Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2024-005046 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144840 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4840 Telephone (801) 536-4100 • Fax (801) 359-8853 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4284 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper State of Utah SPENCER J. COX Governor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor Department of Environmental Quality Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION Brent H. Everett Director ERRC-033-24 March 15, 2024 Chris Zarek Liberty Corner Associates, LLC 1229 – 1265 South 300 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Re: Liberty Corner Site Characterization Report Comments 1229 – 1265 South 300 West, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah Dear Mr. Zarek: The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has reviewed the following document as required by the provisions of the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP): ● Site Characterization Report, by Atlas Technical Consultants LLC, dated January 18, 2024. Based on the review of the document, the DERR has enclosed comments to gather additional information about the characterization work and the associated data. Please address the comments and submit a revised Site Characterization Report for review. Thank you for your participation in the VCP. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed comments, please contact me at (801) 536-4100. Sincerely, Lincoln Grevengoed, Project Manager Division of Environmental Response and Remediation LGG/tt cc: Ron Lund, Environmental Health Director, Salt Lake County Health Department Lincoln Grevengoed (Mar 15, 2024 09:46 MDT) Lincoln Grevengoed Page 2 DERR Review Comments Site Characterization Report– Liberty Corner Voluntary Cleanup Site General Comment 1. In order to provide context to the reader, please briefly describe the geological/hydrogeological data derived from the borings installed across the property. 2. Please note that TRPH was detected at SB-17 at a concentration of 13,500 ug/L. SB-17 does not appear to be downgradient of any detected source and is located underneath a current building. In addition, metals and benzo(a)pyrene were detected underneath some of the buildings as well. Further sampling for the source of the TRPH and the extent of the other contaminants will be necessary after the removal of the buildings and the pavement. Please note this in the text. 3. Please coordinate with the DERR on a proposed risk assessment before the document is submitted. 4. For future building demolition and cleanup work, please see the following fact sheets that will be helpful under the VCP. Among others, surface soils should be evaluated due to historical activities and metals were detected at the property. Tips for Building Demolition Remedial Action Plan Guidance Specific Comments 1. Section 1.3, Page 1: There does not appear to be a Section 1.3. The text skips from Section 1.2 to Section 1.4. If there is a Section 1.3, please include it in the revised document. If not, please correct the numbering of the sections in order to avoid confusion. 2. Section 3.2, Soil Analysis Summary, Page 7: The EPA has recently changed the guidance for lead at residential sites to 200 mg/kg. Please replace the old EPA Residential RSL with the new concentration and screen the Site data accordingly. 3. Section 3.2, Soil Analysis Summary, Page 7: The text states that the highest concentration of arsenic at the Site was 18.1 mg/kg. However, Table 5 lists arsenic at SB-12 @ 2-3’ as being 32.6 mg/kg. Please correct the text. 4. Section 3.4, Groundwater Gradient Analysis, Page 8: The text states that groundwater elevation data is summarized in Table 3. However, the Table of Contents states that the groundwater elevation data is presented in Table 1. Please make sure that the text and the Table of Contents match. 5. Section 3.4, Page 8: The text and the Table of Contents lists Section 3.4 twice, Groundwater Gradient Analysis and Data Validation and Assessment. To avoid confusion, please have only one of these sections listed as 3.4 and correct the numbering accordingly. 6. Tables: Table 1 Groundwater Elevation and Monitoring Well Completion Details appear to be missing from the report. This data is not listed in any of the other tables. Please resubmit the report with the missing table included. 7. Maps: Please add maps showing the extent of contamination above screening levels in both groundwater and soil. 8. Appendix C, Laboratory Reports, Pages 237/2647 and 196/3323: The Chain of Custody form appears to indicate that the sample jars were not received intact. The lab does not Page 3 mention this as an issue in the Case Narrative and this specific issue is not mentioned in the text. Please specify in the text why the lab marked the samples as “NCF”. 9. Appendix C, Laboratory Reports: The DERR was unable to find the laboratory reports covering the fractionation of SB-23. Please either provide the DERR with the pages covering the fractionation or, if any lab report(s) are missing, please attach the missing report(s).