DAQ-2024-011641

1

DAQC-1147-24
Site ID 11796 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – STAKER PARSON COMPANIES (dba WESTERN ROCK
PRODUCTS) – Big Water

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Bushman, Environmental Scientist

DATE: November 14, 2024

SUBJECT: Sources: One (1) 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant Baghouse
Contact: Chris Rose: 385-400-2119
Location: 0.5 miles north of Highway 89 on Ethan Allen Street, Big
Water, UT
Test Contractor: TETCO
Permit/AO#: Approval Order (AO) DAQE-AN0117960008-07, dated
July 26, 2007
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated October 18, 2024
On October 23, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for one 400 TPH Parallel
Flow Asphalt Plant Baghouse at Big Water, Kane County, UT. Testing was performed September 24,
2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in conditions 20, 22, and 26 of AO
DAQE-AN0117960008-07. The calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test
Method Pollutant Tester
Results
DAQ
Results Limits
400 TPH
Parallel Flow
Asphalt Plant
Baghouse
September 24,
2024 5/202 PM10 0.0077 gr/dscf 0.0077
gr/dscf
0.024
gr/dscf

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The stack test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: The emissions from the 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant
Baghouse should be considered to have been in compliance with
the emission limits of AO DAQE-AN0117960008-07 during
testing.

ATTACHMENTS: DAQ stack test review excel spreadsheets; Staker Parson
Companies stack test report.
Source Information
Division of Air Quality
Compliance Demonstration
Source Information
Company Name Staker Parson dba Western Rock Products - Big Water - One (1) 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant Baghouse
Company Contact:Chris Rose
Contact Phone No.385-400-2119
Source Designation:One (1) 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant Baghouse
Test & Review Dates
Test Date: 9/24/24-9/25/24
Review Date: 11/14/2024 Tabs Are Shown
Observer:None
Reviewer:Paul Bushman
Particulate Emission Limits
lbs/MMBtu lbs/hr gr/dscf
0.024
Emission Rates - "Front Half"
lbs/MMBtu lbs/hr gr/dscf
0.0077
Test Information
Equivalent Diameter (ft.)As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)Dn
3.34 11.38 0.9860 1.471 0.84 25.85 -0.82 0.2532
Contractor Information
Contracting Company:
Contact:
Phone No.:
Project No.:
10540
Rectangular
10100
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
F factor usedF factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Anthrocite 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
COAL
OIL
GAS
Bituminous 2
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
O2
CO2
lbs/MMBtu
Page 1
Run 1
Staker Parson dba Western Rock Products - Big Water - One (1) 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant BaghouseFlow & Moisture Test Date 9/24/24-9/25/24
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
11.38 25.85 -0.82 25.79 257 3.00 13.90 83.10 29.04 27.52
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 2.6872
0.9860 0.84 55.470 155.70 85.64 45.961 7.329 0.1375 0.9990 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
0.977 70.50 30,539 48,126 1.58E+06 25 0.2532 62.5 2.50 1.948000
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf)dl "p"dl "h"ts F tm F (in)tm F (out)Imp. Liquid Collected
1 182.952 1.90 3.47 248 73 73 Wt. (Final)Wt. (Initial)lc
2 186.930 2.20 4.02 253 73 73 490.6 371.2 119.4
3 188.880 1.30 2.54 254 75 73 561.5 542.9 18.6
4 191.585 1.10 2.15 254 76 74 635.0 627.7 7.3
5 194.050 1.30 2.54 250 77 74 942.8 932.4 10.4
6 196.689 1.40 2.74 250 81 76 0.0
7 199.450 1.30 2.54 251 82 77
8 202.045 0.90 1.76 252 84 77 Isokinetics 90.9
9 204.235 0.85 1.66 253 85 78 Test Date 9/24/24-9/25/24
10 206.430 0.98 1.91 254 87 80 Start Time 12:50 enter
11 208.785 1.25 2.44 252 90 82 End Time 13:57
12 211.370 1.30 2.54 259 90 82
13 213.990 1.20 2.34 260 92 83
14 216.390 0.75 1.46 258 93 84
15 218.525 0.57 1.11 258 94 84
16 220.212 1.20 2.34 260 95 86
17 222.735 1.10 2.14 261 95 86
18 225.190 1.15 2.24 263 96 87
19 227.650 0.70 1.36 263 97 87
20 229.380 0.43 0.84 262 98 88
21 230.891 0.60 1.17 263 98 89
22 232.660 0.66 1.29 264 98 90
23 234.520 0.55 1.07 264 99 90
24 236.120 0.31 0.60 264 99 91
25 237.340 0.22 0.43 260 99 92
26 238.422
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 2
Run 2
Staker Parson dba Western Rock Products - Big Water - One (1) 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant BaghouseFlow & Moisture Test Date 5/13/2009
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
11.38 25.85 -0.82 25.79 269 3.00 13.80 83.20 29.03 27.62
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.2789
0.9860 0.84 61.734 157.20 95 50.348 7.399 0.1281 0.9990 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
1.025 74.46 31,738 50,835 1.66E+06 25 0.2532 62.5 2.50 2.33
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf)dl "p"dl "h"ts F tm F (in)tm F (out)Imp. Liquid Collected
1 238.860 2.00 4.21 250.0 86.0 84.0 Wt. (Final)Wt. (Initial)lc
2 242.250 2.00 4.21 256.0 86.0 86.0 489.80 376.30 113.5
3 245.900 1.70 3.58 263.0 89.0 86.0 643.10 621.00 22.1
4 248.900 1.20 2.53 265.0 90.0 86.0 611.80 604.50 7.3
5 251.565 1.30 2.74 267.0 92.0 87.0 865.00 850.70 14.3
6 254.363 1.90 4.00 274.0 95.0 88.0 0.0
7 257.330 1.05 2.18 273.0 97.0 88.0
8 259.950 1.00 2.07 272.0 99.0 89.0 Isokinetics 94.8
9 262.370 1.05 2.18 273.0 101.0 90.0 Test Date 9/24/24-9/25/24
10 264.960 1.30 2.70 279.0 101.0 91.0 Start Time 14:41
11 267.720 1.50 3.12 281.0 104.0 92.0 End Time 17:36
12 270.640 1.50 3.12 281.0 104.0 92.0
13 273.560 1.30 2.70 281.0 106.0 93.0
14 276.140 0.95 1.97 279.0 107.0 94.0
15 278.430 0.68 1.41 277.0 108.0 95.0
16 280.438 1.25 2.60 271.0 106.0 95.0
17 283.100 1.20 2.49 272.0 107.0 95.0
18 285.800 1.30 2.70 274.0 107.0 95.0
19 288.240 0.75 1.56 274.0 108.0 96.0
20 290.335 0.61 1.27 274.0 108.0 96.0
21 292.174 0.70 1.45 275.0 106.0 96.0
22 294.300 0.84 1.74 276.0 107.0 97.0
23 296.831 0.28 0.58 276.0 107.0 97.0
24 298.430 0.30 0.62 227.0 79.0 79.0
25 299.700 0.22 0.46 234.0 80.0 80.0
26 300.594
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 3
Run 3
Staker Parson dba Western Rock Products - Big Water - One (1) 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant BaghouseFlow & Moisture Test Date 5/13/2009
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg. Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
11.38 25.85 -0.82 25.79 248 3.20 13.85 82.95 29.07 27.74
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc Avg. Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 2.2945
0.9860 0.84 61.953 149.30 82 51.753 7.028 0.1196 0.9990 0.999
Avg. Sqrt
Dlp Vs scfm wet acfm Qsd dscfh
# Sample
Points Dn
Total Test
time (minutes)
Time @ point
(minutes)Avg. Dlh
1.016 72.62 31,861 49,576 1.68E+06 25 0.2532 62.5 2.50 2.39
TRUE
Point No.Meter (cf)dl "p"dl "h"ts F tm F (in)tm F (out)Imp. Liquid Collected
1 301.200 2.10 4.48 225.0 69.0 69.0 Wt. (Final)Wt. (Initial)lc
2 305.020 2.10 4.48 228.0 69.0 69.0 475.9 360.0 115.9
3 308.065 1.60 3.42 230.0 71.0 69.0 619.8 597.3 22.5
4 311.050 1.20 2.67 232.0 73.0 70.0 603.5 596.9 6.6
5 313.785 1.40 3.12 234.0 77.0 71.0 772.8 768.5 4.3
6 316.685 1.70 3.79 243.0 81.0 74.0 0.0
7 320.240 1.30 2.89 243.0 84.0 75.0
8 322.670 0.89 1.98 246.0 86.0 76.0 Isokinetics 96.1
9 324.990 0.88 1.96 248.0 88.0 77.0 Test Date 9/24/24-9/25/24
10 327.520 1.50 3.34 250.0 90.0 78.0 Start Time 8:45
11 330.558 1.40 3.12 252.0 94.0 81.0 End Time 10:18
12 333.490 1.30 2.89 253.0 94.0 81.0
13 336.265 1.05 2.34 253.0 97.0 83.0
14 338.689 0.75 1.67 252.0 97.0 83.0
15 340.895 0.79 1.26 242.0 81.0 80.0
16 343.151 1.30 2.89 252.0 83.0 80.0
17 345.970 1.20 2.67 256.0 84.0 81.0
18 348.880 1.20 2.67 257.0 85.0 81.0
19 351.165 0.60 1.34 256.0 87.0 81.0
20 353.060 0.50 1.11 257.0 89.0 82.0
21 354.784 0.69 1.54 258.0 89.0 83.0
22 356.850 0.72 1.60 259.0 90.0 83.0
23 358.820 0.55 1.22 259.0 91.0 84.0
24 360.515 0.34 0.76 260.0 91.0 84.0
25 361.895 0.25 0.56 259.0 93.0 86.0
26 363.153
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page 4

PM10 COMPLIANCE TEST
CONDUCTED FOR STAKER AND PARSON COMPANIES
(dba WESTERN ROCK PRODUCTS)
BGM 400 BAGHOUSE

September 24, 2024

by:

TETCO
391 East 620 South
American Fork, UT 84003
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Prepared for:

Staker and Parson Companies
Big Water
Duchesne County, UT 84066

Date of Report:

October 9, 2024
CERTIFICATION OF REPORT INTEGRITY.
Technical Emissions Testing Company (TETCO) certifies that this report represents the truth as
well as can be derived by the methods employed. Every effort was made to obtain accurate and
representative data and to comply with procedures set forth in the Federal Register.
Dean A. Kitchen
Reviewer: _______ ~~~-· -'--1-,_/} __ ~~,,._1/!_~ _________ _
Date: ________ /£"--. ~---__,_Z~-:-c/__,__ ______ _
XuanN. Dang
Reviewer: ~ --......,........____.,,~------------------------
Date: ______ _,_/~r,-tfs--r-/.._\.-,.C,--------------
ii

iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
Introduction
Test Purpose .........................................................................................................................1
Test Location and Type of Process ......................................................................................1
Test Dates.............................................................................................................................1
Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied ..............................................................................1
Test Participants ...................................................................................................................1
Deviations From EPA Methods ...........................................................................................2
Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................2

Summary of Results
Emission Results ..................................................................................................................3
Process Data .........................................................................................................................3
Allowable Emissions ...........................................................................................................3
Description of Collected Samples ........................................................................................3
Discussion of Errors or Irregularities ...................................................................................4
Percent Isokinetic .................................................................................................................4

Source Operation
Process Control Devices Operation .....................................................................................5
Process Representativeness ..................................................................................................5

Sampling and Analytical Procedures
Sampling Port Location .......................................................................................................6
Sampling Point Location......................................................................................................6
Sampling Train Description .................................................................................................6
Sampling and Analytical Procedures ...................................................................................7
Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................7

Appendices
A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations
B: Raw Field Data
C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Raw Production Data
E: Calibration Procedures and Results
F: Related Correspondence

iv
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE
Table
I Measured PM Emissions and Production Rates ..................................................................3
II Percent Isokinetic Sampling ................................................................................................4
III Sampling Point Locations ....................................................................................................6
IV Complete Results ............................................................................................... Appendix A

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure
1 Facility Schematic Representation ..................................................................... Appendix D
2 Schematic of Method 5/202 Sampling Train ..................................................... Appendix E

1

INTRODUCTION

Test Purpose

The test was conducted to determine compliance with the PM10 emission limit for the BGM 400
Baghouse exhaust in accordance with the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division
of Air Quality Approval Order DAQE-209-96, dated February 23, 1996. Emission results were
expressed in lb/hr and gr/dscf where applicable and can be found in Appendix A.

Test Location and Type of Process

The asphalt plant was located in Big Water, Utah. The source tested was the BGM 400
Baghouse. Sand, gravel, recyclable, asphalt and oil were mixed and dried in a used oil fired
drum. The exhaust gas passed through the BGM baghouse. A facility schematic is shown as
Figure 1 found in Appendix D.

Test Dates

Test crews drove to the plant and set up equipment on September 23, 2024. No testing was
conducted on this date. Run 1 and run 2 were completed on September 24, 2024. Run 3 was
completed on September 25, 2024.

Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied

These tests were a gravimetric determination of PM particulate in accordance with EPA Methods
5 and 202. For this project, Method 5 was used instead of Method 201A because the relatively
high moisture content of the stack exhaust would lead to a low Method 201A sample rate,
despite the stack gas not being saturated with water droplets.

Condensable particulate matter (PM) was sampled as the back-half of the Method 5 sample train.
This data was used for inventory purposes only.

Test Participants

Test Facility Chris Rose

State Agency None

TETCO Dean Kitchen Mike McNamara
Jeremiah Opthof Xuan Dang

2

Deviations From EPA Methods

None.

Quality Assurance

Testing procedures and sample recovery techniques were according to those outlined in the
Federal Register and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems.

3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Emission Results

Table I presents the summary results of the compliance test. Detailed testing results are found in
Table IV. Complete Results in Appendix A.

Table I Measured PM Emissions and Production Rates
Run #
Particulate Matter Production
Rate
Concentration
(gr/dscf)
Emission Rate
(lbs/hr) (TPH)
1 0.0106 4.230 276.2
2 0.0059 2.491 275.9
3 0.0064 2.723 280.7
AVE 0.0077 3.148 277.6

Condensable particulate matter results are found on Table IV located in Appendix A.

Process Data

The process was operated according to standard procedures. All pertinent process data was
available for recording by agency personnel. Aggregate, recycled asphalt, asphalt tar feed rate,
and the baghouse differential pressure drop were recorded on production sheets found in
Appendix D.

Allowable Emissions

The allowable PM emissions for this source is 0.016 gr/dscf under normal operation and 0.018
gr/dscf when using recycled asphalt.

Description of Collected Samples

The front washes were clear in appearance. There was a small amount of visible tan colored
particulate on the test filters.

4
Discussion of Errors or Irregularities

None.

Percent Isokinetic Sampling

The EPA Method 5/202 test runs were isokinetic within the ±10% of 100% criteria specified in
the Federal Register. Isokinetic values for each test run are presented in Table II below.

Table II. Percent Isokinetic Sampling
Run # Percent Isokinetic
1 91
2 96
3 96

5

SOURCE OPERATION

Process Control Devices Operation

All control devices operated normally. Control equipment data is found on the production data
sheets.

Process Representativeness

The facility was operated normally. Production data is contained in Appendix D.

6

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Sampling Port Location

Port location is depicted in Figure 1. The inside dimension of the stack were 47 by 35 inches.
Five sample ports were available for testing. These ports were located 48 inches upstream from
the next disturbance and 82 feet downstream from the last disturbance.

Sampling Point Location

Table III shows the distance of each sampling point from the inside wall according to EPA
Method 1. Each point was marked with a wrapping of glass tape. These points were determined
by measuring the distance from the inside wall and adding the reference (port) measurement.

Table III. Sampling Point Locations
Traverse Point Distance (inches)
1 3.50
2 10.50
3 17.50
4 24.50
5 31.50

Sampling Train Description

To determine the actual emission rates for this stack, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, and 40
CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 202 were followed.

All sampling trains were made of Teflon, stainless steel and glass to prevent interference of the
sampled gas. The stack analyzer used to conduct Methods 5 and 202 was constructed to meet the
specifications outlined in the CFR. The temperature sensors were K-type thermocouples.
Heater, vacuum and pitot line connections were designed to be interchangeable with all units
used by the tester. Stainless steel probe liners were used for each test run. Figure 2 in Appendix
E is a sketch of the Method 5/202 sampling train. Sample boxes were prepared for testing by
following the prescribed procedure outlined in Methods 5 and 202.

Sampling and Analytical Procedures

All sampling and analytical test procedures employed were as specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix
A, Method 5 and 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method and 202.

7

Quality Assurance

All equipment set-up, sampling procedures, sample recovery and equipment calibrations were
carried out according to the procedures specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 5and 40
CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 202 and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems.

8
APPENDICES

A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations
B: Raw Field Data
C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody
D: Raw Production Data
E: Calibration Procedures and Results
F: Protocol and Related Correspondence

A

APPENDIX A
Complete Results and Sample Equations

Table IV. Complete Results
Nomenclature
Sample Equations

Method 5, 202TABLE IV
COMPLETE RESULTS
STAKER PARSON COMPANIES, BIG WATER, UTAH
BGM 400 TPH ASPHALT PLANT BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3
Date Date 9/24/24 9/24/24 9/25/24
Filter #7824 7825 7786
Begin Time Test Began 12:50 14:41 8:45
End Time Test Ended 13:57 17:36 10:18
Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.85 25.85 25.85
DH Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 1.948 2.328 2.411
Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 0.986 0.986 0.986
Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 55.470 61.733 61.953
Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 85.6 94.9 81.9
DP Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.9765 1.0250 1.0165
Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 155.7 157.2 149.3
Tt Duration of Test Minutes 62.5 62.5 62.5
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84
Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.2538 0.2520 0.2538
CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 3.00 3.00 3.20
O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 13.90 13.80 13.85
N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 83.10 83.20 82.95
Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard)dscf 45.982 50.369 51.774
Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 7.343 7.414 7.041
Bws (measured)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Measured)Fraction 0.138 0.128 0.120
Bws (calculated)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Calculated)Fraction 1.009 1.009 1.009
Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.138 0.128 0.120
Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.862 0.872 0.880
Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 29.04 29.03 29.07
Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 27.52 27.62 27.74
%I Percent Isokinetic Percent 90.5 95.7 95.7
AVG
Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 257.4 269.0 248.2 258.2
As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.20.129 20.129 20.129
PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.82 -0.82 -0.82
Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.83 25.83 25.83
Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 25.770 25.770 25.770
Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std)dscfm 4.65E+04 4.89E+04 4.96E+04 4.83E+04
Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual)cfm 8.52E+04 9.00E+04 8.77E+04 8.76E+04
Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 4.23E+03 4.47E+03 4.36E+03 4.35E+03
Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams 14.4 6.7 -3.7 *
Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 17.2 12.7 25.2
MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 31.6 19.4 21.5 24.17
MB Mass of Back Half milligrams 52.7 47.0 43.4 47.70
CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0106 0.0059 0.0064 0.0077
Ccond Concentration of Condensibles gr / dscf 0.0177 0.0144 0.0129 0.0150
CFcond Combined Front Half and CPM gr / dscf 0.0283 0.0203 0.0193 0.0227
ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 4.230 2.491 2.723 3.148
ERcond Emission Rate of Condensibles lb / hr 7.054 6.035 5.496 6.195
ERFcond Emission Rate of Front Half and CPM lb / hr 11.284 8.525 8.218 9.343
*Negative filter weight were due to small filter pieces being put in the front wash.
%I =percent isokinetic
As =stack cross-sectional area (ft3)
AS'P =see —'P
Btu =unit heat value (British thermal unit)
Bws =fraction of water in stack gas
Ccpm =concentration of condensibles (grain/dscf)
Cf =concentration of particulate matter, front half (gr/dscf,lb/dscf, etc.)
Cmetal =concentration of metals (ppm, Pg/ft3, etc.) atomic symbol replaces "metal"
CO2 =percent carbon dioxide in the stack gas
Cp =pitot tube coefficient (0.84)
CX (avg)=species symbol replaces x .
CX (corr)=actual gas concentration corrected to required percent O2'H =orifice pressure drop (inches H2O)
'H@ =orifice pressure (inches H2O)
Dn =nozzle diameter (inches)
Dn des =calculated desired nozzle size (inches)
'P =stack flow pressure differential (inches H2O)
Ds =diameter of the stack (feet)
EA =percent excess air
ERcpm =emission rate of condensibles (lb/hr)
ERF =emission rate of front half particulate (lb/hr)
ERmmBtu =emission rate per mmBtu or ton of fuel etc.
ERX =emission rate of compound which replaces x
K-fact =multiplier of test point 'P to determine test point 'H
L =length of rectangular stack (inches)
mBtu =thousand Btu
Mcpm =mass of condensibles (milligrams)
Md =molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis (lb/lb-mol)
MF =mass of particulate on filter (mg)
MFP =mass of particulate matter on filter and probe (mg)
mmBtu =million Btu
MP =mass of particulate matter in probe (mg)
Ms =molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis (g/gmol)
N2 =percent nitrogen in the stack gas
O2 =percent oxygen in the stack gas
—'P =average of the square roots of 'P (may also be referred to as AS'P)
Pbm =absolute barometric pressure at the dry gas meter (inches Hg)
Pbp =absolute barometric pressure at the sample location (inches Hg)
PG =stack static pressure (inches H2O)
Ps =absolute stack pressure (inches Hg)
Pstd =absolute pressure at standard conditions (29.92 inches Hg.)
T =time of test (minutes)
Qa =stack gas volumetric flow rate (acfm)
Method 5 / 202 Nomenclature
Method 5 / 202 Nomenclature
Qs =stack gas volumetric flow rate (dscfm)
Qw =wet stack gas std. volumetric flow (ft3/min, wscfm)
Tm =meter temperature (oF)
Ts =stack temperature (oF)
Tstd =absolute temperature at standard conditions (528oR)
Tt =see T
Vm =sample volume (ft3) at meter conditions
Vmstd =volume standard (dscf), sample volume adjusted to 68oF and 29.92 inches Hg.
Vs =velocity of stack gas (fpm)
Vw =volume water vapor (scf) at 68oF and 29.92 inches Hg.
W =width of rectangular stack (inches)
Wtwc =weight of the condensed water collected (grams)
Xd =fraction of dry gas
Y =meter calibration Y-factor (dimensionless)
%I =Vmstd • (Ts + 460) • 1039 / (T • Vs • Ps • Xd • Dn2)
As =(Ds2 / 4) • S
Bws =Vw / (Vmstd +Vw)
Ccpm =Mcpm • 0.01543 / Vmstd
Ccors =Mcors • 0.01543 / Vmstd
Cf =Mfp • 0.01543 / Vmstd
CX (corr)=CX (avg) • (20.9 - desired %O2) / (20.9 - actual %O2)
Deq =2 • L • W / (L + W)
Dn des =—{0.0269 • (Pbm + 0.0735) / [(Tm + 460) • Cp • Xd • —[(Ts + 460) • Ms) / (Ps • 'P)]]}
EA =(%O2 - 0.5 %CO) / [0.264 %N2 - (%O2 - 0.5 %CO)]
ERcpm =Ccpm • Qs • 0.00857
ERF =Cf • Qs • 0.00857
ERmmBtu =ERX / (mmBtu / hr)
K-fact =846.72 • Dn4 • 'H@ • Cp2 • Xd2 • Md • Ps • (Tm + 460) / [Ms • (Ts + 460) • (Pbm + 'H / 13.6)]
Md =CO2 • 0.44 + O2 • 0.32 + N2 •0.28
Ms =(Md • Xd) + (18 • Bws)
Ps =Pbp + (PG / 13.6)
Qa =Vs • As
Qs =Qa • Xd • Ps • Tstd / [(Ts + 460) • Pstd]
Qw =Qs / Xd
Vmstd =Vm • Y • Tstd • (Pbm + 'H / 13.6) / [Pstd • (Tm + 460)]
Vs =85.49 • 60 • Cp • —'P • — [(Ts + 460) / (Ps • Ms)]
Vw =Wtwc • 0.04715
Xd =1 - Bws
Method 5 / 202 Sample Equations
B

APPENDIX B
Raw Field Data

Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data
Particulate Field Data

C

APPENDIX C
Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody

Sample Recovery
PM Analysis Lab Sheets
Condensable Particulate Matter Analysis Lab Sheets
Gas Analysis Data (ORSAT)
Chain of Custody

Facility: Staker, Big Water
Stack Identification: HMA
Date:
-------------------Method:
IMPINGERS
Filter Number:
i·u\ ~ Purge start ~ 7i , !il
Purge end. t5~] 'J"
ml H20 added rf$'
IMPINGERS
Filter Number:
Final (g)
Run: l Sample Box: __ 4=__. __
lmpmger Number
Dry
t I 2 I Cold
3 I ....L s 6
Initial Volume of liquid (H20) in impingers, (ml)
Run: 2.. Sample Box: B
Dry
1 1 2
lmpmger Number I Cold
3 1 4.. s 6
Initial Volume ofliquid (H20) in impingers, (ml)
__.__.._:"---,',..__,~ ..... ~"--i~---':,..,....~~ ..... ..,_;...-:i-----t-----
Initial (g) c=:;,...;,..;::.'----i-==-='-----'--,-1i-:...-..:........,,c,...+--""-',;;;..-c.....c...-"-+-----+----
Net (g) :ii=c:~==;;==d!:~==1t:==;:::=!==;a~==;=a#=:!=jF=========== pm filter description weig & ana yze
'9hf ,n tt ) 1Y/&t'1Ns1fs----~~~c-1
~(g)-=======A=c~et":"'on=e==-
Purge start OJ'. '1,'
Hexane
Purge end 18 \II,(~
ml H20 added p
IMPINGERS ) Run: Sample Box: V'
Filter Number: lmpmger Number
--,7 <:?~ Dry
1 I ....L
I Cold
3 1 4.. s 6
Initial Volume ofliquid (J-1,0) in impingers, (ml)
pm filter description
,1,.,, t ,5~ io.~ '7Jll$e 'ft-
JfJ-!JJJ'
I 70-V
Initials
1(/2
;fJJ.MA..
Initials
. . RINSES H20
Purge start \-;) ', 3~
Purge end \ \ ·, )0
Acetone .......... ----Hexa-,le . --
fl,¾, / I? c,,-_/ ;/"'!-r~ IJ,.(7/JI vr,,,,~.fh
ml H20 added '
Facility: Staker, Big Water, UT
Stad.: ldentilication: HMA BMG 400 Baghouse
Filter Number: 7824
Date: 9/24/2024
Run: -----Sample Box: A ----------~----~--~------------============---------~------__::___--====== Blanks &
Rinses
FiHter
Front Half
Blanks
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/IO0ml
Fina11: 0.6979 g --------Fin al 2: 0.6977 g
FinalAvG: 0.6978 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6834 g
Net 0.0144 g
Net 14.4 mg
Final1: 60.3372 g
Final2: 60.3375 g
FinalAvG: 60.3374 g
Initia11: 60.3203 g
Initial2: 60.3201 g
InitialAvG: 60.3202 g
Gross: 0.0172 g
Rinses
Date: 9/27/2024
Date: 10/3/2024
Process
Final
Date: 9/27/2024
Date: 10/3/2024
Date: 6/27/2024
Date: 7/1/2024
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 12:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00
Time: 12:00
Time: 9:00
15:00
CRITERIA
BeakerN umber: 54 Blank: 0.0000 g Process Weight Time
Net 0.0172 g Final Pass Pass
Net 17.2 mg Initial Pass Pass
RESULTS Front Half
Filter 14.4 mg ----Wash 17.2 mg
Total 31.6 mg ----------------------~-----~----====""===""=:____:_ _____________ _
Comments: Criteria: ]) Weights are,-0.5 mg of each other, or within I% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings.
Lab Technician: M.Mcnamara Date: 9/26/24
Lab Technician: D. Kitchen Date: 10/3/24
Facility: Staker, Big Water, UT
Stack Identification: HMA BMG 400 Baghouse
Filter Number: 7825
Blanks Blanks &
Rinses Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/l00ml
---···· -~·-·-·---
li'iiter Final 1: 0.6931 g
Final2: 0.6929 g
Fina!Avo: 0.6930
Filter Preweight: 0.6863
g
g
Net 0.0067 g
Front Half Final 1:
Final2:
Initial 1:
Initial 2:
50.0578
50.0576
________ g
________ g
50.0451 g
50.0449 g
Net 6.7 mg
FinalAvo: 50.0577 g
Initia!AV0 : 50.0450 g
Gross: 0.0127 g
Beaker Number: 55 Blank: 0.0000 g
Net 0.0127 g
Net 12.7 mg
-· --~-----·· . ----------~-RESULTS Front Half
Filter 6.7 mg ----Wash 12.7 mg
Total 19.4 mg
Comments:
Date: 9/24/2024
Run: 2
Sample Box: B
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 70 ml
Date: 9/27/24
Date: 10/3/24
Process
Final
Date: 9/27/24
Date: 10/3/24
Date: 6/27124
Date: 7 /1/24
Process
Final
Initial
-----
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 12:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00 -----Time: 12:00
Time: 9:00 -----Time: 15:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Pass Pass
Lab Technician: M.Mcnamara Date: 9/26/24
Lab Technician: D. Kitchen Date: 10/3/24
Facility: Staker, Big Water, UT
Stack Identification: HMA BMG 400 Baghouse
Filter Number: 7786
Blanks &
Rinses
Fiiter
Front Half
Blanks
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 0.0000 g/100ml
Final 1: 0.6543 g --------Fin a Ii: 0.6543 g
FinalAva: 0.6543 g
Filter Preweight: 0.6580 g
Net -0.0037 g
Net -3.7 mg
Final 1: 61.4355 g --------Fin al 2: 61.4356 g
FinalAva: 61.4356 g
Initial 1: 61.4105 g --------1 nit i a I 2: 61.4102 g
Initial Ava: 61.4104 g
Gross: 0.0252 g
Beaker Number: 56 Blank: 0.0000 g
RESULTS
Filter
Wash
Total
Net
Net
Front Half
-3.7
25.2
21.5
0.0252 g
25.2 mg
mg
mg
mg
Date: 9/25/2024
Run: 3
Sample Box: C
Rinses
Acetone (CH3COCH3) 80 ml -----
Date: 9/27/2024
Date: I 0/3/2024
Process II
Finalll
Date: 9/27/2024
Date: 10/3/2024
Date: 6/27/2024
Date: 7/1/2024
Process
Final
Initial
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 12:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Time: 8:00 ----Time: 12:00
Time: 9:00 -----Time: 15:00
CRITERIA
Weight Time
Pass Pass
Pass Pass
---··--·--------------~-~--~--
Comments: Criteria: I) Weights are± 0.5 mg of each other, or within]% of the net weight .. 2) There ~Jail li_e_~_":a~t 6 hrs_between weighings. ····-·--···-. ___________ _
Lab Technician: M.Mcnamara Date: 9/26/24
Lab Technician: D. Kitchen Date: 10/3/24
Facilty: Staker, Big water. UT
Stack Identification: HMA BMG 400 Baghouse
Sample Description/ID # Run 1
Inorganic CPM
Beaker/Tin # 893 Date Time
Final Weight (1), g 2.2311 1014124 I 8:oo I
Final Weight (2), g 2.2311 10m24 I 8:oo I
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2311
Initial Weight (1), g 2.2291 1111124 I 8:oo I
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2291 1111124 I 14:oo I
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2291
mr: Initial Inorganic Wt, mg 2.00
H2O added in Extractions, ml 60 pH pH
Reconstituted H2O Volume, ml Start End
N: Normality ofNH4OH I I
Vt: Volume ofNH4OH, ml
m0: Mass ofNH4 Added, mg
m; (or mib): Final Inorganic Wt, mg 2.00
Organic CPM
Beaker/Tin # 896 Date Time
Final Weight (1), g 2.2827 1014124 I 8:oo I
Final Weight (2), g 2.2825 10m24 I 8:oo I
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2826
Initial Weight (1), g 2.2300 m1124 I 8:oo I
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2298 1111124 I 14:oo I
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2299
m0 (or m0b): Net Organic Wt, mg 52.70
mcom : Gross CPM, mg 54.7
mcpm: Blank CPM, mg 2.0
mcpm : Net CPM, mg 52.7
pH Meter: Oakton pHTestr BNC, Electrode Model: 35801-00
Fisher pH Buffer 4.001 pH I Date I
Fisher pH Buffer 7.00 ~----~
I Time I
Method 202 Laboratory Form
9/24-25/24 Test Date(s): _________ _
Run2 Run 3
Rel. Hum Rel. Hum Rel. Hum
% 894 Date Time % 895 Date Time %
< 1 2.2381 1014124 I 8:oo I < I 2.2335 1014124 I 8:oo I < I
< 1 2.2384 1om24 I 8:oo I < 1 2.2334 1om24 I 8:oo I < 1
2.2383 2.2335
< 1 2.2328 m1124 I 8:oo I < 1 2.2317 m1124 I 8:oo I < 1
<l 2.2330 1111124 I 14:oo I < 1 2.2320 m1124 I 14:oo I < 1
2.2329 2.2319
5.35 1.60
60 pH pH 60 pH pH
Start End Start End
I I I I
5.35 1.60
Rel. Hum Rel. Hum Rel. Hum
% 897 Date Time % 898 Date Time %
<1 2.2843 1014124 I 8:oo I < 1 2.2708 1014124 I 8:oo I <l
< 1 2.2839 10m24 I 8:oo I <l 2.2706 10m24 I 8:oo I < 1
2.2841 2.2707
<l 2.2403 1111124 I 8:oo I <l 2.2268 1111124 I 8:oo I < 1
<l 2.2407 1111124 I 14:oo I < 1 2.2269 m 1124 I 14:oo I <l
2.2405 2.2269
43.60 43.85
49.0 45.4
2.0 2.0
47.0 43.4
Lab Technician: M. McNamara Date: 9/26/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/7/24 -----------Form Date: 10/21/2015
Facilty: Staker, Big water, UT
Stack Identification: HMA BMG 400 Baghouse
Method 202 Laboratory Form
Sample Description/ID # Recovery Blank
Inorganic CPM
Rel.Hum
Beaker/tin # 899 Date Time % 900
Final Weight (I), g 2.2382 10/4/24 8:00 <l 2.2422
Final Weight (2), g 2.2380 10/7/24 8:00 < 1 2.2420
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2381 2.2421
Initial Weight ( 1 ), g 2.2371 7/17/24 8:00 <1 2.2415
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2372 7/17/24 14:00 <1 2.2415
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2372 2.2415
mr: Initial Inorganic Wt, mg 0.95 0.60
H2O added in Extractions, ml 60 pH pH 60
Reconstituted H2O Volume, ml Start End
N: Normality ofNH4OH
V1: Volume ofNH4OH, ml
m0: Mass ofNH4 Added, mg
mi ( or mib): Final Inorganic Wt, mg 0.95 0.60
Organic CPM
Rel. Hum
Beaker/tin # 901 Date Time % 902
Final Weight (1), g 2.2253 10/4/24 8:00 <1 2.2357
Final Weight (2), g 2.2254 10/7/24 8:00 <1 2.2356 -
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2254 2.2357
Initial Weight (I), g 2.2239 7/17/24 8:00 <1 2.2344
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2240 7/17/24 14:00 <1 2.2343
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2240 2.2344
m0 (or m0b): Net Organic Wt, mg 1.40 1.30
mcpm (or mfb): Total CPM, mg 2.3 1.9
pH Meter: Oakton pHTestr BNC, Electrode Model: 35801-00 I pH I Date I Time I Lab Tech., M. MeNwnara
Fisher pH Buffer 4.00
Fisher pH Buffer 7.00=============---~-~ Lab Tech.: Dean Kitchen
Test Date(s): 9/24-25/24
Proof Blank
Date Time Rel. Hum%
10/4/24 8:00 <1
10/7/24 8:00 <1
7/17/24 8:00 <1
. 7/17/24 14:00 <1
pH pH
Start End
Date Time Rel.Hum%
10/4/24 8:00 < 1
10/7/24 8:00 <1
7/17/24 8:00 < 1
7/17/24 14:00 < 1
Date: 9/26/24
Date: 10/7/24
Form Date: 10/21/15
Method 202 Field Reagent Blank Form
Facilty: Staker, Big water, UT
Stack Identification: HMA BMG 400 Baghouse
Blank Description/ID# Water RICCA Reagent
Lot# 2307F47
Rel. Hum
Beaker/tin # 903 Date Time %
Final Weight (1), g 2.2230 1014124 I 8:oo I <l
Final Weight (2), g 2.2231 10m24 I 8:oo I < 1
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2231
Initial Weight (1), g 2.2229 m 1124 I 8:oo I < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2228 1111124 I 14:oo I < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2229
Blank Residual Mass, mg 0.20 Water
Blank Mass, g 241
Blank Volume, ml 241
Max Blank Residulal Mass, mg 0.24
Test Date(s):
Acetone Fisher ACS Hexane
220983 MKCR-0528
Rel.Hum
904 Date Time % 905
2.2252 1014124 I 8:oo I < 1 2.2219
2.2252 10m24 I 8:oo I < 1 2.2219
2.2252 2.2219
2.2252 1111124 I 8:oo I < 1 2.2219
2.2252 1111124 I 14:oo I < 1 2.2219
2.2252 2.2219
0.00 Acetone 0.00
198 166
252 249
0.25 0.25
Lab Technician: M. McNamara
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen
9/24-25/24 ----------
Sigma-Aldrich
Rel. Hum
Date Time %
1014124 I 8:oo I <l
10m24 I 8:oo I < 1
1111124 I 8:oo I < 1
1111124 I 14:oo I <l
Hexane
Date: 9/26/24
Date: 10/7/24
Form Date: 10/21/20 I 5
Method 202 Laboratory Reagent Blank Form
Blank Description/ID# Water RICCA Reagent Acetone Supelco Hexane Sigma-Aldrich
Lot# 2307F47 220983 MKCR-0528
Rel. Hum Rel. Hum Rel. Hum
Beaker/tin # 906 Date Time % 907 Date Time % 908 Date Time %
Final Weight (I), g 2.2183 10/4/24 8:00 < 1 2.2398 10/4/24 8:00 < 1 2.2290 1014124 I 8:oo I < 1
Final Weight(2), g 2.2183 10/7/24 8:00 <l 2.2398 10/7/24 8:00 < 1 2.2290 10m24 I 8:oo I <l
Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2183 2.2398 2.2290
Initial Weight (I), g 2.2184 7/17/24 8:00 < 1 2.2395 7/17/24 8:00 <l 2.2292 1111124 I 8:oo I < 1
Initial Weight (2), g 2.2182 7/17/24 14:00 <l 2.2400 7/17/24 14:00 <l 2.2290 1111124 I 14:oo I < 1
Ave. Initial Weight, 2 2.2183 2.2398 2.2291
Blank Residual Mass, mg 0.00 Water 0.05 Acetone 0.00 Hexane
Blank Mass, g 238 175 151
Blank Volume, ml 238 223 226
Max Blank Residulal Mass, mg 0.24 0.22 0.23
Lab Technician: M. McNamara Date: 9/26/24
Lab Technician: Dean Kitchen Date: 10/7/24
Form Date: I 0/21/2015
Plant: Staker Big Water, UT. Location: BMG 400 Baghouse
Analytical Method: Orsat/Fyrite ----~--------------
RUN
2
Actual Net Actual Net Actual
Date <q I 'V{/'2..'f Gas Reading
Test No~:;;, e ~u l=\=======lp=====l====H========:c==='ll=
Reading Reading
Gas Bag No. A-o?: CO2
Ambient Temp C,. ~
Operator -~-0 2 (Net is Actual 0 2
Reading Minus Actual I '9, '1-
Date 9 /1-<.({1-~
TestNo. 2...
Gas Bag No. (=-Of-..
Ambient Temp l68
Operator ~
Date ct/-ZS/i.l.(
Test No. 3
Gas Bag No. C.-o "r-
Ambient Temp ~l.f
Operator ~
C02 Reading).
N2 (Net is 100 Minus
Actual 0 2 Reading).
Gas
CO2
0 2 (Net is Actual 0 2
Reading Minus Actual
CO2 Reading).
N2 (Net is 100 Minus
Actual 0 2 Reading).
Gas
CO2
0 2 (Net is Actual 0 2
Reading Minus Actual
CO2 Reading).
N2 (Net is 100 Minus
Actual 0 2 Reading).
Actual
Reading
l · °I.
l t3. b
Actual
Reading
2:~
16,o
1.-. l -i. • l z.. \
IS, 2... H3,z.
RUN
2
Net Actual Net Actual
Reading Reading
1. C\. I.<\ l.' I, ,
IS,b J 8,6
RUN
2
Net Actual Net Actual
Reading Reading
2,3 2.) 2,3 2.3
lt:1-0 18-o
RUN
2
3
Net
-i. l
3
Net
I. 9
3
Net
,.3
3
Actual
Reading
Net Actual Net Actual Net
Date -----Test No. ____ _
Gas Bag No. ____ _
Ambient Temp ____ _
Operator ____ _
Gas
0 2 (Net is Actual 0 2
Reading Minus Actual
CO2 Reading).
N2 (Net is 100 Minus
Actual 0 2 Reading).
Reading
CO is not measured as it has the same molecular weight as N2
Reading
Average
Net
Volume
z.. l
18,-Z....
Average
Net
Volume I,,
,s.6
Average
Net
Volume
J8,o
Average
Net
Volume
TETCO
Facility (& Source): J' ~ V
Stack Emission Analysis
Accurate • Reliable e Qualified
Chain of Custody
<U <U if) if) C C 2 2 Q) f-4..Q bJ) ...c: "' if) ~
fJ ($' pt Lf-tro As.,o ~ ~~ ~ i::: <U ...c ...c: c2 :::
"' ~ o:s 0
(1j X 1;l
At.~ L1 IA L ,r-, r-.-, --~ ~ <U u 1: :r: ...c: 2 '-...c: 0 ~ -Q) ~ i::: '-;::: u § ~ 2 i:.z._ £l ~ cZ <U
i:.I... Q) u ::: 0.. Method(s) of "' 2 1: @ i:.I... ~ 0 Q) 0 ~ 0..
Sample ID Date Analysis 2 i::: 0 ~ 0... £ 0 0
i:.z._ cZ u 0... u <C ~
J'c>~ 732...-'-f '1./) <,/;a. r/ ... ,.,,. IY IX I~ I)< x ,
Ii?.-"J.p > .,_ l1 .. , I Ix X X lX )<
/)) ~) .J(' 'l /Jr IL-.., I X )< x )( X' -q/,il_./h r-/t,rh /
~
/),,,,e,.,._,:,,. ~ ?.> ,_. L. /) __ ". /lfA_/_ -'fl /1--? /1~ I X )< )< /
T ---/l_,.. _ • .,,,n. 1Jr,l!,,,._l 1c; 1t~ z;, I )( ~ ~v
✓ -.
Sampled By: ~
Recovered B~: ~r--
Analyzed By: 4'14---+--
Relin_g_uished By: Received By:
Relinquished By: Received By:
All samples remained in the custody ofTETCO unless otherwise indicated.
Comments:
Q) Q) "' "' i::: i:::
c2 c2
v ~ i::: (1j ...c: u ...c: ~ u ~ u Q) u 0 i:::
.8 0 r/J Q)
"' v u
::r:: u <C
)<
"' Q)
~
'-Q) ~ Q) ~ ::r::
"}c X
391 E 620 S, American Fork, UT 84003
801-492-9106 @ 80 l -492-9 I 07
Notes
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
D

APPENDIX D
Raw Production Data

Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation
Raw Production Data

Facility:
Stack Identification:
Baghouse
Estimated Moisture, percent
a: Distance upstream from next disturbance, inches
b: Distance downstream from last disturbance, inches
BMG 400 Baghouse Exhaust
48"
82"
35"
Asphalt DrumType:
Number of Ports
Process
Type:
Control Unit
5
W: Stack Inside Width, inches
4,200
Estimated Temperature, oF
Estimated Velocity, fpm
47"L: Stack Inside Length, inches
L
Staker and Parsons (dba Wester Rock Products), Big Water, UT
25%
300
g: Distance of Sample Level to Ground, feet TBD
a
g
b
W
Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation
Aggregate Feed Recycle (RAP)
Time (TPH) (TPH)
ta:sn /];]5' L/n
l3~oc> cX ~ '-l ?/i
\3: \ l ~a4~ 29 < ) '
\'3 :JI aa,~ 3~
13:31 &Jo ~°1
r3.:i:,;;. :J:l3 31
13:51 aa~ 3lo
11-f: 00 dol'-1 :2> 7
i,..-Q.uv
(tJ~,-,,0 J a, ?,(o
u~\:r:;1 rJQx~ ?Jrf
15:0 I. aa(p 3'3'
11:;·:11 ;JJ5 .. ?n °J
\S: a\ c1d4 -~9
\~~ ~ 1 .., €,·.-Ja~ .2, 7
1'3':Ji) f> 8a<-l 3,5
Notes:
\
Production Data ,.
Date . q -a '-I ·-a L.I
Run# 1-d
Asphalt Tar Total
(TPH) (TPH)
!31Z ;J l<J,, 3
1·2 i .1 • d.7fo~~
i3~("1 a1~~~
13. i ,ll 3. Z
P-L,O ;1 ~ I" 0
\ ·5.~ ~7~~.3
13.7 :i.73.l
.· L)., .._ a lLI. 7 ~
·::t:t=-~ -
13. (o /:J..l().ftll
13 .'1 c9.7·7 /=\
\3,.9 a1·1..cr
1:5.'1 :1 ·17, CJ
14 e () &·1 ·1.0
13 .. °I ~'13~°!
ij~ () /}.l /n,.O .
Baghouse
t.P
'-{."3
'-I ~.S
4.Y
L\ _q ;
. t-1 -5
Li Jo
.t.f r ·• .:)
'-L ~
y __ q
4-l "7 iJ
4 .. 1
l-f ~ 5
/~~ w
wts
4 If h
Production Data
Facility {A)q_5fern (<_ock: 13131<.1<>1fu-Date j\~5-a 4
Source HVV\ A Ba5hcnue Run# ··~
Aggregate Feed Recycle (RAP) Asphalt Tar Total Baghouse
Time (TPH) (TPH) (TPH) (TPH) ~p
t '.. 41 azt7 3$ l3~i ;J,75~1 LLL(
i1s>Z 8-.ri.7 3g I '-I J<{>'(J ,f:J LLS'
Cf :.09 oL~~ 3c ,~ 1 J .. J77, 1 4 I L/
cr~'"it.t d;:) 4' 31 J ~. I 1~1>«. ( '-L0
q:5L( ;~~ 9 '-10 ILi. l a&:s.a Y.5
lO!O'-) o>.ag LIO l'-1.0 n1ia.o '-L lo
10:.1'-1 ad i ~1 IYeO aio .. o 1-L,
Notes:
E

APPENDIX E
Calibration Procedures and Results

Calibration of the console dry gas meter(s), pitot tubes, nozzles diameters, and temperature
sensors were carried out in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance
Handbook. The appropriate calibration data are presented in the following pages. The nozzle
calibrations are recorded on the first page of the field data sheets.

Figure 2. Schematic of Method 5/202 Sampling Train
Meter Box Calibration Data and Calculations Forms
Pre-test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Forms
Post-test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Forms
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
Balance Calibration

Figure 2. Schematic of Method 5/202 Sampling Train
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected.operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN: Joseph Wells I INITIAL
DATE: 12/18/2023
METER PART#: I Console 51
METER SERIAL#: 26144
CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL#: 1453S
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 25.45
EauIPMENT ID#: Console #5
ORIFICE# I RUN #
0
0
0
2
3
2
3
K' TESTED
FACTOR / VACUUM
(AVG) (in Hg)
0.8137 10
0.8137 10
0.8137 10
0.5317 13
0,5317 13
0.5317 13
0.3307 13
0,3307 13
0.3307 13
DGM READINGS (FT3)
INITIAL I FINAL I NET <Vm)
61.712
70.918
77.963
39,754
44.884
53,841
92.841
100.319
110.209
70.918
77.963
92,694
44.884
53.841
61.606
100.319
110.209
117,677
9.206
7,045
14,731
5.130
8.957
7.765
7.478
9.890
7.468
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
TEMPERATURES °F
AMBIENT/ DGM INLET I DGM OUTLET
INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL
n ~ 1H ~ ~
n 1~ 112 ~ ~
n 1W 115 ~ N
72 n ~ ~ N
72 ~ ~ N M
72 N WO M ~
75 81 85 78 83
75 85 94 83 88
75 94 98 88 91
DGM
AVG
96.0
100.0
102,5
75.0
83.3
90.0
81.8
87.5
92.8
2024 Pre-Calibration
FINAL AVG (Pba,)
25.45 1 25.45 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
l
(1) (2) (3) y
Vm (STD) Voc(STD) y VARIATION(%)
7.4955 7.4023 0,988
5.6950 5.6078 0.985
13.00 2.70 11.8552 11.6643 0.984
AVG= 0.985 -0.08
7.25 4.3210 4.2546 0.985
12.50 7.4298 7.3356 0.987
10.75 1.10 6,3619 6,3086 0.992
AVG= 0.988 0.17
16.75 0.40 6.2076 6.0966 0.982
22.00 0.40 8.1236 8.0074 0.986
16.50 0.40 6.0759 6.0056 0.988
AVG= 0.985 -0.08
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, V m (std), and the critical orifice,
V" (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y . .These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = I 0.986
(1)
(2)
(3)
Vtn,,.,,,, = K, * Vm* Pbar+ {/\ff /1.3.6)
Tm
= Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 = 17.64 'R/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 'Kimm Hg (Metric)
Vcrvun = K'* :f!..bar * H Jj-:;;;;;-;;-
Vcr(.~l:l}
y:;;:; V1nlsldj
Tm= Absolute DGM avg. temperature ('R -English, "K -Metric)
= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard condttions
T amb = Absolute ambient temperature ('R -English, "K -Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration
= DGM calibration factor
AVERAGELI.H@-! 1.471
LI.H@ = ( 0.75 0 )2 AH (Vm(std))
Vc,(std) Vm
TEMPERATURESENSORS°F
REFERENCE IN OUT
32 33 32
72 73 73
203 203 202
1.536
1.525
1.518
~
1.490
1.472
Mi!!
1.395
1,382
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN: M. McNamara
DATE: . 9/26/2024 METER SERIAL #: 26144
METER PART#: Console 5 :RITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 14535
K' TESTED
FACTOR J VACUUM DGM READINGS JFT'l
ORIFICE# I RUN# (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL
C:l
□d~±~~
□:§~
0.8137 12
0.8137 12
0.8137 12
74.855 80.330
80.330 85.803
85.803 94.582
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
NET(Vm)
5.475
5.473
8.779
INITIAL
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 25.45
Eau1PMENT 1D #: Console #5
TEMPERATURES °F
AMBIENT! DGM INLET I DGM OUTLET I DGM
INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG
74 75 76 82 87
75 76 76 87 92
76 76 78 92 97
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
80.0
82.8
85.8
FINAL
25.45
ELAPSED
TIME(MIN)
0
5.000
5.000
8.000
AVG(P,ac)
25.45
2.70
2.70
2.70 §§ §§
(1)
Vm(STD)
4.5899
4.5649
7.2821
Post Calibration
Staker, Big Water, UT.
IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
l
(2) (3) y
Vcc(STD) y VARIATION ('t,r
4.4821 0.977
4.4779 0.981
7.1579 0.983
AVG= 0.980 0.00
'
AVG=
AVG=
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM. Vm (std), and the critical orifice, Va
(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automaticall'f calculated in the spreadsheet above. AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = I 0.980
(1)
(2)
(3)
V111,,,_
11
= K, "'-Vm*Pbar + (!J.H !13.6)
Tm
= K'* Pbm· * 0
✓'Tamb
= Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 = 17.64 °Rfln. Hg (English), 0.3858 °K/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm= Absolute DGM avg. temperature (0R -English, °K -Metric)
= Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (0R-English, °K-Metric)
K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration
VCJ·(.s¼ Y---= DGM calibration factor
-VlntH>.?)
AVERAGEAH@=I 1.579 i
6.Han=
( 0.75 6 )2 AH (Vm{stdj)
V"(std) Vm
TEMPERATURE SENSORS °F
REFERENCE IN OUT
1.584
1.579
1.574
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date: -------'-I /_:.\.::.6/_2_02_4 __ Pitot Tube Identification: _____ .::.3.::.8..cG;__ ___ _
o, Technician: M. McNamara 'f t=~S _ _l:: D= 0.375 in. ls PA= Pa ? ____ Y_e_s ___ _
___:.'--------Is 1.05 • D, S PA & Pn S 1.50 • D, ? ____ Y_ce..:.s ___ _
0.479 in.
P8 = 0.479 in.
a1< 10° a 1= _____ _
<12 < I 0° <12 = _____ _
z::c;0,125 in. Z = __ o_;_,;'.c,0_18 __ in.
W ::c;0,03125 in. W = 0.002 111, ------
' ' ~"'~.-.. ---
~-~~~~!] :
W> 3 inches
Z > 3/4 inch
W= 4 in. ------
Z = __ o_.8_7_5 __ in,
--_ Y 2': 3 inches Y = _ ___.:;.3__:..3_/4 __ in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of0.84? Yes
Temperature Sensor Calibration
Reference· Omega CL35 l 2A
Continuity Check Yes Probe Heat Check 248 Yes
1emperaure I emperamre 1 emperature
Source l{eference Sensor Difference
(Medium) ("F) ("F) (OF)
Probe AIR 64 64 0
AIR 64 63 I
ICE WATER 33 33 0 Stack BOIL WATER 204 205 I
SILICONE OIL
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date: -------1/16/2024 Pitot Tube Identification: _____ 3_8_G_-_2 ____ _
Technician: M. McNamara
0.456 in.
P8 = 0.456 in.
a 1 < 10° a1 = ------
a2<100 a2= ------
132 < 5°
Z ~ 0.125 in. Z = 0.012 in. ------
W ~ 0.03125 in. W = 0.008 in. ------
W > 3 inches W= 6 in. ------
Z > 3/4 inch Z = 0.875 in. ------
+--L_____ Y::: 3 inches Y = 4 J/2 Ill. ------
The pilol Lube meels the specifications for a calibration factor of0.849 Yes
Temperature Sensor Calibration
Reference: Omega CL3512A
Probe Continuity Check Yes
Heat Check 248 Yes
1 emperamre 1emperamre 1emperamre
Source Kererence :,ensor Difference
(Medium) ("F) ("F) (OF)
Probe AIR 71 70 I
AIR 71 72 I
Stack ICE WATER 33 33 0
BOIL WATER 204 204 0
SILICONE OIL -
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
Date: 1/2/24 Calibrator: Xuan N. Dang Reference: Omega CL3512A
Thermocouple Temperature Temperature Temperature
Unit ID Location Source Reference Sensor Difference
(Medium) ("F) ("F) ("F)
Oven (3) Water 33 33 0
A Water 203 201 -2
Water 33 33 ~ Oven (4) Water 203 201
Oven (3) Water 33 33
B Water 203 202 I
Water 33 33 ~ Oven (4) Water 203 201
Oven (3) Water 33 33
C Water 203 203
Water 33 33 ~ Oven (4) Water 203 203
Oven (3) Water 33 33
D Water 203 203
Water 33 33 ~ Oven (4) Water 203 203
Oven (3) Water 33 33
E Water 203 203
Water 33 33 0 Oven (4) Water 203 203 0
F Oven Water 33 33 0
Water 203 202 -I
G Oven Water 33 33 0
Water 203 202 -I
H Oven Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
:;.tii1:) Impinger Out A Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
Water 33 33 0 ;,: Impinger Out B Water 203 202 -I
i;1 Impinger Out C Water 33 33 0
. . .. . i:;&i'fi Water 203 202 -1
. ··:•, '"'}?L: Impinger Out D Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
.it; Jmpinger Out E Water 33 34 1
·:DJ> Water 203 203 0
· : •iiF Impinger Out F Water 33 33 0
Js;?f,~ Water 203 201 -2
Impinger Out G Water 33 33 0
•: Water 203 202 -1
~(;1 lmpinger Out H Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
2~ lmpinger Out I Water 33 33 0
Water 203 203 0
•: Water 33 33 0 '., Impinger Out J . '}';;;; Water 203 203 0
tf( Impinger Out K Water 33 33 0
•· .J•: Water 203 203 0
TETCO
Annual Balance Calibration Check
Date 1/23/24
Balance Denver Instruments, Model A-250, SN B045284
Weights Used Troemner Weight Set,
SN 98-115146
Certified Weight
grams
0.1000
0.5000
1.0000
10.0000
50.0000
100.0000
120.0000
150.0000
Technician Michael McNamara
Measured Weight
grams
0.1000
0.5000
1.0000
10.0000
50.0001
100.0000
120.0001
150.0000
Difference
grams
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
-0.0001
0.0000
-0.0001
0.0000
F

APPENDIX F
Protocol and Related Correspondence

\
State of Utah
SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor
August 30) 2024
Chris Rose
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director
Staker Parson Companies
89 West I 3490 South, Suite 100
Draper, UT 84020
Dear Mr. Rose:
DAQC-890-24
Site ID 11796 (B4)
Re: Staker Parson Companies (dba Western Rock Products)-Big Water/400 TPH Parallel
Flow Asphalt Plant Baghouse -Protocol Review and Test Date Confirmation -Kane
County, UT
The testing protocol for one (1) 400 TPH Parallel Flow Asphalt Plant Baghouse at 0.5 miles north
of Highway 89 on Ethan Alane Street, Big Water in Kane County, UT, dated August 23, 2024, has
been reviewed and found acceptable. The agreed upon test date is September 23, 2024.
Acceptance of a protocol does not relieve the owner/operator and the testing contractor from strict
adherence to all applicable EPA methods, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) policies, Utah Air
Quality Rules (UAQR), and methods approved by the Director. Any deviation from EPA
methods, DAQ policies, UAQR, and methods approved by the Director must be addressed
separately and express written consent given prior to commencement of testing.
The DAQ requires that all test reports include a statement that:
A. Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions
specified in the applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation.
B. During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained
process conditions representative of normal operations, and operated under such
other relevant conditions specified by the Director.
C. Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements
and information contained in the report are true, accurate, and complete.
· 195 North 1950 West• Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone (80 I) 536-4000 • Fax (80 l) 536-4099 • T.D.D. (80 l) 903-3978
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
DAQC-890-24
Page 2
If you have any questions, call me at [phone] or e-mail me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Paul Bushman, Environmental Scientist
Division of Air Quality
PB:jl
cc: Southwest Utah Public Health Department

1
COMPLIANCE EMISSION TESTING PROTOCOL
STAKER PARSON COMPANIES (DBA WESTERN ROCK PRODUCTS)
BMG 400 TPH PARALLEL FLOW ASPHALT PLANT BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
BIG WATER, UTAH

Project Organization and Responsibility

The following personnel and the testing contractor are presently anticipated to be involved in the
testing program. The Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) may have their own
personnel to observe all phases including the process.

Company Contacts
Staker Parsons Companies Chris Rose 385 400-2119
89 West 134900 South Suite 100
Draper, UT 84020

Facility Location
Big Water, UT

Test Contractor:
TETCO Dean Kitchen [phone]
391 East 620 South
American Fork, UT 84003

Facility Location

The facility is located in Big Water, UT. The source to be tested a 400 tph BMG asphalt plant
baghouse exhaust.

Test Purpose and Methods Applied

This test will be conducted to determine compliance with the PM10 emission limit for the asphalt
plant baghouse exhaust as established in the facility=s Utah Department of Environmental Quality,
Division of Air Quality Approval Order DAQE-209-96, dated February 23, 1996.

Testing procedures will include accumulating process and production data as well as testing for
PM10 particulate matter emissions using EPA Methods 5 and 202 with all the filterable particulate
captured counted as PM10. Condensable particulate matter (CPM) will not be used for
compliance demonstration but shall be used for inventory purposes.

2
Test Date and Time

It is planned to complete all testing the week of September 23, 2024. It is anticipated that the test
crew will arrive, set up the test equipment, and begin testing on the 3rd and continue as needed.

Operational Data and Instrumentation

Copies of all operational and instrumentation data will be made available to agency personnel.
Production will be monitored and recorded by Western Rock personnel. Asphalt production,
pressure drop, and percent recycle will be recorded during the test.

Access to Sample Site

The sample site is accessed by stairs and ladders, or man-basket.

Potential Hazards

Moving Equipment - Yes
Hot Equipment - Yes
Chemical - No

Test Site

See Appendix A for a stack diagram.

Estimates of Test Parameters

Stack flow 23, 000 dscfm
Moisture 25%
Stack Temperature 300oF

Test Procedures

PM Measurements

The following are the procedures that TETCO will follow for the Method 5/202 compliance tests:

1. The dimensions of the rectangular stack are reported as 47 by 35 inches. Five sample
ports are located 82 inches (2.04 diameters) downstream and 48 inches (1.19 diameters)

3
upstream from any flow disturbance. Dimensions will be confirmed at the time of the test.
It is planned to sample 5 sample points per port, or a total of 25 sample points.

2. EPA Method 2 will be used to determine the gas stream velocity. The type "S" pitot tubes
will be used with a Cp factor of 0.84. Dual inclined/vertical manometers with graduations
in .01 of an inch of water will be used. If the measured pressure differential is below 0.05
inches of water a more sensitive manometer will be used with graduation marks of 0.005
inches of water. Direction of gas flow will be checked for gas cyclonics prior to testing.

3. EPA Method 3 will be used to determine the gas stream dry molecular weight. A sample
will be collected in a gas bag and will be analyzed by Orsat/Fyrite at the test=s conclusion.
The gas sample will be taken immediately following the console critical orifice.

4. EPA Method 4 will be used to determine the gas stream moisture content.

5. EPA Method 5 will be used to measure the particulate matter emission rate. The
minimum run duration will be 60 minutes, and the minimum sample volume will be 31.8
dry standard cubic feet.

6. The glass fiber filters that will be used meet the specifications required of the method.

7. The probe liners will be stainless steel.

8. EPA Method 202 will be used to measure condensable emissions in the back-half
catch.

9. The barometric pressure will be measured with a barometer which is periodically checked
against a mercury barometer. The barometer will be checked prior to testing to assure an
accurate barometric pressure.

10. Current calibration data is submitted with this protocol. Nozzle calibration which will be
done at the test site. Nozzle calibration will be included on the first page of each set of run
sheets for each respective test run. Any calibration that is not current will be re-calibrated
prior to the test dates.

11. Any necessary preparation and clean-up by the contractor will be performed in the
contractor's sampling trailer. The laboratory work and analysis will be done by the
contractor as soon as possible after the test project at 391East 620 South, American Fork,
Utah.

Quality Assurance

All testing and analysis in these tests will be conducted according to Methods 5 and 202 and
appropriate sections of the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement

4
Systems Volume III.

Reporting

Reporting will be prepared by the testing contractor according to EPA Quality Assurance
Guidelines. Complete copies of raw data, calculations and summary of the test will be included in
the test report. All process and production data will be recorded and retained for inspection and
copying by UDEQ. The reports will be submitted to UDEQ within 30 days following completion
of the test.

5
Appendix A

Calibration Data
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES
1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.
2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.
3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time
necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.
4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.
TECHNICIAN:INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)
DATE:12/21/2023 METER SERIAL #:300315 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg):25.55 25.65 25.60 IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00%,
METER PART #:Console 3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #:1453S EQUIPMENT ID #:ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED
K'TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED
FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3)AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN)DGM DH (1)(2)(3)Y
ORIFICE #RUN #(AVG)(in Hg)INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm)INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG q (in H2O)Vm (STD)Vcr (STD)Y VARIATION (%)DH@
1 0.8137 10 100.418 105.533 5.115 71 82 87 75 78 80.5 4.759 3.00 4.3128 4.3028 0.998 1.740
2 0.8137 10 105.533 110.912 5.379 72 85 89 78 81 83.3 5.012 3.00 4.5125 4.5278 1.003 1.735
3 0.8137 10 110.912 117.512 6.600 72 90 93 80 83 86.5 6.081 3.00 5.5038 5.4935 0.998 1.724
AVG = 1.000 -0.18
1 0.5317 11 83.911 89.115 5.204 69 69 75 66 70 70.0 7.477 1.22 4.4522 4.4262 0.994 1.675
2 0.5317 11 89.115 94.226 5.111 71 74 79 71 74 74.5 7.282 1.22 4.3358 4.3027 0.992 1.668
3 0.5317 11 94.226 99.407 5.181 72 79 83 74 75 77.8 7.332 1.22 4.3686 4.3281 0.991 1.661
AVG = 0.992 -0.91
1 0.3307 13 117.962 123.015 5.053 74 90 89 82 84 86.3 11.603 0.45 4.1851 4.2521 1.016 1.561
2 0.3307 13 123.015 128.053 5.038 75 88 89 84 86 86.8 11.514 0.45 4.1688 4.2155 1.011 1.563
3 0.3307 13 128.053 133.107 5.054 75 89 90 86 87 88.0 11.508 0.45 4.1725 4.2133 1.010 1.559
AVG = 1.012 1.08
AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = 1.001
AVERAGE DH@ = 1.654
(1)=Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions
K1 =17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)
Tm =Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) DH@ = 0.75 q DH Vm(std)
Vcr(std) Vm
(2)=Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions
Tamb =Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)
Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration REFERENCE IN OUT
(3)=DGM calibration factor 32 33 32
62 63 63
204 205 205
TEMPERATURE SENSORS oF
2024 Pre-Calibration
Console #3
30
19
12
D Kitchen
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY
USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:
The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical orifice, Vcr(std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above.
()2 ()
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.479
PB =0.479
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
TemperatureSource Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 64 64
AIR 64 63
ICE WATER 33 33
BOIL WATER 204 205
SILICONE OIL
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
1
0
1Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature TemperatureDifference
(oF)
0
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.002
4
0.875
3 3/4
1/16/2024 38 G
M. McNamara
in.
0.018
1
1
2
1
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data
Date:Pitot Tube Identification:
Technician:
Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ?
Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ?
PA = 0.476
PB =0.476
a1 < 10o a1 = o
a2 < 10o a2 = o
b1 < 5o b1 = o
b2 < 5o b2 = o
Z  0.125 in.Z = in.
W W  0.03125 in.W = in.
W > 3 inches W = in.
Z > 3/4 inch Z = in.
Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in.
The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes
Reference:
TemperatureSource Reference Sensor
(Medium)(oF)(oF)
Probe AIR 63 62
AIR 64 62
ICE WATER 33 34
BOIL WATER 204 204
SILICONE OIL
1/16/2024 51 G
M. McNamara
in.
0.002
2
0
1
1
1
in.
in.
Yes
Yes
0.004
5
1
3 1/2
Heat Check 248
Temperature Sensor Calibration
2
1
0Stack
Omega CL3512A
Probe Yes
Yes
Continuity Check
Temperature TemperatureDifference
(oF)
b2
b1
B
A
w
Dt
PA
PB
Date:1/2/24 Calibrator:Reference:
Temperature Temperature
Source Difference
(Medium)(oF)
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 1
Water 0
Water 0
Water -2
Water 0
Water -1
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
Water 0
202
33 33
Impinger Out K 33 33
203 203
33 33
Impinger Out J
Impinger Out H
Impinger Out I
33
203
33
203
33
203
33
203
203
201
33
G
H
Oven (3)33 33
203 203
Oven (4)33
203
Oven 33 33
203 203
Oven 33 33
33
203 202
Oven (3)
A
201203
33
Oven (3)33 33
Oven (4)
Thermocouple
Location
203 201
Impinger Out F 33 33
203
203
203
203 202
203 203
33
33
Impinger Out G
203 201
Oven (3)33
203 203
33 33
203Oven (4)
203
Impinger Out D 33 33
203 203
Impinger Out E 33 34
203 203
203
33 33
203Impinger Out B
Impinger Out C 33 33
203 202
202
Impinger Out A 33 33
203
Oven (3)
Oven (4)
TETCO
Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration
B
C 203 203
33 33
33 33
203
33 33
Xuan N. Dang Omega CL3512A
Unit ID Reference
(oF)
Sensor
(oF)
Temperature
33
D
E
Oven 33 33
203 202F
Oven (4)
Balance Denver Instruments, Model A-250, SN B045284
Weights Used Troemner Weight Set,
SN 98-115146
Certified Weight Measured Weight Difference
grams grams grams
0.1000 0.1000 0.0000
0.5000 0.5000 0.0000
1.0000 1.0000 0.0000
10.0000 10.0000 0.0000
50.0000 50.0001 -0.0001
100.0000 100.0000 0.0000
120.0000 120.0001 -0.0001
150.0000 150.0000 0.0000
Technician Michael McNamara
TETCO
Annual Balance Calibration Check
Date 1/23/24