DRC-2011-007633 - 0901a0688029173d

Sent VIA Federal Express
November 30,2011
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Co-Executive Secretary
Utah Water Quality Board
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 80265
USA
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.denisonmines.com
Re: Transmittal of 3rd Quarter 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Report
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitoring Report for the
3rd Quarter of 2011 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well
as two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
p,U~IY'~
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance and Permitting
cc: Ron F. Hochstein
David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Gtoundwa:ter Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
3rd Quarter
(July through September)
2011
Prepared by:
Denison Mine (USA) Corp.
Suite 950, 1050 171h Street
Denver CO 80265
November 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 IN"TRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1
1.1 GWDP Modifications During the Third Quarter ................................................. 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORIN"G ....................................................................... 1
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ....................................... 1
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring .......................................................... 1
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring .......................................................... 2
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring ....................................................................... 2
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................... 2
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring ..................................................................... 3
2.2 Field Data ............................................................................................................. 3
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling ............................................................ 3
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .......................................................................... 3
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 4
2.4 Laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring ..................................................... 4
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .......................................................................... 4
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 5
2.4.3 Compliance Status ........................................................................................ 5
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map ........................................ 5
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ....................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ...................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................. 7
3.4 Data Validation .................................................................................................... 7
3.4.1 Field Data QNQC Evaluation ...................................................................... 7
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation .............................................................................. 8
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ................................................................... 9
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist ........................................................................ 9
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation .......................................................................... 9
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation ................................................................................... 9
3.4.7 QNQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates ..................................... 9
3.4.8 Radiologics Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation .............................. 10
3.4.9 Other Laboratory QNQC ........................................................................... 10
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ...................................................................... 13
4.1
5.0
6.0
7.0
Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions ...................................... 13
TIME CONCENTRATION PLOTS ...................................................................... 13
ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT ................................................... 14
SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ................................................................ 15
i
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Well Sampling for the Period
Table 2 Exceedances and Acceleration Requirements
Table 3 GWCL Exceedances Through Third Quarter 2011 Under the February IS,
2011 and July 14, 2011 GWDP
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1AfB
G-2AfB
G-3AfB
G-4AfB
G-SAfB
G-6AfB
G-7AfB
G-8AfB
G-9AfB
Field Data QNQC Evaluation
Holding Time Evaluation
Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Analytical Method Check
Reporting Limit Check
Trip Blank Evaluation
QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Radiologics Counting Error
Laboratory Matrix QC
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the Routine Groundwater Monitoring Report, as required under Part 1.F.1 of State
of Utah Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") for the third
quarter of 2011 (the "quarter") for Denison Mines (USA) Corp's. ("DUSA's") White
Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill"). As required under Parts 1.E.1, 1.E.2 and I.E.5 of the
GWDP this Report includes all recorded field measurements and laboratory analyses for
well monitoring conducted during the quarter.
1.1 GWDP Modifications During the Third Quarter
During the third quarter of 2011, the approved February 15, 2011 GWDP was revised on
July 14, 2011. The revision incorporated changes necessary to address various activities
at the Mill. No changes were issued to the Groundwater Compliance Limits ("GWCLs")
specified in Table 2 or to the groundwater monitoring program described herein.
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing
wells, chloroform contaminant investigation wells and nitrate contaminant investigation
wells is attached under Tab A. Groundwater samples and measurements were taken
during this reporting period (January through March), as discussed in the remainder of
this section.
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring
Groundwater samples and field measurements collected during the third quarter included
both quarterly and accelerated monitoring. Accelerated monitoring is discussed below in
Section 2.1.2. In this third quarter report, samples classified as being collected quarterly
include those wells which are routinely sampled every quarter as well as semi-annual
wells which are sampled on an accelerated quarterly schedule due to exceedances
reported in previous quarterly reports. Wells which are sampled routinely every quarter
were analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 and Part 1.E.1.c) 2)ii of the GWDP
dated February 15, 2011 and July 14, 2011. The semi-annual wells which have been
accelerated to quarterly are analyzed only for those parameters which exceeded the
GWCLs in Table 2 and Part I.E.1.c) 2)ii of the GWDP as described in the 2nd Quarter
Groundwater Monitoring Report (DUSA August 31, 2011).
Table 1 of this report provides an overview of all wells sampled during the current
period, along with the required sampling frequency applicable to each well during the
current monitoring period, the date samples were collected from each well, and the
date(s) analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies). Table 1 also
indicates which sample numbers are associated with the required duplicates. During this
1
N:lRequired Report.\Groundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\2011 Q3\3,d Qtr 20 11 GW.doc
quarter, five wells and one duplicate were resampled due to preservation (pH) outside of
acceptance limits when the samples were received at the laboratory. In addition one well
and the duplicate were resampled because the laboratory inadvertently lost the thallium
sample aliquot for the duplicate sample (MW -70). The sample and its duplicate were
resampled for thallium. The following is a list of wells which were resampled:
• MW -14 was resampled for metals, nitrate, ammonia, and Gross Alpha minus
Rn222 and Uranium ("gross alpha") due to preservation issues.
• MW-18/MW-70 were resampled for thallium because the laboratory lost the
thallium aliquot for MW -70.
• MW-25, MW-26, MW-32, MW-35, and MW-65 (duplicate of MW-26) were
resampled for metals and gross alpha due to preservation issues.
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring.
In addition to the quarterly monitoring referenced above, accelerated monthly sampling
was performed, and results reported, for the wells indicated in Table 1. The accelerated
sampling frequency, analyte list and well list were determined based on the previously
reported analytical results and are included in Table 2 of this report.
Table 1 provides an overview of the wells sampled for the accelerated monthly program
along with the routine sampling frequency as well as the accelerated sampling frequency,
the date samples were collected from each well, the associated duplicates and the date(s)
which analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies).
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring
A requirement was added to the GWDP on February 15, 2011, which required the Mill to
begin quarterly sampling of wells MW-35, MW-36 and MW-37 to develop eight quarters
of background data. MW-35, which was installed in the third quarter 2010, has been
sampled quarterly since fourth quarter 2010. MW-36 and MW-37, which were installed
during the second quarter 2011, were sampled for the first time this quarter. Quarterly
samples will continue to be collected until 8 quarters of data are available to complete the
background report as required by the GWDP.
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed
All routine quarterly groundwater monitoring samples were analyzed for the parameters
listed in Table 2 and Part I.E.1.c) 2)ii of the GWDP dated February 15,2010 and July 14,
2011. The accelerated monitoring samples were analyzed for a more limited and specific
parameter list as shown in Table 2 of this report.
2
N:lRcquired ReportslOroundwaler QUailerly Monitoring Reporl12011 Q313rd QIr 2011 OW.doc
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant
to Part I.E.2 of the GWDP dated February 15, 2011and July 14,2011:
• The groundwater compliance monitoring wells including MW-20, MW-22, MW-
34, MW-3S, MW-36 and MW-37.
• Existing monitoring well MW -4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation
wells.
• Piezometers -P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-S.
• Nitrate monitoring wells.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and
accelerated efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All water levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded
within S calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the
summary sheet under Tab D.
2.2 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
quarterly effort for the groundwater compliance monitoring wells referred to in paragraph
2.1.1, above. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1.
Attached under Tab C are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
July and September 2011 accelerated monitoring and sampling efforts.
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results are provided by one of the Mill's two contract analytical
laboratories Energy Laboratories ("EL") or America West Analytical Laboratories
("AWAL").
Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results were reported to the Quality Assurance
("QA") Manager for each well.
Results from analysis of samples collected for the third quarter under the GWDP (i.e., all
regular quarterly and accelerated samples), are provided in Tab E. Also included under
3
N:lRequired ReponslGroundwater QuanOily Monitoring Repurtl201 j Q313rd Qtr 201 j GW.doc
Tab E are the results of analyses for duplicate samples for this sampling effort, as
identified in Table 1.
The laboratory report dates for samples collected for the July and September accelerated
sampling (i.e. quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Table 1. Results from
analysis of samples collected for the July and September accelerated sampling (i.e.
quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Tab F. Also included under Tab Fare
the results of analyses for duplicate samples for this sampling effort, as identified in
Table 1.
Copies of laboratory QNQuality Control ("QC") Summaries are included with the
reported data under their corresponding Tabs.
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
Under the GWDP (February 15, 2011 and July 14, 2011), background groundwater
quality has been determined on a well-by-well basis, as defined by the mean plus second
standard deviation concentration or the equivalent. New GWCLs that reflect this
background groundwater quality have been set for all monitoring wells in the January 20,
2010 GWDP. These new GWCLs were in effect for sampling required during the current
third quarter monitoring period.
Exceedances of the January 21,2010 GWCLs as reported in 2010 reports determined the
accelerated monthly monitoring program implemented during this quarter.
Exceedances of the GWCLs for the third quarter (July through September) of 2011 are
listed in Table 2 for sampling required under the revised GWDP (February 15,2011 and
July 14). Table 3 shows the accelerated sampling program which started in the second
quarter 2010 and shows the results and frequency of the accelerated sampling conducted
since that time.
It should be noted, however, that, because the GWCLs have been set at the mean plus
second standard deviation, or the equivalent, un-impacted groundwater would normally
be expected to exceed the GWCLs approximately 2.5% of the time. Therefore,
exceedances are expected in approximately 2.5% of all sample results, and do not
necessarily represent impacts to groundwater from Mill operations.
2.4 laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results for the accelerated monthly monitoring of the various constituents
in certain monitoring wells for the quarter are provided at Tab F.
4
N:IRequired RcporlslGroundwale,.Quartcrly Monitoring Repon12011 Q313rd Qlr201 ) GW.doc
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
As a result of the issuance of the revised GWDP on January 20, 2010, which sets revised
GWCLs, all requirements to perform accelerated monitoring under Part I.G.1 of the
previous GWDP ceased effective on January 20, 2010, and the effect of the issuance of
the revised GWDP was to create a "clean slate" for all constituents in all wells going
forward.
This means that accelerated monitoring during the third quarter 2011 was required under
the revised GWDP for only those constituents that exceeded the GWCLs in 2010.
2.4.3 Compliance Status
Analytes which have exceeded the GWCLs set forth in the GWDP are summarized in
Table 2. The analytes which exceeded their respective GWCLs during the third quarter
2011 will be sampled on an accelerated schedule as noted in Table 2. Analytes which
exceeded their respective GWCLs during 2010 are currently sampled on an accelerated
schedule. A review of the accelerated data collected during third quarter 2011 indicate
that several analytes have exceeded their respective GWCLs for two consecutive
sampling periods as reported in DUSA's letter to DRC on November 3, 2011. Table 3
summarizes the results of the accelerated sampling program from first quarter 2010
through first quarter 2011.
Part I.G.1 c) of the GWDP states, with respect to exceedances of GWCLs, "that the
Permittee shall prepare and submit within 30 calendar days to the Executive Secretary a
plan and a time schedule for assessment of the sources, extent and potential dispersion of
the contamination, and an evaluation of potential remedial action to restore and maintain
groundwater quality to insure that Permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance
monitoring point and that DMT or BAT will be reestablished." DUSA submitted an
exceedance notice on November 3,2011 for the third quarter 2011 results. The summary
in the Exceedance Notice includes, for each exceedance, a brief discussion of whether
such a plan and schedule is required at this time in light of other actions cUlTently being
undertaken by Denison, as determined by Utah Department of Environmental Quality
("UDEQ") Staff and stated in teleconferences with Denison on April 27 and May 2,
2011. The applicability of the plans and time schedules for assessment was submitted to
the Executive Secretary in the November 3,2011 Exceedance Notice.
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the quarter (shown as depth to
groundwater in feet) is included under Tab D. The data from Tab D has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under Tab H.
The water table contour map provides the location and identity of all of the wells and
piezometers for which depth to groundwater is recorded. The groundwater elevation at
each well and piezometer, measured in feet above mean sea level, and isocontour lines to
5
N:IRequircd RepollslGruundwaler Quarterly Moniloring Repor[12011 Q313rd QIr 20 11 GW.doc
delineate groundwater flow directions observed during the quarter's sampling event, are
displayed on the map.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
The Mill QA Manager performed a QNQC review to confirm compliance of the
monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures,
an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of laboratory data methods
and data. Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in
Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures
("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness review results are provided
in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check laboratory data QNQC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.4 through 3.4.9 below.
The Analytical Laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QNQC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol.
The analytical laboratory QNQC Summary Reports, including copies of the Mill's Chain
of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms for each set of Analytical Results,
follow the analytical results under Tabs E and F. Results of review of the laboratory
QNQC information are provided under Tab G and discussed in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following field QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the
analytical laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field
sampling program:
Two duplicate samples were collected during quarterly sampling as indicated in Table 1.
The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as permit-required samples.
One duplicate sample was collected during each month of accelerated sampling as
indicated in Table 1. The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and
analyzed for the same accelerated parameters as the parent sample.
Two trip blanks were provided by EL and returned and analyzed with the quarterly
monitoring samples.
One trip blank per month was provided by EL and returned and analyzed with the
accelerated monthly monitoring samples.
Two trip blanks were provided by AWAL and returned and analyzed with the quarterly
monitoring samples.
6
N:lRequired ReportslOroundwaler Quarterly Monitoring Reporl120 II Q313rd Qlr 20 II OW.doc
One trip blank per month was provided by A W AL and returned and analyzed with the
accelerated monitoring samples.
Rinsate samples were not collected during the third quarter 2011 because all equipment
used during sample collection was dedicated and did not require decontamination. All
wells except MW-37 have dedicated pumps for purging and sampling and as such no
rinsate blanks samples are required. MW-37 was sampled with a disposable bailer and
no rinsate blank was required. A deionized field blank (DIFB) was not required because
equipment decontamination was not required and deionized water was not used during
this sampling event.
Duplicate and trip blank sample results are shown in Tab G.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA
Manager observed that QAlQC requirements established in the QAP were being adhered
to and that the SOP's were implemented, except as described below.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for the quarterly wells were performed. The
accelerated quarterly sampling (quarterly to monthly and semi-annual to quarterly)
required for this quarter, as shown in Tables 2 and 3, was performed.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the groundwater monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements,
the QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QAlQC evaluation, a
receipt temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting
limit check, a trip blank check, a QAlQC evaluation of routine sample duplicates, a
QAlQC evaluation of accelerated sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QAlQC information. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results
of each test are provided under Tab G.
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their
adherence with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of
information: the Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet.
Review of the Field Data Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five
parameters: conductance, pH, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the
Depth to Water data confirms that all depth measurements were conducted within a five-
day period. The results of this quarter's review are provided in Tab G.
7
N:IR<quired ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Reporl120 II Q313rd Qlr 20J I GW.doc
Based upon this review, all quarterly sampled locations conformed to the QAP
requirement to evacuate two well casing volumes before sampling except for MW-3A,
MW-12, MW-23 , MW-24 , and MW-37. In all cases these wells were evacuated to
dryness before two casing volumes could be purged.
All accelerated sampled locations conformed to the QAP requirement to evacuate two
well casing volumes before sampling.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel
consistently recorded depth to water for the quarterly and accelerated sampling programs
to the nearest 0.01 foot.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Section 6.2.7 specifically state that
field parameters have to be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive
measurements. The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephlometric
Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that
has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements greater than 5 NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Turbidity measurements were less than 5 NTU for all of the quarterly wells
except MW-5, MW-ll, MW-23 , MW-27, MW-29, MW-32, MW-32 res ample
and MW-37. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less than 5
NTU prior to sampling. Per the QAP Section 6.2.7 d) (v) Turbidity measurements
prior to sampling were within a 10% Relative Percent Difference ("RPD") for all
quarterly sampling wells.
• Turbidity measurements were less than 5 NTU for all of the accelerated sampling
wells except MW -11. Turbidity measurements prior to sampling were within a
10% RPD for all accelerated sampling wells
DUSA's letter to DRC of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not appear
to be an appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to DRC's
subsequent correspondence dated June 1,2010 and June 24, 2010, DUSA has completed
a monitoring well redevelopment program. The redevelopment report was submitted to
DRC on September 30, 2011. Redevelopment results will be discussed with DRC in an
effort to come to a consensus regarding turbidity considerations for the groundwater
wells at the Mill site.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample
holding time checks are provided under Tab G. All samples were received and analyzed
within the required holding time.
8
N:lRcquiretl ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Moniloring Reportl2011 Q313rtl Qtr 2011 GW.doc
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets (for A W AL) and temperature blank data sheets (for EL) were
reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in QAP Table 1 that samples
be received at 6°C or lower. Sample receipt temperature checks are provided under Tab
G. All quarterly and accelerated samples were received within the required temperature
limit.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required
methods specified in Table 1 of the QAP. Analytical method check results are provided
in Tab G. The review indicated that all quarterly and accelerated samples were analyzed
in accordance with Table 1 of the QAP.
It is recommended that the QAP be improved and updated to include additional
methodologies currently in use by other laboratories certified under the Environmental
Lab Certification Program administered by the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality ("UDEQ") Bureau of Lab Improvement. Potentially, to accommodate ongoing
improvement in technology and methodology, the entire Table 1 and the Chloroform
Investigation Appendix table should be revised to include other currently approved
analytical methods in use by other Utah certified laboratories.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories were checked against
the reporting limits specified in the QAP Table 1. Reporting limit evaluations are
provided in Tab G. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting
limits except several sets of routine and accelerated sample results had the reporting limit
raised for at least one anaiyte due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution as noted
in Section 3.4.9. In all cases the reported value for the analyte was higher than the
increased detection limit.
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blank results were reviewed to identify any blank contamination. Trip blank
evaluations are provided in Tab G. All trip blank results associated with both the
quarterly and accelerated samples were less than detection level for all VOCs.
3.4.7 QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of
duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the
duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured
results (described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
9
N:lRequired RcponslOroundwatcr Quanerly Monitoring Reponl20 II Q313rd Qtr 2011 GW.doc
limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994,9240.1-05-01 as cited
in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all duplicate pairs with detections in both the
parent and duplicate sample for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported
concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits; however, data will
be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times the required
detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional duplicate information is
provided for information purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the quarterly samples except for the
uranium result in the duplicate pair MW-26/MW-65. Duplicate results are provided
under Tab G.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the accelerated samples. Results of the
RPD test are provided under Tab G.
3.4.8 Radiologies Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation
Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity
equal to or greater than the GWCL, shall have a counting variance that is equal to or less
than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An error term may be greater than 20%
of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the activity concentration and
error term is less than or equal to the GWCL.
Section 9.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided in the text. The quarterly and
accelerated sample and duplicate results met the comparability check specified in the
QAP.
Results of quarterly and accelerated radiologic sample QC are provided under Tab G. All
quarterly and accelerated radiologic sample results met the counting error requirements
specified above.
3.4.9 Other Laboratory QAlQC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QNQC Manager check the
following items in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct
and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate analytical
laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5)
QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7)
special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8)
documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above,
DUSA's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to confirm
that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike
duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check
10
N:IRequircd RcportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Reportl20 II Q313rd Q,r 2011 GW.doc
are provided under Tab G. All lab QNQC results from both EL and A W AL samples for
compounds regulated under the GWDP met these requirements. There were QC results
which did not meet laboratory established acceptance limits, as identified in Tab G and
described below.
There were no qualifiers attached to the A W AL tetrahydrofuran data.
Fourteen sets of quarterly sample results (twelve wells and two duplicates) and seven sets
of accelerated samples (six samples and one duplicate) had the reporting limit raised for
at least one analyte due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution. In all cases the
reported value for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit. Data are
qualified by the laboratory with a "D" flag when the reporting limit is raised due to
dilution or matrix interferences.
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control
spike ("LCS"), a matrix spike ("MS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the
equivalent, where applicable. It should be noted that:
• Laboratory fortified blanks are equivalent to LCSs.
• Laboratory reagent blanks are equivalent to method blanks.
• Post digestion spikes are equivalent to MSs.
• Post digestion spike duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
• For method E900.1, used to determine gross alpha, a sample duplicate was
used instead of a MSD.
All qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QNQC Summary
Reports for any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods were reviewed by
the QA Manager.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD (referred to as Duplicate Spike [Matrix
spike] in the QAP) pair be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not
specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the
MS/MSD pair be prepared on DUSA samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are
set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the
data packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each
analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were
reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits. The QAP
does not require this level of review and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly samples were within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab G.
The recoveries and RPDs which are outside of the laboratory established acceptance
limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the recoveries and RPDs
outside of the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference. Furthermore, the
11
N:lRequired ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring ReporLI2011 Q313rd Qlr 20 II GW.doc
quarterly VOC sample (C11080529) and two of the metals samples (CI1090045) that
were spiked for the MS/MSD analyses were not collected at the Mill, and as such the
matrix interference is not applicable to the Mill samples reported herein. The QAP
requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such
the data are compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all accelerated samples were within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab G.
The percent recovery for the July monthly manganese sample in (Cl1070824) spiked for
the MS/MSD analyses was not collected at the Mill, and as such the matrix interference is
not applicable to the Mill samples reported herein. The QAP requirement to analyze a
MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are compliant with
the QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses
but the QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The analytical
data associated with the quarterly and accelerated sampling met the requirement specified
in the QAP. The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates
that the surrogate recoveries for all quarterly samples were within acceptable laboratory
limits for all surrogate compounds except as indicated in Tab G. In all instances the
surrogate recoveries outside of acceptance limits were above the upper limit or had a high
recovery, indicating a high bias to the individual sample results. A high bias means that
reported results for this analyte will tend to be higher than the actual concentration.
There is no effect on the quality or usability of the data because there are multiple
surrogates added to each sample and all other surrogates were within limits. Furthermore,
there are no QAP requirements for surrogate recoveries. Since surrogate compounds
were added to all of the organic analyses as required by the QAP, the data are compliant
with the QAP requirements.
The information from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries for both the quarterly and accelerated samples were within acceptable
laboratory limits for all LCS compounds.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a
reagent blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a blank sample
made and carried through all analytical steps. For the Mill samples, a method blank is
prepared for all analytical methods. Per the approved QAP, contamination detected in
analysis of method blanks will be used to evaluate any analytical laboratory
contamination of environmental samples. The QAP does not specify the process for
evaluation of method blanks. For consistency, the QAP required evaluation criteria for
rinsate blanks will be used. The QAP criteria for rinsate blanks states that
nonconformance will exist when blanks are within an order of magnitude of the sample
results. Two analytes (selenium in the July accelerated samples and bicarbonate in the
third quarter samples) were reported in the method blanks from EL. Method blank results
are included in Tab E. In all cases where the associated sample reported a positive
12
N:IRequired Rep0rlslGmundwater Quarterly MonitOring Reportl2011 Q313rd Qtr 2011 GW.doc
detection, the method blank results were less than an order of magnitude relative to the
positive sample results reported, that is the detections meet the QAP criteria. The method
blank detections reported by EL do not affect the quality or usability of the data due to
the high level of the constituents in the samples relative to the associated method blank
concentrations. Additionally, blank detections are indicative of a false positive or high
bias to the sample results as the laboratory contribution to the results would likely cause
higher sample results. The QAP requirement to analyze a method blank with each batch
and evaluate the results has been completed as required.
It is important to note that the selenium detection in the method blank for the July
accelerated samples is the result of the low reporting limit (RL) used by EL for selenium,
which is lower than the RL for selenium used for the samples. The corrective action for
method blank detections in the Second Quarter 2011 Groundwater Report, submitted
August 31, 2011, specified that the RLs for method blanks would be changed to be the
same as the sample RLs. This corrective action was implemented as described in the
Second Quarter 2011 Groundwater Report beginning with the samples collected in
August 2011. The July data were received prior to completion of the corrective action
report submitted with the Second Quarter 2011 Groundwater Report on August 31, 2011.
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
There are no corrective actions resulting from third quarter 2011 groundwater sampling
event.
4.1 Assessment of Previous Quarter's Corrective Actions
The second quarter 2011 report identified a corrective action for 29 low level detections
in the method blanks.
An investigation into the low level method blank detections in the second quarter of 2011
was completed by the QA Manager. The investigation indicated that the RLs used by the
laboratory for method blanks are below the QAP-required RLs used for groundwater
samples which results in numerous false detections to be reported in the method blanks.
DUSA directed EL to use the same QAP-required RLs for the method blanks as are used
for the groundwater samples to eliminate false reports of analytes in the method blanks
below the levels that are reported in the groundwater samples. The corrective action was
successful as the number of method blank detections reported in the third quarter 2011
decreased significantly and the problem has been eliminated. No further corrective
action is necessary at this time.
5.0 TIME CONCENTRATION PLOTS
Time concentration plots for each monitoring well for the following constituents:
chloride, fluoride, sulfate, and uranium, are included under Tab 1. Time concentration
plots are completed consistent with the EPA Document Statistical Analysis of
13
N:lRequired Rep0rlslGroundwalcr Quarterly Monitoring Rcporll20 II Q3131 d Qlr 20 II GW.doc
Groundwater Monitoring Data at ReRA Facilities, Unified Guidance, March 2009
(EPA530/R-09~007). F~r the p~ose of these plots, onlr extrem~ outliers (any value that
exceeds three hmes the mterquarttle range above the 75t percentile and below the 25 th
percentile) are removed. For the purpose of compliance, extreme outliers are not
removed.
6.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
DUSA has provided to the Executive Secretary electronic copies of all laboratory results
from groundwater quality monitoring conducted during the quarter in Comma Separated
Values ("CSV"), from the EL data; and in Electronic Data Deliverable C'EOD") format
from the A W AL data. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under Tab J.
14
N;\I4<lulre.l Repon.,IUroIJI1<iWllll'f QII,,""fly Muniloting Repnn\2QI I Q3\31'tl Qlf 2011 .W.doc
7.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Denison Mines (USA) Co rp. on November 30, 201 1.
DENISON MINES (USA) CO RP.
By:
Dav i . ry enlund
Vice President, Regularory Affairs and Counsel
15
Certification:
T certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachment were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a y tern de igned to
as. nre that qualified per onnel properly gatber and evaluate the information ubmitted.
Ba ed on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage tbe ystem, or tbose per ons
directly responsible for gathering tbe information, the information ubmitted i , to the
best of my knowl.edge and belief, true, accUJate, and complete. I am aware that there are
ignificant p nalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
nt f r knowing violations.
Dav'
Vice Pre ide t, Regulatory Affairs and Counsel
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
16
N:IR(.,<!uu(.'flllcpon H"undwu,crQ)lnnclly MonilorinS Reporl\2011 QJ\JnJ Qlr2011 OW.doe
Tables
Table I: Summary of Well Sampling for Q3 20 II
Purpose for Sampling
WeD Normal Frequency this Quarter Sample Date Date of Lab Report
Quarterly Samples
MW-11 Quarterly Quarterly 8/3/2011 9/19/2011 (8/12/2011)
MW-14 Quarterly Quarterly 8/31201l 9/19/2011 (8/12/2011)
MW-14 res ample Quarterly Quarterly 8/30/2011 10/4/2011 **
MW-2S Quarterly Quarterly 8/3120ll 9/19/2011 (8112/2011)
MW-25 res ample Quarterly Quarterlv 8/30/2011 10/4/2011 * *
MW-26 Quarterly Quarterly 8/3/201l 9/19/2011 (811212011)
MW-26 resample Quarterly Quarterly 8/30/201 I 10/412011 **
MW-30 Quarterly Quarterly 8/3/201l 9/1912011 (8/12/2011)
MW-31 Quarterly Quarterly 812/2011 9119120 II (8112/2011)
MW-35 Quarterly Background 8/2/2011 9/19/2011 (8/1212011)
MW-35 resample Quarterly Background 8/30/201l 10/4/2011 **
MW-36 Quarterly Background 8/912011 9/[41201 I
MW-37 Quarterly Background 8/ll/2011 9/141201 I
MW-65 I per Batch Duplicate of MW-26 8/312011 9/19/2011 (8/1212011)
MW-65 resample I per Batch Duplicate of MW-26 8/30/201 I 10/41201 1**
Accelerated Sam{>les
Accelerated Quarterly Samples
MW-2 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/8/2011 9/1412011
MW-3 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/1012011 9/14/201 I
MW-3A Semi-annually Accelerated S/ll/2011 9/1412011
MW-5 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/912011 9/1412011
MW-12 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/9/2011 9/1 4120 II
MW-IS Semi-annually Accelerated 8/10/201 I 9/[4/201 I
MW-IS resample Semi-annually Accelerated 9/2 1I20 I I 1014/2011 ***
MW-19 Semi-annually Accelerated 7/20/201 I Field pH 7/20/20 I I
MW-23 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/4/201 I Field pH 8/4/201l
MW-24 Semi-annually Accelerated S/4/2011 9/19/201 I
MW-27 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/8/201 I 9/14/201 I
MW-28 Semi-annually Accelerated S/8/201 I 9/14/201 I
MW-29 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/912011 9/[41201 I
MW-32 Semi-annually Accelerated 8/21201 I 9/1912011
MW-32 resample Semi-annually Accelerated 8/30/2011 10/4/20 II **
MW-70 I per Batch Duplicate ofMW-18 8/1012011 9/1412011
MW-70 resample I per Batch Duplicate of MW -18 9/2112011 1014120 I 1***
Accelerated July Monthly
MW-11 Monthly Accelerated 7/6/2011 6/[5/20 I I (7112/20 I 1)
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 7/5/201 I Field pH 7/5/2011
MW-25 Monthly Accelerated 7/6/2011 8/1/201 I
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 7/6/201 I 8/1/2011
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 7/5/2011 8/[1201 I
MW-31 Monthly Accelerated 7/5/2011 8/[1201 I
MW-35 Monthly Accelerated 712012011 8/10/201 I
MW-65 I per Batch Duplicate of MW-3 I 7/5/2011 8/1/201 I
Accelerated June Monthly
MW-II Monthly Accelerated 91712011 10/4120 II (9/[512011)
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 9/S12011 Field pH 9/8120 II
MW-2S Monthly Accelerated 91712011 10/412011
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 9171201 I 10/412011
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 91712011 10/4/2011
MW-31 Monthly Accelerated 9/6/2011 1014/2011
MW-35 Monthly Accelerated 9171201 I 10/412011
MW-65 I per Batch Duplicate of MW-35 9171201 I 10/4/201 I
Notes:
Date in parenthesis depicts the date that tetrahydrofuran was reported from American West Analytical Laboratories. All other constituents were
reported from Energy Laboratories.
** Resampled because sample preservation (pH) outside acceptance limits when samples were received at the lab.
**. Resampled for thallium only due to an inadvertent lab omission of the thallium analysis from the duplicate sample.
Tnblc2
Monitoring WeU GWCLln First Result Routine Sample Accelerated Exceedance Start of Accelerated Constituent Exceeding GWCL Exceeding the (Water Class) Current GWDP GWCL Frequency Frequency Sample Period Monitoring
Quar(~rly Wells Accelerated to Momhly SAnlplillg'
MW-II (Class II) Manganese [ugIL) 131.29 134 Quarterly Monlhly QI 2010 May 2010
Telrahydrofuran (uJ1/Ll 11.5 12 Quarter]y Monlbly Q12010 Mav2010'
MW-14 (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.45 Quarlerly Monlhly QI2010 May2010
MW-25 (Class Ill) Uranium (ug/L) 6.5 6.57 Quarlerly Monlhly Q32010 January 2011"
Field 011 S.U. 6_' -R.5 6.36 uarleriv Monlh)y 42010 Januarv 20 II
NII.mlc+ Nilrile (II~ N) (m..IIL) 0.62 1.3 Quarlerlv Munlhty Q12010 May 2010
Uranium (ugIL) 41.8 58.7 Quarlerlv Monlhly 012010 May 2010
Chloroform (uolL) 70 700 Quarlerly Mumbly QI2010 May2010
MW-26 (Class Ill) Chloride m' I, 5i!31 72 uarledv Monthly 12UIO Mav2010
Mf!J hyl.n· Chhlrid. ,,,ilL -' 9.9 ( oarlerly MOnlhly 22010 June2010
Field pH IS.U.) 6.74 -8.5 6.59 Quarlerly Monlhly QI2010 Mav 2010
'fDS ml!!l. 3284.19 3440 Ouarlerly Monlhly 32010 January 20 II'
Nilrale + Nilrile (as N) (mgIL) 2.5 16.1 Quarlerly Monlhly QI2010 May2010
MW-30 (Class II) Chloride (mgIL) 128 134 Quarlerly Monlhly QI2011 May 2011
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 5.66 Quarterly Monlbly Q22011 July 2011
Selenium (ugIL) 34 35.3 Quarterly Monlhly Q22010 July 2010
Nilrale + Nilrile (as N) (mgIL) 5 21.7 Quarlerly Monlbly QI2010 May 2010
TDS (mgIL) 1320 1330 Quarlerly Monlhly Q32010 January 20 II"
MW-31 (Class III) Sui fale (mgIL) 532 539 Quarlerly Monlhly Q42010 Mareb 2011
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.16 Quarlerly Monlhly Q22011 July 2011
Chloride (m~/L) 143 145 Quarterly Monthly Ql2011 May2011
Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 21.7 Quarlerly Monlhly Q22011 July 2011
Thallium (ugiL) 0.5 0.52 Quarterly Monthly Q32011 November 201 I
MW -35 (Class II) Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCiIL) 3.75 4.5 Quarterly Monthly Q32011 November 2011
Manganese (ug/L) 200 369 Quarlerly Monlhly Q22011 July 2011
Semi-Annual Wells Accelerated to Ouarterly Sarno]iru •
Monitnring Well GWCLin First Result Sample Accelerated Exceedance Start of Accelerated
(Water Class) Constituent Exceeding GWCL Current GWDP Exceeding the Frequency Frequency Sample Period Monitoring GWCL
MW-2 (Class III) Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCiIL) 3.2 3.5 Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q42010 QI2011
MW-3 (Class JII) Selenium (ugIL) 37 37.2 Semi·Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.14 (6.25) Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Fluuride (mgIL) 0.68 0.71 Semi·Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.23 (6.24) Semi·Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
MW-3A (Class III) Sulfale (mgIL) 3640 3680 Semi-AnnuaJly Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
TDS (mj!/l) 5805 5860 Semi-Annuallv uarlerly _Q22010 Q32010
SelenIum Iwn. Kg 94.8 Scmi·AnnuallY OU.flU,·lv 042010 201
MW-5 (Class II) Uranium (ugIL) 7.5 11.6 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q42010 012011
Field oH [S.U.) 6.5 -M_~ 6.47 Semi-Annuallv uarlerlv 42010 12011 MW -12 (Class III) Selenium (ugIL) 25 25_7 Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Thallium (ugIL) 1.95 373 Semi·Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-18 (Class 1Il) Sulfale (mgIL) 1938.9 1950 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 6.2 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
oms (mgl1,) 3198.77 3280 Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
MW -19 (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5 6.61 (6.66) Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
MW-23 (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 1i.5 -8.5 6.18 Semi·Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
MW-24 (Class III) Cadmium (ugIL) 2.5 4.28 Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Thallium (ugIL) I 1.3 Semi·Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field rH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 5.91 (5.78) Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Nilrale + Nittile (as N) (mgIL) 5,6 5.8 Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
MW-27 (Class III) Chloride (mgIL) 38 42 Semi-Annually QUdrLcrly Q22010 Q32010
Sulfale (mgIL) 462 469 Semi·Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Fiel,l pH (S.U_) 6.5 -8.S 6.39 Semi-AnnuaUy Quarterly Q32011 042011
TDS (mgIL) 1075 1160 Semi·Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
MW-28 (Class 1Il) Chloride (mgIL) 105 108 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.1 -8.5 5.67 Semi-Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
MW-29 (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.46 -8.5 6.17 Semi-Annually Quarterly 042010 Q2201l
Iron (ugIL) 1869 3010 Semi-Annually QuuI\erly Q22011 July 2011
MW-32 (Class III) Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (pCiIL) 3.33 5.4 Semi·Annually Quarlerly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8_5 6.03 Semi-Annually Qunrterly Q22010 Q32010
Noles:
• GWCL Values arc laken frum February 15.2011 and July 14.2011 version oflhe GWDP .
• THF has nol reporled an exceedance since Q I 2010 and has had 16 conseculive monoliring rcsulls below Ihe GWCL. UDEQ requires conlinued moniloring oflhi. coosliluent.
•• Table 2 uflhe 2010 Q3 Groundwaler reporllisled Ibe starl ofaceeleraled moniloring as Q42010. Acceleraled monitoring began in QI 2011. o Values lisled in parenlheses are resample resulls from Ihe same sampling period. Sampled were recollecled due field or laboralory problems as nUled in Ihe specific reporl for
Ihal sample period.
Higbligbted lexl sbows accelerated requirements resulting from Q3 2011 sampling event.
Table 3 -GWCL Exceedances for Third Quarter 2011 under the July 14,2011 GWDP
Q12010 Results Q2 2010 Results CU 2010 Results Q4 Z010 Results
I ,MonItoring GWOL In July May 2010 May 2010 June2(UO June 2010 JUly 2010 August 2010 Odober20UJ October 2010 December December
Well (Water Constituent ~dlDfl 14, 2011 QI2010 QI2010 Q12OIO Q12010 Monchly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly July 2010 Monthly August 2010 Q32010 Q32010 Montidy J\{ontbly 042010 Q4lO10 2010 2010 Moochly
Class) GWCL GWDP Salllple Date RII.~uJt $amplaDate ReAull Sample Date Result Sample Date ReSUlt ample Oat Monchly Result Sample Dafe Montbly Result Sample Date Result Samj)le I>ate Rmtit SlImpleDate Result Monthly Result SalllJlle Date
RequlreclQllal1edy Sampling Wen,
MW-ll Manganese (ug/L) 131.29 2/10110 134 4/28/10 137 5/24/10 122 6/16/10 99 7120110 123 8/25110 138 9/8/10 128 10/20110 141 11111/10 133 12115110 158
(Class II) Tetmhydrofuran (ug/L) 11 .5 2/10/10 12 4/28/10 5.2 5/24/10 <1.0 6/16/10 <1.0 7127110 2.17 8/25110 <1.0 9/8/10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
MW-14 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 2/2/10 6.45 (Class JIll 4/2111 0 6.29 5/21110 6.36 6/16/10 6.45 7120110 7.19 8/25/10 6.48 9/8/10 6.51 10/20110 6.60 11/10/10 6.37 12115110 6.47
MW-25 (Class Field pH (S.u.) 6.5 - 8.5 6.53 7.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.58 NS NA 11110/10 6.36 NS NA
III) 2126/2010 4/28/2010 9/812010
Uranium 6.5 5.93 6.43 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.57 NS NA 5.89 NS NA
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.62 1.3 2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.4 (mg/l)
Uranium (uglL) 41.8 58.7 66.7 37.4 36.6 34.4 71.8 72.7 37.5 30.4 29.6
Chloroform (ugIL) 70 700 1700 800 940 900 2800 2100 1000 1900 1400
Chloride Cmg/L) 58.31 72 57 80 47 52 49 64 52 48 52
MW-26 Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 - 8.5 212110 6.59 4/22/10 7.18 5/21/10 6.36 6116110 6.98 7121110 6.45 8116/10 6.39 9/26110 6.60 10120110 6.61 11115110 6.49 12/15110 6.45
(Class III) Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride) 5 1 9.9 NR 2.2 12 24 45 5.5 16 1.2
(ugIL)
TDS (mg/L) 3284.19 3100 3280 NS NS NS NS 3440 NS 3140 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 4.69 2.4 0.6 NS NS NS NS 2.5 NS 6.4 NS U (pCilL)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.5 16.1 15.8 17 15.3 7121110 16 8124110 16 15 15 15 16 (mg/L) MW-30 Chloride (mgIL) 128 2/9/10 127 4/27/10 97 5121110 NS 6/15110 NS NS NS NS NS 9/14/10 III 10119110 NS 11/9110 126 12114110 NS (Class II) FieldllH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 6.81 6.55 6.62 7.47 712112010 6.82 8124110 6.73 6.80 6.77 6.75 6.65
Selenium (ug/l) 34 32 35.3 NS NS 7/27/10 33.5 8124/10 35.6 32.6 32.4 32.2 30.5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5 21.7 22.5 5/21/10 23 6/15/10 21.1 7/21110 20 8124110 22 21 10/19110 20 20 20 (mg/L)
MW-31 TDS (JIlg/I~) 1320 1150 1220 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 1330 NS NA 1320 NS
(Class IJI) Chloride Cmg/L) 143 2/9/10 128 4/20/10 128 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/13/10 139 NS NA 11/9110 138 12/14/10 NS
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.96 7.38 5121110 6.95 6115/10 7.01 7121110 7.8 8124/10 7.1 7.66 10/19/10 6.92 6.98 6.95
Sulfate (mg/L) 532 507 522 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 527 NS NA 539 NS
Manganese (ugIL) 200 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 698 I NS NA
MW-35 Thallium (ugll) 0.5 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 1.14 J NS NA
(Class II) Gross Alpha minus Rn & 11/30/10
U (PCilL) 3.75 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 2.6 NS NA
Uranium (uglL) 7.5 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 27.2 1 NS NA
Required Semi·Annual Sampling Wells
MW-2 (Class Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.2 NS NA 1.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3.5 NS NA Ill) U (pCi/L)
MW-3 (Class Selenium Cug/l) 37 NS NA 37.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 35.5 NS NA 38.8 NS NA
ill) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 NS NA 5/3110 6.14(6.25) NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9120/10 6.39 NS NA 11119/10 6.35 NS NA
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.68 NS NA 0.71 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 0.63 NS NA 0.77 NS NA
MW-3A Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.23 (6.24) NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.42 NS NA 6.21 NS NA
(Class 1II) Sulfate (mglL) 3640 NS NA 5/4/10 3680 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/21110 3630 NS NA 11122110 3850 NS NA
TDS (mg/L) 5805 NS NA 5860 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 5470 NS NA 5330 NS NA
Selenium (uglL) 89 NS NA 81.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NS NA 94.8 NS NA
MW-5 (Class Uranium (ugIL) 7.5 NS NA 4/26/10 0.39 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 11111110 11.6 NS NA II)
MW-12 Field pH (S.D.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 4127/10 7.16 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.62 NS NA 11/19/10 6.47 NS NA
(Class III) Selenium (uglL) 25 NS NA 25.7 NS 9/20/10 NS 27.6 NS NA NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 31.9 NA
Thallium (ugll) 1.95 NS NA 3.73 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3.64 NS NA 3.57 NS NA
MW-18 Sulfate (mgIL) 1938.9 NS NA 1950 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 1930 NS NA 1910 NS NA (Class III) 5/4110 9115/10 11118110
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 NS NA 6.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 7.23 NS NA 6.37 NS NA
TDS (mg/L) 3198.77 NS NA 3280 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3190 NS NA 3030 NS NA
Ql201.0 Results
Monitoring Constituent Exceeding GWCLin QI ample Well (Wafer Curftnl
Class) GWCL GWD]J Date
MW-19
(Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5 NS
MW-23 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS (Class III)
MW-24 Cadmium (ugll) 2.5 NS
(Class III) Thallium (uglL) I NS
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 NS
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5.6 NS (mglL)
Chloride (mg!L) 38 NS MW-27 Sulfate (mglL) 462 NS (Class III) Field pH (S.D.) 6.5-8.5 NS
TDS (mgIL) 1075 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 2 NS U (pCiIL)
MW-28 Chloride (mglU 105 NS
(Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.1-8.5 NS
MW-29 Iron (ugll) 1869 NS
(Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.46 -8.5 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.33 NS MW-32 U (pCi/L)
(Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5 NS
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from February 15,2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
QI Result
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Values in 0 parentheses are the field pH measurements for the resampled analyses.
Q2 2010 Results
Q2Sampit May Monthly May Monthly June Monthly .June Monthly July Monthly .July Monthly Q2Resuit Date Sample Datt Result Sample Date Re.~ult Sample Date Resull
Required Semi·Annual SampUllg Wtlis CODtillued
5/4110 6.61 (6.66) NS NA NS NA NS NA
4122110 6.1ll NS NA NS NA NS NA
4.28 NS NA NS NA NS NA
5/6110 1.3 NS NA NS NA NS NA
5.9/ (5.78) NS NA NS NA NS NA
5.ll NS NA NS NA NS NA
42 NS NA NS NA NS NA
469 NS NA NS NA NS NA 5/3110 6.78 NS NA NS NA NS NA
1160 NS NA NS NA NS NA
1.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4/19/10 1011 NS NA NS NA NS NA
5.67 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4127/10 1630 NS NA NS NA NS NA
6.82 NS NA NS NA NS NA
5.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA
4/20110
6.03 NS NA NS NA NS NA
I The revised permit dated February 15,2011 was received after the Exceedance Notice for was submitted on February 14, 2011. It is reported as an exceedance in this notice, but was not reported in Q4 2010.
Q3 2010 Rasults Q4 2010 Results
August Q3Sampie Ottober October Q4 ample December December
Monthly upt ClJRtsalt MoDthly M9uthly Q4Result MOnthly Monthly
Sample Date Monthly Result Date ample Date Result Date Sample Date Rcsull
NS NA 9115/10 6.93 NS NA 11118110 6.8 NS NA
NS NA 9114110 7.05 NS NA 11/22110 6.44 NS NA
NS NA 5.06 NS NA 3.22 NS NA
NS NA 9/21110 1.57 NS NA III I 711 0 1.09 NS NA
NS NA 6.64 NS NA 6.1 NS NA
NS NA 5.9 NS NA 5.7 NS NA
NS NA 42 NS NA 45 NS NA
NS NA 461 NS NA 452 NS NA 9/14110 11/12/10 NS NA 7.68 NS NA 6.89 NS NA
NS NA 1060 NS NA 1110 NS NA
NS NA NA NS NA 2.4 NS NA
NS NA 9/14110 106 NS NA 11112110 107 NS NA
NS NA 5.91 NS NA 5.72 NS NA
NS NA NS NA NS NA 1119/10 1490 NS NA
NS NA NS NA 6.17 NS NA
NS NA 2.9 NS NA ll.ll NS NA
9/13/10 III I 011 0
NS NA 6.33 NS NA 6.05 NS NA
a e -T bi 3 GWCLE d xcee ances or Ir £ Th' d Q oarler un er t e Iy , 2011 d h JuJ 14 2011 GWDP
Q1 2011 Results Q2 2011 Results Q3 2011 Results
GWCLin January January March 2011 May 2011 June 2011 September
Monitoring Well Constituent Exceeding July 14, 2011 2011 Q12011 Q12011 Monthly March 2011 Q22011 Q22011 Monthly May 2011 Monthly June 2011 July 2011 July 2011 Q32011 Q32011 2011 September
(Water Class) GWCL 2011 Monthly Monthly Sample Result Sample Monthly Sample Result Sample Monthly Sample Monthly Monthly Sample Monthly Result Sample Result Monthly 2011 Monthly Sample Frequency
GWDP Sample Sample Date Date Result Date Date Result Date Result Date Date Sample Date Result
Date Result
Required QuarterlySan\pJing Wells
MW-II (Class II) Manganese (ug/L) 131.29 1111111 121 2/2111 145 3115111 68 4/4/2011 148 511012011 170 6115/2011 121 151 8/312011 118 106 Quarterly
Tetrahydrofuran (l!gIlJ 7/612011 8/30/11 91712011 11.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6/2012011 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Quarterlv
MW-14 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 1111111 6.37 217111 6.22 3114111 6.76 4/412011 6.63 5110/2011 6.37 6115/2011 5.83 7/5/2011 6.4 8/312011 6.23 9/8/2011 6.50 QUalterly III) (6.41)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.44 6.66 6.79 6.7 6.1 5.77 6.29 8/312011 6.42 6.54 Quarterly MW-2S (Class III) 1111111 2/2111 3115/11 4/4/2011 511112011 6/2012011 7/6/2011 8/30/11 (6.54) 91712011
Uranium 6.5 7.02 4.77 6.8 5.56 6.72 7.06 6.74 8/3/2011 6.37 5.96 Quarterly
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.62 0.2 0.25 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.6 2.4 Quarterly (mglL)
Uranium (uglL) 41.8 32 69.3 31.8 60.2 57.4 18.5 57.1 19.0 56.1 Quarterly
Chloroform (ug/L) 70 800 730 1200 390 1900 730 300 1000 1300 Quarterly
Chloride (mgIL) 58.31 52 59 64 64 54 39 64 60 66 Qumerly
MW-26 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 6.83 6.06 6.89 6.22 6.43 6.52 6.35 8/312011 6.07 6.71 Quarterly
III) 1112111 2116111 3115/11 411/2011 5110/2011 6/20/2011 7/612011 8/30/11 (6.58) 91712011
Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride) 5 <1.0 10 14 3.1 20 7 2.4 10 7.9 Quarterly
(ugll)
TDS (mg/L) 3284.19 3100 3270 3140 3310 3140 3020 3270 3190 3200 Qumerly
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 4.69 NS 3 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.3 2.8 2.7 2.5 Quarterly U (pCilL)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.5 15 16 17 16 16 17 17 14 16 Quarterly (mgIL)
MW-30 (Class II) Chloride (mglL) 128 1110111 NS 2/1111 134 311411 1 NS 4111/2011 134 511012011 128 612012011 127 7/512011 127 8/312011 126 91712011 145 Quarterlv
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.65 6.96 7.10 6.83 6.7 5.66 6.65 6.61 6.80 Quarterly
Selenium (uglL) 34 36.2 34.7 34 44.4 38.3 38.7 32.4 39.7 32.4 Quarterly
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5 19 21 22 21 20 22 22 20 21 Quarterly (m!!lL)
MW-31 (Class TDS (mgIL) 1320 1240 1220 1250 1370 1290 1330 1280 1300 1300 Quarterly
III) Chloride (mglL) 143 1110111 NS 211111 145 3114111 NS 41112011 143 511012011 143 6120/2011 145 7/5/2011 148 81212011 148 91612011 148 Quarterly
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5·8.5 6.65 7.21 7.43 7.01 6.73 6.16 6.64 6.67 7.03 Quarterly
Sulfate (mgIL) 532 NS 538 531 503 512 540 532 537 541 Quarterly
Manganese (ugIL) 200 NS NA 248 NS NA 369 NS NA NS NA 348 267 270 Quarterly
MW-35 (Class Thallium (ug/I) 0.5 NS NA <0.50 NS NA <0.50 NS NA NS NA NS 0.52 NS Quarterly
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 2115111 61712011 7/20111 8/212011 917111 II)
U (pCiIL) 3.75 NS NA 2.6 NS NA 3.7 NS NA NS NA NS 4.5 NS Quarterly
Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA 12.7 NS NA 21.7 NS NA NS NA 24.2 18.3 22.3 Quarterly
R (\!quire dS A eml-miua IS ampl n~ .. ~ u Wcl~
MW-2 (Class III) Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.2 NS NA 1.1 NS NA 4112/2011 1.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/8/2011 0.5 NS NA Semi-Annually U (pCilL)
MW-3 (Class III) Selenium (uglL) 37 NS NA 40.5 NS NA 45.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA 46 NS NA Semi-Annually
Field pH (S:U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 2/15/11 6.09 NS NA 4/13/2011 6.46 NS NA NS NA NS NA 811012011 6.32 NS NA Semi -Annually
Fluoride (MgIL) 0.68 NS NA 0.69 NS NA 0.68 NS NA NS NA NS NA 0.96 NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-3A (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.05 NS NA 6.58 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.19 NS NA Semi-Annually
Sulfate (mg/L) 3640 NS NA 3730 NS NA 3350 NS NA NS NA NS NA 3560 NS NA Semi-Annually III) TDS (mg/L) 5805 NS NA 2116111 5770 NS 411312011 811112011 NA 5720 NS NA NS NA NS NA 5810 NS NA Semi-Annually
Selenium (ug/L) 89 NS NA 99 NS NA 85.8 NS NA NS NA NS NA 88.5 NS NA Semi -Annually
MW-5 (Class II) Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA 211411 I 29.5 NS NA 4112/2011 7.16 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/9/2011 0.5 NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-12 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 . 8.5 NS NA 2115111 6.43 NS NA 4/512011 6.67 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.13 NS NA Semi-Annually
III) Selenium (ugll) 8/9/2011 25 NS NA 39 NS NA 21.7 NS NA NS NA NS NA 25.4 NS NA Semi-Annually
Thallium (ug/I) 1.95 NS NA 3.49 NS NA 3.74 NS NA NS NA NS NA 4.0 3.39 NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-18 (Class Sulfate (mgll) 1938.9 NS NA 1770 NS NA 1780 NS NA NS NA NS NA 811012011 1910 NS NA Semi-Annuallv III) 2/15111 4/6/2011 9121111 Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 NS NA 6.27 NS NA 6.71 NS NA NS NA NS NA 5.95 NS NA Semi-Annually (6.30)
TDS (mgIL) 3198.77 NS NA 3250 NS NA 3250 NS NA NS NA NS NA 3190 NS NA Semi-Annually
Monitoring Well Constituent Exceeding GWCLin
(Water Class) GWCL Current
GWDP
MW -19 (Class
1Il) Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5
MW-23 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 III)
MW-24 (Class Cadmium (ug/L) 2.5
III) Thallium (ugIL) I
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5.6 (ml!.lL)
MW-27 (Class Chloride (mgfL) 38
Sulfate (m.l\l'l.) 462 III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5-8.5
TDS (mg/L) 1075
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 2 U (oCi/L)
MW-28 (Class Chloride (mgIL) 105
III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.1 -8.5
MW-29 (Class Iron (ug/L) 1869
III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.46 -8.5
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.33 MW-32 (Class U (pCi/L)
III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from July 14,2011 version ofGWOP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
January January
2011 2011
Monthly Monthly
Sample Sample
Date Result
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
Values in 0 parentheses are the field pH measurements for the resampled analyses.
Ql 2011 Results
March 2011 Q120ll Q12011 Monthly March 2011
Sample Result Sample Monthly
Date Result Date
212112011 6.78 NS NA
2/9/2011 6.13 NS NA
2.78 NS NA
2/10/2011 1.42 NS NA
5.73 NS NA
6 NS NA
46 NS NA
455 NS NA 2/9/2011 6.71 NS NA
1090 NS NA
0.7 NS NA
2114/2011 114 NS NA
5.69 NS NA
NS NA NS NA
NS NA NS NA
1.5 NS NA
2/912011
5.99 NS NA
Q2 2011 Results Q3 2011 Results
May 2011 June 2011 September Q220ll Q220ll Monthly May 2011 Monthly June 2011 July 2011 July 2011 Q32011 Q32011 2011 September
Sample Result Sample Monthly Sample Monthly Monthly Sample Monthly Result Sample Result Monthly 2011 Monthly Sample Frequency
Date Result Result Date Date Result Date Date Sample Date
Required Scmi-Annual Samplillg WeIL~. conlinued
415/2011 7.03 NS NA NS NA NS NA 7/20/3011 6.65 NS NA Semi-Annually
4/512011 7.14 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/412011 6.38 NS NA Semi-Annually
2.61 NS NA NS NA NS NA 1.46 NS NA SemI-Annually
41512011 1.07 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/4/2011 NO NS NA Semi-Annunlly
6.12 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.45 NS NA Semi-Annually
6.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6 NS NA Semi-Annually
43 NS NA NS NA NS NA 43 NS NA Semi-Annually
442 NS NA NS NA NS NA 424 NS NA Semi-Annually 4/512011 6.79 NA NS NA 8/8/2011 6.39 NS NA Semi-Annually NS NA NS
1190 NS NA NS NA NS NA 1090 NS NA Semi-Annually
1.1 NS NA NS NA NS NA 0.8 NS NA Semi-Annually
109 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/8/2011 105 NS NA Semi-Annually 411112011 5.78 NS NA Semi -Anllually 6.01 NS NA NS NA NS NA
3010 NS NA NS NA NS NA 8/9/2011 1080 NS NA Semi-Annually 4/1812011 NS NA Semi-Annually 6.45 NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.20
4.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA 1.9 NS NA Semi-Annually 8/2/2011 4/112011 8/30111 6.10 6.14 NS NA NS NA NS NA (6.20) NS NA Semi-Annually
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab C1 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, July 2011
Tab C2 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, September 2011
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
Tab Fl Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring, July 2011
Tab F2 Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring, September 2011
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-lAIB
G-2AIB
G-3AIB
G-4AIB
G-5AIB
G-6AIB
G-7AIB
G-8 AlB
G-9AIB
Field Data QAJQC Evaluation
Holding Time Evaluation
Laboratory Temperature Check
Analytical Method Check
Reporting Limit Evaluation
Trip Blank Evaluation
QAlQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Radiologics Counting Error
Laboratory Matrix QC
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
PROPERTY
~ TWN-11
J J_ 10 ( /OUNDARY ~ . ~~I \~
)OJ ( '" 1\ I \ 111 II TW~-15
(:""I.. J / A...l _ '---'--IJ ./1 ~
/," MW-01 ~ I. TWN-10
~ ~ ~ TW~ MW-18 ~ II • TWN-6 PIEZ-1
~ g
r' ~_ "\.J tic ~I II
II ~5 TW~N-a MW-19
f ~~( ~~'1 ~.
" II ~ TWN-18 ~ -I( TWN.', ~ TW~3 I PI~Z-2
CELL NO.1
~
N-4
PI EZ-3
"
TWN-14
I'" J = ITW4~~W4::nJ ij ~ :J :z--I-C~~--r~====~~:;;;-~MW~.~211;;;;;;~;;~~~~IJ;~28 O~W4'20 cP0::~~
7 , .26 TW4-' 3 OTW4-12 ' 0 OTW4-
MW-02 •
a
MW-20 • TW4-19
7 -::/ 4 )I II
11
II
1 ~II
11
11
II
II
II
II 32 II
II
\1
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
I
• M~-21
II
II
II
\\
~ ~
N ~ ~ '~
l
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
perched monitoring well
o temporary perched monitoring well
PI~Z-l perched piezometer
TWN-1 ~
MW-34
-<>-
MW-36
~
temporary perched nitrate
monitoring well
perched monitoring well installed
August/September, 2010
perched monitoring well
installed April, 2011
MW-B5
-¢-I
MW-~ b MW~3 ____ MW-34 M~-
-¢--¢---J:t-•
MW-03 •
MW-20 •
MW-37
CELL NO.2
MW-17 •
33
OTW4-1EbTW4-11 OTW4-13
TW4-7$i-a
OTW4-1
OTW4-40TW4_14
TW4-23 OTW4-6 o
OTW4-26
PIEZ-4 ~.::=:-=--==~~-==
g ./
d'
PIEZ-5
"
T37S
T38S
./ .;::'
., ..............
~ ~ ~ ~--",----=---~ --"-h""===== 4_==__ Ii ~~~ --~~~~--# --~7/
3000
wildlife pond
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC. APPROVED
SJS
MW-22 • II
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
SITE PLAN
AND PERCHED WELL LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE REFERENCE
H :/718000/nov11 Iwelloc11.srf
~
~
FIGURE
A-1
)
~
.,
TabB
Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring quality Assuran~e Plan (QAP)
OENISO,})~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '3,./11 Q\.ACA.(f~r GrounJl W",,-=t'~r ;:J.O 11
Sampler Name
and initials: ~ntl~,... He 1 ),'J,,~ /f H Location (well name):I'-_M_w_-_;t _________ ---'
Date and Time for Purgingj ~/ ~I a..O J ) and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: []I] pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) o~o
Sampling Event I QlAo.rh:I"G (,.-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event LI_M_W_-2_8 ____ --.1
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D
Specific ConductanceLI _~....:...~.:....4..L.-__ ---.JI/-tMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purginm I Oq. 'll)
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 ! L\.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): ! \.?JS .go
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 \~.3q 1(·653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) L.....--=-_----I
Co.70
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \6 -S~ I Redox Potential (Eh)! 37::J... TurbiditylL..=o __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)! ~o
Time 1l3~ I Gal. Purged I 2.Y. ~ I Time 113.?6 I Gal. Purged 1;2.5_17 I
Conductance 1 'J..~9 ':> I pH If,·bb I Conductance 1 2~::tJ I pH I b .b~ I
Temp. DC IIG.98 I Temp. DC I1 h ·5) I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1'371:. I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '375 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 J
Time I 13;2.7 I Gal. Purged I ?:S.36 I Time Il;3.9.,g I Gal. Purged I 25 ,b is I
Conductance 1:2.5'1 15 I pH 110 .'";[5 I Conductance 1;;2..5~g I pH Ib.7J I
Temp. DC II b.qq I Temp.oC I I G.bl I
Redox PotentialEh (mV) 1370 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 13b& I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I D I
White Mesa Mill
"Field Data Worksheet for Groundwate"r 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I :2~ .DY
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . / . .)1
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 113.iQ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-_tJ_I_I.\ _______ ...J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha BI 0 1,000 ml ijJ 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Arr'.vc?J. on s,;+<. 0..+ )/d-I. lo...t"l(lGr CN"\~ &o.(r;n f're.s~(\-t ~r pv...("~e tAnJ. 5C."'pJ;.:j -t.J~t1t.
p",(~" be~~ 6\~ 1130. PIA("~c~ \,.)ell .tor", }cJp\1 of' 12D M;t1lA+cS. Wc.}(',-Was C.)-e~y
+hro"':f 0lAf +he.. pv.r~c. Pv..r~~ e,.~c:J. ~"A .so..mp\.:: \.0C1.S ~oll('{.t('~ ~J' )336. D~p}~
d-o ~o-.hr d>vf}."r' p~M·~(' ~G..:' \I~. S \.. L.en S~}(. "'.} 133b.
'-________ ...Jloo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Me.~a Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 6f2
Mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. E
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONr:JJ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
:J See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13,6\ Qv.u..rter (,-rO\A"c! w~+~(' ~() II
Sampler Name
Location (well name):L-I_fV._w_ • .-,;.3:.....-________ --I and initials: I ~"MI" Noll,' ~ '\j /I H
Date and Time for PUl·gingj,--=~;,,;,./..;..;J D:;..;,/_::2._o.-,;" ____ .....J
Well Purging Equip Used: [][]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I Q",(}..rt<ri::1 Cry.)
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _9,;,...~:....;' ___ --'If.tMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ ~.;)..3
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I f\II W -3 A
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 ~7.o0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well:~(.653h)
3" Well:~(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh) 11.-__ ----1 TurbiditYI-I ___ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)1 :;'0'"
Time IOGl 4.5 I Gal. Purged 1l1 . 98' . I Time 1 c>~Yc. I Gal. Purged 11 0 1 ~1 I
!D.LI'
Conductance I sg~8 I pH 1 b ·3& I I Sg'3~ )0 ·'3 I Conductance I pH 1 (,3l.{
Temp.oC I I~.bg I Temp.oC 1 15 .77 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I LQ..7 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I L.j~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I u I
Time IOql-\l I Gal. Purged 1 ! c) '4 i) • I Time I Oq~8 I G 1 Pu d 11(1 ! n a . rge I ., , '<0 ,J • I
10.gs Il.Ob
Conductance l .sg3i1 I pH 1 b ·3.3 I Conductance ISB.2t:f I pHI "3a I
Temp.oC I IS .[g I Temp.oC I If) .80 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I Y 1$ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 407 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I' i o;.~ ,
I' .50
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1-1 _. :2._1--'7 __ ---'
gallan(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I Y{,.61 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-.:....M-,-¥A:":""-______ -1
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100m! 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals DI 0 250m! lB 0 RN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m! 0 0 RN03 0
Other (specify) [] 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Fl o",r i J "( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
~ See instruction
A{,(:\le~ on !,i1( 6..+ o8o"_"~I\r'lt:r /Ji11" G-lA.r";(I y(t"..st.r1T-.for plA~-C: 4t1~ ~~Mpl ;0 evC!,.,f. Ptll~~ .bzjtt1J
,,1-ogS7. ?\A"~cJ. vlc.1\ far c.-.-tor&!1 of 53 1"'11'(\~t~. ~~~((' w~ G1t:r.,. .... +hfOv.+ov....-t t"-.c l\.A"j~
f u.('~-t. -ChcAt~ "'''~ ~ft.tfl P \0 \.o:l~(~ (.o"edc~ li\.+ oq!)O. De~'h 10 wv..-h/ ~C!" F?Jt.
y.)O-~ '67.11 Lc:..A-si-tc. c;...~ O%b.
L....-________ -JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksh-eet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
III
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I ATTACHMENT! OENISOt!)~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Attachment 1
I See instruction
---
Description of Sampling Event: I 3 rdi Q\I\t\rT<:.r GOrO\Af\J W,,+u· ;2.011
Location (well name): .... 1 _M_W_-_'3_A _________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: I-y;,."n-e r t}o II:J~/TH-
Date and Time for Purgin~I-_~J_'_O.:..../~_()_II ____ _' and Sampling (if different) .... 1 g...,;./_'_II._a_o_,_, ____ -....I
Well Purging Equip Used: [][I pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I G~Q..f+.vB &w ! MW -1.8
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_______ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 l1.0
Specific Conductance 1~_l1:....:q-,j ___ ....I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): IL......-.::qs=-:._O_O __ -J
Depth to Water Before Purgind $5.37 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:! b,:;z.g !(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '----_ .....
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 17. o~ Redox Potential (Eh)1-1 Y...:;5;;;.;g~_-J Turbid ity ,-I ..,;:;,O __ ---..J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 19 b
Time IDgSO I Gal. Purged I ~. ~ I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I blg9 I pHI b .19 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC 1 17.D4 I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '-\5~ 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged .... 1 q_ . .;.....3 _k> ___ ---' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 . :log
Time to evacuate two cas ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I ~.L{" I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 1.'45
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 '1 .36
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ .... ....;;.,v.-.!.VA.!....-______ -,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 iii
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) rn 0 Sample volume 0 ijJ 0
SvJ-to-+< If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
JD~ Preservative:
Comment
[: See instruction
Aff'ivd. on Si+~ ~+ ogl>~. -rtA-nl'let' ~bll:J~ MA G-c.rr"(\ pf'e5.c:n-t -h>r ~u.~e.. IIlllrA 5,o.lV1fl i ~ e\)~n+'
'Pv.I"~e be~o..1\ 1>.1-OKlO. f~I"~~ lo.)-ell ~(" .... +ot-cd or 45 l'trw.fes. fu.("~~ \.)01/ d~. """'+t'f' Wt;;1 cJ<~,..
+),('O~~hO""'+ f~~(.. Pw~"< efltle~ 6..+ 08~, L-c~~ S;-\( o-i o'tSb,
ArfllJtP. 01'1 ~:+e + O'1~-' l ' t I + 1 ' I I L q., .Jo(.. "'-;'1\I'\Gt' ~(l0\ &6..rr·Y'\ prc5.cFI 70 t:Dlle(. S~rv1p~. DCJ~T"I III W~-r~r
~""'plc:..s. \...:)<tfc. {,()Iled-e~ ",-1-0135. Left-site o.t 0-,1..\ ~
"--________ -JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
1511
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
J)ENISOn~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL I ~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1'3"~ Q~o..;tU' &f'ou.I\J wlII.fc(" ;2.011
Location (well name): .... 1 _M.-,-w_-5-'--_________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: f1!-ntlu Holl '~I1~/-r/t
Date and Time for PurgingJ'-~....;J_'l_1 fJ._O_lJ ____ --I and Sampling (if different) ,-I N=:,../.:..:..A ______ -l
Well Purging Equip Used: [!!Jpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... I_Q--'-~_O ____ ___
Sampling Event I Q'-'(l.rful~ &~ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... I_M_'W_-:L_'f _____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 '1.0
Specific ConductanceL-I_~..:....~:....~ ___ ___II!lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ ,0 b. \ 0
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 9·0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 113g .SO
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ;2.1.15 1(.653h)
3" Well:l-. ....:::.O __ --J. (.367h)
pH of Water (avg) '-1....;..1-"~~'_=_ _____ .....
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \5. ql Redox Potential (Eh)lI-...;...14_' __ -l Turbidity 1 J 0.0
Weather Condo
Time II lOt> I
Conductance 1 ~81S'"
Temp. DC 115. g'1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1
Time 1110:;2.. 1
Conductance 1 :2.. ~O k:.
Temp. DC I IS·Q3
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1
Turbidity (NTU) I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Gal. Purged I ti~.31 I
I pH 1 7.~q I
1
lCJ9 1
15 ., 1
Gal. Purged 1 l.) '6. "1 '-l 1
1 pH 17-29 1
1
191 1
10.1 1
Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 )~6
Time 0..;..111_0_' __ ..... Gal. Purged I ~~.53
Conductance
Temp. DC
l .2.q()~
I t5.en
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1-1 I;....:Y'-:l __ --'
Turbidity (NTU) 11°·0 1
Time L....:11_1.-..;;03 __ ..... Gal. Purged I y;?,. q6
Conductance 11-2_2f..:.....o....;I_--J pH 17.Z<\
Temp. DC 115.'1 )
Redox Potential Eh (mV) II-);"":Y_V __ ....J
Turbidity (NTU) I 10 ./
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 _L\..:..:3"-._~ ___ ..... gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 • ')..17 T = 2V IQ = 1 1'\ 4. '14 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L.._rJ_/..;..At--______ -J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 rnl 0 0 H2SO4 0
Hea vy Metals 'IE 0 250 rnl m 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rnl 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
ArrioJed. en sii-~ At D1\.'~. 1"11,(11'181" O\(\~ &",rr:f) ?fe.s~fIf-+0(' FW~~ 0111'-\ SC4.Mfr:J ~\len+' PW5~ ~0If'\
Q-..t 0,\,.15. ?"'r~('cl U)~1i fOf 0-. +0+,,1 of ~oo t'Vlirl(f.'h:s. Wtt..+t(' Wr.J /I'Ios.t~ c.JeQf'" +~"'d"'~hOV\j-
flAf~-<'. P~r()e. c.r'J~etX o.,,~ .)o..l"I'lpk ~tAS t..ollec1etA tAJ 1105. D~p+h +0 w~+-{r ~+h(" P"'(~<
Wlk~ )g.Y·Y() Left si1( ",1 1107,
L-________ ...... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Dafa Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of;
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I ATTACHMENT 1 ~ OENISOJ)~ ~ I WHITE MESA URANruM MILL
Attachment 1
[-See instruction
MINES ,FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 3 r~ Q"'<Aif~r &iOlA(\J\ W0I.4cr ;tO il
Location (well name): ..... 1 ....;..M_W_-_l_I _________ --I
Sampler Name
and initials: tt;flne r tJo/l,J~Ji~
Date and Time for Purgin~, ...... 8_/_3....;./_~_O_I_I ____ __' and Sampling (if different) Al/A '--~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 I 7· 0 '---------'
Specific Conductance ..... l_q_~....;..~ ___ ___'I!!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj gK '15
Conductance (avg) 1-1 .:;..:;L...;,,9...:....Y--'--'-1 ____ ---I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ..... 1 _Q_E_D ____ __'
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... 1 M_W_-_3_5 ____ ----J
pH Buffer 4.0 L\.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \30.00
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~(.653h)
3" Well:~(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) 1-1 ..;,,7_.~_' _____ .....
Well Water Temp. (avg) I IS.57 Redox Potential (Eh)I-II....;,I.;",.3 __ ..... Turbidity I J". g,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp .• ( (prior sampling event)1 17D
Time I \O;LO I Gal. Purged 1 $3. \f> I Time I lo;lJ I Gal. Purged I .53.'3g I
Conductance l ;t..j S\ I pH l i.2g I Conductance l;Ltly:J.. I pH 1,.2b I
Temp. DC I \15.54 I Temp. DC I 1S . .sg 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I \'~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 113 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 lb.l 1 Turbidity (NTU) I \b·5 I
Time l)oXL I Gal. Purged I S'3>. S9 I Time 110.;2.J 1 Gal. Purged 1 S 3· f, , 1
Conductance 1 ;2..&\50 1 pH I7.% 1 Conductance 1 ~qY5 I pH 17.25 1
Temp. DC I lS .$S 1 Temp. DC 1 IS.SG{ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 113 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 1 1~ 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 1l:.'3 1 Turbidity (NTU) I lb.\ 1
White Mesa Mill -Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPj
Volume of Water Purged I 5L\.?-S
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-.1,_;l_17 __ ----'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two easing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = P;Yl.05 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,A WA L I Se.t or -V OGS
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 rnl
Nutrients 119 0 100 rnl
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250m!
All Other Non Radiologies ~ 0 250ml
Gross Alpha ID 0 1,000 rnl
Other (specify) 'IE 0 Sample volume
G-d'~("o-' Inof".jO\r'\" G~
Comment
Y N
0 ~
0 ~
'fJ 0
0 ~
'fl 0
0 ~
Added Type y
HCL 111
H2SO4 []
HN03 -£J
NoPreserv. 0
HN03 "1J
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Ir -, See instruction
'Yi
Arrive?A on ~i4-e ~-t Ob\O.-rM~r (}."A &(A{(:'" pr~Jt:,,-t for pIA'S a.(I~ SIAMpJ;3 e\lel1t.
Fu.r~c. bej"'A ,,+ oblS . Pv..r~ea \j.)ell .for" fA.. +ott..\ of .lSO M:n",+c..5.
vJc...+a ~~ c.I-e.o.r +hrOv,~hOu.t-the, pv.('~e . Pur~e endeJ M~ .5Cft?1p)(,s ~cr( C61le~J
d\t 10:25 . D ep1-h 10 vsod-'Gr v--B-~r pv.(Jc v!)ct~ 84,0 J
left-~i+-c 0.+ l03.b
L...-_______ -....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
fil
0
tJ
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONf)~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL I ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
[~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13r d\ G v..a.rft-r Grou..r.i( \I5~+C .... ;2.011
Location (well name):I-1 _M_\f\)_-_l~ _________ ----,
Sampler Name
and initials: 4'""tH1U H .,IJ,J~ /,u
Date and Time for PurgindL-~_/ l._!:J.J:)_'_I ____ -' and Sampling (if different) ,-I g~J:.....".u/....:..~--......;..I _l ___ --'
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I Qv..().('h.(~ GOw I Mw-~ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-_______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductancel'---q_'l_q ___ -'hlMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1130.L IO
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ log .50 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 14.30 1(.653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) 1-.._---'
Conductance (avg) L-1_L\_I_5.5 ______ --' pH of Water (avg) 1:0.15
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 Jb.bL.\ Redox Potential (Eh) 1 3bO TurbidjtylL-_' {,_'_' _---'
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)' ~go
Time 1 153D I Gal. Purged I ~.7 g I Time , , Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I LIlES I pH' "'.13 I Conductance , I pH , I
Temp.oC I It;Jbq I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3 b C> I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I lb . 1 I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater . . 1 of
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 ;2..~.()1..j
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (0), in gpm.
S/60= I ·.:l17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I I?>uW I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 11. [5;;(
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~I-;,...ft/.~:lA~ ______ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mI 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mI 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals Li 0 250ml r& 0 HN03 [!I 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preserv ati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Af(:\lc::A 0" Site <1+ 13 '1~. "'-~MU HOI\;~"l?('e.sel1t ~o(' ?v-r~ c:. 41l~ ~Cl"'p);fI~ -e\)~fJ+.
'P\A.(Il..G bCII.."If\ &>-.1-13\.\5. IH J()f WI ' n '-
\.J ...) -) ""f\"" l-~ '1 lOw f(ATe. aGGrGIAs.c~ so -.::r: 1-ook '" .sc.} or
PQ..(Ct.rne-ter.s. 'F ",,('~e~ v.)e.1I .tor ~ -rat",\ o-F l~~ 1V1:()IA+e!:.., ft .. (~ed Uld) ar~'. WfAtu h~~ t-'o.. ~ l~\"i ~~~o1o(. r W"~~ cr\tk~ "J IS '45. Le~ 6,:+( ~} \~'-\7.
A((·;\Je6. On ~i+(" ~;tc: .... + ol~"'.l" .... "nec ~n6.. &/HI":t\ pres.er'lt·h c:.olle.d-.sp,mp}e~. Depth -h w~tcr
o,,!ll'/l.~ 113.0\ S"'~plt'.s we« c.ol)~dc:c:l4.f 0735. L'C!'+t-,5;+c..,l 0737.
'--________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill _
Field Data WorKsheet for Groundwater 2 ~f2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1
[-J See instruction I I ATTACHMENT 1 OENISOn.J. .J.I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: j3 i"Di Q""o...({.er G.,...ou,l"la Gjo.:te r :Xo) /
Location (well name):1-1 ...;,M_W_-.-,;l.-,;'-i _________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;.""er HolI;J~~/TI-l
Date and Time for PlIrgingJL-.g....;7....;3.;;..;/;....;;~_O_'I ____ __' and Sampling (if different) ..... 1.M_v,_'A ______ --'
Well Purging Equip Used:llJ Ipump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event IO u '" ('f~ r lj 6-v.) 1
M \JJ-;Lb Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-_______ ----J
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific ConductanceI-I ....:.q....:.q....:.~ ___ ---II/!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \;2...8-70
Depth to Water Before Purgind \ 04 _oy Casing Volume (V) 4" well:I I{;.IO 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
'-------'
Conductance (avg) 1-1 =...2:=-q:....;7:.,:3:::....-____ ----I pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I L.ol Redox Potential (Eh) 1 ..... {)_"'_;5 __ --' TurbiditylL...° ___ __'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling eventll.,?5°
Time I J53D I Gal. Purged 13 L % I Time 113:3' I Gal. Purged 131. {,8' I
Conductance 1 '30~) I pH 1 b.;?,1 1 Conductance 13001 I pH Ib.;A 1
Temp.oC 1 Ik.53 1 Temp.oC 1 15 .Qg I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 9...19 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) 12 (,4 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 Q I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time 1 13:130 I Gal. Purged 1 31. iSS I Time 1 \333 I Gal. Purged 1 3~ ./ ) I
Conductance 1 1.~1~ 1 pH 1 G.ll 1 Conductance 12.1l.J& I pH 1 ~ . .?3 1
Temp.oC 115 .&7 I Temp.oC 1 \5.13 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ;;tbJ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) IgSC1 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 Q I
WtJite Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 Cif 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 S~.SS gallan(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = 1..-1 _. :;).._17-'--_---'
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1143.41 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabiA ~ A L I ~ d' or "OG.s
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs W 0 3x40 mI 0 ~ HCL "El 0
Nutrients 1iJ 0 lOOmI 0 ~ H2SO4 is 0
Heavy Metals m 0 250mI ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics IE 0 250mI 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha m 0 1,000 mI 1] 0 HN03 'E 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 E 0 ~
GC'flt.'ro..\ Tnorj~f\;C~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
I: J See instruction
L-_______ ---'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I OENISONI)~ ~ I ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13 r dl Qv..o..rttr &rou.n '" \.O",t~(" ;J...O II R~.s"'lY\flc,
Location (well name ):1-1 --..,;.M--.,;W_-......;l....,:l.\ ________ ---I
Sampler Name r-=.-----n--n""-+' ---,-.-.,.--__ -,
and initials: tr;nne( Ho1J.J(J..Y/17-1
Date and Time for PUI'gin~ g/307~~ I
Well Purging Equip Used: [ID pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event IQv..~f+;1' b &Q
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance ...... 1 _'1_~4 ___ ----,1 ""MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 10'3 · gPl
Conductance (avg) YDCS
and Sampling (if different) ...... 1,./,_'/_"' ______ --'
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ...... 1 G_fE._p ____ ----'
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_M_W_-:&5 _____ ---'
pH Buffer 4.0 L4 .0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 1.zz.70
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 \ ".~q 1(·653h)
3" Well: ....... _O __ ......1.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1~ . .5£" Redox Potential (Eh)IL-~_4S __ ---, Turbidity ...... l_o __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC {prior sampling event)1 "46
Time I l~S I Gal. Purged I ~ ss I Time I '~~C::. I Gal. Purged 1 3~.1' I
Conductance I '-\0 bc:' I pHI b.Y\ I Conductance I L\Ob~ I pH I t;;.y } I
Temp.oC I ~S.b~ I Temp.oC I \S.b~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) l:LOq't I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I2..YL.. I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I (:) I
Time I l~:t"'" I Gal. Purged I 3?-..9 ~ I Time 1132-<6 I Gal. Purged I 'X!>.2..0 I
Conductance I gObY I pH I b,ql I Conductance I YbbS I pH I b.LJ I I
Temp.oC I P; •. :sq I Temp.oC I \S.Y D I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~Q q I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~I....l q I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I D I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwatei 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 33. b3
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate CQ) in gpm.
S/60 = I ,;2..11
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I \tjQ .13 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L.._~_/''-'~'--______ '"''
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 rnl 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals m 0 250 rnl S 0 HN03 '29 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha lSl 0 1,000 rnl !l 0 HN03 lJ 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
r:; See instruction
Ar(;~eA on ..5.~i-c: 0..1 ,O'b,;2.. T~nl'\~r MtA CrtA((;f\ ?t"d<!"t1t -tbr r'\A~c. o..fI~ !''''rtlp];5 e~el1T.
P\A.~~ ~O'-" 6\.+ l()~. f\ .... (8CCX Well ~or ().. +o-t~l 0+ lSS M:flV.·h:~. ~fI..+t:(' ~~ deo.'
+\roU~holJ-1-?v.(~r P\Ar~c. cl1J-t.a Ikf\~ -S(At'FJplt0 were l:.o I1 Gt.+~J ~+ 133D. L~.r.} 5;+~
,,J-\33S. O~+~ to Wo..tc(' c·StCf" f\Ar~~f IND.~ IOy.~,
L..-________ ..... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 6f2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
I OENISON'lJ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 r-See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ~((): Qv..().(+u (,rou,f\q., WCA.:rU" .a...O II
Location (well name ):I~t'I...:...;w""--..J.I.w.S _________ ---,
Sampler Name
and initials: I -r;.nn~r ~oIFJ ~~frJ.l
Date and Time for PurgingJL.,j8ou/"-I.I~Q.L./P..o_.:..:.1 ) ____ -J and Sampling (if different) L-:I N.~'/..r:.A ______ -I
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event IQW}.ct cd!1 {,..\V
pH Buffer 7.0 1·Q
Specific ConductanceL-1 ....,J1 ...... 9-1-1 ___ --'IIlMHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 7D.::ZS
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I '-_M_v.:l_-_3_7 ____ -I
pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 13lj.OD
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 41.,~ 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. --=0'---_--'. (.367h)
5.t1.5
Well Water Temp. (avg) I Ib,3~ Redox Potential (Eh)IL-3_1l __ --' TurbiditYL-1 --=0 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 18b
Time I ILl IS I Gal. Purged I 8.1 t...u,
g3.S4
. I Time I )I-I It, I Gal. Purged I L\;). b 7 .
8 3 .7E; I
Conductance I :)5~1 I pH I 'S.'"1£> I Conductance 1 3S7~ I pH I S.CC5 I
Temp.oC I I ". ::S:X: 1 Temp.oC I H;.3S 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I "'!>?-7 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '3 01 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time 11417 1 Gal. Purged 1 g:;; ~9 . I «3.Q1
Time I ,g I~ I Gal. Purged l Ie') ,I I 84 .1~
Conductance I 3500 I pH I S·qs I Conductance 1 ~5J:Z 1 pH I 5.'IS I
Temp.oC I I b .:tK I Temp.oC I lh.'35 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I Jo~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '3 0A I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I gq. 63
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I ,~n
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casi ng volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I :)33· ", I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ ..... I"._:l._;tl _______ -,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 rnl 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250 rnl ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rnl 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 151 0 Sample volume D ~ D
S\A\-rO\+, If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
TDS Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A(f';\le~ on Si+c A.t O/L'I'-\.-r-Mn<r" MiA (r1A((,'f\ preJ(.(I+ -h;( f\A('~(, #on). .5(.ttv1pJ,~ elJe",t.
?v.I'~"-b~~.., "" 0750. P",("c3-<o' Well fo(" ().., +ot&l.\ of 390 M;f1l)t~5. W~t"( ~
L le",..-+i, (0 i 0 "'\ 1t.< 'PlAr ~ e ' ? '" ~9"C. enA "cl. "" ~ 50,.,? k~ t.0<"-CO iht-cq
~J lY;LO. O-epth +0 \,JfA.·h.r <1!.Jl.<.r plA7)e. wa.s 71.05
L~U ~ir<. ~1 IY3 0
'-________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Wo'rksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 IOENISOJ) JI MIN ES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER --
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 13 f IJ\ G v..o./"h.( 0-(00..4 \No . .1.u ~OIl RC.~a.rv1pJ.c
Location (well name ):1-1 .....;....M.;,.::W:..=.....--....:..I ~!:::..-________ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: I=f,." J'\t( Roll ;J'\.'1/T/t
Date and Time for Purginm q I~ll ;l.O I \ and Sampling (if different) o.........;;N~/ It~ _____ .......
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJ pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I Qv..o...A<fI~ (,-'yJ I N'/A Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-_______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductancel'----'-q~....;...1"'__ __ _JI!-tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 113Y . 00
Depth to Water Before Purgind 70 .2,S Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 g I. b~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L---=--_-J
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \f>.~~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 Y 15 Turbidity ,-I ....;;.0 __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)l-lJ_"_o_ .......
Time IIY ss I GaL. Purged I 33 .~ I Time I JY~ I Gal. Purged 1&3,7 b. I
Conductance 1 3'10~ I pH 16:3LJ I Conductance 13'-):2.D I pHI b.3j I
Temp. DC I 18 .~b I Temp. DC I 18 ·8S I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ::td--I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 'Y I 7 I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) 10 I
Time I IY57 I Gal. Purged I ~3.~ I Time 11l.J.$g I Gal. Purged I ~ y -11 I
Conductance I "jY3~ I pH I C.'31 I Conductance 1 3Y~~ I pH I G.:JD I
Temp. DC I IB.Eo I Temp. DC I )g,So I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I CII'l: I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I q D 5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 %)9.l>3
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = 1'----,2_1..;...7 __ .....J
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 13B3 'b7 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,-_...v.......;....;VA'-'--_____ ----J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ~ 0 RN03 M 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Arri\Jca. 01\ .srt"C. 0..1-af$~L\. --'-:"l'I1!.r ~f\t.L G-o-U\(\ Y'l"t:.S.Gtlf -k .... fv.r<:1~ Ci\.t7J ~~pIJ~ e\Jet)7:
P\A("~~ bG5011'1 ""r 0 ({30. ?""r~~ct well for " 1-0+1\1 of 3~O 1YI'lrH.,Jes. tJo:tc·("
~a..s c.\c"-r +hrov.~hou-.+ +~e. pur~e . '?u/~t!: l!YJdeJ. ~l'1cA .se.Yl'Jplc.J L.)~re (6)l~c.*=4
do'\-' 1500. Depth +<> wc...t<::r '" f+t"r" pv-r~c w".,) 7}. J}
L.e.\t ~;+( 0.1 15 O~
'--________ -IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field D'ata Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ)~~I ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL r See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description-of Sampling Event: I;:~{a GWA;=t=e.( &ro\}\r.J\ \No...'t.er ~H N:,.rlAt" ':t'n lJ~f~~:f;ol\
Location (well name):1...1 _M_w_-_1....:.1 ________ --l
Sampler Name .
and initials: I-ro:.noe(' ~o lI );J ~m
Date and Time for Purgi n~ -, /1,\ / ~o \ 1 and Sampling (if different) '/f}j)J~Dl}
Well Purging Equip Used:@]pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1...1 Q--,-~=--=D::"-___ --I
pH Buffer 7.0 /.D
Specific Conductance ,-I _'1 ..... 1"-4..1-__ --11 !!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgind S \. S b
Conductance (avg) \ 4 0'1 ~-~-------I
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I I... _""_W_-_~_7 ____ ---I
pH Buffer 4.0 Ll .D
Well Depth(O.Olft): I \yc.t oo
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" weil:l b3. ~~ 1(·653h)
3" Well:. c.) . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) lb·l"-Redox Potential (Eh) 1 L1/7 Turbidity 1 ~. g
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 \ go
Time 1 O~SS I Gal. Purged 1 1~q . \) I Time I OS:s5b I Gal. Purged I, 2 tl. '33 I
Conductance I \qOs 1 pH I b. "S I Conductance I l~oS I pH I b. b"S I
Temp.oC I \S.lS I Temp.oC I )S. \i I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 9~b I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I YB6 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ':>. ~ I Turbidity (NTU) L 3 .'1 I
Time I 0 ~.sl I Gal. Purged II &q. sCI I Time IOSSSfS I Gal. Purged I );2.4 .7 , I
Conductance I l~os I pH I b .bS I Conductance I \l.\O\ I pH Ib.bS I
Temp.oC I ';'.) ~ I Temp.oC I 'S.'S I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '-11 ::L I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I L\,o I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~.~ I Turbidity (NTU) I ~.~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Grouridwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I \~O.?-O
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . ?-, '1
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 5~b .Y3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL.,..M...:..v,..:...;'A=---______ -I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A((i'Vf:.~ on ~j+~ 0..1' ~SO. ~n(J-e.r }tl>)\j ~2J ?('~s~"t-~(" pvrje oJ" M\0-ltt .
Pv.("~-L be~n 0..+ 2'300. PV-(~~J. ~e'l o~-e..("n ·l~h+. A+ th~ ~'h\,t Df ?V.(~e.1 thL wc.tt<r
\k),,~ (A. rt\; 1\-\ ~ ~,.e.~. \0o . .t~(" c.. \ -c,o..f e~ +h (D\J\~ I.lIJ'. +-+},"t: fv-(".~ ~, P v-,~<:: d---.....><.11 -rOI"
~oo l'VI<'flV\.tc:~. "f\. .... r~~ -e.l"\cXe~ 0-'" OC:WO. ,vo ~~pJe> \.:)e,f"'e. f"~tlJo,l re.d. ~Df' Qv.o.r+cr~
&rov.nJ. \0~1-er Ot1~ ~dc>. ?\-\. D~?th 1--0 ~,,+er o...q..ef" 'PW'"~< \..)"'~ Sg.SL
L~+t ~it-e. ~+ O~()S
L..-________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan {QAP}
• I
I ()ENISOJ)~ ~ I
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
r~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 3 i dt Q""o..r1'~r Cn·OUl.(I ~ W&o"t~r" ~II
Location (well name): .... 1 _M_W_-....;.).3-'-________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I=tAnner" R DIl.J~ /1'rt
Date and Time for PurgingJL,;~_'/_'L.:....;.\_7 ;)._O_IJ ____ ........ and Sampling (if different) L-I ""_V,....;.A ______ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: ill] pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 .... Q_E_D ____ -J
Sampling Event lo:A:""rterotY Gw 1
M vJ-.;2.t..j Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... _______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance .... I....;~:.....:~_1 ___ ___II!!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 t3~·OD
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ II q .1 D Casing Volume (V) 4" well:l ll. (;8 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '"------'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 118. go Redox Potential (Eh) 1 l13~ Turbidity 1 ~ .J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp .• ( (prior sampling event)1 :;L~
Time 11350 I Gal. Purged 1 \g .1d.-I Time 1 I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance l ~blO I pH 1(;.38 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC 112> .go I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I L13:J: I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) 1.%2.·1 1 Turbidity (NTU) 1 1
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I :;to. ~O
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .;l.og
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 111;2..39 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 11.1 3
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 12o.go
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L..J,;tJ::..£Y.J.A~ ______ -I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
'--________ -'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data WorkSheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I OENISONI)~~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
, See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Location (well name):L-1 -......:...M...:..W.:....:._-.:::;;;2~~ ________ ---J
Sampler Name
and initials: I..,...;Me. ... I-lo IJ;J~h»
Date and Time for l'urgi 11~L....:::.g!...../ 3=-/u2-~O~II ____ -1 and Sampling (if different) a I y 1201 \
Well Purging Equip Used: [f[]pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L-1...::Q"-'e.:::....z::D~ ___ --'
Sampling Event I Qv-.o.l'"te.("I.~ &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-1_~_vJ_-_3_() ____ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 y.O
Specific Conductance 1'-...... 9'"""~ .... 4 ___ -'I f,tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): JCbO.QO
Depth to Water Before Pu rgi n~ II y, bY Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 'b.Se> 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L---=--_-I
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I ~·'3Y Redox Potential (Eh) I 1 q b Turbidity 1 L.. _D __ ----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 ,.~O
Time 1 \930 I Gal. Purged 15-1" I Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~Y~lg I pH 1 b.Y;' I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I p."!:?LI I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 19b I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) L I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of4
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev, 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1,---",£_' ____ --'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .l ~l
Co.71.
gallan(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 13b.l.\5 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 \.~ l.
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 C,.7Q..
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL..:"'''''.L..~:....:A~ ______ ....I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals O! 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Afr;ve~ on ~rrt!: 0..1-1355 . "-"tIt'lt'( "",tl (,.o..rr:fl on sit~ +0 Fur~c MW-.:2.'-\. Pu.r~~ b~~o.t\ 4+ ILf 00.
rv.l"~e~ \,)~1I for ()... +otfAl ot: 3S M;nlA1--e~. u.)1A:h,.. 'h4~ \Jcr~ )·Hlc c.o)or,,+;oYl, MO~1-~'1 c.1eQ,,(" ~
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
f ",( ~{~ \>le 11 ~('\ '. H"", ("'-\, "kcrcc.seJ -J),'o~), O"'~ P"'j< \A #;1 w." r.n d (j I,
P\),r~-e. e"dc:d. (A'S{ 1435. L~ ~;+t ~+ IY3~
An\v~fA. CIA.. ,'i+c.. "".y 0730. 6",-f"'1"'·'1I\. ff"!..>~+ for-SOVV\fl iol\,!) e.v~+~ .st)...vVIofl!J~ w~rl..
c..ol\!..l.-r£;')' e...+' 07Yb~ De.p+k +b wc..-h.r' #...f t~ JCc-~f'~ We.r!... c..o l lc.Ltt:-A W~ 111.\.7'
h~.c -¥ ~ .+~ _t-J-i-O 7~1?
'--________ ....IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Fie1d Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2of4
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
'OEN'SOJ)~~i ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
1-See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13T"(A Q\A~r:tu Gro"""c}... \/j",fu ~Oll
Location (well name): ..... 1 f-\_W_ ... _;L_S-'--________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: Efl'lfl~"" Ho11 :J~ )'T"t!
Date and Time for Purginm'-_3-:.!_3-:.!_:J.-_O_'_l ___ ----' and Sampling (if different) ..... 1 _~_IA ______ ----J
Well Purging Equip Used: [![jpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event 1 Q",,,\.r'tu t; &0 I MW-II Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... _______ ----J
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 -J~-:.q_~ ___ ....JI/lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 11.5.0D
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 14. hb Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 :J-fo. 3lj 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--------'
Conductance (avg) 31/d-.. pH of Water (avg)
WellWaterTemp.(avg) 1 15.37 Redox Potential (Eh)L-1 :l5 __ J_----I TurbiditYL-1 ......;O~_----I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp .• ( (prior sampling event)1 p D
Time 11040 I Gal. Purged I SS.'3'5 I Time 110 Y/ I Gal. Purged I SS. S5 I
Conductance I' r '?-S . 1-1 .~~ 1 pHl b.bl I Conductance I ~Y30\ I pH I ~.q) I
d-.70-;)..
Temp. DC I I'S.~ I Temp. DC I l~.l.\ 1 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ,:55 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 125;;2.. I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) I (.) I
Time 1 lOy:). 1 Gal. Purged 1 55 .iL 1 Time 11OY3 1 Gal. Purged 1 .ss ·'36 I
Conductance 1 ~'8 1 pH [b.g;,: 1 Conductance I ~.?~ I pH I b .Y~ I
Temp. DC 1 \5 .QI 1 Temp. DC 115.3'3 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ;.l. 9q I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~ 9 if I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I Sb ,I..\:;J..
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I ._;2.._17 __ ----'
gallan(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I:t.Y.l .7B I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ A ~ A L, ~ ef ot:' '" ()'-~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Type Added
y N specified below) Y N y
VOCs KI 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~
Nutrients III 0 100 m1 0 Il.I H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals I2SJ 0 250ml 'f] 0 HN03 "fl
All Other Non Radiologies rtl 0 250ml 0 II No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml ID 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) rn 0 Sample volume 0 19 0
CroGn-e-rO\\ '1nO(!1o.l'\'\O If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Afr'I'3C~ on ~,t~ CA.1-Obl.O. -ru.nh~(, CA",c}. E,.-&\((:", 'PT"c~~n+-'\;( 'f"'~ "'fleA f.QI'\'l pl;~ 'e\)C.wt
?w~<.. be~(},f') 0\.1-Ob.?$.. PlAr~e~ -..)ell -For Ot.. -to+eo.J of' ~"O M;"lJoto . WIi.-h·r II,)&tJ c./(,c,r
+~rou~hO"'1-.}hl p\A(~E'. P ",r~e (:11 de~ a n~ .5~ M pJe.5 WCf~ collec1ed ~+ JOI.)5 ,
[)t:p+~ +0 \,.)cJ~(" ~ttcr' PL./~f v.J~~ 1~·~() Let} .si-te e:.-r 10.5'
L-________ ..JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
JSI
0
'f]
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 ()ENISO,})J~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL , See instruction
MINIS FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I ?/~ Q u,CA.rtC(' C:rrou'(ld, W",+c.r ~Oll R<.,s"G\1'VJ pic..
Location (well name):I-I.;...M_W_-~::L=-S _________ ----.I
Sampler Name
and initials: I =t:."'\1-G(' ~o 1\: ).~jlrrl
Date and Time for Purgingj t6/30/~ol \ and Sampling (if different) L..--_"v,_:l._ft _____ --'
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump or([] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) .... 1 ....;;;Q..;..E._D ____ --'
Sampling Event IQ",o..c\'u,,~ &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I M W <~2...
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 ~.O
Specific Conductance .... 1 _'\"-q_~=---__ --'I!-tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): L..;..P"-15_.0_D __ -,,
Depth to Water Before Purgind 74.4.3 4" well:1 ~C;, Y1 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L.-__ --..I
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 331S pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 IS. 33 Redox Potential (Eh) I 530
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)' 'bD
Time 11DL\D , Gal. Purged , 5.'3> .j -k , Time ,1l)41 , Gal. Purged ,5)3.3 g ,
Conductance , 3317 , pH' G .. SL\ , Conductance , ')3>,3 , pHI b ·59 ,
Temp. DC 1 I~·-s~ I Temp. DC I IS:3t1 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1541 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) IS"5':Z I
Turbidity (NTU) I !;.1 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I IOQ2, I Gal. Purged I ~~.b'\ I Time llOYd I Gal. Purged I S3. g \ I
Conductance I ::,':) 17 I pH IG .. S4 I Conductance 13:5J~ I pH I C;;,39 I
Temp. DC 115.'55 I Temp. DC I JS,~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I W I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 :s:m I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Grouridwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 SLj . ::LS gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = 1 . ;2..11
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1.2 4'i.lb 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl .... -'N~/.....;..Il"--_____ ......
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Type Added
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mI 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mI 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250 mI E 0 HN03 tJ 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 mI 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml I!SI 0 HN03 f] 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A1'ri'VG~ Cln ~i-tc. ~+ 0'-30. ~""v (JI.flo. (,.0.(';1\ ?r-t.~ct'\+-for pv.,.~~ ",,~ -S1".\f1!\ p]l~ even+.
p",(~C bc.~().1'\ ~+ Ob'3$. f'v.(~t:.c\. I"o)el\ +o("<l\. +ohd err 250 M:"v.+e.s. \uA+Ci w~ C. )e.~r
+l,rou.jhov.t t~c.. pu.r~c . pV.('5c crr)c4 tA!1J jqlY] plc.5 wCt.S c oJ/u.R.-d (l"f--' 04..5
lett-.slfe ,a-1a~~. Dc?t\ -tt> \..,JCA+cr v.+-trr-p\ArU e ~Ct~ 7~.X)
'--________ -IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
i OENISOJ)~~1 ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL '" , See instruction
MINES : FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER -------.----,
Description of Sampling Event: 13riA Q",{)..rtc( 6-fOlAnt! W~+a ;l.o II
Location (well name): ... , -'M......:....;..W_-...::~--..::;.... ________ ~
Sampler Name
and initials: '-r;.I\nGr HolliAII..!::l)rlt
Date and Time for PurgingJ ..... ....:.~..;..J':>=I'-';1..:.....;o.;;...I_I ____ --' and Sampling (if different) ... , ,;....111._1;1-'-_____ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer
Sampling Event , CJ'V..6.rt <.r ~ 6-W
pH Buffer 7.0 I .b
Specific Conductance ..... ' _q:....J~:......<1 __ ----"IlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 70.1 ,
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L..1_M_W_-_:L5 _____ ...J
pH Buffer 4.0 \.\.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 'I~' .33
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 33.0~ 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. _O~_----I.(.367h)
G.67
Well Water Temp. (avg) ,IS . b~ Redox Potential (Eh) ..... , Y_O_3 __ --' TUJbidity ''---0 __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) I ;tOO
Time , O ~20 I Gal. Purged I I Time , I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~SL'~ I pH I C:,.07 I Conductance I I pH I ,
Temp.oC I 15. b~ I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~O~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1<--_6 ____ --1 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = ,-I ____ ---I
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) b
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labj /'tWA\. I St.-\-of;' 0 0Cs
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml D ~ HCL ~
Nutrients [1 0 100ml D I] H2SO4 r,iI
Heavy Metals [j 0 250ml r2!I D HN03 I:sI
All Other Non Radiologics rj 0 250ml D [2! NoPreserv. D
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml 121 D HN03 []-
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume D []. D
G-en e( 0. \ 1..nor ~ " fI' '( ~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment lc See instruction
A(fi\lC~ on ~i1(. ~1 of)~O, ~nn("( OJ').. &~((;tJ pr~s('nt .tor .s~tv\pllll:J 'G\)G'ni.
Tv.rne~ pv..lV\p on I Lc+ r~r'\ for; M:n l.A+-<-S. ... -roo"-\ sa err Fru,n,e:h:rs.
S.C\l'",p\~;. I.\)e('~ p",\\e~. fi..1 Of(~b. \"J~{r VJC\.s. G)eo..r ~ w~lI .... G(f\ J~ r ;.;jht whet')
~-t. Wer~ ~on(. (,O\I-e(+l~ ~~Mple.~. 'lv..rl'tt~ p\.AMf' of+. L-e.0-~'lte fAt O~4Y .
'--________ --1IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
. Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
D
D
D
[21
D
rn
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I I ATTACHMENT 1 OENISO,/)~ J I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
See instruction
MINES --l FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
D~iption of Sampling Event: 13((>; Gv.(.I.c'h::r G-rovJ)d. UJCA.f.c..(" .:201 I l<-(.~r1 pJc.
Location (well name):L-1 _M:.......:....;W~-..:....%---:;;.... ________ --I
Sampler Name
and initials: Ff,,(I4!'f" Ho",'(}I.(~/-r'W
Date and Time for Purgin~ ~ /:3 0 /:Ao 1/ and Sampling (if different) IL-M_y._A"--_____ ----'
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump or@] bailer
Sampling Event 1 G""IA;( f-c.(' lj & W
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance\-I ..... ~...:.1-'-' ___ -JI!-tMHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Purginm ] b . g I
Conductance (avg) 3("1l.\ ~-------~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
I ~W-)t.j Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_______ ----'
pH Buffer 4.0 I..LO
Well Depth(O.Olft): \-p_~_\_.3_3 __ ---J
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" w ell:I ;t<i·07
3" W II: 0
1(·653h)
(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I".S J Redox Potential (Eh) l\-q_, l1 __ -J Turbidity 1'--0 __ --..1
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)I~'i /)
Time I l\O~ I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I 3bl~ I pH 1 b . .58 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I lbSJ I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :114 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged ..... 1 __ 0 ___ .....
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I C.&
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 D I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 L...-___ --'
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0 L...-...:.... __ --'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl ..... ......;;...#...:.,.'i.;..:'PJ ______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals EilI 0 250ml m 0 HN03 iil
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha !jI 0 1,000 ml (gJ 0 HN03 iii
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment I ~
Arr:\'Id 00 s;t, o..t lIOC, -rAnncr ",,.,a (;-1).((;" pres"n} +0 u>1/~c.+.54"1 f1 e. P1AnU."J'eJ--''''rI)~4
rU.Mp 6n "''';. Lc+ f'uf) ~f' ~ -telA':) 'rl)ir'IV;h:~. 1001.< 1 ,Sc-Y '*' fo.("o.l""l~te"'..), .5a""fJ('
WlA~ c.o\\-e(.tt"J Ik-t 1110, le:.t1-~;+c: 61:1-)lIS . wc..ter \..J~ (.J~o.r .
L...-________ .....IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)~ ~ I ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ,. See instruction
. MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I MW-'J./ 31"'"iXO G)v.Ci\.r+u-Grov..M}\G)C/..f-(.(~Oll
Location (well name):II.-_M_W_-_;l_-:J~ ______ ----J
Sampler Name
and initials: p;. V'\1'1 ~r Holl;()\(,..j /Tij
Date and Time for purgind KI 8/;2,01\ and Sampling (if different) II.-.N...;...'/_It _____ ----J
Well Purging Equip Used: OOpump or@] bailer
Sampling Event I Q",g.d·er\~ (yw
pH Buffer 7.0 '7.0
Specific Conductancel,-~ ...... q ..... j-l-__ -,I!-lMHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Purgind S l.17
Conductance (avg) lS07
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 Q £ D '----------'
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I MW-~3
pH Buffer 4.0 1.1.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I ~5 . 00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ;:t8. b~ 1(·653h)
3" WeLJ:I-. __ 0_----'. (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 /.b.75 Redox Potential (Eh) 1 3 73.... Turbidity I 3. 02.
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 I ga'
Time I tU5 I Gal. Purged I 51-SO I Time I 12J~ I Gal. Purged 11) 1 .72 I
Conductance 1 1~~:i I pH I b.% I Conductance 115 6..5 I pH I 6.37 I
Temp.oC I 16.2$5 I Temp.oC I I (, -S"; I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3~g I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3~5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 7 __ ~ I Turbidity (NTU) Llto I
Time I I~n I Gal. Purged I F21.q3 I Time I 1:l:18 I Gal. Purged I s g. 15 I
Conductance I lS12. I pH I C;·3g I Conductance I '~.?.D I pH I b.31 I
Temp.oC I Ib-b:l.. I Temp.oC I lL. 81 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 36J I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :)S( I
Turbidity (NTU) I g.1 I Turbidity (NTU) I g·1 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I S~.Sq
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm,
S/60 = I ,;2.\1
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 'JJo'3 .7¥, I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl ..... _/!J....!./-'-A ______ --J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 rnl 0 ~ H2SO4 Iil 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 rnl ~ 0 HN03 r!I 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 13 0 [)
c'h lor i J (' If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Sv.\rc.J-c Preservati ve:
IDS
See instruction
Comment
A("r;\J e~ 0(\ s,'t<-(Af 07,",S.--r;Y1ntr' 1i\t1J. CrM(;t'\ pr'~scnt JOr p'-t(j'C t:in~ .5a.M p]J'II'I(j C=\JGnr.
l' \Ar~'C. be~",1'\ ~t 0750. P"'(~('A well .fu( 0.. +0+",1 of :J.7D M :nv..+<.~. \.Vod-er tV~5.
c.)-Ct.l.('" i-~(()\}.~OlAt-+h~ pv.(~e _ P "'r~t:. eY\Je~ a.r'\t! so.",pJe..s W'C('<" coll~c.+~~ ",t I~D
L-e..t.t ~ ;+<, v.t-\A;2.S . Dc pth +0 W&o.,te.I fA.A(", pv\'r~< ~c..S 5~.54
'-________ -JI Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
IOENISONl)jJI ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINIES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '31'(1\ Q ",tAr t-{( u-( 0\.\1'\ tA w ~t<.(" ,9,011
Location (well name):IL.......;..M-=--vJ_-_.J._g _________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purgi ngJl..-...,;::;~..:..../=g!-1 ~_o.....;.II ____ -, and Sampling (if different) I'---#._VA ______ --'
Well Purging Equip Used: [g[]pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL.......::Q"-G.=D"--___ --'
Sampling Event I Q v'.."" .... t.el" h\ lr W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL...-M_W_,_J._7 ____ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 '1.0
Specific ConductanceL-I_4..l-9..:....''''-__ -III-tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1110.00
Depth to Water Before Purginm 77. () 1 4" well:1 ;2.1.50 IC.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L....---=--_----'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) L-I _L1.:...:()"""'{;""-9.L.-____ ---' pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I ]5.161 Redox Potential (Eh) I q b g TurbiditylL....-° __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)lL...Il~~_D ---I
Time I}HS I Gal. Purged I Li2.31 I Time III H. I Gal. Purged I Ll~ .53 I
Conductance I ~D64 I pH I 5.75 I Conductance I i.{D70 I pH I 5.71 I
Temp.oC I 1$.80 I Temp.oC I If,.gl I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~3.5 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I Llf)g I
Turbidity (NTU) I b I Turbidity (NTU) I D I
Time 111 11 I Gal. Purged I '-\:1.:79 I Time I I 118 I Gal. Purged I qX .~, I
Conductance I ~Db7 I pH I 5.K~ I Conductance I :\D71 I pH 15'.1& I
Temp.oC I IS.S5 I Temp.oC I 15.& I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 90bR I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~&:J I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
White Mesa Mill
FIeld Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 Y3.y D
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ,-I _._~_\7 __ --,
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 11'1g.18' 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-....;,.tv....:./..:..A~ _____ ---I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservati ve Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
C h 'or; de If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preserv ati ve:
Comment
l I See instruction
Arr:l)e~ on .~J~~ ~t 015E. -) ... .,1\(.( ~"J.. CtMrlY\ P(£S~flt-..hr f\.Arj~ ~nJ.... .st\tr'lpl :flj -€\JoUIt-.
f' u..r~<=.. 6e~(A(\ ~+-O~OO. Pv..r~;::A well for r;.. 1-ot~1 of=' :Z06 M :"V-+'t"~. wafer wa.S c)eo.,--tJ.,(ov.~h()c.J­
+hl pv.ftr P\A,r~c ~n~t'rA "nA .s~mple ~ ,o/l ... <.h-~ D..1' II.:(D . Left-.si.J.c: ~J.. JZ).I.j.
'--________ ..... 100 not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 20f2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I ATTACHMENT 1
I !lENISON') ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
I MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13 (01 Q\Ao..rte.r L:rround\ \..J o.+er ;;tD) I
Location (well name):IL-""'_W_-_:l_4 ________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials:
See instruction
Date and Time for Purgi ngJ~%<..:../....;~:..:./.;.....1.!_O--=1 J~ ___ -, and Sampling (if different) IL.:..,;J_/_~ ______ --,
Well Purging Equip Used: [!I] pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL-Q.;....t_D ____ -.l
Sampling Event I Q"'G\(+er~ &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1 ..... _M_W_-_l_~ ____ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _4..:...~.r....;~:""'-__ ....J1 !-tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 1.:2.7.00
Depth to Water Before Purgingj lca...lS 4" well:1 1G.;a. 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '----=-------'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) ~.20
Well Water Temp. (avg) 11.5·0' Redox Potential (Eh)1 a..: 2=50 __ --, TurbiditYI-I _J 7 __ ----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling eventll 18«1
Time 10'\40 I Gal. Purged 1 S 1. Lj.f, I Time l oq '-\\ I Gal. Purged 131. bog I
Conductance 1 C\ ~ l.\ ~ I pH 16 .:;t?. 1 Conductance 14850 I pHI b.)g I
Temp.oC I ls.Db I Temp.oC 115.0Zf 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I iSG I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 125 c 1
Turbidity (NTU) 11i.1 I Turbidity (NTU) 117.0 I
Time I 0 9 l.1.;2. 1 Gal. Purged 13 \ . 89 1 Time IOql.]~ 1 Gal. Purged I 3~.1 \ 1
Conductance 14Bqq 1 pH ICO.a::!) 1 Conductance !LJ<5 YD 1 pH 16220 I
Temp.oC I lf"D7 1 Temp.oC 115.6.5 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 .2. qg 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) I::Q y } I
Turbidity (NTU) I J b . 2i 1 Turbidity (NTU) 11=='.0 !
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 3:2. ..:55
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1,---, .;;....~_17 __ --'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I I'ig.~ 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL....:..;;v~'/tJ~ ______ -I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservati ve
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs D D 3x40 mI D D HCL D
Nutrients D D 100mI D D H2SO4 D
Heavy Metals ~ D 250 mI rll D HN03 IX]
All Other Non Radiologics D D 250 mI D D No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 mI D D HN03 D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
I "1': See instruction
Arrj\)(.A 01\ ~i+e ~f 0711. ''''''n~( ~"J. G-a.((,:n pr-e.se.nT -For y>",r64!. GI.,,~ .sf,~'P);':j 'E.\lGfll
E.".r~c. b'C.~(;,"'" ~:t 07/5.. Pv..([j-e~ ~~Il .\0,. d\.. +b+1,.1 of 1St> M;r1~·h~~. w~f(r'" wc..s
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
\'Y\O>1-~ LlefJ.(". PlAf.jG c;n~c£k ~Y\A .s"Mplc~ \t.)c:(<. Golle(:\-e~ ~t o~45. P~?+h ,·h Wq1-"(/ vJc..s lOY.6.Y
L-et1-~;+~ ~J 04 yq
'--_______ --..IIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
! ()ENISONI)~ ~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
[ ,.: I See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINIES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13 ('/JI Q\AlA('~(' 6-rO\A"~ \'uO\+cr ;2.0 II
Location (well name):Ir...;M.:.......:....:w..::........:-3=--D _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1~f5j,--3""-,-,,g.,--()_'_I _______ ---,
--!:flnu -Holl ;dA>\hH
Date and Time for PurgingJL.......68o!L.l....",3~/~=I..:..., ____ ....I
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump or@] bailer
Sampling Event 1 Q",,,rfub (,-w
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _4;.....;1:.....0'1'---__ ..... 1 [!MHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 7 b _ bO
Conductance (avg) :2..115
and Sampling (if different) 1L.....:..;;v:...../.:..J."i'---_____ ......J
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL..-M_W_-_'_y ____ ......J
pH Buffer 4.0 tl.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 ) 10_00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ?-1.8) 1(·653h)
3" Well:L..... _0 __ --'. (.367h)
b-bO
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I !)-'7~ Redox Potential (Eh) I ;2.3 0 Turbidityl'--C __ ----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling eventll .:;2.b1)
Time 11 l1L\O I Gal. Purged I q 9 .li ~ I Time 11L\L\J I Gal. Purged I y Y. 70 I
Conductance 1 'd--lll I pH I 6. .5q I Conductance I .:2Jl3 1 pH 1 {,.,"O I
Temp. DC I rS .7S I Temp. DC 1 15 .7." 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 .%2.8 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I
Time 11YI..\2. I Gal. Purged I y Y .41 I Time 111.-)14:3 1 Gal. Purged 1 Y 5. J '3 1
Conductance I :;2..,1~C) 1 pH I c;. c:.o I Conductance 1:2) 17. 1 pH 1 G;,.GI 1
Temp. DC 1 \ 5. 61 I Temp. DC 1 ~5.80 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 XIS I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 j;i;& 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) 1 b 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 4 S. S 7
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1-1 -.:' ;;;..:::...........:17'--_-----'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1,;1,.0\.01 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labj AW,IIl... 1 ~ d of' \J DG~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Type Added
y N specified below) y N Y
VOCs C1 D 3x40 m1 D [} HCL III
Nutrients [j D 100 m1 D 121 H2SO4 ijI
Heavy Metals ~ D 250ml ijI D HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies ~ D 250ml D EilI No Preserv. D
Gross Alpha [1i D 1,000 ml r2lI D HN03 I1l
Other (specify) r!:J D Sample volume D rll D
&~r1M&.J :ft, O~(Af\ ;(S If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A(r"'''~~ Ot"\ .s;·h:. CA.f lllCl. -}o..nl't'r O-r1A &6.(,;(1 ?("ese~+ -to r pv.'j< "'r1r-\ .so.Mplj e\Jt!:tlt-
Pv..(~C b~~l".\1"\ tAt \1\.~, Pw~cc}, lJ.)~11 to(o.. 1-o-t~1 of ~Jo N;nlAtcs. pW~(~"J~4&tt
ILILJ5· v.JGl.tcr ""CtS c.1~lA.'" 1;,ro"'"S0u...1-pl..\ ... t~-5<"MpJ~ Were lolJecJ-c:J c:..t 1~'i5 .
Dt:p~ 1-0 \..J()..1-cr ~-A-a pV.(~{, ~~.s 7,B.£y L~ft sit~ ",1 1457
L...-________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
"Field Data Worksheet for Groundwate"r
N
D
D
D
~
D
Itt
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
1--:' See instruction I OENISONI)~ ~ i MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Description of Sampling Event: 1'3«11 Q v'-cu-te(' &'-OUo.Yld. W()..t<(" ~o, I
Location (well name): .... 1 _fVl_W_-3_1 ________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~rlrler Holl;l~/T/t
Date and Time for PurgingJ ....... ....;;;.f!......;/:;)...'-'-"/:J.'-O_'_l ____ --' and Sampling (if different) ,N'/A '---~~-----~
Well Purging Equip Used: []!]pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I Qv.Q.Au l,:1 &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1_M_W_-_3_~ ____ ---,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 11.0
Specific Conductance ....... 1 ----,q'-!.q....:....q __ ---'If-lMHOSI cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1130.DO
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ G3 .9Q Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~j .87 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L....-__ ---'
Conductance (avg) l,\ \4 L--_~~ ____ --' pH of Water (avg) boo b(. L.-....;;;.~ ______ ~
Well Water Temp. (avg) I } 5 .5) Redox Potential (Eh)1 l{5-'. Turbidity lL...:6=--__ ~
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 11 0
Time 113 SS I Gal. Purged I 7,,\.;2.0 I Time 1135b I Gal. Purged I ..., q .. y~ I
Conductance I l~ IS I pH I ~.b5 I Conductance I l~ 14 I pH I b-bEl I
Temp.oC 1 )5.5:1:: I Temp.oC I IS.~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 197d-. I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 957 1
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time 11357 I Gal. Purged 1]9. (.3 I Time 113Sg 1 Gal. Purged 111. $5 1
Conductance 119 n; I pH I b.bC I Conductance IIq13 1 pH 1 G.6J 1
Temp.oC 1 /5.51 I Temp.oC 115.Y1 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 9:$0 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 yqg 1
Turbidity (NTU) I (5 I Turbidity (NTU) I (5 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 80. ;2,9
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = IL..-...,.;;,' ;)._17""'-_--'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca 'ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 3 ~7,~g I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labf A\JAL \ .sd' oJ' oJOC.s
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indieate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Type Added
y N specified below) y N y
VOCs 6!1 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL 1St
Nutrients ~ 0 100ml 0 121 H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ijI 0 HN03 181
All Other Non Radiologies [] 0 250ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha Il 0 1,000 ml rn 0 HN03 129
Other (specify) [lI 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
&c,,((~\ :rf'\or~~p,n ~(.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preserv ati ve:
See instruction
Comment
Arri\J~~ on Sift oJ 07~S.-ro..nner ()J'Ij, G-o.rr;fl pr",k/rf .for plAr~( IJ"fjJ. .s~/VIpl"'j ~1JC!nf.
P"'r~~ be~"" "'.) 1154 ?V\~~a ~eJl .for 6... +oi-~' of 37() M:nv-teS. W",+er t.L>c.;.s cJ~4("
~),(Ddo "J -}1,< p"'r~G. f>",(~V enat~ MJ S~rrJf'<~ LOe(~ coJJ"C+~J "J IYDD.
D~pth t. I,;)".I-« ",0er f\M~C ~oJ:, 12,<\5 l..e-tt sife ... t 1'112
'--________ --"Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field D,j'ta Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
~
0
'f:1g
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
1 OENISONI)J J ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 G See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Location (well name):L-1 _M...;..,w_-_3_:l. _________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: ~Mler HolI;JIA.!1/1H
Date and Time for PLLrgingJ'-.::...'t,/:....::;.~/.....:U)~J-=-' ____ __J
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 1 Q \.J.o.rta'l~ rr \0
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0
Specific ConductanceL...1 .....::'f...;..94...!-__ ---II!.lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgind 7 b. 30
Conductance (avg) YIO\
and Sampling (if different) L.;..I~....;./_A,---_____ ---,
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I QED
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-I N_1._A ______ .....r
pH Buffer 4.0 L\.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): I \~.b()
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:13b. bCf 1(·653h)
3" Well:L...... _O __ .....I,c.367h)
pH of Water (avg) L...1_6_._0 _9 _____ .....I
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 15. )S Redox Potential (Eh) ,-,I 2_/q-'--_---' T ur bidity L.....11_b_-..;..1_---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling eventll lq6
Time 1 130D I Gal. Purged 1 ,;).... f,q I Time I l~OI I Gal. Purged 17.;2..91 I
Conductance I :10gb I pHI b.ID I Conductance I ~1D3 I pH I b.O? I
Temp.oC I 15 ·/'-1 I Temp. DC 1 lS.)3 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I Zl~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1..22.1 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 lb·z I Turbidity (NTU) Llb.'1 I
Time 113o,;t I Gal. Purged I ]"'>·1~ I Time 113 03 I Gal. Purged 1 733LJ I
Conductance 1 il Q~ 1 pH 1 b.D'l I Conductance 1 gll~ I pH 1 b.IO I
Temp.oC 1 )~ 17 . I Temp. DC 1 )5 .jg I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;2..18. 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) 121' I
Turbidity (NTU) I l~·~ I Turbidity (NTU) 117.1 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Wci"rksheet for Groundwater . 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 73.7g gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 . :;2.11
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 33<6 .~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl,-~_IA _______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mI 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mI 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 mI 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 mI 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 mI !l 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
G See instruction
Arr:\lG~ on ~i+e ~.} 07;l). ""l&..lInc. ... ",,,J. &Mr;n P"'~'!'<:"-+ -tor pv.l'jt' o..t'\J. ..s<1\tVJpJ~':j e\l~r'I-}.
Pu..(~(: bG~o.n td 0/25_ P\"\(JeJ Well ~r 0\ -to+¢.l of' 3'1D M 'lnlA+~)
WGL'tc, hlA.~ \J~r~ 1 ;i+l c Golcr",to'1 Mo.sJh cko.r ~ Pv.r~ C eYlJeJ ~t/d
~~(Vlp)e WCA.S c. ,11c::c·h J 0\1 )30,!)'. f)c:p1-~ fa wo..+CI' 4.+-h:r purde WG\-S ~J..5{)
Left S:+-G t?J \307
'--________ ...JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I OENISOJ)J ~JI ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 '3,rli Q",~A'"G(" G-rouf\A \NfAta -:lOll
Location (well name):L..1 ....;.M_W_-.....;~::.....-:.....-_______ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: I 'i*An"~r HolI .-J'S1.fn1
Date and Time for Purgin~ ~J~O /:;"DII and Sampling (if different) lL-fJ_·....:.1 Pr-'--_____ ----'
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJ pump or@] bailer
Sampling Event 1 Q~o..r·h.rW & \J
pH Buffer 7.0 L-I _7..!..-'-. O ___ .....J
Specific ConductanceL-1 ..... '1w..q3..L--__ --I1 !J,MHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingf 7b. \0
Conductance (avg) g \\ I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IQED
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L..I_M_~_~ ______ --I
pH Buffer 4.0 '1 .0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \3~50
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 3b.~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: C5 (.367h)
"-------'
Well Water Temp. (avg) I IS. b~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~Dfo TurbiditYL-1 _g_.O __ .....
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)II-I_';o_---J
Time 1 )30D 1 Gal. Purged I Z~ .'i)o 1 Time 1 1301 1 Gal. Purged 1 & 7. 0 ) 1
Conductance 1 YIOb 1 pHI b.~1 1 Conductance 141'0 1 pHI b·~J 1
Temp. DC I 15 ·105 1 Temp. DC I 15.7/ 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) lQ:06 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2.ok) 1
Turbidity (NTU) I g ·l I Turbidity (NTU) I Is·O I
Time I 1'30:2.. 1 Gal. Purged I fb,7.23 1 Time 1130 ') 1 Gal. Purged I 37. 'is I
Conductance 1 :lIO,! 1 pH 1,==-.2,1 1 Conductance 1 ~~I~ 1 pH 1 b·~O 1
Temp. DC I IS.I:~ 1 Temp. DC I ls .yg I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ?-D7 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I )..,07 1
Turbidity (NTU) I g.O 1 Turbidity (NTU) 1 ;S . ~ 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged' <b -, , 't{6
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 'I-' ~_n"":"""-_-I
gallan(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1334. LJ'3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL-,.J,_'1_A:....-______ -.J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 lOOml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml "f] 0 HN03 "EI
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000ml 'EI 0 HN03 1ll
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
A((':\lGo.. 0" >i-t~ oJ obl5 . -'-;'nne.( An~ (ro..1'(';" ?rl.~ent .to'( ?\Ar~<.. ~fla S(i,.fV'\f ):.:J
e.very\-. ?v..r!!j~ h~~~f\ ""-\-Ob~O. 'Pu..r~~~ w ell .to(' 0--·tc,tA,\ tR licS ~I"II.""+~S .
\,Uf),,-te(' wo..~ Mo~t~'\ LI~G\(' thro~hov...\-?v.r~(.. ?w~t:.-el'lal!:~c::A '\",J. ,)aMple lA)~
(,o\\Gd'<-~ "t-1~()5 . LA .> ;+c:. u.1-13()~.
D-epth +0 W",-\c.r o.+t<r p"'r~~ ",aS. '60.71
L-________ -IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksh"eet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mill .. Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
, OENISONI)~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[I' See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13 r 0; Q V\.CA,.+ec-G-rov.F1 J. w",+c.(' 2.0\ I
Location (well name):L-1 ...;""_W_-_~~ ________ --, Sampler Name
and initials: fi~l1er Ho ));J"'j/..,..H
Date and Time for Pllrgi ngjL-~;::.;/:..;;;;"...!./_;2.._0_1_J ____ -' and Sampling (if different) I /oI/A ~~--------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump o@bailerWellPump(ifotherthanBennet) L-I_Q_E_D ________ --'
I MW-3J Sampling Event IQ~Q.rtt:,.lj (,.. \V Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-______________ ----l
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance 1 I... _q....;..~...:...~ _____ --'I f-tMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgind 11.;l..'1d.
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 l..\.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 11;2.4..50
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 7.f<8 1(·653h)
3" Well:L.... _o~_--'.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 15.33 Redox Potential (Eh) ..... 13_1 0 __ ....... Turbidity 1...1 _0 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb . Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 ~1'
Time 11 Y,:1.S I Gal. Purged I \S.lQ I Time 11 4:2.-" I Gal. Purged 115. LJ 0 I
Conductance 1 L~~~\ I pH 1 b.:;l L] I Conductance 1 L133d-.. I pH I 6..25 I
Temp.oC I lS.3D I Temp.oC I )S·3Et I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 319 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~J::l.. I
Turbidity (NTU) I (':1 I Turbidity (NTU) L () I
Time II L\;l.7 I Gal. Purged 1 1S.b~ I Time 119.2}, I Gal. Purged I 1:.5:· g~ I
Conductance 1 t.\3~3 I pH I (".;2.5 I Conductance I ~~4 I pH I b.65 I
Temp.oC I 1OS .$ I Temp.oC I 15.35 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '301; I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :365 I
Turbidity (NTU) I b I Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged IL.......1.J:::.fo.:..s., ¢;:::.,7!....-...._----I
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm,
S/60 = I . 'J..17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 1;;. .70 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab1 A\J~L Sd of vOG~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 rJ HCL tiiI 0
Nutrients [) 0 100ml 0 I)-H2SO4 I:zt 0
Heavy Metals I:j 0 250ml BJ 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics [] 0 250ml 0 j)?:I No Preserv. 0 or
Gross Alpha [] 0 1,000 ml rn 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) rn 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 IX'
Cr<..n<.r",\ i"Y10(~"",,"0 If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
'--________ ..... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 I OENISOJ)~~
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
Description of Sampling Event: 13i"(X Q\N).d~( G f"Ou,l1a: Wt;..+C'(?.01I Re...5Go-~p k
Location (well name ):L-I _fJ\_W~--=3::"':~==-----_______ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: tr;nne.r 'Ao 1\; JObd htl
Date and Time for Purginm fS/'3o 7 ~) \ and Sampling (if different) IL-#_I..;...,. ______ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL-Q_-e.=D::.....-___ ---'
Sampling Event IQu,,,,,...+"COrb G-w Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L...1_M_W_-_:;;2._b ____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 \..\.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _~...:..'1_'.J..-__ ....J1 /-tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 11.2. 4.SO
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 11;2... ~O Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 g.03 1(·653h)
3" Well: () (.367h) '---------'
Conductance (avg) I,-L_/~--,Gf-,-! _____ -, pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I Ib.l ~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 ;;... Y7 Turbidity 1'---0-'--_---1
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)! U"
Time 1 1L\W I Gal. Purged I lb.~7 I Time 11Q:51 I Gal. Purged 11 '==>. q q I
Conductance ! '-\;2..QS I pH I b.3'f I Conductance ! Y287 I pH I b.LlO I
Temp.oC I lC.7'5 I Temp.oC 11G>:;215 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;2b1 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ,7.41 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) I 6 I
Time Ilq3~ I Gal. Purged I lb,jCi I Time I I ~SJ I Gal. Purged 1 I~.q:< I
Conductance 1~2JS ~ I pH I <0.'""15 I Conductance 1 9~~g I pH 1 b .YO I
Temp.oC I 16. \j I Temp.oC 1 \, ,IS I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ?,.Q1; I Redox Potential Eh (mV) p::qs I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I CJ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I \ 7 . .3 b
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . :l.17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 17Y .O.;2.. I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L.._/J._Y,_~ ______ ----J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mI 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals lB 0 250mI "f] 0 RN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml 19 0 RN03 I!1
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
An"';v~~ on ~1"C:: ,,1 '~l:;l.. ~nnt:r AnfA 6-Q..(t";n f'fe.5t'I1+ ~r ?\.t.~c: tA.'r)J., S"~p 1;0 evcn-t·
P\A('~~ be~t)," ~1-)31S. P\J\<~c~ v:>el\ ~r ~ -to+l'I.\ or go YYJ ;nLAt~>. ~&..·h.r wo....S cl~c" ...
th(O~h()v..r t~e ?v..(~e: . t'v\r~e. endc~ o..",~ 5CA Mp Je v.)l.\S L6 ll~c.te~ ,d-ILI35.
L-e,.\1-~~tt:. ("'1-\1..\3'1. \-:J cpth 1-0 ~~1c( lA.\l-e( 'P\.\(~~ LU",.s IJ3 .00
'---________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 I OENISOJ) ~ I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 r.-See instruction
MINI:S . FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13 1'3\ Q~", .. +e.r GTol..I.f\fX W", fer ;2.0/1
Location (well name):1-1 ;....M.;...VJ~-..;;;3;....;b~ ________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date and Time for Purging\'--'S/_'1....;,I_9-_o_" ____ ----I and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: []]pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event 1 ~ ",o,..}e('~ (,. \0 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_M_W_-_5 _____ -J
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Specific Conductance .... 1 q...:..~~'1.:.-__ ---,1 f,lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): ..... 11a..==---I._b_O __ --'
Depth to Water Before PUTgi nm 110. \oj b 4" well:17,;;"7 1(·653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) 1---..:.....-----'
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 3bl.l~ pH of Water (avg) b.S&
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lb./~ Redox Potential (Eh) I 3Cft Turbidity IL.......:O'---_---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)I~~O
Time 11145 I Gal. Purged I 13.87 I Gal. Purged I..'2.Y.Og
Conductance 1 3b'-\.~ I pH I b.b~ I Conductance 1 3& 0 .1 pH I ~.5 7
Temp.oC I I{;. 7~ I Temp.oC I lb .80
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 315 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ...... 3_'_0 __ -,
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I () I
Time IllY ' I Gal. Purged I !2.'1 :~() I Time I II Y IS Gal. Purged I Q ~ .52.
Conductance I 'S~~.D I pH 1<:).5'1 I Conductance I 3b \.:t pH I 6.5 7
Temp.oC I lb.1Q I Temp. DC I It> ·81
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;'08: I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ...... j_b_g~_-I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) o
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 ?-LJ.'l5
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1-1 _" _2 _1, __ --'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 f,1.oy 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabM·WA L 1 S~+ ~ \JOc.~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 rnl 0 ti(] HCL ~
Nutrients l1 0 100ml 0 18 H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals III 0 250 rnl 'g) 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics rlI 0 250 rnl 0 1tl No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha IE 0 1,000 rnl ~ 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) E 0 Sample volume 0 119 0
(,.LY\cr" \ :I" or ~(An; c.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction . ,
Comment
Arri\lt!.d on s*~ 0.+ ot\~. -reM"C( ,,,,.ld. &Mr:n rr e:>C:frr ~r ? ur~c: ~(lJ. S~t'lfJ:"j eU'111. PIA%c: 1C=S~t1
",t 0<\55 . l\ ... r~t~ \J:)cll for' f\. -tok\ or 11..5 P,;hll':\<:5.. \,J(;\.1-cr v:>a.~ C)t'tir +h(o\)~o\J.}
the ?W~C., PU.(~'C c::nJt'~ ~n~ S ~r-I\p\r~ W(.(~ l:ollC"Lh·J ~1-1150.
Ocp1'\, to \.0cJer ~Q-if ?U.('~c. W4~ 11.?3}. t~f} ~;1'C ~J" 120;;J.. .
L...-________ ~IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
1Q
0
1[J
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 I OENISOJ)J~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13.,..4\ Qv..."'rf~, G-roun a Wo..t:r ~Q 1\
Location (well name):L..I .;...M_W_-_~_7 _________ --,
Sampler Name
and initials: I~nncr Bo)/'';;l"..j l-rlt
Date and Time for Purging/L-g....;.I_'1'-I_;l.._O_" ____ -' and Sampling (if different) l'-s.;;;...:...,.J _J1_/.a_o_/J ____ --'
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,-I .:...;/II~/,Ilu--____ --,
Sampling Event I Qv.GI.;:+~dj Gw I ~W-3{ Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_______ -"
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4·0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _~..:...~...-~,---__ --,I/lMHOSI cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 J;t L go
Depth to Water Before Purgingj J 1 ~. 35 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 5. gL-f 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
'---------'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \6·'13 Redox Potential (Eh) 1 1-\ D~ Turbidity I )74.10
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 ~8 b
Time 11"-\'35 I Gal. Purged 1 5 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I L17J"b I pH I ~.:?~ I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I Ifo·9:; 1 Temp. DC I 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I rtO ~ 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I ] 9.1; 1 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I 1 Gal. Purged I 1 Time I I Gal. Purged I 1
Conductance I 1 pH I 1 Conductance I I pHI 1
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I -I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1 Turbidity (NTU) I 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 S.OO
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1-1 __ 0 __ -'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 6 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 1 ].3b
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 1 g, DO
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabjAW,q L 1 ~c:f err \JO(.:)
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs f] 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL l!I 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100ml 0 ~ H2SO4 t:I 0
Heavy Metals ftl 0 250ml 113 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics ~ 0 250ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha 1$1 0 1,000 rnl ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) lEI 0 Sample volume 0 l!sI 0 M
r;.~r\<:'(()' \ :rt10(~o.r1\ G~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A((';"e-A on ~i+c: 6.:t 1l.J );2.. -r;::nflC'r IMA &(;.U;fl prc!~cn+ -:to 00.: I M I.U -37~ 'BP.:J~ h~"t7 o..t )417,
l3,(At~a u-Ill-;/ \0e f;lI~a ",..5 ~A.I}D" Je,lAL~(t .f"\A/I. 'Ioo\..< I Scf of' PGlt'C\rtletcr.s S.}/a./~h}­
ov.~ of the bu.tkd-. "CrY)p+H~c\ b\A(l.<d" l1\n~ bll\:lcJ 3 More Cre;}/oflS . fS'I ;Jd ueJJ c;\~~. ~~tc( stfAdcJ. ()\).f (.l«().(, ~of eX ,;±! tI.s LUG ~:~v.rl71:~_ LG~ ~ ,·1-G t?-t J Y4; .
It,.,.. lJe6 on 5..+e:. aI.+ o~,o . IMIlU MJ. 6-~(( JI procI1t +0 (oll~C+ .so.mpJ-(..s. p~ I"~~ +0 l.o)~hr 14l4.s );to .00 .
s..()."'lpJ(~ Were h()l ;l~~ ",1 08IS . L~+t .sih .;oj o~. \..J~.J.('"r r,.)e.-S J irl-!j ~
L-_______ ---II Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 I OENISOJ)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
k~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13ra Q",c;.d'.a &rOlAnJWo..t'l:f ;lO\l
Location (well name ):11..-L8 ...... \N...;......-_b;;c0=--________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~nnt:r H oll ;J4~/nl
Date and Time for PurgingJ ..... -=g..:...;/3;:;..L.:/~;.....;;....I_J ____ -" and Sampling (if different) AI/A-~~~-----~
Well Purging Equip Used:l]I]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event Q",L\rh·r1j (,.W
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
Specific Conductance 11-......-'4L...:~....L~ ___ ...JII-lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purging/ 7 D .7 b
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... I_M_W_-_~ _____ --'
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.O 1 ft): I l~1.33
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 33.0;l.. 1(·653h)
3" Well:\-. _o __ ~.(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) IL....'_· O_7'---____ ----J
Well Water Temp. (avg) 11 s. 6J-Redox Potential eEh)1 L\o~ TurbiditylL....-6 __ ----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 ~O·
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L-I __ 0 ___ ----' gallan(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 11.....-___ --'
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) o
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl !fwA l s-et of \Joc..5
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indieate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 Gil HCL 181 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 r8 0
Heavy Metals r, 0 250ml IS!I 0 HN03 [2J 0
All Other Non Radiologies ~ 0 250ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha lSil 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 RN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) [] 0 Sample volume 0 Ij. 0 ~
CreY\e.(oJ :rJ\O(~(M'; c..s If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment r See instruction
,-________ ...... 1 Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONI)~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment I
C;. See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
D~scription of Sampling Event: I 3r~ Q;"'rter G-rOv.nJ Wo.."f~(" ::to II Re..so.Mf1-<.
Location (well name):II--___ M_W_----=:I~ _______ __'
Sampler Name
and initials: I -rcMnt." »olll'J~/-rJf
Date and Time for Purgin~ ~J3D/~11 and Sampling (if different) N/A
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event Q\)..(Art~(&1 trw I ~W -1y Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_______ ----'
pH Buffer 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 1..1.0
Specific ConductanceL..1 ----"q:....:.~...!.q ___ -II /-tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 11;1.). 3~
Depth to Water Before Purginm 7fo. is I Casing Volume (V) 4" w ell:1 ~q .0"7 1(·653h)
3" Well: t::> (.367h) '-------'
Conductance (avg) 3b 14 pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 1(;...57 Redox Potential (Eh)1 41Y Turbidilyl,-_o __ -,
Weather Condo Ext'/ Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event) 1 ~yo
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundw'ater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 11..-_....;;.0 ___ --'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in ~pm.
S/60 = L-I __ (0_, r> __ -,
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca iog volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 D 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) 0 L--___ ---'
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 0 L--___ ---'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabIL----=:..I"'_/~A_=__ _____ _.I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indieate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals I:J 0 250ml m 0 HN03 IE 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha C» 0 1,000 ml III 0 HN03 III 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
L-________ -II Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater "2of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
k See instruction
,
IOENISOJ) J,I
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ~('a; Q\AlArh (" &rou.." OJ WlA..+~r ;2..0 /I
Location (well name):L-1 _M_W_-_7_0 ________ ----I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-r6.I)}1U lJoll/d'\;j/lIJ
Date and Time for Purgingj ~/lol ;)..0/1 and Sampling (if different) .I'-"/A L--_______ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![Jpump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL--Q_~_D ____ -.J
Sampling Event 1 Q \1\v-r+CI"t1 &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I Jv\ l.\)-37
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific ConductanceI-I ----"1_&f-L9 ___ .... I~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 113Y.O()
Depth to Water Before purgind -, 0 .:lS 4"well:1 LJI.(.Q\ 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L...--__ ~
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 1&.'3 X Redox Potential (Eh)L-I_'3_I_I _-, TurbiditylL...--_O __ -,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 IB 6
Time 1 I Gal. Purged 1 I Time I I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I I pH 1 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I gY .63
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (0), in gpln.
S/60 = I .?. 17
gallan(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 383·{'1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL _/V_/----!4 ______ -l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indieate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals m 0 250 ml 129 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 1:1 0 Sample volume 0 Il:I 0 ~
S v.. \-r IA+ e.-If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
--rD) Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
0+ MW-J5
'--________ -lIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
OENISO,.!) ~ J WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL I See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 13rA G",o..r+~('" G rOI.).)1 J c::s 0. tc(' ;tD II Re ~GId>')pJc..
Location (well name):L-I __ M_W_-_"l_O ________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: l-ro.nfl-e1" H 011 i ~o...:1/,..tt
Date and Time for Purgind a. -'-1-;l.OI / and Sampling (if different) "'/4 ~~~-----~
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L.......;Q~e....;:D~ ___ .....J
Sampling Event I Q..J...(Ar 1'er6 c,.W I N"/A-Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_______ -"
pH Buffer 7.0 7·0 pH Buffer 4.0 L4.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _~...!..q...:........!.9 __ --I1 /lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I 13Y.O C
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 7D.:U; Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 \..1}. '=-2 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '-------'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) b.31
Well Water Temp. (avg) I HS. g2 Redox Potential (Eh) I l-\ I S TurbiditylL....-_O __ ....J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 1"1 II
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2'
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ~ '1 . b '3
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . ::L1 7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca ing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I :)~3. ~ I I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL..._/V._/....:.../} ______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100rnl 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 11 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rnl 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
'--________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
FielcfData Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab Cl
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
July 2011
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurarice Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONI)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
~ ~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 0" u..1~ f'l\on+hGl &ro u,,(\t\ vJo.."tGf"" :to II
Location (well name):L-1 _M_W_-_l_' _________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: tw-Ylr1 e.r Hollr·f.Xt:t~ /-r'H
Date and Time for Purgingj1....7_I,-b_1 J).._o--'Il'--___ -' and Sampling (if different) 1-1 _fJ_I_A ______ .....I
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,-I Q_t::_D ____ ---'
Sampling Event I MonfhS &-w
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _Q--'9'-9 ___ -'IIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ '6$.95
Conductance (avg) ~qD7
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I M W -1 L\
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 )30.00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ?b.~6 1(·653h)
3" Well:,-. _D __ -,.(.367h)
I.D3
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 'S. b.5 Redox Potential (Eh) ,-I _<J-'--O __ --' Turbidity ,-I 0 ___ -'
Weather Condo 1'-_____ ' _______ ---' . [JOV-cA:j
Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling eventll22. 0
Time 11~lb Gal. Purged I (; I. gq Time I 1,9, J I I Gal. Purged I b2-O£: I
Conductance pH 17.00 Conductance I ;)..'10b I pHI 7.03 I
Temp. DC 1 15.'"73 Temp. DC 1 IS.~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 11.--8::;:..'=3_--, Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 1;l... 1
Turbidity (NTU) 0 Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I 12.1a Gal. Purged 1?7?-..:;:L]' Time 1)2.1 3 I Gal. Purged I b;J.. Y.:J. I
Conductance 1 ;2..10; pH 1 7.09 Conductance 1;.L.9 0 B I pH I 7~O7 I
Temp. DC IS.GO Temp.oC IIS.CI I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,-I _9_3 __ ---' Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '1,) I
Turbidity (NTU) o Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I b;t .13
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ! . .?-17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q = I ).'-17.05 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab0'WA l setc:r V OG..s
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs IZ:I 0 3x40 ml 0 IN HCL il
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals IE 0 250ml I!I 0 HN03 I!J
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A(""(";veb.. 0)'"\ ~it~ c....+ 0121. lo.l'll'l-e.r »o\l ;J.~ ?rc,.s..efl+-+or 'f'l.'.('"j~ 6..r'\~ so.Y"\pl;~ ~\.l~rrt.
?\A(~e.. bejO<l" o..-t 0125. ?lA(~~fd-. \De.1I ~(' ~40 M:Y"lv.~-c.~, \.0~ic( v.:~ c..ko.l
+h ro~ov}-fh-G PAr~r ?\Ar~e. enJe~ (At'\tA .5o./'Ylp)CS \.Je(~ c.olJec..+eJ. "'\ + b2..JS
L€+t ~ ;tc. lA'+ blJ..O.
D e p1i t D \0IA.+cr o..fu ? lA.( ~f 8'J.) J
L..-________ .... !Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONI) ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
I~j See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I \:5"-,,8 No (\fh l,j GO rOu. n Cl Gj ",,+e.r .:to I \
Location (well name):II-...;",.M_W_-_I_LJ ________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: 14"''''nner AomdO,.J::J ITt)
Date and Time for PurgingJL--7_/_..5_I_~_O_1,;"..1 ___ --' and Sampling (if different) Al/,A I-~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump or@] bailer
Sampling Event I Month I~ G-VO
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _q....:...~j-'--__ -'I~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 103. q 4
Conductance (avg) 1L-.:3::;..q-.:....:::3~5J-___ --I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL-Q_E.---=D ____ -'
I MW-30 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '--_______ --'
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 1~. 70
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well: I 1 b. 1b 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. __ D_----". (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 15.573 I Redox Potential (Eh) I .:3 8 Turbidityll--4_1_---J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 131 ~
Time I )4J5 1 Gal. Purged I ~L\,l:;2.. 1 Time I lgw;: 1 Gal. Purged I ~ Ll. Cj:3 1
Conductance 1 r~A 3'3 1 pHI " ,9-1 1 Conductance 1 3tf)?5 1 pH I b.5D 1
Temp.oC I )? (,6 I Temp.oC I \5.55 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 31 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3Z I
Turbidity (NTU) I Ll I Turbidity (NTU) I <'1 I
Time I lq;)'l I Gal. Purged I ~S.15 I Time I lQ:2.<D I Gal. Purged 13S.31 I
Conductance I '3~3b I pH I c:.qs I Conductance I 3~.3{., I pH 1(; .LJ6 I
Temp.oC I 17·59 I Temp.oC I 12.'0 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~zj I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~j I
Turbidity (NTU) I .(J I Turbidity (NTU) I .(J I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev, 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 35.80
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm,
S/60= I .2017
gallan(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = II qq. 0 I I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~~_./IJ_'/_A~ _____ ----l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
13 See instruction
L..-_______ ----IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONI) ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 'S"'\~ MC>r'\flll~ GfD I.A.liO\ Wo...+~(' 2..0 I I
Location (well name):IL P\_W_--.;2.-.,.;;;5~ _______ -,
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-'-;'(I/1<..r RoJl."Jo.!;1h+1
Date and Time for Purgin~ 71 ~ I 2...0/1 and Sampling (if different) I ~/A '--------~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or@] bailer
Sampling Event I Monthl~ Cry.)
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
Specific ConductanceI.-I ~q ...... 44...1-__ --,'~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 7~. b \..\
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event LI_M_W_-_I_I ____ --I
pH Buffer 4.0 q,o
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 115.00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ;:u.,.3S 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L..-__ -J
b.36
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \5. ~ Y Redox Potential (Eh) 1.-' ...:...;ll'-D __ --' TurbidityI.-' _, ,_5 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 1.:)..0
Time , ';;US I Gal. Purged I (;9.0 1 I Time IluC:. I Gal. Purged ,bY.X) I
Conductance I '3>:2.' ~ I pHI ~.30 I Conductance 1 3~J I pH I b-30 I
Temp.oC I IS .?-8 I Temp.oC I lS,?,::. I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I III I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ID~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I l.S I Turbidity (NTU) l I·S I
Time Il:;2.~J I Gal. Purged I f29 . ~y I Time I J.:2..d.g I Gal. Purged I 6g.b6 I
Conductance I ~;L.I~ I pHI b.3 ] I Conductance 1~lg I pH I (;, ~q I
Temp.oC I I s,n I Temp.oC IIS .?.l I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 11 0 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1)1 D I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1. b I Turbidity (NTU) I \.(. I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 65.10
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I ·2 11
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I .2 ~6' q 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL..---:...:/\/...:....'1:..:..A ______ -'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals [B 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 rnl 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
,... See instruction
l ~.J
Ar'r i\J'C,tJ. C(\ ~if<.. ~t o7:J..7. ~I"\nt.r" ~o 11 :J'j j":lr~sc:l'\+ ~r pv.r~'C. tAYlcA .s~Mrl;1I1i\ -e\l<?V\+.
?\A(,~<' b~o..r'\ ",t 07:30 . F\ .... rjet,\ W~J) kor d-... +Dt~) Of 30D M;(llJ\fc.s~
\NC\.{-<;(' vJ~ C,).eo..c Pv.r~'C.. cnd e.c\ tA.flJ.-Stt.Mf)e~ v.Je(~ LDl)e(.l~~ ~+ J23D.
Drr-~ -k ~(/ 6(.ficr p\A(~C ~u..s. 7£. bO o
L -ctt f, i tc tA.+ )23S-
L...-________ ~IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)J~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL r I See instlUction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 vv..\~ Mo;;rthl~ CrrolAr'\~ Wo..+~r 2011
Sampler Name
Location (well name):1-1 A~W_-_~:;.....:;...h _________ --J and initials: fiMl'\£r +!oll;~~/T'H
Date and Time for Purgingj 71 ~ 1 {)"'OI\ and Sampling (if different) 1-:1 J"I_/:....;,A-=--_____ -'
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!] pump or@] bailer
Sampling Event ,Mon+n l~ G-W
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance!L--.!.9Q,...:..q ___ -IIIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 7 U, • ~o
Conductance (avg) 3Y71
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_M_W_-_;l._S ____ -'
pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): 11;2.1.33
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:II-_O __ -lI(.653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 115.37 Redox Potential (Eh) 1 1 ~n TurbiditylL-Z_1 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 203·
Time 1 O,yq I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~L\l1 I pH I 6.35 I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C ! )5.37 ! Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ! 1~1 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I 2::1 I Turbidity (NTU) l J
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. °C I I Temp. °C I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 __ 0 ___ ----'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 s· C;
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~I-_;J_/...;../d ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Type Added
y N specified below) y N Y N
VOCs fl 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~ 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250 ml ~ 0 RN03 'EJ 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 RN03 'fg r:J
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 e9 ,~ -'KI
Ch\oriJ( If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
TDS Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
An-~\)~ Con ~;+.:. 6.t 074;t.--r;Y\Y\(r ~oll'oc\:J rrc~~Y\-} iD coIled-s~Mp1~~. loOK I sd-of'
ffA(o-.Me.+~rs. WCA.+~r wG...S [.J.c 0.. (. ~G\fYJ pl~ w t: \~ {.oJlcc+cJ 0.+ 0750.
le+t-s ;+t:. ~+ 0757.
'--_______ ---'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPj
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISOJ)J~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[-" See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I v~,~ Mon+l1~ G-rov..()dWo..1 ~r ~OIJ
Location (well name): ..... 1 _1"1_1.0_-_'3;::....;;..0 ________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-,-;"" n c. f' H 0 J I:J ";1/ry
Date and Time for Purgin~L_f~J_=5::;..:/.::;.:J...;.::D::..!1..!..1 ___ ---I and Sampling (if different) .N /.4-~~~-----~
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL........:Q::...;...=E~D=--___ -I
Sampling Event MoY\thl~ (,-W Prey. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I MW-3 )
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y,Q
Specific ConductancelL-_~:.....;g~~ __ -,blMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): llO .Oo
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ Ib."SS 1 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ?-1.9>Lf 1(·653h)
3" Well: § (.367h) '-----'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) b.b7
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 j S .Of> Redox Potential (Eh) 1 1 S b Turbidity IO-L.._I __ -'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)1 :;<g"
Time 11195 I Gal. Purged 1 '13.1..\0 I Time Ill~~ I Gal. Purged I Y 3. (. 1 I
Conductance I ;).i)C:.8 I pH 1 Co.63 I Conductance I~DbS I pH I ~.77 I
Temp.oC I I~.oq I Temp.oC I )!;.O7 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I IS;;l.. I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 15L I
Turbidity (NTU) I <I I Turbidity (NTU) I L. I I
Time IIJ:17 I Gal. Purged I LJ3. &3 I Time 1)1;2£ I Gal. Purged I 4 ~. aS I
Conductance I ;l.DC.4 I pHI b.bb I Conductance I ?-o"" I I pH I b.t5 I
Temp.oC I lS.07 I Temp.oC I )S· 016 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I lsg I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I lbl I
Turbidity (NTU) I <..1 I Turbidity (NTU) ILl I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1'-_Y'-'~"'-'Y...LIg-,---_----,
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1,----" ~'--\ ....... J __ __'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 :;1.0J.3\ 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL..-->l..::tJ~/j,.;A~ _____ --J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients (). 0 100 ml 0 OJ H2SO4 LlI
Heavy Metals 6-0 250 ml rn 0 HN03 r5J
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 111 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
C'n \ 0,') ~e If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
r-"4 See instruction
I ' -? J
Afr: vd 0(\ s"'h~ 0..+ ogOD . -r"IHler' i-io )L'd~ ff'{.SCrrl-for p\.\.r~'( /1..(\~ ~(Amp);~ e\Je.Yl+'
? v..f~-<" be.~~f'I a..+ ogos P\AI~~c>. well for "-}O+v..\ 6f ;to.5, M;nv .. ,.i--c:.S.
\0~f(( \N~ cko...c Pv..(~e eYlaG~ OI.tlA .sv.(VlP lc~ W-e.rc.. c.o}]"t:c+-c~ 0 .. .1-J JJ 0
D~pth +0 W",:tcr ",ftc( ftA'\( w().~ 7'1.03, L:.+r .s ,1-" ",t-JI.J£,
.......... _______ ---IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
1St
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONI) ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 W See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 0 :..-~j PI or1t-h 8 &"1"0 \.An J\ W CA."'\" cr :2:0 II
Location (well name):I,-_A_w_-_3_1 ________ -'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~rl"Gf' Ho ll'~~/TH
Date and Time forPurgingJ,-7--,1,-..E;_/~_D_JJ ____ --, and Sampling (if different) ,/J/A
Well Purging Equip Used: ~ pum p o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 QED
Sampling Event Mon:}l)G 6-W I ;VIA-Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '--_______ ......
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0
Specific ConductancelL....-_9_Q_Q __ ----'lttMHos/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgind bg,79
Conductance (avg) IB33
pH Buffer 4.0 q.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 130.0'0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Well :~(.653h)
3" Well:~(.367h)
c...c.6
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 15. b~ Redox Potential (Eh) 1 M'8 Turbidity 1,----<....;..,.:.,.1 _----'
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) I ;l.g 6
Time 11:555 I Gal. Purged I ]C/..2..0 I Time I 13S6 I Gal. Purged 1 7Q. Y2-, I
Conductance I lS3~ I pHI 6 .5Y I Conductance I )f{31 I pH Ii;· b3 I
Temp.oC I I S.b~ I Temp.oC I IS.b..:> I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :t;;Z'1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~l I Turbidity (NTU) I <"1 I
Time I 1357 I Gal. Purged I :]~ 1 ~3 I Time I 13 SiS I Gal. Purged I / '9 . gS I
Conductance I JBC)o I pH Ie . b:{ I Conductance 11E3;( I pH I b.PI I
Temp.oC 115. eq I Temp.oC 115 ·51 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I N..~ I ............. Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ;ooZf I -
Turbidity (NTU) I ZI I Turbidity (NTU) I ~, I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ZO .;)..Cj
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . .217
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 3bZ.3g I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL...~:"""";"/"":~'--_____ ----'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients rn 0 100ml
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume
TD5
Sv-1 fo.+<>
C'n \ 0("\ ~e
Comment
y N
0 0
0 Ei
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 I:j
Added Type y
HCL 0
H2SO4 EB
RN03 0
No Preserv. 0
RN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
1:4. See instruction l ,~ ..
Arf";\Je", on ~;+e tAt 07Y5,IG\nnG( 8611:;~ rrc~~Yl1--fo r P\A"'{1~ Ct.nP\ -S"C4"'p':'Zj ~\.l~n7\
?v-r~1: b~~OI\. ~t 0750. P\A(,~~cA Well i-;r "'--t-o ta. 1 of" 3iCJ 'M1'nv..1-es.
WcA.-tcr 1..0c...s G'ea.r }hf"O V\,,\hovJ-P\A('jE:· Pu.r~< en~ed ~ncA .5ctrvJp Je,J werf
c.Dllec+e~ 0-.+ lYoo. P~r-th +0 W~+-e(' cq-fi-cr FV\J ~ VJ~ 7}.90
L -e..rr S 1'+ c 0-. + I Li 07.
L...-_______ --JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
Ei?I
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ)~~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
'...,' See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
D~~p~n~S~li~~~: ~1~_~ __ ~_o_~_h_~~G_rw_n_a_~_a_~_~_~_~_O_II ______________ ~
Sampler Name
and initials: fTO.nn~r' t}oll;J/A.!J/Trl Location (well name):I~ __ M_w_-_~::...-_______ ----,
Date and Time for Purging/L-7-..:/~;L_oJ_':;"_O_I_1 ___ ----J and Sampling (if different) 1-1 ,v,_V-_'Jr ______ ---l
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJ pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ~I _0_&_D ____ -'
Sampling Event 1";,,,1 M_o-'-Ylth.:........::.G"--b_vJ ____ ---I Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1 ~_/A ______ ----,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Lj.o
Specific Conductance .... 1 --J4u.q ...... q ___ ----'I ~MHOSI cm Well Depth(O.Olft): II.?l.\.so
Depth to Water Before Purgingj I u.. LIb Casing Volume (V) 4" well:17. 810 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) "-------'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \5.5.3 Redox Potential (Eh) I 303 Turbidity I 0 ~---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) 1 ;;;..J5 t>
Time 11030 I Gal. Purged I IS.lll I Time 11031 I Gal. Purged 115.-40 I
Conductance 1 ~q I pH I G,.y, 1 Conductance I ~5.3 I pH I b-L/9 I
Temp.oC I 1 ~ • 5;2, I Temp.oC I IS .5'1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 31q I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3D,5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I b I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time 1 103.9-. I Gal. Purged I 15.b~ I Time 11033 I Gal. Purged I 1 ~. fi~ I
Conductance I d.?[S~ I pHI b.Sl I Conductance lu8~ I pHI ) . Y<f I
Temp.oC I lS.~l I Temp.oC I 15.5:;2 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~1 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ljS I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged lIb .~7
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = L-I _. ;;2._1_7 __ ---l
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 7:2. 4t; I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L._N_/ A....;..... ______ ..J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml
Heavy Metals .f3 0 250ml
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume
Comment
y N
0 0
0 0
~ 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Added Type y
HCL 0
H2SO4 0
HN03 ~
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
i"<ii See instruction i ,.:.~
Arrl'Jd.. 01"1 ~Jt: .J-oq p;. "lti\""cr Mo.. (,."'((;1) pr6en} .for pv~e t:\l\a -SaJY\p}j eVOJ-1-_
PlA.r~t!. b5a.~ lA.t O~;2.D . Pv.r~d \J.)l!1l fOr 0.. +01(,1 of' 715 M:"V\+t:s_
"".t« ""~ c.k IV thr b",~o,,-t pw ~e . ?u.r~ ~ en J cA ~n J., .5A M pic. I,.)«.S e ./I.d. 01
oJ 1035. L..fl srtc ",1' 103~. DCl'th h ",,,,tel' ,,--th ,.-P"(~C ",a.S 113. ~I
L...-________ ..JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ)~~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Attachment 1 l (,~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I '0 v-\~ fV\OYvt}1~ G rO\..AflJ \l001.-tc.r .9.C 11
Location (well name):L-1 _N..--:.W_-_bS-=-________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I~nn~r HoJ],·Jo,.y/JJf
Date and Time for Purgin~ 7/5 / ~o I J and Sampling (if different) ,IV/A
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) QED
Sampling Event Mon+hl~ G-vJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... 1 __ A/_y_A _____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y.o
Specific ConductancelL---CJ.;",.C1_9 ___ -I/IlMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1.30.00
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ rag. 74
Conductance (avg) 1$33
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \5. bd.....
Weather Condo
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pHI
Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I I pH I
Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
Redox Potential (Eh) I ~g
4" well:1 '3Q ·Q7 1(·653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
6.bO
Turbidity I '-_L."'-'l"--_-J
Ext'l Amb. Temp .• ( (prior sampling event)/ ;)$6
I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
/ Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged [ gO. ';).q gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I .;;.1.1 7 T = 2V/Q = I 3f>8.3g I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labj '-_/V._~_:4 ______ ----l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100m! 0 ~ H2SO4 e1 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250m! 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m! 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ffi 0 Sample volume 0 [) 0 @
-'-1) S If preservative is used, specify
S\A\f~t-e. Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Ch\6'('~~~
Comment
l ,~~ See instruction
'---_______ ----l[Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC2
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
September 2011
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONI)~ ~ I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Se..ft,=W\bt.~ Gcov6"'WM~-r-' ;20\\
Location (well name): .... 1 M~:...;;.W_-_\.L.J\'----_______ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date and Time for Purgi ngJ OJ 17 I 2.0\ \
Well Purging Equip Used: [[]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I CI\ o"'t~"'1 (2 W
{
pH Buffer 7.0 I 7",0
Specific Conductancel"-tl..£......lq"-~.L...-_--'II-lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ gS, g.s
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) OtO
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .;v\ tJ --.3 tJ
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 13()
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:I 2-6 .. g7 1(·653h)
3" Well: (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 16,31../ I Redox Potential (Eh)1 1 J '3 Turbidity I Y I .. J
Weather Condo Ext'j Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 '20~ 1
Time I 1512. 1 Gal. Purged 1 53.5:I 1 Time I 1513 1 Gal. Purged I !;3.S1 1
Conductance I :2~ Ig 1 pH I 7..29 1 Conductance I 282Pr l pHI 7.30 1
Temp.oC I I 6 If 1.-1() I Temp.oC I 16H$9 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 123 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 120 1
Turbidity (NTU) I LlO.() 1 Turbidity (NTU) I ~1 t..l I
Time 11514 I Gal. Purged 1 5~."3 1 Time 11.515 1 Gal. Purged I 5~.~5 1
Conductance 1 2,g2]l pH I 7~29 I Conductance I 2g3~1 pH 1 7..:29 1
Temp.oC I 16« /3 I Temp.oC I 16 .. 25 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I II g I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Ijg: 1
Turbidity (NTU) I Ll2. 2 1 Turbidity (NTU) I WI). q I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I .5 Y. 2,5
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .2]7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two c ing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I ;?'u}7" 65 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) AlA
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated ,;VA
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~A~!~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals I5l 0 250ml r5l 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preserv ati ve:
r: . See instruction
Comment
A,.\vd 0"'-s,\·h:_ evt' 105g. Go..,.-,;V\.. ()... ....... A '-o..."",V\~('" 'P\e....{-e....1\.~ .yo, S6vM-p\i~
e.t/~1-~ f'V'f"5e... b~2>c..",-ev+ 1\t>.5, Wu-.-te.r Wo...$ C, Ie,t)...('" t \....rov.8iA.ou +-pl,)~e...
..so..M~ \ t..S ' ... ..) \6.e t:~ C. D \ I (...t...f c...J.. 0.-+ 15 15. LVe-.e.-Oe,f+~ +0 W~+~r o..f'te-r S~VV\.flt.....s w~("c-L.ol\~c.+c.A wo...s 8q .. JD~
L.'t!..f4-..si+!,.. ~1-1.s;20~
'-________ -JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of2 •
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ)J~I ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 r: I See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I S-'Le +-~V"" b~r 6f'"OvV\.J,..tA..,)c....+""r' 2 0\\
Sampler Name
Location (well name):1 .M LJ -) y and initials: [?I)-cr ·IIA. PuJ Mc;..r / 6 yJ
Date and Time for Purginm '" / g I 2. 0 I \ and Sampling (if different) LI N~:!..:A.!...-_____ -l
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!] pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I ;v\ QV\. tb \1 G W
pH Buffer 7.0 I 7.. 0
Specific ConductanceL-1 ~ql-g.a--q-'--__ -JIIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purginm 103.93 1
Conductance (avg) YDSq
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 ~Q:!I:-L-ELJ,JD-'--___ -J
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 16 W ..... 35
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 1 ~ gt7
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 16,,1 7
3" Well: ()
1(·653h)
(.367h)
pH of Water (avg) '--..... 6<.:.,_5..:...;2~ ___ ----'
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 /5, hI Redox Potential (Eh) I y 6 5 1 TurbidityL.,.I--l.,OL..-_--l
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling eventll 16 0
Time I 0937 1 Gal. Purged I 3:2.t 331 Time 1 093& I Gal. Purged 13.;2.55, I
Conductance I LJQhO I pH I 6.56 1 Conductance 1 !:lOS I 1 pHI 6 .. s~ 1
Temp. DC I 15.37 I Temp. DC I 1$.18 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I !d6S I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 45g I
Turbidity (NTU) I n I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 J
Time I 093Q I Gal. Purged I 5.2.:76 I Time l ogyO I Gal. Purged I 3 ;;Lq $. I
Conductance I ~(')b3 I pH I 6,$0 I Conductance I ~O.53 I pHI 6,50 I
Temp. DC I 15 t 1;2 I Temp. DC I 15v I g I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I L/52 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~LJb I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 32 .. 9 B
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60= I. ;2.)7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 'Y9~07 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I#A
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated INA
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labfl-..... d. .......... :4-1--______ -'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs D D 3x40 m! D D HCL D D
Nutrients D D 100m! D D H2SO4 D D
Heavy Metals D D 250m! D D HN03 D D
All Other Non Radiologies D D 250m! D D No Preserv. D D
Gross Alpha D D 1,000 m! D D HN03 D D
Other (specify) D D Sample volume D D D D
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
[-J See instruction
Arf"'\vt.cl £'11\. S;+e... 0... t-D705r b(;..("",,;,r.., (J...vvA 1~V\V\le:,.r 'P('c....>c.~t-~or .s~)'Y\.pt ; ~
a.v~1-. Pur-.3'C.-b~..,o..."", ()I...+ Olog. Uo-tG' WtAJ c...\~"".r +-l,..,rov5 I.Nov-t pLN"'~e.~
'D-e,...frt..-.. ~o wc...+~""" a...f+u--pvr~~ v;e-.-.> 101.1_ 30.
/Vb .sO-" ........ f'\~~ wt.;r-L. c..OI\t:..c..-+~cA. bc..c...c.....v..st::.. ~ie,..\c'-. Plt \..JA..$ A.l l i-1A.e....;-L....)c....,.,S
f"'c...tt,v· ... ~~"
Le,.ft site. tAt-Oqt....]b.
L.......... ________ ..... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ)~~I ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1 r _ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUNDWATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 5~? t c.k'Y> bc..r' L2 'CO \.Jlf\.cAtdlA.t U
Location (well name ):IL-...L/V\.....:......:....Iw::.=...._~ ...ti2~S..L..-_____ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date and Time for Purginm Of 17 1 ::l 0 \ \ and Sampling (if different) L...-oO:#~~--'-____ ----I
Well Purging Equip Used: [ID pump or@] bailer
Sampling Event 1,,/'/\ oV\.tk 1-..., v
pH Buffer 7.0 I "7" 0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _'1J...'1J...9.a-__ ....JI""MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 7 t.....J I 6 ~ I
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) LI-=:;Q~E,::..&.D..L-__ -....J
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .JV\ W -3 \
pH Buffer 4.0 y .. 0
Well Depth(O.Olft): I \ 15K 00
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 2tr:?~(.653h)
3" Well:, _ _ (.367h)
pH of Water (avg) L...-..&..6C..1",~5 ..... Y......l-___ ---'
Well Water Temp. (avg) I J 5~ Y Y 1 Redox Potential (Eh)1 253 I Turbidity I 2.3
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling eventll 17°
Time 1 \\07 I Gal. Purged I .5 2. 5~ I Time I 1\og I Gal. Purged I 52~]J I
Conductance 1 3~2} I pH I 6.55 I Conductance I 33231 pHI 6 .. 5 L\ I
Temp. DC I 15.51 1 Temp. DC I J5c.s I 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 253 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 25':?-1
Turbidity (NTU) I J .. "3 1 Turbidity (NTU) I 2 L\ I
Time I 11 09 1 Gal. Purged I 5~.~~ 1 Time I 1110 1 Gal. Purged 153. J6 1
Conductance I 33.26 1 pH 1 b,S4j 1 Conductance I 332s1 pHI 6.SY 1
Temp. DC I IS .. 3 7 1 Temp. DC I ]5.3A I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ;2L)3 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;;).,5 LI 1
Turbidity (NTU) I 2£2 1 Turbidity (NTU) I ..2, ---s 1
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 10f4
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 53" J 6 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I ,,2)]
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q=1 ?Y2.tQ !
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ! AlA
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated AIA'
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labll-...... /I~&,,*-=-_____ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mI 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mI 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250mI I5l 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 mI 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
A1"'t'\v !.A 0",," S ~ tt..-t1-+ O'OtJ. G"'-rr~"'" o...~ '-c..v\ll'l..e..i"" P'f.~!"""'{ f-or ('vI' ~'t-o...v..A Sp.."Mf ';
~\le.-.l'v+' f>()~~'!-. b-lJ!>~ ~ t 0 IOE.fOc e , \~A. Vo.-h ... r-~o....> c... \e..c.....(' + \.-.r'ovSk eov+
Pu r-~v . ..5t<-VV\.f l!-...5 t-ve.rt:,-t-.c'\ \ ~ ~'f,..tA ~ i-1\ \ Cl. O~f'+ k +t> t,.)c-. tf!.r o-..f'te.r
5(i4..VV\fl&,S '\.-Ve.j~ c..C"'6t-t'~A w>~..s 76. LAO, l.le..f+ Site... lJ-..;-\115.
'---________ ....... !DO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of4
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
, ATTACHMENT!
. OENISON') ~ i WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
'MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER -.--_.---~.---~ ----
Description of Sampling Event: ISc:.(Jtl.M .b~r 6'0 L>Ad--W c--..-r!--f" 20 \\
Location (well name):L..16,--~t.J=-_.j ..... 2-=.to.6'-______ -J
Sampler Name
and initials:
k See instruction
Date and Time for Pu rgi I1gJ q 17 I '20\ \ and Sampling (if different) L...-o;1/c....::....o:A~ _____ --'
Well Purging Equip Used: 00 pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I AoV\tt;Jy c;w
pH Buffer 7.0 I 7.. 0
Specific Conductance IL-g .... 9....a.-CJ.I.-_-----I1 IlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purginm 68.561
Conductance (avg) 3569
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gf"'vV\~f QS
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I /'/\ W --:3 1
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft): I J 21.331
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~----,Oo.L-_-I1 (.65 3h)
3" Well:. 0. .(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 15 ... 1\ Redox Potential eEh)1 36 S TurbiditYL-1 -...::.Q"""-------I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)1 \4 0
Time 1091:3 I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I 3569 I pHI 6.Jl I Conductance I I pH 1 1
Temp. DC I 16 .. \\ I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~5S I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I n I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
. Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of4
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 L.:M::":~~ ___ --J
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= 1 6. '3
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 .;VA 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labll-_N~~A-'--_____ --J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL !sa 0
Nutrients rg 0 100ml 0 lS H2SO4 ts 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml I5l 0 HN03 fil 0
All Other Non Radiologics I5l 0 250ml 0 fgI No Preserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 ml 0 [S HN03 lSi 0
Other (specify) rj 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
/--k \ 1"')_1""; rhL If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative: ,.oS
See instruction
" Comment
A ~ r" v ~tA. 0 \I\.. ~ i -r -c...-~ ~ t}... t-0 ~ 0 0" C; ~ t'r-~ IA. (}v.A, J... 'I ttJIv'\, ~ f-r~..s e.", 1-.f' or .5 o..MIp \;
t..\.I-t--\I\.t. 5~y.A..flt.'5 t..J~.r-'-c...-.c..~llv(...+~ ~+ OA\s~ Ov-.t.-St:..+ o~ fo...-r-~e..-h
W A.> +'0--"-' t:..I\, lit. + £/ C, I "3 _ ~ ~ + e.r t.J~.s c.-\ ~ t).. ('-',
-£:. 0 II'-t ~ V\. 0 V -' "v """'"P ; ~ tv t. \ I.
L-e.fi--"site-a..-} O'l'l2=t>.
OC,?-IJ
'--________ ..... IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 cf4
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
, f)ENISONI)~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ~-J See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: IS(!..f t c;..Mb"6r C:> rO\.).I"t\ L.Jc..± c...c 2 Q\ \
Sampler Name
Location (well name):! M\..J -.30 and initials: 0Q..ct'i)l\.. ~"r I 6f
Date and Time for Purgi ngj OJ 17 I 2Q \ \ and Sampling (if different) ~.A!:...::;...o::.A~ _____ -,
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer
Sampling Event !;V\ oll\.*'6.\y G W
pH Buffer 7.0 ! 7. 0
Specific Conductance! PI OJ 9 I~MHOS/cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 7 (,. 5 \
Conductance (avg) 1-1 -,,2~1-1 G--JI..Ioo6~ ___ -J
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L...I...!:G::::...JcE:.::::.;DIoc:-___ ....J
Prev. Well Sampled in Sampling Event I'!v\ w -3)
pH Buffer 4.0 H.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 \ , b
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ?oJ, Sb 1(·653h)
3" Well: (.367h)
6 .. 80
Well Water Temp. (avg) ! ]5.2Z I Redox Potential (Eh)1 282 TurbiditY .... 1 ---'0'--""-_----'
Weather Condo 5vV\.V\.y Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 17 b I
Time ! lOY:l-I Gal. Purged ! ~3 .. a3 I Time I 10Y3 I Gal. Purged I ~~.o5 1
Conductance I -:J...11d 5 I pH! be! 81 I Conductance I .:2 } l..j S I pH I 6r B2 I
Temp. DC I 15 •• Zg 1 Temp. DC I 15. 'J is 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 2~~ 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ::2 ~:2 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I lO LlY I Gal. Purged 1 yy" -;l6 1 Time 1 1045 1 Gal. Purged I ~!::L~g 1
Conductance 1 21!:ig I pHI 6. SO 1 Conductance I :2 ,l~g 1 pH 1 6.RO I
Temp. DC 1 15 .. 26 I Temp. DC I 1£,.31 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 :Lgl 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2~1 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 Q 1 Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I yt../ 1:1 S
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I .;2 17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I -;;2.0\.55 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) N.A
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab! ......... .4 ........ I LA .......... _____ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients Dt. 0 100ml 0 I:ia H2SO4 gJ 0
Heavy Metals IE. 0 250ml !Sf 0 HN03 ,gl 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
c..lA\()rirJ.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
Comment
[~;A See instruction
A ~f""·\V~J-. 0""-..s i tu e>-.. + 07' 6. Go.t"f"~"""" o.."",A -r'",-V\V\,Cor ff"-t....s,c..o/'v *' {Jo-f" ~&-."""~ ~ i V\.~
~v~-t'" Pvrbt-b~ ovt-0720. LJa.. t&r \.J()...> c.. ,~~, +-"'-r-ov~~ov+ f V '3{.;1
.5~lM.flt:...s wt:.rL.,. c..o\\-e...c-t~A tNt-101..-1.5. O-e....f1-'k to WIA.+~r c--fte..r' .$c..V'-\~\v.5
Wt:..r~ L.o'l~£..+~'\' IA./&...J 7Q.30.
L-~f".f ..s'+~ ~+-1050
L..... ________ ...JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Workslieet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)~ ~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1 r-See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I S-t::.pf"~h')be.r G-('O"'t')~ Wo-..'te r .?..() 1\
Location (well name):II-_M_W_-.....;:~::..;l ________ -..I
Sampler Name
and initials: ITu..one.f' H o/l:~o.,,=\/TH
Date and Time for PurgingJ ...... 9...:...&....1 b ...... /.....;;.:?-_O...;..;II'--___ ..... and Sampling (if different) pJ/ It ~~~-----.....
Well Purging Equip Used: [ff]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I Mon+hk1 Crw
pH Buffer 7.0 I.D
Specific Conductance .... 1 ----:9....:,'I....J.3 ___ ..... 1 !!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgind bg. ~S
Conductance (avg) L-----Ll ...... 4..;....lq.../....-____ -'
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IL-Q..:.-.;E-=D=---___ -'
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... 1_1'1_1_4 _____ -'
pH Buffer 4.0 L\.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): \30·00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 .39.93 1(·653h)
3" Well: () (.367h) '--~--.....
Well Water Temp. (avg) I lS::Y\ Redox Potential (Eh) I ttS ti Turbidity 1'--0=-_---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling eventl l 17!>
Time 11"'-':' C 0 --. ... -1 I Gal. Purged 17Cf.:;.o I Time 1 1 Cl C \ '..J f I
. I Gal. Purged 17q .42 I I~D.s J'-\D4,
Conductance I 11~O I pHI 7.6')., I Conductance 1 1'111 I pH 1 7-0.:3 I
Temp.oC I Is .YD I Temp.oC I IS ·:3, I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ~bY I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~5~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity CNTU) I a I
Time I ns.~'l . I Gal. Purged I 1~.fz;2 I ),-\07
Conductance I l~lg I pH 17.0:> I
Time 1 \-1")3 . I Gal. Purged 1 7'1,85 I . )--
Jl.jD~ I Conductance I 1~~() I pH 1 /.0.3
Temp.oC I Is.y! I Temp.oC I 15.3b I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I Cl:So I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :1~L{ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I go.2j
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I . :2.l7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 3bg .O;2.. I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L....:..;v,~V..:...'A-=--_____ --J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients m 0 100 ml D IX H2SO4 rii 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ri 0 lSi!
IDS If preservative is used, specify
~\j.'+o-t(
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
C. h \or\~e.
See instruction
Comment
A(("i\)~~ bn s~·h:. ~t 0/$,-\, \;.nYlf.r I).,l'l~ G-fA.(r,·1'l ?r~SC:Ylt -Nr f~r~c. o.n~ .s~MpL·nq event
fv..f~--e. b1:~CJ..n ~1' ogOO. 'PIA('~eJ. w~1I +or ~ +D+o.,l ot '370 lYl ·n\A+~.5. '.J
wo,:tef" IN~ d-eo.r '}hl"QU.~ blAt ?\Af~'-.. p lAr~-e. ~Y)detA ~-r +4t1 1 LiIO. ~Cfty"fle.J.
v..J~('(. C.Dne<..1-~~ <.'.t"' -l4Q. 111 J o. Depth 1-0 ~+<r \,..)CI~ i:l. J() .
L<...0-5,;+<=-41-ILl tS
L..-_______ -.JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Grcfundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)~ ~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 ..s~Oh: . .Mbe..r 6f"'ouV\.J.we....t~r-;;2.QI\
Location (well name ): ... 1 ,;V\'---"-"W:..----=3""'SoJ.-______ -'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 0t>xr .... ;V\, fev\W\e c I 6e
Date and Time for Purgind OJ 17 J 20' \ and Sampling (if different) L-...:M'-...:...:?1:......L. _____ ..J
Well Purging Equip Used: lID pump or@] bailer
Sampling Event 1 AoV\d: \'-"\1' r; t,..)
pH Buffer 7.0 1-1 _7~"-,,,O'--_----J
Specific ConductanceI-I _9-4-9...L-t1L-_...-.Jh.tMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 1 \ 2. '-'I Y 1
Conductance (avg) 16.5 5
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 --,Q.......,E.=<...L.D..J.-__ ...-.J
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ,/V\ W ..... ;2.5
pH Buffer 4.0 Y.D
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 7 h17 1(·653h)
3" Well:. _ .(.367h)
6,YS
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 IS. q7 1 Redox Potential eEh)1 :2. y g
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 ',,\0
Time 1 )237 1 Gal. Purged 1 15.62 1 Time I 1;2,38' 1 Gal. Purged I ]5. ~:l 1
Conductance I 16 .. 2 1 pH I 6. L./ 6 1 Conductance I 160l ~ 1 pH I 6.46 I
Temp. DC I Ib.DY I Temp. DC I I h" :21 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2~~ 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 2LJ~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I () I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I l;23'1 I Gal. Purged I 16 .. C!S 1 Time 1 l;2uo 1 Gal. Purged 1 16.~J I
Conductance 1 161~ I pH 1 6cYY 1 Conductance I 11,. ~ I pH I 6.Y2 I
Temp. DC 1 15,,67 1 Temp. DC I 15, q~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ~~7 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2~7 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 () I Turbidity (NTU) I CJ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I I o. 27
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ..;;z. 1 7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V IQ = I 7 'J.. 5 & I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) AlA
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated dA
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL..---""./\./.....::....iA~ _____ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 mI 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mI 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals [}I 0 250mI ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250mI 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 mI 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
A r.\vuA.. 0"",, ~i.rt.-~+ 1\2-0 .. 0a..1"'''''; V\. (}..V\,A 1c...V\.V\.~r' f;-f...,",~.I\. -t' f'c>r 5o-.W\'P ';Y'\-~ e.v~-t ~ fv('"3~ 'De-fl"v\' ~+-1\ U. LJiA.-te...r wo....s t:' t..o..r t ~~O(}b kOV + P Uf"~e.-I
5iAMple....s \.J~e.. c..olle..c..teo\. IR.+ I ;:2..L/O. De.ptk. +0 t->c<-+e.-r o.-p-ru-pvr-~(!J
w0-.5 113" 36.
L..~~ t SI tt:,. 0-..+ 1250,
L..-________ -IIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of Z
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONI) ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 5~etl....Mhc..r Gfou;;lwa....1-"t-r 20\ \
Location (well name) :1-.1 L-,IV\---L.:w=-----=:;6....::..5~ ______ ____'
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date and Time for Purging/ q J 7 I 20 \ \
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I MOot b \ Y 6 W
pH Buffer 7.0 I 7 ..... 0
Specific Conductance I q qq I!!MHOS/cm
Depth to Water Before Purginm 1} 2. t y y I
Conductance (avg) 16 .. 5.5
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I OE-D
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I ,!V\ vJ ...... ;2S
pH Buffer 4.0 H .. O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 J 2Y. 50
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 / g 7 1(·653h)
3" Well:.;' . (.367h)
pH of Water (avg) 6. y S
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 15 .. 9'7 I Redox Potential (Eh) I ;? L-i g I Turbidity I 0
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 I q~
Time I 1?-37 1 Gal. Purged I l-.5 t £.2 1 Time 1 12.3&'1 Gal. Purged 1 15.S~ 1
Conductance 1 11>.2 1 pH 1 6.Y6 1 Conductance 1 1~1:~ I pH 1 6. L/b I
Temp.oC I 16.oy I Temp.oC I 16.21 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;2~9 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2!dg I
Turbidity (NTU) I () I Turbidity (NTU) 1 () I
Time I 123<1 I Gal. Purged I 16. 1)5 I Time I 12HO I Gal. Purged I 16 ~/I
Conductance I l6.~ I pH I 6. L-J L.} I Conductance I 1613 I pH I £, W2 I
Temp.oC I 15,67 I Temp.oC I IS, q~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;;(~f2 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 2L.J7 I
Turbidity (NTU) I (') I Turbidity (NTU) I () I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 1 6, 27
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I .. 217
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 72,58 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) ./1/ A
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated ,/1/ A-
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-.....:~--.:....I1,---, _____ .....
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mi 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals IX 0 250ml ,rg 0 HN03 m 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservati ve:
See instruction
Comment
L-________ ...JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabD
Quarterl y Depth to Water
Static
Quarterly Depth to Water
NAME: Tanner Holliday, Garrin Palmer
DATE: 9/20/2011
TIME WELL level TIME WELL
Static
Level TIME WELL
829 MW-l 64.64 1213 MW-4 71.19 844 PIEZ-l
1246 MW-2 109.74 1209 TW4-1 64.45 840 PIEZ-2
1256 MW-3 83.33 1215 TW4-2 67.26 1156 PIEZ-3
1257 MW-3A 85.45 1204 TW4-3 49.53 1230 PIEZ-4
1322 MW-5 106.15 1220 TW4-4 73.01 1234 PIEZ-5
1326 MW-ll 88.65 1200 TW4-5 56.08
1319 MW-12 108.40 1223 TW4-6 70.41 1210 TWN-l
1330 MW-14 103.72 1211 TW4-7 67.61 1400 TWN-2
1333 MW-15 106.35 1207 TW4-8 66.77 1214 TWN-3
1252 MW-17 75.51 1202 TW4-9 54.07 1152 TWN-4
836 MW-18 70.25 1158 TW4-10 56.00 830 TWN-5
842 MW-19 51.84 1217 TW4-11 57.59 824 TWN-6
951 MW-20 87.29 1240 TW4-12 39.91 832 TWN-7
944 MW-22 67.20 1242 TW4-13 46.31 822 TWN-8
1251 MW-23 114.26 1245 TW4-14 87.32 847 TWN-9
1226 MW-24 114.45 1156 TW4-15 73.99 818 TWN-I0
1340 MW-25 74.56 1326 TW4-16 62.50 812 TWN-ll
1156 MW-26 73.99 1328 TW4-17 76.05 810 TWN-12
1221 MW-27 51.11 1207 TW4-18 56.57 848 TWN-13
1235 MW-28 76.88 1405 TW4-19 63.55 851 TWN-14
1242 MW-29 102.22 1154 TW4-20 81.03 816 TWN-15
1239 MW-30 76.35 1204 TW4-21 54.55 856 TWN-16
1333 MW-31 68.75 1152 TW4-22 53.94 855 TWN-17
1328 MW-32 76.05 1224 TW4-23 65.47 1148 TWN-18
1302 MW-33 dry 1150 TW4-24 55.64 807 TWN-19
1304 MW-34 107.80 1202 TW4-25 46.83
1255 MW-35 112.20 1227 TW4-26 64.09
1258 MW-36 110.30
1308 MW-37 109.24
Comments:
Static
Level
61.74
17.79
40.96
48.42
43.21
50.77
16.90
32.10
39.05
69.67
74.59
88.80
61.66
63.41
81.06
69.57
31.80
46.29
62.80
92.12
47.96
34.15
57.80
52.19
TIME
737
740
815
750
747
744
800
803
806
733
755
730
718
715
707
710
725
WELL Static Level
DR-l ABANDON
DR-2 ABANDON
DR-3 MW-36
DR-4 MW-37
DR-5 83.23
DR-6 94.41
DR-7 92.15
DR-8 51.11
DR-9 86.63
DR-I0 78.00
DR-ll 98.34
DR-12 87.19
DR-13 70.12
DR-14 76.49
DR-15 93.01
DR-16 ABANDON
DR-17 64.85
DR-18 ABANDON
DR-19 63.35
DR-20 55.91
DR-21 101.65
DR-22 DRY
DR-23 70.78
DR-24 43.88
DR-25 ABANDON
TabE
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
EI\ERGY
i\-!()f.hl ~I~I --.
www.energylab.com
AM/fIkM ~ SIIIu ,/lIZ
Helena, MT 817-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatt8, 'NY .1S-188-7175 · Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 • Collaga StatiDn, TX 888-610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-001
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Analyses
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (i)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
0.5
0.1
0.1
Units
pC ilL
pCi/L
pCilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Qualifier Rl
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/08/11 13:30
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E900.1 09/01/11 19:001 ep
E900.1 09/01/11 19:001 ep
E900.1 09/01/11 19:001 ep
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 38
EN:RGY
I\"'>"~'P,\I III • ...!'l
www.energylab.com
AM/ffIrM ExrdItIa smc. 1m
Heiflna, MT 871-412·0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY aal-235-0515
Gillattu, WY .88-888-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX aal-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-002
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Fluoride
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
0.96
46.0
Units
mg/L
ug/L
Qualifier RL
0.10
5.0
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/10/11 09:50
DateReceived: 08/12111
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-F C 08/15/11 11 :27 1 jba
E200.8 08/17/11 02:07 I sml
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 38
EN:RGY
"'~LJH .... 1 ::"'HI ')
Halena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735·4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888·188·7175 • Rapid City, so 888·672-1225 • College Station, 1X 881-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C 11080529-003
Client Sample 10: MW-3A
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
3560
5810
88.5
o -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/11/11 07:35
DateReceived: 08/12111
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0 50 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 16:52/1jl
0 17 A2540 C 08/12111 16:321 wc
5.0 E200.8 08/17/1102:121 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 38
EN:RGY
}\:-\OP/\! Of,l!l 'J
WIWI.energylab.com
AMIfI/a/~ Shu rItZ
Helena, MY 877-412-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY m-186-7115 • Rapid City, so 888-812-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Cl1080529-004
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
0.50 ug/l
Qualifier RL
0.30
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/09/11 11 :05
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 08/17/11 16;331 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7of38
Americall West
.,'AIYIIC41 10 Onl>TOA f.
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: 1108108-00lA
Client Sample ID: MW-ll
Collection Date: 8/3/2011 1025h
Received Date: 8/5/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/5/2011 13l4h
Units: !lg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 95.1
460-00-4 80-123 109
1868-53-7 80-124 96.1
2037-26-5 80-125 102
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 4 of29
All analysl.!s appJicable 10 Ihe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols PeTtinent sampling infomlalion is located on the attached CDC This report is provided fOT the exclusive usc orlhe addTl!ssec. Privileges of
subsequent use orlhe name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oFthis report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of Ihis report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only un contncl. This company accepts no responsibility except for (he due pcrronnancc of inspt!crion and/or analysis in good faith and according 10 the rult!S (if Ihe trade and of science
EI\ERGY
L, HCI J I \ 'Il.'·
www.energylab.com
AH/ftlt:M Ex~ SIne. 1/152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C 11080269-003
Client Sample 10: MW-11
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLlDES· DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
4
347
59.4
31
0.48
17.3
0.63
ND
6.6
628
1090
7.97
1940
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
226
NO
118
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
ND
0.48
NO
NO
1.1
0.7
Units
mg/l
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/l
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCilL
pCi/l
pC ill
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/03/11 10:25
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
A2320 B 08/05/11 18 :371 jba
A2320 B 08/05/11 18:37 1 jba
0.6 E200.7 08/15/11 13:271 cp
1 A4500-CI B 08/10/11 12:041 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12:20 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 13:271 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/11/11 14:35 1 dc
0.1 E353.2 08/08/11 13:051 dc
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 13:27 1 cp
0.9 E200.7 08/15/11 13:271 cp
20 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 15:44/1jl
0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 15:471 wc
10 A2540 C 08/05/11 17:22 1 Imc
5.0 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 07:45 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
25 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
30 E200.7 08/15/11 13:271 cp
1.0 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 07:45 1 sml
20 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
5.0 E200.8 08/09/11 07 :45 1 sm I
10 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 07:45 1 sml
100 E200.8 08/09/11 07:45 1 sml
0.30 E200.8 08/09/11 07:45 1 sml
15 E200.8 08/09/11 07:451 sml
10 E200.8 08/31/11 12:091 sml
E900.1 08/18/11 13:23 1 ep
E900.1 08/18/11 13:231 ep
E900.1 08/18/11 13:231 ep
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 5 of 35
EI\ERGY
_,'!:::3 .J!-J' I J -IE.
www.energylab.com
__ , Exun.nu SIIIU '952
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 816·&86·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/03/11 10:25
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
LablD:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080269-003
Client Sample ID: MW-11
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
4.03
29.4
31.9
2020
0.960
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
98.0
102
95.0
85.0
MCL!
Units Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
% Calculation 08/30/11 09:231 sdw
meqlL Calculation OB/30/11 09:23 I sdw
meqlL Calculation 08/30/11 09:23 I sdw
mg/L Calculation OB/30/11 09:23 I sdw
Calculation OB/30/11 09:23/ sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50 I ilr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 16 :50 / ilr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 08/0B/11 16:50 I ilr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50 I ilr
ug/L 20 SW8260B OB/08/11 16:50/ ilr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
%REC 80-120 SWB260B 08/08/11 16:50/ ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B OB/08/11 16:50 / ilr
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 35
EN:RGY
"-lO r~)'I ')PI :...
www.energylab.com
AMI!tfaI ExuIIaa stJw 1m
Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·135·4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-8515
Gillette, WY 816-886·7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 • College station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-005
Client Sample 10: MW-12
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
25.4 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
5.0
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/09/11 07:35
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date I By
E200.8 08/17/11 02:16/ sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 38
An'lf~rican West
ANAl VTIC/.l I AnORATonlFS
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1l08108-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-14
Collection Date: 8/3/2011
Received Date: 8/5/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: S/5/2011 1333h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor:
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-dS
1335h
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SWS260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 95.8
460-00-4 80-123 109
1868-53-7 80-124 97.1
2037-26-5 SO-125 101
Report Date: 8112/2011 Page 5 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonllalion is localed on thl! attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc oflhe addressee Privileges of
subsequent use oflhe nalUe of this company or nny member of its slafT. or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or !laIc of any product or process, or in connection with Ihc-re·publicalion of Ihis report [or any
purpose olher than for the addressee will be granted only on eonlacL 1llis c(lmpany accepts no responsibility except for the due pcr[onnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith nnd according to the rult.'S oflhe trade and of science
EN:RGY
L /18 Jr'1'Jd J'-·'IE..~,
www.energylab.com
AM/ffl§/ Ex"""," Sku 1/151
Helena, hfT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Caspar, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&·&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/01/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Collection Date: 08/03/11 13:35
Lab 10: Cl1080269-004 DateRecelved: 08/05/11
Client Sample 10: MW-14 Matrix: Aqueous
MCl!
Analyses Result Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 NO mg/L A2320 B 08/05/11 18 :45 / jba
Bicarbonate as HC03 449 mg/L A2320 B 08/05/11 18:45/ jba
Chloride 18 mg/L A4500-CI B 08/10/11 12:081 wc
Fluoride 0.15 mg/L 0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12 :27 1 jba
Sulfate 2210 mg/L D 50 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 15:49/1jl
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH 7.40 S.u. 0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 15 :56 1 wc
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 3560 mg/L 10 A2540 C 08/05/11 17:221 Imc
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5) 0.287 % Calculation 1 0/06111 16 :02 / sdw
Anions 53.8 meq/L Calculation 1 0/06/11 16 :02 / sdw
Cations 54.1 meq/L Calculation 1 0106/11 16 :02 / sdw
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated 3490 mg/L Calculation 10106/11 16:021 sdw
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20) 1.02 Calculation 10/06/11 16:021 sdw
. The Anion I Cation balance was calculated using the cation results from workorder Cll 090045.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes. Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
104
103
94.0
87.0
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 / jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17 :26 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 / jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 / jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:261 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 17 :26 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 / jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 / jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 / jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 17:26 1 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 35
EN:RGY
,\ ,. '\ I f II '_
www.energylab.com
AN/tflI;M ~ stc. '152
Helena, MT 817-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GlliaIta, WY 186-&88-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-172-1225 • College Station, TX 881-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 08/30/11 13:30
DateReceived: 09/01/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
C11090045-001
Client Sample 10: MW-14
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Calcium
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
506 mg/L
155 mg/L
NO mg/L
NO mg/L
12.2 mg/L
363 mg/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
1.63 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
1990 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
76.4 ug/L
NO ug/L
12 ug/L
0.5 pCilL
0.2 pCilL
0.2 pC ilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 14:49 1 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 14:491 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 09/02/1115:21/dc
0.1 E353.2 09/01/11 18:391 dc
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 14:491 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 14:49 1 cp
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 15:52 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/07/11 20:391 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 15:52 1 sml
25 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
30 E200.7 09/14/11 14:491 cp
1.0 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
20 E200.8 09/06/11 13:21 1 sml
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:52 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02 /11 15:52 1 sml
100 E200.8 09/02/11 15:52 1 sml
0.30 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
15 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:521 sml
E900.1 09/15/11 15:471 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 15:47 1 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 15:471 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant leve\.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 20
EN:RGY "
A ~CII..(.'\I U P I '-,
www.energylab.com
AMIftIcrI ER.JIMu SInu 1m HBkma, MT 811-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·135·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GlllattB, WY 811-186-7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-172-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-006
Client Sample ID: MW-18
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
1910
3190
4.00
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/10/11 14:20
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D 50 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 16:551 Ijl
10 A2540 C 08/12111 16:331 wc
0.50 E200.8 08/17/11 18:371 sml
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 38
EI\ERGY
, 1\·~uP/\t UHlc :...::.
Helons, MT 811-472-0711 • BIllings, MT BOD-735-4418 • casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, W'f 8&&-&8&-7115 • Rapid CilJ, SD 888-872-1225 • College Station, TX 888-610.2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11090914-001
Client Sample 10: MW-18
Analvses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -QuaUty control limit.
Result Units Qualifier Rl
0.50
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/21/11 15:00
DateReceived: 09/23/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date I By
E200.8 09/30/11 23:13{ 8ml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 8
EN:RGY
:....' B . I~ • I ) --Il J
www.energylab.com
~/w.n.-SInu '1151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Gasper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&8-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/04/11 07:45
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Cll080269-001
Client Sample 10: MW-24
Analyses
METALS· DISSOLVED
Cadmium
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
1.46
ND
MCll
Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
ug/L 0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 07:21 1 sml
ug/l 0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 07:21 I sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 35
American West
.... Nfli YTICAI I AnORATORtfS
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: 1108108-003A
Client Sample ID: MW-25
Collection Date: 8/3/2011 1045h
Received Date: 8/512011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/512011 1352h
Units: flg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CI5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 98.7
460-00-4 80-123 110
1868-53-7 80-124 97.8
2037-26-5 80-125 102
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 6 of29
All analyses applicable 10 Ihe CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfomlcd in acco~dancc (0 NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the att3ch~d CDC. This report is provided ror the exclusive usc oflhc addressee. Privileges of
subst!qucnl use oflhc n:IIU~ oflhis company or any member of il:;;: staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advcrtiscuu:nt. promotion or sale of tiny product or proccss; or in connection with thc re-publication of this report fur any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company ac(;epls no responsibility c,...cepl for the due perfomlance of inspc(;lion andlor analysis in good faith and according to the rulL'S of Ihe trade find of science
EN:RGY
_f,E:i!.'R/I :.->I L~
www.energylab.com
~/ExMIInuSinu 11152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, 'NY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 81&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1)( 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/01/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Collection Date: 08/03/11 10:45
Lab ID: C11080269-005 DateReceived: 08/05/11
Client Sample ID: MW-25 Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
Analyses Result Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L A2320 B 08/05/11 18:531 jba
Bicarbonate as HC03 382 mg/L A2320 B 08/05/11 18:531 jba
Chloride 32 mg/L A4500-CI B 08/10/1112:13/wc
Fluoride 0.31 mg/L 0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12:31 1 jba
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.41 mg/L 0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/11/11 14:391 dc
Nitrogen, Nitrat&+Nitrite as N ND mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/08/11 13:101 dc
Sulfate 1660 mg/L D 50 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 15:51 Iljl
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH 7.82 S.u. 0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 16:05 1 wc
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2830 mg/L 10 A2540 C 08/09/11 16 :04 1 wc
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5) 0.536 % Calculation 1 0106111 16 :03 1 sdw
Anions 41.7 meq/L Calculation 10106/11 16:031 sdw
Cations 42.2 meq/L Calculation 10106/11 16:031 sdw
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated 2700 mg/L Calculation 10106/11 16:031 sdw
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20) 1.05 Calculation 10106/11 16:031 sdw
-The Anion I Cation balance was calculated using the cation results from workorder C11 090045.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
101
95.0
85.0
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:021 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:021 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:021 ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:02/ ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:02 1 jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:02/ ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:021 ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:02/ jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:021 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:02/ ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:021 ilr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:02 / jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:021 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 18 :02 / ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 80f35
EI\ERGY
r\-~( I It. 11 -, III "
www.energylab.com
AMt1fIcII~ SIIu 1111
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 -Billings, MT 800-135-44811 -Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&-8BB-7175 -Rapid City, SD 888-112-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/07/11
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 08/30/11 10:45
DateReceived: 09/01/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
C 11090045-004
Client Sample 10: MW-25
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
367 mg/L
123 mg/l
9.8 mg/l
310 mg/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
1.19 ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
1330 ug/l
NO ug/l
12 ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
0.99 ug/l
NO ug/l
6.37 ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
0.6 pCi/l
0.2 pCi/l
0.2 pCi/l
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:131 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:131 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/1115:13/cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:131 cp
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :13 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
25 E200.8 09/06/11 13:531 sml
10 E200.8 09/06/11 13:531 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
30 E200.7 09/14/1115:13/cp
1.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
10 E200.8 09/06/11 13:531 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
20 E200.8 09/06/11 13:531 sml
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
100 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
0.30 E200.8 09/02/11 16:091 sml
15 E200.8 09/06/11 13:53 I sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:09 I sml
E900.1 09/15/11 17:56 I ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:56 I ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:56 I ep
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 20
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
American West
ANAl '(TICAl IltrtORATORlf ~
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108108-004A
Client Sample ID: MW-26
Collection Date: 8/312011
Received Date: 8/5/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/5/2011 1411h
Units: Ilg/L
0835h
0945h
463 West 3600 South Dilution Factor: 1
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Compound
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
109-99-9
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
1.00 < 1.00
77-144 101
80-123 107
80-124 101
80-125 101
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 7 of 29
All analyses applicable 10 the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infcm1l8tion is located on Iht! aUached COC This report is provided ror the exclusive usc orlhe addressee Privileges of
subsequent usc ofthe naUle of Ihis company df any member of it.o; 513ff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with Ihe advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc~publicalion of this report tor any
purpose other than for lhe addressee will be granted only On contact. This company accepts no responsibility excepl for the due pt:rfonnancc of inspedion and/or analysis in good faith and (lCcording to the rulC'S onhe trade and of science
EN:RGY
LI\BOHI\TO"~ILS
www.energylab.com
~/~SInu'952
Helena, PM 877-472-D711 • Billings, MTBOD-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/03/11 08:35
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C 11080269-006
Client Sample 10: MW-26
Analyses Result
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND
Bicarbonate as HC03 397
Chloride 60
Fluoride 0.27
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.27
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 0.6
Sulfate 1950
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH 7.72
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3190
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5) -1.75
Anions 48.8
Cations 47.1
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated 3090
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20) 1.03
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mglL
s.u.
mg/L
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
A2320 B 08/05/11 19:021 jba
A2320 B 08/05/11 19:02 1 jba
A4500-CI B 08/10/1112:16/wc
0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12:421 jba
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/11/11 14:41 1 dc
0.1 E353.2 08/08/11 13:121 dc
0 50 A4500-S04 E 08/22/11 15:591 Ijl
0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 16:131 wc
10 A2540 C 08/05/11 17:23 1 Imc
Calculation 10/06/11 16:041 sdw
Calculation 10/06/11 16:04 1 sdw
Calculation 1 0/06/11 16 :04 1 sdw
Calculation 10/06/11 16:041 sdw
Calculation 10/06/11 16:041 sdw
-The Anion I Cation balance was calculated using the cation results from workorder C11090045.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
NO
NO
ND
1000
NO
ND
10
NO
ND
NO
99.0
100
88.0
88.0
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:231 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 jlr
ug/L 0 100 SW8260B 08/09/11 06:471 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:231 ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 ilr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:231 ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:231 ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 07:23 1 ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 35
Er\ERGY
...... -'I --I ~ I I' ! ~:' "
www.energy1ab.com
Au/tfIcM~ .. 7m
Helena, flIT 177-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 818-188-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-112-1225 • Collage station, lX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/07/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
LablD: C 11090045-006
Client Sample ID: MW-26
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
482 mg/L
159 mg/L
10.7 mg/L
222 mg/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
1280 ug/L
NO ug/L
984 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
19.0 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
2.7 pCi/L
0.4 pCi/L
0.2 pCi/L
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 08/30/11 11:10
DateReceived: 09/01/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:291 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:291 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:291 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:291 cp
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/09/11 00:101 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
25 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :231 sml
10 E200.8 09/09/11 00:101 sml
10 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :23 1 sml
30 E200.7 09/14/11 15:291 cp
1.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
10 E200.8 09/09/11 00:101 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
20 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :231 sml
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:261 sml
100 E200.8 09/02/11 16 :26 1 sml
0.30 E200.8 09/06/11 13:591 sml
15 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :23 1 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:26 1 sml
E900.1 09/15/11 17:561 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:561 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:561 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of20
EI'ERGY
(\",LJf ~J\I OH'1 ~;
WWN.energylab.com
bI/JIII:Il fIuIIIncI SInu 1m
Helena, MT 871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4481 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 818-188-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 • CollegeStation,lX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-007
Client Sample 10: MW-27
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
43
6.0
424
1090
0.8
0.2
0.1
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/08/11 12:20
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
0
0
A4500-CI B 08/22/11 11 :44 1 wc
0.2 E353.2 08/16/11 14:26 1 dc
10 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 17:01 /Iii
10 A2540 C 08/12111 16:331 wc
E900.1 09/01/1119:00/ep
E900.1 09/01/11 19:001 ep
E900.1 09/01/11 19:001 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 10 of 38
EN:RGY
''\':-jOP/\I Oltl' ',.3.
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
www.energylab.com
__ /~SIIIu 'flU
Helena, MT 871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800·135·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 818-B81· 7175 • Rapid City, so 888·672·1225 • Conege Station, TX 888·690·221 8
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-008
Client Sample 10: MW-28
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/08/11 11 :20
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
105 mg/l
MCLt
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B 08/22111 11 :47 / wc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 38
EN:RGY
"hUP)·~I ',I~" J
www.energylab.com
AM/fIlI:I/ El1:I/IMa SInu 1m
Helen., tiT 871-472·0711 • BIllings, tiT 800-135-4489 · Casper, W'f 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-881·7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-009
Client Sample 10: MW-29
Analyses
METALS· DISSOLVED
Iron
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
1080 ug/l
Qualifier RL
30
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/09/11 09:45
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.7 09/13/11 14:06 1 cp
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 38
American West
III AI VTltd" t AAOKATORH.
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108108-005A
Client Sample ID: MW-30
Collection Date: 8/3/2011
Received Date: 8/5/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/5/2011 1508h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1445h
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CI5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 103
460-00-4 80-123 111
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 101
Report Date: 8112/2011 Page 8 of 29
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and ReRA are pcrfamed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling intbnnalion is located on the attached coe This report is provided for the exclusive usc orlh\! addrcsscc_ Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any ruember of its staff, or-reproduction of Ihis rcport in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report fl}f any
purpose othor than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, TIlis company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnancc of inspection andloT analysis in good faith and according to the rules orthe trade and of science
EN:RGY
L"r: :)Rr,I C~:It:.:
www.energylab.com
AMITIftMEz~." 1152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·135·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 8&6-&8&·1115 • Rapid City, SO 888·612·1225 • College Station, IX 888-690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C 11080269-007
Client Sample 10: MW-30
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
176
263
126
0.33
66.7
ND
14
6.8
102
768
7.98
1550
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
38
ND
27
ND
ND
ND
39.7
ND
ND
ND
8.00
ND
ND
1.1
0.7
1
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pC ilL
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/03/11 14:45
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
D
D
A2320 B 08/05/11 19:321 jba
A2320 B 08/05/11 19 :32 I jba
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 13:46 1 cp
1 A4500-CI B 08/10/11 12:291 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12:451 jba
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 13:46 1 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/11/11 14:431 dc
1 E353.2 08/08/11 13:151 dc
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 13:461 cp
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 13:461 cp
20 A4500-S04 E 08/22/11 16:04 I Ijl
0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 16:23 I wc
10 A2540 C 08/05/11 17:23 Ilmc
5.0 E200.8 08/09/11 08:05 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08:05 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08 :051 sml
25 E200.8 08/09/11 08 :051 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08 :051 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:05 I sml
30 E200.7 08/15/11 13:46 1 cp
1.0 E200.8 08/09/11 08 :05 1 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:05 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08 :051 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:05 I sml
20 E200.8 08/09/11 08:051 sml
5.0 E200.8 08/09/11 08 :051 sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:05 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08 :051 sml
100 E200.8 08/09/11 08:05 I sml
0.30 E200.8 08/09/11 OB:051 sml
15 E200.8 08/09/11 08:051 sml
10 E200.B 08/30/11 19:281 sml
E900.1 08/18/11 13:231 ep
E900.1 08/18111 13:231 ep
E900.1 08/18/11 13:231 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
P~ge 10 of 35
EN:RGY
_I I:..: _ r~ (I )'-1',_'
www.energylab.com
Anl/ffH2I EsN/IMu SbJa 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Stallon, IX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
LablD: C11080269-007
Client Sample 10: MW-30
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-0.516
23.4
23.2
1500
1.03
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
100
108
93.0
85.0
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/03/11 14:45
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
% Calculation 08/30/11 09:251 sdw
meq/L Calculation 08130/11 09:251 sdw
meq/L Calculation 08130/11 09 :25 1 sdw
mg/L Calculation 08/30/11 09:251 sdw
Calculation 08/30/11 09:251 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:38 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 18 :38 1 jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/08/11 18 :38 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:38 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 18:381 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 35
Arnerican West
ANAlYTICAl I AOOR.\TORlrS
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108108-006A
Client Sample ID: MW-31
Collection Date: 8/2/2011
Received Date: 8/5/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/5/2011 1527h
Units: j.1g/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
SUff: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluoroben zene
SUff: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1400h
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 104
460-00-4 80-123 113
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 101
Report Date: 8112/2011 Page 9 of29
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocol:;;. Pl,!rtincnt sampling infomlalion is located on the nUached cae This report is provided for Ihe exclusive usc oflhe addres.c;cc Privileges of
subsequent us!!' of the name of this company or1tny member of its starT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sate of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company neccpts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according La the rules of the trade and of science
EN:RGY
,-/\1;',--1 [1/\1 ':'G'IL!-
www.energylab.com
AHIftit2/ m.n.nu smc. 11152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-68&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11080269-008
Client Sample 10: MW-31
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
199
172
148
0.80
81.2
ND
20
5.7
95.3
537
7.80
1300
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
66.2
ND
ND
ND
7.68
ND
ND
0.5
0.6
0.9
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
S.u.
mg/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/L
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
ug/l
pCi/l
pC ill
pC ill
MDC -Minimum delectable concentration
U -Not detected at minimum deteclable concentration
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/02/11 14:00
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
D
D
U
A2320 B 08/05/11 19:40 I jba
A2320 B 08/05/11 19:40 I jba
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 14:02 I cp
A4500-CI B 08/10/11 12:30 I wc
0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12:50 I jba
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 14:02 I cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/11/11 14:45 I dc
1 E353.2 08/08/1113:171 dc
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 14:02 I cp
0.5 E200.7 08/15/11 14:02 I cp
10 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 16:09 I Ijl
0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 16 :35 I wc
10 A2540 C 08/05/11 17:24 Ilmc
5.0 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
25 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:101 sml
30 E200.7 08/15/11 14:02 I cp
1.0 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
20 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
5.0 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
10 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
100 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
0.30 E200.8 08/09/1108:10/sml
15 E200.8 08/09/11 08:10 I sml
10 E200.8 08/30/11 19:33 I sml
E900.1 08/18/11 15:31 I ep
E900.1 08/18/11 15:31 I ep
E900.1 08/18/11 15:31 I ep
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Page 12 of 35
EN:RGY
LABOHATO~"IES
www.energylab.com
AHIytIa/ En:MIfnu .. 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY B&6-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • CoUege Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/02/11 14:00
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C 11080269-008
Client Sample 10: MW-31
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (O.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-1.28
20.1
19.6
1240
1.05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
94.0
102
90.0
86.0
MCL!
Units Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
% Calculation 08/30/11 09:25 1 sdw
meq/L Calculation 08130/11 09:251 sdw
meq/L Calculation 08130/11 09:251 sdw
mg/L Calculation 08/30/11 09:251 sdw
Calculation 08/30/11 09:251 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:151 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 35
EN:RGY
") ',\1""1 '
www.energylab.com
AN/yIIaI~SIIIu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 8OD-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillatta, WV 888-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 08/30/11 13:05
DateReceived: 09/01/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
C11090045-002
Client Sample 10: MW-32
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
541 mg/L
231 mg/L
14.B mg/L
245 mg/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
0.94 ug/L
NO ug/L
40 ug/L
NO ug/l
5400 ug/L
NO ug/L
5250 ug/L
NO ug/L
11 ug/L
47 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
2.39 ug/l
NO ug/L
72 ug/L
1.9 pCilL
0.3 pCi/L
0.2 pCi/L
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:05 1 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:051 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:051 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:051 cp
5.0 E200.B 09/02/11 15:541 sml
0.50 E200.B 09/07/11 21 :04 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/06/11 13:241 sml
25 E200.8 09/02/11 15:541 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:54 1 sml
10 E200.B 09/02/11 15 :541 sml
30 E200.7 09/14/11 15:051 cp
1.0 E200.B 09/02/11 15:54 1 sml
10 E200.B 09/02/11 15:541 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 15:541 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:54 1 sml
20 E200.B 09/06/1113:24 /sml
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 15:541 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:541 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 15:541 sml
100 E200.8 09/02/11 15:541 sml
0.30 E200.B 09/06/11 13 :241 sml
15 E200.8 09/02/11 15:541 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 15:54 1 sml
E900.1 09/15/11 15:47 1 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 15:47 1 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 15:471 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 20
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
American West
A,,-At'lTIC/d I AnOAAT0RlfS
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: 1108108-007A
Client Sample ID: MW-35
Collection Date: 8/2/20 II 1430h
Received Date: 8/512011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/512011 1546h
Units: Ilg/L
0945h
463 West 3600 South Dilution Factor: 1
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Compound
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual -------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
109-99-9
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
1.00 < 1.00
77-144 106
80-123 111
80-124 102
80-125 101
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 10 of29
All analyst!s applicable to the CWA, SOWA. and RCRA arc pcrfomlcd in accordance to NELAC protocols. P~rlinent sampling infonnalion is located on the attachcd CDC This report is providc~ for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc uflhe name of this company or any member of its starr, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, Or1" connection wilh the rc~publication of this report for any
purpose olher fhan for the addrcsset: will be granted only on contact TIl is company accepts no responsibility except for tilt;: due pcrfonnancc of inspL!ction and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of Ihe trade and of scicnce~
EI\ERGY
_,\Ii.LJR"l'.'irl-_C'
www.energylab.com
~/m.n.nuSlnu 11151
Helena, MT877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 . Rapid City, SO 888-&12-1225 · College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/01/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Collection Date: 08/02/11 14:30
Lab 10: C 11080269-009 DateReceived: 08/05/11
Client Sample 10: MW-35 Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/l A2320 B 08/05/11 20:051 jba
Bicarbonate as HC03 394 mg/l A2320 B 08/05/11 20:05 I jba
Chloride 59 mg/l A4500-CI B 08/10/11 12:33 I wc
Fluoride 0.37 mg/l 0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12:531 jba
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.05 mg/l 0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/11/11 14:47 I dc
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/l 0.1 E353.2 08/08/11 13:20 I dc
Sulfate 2330 mg/L D 50 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 16:15/1j1
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH 7.84 S.u. 0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 16:451 wc
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3720 mg/L D 11 A2540 C 08/05/11 17:24/1mc
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5) 0.555 % Calculation 10/06/11 16:051 sdw
Anions 56.7 meq/L Calculation 10/06/11 16:051 sdw
Cations 57.3 meq/L Calculation 10/06/11 16:05 I sdw
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated 3720 mg/L Calculation 1 0/06/11 16 :05 I sdw
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20) 1.00 Calculation 10/06/11 16:051 sdw
-The Anion I Cation balance was calculated using the cation results from workorder C11 090045.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
99.0
103
92.0
85.0
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 I jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 I jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 I jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19 :51 I jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 I jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 19 :51 I jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/08/11 19:51 1 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 14 of 35
www.energylab.com
AMIytk:M E1&tn.-SlR" 1m Helena, MT 877-412·0111 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, W'( 188-888-7115 • Rapid City, SD 188-172-1225 • Colluge Siallon, TX 888-880-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Lab ID: C11090045-005
Client Sample ID: MW-35
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
524 mg/L
155 mg/L
11.6 mg/L
416 mg/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
207 ug/L
NO ug/L
267 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
9.3 ug/L
NO ug/L
0.52 ug/L
NO ug/L
18.3 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
4.5 pCi/L
0.5 pC ilL
0.2 pC ilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 08/30/11 14:35
DateReceived: 09/01 Iii
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:171 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:17 1 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/1115:17 /cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/1115:17/cp
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :18 I sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 1 sml
25 E200.8 09/07/1121 :18/sml
10 E200.8 09/07/1121:18 /sml
10 E200.8 09/06/11 13:561 sml
30 E200.7 09/14/11 15:17 /cp
1.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 I sml
10 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :18 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:231 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 I sml
20 E200.8 09/06/11 13:56 I sml
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:231 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 I sml
0.50 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 I sml
100 E200.8 09/02/1 1 16 :23 I sml
0.30 E200.8 09/06/11 13:561 sml
15 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 1 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:23 I sml
E900.1 09/15/11 17:56 1 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:561 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:561 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7of20
t, (; I, I y f .: I, I I. 'i~) ~.\ r ,'I n I J
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 20 II
Lab Sample ID: 1108246-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-36
Collection Date: 8/9/2011 1150h
Received Date: 811212011 0935h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8112/2011 1326h
Units: )lg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofirran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GCIMS Method 8260CI5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 l.00 < l.00
17060-07-0 77-144 109
460-00-4 80-123 111
1868-53-7 80-124 104
2037-26-5 80-125 98.9
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 4 of 17
All analyses applicablc 10 the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA an~ perfomlcd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infomHHion is located on (hI;! aHttchcd cae. This repon is provided for the cx:ciusivc use of the addressee. Privi1t~gcs of
subsequent use oflh~ nalne orchis company or any member orits staff, or reproduction of this repon in connection with the advcrtisemellt. promotion or sale of any product or.process. or in connection with the re·publicalion oflhis report-for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This cOlilpany accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnancc of inspcclion andlor allalysis in good faith and Recording fo the rulcs of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY .,
:\l..,UI~,'\l:..,)'JI ~, .. www.energylab.com
AM/ffIrM Em/IMu .. '151 Hulena, MT 871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800·135·4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatte, WY 816-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&12·1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11080529-010
Client Sample 10: MW-36
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
340
445
54
0.33
136
ND
0.2
9.8
716
2740
7.66
4320
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
229
NO
0.84
ND
23.9
NO
35
0.3
0.1
0.1
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pC ilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/09/11 11 :50
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MeL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
D
A2320 B 08/12111 20:181 jba
1 A2320 B 08/12111 20:181 jba
0.6 E200.7 08/18/1115:19/cp
1 A4500-CI B 08/22/11 12:01 1 wc
0.10 A4500-F C 08/15/11 11 :30 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 08/18/11 15: 19 1 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/15/11 12:471 dc
0.1 E353.2 08/16/11 14:29 1 dc
0.5 E200.7 08/18/1115:19/cp
0.9 E200.7 08/18/1115:19/cp
50 A4500-S04 E 08/22/11 17:05 I Ijl
0.01 A4500-H B 08/1211115:17/wc
13 A2540 C 08/12/11 16:341 wc
5.0 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/18/11 22:191 sml
0.50 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
25 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 I sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 18:421 sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
30 E200.7 08/18/11 15:191 cp
1.0 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :081 sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 I sml
20 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
5.0 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :081 sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 I sml
100 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 I sml
0.30 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
15 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :08 1 sml
E900.1 09/01/11 19:001 ep
E900.1 09/01/1119:00/ep
E900.1 09/01/11 19:001 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 13 of 38
EN:RGY
i\-,OI·AfOHI "
www.energylab.com
AM/ffIaI Em/IwII:I SII!u 1/152
Helens, MT 871-412-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 816-186-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11 080529-01 0
Client Sample 10: MW-36
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
0.494
64.2
64.8
4290
1.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
108
113
126
94.0
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/09/11 11 :50
DateRecelved: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 09/13/11 13 :20 1 sdw
Calculation 09113/11 13:201 sdw
Calculation 09113/11 13 :201 sdw
Calculation 09/13/11 13 :201 sdw
Calculation 09/13/11 13 :20 1 sdw
20 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16 :481 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16 :481 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:48 1 jlr
20 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16 :48 1 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:48 1 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
70-130 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:48 1 jlr
S 80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 16:481 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 14 of 38
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
3 rd Quarter Ground Water 20 II
1I08246-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-37
A'''''T''''" tA"""ATOR '" Collection Date: 8/11/2011 0815h
Received Date: 8/12/2011 0935h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/1212011 1345h
Units: Jlg/L
463 West 3600 South Dilution Factor: 1
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Compound
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual -------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (80 I) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Tetrahydrofuran
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
109-99-9
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
1.00 < 1.00
77-144 110
80-123 III
80-124 104
80-125 99.2
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 5 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are pcrfomlcd in accordance to. NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infom131ion is located on the attached COCo This Tt!port is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent usc oflhc name ofthi5 company or any member of its staff. or reproduction ofthi.s report"in conneclion with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in conneclion with the re·publication of this report for any
purpose other than For the addressee will be granted only on contact. ntis company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfomlancc of inspection andlor analysis in good faith and according to the rules of Ihe trndc and of science.
EI'ERGY
_1\::-H.)IU d OPI~ :.;
WMY.energyiab.com
AM/fIIaI~SIIJu ltil
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 881-888-7115 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • Colloge StatiDn, 1)( 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11080529-011
Client Sample 10: MW-37
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
291
457
55
0.30
129
ND
2.3
13.9
556
2440
7.53
3820
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
115
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
18.1
ND
45
0.6
0.1
0.1
Units
mglL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mglL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
s.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/11/1108:15
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
D
D
D
D
A2320 B 08/12/11 20:261 jba
A2320 B 08/12111 20:26 I jba
0.6 E200.7 08/18/11 15:231 cp
A4500-CI B 08/22111 12:03 I we
0.10 A4500-F C 08/1 5111 11 :32 I jba
0.5 E200.7 08/18111 15:23 I cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/15/11 12:49 I dc
0.1 E353.2 08/16/11 14:31 I dc
0.5 E200.7 08/18/11 15:23 I cp
0.9 E200.7 08/18/11 15:23 I cp
50 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 17:06 I Ijl
0.01 A4500-H B 08/12111 15:21 I wc
11 A2540 C 08/12111 16:34 I wc
5.0 E200.8 08/17/1101 :13/sml
0.50 E200.8 08/18/11 22:24 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/17/1101 :13/sml
25 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :13 I sml
10 E200.8 08/17/1118:461 sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :13 I sml
30 E200.7 08/18/11 15:23 I cp
1.0 E200.8 08/18/11 22:24 I sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :13 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/18/11 22:24 I sml
10 E200.8 08/17/1101 :13/sml
20 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :13 I sml
5.0 E200.8 08/17/1101 :13/sml
10 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :13 I sml
0.50 E200.8 08/18/11 22:24 I sml
100 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :13 I sml
0.30 E200.8 08/18/11 22 :241 sml
15 E200.8 08/17/11 01 :13 I sml
10 E200.8 08/17/1101 :131 sml
E900.1 09/01 /11 19:00 I ep
E900.1 09/01/11 19:00 I ep
E900.1 09/01/11 19:00 I ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 15 of 38
EN:RGY
;,\:-::.u,,",,/\I : .. JHI '.
www.energylab.com
~ExWIMt:s "'lSI Helena, MT 811-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 816-181-1175 • Rapid City, so 888-672-1 m • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANAL YTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11080529-011
Client Sample 10: MW-37
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1.2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
0.562
57.3
58.0
3820
1.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
114
128
129
94.0
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/11/1108:15
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 09/13/11 13:21 1 sdw
Calculation 09/13/11 13:21 1 sdw
Calculation 09113/11 13:21 1 sdw
Calculation 09/13/11 13:21 1 sdw
Calculation 09/13/11 13:21 1 sdw
20 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:23 1 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:23 1 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:231 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:231 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:231 jlr
20 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:23 1 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:231 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:231 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:231 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:23 1 jlr
80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:231 jlr
70-130 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:23 1 jlr
S 80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:23 1 jlr
80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:23 1 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 38
American West
AU AI '(TICI.l I A IiORATORlfS
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1l08108-008A
Client Sample ID: MW-65
Collection Date: 8/3/2011
Received Date: 8/5/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/5/2011 1605h
Units: )lg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
0835h
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 106
460-00-4 80-123 109
1868-53-7 80-124 105
2037-26-5 80-125 98.8
Report Date: 8112/2011 Page 11 of29
All analySt!s applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrrom1(~d in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling intonnalion is located on the attached C.OC This report is provided for thl! c)(clusivc us!.: ofthc addressee Privileges of
:;ubs,,"qucnl use of the name oflhis company or any member ofil .. staff. or reproduction offhis report in connection with Ihe advertisement. promotion or sale o(·nny producl or process, or iu connection with the fe-publication oflhis report for any
purpose olher than for the addressee will be granted only on contact-This company tlc(;cpls no responsibility except for the duc perfonnance of inspection andlor 3n:llysis in good faith and according to thc ruk-s oftht: trade and of science.
EN:RGY
L , l~ _)~~J~ I " Il:._
www.energylab.com
~/~SInu 11152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/01/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Collection Date: 08/03/11 08:35
Lab 10: C11 080269-01 0 DateReceived: 08/05/11
Client Sample 10: MW-65 Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Analyses Result Units Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L A2320 B 08/05/11 20: 13 I jba
Bicarbonate as HC03 389 mg/L A2320 B 08/05/11 20: 13 I jba
Chloride 57 mg/L A4500-CI B 08/2211111:18/wc
Fluoride 0.26 mg/L 0.10 A4500-F C 08/08/11 12:56 I jba
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 0.27 mg/L 0.05 A4500-NH3 G 08/11/11 14:491 dc
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 0.6 mg/L 0.1 E353.2 08/08/11 13 :22 I dc
Sulfate 1950 mglL D 50' A4500-S04 E 08/22111 16:17/1jl
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH 7.74 S.u. 0.01 A4500-H B 08/05/11 16:541 wc
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3180 mg/L 10 A2540 C 08/05/11 17:25 Ilmc
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5) -1.32 % Calculation 10106/11 16:061 sdw
Anions 48.5 meq/L Calculation 1 0/06111 16 :06 I sdw
Cations 47.3 meq/L Calculation 1 0/06/11 16 :06 I sdw
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated 3090 mg/L Calculation 1 0106/11 16 :06 I sdw
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20) 1.03 Calculation 10/06/11 16:061 sdw
-The Anion I Cation balance was calculated using the cation resu~s from workorder C11090045.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
ND
ND
ND
1100
ND
ND
12
ND
ND
ND
97.0
109
86.0
86.0
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/09/11 00:421 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 00:42 I jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 06/09/11 00:42/ jlr
ug/L D 50 SW8260B 08/10/11 15:07/ jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 00:42/ jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/09/11 00:42 / jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 00:42/ jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 00 :42 / jll
ug/L 1.0 SW6260B 06/09/11 00 :42 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW6260B 08/09/11 00:42 1 jll
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 00 :421 jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 06/09/11 00:42/ jlr
%REC 60-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 00 :421 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 00 :421 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 15 of 35
EN:RGY
• ./. I " ' •
www.energylab.com
~~ShlU'm
Helena, MT 817-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-44" • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillette, WV 888-886-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • eollegeSlation, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Lab 10: C11090045-003
Client Sample 10: MW-65
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±l
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
493 mg/L
159 mg/L
10.6 mg/L
214 mg/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
10 ug/L
1210 ug/L
NO ug/L
971 ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
2S.2 ug/L
NO ug/L
11 ug/L
2.5 pCi/L
0.4 pCilL
0.2 pCilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 08/30/11 11:10
DateReceived: 09/01/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:091 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15 :09 1 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15 :091 cp
0.5 E200.7 09/14/11 15:091 cp
5.0 E200.8 09/02/11 16:061 sml
0.50 E200.8 09/07/11 21 :OS 1 sml
0.50 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
25 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
10 E200.8 09/02/11 16:061 sml
10 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
30 E200.7 09/14/11 15:091 cp
1.0 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
10 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
0.50 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
10 E200.S 09/02/11 16 :06 1 sm I
20 E200.S 09/06/11 13:27 1 sml
5.0 E200.S 09/02111 16:06 1 sml
10 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
0.50 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
100 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
0.30 E200.S 09/02/11 16:06 1 sml
15 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
10 E200.S 09/02/11 16:061 sml
E900.1 09/15/11 15:471 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 15:471 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 15:471 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 20
EN:RGY
1\,-tOt li\('.:JI /I' "_,
www.energylab.com
A/IIIfIIaI ExrMIwIu .. IIIfZ
Helena, 1M 811-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 886-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11090914-002
Client Sample ID: MW-70
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Thaiiium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
3.47 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
0.50
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/21/11 15:00
DateReceived: 09/23/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 09/27/11 07:471 sml
Mel -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 8
EI\ERGY
1\ 7\{.Hu\1 ,-' 11 '~
www.energylab.com
AM/fIIaI ~ SIIJu 1112
Helena, MT 871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillette, WY 81B-IBI-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-612-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-6S0-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-012
Client Sample 10: MW-70
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
1910
3220
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/l
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/10/11 14:20
DateRecelved: 08/12111
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date / By
D 50 A4500-S04 E 08/22111 17:13 I ljl
10 A2540 C 08/12/11 16:34/ wc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 17 of 38
Arneric.an West
AUAl 'i TlC/d I AnOI=fATORlfS
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108108-009A
Client Sample ill: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 8/2/2011
Received Date: 8/512011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/5/2011 1624h
Units: fJ.g/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 107
460-00-4 80-123 111
1868-53-7 80-124 103
2037-26-5 80-125 101
Report Date: 8112/2011 Page 12 of29
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SOWA. find RCRA ore performed in accordam.:e fo NELAC protocols, Pt!rtincnl sampling infonnalion i;> located on the attached CDC This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee Privileges of
subsl!qucnt usc ofthc name of this company or any member of ils staff, or reproduction of this Teport in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sate of any product or process, or in-connection wilh Ihe rc-publicalion of this report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will b\! granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for thl.: due performance of inspection and/ur analysis in good failh and according to the rules of the trade and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108246-004A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 8/9/2011
Received Date: 8112/2011 0935h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 8/1212011 1404h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CI5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 113
460-00-4 80-123 110
1868-53-7 80-124 108
2037-26-5 80-125 99.1
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 6 of 17
All analyses applicable to the: CWA, SOW A, and RCRA are pcrfomlcd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infom13tion is located on the attached cae This report is provided for the exclusive usc arthc addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use orltic name of this company or any member ofils sLaff, or reproduction of this report in connection with th\! l1dvertlscmcnl. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in conneclion with the re-publication of this report for'any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for thl! due pcrfomlancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
,_ ,\t-' }:./'I I ): :tr..~.
www.energylab.com
Aulfllt:.I~ShIu 1m
Helena, MT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Gaspar, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&6-186-7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10106/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080269-011
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank 6092
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
102
105
90.0
86.0
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: 08/03/11
DateRecelved: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Units Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
uglL 20 SW8260B 08/09111 01 :18 1 ilr
uglL 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 1 ilr
uglL 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :181 ilr
uglL 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 / ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09111 01 :18 1 ilr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 / ilr
uglL 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 01: 18 / ilr
uglL 1.0 SW8260B 08109111 01 :18 / ilr
uglL 1.0 SW8260B 08109/11 01 :18 1 ilr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 / ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 / ilr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 1 ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 1 ilr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 08/09/11 01 :18 / ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 35
EN:RGY
:···\OI:(/\'?lHII,--)
www.energylab.com
AM/fIkII~SInu 11M
Helena, MY 871-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, so 88B-&72-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Cll080529-013
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank (6092)
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: l,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
109
101
122
94.0
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: 08/09/11
DateReceived: 08/12/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
20 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:581 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17 :58 I jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 I jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 I jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:581 jlr
20 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 I jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 I jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:581 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:581 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 / jlr
80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 I jlr
70-130 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 I jlr
S 80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 / jlr
80-120 SW8260B 08/18/11 17:58 / jlr
MCL - Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 18 of 38
EI'J:RGY
J'. nHl\/CI .... ' "
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
www.energylab.com
AIIIIytftM £zuIIIM:iI SIIru 1152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Bllllnp. MJ HI·J31-44" • Casper, WY .11·235·0515
Gillette, W'f 866·688·7115 • Rapid City, sp ••• ·112-1228 • College Station, TX .8.·810-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Cll090045-007
Client Sample 10: Temp Blank
Revised Date: 10/07/11
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 08/30/11
DateReceived: 09/01/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.3
MCU
Qualifier RL QCl Method Analysis Date I By
E170.1 09/01/11 09:10 I kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 20
EN:RGY
:\-UI-(/\I ': J..tE ~
www.energylab.com
bIJy/kIJ &uIIMu stllU list
Heiena, MT 871-472-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillatte, WY 11&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 118-872-1225 • CGllege station, TX 888-610-2211
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11090914-003
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.4
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 09/21/11
DateReceived: 09/23/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E170.1 09/23/11 09:20 1 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 8
EI\ERGY
L' 8,)1.( I J"tL '
www.energylab.com
~/m.n.nuS/nu 'flU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WV 8&&-&86-7175 · Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 . College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Collection Date: Not Provided
DateReceived: 08/05/11
Matrix: Aqueous
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080269-012
Client Sample 10: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
4.2
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E170.1 08/05/11 09:10/ kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 17 of 35
EN:RGY
i'\'~.OI~'\I:..~fJI 'J
WWN.energylab.com
~~stna'§1
Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-135-44811 • Casper, WY 888-235-8515
Gillette, WY 8BB·686· 7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11080529-014
Client Sample 10: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.9
Qualifier Rl
Report Date: 09/14/11
Collection Date: Not Provided
DateReceived: 08/12111
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date I By
E170.1 08/12/11 09:05 1 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 19 of 38
AUhl "TICAl I AI',O nAT0ntr s
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
Denver, CO 80265
TEL: [phone]
RE: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1108108
American West Analytical Laboratories received 9 sample(s) on 8/5/2011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado, Idaho, and Missouri.
Certification document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns
regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, andlor
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Digitally signed by Jose G.
J 0 S e G ~~~~~=Jose G. Rocha.
• o=American West Analytical
Laboralories, ou=Qualily
Assurance Officer, Roc h a ~:;'~~=[e-mail].
Date: 2011.08.1216:44:29
-06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 1 of29
All analyses applicable 10 the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnRlion is located on Ihe attached cac. This report is provided for the exclusive us~ of the addressee.. Privilegl.!s of
subsequent use of the name of thiS company or any member of Its staff, or rCI)rodUl.:lion orthi~ report In conneclion with the adverlisemcnt, promotion or sale of any product or plllCCSS, or in connection with the re-publication of.his report for any
pUlpOSC olher than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This cUJUpany accepts 110 responsibility I.:xccpl for the dUl: pt!rfonnancc ofinspeclmn and/or analysis in good faith and according 10 the ruh.:s of file lrade and of science
SAMPLE SUMMARY
American West Client: Denison Mines Contact: 10 Ann Tischler
ANAl .... TICAl I AflOAATORlfS Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Lab Set ID: 1108108
Date Received: 8/S/2011 094Sh
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected Matrix Analysis
463 West 3600 South
1108108-00lA MW-ll 8/3/2011 102Sh Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
Salt Lake City, UT 84l1S 8260C/S030C
1108108-002A MW-14 8/3/2011 133Sh Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/S030C
1108108-003A MW-25 8/3/2011 104Sh Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
Phone: (80 l) 263-8686 8260C/S030C
Toll Free: [phone] 1l08108-004A MW-26 8/3/2011 0835h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
Fax: (80 l) 263-8687 1108108-00SA MW-30 8/3/2011
8260C/S030C
144Sh Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
e-mail: [e-mail] 8260C/5030C
1l08108-006A MW-31 8/2/2011 1400h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
web: www.awal-Iabs.com 8260C/S030C
1108108-007 A MW-35 8/2/2011 1430h Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
1108108-008A MW-65 8/3/2011 0835h Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method Kyle F. Gross 8260C/S030C
Laboratory Director 1108108-009A Trip Blank 8/2/2011 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/S030C
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Report Date: 8/1212011 Page 2 of29
All analyses applic~ble La the CWA, SDWA. and ReRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance 10 NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infomlBlion is locat~d on the attached COc. This report is; provided for the exclusive usu of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name oflhis company or any membc:r of its srntT. or reproduction aflhis report in conneclion with the advertisement promotion or sale araoy product or process, OT in connection with the fe-publication or this report ror any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. Tllis company accepts no responsibility excepl for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of lhe trade and of science
t'.Hl!~ri['i'\! IN',,:::-,\..
IINhlVTICAI I AflOn6.TORII £;
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, VT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108108
8/5/2011
8/2 & 8/3/2011
Intact
None
SW-8468260C/5030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 3 of 29
All analyses applicable 10 Ihe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA arc perfOmh!d in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infomlalion is located on the attaclh:d COc. This report is provideu for tht! exclusive usc ufthc addressee Privilcgc.:s of
subsequent usc oflhc name oflhis company or any mcmb~r ofils stafT. or reproduction oflhis report in conneclion with the advertisen1l!nt. promotion or sale or any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oFthis report tor noy
purpo);c othcr than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, n.is compauy accepts no r~sponsibilily except for the due pcrfonllancc of inspection and/or analysis in good failh and accllrding to the rules of the trade and of scicnce
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1108108
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC OS0511A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC OS0511A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC OS0511A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC OS0511A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC OS0511A Surr: To1uene-dS
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (SOl) 263-8686, ToIl Free: (SS8) 263-86S6, Fax: (801) 263-S687
Units
~g/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
OC SUMMABXJU~PORJ
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260C 15.2 20.00
SW8260C 44.7 50.00
SW8260C 51.4 50.00
SW8260C 47.6 50.00
SW8260C 50.0 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Original
Amount %REC Limits
0 75.8 43-146
89.5 69-132
103 85-118
95.1 SO-120
100 Sl-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
S/5/2011 121Sh
S/5/2011 121Sh
8/5/2011 1218h
S/5/2011 121Sh
S/5/2011 121Sh
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 13 of29
All analyses applicable to the CWA~ SDWA. and ReRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use afthe name of this company or any
member of its staft~ or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
ANALVTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1108108
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 0805l1A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 080511A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 080511A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 080511A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 080511A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Units
ILgiL
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
~c SUMMAR'Y_REPOR'L
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260C < 1.00
SW8260C 46.1 50.00
SW8260C 54.3 50.00
SW8260C 47.1 50.00
SW8260C 51.2 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MBLK
Original
Amount %REC Limits
92.2 69-132
109 85-118
94.2 80-120
102 81-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/5/2011 l256h
8/5/2011 1256h
8/5/2011 l256h
8/512011 1256h
8/5/2011 1256h
Report Date: 8112/2011 Page 14 of29
All i\nalyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and ReRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampl1ng information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use ofrhe addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company OT any
member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion aT sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
ANAlVT!CAl LABORATORIES
Client: Denison Mines
. Lab Set ID: 1108108
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
1108108-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1108108-001 AM S SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1108108-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1108108-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
, 1l08108-001AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
_2-C.SUMMAAY REPO~J'_
Contact:
Dept:
10 Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C 19.6 20.00 0 98.0 43-146
%REC SW8260C 51.4 50.00 103 77-144
%REC SW8260C 51.0 50.00 102 80-123
%REC SW8260C 50.9 50.00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.3 80-125
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
loseRocha
QAOfficer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/5/2011 1430h
8/5/2011 1430h
8/5/2011 1430h
8/5/2011 1430h
8/5/2011 1430h
Report Date: 8/12/2011 Page 15 of29
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAe protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for th~ exclusive use afthe addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
member of its staff, or reproduction of this repon in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due perfonnance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
ANALYTICAL lA90~ATORIES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1108108
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
1108108-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
l108108-001AMSD SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1108108-001AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1108108-001AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1108108-001AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC. SUMM1\RXJffiPORT_
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
flglL SW8260C 20.2 20.00 0 101 43-146
%REC SW8260C 51.1 50.00 102 77-144
%REC SW8260C 51.4 50.00 103 80-123
%REC SW8260C 50.8 50.00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.2 50.00 98.4 80-125
%RPD
3.02
RPD
Limit
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/5/2011 1449h
8/5/2011 1449h
8/5/2011 1449h
8/5/2011 1449h
8/5/2011 1449h
Report Date; 8/12/2011 Page 16 of29
An analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
member of its staff, or reproduction of tbis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or salt: of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. TIlls company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
Data E'ath
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG11-C\05AUG11A\
RS7LI081. D
5 Aug 2011 1 :14 pm
1108108-00IA
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
6 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 05 13 :32:22 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Revie wed)
Ab~Jndance
2100000
TIC: R57L 1 081.D\data.ms
2000000
1900000 f .,
1800000
1700000
1600000
I/) ~ ~ g ~ § .. .ll
1 I ~ !! 0 ~ ..;. ., ~ 0 ~ i E
a> .il
Jl Iii " '"
1500000'
1400000 I ~
0
1300000 !ii
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
Time·->
~~ ~ Il 0~~2~.0~O~2-.W~~3~.~OO~3~.5~0--4~.0~0~4-.~50~~5~.b~0~5~.~'-·6n.bno,JJ~6.-~r--7~.0~0--7'.540~8r.bro~-a.'r50-'~9~.b~o~9~.~--rl-0.-00~1-0rl.5-0-1-1T.OrOr-ll-.5~0
AFULUL36 .M Fri Aug 05 13: 32 : 37 2011 R~port Date: 8/12ntlJ3lCJEp'llgcfl17 of29
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\AUG11-C\OSAUGl1A\
R58LI082.D
5 Aug 2011 1 :33 pm
1108~08-002A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
7 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time : Aug 05 13 :48 :15 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :13 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance
2000000
TIC: R58L1082.0\dala.ms
1900000
~
1800000
1700000
1600000
! "! ~ i g ~ C> ~ .. ~ $I
1 jj
~ 0 q .is ~ .SI g ..c ~ v e 1 m ;
</)
1500000
"6 c: ~
1400000 c: j
"-
1300000 ~
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
j i 01~~~~1~~1~~~--~~~~~' J~~~~~~~ ____ ~I ~~~~~~'~~Tr---~~~~~~~--~-
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00,11.50 lime->
AFULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 05 13 :48:30 2011 Repon Date: 811 212ti'fli9€p'ogJlI 8 of29
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUGIl-C\05AUGlIA\
R59LI083 .D
5 Aug 201 1 1 :52 pm
1108108-003A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
B Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time : Aug 05 14 :39 :53 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Titl e VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Revi ewed)
Abundance TIC: R5.9L1083.0\data.ms
2100000
2000000 ;jj -.;> .. "' ~
1900000 .§
1800000
1700000
1600000
g ...
0 1 ~ ~ c; ~ S c ,g
~ ~ 0 ~ -t
~ ~ e !{l '" 1500000 !5 (/)
g
1400000 ! B
1300000 Ii:
0 ~
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600MO
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000l
0~~~~~~~~~~~11--~~--~~h-~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~-rr
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 71 0 8.00 8.50 910 9.50 10.00 10~50 1 1 ~00 11.50 Tlme->
AE'ULLW_36.M Fri Aug 05 14:41 :23 2011 Report Date: 8/1212ti'f319 Ej"6gtl19 of29
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitati on Report
C;\msdchem\1\DATA\AUGI1-C\05AUGIIA\
R60L1084 .D
5 Aug 2011 2;11 pm
1l08108-004A
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
9 Sample Multiplier ; 1
Quant Time ; Aug 05 14 :40 :27 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\l \METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :13 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Revie~led)
Abundance
1.4e+07J
TIC: R60L 1 084.D\data.ms
1.35e+07
1.3e+07
1.258+07
1.2e+07
1.1 5e+07
1.1e+07
1.05e+07
9500000
9000000j 8500000
8000000
7500000
7000000
6500000
6000000
5500000
5000000
4500000
4000000
3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
1500000,
1000000'
]
;; E e
~
, g
'15 E 0 ~ :E u ~ 0
5 w
~
:6 til ~ ~ ~ '" "I ~ !8 ~ 2
~I ~ .8 ! R ., j ~ .2 ~ c '" ...
~ u c ~ E ~ .g g e
~u: '" ~I'! 5
:li!!Z til
C <'l
~ t: ~ f 50000:1~~ __ ~ITI~~"I~'~'~O!~'-~~-T~~~~r-~~~'-~n4~rM~_.,.tAJ'~O-TOrljnj~I~O~'~O1~'~ITj'l~on'-TI~jrl~' ~t~O~'~'I~"
lime-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9,00 9.50 10,00 10,50 11.00 11 .50
AFULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 05 14 ;41 ;56 2011
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Repo rt
C:\msdchem\1\OATA\AUGll-C\05AUGlIA\
R63LI085 .D
5 Aug 2011 3:08 pm
1108108-005A
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
12 Sample Mult iplier : 1
Quant Time : Aug 05 16 :30:55 2011
Quant Method C :\MSOCHEM\l\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: RG3L lC85.D'daIarr.s
1800000
1700000
~
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
• j 1 ; j I I 1
i! , ,
• ~ I • 0
1200000 •
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
aooooo
500000
400000
200000
100000
TIme->
O'~~~~~~~-.~~~~~~~~~~~~~-r--~~~r-~~r-~
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 05 16 :32 :37 2011
Data Pa'th
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
AL S Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Meth0d
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Abundance
1800000
1700000
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
aooooo
700000
600000
500000
4000J
300000
200000
100000
Quantitation Repor
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\AUG11-C\OSAUG11A\
R64LI086 .D
5 Aug 2011 3 :27 pm
1108108-006A
SAMP 5 .0ML lOF3
13 Sample Multiplier : 1
Aug 05 16 :31 :16 2011
C:\MSDCREM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
VOA Calibration
Wed Ju1 27 12 :13 :03 2011
Initial CaLibrati0n
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: R64L rOa6.D\data.ms
~ ~ j ~ /j
i ~ I '" ~ <:>
~ "-~ :l! "0 ~ i E e t: .., Jl 1;
'"
~ ~ ~ ~ u-§
UJ ~ I ~
a i E e , e .I! g li' "" ~ Q
0 '" .Q ~ <:>
l
0-'=''''--·'' 'i i ' , " " , "., . j ., • I IA ) ,I • t , I ' , j , " j f I I I j " 'j I 'j ii' j"
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.0.0 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50 Tlme->
Af'ULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 05 16 : 33 : 10 2011
Data Path
Data File
.Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG11-C\05AOGl1A\
R65L1087 .D
5 Aug 2011 3 :46 pm
l108l08-007A
SAMP 5 .OML lOF3
14 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time : Aug 05 16 :31 :35 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AfULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Ju1 27 12 :13 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviel-led)
Abundance TIC: R65L1087.D\data.ms
180.0000
1700.000
160.0.0.0.0.
1500000
-e 140.0.0.0.0
III e " '" I
J 130.000.0
e ~ 1200000
~
1100.000.
10.0.0.0.0.0.
9000.00.
80.0.0.0.0.
t '4 ~ 2: J!I a j I E e g
i3 ~I ~ ,g 0
"
70.000.0.
60.0.000
50.0.0.0.0.
" '"
40.0.00.0
I
30.0.0.0.0.
200.0.00.
10.0.0.0.0.
A \A A I . I I I I I I ' I I 0. I Time-> 2.0.0. 2.50. 3.0.0 3.50 4.0.0. 4.50. 5.0.0. 5.50 6.0.0. 6.50. 7.0.0 7.50 8.0.0 8.50. 9.0.0 9.50 10.,0.0. 10..50 11.00 11.50.
AFULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 05 16 :33 :43 2011
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitati on Report
C :\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG1l-C\05AOGllA\
R66L1088 .D
5 Aug 2011 4 :05 pm
1108108-008A
SAMP 5 .0ML 10P3
15 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time : Aug 05 16 :32 :05 2011
Quant Method C :\MSDCAEM\1\METHODS\APULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Cali.bration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :13 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(Qr Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: R66l1 088.D\data.ms
1.35e+07
1.3e+07
1.25e+07
1.2e+07
1.15e+07
1.05e+07
1e+07
9500000
9000000
8500000
8000000
7500000
7000000
6500000
6000000
5500000
5000000
4500000
4000000
is UJ f 8 g '" "l " J ~ ~ ~
"l i g ~ ~
~ !!: ~ .§ "let ~ .W
<.I ~ o·
E !~ ~ ~ ~ .I.
E 11 ~~ UJ ~ ~ 5 j~ U)
0 E
3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
1500000 E 0 -.g ~ 0
~ ~ " fJ) UJ I 1000000
500000
O!"--'-T"T"'~"--T"T"!"TT"'-"::\-""""T"T..,.,..,..........,....,..,J..,\'\l-r,-r4...-4-r-r--o--r~,.J,L,-.-~..,.4 ........ ....,...fL-,---r~'-'" -., , • I' I' I I " I ' , , , I " 'I '
5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11 .00 11.50 llme-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
AFULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 05 16 :34 :17 2011 Report Date: 8112I2tjJ3l9 ~gctl24 of29
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS vial
Quant itation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUGlI-C\05AUG11A\
R67L1089 .D
5 Aug 2011 4 :24 pm
1l0S10S-009A
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
16 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time : Aug 05 16 :39 :23 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :~3 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Revie\~ed)
Abundance TIC: R67L 1 089.D\data.ms
1600000
1500000
1400000
't g ij 5 0 ~ f m
1.300000
5 ~ $ IIJ !!l .. 1200000 E! .,
~ ~.
u.
~ 1100000
1000000 I
900000
800000
700000
(J) (J) g g .l! f 9 E e .0 g &.
'6 ...,
I 0
I ~ "t
'" r ~ i5 ~ e :> '"
I I I
600000
500.000
400000
300000
I
200000
100000
, I o I I I I' I J I I I , i Ii Ii
Time-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4_00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 05 16 :39:36 2011 Report Dale; 8/1 2I2IJI3I9Ep'ugc.42s of29
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUGll-C\05AUG11A\
R54LCS20.D
5 Aug 2011 12:18 pm
LCS VOC 080511A
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR 10 AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 05 12:35:09 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: R54LCS20.D\data.ms
4200000
4000000
3800000
3600000
3400000
3200000
3000000 ::;;;
2800000l
2600000
2400000
'l. I t. ¥l
ci> c ~ 0 ~ f-f-11 t: ::> 51.! ~ en
" .0 e
2200000
20000001
g i" 15 '.!O E
g I~ e
Co m
OJ I"" ::> t! " E (f)
.c e
1800000
1600000
g 0 u: c:
~ 1 g £'j
1400000 II!
1200000
1000000
800000 ! '" ill '" ~a: Jl! Q; 600000 2 -E ~~ e OJ 0 ]-E'E ~~~
400000 j ! ~~ o~ ~e -g
allf-=: lID
I " 1 • • I ' Time--> 2.00 2..50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11 .50
AFULLW_36.M Fri Aug 05 13:34:10 2011 Report Date: 8/12/2ijfljgEp'e.gil26of29
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantit ation Report
C :\msdchem\~\DATA\AUG11-C\05AUG1lA\
R56LMBLK .D
5 Aug 2011 12 :56 pm
ME VOC 08051lA
MELK 5 .0ML
5 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time: Aug 05 13 :31 :58 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\l\METHODS\AFULLW_36.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Revi ewed)
Abundance
2400000
TIC: R56LMBLK.D\data.ms
2300000
2200000
2100000
2000000
1900000
1800000
1700000
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000'
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
o
1ime->
l/\ i , I i I • l
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50
AFULUC36. M Fri Aug 05 13 : 34 : 43 2011
II.! i ~ ..: a ~ E e .2 ~ ~ 0 E ~ ~ ~ ;,
<h
I
\ I
5.00
'$ ~ ~ ~ I!!
.2 ~ .<: ~ 0 ~ R :ti c ".
~ ~ c ~ j
<i ~
~ ell
i j
If
~
~
I I T -, I I I 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 I ,
8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
Report Date: 8/12/2iYf:'!I9'''P'ogel27 of29
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUGI1-C\05AUG11A\
R61S1081.D
5 Aug 2011 2:30 pm
1l08108-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
10 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 05 14:42:29 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
Abundance TIC : R61 S1 081.D\data.ms
2600000
2500000
2400000
2300000
2200000
2100000·
2000000
1900000
1800000
1700000
1600000
1500000
g
'" -g
E o E ~ '"
Time--> 2.00
AFULLW_36.M Fri Aug 05 14:43:22 2011
'" ~ " c: <ll .2 0 f-
" en
g
~ Q) D ~ g rr:
CJ ~
1 i ~
i!l OJ
co i:!
1l OJ .<J
~ ~
0 0 :c ~ (J is 0 .... f-
0 ~
en_
~ ~ .<J ~ g
'5 E ~ '" '5 " en ~ ~ 0
t~ 1)
It' ~ " f a.
I~
Report Date: 8112/2ijJljgEp'tlg#28 of29
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Oper,ator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quan titat'0n Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUGll-C\OSAOGllA\
R62Dl081 .D
5 Aug 2011 2 :49 pm
nOBl08-001AMSD
MSD 5 .0ML 30E3
11 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Iime : Aug 05 15 :01 :22 2011
Quant Method C :\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Tit le VOA Calihrati on
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :l3 :03 2011
Response via Ini tial Calibration
(No t Revi ewed)
Abundance TIC: R62D1081.D\datams
2500000
2400000
2300000 ti ~
2200000 ~ !:!
:;l j
2100000 ~ 0 ~
0 2000000 Iii
" 1900000
1800000
~ "1 ~ g ~ ~ (!. ~ " UI ~
1700000 g
2 m
1600000 ~
1500000 lti
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
I I ~ g
~ """ ~ .s j ~ ~ ~ u.. .~ a ~ ~
II i ~ ..
900000
800000 8' ,'" 1
700000 ~ ... 0
600000
500000
400000
'l!! ~ '5
11 UI
0 ., il8 ~ ~ -, ou~
300000 !! IT ...
200000
~ tl c; E" ~ c E e m 100000
Time-->
r ) 6.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50
AFUL LIC36 .M Fri Aug 05 16 :25 :49 2011
I i ~ 12 2!~ !.I ..... ... ~M %'j " • -~ z
I Ii
II i III I j i \ I J i' '. i 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client:
Client 10:
Project:
Comments:
Sample ID
1108108-001A
J 108 J 08-002A
110810S-003A
1108108-D04A
110S108-DOSA
11 081 08-006A
1l0810S-007A
II0810S-00SA
110SlOS-009A
Denison Mines
DENIOO Contact:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011 QC Level:
No Hard Copies (UL). QC 3 & SUlTunary. EDD-CSV. Report THF to 1 )lg/L.;
Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date
MW-ll 8/3120 II 1025h S/5/20 II 0945h
MW-14 S/3/201 J 1335h
MW-25 8/3120 II 1045h
MW-26 S/3/2011 0835h -. MW-30 S/3/2011 1445h
MW-31 8/2/2011 1400h
MW-35 8/2/2011 1430h
MW-65 8/3/2011 083511
Trip Blank SI2I2011
Work Order: 1108108
Page 1 of 1 8/5/20 II
Jo Ann Tischler
LEVEL 1II WO Type: Project
D6
Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
8/19/2011 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
8260-W ~ VOCFridge --'-' 8260-W ~ VOCFridge -S260-W ~ VOCFridge
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
\ \o1)\oi
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
P . t rOJee S amplers N ame S amplers S· Ignature
3rd Quarter Ground ~oM«-))~ Water 2011 Tanner Holliday
~~
Date Time
Sample 10 Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW-11 8/3/2011 1025 THF
MW-14 8/3/2011 1335 THF
MW-25 8/3/2011 1045 THF
MW-26 8/3/2011 835 THF
MW-30 8/3/2011 1445 THF
MW-31 8/2/2011 1400 THF
MW-35 8/2/2011 1430 THF
MW-65 8/3/2011 835 THF
Trip Blank 8/2/2011
•
Please notify Ryan Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately! Thank
you.
Relinquished By:(Signature)
~~/:I~~
Relinquished By:(Signature)
DatelTime Receive By:(Signature)
8/4/2011
1130
DatelTime
:ab~rcCT'K~~'f>!L.-__ _
Samples Were: CDC Tape Was: Container Type:
~hippedBy: LA~.)S Present on Outer Package o A W AL Supplied Plastic
o Hand Delivered ~~s DNa DN/A o A WAL Supplied Clear Glass
D Ambient Unbroken on Outer package o A WAL Supplied Amber Glass ....-/ ~hilled IJ]~ ONo DN/A o A WAL Supplied VOA/TOC/~
~eralure -z.."!J °C Present on Sample D Amber 0 Clear 0 Readspace 1 0 Headspace
Rec. Broken/Leaking DYes ~o ON/A DYes ~ DN/A o Non A WAL Supplied coo('ainer
Notes: Unbroken on sa~ 7 DYes ONo 7A
Properly Preserved M'Yes ONo ON/A Notes:
Notes:
./
Rec. Within Hold 'ff"Yes DNa Discrepancies Between Labels and COC
Notes: Notes:
~
,,/
Bottle Type Preservative All pHs OK ../
Ammonia pH <2 H2SO4 V
COD pH <2 H2S04 7
Cyanide PH >12 NaOH V
Metals pH <2 HN03 ../
N02 & N03 pH <2 H2SO4 V
Nutrients pH <2 H2SO4 ../
O&G pH <2 HCL /v
Phenols pH <2 H2SO4 /'
Sulfide pH> 9NaOH, ZnAC /'
TKN pH <2 H2SO4 /"
TOC pH <2 H3P04 /"
TP04 pH <2 H2SO4 /
TPH pH <2 HCL /"
V
/
/'
/
Procedure: Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag CDC and notify client for further instructions
Place client conversation on CDC
Samples may be adjusted at client request
.1 \ 1
No. Rec./'
/'"
....... V
DYes s-No
UPS Internet Shipping: Shipment Label
UPS Internet Shipping: View/Print Label
1. Print the label(s): Select the Print button on the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your browser
does not support this function select Print from the File menu to print the label.
2. Fold the printed label at the solid line below. Place the label in a UPS Shipping Pouch. If you do
not have a pouch, affix the folded label using clear plastic shipping tape over the entire label.
3. GETTING YOUR SHIPMENT TO UPS
Customers without a Daily Pickup
Schedule a same day or future day Pickup to have a UPS driver pickup all of your Internet Shipping
packages.
Hand the package to any UPS driver in your area.
Take your package to any location of The UPS Store®, UPS Drop Box, UPS Customer Center, UPS
Alliances (Office Depot® or Staples®) or Authorized Shipping Outlet near you. Items sent via UPS
Return Services(SM) (including via Ground) are also accepted at Drop Boxes. To find the location
nearest you, please visit the 'Find Locations' Quick link at ups.com.
Customers with a Daily Pickup
Your driver will pickup your shipment(s) as usual.
FOLD HERE
Page 1 of 1
llttps:1 Iwww.ups.com/uis/ create? ActionOriginPair=defauIt_PrintWindowPage&key= label... 8/4/2011
JoAnn Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
Anh: I iC;:;1l W(~st Denver, CO 80265
An',I'IT1CAI I /lDORATORlr So
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: (801 ) 263-8687
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
TEL: [phone]
RE: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Dear JoAnn Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1108246
American West Analytical Laboratories received 3 sample(s) on 8/12/2011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado, Idaho, and Missouri.
Certification document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns
regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
QA Officer Thank You, Ky I e F. Digitally signed by Kyte F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyte F. Gross. o=AWAL.
ou=AWAL, email=kyle@awal-
G labs.com, c=US ross 001.:2011.08.1813:11:54-06'00'
Approved by:
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 8/1 5/2011 Page 1 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive usc oflhe addrc.!isee. Privileges of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction-oflhis· report in connection with th\! advertisement, prgmolion or sale of any product or process, or ill connection with the. re-publicalion of this report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This contpany accepts no responsibility except for the duc perfomlance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according fa the rules oflhe trade and of science
American West
A f~ A J V TIC A L I A. (3 ('I ~ A TOR I I S
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Denison Mines
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108246
Date Received: 8/12/2011 0935h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
1108246-001A MW-36 8/912011 1150h
1108246-002A MW-37 8/1112011 0815h
1108246-004A Trip Blank 8/912011
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 2 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and ReRA arc performed in accordance 10 NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonllalion is localed on the attached COCo lllis report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of
subsequent u'se oflhe name oflhi5 company or any member ufits staff, or reproductiOll of this report in connection with th~ advertisement, promotion or sole afaRY produ~t or process. or in connection with the Te-publication of.this repan [oTany
purpose other than for the addresscc will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfomlance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of Ihc trade and of science.
II t~ " , '( T' C A' ,1\ ,1 !) ~ A Ton I S
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (801 ) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
Project:
Lab SetID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
1108246
8112/2011
8/9 & 8/1112011
Intact
None
SW-8468260C/S030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 3 of I 7
All analyses applicable 10 the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perrormed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling inronnalion is located on the attached COc. 111is report is provided for the exclusive use oflhc addressee. Privilegos of
sub:;;equen( use oflhe name of this.company or. any member of its slaff, or reproduction of-this report in connection with the advcrtiscment, promC'ltion or sale of any product or process, or in connection·with thc re~publjcalion of Ihis report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be. granted only un contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of lhe tmde and of science
American West
,/ .. NALY'TICAL LAI::lORATORIE.S
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1108246
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
SampleID Analyte
LCS VOC 081211A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 081211A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
, LCS VOC 081211A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 081211A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 081211A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labS.com
Units
IlgIL
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
C SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260C 12.6 20.00
SW8260C 49.2 50.00
SW8260C 51.3 50.00
SW8260C 50.9 50.00
SW8260C 49.7 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
LCS
Amount %REC Limits
0 62.8 43-146
98.4 69-132
103 85-118
102 80-120
99.4 81-120
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8/12/2011 1210h
8/12/2011 1210h
8/12/2011 1210h
8/12/2011 1210h
8/12/2011 1210h
Report Date: &/1512011 Page 7 of17
All analyses applicable to tbe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the narne of this company or any
member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the ru1es of the trade and of science.
American West
ANAl'!'T CAL LA80R/l.TOA ~s
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1108246
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
SampleID Analyte
MB VOC 081211A Tetrabydrofuran
MB VOC 081211A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 081211A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 08121 IA Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 081211A Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, DT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Units
~g/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Metbod Result Spiked
SW8260C < 1.00
SW8260C 51.5 50.00
SW8260C 54.7 50.00
SW8260C 50.9 50.00
SW8260C 50.3 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MBLK
Amount %REC Limits
103 69-132
109 85-118
102 80-120
101 81-120
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8112/2011 1248b
8/12/2011 1248h
8112/2011 1248h
8/12/2011 1248h
8/12/2011 1248h
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 8 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oflhe name ofthis company or any
member of jts staff, or reproduction ofrhis repon in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication or this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on conract. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due perfonnance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith and according [0 the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
Al\f,lYT CAL LABORATOR lS
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1108246
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
I 108246-00 I AMS Tetrahydrofuran
I I 08246-00 I AMS Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1108246-001AMS Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
l108246-001AMS Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
I I 08246-00 lAMS Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, ur 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-lahs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
flg/L SW8260C 13.4 20.00 0 67.0 43-146
%REC SW8260C 57.6 50.00 115 77-144
%REC SW8260C 51.6 50.00 103 80-123
%REC SW8260C 54.5 50.00 109 80-124
%REC SW8260C 48.5 50.00 97.0 80-125
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Qual Date Analyzed
8112/2011 144lh
8/12/2011 1441h
8/12/2011 1441 h
8/12/2011 144lh
8112/2011 1441h
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 9 of 17
All analyses applicable to th. CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are petformed in accordance to NELAC proracols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for rhe exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges ofsubs<quent use ofthc name of this company or any
member afits staft: or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted Daly on contact. This company 3i:ccpts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
Af'oiAL'I'TiCAL lAHO~ATOR lS
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set In: 1108246
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011
, SampleID Analyte
1108246-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
II08246-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
I 108246-00 I AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1108246-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
II 08246-00J AMSD Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
OC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlgIL SW8260C 14.6 20.00 0 73.2 43-146
%REC SW8260C 57.8 50.00 116 77-144
%REC SW8260C 52.0 50.00 104 80-123
%REC SW8260C 55.0 50.00 110 80-124
%REC SW8260C 48.0 50.00 95.9 80-125
RPD
%RPD Limit
8.92 25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
8112/2011 1500h
8/12/2011 1500h
8/12/2011 1500h
8/12/2011 1500h
8/12/2011 1500h
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 10 of 17
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on tlte attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofsciencc:.
Quantitation Report
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\AUG11-C\l2AUG11A\
S99L2461.0
12 Aug 2011 1:26 pm
1108246-001A
SAMP 5.OML 10F3
ALS Vial 7 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 12 13:38:45 2011
Quant Method C:\MSOCHEM\1\MSTHOOS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
Abundance
1800000
17000001
'600000
'500000
'000000
800000
700000
600000
'00000
300000
200000 ,I
(OT Reviewed)
I ;
o ---"--------------'-----r---__ _
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 6.00 6.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_36.M Fri Aug 12 13:38:59 2011 Page: 4
Rcpon Date: 811 SnOll Page II of 17
Data Path
Data rile
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG1l-C\12AUG11A\
TOOL2462 .D
12 Aug 2011 1 :45 pm
1l08246-002A
SAM? 5.0ML 10r3
B Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time: Aug 12 14:09 :45 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :13 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: TOOL2462.D\data.ms
1700000 I
1600000
1500000
1400000!
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000·
800000·
700000
600000
500000'
400000
3000001
I
I
200000
100000
I II:
~
'" ~ ~ ~
-5 .!l! ~ ~ 0 ~ 0
i ~
~ "r.
c ~ ~
I r
.,;
1 ~ !
6 ::: c e '" .§
j !II ~ .2 I ~ ":.
0
L ~ ; .& Jl I: " '"
.0" -----Time--> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11 .50
AFULLW_36.M Fri Aug 12 14 :10:03 2011 Page: 4
Report Dale: 8fl5/20 II Page 12 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG11-C\l2AUGllA\
T01L2464.D
12 Aug 2011 2:04 pm
1108246-0041'.
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
9 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time : Aug 12 15:22:43 2011
Quant Method C:\MSOCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36 .M
Quant Title VOl'. Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 21 12 :13 :03 2011
Response via I nitial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: TOI L2464.O\dala.ms
1<00000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000 I
900000
800000
700000
800000
500000
'00000
I I B -
.i .i
300000
200000
100000
o -------------. -
Time··> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5:50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 6.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11 .50
AFULLW_36.M Fri Aug 12 15:30 :49 2011 Page: .,
Report Dale: 8/15120 II Page 13 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUG11-C\12AUG11A\
S95LCS20.D
12 Aug 2011 12:10 pm
LCS VOC 081211A
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR 10 AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 12 12:23:24 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: S95LCS20.Dldata.ms
3200000
3000000·
28000001
2600000
2400000
2200000
2000000
1800000
1600000
1400000
I
1200000
1000000
800000
600000 ~ ~ §a::; g~
400000! I b.
;5~ ~
200000 ClIO
I
0
Time .. > 2.00
AFULLW_ 36.M Fri
"
,
i,
2.50 3.00
Aug 12
~ Ie .8 e 0 if
0 f0-!!l
a: ~ t: " ..c M' ! ~ .. ~~ II to) ~ • ~~ ,I
:2 ~ ~I '''-= Ii g '" ";R,z; I .• ,' ~.g ~ .~u ,.:' ,fs.f> .'" "I
i: R ~. I I ci::' ".1 ,s< , I , III 1 Ii' " . , , :",1 -'------3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
13:37:25 2011
i ~ ~ t: " en
6.00
:=; a:
1 ?< c. ...
E
"l. .. c: .. N c: .. so e g
'll E e m
~ en
1
I
~ I :Ii 0 ..a..
---,. ---
6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
Page: 4
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 14 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
0pera·tor
Sample
Mise
A.LS Vial
Quantitation Report
C : \msdehem\l\DATA \AUGll-C\12AUG11A \
S97LMBLK.D
12 Aug 2011 12 :48 pm
MB VOC 08121111.
MBLK 5 .0ML
5 Sample Mul tiplier: 1-
Quant Time : Aug 12 ~3 : 34 : 56 2011
Quant Method C: \MSDCHEM\1 \METHODS\AFULLW_36 . M
Quant Title VOA Calibra'tion
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12 :13 :03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abf!llib1llft1 TIC: S97LMBLK.D\d;rta.ms
I
1700000 1 <: ..
1600000
1500000
1400000
13000001
tit I l l!I B oS!
I z:; 0 I ! .. g ",' c i ~ Iii
I:: ~-'" rn ".
m t " r
1200000[
1100000
1000000'
900000-
800000i
I
700000 i j
600000 '" g I! oS! i :l}
'" ,S ~
500000j c ~ " 0
400000
300000·
200000
100000
o
Time·> 2.00 2 .. 50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11 .50
AFULLW_36 .M Fri Aug 12 13:37 :58 2011 Page : 4
Report Dote: 811 5120 II Page 15 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\AUG11-C\12AUG11A\
T03S2461.D
12 Aug 2011 2:41 pm
1l08246-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
11 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 12 15:23:51 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: T03S2461.D\data.ms
2600000'
2500000.
2400000' I
I 2300000
1
22000001
21000001
I
2000000
1900000
1800000
17000001
1600000'
1500000
1400000i
I
13000001
12000001
1100000!
I
1000000:
I 900000
800000
7000001
6000001
500000ii
400000~ ~ a:.
300000i i :~ ~ .-.s,
200000,'" ~
100000' I
" o I
" v
ot5 I ~ CD N c: ~ i E
I m
"!. .,
j (j) c: ~ ,;;
~ ~ ~ .§ (/J g
'" ~ !! '"
--.--~~-~'----,----. -r ----. ~.
Time-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_36.M Fri Aug 12 15:28:50 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 16 of 17
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\AUGII-C\12AUG11A\
T04D2461.D
12 Aug 2011 3:00 pm
1l08246-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3
12 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Aug 12 15:24:12 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_36.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Jul 27 12:13:03 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: T04D2461.D\data.ms
2700000
2600000
2500000
2400000
2300000
2200000, I
2100000
20000001
1 I 1900000i
1800000,
I
1700000i
1600000:
15000001
1
1400000
1300000
1
1200000
1100000!
1000000:
900000
800000-
700000
600000
500000~ = 'CD 400000~ a;, ~~ 300000~ I j~ ~ ~ ~
2000001 i I
I
100000
1
,1, :
ot .
"!. ~ '" CD ~ l-~ 0 '"
, I
-1._.·------,......
~ Iii I ~ 0
~
I '" I
.,;
Iii t! II e I :;; ox:
I ~ til
CD " ~ a. ..
E
1
II I " I I --.;. __ ._1
I
I •
I 1.:_-+-____ _
Tlme--> 2,00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_36.M Fri Aug 12 15:29:23 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 8/15/2011 Page 17 of 17
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1108246
Client: Denison Mines Page 1 of 1 8/12/2011
ClientlD: DEN 100 Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Project: 3rd Quarter Ground Water 2011 QC Level: LEVEL III WOType: Project
Comments: QC 3 & Summary. EDD-CSV. Report THF to 1 !lg/L.;
SampleID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1l0S246-001A MW-36 8/912011 llSOh S112/2011 093Sh 8/2612011 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
IIOS246-002A MW-37 S/ll/20ll 0815h 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
1108246-003A MW-70 8/10120111420h 0
1108246-004A Trip Blank 8/9/20]] 8126/2011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 2
.. EN I SO J) ~ ~ ~I Shee~t 1 of---'-------J1
MINES
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project Samplers Name Samplers Signature
3rd Quarter Ground :J~~ Water 2011 Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Sample 10 Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW-36 8/9/2011 1150 THF
MW-37 8/11/2011 815 THF
'V-u U/ 'V/LV I<fLV 'Nv.1 vf"C, THF "J/e. i-(..'-" 1-r ~~ '",/
Trip Blank 8/912011 -rH-F " ..
Please notify Ryan Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately!
Thank you.
Relinquished By:(Signature)
::)~~/"-_'-
DatelTime Receiv. a By:(Signature)
8/11/2011
1130
/
DatelTime
UPS Internet Shipping: Shipment Label
UPS Internet Shipping: View/Print Label
1. Print the label(s): Select the Print button on the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your browser
does not support this function select Print from the File menu to print the label.
2. Fold the printed label at the solid line below. Place the label in a UPS Shipping Pouch. If you do
not have a pouch, affix the folded label using clear plastic shipping tape over the entire label.
3. GETIING YOUR SHIPMENT TO UPS
Customers without a Daily Pickup
Schedule a same day or future day Pickup to have a UPS driver pickup all of your Internet Shipping
packages.
Hand the package to any UPS driver in your area.
Take your package to any location of The UPS Store®, UPS Drop Box, UPS Customer Center, UPS
Alliances (Office Depot® or Staples®) or Authorized Shipping Outlet near you. Items sent via UPS
Return Services(SM) (including via Ground) are also accepted at Drop Boxes. To find the location
nearest you, please visit the 'Find Locations' Quick link at ups.com.
Customers with a Daily Pickup
Your driver will pickup your shipment(s) as usual.
FOLD HERE
co ..,f .....
..,f .....
https:llwww..ups.com/uis/create?ActionOriginPair=default __ P~tWindowPage&key=lab,,:
Page 1 of 1
8/11/2011
EI\ERGY
,., , 1"1 I IJj --.
October 07, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11090045
Halena, MT 811-472-0711 • Billings, MT 801-735-4489 . Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 18B-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-172-12%5 • CoIalle Station, 1X 881-610-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
Quote 10: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 7 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 9/1/2011 for analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11090045-001 MW-14 08/30/11 13:30 09/01/11
C 11090045-002 MW-32 08/30/11 13:05 09/01/11
C11090045-003 MW-65 08/30/11 11 : 10 09/01/11
C 11 090045-004 MW-25 08/30/11 10:4509/01/11
C11090045-005 MW-35 08/30/11 14:35 09/01111
C11090045-006 MW-26 08/30/11 11:10 09/01/11
C 11090045-007 Temp Blank 08/30/11 0:00 09/01111
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Metals by ICP/lCPMS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Metals by ICP/lCPMS, Dissolved
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Same As Above
Same As Above
Same As Above
Same As Above
Temperature
The analyses presented in this report were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper,
WY 82601, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory
Analytical Report, the QAlQC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
o¥~£) Wd~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011.10.07 10:25:52 -06:00
Page 1 of 20
www.energylab.com
AIIIIytIaI ~ S/Ia 1m
Halena, MT 177-472-0711 • Billings, MT IGD-735-4419 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&-686-7175 • Ra Id City, SD 888-812-1225 . Colle e Stalion 1X 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp Revised Date: 10/07/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011 Report Date: 10/04/11
Sample Delivery Group: Cl1090045 CASE NARRATIVE
REVISED/SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT
The attached analytical report has been revised from a previously submitted report due to the request by Kathy Weinel on
October 6, 2011 for the addition of cations on samples -001 through -006. The data presented here is from that additional
analysis.
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIUSOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysiS.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 20
EN:RGY
1\ •• ' _ I .. I ~ 1-.11 • I
www.energylab.com
AMlyflalbuII-. .. 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090045
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A4500-NH3 G Batch: R150159
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank Run: TECHNICON_11 0902B 09/02/11 12:19
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N ND mg/L 0.050
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample Run: TECHNICON_11 0902B 09/02/11 12:21
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.95 mg/L 0.050 98 90 110
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: TECHNICON_11 0902B 09/02/11 12:23
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.94 mg/L 0.050 99 80 120
Sample 10: C11081125-001DMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 0902B 09/02/11 12:45
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 7.06 mg/L 0.050 101 80 120
Sample 10: C11081125-0010MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_110902B 09/02/11 12:47
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 7.09 mg/L 0.050 103 80 120 0.4 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 10 of 20
EI\ERGY
.\ ·1 •• \1"1., '..,)
www.energylab.com
~~"'11U
Helena, MT 177-472-0711 • Billings, NT 801-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatte, WY IBB-BBB-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • Coliege Station, TX 888-&80-2218
oAtoe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: MB-110914A 5 Method Blank
Calcium ND mg/L
Iron ND mg/L
Magnesium ND mg/L
Potassium ND mg/L
Sodium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-110914A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Calcium 49.2 mg/L
Iron 0.988 mg/L
Magnesium 48.9 mg/L
Potassium 43.3 mg/L
Sodium 47.1 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090045-005BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike
Calcium 618 mg/L
Iron 2.18 mg/L
Magnesium 251 mg/L
Potassium 102 mg/L
Sodium 497 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090045-005BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Calcium 610 mg/L
Iron 2.18 mg/L
Magnesium 250 mg/L
Potassium 103 mg/L
Sodium 495 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: Cll090045
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: R150610
Run: ICP2-C_ll0914A 09/14/11 13:04
0.50
0.030
0.50
0.50
0.50
Run : ICP2-C_ll0914A 09/14/11 13:08
0.50 99 85 115
0.030 99 85 115
0.50 98 85 115
0.50 87 85 115
0.50 94 85 115
Run : ICP2-C_ll0914A 09/14/11 15:21
1.0 70 130 A
0.030 97 70 130
1.0 94 70 130
1.0 88 70 130
1.0 70 130 A
Run : ICP2-C_ll0914A 09/14/11 15:25
1.0 70 130 1.3 20 A
0.030 97 70 130 0.2 20
1.0 94 70 130 0.2 20
1.0 89 70 130 1.0 20
1.0 70 130 0.4 20 A
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 11 of 20
E"fRGY
/\ ,( I' ~. I {~'. " ._
www.energylab.com
~~SS-'IIU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT aol·735-4419 • Casper, WY 881·235-0515
Gillatts, WV IIB·616·7175 • Rapid City, SD 118-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 188·&80-2218
OA/oe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090045
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte
Method: E200.B
Sample 10: LRB
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Count Result
16 Method Blank
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: LFB
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
16 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: C11090045·002BMS4
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
0.0512 mg/L
0.0518 mg/L
0.0501 mg/L
0.0508 mg/L
0.0520 mg/L
0.0503 mg/L
0.0500 mg/L
0.00515 mg/L
0.0521 mg/L
0.0520 mg/L
0.0204 mg/L
0.0493 mg/L
0.0517 mg/L
0.0511 mg/L
0.0493 mg/L
0.0540 mg/L
16 Sample Matrix Spike
0.0507 mg/L
0.0434 mg/L
0.0487 mg/L
0.0871 mg/L
0.0529 mg/L
0.0519 mg/L
4.92 mg/L
0.00473 mg/L
0.0619 mg/L
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.0050
0.00050
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.00050
0.010
0.0050
0.010
0.00050
0.10
0.00030
0.010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
101
104
100
102
104
101
100
103
104
103
102
99
103
102
99
108
99
85
92
94
93
104
95
103
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll0902A
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll 0902A
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C 110902A -
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Batch: R150176
09/02/11 15:08
09/02/11 15:11
09/02/11 15:57
A
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 12 of 20
EN:RGY
,-, .' I ~ • , I ( ~ I J!' •
www.energylab.com
~~"'15Z
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 801-735-44" • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 188-888-7115 . Rapid City, SD 818-&72-1225 • Collage Station, TX 188-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/07/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: C11090045-002BMS4 16 Sample Matrix Spike
Selenium 0.0477 mg/L
Silver 0.0148 mg/L
Thallium 0.0526 mg/L
Tin 0.0477 mg/L
Uranium 0.0575 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0476 mg/L
Zinc 0.106 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090045-002BMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
R -RPO exceeds advisory limit.
0.0510 mg/L
0.0435 mg/L
0.0492 mg/L
0.0881 mg/L
0.0534 mg/L
0.0524 mg/L
5.06 mg/L
0.00482 mg/L
0.0627 mg/L
0.0478 mg/L
0.0114 mg/L
0.0524 mg/L
0.0488 mg/L
0.0577 mg/L
0.0477 mg/L
0.108 mg/L
Report Date: 10/04/11
Work Order: Cll090045
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Batch: R150176
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll 0902A 09/02/11 15:57
0.0010 91 70 130
0.010 74 70 130
0.0010 105 70 130
0.0010 95 70 130
0.00030 109 70 130
0.0010 94 70 130
0.010 70 70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll 0902A 09/02/11 16:00
0.0010 100 70 130 0.5 20
0.010 85 70 130 0.3 20
0.0010 93 70 130 0.9 20
0.010 96 70 130 1.1 20
0.010 94 70 130 0.9 20
0.050 104 70 130 0.9 20
0.010 70 130 2.8 20 A
0.0010 96 70 130 1.8 20
0.0010 104 70 130 1.3 20
0.0010 91 70 130 0.2 20
0.010 57 70 130 26 20 SR
0.0010 105 70 130 0.3 20
0.0010 98 70 130 2.3 20
0.00030 110 70 130 0.3 20
0.0010 94 70 130 0.1 20
0.010 73 70 130 1.7 20
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 13 of 20
EN:RGY
i\.'l 1/".1 ' 1/11'
www.energylab.com
AuIytIaI EIuIIwa SIIa 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BGI-731-44B! • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 188-&18-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/07/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB 8 Method Blank
Cadmium ND mg/L
Chromium ND mg/L
Cobalt ND mg/L
Copper ND mg/L
Manganese ND mg/L
Nickel ND mg/L
Uranium ND mg/L
Vanadium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB 8 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Cadmium 0.0464 mg/L
Chromium 0.0464 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0459 mg/L
Copper 0.0461 mg/L
Manganese 0.0452 mg/L
Nickel 0.0463 mg/L
Uranium 0.0459 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0453 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090045-003BMS4 8 Sample Matrix Spike
Cadmium 0.0400 mg/L
Chromium 0.0430 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0422 mg/L
Copper 0.0439 mg/L
Manganese 0.837 mg/L
Nickel 0.0501 mg/L
Uranium 0.0726 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0437 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090045-003BMSO 8 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Cadmium 0.0408 mg/L
Chromium 0.0422 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0423 mg/L
Copper 0.0456 mg/L
Manganese 0.838 mg/L
Nickel 0.0541 mg/L
Uranium 0.0735 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0426 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Report Date: 10/04/11
Work Order: C11090045
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R150219
Run: ICPMS2-C_l1 0906A 09/06/11 12:05
0.00050
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.00030
0.010
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll0906A 09/06/11 12:08
0.0010 93 85 115
0.0010 93 85 115
0.0010 92 85 115
0.0010 92 85 115
0.0010 90 85 115
0.0010 93 85 115
0.00030 92 85 115
0.0010 91 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_l1 0906A 09/06/11 13:31
0.010 80 70 130
0.0010 85 70 130
0.010 82 70 130
0.010 83 70 130
0.010 70 130 A
0.050 80 70 130
0.00030 98 70 130
0.0010 87 70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll 0906A 09/06/11 13:34
0.010 81 70 130 2.2 20
0.0010 84 70 130 1.7 20
0.010 82 70 130 0.2 20
0.010 86 70 130 3.9 20
0.010 70 130 0.1 20 A
0.050 88 70 130 7.6 20
0.00030 99 70 130 1.3 20
0.0010 85 70 130 2.4 20
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 14 of 20
EN:RGY
.\ ,(, ~ Ii' I ( ,I '/ .
www.energylab.com
AM/ftIuI ~ SItIu IIJ1
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT IGD·73S·4481 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillatte, WY .18·111·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-112-1225 • Collage Station, IX 888-680·2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/07/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 10/04/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011 Work Order: C11090045
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPD RPOLImit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R150298A
Sample 10: LRB 7 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0907A 09/07/1113:25
Beryllium NO mg/L 0.00050
Chromium ND mg/L 0.020
Cobalt ND mg/L 0.010
Copper ND mg/L 0.010
Manganese ND mg/L 0.010
Nickel ND mg/L 0.020
Vanadium ND mg/L 0.010
Sample 10: LFB 7 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0907A 09/07/11 13:30
Beryllium 0.0555 mg/L 0.0010 111 85 115
Chromium 0.0538 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Cobalt 0.0537 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Copper 0.0551 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Manganese 0.0518 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
Nickel 0.0548 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Vanadium 0.0536 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Sample 10: C11090068-001CMS4 7 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS4-C 110907A 09/07/11 21 :42
Beryllium 0.0460 mg/L 0.010 92 70 130
Chromium 0.0503 mg/L 0.0010 101 70 130
Cobalt 0.0476 mg/L 0.010 95 70 130
Copper 0.0495 mg/L 0.010 99 70 130
Manganese 0.0519 mg/L 0.010 98 70 130
Nickel 0.0489 mg/L 0.0010 98 70 130
Vanadium 0.0532 mg/L 0.0010 102 70 130
Sample 10: C11090068-001CMSO 7 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run : ICPMS4-C_ll0907A 09/07/11 22 :06
Beryllium 0.0491 mg/L 0.010 98 70 130 6.6 20
Chromium 0.0495 mg/L 0.0010 99 70 130 1.6 20
Cobalt 0.0499 mg/L 0.010 100 70 130 4.8 20
Copper 0.0489 mg/L 0.010 97 70 130 1.2 20
Manganese 0.0543 mg/L 0.010 102 70 130 4.4 20
Nickel 0.0481 mg/L 0.0010 96 70 130 1.5 20
Vanadium 0.0527 mg/L 0.0010 101 70 130 0.8 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 15 of 20
EN:RGY
~\ .' I'~"'" i ' ""1 •
www.energylab.com
AMI1*M~SIIa 1151
Helen., MT 177-472-D711 • Billings, MT IDI-735-4419 • Casper, WY 111-235-0515
GiIIBtto, WY 188-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 118-172-12%5 • Collage Station, TX 188-6BD-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Report Date: 10/04/11
Work Order: C 11090045
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: C11 090119-001 BMS4 3 Sample Matrix Spike
Beryllium 0.0453 mg/L
Cobalt 0.140 mg/L
Manganese 0.632 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090119-001BMSO 3 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Beryllium 0.0455 mg/L
Cobalt 0.141 mg/L
Manganese 0.633 mg/L
Sample 10: LRB 3 Method Blank
Beryllium NO mg/L
Cobalt NO mg/L
Manganese NO mg/L
Sample 10: LFB 3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Beryllium 0.0549 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0515 mg/L
Manganese 0.0502 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R150372A
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0908A 09/09/11 00:25
0.010 90 70 130
0.010 104 70 130
0.010 70 130 A
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0908A 09/09/11 00:29
0.010 91 70 130 0.4 20
0.010 106 70 130 0.4 20
0.010 70 130 0.1 20 A
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0908A 09/08/11 15: 17
0.00050
0.010
0.010
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0908A 09/08/11 15:22
0.0010 110 85 115
0.0010 103 85 115
0.0010 100 85 115
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 16 of 20
EN:RGY
, . , • /~ I ' I III .~
www.energylab.com
~~"'1I5Z
Helena, MT 171-472-0711 • Billings, MT 101·735-4489 • Casper, WY 181-235-0515
Gillatte, WY 188·6111·7175 • Rapid City, SD 118·172·1225 • College StatiDn, 1X 811·690·2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10107/11
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090045
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Method: E353.2 Batch: R150118
Sample 10: MBLK·1 Method Blank Run: TECHNICON_110901A 09/01 /11 14:34
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L 0.10
Sample 10: LCS·2 Laboratory Control Sample Run : TECHNICON_11 0901 A 09/01 /11 14:37
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.46 mg/L 0.10 98 90 110
Sample 10: LFB·3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: TECHNICON_110901A 09/01 /11 14:39
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.76 mg/L 0.10 90 90 110
Sample 10: C11090052·002EMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 0901A 09/01/11 18:47
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.98 mg/L 0.10 101 90 110
Sample 10: C11090052·002EMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_110901A 09/01 /11 18:49
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.03 mg/L 0.10 104 90 110 2.5 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 17 of 20
EN:RGY
'\ _I' I ~, , j I ~ II •
www.energylab.com
AMIftIaI ExuIIIIIIII SIIa 1152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT IGI·731-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 18B-888-7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/07/11
Report Date: 10/04/11
Work Order: C11090045
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater Resample 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: MB-GA-0475
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0475
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C11090162-0011MS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C11090162-0011MSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL • Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
0.299 pCi/L
0.268 pCilL
0.370 pCi/L
Laboratory Control Sample
20.0 pCilL
Sample Matrix Spike
52.2 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
57.4 pCilL
RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLlmit Qual
Run: BERTHOLD 770·1_110909A
Run: BERTHOLD 770·1_110909A
94 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 110909A -
97 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 110909A -109 70 130 9.5
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Batch: GA·0475
09/15/11 15:47
U
09/15/11 15:47
09/15/11 17:56
09/15/11 17:56
21.6
Page 18 of 20
EN:RGY
I,M 'I ~., I 1'1 •
www.energyiab.com
Alufl1lnl £1UIIIIa Sku 1m
Haiena, MT 177-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatts, WY BB&-B8B-7175 • Rapid City, SD B88-872-1225 • College Siallon, 1X 888-690-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I
C11090045
Login completed by: Debra Williams
Reviewed by: BL2000\cwagner
Reviewed Date: 9/6/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/boUle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes 0
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
2.3'C On Ice
Yes 0
Yes [{1
Date Received: 9/1/2011
Received by: kg
Carrier FedEx
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present [{1
No VOA vials submitted [{1
Not Applicable 0
Page 19 of 20
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record pageLOfL _'flU ,W'PJiI'i_P#IJ' PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Company Name: ~~.lj\fJ~d1J1/~< proj~ame. PWS, Permit, Etc. I Sample Origin
,,3 I1tM.lf rt. !'rRID1~ State: vt/
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes.Jil No 0
RePOrt Mall A?u0S: a ~ ~tJ q
JS~J1j,~ fAr ~LI '} I /
Conrme:(} _. Phone/Fax: /
iitfUL u/~ __ b1:r-tz.z".L
Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~A~/j/j.4_
Invoice Address: ,..---J
Sa ~
Invoife Contact & Phone:
Special Report/Formats: ~ ~&I1 W@D@ ~~@(lD~W[Q)
D DW o POTWf\NWTP o State: o Other:----
o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data)
Format:, ___ _ o LEVEL IV o NELAC
a ~ "'O",~ ~al;gOI Ci> ._> 0 >.(;5 ~(/)~~$: O$:= til 0> ~o<l:~lg~ ° .... U-II <= ~HI~~ ~ ~ 0).: ii) $: ~a.o<l:l~O J ~ ~ >1 '(
(/) ....
~ ~--S-AM--P-lE--ID-E-N-T-IF-IC-A-T-IO-N--~------~r-------r-----~, ~
It'Jame. Location. Inte_rval, etc.) "';;;:
'mw.-14 I g·?O ·/1 11.?3D 12 -w I xl xix
2mIAJ '_~2 /K10 /I In a£' 1 /-1AJ I x iX
31l1lAf -& ~ , "'·30 -II I fill) I ) ~ IrJ I X I X
4/hW. 2~ I q ·Ja.f / IMt{S' I/-w I'X lx
5 1YJN , s,~ 1~,?o'lI I) ~35' I J-~ lx Ix
_intv -Zh If(' JtJ -// II n(} I J -vV_ I X lX
7
8
9
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Ord~ ..
o ~ I R w .-
I ;-
() c;
« ~ I U
I-m
l-E « ::J
W ~ I 5 w .... til
(J) -g ro U5 I H
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
Comments:
~YcSS A0ha.,
1f!/t11r/:', $ N~TTJ(~
~;"ul l~
~h. e/bLiO
-SliIpptKltiy: a-$xJ}
Cooler 10(s):
c..L "Cn)
ReceiptTemp 8/~ J:..
;). 3 °c
Cnlee: @N
Custody Seal
On Bottle Y N
On Cooler (!) N
Intact
Signature
Match
~
~ ~ nn n
~ <:::;,
~
tgS
lO)
tl===> I~ ~ 'B
@N 8N
"U • 10
~-IId1CV~\
III ! ICUstodY ~ I Rf!Ql1ved by (print):
a Record [ -ReCeived by (pilfll):
0
nal ;
.~ MUSTbe
a Signed SaflllllilDlsQ9Sal: Return to Client: ------Lab Disposal:
I ~~vadlLa::,o~
Daiemme: S(gnafure'
DatnlTime: Signature·
-u8telTTme:
7-1-1/ q, J() lSlgnalUfll:
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data witt be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
EI\ERGY
/\-!.lFI ~r :'..J~11 '_,
www.energylab.com
AM/ftiI2I EmIMnu ShIU 1fS.Z
Halena, MT 877-412-0111 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WV 818-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-&90-2218
October 04, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11090914
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 3 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 9/23/2011 for analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11090914-001 MW-18 09/21/11 15:00 09/23/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11090914-002 MW-70 09/21/11 15:00 09/23/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11090914-003 Temp Blank 09/21/11 0:00 09/23/11 Aqueous Temperature
The analyses presented in this report were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper,
WY 82601, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory
Analytical Report, the QNQC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
c3¥~ £) uJtJ.~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011.10.04 15:32:29 -06:00
Page 1 of 8
WWN.energy1ab.com
AM/tfIaI braIIMa SIRu IIIZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WY 888-235-D515
GlfIatte WY 8&8·&86·7175 • Ra Id C' so 888·672·1225 • Colle e Station, TX 888·690-221 a
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Report Date: 10104/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11090914 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 8
EI\ERGY
1\-\(11-1/1 10141 '.
www.energylab.com
AM/ffia/ E-n.-SIDa UBI
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, 'NY 888-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 81&-18&-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Thallium
Sample 10: LFB
Thallium
Sample 10: C11090914-002AMS4
Thallium
Sample 10: C11090914-002AMSO
Thallium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Thallium
Sample 10: LFB
Thallium
Sample 10: C11090790-005BMS4
Thallium
Sample 10: C11090790-005BMSO
Thallium
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0448 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0530 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0571 mg/L
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0499 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0478 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0458 mg/L
Report Date: 10/04/11
Work Order: C11090914
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0926B
0.00050
Run: ICPMS2-C_110926B
0.0010 90 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0926B
0.0010 99 70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0926B
0.0010 107 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0929C
0.00050
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0929C
0.0010 100 85 115
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0929C
0.0010 96 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_110929C
0.0010 92 70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
7.3
4.2
Batch: R151127
09/26/11 20:16
09/26/11 20:19
09/27/11 07:50
09/27/11 07:53
20
Batch: R151331A
09/29/11 16 :45
09/29/11 16 :50
09/30/11 11 :05
09/30/11 11:10
20
Page 6 of 8
EN:RGY
l\_j(lL./'l1 <ill <
www.energylab.com
AMITtIaI~S/nU 1m
Helena, MTB77-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillette, WV 816-881-7175 · Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 · Collage Station, TX 888-690-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
11111111111111111111111111111111 11111 ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
C11090914
Login completed by: Edith McPike
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 9/26/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample laibels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptaible upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes III
Yes III
Yes 0
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
2.4 "C On Ice
Yes 0
Yes III
Date Received: 9/23/2011
Received by: kg
Carrier NDA
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present III
No VOA vials submitted III
Not Applicaible 0
Page 7 of 8
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record
LARORATOR/{ S
Compa~t.:! .. mTle: • 1111 '
1 ~Ilq,\) 'f/(Jorej
Report Mail Ad'ft;S: rror D-{}-~
fAJ4M;V1 ./!\ IILI
Invoice Address:" .:.J
-~r.:l'-'"
~4s-/L
PLEASE PRINT (Pro",jde as much Information as~ssible.)
proieclame, PWS, Permit, Etc, 1 Sample Origin
II' s.r;:lr1.LlV' L~AU1.e( 1Jf./~ State: /AI
Contact Name: -Phone!Fax: Email:
M6t ",,;1ty.{rL ~ ttf ezzL
InvoicelContact & Phone: I Purchase Order:
~w--t
Page ---L-of J-
EPNState Compliance:
Yes w-No D
Sampler: (Please Print)
~~jj~.
Quote/Bottle Ord~
..L\.~
Special Report/Formats:
Dow o EDO/EOT(Electronic Data)
~ o .... ~o"'~ c:: 1ll"O~' .... ._>=UI(l) !9 0 >0-cCl)~ ~~ 8~'8 ~ C> ~o<U)~2 .S
~\1@D@ m@QD~'iJ@J]) ..
o ~I R w !::..
I "0
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
I SW~p'd by: nJJ...-
.}(!5 ll€S-NVJII
COOler ID{S):
~ ( j'p.-rtf
D POTWfWWTP Format:. ___ _ o State: D LEVEL IV ...... Illl~ ~~~§-c:: "E~Ii6~ o Other:----D NELAC ~ (l).!::1U3:
2
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
(Name, Location, Interval, etc.)
fYjlA ) I K
11101 7-0
3~ M1'l J...1Ih,1'
4 r
5
6
7
e
9
10
Collection
Dale
Collection
Time
111'111· II I L ~,()f,
Zo..«IOlO !ij ~I
CI)
MATRIX
/-/,v
iIflLI·// 11£. (.C 1 J ' w
i.. .1J.b..l {rj}YJ.ItHM.' ~D v I· U'~
r
Custody /J Jl)
~ ~ I U
~
l-e: « 5
W ~ I S W III
CIJ "0
~
e: to
en I H
Comments:
X
X
RecelYCd by (pri,",): DaleFrtme:
~tl(;elptfamp
rJ .. !l °c
On Ice: ~N
Custody Seal
On 80lUe Y N
OnCoaler r7
Intact Y N
Signature Y N
Match .
~.
~ ~.
~ ~ ~ (6)
Ii=:: ~ ~ Q
@' IGii
WdU&"
Signature:
Record R<3CB by (print); DalefTlme; Signature;
MUST be . r--------------------------------------------------------r~~~~~v~~y~~~~~~:~----~~~~----~q~------~~~~ur~e:-------------.
Signed Sal11QlE! plsposal: Return to Client: _Lab Disposal: ; ').. () Ifn"<f)'~ 5n::...
I
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy Laboratories. Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub·contr8f;t data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
VISit our web site at www.energylab.com for additlonsl information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
EN:RGY
L .H l_ 1'1" I '): 'It.·~
October 06, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
www.energylab.com
AM/fIIaI ~ SIJIcs 11152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GiIIBHB, WY 856-186-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
Workorder No.: C 11 080269 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 11 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 8/5/2011 for analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Col/ect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11080269-001 MW-24 08/04/11 7:45 08/05/11
C11080269-003 MW-11 08/03/11 10:25 08/05/11
C11080269-004 MW-14 08/03/11 13:3508/05/11
C11080269-005 MW-25 08/03/11 10:45 08/05/11
C11080269-006 MW-26 08/03/11 8:35 08/05/11
C11080269-007 MW-30 08/03/11 14:45 08/05/11
Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
Aqueous Same As Above
Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
Page 1 of 35
E"-ERGY
! '''bon A I ")..--I~ ~
C 11 080269-008 MW -31
C11080269-009 MW-35
C11 080269-01 0 MW-65
www.energyleb.com
AMIfIJaI rn:.n-. SIRu IIJU
Halena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 816-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
08/02/11 14:00 08/05/11
08/02/11 14:30 08/05/11
08/03/11 8:35 08/05/11
Aqueous Same As Above
Aqueous Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VQCs, Standard List
Aqueous Same As Above
C11080269-011 Trip Blank 6092 08/03/11 0:00 08/05/11 Aqueous SW8260B VQCs, Standard List
C11080269-012 Temp Blank 08/05/11 Aqueous Temperature
The analyses presented in this report were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper,
WY 82601, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory
Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing . All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
c3t.?~ D uJtJ.~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011.10.0711:51:13-06:00
Page 2 of 35
l'tWW.energytab.CDm
AMIftIaI Exe.1IInu SWu ,ftZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette WY 866-686-1175 • Ra id Cl so 888-672-1225 • Colle e Station IX 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Sample Delivery Group: C11080269
REVISED/SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT (2)
Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
CASE NARRATIVE
The attached analytical report has been revised from a previously submitted report due to the request by Kathy Weinel on
October 6, 2011 to not report the following analytes due to unacceptable pH levels at the time of sample receipt: Gross
Alpha on MW-32, MW-14, MW-65, MW-25, MW-35, MW-26; Dissolved Metals on MW-14, MW-65, MW-25, MW-35, MW-26;
Nitrate and Ammonia on MW -14.
REVISED/SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT (1)
The attached analytical report has been revised from a previously submitted report due to the request by Kathy Weinel on
September 9, 2011 to correct the Vanadium report limit in the Method Blank.
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIUSOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 3 of 35
EN:RGY
'_/\':;-,(lP ',1 ')Hlr So
www.energylab.com
~/Exc.n.-SInu '152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, wy 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: Cll080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2320 B
Sample 10: MBLK 3 Method Blank
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 ND mg/L
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 2.46 mg/L
Sample 10: LCS Laboratory Control Sample
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 199 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080269-008AOUP 3 Sample Duplicate
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 164 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 200 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080269-008AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 286 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: R149013
Run: MANTECH_11080SA 08/0S/11 08 :06
S.O
1.0
1.0
Run: MANTECH_ll080SA 08/0S/11 08:22
S.O 99 90 110
Run: MANTECH_ll080SA 08/0S/11 19 :48
S.O 0.8 10
S.O 10
S.O 0.8 10
Run: MANTECH_ll 080SA 08/0S/11 19:56
S.O 98 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 18 of 35
EN:RGY
_ l-" ~ [i'}\ I ilL.
www.energylab.com
~/Ex"",-SIr!u /951
Helena, lIT 877-412-0111 • Billings, lIT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gilletto, WY 818-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: C11080269-o06AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3200 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080274-005BMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3570 mg/L
Sample 10: LCS2_ Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1030 mg/L
Sample 10: MBLK2_ Method Blank
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C ND mg/L
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLK1_ Method Blank
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS1_ Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1100 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080358-o02AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 412 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080389-o01BMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2430 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R149109
Run: BAL-1 _110805C 08/05/11 17 :23
10 0.4 10
Run: BAL-1 _110805C 08/05/11 17:27
10 104 90 110
Run: BAL-1 110805C 08/05/11 17:27 -
10 103 90 110
Run: BAL-1 110805C 08/05/11 17:28 -
10
Batch: R149222
Run: BAL-1_110809B 08/09/11 16 :03
10
Run: BAL-1_110809B 08/09/11 16:03
10 110 90 110
Run: BAL-1 _110809B 08/09/11 16 :07
10 0.1 10
Run: BAL-1_1108098 08/09/11 16 :09
10 101 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 19 of 35
EI\ERGY
L,\EJ I '",I _,'-1_ '-
www.energylab.com
AM/fIbI &r.1IHa stnu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, 'NY 888-235-0515
Gil/etta, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • Col/ege Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-S/10/2011 Method Blank
Chloride ND mg/L
Sample 10: C110S01SS-G01AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Chloride 45.9 mg/L
Sample 10: C110S0188-G01AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Chloride 45.9 mg/L
Sample 10: LCS35-8/10/2011 Laboratory Control Sample
Chloride 3530 mg/L
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-11/0S/22 Method Blank
Chloride ND mg/L
Sample 10: C110S0415-G01AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Chloride 81.1 mg/L
Sample 10: C110S0415-G01AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Chloride 81.1 mg/L
Sample 10: LCS35-11/0S/22 Laboratory Control Sample
Chloride 3560 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: 8/10/2011-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_110810A 08/10/11 11 :52
1.0
Run: TITRATION_110B10A OB/10/11 12:51
1.0 102 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110810A 08/10/11 12:52
1.0 102 90 110 0.0 10
Run: TITRATION_110B10A 08/10/11 12:55
1.0 100 90 110
Batch: 11/08/22-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_11 OB22A 08/22/11 11:10
1.0
Run: TITRATION_11 0822A 08/22/11 11 :56
1.0 104 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110822A 08/22/11 11 :58
1.0 104 90 110 0.0 10
Run: TITRATION_11 OB22A 08/22/11 12:35
1.0 100 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 20 of 35
EI\ERGY
L ,\PU I~I',I ':r-d L-:..
W'M'I.energylab.com
AIII/ftfeM Exc.lJMlcl stnu 7952
Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillette, WY 8&6-686-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C 11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-F C
Sample 10: MBLK Method Blank
Fluoride NO mg/L
Sample 10: LCS Laboratory Control Sample
Fluoride 2.00 mg/L
Sample 10: Cl1080269-005AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Fluoride 2.12 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080269-005AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Fluoride 2.08 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: R149053
Run: MANTECH_ll 0808A 08/08/11 11 :02
0.10
Run: MANTECH_l1 0808A 08/08/11 11 :04
0.10 100 90 110
Run: MANTECH_ll0808A 08/08/11 12:37
0.10 91 80 120
Run: MANTECH_ll 0808A 08/08/11 12:39
0.10 89 80 120 1.9 10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 21 of 35
EI\ERGY
:.... E! ':-'1 • I' "'1t.:.3
WWN.energylab.com
AM/ffIa/~SIIru '151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 81&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: A4S00-H B
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10106/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Sample 10: ICV1_110805_2
pH
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Analytical Run: ORION555A_11 0805B
08/05/11 15 :06
Method: A4S00-H B
Sample 10: C11080269-007AOUP
pH
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
6.88 s.u. 0.010 100 98 102
Batch: 11 0805_2_PH-W _555A-1
Sample Duplicate Run: ORION555A_110805B 08/05/11 16:31
7.75 s.u. 0.010 2.9 3
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 22 of 35
EI\ERGY
L :\~ .'1</1' RI ......
www.energylab.com
~/r-1IInCIS/nu '1152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillotte, WY 866-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, l1( 888-&90-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4S00-NH3 G
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.97 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 1.88 mg/L
Sample 10: C110a0269-0100MS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 2.21 mg/L
Sample 10: C110a0269-0100MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N 2.24 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R149215
Run: TECHNICON_11 0811A 08/11/11 12:59
0.050
Run: TECHNICON_110811A 08/11/1113:01
0.050 99 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0811 A 08/11/11 13:03
0.050 96 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_110811A 08/11/11 14:51
0.050 99 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_110811A 08/11/11 14:53
0.050 101 80 120 1.3 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 23 of 35
EI\ERGY
L ~C':~/\, ... ,--!E~
www.energylab.CDm
AMlytJa/~smu /151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GiIIBth, WY 8&&-186-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College StatiDn, TX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4S00-S04 E
Sample 10: LCS-C110822
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-1_110822
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11080269-00SAMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11080269-00SAMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Laboratory Control Sample
4930 mg/L
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
3660 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
3640 mg/L
RL O/OREC Low limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual
Batch: 110B22_1_S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_11 OB22A OB/22/11 15:23
100 103 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110B22A OB/22111 15:25
10
Run: TURB-2_11 OB22A OB/22/11 15:54
100 104 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110B22A OB/22/11 15 :56
100 103 90 110 0.5 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 24 of 35
EI\ERGY
... ABQP,\T OHIt:;S
www.energylab.com
AMIrtkM~ $IIa '/152
Hele~a, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 81&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: E200.7
Result
Sample 10: MB-110815A 5 Method Blank
Calcium ND
Iron ND
Magnesium ND
Potassium ND
Sodium ND
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-110815A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Calcium 48.8 mg/L
Iron 0.977 mg/L
Magnesium 48.2 mg/L
Potassium 44.0 mg/L
Sodium 50.3 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080157-001CMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike
Calcium 115 mg/L
Iron 2.05 mg/L
Magnesium 102 mg/L
Potassium 92.5 mg/L
Sodium 113 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080157-001CMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Calcium 115 mg/L
Iron 2.02 mg/L
Magnesium 102 mg/L
Potassium 93.5 mg/L
Sodium 113 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MOe -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPDLimlt Qual
Batch: R149318
Run: ICP2-C_ll 0815A 08/15/11 11 :59
0.50
0.030
0.50
0.50
0.50
Run: ICP2-C_ll0815A 08/15/11 12 :03
0.50 98 85 115
0.030 98 85 115
0.50 96 85 115
0.50 88 85 115
0.50 101 85 115
Run: ICP2-C_ll0815A 08/15/1 1 13:11
1.0 93 70 130
0.030 97 70 130
1.0 94 70 130
1.0 89 70 130
1.0 100 70 130
Run: ICP2-C_l1 0815A 08/15/1113:15
1.0 93 70 130 0.0 20
0.030 96 70 130 1.3 20
1.0 95 70 130 0.4 20
1.0 90 70 130 1.1 20
1.0 100 70 130 0.2 20
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 25 of 35
EI\ERGY
t_,.~-:)i/ I (:rdE. •
www.energytab.com
AIII/ftkM&~smc. '151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 86&-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Stalion, TX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10106/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: Cll080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R149076A
Sample 10: LRB 17 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0808A 08/08/11 13 :43
Arsenic NO mg/L 0.0050
Beryllium NO mg/L 0.00050
Cadmium NO mg/L 0.00050
Chromium NO mg/L 0.020
Cobalt NO mg/L 0.010
Copper NO mg/L 0.010
Lead NO mg/L 0.0010
Manganese NO mg/L 0.010
Mercury NO mg/L 0.00050
Molybdenum NO mg/L 0.010
Nickel NO mg/L 0.020
Selenium NO mg/L 0.0050
Silver NO mg/L 0.010
Thallium NO mg/L 0.00050
Tin NO mg/L 0.10
Uranium NO mg/L 0.00030
Vanadium NO mg/L 0.010
Sample 10: LFB 17 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0808A 08/08/11 13 :48
Arsenic 0.0549 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Beryllium 0.0544 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Cadmium 0.0542 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Chromium 0.0548 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Cobalt 0.0536 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Copper 0.0555 mg/L 0.0010 111 85 115
Lead 0.0534 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Manganese 0.0539 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Mercury 0.00546 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Molybdenum 0.0545 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Nickel 0.0553 mg/L 0.0010 111 85 115
Selenium 0.0533 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Silver 0.0214 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Thallium 0.0532 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Tin 0.0546 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Uranium 0.0526 mg/L 0.00030 105 85 115
Vanadium 0.0546 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Sample 10: C11080269-010BMS4 17 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS4-C_l1 0808A 08/09/11 08:44
Arsenic 0.0525 mg/L 0.0010 104 70 130
Beryllium 0.0433 mg/L 0.010 87 70 130
Cadmium 0.0486 mg/L 0.010 96 70 130
Chromium 0.0483 mg/L 0.0010 97 70 130
Cobalt 0.0588 mg/L 0.010 102 70 130
Copper 0.0479 mg/L 0.010 95 70 130
Lead 0.0529 mg/L 0.050 106 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 26 of 35
EI\ERGY
_ 8 .... 11/' I '-IE.
www.energylab.CDm
AtIMytIu/ EmIlMa smc. 1951
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillotte, WY 866-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: C11080269-D10BMS4 17 Sample Matrix Spike
Manganese 1.16 mg/L
Mercury 0.00470 mg/L
Molybdenum 0.0552 mg/L
Nickel 0.0589 mg/L
Selenium 0.0653 mg/L
Silver 0.0128 mg/L
Thallium 0.0533 mg/L
Tin 0.0483 mg/L
Uranium 0.118 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0496 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080269-D10BMSO 17 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 0.0535 mg/L
Beryllium 0.0494 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0537 mg/L
Chromium 0.0507 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0650 mg/L
Copper 0.0496 mg/L
Lead 0.0579 mg/L
Manganese 1.24 mg/L
Mercury 0.00500 mg/L
Molybdenum 0.0608 mg/L
Nickel 0.0579 mg/L
Selenium 0.0675 mg/L
Silver 0.0142 mg/L
Thallium 0.0585 mg/L
Tin 0.0552 mg/L
Uranium 0.129 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0525 mg/L
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank
Zinc ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank
Zinc 0.0548 mg/L
Sample 10: C11081007-002CMS4 Sample Matrix Spike
Zinc 0.0557 mg/L
Sample 10: C11081007-002CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Zinc 0.0564 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R149076A
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0808A 08/09/11 08:44
0.010 70 130 A
0.0010 94 70 130
0.0010 105 70 130
0.050 98 70 130
0.0010 113 70 130
0.010 64 70 130 S
0.0010 106 70 130
0.0010 97 70 130
0.00030 103 70 130
0.0010 99 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_110808A 08/09/11 08 :49
0.0010 106 70 130 1.9 20
0.010 99 70 130 13 20
0.010 107 70 130 10.0 20
0.0010 101 70 130 4.9 20
0.010 114 70 130 10.0 20
0.010 99 70 130 3.5 20
0.050 116 70 130 8.9 20
0.010 70 130 6.4 20 A
0.0010 100 70 130 6.2 20
0.0010 116 70 130 9.8 20
0.050 96 70 130 1.7 20
0.0010 117 70 130 3.4 20
0.010 71 70 130 9.7 20
0.0010 116 70 130 9.3 20
0.0010 110 70 130 13 20
0.00030 124 70 130 8.5 20
0.0010 105 70 130 5.6 20
Batch: R150005A
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0830A 08/30/11 12:07
0.010
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0830A 08/30/11 13:21
0.0010 110 85 115
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0830A 08/30/11 20 :17
0.010 102 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_110830A 08/30/11 20:22
0.010 104 70 130 1.2 20
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 27 of 35
EI\ERGY
L \81 I " I' -=-d L."
www.energylab.com
AM/ffial Ex"*,-SInu 1152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 868-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10106/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: C11081143-004CMS4 Sample Matrix Spike
Zinc 0.0554 mg/L
Sample 10: C11081143-004CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Zinc 0.0540 mg/L
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank
Zinc ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank
Zinc 0.0575 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High limit
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0B31A
0.010 110 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0B31A
0.010 107 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_110831A
0.010
Run: ICPMS4-C_l1 OB31 A
0.0010 113 B5 115
ND -Not detected at Ihe reporting limit.
RPO RPDLimit Qual
Batch: R150075A
OB/31/11 13 :17
OB/31/11 13:21
2.6 20
OB/31/1t 16:20
08/31/11 16:25
Page 28 of 35
EI\ERGY
.... "S·_'I· .11.'=<1=-.-
www.energylab.CDm
AMIftIu/ Ext:dlnu Slnu 1151
Helena, MT 877-472-071 1 • Biliines, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • Colleee Station, IX 888-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.55 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.90 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080272'{)01 BMS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.00 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080272'{)01BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.06 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Batch: R149052
Run: TECHNICON_ll OBOBA OB/08/11 12:57
0.10
Run: TECHNICON_ll 0808A 08/08/11 13:00
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_ll 0808A 08/08/11 13 :02
0.10 97 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_ll 0808A 08/08/11 13 :30
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_ll 080BA 08/08/11 13:32
0.10 105 90 110 3.0 10
ND • Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 29 of 35
EI\ERGY
_,\l ,1 '["::"'1 ' ~'I' r
===--_. ml" www.energylab.com
AM~I ru.nwa SI1Ic. list
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 816-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-172-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: E900.1
Result Units
Sample 10: MB-GA-0463
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0463
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C11080269'()02AMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C11080269'()02AMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
0.444 pCi/L
0.647
0.977
pCi/L
pCi/L
Laboratory Control Sample
21.8 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike
38.4 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
36.7 pCi/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1_110817A
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1_110817A
91 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 110817A -71 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 110817A -
67 70 130 4.4
Batch: GA-0463
08/18/11 11 :33
U
08/18/11 11 :33
08/18/11 13:23
08/18/11 13:23
33.6 S
-Spike response is outside of the acceptance range for this analysis. Since the LeS and the RPD for the MS MSD pair are acceptable. the response is considered to be
matrix related. The batch is approved.
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 30 of 35
EN:RGY
_!\t:"10HI\TOHIES
www.energyiab.com
AtIMfIJaI m.J/wru SInu 11151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 86&-18&-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 881-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/01/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11080269
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R149095
Sample 10: 08081CLCS3 16 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SATURNCA_110BOBA OB/OB/11 14 :23
Acetone 110 ug/L 20 110 70 130
Benzene B.9 ug/L 1.0 B9 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride B.5 ug/L 1.0 B5 70 130
Chloroform B.B ug/L 1.0 BB 70 130
Chloromethane 8.B ug/L 1.0 B8 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 1B ug/L 1.0 BB 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 96 ug/L 20 96 70 130
Methylene chloride 9.9 ug/L 1.0 99 70 130
Naphthalene 9.8 ug/L 1.0 98 70 130
o-Xylene 8.8 ug/L 1.0 B8 70 130
Toluene 8.6 ug/L 1.0 B6 70 130
Xylenes, Total 26 ug/L 1.0 88 70 130
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 9B 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 96 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 96 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 92 BO 120
Sample 10: OSOS11_MBLK_6 16 Method Blank Run: SATURNCA_l1 0808A OB/08/11 15 :36
Acetone NO ug/L 20
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
a-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 96 BO 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 96 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 BB BO 120
Surr: Toluene-dB 1.0 B6 80 120
Sample 10: C11080203-001GMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_l1080BA 08/0B/11 21 :40
Acetone 2400 ug/L 200 119 70 130
Benzene 190 ug/L 10 96 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 200 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Chloroform 210 ug/L 10 104 70 130
Chloromethane 200 ug/L 10 102 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 410 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 2200 ug/L 200 111 70 130
Methylene chloride 240 ug/L 10 119 70 130
Naphthalene 200 ug/L 10 99 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 31 of 35
EN:RGY
1 ,~:J R',ICtHIL _
www.energylab.com
AIIIIyta/ rxun.-SII!u 1952
Hele~a, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, W'f 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Report Date: 09/01/11
Work Order: C11080269
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: SW8260B
Result Units
Sample 10: C11080203-001GMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike
a-Xylene 200 ug/L
Toluene 190 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 610 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C11080203-001GMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Acetone 2600 ug/L
Benzene 190 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 200 ug/L
Chloroform 210 ug/L
Chloromethane 210 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 420 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 2300 ug/L
Methylene chloride 230 ug/L
Naphthalene 220 ug/L
a-Xylene 200 ug/L
Toluene 190 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 620 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R149095
Run: SATURNCA_11 0808A 08/08/11 21 :40
10 102 70 130
10 94 70 130
10 102 70 130
1.0 102 80 120
1.0 108 70 130
1.0 95 80 120
1.0 87 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_110808A 08/08/11 22:16
200 129 70 130
10 96 70 130
10 102 70 130
10 105 70 130
10 106 70 130
10 105 70 130
200 114 70 130
10 117 70 130
10 108 70 130
10 102 70 130
10 94 70 130
10 104 70 130
1.0 103 80 120
1.0 106 70 130
1.0 99 80 120
1.0 89 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 32 of 35
EN:RGY
~~I 8 _lr-l, I' ; 'IL:"
www.energylab.com
Aq./ytful EsuJ/tnc, Sine. 1151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WV 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 86&-686-1115 · Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 . College station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch Revised Date: 10/06/11
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/01/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11080269
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R149192
Sample 10: 08101CLCS_4 5 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SATURNCA_l10810B 08/10/11 12:42
Chloroform 9.2 ug/L 1.0 92 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 99 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 95 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 96 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 87 80 120
Sample 10: 081011_MBLK_6 5 Method Blank Run: SATURNCA_ll 081 OB 08/10/11 13:54
Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 98 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 96 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 90 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 85 80 120
Sample 10: C11080188-001PMS 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_ll0810B 08/10/11 19:57
Chloroform 230 ug/L 10 116 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 108 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 112 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 104 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 88 80 120
Sample 10: C11080188-001PMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SATURNCA_ 110810B 08/10/11 20:34
Chloroform 240 ug/L 10 118 70 130 2.4 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 110 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 116 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 102 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 85 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 33 of 35
EI\ERGY
L ,HOH ,I (,)HIl.'...i
~-www.energylab.com
~ AMIyrIeM~~ IIJZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735-4489 • Caspar, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 866·686·7175 · Rapid CIiy, SO 888·&72·1225 • College Station, TX 888·&90·2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
I ~1I111111111111 ~I~ III~ III~ 1111111111111111111111
C110B0269
Login completed by: Edith McPike
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 8/9/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody Signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper containerlbottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
4.2'C On Ice
Yes 0"
Yes 0
Date Received: 8/5/2011
Received by: jba
Carrier FedEx
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
NoO
NoO
No 0
No 0
NoO
No 0
Naill
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0"
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable 0
-" -------,------------,-,------------------_._----------------... -----------_._----------------_._---
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
Sample MW-14 for nitrate and ammonia was received with a pH of 5; 1 mL of H2S04 was added to sample in
the laboratory for a final pH of <2. Samples MW-32, MW·14, MW-65, MW-25, MW-35, for gross alpha and
dissolved metals was received with a pH of 5; 2 mL of HN03 was added to samples in the laboratory for a final
pH of <2. Sample MW-26 for gross alpha and dissolved metals was received with a pH of 4; 1 mL of HN03 was
added to sample in the laboratory for a final pH 01<2.
Page 34 of 35
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record 'ftm(f07 • .at'@?IU,'/I'
Company Name:
D~n~£.of\ M~f\es
Report Mail Address: PO BO')t ~O~
51~l\J:lr,-u \}..T M511
Invoice Addres~
SG\flle
PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Project Name, PWS, Pennit, Etc. I Sample Origin
31"J Qv..o..rte.C G-roVJ1d W~+er ;;"0 If State: \$I
Contact Name: Phone/Fax:
RjM P6..)me,r Q3S '7$ :2.2..2 \
Invoice Contact & Phone:
-s't\fYlC
Email:
Purchase Order:
Page_1_of~
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes ff No 0
Sampler: (Please Print)
-';'Mer H"J);JlAt
Quote/Bottle Order: -v
~ '1@O@ [;a~®QDrn®1f~® Special Report/Formats: !: ., Contact ELI prior to ShIpped by:
RUSH sample submittal rcdfK~!
DDW D POTWfWWTP D State: D Other:----
o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data)
Format:. ___ _ o LEVEL IV o NELAC
a .... lCO",~ :gco;gOI iu 'Bi>S >-rti c(l)-;;,l.lJ3: 8~'8 ~ g' _«(1)1·-.-o .... COIt§ ,-W~c ·t:: ~~I~~ ~~«Ig,~
E >1 ~
o
.:f
1t-<t
../ ~
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION . ~
jName, Location, Interval. etc.) ........
MW-24 liJ4hl 01LlT:\ J-W '{I'"
2 Mw·~ l-W 'i ~LUll _130..5
3 /'-\w-J J b-W 'f. !!hblli JO~
4 Mw-I,", .13305 (., -'vJ t ltJ3/Jl
5 Mw-:l5 1 ~/3111 J()~ b-W y.
6 J.J. 'W -;:u;". 1&/3/11 o~35 6-W x
7
JJ\W..-30 1 ~3/1l \4~ b-W ~
8 )AI-oJ -3\ !ft,/~Il \'-\00 b.-W lX
9 MW-~S !)sI.lIil IY3() £-w x
10 M~b.S .. _ !~h:JlI l Og3S Ib-W IX Custody I RelinquishOO by (pmt~ DatelTlme' S.gniilure;
t-r ... M.' ll..Jl;J..,...,. (i.I~)H IDCL .:::J~ JlJIfL/\
0 I=" < w t.. I "0
() e :l <.( e I-III
l-e ....
<.( :l r-
W 'E W ro en "0 e j!! en
ReceiVild by (pnntl'
ReceiVed by (print):
R for charges and I scheduling -See
Instruction Page
U I Comments:
5
/\ {', '? v.. b,;g..
H I ~ \oJ. 2J.~
'yf' !JtJf2
~/ A///a:c;
Cooler IDrs):
:3
DC
On Ice: roN
Custody s.al~~ OnBollJe N
On Cooler N
Intact N
Signature 0,
Match <-.!/"
~ ~ ~. ~ ."'§.
~ ~ (9i
~
~ Q. aYJj@fcbq6<J.
f::!
OatelTime: --, ._.. --Signafure:
Oale:rrrme: Signatura: Record ·ReGnqiiisnoo"bY (p1fnljiJ OateITrne:·~ ·--~--::JSig.natwe:
MUSTber-----------------------------__ ~~~~--~~~------~=c~----~ S. eel a ;me. no ute; Ign SamPle DiSposal: RelUrn toClient:_ __ _ Lab Disposal: __ q_·S __ 11 !t./O
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy Laboratories. Inc. may be sUbcontract~ to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
VBit our web site at www.energy!ab.com for additional information. downloadable fee schedule. forms. and links.
www.energytab.com EN:RGY
I' -111 .,,1 )1;1 , __ /f.R:dlllaSiu'1IZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-1515
Gillette, WY 811-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 881-&90-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
September 14, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C 11 080529 Quote 10: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 14 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 8/12/2011 for
analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11080529-001 MW-2 08/08/11 13:30 08/12/11
C11080529-002 MW-3 08/10/11 9:50 08/12/11
C11080529-003 MW-3A 08/11/11 7:35 08/12/11
C11080529-004 MW-5 08/09/11 11 :05 08/12/11
C11080529-005 MW-12 08/09/11 7:35 08/12/11
C11080529-006 MW-18 08/10/11 14:20 08/12/11
C11080529-007 MW-27 08/08/11 12:20 08/12/11
C11080529-008 MW-28 08/08/11 11 :20 08/12/11
C11080529-009 MW-29 08/09/11 9 :45 08/12/11
C11 080529-01 0 MW-36 08/09/11 11 :50 08/12/11
C11080529-011 MW-37 08/11/11 8:15 08/12/11
C11080529-012 MW-70 08/10/11 14:20 08/12111
C11080529-013 Trip Blank (6092) 08/09/11 0 :00 08/12/11
C11080529-014 Temp Blank 08/12/11
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Fluoride
Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Same As Above
Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
Aqueous Chloride
Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VQCs, Standard List
Aqueous Same As Above
Aqueous Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
Aqueous Temperature
Page 1 of 38
EN:RGY
I\"""1L)\I,<I' 1-11 "
www.energylab.com
AIfII1I/I:M~" 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, NT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-188-7175 • RapId CIty, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 . Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QAlQC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated. Samples corrected for dry weight indicate units that have -dry appended.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
c3¥~ £) <JtAi~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011.09.14 13:48:38 -06:00
Page 2 of 38
www.energytab.com
AM/ftkMEIraIIwa .. ltil
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Caspar, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette WY 866·686-7175 • Ra Id C ,SD 888-672-1225 • Colle a Station IX 888-610-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Report Date: 09/14/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11080529 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are NO (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SO
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 3 of 38
EN:RGY
~"-'UI~ '\1 CHI ....
www.energylab.com
AM~ExA/lwaSlilu 1m Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • BIllings, MT 801-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 811-68B· 7175 • Rapid City, SD 88B·&12·1225 • College Station, TX B88·690·2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte
Method: A2320 B
Sample 10: MBLK
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Count Result
3 Method Blank
ND
ND
ND
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: LCS Laboratory Control Sample
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 199 mg/L
Sample 10: C110a0530-002AOUP 3 Sample Duplicate
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 116 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 142 mg/L
Sample 10: C110a0530-002AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 240 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: C11080529
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Batch: R149273
Run: MANTECH_110812A 08/12/11 14:34
1.0
1.0
1.0
Run: MANTECH_110812A 08/12/11 14:46
5.0 100 90 110
Run: MANTECH_110812A 08/12/11 19:22
5.0 0.3 10
5.0 10
5.0 0.3 10
Run: MANTECH_110812A 08/12/11 19:30
5.0 99 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 20 of 38
EN:RGY
1\· .:)f.;/d 8.~1 ~
www.energylab.com
ARI1fIaI rxr.tIIM:I $IIIu I/IU
Helena, MY 877-412-0711 • Billings, NT 800·135·4489 . Casper, WY 888·235-1515
Gillatta, WY 81&·181· 7115 • Rapid City, so 888·872-1225 • Collage Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLKC
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS1 Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 978 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080529-003AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 5780 mg/L
Sample 10: C11080549-005AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3300 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDe -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: C11080529
RL %REC Low Limit High limit
Run: BAL-l_ll0815D
10
Run: BAL-l_ll0815D
10 98 90 110
Run: BAL-l 110815D -
17
Run: BAL-l_110815D
10 102 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.4
Batch: R149362
08/12/11 16:32
08/12/11 16:32
08/12/11 16:33
10
08/12/11 16:39
Page 21 of 38
EI\ERGY
,\. :ul1"" 81 ~jI <.
www.energylab.com
~ ElaIIItIu SIIIu '151
Helena, lIT 871-412-0711 • Billings, lIT 800-135-4489 • Casper, 'NY 888-235-0515
GillattB, 'NY 888-888-1115 • Rapid City, SO 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-11/0S/22
Chloride
Sample 10: C110S0415-001AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C110S0415-001AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-11/0S/22
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
81 .1 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
81.1 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3560 mg/L
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: C 11080529
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Batch: 11/08/22-CL-TTR-W
Run : TITRATION_ll 0822A 08/22111 11:10
1.0
Run: TITRATION_"0822A 08/22/11 11 :56
1.0 104 90 110
Run: TITRATION_"0822A 08/22/11 11 :58
1.0 104 90 110 0.0 10
Run : TITRATION_11 0822A 08/22/11 12 :35
1.0 100 90 110
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 22 of 38
EN:RGY
;'· ..... dl·/Il r: rll ~
www.energy1ab.com
AR/!IkII~ SInu IIU
Helena, r.rr 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillotta, WY 888-886-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-F C
Sample 10: MBLK
Fluoride
Sample 10: LCS
Fluoride
Sample 10: C110B0549-004AMS
Fluoride
Sample 10: C11080549-004AMSO
Fluoride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
2.04 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
1.96 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
1.96 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO
Run: MANTECH_110815A
0.10
Run : MANTECH_110815A
0.10 102 90 110
Run: MANTECH_110815A
0.10 98 80 120
Run: MANTECH_11 0815A
0.10 98 80 120 0.0
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
09/14/11
C11080529
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R149305
08/15/1111:12
08/15/11 11:17
08/15/11 11 :57
08/15/11 11 :59
10
Page 23 of 38
www.energyiab.com EN:RGY
~I\ ""')Oi~J\1 :--,I~lf ~; AH/fIIaI fI.aIIMa SInA //IIZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOO-735-4489 • Casper, WY BBB-235-0515
Gillatta, WY BBB-BBB-7175 • Rapid City, SO B88-&72-1225 • College StatiDn, 1)( 888-690-2218
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: A4500-H B
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: C11080529
Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Sample 10: ICV1_110812_2
pH
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Analytical Run : ORION555A_1108128
08/12/11 14:31
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: C110B0529"()11AOUP
pH
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
6.90 s.u. 0.010 101 98 102
Sample Duplicate Run: ORION555A_1108128
7.70 S.U. 0.010
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit
2.2
08/12/11 15:28
3
Page 24 of 38
EI\ERGY
iI.' .')P;\,I (~I~I' :)
www.ener&Y1ab.com
bI/fffaI ~ SIIa ,fISt
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOO-735-4489 • Casper, WY 88B-235-1515
Gillalta, WY 11&-&88-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-NH3 G
Sample 10: MBLK-1
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: LCS-2
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: LFB-3
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: C11080549-0050MS
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: C11080549-0050MSO
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
1.98 mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
1.99 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
1.91 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
1.88 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low limit High limit RPO
Run: TECHNICON_11 0815A
0.050
Run: TECHNICON_11 0815A
0.050 98 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_110815A
0.050 101 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_11 0815A
0.050 97 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_110815A
0.050 96 80 120 1.6
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
09/14/11
C11080529
RPOlimit Qual
Batch: R149306
08/15/11 12:35
08/15/11 12:37
08/15/11 12:39
08/15/11 13:01
08/15/11 13:03
10
Page 25 of 38
EN:RGY
1\ .... 0 1 U\I ~I"'I ~,
www.energylab.com
AH/fIIaIr-a.-.. /lBI
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • 81111ngs, MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 818-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 • Collogo Station, TX 881-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-S04 E
Sample 10: LCS-1_110822
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-C110822
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11080529-D12AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11080529-D12AMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Laboratory Control Sample
4930 mg/L
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
3840 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
3840 mg/L
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: C11080529
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 11 0822_1_S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_11 0822A 08/22/11 15:23
100 103 90 110
Run: TU RB-2_11 0822A 08/22/11 15:25
10
Run: TURB-2_110822A 08/22/11 17:17
100 101 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110822A 08/22/11 17:19
100 101 90 110 0.0 10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 26 of 38
EI\ERGY
I\~'OP,\I ':..)HI 'J
www.energylab.com
u./fIIaI r-s.-SIIIu IIBI
Helene, MT 871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillatta, WY 8&B-18&-7115 • Rapid City, so 888-672-1225 • College StatiDn, 1X 888-610-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/14/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11080529
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.7 Batch: R149514
Sample 10: MB-110818A 5 Method Blank Run: ICP2-C_110B1BA 08/18/11 13:12
Calcium ND mg/L 0.60
Iron ND mg/L 0.030
Magnesium ND mg/L 0.50
Potassium ND mg/L 0.50
Sodium ND mg/L 0.90
Sample 10: LFB-110818A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP2-C_110B1BA 08/18/11 13:16
Calcium 48.1 mg/L 0.50 96 85 115
Iron 0.938 mg/L 0.030 94 85 115
Magnesium 47.8 mg/L 0.50 96 85 115
Potassium 44.5 mg/L 0.50 89 85 115
Sodium 49.6 mg/L 0.50 99 85 115
Sample 10: C11080659-003BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP2-C_11 0818A 08/18/11 15:35
Calcium 113 mg/L 1.0 95 70 130
Iron 2.08 mg/L 0.030 98 70 130
Magnesium 101 mg/L 1.0 96 70 130
Potassium 94.5 mg/L 1.0 91 70 130
Sodium 105 mg/L 1.0 98 70 130
Sample 10: C11080659-003BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP2-C_110818A 08/18/11 15:39
Calcium 110 mg/L 1.0 93 70 130 2.5 20
Iron 2.07 mg/L 0.030 98 70 130 0.8 20
Magnesium 97.2 mg/L 1.0 92 70 130 3.4 20
Potassium 89.0 mg/L 1.0 86 70 130 5.9 20
Sodium 103 mg/L 1.0 96 70 130 1.7 20
Method: E200.7 Batch: R150560
Sample 10: MB-110910A Method Blank Run: ICP2-C_11 0912A 09/12/11 10:32
Iron ND mg/L 0.030
Sample 10: LFB-110910A Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP2-C_110912A 09/12/11 10:36
Iron 0.928 mg/L 0.030 93 85 115
Sample 10: C11090256-002AMS2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP2-C_11 0912A 09/12111 20 :55
Iron 2.01 mg/L 0.030 99 70 130
Sample 10: C11090256-002AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP2-C_110912A 09/12/11 20 :59
Iron 1.95 mg/L 0.030 95 70 130 3.2 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 27 of 38
EI\ERGY
,\-'OI .I\I ')h'I,_:",
www.energytab.com
Au/fIIcII EIuIMw SInu IISI
Halena, MY 877-412-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-186-1115 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • Collage Station, 1X 888-610-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Uranium
Sample 10: LFB
Uranium
Sample 10: C11080445-008AMS4
Uranium
Count Result Units
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0523 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0988 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: C11080529
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLlmit Qual
0.00030
0.00030 105
0.00030 109
Run: ICPMS2-C_110817A
Run: ICPMS2-C_110817A
85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0817A
70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0817A
Batch: R149442
08/17/11 12:24
08/17/11 12:25
08/17/11 16:12
Sample 10: C11080445-008AMSD
Uranium 0.103 mg/L 0.00030 119 70 130 4.6
08/17/11 16:14
20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 28 of 38
www.energy1ab.com
AM/fIIrM ExuIJwIu SInu /152
Helena, MY 877-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, 'NY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&8-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 . College Station, IX 888-690-2218
OA/oe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: C11080557-002CMS4
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Count Result Units
16 Sample Matrix Spike
0.0543 mg/L
0.0474 mg/L
0.0477 mg/L
0.0485 mg/L
0.0493 mg/L
0.0600 mg/L
0.00490 mg/L
0.0515 mg/L
0.0470 mg/L
0.0496
0.0161
0.0501
0.0497
0.0498
0.0492
0.0495
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: C11080557-002CMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 0.0576 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0489 mg/L
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: LRB
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
0.0504 mg/L
0.0508 mg/L
0.0515 mg/L
0.0613 mg/L
0.00529 mg/L
0.0534 mg/L
0.0503 mg/L
0.0505 mg/L
0.0189 mg/L
0.0522 mg/L
0.0519 mg/L
0.0511 mg/L
0.0522 mg/L
0.0525 mg/L
16 Method Blank
ND
ND
mg/L
mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: C11080529
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0013
0.00030
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0013
0.00030
0.0010
0.010
0.0050
0.00050
0.020
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.00050
0.010
0.020
109
95
95
97
99
97
98
100
94
99
81
100
99
100
98
99
115
98
101
102
103
99
106
104
100
101
95
104
104
102
104
105
Run: ICPMS4-C_l1 0816A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS4-C_l10816A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0816A
ND . Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
5.9
3.1
5.5
4.5
4.4
2.1
7.6
3.7
6.8
1.9
16
4.2
4.3
2.5
5.8
5.9
Batch: R149401A
08/17/11 03:00
08/17/11 03:05
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
08/16/11 12:59
Page 29 of 38
EN:RGY
"\r·l)I./~1 )ill' '-
www.energylab.com
AM/ftItM ExeMlttlu Sil¥' 11$1
Helena, MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 8DO-735-4-489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GIIIBtta, WY 818-186-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College station, IX 881-680-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/14/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11080529
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R149401 A
Sample 10: LRB 16 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_110816A 08/16/11 12:59
Selenium ND mg/L 0.0050
Silver ND mg/L 0.010
Thallium NO mg/L 0.00050
Tin ND mg/L 0.10
Uranium ND mg/L 0.00030
Vanadium ND mg/L 0.010
Zinc ND mg/L 0.010
Sample 10: LFB 16 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_110816A 08/16/11 13:04
Arsenic 0.0530 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Cadmium 0.0521 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
Chromium 0.0552 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Copper 0.0553 mg/L 0.0010 111 85 115
Lead 0.0535 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Manganese 0.0542 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Mercury 0.00524 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Molybdenum 0.0531 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Nickel 0.0553 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Selenium 0.0500 mg/L 0.0010 100 85 115
Silver 0.0207 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
Thallium 0.0533 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Tin 0.0533 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Uranium 0.0529 mglL 0.00030 106 85 115
Vanadium 0.0546 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Zinc 0.0543 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Method: E200.8 Batch: R149443A
Sample 10: C11080546-005BMS4 2 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS4-C_110817A 08/17/11 19:35
Cobalt 0.0491 mg/L 0.010 96 70 130
Thallium 0.0548 mg/L 0.0010 109 70 130
Sample 10: C11080546-005BMSO 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS4-C_11 08HA 08/17/11 19:40
Cobalt 0.0512 mg/L 0.010 100 70 130 4.2 20
Thallium 0.0578 mg/L 0.0010 116 70 130 5.5 20
Sample 10: LRB 2 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_110817A 08/17/11 13:22
Cobalt ND mg/L 0.010
Thallium ND mg/L 0.00050
Sample 10: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_110817A 08/17/11 13:27
Cobalt 0.0515 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
Thallium 0.0519 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 30 of 38
EN:RGY
I\~Ol f/\1 sr~IL "
WWN.energylab.com
AR/fIIaI r.-!IMu SI1Iu 1951
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOO-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 886-&8&-7115 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • Collage Station, IX 888-610-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/14/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11080529
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R149486A
Sample 10: C11070839~17BMS4 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS4-C_110818A 08/18/11 21 :50
Beryllium 0.256 mg/L 0.Q10 95 70 130
Lead 0.263 mg/L 0.050 105 70 130
Mercury 0.0240 mg/L 0.0010 96 70 130
Thallium 0.261 mg/L 0.10 104 70 130
Uranium 0.277 mg/L 0.00030 110 70 130
Sample 10: C11070839-017BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0818A 08/18/11 21 :55
Beryllium 0.247 mg/L 0.010 91 70 130 3.8 20
Lead 0.258 mg/L 0.050 103 70 130 2.2 20
Mercury 0.0247 mg/L 0.0010 99 70 130 3.0 20
Thallium 0.257 mg/L 0.10 102 70 130 1.5 20
Uranium 0.271 mg/L 0.00030 108 70 130 2.2 20
Sample 10: LRB 5 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_110818A 08/18/11 11 :25
Beryllium ND mg/L 0.00050
Lead ND mg/L 0.0010
Mercury ND mg/L 0.00050
Thallium ND mg/L 0.00050
Uranium ND mg/L 0.00030
Sample 10: LFB 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_110818A 08/18/11 11 :30
Beryllium 0.0549 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Lead 0.0531 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Mercury 0.00536 mg/L 0.0010 106 85 115
Thallium 0.0536 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Uranium 0.0539 mg/L 0.00030 108 85 115
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 31 of 38
EI\ERGY
A-~".Jn/\r()1 fI '3
www.energylab.com
AHIfIIaI~SfIIu IW
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • BIllings, MY 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-8B8-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-872-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/14/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11080529
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E353.2 Batch: R149379
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method Blank Run: TECHNICON_11 0816A 08/16/11 12:36
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L 0.10
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample Run: TECHNICON_11 0816A 08/16/11 12:58
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.41 mg/L 0.10 96 90 110
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: TECHNICON_110816A 08/16/11 13:01
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.88 mg/L 0.10 96 90 110
Sample 10: C110B0546-0030MS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 0816A 08/16/11 14:41
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.16 mg/L 0.10 102 90 110
Sample 10: C110B0546-0030MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_110816A 08/16/11 14:44
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.22 mg/L 0.10 105 90 110 2.7 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 32 of 38
EI'ERGY
A HOIUd :.)111' ~
www.energyiab.com
AIu/ffIaI E.rulIIIa SIIIu //JU
Helena, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette, WY 8IB·I8&· 7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • College Station, TX 888-610·2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: MB·GA-0464
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Sample 10: LCS·GA·0464
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C110B0274-0010MS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C110B0274-0010MSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
auallfiers:
RL -Analy1e reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
-0.0919 pCi/L
0.0673 pCi/L
0.136 pCi/L
Laboratory Control Sample
23.1 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike
46.4 pCilL
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
47.1 pCi/L
Report Date: 09/14/11
Work Order: Cl1080529
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1_1108170
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 _1108170
98 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 1108170 -
95 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 1108170 -
97 70 130 1.6
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Batch: GA-0464
09/01/11 15:35
U
09/01/11 15:35
09/01/11 15:35
09/01 III 15:35
16
Page 33 of 38
EN:RGY
J\:-10~U\T O'41 ~.
www.energylab.com
~1 EzuIlMu Slnu 1151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-886-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, lX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 09/14/11
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11080529
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R149549
Sample 10: 18-Aug-11_LCS_4 15 Laboratory Control Sample Run: GCMS2_110818B 08/18/11 12:46
Benzene 11 ug/L 1.0 114 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 12 ug/L 1.0 119 70 130
Chloroform 11 ug/L 1.0 114 70 130
Chloromethane 12 ug/L 1.0 116 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 20 ug/L 1.0 100 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 84 ug/L 20 84 70 130
Methylene chloride 10 ug/L 1.0 100 70 130
Naphthalene 10 ug/L 1.0 101 70 130
o-Xylene 10 ug/L 1.0 100 70 130
Toluene 12 ug/L 1.0 115 70 130
Xylenes, Total 30 ug/L 1.0 100 70 130
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 96 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 98 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 110 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 94 80 120
Sample 10: 18-Aug-11_MBLK_6 15 Method Blank Run: GCMS2_11 0818B 08/18/11 13:55
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 104 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 92 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 114 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 93 80 120
Sample 10: C110B0415-001PMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCMS2_11 0818B 08/18/11 19:42
Benzene 220 ug/L 10 110 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 250 ug/L 10 126 70 130
Chloroform 230 ug/L 10 116 70 130
Chloromethane 200 ug/L 10 102 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 390 ug/L 10 99 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 2000 ug/L 200 102 70 130
Methylene chloride 200 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Naphthalene 160 ug/L 10 82 70 130
o-Xylene 200 ug/L 10 98 70 130
Toluene 230 ug/L 10 113 70 130
Xylenes, Total 590 ug/L 10 99 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 34 of 38
EI\ERGY
/\-IOlV .... T::Jr~l:_~
WWN.energylab.com
~Uallwrasmc.I/IU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillotte, WY 886-688-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 . College Station, IX 888-890-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 3rd Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: SW8260B
Sample 10: C11080415-001PMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C11080415-001PMSO 15 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Benzene 230 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 260 ug/L
Chloroform 240 ug/L
Chloromethane 240 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 400 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 2300 ug/L
Methylene chloride 210 ug/L
Naphthalene 210 ug/L
o-Xylene 200 ug/L
Toluene 230 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 600 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDe -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: GCMS2_110818B
1.0 96 80 120
1.0 105 70 130
1.0 105 80 120
1.0 96 80 120
Run: GCMS2_11 0818B
10 114 70 130
10 130 70 130
10 122 70 130
10 121 70 130
10 101 70 130
200 116 70 130
10 106 70 130
10 103 70 130
10 100 70 130
10 116 70 130
10 100 70 130
1.0 99 80 120
1.0 108 70 130
1.0 106 80 120
1.0 95 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
R -RPD exceeds advisory limit.
RPO
2.9
2.8
5.0
17
2.0
13
5.4
23
1.6
2.8
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
09/14/11
C11080529
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R149549
08/18/11 19:42
08/18/11 20:16
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20 R
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
Page 35 of 38
EI\ERGY
i\"l(JI -.I\ I .... ·' .. 1 .~
~ www.energylab.com
~ ~rx~,*-"ShluIW
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 818-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • Coliege Station, TX 881-890-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I
C11080529
Login completed by: Debra Williams
Reviewed by: BL2000\Tedwards
Reviewed Date: 8/17/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
Yes 0
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
2.9"C On Ice
Yes [{]
Yes [{]
Date Received: 8/12/2011
Received by: kg
Carrier FedEx
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
NoD
No 0
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present [{]
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable 0
MW-70 is only being analyzed for Sulfate and TDS, not quote C1640 as indicated on COC per Ryan Palmer
8/12/11.
Page 36 of 38
i)
OJ <C <D
(;.)
-....j
o -(;.) co
IIIlIII!IL • _._. -__ •• ,...... ,-, _ .... -___ ""_V" •••• _, ••• _ ... _ •• __ t.lv __ ._._.,
Company Name: Project Name. PWS. Permit, Etc. Samp!e Origin EPA/State Compliance.: DO\~~()" M~nes. 3r~ QUArtu G-round. WA.~r ;)..01, State: lA, Yes (ii(' No 0
Report Mail Address: Po aC)( gO~ Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
131Ma~lLcl ~-rgLl!;ll ~~tJI,." ?~\m(.C'" \..\~ b7g~1 -r;:""U" }.l6l1;ct,,-'l
Invoice Addr~ Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
SGtt1\t .sAMe
Special Report/Formats: ~';1@[J@ ~QD§@~ ... Contact ELI prior to Shipped by.
3: RUSH sample submittal 'rf£-uJl? 0 Qj ~OUl= [ R for charges and Cooler 100s,.
c:cc;gOI Qj a scheduling -See (/e,,} ._> 0 >.(;j W Instruction Page o OW 0 EDDJEDT(Electronic Data) ~CJ)~ m 3: ~ ::r: "C o POTWIWWTP FORnat: 03:0 co 0> ~ <..> I:: Comments: RecalptTemp
U «CJ)~Q~ ::::l U ~.t1 '0 ... IDII:: ~ ~ DC o State: 0 LEVEL IV •• Q,) c:.t;: J !II o Other: 0 NELAC ~nr~~ , i l-E
tJ'\'W '-C\ On lee: 0)N ~~ ~ ~ ~ « :l
.:) Q,).~ 4)3: ~ .~ ~ .... 5 ZCi..«Ig>o ~ .~ ~ "E Custody Seal E >1 ~ #-,.~ i !II "\~~~ On Bottle ~: co ~ $ ~ '~ "C CJ) ~ .~ ~ c: On COOler
d 1 J 1& d -t s H OY\\~(o(\. Intact Y N '--F ~ en SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX .J1 ~ <-~r Signalu,. G)N (Name, Location,lnterval, etc.) Date Time Match
I X MW-~ s( ... k-\ I 1~30 l-~ ~
2 ~w-3 ~-IQ-\\ 0950 2-W l.,c 'f. ~
3 MW-~A 1{(-1I-" 0,35 2-w .'" f.. 1)( \Q)
hnn
4.MW_~ if(·q-11 1 Hl.1:\ }-\\I -' I ~ ~
5 MW-1c2 ; 5< .. '1. H 073S \-w 'j ~
6 MW-1K '{(-lO-U '11.20 :t-W l ~ '1. Ix ~
7 MW-:J.7 &liJ11 IllO ~-W ~ '"" 'J.. -)( l'i ~ ~
8 f'JIW-U I Kit/II l'~O \-\\1 X ~ ~ll fjx~C
9 MW ... ;z.q 15(/9/11 OQ4S I-W iL 'IQ'Q -
01' ~
to ~~-3b ir../Q/II 1\50 fo-\tV )< I:::::!
Custody T~:;d ~:iir;t.. stlll,;;r \ l:30 &91/5/.7. Received by (pilot): DateITIme: SlgnalUle:
~"r.lML .. Record Relfnqulshe<l by (prlnt~ ~ DateITIme: $,gnal.ure: ..,J Received by (prir( I: DaleJTome: Slgna!UIO:
MUST be
Signed I<~veo D,aooraW<)': i~j ~":j J 1~ M' s~nk~:_ ~ Sample Disposal: Return to Client: _ La~ Disposal: Kr.J :})~ ---
.. In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report .
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
iJ OJ co (l)
w CD
Q.
w CD
Id#~t#N
a!zZ-IIU·UU' PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
I Company Name: Project Name. PWS. Permit. Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
I t)~,,\~0(\ M~(\e~ ?{6. Q",u-te.r GfO\.)l\cl W~+«.r 2.0'1 State: VI..'T Yes ~ No 0
I Report Mail Address: 'PO ~C) 80 ,\ Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print}
R~CV\ P .... \~r 435 '7~ ~I -ro.J\,,(.r 8C.1I:44K ~\Dl.nl~l\~ \XT gL\5,l\
i Invoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
I ~M<.. ~4n\ (...
Special Report/Formats: ~ fi\[j~J&ill}l7@[]@ OO~@!!D@'@'i]'~ .. Contact ELI prior to
I Ff-&/ 0 CD RUSH sample submittal
~O<ll£ ~ for charges and Cool., lO(s}: ,
:g w;gOI CD 0 ~ R scheduling -See
'-/:,," I-·->O;;....(il W Instruction Page o OW 0 EDD/EDT(Eleclronic Data} J9 (/) CI) "' ~ c U! U> :c o~-U) C) ~ '0 ReceiptTemp o POTWIWVVTP Format: u S "'c: ~ c: Comments: o~ ~I~I~ :J U 2.'1 ~ a °c o State: D LEVEL IV ... ..... a:;S c:::"l:: t-III ~~I~~ V ~ c o Other: D NELAC ... On Ice: @N :J ::I.~~I ~~ '\t l-S z a. (1)0 W '0 Custody Seal E >1 J W Co On Bottle !: II) CfJ '0 CI) c: On Cooler ~ H Intact
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX Signatuni
(Name. Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Match Y N
1
fJ.w -37 ~/lILlI O~15 ~-w )<. ~
2 MW-7C Z/loLU l~O ;2.-'tJ . )<. ~-
3 ""'('~O ~ 1~t\ 'k '0'12 E/'t/(' ~ Ilnll
4 I I
5 ~
6 ~
7 ~
8 t (lO~~;2 f1 9 ~~
10 It:::!
Custody Relinquished by ID/~ Oalefrme: SignOlilljJJ;....i.. Recelved by (print)· Oa\elTlme: Signa tire: :;~J1H . g)Il/~1 1 1130 .:'\~Arl.P!C.. -.A Record Relinquished by {pril1\)'.J OatelT1me: Slgnallh1!: '-.J ReceIved by {Ptint~ Oaletrrme. Slgnature:
MUST be ~A.I\M.r Ho1\~JcA
Signed 'V }(;'veG Z YDOramry: ua(e< lme: ~:L-Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal; r.·',) :S .Y-f ~J~'IJ 'f~nS
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice 01 this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
VISit our web site at www.energvlab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule. forms, and links.
TabF
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
TabFl
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
July 2011
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
July Monthly Ground Water 2011
11D7136-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-11
Collection Date: 7/6/2011
Received Date: 7/8/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/8/2011 1803h
Units: Ilg/L
1215h
1000h
463 West 3600 South Dilution Factor: 1
Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Compound
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
T etrah ydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 l.00 < l.00
17060-07-0 77-144 115
460-00-4 80-123 108
1868-53-7 80-124 103
2037-26-5 80-l25 96.6
Report Date: 7112/20 II Page 4 of 15
All analyses applicable [0 the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA arc pcrfonllcd in accordance to NELAC' protocols Pel1inent sampJinlj: information is located on the attached CDC This report is provided for the exclusive usc oftnc addlcssCC Privileges of
subsequent L1SC of the name of this company 0, any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection WIth the Le-publication of this report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility except fOl the due perfomlance of inspection and/Ol analysis in good nlith Imd according to the 11l1cs ofrhe trade and ofseicncc.
EN:RGY
1\ ">j , .. ;. I ~.'11 1' •
www.enerllYlab.com
AM/yfII:M EIuIItIa SIRes 'flU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • Collage Station, TX 818-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11070274-001
Client Sample ID: MW-11
Analyses Result Units
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
151 ug/l
Qualifier RL
10
Report Date: 08/01/11
Collection Date: 07/06/11 12:15
DateReceived: 07/08/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 07/29/11 12:26/ sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 20
EN:RGY
,"\ r lJ 1/.·, --1' ~!' :...
lWIW.energylab.com
AMIytIaI E.rAfIHw .. ,JU
Helena, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 80D·735·4489 . Casper, WY 818-235-1515
Gillalta, WY 886·188·7175 . Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 . College Station,1X 618-610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11070274-002
Client Sample ID: MW-2S
Analyses
METALS· DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
6.74 ug/L
Qualifier RL
0.30
Report Date: 08/01/11
Collection Date: 07106/11 12:30
DateReceived: 07108/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E200.8 07/11/1110:42/sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 20
EN:RGY
;\t~()I~;\I { t"I~',
www.energylab.com
AM/ffkIII br:a/lnt:dtllU 1111
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · CaspBr, W'l888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 816-188-7175 . Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 881-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11070274-003
Client Sample 10: MW-26
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
RADIO NUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
64
0.9
3270
57.1
2.8
0.4
0.2
ND
NO
ND
300
NO
ND
2.4
NO
NO
ND
105
92.0
108
85.0
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pCi/L
pC ilL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/01 /11
Collection Date: 07/06/11 07:50
DateReceived: 07/08/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
D
1 A4500-CI B 07/11/1113:31/wc
0.1 E353.2 07/12/11 14:07/ dc
10 A2540 C 07/08/11 16:22/1mc
0.30 E200.8 07/11/11 10:471 sml
E900.1 07/18/11 13:13/ ep
E900.1 07/18/1113:13/ep
E900.1 07/18/11 13:13/ ep
20 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:47/ jlr
1.0 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:47/ jlr
1.0 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:47/ jlr
100 SWB260B 07/14/1115:12/jlr
1.0 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:47/ jlr
20 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:47/ jlr
1.0 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:47/ jlr
1.0 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:471 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:471 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:47/ jlr
80-120 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:471 jlr
70-130 SW8260B 07/14/11 15:471 jlr
BO-120 SWB260B 07/14/11 15:471 jlr
80-120 SWB260B 07/14/11 15:471 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 5 of 20
EN:RGY
; .... !--.()IV\IOI.:I· '.J
www.energylab.com
Atu/fIkM~SIIIu 1m Halena, MT 877 ·472-0711 • Billings, MT BOD· 735·4489 • Casper, WY 881·235-8515
Gillette, WY 888·886·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·612·1225 • College Station, TX 888-610·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Cll070274-004
Client Sample ID: MW-30
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
METALS· DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
127
17
32.4
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/l
ug/l
Report Date: 08/01/11
Collection Date: 07105/11 11 :30
DateRecelved: 07108/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B 07/11/11 13:36 I wc
0 E353.2 07/12/11 14:09 I dc
5.0 E200.B 07/13/11 12:39 I sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 20
EI\ERGY
1\1 )I./\I( ),t.·
lIWIW.energylab.com
AM/fIkMll""-" IISI
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11070274-005
Client Sample ID: MW-31
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
148
22
532
1280
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Report Date: 08/01/11
Collection Date: 07/05/11 14:00
DateReceived: 07/08/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B 07/11/1113:42/wc
D E353.2 07/12/1114:19/dc
D 10 A4500-S04 E 07/26/11 15:491 Ijl
10 A2540 C 07/08/11 16:221 Imc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 20
EN:RGY
/\'-;"JI(-,jGI<i' .,
www.energylab.com
AMIyfJaI~SIIu 1m Helena, MT 877·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 . Casper, WY 888·235·1515
Glllatte, 'NY .IB·I88·7175 • Rapid City, SO 888·172·1225 • College Station, 1X 881-610·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11070274-006
Client Sample 10: MW-65
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
145
21
536
1300
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Report Date: 08/01 /11
Collection Date: 07105/11 14:00
DateReceived: 07108/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B 07/11/1113:46/wc
D E353.2 07/1211114:22/dc
D 10 A4500-S04 E 07/26/11 16:04 1 Ijl
10 A2540 C 07/08/11 16:2211mc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 20
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: July Monthly Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: 1107136-002A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 7/6/2011
Received Date: 7/8/2011 1000h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/912011 0021h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 119
460-00-4 80-123 106
1868-53-7 80-124 103
2037-26-5 80-125 97.6
Report Date: 7/12/2011 Page 5 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA arc pcrfoLlllcd in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infollTlation is located on the attached Cac. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequenlllsc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale ofaoy product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any
purpose other than for the a.ddressee will be glllnted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except fOl the due pcrfomlBnce of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the nllcs of the tradc Bnd ofscicnce.
EN:RGY
1\ ~:::) I {,;. I ( ; 1-11 .....
.~ www.energylab.com
AM/ftft;M~ Shu 1m Helena, MT 877·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 . Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 866·186·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • College Station, 1X 888·690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11070274-007
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank 6092
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
103
85.0
102
87.0
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 08/01/11
Collection Date: 07/06/11
DateReceived: 07/08/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:37 I jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
SW8260B 07/14/11 14:371 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 20
EN:RGY
At-.1.,\1 (.J~I • l
www.energylab.com
AM/yIk:M EIAIIIuI SiIu 'flU
Helena, tIT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 816·&88·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&12·1225 • College Station, TX 888·610·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper. WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11070274-008
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
3.2
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 08/01/11
Collection Date: 07106/11
DateReceived: 07108/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E170.1 07/08/11 09:301 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 20
American West
A r. tI. I 1/ T, ( A I 1.6:1 '.l .q It. r 0 Fl i l <;
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: (80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
Denver, CO 80265
TEL: [phone]
RE: July Monthly Ground Water 2011
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1107136
American West Analytical Laboratories received 2 sample(s) on 7/8/2011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado and Idaho. Certification
document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this
report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "SUff" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitaion limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
QA Officer Thank You, F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross Kyle
Gross
Approved by:
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross. o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL, email=kyle@awal-
labs.com, c=US
Dale: 2011 07 12 10:58:07 .{l6'DO'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 7112/2011 Page 1 of15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfonncd in accordance to NELAC ploloeols Peltinenl sampling information is localed on thc attached COCo This report is provided fa .. the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequcnt use of the name or this company or any member of its staff, or rcproduction of this report in connection with thc advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the Ie-publication of this report fOI any
Pl1l'Pose other than for the addressee will be granted only on cOlllac!.., This company accepts no responsibility except fOl the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to thc mlcs of the trade and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client:
Project:
Lab SetID:
Date Received:
Denison Mines
July Monthly Ground Water 2011
1107136
7/8/2011 1000h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
1l07136-001A MW-ll 7/6/2011 1215h
1107136-002A Trip Blank 7/6/2011
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 7112/2011 Page 2 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc perfolmed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation ;s located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive lise of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name orthis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the rc-publicillion of this report for /lny
purpose ather than (or Ihe addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faiih and according 10 the rules of the trade and of science
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
July Monthly Ground Water 2011
1107136
7/8/2011
7/6/2011
Intact
None
SW-8468260C/5030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 7112/2011 Page 3 of15
All analyses applicable fa the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc pcrfOlmcd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infOlTllation is located on the attached CDC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Plivilcgcs of
subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection With the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the Ie-publication oFthis rtport for any
purpose other Ihan for the addressee win bc granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfomlance of inspection andlol .-nalysis in good faith and according to the mles of the trade and ofscicncc
ANt..lYT:CAl
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1107136
Project: July Monthly Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 0708118 Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 0708118 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 0708118 Surr: 4-8romofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 0708118 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 0708118 Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
Ilg/L SW8260C 15.4 20.00 0 77.2 43-146
%REC SW8260C 57.0 50.00 114 69-132
%REC SW8260C 49.5 50.00 99.0 85-118
%REC SW8260C 51.6 50.00 103 80-120
%REC SW8260C 48.3 50.00 96.5 81-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Qual Date Analyzed
7/8/2011 1707h
7/8/2011 1707h
7/8/2011 1707h
7/8/2011 1707h
7/8/2011 1707h
Report Date: 7112/20 1 1 Page 6 0 f 1 5
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COc. This report is provided for the exclusive use ofrhe addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
A""At·l ICAl lAI:.i':'RATORI[S
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1107136
Project: July Monthly Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 070811B Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 070811B SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 070811B SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 07081lB SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 070811B SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Units
~g!L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260C < 1.00
SW8260C 57.4 50.00
SW8260C 52.4 50.00
SW8260C 51.4 50.00
SW8260C 49.1 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MBLK
Amount %REC Limits
115 69-132
105 85-118
103 80-120
98.2 81-120
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Qual Date Analyzed
7/8/2011 I 744h
7/8/2011 I 744h
7/8/2011 1744h
7/8/2011 1744h
7/8/2011 1 744h
Report Date: 7112/2011 Page 7 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAe protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any
member aries staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection andior analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West .A t.'A "'T ( ... L,t.eO Jl,..TOf?H
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1107136
Project: July Monthly Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
IID7136-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1107136-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1107136-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1107136-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1107136-001AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
!!glL SW8260C 20.3 20.00 0 102 43-146
%REC SW8260C 60.6 50.00 121 77-144
%REC SW8260C 49.8 50.00 99.5 80-123
%REC SW8260C 53 .0 50.00 106 80-124
%REC SW8260C 47.7 50.00 95.3 80-125
%RPD
RPD
Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Qual Date Analyzed
7/9/2011 0040h
7/9/2011 0040h
7/9/2011 0040h
7/9/2011 0040h
7/9/2011 0040h
Report Date: 7112/2011 Page 8 ofl5
ALI analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infollI1ation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name arthis company or any
member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for 8Ily purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
A~ALvT,C"'l lABORATORiI:S
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1107136
Project: July Monthly Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
l107136-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
l107136-001AMSD SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1107136-001AMSD SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1107136-001AMSD SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1107136-001AMSD SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]. web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IJ.g/L SW8260C 20.3 20.00 0 102 43-146
%REC SW8260C 60.6 50.00 121 77-144
%REC SW8260C 49.4 50.00 98.8 80-123
%REC SW8260C 53 .7 50.00 107 80-124
%REC SW8260C 48.1 50.00 96.2 80-125
%RPD
0.0984
RPD
Limit
25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
7/9/2011 0059h
7/9/2011 0059h
7/9/2011 0059h
7/9/2011 0059h
7/9/2011 0059h
Report Date: 7112/2011 Page 9 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocoLs. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of chis company or any
member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connectio[] with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Qu antitation Report
C:\msdchem\I\DATA\JULII-C\08JUL11A\
K86L1361.D
a ~ul 2011 6 :03 pm
1107136-0011>.
SAMP 5 .0ML 20F3
6 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time : Ju1 11 10:43 :57 2011
Quant Method C :\MSDCH~M\1\METHODS\AFUL LW_35 .M
Quant Title VOA Cal~bration
QLast Update Thu ~ul 07 16 :15:38 2011
Response v i a Initial Calibration
lQT Reviewed}
Abundance 1050000 TIC' KB6L1361 .D\data.ms
1000000
950000
900000
850000
800000
750000
700000
650000
600000
550000
500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
"0000
50000
II
I ' 8 j
j
I ~
j
~ !
J • • ! ;,
~
j
Time->
O'~~~~~~~r-~~~~~~r-~~~~~~~~~~~~~T'"
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10,00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_35 .M Mon Ju1 11 11 :02 :28 2011
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
Q1ast Update
Response via
Abundance
950000
900000
850000
800000
750000
700000
650000
600000
550000
500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\OATA\JU111-C\08JU111A\
10611362.0
9 Jul 2011 12:21 am
1l07136-002A
SAMP 5.0M1 10F1
26 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 11 10:52:27 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFU11W_35.M
VOA Calibration
Thu Jul 07 16:15:38 2011
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: L06L 1362.D\data.ms
CIt "l. " Q) ~ lii ~ e E 11 e ." g 0 '5 N.
E e 5 .a OJ 0
5 (/)
I Time-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 910 9.50 10.00 10:50 11.00 11 .50
AFU1LW_35.M Mon Jul 11 11:12:28 2011 Report Date: 7112/2(j'!3lgEp'ege111 of 15
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Abundance
1400000
1300000
1100000
1000000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL11-C\08JUL11A\
K83LCS20.D
8 Jul 2011 5:07 pm
LCS VOC 070811B
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 08 17:20:53 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_35.M
VOA Calibration
Thu Jul 07 16:15:38 2011
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: K83LCS20.D\data.ms
'" ~ " c: ~ 0 >-5 (J)
g
~ .8 e g
II:
CI >-!!l
E
:§
0 :c u
AFULLW_35.M Mon Jul 11 10:57:46 2011
Data Path
Dat.a file
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mi se
ALS Vi.al
Ouantitation Report
C :\msdchem\1\DATA\JULI1-C\OSJUL11A\
KS5LMBLK.D
8 Ju1 2011 5 :44 pm
MB Vex:. 0708113
MBLK 5 .0ML
5 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant. Time: Jul 11 10:43 :23 2011
Quant Method C :\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AfULLW_35 .M
Quant Title VOl>. Calibration
QLast Update Thu Ju! 07 16 :15 :38 2011
Response via Init.ia1 Calibration
(QT Reviel<led)
Abundance TIC' K85LMBLK.Dldata ms
1000000
950000
900000
850000
800000
750000 J I
.i
700000
650000
600000
550000
500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
Time··>
Ol~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r-~~~~~~,",
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AfULLW_35 .M Mon Ju1 11 10:58:21 2011 Rcpon Dale: 7f1212l1ll19q~g<.413 of1 S
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JUL11-C\08JUL11A\
L07S1361.D
9 Jul 2011 12:40 am
1l07136-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 30F3
27 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jul 09 00:52:15 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_35.M
VOA Calibration
Thu Jul 07 16:15:38 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
Abundance
1
TIC: L07S1361.Dldata.ms
1250000
1200000
1150000
1100000
1050000
1000000
950000
900000
850000
800000
750000
650000
600000
550000
500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
200000 ~ .,
1
150000 co
] l :§l ~
1il ~ 19
100000 E ~""., 0 w 05 E ~ ] III
Time->
AFULLW_35.M Mon Jul 11 11:00:00 2011
" (/)
E
Report Date: 711 2/2{i' rllg Ep"age'll 4 ofl5
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Abundance
1150000
1100000
950000
900000
650000
750000
700000
650000
600000
550000
500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
rrime-->
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JULll-C\OBJUL11A\
LOBD1361.D
9 Jul 2011 12:59 am
1l07136-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3
27 Sample Multiplier; 1
Jul 09 01:11;05 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_35.M
VOA Calibration
Thu Jul 07 16:15:38 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: L06D1361.Dldata.ms
E Ii I
~ I en ~ "., ~ .SJl~
OJ ~jg
]-'!21ii
W ~5 ]
AFULLW_3S.M Mon Jul 11 11:00:33 2011
10.50 11 .00 11.50
Report Date: 711 2/2ij]'ljgEpftge'll 5 of 15
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1107136
Client: Denison Mines Page 1 of 1 7/81201 1
Client ID: DEN tOO Contact: fo Ann Tischler
Project: July Monthly Ground Water 20 I] QC Level: LEVEL TIL WOType: Project
Comments: No Hard Copies (UL). QC 3 & Summary. EDD-CSV. Report Tm~ to I ~lglL.;
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Doe Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1107136·001A MW-1J 7/612011 1215h 7/812011 1000h 712212011 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridgc 3
1107136·002A Trip Blank 71612011 8260-W ~ VOCFddge
OENISOJ)~
MINES
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
lIo)/>CI
Sheet 1 of 1
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project
July Monthly Ground
Water 2011
Sample 10
MW-11
Trip Blank
Date
Collected
7/6/2011
7/6/2011
Samplers Name Samplers Signature
Tanner Holliday
Time
Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
1215 THF
Please notify Ryan Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately! Thank
you.
./'"
Relinquished By:{Signature) DatelTime VBY:(Signature) DatelTime
~)~J-f/tt; 7/7/2011
110..0
Relinquished By:(Signature) V' Received By:(Signature) Da~ime
~ yj{ ~ t-/
/t:l 0])
/' \I /
Lab Set ID: I ( 0 7 I") ~
SamIJIes Were: COC Tape Was: Container T~e: No. Rec.
.Q(Shipped By: ~ vt~S Present on Outer Package ~ WAL Suoplied Plastic
o Hand Delivered ,6Yes DNo DN/A D A WiY... Supplied Clear Glass
D Ambient Unbroken on Outer package D A W AL SUwlied Amber Glass
;oChilled ,&"Yes DNo DN/A D A WAL SUP1)li~=crroX Vials
Temperature tt.lJ °C Present on Sample D Amber D Clear D Rea ace D No Headspace
Rec. Broken/Leaking .k!Yes DNa DN/A DYes DNo .f.(N/A D Non A WAL Supplied Cont~
Notes: !;,",A~ L.v1~ kL~1 \t f--t--i!$
Unbroken on Sarijple Notes: ~ / v,'c.../ DYes DNo AJN/A
Properly Preserved riVes DNa DN/A Notes: \
Notes: I
Rec. Within Hold li\'es DNo Discrepancies Between Labels and CDC DYes AT No
Notes: /\ Notes: r \
Bottle Ty~e Preservative All pHs OK
Ammonia pH <2 H2SO4
COD -.TT <? J..J.SO.
Cyanide PH>12 NaOH ---Metals pH <2 RNO, -............
N02 & N03 pH <2 H2SO4 r---:-.
Nutrients pH <2 H2SO4 ~ r--
O&G pH<2HCL ----Phenols pH <2 H2SO4 ~
Sulfide pH> 9NaOH, ZnAC -----TKN pH <2 H2SO4
---------TOe pH <2 H3P04 ~
TP04 pH <2 H2SO4 ~
TPH pH <2 HCL ~ ......... ........
~
...............
i'---. .. ) -.. . . , , .. • h _. '"
2) Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
3) Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
4) If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
5) Flag CDC and notify client for further instructions
6) Place client conversation on CDC
7) Samples may be adjusted at client request
EN:RGY
/\t.!O"J',1 CI~''---'J
www.energylab.com
AIu/ytiulfzcllliHK:,SkJClIIS2
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • BllllnKs, MT 800-731-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 18B-B88-7115 • Rapid City, so 888-672-1225 • Colluga station, TX 888-6ID-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
August 01, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11070274 Quote 10: C1640 -pac Wells
Project Name: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 8 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 7/8/2011 for analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11070274-001 MW-11 07106/11 12 :15 07108/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11070274-002 MW-25 07/06/11 12:30 07108/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11070274-003 MW-26 07106/11 7:50 07/08/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
SW8260B VQCs, Standard List
C11070274-004 MW-30 07/05/11 11 :30 07108/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C11070274-005 MW-31 07105/11 14:00 07108/11 Aqueous Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
C11070274-006 MW-65 07105/11 14:00 07108/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11070274-007 Trip Blank 6092 07106/11 0:00 07/08/11 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11070274-008 Temp Blank 07106/11 0 :00 07108/11 Aqueous Temperature
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601. Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated. Samples corrected for dry weight indicate units that have -dry appended.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
~~i) uJcJ.~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011 .08.01 08:31 :58 -06:00
Page 1 of 20
www.energytab.com
AMJyIIaI ERfIIIrIa SiJJA IISZ
Helena, MT 817-472-0711 -Billings, MT 800-735-4481 -Casper, WY 818-235-0515
Gillette WY8&&-18&-7175 -Ra Id Ci ,so 888-672-1225 -College Station, TX888-69D-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011 Report Date: 08/01/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11070274 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITIAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001 ; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analYSis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 20
EN:RGY
;-'1 •. JI'/'I ! JI,': '.
www.energyi8b.com
AMITIIc.I ExuItMIu SIRu lin
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • BIllings, MY 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 81&-&88-7175 • Rapid City, SD a88-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-610-2218
QAlQC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLKC
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS1_ Laboratory Control Sample
Sotids, Total Dissolved TDS @ lS0 C 989 mg/L
Sample 10: Cll070256-008AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2270 mg/L
Sample 10: Cll070274-006AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 1300 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 08/01 /11
Work Order: Cll070274
RL %REC Low Limit High limit
Run: BAL-l_ll070SC
4
Run: BAL-l_ll0708C
10 99 90 110
Run: BAL-l 11070SC -
10 103 90 110
Run: BAL-l_ll0708C
10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimlt Qual
0.0
Batch: R1479S1
07/0S/11 16:10
07/08/11 16:11
07/0S/11 16:16
07/08/11 16:22
10
Page 11 of 20
EN:RGY
I\i·l)~.('f ~ I~I! '.
www.energytab.com
AMIftIW b"'-tlu SIIIe, 1m Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billinl$, MT 800·735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235·0515
Gillatte, WY 816·686·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·672·1225 • College Station, 1X 888-680·2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500·CI B
Sample 10: MBlK9·7/11/2011
Chloride
Sample 10: C11070274-006AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C11070274-006AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: lCS35·7/11/2011
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
508 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
508 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3600 mg/L
Report Date: 08/01/11
Work Order: C11070274
Rl %REC low limit High limit RPO RPOlimit Qual
Batch: 7/11/2011-CL-TIR-W
Run: TITRATION_110711A 07/11/1113:23
0.5
Run: TITRATION_110711A 07/11/11 13:50
1.0 103 90 110
Run: TITRATION_11 0711 A 07/11/11 13:51
1.0 103 90 110 0.0 10
Run: TITRATION_11 0711 A 07/11/11 13:55
1.0 102 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 20
EN:RGY
,.\1 .()I.;,r L, H, ~
-.,.energylab.com
MMtIIaI~S/IJu lSI
Helene, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, 1fT 800-135-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8IS-S8B-7175 • Rapid City, SD 818-872-1225 • CDilege StatiDn, 'IX 888-B90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Anafyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-S04 E
Sample 10: MBLK-1_110726
Sulfate
Sample 10: LCS-1_110726
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11070274-005AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11070274-005AMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
5100 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
865 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
857 mg/L
Report Date: 08/01/11
Work Order: C11070274
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 11 0726_1_S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_110726A 07/26/11 15:36
O.B
Run: TURB-2_11 0726A 07/26/11 15:39
100 106 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110726A 07/26/11 15:57
17 104 90 110
Run: TU RB-2_11 0726A 07/26/11 15:59
17 102 90 110 1.0 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 20
EN:RGY ,,-
.... '~(-"::f.;~I \..);~J! ~
www.energylab.com
Ao~1 £xuJItnc. smu 1m
Helene, MT 817-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 81&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-172-1225 • College StatiDn, 1J( 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/01/11
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11070274
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R148055
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank Run: ICPMS2-C_110713A 07/13/1111 :37
Selenium 0.0004 mg/L 0.0003
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS2-C_110713A 07/13/1111 :40
Selenium 0.0538 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Sample 10: C11070275-008CMS4 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS2-C_110713A 07/13/11 13:05
Selenium 0.0509 mg/L 0.0010 100 70 130
Sample 10: C11070275-008CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0713A 07/13/11 13:08
Selenium 0.0546 mg/L 0.0010 108 70 130 7.1 20
Method: E200.8 Batch: R148735
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0729A 07/29/11 11 :04
Manganese ND mg/L 3E-05
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0729A 07/29/11 11 :28
Manganese 0.0527 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Sample 10: C11070760-o04BMS4 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0729A 07/29/11 13:08
Manganese 0.052 mg/L 0.010 104 70 130
Sample 10: C11070760-004BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run : ICPMS2-C_11 0729A 07/29/1113:11
Manganese 0.052 mg/L 0.010 103 70 130 0.3 20
Method: E200.8 Batch: R147896
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0711 A 07/11/1110:18
Uranium 1 E-05 mg/L 8E-06
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0711 A 07/11/11 10:22
Uranium 0.0534 mg/L 0.00030 107 85 115
Sample 10: C11070275-006AMS4 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS4-C_110711A 07/11/11 11 :27
Uranium 0.134 mg/L 0.00030 109 70 130
Sample 10: C11070275-006AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0711 A 07/11/11 11 :32
Uranium 0.130 mg/L 0.00030 100 70 130 3.4 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 14 of 20
EN:RGY
A~jOI,/\.rcl~.! ."
www.energylab.com
MMpIa/~SIIa 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-88&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • College Station, 1J( 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: LCS-2
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: LFB-3
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11070274-0030MS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11070274-0030MSO
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDe -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
2.55 mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
1.94 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.84 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.80 mglL
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO
Run: TECHNICON_110712A
0.06
Run: TECHNICON_110712A
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0712A
0.10 99 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0712A
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_110712A
0.10 99 90 110 1.4
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
08/01/11
C11070274
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R147990
07/12/11 11 :54
07/12/11 11 :56
07/12/11 12:11
07/12/11 14:12
07/12/1114:14
10
Page 15 of 20
EN:RGY
.",ll( f~" I C. 1:1 •
www.energy18b.com
IiM/fIIaI EJaIIMu S/nu /152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillaite, WY 111-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-172-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&80-221 8
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: MB-GA-04S4
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Count Result
3 Method Blank
-0.010
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.3
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.4
Units
pCi/L
pC ilL
pCi/L
Sample 10: LCS-GA-04S4
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Laboratory Control Sample
Sample 10: Cll070290-009BMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: Cll070290-009BMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
21.2 pC ilL
Sample Matrix Spike
45.4 pCilL
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
46.9 pCi/L
Report Date: 08/01/11
Work Order: Cll070274
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: G542M_ll 0713A
Run: G542M_ll 0713A
101 70 130
Run: G542M_ll 0713A
92 70 130
Run: G542M_ll0713A
95 70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLImit Qual
3.1
Batch: GA-0454
07/18/11 13:13
U
07/18/11 13:13
07/18/11 14:47
07/18/1114:47
22.8
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 16 of 20
EN:RGY
.~d . 'H,.,I ()) lit :,
www.energylab.com
AMIytJaI Exu/IMcI SInu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 81&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • Collega Station, TJ( 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/01/11
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11070274
---
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limil High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R148147
Sample 10: 14-Jul-11_LCS3 15 Laboratory Control Sample Run: GCMS2_11 0714B 07/14/11 10:34
Benzene 9.2 ug/L 1.0 92 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 11 ug/L 1.0 106 70 130
Chloroform 9.7 ug/L 1.0 97 70 130
Chloromethane 9.1 ug/L 1.0 91 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 18 ug/L 1.0 88 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 80 ug/L 20 80 70 130
Methylene chloride 9.5 ug/L 1.0 95 70 130
Naphthalene 10 ug/L 1.0 99 70 130
o-Xylene 8.9 ug/L 1.0 89 70 130
Toluene 9.4 ug/L 1.0 94 70 130
Xylenes, Total 27 ug/L 1.0 89 70 130
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 100 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 90 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 101 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 88 80 120
Sample 10: 14-Jul-11_MBLK_6 15 Method Blank Run: GCMS2_11 0714B 07/14/11 11:43
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 103 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 80 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 98 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 86 80 120
Sample 10: C11070274-003EMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run : GCMS2_110714B 07/14/11 16:22
Benzene 1800 ug/L 100 90 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 1900 ug/L 100 97 70 130
Chloroform 2200 ug/L 100 96 70 130
Chloromethane 1600 ug/L 100 80 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 3500 ug/L 100 87 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 20000 ug/L 2000 99 70 130
Methylene chloride 1900 ug/L 100 94 70 130
Naphthalene 1600 ug/L 100 82 70 130
o-Xylene 1700 ug/L 100 87 70 130
Toluene 1800 ug/L 100 92 70 130
Xylenes, Total 5200 ug/L 100 87 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detecled at the reporting limit.
MOC - Minimum detectable concentration
Page 17 of 20
EN:RGY
:\1.'_)11 .. "-1 :..J:" ! ".
-.v.energyiab.com
~~SIlIuI82
Halena, MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 81&-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-112-1225 • College SllItion, TX 818-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 08/01/11
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11070274
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R148147
Sample 10: C11070274-003EMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCMS2_110714B 07/14/11 16:22
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 99 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 88 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 96 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 89 80 120
Sample 10: C11070274-003EMSO 15 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: GCMS2_110714B 07/14/11 16:57
Benzene 1800 ug/L 100 89 70 130 1.3 20
Carbon tetrachloride 1900 ug/L 100 93 70 130 4.6 20
Chloroform 2000 ug/L 100 87 70 130 8.3 20
Chloromethane 1600 uglL 100 79 70 130 2.0 20
m+p-Xylenes 3500 uglL 100 88 70 130 0.7 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 17000 ug/L 2000 85 70 130 15 20
Methylene chloride 1700 uglL 100 85 70 130 9.9 20
Naphlhalene 1900 ug/L 100 95 70 130 15 20
o-Xylene 1800 ug/L 100 88 70 130 1.8 20
Toluene 1800 ug/L 100 91 70 130 0.4 20
Xylenes, Total 5300 ug/L 100 88 70 130 1.1 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 98 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 84 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 94 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 88 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 18 of 20
EN:RGY
" L I JI. /~ I ~ , I' , •
www.energytab.com
~~S1r/U lat
Helene, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-8515
Gillette, WY 86&-688·7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College SllItion, TX 888-&90-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
III~III ill ~II ~III~~ I~~ I~IIIIIIII~IIIIIIIII
C11070274
Login completed by: Debra Williams
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 7/12/2011
Shipping container/cooier in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
3.2'C On Ice
Yes 0
Yes 0
Date Received: 7/8/2011
Received by: dw
Carrier NDA
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No 0
No D
Not Present D
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
No VOA vials submitted D
Not Applicable 0
MW-26 nitric preserved sample received with a pH of 7. Added 2 mLs HN03 for a final pH of <2.
Page 19 of 20
"U Dl to CD
N a
~
N a
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record 'U#(''''7 ,e'P1£W-UUI' PLEASE PRINT JProvide as much information a_s_l>ossible.)
Page _\_of_'_
Company Name:
De.oi~O(\ M;(\~ Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. I Sample Origin
\Jv..'--", M of\+h I~ ("("ou,nJ lAJO\.1-er ;lei II State: \Xl
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes 0" No 0
Report Mail Address: PO CO)( g Oq
e,1Q..na :n~ u...,-g4.Sl\
Contact Name: Phone/Fax:
Invoice Addr~
R~",t'I Po-.'l11~r Q3,S b78 xu.J
-----+1 -:-In"""voice Contact & Phone:
Sampler: (Please Print)
-r.::-n n c: (" H" IJ,'J A a Email:
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
~Nn!. .5tN"'<'
Special Report/Formats:
Dow D EOO/EDT(Electronic Data)
~ o ~ ~otJ)~ ~tO;gol Q;
]i> ~ iU'm
C(/)Ci'l en ~ 0:>= ~ 0> u:>°oc: ..... 4: (/)1·-:S2 o '-tOl c: ... Q.j$C"C
~I1W@[]@ W~@l1D~@ ..
[ R
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
Shi.!!!rd~by: -UnJ~.d~~ co~rJe(Sf~
t~OII-t.,(
o POTWIWWTP Format: ____ _ o State: ___ _ o Other: ___ _
D LEVEL IV
D NELAC
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection
Date
-
: :re·,? 51W\K W12
-10
~~I~~ "E ... -> :::l w:;I(I):> za. ..... g>o ~ >1
(/)
ColI~tion I MATRIX Time
-w
b-W
-vJ -w
~-vJ
I ~I I I I I I I I IJi
'f..
)( 1")( 1 ~ 1 X I ~ 1)( I X
~I I I 1')(1 I~
Ix I I I JXJ)( I 1')<
~I 1 1 1)(1)(1 1)(
ReceMld bYl'Pi1m).
Received by (p!in1).
Custody Record ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
u c e co c: .... ::::l ~
'E co u c co en
u Comments:
5
H
OatelT1me:
Datefrtme:
Re":!J'.tT&lnp ~·~,c
Dnlce: ~N
cu~~O:I~al ~ i"
011 Cooler Y ~
Intact N
Signature N
Match
~
~ ~
I ~-~ ~~ ~ D. !!=.t 'O/Ol.7~
SIgnature:
Signature;
MUSTbe!r-------------------------------~~~~~--~~~--~~~~~----~
Sig nee:! Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab DIsposal: _-===--_
In certain circumstance$. samples submitted to Energy Laboratorie$, Inc. may be subcontracted toYer certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility~ All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.enerovlab.com for additional information~ downloadable fee schedule~ forms. and links~
EN:RGY
._J\~(Jnj\ I GI~IL ~
www.energylab.com
AIu/ylfa/ m.ur-ShIc. llU
Halana, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT eoG-735-4489 . Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillotte, WY 8&&-&88-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&12-1225 • Collega Sialion, 1X 888-&90-2218
August 10, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
WorkorderNo.: C11070824
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
Quote 10: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 1 sample for Denison Mines USA Corp on 7/22/2011 for analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11070824-001 MW-35 07/20/11 10:35 07/22/11 Aqueous Metals by ICPIICPMS, Dissolved
Th is report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 . Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QAIQC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated. Samples corrected for dry weight indicate units that have -dry appended.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
c3¥~ £) uJcJ.~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011 .08.10 14:43:24 -06:00
Page 1 of 6
www.energylab.com
AMIybI~"'m
Helena, MT877-472-D711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 86&-186-7175 • Ra Id City, so 88a-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-69D-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011 Report Date: 08/10/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11070824 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITIAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 6
EN:RGY
ll\HOlll\f C lllt ~;
www.energylab.com
~/~."'IU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gil/ette, WY 8&&-88&-7175 . Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 . College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
July Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11070824-001
Client Sample ID: MW-35
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
348
24.2
Units
ug!L
ug!L
Qualifier RL
10
0.30
Report Date: 08/10/11
Collection Date: 07/20/11 10:35
DateRecelved: 07/22/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCl!
QCl Method Analysis Date! By
E200.8 08/06/11 00:11 / sml
E200.8 08/06/11 00:11 I sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 6
EI\ERGY
. l ... UOHl-IO'.,I! .....
www.energylab.com
AnJytiQI Exulllncl SiJIu IIH
Helena, MT 877-472-D7ll • Billings, MT 8DO-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GlIIBttB, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Slat ion, TX 888-&80-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: July Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: E200.8
Result Units
Sample 10: C11070839-007BMS4
Manganese
2 Sample Matrix Spike
1.66 mg/L
Uranium 0.545 mg/L
Sample 10: C11070839-007BMSD 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Manganese 1.66 mg/L
Uranium 0.564 mg/L
Sample 10: LRB 2 Method Blank
Manganese ND mg/L
Uranium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Manganese 0.0503 mg/L
Uranium 0.0507 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 08/10/11
Work Order: C11070824
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.010
0.00030
0.010
0.00030
2E-05
8E-06
0.0010
0.00030
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll OB05A
137 70 130
108 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0805A
138 70 130
112 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll OB05A
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll OB05A
101 85 115
101 85 115
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPD RPDLimit Qual
Batch: R14B997A
OB/06/11 01 :19
S
08/06/11 01 :24
0.2 20 S
3.4 20
08/05/11 12:26
OB/05/11 12:31
Page 4 of 6
EN:RGY
LI\HUHI' .. I OHll !.~
WWN.energylab.com
AIIMytIaI ~ SInu llISt
Halena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 . Rapid City, so 888-&12-1225 . College Station,1X 888-690-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
11II1II1 ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
C11070824
Login completed by: Edith McPike
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 7/25/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
2.6"C On Ice
Yes 0
Yes 0
Date Received: 7/22/2011
Received by: dw
Carrier NDA
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
No VOA vials submitted 0"
Not Applicable 0
Page 5 of 6
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page_\_of_\ _ tUIft{U
'Btl-Xiii-I,. PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Company Name:
M;ne.~ Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPNState Compliance:
De.1'\t~on U".,..\..'\ MO(l+hl_~ &fQW\J. Wo...+~r ;tOll State: U"1' Yes ~ No 0
Report Mail Address: PO 13 0)( 8 O~ Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
'f>lc.nd: n...~ ~ 8~!t1t R~o..('\ P ().\rnc::r 435 b78 ~I -r;."nel" J-JoJj,IJ"j
Invoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
So..h'\c:'-~o......,e.
Special Report/Formats: :s: ~[1~®O@ ~~®M~[Q) .. Contact ELI prior to ShUP~_10 Of
0 ~ RUSH sample submittal
~o U)..c. for charges and Cooler lO(s):
~1XI;gOI :u 0 ,:::-R scheduling -See C()·~ .-> 0 >om ~ Dow D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) ~CJ)~ rn :s: w Instruction Page 0:s:= ~ 0) I "C ReeeiPXP o POTWIWWTP Format: 0 c: Comments: ~<ca.l~Q~ :I U ;{ DC o State: 0 LEVEL IV o ~ IXII c: ~ <! e \-8.~ 5;§ ~ I-III o Other: 0 NELAC ~0:r-g . ~ l-E On lee: C)N <! :l :l~:.l(I~:S: C .-S Z a. (1)0 .:: ~ w "E Custody Saal E >1 ~ ~ w co On Bortle ~ &g (f) "C On Cooler c: ~ III '-U5 H Intad
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX :S ~ Signature
(Name. Location. Interval, etc.) Date Time Match
1
7/f).lJ/ll I-W '"
...... MW-35 'O1>~ '" ~
2 ~
3 \QI
nnn
4 r@
5 ~
6 ~
7 ~ -~
8 ~ 0
9 IilQ ~
10 <==j·l/lollfXa
Custody ~::;;. bYH;ltl~<k~ ~ Io;.~~u I 130 _In:,;:urojJ~.JA.:L,,.. Received by print): Da.elTime! SognatlJre.
Record ReIlnqulshea by (prtnl~ tJ OalelTlme: Slgnalure, ....; Received by (prin\): DalelTime; SionaM&;
MUST be
Signed """I ~:rrJt.ry. A 2-~ll q J ~ ::itllnalu,e:
Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: [ -l!9)oth~ertified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested. In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories. Inc. may be subcontract~
pOsslOllity. All sub-contract data Will be Clearly notated on your analytical rep
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information. downloadable fee schedule. forms, and links.
TabF2
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
September 2011
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awa1-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
September Monthly Ground Water 2011
l109163-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-ll
Collection Date: 91712011 1515h
1009h Received Date: 9/9/2011
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
Analyzed: 9/9/2011 1508h
Units: I1g/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
CAS
Number
109-99-9
17060-07-0
460-00-4
1868-53-7
2037-26-5
Reporting Analytical
Limit Result Qual
1.00 < 1.00
77-144 109
80-123 108
80-124 106
80-125 99.4
Report Date: 9115/20 II Page 4 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and ReRA arc pcrfomlcd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent ~ampling informaLion is located on the auachcd COCo lJlis report is provided for the exclusive use of the addr~see. Privileges of
subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale afaoy product or process, or in connection with the fe-publication of this report for any
purpose othor than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. 1111S company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
I\-H .. )\~)\J ')I.JIC ~.
www.energytab.com
AM/fIlt2I EmI/Itra Shu 1151
Helena, MT 871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135·44811 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 81&-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11090325-001
Client Sample 10: MW-11
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
106 ug/L
Qualifier RL
10
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11 15:15
DateRecelved: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 09/09/11 19:43/ sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 21
EN:RGY
/\H\.Jf~··~I·-'I"I J .,
www.energylab.com
Aa/fIII:M f.aIIIIIa SInu IHI
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·135·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatte, WY 81&-188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·172-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11090325·002
Client Sample 10: MW-25
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
5.96 ug/l
Qualifier RL
0.30
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11 11:10
DateReceived: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E200.B 09/09/1119:47/sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 21
EN:RGY
/\-:.()I,.l/\IU.HI"
www.energylab.com
AMfTtkII~ShIu 1m
Helena, MT 871-472-0111 • Billings, MT BOO·735·4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillatte, WY 888·888·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • College Station, 1)( 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
LablD: C 11090325-003
Client Sample ID: MW-26
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TOS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Uranium
RADIONUCLlDES· DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
66 mg/L
2.4 mg/L
3200 mg/L
56.1 ug/L
2.5 pCi/L
0.4 pCl/L
0.2 pCi/L
NO ug/l
NO ug/L
NO ug/l
1300 ug/l
NO ug/L
NO ug/l
7.9 ug/L
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
NO ug/l
101 %REC
112 %REC
94.0 %REC
B9.0 %REC
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11 09:15
DateReceived: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
0
0
A4500-CI B 09/27/11 13:551 wc
0.2 E353.2 09/09/11 16:20 I dc
10 A2540 C 09/12/11 11 :01 Ilmc
0.30 E200.8 09/09/11 19:52 I sml
E900.1 09/15/11 17:561 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:561 ep
E900.1 09/15/11 17:56 1 ep
20 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
100 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:20 1 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:56 I jlr
20 SW8260B 09/15/11 19 :56 1 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
1.0 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
80-120 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:56 I jlr
70-130 SW8260B 09/15/11 19:56 I jlr
BO-120 SWB260B 09/15/11 19 :56 1 jlr
BO-120 SWB260B 09/15/11 19:561 jlr
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Page 5 of 21
EN:RGY
:,:-')f /,,1 -:"})-JI .~
\WIW.energylab.com
Au/1III:M £aIIwa sac. fllZ
Halena, MT 171-472-0711 • Billings, MT 100-735-4489 • Casper, WY 818-235-8515
Gillette, WY 88&-IIB-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, lX 188-610-2211
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11090325-004
Client Sample 10: MW-30
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
145
16
32.4
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
mg/l
ug/l
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11 10:45
DateReceived: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-CIB 09/27/11 13:581 wc
0 E353.2 09/09/11 16 :23 1 dc
5.0 E200.8 09/13/11 18:451 sml
Mel -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 21
www.energytab.com
AM11tIaI EJaIIIIa SIlxI 1m Halen., MY 877-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-8515
Gilletts, WY 81&-186-1115 • Rapid City, so 888-612-1225 • Collage Station, IX 881-610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
C 11 090325-005
Client Sample 10: MW-31
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
148
21
541
1300
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/06/11 14:10
DateReceived: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B 09/27/11 14:00/ wc
D E353.2 09/09/11 16:25 I dc
D 10 A4500-S04 E 09/16/11 15:23/ wc
10 A2540 C 09/12111 11 :01 Ilmc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 21
EN:RGY
1\~t.'I JI'·1 _)I JI 'J
www.energy1ab.com
AIu/ffIa/ ~ SIIIu 1151
Helena, NT 877-412-0711 • Billings, NT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 811-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-172-1225 • Colloge Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11090325-006
Client Sample 10: MW-35
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
270 ug/l
22.3 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
10
0.30
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11 12:40
DateReceived: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCl!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 09/09/11 20:361 sml
E200.8 09/09/11 20:361 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 21
EN:RGY
'~-j.ul-.lJ\1 ~ 1-.lIL • J
www.energytab.com
AM/ffIaI ~ SIIJU 'lIZ
Helena, 1M B77-472-0711 • Billings, 1M 800-735-4489 • Caspar, WY 881-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 8&&-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • Collage Station, TX 888-610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11090325-007
Client Sample ID: MW-65
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
275 ug/l
23.0 ug/l
Qualifier Rl
10
0.30
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11 12:40
DateReceived: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 09/09/11 20:41 / sml
E200.8 09/09/11 20:41 / sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 21
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: September Monthly Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: l109l63-002A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
ANA LYTI CAL LABORATORIES Collection Date: 9/7/2011
Received Date: 9/9/2011 1009h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
Analytical Results VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Analyzed: 9/9/2011 1527h
Units: fJ.g/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: T 0luene-d8
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 20.3
17060-07-0 77-144 111
460-00-4 80-123 112
1868-53-7 80-124 107
2037-26-5 80-125 99.2
Report Date: 9/15/2011 Page 5 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, ;;DWA. and RCRA are perfomled in accordance (0 NE~AC protocols. Pertinent samrling infomlatlon is locat~d on the attached COCo This report is provided for the ~xclusive use oflhe addressee Privileges of
subsequent use of the name oftrus company or any member of its staff. or reproduction oflhis report in connecLion with the advertisement, promotion or sale afany product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granled only on con1D.ct~ This company accepts no I1!Sponsibility except for thl! due pcrfommncc of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and Dccording to the rules of the trade and of science.
EI\ERGY
r".,UIJ'\1 ()'~I 'J
www.energylab.com
AIIfI1IIaI EluIIIIIa stnu 1m
Helena, MY 811-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 881-235·0515
Gillatte, WY 811·188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 88B-172-1225 • Collage Sialion, 1X 881-110-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
C11090325-008
Client Sample 10: Trip Blank 6092
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
103 %REC
97.0 %REC
94.0 %REC
86.0 %REC
Qualifier RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 10104/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11
DateRecelved: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
SW8260B 09/15/11 16: 18 1 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16: 18 1 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16: 18 1 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/11 16:181 jlr
SW8260B 09/15/1116:18/jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 21
EN:RGY
I\'--"':d ) \.1 0:. ... f-U , J
www.energylab.com
Aa/fIfaI f.aIIMa S1nw IIIZ
Helen., MT 871-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-8515
Gillette, W'( 818-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Cll090325-009
Client Sample 10: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.2
Qualifier Rl
Report Date: 10/04/11
Collection Date: 09/07/11
DateReceived: 09/09/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date / By
E170.1 09/09/11 09:20 / kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Pa~e 11 of 21
Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
American West Denver, CO 80265 ANA I ~l IC "'1 I AIlOAATo nl£S
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
TEL: [phone]
RE: September Monthly Ground Water 2011
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ill: 1109163
American West Analytical Laboratories received 2 sample(s) on 9/9/2011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado, Idaho, and Missouri.
Certification document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns
regarding this report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "SUIT" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, andlor
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitation limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You, Digitally signed by Jose G.
J 0 S e G ~~~~~=Jose G. Rocha.
• o::American WesL Analytical
Laboratories. ou=Quality
Assurance Officer, Roc h a ~::,~~=joSe@awal.'abs.com.
Date: 2011.09.1915:29:38 Approved by: 1--_______ ,0_6'_00_' ____ ---'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 9115/2011 Page I of15
All analyses applicable to the C;WA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance ~o NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided f9T the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use of the nllme oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or ineonnection with the re-publication oflhis report for any
purpose olher than for the addressee will be granted only on contacl. This company accepfs no responsibility ex-cept for Ihe due pcrConnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good failh and according to the roIL'S oflhe trade and of sciCTlce
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Denison Mines
September Monthly Ground Water 20 II
1109163
9/9/2011 1009h
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
1109163-001A MW-II 91712011 1515h
1109163-002A Trip Blank 91712011
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 9/15/2011 Page 2 of 15
All aflalyses applicable (0 the CW A. SDWA. and RCRA arc pcrfomlcd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pcrtin~t sampling infomlation is located on the attached COe.. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the ad4rcsscc Privileges of
.. subsequent USc of the name orlhis company or any member orits staft: orreproducLion of this report in connection with· the advertisement. proolotion or sale of any product or process, ·"rio conneclion with the fe-publication of this-report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfomlancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trnde and of science.
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone]
Toll Free: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
web: www.awal-Iabs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
Project:
Lab SetID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
September Monthly Ground Water 2011
1109163
9/9/2011
9/712011
Intact
None
SW-8468260CIS030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was observed in the Trip Blank above reporting
limits. To confirm the result of the first vial, a second sample vial was analyzed with a
similar result. The result in sample MW-11 was < 1.00 /lg/L and therefore demonstrates
that the contamination in the Trip Blank did not occur during the analysis. It is important to
note that the vials used for the Trip Blanks were not provided by American West Analytical
Laboratories.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 9/15/20 II Page 3 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance 10 t;-lfi:I.AC prolocQI~ P('uTnClr Nmrlhlg 10fonl1 Iron is lo~ated on the. IIUM'IK"ti COc. Thi! t:'l"pOft IS provided for t~e exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of
subsequent use ofthc name of Ihis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction orth-III tcpOn ln r::OfIn~lIon wilh Ihe ~uJYC'r1hllt1lellt. promotion or sI1e of any .,rod~hH or PI~ Qf In conTlection with the re-publication of this report for any
purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. 111is company acl'C'pts nO fcspoJHibi'Uty C:<tt'PI rOt lIu~ due I"""fromwn~ of inspection IIndfor IInal>,,15 In good fllhh And according 10 the ruh:s of the trade and of science
American West ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1109163
. Project: September Monthly Ground Water 2011
SampleID Analyte
LCS VOC 090911A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 090911A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 090911A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 090911A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 090911 A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
Units
11g/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
C SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260C 15.6 20.00
SW8260C 51.1 50.00
SW8260C 49.2 50.00
SW8260C 52.0 50.00
SW8260C 49.5 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
LCS
Amount %REC Limits
0 78.0 43-146
102 69-132
98.5 85-118
104 80-120
99.0 81-120
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Qual Date Analyzed
9/9/2011 0716h
9/9/2011 0716h
9/9/2011 0716h
9/9/2011 0716h
9/9/2011 0716h
Report Date: 9/15/2011 Page 6 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exc1usive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the Dame of this company or any
member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion OT we of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted oruy on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of [he trade and of science.
American West
ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
CUent: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1109163
Project: September Monthly Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 090911A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 090911A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 090911A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 090911A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 090911A SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
Ilg/L SW8260C < 1.00
%REC SW8260C 53.5 50.00 107 69-132
%REC SW8260C 53.4 50.00 107 85-118
%REC SW8260C 52.7 50.00 105 80-120
%REC SW8260C 51.5 50.00 103 81-120
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
9/9/2011 0754h
9/9/2011 0754h
9/9/2011 0754h
9/9/2011 0754h
9/9/2011 0754h
Report Date: 9/1512011 Page 7 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the Dame of this company or any
member afits staff. or reproduction aftbis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale orany product or process, or in connection with tbe re-publication of this report for any purpose other tban fortbe addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts DO responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the ruJes of the trade and of science.
American West
4NA l yt.e:Al LAftO~"TORIIS'
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1109163
. Project: September Monthly Ground Water 2011
SampleID Analyte
1109163-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1109163-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1109163-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1109163-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
1109163-001AMS SUIT: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~g;L SW8260C 19.8 20.00 0 99.0 43-146
%REC SW8260C 55.9 50.00 112 77-144
%REC SW8260C 49.0 50.00 98.0 80-123
%REC SW8260C 53.8 50.00 108 80-124
%REC SW8260C 48.2 50.00 96.4 80-125
RPD
%RPD Limit
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Qual Date Analyzed
9/9/2011 1546h
9/9/2011 1546h
9/9/2011 1546h
9/9/2011 1546h
9/9/2011 1546h
Report Date: 9115/2011 Page 8 of 15
All anaLyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the Dame ofthis company or any
member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
American West
ANALYTICAL LABO~ATORIES
Client: Demson Mines
Lab Set ID: 1109163
Project: September Monthly Ground Water 2011
SampleID Analyte
1109163-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
. 1109163-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1109163-001AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1109163-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1109163-001AMSD Surr: Toluene-d8
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Phone: [phone], Toll Free: [phone], Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
/lgIL SW8260C 19.9 20.00 0 99.7 43-146
%REC SW8260C 56.0 50.00 112 77-144
%REC SW8260C 48.1 50.00 96.2 80-123
%REC SW8260C 53.5 50.00 107 80-124
%REC SW8260C 47.5 50.00 95.1 80-125
RPD
%RPD Limit
0.705 25
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
Qual Date Analyzed
919/2011 1605h
919/2011 1605h
9/9/2011 1605h
9/9/2011 1605h
9/9/2011 1605h
Report Date: 9/15/2011 Page 9 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exc1usive lISe of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any
member of its staff. or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or proc~ or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee win be granted. only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility
except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science,
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitati on Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\SEPII-C\09SEPllA\
Y55L1631 .D
9 Sep 2011 3 :08 pm
1l09163-00lA
SAMP 5 .0ML lOF3
28 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time : Sep 10 15 :25 :35 2011
Quant Met hod C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_37.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update li'ri Sep 02 07 :25 :06 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
<Qr Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: Y55L 1631.0\data.ms
1100000'
1050000
1000000
950000,
900000·
850000;
~ I c
~ I ..
~ J
I
i g ~ e '" ~ li ~ '" ~
i
800000'
750000
700000 I
650000 ~
6000001
I
550000i
500000j
4500001 rn. .. I ~ '" I f 4°0000i ~
r ~ ! I i 3600001 ~ ~ i
1 ~ ,t:
300000j til
I
I
2500001 I
200000
150000
100000
50000
o
Time--> ?,Qg 2.(i0 .M ,Q 3.59 4,09 4.50 2-Q.O 5.50 6.00 6.§0 _ 7.g0 7.5Q ~.OO 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11 .00 11.50
AFULLW_37 .M Sat Sep 10 15:27 :25 2011 Page: 4
Rcpon Dale: 9/151201 1 Page 10 liftS
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\SEPI1-C\09SEPlIA\
Y55L1632.D
9 Sep 2011 3:21 pm
1l09l63-002A
SAMP 5.0ML lOF2
29 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Sep 10 15:29:12 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\I\METHOOS\AFULLW_31.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Sep 02 01 :25:06 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TlC: Y55L 1632.0ida!a,ms
"00000
'050000
'000000
950000
900000
850000
800000
750000
700000
850000
800000
550000
500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
'50000
'00000
50000
o
I I t ,
l
I
Ii
j
f
Time .. > 2,00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.()Q 11 .50
AFULLW_37.M Sat Sep 10 15:29:27 2011 Page: 4
Repon Date: 9/1512011 Pale II orIS
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\SEP11-C\09SEP11A\
Y30LCS20.D
9 Sep 2011 7:16 am
LCS VOC 09091lA
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR 10 AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Sep 10 15:11:16 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_37.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Sep 02 07:25:06 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abunda(lce TIC: Y30LCS20.D\data.ms
2100000
2000000
1900000
1 BOOOOO
1700000
1600000
1500000
1400000-
1300000·
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
BOOOOO
700000
6000001
500000
400000 !
~ ~a;
3000000:,
200000! ~
0.>
100000
I
I
I
I
I Q Iii T
I '! I,
01 -7F ---- _ ..,;... ~ - ---
Time--> ~.OO 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 B.OO B.50 9.00 9.50 HtOO 1 Q,50 ~ 11.9L
AFULLW_37.M Sat Sep 10 15:13:00 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 9115/2011 Page 12 ofl5
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\S~PI1-C\09SEPI1A\
Y32LMBLK.D
9 Sep 2011 7:54 am
MB VOC 090911A
MBLK S .OML
5 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Sep 10 15:12:10 2011
Quant Method C:\MSOCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_37.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Sep 02 07:25:06 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: Y32LMBLKD\dala.ms
1150000
1OSOOOO
'000000
950000
900000
850000 I
750000
700000
650000
600000
550000
500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
II .I .Ii
250000
200000
.50000
'00000
50000
o
Time··> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.SO 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_37.M Sat Sep 10 15:13:32 2011 Page: 4
Repon Datc: 911S12011 Page 13 of IS
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\I\DATA\SEPII-C\09SEPIIA\
Y56S163l.D
9 Sep 2011 3:46 pm
1l09163-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 10F3
30 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Sep 09 15:58:12 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_37.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Sep 02 07:25:06 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
Abundance
1700000
TIC: Y56S1631.D\data.ms
1600000·
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000 (J)
1
500000 ~ (J) ~ 1
400000
300000
200000
100000·
;g
Cl
~ :!! "-
'I
. I t;
() .. 1 1 II r
!
,,; c: , ~1
1 lID
~~ -5 .-J ~
CD
~~J;, s:; _0 ., c: ~~i .11. III _ a:fij U.e: 1 £; '"i.e: 20Tij '0 m , ~ ~ t 8~ <:::iii!! 1 . 0 E UJ 0 J, I !! ~ , I <II ,
·1
o
AFULLW_37.M Sat Sep 10 15:26:13 2011
.. ai 1 !!! ~ ~ (J)
.,
I,
I
I ,
Ui 1
I
.. Iii ~
Cl.
"" E
~ 1: c: I ,g
~ Cl -I:.
~
(J) ,,; c ~ CD ~ 0 ~ !! <II ~ j ..I:
.3 !-
Page: 4
Report Date: 9115/2011 Page 14 of15
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\SEP11-C\09SEP11A\
Y57D1631.D
9 Sep 2011 4:05 pm
1l09163-001AMSD
MSD 5. OML 10F3
31 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Sep 09 16:16:58 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_37.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Sep 02 07:25:06 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: Y57D1631 .D\data.ms
, 1600000
1500000
1400000
13000001
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000-
700000'
600000
'" t ! '" 500000 ,; I fa t e .2
400000 :!i 0
'" '" <\t
" 5
i' '" ! " 300000 0. a: 5i~ ~ ~ ~ t! .. ,H 0
I 1 ~ ~ I~~ . 0 ...
200000 ~ !iii" ; Hf .. ~ I~ Ai No ! to! ~, ,
100000, ~ w ~ I
" e . ,
III < . 'I' \ • I
, i'
Time--> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 1.Q.OO 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_37.M Sat Sep 10 15:26:46 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 9115/2011 Page IS of 15
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client:
ClientID:
Project:
Comments:
SampleID
I J 09163-001 A
11 09 1 63-002A
Denison Mines
DENIOO
September Monthly Ground Water 2011
QC 3 & Summary. EDD-CSV. Report TIIF to I ).1g/L.;
Client Sample ID Collected Dllte
MW-Il 9n 12011 1515h
Trip Blank 9n 12011
Contact:
QCLevel:
Received Date
9/9120 II 1009h
UL
Worl< Order: 1109163
Page I of 1 9f912011
Jo Ann Tischler
LEVELIIT WOType: project~
Date Due Matrix Test Code SeJo Storage
9123/2011 Aqueous 8260-W 0 VOCFridgc 3
8260-W ~ VOCFridge
OENISOJ)~
MINES
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Sheet 1 of 1
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Pro'ect
September Monthly
Ground Water 2011
Sample 10
MW-11
-rri I> BIQ.t\V.
Date
Collected
9/7/2011
q/7 1;1.i)"
Samplers Name Sam lers Signature
Tanner Hollida
Time
Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
1515 THF
Please notify Ryan Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately!
Thank you.
r _
Relinquished By:(Signature) DatelTime Vd By:(Signature) DatelTime
~~fl4h 9/8/2011
1139
Relinquished By:(Signature) D7e Received By:(Signature) ~elTime
Idll1AA_ jD ..d' ~9i ,II 1C!~'1
/ I "J /
Lab SetID: II 0 ifGlJ
Samples Were: cac Tape Was: Container Type: No. Rec.
Jl Shipped By: l.{tc'S "" Present on Outer Package ~ AL Supplied Plastic
D Hand Delivered DYes DNa DNiA D A W ~pplied Clear Glass
D Ambient ~~(en on Outer package D AWAL Su~Amber Glass
:0" Chilled O'VI r'~ o .es DNo DN/A D A WAL SUPPlied~OX Vials
Temperature Y.O °C ~~nt on Sample D Amber D Clear 0 Heads e D No Headspace
Rec. BrokeniLeakin~ DYes XI No DN/A DYes DNa DN/A D Non A WAL Supplied eontain~
Notes: unbro~~ Sample Notes: ~ DYes D 0 DN/A
Properly Preserved %yes DNo DN/A Notes:
Notes:
Rec. Within Hold J;l!Yes DNa Discrepancies Between Labels and cac DYes ..-£'No
Notes: -~ Notes:
i
.150«.1.,-rp-.-Preservative All pHs OK
Ammonia ~.H~S04
eOD pH <2 H2S""O:i---
Cyanide PH>12NaOH ----Metals _R.H <2 HN03 --. t--
N02 &N01 pH <2 H2S04 r---.
Nutrients pH <2 H2SO4 ---O&G pH <2 HCL ~
Phenols pH <2 H2SO4 ~
Sulfide pH> 9NaOH, ZnAC -.....,
TKN pH <2 H2SO4 ..............
TOe pH <2 H3P04 ~
TP04 pFl <2 H2SO4 ..............
TPH pH <2 HCL r-.......
........... r-,
"""'-~ .............. -.. -" . , .... . t·, .....
2) Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
3) Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
4) If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
5) Flag eoe and notify client for further instructions
6) Place client conversation on eoe
7) Samples may be adjusted at client request
UPS Internet Shipping: Shipment Label
UPS Internet Shipping: View/Print Label
1. Print the label(s}: Select the Print button on the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your browser
does not support this function select Print from the File menu to print the label.
2. Fold the printed label at the solid line below. Place the label in a UPS Shipping Pouch. If you do
not have a pouch, affix the folded label using clear plastic shipping tape over the entire label.
3. GETTING YOUR SHIPMENT TO UPS
Customers without a Daily Pickup
Schedule a same day or future day Pickup to have a UPS driver pickup all of your Internet Shipping
packages.
Hand the package to any UPS driver in your area.
Take your package to any location of The UPS Store®, UPS Drop Box, UPS Customer Center, UPS
Alliances (Office Depot® or Staples®) or Authorized Shipping Outlet near you. Items sent via UPS
Return Services{SM) (including via Ground) are also accepted at Drop Boxes. To find the location
nearest you, please visit the 'Find locations' Quick link at ups. com.
Customers with a Daily Pickup
Your driver will pickup your shipment(s) as usual.
FOLD HERE
.-t
1:1.
m
0 V .-t V 0 I rl ~' 0\ rl ~ ~ .... 10 ~ ~ r-4 Ul N <'i 0 5 5 ~ V ~
til I ! L/)
!:9 6 .....:l 1""1 00 6 1""1
0 ~ .... .-....... co ~ ~~s E-4
~ ~§~ ::J
lii t-o t-oUl""" .-i Ul UlOU V 0 ~ ~o 00 u
C!I ~ ... ~-o ~~ '" ... ~~~~ a 2.,..,~ F: gj:::(t) ~~~~s o~~53;s:E-t Il. ~ ~~~ g F<~~~M<1 6 <~g";Q ~<o -oVl ~~~~3 IE 00 v ~ ::3 _ .... Cl"'OC III co
,
Page 1 of 1
https:/ /www.ups.com/uis/create? ActionOriginPair=default PrintWindowPage&key=labet.. 9/8/2011
EN:RGY
.\ ')1., I I ~I "
lWtW.energylab.com
AM/JfIaJ &r:MIIta ~ /111
Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 81&-118-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Sl!tlon. TX 811-&90-2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
October 04, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11090325 Quote 10: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 9 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 9/9/2011 for analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11090325-001 MW-11 09/07/11 15:1509/09/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C 11090325-002 MW-25 09/07/11 11:10 09/09/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11090325-003 MW-26 09/07/11 9:15 09/09/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11090325-004 MW-30 09/07/11 10:45 09/09/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C11090325-005 MW-31 09/06/11 14:10 09/09/11 Aqueous Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
C11090325-006 MW-35 09/07/11 12:40 09/09/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11090325-007 MW-65 09/07/11 12:4009/09/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11090325-008 Trip Blank 6092 09/07/11 0:00 09/09/11 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11090325-009 Temp Blank 09/07/11 0:00 09/09/11 Aqueous Temperature
The analyses presented in this report were performed at Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper,
WY 82601, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory
Analytical Report, the QAlQC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. All samples are reported on an as received
basis unless otherwise indicated.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: c5t.?~ J) <JtJ.~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011 .10.0413:16:45 -06:00
Page 1 of21
www.energylab.com Helena, MT 817-472-0711 -Billings, MT 800-735-4489 -Casper, WY 888-235-0515
AR/ffIaI EallaclSIIu'IIU Gillette WY 866-&86-7175 -Re Id C SD 888-672-1225 -Colle & Station 1X 888-890-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011 Report Date: 10104/11
Sample Delivery Group: C 11090325 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4'C (±2'C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIUSOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 21
EN:RGY
/'1 .()I~;\1 ~)HI' ~
www.energylab.com
AMJtfkII ExaIIIIa SIncI /IIZ
Helena, MT 877·472·0711 -Billings, MT BoO·735·4481 -Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillatte, WY 818-&B8-7175 -Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 -College Station, IX 8B8-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLK1_110912
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
NO
Units
mg/L
Sample 10: LCS1_110912 Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1000 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090326-G01BOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 1850 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090347-G01AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2180 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090325
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: BAL-l_110912A
10
Run: BAL-l 110912A -
10 100 90 110
Run: BAL-l 110912A -
10
Run: BAL-l_ll0912A
10 102 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPDLimit Qual
Batch: 110912_1_SLDS-TDS-W
09/12/11 10:58
0.1
09/12/11 10:58
09/12/11 11 :02
10
09/12/11 11 :05
Page 12 of 21
EN:RGY
1\· '01-1 ,I 2""j ~_
_.energyiab.com
Au/1ffU(~S1nu "$1
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT Boo-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 818-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-172-1225 • College Station, TX 881-680-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-110926
Chloride
Sample 10: C11090420-o02AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C11090420-o02AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-110926
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
44.2 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
44.2 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3590 mg/L
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090325
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Batch: 110926-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_11 0927A 09/27/11 13:41
1.0
Run: TITRATION_11 0927 A 09/27/11 14:27
1.0 101 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110927A 09/27/11 14:29
1.0 101 90 110 0.0 10
Run: TITRATION_11 0927A 09/27/11 14:32
1.0 101 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 21
EN:RGY
l\~uPI\I _lUI! :....
www.energytab.com
AMI!tkM~"'1!Z
Helena, MT 871-412-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
GillBtta, WY 888-886-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • College Station, 1]( 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4S00-S04 E
Sample 10: MBLK-1_
Sulfate
Sample 10: LCS21_
Sulfate
Sample 10: C1109032S"()OSAMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C1109032S"()OSAMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
5060 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
721 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
724 mg/L
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090325
RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Batch: 11 0916_1_S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_110916A 09/16/11 10:43
10
Run: TURB-2_11 0916A 09/16/1111:19
100 105 90 110
Run: TURB-2_11 0916A 09/16/11 15:28
10 94 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110916A 09/16/11 15:35
10 95 90 110 0.4 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 14 of 21
EN:RGY
1\ J.o", I /"' ': -I '
www.energyiab.com
bI/ftk.II~ SiDclIJU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-735·44811 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GiIIBtta, WY 888-&8&-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 . College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB
Manganese
Uranium
Sample 10: LFB
Manganese
Uranium
Sample 10: C11090254-007CMS4
Manganese
Uranium
Sample 10: C11090254-007CMSO
Manganese
Uranium
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: C11090346-003CMS4
Selenium
Sample 10: C11090346-003CMSO
Selenium
Sample 10: LRB
Selenium
Sample 10: LFB
Selenium
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
2
2
2
2
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
NO mg/L
NO mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0496 mg/L
0.0488 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0471 mg/L
0.0526 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0501 mg/L
0.0563 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
0.0510 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0532 mg/L
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Laboratory Fortified Blank
0.0501 mg/L
RL
0.010
0.00030
0.0010
0.00030
0.010
0.00030
0.010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0050
0.0010
Report Date: 10/04/11
Work Order: C11090325
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Run : ICPMS4-C_11 0909A
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0909A
99 85 115
98 85 115
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0909A
92 70 130
91 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0909A
99 70 130
99 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_110913A
102 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0913A
106 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_110913A
Run: ICPMS4-C_11 0913A
100 85 115
Batch: R150423A
09/09/11 12 :25
09/09/11 12:30
09/09/11 16 :48
09/09/11 16:53
6.3 20
6.8 20
4.2
Batch: R150571A
09/13/11 19:05
09/13/11 19:09
20
09/13/11 13:26
09/13/11 14:27
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 150f21
EN:RGY
, .... ·-OP .. \I !JPl ~,
WWN.energylab.com
AM/ftIAI fJIr:IIIIIIa S1IIu IIU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4481 -Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatte, WY 888-886-7175 -Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 -College Station, TX 688-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method 81ank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N NO mg/L
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.47 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-3 Laboratory Fortified 81ank
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.04 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090322-o010MS Sample Matrix Spike
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 1.98 mg/L
Sample 10: C11090322-o010MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.03 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
Report Date: 10/04/11
Work Order: C11090325
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
8atch: R150428
Run: TECHNICON_11 09098 09/09/11 15 :20
Run: TECHNICON_11 09098 09/09/11 15 :23
99 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 09098 09/09/11 15 :25
104 90 110
Run : TECHNICON_11 09098 09/09/11 16:28
101 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_1109098 09/09/11 16:30
104 90 110 2.5 10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 21
Ei'ERGY
I\dUF~.'\t .\I<il' '-'
www.energylab.com
AM/ffIaI baIIMa .. 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-1515
GillattB, WY 81&-IB&-7175 . Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 . College Station, IX 881-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: MB-GA-0475
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Count Result
3 Method Blank
0.299
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.268
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.370
Units
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCilL
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0475
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Laboratory Control Sample
Sample 10: C11090162-0011MS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: C11090162-0011MSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
20.0 pCilL
Sample Matrix Spike
52.2 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
57.4 pCl/L
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090325
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmit Qual
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 _110909A
Run: BERTHOLD 770-C 110909A
94 70 130
Run : BERTHOLD 770-1 -110909A
97 70 130
Run: BERTHOLD 770-1 110909A -
109 70 130 9.5
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Batch: GA-0475
09/15/11 15:47
U
09/15/11 15:47
09/15/11 17:56
09/15/11 17:56
21 .6
Page 17 of 21
EN:RGY
. I '-1 I
www.energyiab.com
AM/ffIaI~ShIU IIIS1
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillett8, WY 886-686-7175 . Rapid City, SIJ 888-672-1225 . College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: SW8260B
Sample 10: 091511_LCS_ 4 15 Laboratory Control Sample
Benzene 10 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 9.7 ug/L
Chloroform 10.0 uglL
Chloromethane 9.4 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 20 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 100 ug/L
Methylene chloride 9.8 ug/L
Naphthalene 10 ug/L
o-Xylene 9.8 ug/L
Toluene 10 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 29 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: 091511_MBLK_6 15 Method Blank
Benzene NO ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L
Chloroform NO ug/L
Chloromethane NO ug/L
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L
Methylene chloride NO ug/L
Naphthalene NO ug/L
o-Xylene NO ug/L
Toluene NO ug/L
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C11090325-003EMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike
Benzene 2100 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 2100 ug/L
Chloroform 3400 ug/L
Chloromethane 1900 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 4000 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 20000 ug/L
Methylene chloride 2000 ug/L
Naphthalene 2200 uglL
o-Xylene 1900 ug/L
Toluene 2100 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 5900 ug/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
100
100
100
100
100
2000
100
100
100
100
100
Report Date: 10104/11
Work Order: C11090325
%REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R150703
Run: SATURNCA_ll 0915A 09/15/11 12:51
101 70 130
97 70 130
100 70 130
94 70 130
98 70 130
104 70 130
98 70 130
103 70 130
98 70 130
104 70 130
98 70 130
92 80 120
98 70 130
88 80 130
91 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_110915A 09/15/11 14:03
99 80 120
101 70 130
88 80 120
86 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_110915A 09/15/11 20:33
103 70 130
104 70 130
108 70 130
97 70 130
100 70 130
102 70 130
101 70 130
110 70 130
95 70 130
105 70 130
98 70 130
NO -Not delecled at the reporting limit.
Page 18 of 21
EN:RGY
_"~L~I..,t/\.1 CHk'
www.energylab.com
~~"'1f2
Helena, MT 817·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Caspar, WY 888·235·0515
Gillatte, WY 811·186·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·172·1225 • Collage Station, 1X 888·690·2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 10104/11
Project: September Monthly Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11090325
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R150703
Sample 10: C11090325-D03EMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_110915A 09/15/11 20:33
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 98 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 99 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 97 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 88 80 120
Sample 10: C11090325-D03EMSD 15 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SATURNCA_110915A 09/15/11 21 :09
Benzene 2000 ug/L 100 101 70 130 2.0 20
Carbon tetrachloride 2000 ug/L 100 101 70 130 3.1 20
Chloroform 3400 ug/L 100 105 70 130 1.7 20
Chloromethane 1900 ug/L 100 94 70 130 3.8 20
m+p-Xylenes 3700 ug/L 100 93 70 130 6.9 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 21000 ug/L 2000 107 70 130 4.6 20
Methylene chloride 2000 ug/L 100 102 70 130 1.6 20
Naphthalene 2200 ug/L 100 109 70 130 1.1 20
a-Xylene 1800 ug/L 100 90 70 130 4.8 20
Toluene 2000 ug/L 100 102 70 130 2.7 20
Xylenes, Total 5500 ug/L 100 92 70 130 6.2 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 96 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 100 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 90 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 88 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 19 of 21
EN:RGY
i\t,::.J11~""1 :J1.Jj· .~
www.energylab.com
~ElaIIIM:I s.rc. 'IU
Halena, MT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 · Caspar, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 888-888-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-872-1225 • Collage Station, 1X 888-690-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I
C11090325
Login completed by: Edith McPike
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 9/14/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sampte bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
(Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters
such as pH, DO, Res CI, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.)
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero heads pace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
2.2"C On Ice
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Date Received: 9/9/2011
Received by: kg
Carrier FedEx
name:
No 0
NoO
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0'
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable 0
Page 20 of 21
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page ~ of ....l..-LAIJO/~A TORI! S . ------. . ....... \." _ ... _---.". __ ...... _ .. ,._ ... _ .. --.., ...... --.. _._ .• ,
Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance: D<.ni~ Min~ .s~p+ember MOf\+l,l,j G-rowtti WA+~1" ~Oll State: u'T" Yes iI No 0
Report Mail Address: Pc> B Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print) 0'1. ~O'f R~M fAlfVIv 435 fo 78 .7.Z2..1 ...,.; &t'" ~ol\:J~t ~ JAtJ~,,~ \AT ~ ''is 11 ""',. &tMrtn fP.lI.I .... CI"
Invoice Address: '-J Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
~tAMc. ~(1.M,( ..)
Special ReporVFormats: ~ !Mtl&l1~ ~~@M~rn[ID .. Contact ELI prior to F£~~ Cl .... RUSH sample submittal ~O"'~ 1 -.. R for charges and Cooler IO($}!'
~CD~OI t» ~ Q ~ scheduling -See L l"(~ /-.-> 0 >-ro w C Instruction Page o OW 0 EOD/EDT(Electronic Data) ~CJ)~ m ~ ~ :i I "0 o POTWIWWTP Format: 03:'8 II! 0) ~ c Comments: Rec;e;ptTemp ~l u<(/)~Q~ \0 C B u ~.? °c I o State: 0 LEVEL IV '5 .... OJI c \J 1 .. •• cu c: .c:: I-(1\ ~ ~ro.Q Cl '" j ~ E <:!)N o Other: 0 NELAC ~Iro • " ~ • ::1 On Ice:
::J cu.!:;; a; ~ C -t -.~ f-5 zCi.<!I ~Cl g. ....~ ~ ~ W "E Custody Seal
E >1 ~e ~ £J w ro On Bottle Y N C\I Cf) "0 On Cooler ~: en ~ ~ ~ j i ~ .~ c C\I
1 Ci5 H Intact
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection 'l: :s ~ ~ --~ 6 N MATRIX \-.J Signature
~Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time \J Match
1
M\I-1\ qJ"'1/11 '515 l-W ~ ~
2 M\J -;2.5 1CV7/1/ 11\0 I-W ~ ~-
3 MW-~b ev-r/\f e>t:\\S (D-W '/., ~ '" 'f. "'/. ~ IQ)
nnn
~ .MW-3~ 1'111//\ IDI.{~ -:!>-w )( j.. Ix ~
5 MW-~1 caJrJll )4\0 ;2.-\V Y. .~ y.. I~ ~
6 Mv.>-~ ~11/11 );t'40 It.l.-w I~ 'f.. ~
7 Mw _ ~b 1/7/1\ l:t~O I-W 'I.. 'f... ~
8 -1i",~ '}3.b"k Ln tt 2 lIi!ll ~ff#LUaf
9 liPiD /VAIIi/. ~ I~
10 I ~
Custody :z:; blf:iJtflw q/~;~rro\l30 """, .. AJU~ llna;;j .. Received by (print): Datemme: Signature:
Record RlilinQIJlslfed by (pfinl~ ..j Dalel1lmei Signature: V ReceIVed by (pfln!): Datemme: Signature:
MUST be
. Signed K_lvecJ DY LaDOralOry: (r:tf~il '13 fa ~~4-Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal:
In certain Circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
VISit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
TabG
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1A: Routine Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
Time Req'd for 2 Time Pumped Amount
Well Sample-Date Casings (min) Sufficient? Conductance RPD(%) pH RPD(%) Temp Cq RPD(%) Redox Potential (Eh) RPD(%) Turbidity (NTU)
MW-2 8/8/2011 113.74 120 Y 2590 2594 0.15 6.75 6.71 0.59 16.49 16.61 0.73 370 368 0.54 0 0
MW-3 8/10/2011 46.57 53 Y 5839 5829 0.17 6.33 6.32 0.16 15.78 15.8 0.13 413 407 1.46 0 0
MW-3A 8Jt 11201 1 60.46 45 Pumped dry 6189 NC 6.19 NC 17.09 NC 458 NC 0
MW-5 8/9/2011 194.99 200 Y 2906 2901 0.17 7.24 7.22 0.28 15.93 15.91 0.13 141 140 0.71 7.2 7.22
MW-11 8/3/2011 247.05 250 Y 2950.0 2945.0 0.17 7.25 7.25 0.00 15.55 15.59 0.26 113 112 0.89 16.3 16.1
MW-l2 81912011 131.80 120 Pumped dry 4155 NC 6.13 NC 16.64 NC 360 NC 16.1
MW-14 8/3/2011 148.14 150 Y 2912 2948 1.23 6.22 6.23 0.16 15.87 15.93 0.38 261 259 0.77 0 0
MW-14 Resample 8/30/2011 149.73 155 Y 4064 4065 0.02 6.41 6.41 0.00 15.59 15.4 1.23 244 244 0.00 0 0
MW-18 8110/2011 383.67 390 Y 3500 3537 1.05 5.95 5.95 0.00 16.28 16.35 0.43 306 302 1.32 0 0
MW-18 Resample 9/21/2011 383.67 390 Y 3432 3430 0.06 6.31 6.3 0.16 18.80 18.80 0.00 412 405 1.71 0 0
MW-19 7/20/2011 586.40 600 Y 1905 1901 0.21 6.65 6.65 0.00 15.18 15.15 0.20 472 470 0.42 3.8 3.8
MW-23 8/412011 112.39 100 Pumped dry 2610 NC 6.38 NC 18.8 NC 432 NC 22.1
MW-24 8/412011 36.45 3S Pumped dry 3918 NC 6.45 NC 22.34 NC 196 NC 0
MW-25 8/312011 242.78 260 Y 3218 3227 0.28 6.42 6.42 0.00 15.41 15.33 0.52 249 249 0.00 0 0
MW -25 Rcsample 8/30/2011 244.16 250 Y 3317 3314 0.09 6.54 6.54 0.00 15.33 15.35 0.13 528 520 1.53 0 0
MW-26 8/3/2011 Continuously pumped well 3549 NC 6.07 NC 15.62 NC 403 NC 0
MW-26 Rcsamplc 8/3012011 Conlinuously pumped well 3614 NC 6.58 NC 16.57 NC 414 NC 0
MW-27 8/8/2011 263.78 270 Y 1512 1520 0.53 6.38 6.39 0.16 16.62 16.81 1.14 361 356 1.39 8.1 8.1
MW-28 8/812011 198.18 200 Y 4067 4071 0.10 5.82 5.78 0.69 15.85 15.81 0.25 462 460 0.43 0 0
MW-29 819/2011 149.55 150 Y 4844 4840 0.08 6.23 6.2 0.48 15.07 15.05 0.13 248 247 0.40 16.9 17
MW-30 8/3/2011 201.01 210 Y 2120 2117 0.14 6.60 6.61 0.15 15.81 15.8 0.06 228 226 0.88 0 0
MW-31 8/2/2011 367.48 370 Y 1915 1913 0.10 6.66 6.67 0.15 15.51 15.49 0.13 450 448 0.45 0 0
MW-32 8/2/2011 338.23 340 Y 4106 4112 0.15 6.09 6.1 0.16 15.17 15.18 0.07 218 216 0.92 16.9 17.1
MW-32 Resample 8/30/2011 339.43 405 Y 4109 4119 0.24 6.21 6.2 0.16 15.6 15.48 0.77 207 207 0.00 8 8.1
MW-35 8/2/2011 72.70 75 Y 4333 4324 0.21 6.25 6.25 0.00 15.35 15.35 0.00 306 305 0.33 0 0
MW-35 Resample 8/30/2011 74.02 80 Y 4286 4298 0.28 6.40 6.4 0.00 16.19 16.15 0.25 246 245 0.41 0 0
MW-36 8/9/2011 67.04 115 Y 359 361.2 0.61 6.57 6.57 0.00 16.79 16.81 0.12 308 304 1.31 0 0
MW-37 8/1112011 NA 4716 NC 6.86 NC 16.43 NC 406 NC 174.6
The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (HNTV") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that tUrbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted
observations regarding turbidity measurements less than 5 NTU are included for information purposes only.
MW -26 is a continuously pumped well. Per the QAP, only one set of parameters are required to be collected from continuously pumped wells.
Well was pumped dry
N/ A = The amount of water in the well was insufficient to pump. The pump was not able to operate due to the minimal amount of water. The well was sampled with a bailer.
NC = Not calculated.
>5NTU RPD(%)
N 0.00
N 0.00
N NC
Y 0.28
Y 1.23
Y NC
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y NC
N NC
N 0.00
N 0.00
N NC
N NC
Y 0.00
N 0.00
Y 0.59
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y 1.18
Y 1.24
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y NC
G-IB: Acelerated Field Data QA/QC Evaluation
Time Req'd for 2 Time Pumped Amount
Well Sample Date Casings (min) Sufficient? Conductance RPD(%) pH
Accelerated May Monthly
MW-11 7/6/2011 247.1 290.0 Y 2907 2908 0.03 7.04 7.07
MW-14 7/5/2011 149.0 165.0 Y 3936 3936 0.00 6.45 6.40
MW-25 7/6/2011 242.9 300.0 Y 3218 3218 0.00 6.31 6.29
MW-26 7/6/2011 NA 3471 NC 6.35
MW-30 7/5/2011 201.3 205.0 Y 2064 2061 0.15 6.66 6.65
MW-31 7/5/2011 368.4 370.0 Y 1840 1832 0.44 6.62 6.64
MW-35 7/20/2011 72.5 75.0 Y 2284 2286 0.09 6.51 6.49
Accelerated June Monthly
MW-11 91712011 247.7 250.0 Y 2827 2838 0.39 7.29
MW-14 9/8/2011 149.1 152.0 Y 4053 4053 0.00 6.5
MW-25 91712011 242.6 245.0 Y 3326 3323 0.09 6.54
MW-26 91712011 NA 3569 NC 6.71
MW-30 91712011 201.6 205.0 Y 2148 2148 0.00 6.8
MW-31 9/6/2011 368.0 370.0 Y 1918 1920 0.10 7.03
MW-35 91712011 72.6 75.0 Y 16.9 16.3 3.61 6.44
The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (UNTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a
higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements less than 5 NTU are included for information purposes only.
MW-26 is a continuously pumped well.
7.29
6.5
6.54
6.8
7.03
6.47
RPD(%) Temp ('C) RPD(%) Redox Potential (Eb) RPD(%) Turbidity (NTU) <5 (NTU) RPD(%)
0.43 15.60 15.61 0.06 93 93 0.00 0 0 y 0.00
0.78 15.59 15.6 0.06 38 39 2.60 <1 <1 Y 0.00
0.32 15.22 15.21 0.07 110 110 0.00 1.6 1.6 Y 0.00
NC 15.37 NC 181 NC <1 Y NC
0.15 15.07 15.08 0.07 158 161 1.88 <1 <1 Y 0.00
0.30 15.64 15.59 0.32 229 229 0.00 <1 <1 Y 0.00
0.31 15.51 15.52 0.06 299 295 1.35 0 0 y 0.00
0.00 16.13 16.25 0.74 118 118 0.00 42.2 4Q.9 N 3.13
0.00 15.12 15.18 0.40 452 446 1.34 0 0 y 0.00
0.00 15.37 15.39 0.13 253 254 0.00 2.2 2.3 Y 4.44
NC 15.11 NC 358 NC 0 Y 0.00
0.00 15.26 15.31 0.33 281 281 0.00 0 0 y 0.00
0.00 15.41 15.36 0.32 450 444 1.34 0 0 y 0.00
0.46 15.67 15.99 2.02 247 247 0.00 0 0 y 0.00
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-2 MW-3 MW-3A MW-S
Constituent Time 8/8/2011 8110/2011 8/1112011 8/9/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days -------
Acetone 14 days -------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days -----
Arsenic 6 months --.--
Benzene 14 days ------
Beryllium 6 months -------
Cadmium 6 months ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days -'-----
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days ------
Chloroform 14 days -------
Chloromethane 14 days -------
Chromium 6 months -------
Cobalt 6 months ---,----
Copper 6 months ------
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days -----
Fluoride (MgIL) 28 days --5.1 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 6 months 24.2 days -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 24.2 days -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 24.2 days -----
Iron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) -------
Lead 6 months --------
Manganese 6 months -------
Mercury 28 days --------
Molybdenum 6 months --------
Naphthalene 14 days --------
Nickel 6 months -------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days --------
Selenium 6 months --6.7 days 5.8 days -
Silver 6 months -------
Sulfate CmglL) 28 days ----11A days --
'rOS (mgIL) 7 days ----1.4 days --
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days -------
Thallium 6 months --------
Tin 6 months --------
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months ------8.2 days
Vanadium 6 months -------
Xylenes (total) 14 days ----,----
Zinc 6 months -------
NC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ---------
Anions BALANCE-W ----------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days --------
Calcium 6 months -------
Carbonate as C03 14 days -------
Cations BALANCE-W -------
Magnesium 6 months -----
Potassium 6 months -------
Sodium 6 months -------
G-2A: HoldiJlg Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-11 MW-12 MW-14 MW-14
Constituent Time 8/312011 8/9/2011 8/3/2011 8/30/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 5.3 days -5.2 days -
Acetone 14 days 5.3 days -5.2 days --
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 8.2 days ---3.1 days
Arsenic 6 months 5.9 days ---3.1 days
Senzene 14 days 5.3 days --5.2 days -
Seryllium 6 months 5.9 days ---8.3 days
Cadmium 6 months 5.9 days ---3.1 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 5.3 days -5.2 days --
Chloride (mglL) 28 days 7.1 days --6.9 days -
Chloroform 14 days 5.3 days --5.2 days -
Chloromethane 14 days 5.3 days .-5.2 days -
Chromium 6 months 5.9 days -.-_.-3.1 days
Cobalt 6 months 5.9 days ----3.1 days
Copper 6 months 5.9 days ----3.1 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 5.3 days -5.2 days -
Fluoride (MglL) 28 days 5.1 days -5 days .-
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 15.1 days .. -16.1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 15.1 days ---16.1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 15.1 days ---16.1 days
[ron 6 months 12.1 days _. --15 days
Lab pH (S.u.) --2.2 days -2.1 days -
Lead 6 months 5.9 days ----3.1 days
Manganese 6 months 5.9 days --3.1 days
Mercury 28 days 5.9 days ---3.1 days
Molybdenum 6 months 5.9 days ---3.1 days
Naphthalene 14 days 5.3 days -5.2 days --
Nickel 6 months 5.9 days ---7 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 5.1 days ---2.2 days
Selenium 6 months 5.9 days 7.8 days --3.1 days
Silver 6 months 5.9 days ----3.1 days
Sulfate (mgll) 28 days 19.2 days -19.1 days --
TDS (mglL) 7 days 2.3 days --2.2 days --
Tetrah ydrofuran 14 days 2.4 days --2.4 days -
Thallium 6 months 5.9 days --.-3.1 days
Tin 6 months 5.9 days ---3.1 days
Toluene 14 days 5.3 days -5.2 days _.
Uranium 6 months 5.9 days ----3.1 days
Vanadium 6 months 5.9 days ----3.1 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 5.3 days --5.2 days --
Zinc 6 months 28.1 days ---3.1 days
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W -27 days --64.1 days -
Anions BALANCE-W -27 days .. 64.1 days --
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2.3 days -2.2 days --
Calcium 6 months 12.1 days --.. 15 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2.3 days --2.2 days --
Cations BALANCE-W .. 27 days --64.1 days _.
Magnesium 6 months 12.1 days ----15 days
Potassium 6 months 12.1 days ----15 days
Sodium 6 months 12.1 days ----15 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-18 MW·18 MW-19 MW-23
Constituent Time 8/10/2011 9/21/2011 7/20/2011 8/412011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ------
Acetone 14 days -------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days -------
Arsenic 6 months -----
Benzene 14 days -------
Beryllium 6 months -------
Cad mi1J m 6 months ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days -------
Chloride CmglL) 28 days -------
Chloroform 14 days ------
Chloromethane 14 days ------
Chromium 6 months ------
Cobalt 6 months -------
Copper 6 months --------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days -------
Fluoride (MglL) 28 days -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
[ron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) ---------
Lead 6 months -------
Manganese 6 months ------
Mercury 28 days ------
Molybdenum 6 months ------
Naphthalene 14 days -------
Nickel 6 months -------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days -------
Selenium 6 months --------
Silver 6 months --------
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days 12.1 days ------
TDS (mglL) 7 days 2.1 days ------
Tetrah ydrofu ran 14 days ---- ---
Thallium 6 months 7.2 days 9.3 days --
Tin 6 months -------
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months --------
Vanadium 6 months ------
Xylenes (total) 14 days -----
Zinc 6 months --------
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --------
Anions BALANCE-W ---------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ------
Calcium 6 months ------
Carbonate as C03 14 days -------
Cations BALANCE-W ---------
Magnesium 6 months ------
Potassium 6 months -----
Sodium 6 months -------
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Holding MW-24 MW-2S MW-2S MW-26
Constituent Time 8/4/2011 8/3/2011 8/30/2011 8/312011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --5.3 days --6 days
Acetone 14 days --5.3 days --6 days
Ammonia (as N) 28 days --8.2 days --8.3 days
Arsenic 6 months ---3.2 days -
Benzene 14 days --5.3 days -6 days
Beryllium 6 months ---8.4 days -
Cadmium 6 months 5 days --3.2 days -
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --5.3 days --6 days
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days .-7.1 days -: 7.2 days
Chloroform 14 days --5.3 days -5.9 days
Chloromethane 14 days --5.3 days --6 days
Chromium 6 months ----7.1 days -
Cobalt 6 months . --. 7.1 days --
Copper 6 months ---3.2 days .-
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --5.3 days -6 days
Fluoride (MglL) 28 days --5.1 days -5.2 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months ---16.3 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months _. --16.3 days -
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ----16.3 days --
[ron 6 months ---15.2 days --
Lab pH (S.U.) ----2.2 days --2.3 days
Lead 6 months ----3.2 days --
Manganese 6 months ----7.1 days --
Mercury 28 days ---3.2 days --
Molybdenum 6 months ---3.2 days --
Naphthalene 14 days --5.3 days --6 days
Nickel 6 months ----7.1 days --
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days --5.1 days -5.2 days
Selenium 6 months ---3.2 days -
Silver 6 months ----3.2 days -
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days -19.2 days --19.3 days
TDS (mglL) 7 days --6.2 days -2.4 days
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days -2.4 days --2.4 days
Thallium 6 months 5 days -,-3.2 days --
Tin 6 months ---3.2 days --
Toluene 14 days --5.3 days --6 days
Uranium 6 months ----3.2 days --
Vanadium 6 months ---7.1 days --
Xylenes (total) 14 days --5.3 days -6 days
Zinc 6 months --3.2 days --
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W --64.2 days --64.3 days
Anions BALANCE-W --64.2 days --64.3 days
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days -2.3 days -2.4 days
Calcium 6 months ---15.2 days -
Carbonate as C03 14 days --2.3 days --2.4 days
Cations BALANCE-W ----64.2 days --64.3 days
Magnesium 6 months ----15.2 days -
Potassium 6 months ----15.2 days --
Sodium 6 months ---15.2 days --
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-26 MW-27 MW-28 MW-29
Constituent Time 8/30/2011 8/8/2011 8/8/2011 8/9/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days --------
Acetone 14 days -------
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ------
Arsenic 6 months 3.2 days ------
Benzene 14 days -------
Beryllium 6 months 9.5 days ------
Cadmium 6 months 3.2 days ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ------
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days --14 days 14 days --
Chloroform 14 days --------
Chloromethane 14 days ------
Chromium 6 months 8.4 days -----
Cobalt 6 months 9.5 days ---
Copper 6 months 8.4 days ---
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ------
Fluoride (MgIL) 28 days ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 16.3 days 24.3 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 16.3 days 24.3 days ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 16.3 days 24.3 days ---
Iron 6 months 15.2 days --35.2 days
Lab pH (S.U.) ---_. ---
Lead 6 months 3.2 days ----
Manganese 6 months 9.5 days -----
Mercury 28 days 3.2 days ----
Molybdenum 6 months 3.2 days ----
Naphthalene 14 days -----
Nickel 6 months 8.4 days -----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days _. 8.1 days --
Selenium 6 months 3.2 days ----
Silver 6 months 3.2 days -----
Sulfate (mglL) 28 days -14.2 days --
TDS (mglL) 7 days -4.2 days ---
Tel rahydrofu ran 14 days -------
Thallium 6 months 3.2 days ----
Tin 6 months 3.2 days ----
Toluene 14 days ------
Uranium 6 months 7.1 days ----
Vanadium 6 months 8.4 days -----
Xylenes (total) 14 days -------
Zinc 6 months 3.2 days -----
NC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ----------
Anions BALANCE-W ---------
Bicarbonate as RC03 14 days -------
Calcium 6 months 15.2 days -----
Carbonate as C03 14 days --------
Cations BALANCE-W ----------
Magnesium 6 months 15.2 days ------
Potassium 6 months 15.2 days ------
Sodium 6 months 15.2 days ------
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-30 MW-31 MW-32 MW-32
Constituent Time 8/3/2011 8/2/2011 8/2/2011 8/30/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ----
Acetone 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ----
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 8 days 9 days --
Arsenic 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Benzene 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ---
Beryllium 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days -8.3 days
Cadmium 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days -7 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days .---
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days 6.9 days 7.9 days --
Chloroform 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ---
Chloromethane 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ---
Chromium 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days -3.1 days
Cobalt 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days -3.1 days
Copper 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ---
Fluoride (MgIL) 28 days 4.9 days 5.9 days ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 6 months 14.9 days 16.1 days --16.1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 14.9 days 16.1 days --16.1 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 14.9 days 16.1 days -16.1 days
Iron 6 months 12 days 13 days --15.1 days
Lab pH (S.U.) -2.1 days 3.1 days ----
Lead 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Manganese 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Mercury 28 days 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Molybdenum 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Naphthalene 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ----
Nickel 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --7 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 4.9 days 6 days ----
Selenium 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Silver 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Sulfate (mglL) 28 days 19.1 days 20.1 days ----
TDS (mglL) 7 days 2.1 days 3.1 days ----
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2.4 days 3.4 days ----
Thallium 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Tin 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Toluene 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ----
Uranium 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --7 days
Vanadium 6 months 5.7 days 6.8 days --3.1 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 5.2 days 6.2 days ----
Zinc 6 months 27.2 days 28.2 days --3.1 days
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W -26.8 days 27.8 days ---
Anions BALANCE-W -26.8 days 27.8 days ---
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 2.2 days 3.2 days ---
Calcium 6 months 12 days 13 days -15.1 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 2.2 days 3.2 days ----
Cations BALANCE-W --26.8 days 27.8 days ---
Magnesium 6 months 12 days 13 days --15.1 days
Potassium 6 months 12 days 13 days -15.1 days
Sodium 6 months 12 days 13 days --15.1 days
G-2A: Holding Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-35 MW-35 MW-65 MW-65
Constituent Time 8/2/2011 8/30/2011 8/312011 8/30/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 6.2 days -5.7 days -
Acetone 14 days 6.2 days --5.7 days --
Ammonia (as N) 28 days 9 days -8.3 days -
Arsenic 6 months -3.1 days -3.2 days
Benzene 14 days 6.2 days -5.7 days -
Beryllium 6 months -8.3 days --8.4 days
Cadmium 6 months --3.1 days --3.2 days
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 6.2 days --5.7 days --
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days 7.9 days --19.1 days -
Chloroform 14 day_s 6.2 days -7.3 days --
Chloromethane 14 days 6.2 days --5.7 days --
Chromium 6 months --8.3 days --3.2 days
Cobalt 6 months --8.3 days --3.2 days
Copper 6 months --7 days --3.2 days
Dichloromelhane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 6.2 days --5.7 da)'s --
Pluoride (Mg/L) 28 days 5.9 days --5.2 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months --16.1 days --16.2 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months --16.1 days --16.2 days
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months --16.1 days --16.2 days
Iron 6 months --15 days --15.2 days
Lab pH (S.U.) --3.1 days --2.3 days --
Lead 6 months --3.1 days --3.2 days
Manganese 6 months --8.3 days --3.2 days
Mercury 28 days --3.1 days --3.2 days
Molybdenum 6 months --3.1 days -3.2 days
Naphthalene 14 days 6.2 days --5.7 days --
Nickel 6 months --7 days --7.1 days
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 6 days -5.2 days -
Selenium 6 months --3.1 days -3.2 days
Silver 6 months --3.1 days --3.2 days
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days 20.1 days -19.3 days --ms (mgfL) 7 days 3.1 days --2.4 days -
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 3.4 days --2.4 days -
Thallium 6 months -3.1 days --3.2 days
Tin 6 months --3.1 days .-3.2 days
Toluene 14 days 6.2 days -5.7 days -
Uranium 6 months --7 days -3.2 days
Vanadium 6 months -3.1 days --3.2 days
Xylenes (total) 14 days 6.2 days -5.7 days --
Zinc 6 months -3.1 days --3.2 days
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W -,-65.1 days -64.3 days -
Anions BALANCE-W --65.1 days -64.3 days --
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days 3.2 days --2.5 days -
Calcium 6 months --15 days --15.2 days
Carbonate as C03 14 days 3.2 days --2.5 days --
Cations BALANCE-W --65.1 days --64.3 days -
Magnesium 6 months -15 days --15.2 days
Potassium 6 months --15 days -15.2 days
Sodium 6 months --15 days -15.2 days
G-2A-Holding Time Evaluation
QAPHolding MW-70 MW-70
Constituent Time 8/10/2011 9/2112011
'2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ----
Acetone 14 days ---
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ----
Arsenic 6 months ---
Benzene 14 days ----
Beryllium 6 months ----
Cadmium 6 months ----
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ---
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days ----
Chloroform 14 days ---
Chloromethane 14 days ----
Chromium 6 months ----
Cobalt 6 months ----
Copper 6 months ----
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ---
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC 6 months ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ---
Iron 6 months ---
f-,ab pH (S.u.) ----
Lead 6 months ----
Manganese 6 months ----
Mercury 28 days ---
Molybdenum 6 months ----
Naphthalene 14 days ----
Nickel 6 months ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days ---
Selenium 6 months --
Silver 6 months ---
Sulfate (mgIL) 28 days 12.1 days -
TOS (mgIL) 7 days 2.1 days --
Telrahydrofuran 14 days ---
Thallium 6 months -5.7 days
Tin 6 months ---
Toluene 14 days --
Uranium 6 months --
Vanadium 6 months ---
Xylenes (total) 14 days ---
Zinc 6 months ---
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W -----
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ---
Calcium 6 months ----
Carbonate as C03 14 days ---
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium 6 months ----
Potassium 6 months ---
Sodium 6 months -. --
G 2B Hid' TEl -0 109 tme va uatlOn-A cce erate d samp es
QAPHolding MW-14
Constituent Time MW-11 7/6/2011 7/5/2011 MW-257/6/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days -----
Acetone 14 days ----
Ammonia (as N) 28 days -----
Arsenic 6 months -----
Benzene 14 days ----
Beryllium 6 months -----
Cadmium 6 months ---
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days ----
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days _. ---
Chloroform 14 days -----
Chloromethane 14 days -. ----
Chromium 6 months ------
Cobalt 6 months ----
C()Pl'er 6 months ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days -----
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 d<lY~ -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ------
Iron 6 months -----
LabpH (S.U.) -----
Lead 6 months ---
Manganese 6 months 23 days ---
Mercury 28 days ----
Molybdenum 6 months ---
Naphthalene 14 days ----
Nickel 6 months ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days ---
Selenium 6 months ----
Silver 6 months -----
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days -----
TDS (mg/L) 7 days ------
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days 2.4 days ----
Thallium 6 months ------
Tin 6 months ----
Toluene 14 days -----
Uranium 6 months --4.9 days
Vanadium 6 months ----
Xylenes (total) 14 days ----
Zinc 6 months ----
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W -------
Anions BALANCE-W --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days -----
Calcium 6 months ----
Carbonate as C03 14 days -----
Cations BALANCE-W ------
Magnesium 6 months -----
Potassium 6 months ----
Sodium 6 months ------
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
QAPHolding
Constituent Time MW-267/6/2011 MW-30 7/5/2011 MW-317/5/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days 8.3 days ----
Acetone 14 days 8.3 days ---
Ammonia (as N) 28 days -----
Arsenic 6 months ------
Benzene 14 days 8.3 days ---
Beryllium 6 months ----
Cadmium 6 months -----
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days 8.3 days ---
Chloride (mgIL) 28 days 5.2 days 6.1 days 6 days
Chloroform 14 days 8.3 days ---
Chloromethane 14 days 8.3 days ---
Chromium 6 months ----
Cobalt 6 months ----
Copper 6 months -----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days 8.3 days ---
Field pH (S.u.) Immediate
Fluoride (MglL) 28 days -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months 12.2 days ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months 12.2 days ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months 12.2 days ---
Iron 6 months -----
Lab pH (S.U.) -----
Lead 6 months ----
Manganese 6 months -----
Mercury 28 days -----
Molybdenum 6 months -----
Naphthalene 14 days 8.3 days ---
Nickel 6 months -----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 6.3 days 7.1 days 7 days
Selenium 6 months -8 days --
Silver 6 months -----
Sulfate (mglL) 28 days ----21.1 days
TDS (mglL) 7 days 2.4 days --3.1 days
Telrahydrofuran 14 days -----
Thallium 6 months -----
Tin 6 months ------
Toluene 14 days 8.3 days ----
Uranium 6 months 5.1 days --
Vanadium 6 months -----
Xylenes (total) 14 days 8.3 days --
Zinc 6 months ----
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W -------
Anions BALANCE-W ----'---
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ------
Calcium 6 months ------
Carbonate as C03 14 days ------
Cations BALANCE-W -------
Ma!!Tlesium 6 months ------
Potassium 6 months -----
Sodium 6 months -----
G-2B' Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
QAPHolding MW-35 MW-14
Constituent Time 7/20/2011 MW-119/7/2011 9/8/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days ------
Acetone 14 days ----
Ammonia (as N) 28 days -----
Arsenic 6 months ------
Benzene 14 days -----
Beryllium 6 months -----
Cadmium 6 months -----
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days -----
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days ----
Chloroform 14 days -----
Chloromethane 14 days ----
Chromium 6 months ----
Cobalt 6 months ----
Copper 6 months ----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ---
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months -----
Iron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) ------
Lead 6 months ------
Manganese 6 months 16.6 days 2.2 days --
Mercury 28 days -----
Molybdenum 6 months ------
NaQ.hthalene 14 days -----
Nickel 6 months ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days -----
Selenium 6 months -----
Silver 6 months -----
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days ----
TDS (mg/L) 7 days ----
Tetrahydrofur81l 14 days --2.4 days --
Thallium 6 months -----
Tin 6 months -----
Toluene 14 days -----
Uranium 6 months 16.6 days --
Vanadium 6 months -----
Xylenes (total) 14 days -----
Zinc 6 months -----
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W -------
Anions BALANCE-W -------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ----
Calcium 6 months -----
Carbonate as C03 14 days ----
Cations BALANCE-W -------
Magnesium 6 months ----.. '-
Potassium 6 months -----
Sodium 6 months ----
G 2B Hid' TEl -0 lllg lme va uatlOn-A cce erate d samp es
QAPHolding
Constituent Time MW-2591712011 MW-2691712011 MW-30 91712011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 days -8.4 days --
Acetone 14 days -8.4 days --
Ammonia (as N) 28 days -----
Arsenic 6 months ----
Benzene 14 days --8.4 days --
Beryllium 6 months ----
Cadmium 6 months ------
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 days --8.4 days --
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days -20.2 days 20.1 days
Chloroform 14 days --8.4 days -
Chloromethane 14 days --8.4 days --
Chromium 6 months ----
Cobalt 6 months -----
Copper 6 months -----
pichloromeLhane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days --8.4 days -
Field pH (S.D.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days -----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months --8.4 days -
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months -8.4 days --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months --8.4 days --
Iron 6 months ------
Lab pH (S.U.) ------
Lead 6 months -----
Manganese 6 months ------
Mercury 28 days ------
Molybdenum 6 months ------
Naphthalene 14 days --8.4 d<tY§ -
Nickel 6 months -----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days -2.3 days 2.2 days
Selenium 6 months ----6.3 days
Silver 6 months ------
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days ---
TDS (mgfL) 7 days --5.1 days --
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days ----
Thallium 6 months -----
Tin 6 months ----
Toluene 14 days -8.4 days --
Uranium 6 months 2.3 days 2.4 days -
Vanadium 6 months -----
Xylenes (total) 14 days --8.4 day_s -
Zinc 6 months ----
AlC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W --------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ----
Calcium 6 months ----
Carbonate as C03 14 days ------
Cations BALANCE-W --------
Magnesium 6 months ----
Potassium 6 months ------
Sodium 6 months -----
G-2B: Holding Time Evaluation -Accelerated samples
QAPHolding
Constituent Time MW-319/6/2011 MW-35917/2011
2-Butanone (MEK) 14 dl!)'s ----
Acetone 14 days ---
Ammonia (as N) 28 days ----
Arsenic 6 months ---
Benzene 14 days --
Beryllium 6 months ---
Cadmium 6 months ---
Carbon Tetrachloride 14 dl!)'s ----
Chloride (mg/L) 28 days 21 days --
Chloroform 14 days ---
Chloromethane 14 days ----
Chromium 6 months ---
Cobalt 6 months ---
Copper 6 months --
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 14 days ---
Field pH (S.U.) Immediate
Fluoride (Mg/L) 28 days ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 6 months ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 6 months --
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 6 months ---
Iron 6 months ---
Lab pH (S.U.) -----
Lead 6 months ---
Manganese 6 months --2.3 days
Mercury 28 days ---
Molybdenum 6 months --
Naphthalene 14 days ---
Nickel 6 months ----
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 28 days 3.1 days ,-
Selenium 6 months ----
Silver 6 months ---
Sulfate (mg/L) 28 days 10 days --
TDS (mglL) 7 days 5.9 days -
Tetrahydrofuran 14 days --
Thallium 6 months ---
Tin 6 months ---
Toluene 14 days ---
Uranium 6 months --2.3 days
Vanadium 6 months ----
Xylenes (total) 14 days ----'
Zinc 6 months ----
NC Balance (± 5) BALANCE-W ------
Anions BALANCE-W ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 14 days ----
Calcium 6 months ---
Carbonate as C03 14 days ---
Cations BALANCE-W -----
Magnesium 6 months --
Potassium 6 months ----
Sodium 6 months ---
G-3A: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
Sumple Dutch Wells in Butch Temperature
2.3 °C
AWAL -I IOS IOS MW-I I, MW·14, MW-25 , MW-26,
MW-30. MW-3 1, MW·35, MW-65
2.9 °C
EL · CII 080529 MW-2. MW-3. MW-3A, MW·5, MW·
12, MW-1S, MW-27. MW-28, MW-
29. MW-36. MW·37. MW·70
MW-24, MW-32, MW-I I. MW-14, 4.2°C
EL· Cl 1080269 MW-25, MW·26, MW·30, MW·31,
MW-35, MW-65
EL · Cl 1090045 MW-14, MW·32, MW·65. MW-25, 2.3"C
MW-26. MW-35
EL · CllQ909 14 MW-IS. MW-70 2.4°C
G-3B: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check -Accelerated Samples
Sample Batch Wells in Batch Temperature
AWAL -1107136 MW-li 4.4 °C
AWAL-1109163 MW-II 4°C
~W-l1,~-25,~-26,~W-30,~-3.2°C
EL -Cl 1070274 31,~-65
EL -C 11070824 MW-35 2.6 °C
~W-ll,~-25,~-26,~W-30,~-2.2°C
EL -C1I090325 31, MW-35, MW-65
G-4A: Analytical Method Check
Parameter QAPMethod Method Used by Lab
Ammonia (as N) A4500-NH3 G A4500-NH3 G
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) E353.2 E353.2
Metals except Iron E200.8 E200.8
Iron E200.7 E200.7
Gross Alpha E900.1 E9OO.1
VOCs except Tetrahvdrofuran SW8260B SW8260B
Tetrahydrofuran SW8260C SW8260C
Chloride A4500-CIB A4500-CI B
Fluoride A4500-FC A4500-FC
Sulfate A4500-S04 E A4500-S04 E
TDS A2540C A2540C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as He03 A2320B A2320B
Calcium. Magnesium. Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
Telrahydrofuran was analyzed by American West AnaJytical Laboratories. All other constituents were analyzed by Energy Laboratories.
040; Analytical Method OKck -Aca:ler:ued Samples
"
I ,
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW~2 MW-3
8/8/2011 8/10/2011
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 J,tg/L ------
Acetone 20 j.lg/L -------
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg!L --------
Arsenic 5 J,tg/L --------
Benzene 1.0 !lg/L --------
Beryllium 0.50 !lg/L ------
Cadmium 0.50 !lg/L -------
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0J!gIL --------
Ch loride (mg/L) 1 mg/L -------
Chloroform 1.0 !lg/L --------
Chloromethane 1.0 !lg/L -------
Chromium 25 ug/L -------
Cobalt 10 !lg/L -------
Copper 10 J,tg/L --------
Dichloromelhane (Methylene Chloride) 1.0 !lg/L -------
Fluoride (Mg/L) O.L mg/L ----0.1 mg/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 1.0 pCi/L o pCi/L -
Iron 30 J,tg/L ------
Lead 1.0 !Lg/L -- ------
Manganese 10 !lgIL .-----
Mercury 0.50 !lg/L ------
Molybdenum 10 !lg/L --------
N~hthalene 1.0 !lg/L -------
Nickel 20 !lg/L ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.1 mg/L ------
Selenium 5 !lg/L --5 ug/L
Silver 10 !lg/L ------
Sulfate (mgIL) 1 mg/L ------
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L -----
Tetrahydrofuran 1.0 !lg/L -----
Thallium 0.50 !lg/L -------
Tin 100 J,tg/L -----
Toluene 1.0 !lg/L ------
Uranium 0.30 !lg/L -------
Vanadium 15 I-Lg/L ------
XyIenes (total) 1.0 ~lg/L --------
Zinc 10 J,tg/L -------
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mg/L -------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L -------
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L -----
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L -' .. ---
Potassium 0.5 mg/L -------
Sodium 0.5 mg/L --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-3A MW-5 MW-11
8/11/2011 8/912011 8/3/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ------20 ug/L U
Acetone -----20 ug/L U
Ammonia (as N) ------0.05 mg/L
Arsenic ----5 ug/L U
Benzene -----1 ugIL U
Beryllium --------0.5 ug/L U
Cadmium ------0.5 ug/L U
Carbon Tetrachloride ------I ugIL U
Chloride CmglL) -------1 mg/L
Chloroform -------I ug/L U
Chloromethane --------1 ugIL U
Chromium --------25 ug/L U
Cobalt -------10 ug/L U
Copper --------10 ug/L U
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------I ug/L U
Fluoride (Mg/L) --------0.1 mg/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC ---o pCiIL
Iron --------30 ug/L
Lead --------I ug/L U
Manganese -------10 ug/L
Mercury -------0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum --------10 ug/L U
Naphthalene -------1 ug/L U
Nickel -------20 ug/L U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) --------0.1 mg/L U
Selenium 5 ug/L ----5 ugIL U
Silver -------10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mg/L) 50 mg/L 0 ----20 mg/L 0
TOS (mg/L) 17 mg/L D ----10 mg/L
Tetrahydrofuran -----1 [lg/L
Thallium ------O.5ugIL U
Tin -----100 ug/L U
Toluene ------I ug/L U
Uranium ---0.3 ug/L 0.3 ug/L
Vanadium -------15 ug/L U
Xylenes (total) -----1 ug/L U
Zinc ------10 ug/L U
Bicarbonate as HC03 -----1 mg/L
Calcium ------0.6 mg/L D
Carbonate as C03 -------I mg/L
Magnesium --------0.5 mg/L
Potassium -------0.5 mg/L
Sodium -----0.9 mg/L D
G-5A: Routine Reponing Limit Check
MW-12 MW-14 MW-14
4/5/2011 8/3/2011 8/30/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ----20 ug/L U ----
AceLone ---20 ug/L U ---
Ammonia (as N) --------0.1 mg/L U
Arsenic -------5 ug/L U
Benzene --1 ug/L U ---
Beryllium ------0.5 ug/L U
Cadmium --------0.5 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride ---1 ug/L U ----
Chloride (mglL) ----I mg/L ----
Chloroform --1 ug/L U ----
Chloromethane --1 ug/L U --
Chromium --------25 ug/L U
Cobalt ------10 ug/L U
Copper -------10 ug/L U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ----I ug/L U ----
Fluoride (MglL) ----0.1 mg/L ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC ----o pCi/L
Iron --------30 ug/L U
Lead ------1 ug/L U
Manganese -------10 ug/L
Mercury -----0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum --------10 ug/L U
Naphthalene ----I ug/L U --
Nickel -----20 ug/L U
Nit.rate + Nitrite (as N) ------0.1 mg/L U
Selenium 5u~ ---5 ug/L U
Silver -------10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mgfL) ----50 mg/L D --;-
TDS (mg/L) ----10 mg/L --
Tetrahydrofuran ---I /Lg/L ---
Thallium ------0.5 ug/L U
Tin -------100 ug/L U
Toluene --1 ug/L U ----
Uranium -------0.3 ug/L
Vanadium ------15u~ U
XyJenes (total) ---I ug/L U ---
Zinc -------10 ug/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 ----I mg/L ----
Calcium ------0.5 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 --1 mg/L U ---
Magnesium ------0.5 mg/L
Potassium -------0.5 mg/L
Sodium ------0.5 mg/L
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-18 MW-18 MW-19
8/10/2011 9/21/2011 7/20/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ---------
Acetone -----------
Ammonia (as N) ----------
Arsenic -------.--
Benzene ----------
Beryllium ---------
Cadmium ----------
Carbon Tetrachloride ----------
Chloride (mg/L) ----------
Chloroform ----------
Chloromethane -----------
Chromium ------------
Cobalt ----------
Copper ------------
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ----------
Fluoride (MgIL) ---------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC -----
Iron -----------
Lead -----------
Manganese ---------
Mercury ----------
Molybdenum ---------
Naphthalene -----------
Nickel ----------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) ---------
Selenium ---------
Silver ---------
Sulfate (mglL) 50 mg/L D -------
TOS (mgIL) 10 mg/L --------
Tetrahydrofuran --------
Thallium 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L --
Tin ---------
Toluene ------------
Uranium ---------
Vanadium ----------
Xylenes (total) ---------
Zinc ----------
Bicarbonate as HC03 ---------
Calcium ---------
Carbonate as C03 ----------
Magnesium -----------
Potassium ---------
Sodium ---------
G-SA: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-23 MW-24 MW-2S
8/4/2011 8/4/2011 8/3/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ------20 ug/L U
Acetone ------20 ug/L U
Ammonia (as N) -------0.1 mg/L 0
Arsenic -----------
Benzene -------I ug/L U
Beryllium ---- -----
Cadmium ---0.5 ug/L 0 ---
Carbon Tetrachloride -------1 ug/L U
Chloride (mg/L) ------1 mg/L 0
Chloroform ----- --I ug/L U
Chloromethane --------J ug/L U
Chromium ---------
Cobalt ---------
Copper ----------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------J ug/L U
Fluoride (Mg/L) -------0.1 mg/L 0
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC -----
Iron -----------
Lead ----------
Manganese -----------
Mercury ----------
Molybdenum ----------
Naphthalene -------J ug/L U
Nickel -----------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) -------0.1 mg/L U
Selenium ----------
Silver ------------
Sulfate (mg/L) -------50 mg/L D
TDS (mg/L) ------10 mg/L 0
Tetrahydrofuran ------J /-tgIL
Thallium ---0.5 ug/L U --
Tin --------
Toluene --------I ug/L U
Uranium ----------
Vanadium ----------
Xylenes (total) ------1 ug/L U
Zinc ---------
Bicarbonate as HC03 --------I mg/L 0
Calcium ---------
Carbonate as C03 -------1 mgIL U
Magnesium ------------
Potassium --'. ------
Sodium --------
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-25 MW-26 MW-26
8/30/2011 8/3/2011 8/30/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ----20 ug/L U --
Acetone ----20 ug/L U ---
Ammonia (as N) ----0.05 mg/L 0 --
Arsenic 5 ug/L U --5 ug/L U
Benzene ----I ug/L U --
Beryllium 0.5 ug/L U ---0.5 ug/L U
Cadmium 0.5 ug/L 0 ---0.5 ug/L U
Carbon Tetrachloride ----I ug/L U ----
Chloride (mg/L) ---I mg/L 0 ---
Chloroform ---100 ug/L D ----
Chloromethane ---1 ug/L U ---
Chromium 25 ug/L U --.-25 ug/L U
Cobalt 10 ug/L U ---10 ug/L U
Copper 10 ug/L U ---10 ug/L U
Di.chloromelhane (Methylene Chloride) ---I ug/L 0 ----
Fluoride (MgIL) ---0.1 mg/L 0 ----
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC o pCiIL --o pCi/L
Iron 30 ug/L U ----3D ug/L 0
Lead 1 ug/L U ----I ug/L U
Manganese 10 ug/L 0 ---10 ug/L 0
Mercury 0.5 ug/L U ----0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum 10 ugIL 0 ----10 ug/L U
Naphthalene ---I ug/L U ----
Nickel 20 ug/L U ----20 ug/L U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) ---0.1 mg/L 0 ----
Selenium 5 ug/L U ---5 ug/L U
Silver 10 ug/L U ----10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mg/L) --50 mg/L D ----
TDS (mg/L) ---10 mg/L 0 ---
Tetrahydrofuran ----I Jlg/L ---
Thallium 0.5 ug/L 0 ---0.5 ug/L U
Tin 100 ug/L U ----100 ug/L U
Toluene ---I ug/L U ---
Uranium 0.3 ug/L 0 ----0.3 ug/L 0
Vanadium 15 ug/L U ----IS ug/L U
Xylenes (total) ---I ug/L U ---
Zinc 10 ugIL U ----10 ug/L U
Bicarbonate as RC03 ---I mg/L 0 ----
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0 ---0.5 mg/L 0
Carbonate as C03 ----I mg/L U --
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0 ----0.5 mg/L 0
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0 --0.5 mg/L 0
Sodium 0.5 mgIL 0 ----0.5 mgIL 0
G-5A Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-27 MW-28 MW-29
8/8/2011 8/8/2011 8/9/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ----------
Acetone ----------
Ammonia (as N) ----------
Arsenic ---------
Benzene ----------
Beryllium -------
Cadmium -----------
Carbon Tetrachloride ---------
Chloride (11!g/L) 1 mgt!. 0 1 mglL ---
Chloroform ----------
Chloromethane --------
Chromium --------
Cobalt ----------
Copper ---------
Dichloromethane (Melhylene Chloride) ----------
Fluoride (MglL) ----------
Gross AjQha minus Rn & U MDC o pC ilL --
Iron ------30 ugIL
Lead ------------
Manganese -----------
Mercury -----------
Molybdenum -----------
Naphthalene ----------
Nickel ------------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.2mglL D -------
Selenium -----------
Silver --------
Sulfate (mg/L) 10 mglL D --------
TDS (mglL) 10 mglL 0 ------
Tetrahydrofuran ----------
Thallium -----------
Tin ---------
Toluene -----------
Uranium ---------
Vanadium -----------
Xylenes (total) ---------
Zinc ----------
Bicarbonate as RC03 -----------
Calcium --------
Carbonate as C03 ---------
Magnesium --------
Potassium -----------
Sodium -----------
G-5A: Routine Reporling Limit Check
MW-30 MW-31 MW-32
8/3/2011 8/2/2011 8/2/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U --
Acetone 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U ----
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mg/L U 0.05 mg/L U ---
Arsenic 5 ug/L U 5 ug/L U ---
Benzene 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U ----
Beryllium 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U ----
Cadmium 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U ---
Carbon Tetrachloride I ug/L U 1 ug/L U ---
Chloride Cmg/L) 1 mg/L 1 mg/L ---
Chloroform 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U --
Chloromethane 1 uglI,. U 1 ug/L U ---
Chromium 25 ug/L U 25 ug/L U --
Cobalt 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U ---
Copper 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U ---
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U ---
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L 0.1 mg/L ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC o pCi/L o pCi/L ---
Iron 30 ug/L 30 ug/L U ----
Lead 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U ----
Manganese 10 ug/L 10 ug/L U ---
Mercury 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U ---
Molybdenum 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U ----
Naphthalene 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U ----
Nickel 20 ugIL U 20 ugIL U ---
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L D 1 mg/L D ---
Selenium 5 ug/L 5 ug/L ---
Silver 10 ug/L U 10 ugIL U ----
Sulfate CmgIL) 20 mg/L D 10 mg/L D ---
TDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L 10 mg/L ----
Tetrahydrofuran 1 Ilg/L 1 Ilg/L ---
Thallium 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ugIL U ---
Tin 100 ug/L U 100 ug/L U ---
Toluene 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U ----
Uranium 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ug/L ----
Vanadium 15 ug/L U 15 ug/L U ----
Xylenes (total) 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U ---
Zinc 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U ----
Bicarbonate as RC03 1 mg/L 5 PERCENT ---
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L --
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L U 5 PERCENT U ---
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L ----
Sodium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mg/L ----
G-5A: Routine Reporting Limit Check
MW-32 MW-35 MW-35
8/30/2011 8/2/2011 8/30/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ---------
Acetone --------
Ammonia (as N) -------
Arsenic 5ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L U 5 ug/L U
Benzene --------
Beryllium 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Cadmium 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Carbon Tetrachloride ----------
Chloride (mg/L) --------
Chloroform --------
Chloromethane ---------
Chromium 25 ug/L 25 ug/L 25 ug/L U 25 ug/L U
Cobalt 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Copper 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Oichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ----------
Fluoride (Mg/L) ------------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC o pCi/L o pCi/L o pCi/L o pCi/L
Iron 30 ugIL 30 ug/L 30 ug/L 30 ug/L
Lead 1 ug/L 1 ug/L 1 ug/L U 1 ug/L U
Manganese 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L
Mercury 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L U 0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Naphthalene ----------
Nickel 20 ug/L 20 ug/L 20 ug/L U 20 ug/L U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) ----------
Selenium 5 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L 5 ug/L
Silver 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mg/L) ----------
TDS (mg/L) ---------
Tetrahydrofuran -----------
Thallium 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L 0.5 ug/L
Tin 100 ug/L lOO ug/L 100 ug/L U 100 ug/L U
Toluene ----------
Uranium 0.3 ugIL 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ug/L 0.3 ug/L
Vanadium 15 ug/L 15 ug/L 15 ug/L U 15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) --------
Zinc 10 ug/L 10 ug/L 10 ug/L U 10 ug/L U
Bicarbonate as HC03 -----------
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 ----------
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Potassium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mg/L
G-5A: Routine Rcporling Limit Check
MW-65 MW-65
8/3/2011 8/30/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20 ug/L U ---
Acetone 20 ug/L U --
Ammonia (as N) 0.05 mgIL --
Arsenic ---5 ug/L U
Benzene 1 ug/L U --
Beryllium ---0.5 ug/l U
Cadmium ----0.5 ug/L U
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 ug/L U ---
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L ----
Chloroform 50 ug/L D ----
Chloromethane 1 ug/L U ----
Chromium ----25 ug/L U
Cobalt ----10 ug/L U
Copper ----10 ug/L
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1 ug/L ----
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.1 mg/L ---
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC -o pCi/L
Iron ----30 ugIL
Lead ----I ug/L U
Manganese ---10 ug/L
Mercury ---0.5 ug/L U
Molybdenum ----10 ug/L U
Naphthalene 1 ug/L U ---
Nickel ---20 ug/L U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) O.lm~ ----
Selenium ---5 ug/L U
Silver ----10 ug/L U
Sulfate (mg/L) 50 mg/L D --
IDS (mg/L) 10 mg/L ---
Tetrahydrofuran l/Aog/L --
Thallium --0.5 ug/L U
Tin ---100 ug/L U
Toluene 1 ug/L U ---
Uranium --0.3 ug/L
Vanadium --15 ugIL U
Xylenes (total) 1 ug/L U -,---
Zinc --10 ug/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 1 mgIL ---
Calcium ---0.5 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 1 mg/L U ---
Magnesium ---0.5 mg/L
Potassium ---0.5 mgIL
Sodium ---0.5 mg/L
G-5A: Routine Reporling Limit Check
MW-70 MW-70
8/10/2011 9/2112011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) -------
Acetone -------
Ammonia (as N) -----
Arsenic ------
Benzene ------
BeryJlium ------
Cadmium --------
Carbon Tetrachloride -------
Chloride (mglL) -----
Chloroform ------
Chloromethane ------
Chromium ------
Cobalt -----
Copper -----
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ------
Fluoride (MglL) ------
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC ----
Iron -------
Lead -------
Manganese -------
Mercury -------
Molybdenum -----
Naphthalene -------
Nickel ------
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) -------
Selenium ----._--
Silver -------
Sulfate (mglL) 50 mglL D ---
TDS (mglL) 10 mglL ---
Tetrahydrofuran -------
Thallium ----0.5 uglL
Tin -------
Toluene -------
Uranium --------
Vanadium --------
Xylenes (lotal) --------
Zinc ------
Bicarbonate as HC03 -------
Calcium -------
Carbonate as C03 -----
Magnesium -------
Potassium ---- ---
Sodium ------
5 G-B: Accelerated ReptJrting Limit Check
MW·1l7/6/2011 MW-147/5/2011
QAP Reporting
Constituent Limit RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) 20j.lg/L ~ ~ -..
Acctone 20 j.lg/L -~ ---
Benzene 1.01!g/L ~ -~ ..
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 1!g!L ----.-
Chloride (mg/L) 1 mg/L --~ .-
Chloroform 1.0l!i!IL ---~ .-
Chloromethane 1.01!g/L -----
Dicbloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 1.01!g/L -.---
Field pH (S.U.) 0.01 s.u. --.-~ -
Manganese 10 I!g/L 10 ug/l ----.
Naphthnlene 1.01!g/l --. ---
Nitrnte + Nitrite (ns N) 0.1 mg/L -----
Selenium 51!g/L ---,---
Sulfate (mg/l) I me/L -----
TDS (m!1/L) 10 mg/L -----
TClraJlydrofurnll 1.01!g/L I ~g/L ---
Toluene 1.0J,lglL -----.-
Uranium 0,30 J,lJ!/L ------
Xvlenes (total) 1.0J,lg/L -----
G-SB: Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
MW-25716/2011 MW-2671612011 MW-30 715/2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ---20 W!tr U --
Acclone ---20 uj!/L U --
Benzene ---I tij;)i U --
Carbon Tetrachloride ---I ug/l U ---
Chloride Cmg/L) ---I mg/l 1 mg/l 0
Chloroform --100ug!L D ---
Chioromelhllll6 --1 ugtL U ---
Dichloromethane (Methvlene Chloride) --lul!lL ---
Field pH (S.U.) ----
Manganese ---- --
Naphthalene - -1 tij;)i U --
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) --0.1 mg/l 1 mg/l D
Selenium ----Sul!lL 0
Sulfale (mglL) -------
TDS (mWL) --10 mgJl ---
Tetrahydrofuran -------
Toluene --lul!lL U ---
Uranium 0.3 ug/l 0 0.3 uii/L ---
Xylenes (total) --1 Uii7i U ---
G5B A -: eee erate dR eporl.lOll L· . Ch k lImt ec
MW-317/S/2011 MW-3S 7/20/2011 MW·l1 9nt2011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone CMEK) --------
Acetone -------
Benzene --.-----
Carbon Tetrachloride ------
Chloride Cmg/L) 1 rilg!l 0 ----
Chlornfonn ------
Chloromethane ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) --------
Field pH (S.U.) -------
Manganese ---lOuj!/L 0 lOuWl
Naohthalene ---------
Nitrate + Nitrite (ns N) 1 mgIL D -----
Selenium --------
Sulfate CmWl) lOmg/L D ----
TDS (mgIL) lOmg& 0 ----
Tetrahydrofuran -----Iltg/L
Toluene -- ----
Uranium --0.3 uJVl 0 --.
Xylenes (total) -------
G-SB· Accelerated Reporting Limit Check
MW-149/8/2011 MW-2S 91712011 MW-2691712011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) ----20 ug/L U
Acetone ----20 ug/L U
Benzene ----I ul!/I. U
Carbon Tetrachloride ----lug/L U
Chloride (mglL) --,---I mg/L 0
Chl orofonll ----100 ug/L 0
Chloromethane ----I ul!/I. U
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ----lug/L 0
Field pH (S.U.) --
Manganese -------
Naphthalene ----I ugIL U
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) ----0.2ml!/I. 0
Selenium ------
Sulfa te (mg/L) -------
TDS (mg/L) ----10 mglL 0
Tetrahydrofuran ------
Toluene ----1 ug/L U
Uranium ---O.3ugIL 0 0.3 ugIL 0
Xylenes (total) ----1 ugfL U
0-5B: Acce erated ReJ>()11ingLimit Check
MW-30 91712011 MW-3191612011 MW-3591612011
Constituent RL Qualifier RL Qualifier RL Qualifier
2-Butanone (MEK) -------.
Acetone ------
Benzene --_. ----
Carbon Tetrachloride -----.-
Chloride (mgIL) 1 mJ!!L 0 1 mj!/L 0 --
Chloroform --.----
Chloromethane ------
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) ------
Field pH (S.U.)
Manganese -----10 ugIL 0
Naphthalene -----_.
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 1 mg/L D 1 mJ!!L 0 --
Selenium 5ug/L 0 -----
Sulfate (mg/L) --10mg/L 0 --
TDS CmwL) --lOmg/l 0 --
Tetrahydrofuran -------
Toluene --.----
Uranium ----0.3 ugIL 0
Xylenes (lotal) ------
G·6A: Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blanks for the 20 II Third Quarter sampl es were nondctcct.
0-6B: Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blanks ror the Accelerated 20 11 Third Quarter samples were non detect.
Blank Sample Date Laboratory
I 7/6I2011 Energy Laboratories
2 7/6nO I I American West Analytical Laboratories
3 9nnOll Energy Laboratories
4 9nJ2011 American West Analytical Laboratori es
G-7 A: QNQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates
Constituent MW·26
Ammonia (ns N) 0.27
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.6
Iron 1280
Manganese 984
Uranium 19
Chloroform 1000
Dichloromclhane (MethyLene Chloride) 10
Chloride (m'4lL) 60
Field pH (S.U.) 6.07
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.27
Lab pH (S.U.) 7.72
Sulfate (mg/L) 1950
IDS (mgIL) 3190
Bicarbonate as HC03 397
Calcium 482
Carbonate as C03 0
Cations BALANCE-W 47.1
Magnesium 159
Potassium 10.7
Sodium 222
RadiologicDuplicale Tests
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Gross A~ha minus Rn & U*
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Constituent
Thallium
Field pH (S.U.)
TDS (mg/L)
Sulfate (mg/L)
¥ Duplicate checks reported for gross alpha mInus RN and
U are not %RPD. Calculated values are based on the
formula in the approved QAP.
0.2
2.7
0.4
MW·18
3.39
5.95
3190
1910
MW·65 %RPD
0.27 0.00
0.6 0.00
1210 5.62
971 1.33
28.2 38.98
1100 9.52
12 18.18
57 5.13
6.07 0.00
0.26 3.77
7.74 0.26
1950 0.00
3180 0.31
389 2.04
493 -2.26
0 0.00
47.3 -0.42
159 0.00
10.6 0.94
214 3.67
0.2 0.00
2.5 0.354
0.4
MW·70 %RPD
3.47 2.33
5.95 0.00
3220 -0.94
1910 0.00
G-7B: QAJQC Evaluation for Accelerated Sample Duplicates
MW-31 MW-65
Constituent 7/5/2011 7/5/2011 %RPD
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 22 21 4.65
Chloride (mgIL) 148 145 2.05
Field QH (S.U.) 6.64 6.64 0.00
Sulfate (mg/L) 532 536 0.75
TDS(mg/L) 1280 1300 -1.55
MW-35 MW-65
Constituent 91712011 91712011 %RPD
Manganese 270 275 1.83
Uranium 22.3 23 3.09
FieldlJH (S.U.) 6.47 6.47 0.00
G-8A: Radiologics Counting Error
Gross Alpha Counting
Gross Alpha minusRn&U Error S Within
Well Sample Date minusRn &U Precision (±) 20% GWCL GWCL?
MW-2 8/8/2011 0.5 0.1 Y 3.2 Y
MW-11 8/312011 1.1 0.7 N 3.75 Y
MW-14 8/30/2011 0.5 0.2 N 7.5 Y
MW-25 8/30/2011 0.6 0.2 N 7.5 Y
MW-26 8/30/2011 2.7 0.4 Y 4.69 Y
MW-27 8/8/2011 0.8 0.2 N 2 Y
MW-30 8/3/2011 1.1 0.7 N 3.75 Y
MW-31 812/2011 0.5 0.6 N 7.5 Y
MW-32 8/30/2011 1.9 0.3 Y 3.33 Y
MW-35 8/30/2011 4.5 0.5 Y 3.75 NA
MW-36 8/9/2011 0.3 0.1 N No GWCLs have been set MW-37 8/1112011 0.6 0.1 Y
MW-65 8/30/2011 2.5 0.4 Y 4.69 Y
N/A -the counting error is less than 20% of the activity as required by the GWDP. The value is above the GWCL and
this check column is not applicable.
G-8B= Radiologies Counting Error for Accelerated Samples
Gross Alpha Counting
Gross AJpha minos Rn & U Error !':
Well Sample Date minus Rn & U Precision (±) 20% GWCL
MW-26 7/6nOLl 2.8 0.4 Y 4.69
MW-26 9171201 I 2.5 0.4 Y 4.69
G-9A: Laboratory Matrix QC
M t' S 'k 9l R C a rIX 'PI C () ecovery omparlSon
MSD
Lab Report Well Analyte MS %REC %REC REC Range RPD
Cll080269 MW-65 Silver 64 71 70 -130 9.7
C11080269 MW-65 Manganese* NC NC 70 -130 NC
C11080269 MW-32 Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 71 67 70 -130 4.4
C11080529 NA Naphthalene 82 103 70 -130 23
Cll090045 MW-32 Manganese* NC NC 70 -130 NC
Cll090045 MW-32 Silver 74 57 70 -130 26
CI1090045 MW-65 Manganese* NC NC 70 -130 NC
C11090045 NA Manganese* NC NC 70 -130 NC
CI1090045 NA Manganese* NC NC 70 -130 NC
NA = MS samples were not Demson samples.
*= Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike level.
S 9l R urrogate () ccovery
Lab
Specified
Surrogate REC QAP Required
Lab Report WeWSample Analyte %REC Range Range
Cll080529 MW-36 p-Bromofluorobenzene 126 80-120 None
C11080529 MW-37 Q-Bromofluorobenzene 129 80-120 None
CI1080529 Trip Blank p-Bromofluorobenzene 122 80-120 None
Method Blank detections
QAP
Reported Required
Lab Report WelVSample Analyte Concentration RL
Cll080269 NA Bicarbonate as HC03 2.46 mglL 1 mglL
G-9B: ACCelerated Laboratory Matrix QC
RECRange RPD%
70 -130 0.2
Method Blank Detections
Reported QAP Required
Lab Report WclUSumplc Analylc ConcentratIon RL
Cl1070274 -July Accelerated NA Selenium 0.4 ug/L 5 ug/L
TabH
Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
o
MW-22
.5450
TW4-1
0 5554
PIEZ-1
'" 5594
TWN-4
~5603
MW-34
-¢-5492
MW-36 3::t 5493
f
;1 II
II
II
" 11
II
,I
I' II
II
-:? -?-
11 32 ,I
II
II
II
I' II ,I
II
,I
II
• MVY-21
N
\1
II
\\ ~ ~ \;;
~ ~ ~
MW-02
e5503
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
MW-03 e5471
~s.;80
MW-20
.5453
~
MW-01
.5583
MW-18
e5587
TWN-11 TWN-1iJ/ttf:9 ~561 ~ ~16/
'\. '\.. ~Q7-~
~5586
TWN-10
'\.
~584
lWN-9
" "
PIEZ-1---r.:j.
P
~5594
"-
PI~-2 ~61 1
./ .....
'\
\
/
p .!-':=::====
_ 552
" ~ ~
L...
~
\
~ --=.-=. "'~-=.-=.-~, ~~~~--~----~----~~ 4 --------~~---
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATION
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well installed
August/September, 2010
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well installed April,
2011 showing elevation in feet amsl
3000
~~ ~~
MW-22 " II
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC.
e5450 ".# .#
.~
.#
.#
//
.#
.#
.#
.#
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are pumping wells
KRIGED 3rd QUARTER, 2011 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
APPROVED DATE REFERENCE FIGURE
SJS H:/718000/nov11 /wI0911 .srf H-l
Tab I
Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
~ -.. .§. ..
"tI .;:
0 :;: u
~ -.. .§. .. ~ 0 :J ;::;:
Time concentration plots for MW-1
Chloride in MW-l
25 .'r------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,
15
10
5
0.6
0.5
0.4
0,3
0.2
0.1
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-l
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::; .. .§.
111 .... :jg
:::I III
::; ~
E :::I ·c
I! ::J
Time concentration plots for MW·1
Sulfate in MW-l
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
a
~ .... ,.<:<
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-l
12 ~--------------------------------------------------------~
10 t-.-------------------------------------------------------~
8
6
4
2
i' C!
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
:::;
"Oa !.
QI 'U .1:
..5! .c u
:::;
"Oa !.
QI ~ 0 :J Li:
Time concentration plots for MW-2
Chloride in MW-2
25
20
15
10
5
o +---~-----r----~----~--~----~----~--~~--~
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
w\
-I
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
,y ..... ",
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-2
J
/
A I
~ o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
~ AA. J ...
V
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
2500
2000
:::;-1500 .. .§.
! ::I III 1000
Time concentration plots for MW-2
Sulfate in MW-2
500 t-------------------------------------------------------------I
o
20
18
16
14
:::;-12 l
~
E 10 ::I 'c ~ 8 ;:)
6
4
2
A
If \
~ a
"OJ r:F
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-2
l
"-~ \
~ ~
\ /
'/ V
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
~
"-k ~ \J
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
:::i' 50
"Oll .§.
cu 40 !! 0 :c u 30
20
10
0
~'b~ ,.-;
1
0.8
:::i'
"Oll .§.
cu 0.6 ..,
'1: 0 ::I ;;:
0.4
0.2
'b'" <f ~'"
Time concentration plots for MW-3
""~ ~'>
Chloride in MW-3
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-3
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
4500
4000
3500
3000
::i Cia 2500 .§.
!'J £ 2000 ::. III
1500
1000
500
0
'Jf'
\",<:,
80
70
60
::i 50
~
E 40 :I ·2 1! ::I 30
20
10
0
(f'lOJ
0
Time concentration plots for MW-3
Sulfate in MW-3
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-3
!o (f'8 o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
"F?$ WE
Intc~A
:=oo..~Ja!
::.-Iia oS
GI ~ 0 :E u
::.-Iia oS
GI :!! ::;
:::I u::
ao
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
j' ,.;$
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
o.a
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
~..,
.,,>('
.. .I
s§:>
,<Q
Time concentration plots for MW-3A
Chloride in MW-3A
/ ~ ~~"'(
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-3A
/ ~ .,,><:'
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::J Iia .§. .. .. ~ " III
::J -~
E " 'c ~ :::)
Time concentration plots for MW-3A
Sulfate in MW-3A
3900 ,----------------------------------.
3800
3700
3600
3500
3400
3300
3200
5:J'" ,>",,,,
30
25
20
15
10
5
o
d> I' .. 01 ~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-3A
" /"-.......
""\
" ....
"Y'
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Va lues
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
:::;-50
~ .§.
QI 40 ~ 0 :c u 30
20
10
0
"r@ ~:. c:<C> 0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
:::;-
'bD 1 .§.
QI
"a .~ 0.8
'" u: r 0.6 It
0.4
0.2
o
~~e,,---=
Ini:c~A
~ !:iJ;;
Time concentration plots for MW-5
ii-~:~
Chloride in MW-S
!Ill;)
<l-q !t ,<V1
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-S
A
/ --h
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
,fit
1'~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::;-
Iia .E-
OJ .... ~ ::J VI
::;-~
E ::J ·c ~ :l
Time concentration plots for MW-S
Sulfate in MW-S
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
",'Of!l &'0'" ~~ IitcfJ !'P'
~'1> 0 ~'1> '" ,,,If
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-S
4
3.5
2.5
2
1.5 J
-r -1
0.5 !J ~ f , ~ ., b ~ , \.... ,
~
0
.. ~ I:J I I
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
\rF \J V
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::;-
Iii! !.
III :E ~ :E \.I
::;-
Iii! !.
III "1:1 .~
:::I ;;;:
Time concentration plots for MW-11
Chloride in MW-ll
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
o +------r----~~----~----~----~------~----~----~----____
0,8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 i
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-ll
i i i i ,
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
U
~I ~. .,
i ,
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
1400
1200
1000
:;;
iia 800
.§. ., .. ~ 600 '" III
400
200
0
'1>'" {p <f ,<q1 Q'"
3.5
3
2.5
:;;
] 2
E '" 'c 1.5 f! :)
0.5 ~
~
Time concentration plots for MW-11
n
I
Sulfate in MW-ll
t:<C' ~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-ll
IJ \
l~ 1 "-, ~ lJ
J,
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
---'"
..
,~
W
• Detected Va lues
• Non-Detected Values
160
140
120
:::.-100
10 .§. .. 80 "lJ .;:
0 :E u 60
40
20
a
;:l:.'bo,
~.,
0.4
0.35
0.3
:::.-0.25
10 .§. .. 0.2 :E a :::I il: 0.15
0.1
0.05
"cff' \"
Time concentration plots for MW-12
Chloride in MW-12
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-12
~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
J' .A J ~ ,
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
~ .. .§. .. .. ~ ::J III
~ ..... .!
E ::J 'c E ::I
Time concentration plots for MW-12
Sulfate in MW-12
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
a +-----~----~------~----~----_r----~------r_----~-----I
",'b'"
~'1>
20
15
10
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-12
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
30
25
20
~ "iia .§.
OJ "1:1 .;:
0 :E u
10
5
0.2
~ 0.15 "iia .§.
OJ "1:1 .~
:I 0.1 ;:;:
0.05
Time concentration plots for MW-14
Chloride in MW-14
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-14
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::; -.. .§.
III .... ~ :::I III
::;
~
E :::I ';: ~ ::J
Time concentration plots for MW-14
Sulfate in MW-14
2500 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
2000
1500
1000
500 +-------------------------------------------------------------1
120
100
80
60
40
20
o
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-14
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::;
'b:a .§. .. -a .;:
0 :E u
::; .... ... .§. .. :!! Q
" il:
Time concentration plots for MW-1S
Chloride in MW-1S
60
50
40
30
20
10
o ~-----r----~------T------r----~------~----~----~----~
0.4
0.35
0.3 ,..-
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-1S
~ ~ ..... \ -..,
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
\. .-.-..
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::r 'ii)
.§. .. .. J! ~ 11\
::r }
E ,.
';: ~ ::I
Time concentration plots for MW·15
Sulfate in MW-1S
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-1S
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
o +-----~----r-----r-----~--_.r_--~----_.----~----~
,p,*,OJ
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
60
50
40
::; Iia .§. .. 30 "g .;:
0 ::c u
20
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
::; Iia 0.25 .§. .. :5! Q 0.2
:::0 il:
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
/
Time concentration plots for MW-17
~
Chloride in MW-17
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-17
A
/ \
~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
.~ --
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
~rf/i -mE
Inti:=lA
~
~ ~ oS .. .. of! "3 VI
~ ...... .. ..::
E ::I 'c f! ::J
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
5'1'" ~~ !:o," ,.q
Time concentration plots for MW-17
~~ ,.q
Sulfate in MW-17
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-17
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
::; 50
"'iia .§. .. 40 ~ ]
is 30
20
10
0
1:"'''' ~'Ii
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
::;
"'iia 0.25 .§. .. :g 0.2 0 :::J ;:;:
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
Time concentration plots for MW-18
~PJ" ~'Ii 1:"''1 ~'Ii
~
"
Chloride in MW-18
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-18
-'" ~ \ "-\ \. ..... ~--
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
..... .... .A v
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-18
Sulfate in MW-18
2500
2000
::;-1500 liD .s
III .. ~ :I 1000 III
500
o +-----~----~----~----~----~----~----~----~--__J
60
50
40
::;-
}
E 30 :I 'c C! ;:)
20
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-18
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Va lues
• Non-Detected Values
100
90 I.-
f
80
70
:::;-60 'iia .§.
l..
fl
III 50 :2 0 V :c u 40
30
20
10
o
1.6
1.4
1.2
:::;-
'iii .§.
III "1:1 0.8
'g
::I u: 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
r:I\<fJ ~~ .,,,,1'
Time concentration plots for MW·19
Chloride in MW-19
A
~ \
/ Y
/' "' ~
V
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-19
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
A A v~~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
3000
2500
2000
::; Iii;
.§. 1500 CIJ ... ~ :::I III
1000
500
::;
}
E 15 ::I '2 ~ ;:)
10
5
Time concentration plots for MW-19
Sulfate in MW-19
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-19
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
80
70
60
:::r 50
"OD oS
CII 40 "C .~
:c u 30
20
10
0
rtJ~
<:)
0.4
0.35
0.3
:::r 0.25
"OD oS
CII 0.2 "C ·c 0 ::I ;:;: 0.15
0.1
0.05
o
-
ro-
Time concentration plots for MW·20
~ (fOJ
0
~
Chloride in MW-20
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-20
...
/'
./
./
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
4500
4000
3500
3000
~ 'iii! 2500 .§.
.2! ~ 2000
::I II)
1500
1000
500
o
40
35
30
~ 25
]
E 20
::I C I.! :l 15
10
5
0
<J01' QI{;
:;;;;;&.
to flO)
0
Time concentration prots for MW·20
Sulfate in MW-20
.......
~ ~ -.-.......
<",l'
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-20
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
" "V
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::;
~ .§.
CII :!:! !i ::c u
Time concentration plots for MW-22
Chloride in MW-22
80
70
60
50 ..--
40
30
20
10
0
<.:<t fa rJr1J <;J'I} 0
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-22
3.3 .------------------------------~
3.2 +---------------I-~---_I____',...._--------l
2.8
2.7
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::;-o:a oS
GO .... .l! ~ 11\
::;-...... ~
E :::I ·c
!! ::J
Time concentration plots for MW-22
Sulfate in MW-22
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
,l' ra c:FCIJ <;)
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-22
60
50
40
30
20
10
o +-----~----~----~----r---~~--~----~----~-----I
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
:::i' ... .§.
CII :2 !i :E u
:::i' ........ .. .§.
CII :2 !i ::I lI:
:§rSi 01::
Ini:i:~A
~.., ~
12
10
8
6
4
2
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
j:l'" ... .;,<:' '<~
Time concentration plots for MW·23
Chloride in MW-23
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-23
/ ~ ,.;,<:'
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::;-
'iW E-cu .. ~ ::I III
::;--~
E ::I 'c ~ ::J
Time concentration plots for MW·23
Sulfate in MW-23
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
a ~----~----~----~----~----~----r-----~----r---~
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
~ s§> ".,<f ~~ !' <:)'"
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-23
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
60
50 :'v-A
40
~ til;
oS
III ~ 30
0 :c u
20
10
o
0.4
0.35
0.3
~ 0.25 -OIl oS
III 0.2 'tJ .~
:I ii: 0.15
0.1
0.05
0
\:>" '<~ ~ \~
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Chloride in MW-24
-~ ~ ---,./'" ..
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-24
?' ~ ~~ 0
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
3500
3000
2500
:::; 'Oa 2000
.§.
GI .... :Ill 1500 ::I III
1000
500
12
10 I
8
:::;
]
E 6 ::I '2
e! ::::I
4
2
0
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Sulfate in MW-24
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-24
A
\
\ ,
~ ... -v,_
~
.J' --.r"
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
~ L.--~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::i' ...... .. .§.
III "CI '1: 0 \5
::i' ~ .§.
III "CI .~
::I ii:
Time concentration plots for MW-25
Chloride in MW-2S
40
35 ~ --A ~ ..... ~ 30
25
20
15
10
5
o
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
~ ~ # ~~ ~
~
V
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-2S
,!' ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW·25
Sulfate in MW-2S
1900
1850
1800
::;-
iio 1750
.§.
GI .. J!! 1700 3 III
1650
1600
1550
!' \" '<~ ft ~o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-2S
8 -r-------------------------------------------------~
7
6
::;-5
}
E 4 " .~
~ 3 -r-----------------------------------------------------------I
2
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
90
80
70
60
::. 'Ol; 50 .5-
GI 'a .1: 40 0 :c u
30
20
10
o
0.4
0.35
0.3
~ 0.25
'Ol;
.5-
GI 0.2 'a .~
" i:i: 0.15
0.1
0.05
0
s;:,"
</,"1 ~ ~~.f,
Time concentration plots for MW·26
Chloride in MW-26
• A A/\
~ ~-rvv \/\/-· ...
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-26
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
•
If II
III ~J
I
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::i .... .. .§.
QI .. ~ :s 11\
::i .... ~
E :s ·c !! :J
Time concentration plots for MWw26
Sulfate in MW-26
2500 ~----------------------------------------------------------~
2000 .r-------------------------~~~~----~~-\.--------=-~-----I
1500
1000
500
o
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Sl<'
.... ~<1' s:Y> '<~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-26
?' ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
50
45
40
35
::; 30 "iia .§.
CII 25 :g
0 ::E 20 u
15
10
5
o
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
::;
"iia 0.5 .§.
CII :2 (; 0.4
::I ii:
0.3
0.2
0.1
o
Time concentration plots for MW-27
Chloride in MW-27
-~ ,.-I
,.-.... / .,....... V
I""'",,~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-27
..
V\~ \/'\. --~ •
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
'" --
.-
'tt-
-~
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
~m=
IntiS::rA
~~
~ "'iilI §
III ... ::Ill ::s II>
~ ~
E ::s 'c I! ::>
600
500
400
300
200
100
34
33
32
31
Time concentration plots for MW-27
Sulfate in MW-27
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-27
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
100
80
:J' -"" .§.
III 60 "CJ .~
is
40
20
0.8
0.7
0.6
:J' 0.5
'iiii .§.
III 0.4 "CJ ·c 0 ::I u:: 0.3
0.2
0.1
0
s;l" .... ~~ do ,.,01
Time concentration plots for MW-28
Chloride in MW-28
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-28
/' ~ ~",""
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-28
Sulfate in MW-28
2550
2500
2450
~ 2400
...... .. .§. 2350 cu ... ~ ::I
11\ 2300
2250
2200
2150
$)" !' ~o.l' ~ ~ </,q .,.q '>~<:' ,>",<:'
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-28
4.5
4 t-----~~--------------------------------------------------I
3.5
3 t-------------~~,,---------------------------------------I
l 2.5
E ::I 'c 2 ~ ::J
1.5
0.5
o +------r----~------~----~----~------r_----~----_r----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::; 'Dli .s cu ~ ..5! .c u
::;
'Dli .s cu ~ 0 ::I li:
Time concentration plots for MW·29
Chloride in MW-29
45
40
35
30
A.
-V~ ~ ~
~/
25
20
15
10
5
o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-29
1.2 .,----------------------------~
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
o +-----~----~----r_--~~--~----~----~----~----~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Va lues
• Non·Detected Values
3000
2950
2900
2850
::i' liD 2800 .§.
GI .. J! 2750 "3 III
2700
2650
2600
2550
" "",.?
14
12
10
::i' ...... 8 ~
E
::0 ·c 6 I! ::l
4
2
0
j:l"
",>""
~
"O!f
~ ,,05'
Time concentration plots for MW-29
Sulfate in MW-29
~ ~
0 ~~ ... >.~
~ 0
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-29
~ ~'b->:'
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
160
140
120
:3' 100
Oil .§.
III 80 -a .~
:c u 60
40
20
0
~ ...... §'
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
:3' Oil 0.25 .§.
III -a '': 0.2 Q ,.
il:
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
b
" .. <I'
~ ~~
~ ~~""
Time concentration plots for MW-30
Chloride in MW-30
!l' ~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-30
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
1200
1000
800
:::;-
iia oS 600 GI .... ~ ::I <II
400
200
9
8
7
6
:::;-..... ~ 5
E ::I '2 4 ~ :::l
3
2
1
0
5:1"
.... ~<I' '<~
Time concentration plots for MW-30
Sulfate in MW-30
I' o
I' 0
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-30
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::.-... .§. .. ~ 0 :E u
::.-... .§.
GO :5! 0 ::I ii:
Time concentration plots for MW·31
Chloride in MW-31
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
\l" ~ ft ';~<' ~:f ~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-31
1.2 r------------------------------~
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
600
500 A-V"V
400
:::r """-III) .s 300 011 ... "' ~ :::J III
200
100
o
9
8 ,.../
7 V
6
:::r """-..! 5
E :::J 'c 4 ~ :J
3
2
o
Time concentration plots for MW-31
Sulfate in MW-3l
-~ ---"'. .Aoo....J"\ , .... -~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-3l
~ .... --"'-/ .,...
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
~
-'V"
---~
~ /
\/ ..
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
40
35
30
:;-25
Cia oS
GI 20 ~ 0 :E u 15
10
5
0
fl'1,
c,e<:/
0.35
0.3
0.25
:;-
Cia 0.2 oS
GI :!i! Is 0.15 :) il:
0.1
0.05
0
1:)'1,
c,e<i
flO, ,.~"
~o, ,.~"
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Chloride in MW-32
9[,~ fl<' ,.oS ... ~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-32
.I' "
;t' 'j
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Va lues
• Non-Detected Values
3000
2500
2000 .---
:::;-'iii;
.§. 1500 cu .. .. :I: ::J III
1000
500
o
4.5
4
3.5
3
:::;-
} 2.5
E ::J '2 2 ~
A J~
~ ::::I
1.5
1
0.5
o
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Sulfate in MW-32
.... ,,~ ..... ~--~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-32
\ A
\ / \-\ / ~ --. ~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
•
./
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
:i -l1li .§. .. "0 ';: .2 .Ii: u
:i "iia .§. .. ~ 0 ,.
it
Time concentration plots for MW-34
Chloride in MW-34
75 ~------------------------------------------------------------~
74
73
72
71
70
69
68
0.552
0.55
0.548
0.546
0.544
0.542
0.54
0.538
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-34
7
/
/
/
/
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
2300
2280
2260
2240
:::r 2220 .... tID .§. 2200 GI ... ra :t: :::0 2180 II>
2160
2140
2120
2100
28
27.5
27
26.5
:::r .... ~ 26
E
:::0 'c 25.5 ~ :I
25
24.5
24
23.5
~o$' ~o
~
"-
~ <J Q'li
Time concentration plots for MW-34
Sulfate in MW-34
"-"-"-" " ~ ~ v---
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-34
~ <J Q'li
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
~
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
:; 50
bo .§.
cu 40 .., .;:
0 :c u 30
20
10
o
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
:;
bo 0.25 .§.
cu ~ 0.2 0 ::J u::
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Chloride in MW-35
~
'" ~ ~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-35
110..
~ ------............... .,..
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
.....
• Detected Va lues
• Non-Detected Values
:J' 1500 '00 .§.
GI .. ~ ::I 1000 OIl
30
25
20
:J' }
E 15 ::I 'c I! :I
10
5
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Sulfate in MW-35
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-35
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-36
Chloride in MW-36
60
•
50
40
:;;
Cia E-
O) 30 "0 .~
:;:: u
20
10
0
9<;;>-or-.:s
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-36
0.35 r-------------------------------. •
0.3
0.25 +-------------------------------1
i 0.2 1-----------------------------1 .. ..,
'g 0.15
Ii:
0.1
0.05 +-----------------------------1
a ~---------------------------~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
~~~
InLC~A
~ ~
Time concentration plots for MW-36
Sulfate in MW-36
3000
•
2500 .
2000
::;-
'iii .§; 1500 S ~ ,.
Ii)
1000
500
0
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-36
30 r-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
25 t-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ •
20 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
l
E 15 ,. 'c ~ ;:)
10 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
o ~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
~ws
Ini:c~A
~-!5'...a
~ 'iia .5.
III -.:I '5 :E u
~ bi .5.
G/ -.:I ·c 0 :I ii:
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Time concentration plots for MW-37
Chloride in MW-37
•
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-37
•
r(, ......
~>$
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
3000
2500
2000
~ -011 .§. 1500 GO ... ~ :> III
1000
500
0
20
18
16
14
~ 12 }
E 10 :> ·2
I! 8 :I
6
4
2
0
Time concentration plots for MW-37
Sulfate in MW-37
•
go ......
of
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-37
..
go ...... .,..:s
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
3rd Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
Tab J
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Tuesday, November 22, 2011 11 :57 AM
'[e-mail]'
'Phillip Goble'; David Frydenlund; Jo Ann Tischler; Harold Roberts; Jaime Massey
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2011 03 Groundwater Monitoring
C11 090045_R1.csv; C11 090914 (1 ).CSV; C11 080269_R2.csv; C11 080529.CSV;
C11070824.CSV; C11 070274.CSV; C11 090325.CSV; 11081 08-EDD CSV.csv; 1108246-
EDD.csv; 11 07136-EDD.csv; 11 09163-EDD.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for groundwater monitoring conducted at the White
Mesa Mill during the third quarter of 2011, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
Quality Assurance Manager
1