DERR-2024-012951

j\
A REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF ADDITIONAL SOIL AND GROUND WATER
SAMPLES THAT WERE COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF THE FORMER
LOCATION OF THE NORTHERNMOST DISPENSER ISLAND THAT WAS
REMOVED IN 1998. THE SITE IS THE PREMIUM OIL COMPANY SERVICE
STATION LOCATED AT 305 SOUTH MAIN STREET IN RICHFIELD, UTAH
Facility lD# 2000222 Release Site "EGUP"
Date of Report April 29, 2004 ';i'n,. r.r iT
.''.',nr- , ,- .;iJt
t_ii;l-rii0 & REIi4ED,AI'OIIReport Prepared by
Bryan Furtek
Evergreen Environmental Services
406 East 300 South, #316
Salt lake City, Utah 84111
Phone: (801) 532€865
I,IAY t 0 2004
BY
Background information:
During the time period between October 30, 1997, and January 8, 1998, three underground fuel
storage tanks and two dispenser islands were removed from the site of the former Cashsaver
Service Station located at 305 South Main Street in Richfield, Utah. This work was undertaken
as part of the total reconstruction of the service station.
Map #1 depicts the layout of the cunent service station along with the locations and
identifications of all closure samples in which at least one or more analytes exceeded RBCA
Tier 1 Screening Levels. Such samples were found at the soil locations identified as SS-7 and
SS-9. Soil sample #7 was collected at the westem edge of the former northernmost dispenser
island at a depth of 6.0 feet. Soil sample #9 was collected at the eastern edge of the former
northemmost dispenser island at a depth of 6.0 feet.
Only these two soil samples had constituents that were in excess of the Tier 1 Screening
Levels.
Groundwater was not encountered during the closure process, so all the closure samples were
soilsamples.
Table I presents the analytical results of the two closure soil samples, SS-7 and SS-9, which
contained at least one analyte that exceeded at least one RBCA Tier 1 Screening Level.
Moderate levels of hydrocarbon contamination were found in soil sample SS-7. Two analytes at
SS-7 were in excess of RBCA Tier 1 Screening Levels. They were naphthalene, which wis
found at a concentration of 10.5 parts per million (ppm, mg/Kg), and MTBE. The naphthalene
value was only slightly in excess of the Tier 1 Screening Level of 10.0 ppm. MTBE was
detected at a concentration of 1.20 ppm. The Tier 1 Screening Levelfor MTBE in soil is 0.3
ppm.
r-
r'
r'
('
('
r'
(
Page 2
The only other closure sampling location that showed the presence of contamination in excess
of Tier 1 Screening Levels was at SS-9. ln this case, SS-9 indicated the presence of high levels
of gasoline-based soil contamination. All the analytes in SS-9 were well in excess of their
respective Tier 1 Screening Levels, except for diesel-range TPH, which was not detected at all.
Exceedingly high levels of each of the BTEXN components were identified in the sample, with
the three most RBCA-limited components being found in far excess of their respective Tier 1
Screening Levels.
For example, benzene was detected at4.6 ppm, forwhich the Tier 1 Screening Level is only
0.9 ppm.
ln addition, naphthalene was found at a concentration of 32.0 ppm, in which instance the Tier 1
Screening Level is only 10.0 ppm.
Lastly, the concentration of MTBE was exceedingly high in the sample, with a value of
34.1 ppm. The Tier 1 Screening Levelfor MTBE is only 0.3 ppm.
ln light of the obvious presence of high levels of gasoline contamination at SS-9, about 60 tons
of contaminated soil in and around SS-9 were removed by excavation and disposed at the
Sevier County landfill.
ln light of this issue,_a Ge-oP_robe sampler was used to collect additional subsurface samples in
the former vicinity of SS-9. On November 17,2000, a GeoProbe sampler owned and operated
by Earthprobe, lnc., was used to collect subsurface samples at the location identified a's Gp-t
on the Site Map.
At the location of GP-1, three soil samples were collected from the boring. Soil samples were
collected at depths of 6 to 8 feet, 8 to10 feet, and at 10 to 12 feet. RBCA Tier 1 Screening
Levels were exceeded in the 6 to 8 foot and g to10 foot sampling depths for benzene,
naphthalene, and TPH-gasoline. This data is presented in Table ll.
Analysis of the soil sample that was collected from the interval between 6.0 to 8.0 feet BGS
indicated that the sample contained four analytes that were in moderate excess of their
respective Tier 1 Screening Levels. They were benzene, naphthalene, TPH-gasoline, and
MTBE.
Analysis of the soil sample that was collected from the interval between 8.0 to 10.0 feet BGS
indicated that the sample contained three analytes that were in moderate ex@ss of their
respective Tier 1 Screening Levels. They were benzene, naphthalene, and TPH-gasoline.
MTBE was just slightly less than its Screening Level.
Much time and effort was expended on an attempt to collect a groundwater sample at GP-1 but
it was not possible to do so. Based on the groundwater levels in the four monitoring wells, the
groundwater level at GP-1 was expected to be at a depth of about 9.5 feet. The Geoprobe
groundwater sampler tip was pushed to a total depth of 14.0 feet below the ground surface,
which would have placed the groundwater sampler tip sufficiently deep enough into the aquifer
to collect a representative groundwater sample.
Several attempts over a period of hours were made to collect a groundwater sample with a
peristaltic pump, but were unsuccessful. Attempts were then made at three different locations in
-
r-
('
(
l
(
{
('
('
(
(-
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(.
(
(
(
I
(
(
(
(
(
(
t
{,
(
(
(
t
Page 3
the vicinity of GP-1. The three borings were dry as determined by lowering a tape measure into
the borings. The bottom end of the tape measure was dry after it was withdrawn from the
borings.
It is interesting to note that the static water level (SWL) at the site is at about 8.0 to 10.0 feet
BGS. A stiff clay (CL) layer exists in the interval between 4.5 and 14.5 feet BGS, which means
that the ground water level exists in stiff clay. Stiff clays can be greatly resistive to the passage
of water through it. For example, it would not be unusual for a stiff clay to have a hydrdulic
conductivity as low as 10t cmlsec whereas silt may have a hydraulic conductivity of about 10-5
cm/sec. Waterwould pass through the stiff clay about one thousand times slower than it would
through silt.
Results:
On September 18, 2003, a GeoProbe sampling device was used to collect 6 soil samples from
the location identified as GP-X and four soil samples from the location identified as GF-y on the
Site Mep. The soil samples were collected from depths of 4.0 to 6.0, 6.0 to B.O, g.O to 10.0, 10.0
to 12.0, 12.Oto 14.0, and from 14.0 to 16.0 feet BGS at Gp-X.
A! 9p-f soil samples were collected from depths of 4.0 to 6.0, 6.0 to 8.0, 8.0 to 10.0, and from
10.0 to 12.0 feet BGS.
The soil sample that was collected from a depth of 8.0 to 10.0 feet at GP-X was the only soil
sample that contained at least one analyte that exceeded the RBCA Tier 1 Screening criteria.
Five of the analytes were in modest excess of their respective Tier 1 Screening Levels. These
analytes were benzene, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, TPH-gasoline, and MTBE. The analytical
results of this round of soil sampling is presented in Table lll.
The groundwater collection tip was driven to a total depth of 15.0 feet at each location and an
attempt was made to collect a groundwater sample from each boring with a peristaltic pump.
These attempts did indeed fail.
A 2-inch diameter push rod was used to widen the boring and a 1-inch diameter pVC
piezometer was installed. The interval that extended from 5.0 to 15.0 feet BGS consisted of a
screened region with 0.02-inch slots which was then sunounded with a washed-sand packing,
The intervalfrom the ground surface to 5.0 feet BGS was sealed with a bentonite packing.
The piezometers were allowed to remain undisturbed until March 1,2004, atwhich time the
piezometers were sampled for ground water. ln this case, sufficient ground water was
withdrawn from each of the two piezometers to allow for the complete filling of two 40-ml vials.
The water sample vials were placed on ice and delivered to Utility Testing Laboratory in Salt
Lake City for chemical analysis. The water samples were analyzed for the five aromitic BTEXN
components, totalpetroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline-range, total petroleum hydrocarbons
in the diesel-range, and MTBE.
It should be noted that the identification of the ground water sampling locations that are given on
the analytical reports refer to sampling locations MW-NW and MW-SE.
a
(
('
(
(
(
(
('
{-
I
Page 4
MW-NW is at the same location as GP-X and MW-SE is at the same location of GP-Y.
The ground water analytical results are presented in Table lV.
lnspection of the analytical results from the water sample collected from MW-SE reveals that the
sample exceeds RBCA Tier 1 Screening Levels only for TPH-gasoline, in which case it is found
at a concentration of 401parts per million. The conesponding Screening level is only 10.0 ppm.
lnspection of the analytical results from the water sample collected from MW-NW reveals that
the sample exceeds RBOA Tier 1 screening Levels for two of the analytes.
ln this case, benzene was found at a concentration of 2.450 ppm, whereas its Tier 1 Screening
Level is only 0.300 ppm.
Likewise, MTBE was present at a concentration of 2.470 ppm, whereas its Tier 1 Screening
Level is only 0.200 ppm.
The soil in the vicinity of the former east end of the northemmost dispenser island is not
excessively contaminated. Natural physical and biological processes appear to be reducing
these contaminants at a satisfactorily rate. For instance, the concentration of benzene that-was
present in the soilat a depth of 8.0 to 10.0 feet at GP-1, which is the same location as Gp-X,
dropped from 3.580 ppm in November of 2000 to a concentration of 1.900 ppm in September of
2003. At this degradation rate, the benzene concentration should be approaching 0.9 ppm in
about one more year.
Since the depth of ground water is also usually between 8.0 to 10.0 feet BGS, it is logical to
assume that the concentration of benzene that is dissolved in the ground water at GP-1 (MW-
NW) willalso be subject to a fairly high natural rate of degradation. ln this instance, benzene
must decline from 2.450 ppm to 0.300 ppm over a reasonably short period of time. lf natural
remediation processes appear to be incapable of accomplishing this feat, then it would be a
simple mafter to install one or two air sparge points in the vicinity of GP-1. This method would
strip benzene from the ground water by physical means and the increase in dissolved oxygen
would promote the biological breakdown of benzene by naturally occurring microbes.
Dissolved MTBE can also be treated in a similar fashion.
ln either case, the possible downgradient movement of the benzene-contaminated ground water
away from GP-1 can be monitored by analyzing for the presence of benzene in the ground
water samples collected at MW-SE, which is about 30 feet downgradient from GP-1, and at
MW-1, which is about 1 10 feet downgradient from GP-1. ln this fashion, it can be ensured that
contaminated ground water never moves beyond the release site boundaries.
aaa-aa,-a.^.--vf ,o -1 -1 -\.1t)1111:ll ll
House
Yard
60 Tons of contaminated soil rvere
removed durinng closure of old UST
ss-7 of:_ _ -T_---_.o i ss -g----t---u----Jo Pavement
o
=6'a
GP.1 &
GP-X
t-rg
is
I
oE(9
o
GP-Y
o
r6w-2
Pavement
il
U
S
U
s
T
o
MW.1 Site Map #1PavementI
II
Trash
BinffioFt 25Ft SoFt
lsland
le land
Premium Oil Company
305 S. Main Street
Richfield, Ljtah
Facility lD#2000222
Release Site EGUP
C-Store
to
CLol-o-
c,tF'(E
L.o-
MW-3 is 16'due south of this point \MW4 is 92'due south of this point PfiVatg PfOpefty
N
t
300 South
{-,(l,
6,L.*ro
?-.F
=
-)
j
e C aaaaaaaaaa'--:-- 111-\lf lllllllll
TABLE I
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING THE SITE CLOSURE OF
THE PREMIUM OIL SERVICE STATION IN RICHFIELD, UTAH, IN WHICH THE SOIL SAMPLES
CONTAINED PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION IN EXCESS OF RBCA TIER 1 SCREENING LEVELS,
Release Site EGUP Facility lD# 2OAO222
Samples Gollected on January 8, 1gg8
All Concentrations are in Parts per Million (ppm, mg/Kg)
Location
SS-7
SS-9
Sampling
Date
1t8t98
1t8t98
Soil@ 6.0' BGS
RBCA Tier 1
Screening LevelAnalyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
TPH-gas (C6-C10)
TPH-diesel (C11-C15)
MTBE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
TPH-gas (C6-c10)
TPH-diesel (C11-C15)
MTBE
<0.200
3.700
<0.200
26.7AA
10.500
321.0
<0.200
1.200
44.600
532.000
124.04A
788.000
32.000
3,230.0
<0.200
34.100
0.9
61.0
23.0
235.0
10.0
1,500.0
5,000.0
0.3
0.9
61.0
23.0
235.0
10.0
1,500.0
5,000.0
0.3
l
CICe ae aa aa-r^--c'nnn -a-^)llllll)ll))lf ]
TABLE II
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING A SITE
INVESTIGATION PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 17, 2OOO, AT THE PREMIUM OIL
SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 305 SOUTH MAIN STREET IN RICHFIELD, UTAH
Release Site EGUP Facility lD#2OOO222
Samples collected on November 17, 2000
All Concentrations are in Parts per Million (ppm, mglKg)
Location Analyte
GP-1
Soil@
6.0'-8.0'
Soil@
8.0'-10.0'
Soil@
10.0'-12.0'
RBCA
Tier 1
Screening
Level
0.9
61.0
23.0
235.0
10.0
1,500.0
5,000.0
0.3
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
TPH-gas (C6-C10)
TPH-diesel (C11-C15)
MTBE
3j20
16.100
4.650
159.000
24.500
2,720.0
414.0
0.644
3.580
19.100
5.560
130.000
19.200
2,440.0
477.A
<0.290
<0.090
0.431
0.650
s.880
1.890
167.0
38.2
0.290
TABLE III
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING A SITE
INVESTIGATION PERFORMED ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2003, AT THE PREMIUM OIL
SERVIGE STATION LOCATED AT 305 SOUTH MAIN STREET IN RICHFIELD, UTAH
Release Site EGUP Facility lD# 2000222
Samples collected on September 18, 2003
All Concentrations are in Parts per Million (ppm, mglKg)
Location Analyte
GP-X
(MW-NW)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
TPH-sas (c6-C10)
TPHdiesel (C11-C15)
MTBE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
TPH-gas (c6-C10)
TPHdiesel (C11-C15)
MTBE
GP-Y
(MW-SE)
<0.003
<0.005
0.010
oJ20
0.027
7.4A
0.09
0.010
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.70
<0.05
<0.005
<0.002
0.012
0.093
0.740
0.120
27.0A
0.61
0.043
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
0.011
<0.005
2.10
0.065
<0.005
1.900
53.000
29.000
190.000
10.000
1,600.00
36.00
0.380
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
3.70
0.18
0.008
Soil@
4.0'-6.0'
Soil@
6.0'-8.0'
Soil@
8.0'-10.0'
Soil@
10.0'-12.0'
0.006
0.390
0.480
1.700
4.270
28.00
0.62
o.477
<0.003
<0.005
0.007
0.060
0.083
7.70
0.1s
<0.005
Soil@
12.o',-14.0'
<0.003
0.043
0120
0.950
0.111
12.00
0.2s
0.008
Soil@
14.0'-16.0'
<0.003
<0.005
<0.005
0.025
<0.005
19.00
1.10
0.008
RBGA
Tier 1
Screening
Level
0.9
61.0
23.0
235.0
10.0
1,500.0
5,000.0
0.3
0.9
61.0
23.0
235.0
10.0
1,500.0
5,000.0
0.3
aaaaaaaaaa-,?---a,^
TABLE IV
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE
TWO PIEZOMETERS THAT WERE INSTALLED ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2003, AT THE
PREMIUM OIL SERVICE STATION LOCATED AT 305 SOUTH MAIN STREET IN RICHFIELD, UTAH
Release Site EGUP Facility lD#2OOO222
Samples collected on March 1,2004
All Concentrations are in Parts per Million (ppm, mg/Kg)
Location Analyte
MW.NW
(GP-R
Ground Water
RBCA Tier 1
Screening Level
0.3
7.0
4.0
73.0
0.1
10.0
10.0
4.2
0.3
7.0
4.O
73.0
0.1
10.0
10.0
0.2
MW-SE
(GP-Y)
2.450
0.017
0,330
1.250
<0.010
9.52
2.55
2.470
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.006
<0.002
401.00
<0.50
<0.002
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
TPH-gas (C6-C10)
TPH-diesel C10-C28)
MTBE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
Naphthalene
TPH-gas (C6-C10)
TPH-diesel C10-C28)
MTBE
I
xlpuoddy
From: AWAL To: Eryan Furtek
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Oate: '10/8/2003 Time: 6:15:50 PM
(
ORGANIC-ANALYSIS REP ORT
Page3ofl2
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utalt
841 l5
L:b Sample ID: L57166-0lA
Field Sample ID: GP-X @ 4.0-6.01
SiteID: Rictrfield Cash Saver
Analytical Results
Clienr: Iterniurn Oil Co.
Collected: September I 8, 2003
Receivod: September 24, 20A3
Aaalysis Reguested: SW8260B/5030A
Contact: BryanFr.rtek
Analyzed: September 25,2003
8260.S-MBTEXN/TPH
Units= m/kg{ry
FinalDilutionFacror 2.46
Comporurd Limit
Reporting
7r-136
'7(.t25
81-122
85-r23
0.0049
0.0@5
0.0049
0.0049
0.004,9
0.004.9
0.049
0.o+9
o/o Moisture: 19
Anal$icai
Result
llS t/o
100 %
104 Vo
98.0 %
0.0099
< 0.0025
<0.0M9
0.010
0.12
0.027
7.4
0.090
(80r) 263-8686
loll Frec (88E) 263-8686
Fax [phone]?
nail : [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Offlrccr
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4Brornofluorobcnzcne
Surr: Dibromofluoromethanc
Sun: Toluene-d8
Methyl tert-butyl ethcr
Benzene
Toluene
Ethrvlbcnzeuo
Xylene, Total
Napbthalene
TPH C5o CtO (cRo)
TPHCIl toCls (DRO)
Released by:
oratory Supervisor ReportDatc October8,2fr,t3
f'
(
(
(
(.
(
(
r
Fromi AWAL To: Bryan Furtek
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Date: 10/8/2003 Ttme:6:15:50 PM
ORGA}TiC ANALYSIS FGPORT
Page 4 of 12
(
{
Clienf hemir.un Oil Co.
Collected: Sepienrber 18, 2003
Received: Sepranber 24, 20A3
Analysis Requested: SW82608/5030A
Contact: BryanFrutek
Anallzed: September 24,20A3
8260-S.MBTE)C.{/TPH
(
(
I
(
(
463 West 3500 Soufi
Salt Lake City, Utah
841 l5
Lab Sample ID: L57165-02A
FieldSanpleID: cP-X@ 6.0-8.0'
Site ID: Richfield Cash Saver
Analytical Results
UniE= ndkg-dry
Final Dilution Factor
Comporurd
2.34
o/o Moisturet 2l
Analytical
R€s-uh(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
\
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(.
(
(.
(
(.
(.
(
(80r) 263-8686
loll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
nail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Ofticcr
Sun: 1,2-Dichlomctbane-d4
Surn 4-Bromofl uorobcnzenc
Surr: Dibromofl uorometlanc
Surc Tolueue-d8
Metbyl tert-butyi etber
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbcnzcnc
Xyleue, Total
Naphthalene
lPH C6 to C10 (GRO)
TPHCI I toCl5 (DRO)
Reporting
Umit
7t-t36
76-125
81-122
85-r23
0.0047
0.0023
0.0047
0.0047
0.0@7
0.0c47
a.u'l
0.047
101 Vi
100 %
102 %
104 Yo
0,043
< 0.0023
0.0r2
0.093
0.74
0.12
27
0.61
Released by:
Supervisor RcportDatc:Octobcr 8, 2003
or €ontsct Thir corpany accepts nc Flponslbiity eicept for the due peflormanc€ of insp€ction and/or analysls in good hjh a||d accordlng to ho rles of thr lada anci of siience.
a
r'
i
('
(.
(
(
{'
r-'
r-'
(-
(
(
(
(
From: AWAL To: Bryan Furtek
AMERICAN
WEST
,{,NALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Date: '10/82003 lime: 6:15:50 PM
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Page 5 of l2
463 Wcst 3600 South
Satr Lake City, Utah
84t 15
Oienr: kemiumoitco.
Collecte& September 18, 2003
Reu'eived; September 24, 20A3
Analysis Requested: SW8260B/5030A
lab Sample ID: L57166-03A
Field Sarnple ID: GP-X @ 8.0-10.0'
Site ID: Ricbfield Cash Sav'er
AnalXtical Results
Contact: Bryan Furtek
fuiallzed: Sepiember 26,2403
8260-S-MBTEXN/TPH
*
*
*
(
(
(
(.
(
{
(
(
(
(
(
(
I
t
q
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
[phone]
loll Frcc [phone]
Fax [phone]
nail : [e-mail]
Kyle F- Cross
Laboratory Director
Peggr McNicol
QA Officer
Units= m/kg-dy
Final Dilutioo Facor 50
Compor:nd
Sun: I 3-Dichloroethane-d4
Su:r: zl-Bromofl uorobcnzene
Sur: Dibromofl uorometbale
Surr: Tolueoe-d8
Metbyl tert.butyl ether
Benzoue
Toluene
Ethylbenzcne
Xylenc, Total
Naphthalcnc
TPH C6 to ClO (GRo)
TPHCIr toCl5 (DRO)
Reporting
Timii
7l-136
76-125
8l-rn
85-123
0.10
0,050
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.10
1,0
1.0
7o Moisturez 24
Analyticat
Result
lg3 Vo
98,4 0/o
101 %
10s %
0.38
1.9
53
29
190
l0
1:600
36
Thc samplc rcquired a methanol cxtraction.
Sample was rcceivcd witb headspacc.
* Thcse analytcs were obtained from a I:1,000 dilutiou.
Rcleased by:
Supcwisor Rcport Datc:Octobcr 8, ?003
(.
t
?romiAwAL To: Bryan Furtek
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAEORATORIES
Dat6: l0/8/2003 Trme:5:15:50 PMr-'
ORGANIC AbIALYSIS REPORT
Page 6 of 12
453 West 3600 South
Salt Lake Ciry, Utah
841l5
Client: Prmium Oil Co.
Collected: September 1 B, 2003
Received: September 24, 2003
Analysis Requested SW8250B/5030A
Iab Sarrple ID: L57166-MA
FieldSampleiD: GP-X @ 10.0-12.01
Site ID: Richfield Cash Saver
Analytical Resulls
Contact Bryan Furtek
Anallzed Septerrber 24,2403
8260-S-MBTE)O{/TPH
(8ol) 263-8586
loll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]?
nail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Units = mdkgdry
FinaiDilutionFectoc 2.48
Compourd
Srul: t,2-Dicbloroethane-d4
Surc tl-Bromofl uorobenzeue
Surr: Dibromofl uoromethare
Sun: Tolucnc-d8
Meibyl tert-butyl ether
Benzeoe
'I'olueue
Etbylbcnzenc
Xylene, Total
Naphtbaleoe
TPH C5 to Clo (GRO)
TPH Cl l to C15 (DRO)
Reporting
Umit
7t-135
76-t25
81-122
85-123
0.m50
0.0q25
0.m50
0.m50
0.019
0.0050
0.050
0.0s0
7o Moisturez 27
Analytical
Result
103 %
fi0.
101 %
TQ7 %
0.0?7
0.00s9
0.39
0.48
L.7
4.21
28
0.62
*
Sample was rcceivcd with hcadspacc.
* This aoalytc was obtahed from a l:9,62 dilutiou.
Released by:G) z
uKrr^tirv supervisoi
-
R pon Du,r, ocober 8, 2003
(
(
(
i.
From:'nWAL To: Eryan Furtek
a 15:50fl\
ORGA}IIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Date:'10/8r'2003 Tirne: 8:Page 7 of 12
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABOR,ITORIETi
Client Pre.nrium Oil Co.
Collected: September I 8, 2003
Received: September 24, 2003
Arulysis Requested: SW8260B/5030A
Contacr: BryanFwiek
Analyzed: Septcmber 26, 2003
8260-S.MBTEXN/TPII
463 West 3600 South
Salr Lake Cify, Utait
84t 15
kb Sample ID: L57166-05A
Field SampleID: GP-X @ 12.0-14.0'
Site ID: Richfield Cash Saver
Anall.tical Resrrlts
f
(-
("
{''
(-'
r'
(
('
r'
f
('
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
{
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
t
(
(
(
t
t
(
(..
t,
(.
(,
(
t.
(,
Units= me/kg+y
Final Dilution Factor:
Compound
Reporting
. Limil
7r-136
7Gr25
81-122
85-123
0.0049
0.m25
0.m49
0.m49
0.m49
0.0049
0.049
0,049
7o Moisture: 16
Axalytical
Rcsult
107 Y"
98.6 o/o
Llz%
103 %
0.0076
< 0.0025
0.043
0,12
0.9s
0.11
L2
0.25
2.45
(80r) 253-8686
loll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
nai I : [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Dircctor
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Surr: 1,2-Dicblomethanc-d4
Sun: 4'Bromofluorobcnzeoe
Surr: Dibromofl uoromethane
Sun: Toluenc-d8
Metbyl tert-butyi ether
Benzcnc
Tolucue
Etbylbcnzcnc
Xyleue, Total
Naphthaicnc
TPH C6 to ClO (cRO)
TPHCII io Cl5 (DRO)
Rclcascd by:
Supervisor ReportDatc;October 8, 2003
0n conbct Thls company acceFt! no respongbiliv 3xc€pt
'6
tha du. porlbrmance of lnsp€clion and.lor sndyJis h good bllh and acording b ths rulc! ot th! trade and of sciance.
From: .ltnlRt To: Bryan Fuftek
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Date: '!0/E/4103 Time: 6:15;50 PagsEofl2
('
(
(
(
(
(
(
{-
{
ORGA}{IC A}{ALYSIS REP ORT
(
Client kemium Oil C0.
Collected: Septenrber 18, 2003
RecEive* Sepiember 24, 20Q3
Analysis Requested: SW8260B/5030A
Conlact: Bryao Furtek
An:alyzed: September 25,2W3
8260-S.MBTEXN/TPH
Lab Sample ID: L57166-06A
Field Sample ID: GP-X @ 14.0-16.0f
Site ID: Richfield Cash Saver
Analytical Results
rt63 West 3600 South
Salt Lale Ciry, Utah
841 15
[phone]
'oll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
nail: awa.l@owal-Labs,com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboraiory Director
Peggr McNicol
QA Officer
Unils= m/kg-dry
Final DhxionFacton 2.5
Conn:ound
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorocthanc-d4
Surc 4-Brornofl uorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofl uoromethane
Sun: Toiucncd8
Methyl tcrt-buryl ether
Benzcoc
Toluene
E.hylbenzcnc
Xylene, Total
Naphtbalcne
TPH C6 toClO(cRO)
TPHCll to Ct5 (DRO)
Reporting
Limit
o/o Moisnre:
Analytical
Result
\04 %
98,6 0/o
101 04
105 %
0.0078
< 0.0025
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
0.025
< 0.0050
t9
l.t
l9
(
71-135
76-125
8l-122
85-123
0.0050
0.002s
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0050
0.050
(
(
(
(
(
Released byr
Supcrvisor RcportDatc:October 8, 2003
(
From: AyryAL To: Bryan Furtek
I
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Date: 10i8/2003 Tlme: 8:'15:50 PM PageIofl2
ORGA}IIC ANALYSIS REPOM
453 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
841 15
I ab Sample ID: L57166-07A
Field &rnple ID: GP-Y @ 4.0-6.0'
Site ID: Richfield Cash Saver
Analytical Results
Client Premium0il Co.
Collect€d: September 18, 2003
Received: Seprernber 24, 2003
Analysis Reqr:ested: SW8260B/5030A
Contact: Bryan Frutek
Analped Sepiember 25,2003
8260-S-MBTDC.[/TPH
Units= mgtkgdry
Final Dilution Factoc
Compound
2.54 Reponing
Limit
7o Moisture: 19
Analytical
Result
103 %
99.0 o/o
L00 Yo
t04.
< 0.0051
<0.0025
< 0.0051
< 00051
<0.0051
< 0.0051
0.70
< 0.051
(80r) 263-8686
loll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
nail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Sur: 1,2-Dicbloroethane-d4
Sun: 4Broorofluorobclzcnc
Surr: Dibromofluoromstbase
Surn Totuene-d8
Methyl tert.buryl cther
Bcnzcne
Tolueae
Ethylbeozone
Xylcne, Total
Naphtbalene
TPH C6 to ClO (GRO)
TPHCII toCl5 (DRO)
7l-136
7f.ras
8l-t?2
85-r23
0.0051
0.0025
0.0051
0.0051
0.0051
0.0051
0.05i
0.051
Released by:
Supcrvisor ReportDate:October 8, 2r)03
All analydc spplicabte to he CWA, SolM Nrd RCRA ro pcrlormed ln accordancc b NELAc prot@ls. P.nincntsemCing infom.tion i3loc.t d on th. atbched O,ifnS.CSL[i. nlt
on contaa Thir company accegb no responslblllty exept lor the du6 psrformanca of inlprcdon rndbr analysi8 h good faith and aooording to $e rules of th€ tade and of Gencs,
I
r-
r-
r'
f
('
("
(
r'
r'
r-
('
('
{'
(
r
(
(
Erom:A\ryAL To: ervan Funekt
I
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORJES
oate: 1018/2003 Time:6:15:50 PM
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Page 10 of I 2
,163 West 3600 South
Satt Lake City, Utah
841 l5
Lab Sampte ID: L57166-08A
Field Sample ID: GP-Y @ 6.0-8.0'
Site ID: Richfeld Cash Saver
Analytical Results
Clieot hemium Oil Co.
Colleoed: September 18, 2003
Received: September 24, 2003
A:ralysis Requested SW8260B/5030A
Contact: BryanFulek
Anralped: September25,2003
8260.S-MBTEXN/TPH
[phone]
bll Free [phone]
Fax (801) 263-E687
nail: awa@awal-Labs. com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officcr
RAorting
Limit_
7l-136
76t25
8l-122
8s-123
0.0051
0,0026
0.0051
0.0051
0.0051
0.0051
0.051
0.051
o/o Moisture: 22
Aninlyticai
Result
LA4%
100 %
LOt%
103 o/o
< 0.0051
< 0.0026
< 0.0051
< 0.0051
0,01r
< 0.0051
2.L
0.065
Units= mg&g-dry
Final Dilution Factor:
Compsuud
2.56
Sun: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Sur: 4-Brom'rfluorobsnzcnc
Surr: Dibromofl uoromcthanc
Surr: TolucnedS
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Bcnzcnc
Toluene
Ethylbenzenc
Xylene, Total
Naphtbalene
lPHC6 !o ClO(cRO)
T?HCl1to Cl5 @RO)
Sample was rcccivcd with hcad.spaco.
Released by:
Supcrvisor RcportDare:Ocober 8, 2003
Alanalysb apgllcable to the Cw r sD\ A and RGRA srs p€rlbrm€d in rcrd.rFr to NEI C pro{oc.ls. Pff0nentsarplirq hbfinatbn b toc.t d on h. rtr$cd Cnli$.Erlltd. *"
0n conbcl Thl! company accepb no r$ponsibi[ty etcept for lhe due p€fonnanc. of irupecffon and/or analysl8 h good faih and according to lhe rules ot he trddc and qf dirnca.
a-
('
(
l
i
I
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
\
i
05/03/2004 lZ!41 FAI S0l ?63 U6U7 AMERICAN WES'I' LAtsS
QRGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
rgl 004
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
L,{.BORATORIES
CXient Prenrfimoil Co.
Collocted: Sepbmber I 8, 2003
Received: Sepbmber 24, 2003
Analysis Rcquesbil SW8260B/5030A
Contact: Bryan Furtek
Analped Scpterrber2s, 2003
8260.S-MBTE}GI/TPE463 West 3600 Soutb
Sslt L6ke City, Utab
8'+1 l5
I$ Sample ID: L5?166-09A
Field Sample ID: GP-Y @ 8.0-10.0'
Sit€ ID: Ric.hfioldCash Savcr
Anal5rfical Results
Uuis= mg/kgdry
FinalDihnionFac'tor 2.48
Cooound finit
Reeortine
7t-135
76t23
8l-122
85.123
0.00fl)
0.005
0.0050
0.0050
0.0050
0.00s
0.050
0.0s0
7o Moishrret 23
ADalyticat
Rcsult
r03 %
99.2Vo
r0l %
tO2a/o
0,0082
< 0.0025
< 0.0050
< 0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
3"7
0.18
(80l) 253-E686
Toll Free (888) 253.8,686
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kylc F. Gross
Labratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officcr
Sur 1,2-Dicbloroetbaae-d4
Surr 4-Brauofluorobenzeoe
Surc Dforomofluoromelbme
Surr: Tolueoed8
Methyl tert-butyl etber
Bcuzcac
Tolucne
Ethylbeazeue
Xyleoc, Total
Napbtbaleue
TPHC6to C10(cRO)
TPI{Cl1toCl5 pRO)
Sarnplc was rcceivcd wirh bcadspacc.
Rclcascd by:
Loboratory Suparvisor Report Datc: Octob€r g, 2003
on conbrt Thlr com9atry accsptr no l6sFonElullty a(ept lorlhe dug plrlbmanc. of inrpscuon and/o. snslFl! ln 9€d fith rnd accodtng b th. rul€ oihc Uads and arsdienoe.
r-'
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
('
{'
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(.
(
(.
'
05/ud/zuus lz:41 l.A-t dul zuJ 6uu/AMUKIUAN }Y!;S'T' LABS rgl 005
A Q]R-GANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAI{
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Clieof, hemiumOil Co.
Collccte& Sepumber 18, 2003
Received: September 24, 2043
Analltis Requeste& SW8260B/5030A
Contact BryanFurtek
Analfe September2s, 2003
8260-S-MBTD C.{/TPE463 West 36@ South
Sslt Lake Cify, Utalt
t4l 15
Iab Sanple ID; L5?166-10A
Field SarpleID: GP-Y@ 10.0-12.0'
Site ID: Richfield Cash Savcr
Anatydcel R€sulis
UniE: nglkg-dry
Final Dihtion Fagtor: 2.49
9orcpcund
Rc,pdting
T irnii
7t-tx
7&125
8t-t22
8il23
0.0050
0.0025
0.0050
0.00s0
0.0050
0.0050
0,050
0.050
o/o Moisture:
Amlytical
Result
L04 0/:
100%
100 %
105 %
<0.0050
<0.@25
< 0.0050
0.0065
0-060
0.083
0.r5
19
(801) 253-E686
Toll Frcc (6EE) 263-t686
Fo< (801) 263'8687
e-mail: awal@awal-Labs,com
Kyle F- Gross
Laborarcry Dlrector
Peggr McNicol
QA Officcr
Surr: 1 J-Di chlcroc6aucd4
SuE 4-Bromofl uorob'r "'oe
Surr Dibroo0uoroncthsle
Surc Toluonpd8
Metlyl tert-bufyl ethcr
Belzeue
Tolucnc
Ethylbcnzcne
Xyiene, Total
Napbthalc,lre
I?IIC5 to C10 (GRO)
T?IICll toCl5 (DRO)
Releascd by:
Rcport Datc:Ocober 8,2003
..f;'
crienr PX E slL
Address Qoo{ 9o
$Le
fiIEMCAN
SEST
ANALYTICAL
LA8o*AflrXm8
40lWgt36e0$rlt
6rltIdECny'Util
till15
CHAIN OF
CASTODY
(E0r) 261-86M
(E8E) 263{686
Itar (801) 263-86Fr
Lssample set* E 7l Q.Q-
eaee- - I d t
aJt
ca
N'oo
t\9
gt
(o
n1
x
a
N
CDgt
o
o)o
-.t
trl
C)
z
Ita.l
F
t!
Ut
{
cnv
pnwe FSQ- 68-6r rax ?69 -o Lt
Sampler Nane F-'*_6 K+*"sn*
Contacl T7 pvart 'Fug-TEk
ProJect Natrc , Il tu{I-lpLn - f,ishrs&Vq!
Pr$ect Number/P.O.#_
I
6lele 4
Qlrde One:TAT Ioct 2+3
2
2
3 5 dry
3+
s
4
)
Spacial lnsbuctlons:
No
Cj
Lab lD
G'p-o'
v
e
I
G
I
G -X
I o: fd
o-6.
lo-*'I o
+,o -{-o
T'o(,g
oo
o
E
tr
!l
llto
GP-
Ge. K
cP* r
,o
Sample lD
6tl'
€ lA_a'- l€,,o
.o/
a-
€,o' - 8,o t,o
,
t
5
.x
o
0
I
I
f;d
bb
0
oEln
coo
b
g
E5z
v
I
I
\
tva
sbo
3
o
=bo
I
I
r)f
a
il
!D
+
)
I
x
ts
t-
\
1
)c
o
$
Itt
I
F
t
E
c
{
\
a-b
x
o
ln
!
t
-{S
,,tt
T.,'dt
dl.{pr
rJ{:\iti
F
COMMENTS
2 Uilrolen
Pecl(q0o
Y
9
Y
rlA
Y
Oots
Sflr?h l.bebmd
Recsf?I
floles'
TABORATORYU8E ONLY
il
flr
il
onil
aril.uqr6ffi;
Itlodeg v
g TerDpeEfrre
Reeoiyed Brok6o/Lr*hg
$tnroeodrsm),Votasr v
o4FBtvereceq
,Yorb&'
sl'lpFd
,!,orosr
tr
IAIIIE
FVAP LT
Pn0rr
R.elYed By:
PRINTNAME
Rtilnquhftcd By
Tlrl6
Dab
Tlrha
Dalo
Ff
PRINT I{A}E
Tlme NAUE
PRINT}IAI'E
Btf
llrp
Itno
A Utility Testing Laboratory
1615 W.2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake CitY, Utah 84119
Phone [phone]
r-'
r'
('
('
(
(
(
(
r'
{'
('
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
{
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
i
(
L
(
{
(,
(
(
(
Fax [phone]
Analytical Re port
Client:
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Collection Time:
TPH GRO (C6 to C10)
TPH DRO (C10 to C28)
Methyl tert-butYl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
Evergreen Environmental
Attn: Brian L. Furtek
406 E.300 s. #316
Salt Lake CitY, UT 84111
Project:
Client Field lD:
Laboratory lD:
Analysis:
Matrix:
Sample Received BY
Richfield Cashsaver
MW- "SE"
03-02-04-05 B, A
TPH (GRO & DRO)
MBTEXN
Water
Drew Spencer
3t2t04
311104
14:00
318104
3t9104
3t8lo4
318lo4
3t8104
3t8104
3t8to4
318lo4
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80158
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
401
< 0.50
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.006
< 0.002
pH > 2.0
*" Estimated value, analyte(s) detected above calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not conflrmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO 1
DRO 1
MBTEXN 1
Date of lssue:18-Mar-04
Approved bY:
Tina MaY,Director
lt
+^
Parameter Date
Ana
Reporting
Limit Limit
Test
All analyses performed in compliance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation conference (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
(t
A Utility Testing Laboratory
1615 W. 2200 S. Suite A
Salt Lake CitY, Utah 84119
Phone [phone]
(
(
(
(
(
(
{
Fax [phone]
Glient:Evergreen Environmental
Attn: Brian L. Furtek
406 E. 300 s. #316
Salt Lake CitY, UT 84111
Analytical ReP ort
Project Richfield Cashsaver
Client Field lD: MVV'"NW"
Laboratory lD: 03-02-04-06 B
Analysis: TPH (GRO & DRO)
MBTEXN
Matrix: Water
Sample Received BY: Drew SPencer
{'
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
I
(
(
(
(
(
l
(
Date Received:
Date Collected:
Collection Time:
TPH GRO (c6 to C10)
TPH DRO (C10 to C28)
Methyl tert-butYl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
3t2l04
3t1t04
14:25
3t9104
319104
319104
319104
3l9to4
319lo4
3t9l04
3tslo4
9.52
2.55
2.47 **
2.45 **
0.017
0.330
1.250
< 0.010
sw-846 80158/50308
sw-846 80158
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
sw-846 80218/50308
0.50
0.50
0.010
0,010
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.010
pH > 2.0
** Estimated value, analyte(s) detected above calibration range
SW-846 Method 80218 second column confirmation not confirmed
Dilution Factor Used: GRO 1
DRO 1
MBTEXN 5
Approved bY:
Date of lssue 18-Mar-04
Tina May, Laboratory
.-1F<u-
Repo
Limitmeter Limit
est
All analyses performed in compliance with National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation conference (NELAC) standards Page 1 of 1
Reli ngu.ished (signaf trrei
Relinqu ished (signature!:
Reli nqu ished (si gnature) :
fiw- Ult^fi,L
g-i- d{-
Date Sernpted
P.O. Nqrnber:
Profect Number:
+Utilitv Testing Laboratory qAMPI F RF(^(^IRN/ ANAI VqIq RFr}I IFqT
40West Lodse Alenue Salt l-ake City, Utah 8{1 15 Pkcne 801-485-8941 FAX: l0t.:l84-92!l
J\tl
SvOo
Sarnple fime
Llzter?ime:
Date;Time:
DalaiTirne:
DxetTime:
{tjo4 J:oc 9^.
r'"rw -"A/ov"
,,nw-nsF q
Sarnpte ldentjfication / Location
fud-L. WA
5adfpler's Signiture:
f{cHf/EcD arep5X/ER
Project Narne:
Received (signaturel
Receited (signatui-ej
Recei'.e<i {si Sn:i:Jre}
Recei
f
Y
t&E
Analys
F
x
3g-r
f
X
t{Jq
s
:-rnail ,.'63x
'&3'rtz-GEdg
Acdrss:W&6" To?s. )fi3/6
To ihe atlenticn of:
,WGFW FPvt4o*tngutAL
SEND flf5utl5 fO (Corryeoy ttlamel
BftA^i L. fvtr€k
e
2
l.eo-
ot
ccnt
Report To (printt:
W.x;u fV@
r.tD
Fluo
Matrix
CONDITION Of SAMPTES
Sarnples Chitled: g./ut tr No
5eals lntact:SYes DNo
Frsserration lsdicated: E'{es fl No
Rernar&s:
i
REMARKS
hed (signarure!: