DAQ-2024-006882

333 W. Center Street . North Salt Lake Utah 84054 . 801.296.7700. www.bigwestoil.com
January 31,2024
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT NO. 7020 1290 0002 1094 9084
Division of At Quality
Utah Department of Environmental Quality DIVISION OF AIR eUALlTy195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
RE: Consent Decree Progress Report - 2nd Semiannual Report for 2023
Reference DOJ Case Number: 90-5-2-1-07689
Civil Action Case Name: USA et al V. Big \ilest OiI
Civil Action Case Number: 1:13-cv-00121-BSJ
Dear Mr. Bird:
PursuanttoParagraph l27,of theConsentDecreeenteredonNovernber 14,2013, this letter, alongwith
attachments, constitutes the Big West Oil LLC's semi-annual progress report for the period ending
December 31,2023.
Consent Decree I :13-cv-0012 I -BCW: QIX.128 - Certification:
I certify underpenalty of law that this information was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my directions and my inquiry of the person(s) who manage the system,
or the person(s) directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Faithe Schwartzengraber at
[phone].
Sincerely,
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL]TY
FiB - ,,.,,,
5rk6a,,,r*y5ildL
Faithe Schwartzengraber
Environmental Manager
Alec Klinghoffer
Refinery Manager
B-2-10122
Attachments
CC: CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT NO. 9589 0710 52701318 3701 65
Director, Air Enforcement Dvision
Office of Civil Enforcement
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mail Code 2241-A
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington D.C. 204604001
CERTIFIED MAIL RETT]RN RECEIPT NO. 9589 O7IO5270I3I837OI72
Director, Air Enforcement Division
Office of Civil Enforcement
Attn: Norma Eichlin
c/o Matrix New World Eng. Inc.
26 Columbia Tumpike
Florham Park, NJ 07932-2213
CERTIT'IED MAIL RETT]RN RECEIPT NO. 9589 OTIO 52701318 3701 89
Assistant Regiona I Administrator
Office of Enforcement
Compliance and Environmental Justice
1595 Wynkoop Street
Denver, CO 80202-1129
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT NO. 9589 OTIO 52701318 3701 96
Utah Division of Air Quality
Multi Agency State Office Building
I 95 North 1950 West - 4th Floor
Salt Lake City, Utah 841 I 6
I,TAH DEPARTMEI.JT oFElectronic copies to: ENvrRoNMENrarliinirv
imack@matrixn ewo rld.co m
kim.younjoo@epa .gov
[e-mail] FEB -,, ..i.)tt
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Progress Report on the Implementation of the Requirements of
Part V (Affirmative Relief/Environmental Projects) - $IX.
127.a.(l) July l, 2023,through December 31,2023
Part V.A- - NOx Emissions Reductions from FCCU
[il-n-DepnRTMENT oF
E NVr Ro N M E Nl 4l_Q-uallrY
CD
Reference status/comment I otvlstoN oF AIR OUAL
]WO shall implement a program to reduce NOX
:missions from the FCCU at the BWO Refurery.
'ursuant to Part V.M (Incorporation into Federally.
lnforceable Permits), Big West Oil shall
ncorporate emission limits established under !f l 2
nto federally-enforceable permits. BWO will
nonitor compliance with the emission limits
hroueh the use of CEMS.
l1l I BWO has implemented a program to reduce NOx emissions from the FCCU at
the BWO Refrnery and limits are established into federally enforceable permits.
BWO continues to monitor compliance of the emissions timis using CEMs.
\Ox Emission Limit at FCCU. BWO shall
;omply with NOx emission limits of 40 ppmvd
rt 0% O: on a 365-dayrolling average basis and
i0 ppmvd at 0YoO2 on a 7-day rolling average
rasis llom the FCCU.
fll 2.BWO has complied with the FCCU emissions limie during this reporting period.
\ux emEslons ounng penoos or )Jtvl ot me
]CCU, will not be used in determining compliance
vith the 7-day average NOx emission limit
:stablished pursuant to fll2, provided that during
iuch periods BWO implements good air pollution
;ontrol practices to minimize NOx emissions.
{othing in this'![ shall be construed to relieve
IWO of any obligation under any federal or state
aw, or regulation, or permit to report emissions
luring periods of SSM or to document the
)ccurence and/or cause ofa SSM event.
fll3 BWO has operated the FCCU in accordance with good air pollution control
practices to minimize NOx emissions.
)emonstratins Compliance with ICCU NOx
Imission Limits. Beginning no later than the Date
rf Entry, BWO shall use NOx and Ou CEMS to
nonitor performance of the FCCU and to report
:ompliance with the terms and conditions of this
lonsent Decree. The CEMS will be used to
lemonstrate compliance with the respective NO1
:mission Iimits established pursuant to fl12. BWO
rhall make CEMS data available to EPA and the
itate ofUtah uDon reouest as soon as oracticable.
Ilt4 'I'he NOx and ()2 CEMS contrnues to be used to monltor pertbrmance of the
FCCUand to report compliance wittr the terms and conditions of this CD.
Part V.B. - SO2 Emissions Reductions from FCCU
Con*nt Decree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Case l:13-cv-0012 I -BCWS
Semi-Amual Progress Report
July 01, 2023, $rough December 31, 2023
CD
Reference Status/Comment
BWO shall implement a program to reduce
SOz emissions from the FCCU at the BWO
Refinery. Pursuant to Part V.M.
(Incorporation into Federally-Enforceable
Permits) of this Consent Decree, BWO shall
incorporate SOu emission limits established
under !f23 into federally-enforceable permits.
BWO will monitor compliance with the
emission limits throueh the use of CEMs.
122.BWO has implemented a program to reduce SOz ernissions from the FCCU
at the BWO Refurery and limits are established into federally enforceable
permits. BWO continues to monitor compliance of the emissions limits
using CEMs.
SOg Emission Limit. BWO shall comply with
SOz emission limits of 25 ppmvd at 0o% Oz on
a 365-dayrolling average basis and 50 ppmvd
at 0o/oO2 on a 7-day rolling average basis from
the FCCU.
n23.BWO has complied with the FCCU emissions limits during this reporting period.
96-ENI-V- 1470 Page I of 19
SOz emissions during periods of SSM of the
FCCU if it is controlled by catalyst additives,
or during periods of malfunction of a wet gas
scrubber or SOz reducing catalyst additive
system, will not be used in determining
compliance with fte 7-day average SO2
emission limits established pursuant to fl23,
provided that during such periods BWO
implements good air pollution control practices
to minimize SOr emissions.
124.BWO continues to use SOz Reducing Catalyst Additive system has operated
the FCCU in accordance with good air pollution control practices to
minimize SOz emissions.
Demonstratins comDliance with iccu sua
Emission Limits. BWO shall use SOz and Ou
CEMs to monitor performance of the FCCU
and to report compliance with the terms and
conditions of this CD. The CEMs will be used
to demonstrate compliance with the respective
SO2 emission limits. BwO shall make CEMs
data available to the EPA and the State of Utah
uDon reouest as soon a^s oracticable.
t-'.The SOz and Oz CEMS continue to be used to monitor performance of the
FCCUand to report compliance with the terms and conditions of this CD.
Part V.C. - PM Emissions Reductions from FCCU
Crnsnt Decrec, U.S. v. Big Wot Oil LLC, Casc l:13-cv-00 I 2 l -BCWS
Semi-Amual Progres Rcport
July 0l, 2023, through December l l, 2023
UU
Reference Status/Comment
BWO shall install a Flue Gas Filter systern,
manufactured by Pall Corporation at the FCCU
to control emissions of PM
1p2.
fl38.
BWO continues to operate the Flue Gas Pall Filter system to control emissions of
PM from the FCCU.
Emission Limits. BWO shall comply with a
FCCU PM emission limit of 0.5 pounds of PM
per 1000 lb ofcoke bumed on a 3-hr average
basis, and continue to comply with all other
applicable requirements regarding emission of
PM from the FCCU that have been established
by UDEQ.
fl33.The rehnery complied with the FCCU emissions limits and continues to comply
with all other applicable requirements regarding emission of PM from the FCCU
that have been established by UDEQ.
Interim Emission Limit for PM for the
FCCU.
134.See below.
rlvl lestrns lor F(-UU. UWU snall tollow the
stack test protocol specified in 40 C.F.R. $
60.106(bX2) to measure PM emissions from the
FCCU, and shall thereafter conduct annual stack
tests at the FCCU no later than October 31st of
each year unless an approval for less frequent
testing is granted by the EPA.
!t{\BWO has continued to follow the stack test protocol specified to measure PM
emissions from the FCCU on an annual basis, except as noted below. All stack
tests under this CD have demonstrated compliance with the PM emissions limit
of '1f33.
BWO requested a reduction in frequency of PM testing on May 7, 2019. BWO
was approved to conduct PM testing once every three years on October 28,2021.
The most recent stack test was completed by Alliance Source Testing on
December 15,2023. The next stack test is tentatively scheduled for December
2026.
PM emissions during SSM shall not be used in
determining compliance with the 3-hr average
emission limits set forth in !133, provided that
during such periods BWO implements good air
pollution control practices to minimize PM
emissions.
.lT36.BWO continues to implement good air pollution control practices to minimize
PM emissions.
uDacitv Monitoring at luuus.
BWO shall install and operate a Continuous
Opacity Monitoring System ("COMS") to
monitor opacity at the FCCU. BWO shall install,
certifr, calibrate, maintain, and operate all
COMS required by this CD.
''llJ /The COMS continues to be used to monitor performance of the FCCU and to
report compliance with the terms and conditions of ttris CD.
The COMS continues to be certified, calibrated, maintained, and operated
according to the CD requirements.
Reoortine. BWO shall include detailed reporting
regarding status of the installation of the filter
system and related infrastructure required
pursuant to fl32 in the reports required by Section
IX (Reporting and Recordkeeping).
fl38.Not applicable during this reporting period,
96-ENV-1470 Page 2 of 19
Part V.D. - CO Emissions Reductions from FCCU
Part V.E. - Demonstratine Compliance with FCCU Emissions Limits
Part V.F. - NSPS Aoolicabiliw of the FCCU Repenerator
Part V.G. - NOx Emissions Reductions from Heaters and Boilers
Consnt Decree, U.S. v. Big Wet Oil LLC, Case I :1 3-cv-00121 -BCWS
Se mi-Amul hogress Reporr
July 01, 2023, tkough December 3 l, 2023
CD
Reference Status/Comment
CO Emissions Limit for the FCCU. BWO
shall comply with an FCCU CO emission limit
of 500 ppmvd on a 1 -hour average basis at 0%
Oz and continue to comply with all other
applicable requirements regarding emissions of
CO from the FCCU that have been established
by UDEQ.
fl3e.
1141.
The refinery complied with the FCCU emissions limis for this reporting period,
except as noted below, and continue to comply with all other applicable
requirements regarding emissions of CO from the FCCU that have been
established by UDEQ.
BWO has operated the FCCU in accordance with good air pollution control
practices to minimize CO emissions.
A summary of deviations has been prepared and is included below in the table
named:
Part IX.l27.c.(1Xa).(c) - Duration of Exceedance(s) and Downtime as o/o of
Oneratins Time ner Ouarter
NSR Emission Limit lbr C0 for ICCU. At
any time during the term of the CD, BWO may
accept aFinal CO Limit of 100 ppmvd on a
365-day rolling average basis at 0% 02 for its
FCCU.
l14u.Optlon ls not currently under consrderation.
CD
Reference Status/Comment
CEMS will be used to demonstrate compliance
with the NOx, SO: and CO emission limits
established pursuant to T2,123, and fl39. BWO
shall make CEMs data available to EPA upon
request as soon as practicable. BWO shall install,
certifu, calibrate, maintain, and operate all
CEMS required by this CD. BWO must conduct
either a Relative Accuracy Audit ("RAA") or a
Relative Accuracy Test Audit C'RATA) on each
CEMS at least once every three (3)years. BWO
must also conduct CGAs each calendar quarter
durine which a RAA or RATA is not Derformed.
142.BWO continues to use CEMS to demonstrate compliance with the NOx, SO2 and
CO emission limits established pursuant to fl2,183, and '1f39. The NOx, SOz, and
CO CEMS continue to be certified, calibrated, maintained, and operated
according to the CD requirements.
BWO is compliant with the FCCU CEMS RAA/RATA. The mostrecent FCCU
CEMS RATA was conducted by Alliance Source Testing, LLC on March 28,
2023.The FCCU CEMs RATA was submitted in CEDRI on May 5,2023.BWO
conducted CGA's on the FCCU CEM's for each calendar quarter of this
reporting period.
UU
Reference Status/Comment
rne luuu snall be an allected laclllty and shall
be subject to and comply with the requirements
of NSPS Subparts A and J for all pollutants.
'!143 The FCCU is subject to NSPS Subparts A and J
UT'
Reference Status/Comment
l,wu snau comply wrth tIIe NUx emlsslonlmrts
of 0.035 lb/mmBTU on a 3-hour average for
Covered Heaters and Boilers (H-404, BLR-I,
BLR-2, and BLR-6).
1W4.The refinery complied with the emissions limits during this reporting period.
Monitoring NOx Lmissions from Covered
Heaters and Boilers. BWO shall monitor and
test to meet requirements of 1144.
l14).All tsWO Covered heaters and boilers have a heat mput capaclty of equal to or less
than 100 MMBTU/hr (HHV). Please refer to SemiAnnual CD Report July 2014.
BWO shall include in the semi-annual reports
pursuant to 1127, a section describing
installation of ULNR bumers.
fl46.Please see previous semi-annual reports.
96-ENV-1470 Page 3 of 19
CD
Reference Status/Comment
BWO shall undertake measures to reduce SO:
emissions from heaters and boilers by
restricting HzS in Refinery fuel gas and by
agreeing not to continue and/or commence
combusting Fuel Oil except under the
provisions set forth herein.
1fi7 BWO continues to undertake measures to reduce S()2 emrsslonsti'om Retinery
heaters and boilers.
NSPS Applicabilitv of Heaters and Boilers.
All heaters and boilers at the BWO Refmery
shall be affected facilities as that term is used
in 40 CFR 60, Subparts A and J. BWO shall
install, certifo, calibrate, maintain, and operate
a fuel gas CEMs.
.]148.BWO is monitoring and reporting under and as required by NSPS Subparts A
and J for all heaters and boilers at the Refurery. There were no exceedances of
the short-term (3-hour rolling) or long-term (annual) fuel gas H2S limits
during the semi-annual period covered by this report.
The fuel gas CEMS continues to be certified, calibrated, maintained, and
onerated.
Elimination/Reduction of Fuel Oil Burnine.
BWO shall not combust Fuel Oil in any fuel
gas combustion device except during periods
of Natural Gas Curtailment, test runs, and
operator training. Nothing herein is intended to
limit or shall be interpreted as limiting the use
of torch oil durine FCCU Starnros.
1t49.The refinery complied with the elimination/reduction of fuel oil in any fuel gas
combustion device except under ttre provisions set forth in !f49.
Part V.tI. - S02 Emissions Reductions from Heaters and Boilers & NSPS Apnlicability
Part V.I. - Sulfur Recovery Plant
Con$nt Decree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Case 1: I 3-cv-0012 I -BCWS
Semi-Annual hogrcs Report
July 01, 2023, ftrough December 3 l, 2023
CD
Reference Status/Comment
tsWO owns and operates a Sulfur Recovery
Plant located at the BWO Refinery that consists
of one 3 stage Claus recovery unit with a tail
gas incinerator with a rated capacity of 4 long
tons oer dav.
fls0.BWO continues to operate the SuIfur Recovery Plant with one 3-stage Claus
recovery unit with a tail gas incinerator with a rated capacrty of 4 long tons per
day.
Caustic Scrubbers. BWO shall install and
operate a caustic scrubber system to contact the
sour fuel gas with caustic solution to extract
H:S; and expand is sour water storage capaciry
to shut down the SWS and store sour water
during SRP outages to ensure compliance with
NSPS Subpart J at the fuel gas combustion
devices (heaters and boilers) and NSPS Subpart
Ja at the flares during amine unit and SRP
outages.
fl5t BWO continues to operate a caustic scrubber system to contact the sour fuel
gas during amine unit outages and manages the sour water storage capacity to
shut down ttre SWS during outages of the SRP to ensure compliance with
NSPS SubpartJa at the fuel gas combustion devices (heaters and boilers) and
NSPS Subpart Ja at the flares during the amine unit and SRP outages.
Sulfiu Tank Emissions. BWO shall route all
sulfur tank emissions from the SRP so that
sulfur tank emissionsare either eliminated or
included and monitored as part of the
applicable Sulfur Recovery Plant (SRP) tail gas
emissions limits set forth in the applicable State
of Utah Administrative Order.
lpl.BWO continues to route all sulfir tank emissions from the SRP so that sulfur
tank emissions are either eliminated or included and monitored as part of ttre
applicable Sulfur Recovery Plant (SRP) tail gas emissions limits set forth in
the applicable State of Utah Administrative Order.
Sulfur Recovery Plant Emissions
Compliance. BWO shall comply with a 95%
recovery efficiency requirement for all periods
ofoperation except during periods of
scheduled startup, scheduled shutdown, or
malfunction of the SRP. Recovery efficiency
will be determined on a daily basis; however,
compliance will be determined on a rolling 30-
day average basis.
fls3.BWO continues to be in compliance with the 95% recovery efficiency
requirement rolling 30-day average for ttris reporting period.
BWO shall immediately noti$, EPA and the
State of Utah in writing if monitoring
indicates that sulfur inout to the SRP exceeds
lls4.BWO continues to be in compliance. Sulfur input does not exceed the limit of 20
long tons in any calandar day.
96-ENV- 1470 Page 4 of l9
zIJ LIPD.
Good Oneration and Maintenance. BWO
shall submit a Preventative Maintenance and
Operation Plan and comply with the plan at
all times including SSM. Any modifications
made by BWO to the PMO plan that are
related to further minimizing Acid Gas
Flaring and/or SOz emissions shall be
summarized in ttre semi-annual reports.
fl5s - fl56.BWO complies with the PMO Plan at all times, including periods of scheduled
start up, scheduled shut down, and malfunction of the SRP.
PMO Plan submittal dated May 8,2014.
Optimization Studv. BWO shall complete an
optimization study on the SRP and report to
EPA and UDEQ. BWO shall implement the
recommendations of the optimization studyand
incorporate the results of that study into the
PMO Plan.
lls7.The Optimization Study was completed and submitted. BWO implemented the
recommendations and incorporated the results of that study into the PMO Plan.
BWO continues to operate a SRP that consists of one 3 stage Claus sulfir recovery
unit with a tail gas incinerator with a rated capacity of 4 long tons per day. BWO
continues to comply with the Preventative Maintenance and Operation Plan and
Ontimization Studv
Reoortins. BWO shall include detailed
reporting of the installation of the caustic
scrubber svstems in semi-annual reoorts.
l15E.Hl&lse see prevlous seml-annual reports.
Part V.J. - NSPS Applicabilitv & Comnliance for Flarins Devices
Consent Decree, U.S. v. Big Wst Oil LLC, Casc I I I 3-cv-001 2 l -BCWS
Semi-Amual hogle$ Re!0rt
July 0l, 2023, through December 3 1,2023
CD
Reference Status/Comment
NSPS Subparts A and Ja shall apply for both
BWO flares. BWO shall install, operate,
calibrate and maintain HzS CEMS at refinery
flares incompliance with Subpart Ja.
fl5e.Flaring Devices at the BWO Refurery are monitored and reported under and as
required by NSPS Subparts A and Ja. BWO continues to operate, calibrate, and
maintain CEMs on both the South and West Flares. See Jll27.c(1)(a-c).
@For
all Flaring Devices at the BWO Refl:rery,
BWO shall comply widr the NSPS obligation
to implement good air pollution control
practices as required by 40 C.F.R. $ 60. 1 1(d)
to minimize HC and AG Flarine Incidents.
fl60 For all flaring devices, BWO, complied with the NSPS obligation to implement
good air pollution practices to minimize flaring incidents during this reporting
period.
Fhrins Historv. BWO has submitted a report
to EPA identifuing each AG Flaring Incident
between ll 11012004 and 8120/2010.
'1T6 l.See previous reporting.
Provisions Applicable to Control of Flaring
Incidents.
162.See below.
BWO shall comply with the provisions offl63
through fl70 until the RCA and CA
requirements for flares under Subpart Ja
become aoolicable.
162.a.The root cause analysis and corrective action requirements ofSubpart Ja are
incorporated into a permit pursuant to tf107.
BWO shall comply with ttre provisions in
SubpartJaregarding the investigation of the
cause offlaring incidents subject to
investigation and corrective action under
Subpart Ja. Each Flaring Incident Report shall
be included in the Semi-Annual Report
required byfl69.
l162.b Dee'llov oelow.
lntenm uontrol oI Acld Gas llanng
Incidents. BWO agrces to implement a
program to investigate the cause of future AG
flaring incidents, to take reasonable steps to
correct the conditions that have caused or
contributed to such incidents and to minimize
AG Flaring Incidents. BWO shall follow
procedures to evaluate whether future AG
flaring incidents are due to malfunctions or
are subiect to stinulated nenalties.
fl63.There were no acid-gas flaring incidents during this reporting period.
96-ENV-1470 Page 5 of l9
Investiqation and Keportrng. No later thiur
45 days after an acid gas flaring incident
BWO shall conduct an investigation into the
root causes of 0re flaring incident and record
the resultof the investigation. Each incident
report shall be included in the semi-annual
report.
,1164.There were no acid-gas flaring incidents during this reporting period.
Corrective Action. In response to any AG
flaring incidents, BWO shall take, as
expeditiously as practicable, such interim
and/or long-term corrective actions as are
consistent with good engineering practice to
minimize the likelihood of areturrence of the
root cause and all contributing causes ofthe
AG flarine incident.
fl65 -,1T67 There were no acid-gas flaring incidents dunng thls reportrng penod.
Tail Gas Incidents. a. Investieation.
Reportine. Corrective Action. and Stipulated
Penalties. Fortail gas incidents BWO shall
follow the same investigative, reporting, and
corrective action requirements. These
procedures shall be applied to TGU
shutdowns, bypasses of a TGU, or other
events which result in a Tail Gas Incident,
including unscheduled shutdowns of the Claus
Sulfiu Recoverv olant. b. Calculation of the
Otv of SO2 Emissions Resultine lrom a Tail
Gas Incident. See fl68.b
1T68.There were no tail gas incidents during thls reporttng penod.
Semi-Annual Reportins. BWO shall submit to
EPA and the State of Utah a Semi-Annual report
that includes copies ofeach and every reportof
all Acid Gas Flaring Incidents, Tail Gas Incidents
and Hydrocarbon Flaring Incidents that BWO
was reouired to DreDare.
fl6e.All Acid Gas Flaring Incidents, Tail Gas Incidents and Hydrocarbon Flaring
Incidents that BWO was required to prepare under tf62.b, 64, 68 and 70 during
theprevious six-month period are included in this Semi-Annual Report if
applicable for the reporting period under Attachment 2.
Control of Hvdrocarbon Flarins Incidents.
BWO shall follow the same investigative
reporting and corrective action procedures as for
AG flaring incidents; provided however, that in
lieu of analyzing possible CA and taking interim
and/or long-term CA for a Hydrocarbon Flaring
Incident anributable to the startup or shutdown o
a unit has previously been analyzed. Use same
formulas as !167.
'11/u.There were no hydrocarbon flaring incidents during this reporting period.
Con*nt Decree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Casc l:l 3-cv-0012 I -BCWS
Scmi-Amul hogres Report
July 01, 2023, through December 3 l. 2023 96-ENV-1470 Page 6 of l9
Part V.K. - Benzene Waste Onerations NESIIAP Proeram Enhancements
Consent Decrec, U.S. v. Big Wct Oil LLC, Case l:l 3-cv-00 l2 | -BCWS
Semi-Amual Progress Report
July 01, 2023, lhrough December 3 l, 2021
CD
Reference Status/Comment
In addition to complying with Subpart FF, BWO
agrees to continue compliance with Subpart FF
and minimize or eliminate fugitive benzene
waste emissions.
1l7t BWO continues to comply with Subpart FF.
BWO has a TAB of less than l0Mg/yr. BWO
will review and verify the TABs at BWO
refinery consistent with the One-Time Review
and Verification.
fl72.BWO complies with fl72.
If at any time BWO is determined to have aTAB
equal to or greater than 10 Mg/yr, BWO shall
comply with the compliance option set forth at
40 C.F.R. g 61.3a2(e) (hereinafter referred to as
the "6 BQcompliance option").
fl73.BWO Refinery Total Annual Benzene ("TAB) remains less than 10 Mg/yr.
One'Time Review and Verilication of the
BWO Relinerv's TAB. a. Phase One of the
Review andVerification Process. BWO shall
complete areview and verification of the TAB
of the BWO Refinery. b. Phase Two of the
Review and Verification Process. EPA may
select up to 20 additional waste sfearns upon
Tt4,One-time review and verification of BWO Refmery's TAB is complete.
Imolementation of Actions Necessarv to
Correct Non-Comoliance.
fl1s.See below.
a. Amended TAB Reports. If the results of the
BWON Compliance Review and Verification
Report or Amended BWON Compliance
Review and Verification Report indicate the
BWO failed to frle the reports required or the
filed report is inaccurate, BWO shall submit an
amended TA Fl renort
fl75.a.Not apptcable for this reporting period.
b. If the results indicate that BWO has a TAB
over l0Mg/yr, BWO shall submit to EPA and
UDEQ a plan that identifies with specificity the
compliance strategy and schedule that BWO
shall implement to ensure that the BWO
refinery complies with the 6BQ compliance
ontion as soon as nracticahle
fl7s.b.BWO will submitan amended TAB report to EPA and UDEQ if the results of fl71
73 above indicate BWO has failed to file the reports required or the reports are
inaccurate.
c. Review and Aooroval of Plans Submitted
Pursuant to fl75b. Any plan submitted shall be
subject to approval, disapproval, or modification
by EPA.
tE5.c.Not applicable for this reporting period.
d. Certihcation of Compliance with the 680
Compliance Ootion. BWO shall submit a report
to EPA and UDEQ that the Refinery complies
with RwoN.
fl75.d.Not applicable for this reporting period.
Annual Prosram. BWO shall establish,
maintain, and conduct an annual program for
reviewing process information for the BWO
Refinery, including but not limited to
consfuction projects, to ensure that all new
benzene waste streams are included in the BWO
Refinerv's waste stream inventorv and TAB.
n76.BWO continues to annually review process information for the BWO Refinery,
including but not limited to construction projects, to ensure that all new benzene
waste streams are included in the BWO Refinery's waste stream inventory and
TAB.
Benzene Soills. For each spill at the refinery,
BWO shall review such spills to determine if
benzene waste was generated. BWO shall
include benzene generated by each spill(s) of
l0 pounds or more ofbenzene in any 24-hour
period in the annual progriun TAB for ttre
BWO Refinery.
lw.There were no reportable spills that generated l0 pounds or more ofbenzene in any
24-hour period dwing the reporting period.
Trainins-tT78 See below
96-ENV-1470 Page 7 of 19
a. BWO shall develop and implement annual
training for all employees asked to draw
benzene waste samples.
'l[8.a.All employees and contractors asked to draw benzene waste samples between July
01,2023, to December 31,2023, have completed BWON annual computer-based
traininp or eouivalent classroom tainine durins the reDortins period.
b. If the TAB reaches l0Mg/yr or more BWO
shall develop and maintain SOP for all control
eouioment used with BWON.
fl78.b.Not applicable for this reporting penod.
c. BWO must ensure that all contractors hired
to oerform BWON are orooerlv trained.
'!T78.c.See ![8.a. above.
Waste/Slop/Off-Srec Oil Management.lile.See below.
a. BWO shall prepare schematics that will be
iubmitted as part of the EOL Sampling Plan.
!l7e.a.EOL Sampling Plan and schematics submitted, please see prior reporting.
b. Oreanic Benzene Waste Strearns. If TAB
reaches l0Mg/yr and a compliance sfrategy is
approved, all waste management units handling
benzene wastes shall meet applicable control
standards of Subpart FF or agree to a schedule
for completion.
!17e.b.Not applicable for this reporting period. TAB is below l0 Mg/yr.
c. Aqueous Benzene Waste Streams. Calculating
the TAB.
!Pe.c.Not applicable for this reporting period. TAB is below l0 Mg/yr.
d. Plan to Ouantifv Uncontrolled
Waste/Slop/Off-Spec Oil Streams. Quantifi ed in
the EOL Samoline Plan.
fl7e.d.Not applicable fbr this reportrng penod.
Periodic Samplins (TAB less than 10
Ms/vd.
flS0.See below
a. These provisions shall apply when the One-
Time Review and Verification shows that the
TAB is equal to or greater than I Mg/yr but
less than 10 Mg/yr.
fl80.a.BWO continues to comply with the provisions of fl80. AII TAB submissions
remain equal to or greater than I Mg/yr but less than l0 Mg/yr.
T\e 2022 TAB report dated April 5, 2023, estimated that approximately 3.41
metric tons of benzene were contained in the refinery process waste streams for the
2022 ooeratins vear.
b. BWO shall conduct sampling of all waste
steams (consistent with 561.355(cXl) and
(3)) ftat contributed 0.05 Mg/yr or more to
the TAB set in the BWON Compliance
Review and Verification Report, Amended
BWON Compliance and Verification Reporq
or nrevious vear's TAB. whichever is later.
tTS0.b.BWO conducted annual sampling of all waste streams containing benzene that
contributed 0.05 Mg/yr. or more in the previous year's TAB during the reporting
period.
c. EOL SamBline Plan. EOL sampling plan
submitted to EPA and UDEQ. If changes in
processes, operations, or other factors lead
BWO to conclude that either the approved
sampling locations and/or the approved
methods for determining flow calculations no
longer provide an accurate measure ofthe
BWO refnery's EOL benzene quantity, BWO
shall submit a revised plan to EPA for
approval and a copy ofthe revised plan shall
be submitted to the UDEO.
fl80.c.Big West Oil is expecting to submit a modification to the EOL sampling plan
within the next 60 days to address changes to the approved sampling locations and
a general update ofthe plan.
d. BWO shall conduct an EOL determination
of benzene quantity. BWO shall take and
have analyzed at least three representative
samples from each approved sampling
location, with tkee of the samples in each
calendar quarter spaced at least one month
apart. BWO shall use the average of these
three samples as the benzene concentation
for the sfream at the approved location.
Based on the EOL quarterly sampling resuls
and the approved flow calculations, BWO
shall calculate the quarterly EOL benzene
quantity and a projected calendar year TAB,
utilizing all EOL resuls for that calendar year
and any other information (such as process
hrrnarounds) to undertake the proiection.
fl80.d.BWO has taken and analyzed at least three representative samples fiom each
proposed sampling location in each calendar quarter consistent with the approved
EOL Sampling Plan.
Additional information is included in Attachment 3.
If the quarterly EOLbenzene quantity is
calculated to exceed 2.5 Mg, BWO shall
submit to EPA and UDEQ an explanation of
the excess benzene waste senerated. BWO
fl80.d. (l)Not applicable for this reporting period.
Scmi-Annul Progress Report
July 01, 2023, through December 31, 2023 96-ENV-1470 Page 8 of 19
If the quarterly EOLbenzene quantity is
calculated to exceed 2.5 Mg, BWO shall
submit to EPA and UDEQ an explanation of
the excess benzene waste generated. BWO
shall submit this explanation within 30 days
after the end of the quarter which resulted in
an EOL benzene ouantitv sreater than 2-5 Mp
fl80.d. (1)Not applicable for this reporting period.
If the projected calendar year TAB is
calculated to equal or exceed l0 Mg, BWO
shall submit to EPA and UDEQ a plan that
identifies with specificity the actions and
schedule for such actions that BWO will take
to ensure that the TAB for the BWO Refinery
does not exceed 10 Mg in the calendar year.
BWO shall submit ttris plan within 30 days
after the end of the quarter which resulted in a
oroiection sreater than l0 Ms-
fl80.d. (2)Not applicable for this reporting period.
Ifit appears that appropriate action cannot be
taken to ensure that the BWO Refrrery
maintains a TAB of under 10 Mg/yr BWO
shall retain a third-party contractor to
undertake a comprehensive TAB study and
compliance review. Within sixty days of
submitting the plan, BWO shall submit a
proposal to EPA and UDEQ that identifies the
contftrctor, the contractor's scope of work and
the contractor's schedule for the third-party
TAB study and Compliance Review.
I6U.e.Not applrcabte Ior mrs reportrng penoo.
Periodic Samplins (TAB of l0 MG/vr or
More).
'118 I See below
Only applicable if BWO Refurery's TAB
reaches or exceeds 10 Mg/yr.
f8 r - tT82 Not applicable for this reporting period.
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
for this Part V.IC At the times specified in the
applicable provisions of this Part BWO shall
submit, as and to the extent required, the
followingreports to EPA and UDEQ: Reports
required pursuantto 40 C.F.R. $61.357 and the
Semi-annual Progress Report Procedures of
Part IX (Reporting and Record Keeping) shall
continue to aDDlv.
fl83 See below and tl80.d.(I){2).
BWON Compliance Review and
Verification Report (l[4), as amended, if
necessary;
'1f83.a.Not applicable for this reporting period.
Amended TAB Report, if necessary,
Dursuant to tT 75.a.
!T83.b.Not applicable for ttris reporting period.
Plan for the BWO Refinery to come into
compliance with the 6 BQ compliance option
upon discovering that its TAB equals or exceeds
l0 Mg/yr through the BWON Compliance
Review and Verification Report (!p5.b),or the
Third-Party TAB Study and Compliance Review
that may result from EOL sampline (fl80.e):
'lluJ.c.Not appllcable lor thls reportmg penod.
uomp[ance cemllcatron, rt necessary
fl75.d;
lluJ.d.Not applicable fbr this reporting period.
Schedule to complete implementation of
confiols on waste management units
handling organic benzene waste, if necessary
(tT79.b):
l16J.e.Not apptlcable tor th$ reporhng penod.
EOL Sampling Plans ('lf80.c and ![81.b), and
revised EOL Sampling Plans, if necessary (tl80.c
and t[81.c):
lluJ.r.Not applicable tbr this reporting period.
Plan, if necessary, to ensure that unconholled
benzene does not equal or exceed, as
applicable, 6 or l0 Mg/yr, or is minimized,
based on oroiected calendar vear uncontrolled
lT83.e.Not applicable for this reporting period.
Con*nt Decree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Cas l:13-cv-00t21-BCWS
Semi-Amual Proge$ Rcport
July 01, 2021, through December 31, 202J 96-Eln/-1470 Page 9 of l9
benzene quantities as determined ttrrough EOL
sampling (fl80.d.(l), fl80.d.(2), and fl80.e);
Proposal for a Third-Party TAB Study and
Compliance Review, if necessary (fl80.e and
!T81.fl:
fl83.h.Not applicable for this reporting period.
Third-Party TAB Study and Compliance
Review. if necessarv (ll8O.eand !181.0: and
lT83.i.Not applicable for *ris reporting period.
Plan to implement the results of the Third-
Party TAB Study and Compliance Review,
if necessary (lT80.e and f81.fl.
I]UJJ.Not applicable for this reporting period.
Reports Required under the Semi-annual
Progress Report Procedures of Part IX
fReportine and Record Keepins).
.lT84.See below.
Refinery TAB > I Mg/yr but < l0 Mg/yr -
BWO shall submit the following information in
Semi-annual Progress Reports pursuant to the
requirements of Part IX (Reporting and Record
Keepins) of this Consent Decree:
fl84.a.See below.
A description of the measures that it took to
comolv with the trainine provisions of fl 781
T8a.a.(1)Refer to 1[8.4 '![8.b and ![8.c of this report.
The annual, non-EOL sampling required at the
BWO Refrnery pursuant to the requirements of
Subparagraph 80.b (Periodic Sampling< I 0MG)
(this information shall be submitted in the first
Serni-annual Drogress report of each year);
'1184.a.(2)lnformation is included in Aftachment 3.
The results of the quarterly EOL samphng
undertaken pursuant to Subparagraph 80.d
(Periodic Sampling) for the Calendar quarter.
The report shall include a list of all waste
streams sampled, the results of the benzene
analysis for each sample, and the computation
ofthe EOL benzene quantity for the respective
quarter. The BWO Refrnery shall identify
whettrerttre quarterly benzene quantity equals
or exceeds 2.5 Mg and whether the projected
calendar year benzene quantity equals or
exceeds l0 Mg. If either condition is met, the
BWO Refinery shall include in the Semi-
annual report the plan required pursuant to
tf80.e. and shall specifically seek EPA's
concurrence in the plan.
fl84.a.(3)lnformation is included in Attachment 3.
lAlJ ls lu Mg/yr or more. lI me l,wu
Refmery's TAB reaches or exceeds l0 Mg/yr,
BWO shall submit the following information in
the Semi-Annual Reports.
llE4.b Not applicable for this reporting penod.
Agencies to Receive Reports, Plan and
Certifications Required in the Part. BWO
shall submit all reports, plans and certifications
required to be submitted under this Part to EPA
and UDEO.
"llu).Not applicable for this reporting period.
Laboratory Audits. BWO shall conduct audits
of all laboratories that perform analyses of
BWO's benzene waste operations NESHAP
samples to ensure that proper analytical and
quality assurance/quality control procedures are
followed. These audits may be conducted either
by BWO personnel or third parties. BWO may
retain third parties to conduct these audits or
use audits conducted by others as its own, but
BWO has the sole responsibility and obligation
to ensure compliance with this CD and Subpart
FF.
f86.a.Atlas Technical Consultants (Atlas) last conducted an audit of the Chemtech-Ford
l,aboratories facility located in Sandy, Utah on February 25,2022. An audit is not
required during this reporting period. The next BWON laboratory audit is
tentatively scheduled forthe I't Quarter of 2024.
Following completion of the initial audit of the
laboratories used within one (1) year, BWO
shall audit any new laboratory used
for analyses of benzene samples prior to use of
lT86.b.Not applicable for ttris reporting period.
v-00121-BCWS
Semi-Amual hogre$ Rf port
July 0l, 2023, lhrough December 3 l, 2023 96-ENV-1470 Page l0ofl9
the new laboratory.
During the life of this Consmt Decree, BWO
shall conduct subsequent laboratory audits,
such that each laboratory is audited
everv two (2) vears.
Iluo.c.Atlas Technical Consultants (Atlas) last conducted an audit of the Chemtech-Ford
Laboratories facility located in Sandy, Utah on February 25,2022. An audit is not
required during this reporting period. The next BWON laboratory audit is
tentativelv scheduled forthe l't Ouarter of 2024.
CD
Reference Status/Comment
BWO shall undertake the following measures to
improve the LDAR program, to minimize or
eliminate fugitive emissions from equipment in
light liquid and/or in gas/vapor service, and to
make all existing facilities "affected facilities,"
within the meaning of 40 C.F.R. $$ 60.2 and
60.590(aX3). subiect to NSPS Subpart GGG.
fl87.All BWO Reflu:rery Process Units are monitored and reported under and as
required by NSPS Subparts GGGa.
BWO shall implement at the Refinery the
enhancements at this Part V.L to the LDAR
program under Title 40 ofthe Code ofFederal
Regulations, Part 60, Subpart GGG; Part 61,
Subpars J and V; Part 63, Subparts F, H, and
CC.
fl88.BWO has incorporated and implemented the enhancements of Part V.L to the
Refinery's LDAR program.
Allecled -Facl[Ues. UDon me Uate ol L.ntrv. au
equipment, as deflrned by 40C.F.R. $ 60.591,
within each process unit and all compressors at
BWO Refinery shall become "affected
facilities" for purposes of 40 C.F.R. Part 60,
Subpart GGG, and shall become subject to and
comply with the requirements of 40 C.F.R.
Part60, Subpart GGG, and ttre requirements of
Part V.L of this Consent Decree, provided that
any such equipment or compressors that are
subject to 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subparts CC, F,
or H, or 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart GGGa,
shall comply with those Subparts, as
aoolicable. not Suboart GGG.
ll6v.All lrwu Ketmery uompressors are monrtored and reported unoer and irs
required by NSPS Subparts GGGa.
Written Relinery-Wide LDAR Program.
BWO shall update the prograrn as necessary to
ensure continuing compliance. A description of
program changes shall be maintained on-site
during the life of the Consent Decree but need
not be submitted to the agencies.
'1190.BWO maintains and implements a Written Refinery-Wide LDAR Program
pursuant to !f90. to ansure compliance all applicable regulations.
Updates to the program are completed as necessary to ensure continuing
compliance. A description of program changes is maintained on-site and will be
maintained during the life of the Consent Decree.
I rammg. I or personnel newly asslgned to
LDAR responsibilities, BWO shall require
LDARtraining prior to each employee
beeinnins such work:
'lJ9l.a.AII personnel newly assigned to LDAR responsibilities receive training prior to
beginning LDAR work.
For all personnel assigned LDAR
responsibilities, including but not limited to,
monitoring technicians, database users, QA/QC
personnel and the LDAR Coordinator, BWO
shall provideand require completion of initial
LDAR trainingand annual training thereafter;
and
,lt9l.b.All personnel assigned to LDAR responsibilities receive annual training.
Part V.L. -Leak Detection and Repair f'LDAR") Prosram Enhancements
Consnt Decree, U.S. v. Big Wct Oil LLC, Case l:l 3-cv-0012 | -BCWS
Semi-Amual hogress Report
July 0l, 2021. through December 3 I, 202J 96-ENV-1470 Pagellof19
For all other Refinery operatrons and
maintenance personnel including, but not
limited to, operators and mechanics performing
valve packing and designated unit supervisors
reviewing for delay of repair work, BWO shall
provide andrequire completion of an initial
training program that includes instruction on
aspects of LDAR that are relevant to the
person's duties. "Refresher" training in LDAR
for these personnel shall be performed at a
minimum on a three (3) year cycle.
Ily l .c.All personnel assigned to LDAR responsibilities receive annual and
refresher training this includes refurery operations and maintenance
personnel.
If contract employees are performing LDAR
work, BWO's contractor shall comply with the
training requirements in !191 .a, b, and c for all
such conhactor employees and, if such
training is provided by anyone other than
BWO, shall provide its training information
and records to BWO.
fle 1.d.If contract employees are performing LDAR work, the contractors comply with
the taining requirements in !f9l.a, b, and c.
LDAR Audits. BWO shall implement the
refinery-wide audits to ensure the refinery's
compliance with all applicable LDAR
requirements.
flez See !f92.b below.
Third-Partv Audits. BWO shall retain an
independent contractor(s) with expertise in
LDAR program requirements to perform a
third-party audit of the BWO Retrnery's LDAR
Program at least once every four (4) years. The
first third-party audit for the BWO Refinery
shall be completed no later than twelve (12)
months after Date of Entry. Subsequentthird-
party audits shallbe held every four (4) years
thereafter.
fle2.b.
(2022,
2026)
A Third-Party LDAR Audit began on Decembd 5^, zt)22 and was concluded on
May 15'h,2023.
Intemal Audits. BWO shall conduct internal
audits of the BWO Refinery's LDAR Program
by sending personnel associated with BWO's
LDAR conhactor(s) who are familiar with the
LDAR program and its requirements butare not
routinely assigned to the BWO Refinery. BWO
shall complete the first round of these intemal
LDAR audits within two (2) years following
completion of the hrst third-party audit
required under Subparagraph 92.b. Intemal
audits of the BWO Refinery shall be held every
four (4) vears thereafter.
'u92.c.
(2020,
2024)
BWO has elected to comply with the intemal audit provisions tlrough the
alternative compliance option provided in V.L.'1192.e., which allows BWO
Refinery to retain third parties to undertake these audits.
This option was utilized for the 2020 Calendar year audit that commenced on
November 9$,2020. The 2020 LDAR CD Audit was performed by PROtect,
LLC (PROtect), of Colwich, KS, in partnership with Barr Engineering Co. (Barr)
of Salt lake City, UT.
The next internal audit is tentatively scheduled to occur during the second semi-
annual period of2024.
To ensure that an audit occurs every 2 years,
third-party and intemal audits shall be
separated bv 2 vears.
fl92.d The Third-Party and Internal LDAR Audits meet tlris criteria.
Altemative. As an alternative to the internal
audits required BWO may elect to retain
third parties to undertake these audits,
provided that an audit of BWU refmery
occurs every 2 years.
192.e Seefl92.c. above.
Implementation of Actions Necessarv to
Correct Non-Comnliance. If the results ot'any
of the audits conducted pursuant to '!f92. at the
Refinery identiff any areas ofnon-compliance,
BWO shall implement all steps necessary to
correct 0re area(s) ofnon-compliance as soon as
practicable, and to prevent a recurrence ofthe
cause ofthe non-compliance to the extent
practicable. Until trvo (2) years after
termination of this ConsentDecree, BWO shall
retain the audit reports generated pursuant to
fl92. and shall maintain awritten record of the
corrective actions that BWO takes at the
Refinerv in resoonse to anv deficiencies
fle3.The results of the most recent Third Party LDAR Audit conducted pursuant
to !f92. at the Relurery identified areas of non-compliance. BWO will
implement all steps necessary to correct the area(s) of non-compliance as
soon as practicable, and to prevent arecurrence ofttre cause ofthe non-
compliance to the extent practicable. BWO has and will retain dre audit
reports generated pursuant to fl92. Areas ofnon-compliance have been
identified and the associated corrective actions were submitted November
29,2023 in a supplemental report.
Con*nt Decree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Case l:13-cv-00121-BCWS
Semi-Amual Progress Report
July 01, 2023, through December 3 I, 2023 96-ENV-1470 Pagel2ofl9
identified in any audits. Pursuant to the
provisions ofPart IX ofthis Consent Decree
(Reporting and Record Keeping), BWO shall
submit the audit reports and corrective action
records for audits performed and actions taken
during the previous year.
Internal Leak Definition for Valves and
Pumps. BWO shall utilize the following
intemal leak definitions for valves in light
liquid or gas/vapor service and pumps in light
liquid service, unless other permit(s),
regulations, or laws require the use of lower
leak defrritions.
fle4.BWO utilizes the CD intemal leak definitions for valves in light liquid or
gas/vapor service and pumps in light liquid service, unless other permit(s),
regulations, or laws require the use of lower leak definitions.
Leak Delrnltlon tor valves. Hwu sna[ unlrze
an internal leak definition of 500 ppm VOCs
for all of the BWO Refinery's valves,
excluding pressure relief devices, in light
liouid or sas/vaoor service.
!J94.a.See fl94.
Leak Definition for Pumos. BWO shall utilize
an intemal leak definition of 2,000 ppmVOCs
for all of the BWO Refinery's pumps in light
liquid service.
lle4.b See. 1194.
Reportine. Recordins. Tracking. Repairins.
and Re.monitorins Leaks of Valves and
Pumos Based in the Internal Leak
Definitions.
'1195.See below.
RS@il&_For regulatory reporting purposes,
BWO may continue to report leak rates in
valves and pumps against the applicable
regulatory leak definifion, or may use the lower,
intemal leak definitionsspecified infl94. BWO
will identifu in the report which definition is
being used.
fl95.a.BWO has indicated in the regulatory reports which definition is being used.
Recordine. Trackine. Repairine and Re-
monitorins Leaks. BWO shall record, track,
repair and re-monitor all leaks in excess of the
internal leak definitions of !J94. at such time as
those definitions become applicable, except that
BWO shall have five (5) days to make an initial
attempt and re-monitor the component and have
thtrfy (30) days to make repairs and re-monitor
leaks that are greater than the intemal leak
definitions but less than the applicable regulatory
leak defmitions, or toplace on the delay of repair
list accordins to lll03.
fles.b.BWO has complied with ttre requirements to record, hack, repair, and re-
monitoring leaks in excess of the intemal leak definitions.
Initial Attempt at Repairs on Valves.
BWO shall promptly make an "initial attempt" at
repair on any valve that has a reading greater
than 200 ppm of VOCs, excluding conhol valves
and other valves that LDAR personnel are not
authorized torepair. The leaking valve will be re-
monitored within 5 days of identification. If the
re-monitored leak reading is below the intemal
leak definition, no further action will be
necessary. If the re-monitored leak reading is
greater than the intemal leak definition, BWO
shall repair the leaking valve according to the
requirements. All records of repairs, repair
attempts, and re-monitoring shall be maintained
for life of CD.
fle6.BWO completes initial aftempt at repairs and re-monitoring within five (5) days
and effective repair and re-monitoring within thirty (30) days or places the
leaking component on the delay of repair list according to the Delay-of-Repair
provisions in $V.L.103. BWO complies with the provisions in!f96 and completes
initial attempts at repair on valves as required. All records of repairs, repair
attempts, and re-monitoring are maintained forthe life of the CD.
LDAR Monitoring Freo uencv.fle1.See below.
Consnt Decr€e, U.S. v. Big Wat Oil LLC, Cas l:l 3-cv-001 2 l -BCWS
Se mi-Amual hogress Rcport
July 01,2023, througb December 31, 2021 96-ENV-1470 Pagel3ofl9
Pumos. Unless more frequent monitoring is
required by a federal or state regulation, when
the lower intemal leak definition for pumps
becomes applicable pursuant to the provisions
of ll94.b, BWO shall begin monitoring pumps in
light liquid service, other than dual-mechanical
seal pumps or pumps vented to a control device,
at the lower leak definition on a monthlv basis.
1191.a.BWO is monitoring pumps at an lnternal leak detinttton monthly ur accordance
with.|T97.a.
Valves. Unless more frequent monitoring is
required by a federal or state regulation, when
the lower internal leak definition for valves
becomes applicable pursuant to the provisions
of fl94.a, BWO shall monitor valves, other than
difficult to monitor or unsafe to monitor valves,
on a quarterly basis, with no ability to skip
periods.
lle /.b.BWO is monitoring applicable valves on a quarterly basis and has not applied
skip period monitoring in accordance with fl97.b.
l,lectronic Monitorinq. Storing. and reDorting
of LDAR Data.
'1T98.See below.
Electronic Storine andReportine of LDAR
Data. BWO shall continue to maintain an
electronic database for storing and reporting
LDAR monitoring and repair data from the
BWO Refinerv.
fl98.a BWO continues to maintain an electronic database tbr stonng and reportrng
LDAR monitoring and repair data from the BWO Refinery. The Inspection Logic
Corporation - LeakDAS Database is currently used to comply with this provision.
Electronic Data Collection Durine LDAR
Monitorine and Transfer Thereafter. BWO shall
use dataloggers and/or electronic data collection
devices duringlDAR monitoring. BWO, or its
designated contractor, shall use is/their best
efforts to transfer, at leastevery seven (7) days,
electronic data fromelectronic datalogging
devices to the electonic database required in
fl98.a. BWO shall transfer any manually
recorded monitoring data to the electronic
database required in !198.a within seven (7) days
of monitoring.
fle8.b.BWO uses dataloggers and/or electronic data collection devices during LDAR
monitoring. BWO, or its designated contractor, use its/their best efforts to fansfer,
at least every seven (7) days, electronic data from electronic datalogging devices to
theelechonic database required in fl98.a. BWO uses paper logs where necessary or
more feasible (e.g., small rounds, re- monitoring, or when dataloggers are not
available or broken). BWO uses its best efforts to transfer any manually recorded
monitoring data to the electronic database within seven (7) days of monitoring.
During the most rerent Third Party LDAR Audit, it was found that 18 manual
recorded inspections and 20 datalogger recorded inspections were uploaded to the
database more than seven (7) days after monitoring events.
uA/uu ot Lt AK uata. Bwu, or a mrd-party
contractor retained by BWO, shall develop and
implement a review procedure to ensure a
quatty assurance/quality control ("QA/QC") of
alldata generated by LDAR monitoring
technicians. BWO or contractor monitoring
technicians shall review monitoring data each
day aftermonitoring is conducted to ensure
QA/QC of the data. At least once per Calendar
quarter, BWO shall perform QA/QC of the
monitoring data which shall include, but not be
limitedto: number of components monitored per
technician, time between monitoring events,
and abnormal data pattems. BWO shall
communicate monitoring results to unit
supervisors on a weekly basis.
'livv.BWO developed and implemented a review procedure to ensure a quality
assurance/qualiry control ("QA/QC') of all data generated by LDAR monitoring
technicians.
BWO or contractor monitoring technicians review monitoring data each day after
monitoring is conducted to ensure QA/QC of the data.
At least once per Calendar quarter, BWO shall perform QA/QC of the monitoring
data.
BWO communicates monitoring results to unit supervisors and maintenance
planners on a weekly basis.
LDAR PersonneL BWO shall establish a
program that will hold LDAR personnel
accountable for LDAR performance. BWO shall
maintain a position within the BWO Refinery
responsible for LDAR management, with the
auttrority to implement improvements C'LDAR
Coordinator').
fl100.BWO maintains program that holds LDAR personnel accountable for
LDAR performance. BWO maintains an LDAR Manager position within
ttre refinery in accordance with this provision.
Addine New Valves and Pumps.flI01 See below.
Manaeement of Chanee. By no later than the
Date of Enfy, BWO shall establish a tracking
program for maintenance records (e.g., a
Management of Change program) to ensure that
valves and pumps added to the BWO Refinery
during maintenance and construction are
inteerated into the LDAR Prosram.
$101.a.BWO established a tracking program for maintenance records (e.g., a
Management of Change program) to ensure that valves and pumps added to the
BWO Refinery during maintenance and construction are integrated into the
LDAR Program.
Consnt Dccree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Cas 1:l l-cv-0012 I -BCWS
Scmi-Amual hogress Re port
July 01, 2021, lhrough December 3 I, 2023 96-ENV-1470 Pagel4ofl9
Newlv-Installed Valves.'lLl t,l _a.See below.
BWO shall ensure that all newly installed
valves (other than sampling and
instrumentation valves in service on pipingwith
a diameter of5/8" or less) are fitted, prior to
installation, with Certified Low- Leaking
Valves or Certified Low-Leaking Valve
Packing Technology; and
tTl0l.b.(1)BWO uses its best efforts to ensure that all newly installed valves (ottrer than
sampling and instrumentation valves in service on piping with a diameter of 5/8"
or less) are fitted, prior to installation, with Certified low-Leaking Valves or
Certified Low-Leaking Valve Packing Technology ("CLLT').
During the most recent Third Party LDAR Audit, the fbllowing observations
were made:
207 newly added valves were identified within the database as not meeting
certified low leak technology requirements.
76 newly added valve records did not include low leak technology certifications.
180 existing but not previously identified valves were added to the LDAR
program but do not include low leak technology certifications.
Moolry lts purchaslng procedures to ensurethat
the BWO Refinery evaluates the availability of
valves and valve packing that meets the
requirements for a Certified low-Leaking
Valve or Certified Low- Leaking Valve Packing
Technology at the time that the valves, valve
packing and/or equipment is acquired for the
BWO Refinery.
1r0l.b.(2)BWO modified its purchasing procedures to ensure that the BWO Refinery
evaluates the availability of valves and valve packing that meets the requirements
for a Certified Low-Leaking Valve or Certified Low-Leaking Valve Packing
Technology at the time that the valves, valve packing and/or equipment is
acquired for the BWO Refinery. BWO Refinery has developed an Approved
Manufacturers List ("AML') of Valve & Packing OEMs with products that meet
the ConsentDecree definition of Certified Low-Leaking Technology.
Evaluation ofpotential additional control measures in response to the
observations noted in tll0l.b.(l) is underway.
uorrrmerclal unavaltablllw. Ewu snall not be
required to utilize a CLLT to replace or repack a
valve if a CLLT is commercially unavailable, in
accordance with the provisions of Appendix B.
tltu l.c.Not apphcable tbr thrs reportrng perrod.
lI t wu exerclses ule uommercral
Unavailability Exception under fl I 0 l.c. for any
valve, then BWO shall report the information
in ![ 01 .d in the Serni-Annual Reports required
under Part IX (Reportingand Record Keeping)
BWO shall also install the valve(s) or packing
technology it has identified to be commercially
available that comes closest to meeting Certified
Low-Leaking Valve or Certified Low-Leaking
Valve Packins Technoloev requirements.
lT10 r.d.Not applcaole tor mrs reporfing penod.
Onsoine Assessment of Avaiiabilitv. BWO
may use a prior determination of Commercial
Unavailability of avalve orvalve packing
pursuant to this Paragraph and Appendix B for a
subsequent Commercial Unavailability claim
for the same valve or valve packing (or valve or
valve packing in the same or similar service),
provided that the previous determination was
completed within the preceding l2-month
period. After one (1) year, BWO must conduct a
new assessmentofthe availability ofa valve or
valve packing meeting Certified Low-Leaking
Valve or Certified Low-Leaking ValvePacking
Technology requirements.
'tfl 0 l.e.As applicable for this reporting period, BWO has not utilized the commercially
unavailable exception, inaccordance with ttre provisions of Appendix B,
therefore the requirements for an Ongoing Assessment of Availability are not
applicable to the facility at this time.
Calibration/Calibration Drift Assessment.fl102 See below.
Calibration. BWO or its contactor shall conduct
all calibrations of LDAR monitoring equipment
using methane as thecalibration gas, in
accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 60, App. A,
EPA ReferenceTest Method 21. BWO shall
maintain records of the instrument calibrations
required by this Paragraph for the duration of
the Consent Decree.
'lll02.a.BWO LDAR conhactors conduct all calibrations of LDAR monitoring equipment
using methane as the calibration gas, in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 60, App.
A, EPA Reference Test Method 2l .
BWO maintains records of the instument calibrations required by this Paragraph
for the duration of the Consent Decree.
Consent Dccrec, U.S. v. Big Wst Oil LLC, Case l: I l-cv-00121 -BCWS
Semi-Amual hogress Report
July 01, 2023, through Decemb€r 31, 2023 96-Eln/-1470 Page l5 ofl9
Calibration Drift Assessment. BWO or its
contractor shall conduct calibration drift
assessments of LDAR monitoring equipment
at the end of each monitoring shift, at a
minimum. The calibration drift assessment
shall be conducted using, at a minimum, a
500-ppmcalibration gas. If any calibration
drift assessment after theinitial calibration
shows a negative drift ofmore than 100/o from
the previous calibration, BWO shall re-
monitor all valves that were monitored since
the last calibration that had a reading greater
than 100 ppm and shall re-monitor all pumps
that were monitored since the last calibration
that had a readins sreater than 500 oom.
'11102.b.BWO LDAR contractors conduct cahbratron drrtt assessments of LDAR
monitoring equipment at the end of each monitoring shift at a minimum. The
calibration drift assessment is conducted using, a 500 ppm, a 2,000 ppm, and
a I 0,000-ppm calibration gas. If any calibration drift assessment after the
initial calibration shows a negative drift of more than 10% fiom the previous
calibration, BWO requires the LDAR contractors re-monitor all valves that
weremonitored since the last calibration that had a reading greater than 100
ppm and re-monitor all pumps that were monitored since the last calibration
that had a reading greater than 500 ppm.
Delay of Repair. For any equipment for which
BWO is allowed, under 40 CFR $ 60.482-9(a),
to place on the "delay ofrepair" list for repair,
BWO shall:
,l1l03.See below.
For all equipment, BWO shall:!f 103.a.See below.
Require sign-off by the unit supervisor that the
piece of equipment is technically infeasible to
repair without a process unit shutdown, before
the component is eligible for inclusion on the
"delay ofrepair" list; and
11103.a.( 1)The unit supervisor signs-off any piece of equipment that ts techntcally
unfeasible to repair without a process unit shutdown, before the component is
listed on the "delay ofrepair".
Include equipment that is placed on the "delay
of repair" list in the regular LDAR monitoring
program. For leaks above the intemal leak
definition rate and below the regulatory rate,
BWO shall have thirty (30)days to put ttre
equioment on the delav of reoair list.
fl103.a.(2)Equipment that is placed on the "delay of repair" list is included in the regular
LDAR monitoring program.
For valves, other than control valves, leaking at
a rate of 10,000 ppm or greater and which
cannot be repaired using traditional techniques,
BWO shall use the "drill and tap" or similarly
effective repair method for fxing such leaking
valves, rather than placing the valve on the
"delay of repair" list, unless BWO can
demonstrate that there is a safety, mechanical,
or major environmental concem posed by
repairing the leak in that manner. BWO shall
perform a frst, and ifnecessary, a second, "drill
and tap" (or equivalent) repair method within
thirty (30)days after detecting aleak of10,000
DDm or sreater:
lTl03.b.( 1)BWO, per the provisions ol'40 CFR $ 60.482-9(a), places equlpment on the
"delay of repair" list for repair. BWO Refinery requiles sign-off by the unit
supervisor that the piece of equipment is technically infeasible to repair without
aprocess unit shutdown before the component is eligible for inclusion on the
"delay of repair" list; and equipment that is placed on the "delay of repair" list is
included in the regular LDAR monitoring progam. For valves, other than
control valves, leaking at a rate of 10,000 ppm or greater and which cannot be
repaired using raditional techniques, BWO uses the "drill and tap" or similarly
effective repair method for fxing such leaking valves, rather than placing the
valve on the "delay of repair" list, unless BWO can demonstrate that there is a
safety, mechanical, or major environmental concern posed by repairing the leak
in that manner.
After two unsuccessful attempts to repair a
leaking valve through the "drill and tap" or
similarly effective repair method, BWO may
place tlre leaking valve on its "delay ofrepair"
list. BWO shall advise EPA prior to
implementing repair methods equivalent to "drill
and tap" if such method develops for repairing
valves.
lTl03.b.(2)BWO uses its best effort to perlorm a first, and if necessary, a second, "drill and
tap" (or equivalent) repair method within thirty (30) days after detecting a leak
of 10,000 ppm or greater; only after two unsuccessful attempts to repair a
leaking valve drrough the "drill and tap" or similarly effective repair method, are
the leaking valve placed on the "delay ofrepair" list.
@ls_LeaKers. EWU snall replace or repacK
all non- control valves that are'thronic leakers"
during the next process unit turnaround. A
chronic leaker shall be defined as any
component which leaks above 10,000 ppmin
any two quarters between refrnery fumarounds
durine the life of the Consent Decree.
lll u4.BWO replaces or repacks all non-contol valves ttrat are "chronic leakers"
duringthe next process unit hrmaround. A chronic leaker has been defined as
any component which leaks above 10,000 ppm in any two quarters between
refinery tumarounds during the life of the ConsentDecree.
Kecord l(eeDins and l(eDortrns
Reouirements for this Part V.L. BWO shall
include the following information in their semi-
annual progress reports.
'lll u).See below.
First Serni-Annual Progress Report Due under
Consent Decree.
fl105.a see below.
Consnt Decree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Case I :1 3-cv-00121 -BCWS
Semi'Amual Proges Report
July 01, 2023, through December 3 l, 2023 96-ENV-1470 Pagel6ofl9
I lrst semr-Annual rrogress KeDort lor the
Calendar Year. BWO shall include an
identification ofeach audit that was conducted
pursuant to the requirements of fl92 in the
previous calendar year including an
identification of the auditors, a summary of the
audit results,and a summary of the actions that
BWO took or intends to take to correct all
deficiencies identified in the audits, pursuant to
fl93.
tTl0s.b Not applicable for ttris reporting period.
If applicable forreporting period information included in Attachment 4.
MACT Subpart CC Reporting. In each report
dueunder 40 C.F.R. $ 63.655, BWO shall
include CD LDAR Reporting Requirements of
this section.
!f 105.c.BWO has included the CD LDAR Reporting requirements in the LDAR MACT
CC Reporting. Please reference the 2od Semiannual Report for 2023 dated
January 15,2024.
Agancies to Receive Reports, Plans and
Certifications Required in this Parq Number of
Copies. BWO shall submit all reports, plans
and certifications required to be submitted
under this Part to EPA and UDEO.
f106.BWO continues to submit all reports, plans and certifications required to be
submitted under this Part to EPA and UDEQ.
PartV.M. - INCORPORATION OF CD REOUIREMENTS INTO FEDERALLY ENTORCEABLE PERMITS.
CD
Reference Status/Comment
. Incorporate emission limits and standards
into Minor or Major NSRpermits or other
permits (other than Title V permits) which
are federally enforceable.
o Incorporate the requirements of those
permits into the Title V permit as set forth
is fll09.. Emission Limits and Standards as set forth
in lfl 11.a. shall constitute emission limits
and standards that shall survive termination
of the CD by virtue of being incorporated
into federallv enforceable oermits
,llv.M.l07-
111
BWO remains current with submittal of applications of incorporating Emission
Limits and Standards as set forth in fll I I .a. of the Consent Decree into federally
enforceable permis.
PartV.I. - EMISSION CREDIT GENERATION.
CD
Reference Status/Comment
lJwu ls pronlblted Irom usmg errusslons
reductions that will result from the
installation and operation ofthe controls
required by this CD for the purpose of
emissions nettins or emissions offsets.
lTV.r.l l2-
tt4
PartVJI. - MODIFICATIONS.
ct)
Reference Status/Comment
Material modifications to this CD will be in
writing, signed by the parties and will be
effective upon approval by the court.
tN/.II.] ls Not applicable for this reporting period.
Part V.[I. - SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT.
CD
Reference Status/Comment
BWU shall lmplement the sEP.,TV.II.1l6-
126
The SEP was submitted May 5, 2014, and is being implemented at the BWO
Rehnery.
Con*nt Decree, U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Case l:13-cv-0012 I-BCWS
Se mi-Amul Pro$ess Report
July 0I, 2023, through December 31,2023 96-ENV-1470 PagelTofl9
PartV.X. - REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING.
Ul,
Reference Status/Comment
IWO shall submit to EPA and UDEQ a progress
eport containing the following information:
1ltt t See below.
jeneral. Each Report shall contam: a progress
'eport on the implementation of the requirements
lf Part V (Affirmative Relief,{Environmental
)rnienfc'\'
fl27.a.(t\See this semi-annual report.
\. summary of the emissions data that is
;pecifically required by the reporting requirements
)fPart V ofthis CD for the period covered by the
fli27.a.(2)See this semi-annual report and the quarterly CEMs SEDR submittals for the
current reporting period.
\ description of anyproblems antlclpated wrth
espect to meeting the requirements of Part V of
his CD.
fl127.a.(3\None for this reporting period.
\ description of the status of the SEP being
:onducted at the Refinery under Part VIII: and
lt27.a.$)The SEP project was submitted to the EPA and UDEQ on May 5, 2014. BWO
comolies with the SEP.
{.ny additional matters as BWO believes should be
rrought to the attention of EPA and UDEQ.
fl27.a.(5)In January 2024,the Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) requested BWO
resubmit amended SEDR reports from Q3 2021 ttrrough Q3 2023. Data included
in this report reflects the Q3 2023 SEDR report submitted to UDAQ on October
27,2023.
lmissions Data. In each semi-annual report
'equired to be submitted on July 3l of each year,
IWO shall provide a summary of annual emissions
lata at the refinery for the prior calendar year. The
iummary shall include estimates and/or
:alculations of:
.[,t27.b.If aoolicable forreoortins oeriod information included in Attachment 1.
{Ox ernissions in tpy for each heater and boiler
yeater than 40 mmBTU/h maximum fired duty;
11127.b.(1)See comment in fll27.b.
\Ux emrsslons m tpy as a sum tor aII heaters and
roilers less than 40 mmBTUlr maximum fired
firfw'
T27.b.(2)See corffnent m'lll27.b.
iOz, CO, and PM emlsslons ln tpy as a sum tbr all
raofm cnrl hnilctc'
nr27.b.(3)See comment in'!T127.b.
JOz emissions from SRU in tpy;$27.b.(4)See comment lr:,fl127.b.
iOz emissions tiom all AG F'tanng and I'G
ncidents by flare in tpy;
fl127.b.(5)See comment in 1T127.b.
rlOx, SO2, PM, and C() emrssrons m tpy as a sum
br all other ernissions units for which emissions
nformation is required to be included in the
bcility's annual emissions summaries and that are
rn+ idmtificd ahnrre'
fl127.b.(6)See comment rn !f127.b.
iO2, NOx, CO, and PM emissions m tpy tbr the
ICCU, and
fi27.b.(7)See comment ti'1127.b.
ior each of the estimates or calculations in
J127.b.(1) through fl127.b.(7) above, the basis for
he emissions estimate or calculation (i.e. stack
ests, CEMs, emission factor, etc.). To the extent
hat the required emissions summary data are
rvailable in other reports generated by BWO, such
rther reports can be attached, or ttre appropriate
nformation can be exffacted from such other
eports and attached to the semi-annual report to
atisfu the r@uirement.
fl127.b.(8)See comment in !f 127.b.
ixceedances of Enussrons Lmlts. ln each seil[-
nnual reporl BWO shall identify each exceedance
rf an emission limit required or established by this
lD that occurred during the previous semi-annual
reriod and, for any emissions unit subject to a limit
equired or established by this CD that is monitored
ry a CEMs, any periods of CEMs downtime that
rccurred during the semi-annual period. For each
xceedance and/or each period of CEMs downtime.
]WO shall include the followins information:
llrz t.c.See 'l able below.
Consent Decree, U.S. v. Big Wct Oil LLC, Ca$ l:13-cv-00121-BCWS
Semi-Amul hogres Repofl
July 01, 2023, through December 3 l, 2023 96-ENV-1470 Pagel8ofl9
CD Emissions Limits Averaging
Period
CD
Reference
3"d Quarter 2023 4th Quarter 2023
Excccdarc€s
% ofQr.% otQtr.
Exceedames
% ofQtr.% ofQtr.
N(Jx 40 DDmvd NUxat UYo ()2 - IUUU JO)-dayRA v.A.12.1 3 o ooo/"
t.93%
0.00%
0.09%NOx 60 onmvd NOxat0%Oz-FCCU 7-dav RA QV.A. l2 0.(Xl9lo 0.00%
SOz25 oomvdSO2 atOYo 02 - FCCL 365-davRA \v.B.t5-t4 0.(x)%o
2.17%
0.00%
0.09%SOz 50 oomvd SOZ at OYo 02 - FCCU /-dav KA \t.b.2J-24 U.UU"/o O.0tJ"/o
CO500 DDmvd CO ato' ()2 - FCCU l -hour \t.D.5\O.U9Yo 0.00%1.22%
H2s I Ol DDm tl/D - KenntrV ruel UaS 3-hour v -H-4?t 0.1 8%
6.31%
0_00%
0.23o/oH2S O(, nnm HZS- t(eflnervluel (ras 3 65-day v.H.4E 0.00%0.00%
H2J IOZ ppm - U. rlare vent uas J -nour Q V.J.)y.a o.63%6.47%0.00%1.45v,
H2S l02 ppm - W. tlare Vent Uas ,-noul v.J.f v.a 1.04%6.34%0.05%4.26%
91"/o KeCOVeTV l'.IIlClenCV - SKP 30-day RA v-t-lJ o.tJtJ'4.46"U.UU70 U.66"/o
F.xceedances of f,'.mission I.imits - EIX. 127.c
Part IX.127.c.(1)(a).(c) - Duration of Exceedance(s) and Downtime as 7o of OoeratinsTime perOuarter
PartIX.127.c.(l)ft)-If OperatingUnitExceededLimitmorethan l%of TotalTimeperOuarter
If applicable for reporting period additional information included in Attachment 5
Part IX.l27.c.(l Xd) - If CEMS Downtime Exceeded more than 5% of Total Time per Ouarter
If applicable for reporting period additional information included in Attachment 5
Part IX.127.c.(l)(c) - Duration of the CEMS Downtime %o of OperatineTime perOuarter
Process Unit CEMS Downtime
(t70/"
Downtime
o40/"
MSCC (FCC NOX 1.93o/o 0.09%
MSCC (ICC 02 1.72o/o 0.09%
MSCC (FCC so2 2.170/"0.09o/o
MSCC (FCC CO 1 7?-o/"I 220/"
Amin e H2S 6.11o/"0.2\o/"
S. Flare H2S 6.470/"I .450/"
W. Flare H2S 6.34V"4.260/o
SRU so2 4.86%0.68%
END OF REPORT
Page 19ofl9
Consent Decree, U.S. v. Big Wst Oil LLC, Ca* l:13-cv-00121-BCWS
Semi-Amual ho$e$ Report
July 01,2021, lhrough December 3 I, 2023 96-ENV-t470
Attachment 1
Attachments Related to Emissions Reportine of Part V (Affirmative Relief/Environmental Proiects)
Attachments related to emissions reporting and stack tests demonstrating compliance with emissions limits.
The followine hformation is included in this attachment:
o Summary of Emissions Data for the prior CY - QIX. 127.b. (included in the first Semi-annual progress
report ofeach year)
o Not applicable for the current reporting period.
o FCCU Resen PM Stack Test Report for the test conducted on December 15. 2023
U.S. v. Big West Oil LLC, Ce l:13+v40l2l-BCWS
ColMl Dqe ScDi-Amual Prcgrc R€pon
July l, 2023, thrcugh Dcmbq 31, 2023
Source Test
Big West Oil, LLC
333 West Center Street
North Salt Lake, UT 84054
Sources"Iested: MSCC
Test Date: December 15,2023
Proj ect No. AST-2023 -4280
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
pul6lrpEr
TECI.'i NICAL GROI]P Source Test Report
Test Program Sttmmary
Regulatorv Information
Permit No.
Regulatory Citations
Source Information
Approval Order DAQE - AN l0 122007 7 -22
40 CFR 60, Subpart J, Subpart Ja
40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU
Utah SIP IX.H. l.g.i.B.I
Source Name
MSCC
Target Parameters
PM1O, PM2.5
Contact Information
Test Location
Big West Oil, LLC
333 West Center Street
North Salt Lake, UT 84054
Brady Miller
brady.miller@bigwestoil. com
(38s) 324-t27s
Faithe Schwartzengraber
faithe. sc hwart zengr ab er @bi gwestoi l. com
[phone]
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
wesr valley ciry, uT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@alliancetg. com
(352) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Alan Jensen
alan [e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. [e-mail]
(812) 452-478s
Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine.spangler@alliancetg. com
Analytical Laboratory
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
5530 Marshall Street
Arvada, CO 80002
Eric Grosjean
eric. grosj ean@alliancetg. com
(303\ 420-s949
AST-20234280
I of65
Page iBWO - North Salt Lake, Utah
put6rrce
Source Test Report
C e r I ifi cati o n Sta t e,ne n tTECHNICAL GROUP
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved intemal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
Charles llorton, QSTI
Project Manager
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
1t16t2024
Date
BWO -North Salt Lake, UtahAST-2023-4280
2of65
Page ii
put6rpe
TECI''INICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Source and Control System Descriptions. ........... 1-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ................... ................... l-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2 -Volumetric Flow Rate ............. 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide........ .......... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content......... ....................... 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 58 and 202-Total Particulate Matter.......... ................3-2
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A................ ......3-2
LIST OF'TABLES
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Laboratory Data
Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-20234280
3 of65
Page iiiBWO - North Salt Lake, Utah
4 of65
pul6rpe
Source Test Report
IntroductionTECI-JNICAL GROUP
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Big West Oil, LLC (BWO) to conduct compliance
testing at the North Salt Lake, Utah rehnery. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Subpart
J, Subpart Ja, and 40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU. The facility operates under the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Approval Order (AO) DAQE-AN101220077-22. Compliance testing
included determining the emission rates of particulate matter (PM), particulate matter less than 10 microns (PMl0)
and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) at the exhaust of the MSCC.
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
The MSCC is a type of Fluid Catallic Cracking (FCC) process that converts heavy crude oil fractions into lighter,
more valuable hydrocarbon products at high temperature and moderate pressure in the presence of a finely divided
silica/alumina-based catalyst. In the course of cracking large hydrocarbon molecules into smaller molecules, a
nonvolatile carbonaceous material, commonly referred to as coke, is deposited on the catalyst. The coke laid down
on the catalyst acts to deactivate the catalytic cracking activity of the catalyst by blocking access to the active
catalytic sites. In order to regenerate the catalytic activity of the catalyst, tle coke deposited on the catalyst is bumed
off with air in the regenerator vessel.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by BWO.
BWO Personnel
Brady Miller
Eric Simdom
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen
Xander Krahn
AST-20234280
5 of65
Page l-lBWO - North Salt Lake, Utah
6 of65
plllffiircEr
ii ..) i.J l')Sourca Test Rcporl
Swnmary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alfiance conducted compliance testing at the BWO facility in North Salt Lake, Utah on December 15, 2023.
Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Subpart J, Subpart Ja, and 40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU.
The facility operates under UDAQ AO DAQE-AN101220077-22. Compliance testing included determining the
emission rates of PM, PMl0 and PM2.5 at the exhaust of the MSCC.
Table 2-l provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ permit
limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table(s) and the detailed results
contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results
Run Number Run I Run 2 Run 3 Averase
Dat6 t2t1st23 12ll5t23 t2ilsl23
loke Burn off Rate, lb/hr I 0,1 99 9,996 t0,052 10,082
F ilterable Particulate Matter Data
Concentration, grain/dscf
Emission Rate, lb,rtrr
Emission Factor, lb/I,000 lbs Coke Burned
Emission Limit, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned
Percent of Limit, 7o
0.00081
0.24
0.024
0.00082
0.24
0.024
0.00047
0.14
0.014
0.00070
0.21
0.020
1.0
2
Condensable Particulate Matter Data
Concentration, grain/dscf
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned
0.0022
0.66
0.06s
0.0021
0.79
0.079
0.0017
0.51
0.050
0.0022
0.65
0.065
Total Particulate Matter Data t
Concentration, grain/dscf
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Factor, lb/1,000 lbs Coke Burned
Emission Limit, lb/l,000 lbs Coke Burned
Percent of Limit, 7o
0.0030
0.90
0.088
0.003s
1.03
0.103
0.0022
0.65
0.064
0.0029
0.86
0.085
1.0
9
)xygen Data
Concentration, 7o 1.00 t.l0 t.20 Ll0
Carbon Dioxide Data
Concentration, %o 17 40 17.10 17.00 17.17
rTotal PM is the summation of filterable PM and condensable PM.
AST-2023-4280
7 of65
Page 2-lBWO - North Salt Lake, Utah
8 of65
trs*PsAlh
i:i- l:iili'i Sotrce Tesl Rcport
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 - Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocify pressure, static pressure, and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measllred with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3,A.. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisfure from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
The relative accuracy of the Oz CEMS were determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
Performance Specifi cation 3.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the
same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
BWO - Nonh Salt Lake, Utah
Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis
Moisfure Contenl 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Total Particulate Matter 5B &202 Isokinetic Sampling
AST-20234280
9 of65
Page 3-l
pulffiipe
TECIIN'CAL GfiOt]?Source Test Report
Testing Methodologt
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 58 and 202 -Total Particulate Matter
The total particulate matter (filterable and condensable PM) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Methods 58 and 202. The complete sampling system consisted of a glass nozzle, glass-lined probe,
oven-dried at 160 +5 'C (320 +10 oF), pre-weighed quartz filter, coil condenser, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas
conditioning train, pump, and calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning train consisted of a coiled condenser
and four (4) chilled impingers. The first and second impingers were initially empty, the third contained 100 mL of
de-ionized water and the last impinger contained 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter
was placed between the second and third impingers. The probe liner and filter heating systems were maintained at a
temperature of 160 * l4oC (320 t25"F) and the impinger temperahre were maintained at 20oC (68oF) or less
throughout the testing.
Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train was leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than or
equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. If condensate was collected in the first dry impinger,
then the front-half of the sample train (the nozzle, probe, and heated pre-weighed filter) was removed in order to
purge the back-half of the sample train (coil condenser, first and second impingers and CPM filter). A glass bubbler
was inserted into the first impinger. If needed, de-ionized ultra-f,rltered (DIUF) water was added to the first impinger
to raise the water level above the bubbler, then the coil condenser was replaced. Zero nitrogen was connected to the
condenser, and a 60-minute purge at 14 liters per minute was conducted. After the completion of the nitrogen purge
the impinger contents were measured for moisture gain. The nitrogen purge was omitted if minimal condensate was
collected in the dry impingers.
The pre-weighed quartz filter was carefully removed and placed in container 1. The probe, nozzle and front half of
the filter holder was rinsed three (3) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate matter and these rinses
were recovered in container 2. All containers were sealed, labeled, and liquid levels marked for transport to the
identif,red laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis.
The contents of impingers I andZ were recovered in container CPM Cont. #1. The back half of the filterable PM
filter holder, the coil condenser, impingers I and 2 and all connecting glassware were rinsed with DIUF water and
then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #l while the
solvent rinses were recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter was removed from the filter holder and
placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder was rinsed with DIUF water
and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse was added to container CPM Cont. #l while the solvent
rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers were sealed, labeled, and liquid levels marked for
ffansport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced dtectly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once lhe aralyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv lYo absolute difference.
BWO - North Salt Lake, UtahAST-2023-4280
10 of65
Page 3-2
pul6rrce
TECIINICAL GRCTJIT Source Test Report
Testing Methodologt
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppmvlo/o (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the aralyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-
Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppmvlo/o or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever
was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded.
The measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias
was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference.
High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/o/o absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
System Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each
traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/0.3% (whichever
was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test
runs. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmv/O.5%o from the average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in
diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0,
and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 1.0
ppmv/0.Soh from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse
points. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the AST server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team Leader
before leaving the facility. Once arriving at AST's office, all written and electronic data was relinquished to the
report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
BWO - North Salt Lake, UtahAST-2023-4280
11 of65
Page 3-3
12 of 65
ff6rce
TECHN:CAL GFIOUP
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
MSCC
Bis West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
20234280
PNryCPM
Example
Appendix A
Calculations
Meter Presurc (Pm), itr. Hg
AHPm = Pb+-
where. 1'3'6
Pb 26.10 = buometric pressue, in. Hg
AH 1.442 = pressure differential oforifice, in H2O
P.--I6i-=io.Hg
Absolute Stack G{s Pressure (Ps), ln. Hg
Po
Ps = Ph + '6
where, 13,6
Pb 26.10 = buometric pressue, in. Hg
Pg 0.07 = static pressue, in. H2O
Ps....A=in'Hg
Stendrrd Meter Volume (Vmstd), drcf
77.636xYxVmxPmVmstd:
where,TmY 0.985 = meter erection factor
v-@=metervolme. cf
P^ 2621 = absolute meter pressure. in. Hg
Tm 526.6 = absolute meter tempemture, oR
vmstd--ffi-=d""f
Statrdrrd Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
Vwstd = 0.04776x Ylc
where,
Vlc '18.6 = weight of H2O collected, g
v*ttdTdil=r"f
,oosz-(t'ffi)
Moisture Frrctiotr (BWSsat), dim€nsionlN (thmretic8l !t srturated conditions)
BWSsat =
where,
Ts 499,6 = stack tempffiture, 'F
Ps 26.11 = absolute stack 96 pressue, in. Hg
BWSsat 48.027 = dimereionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured)
Vwstd
(Vwstd * Vmstd)
Vwstd_l]!]_: stmdild wet volme, scf
Vmstd 36.332 : standild meter volume, drcf
BWS 0.093 = dimensionless
Moisture Fnctior (BWS), dimctrsiodess
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
wherc'
BWSsat 48.0, = moistrc fraction (thmretical al sahmted conditions)
BWSmsd 0.093 _= moisture frution (mesured)Bws-6:d!5_
Ps
BWS =
where.
l3 of65
anErrce
TECHNICAL GROUP
Bie West Oil. LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
MSCC
20234280
PM/CPM
Example
Appendix A
Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No,:
Parameter:
Molccular W€ight (DRY) (Md), lb^b-mole
1v14 = (0.4a x 0/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- o/oCO2 - o/oOZ))
whcre.
CO, L= carbon dioxide concentration, To
OrA- oxygen concentration, o/o
Md 30.82 = lbAb mol
Molsular Weighi (WET) (Ms), lbilb.mole
Ms = Md (1 - BWS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
moleulu weight (DRY), Ib,4b mol
0.093 = moistrre fration, dimensionless
29-64 = lb/lb mol
Average Velocity (Vs), fvs6
= 85.49 x Cp x (A p 1/2) avg x
Cp 0.840
LP''' 0.366
rs-----!56J-Ps 26.1 IMs 29.61vs......E
= pitot tube coefficient
Average Stack Gar Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), rcfm
Qa:60xVsxAs
where,
Vr-22:]-= stack g6 velocity, ff/sec
As 45.66 = cross-sctional m ofstack, ft2
Qa-3TJF=r"f,
Average Stack Grs Flow at Standsrd Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.636 x Qa x (1 - BWS) x *where,
Qu ___!W]__ = avenge stack gas flow at stack conditions, lcfm
BWS 0.093 : moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ps 26.11 = absolute stack gs pressre, in. Hg
Ts 959.3 = abmlute stack tempemtue,'R
Qs_!ry_=dscf-
Dry Gu Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimersionless
Y_
Md
BWS
Ms
Vs
where,
= velocity head ofstack gro. (in. H2O)ra
: absolute stack tempemtwe, oR
= absolute stack go pressue, in. Hg
= molmlu weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
= ft/src
(***.)
Yqa =
where,
x 100
Y
Y 0.985 - met{ omction factor, dimemionless
O 60 : m time, min.
Ym 42.026 = total meter volume, dcf
Tm 526.6 = absolute metq tempeBture, 'R
AH@ 1.E43 : orifice meter calibmtion coemcietrt, in. H2O
Pb 26.10 = brometric pressue, in. Hg
1.442
30.82
1.200
05
AH avg
Md
(A H)'2
Yqa
= avenge pressue differential of orifice, in H2O
: molrcuh weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
= av@ge sluarmot pressrc diffffitial of orifice, (in. H2o)ti'?
= pscent
14 of65
All6rce
TECHNICAL GROUP
Location: Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source: MSCC
Project No.: 2023-4280
Run No.: I
Parameter: PM/CPM
Yolume of Nozle (Vn), ft3
Ts / Vm xPmxY\Vn = E; (0.002669 xVlc * r_ I
wherq
Ts 959 .3 : absolute stack tempmhre, 'R
Ps 26.11 = absolute stack gd pressue, in. Hg
Vlc 7E.6 = volme of H2O collrcted, ml
v ------ffi- = meter volme, cf
Pm 26.21 = absolute meter prcssure, in. Hg
y --6f-: meter corrction factor, mitless
Tm 526.6 = absolute meter lempemture, oR
Vn 83-408 = volume ofnozle, ft3
Isokinetic Sampling Rate (D, 7o
t:(
where,
PMR
FR
El'""
= filtemble PM emission Bte, lb/Itr
= prccess fed mte, lb,tr
= lb/klb coke bmed
Vn
)*rooAx60xAnxVs
vn 83.408 = nozle volume, ft3
o.f,6:6-= ru timc, minuts
An 0.00079 = aroof nozle, ft2
Vs 29.3 = avoage velocity, fusec
r-----iod3-= z
Filtenbl€ PM Concentration (CJ, grain/dscf
- Mn x 0.0154
vs - Vmstd
where,
Mn 1.9 _= filtemble PM mass, mg
V-rtd --JElJSf- = standud meter volume, dsf
c. --i6ol-- : grain/dscf
Filterrble PM Emission Rate (PMR), lb/hr
PMR =
where,
c,
Qs
PMR
C"xQsx60
7.08 + 03
= filterable PM concentration, gmin/drcf
34,917 = avemge stack gu flow at stmdild conditions, dscfm
O.24 = lb/tr
Filtenble PM Emissiotr Factor (EFPM), lb/klb coke burtred
PMRx 1.08+03
EFpu =FR
0.24
-m233-0.02
wherq
Cotrdensrbl€ PM Cotrcentrrtion (Cc?M), grair/dscf
Mcpu x 0.0154
UCPM _
Vmstd
M.r"__jl_: condewble PM mres, mg
Vmsrd-Ill]L= stmdud meter volume, dscf
C"r*1!fu- grain/dscf
where,
l5 of65
anl6rrce
TECHN]
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
CAL GROUP
Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Appendix A
Example Calculations
MSCC
20234280
PM/CPM
Condensable PM Emission Rrt€ (ERcpM), lb/hr
Ccppr x Qsxeoff
ERcpu : ?oE+03-
where,
C.r, ____1!!!Z_ = condensable PM concmtratiou grair/dscf
Qs 34,917 = avmge stack gas flow at stmdud conditions, d*ftn
ERcpu 0.66 = lb/hr
Cordensblc PM Emisslon Factor @FcpM), Ibftlb coke bumed
ER",ux 1.08+03
. EFcpu = ---- rRwnere,
ER.p"_A= condensable PM emission mte, [b/hr
FR 10,233 = prmcs fed mte, lbAu
EFcpM 0.06 : lb/klb coke bmed
Toaal PM Concentration (Cpy), grrin/dscf
Crpu=Cs+CcpM
where,
C" 0.0008 = filt€mble PM concstration, gBir/dscf
C"rr____!!94_= condmsable PM concotration, grain/dscf
C*" ____9.09i9_ = grain/dscf
Total PM Emtusion Rate (ERrpM), lb/hr
ERrpu:PMR+ERcpM
where,
PMR______9?1_= filtmble PM emission Bte, lb/hr
ER.I"A= condensable PM emission Bte, lb/hr
ERpy 0.90 = lb/hr
Totll PM Emission Rate (ERrpMrpy), lb/klb coke bumed
ERrpMx 1.08+03
EFrpu =
wherq
FR
0.90 = total PM mission Bte, lb/hrERrp,
FR
EFr"u
10,233 : process feed mte, lb/hr
0.09 = lb&lb coke bwed
l6 of65
llltElnse
TEOHNICAL CIFlOUP
Location: Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Source: MSCC
Project No.: 20234280
Run No. /lVlethod Run I / Method 3A
Oz - Outlet Concentration (Co), oh dry
Co,: (Cou,-Cr)* ( #")
where,Cob, 1.3 : average analyzer value during test, %o dry
C" --Cil- : average of pretest & posttest zero response s, Yo dry
CMA-TIF: actual concentration of calibration gas,Yo dry
CM-T0l8-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry
Co,-T3-: Oz Concentration,%o dry
COr - Outlet Concentration (CcoJ, Yo dry
Cco": (Cou,-Co)* ( fr;)
where,
Cob, 16.8 :averagearalyzervalueduringtest,o/odry
C"
-OJi-:
average of pretest & posttest zero response s, Yo dry
Cr,4,{-T0-: actual concentration of calibration gas,Yo dry
CM-f0-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, 0/o dry
C*,-fr-: COz Concentration, %o dry
l7 of65
l8 of65
putfripe
TECHNICAI G:tC}I"JP
Emission Calculations
Location Bis West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Source MSCC
Project No. 2023-4280
Parameter PM/CPM
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averaqe
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
Run Time,mrn
tzlt5/23
12:52
l3:58
60.0
tzn5t23
15:05
16:15
60.0
t2/15123
16:40
17:51
60.0 60.0(e)
INPUTDATA
loke Bum Rate, lb/hr
Baromeffic Pressure, in. Hg
Meter Correction Factor
)rifice Calibration Value
\{eter Volume, ft3
Meter Temperature, oF
\4eter Temperature, oR
Vleter Orifice Pressure, in. WC
Volume H2O Collected, mL
\,lozzle Diameter, in
A.rea of Nozzle, ft2
lilterable PM Mass, mg
londensable PM Mass, mg
9,996
26.10
0.985
1.843
41.360
67.3
527.0
1.400
90.2
0.380
0.0008
1.9
6.3
(FR)
(Pb)
(Y)
(^H @)
(vm)
(Tm)
(Tm)
(^H)
(Vlc)
(Dn)
(An)
(Mn)
(Mcpu)
10,199
26.10
0.985
1.843
42.026
66.9
526.6
t.M2
78.6
0.380
0.0008
t.9
5.2
10,052
26.04
0.985
1.843
4t.367
62.1
521.8
1.425
83.3
0.380
0.0008
1.1
4.0
10,082
26.08
0.985
1.843
41.584
65.4
525.1
1.422
84.0
0.380
0.0008
1.6
5.2
ISOKINETIC DATA
Standard Meter Volume, ff
Standard Water Volume, ftl
Moisture Fraction Measured
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation
Moisture Fraction
Meter Pressure, in Hg
Volume at Nozzle, ft3
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%)
DGM Calibration Check Value, (+/- 5%)
(Vmstd)
(Vwstd)
(BWSmsd)
(BWSsat)
(Bws)
(Pm)
(vn)
(r)
(Y.,)
36.009
3.928
0.098
48.103
0.098
26.14
83.381
100.8
-0.2
36.021
3.963
0.099
47.948
0.099
26.18
83.33
100.9
0.2
36.332
3.707
0.093
48.027
0.093
26.21
83.408
100.5
0.5
35.723
4.254
0.1 06
47.7t4
0.1 06
26.20
83.213
101.5
0.2
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
Filterable PM Concentration, grain/dscf
Filterable PM Emission Rate, lblhr
Filterable PM Emission Factor, lb/klb coke burned
(c.)
(PMR)
(EFor)
0.00081
0.24
0.024
0.00082
0.24
0.024
0.00047
0.14
0.014
0.00070
0.21
0.020
londensable PM Concentration, grain/dscf
londensable PM Emission Rate, lb/tr
londensable PM Emission Factor, lb/klb coke burned
(Ccpr"r)
(ERcpu)
(EF"or)
0.0022
0.66
0.065
0.0027
0.79
0.079
0.0017
0.51
0.050
0.0022
0.65
0.065
Iotal PM Concenhation, grain/dscf
Iotal PM Emission Rate, lb/hr
Iotal PM Emission Factor, lb/klb coke burned
(Crprra)
(ERrpv)
(EFro.)
0.0030
0.90
0.088
0.0035
1.03
0.103
0.0022
0.6s
0.064
0.0029
0.86
0.08s
Underlined values contained one or more fractions below the detection limit; the MDL was used in calculations.
l9 of65
plltffiipe
TECHN:CAL iIROU3
Emission Calculations
Location Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Source MSCC
Project No. 2023-4280
Parameter PM/CPM
lun Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
)ate
Itart Time
itop Time
lun Time,mln
tzlr5l23
12:52
l3:58
60.0
t2lt5l23 l2lt5/23
15:05 16:40
16:15 17:51
60.0 60.0 60.0
VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC
loint I 0.ll 0
loint 2 0.12 0
loint 3 0. 13 0
loint 4 0.14 0
loint 5 0.15 0
loint 6 0.14 0
loint 7 0.13 0
loint 8 0. 13 0
loint 9 0. 15 0
loint l0 0.14 0
lointll 0.14 0
)oint 12 0.13 0
4 0.13 0.
3 0.14 0.
4 0.15 0.
3 0.13 0.
2 0.12 0.
2 0.13 0.
2 0.12 0.
3 0.12 0.
3 0.13 0.
4 0.13 0.
4 0.15 0.
2 0.r4 0.
J
J
4
J
J
J
2
J
4
4
4
J
CALCULATED DATA
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)"-
Pitot Tube Coefircient
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Static Pressure, in. WC
Stack Pressure, in. Hg
Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft'
Iemperature, oF
Iemperature, oR
Moisture Fraction Measured
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation
Moisture Fraction
02 Concentration, o/o
CO2 Concentration,%o
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry)
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet)
Velocity, fl/sec
(^P)
(cp)
(Pb)
(Pe)
(Ps)
(As)
(Ts)
(Ts)
(BWSmsd)
(BWSsat)
(Bws)
(oz)
(Coz)
(Md)
(Ms)
(vs)
0.366
0.840
26.10
0.07
26.11
4s.66
499.6
959.3
0.093
48.027
0.093
1.00
17.40
30.82
29.64
29.3
0.360
0.840
26.10
0.07
26.11
45.66
498.8
958.5
0.106
47.714
0.1 06
l.l0
17.10
30.78
29.42
28.9
0.364
0.840
26.04
0.07
26.05
45.66
499.s
959.2
0.098
48.103
0.098
r.20
17.00
30.77
29.51
29.2
0.363
0.840
26.08
0.07
26.09
45.66
499.3
959.0
0.099
47.948
0.099
l.t0
17.17
30.79
29.52
29.1
VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE
At Stack Conditions, acfm
At Standard Conditions, scfm
At Standard Conditions, dscfm
(Qa)
(Qsw)
(Qs)
80, I 73
38,479
34,917
79,209
38,046
33,997
79,944
38,284
34,5 l8
79,775
38,270
34,477
20 of 65
Al6rce
TECHNICAL f:':lOIJT:
Locrtiotr Bip Wdt Oil, LLC - North Srlt Lrk€. UT
Method L Data
Source IUSCC
Proj.ct No. 2023-42t0
Drtet l2ll3l23
Dmt Orierbtion: Vdical
Dnct lr$ign: Circular
Dishnce fiom Frr \lrll o ouride of Pon:--lii.66--in
Nippte Length: 16.50 ln
D"pth of Du"t, ---M-io
Cross Sectionrl Arcr ofDuct: 45.66 fi'
No- of Tdt Po*: 2
IrtuhceA: 60O I
Dtutrnce A Duct Dbmtcrs: 7.9 (m6t bc > 0.5)
Dlstilce B: 60.0 f,
Dilhce B Duct Dimters:---Jl-(mut bt z 2)
Mirimum Numh.r of Tmvere Points: ----Jf-
Acto.l Nmb6 of Tr.ye^" Poirt, ----J]-
Number of Reading! pe. Point,--l-
Mcsurer (lniii.l snd D"t.), l6RlIii
Reviewer (Iiitial and Drte): sPR 12115
UIKUULffi UUL I
L(rcATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nafrber oJ taeefie poinft on o diamaer
I
3
4
5
5
7
I
9
l0
It
l2
4 I !o lt t2
l4.6
E5.4
6.7
25.O
75.0
4.4
t4.6
29.6
70.4
85.4
es:6
3.2
r0.5
19.4
32.3
67.1
80.6
89.5
96.8
-
2.6
E.2
14.6
34.2
65.8
71.4
85.4
91.8
t
_-o
2.1
6.7
1 r.8
17,7
25.0
35.6
61.4
75.0
E2.3
EE.2
93.3
97.9
*Percent ofstac* dianeterlrom insidewll to tovelse point.
InvcBe
Point
'/" ol
Dlrftt€r
DLtme
hom imide
wrll
ftom
o$ide of
I
3
4
5
6
7
t
I
!0
ll
l2
4.4
14.6
29.6
70.4
85.4
95.6
4.03
13.36
27.08
64.42
78. l4
87:1
20 U2
29 7/8
43 9/16
E0 l5/16
94 58
I r-ua&tmaotrtu(&d.E@.
Sbck Diagam
A=60ft.
B: 60 ft.
Depth ofDuct = 9l.5 in.
Crcs Sdioml Ara
a
o
o
a
a
o
Uprtream
Disturhance
2l of 65
plllffilrce
TEUHNICAL GFIOUP
Cyclonic tr'low Check
Location Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Source MSCC
Project No. 2023-4280
Date l2ll5l23
Sample Point Angle (AP=O)
1
)
3
4
5
6
7
I
9
10
11
t2
Average J
22 of 65
nllffince
T=CIINIUAL TtFlOUP
Method 4 Data
Location Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Source MSCC
Project No. 2023-4280
Parameter PI\,I/CPM
Analysis Gravimetric
Run I Date:t2/ts/23
lmpinger No.I ,3 4 Total
Contents Empty Empty H20 Silica
Initial Mass, g 490.9 637.5 689.9 949.3 2767.6
Final Mass, g 553.6 641.1 687.7 963.8 2846.2
Gain 62.7 3.6 aa t4.5 78.6
Run 2 Date:12/15t23
Impinger No.I 2 3 4 Total
Contents Empty Empty H2o Silica
Initial Mass, g 475.6 645.2 718.4 9r6.0 2755.2
Final Mass, g 541.7 657.8 118.',t 927.2 284s.4
Gain 66.1 12.6 0.3 tt.2 90.2
Run 3 Date:t2/15/23
Impinger No.I 2 3 4 Total
Contents Empty Empty H20 Silica
Initial Mass, g 491.8 640.0 687.7 963.8 2783.3
Final Mass, g 560.0 643.s 689.1 974.0 2866.6
Gain 68.2 3.5 1.4 t0.2 83.3
23 of 65
pllrffirrce
TTCIINICAL GFlOU?lsokinetic Field Data
Strrt Time:
End Tim:
t r.<t
1358
Source: MSCC
Date: l2ll5l23 20234240 Parareter
STACK I)A'l A {IilS-I }EQUIPMENT STACK DATA (EST)FII,TER NO.STACK DATA (FINAL)MOIST. DATA
Moisturei 10.0 Yo est.
Baroretric: 26.10 in. Hg
Static Press: 0.07 in. wC
Stack Press: 26.11 in. Hg
CO2: I1l.O Yo
O2t L5 Yo
Ny'CO: 815 %
Md: 30.78 lb/lb-mote
Ms: 29.50 lb/lb-mole
Meter Bor lD; M5-9Y'TlE-
an 61in.wc;'llIIJ--
Probe ID: Pr709J
Lber Material: glass
Pitot ID: Pr709-l
eitot cprtyp",ilii-fiffi
xoor" ro,EuI6--]-iII-
Nozle DD (in.): 0.380
Est. Tm: 50
Est. Ts: 499 'F
Est. AP: 0.14 in. WC
Est. Dn: 0.401 in.
Tr.qet Rrte: 0.75 scfoi
t697t-C 26.10 in. Hg
0.07 in. WC
t.o %
17.4 %tGffiiai
Pb:
Pg:
or:
co2:
78.6
K.FACTOR
10.263
Final Corr
l.r-AK CHECKI Pre Mid I Mld 2 Mid 3 Pdt Mid I (c0
Mld 2 (cf)
Mid 3 (cf)
L.ek Rrte (cf6): 0.001 - 0.001
vrcu.m (itr Hq): 16 - 5
Pitot Tube: Prss - Pass dtd-Poirt Lerk Chcck vol (cf):
d.i6L
Sample Tire
(minutcs)
Dry Gas Metei
Reading
(ftt)
Pltot
Tube
AP
(ln uC)
Gas Temperatures (cF)Orifice I
AII
(in' \tl
'ress.
c)
PurDp
Vac
(io. Hg)
Gas'l elrMraturcs ("1
% ISO Vs
(rpO
DCM Averase Stack Probe Filter ImErit CPM
Besin End 5l 5l Ideal Actual 5l 5l 5l 5t
A1 0.00 5.00 85.750 0ll 6t 500 r.15 .20 3 322 32t 48 66 100.7 26.59
2 5.00 10.00 88.875 0.12 65 496 1.27 30 3 324 320 50 67 102.7 27 1t
3 10.00 15.00 92.235 0.13 66 499 ]E .40 4 123 322 50 68 100.5 28_89
4 15.00 20.00 95.660 0. l4 69 500 49 50 4 323 t2t 50 68 !00-3 29.99
20 00 25.00 99.22s 0. t5 67 502 .59 60 4 1r,320 50 6S !01 0 3 r.08
6 25 00 30 00 02 920 0t4 67 502 .48 50 4 323 32t 54 68 tol 7 30.02
BI 10.00 35.00 06.51 ot 67 498 .38 .40 4 l,325 55 6'l t0 1.5 28.4-t
35.00 40.00 09.980 0.13 68 498 .38 1.40 4 ,21 325 55 66 100.5 28.87
3 40.00 45.00 3.420 0.15 68 499 60 60 4 122 326 56 66 101.0 31.03
4 45.00 50.00 7.110 0. t4 68 500 49 50 4 121 12'1 56 67 101.0 29.99
5 50.00 55.00 20.710 0. l4 68 500 49 50 4 322 324 67 100 8 29.99
6 55.00 60.00 24.285 0. t3 69 50t 18 40 4 321 320 5',l 69 102.0 28.92
Final DGM:7.776
rs Y:J ^H %tso Bws Y".
0.13 in. WC
24 of 65
pdllhrpe
TTCIINICAL GFiCUP Isokinetic Field Data
Big w$t Oil, LLC - North Salt Lrke, UT[rcation:
Drte:
Start Tire: 15:05
End Tim: 16:15
Source: MSCC
Project No.: 20234280 PM/CPM
STACK DATA (EST)EOUIPMENT STACK DATA (EST)FILTER NO.STACK DATA (trINAL)MOIST. DATA
Moisture: 10.0 7o est.
Baroretric 26.10 in. Hg
Static Presr: 0.07 in. wC
Stack Press: 26.11 in. Hg
CO2: ll.0 oh
Or: L5 Yo
Nr/CO: 815 %
Md: 30.78 lb/lb-mole
Ms: 29.50 lb/lb-mole
Meter Bor ID: M5-9v,Tlf3--an@(io.wq'iEi--
Probe ID: Pr709J
Liner Material; glN
Pitot ID: Pr709-1
rirot cprryp", ilii6-fEffi
noor"m,EIJI6-]-iil
Nozle Do (ln.): 0.380
Est. Tm: 67
Est. Ts: 500
Est. AP: 0.13 in. WC
Est. Dn: 0399 in.
Tarset Rate: 0.75 scftn
16824-C Pb: 26.10 in. Hg
Pg: 0.07 in. WC
O:: l.l %
COz; l7.l %
I Ch..I Pr Inlrl'l
Ylc (ml)
90.2
K.FACTOR
10.60
Flml Corr
"EAK CHf,CKI Pre Mid I Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid I (c0
Mid 2 (c0
Mid 3 (cfi
Le.k Rrte (cfm): 0.001 - 0.00t
Vrcuum (in llg): 15 - 6
Pttot Tub€i Pass - Pass ,ld-Poiot Lerk Check Vol (cf):
a
6L
Sanple Tire
(minut6)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(fc)
Pitot
Tube
AP
(h wc)
Gas TemDeratures fF)Orilice Press.
AH
(in. wC)
Pump
Vac
(i!. HC)
Grs TemDerrtures ("I
% ISO Vs
(fps)
DGM AYerase Strck Probe Filter Imp Exit CPM
Amb.
Besir End Ideal Actual
AI 000 500 I 30 895 0 4 65 496 .49 .50 4 322 321 54 65 101.3 29.93
)5.00 10.00 t34.475 0 3 66 499 I t,t 140 4 124 326 55 65 98.3 28.89
3 10.00 r5.00 137.825 0 4 66 495 .49 .50 4 726 325 5 66 101_6 29.92
4 15.00 20.00 14r.425 0.3 68 498 .38 .40 4 325 326 56 66 ol I 28.87
20.00 25.00 144.88s o.t2 68 499 .28 .30 4 322 326 56 67 00.9 2',1.7 5
6 25 00 i0 00 4A 20()68 499 .28 .30 4 322 324 56 67 0r.0 21.7 5
BI 30.00 35.00 t51.520 68 500 t28 130 4 124 126 51 66 01.8 71 1a
35.00 40.00 154.865 0 3 68 50t 38 40 4 125 121 7 66 00_8 28.92
40.00 45.00 t58.310 0.J 68 500 ,8 .40 4 322 327 58 66 00 28.90
4 45.00 50.00 161.740 0 4 68 499 .49 .50 4 328 58 66 01.3 29.98
50 00 55 00 155 l15 0. l4 61 500 .48 .50 4 325 328 59 65 02.0 29.99
6 55.00 60.00 168.945 0.t2 68 500 .28 .30 4 326 324 60 65 008 2'1.77
Fio.l DGM: 172.255
oF,t
q)
H
RunTlm Vm AP Tm rs H: ^H %rso Bws Y,.
60.0 mn 4r360 ft'0.13 in. WC 67.3 49E.E 4 1,400 io. WC 101.5 0.106 0.2
25 of 65
pul6nrce
TTCIINICAL GHC}LIP Isokinetic Field Data
Big W€st Oll, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
STACK DATA STACK DATA STACK DATA (FINAL)
Meter Box ID: M5-9
AH @ (itr.wc): 1.843
Pitot ID: Pr709-l
Pitot Cp/Typc: 0.840
Nozle Dn (in.): 0.380
Molsture: 10.0 Yo est.
Baromtric: 26.10 in. Hg
Static Press: 0.07 in. wC
Stack Press: 26.1 t in. Hg
CO2: t'1.0 oh
O1t 1.5 Vo
Ny'CO: 815 %
Md: 30.78 lb/lb-mole
Ms: 29-50 lb/lb-mole
Pb: 26.04 in. Hg
Pg: 0.07 in. WC
Or: 1,2 %
co,t---li-or"
Est. Tm: 67
Est. Ts: 499
Est. AP: 0.13 in. WC
Esa. Dn: 0.402 itr.
Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
Mid t (cf)
Mid 2 (cf)
Mid 3 (cf)
I Pre Mid I Mtd 2 Mld 3 Post
Leak R.te (cfm): 0.001 - 0.001
Vrcuum (in Hg): 15 - 7
o
a
a4
Sanplc Tire
(miDutes)
Dry Gas Meter
Rerding
(fc)
Pitot
Tube
AP
(itr sC)
Gas TemDeratwes (oF)Orifice Press.
AH
(io.WC)
Plmp
V.c
(in. Ee)
Grs TemDeratures ('
%ISO Vs
(fps)
DGM AYerase Strck Probe Filaer ImD Erit CPM
Amb.
BesiD End Iderl Acturl
AI 000 500 |t2.5t9 58 497 116 r40 4 \26 ,21 5l 68 101.6 28.86
2 5.00 10.00 176.000 0 4 60 499 47 1.50 4 325 126 5l 68 t 0l.6 29.98
10.00 15.00 179.550 0 5 6t 499 5'l 1.60 4 ,26 52 68 101.9 31.03
4 t5.00 20.00 I 83.240 0.3 62 500 .37 1.40 4 321 325 52 67 101.2 28.90
5 20.00 25.00 186.660 0.2 61 500 .26 1.30 4 ,21 ,2s 53 67 100.5 21.77
6 25 00 30 00 89 930 t3 l 502 t\7 l -40 4 126 326 55 67 100.7 28.93
BI 30.00 35.00 193.335 0 2 63 500 26 1.30 4 129 127 55 66 100.8 z',t.7',|
35.00 40.00 r96.615 0 2 63 501 26 r.30 4 ,28 ,26 56 66 t00 5 27.78
40.00 45.00 199.885 0.3 63 500 .37 1.40 4 128 122 56 66 100.3 28.90
4 45.00 50.00 203.280 0 3 61 499 .3'I r.40 4 325 32t 51 67 100.2 28.89
5 50.00 55.00 206.615 0.498 .58 1.60 4 ,23 12l 57 67 100.6 31.01
6 55.00 60.00 210.335 0 4 63 499 48 r.50 4 t22 323 58 66 101.0 29.98
Firrl DGM: 213.886
Ts Y"t AH o/.Iso Bws Y..
Vec
0.13 in. WC
26 of 65
pull6rrrce
TEGHNICN L GROUP
Emissions Calculations
Location Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt t ake, UT
Source MSCC
Project No.2023-4280
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date
Start Time
Stoo Time
t2tr5t23 r2nst23 t2lt5l23
12:52 15:05 16:40
13:52 16:05 17:40
Calculated Data - Outlet
Cz Concentration, Yo dry co, 1.00 L06 t.21 1.09
COz Concentration, % dry cco. 17.40 17.08 16.95 17.t4
27 of65
Al6rceTECHNIOAL GFIOI.IP
Runl-RMData
Itr dos
Soficc:
frojcct Nc:
D.tG:
North Sslt
Or-Ord.t COz-(Mct
'/.ilry 7.dt!
Ummctcd
CdGrr
Prrt6t
PGtt rt
LtmgcT*rt
PrGted
?ctt6t
Avcn3cCd
Concctcd R[
1.32 t6.7E
10.96 t0.91
0.37 0.37
0.37 0.43
0.37 0.40
10.7t 10..1610.75 10.88
10.77 10.6?
r.06
t.t4
t.l0
1.07
1.08
t.09
1.(r
t.2l
t20
t.2l
126
t.2E
l.3r
t.35
t.!7
1.30
t.34
t.48
t.4t
1.43
l-47
1.48
r-41
t.44
1.40
r.42
1.36
1.32
t.36
1.35
r.37
I-2E
l.l9
l.3t
1.38
1.35
t.3E
t.33
t./rc
1.37
1.44
t.33
1.39
1.39
t.29
1.35
t.42
t.25
l.tt
1.32
t.33
1.28
t.3l
1.32
129
1.33
t.37
1.40
r.39
1.38
t6.79
16.6t
16.57
16.49
16.50
16.5E
16.66
t6.u
16.73
16.84
16.80
16.7t
t6.72
16.62
t6.62
16.64
16.56
16.4E
16.41
16.47
16.4E
t6.44
16.56
16.60
16.@
t6.66
t6.7s
16.E7
t6.E6
t6.t9
t6.87
16.92
17.08
l6.m
16.90
16.90
16.87
t6.92
16.69
16.9t
16.86
16.92
16.88
16.83
16.93
16.87
l6.El
16.95
17.08
t6.v
16.93
16.98
16.9t
16.96
17.00
16.94
16.90
16.E6
I6.EE
t6.tt
12:52
l2:53
12:54
12t55
12:56
12i57
l2:58
12:59
l3:00
l3:01
l!:o2
l3:03
13:04
l3:05
l3:06
l3:07
l3:0t
l3:09
t3:10
l3:l I
13:12
l3:13
l3:14
l3:15
13:16
l3:l 7
l3:lt
l3:19
l3:m
13:21
ll:22
ll:23
13:24
13t25
13t26
13:27
l3:2E
l3:29
l3:30
l3:3 I
ll:32
l3:33
l3:34
l3:35
l3:36
13:?7
l3:36
l3:39
l3:40
l3:41
13:42
l3:43
13:4
13:45
lr:46
13t47
l3:48
l3:49
l3:50
l3:51
28 of65
AIffirce
TEGHN:CAL GFIOI,JP
Run2-RMData
Lo""tior:
Source: MSCC
ProJect No.:
Tim
Unit
Strtus
Or - Outlet CO: - Outlet
"/odry o/"dry
Valid Vatid
Ru Avenge (C"h)
Crl Grs CoDceDtration (CM^)
Pretst System Z€ro Rqponsc
Psttest SysteD Z€ro RespoN€
Average Z€ro Response (Co)
Pretest Systcm Cd Responsc
Posttest Systcm Csl RespoNe
Average Crl Respoos€ (CM)
Corected Run
1.35 t6;76
t0.96 10.91
0.37 0.43
0.31 0.37
0.34 0.40
10.75 10.88
10.78 10.82
10.77 10.85
t_05 17.08
1.39
t.4l
1.36
1.30
1.42
l.3l
1.28
l5:05
l5:06
l5:07
l5:08
15r09
t5: l0
l5:l I
l5:12
l5:1 3
l 5:14
l5:1 5
l5: l6
1,5:17
l5;18
l 5:19
l5:20
l5:21
l5:22
l5:23
15,24
l5:25
15:26
15127
l5:28
15129
l5:30
l5:31
15i32
l5:33
l5:34
l5:35
l5:36
15t37
l5:38
l5:39
l5:40
l5;41
l5:42
l5:41
l5:44
l5:45
l5:46
l5:47
l5:48
l5:49
l5:50
l5:51
l5:52
l5:53
l5:54
I 5:55
l5:56
15157
l5:58
l5:59
l6:00
l6:01
l6:02
l6:03
l6:04
1.47
l.4l
t.29
1.28
l.3l
1.34
l.2s
1.28
1.34
1.33
1.41
l.3 t
l.l0
l.3l
t.23
1.26
t.2t
1.20
t.34
1.32
1.34
1.33
1.28
t.34
t.32
t.23
t.2'7
1.28
l.3l
l.4t
1.45
1.40
1.36
1.39
1.42
1.56
1.60
t.47
1.50
1.50
l.4l
1.30
1.40
r.42
t.24
16.13
16.73
t6.76
16.84
16.'t I
16.74
16.82
t6.76
t6.74
16.87
16.71
16.74
t6.79
t6.76
16.73
16.65
t6.66
16.80
t6.79
16.79
16.79
16.82
16.8 I
16.13
t6.76
16.73
t6.79
t6.79
16.79
16.89
t6.87
16.89
16.89
16.82
16.80
16;t9
16.80
16.81
16.'79
l6_80
16.88
16.81
16.83
16.81
t6.11
t6.6s
t6.71
t6.74
t6.7t
16.68
t6.55
t6.53
t6.64
16.59
16.63
t6.71
16.85
t6.75
t6.73
16.90
35
35
22
37
32
30
l?
l8
29 of 65
AI6rceTECHNI{:AL GNO[JP
Run3-RMData
ftrltiotr: Bis west Oil. LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Source: MSCC
Prcject No.:
Dile: l2ll5l23
Tim
Unlt
St tus
0r - Outlet
'/o dry
CO, - Outlet
o/o ntY
Valid
Uncorrected Rut Averrge (C.h)
Crl Grr Conccnb.tiotr (CM^)
Pret6t System Zero Response
Pctt6t System Zcro RespoGe
Averrge Zero Raspome (Co)
Pretest Syst€m Cal R$poNe
Porttest SystcE Cal R€spoGe
Averege Crl Re+oDse (CM)
Conccted Run
l6:40
16t4l
16142
l6:43
16t44
l6:45
l6:46
l6:47
l6:48
l6:49
l6:50
l6:51
l6:52
l6:53
l6:54
l6:55
l6:56
l6:57
l6:58
16:59
l7:00
l7:01
17102
l7:03
t't:u
17:O5
l7:06
lTio'l
l7:08
17:O9
l'7:10
l7:l I
l7:12
l7:l 3
11:14
l7:1 5
l'ltl6
17:17
l7;18
l7:19
l7:20
17:21
17:22
11:23
17:24
l'l:25
l'l:26
l7:27
17128
17129
l'l:30
l7:31
l'I:32
l7:33
17i34
17:35
l7:36
17t37
l7:38
17139
l_50 16.64
10.96
o,3r
0.38
0.35
10.78
to;72
1o.75
t.44
1.33
1.48
1.45
1.38
1.48
l.5l
1.50
1.47
1.55
1.55
1.63
1.54
1.56
1.45
t.52
1.55
1.47
t.40
t.46
1.40
1.35
1.43
1.38
1.42
1.38
l.s0
1.50
l.4l
1.49
t.M
1.50
l.s3
1.52
l.5l
t.4't
1.52
1.54
1.45
t.4l
l.4l
1.44
1.43
1.43
1.49
1.43
1.41
L45
1.48
1.43
1.46
t.52
3.20
1.43
1.39
t.52
1.46
t.50
1.53
1.56
10.91
0.37
0.43
0.40
10.82
10.89
10.86
16.61
16.79
16.65
16.6'.1
t6.74
16.66
t6.64
16.61
16.61
16.5't
t6.54
16.51
16.55
16.5E
16.68
t6.64
16.58
16.65
16.70
16.65
t6.70
16.76
16.70
16.72
16.65
16.73
16.63
t6.62
16.70
r6-61
16.64
16.63
16.58
16.60
16.65
16.71
16.62
r6.61
t6;tI
t6.7t
t6.75
16.72
t6.76
t6.75
16.68
16.72
t6.77
t6.76
16.70
t6.75
16.73
16.63
t4.94
16.12
16.75
16.70
16.75
15.72
16.68
16.65
30 of65
31 of65
Allionce Technicol Group, LLC
Anolyticol Services
5530 Morsholl St.
Arvodo, CO 80002
(720) 4s7-e504
www.ollioncetg.com
Anolyticol Loborotory Report
Big West Oil. LLC
333 W. Center Street
North Solt Loke, UT 84054
Project No. AST-2023-4280
32 of 65
1 of21
Certificotion Stotemenl
Allionce Source Testing, LLC (AST) hos completed the onolysis os described in this report. Results
opply only to the source(s) tested ond operoting condition(s) for the specific test dote(s) ond
iime(s) identified within this report. All results ore intended to be considered in their entirety.
ond AST is not responsible for use of less thon the complete tesi report withoui written consent.
This report sholl not be reproduced in full or in port without written opprovol from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge ond obilities, oll informotion, focts ond iest doto ore conect.
Doto presented in this report hos been checked for completeness ond is occurote, error-free
ond legible. Any deviotions or problems ore detoiled in the relevont sections on the test report.
This document wos prepored in portoble document formot (.pdf) ond contoins poges os
identified in the bottom footer of this document.
Volidotion Signoture
The onolyticoldoto ond ollQC contoined within this report wos reviewed ond volidoted by the
following individuol.
James Davidson
Jomes Dovidson
Quolity Associote
tlgitally 5ign6d by Jam$ Davidsn
DN: C-US, CN=Jam D.fr $n, E+m.davldsdr@$ackE9.q
R@: I il6d b h6 .@ary ad intogdty of lhis d@um6nt
hton: Fur Bigning Mbn horc
Oab: 2024.01.05 1142:23{A@'
Fod PF Edilor V€rcM: 1 1 27
Dote
33 of65
2of21
Proiect Nonoiive
Anolyticol Method(s):
Method 58 - Determinotion of Nonsulfuric Acid Porticulote Emissions From Stotionory
Sources
Method 202-Dry lmpinger Method for Determining Condensoble Porticulote Motter
Emissions From Stotionory Soufces
Filteroble The filter(s) were either oven dried ond/or desiccoted per the method until o finol
weight wos obtoined. The liquid froctions were extrocted if required, evoporoted ond
cooled until o finol weight wos obtoined. These froctions were summed together to
provide the totol Porticulote Moller collected.
Condensoble The filter(s) were extrocted per the method. The orgonic exiroct wos odded to the
orgonic rinse, ond lhe inorgonic extroct wos odded to the inorgonic rinse. The
inorgonic froction wos extrocted with solvent per the method. Extrocls were combined
with the orgonic rinse. The orgonic ond inorgonic froctions were evoporoted ond
desiccoted until o finol weight wos obtoined.
MDL The Minimum Detection Level (MDL) is 0.5 mg per froction. lf the meosured result for o
froction is less thon lhe MDL, the MDL wos used in ensuing colculotions.
Blonk Conection lf blonk conection is performed, only blonk volues returned higher thon lhe MDL ore
used. lf o blonk returns o volue less lhon lhe MDL, no coneclion is included.
Custody: The somples were received by Cory Monshock on 1212212023 in Arvodo, CO. The
somples were received in good condition with proper Choin-of-Custody
documentotion. No opporent conloiner problems were noted upon receipt. Prior lo
onolysis, the somples were kept secure Wth occess limited to outhorized personnel of
/sT.
Number of Somples: 21
Lobeling: Acceploble
Anolyst: Corson Williomson - Loborotory Anolyst I
Ryon Gillett-Loborotory Anolyst ll
Equipment: Mettler Toledo Bolonce ML-104, SN B217893065. This scole wos used for onolyticol
determinotions of filters ond rinse vessels.
Denver lnstruments Bolonce T9-6201, SN 17904189. This scole wos used to meosure the
totol moss of rinse collected for blonk conection.
Anolysis wos performed on the some bolonce os the ossocioted tore.
Quincy Lob lnc oven, 30CG. SN G3-0.l2673.
Lob Reogents: Acetone Lot Number:224521
Hexone Lot Number: 224540
QC Noles: The somples met the minimum criterio estoblished by the relevont melhod.
A blonk conection wos opplied per the method.
Reporting Notes: none
34 of65
3of21
,J/ta Clty.Sidt€
TECiINICAL GBC]UP Prorect No
Iio West Oil, LLC
{orth Soll toke. UT 84054
\sr,2023-4280
iPA Melhod 5B
Fronl Holl Rlter
lob lD D39i 33 D39138 D39t 43
tleld lI M58/202-MSCC-Run I Cont. I M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Cont. I M5B/202-MSCC-RUn 3 Con1. l
tllter ll 16971 -C 16424 -C 1E938 -C
Filte.lce- (0.5092 0.47 l0 0.5126
Dsle . Over t2t2a t23 ta2at23 1A2At23
Tlme . Over 5..42 S:42 5:12
Dole. Derkcolo t2t2at23 12t28t23 12128123
flme - Detkcolo I l:45 I t-45 ll:n5
Dote ol lteighin(1t2/24 v3t24 1/2t21 | /2t24 | /2t21 v2/24
IIme oI Weighin!l4:01 8:41 7:56 140I 7-56 l4:0!
Flter Welghl, I 0.5071 0.5073 0.4714 0.47! 5 0.5r05 0.5 104
Ff,ler PM Mo$, m'0.5 0.5 0.5
Eonl Hdl lin3€
Lqb lI D39r 34 D39139 D39l 44
Fleld lI M5B/202-MSCC-Run I Cont. 2 M58/202sSCC-Run 2 Conl. 2 M5B/202-MSCC-RUn 3Cont. 2
Beoker l[32624 32s9r 32629
Beker lore, !3.8679 3.9490 3.9033
Bdke. wllh Acelone, I 30.4 307 294
Acalone Mq!s, (265 26.8 25.5
tlole . Over 12128123 )2t28t23 12t28t23
nme . Ovet 5112 5t42 5142
Dole . Deiccolor t2t28t23 \2t28t23 't2128123
Tlme . Deilccolo I r45 l:45 I l:45
Dolc orw.lghlng 112/24 t 12/24 t/2t21 t/2124 I t2/24 1t3t21
nmc olwclghlh!8:00 1t 17 8:00 1 4t17 8.37
lryebhl, i 3.869t 3.8694 3.9506 3.9502 3.9038 3.9040
llEe l{c., mg'r.il ta 0.6
Blonk Cor,ecle(NO
Iololnon-ruitudc Pil M@., mg I.t ll l.l
35 of65
4of21
AJ6fffi,ilj
FAlhrrce civ, s
Pro.lect
lio west Oil, LLC
{orth Soli Loke. uT 84054
ASr-2023-4280
:PA Method 202
Teflon Flllel
Lob lI D39r35 D39 1 40 D39r 45
tleld lI M5B/202-MSCC-RUn I Ctrt. 3 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Cont. 3 M58/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 3
Orgonlc trocllon
Lob It D39137 D39142 D39147
field lI M5B/202-MSCC-RUn I Cont. 5 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Coni. 5 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 5
B€oker lI 32637 32623 326t3
Beoker lqre, (3.9r s30 3.85t 40 3.87355
Beqker SolYent, e 127.7 I 32.1 t30.9
SolYent MGs, (t23.8 128_2 \27.O
Dole - Dealccolo 12t28t23 12128/23 12/28/23
nme - Deslccolo 4:24 4:24 4:24
Dote ot weighin(12129123 | 12124 12t29t23 1/2124 t2129/23 112124
nme ol weighin!8:l 0 8:06 8:10 8;06 8:10 8:06
Weight, !3.9188 3.9189 3.8549 3.855r 3.4774 3.477 5
Orgonic PM Mois, mgr 3.5 3.6 3.9
lnorgonlc Frocllon
Lob lt D39 r35 D39l4l D39146
Fleld lt MSB/202-MSCC-RUn I Cont, 4 M5B/202-MSCC-Run 2 Coni. 4 M58/202-MSCC-Run 3 Cont. 4
Beoker lI 31627 3t 60r 3t617
Beoker lore, (88.2100 45.6204 64.95/-9
Beoker Woier, g 256.6 271.2 241.9
Wdts Mo3s, e I 68.4 r 85.6 176.9
Dole - Dedccolor 12/28t23 12128t23 12128123
Ilme - Deslccolo 5:53 6:53 6:53
Date of Welghin€12t29t23 | 12124 12t29t23 1/2/24 12/29/23 1/2/24
IIme of Welghlne 8:59 7:5O 8:59 7lfi 8:59 7:50
Weight, g 8.2137 88.2r 36 85.625r 85.6250 64.9569 64.9570
lndgonlc Mosi, mg'3.7 4.7 2.1
Slonk Conectec Yes
Iolol PM Mosr, m!5.2 6.3 4.O
rAll frqctions were onolyzed ond returned volues greoter thon the MDL of 0.5 mg.
37 of65
6 ot21
City,Slote
Project No.
]io West Oil. LLC
.lorth Solt Loke. UT 84054
\sT-2023-4280
:PA Method 202
feflon titer Blonks
HeH TEin Blonk Prool Blonk
lob lt D391 5l
tield lt M202-Ft Recovery Blonk Cont 3
Orgonlc Frocllon Blonk
Beld Troin Blonk Proof Blonk
Lob lt D39t 53 D39 I 50
Field ll M202-Ft Recovery Blonk Cont 5 M202-FI Proof Blonk Cont. 5
Beokd ll 32588 32600
Beoker lrore, !3.935,1 3.8127
Eeoker Solvenl, !137.0 170.7
Solvenl Mo3s, !133.1 t66.9
Dole - Desiccolo 12128/23 t2/28t23
Iime - Deslccolq 4:2A I l:45
Dote of Welghlnr 112124 I t3t24 1/2t24 112124
Iima ot Welghin(8:06 l0:30 8:02 I 4:57
Welght, (3.9383 3.9380 3.8r33 3.8129
Orgonic Mo!3, m9'2.O 0.5
lnorgonlc Fioclion Blonks
FieH froin Blonk Prool Blonk
tob lt D39152 D39 t49
field lt M202-FI Recovery Blonk Cont 4 M202-FT Proof Blonk Cont. 4
Beoks lt 31 636 31 635
Beoks lore, (65.2570 89.2969
Beoker Woter (228.7 207.3
Wqlor ft\oss, (163.4 I 18.0
Dqle - De3iccolo t2/28123 t2128/23
Ilme - Dellccolo 6:53 6:53
Dole ol Weighin{t t2t24 | 13t24 112/24 1/2t24
Ilme of Weighln(7:50 8;34 8:06 14:57
WelgM, {55-2569 65.2573 89.n70 89.2973
lnorgonlc Moss, mg'0.0 0.5
38 of65
7 of21
\o
o
o\
!!o
!o
o
!o
ouexDH/auola)v - aSuru lua^lo(!
<)
J
v)
a)
qt4o
Y
{
Ma6
(",1
(-0
n-ltl I$cl 'ldg ri
*c -l
oo,ol
60d
oz
llllc - l{)lPf alesuapuo I
uoua L uur[8 - ]a]t!t ],ld_
oo
ouolalv - asur8 S'Z 5 l^l(
auotorv - asur[ 0L=nd > E ;
auola)v - asuru 0[ < y\(
/UenO uJlx/t/ Jd(lLljnN Jdlll
auolelv asrJru olzzoN aqor(
raqu,nN Ia8 lellt.
a[olo)v asuru alzzof
poc
zueno uJtlr /F raqurnN rotll.
I
9
auolJ)v dsuru alzzoN aqor(
zllPnO ururt'8 - JaqurnN]au
\)
F€J
I:t
$
\
UNoJ
clol
a-,\I
€
\\zt
\
?
N,It2 \\Jr)Nt
U
q o';
l=3
\n
GJt $
c
$\f
u
{-f
,t
-f
=
o
I
U ri Ct q q.
uP!c
rozv
c,(i
U
:
r!
(:,)
e
cl!
Co
g
:
cs
oI
F
o
cts
a'
o
d
ts
oo
(:c
cc
a:i 6
o
,q
t
otjz
I
ts
EI
T
P
oc
E
oti-o
I
E)F
N
ozti
a
.Ra6
.9
Jd
Ee4'rsh
.i1 c -{
.€D
.9i60
-o^o;
(^5
fi,UH
"lrOo
C5'(o$
-c>U
I
ri0
=(
v
o
-{
ftil
HI:l
5l
g
;
3
qt
E
z
q
Callbraton Cerdficats ]D
NAI 548-038-030823-ACC-U SL
MettlerToledo, LLC
1900 Polaris Parkway
Columbus, OH43240
1.8OO.METTLER
Customer
METTTER TOTEDO
Accredited by the American Association
for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA)
CALIBRATION CERT #1 788.01
ISO 17025 Accredited
ANSUNCSL 2540-1 Accredited
Accuracy Galibration Certificate
Alliance Source Testinq
5530 Marshall St
Company
Addrcss:
Clt1l:
Zp / Pctal:
Stale/ Prwinca:
Weighing Device
Arvada Contact:Eric Grosiean
80002-3108
Colorado
Manufadir€n
Modd:
Serial No.:
Buildlrg:
Floor
Room:
Mettler Toledo
MLl04/03
821 7893065
5520
Lab
,|120 g 0.0001 g
lnstument Type:
Asset Number:
Terminal Model:
Terminal Serial No.:
Teminal Asset l,lo.:
Weighing lnstrument
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Procedure
Callbnation Guldellne:
METTLER TOLEDO Work lnrhrcdon:
ASTM E898.20
30260953 v1.61
This calibration certificate including procedures and unceflainty estimation also complies with EURAMET cg-18 v 4.0.
This calibration cerlificate contains measurements for As Found and As Left calibrations.
The sensitivity/span of the weighing instrument was adjusted before As Left calibration with a built-in weight.
In accordance with EUMMET cg-18 (1112015), the test loads were selected to reflect the specific use of the weighing device or to
accommodate specifi c calibration conditions.
As Found Start: 21.1 'C End: 20.9 'C Start:21.0 % End:21.0%
As Lefl Start:20.8'C End:20.7'C Start:21.0 % End:20.0 %
Environmental conditions have been
verified to ensure the accuracy of the
calibration.
This certificate is issued in accordance with the conditions of accreditation granted by MLA, which is based on ISO/IEC 17025. AZLA
has assessed the measurement capability of the laboratory and its traceability to recognized national standards.
As Found Celibratlon Dab:
As L.eft Calibraffon DatE:
lssue Dats:
Requesbd No<t Calibnaflon Dab:
08-Mar-2023 Authol?ed A2tA Sbnatorf z,Zrc=-'_\08-Mar-2023
08-Mar-2023 Chris Carson
31-Mab2024
Software VeEion: 1.23.1.70
Report Ve6ion: 2.16.32
Fom Number: AF1702Lrl.0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not be partially reproduced without the
writlen permission of Ele issuing €libralion laboratory.
Page 1 of 5
9ot21
40 of 65
Calibration Certificato lD
NA1 548-038-030823-ACC-U SL MffnER TOLEDO Service
Measurement Results
Repeatability
TestLoad: lfi)g
1 00.0003 g 100.0001 g
2 1 00.0002 g 100.0000 g
3 1 00.0002 g 100.0000 g
4 100.0002 g 100.0000 g
5 100.0001 g 100.0001 g
6 100.0002 g 100.0000 g
7 100.0002 g 99.9999 g
8 100.0000 g 100.0001 g
I 100.0003 g 100.0001 g
10 100.0002 g 't00.0002 g
0 As Found
O es Left
"', 2
Standard 0.qX[99 | 0.C0008gDovletbn
Eccenticfi
6
Tho "d" in the graph rspr6s6nts the readability of the range/intsrual in which the
test was performed,
The results of this graph are based upon the absolute values of the differences
from the mean value.
Tost l-oad:50 g
Maxlmum;il;; | 0.0001e | 0.0000s
The "d" in the graph represents the readability of the range/interval in which
the test was performed.
As Found As bft
Softwaro V66ion: 'l -23.1 70
Report Ve6ion: 2.16.32
Fom Number: AFI 702Lr1-0
@ METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not be partially reproduced wilhout ths
written pemission of th6 issuing €libration laboratory.
Page 2 of 5
1O of 21
4l of65
Calibraton CerUficab lD
NA'1 548{38-030823-ACC-USL METTLER TOTEDO Service
Enorof lndication
As Found
1 N/A 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.,l8 mg 2
2 N/A 20.0000 g 20.0002 g 0.0002 g 0.22m9 2
3 20g 20.0000 g 20.0002 g 0.0002 g 0.22m9 2
4 40g 20.0000 s 20.000 s 0.0001 g 0.22m9 2
5 6og 20.0000 g 20.0001 g 0.0001 g 0.22 mg 2
6 80g 20.0000 g 20.0001 g 0.0001 g 0.22m9 2
7 N/A 60.0000 g 60.000 s 0.0001 s 0.35 mg 2
8 N/A 100.0000 g 100.0003 g 0.0003 g 0.49 mg 2
I NiA 1 19.9999 g 120.0002 s 0.0003 s 0.59 mg 2
As L6ft
1 N/A 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.18 mg 2
2 NiA 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.20 mg 2
3 20s 20.0000 s 20.0000 g 0.0000 s 0.20 mg 2
4 4og 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.20 mg 2
5 6og 20.0000 g 2O.0000 g 0.0000 g 0.20 mg 2
o 80g 20.0000 s 20.0000 g 0.0000 s 0.20 mg 2
7 N/A 60.0000 g 60.0000 g 0.0000 g O.24 mg 2
8 N/A 100.0000 g 100.0001 g 0.0001 g 0.27 mg 2
I N/A 1 19.9999 s 120.0001 g 0.0002 g 0.32 mg 2
* A.;;;
a Asl.efr
For improved legibility of the graphics
only increasing measurement points
are shown and measurement points
close to zero are not displayed.
I
o 5 r------ -
i
i
Calibration Points lgl
The uncertainty stated is the expanded uncertainty at calibration obtained by multiplying the standard combined uncertainty by the
coverage factor k - which can be larger than 2 according to ASTM E898 and EURAMET cg-18. The value of the measurand lies within the
assigned range of values with a probability of approximately 95%.
The user is responsible for maintaining environmental conditions and the settings of the weighing instrumenl when it was calibrated.
6
€
E
.o
@
.9Eg
o
o
lt
"J
I
I
oJ
I
I
120
Software VeEion: 1 23.1.70
Reporl Vffiion: 2.16.32
Fom Number AF1702Lrl.0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original docum€il and may not be partially reproduced without the
written permission of the issuing €libration laboratory.
Page 3 of 5
11 of21
42 of 65
Callbration Certificab lD
NA'l 548{38-030823-ACC-USL METTIER TOLEDO SeTViCe
Test Equipment
All weights used for metrological testing are haceable to national or international standards. The weights were calibrated and certified by
an accredited calibration laboratory.
WeightSet 1: OIML E2
Weight Set No.:
Certificate Number:
Remarks
421 Date of lssue:
Calibration Due Date:
07-Dec-2022
220635345-1 31-Dec-2O23
Value of the built-in weight adjusted
Performed a linearity adjustment
End of Acsedibd Seclion
The information below and any attachments to this calibration certificate are not part of the accredited calibration.
Software Version: 1.23.1.70
Report Ve6ion: 2.16.32
Fom Number AF1702111.0
@ METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not b€ partially reprodu@d wilhoul the
writlen pemission of the i$uing @libration laboratory.
Page 4 of 5
12 of 21
43 of65
Calibraffon Gertficato lD
NA1 548-038-030823-ACC-U SL MEITUR TOTEDO Service
Measurement Uncertainty of the Weighing lnsturnent in Use
Stated is the expanded uncertainty with k=2 in use. The fortnula shall be used for the estimation of the uncertainty under consideration of
the errors of indication. The value R represents the nel load indication in the unit of measure of ihe device.
Temperalure coefficient for the evaluation of the measurement uncertainty in use:
Temperature range on site for the evaluation of the measuremenl uncertainty in use:
Llneartsatbn of UncortalnU Equaflon
2.0.10-6/K
To optimize the stability of the linearization, besides of the zero load only increasing measurement points with a test load of 5% of the
measurement range or larger are taken for the calculation cf the linear equation.
Absolub and Rehtivo Measuroment Uncertrinty in Use brVarlous Net lndloations (Examples)
4K
;e
Gt
g,
.>g
d
3
fo
a
rlC
8C
6l
;-a
?.
50 75
weighine R3ngr [%l
As Found
00001 0001
As Lon
0.0120 g
Sofrware V€Eion: 1.23.1.70
Reporl Ve6ion: 2.16.32
Form Number: AF1702Lr1.0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not b€ partially reprodu@d without the
writien psmisslon ot the issuing €libration laboratory.
Page 5 of 5
13 of 21
44 of 65
Attadrment to Callbratlon Cedfrcab:
NA1 548438-030823-ACC-USL
Manufacturer Tolerance Assessment
METTTER TOTEDO Service
Man ufactu rer Toleran@ Assessment
Assessment done without considering measurement uncertainty.
The measurements from the attached calibration certificate were assessed against METTLER TOLEDO tolerances defined in SOP "l'est and
Measurement Procedures for METTLER TOLEDO balances, Document: 10000018502.
A.s Leftn
./
{
{
./
Measurement Results
Repeatability
As Found
,/
{
{
n
N/A
Overall
Repeatability
Eccentricity
Linearity
Sensitivity
TestLoad:lfi)g
1 1 00.0003 s 00.0001 s
2 100.0002 g 00.0000 g
3 100.0002 g 00.0000 g
4 100.0002 g 00.0000 s
5 100.0001 g 00.0001 g
6 1 00.0002 g 00.0000 g
7 100.0002 g 99.9999 g
8 '100.0000 g '100.0001 g
I 100.0003 g 100.0001 g
't0 100.0002 g 100.0002 s
Standad
Dordatbn 0.00ms 0 0.flX)08 O
Toleranc€0.000109 {0.m0t0g {
Software Vereion: 123.1 .70
Report Version: 2.16.32
Fom Number AFI 702Lr1.0
@ METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not be partially reprodu@d without tho
written pemission of the issuing @libration laboratory.
Page 1 of 2
14 of 21
45 of65
Athcimont b Callbratlon Certfi ceb:
NAI 548-038430823-ACC-USL
Manufacturer Tolerance Assessment
METTTER TOTEDO Service
Eccentricity
Test toad: 50 g
iladmum
Devldon 0.0001 g 0.000 g
Tolorance 0.fiD30s I o.m080s !
The maximum deviation is determined as the absolute value of the largest deviation from the center.
Linearity - Difrerential Msthod
As Found
z N/A 20.0000 g 20.0002 g 0.00006 s
3 2os 20.0000 g 20.0002 g 0.00012 g
4 4og 20.0000 g 20.0001 g 0.0O008 g
5 6og 20.0000 g 20.0001 g 0.00004 g
6 8os 20.0000 s 20.0001 g 0.00000 g
8 N/A 1 00.0000 g 100.0003 g N/A
The As Found Sensitivity Tolerance is only valid if the device has been adjusted before the tesl
AsLd
-inoarity Dcviation 0.0fiX2 g
-lnearlty Tolerance 0.0002s {
-lnoadtv Dovhflon 0.00000 o
-ln6adty Toloranc6 0.ilt02g {
The values in column "Deviation" and the "Linearity Devia$on"
* This point was used to satisry the sensitivily requirement.
iensitivity Doviation 0.0003 s
lensitlvllv Toleranco N/A
iensltlvlty Devlatlon 0.{D0l g
lensltivity Tolorance 0.o(x)8 g {
are zero point offset and sensitivity error compensated,
2 N/A 20.0000 s 20.0000 g 0.00000 g
3 2os 20.0000 s 20.0000 g 0.00000 g
4 4og 20.0000 g 20.0000 s 0.00000 g
5 6og 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.00000 g
6 8os 20.0000 g 20.0000 g 0.00000 g
N/A 100.0000 g 100.0001 s N/A
Software Ve6ion: '123.'l .70
Report V€rsion: 2,16.32
Fom Numben AF1702111,0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original documeri and may not be partially reproduced without th€
written permissim of the issuing €libraiion laboratdy.
Page 2 ol 2
15 ot 21
46 of 65
Callbmtion Ceilificats lD
NA1 548-039{30823-ACC-U SL
M€[flerToledo, LLC
1900 Polaris Parkway
Columbus, OH 43240
1.8OO.METTLER
Customer
trEe'iE'iit6l
METTTER TOLEDO
Accredited by the American Association
for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA)
CALIBRATION CERT #1788.01
ISO 17025 Accredited
ANSYNCSL 2540-1 Accredited
Accu racy Galibration Gertificate
Alliance Source Testing
5530 Marshall St
Company
Addmss:
Clt),:
Zp / Postal:
S:iaia / Prwlnca:
Weighing Device
Arvada Conteci:Eric Grosiean
80002-3108
Colorado
TB-6201
1 79041 89
5520
Lab
1 6200 g 0.1 g
Procedure
ilhnufrctrer
Model:
Serial No.:
Buildlrp:
Floor
Room:
Denver lnsEument Type:
Asset NumboE
Teminal Model:
Termlnal Serbl No.:
TemlnalAsset l,lo.:
Weiqhino lnstrument
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Callbration GuHeline:
METILER TOLEDO Work lnsfrtrcfl on:
ASTM E898 - 20
30260953 v1.61
This calibration certificate including procedures and uncertainty estimation also complies with EURAMET cA18 v 4.0.
This calibration certificate contains measurements for As Found and As Left calibrations.
The sensitivity/span of the weighing instrument was adjusted before As Left calibration with a built-in weight.
ln accordance with EUMMET cg-18 (1112015), the test loads were selected to reflect the specific use of the weighing device or to
accommodate specific calibration conditions.
As Found Start: 20.8'C End: 20.5 "C Start: 20.0 % End:21.O o/"
As Left Start: 20.1 'C End:20.'l 'C Start: 20.9 % End:.21.0 o/o
This certificate is issued in accordance with the conditions of accreditation granted by MLA, which is based on ISO/IEC 17025. A2IA
has assessed the measurement capability of the laboratory and its traceability to recognized national standards.
Environmental conditions have been
verified to ensure the accuracy of the
calibration.
As Found Calibratlon Dab:
As l-eft Callbralion Dato:
lssue Hs:
08-Mar-2023
08-Mar-2023
O8-Mar-2023
R€quesbd Nexl Callbraton Dab: 31-Mat-2O24
Autroltssd A2l.A Signabry d?za----\
Chris Carson
Sofrware Ve6ion: 1.23.1.70
Report Vffiim: 2.'l 6.32
Fom Number: AF1702111.0
@ METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not be partially reproduced without the
written pemission of tle issuing €libration laboratory.
Page 1 of4
16 of 21
47 of65
Calibraton Cerdfrcato lD
NA1 548439430823-ACC-U SL METTLER TOTEDO SerVice
Measurement Results
Repeatability
Test [oad: 2flD g
0 As FoundI as Left
Standard o.ms I o.(x)s
Derriation
4
The 'd" in the graph rsprsssnts th€ readability of the range/inlsrual in which the
test was perfomed.
The results of this graph are based upon the absolute values of the differences
from the mean value.
Eccentricity
Teet l-od:2000 g
i/h)dmumir"rr;#; I o'rs I o'1s
The "d" in the graph represents the readability of the range/interval in which
the tsst was performed.
Enorof lndlcation
As Found As L'oft
As Found
1 o.o g o.o g o.o g 0.06 g 2
2 1000.0 s 999.9 g -0.1 g 0.09 g 2
3 3000.0 s 2999.9 g -0.1 g 0.12 g I
4 4000.0 g 3999.8 g -0.2g 0.14 g 2
5 6000.0 g 5999.8 g -0.2 g 0.19 g 2
48 of65
Sofrware VoEion: 1.23.1.70
Repod VeBion: 2.16.32
Form Number: AF'1702Lr1.0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not be pa.tially reprodu@d withoul the
writlen pemission ot the issuing €libration laboratory.
Page 2 of 4
17 of 21
Callbra0on Certiflcate ID
NA1 548-039-030823-ACC-U SL MffTLER TOLEDO Service
As LEft
1 o.o s o.o s o.o g 0.06 g 2
2 1000.0 g 1000.0 g o.o g 0.09 g 2
3 3000.0 g 3000.0 g o.o s O.12 g 2
4 4000.0 s 4000.0 g o.o g 0.14 g 2
5 6000.0 g 6000.1 g 0.1 s 0.19 s 2
06 3 ffi;;JI
i
i
04-i
:
i
-^^!I uta
c:o.
o:-9,E O;g-:lol
ol
fi -0 2-i
!
!
I
-0.4 +
I
!
I
I
O asun
For improved legibility of the graphics
only increasing measurement points
are shown and measurement points
close to zero are not displayed.
1 000 3000 4000
Calibretlon Polnts [gl
The uncertainty stated is the expanded uncertainty at calibration obtained by multiplying the standard combined uncertainty by the
coverage factor k - which can be larger than 2 according to ASTM E898 and EURAMET cg-18. The value of the measurand lies within the
assigned range of values with a probability of approximately g5%.
The user is responsible for maintaining environmental conditions and the settings of the weighing instrument when it was calibrated.
Test Equipment
All weights used for metrological testing are traceable to national or international standards. The weights were calibrated and certified by
an accredited calibration laboratory.
,06
We[ht Set 1: OIML Fl
Weight Set No.:
Certificate Number:
Remarks
685 Date of lssue:
Calibration Due Date:
12-Jan-2023
2206/2893-1 31-Jan-2025
N/A
End of Accrodibd Sedion
The information below and any attachments to this calibration certiflcate are not part of the accredited calibration.
Software VeBion: 1.23.1.70
Reporl VeEion: 2.1 6.32
Fom Number: AF1702Lr1.0
@ METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not be partially reproduced without the
written permission of the i$uing €libration laboratory.
Page 3 of 4
'18 of 21
49 of 65
Calibration Corfificata lD
NAl s48{39{30823-ACC-USL METTTER TOTEDO Service
Measurement Unoertaintyof theWeighing lnstrumilt in Use
Stated is the expanded uncertainty with k=2 in use. The formula shall be used for the estimation of the uncertainty under consideration of
the errors of indication. The value R represents the net load indication in the unit of measure of the device,
Temperature coefflcient for the evaluation of the measurement uncertainty in use:
Temperature range on site for the evaluation of the measurement uncertainty in use:
LlneartsaUon of UncerhlnV Equaffon
6.0.10-6/K
To optimize the stability of the linearization, besides of the zero load only increasing measurement points with a test load of 5% of the
measurement range or larger are taken for the calculation of the linear equation.
Absoluta and Relatine MeaflJmmont Unoertalnty ln Use brvalous Net lndications (Examples)
6K
;e '-;
E ilE
cf .-
6
/2a
Eo
tr
5
6
50 75
Woighlng Rangc [%l
As Found
01
Askn
Reading [g]
Sofrware Vecion: 1.23.1.70
Report VeEion: 2.1 6.32
Fom Number AF1702Lr1.0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original document and may not be partially reproduced without the
writlen permissi@ of the i$uing €libration laboratory.
Page 4 of 4
19 of 21
50 of65
Attaciment to Callbrafl on Certfi cab:
NA1 s48{39{30823-ACC-USL
Custom Tolerance Assessment
METTTER TOLEDO Service
Custom Tolerance Assessment
Assessment done without considering measurement uncertainty.
One or more of the measurements from the attached calibration certificate were assessed against customer-defined tolerances.
Overall
Repeatability
Eccentricity
Error of lndication
Measurement Resulb
Repeatabllity
As Found
{
{
{
{
As Left
{
I
I
./
Test Load:2m0 g
Standard
o6\rldon o.ms 0.00 g
To16lance 0.10 g ,/0.109 I
Eccenticity
Teet Load:20ff g
Madmum
De\rladon
0.1 g o.l g
Tolelance 0.3 g ,l 0.3 g
Software Version: 1 23.'1.70
Report Version: 2.1 6.32
Fom Number: AF1702lrl.0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original docum€nt and may not be partially reproduced without the
writlen permission of th€ issuing €libration laboratory.
Page 'l of 2
20 of 21
5l of65
Attadrment b Callbratlon Cerufcato:
NA1 548439{30823-ACC-USL
Custom Tolerance Assessment
METTLER TOTEDO Service
Enor of lndication
As Found
As L6ft
Software Vercion: 1 23.'t.70
Report Version: 2.1 6.32
Fom Number AF1702Lr1.0
O METTLER TOLEDO
This is an original documer* and may not be partially reproduced without the
written permission of the i$uing @libration laboratory.
Page2ot 2
21 of 21
52 of 65
53 of65
At6rceTECHNICAL GFO
QA Data
UP
Locetion!!g!!95
Source MSCC
Prolectno.76EZE
- North Salt
Parameter O, - Outlet (lO" - (lnlle-f
Make
Model
S/N
Onereiins Rrnse
Servomex
1400
r4204
25
Servomex
tu0
t4t5c-2
25
Cylinder D
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
cc737000
cc721597
NA
NA
cc737000
cc721597
Cylinder Certifed Values
7*ro
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
10.96
24
NA
NA
10.91
23.7
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zso
Low
Mid
Hlsh
NA
NA
9n3/31
8n6t28
NA
NA
9n3t3t
8tr6t28
Iype of Sample Line Heated Samp Line
of65
alI6rrce
TECHNICAL CROUP Calibration Data
Location: Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
Source: MSCC
Project No.: 20234280
Date: l2ll5123
Parameter O, -Outlet COz - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration 5.00 17.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Snan
5.00
2s.00
24.00
17.00
85.00
23.70
Low Range Gas
Low
High
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.60
14.40
9.48
14.22
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.96
24.00
0.00
NA
10.91
23.70
Response Time (seconds)30.00 30.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cnr")Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.13
NA
10.95
23.96
0.09
NA
10.84
23.60
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.54
NA
0.04
0.17
0.38
NA
0.30
0.42
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
55 of 65
pllrffiircB
TECHNICAL GH(:UP
BiaslDrift Determinations
Location: Bie West Oil. LLC - North Salt Lake. UT
Source: MSCC
Project No.: 2023-4280
Parameter Or - Outlet COz - Outlel
Run 1 Date l2ll5l23
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.00
0.13
10.95
0.31
0.37
10.78
10.75
23.70
0.09
10.84
0.37
0.43
t0.46
10.88
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posftest Soan
1.00
1.00
-0.71
-0.83
1.18
t.43
-1.60
0.17
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.12
0.2s
1.77
Run 2 Date l2ll5l23
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.00
0.l3
10.95
0.37
0.31
10.75
10.78
23.70
0.09
10.84
0.43
0.37
10.88
10.82
Bias (%)
?retest Zero
?osftest Zero
lretest Span
)osttest Snan
1.00
0.75
-0.83
-0.71
t.43
l.l8
0.t7
-0.08
)rift (%)
Lero
vfid
-0.25
0.t2
-0.25
-0.25
Run 3 Date l2ll5D3
ipan Value
:nstrument Zero Cal Response
:nstrument Upscale Cal Response
lretest System Zero Response
?osttest System Zero Response
lretest System Upscale Response
losttest System Upscale Response
24.00
0. t3
10.95
0.31
0.38
10.78
r0.72
23.70
0.09
10.84
0.37
0.43
10.82
10.89
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
0.75
t.04
-0.71
-0.96
l.l8
1.43
-0.08
0.21
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.29
-0.25
0.25
0.30
56 of65
PJIJTquh{ondl&g
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 7'l'107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12020
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
)ct2't59t
2790t
9OO PSIG
JC t21591.2020I.J41IJ4
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
tBt18t2020
)8t16t2028
- shreveoon - LA
)c721597 .20200810
)98499520
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA{00/R-121531,
procedure G1.
SMART.CERT
Goncentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
*0.18 Yo
r0.12Yo
Reference Standard(s)
E80041474.20180504
E80089906.20190405
EB0097897.20171 01 I
071001
2659a
c1 30941 0.01
1 162980025 08t0312020
I 162980025 07t23t2020
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verifled to meet the deflned specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnlernational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall nol be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Seruices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
/ \ ,,.1Y* D"al"?
Jasmine Godfr€y
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
57 of65
/#
-,-#*il**
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-5s1 -81 s0
PGVP Vendor lO # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
ic737000
t253t',l
IgUU PSIG
)c737000.202308224
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifi cation Dates:
)9t15t2U23
)911312031
- Shreveport - LA
4c73700020230822
10389'1048
calibration standard has been certified per the May -12t531,
G1.
SMART.CERT
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
10.91%
10.96 %
cc737012
E80004315
cc737012 2023022A
E8000431 5.20201022
Analytical lnstrumentation
co2
02
FTIR MKS
Thermo
MKS 2O3,1DJG2EKVS1 3T o1714U67 08129t2023
1 162980025 09/14t2023410i
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable thrcugh National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall nol be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas SeNices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Ghemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 20'1849-17
58 of 65
lllt6r1EeTECHNICAL AROUP
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Bis West Oil, LLC - North Salt Lake, UT
2023-4280
Drte: 12/1512023
Traverse Point Time o2
(o/n\
Coz
(Vol
A-l
2
J
I l:39
1l:40
I l:41
t.t4
1.10
l.l5
l.l
16.47
16.5s
16.54
16.5Averase
Criteria Met Sinsle Point Sinsle Point
59 of65
nll6re
TECHNIOAL CROUP
Response Times
Locatlon: Bis West Oil. LLC -North Salt
Source:
ProfectNo.: 20234280
Zeto
Low
Mtd
put6urce
TECHN]CAL GROUP
Locrtlon Big West Oil, LLC - North Salt L.ke, UT
QA/QC Data
Source MSCC
Project No. 20234280
Parameter PM/CPM
Date Nozzle ID
Nozzle lriameter (in.)
#l #2 #3 l)tr (AYerase) Difference Criterle Materirl
t2/15/23 GL-380 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.380 0 000 < 0.004 in.glass
Date Pitot ID Evidence of
drmape?
Uvidence OI
mis-allgnment?
C.librrtion or
Penolr ranillrad,
12il5t23 Pr709-l no no no
Drte Probe or Reference IDdicated Difference Criteria Probe Length
t2/ts/23 Pr709-l 250.0 250.0 0.0%+ 1.5 % (absolute)9',
Field Balance Check
Date 12fi5t23
Balatrce ID MLO58 SCAI,N
Certified Weight ID:slc-r KG-r
Certified Weight (g):t000.0
Measued Weight (g):999.9
Weight Difference (g):0_t
Date Pressure
llvidence of
dameoe?Reading Verified ualrDrauotr or Weather Station Locrtion
t2/15/23 Weather Station NA NA NA Salt Lake City, UT
I)rt€Mcter Box lD Positive Pressure Leak Check
12115/23 M5-9 Pass
Reagent Lotil lield Prep
oerfomed Field Lot Daie By
ACETONE 216543 No
HEXANE 2rlo34 No
DI WATER 231106 No
Postt6t Purse
Run I Run 2 Run 3
Flow Ratc (lom): 14 Flow Rate (lom): l4 Flow Rate alnm):
Clock Time Tc Clock Time Temnemrrre Cl6.k Time TemneDhtre
14:20
l4;35
l4:50
l5:05
I 5:20
70.0
70.0
71.0
7L.O
7l 0
6:30
6145
'7:00
7tl5
7:30
o6
68,0
69.0
69.0
70.0
t7:55
l 8:10
I 8:25
l8:40
l8:55
71.0
71.0
'7 t.0
70.0
10.0
6l of65
DGM Calibration-Orifices
Document lt 620 004
Revisior 230
Effective Dat(1/25/23
lssuinq Department Ie.h Setui.es Pag(lofl
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console lD: M5-9
t\.4eter S/N: 20035541
Critical Orifice S/N: 1330
Calibration Detail
n,tial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
:inal Barometric Pressure, rn. Hg (Pb,
\veraqe Barometric Pressure, in. Hq (Pb)
25.84
25 81
25.83
Critifcal Orifice lD (Y)
K' Factor, ft3.R'/2 / in. wc min (K')
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (V,
lnitial DGM Volume, ftr (vm )
Final DGM Volume, ft3 (Vmr)
Iotal DGM Volume, ftr Um)
1330-31
0.8429
13.0
60.233
71.254
11.021
1330-3 1 1330-25
0.6728
150
90.179
98 9ss
8.776
1330-25 1330-19
0.5186
16.0
121.102
128.055
6 953
'1330r9
0.8429 0 613 0.519
130
72.479
83 508
11.029
150
1'11 485
120.285
8.800
160
128.055
134.893
6.838
\mbient Temperature, 'F (Ta)
nitial DGM Temperature, 'F 0mJ
:inal DGM Temperature,'F (TmF)
\veraqe DGM Temperature,'F ( Tm)
71
68
68
68
t1
6B
69
69
72
70
71
71
72
71
71
71
73
71
72
72
71
72
73
73
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, fti (Vmstd)
Standard Critical orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr)
lveter Correction Factor (Y)
Toler ance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Tole'arce
Orifice Cal Check
10 00
3.40
9 6065
9.M92
0 984
0 002
1 867
0.025
10 00
3.40
9.6044
9.4492
0 984
0 001
1 865
0.023
10 00
2.10
7.5857
7.5352
0 993
0 008
1.798
0.044
10 00
2.10
7.5992
7.5352
0.992
0.006
1.797
0 046
10.00
1.30
s 98s0
5.8028
0.970
0.016
1 869
0.027
10.00
130
5 8750
5.8137
0 990
0.004
1 859
0 016
0.88 1.32 1.30
vleter Correction Factor m 0.98s
frifice Calibration Value ( H @)1.U3
)ositive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Eouipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make: OMEGA
Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A
Reference Calibrator S/N. T-197207
Calibration Detail
Reterence Temp Displav Temp Accuracy Difference
i oR oF oR o/o I
0
68
100
460
528
560
2
68
100
462
s28
560
-0.4
00
0.0
2
0
0
223
248
273
683
708
733
225
250
275
68s
710
735
-0.3
-03
-0.3
2
2
2
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1,660
302
401
s00
601
703
803
903
1,004
1,103
1,203
762
861
960
1,061
1,163
1,263
1,363
1,4U
1,563
1,663
-03
-0.1
00
-0.1
-0.3
-02
-03
-0.2
-02
2
1
0
1
3
3
3
4
3
3
Personnel
Stacey Cunninqham
62 of 65
Calibration By:
Calibration Date:
Reviewed By.
RYAN LYONS
10/30/2023
63 of65
'jxoo*ExoctoY
+
No*
+
NoUI
+
N\o(,
--6.E6(,a9
.EFsE8$t*g?EEEE6.
FEE'E+9IFF.AXE4IU*;;Fa:9BtA,60dof,toooEr[[il!ado?zYrU)ZG
coEE
c
a,
E
=
E
o
=6
!o3
o
=aioc
-g
JoG
os
G
!
.8
o
=oiucg
-i.,E
E
Ug
o3
a4x3o
E,.lt
G.c
Eg
ioa^
o.!!sECASSEHHclrtov
o
5ci
E>.85E<or:EO
6
Eo9HEABCE':
Ji o .. uSEEEs(!coTEE{o906sE=96r: a.:
-=(JE1EU\ri!^oHE:;
EOO.=€ UE {EOilrlll€HH E E?ono€EP8arioo-9*o:;iEEEETE
'idE€8._sg;,oEc;.tDoEEE:EEEOlE>trS;!l-nllfeL6OUdcrd*
:
oG
3E.F
=vot
Eg
=8E6
aa2
65 of65
I
1
I
i
ll
I
Att{chment 2
All Acid Gas Flaring Incidents, Tail Gas Incidents anQ Hydrocarbon Flaring Incidents that BWO was required to
prepere under 162.b, 64, 68 and 70 duing the previotir s*-month peiod are included in this Semi-Annual Repon.
:
The following information is included in this attachm*rt:
o Acid Gas/Tail Gas Flarine Incidsnts i
o Not uppli*bl" fo, *o*t r"portin{ neriod.
o Not applicable for current r€portin{l period.
u.s. v. Big west ol LLc, ce l:13{v{n12l-Bc1vs
C@t MS@i-Amud ProgEs Report
July l, 2o23Jrbrcug[ DErmbd 31, 2023
Attachment3
Attachments Related to BWON Reportins of Part V (Affirmative Relief/Xnvironmental Proiects)
Attachments related BWON sampling and laboratory audits.
The following information is included in this attachment:
o BWON Ouarterly EOL Sampling Data and EOL Determination - fl84.a.(3)
o 3'd Quarter 2023
o 4'h Quarter 2023
r BWON Periodic Sampling<l0MG - fl84.a.(2)
o BWON annual POG sampling results, non-EOL sampling pursuant to fl80.b
o BWON Laboratorv Audit Reports - tl86.a. & 186.b.o Not applicable for current reporting period.
U.S. v. Big Wd Oil LLC, Ce l:13{v{Ol2l-BCWS
CoBent Dffie Sefri-Aonual Progresr Report
July l, 2023, through Drcember 31. 2023
@
eE
EEg
.;gd
q
iP^
EHg I
ss=
o
o-
o)5;Nri
=?o:
q
r N
r?i
Oo:'a!
oo
@.
.iot
c6:EE;gsE
6!o6
-i6EoE acGct:;
EEEo=oI
u)
co€ i6EE;! o!EO<
I
?.96c
SE
cc
ocoa
a:
cco=E!
"g ,.
sauc
q:
u
d
I
C
6l s
l.\
;I E
dl g
l"lE
st8-t I
lo'
tc
I
eI
d
.sl>l :
-1:l
EI
rl S
9l
rl q
vl 8
rRl
ti
=l 8-l o-
li
I
RI :
\t e
:l I rs
n'l a
'd
pr d
it -9
Qt ..E
OJ Y
dl I
xbor Ej3 axl - r
3sa
IIEE
ll=Ei
I-IEEE
l=lsii
lliiill il?
II;EEH
l-l iE; fll $:S PI I Eqo EI I ?;5 0
[]g Et^t :lEll slHl €tHt rll Rll sl_l E
!
4
9 o
c
co
c
c
6
d
E
o
E
!
&
dd
0
dc>
i:E
lari
/,=
d6l!J&nq.=
\.s
cn
Jo
@
otoadt
rn
ai
g
!oF
bEEiad i=_
{E d
'EsS
c
iiH=
iEg=
co
o-
6=
,7o;c
ts
c
6a-ec!
EPEoc
Eo6
4 N
N
.,
o!oz i
9::c il3E!o!()t
t \
6tgE:t:;!o:dEIo:oj
|:
co€.aTE€gEi
E
!)
bl
b!alc
OCod
ci
,cc6
Fd
ABu6
J*3
'l 3l.!
;I E
dt g
It9
gE
-t I
lo'
ld
t
I
,r+
.stEI :
sl I
o'l
_it .
trlE
:l=(l
E
tsl
tl E
IEls
>l I
ld
lo-t*
dl '.a 6il +:t 4
EI : :
8l s d
Rl E
,d
=l c
sl E ;.!or '9
6l I
or Eii I a
s
-1 o
PN
6o9a6
46g!9c,:F:E!o
o
E
r
otofds
a
rii
o
!
GF
I
ts
,9
o
6
e
o
o
o
E
.9
o
o
o
E
o
{
0
E>
-d
:7 .l
Eri
<E
<s\b0
m
JoU
orGfc,3
ri
rii
d
o
!
GF
Big West Oil LLC, North Salt Lake, Utah
Consent Decree BWON Program
Point-Of-Generation Sampling Analytical Data
Sample D e sc ri pti o n/S am ol e Locati o n/ P h ase Collected
Sampling Frequency = Annual
121412o2314:40 121.0
oil lM4oil N/A
Water N/A
Welef .p!rp!ica!e
Water rN/A
23H-1 527 -07 DeiatterOAl Zzg-eO-1ll2310269-01 DesalterEFFLUENT-09052023
i2310269 -92 I
pesalterE FFLUENLqe0_5 ?94-fr
Annual POG - Desalter @-aOfl Etfluent
laiil7t2o23lot t
lslutrg4l
9151202315:02
101512023 8:45 5.10
101512023 8:45
111712023 9:06+-
111712023 9:06
lztatzozso.z+
ltutorzozss.4a,-# -
11t1gl2o2g 14'.37 2,1gO.O _
lve
N/A
23J04s7q1 I QegqlerElllullf-1 00523
23J0457 -02 DesalterEFFLUENT-1 00523-BD
23K0493-01 Oes'atter-f f f LUENT-Aq-1 10723
E9{q499-0? DesalterEFFLUENT-Aq-1 1 0723-BD
!QLrQ41 8-01 DesalterE!ruU!nr-t!ql!!QQz3
BWON POG - Crude Tank 43/44 Water Draw
23K0954-01 Tank44Crude-AQ-1 1 1 023
23K1243-01 Tank43Crude-AQ-1 1 1 323
BWON POG - Crude Tank 43/44 Water Draw
lzsxobs+-o2 ranr++crudeoil-1 1 1 023
23K1 243-02 I sf'rqqcfgqg-o!!1 1 1 ezs
.mgL_11t1)l2o23si48 18 -
11113/202314:37 25.4
5.58
5.46
oit .N/A
oit N/A
mg/L
1.52 oil
lDuplicate
N/A
Attachment4
Attachments Related to LDAR Reportins of Part IX (Reportine and Record Keeping)
Attachments related to LDAR audits and commercial unavailability exception and ongoing assessment of availability summary.
The following information is included in this attachment:
o LDAR CD Audit Report Summary & Corrective Actions - t[93.
o Not applicable for current reporting period.
o Commercial Unavailability Exception and Oneoine Assessment of Availability Surnmary - tll0l.d. &
1ll0l.e.
o Not applicable for current reporting period.
U.S. v. Big W6t Oil LLC, Case l: l3{{0121-BCWS
CoNnt DEre Scmi-Annual Prcgros Rsport
July 1,2023, through Dsmber 31, 2023
Attachments related to exceedances of an emission
downtime mare than 5oz5 of bnl fime per quarter.
more than lok of toal time per qwrrter and exceedances of
- 3rd Quarter 2023o W. Flare II2S 162 ppm 3-th
Refmery Fuel Gas H2S - 3td Quarter 2023
W. Flare H2S Downtime - 3rd 2023
S. Flare H2S Downtime - 3rd 2V23
U.S. v. Big LI.c, Clr I : 13{.0012 I .BCWS
C0.6t Sfin N.lPolrfrRapqt
lhu4bDmb63l,@3tuly I,
Excess Emissions Summary
Reporting Period: 3rd Quarter 2023
Source: West Flare
Pollutant: H2S
Limit 162 ppmv H2S on 3-hour rolling average
Start Date:Start
Time:Magnitude:Event Category:Description of Event
7/3/2023 15:00 175 Other Known Causes
The splitter overhead on the reformer was vented
to flare due to high ambient temperatures creating
increased pressure in the svstem.
7/17/2023 17:00 164 Unknown Causes Unknown cause
7/18/2023 18:00 163 Other Known Causes Operations blocked in valves to determine the
source of H2S; no source identified.7/18/2023 19:00 163 Other Known Causes
7/20/2023 16:00 527 Startup/Shutdown
The MSCC malfunctioned and underuvent an
unplanned shutdown.
7/20/2023 17:00 950 Startup/Shutdown
7/20/2023 18:00 973 Startuo/Shutdown
7/20/2023 19:00 531 Startu p/Shutdown
7/28/2023 16:00 177 Other Known Causes
7/28/2023 17:00 190 Other Known Causes
JPEI OLrUr r) qr o[ rEu u lE uePr uPdr [ztrr u
:ausing elevated H2S at the West Flare.7/28/2023 18:00 194 Other Known Causes
7/29/2023 16:00 165 Unknown Causes
Jnknown cause7/29/2023 17:00 180 Unknown Causes
7 /29/2023 18:00 't86 Unknown Causes
7/30/2023 17:00 162 Unknown Causes Jnknown cause
8/22/2023 7:00 192 Unknown Causes
Jnknown cause
8/22/2023 8:00 193 Unknown Causes
8/22/2023 9:00 187 Unknown Causes
8/22/2023 18:00 172 Unknown Causes
9/1/2023 12:00 175 Other Known Causes
Operations blocked in Dept. 1 and saw no change
in H25 concentration. Operations then blocked in
HDS and the H2S concentration decreased.
Operations then checked each relief valve in the9/1/2023 13:00 192 Other Known Causes
9/1/2023 14:00 183 Other Known Causes
I tyJ utilf, uuf vvo) uttoutE (v tugttttty ttlg )vutLg L
the high H2S. Operations called out
instrumentation to run a non-dailv validation on
9/1/2023 15:00 179 Other Known Causes
the West Flare's analyzer; the analyzer passed
validation.
CEMS Downtime Summary
Reporting Period: 3rd Quarter 2023
Source: Refinery Fuel Gas
Pollutant:H2S
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
TIme:
Out of
Control:Tent category:Description of Event:
7 /1 /2023 5:42 7/1/2023 7:42 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /2/2023 5:42 7 /2/2023 7:O2 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/3/2023 5:42 7/3/2023 7:O2 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/4/2023 5:42 7 /4/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/s/2023 5:42 7/s/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/6/2023 5:42 7/6/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7n/2023 5:42 7/7/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/8/2023 5:42 7/8/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/9/2023 5:42 7/9/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/10/2023 5:42 7/10/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/11/2023 5:42 7 /11 /2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/12/2023 6:03 7/12/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/13/2023 6:03 7/13/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /14/2023 6:03 7/14/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /1s/2023 6:03 7 /15/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/16/2023 6:03 7/16/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/17/2023 6:03 7/17/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/18/2023 6:03 7/18/2023 7'.33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/19/2023 6:03 7/19/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/20/2023 6:03 7/20/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/21/2023 6:03 7/21/2023 7:33 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/21/2023 14:22 7 /21 /2023 14:33 N Monitor Equipment malfunction -oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
7/22/2023 6:11 7/22/2023 7:41 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/22/2023 12:50 7/22/2023 13:01 N Monitor Eouipment malfunction -oss of communication behveen analyzer and DAS
7/23/2023 5:42 7/23/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/24/2023 5:42 7/24/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/2s/2023 5:42 7/25/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/26/2023 5'.42 7/26/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/26/2023 8:44 7/26/2023 8:45 N Monitor Equipment malfunction -oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
7/26/2023 8:49 7/26/2023 8:50 N Monitor Equipment malfunction -oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
7/27/2023 5:42 7/27/2023 7:02 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /28/2023 6:03 7/28/?023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/28/2023 12:57 7/28/2023 I3:08 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction -oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
7/28/2023 13:19 7/28/2023 13:50 N Monitor Equipment malfunction -oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
7/28/2023 14:01 7/28/2023 14:07 N Monitor Eouipment malfunction oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
7/29/2023 5:03 7/29/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/30/2023 6:03 7/30/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/31/2023 6:03 7/31/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/1/2023 6:03 8/1/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/2/2023 6:03 8/2/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
8/3/2023 6:03 8/3/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/4/2023 6:03 8/4/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations failv Validation
8/s/2023 5:03 8/5/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/6/2023 6:03 8/6/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/7/2023 6:03 8/7/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/8/2023 6:03 8/8/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/9/2023 5:03 8/9/2023 7:16 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
8/10/2023 6:03 8/10/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/11/2023 6:03 8/11/2023 7:36 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/12/2023 1 3:19 8/12/2023 15:44 N Other Known Causes Maintenance and recalibration
8/12/2023 16:34 8/12/2023 16.42 N Monitor EouiDment malfunction Loss of communication bewveen analyzer and DAS
8/12/2023 17:00 8/12/2023 l7:06 N Monitor Equipment malfunction Loss of communication between analyzer and DAS
8/13/2023 6:22 8/13/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:Event Category:Description of Event:
8/13/2023 13:41 e/13/2023 13:48 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction -oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
8/14/2023 6:22 8/14/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/15/2023 6:22 8/15/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/16/2023 6:22 8/16/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/16/2023 12:52 8/16/2023 13:.02 N Monitor Equipment malfunction .oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
8/16/2023 13:28 8/16/2023 13:33 N Monitor EouiDment malfunction -oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
8/17/2023 6:22 8/17/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/17/2023 10:54 8/17/2023 10.57 N Monitor Eouipment malfunction .oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
8/17/2023 11:46 8/17/2023 11:52 N Monitor Equioment malfunction -oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
8/18/2023 6:22 8/18/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/19/2023 6:22 8/19/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/20/2023 6:22 8/20/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/21/2023 6:22 8/21/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/22/2023 6:22 8/22/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/23/2023 6:22 8/23/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/24/2023 6'.22 8/24/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/25/2023 6:22 8/2s/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/?6/2023 6:22 8/26/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/27/2023 6:22 8/27/2023 746 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/28/2023 6:22 8/28/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/29/2023 6:22 8/29/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/30/2023 6:22 8/30/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/31/2023 6:22 8/31/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/1/2023 6:22 9/1/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/2/2023 6:22 9/2/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/3/2023 6"22 9/3/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/4/2023 6:22 9/4/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/s/2023 6:22 9/s/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/6/2023 6:22 9/6/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9n/2023 6:22 9/7/2023 7:46 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/8/2023 6:22 9/8/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/9/2023 6:22 9/9/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/10/2023 6:22 9/10/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/11/2023 6'.22 9/11/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/11/2023 10:1 5 9/11/2023 1 1:58 N QA Calibrations 3GA/ouarterlv validation
9/12/2023 6:22 9/12/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/13/2023 6:22 9/13/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/14/2023 6:22 9/14/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/15/2023 6:22 9/1s/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/16/2023 6:05 9/16/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/17/2023 6:04 9/17/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/17 /2023 12:36 9/17/2023 13:30 N QA Calibrations lecalibration
9/18/2023 6:04 9/18/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/19/2023 5:2 9/19/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/20/2023 6:2 9/20/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/21/2023 6:2 9/21/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/22/2023 6:2 9/22/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/23/2023 6:2 9/23/2023 7(n N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/24/2023 6:2 9/24/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/25/2023 6:2 9/2s/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/26/2023 6:2 9/26/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/27/2023 6:2 9/27/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/28/2023 6:2 9/28/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/29/2023 6:2 9/29/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/30/2023 6:2 9/30/2023 7:50 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
CEMS Downtime Summary
Reporting Period: 3rd Quarter 2023
Source: W. Flare
Pollutant:H2S
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:Event CateSory:Description of Event:
7/1/2023 1:05 7 /1/2023 1:16 N Other Known Causes !lowback
7/1/2023 5:11 7/1/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/1/2023 8:03 7/1/2023 8:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/1/2023 1 5:05 7/1/2023 15:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/1/2023 22:05 7/1/2023 22:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/2/2023 5:05 7/2/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/2/2023 12:05 7/2/2023 12:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/2/2023 19:05 7/2/2023 19:16 N Other Known Causes Ilowback
7/3/2023 2:05 7/3/2023 2:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/3/2023 5:03 7/3/2023 5:08 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/3/2023 5:1 1 7/3/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/3/2023 9:05 7/3/2023 9:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /3/2023 16:05 7/3/2023 16:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/3/2023 23:05 7/3/2023 23'.16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/4/2023 5:11 7/4/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/4/2023 6:05 7/4/2023 6:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/4/2023 13:05 7/4/2023 13:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/4/2023 20:05 7/4/2023 20:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/5/2023 3:05 7/s/2023 3:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /5/2023 5:1 1 7/5/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/5/2023 10:05 7/s/2023 10:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/s/2023 17:OS 7/s/2023 17:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/6/2023 0:05 7/6/2023 0:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/6/2023 5:1 1 7/6/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/6/2023 7:05 7 /6/2023 7:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/6/2023 10:46 7/6/2023 1 1:13 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/6/2023 '14:05 7/6/2023 14:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/6/2023 21:05 7/6/2023 21:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7n/2023 4:05 7/7/2023 4:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7n/2023 5:04 7/7/2023 5:08 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
717/2023 5:11 7/7/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7n/2023 1 1:05 7/7/2023 1'l:'16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7n/2023 18:05 7 /7 /2023 18:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/8/2023 1:05 7/e/2023 1:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/8/2023 5:05 7/8/2023 5:09 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/8/2023 5:12 7/8/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/8/2023 8:05 7 /8/2023 8: 16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/8/2023 '15:05 7/8/2023 1 5:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/8/2023 22:06 7/8/2023 22:.16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /9/2023 5:05 7 /9/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/9/2023 8:02 7/9/2023 8:06 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/9/2023 12:06 7/9/2023 12:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /10/2023 2:06 7/10/2023 2:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/10/2023 5:12 7/10/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/10/2023 9:05 7/10/2023 9:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /10/2023 16:06 7/10/2023 16:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /10/2023 23:06 7/10/2023 23 l6 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/11/2023 5:12 7 /1 1 /2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/11/2023 5:06 7/11/2023 6:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /11 /2023 13:06 7/11/2023 13:'16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /11 /2023 13:51 7/11/2023 14 13 N Other Known Causes Maintenance and recalibration
7/11/2023 14.26 7/11/2023 14:.45 N Other Known Causes vlaintenance and recalibration
7 /11/2023 20:05 7/11/2023 2O:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
fime:
Out of
Control:Event Cateoorv:Description of Event:
7/12/2023 3:06 7/12/2023 3:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /12/2023 5:12 7/12/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/12/2023 10:06 7/12/2023 10:'16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/12/2023 17:.06 7/12/2023 17:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/13/2023 0:06 7/13/2023 0:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /13/2023 5:1 1 7/13/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/13/2023 7:06 7/13/2023 7:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/13/2023 8:01 7/13/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/13/2023 14:OG 7/13/2023 1416 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /13/2023 21:06 7/13/2023 21:16 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/14/2023 4:06 7/14/2023 4'.16 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
7/14/2023 5:12 7/14/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/14/2023 8:01 7/14/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/14/2023 'I 'l:06 7/14/2023 'I 1:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/14/2023 18:06 7/14/2023 '18:1 6 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/1s/2023 1:06 7/15/2023 1:1 6 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/15/2023 4:57 7/15/2023 5:01 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/1s/2023 5:12 7/1s/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/1s/2023 8:06 7/15/2023 8:'16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /15/2023 15:06 7 /15/2023 15:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/15/2023 22:06 7/1s/2023 22:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/16/2023 5:05 7/16/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/16/2023 12:06 7/16/2023 12:16 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/16/2023 19:06 7/16/2023 19:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/17/2023 2:06 7/17/2023 2:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/17/2023 5:12 7/17/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/17/2023 8:01 7/17/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/17/2023 9:06 7 /17 /2023 9:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/17/2023 16:06 7 /17 /2023 16:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/17/2023 23:06 7/17/2023 23:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/18/2023 5:12 7/18/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/18/2023 6:06 7/18/2023 6:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/18/2023 13:05 7/18/2023 13:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/8/2023 20:06 7/18/2023 20:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/9/2023 3:06 7/19/2023 3:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/9/2023 4:57 7/19/2023 5:02 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/9/2023 5:12 7/19/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/9/2023 8:01 7/19/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/9/2023 10:06 7/19/2023 10:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/9/2023 17:06 7/19/2023 17:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/20/2023 0:06 7/20/2023 0:7 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/20/2023 5:12 7/20/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/20/2023 7:05 7/20/2023 7:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/20/2023 8:01 7/20/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/20/2023 14:06 7/20/2023 14:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/20/2023 21:06 7/20/2023 21:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/21/2023 4:06 7/21/2023 4:7 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/21/2023 4:58 7/21/2023 5:02 N Other Known Causes )lowback
7/21/2023 5:12 7/21/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/21/2023 1 1:06 7/21/2023 11:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/21/2023 18:06 7/21/2023 18:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/22/2023 1:06 7/22/2023 1:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /22/2023 5:12 7 /22/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/22/2023 8:01 7/22/2023 8:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/22/2023 15:06 7/22/2023 15:17 N Other Known Causes Slowback
7/22/2023 22:06 7/22/2023 22:17 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
7/23/2023 4:58 7/23/2023 5:02 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/23/2023 5:05 7/23/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
out ot
Control:
I
Eyent Cateqory:Description of Event:
7/23/2023 12:05 7/23/2023 12:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /23/2023 19:06 7/23/2023 19:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/24/2023 2:06 7/24/2023 2:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/24/2023 5:12 7/24/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
7/24/2023 8:01 7/24/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/24/2023 9:06 7/24/2023 9:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/24/2023 16:06 7/24/2023 16:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/24/2023 23:06 7/24/2023 23:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/25/2023 5:12 7/25/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/25/2023 6:06 7/2s/2023 6:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/2s/2023 8:01 7/25/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/25/2023 13:05 7/2s/2023 13:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/25/2023 20:06 7/25/2023 20:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/26/2023 3:06 7/26/2023 3:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/26/2023 5:12 7/26/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
7/26/2023 8:01 7/26/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /26/2023 10:06 7/26/2023 l0:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/26/2023 17:06 7/26/2023 17:17 N Other Known Causes Slowback
7/27/2023 0:06 7/27/2023 0:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/27/2023 5:12 7/27/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /27 /2023 7:06 7/27/2023 7:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/27/2023 14:06 7/27/2023 14 17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/27/2023 21.06 7/27/2023 21 17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/28/2023 4:06 7/28/2023 4:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/2e/2023 5:12 7/28/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
7/28/2023 1 1:06 7/28/2023 'I
1 17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/28/2023 18:06 7/28/2023 18:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /29/2023 1:06 7/29/2023 1:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /29/2023 4:59 7/29t2023 5:03 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/29/2023 5:12 7/29/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/29/2023 8:05 7/29/2023 8:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/29/2023 15:06 7/29/2023 15:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /29/2023 22:06 7/29/2023 2?:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/30/2023 5:06 7/30/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/30/2023 12:06 7/30/2023 12:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /30/2023 19:06 7/30/2023 19:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/31/2023 2.06 7/3 /2023 2:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/31/2023 5:12 7/3 /2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/31/2023 9:06 tl5 /2023 9:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /31 /2023 16:06 u5 /2023 16:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /31 /2023 23:06 u5 /2023 23:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1/2023 5:12 8/1/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/1/2023 6:06 8/1/2021 6:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1/2023 8:01 8/1/2023 8:09 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1/2023 13:06 8/1/2023 13:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/1/2023 20:06 8/1/2023 2O:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/2/2023 3:06 8/2/2023 3:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/2/2023 5:12 8/2/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/2/2023 '10:06 8/2/2023 10:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/2/2023 17:06 8/2/2023 17:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/3/2023 0:06 8/3/2023 O:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/3/2023 >.1z 8/3/20?3 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/3/2023 7:06 8/3/2023 7:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/3/2023 8:01 8/3/2023 8:06 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/3/2023 14:06 8/3/2023 14:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/3/2023 21:06 8/3/2023 21:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/4/2023 4:05 8/4/2023 4:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/4/2023 5:12 8/4/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
ltme:
Out of
Control:Event Cateoorv:Description of Event:
8/4/2023 1 1:06 8/4/2023 11:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/4/2023 18:06 8/4/2023 18:.17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/s/2023 1:06 8/s/2023 1:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/5/2023 5:12 8/s/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/s/2023 8:06 8/s/2023 8:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/5/2023 15:05 8/s/2023 1 5:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/5/2023 22:06 8/5/2023 22:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/6/2023 5:06 8/6/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/6/2023 8:02 e/6/2023 8:06 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/6/2023 12:06 8/6/2023 12:17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/6/2023 19:06 8/6/2023 19'.17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/7/2023 2:06 8/7/2023 2:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7/2023 5:12 8/7/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8n/2023 8:02 8/7/2023 8:06 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7/2023 9:06 8/7/2023 9:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8n/2023 16:06 8/7/2023 16:.17 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8n/2023 23:06 8/7/2023 23:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/8/2023 5:12 8/8/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
8/8/2023 6:06 8/8/2023 6:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/8/2023 8:02 8/8/2023 8:06 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/8/2023 13:06 8/8/2023 13:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/8/2023 20:06 8/8/2023 2O:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/9/2023 3:06 8/9/2023 3:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/9/2023 5:12 8/9/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
8/9/2023 '10:06 8/9/2023 1O:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/9/2023 17:06 8/9/2023 17:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/0/2023 0:06 8/10/2023 0:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/0/2023 5:12 8/10/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
8/0/2023 7:06 8/10/2023 7:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/0/2023 '14:06 8/10/2023 14:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/0/2023 21:06 8/10/2023 21:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/1/2023 4:06 8/11/2023 4:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/1/2023 5:12 8/11/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/1/2023 8:27 8/11/2023 8:32 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/11/2023 1 1:06 8/11/2023 11:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/11/2023 '18:06 8/11/2023 18:17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/2/2023 1:06 8/12/2023 1'.17 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/2/2023 5:12 8/12/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/2/2023 8:01 8/12/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/2/2023 8:07 8/12/2023 8:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/2/2023 15:07 8/12/2023 15 17 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
8/2/2023 22:07 8/12/2023 22:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/13/2023 5:07 8/13/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/13/2023 12:07 8/13/2023 12 t7 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/13/2023 19:07 8/13/2023 19:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/14/2023 2:07 8/14/2023 2:17 N Other Knovrn Causes llowback
8/14/2023 5:12 8/14/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/14/2023 9:07 8/14/2023 9:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/14/2023 10:27 8/14/2023 1 1:20 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/14/2023 16:07 8/14/2023 16:.17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/14/2023 23:07 8/14/2023 23:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1s/2023 5:12 8/1s/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/1s/2023 6:07 8/5/2023 6:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1s/2023 8:0'l 8/s/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1s/2023 8:09 8/s/2023 11:32 N QA Calibrations IGA/quarterlv validation
8/1s/2023 13:07 8/5/2023 13:17 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1s/2023 20:07 8/5/2023 20:1 8 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/16/2023 3:07 8/16/2023 3:1 8 N Other Known Causes llowback
Start Date:
Start
fime:End Date:
End
fime:
Out of
Control:Evert Categors Description of Event:
8/6/2023 5:12 el16/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/6/2023 10:07 8/16/2023 10:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/6/2023 17:07 8/16/2023 17:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7 /2023 0:07 8/17/2023 0:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7/2023 5:12 8/17/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/7/2023 7'.O7 8117/2023 7..8 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7 /2023 14:07 8/17/2023 14:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7/2023 21:07 8/17/2023 21:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/8/2023 4:O7 8/18/2023 4:8 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/18/20?3 5:12 8/18/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/18/2023 11:07 8/18/2023 11:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/18/2023 i 8:07 8/18/2023 18:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/19/2023 'l:07 8/19/2023 1: l8 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/19/2023 5:12 8/19/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/19/2023 8:07 8/19/2023 8:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/19/2023 15.07 8/19/2023 1 5:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/19/2023 22:07 8/19/2023 22:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/20/2023 5:07 8/20/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/20/2023 1207 8/20/2023 12:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/20/2023 19:07 8/20/2023 19:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/21/2023 2:07 8/21/2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/21/2023 5:12 8/21/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/21/2023 8:01 8/21/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/21/2023 9:07 8/21/2023 9:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/21/2023 1607 8/21/2023 16:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/21/2023 23:07 8/21/2023 23:.18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
B/22/2023 4:57 8/22/2023 5:01 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/22/2023 5'.12 8/22/2023 5:58 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/22/2023 6:07 8/22/2023 6:18 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/22/2023 13:07 8/22/2023 '13:18 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
8/22/2023 2O:07 8/22/2023 20:1 8 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/23/2023 3:07 8/23/2023 3:18 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
8/23/2023 4:58 8/23/2023 5:O2 N Other Known Causes llowback
8t23/2023 5:12 8/23/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/23/2023 10:07 8/23/2023 10:18 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/23/2023 17:07 8/23/2023 17:18 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
8/24/2023 0:07 8/24/2023 0:'18 N Other Known Causes Slowback
8/24/2023 5:12 8/24/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/24/2023 7:07 8/24/2023 7:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/24/2023 14:O7 8/24/2023 '14:18 N Other Known Causes Slowback
8/24/2023 2107 8/24/2023 21:18 N Other Known Causes Ilowback
8/2s/2023 4:07 8/2s/2023 4:18 N Other Known Causes ilowback
8/2s/2023 5:12 8/25/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/25/2023 8:01 8/25t2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/2s/2023 11:07 8/25/2023 t 1:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/2s/2023 18:07 8/2s/2023 18:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/26/2023 1:07 8/26/2023 1:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/26/2023 4:58 8/26t2023 5:02 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/26/2023 5:12 8/26/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/26/2023 8:07 8/26/2023 8:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/26/2023 15:07 8/26/2023 t 5:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/26/2023 22:07 8/26/2023 22l.18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/27/2023 5:07 8/27/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/27/2023 12:07 8/27/2023 12:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/27 /2023 19:07 8/27/2023 19:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/28/2023 2:07 8/28/2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/28/2023 5:12 8/28/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/28/2023 9:07 8/28/2023 9:18 N Other Known Causes )lowback
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:Event Cateqorv:Description of Event
8/28/2023 1607 8/28/2023 16:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/28/2023 23:O7 8/28/2023 23 18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/29/2023 5:12 8/29/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/29/2023 6:07 8/29/2023 6:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/29/2023 13:07 8/29/2023 13:1 8 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/29/2023 20:07 8/29/2023 20:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/30/2023 3:07 8/30/2023 3:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/30/2023 S:12 8/30/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/30/2023 8:28 8/30/2023 9:04 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction -oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
8/30/2023 10:07 8/30/2023 10:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/30/2023 17:07 8/30/2023 17:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 0:07 8/3 /2023 0:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 5:12 8/3 /2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/31/2023 7:07 8/3 2021 7:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 8:01 8/3 /2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 14:07 8/3 2023 14:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 21:07 8/3 2023 2118 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/1/2023 4:07 9/1/2023 4:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/1/2023 5:12 9/1/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/1/2023 8:01 9/1/2023 8:10 N Other Known Causes \nalvzer filter clean out/replacement
9/1/2023 11:07 9/1/2023 1 1:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/1/2023 17:57 9/1/2023 l8:45 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/2/2023 1:07 9/2/2023 1:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2/2023 5:12 9/2/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/2/2023 8:06 9/2/2023 8: 10 N Other Known Causes !lowback
9/2/2023 15:05 9/2/2023 15:09 N Other Known Causes )lowback
9/2/2023 22:07 9/2/2023 22:11 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
9/3/2023 5:12 9/3/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/3/2023 12.06 9/3/2023 12:10 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/3/2023 19:06 9/3/2023 19:10 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/4/2023 2:06 9/4/2023 2:10 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/4/2023 5:12 9/4/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/4/2023 9:07 9/4/2023 9:18 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
9/4/2023 '16:07 9/4/2023 16:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/4/2023 23:07 9/4/2023 23:i 8 N Other Known Causes Slowback
9/s/2023 5:12 9/5/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/5/2023 6:07 9/s/2023 6:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/s/2023 13:07 9/5/2023 13:1 8 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/5/2023 20:07 9/s/2023 20:1 8 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
9/6/2023 3:07 9/6/2023 3:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/6/2023 4:57 9/6/2023 5:01 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/6/2023 5:12 9/6/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/6/2023 10:07 9/6/2023 10:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/6/2023 17:07 9/6/2023 17:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9n/2023 0:07 9/7/2023 0:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9n/2023 5:12 9/7/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/7/2023 7:07 9/1/2023 7:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
efi/2023 1407 9/7/2023 14:18 N Other Known Causes Slowback
9/7/2023 21:07 9/7/2023 21:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/8/2023 4:07 9/8/2023 4:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/8/2023 4:58 9/8/2023 5:02 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/8/2023 5:12 9/8/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/8/2023 11:O7 9/8/2023 1 1:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/8/2023 18:07 9/8/2023 18:18 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/9/2023 1:07 9/9/2023 1 :18 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/9/2023 5:12 9/9/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
9/9/2023 8:07 9/9/2023 8:11 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/9/2023 15:07 9/9/2023 15:11 N Other Known Causes Blowback
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:rent Category:Description of Event:
9/9/2023 22.07 9/9/2023 22:11 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/10/2023 5:12 9/10/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/10/2023 12:07 9/10/2023 12:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/10/2023 19.07 9/1O/2023 19:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/11/2023 2:07 9/1 /2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/11/2023 4:58 9/1 /2023 5:02 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/11/2023 5:12 9/1 /2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/11/2023 9:08 9/1 /2023 9:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/11/2023 16:07 9/11/2023 l6:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/11/2023 23:O7 9/11/2023 23:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/12/2023 5:12 9/12/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/12/2023 6:07 9/12/2023 6: 18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9t12/2023 8:01 9/12/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/12/2023 13:07 9/12/2023 13:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/12/2023 20:08 9/12/2023 20:1 8 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/13/2023 3.07 9/13/2023 3:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/13/2023 5:12 9/13/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/13/2023 10:08 9/13/2023 10:l8 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/13/2023 18:08 9/13/2023 18:18 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
9/14/2023 2:08 9/14/2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/14/2023 4:59 9/14/2023 5:03 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/14/2023 5:12 9/14/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/14/2023 10:08 9/14/2023 10:18 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/14/2023 '18:08 9/14/2023 18:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/15/2023 2:08 9/1s/2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes Jlowback
9/15/2023 5:12 9/15/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
9/1s/2023 8:01 9/15/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/15/2023 10:08 9/1s/2023 '10:'18 N Other Known Causes )lowback
9/15/2023 18:08 9/1s/2023 18:18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/16/2023 2:08 9/16/2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/16/2023 5:12 9/16/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/16/2023 8:01 9/16/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/16/2023 10:08 9/16/2023 10:1 8 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/16/2023 18:08 9/16/2023 18:'18 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/17/2023 2:08 9/17/2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/17 /2023 5:12 9/17/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/17/2023 10:08 9/17/2023 10:'l 8 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/17/2023 18:08 9/17/2023 18:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/18/2023 2:08 9/18/2023 2:18 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/18/2023 5:12 9/18/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/18/2023 10:08 9/18/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/18/2023 18:08 9/18/2023 '18:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/19/2023 2:08 9/19/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/19/2023 5:12 9/19/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/19/2023 10:08 9/19/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/19/2023 18:08 9/19/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/20/2023 2:08 9/20/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/20/2023 5:12 9/20/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/20/2023 '10:08 9/20/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes Jlowback
9/20/2023 l8:08 9/20/2023 18 l9 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/21/2023 2:08 9/21/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2 /2023 5:12 9/21/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/2 /2023 10:08 9t21/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
a//2023 l3:50 9/21/2023 15:08 N Other Known Causes vlaintenance and recalibration
9/2 /2023 '18:08 s/21/2023 18:'19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/22/2023 2:OB 9/22/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/22/2023 5:12 9/22/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/22/2023 '10:08 9/22/2023 10:1 9 N Other Known Causes llowback
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Xme:
Out of
Control:Event Category:Description of Event:
9/22/2023 18:08 9/22/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/23/2023 2:08 9/23/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/23/2023 5:12 9/23/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/23/2023 10:08 9/23/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/23/2023 18:08 9/23/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/24/2023 2:08 9/24/2023 2'.19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/24/2023 5:12 9/24/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/24/2023 10:08 9/24/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/24/2023 18:08 9/24/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2s/2023 2:08 9/25/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2s/2023 5:12 9/25/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/Zs/2023 10:08 9/25/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/25/202t 18:08 9/2s/2023 '18:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/26/2023 2:08 9/26/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/26/2023 5:12 9/26/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/26/2023 10:08 9/26/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/26/2023 18:08 9/26/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/27/2023 2:08 9/27/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/27/2023 5:13 9/27/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/27/2023 10:08 9/27/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/27 /2023 18:08 9/27/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/28/2023 2:08 9/28/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowbark
9/28/2023 5: 13 9/28/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/28/2023 10:08 9/28/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/28/2023 10:35 9/28/2023 11:47 N Other Known Causes \nalyzer filter clean out/replacement
9/28/2023 18:08 9/28/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/29/2023 2:08 9/29/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/29/2023 4:56 9/29/2023 5:00 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/29/2023 5:13 9/29/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/29/2023 8:01 9/29/2023 8:05 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/29/2023 '10:08 9/29/2023 10:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/29/2023 18:08 9/29/2023 l8:37 N Monitor Equipment malfunction
lhe analyzer's controller experienced an error that
:aused it to rapidly switch between the primary and
;econdarv filaments.
9/29/2023 21:16 9/29/2023 22:10 N Monitor Equipment malfunction
lhe analyzer's controller experienced an error that
:aused it to rapidly switch between the primary and
;econdarv filaments.
9/30/2023 2:08 9/30/2023 2:19 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/30/2023 4:56 9/30/2023 5:00 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/30/2023 5:12 9/30/2023 5:59 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/30/2023 9:29 9/30/2023 1 1:30 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/30/2023 '18:08 9/30/2023 18:19 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
CEMS Downtime Summary
Reporting Period: 3rd Quarter 2023
Source: S. Flare
Pollutant:H2S
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:
tI
dvent Category:Description of Event:
7/1/2023 1:44 7/1/2023 1:49 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /1 /2023 5:18 7 /1 /2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
7 /1/2023 8:M 7/1/2023 8:49 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/1/2023 15:M 7 /1 /2023 15:49 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/1/2023 22:M 7/1/2023 22:49 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /Z/2023 5:18 7 /2/2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validatron
7/2/2023 12:44 7/2/2023 12:49 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/2/2023 19.44 7/2/2023 19:49 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /3/2023 2:M 7/3/2023 2:49 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/3/2023 5:18 7 /3/2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
7/3/2023 9:44 7/3/2023 9:50 N Other Known Causes Slowback
7 /3/2023 16:44 7/3/2023 16:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /3/2023 23:44 7 /3/2023 23:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/4/2023 5:18 7/4/2023 6:06 N OA Calibrations Dailv Validation
7/4/2023 6:44 7/4/2023 6:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /4/2023 13:44 7/4/2023 l3:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/4/2023 20:44 7/4/2023 20:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/s/2023 3:M 7/s/2023 3:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/5/2023 5:18 7/s/2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
7 /5/2023 10:31 7 /5/2023 1 1:33 N QA Calibrations Recalibration
7/s/2023 17:M 7 /5/2023 17:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/6/2023 0:M 7/6/2023 0:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/6/2023 5:18 7/6/2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
7/6/2023 7:44 7 /6/2023 7:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/6/2023 8:1 1 7/6/2023 9:00 N Monitor Equipment malfunction Loss of communication between analyzer and DAS
7/6/2023 14:M 7/6/2023 l4:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/6/2023 21.44 7/6/2023 21:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 /7 /2023 4:44 7/7/2023 4:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7fi/2023 5:18 7 /7 /2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
7fi/2023 11:44 7/7/2023 1 1:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7n/2023 18:44 7/7/2023 18:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/8/2023 1.44 7 /8/2023 1:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/8/2023 5:18 7/8/2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/8/2023 8:44 7/8/2023 8:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /8/2023 13:37 7 /8/2023 13:53 N QA Calibrations lecalibration
7/8/2023 15.44 7 /8/2023 15:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/8/202t 22:44 7/8/2023 22:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/9/2023 5: 18 7/9/2023 6:06 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /9/2023 12:M 7 /9/2023 l2:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/9/2023 19:M 7 /9/?023 19:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/10/2023 2:44 7/10/2023 2:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7 /10/2023 5:18 7/10/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/10/2023 9:44 7/10/2023 9:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/10/2023 16:M 7/10/2023 l5:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /10/2023 23:44 7/10/2023 23:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /11 /2023 5:18 7 /11/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /11 /2023 6:44 7 /11/2023 6:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/11/2023 13:44 7 /11/2023 13:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /11/2023 2O:44 7 /11/2023 20:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /12/2023 3:44 7t12/2023 3:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/12/2023 5:18 7/12/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/12/2023 1O:M 7/12/2023 11:41 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction -oss of communication bewveen analyzer and DAS
7 /12/2023 17.44 7/12/2023 17:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
Start Date:
start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:Evont Category:Description of Event:
7 3/2023 O:44 7/13/2023 0:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 3/2023 5:18 7/13/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 3/2023 7:44 7/13/2023 7:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7 3/2023 14:44 7/13/2023 14:50 N Other Known Causes Slowback
7 3/2023 21.M 7/13/2023 21:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 4/2023 4:M 7/14/2023 4:50 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
7 4/2023 5:18 7/14/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/14/2023 11:M 7/14/2023 1 1:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/14/2023 18:44 7/14/2023 1 8:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/15/20?3 1:M 7/15/2023 1:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/1s/2023 5:18 7/15/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/1s/2023 8:44 7/1s/2023 8:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/15/2023 15:44 7/15/2023 1 5:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/15/2023 22:M 7/15/2023 22:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/16/2023 5:18 7/16/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7 6/2023 12:M 7/16/2023 12:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 6/2023 19:44 7/16/2023 1 9:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 7/2023 ZM 7/17/2023 2:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 7/2023 5:18 7/17/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 7/2023 9:M 7/17/2023 9:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/17/2023 16:44 7/17/2023 l6:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/17/2023 23:M 7/17/2023 23:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /18/2023 5:18 7/18/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/18/2023 6:44 7/18/2023 5:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/18/2023 10:14 7/1e/2023 11:02 N QA Calibrations leca libration
7/18/2023 13:44 7/18/2023 I 3:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/18/2023 20:44 7/18/2023 20:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /19/202.3 3:M 7/19/2023 3:50 N Other Known Causes llowbark
7/19/2023 5:18 7 /19/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /19/2023 1O:M 7/19/2023 10:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/19/2023 17:44 7/19/2023 17:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/20/2023 0:44 7/20/2023 0:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/20/2023 5:18 7/20/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/20/2023 7:M 7/20/2023 7:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/20/2023 14:44 7/20/2023 14:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/20/2023 21:44 7/20/2023 2 l:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/21/2023 4:44 7/21/2023 4:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/21/2023 5:18 7/21/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/21/2023 9:55 7/21/2023 11:07 N QA Calibrations lecalibration
7/2',t/2023 11:M 7/21/2023 1 1:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/21/2023 18:M 7/21/2023 18:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/22/2023 1:44 7/22/2023 1:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
7/22/2023 5:18 7/22/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/22/2023 8:44 7/2212023 8:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/22/2023 8:55 7/22/2023 9:19 N Monitor Equipment malfunction ioss of communication between analyzer and DAS
7 /22/2023 '15:03 7/23/2023 15:12 Monitor Equipment malfunction
The CEMS shelter HVAC failed, causing inaccurate
readinos.
7/23/2023 19:M 7/23/2023 19:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/24/2023 2:M 7/24/2023 2:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/24/2023 5:18 7/24/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/24/2023 8:38 7/24/2023 9:03 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction Loss of communication between analvzer and DAS
7/24/2023 9:06 7/24/2023 9:33 N Monitor Equipment malfunction Loss of communication between analvzer and DAS
7/24/2023 9:35 7/24/2023 10:03 N QA Calibrations lecalibration
7/24/2023 16:M 7/24/2023 1 6:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/24/2023 23:M 7/24/2023 23:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/2s/2023 5:18 7/2s/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/25/2023 6:44 7/25/2023 6:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/25/2023 8:34 7 /25/2023 8:58 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction -oss of communication between analvzer and DAS
Start Date:
Start
fime:End Date:
End
Tme:
Out of
Control:Event Category:Description of Event:
7/2s/2023 1}M 7/25/2023 13:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/25/2023 20:M 7/25/2023 20:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /26/2023 3:44 7/26/2023 3:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/26/2023 5:18 7/26/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
7/26/2023 1O:44 7/26/2023 10:50 N Other Know Causes llowback
7 /26/2023 17:44 7/26/2023 17:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/27/2023 0:44 7/27/2023 0:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/27/2023 5:18 7/27/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7 /27 /2023 7:44 7/27/2023 7:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7 /27 /2023 14:44 7/27/2023 14:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/27/2023 21'.M 7/27/2023 21:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/28/2023 4:44 7/28/2023 4:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/28/2023 5:18 7/28/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
7/28/2023 11:M 7/28/2023 1 1:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/28/2023 1&M 7/28/2023 18:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/29/2023 1:44 7/29/2023 l:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/29/2023 5:18 7/29/?023 6:O7 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/29/2023 8:44 7t29/2023 8:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
7/29/2023 15:44 7/29/2023 15:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/29/2023 72:44 7/29/2023 22:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/30/2023 5:'18 7/30/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
7/30/2023 12:44 7/30/2023 12:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/30/2023 19:M 7/30/2023 '19:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/31/2023 2:44 7/31/2023 2:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/31/2023 5:18 7/31/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
7/31/2023 9:44 7/)1/2023 9:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/31/2023 16:44 7/31/2023 l6:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
7/31/2023 23.M 7/31/2023 23:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/1/2023 5:18 8/1/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/1/2023 6:45 8/1/2023 6:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/1/2023 13:45 8/1/2023 1 3:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/1/2023 20:45 8/1/2023 20:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/2/2023 3:45 8/2/2023 3:50 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/2/2023 5:18 8/2/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
8/2/2023 10:45 8/2/2023 1 0:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/2/2023 17:45 8/2/2023 1 7:50 N Other Known Causes )lowback
8/3/2023 0:45 8/3/2023 0:50 N Other Known Causes )lowback
8/3/2023 5:18 8/3/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/3/2023 7:45 8/3/2023 7:50 N Other Known Causes Ilowback
8/3/2023 14.45 8/3/2023 '14:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/3/2023 21:45 8/3/2023 21:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/4/2023 4:45 8/4/2023 4:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/4/2023 5:18 8/4/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/4/2023 11:45 8/4/2023 1 1:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/4/2023 18:45 8/4/2023 18:50 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/5/2023 1:45 8/5/2023 1:50 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/5/2023 5:18 B/s/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/s/2023 845 8/s/2023 8:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/5/2023 15:45 8/5/2023 15:5 1 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/5/2023 22:45 8/s/2023 22:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/6/2023 5:18 8/6/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/6/2023 12:45 8/6/2023 12:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/6/2023 19:45 8/6/2023 19:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8n/2023 2:45 8/7/2023 2:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7/2023 5:18 8/7/2023 6:O7 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8n/2023 9:45 gfi/2023 9:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8n/2023 16:45 8/7/2023 16:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8n/2023 23:45 8/7/2023 23:.51 N Other Known Causes llowhack
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:Event Cateqorv:Descriotion of Event:
8/8/2023 5: 18 8/8/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/8/2023 6:45 8/8/2023 5:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/8/2023 13:45 8/8/2023 13:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/8/2023 20:45 8/8/2023 20:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/9/2023 3:45 8/9/2023 3:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/9/2023 5:18 8/9/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/9/2023 10:45 8/9/2023 10:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/9/2023 17:45 8/9/2023 17:5'1 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/10/2023 0:45 8/10/2023 0:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/10/2023 5:19 8/10/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/10/2023 7:45 8/10/2023 7:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/10/2023 13:59 8/10/2023 15:10 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction -oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
8/10/2023 21:45 8/10/2023 21:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/11/2023 4:45 8/11/2023 4:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/11/2023 5:19 8/11/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/11/2023 8:06 8/11/2023 8:22 N Monitor Equipment malfunction -oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
8/11/2023 11:45 8/11/2023 1'l:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/11/2023 18:45 8/11/2023 18:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/12/2023 1:45 8/12/2023 1:5 1 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/12/2023 5:19 8/12/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/12/2023 8:45 8/12/2023 8:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/12/2023 15:45 e/12/2023 15:5'l N Other Known Causes llowback
8/12/2023 22:45 8/12/2023 22:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/13/2023 5:19 8/13/2023 6'.07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/13/2023 12.45 8/13/2023 12:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/13/2023 19:45 8/13/2023 19:51 N Other Known Causes llowba.k
8/14/2023 2:45 8/14/2023 2:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/14/2023 5:19 8/14/2023 6:01 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/14/2023 9:45 8/14/2023 9:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/14/2023 16:45 8/14/2023 16:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/14/2023 23:45 8/14/2023 23:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/15/2023 5:19 8/1s/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/1s/2023 6:45 8/1s/2023 6:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/15/20?3 13:45 8/15/2023 13:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/1s/2023 20:45 8/1s/2023 20:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/16/2023 3:45 8/16/2023 3:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/6/2023 5:19 8/16/2023 6.07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/6/2023 10:45 8/6/2023 10:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/6/2023 17:45 8/6/2023 17:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/7/2023 0:45 8/7/2023 0:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/7/2023 5:19 8/7/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/7/2023 7:45 8/17/2023 7:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7/2023 14:45 8/17/2023 14:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/7/2023 21:45 8/17/2023 21:5 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/18/2023 4:45 8/1e/2023 4:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/18/2023 5:19 8/18/2023 6:0 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/18/2023 11:45 8/18/2023 1 1:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/18/2023 18:45 8/18/2023 l8:5 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/19/2023 1:45 8/19/2023 1:5 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/19/2023 5:19 8/19/2023 6:0 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/19/2023 8:45 8/19/2023 8;5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/19/2023 '15:45 8/19/2023 15:5 N Other Known Causes )lowback
8/19/2023 22:45 8/19/2023 22'.5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/20/2023 5:19 8/20/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/20/2023 12:45 8/20/2023 12:5 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/20/2023 19:45 8/20/2023 19:5 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/21/2023 2:45 8/21/2023 2:5 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/21/2023 5:19 8/21/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:vent Category:Description of Event:
8/21/2023 9:45 8/21/2023 9:51 N Other Known Causes Slowback
8/21/2023 16.45 8/21/2023 16:51 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
8/21/2023 23.45 8/21/2023 23:.51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/22/2023 5:19 8/22/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/?2/2023 6:45 8/22/2023 6:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/22/2023 13:45 8/22/2023 '13:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/22/2023 20:45 8/22/2023 20:51 N Other Known Causes Slowback
8/23/2023 3:45 8/23/2023 3:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/23/2023 5:19 8/23/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/23/2023 10:45 8/23/2023 10:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/23/2023 17.45 8/23/2023 17:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/24/2023 0:45 8/24/2023 0:51 N Other Known Causes 3lowback
8/24/2023 5:19 8/24/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/24/2023 7:45 8/24/2023 7:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/24/2023 14:45 8/24/2023 14:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/24/2023 21:45 8/24/2023 21:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/25/2023 4:45 8/25/2023 4'.51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/2s/2023 5:19 8/2s/2023 6:01 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/2s/2023 11:45 8/25/2023 1 1:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/25/2023 18:45 8/25/2023 18:5 1 N Other Known Causes Blowback
8/26/2023 1:45 8/26/2023 1:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/26/2023 5:19 8/26/2023 6:01 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
8/26/2023 8:45 8/26/2023 8:51 N Other Known Causes ilowback
8/26/2023 15:45 8/26/2023 15:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
e/26/2023 22:45 8/26/2023 22:51 N Other Known Causes )lowback
8/27/2023 5:19 8/27/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/27/2023 9:24 8/27/2023 9.46 N QA Calibrations lecalibration
8/27/2023 12:45 8/27/2023 12:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/27/2023 19:45 8/27/2023 19:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/28/2023 2:45 8/28/2023 2:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/28/2023 5:19 8/28/2023 6:O7 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/28/2023 7:30 8/28/2023 7:42 N QA Calibrations lecalibration
8/28/2023 7:44 8/28/2023 8:01 N Monitor Equipment malfunction oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
8/28/2023 9:45 8/28/2023 9:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/29/2023 20.45 8/29/2023 20:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/30/2023 3:45 8/30/2023 3:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/30/2023 5:19 8/30/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
8/30/2023 1O.45 8/30/2023 10:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/30/2023 17:46 8/30/2023 17:5 1 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 0:46 8/31/2023 0:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
8/31/2023 5:19 8/31/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
8/31/2023 7:45 eBl/2023 7'.51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 14:45 8/31/2023 14:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
8/31/2023 21:46 8/31/2023 21:.51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9l',\/2023 4:45 9/1/2023 4:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/1/2023 5:19 9/1/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/1/2023 11:45 9/1/2023 11:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/'t/2023 18:45 9/1/2023 18:5'l N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2/2023 1:45 9/2/2023 1:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2/2023 5:19 9/2/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/2/2023 8:45 9/2/2023 8:5'l N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/2/2023 15:45 9/2/2023 15:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2/2023 22:45 9/2/2023 22:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/3/2023 5:19 9/3/2023 6:O7 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/3/2023 12:46 9/3/2023 12:51 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/3/2023 19:46 9/3/2023 19:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/4/2023 2:46 9/4/2023 2:51 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/4/2023 5:19 9/4/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
Start Date:
Start
Time:Eiid Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:Event Category:Description of Event
9/4/2023 9:46 e/4/2023 9:5'l N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/4/2023 16:46 9/4/2023 '16:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/4/2023 23:46 9/4/2023 23:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/s/2023 5:19 9/s/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/5/2023 6:46 9/5/2023 6:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/s/2023 8:18 9/s/2023 9:03 N Monitor Eouioment malfunction Loss of communication between analvzer and DAS
9/s/2023 13.46 9/s/2023 13:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/5/2023 20:46 9/s/2023 20:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/6/2023 3:46 9/6/2023 3:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/6/2023 5:19 9/6/2023 6:07 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/6/2023 10:46 9/6/2023 10:51 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/6/2023 17:46 9/6/2023 17:.52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
gfi/2023 0:46 9/7/2023 0:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9n/2023 5:19 9/7/2023 5:08 N QA Calibrations faily Validation
9/7 /2023 7:46 9n/2023 7:52 N Other Known Causes Slowback
gfi/2023 14:00 9n/2023 14:34 N Monitor Eouipment malfunction Loss of communication between analyzer and DAS
9n/2023 14:46 9/7/2023 14:.52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/7/2023 21:46 9/7/2023 21:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/8/2023 4:46 9/8/2023 4:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/8/2023 5: 19 9/8/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/8/2023 1 1:33 9/8/2023 1 1:36 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/8/2023 11:46 9/8/2023 11:.52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/8/2023 18:46 9/8/2023 18:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/9/2023 1:46 9/9/2023 1:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/9/2023 5: 19 9/9/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/9/2023 8:46 9/9/2023 8:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/9/2023 15:46 9/9/2023 15:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/9/2023 22:46 9/9/2023 22:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/10/2023 5:19 9/10/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/10/2023 12:46 9/10/2023 12:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/10/2023 19:46 9/10/2023 19:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/1',t/2023 2:46 9/11/2023 2:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/1't/2023 5:19 9/11/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/11/2023 8:57 9/11/2023 12:15 N QA Calibrations IGA/ouarterlv validation
9/11/2023 16:46 9/11/2023 16:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/11/2023 23:46 9/11/2023 23:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/12/2023 5:'19 9/12/2023 5:29 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/12/2023 5:34 9/1212023 5:M N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/12/2023 5:50 9/12/2023 6:00 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/12/2023 6:03 QI 2/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/12/2023 6'.46 9/2/2023 6:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/12/2023 13:46 qt 2/2023 13:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/12/2023 20:46 s/2/2023 20:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/13/2023 3:46 o/3/2023 3:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/13/2023 5:19 9/3/2023 5:29 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
c/3/2023 5:34 9/3/2023 5:44 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/3/2023 5:50 9/3/?023 6:00 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
o/3/2023 6:03 9/3/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
q/3/2023 10:46 9/13/2023 10:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
ot 3/2023 17:.46 9/13/2023 17:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/4/2023 O:46 9/14/2023 Q:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
q/4/2023 5:19 9/14/2023 5:29 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/14/2023 5:34 9/14/2023 5'.M N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/14/2023 5:50 9/14/2023 6:00 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/14/2023 6:03 9/14/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/14/2023 7:46 9/14/2023 7:52 N Other Known Causes )lowback
9/14/2023 1 1:38 9/14/2023 13:28 N Monitor Equipment malfunction -oss of communication between analyzer and DAS
9/14/2023 14.46 9/14/2023 14:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
Start Date:
Start
Time:End Date:
End
Time:
Out of
Control:
ll
|vent Category:Description of Event:
9/14/2023 21.46 9/14/2023 21:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/15/2023 4:46 9/15/2023 4:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/1s/2023 5:19 9/1s/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
9/1s/2023 '10:40 9/15/2023 1 0:58 N Other Known Causes Maintenance and recalibration
9/15/2023 11:46 9/15/2023 11:.52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/15/2023 18:46 9/1s/2023 I 8:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/16/2023 1:45 9116/2023 1:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/6/2023 5:19 e/16/2023 5:29 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/6/2023 5:34 9/16/2023 5:M N QA Calibrations failv Validation
at 6/2023 5:50 9/16/2023 6:00 N QA Calibrations )aily Validation
qt 6/2023 6:03 9/16/2023 5:08 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
q/6/2023 8:46 9/16/2023 8:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/16/2023 15:46 9/16/2023 15:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/16/2023 22:45 9/16/2023 22:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/'/2023 5:19 9/17/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
9//2023 12.46 9/17/2023 1Z:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9//2023 19:46 9/17/2023 19:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
ct 8/2023 2:46 9/18/2023 2:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
a/8/2023 5:19 9/18/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
q/8/2023 9:46 9/18/2023 9:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
q/8/2023 15 46 9/18/2023 15:.52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
ol 8/2023 23:46 9/18/2023 23:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/9/2023 5:19 9/19/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
9/9/2023 6:46 9/19/2023 6:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/9/2023 13:46 9/19/2023 13:.52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/9/2023 20:46 9/19/2023 20:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/20/2023 3:46 9/20/2023 3'.52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/20/2023 5:19 9/20/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
9/20/2023 '10:45 9/20/2023 10:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/20/2023 17:46 9/20/2023 17:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/21/2023 0:46 9/21/2023 O:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
e/21/2023 5:19 9/21/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/21/2023 7:46 9/21/2023 7:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/21/2023 14:46 9/21/2023 14:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/21/2023 ?1:46 9/21/2023 21:.52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/22/2023 4:46 9/22/2023 4:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/22/2023 5:19 9/22/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/22/2023 I 1:46 9/22/2023 11:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/22/2023 l8:46 9/22/2023 18:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/23/2023 1:46 9/23/2023 1:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/23/2023 5:19 9/23/2023 5:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/23/2023 8:46 9/23/2023 8:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/23/2023 i5:46 9/23/2023 15:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/23/2023 22:46 9/23/2023 22:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/24/2023 5:19 9/24/2023 5:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/24/2023 12:46 9/24/2023 12:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/24/2023 19:46 9/2412023 19.,52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2s/2023 2:46 9/2s/2023 2:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/25/2023 5:19 9/25/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/2s/2023 9:46 9/25/2023 9:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2s/2023 16:45 9/2s/2023 16:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/2s/2023 23:46 9/25/2023 23:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/26/2023 5:19 9/26/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/26/2023 6:46 9/26/2023 6:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/26/2023 13:46 9/26/2023 13:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/26/2023 20:46 9/26/2023 20:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/27/2023 3:46 9/27/2023 3:52 N Other Known Causes llowback
9/27/2023 5:19 9/27/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations )ailv Validation
9/27/2023 10:46 9/2712023 10:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/27/2023 17:46 9/27/2023 17:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/28/2023 O:46 9t28t2023 0:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/28/2023 5:19 9/28/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
9t2812023 7:46 9/28/2023 7:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/28/2023 14:46 9t28/2023 14:.52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/28/2023 21:46 9/2812023 21:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/29/2023 4:46 9129/2023 4:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/29/2023 5:19 9/29/2023 6:08 N QA Calibrations Dailv Validation
9/29/2023 11:46 9/29/2023 11:.52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/29/2023 18:46 9/29/2023 '18:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/30/2023 1:46 9t30/2023 1:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/30/2023 5:19 9/30/2023 5:08 N QA Calibrations Daily Validation
9/30/2023 8:46 9/30/2023 8:52 N Other Known Causes ]lowback
9/30/2023 15:46 9/3012023 15:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
9/30/2023 2?:46 9/30/2023 22:52 N Other Known Causes Blowback
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
FtB - 6 2024
DTVISION OF AIR OUALITY