DERR-2024-012950

Enairo mental Serai ces, Inc.
1217 East 8725 South, Sandy, Utah g4094
DOWN.GRADIENT WELL INSTALLATION
AND SAMPLE REPORT
PREMIUM OIL GASOLINE STATION
FACILITY I.D.: # 2000222, SITE EGUP
305 SOUTH MAIN STREET
RICHT'IELD, UTAH
JUI\-E 29,2009 :t"'.lr.o-di
:i"':'.j, :!'
PREPARED FOR:
DE
MR. ANDY CALLISTER
PREMIUM OIL COMPANY
2OO5 SOUTH 3O() WEST
SALT LAKE CrTY, UTAH 84115
PREPARED BY:
ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1217 EAST 8725 SOUTH
SANDY, UTAH
RECE'VED
r, JU;IJ 3. f3.,i:ii')tl
tnuironmeniaf
fi esponse &
SEANNFD
7"1tofu+
Phone & FAX (801) s61-827e
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. SOIL SAMPLING/WELL INSTALLATION
3. GROUNDWATERSAMPLING
4. RESULTS
5. CONCLUSIONS
Table 1. Groundwater Samples: Summary of Laboratory Analyses
Appendix A - Illustrations
Appendix B - Soil BoringAMell Installation Log
Appendix C - Laboratory Chemical Analytical Report
f-\
1
1
2
4
6
5
r'
1. INTRODUCTION
Access Environmental Services, Inc. (Access Environmental) has been retained by the premium Oil
Company to install one down-gradient groundwater monitoring well at the subject property ("site") located
at 305 South Main Street in Richfield, Utah (Figure 1, Appendix A). This well was installed in response
to a letter dated June l, 2009 from Ms. Melissa Turchy, project manager at the Utah Division of
Environmental Response and Remediation DERR. The well was drilled on the adjacent property located
south of the site in order to define the furthest extent of the dissolved plume. The location of the well
(designated MW-A) is illustrated in Figure 1, Appendix A.
Upon completion, the newwell was mapped, gauged, and sampled. The groundwater sample acquired from
the well was also retained for chemical analysis. Results are presented herein.
2. SOIL SAMPLING/WELL INSTALLATION
The new groundwater monitoring well (designated MW-A) was installed on June 10, 2009. The well was
drilled approximately 70 feet south ofthe site properfy and approximately 85 feet down-gradient of MW-l,
the oodown-gradient" onsite well. The relative locations of the wells are illustrated in Figure l, Appendix
A. Because MTBE has historically been listed in water samples from MW-l, an additional well was
requested in order to define the maximum extent of the dissolved plume.
Soil Samples.' Soil samples were acquired from each of the well borings using a Kansas-style oomega-
sampler" device. The sampling device was advanced ahead of the probe rods, yielding a 1.5 inch diameter,
undisturbed soil sample, across a five-foot interval. Continuous sample drives were acquired from the boring
from a depth of 10 to 20 feet below grade. The soil samples showed no apparent signs of petroleum
hydrocarbon contamination.
Native,Soil.' Soil samples acquired from the borings indicated that native soil consisted predominantly of
silty clay MH) with interbedded layers of clayey sand or silt (ML). A soil boring/well installation log is
attached in Appendix B.
lYell Installation: The well was installed at a maximum depth of 23 feet below grade. The well was
constructed of 2"-diameter PVC well materials which included 13 feet of well casing and a 10 foot section
of 0.01 " factory-slotted well screen. The annulus of each boring was filled with I 0/20 silica sand to a level
2feef above the well screen. The upper portion of the annulus was filled with sand mixed with bentonite
chips ("Crumble") in order to produce an impermeable surface seal. The well was completed at the surface
with a flush-mount steel bolted lid set in concrete. The soil boring/well installation log is attached in
Appendix B.
Gr oundw ater Monitoring Well Installation/Sampl ing Rep ort
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 2
3.0 GROT'NDWATER SAMPLING
Before sampling, the depth-to-groundwater was measured at a depth of 13 feet in the well (relative to the
top-of-casing or "TOC"). The well was purged of approximately 3 well volumes (e.g. 5 gallons) of water
using a disposable plastic bailer. The same bailer was utilized to sample groundwater approximately 30
minutes later. The groundwater sample was retained in 40 ml VOC glass bottles, capped with Teflon-lined
lids. The bottle was completely filled allowing no headspace.
The groundwater sample was sealed, labeled, immediately placed in cold storage, and transported under
chain of custody to Utility Testing Laboratory, an E.P.A. certified and DERR approved laboratory, for
analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH, EPA method 8015B modified), MTBE and the aromatic
hydrocarbons: benzene, tolueneo ethylbenzene, xylenes, and naphthalene (BTEXN; EPA method 32608).
Sample results are presented in Section 4.
4. RESULTS
The Chemical Laboratory Analytical Report is attached in (Appendix C) and summarized in Table 1
TABLE 1. WATER SAMPLES
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
Results in ppm
Note: ppm =mglL
The chemical analytical report listed petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations below the instrumental detection
limits.
<0.002<0.002<0.006<0.002<0.002<0.002<0.50 GRO
<0.50 DRO
13.006nat09MW-A
0.20.573.04.07.00.300l0TIER I
TIER I Screening Levelsl WATER (used by the DERR as an inltial clean-up evaluation standard)
MTBE
(ppm)
Naphth
(ppm)
Total
Xylenes
(ppm)
Ethylbenz
(ppm)
Toluene
(ppm)
Benzene
(ppm)
*TPH
(ppm)
Depth
toGW
DateSample
ID
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation/Sampling Report
Premium Oil Gasoline Station
Richfield, Utah
page 3
5. CONCLUSIONS
The new groundwater monitoring well (designated MW-A) was installed on June 10, 2009. The well was drilled
approximately 70 feet south ofthe site property and approximately 85 feet down-gradient of MW-l, the "down-
gradient" onsite well. Because MTBE has historically been listed in water samples from MW-l, an additional
well was requested in order to define the maximum extent of the dissolved plume.
The well was installed at a maximum depth of 23 feet below grade. The well was constructed of 2"-diameter PVC
well materials which included 13 feet of well casing and a 10 foot section of 0.01" factory-slotted well screen.
The well was completed at the surface with a flush-mount steel bolted lid set in concrete.
The well was subsequently mapped, gauged, purged, and sampled. The chemical analytical report listed
petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations below the instrumental detection limits. These results indicate that the
dissolved plume terminates between MW-l and MW-A. Therefore, the maximum extent of the plume has been
defined.
The next scheduled semi-annual groundwater monitoring event is scheduled for October 2009 per the semi-
annual groundwater monitoring agreement. The new well (MW-A) will be measured and sampled in addition
to the other designated wells.
Sincerely,
Access Environmental Services, Inc,
Lyle V. Phillips, Ph.D., UST #CC0043
Project Geologist
cc Melissa Turchy
Appendix A
ILLUSTRATIONS
PREMIUM OIL GAS STATION
305 South Main Street
Richfield, Utah
Aeeess Erusironmental
Inc.
SITE MAP App. Scale: 1"=40t
Drafted by: LYP Figure 1
3OO 9outh *reef rY
-t-
a)$L{-$
f-6
T
ro$$il
{$f
ct$(R
-->
l'1w-Ae
l'-4O'
o
LE6END
Q Xonlfor'lng Well
4 ?'uto*.r.,
9torage thea
Pown thop
thop
HouEe
9TOEE
USts
c= (6P_x)
!.AV-]
o
tr3
-+
dlapensr
Former
F,itl, E
c3
c=
o*o
t-
{,+-o
I
I
I
MW-3 I
I
L
0t
6
rll
r.,1w-6
(6r')-1,
o
r4w-2
E
I
I
FNV-7
o
Appendix B
SOIL BORING/WELL INSTALLATION LOG
--Dirt Surface
2 €
ococ-t
4 o
o
om
6
8
t0
12
L4
L6
L8
20
22
--1- Sittg Ctag (Mlll: reddtsh bmwn, moderqre plastictfg,
moist, no peholeum oder
V Wqter Tqble-|3'
I
[_ Ctageg Siltg (ML]: reddish bmwn, tow ptasftcilg, soft,
very moict, h0 peholeum oder
.sa(,g
A-
E
atstoo!=
c/l()
c\l
Terrnlnal at 29'
Ceegg Enutronmental
Well InstallationSoil Description
A
Inc.
dx5
o
C)
€
+ro
o)n
Weather Sunng,U5 FTotal Depth 29 f
Rig GeopmbeDrilling Comp Dheet Push Services
Location 305 Soutfi Metn Sneet, Riehffet4 Utqh
Site ID Premium 0ll Gssoline Stqtion
MW.A
6/to/a9Lsle Phillipc
MAP' Boo South
.MW-A
EI
EI
ET
EI
-uq)o
'.€a
G'
H
N
STORE
Appendix C
CFIEMICAL ANALYTICAL REPORT
(TPH; EPA 80158 Modified; BTEXNAvITBE; EPA 82608)
A utility Testing Laboratory
Analytical Report
1615 W. 2200 S. SuiteA
Salt Lake Gig, Utah 84119
Toll Free: (888)485€941
Phone (801) 485€941
Gllent:
Date Received;
Date Collected:
Collection Time:
Access Environmental
1217 E.872s S-
Sandy, UT 84094
Attn: Lyle Phillips
06/1 1/2009
06/10/2009
13;00
ProJect:Richfield
Cllent Fleld lD: MW-A
Laboratory lD: 061109-02A, B
Analysls: TPH DRO/GRO
MBTEXNMatrix: Water
Sample Recetved By: Becky Holubek
MethodDate Reportlng Test
TPH DRO (cl0 to c28)
TPH GRO (CO to C10)
Methyl tsrt-butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Naphthalene
pH>2
Dilution Factor Used:
06/15/2009
06/16/2009
06/16/2009
06/16/2009
06116/2009
06/16/2009
06/1612009
06/10/2009
SW{46 80158 Modifed
sw-846 82608/50308
sw-846 82608/50308
sw446 82608/50308
sw{46 82608/50308
sw-846 82608/50308
sw-846 82608/50308
sw{46 82608/50308
0.50
0.50
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.002
< 0.50
< 0.50
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.002
< 0.006
< 0.002
GRO
DRO
MBTE)$
1
1
2
&t*"a'{*l-"t<k-
Dlgltally slgned by Becky
Holubek
DNr cn=Becky Holubek o=Uttltty
Testlng Lab ou,
emall=[e-mail], FUS
Dater 2009.06.19 104116 {6'00'Approved by:Date of lssue:19-Jun-09
Becky Holubek, Laboratory Director
All analysos pertumod h comdancs $h Natonal ENiDnmonlal Laborahry Acccdlffion Conbrs{Eo (NELAC) standan s Page 1 of 1
R€port
\
REMARTS
o( -ll-q-c:L
coNDrIoN oF SAMPLES
Preservation lndicaEd: tI Yes B No
OO i L4-'Remarks:
Fto tr No
Il Yes tr No
Samples Chilled:
Seals lntaqt:
v
Matrix
hJ4
No.
of
cont.
Ld
EGF
t/
-SEND RESUTTS TO (Company Name)
fuag Fnrsi>"tnkt4?,(
To the attentiorrd:
4,f ilr*qpt
^oo*"lnn E *7x<
*mail / Fax:
Fv
.q\tr
l/
*)
A-
F.
Datqflirne:
t-g'l\-cl\l, zeo^
Datefime
Date/Tirne:
Datefiime:
Received (signature)
b^1,*'l:a*
Received (signature)
Received (signature)
Received (signatrre)
Projea Name:
/ tociSonSample ldentiFcalion
\\:?va,^
Datefime:
\! '\\-t\
Dab/time:
Datey'Time:
Datefime:
/:oo
Sample Time
i/tb/
Utilitv Testing Laboratory SAMPLE RECORD/ ANALYSIS REQUEST
Utah 841191515 W. 2200S. Suite A Salt Lake Phone: 801485+!)41 FAX: 8Ot-467-0065
nerryup*[snature):
hll#tillan.-
nAinquiiteO (slsnat rref-
Relirquished {signatu re}:
Reli nquished {signature):
COMMENTS: