DERR-2024-012953

AggeJlg Enaironmental Sennces, Inc.
1217 East 8725 South, Sandy, Utah B4A94
WELL INSTALLATION
AND BASELINE GROTJNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
PREMIUM OIL GASOLINE STATION
F'ACILITY I.D.: # 2000222, SITE EGUP
305 SOUTH MAIN STREET
RICHX'IELD, UTAH
RECEIVED
AUG - ? 2005
DEO
rnvlr0nnenlal fiesponse & Bemediation
JULY 28,2005
PREPARED FOR:
MR. ANDY CALLISTER
PREMIUM OIL COMPAN"Y
2OO5 SOUTH 3OO WEST
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115
PREPARED BY:
ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1217 EAST 8725 SOUTH
SAI{DY, UTAH
Phone & FAX (ffii) s61-8ne
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Access Environmental Services, Inc. (Access Environmental) has been retained by the premium Oil
Company to install groundwater monitoring wells at the subject properly ("site") located at 305 South Main
Street in Richfield, Utah. Wells were installed at the request of the Utah Division of Environmental
Response and Remediation DERR in response to the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) submitted by Access
Environmental on April2l,2005 . In accordance with the US-EPA guidance document, the new and existing
wells will be monitored on a guarterly basis for a period of two years after which time, the site will be
evaluated for monitoring/natural attenuation in leu of aggressive site remediation.
On July 12,2005, th,ree additional groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site. The new wells
were installed north and east ofthe former dispenser island. Wells were constructed of2-inch diameter pVC
well materials and completed at a depth of approximately 20 feet below grade. Static groundwater levels
were measured at approximately 16 feet below grade. Groundwater flow direction was determined to be to
the SSE.
Soil samples were acquired from a depth of 8-12 feet below grade. Although this interval is several feet
above the current water table, this horizon was determined tobe most contaminated based on a previous
investigation conducted by Dr. Bryan Furtek. Therefore, defining the vertical extent of contaminitior*o,
not our objective.
Present data indicate that the petroleum release from the former dispenser soaked downward through the soil
and spread horizontally through the sandy/silty layers sandwiched between the clay-rich layers. fuote: The
lateral spread is signiJicont considering the high concentrations of benzene ond pftnq 1S.OO1 ppm and
1 . 5 4 I ppm, respectively) listed in soil sampled from boring MW-4, located Jifteen feet east of tii formerdispenser island.
Groundwater analytical reports listed concentrations of benzene and,/or MTBE in excess of the Risk Based
Corrective Action (RBCA) Tier I screening levels in groundwater sampled from MW-4, MW-5 (previously
named "GP-X"), and MW-6 (previously named "GP-Y'). Note: MW-5 was the only well in whiih benzene
(0'644 ppm) was listed above the RBCA Tier I standard. MTBE concentrations were listed above the RBCA
Tier I standard in MW-4, MW-s, and MI4r-6.
Data indicate that groundwater is relatively clean compared to the higher concentrations of petroleum
hydrocarbons listed in soil samples from the respective well borings. We conclude that the bulk of
contamination has been "hung-up" in the vadose zone on top of clay-rich layers located several feet above
the present water table. In the context of very limited historical data,betuene in water sampled from Gp-X
(MW-5) has diminished from 2.450 ppm to 0 .644 ppm since March I ,2004 . We recommend implementing
the quarterly groundwater schedule in order to determine if petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations will
continue to diminish in groundwater under natural conditions.
TABLE OF'CONTENTS
EXECUTryE SUMMARY
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. SOIL SAMPLING/WELLINSTALLATIONS
3. GROLTNDWATERMEASUREMENTS
4. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING . . .
5. RESULTS
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Table l. Groundwater Measurements
Table 2. Soil Samples: Summary of Laboratory Analyses
Table 3. Groundwater Samples: Summary of Laboratory Analyses
Appendix A - Illustrations
Appendix B - Soil Boring/Well Installation Logs
Appendix C - Laboratory Chemical Analytical Reports
1
I
2
aJ
4
6
J
4
5
1. INTRODUCTION
Access Environmental Services, Inc. (Access Environmental) has been retained by the premium Oil
Company to install groundwater monitoring wells at the subject property ("site") located at 305 South Main
Street in Richfield, Utah (Figure 1, Appendix A). Wells were installed at the request ofthe Utah Division
of Environmental Response and Remediation DERR in response to the Conective Action plan (CAp)
submitted by Access Environmental on April 21, 2005. The location and number of the well were agreed
upon by Ms. Melissa Turchy, project manager at the DERR, and with Mr. Andy Callister, ,"p....)rtirrg
Premium Oil Company, prior to the installations. In accordance with the US-EPAguidance document, the
new and existing wells will be monitored on a quarterly basis for aperiod of two years after which time, the
site will be evaluated for monitoring/natural attenuation in leu of aggressive site remediation. This approach
was recommended in the referenced CAP report.
A total of three new groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site on July 12,2005. The new
wells were designated MW-3, MW-3A, and MW-4. Environmental soil samples fromthe well borings were
retained for chemical analysis. Upon completion, the new wells along withtwo existing wells M\i-l and
MW-2 and two existing piezometers GP-X (renamed MW-5) and GP-Y (renamed frAW-O; were mapped,
surveyed, gauged, and sampled. Groundwater samples were acquired from the wells and retained for
chemical analysis. Results are presented herein.
2. SOIL SAMPLING/WELL INSTALLATIONS
A total of three new groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site on July 12,2005. Well
positions were selected to the north and east of the point ofrelease, e.g. the former dispenser island, in order
to define the extent of contaminant migration. The new wells were designated MW-3;MW-3A, and MW-4.
Specific well locations are designated in X'igure l, Appendix A). Note: We originally proposedreplacing
the two existing piezometers, GP-X and GP-Ywith the understanding that these piezometers were installed
at a depth of l5 feet below grade which is essentially the depth of the water tobl". Tht replacement wells
were not drilled upon discovering these piezometers were infact installed at a depth of 27feet below grade.
Because the piezometers could be usefulfor groundwater monitoring, the piezometers were renamed MW-S
and Mll'-6, re spectively.
Soil Samples.' Soil samples were acquired from each of the well borings using a Kansas-style ,.mega-
sampler" device. The sampling device was advanced ahead ofthe probe rods, yielding a 1.5 incl diameter,
undisturbed soil sample, across a four-foot interval. Sample drives were acq-uired from each borin g at a
depth of 8-12 feet below grade. Although this interval is several feet above the current water table, this
horizon was determined to be most contaminated based on a previous investigation conducted by Dr. Bryan
Furtek (ref,, Groundwater and Soil Sampling Report, I I/17/00). Data from this investigation (from Gp-X,
located at the east end ofthe former dispenser island) showed petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in soil
diminished with increasing depth to minimal concentrations at a depth olsixteen feet.
Nutive Soil: Soil samples acquired from the borings indicated that native soil consisted predominantly of
silty clay (CL) with interbedded layers of clayey sand or silt (ML). Note: In the sample range of g-12 feet,
the clayey silt/sand layers were mostly wet and the clay-rich layers were moist but not s-aturated. Soil
boring/well installation logs are attached in Appendix B.
I4rell Installation and Bqseline Groundwater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 2
Otganic Vapor Readings: The organic vapor content of the soil samples was measured using a Mini-Rae
organic vapor meter equipped with a photo-ionizatrondetector (OVM-PID). The instrument was intemally
calibrated using a gas standard of known concentration. The instrument was tested before usage to assure
accuracy. Readings were taken by slowly dragging the tip ofthe OVM-PID across the length ofthe samples.
Organic vapor concentrations ranged from <lppm to 1,400 ppm. Discrete readings ate doc.r*ented in the
soil boring/well installation logs (Appendix B).
Well Installation: Wells were installed at a maximum depth of2l feet below grade inside ofa 4"-diameter
boring. Wells were constructed of 2"-diameter PVC well materials which included a 10 foot section of
casing on top of a l0 foot section of 0.01" factory-slotted well screen. The annulus of each boring was filled
with 10/20 silica sand to a level 2 feet above the well screen. The upper portion of the annulus was filled
with bentonite chips ("Crumble") in order to produce an impermeable surface seal. Two of the wells, e.g.
MW-3 and MW-4, were topped with a slip-cap and installed several inches below grade. The void
surrounding the top of each well was filled with sand. One of the new wells, e.g. MW-3A, was completed
at the surface with a flush-mount steel bolted lid set in concrete. Specific soil boring/well installation logs
are attached in Appendix B.
3. GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENTS
On July 12,2005, depth to groundwater was measured relative to the "top of well casings" (TOC) in each
well using an electronic water-level indicator. Depths varied from 15.40 feet (MW-3A) to 17.04 feet (MW-
1) below TOC. Specific measurements are listed in Table l.
3.1 Groundwater Depth and X'low Direction
Groundwater monitoring wells were mapped and the relative elevations of the top of casings (TOCs) were
defined using an engineers level and measuring rod. Results are summarized.inTable 1.
')
Well Installation and Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 3
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF' GROT]NDWATER MEASUREMENTS
7t12t0s
WELL TOTAL
DEPTH (ft)
TOC (Top of Casing)
Relative Elevation (ft)
Groundwater
Depth (from ToC) (ft)
Relative Elevation
of Water Table (ft)
MW-l 20 100.00 t7.04 82.96
MW-2 z0 99.94 16.20 83.74
MW-3 20 100.00 15.50 84.50
MW-3A 2t 99.89 15.40 84.49
MW-4 21 99.58 15.20 84.38
MW-s 20 100.08 15.62 84.46
MW-6 20 100.04 16.07 83.97
Based upon these data, a potentiometric groundwater surface map was generated using the SUMER
computer progfttm (Figure 2, Appendix A). The map shows a gradient sloping to the SSE with a relatively
flat gradient of approximately 1/85 horizontal/vertical ratio between MW-1 and MW-6.
4.0 GROTJNDWATER SAMPLING
Each well was purged of approximately 3 well volumes (e.g. 5 gallons) of water using a disposable plastic
bailer. Note: Several wells were bailed dry after extracting onty 2-3 gallons of water. The same-bailer
(dedicated to the specific well) was utilized to sample groundwater approximately 45 minutes later. Samples
were retained in 40 ml VOC glass bottles capped with Teflon-lined lids. Bottles were completely filled
allowing no headspace. Soil samples were removed directly from the plastic sample sleeves and
immediately packed inside of a 4 oz glass jar and capped with a Teflon-lined lid.
All environmental samples, e.g. soil and groundwater, were sealed, labeled, immediately placed in cold
storage, and transported under chain of custody to Utility Testing Laboratory, an E.P.A. certified and DERR
approved laboratory, for analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH, EPA method 80158 modified),
MTBE and the aromatic hydrocarbons: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and naphthalene (BTEXN;
EPA method 80218). Sample results are presented in Section 5.
Well Installation qnd Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gssoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 4
5. RESULTS
Analyses are documented in the Laboratory Analytical Reports (Appendix C). Soil sample results are
summarized in Table 2. Groundwater sample results are sunmarizedinTable 3.
TABLE 2. SOIL SAMPLES
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
Results in ppm
Note: ppm: mglkg
BOLD: Value exceeds the RBCA Tier I screening levels.
5.1 Soil Sample Analytical Summary
Soil analytical reports listed concentrations of TPH, benzene, naphthalene, and/or MTBE in excess of the
Risk Based Corrective Action (RBCA) Tier I screening levels in samples taken from borings MW-3 and
MW-4 of which MW-3 was the most contaminated. Note: Boring MW-3 is located on the north side of the
former dispenser island. Boring MW-4 is locatedfifteenfeet east of theformer dispenser island given that
boring GP-X (renamed MW-S) is located at the eastern end of the former dispenser island. OVM-PID
readings from soil taken from this borings indicated low concentrations of organic vapors (Appendix B).
In contrast, the chemical analytical report listed elevated concentrations of benzene and naphthalene, e.g.
5.001 ppm and 1.541 ppm, respectively.
Sample
Identity
TPH (ppm)
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzene
(ppm)
Toluene
(ppm)
Ethylbenzene
(ppm)
Total
Xylenes (ppm)
Naphth
(ppm)
MTBE
(ppm)
TIER I Screening Levels; SOIL (used internally by the DERR as an initial clean-up evaluation standard)
TIER I 1,500 0.900 6I 23 235 10 0.300
MW-3 @ 8-10'1,960.00 GRO
605.54DRO
7.236 50.534 15.362 108.000 13.068 1.s65
MW-3 @10-t2'1,970.00 GRO
446.t2DRiO
1.959 7.742 50.846 16.089 107.000 6.885
Mril/-3A @ 8-10'<t0cRo
<10 DRo
<0.100 <0.100 <0.100 <0.300 <0.100 <0.100
MrrI/-4 @ 8-10'769.00GRO
49.02DRO
5.001 12.842 12.59s 60.700 5.251 1.541
l
Well Instqllation qnd Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Stqtion
Richfield, Utah
page 5
TABLE 3. WATER SAMPLES
SUMMARY OF' LABORATORY ANALYSES
Results itt pp-
Note: ppm:mglL
BOLD: Value exceeds the TIER I screening levels.
* TPH = TPH(ero) and TPH(dro)
** Ref. "Report on Additional Soil and GW. . .", Bryan Furtek,4129104
5.2 Groundwater Sample Analytical Summary
Groundwater anaMcal reports listed concentrations of benzene and/or MTBE in excess of the Risk Based
Corrective Action (RBCA) Tier I screening levels in groundwater sampled from MW-4, MW-5 (previously
named .'GP-X"), and MW-6 (previously named .'GP-Y"). Note: MW-5 was the only well in which benzen'e
(0.644 ppm) was listed above the RBCA Tier I standard. MTBE concentrations w€re listed above the RBCA Tier
I standard in Ml4/-4, MW-5, and MW-6.
Sample Date Depth
toGW
*TPH
(ppm)
---------- Aromatic Hydrocarbons ---_-________-_-____
Benzene
(ppm)
Toluene
(ppm)
Etllylbenz
(ppm)
Total
Xylenes
(ppm)
Naphth
(ppm)
MTBE
(ppm)
TIER I Screening Levels; WATER (used internally by the DERR as an initial clean-up evaluation standard)
TIER 1 10 0.300 '1.0 4.0 73.0 0.1 0.2
MW-I 7/t2/05 17.04 <0..50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.006 <0.002 0.1 59
MW-2 7/12/05 16.20 0.59 GRO
<0.50 DRO
0.003 <0.002 0 004 <0.006 0.002 0.010
MW-3 7/12t05 15.50 4.31 GRO
2.08 DRO
0.240 0.263 0.089 0.448 0.024 0.139
MW.3A 7/t2/05 Is.40 0.52 GRO
1.50 DRO
0.019 <0.002 0.006 <0.006 <0.002 <0.004
MW-4 7lt2/0s 15.20 l.SlGRO
<0.5 DRO
0.286 0.1 33 0.070 0.224 0.003 0.867
MW-5
(GP-x)
**311/04 9.52 GRO
2.55 DRO
2.450 0.017 0.330 1.250 <0.010 2.47
7ltzlls 15.62 2.91 GRO
<0.50 DRO
0.644 0.351 0.073 0.399 0.006 1.452
MW-6
(GP-Y)
**3/l/04 <0.50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.006 <0.002 0.401
7/12t05 16.07 <0.50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
0.031 <0.002 0.009 <0.006 <0.002 0.306
I(ell Installation and Baseline Groundyvater Monitoring Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 6
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On July 12,2005, three additional groundwater monitoring wells were installed as a prerequisite for quarterly
groundwater monitoring. In accordance with the US-EPA guidance document, data acquired from at least two
years of groundwater monitoring from these wells will be necessary to determine if monitoring/natural
attenuation (IvINA) may be implemented in leu of aggressive corrective action.
The new wells were installed north and east of the former dispenser island. Wells were constructed of 2-inch
diameter PVC well materials and completed at a depth of approximately 20 feet below grade. Static groundwater
levels were measured at approximately 16 feet below grade. Groundwater flow direction was determined to be
to the SSE.
Soil samples were acquired from a depth of 8-12 feet below grade. Although this interval is several feet above
the current water tabIe, this horizon was determined to be most contaminated based on a previous investigation
conducted by Dr. Bryan Furtek. Therefore, defining the vertical extent of contaminationwss not our objective.
Present data indicate that the petroleum release from the former dispenser soaked downward through the soil and
spread horizontally through the sandy/silty layers sandwiched between the clay-rich layers. Note: The lateral
spread is signiJicant considering the high concentrations of benzene and MTBE (5.001 ppm and 1.541 ppm,
respectively) listed in soil sampledfrom boring MW-4, locatedJifteenfeet east of the former dispenser island.
Groundwater analytical reports listed concentrations of benzene and/or MTBE in excess of the Risk Based
Corrective Action (RBCA) Tier I screening levels in groundwater sampled from MW-4, MW-5 (previously
named "GP-X"), and MW-6 (previously named "GP-Y"). Note: MW-S was the only well in which benzene
(0.644 ppm) was listed above the RBCA Tier I standard. MTBE concentrations were listed above the RBCA Tier
I stondard in MW-4, MW-s, and MW-6.
Data indicate that groundwater is relatively clean compared to the higher concentrations of petroleum
hydrocarbons listed in soil samples from the respective well borings. We conclude that the bulk ofcontamination
has been oohung-up" in the vadose zone on top of clay-rich layers located several feet above the present water
table. In the context of very limited historical data, betuene in water sampled from GP-X (MW-5) has
diminished from2.450 ppm to 0.644 ppm since March 1,2004. We recommend implementing the quarterly
groundwater schedule in order to determine if petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations will continue to diminish
in groundwater under natural conditions.
Sincerely,
Access Services, Inc.
a
Lyle V. Phillips, Ph.D., UST #CC0043
Project Geologist cc Melissa Turchy
i'-)
Appendix A
ILLUSTRATIONS
PREMIUM OIL GAS STATION
305 South Main Street
Richfield, Utah
SITE MAP
Aeeess Enuironmental
Inc.
Figure IApp. Scale: l"= 4O'
Drafted by: LVP
_.4/
t
4lla,i),
ir'
llit\i-\i.
3OC 9outn 7treet
{*
q.!
$L{-
$)r-6
T
6:NAAA4S
vlouse
c=
c3
E]
Ef
9TORE
uris
+
fiw-3A
HW-5
\AYA)
iizpensr
t'lw-6
icP_v)
ol'4w-i
o
YW-2
Pown thop
0
-1,"=40'
LEGEND
Q Yoniioring \,\ieli
* ?tuza-eru,
)]
300 South S
Former
MW-3A
MW-3
+
=-g4.go
10
MW
s3.90
1O
MW-4
83.30
MW-2+Flow
6l$
MW-1
fO
1
100
80.
40.
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 1 00 1 200.00 22a.a0
Figure 2. Potentiometric Groundwater Surface Map (7112105)
Approximate Scale: l ":40'
/
)
Appendix B
SOIL BORING/VtrELL INSTALLATION LOGS
MAP 399 South
MW-S
Fonner diqrenror
N Lgle,Phttlips'
.l-)
o,ot-lam
dkta
r:t
EI
EI
r-t
STORUlt
Site ID Pmmlurn 0ll Gssollne Sftffon
MW-3
Location 3O5 Soufh Mqtn Streer, Rlehfleld, Urah
Drilling Comp ,,., Dheei Push Seruie€s Bie 0eoprile
Total Depth 20 fr Weather Sunns/99 F
gr+{
{oq)n
o,)?
H
({
T)
Eg3
E
Ei
Eu
oo
Access Enuironmerrtal ,
, Inc.
Soil Description Well Installation
Concrete
2
at
ef</l
o
E
os
4
6
-1- Stttg 0tqg {M}l}r.reddish bmurn, rnoderafe plastteffg,
moisfr.
I low pla*tlcifg, molst, soF,
etong petmlelqrn odeF
10
L2
t4
r.6
18
20
22
SUtg Ctag {CL[ reddlch bmwn, modercte plertielfg,
moisf, moderate petmleum oder
Clqseg gtlt {MLl:grqgr. uef, coff, sfong pefrolelurn
odel j
Chg {CUi reddichihmnn, moderafe plestlcifu,
molsf, modersle pefrol€om odel
.V Wqfer Tqble-|S.s0'
,)a
sa.
EE
cl,
cA
6c,
aoslb
e-g.
c,4.
=.9.tt.o
o
4
5,.
6r
d-.g
d'
MW-34
DrillingComp,. Dlrent Puch$eruiees .,Rie 0prpri$e
N Lsh PhilttFg,7lt2/O5
-prdiotr-lJa
dlE{a
Former diepenrer
r]
STONEtt
MW.3A
MAP 899 South
l{'eather Sunng199 F
g
"lja(l)n
H
o(J
Aceess Enuironmer:dgc.lt
trYell Installation
ktt.
Soil Description
6
L
2
L
Grase Surface"'-^".
2
4
(D
!ct
E(ns
6
----r* SIfig ehg {UH}i reddish brouni rnodersfe glaafletfg,
moir$, no pefioleqm.oder. ..
8 Ctqge$'Sffi {MU; gqag, rnf sofr,'mild peholetum,oder.
10
L2
L4
16
18
2A
22
Slttu Ctag {CL}: reddlsh bnnn, moderate.plesttcltg,
molcfi'no pefroleurn g{g1 ,-
9ttt{MLh SrqUr rilBti soft, mtld peholBturn oder
Clqg {€t}r reidi*fl bmunr' moderete placticttg,
mokr, no petmleurn oder
J'c,E6.
ItE6al
go
CJ'(}
c\lo
I Wstel Teble-|S"4o',
soog
o7
7112/05
MW-4
Site ID Premtum Oit Oqgollne Stsfion
Location 9OSSouflr Mairr Streeq,Richfietd Ufah
Drilling,Comp . Dhect Pusfi Servlses Bis 0eoplobe
Total Depth 2l t Weather Sunng/99 F
J
*q
(l)
A
.t)
fttl
({n
ct
O.
O,
b<a
g
o()
A eeegs Erusironmer*al
Irlc.,
Soil Description Well Installation
Concrefe
2 !
q
<4
c)
Eg
oc$
4
6
--*L* Stttg Ctqg.{M}llr', reddtefi , hmwn; moderere. ptasricfrg,
$0let, h0 pofirlerrn odef ..
I
10
L2
L4
16
18
20
22
Sttt {ML}; gng, o€tr soff, rnlld pefrotelum oder
Sttru Chg (cLlr rcddtsh brown, moderare ptacrieffs,
rnol$ ho:pefioleum odbr
I V[qterTshie'15.2}'
LaatA.
atEcr.
cA
a3)
aog\l
b
5-g.
g
dt..rg-
o
o
?:t-€'o-.a
ct'
I )
Appendix C
CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL REPORTS
(TPH; EPA 80158 Modified; BTEXN/IVITBE; EPA 8021)
)
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone (801) 48$8941
Analytical Report
Client:Access Environmental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Proiect:Richfield
Glient Field lD: IUIW-I
Laboratory lD: 07130541 A, B
Analysls: TPH DRQ/GRO
MBTEXN
llatrix: Water
Samplo Recolved Ay: Sabrina Woosley
Date Received:
Date Gollectsd:
Collsctlon Time:
07n3r2005
07t12f2m5
14:00
Repotting Teet ReeultsDate
TPH DRO (C10 to C28l
TPH GRo (G6 to GlO)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Bsnzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
07t13t2005
wn5nw5
07t15t200s
07t15t2005
07115t2005
07t15t2005
07115t2005
07115t2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-s46;021B/sosoB
0.50
0.50
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
< 0.50
< 0.50
0.159
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.006
< 0.002
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmafion not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:20-Jul-05
Becky Laboratory Director
l1-
All analysss porformed in ompliancs wih National Envircnmental Laboratory Accrditalion Conference (NELAC) shndards Page 1 of 1
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. SrtiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone (801) 48$8941
F.glEgtlglgsg,
Cllent:Access Environmental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT. 84094
Project;Richfield
Glient Field lD: IUIW-2
Laboratory lD: 07130m2 A, B
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix Water
Sample Rscslvod By: Sabrina Woosley
Date Received:
Date Gollected:
Gollection Time:
07n3no05
07t't212005
14:30
Repor{ng
Limit
TPH DRO (Gl0to G28)
TPH GRo (COto C10)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Tohl
Naphthalene
07t13t2005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
07n5n005
07115f2005
07tl5t200s
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.s0
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
< 0.50
0.59
0.0{0
0.003
< 0.002
0.004
< 0.006
0.002
2G'Jul{S
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dllution Fac{or Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:
Director
{il, .
All analyseE petformed in comptiance with National Environmontal Laboratory Accreditallon Conference (NE[AC) standards Page 1 of 1
A Utility Testin€ Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Report
Glient:
Date Received:
Datp.Collscbd:
Gollection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT.8409a
Attn: Lyle Phillips
07t13t2005
47na2005
15:30
Prolect:Richfield
Glient Field lD: itl$l-3A
Laboratory lD: 07130S03 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MFTEXNf,latrix Water
Sample Rocoiyed By: Sabrina Woosley
Date Reporting
Limit
TPH DRO(CrotoC28)
TPH GRO {Co to C10l
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphtftalene
07t13t2005
07t't5t2005
07n5no05
07115t2005
07115t2005
07n5r2005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
0.50
0.50
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
r.50
0.52
< 0.004
0.019
< 0.002
0.006
< 0.006
< 0.002
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/s0308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 8qr1B/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
SW-846 Method 80218 se@nd column confrmation not cnnfirmed
Dllulion Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:20-JuF05
Becky Holubek,Direclor
1
1
1
i-
.!d:.
All analysEE p€rformed in compliance wi$ Natlgnal Envionmental Laboratory Accr€dihtion Conf€t€nce (NELAC) standarde Page 1 of 1
A Utility Testing Laboratory
1615 W 2200 S. Suite A
Salt LakE City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: (888)48$8941
Phone (801) 48+8941
Glient:
Date Received:
Date Collecbd:
Gollection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT. 84094
Aftn: Lyle Phillips
07t13t2005
07t12t2005
15:00
Project:Richfield
Glient Field lD: Ml,y€
Laboratory lD: 071305-04 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatri* Water
Sample Recelved By: Sabrina Woosley
Limit
TPH DRO (C10to C28)
TPH GRO (cO to G10|
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphtftalene
07t13t2005
07115t2005
07n5n005
07n5n0w
0711512005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
07n5,nms
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw{46 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw-aao aozrelsosos
0.50
0.50
0.004
0.w2
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
2.08
4.31
0.{39
o.uo
0.263
0.089
0.448
0.024
++Surrogate Recovery outside acceptance limits indicating possible matrix interference* Estimated value, analyte(s) detec{ed above calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not conlirmed
Dilution Fac{or Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:2GJul-05
Becky Holubek,Director
t
&
All analyses perfotmed in complianca with Nafronal Envimnm€ntal Laboraury tr5ss6itation Contc€nce (NELAC) stendads Page 1 of 1
)
A Utilitv, Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
TollFree: (888)48ffi941
Phone (801) 48S.8941
Report
Glient:
Date Received:
Dats Collected:
Collection Time:
Access Environmental
'1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT. 84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
07t13t2005
07t12t2005
16:00
Project:Richfield
Client Field lD: illw4
labontory lD: 071305-05 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Recoly€d By: Sabrina Woosley
Date
Limit
Test
TPH DRO {Cro b c28)
TPH GRO (G6 to G10)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenee, Total
Naphtlnlene
07t1u2005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
07115t200,5
07n5n005
07t't5t2005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
s:v\r-846 80218/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
o.oo2
< 0.50
1.81
0.867
0.286
0.r33
0.070
0.2u
0.003
'* Estimatad value, analyte(s) detected above callbralion range
SW-846 Method 80218 second @tumn confrmation not confmed
Dilution Fador Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:2GJul-05
Becky Holubek,Director
t- '-,
All analyeee performed in complhnce wi0r National Envirunmental Laborabry Accieditation confo€nca (NELAC) shndards page 1 of 1
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw€46 80218/50308
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utrh 84119
Toll Free: (888)485€941
Phone (801) 48S8941
< 0.50
2.C1
1.452
0.644
0.351
0.073
0.399
0.006
_T__ r r rr FarlS0i)462m65
Analytical Report
Glient:Access Environmential
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT. 84094
Project:Richfield
ClientField lD: i,lw-5
Laboratory lD: 07130$06 A, B
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Recolvod By: Sabrina Woosley
Dato Received:
Date Collected:
Gollection Time:
TPH DRO (C10 to c28)
TPH GRO (c0 to Gr0)
Methyl tert butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
07113t2005
07t12t2005
16:30
07t't3t2005
07t15t2005
07t15noo5
07n512005
07n5n005
07t15t2005
07n5no05
o7n5noo5
0.50
0.50
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
" Eslimated value, analyt€(s) detec{ed above calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmafion not confimed
Dllulion Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:20-Jul-05
Becky Holubek, Laboratory Director
t"\"
All anal!'sos p€tformed in complianca wih Natlonal Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Confercnce (NELAC) stendards page 1 of 1
1
1
1
Test
)
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615W.2200S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Client:
Date Received:
Datd Collected:
Gollection Time:
07113t2005
07n2nw5
17:00
Access Environmental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Report
Project:Richfield
GlientFleld lD: MW{
Laboratory lD: 071305{7 A, B
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNlf,atrix Water
Sample Rocelyod By: Sabrina Woosley
TPH DRO (c{Oto c28)
TPH GRo (G6 to C10|
illethyl tert butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphtfralene
07t13t2005
07115t2005
07t15t2005
07n5noos
07115t2005
07t15t2005
07t15t2005
07n5noo5
SW€4680158 Modmed
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw{46 80218/50308
sw-846 80218i50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
< 0.50
< 0.50
0.306
0.031
< 0.002
0.009
< 0.006
< 0.002
> Matrix Spike outside acceptance limits- biased high
** Eslimated value, analyle(s) detec{ed above calibrallon range
SW{46 Method 80218 second column conlirmafion not confmed
Dllutlon Fador Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:20-Jul-05
Becky Director
1
1
1
t
q'=
All analys€s p€rtormed in compliance wih National Envionmental Laboraory 4ss66g1"tion Confet€nca (NELAC) sbndards Page 1 of 1
A Utility, Testing Laboratory
1615W. 2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
TollFree: (888)48S8%1
Phone [phone]
Analytical Report
Client:Proiect:Richfield
Client Field lD: ilIW-3A @ 8-{0'
Laboratory lD: 07130m8
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXN
Matrix Soil
Sample Recelved By: Sabrina Woosley
Access Environrnental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT. 84094
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Gollection Time:
07fi3n005
07n2no05
14:00
Test Resultsilethod
TPH DRO (C10 to C28)
TPH cRO (C0 to G10)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
07119t2005
07t14t2005
07n4n005
07tl42:005
0711412005
07t14t2005
07114t2005
07t14t2005
10.00
10.00
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.300
0.100
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/5030A
sw€46 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw{46 80218/5030A
sw€46 8021B/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846;021B/sosoA
< 10.00
< 10.00
< 0.100
< 0.100
< 0.100
< 0.100
< 0.300
< 0.100
20-Jul45
++
#,<
++
++
++
++
++
< Laboratory Control Splke oubide acceptance llmits- biased low
++sunogate Recovery oulside acceptance llmits indicating poesible matrlx interter€nce
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confrmation not conflrmed
Dilutlon Factor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:++)r'L,.L Date of lssue:
Becky Holubek,Director
*
4.
All analyses perfotmed in complience wilh National Environment€l LaborabryAccr6ditalion Conf€l€nce (NELAC) sbndards
1
1
20
Page 1 of 1
A Utility Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
TollFree: (88S)48ffi941
Phone (801)48S941
Analytical Report
Glient:Access Environnrental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Prcject:Richfield
Glient Fleld lD: fUtt€ @ 8-10'
Laboratory lD: 07130$.09
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrlx Soil
Sample Recelved By: Sabrinq Woosley
Date Received:
Date Gollectad:
Gollection Tlme:
07113t2005
07t12t2005
10:50
Date
TPH DRO (C10 to C28)
TPH GRO (G6 to Gr0)
Methyl tertbutyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naph{halene
07n9n006
07t1412005
07t14t2005
07t14t2005
07114t2005
07t14t2005
CI7t14t2005
07n4noo'
10.00
10.00
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.300
0.100
605.54
1900.00
1.565
7.236
50.534
15.302
108.000
13.068
SW€46 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/5030A
sw-846 8021B/5030A
sw{46 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/50304
#,<
++
< Laboratory Control Spike outside aceptance llmits- biased low
++sunogate Recovery outside acceptanoe limits indicating posslble matrlx interfercnce* Eetimated rralue, analyte{s) detec{ed aboro calibraton range
SWA{6 Method 8021B second column confirmation not confrmed
Dilution Faclor Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:20-Jul-05
Becky Holubek,Director
1
1
20
il
4i.
All analyses p€rformed in compllanca wlh Nauonal Envlronmental Laborabry Accrcditaton Confel€nce (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
A Utilitv Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: [phone]
Phone [phone]
Glient:
DatsReceived:
Date Collected:
Gollection Time:
07t13t2005
07t12t2005
11:00
Access Environmental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
Report
Proiect:Richfield
Glient Field lD: il1w.3 @ 10-12'
Laboratory lD: 071305-10
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNilatrix: Soil
Sample Recelved By: Sabrina Woosley
Method
TPH DRO (Cl0to G28)
TPH GRO (G6 to C10)
ilethyl tert-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
07n9r2m5
07t14t2005
07t14t2005
07t14t2005
07114fr2005
07114t2005
07t14t2005
07114t2005
10.00
10.00
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.300
0.100
1/,8.12
1970.00
1.959
7.742
50.846
16.089
107.000
6.885
SW{4tt 80158 Modified
sw€46 80158/50304
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw€46 80218/5030A
sw-846 8021B/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
++,<
++
++
< Laboratory Control Spike ouFide aceptance limits- biased low
++sunogate Recovery outside acceptance limits indica{ng possible matrix interfercnce*'Esllmaled value, analyte(s) detec{ed above calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dllution Fador Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:Date of lssue:20-JuF05
Becky Holubek,Director
1
1
20
\..
All analyses performod ln complianoe wilh National Envircnmantal Laboratory Accr€ditalion Conference (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
)
A Utilitv,Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
Toll Free: (888)48S8941
Phone (801) /A$8941
Analytical
Client:
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Gollection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E.8725 S.
Sandy, UT.84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
071131200s
07t1u200s
13:00
Proiect:Richfield
Client Fleld lD: IUIW4 @ 8-10'
Laboratory lD: 07130$11
Analysis: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatri* Soil
Samplo Recsived By: Sabrina Woosley
Teat ResultsDate
TPH DRO (Cl0to G28)
TPH GRO (GG to Gr0)
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Bsnzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphtfialene
07t19t2005
07t14t2005
07n4n005
07n4r2005
07t't4t2005
07t14t2005
07n4n005
07t14t2005
SW-846 80158 Modified
sw-846 80158/5030A
sw{46 8021B/5030A
sw€46 80218/5030A
sw€46 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 80218/5030A
sw-846 iOZre6oaOn
10.00
'10.00
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.300
0.100
49.o2
769.00
t.&1
5.001
12.842
12.595
60.700
5.251
> Matrix Spike outside acceptance llmits- blased low
< Laboratory Control Spike outside acceptance limits- biased low
++sunogate Recovery oulside acceptance limits indiaating possible matrix interference** Estlmated value, analyte(s) detected abone calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not oonflmed
Dilution Fac{or Used: GRO
DRO
MBTEXN
Approved by:
1
1
20
Becky Hplubek,Director
l.-,-
'+:
-
All anslyEe6 peformed in compliancewilh National Envlonm€ntal LaborabryAccrditation confersnce (NEl-Ac) standards
Date of lssue:2&Jul-05
Page 1 of 1
r)'C
'7"t)'o\
Date Sampled
1jr*,,fi
?'(L,c/\'
Relinqu ished (signature) :
Relinqu ished (signature) :
Rel inqu ished (signaVre) :
(signature)
It'nn
{t nc
M:<P
2>so
Sample Time
"'"^{"'?VirS!}A
""nwvii$,iltL
1-
Datefime:
Datefime
Datdime:
DatdTime:
(
pt
Sample tdentifrcation / tocation
el^Project
(
,/
V
*f>Lts
COMMENTS:
Received (signatrre)
Received (signature)
Received (signaturc)o
Received (signature)
fufr,ro\rb)&
V
t/
tl
3+
sN
Fa
ts
V
lr
^(s
'F{-'-.
\
I
4
No.
of
cont.
e-mail / Fax
Phone:
2f5
I fl(-fr
J*z
rothe apllEof:
fuuffixj*q
SIND RESUTTS TO (Company Name)
A',{i,w- ng4
5
5
s 4
*t\
coNprTLoN oF SAMPLES
freWChilted: trYes D No
Preservation lndicated: tr Yes trNo
Seals lntact:
fmarks:
EYes DNo
-(o
o?r3rg-n(
REMAR1(s
RePot'ff)'w''ilJ*'
Utility Testing l,aboratory
i 615 W. 2200 s. suite A Salt Lake Utah 84119 Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Relinqu
Sam
as
.o.
:CID
Time
I 0
o
c
I D
OO
t
Rel
(signature):
nquished (signature)
Date/time:Y}
Date/Iime
DateAime:
Datefiime:
ldentification Location
V V
Received (signature)
Received (slgnature)
(signature)
Received (signature)
(At
AeF-,F*l--
No.
of
cont.
T
RESULTS TO (CompanY Namc)
t
I Fax-
Phone:
n-gs:tffi5-_-t;'-
To the otz
o
/b
CONDITIoN OF SAII{PIES
Chilled: trYes tr No
Preservation lndicated: tr Yes tr No
,.4)
lntact:
CI\\
tl Yes tr No
4 \
Utility Testing Laboratory
utah 84119 Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]s W. 2200 S. Suite A Salt Lake
'G-z-,
REMARKS