DDW-2024-014284

Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
11006 Delineation WhAEM Check
4 messages
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:05 AM
To: Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>
Hi Noah,
I was hoping you could help me check the source protection zone modeling done for Kanarraville Town Well #3. I have
asked the consultant to take into consideration the fault boundary because it was mentioned that it was likely a barrier to
flow in the DWSP plan for the other well adjacent to Town Well #3. We went back and forth repeatedly over this issue,
because the model outputs don't match the zones he's showing on his final figures. It appears they have truncated the
zones at the fault boundary. The consultant has indicated that a flow boundary has been added to the model, but the
zones look identical when compared between the one done by simply truncating the zones, and the one done with the
fault acting as a barrier to groundwater flow. Could you try to build the model using the aquifer information contained
within the attached DWSP plan and include a fault boundary? I don't believe well interference was modeled.
No huge rush, but if you could fit it in sometime in the next few weeks, that would be great!
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.
11006 - WS004 - SPP (1).pdf
9029K
Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:16 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Below is what I modeled for zone 4 using the info provided in the plan. One shows the fault acting as a barrier to flow and
the other is without.
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 Delineation WhAEM Check
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2051456502266367747&simpl=msg-a:r769900652445713…1/5
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 Delineation WhAEM Check
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2051456502266367747&simpl=msg-a:r769900652445713…2/5
Noah Zorsky, PG
Environmental Scientist II | Division of Drinking Water | Source Protection
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
M: [phone]
[e-mail]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 1:05 PM
To: Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>
Wow, that was fast. Thanks! So do you think they have actually used the model outputs to delineate their zones or fudged
them on the east side? From what I can tell, it seems they have fudged them. I'm not sure I buy their zones 2 or 3. Could
you also send me screenshots of those?
[Quoted text hidden]
--
[Quoted text hidden]
Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 1:42 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
There are definitely discrepancies but the zones do seem pretty close. Their zones four and three are more extensive.
The zone twos look pretty identical. Maybe they freehanded some of it, but overall theirs looks more conservative
compared to what is being output on our model. What are your thoughts?
Zone 3
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 Delineation WhAEM Check
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2051456502266367747&simpl=msg-a:r769900652445713…3/5
Zone 2
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 Delineation WhAEM Check
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2051456502266367747&simpl=msg-a:r769900652445713…4/5
Noah Zorsky, PG
Environmental Scientist II | Division of Drinking Water | Source Protection
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
M: [phone]
[e-mail]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
[Quoted text hidden]
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 Delineation WhAEM Check
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-2051456502266367747&simpl=msg-a:r769900652445713…5/5
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
11006 - WS004 - SPP
7 messages
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 11:00 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Hey Deidre,

I’ve updated the zones and did the mapping using Whaem Instructions Guide you sent me on “No Flow Boundaries”. I did
the no flow boundary and specified pathlines ever 1 year and it’s not affecting the zones, so it leads me to believe there
isn’t a significant effect on the flow patterns. Hopefully it’s correct time. If not, we will take another stab at it until we get it
right.

Thank you for your patience.

Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

11006 - WS004 - SPP.pdf
9029K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 9:38 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
I'll take a look and let you know. I'm not sure you've captured the no flow boundary correctly, because again your WhAEM
flow paths are crossing the fault, assuming the ones in the appendix are the most recent ones. If it has been done
correctly, the flow paths should go right next to but not, cross the no flow boundary.
[Quoted text hidden]
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…1/10
--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.
image001.png
10K
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 2:38 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Ok, thanks. If I don’t get it right this time, I will ask someone from our Sandy office to help out. I appreciate your time and
effort.
Sincerely,
Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, November 4, 2024 9:39 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006 - WS004 - SPP

12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…2/10
I'll take a look and let you know. I'm not sure you've captured the no flow boundary correctly, because again your WhAEM
flow paths are crossing the fault, assuming the ones in the appendix are the most recent ones. If it has been done
correctly, the flow paths should go right next to but not, cross the no flow boundary.

On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 11:01 AM Bryce Ross <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hey Deidre,

I’ve updated the zones and did the mapping using Whaem Instructions Guide you sent me on “No Flow Boundaries”. I
did the no flow boundary and specified pathlines ever 1 year and it’s not affecting the zones, so it leads me to believe
there isn’t a significant effect on the flow patterns. Hopefully it’s correct time. If not, we will take another stab at it until
we get it right.

Thank you for your patience.

Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…3/10
[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:59 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>
Hey Bryce,
Noah modeled the zones for this source using the data provided in the plan and added the fault as a no-flow boundary.
We would expect to see something similar to this, as far as the WhAEM output screenshots for zone 4. See below:
Yours looks like this:
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…4/10
What Noah modeled for zones 2 and 3 are very similar to yours. I think the no flow boundary is primarily affecting the
extent of zone 4.
I feel fine with you using the extents depicted on Noah's screenshot to update Zone 4 in your mapping, or you're welcome
to send the information along to your Sandy office, if you would like to have them model it.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Deidre
[Quoted text hidden]
--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
[Quoted text hidden]
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 10:35 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Awesome, thank you SO much. I will keep the SPP updated and back to you asap.

Have a great day.

Sincerely,
Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…5/10
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:00 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006 - WS004 - SPP

Hey Bryce,

Noah modeled the zones for this source using the data provided in the plan and added the fault as a no-flow boundary.
We would expect to see something similar to this, as far as the WhAEM output screenshots for zone 4. See below:

Yours looks like this:

12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…6/10
[Quoted text hidden]

[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…7/10

Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.

[Quoted text hidden]
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 3:12 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Hey Deidre,

Here is the SPP with the 15-year model updated. Thanks again, I really appreciate it. If you see any other revisions that
need addressed, please let me know.

Have a great evening.

Sincerely,
Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:00 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006 - WS004 - SPP

Hey Bryce,
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…8/10

Noah modeled the zones for this source using the data provided in the plan and added the fault as a no-flow boundary.
We would expect to see something similar to this, as far as the WhAEM output screenshots for zone 4. See below:

Yours looks like this:

[Quoted text hidden]

12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:1814540294477725…9/10
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov

Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.

[Quoted text hidden]
11006 - WS004 -SPP.pdf
12491K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:18 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Got it, thanks. There shouldn't be any other issues, but if there are, I'll let you know.
[Quoted text hidden]
12/13/24, 8:42 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006 - WS004 - SPP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1814540294477725641&simpl=msg-f:181454029447772…10/10
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
11006-WS004-SSP
23 messages
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 1:51 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Hey Deidre,

Please see the attached Source Protection Plan. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out anytime.

We appreciate your time and effort.

Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy it.

11006-WS004-SPP.pdf
7555K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:52 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jennifer Yee <[e-mail]>
Received; thank you. I have logged this DWSP plan into our review queue. Source protection staff will reach out with any
questions upon review.
Jen, please remove the dormant SP07 deficiency from the system's IPS report while this report is pending review.
Deidre
[Quoted text hidden]
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…1/16
--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.
Jennifer Yee <[e-mail]>Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:26 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
I have removed the deficiency from the water system's IPS report. Please continue to check the IPS report
at waterlink.utah.gov to make sure everything is correct.
Thanks,
Jen
Jennifer Yee
Environmental Scientist | Division of Drinking Water
M: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
[phone]
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.
[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:08 PM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Hi Bryce,
I've reviewed the latest Delineation Report (Section 2.0). I see that the zones have been truncated at the contact with the
Hurricane Fault to address my prior comments. Truncating the zones at the Hurricane fault causes a decrease in the
aquifer area that supplies water to the well. The more appropriate methodology for dealing with the Hurricane fault is to
model the fault as a no-flow boundary in WhAEM. It doesn't appear that the modeling included a no-flow boundary or it
wasn't described in the plan. Can you please confirm?
I haven't reviewed the other sections of the report since they hinge on the delineation report.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Deidre
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 1:52 PM Bryce Ross <[e-mail]> wrote:
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…2/16
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
image001.png
10K
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 8:49 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Hey Deidre,

Thanks for your email. Yes that is correct, it was modeled as a non-flow boundary. If you have any other questions,
please let me know.
[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 8:57 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Then you need to include that information in the report since it isn't clear.
[Quoted text hidden]
image001.png
10K
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:15 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Ok, I will update the report and send it back to you today.

Thanks again,
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy it.
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…3/16

--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov

Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.

[Quoted text hidden]
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 1:07 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Hey Deidre,

I’ve updated section 2.0 of the report and attached it to this email. If you have any additional questions, please don’t
hesitate to contact me anytime.

I appreciate your time and effort thus far.

Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…4/16
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 8:57 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006-WS004-SSP

Then you need to include that information in the report since it isn't clear.

[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy it.

--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…5/16

Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.

[Quoted text hidden]
11006 - WS004 - SPP.pdf
4320K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 7:50 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Received, thank you. I will let you know if I have any further questions.
[Quoted text hidden]
image001.png
10K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:34 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Hi,
I don't see an updated Table 4 in this document. There was a one-page table with all landowners in past submissions.
Can you please add this? If you want me to insert it into the PDF you already sent, I can do that rather than submitting an
entire plan again.
[Quoted text hidden]
image001.png
10K
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:45 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…6/16
Hey Deidre,

I apologize but I’ve since added it to this report. If you need anything else, please let me know.
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
11006 - WS004 - SPP.pdf
8920K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:51 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Thanks!
[Quoted text hidden]
image001.png
10K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:28 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
I hate to bring this up again, but the screenshots in the appendix don't indicate that a no-flow boundary was modeled. The
particle tracks are crossing the Hurricane Fault. Also, it appears that the extent of the zones is the same between this
submission and the last, except for the truncation at the Hurricane Fault. That doesn't make sense since the available
area to the aquifer would have to expand to the north and to the west to accommodate the same pumping rate as before.
Please update the delineation to address this issue.
[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:15 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Hi Bryce,
I haven't received a response on my last email. Are you still working on this?
[Quoted text hidden]
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 10:05 AM
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…7/16
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Hey Deidre,
Thanks for following up. Yes, sorry for the delay. I’ve updated the screenshots in the appendix. Could you give me
further clarification on:
“Also, it appears that the extent of the zones is the same between this submission and the last, except for the truncation
at the Hurricane Fault. That doesn't make sense since the available area to the aquifer would have to expand to the north
and to the west to accommodate the same pumping rate as before.”

I’ve spent a lot of time researching but haven’t been able to figure out how to address that issue.

I appreciate your time.

Sincerely,
Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 8:16 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006-WS004-SSP

Hi Bryce,

I haven't received a response on my last email. Are you still working on this?

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:28 AM Deidre Beck <[e-mail]> wrote:
I hate to bring this up again, but the screenshots in the appendix don't indicate that a no-flow boundary was modeled.
The particle tracks are crossing the Hurricane Fault. Also, it appears that the extent of the zones is the same between
this submission and the last, except for the truncation at the Hurricane Fault. That doesn't make sense since the
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…8/16
available area to the aquifer would have to expand to the north and to the west to accommodate the same pumping
rate as before.

Please update the delineation to address this issue.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:51 AM Deidre Beck <[e-mail]> wrote:
Thanks!

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:47 AM Bryce Ross <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hey Deidre,

I apologize but I’ve since added it to this report. If you need anything else, please let me know.

Sincerely,
Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 11:35 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Cc: Curtis Nielson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006-WS004-SSP

Hi,

I don't see an updated Table 4 in this document. There was a one-page table with all landowners in past
submissions. Can you please add this? If you want me to insert it into the PDF you already sent, I can do that
rather than submitting an entire plan again.

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 1:08 PM Bryce Ross <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hey Deidre,

12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:1785020220565329…9/16
I’ve updated section 2.0 of the report and attached it to this email. If you have any additional questions, please
don’t hesitate to contact me anytime.

I appreciate your time and effort thus far.

Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy it.
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 10:11 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Do you have any way of demonstrating that a no-flow boundary was modeled? The zones shouldn't touch the actual
boundary of the geologic feature like you're showing. See an example below of what they generally look like when done
properly. I've also attached the guide that shows how to add a no flow boundary to WhAEM.
[Quoted text hidden]
2 attachments
image001.png
10K
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:178502022056532…10/16
work_whaem_june2018 (1).pdf
12278K
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 10:25 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Ok, thanks Deidre. I will start working through this information & have the report back to you by next week.

I appreciate your time!
Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 10:12 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006-WS004-SSP

Do you have any way of demonstrating that a no-flow boundary was modeled? The zones shouldn't touch the actual
boundary of the geologic feature like you're showing. See an example below of what they generally look like when done
properly. I've also attached the guide that shows how to add a no flow boundary to WhAEM.

12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:178502022056532…11/16

[Quoted text hidden]
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 3:29 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
I was hoping to have this back to you last Friday. I found someone in our Richfield office that is going to help me with
modeling, so I should have it back to you by this Friday.
Thanks for your patience.

Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 10:12 AM
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:178502022056532…12/16
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006-WS004-SSP

Do you have any way of demonstrating that a no-flow boundary was modeled? The zones shouldn't touch the actual
boundary of the geologic feature like you're showing. See an example below of what they generally look like when done
properly. I've also attached the guide that shows how to add a no flow boundary to WhAEM.

[Quoted text hidden]
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:47 AM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
I was hoping to get this revised SPP today. Travis Gadd in my Richfield office has been helping me with it and has been
working through the Whaem mapping guide you sent me. I know he was working through it this morning but I’m still
waiting to hear back from him.
Thanks for your patience.

Sincerely,
Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:178502022056532…13/16

From: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 10:12 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: 11006-WS004-SSP

Do you have any way of demonstrating that a no-flow boundary was modeled? The zones shouldn't touch the actual
boundary of the geologic feature like you're showing. See an example below of what they generally look like when done
properly. I've also attached the guide that shows how to add a no flow boundary to WhAEM.

[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:09 AM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
Okay, thanks for the update.
[Quoted text hidden]
2 attachments
image001.png
10K
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:178502022056532…14/16
image002.png
36K
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:17 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Hey Deidre,

Travis was researching this system and source. He said it appears there was a previous plan that was submitted and
approved. If this plan was submitted by our office, can you please send me a copy? If I need to submit a Grama request,
I can do that.

I appreciate your time and effort.
Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The content of this e-mail is confidential and proprietary privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy it.
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:00 PM
To: Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>
I’m not sure what you mean. The DWSP plan for 11006 WS004 has never been approved or concurred with. Hence the
back and forth between you and I. A PER was concurred with back in 2020.
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:178502022056532…15/16
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2024, at 12:17 PM, Bryce Ross <[e-mail]> wrote:
Hey Deidre,

Travis was researching this system and source. He said it appears there was a previous plan that was
submitted and approved. If this plan was submitted by our office, can you please send me a copy? If I
need to submit a Grama request, I can do that.

I appreciate your time and effort.
Sincerely,

Bryce Ross | CAD Designer
Main 435.865.1453 | Cell 435.704.1438
[e-mail] | ensignutah.com
<image001.png>
[Quoted text hidden]
Bryce Ross <[e-mail]>Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:11 PM
To: Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Thanks Deidre, I was confused as well when he mentioned it.
[Quoted text hidden]
12/13/24, 8:43 AM State of Utah Mail - 11006-WS004-SSP
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=c26a5d4cc7&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785020220565329209&simpl=msg-f:178502022056532…16/16