DRC-2011-006309 - 0901a0688023a08d

DENISON
MINES
Sent VIA Federal Express
May 27, 2011
Mr, Rusty Lundberg
Co-Executive Secretary
Utah Water Quality Board
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 60265
USA
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.denisonmines.com
Re: Transmittalof 1st Quarter 2011 Groundwater MonUoring Report
Groundwater QuaUty Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium MiU
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitoring Report for the
1 st Quarter of 2011 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as
two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truly,
DENISON MINES (USA) CORP.
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance and Permitting
cc: Ron F. Hochstein
David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
DENISONI)~~
MINES
Sent VIA Federal Express
May 27, 2011
Mr. Rusty Lundberg
Co-Executive Secretary
Utah Water Quality Board
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Re: Transmittal of lst Quarter 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Report
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
1050 17th Street, Suite 950
Denver, CO 80265
USA
Tel: 303 628·7798
Fax: [phone]
www.denisonmines.com
Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004 White Mesa Uranium Mill
Dear Mr. Lundberg:
Enclosed are two copies of the White Mesa Uranium Mill Groundwater Monitoring Report for the
1st Quarter of2011 as required by the Groundwater Quality Discharge Permit UGW370004, as well as
two CDs each containing a word searchable electronic copy of the report.
If you should have any questions regarding this report please contact me.
Yours very truIY'~
~INES (USA) CORP,
Jo Ann Tischler
Director, Compliance and Permitting
cc: Ron F. Hochstein
David C. Frydenlund
Harold R. Roberts
David E. Turk
Katherine A. Weinel
Central Files
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
State of Utah
Groundwater Discharge Permit No. UGW370004
1st Quarter
(January through March)
2011
Prepared by:
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
Suite 950 1050 17i11' Street
Denver CO 80265
May 27,2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1
1.1 GWDP Modifications During the First Quarter ................................................... 1
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ....................................................................... 1
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter ....................................... 1
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring .......................................................... 1
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring .......................................................... 2
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring ....................................................................... 2
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed .................................................................................... 2
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring ..................................................................... 3
2.2 Field Data ............................................................................................................. 3
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling ............................................................ 3
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .......................................................................... 3
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 4
2.4 Laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring ..................................................... 5
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results .......................................................................... 5
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background ................................ 5
2.4.3 Compliance Status ........................................................................................ 5
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map ........................................ 6
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION ....................................... 6
3.1 Field QC Samples ................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs ...................................................................... 7
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review ............................................................................. 7
3.4 Data Validation .................................................................................................... 8
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation ...................................................................... 9
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation ............................................................................ 10
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation ................................................................. 10
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist ...................................................................... 10
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation ........................................................................ 11
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation ................................................................................. 11
3.4.7 QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates ................................... 11
3.4.8 Radiologies Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation .............................. 11
3.4.9 Rinsate Blanks ............................................................................................ 12
3.4.10 Other Laboratory QAlQC ........................................................................... 13
4.0 CORRECTNE ACTION REPORT ...................................................................... 16
4.1 Identification and Definition of the Problem ..................................................... 16
4.2 Assignment of Responsibility for Investigating the Problem ............................ 16
4.3 Investigation and Determination of Cause ofthe Problem ................................ 16
4.4 Determination of a Corrective Action to Eliminate the Problem ....................... 17
4.5 Assigning and Accepting Responsibility for Implementing the Corrective ...... 17
4.6 Implementing the Corrective Action and Evaluating Effectiveness .................. 17
4.7 Verifying That the Corrective Action Has Eliminated the Problem .................. 17
4.8 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period .................................. 17
6.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT ................................................... 18
7.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION ................................................................ 19
1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Well Sampling for the Period
Table 2 Exceedances and Acceleration Requirements
Table 3 GWCL Exceedances Through First Quarter 2011 Under the June 17,2010
and February 15, 2011 GWDP
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1 Field Data QAJQC Evaluation
G-2 Holding Time Evaluation
G-3 Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check
G-4 Analytical Method Check
G-5 Reporting Limit Check
G-6 Trip Blank Evaluation
G-7 QAJQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
G-8 Radiologies Counting Error
G-9 Laboratory Matrix QC
G-10 Rinsate Evaluation
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
11
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the Routine Groundwater Monitoring Report, as required under Part LF.l of State
of Utah Groundwater Discharge Pennit No. UGW370004 (the "GWDP") for the first
quarter of 2011 (the "quarter") for Denison Mines (USA) Corp's. ("DUSA's") White
Mesa Uranium Mill (the "Mill"). As required under Parts I.E. 1 , LE.2 and LE.5 of the
GWDP this Report includes all recorded field measurements and laboratory analyses for
well monitoring conducted during the quarter.
1.1 GWDP Modifications During the First Quarter
During the first quarter of 2011, the approved June 17, 2010 GWDP was revised on
February 15, 2011. The revision incorporated changes necessary to address various
activities at the Mill. No changes were issued to the Groundwater Compliance Limits
("GWCLs") specified in Table 2; however, the following were changes issued for the
groundwater monitoring program described herein. The February 15, 2011 revision to
the GWDP, Part 1.E.2 changed the status of MW-20 and MW-22 from background
monitoring wells to general monitoring wells. The frequency of monitoring for these
wells was changed from quarterly to semiannually. Additionally, the revised GWDP
changed the monitoring requirements for MW-33 and MW-34. Because MW-33 has
been dry since installation no further head monitoring or sampling is required per the
revised GWDP. Head monitoring on a quarterly basis is still required in MW-34, but
sampling is no longer required per the revised GWDP. Two replacement monitoring
wells for MW-33 and MW-34 are also required to be installed as a result of the revised
GWDP. These two replacement wells will be monitored under this groundwater
monitoring program upon installation and development.
2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
2.1 Samples and Measurements Taken During the Quarter
A map showing the location of all groundwater monitoring wells, piezometers, existing
wells, chlorofonn contaminant investigation wells and nitrate contaminant investigation
wells is attached under Tab A. Groundwater samples and measurements were taken
during this reporting period (January through March), as discussed in the remainder of
this section.
2.1.1 Groundwater Compliance Monitoring
Groundwater samples and field measurements collected during the first quarter included
both quarterly and accelerated monitoring. Accelerated monitoring is discussed below in
Section 2.1.2. In this first quarter report, samples classified as being collected quarterly
include those wells which are routinely sampled every quarter as well as semi-annual
wells which are sampled on an accelerated quarterly schedule due to exceedances
reported in previous quarterly reports. Wells which are sampled routinely every quarter
1
N:lRequired ReportslOroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\20 II Q I \20 11_ Q I_OW _Report tcxt.doc
were analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2 and Part I.E.1.c) 2)ii of the GWDP
dated June 17, 2010 and February 15, 2011. The semi-annual wells which have been
accelerated to quarterly are analyzed only for those parameters which exceeded the
Groundwater Compliance Limits ("GWCLs") in Table 2 and Part I.E.1.c) 2)ii of the
GWDP as described in the 4th Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report (DUSA March
1,2011).
Table 1 of this report provides an overview of all wells sampled during the current
period, along with the required sampling frequency applicable to each well during the
current monitoring period, the date samples were collected from each well, and the
date(s) analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies). Table 1 also
indicates which sample numbers are associated with the required duplicates, and rinsate
blanks.
2.1.2 Accelerated Groundwater Monitoring.
In addition to the quarterly monitoring referenced above, accelerated monthly sampling
was performed, and results reported, for the wells indicated in Table 1. The accelerated
sampling frequency, analyte list and well list were determined based on the previously
reported analytical results and are included in Table 2 of this report.
Table 1 provides an overview of the wells sampled for the accelerated monthly program
along with the routine sampling frequency as well as the accelerated sampling frequency,
the date samples were collected from each well, the assoCiated duplicates and the date(s)
which analytical data were received from the contract laboratory(ies).
2.1.3 Background Well Monitoring
A requirement was added to the GWDP on March 17, 2008, which required the Mill to
begin quarterly sampling of wells MW-20 and MW-22 to develop eight quarters of
background data. A background report for MW-20 and MW-22 was submitted on June 9,
2010. These two wells were continually monitored on a quarterly basis through the first
quarter of 2011. As noted in Section 1.1 above, on February 15, 2011, the sampling
frequency requirements for MW-20 and MW-22 were changed to semi-annually. MW-
20 and MW-22 were sampled during the first quarter 2011 either before (as in the case of
MW-22) the February 15, 2011 permit revision, or shortly after the receipt of the
February 15, 2011 permit revision (as in the case of MW-20). These data are included for
information purposes. The revised frequency for sampling MW-20 and MW-22 will be
implemented starting in the second quarter 2011. Table 1 indicates the sampling dates
and the dates DUSA received laboratory data for these wells during 2011.
2.1.4 Parameters Analyzed
All routine quarterly groundwater monitoring samples were analyzed for the parameters
listed in Table 2 and Part I.E. 1. c) 2)ii of the GWDP dated June 17,2010 and February 15,
2
N:lRequired ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report12011 QI12011_QI_GW_Report text.doc
2011. The accelerated monitoring samples were analyzed for a more limited and specific
parameter list as shown in Table 2 of this report.
2.1.5 Groundwater Head Monitoring
Depth to groundwater was measured in the following wells and/or piezometers, pursuant
to Part I.E.2 ofthe GWDP dated June 17,2010 and February 15, 2011:
• The groundwater compliance monitoring wells including MW -20, MW -22, MW-
34, and MW-35.
• Existing monitoring well MW-4 and all of the temporary chloroform investigation
wells.
• Piezometers -P-l, P-2, P-3, P-4 and P-5.
• Nitrate monitoring wells.
• In addition to the above, depth to water measurements are routinely observed in
conjunction with sampling events for all wells sampled during quarterly and
accelerated efforts, regardless of the sampling purpose.
All water levels used for groundwater contour mapping were measured and recorded
within 5 calendar days of each other as indicated by the measurement dates in the
summary sheet under Tab D.
2.2 Field Data
Attached under Tab B are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
quarterly effort for the groundwater compliance monitoring wells referred to in paragraph
2.1.1, above. Sampling dates are listed in Table 1. Tab B also includes field data sheets
for wells MW-20 and MW-22, which will change to a semi-annual frequency
commencing in the second quarter 2011 as discussed above.
Attached under Tab C are copies of all field data sheets recorded in association with the
January and March 2010 accelerated monitoring and sampling efforts.
2.3 Laboratory Results -Quarterly Sampling
2.3.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
All analytical results are provided by one of the Mill's two contract analytical
laboratories Energy Laboratories ("EL") or America West Analytical Laboratories
("A W AL").
3
N:lRequired ReportslOroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 II Q 1120 11_ Q I_OW _Report text. doc
Table 1 lists the dates when analytical results were reported to the Quality Assurance
("QA") Manager for each well.
Results from analysis of samples collected for the first quarter under the GWDP (i.e., all
regular quarterly and accelerated samples), are provided in Tab E. Also included under
Tab E are the results of analyses for duplicate and rinsate blank samples for this sampling
effort, as identified in Table 1.
The laboratory report dates for samples collected for the January and March accelerated
sampling (i.e. quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Table 1. Results from
analysis of samples collected for the January and March accelerated sampling (i.e.
quarterly accelerated to monthly) are provided in Tab F. Also included under Tab Fare
the results of analyses for duplicate samples for this sampling effort, as identified in
Table 1.
Copies of laboratory QNQuality Control ("QC") Summaries are included with the
reported data under their corresponding Tabs.
2.3.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
Under the GWDP (June 17, 2010 and February 15, 2011), background groundwater
quality has been determined on a well-by-well basis, as defined by the mean plus second
standard deviation concentration or the equivalent. New GWCLs that reflect this
background groundwater quality have been set for all monitoring wells in the January 20,
2010 GWDP. These new GWCLs were in effect for sampling required during the current
first quarter monitoring period.
Exceedances of the January 21,2010 GWCLs as reported in 2010 reports determined the
accelerated monthly monitoring program implemented during this quarter.
Exceedances of the GWCLs for the first quarter (January through March) of2011 are
listed in Table 2 for sampling required under the revised GWDP (June 17, 2010 and
February 15, 2011). Table 3 shows the accelerated sampling program which started in
the second quarter 2010 and shows the results and frequency of the accelerated sampling
conducted since that time.
It should be noted, however, that, because the GWCLs have been set at the mean plus
second standard deviation, or the equivalent, un-impacted groundwater would normally
be expected to exceed the GWCLs approximately 2.5% of the time. Therefore,
exceedances are expected in approximately 2.5% of all sample results, and do not
necessarily represent impacts to groundwater from Mill operations.
4
N :\Required ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\20 II Q I \20 11_ Q I_OW _Report text doc
2.4 Laboratory Results -Accelerated Monitoring
2.4.1 Copy of Laboratory Results
The analytical results for the accelerated monthly monitoring of the various constituents
in certain monitoring wells for the quarter are provided at Tab F.
2.4.2 Regulatory Framework and Groundwater Background
As a result ofthe issuance of the revised GWDP on January 20,2010, which sets revised
GWCLs, all requirements to perform accelerated monitoring under Part I.G.1 ofthe
previous GWDP ceased effective on January 20, 2010, and the effect ofthe issuance of
the revised GWDP was to create a "clean slate" for all constituents in all wells going
forward.
This means that accelerated monitoring during the first quarter 2011 was required under
the revised GWDP for only those constituents that exceeded the GWCLs in 2010.
2.4.3 Compliance Status
Analytes which have exceeded the GWCLs set forth in the GWDP for 2010 are
summarized in Table 2. The analytes which exceeded their respective GWCLs during the
first quarter 2011 will be sampled on an accelerated schedule as noted in Table 2.
Analytes which exceeded their respective GWCLs during 2010 are currently sampled on
an accelerated schedule. A review of the accelerated data collected during first quarter
2011 indicate that several analytes have exceeded their respective GWCLs for two
consecutive sampling periods as reported in DUSA's letter to DRC on May 13, 2011.
Table 3 summarizes the results of the accelerated sampling program from first quarter
2010 through first quarter 2011.
Part I.G.l c) of the GWDP states, with respect to exceedances of GWCLs, "that the
Permittee shall prepare and submit within 30 calendar days to the Executive Secretary a
plan and a time schedule for assessment of the sources, extent and potential dispersion of
the contamination, and an evaluation of potential remedial action to restore and maintain
groundwater quality to insure that Permit limits will not be exceeded at the compliance
monitoring point and that DMT or BAT will be reestablished." DUSA submitted an
exceedanxce notice on May 13, 2011 for the first quarter 2011 results. The summary in
the Exceedance Notice includes, for each exceedance, a brief discussion of whether such
a plan and schedule is required at this time in light of other actions currently being
undertaken by Denison, as determined by Utah Department of Environmental Quality
("UDEQ") Staff and stated in teleconferences with Denison on April 27 and May 2,
2011. Where applicable, the plans and time schedules for assessment will be submitted
to the Executive Secretary within 30 days of the May 13, 2011 Exceedance Notice.
5
N:lRequired ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report1201l QI12011_Ql_GW_Report text, doc
2.5 Depth to Groundwater and Water Table Contour Map
As stated above, a listing of groundwater level readings for the quarter (shown as depth to
groundwater in feet) is included under Tab D. The data from Tab D has been interpreted
(kriged) and plotted in a water table contour map, provided under Tab H.
The water table contour map provides the location and identity of all of the wells and
piezometers for which depth to groundwater is recorded. The groundwater elevation at
each well and piezometer, measured in feet above mean sea level, and isocontour lines to
delineate groundwater flow directions observed during the quarter's sampling event are
displayed on the map.
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND DATA VALIDATION
The Mill QA Manager performed a QAlQC review to confirm compliance of the
monitoring program with requirements of the QAP. As required in the QAP, data QA
includes preparation and analysis of QC samples in the field, review of field procedures,
an analyte completeness review, and quality control review of laboratory data methods
and data. Identification of field QC samples collected and analyzed is provided in
Section 3.1. Discussion of adherence to Mill sampling Standard Operating Procedures
("SOPs") is provided in Section 3.2. Analytical completeness review results are provided
in Section 3.3. The steps and tests applied to check laboratory data QAlQC are discussed
in Sections 3.4.4 through 3.4.9 below.
The Analytical Laboratories have provided summary reports of the analytical QAlQC
measurements necessary to maintain conformance with National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference ("NELAC") certification and reporting protocol.
The analytical laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports, including copies ofthe Mill's Chain
of Custody and Analytical Request Record forms for each set of Analytical Results,
follow the analytical results under Tabs E and F. Results of review of the laboratory
QAlQC information are provided under Tab G and discussed in Section 3.4, below.
3.1 Field QC Samples
The following field QC samples were generated by Mill personnel and submitted to the
analytical laboratory in order to assess the quality of data resulting from the field
sampling program:
Two duplicate samples were collected during quarterly sampling as indicated in Table 1.
The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and analyzed for the same
parameters as permit-required samples.
One duplicate sample was collected during each month of accelerated sampling as
indicated in Table 1. The QC samples were sent blind to the analytical laboratory and
analyzed for the same accelerated parameters as the parent sample.
6
N;\Required ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 II Q 1120 11_ Q I_OW _Report text.doc
Three trip blanks were provided by EL and returned and analyzed with the quarterly
monitoring samples.
One trip blank per month was provided by EL and returned and analyzed with the
accelerated monthly monitoring samples.
Three trip blanks were provided by A W AL and returned and analyzed with the quarterly
monitoring samples.
One trip blank per month was provided by A W AL and returned and analyzed with the
accelerated monitoring samples.
Rinsate samples were also collected between well samples where nondedicated purging
equipment was used. Rinsate samples were labeled with the name of the subsequently
purged well with a terminal letter "R" added (e.g. TW 4-7R). The results of these
analyses are included with the routine analyses under Tab E. One rinsate blank sample
was collected during this quarterly sampling event as indicated in Table 1. All of the
groundwater wells have dedicated sampling equipment except MW-33, MW-34, and
MW-35. A rinsate blank sample was collected from the pump prior to sampling MW-35.
There is no rinsate blank associated with either MW-33 as it was dry, or MW-34 which is
sampled with a disposable bailer due to the low volume of water present. Sampling with
a disposable bailer is contemplated by the approved QAP for wells which cannot be
sampled using a pump.
Duplicate, trip blank and rinsate sample results are shown in Tab G.
3.2 Adherence to Mill Sampling SOPs
On a review of adherence by Mill personnel to the existing sampling SOPs, the QA
Manager observed that QAlQC requirements established in the QAP were being adhered
to and that the SOP's were implemented, except as described below.
3.3 Analyte Completeness Review
All analyses required by the GWDP for the quarterly wells were performed. The
accelerated quarterly sampling (quarterly to monthly) required for this quarter, as shown
in Tables 2 and 3, was performed as required except as noted below. The accelerated
sampling for the semi-annual wells (semi-annual to quarterly) was completed as required
by the GWDP and as shown in Tables 2 and 3 with one exception as noted below.
Accelerated sampling for gross alpha in MW -26 was initiated as soon as the exceedance
requirement was identified in February 2011. The fourth quarter data were received in
late February 2011 due to an analytical problem that was identified with the fourth
quarter 2010 sample which required the sample be reanalyzed within the approved
holding time of 6 months. A gross alpha sample was not collected in MW-26 in January
2011, because the data for the fourth quarter 2010 sampling event was not received until
7
N:lRequired ReportslOroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\20 11 Q 1 \20 11_ Q I_OW _Report text.doc
February 2011. Due to the receipt date of the reanalyzed data (February) it was not
possible to collect a sample in January.
Denison's management review of groundwater QA/QC identified an error in the checking
spreadsheet for field pH. No other analytes were affected. Correction of the spreadsheet
resulted in corrections to field pH entries reported in the Exceedance Notices for Q1
through Q4, 2010 as follows:
• Fourteen of the corrected pH values remained within compliance limits and there
were no changes other than the values reported.
• Ten pH values in five wells which were not previously reported as exceedances
have been identified as exceedances. All five wells were already in accelerated
monitoring status for either pH or another analyte and field pH measurements
were collected.
• Seven pH values in five wells which were incorrectly reported as exceedances
have been identified as being in compliance. In all of these instances no data
were lost as a result of the corrections to the data reporting and checking
spreadsheets.
• One instance of a missed accelerated sampling event for field pH was noted as a
result of the corrections to the spreadsheet. The field pH in MW-29 was outside
compliance limits in the fourth quarter 2010 and accelerated (quarterly) sampling
should have begun in the first quarter 2011; however, the spreadsheet error and
changed pH entry was not identified until second quarter 2011.
It should be noted that per Denison's letter to UDEQ of January 31, 2011, GWCLs for pH
are under re-evaluation, and proposed revised GWCLs will be submitted to UDEQ on or
before June 30, 2011. Any pH exceedance reported in previous exceedance tables for first
through fourth quarter 2010, or in the corrected table in the May 13, 2011 Exceedance
Notice, may no longer be an actual exceedance following implementation of new
GWCLs. Corrective actions are described in more detail in Section 4 ofthis report.
3.4 Data Validation
The QAP and GWDP identify the data validation steps and data quality control checks
required for the groundwater monitoring program. Consistent with these requirements,
the QA Manager performed the following evaluations: a field data QA/QC evaluation, a
receipt temperature check, a holding time check, an analytical method check, a reporting
limit check, a trip blank check, a QA/QC evaluation of routine sample duplicates, a
QA/QC evaluation of accelerated sample duplicates, a gross alpha counting error
evaluation and a review of each laboratory's reported QA/QC information. Each
evaluation is discussed in the following sections. Data check tables indicating the results
of each test are provided under Tab G.
8
N:IRequired ReportslGroundwatcr Quarterly Monitoring Report\20 II Q I \20 11_ Q I_OW _Report text-doc
3.4.1 Field Data QAlQC Evaluation
The QA Manager performs a review of all field recorded parameters to assess their
adherence with QAP requirements. The assessment involved review of two sources of
information: the Field Data Sheets and the Quarterly Depth to Water summary sheet.
Review of the Field Data Sheets addresses well purging volumes and stability of five
parameters: conductance, pH, temperature, redox potential, and turbidity. Review of the
Depth to Water data confirms that all depth measurements were conducted within a five-
day period. The results of this quarter's review are provided in Tab G.
Based upon this review, all quarterly sampled locations conformed to the QAP
requirement to evacuate two well casing volumes before sampling except for MW-3A,
MW-12, MW-23 , MW-24, and MW-3S. In all cases these wells were evacuated to
dryness before two casing volumes could be pumped. In addition, MW -20 was purged to
dryness after 2 casing volumes had been purged.
All accelerated sampled locations conformed to the QAP requirement to evacuate two
well casing volumes before sampling.
During review of the field data sheets, it was observed that sampling personnel
consistently recorded depth to water for the quarterly and accelerated sampling programs
to the nearest 0.01 foot.
The review of the field sheets for compliance with QAP requirements resulted in the
observations noted below. The QAP requirements in Section 6.2.7 specifically state that
field parameters have to be stabilized to within 10% over at least 2 consecutive
measurements. The QAP states that turbidity should be less than S Nephlometric
Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that
has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less
than S NTU prior to sampling. As such the noted observations regarding turbidity
measurements greater than S NTU below are included for information purposes only.
• Turbidity measurements were less than S NTU for all of the quarterly wells
except MW-S, MW-12, MW-19, MW-20, MW-32, and MW-34. The QAP does
not require that turbidity measurements be less than S NTU prior to sampling. Per
the QAP Section 6.2.7 d) (v) Turbidity measurements prior to sampling were
within a 10% Relative Percent Difference ("RPD") for all quarterly sampling
wells.
• Turbidity measurements were less than S NTU for all of the accelerated sampling.
Turbidity measurements prior to sampling were within a 10% RPD for all
accelerated sampling wells
DUSA's letter to UDEQ of March 26, 2010 discusses further why turbidity does not
appear to be an appropriate parameter for assessing well stabilization. In response to
UDEQ's subsequent correspondence dated June 1, 2010 and June 24, 2010, DUSA is
9
N:lRequired ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 II QI12011_QI_ OW_Report tcxt.doc
currently implementing a monitoring well redevelopment program. The redevelopment
program has reviewed the available turbidity data for the nitrate wells and has developed
a list of wells that have undergone redevelopment utilizing several strategies. The
redevelopment strategies include additional surging and bailing and overpumping as
necessary. Surging and bailing and overpumping for the nitrate and chloroform wells is
complete. Redevelopment of the groundwater wells is in progress. Data from the
redevelopment of the groundwater wells will be reviewed with the data from the
redevelopment of the chloroform and nitrate program wells. A single report will be
prepared at the completion of the redevelopment program for the wells in all three
programs, which is planned for submittal on or before the end of the third quarter 2011.
DUSA will review the redevelopment data and summarize the status of the Mill wells.
Redevelopment results will be discussed with UDEQ in an effort to come to a consensus
regarding turbidity considerations for the groundwater wells at the Mill site. All other
field parameters (conductance, pH, redox potential, and temperature) for all wells were
within the required RPD for both quarterly and accelerated sampling.
3.4.2 Holding Time Evaluation
QAP Table 1 identifies the method holding times for each suite of parameters. Sample
holding time checks are provided under Tab G. All samples were received and analyzed
within the required holding time except for the laboratory pH measurement in the rinsate
blank MW-35R as noted by the "H" qualifier in the laboratory data which is included in
Tab E. Laboratory pH is not a required parameter on Table 2 of the GWDP. The
required field pH measurement was collected at the time of sampling as required by the
GWDP and as such there is no affect on the quality or usability of the data.
3.4.3 Receipt Temperature Evaluation
Chain of Custody sheets (for AWAL) and temperature blank data sheets (for EL) were
reviewed to confirm compliance with the QAP requirement in QAP Table 1 that samples
be received at 6°C or lower. Sample receipt temperature checks are provided under Tab
G. All quarterly and accelerated samples were received within the required temperature
limit.
3.4.4 Analytical Method Checklist
All analytical methods reported by both laboratories were checked against the required
methods specified in Table 1 of the QAP. Analytical method check results are provided
in Tab G. The review indicated that all quarterly and accelerated samples were analyzed
in accordance with Table 1 of the QAP.
It is recommended that the QAP be improved and updated to include additional
methodologies currently in use by other laboratories certified under the Environmental
Lab Certification Program administered by the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality ("UDEQ") Bureau of Lab Improvement. Potentially, to accommodate ongoing
improvement in technology and methodology, the entire Table 1 and the Chloroform
10
N :\Required Report.IOroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\20 11 Q 1 \20 11_ Q I_OW _Report te.t.doc
Investigation Appendix table should be revised to include other currently approved
analytical methods in use by other Utah certified laboratories.
3.4.5 Reporting Limit Evaluation
All analytical method reporting limits reported by both laboratories were checked against
the reporting limits specified in the QAP Table 1. Reporting limit evaluations are
provided in Tab G. All analytes were measured and reported to the required reporting
limits except several sets of routine and accelerated sample results had the reporting limit
raised for at least one analyte due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution as noted
in Section 3.4.9. In all cases the reported value for the analyte was higher than the
increased detection limit.
3.4.6 Trip Blank Evaluation
All trip blank results were reviewed to identify any blank contamination. Trip blank
evaluations are provided in Tab G. All trip blank results associated with both the
quarterly and accelerated samples were less than detection level for all VOCs.
3.4.7 QAlQC Evaluation for Routine Sample Duplicates
Section 9.1.4 a) of the QAP states that RPDs will be calculated for the comparison of
duplicate and original field samples. The QAP acceptance limits for RPDs between the
duplicate and original field sample is less than or equal to 20% unless the measured
results (described as activities in the QAP) are less than 5 times the required detection
limit. This standard is based on the EPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, February 1994, 9240.1-05-01 as cited
in the QAP. The RPDs are calculated for all duplicate pairs with detections in both the
parent and duplicate sample for all analytes regardless of whether or not the reported
concentrations are greater than 5 times the required detection limits; however, data will
be considered noncompliant only when the results are greater than 5 times the required
detection limit and the RPD is greater than 20%. The additional duplicate information is
provided for information purposes.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the quarterly samples. Results of the
RPD test are provided under Tab G.
All duplicate results were within a 20% RPD in the accelerated samples. Results of the
RPD test are provided under Tab G.
3.4.8 Radiologics Counting Error and Duplicate Evaluation
Section 9.14 of the QAP requires that all gross alpha analysis reported with an activity
equal to or greater than the GWCL, shall have a counting variance that is equal to or less
than 20% of the reported activity concentration. An error term may be greater than 20%
11
N :\Required ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\20 II Q I \20 11_ Q 1_ GW _Report te.l.doc
of the reported activity concentration when the sum of the activity concentration and
error term is less than or equal to the GWCL.
Section 9.4 of the QAP also requires a comparability check between the sample and field
duplicate sample results utilizing the formula provided in the text. The quarterly and
accelerated sample and duplicate results met the comparability check specified in the
QAP.
Results of quarterly and accelerated radiologic sample QC are provided under Tab G. All
quarterly and accelerated radiologic sample results met the counting error requirement
specified above.
3.4.9 Rinsate Blanks
One rinsate blank and one DIPB were collected. Rinsate blank sample checks are
provided in Tab G.
Per the approved QAP, DIFBs are not required and as such there are no acceptance
criteria. The DIFB had reported detections of bicarbonate as HC03. (bicarbonate)
chloride, and sulfate. It is important to note that several of the method blanks also had
detections of sulfate and bicarbonate, and the detections of those analytes in both the
rinsate blanks and DIFB are most likely the result of low level laboratory contamination.
Chloride was not detected in the rinsate blank, and therefore its detection is not
applicable to the results and has no affect on the quality or usability of the results.
The rinsate blank sample had reported low level concentrations of bicarbonate, nitrate,
sulfate and iron. A comparison of the rinsate blank sample concentration levels to the
QAP requirements -that rinsate sample concentrations be one order of magnitude lower
than that of the actual well -indicated that all of the analytes but nitrate met this
criterion.
The nitrate levels reported in the rinsate blank samples for this investigation are similar to
the nitrate rinsate sample concentrations reported for the previous nitrate and chloroform
sampling programs. The investigation into the nitrate reported in the rinsate blanks will
continue as part of the chloroform and nitrate sampling programs because dedicated
pumps have been installed into all of the current groundwater wells and rinsate blanks are
not anticipated during the groundwater program. The data collected for this ongoing
investigation under the nitrate and chloroform programs is as follows:
• The nitrate concentrations in the rinsate samples from both the chloroform
sampling program and the nitrate sampling program are just slightly above the
detection limit and are not dependent on or affected by the previous sample
concentrations.
• The presence of nitrate in both the chloroform and nitrate sampling programs
indicates that the contamination is due to external factors such as the nitric acid
rinse during the decontamination process and potential absorption of nitrogen
12
N :\Required ReportslOroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 11 Q 112011_ Q I_OW _Report text.doc
from the nitric acid into the non-stainless steel portions of the purging equipment
including the pump tubing and connectors.
The investigation into the nitrate in the rinsate blanks is continuing, with additional focus
on the rinsate collection process. Nitric acid introduced during the decontamination
process is the single highest possible source of nitrate ions. However, there may be some
contribution of nitrate from the decontamination process andlor the purging equipment.
To address these issues, the decontamination process and rinsate collection process are
being reviewed to determine if the purging equipment in combination with the nitric acid
wash used during the decontamination process are causing the nitrate detections in the
rinsate blanks.
Corrective actions are described in Section 4.0
3.4.10 Other Laboratory QAlQC
Section 9.2 of the QAP requires that the laboratory's QAlQC Manager check the
following items in developing data reports: (1) sample preparation information is correct
and complete, (2) analysis information is correct and complete, (3) appropriate analytical
laboratory procedures are followed, (4) analytical results are correct and complete, (5)
QC samples are within established control limits, (6) blanks are within QC limits, (7)
special sample preparation and analytical requirements have been met, and (8)
documentation is complete. In addition to other laboratory checks described above,
DUSA's QA Manager rechecks QC samples and blanks (items (5) and (6)) to confirm
that the percent recovery for spikes and the relative percent difference for spike
duplicates are within the method-specific required limits, or that the case narrative
sufficiently explains any deviation from these limits. Results of this quantitative check
are provided under Tab G. All lab QAlQC results from both EL and A WAL samples for
compounds regulated under the GWDP met these requirements. There were QC results
which did not meet laboratory established acceptance limits, as identified in Tab G and
described below.
There were no qualifiers attached to the A W AL tetrahydrofuran data.
Seventeen sets of quarterly sample results (thirteen wells, two duplicates, one rinsate and
one DIFB) and six sets of accelerated samples had the reporting limit raised for at least
one analyte due to matrix interference andlor sample dilution. In all cases the reported
value for the analyte was higher than the increased detection limit. Data are qualified by
the laboratory with a "D" flag when the reporting limit is raised due to dilution or matrix
interferences.
The check samples included at least the following: a method blank, a laboratory control
spike ("LCS"), a matrix spike (.oMS") and a matrix spike duplicate ("MSD"), or the
equivalent, where applicable. It should be noted that:
• Laboratory fortified blanks are equivalent to LCSs.
13
N:lRequired ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report\20ll QI\2011_QI_GW_Report te.~doc
• Laboratory reagent blanks are equivalent to method blanks.
• Post digestion spikes are equivalent to MSs.
• Post digestion spike duplicates are equivalent to MSDs.
• For method E900.I, used to determine gross alpha, a sample duplicate was
used instead of a MSD.
All qualifiers, and the corresponding explanations reported in the QNQC Summary
Reports for any of the check samples for any of the analytical methods were reviewed by
the QA Manager.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that a MS/MSD (referred to as Duplicate Spike [Matrix
spike] in the QAP) pair be analyzed with each analytical batch. The QAP does not
specify acceptance limits for the MS/MSD pair, and the QAP does not specify that the
MS/MSD pair be prepared on DUSA samples only. Acceptance limits for MS/MSDs are
set by the laboratories. The review of the information provided by the laboratories in the
data packages verified that the QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each
analytical batch was met. While the QAP does not require it, the recoveries were
reviewed for compliance with the laboratory established acceptance limits. The QAP
does not require this level of review and the results of this review are provided for
information only.
The information from the Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all quarterly samples were within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab G.
The recoveries and RPDs which are outside of the laboratory established acceptance
limits do not affect the quality or usability of the data because the recoveries and RPDs
outside of the acceptance limits are indicative of matrix interference. Furthermore, the
quarterly VOC sample (CI1020352) spiked for the MS/MSD analyses were not collected
at the Mill, and as such the matrix interference is not applicable to the Mill samples
reported herein. The QAP requirement to analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical
batch was met and as such the data are compliant with the QAP.
The information from the Laboratory QNQC Summary Reports indicates that the
MS/MSDs recoveries and the associated RPDs for all accelerated samples were within
acceptable laboratory limits for all regulated compounds except as indicated in Tab G.
The percent recovery for the March monthly uranium sample in (CII030538) spiked for
the MS/MSD analyses was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater
than 4 times the spiking level added to the sample. The sample that was spiked for the
MS/MSD pair was not collected at the Mill, and the high level of uranium reported in the
sample is not applicable to the Mill samples reported herein. The QAP requirement to
analyze a MS/MSD pair with each analytical batch was met and as such the data are
compliant with the QAP.
The QAP specifies that surrogate compounds shall be employed for all organic analyses
but the QAP does not specify acceptance limits for surrogate recoveries. The analytical
data associated with the quarterly and accelerated sampling met the requirement specified
14
N:lRequired ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 II Q 1120 11_ Q 1_ GW _Report text.doc
in the QAP. The infonnation from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates
that the surrogate recoveries for all quarterly samples were within acceptable laboratory
limits for all surrogate compounds except as indicated in Tab G. In all instances the
surrogate recoveries outside of acceptance limits were above the upper limit or had a high
recovery, indicating a high bias to the individual sample results. A high bias means that
reported results for this analyte will tend to be higher than the actual concentration.
There is no effect on the quality or usability of the data because there are multiple
surrogates added to each sample and all other surrogates were within limits. Furthennore,
there are no QAP requirements for surrogate recoveries. Since surrogate compounds
were added to all of the organic analyses as required by the QAP, the data are compliant
with the QAP requirements.
The infonnation from the Laboratory QAlQC Summary Reports indicates that the LCS
recoveries for both the quarterly and accelerated samples were within acceptable
laboratory limits for all LCS compounds.
The QAP Section 8.1.2 requires that each analytical batch shall be accompanied by a
reagent blank. All analytical batches routinely contain a blank, which is a laboratory-
grade water sample made and carried through all analytical steps. Reagent blanks are
blanks created post sample preparation and are applicable only to samples which do not
undergo an analytical preparation step such as digestion or extraction. For the Mill
samples, a method blank is prepared for all analytical methods, but reagent blanks are
created only for the metals samples. Per the approved QAP, contamination detected in
analysis of reagent blanks (and method blanks) will be used to evaluate any analytical
laboratory contamination of environmental samples. The QAP does not specify the
process for evaluation of reagent or method blanks. For consistency, the QAP required
evaluation criteria for rinsate blanks will be used. The QAP criteria for rinsate blanks
states that nonconfonnance will exist when blanks are within an order of magnitude of
the sample results. Twenty-six analytes in the quarterly samples and two analytes in the
accelerated samples were reported in either the method blanks or reagent blanks from EL.
Method and reagent blank results are included in Tab E. In all cases the positive sample
results were more than an order of magnitude greater than the reagent/method blanks
results. The detections noted for the reagent/method blanks are lower than the reporting
limits specified in the QAP except for bicarbonate, sodium and sulfate which were
reported at or above the QAP required RLs. In the case of bicarbonate, sodium and
sulfate the sample results were several orders of magnitude above the method/reagent
blank detections and therefore had no affect on the usability of the data. The low level
detections in the method/reagent blank samples have no affect on the quality or usability
of the data. The method/reagent blank samples which had detections at or above the
QAP required RL also had no affect on the quality or usability of the data due to the
levels of detections in the samples which were significantly higher than the
method/reagent blank results. Additionally, blank detections are indicative of a false
positive or high bias to the sample results as the laboratory contribution to the results
would likely cause higher sample results. The QAP requirement to analyze a
method/reagent blank with each batch and evaluate the results has been completed as
required.
15
N :\Required ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 11 Q 1120 11_ Q 1_ GW _Report text.doc
4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Necessary corrective actions identified during the current monitoring period are described
below, in accordance with Part I.F.l.e of the GWDP.
The corrective action for nitrate detections reported in the rinsate blanks is discussed in
the nitrate and chloroform reports for the first quarter 2011. The nitrate levels in the
rinsate blanks is not discussed below because Denison plan to address this issue with the
installation ofa dedicated pump in MW-35, which is the only groundwater well that was
previously sampled with a portable pump, (with the prior approval of the Executive
Secretary in accordance with Part I.E. 11 of the GWDP) that is, there will no longer be
any groundwater wells that use a portable pump and would therefore require a rinsate
blank sample. Because a dedicated pump will be installed in MW-35, the corrective
action for the groundwater program will be complete when the pump is installed. If
future sampling with a portable pump is necessary, rinsate blanks will be collected and
assessed as necessary.
4.1 Identification and Defmition of the Problem
Denison's management review of groundwater QAlQC identified an error in the checking
spreadsheet for field pH. Correction of the spreadsheet resulted in corrections to some
field pH entries reported in the Exceedance Notices for Ql through Q4, 2010. No other
analytes were affected. As described in Section 3.3 and in the May 13, 2011 Exceedance
Notice, field pH corrections resulted in some samples being reported as exceedances
when they were not; some samples not being reported as exceedance; and some samples
retaining the same compliance status. The corrected spreadsheet identified one
additional well to be sampled for field pH. The field pH in MW-29 was outside
compliance limits in the fourth quarter. The spreadsheet error and changed pH entry was
identified in second quarter 2011and accelerated field pH sampling was initiated in April
2011 during the second quarter. However,it should be noted that per Denison's letter to
UDEQ of January 31,2011, GWCLs for pH are under re-evaluation and proposed revised
GWCLs will be submitted to UDEQ on or before June 30, 2011. Any pH exceedance
reported in previous exceedance tables for first through fourth quarter 2010, or in the
corrected table in the May 13, 2011 Exceedance Notice, may no longer be an actual
exceedance following implementation of new GWCLs.
Rinsate Blank Detections
DI water used for decontamination does not show the presence of nitrate; however, low
level nitrate was reported
4.2 Assignment of Responsibility for Investigating the Problem
The problems have been investigated by the QA Manager.
4.3 Investigation and Determination of Cause of the Problem
16
N :\Required ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 11 Q 1120 1 1_ Q 1_ G W _Report te<t,doc
The corrections to the field pH values were the result of a spreadsheet error which caused
the incorrect reporting of several field pH values in Q1 through Q4 2010.
4.4 Determination of a Corrective Action to Eliminate the Problem
All spreadsheets used for data checking have been verified. Additional staff are being
trained to review data management tools and verify entries.
4.5 Assigning and Accepting Responsibility for Implementing the Corrective
Action
It will be the responsibility of the Director, Compliance and Permitting to implement this
corrective action.
4.6 Implementing the Corrective Action and Evaluating Effectiveness
The corrective action described above is complete. The data management spreadsheets
have been verified and all field pH data have been corrected. Additional verification will
be conducted quarterly.
4.7 Verifying That the Corrective Action Has Eliminated the Problem
Verification is complete. The corrected values are currently reflected in the data
management tools in use. Additional verification will be conducted quarterly to assure
that the spreadsheets accurately reflect the reported values.
4.8 Assessment of Corrective Actions from Previous Period
The previous Groundwater Monitoring Report (DUSA February 28,2011) specified two
corrective actions. The first corrective action was to correct rinsate blank collection
procedures and the second was the result of an accelerated monitoring frequency
omission. The effectiveness ofthose corrective actions is discussed below.
The fourth quarter 2010 quarterly groundwater report noted that:
"Rinsate blank collection procedures were not followed as required. An
additional rinsate blank should have been collected on the second day the portable
pump was used for sampling. A DIFB while not required by the approved QAP,
should be collected when DI water is used to collect rinsate blank samples to
verify that the DI water is not the source of contamination during the rinsate blank
sampling process."
During the first quarter 2011, the rinsate collection procedure was followed as required
and the appropriate number of rinsate blanks was collected. A DIFB was also collected.
Additionally, a corrective action to install a dedicated pump in MW-35 prior to the end of
the second quarter 2011 was noted. The installation of the dedicated pump will be
17
N :\Required ReportslGroundwater Quarterly Monitoring Report120 II Q 1120 11_ Q ,_ GW _Report text.doc
completed upon receipt of Executive Secretary approval. After installation of the
dedicated pump, rinsate blanks will no longer be required under the groundwater
sampling program and as such this corrective action will be considered complete.
The fourth quarter 2010 quarterly groundwater report noted that "The additional analytes
for the monthly accelerated program identified during the third quarter 2010 were
inadvertently omitted from the December monthly sampling due to the lateness of the
laboratory submission of the data from the third quarter sampling event." The omission
of the analytes from the December monthly event prompted the QA Manager to revise
the exceedance tracking procedures, and review frequency and procedures for the
analytical data received from the laboratory. Additional staff were trained and used to
review data against the GWCLs which resulted in a quicker processing time and
additional reviews of the requirements. The monthly accelerated program conducted in
March 2011, included all analytes scheduled to be sampled in March as specified in the
corrective action. No further corrective action is required.
5.0 TIME CONCENTRATION PLOTS
Time concentration plots for each monitoring well for the following constituents:
chloride, fluoride, sulfate, and uranium, are included under Tab I.
6.0 ELECTRONIC DATA FILES AND FORMAT
DUSA has provided to the Executive Secretary electronic copies of all laboratory results
from groundwater quality monitoring conducted during the quarter in Comma Separated
Values ("CSV"), from the EL data; and in Electronic Data Deliverable ("EDD") format
from the A W AL data. A copy of the transmittal e-mail is included under Tab J.
18
N :\Required ReportslOroundw.ter Quarterly Monitoring Report\20 11 Q 1 \20 11_ Q I_OW _Report text.doc
7.0 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION
This document was prepared by Denison Mines (USA) Corp. on May 27, 2011.
(USA) CORP.
By:
. Fryde und
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Counsel
19
Certification:
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments Were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my owle e and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are
significant nalti for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
nt fo owing violations.
Dav' Fryd lund
Vic President, Regulatory Affairs and Counsel
Denison M'mes (USA) Cotp.
20
Tables
Table I: Summary of Well Sampling for the Period
Purpose for sampling
Well Normal Frequency this quarter Sample Date Date of Lab Report
Quarterly Samples
MW-II Quarterly Quarterly 2/2/20 II 3110/2011 (21712011)
MW-14 Quarterly Quarterly 21712011 3/15/2011 (2/17/2011)
MW-20 Quarterly Background* 2116/2011 3/24/20 II (2/22120 II)
MW-22 Quarterly Background* 2/8/2011 3115/2011 (2117/20 ll)
MW-25 Quarterly Quarterly 2/2/2011 311 0/20 II (217120 II )
MW-26 Quarterly Quarterly 2/16/2011 3/24/20 II (2/22/20 11)
MW-30 Quarterly Quarterly 2/112011 3/10/20 II (217120 II )
MW-31 Quarterly Quarterly 2/1/2011 311 0/20 II (217120 II )
MW-33 Quarterly Quarterly· Dry Dry
MW-34 Quarterly Quarterly* 2116/2011 3124/20 II (2122120 II)
MW-35 Quarterly Quarterly 2115/2011 3124/20 II (2/22/2011)
MW-35R I per day** Rinsate of MW-35 2114/2011 3/24/20 II (2/22/20 11)
MW-60 I per sample period or Field Blank 2116/2011 3/24/2011 (2/2212011)
MW-65 I per Batch Duplicate of MW -22 2/8/2011 3/15/2011 (2117/2011)
Accelerated Samples
Accelerated Quarterly Samples
MW-2 Semi-annually Accelerated 211412011 3/24/2011
MW-3 Semi-annually Accelerated 2/1512011 3/24/2011
MW-3A Semi-annually Accelerated 2/16/2011 3 124/20 II
MW-5 Semi-annually Accelerated 2/14/2011 3/24/2011
MW-12 Semi-annually Accelerated 2/15/2011 3/24/2011
MW-18 Semi-annually Accelerated 211512011 3/24/2011
MW-19 Semi-annually Accelerated 2/2112011 Field pH -2/21/2011
MW-23 Semi-annually Accelerated 2/912011 Field pH -2/9/2011
MW-24 Semi-annually Accelerated 2110/2011 3115/2011
MW-27 Semi-annually Accelerated 2/912011 3115/2011
MW-28 Semi-annually Accelerated 2114/2011 3/24/2011
MW-32 Semi-annually Accelerated 2/9/2011 3/15/2011
MW-70 I per Batch Duplicate of MW -18 2115/2011 3/24/2011
Accelerated January Monthly
MW-II Monthly Accelerated 1111/2011 2/1/2011 (1120/2011)
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 111112011 Field pH -IIll/20ll
MW-25 Monthly Accelerated 111112011 211120 II
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 1112/2011 2/112011
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 1110/2011 2/1/2011
MW-31 Monthly Accelerated 1110/2011 2/1/2011
MW-65 Monthly Duplicate ofMW-25 111112011 21112011
Accelerated March Monthly
MW-II Monthly Accelerated 3115/2011 4/14/2011 (3/15/20 II)
MW-14 Monthly Accelerated 311412011 Field pH -3/14/2011
MW-25 Monthly Accelerated 311512011 4114/2011
MW-26 Monthly Accelerated 3115/2011 4/14/2011
MW-30 Monthly Accelerated 3/14/2011 411412011
MW-31 Monthly Accelerated 3114/2011 4/14/2011
MW-65 I per Batch Duplicate of MW-25 3/15/2011 4/14/2011
Notes:
Date in parenthesis depicts the date that tetrahydrofuran was reported from American West Analytical Laboratories.
All other constituents were reported from Energy Laboratories .
• These wells were sampled either prior to or shortly after the revised GWDP was issued on February (5, 20 II. In all cases the status
of these wells and the requirements to sample them were changed in the February 15, 2011 GWDP. The data are included for
information purposes only. The purpose for sampling listed in the above table reflects the purpose from the previous GWDP.
** llinsates are collected at a freequency of I per day when dedicated sampling equipment is not used.
Table 2 -Exceedances and Acceleration Requirements
Monitoring Wen GWCLin liirst Rcsult Routine nmplo Acceleraled Exc«dnnce tRrt o(·At'c.lernled Constituent Exceeding GWCL E cc.dlltg,lbc (Water Class) Current GWDP C;WeL Frcyuoney Fi'cfJuancy Samplel'crlod Monltorl,!,!:
Qun\1crly W.I" A ••• lcralc\1 to Monthly Silmpllnlll
MW-II (Class II) Manganese (uglL) 131.29 134 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010
Tetrahydrofuran (uglL) 11.5 12 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010·
MW-14 (Class III) Field pH (S.U) 6.5 -8.5 6.4S Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010
MW-25 (Class III) Uranium (uglL) 6.5 6.57 Quarterly Monthly Q32010 Janunry 2011··
Bald aft ($;UJ 6,5 .8.5 6.36 QuWrIy MOIUh1Y QUOIO 1amJIny·2011
MW-26 (Class Ill) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) (mglL) 0.62 1.3 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010
Uranium (uglL) 41.8 58.7 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May2010
Chloroform (uglL) 70 700 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010
Chloride (mglL) 58.31 72 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010
Methylene Chloride (uglL) 5 9.9 Quarterly Monthly Q22010 June 2010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 6.59 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010
TDS(mglL) 3284.19 3440 Quarterly Monthly Q32010 January 20 II·
MW-30 (Class II) Nitrate + Nitrite Cas N) (mglL) 2.5 16.1 Quarterly Monthly QI2010 May 2010
Chloride (mglL) 128 134 Quarterly Monthly QI2011 May 2011
Selenium (ugIL) 34 35.3 Quarterly Monthly Q22010 July 2010
MW-31 (Class III) Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) (mglL) 5 21.7 Quarterly Monthly Ql2010 May 2010
TOS(mglL) 1320 1330 Quarterly Monthly Q32010 January 2011··
Sulfate (mgIL) 532 539 Quarterly Monthly Q42010 March 2011
Chloride (mg/L) [43 145 Quarterly Month[y QI2011 Mliy2011
Semi-Annual WeDs Accelerated to Quarterly SamJ>linJl'
Monitoring Well GWCLln FlrslRcsult Sample Accelerated Exe •• dance Start of Accelerated
(Water Class) Constituent Exceeding GWCL Current GWDP ExccedJng Ihe, Frequency Frequency I Sample Period Monitoring GWCL
MW-2 (Class III) Gross Alpha minus Rn & U (PCilL) 3.2 3.5 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q42010 Ql20ll
MW-3 (Class III) Selenium (uglL) 37 37.2 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.14 (6.25) Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Fluoride CmglL) 0.68 0.71 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-3A (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5·8.5 6.23 (6.24) Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Sulfate (mglL) 3640 3680 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
TOS CmglL) 5805 5860 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Selenium (uglL) 89 94.8 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q42010 QI2011
MW-5 (Class II) Uranium (uglL) 7.5 11.6 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q42010 012011
Semi-Annual WeUs Accelerated to Quarterly Sampliog'
MonitOring Well GWCLio First Result S~mple Accelerated Exeeedance Start of Accelerated Constituent ExceedIng GWCL E ~ccdlng Ihe (Water Class) Current GWDP GWCL. Frequency Frequency Sample Period Monitoring
MW-12 (Class Ill) ~pH(S;U.)' 6;S.8;S 6.41 ~Annuallr ~ Q4.2010 Qj 20) 1
Selenium (ugll,) 25 25.7 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-18 (Class III) Thallium (uglL) 1.95 3.73 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Sulfate (mglL) 1938.9 1950 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 6.2 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
TOS (mglL) 3198.77 3280 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-19 (Class III) Field pH (S.U) 6.78-8.5 6.61 (6.66) Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-23 (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 6.18 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-24 (Class Ill) Cadmium (uglL) 2.5 4.28 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Thallium (uglL) I I.3 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U,) 6.5 -8.5 5.91 (5.78) Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-27 (Class Ill) Nitrate + Nitrite Cas NJ (mglL) 5,6 5.8 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Chloride CmglL) 38 42 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 QJ 2010
Sulfate (mglL) 462 469 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
TDS(mglL) 1075 1160 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW-28 (Class III) Chloride (mglL) 105 108 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field pl I (S. U.l 6.1 -8.5 5.67 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
MW·29 (ct.IU) field pH (S.U.) 6A6-8.s 6.17 ScmI·Ann\lalIY QIIaJUtIy 042010 022011
MW-32 (Class III) Gross Alpba minus Rn & U (PCilL) 3.33 5.4 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5 6.03 Semi-Annually Quarterly Q22010 Q32010
Notes:
I GWCL Values are taken from June 21, 2010 and February 15,2011 versions of the GWDP in whicb the GWCL table has not been changed.
• THF bas not reported an exceedance since Q I 20 I 0 and has had 10 consecutive monotiring results below the GWCL. UDEQ requires continued monitoring of this constituent.
Table 3 -GWCL Exceedances for First Quarter 2011 under the February 15,2011 GWDP
Ql Results1 Q2 Results Q3 Results Q4 Results
Monitoring GWCLin Ql Q2 May May June June July July August August Q3 October October Q4 December December
Well (Water Constituent Exceeding Jun 17,2010 Sample Ql Result Sample Q2 Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Sample Q3 Monthly Monthly Sample Q4 Result Monthly Monthly
Class) GWCL GWDP Date Date Result Sample Result Sample Result Sample Result Sample Result Date Result Sample Result Date Sample Result Date Date Date Date Date Date
Required Quarterly Sampling Wells
MW-ll Manganese (uglL) 131.29 2/10110 134 4/28110 137 5/24110 122 6116/10 99 7/20110 123 8/25/10 138 9/8/10 128 10/20/10 141 1111 1110 133 12115110 158
(Class I£) Tetrahydrofuran (ug/L) 11.5 2/1 0/10 12 4/28/10 5.2 5/2411 0 <l.0 6/16110 <1.0 7/27/10 2.17 8/25/10 <1.0 9/8/10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
MW-14 Field pH (S.u.) 6.5 -8.5 2/2110 (Class III) 6.45 4/21110 6.29 5/21 /10 6.36 6/16/10 6.45 7/20/10 7.19 8/25/10 6.48 9/8/10 6.51 10/20110 6.60 11/10/10 6.37 12/1511 0 6.47
MW-25 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 - 8.5 6.53 7.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.58 NS NA 1111011 0 6.36 NS NA
III) 2/26/2010 4/28/2010 9/8/2010 Uranium 6.5 5.93 6.43 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.57 NS NA 5.89 NS NA
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.62 1.3 2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.4 CmglL)
Uranium (ug/L) 41.8 58.7 66.7 37.4 36.6 34.4 71.8 72.7 37.5 30.4 29.6
Chloroform (ug/L) 70 700 1700 800 940 900 2800 2100 1000 1900 1400
Chloride (mg/L) 58.31 72 57 80 47 52 49 64 52 48 52
MW-26 Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 2/2/10 6.59 4/22/10 7.18 5/21 /10 6.36 6.98 6.45 6.39 6.60 6.61 6.49 12/15/10 6.45
(Class III) Dichloromethane 6116110 7/21/10 8116110 9/26/10 10/20110 11/15110
(Methylene Chloride) 5 1 9.9 NR 2.2 12 24 45 5.5 16 1.2
(uglL)
TDS CmglL) 3284.19 3100 3280 NS NS NS NS 3440 NS 3140 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 4.69 2.4 0.6 NS NS NS NS 2.5 NS 6.4 NS U (pCi/L)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.5 16.1 15.8 17 15.3 7/21110 16 8/24110 16 15 15 15 16 MW-30 CmgIL)
(Class II) Chloride CmglL) 128 2/9/10 127 4/27/10 97 5/21/10 NS 6/15/10 NS NS NS NS NS 9/1 5/10 111 10/19/10 NS I I/9/10 126 1211411 0 NS
Selenium (ug/L) 34 32 35.3 NS NS 7/27/10 33.5 8/24110 35.6 32.6 32.4 32.2 30.5
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5 21.7 22.5 5/21/10 23 6/15/10 21.1 7/21110 20 8/24110 22 21 1011911 0 20 20 20 CmglL) MW-31 TDS (mglL)' 1320 2/9/10 1150 4/20/10 1220 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 1330 NS NA 1320 12/14/10 NS (Class III) 9/13/10 11/9/10
Chloride CmglL) 143 128 128 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 139 NS NA 138 NS
Sulfate (mg/L) 532 507 522 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 527 NS NA 539 NS
Required Semi-Annual Sampling Wells
MW-2 (Class Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.2 NS NA l.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3.5 NS NA III) U (pC ilL)
MW-3 (Class Selenium (uglL) 37 NS NA 37.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 35.5 NS NA 38.8 NS NA
6.14 III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 5/3110 (6.25) NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/20110 6.39 NS NA 11/19/10 6.35 NS NA
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.68 NS NA 0.71 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 0.63 NS NA 0.77 NS NA
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.23 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.42 NS NA 6.21 NS NA MW-3A (6.24)
(Class III) Sulfate (mglL) 3640 NS NA 5/4/10 3680 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/21110 3630 NS NA 11122110 3850 NS NA
TDS Cmg/L) 5805 NS NA 5860 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 5470 NS NA 5330 NS NA
Selenium (ugIL) 89 NS NA 81.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NS NA 94.8 NS NA
MW-5 (Class Uranium (uglL) 7.5 NS NA 4/26/10 0.39 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 11/11/10 11.6 NS NA II)
MW-12 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 7.16 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.62 NS NA 6.47 NS NA
(Class III) Selenium (ug/L) 25 4/27110 9/20/10 11/19110 NS NA 25.7 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 31.9 NS NA 27.6 NS NA
MW-18 Thallium (ug/I) 1.95 NS NA 3.73 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3.64 NS NA 3.57 NS NA
(Class III) Sulfate CroglL) 1938.9 NS NA 5/4110 1950 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9115/1 0 1930 NS NA 11118/10 1910 NS NA
Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 NS NA 6.2 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 7.23 NS NA 6.37 NS NA
TDS (mg/L) 3198.77 NS NA 3280 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 3190 NS NA 3030 NS NA
Q1 Results Q2 Results Q3 Results Q4 Results
Monitoring GWCLin Ql Q2 May May June June July July August August Q3 October October Q4
Well (Water Constituent Exceeding Current Sample Ql Result Sample Q2 Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Sample Q3 Monthly Monthly Sample Q4 Result GWCL Result Sample Sample Sample Sample Result Sample Class) GWDP Date Date Result Result Result Result Date Result Date Date Date Date Date Date
Required Semi-Annual Sampling Wells, continued
MW-19
(Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5 NS
MW-23 Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS _(Class III)
MW-24 Cadmium (ug/L) 2.5 NS
(Class III) Thallium (uglL) 1 NS
Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5.6 NS (mglL)
MW-27 Chloride (mg/L) 38 NS
(Class III) Sulfate (mglL) 462 NS
TDS (mglL) 1075 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 2 NS U (pCilL)
MW-28 Chloride (mg/L) 105 NS
(Class llJ) Field pH (S.U.) 6.1 -8.5 NS
MW-29
(Class III)2 Field pH (S.U.) 6.46 -8.5 NS
MW-32 Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.33 NS
(Class III) U (pCi/L)
Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5 NS
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from February 15,2011 version of GWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
NA 5/4/10
NA 4/22/10
NA
NA 5/6/1 0
NA
NA
NA
NA 5/3110
NA
NA
NA
NA 4/19/10
NA 4/27/10
NA 4/20/10
NA
6.61 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/15/10 6.93 (6.66)
6.18 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/14/10 7.05
4.28 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 5.06
1.3 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/21/10 1.57
5.91 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.64 (5.78)
5.8 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 5.9
42 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 42
469 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/14/10 461
1160 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 1060
1.6 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NA
108 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 106 9/14/10 5.67 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 5.91
6.82 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA
5.4 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 9/13/10 2.9
6.03 NS NA NS NA NS NA NS NA 6.33
o Values shown in parentheses are results from resampling of the well during the same sample period. Wells were resampled due to a field or laboratory problem which is described in the report for that sampling period
NS NA 11118110 6.8
NS NA 11122/10 6.44
NS NA 3.22
NS NA 11117/10 1.09
NS NA 6.1
NS NA 5.7
NS NA 45
NS NA 11112/10 452
NS NA 1110
NS NA 2.4
NS NA 11112/1 0 107
NS NA 5.72
NS NA 11/9/1 0 6.17
NS NA 11/10/10 8.8
NS NA 6.05
1. Denison's management review of groundwater QAlQC identified an error in the checking spreadsheet for field pH. Correction of the spreadsheet resulted in corrections to some field pH entries in Q 1 through Q4, 2010. No other analytes were affected.
Fourteen of the corrected pH values remained within compliance limits and have no effect on the above table. Ten pH values in five wells which were not previously reported as exceedances have been identifed as exceedances in the
corrected table. All five wells were already in accelerated monitoring status. Seven pH values in five wells which were incorrectly reported as exceedances have been identifed in the corrected table as being in compliance.
The remainder of pH values in all wells for the 4 quarters were either unchanged or did not result in a change of complaince status after the corrections.
It should be noted that per Denison's letter to DEQ of January 31,2011, GWCLs for pH are under re-evaluation and proposed revised GWCLs will be submitted to DEQ on or before June 30, 2011.
Any pH exceedance reported in previous exceedance tables for Q1 through Q4, 2010, or the corrected table above, may no longer be an actual exceedance following implementation of new GWCLs.
2. Based on the corrected spreadsheet results, pH in MW29 was outside compliance limits in Q4 and accelerated (quarterly) sampling should have begun in Ql, 2011. However, the spreadsheet error and changed pH entry was not identified until Q2 2011.
The well is currently on accelerated status.
December December Monthly Monthly Sample Result Date
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
NS NA
Ql 2011 Results
GWCLin January January March 2011
Monitoring Well Constituent Exceeding Jun 17, 2011 2011 Q12011 Q12011 Monthly March 2011 Sample
(Water Class) GWCL 2010 Monthly Monthly Sample Result Sample Monthly Frequency
GWDP Sample Sample Date Date Result
Date Result
MW -11 (Class II) Manganese (ug/L) 131.29 1111111 121 2/2111 145 3115/11 68 Quarterly
Tetrahydrofuran (ug/L) 11.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Quarterly
MW-14 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 1111111 6.37 217111 6.22 3114111 6.76 Quarterly III)
MW-25 (Class lIT) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 1111111 6.44 2/2111 6.66 3115/11 6.79 Quarterly
Uranium 6.5 7.02 4.77 6.8 Quarterly
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 0.62 0.2 0.25 0.6 Quarterly (mg/L)
Uranium (ug/L) 41.8 32 69.3 31.8 Quarterly
Chloroform (ug/L) 70 800 730 1200 Quarterly
Chloride (mg/L) 58.31 52 59 64 Quarterly
MW-26 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.74 -8.5 1112111 6.83 2116111 6.06 311 5/11 6.89 Quarterly
III) Dichloromethane
(Methylene Chloride) 5 <1.0 10 14 Quarterly
(ug/L)
TDS (mg/L) 3284.19 3100 3270 3140 Quarterly
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 4.69 NS 3 2.7 Quarterly U (pC ilL)
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.5 15 16 17 Quarterly (mg/L) MW-30 (Class II) Chloride (mg/L) 128 1110111 NS 211111 134 3114111 NS Quarterly
Selenium (ug/L) 34 36.2 34.7 34 Quarterly
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5 19 21 22 Quarterly (mg/L) MW-31 (Class TDS (mgIL) 1320 III 0111 1240 211111 1220 3/14/l1 1250 Quarterly III) Chloride (mg/L) 143 NS 145 NS Quarterly
Sulfate (mg/L) 532 NS 538 531 Quarterly
MW-2 (Class Ill) Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.2 NS NA 1.1 NS NA Semi-Annually U (pCi/L)
Selenium (ug/L) 37 NS NA 40.5 NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-3 (Class III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 2115111 6.09 NS NA Semi-Annually
Fluoride (Mg/L) 0.68 NS NA 0.69 NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-3A (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 6.05 NS NA Semi-Annually
III) Sulfate (mg/L) 3640 NS NA 2/l6111 3730 NS NA Semi-Annually
TDS (mg/L) 5805 NS NA 5770 NS NA Semi-Annually
Selenium (ug/L) 89 NS NA 99 NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-5 (Class II) Uranium (ug/L) 7.5 NS NA 2114111 29.5 NS NA Semi-Annually
MW-12 (Class Field pH (S.U.) 6.5 -8.5 NS NA 2/15111 6.43 NS NA Semi-Annually
III) Selenium (ug/L) 25 NS NA 39 NS NA Semi-Annually
Thallium (ug/l) 1.95 NS NA 3.49 NS NA Semi-Annually MW-18 (Class Sulfate (mg/L) 1938.9 NS NA 1770 NS NA Semi-Annually III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.25-8.5 NS NA 2115111 6.27 NS NA Semi-Annually
TDS (mg/L) 3198.77 NS NA 3250 NS NA Semi-Annually
January
Monitoring Well Constituent Exceeding GWCLin 2011
(Water Class) GWCL Current Monthly
GWDP Sample
Date
MW-19 (Class
III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.78-8.5 NS
MW-23 (Class Field pH (S.u.) 6.5 -8.5 NS III)
MW-24 (Class Cadmium (ug/L) 2.5 NS
Thallium (ug/L) 1 NS III)
Field pH (S.u.) 6.5 -8.5 NS
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 5.6 NS (mg/L)
MW-27 (Class Chloride (mg/L) 38 NS
III) Sulfate (mg/L) 462 NS
TDS (mg/L) 1075 NS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & 2 NS U (pC ilL)
MW-28 (Class Chloride (mg/L) 105 NS
III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.1 -8.5 NS
MW-29 (Class Field pH (S.u.) 6.46 -8.5 NS III)2
MW-32 (Class Gross Alpha minus Rn & 3.33 NS U (pCiIL) III) Field pH (S.U.) 6.4 -8.5 NS
Notes:
GWCL values are taken from February 15,2011 version ofGWDP.
NS = Not Required and Not Sampled
NR = Required and Not Reported
NA = Not Applicable
Exceedances are shown in yellow
Ql 2011 Results
January March 2011 2011 Q12011 Q12011 Monthly March 2011 Sample Monthly Sample Result Sample Monthly Frequency Sample Date Result
Result Date
NA 2/2112011 6.78 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 2/9/2011 6.13 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 1.78 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 2110/2011 1.41 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 5.73 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 6 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 46 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 2/9/2011 455 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 1090 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 0.7 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 2114/2011 114 NS NA Semi -Annually
NA 5.69 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA NS NA NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 2/9/2011 1.5 NS NA Semi-Annually
NA 5.99 NS NA Semi-Annually
o Values shown in parentheses are results from resampling of the well during the same sample period. Wells were resampled due to a field or laboratory problem which is described in the report for that sampling period
1. Denison's management review of groundwater QAlQC identified an error in the checking spreadsheet for field pH. Correction of the spreadsheet resulted in corrections to some field pH entries in Q 1 through Q4, 2010. No other analytes were affected.
Fourteen of the corrected pH values remained within compliance limits and have no effect on the above table. Ten pH values in five wells which were not previously reported as exceedances have been identifed as exceedances in the
corrected table. All five wells were already in accelerated monitoring status. Seven pH values in five wells which were incorrectly reported as exceedances have been identifed in the corrected table as being in compliance.
The remainder of pH values in all wells for the 4 quarters were either unchanged or did not result in a change of complaince status after the corrections.
It should be noted that per Denison's letter to DEQ of January 31, 2011, GWCLs for pH are under re-evaluation and proposed revised GWCLs will be submitted to DEQ on or before June 30, 2011.
Any pH exceedance reported in previous exceedance tables for Q1 through Q4, 2010, or the corrected table above, may no longer be an actual exceedance following implementation of new GWCLs.
2. Based on the corrected spreadsheet results, pH in MW29 was outside compliance limits in Q4 and accelerated (quarterly) sampling should have begun in Ql, 2011. However, the spreadsheet error and changed pH entry was not identified until Q2 2011.
The well is currently on accelerated status.
INDEX OF TABS
Tab A Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
Tab B Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Tab C Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
Tab C1 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, January 2011
Tab C2 Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring, March 2011
Tab D Quarterly Depth to Water
Tab E Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
Tab F Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
Tab Fl Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring, January 2011
Tab F2 Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring, March 2011
Tab G Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-1NB
G-2
G-3NB
G-4NB
G-5
G-6NB
G-7NB
G-8NB
G-9NB
G-I0
Field Data QNQC Evaluation
Holding Time Evaluation
Laboratory Temperature Check
Analytical Method Check
Reporting Limit Evaluation
Trip Blank Evaluation
QNQC Evaluation for Sample Duplicates
Radiologies Counting Error
Laboratory Matrix QC
Rinsate Blank Detections
Tab H Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
Tab I Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
Tab J CSV Transmittal Letter
Tab A
Site Plan and Perched Well Locations White Mesa Site
l' jJ r(
II
r"
.,,:;;~
#'7 I!.,f
II '
" II
II /I
~ //..-" ~~I ~=~-
"
,I
"
"
,I
~: 32
I'
['
II
,I
II
II
II
II
II
I
• M~.21
II
II
II
\\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~--
0
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANATIQN
MW-20 • perched monitoring well
TW4-19
0 temporary perched monitoring well
PIEZ-1 perched piezometer Ii
TWN-1 temporary perched nitrate <> monitoring well
TW4-26 temporary perched monitoring well ~ installed May, 2010
MW-34 perched monitoring well installed -<>-August/September, 2010
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
\\
\\
\\
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
~
MW-01 •
~S
~ ..
o TWN-7
MW-02 •
Mw-hs -9-1
I
1/
II
(( --:::
~3 h MW-- _ MW-34 M~--9--9-__ •
MW-03 •
MW-20 •
CELL NO.1
CELL NO.2
MW-17 •
33
MW-18 •
o TWN-18
o
TWN-3
o TWN-6
o TWN-8
o TWN-1S
o TWN-10
o TWN-9
PIEZ-1 ..
MW-19 •
".4f
PIEZ-3 ..
OTW4-1fbTW4-11 OTW4-13
QlW.4~ TW4-7~a-8
OTW4-1
TW4-23 o
OTW4-40TW4_14
OTW4-6
*TW4-26
o
TWN-11
o TWN-14
PIEZ-4 .. ,6'/k"::::::--=--=-.:='=--=-
~7 /7
* PIEZ-S
"
T37S
T38S
.. ,
......... -
,
\"''-J #~===~ 4-======~~~~~7/ ';:: ~ --=..-=.. -=.. -=.. I ~~ 4' II-
...... ~ .....:;,..-::::.-
3000
f wildlife pond
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM, INC. APPROVED
SJS
MW-22 • /1
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
SITE PLAN
AND PERCHED WELL LOCATIONS
WHITE MESA SITE
DATE I REFERENCE
Ql 2011 H:1718000/may11/welloc10.srf
~ ~
Cl
(
~
"
FIGURE
A-I
TabB
Field Data Worksheets Quarterly Sampling
Mill· G~ounc;lwater Discharge Permit ) Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
• Groundwater Monhoring Quality Assurance Plan (CAP)
)
I
!
I
OENI50J)~~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
. .., See instruct ion
MINIiS FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUl\"I) WATER
Description of Sampling Event: ! f ~I 0\1.&.\ t ~r Crrl>\MtA Wat-e.r ;tC.1I
Sampler Name
Location (well name):! MW-2. and initials: ! -r.,(lI'lU Ho ll :tA({~/"f 11
Date and Time for PurgingJ ~ :l.11t.f /4blll and Sampling (if different) L.....,;;/V'.:.,./.;..LA"--_____ ......
Well Purging Equip Used: ~ pump o@bailerWellPump(ifotherthan Bermet) I.,.......;Q~t:_O ____ __J
Sampling Event I QWhr \s.rI, &\0 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL..-M_W_,_.?_3 ____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 ~.O
Specific Conductanccl.-I _'l'-'s ... q __ -->II-lMHOSI cm Well Dcpth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before Purging/ Ie q T) Casing Volume (V) 4" well:\ ):;l...t.l1:> \(.653b)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--~-----'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) Co.76
Well Water Temp. (avg) I i 3.Li1 Redox Potential (Eh)lt.. ..:..;13:::....'1""--_ ...... .1 Turbjdityl,-~c~_ ......
Weather Cond. Ext" Amb. Temp, °C {prior sampling event)1 -3\
Time I Oq~ I GaL Purged I 2'1. ~) I Time I 0'l:1'" I Gal. Purged I ~. II I
Conductance 136~ I pHI b b'l I Conductance I :Y~~ I pH I b·68' I
Temp.oC I ).:) '-\1 I Temp. DC I 13 . '::ih I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I Ij:J, I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I i (i I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I o ttY7 I Gal. Purged I 2.S .';> 8' I Time I Oll'~ I Gal. Purged I 9lS . be, I
Conductance I ~!:i9 I pH I 6 70 I Conductance 1 .3~~g I pH 1613 I
Temp. DC I 13,Y~ I Temp. DC I I\."I ~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ,~~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 1~'Z I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet lor Groundwater -" 1 012 capturx' CO"~"TIIC! WITH/"'_tfr-'UNCT'O .... LITY
MIIl-G.r,ourviwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
• Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ;>"~.DL\
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = 1-1 ...;.t' 6;.;..\ ...... 1 __ ---1
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V IQ = 1 II Y ,7 1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lobt1.....:.~....;/.:...;.I.\-=--_____ -J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sam pic if other than as Type Added
y N specified below) Y N Y N
VOCs 0 0 3)t40 mJ 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 lOOml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 'P' .... 250 ml l&-n HN03 mr 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 NoPreserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha I ~~ -EI 1,000 ml ~Im .n HN03 ~& -U
Other (specify) Jig--0 Sample volume 0 FWI 0 -riI -
~ ffprcscrvativc is used, specifY
Type and Quantity of
Prescr\'atiYe:
-Comment
~ .. See instruction
'"
Ar r'\J~c). ()" ~1c.. ,J 07:51.\ -r~Ylt'l<.r'" Hol\.4~,\pr<,scflt ·r~(' FV.(~<!.. a.11'\ ~A/'np /.V -e ven t.
PIAf'~e. b~o.~ ~t ollie · -p~~ed. We\1 'tel" ~ +O.{",1 0+ }.;.7.0 Jvllnc.A+~.
w,,\, ...... wo-~ fY\o.sJ.l~ d.::ur t~ro~h6.....\ fU,(j<' fu.\j c." e.nAC!J. qn4 S.afYIf 1< Wqj c:oll~c.J~ <i}-
O'i'io &rthS 41f~1\ wa.~ ~h< 0/'1 b ~""'pk <c.lle!:tc:d. O~p~l. ·ft. L..X.:h:r c..~,.. pLAr~L
vJo\,~ ll&5C Le.\'.\-~I~k 0..-+ OqYb
L--_______ ---I]Oo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worhheet for Groundwater .A 20f2 capturx' COM.ATIBLE WITH,;""'-,-w-rUNCTIOHALITY
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Attachment 1
~ See instruction OENISONI) ~
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I l!'T Qv.o..rtu" &f'Ov..fl~ Wu-~e.( ;10 II
Sampler Name
Location (well name): .... I_......;M......;\.IJ_-_3'--________ ~ and initials: I ....,-o.nl'lc:r l-Jo J1;J~ .!:l!rJt
Date and Time for Purgin~ ;}../ IS / ;2.011
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event Q ",o.f'*-e..r'~ (,-vJ
pH Buffer 7.0 -,.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _q......;'l...;q ___ ...JIIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ Z3 . .30
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) 1L...:~_/)J~ _____ -1
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) ,-I ......;Q..:...;m-=-____ --'
I MW"3}} Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... _______ ---1
pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): , Q7.0 0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well :~-.=---:;:-1) =---iI(.653h)
3" Well: . .s. O~ .(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I H .~~ Redox Potential (Eh) I ::L~S Turbidity ''----'=0=-_-'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I -::2. 6e.
Time I }O30 I Gal. Purged I 'l.3b I Time I 10,31 I Gal. Purged I 4..5 "-I
Conductance I :S{S3~ I pH I G,·II I Conductance I S8'34 I pH I ~_O'l I
Temp.oC 1 14.3'\ I Temp.oC I lQ.3:.J.... I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ~qq I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ;;rzf.3 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I 103..£-I Gal. Purged I ~.]1 I Time 11033 I Gal. Purged I <f. '1 [( I
Conductance I S '333 I pHI &,O'g 1 Conductance I 583L5 I pHI 15 .~~ I
Temp.oC I )!1.d..g I Temp.oC 11Q·39 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .;l.~3 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ;rq;;J. I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I '0. LJ D gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . :;tD~
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I Qg.34 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,-_M_'/A _______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals "KI 0 250ml '£] 0 HN03 "tl 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 19 0 Sample volume 0 IE 0 ~
t='O~f;a~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
r, See instruction
Comment
Arl":\ld 0'1' s:+e. 0\+ ot;40. \ ... nn~( Hl>n;~~~ ?r~f\+ ,*'or p\llr~-=. 6.(l J. .so.mf)'l~ -e"en+. F"'r~.e.. b-e~6.fI 0..+ O'lt.tS.
Pur~(:a. 'N ell ~Qr ~ -tb-t~1 cR ~Q t--\\(lv\te.~. W6"t-ct' \.)~ G\~/).... +~r bU~O"'-1-p \)..('~~.
? \A(~(. ~nJ ~ Ck"'~ 5~ YY\ P l~.) v::> e re Loll t: ch~o. 0..1-I 03,S.
'O cp+~ ·h, V-:)""t-Gl o...\\-~(' r"'r~e. ~o..~ ~7.~O
L~~ ~~tc. O-.~ \0'11
'--_______ ---'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
~iII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPI
i i
f
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISO,/)J ~ I WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
';, Sec: iU5ltUciion
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I \ ~T GN.o-Me.(' &rov.. ,," \.00--t<!.(' :;;to 1\
Sampler Name
and initials: I '"'TO,1\f\cr HaJl ;J~/rH Location (well name):L.-'-!...H~W=--_3~A!-.-_______ --..I
Date and Time for Purgin~ .?-./IS/;l.OI \ and Sampling (if different) 'w:;U;.;;:....:..J~b/~;)..O~I .:.....1 ___ --l
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 'Q",,-o-('-\-c:.r\.~ Cr w
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0
Specific Conductance .... ' __ '1..:..!l-.;'\-'-_--III-IMHOSI em
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ ~E> 3D
Conductance (avg) kl44
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L..I_M_W_-_18 ____ -1
pH Buffer 4.0 .
Well Dcpth(O.Olft): I 'is.00
Casing Volume (V) 4" Wel1 :~(.G53h)
3" WeU:u:::==J(.367h)
pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I I ~ 'M Redox Potential (Eh) .... ' .... 3""'Ci4"""--_ ....... TurbiditylL-......;;.:. 5""-_-1
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) I -;tf. ...
Time , oqa.S I Gal. Purged I ~:;J.. I Time , O'l':<b I Gal. Purged , g 5;), I
Conductance I b 14l.{ I pHI f, 0, I Conductance I Co\4r I pH I Co D-S I
Temp. DC I \1.\ \9 I Temp. DC I 14.lY I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) [ '30~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;>o~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I s I Turbidity (NTU) I • .>-I
Time I 0921 I Gal. Purged I ~ .1':2 I Time I O'i~8' I Gal. Purged I ~.9~ I
Conductance I bl ~1 I pHI C; OS I Conductance I blLl5 I pH I ~.o __ ; I
Temp. DC I 14 n I Temp.oC 1 1~¢3 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~Oj I Redox Potcntial Eh (mV) I 31Q I
Turbidity (NTU) I 'c:~ I Turbidity (NTU) I .S I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A 10f2 capturx' CDM.A"'~E W'TH ......... _ri:r--.U.tT'oN."n I
~ill· Grou'!dwater Discharge Permit DatI!: 03/22/2010 Rl!v. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged ,-I ...J.L.:....I ....:.~~~ __ ...J gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 . ').06
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T"'-2V/Q= I ~O.qO I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) L8D
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,-....;..,v._z....:..f\ ______ -J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
~ • ~
:l .
Type of Sam pic
VOCs
Nutrients
Heavy Metals
All Other Non Radiologies
Gross Alpha
Other (specifY)
Sv. '-t~~f
'IDS
y
0
0
~
0
0
~
if other than as
N specified below)
0 3x40ml
0 100m)
0 250 ml
0 250m!
0 1,000 ml
0 Sample volume
Type Added
y N Y
0 0 HCL 0
0 0 H2SO4 0
Ii:! 0 HN03 E[
0 0 No Preserv. 0
0 0 HN03 0
0 Ii] 0
Tfprcscrvativc is u.~cd. specity
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
~ See instruction ~Comment
Arr.-.)<4 .:)1\ ~.~< 1.1.4 OJ)LlD -("'I\(\~" HdhJ~ ~"ITti.:J\'1 ,for r"r,,~ alJ~ .s4"'rh~ event ?v.r~o: be'~n c.o.~ c!S'i.'i.
A5 '>OM 6..S :r .s~w t='o~ ~",\-~ aec.rc~;~ J: toc;.~ t.t ;SC:+s of' f>ttC'o.M.e.t<.("~
Pv..r~ea \0dl .\01' ~ htol.l of ~ M.nv.to v,,1\\,1 ltJe II R~n D r,j I, Pv.(~e cndeJ. IXt 0'1'"10
N
0
0
0
0
0
[j
\0,,~c(' \.V~ d~o..l"'~ Dc:r~ -1-0 \..:)c.J·u o...\.Tc(" pv...~,<::: \.u~~ 'fl .~<i Lc.~t sJe "t-Arl"'uc:!~ on sd·<; ""t iOOO U .MU Hoil .a"i prcs.!,rt +" C.oHa+ .5ti.rVlpl1!.5 '()cpt~ +D \,o)qicr (....XI.s t.5 8~
Sc.M?I~ t0erc pv..lI<.J. ",t IOO.s Ler~ ~;+c. ",t Jooq
'-_______ --'100 not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Workshl!et (or Groundwater .A 2012 capturx' CO"~AT"L' \¥ITH~""""W--'UNCTU)NA'ITY
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I ATTACHMENT 1 I OENISONI)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: \ ST QlAArt((" &1" DlAnJ W", ie'; ~o 11
Location (well name):l-' -=M--.:...-vJ_-.....;;.5~ ________ ---l
Sampler Name
and initials: ,:::r;.I1Yl ~ r 1-] 0 II:J ~ /-r»
Date and Time for Purgin~ ').../1 Li/ ~Ol \ and Sampling (if different) O'--:'#....I.'I""'A:L...-. _____ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event Q",o.rt-c"'8 <rW
pH Buffer 7.0 7_0
Specific Conductance .... ' _-,'1-"'~-L' __ ---II ~MHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ ) ob.3S
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) , Qf..D
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event IL....-M_W_-~_~ ____ --J
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): , 13g.5 b
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ~O·~'l 1(·653h)
3" Well:L.... _() __ -J. (.367h)
7.31
Well Water Temp. (avg) , 14 .~S Redox Potential (Eh) , :f... \..\ J Turbidity' \ 6.9...
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 0 0
(.
Time , 13\S I Gal. Purged , '-\;;2..31 I Time I 1-3}~ I Gal. Purged , LJ:1 .,&3 I
Conductance I ~)~4 I pHI 7 .~:l.. I Conductance I :!> )'1~ I pHI 7·31 I
Temp.oC ! Iq·,:)!;; I Temp.oC I \'1.3b I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ! ;;LSD I Redox Potential Eh (m V) ! ~q j I
Turbidity (NTU) I 16.~ I Turbidity (NTU) l lk·:..z. J
Time ! 1::)1'7 I Gal. Purged ! :l~,J~ I Time ! 1~1 8 I Gal. Purged! q;J,. s.(, I
Conductance I ~1'1~ I pHI 7.::!\ I Conductance I ~1'1!l: I pH!7.31 I
Temp.oC ! 1L\.~9 I Temp.oC ! 1'-l.3Q I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) ! 2.14] I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~I{S I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1 b .'J... I Turbidity (NTU) I lb.1 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 1...\3. L] 6
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . ;2.11
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 11Q3.Y'1 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ .... _N_/. ... I1,--_____ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals m 0 250ml E 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross AJpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
Arr:\ld. On s.;+c:. 6,.1-OQ'!;4_ ~n"<r Ho)I:J"J fre.s~fl+ ~,... r"\~c: Q."c.t ~'it"'p}:\j ~n+'
?\A(,~c. be~r'I (}..~ 1000. f'\)..r~t;~ \A)c\\ tor ~ -to1-&..\ rS d..O~ ""\',nv.+c.s. 1..01).:h:r Wfil.~
~ 1:H\-c. ~:r~. \)c(j hH~ c.blbrt.\i~o"" tl> ~<l.1o·, ?u.~c -cYl~'C~ ~t1A .sc..mpl't lAJ~
Lc>lkdd A-\-1:3;({)_ Oc.pt~ -h WOI.+C( t'lt1(r p4(je vVQ,.S ,.?.~ .:;Zl
L~n .5 ;1-t: A-t 13.d.7
L--_______ --IIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
See instruction
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONII) ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
I~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: Gv.o..f'T(J'l -a CrrO\N\J. WA1-<.,r ~O 11
Location (well name):1 ~W -\' ~----~----------------~
Sampler Name
and initials: I --'-;;"n~r H oll.·cI~?! Jnt
Date and Time for Purgind -;).../ a...1 ;;1.01 \ and Sampling (if different) "N/.t\ ~--~----------~
Well Purging Equip Used:@Jpumpo@bailerWellPump(ifotherthanBennet) LI --=Q:J...~!:.....!:D::....-______ --.J
Sampling Event 1 Qv.o..rt-c.rl~ 6-W ~(:)I) Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1~_M_W_-_3_0 ________ --,
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 ___ ~_q~ ______ ~1 f,lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ g~. n
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 11·0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 J30.D~
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ;;lb-b~
3" Well: b
7.YK
1(·653h)
(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 13.37 Redox Potential (Eh) 1L.,?:_L._ly __ --.J TurbidityLI _O __ ----J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) 1-17 0 ( I
Time 1 1&% I Gal. Purged 1 'S~.H.c:> I Time I Id-YCo I Gal. Purged I S3.38' I
Conductance 1 ·?3S~ I pHI 7.Lj~ I Conductance I ?"'~bO I pH I 7-L'lq I
Temp.oC 1 1:;,":~A 1 Temp.oC Il ~·31 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ,?.L19 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) I5:Y Y I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 Q 1 Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1
Time Il~Y' 1 Gal. Purged 1 "s"2.,.S~ 1 Time 1 \a..Y8 I Gal. Purged I 'Y>. 1:) \ 1
Conductance 1 ~C;;K 1 pH 1 7 ·147 1 Conductance 1 ~bj I pH I J .147 I
Temp.oC 1 13 ·3Q I Temp.oC 113.'--1 0 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 .?'-/~ 1 Redox Potential Eh (mY) 1 ~ q 0 I
Turbidity (NTU) I a I Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I SL\ .AS
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = I • ~n
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~Y5·\.j3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ AWAL 1 S~+ of vOC.S
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 I!i H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250 ml [3 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics ~ 0 250 rnl 0 I;ZI No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 1)1 0 1,000 rnl I!I 0 HN03 1)g
Other (specify) En 0 Sample volume 0 [j 0
~t'o..\ \Y\or~I\'~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Af'r"~ca 'bYl ~:-\-<.. 0..1 o~30 . "'Te..nM,. o.n~ ("",r6r"1 fr~5.-GI\~ tOI'" f'Ui":J-e. o.l"\d .sc:.Mpll·(\~ e\JCJ1¢.
r\,,('~c b~~Qf\ o..q. 0$54()' P"'r~<.t\ vJ~n ~r '" -:totc),) ~ d-.SD fv\:Y\v..tes .
V0cA.~-c(' w~ C\-z:oJ ~hiOV-~ho~ 'P\).(~G. ?\)-r~(,. GY\tl.e~ O-Y\vl S~M?I<J
'vO<'fz LD\\d.1-<d. #,}-);GD. D~htc:, \.0,,-~<{' lA9rC( ?v,.(~/!: 0£AS. 39.~S
\....Sf ~~\(. Q....\ \30\
'---________ ....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
~
0
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
I
; ()ENISONI)J~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[(j See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: II sT QW>.l"ter GroW)J\ \/JOI. -tcr ~ \ 1
Location (well name):L-1 _""_w_-_l_:J. ________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: F1::Mne.f" Hol1,~~~/l1t
Date and Time for PurgingJ1-;;2._-1_4_-_;l.._O_I_' ___ --' and Sampling (if different) I ~/ IS /.9D II
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I,--Q_~_D ____ -,
Sampling Event I Q\MM"tcrb Cy.J
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance L..I -..:..4 4"':"~"--__ ---I1 ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 109. S D
Conductance (avg)
I ~w-S Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_______ --'
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): L-ll_3_0_,L.:_l __ -,
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:I IY ·30 1(.653h)
3" Well:L-. _o __ -J.(.367h)
6·y
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \Y.51 Redox Potential (Eh) L...;I a;"";,,,....;./...:...1 _--' TurbidityL-1 _7_, 'i __ -,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)l 11 0,-
Time I 13()C> I Gal. Purged I I'?> .'-l~ I Time I 130J I Gal. Purged I U.~ . bb I
Conductance I Y,:2.bD I pHI b,3~ I Conductance I LP.~q I pH I b.3 '} I
Temp.oC I '\.~.3 =, I Temp.oC I lQ·3i I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;),.7d-.... I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I d-7iJ-. I
Turbidity (NTU) I 7 .g I Turbidity (NTU) I I '~ I
Time I 13 ()9--, I Gal. Purged I \~.81 I Time I 1303 I Gal. Purged I I~.oq I
Conductance I q;z.b5 I pHI b .3~ I Conductance I 1...j.;l,~3 I pH I b ·r:13 I
Temp.oC I 11...1.3] I Temp.oC I P=1. 3t: I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~71 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I d-.IO I
Turbidity (NTU) I 7, Cj I Turbidity (NTU) I 7.~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ;;t~ .£15
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . ;;;"17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I /31.80 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) \,74
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-_-v._I".A _______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 'EI 0 250ml E 0 HN03 1:J 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Arr:\Ieo. on site 01,1 113D. I'o.nn<.t-H~ H;cl.~ ~r~~'Cn1 ~r ?\).~c 41'1~ ~~Mpl i ~,\ el.lc'f\t·
?v.r~-c.. h~1),1] O\.-t '\3.5. Kf\o~;~ -the:. well 1.0c>u.\,)" f IA.I'\ tAr~ "L otook. L\ S~ 6f
?"'i~1YIC.~'(~ ()..f:> .sbOl\ "'~ 1. nohc~ 1=10\.0.\ r",-t< ~of'.t:.rc:.~;~I\' fv..r~Gb.. \..)c.l\ -fD. IA..~J(.J J; ns M\nlA~(.":>, l'v.("~~ \1:)-<::\\ t1.~ Dc::f-th 'h, ~oc\U' Q..~'r f~~C. ~ ~ . .s,. l~~ ~;+<. ~+ 1.3~
f'v.~<:.. cnJ.c~ ~ l~C>· Arr;\l<b, 0/\ ..s;tc.. ~t ol~4, --rb../lnt:r rlDI1;J,,\\ f>rG5e..d-J..o ('ollc:c.1-.,5Ql'l1fJe.
Oept~ -k \,o.)fA1,r b~torc.Sf.l,Mf\G WCi~ \O~.ll . S6\Mpk ,o\kc.1~d lA.1-Ol-5D. Lc:..\t .,s;h ~+-1::,7.5",
L..-_______ ----IIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 20f2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
OENISO
ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 I ,} See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I ~T QV\J)o..rTe.r GrC)lA1\J\ W <1\ Of <f ~ D, \
Location (well name):L-I ----'...M_W-'-"-_-1-14.:....-_______ -----'
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;",(\(.r Htlll.~",'c1/'J.l
Date and Time for Purgind ~/7/:;l..t>1\ and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used:@]pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I Qv.o..(',,"v1 ~ b-W U, \ I ~W-~S Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L--_______ ---I
pH Buffer 7.0 7·0 pH Buffer 4.0 '-LO
Specific ConductanceL...1 _~:.....;q....;.'1 __ --Ih.lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I ,~g.7C
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ I 03.]Q Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 10,?-,~ 1(·653h)
3" Well: Q (.367h) L-~_----'
Conductance (avg) Y035 pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \"'1> .~,-\ Redox Potential (Eh) I '-_l _CO_g_----I Turbidity ...... 1 _0 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) 1-JOe
Time I llS!) I Gal. Purged I 33.b3 I Time I I~b I Gal. Purged I 33. SS I
Conductance 1 I..\D37 1 pHI b.X( I Conductance 14635 I pH 1 CO·:G I
Temp.oC I 13·q3 I Temp.oC I 13.q5 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I \7C I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I lb~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I b I
Time I 1;;23 7 I Gal. Purged I 31..). 0 6 I Time 1 1~8 I Gal. Purged I 3Y . ~ <a I
Conductance I:iD3~ I pH I b·:;l,3 I Conductance I Y035 I pHI b.x;( I
Temp.oC I \;).93 I Temp.oC I 13-'33 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I lb~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I l~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I Q I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 3\..\'7~
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I ~ ;l'y7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I jt-\q .Cll I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ /tINA L I ~ d of V OC.s
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL fZI
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 rlI H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml rn 0 RN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies ~ 0 250ml 0 rlI No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha rn 0 1,000 ml tB 0 RNa 3 ~
Other (specify) [] 0 Sample volume 0 m 0
(,-"<:;n~.rC\\ -:I:n or~o...fI; c.S If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
l / ,I, See instruction
Af"r ;'\l~o.. 0\'\ ~;-\-o:=. "'+ \011 . I~n nu ~o)\;dG\.J i~ ~re.s<.rd· f~r pw~~ ~I"\~ .so..tv1p1:~ -e..v~n+.
Pv-('~c:... be~o..1\ ~+ \b~O . ~\"r~~d.. We-I \ ~or '" -toto..\ o-t I '-0 Min", tes . Wo..ter LUo..~
c..\-eo..'C' i1,l"ov..<fc>\,).~ ?\A\~e. P\'\1"~~ e.nJed. ~(I~ So..rYlfks L0ef'~ (.oll~G+ecJ. 11>.-t-1300 .
Left ~'t"<. oj· 1.3)). D~f'th +0 WG\.-t(r o...-\1c::r ?\}\r~~ \.0a.~ IOY.I~
L....... _______ ----IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
~
0
EI
2 of 2
Mill • G~dwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/2'1./2010 RtV. ~
~ater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (UAP)
I
! ,
i
I t
OENISON'l J MINES
ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
See illstruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FO}t GROUND WATER
Location (well name): .... 1 _--J.M-:..:.;W~-~I~~ ______ --J
Sampler Name
and initials: I'''f~t'ln-er I~Gl\ ,J'~/'--n
Dote and Time for Purgind J./I!?/;).,O I , and Sainpling (if different) N/-l
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if o~her ihan Beunet) I QED
Sampling Event I Q",,,,,A'~"'\':lC-vJ Prevo Well Sampleclin Sampling Event I .... ~M_W_: ~_l_~_~:-'-_--'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 __ 'l.:..4.:..'\"'--_--'I~MHOSI em
Depth to Water Before Purginsl "70. 3S I
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4,0 y ·o
Well Depth(O;Olft):. ,I 13li.OO
Casing Volunle (V) 4" Wel1:141.5f>
3" Well:. 0
pH of Water (avg)
I
1
(·G53h)
.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1"\ If!. Redox Potential (Eh)1 26~ .1. Turbidity ...... 1 ....:..\-=.()~_ ......
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) I ;, 3~
Time I 14$-I Gal. Purged I 83 ... s: I Time I 14310 I Gal. Purged I 8'>« ff I
Conduct~nce I ~:'~9 I pHI Co ,:t,'=. I Conductance I ~.5~O I p,H I b :¢7 , I
Temp.oC I i;>.ii> I Tenip.oC I \3:17 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .20~ I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ¢Pq I , ..
Turbidity (NTU). I \.D I Turbi4i~ ,(NTU) ., \.0 I . , ..
Time I J~37 I Gal. Purged 1 15: 5'. 1 1 Time i Iti38 . 1 Gal Purge~ r K'I" 2. .J
Conductance I ~tfO 1 pH I (".,..~'J 1 Conductance I ~".I , I pH 1 to. ;).7 J ..
Temp.oC I i:;'·'1t) I Temp.oC 113.7'1 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :lo;;t. I Redox Potential E~ (mV) I ~t> I
Turbidity (NTU) I l.Q I Turbidity (NTU) I 1.0 t
' .. ' .
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A 10f2 capturx· COM'Ulno "'iH/,"_~'UHCT'O"ALITI
• Mill· G~oundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPI
Volume of Water Purged I $4. f,,3
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
SI60 "" I . :;>.1]
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V1Q = 1383 .07 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-__ N._,/_" _____ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N spccified below) y N Type y
VOCs CJ 0 3x40 ml CJ 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mi 0 0 H2SO4 0
Henvy Metals m 0 250ml ffi 0 HN03 iii
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) iii 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
.> v-'.\C\.-\e,. If preservative is lIscd, specify
Type and Quantity of
IP:, Preservative:
See instruction
A,..r:\lc.tX 01\ ~ ',+c.. c-~ 08D5 \"',1'!1\~r-\'\oll,J~ f't"ti<n+-\~r 'Pu.~c:: o.n~ ..st.\Mrl;~ e.uent.
\'v..r~e.. b5"''' 0..+ D~IO . P v.C'~'Ctl "'.Je.1I ~or CI.. +ot~\ 0.\ :)~() M\l'ttA\-~~.
0, .. :\-<.( \".)i>..!::. d~(" +hr OlA~~ov.\ ?V-'('~C . Yu.rjC cnJ~t.l. ~f'ltl SCi.flllpleS
w ·ere. l,..olkdc! ~t 11,40 D Cf'lh +0 L.J~+e~ 6\~(r fW~'( WGl..~ 71 ~~
Ld+ ~I+e. A:~ HSI
L..-_______ --I!Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
N
0
0
0
0
0
rn
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 2of2 capturx' CON'ATI_LI W'TH../'--HU'n.-'~"CT'O>lAliTV
Mif! -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitonng Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
,OENISO.})j~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attaclunent 1
_-j; See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Samplin~ Event: I ,sT Q v..w +u U-r O\J-f\9 -W •. dc:.r ;;"0 II
Location (well name):I ..... -=-f..i~w:...-....:.i.....:q'--_______ .....
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~l'IIIcr H¢l/:J",,<\/Tlt
Date and Time for Purginm ;l.,/:;l./I:z..o l'
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I Q\N).MUG &w
pH Buffer 7.0 7C>
Specific Conductance 1L..--Lq'f....:.'i..L-__ ...... ! (.1MHOSJ em
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ }> I c>;t..
Conductance (avg) \YSl
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prey. Well Sampled in Sampling Event L..I _______ -J
pH Buffer 4.0 y D
Well Depth(O.Olft): I J'i'l .OO
Casing Volume (V) 4" Well:~(.653h)
3" Wcll:~(.367h)
pH of Water (avg)
WelJ Water Temp. (avg) I I ~ DE Redox Potential (Eh)1 J,..7Q Turbidity ..... 1 _E> ..... 1..:..' I _~
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event) I -?:,o" 1
Time I t':\E I Gal. Purged 1 13~. 37 I Time I ,"'?,..b I Gal. Purged 1 1~.58 I
Conductance I j~57 I pH I b.g~ I Conductance I lj~g I pH I b g ~ I
Temp. DC I IY 01 I Temp. DC I )~.Q7 I
Redox: Potential Eh (m V) I ;;'7 5 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :;2.7~ I
Turbidity (NUl) I l,;i I Turbidity (NTU) I 5 .0\-I
Time I IY;l.' I Gal. Purged I 13)...&0 I Time I Iq;jl.g' I Gal. Purged 1133.0 .:2 I
Conductance I l!:te:2 I pH I b7'i ! Conductance I i ~bb I pH I b 71/ I
Temp. DC I 14 07 I Temp.oC I 14 ru. I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I J,..S< I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .:2£2 I
Turbidity (NTU) I ~·i I Turbidity (NTU) I 5·/ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 10'2 capturx' CO."ATI8Ll W'TH..;""--....... rir-FuHCT'ONALIU
Min -Groundwater Discharge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAPl
Volume of Water Purged I I.?\.~· &:IS
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60= I ·.217
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T ~ 2V/Q"'-I SiS'\, h ~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
Ifwell evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabfL..-M=.:....JvA'-'--_____ ~
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type Y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 m1 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Melals 0 0 250ml 0 0 RN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
Ifpreservative is used. specifY
Type and Quantity of
Preser.·ative:
. ~ !lComment
A(/';\J~l on sJl!~..r DI.(Og '~I\f\er N~j(:J40 rrc:.~wt +0 pv..r~e Mw~/'i .
P,",r~c:. bC~DJ\ ~~ 0'-\1£>. fo.r~'C~ Well ~r c:... to+" I 0+ bl.5 1V\,nv..tc:.S .
W .. +er 1.;)~ d ... r 1-hr ~~o~ f,,~e . p,,(~<. ""jed "t 1~30
D~p+h +¢ Wu.4<.r '\~ef' rv.':3~ ~u.~ S~·I'l . Le.4 .s;·lc. At H3S
L...-_______ ........JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
See instruction
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A 20f2 capturx· COM'ATIBLE W'TH/'" __ /ir--PuNcTloNAL,n
Mill-Grouodwiter Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
t>ENISO'/) J: ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
~' See instruction
M INES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
DcscriptionofSampli~gEvcnt: I 1ST Ci:l VJA.c-kr Crrov..f\J.We...h.r ~¢I l
Sampler Name
Location (well name):1 M w-~c and initials : 1 ~~Me.r lioll:,)."'j /Tlt
Date and Time for PurgingJ\...;;..d-.:....I-=-g..:....;/~=u..:.;I' ____ ....I and Sampling (if different) 1-:1 2::::;;/:-':.;::'-:.:.../.:;..~::.;:;.()~II ___ --I
Well Purging Equip Used :~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I (yv..o.rh.r'~ G-\J
pH Buffer 7.0 ,0
Specific Conductance .... 1 ....;q~q<t.:..-__ ---IIJlMHOSI em
Depth to Water Before Purgind £.10
Conductance (avg) bT1'~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 ...;Q;.;...:....~~p ____ ....1
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_M_W_-_~ ____ --I
pH Buffcr4.0
Well Dcptb(O.O 1ft): ~..,.cc
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" w ell:1 3 .1'\ I (.653h)
3" Wcll:~. _o __ ~. (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I Id-..Li ;\ Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~ '10 Turbidity 1'---'7<-.-1"4_---'
Weather Condo Ext'J Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)I -'"ic ....
Time 113 d.-() I Gal. Purged I 5.-r~ I Time II :.);l l I Gal. Purged I !). 4.S I
Conductance I &1g ( I pHI b.'i3 I Conductance I b761 I pHI 6.'1.5 I .
Temp. DC I Ia.. ij:) I Temp. DC I I'; 3~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I :,1..~O I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~qo I
Turbidity (NTU) L "'1 .;;' I Turbidity (NTU) t Ib J
Time I I~~ I Gal. Purged I .~·1 4 I Time 1 1 3~3 I Gal. Purged I Ie, "3?l I
Conductance I bi~ I pHI Ce .'/G I Conductance 11016.7 I pHI (Q . q.r. I
Temp.oC I 1¢..4~ I Temp.oC 1 l:l. ", 'I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~'I O I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :J.. '1 0 I
Turbidity (NTU) [ '7:2 ! Turbidity (NTU) I 7 S I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Mill -Grouodwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1,---=,~:...=4~'-\ __ ~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
5/60 = I . J if ~
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T =2V/Q = I 3.'\:D I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labf A\,J 1\ L i .sed o~ \J 0 (. ~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type ofSamplc if otber than as Added
y N specified below) y . N Type y N
VOCs IS1 0 3x40 rot 0 aJ HCL IZI 0
Nutrients [iJ 0 100 ml 0 iii H2SO4 [!J 0
Heavy Metals ijJ 0 250m[ 5i) 0 HN03 (i;J 0
All Other Non Radiologies [j 0 250 ml 0 m NoPreserv. 0 ~
Gross Alpha I:j 0 1,000 ml SI 0 HN03 IS 0
Other (specify) m 0 Sample volume 0 III 0 il
(,.e.r.U"o..\ -rn<>~o.l'\ic:'::l Ifpre~erviltivc i!> used, s(lCcifY
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
L...-_______ --JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksneet for Groundwater .A 2 of? capturK CO,,"UTlIL[ WITH./'-HU'k-FUNCTIONAL(
I ..
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONr') ~
MINES
ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[~~ See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I ':.T G"lv.G\rkr-(,.r ou..Y\d, \No.:h.f" ~o 1\
Sampler Name
and initials: '~nr\~r Hoi /.·o\th~/IH Location (well name):, M W -M ~---------------------------------~
Date and Time for Purgingj ';J.../ <6/;;)..0 I' and Sampling (if different) N'/A ~~~---------------~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump o@bailerWellPump(ifotherthanBennet) .... 1 ....;:Q~E....;:D'"--_________ -'
I I f'lIW-IY Sampling Event ~Q.r·h.rltl &'vJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... _______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 4.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 ____ 4-'-q-'-q~ ___ ---'1 ~MHOSI cm Well Depth(O.Olft): '\\,:\.OD
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ C::> ~. q 1 Casing Volume (V) 4" well:l 2>o.7 L\ 1(.653h)
3" Well: 0 ,C.367h) L..-__ --'
Conductance (avg) Cl1 7Y pH of Water (avg) ,s,Sg ~~~------~
Well Water Temp. (avg) l\}.Oj Redox Potential (Eh) 1 3D':::' TurbiditYIL--Y_.4 __ ~
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event) I -5 0e.
Time 'I:J.-ID I Gal. Purged 1 fob. 710 I Time 1 1~11 I Gal. Purged I bD .97 I
Conductance 1(,,'1"15-I pH I S .S'7 I Conductance I b'11l I pH I E..bo I
Temp. DC I l'i ·\0 I Temp. DC III.\.O C: I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 30~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 303> I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 q~ I Turbidity (NTU) I !...j .Y I
Time 11?.1~ I Gal. Purged I b\. )~ I Time 1 1;;t.\3 I Gal. Purged 1 G \. 'J I I
Conductance 1 b~;<::> I pH 1 S .S! I Conductance I I;q bL> I pH I 5 .3g I
Temp. DC 11L\.D8 I Temp. DC I 'Q·07 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3;53 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ~u~ I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 ttG I Turbidity (NTU) 1 93 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I " 1 • g 9
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I .;).. \7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1;2.33 .ljO I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ AVJA 1.. 1 ,S c,t of' "0(.5 I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs [] 0 3x40 ml 0 [] HCL ~ 0
Nutrients rn 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 iJ 0
Heavy Metals [l 0 250ml 51 0 HN03 G1 0
All Other Non Radiologies 01 0 250ml 0 rlI No Preserv. 0 IZI
Gross Alpha C!I 0 1,000 ml I!:I 0 HN03 Ei!I 0
Other (specify) [:J 0 Sample volume 0 IE 0 I1J
&e.n-(.rlll' -r:(\o)-~o-,,; ~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
[ }, See instruction
L....-_______ ---lIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)~~ ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[-See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: '),ST Q"'~1" h r (;-("OIJ\(\J. vJ",,+<.<" ~Oll
Location (well name ):,I--JV.._w_-_;t3-=-________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: '...,-e..r'\I1~'I" ~o 11 ;J,~ /TH
Date and Time for PurgingJa......;;;,,;;;....:../_".:..:..J_~_D_..,;l..:...1 ___ ----l and Sampling (if different) N'//l-~~------~
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 'Q E:D 1---'---------'
Sampling Event ,Q",cM' t,,('\~ &-\oJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I .M W -:3~
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0 pH Buffer 4.0 q.O
Specific ConductanceL-' _-:,9-:,QQ...!...-__ ....IIIlMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): t3;t·oa
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 113. ~ 0 Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) , I 'J...l 0 Redox Potential (Eh) , '3 'J5
4"well:1 \1.8\ 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-__ O __ --'.(.367h)
~.13
TurbiditYL-' --'\";"" b __ -"
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)' 0° c:.
Time , 14d-.O I Gal. Purged I \1.'=-8 I Time I ,y~\ I Gal. Purged , 17 .gg I
Conductance I LjOO~ I pH , (0·1:3> I Conductance 1 1400(:, I pHI (0·13 I
Temp. DC 11 ;;l..FO I Temp. DC 11<1 .13 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 :>:;2.(0 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3.?k I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1.7 I Turbidity (NTU) I J.b I
Time 11"lxt I Gal. Purged 1 \~-Dq I Time I \ 'i 2") I Gal. Purged I 18 .3D I
Conductance I \iDO b I pH I ~·I.> I Conductance I qODb I pHI b. L3 I
Temp. DC 1 l?-,.Ob I Temp. DC I l;;t·o' I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3 ;LS I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3 =;).5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1.7 I Turbidity (NTU) I 1. ~ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I #. ~g
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . ?,.og
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 1 \ 3, "4 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I ,.Q3
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L_/II._Y._A ______ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 m! 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 mI 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250mI 0 0 RN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 mI 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
, ~ See instruction
Comment
'--_______ ----'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OEN.SOn ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
r ~~~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 15T Qv..().~fe r G-(ou.nJ\\J",=t<.<' ~o"
Location (well name): .... 1 _M_W_-_:J.._Y-'--_______ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: l .-tAl''1n<.r H~ll;d\Q.~/-r~
Date and Time for PUl·gin~L..-g...=:....:...-/....:..'i:....:/ 2:.=..0_'_' ____ ......I and Sampling (if different) 1 :;;"'/10 / ~ 11
Well Purging Equip Used: [IDpump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) Q €D L..-~-=-___ --J
Sampling Event 1 Q",,~("h·(b Cr'v0
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 __ q.:....q!...:'\-'--_----II f.1MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ , \ L\ • Sc::,
Conductance (avg)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I J'.\W-';]'3
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1;1.0.0b
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 3. S5 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) L.....-__ --'
Well Water Temp. (avg) )3,l)\ Redox Potential (Eh)1 300 Turbidity 1 ).~
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 0 0
.;
Time 1 \~'S I Gal. Purged 1 3. & t-t I Time I 13)~ I Gal. Purged 1 L1. 0.3 I
Conductance I Lj b4 \ I pH 1 ~.7b I Conductance I Y(,Lll I pH 1 'S .7.5 I
Temp.oC 11 3.00 I Temp.oC 1 13 ,o~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I .?.'1Z I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~44 I
Turbidity (NTU) I J,~ I Turbidity (NTU) I , .g, I
Time I \sn I Gal. Purged I ~.M I Time I 131?) I Gal. Purged 1 L1 . \oj J I
Conductance I LJbl\:l I pH I 5.75 I Conductance I :i bLl ~ I pH 1 S .73 I
Temp.oC 1 \3.DD I Temp.oC I 13.00 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~D l I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ~w. I
Turbidity (NTU) I 1..2 I Turbidity (NTU) I ]. 2. I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I .5-7~ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I -\q~ T=2V/Q= I 3 7.00 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) I 1. bd...
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated 5.7£
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L-.~N,.;.!.,/~A':""-_____ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl
Nutrients 0 0 100 rnl
Heavy Metals B 0 250 rnl
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 rnl
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 rnl
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume
Comment
Y N
0 0
0 0
1511 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Added Type y
HCL 0
H2SO4 0
HN03 I'lSl
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
1---: See instruction
I ' ~
Arr :\)c.~ on ~;t<.. c...-\-\L\'1Q . -rt.."f\-t.f" Hol\;~GI~ ?r~~n1 ill. .?u.('~<.. I\\W -~""l
?VI.{,~~ be~",,,, ~1 \l\SS. -roov, ?"'r~l\'\~h.("5. o..f.hr ~D M,r\",,\--e..!> tAv.<.. to 'FID~ (ti..+c
Je:.(.{"UAS.i ~. Pu..r~'('~ Wc.ll ~b( #... .teA· A \ "t!i 3D 1'-"\,1'\",-\6 . W-eJi 'R~t'l Dr~l.
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
\()f.I:rcr \j.)a..) MOS\\~ c.\eu.('. Dcp-rh +1) -w",,1<r tAga f'v.r~"O( wv.5:. I \b.l \ Ld1 .s;1-c Po..} t530
Arr':IJ<lA DI1 ~;+< "'+ o7bS. -(CU'II'\er" lio \);JG\~ fr~<:.(\+ -tc) c..e:.l/e.(,t ~""Mfk . OC:ft~ +0 WtA:kr be.\'ort:.. ~Cll"'lfk. ~~ -ro.v,c.Y\ WCA.~. Sc...r1I\?k <...o\l ~decl t).:-\ D~O(). L~.r1 ~'It-c &\-1 08Dt;.
11~.bS
'--_______ ----'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill .. Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONf)J~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
r-~ ~I See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: G\lla.r-\ .. -cr1i Cn-O v.vv}> WC\.fvT ~o, 1
Location (well name):I'-_M_W_-...:...;lS _________ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: I"'-; .. m<.f" Ho J1:JIlI,~/TH
Date and Time for Purgin~,-~;......:....:/').;..;./.:...;~~O-,-\ ,'---___ -' and Sampling (if different) .;V'/A, '---------~
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I Q~()..,t-e-rltl c,.W ,2.011 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event LI __ M_W_-_l_l ___ -J
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0
Specific ConductanceLI_q:......:q~q ___ _1IJlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ -"1'1 .7 fo
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 Y·O
Well Depth(O.Olft): '\5.00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ?-c:'·?-7 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '""""----"------'
Well Water Temp. (avg) I ,~.SS Redox Potential (Eh) 1L-'3_1_5 __ --' Tlu"biditY,-1 _0 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling eventll -17 °(.1
Time I 130.5 I Gal. Purged I S~.'J..S I Time I nDt;. I Gal. Purged I s'-\ . '-1-b I
Conductance I 3.171 I pHI b.bCf I Conductance 13.173 I pHI (;.63 I
Temp.oC I 1;;.5 7 I Temp.oC I 13.1;5 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3:tb I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I s r~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I u I
Time I '~D] I Gal. Purged I S4 .. 6~ I Time I \3D 8 I Gal. Purged I SL\ .. qD I
Conductance I :Sl ~:b I pHI b .GC I Conductance I 31 715 I pHI b.b~ I
Temp.oC I 1"J.Se; I Temp.oC I 1'35J I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3 Pl I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '31:,J I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 15 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 5:) .33
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . J..17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I ?l-\:;A.)g I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl AWAL ,.sod or" c,c.~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs ij1 0 3x40 rn1
Nutrients ~ 0 100 rn1
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250 rn1
All Other Non Radiologics Ell 0 250 rn1
Gross Alpha 171 0 1,000 rn1
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume
Comment
Y N
0 III
0 !:zJ
111 0
0 jZJ
lSI 0
0 ~
Added Type y
HCL 1Zl
H2SO4 &I
HN03 ~
No Preserv. 0
HN03 ~
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
,---See instruction I ~
Arr;\)·d. on ~;tc::. «t 0&'15 . 1c..·(I)'\<.r ChY\tA &,,((;n ?I"~c.rd .. tor pU\~e.. o..rlJ.. ..s~1'"Y1fl ;~ 'C\J'"C::yrt ..
?ur~-e. 'b~o.h 0.1-08.5S, Pv.r~-<.tA. Well .fo(' ~ tol~' 0{' ~SS M ;.-1 ""+ t:.s .
\Vc;..t-<.r wo.~ dec..r -i-hfc::.~\..()~ p\Ar~t. p"'\j<" -en~e~ ~nJ. .s~Mpl-cj
\,J'«(<. (.ol[-cdr;ct o.~ 1310 . D.:pth 1-0 \OtAt(r I1.t+Cr puUc. WGl.) 7b.7S
L-c~ j;+e-t1I.-t 13M
~ _______ --,IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
J)!1
0
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
i OENISONI)J~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
! MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER ----
Description of Sampling Event: 11 ~"T Qv.o.dc.r Gf"ou.n£l\ W()oo..+~(" ;2..0 J I
Location (well name):LI .:..-M...:....W_-_?--_b ________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: 1""-",,, ncf R 0 )1,1\ ~ I, It
Date and Time for Purgin~ ?-/ I r.:,/~O I \ and Sampling (if different) #/A L-_______ ~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I Gn.,,(\J\:ro~
Sampling Event IQ\)..",rte("~ lrw Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1_M_W_-_3 ____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D
Specific Conductance .... I_C1'-'~'_q.L.._ __ _IIJ.lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 74. 8 1
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 Y·D
Well Depth(O.Olft): ~lPlJ=.:....<33I:::.-_-I
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
411 well:~_t:>~_-II(.653h)
3" Well:. () .(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \1.\. SS Redox Potential (Eh) 11...-3_1_1 _-' TurbiditYI.-I _I:>;.......-_--.J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 gllc.
Time pns I Gal. Purged I S I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I ~S~Z I pHI b.Ob I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I IY . .5S I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~II I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I Q I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I . Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 _____ ...J
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1...-1 --=S---l.y __ .....J
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ A vJ A L I sd or \Joc.s I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 ml 0 r'J HCL KI 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 rn H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals IE 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies !] 0 250ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 ..lEI
Gross Alpha 1tJ 0 1,000 ml 12!1 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) E1 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
Gen~ro-.\ -:rnoGo,,1\;('~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Al'f~'\I'Cr). 6~ !:I·.t~ ~i \11:-ldo.(\l'\<.r-~O\l'I~:J pre.s~rJ--+0 c-b\\-c:d St'.\fVJpk-S .
M\rJ;1.."-\~ c... (,on~\ nv..Ou.~ p\J\h'\p'II"~ \N-ell. '1'ooK \ Sd 6f; f(i\r~rI\e1e(.s
~(.I.~pk~ wac.. \u..'\(:~ 0..1 \~C::.~ \,0~1-t:( WIA~ <:l'f:cAf'.
L~U ~;tc u.1-J~3 7
L-_______ ----IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONI) ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 l ~ . See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: II ~'1 Gv.o-c-fu· G-rolAnJ: w, ... l<~ ;Z 011
Location (well name):II-_M_W_--=-;l....,;1 _________ ---I
Sampler Name
and initials: I T"'M~r Aoll : dD..!J/,-tt
Date and Time for PurgingjL,.;;~......:..../....,;<1.:....J=-~_o_,, ____ _' and Sampling (if different) L........::jI/~'j-=-A-=---_____ ---I
Well Purging Equip Used: lID pum p or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 O_E_D ____ ---'
! MW-2D Sampling Event I Gh)o.o.rtt:I""~ &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1-_______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .D
Specific Conductance'-I __ 4_~_4 __ ___'IIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ S(J. tty
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 L\.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): I 9,S ·O(J
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:! ?..S.77 !(.653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) 1..-__ ----'
Co.7 ,
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 14 .?:s Redox Potential (Eh) I 303 Turbidity 1 0 '--------'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event) 1-go 0 L
Time I n ss 1 Gal. Purged I S7.S0 1 Time 1 \ 15k. 1 Gal. Purged I 57.7;)... 1
Conductance 1 1St1~ 1 pH I (..7 ';;.. 1 Conductance I \S'i3 1 pH I (;,70 1
Temp.oC 1 1 4.~o I Temp.oC Ilq~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 303 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3 b3 I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I 115'7 I Gal. Purged I 57.~3 I Time I l\S ~ I Gal. Purged I .58 · \ll I
Conductance I lS'1 b I pH 1'.76 I Conductance I LS~1 I pH I b. Ii I
Temp.oC I 19· 'J-7 I Temp.oC I Iq .~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3CJLt I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '309 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 .s~ .s q
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 11.-,_;2._17 __ -1
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = l;t ~S . '1 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L.._N_/_A ______ --,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 129 0 100ml 0 ~ H2SO4 ~ 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha r:I 0 1,000 ml ~ 0 HN03 ~ 0
Other (specify) ~ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
TDS If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Ch'D\\c\e. Preservative:
S v. \ -\' 0-.1-eo.
Comment
I:" ~ See instruction
,,"J
A\"l:\lc.6. ton ~{+<. ~J o7;J..3 , --r;..t\n<.r ~QJI ;~"'J pre~C:f'\t for pu.r~~ (l.t'lcA SClmpl :~
P\A""~""<.. b-e~C).r'\ A.~ 0'13()· fu.<~cA. WeI\ for '" t-ot~' c>r ~7D M ~t'1I.A.+':::~, \Va-+Gor
0~ M£)!;.}I(j G '-c o.r-+"h(O~l\'ho"'+ pu.Y'(~( Fv..(~'C.. enJeo. a.(\~ ~o.YV\ple.s we.rc:.
Lollec..-\-c:,cX l>-..t ,,-CD. D~f>~ h \.0o..=t-er c....ttc.r pv.('~e vJ~ SJ..?S
Len ~ l·t<-0-..+ l~b~
'--_______ -..IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
MIII-.Groundwater Oischarge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monltorins Quality A55urClnce PICln 100P)
!
i i
f ,
ft ATTACHMENT 1
t>ENISOti"" ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
1.-MINi:S FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 !.!oT Ov.o.,..\.c.,. &ov..ntl We.. t e(' ~Cl\ t
Sampler Name
Location (well name):1 Mw _ ::ur and initials:
<fl See instruction
Date and Time for PurginS ~ MO ~I N/~l I and Sampling (if different) L--1tI._,;,...:It--'--_____ -I
Well Purging Equip Used: [][I pump o{Q] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 ...:Q~~..;D:::;..-. ___ .....
Sampling Event 1 Qv..M b;r1'1 k W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I M W -~
pH Buffer 7.0 [ 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Y,O
Specific Conductance 1-1 _~.l...,'{:"':~~_---II JlMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft): 'lie) .o()
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ ]1.) Y Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~l'-% 1<.653h)
3" Well: C> (.367h) '-----'
Conductance (avg) L.j01! pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp, (avg) 1 1~-;2.3 Redox Potential (Eh)L.,:1 :J.:;;;;.:....JljL-_-' TurbidityI-I _O"""'-_--J
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. ·C(prior sampling event)' -3 "s. I
Time I lila I Gal. Purged I yot. 3 1 I Time I 1I1!e I Gal. Purged I Y;;l..53 I
Conductance I =\0,1 I pH , !; 11 I Conductance I j Oil I pHI 5 70 I
Temp.oC I i Y p.4 I Temp.oC I 1:\ .:»1 I
Redox. Potential Eh (mV) , ;l.lS I Redox Potential Eh (mV) , ~1.5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 6 I
Time I IW7 I Gal. Purged , ~./~ I Time I 111$ I Gal. Purged I y~.qb I
Conductance 1 40/' I pH I !).bCf I Conductance I LiD! I I pH I Sb1 I
Temp.oC , ly.;t3 I Temp.oC I I Li .;1..'3 I
Redox: Potentia! Eh (mV) I 21!:l I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~13 I
Turbidity (NTU) I () I Turbidity (NTU) I D I
White Mesa Mill
Field Datil Worksheet for Groundwater ~. . 1 of2 capturx' CON,.,TIBU WITH/",U'U'W-.UNCTIONALITY
~
t-4,iII -. Groundwater Discharge Permit )
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP) I
Volume of Water Purged I '13 .<-\ gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calcylation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . .'J..IJ
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I i ~] 710 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
Ifwell evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl .... _,.t._'I_A ______ -I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below) y N Type
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HeL
Nutrients 0 0 lOOml 0 0 H2SO4
Heavy Metals 0 0 250mJ 0 0 HN03
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv.
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 lIN03
Other (specify) ij1 0 Sample volume 0 i1
Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Preservative
Added
y N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ~
Ch\O(.je... [fprcservativc is used, specifY
Type and Quantity of
Preservalive:
S See instruction
'Comment
-t
Ar('.l.;c~ 0(\ ~'.tc. ",l o7.So -r;."ner HolI\J~ prC:..5~n-t ..for f'lA"~-C fA('IO-~4 r'Y1fl.~ ~c..nt.
ru\~e. b~---Ja", tAt O~OO f\ ... r~~t\ \,Jell ",or '" -+o·tc.\ cA .:too M.(llAte..s
Wc..-fc:r WcO GIc~r ·thro~c\.(+-p~r\Je . Pv..C~C:: endeq <A.nA 5Qf11ph. Wc,~
(..011 eeJ-ec,.\ qt I I ~o , !)~P+~:t0 \.Vc.."t(r C\~r p v. (~C t.:)D.,s 80 . .0.5.
L~~t 51+"(. o.t 1/.;2.L..1
1--_______ --11 Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A . 2 of2 capturx CON~"'TI'LI WITH/'"_nr--FUHCliOHALlTV
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONr'l J WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[:~I See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 Qv-.Ar 1"U 1'0 G=fo",(\l'W~li:"-.9.011
Location (well name):I<-M_W_-_3_0 _________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1)";;",,<(' HoJl :~t!(jh1t
Date and Time for Purgin~ ~-) -Q.Oll and Sampling (if different) <-__ .I\I_/A-____ --'
Well Purging Equip Used: ~ pump o@bailerWellPump(ifotherthanBennet)L-Q_E_O ____ .....I
Sampling Event 1 QWArhr\~ 6-W ~O\) Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1'--_M_W_-_3_1 ____ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _"q_q ___ --JI J.!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ ib.3 \
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 '1 .0
Well Depth(O.Olft): L...ll_'D_,_O_D __ -J
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 d-\.~q 1(·653h)
3" Well:L... _O __ --'.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \-:;,::)"-1 Redox Potential (Eh) .... 1 _'3_0_g __ -I TurbiditYL...1 _Q __ ---'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 -5'\
Time 1 );7.35 I Gal. Purged 1 '-\3 .'"\ I Time 1 )X3b I Gal. Purged 1 q~. f) I I
Conductance I ;;"'OQ..D I pH 1 G:,·Q3 1 Conductance Id-.O.;l.D I pH I b.45 I
Temp.oC I 13 .314 I Temp.oC 1 1'3.3S I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~c:5q I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3og' I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I
Time I )g","31 I Gal. Purged I ~3. ~'3 I Time II;;!,,:) cg I Gal. Purged I q 4· DOS I
Conductance I ?-CJ'X3 I pHI c;;.qs I Conductance 12~ I pH I b·Zf~ I
Temp.oC I 13.33 I Temp.oC 1 13.'35) I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 307 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ~Z57 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I b I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I t..\l\,L.HS
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I -;).\/
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ',)..0-;;',710 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labj AWA L 1 .s c-\ l>r\jOcs.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs IE 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL 19
Nutrients I!I 0 100 ml 0 ~ H2SO4 EJ
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml 1fI 0 HN03 f1
All Other Non Radiologics ID 0 250 ml 0 III No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha rn 0 1,000 ml 'f] 0 HN03 lJ
Other (specify) m 0 Sample volume 0 I!:J 0
(n~nt:.(G\\ ~o('~ttY\ic.) If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
-,;iI See instruction
A,.(":\lca 01'\ f,:te. 0..1 OQ07. "-"I"\f\(( ~oll :cA"~ r,-e,sc,f\+ ~or pu.r~~ o..f'\ti\ .s"""pl"~ e\)~t1-1 .
p v..fj~ bG()/J,," 0-..+ 0'1 IS, p\)\f'~<'~ wC.n .\01' 0.. ·h.-tGo.' ()-\' ~os M:nlJ\.i-es . \r0o..+·u Wo..S
(.\<o.r-+~rOv.~h(:)v-.t ?\Ar.3e.. -?""'r-0~ ~n~eJ.. ",.,J-.s~m?k~ IN (1.(,<" (.0) ) '(.c.te 01.. a. t-~'io
U-e?th +¢ V0o..~<.r (A{t~(' ?u..'~c. \NIA~ ,g, KS
L-et\ sitt. 0..1-1~\..1
L...-_______ --IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
~
0
19
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONr') ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
:~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: ! Q ""o...('t <.r I ~ GroVo,(\l}\\lJCA..i (.1 ~O\ I
Location (well name):!Io..-M_W'--'---_3_1 _______ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: 'To-,nn<.r Htl ll:JIA.-a 7TH
Date and Time for PurgingjL-'d-_/_l /_~_D_" ____ -I and Sampling (if different) A//At Io..-_~ ________ ...J
Well Purging Equip Used:l]Jpump o@ bailer
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance!I-__ q_~q"":""-__ ...J!)lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj b~. Sq
Conductance (avg) IlbLj
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
I ~/A Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '--_________ -'
pH Buffer 4.0 Y .O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 130.06
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 LlO.)O 1(·653h)
3" Well: 1-. _O __ --'.(.367h)
7. ;;2.1
Well Water Temp. (avg) , Id.-Al Redox Potential (Eh) 'L---3_&> __ .-J TurbiditYL-1 _0 __ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event)I -(;~
Time 11Y3a I Gal. Purged , '60.?-q I Time I IL13J I Gal. Purged I ~O ·S~ I
Conductance I 1"1 £:,;2.. I pH I 7-?\ , Conductance In(£' I pHI '·~ I
Temp.oC I \'(1-.. c.l\\ I Temp.oC 1 \;t.A3 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3~1 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '-SoD I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I H31-I Gal. Purged I <60 .7:2.. I Time 1\1...133 I Gal. Purged 1 ~O.q9 I
Conductance 1 I]Ck I pHI 7 ').J)... I Conductance I 17 73 I pH I 7'#2-} I
Temp.oC 1 IA.") I Temp.oC 1 ':l-·~4 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I '37'"\ 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) I '371 I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ~ 1.37 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I . '?-\f T=2V/Q= 13bGl.59 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablAWAL J sd Dt vOGs.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs lEI 0 3x40 ml 0 J9 HCL f1
Nutrients I!l 0 100 ml 0 I!I H2SO4 EJ
Heavy Metals trJ 0 250ml 'E 0 HN03 El
All Other Non Radiologics l!1 0 250 ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha i!1 0 1,000 ml !J 0 HN03 "'El
Other (specify) rEI 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
L-CN:fQ.\ J:'(\or~(i\fI~() If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Arr:.:Jt:A 0\,\ ~:1t' 0...1 O~lO. T~nl1e.r" H()\lJA~ pr<,~cI\1 ~()r p\j.,(~t: o.f)rJ.. ~o..Mp1",,~ evc.n1.
F\J-('~~ b~o." 0-.+ o~o . fv..r~<A wc..l\ ~cr ~+o-\",\ ~ '3.75 ",,:nv,:t<s ,
\0",,-\~r" I.:)~ M"S,t\>\ 6\-(Ar -rhr()~"'o\)",-t r-V\r~~. Pv...I~~ "C.(\o.~~ o..r'\c;\ ~o...J'Y\f1-c::, I,.)c.('-(,
Loll c::c.tc~ 0... t P1~5 , D-c:.f+h t-c v.JO\..¢u 6..~U p\A~~ \.0~ I J,&-S
L -G.}t ~ ~ i (. u-.-t \ Y SO
L-_______ ---IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
t1
0
19
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date; 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OENISONr:J. ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[ '-I See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 11$" ~r\-"Gr &-ro"","'J. \.A)o-i-~r ~o"
Location (well name):1-1 __ M_w_-_3.:2.......:....;~ ______ ----J
Sampler Name
and initials: I -r;,r'I(1a HoI! J A..!1/111
Date and Time for Purgin~ -;;.../ q J :;).011 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IT!] pu m p or(]] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L--Q....:...-E_D ____ .......J
I f\AvJ -:27 Sampling Event I G>'-'.M·\.c.d,:1 c,.\J Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '--_______ ....J
pH Buffer 7.0 7-0 pH Buffer 4.0 LJ .O
Specific Conductancel-I --,-9~-,-q-'--__ .......JII-4MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.O 1 ft): 1 '3~.-SO
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 7 b _ 2. g Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 3~. 71 1(·653h)
3" Well: 6 (.367h) 1.....--"'-_----'
Conductance (avg) '-\oss pH of Water (avg) (0.0\
Well Water Temp. (avg) Redox Potential (Eh) I /1 Turbidityl ~. ~
Weather Condo Ext') Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 -B'0< I
Time I l~tS I Gal. Purged 17? -b4 I Time I 131b I Gal. Purged 17 'J... a. \ I
Conductance I 4D5;;l I pHI ~.oy I Conductance I ~ObO I pHI b.O\ I
Temp.oC I J3.Qo I Temp.oC I \3· g"l I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 7 8 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I /1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I g.S I Turbidity (NTU) I g.7 I
Time I )~17 I Gal. Purged I 7 3. l;;l I Time I 13 1& I Gal. Purged 113 .3Y I
Conductance I '-lDS?.. I pHI b.OC I Conductance I '-\0 S~ I pH I 5.Q'f I
Temp.oC I r~·8 b I Temp.oC I 13.85 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 77 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 7fo I
Turbidity (NTU) I :0.1 I Turbidity (NTU) I ~.b I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 73~ 7 s gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1 • :lJl T=2V/Q= 133.8'.3.5 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L..._.N-,/._'A ______ ---l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha DI 0 1,000 ml rn 0 RN03 rn 0
Other (specify) el 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
r,d~,-PH If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
r ,~ See instruction
Arri\leJ. on ~it-e f-1 073~. _ -r;..1'\f\~r 1-loll:J~ p ..... es.el"l-t -\0/ p\.Af"~~ "l.ncA ..sa.J'V\pl~ ~vel'\t.
PlAr~~ b-e~ ... (\ 0.1-071-10 ?\A(~<'~ we1\ ~()..-0.. ·hA,o..\ eX 31..\0 M;nv.t'G~. Wo-.1-~r ~AtA
\J~(~ \',.\-\.\'(, G{)\Oi'o..~;O¥\. ~\.\'(~~ -e..Y'lde~ tk.YlJ. sarV1rl< w as c61 led-ed ~+ 13 ~O.
D-C~h 1-CI 'Wo...-\-~r o...q.C( fl.A.r.:j.e 1..0~ ~~.Sq
Le.~ s~i G 6-.t )~b
-I-, ________ .....JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 OENI50NI)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I 1 ST Q~CA.Mc.r Grou.l'\()\ \I0, .. :\<r d-.,C II
Location (well name):II-_M_W_-_3_'-I...:.....-_______ -l
Sampler Name
and initials: l:::rciflMf Holl.J~ /-TH
Date and Time for Purgingj ..... ~_/_I b_7_~_O_II ____ --' and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJpump 000 bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event I Q~/).der~ &-'vJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I-I_M_W_-_~ ____ -.I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0 Ll.O
Specific Conductance .... 1 _q...;...~..:....9-'--__ ....I1 ~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): IIDGI,IO
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 107. f:.4 Casing Volume (V) 4" Well: (.653h) 1--"":=-4-----i
3" Well: Q (.367h)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 113.5 " Redox Potential (Eh) ..... I95_~-=----_-' TurbiditylL..........;.,ll ___ l _----'
Weather Condo Llou~ Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 I D<.
Time IO~ I Gal. Purged I 4 I Time I Og:;l:9 I Gal. Purged I -.5 I
Conductance I ~~3~ I pHI ro.b7 I Conductance I Y2>::lb I pH I b.S,3 I
Temp. DC IIY.51 I Temp. DC I \~.g.~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~O I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~Sj I
Turbidity (NTU) I II <'::" I I Turbidity (NTU) lllO .b I
Time I D3:f..h I Gal. Purged I b I Time I08d-,i? I Gal. Purged I 7 I
Conductance Iq3~ I pH I 6.1$9 I Conductance I ~31~ I pH I ~.yq I
Temp. DC 11"5 • "5 I I Temp. DC I I;'.S~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 ~~l I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 'J..fo] I
Turbidity (NTU) I 11;,1. J I Turbidity (NTU) I }O].l I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 _-'-1 ___ --' gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two 'casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = 1-1 ____ --' T=2V/Q= I !
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labj AWA \... 1 s d Of \JOG~
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 'El 0 3x40 mI 0 ]g HCL ~ 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100mI 0 ~ H2SO4 rJ 0
Heavy Metals IE 0 250 ml 'fl 0 RN03 lSI 0
All Other Non Radiologics fa 0 250 ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 1'1
Gross Alpha frI 0 1,000 ml '!J 0 RN03 rg 0
Other (specify) IE 0 Sample volume 0 'Fi1 0 ~
b-GY\eroJ 1JIO(~()..(\ ~ c.~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Arr"\Je~ 0\'\ ~'A( o,.-t O~oS.T,,~ntr-, G-6.fr\r')I R~h (A:('C!.. 0-11 pr-e~n1-fi:) bo.;l MW-3 LI.
.s+IA'(tc~ ~o b~\ \ 60..~ ogO~ . 1:>C7-.' J-!~ (10. -ta+~1 of' 7 6-~lIov'ls.. v,JD..h:.I" WGl~ fi\ 1:+-+ k
~'Ir\-~: Dnc.fI w{ ~(\-.-t;\le~ ~+~bk pq r~rYlehd ~tArV1fl-c.S
D<.pth ~b \..Jo..-t~r "..rt1:r IJdl V:>CA.~ b,,;I(~ W~~ 10,. bS.
LeH S:te. o,,~ 0&45
'--_______ -I!Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
uJO'( P\A./I-(d. At 08'30.
2 of 2
Mill., GroundVjatf!r DiKharge Permit Date: 03/n{2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan CQAPI
I
I
I
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENTl
GENISO.!). .4 WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ,~~, See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I f,;,-Q v..cl..r ·t(.r &ro\Jo.(\fA Wo..\.er ;z..OI \
Location {well name):IL--.....,,;;,M....:..:..:vJ:....-....:;3~5;;......-_______ -..I
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~ nner I1li j I ;'4.~ I,om
Date and Time for Purgin£l1,.;~~/..;,..I"\~/..:::~~O~\_1 ___ ----' and Sampling (if different) ;S/I.5/£OIl
Well Purging Equip Used:OOpump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I G-r:y.nA, \=b.s
Sampling Event I Qv.a)..rterl:1 W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I M W 35 ~
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 40
Specific ConductanccL,..,! __ q.L..SJ...~.>---_--'IJ!MHOSI em Well Depth(O.Olft): ~4.50
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 11 J",. '4~ I Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 7 8h 1(.653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) '---"'----'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) __ I ...... 11_4.;...:\_----' Redox Potential (EIl)1 3 :30
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)! ' 3C>c.. I
Time I cq;?.~ I Gal. Purged I 3 .b j I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 13:A9 fu I pH 11 .11 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. "C I II '1 \ I '.
Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Ell (m V) I 33 (:) I Redox Potential Ell (mY) ! I
Turbidity (NTU) I JL'L~ I Turbidity (NTU) I J
Time I I Gal. Purged ! I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) ! I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A lof2 capturx' (OMPUIIL! WITH ................ ~.UHCTIONAlITY
Mill.' Ground"'!ater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1...1 _·7;......;::3~b::...· __ -J
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (0), in gpm.
$/60 = 1-1 -...L.11.L.-_-.J
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = 1 ' 'i.?. 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
IfweH evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabI AWAL. I set c..f"VOC :':l
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type ofSamplc if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs ~ D 3x40 ml CJ lZSI HCL ts
Nutrients S1 0 100 ml 0 [!) H2SO4 B
Heavy Metals ijI 0 250 mt ~ 0 HN03 S
All Other Non Radiologies ijJ 0 250 m1 0 ~ No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha &I 0 1,000 m1 IE 0 HN03 T2l
Other (specify) SI 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
G-etle. ... o..\ :IT'o~()""i(S Ifprcscrvativc is uscd, specify
Type and Quantity of
Pr~ser\'ati"e:
g See instruction
ilComment
Arr,'\J41 A.-1 o'W; c/.".rr.n i'"lmt'r ~na R.:?J'" :'c.h \c(rYI~n or. ~,~~ to pu~~t': well .
r "'(~<:: bGClfl a.:~· oq~ PVor~{a. Well -+c;,r ~b. Secane.1:) i0~ta wA..S rV10'.ltr~ dc,~r P\Ar6~o. w~11 rfi(~~ fv.r~c c::-nc.\ecl "'~ Oll).b Le~' ~:+c C\t O'i3:l,
i\rr ;v~ on :'1-tC CA...} 1:l30 "D-"ner , (,.....,r '·."I , Md. R~() ~l on s,-4c h, ~Ctltlplc ~cl J
:>o:...Mpks We,('e bl;\.;Iti\. tlt UYD . CA. ~o..r~<tGL<: f ""MP I..1cu I>.~ca ..to f dtc r J..J..'C G-ro.s.s J\1f'h~
C\.l'\tA hCt.l\J~ l't)e1",1.5 . Oq)~h ~ I..:)c..tcr bC'S;-ol'~ ~v."'p (c \.00..<:> I IJ .~· 'L~ c -I-.t \"'\~c:. Wo>.tc. Wo..s ~\rb I. --J I c: 0; f?'J:)
L.....-_______ --1IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
N
CJ
0
0
III
0
Ii]
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater A 20f2 capturx· 'OM""BLE WITII,...,............,k-.UNCTION~LITY
• Mill· Gro!Jndwat@r Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 ReI!. 6
,
i 3
I
f
Groundwater Monitoring QuaJity Assurance Plan (OAP)
ATTACHMENT I Attachment 1
I)ENISONI) J WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL ',J See in~tru~tion
l._ MI~ES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUl''D WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I $ t OVQ...C" ~e..C Vr-OVA"'Id ..... te..r 70\\
Location (well name); ... , :...;v\~W~-_-S...::....5LoRu...... ______ --,
Sampler Name
and initials:
Date and Time for Purgin~ ;t II Y I ?'Q i \
Well Purging Equip Used: ~ pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I Q UP-I" tt;..clY 61d
pH Buffer 7.0 ... 1 7~~>oGD __ ---,
Specific Conductance .... 1 ....J9L..::9.1...9.L.-__ ....JIIJ.MHOSI em
Depth Lo Water Before Purgin~ AlIA
Conductance (avg) L...' ...:..;":...;. . ..;..l ______ -J
and Sampling (if different)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 11"\ W -;7£
pH Buffer 4.0 Iy.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): I #IA
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~_D~_-tI(.653h)
3" Well: Q . (.367h)
8.95
Wen Water Temp. (avg) 11ft. 15 Redox Potential (Eh) I ?Oct 0 Turbidity,-I-",Q~_-,
1
Weather Condo I ~'
.:? vV\V\.y Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)l -3 0 (., I
'----~----------'
Time 10 B;tQ Gal. Purged 1-1 ..... 1 5,u,O"'--___ Time 1 I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1-1 I:...:.I.:;.~ J-i _---..I pH 1 5.95 Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I ''If 75 Temp. "'C I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) L J
Time Gal. Purged 1..1 ___ --' Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance pH,-I ___ --, Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC Temp.oC I I
Rcdox Potential Eh (mV) ,-I ___ .... Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater .A ~ lof2 capturx' COM'ATI8LE WIT"~~I'UNCTIONALIT>
• Mill· Gr~undwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwilter Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged .... 1 ...... 1~5.,.;:Q~ __ --'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
5/60 = 1 ..... 1 ..... 7"---__ --'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I /\//A I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) v iA I
M A ., Ifwell evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabJ A LV A L-y,,?'S
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type ofSampJc if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs IBI D 3x40ml D m HCL ~
Nutrients I}g D 100ml 0 IX! H2SO4 181
Heavy Metals !XI 0 250 mJ rs 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 181 0 250ml 0 1:'1 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha m 0 1,000 mI ri!I 0 HN03 ~
Other (specify) JiI D Sample volume 0 ~ 0
Gt!-AU'{)o.. \ 1: ""'0 i O,ll.AILfd
Ifprcscrvati\'c is used, specify
-...J Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
I ~COllunent
See instruction
Ar.-('-·,v ,,)... o{\. .nh_ ,,1-0800, 'o..oi\.v'\.e.r, 6c..("1'~,/'\,. tl.~ K:yC\.t\ >. VII\-$'h~ .... '~(!I.r {'i/\.s~l-~.
(JVM.peJ. 50 &~Ho.A.s ,,~ Ac.~~ L-JA.tt.r, 50 bC',l\o,,~ o ·p So~P w~+ er, o.~ .50
6""lIoA"> o~ O.I. t..),,,te..i.5c..M f\e-.s we.re.. t~~w.... o..t Df?:J.O. l-e.fr .sd-e,.. IXr
~ _______ ..JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Me$a Mill
N
D
0
0
iii
0
[ia
Field Oata WOrk5hf!et ror Groundwater .A 2of2 capturx' COIIUlIBU WITH/",~b--'UHC110NALITY
mill· Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (UAP)
" . ~
: OENISO,}) J: ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment I
1~' Sec instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I I ~T Q w-...t~ r G-rO~fld. Wed", r ~o I (
Location (well name):I'--.... /V,"'-'W~-"""f.A ...... _______ -'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~nn-er /-}c/l,'J"';tJnf
Date and Time for Purgjn~ ;U 'b/;101 , and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [QJ pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
I I MW·~b Sampling Event 4>,,),().rt <.l'l.l;j G-W Prev, Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-_______ --.J
pH Buffer 7.0 7·0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance 1L.---,'1..:..'f'l.L.-__ ......I1 j.lMHOS/ em Well Depth(O.Olft):
Depth to Water Before PurgiDgI,-_-.;O~_ ... 4" well:~_6 _____ -II(.653h)
3" Well:. Q ,<-367h)
Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) 10·1 pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 14 O:;l Redox Potential (Eh)1 ;;l.2k. TurbidityJ-l---"c~_-I
Weather Cond, Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event,! g~
Time 112SGl I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged ! I
Conductance I 10 .1 I pH ! ~,'i3 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I 19 b el. I Temp. DC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~b I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I b I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp. DC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Oatil Worksh~et for Groundwater .A 10f2 capturx' COMrn,"u W'TH/,-UU'..v-'UNCTIONALITY
Mill-Grourldwater Discharge Permit DatI!: 03/22/2010 Rl!v. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality AssuranCI! Plan (OAP}
Volume of Water Purged 1-1 _....;O::;.-._~--I gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = 1 0
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 6 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) Q
Ifwell evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Thlll1 Energy Labf ... A'-'-W=-______ -'"
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if othcr than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs GI 0 3x40 m.l Cl 6CJ HCL bl Cl
Nutrients GI Cl 100 ml 0 l!1 H2SO4 lEI 0
Heavy Metals Ii;Zl 0 250ml Ili:I 0 HN03 [!J 0
All Other Non Radiologics ISZl 0 250ml 0 121 No PreseIV. 0 I!g
Gross Alpha BI 0 1,000 ml iii 0 HN03 1m 0
Other (specify) qJ 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 So
&cneru.\ :l:no ~o..J\iL) I f preservative is llsed, specify
Type lind Quantity of
Preservative:
J
I . " ::
G ~ "Comment
See instruction
Arr:uet,\ In l..o.b oJ .. l;;t5S .. ~l1ncr R6i1:'~~ pr(,St"II+-+0 coj/~c+ D"I: fj/Cl.t1J.r .
lOO\r-I set eX' po..rG\.:I\I)~~e.rs. ~"rYJple~ WCf'( fv.lleG\ 0..1-1306
LeSrl-'~b 0..:1-1310
'--_______ --1100 not touch this cell (SheetName)
:
White Mesa Mill
Fil!ld Data Worksheet for Groundwatl!r .A 2of2 capturx' CO"."TI.U WITH/,"~rir--'UNCTION"LlTY
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI) J
MINES
ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
[~'~I See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I \ £,;r Qv,o--rtU' &"fov\"(\J\ W Q.. t "C.f'" ~Ol \
Location (well name): .... 1 __ fV.._W_-_6_6 _______ ----'
Sampler Name
and initials: pro..t'II"I<. ... Ho \ \ i J\~ ~::V"Tr\
Date and Time for Purgin~'_?._I_~_/_:;lO_\ , ____ -----J
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I G> ",o-,rt·u-\ ~ Gr vJ
pH Buffer 7.0 7 ·D
Specific Conductance 1-1 _'1_q_~":""'-_----III-!MHos/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ IOb.'l1
Conductance (avg)
and Sampling (if different) AliA ~~----------I
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) <-I _Q_c_D ____ --'
/ MW -1L\ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... ________ -J
pH Buffer 4.0 \.to
Well Depth(O.Olft): \1,-\ .. 00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:/ 30.7'1 /(.653h)
3" Well:I-. _o __ --'.(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \'-I .Of Redox Potential (Eh) I 3()3 Turbidity <-I _4_. y'---_--'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)I -So"
Time I I GaL Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1,------"..<:'....:...\ ...... '6::-\......:..\_-'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm.
S/60 = ..... 1 ,_?-_I_, __ ---'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = 1 ~33.L.\() 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LabjAWI\L \ ~d rI' 00L..5.
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs IE 0 3x40 m1 0 ~ HCL iJ 0
Nutrients I!] 0 100 m1 0 ~ H2SO4 l1 0
Heavy Metals lEI 0 250 m1 Iii] 0 HN03 ~ 0
All Other Non Radiologies ~ 0 250 ml 0 ~ No Preserv. 0 f]
Gross Alpha r£I 0 1,000 m1 1!:1 0 HN03 [) 0
Other (specify) fB 0 Sample volume 0 [] 0 ~
lren<.ro..\ 1:no~()'f\~~ If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
~ See instruction
,_1
L..-_______ ----IIDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of2
Mill· Grol.l?dwater Discharge Pennit Dale; 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
I)ENISO.}) ~ , WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment I
. /.. See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description ofSatnpling Event: I I~T Qv.(,\d~f' 6r~v.I'\c.\ \,\)g.+«.r ;;to 1 ,
Location (well name):IL-,;.tJ._W~-...!7-=O=--_______ --,
Sampler Name
and initials: I -U,nt)<::r Hc.j/,J"',:;\/'nt
Date and Time for Pllrgin~ ::V15/~Oll and Sampling (if different) I--.N:~,/...:;.'A:-... _____ -,
Well Purging Equip Used: U!Jpump o@bailerWellPump(ifotherthanBennet) .... 1 -"Q..o6,...!;:~;;...:n"",-___ --,
Sampling Event I Qu,,;c-t,,('I; (,..W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ,-I_M_W_-_'~ ____ -I
pH Buffer 7.0 1.0
Specific Conductance .... 1 _'tL..l9u'i __ ---I1 JlMHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 70 :3.5
Conductance (avg) ,--_"'=,;)5=--o.q~",,--____ .......
pH Buffer 4.0 y ()
Well Depth(O.Olft): 13Lt 00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:ll--lj ..... I_.5 ..... b---tI(.653h)
3" Well:. c . (.367h)
~.27
Well Water Temp. (nvg) i'~ ,~ Redox Potential (Eh)1 ~03 Turbidityl&....-.:.''''''';O::''----J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. ·C (prior sampling event)1 -3\
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp. bC I I Temp. be I 1
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet fQr Groundwater
Mill . Groundwater Di~charge Permit
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (OAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ~'-t b:}
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
5/60 = I I ptll
ga"on(s)
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,--,AJ:..;;;..:.../',-%1I.-____ ---J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sam pic if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 rnl 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 mt 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Hea vy Melals ~ 0 250ml r&J 0 RN03 m 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 NoPreserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) ttl 0 Sample volume 0 EiI 0 m
~> ,-,,'.\G..\e: If prc'Icrvativc is used, specity
Type and Ql1imtity of
TD~ Preservative:
a 5 . See instruction
~Comment
'--_______ -...IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater ..A 2 of2 capturx COM.ATIBL! WITH/"" __ tir-'UNCTtOHALITT
TabC
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
TabCl
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
January 2011
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: JVlortihl~ GY'olAMl WU-."k-jOo ~)
Location (well name):L-1 _M_W_~_I_l ________ -,
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 ~I'\(I~ 11'0 /I,.J",~ /r1J-
Date and Time for purginmL..........;l 1,---' 1..:....1_f)..D_"'---___ -' and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 Qffp
Sampling Event \f""v.I)..(""~ i'-\Ol"lth 1:r I MW~3D Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.. _______ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _q..:..~..:....'\~ __ --,I /-lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj g 'l. "0
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0
Well Depth(O.Olft): 130.00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 ~.3g 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '--------'
1.44
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 13. ~q Redox Potential (Eh) 11-;2._1\ __ --' Turbidity ,-I _0 __ -'
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)I-:S °L
Time 11155 I Gal. Purged 1 5d...D~ I Time I \15k I Gal. Purged l.s~ .:2'f I
Conductance I 0 c \C, 1 pH I '1.'110 I Conductance I 3615 I pHI 7.41./ I
Temp.oC I \"3.~<& I Temp.oC I Y3 .gC, I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~ I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .:2yt I
Turbidity (NTU) I ./ I Turbidity (NTU) I ·7 I
Time I 1157 I Gal. Purged I Sa.. .31 I Time I 11.5g I Gal. Purged I S:t,7J I
Conductance I '3~o~ I pHI 1 .'13 I Conductance I ~oo~ I pHI 7.1[5 I
Temp.oC I 1'1.~ \ I Temp.oC I 13.11 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~6Z: I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I .2..0~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I .f I Turbidity (NTU) I ,7 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 11-_5_3,;:;"",:",,;,1_6_--.J
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = ,-I ~_~_3_. __ ---,
• ;),17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 .2.'-1'3. \~ 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labf A\l A L loS ~O} of VOL.s 1
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y N
VOCs 13 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL I]f 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals 11§ 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 1)1 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
[J See instruction
Arr:\)t:~ on 5.;~~~} 014b. ""-0-1\""" ~oll:~"~ ?rt:!I~"+ .ror pw~<. o.,,,J, .s~Mf'):"j e\J-ent .
PlAr~~ be'~al"\ o..-t OlbS. ?u. .. ~~ WI!:JI -r~,. ~ tc.hJ of ~Y.5 M;l1lAhj.
\0tAt-r,r .-W(A,.l. £'].::(i.(' h('ou.~~ol.o\\-flJ,'~<' Pv..r~~ e.1'I~(.d" o-nJ... ~IHVlplcS v;>c:re collcc.1c-J cd 1.:2,06.
l ... ~ 51\-(. iA.1' 1~C>7. Ocp¢h tt> \,.') .... h(' ~.n"'c-"' f\Ar~G ~c.S gt:t,ql
'--_______ ----'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
'OENISONF) ~
MINES
ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
, See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I MOfl~h It" GrDv.nlk \}jo..f~r ~o II
Location (well name):L-1 __ M_W_-_I_L.' _______ -'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1""10..(11'1 Cor }j 011; '" .. ~/ 1/4
Date and Time for Purgin~L-_V_I_1 /....:.~_D_I_) ____ --.J and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: [f[]pump or[[] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 ~eo
Sampling Event I J"'T\v..W"~ Mo(\t~ 1 '<1 I {IA vJ-d.£ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-_______ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductancell...--_'1_~_q __ ___l".tMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 1.;1$ .7
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ \D~ .1.5
Conductance (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 13.5,3
Weather Condo
Time 11500 I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I Llog3 I pHI
Temp.oC I )~ .55 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3qi I
Turbidity (NTU) I • 7 I
Time I ) bOd... I Gal. Purged I
Conductance I qD~7 I pHI
Temp.oC I 1'3.~ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3I:J:..t.., I
Turbidity (NTU) I ./ I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 j ~-().:3 1(·653h)
3" Well:L-. _o __ ....J.(.367h)
Redox Potential (Eh) I ~ '----~-:-:-Lj-=3----J TurbiclitylL---_, 7 __ --'
Ext" Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 _ Y iJ ( I
3S.~D I Time 11.s~J I Gal. Purged I :3 b. D~ I
b.36 I Conductance I LjDb.5 I pHI b."35 I
Temp.oC I 1:)·53 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3Y5 I
Turbidity (NTU) I .7 I
:3b.2:3 I Time 1 1503 I Gal. Purged I 36)-L5 I
r;·'37 I Conductance I qOcq I pHI b.~7 I
Temp.oC 1 13 .59 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3I:J) I
Turbidity (NTU) I ' 7 I
1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 3b,L{5 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in f.'Pm . Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I . :;>...n T = 2V /Q = I 11..\7 • 1..5 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytieal Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L....-.N_/:....;1~ _____ ----I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250 ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
F=;d~ PH If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
[j See instruction
AH;\l~t\ on ~;h. jl;,t '~JO. J;I'IYW-H~l1 :Il ... ~ present .~,. Fv.r~( 0.[ fJ,vLIY.
PIA(~c.. be~c." iht l.:l. IS. ?",r~cJ... \N6H ror 0.. }c>h.\ of' \ b~ M;nV\1c)_
-roo\< pCA('aqY\~:rt:~ for r.·~\A ?)1. D:~ ncJ p\J.\\ OIn~ ,s4f)')p)C~ _ )
Pl.\r(:)<. ~nJ.o~ til.r \SD':>. Li!.ft ~;t( e..~ l.507. w",-\,r \,Jo..s. Gkc..r .
DL~~ ,.&1u PV-(~G \A)o.~ \OL.\.SD
'--_______ ---'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
: OENISONI)J~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
~ See instruction WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I M () n H, ''<1 !.rtf) Urld l/\)u..T<r 9,.0 1/
Location (well name):IL--...:...M....:,w_-....;:;..?5--=-________ ---l
Sampler Name
and initials: I '-;:nncf" Ho]J,d""~/71t
Date and Time for Purgin~.L.._l--'I __ t _-_~_()_II ____ -' and Sampling (if different) ;VIA '--~---------~
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event I Vo..nv.o..r~ M o 11th ,'<"\
pH Buffer 7.0 /·0
Specific ConductanceL..I_Cj_q"-q'--__ ...JI~MHOS/ em
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 7 S .1 b
Conductance (avg) 335'"'\ '---------~
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1-1 _Q-,-,-~--,f:J=-______ -...J
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1I-_M_W_->_lJ ____ ----I
pH Buffer 4.0 y .O
Well Depth(O.Olft): L..I _11_5_.0_0 ____ ----'
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 2b.D5 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h)
"-----'
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1:',77 Redox Potential (Eh)1 .2..b~ Turbidityl,--l_, ~'---_-'
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. O( (prior sampling event) I ..... StJG I
Time I ,:;1..';).5 I Gal. Purged I S'd...D~ I Time I \~~ I Gal. Purged I ~.~£j I
Conductance I 33Sg I pHI b..L1 3 I Conductance 13351 I pHI b·LJ~ 1
Temp.oC I 1-:,.'7 I Temp.oC I 13.71; I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~~j I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~,q I
Turbidity (NTU) I '35 I Turbidity (NTU) I .c.r I
Time I I~I I Gal. Purged I 5~.S' I Time I l~g I Gal. Purged I ~.73 I
Conductance I 333y I pHI ?;;,q~ I Conductance I 3353 I pHI b.qq I
Temp.oC I n."78 I Temp.oC I 13.77 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;z..~5 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~'o I
Turbidity (NTU) I .~ I Turbidity (NTU) I .'l I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 5'3.1 C
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = I ~ )\l
ga"on(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ;2.YO·15 !
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labfl-_,A/,-:...../u.A ______ --.J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals (] 0 250ml ~ 0 HN03 fiI
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
~ See instruction
Arr:,,'C't\ Oil .s;t<.."t o~n1s', '1ot.l\n<r' \-loIJ]~~ ?re~c.t\t-for ?v...-~e Ant!. ~4~f\it1~ -Gvent.
f'v.r~L be~/)"I\ ~r O~AS. l\ .... r~'Cb.. I"..)cH SDr ()... tot~\ of ..?,I.J-.S M;nl",-tt~
\k)",h.,. I,.) o.s, ckw +~I'£)~hol.A.t ?W~'t'· rv..r~ ~'(\a~fJ... MIA S~Mf' I eS.
INUc. l.o\\~(,-rc:,;l 0-+ \2.36>. D-£.p~k ~I> \t:)~ (,( I-.+l-cr pv.r!::J((. \,V~5. 77# D~ .
le,~t-SIft, ~ t \;l3b
L...-_______ ---I!Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONF) ~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Mo nth I 1\ &ro~(\a 10~hr :;'0) I
Location (well name):L-1 _M_vJ_--=~C-..::... _________ ---,
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~Me(' Hi) 11 .J ..... /-r/J
Date and Time for PurgingjL-....!..I--l)~~:.....:-~==-D.w1 )"-___ ----1 and Sampling (if different) '-//4-~-~-----~
Well Purging Equip Used: [![]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 0~fllA~r~ MOflth/\I'
pH Buffer 7.0 I ,D
Specific Conductance 11--_~.:....;~:....:~ __ ----,IIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 79.0'{
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L-1_,_vt_W_-_I'-l _____ --'
pH Buffer 4.0 1.../·0
Well Depth(O.Olft): ).;2./-3::>
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Wel1:~--D---tI(.653h)
3"Wel1:. b . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I \4·3.;1.. Redox Potential (Eh) I ~73 Turbidity'-I _o ___ --'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) 1 --5 0 (, 1
Time I oq\.j"l 1 Gal. Purged 1 1 Time Gal. Purged 1-1 ___ --'
Conductance 1 3bJ[.J 1 pHI b·g3 1 Conductance pHI'--__ ~
Temp.oC I Ig·3~ 1 Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 "),,73 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) ,-I ___ ----'
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time 1 1 Gal. Purged 1 1 Time Gal. Purged 11--___ -'
Conductance 1 1 pH 1 1 Conductance pH .... 1 ___ --'
Temp.oC 1 I Temp.oC
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) L-I ___ ~
Turbidity (NTU) 1 I Turbidity (NTU)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged <-I _N....:../'Jo...&?1 ___ -'
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q). in gpm.
S/60 = 1 5.D
ga"on(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 1 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,-_".v,_i.;.....A ______ -,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 11:1 0 3x40 ml 0 ~ HCL ~ 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 ml 0 IZf H2SO4 IS 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250 ml 19 0 RN03 f3 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) 129 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0 ~
t,hlpr·,rlc.
('-<.nc.ro.l :rnor~~ni(. If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
;--D~ Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
Arr;'-l~~ on s;h:. o...t 0 44;;2.. ~rmcr, &t>..rr:'" I R~o.n c;..('(' 0..1\ prc:~~n+ .fo, ~~JV\ f'l;n~ 'G\J4'\+'
.s~M~\Q \/-Jere. ?v..\\~o. 6\1 oQStl. Wt;.+~'" wu.s. G),co.(. Len-~I'h= tJ..t 09054.
1-.-_______ ---JIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OE N I SONr'l ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
./ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 M 0 1)~\, ''3 G-r-ov.nCI \130..1"(; r ~O) I
Location (well name): .... 1 _""_W_-_3;;...O ________ ----l
Sampler Name
and initials: 1 """6.tln~r H"II;J"~/T~
Date and Time for Purgin~ 1/10 /~Ol) and Sampling (if different) L-.:..:.A/.~y.:";'~ ______ --1
Well Purging Equip Used: I][] pump o@bailerWellPump(ifotherthanBennet) L-I _Q_E:_D ____ ---'
Sampling Event l 0:.nv..M~ Mo tI H I A Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event .... 1_M_W_-_~_1 ____ _I
pH Buffer 7.0 7.D
Specific ConductanceL-1 _9.;.-q-"':~ __ ---lI~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 7'. G;,5
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 t..j.o
Well Depth(O.Olft): 11' o. 00
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ;2.1.77
3" Well: ()
pH of Water (avg)
1(·653h)
(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \t.). '" 1 Redox Potential (Eh) 1 ~8q TurbiditYL-I .....;o::::.....-_-,
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)l-l 0 Co.
Time 1 l:;"Ob I Gal. Purged I '13. b\ I Time I \J-.D7 I Gal. Purged I l.\3. ~~ I
Conductance I )..J LI~ I pHI b.~ I Conductance I ~/L/S I pHI b.65 I
Temp.oC I 13 .. Z1~ I Temp.oC I 1'3 .8~ I
Redox Potential Eh (mY) I ~87 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~ '1 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I '~D~ I Gal. Purged I \.\ IJ . 0,5 I Time I ):l.oq I Gal. Purged I ylj.~b I
Conductance I :;l} LJ~ I pHI b.b7 I Conductance I ~L}3 I pH I b.b.5 I
Temp.oC I 13.~l5 I Temp.oC I )3.Q/ I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ;;z..qr I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ;;.71/ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I L5 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged 1 '-i q .'1 <t
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = ,-I _" _;1._11 __ ----'
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ~()().7J 1
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL-_.N.....:,.y.:....;'A'-______ -'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients [)J 0 100 ml 0 O!/ H2SO4 I5iJ
Heavy Metals rn 0 250 ml [)1 0 HN03 ijJ
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
k1 See instruction
Arri\)l!.c>.. On ~;te o-.,-r Og37. --r;.(lt'lc(" Holl,jJ''.i prc..5c./lt for pu.('~c MJ.. ~Mfl :"'J -evcnt.
Pv.("~c. b~~",,, to} O~I{S. 'Pv.("~<:~ 10ell tJor ~ ~o1lA.' ~ 2,oS "tn\J\r<-~.
\0o..tcr \.0~ cJ-C:II..f th(O~~OI.A.T p~r~ c.. t'V.(~f ~nc).eA 1A.f\A, f,o..yVl pi'S \.)~r(
Lbl1eO'C~ 0..:\ UID I D~f}~ ~l> Wr...1 -c.r o...~h.( f",r~:f wc..~ 7~.bS
L..-_______ ----IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONI)~~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 l (~~ See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I PI onfJ) I tt G=rOLAYlJ \0~ f(.r" ~ 0 II
Location (well name):,-I _M_W_-_3_1 _______ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: I"'~tln<"-Hcl/;JeA.'f,J/JJ
Date and Time for Purgin~ ~ S =1~;~7~oI1 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump or@] bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I QeD
Sampling Event l oo..n""",rj MOfl-thJ;:t Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-1_/_/_1'1 _____ ---'
pH Buffer 7.0 7-() pH Buffer 4.0 l-l .O
Specific ConductanceL.1 __ qCi-!.~ __ ---,1 J.!MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 130.0C>
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ ~lll.& Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 3~.73 1(·653h)
3" Well: .v/A (.367h)
'--------'
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 13.S:t,. Redox Potential (Eh)1 33~ Turbid ity L-I -=-1._'f_---l
Weather Condo
Time 114d-5 I Gal. Purged I f50.~.,q I
Conductance 1 18bE I pHI ".S~ I
Temp. DC I 13.'41 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :3:!! 1 I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 1.'\ I
Time /14).7 I Gal. Purged I gOt7-;)...., I
Conductance I 18~] I pHI b . .5~ I
Temp. DC I )3. bl I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 33~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I l.j I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Ext'l Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 LA t; <-
_1°(..
Time I J"J.~ I Gal. Purged I 8'0.50 I
Conductance I 1~"'7 I pHI 6.5'"1 I
Temp. DC I l~ . .sl I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 3.:3;). I
Turbidity (NTU) I I·g I
Time I lyj;g I Gal. Purged I gO.~~ I
Conductance I )g c,<:J I pHI 6.b5 I
Temp. DC I \ -;) . .5 J<, I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3J~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I l·1 I
1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ~ I , ~ 7
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
8/60 = I . ;),oIl
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two ca iug volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I 3bfe.·~ I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy LablL-_"v.;_z_~ ______ ---,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients t!J 0 100 ml
Heavy Metals 0 0 250 ml
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml
Other (specify) 1l:J 0 Sample volume
IDS
Comment
L--_______ ---IIDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
Y N
0 0
0 ~
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ~
Added Type y
HCL 0
H2SO4 l!1
HN03 0
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
I~ See instruction
[.b,.J
IY30,
N
0
0
0
0
0
!!J
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)J~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL I' J See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I Pioll-thl'a Gro...,..t'lJ:W~+~r AD11
Location (well name):LI __ M_W_-_bS ________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: I-r;.l"na Holl,lA .. ~ /iH
Date and Time for PurgingjL-_l_-_'1 _-_2_0_1_' ____ --' and Sampling (if different) A.I//t L-_______ ---'
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event 10"''''~(''d .Mol\thl'<1
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0
Specific Conductance 1 ..... _'1_'¥l ___ ---'IIlMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ 75./ D
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) L-I _Q_B_O ____ --'
I MvJ-11 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '-________ -'
pH Buffer 4.0 y .u
Well Depth(O.Olft): 115.£>0
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 (}k.. DS 1(·653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
b.L\3
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 )).77 Redox Potential (Eh)1 ;;....6~ Turbidityl ' .5 b ~
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)I -5 0 (,
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I OS 3 . ) b gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q) in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I . 'J..17 T=2V/Q= I .;l.YD·/3 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L. __ ...v._;';;_/1,--_____ -,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals m 0 250ml ~ 0 RN03 'tl 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 RN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
[~1 See instruction
'--_______ ----11 Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabC2
Field Data Worksheets Accelerated Monitoring
March 2011
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONr)~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL r ' See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 p\(A.n\... Gro~Y\a \J~+-e"'" ;:2..01l
Location (well name):IL-...JM--'-=-vJ-=----~....;.I ..;...I _______ _____'
Sampler Name
and initials: I ~11T\U' ~o/l,'~~/Tlt
Date and Time for Purgin~ 3/15/2,011 and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: IT[] pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event MOJ)t"hG &W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.I __ M_W_-_I....::LJ:....-__ ----I
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0
Specific Conductance 1-1 _--l'l ..... q--lq __ ---'I ~MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ ~ '1.1 q
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 y.()
Well Depth(O.Olft): 130.00
Casing Volume (V) 4" well:1 ~b.53
3" Well: 0
pH of Water (avg)
1(·653h)
(.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 14.~ I Redox Potential (Eh) 1,---1 0---1,Y_--.I Turbidi tY ..... 1 ----'-O __ -J
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) I :;;l.. 0 <.
Time I 1\'bO I Gal. Purged I S3,Jb I Time I II.SJ I Gal. Purged I 5'3 . .3 8 I
Conductance I ~-'\7 I pHI 7. 'i1 I Conductance I ~-'I~ I pH 17'i7 I
Temp.oC I Iy . ~;;L. I Temp.oC I lq.go I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) [ \51 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I loS I
Turbidity (NTU) I CJ I Turbidity (NTU) I D I
Time IllS.l I Gal. Purged I ~~.!2~ I Time I 1153 I Gal. Purged I 53,81 I
Conductance I ;)...i';)..b I pHI 7,~ I Conductance I :l7)q I pHI 7. qt.J I
Temp.oC I I~· i).;2.. I Temp.oC 11Y.go I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 159 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 103 I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 5'1.;2.S gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . ')...17
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V/Q = I .?..'-IS.OI I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~ A \JA L I;' d or v 0(,)
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs IlJ 0 3x40 ml 0 EiJ HCL ~
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals O!I 0 250ml IE 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
AH ;\l~cl. 0'(\ ~i"t<:. 6..-t Ollie. -]MI'U ~nA (J-M6Y\ r rc:sell.f ~r f'u.f"~~ 4.t1J. -S4.m pJirlj ~\Je..rrf,
?\Ar~e b-e.~(;\'1"\ 6.'+ 07Y5 . Pv.."(~~! Well .tor 0... fO+A.1 oSi :ISO ",FrwJes V0"-+~r LVa.5. c.it!4T
+kroU6hov..t-?~r~e.. Pl..\r~-c ~n4e'" At'lJ.. ~"fV\p lt'~ W!::rc: (.o'I~G+ed 0.+ 115S.
D~p-rh +0 \.\)(A.+er t?.+\'Cr r\>.(~<: 1..0% g4. 3..!)
Len s;t-c 0-...1 ld.-Ol.
'--_______ --'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)~~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL [-See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 M~("c.h Grc)u..n~ \J3",,:ter ;;1..011
Location (well name):L-I __ M_\JJ_-_l_q ______ ------'
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-r""l'IflGr AolI,Jp\!d /TI1
Date and Time for Purgingj 3/11..\ /:2-01) and Sampling (if different) L...-_/V_/1_~ _____ ---J
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump o@bailerWellPump(ifotherthanBennet) ,-I _Q~~,---D ____ ---,
Sampling Event I jJ\onfhl~ G-W Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event I MW-30
pH Buffer 7.0 7.0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific ConductanceL-1 _t1--'--q--l,1 __ ---'I~MHos/ cm Well Depth(O.O1 ft): ,--H_J3_._<4_S_--,II:tK 7 D
Depth to Water Before Purging/ 103. qs Casing Volume (V)
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) I P1.YL\ Redox Potential (Eh) I :s85
4" well:11 b. \ "
3" Well:. b
6·77
1(·653h)
(.367h)
Turbidity,-I .".C>"--_-"
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 qo c.
Time I )LJL\O I Gal. Purged I 3. \,t-\b I Time 114Yl I Gal. Purged 131. (J) I
Conductance I 3~O\ I pHI Co.7e I Conductance I '39 Dl I pHI 6-77 I
Temp.oC I ,q ,q:, I Temp.oC I ,q.Lj3 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~99 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3~~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I () I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 J
Time Ilqq;x: I Gal. Purged I 3 J. 89 I Time I \q43 I Gal. Purged I 3;2... ) I I
Conductance I 3qO~ I pH I Ca.;?; I Conductance I ~~O) I pHI Ca.7£:. I
Temp.oC I lQ,qs I Temp.oC I 1'1,45 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3~(2 I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I :2J S I
Turbidity (NTU) I b I Turbidity (NTU) I Q I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I :)~. S5 gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I . ;;2.1 7
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 193. qs I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L.._N_/ A ______ --J
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
Arr',\)<:J on ~i+-e 0..1-I?.OD . J;nner H()n ;~U.6 pre.~<nt +0 rv.('~~ wei \ .
P\A(,~e.> bej().(\ (At I:US, 'Pv..r~e~ Wd/ for ~ +o~,,\ oJ;' \50 M;r\vct-G$..
w .. \<_ 100..!. G I-a..r + h (0'd'0 v..t PW(\C . .'>0.1"1 pic. Wu'-n o+-r ~ ",;,.,J ~
See instruction
'oc>K. f~r'~W"\·e;hx~ to. ~ ~~ Pit \ ?v.,~-e. ~y1J t!~ ,.J--)'1 Lf£.
D-cfA~ +D \0('\'to' o..~-Cf ~w~e., \,()(AS \04.~) L~+-si}c ~J-ILJ'-I7
L...-_______ ---'IDo not touch this cell (SheetNarne)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISONI)J~ ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 Mo..rc.h GrounJ \lJo...h.(" ;Z:01l
Location (well name):L.-1 __ M_W_-_;l,_~ ________ -.J
Sampler Name
and initials: l=-Ja 1'\ n t:,.r FI 0 III Cl~ If f-I
Date and Time for PurgingJ 3 /;L L-~~3~J~15~/~~~o~ll~-~ and Sampling (if different) IV/A L-_______ ~
Well Purging Equip Used:~pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) I QED '----'---=------'
Sampling Event 1 A()n","h\~ &W ! tAW-II Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.-_______ --'
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .0 pH Buffer 4.0
Specific Conductance IL-_~_q_q:......-_~I /lMHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): 11 105 .00
Depth to Water Before PurgingJ 1LJ. ~ \ Casing Volume (V) 4" well:! ::lG .?-y !(.653h)
3" Well: D (.367h) L.....-___ ~
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 14 . .sCo Redox Potential (Eh) I,-,~:;....;.....:s=---_-" Turbidity I 0 '-------'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) I :;"'0
,-
Time Il~o.S I Gal. Purged 1 53.1b I Time 1 1;;!.Ob I Gal. Purged I S 3. 38 I
Conductance 1 3~O9 I pHI b·9 Y I Conductance I 3;;1..05 I pHI b.83 I
Temp.oC I ILI .56 I Temp.oC I 19.5J I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ;).Sq I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ~~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I 1;1..07 I Gal. Purged I :>3 . .5Q I Time I ]? .. 0 [5 I Gal. Purged I S.3, b I I
Conductance I ?>J..D'J I pHI b.~O I Conductance I ~oJ I pHI <;.71 I
Temp.oC I lY .S7 I Temp.oC I 1Q.5f.:. I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;;.sy I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I Turbidity (NTU) I () I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 54."; gallon(s)
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm. Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
S/60 = I . J.r7 T = 2V /Q = I ;J. Lj I. 8g !
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~'-_~_~_~ ______ --I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 m1 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients 0 0 100 ml 0 0 H2SO4 0
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml 2:1 0 HN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologics 0 0 250 ml 0 0 NoPreserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
U See instruction
A rr;'U-cJ. ()Y) ~i+<.. o..-t 07.53. "Io..nn",.. J.J,,'I:J:J pr~.$U1+ -for ?I.A.G -e "n~ .$~1I1'p 1:~ elJ~..rrf.
'Pv-r~-e. he~o.1\ ",i-O~OO. PlA.,~-t:~ \N-Gl\ .\01'" ~ -\-0+6,.\ Df ;2.50 M:(h.J.~~. 'WlA.ter W~ de().r
thro~hov-.i-the P"'("~e.· ?u,Ge. cnJecl tA()~ SO,rtlpk wo..s C.6lJ~c-+eJ o..t ~ JO .
Dep-th -to ~U-.-ter lAneY' fu.r~~ W(.L~ 7". '=>0
L~~ ~\i<:. 0..1-)J.J b
L..-_______ -----I!Do not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 of2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
OENISOJ) ~ MINES
ATTACHMENT 1
WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
~ See instruction
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 j\I\ 0. (' c..£Ol G-.... o !.An v\ Wo...+e. (" ;2,.011
Location (well name):L-1 ---'-M_W_-_;2._b ________ -'
Sampler Name
and initials: l'Io:nne(' Holl'''GI~/T''/1-
Date and Time for Purgin~ 3/lb/a..Oll and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~ pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) 1 G-rlAndf'a.s
Sampling Event .Mon'fh 19 C;:\fJ I MvJ-.:t5 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event '--_______ -'
pH Buffer 7.0
Specific Conductance ,-I _9_4_9 ___ -'1 )lMHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgin~ ~ 3 . 0 ~
Conductance (avg)
pH Buffer 4.0 y.o
Well Depth(O.Olft):
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:~-o=----lI(.653h)
3" Well:. 6 . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 1 \<a.O;).,. Redox Potential (Eh) 1 :;"'37 TurbiditYL-1 _0...:::....-_--'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 7" <.
Time Il~'3S I Gal. Purged 1 I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance 1 3 L\bS I pH I 0.&4 I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I \b.DOl I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ~~l I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I b I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pH I I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged L-I __ 0 ___ -1
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60 = I 5. CO
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I 0 I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two) <.:>
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated o
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L.. __ M_v._'A ______ -,
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) y N Type y
VOCs ~ 0 3x40 rn1 0 129 HCL ~
Nutrients f1 0 100 rn1 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals t1 0 250 rn1 E 0 RN03 ~
All Other Non Radiologies ~ 0 250 rn1 0 ~ No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha ~ 0 1,000 rn1 ~ 0 RN03 ~
Other (specify) t::J 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
TDS If preservative is used, specify
G h \ or'\ J.c Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
Comment
Q See instruction
Afr;\l~J.
-e0-e1"'+'
W o..1-c",
On s ii -e. ~+ );1.3.:2." -'-~nn~r, G-"rr,'1'\ J R~o.t) (;.1/ 'fre.ser),r-+6 .... "sG.1VJpl.'n;
Too\..-I Sd-6+ J'ar~m~+~f'5, .$~Mflt'.s Werl:. f",J1-e~ (d-1~c.J(j.
wo..S Gleo..(" ~ L~J1 ,5,'t(. 4\t );2..50
'--_______ --'IDo not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
~
0
(]
2 of2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1 OENISONI)~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1 k See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I A ",r,}, GCCW'lJ\ \Ja..+~r ~o 11
Location (well name): ..... 1 _M_W_-_3_D ________ ---'
Sampler Name
and initials: ~1\ne.r +.foil .a~lT+t
Date and Time for Purgingj 3/ I'll ~O II and Sampling (if different) I....-_,;"I/,_V,_A _____ ---I
Well Purging Equip Used:rn]pump o@ bailer
Sampling Event Mof1+h8 GW
pH Buffer 7.0 7.C>
Specific ConductanceL-1 _Q:.....;1....;.4 __ --lII!MHOS/ cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 7 ~. C::. 4
Conductance (avg)
Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IQED
I MW-31 Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event ..... _______ --.1
pH Buffer 4.0 Lj.O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 1 110. OD
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" well:1 :;LI .55 1(·653h)
3" Well: b (.367h) 1....-__ ----'
7.og
Well Water Temp. (avg) 114.YC1 Redox Potential (Eh)1 ;1..C/~ Turbidity ..... 1 _0 __ ----'
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event) I 40 l...
Time 1 1 ILlS 1 Gal. Purged 1 y ~.3 1 1 Time 1\146 1 Gal. Purged I 11.;;2.·S3 1
Conductance I d..().s~ 1 pH 17.01 1 Conductance 120S~ 1 pHI 7.0g 1
Temp.oC 1 14.51 1 Temp.oC 11Y·Ed. 1
Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 ;)...]7 1 Redox Potential Eh (mV) 1 :2..70 1
Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 1 Turbidity (NTU) l 0 1
Time 1 JlYl 1 Gal. Purged 1 4.1..7'1 1 Time Illyg 1 Gal. Purged 1 4 #-. q b 1
Conductance 1 'AOS~ I pH 1 7.D9 1 Conductance 1')...057 I pHI 7.)0 1
Temp.oC I IQ .qj 1 Temp.oC 1 11I.'-I7 I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I ;Lb~ 1 Redox Potential Eh (m V) 1 26Y I
Turbidity (NTU) 1 b 1 Turbidity (NTU) 1 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I 43 .90
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I .~17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T = 2V /Q = I 1 q g. 'b I
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~,-_;1/,_Y._A ______ .......
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as
y N specified below)
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml
Nutrients 1B 0 100ml
Heavy Metals ~ 0 250ml
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 m1
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume
Comment
Y N
0 0
0 ~
~ 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Added Type y
HCL 0
H2SO4 "E1
HN03 ~
No Preserv. 0
HN03 0
0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
~. See instruction Lor£!
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
Arr:~d On sl+< .. + 06;;l.b . "ic:nn<:,.. H.Jlij~ pr e.5"nf.fo,. r"''(j€. a.nJ. -SC<rYlP''''(j e\Jerff.
~v-~~~ 6Zj 0.(\ ~-t OS'30. Pu.r~-e~ Wdl -tor (J... +o+o..( of' ;2..00 M ;nv-t-e.s .
u CI-+e.r \0~ L. )-c.lAr +hro~~00-.-\-pv...\jG . Pv...'('~'C. endc~ o-.nA .50.,.,., p)-c...s w<:1'""
c'oll-c.c.+-c.c\ ",t 1150 . D~.p-t~ +0 W~+e.r ~nc(" pv.('~<. ~~ 7q .~~
Le.Pr ~~~~ ~-t ~ liS ~
'--_______ ---'IDO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
MiII-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 ~ OENISONI)J~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: I fJ\()"-rc.h GrO\.A(\0\\tJo...1er ::2...011
Location (well name):I ..... _M_w_-_3_l ________ --'
Sampler Name
and initials: l~f'I(le.(' ~o II ulC7l.!JJT"~
Date and Time for Purgin~ ..... 3_1_1_4_/_'J.t)_I\ ____ __' and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used: ~pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet) IQED
Sampling Event I MOr"\,",\~ GrvJ Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event 1'---»_/)_1-1 _____ -"
pH Buffer 7.0 /.0 pH Buffer 4.0 q.o
Specific Conductance ..... 1 _9_~....:...9 __ -II~MHOS/ cm Well Depth(O.Olft): I )30.00
Depth to Water Before Purginm bg. g g Casing Volume (V) 4" Well: I 34. q I 1(·653h)
3" Well: 0 (.367h) '---__ -I
Conductance (avg) pH of Water (avg) 7·47
Well Water Temp. (avg) I 14.C:,t Redox Potential (Eh) 1L-3_b_8 __ -I Turbidity ..... 1 .....::O~_-I
Weather Condo Ext'l Amb. Temp. °C (prior sampling event)1 q 0 G
Time I lylS I Gal. Purged I ]~.?D I Time I )'-\~b I Gal. Purged I ]q .:J;;t I
Conductance I IgOo I pH I 7.S~ I Conductance I l~O() I pH 17.I..JE( I
Temp.oC I 14 .6\ I Temp.oC I lY·f,O I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 37b I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I 3~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I Q I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
Time I 14').1 I Gal. Purged I 7 q . (,:) I Time I 19:HS I Gal. Purged I ::Z~. 8S I
Conductance I '79fa I pHI -7.~J I Conductance I I ~QD I pH I 7.YJ I
Temp.oC I Pt~1 I Temp.oC I 1 4 ,~1 I
Redox Potential Eh (m V) I 3 ro7 I Redox Potential Eh (m V) I ">.b~ I
Turbidity (NTU) I D I Turbidity (NTU) I 0 I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I go . ;;l.~
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I .~17
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= 13b7.39 !
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Labl ..... /II._'I A _______ --'
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0
Nutrients ~ 0 100 rn1 0 ~ H2SO4 ~
Heavy Metals 0 0 250ml 0 0 HN03 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 No Preserv. 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0
Other (specify) e 0 Sample volume 0 ~ 0
TD,S If preservative is used, specify
Sv-.\+o..+~ Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
A {"ri~ed. 6 r1 ~it~ c..:+ O~I '-. -r;nn~r ~ .. J J;J~ presen+.ror pu.r<Je.. a.nJ ..sGt MpJ;\j ~\J~(,-f .
'Pv..r~e. 6~o-.n .1-.+ O ~;;2..0, Pv..r~~J. \,Jell to(' ~ +o+o-.l 0+ 370 M :Yl vJ~.
\0(A.te.r ~o.s d eo.r th ro~oV-1-?v.r~<.. ~v-.rC\ c -e.ndeJ. 0..(\0--5c\Mp l<.~ ~t::\<-c.o II cc.+~J t)..~ lL\3D. It:..\l Si t !:, 6\.1-lY36. ~
D~?th +0 \0O>..~t.r ,,+tcr ?V.(~G \0~~ 7;)...3S
"-_______ ----I!DO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater
N
0
0
0
0
0
~
2 of 2
Mill -Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
ATTACHMENT 1
OE N I SONr)~ ~ WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL
Attachment 1
See instruction
MINES FIELD DATA WORKSHEET FOR GROUND WATER
Description of Sampling Event: 1 M(A('Gh (,..l"'ov..no. 'NA.+~(' ~o II
Sampler Name
and initials: 1-r;:",nGT H<:>11 ,-J"j/Tlt Location (well name): .... 1 --'-M_w_-_"..:::.:.o::S ________ --'
Date and Time for Purgingj 3/ J 5/ ~O 1/ and Sampling (if different)
Well Purging Equip Used:@]pump o@ bailer Well Pump (if other than Bennet)
Sampling Event M 0 n+~ 1.:1 6-vJ I MIAJ-JI Prevo Well Sampled in Sampling Event L.. _______ ----J
pH Buffer 7.0 7 .D
Specific Conductance 1-1 _9:......:q~1 __ -.l1 ~MHOSI cm
Depth to Water Before Purgingj 7Y. g I
Conductance (avg) 3;;2..07
pH Buffer 4.0 L].O
Well Depth(O.Olft): 115.00
Casing Volume (V)
pH of Water (avg)
4" Wel1:1 :;l...b.;7..Y 1(·653h)
3" Well:. 0 . (.367h)
Well Water Temp. (avg) 14.56 Redox Potential (Eh) I ;;L.5S TurbiditYL..I ---=:::::o __ -,
Weather Condo Ext" Amb. Temp. DC (prior sampling event)1 ;;.. 0 ~
Time 1 I Gal. Purged 1 I Time I I Gal. Purged 1 I
Conductance I I pH I I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
Time I I Gal. Purged I I Time I I Gal. Purged I I
Conductance I I pHI I Conductance I I pHI I
Temp.oC I I Temp.oC I I
Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I Redox Potential Eh (mV) I I
Turbidity (NTU) I I Turbidity (NTU) I I
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 1 of 2
Mill-Groundwater Discharge Permit Date: 03/22/2010 Rev. 6
Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
Volume of Water Purged I ..s g . :2.S
Pumping Rate Calculation
Flow Rate (Q), in gpm.
S/60= I ·~J7
gallon(s)
Time to evacuate two casing volumes (2V)
T=2V/Q= I ;).Yl·gS !
Number of casing volumes evacuated (if other than two)
If well evacuated to dryness, number of gallons evacuated
Name of Certified Analytical Laboratory if Other Than Energy Lab~L....---..;...v.;":'/':.Lo;4!.-.-_____ .....I
Sample Taken Sample Vol (indicate Filtered Preservative Preservative
Type of Sample if other than as Added
y N specified below) Y N Type y N
VOCs 0 0 3x40 ml 0 0 HCL 0 0
Nutrients 0 0 100mI 0 0 H2SO4 0 0
Heavy Metals !]I 0 250mI ~ 0 HN03 IE 0
All Other Non Radiologies 0 0 250ml 0 0 NoPreserv. 0 0
Gross Alpha 0 0 1,000 ml 0 0 HN03 0 0
Other (specify) 0 0 Sample volume 0 0 0 0
If preservative is used, specify
Type and Quantity of
Preservative:
See instruction
Comment
L...-_______ -----J!DO not touch this cell (SheetName)
White Mesa Mill
Field Data Worksheet for Groundwater 2 of 2
TabD
Quarterly Depth to Water
TIME WELL
1458 MW-1
839 MW-2
942 MW-3
943 MW-3A
912 MW-5
909 MW-11
915 MW-12
859 MW-14
857 MW-15
939 MW-17
1456 MW-18
1452 MW-19
1432 MW-20
1438 MW-22
842 MW-23
829 MW-24
903 MW-25
1252 MW-26
826 MW-27
834 MW-28
921 MW-29
922 MW-30
926 MW-31
934 MW-32
848 MW-33
853 MW-34
846 MW-35
Comments:
Static level
65.29
109.93
83.50
85.55
106.09
89.37
108.76
104.00
106.75
76.04
74.90
51.30
83.97
67.32
117.43
114.81
74.91
78.68
51.09
77.29
102.58
76.83
69.03
76.56
Dry
108.20
112.67
Quarterly Depth to Water
NAME: Garrin Palmer, Ryan Scheirman
DATE: 2/28/2011
TIME WELL
1004 MW-4
1001 TW4-1
1007 TW4-2
900 TW4-3
1258 TW4-4
1012 TW4-5
956 TW4-6
1005 TW4-7
932 TW4-8
10lD TW4-9
1015 TW4-10
1016 TW4-11
906 TW4-12
909 TW4-13
912 TW4-14
1252 TW4-15
1020 TW4-16
934 TW4-17
1522 TW4-18
1320 TW4-19
1248 TW4-20
1524 TW4-21
1026 TW4-22
928 TW4-23
1024 TW4-24
925 TW4-25
952 TW4-26
Static
Level
75.33
63.84
67.11
49.63
69.05
57.15
70.80
67.14
66.90
54.96
57.10
58.20
39.58
46.84
87.99
78.68
64.76
76.56
57.72
81.03
69.35
59.82
54.51
65.83
56.05
46.73
64.52
TIME WELL
1447 PIEZ-1
1500 PIEZ-2
1503 PIEZ-3
932 PIEZ-4
934 PIEZ-5
1513 TWN-1
1000 TWN-2
1005 TWN-3
1406 TWN-4
1523 TWN-5
1039 TWN-6
1518 TWN-7
1021 TWN-8
1245 TWN-9
1250 TWN-10
1422 TWN-11
1418 TWN-12
1302 TWN-13
1311 TWN-14
1254 TWN-15
1407 TWN-16
1400 TWN-17
1012 TWN-18
1431 TWN-19
All depths were checked.
Static
Level
62.04
17.20
41.96
48.92
43.91
49.80
16.05
31.61
38.18
70.10
74.78
89.58
61.81
63.91
81.38
69.57
33.89
46.68
62.79
92.45
48.50
34.59
58.10
52.87
TabE
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Quarterly Sampling
EI\ERGY
.\ t-, ~J I . ;. I ~ • I). ' ..
www.energylab.com
Au/ftIUI£J~SiIu 1m Helena, MT 817-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 . Casper, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette, WY 868·186·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·672·1225 • Coilege Stalion,1X 888-690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
lab ID:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C 11 020544-001
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Analyses
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1.1
0.1
0.1
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Units
pC ilL
pCi/L
pC ilL
Qualifiers RL
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/14/11 09:40
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E900.1 03/02/11 18:26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18:26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18:261 ep
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 44
EN:RGY
.,' ,c..H;.-d '--.~I{ •
www.energyiab.com
Aa/yfIa/ buIIMa ~ 1m
Helena, NT 877-472-0711 • Billings, NT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 sl Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-002
Client Sample ID: MW-3
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Fluoride
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
0.69
40.5
Units
mg/l
ug/L
Qualifiers Rl
0.10
5.0
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/15/11 10:35
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
A4500-F C 02/18/11 15:41 1 jba
E200.8 02/23/11 02:191 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 44
EN:RGY
_ /\t.o_"')r~i~IL;II~ 0-,
www.energylab.com
IM/tIIaI buIIItIa SIIa 1m Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 881-680-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-003
Client Sample ID: MW-3A
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
3730
5770
99.0
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 10:05
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers RL QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D 100 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 11 :00 Ilr
D 17 A2540 C 02/18/11 16:00 1 Imc
5.0 E200.8 02/23/11 04:151 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 44
EI\ERGY
f\(;::)Jo\it.. j/l! os
www.energylab.com
AM/fIIaI ExuIIIIIa SIIu /151
Helena, MT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-890-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-004
Client Sample ID: MW-5
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
29.5 ug/l
Qualifiers Rl
0.30
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/14/11 13:20
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
QCl Method AnalysiS Date 1 By
E200.8 02/18/11 22:021 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 44
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: 1102080-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-ll
Collection Date: 2/212011
Received Date: 2/4/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 21412011 1406h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Brornofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibrornofluorornethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1250h
1015h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GCIMS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 101
460-00-4 80-123 109
1868-53-7 80-124 98.9
2037-26-5 80-125 103
Report Date: 21712011 Page 4 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressec~ Privileges of subsequent use oftbe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EI\ERGY
\ j.",('"
www.energylab.com
AnI/ftIuf ExuIIIta SIRU 1m
Helena, MT 817·472-0711 • Billings, MT aGO· 735·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888·188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-872·1225 • College Station, ]X 888·690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater
C11020163-001
Client Sample ID: MW-11
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
385
70.6
32
0.48
21.2
0.70
NO
6.83
601
1190
7.80
1980
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
63
ND
145
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.42
NO
ND
0.1
0.06
0.09
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mglL
mg/L
mg/L
s.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pCilL
pCilL
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/02/11 12:50
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
0
D
A2320 B 02107111 16:51 1 jba
A2320 B 02/07/11 16:51 1 jba
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 15:571 cp
A4500-CI B 02/15/11 15:12/1r
0.10 A4500-F C 02/07/11 13:191 jba
0.50 E200.7 02/15/1115:57/cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02111/11 11 :50 1 dc
0.1 E353.2 02104/11 16:46 1 dc
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 15:571 cp
0.57 E200.7 02/15/1115:57/cp
50 A4500-S04E 02/10/11 11 :31 fir
0.01 A4500-H B 02/04/11 15:31 Ilr
10 A2540 C 02/04/11 15:35/1mc
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 06:36 1 sml
25 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 06 :36 1 sml
30 E200.7 02115/11 15:57 1 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
10 E200.8 02108/11 06:361 sml
20 E200.8 02108/11 06:361 sml
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
100 E200.8 02108/11 06:361 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/08/11 06:361 sml
15 E200.8 02/08/11 06:36 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 06 :36 1 sm I
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
MeL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 3 of 28
EN:RGY
...... L • I, ,I ~ ! i' •
www.energytab.com
AMJytII:M~s.u 1m
Helena, MT 871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-18&-1175 • Rapid City, SO 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater
C11020163-001
Client Sample ID: MW-11
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-0.668
32.1
31.6
2130
0.930
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
102
106
103
99.0
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier Rl
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
BO-120
BO-120
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/02/11 12:50
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :22 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13 :22 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13:22 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :22 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :22 1 kbh
SW8260B 02/09/11 13:40 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/09/11 13 :401 jlr
SWB260B 02/09/11 13 :40 1 jlr
SW8260B 02109/11 13:40 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 13:40 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/09/11 13:40 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/09/11 13 :40 1 jl r
SVY8260B 02/09/11 13 :40 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 13:401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 13 :401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 13 :40 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/09/11 13 :40 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/09/11 13:40 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/09/11 13:401 jlr
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 28
EI\ERGY ,,'
:\. ,~) I I /\ r <-. f I" '..)
www.energylab.com
AM/ffIt:M rxau-. SIIa 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88B-188-7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-005
Client Sample 10: MW·12
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl . Analyte reporting limit.
QCl • Quality control limit.
Result Units
39.0 ugiL
Qualifiers Rl
5.0
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/15/11 07:50
DateRecelved: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 02/23/11 04:221 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO . Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 44
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
l102168-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-14
Collection Date: 21712011
Received Date: 2/1112011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2111/2011 1137h
Units: )lg/L
Dilution Factor: I
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1300h
0945h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 99.7
460-00-4 80-123 108
1868-53-7 80-124 99.2
2037-26-5 80-125 103
Report Date: 2/17/2011 Page 4 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached cac. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges ofsubsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its stafT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules ofthe trade and of science.
EN:RGY
AI ~)I ' I (,1 II "_I
www.anergylab.com
AMIyf/f:M ~ SIIu '112
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, "IX 888-690-221 8
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab ID: C11020352-001
Client Sample 10: MW-14
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
475
514
20
0.15
151
0.05
ND
11.5
334
2180
7.18
3510
ND
ND
1.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2020
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
61.3
ND
11
0.4
0.09
0.1
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
s.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCilL
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/07/11 1 3 :00
DateRece Ived: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
A2320 B 02/15/11 16 :20 1 jba
A2320 B 02/15/11 16:201 jba
E200.7 02/25/11 12:561 cp
A4500-CI B 02/15/1115:4511r
0.10 A4500-F C 02/11/11 14:141 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 12:56 1 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/14/11 12:28 1 dc
0.1 E353.2 02/15/11 13:05 1 dc
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 12:56 1 cp
1 E200.7 02125/11 12:561 cp
50 A4500-S04 E 02/17/1115:3811r
0.01 A4500-H B 02/11/11 14:36 IImc
10 A2540 C 02111/11 14:29 IImc
5.0 E200.8 02/16/11 23:301 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/15/11 20:11 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/15/11 20:11 I sml
25 E200.8 02/15/11 20:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02116/11 23:30 I sml
10 E200.8 02/15/11 20:11 I sml
30 E200.7 02/25/11 12:56 1 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/15/11 20:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02/16/11 23:301 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/16/11 23:301 sml
10 E200.8 02/15/11 20:11 1 sml
20 E200.8 02/16/11 23:301 sml
5.0 E200.8 02/16/11 23:301 sml
10 E200.8 02/16/11 23:301 sml
0.50 E200.8 02116/11 23:301 sml
100 E200.8 02/16/11 23:30 I sml
0.30 E200.8 02/16/11 23:30 I sml
15 E200.8 02/16/11 23:30 I sml
10 E200.8 02/16/11 23:30 I sml
E900.1 02/23/11 05:251 ep
E900.1 02/23/11 05:251 ep
E900.1 02/23/11 05:251 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 3 of 31
EN:RGY
/. t '.,):. ~', 1'. j /1 ')
www.energyiab.com
AMIIfkM~SIIu 1m
Helena, MT877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&8-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • Collaga Station, TX 888-&80-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020352-001
Client Sample ID: MW-14
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
NC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-0.752
53.7
52.9
3470
1.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
104
110
99.0
102
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/07/11 13:00
DateReceived: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 03/10/11 13:01 1 kbh
Calculation 03110/11 13:011 kbh
Calculation 03110/11 13:011 kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13:01 1 kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13:011 kbh
SW8260B 02111/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :311 ilr
SW8260B 02111/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :311 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :311 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SWB260B 02/11/11 21 :311 ilr
SWB260B 02/11/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/11/11 21 :31 1 ilr
SWB260B 02/11/1121 :31/ ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 31
EN:RGY
/\, " ) r .;\ I \ I ~ I -.
www.energylab.com
AMIIfIat rxc.tIMa SIJu laz
Helena, MT 877·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800·735-4489 . Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 88&·188·7175 . Rapid City, SD 888·&12·1225 . College Station, TX 88&'&90·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C 11020544-006
Client Sample 10: MW-18
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1770
3250
3.49
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/L
ug/l
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/15/11 14:40
DateRecelved: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D 50 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 11 :04/1r
10 A2540 C 02118/11 16:00 lime
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:291 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 44
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102272-001A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: MW-20
Collection Date: 2/16/2011 1045h WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
lose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2118/2011 0930h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2119/2011 1338h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/S030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 108
460-00-4 80-123 105
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 99.4
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 4 of 25
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is Located on the attached cae. This report is provided for tbe exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges ofsubscqucnt use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the rc~publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts DO responsibility except for the due perfonnaDcc ofinspeclion endlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
;, " )II/'ll III' "
www.energyiab.com
ANIrtfuI buIIHDI SI«.t I 1St
Helena, lIlT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOO-735-4489 • Cesper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY B86-888-7175 · Rapid City, SD 88B-&12-1225 . ColiegeSlalion, 1XIBH-BBO-221B
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11020544-008
Client Sample 10: MW-20
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±l
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
217
336
64
0.35
86.9
0.06
4.1
43.6
1260
3140
7.94
5380
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
10
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
6.95
NO
31
0.6
0.1
0.1
Units
mg/l
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mglL
mglL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
pC ilL
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 1 0 :45
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0
0
0
0
0
A2320 B 02118111 19:421 jba
A2320 B 02118111 19 :42 1 jba
E200.7 02/25/11 13:161 cp
1 A4500-CI B 02/28/11 10:59 Ilr
0.10 A4500-F C 02118/11 15:441 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:161 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3G 02125/11 12:161 dc
0.5 E353.2 02/23/11 12:421 dc
0.5 E200.7 02/25/1113:16/cp
1 E200.7 02/25/11 13:161 cp
50 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 11 :05 IIr
0.01 A4500-H B 02/18/11 15:41 IIr
17 A2540 C 02/18/11 16:001lmc
5.0 E200.8 02123/11 04:351 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:35 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:35 1 sml
25 E200.8 02/23/11 04:35 1 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 04:35 1 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 04:35 1 sml
30 E200.7 02125/11 13:161 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/23/11 04:35 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
20 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
5.0 E200.8 02123/11 04:351 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
100 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
15 E200.8 02/23/11 04:351 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 04:351 sml
E900.1 03/02/11 18:261 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18 :26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02111 18:261 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 11 of 44
EN:RGY
''\1 c..H'!"t ,{I ',:0
www.energylab.com
AMIyIfM~SI1Iu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11020544-008
Client Sample 10: MW-20
Analyses Result
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5) 5.69
Anions 71.1
Cations 79.7
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated 5090
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20) 1.06
-The Anion I Cation balance was confirmed by re-analysis.
VOLA TILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control timit.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
108
116
105
84.0
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 10:45
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Units Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
% Calculation 03/23/11 15:551 sdw
meq/l Calculation 03123/11 15:551 sdw
meq/l Calculation 03123/11 15:551 sdw
mg/l Calculation 03/23/11 15:551 sdw
Calculation 03/23/11 15:551 sdw
ug/L 20 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:30 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:30 1 jlr
ug/l 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
ug/l 20 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SWB260B 02/26/11 00:30 1 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW82608 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 00:301 jlr
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 44
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102168-002A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: MW-22
Collection Date: 2/8/2011 1215h WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2111/2011 0945h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2111/20 II 1156h
Units: J.1glL
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 99.4
460-00-4 80-123 110
1868-53-7 80-124 99.7
2037-26-5 80-125 103
Report Date: 2/17/2011 Page 5 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its statT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the adverlisement, promotion or sale of any prodLlct or process, or in connection
witb the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perFormance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
.~, ( ): • "I' ;. •
www.energylab.com
AII/yfkIII £mflll&dtllU 1m
Haiena, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 80D·735·4489 • Casper, WY 881·235·D515
Gillatta, WY 88&·186·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • Collage Station, 1X aB8-6BD-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab ID: Cll020352-002
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLlDES· DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analy1e reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
565
440
57
3.09
803
0.13
2.5
21 .5
258
4490
6.35
6800
ND
2.31
85.0
ND
267
ND
ND
ND
28600
ND
719
130
12.0
ND
1.12
ND
44.4
ND
511
9.5
1.1
0.6
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pC ilL
pC ilL
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/08/11 12:15
DateRecelved: 02/11 III
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
D
D
A2320 B 02/15/11 16:28 1 jba
A2320 B 02/15/11 16:281 jba
2 E200.7 02/16/11 18:22 I cp
A4500-CI B 02/15/11 15:48 Ilr
0.10 A4500-F C 02/11/11 14: 17 I jba
0.5 E200.7 02/16/11 18:22 I cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02114/11 12:30 I dc
0.2 E353.2 02l15/1113:08/dc
0.5 E200.7 02116/11 18:221 cp
3 E200.7 02116/11 18:221 cp
100 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 10:50/1r
0.01 A4500-H B 02/11/11 14:40 1 Imc
16 A2540 C 02/11/11 14:30 IImc
5.0 E200.8 02/16/11 23:371 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/15/11 20:181 sml
0.50 E200.8 02115/11 20:18 1 sml
25 E200.8 02/15/11 20:181 sml
10 E200.8 02/16/11 23:371 sml
10 E200.8 02/15/1120:18/sml
30 E200.7 02/16/11 18:221 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/15/11 20:181 sml
10 E200.8 02/16/11 23:37 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/16/11 23:371 sml
10 E200.8 02/15/11 20:181 sml
20 E200.8 02116/11 23:371 sml
5.0 E200.8 02116/11 23:371 sml
10 E200.8 02116/11 23:371 sml
0.50 E200.8 02115/11 20:181 sml
100 E200.8 02/16/11 23:371 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/16/11 23:371 sml
15 E200.8 02/16/11 23:37 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/16/11 23:371 sml
E900.1 02/17/11 18:041 ep
E900.1 02/17/11 18:041 ep
E900.1 02/17/11 18:041 ep
MCL - Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 5 of 31
EN:RGY
• , I ) r ,,\j ( • ~. •
www.energylab.com
AMIIbI~st.u 1m
Holen., MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatto, WY 88&-188-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • Collage Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
LablD:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Cll020352-002
Client Sample ID: MW-22
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
Ale Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-2.33
105
99.8
6370
1.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
102
106
99.0
101
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/08/11 12:15
DateReceived: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
Calculation 03/10/11 13:02 I kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13 :02 I kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13:02 I kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13:02 I kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13 :02 I kbh
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22 :07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22 :07 I jlr
SW8260B 02111 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02111/11 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02111 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:07 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:07 I jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 31
EN:RGY
/.' )1 .1' I :,' •
www.energylab.com
IMI!f/aI~SIItu 1m
Helena, lilT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 80D·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235·1515
Gillette, WY 888·18&·7175 · Rapid City, SD 888·612·1225 · College Station, IX 881-81D-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020352-006
Client Sample ID: MW-24
Analyses
METALS· DISSOLVED
Cadmium
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
2.78
1.42
Units
ug/l
ug/l
Qualifiers RL
0.50
0.50
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/10/11 08:00
DateReceived: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.6 02/15/11 20:321 sml
E200.6 02/17/11 00:19/ sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 31
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: 1102080-002A
Client Sample ID: MW-25
Collection Date: 2/2/2011 l310h
Received Date: 2/412011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2/4/2011 1425h
Units: Jlg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
lO15h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CI5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 100
460-00-4 80-123 109
1868-53-7 80-124 99.2
2037-26-5 80-125 102
Report Date: 21712011 Page 5 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for tbe exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc cflbe name aflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduclion aflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other thaD for the addressee will be granted only on conlact. This company accepts DO responsibility except for the due perfonnancc of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience4
EI\ERGY
,r, -. )luu( , •• "
www.energylab.com
AMI!fIt:M~SIirCI' 1m
Helena, MT 871·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 888·188·7175 • Rapid City, SO 888·672·1225 • Collage Station, TX 888·&90·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
LablD: C11020163-002
Client Sample ID: MW-25
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLlDES· DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
405
358
30
0.31
119
0.49
ND
9.26
298
1690
7.25
2720
ND
ND
1.34
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
1650
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.93
ND
4.77
ND
ND
0.6
0.09
0.09
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/02/11 13:10
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
A2320 B 02/07/11 16:591 jba
A2320 B 02/07/11 16:591 jba
1.1 E200.7 02/15/11 16:051 cp
A4500-CI B 02/15/1115:14/1r
0.10 A4500-F C 02/07/11 13 :22 1 jba
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 16:051 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/11/11 11 :52 1 dc
0.1 E353.2 02/04/11 16 :49 1 dc
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 16:051 cp
1.4 E200.7 02/15/11 16:051 cp
50 A4500-S04 E 02/10/11 11 :48 1 Ir
0.01 A4500-H B 02104/11 15:441 Ir
10 A2540 C 02/04/11 15:351 Imc
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
25 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
30 E200.7 02/15/11 16:051 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
20 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
100 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
15 E200.8 02/08/11 07:041 sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07 :04 1 sm I
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 5 of 28
EN:RGY
," ",-)I "~I r ',_ ....
www.energylab.com
AMIytIuf~, SIRu 1m
Helena, tIT 877-472-0711 • Billings, tIT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TJ( 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater
C11020163-002
Client Sample 10: MW-2S
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-2.09
42.7
40.9
2720
1.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
99.0
108
100
100
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/02/11 13:10
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :22 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13 :22 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13 :22 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :22 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13:221 kbh
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:161 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:16 1 ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 28
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102272-002A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: MW-26
Collection Date: 2116/2011 1226h
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2118/2011 0930h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2119/2011 1357h
Units: flg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 109
460-00-4 80-123 106
1868-53-7 80-124 105
2037-26-5 80-125 99.8
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 5 of 25
All analyses applicable to the CWAt SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges ofsubseql1ent use oftbe name oftbis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
,~,I (~H;'I ' Jllh ~
www.energylab.com
AIuIyfIt:M ExuIIIta SIIIu 1m
Helena, lIfT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-188-7115 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-680-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
LablD: Cll020544-009
Client Sample ID: MW-26
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±l
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
418
511
59
0.25
168
0.25
0.6
11.2
174
1780
7.65
3270
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
606
ND
1470
ND
ND
ND
7.6
ND
ND
ND
69.3
ND
ND
3.0
0.2
0.1
Units
mglL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCilL
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 12:26
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
D
D
D
A2320 B 02/18/11 19:501 jba
A2320 B 02/18/11 19:50 I jba
E200.7 02/25/11 13:20 I cp
1 A4500-CI B 02/28/11 11 :01 Ilr
0.10 A4500-F C 02/18/11 15:471 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:20 I cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/25/11 12:181 dc
0.1 E353.2 02/23/11 12:491 dc
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :20 I cp
1 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :20 I cp
50 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 12:01 Ilr
0.01 A4500-H B 02118/11 15:46 IIr
10 A2540 C 02/18/11 16:00 Ilmc
5.0 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:42 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
25 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 04:421 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 04:42 I sml
30 E200.7 02125/11 13:201 cp
1.0 E200.8 02123/11 04:421 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
20 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
5.0 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
100 E200.8 02123/11 04:421 sml
0.30 E200.8 02123/11 04:421 sml
15 E200.8 02123/11 04:421 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:421 sml
E900.1 03/02/11 18 :26 I ep
E900.1 03/02111 1 B :26 I ep
E900.1 03/02111 1 B:261 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 13 of 44
EN:RGY
•• ' \) 11 .A~ 1 (.-..:.J I [ ~ I
www.energylab.com
AtJMytkM~ss-1m Helena, MT Bl1-412-e711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
GiIIBlte, WY 888-188-1115 • Rapid City, SD 888-612-1225 • Colisge Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
LablD:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C 11020544-009
Client Sample ID: MW-26
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 - 1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
1.67
45.7
47.2
2930
1.12
ND
ND
ND
730
ND
ND
10
NO
NO
NO
112
120
109
B4.0
0-RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 12:26
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 03/14/11 08:231 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 08 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 08:23 1 kbh
Calculation 03/14/11 08:231 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 08:231 kbh
20 SW8260B 02126/11 07:031 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 02126/11 07:03 1 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 07:03 1 ilr
D 100 SW8260B 02/26/11 05: 151 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 07:03 1 ilr
20 SW8260B 02/26/11 07:031 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 02126/11 07:031 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 07:03 1 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 02/26/11 07:03 1 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 02/26/11 07:031 ilr
BO-120 SWB260B 02/26/11 07:031 i'r
70-130 SWB260B 02/26/11 07:03 1 ilr
BO-120 SWB260B 02/26/11 07:03 1 ilr
BO-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 07:03 1 ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 14 of 44
EN:RGY
i\ l .• ), • I ~ I ~ .1 .,. '.
www.energylab.com
AIIIIyfaI~SIra 1m
Halena, MT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Cll020352-005
Client Sample ID: MW-27
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions;
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
46
6.0
455
1090
0.7
0.1
0.1
Units
mglL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/09/11 12:00
DateRecelved: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
A4500-CI B
0.5 E353.2
10 A4500-S04 E
10 A2540 C
E900.1
E900.1
E900.1
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
02/15/11 15:51 fir
02l15/1113:13/dc
02/17/11 15:52/1r
02111111 14:31 Ilmc
03/02/11 18:26 1 ep
03/02111 18:26 1 ep
03/02/11 18:261 ep
Page 10 of 31
EN:RGY
... "ll,,"d e l,1 ~
www.energyfab.com
AMI1fkIII~Sbu rm
Helana,lIT 877-472-0711 -Billin,s, MT BOO·735·4481 -Casper, WY 881·235-1515
Gillette, WY 888·116·7175 • Rapid City, SD 188·&72·1225 • Collage Station, IX 881-690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-007
Client Sample 10: MW-28
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
114 mg/L
Qualifiers RL
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/14/11 11 :20
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
A4500-CI B 02128/11 10:5611r
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 44
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client: Denison Mines
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Lab Sample ID: 1102080-003A
Client Sample ID: MW-30
Collection Date: 2/1/2011 1240h
Received Date: 2/4/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2/4/2011 1444h
Units: I!g/L
Dilution Factor: I
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1015h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CI5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 102
460-00-4 80-123 110
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 102
Report Date: 21712011 Page 6 0[21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are porfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, orrcproduclion of this report in coonection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with tbe rc-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on cootacL This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
J\, ,()!-J.d l,:/1 "_.
www.energylab.com
AM/fIIaI rwu.-SIIu 1m
Helena, MT871-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Lab 10: C11020163-003
Client Sample 10: MW-30
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TOS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
185
263
134
0.34
67.5
0.05
16
6.56
102
796
7.47
1530
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
67
NO
38
NO
NO
NO
34.7
NO
NO
NO
5.97
NO
NO
0.2
0.07
0.09
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/01/11 12:40
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date I By
0
0
0
A2320 B 02/07/11 17:22 I jba
A2320 B 02/07/11 17:22 I jba
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 16:09 I cp
A4500-CI B 02/15/11 15:1611r
0.10 A4500-F C 02/07/11 13:25 I jba
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 16:09 I cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/11/11 12:00 I dc
E353.2 02/04/11 16:59 I dc
0.50 E200.7 02/15/1116:09/cp
0.57 E200.7 02/15/11 16:09 I cp
20 A4500-S04 E 02/10/11 11 :54 I Ir
0.01 A4500-H B 02/04/11 15:49 I Ir
10 A2540 C 02/04/11 15:36 Ilmc
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
25 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02108/11 07:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
30 E200.7 02/15/11 16:09 I cp
1.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07: 11 I sml
20 E200.8 02108/11 07:11 I sml
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
100 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
0.30 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
15 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:11 I sml
E900.1 03/08/11 18:09 I ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18:09 I ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18 :09 I ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
o -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 7 of 28
EN:RGY
t,· ., ,I • j. I ( : ~,_ ~_
IIMW.8IIefgytab.com
AM/rIit:II ~ SIta 'lSI Helena, MT 877-472-0111 • Hillinls, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-188-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-172-1225 • College Statfon, TX 118-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater
C11020163-003
Client Sample ID: MW-30
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chlorom ethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
-2.68
24.6
23.3
1550
0.990
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
102
102
100
105
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/01/11 12:40
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
aCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :23 1 kbh
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:521 ilr
SWB260B 02/09/11 14:521 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14 :52 1 ilr
SWB260B 02/09111 14:52 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:521 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:52 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:521 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:521 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:521 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:52 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:52 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/09/11 14:52 1 ilr
SW8260B 02109/11 14 :52 1 ilr
SWB260B 02109/11 14:521 jlr
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 28
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102080-004A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: MW-31
Collection Date: 2/1/2011 143Sh
lOlSh WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/4/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 214/2011 IS03h
Units: /lg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrah ydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
SUIT: Dibromotluoromethane
SUIT: Toluene-d8
Contact: 10 Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 101
460-00-4 80-123 110
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 103
Report Date: 21712011 Page 7 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are pl.-rfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located 00 the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent llSC of the name oftbis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other Ihan for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faitb
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscicnce
EI\ERGY
.'\1,)11,,1 )'.1 ".
www.energyfab.com
AM/ftk6I Exu/IINu SII!u IW
Helena, MY 877-472-0711 • Billings, MY BOO-735-44B9 . CasPfII, WY '.8-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-188-7175 • Rapid City, so '8B-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
LablD: C11020163-004
Client Sample ID: MW-31
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
211
168
145
0.83
79.6
ND
21
5.75
91.6
538
7.66
1220
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
64.6
ND
ND
ND
5.77
ND
ND
0.4
0.08
0.09
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/01/11 14:35
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
A2320 B 02/07/11 17:30 I jba
A2320 B 02/07/11 17:30 I jba
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 16: 13 I cp
1 A4500-CI B 02/15/11 15:1911r
0.10 A4500-F C 02/07/11 13 :28 I jba
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 16:131 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/11/11 12:021 dc
E353.2 02/04/11 17:01 I dc
0.50 E200.7 02/15/11 16:131 cp
0.57 E200.7 02/15/11 16:131 cp
20 A4500-S04 E 02/10/11 11 :56 Ilr
0.01 A4500-H B 02/04/11 15:51 Ilr
10 A2540 C 02/04/11 15 :36 Ilmc
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
25 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
10 E200.8 02108/11 07:17 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
30 E200.7 02/15/11 16:131 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
20 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
5.0 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
10 E200.8 02108/11 07:17 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
100 E200.8 02108111 07:17 I sml
0.30 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 1 sml
15 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
10 E200.8 02/08/11 07:17 I sml
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
E900.1 03/08/11 18:091 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 9 of 28
EN:RGY
1\ '-, ;1, .... 1 ~ l.( ~',
www.energyl~b.com
~E'""-SkI '151
Helena, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WV 888-235·0515
Glllatte, WV 888·186·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • Cellaga Station, TX 888-890·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater
C11020163-004
Client Sample ID: MW-31
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-3.00
20.3
19.1
1240
0.980
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
102
109
100
101
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/01/11 14:35
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02116/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :23 1 kbh
Calculation 02/16/11 13 :23 1 kbh
SW8260B 02/09/11 16 :40 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09111 16 :40 / jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09111 16:40 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:40/ jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16 :40 / jl r
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:401 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16 :40 1 jl r
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:40/ jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 16:401 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 28
EI\ERGY
f\ A;'" It.j;'; ••
www.energylab.com
AM/tfIaI~ SIIu IIU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Caspar, WY 888-235-0515
GiIIBlte, WY 88&-18&-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-812-1225 • Collage Station, lX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
LablD:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020352-004
Client Sample ID: MW-32
Analyses
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1.5
0.2
0.1
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Units
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Qualifiers RL
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/09/11 13:20
DateReceived: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E900.1 03/14/11 21 :331 ep
E900.1 03/14/11 21 :331 ep
E900.1 03/14/11 21 :33 1 ep
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 31
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102272-003A
Client Sample ID: MW-34
Collection Date: 2116/2011
Received Date: 2/1812011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 211912011 1416h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
0830h
0930h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 110
460-00-4 80-123 104
1868-53-7 80-124 102
2037-26-5 80-125 99.2
Report Date: 2122/2011 Page 6 of 25
AIL analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attacbed COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges or subsequent use of the nalne or this company or any member of its staff, orreproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication oftbis report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faitb
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
/\'~()I~~"'l (ddl ':..
www.energylab.eom
AMIytaI ExaIIMcI SIttu II!Z
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 . Casper, WY 888·235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&·188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·872·1225 • College Station, IX 888-&10·221 B
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
LablD: C11 020544-01 0
Client Sample 10: MW-34
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus An & U MOC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
335
505
74
0.54
150
NO
0.3
13.3
394
2110
7.42
3690
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
NO
34
ND
ND
NO
136
ND
ND
ND
23.7
NO
ND
0.5
0.1
0.1
Units
mg/L
mg/l
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/l
mg/l
mg/L
mg/l
mg/L
mg/l
S.u.
mg/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pC ilL
pCi/L
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 08:30
DateRecelved: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D
D
D
A2320 B 02118111 19 :58 1 jba
A2320 B 02/18/11 19:581 jba
E200.7 02/25/11 13 :36 1 cp
A4500-CI B 02128/11 11 :03 Ilr
0.10 A4500-F C 02/18/11 16:041 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:36 1 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02125/11 12:241 dc
0.1 E353.2 02/23/1112:52/dc
0.5 E200.7 02125/11 13 :36 1 cp
E200.7 02/25/11 13 :36 1 cp
50 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 12:04/1r
0.01 A4500-H B 02/18/11 15:49 1 Ir
11 A2540 C 02/18/11 16:01 1 Imc
5.0 E200.8 02123/11 04:491 sml
0.50 E200.8 02123/11 04:49 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
25 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
30 E200.7 02125/11 13:361 cp
1.0 E200.8 02123/11 04:491 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 04:49 1 sml
20 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
5.0 E200.8 02123/11 04:491 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:49 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
100 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
15 E200.8 02/23/11 04:491 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:49 1 sml
E900.1 03/02/11 18:26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18:261 ep
E900.1 03/02111 18:261 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 15 of 44
EN:RGY
,', r ~ ... "")' ., ~, l..!/ ~ I r '.
www.energylab.com
AM/tfIrII~SIIIu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GiII&tte, WY 888-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11 020544-01 0
Client Sample 10: MW-34
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
3.22
51.6
55.0
3440
1.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
109
114
108
84.0
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers Rl
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 08:30
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 03/14/11 08:241 kbh
Calculation 03/14/11 08:241 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 08 :24 1 kbh
Calculation 03/14/11 08:241 kbh
Calculation 03/14/11 08:241 kbh
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02126/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02126/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02126/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02126/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :06 1 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 44
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
11D2272-004A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: MW-35
Collection Date: 2115/2011 1240h
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2118/2011 0930h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2119/2011 1513h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 109
460-00-4 80-123 104
1868-53-7 80-124 102
2037-26-5 80-125 98.9
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 7 of25
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is Located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent llse oftbe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contacL This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience~
EN:RGY
.'\!: ) r ~ , ,I t ',I "
www.energylab.com
AIIIIyIiuf f.sufIMM:I sm, lIS!
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735-4489 . Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 8&&·188·7175 • Rapid City, SO 888·612·1225 • CDilege StatiDn, 1X 888·690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab ID: C11020544-011
Client Sample ID: MW-35
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS· DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLlDES· DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
266
289
41
0.32
86.6
0.06
0.3
7.7
227
1140
7.19
2200
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
188
ND
248
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12.7
ND
ND
2.6
0.2
0.1
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
s.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/15/11 12:40
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
D·
A2320 B 02/18/11 20:061 jba
A2320 B 02/18/11 20:061 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :40 1 cp
1 A4500-CI B 02/28/11 11 :06 1 Ir
0.10 A4500-F C 02/18/11 16:101 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:40 1 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/25/11 12:261 dc
0.1 E353.2 02/23/11 12:541 dc
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:40 1 cp
0.6 E200.7 02/25/11 13:40 1 cp
50 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 12:05 1 Ir
0.01 A4500-H B 02/22/11 09:39 1 Ir
10 A2540 C 02/18/11 16:011 Imc
5.0 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:56 1 sml
25 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:56 1 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 04:561 sml
30 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :40 1 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:56 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:56 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:56 1 sml
20 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
5.0 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
100 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
15 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 04:561 sml
E900.1 03/02/11 18:26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18 :26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18 :26 1 ep
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Page 17 of 44
EI\ERGY
,\ •. H,,\.(lr., '.
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOO-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-D515
Gillalta, WY 888-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 881-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-011
Client Sample ID: MW-35
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
3.74
29.3
31.6
1940
1.13
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
107
112
106
B4.0
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
BO-120
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/15/11 12:40
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
Calculation 03/14/11 08 :25 1 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 08:25/ kbh
Calculation 03114/11 08:251 kbh
Calculation 03/14/11 08:251 kbh
Calculation 03/14/11 08:251 kbh
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :421 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 / ilr
SW8260B 02126/11 01 :421 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 / ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :421 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :42 1 ilr
SW8260B 02126/11 01 :42 1 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :421 ilr
SW8260B 02/26/11 01 :421 ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 18 of 44
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102272-006A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: MW-35R
Collection Date: 2114/2011 0820h WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
(80 I) 263-8686
Toll Free [phone]
Fax: [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/1812011 0930h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2119/2011 1551h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
-
Contact: 10 Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 110
460-00-4 80-123 103
1868-53-7 80-124 102
2037-26-5 80-125 99.3
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 9 of 25
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and ReRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on tbe attached cac. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reprodut:tion of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted ooly 00 contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for tbe due pcrfonnan!;e of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EI\ERGY
i\" l!-,."! ( I';!" "
www.energylab.com
WIytIaI ExuIIMIt:I SIrA 1m
Helena, tIT 877-412-0711 • Billings, tIT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GIIIBttB, WY 886-688-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-890-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 sl Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab ID: C 11020544-014
Client Sample ID: MW-35R
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
4
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
0.1
NO
NO
9.14
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
55
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
0.09
0.07
0.1
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
H -Analysis performed past recommended holding time.
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/14/11 08:20
DateRecelved: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
0
H
U
A2320 B 02118/11 20:221 jba
A2320 B 02/18111 20:221 jba
0.5 E200.7 02125/11 13:49 1 cp
A4500-CI B 02/28/11 11 :1511r
0.10 A4500-F C 02/18/11 16 :25 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :491 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/25/11 12:301 de
0.1 E353.2 02123/11 12:59 1 de
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:491 cp
0.6 E200.7 02/25/11 13:49 1 cp
A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 12:46 1 Ir
0.01 A4500-H B 02/22/11 09:50/1r
10 A2540 C 02/18/1116:02 lime
5.0 E200.8 02123/11 05:431 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 05:43 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 05:43 1 sml
25 E200.8 02/23/11 05:43 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:43 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:43 1 sml
30 E200.7 02/25/11 13:49/ cp
1.0 E200.8 02/23/11 05:431 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:431 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 05:431 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 05:431 sml
20 E200.8 02123/11 05:431 sml
5.0 E200.8 02123/11 05:43 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:43 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02123/11 05:43 / sml
100 E200.8 02123/11 05:43 1 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/23/11 05:43 1 sml
15 E200.8 02123/11 05:431 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:431 sml
E900.1 03/02/11 18:261 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18:261 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18:261 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 22 of 44
EN:RGY
/01 JH~\.I '--'HI'·J
www.energylab.com
AaI1fItM £luIIMa SIJu lISt
Helena, liT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 8OD-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 818-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • Collage Station, IX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Cll020544-014
Client Sample 10: MW-35R
Analyses Result
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5) -100
Anions 0.102
Cations ND
Units Qualifiers Rl
%
meq/L
meq/L
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/14/11 08:20
DateRecelved: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 03/14/11 OB :27 1 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 OB:27 1 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 OB:27 1 kbh
-The ion balance is not appropriate for samples having a conductivity less than 300 umhos/cm.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
107
108
107
B4.0
ug/L 20 SWB260B 02/26/11 02:53 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SWB260B 02126/11 02:53 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SWB260B 02126/11 02 :53 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SWB260B 02126/11 02:531 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SWB260B 02126/11 02:531 jlr
ug/L 20 SWB260B 02126/11 02:531 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02 :53 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:531 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:531 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:531 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:531 jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:531 jlr
%REC BO-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:531 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:531 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 23 of 44
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client: Denison Mines
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
I1D2272-005A
Client Sample ID: MW-60
Collection Date: 2/16/2011
Received Date: 2118/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2/1912011 1532h
Units: IlglL
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
l300h
0930h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 110
460-00-4 80-123 105
1868-53-7 80-124 102
2037-26-5 80-125 99.0
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 8 of25
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and ReM are performed in accordance to NELAC protQ[::ols~ Pertinent sampling information is tocated on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of tbe
addressee. Privileges ofsubsequcnt use of the name of tbis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, Of in connection
with the fe-publication of this report for any purpose othcr tha.n for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no rcsponsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
;., ,}j, ~-.I r. it" •
www.enefgylab.com
AM/ffk:II~ SIller 1m
Helena, MT877-47Z-0711 • Billings, MT 8011-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillalte, WY 8&&-186-7175 . Rapid CI1y, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&80-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab ID: C11020544-013
Client Sample ID: MW-60
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
5
ND
55
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.98
67
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.1
0.07
0.1
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 13:00
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
U
A2320 B 02/18/11 20:121 jba
A2320 B 02/18/11 20:121 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:441 cp
1 A4500-CIB 02/28/11 11 :08 Ilr
0.10 A4500-F C 02/18/11 16:21 1 jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :441 cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/25/11 12 :28 1 dc
0.1 E353.2 02/23/11 12:571 dc
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :441 cp
0.6 E200.7 02/25/11 13:441 cp
A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 12:11 IIr
0.01 A4500-H B 02/22/11 09 :48 Ilr
10 A2540 C 02/18/11 16:0211mc
5.0 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
25 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
30 E200.7 02/25/11 13 :44 1 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:09 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 05:09 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:091 sml
20 E200.8 02/23/11 05:09 1 sml
5.0 E200.8 02/23/11 05:09 1 sml
10 E200.8 02/23/11 05:09 1 sml
0.50 E200.8 02123/11 05:091 sml
100 E200.8 02123/11 05:091 sml
0.30 E200.8 02123/11 05:09 1 sml
15 E200.8 02/23/11 05:09 1 sml
10 E200.8 02123/11 05:091 sml
E900.1 03/02/11 18:26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18 :26 1 ep
E900.1 03/02/11 18 :26 1 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 20 of 44
EN:RGY
;,'_O,u\l(,I([ "
www.energytab.com
AIIIII!kM rruo-. SJB. 1m
Helena, MT 877-472~711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 881·188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • College Station, 1]( 888-690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Client Sample 10:
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-013
MW-60
Result
-100
1.67
NO
Units Qualifiers RL
%
meq/L
meq/L
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11 13:00
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
Calculation 03/14/11 08 :26 1 kbh
Calculation 03/14/11 08:261 kbh
Calculation 03114/11 08 :26 1 kbh
-The ion balance is not appropriate for samples having a conductivity less than 300 umhos/cm.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
110
115
107
84.0
ug/L 20 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02: 17 1 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
ug/L 20 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/1102:171 jlr
ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
%REC 70-130 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:171 jlr
%REC 80-120 SW8260B 02/26/11 02:17 I jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 21 of 44
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102168-003A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: MW-65
Collection Date: 2/8/2011 1215h WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/11/2011 0945h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2/1112011 1215h
Units: IlglL
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 101
460-00-4 80-123 108
1868-53-7 80-124 99.8
2037-26-5 80-125 102
Report Date: 2/17/2011 Page 6 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and ReRA arc pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnatioD is Located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use oflhe
addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of tbis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re·publication of this report fOT any purpose other thall for the addressee will be granted only on contact. Tbis company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience~
EN:RGY
;\' J'<"I' ,( •• '
www.energylab.com
AMIytJaI~ SIlIu 1m
Helena, liT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4488 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888·188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Lab 10: C11020352-003
Client Sample 10: MW-65
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Potassium
Sodium
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
pH
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOL VEO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
ND
567
430
59
3.15
847
0.11
2.4
20.9
255
4870
6.65
6630
ND
2.16
83.2
ND
267
ND
ND
ND
28100
0.75
708
128
13.6
ND
1.01
ND
41.7
ND
500
9.1
1.1
0.6
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
s.u.
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
pC ilL
pC ilL
pCi/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/08/11 12:15
DateReceived: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
Qualifiers RL QCl Method Analysis Date I By
D
D
D
D
D
A2320 B 02115111 16:371 jba
A2320 B 02115/11 16:37 1 jba
E200.7 02/25/11 13:08 1 cp
1 A4500-CI B 02/15/11 15:50 1 Ir
0.10 A4500-F C 02/11/11 14:22 I jba
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:08 I cp
0.05 A4500-NH3 G 02/14/11 12:381 dc
0.2 E353.2 02/15/11 13:101 dc
0.5 E200.7 02/25/11 13:08 1 cp
E200.7 02/25/11 13:08 1 cp
100 A4500-S04 E 02117/11 15:47/1r
0.01 A4500-H B 02/11 III 14:46 IImc
17 A2540 C 02/11/11 14:311 Imc
5.0 E200.B 02117/11 00:121 sml
0.50 E200.8 02115/11 20:251 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/15/11 20:251 sml
25 E200.8 02/15/11 20:25 I sml
10 E200.8 02/17/11 00:121 sml
10 E200.8 02/15/11 20:251 sml
30 E200.7 02/16/11 1B:26 1 cp
1.0 E200.8 02/17/11 00 :121 sml
10 E200.8 02/17/11 00:12 I sml
0.50 E200.8 02/17/11 00:12 I sml
10 E200.8 02115/11 20:25 I sml
20 E200.B 02117/11 00:12 I sml
5.0 E200.B 02l17/1100:12/sml
10 E200.8 02/17/11 00:121 sml
0.50 E200.8 02/15/11 20 :251 sml
100 E200.8 02/17/11 00 :121 sml
0.30 E200.8 02/17/11 00:121 sml
15 E200.8 02/17/11 00:121 sml
10 E200.8 02/17/11 00:121 sml
E900.1 02/17/11 18:041 ep
E900.1 02117/11 1 B:04 1 ep
E900.1 02/17/11 18:041 ep
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 7 of 31
EN:RGY
.,1,.>/ •• "1',,11\ •
www.energylab.com
AIu/rlJuI bu~ SIirc. IIJ2
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-8515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • Collage station, 1X 818-610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab ID:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020352-003
Client Sample ID: MW-65
Analyses
DATA QUALITY
AlC Balance (± 5)
Anions
Cations
Solids, Total Dissolved Calculated
TDS Balance (0.80 -1.20)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
-4.59
113
103
6780
0.980
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
103
107
96.0
104
Units
%
meq/L
meq/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/08/11 12:15
DateRecelved: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
Calculation 03/10/11 13:031 kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13 :03 I kbh
Calculation 03110/11 13:031 kbh
Catculation 03/10/11 13:031 kbh
Calculation 03/10/11 13:031 kbh
SW8260B 02/12/11 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03 :33 I jlr
SW8260B 02/12111 03:33 I jlr
SW8260B 02/12111 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12111 03 :33 I jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03 :331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03 :331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03:331 jlr
SW8260B 02/12/11 03 :33 1 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 31
EN:RGY
~', I ::)1,;, I C.I (I r '>
www.energylab.com
AM/JfJuJEtullloct st." 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-G711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&5-&88-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-&80-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-012
Client Sample ID: MW-70
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Thallium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
1610
3180
3.54
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/15/11 14:40
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D 50 A4500-S04 E 03/03/11 12:071 Ir
10 A2540 C 02/18/11 16:01 Ilmc
0.50 E200.8 02/23/11 05:021 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 19 of 44
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102080-005A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 2/1/2011
Received Date: 2/412011 1015h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 214/2011 1522h
Units: ~g/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GCIMS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 102
460-00-4 80-123 107
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 102
Report Date: 21712011 Page 8 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling infonnaLion is located on the attached cac. This report is provided for the exclusive use oftbe
addressee Privileges ofsubscqUCDt use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale ofaDY product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspcction andlor analysis in good faith
aDd according to the roles of the trade and of science.
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
110216S-004A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 2/7/2011 WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
S4115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/1112011 0945h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2/1112011 1234h
Units: IlglL
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-dS
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260CIS030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 102
460-00-4 80-123 109
IS6S-53-7 SO-124 101
2037-26-5 SO-125 103
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 7 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc per fanned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached cae This report is provided for the ex.clusivc use oflhc
addressee Privileges of subsequent usc ofthc name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or salc of any product or process, or in connection
with tbe re-pubLication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnance of inspection andlor analysis in good Faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102272-007A
AMERICAN Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 2/14/2011 WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Received Date: 2/1S/2011 0930h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 2119/2011 1610h
Units: ).lgIL
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-dS
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Metbod: SWS260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 111
460-00-4 SO-123 104
IS6S-53-7 SO-124 101
2037-26-5 SO-125 97.9
Report Date: 2/22/20 II Page \0 of 25
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, aod ReRA arc pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges ofsubsequeot use of the name of this company or any member of its stafT, or reproduction oftbis report in connection witb the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication oftbis report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofiospection and/or analysis in good faith
aDd according to the rules of the trade aDd of science.
EN:RGY
j. I J' (~\ I \.)1 ~ I '.
www.energylab.com
AM/tIfaI EJUIInI:t SIIIu /152
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800· 735·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 888·188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·812-1225 • Colluge Station, TX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater
C11020163-005
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank 5521
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
100
107
99.0
102
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifier RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/02/11
DateReceived: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
SW8260B 02/09/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15 :28 1 jl r
SW8260B 02/09/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02109/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02109/11 15:28/ jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15 :28 / jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15:281 jlr
SW8260B 02109/11 15 :28 / jlr
SW8260B 02/09/11 15 :28 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/09111 15 :28 1 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 28
EN:RGY
..... 11)1.,,1 Ill!'
www.energy\ab.com
AtIM!IIaI ~ SIIIa 1m
Halena, r.rr 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOO-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY B8S-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • Collage Station, IX 888-680-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020352-007
Client Sample 10: Trip Blank 5515
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
107
108
104
104
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/07/11
DateRecelved: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
SW8260B 02111/11 22:431 jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:43 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:431 jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:431 jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:431 jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:43 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:431 jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:43 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/11 III 22:43 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:43 I jlr
SW8260B 02/11/11 22:43 I jlr
SW8260B 02111/11 22:43 I jlr
SW8260B 02111 III 22:43 I jlr
SW8260B 02111/11 22:43 I jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 12 of 31
EN:RGY
I, ~ J II" ,\, I ~ I-•
www.energylab.com
AMI1fIuI buJlMJc. S/itc. IW
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project:
Lab 10:
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-015
Client Sample 10: Trip Blank 6092
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
113
105
112
B4.0
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
BO-120
70-130
BO-120
BO-120
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
SWB260B 02/26/11 03:291 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03:29 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03:291 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03 :29 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03:291 jlr
SWB260B 02126/11 03:29 1 jir
SW8260B 02126/11 03:291 jlr
SWB260B 02126/11 03 :291 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03:29 1 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03:291 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03:291 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03 :29 1 jlr
SW8260B 02/26/11 03 :291 jlr
SWB260B 02/26/11 03 :291 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 24 of 44
EN:RGY
..... '-.\)Iud l 10"1. '..J
www.energylab.com
AM/ytJc6I~smu 1m
Helena, lIfT 877-472-0711 _ Bllllnll, Iff 1110·730·4481 • Caapar, WY 818·236-151&
Gillette, W'( 866·188-7175 • RapId City, SD 888·172-1225 • CIIUe,. Stalton, IX 11H, .. ,218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater
C 11020163-006
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses Result Units
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
2.0
QualHler RL
Report Date: 03/10/11
Collection Date: 02/02/11
DateRecelved: 02/04/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E170.1 02104/11 10:00 1 kbh
MCl -Maximum conlaminanllevel.
NO -Not detected allhe reporting limit.
Page 12 of 28
Er\ERGY
:1' -J I. ,\, I I r ~ I .
Halena, MT877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 8OD-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatts, WY 888-18&-7175 · Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 . College Station, IX 888-&10-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020352-008
Client Sample 10: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.0
Qualifiers Rl
Report Date: 03/15/11
Collection Date: 02/10/11
DateReceived: 02/11/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date I By
E170.1 02/11/11 10:15/ kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 31
EN:RGY
."\. )f.:' J' I ~ 1 •
www.energylab.com
W/ytIaI~SbIu 1m HBlena, NT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gil/etta, WY 8&6-188-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 • Collage Stalion, IX 881-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
C11020544-016
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result Units
2.0
Qualifiers Rl
Report Date: 03/24/11
Collection Date: 02/16/11
DateReceived: 02/18/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E170.1 02118/11 09 :20 I kbh
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 25 of 44
A Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
AMERICAN Denver, CO 80265
WEST TEL: [phone]
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
RE: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1102080
American West Analytical Laboratories received 5 sample(s) on 2/4/2011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado and Idaho. Certification
document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this
report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "SUff" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitaion limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
Jose Rocha Thank You,
QA Officer F . Digitally signed by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL.
ou=AWAL, emall=kyle@awal-
labs.com, c=US
Kyle
Gross Date: 2011020714:01:59 '{]7'00'
Approved by:
Laboratory Director or designee
j
Report Date: 21712011 Page 1 0[21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. PertineDt sampling infonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges ofsubsequcnt usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale orany product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN Client:
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Project:
Lab SetID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1l02080-001A
1102080-002A
1102080-003A
1102080-004A
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102080
2/412011 1015h
Client Sample ID Date Collected
MW-ll 21212011 1250h
MW-25 212/2011 13lOh
MW-30 2/1/2011 1240h
MW-31 2/1/2011 1435h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
1102080-005A Trip Blank 2/1/2011 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
8260CI5030C
Report Date: 21712011 Page 2 0[21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached cac. Tbis report is provided fortbe exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name oftrus company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the fe-publication of this report for any purpose otber than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of scicncc~
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
January Monthly
1102080
Project:
Lab SetID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
2/4/2011
211 & 2/2/2011
Intact
None
SW-8468260CIS030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 21712011 Page 3 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling inronnatioD is Located on tbe attached COCo This repon is provided for the exclusive usc ortbe
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of Ibis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re.publication oftrus report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis iu good faith
and I:lccording to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1102080
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 020411A Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 020411A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 020411A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 020411A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 020411A SUIT: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]:om, web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
flg/L SW8260C 17.8 20.00 0 88.9 43-146
%REC SW8260C 48.8 50.00 97.5 69-132
%REC SW8260C 5004 50.00 101 85-118
%REC SW8260C 49.8 50.00 99.7 80-120
%REC SW8260C 50.1 50.00 100 81-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
2/4/2011 1309h
2/4/2011 1309h
2/4/2011 1309h
2/4/2011 1309h
2/4/2011 1309h
Report Date: 217/2011 Page 9 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Peninent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use oflhe addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advet'lisement, promotion or sale of any product or procC$s, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granled only on contact. This company acceplS no responsibiliL), except for the due performaIH:e of in spec Lion a.nd/or analysis in good
faith and according to the rules of !.he trade and ofscience.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1 102080
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 020411A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 020411A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 020411A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 020411A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 020411A Surr: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Units
IlgiL
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: awal@awal-Iabscom, web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MBLK
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount Original
Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
SW8260C < 1.00
SW8260C 50.0 50.00 100 69-132
SW8260C 53.3 50.00 107 85-118
SW8260C 49.9 50.00 99.8 80-120
SW8260C 51.2 50.00 102 81-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
2/4/2011 1347h
2/4/2011 1347h
2/4/2011 1347h
2/4/2011 1347h
2/4/2011 1347h
Report Date: 2nl2011 Page 10 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and ReRA are performed in accordance \0 NELAe protocols. Pertinenl sampling information is localed on the anached COCo Thili report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of i1s staff. or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advcrtiscmenl, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wilh the re-publication orlhis report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspeclion and/or analysis in good
faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1102080
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
1l020S0-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
11020S0-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
11020S0-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
11020S0-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
11020S0-001AMS SUIT: Toluene-dS
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iahs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlgiL SWS260C IS.5 20.00 0 92.7 43-146
%REC SWS260C 51.0 50.00 102 77-144
%REC SWS260C 50.3 50.00 101 SO-123
%REC SWS260C 50.S 50.00 102 SO-124
%REC SWS260C 50.0 50.00 99.9 80-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
2/4/2011 1600h
2/4/2011 1600h
2/4/2011 1600h
2/4/2011 1600h
2/4/2011 1600h
Report Date: 217/2011 Page 11 of21
All analyses applicable 10 the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinenl sampling infannation is located on the altached cac This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use oftbe name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advcJtisemenl, promotion or sale of any producL or process, or in connection with the re·publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wilt be granted only on contact. This company acceplS no responsibility except fOT lhe due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good
faith and according 10 the rules of the trade and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1102080
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
11020S0-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
11020S0-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
11 020S0-00 1 AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
11020S0-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofl uoromethane
11020S0-001AMSD Surr: To1uene-dS
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail],com, web: www.awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: 10 Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
).lg/L SWS260C IS.4 20.00 0 92.0 43-146
%REC SWS260C 51.0 50.00 102 77-144
%REC SWS260C 49.2 50.00 9S.3 SO-123
%REC SWS260C 50.9 50.00 102 SO-124
%REC SW8260C 49.7 50.00 99.4 SO-125
Kyle F_ Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual
0 25
Date Analyzed
2/4/2011 1619h
2/4/2011 1619h
2/4/2011 1619h
2/4/2011 1619h
2/4/2011 1619h
Report Date: 2n12011 Page 12 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SOW A, and RCRA are performed in accordance 10 NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is tocaLed on the anacned COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, orreproduclion
of this report in connection with che advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wilh the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for lbe addressee will be granted only on con1act This company accepts no responsibility except for we due performance of in spec lion and/or analysiS in sood
faith and according 10 the rules afthe trade and of science.
Data Path
Data f'ile
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\I\DATA\FEBII-C\04f'EBllA\
X77L0801.D
4 f'eb 2011 2 :06 pm
1102080-001)\.
SAMP 5 .0ML lOf'3
6 Sample Mu ltiplier : 1
Quant Time: Feb 04 14 :20;59 2011
Ouant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11 :22:43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
~undance TIC: X77L0801 YMata~ms
"00000
~
I 1500000
1400000
~ -
, i I
1300000
I j • q 1200000
I ~ -Ii ,
j ~
Ii
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
I •
J
.! I 0
~
,
~
600000
SOOOOO
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
mme-> 2.00 2.SO 3.00 3.SO 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.SO 7.00 7.SO 8.00
AFULLW_28 .M f'ri f'eb 04 15 :03 :53 2011
8.SO 9.00 9.SO 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
Data Path
Data file
A.cq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA.\fEBlI-C\04fEB1lA\
X78L0802.D
4 reb 2011 2 :25 pm
ll02080-002A
SAMP 5 .DML lOf3
7 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: feb 04 15:00 :54 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AfULLW_28 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update fri Jan 28 11 :22 :43 2011
Response via Ini tial Calibration
(OT Review ed)
Abundan " TIC: X78L0802.O\dala.ms
1600000
~ ! 1500000
i 0 1400000
~ ,
I I , , ~ • i • .i
~
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
• I • I ,! " ~ ,j
800000
500000
"'0000
300000
200000
100000
0
'Time·-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00
AFULLW-28 .M Fri Feb 04 15 :04 :27 2011
8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11 .00 11.50
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\FEBII-C\04FEB11A\
X79LOB03.D
4 Feb 2011 2 :4 4 pm
1102080-003A
SAMP 5 .0ML IOP3
B Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 04 15 :01 :30 2011
Quant Method C :\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Pri Jan 28 11 :22 :43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
r"~'"~ TIC' X79L0803.D\data.ms
1500000
1400000 ~
i
1300000 j
1 0 ~
1200000
1100000
1000000
" j I ~ , ~ ! I • • • Ii
900000
800000
700000
600000 " ,
500000 i ]
I ~ 400000 j ,j
JOOOOO
200000
100000
o
iTime··> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.~8.00 8.50 9.00
AFULLW_28 .M Fei Feb 04 15 :05 :01 2011
9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 II.d
Report Dale: 2nn1j""'''l'tlgCllS or21
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C ;\msdchem\1\DATA\FEBII-C\04F~BIIA\
X80L0804 .D
4 Feb 2011 3 ;03 pm
1102080-0041>.
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
9 Sample Multi plier ; 1
Quant Time ; Feb 04 15 ;41;41 2011
Quant Method C : \t~S1)CHEM\l \ME:THODS\AFULLW_28 . M
Quant Title VOA Calibra~ion
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11 :22 ;43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
j
iAbuncfimCB TIC: X80L0804.D\dala~
1500000
I
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
o
[Time->
A
AFULLW_28 .. M Fri Feb 04 15 :42 :27 2011
1 t en ! ~ 2
i ~ ...
I! ~ .II ~ '" I: 6l 5 en
ti
'" ~ ;-~ I ~
rIl. i i!! III :!l " f! ~ '" .....
~ 9 '" i '5 Iii E I! 1/ <II If' I:
~ ::> en
~ ~
Report Dale: 217J2ijJllgWagcBJ6 of21
Quantitation Report (QT Rev iewed 1
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
C:\msdehem\1\OATA\FEBII-C\04FEB11A\
X81L0805.D
4 Feb 2011 3 :22 pm
1102080-005A
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
10 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time : Feb 04 15:42 :11 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11 :22 :43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
\6.bvndance TIC: X81L0805.O\dall.ms
1500000 i
1400000 I 0
1300000 ;
1200000
1100000 ..
1000000 J
~
9()0000
""0000
700000
"",,00
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
o ' i
I
I i ." 0
I ~
~
a
Tlme--> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3,50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.f19 7.00 7.5Q..2.00 6.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_28 .M Fri Feb 04 15 :43 :01 2011
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Abuli(iance
2900000
2800000
2700000
2600000
2500000
2400000
2300000
2200000
2100000
2000000
1900000
1800000
1700000
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEBll-C\04FEBllA\
X74LCS20.D
4 Feb 2011 1:09 pm
LCS VOC 020411A
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 04 13:21:24 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
VOA Calibration
Fri Jan 28 11:22:43 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: X74LCS20.D\data.ms
'" «i ]
'" ~ ~ (j)
~
0. ..
E
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 04 15:06:49 2011
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\FEBII-C\04FEBIIA\
X76LMBLK.D
4 feb 2011 1 :47 pm
MB VOC 020411A
MBLK 5 .0ML
5 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 04 14 :21 :44 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFU LLW_28 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fei Jan 28 11 :22 :43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
Abundance
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
<00000
300000
200000
100000
I
@
(QT Rev iewed)
~
I 0
~ ~ I
• J t
I ,
~
I
J
Time->
o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_28 .M Fri Feb 04 15:07 :23 2011
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
I'.bundance
3000000
2900000
2800000
2700000
2600000
2500000
2400000
2300000
2200000
2100000
2000000
1900000
1800000
1700000
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
jrime->
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\04FEB11A\
XS3S0S01.D
4 Feb 2011 4:00 pm
11020S0-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
12 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 04 16:12:09 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_2S.M
VOA Calibration
Fri Jan 2S 11:22:43 2011
Initial Calibration
AFULLW_2S.M Fri Feb 04 16:12:57 2011
(Not Reviewed)
E
1:' i ~[ ~~ '~'_,"",,""'''\.Il
X 6
Report Date: 21712{i'j3)gEVllge'k20 of21
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
I
I
undance
2700000
2600000
2500000
2400000
2200000
2100000
2000000
1900000
1800000
1700000
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
~Ime->
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\04FEB11A\
X84D0801.D
4 Feb 2011 4:19 pm
1l02080-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 20F3
13 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 04 16:31:08 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
VOA Calibration
Fri Jan 28 11:22:43 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: X84D0801 .Dldata.ms
"'. ~ .. c: " .il 0 >-5 (/)
~ ~ 1l ~ u:
0 >-~
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 04 16:36:41 2011 Report Date: 21712Q'JlIgEp'lIge'l21 of21
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1102080
Client: Denison Mines Page 1 of 1
Client ID: DENI00 Contact: J 0 AlUl Tischler 2/4/2011
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011 QC Level: LEVEL III WOType: Project
Comments: No Hard Copies (UL). QC 3 & Summary. EDD-CSV. Report THF to 1 ~.: ~t?
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
11 020S0-00 lA MW-l1 2/2/2011 12:50:00 PM 2/4/2011 10:15:00 AM 2/1S/2011 Aqueous 8260-W 21 VOCFridge 3
1l020S0-002A MW-25 212/2011 1:10:00 PM 2/1S/2011 S260-W VOCFridge -11020S0-003A MW-30 2/1/2011 12:40:00 PM 2/1S/2011 S260-W VOCFridge
11020S0-004A MW-31 21112011 2:35:00 PM 2/18/2011 8260-W VOCFridge
11020S0-005A Trip Blank 2/112011 2/18/2011 S260-W VOCFridge
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Pro·ect
1 st Quarter Ground
Water 2011
Sample 10
MW-11
MW-25
MW-30
MW-31
Trip blank
Date
Collected
2/2/2011
212/2011
2/1/2011
211/2011
i-JI/-'bll
Samplers Name
Tanner Holiida
Time
Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
1250 THF
1310 THF
1240 THF
1435 THF
Please notify Ryan Palmer of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediatelyl Thank you.
Relinquished By:(Signature)
Relinquished By:(Signature)
DatefTime Received By:(Signature)
2/3/2011
1300
DatefTime
DatefTime
Lab Set ill: 11 D1J\<iD
San].ples Were: COC Tape Was: Container Type: /rNo.Rec.
arShipped By: l . 'V<::) P~t on Outer Package o A W AL Supplied Plastic /
D Hand Delivered es ONo ON/A o A W AL Supplied Clear Glass /
o Ambient Unbro~n on Outer package o A WAL Supplied Amber Glass /'
EVChilled lJ-Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Temperature ~-),~ °C Present on Sample
DYes ~ ON/A
o A WAL Supplied vo~::;t:::2X Vials o Amber 0 Clear 0 He :> ace 0 No Headspace
Rec. Broken/Leaking DYes rn-No ON/A o NOll A W AL SupWt€cl Container
Notes:
Properly Preserved
Notes:
Rec. Witllln Hold
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TP04
TPH
Procedure. 1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
.6)
7)
Unbroken on sa~e V ,/ DYes ONo N/A
UYes DNa ON/A Notes:
/
I}(yes ONo Discrepancies Between Labels and COC
Preservative All pHs OK
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2HN03
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2SO4
pH<2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH. ZnAC
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H3P04 -,,,/
pH <2 H2SO4 /"
pH <2 HCL //
/"
/'
//
V
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently aver wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample battle or lid
Notes:
/"
../' ~/
,//
~/
1/
/
".-
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC and notify client for further instructions
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may be adjusted at client request
_\6
./
/
L"
V
DYes ll1'fo
A Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
AMERICAN Denver, CO 80265
WEST TEL: [phone]
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
RE: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1102168
American West Analytical Laboratories received 4 sample(s) on 211112011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado and Idaho. Certification
document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this
report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitaion limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
Jose Rocha Thank You,
QA Officer Ky I e F. Digilally signed by Kyle F. Gross
DN: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL, email=kyle@awal-
G labs com, c=US ross DaI8:2011.02.1715:05:16-07"00·
Approved by: t....-__________ ~
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 2/17/2011 Page I of 21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located 00 the attacbed COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use oflhe
addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company OT any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with tbe advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact, This company accepts no responsibility ell(cept for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good raith
and according to the rules of tbe trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN Client:
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1102168-001A
l102168-002A
1102168-003A
l102168-004A
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102168
2/11/2011 0945h
Client Sample ID Date Collected
MW-14 21712011 1300h
MW-22 218/2011 1215h
MW-65 218/2011 1215h
Trip Blank 21712011
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 2 of 21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion ar sale of any product or process, Of in connection
with the fe-publication of this report for any purpose other than for Ihe addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to tbe nIles of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1 st Quarter Ground Water 20 11
1102168
2/11/2011
217 & 2/8/2011
Intact
None
SW-8468260C/S030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 3 of21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oftbis report in emmection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose olher than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1102168
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
(801) 263·8686, Toll Free (888) 263·8686, Fax (801) 263·8687
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
LCS
---
Amount Original
SampleID Analyte Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
LCS VOC 021111A Tetrahydrofuran flglL SW8260C 17.9 20.00 0 89.5 43-146
LCS VOC 021111A Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC SW8260C 5l.3 50.00 103 69-132
LCS VOC 021111A Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC SW8260C 50.1 50.00 100 85-118
LCS VOC 021111A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane %REC SW8260C 50.6 50.00 101 80-120
LCS VOC 021111A Surr: Toluene-d8 %REC SW8260C 50.2 50.00 100 81-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
2/1112011 0905h
2/1112011 0905h
211112011 0905h
2/11/2011 0905h
2/1112011 0905h
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 8 of 21
AU analyses applicable to the CWA., SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAe protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc: of the name of this company or any member of its staff. or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good
faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 11 02168
Project: 1 st Quarter Ground Water 2011
SampleID Analyte
MB VOC 021111A Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 021111A SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MBVOC021111A SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 0211l1A SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 021111A SUIT: Toluene-dS
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
(80 I) 263·8686, Toll Free (888) 263·8686, Fax (80 I) 263·8687
e-mail: [e-mail]:www~awal-Iabs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Dept: MSVOA
QC Type: MBLK
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
IlglL SWS260C <1.00
%REC SWS260C 50.S 50.00 102 69-132
%REC SWS260C 53.7 50.00 107 S5-11S
%REC SWS260C 49.9 50.00 99.9 SO-120
%REC SWS260C 51.S 50.00 104 SI-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
2/11/2011 OS46h
2/1112011 OS46h
2/11120 II OS46h
2/11/2011 OS46h
2111/2011 OS46h
Report Date: 2/17/2011 Page 9 of21
All analyses Dpplicable La tbe CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accor&nce to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached cac .. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee~ Privileges of subsequent use oftbe name afmis company or any member of iLs staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connecLion with llle re-publication of this report for any purpose Olher than for the addressee will be gnmted only on contacL This company accepts no responsibility excepl for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good
faith and according to me rules of the trade: and of science,
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1102168
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Sample ID Analyte
110216S-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
110216S-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
11 0216S-00 1 AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
110216S-001AMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
11 0216S-00 lAMS SUIT: Toluene-dS
1102172-00IAMS Tetrahydrofuran
1102172-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1102172-001AMS SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1102172-00IAMS SUIT: Dibromofluoromethane
11 02172-00 I AMS SUIT: Toluene-dS
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: awaJ@awal-labs,com, web: www,awal-Iabs com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QCType: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
Ilg/L SWS260C 21.6 20.00 0 lOS 43-146
%REC SWS260C 51.0 50.00 102 77-144
%REC SWS260C 50.0 50.00 100 SO-123
%REC SWS260C 50.9 50.00 102 SO-124
%REC SWS260C 49.9 50.00 99.S SO-125
Ilg/L SWS260C 37.3 20.00 12.33 125 43-146
%REC SWS260C 4S.1 50.00 96.2 77-144
%REC SWS260C 50.3 50.00 101 SO-123
%REC SWS260C 49.6 50.00 99.1 SO-124
%REC SWS260C 50.S 50.00 102 SO-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
2/1112011 1253h
211112011 1253h
211112011 1253h
2111/2011 1253h
211112011 1253h
2/1112011 1447h
2/11/2011 1447h
2/1112011 1447h
2/11/2011 1447h
2/1112011 1447h
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 10 of 21
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A, and ReRA are performed in accordance 10 NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonmnion is located on the attached cac, This report is provided for the exclusive use of tbe addressc=:e. Privileges of subsequent use oflhe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on conl.act This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andiOT analysis in good
faith and according 10 the rules of1he lIade and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set 10: 1102168
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
SampleID Analyte
110216S-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
110216S-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
110216S-001AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
110216S-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
110216S-001AMSD Surr: Toluene-dS
1l02172-001AMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1102172-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
l102172-001AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1102172-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1102172-001AMSD Surr: Toluene-dS
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Units
J.1glL
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
J.1g/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-Iabs_com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Amount Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MSD
Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
SWS260C 21.6 20.00 0 lOS 43-146
SWS260C 51.3 50.00 103 77-144
SWS260C 51.1 50.00 102 SO-123
SWS260C 50_6 50.00 101 SO-124
SWS260C 50.5 50.00 101 SO-125
SWS260C 37.4 20.00 12.33 125 43-146
SWS260C 49.2 50.00 9S.4 77-144
SWS260C 50.7 50.00 101 SO-123
SWS260C 50.3 50.00 101 SO-124
SWS260C 50.5 50.00 101 SO-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual
0.27S 25
0.294 25
Date Analyzed
211112011 1312h
211112011 1312h
2/11/2011 1312h
2/1112011 1312h
2/11/2011 1312h
2/11/2011 1506h
2/1112011 1506h
2/11/2011 1506h
2/1112011 1506h
211112011 1506h
Report Date: 2117/20 II Page II of 21
All analyses applicable La the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance lO NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is locaLed on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee~ Privileges of subsequent use of the name afmis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
oftbis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contacL This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good
faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
Data Path
Data file
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\l\DATA\fEBII-C\llfEBIIA\
ZlOL1681 .D
11 feb 2011 11 :37 am
1102168-001A
SAMP 5.0ML lOf3
12 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time : feb 11 13 :39 :27 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28 .M
Quant Ti tle VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11 :22 :43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(OT Reviewed)
Abundance
1600000
TIC: ZI OLl6S1 D\dala.ms
1500000
1400000
1200000
1100000 J
"00000
900000
'00000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
TIme-->
Ol~~~~~~-T~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_28 .M Fri Feb 11 14 :13 :40 2011 Page : 4
ReponDale; 211712011 Page 12of21
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\11FEBI1A\
ZllLl682 . D
11 Feb 2011 11:56 am
l102168-002A
SAMP 5 .0ML 10F3
13 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time : Feb 11 13 : 40 : 12 2011
Qua,nt Method C: \MSDCHEM\l \METHODS\AFULL'C28 . M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Upd ate Fri Jan 28 11 :22 :43 2011
Response via Initial Calib ration
(QT Revie,~ed)
Abundance TIC: Z11L1682.D\data.rns
160000 0
iii
1500000 i ~ :l! 0
~ 1400000
.j i 130.0000
"!. ~
.0 e g t ~ ~ 'i'
" ". .b Ii 0 1 >-if !!l
0 e ~ m
~
1200000
1100000
1000000 <II
900000
800000
700000
<II ! <II
~ !! e ~ ~ g
~ j ~ Gl
Cl ~ t= Jl § <II
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
o A ~ l\. I I I I I I I I
Tim!!-> 2.0Q 2.50 ~:OO ~.?"Q 4:90 4~50 5,00 ~.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8,00 8.59 9.00 9.5,0 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFUL LW_ZS.M Fri Feb 11 14 :14 :01 2011 Paqe : 4
Repon Date: 211712011 Page 13 of21
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C : \msdchem\l \ DAtA \FEB11-C\llFEB1l1l. \
Z12L1683.D
11 reb 2011 12:15 pro
1102168-003A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
1f Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 11 13 :40 :50 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHE:M\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11 :22:43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QI Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: Z12L 16S3.D\dala.rns
1600000
1500000
1400000
1 1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
i '" ~ 1 0 ~ ~
~ .2
0 :fi ~ 0
0 1 ~ 1:: VI " VI
u;-
l I e ~ 0 ~ -. 1
1 i :fi ~~ 2 c ~ I-!!!
1 ~ <D j 5 VI
0 " Ii:
~
l
A A It A-
I J I I I o
2.00 2,50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7,00 7.50 8.QQ 8.50 \J~05> 9.50_1.1.l.QQ lQ.~O 11.00 11 :5j Tlme->
A:FULLW_2S.M Fri Feb 11 14:J.4:15 2011 Page : 4 ReponOatc: 211712011 Page 14of21
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\11FEB11A\
Z13L1684. D
11 Feb 2011 12:34 pm
11 0216 8-0 0 4A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
15 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 11 13:41:25 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11:22:43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: Z13L 1684.Dldata.ms
1500000
1450000
1400000
1350000
1300000
12.50000
1200000
1150000
1100000
1050000
1000000
950000
900000
850000
800000
750000
700000
650000
600000 en iii en 550000 fa ~ ~ '" 500000 E ~ E c E
450000 ~ ~ is ~ N_
400000 is
!i !i en CIl
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
Time->
o .l V.
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.~0 8.00 8.50 9.00 910 10.00 10:50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 11 14:14:26 2011 Page: 4 Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 15 of 21
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\FEBII-C\IIFEBIIA\
Z02LCS20.D
11 Feb 2011 9:05 am
LCS VOC 021111A
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 11 09:17:33 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\I\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11:22:43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
.Abundance TIC: Z02LCS20.Dldata.ms
2200000
2100000
2000000
1700000
I 1600000
1500000
!
E
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 11 13:10:39 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 2117/20 II Page 16 of 21
Data Path
Data file
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantita tion Report
C :\msdehem\l\DATA\FEBll-e\llF'EBllA\
ZOlLMBLK.D
11 Feb 2011 8:46 am
MB voe 021111A
MBLK S.OM!.
5 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time : Feb 11 13 :09 :31 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AF'ULLW_28 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11 :22 :43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC·lOILMBLK.D'ldata.ms
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000 I I
1000000
900000
800000
700000
500000 I
1
200000
100000
o 1
iTlme-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 1.00 1.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_2B .M Fri Feb 11 13 :09 :37 2011 Page: 4 Repon Dale: 2/1712011 Page 17 of21
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\I\DATA\FEBII-C\IIFEBIIA\
Z14S1681. D
11 Feb 2011 12:53 pm
1l02168-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
16 Sample Multiplier : 1
Quant Time: Feb 11 13:05:18 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\I\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11:22:43 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
Abundance
2400000
TIC: Z14S1681.D\data.ms
2300000
2200000
2100000
2000000
1900000
18000'00
1700000
"' t
1500000 1 1400000
E
q
" I
0 a: I ~ ! " oOi> em ~I ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ W 0 '0 .!l
~ime--> 2.
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 11 14:14:41 2011
" ~ " I g
I i f ~ t ~ ~:;:
'lI.-.. z
j
Page: 4
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 18 of 21
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\11FEB11A\
Z20S1671. D
11 Feb 2011 2 :47 pm
1102 1 72 -001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
22 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time : Feb 11 14 :59:30 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Fri Jan 28 11:22 :43 2011
Response via I nitial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: Z20S1671 .D\data.ms
Time->
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 11 17:37:25 2011
III
I. "" " "''' " ~ ~ ~ Ill")
II .,1 '" .. ."
11 .50
Page: 4
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 19 of 21
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
rrlf!1e-->
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\FEBll-C\llFEBllA\
Z15D1681.D
11 Feb 2011 1:12 pm
1l02168-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3
17 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 11 13:24:11 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
VOA Calibration
Fri Jan 28 11:22:43 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: Z15D1681 .D\data.ms
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 11 14:14:56 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 2117/20 II Page 20 of 21
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEBII-C\11FEBIIA\
Z21D1671.D
11 Feb 2011 3:06 pm
1l02172-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3
23 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 11 15:18:36 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_28.M
VOA Calibration
Fri Jan 28 11:22:43 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
\l\bundance TIC: Z21D1671.Dldata.ms
'" i I
E
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
200000
100000
;rime--> 2.00
AFULLW_28.M Fri Feb 11 17:38:01 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 2117/2011 Page 21 of 21
American West Analytical Laboratories
"VORK ORDER Summary Work Order: 1102168
Client: Denison Mines Page 1 of I
Client ID: DEN I 00 Contact: 10 Ann Tischler 2111/20 J 1
Project: I st Quarter Ground Water 20 I I QC Level: LEVEL n I WOType: Project
Comments: No Hard Copies (UL). QC 3 & Summary. EDD-CSV. Report THF to I j.l~~~1¥f~ 1)fQ
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date DUe Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
1 1021 68·00lA MW·14 2n12011 J :00:00 PM 211112011 9:45:00 AM 2/251201 1 Aqueous 8260·W ~ VOCFridge :3
II02168-002A MW-22 21812011 12:15:00 PM 2125/2011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
Ll02168-003A MW-65 2/25/201 1 8260-\\1 VOCFridge
IlO2168-004A Trip Blank 211/201 I 2/25/2011 8260·W VOCFridge
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
P . t rOJec S amplers N ame S amplers S· Ignature
1 st Quarter Ground ;JAAA\OCMJU-Water 2011 Tanner Holliday -V
Date Time
Sample 10 Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW-14 2/7/2011 1300 THF
MW-22 2/8/2011 1215 THF
MW-65 2/8/2011 1215 THF
THF
Trip blank tJ.1"'~1I
/
V
Please notify Ryan Palmer of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately! Thank you .
Relinquished By:(Signature)
.]~ A~<r'JL ___ ""'-
DatelTime Received By:(Signature)
2/10/2011
1300
DatelTime
Dafeqime '2/11 11
~ S
Lab Set ID: \ \ D 2-\ I..a c:[
Sam.,ples Were: COC Tape Was: Container Type:
~hipjJed By: lL-Y'~ P~t on Outer Package D A W AL Supplied Plastic
o Hand Delivered es DNa ON/A o A WAL Supplied Clear Glass
o Ambient un~n on Outer package o A WAL Supplied Amber Glass /'
u;rChilIed es DNa ON/A
Temperature ).l1 DC presen~ample
o A WAL Supplied VOA/TOC/T~
o Amber 0 Clear 0 Headspace 0 Headspace
Rec. BrokenlLeaking DYes llYN a ON/A DYes a ON/A o Non A WAL Supplied Co~er
Notes: Unbroken on sa= / / DYes DNa fA
Properly Preserved IifYes DNo ON/A Notes:
Notes:
Rec. Within Hold [}(Yes ONo Discrepancies Between Labels and CDC
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TP04
TPH
Procedure:
Notes:
/
Preservative All pHs OK /
pH <2 H2SO4 /,/
pH <2 H2SO4 L'"
PH >12 NaOH ./'
pH <2HNO. /
pH <2 H2SO4 /
.pH <2 H2SO4 V
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
. 6)
7)
pH<2 HCL /
pH <2 H2SO4 V
pH > 9NaOH, ZnAC /'
pH <2 H2SO4 V
pH <2 H3P04 /'
pH <2 H2SO4 /'
pH <2HCL /' ,
Pour a small amount of sample in Ihe sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC and notify client for further instructions
Place client conversation on COC
Samples may ~e adjusted at client request
~
-
No . Rey.~ . I'
/'
",/
/
DYes ~o
---
A Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
AMERICAN Denver, CO 80265
WEST TEL: [phone]
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
RE: 1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1102272
American West Analytical Laboratories received 7 sample(s) on 211812011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado and Idaho. Certification
document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this
report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitaion limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
Jose Rocha Thank You,
QA Officer F . Digitally signad by Kyle F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL, emBil=kyle@awal-
labs com, c=US
Kyle
Gross Date: 2011.02 2414:33:55 -OTOO'
Approved by:
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page I of25
AU analyses applkablc to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached cac. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with. tbe re-publication of this report for any purpose othertban for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofsciencc.
A
AMERICAN Client:
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Project:
Lab Set 10:
Date Received:
Lab Sample 10
1102272-001A
1102272-002A
l102272-003A
1102272-004A
l102272-005A
1102272-006A
l102272-007A
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Denison Mines
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102272
2/18/2011 0930h
Client Sample 10 Date Collected
MW-20 2116/2011 1045h
MW-26 211612011 1226h
MW-34 2/16/2011 0830h
MW-35 2115/2011 1240h
MW-60 2116/2011 1300h
MW-35R 2/14/2011 0820h
Trip Blank 2/14/2011
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Matrix Analysis
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260CI5030C
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 2 of 25
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA Ilrc perronned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COe. This report is provided for the exclusive use oftbe
addressee Privilcgcs of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oftbis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the fe-publication oftbis report for any pl.lrflose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. Tbis company accepts DO responsibility ex.cept for the due perfonnaoce of inspection andlor analysis in good raith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience~
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1st Quarter Ground Water 2011
1102272
2/18/2011
2114,2/15,2/16/2011
Intact
None
SW-8468260C/5030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 3 of 25
All analyses applicable to tbe CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on tbe attached cac. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of trus company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection wjth the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with tbe re-publication oftbis report for any purpose other than fortbe addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according 10 the rules of the trade and of science.
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set lD: 1102272
Project: 1st Quarter Ground Water 20 11
Sample 10 Analyte Units
LCS voe 02 1911A Tetrahydrofuran ).lg/L
LCS VOC 02191 1A Surr: 1.2-0ichloroelhane-d4 %REC
LCS VCC 02 1911 A Surr: 4-BTomofiuorobenzene %REC
LCS VCC 0219 11A SUIT: Dibromonuoromethane %REC
LCS VcC 02 1911 A SurT: Toluene-d8 %REC
QC SUlVIMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260e 11.9 20.00
SW8260e 53.1 50.00
SW8260C 49.3 50.00
SW8260C 51.2 50.00
SW8260C 49.4 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
LCS
Amount %REC Limits
0 64.4 43-146
106 69-1 32
98.7 85-118
102 80-1 20
98.9 81-120
RPD
%RPI) Limit Qual Date Analyzed
211912011 1241b
2/1912011 1241h
2/19/2011 1241 h
2/1912011 1241h
2/1912011 1241h
Report Dale: 2J22j20 I I Page II of25
Client: Deniso n Mi nes
Lab Set 10: (102272
Project: 1 st Quarter Ground Water 20 II
Sample ID Analyte Units
MB VOC02191 1A Telrahydrofuran )lg/L
MB VOC 021911A Surr: 1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC
MB VOC 021911A Surr: 4-BromO'f1uorobenzenc %REC
MB VOC 02191 1A Surr. Dibromotluoromethune %REC
MB voe 021911 A Surr: To luene-d8 %REC
C SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260C < 1.00
SW8260C 52.8 50.00
SW8260C 51.7 50.00
SW8260e 49.6 50.00
SW8260e 49.4 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QC Type:
Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MBLK
Amount %REC Limits
106 69-1 32
103 85-118
99.3 80-(20
98.8 81 -120
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analy.zed
2/1912011 131911
2/19/2011 131911
2119120 II 13 19h
2119120 11 1319h
2119/20 11 131911
Report Dale: 212212011 Page 12 of25
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set In: 1102272
Project: 1 st Quarter Ground Water 20 1 J
Sample 10 Analyre Units
1 1 02272-00JAMS Tetrahydrofuran J.lgfL
1 1 02272-00JAMS Surr: 1.2-Dichloroclhane-d4 %REC
1102272-00 IAM S Surr: 4-Bromol111orobenzene %REC
II02272-001AMS Surr: Dibromonuoromcthane %REC
I 1 02272·001 AMS Surr: Toluene-dB %REC
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result Spiked
SW8260C 13.5 20.00
SW8260C 55.0 50.00
SW8260C 48.8 50.00
SW8260C 52.0 50.00
SW8260C 48.2 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
O"iginal
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MS
Amount O/OREC Limits
0 67.6 43-146
110 77-1 44
97.5 80-123
104 80-124
96.5 80·125
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
21191201 1 143511
21191201 1 1435h
21 L9/20 11 L435h
21 1912011 1435h
2/19120 11 1435h
Repon Date. 21'..21201 1 Page 1) of25
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set 10: 11 02272
Project: 1 st Quarter Ground Water 20 II
Sample 10 Analytc Units
1102272-001 A1\1SD Tetrahydrofuran IlglL
1102272-00IAMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 %REC
1 1 02272-00 IAMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene %REC
[ 102272-00IAMSD Sun: Dibromonooromel'hanc %REC
11 02272-00IAMSD Sun: Toluene-d8 %REC
C SUMMARY REPORT
Amount
Method Result. Spiked
SW8260C 12.8 20.00
SWS260C 54.4 50.00
SW8260C 48.S 50.00
SW8260C 51.6 50.00
SW8260C 48.4 50.00
Contact:
Dept:
QCType:
Original
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MSD
Amount %REC Limits
0 64.0 43-146
109 77-144
97.5 80-123
[03 80-124
96.8 SO-125
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
5.47 25 2119/201 1 1454h
2/191201 1 145411
2119/201 1 1454h
2119/2011 [454h
2/1912011 1454h
Report Date: V22I201 1 Page 14 of25
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vi<J,l
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\FEBII-C\19FEBlIA\
A74L272l.D
19 Feb 2011 1 :38 pm
ll02272-001A
SAMP 5 .0ML lO~3
6 Sample Multiplier : 1
QU<J,nt Time: Feb 19 15 :19 :09 2011
Quant Method C :\MSDCHEM\I\METHODS\A~ULLW_29 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Feb 16 13 :58 :28 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Rev iewed)
r. bundal'lC9
1900000
TIC: A74l2721.0\dala.ms
180000 0
0
J 0 I " ~ • I 0
t 0 !l , •
170000
160000
150000
140000 , • 1300000
120000 0 I
0 0 " • 110000
1000000
900000
800000
• ,
i 0 I 0 ! ,
700000
60000
saooo a a
40000 0
30000 0
20000 0
10000 0
0
ime--> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 '.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00
AFULLW_29 .M Sat ~eb 19 15:24 :17 2011
'.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 1 0~1 1.00 11 2Q..
Page : 4
Report Dale: 2/2212011 Page 15 of25
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sampl e
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\FEBI1-C\19FEBIlA\
A75L2722 .D
19 Feb 2011 1 :57 pm
1l02272-002A
SAMP 5 .0ML 10r3
7 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 19 15 :19 :48 2011
Quant M.ethod C: \MSDCHEM\l \METHODS\AFULLW_29 . M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Feb 16 13:58 :28 20~l
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
bundanc -----riC: AiS"L2722.DlJJa ta.ms e
1.3e,.07
1.259+07
1.2e .. 07
1.15e+07
1.le+07
1.05e,.07
1e,.07
9600000
9000000
8500000
8000000
7500000
7000000
6500000
6000000
5500000
5000000
4500000
iii I ~ Ul ::!
1 ~, ~ .§
1 .8 j ~
<I.!. e '." J .i! ~ e 0 ~ ~ 1~ ~ u ~ ~ to I=' g 0 ~ !!/. ... g ,,~ e !!I
~~ ID
f i ~
~ .liI '" e q :e "l 1Il 0
~ 1; ~ '" '"
4000000
3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
1500000
1000000
f
500000
o h .~ ~
ime-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00. 7.50 8..09
i\FOLLW_29 .M Sat Peb 19 15 :24 :52 2011
MQ 9.mL ~ 9':?.Q.-!~1.Q·?Q 11~0Q. 11~5Q
Page: 4 Repon Date: 2n2l2011 Page 16 of25
Data Path
Data File
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C;\msdehem\1\DATA\FEBll-C\19FEBllA\
A76L2723.0
19 Feb 2011 2:16 pm
1102272-003A
SAM? 5 .0ML lOF3
8 Sample Multiplie.r : 1
Quant Time: Feb 19 15 :20 :23 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHOOS\AFULLW_29 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Feb 16 13:58:28 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
rA.:"undanc • TIC; A 76L2723.0'dala.ms
170000 0
1600000 ,
f • I 0
1500000
130000 0 1
,j
1200000 I
~
100000 0
90000 0
80000 0
70000 0
•
0 t I J 0
,j ,
•
60000
500000
40000 0
300000
200000
100000
0 A
[flme··,. 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 '.50 5.00 5.50 '.00 '.50 7.00 Z·~OO
AFULLW_29 .M Sat Feb 19 15 :25 :27 2011
-
~50_ 9.00 9~50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
Page: 4 Report Date: mmOll Page 17 of2S
Da t a Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\FEBlI-C\19FEBllA\
1\79L2724.0
19 Feb 2011 3:13 pm
1102272-004A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
11 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 19 15:41:28 2011
Quant Method C:\MSOCHEM\1\METHOOS\AFULLW_29.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast update Wed Feb 16 13:58 :28 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
Abundance TIC: A79L2724.D\dala.ms
0
0 I , 150000
"0000 0
•
0 I
J
0 , • ; •
0 e
'30000
120000
110000
•
0
90000 0
8{)0000
70000 0
0 I • I j
0 ,
60000
500000
j -
0 l 40000
300000
200000
>0000 0
A I 0
[rime·-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 '.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 850
AFULLW_29.M Sat Feb 19 16:00:47 2011
9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.5Q.
Page : 4
Repon Ollie: 2I22nOll Page 18 of25
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\19FEB11A\
ABOL2725.D
19 Feb 2011 3:32 pm
1l02272-005A
SAMP 5.0ML lOF3
12 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 19 16:00:24 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_29.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Feb 16 13:58:28 2011
Initial Calibration
--
(QT Reviewed)
1Abundanc e TIC: ABOL2725.Dldata.ms
I
1700000 on " !!
1600000 i!l 5i .c e ~ u
0 1 ... !!l CJ)
~ ~ " t! 11
I " e .c t e g
~ e g III
1500000
1400000
1300000
~ CJ)
1200000
~ ~ CI> .c ~ 1100000
u::
0 ... I 1000000 !!l
BOOOOO
700000
en ~ i en ! ~ CI> e ~ ~ e 0 ,Q ~ 0
600000
500000
~ ~ en en 400000
300000
200000
100000
A
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.5L§Jl0 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 B.OO I mme->
o
AFULLW_29.M Sat Feb 19 16:01:20 2011
A
B.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10·~L 11.Q9......!.!:..~
Page: 4
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 19 of 25
Data Path
Data File
.... cq On
Operat or
Sample
Mise
.... LS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\O .... TA\FEBII-C\19rEB11 .... \
A.81L2726.0
19 Feb 2011 3 :51 pm
1102272-006 ....
SAMP 5 .0ML lor3
13 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Feb 19 16:04 :13 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW-2 9 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Feb 16 13 :58 :28 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
r. urrdan " TIC: A81l2726.0\dalQ,ms
170000 0
0 I 0 I ~ I ~
160000
150000
1400000
130000 0 j
l
120000 0 ,
j
110000 0 ~
~
'00000 0
90000 0
80000 0
70000 0
0 ! • I i 3
0 t ! ~ 0 , • ,
60000
50000
40000 0 •
30000 0
'0000 0
10000 0
• , I
0
iTime-> '0<> 2,50 3.00 3.50 400 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50
AFULLW_29 .M Sat reb 19 16 :04:31 2011
9.00_9.~ 10.00 10,SO 11.00 11.~
Page: 1\ Rcpon Dale: 212212011 Page 20 ofH
Data Path
Data File
A.cq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\FEBII-C\19FEBI1A\
AS2L2727 .D
19 Feb 2011 4 :10 pm
1l02272-007A
SAMP 5 .0ML lOF3
14 Sample Mult iplier : 1
Quant Time : Feb 19 16 :31:24 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\I\METHODS\AFULLW_29 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Wed Feb 16 13:58 :28 2011
Response via Ini t ial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
'"Siiidance TIC: A82L2727.Dldala.ms-----
1600000
0 I 0 t
•
0 I
150000
140000
130000
i
120000 0 Ai • ,
! •
0 t ~ 110000
0 I;
100000 0
90000 0
80000 0
70000 0
• 0 t • !
60000
i i ,! 0
:'<
0 .! , •
500000
"000
30000 0
20000 0
10000 0
II 0
ime-> 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 '.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50
AFULLW_29 .M Sat Feb 19 16 :31 :39 2011
9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 1 1.00_11~
Page: <I
Report Date: 212212011 Page 21 of2S
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
r. undance
3200000
2400000
2200000
2000000
1800000
1600000
1400000
1200000
1000000
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\19FEB11A\
A 71LCS20. D
19 Feb 2011 12:41 pm
LCS VOC 021911A
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 19 12:53:48 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_29.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Feb 16 13:58:28 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: A71 LCS20.D\data.ms
E
I
I" " " " N " t~
It II.
AFULLW_29.M Sat Feb 19 15:21:48 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 22 of 25
Quantitation Report
Data Path
Data file
Acq On
Op erator
Sampl e
Mise
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\19FEB11A\
A73LMBLK.D
19 Feb 2011 1:19 pm
MB VOC 021911A
MBLK 5.0ML
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
5 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 19 15:18:42 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_29.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Feb 16 13:58:28 2011
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
e rbundanc
1800000
--TIC: A73LMBLK.D\data.ms
1700000
~ 1 " ~
"' ...
'" ~
1600000
.r. en 1500000 ,; " III " " .D E! Q 1400000
~ ,; !! " III is 1i iii en .D
1300000
E! Q " Ii: 1200000 c t-!!1
1100000
1000000
SOOOOO
800000
700000 en ,; ~ en ~ E ..
E .t:: 0; ~ E! .ll ~ ~ E! c ,Q N. c
600000
500000
1i 5 en en
400000
300000
200000
100000
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50_6.00 6.50 7.00~0 8.00
AFULLW_29.M Sat Feb 19 15:22:22 2011
-
I
8.50 9:00 S.50 1 ().OQ ! Q,59-.J.1.,0.0 11 ~~
Page: 4
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 23 of 25
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEBll-C\19FEBllA\
A77S2721.D
19 Feb 2011 2:35 pm
1l02272-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
9 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 19 14:47:41 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_29.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Feb 16 13:58:28 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: A77S2721.D\data.ms
'" '" v ~ II!
~ !! Ii
" .i CJ) t ~ ~
"II
iii ~ ~ E if
Cl f-!!l
~I ...
ime-->
AFULLW_29.M Sat Feb 19 15:22:56 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 24 of 25
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\FEB11-C\19FEB11A\
A78D2721.D
19 Feb 2011 2:54 pm
1l02272-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3
10 Sample Multiplier: 1
Feb 19 15:06:44 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_29.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Feb 16 13:58:28 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: A7BD2721.D\data.ms
E
AFULLW_29.M Sat Feb 19 15:23:31 2011 Page: 4
Report Date: 2/22/2011 Page 25 of 25
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client:
Client ID:
Denison Mines
DENIOO Contact: .To Am Tischler
Work Order: 1102272
Page 1 of 1
2/18/2011
Project: 1st Quatter Ground Water 2011 QC Level: LEVEL III WO Type: Project
Comments: No Hard Copies (UL). QC 3 & Summaty EDD-CSV. RepOit THFto 1 J.1o .;
________________________ ~~~~~----------------------~B
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
I I 02272-00 IA MW-20 2/1612011 10:45:00 AM 2/18/20119:30:00 AM 3/4/2011 Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridge 3
1102272-002A MW-26 2116/2011 12:26:00 PM 3/4/2011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
1102272-003A MW-34 2/16/2011 8:30:00 AM 3/4/2011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
1102272-004A MW-35 2/15/2011 12:40:00 PM 3/412011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
1102272-005A MW-60 2/16/2011 1:00:00 PM 3/412011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
1l02272-006A MW-35R 2114/2011 8:20:00 AM 3/4/2011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
1l02272-007A Trip Blank 2/1412011 3/4/2011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge _____ 0
~ I Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
p . t rOJec S amplers N ame S amf:llers S· Ignature
1 st Quarter Ground ~~~ Water 2011 Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Sample 10 Col/ected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW20 2/16/2011 1045 THF
MW26 2116/2011 1226 THF
MW34 2/16/2011 830 THF
MWB5 2/15/2011 1240 THF
MWBO 2/16/2011 1300 THF
MW35R 2/14/2011 820 THF
Trip Blank 2/14/2011
/
./
Please notify Ryan Palmer of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediatelyl Thank you.
/
Relinquished By:(Signature) Dateffime v: (Signa'ureJ Datemme ~~k/~ 2/17/2011
1300
Relinquished By:(Signature) 7 Received By:(Signature) Danm~e ~OAl\.t~Q.. &"'-~ ') "2 Ii 1\
f\A ., '. ~a
./
Lab Set ID : \ \ 0 ~2-"2/2-
SaIJl'Ples Were: COC Tape Was: Container. Type:
~hippedBy: tl\-"S Present on Outer Package o A W AL Supplied Plastic
o Hand Delivered ~s DNa DN/A o A W AL Supplied Clear Glass ./
o Ambient unbzn on Outer package o A WAL Supplied Amber Glass /
~hilled [] es DNo DN/A .
Temperature '"?). ~ DC Presen~mple
o A WAL Supplied VOAffO:1s
o Amber 0 Clear 0 Headspa No Headspace
Rec. Broken/Leaking DYes rt"No DN/A DYes 0 DN/A o Non A W AL Suppliedj26iitainer
Notes:
Properly Preserved
Notes:
Rec. Within Hold
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &N03
Nutrients
O&G
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TP04
TPH
'---Procedure. 1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
.6)
7)
/
Unbroken on sa%
DYes DNo /A
rrt"es DNo DN/A Notes:
~Yes DNa
.
Preservative All pHs OK
pH <2 H2SO4
pH <2 H2S04
PH >12 NaOH .
pH <2 HN03
pH <2 H2SO4 .
pH <2 H2SO4
pH<2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH> 9NaOH, ZnAC
pH <2 H2SO4 /
pH <2 H3P04 /
pH <2 H2SO4 /
pH <2HCL /"
/'
/
/
('
Pour a small amount of sample In the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
7"
7
./
./
/
Discrepancies Between Labels and COC
Notes:
tJ)
/
/
/'
/
;7
/'
/'"
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag coe and notify client for further instructions
Place client conversation on cac
Samples may be adjusted at client request
~ -
No. ReV
./
DYes U-N'O
EN:RGY
..... H , 1/1',
www.energylab.com
WIytIaI~Sllrr:.11ISt
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 100-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gilielts, WY 81&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
March 10, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11020163 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 6 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 2/4/2011 for analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11020163-001 MW-11 02/02/11 12 :50 02/04/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11020163-002 MW-25 02/02/11 13 : 10 02/04/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020163-003 MW-30 02/01/11 12 :40 02104/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020163-004 MW-31 02/01/11 14 :35 02/04/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020163-005 Trip Blank 5521 02/02/11 00 :00 02/04/11 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs , Standard List
C11020163-006 Temp Blank 02/02/11 00 :00 02/04/11 Aqueous Temperature
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 . Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: 1l~ ~ YVI!'tL-
Report Proofing Specialist
Digitally signed by
Kathy Hamre
Date: 2011.03.10 12:41 :51 -07:00
Page 1 of 28 .,,/
www.energylab.com
WJrtJuI tzuJIacI SiB. 1151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette WY 888·688·7115 • Ra Id C SD 888·872·1225 • CoUe e Station TX 888·690·221 B
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater Report Date: 03/10/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11020163 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli·b . Energy Laboratories, Inc .. Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 28
EN:RGY
)\ \. ~ I I, • I ,.,1; •
www.energyteb.com
AMIftIaI~"'1U
Haiena, MT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT BGO·135·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette, WY 8&&·18&·1115 • Rapid City, SD 188·&72·1225 • College Station, 1X 888-69D·2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2320 B
Sample 10: MBLK
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Sample 10: LCS
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Sample 10: Cll020163·002AOUP
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Sample 10: Cll020163·002AMS
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
3 Method Blank
NO mg/L
NO mg/L
NO mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
209 mg/L
Sample Duplicate
332 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
467 mg/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
RL %REC Low limit High Limit
1
1
5.0
5.0
5.0
105
108
Run: MANTECH_ll 0207B
Run: MANTECH_11 02078
90 110
Run: MANTECH_ll0207B
Run: MANTECH_ll 0207B
80 120
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.2
Batch: R142527
02/07/11 16:01
02/07/11 16:17
02/07/11 17:07
10
02/07/11 17:15
Page 13 of 28
EN:RGY
,'\1 ,,,,.,Il..lj-tl.·,
www.energylab.com
MI/fIIQf UufIftct SIwu 1m
Helena, MT 877-412-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-188-1175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2219
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLKC
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS1_ Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 985 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020164-002AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 2410 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020164·004AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3450 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: BAL-1_110204A
10
Run: BAL-1_110204A
10 98 90 110
Run: BAL-1 110204A -
10
Run: BAL-1_110204A
10 101 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.1
Batch: R142563
02/04/11 15:31
02/04/11 15:31
02/04/11 15:37
10
02/04/11 15:37
Page 14 of 28
EI\ERGY
,. .' JI .;,/ ,II (,' .,
www.energylab.com
AMI/fJt:M~SIIu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A450D-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-11D215
Chloride
Sample 10: C11020163-D04A
Chloride
Sample 10: C11020163-D04A
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-11D215
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
320 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
325 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3550 mg/L
Batch: 11 0215-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/1115:08
0.5
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/11 15:41
1.0 99 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/11 15 :43
1.0 102 90 110 1.6 10
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/11 16:31
1.0 100 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 15 of 28
EI\ERGY www.energylab.com Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-888-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 • Collega Station, lX 888-690-2218 .~,. '1,/, I ~)' ill •• ItiII/fIIr:.i builHr.I SItrc, 1m
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-F C
Sample 10: MBLK
Fluoride
Sample 10: LCS
Fluoride
Sample 10: MB-28918
Fluoride
Sample 10: C11020163-004AMS
Fluoride
Sample 10: C11020163-004AMSO
Fluoride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
0.02 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
1.00 mg/L
Method Blank
0.02 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
1.78 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
1.82 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO
Run: MANTECH_11 0207A
0.008
Run: MANTECH_110207A
0.10 98 90 110
Run: MANTECH_110207A
0.008
Run: MANTECH_110207A
0.10 95 80 120
Run: MANTECH_110207A
0.10 99 80 120 2.2
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
03/10/11
C11020163
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R142514
02/07/11 11 :57
02/07/11 12:00
02/07/11 12:06
02/07/11 13 :38
02/07/11 13:40
10
Page 16 of 28
www.energylab.com EN:RGY
•• ~' .~J! :\r':f~" ., AIuIytJt:M Exa/IItIa SIIrcI1W
Helena, MT 877·472-0711 • BIllings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillatte, WY 88&-888-7175 . Rapid City, so 888-672-1225 . Collega Station, TX 888-680-2218
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: ICVC110204_1
pH
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: C11020163-001AOUP
pH
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
6.90 S.u. 0.010 101
Sample Duplicate
7.83 S.u. 0.010
98
Analytical Run: ORION555A-2_110204A
02/04/11 14:51
102
Run: ORION555A-2_11 0204A 02/04/11 15 :32
3 0.4
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 17 of 28
EI\ERGY
/,~ 'J./ .. , ~I~II .,
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
ProJect: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Kelena, MT 877·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·«89 . Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 . College Slatlon, TX 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A4500·NH3 G
Sample 10: MBLK·6
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: LCS·7
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: C11020163-Q020MS
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10~ C11020163·0020MSO
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mglL
Laboratory Control Sample
1.92 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.53 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.55 mg/L
Batch: R14271 0
Run: TECHNICON_11 0211 A 02111/11 11 :40
0.02
Run: TECHNICON_110211A 02111 III 11 :42
0.050 96 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0211A 02111/11 11 :53
0.050 102 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_11 0211 A 02111/11 11 :56
0.050 103 80 120 0.8 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 18 of 28
EN:RGY www.energylab.com Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 118-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-680-2218 ."\, ,i l', .• \11 tl; '-' AM/yIJa/ EB"-SIIu 1m
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-S04 E
Sample 10: LCS-1_110210
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-1_110210
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11010659-010AOUP
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11020163-004AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11020163-004AMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDe -Minimum detectable concentration
Laboratory Control Sample
5010 mg/L
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Duplicate
120 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
1030 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
1020 mg/L
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C 11020163
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: TURB-2_11 021 OA
100 104 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110210A
0.8
Run: TURB-2_110210A
2.0
Run: TURB-2_110210A
25 102 90 110
Run: TURB-2_11 021 OA
25 101 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 11021 0_C S04-TURB-W
02/10/11 11 :07
1.4
0.5
02/10/11 11: 1 0
02/10/11 11 :26
10
02/10/11 12:00
02/10/11 12:02
10
Page 19 of 28
EI\ERGY
."\ , 1I ~. I I ;" II ~~
www.energylab.com
AMIyfkM EII:IlIIKI SIIrt:I 1m
Halena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88B-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 . College Station, lX 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: MB-110215A 5 Method Blank
Calcium ND mg/L
Iron ND mg/L
Magnesium ND mg/L
Potassium ND mg/L
Sodium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-110215A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Calcium 48.3 mg/L
Iron 0.972 mg/L
Magnesium 50.2 mg/L
Potassium 43.7 mg/L
Sodium 46.5 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020156-003BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike
Calcium 104 mg/L
Iron 1.98 mg/L
Magnesium 97.9 mg/L
Potassium 95.2 mg/L
Sodium 560 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020156-003BMSO 4 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Calcium 103 mg/L
Magnesium 98.0 mg/L
Potassium 93.4 mg/L
Sodium 554 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R142791
Run: ICP2-C_11 0215A 02/15/11 12:54
0.2
0.002
0.05
0.02
0.3
Run: ICP2-C_11 0215A 02/15/11 12 :58
0.50 97 85 115
0.030 97 85 115
0.50 100 85 115
0.50 87 85 115
0.50 93 85 115
Run: ICP2-C_110215A 02/15/11 15:04
1.0 95 70 130
0.030 94 70 130
1.0 95 70 130
1.0 92 70 130
1.0 70 130 A
Run: ICP2-C_11 0215A 02/15/11 15:08
1.0 94 70 130 1.0 20
1.0 95 70 130 0.1 20
1.0 90 70 130 1.9 20
1.0 70 130 0.9 20 A
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 20 of 28
EN:RGY
• H("I HI •
www.energylab.com
ANITtiUI~~ IW
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD BBB-Bl2-1225 • College Station, TX BBB-680-221 B
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: Cll020163-001BMS4
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: Cl1020163-001BMSO
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: LRB
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Count Result Units
18 Sample Matrix Spike
0.0529 mg/L
0.0401 mg/L
0.0443 mg/L
0.0510 mg/L
0.0507 mg/L
0.0481 mg/L
0.0504 mg/L
0.194 mg/L
0.00517 mg/L
0.0483 mg/L
0.0496 mg/L
0.0507 mg/L
0.0164 mg/L
0.0485 mg/L
0.0303 mg/L
0.0511
0.0520
0.0458
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
18 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
0.0559 mg/L
0.0428 mg/L
0.0476 mg/L
0.0546
0.0546
0.0512
0.0547
0.200
0.00555
0.0548
0.0526
0.0540
0.0188
0.0531
0.0371
0.0554
0.0558
0.0487
18 Method Blank
NO
NO
NO
NO
0.0003
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C 11020163
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.0010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.010
4E-05
3E-05
7E-05
5E-05
lE-05
105
80
89
102
100
96
101
98
103
94
98
99
82
97
61
101
104
90
111
86
95
109
108
102
109
109
111
107
104
106
94
106
74
110
111
96
Run: ICPMS4-C_l1 0207 A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS4-C_l1 0207 A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0207 A
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
RPO RPDLlmit Qual
5.6
6.4
7.4
6.8
7.4
6.3
8.3
2.7
7.1
13
5.9
6.3
14
9.1
20
8.1
7.0
6.3
Batch: R142549A
02108/11 06:43
S
02/08/11 06:50
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
02/07/11 18:41
Page 21 of 28
EN:RGY
,,,\' I."II-l ( ••
www.energylab.com
AM/f*II ElwIIwl:ISItru /151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 86&-188-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 . ColiegeStation, TX 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/10/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater Work Order: C11020163
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R142549A
Sample 10: LRB 18 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_l10207A 02/07/11 18:41
Copper 8E-05 mg/L BE-05
Lead 5E-05 mg/L 2E-05
Manganese 0.0001 mg/L 2E-05
Mercury 4E-05 mg/L 2E-05
Molybdenum 0.0003 mg/L 8E-05
Nickel NO mg/L 5E-05
Selenium NO mg/L 5E-05
Silver NO mg/L 8E-05
Thallium NO mg/L 2E-05
Tin 0.0008 mg/L 0.0002
Uranium 2E-05 mg/l 8E-OB
Vanadium NO mg/L l E-05
Zinc 0.003 mg/L 0.0001
Sample 10: LFB 18 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0207A 02/07/11 18:48
Arsenic 0.0513 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
Beryllium 0.0517 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
Cadmium 0.0530 mg/L 0.0010 lOB 85 115
Chromium 0.0534 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Cobalt 0.0522 mg/L 0.0010 104 85 115
Copper 0.0547 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
lead 0.0518 mg/l 0.0010 104 85 115
Manganese 0.0510 mg/L 0.0010 102 85 115
Mercury 0.00529 mglL 0.0010 105 85 115
Molybdenum 0.0530 mg/L 0.0010 lOB 85 115
Nickel 0.0540 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Selenium 0.0524 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Silver 0.021B mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Thallium 0.0513 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
Tin 0.0513 mg/L 0.0010 101 85 115
Uranium 0.0502 mg/L 0.00030 100 85 115
Vanadium 0.0528 mg/L 0.0010 lOB 85 115
Zinc 0.0558 mg/l 0.0010 105 85 115
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 22 of 28
EI\ERGY
,~ . I ~ ,', I ! J I ~ •
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Halana, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88B-I88-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-872-1225 • College Siallon, TX 881-680-2218
QAlQC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High LImit RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: LCS-2
Nitrogen, Nitrale+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11020163-D020MS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11020163-0020MSO
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
0.07 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
2.47 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.22 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.09 mg/L
Batch: R142502
Run: TECHNICON_110204A 02/04/11 13:59
0.06
Run: TECHNICON_11 0204A 02/04/11 14:01
0.10 96 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0204A 02/04/11 16:51
0.10 107 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0204A 02/04/11 16:54
0.10 100 90 110 6.0 10
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 23 of 28
EN:RGY
,., ",' .1' Ill'
www.energylab.com
AIlII1fkMExu/lnaSlltc.,1S1
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, PIT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&·188·7175 • Rapid Ctty, SD 888-&72-1225 • ColiegB Station, IX 888-610-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: MB-GA-0402
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Count Result
3 Method Blank
-0.03
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.05
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.09
Units
pCilL
pCi/L
pCilL
Sample 10: LCS-GA-0402
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Laboratory Control Sample
Sample 10: TAP WATERMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: TAP WATERMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
10.4 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike
10.4 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
10.4 pCi/L
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: G5000W_110301 B
Run: G5000W_110301B
99 70 130
Run: G5000W_110301 B
97 70 130
Run: G5000W_11 0301 B
97 70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLImit Qual
0.2
Batch: GA-0402
03/08/11 18:09
U
03/08/11 18:09
03108/11 18:09
03/08/11 18 :09
16.4
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 24 of 28
EN:RGY
.. I 'i I I I {I, ~
www.energylab.com
AIuIytJm~ SIRu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&6-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater
Analyte Count
Method: SW8260B
Result Units
Sample 10: 02091 CLCS_ 4 16 Laboratory Control Sample
Acetone 110 ug/L
Benzene 12 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 11 ug/L
Chloroform 12 ug/L
Chloromethane 10 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 21 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 130 ug/L
Methylene chloride 9.8 ug/L
Naphthalene 11 ug/L
o-Xylene 11 ug/L
Toluene 11 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 32 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: 020911_MBLK_6 16 Method Blank
Acetone ND ug/L
Benzene ND ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L
Chloroform ND ug/L
Chloromethane ND ug/L
m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L
Methylene chloride ND ug/L
Naphthalene ND ug/L
o-Xylene ND ug/L
Toluene ND ug/L
Xylenes, Total ND ug/L
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C11020163-004EMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike
Acetone 1200 ug/L
Benzene 120 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 110 ug/L
Chloroform 110 ug/L
Chloromethane 110 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 220 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 1200 ug/L
Methylene chloride 110 ug/L
Naphthalene 100 ug/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
200
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
Report Date: 03/10/11
Work Order: C11020163
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R142634
Run: SATURNCA_110209B 02/09/11 11 :16
114 70 130
116 70 130
108 70 130
117 70 130
104 70 130
107 70 130
127 70 130
98 70 130
107 70 130
105 70 130
112 70 130
107 70 130
100 80 120
106 70 130
111 80 130
104 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_110209B 02/09/11 12:28
102 80 120
122 70 130
107 80 120
101 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_110209B 02/09/11 17:16
118 70 130
116 70 130
110 70 130
114 70 130
114 70 130
108 70 130
119 70 130
109 70 130
100 70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 25 of 28
EN:RGY
.'-. ~ ,) I I • , I ' 'I r •
www.energylab.com
AIYIyIiuIIxt.u-.•• ,m Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette, WY 888·188·7115 • Rapid City, SD 888·872·1225 • College Station, 1X 888·&80·221 B
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/10/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater Work Order: C11020163
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R142634
Sample 10: C11020163·004EMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_110209B 02/09/11 17:16
o-Xylene 110 ug/L 10 108 70 130
Toluene 110 ug/L 10 110 70 130
Xylenes, Total 320 ug/L 10 108 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 99 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 103 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 105 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 105 80 120
Sample 10: C11020163-004EMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SATURNCA_110209B 02/09/11 17:52
Acetone 1200 ug/L 200 117 70 130 1.0 20
Benzene 120 ug/L 10 115 70 130 0.3 20
Carbon tetrachloride 110 ug/L 10 110 70 130 0.7 20
Chloroform 120 ug/L 10 116 70 130 1.7 20
Chloromethane 110 ug/L 10 109 70 130 5.0 20
m+p-Xylenes 220 ug/L 10 108 70 130 0.0 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 1200 ug/L 200 123 70 130 3.6 20
Methylene chloride 110 ug/L 10 106 70 130 3.0 20
Naphthalene 100 ug/L 10 102 70 130 1.2 20
o-Xylene 100 ug/L 10 104 70 130 3.0 20
Toluene 110 ug/L 10 109 70 130 0.7 20
Xylenes, Total 320 ug/L 10 107 70 130 1.0 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 100 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 106 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 103 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 101 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 26 of 28
EN:RGY
., I 'I 11."_
www.energylab.eom
~/rzt~ S'IIIu 1m
Helena, liT 877-472-0711 • Billings, liT 800-735-4489 • Cuper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY .'&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • Collage Station, 1)( 888-&10-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
IIIIII~ II~ ~III~! ~III ~~IIIIIIII ~IIIIIIII~I
C11020163
Login completed by: Edith McPike
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 2/8/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Sam pies in proper containerlbottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blanktemperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water-pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes III
Yes III
Yes D
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
2"C On Ice
Yes III
Yes III
Date Received: 2/4/2011
Received by: ckw
Carrier name: FedEx
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No 0
No D
No D
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present III
No VOAvials submitted D
Not Applicable D
Page 27 of 28
~
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record page-Lof~
Company Name:
-D--t."""·s~-,v
Report Mail Address: f-(). ~e'~ j;/ t{ wi;" c]
Invoice Address:~j
fI1,~.s
St.'1 fAr t/Ie) /1
Special Report/Formats:
D ow o EOO/EOT(Electronic Data)
D POTWMJWTP
D State:
Format:, ____ _ o LEVEL IV D Other:----o NELAC
(Name, Location, Interval, etc_)
Collection
Date
tV;1A 1-1I l2..nLll
2/1./1/
3
MIA! ~.3.& i2Llw_
4 MI....) -:~ J 1:2.1 I J 11
5-'I~~"1 fiL,,'!Lt:::. ~\
6
7
8
9
Collection
Time
12ro
1310
J 2ifO
1 Jl3.5
PLEASE PRINT (F'[ovide as much information as Dossible.l
Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. 1 Sample Origin
I ~ j-~lIt~ kr'L ~YLtrl'!L#~'l_ t:I'"'AlSt", .. " ~u" 't"
Contact Name: Phone/Fax:
C{, !rt /~ i-rY -Z"[2-/
Invoice Contact & Phone:
3: &IT&i\[6 W@O@ W~®(lJ)~~ID
CI ~ ~o cn~ ~al~OI (j) ]j>~ i6'1ii t;'-... c Cllc;,,,,3: ~
0>= ~ C) ""-u> 0 0 c o<t:~liDl~ ~
,-diSc',:::: '"\ ~ a.ClI 00 ~ "E~I16' ....... :::J<1l.!::"&3: \..... zc..«IQ)o ~ E >1 ctI
CIl ~
MATRIX J
t. -lA) 1')('
?-w 1)(
t..-w IX ?a-rAJ 1 y.
0 w
J: (J « I-l-«
W w
rJ)
State: v..r Yes [J.--No 0
Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~ JLI/'J~ JPnr/L,
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Ord~y ...
~I R
t:
"0 c: e 1 U co e .... :::J ~ 1 5
ctI "0 c: co en I H
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
Comments:
.-LX ~r -
Oiarll(S):
C;,'e¥1 -I-
Receipt Temp
i:2. °c
0011;8: 0
Custody Seal
On Bottle $N On Cooler N
Intact Y N
I
Signatu re y
Match
,~
~
~ Wi L'= ~
~ W ~ ICO)
~ -~ 10 '~~O/U ~
~ Custody Sfgnature
S, Record Signalure ~ MU5Tbe -
• f7) , r-/I IIlns ure: 51 a ned Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: tV ~
\./
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories. Inc. may be subcontracted to oth,er Cehifled laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be cle~otated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
EN:RGY .'
-', _I "d L ,,j'1 '-'
W'iIW.energylab.com
AMIJfIaI EInIIKI SIttw II1U
Halena, MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 8OD·135·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235-0515
GillBIt8, WY 888·888·7175 • Rapid City, SD 818·&72·1225 • Collage Sialion, TX 888-811102218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
March 15, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11020352 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 8 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 2/11/2011 for analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11020352-001 MW-14 02/07/11 13 :00 02/11/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11020352-002 MW-22 02/08/11 12:15 02/11/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020352-003 MW-65 02/08/11 12:15 02 /11 /11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020352-004 MW-32 02/09/11 13 :20 02 /11 /11 Aqueous Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
C11020352-005 MW-27 02/09/11 12 :00 02/11 /11 Aqueous Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
C11020352-006 MW-24 02/10/11 08:00 02/11/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11020352-007 Trip Blank 5515 02/07/11 00 :00 02/11 /11 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C 11020352-008 Temp Blank 02/10/11 00 :00 02/11/11 Aqueous Temperature
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601. Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please cal l.
Report Approved By: o¥~£) LJ~~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011 .03.15 13:40:03 -06:00
Page 1 of 31 ,/
www.energylab.com
AMI1tiUI fxuIIHu SIRu '151 Helene, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WV 88.-235-0515
Gillette WV 866-186-7115 • Ra Id CI SD 888-&12-1225 · Colle e Station TX 888-S90-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Report Date: 03/15/11
Sample Delivery Group: Cl1020352 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITTAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are hand
delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 31
EN:RGY
. ~ 1· .. 1 ~J ,I, ••
~.energylab.com
~El"'*-SIttu ,m Helena, NT 877-472-1711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillette, WY 81&-186-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 . College Station, IX 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: C11020352 --------------------------------------------------------------,
Analyte
Method: A2320 B
Sample 10: MBLK
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
Count Result Units
3 Method Blank
2
ND
2
mglL
mg/L
mglL
Sample 10: LCS Laboratory Control Sample
Alkalinity. Total as CaC03 211 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020361-00SAOUP 3 Sample Duplicate
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 112 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 136 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020361-00SAMS Sample Matrix Spike
Alkalinity. Total as CaC03 245 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: MANTECH_11021SA
Run: MANTECH_11021SA
5.0 10S 90 110
Run: MANTECH_11 0215A
5.0
5.0
5.0
Run: MANTECH_11021SA
S.O 106 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLImit Qual
0.3
0.2
Batch: R142789
02l1S/11 15:42
02/15/11 15:58
02/15/11 17:23
10
10
10
02115111 17:32
Page 14 of 31
Er\ERGY
. \ 'I , ., I r '~I. . ,
www.energylab.com
"""'~JIiIa 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4481 . Casper, WY 888-235-D515
GilieHe, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 181-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: A2540 C
Result Units
Sample 10: MBLK1_ Method Blank
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCSC Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 995 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020352-002AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 6790 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020361-007BMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2230 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: C11020352
RL %REC Low Limit High limit
Run: BAL-1 _110211B
10
Run: BAL-1_110211B
10 99 90 110
Run : BAL-C110211B
17
Run : BAL-e 11 0211 B
10 100 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.1
Batch: R142743
02/11 /11 14:24
02/11/11 14:25
02/11111 14:30
10
02/11/11 14:36
Page 15 of 31
--~ EI\ERGY
.\ 1.",[, J.' '_
www.energylab.com
AM/tIkM~ SIlu 1m Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-8515
Gillette, W'f 88&-118-7175 • Rapid City, so 188-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-1.8-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: Cll020352
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-110215
Chloride
Sample 10: Cll020352-005A
Chloride
Sample 10: Cll020352-005A
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-110215
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
222 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
224 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3550 mg/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: 11 0215-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/11 15:08
0.5
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/1116:02
1.0 99 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/11 16:04
1.0 100 90 110 0.8 10
Run: TITRATION_110215A 02/15/11 16:31
1.0 100 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 31
EN:RGY
,', ,)1 "d I !oL, "
WWN.energyfab.com
~~SIItu 'lSI
Helen., JIlT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 . Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 8&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, so 188-&12-1225 • ColiegeStation,1X 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4S00-F C
Sample 10: MBLK
Fluoride
Sample 10: LCS
Fluoride
Sample 10: Cll020361-002AMS
Fluoride
Sample 10: Cll020361-002AMSO
Fluoride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
0.02 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
0.980 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
1.28 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
1.28 mg/L
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: C 11020352
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: R142706
Run: MANTECH_ll 0211 A 02/11/1113:11
0.008
Run: MANTECH_ll 0211 A 02/11/11 13:13
0.10 96 90 110
Run: MANTECH_ll0211A 02/11/11 14:32
0.10 96 80 120
Run: MANTECH_l1 0211 A 02/11/11 14:35
0.10 96 80 120 0.0 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 17 of 31
EN:RGY
,', d ,,\I \ ,II, "
www.energylab.wm
AM/ftJcMfllull_:d l1tu /1St
Helena, NT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·73,·4488 • CBSpet, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette, WY 88&·188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 118·&72·1225 • Collage Station, IX 118-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: A4500·H B
Result Units
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: C11020352
RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Sample 10: ICVC110211_2
pH
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
Analytical Run: ORION555A-2_110211B
02/11/11 14:16
Method: A4500·H B
Sample 10: C11020361·004AOUP
pH
Sample 10: C11020361·007AOUP
pH
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDe -Minimum detectable concentration
6.91 S.u. 0.010 101
Sample Duplicate
7.82 s.u. 0.010
Sample Duplicate
8.07 S.u. 0.010
98 102
Run: ORION555A-2_11 0211 B
Run: ORION555A-2_11 0211 B
0.1
0.1
02/11/11 15:05
3
02/11/1115:17
3
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 18 of 31
EI\ERGY
,'\ ~ ) I. \. I I I. "-"
www.energylab.com
AIu/tIIaI ~SIiIA '151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Casper, YN888-235-0515
Gillette, YNB88-IB8-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College Station, 1J( 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500·NH3 G
Sample 10: MBLK-6
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: LCS·?
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: C11020352-0020MS
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: C11020352-0020MSO
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
2.02 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.28 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.30 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO
Run: TECHNICON_11 0214A
0.02
Run: TECHNICON_11 0214A
0.050 101 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0214A
0.050 10? 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_11 0214A
0.050 108 80 120 0.9
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
03/15/11
C11020352
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R142?39
02/14/11 12:18
02/14/11 12:20
02/14/11 12:31
02114/11 12 :34
10
Page 19 of 31
EN:RGY
I"' '1 ••• 1. III •
www.energylab.com f
AMIytIuIlX~ s.u /151
HBIBna, MT 877-472-G7l1 • Billings, MT 800-73'-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, 'NY 8&&-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-&8D-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-S04 E
Sample 10: LCS-l_ll0217
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-l_ll0217
Sulfate
Sample 10: Cll020352-005AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: Cl1020352-005AMSO
Sulfate
Method: A4500-S04 E
Sample 10: LCS-l_ll0303
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-l_ll0303
Sulfate
Sample 10: Cl1020544-012AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: Cll020544-012AMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Laboratory Control Sample
4880 mg/L
Method Blank
1 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
642 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
640 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
4810 mg/L
Method Blank
2 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2550 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2560 mg/L
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: C11020352
RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 110217_C S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_11 0217 A 02/17/11 15:03
100 102 90 110
Run : TURB-2_110217A 02117/11 15:05
0.8
Run: TURB-2_110217A 02/17/11 15:55
10 97 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110217A 02/17/11 15:58
10 96 90 110 0.3 10
Batch: 110303_1_S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_11 0303A 03/03/11 10:39
100 100 90 110
Run: TURB-2_11 0303A 03/03/11 10:41
0.8
Run: TURB-2_11 0303A 03/03/11 12:51
50 98 90 110
Run: TURB-2_11 0303A 03/03/11 12:54
50 99 90 110 0.4 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 20 of 31
EN:RGY
.', r I •• , I r I ~ 1 •
www.energylab.com
AM/yIIft/t r-r-. SIIa 'I!I
Halena, NT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 . Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid CI1y, so 188-&72-1225 • College Station, 1)( 888-&80-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.7
Sample 10: MB-110216A 5 Method Blank
Calcium ND mg/L
Iron ND mg/L
Magnesium ND mg/L
Potassium ND mg/L
Sodium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB-110216A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Calcium 48.0 mg/L
Iron 0.963 mg/L
Magnesium 48.7 mg/L
Potassium 43.4 mg/L
Sodium 48.9 mg/L
Sample ID: C11020307-002BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike
Calcium 128 mg/L
Iron 1.98 mg/L
Magnesium 103 mg/L
Potassium 92.6 mg/L
Sodium 274 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020307-002BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Calcium 127 mg/L
Iron 1.96 mg/L
Magnesium 103 mg/L
Potassium 93.1 mg/L
Sodium 276 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: C11020352
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
0.2
0.002
0.05
0.02
0.3
0.50
0.030
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.0
0.030
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.030
1.0
1.0
1.0
96
96
97
87
98
98
97
94
90
100
97
96
94
90
101
Run: ICP2-C_110216A
Run: ICP2-C_110216A
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
Run: ICP2-C_11 0216A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
Run: ICP2-C_110216A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Batch: R142839
02/16/11 12 :30
02/16/11 12 :34
02116111 17 :34
02/16/11 17 :38
0.5 20
1.2 20
0.4 20
0.5 20
0.4 20
Page 21 of 31
EN:RGY
J",' <. )1 11' I I ~ I • ,.
WWN.energylab.com
AMITfIaI~StIm 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4481 • Cnper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-&88-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-680-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/15/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C 11020352
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Method: E200.7 Batch: R143109
Sample 10: MB-110225A 5 Method Blank Run: ICP2-C_110225A 02/25/11 11 :50
Calcium ND mg/L 0.2
Iron 0.002 mg/L 0.002
Magnesium ND mg/L 0.05
Potassium ND mg/L 0.02
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.03
Sample 10: LFB-110225A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP2-C_11 0225A 02/25/11 11 :54
Calcium 49.6 mg/L 0.50 99 85 115
Iron 0.965 mg/L 0.030 96 85 115
Magnesium 51.5 mg/L 0.50 103 85 115
Potassium 45.0 mg/L 0.82 90 85 115
Sodium 47.4 mg/L 0.50 94 85 115
Sample 10: C11020352-001BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICP2-C_110225A 02/25/11 13:00
Calcium 730 mg/L 1.1 84 70 130
Iron 4.89 mg/L 0.030 95 70 130
Magnesium 395 mg/L 1.0 96 70 130
Potassium 235 mg/L 1.0 88 70 130
Sodium 582 mg/L 1.4 98 70 130
Sample 10: C11020352-001 BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP2-C_11 0225A 02/25/11 13:04
Calcium 731 mg/L 1.1 85 70 130 0.2 20
Iron 4.92 mg/L 0.030 96 70 130 0.7 20
Magnesium 396 mg/L 1.0 96 70 130 0.4 20
Potassium 240 mg/L 1.0 89 70 130 1.9 20
Sodium 580 mg/L 1.4 97 70 130 0.4 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 22 of 31
EN:RGY
,\\ )1 ."ll.I~1 •
www.energylab.com
AIuIyfim rzullltN:l SIIu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TJ( 888-690-2218
QAlQC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/15/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020352
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPDLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R142806A
Sample 10: C11020352-006AMS4 7 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0215A 02/15/11 20:39
Beryllium 0.0376 mg/L 0.010 75 70 130
Cadmium 0.0486 mg/L 0.010 92 70 130
Chromium 0.0519 mg/L 0.050 104 70 130
Copper 0.0475 mg/L 0.010 94 70 130
Lead 0.0527 mg/L 0.050 105 70 130
Molybdenum 0.0517 mg/L 0.0010 100 70 130
Thallium 0.0544 mg/L 0.0010 106 70 130
Sample 10: C11020352-006AMSO 7 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run : ICPMS4-C_ll0215A 02/15/11 20:46
Beryllium 0.0368 mg/L 0.010 74 70 130 2.0 20
Cadmium 0.0485 mg/L 0.010 91 70 130 0.3 20
Chromium 0.0522 mg/L 0.050 104 70 130 0.6 20
Copper 0.0479 mg/L 0.010 95 70 130 0.9 20
Lead 0.0531 mg/L 0.050 106 70 130 0.8 20
Molybdenum 0.0519 mg/L 0.0010 100 70 130 0.4 20
Thallium 0.0551 mg/L 0.0010 108 70 130 1.4 20
Sample 10: LFB 7 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0215A 02/15/11 11 :59
Beryllium 0.0465 mg/L 0.0010 93 85 115
Cadmium 0.0504 mg/L 0.0010 101 85 115
Chromium 0.0546 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Copper 0.0501 mg/L 0.0010 100 85 115
Lead 0.0543 mg/L 0.0010 109 85 115
Molybdenum 0.0514 mg/L 0.0010 103 85 115
Thallium 0.0548 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Sample ro: LRB 7 Method Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_l10215A 02/15/11 11 :52
Beryllium NO mg/L 3E-05
Cadmium NO mg/L 7E-05
Chromium NO mg/L 5E-05
Copper NO mg/L 6E-05
Lead NO mg/L 2E-05
Molybdenum NO mg/L 8E-05
Thallium NO mg/L 2E-05
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 23 of 31
EN:RGY
• !.' >l. ,I l ., ~ _ "
www.energylab.com
AMIytIMrz~ Silfu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, Wi 888-235-0515
Gillette, 'NY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, TJ( 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: Cll020352-006AMS4 13 Sample Matrix Spike
Arsenic 0.0535 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0584 mg/L
Lead 0.0541 mg/L
Manganese 5.08 mg/L
Mercury 0.00571 mg/L
Nickel 0.0809 mg/L
Selenium 0.0593 mg/L
Silver 0.0158 mg/L
Thallium 0.0564 mg/L
Tin 0.0461 mg/L
Uranium 0.0570 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0562 mg/L
Zinc 0.0922 mg/L
Sample 10: Cl1020352-006AMSO 13 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 0.0535 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0595 mg/L
Lead 0.0546 mg/L
Manganese 5.12 mg/L
Mercury 0.00577 mglL
Nickel 0.0813 mg/L
Selenium 0.0585 mg/L
Silver 0.0162 mg/L
Thallium 0.0571 mg/L
Tin 0.0483 mg/L
Uranium 0.0578 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0559 mg/L
Zinc 0.0922 mg/L
Sample 10: LRB 13 Method Blank
Arsenic NO mg/L
Cobalt NO mg/L
Lead NO mg/L
Manganese NO mg/L
Mercury NO mg/L
Nickel NO mg/L
Selenium NO mg/L
Silver NO mg/L
Thallium NO mg/L
Tin 0.0003 mg/L
Uranium 2E-OS mg/L
Vanadium NO mg/L
Zinc 0.003 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: Cll020352
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: R142844A
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0216A 02/17/11 00:26
0.0010 107 70 130
0.010 101 70 130
0.050 108 70 130
0.010 70 130 A
0.0010 114 70 130
0.050 99 70 130
0.0010 108 70 130
0.010 79 70 130
0.0010 110 70 130
0.0010 92 70 130
0.00030 110 70 130
0.0010 112 70 130
0.010 86 70 130
Run: ICPMS4-C_ll 0216A 02117/11 00:32
0.0010 107 70 130 0.0 20
0.010 103 70 130 1.7 20
0.050 109 70 130 1.0 20
0.010 70 130 0.9 20 A
0.0010 115 70 130 1.1 20
0.050 100 70 130 0.6 20
0.0010 106 70 130 1.4 20
0.010 81 70 130 2.4 20
0.0010 111 70 130 1.1 20
0.0010 97 70 130 4.6 20
0.00030 112 70 130 1.3 20
0.0010 111 70 130 0.6 20
0.010 85 70 130 0.1 20
Run: ICPMS4-C_l1 0216A 02/16/11 13:25
4E-05
lE-05
2E-05
2E-05
2E-05
5E-OS
SE-05
8E-OS
2E-05
0.0002
8E-06
lE-05
0.0001
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 24 of 31
EN:RGY
,', . )1.:-1 (.)~, •
www.energylab.com
AMlTfJuI tx"'-' ~ /ISI
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billing!, MT 800-735-4481 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-880-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/15/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020352
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimlt Qual
Method: E200.B Batch: R142B44A
Sample 10: LFB 13 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICPMS4-C_ll0216A 02/16/11 13:32
Arsenic 0.0550 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Cobalt 0.0541 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Lead 0.0536 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Manganese 0.0538 mg/L 0.0010 107 85 115
Mercury 0.00525 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Nickel 0.0549 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Selenium 0.0552 mg/L 0.0010 110 85 115
Silver 0.0217 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Thallium 0.0542 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Tin 0.0528 mg/L 0.0010 105 85 115
Uranium 0.0536 mg/L 0.00030 107 85 115
Vanadium 0.0540 mg/L 0.0010 108 85 115
Zinc 0.0591 mg/L 0.0010 111 85 115
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 25 of 31
EN:RGY
/\ , ) I • ,~ I ~ II ~ t, '.
www.energylab.com
AIu/tfIQI rxc.IIIta SIIa 1m
Helena,!IT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735-4488 • Casper, WY 888·235-0515
Gillette, WY 886·188·7175 • Rapid CHy, SD 188·&72·1225 • College Station, 1X aal.aIO·2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK·1
Nitrogen, Nilrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: LCS·2
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11020361·001EMS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11020361·001EMSO
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
2.52 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.12 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.16 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High LImit RPO
Run: TECHNICON_110215A
0.06
Run: TECHNICON_11 0215A
0.10 101 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_110215A
0.10 106 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_110215A
0.10 108 90 110 1.9
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
03/15/11
C11020352
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R142784
02/15/11 12 :23
02115/11 12:25
02115/11 13:18
02/15/11 13:20
10
Page 26 of 31
EN:RGY
,",\ l'I.,.''-'" .
www.energylab.com
W/ffIaI ExuIIwa SIIru '151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 . Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillette, WY 88&-IM· 7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&80-221 a
OA/oe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: MB·GA·0393
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
-0.06 pCi/L
pC ilL
pCi/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Sample 10: LCS·GA-0393
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: Cll020352-005BMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: Cll020352-005BMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Method: E900.1
0.3
0.6
Laboratory Control Sample
24.1 pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike
21.S pCi/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
23.6 pCi/L
Sample 10: MB·GA·0408 3 Method Blank
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U -O.OS pC ilL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.07 pCi/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.1 pCi/L
Sample 10: LCS·GA·0408 Laboratory Control Sample
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 11.7 pCi/L
Sample 10: TAP WATER·MS Sample Matrix Spike
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 11.4 pCi/L
Sample 10: TAP WATER·MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 10.9 pC ilL
Method: E900.1
Sample 10: MB·GA·0395 3 Method Blank
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U -0.07 pC ilL
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±) 0.06 pCi/L
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC 0.1 pCi/L
Sample 10: LCS·GA-0395 Laboratory Control Sample
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 11 .6 pCi/L
Sample 10: Cll020352-001CMS Sample Matrix Spike
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 20.2 pC ilL
Sample 10: Cl1 020352-001 CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 20.2 pCi/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDe -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/15/11
Work Order: C11020352
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: GSOOOW_110214B
Run: GSOOOW_110214B
11S 70 130
Run: GSOOOW_ll0214B
93 70 130
Run: GSOOOW _11 0214B
102 70 130
Run: GSOOOW_l10311A
Run: GSOOOW_ll0311A
111 70 130
Run: GSOOOW_ll0311A
107 70 130
Run: GSOOOW_l10311A
102 70 130
Run: GS42M_l10217A
Run: G542M_l10217A
111 70 130
Run: GS42M_ll0217A
94 70 130
Run: GS42M_ll0217A
94 70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
9.1
4.4
0.2
Batch: GA-0393
02117/11 18:04
U
02/17/11 18:04
02117111 18:04
02/17/11 18:04
2S.2
Batch: GA-0408
03/14/11 21 :33
U
03114/11 21 :33
03/14/11 21 :33
03/14/11 21 :33
17.7
Batch: GA-0395
02/22/11 22:32
U
02/22/11 22:32
02123/11 05 :25
02/23/11 05:25
17
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 27 of 31
EN:RGY .' I\t_'-.1r."I' ;{I. 'j
www.enet.gyI8b.com
AIu/yIkIII E.ruIIIsD SIttu lISt
Helena, MT877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY &&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, so 188-672-1225 • Colleg8 Station, 1X 188-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/15/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020352
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPD RPDLimlt Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R142719
Sample 10: 021111_LCS3 16 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SATURNCA_ll0211A 02/11/11 17:18
Acetone 120 ug/L 20 116 70 130
Benzene 11 ug/L 1.0 109 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 11 ug/L 1.0 111 70 130
Chloroform 12 ug/L 1.0 118 70 130
Chloromethane 11 ug/L 1.0 107 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 21 ug/L 1.0 105 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 130 ug/L 20 126 70 130
Methylene chloride 11 ug/L 1.0 108 70 130
Naphthalene 11 ug/L 1.0 108 70 130
o-Xylene 10 ug/L 1.0 103 70 130
Toluene 11 ug/L 1.0 107 70 130
Xylenes, Total 31 ug/L 1.0 104 70 130
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 100 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 110 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 110 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 103 80 120
Sample 10: 021111_MBLK_6 16 Method Blank Run: SATURNCA_ll0211A 02/11/11 18:30
Acetone NO ug/L 20
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 98 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 105 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 100 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 102 80 120
Sample 10: C11020361-0051MS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_ll0211A 02/12111 00 :31
Acetone 1200 ug/L 200 116 70 130
Benzene 100 ug/L 10 105 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 110 ug/L 10 112 70 130
Chloroform 110 ug/L 10 114 70 130
Chloromethane 100 ug/L 10 102 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 200 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 1200 ug/L 200 118 70 130
Methylene chloride 100 ug/L 10 104 70 130
Naphthalene 100 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 28 of 31
EN:RGY
/\, I< '11.\ 1'-loll'.
www.energylab.com
AMIyIfuI £ruIiMIcI SIx. tlJl
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135-4489 • Cuper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-116-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/15/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020352
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R142719
Sample 10: C11020361-0051MS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_l10211A 02/12/11 00 :31
o-Xylene 100 ug/L 10 100 70 130
Toluene 100 ug/L 10 100 70 130
Xylenes, Total 300 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 95 BO 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 106 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 100 BO 120
Surr: Toluene-dB 1.0 100 80 120
Sample 10: C11020361-0051MSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SATURNCA_ll0211A 02112111 01 :08
Acetone 1200 ug/L 200 124 70 130 6.3 20
Benzene 110 ug/L 10 110 70 130 4.5 20
Carbon tetrachloride 110 ug/L 10 lOB 70 130 3.6 20
Chloroform 110 ug/L 10 112 70 130 1.4 20
Chloromethane 100 ug/L 10 103 70 130 1.2 20
m+p-Xylenes 210 ug/L 10 104 70 130 3.3 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 1300 ug/L 200 134 70 130 12 20 S
Methylene chloride 110 ug/L 10 106 70 130 2.3 20
Naphthalene 110 ug/L 10 114 70 130 12 20
o-Xylene 100 ug/L 10 102 70 130 1.2 20
Toluene 100 ug/L 10 101 70 130 1.2 20
Xylenes, Total 310 ug/L 10 103 70 130 2.6 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 102 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 106 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 106 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-dB 1.0 103 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Page 29 of 31
EN:RGY
'-', , ..... I r lIlt·.
www.energylab.com
Au/fffaI EIaIIIIa .. IISZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Cuper, WY 818-235-0515
Gillotta, WY 118-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 111-172-1225 • College StatiDn, 1X 818-&81-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
I~II~IIIII ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
C11020352
Login completed by: Corinne Wagner
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 2/14/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Sam pies in proper containerlbottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water· pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes D
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Yes 0
2·C On Ice
Yes 0'
Yes 0'
Date Received: 2/11/2011
Received by: ckw
Carrier name: FedEx
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No 0
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
No D
Not Present D
Not Present D
Not Present 0'
No VOA vials submitted D
Not Applicable D
Page 30 of 31
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page _\_ of _1_ IU'(leV
Bm-liIIilXllB' PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Company Name: Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance:
De.I'i>c(\ M:r\c.s I ~-r U~rtU' G-ro,-\"J. v:..o...tu-;:J..0l/ State: l:.\.T Yes Er No 0
Report Mail Address: Pc Bc>C oX C'\ Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
Blo.1\8,;"...,\ \AI ~'1.'>\1 n~",(\ Pc.. \/'¥l<.r Y3S b''iS ;!2.:tl ....,-:;::,,"U MolI;~'f
Invoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
~"tvlc:.. SUo-"" t....
Special Report'Formats: 3: &~&[b W@O® OOrn@!ID(g@'D'[§@ .. Contact ELI prior to ~IFedfx~ a Q; RUSH sample submittal
~o~£ for charges and Cooler lOis):
cCD=O I Q; 0 ~ R scheduling -See e)~ 4'1t.(;) ._> 0 >-(5 W t:. Instruction Page D ow o EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) BU)~ ~3: 5 3:'5 ro 0) <) :c "0 ReceiptTemp o POTWrwWTP ~ U c Comments: Format: ~~u)I·Q ~ :r ::l U ~ o ... all c oj ~ « 0 °c D State: o LEVEL IV ... •• Q) t::--'1-t-C\I o Other: o NELAC ~~I,g o v ~ ~ t-E On Ice: YJN I'-ro ' ~ « :::l E C1>.= CD 3: <t "( ~ l-S ~o.<t:l ~o -;) ./ w -0 Custody Seal ~ ~ 01 ... E >1 ~ W as
0",_ ~: '" j i 'C ~ E en "0 U)
P -!: On Cooler N .E 1 1 ~ H Intact Y N ~ .~ ({) SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection :-f S MATRIX v \J '/\ \j SIgnature {Y N (Name, Location, Interval, etc.) Date Time Z \-t-Match ~
1
MW iL.\ ~('~~Il I~CO G:.~ vJ 1-~
2 ~ MiN ~ -'g-;l.:>I\ J~LS b-W .x ~
3 6,S ~ MVJ 1:l.-~·;lOI \ t;)..IS G,.-W .,. ftn n
4 3~ kw :;..~-~,\ I~C ) -w "'f.. ~ I
5 M'vJ ;;).7 l;l. .q -J.o II \~ ~-\J Y. "j.. 'I.. ~ 'I.. ~j\~~~
6 1'-\ IN ~'i b.-Ie ·lD\I c>l,DD \-w 'i--'f.-~ ..
I
7-'-r ',p ~\o..t'\k ~JS-~ -7 -.:20'\ \ ~ ~
B ~ 0
9 r!
10 Ic:d}
Custody Relinquished by tpn:r -OatelTlme: slgna/ti ll,_ L R=r.'!!<! by (Prtnl): Oatorn"",: Signature; -r,;"'J\~r }.\b\l~ , .. ll ;1./ Ie.! ;::ttl \ \ lu~C:. ::JaJI..I'\i'. ~ Record Relinqulsh&d by (print): '-.J OatefTime: Signature: U Receiwd by (pripl): OatefTlme: Signature:
MUST be
Signed ""C~~Y"P>lWL talOry: dli/III {'f)/K
~n8Iure;
Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: ') .. ,--tvv'\.
Irt?i~ .Ia~ratori~~~~~~~~~_t~~mplete the analysis requested. In certain Circumstances, samp.!.:s sub~~~~_ t~ _~.~er~~ .~~b~~~.o,~i~, In~;. ~a~ ~~_~~_~oJn~~ct~ !~ O~h~r, C1
\,,~,. ~ ...... o h ,,;to ",t WUlW .. n .. rnvl~b,com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
EN:RGY
,"'.', )1',,1, f/' "_.
www.energylab.com
AM/fIIaI EmfIIcI DIe. 11M
Helena, MT B11-472-0711 • Billings, MT B08-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-8515
Gillette, WY 18&-888-1175 • Rapid City, SD 188-&72-1225 • Collags station, TX 881-610-2218
ANAL VTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
March 24, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11020544 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 16 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 2/18/2011 for
analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11020544-001 MW-2 02/14/11 09 :40 02/18/11 Aqueous Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
C11020544-002 MW-3 02/15/11 10:35 02/18/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Fluoride
C11020544-003 MW-3A 02/16/11 10:05 02/18/11 Aqueous Metals by ICPIICPMS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
C 11 020544-004 MW-5 02/14/11 13 :20 02/18/11 Aqueous Metals by ICPIICPMS, Dissolved
C11020544-005 MW-12 02/15/11 07 :50 02/18/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020544-006 MW-18 02/15/11 14:40 02/18/11 Aqueous Metals by ICPIICPMS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
C11020544-007 MW-28 02/14/11 11 :20 02/18/11 Aqueous Chloride
C11020544-008 MW-20 02/16/11 10:45 02/18/11 Aqueous Metals by ICPIICPMS, Dissolved
Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11020544-009 MW-26 02/16/11 12 :26 02/18/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11 020544-01 0 MW-34 02/16/11 08 :30 02/18/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020544-011 MW-35 02/1 5/11 12 :40 02/18/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11020544-012 MW-70 02/1 5111 14 :40 02/18/11 Aqueous Metals by ICPIICPMS, Dissolved
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
Page 1 of 44 /
r
EN:RGY
,",,-,:'->1·,,1 :....11 .... 1 _~
C11020544-013 MW-60
C11020544-014 MW-35R
C11020544-015 Trip Blank 6092
C11020544-016 Temp Blank
Halana, MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 100·735-44811 • Caspar, WY 881·235-1515
Gil/alta, WY 88&-186·7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-172·1225 . College Station, TX 881-680-2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
02/16/11 13 :00 02/18/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Alkalinity
QA Calculations
Chloride
Fluoride
Nitrogen, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
pH
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
02/14/11 08 :20 02/18/11 Aqueous Same As Above
02/16/11 00 :00 02/18/11 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
02/16/11 00 :00 02/18/11 Aqueous Temperature
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 . Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QAlQC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011.03.24 12:36:31 -06:00
Page 2 of 44
EN:RGY f~
"\!lUI.;,IClll". L-";::"~ www.energylab.com
AM/ytIaI buIIftu smc. IIU
Helena, MT877-472-11711 • Billings, MT BOO-135-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette WY 866·186·7115 • Ra Id CI SO 888·&72·1225 · Colla e Station IX 888·680·2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Report Date: 03/24/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11020544 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITIAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are hand
delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are ND (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SD
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641 , Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515 ; Virginia: 00057; Washington : C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 3 of 44
'.
EN:RGY
_."l.l_01.,",IL.II' .....
www.energylab.com
AIMItfIm~5*u rm
Helena, tiT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 801·735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235·1515
GllleHe, WY 81&-186·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·172·1225 • College Station, 1X 88H80·2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte
Method: A2320 B
Sample 10: C11020543-0D4AMS
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Count Result Units
Sample Matrix Spike
249 mg/L
Sample 10: C11D2D544-013AOUP 3 Sample Duplicate
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03 2.05 mg/L
Carbonate as C03 ND mg/L
Bicarbonate as HC03 2.50 mg/L
Sample 10: MBLK
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Carbonate as C03
Bicarbonate as HC03
3 Method Blank
Sample 10: LCS
Alkalinity, Total as CaC03
Qualifiers:
RL -Analy1e reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
213 mg/L
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: C11020544
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Run: MANTECH_11 021 BB
104 80 120
Run : MANTECH_110218B
Run: MANTECH_11 0218B
Run: MANTECH_11 021 BS
106 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Batch: R142923
02/18/11 19:03
02/18/11 20:17
10
10
10
02/1 B/11 20:32
02/18/11 20:45
Page 26 of 44
EN:RGY
,.,j' l(,/\I t. 1--11. "
www.energylab.com
ItIIIIyIkM ExaIIHa SII/c, 1m
Helena, MT 177-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 86&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-680-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLK1_
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Sample 10: LCS1_
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Sample 10: C11020544-009AMS
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
985 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
5300 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020544-014AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 7.88 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: Cl1020544
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Run : BAL-l_ll0218B
4
Run : BAL-l_110218B
10 98 90 110
Run: BAL-l_ll0218B
10 101 90 110
Run : BAL-l_110218B
10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Batch : R143010
02/18/11 15 :48
02/18/11 15:48
02/18/11 16:00
02118111 16:02
10
Page 27 of 44
EN:RGY
/'! \' '1 /, I,; I ~I r .:
www.energylab.com
~EXuIIHt:I sac. flU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-731-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GllieHa, WY 888-188-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • COIIUgD Station,1X 888-68D-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: C11020544
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-110228
Chloride
Sample 10: C11020664·001A
Chloride
Sample 10: C11020664·001A
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-110228
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
232 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
234 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3610 mg/L
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: 11 0228-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_11 0228A 02128/11 10:46
0.5
Run: TITRATION_110228A
1.0 100 90 110
Run: TITRATION_11 0228A
1.0 101 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110228A
1.0 102 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
0.7
02/28/11 11 :25
02/28/11 11 :46
10
02/28/11 12:25
Page 28 of 44
EN:RGY
,"" ., } I j ~.~ I' ,-< I ••
www.energytab.com
A/uIffk2/~SiJIc.'151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, PM BGO-735-4488 • Casper, WY 881-235-1515
GllleHe, WY 8&8-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-572-1225 • College Station, TX 888-S80-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-F C
Sample 10: MBLK
Fluoride
Sample 10: LCS
Fluoride
Sample 10: C11020544-011AMS
Fluoride
Sample 10: C11020544-011AMSO
Fluoride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
0.02 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
1.00 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
1.24 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
1.24 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO
Run: MANTECH_11 0218A
0.008
Run: MANTECH_110218A
0.10 98 90 110
Run: MANTECH_110218A
0.10 92 80 120
Run: MANTECH_11 0218A
0.10 92 80 120 0.0
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
03/24/11
C11020544
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R142916
02/18/11 12:26
02118111 12:28
02/18/11 16:13
02/18/11 16:16
10
Page 29 of44
EI\ERGY
,'I --. J 11 ,., I ~ ,.1/ ~.
www.energylab.com
AMIyfIettI ~ SfIIu 1m
Helena, lIT 877-472-0711 • Billings, lIT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GllleHe, WY 888-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-172-1225 • College Station, TX 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: C11020544
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: ICV1_110218_2
pH
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: C11020544-010AOUP
pH
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: ICV1_110222_1
pH
Method: A4500-H B
Sample 10: C11020544-012AOUP
pH
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
6.96 s.u. 0.010 101
Sample Duplicate
7.54 s.u. 0.010
Initial Calibration Verification Standard
6.92 s.u. 0.010 101
Sample Duplicate
6.94 s.u. 0.010
98
Analytical Run: ORION555A-2_11 021 BB
02/1 B/11 13:25
102
Batch: 11021 B_2]H-W _555A-2
Run: ORION555A-2_110218B 02/18/11 15:53
3
98
1.6
Analytical Run: ORION555A-2_11 0222A
02/22/11 09:13
102
Run: ORION555A-2_110222A 02122/11 09:46
3 0.4
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 30 of 44
EI\ERGY
.... Il\.)(./\I UllI '.3
www.energylab.com
AIuIyIIa/ rx.u-SIIa '112
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BGO-735-4488 • Casper, WY 881-235-8515
Gillette, WY 868-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-NH3 G
Sample 10: MBLK-6
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: LCS-7
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: Cll 020568-001 EMS
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Sample 10: Cll020568-001EMSO
Nitrogen, Ammonia as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
1.98 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.11 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.17 mg/L
Report Date: 03 /24/11
Work Order: Cll020544
RL %REC Low Limit High limit
Run : TECHNICON_11 0225A
0.02
Run : TECHNICON_ll 0225A
0.050 99 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_ll 0225A
0.050 102 80 120
Run: TECHNICON_11 0225A
0.050 105 80 120
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPDLimlt Qual
2.8
Batch: R143098
02/25/11 11 :50
02/25/11 11 :52
02/25/11 12:34
02/25/11 12:36
10
Page 31 of 44
EI\ERGY
.~.. r.J I I,. , I.~ 1.(' •• ~
www.energylab.com
AMIytIuI EltuIMot:. SIiIu 1m
Helana, Mf 877-472-0711 • Billings, lIT BOO-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-D515
Gillette, WY 8&&-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SO 118-&72-1225 • Coliege Station, 1X 881-&10-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte
Method: A4500-S04 E
Sample 10: C11020544-012AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11020544-012AMSO
Sulfate
Sample 10: LCS-2_110303
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-2_110303
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Count Result Units
Sample Matrix Spike
2550 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2560 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
4890 mg/L
Method Blank
O.B mg/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: C11020544
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 110303_1_S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_110303A 03/03/11 12:51
50 98 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110303A 03/03/11 12:54
50 99 90 110 0.4 10
Run: TURB-2_11 0303A 03/03/11 13:37
100 102 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110303A 03/03/11 13:41
O.B
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 32 of 44
EN:RGY
• \! 'I. " I ( .1 ~. '.
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BGO-73D-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 888-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 881-610-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Report Date: 03/24/11
Project: 1st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020544
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.7 Batch: R143109
Sample 10: MB-110225A 5 Method Blank Run: ICP2-C_11 0225A 02125/11 11 :50
Calcium ND mg/L 0.2
Iron 0.002 mg/L 0.002
Magnesium ND mg/L 0.05
Potassium ND mg/L 0.02
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.03
Sample 10: LFB-110225A 5 Laboratory Fortified Blank Run: ICP2-C_11 0225A 02/25/11 11 :54
Calcium 49.6 mg/L 0.50 99 85 115
Iron 0.965 mg/L 0.030 96 85 115
Magnesium 51.5 mg/L 0.50 103 85 115
Potassium 45.0 mg/L 0.82 90 85 115
Sodium 47.4 mg/L 0.50 94 85 115
Sample 10: C11020352-001 BMS2 5 Sample Matrix Spike Run : ICP2-C_11 0225A 02/25/11 13:00
Calcium 730 mg/L 1.1 84 70 130
Iron 4.89 mg/L 0.030 95 70 130
Magnesium 395 mg/L 1.0 96 70 130
Potassium 235 mg/L 1.0 88 70 130
Sodium 582 mg/L 1.4 98 70 130
Sample 10: C11 020352-001 BMSO 5 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICP2-C_11 0225A 02/25/11 13:04
Calcium 731 mg/L 1.1 85 70 130 0.2 20
Iron 4.92 mg/L 0.030 96 70 130 0.7 20
Magnesium 396 mg/L 1.0 96 70 130 0.4 20
Potassium 240 mg/L 1.0 89 70 130 1.9 20
Sodium 580 mg/L 1.4 97 70 130 0.4 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 33 of 44
EN:RGY
/\\. ..=11."",-",(t{" .....
www.energylab.com
,.",.., DaiIIIIKw SIIIu 1151
Helena, lIlT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 885-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-"2-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&80-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank
Uranium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank
Uranium 0.0518 mglL
Sample 10: C11020554-008AMS4 Sample Matrix Spike
Uranium 0.336 mglL
Sample 10: C11020554-008AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Uranium 0.336 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RL
1E-05
0.00030
0.00030
0.00030
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: C11020544
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R142938
Run: ICPMS2-C_110218A 02/18/11 13 :58
Run: ICPMS2-C_110218A 02/18/11 14:02
104 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_110218A 02/18/11 22:51
70 130 A
Run: ICPMS2-C_110218A 02/18/11 22 :55
70 130 0.1 20 A
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 34 of 44
EN:RGY
..... 1)' "'>I l" 1'_' /' _ "
www.energylab.com
AMIyIkttI EIuIIe&. SIru 1151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-672-1225 • College Station, IX 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: E200.8
Result
Sample 10: LRB 18 Method Blank
Arsenic 0.0002
Beryllium 0.00010
Cadmium 6E-05
Chromium NO
Cobalt NO
Copper NO
Lead NO
Manganese NO
Mercury NO
Molybdenum NO
Nickel NO
Selenium 0.0009
Silver NO
Thallium NO
Tin NO
Uranium NO
Vanadium NO
Zinc NO
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Sample 10: LFB 18 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Arsenic 0.0536 mg/L
Beryllium 0.0542 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0543 mg/L
Chromium 0.0553 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0555 mg/L
Copper 0.0532 mg/L
Lead 0.0554 mg/L
Manganese 0.0552 mg/L
Mercury 0.00548 mg/L
Molybdenum 0.0541 mg/L
Nickel 0.0532 mg/L
Selenium 0.0537 mg/L
Silver 0.0198 mg/L
Thallium 0.0548 mg/L
Tin 0.0544 mg/L
Uranium 0.0541 mg/L
Vanadium 0.0548 mg/L
Zinc 0.0549 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020544-002BMS4 18 Sample Matrix Spike
Arsenic 0.0541 mg/L
Beryllium 0.0436 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0492 mg/L
Chromium 0.0550 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0546 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: C11020544
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
6E-05
3E-05
1E-05
4E-05
2E-05
7E-05
3E-05
5E-05
8E-05
5E-05
0.0007
0.0002
3E-05
1E-05
6E-05
1E-05
3E-05
0.0003
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.0010
0.0010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
107
108
108
111
111
106
111
110
110
108
106
106
99
110
109
108
109
110
107
87
96
108
100
Run: ICPMS2-C_110222A
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0222A
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0222A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Batch: R142961
02/22/11 14:05
02/22/11 14:12
02/23/11 02:26
Page 35 of 44
EI\ERGY '1 .. (Jjl.',lt.I-,i1 "
www.entrgylab.com
AM/yIkM~SIIru ,m Helena, JIlT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 188-&72-1225 • College Slation, TJ( 881-&90-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count
Method: E200.8
Result Units
Sample 10: C11020544-002BMS4 18 Sample Matrix Spike
Copper 0.0524 mg/L
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
0.0537 mg/L
0.215
0.00534
0.0552
0.0632
0.0945
0.0138
0.0550
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.0505 mg/L
0.0761 mg/L
0.0555 mg/L
0.121 mg/L
Sample 10: C11020544-002BMSO 18 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Arsenic 0.0522 mg/L
Beryllium 0.0439 mg/L
Cadmium 0.0479 mg/L
Chromium 0.0509 mg/L
Cobalt 0.0509 mg/L
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Sample 10: C11020544-014BMS4
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
0.0502 mg/L
0.0530 mg/L
0.200 mg/L
0.00520 mglL
0.0521 mg/L
0.0612 mg/L
0.0923 mg/L
0.0140 mg/L
0.0547 mg/L
0.0494 mg/L
0.0738 mg/L
0.0517 mg/L
0.116 mg/L
18 Sample Matrix Spike
0.0529 mg/L
0.0508 mg/L
0.0510 mg/L
0.0494 mg/L
0.0497 mg/L
0.0516 mg/L
0.0521 mg/L
0.0514 mg/L
0.00525 mglL
0.0456 mg/L
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: C11020544
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.050
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.050
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
0.00030
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.010
0.0010
0.0010
Run: ICPMS2-C_l1 0222A
96 70 130
107
130
107
110
97
108
69
107
101
117
110
95
103
87
94
100
93
92
106
100
104
104
93
104
70
107
99
113
102
84
105
102
102
99
98
103
104
99
105
91
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll 0222A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
Run: ICPMS2-C_l1 0222A
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
3.4
0.7
2.6
7.8
6.9
4.1
1.3
7.0
2.6
5.7
3.3
2.3
1.4
0.7
2.1
3.1
7.1
4.5
Batch: R142961
02/23/11 02:26
S
02/23/11 02:33
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
02/23/11 05 :50
Page 36 of 44
EN:RGY
/\ I )! ~;~ i '_.l-II •• >
www.energylab.com
AaI!fkIII EIcdIIa SIIIu 1m
Helena, flIT 877-472-0711 • Billings, flIT 800·735-4488 • Casper, WY 8 .... 235-D515
Gillette, WY 88S·I86· 7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672·1225 • College Station, TX 88"'SBD-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/24/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020544
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: E200.8 Batch: R142961
Sample 10: C11020544·014BMS4 18 Sample Matrix Spike Run: ICPMS2-C_"0222A 02/23/11 05:50
Nickel 0.0517 mg/L 0.050 103 70 130
Selenium 0.0522 mg/L 0.0010 104 70 130
Silver 0.0166 mg/L 0.010 83 70 130
Thallium 0.0500 mg/L 0.0010 100 70 130
Tin 0.0420 mg/L 0.0010 84 70 130
Uranium 0.0500 mg/L 0.00030 100 70 130
Vanadium 0.0505 mg/L 0.0010 101 70 130
Zinc 0.0546 mg/L 0.010 104 70 130
Sample 10: C11020544·014BMSO 18 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: ICPMS2-C_"0222A 02/23/11 05:57
Arsenic 0.0529 mg/L 0.0010 105 70 130 0.0 20
Beryllium 0.0512 mg/L 0.010 102 70 130 0.6 20
Cadmium 0.0512 mg/L 0.010 102 70 130 0.4 20
Chromium 0.0495 mg/L 0.0010 99 70 130 0.3 20
Cobalt 0.0492 mg/L 0.010 97 70 130 1.0 20
Copper 0.0506 mg/L 0.010 101 70 130 2.0 20
Lead 0.0520 mg/L 0.050 104 70 130 0.2 20
Manganese 0.0514 mg/L 0.010 99 70 130 0.0 20
Mercury 0.00521 mg/L 0.0010 104 70 130 0.7 20
Molybdenum 0.0469 mg/L 0.0010 94 70 130 2.7 20
Nickel 0.0515 mg/L 0.050 103 70 130 0.4 20
Selenium 0.0522 mg/L 0.0010 104 70 130 0.0 20
Silver 0.0172 mg/L 0.010 86 70 130 3.9 20
Thallium 0.0500 mg/L 0.0010 100 70 130 0.0 20
Tin 0.0435 mg/L 0.0010 87 70 130 3.4 20
Uranium 0.0500 mg/L 0.00030 100 70 130 0.1 20
Vanadium 0.0508 mg/L 0.0010 101 70 130 0.5 20
Zinc 0.0532 mg/L 0.010 102 70 130 2.6 20
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 37 of 44
EI\ERGY
.,\!,r 'I :,.! II:,"..J
www.energylab.com
IM/ftat E.ratIIIaI Sitru 'IU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillette, WY 88&-188-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 • CDllege Station, 1X 888-&80-221 B
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK-1
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: LCS-2
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11020544-0140MS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11020544-0140MSO
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mglL
Laboratory Control Sample
2.34 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
2.18 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
2.15 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO
Run: TECHNICON_110223A
0.06
Run: TECHNICON_110223A
0.10 94 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0223A
0.10 102 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0223A
0.10 101 90 110 1.4
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
03/24/11
C11020544
RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R143012
02/23/11 12:07
02123/11 12:09
02123/11 13:02
02/23/11 13:04
10
Page 38 of 44
EN:RGY
,., '1 1,\ I LJI-JII '.
www.energylab.com
AM/ffIcII ~ SIIIu IISI
Helene, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735-4481 • Casper, WY 818-235-D515
Gillette, WY 881-188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 188·672·1225 • College Station, lX 888-6111-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E900.l
Sample 10: MB·GA·0399
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Sample 10: LCS·GA·0399
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: Cl1020544·001AMS
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Sample 10: Cll 020544-001 AMSO
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
-0.08 pCi/L
0.06 pCilL
0.1 pCilL
Laboratory Control Sample
11.1 pCilL
Sample Matrix Spike
22.3 pCilL
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
20.8 pC ilL
Report Date: 03/24/11
Work Order: Cll020544
RL %REC Low Limit High limit
Run: G542M_110223B
Run: G542M_ll0223B
106 70 130
Run: G542M_l10223B
100 70 130
Run: G542M_110223B
93 70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLlmlt Qual
7.2
Batch: GA-0399
03/02111 18:26
U
03/02/11 18:26
03/02/11 18:26
03/02/11 18:26
16.5
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 39 of 44
EN:RGY
,,\ \ ':J I ~ I' t <-~ I {I_ '.
www.energylab.com
~~smc.'15Z
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, W'f 888-235-0515
Gillette, W'f 868-686-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Sialion, TX 888-&80-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/24/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020544
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R143126
Sample 10: 2S-Feb-11_LCS3 16 Laboratory Control Sample Run: 5975VOC1_110225B 02/25/11 15:01
Acetone 89 ug/L 20 89 70 130
Benzene 12 ug/L 1.0 123 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 11 ug/L 1.0 108 70 130
Chloroform 10 ug/L 1.0 104 70 130
Chloromethane 11 ug/L 1.0 108 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 21 ug/L 1.0 106 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 90 ug/L 20 90 70 130
Methylene chloride 9.6 ug/L 1.0 96 70 130
Naphthalene 10 ug/L 1.0 100 70 130
o-Xylene 10 ug/L 1.0 105 70 130
Toluene 11 ug/L 1.0 110 70 130
Xylenes, Total 32 ug/L 1.0 106 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 fo 94 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 90 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 98 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 92 80 120
Sample 10: 2S-Feb-11_MBLK_6 16 Method Blank Run: 5975VOC1 _110225B 02/25/11 16:12
Acetone ND ug/L 20
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1.0
Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane ND ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 20
Methylene chloride ND ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene ND ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 108 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 99 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 106 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 83 80 120
Sample 10: C11020S40-01SCMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5975VOC1 -110225B 02/25/11 21 :32
Acetone 110000 ug/L 20000 112 70 130
Benzene 13000 ug/L 1000 127 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 12000 ug/L 1000 122 70 130
Chloroform 18000 ug/L 1000 127 70 130
Chloromethane 12000 ug/L 1000 117 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 21000 ug/L 1000 106 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 110000 ug/L 20000 114 70 130
Methylene chloride 11000 ug/L 1000 108 70 130
Naphthalene 9400 ug/L 1000 94 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 40 of 44
EN:RGY
,,\ JI .. ,.I-j{1 ".
www.energylab.com
AMIytJm~s.u llU
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 -Billings, MT 800·735·4481 -Casper, WY 888·235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&·188·7175 -Rapid City, so 888·672·1225 -College Station, IX 888-680·2218
OA/oe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 03/24/11
Project: 1 st Quarter Groundwater 2011 Work Order: C11020544
Ana lyle Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R143126
Sample 10: C11020540·015CMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5975VOC1_11 0225B 02125/11 21 :32
o-Xylene 11000 ug/L 1000 106 70 130
Toluene 11000 ug/L 1000 109 70 130
Xylenes, Total 32000 ug/L 1000 106 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 97 BO 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 104 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 97 BO 120
Surr: Toluene-dB 1.0 93 BO 120
Sample 10: C11020540·015CMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5975VOC1 _110225B 02/25/11 22:0B
Acetone 110000 ug/L 20000 114 70 130 1.1 20
Benzene 12000 ug/L 1000 124 70 130 1.9 20
Carbon tetrachloride 12000 ug/L 1000 115 70 130 5.7 20
Chloroform 17000 ug/L 1000 11B 70 130 5.1 20
Chloromethane 12000 ug/L 1000 115 70 130 1.7 20
m+p-Xylenes 21000 ug/L 1000 103 70 130 2.9 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 120000 ug/L 20000 120 70 130 4.4 20
Methylene chloride 11000 ug/L 1000 106 70 130 1.9 20
Naphthalene 11000 ug/L 1000 112 70 130 1B 20
o-Xylene 10000 ug/L 1000 103 70 130 2.7 20
Toluene 11000 ug/L 1000 107 70 130 1.B 20
Xylenes, Total 31000 ug/L 1000 103 70 130 2.B 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 99 BO 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 102 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 100 BO 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-dB 1.0 92 BO 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 41 of 44
EN:RGY
I • 'ul ,\!'. 1<11 .....
www.energylab.com
AIII/fIIaI buI/eIa J'/la 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Cuper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 188-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 818-872-1225 • College Station, IX 811-681-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
I ~II~ II~ IIII~ IIIIII~ 111111111111111 ~IIIIII
C11020544
Login completed by: Edith McPike
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 2/23/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper containerlbottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water-pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes III
Yes III
Yes D
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
Yes 0
Yes III
Yes III
Yes III
2"C On Ice
Yes III
Yes 0
Date Received: 2/18/2011
Received by: ha
Carrier name: FedEx
No D
No D
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present III
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable 0
Page 42 of 44
"'0 Q)
to CD
.j:>.
VJ o -.j:>.
.j:>.
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record page_'_of ~ lugrr-e-y
&!IZ-ZIIU-mg, PLEASE PRINT iProvlde as much information as po.ssible.)
Company Name: M;n~). Project Name, PWS. Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPA/State Compliance: De.,,;.so,", I!:.I Q"'CAr+~·r G-rGIJ.(\v\ Wlk +~r ;tc II State: lAI Yes Er No 0
Report Mail Address: f'o Bu){ ~CA Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~ \ Cl.t\~', ~ ~\ KLlbH ~~"(\ ?"'"' r'Y' e,l Y3~ b78'.;2221 "";"I1t'.f'" Hcll,dqt-
Invoice Address: Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
~1I\.rY\-C ~o.fV'-('
Special ReporVFormats: 15 [W!l&11S7@D@ [rum:®QJJ~'D'rn[ID ... Contact Ell prior to ~~ iii RUSH sample submittal
~o ",L: I=" for charges and Cooler 10(s):
~a:l;gOI (j; 0 ~ R scheduling -See c.~ ._> 0 >-ro ~ o OW 0 EOD/EOT(Electronic Data) ~(f)~l)l5: () W Instruction Page
03:=a ~ C7) 3" I -0 ReCVI lit T em II o POTWIWWTP Format: U ot: ~ .:5 (J t: Comments: ...... <C (/)1001:;;;;: :::::J U 1. o State: 0 LEVEL IV
o ~ t: -~ ~ e °c r.... o;~ C·i:: ~~ \l co ~~12° ... ~~ ~ c: o Other: 0 NELAC -"-On Ice: GN EI-~ ~ <t: Q,I ~ « :::::J
::J 11).= Q) ~ 'c -::j f-5 z Ci<Cllir° ~ ... 'G ~ q} r w 'E Custody Seal lij >1 · ::1 V ,/) 'l:; ~ ~ W I'D On Bottle Y N J~ ..tl .~ :s rJ) -0 (!)N (/) . -1"" ~ ::t 1/ . -c: On Cooler
0 .:J
I\J 1!! ~ d .... :1 ~ (/) H Intact C 'N SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection ~ Vl u: J'l a ~ (Name, Location, Interval. etc.) Date Time MATRIX r Signature C\N Match
1 l-w )iw :l ;;).. .. ,1.\.).tJ \ \ 0<.(1.\0 x. ~.
2 MvJ '3 ~-p;.~01\ rc3:, ~-W " -;... ~
3 Mw '3A :;l.-\6,~O I\ 1CC"-l 'J--vJ J.. 1-~ IQ)
nnn
4 }!vJ ~ i2.-\I.\-::tell 13:l.0 1-vJ 'r.. m
5 Mw I~ Q..-)1:)·~Oil tl1.50 I-w 1-~
6 "" W ) ~ IY'1C :).-vJ Ii '" 1)( ~ 'l-\~_)..O\I
7 MW;2$ ~.lLj -:lDtl IId.Cl \-w 'A l?5! ~
e J!..W '}...O k;l-lb -,g.o II ICI1~ b-W /<-~ 0
9 MW~b ~-1G.-~\;)\1 l.l~~ b-W )<. ~~
10 Mw 3Y "-1 ~ -:;2.u 1\ OK30 b-vJ x 1. 'fI/J~A5~'-I
Custody RelinqUIShed by (print): OatelTlme: -f!laY7:/ RecclVed by (print): Oatefrrme. SIgnature:
Record rrQ..t'I~p(· ~Ir\lll'" ~Ii /."'01 I I \~ .::JtlANA.' A
RelinquiShed by (print)() Oal.efTimo: Signature: --;;;:;;:] Received by (pnnt). DatefTim&; Signature:
MUST be
Signed R_vei:lby LabOr.IIlory: i SleJ ,n-'\l ~ ~;ec~ Sample Dlsoosal: Return to Client: lab Disposal: ·l~,: W
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy Laboratories. Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.energylab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms. and links.
"U III (C
CD
.j:>.
.j:>.
o -.j:>.
.j:>.
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record . ' Page ~ of~ ,ql(f(e-y
MMr:t.fiz ••• Ji»a. --.. -.......... . ._-------------.... _ .... _ .. _ .. --"' .. __ ._._.,
Company Name: jvt;ne..~ Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. I Sample Origin EPNState Compliance:
I De.f1 l,Sen p.T QUoHt-e. C-r-O\A.l'\J. ~e..te.r ~CII I State: ~ Yes Er No 0
Report Mail Address: Pc ~O)! 8'o~ Contact Name: Phone/Fax: Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~ '~nJ-; nu., v-'T g ~\f. it \<.~c-..~ PGl.i(n~f '-i3'S b 7'6 .;l..~-;:t. \ J:"1'\r1~'-J+,di ,'jlj-Y
Invoice Address: ......., Invoice Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order:
SJ..\"'\<' ~""<
Special ReporVFormats: s: ~W®D@ OO~®(!D~@:@ .. Contact ELI prior to ~~ 0 Q) RUSH sample submittal
~o U),C for charges and Cooler ID(s):
:gcogOI Q)
() Cl !;t R scheduling -See ~ --> 0 >.11; UJ t:. Instruction Page
DDW D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) fI(I) en o:! s: ::r I:: <;, U) :::I: 0s:= ~ C) -3 "0 ReceiptTemp
D POTWNVWTP () I:: Comments: Format: u 00<= :::J U _<cenlliSl~ 0 <t: 0 "L D State: o LEVEL IV ° ~ c: ~ °c •• Q) c: .~ I-m o Other: D NELAC ~ ~1ti.QO # l-t:
Q)N ~11ti ' <t: 5 On Ice:
:::J 0).':= (D s: .~ ~ l-S zo.<ClljllO 4J W "0 Custody Seal E >1 ~ UJ ~
c$ !II On Bottle Y N <tI V) en "0 (I) 5 =; I:: ~-ff: 0 ? -::r [} ,g H Intact N en SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX Jl r Signature ,-~ N
(Name, Location. Interval. etc.) Date Time Match ,
/'J.VJ ~S ~'l S ~).C-1\ );1..,-\u 6-W 'f ~
2 Mw Ie ~-1!:,-;l.O'1 l,-\"-\C t~-\J 'f.. 'I--..,.. ~
3 M~v be. '?'-Ib -JoG 11 \"3CO 6-W X ~ !nn~
4 J'.-\ \~ ~SR ~-\L1.?'.cl) c~c ~-vJ y.. ~
5 -r;.~ B\Ar\k ~1. d--\'-\-;101\
= ~
6 -r~-D ~'\c'u\,<-~
7 , , Ie ~
8 ~ 0
9 a'il ~ .,1
10 ~~~t1Sf/tr
Custody Relinquished by (pri;l OatolTme: _ -...A I\J\I .'( S\gl1')I:.L./t
Recewed by (prtri); Oalamme' Sillnalum: l---r:tlfIff Holl' la :l1l1/;:!.O11 1I'3.£) Record Relinquished by (print): 0 Oatel1ime: Signature: Received by (print): DatelT1me: Signature:
MUST be
Signed ftecel""a DyL:ii"l)orawry: 1.'~ ~-{ l "10 .\.. .. r~e.'i l.1V'-SamQle Disposal: Return to Client: Lao Disposal:
In certain circumstances, samples suomitted to Energy Laooratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www_energylab.com for addilional information, downloadable fee schedule, forms, and links.
TabF
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
TabFl
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
January 2011
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Denison Mines
Project: January Monthly
Lab Sample ID: l101179-00lA
Client Sample ID: MW-11
Collection Date: 111112011 1200h
Received Date: 1113/2011 1010h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 1/17/20112034h
Units: Ilg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-BroD1ofluorobenzene
Surr: DibroD1ofluoroD1ethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Metbod: SW8260C
VOAs by GCIMS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 106
460-00-4 80-123 104
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 100
Report Date: 1120/2011 Page 4 of1S
All analyses applicable to the CW A. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertinenl sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of lhe
addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of lhe name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisementl promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connectlon
with the ,,::public~lion.of th~s .report. for a~y pUl],OS. olher than for the addressee will be granled only on contac!. This company aceepls no responsibility excepl for the due performance of inspeclion andlor analysis in good faith
EN:RGY .'
1\1 !On AI OHIt s
www.energylab.com
~ Exu/Ifta SIIIu 1151
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 -Billings, MT BOD-735-4481 -Casper, WY BB8-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&-&86-7175 -Rapid Ci1y, SD 188-672-1225 -Collage Station, 1X 888-610-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
January Monthly Groundwater
C11 01 0389-001
Client Sample 10: MW 11
Analyses Result Units
METALS -DISSOLVED
Manganese
Report
Definitions:
Al -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
121 ug/L
Qualifiers RL
10
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/11/11 12:00
DateReceived: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E200.8 01/20/1118:10/sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 18
EI\ERGY
,_I\L!On .. '\.1 CIHl~'
www.energylab.com
AMIyIIaf~sr.u 1m
Halens, MT 877-472-0111 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Glllatta, WY 886-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • Collage Station, 1X 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
January Monthly Groundwater
C11 01 0389-004
Client Sample ID: MW 25
Analyses
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
7.02 ug/l
Qualifiers RL
0.30
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/11/11 12:30
DateReceived: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date / By
E200.B 01/21/11 23 :30/ sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 18
EN:RGY
. /'101 '.o.~'\r(")1 ~n ~.i
www.energyiab.com
AtuIyIkM~SIItu 1m
Helens, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOD-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-188-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-690-221 B
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: January Monthly Groundwater
LablD: C11 01 0389-002
Client Sample ID: MW 26
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1.2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
52
0.2
3100
32.0
ND
ND
ND
800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2
101
104
101
100
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/12/11 09:50
DateReceived: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
1 A4500-CI B 01/17/11 11 :37 IIr
0.1 E353.2 01/14/1116:36/dc
10 A2540 C 01/14/11 16 :03/1mc
0.30 E200.8 01/21/11 23:261 sml
20 SW8260B 01/15/11 03:101 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 01/15/11 03:101 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 01/15/1103:10/ilr
D 100 SW8260B 01/15/11 02:331 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 01/15/1103:101 ilr
20 SW8260B 01/15/11 03:101 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 01/15/1103:101 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 01/15/11 03:101 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 01 /15/11 03:101 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 01/15/11 03:101 ilr
80-120 SW8260B 01/15/1103:101 ilr
70-130 SW8260B 01/15/11 03:101 ilr
80-120 SW8260B 01/15/1103:10/ilr
80-120 SW8260B 01/15/1103:101 ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 4 of 18
EN:RGY
• l'llOr'tJ\rOrdl ~j
www.energylab.com
Atul/bIEmn.u:.SIIIu rm
Helena, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 . Casper, WY 888·235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&·888·7175 . Rapid City, SO 188·&72·1225 • Collage Station, TX 888·690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
January Monthly Groundwater
C11 01 0389-003
Client Sample ID: MW 30
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
METALS· DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
15
36.2
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/L
ug/L
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/10/1112:10
DateRecelved: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifiers RL QCL Method Analysis Date I By
D E353.2 01/14/11 16:381 dc
5.0 E200.8 01/20/11 18:151 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 5 of 18
I l
EI'ERGY
~J\.l~OB/\ICI~lr ~
www.energylab.com
~EmItfta SIIIu '151 Holena, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT BGO·735·4481 • Cosper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 8&6-188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • CDllege StatiDn,lX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
January Monthly Groundwater
Cll 01 0389-005
Client Sample ID: MW 31
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result
19
1240
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/l
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/10/11 14:30
DateReceived: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCll
Qualifiers Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D E353.2 01/14/11 16:481 dc
10 A2540 C 01/14/11 16:04/1mc
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 18
EN:RGY
~ IFlonJ\fCr·HL!..)
www.anergylab.com
W/yIIQ/ EluIlMluSblc.,W
Helena, MT 877·472·0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 . Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WY 866·8B6· 7175 • Rapid City, SD 88B·672·1225 • Collage Station, TX 888·690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
January Monthly Groundwater
C11 01 0389-006
Client Sample ID: MW 65
Analyses
METALS· DISSOLVED
Uranium
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
6.94 ug/L
Qualifiers RL
0.30
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/11/11 12:30
DateRecelved: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.B 01/21 /11 23:351 sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 8 of 18
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
January Monthly
1101179-002A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 111112011
Received Date: 1113/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 1117/2011 2053h
Units: ~gIL
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1010h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GCIMS Method 8260CI5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 107
460-00-4 80-123 104
1868-53-7 80-124 101
2037-26-5 80-125 99.4
Report Date: 1/20/2011 Page 5 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CW A, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in Dccordsnce to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sDmpling information is located on tbe atlached CDC. Tbis report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this reporl in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
wit.h thc r~:public~tion .of th!s .report. for a?y pu'!'osc other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company sccepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor anaJysis in good faith
EN:RGY .~
~;'\BO~ll\l OHIl OJ
www.energylab.com
AMIytIaI EluIftn ShIu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 80D-735-4489 • CBsper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 886-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 818-&72-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
January Monthly Groundwater
C11 01 0389-007
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank 5515
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
100
87.0
98.0
94.0
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Qualifiers RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
80-120
70-130
80-120
80-120
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/12/11
DateReceived: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
SW8260B 01/14/1113:18/ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/1113:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/1113:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
SW8260B 01/14/11 13:181 ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 18
EN:RGY
, I\l.lonl\l Of~1l ~
www.energylab.com
AIII/yIIaI £IuIIIIJI:I SJ/tu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 88B-235-D515
Gilletta, WY 886-186-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • CO/laga Station, lX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
January Monthly Groundwater
C11 01 0389-008
Client Sample ID: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Temperature
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
Result Units
3.0
Qualifiers RL
Report Date: 02/01/11
Collection Date: 01/12/11
DateRecelved: 01/13/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
QCL Method Analysis Date 1 By
E170.1 01/13/11 09:151 kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 18
A Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
AMERICAN Denver, CO 80265
WEST TEL: [phone]
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RE: January Monthly
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1101179
American West Analytical Laboratories received 2 sample(s) on 1/13/2011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado and Idaho. Certification
document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this
report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitaion limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
Thank You,
Approved by:
Digitally signed by Jose G.
J 0 5 e G ~~~~~=Jose G. Rocha,
• o=American West Analytical
Laboratories. ou=Quality
Assurance Officer, Roc h a ~~~~=[e-mail],
Date: 2011.01.20 17:23:02
-07'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 1120/20 II Page 1 of 15
All analyses applicable La the CW A. SDWA. and RCM arc perfonned in accordance Lo NELAC protocols. Peninent sampling infoon.Lion is located on the .L!ached CDC. This repon is providcd for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequcnl use of the name of lhis company or any member of ils slafT, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any producl or process, or in connection
wit.h the r~:public~tion .ofth~s.report. for ~y pu~ose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibilily except for the due perfonnancc ofinspeclion andlor analysis in good failh
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1l01179-001A
11 01179-002A
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Denison Mines
January Monthly
1101179
111312011 1010h
Client Sample ID
MW-11
Trip Blank
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Date Collected Matrix Analysis
111112011 1200h Aqueous VOA by GCfMS Method
111112011
8260C/5030C
Aqueous VOA by GCIMS Method
8260C/5030C
Report Date: 1/20/2011 Page 2 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are pcrfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached CDC. This report is providcd for the «clusive use of the
addressee. Privileges ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its starr, OT reproduction orwis report in connection with the advertisement. promotion or sale arany product or process, or in connection
wil.h the r,:~public~tion _ofth~s.report. for a~y puryose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contacl. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of ins peeL ion and/or analysis in goad faith
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
January Monthly
1101179
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
1113/2011
111112011
Intact
None
SW-8468260CIS030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MBs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 1/20/2011 Page 3 of 15
All .nalyscs applicablc to Ibe CW 1\, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance La NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on Lhe attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
wit.h the r~:public~tion .of lh~s ,report. for a~y _puI)l0se other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1101179
Project: January Monthly
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 011711B Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 011711B Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
LCS VOC 01171lB Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 011711B Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 011711B Surr: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: awal@awal·labs,com, web: .WWW.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QCType: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
J.lg/L SW8260C 21.9 20.00 0 109 43-146
%REC SW8260C 53.0 50.00 106 69-132
%REC SW8260C 49,6 50.00 99.2 85-118
%REC SW8260C 51.5 50.00 103 80-120
%REC SW8260C 49.4 50.00 98.8 81-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QAOfficer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
1117/2011 1937h
1117/2011 1937h
1117/2011 1937h
1117/2011 1937h
1/17/2011 1937b
Report Date: 112012011 Page 6 of15
An analyses applicable to the CWA, SOW A. and RCRA are pcrfonncd in accordance 10 NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advcrtiscmcDl, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the Tc-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addrcssce wilL be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 11 0 1179
Project: January Monthly
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 011711B Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 011711B Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 011711B Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
MBVOC01171lB Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MBVOC01171lB Surr: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Units
IlgiL
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Salt Lake City, vr 84115
[phone], Toll Frcc [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MBLK
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount Original
Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
SW8260C < 1.00
SW8260C 53.5 50.00 107 69-132
SW8260C 51.8 50.00 104 85-118
SW8260C 50.5 50.00 101 80-120
SW8260C 49.8 50.00 99.6 81-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
1/1712011 2015h
1117/2011 2015h
1117/2011 2015h
1117/2011 2015h
1117/2011 2015h
Report Date: 112012011 Page 7 of15
An analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA ar~ performed in accordance to NELAe protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached CDC. This report is provided for the exclusive usc ofthc addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this repon for any purpose other than for the addressee will bc granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or anwysis in good
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 11 0 1179
Project: January Monthly
Sample ID Analyte
l101179-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
1101179-001AMS SUIT: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1 10 1179-001AMS Surr: 4-Bromotluorobenzene
1101179-001AMS Surr: Dibromotluoromethane
l101179-001AMS Surr: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone]. Toll Free [phone]. Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awal-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
I1g/L SW8260C 22-4 20.00 0 112 43-146
%REC SW8260C 53-4 50.00 107 77-144
%REC SW8260C 49.7 50_00 99-4 80-123
%REC SW8260C 50.8 50_00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 48.5 50.00 96.9 80-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
111712011 2112h
1117/2011 2112h
1117/2011 2112h
1117/2011 2112h
1117/2011 2112h
Report Date: 1120/2011 Page 8 of 15
AU analyses applicable to the CW A, SDW A, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purposc ather than for thc addressee win be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1101179
Project: January Monthly
Sample ID Analyte
1101179-00lAMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1101179-001AMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1101179-001AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1101179-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1101179-001AMSD Surr: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone]. Toll Frce [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]. web: www.awal-Iabs.com
C SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
J.lg/L SW8260C 21.9 20.00 0 109 43-146
%REC SW8260C 53.4 50.00 107 77-144
%REC SW8260C 49.6 50.00 99.3 80-123
%REC SW8260C 51.1 50.00 102 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.2 50.00 98.4 80-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual
2.53 25
Date Analyzed
111712011 2131h
1117/2011 2131h
1117/2011 2131h
1117/2011 2131h
1117/2011 2131h
Report Date: 1120/2011 Page 9 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA. are performed in accordance to NELAe protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC, This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent usc of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale afany product or process, or in connection with the rc-publication of this report for lUly purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no rcsponsibility cxcept for the due pcrfonnancc of inspection and/or analysis in good
Data Pa th
Da ta File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quanti tation Report
C:\msd e hem\1\DATA \JANll-C\17JANllA\
S52L1791.D
17 J an 2 011 8 :34 pm
11011 79-0Q1A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
6 Sample Multipli.er: 1
Quant Time : Jan 1& 07 :01 :26 2011
Quant Me thod C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHOD S\AFULLW_27 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLa st Update Mon Jan 17 10 :45 :55 2011
Response via I nitial Calibration
(QT Revie\oled )
'Abundance TIC: S52L 1791.D\dala.ms
2100000
2000000 t 2 1900000 c ~ Sl
1800000 'It .t:: 0
~ ~ !
1700000 '" I:! ~ Sl
1600000 .t:: "! .>l
~ a "-
1500000
1400000
I:! ~ ! ~ 19 .3 c g .~ e g '" Ii: t: " a <I)
1300000 \Ii
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
AFULLW_27.M Tue Jan 18 08:47:31 2011
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1 \DATA\JANI1-C\17JAN11A\
S53L1792 .D
17 Jan 2011 8:53 pm
11011 79-002A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
7 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jan 18 07 :01 :58 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_27 .M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Mon J an 17 10 :45 :55 2011
Response via I nitial Calibration
(QT Reviewed )
ndance bu
22
TIC: S53L 1792~D\data.ms
00000
21 00000
20 00000 V-
~ I!! GO
00000 i:! ~ ~ -~ Jl
00000 ~ ~ 0 ~ I/) ~
I m
t ~ 0
00000 <= ~ ~
19
18
17
~ 00000 0 E 16
2
1 '" !j 00000 " fJ) i:! 15
.B 2
00000 g
Ii: 14
~
13 00000
12 00000
11 00000
10 00000
9 00000
0000 fI) J ~ I!!
'6 2
00000 E f 2 ~ ~ 3i 0 00000 2 "" '"
80
7
6
0 !i t= " t/}
5 00000 <II
4 00000
3 00000
2 00000
00000 ~ A A • a 'T -.---r-r 2.50 3.bo ~&!Li,oo _1.50 .~ 7.QO.-1.~~.oo~· -> 2.00 5,0!L2:®J.,9Q ~"50
AFULLW_27.M Tue Jan 18 09:15:46 2011
9.bo 910 10~00 10~50 ro
11 .00 11 .50
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\I\DATA\JANII-C\17JANIIA\
S49LCS20.D
17 Jan 2011 7:37 pm
LCS VOC 011 711B
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNTS
3 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jan 17 19:49:30 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\I\METHODS\AFULLW_27.M
VOA Calibration
Mon Jan 17 10:45:55 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
fAbundance
3200000
TIC: S49LCS20.O\data.ms
3000000
::; a:
2800000 .. "C ~
2600000 " t' Q) D e ~ u i3 2400000 * ~ 0 ~ !!
2200000 " .2 f2 t: :J en
2000000
8 en 1[
" t'
1800000 Cc 1l~ ~ e" Eo ON :J"
1600000
1400000
:S~ Q)
.; E>'
f
0'<= " -1ii ~ ~E " c%~ .2l e <1 0 :J u:
0 ., ~ " ...
1200000
1000000
800000
I!!
600000 ~i
q ~, " " " .<= .Q .~ -I f£~ 400000 " 8 -
" ~ ~~ H~ '" .<= -'" ~~ 1ii ~-E ~ T"ftS4i 0 W o~ 0 E 200000 e "C N m .Q «
lme-> 8.00 8.50 9.00 ~.50 10.00 10.50 11 .00 11.50
AFULLW_27.M Tue Jan 18 08:45:12 2011 Report Date: 1/20/2ljf'\gEp'egil120f15
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JANII-C\17JANIIA\
S5ILMBLK.D
17 Jan 2011 8:15 pm
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
MB VOC 011 711B
MBLK 5. OML
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
5 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jan 18 07:00:55 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_27.M
VOA Calibration
Mon Jan 17 10:45:55 2011
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
r. bundance
2100000
TIC: S51LMBLK.D\dala.ms
2000000
1900000
1800000
1700000
1600000
1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
CIl CIl .,; .,; " iij OJ .t:: .t:: 'iii Qi E E! E! .Q 0 -5 :> '5 ~~ E E! .0 is :>
500000 ~ CIl
CIl
400000
300000
200000
100000
,,-,,-,lm,.,,9-,-,,-> __ -=2.00 2.50 7,-OJ .. 00~8.50 9.00 ~.§Q 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_27.M Tue Jan 18 08:45:44 2011 Report Date: 1I20I2ij~9%ge413 of 15
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JAN11-C\17JAN11A\
S54S1791.D
17 Jan 2011 9:12 pm
11011 79-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
8 Sample Multiplier: 1
Quant Time: Jan 17 21:24:42 2011
Quant Method C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_27.M
Quant Title VOA Calibration
QLast Update Mon Jan 17 10:45:55 2011
Response via Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
fA1)undance T1C:S54S1791.0\dala.ms
3200000
3000000
2800000
2600000
2400000
2200000
2000000
1800000
1600000
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
600000 q
:!! ~ ~ Il 400000 Ql c: '" '" Qi >. ~Qi E m 01 0
200000 E e '"
1!
Ji ~I ~ jj. I~
j(
a: ~r .. 1 ~ ..\I ~ 1
:!! 01 ~ c-
oO
E
O~~~~~~~~~+r~~~t~W+~~~L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
me-> 2.QQ ~~g 3,00 3.50 4,QO 4.50 5.00 5.,5:2 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00
AFULLW_27.M Tue Jan 18 08:46:18 2011 Report Date: 1I20/2ij~9EP"lIgJ.l14 of15
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\JANll-C\17JAN11A\
S55D1 791. D
17 Jan 2011 9:31 pm
11011 79-001AMSD
MSD 5.0ML 30F3
9 Sample Multiplier: 1
Jan 17 21:43:38 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_27.M
VOA Calibration
Man Jan 17 10:45:55 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: S55D1791 .o\data.ms
3200000
3000000
2800000
2600000
1800000
E
g-
" N c: Jll £l g u::
~
1200000
l'!.
Ii ex; Q ~I ., " i c: " i
" ~ I" ~!~
c: ~~ 51 '" ~ ~~ u~ .c 1ii £ ro~ ~ 1 E o W 00 E "0 J £l .l2 III
im~> __
AFULLW_27.M Tue Jan 18 08:46:51 2011
" <OJ a<: i ~ " ~
CD Jll ~ ~£l ~ .9!~ i~·g
'" Ef;"
~ .: fit"l. z "l '" 8
N-
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Denison Mines
Client ID: DEN100 Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Project: January Monthly QC Level:
Comments: No Hard Copies (UL). QC 3 & Summary. EDD-CSV. Report THF to 1 flg/L.;
SampleID Client Sample ID Collected Date Received Date Date Due Matrix
Work Order: 1101179
Page 1 of1
1113/2011
WOType: Project
Test Code Sel Storage
1101179-001A
1101179-002A
MW-11
Trip Blank
1/1112011 12:00:00 PM 1/13/2011 10:10:00 AM 112712011 Aqueous g260-W ~ VOCFridge
111112011 1127/2011 8260-W ~ VOCFridge
3
Sheet 1 of 1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY f(GII);
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Pro'ect Sam lers Name nature
Tanner Hollida
Date Time
SampJelO Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW 11 1/11/2011 1200 THF
Trip Blank 1/11/2011
Please notify Ryan Palmer of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediatelyl Thank you.
Relinquished By:(Signature)
::J~J.t
Relinquished By:{Signature)
DatelTime Receive By:(Signature)
1/1212011
1330
DatelTime
~JtelTime
/13 / ~I /U(
Samples Were: COC Tape Was:
~hippedBy: LA yJS Present on Outer Package
o Hand Delivered wtYes ONo ON/A
o Ambient UD~rokeD on Outer p~age
W'Chilled 'til Yes 0 No .::rtJ c
, Temperature tj.Lj °C Present on Sample
Rec. Broken/Leaking DYes ~No ON/A DYes 0 No ~N/A
Notes: Unbroken on sa~~e
DYes DNo IA
Properly Preserved ~Yes DNo DN/A Notes: I
Notes:
Rec. Within Hold ~Yes ONo
Notes: I \
Bome 1\7ne-Preservative All pHs OK
Ammonia . pH ~~ ~()
COD pH <2 H2SO4 -r---
C""y'anide PH >12 NaOH -I---
Metals pH <2 HN03 ---I--
N02 &N03 pH <2 H2SO4 --r--..
Nutrients pH <2 H2SO4 --.....-.
O&G pH<2HCL
Phenols pH <2 H2SO4
Sulfide pH> 9NaOH, ZnAC
TKN pH <2 H2S04
TOC pH <2 H3P04
TP04 pH <2 H2SO4
TPH pH <2 HCL
Procedure: Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
Lab Set ID: ! ( Q I 1/1
Container Type:
M W AL Supplied Plastic
o A ~ Supplied Clear Glass
o A WAL ~plied Amber Glass
o A WAL SUP~AlTOC/TOX Vials
o Amber 0 Clear eadspace 0 No Headspace
o Non A WAL Supplied~tainer
Notes: ~
Discrepancies Between Labels and COC
Notes:
r--... .....................
........ ...........
............
...............
~
~
~
~
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COG and notify client for further instructions
.6)
7)
Place client conversation on COG
Samples may be adjusted at client request
No. Rec.
I
DYes .t1'&o /'\
-
)
UPS Internet Shipping: Shipment Label
UPS Internet Shipping: View/Print Label
1. Print the label(s): Select the Print button on the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your
browser does not support this function select Print from the File menu to print the label.
2. Fold the printed label at the solid line below. Place the label in a UPS Shipping Pouch. If
you do not have a pouch, affix the folded label using clear plastic l:/hipping tape over the entire
label.
3. GETTING YOUR SHIPMENT TO UPS
Customers without a Daily Pickup
Schedule a same day or future day Pickup to have a UPS driver pickup all of your Internet
Shipping packages.
Hand the package to any UPS driver in your area.
Take your package to any location of The UPS Store®, UPS Drop Box, UPS Customer Center,
UPS Alliances (Office Depot® or Staples®) or Authorized Shipping Outlet near you. Items senf
via UPS Return ServicesSM (including via Ground) are also accepted at Drop Boxes.
To find the location nearest you, please visit the 'Find Locations' Quick link at ups.com.
Customers with a Daily Pickup
Your driver will pickup your shipment(s) as usual.
FOLD HERE
'.
Page 1 of 1
https://www.ups.com/uis/create?ActionOriginPair=print_Receipt&POPUP __ LEVEL=1&...111212011
EI\ERGY .'
_/\!~,,-)II/'\I Gf~IL S
www.energyfab.com
AiVIyIIaI ~ SIIa IISZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 801-735·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-18&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 818-112-1225 . College Station,IX 888-&90·2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
February 01, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11 01 0389 Quote ID: C1640 -POC Wells
Project Name: January Monthly Groundwater
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 8 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 1/13/2011 for analysis.
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11 01 0389-001 MW 11 . 01/11/11 12:0001/13/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11 01 0389-002 MW 26 01/12/11 09:50 01/13/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11 01 0389-003 MW 30 01/10/11 12:1001/13/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C11 01 0389-004 MW 25 01 Iii Iii 12 :30 01/13/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11 01 0389-005 MW 31 01/10/1114:3001/13/11 Aqueous Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
C11 01 0389-006 MW 65 01/11/1112:3001/13/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11 01 0389-007 Trip Blank 5515 01/12/11 00:00 01/13/11 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11 01 0389-008 Temp Blank 01/12/1100:0001/13/11 Aqueous Temperature
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601 . Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By: c3¥~ cD u)c.l~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011 .02.01 14:30:36 -07:00
Page 1 of 18
www.energylab.com
AM/ytkIII~s.u '152 Halena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 . Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette WY 866-186-7175 • Ra Id GI SD 888-672-1225 • Colle e Slation lX 888-690-2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: January Monthly Groundwater Report Date: 02/01/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11 01 0389 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITIAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are hand
delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are NO (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SO
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportun ity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 18
EN:RGY
. /\H()fU\I GI"IL~;
www.enelgylab.com
AIu/fIkII£xu~~'m
Helena, tIT 877-472-0711 • BillinRs, tIT 800-739-44B8 • Casper, WY B88-235-D515
Gillette, WY B&&-I86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1229 • ColieRe Station, 1X 888-&80-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: January Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLK1_
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS1_ Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 977 mg/L
Sample 10: C11010433-001AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 2200 mg/L
Sample 10: C11010444-008AOUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 3780 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Report Date: 02/01/11
Work Order: C11010389
RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R141971
Run: BAL-1 _110114A 01/14/11 16:03
10
Run: BAL-1 _110114A 01/14/11 16:03
10 98 90 110
Run: BAL-1 110114A 01/14/11 16:06 -
10 102 90 110
Run: BAL-1 110114A 01/14/11 16:08 -
10 0.1 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 11 of 18
EN:RGY
1\·1C.)f'J·"Lr-ll~ ~~
www.energylab.com
AMIytIuI EiullMlCI SlIIU tm
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 816-888-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-812-1225 . College Station, 1X 888-880-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: January Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-110117
Chloride
Sample 10: C10120868-001AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C10120868-001AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-110117
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
46.8 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
46.5 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3510 mg/L
Report Date: 02/01/11
Work Order: C11 01 0389
RL %REC Low limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Batch: 110117-CL-TTR-W
Run :TITRATION_110117A 01 /17/1111:18
0.5
Run: TITRATION_110117A
1.0 101 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110117A
1.0 100 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110117A
1.0 99 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
0.8
01/17/1112:11
01/17/1112:13
10
01/17/11 12:22
Page 12 of 18
EN:RGY
1\11 lIUd UH1~ ~
www.energylab.com
AMIytIaI~smu /1151
Helena, lIfT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Caspar, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 1188-&72-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: January Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB 2 Method Blank
Manganese ND mg/L
Selenium 0.0002 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB 2 Laboratory Fortified Blank
Manganese 0.0519 mg/L
Selenium 0.0537 mg/L
Sample 10: C11010463-001AMS4 2 Sample Matrix Spike
Manganese 0.0475 mg/L
Selenium 0.0526 mg/L
Sample 10: C11010463-001AMSO 2 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Manganese 0.0494 mg/L
Selenium 0.0583 mg/L
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank
Uranium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank
Uranium 0.0546 mg/L
Sample 10: C11010389-006AMS4 Sample Matrix Spike
Uranium 0.0645 mg/L
Sample 10: C11 01 0389-006AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Uranium 0.0690 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
RL
5E-05
0.0002
0.0010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
0.010
0.0010
1E-05
0.00030
0.00030
0.00030
Report Date: 02/01/11
Work Order: C 11010389
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLImit Qual
Batch: R142012
Run: ICPMS2-C_110120A 01/20/11 11 :38
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0120A 01/20/11 11 :43
104 85 115
107 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0120A 01/20/11 17:54
90 70 130
94 70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0120A 01/20/11 17:59
94 70 130 4.0 20
105 70 130 10 20
Batch: R142056
Run: ICPMS2-C_110121A 01/21/1111:13
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0121 A 01/21/1111:17
109 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_110121A 01/21/11 23:39
115 70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0121 A 01/21/1123:43
124 70 130 6.6 20
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 18
EN:RGY
,\t ..... )1 ./. r 01 ~rt.. ~~
www.energylab.com
AMfTtIClI UClu.n" SIn" '1$1
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-&8&-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, TJ( 888-680-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 02/01 /11
Project: January Monthly Groundwater Work Order: C11 01 0389 ----
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Method: E353.2 Batch: R141865
Sample 10: MBLK-1 Method 81ank Run : TECHNICON_11 01148 01 /14/11 16:23
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N ND mg/L 0.04
Sample 10: LCS-2 Laboratory Control Sample Run : TECHNICON_11 01148 01/14/11 16:26
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.28 mg/L 0.10 91 90 110
Sample 10: C11010389-002CMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: TECHNICON_11 01148 01 /14/1116:41
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.20 mg/L 0.10 98 90 110
Sample 10: C11010389-002CMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: TECHNICON_110114B 01/14/11 16:43
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N 2.19 mg/L 0.10 97 90 110 0.5 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 14 of 18
EN:RGY
, '-.' r ~ " I ( I {[
www.energylab.com
AMIytkM Exuu.n&. smc. IW
Helena, MT 877 -4 72-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&6-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-612-1225 • College Station, 1X 888-690-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: January Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: SW8260B
Sample 10: 011411_LCS3 16 Laboratory Control Sample
Acetone 77 ug/L
Benzene 9.7 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 9.2 ug/L
Chloroform 9.4 ug/L
Chloromethane 9.1 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 21 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 84 ug/L
Methylene chloride 10 ug/L
Naphthalene 9.5 ug/L
o-Xylene 10 ug/L
Toluene 9.6 ug/L
Xylenes, Total 31 ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: 01141CMBLK_6 16 Method Blank
Acetone NO ug/L
Benzene NO ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L
Chloroform NO ug/L
Chloromethane NO ug/L
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L
Methylene chloride NO ug/L
Naphthalene NO ug/L
o-Xylene NO ug/L
Toluene NO ug/L
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Sample 10: C11 01 0404-013AMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike
Acetone 880 ug/L
Benzene 100 ug/L
Carbon tetrachloride 99 ug/L
Chloroform 100 ug/L
Chloromethane 92 ug/L
m+p-Xylenes 220 ug/L
Methyl ethyl ketone 900 ug/L
Methylene chloride 100 ug/L
Naphthalene 110 ug/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
RL
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
20
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
200
10
10
10
10
10
200
10
10
Report Date: 02/01/11
Work Order: C11 01 0389
%REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R141871
Run: SATURNCA_110114A 01/14/11 10:53
77 70 130
97 70 130
92 70 130
94 70 130
91 70 130
105 70 130
84 70 130
100 70 130
95 70 130
100 70 130
96 70 130
104 70 130
97 80 120
86 70 130
101 80 130
100 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_11 0114A 01/14/11 12:06
97 80 120
87 70 130
101 80 120
94 80 120
Run: SATURNCA_110114A 01/14/11 18:06
88 70 130
100 70 130
99 70 130
102 70 130
92 70 130
111 70 130
90 70 130
102 70 130
108 70 130
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 150f18
EN:RGY
~'\l l.O I1~· ... I (.H"~ ~. rmr www.energylab.com
wfttiul E:rCrl('MI Slnu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866-686-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 • ColiegD Station, TX 888-&80-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 02/01/11
Project: January Monthly Groundwater Work Order: C11010389
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Method: SW8260B Batch: R141871
Sample 10: Cl1010404-013AMS 16 Sample Matrix Spike Run: SATURNCA_ll0114A 01/14/1118:06
a-Xylene 110 ug/L 10 106 70 130
Toluene 100 ug/L 10 101 70 130
Xylenes, Total 330 ug/L 10 109 70 130
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 95 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 92 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 104 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 100 80 120
Sample 10: C11010404-013AMSO 16 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SATURNCA_ll0114A 01/14/11 18:42
Acetone 890 ug/L 200 89 70 130 1.4 20
Benzene 95 ug/L 10 95 70 130 5.3 20
Carbon tetrachloride 95 ug/L 10 95 70 130 3.7 20
Chloroform 100 ug/L 10 102 70 130 0.0 20
Chloromethane 91 ug/L 10 91 70 130 0.4 20
m+p-Xylenes 210 ug/L 10 104 70 130 6.9 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 920 ug/L 200 92 70 130 1.8 20
Methylene chloride 110 ug/L 10 106 70 130 4.2 20
Naphthalene 110 ug/L 10 110 70 130 2.2 20
o-Xylene 110 ug/L 10 106 70 130 0.4 20
Toluene 98 ug/L 10 98 70 130 3.6 20
Xylenes, Total 320 ug/L 10 105 70 130 4.4 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 96 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 94 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 102 80 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 97 80 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 16 of 18
EN:RGY
LI\UOJII\I G'tIL~
www.energylab.com
AIuIytIa/ Emlt.mI $Ita 1152
Heiena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Caspsr, WY 888-235-0515
Gillotta, WY 88&-&88-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • Collegs Station, TX 888-&80-2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ 111111111111111111111111111111111
C11010389
Login completed by: Corinne Wagner
Reviewed by: BL2000\hackerman
Reviewed Date: 1/14/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
3°C On Ice
Yes 0"
Yes 0"
Date Received: 1/13/2011
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Received by: em
Carrier name: FedEx
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0"
No VOA vials submitted 0
Not Applicable 0
Page 17 of 18
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record page~Of-L-'4vrlg
LA130RA TORIl 5 PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
CompanYN:O Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc. Sample Origin EPNState Compliance:
... I eN I~CN fl1:v~ :5~V\t.(~"1 izl'tud £1j~tL State: LAr-Yes G-" No 0
Report Mai~ddressB ~ G 7~:~11k.~ ;;;F-;" 222 /
Emaii: Sampi€lC (Please Print) .() ~)( 01
~~r&;/~ i5!CrI1I'I,~c, IA T xJ.f.<::I!
Invoice Address: / Involda Contact & Phone: Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Ordir:
_Scr£........t ... ~W'<.
Special Report/Formats: $: &OO&[L W®D@ ~®(!D~[§[Q) • Contact ELI prior to ~-lJ&Clr 0 (j) RUSH sample submittal
"'O.".s= for charges and COoler 10($):
~oo;:gOI (j) a [ R scheduling -See (!t.ll1t ._> 0 >'m o DW D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data) B CJ) en ro $: W Instruction Page C Ul en J: o$:= ~ C) ~ '0 Receipt Temp o POTWflNWTP Format: U c Comments: ~«~~2~ :::J U 3 °C o State: 0 LEVEL IV o .... 001 c: ~ « e ~ Qj,!g r::: ~~ 1 I-ro o Other: 0 NELAC
~ a.ro 00 ~ ~ l-e
W'N E~I16 . ~ On Ice:
:J Q).~ iii $: ~ \~ '1 .~ « l-S zc.<CIg'O ~ I ~ w 'E c,~!.. ""'6 0 ~ >1 ~ A UJ (I! en 'C CJ) ~ .~ .~ V1 C On Cooler N i .....: .-:: -~ til ~ -H Intact N -: l,~ 't: lv' en SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Collection Collection MATRIX ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Signature N (Name. location. Interval, etc.) Date TIme ( Match
1 IUw 1/ ;'iI-I~ JZ(JO /-w X ~
2 /Vt.l~) 1 t, 1)'12/11 ~1s/) /'-tJ X X >< X X IX' ~
3 rrlv\J -:<;0 ll/J·II IZ/(} ~-w )( X . ~ lnrut 4tnw, zc j-1/·11 IJ~{j J-fA) X ~
5 Y'lltAJ ~.3 f lIb ·JI /f{JO 2·vJ Ix Ix ~ I
6 mw -~5 J.// II LZ30 / -tA..J ~ ~tIlOlo..~1
7 lIZ-,;' i!:ia,d' -7t'SS'I') l::!-~
8/./ hi: J <::LJ jM P' ~ I ,
9 I ro'OJ ~
(Xl 10 ~
Custody Relinquished by fJJ;;'t~: :l.. j~'rn<>:. /330 :\w\J s"Vnaluref, I,~J.~ Rece\ved by (print): Oatef1'ime: Signature:
1Af1"~r /1.: "" . /.1. JI ... lMIt. Record RefinQuishod by (prml~ ~ Datemme' Signature: -Received by (prin/): Oate/Time: Signatu'e:
MUST be
Signed ~rlOQ ~ 7f2rBfr{ ua" 't"'lM/ !),'f5~ __ "19M u.re:
Sample Disposal: Return to Client: Lab Disposal: --~ -
In certain circumstances, samples submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data will be clearly notated on your analytical report.
Visit our web site at www.enElfQvlab.com for additional information, downloadable fee schedule. forms. and links.
TabF2
Laboratory Analytical Reports -Accelerated Monitoring
March 2011
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Sample ID:
Denison Mines
March Monthly
1103272-001A
Client Sample ID: MW-ll
Collection Date: 3/15/2011
Received Date: 3117/2011
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 3/17/2011 1926h
Units: IlgiL
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
T etrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Brornofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibrornofluorornethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
1155h
1055h
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 109
460-00-4 80-123 106
1868-53-7 80-124 98.5
2037-26-5 80-125 101
Report Date: 3/21/2011 Page 4 of 15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDW A, and ReRA are perfonncd in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling lnfonnation is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive usc of the
addressee. Privileges ofsubsequcnt use of the name ofthjs company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product OT process, or in connection
with the re.pubHcation of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility ex.cept for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good failh
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
• /\. ~(;,-I <I tJH t "_
www.energylab.com
AIl.r/fllclI ElGfIIMICt $/«, IISI
Helena, MT877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WY 888·235·0515
Gillette, WV 866·&86·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·672·1225 • College Station, lX 888-690·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
March Monthly Groundwater
Cl1030538-001
Client Sample 10: MW-ll
Analyses Result Units
METAL$ ·DISSOLVE.D
Mangahese
Report
Definitions:
Rl . Analyte reporllng limit.
Qel . Quality conlrollimit.
68 uglL
Qualifier RL
10
Report Date: 04/14/11
Collection Date: 03/15/11 11 :55
OateRecelved: 03/17/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
QCL Method Analysis Date I By
E200.8 04/13/11 21 :40 I sm(
Mel· MaXimum contamInant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 3 of 20
£:f\J:RGY
,'\ -, )1. ,. )I-t' '
WNW.energylab.com
AitIJ1tkII Exullet:tS/fICf 1m
Helena, MT 877·472·0711 • Billings. MY 800·735·4489 • Casper. WY 888·235·05111.
Gillette, WY 86&-&86-7175 • Rapid Citt. SO 888-672·1225 • College Statlon, TX 888490-2218
LABORATORY ANAL meAL IREPORT
Prepar.e(f byCaspe.r, Wy ~raheh
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
March Monthly Groundwater
Cll030538-002
Client Sample 10: MW-25
Analyses Result Units
METALS· D.ISSOl V.EO
U,l<inium
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte rep0rling limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
6.8 ug/l
Qualifier RL
0.3
Report Date: 04/14/11
Collection Date: 03/15/11 12:10
DateReceived: 03/17/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCL!
aCL Method Analysis Date I By
E200.8 03l23fl1 05:32 / sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting ilmit.
Page 4 of 20
EN:RGY
.'LUII;',I Ul~1 "
~.energyI8b.com
AIY/JfIt;M m.u-SInu 1m
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 8&&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&12-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: March Monthly Groundwater
Lab 10: C11030538-003
Client Sample 10: MW-26
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 1BO C
METALS -DISSOLVED
Uranium
RADIONUCLIDES -DISSOLVED
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-dB
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
64
0.6
3140
31.B
2.7
0.2
0.1
ND
ND
ND
1200
ND
ND
14
ND
ND
ND
116
12B
110
95.0
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
pCi/L
pC ilL
pC ilL
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 04/14/11
Collection Date: 03/15/11 12 :40
DateRecelved: 03/17/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCl!
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
D
1 A4500-CI B 03/2B/11 11 :5B 1 Ir
0.1 E353.2 03/24/11 14:21 1 dc
10 A2540 C 03/1B/1115:23 1 Imc
0.3 E200.8 03/23/11 05 :361 sml
E900.1 04/13/11 22:11 1 ep
E900.1 04/13/11 22:11 1 ep
E900.1 04/13/11 22 :11 1 ep
20 SWB260B 03/24/11 05 :49 1 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/24/11 05 :49 1 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/24/11 05:49 1 jlr
100 SWB260B 03/23/11 1 B :35 1 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/24/11 05:491 ilr
20 SW8260B 03/24/11 05:491 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 03/24/11 05:49 1 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 03/24/11 05 :49 1 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/24/11 05:491 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/24/11 05:49 1 ilr
BO-120 SWB260B 03/24/11 05:49/ ilr
70-130 SWB260B 03/24/11 05:49/ ilr
BO-120 SWB260B 03/24/11 05 :49 / jlr
BO-120 SWB260B 03/24/11 05 :49 1 jlr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
D -RL increased due to sample matrix.
Page 5 of 20
EN:RGY
1'\' .)i-.,\i{ ,"'It'
www.energylab.com
~fJ~SIIIc.'SSl
Helena, NT 817-472-0711 " BUllngs, MY 800-735 .. 4488 • Casper, WY 888-235-1515
Gillette, WY 866·686·7175 ~ R.pid liliJ, so 888-872-1225 • Colll!iaStatlon, 1X 'IW,D-2211
LABORATO.RY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
March Monthly Groundwater
C11030538·004
Client Sample ID: MW-30
Analyses Result Units
MAJORrONS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
METALS -DISSOLVED
Selenium
Report
Definitions:
Rl· Analyte reporting limit.
QCl -Quality control limit.
17
35
D -RL increase.d due to sample matrix.
mgll
ug/l
Report Date: 04/14111
Collection Date: 03/14/11 11 :50
DateRecelved: 03/17/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifier RL QCL Method Analysis Dale I By
o E3.53.2 03/24/11 14:241 dc
5 E200.8 03123/11 23:391 sml
MCl· Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 6 of 20
EN:RGY
1\ I '. _" ~ ,\ I , J;--l r' "_
WYtW.enefgyleb.eom
AiJIIyIIuI bel""" SItHI. /151
Helena, MT 877·472-0711 -81mnllS, MT 800·135-44.8 -Cuper. WV •• 8·235-.515
Gillette, WV 8&B·&86·7175 • !lapld Ctty, SD 888·&72·1225 • College Station, 1X 88 ..... 0-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LabID:
Denison Mines USA Corp
March Monthly Groundwater
Cll030538-005
Client Sample ID: MW-31
Analyses
MAJOR IONS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sulfate
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 G
Report
Definitions:
Rl -Analyte reporting limit.
QeL -Quality control limit.
Result
22
531
1250
D -Rl increased due to sample matrix.
Units
mg/l
mg/L
mg/L
Report Date: 04/14/11
Collection Date: 03/14/11 14:30
DateRecelved: 03/17/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCU
Qualifier Rt aCl Method Analysis Date I By
D E353.2 03124/11 14:39 f dc
D 10 A4500-S04E 03f21/11 15:27/1r
10 A2540 G 03f18f11 15:23'1 Imc
Mel -Maximum contaminant level.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 7 of 20
EN:RGY
1'\' 1 .H .. ,\I' )1-IlL. "
WI'IW.energyleb.com
AnI/ftIuI ExulllllCt s.u /151
Helena, MY 877-472-0711 • Billings, MY 800-735-4489 • Casper, W1888-235-0515
GiII'ette, W'( 86&-&86-7175 · Rapid City, SD 888-672-1225 . College Station, lX 888-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepa~d by Cas pel'; WY B.rancl1
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
March Monthly Groundwater
Cl1030538-006
Client Sample 10: MW-65
Analyses
METALS· OISSOL Y,ED
Uranlum
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality con trot limit.
Result Units
6.8. ugll
Qualifier Rl
0.3
Report Date: 04/14/11
COllection Date: 03/15/11 12:10
DateReceived: 03/17/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCW
QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
E200.8 03123/11 05:41 I sml
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO • NO.1 detected al Ihe reporting limil.
Page 8 of 20
A ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LAB ORA TORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client: Denison Mines
Project: March Monthly
Lab Sample ID: 1103272-002A
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Collection Date: 3115/2011
Received Date: 3/1712011 1055h
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 3/1712011 1945h
Units: Jlg/L
Dilution Factor: 1
Compound
Tetrahydrofuran
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Brornofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibrornofluorornethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Method: SW8260C
VOAs by GC/MS Method 8260C/5030C
CAS Reporting Analytical
Number Limit Result Qual
109-99-9 1.00 < 1.00
17060-07-0 77-144 108
460-00-4 80-123 106
1868-53-7 80-124 98.4
2037-26-5 80-125 101
Report Date: 3/21/2011 Page 5 of15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the rc~publieatioD of this Teport for aoy purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on eontacL This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the mles of the trade and of science.
EN:RGY
,"I )/.:,I'Jlfl '.>
www.energylab.com
MI/ftICI/£ruht5muIW
Helena, MT 877·472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735·4488 • Casper, WY 888-235·0515
GiliBita, WY 8&8·18&·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·&72·1225 • Collage Station, TX 881-&80·2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client:
Project:
LablD:
Denison Mines USA Corp
March Monthly Groundwater
C11030538-007
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank 6029
Analyses
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Toluene
Xylenes, Total
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
Report
Definitions:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
QCL -Quality control limit.
Result
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
121
100
114
95.0
Units
ug/l
ug/l
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
S -Spike recovery outside of advisory limits.
Report Date: 04/14/11
Collection Date: 03/15/11
DateRecelved: 03/17/11
Matrix: Aqueous
MCLt
Qualifier Rl QCl Method Analysis Date 1 By
20 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:241 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:241 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:24 1 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:241 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:241 ilr
20 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:24 / jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:241 jlr
1.0 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:24 1 ilr
1.0 SWB260B 03/23/11 17:24 1 ilr
1.0 SW8260B 03/23/11 17:241 ilr
S 80-120 SW8260B 03/23/11 17:24 1 ilr
70-130 SW8260B 03/23/11 17 :24 1 ilr
80-120 SW8260B 03/23/11 17:241 jlr
80-120 SW8260B 03/23/11 17:24 1 ilr
MCL -Maximum contaminant level.
NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 9 of 20
EMRGY
,\"'-,1. -j 'I-I!'
www.energyleb.eom
AnItrI/C6I El"",~ SIRu /151
Helene, MT877·472-0711 • 811l1ngs, MT800·735·4489 · Caspar, WY 888-235-0515
Gillette, WY 866·686·7175 • Rapid City, SO 1188·612·1225 • College Stati~n, TX 8811-690-2218
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Prepared' by Casper, WV Branch
Client:
Project:
Lab 10:
Denison Mines USA Corp
March Monthly Groundwater
C 11030538-008
Client Sample 10: Temp Blank
Analyses
PHYSICAL PHOPERTJF;;S
Temp~rature
Report
Definitions:
RL • Analyte reporting limit.
QCL· Quality conlrol limit.
Result Units
3.0
Qualifier RL
Report Date: 04/14/11
Collection Date: 03/15/11
DateReceived: 03/17/11
MatriX: Aqueous
MCU
QCl Method Analysis Date I By
E170.1 03117/11 09:00 / kbh
MCl -Maximum contaminant level.
NO • Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 10 of 20
A Jo Ann Tischler
Denison Mines
1050 17th Street, # 950
AMERICAN Denver, CO 80265
WEST TEL: [phone]
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
RE: March Monthly
Dear Jo Ann Tischler: Lab Set ID: 1103272
American West Analytical Laboratories received 2 sample(s) on 311712011 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to The NELAC Institute protocols unless
noted otherwise. American West Analytical Laboratories is certified by The NELAC
Institute in Utah and Texas; and is state certified in Colorado and Idaho. Certification
document is available upon request. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this
report please feel free to call.
The abbreviation "SUIT" found in organic reports indicates a surrogate compound that is
intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample injection, extraction, and/or
purging efficiency. The "Reporting Limit" found on the report is equivalent to the
practical quantitaion limit (PQL). This is the minimum concentration that can be reported
by the method referenced and the sample matrix. The reporting limit must not be confused
with any regulatory limit. Analytical results are reported to three significant figures for
quality control and calculation purposes.
Jose Rocha Thank You,
QA Officer Kyle
Gross
F . Digitally signed by Kyte F. Gross
ON: cn=Kyle F. Gross, o=AWAL,
ou=AWAL, email=kyle@awal-
labs com, c=US
Date: 2011,0321 15:31:49 -06'00'
Approved by: 1..-___________ .....
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 3/21120 11 Page 1 ofl5 V-
Ail analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC~ This report is provided for tbe exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of tbe name oftbis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of tbis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re~publication of this report for any purpose other tban for the addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for thc due perfonnance of inspection andlor analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science_
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Snit Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax (80 I )263-8687
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Client:
Project:
Lab Set ID:
Date Received:
Lab Sample ID
1l03272-001A
1103272-002A
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Deni on Mines Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
March Monthly
1103272
31'17/2011 1055h
Client Sample ID Date Col1ected Matrix Analysis
MW-l1 3/] 5/2011 1155h Aqueou VOA by GCIMS Method
8260CI5030C
Trip Blank 311512011 Aqueous VOA by GC/MS Method
8260CI5030C
Report Date: 31211201 I Page 2 of 1 5
AJI .""lysct opph.oble 10 Ill< CWfl. SOWA, "nd ReM nn: "",fom,.d in Record, .. ,,, 10 Na,\C prolooolJ. reninenl 50mpling infonn."on is 10<01.<1 On Ihe .u.chod COCo This repurt i. pruvhkd ror .he o.cluoive "'. or.ho a:ddfi:~"'e. Pri\lilcges orsubS4."qutul ~ offlx: nomo orlhiscomp;ny or Dny membc1' ofitJ Stllrr, orruprooucliun .,r'hl~ report in connc:cllDn with the advcrtJscmenl. promucion or 5.1Iic. O(MY prochn:::' or pr~ or in connection
wi.h Ihe ""publl""lion orlhi. "'pon {or .ny fIIllJl<l<' orhor Ih:m for Ihe .ddrtoi<:t will be 8mn.ed only on conloOi. TIll> ""mpony .cccpl. no rcspolUlbilhy <.llccp' for rhe dlle ",,"onnonce orillSpection ,"dlor an.lysi. in good r.ilb
nod accordl"!> to.he RIles of rho trndc.ntI .f"larco.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
Volatile Case Narrative
Client:
Contact:
Denison Mines
Jo Ann Tischler
March Monthly
1103272
Project:
Lab SetID:
Sample Receipt Information:
Date of Receipt:
Date(s) of Collection:
Sample Condition:
C-O-C Discrepancies:
Method:
Analysis:
3117/2011
3115/2011
Intact
None
SW-8468260C/5030C
Tetrahydrofuran
General Set Comments: Tetrahydrofuran was not observed above reporting limits.
Holding Time and Preservation Requirements: All samples were received in appropriate
containers and properly preserved. The analysis and preparation of all samples were
performed within the method holding times following the methods stated on the analytical
reports.
Analytical QC Requirements: All instrument calibration and calibration check
requirements were met. All internal standard recoveries met method criterion.
Batch QC Requirements: MB, LCS, MS, MSD, RPD, and Surrogates:
Method Blanks (MRs): No target analytes were detected above reporting limits,
indicating that the procedure was free from contamination.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCSs): All LCS recoveries were within control
limits, indicating that the preparation and analysis were in control.
Matrix Spike 1 Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSIMSD): All percent recoveries and
RPDs (Relative Percent Differences) were inside established limits, indicating no
apparent matrix interferences.
Surrogates: All surrogate recoveries were within established limits.
Corrective Action: None required.
Report Date: 3/21/2011 Page 3 of15
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols, Pertinent sampling information is located on the attacbed COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name oftbis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this rcport in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication oftbis report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no rcsponsibility except for the due perfonnance ofinspcction andlor Qnalysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscicDCC.
A
Client: Denison ~ines
Lab Set ID: 1103272
Project: ~arch~onthly
Sample ID Analyte
LCS VOC 031711B Tetrahydrofuran
LCS VOC 031711B Surr: 1,2-Dich1oroethane-d4
LCS VOC 031711B Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
LCS VOC 031711B Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
LCS VOC 031711B Surr: To1uene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone]. Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e·mail: [e-mail]. web: www.awaJ-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
~SVOA
QCType: LCS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
~glL SW8260C 17.6 20.00 0 88.2 43-146
%REC SW8260C 53.4 50.00 107 69-132
%REC SW8260C 49.1 50.00 98.2 85-118
%REC SW8260C 49.4 50.00 98.9 80-120
%REC SW8260C 49.0 50.00 98.1 81-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
3117/2011 1810h
3117/2011 1810h
3/17/2011 1810h
3117/2011 1810h
3117/2011 1810h
Report Date: 3/2112011 Page 6 of 15
AU analyses DppliCllble 10 the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent SGmpling infonnation is 10000ted on the auached COCo This repon is provided for the exclusive use of !be addressee. Privilegelli of subsequent usc oflhc name oftbis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
afthis repD:'1: £~ conueclion whh the IIdvert4cmmt. ptOmoUOIl or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspeclion andlor analysis in good
faith tlnd according lO the rules of the trade and oflC~c:rn:c.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1103272
Project: March Monthly
Sample ID Analyte
MB VOC 031711B Tetrahydrofuran
MB VOC 031711B Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
MB VOC 03171lB Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
MB VOC 031711B Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
MB VOC 031711B Surr: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Units
flg/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone]. Toll Free [phone]. Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]. web: www.awal-Iabscom
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact: 10 Ann Tischler
MSVOA
MBLK
Dept:
QC Type:
Amount Original
Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
SW8260C < 1.00
SW8260C 53.4 50.00 107 69-132
SWS260C 52.0 50.00 104 S5-IIS
SWS260C 48.8 50.00 97.5 SO-120
SW8260C 50.5 50.00 101 81-120
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
3117/2011 1907h
3/17/2011 1907h
3117/2011 1907h
3117/2011 1907h
3/17/2011 1907h
Report Date: 3/2112011 Page 7 of 15
An analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accordance 10 NELAe protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the anached COCo This report is provided for the ex-elusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
afthis report in connection with the advertisemenl, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection witb the fe-publication of this report for any purpose otber than for the addressee witt be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good
faith and according to the rules oCthe trnde and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1103272
Project: March Monthly
Sample ID Analyte
1103272-001AMS Tetrahydrofuran
l103272-001AMS Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
l103272-001AMS Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1103272-001AMS Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1103272-001AMS Surr: Toluene-dS
AMERICAN WEST ANAL YTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
(801) 263·8686, Toll Free (888) 263·8686, Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]. web: www.awaJ-labs.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MS
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
Ilg/L SWS260C 19.4 20.00 0 97.1 43-146
%REC SWS260C 54.6 50.00 109 77-144
%REC SWS260C 4S.4 50.00 96.S SO-123
%REC SWS260C 50.1 50.00 100 SO-124
%REC SWS260C 49.6 50.00 99.2 SO-125
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual Date Analyzed
3/17/2011 2004h
3/17/20 II 2004h
3/17/2011 2004h
3117/20 II 2004h
3/1 7/20 II 2004h
Report Date: 3/21/2011 Page 8 ofl5
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and ReRA are performed in accord.mee to NELAe prolOcols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the anached COCo This repon is provided fOT the cltclusive use oftbe addressee. Privilegt:s of subsequent use oflhe name arthis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisemenL, promotion or sale of any product or process. or in connection with the re·publicntion or this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be grn.nted only on conLaCl, This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfonnance of inspection imdlor analysis in good
faith and according to the rules of lhe trade and of science.
A
Client: Denison Mines
Lab Set ID: 1103272
Project: March Monthly
Sample ID Analyte
1103272-00IAMSD Tetrahydrofuran
1103272-00IAMSD Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
1103272-001AMSD Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1103272-001AMSD Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
1103272-001AMSD Surr: Toluene-d8
AMERICAN WEST ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
[phone], Toll Free [phone], Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail], web: www.awaJ-labs_com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Contact:
Dept:
Jo Ann Tischler
MSVOA
QC Type: MSD
Amount Original
Units Method Result Spiked Amount %REC Limits
Ilg/L SW8260C 20.0 20.00 0 99.8 43-146
%REC SW8260C 53.5 50.00 107 77-144
%REC SW8260C 49.3 50.00 98.6 80-123
%REC SW8260C 50.4 50.00 101 80-124
%REC SW8260C 49.0 50.00 97.9 80-125
Kyle F, Gross
Laboratory Director
Jose Rocha
QA Officer
RPD
%RPD Limit Qual
2.79 25
Date Analyzed
3117/2011 2024h
3117/2011 2024h
3/17/2011 2024h
3117/2011 2024h
3/17/2011 2024h
Report Date: 3/21/2011 Page 9 of15
All analyses applicable lO the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to l\'ELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COCo This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges ofsubsequenl use of the name of1.bis company or any member ofi1S staff, or reproduction
of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for lhe addressee will be granted only on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection andlor analysis in good
faith and according to the rules of the trade and of scietlce.
Data Path
Data f'ile
Acq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
JI.!.S Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Ouant Title
QLa:'lt Update
Response via
1800000
1700000
1600000
'500000
1300000
1200000
1100000
'000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
'00000
Ouan titation Report
C:\msdchem\1\OATA\MARIl-C\17MAR11A\
F75L2721 .D
17 Mar 2011 7 :26 pm
1103272-00lA
SAMP 5 . OM!, 10F3
37 Sample Multiplier: 1
Mar 18 07:52 :51 2011
C:\MSOCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_30.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Mar 02 06 :13 :07 2011
Initial Calibration
(OT Reviewed)
TIC: F75l2721 Dodala.ms
I
Ii
J
,j
mmo-> o,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 8.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFUL!.W_30 .M Fri Mar 18 08 :34:29 2011
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
W>undance 190000 0
180000 a
170000 0
1600000
1500000
140000 0
130000 a
I 1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\MARll-C\l7MARllA\
F76L2722.D
17 Mar 2011 7:45 pm
1l03272-002A
SAMP 5.0ML 10F3
38 Sample Multiplier: 1
Mar 18 07:53:18 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_30.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Mar 02 06:13:07 2011
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: F76L2722.D\data.ms
-i c!> c: ~ ~ :l1
~ i3 -t
S ~
en !f
1 ~ " .c !'!
t! g
" '5 ~ E !'! <D !'! g " u: en
~
q
" q c: .. i!! li i E !'! g g
15 {i
E 0 !'! "t J2 0 5 5 en <1l
o i A It IA
,
I I , I 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.(30 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11 .00 11 .50 I
AFULLW_3 0.M Fri Mar 18 08:34:40 2011 Report Date: 3/21/2ijl:ljgE¥age'l11 ofl5
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Quantitation Report
C:\msdchem\1\DATA\MARII-C\17MAR11A\
F7lLCS20 .D
17 Mar 2011 6:10 pm
LCS VOC 031711B
LCS SEE COVERSHEET FOR ID AND AMOUNTS
34 Sample Multiplier: 1
Mar 17 21:20:29 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_30.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Mar 02 06:13:07 2011
Initial Calibration
(QT Reviewed)
TIC: F71 LCS20.Dldata.ms
3200000
3000000
~
2800000 ~ " ~ 0 :E 2600000 ()
0 ~
2400000
2000000
1800000
1600000
1400000 E
1200000
.. .!
~ I "" ~Q).s 400000 oro *,," iil2 ~~1 E5 ~ ~i Ee-t? e.gt-
200000 "'ti
TIme-->
AFULLW_30.M Fri Mar 18 07:48:48 2011 Report Date: 3/2 1I2l'i' l'lI.g Ep'age'll 2 of 15
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\MARII-C\17MARllA\
F74LMBLK.D
17 Mar 2011 7:07 pm
(QT Reviewed)
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
MB VOC 031711B
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
'Abundance
1900000
1800000
1700000
1600000
1 1500000
1400000
1300000
1200000
1100000
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
o A
MBLK 5. OML
36 Sample Multiplier: 1
Mar 18 07:49:41 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_30.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Mar 02 06:13:07 2011
Initial Calibration
TIC; F74LMBLK.D\data.ms
~ ~ ~
•
~ ~ j
a: ~
~ " c: Cl) ~ ~
E 11 e ~ g
'5 Sl
E :§ e '" ,g <'t '" !5 " Cl) Cl)
f " [:! ~ .2 .c .Y 0 .t.
~ ~
" I:! ~ 0 " '3 E e CD ~ Cl)
, I I I .. I I \ me .. > 2.00 250 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6,9Q 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50
AFULLW_30.M Fri Mar 18 07:49:48 2011 Report Date: 312 I 12ijfllgEP'agtf!1 3 orl5
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
Tim&->
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\1\DATA\MAR11-C\17MARllA\
F77S2721. D
17 Mar 2011 8:04 pm
1l03272-001AMS
MS 5.0ML 20F3
39 Sample Multiplier: 1
Mar 17 20:16:54 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_30.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Mar 02 06:13:07 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: F77S2721.Dldata.ms
AFULLW_30.M Fri Mar 18 08:34:52 2011 Report Date: 3/2 1/2Q'llIg%ge'l1 4 of 15
Quantitation Report
C:\msdehem\l\DATA\MARlI-C\17MARIIA\
F78D2721.D
17 Mar 2011 8:24 pm
1l03272-001AMSD
Data Path
Data File
Aeq On
Operator
Sample
Mise MSD 5.0ML 30F3
ALS Vial
Quant Time:
Quant Method
Quant Title
QLast Update
Response via
40 Sample Multiplier: 1
Mar 17 20:35:58 2011
C:\MSDCHEM\1\METHODS\AFULLW_30.M
VOA Calibration
Wed Mar 02 06:13:07 2011
Initial Calibration
(Not Reviewed)
TIC: F78D2721.Dldata.ms
3200000
3000000
I 2800000
2600000
2400000
2200000
"!. CD
2000000 ~ c: i '!l ~ ~ ~ i (/J
~ 1800000
Ij
E
~I
...
1600000
1400000
1200000
1000000
AFULLW_30.M Fri Mar 18 08:35:02 2011 Report Date: 3/21/2{jfl\g%ge115 of 15
American West Analytical Laboratories
WORK ORDER Summary
Client: Denison Mines
Client ID: DEN 100 Contact: Jo Ann Tischler
Project: March Monthly QC Level: LEVEL III
Work Order: 1103272
Page 1 of 1
3117/2011
WOType: Project
Comments: No Hard Copies (UL). QC 3 & Summary. EDD-CSV. Report THF to 1 !lgIL.;
1l1'b:.tf., ~ ~
SampleID
1103272-001 A
1103272-002A
Client Sample ID
MW-li
Trip Blank
Collected Date Received Date Date Due
3115/2011 11 :55:00 AM 311712011 10:55:00 AM 313 112011
3/1512011 3131120 1)
Matrix Test Code Sel Storage
Aqueous 8260-W ~ VOCFridgc J
S260-W ~ VOCFridge
~ I Sheet 1 of 1
/((j~'-)L
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Samples Shipped to: American West Analytical Lab
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Ut 84115
Contact: Ryan Palmer or David Turk
Ph: 435 678 2221
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Chain of Custody/Sampling Analysis Request
Project Sam lers Name
March Monthl Tanner Holliday
Date Time
Sample 10 Collected Collected Laboratory Analysis Requested
MW-11 3/15/2011 1155 THF
TRIP BLANK s(I"~"
Please notify Ryan Palmer or Tanner Holliday of Reciept tempature on these samples Immediately! Thank
Iyou.
DatelTime
o DN/A
COC Tane Was:
Prese..!)t on Outer Package
19'1"es 0 No 0 N/A
Unbrok94n Outer package
!IY1es DNo DN/A
Present on §;unple
DYes [l}'No 0 N/A
Unbroken on SamplV'
DYes 0 No rn-NIA
Lab Set ID: ----llD~2-r 2------
Container T
o AWAL Su
DAWALSu
o AWAL Su
Notes:
I Properly Preserved [iY\'es 0 No 0 N/A I Notes:
Notes:
Rec. Within Hold
Notes:
Bottle Type
Ammonia
COD
Cyanide
Metals
N02 &NO:;
Nutrients
0&0
Phenols
Sulfide
TKN
TOC
TP0 4
TPH
Procedure: 1)
2}
3}
4)
5)
.6)
7)
es oNo Discrepancies Between Labels and CDC
Preservative All pHs OK
pH <2 H2S0 4
pH <2 H2S0 4
PH >12 NaOH
pH <2 RNO;
pH <2 H2S0~
pH <2 H2SO4
pH<2HCL
pH <2 H2SO4
pH > 9NaOH, ZnAC
pH <2 H2SO4 /'
pH <2 H3P04
pH <2 H2SO4 /'
pH <2HCL V
/'
/' v"r
V
Pour a small amount of sample in the sample lid
Pour sample from Lid gently over wide range pH paper
Do Not dip the pH paper in the sample bottle or lid
Notes:
/
./
1/ 7
V
/'
V
/'
If sample is not preserved properly list its extension and receiving pH in the appropriate column above
Flag COC and notify client for further instructions
Place client conversation on coe
Samples may be adjusted at client request
V
DYes
UPS Internet Shipping: Shipment Label
UPS Internet Shipping: View/Print Label
1. Print the label(s): Select the Print button on the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your
browser does not support this function select Print from the File menu to print the label.
2. Fold the printed label at the solid line below. Place the label in a UPS Shipping Pouch. If
you do not have a pouch, affix the folded label using clear plastic shipping tape over the entire
label.
3. GETTING YOUR SHIPMENT TO UPS
Customers without a Daily Pickup
Schedule a same day or future day Pickup to have a UPS driver pickup all of your Internet
Shipping packages.
Hand the package to any UPS driver in your area.
Take your package to any location of The UPS Store®, UPS Drop Box, UPS Customer Center,
UPS Alliances (Office DepofID or Staples®) or Authorized Shipping Outlet near you. Items sent
via UPS Return ServicesSM (including via Ground) are also accepted at Drop Boxes.
To find the location nearest you, please visit the 'Find Locations' Quick link at ups.com.
Customers with a Daily Pickup
Your driver will pickup your shipment{s) as usual.
FOLD HERE
Page I of 1
https ://www.ups.com/uis/create ? Action OriginPajr=print_Receipt&POPUP _LEVEL= 1 &... 3/16/2011
EI\ERGY
?'. )1./\ I .' I ( oJ
www.energylab.com
~Em-'SI«, IW
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-135·4489 • Casper, WY 888-235·0515
Gillette, WY 8&&·&86·7175 • Rapid City, SO 188·172-1225 • College Station, TX 888-&90·2218
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
April 14, 2011
Denison Mines USA Corp
6425 S Hwy 191
Blanding, UT 84511
Workorder No.: C11030538 Quote ID: C1640 -pac Wells
Project Name: March Monthly Groundwater
Energy Laboratories, Inc. Casper WY received the following 8 samples for Denison Mines USA Corp on 3/17/2011 for analysis.
Sample 10 Client Sample 10 Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test
C11030538-001 MW-11 03/1 5/11 11 :55 03/17/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C 11030538-002 MW-25 03/15/11 12:10 03/17/11 Aqueous Same As Above
C11030538-003 MW-26 03/1 5/11 12 :40 03/17/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Chloride
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Gross Alpha minus Rn222 and
Uranium
Solids, Total Dissolved
SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C11030538-004 MW-30 03/14/11 11 :50 03/17/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
C11030538-005 MW-31 03/14/11 14 :30 03/17/11 Aqueous Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite
Solids, Total Dissolved
Sulfate
C11030538-006 MW-65 03/15/11 12:10 03/17/11 Aqueous Metals by ICP/ICPMS, Dissolved
C11030538-007 Trip Blank 6029 03/15/11 0 :00 03/17/11 Aqueous SW8260B VOCs, Standard List
C 11030538-008 Temp Blank 03/15/11 0 :00 03/17/11 Aqueous Temperature
This report was prepared by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 2393 Salt Creek Hwy., Casper, WY 82601. Any exceptions
or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the
Case Narrative.
The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call.
Report Approved By:
cS¥~J) uJ~~
Reporting Supervisor
Digitally signed by
Stephanie Waldrop
Date: 2011.04.14 10:33:19 -06:00
Page 1 of 20
www.energyiab.com Helena, MT 871·472-0711 • Bllllnls, MT 800·735·4489 • Casper, WV 888·235·D515
Alu/fIIcM rmu.-SIIa lISt WV 8S6·&86·7175 • SD 188·672·1225 • TX 888-&80·2218
CLIENT: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: March Monthly Groundwater Report Date: 04/14/11
Sample Delivery Group: C11030538 CASE NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL SAMPLE SUBMITIAL(S)
All original sample submittals have been returned with the data package.
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE COMPLIANCE: 4"C (±2"C)
Temperature of samples received may not be considered properly preserved by accepted standards. Samples that are
hand delivered immediately after collection shall be considered acceptable if there is evidence that the chilling process has
begun.
GROSS ALPHA ANALYSIS
Method 900.0 for gross alpha and gross beta is intended as a drinking water method for low TDS waters. Data provided by
this method for non potable waters should be viewed as inconsistent.
RADON IN AIR ANALYSIS
The desired exposure time is 48 hours (2 days). The time delay in returning the canister to the laboratory for processing
should be as short as possible to avoid excessive decay. Maximum recommended delay between end of exposure to
beginning of counting should not exceed 8 days.
SOIL/SOLID SAMPLES
All samples reported on an as received basis unless otherwise indicated.
ATRAZINE, SIMAZINE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Data for PCBs, Atrazine and Simazine are reported from EPA 525.2. PCB data reported by ELI reflects the results for seven
individual Aroclors. When the results for all seven are NO (not detected), the sample meets EPA compliance criteria for
PCB monitoring.
SUBCONTRACTING ANALYSIS
Subcontracting of sample analyses to an outside laboratory may be required. If so, ENERGY LABORATORIES will utilize its
branch laboratories or qualified contract laboratories for this service. Any such laboratories will be indicated within the
Laboratory Analytical Report.
BRANCH LABORATORY LOCATIONS
eli-b -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Billings, MT
eli-g -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Gillette, WY
eli-h -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Helena, MT
eli-r -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -Rapid City, SO
eli-t -Energy Laboratories, Inc. -College Station, TX
CERTIFICATIONS:
USEPA: WY00002, Radiochemical WY00937; FL-DOH NELAC: E87641, Radiochemical E871 017; California: 02118CA;
Oregon: WY200001; Utah: 3072350515; Virginia: 00057; Washington: C1903
ISO 17025 DISCLAIMER:
The results of this Analytical Report relate only to the items submitted for analysis.
ENERGY LABORATORIES, INC. -CASPER,WY certifies that certain method selections contained in this report meet
requirements as set forth by the above accrediting authorities. Some results requested by the client may not be covered
under these certifications. All analysis data to be submitted for regulatory enforcement should be certified in the sample
state of origin. Please verify ELI's certification coverage by visiting www.energylab.com
ELI appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this analytical service. For additional information and services visit our
web page www.energylab.com.
Page 2 of 20
EN:RGY
/\ \ , (~I, J, I ( I ~ I. '.
www.energylab.com
~/buIIMcI SInu 1m Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-73S-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gilletta, WY 818-181-7175 • Rapid City, so 888-&72-1225 • College StatiDn, TX 818-1110-221 8
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: March Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A2540 C
Sample 10: MBLK1_
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample 10: LCS1_ Laboratory Control Sample
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C 990 mg/L
Sample 10: Cll030560-001COUP Sample Duplicate
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 145 mg/L
Sample 10: Cll030567-001AMS Sample Matrix Spike
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS@ 180 C 2130 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 04/14/11
Work Order: Cll030538
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit
Run: BAL-C ll0318C
4
Run: BAL-1_110318C
10 99 90 110
Run: BAL-1 110318C -
10
Run: BAL-1 _110318C
10 103 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimlt Qual
0.8
Batch: R143889
03/18/11 15:22
03/18/11 15 :22
03/18/11 15:25
10
03/18/11 15:29
Page 11 of 20
EN:RGY
:., ,(.1.:\ I ! I, , .
www.enerD1ab.com
MflllJalElallMaJla 1m Helena, MT 177-472-0711 • Billings, MT BOI-735-4489 • Casper, WY 811-235-0515
Gillaita, WY 11&-186-7175 • Rapid City, SD 11.-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 811-610-221 B
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: March Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-CI B
Sample 10: MBLK9-110328
Chloride
Sample 10: C11030538-003AMS
Chloride
Sample 10: C11030538-003AMSO
Chloride
Sample 10: LCS35-110328
Chloride
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
240 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
242 mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
3570 mg/L
Report Date: 04/14/11
Work Order: C11030538
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: 11 0328-CL-TTR-W
Run: TITRATION_11 0328A 03/28/11 11 :41
0.5
Run : TITRATlON_110328A
1.0 100 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110328A
1.0 101 90 110
Run: TITRATION_110328A
1.0 101 90 110
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
0.7
03/28/11 12:21
03/28/11 12:23
10
03/28/11 12:26
Page 12 of 20
EI'ERGY
.:. \ • ( )' j". I ( I ~ II • ~
www.energylab.com
AM/ftIlM~stnc. 1m
Hulena, MT 877-472-D711 • Billings, MT 80D-735-4489 • Caspar, WY 888-235-D515
GUlotta, WY 81&-&BB-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • College Station, IX 888-610-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: March Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: A4500-S04 E
Sample 10: LCS-1_110321
Sulfate
Sample 10: MBLK-C110321
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11030538-005AMS
Sulfate
Sample 10: C11030538-005AMSO
Sulfate
Qualifiers:
RL· Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Laboratory Control Sample
4940 mg/L
Method Blank
NO mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
723 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
726 mg/L
Report Date: 04/14/11
Work Order: C11030538
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimlt Qual
Batch: 11 0321_C S04-TURB-W
Run: TURB-2_110321A 03/21/11 14:21
100 103 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110321A 03/21 /1114:23
0.8
Run: TURB-2_110321A 03/21/11 15:28
10 100 90 110
Run: TURB-2_110321A 03/21/11 15:31
10 101 90 110 0.4 10
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
Page 13 of 20
EI\ERGY
.'" , ,\. ) S l .• I ~.I I , r '.
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Heltna, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 881-235-0515
Gillatta, WY 11&-68&-7175 . Rapid City, SD 888-&72-1225 • CDilege station, IX 8II-&ID-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Report Date: 04/14/11
Project: March Monthly Groundwater Work Order: C11030538
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank
Uranium ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank
Uranium 0.0575 mg/L
Sample 10: C11030376-008BMS4 Sample Matrix Spike
Uranium 31.0 mg/L
Sample 10: C11030376-008BMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Uranium 31.3 mg/L
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank
Selenium 0.0004 mg/L
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank
Selenium 0.0523 mg/L
Sample 10: C11 030538-001 AMS4 Sample Matrix Spike
Selenium 0.0466 mg/L
Sample 10: C11030538-001AMSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Selenium 0.0469 mg/L
Method: E200.8
Sample 10: LRB Method Blank
Manganese ND mg/L
Sample 10: LFB Laboratory Fortified Blank
Manganese 0.0518 mg/L
Sample 10: Cl1040343-0050MS4 Sample Matrix Spike
Manganese 0.0682 mg/L
Sample 10: C11040343-0050MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Manganese 0.0710 mg/L
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO RPOLimit Qual
Batch: R143921
Run : ICPMS2-C_ll 0322A 03/22/11 15:56
IE-OS
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll 0322A 03/22111 16:00
0.00030 115 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_ll0322A 03/23/11 05 :08
0.00030 70 130 A
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0322A 03/23/11 05:12
0.00030 70 130 0.9 20 A
Batch: R143967
Run : ICPMS2-C_11 0323A 03/23/11 12:03
0.0002
Run: ICPMS2-C_l1 0323A 03/23/1112:10
0.0010 104 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_110323A 03/23/11 23:18
0.0010 90 70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0323A 03/23/11 23:25
0.0010 91 70 130 0.6 20
Batch: R144792
Run: ICPMS2-C_l10413A 04/13/11 11 :57
5E-05
Run: ICPMS2-C_110413A 04/13/11 12:03
0.0010 104 85 115
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0413A 04/13/11 18:30
0.010 96 70 130
Run: ICPMS2-C_11 0413A 04/13/11 18 :37
0.010 102 70 130 4.0 20
A -The analyte level was greater than four times the spike level. In
accordance with the method % recovery is not calculated.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 14 of 20
EN:RGY
,., 1(,tl •• lt,!/!I·,
www.energylab.com
AMI/fIa/~sr-1m
Helena, MT877-472-D711 • Billings, MT800-735-4488 . Casper, WV 881-235-0515
Gillette, WY 88&-888-7175 • Rapid City, SO 888-&72-1225 • College StatiDn, 1J( 888-610-2218
QA/Qe Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: March Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count Result Units
Method: E353.2
Sample 10: MBLK·1
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: LCS·2
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11030528-014AMS
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Sample 10: C11030528-014AMSO
Nitrogen, Nitrate+Nitrite as N
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Method Blank
ND mg/L
Laboratory Control Sample
2.62 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike
4.16 mg/L
Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
4.25 mg/L
Report Date:
Work Order:
RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPO
Run : TECHNICON_11 0324A
0.06
Run : TECHNICON_11 0324A
0.10 105 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_110324A
0.10 104 90 110
Run: TECHNICON_11 0324A
0.10 10B 90 110 2.1
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
04/14/11
Cll030538
RPOLlmlt Qual
Batch: R144035
03/24/11 12:31
03/24/11 12 :34
03/24/11 14:06
03/24/11 14:09
10
Page 15 of 20
EN:RGY
• \' I ~ .. , I," l,! ... 1\ ••
www.energylab.com
/NIffJaI buIMu S/nu 1152
Helena, MT 877-472-D711 • Billings, MT 8DO-735-44111 • Casper, WV 8118-235-0515
Gillette, WV 1181-886-717!1 • Rapid City, SD 1118-&72-1225 • Collage Station, 1X 881-680-221 8
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp
Project: March Monthly Groundwater
Analyte Count
Method: E900.1
Result
Sample 10: MB-GA-0426
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U
3 Method Blank
0.1
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
0.09
0.1
Units
pCi/L
pCi/L
pCi/L
Sample 10: LCS-GA-Q426 Laboratory Control Sample
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 11.0 pC ilL
Sample 10: TAP WATER-MS Sample Matrix Spike
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 21.8 pCi/L
Sample 10: TAP WATER-MSO Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U 24.S pCilL
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit.
MDC -Minimum detectable concentration
Report Date: 04/14/11
Work Order: Cll030538
RL %REC Low Limit High limit
Run : GSOOOW_ll0411A
Run: GSOOOW_ll0411A
103 70 130
Run: GSOOOW_ll0411A
102 70 130
Run: GSOOOW_l10411A
11S 70 130
ND -Not detected at the reporting limit.
RPO RPOLimit Qual
12
Batch: GA-0426
04/13/11 22:11
U
04/13/11 22:11
04/13/1122:11
04/13/11 22:11
17.7
U -Not detected at minimum detectable concentration
Page 16 of 20
EN:RGY
,~\ (' I . ,I I.. : ~ 1\ ••
www.energylab.com
IM/tfIaI EIuIIeiru stnu IW
Hellma, MT 877-.472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GillBlte, WY 81&-&86-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-612-1225 • College Station, TX 888-610-2218
QA/QC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 04/14/11
Project: March Monthly Groundwater Work Order: C11030538
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Method: SWB260B Batch: R143997
Sample 10: 23-Mar-11_LCS_4 15 Laboratory Control Sample Run: 5975VOC1_110323B 03/23/11 13 :21
Benzene 12 ug/L 1.0 115 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 11 ug/L 1.0 111 70 130
Chloroform 11 ug/L 1.0 110 70 130
Chloromethane 11 ug/L 1.0 111 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 21 ug/L 1.0 107 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 110 ug/L 20 108 70 130
Methylene chloride 9.9 ug/L 1.0 99 70 130
Naphthalene 11 ug/L 1.0 110 70 130
o-Xylene 11 ug/L 1.0 109 70 130
Toluene 11 ug/L 1.0 109 70 130
Xylenes, Total 32 ug/L 1.0 108 70 130
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 105 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 105 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 104 80 130
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 104 80 120
Sample 10: 23-Mar-11_MBLK_6 15 Method Blank Run: 5975VOC1 _110323B 03/23/11 14:32
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride NO ug/L 1.0
Chloroform NO ug/L 1.0
Chloromethane NO ug/L 1.0
m+p-Xylenes NO ug/L 1.0
Methyl ethyl ketone NO ug/L 20
Methylene chloride NO ug/L 1.0
Naphthalene NO ug/L 1.0
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0
Xylenes, Total NO ug/L 1.0
Surr: 1,2-0ichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 119 80 120
Surr: Oibromofluoromethane 1.0 108 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 112 80 120
Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 94 80 120
Sample 10: C11030554-001FMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run : 5975VOC1 _110323B 03/23/11 20:21
Benzene 120 ug/L 10 116 70 130
Carbon tetrachloride 120 ug/L 10 121 70 130
Chloroform 120 ug/L 10 120 70 130
Chloromethane 110 ug/L 10 111 70 130
m+p-Xylenes 220 ug/L 10 111 70 130
Methyl ethyl ketone 1100 ug/L 200 110 70 130
Methylene chloride 100 ug/L 10 100 70 130
Naphthalene 81 ug/L 10 81 70 130
o-Xylene 110 ug/L 10 113 70 130
Toluene 110 ug/L 10 112 70 130
Xylenes, Total 330 ug/L 10 111 70 130
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 17 of 20
EN:RGY
" ). ,II. j"I!'
www.energytab.com
IM/fIIO/ EIuIIItIa SfIIU IIBZ
Helena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800-735-4489 • Casper, WY 888-235-0515
GiliaIte, WY 88&-888-7175 • Rapid City, SD 888-872-1225 • COIIDgS Station, TX 888-&10-221 8
QAlQC Summary Report
Prepared by Casper, WY Branch
Client: Denison Mines USA Corp Report Date: 04/14/11
Project: March Monthly Groundwater Work Order: C11030538
Analyte Count Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High limit RPD RPDLimit Qual
Method: SWB260B Batch: R143997
Sample 10: C11 030554-001 FMS 15 Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5975VOCC 110323B 03/23/11 20:21
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 106 80 120
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 110 70 130
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 106 BO 120
Surr: Toluene-dB 1.0 106 BO 120
Sample 10: C11 030554-001 FMSD 15 Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5975VOC1 -110323B 03/23/11 20:57
Benzene 110 ug/L 10 114 70 130 1.7 20
Carbon tetrachloride 120 ug/L 10 115 70 130 5.1 20
Chloroform 110 ug/L 10 114 70 130 5.1 20
Chloromethane 110 ug/L 10 107 70 130 3.7 20
m+p-Xylenes 210 ug/L 10 107 70 130 3.1 20
Methyl ethyl ketone 1100 ug/L 200 112 70 130 1.B 20
Methylene chloride 99 ug/L 10 99 70 130 1.2 20
Naphthalene 97 ug/L 10 97 70 130 1B 20
o-Xylene 110 ug/L 10 109 70 130 3.6 20
Toluene 110 ug/L 10 110 70 130 2.2 20
Xylenes, Total 320 ug/L 10 10B 70 130 3.3 20
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 1.0 106 BO 120 0.0 10
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 10B 70 130 0.0 10
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 106 BO 120 0.0 10
Surr: Toluene-dB 1.0 104 BO 120 0.0 10
Qualifiers:
RL -Analyte reporting limit. NO -Not detected at the reporting limit.
MOC -Minimum detectable concentration
Page 18 of 20
EN:RGY
'. • 0,' I I :.
www.energy1eb.com
~~SItIc.'1U
HBlena, MT 877-472-0711 • Billings, MT 800·735-44B9 • Casper, WY BBI·235·0515
Gillette, WY 186-188·7175 • Rapid City, SD 888·172·1225 • CoIlsgs Station, 1X 881·690·2218
Workorder Receipt Checklist
Denison Mines USA Corp
I ~IIIIIIIIIIIIII~ IIIIIIII!III~ III~ III~ IIIIII ~II
C11030538
Login completed by: Halley Ackerman
Reviewed by: BL2000\kschroeder
Reviewed Date: 3/18/2011
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Chain of custody present?
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?
Samples in proper container/bottle?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?
All samples received within holding time?
ContainerfTemp Blank temperature:
Water -VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water -pH acceptable upon receipt?
Contact and Corrective Action Comments:
None
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes 0
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
3.0'C On Ice
Yes [{1
Yes [{1
Date Received: 3/17/2011
Received by: ha
Carrier Fed Ex
name:
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No D
No 0
Not Present 0
Not Present 0
Not Present [{1
No VOA vials submitted D
Not Applicable D
Page 19 of 20
)
-u III (C
CD
I\) o o -I\) o
Chain of Custody and Analytical Request Record Page .-l..-of ~
PLEASE PRINT (Provide as much information as possible.)
Company Name:
LGVJ;SON_ rv1/~es
Report Mail Addres~ 8""6 Q pD. r.::>~ (
J5hnJJ;',c lA-1' 84~JI
Invoice Address: 'LJ T
,-S'oo-~
Special Report/Formats:
DDW D EDD/EDT(Electronic Data)
D POTWNlJWTP Format: ___ _ o State: ___ _ o Other: ___ _
D LEVEL IV D NELAC
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Project Name, PWS, Permit, Etc.
(YJ~~~~Y6lA~ /kj,J1
Contact Name: tb)lneiFax:
12~J IdJm~ CrY 222-1
Invoic€l Contact &: Phone:
c Sr:<_ w-.4!
~ ~W®!l~ [Jd~®@~ o .... 1Il01ll~ ~ .~~~~~ ~ J ~ ~oo~~~ I 8:s:=a ~ g' 0 o«~lml~ « ~~~§~ ~ ~~~. ~ ~ 0)--0) s: zc.«IClo W E ~ W ~ W
(Name, Location. Interval,. etc.l_'------===-------'-_--'-".:..:..=._-'--___ ----'-_-'------L_-=---=I-----'------'~____I_____'..I__
MIAJ-II 13 1 5·tJ 1//S5 II-IN IX
2 .fi11.,u _ 2"5" 13" S . 1/ 1 /2 I () 1 /-itJ
3 lrt/IJ -2" _ _ Ls-·/S--11 1 J2l{() I;;'-IAJ
4 MiN ~s~ 13-ILl, 11 liJ5'O 12 ... l/J
x xix Ix lxlx Ix
xTil Ix
5 {VtJAJ -.3/ 1:g'/LI·n 1/l/30 12-w )( I I \ \ X r Ix:
6 ~_t,.5:.. 13-/S'-IJ IJ2J() I I-lAJ x
7 ~ ~IL ~1...CA.
e ?(6 rtr) fu~ ., -
10
Custody RlicoiWd by (pri!itj;
Sample Origin
State: lA-r
EPA/State Compliance:
Yes ~ No 0
Email: Sampler: (Please Print)
~"u UtJ/J,'Aa.1J
Purchase Order: Quote/Bottle Order: .-J ..
~I R ~
"0 ~ I U III
E ::l ~ I 5
III "0 C
l5 I H
Contact ELI prior to
RUSH sample submittal
for charges and
scheduling -See
Instruction Page
Comments:
~~
Cooler 10(5):
~
ReceiplTemp
:~.a °c
On Ice: 0 N
Custody Seal
On Botile
On Cooler
Intact
Signature
Match
~ s::!I ~ cgr
nnn ~ ~ f= ~
l!!f;
©) [l:'::,-
~ ~
Y N &:
0)N
1~1~\~
F::!
DatelTIme: Sigmifurc:
Record ReeeiYVd by (print): Oalem...,; Signature:
M~STbe~------------__ --------~ ____ --__ ~~~~~~~~-. ____ ~~_------~~~~----~
Signed _ Sample Disposal: ReturntoClient __ ._, Lab Disposal: 5-rr'\\ '1.00
In certain circumstances. samples submitted to Energy Laboratories. Inc. may be subcontracted to other certified laboratories in order to complete the analysis requested.
This serves as notice of this possibility. All sub-contract data wilt be clearly notated on your analytical report "
TabG
Quality Assurance and Data Validation Tables
G-IA: Field Data QAlQC Evaluation -Quarterly Samples
Time Req'd for 2 Time Pumped Amount
Well Sample Date Casings (min) Sufficient? Conductance RPD(%) pH RPD(%) Tem( CC) RPD(%) Redox Potential (Eh)
MW-2 2/14/2011 114.77 120 Y 3849 3848 0.03 6.70 6.79 1.33 13.49 13.49 0.00 188
MW-3 2/15/2011 48.3 50.0 Y 5833 5830 0.05 6.08 6.09 0.16 14.28 14.34 0.42 293
MW-3A 2116/2011 60.9 55.0 Purged Dry 6141 6145 0.07 6.05 6.05 0.00 14.23 14.23 0.00 309
MW-5 2114/2011 193.5 200.0 Y 3192 3192 0.00 7.31 7.31 0.00 14.34 14.34 0.00 247
MW-11 2/2/2011 245.4 250.0 Y 2868 2869 0.03 7.47 7.47 0.00 13.39 13.4 0.Q7 244
MW-12 2/15/2011 131.8 115.0 Purged Dry 4265 4263 0.05 6.39 6.43 0.62 14.37 14.36 0.Q7 271
MW-14 21712011 149.9 160.0 Y 4034 4035 0.02 6.22 6.23 0.16 13.93 13.93 0.00 168
MW-18 2/15/2011 383.1 390.0 Y 3590 3591 0.03 6.26 6.27 0.16 13.78 13.77 0.07 202
MW-19 2/2112011 589.7 615.0 Y 1457 1456 0.07 6.79 6.78 0.15 14.07 14.05 0.14 281
MW-20 2/16/2011 33.3 45.0 Y 6780 6767 0.19 6.96 6.95 0.14 12.44 12.49 0.40 290
MW-22 2/8/2011 283.4 285.0 Y 6970 6960 0.14 5.57 5.58 0.18 14.08 14.07 0.07 303
MW-23 2/9/2011 113.6 110.0 Purged Dry 4006 4006 0.00 6.13 6.13 0.00 12.06 12.07 0.08 325
MW-24 2/10/2011 37.0 30.0 Purged Dry 4642 4641 0.02 5.75 5.73 0.35 13.00 13.00 0.00 301
MW-25 2/2/2 011 242.2 255.0 Y 3166 3170 0.13 6.66 6.66 0.00 13.57 13.55 0.15 314
MW-26 2/16/2011 NA 3598 NA 6.06 NA 14.55 NA
MW-27 2/9/2011 265.2 270.0 Y 1596 1597 0.06 6.70 6.71 0.15 14.27 14.26 0.Q7 304
MW-28 2114/2011 197.8 200.0 Y 4071 4071 0.00 5.71 5.70 0.18 14.23 14.23 0.00 214
MW-30 2/1/2011 202.8 205.0 Y 2023 2023 0.00 6.93 6.96 0.43 13.34 13.35 0.Q7 307
MW-31 21112011 369.6 375.0 Y 1766 1773 0.40 7.22 7.21 0.14 12.91 12.89 0.16 379
MW-32 2/9/2011 338.4 340.0 Y 4052 4059 0.17 6.00 5.99 0.17 13.86 13.85 0.07 77
MW-34* 2116/2011 NA NA Y 4325 4312 0.30 6.54 6.49 0.77 13.31 13.32 0.08 261
MW-35 2/15/2011 0.9 0.4 Purged Dry 3296 NA 7.17 NA 11.41 NA
* Due to the low volume of water a pump will not work in this well. The well was bailed with a disposable bailer and 7 gallons of water were purged. One casing volume was 0.953 gallons, therefore, the purge volume was sufficient and
parameters were stable.
MW-26 is a continuously pumped well.
Purged dry
187
292
310
245
240
270
166
200
283
290
303
325
302
313
311
304
213
307
379
76
267
330
RPD(%) Turbidi y (NTU)
0.53 0 0
0.34 0 0
0.32 0.5 0.5
0.81 16.2 16.1
1.65 0 0
0.37 7.9 7.9
1.20 0 0
1.00 1 1
0.71 5.1 5.1
0.00 7.3 7.5
0.00 4.4 4.3
0.00 1.7 1.6
0.33 1.2 1.2
0.32 0 0
NA 0
0.00 0 0
0.47 0 0
0.00 0 0
0.00 0 0
1.31 8.7 8.6
2.27 112.1 107.1
NA 119.8
The QAP states that turbidity should be less than 5 Nephelometric Turbidity Units ("NTU") prior to sampling unless the well is characterized by water that has a higher turbidity. The QAP does not require that turbidity measurements be less than 5 NTU prior to sampling. As such, the noted
observations regarding turbidity measurements less than 5 NTU are included for information purposes only.
>5NTU RPD(%)
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y 0.62
N 0.00
Y 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y 0.00
Y 2.70
N 2.30
N 6.06
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
N 0.00
Y 1.16
Y 4.56
N NA
G-IB: Field Data QAlQC Evaluation -Acelerated Samples
Time Req'd for 2 Time Pumped Amount
Well Sample Date Casings (min) Sufficient? Conductance RPD(%) pJl RPD("/..) Temp Cc) RPD(%) Redox Potential (Eh) RPD(%) Turbidity (NTU) <5 (NTU) RPD(%)
Accelerated July Monthly
MW-ll 1/1112011 243 .1 245.0 Y 3003 3002 0.03 7.43 7.43 0.00 13.91 13.91 0.00 206 204 0.98 0.7 0.7 Y 0.00
MW-14 111112011 147.8 168.0 Y 4057 4064 0.17 6.37 6.37 0.00 13.55 13.54 0.07 342 341 0.29 0.7 0.7 Y 0.00
MW-25 111112011 240.1 245.0 Y 3354 3353 0.17 6.43 6.44 0.16 13.78 13.77 0.07 260 260 0.00 0.9 0.9 Y 0.00
MW-26 1112/2011 NA 3614 NA 6.83 NA 14.32 NA 273 NA 0 Y NA
MW-30 1110/2011 200.7 205.0 Y 2143 2143 0.00 6.67 6.65 0.30 13.9 13.91 0.07 291 291 0.00 0 0 y 0.00
MW-31 1110/2011 366.2 375.0 Y 1867 1869 0.11 6.59 6.65 0.91 13.61 13.56 0.37 332 332 0.00 1.9 1.9 Y 0.00
Accelerated Au ust Monthl
MW-ll 3/15/2011 245.0 250.0 Y 2720 2714 0.22 7.95 7.94 0.13 14.82 14.8 0.14 104 103 0.97 0 0 y 0.00
MW-14 311412011 149.0 150.0 Y 3903 3903 0.00 6.76 6.76 0.00 14.45 14.45 0.00 383 375 2.11 0 0 y 0.00
MW-25 311512011 241.9 250.0 Y 3207 3207 0.00 6.8 6.79 0.15 14.57 14.56 0.07 254 252 0.79 0 0 y 0.00
MW-26 3/1512011 NA 3465 NA 6.89 NA 16.02 NA 237 NA 0 Y NA
MW-30 3114/2011 198.7 200.0 Y 2054 2057 0.15 7.09 7.1 0.14 14.47 14.47 0.00 268 264 1.50 0 0 y 0.00
MW-31 3/1412011 367.8 370.0 Y 1796 1800 0.22 7.52 7.48 0.53 14.61 14.6 0.07 367 362 1.37 0 0 y 0.00
MW-26 is a continuously pumped well.
Table G-2 Holding Time Check
All quarterly and accelerated analytes met the QAP required holding times.
G-3A: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check -Quarterly Samples
Sample Batch Wells in Batch Temperature
A W AL -1102080 MW-ll, MW-25, MW-30, MW-31 3.8 DC
AWAL-1102168 MW-14, MW-22, MW-65 2.4 DC
AWAL-II02272 MW-20, MW-26, MW-34, MW-35, 3.3 DC MW-60, MW-35R
EL -CII020163 MW-14, MW-22, MW-24, MW-27, 2 DC MW-32, MW-65
EL -CII020352 MW-ll, MW-14, MW-22, MW-25 2 DC
MW-2, MW-3, MW-3A, MW-5, MW-
EL -Cl1020544 12, MW-18, MW-20, MW-26,MW-2 DC 28, MW-34, MW-35, MW-35R, MW-
60 MW-70
G-3B: Laboratory Receipt Temperature Check -Accelerated Samples
Sample Batch Wells in Batch Temperature
January Monthly Accelerated
EL -CII0I0389 MW-ll, MW-25, MW-26, MW-30, MW-31, 3°C
MW-65
AWAL -1101179 MW-ll 4.4 -C
March Monthly Accelerated
AWAL -1103272 MW-11 2.3°C
EL -CI0081016 MW-ll, MW-25, MW-26, MW-30, MW-31, 3 °e
MW-65
G-4A: Analytical Metbod Cbeck -Quarterly Samples
Parameter QAPMelbod Metbod Used bv Lab
Ammonia (as N) A4500-NH3 G A4500-NH3 G
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) E353.2 E353.2
Metals except Iron E200.8 E200.8
Iron E200.7 E200.7
Gross Alpha E900.1 E900.l
VOCs except TetrahY9rofuran SW8260B SW8260B
Tetrahvdrofuran SW8260C SW8260C
Chloride A4500-CI B A4500-CI B
Fluoride A4500-F C A4500-FC
Sulfate A4500-S04 E A4500-S04 E
TDS A2540 C A2540 C
Carbonate as C03, Bicarbonate as HC03 A2320 B A2320 B
Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium E200.7 E200.7
Tetrahydrofuran was analyzed by American West Analytical Laboratories. All other constituents were analyzed by Energy Laboratories,
G·4B: Analytical Method Check· Accelerated Samples
Parameter OAPMclhod Methoil Ujed bv Lab
Nitratc ~ Nitrite (as N) 853.2 E353.2
Manganese. Uranium, Selenium E200.8 13200.8
Gross Alpha E900.1. £900.1
VOCs exccpt Tctrahydrofuran SW8260B SW8260B
Tetrahydrofuran SW8260C SW8260.C
Chloride A4500·CIO A4500·CI B
IDS A2540C A2540C
Tc.rahyd,ofunm wu .n.ly><:d by Anlcri",," Wes. AllIlytLc.1 Loboruonc<. All o[h ... ct>",tI[u.~ ,,'\:tc anoJytt<! by Enc'l!Y Lobo'IUO".,..
Table G-5 Reporting Limit Check
All quarterly and accelerated analytes were reported to the QAP required RLs unless a dilution was required for
matrix interference or sample concentration.
G-6A: Trip Blank Evaluation -Quarterly Samples
All trip blanks for the quarterly samples were nondetect.
Blal1k Sample Date Laboratory
1 211120 II American West Analytical Laboratories
2 2/7120 [1 American West Analytical Laboratories
3 2/J4/2011 American West Analytical Laboratories
4 2/2/2011 Energy Laboratories
5 217120 I I Energy Laboratories
6 2/16/2011 Energy Laboratories
G-6B: Trip Blank Evaluation -Accelerated Samples
All trip blanks for the Accelerated samples were non detect.
Blank Sample Date Laboratory
1 1112/2011 Energy Laboratories
2 1111 /2011 American West Analytical Laboratories
3 311 512011 Energy Laboratori.es
4 311 5/2011 American West Analytical Laboratories
G-7 A: QAlQC Evaluation for Quarterly Sample Duplicates
Constituent MW-22
Ammonia (as N) 0.13
Nitrate + Nitrite (as N) 2.5
Beryllium 2.31
Cadmium 85
Cobalt 267
Manganese 28600
Molybdenum 719
Nickel 130
Selenium 12
Thallium 1.12
Uranium 44.4
Zinc 511
Chloride (mg/L) 57
Field pH (S.U.) 5.58
Fluoride (Mg/L) 3.09
Lab pH (S .U.) 6.35
Sulfate (mg/L) 4490
TDS CroglL) 6800
Bicarbonate as HC03 565
Calcium 440
Magnesium 803
Potassium 21.5
Sodium 258
Radiologic Duplicate Tests
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U MDC
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U*
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Precision (±)
Constituent
Thallium
Field pH (S.u.)
Sulfate (mg/L)
TDS (mg/L)
Only analytes whlch reported detections for both the parent
sample and the duplicate are shown.
0.6
9.5
1.1
MW-18
3.49
6.27
1770
3250
MW-65 %RPD
0.11 16.67
2.4 4.08
2.16 6.71
83.2 2.14
267 0.00
28100 1.76
708 1.54
128 1.55
13.6 12.50
1.01 10.33
41.7 6.27
500 2.18
59 3.45
5.58 0.00
3.15 1.92
6.65 4.62
4870 8.12
6630 2.53
567 0.35
430 2.30
847 5.33
20.9 2.83
255 1.17
0.6 0.00
9.1 0.257
1.1
MW-70 %RPD
3.54 1.42
6.27 0.00
1610 9.47
3180 2.18
* Duplicate checks reported for gross alpha are not %RPD. Calculated values are based on the
formula in the approved QAP.
G-7B: QAlQC Evaluation for Accelerated Sample Duplicates
MW-25 MW-65
Constituent (1/11/11) (1/11111) %RPD
Uranium 7.02 6.94 1.15
MW-25 MW-65
COD$titUeilt (3/15/11 ) (3/15/11) %RPD
Uranium 6.8 6.8 0.00
Only analytes with detections are shown.
G-8A: Radiologies Counting Error for Quarterly Samples
Gross Alpha Counting
Gross Alpha minus Rn & U Error:=; Within
Well Sample Date minus Rn & U Precision (±) 20% GWCL GWCL?
MW-2 MW2 2/14/2011 1.1 0.1 Y 3.2 Y
MW-l1 MW 11 2/2/2011 0.1 0.06 N 3.75 Y
MW-14 MW14 21712011 0.4 0.09 N 7.5 Y
MW-20 MW20 2116/2011 0.6 0.1 Y NA
MW-22 MW22 2/8/2011 9.5 1.1 Y NA
MW-25 MW25 2/2/2011 0.6 0.09 Y 7.5 Y
MW-26 MW26 2116/2011 3 0.2 Y 4.69 Y
MW-27 MW27 2/9/2011 0.7 0.1 Y 2 Y
MW-30 MW30 2/1/2011 0.2 0.07 N 3.75 Y
MW-31 MW31 2/1/2011 0.4 0.08 Y 7.5 Y
MW-32 MW32 2/9/2011 1.5 0.2 Y 3.33 Y
MW-34 MW34 2116/2011 0.5 0.1 Y NA
MW-35 MW35 2115/2011 2.6 0.2 Y NA
MW-65 MW65 2/8/2011 9.1 1.1 Y NA
Groundwater concentration levels have not been established for MW-20, MW-22, MW-34, and MW-35.
G-8B: Radiologics Counting Error for Accelerated Samples
Gross Alpha Counting
Gross Alpha minusRn & U Error ~ Within
Well Sample Date mi nus Rn & U Precision (±) 20% GWCL GWCL?
MW-26 MW26 Not Sampled·
MW-26 MW26 3/15/2011 2.7 0.2 Y 4.69 Y
• The Q4 2010 analysis for gross alpha in MW-26 was re--analyzed due to an analytical laboratory issue. Final analytical data from the Q4 2010
were received in February 2011. Accelerated sampling for MW-26 began in March 2011.
G-9A: Laboratory Matrix QC
M S 'k 0/1 R atrIX ;pL e 0 . ecove'l C ompanson
MSD
Lab Report Well Analyte MS%REC %REC RECRange RPD
CII020163 MW-ll Tin 61 74 70 -130 20
CII020544 MW-20 Uranium NC NC 70 -130 NC
CI1020544 MW-3 Silver 69 70 70 -130 1.4
CII020352 MW-24 Manganese NC NC 70 -130 NC
Cll020352 NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 118 134 70 -130 12
NA = MS samples were not Demson samples.
NC = Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike level.
Method Blank Detections
QAP
WeWSamp Reported Required
Lab Report Ie Analyte Concentration RL
Cll020352 NA Tin O.3ugIL 100 ugIL
Cll020352 NA Uranium 0.02 ugiL 0.3 ugIL
CII020352 NA Zinc 3ugIL 10 ugiL
Cll020352 NA Nitrate 0.07 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
CII020352 NA Bicarbonate as HC03 2 mgIL I mglL
CI1020352 NA Sulfate I mgIL I mglL
CII020352 NA Sulfate 2mgIL I mg/L
Cll020352 NA Iron 2ugIL 30 ugIL
CI1020352 NA Sodium 0.5 mgIL 0.5 mgIL
ClI020544 NA Fluoride 0.02 mgll 0.1 mgIL
CI1020544 NA Sulfate 0.8 mg/L 1.0mgIL
CII020544 NA Iron 2.0 ug/L 30.0 ug/L
CII020544 NA Sodium 0.5 mg/L 0.5 mgIL
CI1020544 NA Arsenic 0.2 ugiL 5.0 ug/L
CII020544 NA Beryllium 0.1 ug/L 0.5 ugIL
Cll020544 NA Cadmium 0.06 ug/L 0.5 ugIL
CII020544 NA Selenium 0.9 ugIL 5.0 ugIL
ClI020163 NA Fluoride 0.02 mgIL 0.1 mgIL
CI1020163 NA Copper 0.008 ugIL 10 ugll
CII020163 NA Lead 0.05 ugIL 1.0 ug/l
CI1020163 NA Manganese 0.10 ugIL 10 ugIL
CII020163 NA Mercury 0.04 ugIL 0.5 ugIL
CII020163 NA Molybdenum 0.3 ug?1 10 ugIL
CI1020163 NA Tin 0.80 ugIL 100 ugIL
CI1020163 NA Uranium 0.02 ug/L 0.3 ug/L
CI1020163 NA Zinc 3.0 ug/L 10 ug/L
G-9B: Accelerated Laboratory Matrix QC
Matrix Spike % Recovery Com ~arison
MSD
Lab Report Well Analyte MS%REC %REC RECRange RPD
Cll030538 NA Uranium NC NC 70 -130 NC
NA = MS samples were not Demson samples.
NC = Recovery was not calculated as the analyte level in the sample was greater than 4 times the spike level.
S ~ R urrogate 00 ecovery
Lab
Specified
Surrogate REC QAP Required
Lab Report Well/Sample Analyte %REC Range Range
C11030538 Trip Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4 121 80 -120 None
Method Blank detections
QAP
Reported Required
Lab Report Well/Sample Analyte Concentration RL
Cl1010389 NA Selenium 0.2 ug/L 5.0 ug/L
Cl1030538 NA Selenium O.4ug/L 5.0 ugIL
G-IO Rinsate Evaluation
Rinsate Sample Parameter Rinsate Result Sample Result for Well
MW-35R Bicarbonate 4 mg L MW-35 266
MW-35R Nitrate 0.1 m L MW-35 0.3
MW-35R Sulfate 1 m' L MW-35 1140
MW-35 R Iron 55 mgIL MW-35 188
PrevIOus well sampled IS the welllhat the pump was used 10 purge prtor to the rtnsate sample.
D = Reporting limit raised due to dilution/sample matrix.
m~L
m~ L
m~ L
mgIL
Qualifier
D
TabH
Kriged Current Quarterly Groundwater Contour Map and Depth Data
/I
((
\1
1\ #
\ ~..;::::--. ~ = ::::::t--
&~ b ~ ~r
# " ,I
I' I ~II
1,
:' II
"
" 11 32
II
I' ,I
II
I' II
II
II
II
• M~'21
\ \ \ \ \, ~~ ~s.,60 MW·20 .5457 N ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~" -
o
MW·22
.5450
SCALE IN FEET
EXPLANADON
perched monitoring well showing
elevation in feet amsl
~..... --=--=--~-=--~,
3000
MW-01 .5582
MW·18 .s583
~ //' -=--=--~-:;:::,~ --=.-=---=--
~11 TVVN-1~ 1 ~1 ~ ~
f:j67..0 1
05586
TVVN-10
~12
~/
/.1-.:::::====-
-----------55
~60
M~50 "" // //
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
// 0 5555
PIEZ-1
Q 5593
temporary perched monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl
perched piezometer showing
elevation in feet amsl
NOTE: MW-4, MW-26, TW4-4, TW4-19 and TW4-20 are pumping wells
TWN-4 <> 5604
TW4-26
~5537
temporary perched nitrate monitoring well
showing elevation in feet amsl KRIGED 1st QUARTER, 2011 WATER LEVELS
WHITE MESA SITE
,
~
IJ
(
~
'"
MW-34
-¢-5492
temporary perched monitoring well installed
May, 2010 showing elevation in feet amsl
perched monitoring well installed
August/September, 2010
HYDRO
GEO
CHEM,INC-APPROVED DATE flEFERENCE FIGURE
showing elevation in feet amsl SJS Q1 2011 H:J718000/may11/w10211.srf H-1
Tab I
Groundwater Time Concentration Plots
20
~ 15 oa .§.
II 'U 'I: 0 is 10
5
0.4
~ oa .§.
II 0.3 ~ 0 = u::
0.2
Time concentration plots for MW-1
Chloride in MW-1
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-1
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Oetecte(l Values
• Non-Detected Values
~~
Intc=lA
~ ~
::;
t;a .s .. ... ~ ::0 III
::;
}
E ::0 'c I! :::l
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
;> ,>"'~
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
c:",OJ
0
Time concentration plots for MW-1
Sulfate in MW-l
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-l
I' ,J ~ J V V ~, \.[\ l ~ ~ ...... ---
.:",,,, ~ ,f'><:J ~",,,, ",'" ,ft f:j'" .,'" ,.;...,<:,
~q .,'O<i ~'O !$ '>~ <! ~,.-l:, ~~ ,>'0 <;:J" ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report • Detected Values
1st Quarter 2011 • Non-Detecl~ Values
Time concentration plots for MW-2
Chloride in MW-2
20
::i' 15 iia .§.
GI .., -;: R J:. 10 u
5
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-2
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
::i' 0.3 iia .§.
GI 0.25 .., .;:
CI :> 0.2 u::
/I
if\ / A.I ~ ~
I' • ~ J
V"
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
",'" ",'0 .:oP ~o,'" Pi-"p~ ~", ~ ,,;$' .: ">,,,<:f ~ G 5f "?-~ ~'" ,,?-.;s ..,'" ..,.;s <:)'" ..,.;s ~o
-:I'" .: 0"
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report • Detected Values
1st Quarter 2011 • Non-Detect..d Values
Time concentration plots for MW-2
Sulfate in MW-2
2500
2000 1----------t:~~~~".-~~--~.---------------------~~ .. ~-6
::; o:a 1500
.§. .. ... ~ :::I 1000 II>
500 -.~--------------------------------------------------------~
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-2
20
18
~
16
14
::; 12 }
E 10 :::I 'c ~ 8 ;:)
Ie ~ ~ f\
II I, ".X
~ , \1 -"
6
4
~ J
A \ /
If \ \/
~ V o
.:'0'" <0'0 ,p,<:; ~o,'" <fio ..,c§' ~", ~ ,.,:-.<:;
'?-~ ,->",<i ~'Ii § ,>" "," r;!
'?-" ,>'Ii ~ .... " ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report • Detected Values
1st Quarter 2011 • Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
::;-50 oa .§.
II 40 :2 ... ..2 .J::. I.J 30
20
10
0
",'b<:> \~
0.8
::;-oa .§.
II 0.6 ... . r:
0 :::I ..:
0.4
0.2
'b'" ~ ~o
Time concentration plots for MW-3
Chloride in MW-3
9i-.: ".0.
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-3
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Delecte(i Values
• Non-Detected Values
4500
4000
3500
3000
::;
"ba 2500 .§.
B ~ 2000
'" III
1500
1000
500
0
~c§>
.... '"
80
70
60
::; 50
"ba .::
E 40 '" '" ~ ::::l 30
20
10
0
,\OJ
I:f 0
/:'b'" ~~
Time concentration plots for MW·3
Sulfate in MW-3
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-3
~Io c,"'~' ,p,~ ~OJ'" ~'1 ~ ~'" ~<S .... '"
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
:;-
"iia .§.
II ~ .2 .c c.J
:;-"iia E-
li "CI 'C 0 " ii:
Time concentration plots for MW-3A
Chloride in MW-3A
80
70
~ ~ ..-.... 60 '-..,/' V "'-/' 50
40
30
20
10
0
~'" \,,<'
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
~'" ~ \,,<' ,<'"
...
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-3A
!:)'o .,,,,~ s-,-,i' '{o<l ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detecte(l Values
• Non·Detect<!d Values
::;
~ .§.
OJ ... ~ :::I III
::; -~
E :::I ·c I! ::I
Time concentration plots for MW-3A
Sulfate in MW-3A
3900
3800
3700
3600
3500
3400
3300
3200 .. ~----~-----.------~----~-----.------r-----~-----.------
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
o
",,<:>'?
.... '"
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-3A
"'-.
/ ~
~~ ~o
~ ""\.
~ ......
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
_J
• Detected Values
• Non·Oetecll!d Value5
:=-'& tE§
IntiC:rA ~=~
::;
Oil .§. .. ~ ·c .2 ..r::. u
::; -.. .§. .. :2 (; .. i.:
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
",<§' 'b'" " .J:o'" 0"
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2 t
0.8
0.6 l
0.4
0.2
o
Time concentration plots for MW·5
Chloride in MW-S
~ ,,01
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-S
.It
/ -..N
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
~ .., '"","
• Detected Valuf!s
• NDn·o..tecled Values
~~
Inti:=t.l
;;;s.!: ~
Time concentration plots for MW-5
Sulfate in MW-S
1600
1400
1200
~ 1000
"Oa oS 800 :l ~ ,.
11\ 600
400
200
0
",<§> .g, ~ " ,,01 ~'" 0"
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-S
7
6 t-----------------------------------------------~
~ 5 t-----------------------------------------------~
}
§ 4 t-------------------------------------------------------~
'c e
::J 3
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
45
40
35
30
~ "Oa 25 g ... ~ 20 .5Z .c u
15
10
5
0
'tJ'\, ,,;
<;)"
1.2
1
0.8
~ "Oa g ... 0.6 ~ 0 :::0 u::
0.4
0.2
o
'tJ'a !:< ..,<i
Time concentration plots for MW-11
Chloride in MW-ll
,,;q,o,
<;;>"
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-ll
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
~ 11
!~'~
• I;letectell Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-11
Sulfate in MW-11
1400
1000
~ oa 800
.§.
B "' :I:: 600 = 11\
400
200 •
0
~'1, ~'" ~o, <: ~ <: <;)'" .... .:s <;)<zi
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-ll
8
7
6 t----------------------------------------------------I
~ 5
~ E 4 = 'c I! ~ 3
2
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detl!cte(i Values
• Non-Detected Values
90
80
70
60
::r ~ 50
-8 ·c 40 ,g .c u
30
20
10
0
..:~ ~,.
2.5
2
::r 1.5 Oa .§.
OJ ~ 0 " i:i:
0.5
o
'0'0
,,01
Time concentration plots for MW-12
,if ~o
Chloride in MW-12
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-12
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
..... --rr ~
• Demcte(l Values
• Non-Detected Value!>
-:;--.a .s.
!l £ :::s III
-:;-~
E :::s '2
f! :l
Time concentration plots for MW-12
Sulfate in MW-12
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
o +---~----~----~---T----~----~---T----~--~----~
20
15
10
5
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-12
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• l;letected Values
• Non-Detected Value!;
::;
Iia .5. .. ~ .2 .r. u
::;
Iia .5. .. "0 .;:
0 ::I u::
Time concentration plots for MW·14
Chloride in MW-14
30
25
20
15
10
5
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-14
0.25 r ------------------------------.
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Valug
• Non-Detected Values
~ ~ .§.
II Jg = III
~ }
e = "2 I! :::l
Time concentration plots for MW-14
Sulfate in MW-14
2500
1500
1000
500
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-14
120
100
80
60
40
20
o +-----~----r---~r----,----~----_r----_.----,_----~----r_----I
('f'bOJ
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detl!cte(i V~lues
• Non-Detected Values
~~
Inte=tA
~ mil=
::;
Ii3 .§.
II ~ .2 ~ u
::;
Ii3 .§.
OJ ~ 0 ::I ii:
60
50
40
30
20
10
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
a
",cf' ~ <;)"'v ~'1>
Time concentration plots for MW-15
Chloride in MW-1S
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-1S
~
s;:,"-? s)'> ~
"t''''fJ <! \~ "t'~ <;)'"
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
.:,g>
~'1>
~...,,<:>
~o
• Detect_II Valu6
• Non-Detectt!d Values
:::i" "Oa .§.
:! ~ ,.
'"
:::i"
}
E ,. 'r: I! :::J
Time concentration plots for MW-15
Sulfate in MW-1S
3000 r-------------------------------------------------------------~
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
o
70
60
50
30
20
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-1S
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::i Oa .§.
ell ~ ~ .I:. U
::i Oa .§.
ell :2 ~ ..2 "-
Time concentration plots for MW-17
Chloride in MW-17
60
30
20
10
a ~--~ __ --~----~----~----~--~----~----~----I
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
....... --
a
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-17
-~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
~ ....
• Detecte(l Values
• Non-Detected Values
2500
'j
'Qa 2000
.§.
!! :l! 1500 ,.
'"
1000
500
50
45
40
35
'j 30 }
E 25 ,.
C I! 20 ::J
15
10
5
0
1:0,'" ~'Ij
1:0,<'
~'Ij
Time concentration plots for MW-17
Sulfate in MW-17
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-17
1:';;' '?Jo,
~'Ij '<~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Value,;
80
70
60
:::i' 50
IilI .§.
II ~ 40
~ .s::. U 30
20
10
0
.:",,,,
~ .. ,Y'J" ~,.
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35 ~
:::i' 0.3 IilI .§.
II 0.25 "D ·c Q ::I 0.2 ;:;:
0.15
0.1
0.05
o
Time concentration plots for MW-18
Chloride in MW-18
~ 9)'" ",<1 :<$ ",0;
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-18
.-""1
'" ~ \ t..
\ 1~ .....
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
"'\:..----... ./ .....
• Detectell Values
• Non-Detected Valul!5
~ 'iia .5.
II .. :l!l ,.
""
~ .... .=:
E ,. ·2 I! ::J
Time concentration plots for MW·18
Sulfate in MW-18
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
o +---~~---r----~----~--~----~----~--~----~
60
50
40
30
20
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-18
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• l)etreted Values
• Non-Detectrd Values
::J' Da .§.
II ~ R ~ u
::J' Da .§.
II "Q ·c Q ::I ..:
Time concentration plots for MW-19
Chloride in MW-19
120 r-----------------------------------------------------------~
100
80
60
40
20
o
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
a
,,~ ~'Ii ~t§>
't"V
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-19
,,~ r.: ,,'" ~~. r;f~ ,,'>
(f Q'" \V 0
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-[)etect~ Valu ....
Time concentration plots for MWM19
Sulfate in MW-19
3000
2500
2000
::; ~ .§. 1500 ,!
~ = '" 1000
500
o -.~----~----~----~-----'------r-----~----.r-----r----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-19
30
25
20 i-----------------~L-------~~-------------------------I
::;
}
e 15 = '2 I! :J
10
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• I)e~cted Values
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
:J' 50
~
II 40 :2 .. J! J:. U 30
20
10
0
!'>'" c; ~'"
0.4
0.35
0.3
:J' 0.25
~
f o ,.
0.2
It 0.15
0.1
0.05
o
,......
Time concentration plots for MW-20
Chloride in MW-20
!'>'" ,;l:l
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-20
... ./
JIll"
./ -
~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Oetec~d Values
• Non-Detecb!d Values
4500
4000
3500
3000
::i' l 2500
S 4! 2000 .. III
1500
1000
500
0
!:l'b ~ ..,.-;
40
35
30
::i' 25
~
E 20 .. C ~ ::::I 15
10
5
0
9P' c: <:I'"
l'l'" "eq
Time concentration plots for MW-20
Sulfate in MW-20
~ ---./" -r
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-20
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
""-~
• Oetected Values
• NDn-Detected Values
80
70
60
::l' so
~ ,.-
III 40 :5! ... .!i .c U 30
20
10
0
r.:",r,.
<:;)'"
3.5
3
......
2.5
::l' O! 2 .§.
III ~ 0 1.5 :::I Li:
o
!'J<O
c.f<i
Time concentration plots for MW-22
Chloride in MW-22
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-22
-1A A. A 'V -v
__eo_ r--~ .--A ~ -...."
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
--
• i;)ete<:tell Valul!$
• Non-Detected Valul!5
~~
IntE=tA
~ ~
::r "Oa ~
OJ ... ~ '" 11\
::r }
E '" ';:
I! ;:)
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
o
60
50
40
30
20
10
Time concentration plots for MW-22
Sulfate in MW-22
~~ -.... ...............
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-22
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
~
• r;>e~cle!l Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW·23
Chloride in MW-23
12
10
8
"3 Oa .§. .. 't:I 6
'I: 0 :E u
4
o ~----~--~----~----,-----~--~----~----~--~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-23
2,5
2
"3 1.5 -.. .§. .. 't:I 'I: 0 :s i:i:
0,5
~~ ...... ~
o
):)" ~'o ~'o ~ ~ ~ s;,o, ):)0, 1:0$-~ ,;;:,<:-,,09 <,,,,<1 " ~o"" 'l'q, ,,~ <,,,,q, ,,: ..,~ 'l'q, ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report • Detected Value<
1st Quarter 2011 • Non-Detected Value"
3000
2500
2000
::r ba .§. 1500 S ~ '" 11\
1000
500 .
o
35
30
25
::r } 20
E '" 'c 15 I! :l
10
5
0
Sl"
.,'1.<1
/,'0
t:r9-
Time concentration plots for MW·23
Sulfate in MW-Z3
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-Z3
".¢P ~ ~ ~o "><:>
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter ZOl1
• r:>etected V .. lul$
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
::; 50
~ .§. ~
II 'a 40
'1: 0 :E u 30
20
10
o
0.4
0.35
0.3
::; 0.25
~ .§.
II 0.2 ~ 0 '" li: 0.15
0.1
0.05
0
1:)<>
~ \;;
5:>'0
"OJ'
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Chloride in MW-24
~ ----" ~ ..
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-24
1:)'0 i' ,.~ .,e':l ~q ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Delecte\l Value5
• Non·Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-24
Sulfate in MW-24
3500
3000
2500
~ 'Oa 2000 -
E-
li .. ~ 1500 = III
1000
500
o i-----r---~----~----~----~----~--~~--~----~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-24
14
12
10
~ -8 ~
E = ·c 6 I! ~
4
2
.A
\ ~
\
\ I
.~ -""" ~ ~ l--.---0
5:)<' ~<:J'o ~ ~ !b 5:)'lJ <:J'" \f~ ,,:.,,><:J ~,,><:J ..; ,,-' <:Je ,>'" ~ so 'o.,<i !: ... '" .,..:s ~'" ~'" ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report • Detecte(i Values
1st Quarter 2011 • Non-Detected Values
40
35 ~
30
~ 25
~ .§. .. "0 20
';: .5! .I:. u 15
10
5
o
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
~ 'iia 0.25 .§. .. "0 ';: 0.2 0 '" ;:;:
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
!:l" ~ )~
Time concentration plots for MW-25
Chloride in MW-2S
A ~---J ...... .... " .-..
!:l'o '<~
V
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-2S
!:l'" ~ &-c.,eQ.· ~ .. ", G
<;)'"
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Dete~te(l Values
• Non-Detected Values
i
i
2500
2000
~ 1000
Time concentration plots for MW-25
Sulfate in MW-2S
500 1------------------------------1
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-2S
8
7
~ A A... ~ ~r-\/ ..... V~ ... -~ ... ""' -. 6
~ 5
~ E 4 '" 'c ~ ::l 3
2
1
o
~ ~ ~'b Il' !,',,>I:J !,',,>"> \~<:' ~."", ~1f. 't-<:i ~<:i ~."
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report •
1st Quarter 2011 •
I)e~cte<l Values
Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW·26
Chloride in MW-26
90
80
70
60
~ ~ 50 .5-
• J\ A/\
""" ..... -,-vv '7\/. ~ lill 1] .. • • .. :g 40 0 :E u
30
20
10
o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-26
2.5
2
~ 1,5 -.. .5-.. 'a 'i:
0 :::s 1 u::
0.5
~~ ..... ...... -. --.....
o
Sl'" ~", ~~ ~~., r;:,'o ~ ~'t> l' ~-$' ~'>
<,,,,<1 ~ ~ ~'I;.:(, ~ 'l-oS ,,'" "oS ,,'" '1-<1 "1-<1 ~'I; ,,01
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report • r;>etected Values
1st Quarter 2011 • Non-Detected Value];
::; -.a .5. .. ...
411 ::J 11'1
Time concentration plots for MW-26
Sulfate in MW-26
2500
2000
1500
1000
500 t-------------------------------------------------------------~
o +---~~--~----,_----~--~----_r----~--~~---I
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-26
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Delecte(i ValUe<;
• Non-Detected ValUe<;
50
45
40
35
:::;-30 l
II 25 ~ .2 .I:: 20 u
15
10
5
o
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
:::;-
Iia 0.5 E-
li ~ '': 0.4 0 ::I ;:;:
0.3
0.2
0.1
o
Time concentration plots for MW·27
Chloride in MW-27
----J\ r-/
JI--..r V
i"""'" ................ 'W'"
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-27
....
/\~ \~-~~ •
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
" ---
• Non·Detected Values
~ ~
II .. ~ ::I 11'1
~ }
E ::I 'c I!! :::l
Time concentration plots for MW-27
Sulfate in MW-27
600
500
400
300
200
100
o ~--~~--~----~----~--~----~----~----~--~
40
35
30 l/\ --.
25
20
15
10
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-27
~ ~ ~ ....
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
A .... ~
• Detected Values
• Non·Detected Values
120
100
80
:::;
~
OJ ~ 60
0 is
40
20
0.8
0.7
0.6
:::; 0.5 .. .§.
OJ 0.4 'C '1: 0 '" u:: 0.3
0.2
0.1
0
5l" .... v~ ~ ..,'I>~
Time concentration plots for MW·28
Chloride in MW-28
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-28
~<o
c,<li ~ 51' ,i'
~ ~o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Det .. cted V~lul!$
• Non-Detected Valul!$
2600
2550
2500
2450
::;
~ 2400 .. ...
411 2350
:::I III
2300
2250
2200
2150
~., .:r!' ">,,,q .,.Q.
Time concentration plots for MW-28
Sulfate in MW-28
~<o <So ~ ,.; ~ ~o )V )'0<:'
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-28
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
::;
iia .§.
III ~ ,.S!
.J:. 1.1
::;
iia .§.
III 'C ·c 0 '" u::
Time concentration plots for MW-29
Chloride in MW-29
45
40
35
30
A
-V~ .......... --.. / --'" ~/
"'"'
25
20
15
10
5
o
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-29
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
o ~--~----~----~----~--~ __ --~----~----~--~
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detecte(l Values
• Non·Detec~ Values
3000
2950
2900
:::;-
! 2850
:l 4! 2800 .. III
2750
2700
2650
16
14
12
:::;-10
~
E 8 .. C e :::l 6
4
2
o
Time concentration plots for MW-29
Sulfate in MW-29
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-29
-'" /" ~ ~ ---------.. -.-
/ 'fI
p
...,'"
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detecte(i Values
• Non-Detected Values
160
140
.......
120 r--
~ 100
~ .. 80 ~ .2 .c u 60
40
20
o
0.6
0.5
0.4
~ tia .§. .. 0.3 ... ·c 0 ,. u::
0.2
0.1
o
Time concentration plots for MW-30
--.....
Chloride in MW-30
-----~ A. .,.. --~
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-30
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
Al ~ .. \1\/ -r
• Detecte<l Values
• Non·Dete~ted Valu ....
::r l
II ... !l! .. III
Time concentration plots for MW-30
Sulfate in MW-30
1200
1000
800
v---A .... ~ ----........... -~ ~--V
600
400
200
a
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-30
9
/\ -rc... --'"'
8
II y ~ .... -... ...... --" 7
3
a
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• De~cted Values
• Non-Detected lIalues
160
140
120
=-100
} .. 80 l! ..
.5l .c 1.1 60
40
20
o
2.5
=-1.5 Iia E. .. ... "I: 0 :::I 1 Li: .A. ,... .....
0.5
o
Time concentration plots for MW-31
Chloride in MW-31
~
~ --....... ~
--.....
-..",
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-31
'--~ ~ ,.-
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
-...... ......
• Oetecte(l Values
• Non-Detected Values
600
500 ....
V~
400
::r ~ .§. 300 .. i ::I III
200
100
o
10
9
8
7
,./
V
::r 6 }
E 5 ::I '2 f! 4 ::J
3
2
1
o
Time concentration plots for MW-31
-
Sulfate in MW-31
.... -"\. -----/\ ------v
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-31
~ ... ~ .,...
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
... ~
--'"
-...A. ~ "
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
~
IntiC=tA
~~
=r ~ .s
II 'a .;:
0 :E U
=r Oi .s
II ~ 0 ::I ;:;:
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
~'" c.,"'~
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
o
5:>'" 'l-~-';'
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Chloride in MW-32
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-32
----..
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• NDn-Detectl!d Values
~ Ini:~~A
~~
Time concentration plots for MW-32
Sulfate in MW-32
3000
2500
2000
....... ]i... ~ ~ --'-\r-.... "Y ,...
• ::r ~ 1500 S !Ill ::I III
1000
SOD
o
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-32
6 ~----------------------------------------------~
5
i E 3 .: c I! :::l
2 ~~=------------------------------------=~~~
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected V~lues
• Non-Detected Values
80
70
60
:::; 50
"Oa .5-
II :5! 40
.2 is 30
20
10
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
:::;
"Oa .5-
II 0.3 "a .~
" ii:
0.2
0.1
0
..
-
•
Time concentration plots for MW-34
Chloride in MW-34
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-34
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
--
•
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-34
Sulfate in MW-34
2500
•
• 2000 1-----------------------------------------------~------1
l1500
I Jl 1000
500
o ~----------~----------~----------~--------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-34
30 -
25 -
20
10 t--------------------------------------------------------I
5
o
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Chloride in MW-35
80
70 ~ 60
-;; 50 ~
"iia ~ ~
f 40
oS! J:. \"I 30
20
10
0
§ ~"" ~"" <: <:;," ,,,,<:< ,,#
Sample Date
Fluoride in MW-35
OA5
0.4 .....
~ 0.35 ------.
0.3
-;;
"iia 0.25 ~
III ~ 0.2 r!l il:
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
~<:l ~'" ~'" <: <:;," 5:' ,,# \'"
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report • Detected Values
1st Quarter 2011 • Non-Detected Values
::l" iii .s
II ... ~ ::0 '"
::l" iii .s
E ::0 'c I! ::::I
Time concentration plots for MW-35
Sulfate in MW-35
2500
2000 •. r---------------~~~--------------------------------~
1500
1000
500 t-----------------------------------------------------~
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
o +-----------------------------~----------------------------r_------------------------~
Sample Date
Uranium in MW-35
Sample Date
White Mesa Uranium Mill
Groundwater Monitoring Report
1st Quarter 2011
• Detected Values
• Non-Detected Values
Tab J
CSV Transmittal Letter
Kathy Weinel
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dear Mr. Lundberg,
Kathy Weinel
Friday, May 20, 2011 12:39 PM
[e-mail]
'Phillip Goble'; David Frydenlund; Jo Ann Tischler
Transmittal of CSV Files White Mesa Mill 2011 Q1 Groundwater Monitoring
C11010389(1 ).CSV; C11020163.CSV; C11020352(1 ).CSV; C11020544.CSV;
C11030538.CSV; 11 01179-CSV EDD.csv; 11 02080-EDD-CSV.csv; 11 02168-EDD.csv;
1102272-EDD.csv; 1103272-EDD CSV.csv
Attached to this e-mail is an electronic copy of laboratory results for groundwater monitoring conducted at the White
Mesa Mill during the first quarter of 2011, in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format.
Please contact me at 303-389-4134 if you have any questions on this transmittal.
Yours Truly
Kathy Weinel
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
Quality Assurance Manager
1