DERR-2024-012954

i. tt
Enuironmental S
("
eraices, lnc.
1277 East 8725 Soutlu Sandy, Utah Baffiffi
C ffi lVtr D
r. rl l' i: ii .ir;ii,r
CIEQ
-iilrririrrIenAt Response & Iienrerlialion
WELL INSTALLATION
AND F'IRST QUARTER GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
PREMIUM OIL GASOLINE STATION
FACILITY I.D.: # 2000222, SITE EGUP
305 SOUTH MAIN STREET
RICHF'IELD, UTAH
ocToBER 17,2005
PREPARED F'OR:
MR. ANDY CALLISTER
PREMIUM OIL COMPANY
2005 souTH 300 wEsT
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115
PREPARED BY:
ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1217 EAST 8725 SOUTH
SANDY, UTAH
Phone & FAX (801) s6L-827e
lar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Access Environmental Services, Inc. (Access Environmental) has been retained by the Premium Oil
Companyto conduct quarterlygroundwatermonitoringandto install one additional groundwatermonitoring
well at the subject property ("site") located at 305 South Main Street in Richfield, Utah. This well was
installed at the request of the Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation as documented
in a letter addressed to the Premium Oil Company dated September 22,2005.
On September 30, 2005, one additional groundwater monitoring well was installed approximately 65 feet
east of the former dispenser island. The new well has been designated "MW-7". Note: Soil sampledfrom
the MW-7 boring tested clean. The new well was designed to be a "perimeter well" in order to define the
eastern extent of petroleum hydrocarbon migration.
Existing groundwater monitoring wells, including the newly installed MW-7, were gauged, purged, and
sampled. Static groundwater-level measurements ranged from14.77 feetto 16.66feetbelowgrade. Based
on these measurements, groundwater flow direction was determined to be to the SSE.
Groundwater analytical reports listed concentrations of benzene and/or MTBE in excess of the Risk Based
Conective Action (RBCA) Tier I screening levels in groundwater sampled from MW-4, MW-5 (previously
named "GP-X"), and MW-6 (previously named *GP-Y"). Wells MW-4 and MW-5, located in the vicinity
ofthe westemportion ofthe former dispenser island, continue to be the most contaminated wells. Note: All
of the "perimeter wells", e.g. MW-[, MIry-2, MW-3A, and MW-7, tested clean.
In the context of historic data, concentrations of TPH (GRO), benzene, and MTBE increased in MW-4 and
MW-5 since the previous sample event in July 2005. The most notable increases were observed in MW-5
in which TPH (GRO) increasedfuom2.9l ppm to 13.40 ppm, benzene inueasedfrom0.644ppm to 2.160
ppm, and MTBE increased from I .452 ppm to 3.780 ppm. Note: Present petroleum hydrocarbon
concentrations in MW-S are similar to the March 2004 sample results.
We note that the water table measurements are approximately 0.5 feet higher compared to the July 2005
measurements. We conclude that the increase in petroleum hydrocarbon concentration may be the result
of groundwater encountering contamination in the capillary fringe as the water table rises. Additional data
will either support or discount this apparent correlation. The "second quarter" groundwater monitoring
event is scheduled for late December 2005.
, l.t
TABLE OX'CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION. .
2. SOIL SAMPLING/WELL INSTALLATIONS .
3. GROLiNDWATERMEASUREMENTS
4. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
5. RESULTS
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
I
I
2
J
4
6
Table 1.
Table2.
Table 3.
Summary of Groundwater Measurements
Soil Samples: Summary of Laboratory Analyses
Water Samples: Summary of Laboratory Analyses
J
4
5
Appendix A - Illustrations
Appendix B - Soil Boring/Well Installation Log
Appendix C - Laboratory Chemical Analytical Reports
1. INTRODUCTION
Access Environmental Services, Inc. (Access Environmental) has been retained by the Premium Oil
Companyto conduct quarterlygroundwatermonitoring andto install one additional groundwatermonitoring
well atthe subjectproperty ("site") located at 305 South Main Street inRichfield, Utah (F'igure 1, Appendix
A). This well was installed at the request ofthe Utah Division ofEnvironmental Response and Remediation
as documented in a letter addressed to the Premium Oil Company dated September 22,2005. The location
of this well was agreed upon by Ms. Melissa Turchy, project manager at the DERR, and with Mr. Andy
Callister, representing Premium Oil Company, prior to the installation.
The new well, designated MW-7, was installed on September 30, 2005. An environmental soil sample from
the well boring was retained for chemical analysis. Upon completion, the new and existing wells were
mapped, surveyed, gauged in order to evaluate the cu:rent groundwater slope and flow direction.
In accordance with the US-EPA guidance document, the groundwater monitoring wells will be monitored
on a quarterly basis for a period of two years after which time, the site will be evaluated for monitor-
ing/natural attenuation (lvINA) in leu of aggressive site remediation. This approach was recommended in
the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) report submitted by Access Environmental on Ap1rl2I,2005. Baseline
groundwatermonitoring was conducted on July 12,2005 (ref, Well Installations and Baseline Groundwater
Monitoring Report, Access Environmental, 7/28/05). Thelirst quarter groundwater monitoring event was
conducted on September 30, 2005 in conjunction with the installation of MW-7. Results are presented
herein.
2. SOIL SAMPLING/WELL INSTALLATION
One additional well designated MW-7, was installed at the site on September 30, 2005. In accordance with
the referenced letter from the DERR, the new well was installed approximately 65 feet east of the former
dispensers and beyond (e.g. east) of MW-4 which has proven to be moderately contaminated (Figure 1,
Appendix A). It was necessary to install a well at this location in order to define the maximum eastern
extent of petroleum migration and to evaluate the potential for petroleum vapors beneath the store building.
Soil Samples.' Soil samples were acquired from the well boring using a Kansas-style "mega-sampler" device.
The sampling device was advanced ahead of the probe rods, yielding a 1.5 inch diameter, undisturbed soil
sample, across a four-foot interval. Sample drives were acquired from each boring at a depth of 8-12 feet
below grade. Although this interval is several feet above the current water table, this horizon was
determined to be most contaminated based on a previous investigation conducted by Dr. Bryan Furtek (ref,
Groundwater and Soil Sampling Report, I1/17/00). Data from this investigation (from GP-X, located at the
east end of the former dispenser island) showed petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in soil diminished
with increasing depth to minimal concentrations at a depth of sixteen feet.
Native,Sail.' Soil samples acquired from the borings indicated that native soil consisted predominantly of
silty clay (CL) with various amounts of silt. Note: In the sample range of 8-12 feet, the silt-rich layers were
mostly wet and the clay'rich layers were moist but not saturated. The soil boring/well installation log is
attached in Appendix B.
tl
Ilell Installation and First Quarter Groundwqter Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Stqtion
Richfield, Uah
page 2
Organic Vapor Readings: The organic vapor content ofthe soil samples was measured using a Mini-Rae
organic vapor meter equipped with a photo-ionization detector (OVM-PID). The instrument was internally
calibrated using a gas standard of known concentration. The instrument was tested before usage to assure
accuracy. Readings were taken by slowly dragging the tip ofthe OVM-PID auoss the length ofthe samples.
Organic vapor concentrations were all below the instrumental detection limit (Appendix B).
WeIl Installation: Thewell was installed at a maximum depth of 21 feet below grade inside of a 4"-diameter
boring. The well was constructed of 2"-diameter PVC well materials which included a 10 foot section of
casing on top of a l0 foot section of 0.01" factory-slotted well screen. The annulus of the boring was filled
with 10/20 silica sand to a level 2 feet above the well screen. The upper portion of the annulus was filled
with bentonite chips ("Crumble") in order to produce an impermeable surface seal. The well was topped
with a slip-cap and installed several inches below grade. The void surrounding the top of each well was
filled with sand. The soil boring/well installation log is attached in Appendix B.
3. GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENTS
On September 30, 2005, depth to groundwater was measured relative to the "top of well casings" (TOC) in
each well using an electronic water-level indicator. Depths varied from14.77 feet (MW-4) to 16.66 feet
(MW-l) below TOC. Specific measurements are listed in Table 1.
3.1 Groundwater Depth and Flow Direction
Groundwater monitoring wells were mapped and the relative elevations of the top of casings (TOCs) were
defined using an engineers level and measuring rod. Results are summarizedinTable 1.
l{ell Instsllation and First Quarter Groundtater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Uah
page j
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OX' GROTMIDWATER MEASUREMENTS
9/30/0s
83.6716.45toO.t22tMW-7
84.4415.60100.0420MW-6
84.9315.15100.0820MW-5
84.8114.7799.582tMW-4
85.0414.8s99.892tMW.3A
84.9615.04100.0020MW-3
84.2415.7099.9420MV/-2
83.2416.6699.9020MW-l
Relative Elevation
of Water Table (ft)
Groundwater
Depth (from TOC) (ft)
TOC (Top of Casing)
Relative Elevation (ft)
TOTAL
DEPTH (ft)
WELL
Based upon these data, a potentiometric groundwater surface map was generated using the SURFER
computer progftrm (Figure 2, Appendix A). The map shows a gradient sloping to the SSE with a relatively
flat gradient ofapproximately l/85 horizontaVvertical ratio betweenMW-l andMW-6. Note: Inthe context
of historic dato, the water table is qpproximately 0.5 feet higher than the previous measurements taken in
July 2005.
4.0 GROT]NDWATER SAMPLING
Each well was purged of approximately 3 well volumes (e.g. 5 gallons) of water using a disposable plastic
bailer. Note: Several wells were bailed dry after extracting only 2-3 gallons of water. The same bailer
(dedicated to the specific well) was utilized to sample groundwater approximately 45 minutes later. Samples
were retained in 40 ml VOC glass bottles capped with Teflonlined lids. Bottles were completely filled
allowing no headspace. Soil samples were removed directly from the plastic sample sleeves and
immediately packed inside of a 4 oz glass jar and capped with a Teflon-lined lid.
All environmental samples, e.g. soil and groundwater, were sealed, labeled, immediately placed in cold
storage, and transported under chain of custody to Utility Testing Laboratory, an E.P.A. certified and DERR
approved laboratory, for analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH, EPA method 80158 modified),
MTBE and the aromatic hydrocarbons: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and naphthalene (BTE)O{;
EPA method 8021B). Sample results are presented in Section 5.
Well Installation and First Quarter Groundwqter Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 4
5. RESULTS
Analyses are documented in the Laboratory Analytical Reports (Appendix C). Soil sample results are
summarized in Table 2. Groundwater sample results are summaf,ized,inTable 3.
TABLE 2. SOL SAMPLES
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
Results itt ppm
Note: ppm: mg/kg
BOLD: Value exceeds the RBCA Tier I screening levels.
5.1 Soil Sample Analytical Summary
Soil analytical reports listed concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons below the Risk Based Corrective
Action (RBCA) Tier I screening levels andbelow the instrumental detection limits.
<0.110<0.200<0.330<0.110<0.110<0. I l0<l0.00cRo
<10.0ODRO
MW-7 @ 8-10'
0.300l023s236l0.9001,500TIER 1
TIER I Screening Levels; SOIL (used internally by the DERR as an initiat clean-up evaluation standard)
MTBE
(ppm)
Naphth
(ppm)
Total
Xylenes (ppm)
Ethylbenzene
(ppm)
Toluene
(ppm)
Benzene
(ppm)
TPH (ppm)Sample
Identity
Aromatic
lMell Installation and First Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
RichJield, Utah
page 5
TABLE 3. WATER SAMPLES
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
Results in ppm
Note: ppm:mg[-
Continued on Next Page
3.780<0.2000.298 1.5202.7302.16013.40 GRO
<0.50 DRO
15.159t30t05
1.4520.0060.3990.0730.3510.6442.91 GRO
<0.50 DRO
15.627n2/0s
2.47<0.0101.2500.3300.0172.4509.52 GRO
2.55 DRO
**3/t/04MW-5
(GP-X)
3.I10<0.2001.0300.2690.6421.1708.08 GRO
<0.50 DRO
14.779130/05
0.8670.0030.2240.0700.1330.286l.SlGRO
<0.5 DRO
15.207ll2l05MW-4
<0.002<0.004<0.006<0.002<0.0020.003<0..50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
14.8s9t30t0s
<0.004<0.002<0.0060.006<0.0020.0190.52 GRO
1.50 DRO
15.407/12105MW-3A
0.2000.01I0.2810.0500.1560.2602.84 GRO
<0.50 DRO
15.049/30t0s
0.1390.0240.4480.0890.2630.2404.31 GRO
2.08 DRO
15.507/12105MW-3
0.003<0.004<0.0060.004<0.0020.0020.60 GRO
<0.50 DRO
15.709130105
0.0100.002<0.0060.004<0.0020,0030.59 GRO
<0.50 DRO
16.207n2t05MW-2
0.1 05<0.004<0.006<0.002<0.002<0.002<0..50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
16.669t30t0s
0.1 59<0.002<0.006<0.002<0.002<0.002<0..50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
t7.04"ilr2t0sMW-l
0.20.173.04.07.00.300l0TIER I
TIER I Screening Levels; WATER (used internally by the DERR as an initial clean-up evaluation standard)
MTBE
(ppm)
Naphth
(ppm)
Total
Xylenes
(ppm)
Ethylbenz
(ppm)
Toluene
(pprn)
Benzene
(ppm)
*TPH
(ppm)
Depth
toGW
DateSample
ID
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
0.009<0.004<0.006<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
16.459t30t0sMW-7
0.s230.0080.0180.0520.0050.1 881.09 GRO
<0.50 DRO
15.609t30/0s
0.306<0.002<0.0060.009<0.0020.031<0.50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
16.0'17n2t05
0.401<0.002<0.006<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.50 GRO
<0.50 DRo
**3/1104MW-6
(GP-9
MTBENaphthXylenesEthylbenTolueneBenzeneTPHGWDateWell
l(ell Installation and First Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 6
BOLD: Value exceeds the TIER I screening levels.
* TPH: TPH(gro) and TPH(dro)
** Ref. "Report on Additional Soil and GW. . .", BryanFvtek,4/29104
5.2 Groundwater Sample Analytical Summary
Groundwater analytical reports listed concentrations of benzene and/or MTBE in excess of the Risk Based
Corrective Action (RBCA) Tier I screening levels in groundwater sampled from MW-4, MW-5 (previously
rutmed "GP-X"), and MW{ (previously named "GP-Y"). Wells MW-4 and MW-5, located in the vicinity of
the western portion of the former dispenser island, are crrrently the most contaminated wells. Note: All of the
"perimeter wells", e.g. MW-I, MW-2, MW-3A, and MW-7, tested clean.
In the context of historic data, concentrations of TPH (GRO), benzene, and MTBE increased in MW-4 and MW-
5 since the previous sample event in July 2005. The most notable increases were observed in MW-5 in which
TPH (GRO) inueased from 2.91 ppm to 13.40 ppm, benzene increasedfrom0.644 ppm to 2.160 ppm, and
MTBE increasedfroml.452ppmto 3.780 ppm. Note: Present petroleum hydrocarbon concentrotions in MW-S
are similar to the March 2004 sample results. ln contrast, petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the
"upgradient wells", MW-3 and MW-3A, decreased over the same time period.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On September 30, 2005, one additional groundwater monitoring well was installed approximately 65 feet east
of the former dispenser island. The new well has been designated "MW-7". Note: Soil sampledfrom the MW-7
boring tested clean. The new well was designed to be a'operimeter well" in order to define the eastem extent
of petroleum hydrocarbon migration. In accordance with the US-EPA guidance document, data acquired from
pt least two years of groundwater monitoring from these wells will be necessary to determine if monitor-
lng/natural attenuation (ivINA) may be implemented in leu of aggressive corrective action.
(
Well Installation and First Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Stqtion
Richfield, Utah
page 7
Existing groundwatermonitoring wells, including the newly installed MW-7, were gauged, purged, and sampled.
Static groundwater-level measurements ranged from 14.77 feet to 16.66 feet below grade. Based on these
measurements, gtoundwater flow direction was detennined to be to the SSE.
Groundwater analytical reports listed concentrations of benzene and/or MTBE in excess of the Risk Based
Corrective Action (RBCA) Tier 1 screening levels in groundwater sampled from MW-4, MW-5 (previously
named ooGP-X'), and MW-6 (previously named ooGP-Y"). Wells MW-4 and MW-5, located in the vicinity of
the westem portion of the former dispenser island, continue to be the most contaminated wells. Note: All of the
"perimeter wells", e.g. MW-L, MW-2, MW-3A, and MW-7, tested clean.
Inthe context ofhistoric data, concentrations of TPH (GRO), benzene, and MTBE increasedin MW-4 and MW-
5 since the previous sample event in July 2005. Note: Present petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in MW-s
are similar to the March 2004 sample results. We note thatthe water table measurements are approximately 0.5
feet higher compared to the July 2005 measurements. We conclude that the increase in petroleum hydrocarbon
concentration may be the result of groundwater encountering contamination in the capillary fringe as the water
table rises. Additional data will either support or discount this apparent correlation. The "second quarter"
groundwater monitoring event is scheduled for late December 2005.
Sincerely,
Services, Inc.Acces;E4vironmental
Af/d^ilr---
Lyle V. Phillips, Ph.D., UST #CC0043
Project Geologist
cc Melissa Turchy
Appendix A
ILLUSTRATIONS
Access Erwironmertal
lrtc.
SITE MAP App. Scale; 1"= 4{l'
Drafted by: LVP .Figure 1
PREMIUM OII GAS STATION
3O5 South Main Street
Richfield, Utah
3CO 9outn Streel
rY
+(,()L+-
rf)
g-6
I
Pown thop
Houee
9TORE
c3
c=
E3 +
i+
ilw-3
El (o"-E o YlJ/-7
O,.rwo
U9Ts
l.1w-5
or1w-l
ylw-6
(o"_Y
o
r{w-2
.f
n6ii
Former
dlspensr'
LEGEND
(p Ycnitortng\Nell
$ nezamerer
I"=4O'
o
MW-1
oa-
MW-7
s3.
MW-2-, GW
u.70
MW-4
-6
F
MW-3+
MW-3
160
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 140.00 180.00
Figure 2. Potentiometric Groundwater Surface Map (9/30/05)
Approximate Scale: l "=40'
220.00
Appendix b
3bn tsdttrNclwEI,I, rNSrALLartoN rdG
<1
<1
<1
<1
<L
<1
Concrete
2 ttEat{Jl
F'
5
rom
4
6
---1- sitrg chg {u[lh ruddteh br0rn, moderqfe pte*fietrg, ,
moisf, no peholeum odor..
I
1.0
L2
1.4
16
18
20
22
Weft soff
Molsf to drg; hard x.gctA-
E
4c4ge=c4
c).gv
o
Y.- WsterTsbte-16,45'
Eqts
og
=g
Access Enuironmental
Well Installation
Inc.
Soil Description
u
o(J
TS
€o.oa
Weather Sunng/75 FTotal Depth Llf
Rie 0eoprobeDrilling Comp Direct Pueh Servlces
tocation 3OE Soutfr Msin Srser, Richtret4 Urqlr
fiilte ID Prernlum Oit Gqeollne Stqnon
MW-7
Fonner diqpenser
EI
EI
Et
{Jo
o,*/
a
drda
el9arc5
. Mw-
Geologist Lste PfiltipcMAP 800 Sourh N
n
STOBUlt
Appendt* C
CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL REPORTS
(t'fn; EpA 80158 Modified; BTEXNavITBE; EPA 801.D
('-
l.
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
Analytical Report
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Glient:
Date Received:
Date Gollected:
Collection Time
Access Environmental
1217 E8725 S
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
13:00
Project:Richfield
Glient Field lD: MW-{
Laboratory lD: 093005-04 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Received By: Sabrina Woolsey
ResultsDate
TPH DRO (clO to G28)
TPH GRo (C6 to Gl0)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
10t07t2005
10t06t2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
o.oo2
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.004
< 0.50
< 0.50
0.105
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.006
< 0.004
SW-846 Method 80218 second column cpnfirmation not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by Date of lssue:11-Oct-05
Becky Holubek, Laboratory Director
1
1
2
All analyses performed in compliance with National EnviDnmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Client:
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Gollection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E 8725 S
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
13:30
Project Richfield
Client Field lD: ltIW.2
Laboratory lD: 093005-05 A, B
Analysie: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Received Byl Sabrina Woolsey
Method
TPH DRO (Cl0 to c28)
TPH GRo (c6 to GlO)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
'10t07t2005
10t06t2Q05
10/06/2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10t06t2005
10t06t2005
10t06t2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 802'18/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.004
< 0.50
0.60
0.003
0.002
< 0.002
0.004
< 0.006
< 0.004
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by: _
aecX
Date of lssue:11-Oct-05
1
1
2
All analyses performed in compliance with National Envircnmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
Analytical Report
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Glient:
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Collection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E 8725 S
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
14:Q0
Project: Richfield
Client Field lD: i,lw-g
Laboratory lD: 093005-06 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Receaved By: Sabrina Woolsey
ResultsReportingDate
TPH DRO {Cl0 to C28)
TPH GRO (G6 to Cl0)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
10t07t2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
s\ru-846 80218/5030B
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.004
< 0.50
2.84
0.200
0.260
0.{56
0.050
0.281
0.0t I
** Estimated value, analyte(s) detected above calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dilution Faclor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by: _g""L Date of lssue:11-Oct-05
,|
1
2
All analyses performed in compliance with National Envimnmental Laboratory Accreditation Confercnce (NEIAC) standards Page 1 of 1
A Utility Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: (88e)485-8941
Phone [phone]
Client:
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Gollection Time:
Access Environmental
'1217 E 8725 S
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
14:30
Project Richfield
Glient Field lD: Mtrtl-3A
Laboratory lD: 093005-07 A, B
Analysis: TpH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Received By: Sabrina Woolsey
Test ResDate
TPH DRO (clO to G28)
TPH GRO (GG to C10)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
't0t07t2005
10t06t2005
't0106t2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10106t2005
10/06/2005
'10t06t2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.004
Date of lssue:
< 0.50
< 0.50
< 0.002
0.003
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.006
< 0.004
11-Oct-05
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation nol confirmed
Dilution Factor Used:GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by: _
e""
1
1
2
All analyses performed in complience with National Environmental Laboralory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) standards page 1 of 1
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Analytical Report
Glientl Access Environmental
1217 E 8725 S
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Project:
Glient Field lD:
Laboratory lD:
Analysis:
Matrix:
Sample Received By
Richfield
MW.4
093005-08 A, B
TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXN
Water
Sabrina Woolsey
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Gollection Time:
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
15:00
Limit
TestDate
TPH DRO (010 to G2s)
TPH GRO (G6 to Gl0)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
1010712005
1010712005
10t07t2005
1010712005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
SW-846 80't58 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50309
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
5.00
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.300
0.200
< 0.50
8.08
3.{t0
1.170
0.642
0.269
1.030
< 0.200
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by: _ge Date of lssue:11-Oct-05
10
1
100
All analyses performed in compliance with National EnviEnmental Laboratory Accr€ditation Conference (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
('
l.
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Analytical Report
Client:Access Environmental
1217 E8725 S
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Project: Richfield
Glient Field lD: MW-s
Laboratory lD: 093005-09 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Received By: Sabrina Woolsey
Date Received:
Date Gollected:
Collection Time:
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
12:00
Test ResultsMethod
TPH DRO (Cl0 to C28)
TPH GRO (G6 to G10)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
SW-846 Method 8021B second column confirmation not confirmed
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
1UA7t2005
1010712005
10107t2005
10to7t2005
10t07t2005
10
1
100
0.50
5.00
0.100
0.'100
0.100
0.100
0.300
0.200
Date of lssue
< 0.50
t3.40
3.780
2.160
2.730
0.298
1.520
< 0.200
11-Oct-05Approved by: _
B
All anslyses performed in mmpliance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Confercnce (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
("
A Utility Testing Laboratory
'1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Analytical Report
Client:Access Environmental
1217 E 8725 S
Sandy, UT. 84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Project:Richfield
Client Field lD: IUIW-6
Laboratory lD: 093005-10 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Recoaved By: Sabrina Woolsey
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Collection Time:
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
12:30
Limit
Date
TPH DRO (ClO to C28)
TPH GRO (GG to GlO)
Methyl tert butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
10t07t2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10t06t2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10/06/2005
10t06t2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.004
< 0.50
{.09
0.523
0.188
0.005
0.052
0.018
0.008
." Estimated value, analyle(s) detec{ed above calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by Date of lssue:11-Oct-05
Becky Holubek, Laboratory Director
1
1
2
All analyses performed in mmpliance with National Envircnmental Laboratory Accreditalion Conference (NELAC) shndards Page 1 of 1
A Utility Testing Laboratory
Analytical Report
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Client:
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Collection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E 8725 S
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
16:00
Project: Richfield
Glient Field lD: ttllW-z
Laboratory lD: 093005-1 1 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Received By: Sabrina Woolsey
Limit
TestMethod
TPH DRO (Gl0 to G28)
TPH GRO (c6 to G{0)
Methyl tert-butyl eiher
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
10t07t2005
1010612005
10/06/2005
't0t06t2005
10/06/2005
10to6t2oo5
10/06/2005
10t06t2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 802,t8/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.004
< 0.50
< 0.50
0.009
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.006
< 0.004
pH> 2
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by Date of lssue 11-Oct-05
Becky Holubek, Laboratory Director
1
1
2
All analyses performed in compliance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditalion Conference (NELAC) shndards Page 1 of 1
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615 W.2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Report
Glient:
Date Received:
Date Gollected:
Gollection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E87255
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
09/30/2005
09/30/2005
11'.OO
Project Richfield
Client Field lD: t{fr1!-7 @A-12,
Laboratory lD: 093005-12
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Soil
Sample Received By: Sabrina Woolsey
Limit
TestMethod
TPH DRO (Ct0 to C28)
TPH GRO (c6 to GlO)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
10107t2005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
10t07t2005
10107t2005
1010712005
10.00
10.00
0.1't0
0.110
0.110
0.110
0.330
0.200
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50304
sw-846 80218/50304
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
< 10.00
< 10.00 ++
< 0.'110
< 0.110
< 0.110
< 0.110
< 0.330 ++
< 0.200 ++
++Surrogate Recovery outside acceptance limits indicating possible malrix interference
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by: _
A""ly
106.31
Date of lssue 11-Oct-05
All analyses performed in compliance with National EnviDnmental Laboratory Accreditation confeFnce (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
CONDITION OF SAMPI.ES
les Chiiled; fl Yes D No
Presenation lndicated: tr Yes tr No
Seals lntact:
.Remarks
trYes trNo
i
ln,
l"'J
l^
lnt
ltt3
1
Ronnrr Tn
4
3
a
a
^.vl'*o.)
3
i//
tl
V
t/
-1,/"
r,e/h"
Name)
To the atte2tioqof:
A+U ff+414
HnE--{7tgs----
e-maii / Fax:
bl
V
V
V
_.." -.. ,/-
v
\/
(
J.
V
I
I
!/
Received (signature)
ftid*a,LWfuW-
Received (sigrrature) U
Received (signature)
Receivei (signal.urel
lV)1,,-..-l
iflt tt\^)
iryt,,n-2Lj I tLA,i )
I
2lNwDatdlime:
Date/Time;
Date/Time
DaterTima:
4ioo
L/{,t
i ,11\
4':h/)
AU11 ,
!)' r\D
Jzr.a-rI -1 - 4i )
4lqp/K
q4a/N
4i4t,/fr+
4 {ea/f{
Lltilitv Testins Laborarory
.ut-labs.FAXr 801-467-00651615 W. 2200 S. Suire A Salr Lake t.,ltah B4ii9 Phone: 801485-S94t
ir)
A6r'f'*F(
Project N
Time
P
Date
5
Locationle ldentffication
\\L\L)
iJf-t
Re I i nq ujshfdts'lg n a [u re) :
c[/%\,brt;^
Relinquished (signatr.rre)
Relinqu isheci (signature)
COMMTNTS:
No.
of
cont.REMARKS
linquishcd
2
CONDITION OF SAMPI.ES
Chilled; tr Yes fl No
Preservation lndicated: tr Yes tl No
Seals lntact:trYes trNo
ttI
No.
of
cont.
Project Na
'[ me
P.O
REMARKS
i{\v
l{Date
Report
[*.
Llfis
Tc the
r?F ?1€./:-'-r:= -9-J?--t-)---
Address:
--ta
l-a^aL U.2
tif
e-rnail ,/ Fax:
f/
Received (signature)
fuj{r*o u;\f,*.U-
Received (signature){i
Received (signature)
Reccived (signature)
Tlailr-;
Datdlirne:
Date/Time
Date/Time:
DateiTime:
/ /,'/.0
"ilffi
-f/q0/K
utilitv Testing Laboratory
FAX: S0l-467-00651615 W. 2200 S. Suite A Salt Lake Utah 84119 Phoner 801485-8941
Relinquished (signature)
Relinquished (signature)
COMMINTS:
inquished (signature):
t