Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC-2010-003481 - 0901a06880190307State ofUtah GARY R. HERBERT Govemor GREG BELL Lieutenant Governor Department of Environmental Quality Amanda Smith Executive Director DIVISION OF RADIATION CONTROL Dane L. Finerfrock Director 010 010-0034 June 3, 2010 Certified Mail (Retum Receipt Requested) Ms. Jo Ann Tischler Director, Compliance and Permitting Denison Mines (USA) Corporation (DUSA) 1050 n"'Street, Suite 950 Denver, CO 80265 Dear Ms. Tischler: SUBJECT: Denison Mines (USA) Corporation (DUSA) White Mesa Mill Facility DRC Inspection Results: Ore Storage Pad Area, Tailings Cells 1-3 DMT and Cell 4A BAT Performance Standards and Monitoring Inspection Engineering Inspection Module 75E; Report of Findings and Request for Information An inspection on the subject was held on May 4, 2010 at the DUSA mill facilities near Blanding, Utah. Messrs. Phillip Goble and David Rupp represented DRC, Messrs. Rich Bartlett, David Turk and Ryan Palmer represented DUSA that day. Later that evening, Mr. Rupp also spoke with Mr. Frydenlund of DUSA regarding item 2 below. Our fmdings and requests for infonnation are identified below: Issues Identified, Remedies Proposed and Requests for Information 1. 2. Ore Storage Pad Buffer Zone. Along the southem border of the ore storage pad area, ore-like appearing materials were noted to be in contact with the fence. The depth ofthis material in contact with the fence was about 2-feet. Mr. Bartlett of DUSA offered to remove the material that day, which was accepted by the DRC representatives. The 4-foot buffer is a current requirement of the DMT Plan, and if the current permit changes are approved, it will be a Ground Water Discharge Permit requirement as well. work. We request DUSA supply a photograph of this completed Pooling Water. Pooling water was observed up to about 50-feet in radius, surrounding the tall vanadium pregnant liquor tank and water tank east of the Mill building. Sources for the water appeared to be storm water run-on, direct precipitation and steam condensation. At our exit meeting at the White Mesa Mill Administration Office, various proposed configurations to eliminate this water pooling were discussed. However, as mentioned above, Messrs. Rupp and Frydenlund spoke about this item later that evening. It was discussed that DUSA needs to assure that the area around the tanks fully 168 North 1950 West • Salt Lalte City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144850 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4850 Telephone (801) 536-4250 • Fax (801) 533-4097 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 www.deq. Utah, gov Prinled on 100% recycled paper Ms. Jo An Tisihler June 3, 2010 Page 2 drains to Cell 1. Complete drainage to Cell 1, rather than pooling or retention of water, is a requirement of the DUSA Storm Water Best Management Practices Plan (SWBMPP). In our discussion on May 17, 2010 you agreed that this work would be completed on or prior to September 30, 2010. We acknowledged that response to this item may include required provisions for leak containment of the VPL tank. Completion of this work will be verified during the annual DUSA storm water management inspection by DRC to be conducted this fall. 3. Apparent Narrow Travel Lane on the Dike between Cells 4A and 4B. During the May 4, 2010 inspection, Messrs. Snyder and Bartlett indicated they were considering using fences and gates to contro] access to the narrow travel lane on this dike, and that only certain traffic would be allowed. No photos or measurements were taken during the inspection. Later, we expressed some concems that the total dike width may be too narrow. On May 19, 2010 Mr. Harold Roberts of DUSA telephoned with measurements, stating the dike met or exceeded the current construction width requirements. 4. Surveying of Settlement Monitors: Recommendations for Improvement. It appears there may be potential error reduction if DUSA used a more organized ledger form for collecting and reducing survey notes. Avoiding long distance survey rod readings by using tuming points, additional benchmarks or other methods could also significantly reduce errors. These actions may produce less erroneous data for the analysis, explanation, correction and resolution required in proposed new License Conditions 11.7.Eand 11.7.1. In telephone conversations with you on May 17, 2010 we discussed the items above. You committed that DUSA would fully respond to this letter within 45 days of receipt. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, David A. Rupp, P.E. Geotechnical Services Section Cc: Thomas Rushing, DRC Dean Henderson, DRC Harold Roberts, DUSA F:\drupp\DUSA\ InspeclionsVDMT&BATJ^FIl 06-IO.doc