HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2024-012960I
I
WASATCH EM/IRONMENTAL, INC.
EN VIRONME N TA L SP E C IA L IS TS
WASATCH GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SO ILS A N D F OUNDATD N EN G INEERS
I
I
{
-l
Mr. PaulCallister
Premium OilCompany
2005 South 300 West
Salt lake City, Utah 84115
July 9, 1992
1093-4.Sr
John Rabideau
Senior Geologist
SUBJECT Site Characterization/l nitial Subsurface I nvestigation Report
UST Release Site EGUP
Facility ldentification Number 2000222
Gash Saver Station
Richfield, Utah
ln accordance with your reguest, we have completed this lnitial Site Characterization/Subsurface
lnvestigation Report for the Cash Saver station located at 305 South Main Street in Richfield, Utah
Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally
accepted geotechnical and environmental engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of
all other warranties either expressed or implied.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
N"-^r.il*a'r
I-l
-t
I
I
-J
Darin Worden
Project Hydrologist
DWJRl/adt
Attachments
Copies: (3)Addressee
UTAH DEPAnTil'IEFIT OF
ENVI HOilJ M f; I"ITAL AU,ALITY
v\
t,4v. 0F F.l'lvlR0rufiflrNTAL
H H-s[3ONS H Al'{ * Fr! [rt!q f DiATl0N
JUL 2 2 t$uz
J 2251 WESTCALTFORNTAAVENUE. SALTLAKEClry,UTAH84104. (aot)97244M. FAX(WA9724459
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE CHARACTERIZATION/INITIAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
UST RELEASE SITE EGUP
FACTLTTY l.D. NO. 2000222
CASH SAVER STATION
RICHFIELD, UTAH
Project No. 1093-4
To
Mr. Paul Gallister
Premium Oil Gompany
2005 South 300 West
Salt Lake Gity, Utah 841153
July 1992
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
1
I
I
-l
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter of Transmittal
Title Page
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2, SITE CHARACTERIZATION . . . .
2.1 EnvironmentalSensitivity ....
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.2
Depth to Groundwater. . .
Soil Permeability .
Precipitation
Water Rights
Facility Demographics . . .
Underground Utilities
Sensitivity Category . . . .
Required Cleanup Levels .
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
3. NATURE OF IMPACT
4. SUBSURFACE ]NVESTIGATION
4.1 Limited Soil-Gas Survey
4.2 Exploratory Soil Borings and Sampling . . .
4.3 Groundwater Monitoring Well lnstallation and Sampling
4.4 Hydropunch Groundwater Sampling
4.5 Sample Handling, Transport and Analysis
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
6. SUBSURFACECONDITIONS
6.1 Unified SoilClassification . . .
6.2 Organic Vapor Measurements
7. DISTRIBUTION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ....
7.1 Vapors
7.2 Soil .
7.3 Groundwater
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . .
Table 1 - Summary of WellCompletions and Measured Water Levels
Table 2 - Summary of Laboratory Analyses for petroleum and
Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soiland Groundwater
Figurel-AreaMap
Figure2-SiteMap
Figure 3 - Groundwater Elevation Contour Map
Appendix A - Water Rights Survey
Appendix B - BoringMell Logs
Appendix C - Laboratory Reports
1
I
I
I
I
SITE CHARACTERIZATION/INITIAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
UST RELEASE SITE EGUP
FAC|L|TY t.D. NO. 2000222
CASH SAVER STATION
RICHFIELD, UTAH
1. INTRODUCTION
A release of gasoline was suspected at the subject property following the tightness failure of one
dispenser line' Our work was undertaken in response to additional site characterization requests made
by the Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR). This report includes
information normally required in the lnitial Site Characterization Report in accordance with Federal (40
CFR 280 Subpart F) and DERR requirements.
2. SITECHARACTERIZATION
The Richfield Cash Saver property includes one building utilized as a convenience store, and restrooms.
The remainder of the site is covered with asphalt and concrete pavements. The surrounding area is
characterized and mixed residential and retail business. See Figure 1 for site location.
several other historic and existing gasoline stations are located in the immediate vicinity of the cash
saver property' The closest being a vacant 7-11 property located directly north (up gradient) of the site
across 300 South. The 7-11 USTs and dispenser island were recently removed from the site.
2.1 Environmentalsensitivity
The numerical level of environmental sensitivity for the site has been calculated according to the
December 11, 1990 DERR memorandum: "Guideline Document for Estimating Numeric Cleanup Levels
for Petroleum-contaminated Soil at Underground storage Tank Release sites.,,
A worksheet is attached as Table 3. DERR evaluates environmental sensitivity based upon
demographics, geography, hydrology, and geology. Our rationale for determining the numerical level of
each sensitivity category is presented in the following paragraphs in the order the categories appear on
the DERR worksheet.
2-1.1 Depth to Groundwater
Groundwater was measured in four site monitor wells (discussed in section 5.) between g.45 and 11.05
feet below the top of the well casing (slightly below grade). lmpacted soit comes in contact with
groundwater.
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
1
-l
I
j
-1
I
I
IJ
I.l
l
I
J
2.1.2 Soil Permeability 0- /o
Based upon soil information gathered at the site, native soils are classified as low permeability (see
Section 6.).
2.1-3 Precipitation o
Precipitation in the Richfield area averages 8.23 inches per year (National Weather Service, personal
communication).
2.1.4 Water Rights
A survey of water rights on record with the Utah Department of Natural resources (DNR) was completed
on June 2, 1992; results are included in Appendix A. There are no wells within a %-mile radius of the site.
There are however 38 wells and 2 surface water rights within a one mile radius. This includes 4 municipal
wells with the closest located approximately 1,400 feet southeast of the site. The closest surface water is
an irrigation canal located approximately 2,000 feet southeast of the site. * 1e)
2-1 .5 F acility Demographics
The facility is located within the City of Richfield, Utah; more than 3,000 people live within a three-mile
radius of the site. One residence is located directly south of the site. The residence includes one house
with a full basement. ? c>
2.1-G Underground Utilities
Several underground utilities service the site. Water and gas lines enter the property from the north. A
storm sewer parallels the property along the northern property line. Additionalwater and sewer mains
located in Main Street parallelthe property on the westem side. tt .
2.1.7 Sensitivity Category
The arithmetic surn of points for each sensitivity category indicates the site has a Level ll (Moderately
Sensitive) Environmental Sensitivity.)-,1 "ur-| ,/2.2 Required Cleanup Levels
The recommended cleanup level (RCL) for soil impacted by a gasoline release is 100 ppm total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) for Level ll sites. lf the concentrations of TPH exceed 100 ppm, the
aromatic hydrocarbon constituents of gasoline must also be measured. These constituents include:
benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and totalxylenes (BTEX). The Level ll RCLs for these constituents are
0.300 ppm, 300 ppm, 200 ppm, 3,000 ppm, respectively.
Groundwater cleanup standards are based on the state and federal maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)
for the BTEX constituents with the most stringent being 0.005 ppm for benzene.
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
2
ilG
l
I
)
I
l
-i
3. NATURE OF IMPACT
Soil and groundwater at the Richfield Cash Saver site have most likely been impacted by gasoline as it is
the only product stored on site. lnventory records do not indicate problems with the USTs or associated
pipelines. The dispenser line problem identified during the site tightness testing was repaired and
subsequently passed integrity. The area of impact identified during our subsurface investigation indicates
the most likely source of subsurface impact is tank overfill.
4. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
The subsurface investigation consisted of a limited soil-gas survey, ten exploratory soil borings, four
groundwater monitoring wells, and three vapor extraction wells. One additionalgroundwater sample was
collected from 83 utilizing a Hydropunch groundwater sampler. The soilgas survey points and drilling
locations are shown on Figure 2.
4-1 Limited Soil-Gas Survey
The soil gas survey was conducted on June 2, 1992 by inserting a tubular stainless steel probe
approximately four feet below grade and subsequently withdrawing an air sample from the soil void
space. The organic vapor content of the air sample was measured with a portable organic vapor monitor
(OVM) equipped with a photoionization detector (PlD). This instrument is calibrated to a 100 parts per
million (ppm) isobutylene standard and has a reporting range of 0.1 to 2,000 ppm. The OVM detects the
presence of volatile organic compounds including those contained in gasoline and diesel fuel. Although
the soil-gas survey is semi-quantitative in nature, it is extremely useful for the detection of soils impacted
with gasoline and other fuels. The results of the soil gas survey are presented on Figure 2. The soil gas
survey information was utilized to develop exploratory boring/groundwater monitoring well locations.
4.2 Exploratory Soil Borings and Sampling
One exploratory soil boring (83) was drilled on May 13, 1992, four borings (84-87) were drilled on June 3,
1992 and three borings (88-810) were drilled on June 23,1992 with a Mobile 8-61 truck-mounted drill rig
utilizing a hollow stem auger. Subsurface soil conditions were assessed by monitoring auger cuttings and
soilsamples collected with a split-spoon sampler in aluminum or brass liners. Cuttings and samples were
logged according to soiltype (Unified Soil Classification System), moisture content, color, organic vapor
concentrations, and the presence of odor and/or product staining; associated logs are included in
Appendix B. Select soil samples collected within close proximity of the water table, or in areas of
elevated OVM readings were submitted for laboratory chemical analysis.
4.3 Groundwater Monitoring Well lnstallation and Sampling
Groundwater monitoring wells were installed into four exploratory soil borings (85, 86, 87, and 810). The
wells were constructed of 2 and 4-inch diameter Tri-Loc schedule 40 PVC (slot size 0.01 inches.) Well
construction details are presented on the logs in Appendix B. Wellelevation and depth to groundwater
were surveyed on June 25, 1992; results are summarized in Table 1.
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
3
l
Wells 84 - 87 were developed and sampled on June 4,1992. A minimum of three well casing volumes of
water were removed from each well with disposable PVC bailers prior to sampling. The wells were then
sampled using additionaldisposable PVC bailers. Samples were collected in VOC vials with teflon lid
septa. A groundwater sample was not collected from 810. The well is initially being used to measure
vacuum differences associated with the vapor extraction wells, but will be utilized as a permanent
monitoring point for future sampling events. Well 84 was initially utilized as a groundwater monitoring
point (groundwater sample collected on June 4, 1992) and is now being utilized as vapor extraction point.
4-4 Hydropunch Groundwater Sampling
One groundwater sample was collected 83 on May 13, 1992 utilizing a Hydropunch groundwater
sampler. The Hydropunch sampler is specifically designed to sample groundwater at specific depths
and/or intervals without the permanent installation of groundwater monitoring wells. Boring 83 was drilled
to a depth slightly above the groundwater level, where the Hydropunch sampler was lowered into the
boring. The Hydropunch was then driven into the undisturbed soil below the bottom of the boring, where
the sampling screen was exposed and a groundwater sample was collected from a known depth and
geologic material.
4.5 Sample Handling, Transport and Analysis
lmmediately following collection, soil and groundwater samples were placed in cold storage and
transported under chain of custody to a state certified laboratory for analysis of TPH and BTEXN (USEPA
methods 602610 SW-846 #8020/8015). The laboratory data is summarized in Table 2 and the laboratory
reports are presented in Appendix C.
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
ln the central Sevier Valley, groundwater generally moves from south to north (Groundwater Conditions in
Utah, Spring of 1989, Cooperative lnvestigations Report No. 29).
The site monitoring wells were surveyed and depth to groundwater measured on June 25,1992.
Groundwater was encountered from 8.45 to 11.05 feet below the top of the well casings. This information
was utilized to construct a groundwater elevation contour map of the facility to determine site specific
groundwater flow direction. Based on the measured water levels, shallow groundwater beneath the site
flows in a southerly direction. (see Figure 3).
6. SUBSURFACECONDITIONS
6.1 Unified Soil Glassification
Soils encountered during drilling indicated a site stratigraphy composed predominately of fine grained
soils including: clayey silt (ML) to clay (CL), and sandy silt (ML) to silty sand (SM) to the maximum depth
explored at approximately 22.5 feet below the ground surface.
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
4
I
6-2 Organic Vapor Measurements
The soil-gas survey encountered very high vapor readings (2,000+ ppm) along the westem portion of the
south property boundary. High vapor readings were also encountered near the premium unleaded UST
located east of the site building (maximum readings of 1,400 ppm) and along the northern ploperty
boundary (maximum readings of 1,100 ppm).
Collected soil samples were screened in the field with a portable OVM. This instrument measures
organic vapors with a photoionization detector (PlD). High organic vapor readings (2,000+ ppm)were
measured on samples collected from 83, 84, 88 and, 89 at 10 feet depth. Moderate vapor readings were
encountered at 87 (125 ppm at 5 feet depth), and low readings were encountered at 85 and 86 (40 ppm
maximum at 5 feet).
7. DISTRIBUTION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
The distribution of petroleum hydrocarbons was evaluated by vapor measurements and laboratory
chemical analysis of collected groundwater samples and selected soil samples. The analytical results are
summarized in Table 2.
7 -1 Vapors
High levels of hydrocarbon vapors were detected along the western portion of the property boundary
7.2 Soil
The chemical analyses of soil samples collected at 10 feet from borings 83 and 84, located in the
southwestern portion of the property indicate 7.5 ppm and 6.0 ppm benzene, and 180 ppm and 460 ppm
TPH respectively. Analyses of the sample collected at 5 feet from 85 indicated 0.2 ppm benzene and
<2.0 ppm TPH. Samples for 86 at 10 feet and 87 at 5 feet indicated below detectable concentrations of
TPH and BTEXN.
7.3 Groundwater
The groundwater samples collected from 83, and 84 contained 9.7 ppm and 1.1 ppm benzene, and 47
ppm and 24 ppm TPH respectively. The groundwater sample from 85 contained 0.011 ppm benzene and
<0.020 ppm TPH. The groundwater samples collected from 86 and 87 contained below detectable
concentrations of TPH and BTEXN.
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of the vapor measurements and soil and groundwater chemical analyses indicate the primary
area of impact to be located in the southwestern portion of the property. Substantial organic vapor
concentrations (2,000+ ppm) and groundwaterdissolved benzene concentrations (9.7 ppm and 1.1 ppm)
were encountered in this area. Due to the extreme close proximity of the residence with a basement to
the south of the site, three vapor extraction wells were installed at the property boundary. Additional
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
5
I
"l
I
I
I
investigation is necessary to fully delineate the subsurface impacts in this area. This would include the
collection of soil and groundwater samples from the properties south of the site.
High organic vapor readings were identified along the westem and southern property boundaries.
Chemical analysis of soil and ground water samples fiom 87 located in the extreme northwestern corner
of the property did not indicate detectable TPH or BTEXN. However, w1h the southerly groundwater
gradient identified during the investigation, and the location of additional potential sources up gradient
from the site, it is possible that the northern portion of the property has been impacted by an off site
source. Further investigation in this area would be necessary to evaluate this potential.
A Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the vapor abatement along the southern property boundary is
forthcoming. Due to the relative severity and sensitivity of the impacts identified in this area. vaoor t ,n
extraction wilt be initiated prior to the deveropment of the cAp. a)/
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
b
I
I
J
J
J
J
J
.J
/^^)')
I
'1
I
"l
I
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF WELL COMPLETIONS AND
MEASURED wATER LEVELS'
lAll elevations are relative to an assumed datum of 100.00 feet at top of casing (TOC)for Bl
'Reference elevation is top of well casing.3Elevations based on water depths measured on indicated date.
WellNo.Depth
Drilled (t)
Screened
Depth (ft)
Reference
Elevation
(TOC in ft)2
Water Table Elevation3
June 25, 1992
B4 22.5 2.5-20.0 100.39 89.64
B5 22.5 2.*20.0 100.00 90.53
B6 20.a 2.*20.0 98.23 89.48
97 20.0 5.0-20.0 100.53 92.08
B8 22.5 2.*20.0 100.25 89.91
B9 22.5 2.5-20.0 100.52 89.48
810 20.0 5.0-20.0 100.65 89.60
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
1
I
I
I
1
I
I)
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
PETROLEUM AND AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL
AND GROUNDWATER
(all results in mgA or ppm)
Sample
ldentity
Date OVM
Reading TPHl
----Aromatic Hydrocarbons----
I lEthyr- lro,', lr.rapnt-
Benzene I Toluene I benzene I xytene I tralene
sorL
83@10ft.5t13t92 2,000+180 7.5 49 4.1 32 0.6
84@10ft.6t3t92 2,000+460 6.0 19 6.8 54 2.7
85@5ft.6t3t92 40 <2.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 <0.1
86@10ft,6t3t92 2 <2.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
87@sft.6t3t92 125 <2.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.'1 <0.1
GROUNDWATER
B3 5t13t92 NT 47 9.7 6,3 1.2 o.z 0.40
B4 6t4t92 NT 24 1.1 0.98 0.40 2.2 0.093
B5 6t4t92 NT <0.020 0.011 <0.002 <0.002 0.008 0.004
B6 6t4t92 NT <0.020 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.004
87 6t4t92 NT <0.020 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0,004
tTPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2< = Not Detected at given detection limit; NT = Not tested
"J
l
I
i
I
I
IJ Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
I
.J
I
..,!
Worksheet for calculation of site environme \pensitivity based upon Guideline Docunrent for Esf '\jing Numeric Cleanup Levels for Petroleum
Contaminated Soil at Underground Storage r.rnk Release Sites (12l1 1/90)
TABLE 3
EVALUATION RANKING CRITERIA AND RANKING SCORE
7. Lo,,.,ln E.-r,n Iz*,t*f;otol
SITE SPECIFIC FACTORS RANKING SCORE FINAL
DTSTANCE TO GROUNDWATER (Fr)
>100
100 to 75
75 to 50
50 to 25
25 to l0
<10, or recharge area
NATIVE SOIL PERMEABILITY
Low
Moderate
High
ANNUAL PRECTPTTATTON 0NCHES)
<10
10 to 20
>20
DTSTANCE TO NEAREST MUNtCtPAL WELL (Fr)
>5280
1320 to 5280
500 to 1320
<500
DTSTANCE TO OTHERWELLS (FT)
>1320
300 to 1320
<300
DISTANCE TO SURFACE WATER (FT)
>1 000
300 to 1000
<300
AFFECTED POPULATION
<100
100 to 3000
>3000
PRESENCE OF NEARBY UTLIry CONDUITS
Not Present
Unknown
Present
0
4
I
12
16
n Score -----2O-
0
10
n Score ------O-
0
5
10
0
I
10
15
0
5
10
Score ------Q-
Score ------8.- I O
Score ------O-
0
2
5 Score ------O-
0
t0
n
0
14
't5
Score -20.-
Score -----15-
FINAL SCORE
EVALUATION OF POINTS - ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Level I Sensitivity : >65 Points (Most Sensitive)
Level ll Sensitivity : 4O to 65 Points (Moderately Sensitive)
Level lll Sensitivity: <40 Points (Least Sensitive)
j
"l
_l
I
I
N
I
?-e60t lu^f,
'u'IcNroovnb oTuuHStu ,9'a
^gAunsTVCICOToUC 'S'n nou,{ 'Uf,AVS HSVJ 'dVI^[ CIHdVuCOd0I :I gUnCtuI
000''000'z 000'1 0
('.Lr) rrvcs s,LaD(ouddvoroHd 9s6I
I
t
i
6a\>x
at
t-'j'
//
il
II
il
ltE
,,(lo*////
r -',|
,l
r.,1
Pt)t!
slJAVrv
-F
tl
//
e
I
J
-ll
////
lt,
n
il
ltil,
,//'
.,
//
//L
Jhb
//
-7
va
-l
Irl.
t\
I
I
I
,.1! )obTE
-
tI
=_--1 NOIJVS
UJIS
I
I
lt
lt
il
il
lt
I
I
I
-l!--il-t__
-li--
lt
ll
9e
.raEy
t aio!
OTVDA
A)
I
t
I
i
///K//
Il
I
)
J\
t_2':..'I
I
L\\
\\,\\
+
I
I
I
I
L
-2//
//
\\
I
I 3OO SOI]TI{ SIREET
SIORU
DRAff
92.08
q )P ezo
SGN
DISPm'lSm
TSIAND 91.O
B1
o 90.53
o85B2
90.0
810 e83
89.48
B6e
__89.91 0_-d qBg
AUGER
CI'TIII{GS
Itu BIJILDING
LEGEND
92.oa Q Groundwater monitoring well with groundwater elevation in feet
e20 <Groundwater elevation contour line with apparent flow direction, elevation in feet
o Vapor extraction well
e Exploratory soil boring
Underground utility line: -G- gas, -S- sewer, -I[-- water
APPRO)ilMATE SCALE (FT,)
mHp1
aa
2'4
:{
Tf
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Y
"%
N
I
02040 80
i FIGURE 3: GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP,
CASH SAVER, RICHFIETD, UTAH
"l
.J
BIJtrJING
O
IyEI 1093-4
" -'t
I
i
a
t0
a
a
ll
I
x
H
IA
a-
ao B7 Lruo BIO
SIGN
DIf'PENSER
ISIIINI)
3OO SOIJIH S1TEET
n0
s'IoRt{
DRAIN590
a
q t 580
t 460
t 110
t 200
o23
86o
500
a
r,200
B2e
6t0
[-flons
1400
t I,0M
eow
B1
e
l\ h,o-z-ct.c-
oht%
810
9, ?DD banr.ene-
o83
B4.- -. B-9o r__rn B-9- ,a
173B 2,000+l-em,f Z00o+740
I r IOD t€e,^zef.4- pf b
LEGEND
A0o0* r Soil gas survey point, concentration in pp (?
9 Groundwater monitoring well
o Vapor extraction well'
O Exploratory soil boring
AUGEA
CtJTIlNGS
N
' nr.)
LO rt
Trrd:q-,c f
b-1
ik,m B-t
Underground utility line: -G- gas, -S- sewer, -IT- water rlsl ,kilr4( B-f
APPROXIMATE SCALE (FT.)
0 40 80
FIGURE 2: SITE MAP, SOIL BORING, GROUNDTTATER MONITORING
WELL AND VAPOR EXTRACTION ITELL LOCATIONS,
CASH SAVER, RICHFIELD, UTAHIi-l
.l
!ilo
4a
BT]ilDING
O
I
j
I
.J
I
I
,
JJ
ITEI 1093-4
APPENDIXA
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
') -)I
I
I
I
I
I *ra*
****
UTAH DIVISIO}I OF LIATER RIGHTS
ITATER RIGHT PoINT 0F DMRSION PLOT CREATED TUE, JUN Z, 199?, 11:39 Attl
PLOT SHOUS LOCATION OF 40 POINTS OF DIVERSION
PLOT OF AN AREA I.'ITH A RADIUS OF 5280 FEET FROM A POINT
N 1250 FEET, E 15OO FEET OF THE SI.I CORNER,
SECTION 25 TOIINSHIP 23S RANGE 3I.I SL BASE AND IiIERIDIAN
PLOT SCALE tS APPROXII.IATELY 1 INCH = 2000 FEET
NORTH
*********************
***
****
***
0*!r*
2 **
*
*
*
*
*
**
***
3
***
***
***
*
*
*
*
li
i
I,
4
*
*
*5 *
t
*
*
6 Z7
lz
lfn ,so?t-Ll
7
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*H
D
14**
*0
*
*
*
9 I
CBA*E
****
F
***********
*
*
G
JK
L
I
"J
J
J
J
J
J
J
R OP
****
x***
*
T s***UV **
!'l ***
***
**********
,)
NUPLAT
UTAH DIVISION OF LJATER RTGHTS
POINT OF DIVERSION LOCATION PROGRAM
HlP
AR
UATER
RIGHT cFs
OUANT I TY
AND/OR AC-FT
SO{,JRCE DESCRIPTION oT L,ELL INFO POTNT OF DIVERSION DESCRIPTION
DIAI.IETER DEPTH YEAR LOG NORTH EAST CNR SEC TI.,N RNG B&M
UAPTSUPR
NPEEUGTE
NPRRR!JPD
U 63 2258
63 2109
63 1081
63 108?
63 1093
63 1084
63 1083 .1250
I.JATER USE(S):
Richf ietd City Corponation
.0150 .00 6
WATER USE(S) : STOCKIi,ATERING OTHER
ldeaI Dairy Inc,
.0150 .00 6
lJATER USE(S) ; IRRIGATI0N DOI'IESTIC
Avery, A[ [en
.1250 .00 16
I./ATER USE(S):
Richf iel,d City Corporation
.1250 .00 16
UATER USE(S):
Richf ietd City Corporation
1.5000 .00 16
t,,ATER USE(S) : IRRIGATI0N MUNICIPAL
Richf iel,d City Corporation
.1000 .00 16
I,IATER USE(S) : IRRIGATION MUNICIPAL
Richf iel.d City Corporation
107
151 Ll. Center St.
81
90 North 400 East
?90
P.O. Box 212
290
P.0. Box 242
290
P. 0. Box 250
?90
P.Q. Box 242
68
709 East Znd North
71
42 South 1 East
75
415 North 500 lJest
700
166 North Main Street
.00 16 290
P"O. Box 242
.00 Richf iel.d Ci ty Spring
N 20 r,l 699 sE 21 23s 3r.t sL x
PRIoRITY DAIE: 06/21 /1978Richfiel,d UT 84701
s 838 68 NL, 25 23S 3U SL X
PRI0RITY DATEz 07 /07 /1976Richfietd UT 84701
s 251 u 1249 N4 25 23s 3tJ sL x
PRIORITY DATE: OO/OO/1921Richfietd UT 84701
s 251 u 1249 N4 25 23s 3r./ sL x
PRI0RITY DATE: 00/00/1921Richfiel.d UT 84701
s 251 w 1?49 N4 25 23s 3t.J sL x
PRIoRITY DATE: 00/00/1898Richfieid UT 84701
s 251 w 1?49 N4 25 23s 3!{ sL x
PRI0RITY DATE: 00/00/1886Richfietd UT 84701
s 251 ,t 1219 N4 ?5 23s 3r.J sL x
PRI0RITY DAtEz 00/00/19?1Richfiel.d UT 84701
X
x
X
x
X
x
.i.
x
?
3 63 3160 2.0000] I.,ATER USE(S): IRRIGATION
Richf iel,d City Corporation
63 348 .0150 .00
WATER USE(S) : STOCKIIATERING
Eeutter, Charles
7 63 2084 .0150 .00 6, IIATER USE(S): IRRIGATION STOCKI,,ATERING
Christensen, Boyd L.
q
63 1907 .0150 .00
WATER USE(S) : STOCKIIATERING
Peterson, VenI A.
a11339 1.7090 0R 413.00
TJATER USE(S) : I'IUNIClPAL
Richf iel.d Ci ty Corporation
s 1400 tJ 1800 NE 26 23S
PRIORITY DATE
3U SL
o0/00/1865
UT
XX
)
3
t,
63 3161 2.0000 .00 CottonHood Creek
I.IATER USE(S) : I4UNICIPAL
Richf iel.d City Corporation
63 3908 .0150 .00 6 100 300 s 2500 u
I.JATER USE(S): IRRIGATION DOI'IIESTIC STOCKI.JATERING
Kelsey, Deon ll. 325 l,Jest t.li t lowbrook
63 1906 .0300 .00 4 200
IIATER USE(S): IRRIGATI0N STOCKLTATERING
Stott, Joseph S. and Bonnie Ruth 610 Uest 800 South
s 1400 Lt 1800 NE ?6 23S 3t., SL X X
PRI0RITY DATE: 00/00/1865Richfietd UT 8470'l
4500 NE 30 23S 2u SL X
PRI0RITY DATE: 05/09/1989
Richfietd UT 84701
N 2310 L, 1571 54 30 23S 2r1 SL X
PRI0RITY DAIe:. $/22/ 1935Richfietd UT 81701
N 2020 E 340 sH 30 23S 2!J sL X
PRI0RI TY DAIE: 09 /18/1956Richfietd UT 84701
N 1 198 v 1?8 sE 25 23s 31,, sL x
PRI0RITY DATE: 01 /20/1976Richfietd UT 81701
N 150 E 100 stJ 30 23s 2u sL x
PRI0RITY DArEz 12/14/197?
Richfietd UT 84701
tJ 500 N4 36 23S 3tJ SL X
PRI0RITY DAtEz 05/21 /1987Richfietd UT 8/1701
s 100 ,t 2193 NE 36 23S 3l., SL X
PRI0RITY DATE: 00,r00l1915
Richfiel.d UT 81701
x
x
1 x
x
X
X
4
20)
A
<-
X63 1126 -8800 .00 Underground tJater tJe[[
UATER USE(S): IRRIGATT0N ST0CKIJATERING
Jensen, Jay 308 East 2nd South
I
l
14AP
NI.'PLAT
UTAH DIVISION OF LIATER RIGHTS
POINT OF DIVERSION LOCATION PROGRAI{
lilATER
RIGHT
OUANT I TY
CFS AND/OR AC-FT
SOURCE DESCRIPTION or I.IELL INFO POINT OF DIVERSIoN DEscRtPTtoN
DIAMETER DEPTH YEAR LOG NORTH EAST CNR SEC TI.'N RNG 8&I,I
UAPTSUPR
NPEEUGTE
NPRRRt.JPD
63 1039 1.0000 .00 Underground t,ater Ltel, l,
t,ATER UsE(S): IRRIGATI0N
Vermi t Iion I rrigation Company
s 141 LJ 2185 NE 36 23S 3t., SL X
PRIoRITY DATE: 00/00/1915
Sigurd UT 84657
s 1208 15 NtJ 31 23S 2W SL x
PRt0RITY DAIEz 01 /1?/1954Richfiel,d UT
s 214 !J 75 NE 35 23S 3!J SL x
PRI0RI TY DAIE= 07 /27 /1963Richfietd UT 84701Richfietd UT 84701Richfiel,d UT 8/1701
s 241 E 267 NlJ 31 23S 2W SL X
PRI0RITY DAIez 0?/11 /1965Richfietd UT 84701
s 300 U 1250 NE 35 23S 3t.l SL X
PRIoRI TY DATEz 05/13/1987Richfiehd UT 8/1701
N 2174 r.,254 E4 35 23S 3r.J SL X
PRI0RITY DAIE: 02/02/1965Richfietd UT 84701
s 591 !, 891 NE 36 23S 3tl SL x
PRI0RITY DATE: 08/03/1955Richfiel.d UT 84701
X
I X663 256 .0150 .00
WATER UsE(S): STOCKI.IATERING
Hetquist, Atvin
63 437 .0390 .00
WATER USE(S) : STOCKLIATERING
Palmer, Rhoda L.
Patmer, Phi t t ip lrl.
Patmer, Stanton L.
63 45' .0110 .00 3
UATER UsE(s) : SToCKLIATERING
Isbet[, Richand tl.
78
24 E. 4th N.
80
67
58 North Third t,est
80 - 150
352 South 500 llest
82
105 East 5th North
92
75 s 754E
58 North 3rd tlest
256 N 4391 !t
(c/o Homer R. Bandtey, President)
67 s 902 rJ
/+88 North First East
268 s 10/10 LJ
68
355 South 2nd llest
.,2
160 South 500 LJest
3
I
I
D
I
J
X
x63 3837 .0150
IJATER UsE(S): 0THER
Jones, Horrard l'1.
006
002
63
63
63
63
63
x
X2
150K63
I.J
163
I
1
t
M63
I*J ..
454 .0150 .00
IJATER USE(S) : STOCKUATERING
Bradshar, Jack H.
309 .0150 .00 4
I.,ATER USE(S) : STOCKI.,ATERING
Hazen, Richard E. (c/o Southern Suppl.y C
333 .0150 .00
I,ATER USE(s) : STOCKLJATERING
Isbelt, Richard Ll. and Lita L.
sT3 .0150 .00 3
l,,ATER USE(S) : STOCKI.,ATERING
Sevier VaItey Broadcasting Co. Inc.
442 .0150 .00 2
TJATER USE(S): STOCKIIATERING
Thompson, Jay
.0500 .00 5
bIATER USE(S): DOMESTIC STOCKWATERING OTHER
lntermountain Packing and Cotd Storage C
X2
x
2 767 Nt., 31 23S zLJ SL X
PRI0RITY DAIEz 03/24/1956Richfietd UT 84701
1809 sE 36 23s 3r.' sL x
PRI0RITY DATE: 06/05/1958Richfiel,d UT 84701
3 NE 36 23S 3!J SL x
PRI0RITY DATE: 03/17/1961
Richfietd UT 84701
1200 NE 36 23S 3u sL x
PRI0RITY DAIE: 05/03/1947Richfiel,d UT 84701
N 1477 U 2716 E4 36 23s 3u sL x
PRI0RITY DATEz 05/13/1955Richfiel.d UT 84701
s 1239 E 602 NU 31 23S 2U SL X
PRr0RITY DATE. 05/21/1951
RichfieLd UT 84701
x
X
X
X
298 .0150
I'JATER USE(S) : D0MESTIC
Poulsen, Reed 0.
265 .0150 .00
I',ATER USE(S) : STOCKTJATERING
Hatch, Eart C. and Sadie G.
1126 .0000
63 2806 .0150 .00
I,ATER USE(S) : STOCKI.,ATERING
Christensen, FaretI H.
00 Underground l.later. LJelt s 1418 E 1960 NlJ 36 23s
PRIORITY DATE
Richfietd
Richfiel.d
3tJ sL
00/00/1900
UT
UT
XX
UATER USE(S): IRRIGATION STOCKI.,ATERING
Ogden, J. Larue
Poutson, Henry Bnooks
81701
81701
X6
445 E. Center St.
60 1986 Y
1205 I'tcCarty
33 NE 36 23S 3LJ SL X
PRIORITY DAIEz 06/?6/1984
Fai rbanks AL 9970'l
s 1528 r.J
NLJPLAT
UTAH DIVISION OF IJATER RIGHTS
POINT OF DIVERSION LOCATION PROGRAM
-t
I
I
MAP IJATER
RICHT cFs
OUANT I TY
AND,/OR AC- FT
SOURCE DESCRIPTION oT LIELL INFO POINT OF DIVERSTON DESCRIPTIoN
DIAI.IETER DEPTH YEAR LOC NORTH EAST CNR SEC TI.'N RNG B&M
UAPTSUPR
NPEEUGTE
NPRRRUPD
53 447 .0150 .00 2
t,ATER USE(S) : STOCKI'TATERING
Christensen, Dean R.
63 1744 .0150 .00 2
TJATER USE(S) : STOCKIIATERING
Hatch, Juneius A.
63 3994 .0150 .00 6
I',ATER USE(S): DO.IESTIC STOCKWATERING
Btood, Bryan B. and Cathy
63
685 East 5th North
63
/r08 trest 200 South
100 - 200
875 North 300 Llest
68
355 South Znd tlest
84
525 South Main Street
1?6 1e8? Y
NG
Box 889
18 Nt, 31 23s zLJ SL X
PRIoRITY DATE: 05/25 / 1963Richfietd UT 84701
N 792 rJ 1056 E1 36 23S 3u sL x
PRI0RITY DAIEz 07 /31 /1961Richfietd UT 84701
N 794 r.t 1361 EI 36 23s 3u sL x
PRIORITY DATE: 07101/1968Richfiel,d UT 84701
N 750 !t 2000 E4 35 23s 3t, sL x
PRI0RITY DAtEz O4/28/1992Richfietd UT 8/.701
X
x
x
63 429 .0100 .00 2 63 s
IJATER USE(S) : STOCKITATERING
Ogden, tlorris D. 397 Uest Fifth South
63 1682 .1000 .00 Underground llater ttett N
t,ATER USE(S): IRRIGATION
ogden, J. Lerue
Poutson, Henry C.
lJaIt, t4eivin
63 341 .0150 .00
IIATER USE(S) : STOCKI.JATERING
Oldroyd, Milan T.
75
825 !r4 36 23s 3!J sL X X
PRIoRITY DATE: 00/00/1909
Richfiel,d UT 84701Richfiel,d UT 84701
Richfietd UT 84701
N 165 E 2412 t,4 36 23s 3H sL X
PRI0RITY oAtE: 08/28/1956Richfiel,d UT 84701
N 157 v 2746 E4 36 23S 3r., sL x
PRI0RITY DATE: 05/13/ 1955
Ri chf i etd UT 8/1701
N 2475 r,t 3551 sE 36 23s 3tJ sL x
PRIoRITY DATE: 07 /01 /1963Richfiel,d UT 84701
N 1750 t,, 1940 sE 36 23s 3r.t sL x
PRI0RI TY DATE: 04/?9 / 198?
R i chf i el.d UT 84701
2207 E
415 E
x
x2
63 299 .0150
I'TATER USE(S) : DOMESTIC
Poutsen, Reed 0.
00?X
x
x
63 432 .0050 .00
WATER USE(S) : STOCKbIATER]NG
Christensen, Reed
63 2480 .0150 .00 6
!,ATER USE(S): IRRIGATI0N DOMESTIC SToCKL,ATERt
Lug[ io, Gioacchino p.O.
2
APPENDIXB
Wasatch Environmental, lnc.
1
i,
j
,]
j
I
I
-l
IJ
)
NA'T[' NRII.T,RD n/13/92
F
E'.1
F-lfi
Fo-
EEI
H
f:1Jg-
(n
C)z
=o.
J
eO
F
OF.
CN
=OJm
a
o
b.e
Fz
tr1Fz,
(J
Etr]F
=
hv)X
E.<:qf'l F
v) z,
Frl&F(n
l.occElt BY DW
CITRF'ACN EI.!IVATTNN Not Determined
nPilL plc Mnhil R61
BORINC DIAMFITTIR B Inches
NFPTI{ TO CROIINNWATRR 10 Feet
D!;5UT(II'1'IUN ANIJ C
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONSIST
Asphalt
SAND and GRAVEL, moist
Fill
Clayey SILT, damp
product odor/staining
wet @ 10 feet
CLAY, wet
Silty SAND, wet
light
brown
brown/red
brown
red
red
medium SP
SW
dense I
2
3
+
q
b
7
B
I
10
11
12
IJ
14
4EIJ
stiff ML
firm
very CL
dium SM
dense
15
7
21
134
13
1700
195
307
309
249
:7
BOTTOM OF BORING @ 15 FT
N0IE: fiE SIBAflnCAllON UNES
REPRESE},IT THE APPROXIXATI BOUNDANY
BETIYEEN llAlERlAL fiPESI THE TMNS-
TION I{AY BE GRADUAI.
tflrnsarcr
fftv rtn OtUtttrgM f A t, IU C
tN(l tc
CASH SAVER_R]CHFIELD
305 SOUTH MAIN, RICHFIELD, UTAH
lt BORING
N0.B3
1 093-4 .IIIN 1q92
I
l
l
I
-l
l
))
F
FgftrlE.
F
f.la
l'l
FItr-
=V)
FOO
v)
=o
FI
ca
Ap.
=
E-z
Fz,oO
&
fElF
=
I{ELL
CONSTRUCTION
RTIFF:RTINCE F:LEVAT]ON 100.39
DRII,I, RIC Mobil 861
BORING DIAMETER 10 In.
DF]PTH TO CROIINDWATI':R 10.65 Ft
DESCRIPTION ANI) CI.SSIF'IEATIO
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONSlST SOIL
TYPFI
Cement
SAND and GRAVEL, damp
Fiu f
Ciayey SILT, damp
product odor, some staining
iittlesand@9feet
CLAY, wet
Silty SAND, wet
Ciayey SILT, little Sand, little
organics, wet
Fine Sandy SILT, wet
Clayey SILT, wet
iight
brown
brown/
red
brown
red
red
red
red
--b-to-wn--
red
medium
dense
stiff
stiff
medium
dense
stiff
stiff
stiff
SP/
SU,,
ML
c;
SM
ML
ML
ML
- 2-
T
- 6-
B
-10-
-12-
- 14 -
_16_
-18-
-20 -
-22-
-24-
X
X
15
t2
1 0
I
?
50
11
41
CEIIEI{T
BEIITONIlI
4-ln PryC
EI,ANI(
4-ln PIIC
0.0?'
slomED
SCREEN
to/zo
coloMD0
sucA sAlrD
16/40
COIOMDO
SIUCA SAID
4*ln PttC
0.0r"
slontsD
SCREN
4-ln PVC
BI.ANK
BOTTOM OF WELL @ 22.55 FT.
BOTTOM OF BORING @ 22.5 FT
NdlE: l}lE SIBAflHCATION UNES
REPRESE}'IT THE APPROXIMAI! BOUNDARY
BETIIEEN HATERIAI TYPES; THE TRANS-
TION XAY BE CMDUAL.
f'{z,grcrT
t {nc
CASH SAVER-RICHFIELD
305 SOUTH MAIN, RICHFIELD, UTAH
PRO.TFIr''B4
1Cp3-&.il]Nr 1992
l
{
I
.i
))
10 00 Ff-r
Frltr
/
o-
tr1o
=L
v)
FooFr
v)
=oJ
ca
a.
o
Fz,
fElE-z,
()
&fr]F
=
}{ELL
CONSTRUCTION
DRII,I, RIC lr,{obil 861
BORING DIAMETER 10 ln.
DEPTH TO CROIINDWATT]R 9.07 Ft.
DESCR]PTION AND EI,
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONSIST SUIL
TYPE
Asphalt
SAND and GRAVEL, damp
Fill4
Sandy SILT, some staining, damp
Clayey SILT, damp
Silty SAND, damp
Clayey, SILT, wet
Sandy SILT, wet
Clayey SILT, wet
brown
red
brown
medium
dense
stiff
stiff
loose
firm
firm
firm
SP/,
SV
ML
-2-
- 4-
- 6-
d
-10-
-12-
- 14 -
_ 16 _
- 18 -
20
-12-
-24-
I
8
5
5
40
10
5
5
,
D
0
0
BENTONIM
4-ln PVC
Bt4ltx
d-ln PVC
0.02"
SLOmED
SCNEEN
10/20
c0lrMDo
suJcA
16/40
corcMD0
stucA
4-ln PVC
0.0t"
$.oTTTD
SCREEN
4-ln PVC
BIANI(
red
brown
red
--brs!ryr--
red
red
ML
ML'
/\
X
BOTTOM OF WELL @ 22.55 FT.
BOTTOM OF BORING @ 22.5 FT
NOIE: 1}lE SIRAflflCATION UNES
REPRESENT THE APPROXIIATE BOUNDARY
BmYgEN llAtERlAL TYPES: THE TRNS-
TION I'AY BE GMDUAL.
/{z^yrca
Etvrttnoruttrgtvrut,{nC.
CASH SAVER_RICHFIELD
305 SOUTH MA]N, RICHFIELD, UTAH
PRo.IFIC'B5]:Gj./-+.IIINE 1992
1
l
j
-l
i
I
I
I
I
l
l
l
I
l
I
I
.l
l
.i
I
j
)-)
98.33 ?trrtrlt\
E-
trtrrA
f:lJo-
=(n
FO
h
cn
=-tco
AA
=O
Fz
fE1-zo(J
df:lF
=
lTELL
CONSTRUCTION
DRII,I, RIC Mohil 861
BORING DIATI ETFIR 10 ln,
DEPTH TO CROIINDITATF'iR 8.35 Ft.
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONS]ST s0tL
TYPN
Asphalt
SAND and GRAVEL, damp
Fi]I {
Silty CLAY, damp
someSand@5feet
wet @ 9 feet
CLAY, wet
Sandy SILT, wet
Clayey SILT, little Sand, wet
brown
stiff
SP
CL
CL
ML
ML
-2-
- 4-
-6-
5
- 10 -
-12-
- 14 -
-16-
-18-
-20 -
-22-
F
I
I
o
7
I
5
t
,
0
0
0
0
:7:
U!I!;IIT
EENTONIIT
tl-ln PVC
BI.ANI(
4-ln PVC
0.vt'
stotlED
scnxEN
t0/20
c0toMD0
stuct sAlrD
t6/40
coloMDo
slucA sA]'lD
4-ln PVC
0.0t"
stolTED
SCREIN
red
red
red
red
stiff
stiff
firm
BOTTOM OF 1YELL @ 20 FT.
BOTTOM OF BORING @ 20.5 FT
NOll: lllE SIRAIIFICAT|0N UNES
REPRSSENT THE APPROXIIIA'IE BOUNDARY
BEflEEII MA1ERIAI TYPES: THE TBNS_
NON }IAY BE GMDUAL.
Wzsarcu
fftVrttnOnttrgtVrut,{UC
. l.Oi
CASH SAVER_RICHF]ELD
305 SOUTH MAIN, RICHFIELD, UTAH
pl?n_rFlcT Nn IAT B6L@H-TIiNF 1qq2
.t
l
l
I
-l
))
tV
1 a Ftrltrlfr.
Fo-
EElG
rJo-
v)
FO
C)fr
m
=o*l
ca
A.a
o
Fz
rr1Fz,oO
lt]F
=
WELL
CONSTRUCTION
DRII,I, R]G Mohil 861
BORING DIAMTITER 10 In.
DEPTH TO CROUNDWATER 8.00 F't.
DESCRIPT]ON AND REMARKS COLOR CONSIST SUtt
rYPE
Asphalt
SAND and GRAVEL, damp
product odor
FiII4
Fine Sandy SILT, staining, some
organics, damp
SILT and CLAY, staining/odor, damp
some organics @ 10 feet
Fine Sandy SILT, wet
Silty Clay, little fine Sand, wet
Silly SAND, wet
brown
brown
red
brown
red
red
red
red
medium
dense
st iff
stiff
stiff
stiff
very
ioose
sP/t
sly/
ML
CL
ML
CL
-2
4
6
I
-"1
-_
-10-
-12-
- 14 -
_ 16 _
- 18 -
20-
*
I
L4
I
,
,
5
5
I
I
,
0
0
:Z
CEIIB{T
EENTONITT
4-ln PVC
BI.ANK
t6/40
corcMD0
slllcA
4-ln PvC
0.0t"
s.0TmD
SCREEN
SM
BOTTOM OF TfELL @ 20 FT.
BOTTOM OF BORING @ 20.5 FT.
* indicates Baggie and Jar Sample
N0lE: l}lE SIRAflHCAflON UNES
REPRESENT THE APPROXII{A'I3 BOUNDANY
BETIIEEN UA1ERIAL TYPES: THE TRANS-
TION I{AY BT GMDUAL
Wzszrcrv
Etvrttaouttgtvtut,fuc
CASH SAVER_RICHFIELD
305 SOUTH MAIN, RICHF'IELD, UTAH
PRO.IFlfl'B71CP3.4 ,TIINE 1992
I
1
l
)i
F
r=1r:l
Fo-tr]a
1
,R
e
rI1
o-
v)
FOOfr
v)
=O
-lca
Aa.
o
Fz,
fr1-z,OO
EllF
=
WELL
CONSTRUCTION
DRIIJ, RIG Mnhil 861
BORINC DIAMETER 10 In,
DEPTH TO GROIINDWATNR 10.34 Ft
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS COLOR CONS]ST SUIL
wpn
Cement
Ciayey SILT, some Sand, little Gravel,
damp
product odor Fiu t
Well graded SAND, some Silt, damp
product odor/staining, wet @
10 feet ,lFitI
Silty CLAY, little fine Sand, wet
.!-Lo-q!g!-odor
Silty SAND, wet
-plod-uqt--9-{qr----
Silly CLAY, little organics, wet
Fine Sandy SILT, wet
Ciayey SILT, wet
brown medium
dense
loose
soft
ML
SW
CL
CL
ML
- 2-
- 4-
-6-
8-
-10-
-12-
- 14 -
_ 16 _
-18-
-20 -
22
-24-
3
13
EEI'ITONIM
4-ln PVC
0.0?'
SIOTTED
SCREIN
to/zo
c0toMD0
SAND
tB/40
SA}.ID
d-ln PVC
0.0t"
stft'mD
SCNEBI
4-ln PvC
B],ANX
brown
red
red
red
red
trrown
medium
--deusc--
stiff
stiff
stiff
650
red ML
BOTTOM OF ITELL @ 22.5 FT
N0lS: I}lE SIRAIHCAfl0N UNES
REPRESENT THE APPROXIUAIE BOUNDARY
BEI'I|EEN MATERIAI fiPES: THE fiANS-
NON UAY BE GMDUAT,
Wa,grc{
EtvrtnOnttrgtVf At,{tUC
CASI SA\/&RIGIFITTD
305 MAIN, R]CHF]ELD, UTAH
PRO.TF:(--'
B8
1 093-4 JIIIv 1992
l
.J
F
r-1
F4h
Ftr-
frla
trJJo-
tf)
FO
F.
v)
=
-lco
AA
=
Fz
fElFzo
CJ
eFlF
=
IiELL
CONSTRUCTION
100.52 Ft.
BORINC NIAT'ETF:R 10 In.
DEPTH TO CROIINDWATER 1 1.04 Pt.
DESCRIPT]ON AND REMARKS COLOR CONSlST SUIL
TYPN
Asphalt
SAND and GRAVEL, damp
4
Clayey SILT, damp
-plo-dugl-staining
Sandy SILT, damp
product odor, staining
wet @ 9 feet
Silty CI,AY, wet
_prp_d_uel_o_do_r-slarni-ng-
Sandy SILT, wet
product odor
Silty CLAY, wet
product odor, some organics
brown
red
brown
red
red
red
medium
dense
stiff
firm
stiff
stiff
stiff
SP /,
SY
ML
ML
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
5
1QIU
Y
BEN?ONIM
4-ln PVC
0.0?'
$TTIID
SCREEN
to/zo
c0[onAD0
SIIJCA SA}ID
t6/10
c0toRADo
stuc,A sAl,rD
4-ln PVC
0.01"
SI,OTIEI)
SCREEI
4-ln PYC
BHNK
CL
;;;,1
800ML
CLred
BOTTOM OF WELL @ 22.5 FT
N0IE: l}lD SIRATIflCATI0N IJNES
REPRESENT THE APPROXI}IIIE BOUNDARY
BETTIEEN UATIRIAL TYPES: THE TRANS-
TION XAY BE GMDUAL.
Wz^ur0T
Etvrrnonttrnvrzz,fUC.
CASI SAT/R-RIGINED
305 MA]N, RICHFIELD, UTAH
PRr}-III:C'B9
1 093-4 .TIITY 1992
I
I
l
l
j
)
65 Ft1
1 1.05 Fr
DESERIPTION AND CL
tiutt
TYPN
Ag
o
E-ztr]FzOU
EtrlF
=
TiELL
CONSTRUCTION
dg
a-
=v)
FoOFr
(n
=OJ
ca
COLOR CONS]STDESCRIPTION AND REMARKS
BENTONIM
t6/10
Z-ln PVC
BI.ANK
Z-ln PVC
0.01"
slonm
SCREEIi
brown
red
brown
red
brown
red
-brqva--
red
brown
red
brown
red
medium
dense
medium
dense
stiff
stiff
stiff
stiff
stiff
i
Cement
SAND and GRAVEL, damp
Silty CLAY, damp
product odor, staining
Sandy SILT, damp
product odor, staining
Ciayey SILT, little fine Sand, wet
little organics
Fine Sandy SILT, wet
CLAY, damp
Silty SAND, wet
FiII4
SP
CL
ML
CL
2
4
6
I
10
12
14
16
1E
20
ML
ML
BOTTOM OF T{ELL @ 20 FT
NOIE: fiE SIRAnnCAll0N UNES
REPRESENT THE APPROXIUATT BOUNDAFY
BEfiTEN IIATERIAI TYPES: THE TRANS-
TION I{AY BE CMDUAL.n lnr
CASfl SASM*KIIEIED
305 MAIN, RICHFIELD, UTAH
NN DATPRO.Ilt:(l
JIITY 1992 810
1 093-4
/{z^yrcrT
Etvwnomttrgtvrut,{UC.
Ftrltrlh
Fo.
Frla