Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDDW-2024-014394 DRILLING, CONSTRUCTION, AND TESTING OF THE GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 NORTH LOGAN, UTAH Prepared for: North Logan City 2076 North 1200 East North Logan, UT 84341 Prepared by: Bowen, Collins & Associates 154 East 14075 South Draper, Utah 84020 November 2023 Project No.: 363-20-01 DRILLING, CONSTRUCTION, AND TESTING OF THE GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 NORTH LOGAN, UTAH Prepared by: November 2023 11/7/23 GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 PERMITTING ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Utah Division of Drinking Water Approvals ............................................................................................................. 1 Utah Division of Water Rights Approvals .................................................................................................................. 1 PRODUCTION WELL DRILLING AND CONSTRUCTION .............................................................................. 1 Borehole Drilling .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Well Construction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 WELL DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Initial Development ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Pumping Development ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 PRODUCTION WELL TESTING ........................................................................................................................... 4 Step Rate Test ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Constant Rate Test .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Sand Production ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................................................ 9 FINAL WELL TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................................ 9 Video Camera Survey ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Plumbness and Alignment Testing ............................................................................................................................... 9 Well Clean-Out .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Disinfection .......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Well Head Completion ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Photographic Log ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 10 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page 1 Summary of Step Test Data for the Green Canyon Well No. 5 ............................................................. 5 2 Transmissivity Estimates for Green Canyon Well No. 5 Pump Test ................................................. 6 3 Transmissivity and Storativity for Long-Term Projections for Green Canyon Well No. 5 ...... 7 4 Estimated Pumping Rates & Associated Water Levels Up to 1 Year of Pumping ........................ 8 GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A Division of Drinking Water PER and Plan Approval Letter APPENDIX B Division of Water Rights Change Application Approval and Drill Start Card APPENDIX C Grout Seal Certification Letter APPENDIX D Production Well Geophysical Logs, Caliper Logs, and Gyroscopic Log APPENDIX E Well Driller’s Report APPENDIX F Screen and Gravel Pack Specifications APPENDIX G Well Driller’s Daily Logs APPENDIX H Pump Development Data APPENDIX I Step Rate Test Data APPENDIX J Constant Rate Test Data APPENDIX K Constant Rate Test Analysis & Aquifer Parameter Graphical Results APPENDIX L Water Quality Analytical Results APPENDIX M Wellbore Video DVD APPENDIX N Photographic Log GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 1 INTRODUCTION This report documents the drilling, construction, and testing of Green Canyon Well No. 5 (Well) for North Logan City (City). Green Canyon Well No. 5 is a new water supply well for North Logan City that was drilled and constructed to Utah public drinking water supply standards. The Green Canyon Well No. 5 is located at approximately 1899 East Green Canyon Drive in North Logan, Utah, approximately 1,020 feet north, 508 feet west of the east quarter corner of Section 24, Township 12 North, Range 1 East, SLB&M as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The well drilling began in January 2023 and the development and testing were completed in May 2023. Design plans and specifications for Green Canyon Well No. 5 were completed by Bowen Collins & Associates (BC&A) in March 2022. The plans and specifications were incorporated into bid documents prepared by BC&A. In April 2022, the City solicited bids from qualified well drilling contractors. Hydro Resources (Hydro) was awarded the work and entered into a contract with the City in September 2022 for construction of Green Canyon Well No. 5. PERMITTING Utah Division of Drinking Water Approvals In April 2022 a Preliminary Evaluation Report (PER) for the Well was prepared by BC&A and submitted to the Utah Division of Drinking Water (DDW). The PER was subsequently approved and granted by DDW in a letter dated September 26, 2022. A copy of the DDW approval letter is provided in Appendix A. In March 2022 BC&A completed well construction plans and specifications for the Well. The plans and specifications documents were submitted to the DDW Engineering Section for review and approval. Specification and plan approval for the Green Canyon Well No. 5 was granted by DDW in a letter dated September 26, 2022. A copy of the DDW approval letter is provided in Appendix A. Utah Division of Water Rights Approvals The City obtained a provisional well drilling start card from the Utah Division of Water Rights (UDWRi) and provided it directly to Hydro (Utah licensed Well Driller No. 815). The well drilling start card was issued under Non-Production Well Application 2225001M00. A copy of the State Engineer’s approval letter dated September 8, 2022 for the provisional well application along with the driller start card is included in Appendix B. PRODUCTION WELL DRILLING AND CONSTRUCTION Borehole Drilling The well location was originally staked by City personnel and Chris DeKorver of BC&A in April 2022. At the onsite pre-construction meeting with Hydro and the City in September 2022 the well location was moved approximately 20 feet southeast of the staked location due to site constraints on the drill rig setup. Well drilling activities for the Green Canyon Well No. 5 began on January 20, 2023. A 36-inch diameter borehole was drilled with a bucket auger drill rig to a depth of approximately 111 feet below ground surface (bgs) by Pete Martin Drilling. The driller reported that the alluvial material at the base of the borehole felt moderately consolidated, though was deeper than expected based on GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 2 adjacent well logs. A 28-inch diameter, 0.375-inch wall, mild steel ASTM A-53, Grade B surface casing was installed in the borehole with a sand cement grout. The surface casing was sealed in place using an average 19.0 lb/gal sand cement mix (Type II-V Portland Cement, ASTM C150). A total of 24 cubic yards of grout were used on the surface casing seal. Chris Mikell, P.G. of BC&A, a DDW authorized grout seal certifier, witnessed the grouting of the surface casing to verify proper seal placement. The grout certification report for the Well is included in Appendix C. Following installation of the surface casings, a 14 ¾-inch diameter pilot borehole was drilled with the Schramm T-130 drill rig utilizing the reverse circulation air rotary drilling method utilizing only fresh water and a tri-cone button faced bit. Chlorinated potable water obtained from a nearby North Logan fire hydrant was used to create any drilling fluids that were used. During borehole drilling, drilling fluids were pumped to a sample catcher box where cuttings samples were obtained every 5 feet for geologic logging. The drilling fluid was circulated into a shaker table mud system tank for cuttings removal before recirculation back into the borehole. During drilling the pilot hole, Hydro reported issues with borehole caving. On February 8, 2023 Hydro installed a 3 yard sand-cement slurry form 126 to 98 feet. Drilling continued February 9, 2023 and Hydro utilized bentonite drilling mud and polymer additives to keep the hole open. Competent bedrock was reached at a depth of 155 feet. Hydro elected to backfill the borehole with sand cement to avoid caving. Sand cement was placed from 155 to 110 feet on February 13, 2023. Drilling continued on February 14, 2023 at a rate of 6ft/hour. On February 17, 2023 at a depth of approximately 598 feet the borehole began to collapse near the base of the surface casing around 110 feet. A bridge occurred in the borehole between 110-115 feet. Hydro attempted to cement off the area below the surface casing by installing 2 yards of cement grout. The grout plug did not hold, and drilling was stopped. On February 27, 2023 a decision was made to utilize a dual-rotary drill rig to install a 24-inch casing into bedrock. This change to the well design was approved by the City. The 24-inch casing was installed to a depth of approximately 156 feet on March 14, 2023 by Cascade Drilling. Continuation of the pilot borehole drilled began on March 15, 2023 using an 14 ¾-inch diameter tri-cone button faced bit and a tricone button bit. The total depth of 809 feet was reached on March 17, 2023. Geophysical logging of the 14 ¾-inch pilot borehole was conducted on March 18, 2023 upon removal of the drill stem and bit from the borehole. The geophysical log suite consisted of spontaneous potential, single point resistance, 16-inch and 64-inch resistivity, neutron, and natural gamma. Information from the pilot borehole was processed on a fast turnaround and used to design the well. Drill cutting samples were not submitted for sieve analysis because the borehole below 150 feet is bedrock formation and sieve information would have provided no useful information. BC&A evaluated the geologic and geophysical logs and provided final well design recommendations to the City. After City approval of recommended well design, BC&A provided the final well design requirements to Hydro for construction of the Well. Copies of the geophysical logs are contained in Appendix D. Figure 3 provides a geologic log for the Green Canyon Well No. 5 based on the drill cutting samples and geophysical logs obtained from the well boring. Based on the geologic log and geophysical log, BC&A recommended #4 x 3/8” gradation gravel pack with 0.100-inch slot well screen was appropriate for the well design. BC&A recommended the placement of the screens based on interpretation of the geophysical logs and drillers notes on fracture zones in the bedrock formation. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 3 The water bearing zones identified and recommended for well screens were between 370 to 710 feet. A total of 240 feet of well screens were recommended. Appendix E contains a copy of the Well Driller’s Report as submitted to the UDWRi by Hydro. The 14 ¾-inch pilot borehole was reamed out by Hydro to a 22.5-inch diameter production borehole using a 22.5-inch diameter button-faced tricone reamer bit from March 30 through April 2, 2023. The production well borehole was drilled to a depth of 720 feet bgs. The total drilled depth includes a 5-foot rathole deemed necessary by Hydro to allow installation of the well casing to a depth of 715 feet bgs. Screens were placed at the depth intervals specified by BC&A and a total of 240 feet of screen was used in the well. The well screen is 304 stainless steel wire-wrap provided by Roscoe Moss Company. Well Construction An as-built well completion drawing for the Green Canyon Well No. 5 is provided in Figure 4. Well construction took place from April 2 through April 7, 2023. Mild steel, 0.375-inch wall, 16-inch diameter casing was installed in the borehole to a depth of 370 feet bgs, 400 to 420 feet, 530 to 570 feet, and from 630 to 650 feet bgs. From 370 to 400 feet bgs, 420 to 530 feet, 570 to 590 feet, 610 to 630 feet, and 650 to 710 feet bgs the well was constructed out of 304 stainless steel 16-inch diameter wire-wrap well screen. A total of 240 feet of 0.100-inch slot screen was used in constructing the Well. A 5-foot section of 0.375-inch wall mild steel casing was installed at the bottom of the well from 710 to 715 feet bgs to serve as a sump. Specifications for the well screen are located in Appendix F. Following installation of the screen and casing, disinfected (chlorinated) gravel pack was pumped progressively into the annular space between the well casing and the borehole wall from the bottom of the borehole to 160 feet bgs using tremie pipe. Gravel pack for the 0.100-inch slot screen consisted of 3/16” x 3/8” gradation gravel manufactured by Industrial Silica. A total of 32 super sacks (995 ft3) were installed between 175 to 720 feet. Specifications for the gravel pack material are located in Appendix F. A total of 18 yards of neat cement grout were installed in the annular space from 175 feet to ground surface between the 24-inch and 16-inch casing and the 24-inch and 28-inch casing. Appendix G contains copies of the Well Driller’s Daily logs during the drilling and construction of the well. WELL DEVELOPMENT Initial Development Initial well development was started on April 5, 2023 and continued through April 7, 2023. The fluid level in the well was measured at approximately 110 feet bgs prior to initiating development. The initial well development consisted of raising and lowering a mechanical swabbing tool in the screened sections of the well while airlift pumping the Well. The swabbing tool was fabricated from a 10-foot-long section of perforated pipe with rubber swabs at each end. The swabbing tool was attached to the end of the drill pipe. Airlift pumping was conducted while swabbing the well screen intervals. The airlift discharge rate was estimated at 250 to 420 gallons per minute (gpm). Discharge water from the initial development was captured in a Baker tank. The development water was allowed to settle out and clear in the tank before discharge to the ditch south of the drill site. The screened intervals of the Well were swabbed and airlifted with the drill rig for 43 hours. During development of each screen section, the discharge water became visibly clear, and no gravel GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 4 pack material or significant sand was observed in the discharge water. Initial development was completed on April 7, 2023, and Hydro commenced preparing to install the annular grout seal. Pumping Development Pump development and testing was conducted by Hydro. On May 20, 2023 a vertical turbine test pump was installed to a depth of approximately 353 feet. The test pump was a Simflow SM14HH, 5- stage, installed on 10-inch column with a 2 ½-inch tube and 1 11/16-inch shaft. The test engine was a 1,200 HP Detroit diesel. Discharge was measured using an in-line totalizing flow magmeter and an 8-inch orifice plate with manometer. A Rossum sand tester was also installed to measure sand content during pumping. The discharge pipe was 10-inch diameter and conveyed water to the adjacent ditch. Two (2) 1-inch diameter PVC sounding tubes were installed adjacent to the pump column pipe for the purpose of water level measurement. One sounding tube was used for manual water level readings. The other sounding tube was used to install an electronic pressure transducer for measurement of the water level during pumping. Pump development was initiated on May 22, 2023 and was completed on May 28, 2023. The static water level in the well was measured at 111 feet bgs at the start of development. The well was pumped and surged for a total of about 60 hours with discharge rates ranging from 700 to 2,160 gpm. The well was intermittently surged by turning the pump off and allowing the water in the pump column to cascade back into the well screen. The well was surged two to three times every 60 minutes during the pump development period. In general, the well produced 4 to 40 ppm sand for 10 to 20 minutes after surging, after which the sand content dropped to less than 5 ppm. Development pumping data is to be contained in Appendix H. At the end of pump development, the well water was clear and non-turbid, and sand production was reduced to less than 3 ppm. It should be noted that the Green Canyon Well No. 4 was operating at the time of development and showed some minor impacts in the development data. The pumping level was impacted as much as 5 feet by Well No. 4. PRODUCTION WELL TESTING Step Rate Test A step rate drawdown test was conducted on Green Canyon Well No. 5 on May 29, 2023. The well was pumped at five successively higher pumping rates while drawdown at each rate, or step, was recorded. Prior to starting the step rate test, the static water level was measured at 118.96 feet bgs. Based on the initial static water level of 111 feet bgs on May 22nd the well had not fully recovered before the start of the step test. Test plans called for the well to be pumped at rates of 1,096, 1,308, 1,520, 1,733, and 1,945 gpm. Actual pumping rates based on totalizer flow readings varied slightly from the planned rates due to the ability to control the motor speed. The actual flow for the step test were recorded at 1,034, 1,317, 1,533, 1,746, and 1,943 gpm. Pumping at each step was maintained for 2 hours. Water level was monitored using a manual water level meter and also recorded using an In-Situ Hermit, which is an electronic pressure transducer and datalogger that was placed in the well. Step rate test pumping data are contained in Appendix I. The transducer used during step rate testing had a pressure range of 300 psi (693 feet of water). The transducer was installed at 350 feet bgs and was about 240 feet below the static water. Manual water level measurements were also used for evaluating the initial step test results. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 5 Drawdown in the well during each step is shown in Figure 5. The specific capacity of the well was determined based on the average pump rate during the step and the drawdown at the end of each step. Table 1 displays the pumping rates, depth to water and associated drawdown for each step. Table 1 Summary of Step Test Data for the Green Canyon Well No. 5 Discharge (Q) (gpm) Pumping Water Level (ft) Drawdown (ft) Specific Capacity (gpm/ft) 1,034 171.2 52.2 19.8 1,317 193.3 74.3 17.7 1,533 220.3 101.4 15.1 1,746 257.0 138.0 12.6 1,943 291.3 172.4 11.3 Specific capacity estimates ranged from 11.3 gpm/ft at 1,943 gpm to 19.8 gpm/ft at 1,034 gpm. Green Canyon Well No. 5 is a high yield and moderately efficient well. The step test results indicate the specific capacity decreased with increased pumping rate. The specific capacity of the well is generally inversely proportional to the discharge rate (i.e. the higher the pumping rate, the lower the specific capacity). There is an apparent change and/or sudden decrease in the specific capacity of the Green Canyon Well No. 5 between 1,533 gpm and 1,746 gpm. The well appears to display increased drawdown for the last two steps. This suggests that the well is more efficient at 1,533 gpm versus 1,746 gpm. Constant Rate Test Following evaluation of the step rate pump test data, a pump rate of 1,950 gpm was selected for the 24-hour constant rate test. This was the maximum pump rate based on what the well can provide and not based on the test pump provided by Hydro for the project. The well was allowed to recover for 17 hours before beginning the constant rate test. The well was pumped at an average rate of 1,985 gpm for 24 hours beginning on May 30th and ending on May 31, 2023. The static water level at the beginning of the test was at 119.0 feet bgs. This static water level is slightly lower than the static water level at the start of step test and indicates the well did not fully recover and that some residual dewatering of the aquifer occurred after only 3 days of pumping. The water level in the Well was monitored using a manual water level meter and also recorded using the In-Situ Hermit. Constant rate test pumping data are contained in Appendix J. There are minor differences between the manual measurements and the transducer measurements. Manual water level measurements were used to define the initial depth to water value for the transducer. Transducer information has been used to create report figures and drawdown curves. SCADA data provided by North Logan City showed there was approximately 18 feet of drawdown in the adjacent Green Canyon Well No. 4 from the 24-hour pump test conducted on the new Well. Figure 6 depicts a semi-log plot of drawdown versus time in the Green Canyon Well No. 5 during the constant rate pump test. Water levels in the well dropped rapidly during the first minutes of pumping. After the initial drawdown, the water level continued to decline for the remainder of the test. The pump rate was relatively constant at 1,985 gpm over the 24 hours of the test. There do not appear to be significant drawdown level changes or trends in the 24-hour test data that would indicate a nearby boundary condition is present, such as an impermeable boundary. The pump in GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 6 the well was shut off after 24 hours of pumping. Recovery data was collected for approximately 6 hours, however, there was no check valve installed above the pump and therefore the recovery data is of limited use for estimating aquifer properties. The pumping water level in the Green Canyon Well No. 5 at the end of the constant rate test was about 323 feet bgs, or about 204 feet of drawdown. Using the pump rate of 1,985 gpm results in a specific capacity estimate of 9.7 gpm/ft after 24 hours of pumping. The transmissivity calculated from this specific capacity using the empirical method described by Driscoll (1986) and assuming unconfined aquifer conditions is 1,945.2 feet squared per day (ft2/day). Pump test data were used to estimate aquifer properties such as transmissivity of the water bearing zones tapped by the well. The total thickness of the aquifer zones contributing to the Well were estimated from the geologic and geophysical logs at 240 feet. In reality it is believed the highly fractured zones contributing most of the flow to the Well are much less than 240 feet. Utilizing Aquifer Test v 10.0 (Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Inc, 2020) software, methods by Cooper and Jacob (1946) and Theis (1935) were used to evaluate the transmissivity assuming confined aquifer conditions. Plots showing transmissivity evaluations are located in Appendix K. Table 2 summarizes aquifer transmissivity estimates obtained using the Green Canyon Well No. 5 pump and recovery test data. Transmissivity estimates ranged from approximately 1,945 to 2,970 ft2/day, with an average of 2,621 ft2/day. Table 2 Transmissivity Estimates for Green Canyon Well No. 5 Pump Test Analysis Method Transmissivity (ft2/day) Theis (1935) Log-log Curve Match Method 2,970 Cooper-Jacob (1946) Straight line Method 2,950 Driscoll (1986) 1,945 Average 2,621 These transmissivity values obtained for the Well are in the moderate range compared to other wells located in the North Logan area. The estimated aquifer storativity from the pump test using the Theis curve match method is 5.23E-5 (dimensionless). The estimated aquifer storativity is representative of a confined aquifer (specific yield range 10-3 to 10-6). There are no significant confining layers (clays) apparent from the geologic and geophysical logs for the Well and the aquifer is described as unconfined in the area. However, the fractured zones with the bedrock formation underlying the site may act as a confined aquifer depending on the extent of the fractures and whether they connect vertically to the water table aquifer in the alluvial fill at the site (which does not appear to be the case). The Well yield meets the original design expectations for the well site. The Theis equation was used to estimate long term pumping levels in the well after 1 week up through 1 year of continuous pumping at rates between 1,000 gpm and 1,985 gpm. During the step test, it was observed that the well displays increased drawdown at an increased rate. Because of that trend, the aquifer parameters are not consistent between rates. The step test water levels and associated pumping rates were used to define aquifer parameters for long-term operation. Transmissivity estimates and GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 7 storativity values were used for four different pumping rates operating from 1 week up through 1 year as shown in Table 3 below. Table 3 Transmissivity and Storativity for Long-Term Projections for Green Canyon Well No. 5 Flow Rate (gpm) Transmissivity (ft2/day) Storativity 1,000 6,500 1.0 E-6 1,300 5,000 1.0 E-6 1,600 5,000 1.0 E-6 1,985 2,500 1.0 E-3 The analyses indicate that adjacent North Logan City wells will be impacted (drawndown) by pumping the new well at each rate (not including each individual well simultaneously pumping at their respective rate). Table 4 summarizes the predicted drawdown values in Green Canyon Well No. 5 between 1 week and 1 year at a continuous rate. While it is unlikely North Logan City would pump the new Well continuously for 1 year, the results indicate the new Well has a high potential to impact (drawdown) other nearby wells and lower the water table in the area. The table also includes a modified pumping water level based on impacts observed from Green Canyon Well No. 4. Table 4 indicates that Green Canyon Well No. 5 is not capable of pumping sustainably at 1,985 gpm for longer than 1 week. The other rates modeled appear to be much more sustainable leaving additional available drawdown above the uppermost screen at 370 feet. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 8 Table 4 Estimated Pumping Rates & Associated Water Levels Up to 1 Year of Pumping Pumping Duration Flow Rate (gpm) SWL1 (ft) Calculated Drawdown (ft) Anticipated PWL (ft) Water Level Above Top Screen (ft) Modified Anticipated PWL2 (ft) Modified Water Level Above Top Screen (ft) 1 Week 1,985 111.8 220 331.8 38.2 341.8 28.2 1 Month 242 353.8 16.2 363.8 6.2 3 Months 255 366.8 3.2 376.8 -6.8 6 Months 265 376.8 -6.8 386.8 -16.8 9 Months 270 381.8 -11.8 391.8 -21.8 1 Year 272 383.8 -13.8 393.8 -23.8 1 Week 1,600 128 239.8 130.2 249.8 120.2 1 Month 135 246.8 123.2 256.8 113.2 3 Months 140 251.8 118.2 261.8 108.2 6 Months 145 256.8 113.2 266.8 103.2 9 Months 147 258.8 111.2 268.8 101.2 1 Year 148 259.8 110.2 269.8 100.2 1 Week 1,300 105 216.8 153.2 226.8 143.2 1 Month 110 221.8 148.2 231.8 138.2 3 Months 114 225.8 144.2 235.8 134.2 6 Months 117 228.8 141.2 238.8 131.2 9 Months 118 229.8 140.2 239.8 130.2 1 Year 120 231.8 138.2 241.8 128.2 1 Week 1,000 62 173.8 196.2 183.8 186.2 1 Month 66 177.8 192.2 187.8 182.2 3 Months 68 179.8 190.2 189.8 180.2 6 Months 70 181.8 188.2 191.8 178.2 9 Months 71 182.8 187.2 192.8 177.2 1 Year 72 183.8 186.2 193.8 176.2 1 Based on SWL measured on June 12, 2023. 2 Influence of 10-feet from adjacent Well No. 4 (assumed) SWL – Static Water Level PWL – Pumping Water Level BOLD – Below the uppermost screen at 370 feet bgs. Sand Production Sand content was monitored regularly during development of the well, and during the step and constant rate pump tests. The data indicates that well development efforts were successful in reducing sand content produced. A total of 0.9 mL or 0.33 ppm of sand was produced by the end of the constant rate test. Less than 5 ppm sand was observed after 11 minutes pumping at 1,985 gpm. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 9 Less than 1 ppm was reported after 3 hours of pumping at 1,985 gpm. There are no identified sanding problems or concerns with the well. Water Quality Water quality samples were collected from the Well during the constant rate pump test at 10:50 AM on May 31, 2023. The samples were collected by BC&A staff at a wellhead sampling port and submitted to CHEMTECH-FORD Analytical Laboratory in Salt Lake City, Utah. Samples were analyzed in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act and Utah Drinking Water Standards (see most recent version of R309-103 of the Utah Administrative Code) for inorganic parameters, volatiles, pesticides/PCBs, herbicides, carbamates, and semi-volatiles, dioxins, and radionuclides. Appendix L contains the laboratory analytical reports. A piper diagram showing the plotted water quality is included in Appendix L. The Well water is a calcium bicarbonate type water. The lab test results indicate the Well produces very good quality water. The total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of 260 mg/L is below the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 1,000 mg/L, and below the Utah Secondary drinking water standard of 500 mg/L. Other inorganic parameters analyzed, such as turbidity, chloride, color, sulfate, nitrate, arsenic, and other metals had concentrations below drinking water standards. No volatiles, semi- volatiles, pesticide/PCBs, herbicides, carbamates, or dioxins were detected in the samples taken from the well. Based on the laboratory water quality test results the Well meets all public drinking water standards and is suitable for use as a public water supply well. Bacteriological testing was not conducted on the well sample taken at the end of the pump test. At that time the Well had not been disinfected. Subsequently the Well was thoroughly disinfected in accordance with AWWA standards prior to the driller demobilizing from the site. Bacteriological testing needs to be conducted when the well is permanently equipped to obtain an operating permit from DDW as a public supply well. FINAL WELL TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION Video Camera Survey A video camera survey was performed on the well on June 12, 2023 to verify the as-built construction and integrity of the constructed well by Century Wireline Services. A DGRT 2848, full color, dual lens, 360-degree view underwater video system was used to conduct the survey. The onscreen depth counter of the video equipment measured one-tenth of a foot increments. The static water level was measured at 109.2 feet bgs at the time of the video. The video indicates the well screens are about 0.5 feet shallower than the well construction as-built provided by Hydro. This may be due to starting point of the camera run or an inaccurate counter on the camera. The Well appeared in good condition at the time the video was conducted, with no damaged or broken casing or screen. There appeared to be less than 2-feet of sediment in the sump at the very bottom of the well. A DVD with the Well video inspection is included in Appendix M. Plumbness and Alignment Testing Plumbness and alignment testing was conducted on the Green Canyon Well No. 5 by gyroscopic methods by Century Wireline Services on May 15, 2023 and June 12, 2023. Appendix D contains the gyro deviation logs. Two gyro logs were performed due to the first log showing the well is beyond the allowable drift for plumbness to the top screen at 370 feet. The allowable drift for a 16-inch diameter well is 3.13 feet to a depth of 370 feet. The gyro on May 15th showed the drift at 5.0 feet, or 1.87 feet beyond the allowable distance. The gyro on June 12th showed a drift of 4.8 feet, or 1.67 feet beyond the allowable distance. Based on standards outlined in AWWA A100-06, the well is not GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 10 within acceptable limits with respect to plumbness and alignment to a depth of 370 feet (top screen), or below. The recommended pump setting is either 370 feet or in the blank section between 400-420 feet, both of which are beyond the AWWA specification for plumbness. In addition to the gyro log, the well was checked for dog-legs by lowering a 40 foot dummy pipe, with rigid spindles with a diameter of 14 ¼-inches that helps maintain the alignment of the axes of the rings. The dummy was run into the well on May 11, 2023 prior to the installation of the test pump. The dummy was able to pass freely to the top screen at 370 feet and to the total depth of 715 feet. Well Clean-Out The Well was cleaned out using a sand pump bailer on June 4, 2023 over a 2 hour period. The video log confirmed that there was less than two feet of sediment present in the sump and the clean out was complete. Disinfection The Well was disinfected on June 4, 2023 by injecting a total of 10 gallons of 12 percent sodium hypochlorite solution into the well via a tremie pipe. This volume and strength of sodium hypochlorite solution applied to the well exceeded the 100 ppm concentration of available chlorine throughout the casing and gravel pack volume of the well as specified in AWWA C654-13. A bailer was used to mix the chlorine in the well for 2 hours. On June 5, 2023 approximately 6,500 gallons of potable water was injected into the top of the well to push the disinfectant solution into the gravel pack. Although the well has been thoroughly disinfected in accordance with State of Utah Drinking Water Regulations we recommend it be thoroughly disinfected again when a permanent pump is installed and prior to bacteriological testing needed to obtain an operating permit from DDW. Well Head Completion The well casing extends 1.5 feet above ground surface and was capped with a welded steel cover on top of the well. The surface conductor casings end at ground surface and the annulus is filled to ground surface with neat cement grout. A vent pipe and any necessary modifications to the well casing will be constructed by the pump station contractor at a later date. Photographic Log Photographs of the well construction were taken periodically during the course of the project. A photo log was developed and is included in Appendix N. RECOMMENDATIONS Table 5 summarizes details the Green Canyon Well No. 5 construction details and aquifer properties determined from pump testing the well. The following recommendations are made regarding the Well: Green Canyon Well No.5 is a moderate yield, moderate efficiency well that meets the original design expectations. The Well produces water from fractured limestone and dolomite bedrock formations. The static water in the Well was 109.2 feet bgs in June 2023. The Well was test pumped at 1,985 gpm with a resulting drawdown of 204 feet after 24 hours. The test pumping rate was limited by the well/aquifer, and by not the pump. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 11 The Well was drilled under a UDWRi provisional start card approval. The City should evaluate the water rights it intends to assign to the new Well and obtain UDWRi approval prior to equipping the Well. Water quality of the Well meets all federal and Utah Drinking Water Quality standards. The Well water is a calcium bicarbonate type water. The TDS concentration is 260 mg/L. No analytical parameters exceeded drinking water quality standards. Water quality test results indicate the well is suitable for use as a public drinking water source. Pumping the Well at 1,600 gpm continuously for 1 year will result in an estimated pumping level of about 270 feet bgs with impacts from adjacent wells. At the 1,600 gpm pump rate, drawdown impacts at North Logan City’s nearby wells are predicted to be 30-40 feet. Pumping the well at 1,300 gpm continuously for 1 year will result in an estimated pumping level of about 242 feet bgs. At the 1,300 gpm pump rate, drawdown impacts at North Logan City’s nearby wells are predicted to be 10-20 feet. A minimum pump depth setting of 370 feet bgs is recommended for equipping the well for up to 1,600 gpm. It is also possible to set the pump at about 410 feet bgs and be in a 20-foot pump chamber to allow for maximum drawdown to the top screen. We recommend North Logan City monitor the seasonal static and pumping water levels in all its Green Canyon wells to evaluate long-term effects of pumping the new Well on the aquifer in the area. Green Canyon Well No. 5 is a new high yielding well that has the potential to overdraw the aquifer and lower regional water levels in the area. Surveyed measure point elevations and static water levels in all the City’s wells should be plotted to determine the water level surface in the area. At this time it is believed the static water level in Green Canyon Well No. 5 is very similar to Green Canyon Well No. 4, but lower than other wells in the area. The Well should be thoroughly disinfected in accordance with State of Utah Drinking Water Regulations when a permanent pump is installed and prior to incorporation of the well into the City water system. Analysis of coliform bacteria levels needs to be conducted when the permanent pump is installed to obtain an operating permit. North Logan City needs to refine the Preliminary Evaluation Report (PER) and provide a complete Drinking Water Source Protection Plan for the Well to DDW as stipulated in the approval letter. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY 12 REFERENCES Cooper, H.H. and Jacob, C.E., 1946. A Generalized Graphical Method for Evaluating Formation Constants and Summarizing Well Field History. American Geophysical Union Transactions, Vol. 27, pp. 526-534. Driscoll, G.G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells. Johnson Screens. Lambert, P.M., 1995. Numerical Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in Basin-Fill Material in Salt Lake valley, Utah. State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Technical Publication No. 110-B. Theis, C.V., 1935. The Relation Between the Lowering of the Piezometric Surface and the Rate and Duration of Discharge of a Well Using Groundwater Storage. American Geophysical Union Transactions, Vol. 16, pp. 519-524. Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Inc, 2020. WHI Aquifer Test for Windows, Version 10.0. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY FIGURES !( Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, IGN, and the GIS UserCommunity L E G E N D !(Green Canyon Well 5 Roads 0 2,000 4,000 Feet P:\Cache Landmark Engineering\363-20-01 North Logan New Well\GIS\Report\Figure 1 - Well Location Map.mxd cdekorver 6/27/2023 1NORTH LOGAN CITYGREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 SITE LOCATION MAP NORTH North Logan Logan Green Canyon FIGURE NO. SCALE:NORTH: Logan Canyon Well No. 5 Location Well Site !( Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community L E G E N D !(Green Canyon Well 5 Roads 0 50 100 Feet P:\Cache Landmark Engineering\363-20-01 North Logan New Well\GIS\Report\Figure 2 - Site Map.mxd cdekorver 6/27/2023 2NORTH LOGAN CITYGREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 SITE MAP NORTH G r e e n C a n y o n D r i v e FIGURE NO. SCALE:NORTH: Well No. 5 Location !( Well No. 4 Location Construction Resistivity (Ohm-m) Green Canyon Well No. 5 Well De p t h ( f e e t ) LOCATION: Latitude: Longitude: ELEVATION (GROUND SURFACE): DRILLED BY: HOLE DIAMETER:TOTAL DEPTH: LITHOLOGY LOG BY: GEOPHYSICAL LOGGER: North Logan 41.768367°-111.777280°807 5050 ft (Approx) 24" Final Hydro Resources Chris DeKorver - BC&A John Skipper - Century Geophysical 01/19/2023 0 FIGURE 3. GEOLOGIC AND WELL COMPLETION LOG Phone: 801-495-2224 Project No. Well Name: PROJECT: WATER LEVEL: Gr a p h i c L i t h o l o g y Lithologic Description Green Canyon Well No. 5 Reverse Mud Rotary 111.8 feet bgs (06/12/2023) R16 R64 CLIENT: END DATE:04/02/2023 0 Temp 00 North Logan City 363-20-01 N. Gamma (API) Neutron (POR) Single Point DRILL START DATE: Caliper (in) DRILL METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: De p t h ( f e e t ) 20 Pattern Legend Clay Sandy Clay Clay and Silt Clayey Gravel Clayey Sand Gravel Silty Sand Sand Grouted Annulus Bentonite Sand Pack Sand and Gravel Gravel and Sand Fill Grout Screen Limestone Dolomite Mudstone 2500 2500 150 -10 49 51 40 70 2500 PAGE 1 OF 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 Topsoil: TS - Silt, Clay, Sand and Gravel, Brown/Pale Brown, Limestone Gravels/Sands Cobbles and Boulders: GC - Cobbles and Gravel, Brown Matrix, Some Clay, Silt and Sand Gravel: GC - Gravel and Sand, Brown, Some Silt and Clay Clay: CL - Clay, Brown Gravel: GP - Gravel and Sand, Brown, Some Boulders and Cobbles, Some Silt and Clay, Weak Consolidation Shale: SH - Shale/Mudstone/Limestone (Bloomington Formation), Olive Brown/Tan/Grey Shale: SH/LS - Shale/Limestone (Bloomington Formation), Grey Green/Olive/Grey 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 Construction Resistivity (Ohm-m) Green Canyon Well No. 5 Well De p t h ( f e e t ) LOCATION: Latitude: Longitude: ELEVATION (GROUND SURFACE): DRILLED BY: HOLE DIAMETER:TOTAL DEPTH: LITHOLOGY LOG BY: GEOPHYSICAL LOGGER: North Logan 41.768367°-111.777280°807 5050 ft (Approx) 24" Final Hydro Resources Chris DeKorver - BC&A John Skipper - Century Geophysical 01/19/2023 0 FIGURE 3. GEOLOGIC AND WELL COMPLETION LOG Phone: 801-495-2224 Project No. Well Name: PROJECT: WATER LEVEL: Gr a p h i c L i t h o l o g y Lithologic Description Green Canyon Well No. 5 Reverse Mud Rotary 111.8 feet bgs (06/12/2023) R16 R64 CLIENT: END DATE:04/02/2023 0 Temp 00 North Logan City 363-20-01 N. Gamma (API) Neutron (POR) Single Point DRILL START DATE: Caliper (in) DRILL METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: De p t h ( f e e t ) 20 Pattern Legend Clay Sandy Clay Clay and Silt Clayey Gravel Clayey Sand Gravel Silty Sand Sand Grouted Annulus Bentonite Sand Pack Sand and Gravel Gravel and Sand Fill Grout Screen Limestone Dolomite Mudstone 2500 2500 150 -10 49 51 40 70 2500 PAGE 2 OF 3 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 Limestone: LS - Limestone and Dolomite (Nounan or Blacksmith Formation), Grey/Dark Grey/Tan, White Veins Present, Fractured 330', 440' & 510' 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 Construction Resistivity (Ohm-m) Green Canyon Well No. 5 Well De p t h ( f e e t ) LOCATION: Latitude: Longitude: ELEVATION (GROUND SURFACE): DRILLED BY: HOLE DIAMETER:TOTAL DEPTH: LITHOLOGY LOG BY: GEOPHYSICAL LOGGER: North Logan 41.768367°-111.777280°807 5050 ft (Approx) 24" Final Hydro Resources Chris DeKorver - BC&A John Skipper - Century Geophysical 01/19/2023 0 FIGURE 3. GEOLOGIC AND WELL COMPLETION LOG Phone: 801-495-2224 Project No. Well Name: PROJECT: WATER LEVEL: Gr a p h i c L i t h o l o g y Lithologic Description Green Canyon Well No. 5 Reverse Mud Rotary 111.8 feet bgs (06/12/2023) R16 R64 CLIENT: END DATE:04/02/2023 0 Temp 00 North Logan City 363-20-01 N. Gamma (API) Neutron (POR) Single Point DRILL START DATE: Caliper (in) DRILL METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: De p t h ( f e e t ) 20 Pattern Legend Clay Sandy Clay Clay and Silt Clayey Gravel Clayey Sand Gravel Silty Sand Sand Grouted Annulus Bentonite Sand Pack Sand and Gravel Gravel and Sand Fill Grout Screen Limestone Dolomite Mudstone 2500 2500 150 -10 49 51 40 70 2500 PAGE 3 OF 3 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 NTS Top Bottom Length (ft bgs)(ft bgs)(ft) Blank +3 370 373 Screen 370 400 30 Blank 400 420 20 Screen 420 530 110 Blank 530 570 40 Screen 570 590 20 Blank 590 610 20 Screen 610 630 20 Blank 630 650 20 Screen 650 710 60 Blank 710 715 5 Type Top Bottom Length (ft bgs)(ft bgs)(ft) Grout 0 160 160 #60 Sand 160 165 5 Bentonite Chips 165 170 5 #60 Sand 170 175 5 3/8 x #4 Gravel Pack 175 720 545 Total Depth 715 bgs Total Screen 240 Total Blank 478 Notes: A -3 referenced in tables above refers to 3 feet above ground level upon completion Screen -Roscoe Moss 304-SS continuous slot wire wrap with 0.100 inch slot (100 slot) Gravel Pack - 3/8" x #4 Industrial Silica Sand Figure 4 Green Canyon Well No. 5 As-Built North Logan City Green Canyon Well No. 5 - TD = 715 ft Type Gravel Pack/Grout Schedule 710' Conductor Casing 28-inch 11 3 ' 47 ' 21 0 ' 5' 16" Dia Blank Steel Casing 0.375-inch Wall (See Notes) 16" Dia x 100-Slot Stainless Steel Wire Wrap Well Screen (see table) 22.5" dia. hole 3/8 x #4 gradation gravel pack (175'-720') Neat Cement grout seal (0' to 113' and 0' to 160') # 60 Sand (5') Bentonite seal (5') #60 Sand (5') 111' (6/12/23) Approx. 36" min dia. hole 160' 71 5 ' 16" Dia x 100-Slot Stainless Steel Wire Wrap Well Screen (see table) 370' 3/8 x #4 gradation gravel pack (175'-720') 16" Dia x 5' Sump with bottom cap/plate 5' 715'720' 400' 420' 530' 570' 590' 610' 630' 650' 16" Dia x 100-Slot Stainless Steel Wire Wrap Well Screen (see table) Approx. 22.5" min dia. hole (156' to 720') Sand Cement grout seal 16" Dia Blank Steel Casing 0.375-inch Wall (See Notes) 22.5" dia. hole 809'Pilot borehole - Fill Material 30 ' 20 ' 11 0 ' 40 ' 20 ' 20 ' 20 ' 20 ' 60 ' 24-inch Surface Casing (0' to 156') (Installed w/ DR Rig) Approx. 3 feet stick-up 89 ' 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 Pu m p i n g W a t e r L e v e l ( f t b g s ) Elapsed Time (min) Figure 5 - Green Canyon Well No. 5 Step Test - May 29, 2023 Step Test SWL = 118.96 (May 29, 2023)Step 1: 1,034 gpm DD: 52.2 ft SC: 19.8 gpm/ft Step 2: 1,317 gpm DD: 74.3 ft SC: 17.7 gpm/ft Step 3: 1,533 gpm DD: 101.4 ft SC: 15.1 gpm/ft Step 4: 1,746 gpm DD: 138.0 ft SC: 12.6 gpm/ft Step 5: 1,943 gpm DD: 172.4 ft SC: 11.3 gpm/ft 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Pu m p i n g W a t e r L e v e l ( f t b g s ) Elapsed Time (minutes) Figure 6 - Constant Rate Test (1,985 gpm) May 30 - 31, 2023 24-Hr Test SWL: 111.67 ft (May 22, 2023) Top Screen: 370 feet bgs End of Constant GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY TABLES Surface Casing Depth 113 feet Surface Casing Diameter/Type 28-inch/steel Intermediate Surface Casing Depth 158 feet Intermediate Surface Casing Diameter/Type 24-inch/steel Pilot Hole Boring Depth/Diameter 809 feet/14 3/4-inch Total Boring Depth/Diameter 720 feet/22.5-inch Total Well Depth 715 feet Screen/Casing Diameter 16-inch Casing Type Mild Steel 0.375" Casing Screen Type Roscoe Moss 304 SS Wire-Wrap Screen Slot Size 0.100 inch (100-slot) Total Screen Length 240 feet Screen Intervals 370 to 400 feet 420 to 530 feet 570 to 590 feet 610 to 630 feet 650 to 710 feet Gravel Pack Grade/Type Industrial Silica Sand (#4 x 3/8") Gravel Pack Depth Interval 175 to 720 feet Fine Sand/Bentonite Seal 160 to 175 feet Neat Cement Grout Seal Intervals 0 to 160 feet Well Casing 0 to 370 feet 400 to 420 feet 530 to 570 feet 590 to 610 feet 630 to 650 feet 710 to 715 feet (sump) Gravel Feed Tube Depth/Diameter None Water Level Sounding Pipe Depth/Diameter None Static Water Level (bgs)109.2 feet (06/12/2023) Specific Capacity (after 2 hours pumping) Specific Capacity (after 24 hours pumping) Transmissivity Range 1,945 to 2,970 ft2/day Pumping Rate 1,600 gpm (~3.6 cfs) Dynamic Pumping Water Level (1 YR)270 feet bgs Dynamic Pumping Water Level (6 Mo)267 feet bgs Pump Intake Placement 360-370 feet bgs Recommended Production Well Settings Table 5 Green Canyon Well No. 5 Project Summary Information 11.3 gpm/ft at 1,943 gpm 9.7 gpm/ft at 1,985 gpm Production Well Construction Details Aquifer Properties GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDICES GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX A APPENDIX A Division of Drinking Water PER and Plan Approval Letter 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830 Telephone (801) 536-4200 • Fax (801-536-4211 • T.D.D. (801) 903-3978 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper State of Utah SPENCER J. COX Governor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor Department of Environmental Quality Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER Tim Davis Director September 26, 2022 Zachary Root North Logan City 2076 North 1200 East North Logan, Utah 84341 Subject: Plan Approval, Well Drilling, Green Canyon Well 5 (WS010) and Exception to R309-600- 13(2)(b)(ii); North Logan City, System #03015, File #12963 Dear Zachary Root: The Division of Drinking Water (the Division) received the plans and specifications for the proposed Green Canyon Well 5 Drilling from your consultant, Chris DeKorver, P.G. of Bowen and Collins on April 1, 2022. The well drilling start card was sent in by Lance Anderson of Cache Landmark Engineering on September 13, 2022. We understand that this project consists of drilling, completion, and testing of a new drinking water well (Green Canyon Well 5). The Green Canyon Well 5 is identified as WS010 in the Division’s database. The installation will occur within North Logan and be in the same general area as the rest of the Green Canyon Wells. This well will feed into the existing North Logan City distribution system. For the well drilling, a 34-inch diameter hole will be drilled for a 28-inch diameter surface conductor casing. The 28-inch surface conductor casing will be extended to 100 feet below ground surface (BGS). A 24-inch diameter hole will be drilled for the 16-inch diameter steel production casing. The production casing will extend to an estimated 800 feet BGS. Both casings will be grouted in place to 100 feet BGS. We have received the following information for the Green Canyon Well 5 (WS010): 1. Plans and specifications for borehole and well drilling. 2. Preliminary Evaluation Report. 3. Valid Start Card from the Division of Water Rights. We have completed our review of the specifications prepared by Chris DeKorver, P.G. of Bowen and Collins dated March 3, 2022, and found they basically comply with the applicable portions of Utah’s Administrative Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems. On this basis, the plans for drilling of Green Canyon Well 5 (WS010) are hereby approved. This approval pertains to well drilling, development, Zachary Root Page 2 of 3 September 26, 2022 aquifer testing, and disinfection of Green Canyon Well 5 only. Please be aware that discharge permits may be required by the Utah Division of Water Quality for discharges generated during well drilling and aquifer drawdown testing. The Utah Division of Water Rights (State Engineer’s Office) regulates the drilling of water wells. Please be aware that, for public drinking water supply wells, in addition to the Division of Drinking Water’s R309-515 rule, the Division of Water Rights’ rule R655-4 also applies and shall be followed. After drilling is completed, you are required to submit additional information outlined in R309-515- 6(5)(b) and (c) for review and obtain approval from the Director for equipping this well and constructing discharge piping and infrastructure necessary for introducing the well water into the distribution system. After obtaining the well-equipping approval, you’ll then be required to obtain an Operating Permit before the Green Canyon Well 5 (WS010) may be put in service. A checklist outlining the well approval process, including the items required for well equipping and an Operating Permit, is enclosed for your information. Please label the well water sample collected for new source chemical analysis with your water system number UTAH03015 and WS010 (for both the facility ID and sample point ID) on all laboratory forms for each individual source. This will ensure proper identification and entry of the new source chemical analysis results in our database. Approvals or permits from the local authority or county may be necessary before beginning construction of this project. As the project proceeds, a notice of any changes in the approved design, as well as any change affecting the quantity or quality of the delivered water, must be submitted to the Division. We may also conduct interim and final inspections of this project. Please notify us when actual construction begins so that these inspections can be scheduled. This approval must be renewed if construction has not begun or if substantial materials have not been ordered within one year of the date of this letter. Concurrence – Preliminary Evaluation Report The Division received the Preliminary Evaluation Report (PER) for the North Logan Green Canyon Well 5 from your consultant, Christopher DeKorver, PG and Bowen Collins & Associates on April 1, and an exception to rule R309-600-13(2)(b)(ii) submitted April 21, 2022. The Division concurs with this report. This PER must be refined, and a complete Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) Plan is submitted within one (1) year of the date of this letter. Refer to R309-600-13(6) and R309-600-7(1). You must submit proof that the delineation has been submitted to North Logan City to be covered under the North Logan City Drinking Water Source Protection Ordinance before the well can receive an operating permit. The exception request to Rule R309-600-13(2)(b)(ii) has been received by the Division. The exception to the rule has been submitted because one septic system, a pollution source, has been documented in zone two of an unprotected aquifer. The following items have been submitted to support the exception request:  A Drinking Water Source Protection Ordinance has been adopted by North Logan City in March 2022. Zachary Root Page 3 of 3 September 26, 2022  A Land Use Agreement (LUA) has been obtained with Paul Israelsen stating that they will not allow or locate any uncontrolled pollution sources on their property, Parcel No 05-004-0007.  The Nitrate monitoring for the Green Canyon Well No 1, 2, 3 & 4 show no increase in Nitrate results since monitoring began, as early as 1993 for Well No 1. This will continue to be monitored as yearly Nitrate samples are reported. o The septic system was documented as being present in the original DWSP plan for Green Canyon Well No. 1 & 2 (concurred with in 2000) and therefore, all monitoring of these sources has included the possible contamination by the pollution source. o No additional uncontrolled PCS or pollution sources will be allowed in the area as North Logan City has adopted a Source Protection Ordinance and LUA have been recorded with Cache County. The exception request to Rule R309-600-13(2)(b)(ii) has been granted by the Division. Please contact Melissa Noble at (385) 271-7043 or at mnoble@utah.gov if you have questions or concerns about the review of your Preliminary Evaluation Report. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Dani Zebelean, of this office, at (385) 278-5110, or me at (385) 515-1464. Sincerely, Nathan Lunstad, P.E. Assistant Director DZ/MNN/mrn/mdb Enclosure — Well Approval Checklist cc: Ben Harker, Bear River Health Department, bharker@brhd.org Lance Anderson, Cache Landmark Engineering, lance@cachelandmark.com Chris DeKorver, Bowen and Collins, cdekorver@bowencollins.com Zachary Root, North Logan City, zac@northlogancity.com Dani Zebelean, Division of Drinking Water, dzebelean@utah.gov Cameron Draney, Division of Drinking Water, cdraney@utah.gov Hunter Payne, Division of Drinking Water, hnpayne@utah.gov Melissa Noble, Division of Drinking Water, mnoble@utah.gov DDW-2022-038418  DDW-Eng-009 Page 1 of 1 Last update 4/22/2015 Division of Drinking Water Checklist for New Public Drinking Water Wells (per Utah Administrative Code, Rule R309-515-6) System Name: North Logan City System Number: 03015 Well Name & Description: Green Canyon Well 5 1. Approval to Drill the Well ☒ Project Notification Form (PNF) ☒ Preliminary Evaluation Report (PER) concurrence ☒ Well drilling specifications and plans ☒ Valid Start Card or authorization to drill letter from the Division of Water Rights 2. Approval to Equip the Well ☐ PNF (if the well drilling and well equipping are designed by different consultants) ☐ Well location data ☐ Certification of well seal ☐ Well driller’s report (well log) ☐ Aquifer drawdown test results (step drawdown test & constant-rate test) for well yield determination ☐ Chemical analyses of the well water ☐ Plans and specifications for equipping the well ☐ Pump information (e.g., pump specifications, pump curve & operating point, motor information, etc.) ☐ Well head discharge piping ☐ Well house design 3. Operating Permit to Introduce the Well Water ☐ Documentation of valid water right(s) ☐ Recorded land use agreements, or documentation that the requirements for coverage under the City/County source protection ordinance have been met ☐ Design engineer’s certification of conformance with plan approval conditions ☐ Design engineer’s certification of rule conformance for any deviation from approved plans ☐ As-built or record drawings ☐ Evidence of O&M manual delivery to system owner ☐ Satisfactory bacteriological results as evidence of proper flushing and disinfection GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX B APPENDIX B Division of Water Rights Change Application Approval and Drill Start Card State of Utah DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Rights SPENCER J. COX JOEL FERRY TERESA WILHELMSEN Governor Executive Director State Engineer/Division Director DEIDRE M. HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor September 8, 2022 North Logan City 2076 N 1200 E North Logan, UT 84341 Dear Applicant:RE: Test Well#: 2225001M00 EXPIRATION DATE: September 8, 2023 This letter is YOUR AUTHORIZATION to drill 1 test wells at the following location(s): (1) North 915 feet, West 510 feet from the E4 Cor, Sec 24, Town 12N , Range 1E, SLB&M. The purpose of a test well is to determine the quality and availability of an adequate water supply that may be used subsequently to support water use(s) in future applications filed with the Division of Water Rights. Even though you may proceed with the construction of the well(s), please take note that this letter DOES NOT GRANT ANY PERMISSION OR APPROVAL TO DIVERT WATER FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER, OTHER THAN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR QUALITY/QUANTITY TESTING. The well driller must have a current license with the State Engineer (if the well is to be deeper than 30 feet), and the well must be constructed in accordance with the State of Utah Administrative Rules for Water Well Drillers. Following completion and testing, the well casing must either be sealed with a tamper-resistant, water-tight cap or permanently and properly abandoned by a licensed driller (if deeper than 30 feet) before the drill rig is removed from the site. Enclosed you will find two postage-paid forms. One is the Driller (START) Card form, which you MUST give to the licensed driller with whom you contract to drill the well(s). The other is the Applicant Card form. It is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to sign and return this form to this office immediately upon well completion. Your submittal of the APPLICANT Card form will be notice to our office that the work has been completed and will begin the 30-day period in which the driller is to submit a report as required herein. The driller cannot legally commence drilling the test well(s) until you provide him with the Driller (START) card form, which will then be submitted to our office for verification. You should review the contents of this approval letter with the driller to be certain that the instructions and conditions are thoroughly understood by all parties. NOTE: Please be aware that your permission to proceed with the drilling under this authorization expires on September 8, 2023. Sincerely, William H. Atkin, P.E., Regional Engineer - Logan WA:sn 1594 West North Temple, Suite 220, PO Box 146300, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6300 telephone (801) 538-7240 - facsimile (801) 538-7467 - www.waterrights.utah.gov SCANNED GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX C APPENDIX C Grout Seal Certification Letter 154 EAST 14075 SOUTH • DRAPER, UTAH 84020 TEL: (801) 495-2224 • FAX: (801) 495-2225 March 31, 2023 Tim Davis, P.E. Director, Utah Division of Drinking Water P.O. Box 144830 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830 Sent via email timdavis@utah.gov Subject: Well Seal Certification for North Logan City Green Canyon Well No. 5 Located near North Logan in Cache County Dear Mr. Davis: On January 20, 2023, I witnessed the sealing procedure for the surface conductor casing portion of the well referenced above as authorized by R309-515-6(5)(b). This letter is to certify that the well sealing procedure met the requirements of Utah Administrative Code (UAC), Rule R309-515-6(6)(i), Well Sealing Techniques and Requirements, and Rule R655-4-11.4, Surface Seals and Interval Seals. Well Background Well Name: Green Canyon Well No. 5 Water Right Number: 2225001M00 (temporary drilling approval) Well Owner Name: North Logan City Well Type: Public Drinking Water Well Public Water System Name: North Logan PWS Number: 03015 Water Source ID (if applicable): WS010 DDW File Number (if applicable): #12963 Consultant Name and Company: Christopher DeKorver, P.G., Bowen Collins & Associates Well Location County: Cache Nearest Town: North Logan Location listed on the Start Card: North 915 feet, West 510 feet from the E4 corner of Section 24, , Township 12N, Range 1E, SL B&M Local Health Department: Bear River Health Department Street Address: approx. 2300 Green Canyon Road Latitude/Longitude: North 41.768374°, West 111.777300° Mr. Tim Davis March 31, 2023 Page 2 Method Used to Determine Latitude & Longitude: iPhone GPS app (GPS Tour v2.3.1) (+/- 40 feet) Datum: NAD83 Ground Surface Elevation: approximately 5050 feet MSL Method Used to Determine Elevation: estimated off Google Earth Well Driller Name of Licensed Well Driller: Jim Hale License Number: 815 Company Representative’s Name: Kollin Mellott Company Name: Hydro Resources Mailing Address: 13027 CR 18, Unit C, Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Phone Number: 303-857-7540 Responsible driller/operator onsite during well sealing: Kollin Mollett, Registered Operator OR739 Well Construction Well Drilling Method: A 36-inch diameter borehole was drilled by Pete Martin Drilling using bucket auger drilling methods to a depth of 111 feet below ground surface (bgs). A 28- inch diameter mild steel casing was installed in the borehole to a depth of 111 feet bgs. The remaining portions of the well had not been drilled or constructed yet. The annulus between the 28-inch surface casing and 36-inch borehole was filled with sand cement grout by Pete Martin Drilling. The description of the sealing procedures on the 28-inch diameter surface casing I witnessed is provided below. Casing Types Installed: Production Well Casing Materials: 28-inch diameter, Mild Steel ASTM A-53, Grade B, 0.375-inch wall, to a depth of 111 feet. Annulus Size (between borehole and casing): Surface Casing to borehole, 4-inches Pitless Adapter: not planned. Well Sealing Description 28-inch Surface Well Casing Description of the Well Sealing Process: On January 20, 2023 I witnessed the installation of the annular seal between the 28-inch surface well casing and the 36-inch borehole from 111 feet to ground surface. The annulus was sealed via a tremie pipe placed down to 100 feet with 24 cubic yards of truck delivered Type II-V Portland Cement sand cement slurry conforming to ASTM C150 Standards and hydrated to an average weight of 19.0 lbs/gal. The sand cement grout was provided by Kilgore Companies (via 3 trucks) and pumped down the tremie pipe. The grout was pumped by Pete Martin Drilling. The volume of grout installed exceeded the theoretical requirement by about 100% indicating washouts and grout penetration into the formation. Grout Material: Sand cement grout, Portland Cement Type II-V Mr. Tim Davis March 31, 2023 Page 3 Grout Volume (in cu. yds.): 24 cubic yards for the certified seal from 111 feet below ground surface up to ground surface. Grout volume was more than the theoretical volume required. Grout Density (in lbs/gal): 18.9 lbs/gal. (Truck #1, 19.0 lbs/gal, 9 cubic yards; Truck #2, 18.9 lbs/gal, 9.0 cubic yards; Truck #3, 19.0 lbs/gal, 6 cubic yards ). Method of Placement: Pumped via tremie pipe Depth from Surface (in feet): 111 feet Did Grout Come to the Surface? Yes Length of tremie pipe: 110 feet Names & Affiliations of Other Observers Chance Beacham/Pete Martin Drilling and other drill crew members, names unknown Issues Observed during Well Sealing None. This well seal certification is not a Plan Approval to construct a public drinking water well or an Operating Permit to use the well as a public drinking water source. Such approval may only be granted by the Director of the Division of Drinking Water. A copy of this letter has been sent to the Division of Drinking Water. If you have any questions regarding this certification, please contact me at (801) 495-2224 or cmikell@bowencollins.com. Sincerely, Bowen, Collins & Associates Christopher D. Mikell, P.G. Hydrogeologist Attachments ─ Grout Witness Authorization Letter cc: Nathan Lunstad, Div. of Drinking Water, nlunstad@utah.gov Melissa Noble, Div. of Drinking Water, mnoble@utah.gov Ben Harker, Bear River Health, bharker@brhd.org Lance Andersen, Cache Landmark, lance @chachelandmark.com Christopher DeKorver, Bowen Collins & Assoc., cdekorver@bowencollins.com Zachary Root, North Logan City, zac@northlogancity.com Jim Hale, Hydro Resources, jhale@hydroresources.com Michael John Taylor, Hydro Resources, jtaylor@hydroresources.com GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX D APPENDIX D Production Well Geophysical Logs, Caliper Logs, and Gyroscopic Log Top Screen 16-inch casing is allowed 2/3 the ID every 100'. The ID of the 16-inch casing is 15.25", or 10.17"/100', or 3.13' at 370'. Top Screen 16-inch casing is allowed 2/3 the ID every 100'. The ID of the 16-inch casing is 15.25", or 10.17"/100', or 3.13' at 370'. GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX E APPENDIX E Well Driller’s Report GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX F APPENDIX F Screen and Gravel Pack Specifications Date: Outside Diameter (Inches) Length (Feet) Slot Size (Inches) Wire Width (Inches) Wire Altitude (Inches) Wire Base (Inches) Rod Diameter (Inches) Rod Count (Each) Weight per Foot (Lbs.) Weld Ring Lengths (Inches) Collapse Strength (psi) Max Setting Depth (Feet) Safe Hanging Weight (Lbs.) Yield (Lbs.) *Transmitting Capacity **Transmitting Capacity Open Area (%) Open Area (sq. in.) *GPM per Ft. of Screen @ 0.1 Ft/Sec **GPM per Ft. of Screen @ 1.5 Ft/Sec Jeremy L. Kuhn Cell: (602) 677-4266 JLK@RoscoeMoss.com The SE Head shall be made of Low Carbon Steel, and shall be shipped loose. Casing Guides- 304L Stainless Steel; C-Type Casing Guides (Centralizers) shall be manufactured in accordance with Roscoe Moss Company's standard design for Low Carbon Steel and shall be C-Type for Stainless Steel (in screen sections). Casing Guides shall be manufactured of the same material as the casing or screen they will be welded to. The Casing Guides shall have a 2" stick-off. Mill Certificates shall be provided upon request. Please submit any questions or requests for additional information to: 100,088 66.43 996.47 35.34 213.00 16" OD; Low Carbon Steel; SE Head 68 38.63 + Rings 6 x 2 282 2,320 35,031 10, 20 0.100 0.183 0.37 0.055 0.25 16" OD; 304L Stainless Steel; Continuous Wire Wrap Screen 16 March 21, 2023 Project: Green Canyon Well 5- N. Logan UT Roscoe Moss Company 4360 Worth Street Los Angeles, CA 90063, U.S.A. Phone: (323) 263-4111; Fax: (323) 263-4497 Web Site: www.RoscoeMoss.com Well Material Submittal ItemE; PRODUCT:#3/8 DATE:9/23/2022 OPENING OPENING STANDARD %%% MICRON INCHES SIEVE WEIGHT RETAINED PASSED Individual SPEC.OTHER 37500 1.5 1 1/2" 25000 1 1" 19000 0.75 3/4" 16000 0.625 5/8" 12500 0.5 1/2" 9500 0.375 3/8"0 0.0%100.0%0.0% 6300 0.25 1/4"170.9 50.0%50.0%50.0% 4750 0.187 #4 317.8 93.0%7.0%43.0% 4000 0.157 #5 3350 0.132 #6 2800 0.11 #7 2360 0.0937 #8 2000 0.0787 #10 1700 0.0661 #12 1400 0.0555 #14 1180 0.0469 #16 1000 0.0394 #18 850 0.0331 #20 710 0.0278 #25 600 0.0234 #30 500 0.0197 #35 425 0.0165 #40 355 0.0139 #45 300 0.0117 #50 250 0.0098 #60 212 0.0083 #70 180 0.007 #80 150 0.0059 #100 125 0.0049 #120 106 0.0041 #140 75 0.0029 #200 PAN PAN PAN 341.7 100.0%0.0%7.0% COMMENTS: GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX G APPENDIX G Well Driller’s Daily Logs GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX H APPENDIX H Pump Development Data GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX I APPENDIX I Step Rate Test Data GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX J APPENDIX J Constant Rate Test Data GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX K Appendix K Constant Rate Test Analysis & Aquifer Parameter Graphical Results Location: Pumping Test: 24-Hr Test Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Hydro Test Date: 5/31/2023 Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] Observation Well: Well 1 Static Water Level [ft]: 119.00 Radial Distance to PW [ft]: - Pumping Test - Water Level Data Page 1 of 2 Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Time [min] Water Level [ft] Drawdown [ft] 1 0 119.00 0.00 2 1 225.81 106.81 3 2 248.48 129.48 4 3 259.17 140.17 5 4 264.54 145.54 6 5 266.69 147.69 7 6 267.09 148.09 8 7 268.07 149.07 9 8 269.36 150.36 10 9 270.22 151.22 11 10 270.93 151.93 12 11 271.75 152.75 13 12 272.47 153.47 14 13 273.63 154.63 15 14 273.88 154.88 16 15 274.30 155.30 17 20 275.29 156.29 18 25 277.35 158.35 19 30 278.47 159.47 20 35 279.58 160.58 21 40 279.95 160.95 22 45 280.53 161.53 23 50 281.31 162.31 24 55 282.32 163.32 25 60 282.71 163.71 26 90 286.59 167.59 27 120 289.05 170.05 28 150 291.13 172.13 29 180 294.05 175.05 30 210 294.92 175.92 31 240 296.23 177.23 32 270 297.44 178.44 33 300 298.26 179.26 34 360 300.47 181.47 35 420 303.45 184.45 36 480 304.27 185.27 37 540 305.90 186.90 38 600 305.80 186.80 39 660 311.29 192.29 40 720 310.87 191.87 41 780 311.65 192.65 42 840 312.68 193.68 43 900 316.34 197.34 44 960 316.73 197.73 45 1020 317.43 198.43 46 1080 318.98 199.98 47 1140 318.38 199.38 48 1200 319.71 200.71 Pumping Test - Water Level Data Page 2 of 2 Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Time[min]Water Level[ft]Drawdown[ft] 49 1260 321.15 202.15 50 1320 322.41 203.41 51 1380 322.82 203.82 52 1440 323.16 204.16 Pumping Test Analysis Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 24-Hr Test Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Hydro Test Date: 5/31/2023 Analysis Performed by: Analysis Date: 5/31/2023Time v DD Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 288 576 864 1152 1440 Time [min] 0.00 40.00 80.00 120.00 160.00 200.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Pumping Test Analysis Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 24-Hr Test Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Hydro Test Date: 5/31/2023 Analysis Performed by: Analysis Date: 5/31/2023Theis Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 1E-5 1E-4 1E-3 1E-2 1E-1 1E0 1E1 1E2 1E3 1E4 1E5 1E6 1E7 1E8 1E9 Dimensionless Time tD 1E-5 1E-4 1E-3 1E-2 1E-1 1E0 1E1 1E2 Di m e n s i o n l e s s D r a w d o w n s D Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.97 × 103 1.24 × 101 5.23 × 10-5 0.66 Pumping Test Analysis Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 24-Hr Test Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Hydro Test Date: 5/31/2023 Analysis Performed by: Analysis Date: 5/31/2023Cooper Jacob Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 1E0 1E1 1E2 1E3 1E4 Time [min] 0.00 60.00 120.00 180.00 240.00 300.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using COOPER & JACOB Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.95 × 103 1.23 × 101 5.67 × 10-5 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1985 gpm prediction - 24hr Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 5/31/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 5/31/20231985 gpm - Prediction 24-Hr Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Time [d] 0.00 40.80 81.60 122.40 163.20 204.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.50 × 103 1.04 × 101 1.00 × 10-3 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1985 gpm prediction - 24hr Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 5/31/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/13/20231985 gpm - 1 Week Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time [d] 0.00 44.00 88.00 132.00 176.00 220.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.50 × 103 1.04 × 101 1.00 × 10-3 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1985 gpm prediction - 24hr Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 5/31/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231985 gpm - 1 Month Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 6 12 18 24 30 Time [d] 0.00 48.40 96.80 145.20 193.60 242.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.50 × 103 1.04 × 101 1.00 × 10-3 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1985 gpm prediction - 24hr Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 5/31/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231985 gpm - 3 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 18 36 54 72 90 Time [d] 0.00 51.00 102.00 153.00 204.00 255.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.50 × 103 1.04 × 101 1.00 × 10-3 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1985 gpm prediction - 24hr Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 5/31/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231985 gpm - 6 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 36.4 72.8 109.2 145.6 182 Time [d] 0.00 53.00 106.00 159.00 212.00 265.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.50 × 103 1.04 × 101 1.00 × 10-3 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1985 gpm prediction - 24hr Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 5/31/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231985 gpm - 9 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 54 108 162 216 270 Time [d] 0.00 54.00 108.00 162.00 216.00 270.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.50 × 103 1.04 × 101 1.00 × 10-3 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1985 gpm prediction - 24hr Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 5/31/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231985 gpm - 1 Year Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1985 [U.S. gal/min] 0 73 146 219 292 365 Time [d] 0.00 54.40 108.80 163.20 217.60 272.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 2.50 × 103 1.04 × 101 1.00 × 10-3 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1600 gpm projection Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/12/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/13/20231600 gpm - 1 Week Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1600 [U.S. gal/min] 0 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7 Time [d] 0.00 25.60 51.20 76.80 102.40 128.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1600 gpm projection Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/12/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231600 gpm - 1 Month Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1600 [U.S. gal/min] 0 6 12 18 24 30 Time [d] 0.00 27.00 54.00 81.00 108.00 135.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1600 gpm projection Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/12/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231600 gpm - 3 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1600 [U.S. gal/min] 0 18 36 54 72 90 Time [d] 0.00 28.00 56.00 84.00 112.00 140.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1600 gpm projection Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/12/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231600 gpm - 6 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1600 [U.S. gal/min] 0 36.4 72.8 109.2 145.6 182 Time [d] 0.00 29.00 58.00 87.00 116.00 145.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1600 gpm projection Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/12/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231600 gpm - 9 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1600 [U.S. gal/min] 0 54 108 162 216 270 Time [d] 0.00 29.40 58.80 88.20 117.60 147.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1600 gpm projection Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/12/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231600 gpm - 1 Year Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1600 [U.S. gal/min] 0 73 146 219 292 365 Time [d] 0.00 29.60 59.20 88.80 118.40 148.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1300 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/1/20231300 gpm - 1 Week Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1300 [U.S. gal/min] 0 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7 Time [d] 0.00 21.00 42.00 63.00 84.00 105.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1300 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/1/20231300 gpm - 1 Month Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1300 [U.S. gal/min] 0 6 12 18 24 30 Time [d] 0.00 22.00 44.00 66.00 88.00 110.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1300 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/1/20231300 gpm - 3 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1300 [U.S. gal/min] 0 18 36 54 72 90 Time [d] 0.00 22.80 45.60 68.40 91.20 114.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1300 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/1/20231300 gpm - 6 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1300 [U.S. gal/min] 0 36.4 72.8 109.2 145.6 182 Time [d] 0.00 23.40 46.80 70.20 93.60 117.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1300 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231300 gpm - 9 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1300 [U.S. gal/min] 0 54 108 162 216 270 Time [d] 0.00 23.60 47.20 70.80 94.40 118.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1300 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231300 gpm - 1 Year Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1300 [U.S. gal/min] 0 73 146 219 292 365 Time [d] 0.00 24.00 48.00 72.00 96.00 120.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 5.00 × 103 2.08 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1000 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/1/20231000 gpm - 1 Week Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1000 [U.S. gal/min] 0 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7 Time [d] 0.00 12.40 24.80 37.20 49.60 62.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 6.50 × 103 2.71 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1000 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231000 gpm - 1 Month Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1000 [U.S. gal/min] 0 6 12 18 24 30 Time [d] 0.00 13.20 26.40 39.60 52.80 66.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 6.50 × 103 2.71 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1000 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231000 gpm - 3 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1000 [U.S. gal/min] 0 18 36 54 72 90 Time [d] 0.00 13.60 27.20 40.80 54.40 68.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 6.50 × 103 2.71 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1000 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231000 gpm - 6 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1000 [U.S. gal/min] 0 36.4 72.8 109.2 145.6 182 Time [d] 0.00 14.00 28.00 42.00 56.00 70.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 6.50 × 103 2.71 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1000 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231000 gpm - 9 Months Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1000 [U.S. gal/min] 0 54 108 162 216 270 Time [d] 0.00 14.40 28.80 43.20 57.60 72.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 6.50 × 103 2.71 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 Pumping Test Prediction Report Project: Green Canyon Well 5 Number: Client: North Logan City Location: Pumping Test: 1000 gpm Prediction Pumping Well: Well 1 Test Conducted by: Test Date: 6/1/2023 Scenario Performed by: Scenario Date: 6/14/20231000 gpm - 1 Year Aquifer Thickness: 240.00 ft Discharge Rate: 1000 [U.S. gal/min] 0 73 146 219 292 365 Time [d] 0.00 14.40 28.80 43.20 57.60 72.00 Dr a w d o w n [ f t ] Well 1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well Transmissivity [ft²/d] Hydraulic Conductivity [ft/d] Storage coefficient Radial Distance to PW [ft] Well 1 6.50 × 103 2.71 × 101 1.00 × 10-6 0.66 GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX L APPENDIX L Water Quality Analytical Results Appendix L: Trilinear Diagram Geochemistry of Sampling of the Green Canyon Well No. 5 Na 100% HCO3100% Ca + Mg 100% SO4 + Cl 100% Na 100%Cl 100% SO4 100%Mg 100% Ca 100%HCO3 100% Na 100%HCO3 100% Mg Legend ClCa Na 100% HCO3100% Ca + Mg 100% SO4 + Cl 100% Na 100%Cl 100% SO4 100%Mg 100% Ca 100%HCO3 100% Na 100%HCO3 100% Mg Legend ClCa Final Well Sample (5/31/23) The analyses presented on this report were performed in accordance with the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) unless noted in the comments, flags, or case narrative. If the report is to be used for regulatory compliance, it should be presented in its entirety, and not be altered. Client Service Contact: 801.262.7299 Bowen-Collins Attn: Chris DeKorver 154 East 14075 South Draper, UT 84020 Work Order: 23E2528 Project: [none] 6/12/2023 Approved By: Dave Gayer, Laboratory Director 9632 South 500 West Sandy, Utah 84070 Serving the Intermountain West since 1953 801.262.7299 Main 866.792.0093 Fax www.ChemtechFord.com Page 1 of 8 xx Chemtech-Ford Laboratories Serving the Intermountain West Since 1953 Certificate of Analysis 9632 South 500 West Sandy, UT 84070 O:(801) 262-7299 F: (866) 792-0093 www.ChemtechFord.com Bowen-Collins Chris DeKorver 154 East 14075 South Draper, UT 84020 PO#: Receipt: Date Reported: Project Name: 5/31/23 14:27 @ 11.7 °C 6/12/2023 [none] Sample ID: Well 5 Lab ID: 23E2528-01Matrix: Drinking Water Flag(s)Units Analysis Date/Time Date Sampled: 5/31/23 10:50 Preparation Date/Time Sampled By: Chris DeKorver Minimum Reporting Limit MethodResult Calculations None 6/8/236/6/23Calculation0.14Langelier Index @ 22 Deg. C mg/L 6/1/236/1/231.3 SM 2340 B207Hardness, Total as CaCO3 Inorganic mg/L 5/31/235/31/231.0 SM 2320 B210Alkalinity - Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) mg/L 5/31/235/31/231.0 SM 2320 BNDAlkalinity - Carbonate (as CaCO3) mg/L 5/31/235/31/231.0 SM 2320 BNDAlkalinity - Hydroxide (as CaCO3) mg/L 5/31/235/31/231.0 SM 2320 B210Alkalinity - Total (as CaCO3) mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.20 SM 4500 NH3 HNDAmmonia as N mg/L 6/1/235/31/231.00 EPA 300.02.58Chloride Color Units 5/31/23 17:345/31/23 17:230SM 2120 B5Color umho/cm 5/31/235/31/231.00 EPA 120.1418Conductivity mg/L 6/2/236/2/230.016 SM 4500 CN-ENDCyanide, Free mg/L 6/1/235/31/230.100 EPA 300.0NDFluoride mg/L 5/31/23 15:355/31/23 15:350.08 SM 5540 CNDMBAS Surfactants mg/L 6/1/23 3:295/31/23 15:500.10 EPA 300.00.39Nitrate as N mg/L 6/1/23 3:295/31/23 15:500.10 EPA 300.0NDNitrite as N T.O.N.5/31/23 17:345/31/23 17:230SM 2150 BNDOdor pH Units SPH6/1/23 13:176/1/23 10:450.1 SM 4500 H-B7.7pH mg/L 6/1/23 13:046/1/23 11:050.01 SM 4500 P-E/FNDPhosphate, ortho as P mg/L 6/1/235/31/231.00 EPA 300.07.21Sulfate mg/L 6/1/236/1/2320SM 2540 C260Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) NTU 5/31/23 15:405/31/23 15:010.05 EPA 180.12.2Turbidity Metals mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.05 EPA 200.7NDAluminum, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0005 EPA 200.8NDAntimony, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0005 EPA 200.8NDArsenic, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.005 EPA 200.70.043Barium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.001 EPA 200.7NDBeryllium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.05 EPA 200.7NDBoron, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0002 EPA 200.8NDCadmium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.2 EPA 200.747.1Calcium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.005 EPA 200.7NDChromium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0010 EPA 200.80.0137Copper, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.02 EPA 200.70.03Iron, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0005 EPA 200.80.0020Lead, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.2 EPA 200.721.6Magnesium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.005 EPA 200.7NDManganese, Total Project Name: [none]CtF WO#: 23E2528 www.ChemtechFord.com Page 2 of 8Page 2 of 8 xx Chemtech-Ford Laboratories Serving the Intermountain West Since 1953 Certificate of Analysis 9632 South 500 West Sandy, UT 84070 O:(801) 262-7299 F: (866) 792-0093 www.ChemtechFord.com Bowen-Collins Chris DeKorver 154 East 14075 South Draper, UT 84020 PO#: Receipt: Date Reported: Project Name: 5/31/23 14:27 @ 11.7 °C 6/12/2023 [none] Sample ID: Well 5 (cont.) Lab ID: 23E2528-01Matrix: Drinking Water Flag(s)Units Analysis Date/Time Date Sampled: 5/31/23 10:50 Preparation Date/Time Sampled By: Chris DeKorver Minimum Reporting Limit MethodResult Metals (cont.) mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.00020 EPA 200.8NDMercury, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.005 EPA 200.7NDNickel, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 200.70.6Potassium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0005 EPA 200.8NDSelenium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.1 EPA 200.76.3Silica, (as SiO2) Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0005 EPA 200.8NDSilver, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 200.72.9Sodium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.0002 EPA 200.8NDThallium, Total mg/L 6/1/236/1/230.01 EPA 200.70.03Zinc, Total Carbamates ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1ND3-Hydroxycarbofuran ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1NDAldicarb ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1NDAldicarb sulfone ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1NDAldicarb sulfoxide ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1NDCarbaryl ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1NDCarbofuran ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1NDMethomyl ug/L 6/5/236/5/231EPA 531.1NDOxamyl Herbicides ug/L 6/7/236/7/230.440 EPA 515.3ND2,4,5-TP (Silvex) ug/L 6/7/236/7/230.220 EPA 515.3ND2,4-D ug/L 6/7/236/7/232.20 EPA 515.3NDDalapon ug/L 6/7/236/7/231.00 EPA 515.3NDDicamba ug/L 6/7/236/7/230.440 EPA 515.3NDDinoseb ug/L 6/7/236/7/230.088 EPA 515.3NDPentachlorophenol ug/L 6/7/236/7/230.220 EPA 515.3NDPicloram Pesticides ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.022 EPA 508.1NDEndrin ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.088 EPA 508.1NDHeptachlor ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.044 EPA 508.1NDHeptachlor epoxide ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.044 EPA 508.1NDLindane ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.22 EPA 508.1NDMethoxychlor ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.20 EPA 508.1NDPCB-1016 ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.20 EPA 508.1NDPCB-1221 ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.20 EPA 508.1NDPCB-1232 ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.50 EPA 508.1NDPCB-1242 ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.50 EPA 508.1NDPCB-1248 Project Name: [none]CtF WO#: 23E2528 www.ChemtechFord.com Page 3 of 8Page 3 of 8 xx Chemtech-Ford Laboratories Serving the Intermountain West Since 1953 Certificate of Analysis 9632 South 500 West Sandy, UT 84070 O:(801) 262-7299 F: (866) 792-0093 www.ChemtechFord.com Bowen-Collins Chris DeKorver 154 East 14075 South Draper, UT 84020 PO#: Receipt: Date Reported: Project Name: 5/31/23 14:27 @ 11.7 °C 6/12/2023 [none] Sample ID: Well 5 (cont.) Lab ID: 23E2528-01Matrix: Drinking Water Flag(s)Units Analysis Date/Time Date Sampled: 5/31/23 10:50 Preparation Date/Time Sampled By: Chris DeKorver Minimum Reporting Limit MethodResult Pesticides (cont.) ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.50 EPA 508.1NDPCB-1254 ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.50 EPA 508.1NDPCB-1260 ug/L 6/2/236/1/230.50 EPA 508.1NDPCB - Total ug/L 6/2/236/1/232.2 EPA 508.1NDToxaphene Semi-Volatile Compounds ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.44 EPA 525.2NDAlachlor ug/L 6/5/236/1/232.00 EPA 525.2NDAldrin ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.22 EPA 525.2NDAtrazine ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.04 EPA 525.2NDBenzo (a) pyrene ug/L 6/5/236/1/231.30 EPA 525.2NDBis (2-ethylhexyl) Adipate ug/L 6/5/236/1/231.30 EPA 525.2NDBis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.50 EPA 525.2NDButachlor ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.44 EPA 525.2NDalpha-Chlordane ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.44 EPA 525.2NDgamma-Chlordane ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.44 EPA 525.2NDChlordane - Total ug/L 6/5/236/1/231.00 EPA 525.2NDDieldrin ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.22 EPA 525.2NDHexachlorobenzene ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.22 EPA 525.2NDHexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.50 EPA 525.2NDMetolachlor ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.50 EPA 525.2NDMetribuzin ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.50 EPA 525.2NDPropachlor ug/L 6/5/236/1/230.15 EPA 525.2NDSimazine Volatile Organic Compounds ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,2-Dichloroethane Project Name: [none]CtF WO#: 23E2528 www.ChemtechFord.com Page 4 of 8Page 4 of 8 xx Chemtech-Ford Laboratories Serving the Intermountain West Since 1953 Certificate of Analysis 9632 South 500 West Sandy, UT 84070 O:(801) 262-7299 F: (866) 792-0093 www.ChemtechFord.com Bowen-Collins Chris DeKorver 154 East 14075 South Draper, UT 84020 PO#: Receipt: Date Reported: Project Name: 5/31/23 14:27 @ 11.7 °C 6/12/2023 [none] Sample ID: Well 5 (cont.) Lab ID: 23E2528-01Matrix: Drinking Water Flag(s)Units Analysis Date/Time Date Sampled: 5/31/23 10:50 Preparation Date/Time Sampled By: Chris DeKorver Minimum Reporting Limit MethodResult Volatile Organic Compounds (cont.) ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2ND2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2ND4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDBenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDBromobenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDBromochloromethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDBromodichloromethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDBromoform ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDBromomethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDCarbon Tetrachloride ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDChlorobenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDChloroethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDChloroform ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDChloromethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDDibromochloromethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDDibromomethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDDichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDEthyl Benzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDHexachlorobutadiene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDIsopropylbenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDMethylene Chloride ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDNaphthalene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDn-Butyl Benzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDn-Propyl Benzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDp-Isopropyltoluene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDsec-Butyl Benzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDStyrene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDtert-Butylbenzene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDTetrachloroethene Project Name: [none]CtF WO#: 23E2528 www.ChemtechFord.com Page 5 of 8Page 5 of 8 xx Chemtech-Ford Laboratories Serving the Intermountain West Since 1953 Certificate of Analysis 9632 South 500 West Sandy, UT 84070 O:(801) 262-7299 F: (866) 792-0093 www.ChemtechFord.com Bowen-Collins Chris DeKorver 154 East 14075 South Draper, UT 84020 PO#: Receipt: Date Reported: Project Name: 5/31/23 14:27 @ 11.7 °C 6/12/2023 [none] Sample ID: Well 5 (cont.) Lab ID: 23E2528-01Matrix: Drinking Water Flag(s)Units Analysis Date/Time Date Sampled: 5/31/23 10:50 Preparation Date/Time Sampled By: Chris DeKorver Minimum Reporting Limit MethodResult Volatile Organic Compounds (cont.) ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDToluene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDTrichloroethene ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.0 EPA 524.2NDTrichlorofluoromethane ug/L 6/1/236/1/230.5 EPA 524.2NDVinyl Chloride ug/L 6/1/236/1/231.5 EPA 524.2NDXylenes, total Project Name: [none]CtF WO#: 23E2528 www.ChemtechFord.com Page 6 of 8Page 6 of 8 xx Chemtech-Ford Laboratories Serving the Intermountain West Since 1953 Certificate of Analysis 9632 South 500 West Sandy, UT 84070 O:(801) 262-7299 F: (866) 792-0093 www.ChemtechFord.com Bowen-Collins Chris DeKorver 154 East 14075 South Draper, UT 84020 PO#: Receipt: Date Reported: Project Name: 5/31/23 14:27 @ 11.7 °C 6/12/2023 [none] Report Footnotes Abbreviations ND = Not detected at the corresponding Minimum Reporting Limit (MRL). 1 mg/L = one milligram per liter or 1 mg/kg = one milligram per kilogram = 1 part per million. 1 ug/L = one microgram per liter or 1 ug/kg = one microgram per kilogram = 1 part per billion. 1 ng/L = one nanogram per liter or 1 ng/kg = one nanogram per kilogram = 1 part per trillion. On calculated parameters, there may be a slight difference between summing the rounded values shown on the report vs the unrounded values used in the calculation. Flag Descriptions SPH = Sample submitted past method specified holding time. Project Name: [none]CtF WO#: 23E2528 www.ChemtechFord.com Page 7 of 8Page 7 of 8 Page 8 of 8 GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX M APPENDIX M Wellbore Video DVD GREEN CANYON WELL NO. 5 REPORT BOWEN COLLINS & ASSOCIATES NORTH LOGAN CITY APPENDIX N APPENDIX N Photographic Log Drilling and Installing Surface Casing Drill Rig Setup Grout Returns at Surface Bowen Collins & Associates North Logan City 700 East Well ProjectGreen Canyon Well No. 5 Report Pilot Hole Drilling and Logging Geophysical Logging (e-log) Pilot Hole Drill Bit (14 ¾) Bowen Collins & Associates North Logan City 700 East Well ProjectGreen Canyon Well No. 5 Report Pilot Hole Cuttings Well Construction Materials Well Screen (100-slot) Gravel Pack (3/16” x 3/8”) Bowen Collins & Associates North Logan City 700 East Well ProjectGreen Canyon Well No. 5 Report Well Casing and Screen Well Construction Screen Installation Casing Installation Bowen Collins & Associates North Logan City 700 East Well ProjectGreen Canyon Well No. 5 Report Gravel Installation Rig Development Development Water into Frac-Tank Bowen Collins & Associates North Logan City 700 East Well ProjectGreen Canyon Well No. 5 Report Swab Tool Clarity after Swab Development Pump Development Orifice and pitot tube setupWellhead setup Initial Discharge Color (May 22nd) Bowen Collins & Associates North Logan City 700 East Well ProjectGreen Canyon Well No. 5 Report Development Progress (May 23rd) Development Progress (May 25th)Development Progress (May 28th) Video/Gyro and Well Capping Bowen Collins & Associates North Logan City 700 East Well ProjectGreen Canyon Well No. 5 Report Video Camera Survey (June 12th) Gyro Log (June 12th)Capped Well Head