DRC-2013-003540 - 0901a068803d892b

Sent VIA Federal Express
November 19,2013
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Director
Utah Water Quality Board
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144810
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd. Suite 600
Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
303 974 2140
www .energyfuels.com
Re: Transmittal of Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring
Report for 2013 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as
two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
~;;;~
ENERGY FUELS RESOURCES (USA) INC.
Kathy Weinel
Quality Assurance Manager
CC: David C. Frydenlund
JoAnn Tischler
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Uranium Mill
2013 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Prepared by:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228
November 19, 2013
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... I
2.0 SAMPLING EVENTS .................................... -.................. -.................. -.................................................... 1
2.1 July 2013 Sampling ............................................................................................................................. I
2.2 Repeat Visits to Dry Seeps and Springs .............................................................................................. !
2.3 Sampling Procedures ........................................................................................................................... 2
2.4 Field Data ............................................................................................................................................ 3
2.5 Field QC Samples .................................................................................................. ! ............................. 3
3.0 SEEPS AND SPRINGS SURVEY AND CONTOUR MAP .................................................................. 3
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL ..................................................................... .4
4.1 Laboratory Results .............................................................................................................................. 4
4.2 DATA EVALUATION ....................................................................................................................... 4
4.3 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements ...................................................................... 5
4.4 Analyte Completeness Review ................................................................................... .-........................ 5
4.5 Data Validation ................................................................................................................................... 5
4.5.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 6
4.5.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................................................. 6
4.5.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check ...................................................................................... 6
4.5.4 Analytical Method Check .......................................... -................................................................... 6
4.5.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation .......................................................................................................... 6
4.5.6 Trip Blank Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 7
4.5.7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates ................................................................................... ?
4.5.8 Radiologies Counting Error ................................................................................... _ ....................... ?
4.5.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation ......................................................... , .......... , ........................... ?
5.0 EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL DATA .......................... _ .................. _ ........... _ .............. _ .................... 9
5.1 Evaluation of Analytical Results ......................................................................................................... 9
5.1.1 Ruin Spring .................................................................. .-................. .-.................. -....... -.................... 9
5.1.2 Cottonwood Seep ....................................................................................................................... 10
5.1.3 Entrance Spring .......................................................................................................................... 10
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ..................................................................................................... 10
6.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period ................................................................. 10
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT ................................................................................... 11
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION .......................................................................... _ ..................... 12
i
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Seeps and Springs Sampling for 2013
Table 2A Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Ruin Spring
Table 2B Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Cottonwood Seep
Table 2C Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Westwater Seep
Table 2D Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site
Monitoring Wells -Entrance Spring
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Tab B Field Parameter Measurement Data
Tab C Survey Data and Contour Map
Tab D Analytical Laboratory Data
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Tab F Comma Separated Values Transmittal
11
AWAL
DR
DRC
EFRI
GEL
GWQS
LCS
Mill
MS
MSD
Permit
QA
QAP
QC
RPD
TDS
VOCs
ACRONYM LIST
American West Analytical Laboratory
Dry Ridge Piezometers
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
GEL Laboratories, Inc.
Groundwater Quality Standard
Laboratory Control Spike
White Mesa Mill
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
Quality Assurance
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan
Quality Control
Relative Percent Difference
Total Dissolved Solids
Volatile Organic Compounds
iii
2013 ANNUAL SEEPS AND SPRINGS SAMPLING REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the 2013 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report for the Energy Fuels Resources
(USA) Inc. ("EFRI") White Mesa Mill (the "Mill"), as required under Patt I.F.7 of the Mill's
State of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "Permit") and Section 6.0 of
the Mill's Sampling Plan for Seeps and Springs in the Vicinity of the White Mesa Uranium Mill,
Revision: 0, March 17, 2009 (the "Sampling Plan") and Revision 1, June 10, 2011 ("Draft
Sampling Plan").
The Sampling Plan for Seeps and Springs in the Vicinity of the White Mesa Uranium Mill, was
revised during the 2011 reporting period. The revisions were completed to address corrective
actions delineated in the 2010 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report for the Mill. The
Draft Sampling Plan was submitted to the Utah Division of Radiation Control ("DRC") via e-
mail for review on June 10, 2011. Per conversations with DRC personnel on June 28, 2011
regarding the July 2011 sampling event, EFRI used the 2011 Draft Sampling Plan field forms for
the July 2011, the June 2012, and July 2013 sampling events. To date comments have not been
received from DRC on the 2011 Draft Sampling Plan.
2.0 SAMPLING EVENTS
Seeps and springs which were identified near the Mill in the 1978 Environmental Report (Plate
2.6-10, Dames and Moore, January 30, 1978) are to be sampled annually in accordance with the
Sampling Plan and Part I.E.6 of the Permit. The Sampling Plan specifies the following sample
locations: Corral Canyon Seep, Corral Springs, Ruin Spring, Cottonwood Seep, Westwater Seep
and Entrance Spring.
2.1 July 2013 Sampling
In accordance with the Permit and the Sampling Plan, DRC was notified of the sampling. The
DRC representative was present for this sampling event. On July 16, 2013, EFRI collected seeps
and springs samples from Cottonwood Seep, Ruin Spring, Back Spring (duplicate sample of
Ruin Spring), and Entrance Spring. The DRC representative collected a "split" sample on July
16, 2013 at Ruin Spring from the EFRI sampling equipment, using sample containers he
provided. Corral Canyon Seep, Westwater Seep, and Corral Springs were dry in 2013. The data
from the July sampling event are included as Attachment Din this report.
2.2 Repeat Visits to Dry Seeps and Springs.
During the July 16, 2013 sampling event, Westwater Seep, Corral Canyon Seep and Corral
Springs were dry, could not be sampled, and did not warrant development attempts with limited
hand tool excavation at that time. Additional visits were made to these locations on August 9,
2013 and August 20, 2013 to determine if development attempts with hand tool excavation
would yield enough water for sampling. The additional two visits did not indicate any changes;
i.e., there was no indication that development attempts would be successful.
1
2.3 Sampling Procedures
Samples were collected and analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 of the Permit.
During the July sampling event, samples were collected from the locations indicated in Table 1.
Sampling procedures for each seep or spring are determined by the site location and access.
The DRC-approved sampling procedures for seeps and springs at the Mill are contained in
Sampling Plan, Revision 0. Samples collected under this plan were collected either by direct
collection which involves collecting the sample directly into the sample container from the
surface water feature or from spring out-flow, or by using a stainless steel ladle to collect water
until a sufficient volume is contained in the ladle for transfer to the sample bottle.
Sampling Plan Revision 0, was revised in 2011 to provide flexibility in sampling procedures to
address differing site conditions as well as to correct several inconsistencies noted during the
2010 report preparation and review. EFRI provided detailed descriptions of the sampling
procedures used in 2010 in the 2010 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report for the Mill,
which was accepted by DRC. EFRI determined a revision to Sampling Plan, Revision 0 was
necessary, because the procedures in Sampling Plan, Revision 0 do not match the site conditions
and do not include the use of a peristaltic pump for sampling or filtering samples for metals and
gross alpha analyses. EFRI submitted a Draft Sampling Plan to DRC in 2011. The procedures in
the Draft Sampling Plan are consistent with the sampling procedures employed in 2010, 2011
and 2012. Samples collected under this plan are collected by direct collection, stainless steel
sample ladle, or by use of a peristaltic pump which involves collecting the sample from the
source or out-flow using the peristaltic pump. The peristaltic pump is used to deliver the sample
from the source or out-flow to the sample bottles. Filtered parameters are pumped through a
0.45 micron filter prior to delivery to the sample bottle.
EFRI employed the previous sampling procedures again in 2013, because the 2010, 2011 and
2012 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Reports for the Mill were inspected by DRC and
determined to be in compliance with the GWDP. Additionally, DRC was present during the
2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 sampling events and did not provide comments or recommendations
to modify the procedures. Since DRC has not commented on the seeps and springs sampling
procedures that were used in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, EFRI has concluded the 2010
procedures are acceptable and has continued using the procedures implemented in 2010.
Ruin Spring
In the case of Ruin Spring, sample bottles for the analytes collected during the July sampling
event (except gross alpha and heavy metals) were filled directly from the spring out-flow which
is a pipe. Samples for heavy metals and gross alpha were collected by means of a peristaltic
pump and delivered directly to the sample containers through a 0.45 micron filter. The
appropriate preservatives for the analytical technique were added to the samples.
2
Cottonwood Seep and Entrance Spring
Cottonwood Seep and Entrance Spring were "developed" the day before the sampling event by
Field Personnel. Development was completed by removing surrounding vegetation and clearing
the sampling location in the spring or seep area. For the July samples collected from Cottonwood
Seep and Entrance Spring, the samples for Volatile Organic Compounds ("VOCs") were
collected by means of a peristaltic pump and delivered directly to the sample containers. In the
case of the samples for heavy metals and gross alpha, the samples were delivered by a peristaltic
pump directly to the sample containers through a 0.45 micron filter. The other samples were
filled by dipping the bottles into the developed and cleared sample depression. The samples
were preserved by the addition of the appropriate preservative for the analytical technique.
The tubing on the peristaltic pump that comes into contact with the sample water was disposed of
between each sampling. As a result, no equipment required decontamination, and no rinsate
samples were collected.
2.4 Field Data
Attached under Tab A are copies of the field data sheets recorded in association with the July
seeps and springs monitoring events. Photographic documentation of the sampling sites is also
included in Tab A. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1 and field parameters collected during the
sampling program are included in Tab B.
2.5 Field QC Samples
The field Quality Control ("QC") samples generated during this sampling event included one
duplicate per sampling event and one trip blank per shipment to each laboratory which received
samples for VOCs. The duplicate samples (Back Spring) were submitted blind to the analytical
laboratory. As previously stated, no rinsate blanks were collected during this sampling event as
only disposable equipment was used for sample collection.
3.0 SEEPS AND SPRINGS SURVEY AND CONTOUR MAP
Part I.F.7(c) of the Permit requires that a water table contour map that includes the elevations for
each well at the facility and the elevations of the phreatic surfaces observed for each of the seeps
and springs sampled be submitted with this annual report. Tab C includes two contour maps.
The contour map labeled C-1, shows the water table without the water level data associated with
the dry ridge ("DR") investigation piezometers. The contour map labeled C-2 shows the water
table with the water level data associated with the DR investigation piezometers. It is important
to note that Cottonwood Seep is not included in any of the perched water level contouring,
because there is no evidence to establish a hydraulic connection between Cottonwood Seep and
the perched water system. Cottonwood Seep is located near the Brushy Basin
Member/Westwater Canyon Member contact, approximately 230 feet below the base of the
perched water system defined by the Burro Canyon Formation/Brushy Basin Member contact.
The stratigraphic position of Cottonwood Seep indicates that its elevation is not representative of
the perched potentiometric surface. Exclusion of the Cottonwood Seep from water level
3
contouring is consistent with previous submissions. The contour map includes the corrected
survey data from December 2009 as discussed below.
Part I.F.7 (g) of the Permit requires that survey data for the seeps and springs be collected prior
to the collection of samples. DRC previously clarified that the requirement to submit survey data
applies only to the first sampling event and not on an annual basis. The December 2009 and July
2010 seeps and springs survey data shown in Tab C will be used for reporting where seeps and
springs locations and elevations are relevant.
A full discussion of the survey data and the hydrogeology of seeps and springs at the margins of
White Mesa in the vicinity of the Mill and the relationship of these seeps and springs to the
hydrogeology of the site, in particular to the occurrence of a relatively shallow perched
groundwater zone beneath the site, is contained in Hydrogeology of the Perched Groundwater
Zone and Associated Seeps and Springs Near the White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, dated
November 12, 2010, prepared by Hydro Geo Chern, Inc. and submitted to the Director on
November 15, 2010. Additional information is also contained in the Second Revision
Hydrogeology of the Perched Groundwater Zone in the Area Southwest of the Tailings Cells
While Mesa Mill Site, dated November 7, 2012, prepared by Hydro Geo Chern, Inc. and
submitted to the Director on November 7, 2012.
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
4.1 Laboratory Results
Analytical results are provided by the Mill's two contract analytical laboratories GEL
Laboratories, Inc., ("GEL") and American West Analytical Laboratory ("AWAL").
The laboratories utilized during this investigation were certified under the Environmental Lab
Certification Program administered by UDEQ Bureau of Lab Improvement for the analyses they
completed.
The analytical data as well as the laboratory Quality Assurance ("QA")/QC summaries are
included under Tab D.
4.2 DATA EVALUATION
The Permit requires that the annual seeps and springs sampling program be conducted in
compliance with the requirements specified in the Mill's approved White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan ("QAP"), Revision 7.2, dated June 6, 2012, the
approved Sampling Plan and the Permit. To meet this requirement, the data validation
completed for the seeps and springs sampling program verified that the program met the
requirements outlined in the QAP, the Permit and the approved Sampling Plan. The 2010
Annual Seeps and Springs Monitoring Report noted that in several places the requirements in the
QAP and Sampling Plan, Revision 0, were in conflict. To address these inconsistencies, the
Sampling Plan, Revision 0 was revised and, as previously stated, submitted to DRC for review in
June 2011. For the purposes of this data review, the Permit and the QAP requirements were used
4
to determine compliance. The Mill QA Manager performed a QA/QC review to confirm
compliance of the monitoring program with requirements of the Permit and the QAP. As
required in the QAP, data QA includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field,
review of field procedures, an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of
laboratory data methods and data. Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is
provided in Section 4.5.1. Discussion of adherence to the Sampling Plan is provided in Section
4.3. Analytical completeness review results are provided in Section 4.4. The steps and tests
applied to check laboratory data QA/QC are discussed in Sections 4.5.1 through 4.5.9 below.
The analytical laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QA/QC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Conference certification and reporting protocol. The analytical laboratory QA/QC
Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain of Custody and Analytical Request
Record forms for each set of analytical results, follow the analytical results under Tab D. Results
of the review of the laboratory QA/QC information are provided under Tab E and discussed in
Section 4.5 below.
4.3 Adherence to Sampling Plan and Permit Requirements
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the Permit, the QA Manager observed that
QAJQC requirements established in the Permit and the QAP were met and that the requirements
were implemented as required except, as noted below.
Sampling procedures varied from those contemplated in the Revision 0, Sampling Plan as
discussed in the 2010 Annual Seeps and Springs Sampling Report for the Mill. As previously
stated, the Sampling Plan, Revision 0 was revised in June 2011 to accurately reflect the sampling
procedures used during the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 sampling events. DRC has not
provided comments on the Sampling Plan to date; however, the DRC representative was present
for the 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 sampling programs and observed the sampling procedures
used. The DRC representative accepted the procedures and made no comments regarding the
sampling strategies employed. No further discussions regarding the changes to the Revision 0
Sampling Plan sampling procedures are included.
The Permit only requires the measurement of the field parameters pH, conductivity and
temperature. Field parameter measurements collected during this sampling event included pH,
conductivity, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. The collection of additional field
parameters resulted in no effect on the usability of the data.
4.4 Analyte Completeness Review
The analyses required by the Permit Table 2 were completed.
4.5 Data Validation
The QAP and the Permit identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the seeps and springs monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements, the
QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a receipt
5
temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a repotting limit check, a
trip blank check, a QA/QC evaluation of sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QA/QC information. Each evaluation is
discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results of each test are
provided under Tab E.
4.5.1 Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of field recorded parameters to assess their adherence with
QAP and Permit requirements. The assessment involved review of the Field Data sheets. Review
of the Field Data Sheets noted that the requirements for field data collection were met.
4.5.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample holding
time checks are provided under Tab E. The samples were received and analyzed within the
required holding time.
4.5.3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Chain of Custody sheets were reviewed to confirm compliance with the sample receipt
requirements specified in the QAP. Sample receipt temperature checks are provided under Tab
E. The samples were received within the QAP required temperature limit.
4.5.4 Analytical Method Check
The analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required methods
specified in Table 1 of the QAP. Analytical method check results are provided in Tab E.
4.5.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
Reporting limits utilized by the laboratory were required to be equal to or lower than the GWQSs
set out in Table 2 of the Permit. For Total Dissolved Solids ("TDS"), sulfate and chloride, for
which Ground Water Quality Standards are not set out in Table 2 of the Permit, reporting limits
specified in Part l.E.6.e).(l) were used. Those reporting limits are 10 mg/L for TDS, and 1 mg/L
for Sulfate and Chloride. The analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories
were checked against the reporting limits specified in the Permit. Reporting limit evaluations are
provided in Tab E. All analytes were measured and repmted to the required reporting limits
except the sample results that had the reporting limit raised due to sample dilution necessary to
accommodate the analyte concentrations in the samples. In all cases the repotted value for the
analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
6
4.5.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
The trip blank results were reviewed to identify any blank contamination. Trip blank evaluation
is provided in Tab E. The trip blank results associated with the samples were less than reporting
limit for the VOCs.
4.5.7 QA/QC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that the Relative Percent Difference ("RPD") will be
calculated for the comparison of duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits
for RPDs between the duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the
measured results (described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
limit. This standard is based on the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency Contract
Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994,
9240.1-05-01 as cited in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for duplicate pairs for the analytes
regardless of whether or not the reported concentrations are greater than 5 times the required
detection limits; however, data will be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater
than 5 times the required detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. RPDs are also only
calculated when both the sample and the duplicate report a detection for any given analyte. If
only one of the pair reports a detection, the RPD cannot be calculated. The additional duplicate
information is provided for information purposes.
The duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the seeps and springs samples.
4.5.8 Radiologies Counting Error
Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity equal to
or greater than the Groundwater Compliance Limits set out in the Permit (for the seeps and
springs samples the Groundwater Quality Standards ["GWQS"] will be used), shall have a
counting variance that is equal to or less than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An
error term may be greater than 20% of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the
activity concentration and error term is less than or equal to the GWQS.
Section 9.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided in the text.
Results of routine radiologic sample QC are provided under Tab E. The seeps and springs
radiologic sample results that had positive detections met the QAP specified criteria for
radiological counting error. However, the only positive detection was still below the GWQS.
The duplicate samples were nondetect, and as such the duplicate comparability check specified
in the QAP does not apply.
4.5.9 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QA/QC Manager check the following items
in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct and complete, (2)
7
analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate analytical laboratory procedures are
followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5) QC samples are within established
control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7) special sample preparation and analytical
requirements have been met, and (8) documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory
checks described above, EFRI's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and
(6)) to confirm that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike
duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative sufficiently
explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check are provided under
Tab E. The lab QA/QC results from both GEL and A W AL met these requirements except as
described below.
A number of the seeps and springs samples had the reporting limit raised due to matrix
interference and/or sample dilution. In all cases where the detection limit was increased, the
concentration for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit.
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control spike
("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the equivalent, where
applicable. It should be noted that:
• Laboratory fortified blanks are equivalent to LCSs.
• Laboratory reagent blanks are equivalent to method blanks.
• Post digestion spikes are equivalent to MSs.
• Post digestion spike duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
• For method E900.1, used to determine gross alpha, a sample duplicate was used instead
ofaMSD.
The qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QA/QC Summary Reports for
any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods, were reviewed by the QA Manager.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD pair be analyzed with each analytical batch.
The QAP does not specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify
that the MS/MSD pair be prepared on EFRI samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are
set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the data
packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical
batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were reviewed for compliance
with each laboratory's established acceptance limits. The QAP does not require this level of
review and the results of this review are provided for information only.
The information from the Laboratory QA/QC Summary Reports indicates that the MS/MSDs
recoveries and the associated RPDs for the seeps and springs samples were within acceptable
laboratory limits except as noted in Tab E. One MS/MSD recovery was outside the laboratory
established acceptance limits. This result does not affect the quality or usability of the data
because the recoveries were above the acceptance limits which is indicative of matrix
interference. The MS/MSD recoveries above the laboratory established acceptance limits,
indicate a high bias to the individual sample results. A high bias means that reported results may
8
be higher than the actual results. The QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each
analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant with the QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses, but the
QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The analytical data associated
with the routine quarterly sampling met the requirement specified in the QAP. The information
from the Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports indicates that the sunogate recoveries for the
seeps and springs samples were within acceptable laboratory limits for all surrogate compounds.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a reagent
blank. Contamination detected in analysis of reagent blanks/method blanks will be used to
evaluate any analytical laboratory contamination of environmental samples. The QAP specified
process for evaluation of reagent/method blanks states that nonconformance will exist when
blanks are within an order of magnitude of the sample results. No analytes were reported above
the reporting limit in the reagent/method blanks from either laboratory.
5.0 EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL DATA
Analytical Results
As previously stated, the samples were analyzed for the groundwater compliance parameters
found on Table 2 of the Permit. In addition to these laboratory parameters, the pH, temperature,
conductivity, (and although not required, redox and turbidity) were measured and recorded in the
field.
The samples were not analyzed for semivolatile organic compounds. Although the Sampling
Plan, Revision 0, cun·ently states that the samples will also be analyzed for semivolatile organic
compounds, the Permit was revised to eliminate the requirement for semivolatile analysis. The
requirement to analyze the seeps and springs samples for semivolatile organic compounds has
also been eliminated from the Draft Sampling Plan, Revision 1.
5.1 Evaluation of Analytical Results
The results of the July sampling event show no evidence of Mill influence in the water produced
by the seeps and springs sampled. The lack of Mill influence on seeps and springs is indicated
by the fact that the parameters detected are within the ranges of concentrations for the on-site
monitoring wells and for available historic data for the seeps and springs themselves. For those
detected analytes, concentrations are shown in Tables 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D. The data are
compared to available historic data for each seep and spring as well as to on-site monitoring well
data. Specific discussions about each seep or spring are included below.
5.1.1 Ruin Spring
No VOCs or radiologies were detected. Metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only molybdenum, selenium and uranium having
positive detections. A comparison of the 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 data to the 2013 data
shows that the concentrations of most detected analytes remained approximately the same with
9
only minor changes within the limits of normal analytical deviation. The reported values for
calcium, fluoride, magnesium, sodium, sulfate, molybdenum, and uranium increased from the
2012 sample results, but they are below the upper range of historic values for the on-site
monitoring wells. The differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal
fluctuations due to flow rates or seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. Overall, the data
reported for Ruin Spring are typical for a surface water sample with no indication of Mill
influence.
5.1.2 Cottonwood Seep
No VOCs or radiologies were detected. Metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only uranium having a positive detection. A
comparison of the 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 data to the 2013 data shows that the
concentrations of most detected analytes remained approximately the same with only minor
changes within the limits of normal analytical deviation. The reported values for fluoride,
uranium, and sulfate increased from the 2012 sample results, but they are below the upper range
of historic values for the on-site monitoring wells. The differences are not significant and are
most likely due to normal fluctuations due to flow rates or seasonal variations due to annual
precipitation. Overall, the data reported for Ruin Spring are typical for a surface water sample
with no indication of Mill influence.
5.1.3 Entrance Spring
No VOCs were detected. Gross alpha, metals and major ions were the only analytes detected.
The metals detections were minimal with only iron, manganese, selenium, and uranium having
positive detections, with the concentrations of iron, manganese and uranium increasing
compared to the 2012 sample results. The reported values for calcium, chloride, fluoride,
magnesium, potassium, sodium, sulfate, and TDS increased from the 2012 sample results. Gross
alpha was detected at a higher activity level than 2012, but still below the GWQS of 15 pCi/L.
The detected concentrations are significantly below the upper range of historic values for the on-
site monitoring wells. The differences are not significant and are most likely due to normal
fluctuations due to flow rates or seasonal variations due to annual precipitation. The variations
are likely caused by the drought conditions which were present at the time of the July sampling
event. Overall, the data reported for Entrance Spring are typical for a surface water sample with
no indication of Mill influence.
6.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
No corrective action reports are required for the 2013 annual sampling event.
6.1 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period
No corrective action reports were required for the 2012 annual sampling event.
10
7.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
EFRI has provided to the Director electronic copies of the laboratory results as part of the annual
seeps and springs monitoring in Comma Separated Values, from the laboratory. A copy of the
transmittal e-mail is included under Tab F.
11
8.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. on November 19,2013.
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
Frank Filas, P.E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
12
Certification
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including th~·b · ·. · · and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Frank Filas, P .E
Vice President, Permitting and Environmental Affairs
Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.
13
Tables
Table l:Bummary of Seeps and Sprjngs Sampling for 2013 -.
Work Order Date of Lab
Location Sample Date No./Lab Set ID Report
AWAL = 1307412 AWAL = 7/31113
Entrance Seep 7116/2013 GEL= 329986 GEL= 8/2113
AW AL = 1307412 A WAL = 7/31/13
Cottonwood Seep 7/16/2013 GEL= 329986 GEL= 8/2113
Back Spring (Duplicate of A W AL = 1307412 AWAL = 7/31113
Ruin Spring) 7/16/2013 GEL= 329986 GEL= 8/2113
AWAL = 1307412 AWAL = 7/31113
Ruin Spring 7116/2013 GEL= 329986 GEL= 8/2/13
Westwater Seep Not Sampled-Dry Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled-Dry
Corral Spring Not Sampled-Dry Not Sampled -Dry Not Sampled -Dry
Corral Canyon Spring Not Sampled-Dry Not Sampled-Dry Not Sampled -Dry
Table2A Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
Ruin Spring
'l II I.
Range of Average
Historic Values
2011-for Monitoring Ave 2003-
Constituent 2009 2010 May 2011-July 2012 2013 Wells 1 * 20042
Major Ions (mg/1)
Carbonate <I <1 <1 I <1 <I --..
Bicarbonate 233 254 241 239 237 208 ---
Calcium !51 136 145 148 147 149 ---
Chloride 28 23 25 44 28 26.3 NO-213 27
Fluoride 0.5 0.53 0.45 0.5 0.52 0.538 NO-1.3 0.6
Magnesium 32.3 29.7 30.6 31.1 31.9 32.1 -~-
Nitrogen-
Ammonia 0.09 <0.05 NO <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 --..
Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.56 ----
Potassium 3.3 3.07 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.46 ----
Sodium 104 93.4 110 111 115 118 --
Sulfate 528 447 486 484 464 553 NO-3455 521
TOS 1010 903 942 905 1000 952 1019 -5548 1053
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 .. -
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NO -4.78 0.01
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 ---
Cobalt <10 <10 <1 0 <10 <10 <10 ---
Copper <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Iron <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 <30 NO -7942 25
Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
Manganese <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 NO-34,550 5
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---
Molybdenum 17 17 16 17 16 16.1 --
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 NO-61 0.05
Selenium 12.2 10 11.8 10.2 10.8 10.2 NO -106.5 12.1
Si lver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -I ·-
Tin <100 <100 <100 <1 00 <100 <100 -' -it
Uranium 9.11 8.47 9.35 8.63 8.68 9.12 II NO-59.8 .l 10
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 .. -
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 .. -
Rn(]loJogic.s;(pCi/l)
Gross Alpha <0.2 <0.2 <-0.3 <-0.05 <-0.09 <1.0 NO-36 Ji 0.28
VOCS (ug/L) I
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 :-:;:. I,_
Ruin Spring
I
I Range of Average
I Historic Values
2011-for Monitoring Ave 2003-
Constituent 2009 2010 May 2011-July 2012 ~ 2013 Wells 1 * 20042
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -·-
caroon
tetrachloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 --' --
Methylene
Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -·-
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -: -·
Tetrah ydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---~
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ~ ~-
I .. From F1gure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Rev1sed Addendum, Background Groundwater Qualtty Repott. New
Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, April 30, 2008, prepared by
INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix D ofthe Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.'s White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by
2 From Figure 9 of the Revised Addendum, Evaluation of Available Pre-Operational and Regional Background Data,
Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp.'s White Mesa Mill Site, San
Juan Couinty, Utah, November 16, 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3,
MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-11, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17, MW-18, MW-1'9, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-
24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)2
Table2B Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
Cottonwood Seep
Range of I
I ~ Average I
Historic
Values for
Monitoring Ave 1977-
Constituent 2009 2010 2011-May 2011-July 2012 2013 Wells1* 1982 I
Major Ions (mg/1)
Carbonate <1 <1 <1 6 <1 <1 .c.. -
Bicarbonate 316 340 330 316 326 280 --
Calcium 90.3 92.2 95.4 94.2 101 87.9 --
Chloride 124 112 113 134 149 118 ND-213 31
Fluoride 0.4 0.38 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.417 ND-1.3 0.8
Magnesium 25 24.8 25 .2 25.2 27.7 23.6 -~
Nitrogen-Ammonia <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 --
Nitrogen-Nitrate 0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -I ·-
Potassium 5.7 5.77 6 5.9 6.2 5.53 --
Sodium 205 214 229 227 247 217 .. -
Sulfate 383 389 394 389 256 403 ND-3455 230
TDS 1010 900 1030 978 1040 996 1019-5548 811
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 I' ~ ..
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND-4.78 -
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 ... --
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ~ --
Copper <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Iron <30 <30 53 <30 <30 <30 ND -7942 150
Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Manganese <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ND-34,550 I 580
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---
Molybdenum <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61 --
Selenium <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND-106.5 --
Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ---
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -·-
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 -I ·-
Uranium 8.42 8.24 7.87 8.68 8.17 8.95 ND-59.8 -
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 --
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 -
Radiologies (pCill)
Gross Alpha <0.2 <0.2 <0.1 <-0.1 <-0.2 <1.0 ND-36 7.2
VOCS (ug!L)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ---
Table2B Detected Constituents and Comparison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitoring Wells
Cottonwood Seep
Range of II
II. Average 1: IUstoric
Values for
Monitoring Ave 1977-
Constituent 2009 2010 2011-May 2011-July 2012 2013 Wells1* 1982 I
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1 .0 <1.0 <1.0 -· -
caroon
tetrachloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ---
Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
Tetrahydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -.....
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
l From F1gure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revtsed Addendum, Background Groundwater Qualtty Report: New Wells
for Denison Mines (USA) Corp's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, April 30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines
(USA) Corp.'s White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-
3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-11, MW-12,MW-14, MW-15,MW-17,MW-18, MW-19, MW-20,MW-22, MW-23,MW-24,
MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
Table2C Detected Constituents and Compurison to Historic Values and Mill Site Monitori ng Wells
WesLwutcr Stt.P
Historic Values for
r' 2011-Monitoring Wells1
Constituent 2009 2010 2011-May July 2012 2013 *
Major Ions (mg/1)
Carbonate <I <I <1 -,::
Bicarbonate 465 450 371 -
Calcium 191 179 247 I• -
Chloride 41 40 21 NO-213
Huorfde 0.7 0.6 0.54 ND-U
Magnesium 45,9 44.7 34.7 Not Not Not Sampled -
Nitrogen-Ammonia <0.05 0.5 0.06 Sampled-Sampled--Dry ..
Nitrogen-Nitrate 0.8 <0.1 <0.1
Dry Dry
1-..
Potassium 1.19 6.57 3.9 -
Sodmm 196 f60 112 I ~ .,
Sultate 646 607 354 Nl.Y-3455
pH (s.u.) 8.01 7.38 7.2 6:7-~.9
TDS !370 1270 853 1019-5548
Metals (ugll)
Arsemc <) <5 12.3 -
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 0.91
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 0.9 ND-4.78
Chromium <25 <25 <25 -
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 -
Copper <10 <10 16 -
Iron 89 56 4540 ND-7942
Lead <1.0 <1.0 41.4 -
Manganese 37 87 268 Not Not NO-34,550
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0,5 Sampled-Sampled-Not Sampled -
Molybdenum 29 Dry Dry -Dry lu 29 <10 -
Nickel <20 <20 29 ND-61
Selenium <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 lli ND-106.5
Silver <10 <10 <10 -
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 .. ,
Tin <100 <100 <100 -
Uranium 15.1 46.6 6.64 ND-59.8
Vanadium <15 <15 34 ·-
Zinc <10 <10 28 -
~~ JoTog~cs (pCi/1)
Not -Not
0.5 Sampled-Sampled-Not Sampled
Gross Alpha < -0.1 <0.3 Dry Dry -Dry ND-36
Ta bl c e2 Detected Constituents and c omparlson to Historic Values and Mill Site Moniloring Wells
Wf:St,~atcr Se4!JJ
Historic Values for
2011-Monitoring Wells1
Coru~titocnt 2009 2010 2011-May July 2012 2013 *
VOCS (ug/L)
Acetone <20 <20 ND ..
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 ND -~
Carbon tetrachloride <I.U <1.0 ND -
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 ND ..
Chl oromethane <l.U <1.0 ND Not Not --
MEK <20 <20 ND Sampled-Sampled-Not Sampled -.•
Methylene Chlonde <1.0 <l.O ND Dry Dry -Dry -
Naphthalene <1.0 <l.U ND ·-
Tetrahydroturan <l.U <1.0 ND 7
Toluene <l.U <l.U ND -
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 ND ~
1 From Figure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Wells for Denison
Mines (USA) Corp's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, April 30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc. and Table 16 and Appendix
D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines (USA) Corp.'s White Mesa Uranium Mill
Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTER A, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-
5, MW-11 , MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-17, MW-18, MW-19, MW-20, MW-22, MW-23, MW-24, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28,
MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
Table2D Detected Constituents and.Compari on to Historic Values and Mill Site M onitoring Wells
Entrance Spring
:l
Range of Average
Historic Values for
'I Constituent 2009 2010 2011-May 2011-July 2012 2013 Monitoring Wells1 *
,r Major Ions {mg/1)
Carbonate <1 <1 <1 7 <1 <1 .-
Bicarbonate 292 332 270 299 298 292 -
Calcium 90.8 96.5 88.8 96.6 105 121 "'"
Chloride 60 63 49 64 78 139 ND-213
Fluoride 0.7 0.73 0.58 0.58 0.64 0.71 ND-1.3
Magnesium 26.6 28.9 26.4 28.4 32.7 43 --
Nitrogen-Ammonia 0.28 <0.05 <0.05 0.32 <0.05 <0.05 --
Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.4 1 1.4 0.5 2.8 2.06 --
Potassium 2.4 2.74 2.6 2.9 2 3.83 --
Sodium 61.4 62.7 62.5 68.6 77.4 127 ..
Sulfate 178 179 166 171 171 394 ND-3455
TDS 605 661 571 582 660 828 1019-5548
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 .:..::
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ·--
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ND-4.78
Chromium <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 --
Cobalt <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --
Copper <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --
Iron <30 <30 37 55 34 162 ND -7942
Lead <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Manganese 54 11 47 84 <10 259 ND-34,550
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Molybdenum <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --
Nickel <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 ND-61
Selenium 12.1 9.2 13.1 5.5 13.2 11.2 ND-106.5
Silver <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 --
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --
Tin <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 --
Uranium 15.2 17.8 18.8 15.3 21.1 38.8 ND-59.8
Vanadium <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 -
Zinc <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ,_
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha 0.9 <0.5 1.5 1.6 0.5 2.3 ND-36
VOCS (ug/L)
Acetone <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 -
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Carbon tetrachloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ··--
Chloroform <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
'I . M W II Table2D Detected Constituents and Comparison to Histone Values and Mil Site tontL<mng e s
Entrance Spring
II Range of Average
Historic Values for
Constituent I 2009 2010 2011-May 2011-July 2012 2013 I Monitoring Wells1 *
Chloromethane <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 --
MEK <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 -,
Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Tetrah ydrofuran <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 :::
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
Xylenes <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -
1 From Figure 3, Table 10 and Appendix B of the Revised Addendum, Background Groundwater Quality Report: New Wells
for Denison Mines (USA) Corp's White Mesa Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, April30, 2008, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
and Table 16 and Appendix D of the Revised Background Groundwater Quality Report: Existing Wells for Denison Mines
(USA) Corp.'s White Mesa Uranium Mill Site, San Juan County, Utah, October 2007, prepared by INTERA, Inc.
*Range of average historic values for On-Site Monitoring Wells as reported on April 30, 2008 (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-
3A,MW-4,MW-5, MW-11, MW-12,MW-14, MW-15,MW-17,MW-18,MW-19,MW-20,MW-22, MW-23,MW-24,MW-
25, MW-26, MW-27, MW-28, MW-29, MW-30, MW-31 and MW-32)
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Tab B Field Parameter Measurement Data
Tab C Survey Data and Contour Map
Tab D Analytical Laboratory Data
Tab E Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
E-2 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
E-3 Analytical Method Check
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
E-5 Trip Blank Evaluation
E-6 QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
E-8 Laboratory Matrix QC Evaluation
Tab F CSV Transmittal
Tab A
Seeps and Springs Field Data Sheets and Photographic Documentation
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: _./..,.J.u;_f """!-..~"-~ ""u=Jh-k=o...~K'_· ~,_q~-e-'lie<J.-D..:__ __________ _
I
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 1/ \ t.lt 3
Sample Collected: o Yes ~No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: g j q { I 3
Sample Collected: o Yes ~fNo
Date For Third Sampling Visit: f?/ '20 /I 3
Sample Collected: o Yes )81 No
Time: ~ i 0 2..5
Time: 0~10
Time: aK30
Sampling Personnel: 6c:,.r,..;.-,o,_l ..<Acc, ·r,.._""""'w 1-io l\,'.!c.y 1 On. A t·L:~r-£.:tA.
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: (. t .wcAy lk4ci. C. ... LO j
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: _ _,,AIQL.Io~"'-"-''-:,__--------------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (0 C) ----------------
-Conductivity 1-!MHOC/cm ------------
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) __________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
~JI~n1·enm ~.~p.DtJ,airen 1Jilw'"· a eFe £mnruil.tg~~tll((dl
ID!i;tmf. ~~e~l 1..-.Lji(:{f~_ €fill~
(descmJ>e m,
.noljS~etlio~J__ = ,,
VOCs o Yes ~No o Yes o No /.! ~ 0 0 0
THF o Yes ~No DYes o No '--.p 0 0 0
Nutrients o Yes ~No o Yes o No L, t7_ 0 0 0
Other Non o Yes ~No DYes o No ~ 0 0 0
Radiologjcs
Gross Alpha o Yes ~No o Yes o No /0 ~ 0 0
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _
Notes: Ar,.\o.)c:.A !!!A. s.·~r GL.+ If>@ . Sup l.t;,.:..;; ee.r'?.A.J.. ky Le:.S!k· s\l.: 4.t
ltl:Z,:L g fg/ls-Acr-!v.:-.J... t>.A. C'•'+c_ ?-k <>8:'!0 -~ 4tu. b.>AS t.A•"-'"'\..f f!r-~·"'-i~~ ..... t-
rpvA. A/a ,., .... ±.::r f~"'..:.Sc?.M ±-a Sc.....Apl-e <?/'2-o~ Arr-~v ...A. ""'-c :'-~<. t~~ <>€:30
>e-Gf) w«.$ tAr-f . Nut-c......bl~ \-o s~p\e. Sc:.c.f b~Lcu ... .S~ Yt-D ...... ""+c.r-+-o S.:".v\idc=.-&~~ Pk~tas)
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: ....,J3-=f=,_4,/:<c.,;.<.~o~.c.c~J.:::.<---...:~::....Sp-+'-"a.-,_,_,6~F--------------
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 7 f 1;, j 1 1 Time: _ __,0~9--> ... o...,__ _____ _
Sample Collected: !?if Yes o No
Date For Second Sampling Visit::_ _______ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Sampling Personnel: 6,-.. ~ .... \ I c-..--...... e...r 1 Dc:..,q......,.
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:~ lctuo-ty "".....el C,pol
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: _ _,lw.._,.O:o___---'l.._,.'""S=--_.(_._-. .._P'"-1'1__._ ________ _
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH 3 .
-Temperature (°C) _\:u6~ • ...,2,_,8.___ __________ _
-Conductivity ~-tMHOC/cm ---liL..:t..t::!.:o~.2.o.._ ________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured)__..l..oc•=O:,__ _______ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured)-~~~""'&.__ ___ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
m~anlef~,! !.~ample rna~ .Jruf~~re~ ~ Swfillifi!LM'et~bll!
~if~ ~-eG .
'"; I ~ i= J
VOCs ~Yes D No DYes ~No ~
THF ~Yes o No o Yes ljl No 12(
Nutrients ~Yes oNo o Yes ~No ~
Other Non ~Yes o No DYes ~No 621'
Radiologies
Gross Alpha r$Yes o No 18 Yes o No 0
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
~Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: 'A-'-k. $p ~~-;&>
:ten~taltie · l;i"d~ Wfll.er
-ump td~sc~iJ,lG ··
I' n~_ii~ctro.iiJ}:.:_
D D D
0 D 0
D 0 D
D D 0
9 D 0
Notes: !>'()...~ ~ o-.s rz.._ .... ; .A 5'ft-ke . S t;e-yv p L::... ~s c.. o\v f [,'c. e...h <'·of?
!Z v~-" S pr~--J-
~
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: L' 0 <2 ,._\ eft "'j(J &-< s e < {l
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 7/1611 3 Time: _ _.JIL..-2."""2/J~'------
Sample Collected: o Yes ~No
Date For Second Sampling Vi it: g I 1 !1 "3 Time: ()7 :SO
Sample Collected: o Yes flS!' No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: g f 2o /13 Time: 09012
Sample Collected: o Yes r5i1 No
Sampling Personnel:
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:_--ct..,.......l""'a"""u'""'l:.:..,f,._.------------
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ----'-'~--------------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH --
-Temperature (0 C) ---------------
-Conductivity !lMHOC/cm -------------
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) __________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) _______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
l.?ui:allfe elf Sanu~l~-'lt~~~ iiliJfelfed ~~l.ifin2Metlh ll\
Dmect ,hilie ~ . •'ta lli e::tlS c
=~ IRuJDp
= 1"'"-
VOCs o Yes r)f'No o Yes o No 0 0
THF o Yes f>rNo o Yes oNo 0 0
Nutrients o Yes ~·No o Yes o No 0 0
Other Non o Yes l)ilNo 0 Yes o No 0 0
Radiologies
Gross Alpha o Yes ~No o Yes 0 No 0 0
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name: ___________ _
rs/:J..o/13-Ar-r-lvc..A 0"-;.'+~ .... t-O'loo , :;~e..fi uc..> cJ.~-y.
C:o ... lA "'-cl .S.;...M..fk S~c.('-Se..c_ j~t-...o+o~.
.• Ill~ @.~~ {Heseitil)e,.ih
RQ.t~t~.t!.PJiP.nDI_l
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: ----..:K-=-'""'.L"""'~'"""'V\._,._____,_, 5-'-'~p..u.::.o-l::::S...J!. .. ~· -------------
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 7/ i 6/ 1;?. Time: _ _.,OoL--19""'3..,.0""'--------
Sample Collected)~'Yes o No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
SamplingPersonnel: 6.= .. rr\,..,_ P«>-l.""'er:.,rQ..........:.r l.( • ..,lll,1c:y-. c~ H~'"S'M
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: L 1 rsuc&.y L'A.&.J.. ?,.:rv I
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: _.ul ."-'o=--__._lL!-• .5~· __.6.._,P""":M~-----------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH 3
-Temperature (°C) ~' 6"" . .,_.. 2.""i,.___ ___________ _
-Conductivity !!MHOC/cm __.l'-i.{....,t>""2.,__ ________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured)__....:.-"'<-________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) ~:z.=~ ..... r;'-------
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
iR ~~ey. s~"(PYJt} lllaken Filte'Fe.i~J = ~s-amv:u rw~mrur ·~
= ~ liilweet ~ Pemstilllc· 'Laffit, "ithe..r.
J
~ "lliunp r ~u-eib~;· .
VOCs \i:!Yes o No o Yes Iii No
THF 1;!1 Yes o No o Yes ~No
Nutrients ®'Yes o No o Yes fig No
Other Non qfYes o No o Yes G(No
Radiologies
Gross Alpha ~Yes oNo ii!'J Yes oNo
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
fiZI Duplicate
J&l
,g
®
~·
0
Duplicate Sample Name: IJ,;.,.t:..lc S'pr ~ ""'3
' 0
0
0
0
~
Notes:AnL1e.t:~\ M g, ·k o-+-ct915 1:\nwy rc:...~"'-\.....~ ... ~
O..f=t;.IL "'"'·'""" ;-:::5 \..l....q_ L.:..S+ ~ '-l \....:.o v \J. f>"'-1""""-"'""c--+erc
notES~ttio~~'
0 0
0 0 -
0 0
0 0
0 D
In
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: £a'--"V'__._c""';:._.,'-'<-l, _ _,.~~:.,.()"'"'a4-l-!: ~'-"--lh:q-____________ _
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: j l1 I, I rJ Time:_..a.;liL.oo5!!:!5:!....-______ _
Sample Collected: 0 Yes ,J& No
Date For Second Sampling Visit: g I 'l / 13 Time:_...,O<-..U.S._..c1'""o~-----
Sample Collected: o Yes ~No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: o 8 I J.o (13 Time:_ ..... o::;......;.L&--"L:j~-=~~-·------
Sample Collected: o Yes ~No
Sampling Personnel: G.::..rr~ ..... f'.:..l....yc l·~ k+oll;ele..y \ t'>t cJ~A.. 'Cvd'--
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling:_..c;.f..__,.l"""'----'-v"'---'c"'--'A9y~-----------­
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate:
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH -
-Temperature (°C) ----------------
-Conductivity [-tMHOC/cm ---------------
-Turbidity (NTU) (if rpeasured)_-_________ _
-Redox Potential Eh (m V) (if measured) _.--______ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
~~~~ ~~Pl~~ll' !iJt!\tg_~~!i iS~Yill tjf.<N.feili<f&
l.f!lwe_~1 ~(lll~'lf r.ta_CJ!e ~ lefiY~ I'd PiiifiJl .-. ~_ffi I
-II itt"~f§.e'itioD))!I
VOCs o Yes ~No o Yes o No 0 0 0 0
THF o Yes !)a' No o Yes ONo 0 0 0 0
Nutrients o Yes cyg No o Yes o No 0 0 0 0
Other Non o Yes ~No o Yes oNo 0 0 0 0
Radiologies
Gross Alpha o Yes ~No o Yes oNo 0 0 0 0
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name:. ___________ _
Notes: Arr-~.:.~J. &"'-;;--h .. e..+ \\£1>, 1-\t.eu.>y rp...;A ~ ..... \-~c. Arc-e.. ~""'er +-'--e.. t&-Jl-~'1
lM,;,}l';,S .:.e..usc.A \-\-t. fLI$4. +a be. at~ Nw w·e .. .+c-r= wM 11rwe. .... \-= +-e O::cHMf\e.. :Se..t:.. p4t~.
P~.:..-b,r-e.. 14.:..,s t-.d:: . .e,""' e..\-HS5 .. Le-ft .si'-!·c.. o..t IWO.-. Si9lt3-Arri.,t<~ a,._ .;,'h. t>..\-~800.
s.f .. ~""-5 W4 fcvA.o\ J..ry. sl:z.oh'3-Ar-r-\vt.-c.l CA.-Sl~c.. c..+ 0.8'"l5,~fr-\...._3 v.~ .... .s c)...r-y. l
No+ a...~lt!. \-o St...-Mjk Sfrl~-Se-e... Pk-6+os
I
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location:
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 1 /1 b j 13
Sample Collected: ~ Yes o No
Time: _ ___,0""--'7""'SI~o=-------
Date For Second Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Sampling Personnel:
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: c 1 chJ (\ y o..."'"d. c., .a~l
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: ____...._....,.2 ... 5.._-----"--', w'-"'-=-_ ..... 6...._PA~--'-----------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH
-Temperature (°C) _...._1 _.9.......,.5:...:..( __ --:-::----------
-Conductivity [!MHOC/cm _..:....l .:..:l5;_. ;2..;__ ________ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured) __ lL-:.'""'5'--. ______ _
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) -~3"-'i...,c<------
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
.a'"'~ 'lif:-'I..X.. ~.>~f s~~ "' ,;.-.=,.-=;· ~ ~· ~WJ.I~ -~ ...
~~ ... ·~Cili-7 "Y:ii!;~~-. .il: IIIJIC! -... -... ~-~~ "'"'= '~?~~ m--p_. ':;h:;:;-;.,-: .> ·~ ci;,,~ -.} llQle,s());"_lilll" ll!JJ'_
VOCs l8J Yes oNo o Yes ~·No 0 ~ 0 0
THF ~Yes o No o Yes ~No ~ @ 0 0
Nutrients ~-Yes ONo o Yes ~No 0 ~ D 0
Other Non liO Yes oNo o Yes ~No ~ 0 0 0
R ::~rlinlno-ics
Gross Alpha ~Yes oNo ~Yes oNo 0 !if D 0
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name:. ___________ _
Notes: D 'Llz.lag ~:.A :> pr-;"':9 OA -z /15 f-"p;-c'! ,z.:,..., +. H e:.M y r o-ZA$ ru. 1!:""«"-eA. ~ ....... ~r.;.c._ ,_L.,.,...'"!l
t-4 \4i£•l-~L{ l... ..... w s Arriuc,.:J-e..-:rNe.-c..·t C?7 a..lc. e,,_,s-.,__.-..c..+<-r~ 1....,>c-r<" t<:\.~c::A
o-.p\.. SOvMflcS ;.,)~t"C:. .ac\I G.._.f 4 A\-~150 . 1..2<':·-+~r b .u.<:.."""e.. ....... ,_11. f c\.v•.-•;; &olc:!. ..... -f, t..~-f+-5 1·\-~ D..+ e>'B\0. Pit.·h.>.-'-' """"""'i t-.o-~C:.A. C)·~ ~c..e..f> b c..~C)T'(_ St--oM./ll .. ;o/\.1) ..
Field Data Record-Seeps and Springs Sampling
Seep or Spring Location: -'.::o,..i.!.~....L-UL.!o~N~tA.u,l(~u~v~(,__~"-<;._;¥0:::::.;P"-l.I..::..V\b~----------­r --=:J
Date For Initial Sampling Visit: 1 /16 J 13 Time: _ __.._.0'-'9~11 ..... 0,_ ____ _
Sample Collected: I)( Yes o No
Date For Second Sampling Visit:. ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Date For Third Sampling Visit: ________ Time: _________ _
Sample Collected: o Yes o No
Sampling Personnel: Vp..;r~ ~(~L.-,e.r-, Tc~..Aoe-e.• \to\\;.:'-a-y" o~c.., 1-t......,J.e.I"'..-OA
Weather Conditions at Time of Sampling: C l c wA'f I).. .A. A L no i
Estimated Seep or Spring Flow Rate: _ _.."'-'5~-::.......J.\ ...... ""o~_.6~PLM~---------
Field Parameter Measurements:
-pH ~. 'J.S
-Temperature (°C) _....ll...sb!:..f.•....I!:U:.:st.. __________ _
-Conductivity ~tMHOC/cm --~''-"'b=3'-'-l....__ _______ _
-Turbidity (NTU) (if measured).___.;l<::....!:...: .. 0=----------
-Redox Potential Eh (mV) (if measured) ___.;2.~S~9ao..-____ _
Analytical Parameters/Sample Collection Method:
-1?~~~ -~ c ·S!mfiie~mrufefiJ II' Elif~lie~ 'S'aiil'P.Im~lM'ethod ~ ~
. 11~ Jllmeg~ ~ ~i~~·$i~ j[~!d!~ Otli~:
P.imlp tif~cmo~in
II
I notes se-etio.wl = =
VOCs [it Yes oNo o Yes ~No 0 rg· 0 0
THF OOYes o No o Yes tMl No • ® 0 0
Nutrients 18fYes oNo o Yes (81 No 0 ~ 0 0
Other Non ~Yes ONo o Yes ~No 14' 0 0 0
Radiologies
Gross Alpha ~Yes oNo J8 Yes o No 0 ~-0 0
QC Samples Associated with this Location:
o Rinsate Blank
o Duplicate
Duplicate Sample Name:. ___________ _
sp.-;"":~ l 1 n Notes: i.> t.-v~\4 f e J.. ~ b-'1 1 s p 0 r-..... u ....... :t' H !U\,VY Cb-t"';S <A G,..r"o~!!.,... re..?ro ~A. e.""'
i ~ ._..,._c.= tu=e-~ ,)....,.,..·,~ ·r"-. l..,s 1-' ;21:\ b¢vrS-Aa'i ~G.J.. .t""-.s\..f..--. "-4-t'$30, p.._,..,~ ........... ~.c.:+,,.s
v'~~-~ 'r~l'-c..-.. c.. ..... A .B""-M.fllc.s vG:r-e-t-d \\~C-.t.;.A Q,.+ os>'-1 0 .. l..:.f't s 'fc tA.t OGtoo
f'l t-+vr-t-w.-..s t-c-"-"""" c ;_ S.,.,_tH~ ~ e..:rc..t.... b~~t.rL $"~f\c...r we.. r c:.-., "i\'"-+ c.A
TabB
Field Parameter Measurement Data
F. ld t 1e paTame crs
Location pH Conductivity Tur.hidity. Redox TemperAture
Date 7/16/2013 7/16/2013 7/16/2013 7/16/2013 7/16/2013
Entrance Seep 6.41 1152 1.5 316 19.51
Cottonwood Seep 7.25 1634 2 259 16.28
Back Spring
(Duplicate of Ruin
Spring) 7.36 1402 1.0 288 16.28
Ruin Spring 7.36 1402 1.0 288 16.28
TabC
Survey Data and Contour Map
Seeps and Springs Survey Locations
Mid-December 2009 Survey
Location Latitude (N) Longitude (W) Elevation
FROG POND 37°33'03.535811 109°29'04.955211 5589.56
CORRAL CANYON 37°33'07.139211 109°29'12.390711 5623.97
ENTRANCE SPRING 37°32'01.648711 109°29'33.700511 5559.71
CORRAL SPRINGS 37°29'37.919211 109°29'35.8201 II 5383.35
RUIN SPRING 37°30'06.044811 109°31'23.430011 5380.03
COTTONWOOD 37°31'21.700211 109°32'14.792311 5234.33
WESTWATER 37°31'58.502011 109°31'25.734511 5468.23
Verification Survey July 2010
RUIN SPRING 37°30'06.045611 109°31'23.4181 II 5380.01
COTTONWOOD 37°31'21.698711 1 09°32'14. 792711 5234.27
WESTWATER 37°31'58.501311 109°31'25.735711 5468.32
@ estimated dry area
MW·5 perched monitoring well showing e 5503 elevation in feet amsl
rw0
4•12 temporary perched monitoring well
5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN·7 t had 't t 't . A 5562 emporary perc n1 ra e mom onng
V well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer showing
Q 5593 elevation in feet amsl
1W4·32 temporary perched monitoring well
~5564 installed September, 2013 showing
approximate elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING o 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
(DR-SERIES PIEZOMETERS NOT INCLUDED)
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE Hfl18000/nov13/
springs_report/Uwl0913sp_nodr.srf
FIGURE
C-1
® estimated dry area
MW-5 perched monitoring well showing
e ,sso3 elevation in feet amsl
TW0
4•12 temporary perched monitoring well
5582 showing elevation in feet amsl
TWN·7 temporary perched nitrate monitoring
<>5562 well showing elevation in feet amsl
PIEZ:1 perched piezometer showing
~ o593 elevation in feet amsl
TW4-32 temporary perched monitoring well
~ 5564 installed September, 2013 showing
approximate elevation in feet amsl
RUIN SPRING b 5380 seep or spring showing
elevation in feet amsl
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC.
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2013 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE H:/718000/nov13/
springs_report/Uw10913sp.srf
FIGURE
C-2
TabD
Analytical Laboratory Data
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001
Client Sample ID: Enterance Seep
ANALVTICAL lABORATORIES Collection Date: 7/16/2013 750h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115 Arsenic mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1809h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 190811 E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Phone: [phone] Calcium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1350h E200.7 10.0 121
Toll Free: [phone] Chromium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Fax: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 7/19/2013 114511 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
~-mail: [e-mail] Copper mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Iron mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1809h E200.8 0.0300 0.162
web: www.awal-labs.com Lead mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1809h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
Magnesium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1350h E200.7 10.0 43.0
Manganese mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0100 0.259 Kyle F. Gross
Mercury mg/L 7/22/2013 1200h 7/23/2013 820h E245.1 0.000500 < 0.000500
Laboratory Director
Molybdenum mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Jose Rocha Nickel mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
QA Officer Potassium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 131911 E200.7 1.00 3.83
Selenium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 190811 E200.8 0.00500 0.0112
Silver mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/25/2013 958h E200.7 10.0 127
Thallium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/29/2013 ll58h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/28/2013 2004h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1705h E200.8 0.000300 0.0388
Vanadium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1319h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 7/19/2013 ll45h 7/22/2013 1908h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
2 -Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 6 of36
All anuly.scs applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA urc pcrtOnncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive ll.SC of the ~ddrcsscc Privileges of
subscqllCnt llSC of the name of this company or any member of its slJfl~ or reproduction oflhis report in connection with thi! advcrtiscmt:nt, promotion or sale of any p10duct or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this rcrort for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001
American West Client Sample ID: Enterance Seep
..., "-l'flle Al l AnonAfl)nH ~ Collection Date: 7116/2013 750h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual 463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 7/29/2013 1130h 7/29/2013 2113h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 7/19/2013 l139h SM2320B 1.00 292
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 7/19/2013 l139h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 7/22/2013 1844h E300.0 100 139
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 7/24/2013 223h E300.0 0.100 0.710
Fax: [phone] Ion Balance % Calc. -15.0 -8.34 7/26/2013 856h
~-mail: [e-mail]
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) mg/L 7/23/2013 1755h E353.2 1.00 2.06
web: www.awal-labs.com Sulfate mg/L 7/22/2013 1844h E300.0 100 394
Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 18.0
Total Cations, meq/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 15.2
Kyle F. Gross Measured
Laboratory Director Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 7/19/2013 1210h SM2540C 20.0 828
Total Dissolved Solids 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 0.823
Jose Rocha Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
QA Officer Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 1,010
Calculated
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix inteiference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 7/3112013 Page I 0 of 36
All analyses applicable to the C\VA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfom1ed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attarhcd COC This report is provided for the exclusive llSC of the addressee Privileges of
suhscqucnlusc oft he nome of this company or any member of its staff, 01 reproduction of this rcpo1t in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in conncdion \\ ith the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANA LYTICAl LAB O RATOAifS
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412-001A
Client Sample ID: Enterance Seep
Collection Date: 7/16/2013 750h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 7/22/2013 950h
Units: 11g/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
17060-07-0 59.5 50.00 119
460-00-4 50.7 50.00 101
1868-53-7 54.5 50.00 109
2037-26-5 50.0 50.00 100
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 14 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc oft he name of this company or any member of its stnft: or reproduction of this rcpmt in connection with the advertisement, promotion m sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report f01 any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: August 14, 2013
Company:
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID :
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Enterance Seep
329986001
Ground Water
16-JUL-13 07:50
22-JUL-13
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
]FPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha 2.30 +/-0.299
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
)urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
MDC
0.365
Jarium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
'lotes:
:ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
RL
1.00
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlOO
DNMIOOl
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 08/10/13 1859 1318324
Analyst Comments
Result Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
97.4 (25%-125%)
~RL = Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
:he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-002
American West Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
ANALYTICAL lARORATORifS Collection Date: 7116/2013 840h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 Arsenic mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1814h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Phone:[phone] Calcium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1402h E200.7 10.0 87.9
Toll Free: [phone] Chromium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687 Cobalt mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
~-mail: [e-mail] Copper mg/L 7/19/2013 114511 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Iron mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1814h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
web: www.awal-labs.com Lead mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1814h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
Magnesium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1402h E200.7 10.0 23.6
Manganese mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Kyle F. Gross
Mercury mg/L 7/22/2013 1200h 7/23/2013 827h E245.1 0.000500 < 0.000500
Laboratory Director
Molybdenum mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Jose Rocha Nickel mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
QA Officer Potassium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1302h E200.7 1.00 5.53
Selenium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Silver mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/25/2013 1009h E200.7 10.0 217
Thallium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/29/2013 1219h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/28/2013 2018h E200.8 0.100 <0.100
Uranium mg/L 7119/2013 114511 7/26/2013 1710h E200.8 0.000300 0.00895
Vanadium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1302h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1924h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 7 of 36
All mmlyscs applicablt! to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA arc pcrfom1cd in accordance to NELAC protocolsr Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC.. This report is provided for the exclusive liSt! ofth...: addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of rhc name of this company or any member of its staft: 01 reproduction of this report in connection with the ;•dvcrtisl.!mcnt. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report fo1 any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-002
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
ANALYTICAl LABORATORIES Collection Date: 7/16/2013 840h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 7/29/2013 I \30h 7/29/2013 2115h £350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 7/19/2013 1139h SM2320B 1.00 280
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 71\9/20\3 1139h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 7/22/2013 2000h £300.0 100 118
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 7/24/2013 250h £300.0 0.100 0.417
Fax: [phone] Ion Balance % 7/26/2013 856h Calc. -15.0 -4.25
~-mail: [e-mail]
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.100 < 0.100 mg/L 7/23/2013 180811 £353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com Sulfate mg/L 7/22/2013 200011 £300.0 100 403
Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/26/2013 85611 Calc. 17.3
Total Cations, meq/L 7/26/2013 85611 Calc. 15.9
Kyle F. Gross Measured
Laboratory Director Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 7119/2013 1210h SM2540C 20.0 996
Total Dissolved Solids 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 0.975
Jose Rocha Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
QA Officer Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 1,020
Calculated
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page II of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA a1c perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infom1ation is located on the attached COC. This report is p10vidcd for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction of this 1 cp01i in connection with the advertisement, promo lion or sale of any product or process, or in connection"' ith the re-publication of this report fm any
American West
ANALYTICAl lABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412-002A
Client Sample ID: Cottonwood Spring
Collection Date: 7116/2013 840h
Received Date: 7119/2013 1010h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 7/19/2013 2127h
Units: f!g/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surrogate
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Dilution Factor: Method:
CAS Reporting
Number Limit
78-93-3 20.0
67-64-1 20.0
71-43-2 1.00
56-23-5 1.00
67-66-3 1.00
74-87-3 1.00
75-09-2 1.00
91-20-3 1.00
109-99-9 1.00
108-88-3 1.00
1330-20-7 1.00
CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC
17060-07-0 58.8 50.00 118
460-00-4 51.1 50.00 102
1868-53-7 54.5 50.00 109
2037-26-5 50.0 50.00 100
SW8260C
Analytical
Result Qual
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Limits Qual
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 15 of 36
All ann lyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and RCRA arc perfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols.. Pertinent sampling information is located on tl1c attached COC. This report is p10vidcd for the exclusive use of the add1essce Privileges of
suhscqllcnt usc oftl1c name of this company or any member of it" staft~ 01 reproduction of this rcpm1 in connection with the advertisement, p1omotion or sale of any product or process, or in t:onnection with the re-publication of this report f01 any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: August 14, 2013
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Cottonwood Spring
329986002
Ground Water
16-ruL-13 08:40
22-ruL-13
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
::JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
]ross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.132
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
MDC
0.310
-------\1ethod Descri}2tion
EPA 900.1 Modified
)urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
~arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
'lotes:
=::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 08/11/13 1029 1318324
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
97.0 (25 %-125%)
SRL =Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
:he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 20 13
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-003
American West Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
ANALYTI CA L LAOORATORifS Collection Date: 7/16/2013 930h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
463 West 3600 South
;a!t Lake City, UT 84115 Arsenic mg/L 7119/2013 1 145h 7122/2013 1929h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 181911 E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1929h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Phone:[phone] Calcium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1406h E200.7 10.0 149
Toll Free: [phone] Chromium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1929h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Fax: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1929h E200.8 0.0100 <0.0100
~-mail: [e-mail] Copper mg/L 7/19/2013 114511 7/22/2013 1929h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Iron mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1819h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
web: www.awal-labs.com Lead mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1819h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
Magnesium mg/L 7119/2013 I 14511 7/23/2013 1406h E200.7 10.0 32.1
Manganese mg/L 7119/2013 I 145h 7/22/2013 1929h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Kyle F. Gross
Mercury 0.000500 < 0.000500 mg/L 7/22/2013 1200h 7/23/2013 828h E245.1
Laboratory Director
Molybdenum 0.0100 0.0161 mg/L 7/19/2013 \145h 7/22/2013 1929h E200.8
Jose Rocha Nickel mg/L 7/19/2013 I 145h 7/22/2013 192911 E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
QA Officer Potassium mg/L 7119/2013 I 145h 7/23/2013 1306h E200.7 1.00 3.46
Selenium mg/L 7/19/2013 \145h 7/22/2013 192911 E200.8 0.00500 0.0102
Silver mg/L 7/19/2013 \145h 7/22/2013 192911 E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 7/19/2013 I 145h 7/25/2013 1013h E200.7 10.0 118
Thallium mg/L 7/19/2013 114511 7/29/2013 1247h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 7119/2013 114511 7/28/2013 2021h E200.8 0.100 <0.100
Uranium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1716h E200.8 0.000300 0.00912
Vanadium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 130611 E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 7/19/2013 114511 7/22/2013 1929h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Report Date: 7/3 I 120 I 3 Page 8 of 3 6
All analy~cs applicable tu the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA urc pcrtOm1cd in a..:cordancc to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling. infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provit.lcd for the cxch1sivc u~c ofth~ odd1csscc Privileges of
subscqliCnl ~lSC of the rwmc of this ~.:ompany or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the :.u..lvertiscmcnt. promotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, or in ~.:onnedion with the re-publication of this report for any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-003
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
ANALYTICAl I ABORATORIES Collection Date: 7/16/2013 930h
Received Date: 7119/2013 1010h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 7/29/20 J 3 J 130h 7/29/2013 2110h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg/L 7/19/2013 1139h SM2320B 1.00 208
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg/L 7/19/2013 1139h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg/L 7/23/2013 1718h E300.0 5.00 26.3
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg/L 7/24/2013 317h E300.0 0.100 0.538
Fax: [phone] Ion Balance % 7/26/2013 856h Calc. -15.0 -3.60
~-mail: [e-mail] Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.100 1.56 mg/L 7/23/2013 180911 E353.2
web : www.awal-labs.com Sulfate mg/L 7/22/2013 2025h E300.0 100 553
Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 16.4
Total Cations, meq/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 15.3
Kyle F. Gross Measured
Laboratory Director Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 7/19/2013 1210h SM2540C 20.0 952
Total Dissolved Solids 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 0.944
Jose Rocha Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
QA Officer Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 1,010
Calculated
Report Date: 7/31120 13 Page 12 of36
All una lyses applicable to the CWA, SOWA, and RCRA ate pcrfonncd in accordancl! to NELAC protocols~ rertincnl samplin~ infonnation is located on the anat:hcd COC This report is p1ovidcd for the cxclu:-;ivc usc oft he addressee Pri\'ilcgcs of
subsequent t1SC oft he name of this company or any member of its start: or reproduction oftl1is rcpm1 in c.:onncction with the atlvcrtis.:ml!nt. promo lion OJ sale of any protlut:t or prol:css, OJ in connection with tbc re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANALYTICA L lABOAATORifS
463 West 3600 South
)alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412-003A
Client Sample ID: Ruin Spring
Collection Date: 7116/2013 930h
Received Date: 7119/2013 1010h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/19/2013 2146h
Units: 11g/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Garrin Palmer
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
67-64-1 20.0 < 20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate
Surr: I ,2-Dich1oroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: To1uene-d8
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Result
57.7
50.9
53.0
48.4
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 115 72-151
50.00 102 80-128
50.00 106 80-124
50.00 96.7 77-129
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 16 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, ;md RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attnchcd COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee.. Privileges of
subsequent use oft he name of this L'Ompany or any member of its slaff. or reproduction oflhis repmt in connection with the advertisement, p1omotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this terort f01 any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone]-www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: August 14, 2013
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Ruin Spring
329986003
Ground Water
16-JUL-13 09:30
22-JUL-13
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
~ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
::JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.125
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
;urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test ~-----------------------
MDC
0.325
Jarium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
'IJotes:
:::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMI00100
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFI 08/11/13 1029 1318324
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
98.9 (25%-125%)
)RL =Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
:he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-004
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
ANAlYTICAl LABORATORifS Collection Date: 7/16/2013 930h
Received Date: 7119/2013 1010h
Analytical Results DISSOLVED METALS
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115 Arsenic mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.00500 < 0.00500
Beryllium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1825h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Cadmium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Phone: [phone] Calcium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1412h E200.7 10.0 152
Toll Free: [phone] Chromium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.0250 < 0.0250
Fax: [phone] Cobalt mg/L 7/19/2013 114511 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
~-mail : [e-mail] Copper mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Iron mg!L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1825h E200.8 0.0300 < 0.0300
web: www.awal-labs.com Lead mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1825h E200.8 0.00100 < 0.00100
Magnesium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1412h E200.7 10.0 32.6
Manganese mg!L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Kyle F. Gross Mercury 0.000500 < 0.000500 mg!L 7/22/2013 1200h 7/23/2013 830h E245.1
Laboratory Director
Molybdenum 0.0100 0.0160 mg!L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 193411 E200.8
Jose Rocha Nickel mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.0200 < 0.0200
QA Officer Potassium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 131011 E200.7 1.00 3.17
Selenium mg/L 7/19/2013 11451! 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.00500 0.0108
Silver mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
Sodium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/25/2013 1017h E200.7 10.0 118
Thallium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/29/2013 1254h E200.8 0.000500 < 0.000500
Tin mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/28/2013 2023h E200.8 0.100 < 0.100
Uranium mg/L 7/19/2013 1145h 7/26/2013 1721h E200.8 0.000300 0.00916
Vanadium mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/23/2013 1310h E200.7 0.0150 < 0.0150
Zinc mg/L 7119/2013 1145h 7/22/2013 1934h E200.8 0.0100 < 0.0100
ReportDate: 7/31/2013 Page9of36
All analyses applicable! to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA urc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive liSe of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc oft he numc of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the <Jdvcrtisl!ml!nt. p10molion or sale of any product or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this rep<u1 fo1 any
INORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-004
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES Collection Date: 7/16/2013 930h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Analytical Results
Date Date Method Reporting Analytical
Compound Units Prepared Analyzed Used Limit Result Qual
463 West 3600 South
~a1t Lake City, UT 84115 Ammonia (as N) mg/L 7/29/2013 1130h 7/29/2013 2116h E350.1 0.0500 < 0.0500
Bicarbonate (as mg!L 7/19/2013 1139h SM2320B 1.00 202
CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03) mg!L 7/]9/2013 1139h SM2320B 1.00 < 1.00
Phone: [phone] Chloride mg!L 7/23/2013 1840h E300.0 5.00 26.0
Toll Free: [phone] Fluoride mg!L 7/24/2013 344h E300.0 0.100 0.540
Fax: [phone] Ion Balance % 7/26/2013 856h Calc. -15.0 -2.72
~-mail: [e-mail]
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 0.100 1.54 mg!L 7/23/2013 1810h E353.2
web: www.awal-labs.com Sulfate mg!L 7/22/2013 2050h E300.0 100 555
Total Anions, Measured meq/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 16.4
Total Cations, meq/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 15.5
Kyle F. Gross Measured
Laboratory Director Total Dissolved Solids mg!L 7/]9/2013 1210h SM2540C 20.0 984
Total Dissolved Solids 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 0.974
Jose Rocha Ratio,
Measured/Calculated
QA Officer Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L 7/26/2013 856h Calc. 1,010
Calculated
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 13 of 36
All analyses applicable to rhc CWA, SDWA, and RCRA nrc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC~ This report is provided for the exch1sivc use of the addJessec Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction of this report in connection with the :.u.lvcrtiscmcnt. promotion 01 sale of any product or process, or in c.:onncction with the re-publication of this report for any
463 West 3600 South
:lalt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone:[phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412-004A
Client Sample ID: Back Spring
Collection Date: 7/16/2013 930h
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Analyzed: 7/19/2013 2205h
Units: 11g/L Dilution Factor: Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Compound Number Limit Result Qual
2-Butanone 78-93-3 20.0 <20.0
Acetone 67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
Benzene 71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
Chloroform 67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
Chloromethane 74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
Methylene chloride 75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
Toluene 108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate CAS Result Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 17060-07-0 57.6 50.00 115 72-151
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 51.6 50.00 103 80-128
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1868-53-7 53.0 50.00 106 80-124
Surr: Toluene-d8 2037-26-5 49.1 50.00 98.3 77-129
Report Date: 7/31 /20 13 Page 17 of 36
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA urc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is rrovidcd for the exclusive usc of the addressee~ Pri\'ilcgcs of
subsequent usc of the nt1mc of this company or any member of its st<tff, OJ' rcprodur.:tion of this rcp011 in connection with the advertisement, promotion or snlc of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Report Date: August 14, 2013
Company :
Address:
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Parameter
Contact:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Ms. Kathy Weinel
White Mesa Mill GW
Back Spring
329986004
Ground Water
16-JUL-13 09:30
22-JUL-13
Client
Qualifier Result Uncertainty
tad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
:JFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
}ross Radium Alpha U 1.00 +/-0.159
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
\1ethod Description
EPA 900.1 Modified
)urrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
MDC
0.290
3arium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
'lotes:
::::ounting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
RL
1.00
Result
Project:
Client ID:
DNMIOOlOO
DNMI001
Units DF Analyst Date Time Batch Method
pCi/L KDFl 08/11113 1029 1318324
Analyst Comments
Nominal Recovery% Acceptable Limits
96.3 (25%-125%)
SRL =Sample Reporting Limit. For metals analysis only. When the sample is U qualified and ND, the SRL column reports the value which is
:he greater of either the adjusted MDL or the CRDL.
463 West 3600 South
~alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412-005A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 7/16/2013
Received Date: 7/19/2013 1010h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/22/2013 931h
Units: 1-1g/L
Compound
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Dilution Factor:
Contact: Garrin Palmer
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
Method: SW8260C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
78-93-3 20.0 < 20.0
67-64-1 20.0 <20.0
71-43-2 1.00 < 1.00
56-23-5 1.00 < 1.00
67-66-3 1.00 < 1.00
74-87-3 1.00 < 1.00
75-09-2 1.00 < 1.00
91-20-3 1.00 < 1.00
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
108-88-3 1.00 < 1.00
Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 1.00 < 1.00
Surrogate
Surr: I ,2-Dich1oroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
CAS
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Result
58.5
52.0
53.6
49.3
Amount Spiked %REC Limits Qual
50.00 117 72-151
50.00 104 80-128
50.00 107 80-124
50.00 98.5 77-129
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 18 of36
All anulyscs applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc perfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive LlSC of the addressee Pri' ilcgcs of
subsequent usc oflhe nume of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion m sale of any product or process, 01 in conneclion with the re-publication of this report for any
American West
ANAl YTI CA l LABOAATORI[S
463 West 3600 South
~a1t Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Garrin Palmer
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
6425 S. Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
TEL: [phone]
RE: Seeps and Springs 2013
Dear Garrin Palmer: Lab Set ID: 1307412
American West Analytical Laboratories received 5 sample(s) on 7/19/2013 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL) is accredited by The National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) in Utah and Texas; and is
state accredited in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Missouri.
All analyses were performed in accordance to the NELAP protocols unless noted
otherwise. Accreditation scope documents are available upon request. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be
reported by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be
confused with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant
figures for quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Digitally signed by Jose G.
G Rocha
DN: cn=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories, ou=Quatity
Jose
Rocha Assurance Officer,
emait=[e-mail],
c=US
Date: 2013,07.31 16:30:25
-06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page I of36
All anulyscs upplicablc to the CWA. SDWA, unJ RCRA urc pcrlbm1ccl in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the uttachcd COC. This report is p10vidcd for the exclusive liSC of Lhc addressee .. Privileges of
suhscljucnl usc of the name of this company or any member of its stutl or reproduction of Lhis rcp011 in connection with the atlvcrliscment. promotion or sale of any product or proecss, or in connection \\ ith the re-publication of this 1 cport for any
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ANALYTI CA L LABORATORIES Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Lab SetiD: 1307412
Date Received: 7/19/2013 1010h
Lab Sample lD Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1307412-001A Enterance Seep 7116/2013 750h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method ~alt Lake City, UT 84115 8260C/5030C
1307412-00lB Enterance Seep 7/16/2013 750h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, A2320B
1307412-00lB Enterance Seep 7/16/2013 750h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686 1307412-001 c Enterance Seep 7/16/2013 750h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
Toll Free: [phone] 1307412-00ID Enterance Seep 7116/2013 750h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
Fax: [phone] 1307412-00ID Enterance Seep 7116/2013 750h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
~-mail: [e-mail] 1307412-001E Enterance Seep 7/16/2013 750h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1307412-001 E Enterance Seep 7116/2013 750h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
web: www.awai-Jabs.com Dissolved
1307412-00 IE Enterance Seep 7116/2013 750h Aqueous Ion Balance
1307412-00lE Enterance Seep 7/16/2013 750h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
Kyle F. Gross 1307412-002A Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Laboratory Director 1307412-002B Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, A2320B
Jose Rocha 1307 412-002B Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
QA Officer 1307 412-002C Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
1307412-002D Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1307412-002D Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1307412-002E Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous Ion Balance
1307412-002E Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 840h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
1307412-002E Cottonwood Spring 7116/2013 840h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
1307412-002E Cottonwood Spring 7116/2013 840h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
1307412-003A Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1307412-003B Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
1307412-003B Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, A2320B
1307412-003C Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
l307412-003D Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
1307412-003D Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
1307412-003E Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
1307412-003E Ruin Spring 7116/2013 930h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
1307412-003E Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Ion Balance
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 2 of36
All \HHllyscs applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA urc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the ottachcd COC'. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee. Privileges of
subscq~1cnlusc of the n:amc of this company or :my mcmhcr t1fits stafl: or reproduction of this rcp01t in connection with the u(.]vcrtiscmcnt. p1omotion or sale of any produc.:t or process, or in connection\\ ith the re-publication of this repon f01 any
463 West 3600 South
;;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412
Date Received: 7119/2013 1010h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
1307412-003E Ruin Spring
1307412-004A Back Spring
1307412-004B Back Spring
1307412-004B Back Spring
1307412-004C Back Spring
1307412-004D Back Spring
1307412-004D Back Spring
1307412-004E Back Spring
1307412-004E Back Spring
1307412-004E Back Spring
1307412-004E Back Spring
1307412-00SA Trip Blank
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Date Collected Matrix Analysis
7116/2013 930h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
7/16/2013 930h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Anions, E300.0
7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Alkalinity/ Bicarbonate/
Carbonate, A2320B
7116/2013 930h Aqueous Total Dissolved Solids, A2540C
7116/2013 930h Aqueous Nitrite/Nitrate (as N), E353.2
7/16/2013 930h Aqueous Ammonia, Aqueous
7/16/2013 930h Aqueous ICPMS Metals, Dissolved
7116/2013 930h Aqueous ICP Metals, Dissolved
7116/2013 930h Aqueous Mercury, Drinking Water
Dissolved
7116/2013 930h Aqueous Ion Balance
7/16/2013 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 3 of36
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, und RCRA urc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staft: 01 reproduction of this 1cpo1t in connection with the nc.Jvcrtiscmcnt, p101110tion or sale of any producl or process, 01 inl'onncction with the re-publication of this rcpon for any
ANA LYTIC A l LABOAATORI[S
463 West 3600 South
;alt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Inorganic Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412
7/19/2013
7/16/2013
Intact
None
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: The analysis and preparation of all
samples were performed within the method holding times. All samples were properly
preserved.
Preparation and Analysis Requirements: The samples were analyzed following the
methods stated on the analytical reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, DUP:
Method Blanks (MB): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, with the
following exceptions:
SamJ:lle ID Analyte QC Explanation
1307412-00 lE Calcium MS High analyte concentration
1307412-00lE Sodium MS High analyte concentration
1307411-003A Nitrite/Nitrate (as N) MS/MSD Sample matrix interference
1307412-00lA Nitrite/Nitrate (as N) MS/MSD Sample matrix interference
Duplicates (DUP): The parameters that require a duplicate analysis had RPDs
within the control limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page4 of36
All ann lyses upplicabk to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA me pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is Jocatctl on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use ofth..: nddresscc Privileges of
subscq~1cnt usc of the n~mc of this company or any member of its stafl: or reprodw.:tion of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in l:onncction "'ith the rc-puhli~.;ation of this report fm any
463 West 3600 South
;aJt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
~-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Garrin Palmer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-0-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
Seeps and Springs 2013
1307412
7/19/2013
7/16/2013
Intact
None
SW-846 8260C/5030C
Volatile Organic Compounds
General Set Comments: No target analytes were observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7/31/20 13 Page 5 of 3 6
All amdyscs applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcr~Om1cd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for Lhe exclusive usc or the addressee Pri\'ilcgcs of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staft: or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any producl <lr process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for ~my
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013 -
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-26726 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Calcium 9.80
Magnesium 9.66
Potassium 9.73
Vanadium 0.194
Lab Sample ID: LCS-26726 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Sodium 9.72
Lab Sample ID: LCS-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic 0.201
Beryllium 0.190
Cadmium 0.201
Chromium 0.198
Cobalt 0.197
Copper 0.199
Iron 0.995
Lead 0.198
Manganese 0.199
Molybdenum 0.200
Nickel 0.195
Selenium 0.197
Silver 0.202
Uranium 0.194
Zinc 0.981
Lab Sample ID: LCS-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Tin 0.977
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: ME
QCType: LCS
------
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
07/23/2013 1254h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.7 0.0227 1.00 10.00 0 98.0
mg/L E200.7 0.102 1.00 10.00 0 96.6
mg!L E200.7 0.203 1.00 10.00 0 97.3
mg!L E200.7 0.00150 0.00500 0.2000 0 97.2
07/25/2013 954h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.7 0.0514 1.00 10.00 0 97.2
07/22/2013 1903h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.8 0.00118 0.00200 0.2000 0 101
mg/L E200.8 0.0000698 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.2
mg!L E200.8 0.0000726 0.000500 0.2000 0 100
mg!L E200.8 0.000938 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.2
mg/L E200.8 0.00364 0.00400 0.2000 0 98.4
mg/L E200.8 0.00152 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.4
mg/L E200.8 0.0472 0.100 1.000 0 99.5
mg/L E200.8 0.00126 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.1
mg!L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.4
mg!L E200.8 0.000496 0.00200 0.2000 0 100
mg/L E200.8 0.000898 0.00200 0.2000 0 97.4
mg/L E200.8 0.000686 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.3
mg/L E200.8 0.000101 0.00200 0.2000 0 101
mg/L E200.8 0.0000598 0.00200 0.2000 0 96.8
mg/L E200.8 0.00368 0.00500 1.000 0 98.1
07/28/20 13 200 I h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.8 0.000620 0.00200 1.000 0 97.7
Limits
85 -115
85 -115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 19 of36
l analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in acco1dancc to NELAC p1otocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the auachcd COC_ Thi!' report is provided for the cxdusivc usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mb.:r of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wirh the re-publication of this report for any purpose other rhan for the addressee will be gnmtctl only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: LCS-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Thallium 0.179
Lab Sample ID: LCS-26771 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: Hg-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury 0.00354
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
07/29/2013 1124h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.8
07/23/2013 817h
07/22/2013 1200h
mg/L E245.1
MDL
0.000222
0.0000175
Reporting
Limit
0.00200
0.000150
Dept: ME
QCType: LCS
Amount
Spiked
0.2000
0.003330
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
%REC
89.3
106
Limits
85-115
85-115
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 20 of 36
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the add Jessee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contacl This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-26726 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Pn:par<:d:
Calcium < 1.00
Magnesium < 1.00
Potassium < 1.00
Vanadium < 0.00500
Lab Sample ID: MB-26726 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Sodium < 1.00
Lab Sample ID: MB-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic < 0.00500
Cadmium < 0.000500
Chromium < 0.0250
Cobalt < 0.0100
Copper < 0.0100
Manganese < 0.0100
Molybdenum < 0.0100
Nickel < 0.0200
Selenium < 0.00500
Silver < 0.0100
Zinc < 0.0100
Lab Sample ID: MB-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Uranium < 0.000300
Lab Sample ID: MB-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Beryllium < 0.000500
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
07/23/2013 1250h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.7
mg/L E200.7
mg/L E200.7
mg/L E200.7
07/25/2013 949h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.7
07/22/2013 1857h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
mg/L E200.8
07/26/2013 1633h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.8 -07/26/2013 1742h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.8
MDL
0.0227
0.102
0.203
0.00150
0.0514
0.00118
0.0000726
0.000938
0.00364
0.00152
0.00166
0.000496
0.000898
0.000686
0.000101
0.00368
0.00000598
0.0000174
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00500
1.00
0.00500
0.000500
0.0250
0.0100
0.0100
0.0100
0.0100
0.0200
0.00500
0.0100
0.0100
0.000300
0.000500
Dept: ME
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/3 1/20 13 Page 21 of 36
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncU in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its sta.ff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcrtiSL-'lncnt, promotion or sale of any product or process, 01 in connection with the rc-publi~.:ation oflhis report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: MB-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Iron < 0.0300
Lead < 0.00100
Lab Sample ID: MB-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DJS Date Prepared:
Tin < 0.100
Lab Sample ID: MB-26727 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Thallium < 0.000500
Lab Sample ID: MB-26771 Date Analyzed:
Test Code: Hg-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared:
Mercury < 0.000150
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
07/26/2013 1742h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L
mg!L
E200.8
E200.8
07/28/2013 1958h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg/L E200.8
07/29/20 13 I 117h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg!L E200.8
07/23/2013 815h
07/22/2013 1200h
mg!L E245.1
MDL
0.0118
0.000316
0.000620
0.0000555
0.0000175
Reporting
Limit
0.0300
0.00100
0.100
0.000500
0.000150
Dept: ME
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 22 of36
! analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addlcsscc. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this reporl in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oducl or process, 01 in connection with the rc-publicalion of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IEMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Potassium 13.6
Vanadium 0.202
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IEMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Calcium 128
Magnesium 51.6
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IEMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.7-DIS Date Prepared:
Sodium 143
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IEMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared:
Arsenic 0.208
Beryllium 0.191
Cadmium 0.196
Chromium 0.197
Cobalt 0.197
Copper 0.200
Iron 1.16
Lead 0.191
Manganese 0.454
Molybdenum 0.201
Nickel 0.195
Selenium 0.208
Silver 0.197
Uranium 0.220
Zinc 0.984
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: (8 88) 263-8686, Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: ME
QC Type: MS
--
Reporting Amount Spike Ref.
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC
07/23/20 13 125 8h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg!L E200.7 0.203 1.00 10.00 3.83 97.9
mg/L E200.7 0.00150 0.00500 0.2000 0.00466 98.7
07/23/2013 1354h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg!L E200.7 0.227 10.0 10.00 121 69.5
mg!L E200.7 1.02 10.0 10.00 43 85 .9
07/25/2013 IOOlh
07/19/2013 1145h
mg!L E200.7 0.514 10.0 10.00 127 153
07/22/2013 1913h
07/19/2013 1145h
mg!L E200.8 0.00118 0.00200 0.2000 0.00251 103
mg/L E200.8 0.0000698 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.7
mg/L E200.8 0.0000726 0.000500 0.2000 0 98.2
mg/L E200.8 0.000938 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.7
mg!L E200.8 0.00364 0.00400 0.2000 0 98.4
mg!L E200.8 0.00152 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.8
mg!L E200.8 0.0472 0.100 1.000 0.172 99.2
mg/L E200.8 0.00126 0.00200 0.2000 0 95.7
mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0.259 97.4
mg!L E200.8 0.000496 0.00200 0.2000 0.00645 97.4
mg!L E200.8 0.000898 0.00200 0.2000 0.00114 97.1
mg!L E200.8 0.000686 0.00200 0.2000 0.0112 98.6
mg/L E200.8 0.000101 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.3
mg!L E200.8 0.0000598 0.00200 0.2000 0.0356 92.4
mg!L E200.8 0.00368 0.00500 1.000 0 98.4
Limits
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75 -125
75-125
75-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD Ref. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31 /2013 Page 23 of36
1 analyses applicable to the CW A. SDW A) and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
rnbcr of its staff, or rcprodul:tion of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1 oduct or process, or in conncx:tion with the rc-publ ication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1307412 Dept: ME
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013 QCType: MS
--
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-001AMS Date Analyzed: 07/26/20 13 1644h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Beryllium 0.198 mg/L E200.8 0.0000698 0.00200 0.2000 0 99.0 75-125
Iron 0.998 mg/L E200.8 0.0472 0.100 1.000 0 99.8 75-125
Lead 0.188 mg/L E200.8 0.00126 0.00200 0.2000 0 94.2 75 -125
Manganese 0.224 mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0.0336 95.4 75 -125
Selenium 0.227 mg/L E200.8 0.000686 0.00200 0.2000 0.0205 103 75-125
Uranium 0.211 mg/L E200.8 0.0000598 0.00200 0.2000 0.0196 95.9 75-125
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001EMS Date Analyzed: 07/28/20 13 20 12h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Tin 0.967 mg/L E200.8 0.000620 0.00200 1.000 0 96.7 75-125
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-001AMS Date Analyzed: 07/29/2013 1138h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Thallium 0.185 mg/L E200.8 0.000222 0.00200 0.2000 0.000398 92.5 75-125
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001EMS Date Analyzed: 07/29/2013 1205h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Thallium 0.191 mg/L E200.8 0.000222 0.00200 0.2000 0.000061 95.4 75-125
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IEMS Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 823h
Test Code: Hg-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared: 07/22/20 13 1200h -- -
Mc:roury 0.00349 mg/L E245.1 0.0000175 0.000150 0.003330 0 105 85-liS ----
2 -Analyte concentration is too high for accurate matrix spike recovery and/or RPD.
ReportDate: 7/31/2013 Page24of36
· analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in acco1dancc to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mb.::1 of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no rcsponsib;Jity
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
ME Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001EMSD
Test Code:
Potassium
Vanadium
200.7-DIS
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001EMSD
Test Code:
Calcium
Magnesium
200.7-DIS
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001EMSD
Test Code: 200. 7-DIS
Sodium
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00lEMSD
Test Code:
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Uranium
Zinc
200.8-DIS
Result Units Method
Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 1323h
Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
13.0
0.198
mg!L
mg/L
E200.7
E200.7
Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 1358h
Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
131
52.5
mg!L
mg/L
E200.7
E200.7
Date Analyzed: 07/25/20 13 I 005h
Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
139 mg/L E200.7
Date Analyzed: 07/22/20 13 1918h
Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
0.205
0.192
0.198
0.195
0.193
0.204
1.15
0.190
0.449
0.205
0.191
0.207
0.197
0.220
0.963
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg!L
mg!L
mg!L
mg/L
mg!L
mg!L
mg!L
mg!L
mg!L
mg/L
mg!L
mg!L
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
E200.8
MDL
0.203
0.00150
0.227
1.02
0.514
0.00118
0.0000698
0.0000726
0.000938
0.00364
0.00152
0.0472
0.00126
0.00166
0.000496
0.000898
0.000686
0.000101
0.0000598
0.00368
Reporting
Limit
1.00
0.00500
10.0
10.0
10.0
0.00200
0.00200
0.000500
0.00200
0.00400
0.00200
0.100
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00200
0.00500
Dept:
QCType:
Amount
Spiked
10.00
0.2000
10.00
10.00
10.00
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
1.000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
0.2000
1.000
MSD
Spike Ref.
Amount
3.83
0.00466
121
43
127
0.00251
0
0
0
0
0
0.172
0
0.259
0.00645
0.00114
0.0112
0
0.0356
0
-JoREC
92.0
96.8
97.8
94.8
116
101
95.9
99.1
97.7
96.4
102
98.2
95.1
95.3
99.5
95.1
97.7
98.4
92.0
96.3
Limits
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75 -I 25
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
75-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
13.6
0.202
128
51.6
143
0.208
0.191
0.196
0.197
0.197
0.2
1.16
0.191
0.454
0.201
0.195
0.208
0.197
0.22
0.984
4.44
1.93
2.18
1.71
2.66
1.38
0.247
0.918
0.974
2.04
2.06
0.842
0.592
0.918
2.09
2.1 I
0.852
0.155
0.422
2.19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Report Date: 7/31 /2013 Page 25 of 36
analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686, Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1307412 Dept: ME
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013 QC Type: MSD -----
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPD Ref. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt e;. RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-001AMSD Date Analyzed: 07/26/20 13 1649h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Beryllium 0.197 mg/L E200.8 0.0000698 0.00200 0.2000 0 98.6 75 -125 0.198 0.365 20
Iron 1.01 mg/L E200.8 0.0472 0.100 1.000 0 101 75 -125 0.998 1.61 20
Lead 0.190 mg/L E200.8 0.00126 0.00200 0.2000 0 94.8 75-125 0.188 0.618 20
Manganese 0.235 mg/L E200.8 0.00166 0.00200 0.2000 0.0336 101 75 -125 0.224 4.47 20
Selenium 0.232 mg/L E200.8 0.000686 0.00200 0.2000 0.0205 106 75-125 0.227 1.85 20
Uranium 0.213 mg/L E200.8 0.0000598 0.00200 0.2000 0.0196 96.8 75 -125 0.211 0.920 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001EMSD Date Analyzed: 07/28/2013 2015h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Tin 0.963 mg/L E200.8 0.000620 0.00200 1.000 0 96.3 75-125 0.967 0.365 20
Lab Sample 10: 1307411-001AMSD Date Analyzed: 07/29/2013 1144h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Thallium 0.186 mg/L E200.8 0.000222 0.00200 0.2000 0.000398 93.0 75-125 0.185 0.531 20
Lab Sample 10: 1307412-001EMSD Date Analyzed: 07/29/2013 1212h
Test Code: 200.8-DIS Date Prepared: 07/19/2013 1145h
Thallium 0.186 mg!L E200.8 0.000222 0.00200 0.2000 0.000061 92.8 75-125 0.191 2.81 20 -Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001EMSD Date Analyzed: 07/23120 13 825h
Test Code: Hg-DW-DIS-245.1 Date Prepared: 07/22/2013 1200h --
Mercury 0.00357 mgiL E245.1 0.0000175 0.000150 0.003330 0 107 85-115 0.00349 2.21 20 ---------
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 26 of 36
i analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbc1 of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte Result Units Method
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-002CDUP Date Analyzed: 07/19/2013 1210h
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 3,170 mg/L SM2540C
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00lCDUP DateAnalyzed: 07/19/2013 1210h
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 860 mg/L SM2540C
MDL
8.00
8.00
Reporting
Limit
20.0
20.0
Dept: we
QC Type: DUP
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
3170 0 5
828 3.79 5
Report Date: 7/3112013 Page 27 of36
! analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RS7106
Test Code:
Chloride
Sulfate
300.0-W
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RS7161
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Fluoride
Result
Date Analyzed:
4.76
5.02
Date Analyzed:
4.59
4.70
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Dept: we
Units Method
07/22/2013 1250h
mg/L E300.0
mg/L E300.0
07/23/20 13 1651 h
mg/L E300.0
mg/L E300.0
MDL
0.0114
0.177
0.0114
0.0126
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.100
QC Type: LCS
Amount
Spiked
5.000
5.000
5.000
5.000
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
0
0
%REC
95.2
100
91.7
94.1
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RS7008 Date Analyzed: 07/19/2013 1139h
Test Code: ALK-W-23208
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 52,000 mg/L SM2320B 4.53 10.0 50,000 0 104
Lab Sample ID: LCS-26899 Date Analyzed: 07/29/2013 2054h
Test Code: NH3-W-350.1 Date Prepared: 07/29/2013 I 130h
Ammonia (as N) 0.999 mg/L E350.1 0.0277 0.0500 1.000 0 99.9 -Lab Sample ID: LCS-RS7135 Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 175lh
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 1.05 mg/L E353.2 0.00252 0.100 1.000 0 105
Lab Sample ID: LCS-RS7066 DateAnalyzed: 07/19/2013 1210h
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C ------
Total Dissolved Solids 204 mg/L SM2540C 4.00 10.0 205.0 0 99.5
Limits
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
80-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 28 of 36
i analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: MB-R57106
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Sulfate
Lab Sample ID: MB-R57161
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride
Fluoride
Lab Sample ID: MB-R57008
Test Code: ALK-W-23208
Bicarbonate (as CaC03)
Carbonate (as CaC03)
Lab Sample ID: MB-26899
Test Code: NH3-W-350.1
Result Units Method
Ammonia (as N) < 0.0500 mg/L
Lab Sample ID: MB-R57135
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) <0.100 mg/L E353.2
Lab Sample ID: MB-R57066 Date Analyzed: 07/19/2013 1210h
Test Code: TDS-W-2540C
Total Dissolved Solids < 10.0 mg/L SM2540C
MDL
0.00252
4.00
Reporting
Limit
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.100
10.0
10.0
0.100
10.0
Dept: we
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC Limits
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31 /2013 Page 29 of 36
1 analyses applicable Lo the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in acconJancc to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of Sllbscqucnl usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff. or reproduction or this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West QC SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1307412 Dept: we
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013 QC Type: MS
---
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount ~.REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-002BMS Date Analyzed: 07/22/2013 J612h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 24,000 mg/L E300.0 57.0 5,000 25,000 61.9 95.9 90-110
Sulfate 27,400 mg/L E300.0 885 5,000 25,000 1860 102 90-I 10
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IBMS Date Analyzed: 07/22/20 13 1909h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5,o70 mg/L E300.0 11.4 1,000 5,000 139 98.6 90-110
Sulfate 5,720 mg/L E300.0 177 1,000 5,000 394 107 90-110
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-003BMS Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 1745h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 498 mg/L E300.0 1.14 100 500.0 26.3 94.3 90-110
Fluoride 485 mg/L E300.0 1.26 100 500.0 0.592 96.8 90-110 -Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IBMS Date Analyzed: 07/19/2013 1139h
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 343 mg!L SM2320B 4.53 10.0 50.00 292 102 80-120
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-003DMS Date Analyzed: 07/29/2013 21llh
Test Code: NH3-W-350.1 Date Prepared: 07/29/2013 1130h
Ammonia (as N) 0.938 mg/L E350.1 0.0277 0.0500 1.000 0 93.8 90-110
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-003AMS Date Analyzed: 07/2312013 1800h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2 -
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.6 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 3.66 119 90-110
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IDMS Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 1812h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 14.0 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 2.06 119 90-110
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 7/31 /2013 Page 30 of 36
anaJyscs applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrf01mcd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the add1csscc. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any p1oduct or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1307412 Dept: we
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013 QCType: MSD
----
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-002BMSD Date Analyzed: 07/22/20 13 1728h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 23,900 mg/L E300.0 57.0 5,000 25,000 61.9 95 .2 90-110 24000 0.741 20
Sulfate 27,300 mg/L E300.0 885 5,000 25,000 1860 102 90-110 27400 0.514 20
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-001BMSD Date Analyzed: 07/22/2013 1934h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 5,140 mg/L E300.0 11.4 1,000 5,000 139 99.9 90-110 5070 1.26 20
Sulfate 5,740 mg/L E300.0 177 1,000 5,000 394 107 90-110 5720 0.299 20
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-003BMSD Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 1812h
Test Code: 300.0-W
Chloride 513 mg/L E300.0 1.14 100 500.0 26.3 97.4 90-110 498 3.11 20
Fluoride 502 mg/L E300.0 1.26 100 500.0 0.592 100 90-110 485 3.55 20
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IBMSD Date Analyzed: 07/19/2013 1139h
Test Code: ALK-W-2320B
Alkalinity (as CaC03) 344 mg/L SM2320B 4.53 10.0 50.00 292 104 80-120 343 0.291 10
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-003DMSD Date Analyzed: 07/29/2013 2112h
Test Code: NH3-W-350.1 Date Prepared: 07/29/2013 1130h
Ammonia (as N) 0.910 mg/L E350.1 0.0277 0.0500 1.000 0 91.0 90-110 0.938 3.05 10
Lab Sample ID: 1307411-003AMSD Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 1802h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2 -
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 15.6 mg/L E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 3.66 119 90-110 15.6 0.214 10
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IDMSD Date Analyzed: 07/23/2013 1813h
Test Code: N02/N03-W-353.2
Nitrate/Nitrite (as N) 13.8 m!VL E353.2 0.0252 1.00 10.00 2.06 117 90-110 14 1.13 10
1 -Matrix spike recovery indicates matrix interference. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 31 of 36
I analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in ac(.;orc.lancc: to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC.ll1is report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addrcssL-c. Privileges ofsub~equcnt usc of the name of this company or any
rnbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, 01 in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact~ TI1is company accepts no responsibility
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Kyle F. Gross
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone] Laboratory Director
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
American West ~SUMMARY REPORT ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Contact: Garrin Palmer
Lab Set ID: 1307412 Dept: MSVOA
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013 QCType: LCS --
Reporting Amount Spike Ref. RPDRef. RPD
Analyte Result Units Method MDL Limit Spiked Amount %REC Limits Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC 072213A Date Analyzed: 07/22/20 13 717h
Test Code: 8260-W
Benzene 19.2 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.149 2.00 20.00 0 96.2 62-127
Chloroform 20.8 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.277 2.00 20.00 0 104 67-132
Methylene chloride 22.7 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.155 2.00 20.00 0 113 32-185
Naphthalene 17.0 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.547 2.00 20.00 0 85.0 28-136
Tetrahydrofuran 17.4 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.874 2.00 20.00 0 87.2 43-146
Toluene 18.9 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.429 2.00 20.00 0 94.4 64-129
Xylenes, Total 59.2 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.870 2.00 60.00 0 98.7 52-134
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 56.2 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 I 12 76-138
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 52.7 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 105 77-121
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 53.4 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 107 67-128
Surr: Toluene-d8 50.6 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 101 81 -135
Lab Sample ID: LCS VOC 0719138 Date Analyzed: 07 I I 9/20 13 1348h
Test Code: 8260-W
Benzene 20.2 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.149 2.00 20.00 0 101 62-127
Chloroform 20.4 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.277 2.00 20.00 0 102 67-132
Methylene chloride 21.3 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.155 2.00 20.00 0 107 32-185
Naphthalene 18.2 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.547 2.00 20.00 0 90.8 28-136
Tetrahydrofuran 20.1 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.874 2.00 20.00 0 100 43-146
Toluene 19.9 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.429 2.00 20.00 0 99.4 64-129
Xylenes, Total 62.8 Jlg/L SW8260C 0.870 2.00 60.00 0 105 52-134
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 53.0 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 106 76-138
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 49.4 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 98.9 77-121
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 51.3 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 103 67-128
Surr: Toluene-d8 49.2 Jlg/L SW8260C 50.00 98.3 8 I -135
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 32 of36
t analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC p10tocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provid~.:d for the exclusive usc oft he adc.lrcssce1 Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report fm any pllTposc other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte Result
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
Units
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY :REPQRT
Method MDL
Reporting
Limit
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Amount
Spiked
Garrin Palmer
MSVOA
MBLK
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC 072213A Date Analyzed: 07/22/2013 755h
Test Code: 8260-W
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC 071913B
Test Code:
2-Butanone
Acetone
Benzene
8260-W
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
58.0
54.1
54.0
51.3
Date Analyzed:
<20.0
<20.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
llg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
llg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
1-1g/L SW8260C
llg/L SW8260C
)lg/L SW8260C
07/19/2013 1426h
~-tg/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
1-1g/L SW8260C
~-tg/L SW8260C
1-1g/L SW8260C
)lg/L SW8260C
)lg/L SW8260C
)lg/L SW8260C
)lg/L SW8260C
)lg/L SW8260C
)lg/L SW8260C
1.45
3.35
0.149
0.137
0.277
0.127
0.155
0.547
0.874
0.429
0.870
1.45
3.35
0.149
0.137
0.277
0.127
0.155
0.547
0.874
0.429
0.870
20.0
20.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
20.0
20.0
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
116
108
108
103
Limits
76-138
77 -121
67-128
81-135
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
ReportDate: 7/31/2013 Page33of36
analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accou.Jancc.: to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the atlachcd COC. This report is provided for the cx:t:lusivc usc of the adl1rcsscc, Privileges of subsequent usc oflhc name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be g1antcd only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: MB VOC 0719138
Test Code: 8260-W
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Result
Date Analyzed:
55.8
51.7
52.7
50.0
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
07/19/2013 1426h
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
11siL SW8260C
MDL
Reporting
Limit
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount
Spiked
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
112
103
105
99.9
Limits
76-138
77-121
67-128
81-135
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 34 of36
~analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the altachcd COC, This report is provided for the cxt:lusivc usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte Result
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00lAMS Date Analyzed:
Test Code: 8260-W
Benzene 18.5
Chloroform 19.7
Methylene chloride 20.6
Naphthalene 16.0
Tetrahydrofuran 14.4
Toluene 18.4
Xylenes, Total 56.0
Surr: l ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 58.0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 49.1
Surr: Dibrornofluoromethane 54.0
Surr: Toluene-d8 47.8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Reporting Amount
Units Method MDL Limit Spiked
07/22/2013 1358h
11g/L SW8260C 0.149 2.00 20.00
11g/L SW8260C 0.277 2.00 20.00
11g/L SW8260C 0.155 2.00 20.00
llg/L SW8260C 0.547 2.00 20.00
)lg/L SW8260C 0.874 2.00 20.00
11g/L SW8260C 0.429 2.00 20.00
11g/L SW8260C 0.870 2.00 60.00
)lg/L SW8260C 50.00
)lg/L SW8260C 50.00
llg/L SW8260C 50.00
)lg/L SW8260C 50.00
Garrin Palmer
MSVOA
MS
Spike Ref.
Amount %REC
0 92.5
0 98.3
0 103
0 79.8
0 72.2
0 92.1
0 93.4
116
98.2
108
95.6
Limits
66-145
50-146
30-192
41-131
43-146
18-192
42-167
72-151
80-128
80-124
77-129
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt %RPD Limit Qual
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 35 of36
:analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, <md RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent smnpling infonnation is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive usc oft he addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mber of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advc11isemcnr, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Lab Set ID: 1307412
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Analyte
Lab Sample ID: 1307412-00IAMSD
Test Code: 8260-W
Benzene
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: I ,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Result
Date Analyzed:
21.4
22.5
23.6
18.3
17.2
21.0
64.8
58.1
48.9
54.2
47.4
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC_8J]MMARY REPORT
Contact: Garrin Palmer
Units Method
07/22/2013 1417h
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
J.lg/L SW8260C
MDL
0.149
0.277
0.155
0.547
0.874
0.429
0.870
Reporting
Limit
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount
Spiked
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
60.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
Spike Ref.
Amount
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%REC
107
112
118
91.7
86.2
105
108
116
97.9
108
94.9
Limits
66-145
50-146
30-192
41-131
43-146
18-192
42-167
72-!51
80-128
80-124
77-129
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPDRef. RPD
Amt % RPD Limit Qual
18.5 14.6 25
19.7 13.4 25
20.6 13.8 25
16 13.8 25
14.4 17.6 25
18.4 12.9 25
56 14.5 25
Report Date: 7/31/2013 Page 36 of 36
I analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee, Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
mbcr of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
American West Analytical Laboratories UL
Denison
WORK ORDER Summa,ry
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Client ID: DENlOO
Project: Seeps and Springs 2013
Comments: PA Rush. QC 3 (Summary/No chromatograms).
Contact: Garrin Palmer
QC Level: III
WorkOrder: 1307412
Due Date: 7/31/2013
WO Type: Project
Page 1 of3
Project specific DL's: see COC. Run 200.8 on the Agilent. EDD-Denison and ElM-Locus. Email Group.
Metals were field filtered.; .:De>
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1307412-001A Enterance Seep 7/16/2013 0750h 7/19/2013 1010h 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge :J
Test· Group: 8260-W-Cusrom; # of'Anolyres: 11/ # ofSurr: 4
1307412-0018 300.0-W ~ df-wc
3 SEL:Analytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-wc
2 SEL Aruilytes: ALKB ALKC
1307412-001C TDS-W-2540C ~ ww-tds
I SEL Analytes: TDS
1307412-00 1D NHJ-W-350.1 kif df-no2/no3 & nh3
I SEL Analyle$: NH3N
NHJ-W-PR ~ df-no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no21no3 & nh3
1 SELAnalytes~· N03N02N
1307412-00lE 200.7-DIS ~ df-met
5 SELAnalytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR ~ df-met
'L 200.8-DIS 0 df-met
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO N/ SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR ~ df-met
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 ~ df-met
I SEL Anillytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR ~ df-met
IONBALANCE 0 df-met
5 SEL AJralytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
1307412-002A Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 0840h 7/19/2013 1010h 8260-W Aqueous I'll VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analyll!s: 11 !# ofSurr: 4
1307412-0028 300.0-W ~ df-we 1
3 SEL Anatyla:s: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~ df-wc
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
1307412-002C TDS-W-2540C ww-tds
I SEL Analylru: TDS
Printed: 7/19/2013 FOR LA BORA TORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M HOK __ _ HOK __ _ :/r3
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date
1307412-0020 Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013 0840h
1307412-002E
1307412-003A Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 0930h
1307412-003B
1307412-003C
1307412-0030
1307412-003E
Printed: 7/19/2013 FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0
Work Order: 1307412
Due Date: 7/31/2013
Page 2 of3
Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
711912013 1010h NHl-W-350.1 Aqueous df-no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL lfnalytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~ df-no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~ df-no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analyte.v: N03N02N
200.7-DIS ~ df-met
5 SEL Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR ~ df-met
200.8-DIS ~
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO N1 SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR ~
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 VI
1 SEL Analytes: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR ~
IONBALANCE ~
5 SEL Analyres: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Ca/c
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
df-met
7119/2013 IOIOh 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #oj"Analytes: 11/#ofSu": 4
300.0-W ~ df-we
3 SELAnalytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-2320B ~
2 SEL Analytes: ALKB ALKC
TDS-W-2540C 21
1 SELAnalyta: TDS
NH3-W-350.1 ~
1 SEL Analytes: NH3N
NH3-W-PR ~
N02/N03-W-353.2 ~
1 SEL llnofytes: N03N02N
200.7-DIS 21
5 SEL.Analytes: CA MG K NA V
200.7-DIS-PR 0
200.8-DIS lJI
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO NI SE AG
TLSNUZN
df-wc
ww -Ids
df-no2/no3 & nh3
df-no2/no3 & nh3
df-no2/no3 & nh3
df-met
df-met
df-met
200.8-DIS-PR ~ df-met
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 2J df-met
1 SEL Analyfe.$: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR ~ df-met
CN 0 TAT 0 QCO HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed. ____ _
"3
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1307 412 Page 3 of3
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc. Due Date: 7/31/2013
SampleiD Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Test Code Matrix Sel Storage
1307412-003£ Ruin Spring 7/16/2013 0930h 7/19/2013 1010h IONBALANCE Aqueous 0 df-met
5 SEL Analyte.s: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Calc
1307412-004A Back Spring 7/16/2013 0930h 7/19/2013 IO!Oh 8260-W Aqueous ~ VOCFridge 3
Test·Group: 8260-W-Cusfcm; #of Ana lyles: 11 I# of Surr: 4
!307412-004B 300.0-W IJl df-wc
3 SEL Anlllytes: CL F S04
ALK-W-23208 ~ df-wc
2 SEL J nalytes: ALKB ALKC
I307412-004C TDS-W-2540C 0 ww-tds
1 SEL Analytes: TDS
1307412-004D NHJ-W-350.1 ~ df-no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analyt?~; NH3N
NH3-W-PR 0 df-no2/no3 & nh3
N02/N03-W-353.2 21 df-no2/no3 & nh3
1 SEL Analytei: N03N02N
1307412-004E 200.7-DIS 0 df-met
5 SEL Ana(ytes; CA MG K NA V
200.7 -DIS-PR 0 df-met
200.8-DIS 0 df-met
17 SEL Analytes: AS BE CD CR CO CU FE PB MN MO N/ SE AG
TLSNUZN
200.8-DIS-PR ~ df-met
HG-DW-DIS-245.1 ~ df-met
1 SEL Analytes_: HG
HG-DW-DIS-PR 0 df-met
IONBALANCE 0 df-met
5 SEL Analytes: BALANCE Anions Cations TDS-Balance TDS-Ca/c
1307412-00SA Trip Blank 7/16/2013 7/19/2013 IOIOh 8260-W Aqueous 0 VOCFridge 3
Test Group: 8260-W-Custom; #of Analytes: 11 I# ofSurr: 4
Printed: 7/19/2013 FOR lABORATORY USE ONLY [fill out on page 1]: %M 0 RT 0 CN 0 TAT 0 QC 0 HOK __ _ HOK __ _ HOK___ COC Emailed. ____ _
American West Analytical Laboratories
Client: Energy Fuels Resources, Inc.
Address: 6425 S. Hwy. 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Project Name: Seeps and Springs 2013
PO#:
Sampler Name: Garrin Palmer
I ?Oi'-1\2
Chain of Custody Lab Sample Set # \ 3 Q=f 1 \ \ \ pf>
Page 1 J 1 ~~\~,l~ Contact: Garrin Palmer
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] QC Level: 3
Tum Around Time
Standard
Special Instructions: Email results to Garrin Palmer, Kethy Weinel, and David Turk
R.ellngulalt¢<1 by:
FIV!fName
Prtn! Nat114
ReJJnqul~lle<l y: ~
l'rlni.NCVTII!
A W AL-Analytical Scope of Work
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page 10 of13
Ammonia (as N) A4500-0.05 mg/L 28 days
NH3 G or
Nitrate & Nitrite (as N)
or
SW8260C
Benzene SW8260B · l.OJ.Lg/L 14 days
or
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon Tetrachloride l.Oj.Lg/L 14 days
Chloroform l.Ojlg/L 14 days
Chloromethane l.OJ.Lg/L 14 days
or
SW8260C
)])icbloromethane SW8260B l.Oj.Lg/L 14 days
(Methylene Chloride) or
l.OJ.Lg/L 14 days
or
SW8260C
Tetrahydrofuran SW8260B l.Oj.Lg/L 14 days
or
SW8260C
Toluene SW8260B l.OJJ.g/L 14 days
or
Xylenes l.OJ.I.g/L 14 days
or
SW8260C
HCl topH<2 ~6°C
HCI topH<2
HCltopH<2
HCltopH<2
HCltopH<2
HCltopH<2
HCl topH<2
HCltopH<2
~WI~~~~i~~~ .·;~~l ~J~.-c,;:~~-f~:~~~~.~~'c--·~--~ ~~~-:r~f:·~;ti:~.~-;·;1··:\ -~Y:-~ ·; ~::~~ j,_ ~ r!. :-.~~~-~ .--~i-~~-~~7;::_:_~·-~;:; s::J-:~~~~ ,_ .. ~ ::&;:;~~1
Fluoride A4500-F 0.1 mgiL 28 days None ~6°C
c or
E300.0
IDS A2540 c 10 mg/L 7 days None <6"C
A W AL • Analytical Scope of Work
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page 11 of13
Chloride
Sulfate
1 mg!L
lmg!L
28 days
28 days
14 days
14 days
14 days
None
None
HCltopH<2
HCI topH<2
HCl to pH<2
GEL-Allalytical Scope ofWorlc
White Mesa Mill Blanding Utah
Page 10 of9
Table 3 -GEL Groundwater, Tailings Impoundment, and Seeps and Springs Sampling
Table 4 Fee Schedule
:~~~:1~t:~{~:t.~f~}}-J~ij :''i~·~:2;.1·]}!:~i}~
Full Suite Metals
Partial Suite Metalll (cost per
individual metal)
. Gross alnha
**-per email from Kathy Weinel3/27/13 -RW
Run ION BALANCE when the full metals suite has been requested, per email from Kathy Weincl3/27/13
Ion Balance to include:
· Total Anions, Measured
· Total Cations, Measured
· IDS Ratio, Measured/Calculated
· IDS, Calculated -RW3/27113
Analysis
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02&N03
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TP04
Procedure:
Frequency:
Preservation Check Sheet
----
Preservative 00\ ·-rn-z -oc~ -·~
pH<2H2S04
PH<2H2S04
pH>12
NaOH
vH<2HN03 I~ V'fc.., ~ \{{2...<;
pH<2 H2S04 {le~ I\~R~ fJo5=-. JeS
pH<2HCL · r r if ,
pH<2H2S04
pH>9NaOH,
Zn Acetate
pH<2 H2S04
pH<2H2SO<t
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
'
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved, properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC, notify client if requested
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted
All samples requiring preservation
*
+ ..
#
•
The sample required additional preservative upon receipt.
The sample was received unpreserved
The Sample was received unpreserved and therefore preserved upon receipt.
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH < 2 due to the sample matrix
The sample pH was unadjustable to a pH > __ due to the sample matrix interference
Lab SetiD: 1~014\2-
[ijijl Laboratories LLc
a member of The GEL Group INC PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
August 02, 2013
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Re: White Mesa Mill GW
Work Order: 329986
Dear Ms. Weinel:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on July 22, 2013. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance
with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4505.
Purchase Order: DW16138
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
1111111 1111111111111111 ~
www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
White Mesa Mill GW
SDG: 329986
August 12, 2013
Laboratory Identification:
GEL Laboratories LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, South Carolina 29407
[phone]
Summary:
Receipt Narrative
for
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
SDG: 329986
Sample receipt: The samples arrived at GEL Laboratories LLC, Charleston, South Carolina on July 22, 2013 for
analysis. The samples were delivered with proper chain of custody documentation and signatures. All sample
containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. There are no additional comments
concerning sample receipt.
Sample Identification: The laboratory received the following samples;
Case Narrative:
Laboratory ID
329986001
329986002
329986003
329986004
Client ID
Enterance Seep
Cottonwood Spring
Ruin Spring
Back Spring
Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in GEL's Standard Operating Procedures. Any
technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are contained in the analytical
case narratives in the enclosed data package.
The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody, Cooler
Receipt Checklist, Data Package Qualifier Definitions and data from the following fractions: Radiochemistry.
Heather Shaffer
Project Manager
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: Gel Laboratories Contact: Garrin Palmer ----------=---------------2040 Savage Road Ph: 435 678 2108
Charleston, SC 29407 [e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . roject
Seeps and Springs 2013
Date
Sample 10 Collected
Enterance Seep 7/16/2013
Cottonwood Spring 7/16/2013
Ruin Spring 7/16/2013
Back Spring 7/16/2013
Comments:
Relinquished By:( Signature)
.. ,.. ....
s am piers N a me s am piers s· lgnature
Garrin Palmer t;,.......,.-p,.JA
Time
Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
750 Gross Alpha
840 Gross Alpha
930 Gross Alpha
930 Gross AIQ_ha
\ A .lfoA-.t' (_ ,. t VV'~ C~·d,J..
1"""'-.iL 1
"\-1 \ I C ... l"t..V '-.1
Date!fime Received By:{Signature)
7/18/2013
1200
Date!Time
~-aJ-13
ni3! J Laboratories LLC SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM
Client: l)NN\J:. SDG/ARICOC/WorkOrdcr: ~a qq~l..o_ 1 -~~~ q~ l
Received By: ~ t ..._Q . -~~ Dat~ Received: "":::/. -hlfJ, l ~ I
Suspected Hazard lnformallon ~ ~ *If Net Counts> lOOcpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
investigation.
COC/Samples marked as radioactive? y.., Maximum Net Counts Observed"' (Observed Counts -Area Background Counts): <9 c; (-/.IV\.
Classified Radioactive II or Ill by RSO? IX If yes, Were swipes taken of sample contatiners <action levels?
COC/Samples marked containing PCBs? ;<.
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as X beryllium or asbestos containing? If yes, samples are to be segregeated as Safety Controlled Samples, and opened by the GEL Safety Group.
Shipped as a DOT Hazardous? >{ Hazard Class Shipped: UN#:
Samples identified as Foreign Soil? ~
"'· _n Yl ""' 0
~"'"l' ·-··1' ... ~ ~ ~ ·~ . ... &V& ....... & .. ~ .. ~~
Shipping containers received intact 'X
Circle Applicable:
1 and sealed? Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Samples requiring cold preservation Preservation Method: Ice bags Blue ice Dry ice None Other (describe)
2 within (0 $ 6 deg. C)?* X ~I •all temperatures are recorded In Celsius
Daily check perfonned and passed on Device Serial#:
b/5 !)i/C,Lt 9 2a IR temperature gun? X. Secondary Temperature Device Serial II (If Applicable):
3 Chain of custody documents included
with shipment?
Sample containers intact and sealed? )( Circle Applicable:
4 Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
s Samples requiring chemical ~ Sample ID's, containers affected and observed pH:
preservation at proper pH? If •cltle.ct I nil/:
6 VOA vials free of headspace (defined Sample ID's and containers nffected:
as< 6mm bubble)?
(If yes, • deliver to Volatiles
7 Are Encore containers present? ~
l~o .... nl.,. received within holding X ID's and tests affected:
8 I time?
Sample ID's on COC match ID's on !Sample ID's and containers affected:
9 bottles?
Date & time on COC match date & X Sample ID's affected:
10 time on bottles?
Number of containers received match I~ Sample :b affected: • d l ~C..Oniu ~·n<iJ( e_~~ 11 number indicated on COC? ~ rs~
12 Are sample containers identifiable as
GEL provided?
13 COC form is properly signed in
X relinquished/received sections?
Circle Applicable:
FedEx Air FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
14 Carrier and tracking number.
§-3015 S ?J JJCL 020!/'l-
!Comments (Use Continuation Form if needed):
_j_
-,. ·-PM (or PMA) review: Initials ~~ Date 1/diX/13 Page_(
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
GEL Work Order/SDG: 329986
Client SDG: 329986
Seeps and Springs 2013
Project Manager:
Project Name:
Purchase Order:
Package Level:
EDD Format:
Heather Shaffer
DNMI00100 White Mesa Mill GW
DW16138
LEVEL3
EIM~DNMI
GELID Client Sample ID Client Sample Desc.
329986001 Enterance Seep
329986002 Cottonwood Spring
329986003 Ruin Spring
329986004 Back Spring
Collect
Date & Time
16-JUL-13 07:50
16-JUL-13 08:40
16-JUL-13 09:30
16-JUL -13 09:30
Work Order Due Date: 19-AUG-13
Package Due Date:
EDD Due Date:
Due Date:
HXS1
Receive Time #of
Date & Time Zone Cont.
22-JUL-13 09:35 -2 1
22-JUL-13 09:35 -2 1
22-JUL-13 09:35 -2 1
22-JUL -13 09:35 -2 1
16-AUG-13
19-AUG-13
19-AUG-13
Lab
Matrix
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
GROUND WATER
Report Date: 12-AUG-13
Work Order: 329986
Page 1 of 2
Collector: C
Prelogin #: 20130705879
Project Workdef ID: 1294356
SDG Status: Closed
Logged by:
Fax Days to Prelog Lab Field
Due Date Process CofC# Group QC QC
20
20
20
20
Client Sample ID Status Tests/Methods
Product
Reference Fax Date PM Comments Aux Data
Receive
Codes
-001 Enterance Seep
-002 Cottonwood Spring
-003 Ruin Spring
-004 Back Spring
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
REVW GFPC, Total Alpha Radium,
Liquid
Product: GFCTORAL Workdef ID: 1297250
Method:. EPA 900.1 Modified
Product Description: GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
Samples: 001, 002, 003, 004
Parmname Check: All parmnames scheduled properly
CAS# Parmname
Gross Radium Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
Gross Alpha
In Product Group? No
Action Product Name Description
Contingent
Tests
Group Name:
Client RDL or
PQL& Unit
Samples
Reporting
Units
pCi/L
Group Reference:
Path: Standard
Product Reference: Gross Alpha
Moisture Correction: "As Received"
Parm Included Included Custom
Function in Sample? in QC? List?
REG y y Yes
t
GEL Laboratories LLC -Login Review Report
Login Requirements:
Requirement Include? Comments
Peer Review by: ____________ _ Work Order (SDG#), PO# Checked? ____ _
Report Date: 12-AUG-13
Work Order: 329986
Page 2 of 2
C of C signed in receiver location? _____ _
List of current GEL Certifications as of 12 August 2013
State Certification
Alaska UST-110
Arkansas 88-0651
CLIA 42D0904046
California NELAP 01151CA
Colorado SC00012
Connecticut PH-0169
Delaware SC00012
DoD ELAP A2LA ISO 17025 2567.01
Florida NELAP E87156
Foreign Soils Permit P330-12-00283,P330-12-00284
Georgia SC00012
Georgia SDW A 967
Hawaii SC00012 --Idaho SC00012 -Illinois NELAP 200029
Indiana C-SC-01
Kansas NELAP E-10332
Kentucky 90129
Louisiana NELAP 03046 (AI33904)
Louisiana SDW A LAI30005
Maryland 270
Massachusetts M-SC012
Nevada SC000122011-1
New Hampshire NELAP 2054
New Jersey NELAP SC002
New Mexico SC00012
New York NELAP 11501
North Carolina 233
North Carolina SDW A 45709
Oklahoma 9904
Pennsylvania NELAP 68-00485
Plant Material Permit PDEP-12-00260
South Carolina Chemistry 10120001
r--South Carolina Radiochemi 10120002
Tennessee TN 02934
TexasNELAP Tl 04 704235-13-8
Utah NELAP scooo 122013-8
Vermont VT87156
Virginia NELAP 460202
Washington C780-12
Wisconsin 999887790
Method/ Analysis Information
Product:
Analytical Method:
Analytical Batch Number:
Sample ID
329986001
329986002
329986003
329986004
1202917400
1202917401
1202917402
1202917403
1202917404
Radiochemistry Case Narrative
Energy Fuels Resources (DNMI)
SDG 329986
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid
EPA 900.1 Modified
1318324
Client ID
Enterance Seep
Cottonwood Spring
Ruin Spring
Back Spring
Method Blank (MB)
329986001 (Enterance Seep) Sample Duplicate (DUP)
329986001(Enterance Seep) Matrix Spike (MS)
329986001(Enterance Seep) Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
The samples in this SDG were analyzed on an "as received" basis.
SOP Reference
Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by GEL Laboratories LLC as
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with
GL-RAD-A-010 REV# 15.
Calibration Information:
Calibration Information
All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.
Standards Information
Standard solutions for these analysis are NIST traceable or verified with a NIST traceable standard and used
before the expiration dates.
Sample Geometry
All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.
Quality Control (OC) Information:
Blank Information
The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.
Designated QC
The following sample was used for QC: 329986001 (Enterance Seep).
QC Information
All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding Time
All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis
None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
Chemical Recoveries
All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.
Miscellaneous Information:
Data Exception (DER) Documentation
Data exception reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced
SOP or contractual documents. A data exception report (DER) was not generated for this SDG.
Additional Comments
The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, 1202917402 (Enterance Seep) and 1202917403 (Enterance Seep),
aliquots were reduced to conserve sample volume.
Qualifier Information
Manual qualifiers were not required.
Certification Statement
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Qualifier Definition Report
for
DNMIOOl Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
Client SDG: 329986 GEL Work Order: 329986
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Review IV alidation
GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data reviewer. In addition, all CLP-like deliverables
receive a third level review of the fractional data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this data report:
Signature: Name: Kate Gellatly
Date: 14 AUG 2013 Title: Analyst I
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
Energy Fuels Resources (USA), Inc.
225 Union Boulevard
Suite 600
Contact:
Lakewood, Colorado
Ms. Kathy Weinel
Workorder: 329986
Parmname
Rad Gas Flow
3atch 1318324
QC1202917401 329986001
Gross Radium Alpha
QC1202917404 LCS
Gross Radium Alpha
QC1202917400 MB
Gross Radium Alpha
QC1202917402 329986001
Gross Radium Alpha
QC1202917403 329986001
Gross Radium Alpha
Notes:
DUP
MS
MSD
NOM
Uncertainty
555
Uncertainty
Uncertainty
1120
Uncertainty
1120
Uncertainty
QC Summary
Sample Qual QC Units
2.30 2.51 pCi/L
+/-0.299 +/-0.327
571 pCi!L
+/-4.51
u 0.344 pCi/L
+/-0.148
2.30 1070 pCi/L
+/-0.299 +/-8 .62
2.30 1200 pCi!L
+/-0.299 +/-9.68
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 68% confidence level (1-sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
**
<
>
Analyte is a surrogate compound
Result is less than value reported
Result is greater than value reported
The TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product
RPD%
8.78
11.8
A
B
BD
c
D
F
H
K
L
M
M
For General Chemistry and Organic analysis the target analyte was detected in the associated blank.
Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
Analyte has been confirmed by GC/MS analysis
Results are reported from a diluted aliquot of the sample
Estimated Value
Analytical holding time was exceeded
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M if above MDC and less than LLD
Matrix Related Failure
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
Nl See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
Reoort Date: August 14, 2013
Page 1 of
REC% Ran~e Anlst Date Time
(0%-20%) KDFl 08/11/13 10:2·
103 (75%-125%) 08/11113 10:2·
08/11113 I 0:2·
95.3 (75%-125%) 08/11113 10:2·
107 (0%-20%) 08/11113 10:2·
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407-[phone] -www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 329986
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst
NJ
Q
R
u
UI
UJ
UL
X
y
h
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative orDER.
Sample results are rejected
Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the CRDL.
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Gamma Spectroscopy--Uncertain identification
Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
QC Samples were not spiked with this compound
RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +1-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike cone. by a factor of 4 or more.
Page 2 of
Date Time
"The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/-the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
TabE
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
Table E-1 Holding Time Evaluation
Entrance Westwater Cottonwood Back Spring
Required Holding Time Seep Seep Seep Ruin Spring (duplicate of
Ruin Spring)
Major Ions
Carbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK
Bicarbonate 14 days OK OK OK OK
Calcium 6 months OK OK OK OK
Chloride 28 days OK OK OK OK
Fluoride 28 days OK OK OK OK
Magnesium 6 months OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Ammonia 28 days OK OK OK OK
Nitrogen-Nitrate 28 days OK OK OK OK
Potassium 6 months OK Not Sampled OK OK OK
Sodium 6 months OK -Dry OK OK OK
Sulfate 28 days OK OK OK OK
pH (s.u.) N/A OK OK OK OK
TDS 7 days OK OK OK OK
6 months (except
mercury which is 28
Metals days) OK OK OK OK
Radiologies 6 months OK OK OK OK
VOCS (including THF) 14 days OK OK OK OK
E-2 Labot·atory Receipt Temperatm·c Check
Wor~ Oi:der·l:'JumberllLab:>Se~.lD RecefP:t l'emp
AWAL-1307412 3.2°C
GEL-329986 N/A
N/ A = These shipments contained samples for the analysis of Gross
Alpha only. Per Table 1 in the approved QAP, samples submitted for
Gross Alpha analyses do not have a sample temperature requirement.
E-3: Analytical Method Check -Routine Samples
Parameter QAP/Permit Method Method Used by Lab
Ammonia (as N) A4500-NH3 G or E350.1 A4500-NH3 G
Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N) E353.1 or E353.2 E353.2
Metals except Iron E 200.7 or E200.8 E200.8
Iron E 200.7 or E200.8 E200.7
Gross Alpha E900.0 or E900.1 E900.1
VOCs except Tetrahydrofuran SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260B
Tetrahydrofuran SW8260B or SW8260C SW8260C
Chloride A4500-Cl B, A4500-Cl E, or E300.C A4500-Cl B
Fluoride A4500-F C or E300.0 A4500-FC
Sulfate A4500-S04 E or E300.0 A4500-S04 E
TDS A2540 C A2540 C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320 B A2320 B
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
E-4 Reporting Limit Evaluation
Parameter
Ammonia (as N)
Nitrate+ Nitrite (as N)
Metals ug/L
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Gross Alpha
VOCsug/L
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
MEK
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
Xylenes
Major Ions rng/L
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
TDS
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium
All analyses were reported to the required
RLs unless noted in the text.
Permit-Specified RL
25 mg/L
10 mg/L
50
4
5
100
730
1300
11000
15
800
2
40
100
50
100
2
17000
30
60
5000
15
700
5
5
70
30
4000
5
100
46
1000
10000
1
4
1
10
Not Specified
Not Specified
E-5: Trip Blank Evaluation
The trip blank for the 2013 sampling program was nondetect.
Blank Sample Date Laboratorx
1 7/16/2013 AWAL
E-6 Dupli.ca~c Sample Relative Percent Difference
Back Spring
Major Ions (mg/1) Ruin Spring (Duplicate of Ruin RPD%
Spring)
Carbonate <I <1 N/C
Bicarbonate 208 202 2.9
Calcium 149 152 2.0
Chloride 26.3 26 1.1
Fluoride 0.538 0.54 0.4
Magnesium 32.1 32.6 1.5
Nitrogen-Ammonia <0.05 <0.05 NIC
Nitrogen-Nitrate 1.56 1.54 N/C
Potassium 3.46 3.17 8.7
Sodium 118 118 0.0
Sulfate 553 555 0.4
TOS 952 984 3.3
Metals (ug/1)
Arsenic <5 <5 NIC
Beryllium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Chromium <25 <25 NIC
Cobalt <10 <10 N/C
Copper <10 <10 NIC
Iron <30 <30 NIC
Lead <1.0 <1.0 NIC
Manganese <10 <10 N/C
Mercury <0.5 <0.5 NIC
Molybdenum 16.1 16 0.44
Nickel <20 <20 N!C
Selenium 10.2 10.8 0.44
Silver <10 <10 NIC
Thallium <0.5 <0.5 N/C
Tin <100 <100 NIC
Uranium 9.12 9.16 0.4
Vanadium <15 <15 N/C
Zinc <10 <10 NIC
Radiologies (pCi/1)
Gross Alpha <1.0 <1.0 N/C
VOCS (ug!L)
Acetone NO NO NIC
Benzene NO NO N/C
Carbon tetrachloride NO NO N/C
Chloroform NO NO N/C
Chloromethane NO NO N/C
E-6 Duplicate Sample Relative Percent Difference
n~& pdng
Mlljor h~ns {rfi'gll} ~tuln ij1rlhg (Duplicate of Ruin RPD ;%
. pring}
MEK ND ND NIC
Methylene Chloride ND ND N/C
Naphthalene ND ND N/C
Tetrahydrofuran ND ND N/C
Toluene ND ND N/C
Xylenes ND ND N/C
N/C =Not Calculated
E-7 Radiologies Counting Error
1'1 Gross 'Alpha
Sf!mgle· IQ mlmg; Rn & U.
Emr~m~e.Sccp 2.3
We.stwarei Seep: NS
(1i:monwood Seep <1.0
Ruin: Spring <1.0
Back Spring
·cdu~licme ·If Ruin
S"otiM) <1.0
NS -Westwater Seep was dry and not
sampled 2013
Gr6ss,Aipha ·Cbuhtl g
mii1Us8n& u Errors_
PrecJsion (:f;.) 2Q%
0.299 y
NS NA
0.132 NA
0.125 NA
0.159 NA
·Withih
uWQS GWQS
15 NA
15 NA
15 NA
15 NA
15 NA
E-8: Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike% Rero cry Comparison
M&D
Lab RE~pQrl Well Analyte MS%REC %REC
1307412 Entrance Seep Calcium* NC NC
1307412 Entrance Seep Sodium* NC NC
1307412 Ruin Spring Nitrate+Nitrite as N 119 117
*Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sampe was greater than 4 times the spike amount
Surrogate % Recovery
All surrogate recoveries were within the laboratory established acceptance limits.
Method/Laboratory Reagent Blank detections
No analytes were detected in the laboratory blanks.
REC
Range RPD
70-130 NC
70-130 NC
90-110 1.13
TabF
CSV Transmittal
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1 :54 PM
Rusty Lundberg
'Phillip Goble'; 'Dean Henderson'; Harold Roberts; David Frydenlund; Jo Ann Tischler; David
Turk; Dan Hillsten; Frank Filas, P.E; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2013 Seeps and Springs Monitoring
1307 412-EDD.csv; 329986.csv
Attached to this e-mail are electronic copies of laboratory results for annual seeps and springs monitoring conducted at
the White Mesa Mill during 2013, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
1