The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDAQ-2024-0112751 DAQC-1095-24 Site ID 10123 (B5) MEMORANDUM TO: CEM FILE – HF SINCLAIR WOODS CROSS REFINING, LLC – FCCU THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager FROM: Rob Leishman, Environmental Scientist DATE: October 24, 2024 SUBJECT: Source: Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Unit 4 Contact: Matt Howes – 801-397-7412 Location: Woods Cross, Davis County, UT Test Contractor: Alliance Source Testing FRS ID#: UT0000004901100013 Permit/AO#: AO DAQE-AN101230057-23, dated November 15, 2023 Subject: Review of RA/PST Report dated June 27, 2024 On July 2, 2024, DAQ received a Relative Accuracy/Performance Specification Test (RA/PST) report for the FCCU Unit 4. Testing was performed on May 1, 2024, to determine the relative accuracy of the NOx, CO, CO2, O2, SO2, and flow monitoring systems. The DAQ-calculated test results are: RA/PST EVALUATION: FCCU Unit 4 NSPS RATA - Test Date - 5/1/2024 Primary Channel Manufacturer Serial No. Units CEM Value RM Value Relative Accuracy Status SO2 Teledyne T100H 467 ppm 0.044 0.000 0.2% Passed CO2 Teledyne T300 5404 % 14.900 15.640 5.1% Passed NOx Ametek -9900RM 9900-S1616-1 ppm 13.722 16.162 4.6% Passed O2 Ametek -9900RM 9900-S1616-1 % 1.850 2.610 36.1% Passed CO Teledyne T300 5404 ppm 95.889 84.997 3.9% Passed Volumetric Flow Rate wscfh 1036778 1075877 5.1% Passed Stack Test Deviation Report There were no deviations observed during testing. Calibration gases were in date and met performance specifications. 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 3 for O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 12. Calculate the arithmetic difference between the RM and the CEMSS output for each run. The average of the nine (of more) data sets constitute the RA. 13.2 Relative accuracy. The RA of the CEMSS must be no greater than 1 percent O2 or CO2. 1 8 2 2 DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted in this report. CONCLUSION: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC operates the continuous emissions monitor (CEM) on the FCCU Unit 4 stack to measure NOx, CO, CO2, O2, and SO2 emissions. The CEM was audited by the DAQ and found to meet quality assurance requirements found in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 1, and R307-170, Continuous Emission Monitoring System Program. Quarterly cylinder gas audits and an annual relative accuracy test audit were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in UAC R307-170. RECOMMENDATION: The HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 CEM system was operating as required in R307-170 and 40 CFR 60.13 at the time of this evaluation. HPV: No ATTACHMENTS: RATA Review Spreadsheets ,.dttFfinctorr Certified Mail: 7019 1120 0000 0070 9221 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) - unit 4 Fluid catalytic Cracking Unit HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC - Woods Cross, Davis County Enclosed please find the Relative Accuracy Test Audit Report for the continuous emission monitors on Unit 4 Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit. The test was completed on May I't,2024. The relative accuracies were calculated to be 0.84% for the 02 monitor, 8.56% for the NOx monitor,o.lgoh for the SO2 monitor, 1.96% for the CO monitor,2.38o/o for the CO2, and 5.19% for the VFR monitor. All other data required by R307-170-7(5) and 40 CFR 60 Appendix B are found in the report or this cover letter. The following apply to this report: l. Testing was conducted while the point source was operating at the rate and/or conditions specified in the applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation2. During testing, the point source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained process conditions representative of normal operations, and operated under such other relevant conditions specified by the Director. I certifu under penalties of law that, based upon reasonable inquiry of personnel involved the statements and information contained in this report are truthful and accurate, and are a complete record of all monitoring related testing events that occurred during the enclosed test audit. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Matt Howes at (801) 397-7412. Sincerely, June 27,2024 Mr. Bryce Bird, Director Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, Utah 841l6 RE: Director: T-2.+^- S, \. , .A -- - ".i-Dustin Simmonds Vice President and Refinery Manager Enclosure cc: E. Benson (r) File 2.4.1.3.2.1 -t/TAH DEPAPTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAT OUATITY JUL * ?: '.:t, l DlvlstoN oF AtR QUAL|TV HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC 1070 W. 500 S, West Bountiful, UT 84087 801 -299-6600 | HFSinclair.com t T t I t T I t I t T t I t T T I I t .ffiH"3,;?1,?t'il"fli, .iiri A lffircD*sroN oF ArR ouALrrv RATA Report HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC 1070 West 500 South West Bountiful, UT 84087 Source Tested: FCCU WGS Unit 4 Test Date: May 1,2024 Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 841 Project No. AST-2024-165 1 -00 1 Source Test Report Test Program Summary lEeFla i.J i I I AI Regulatorv Informationt t I I Permit No. Regulatory Citations Source Information DAQE-ANl0l23004l-13 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, Performance Specifications 2, 3,44' and 6 Source Name Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS) Contact Information Source ID Unit 4 Target Parameters VFR, 02, COz, SOz,NOx,C0 T I I t t I I t I I t I Test Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC 1070 West 500 South West Bountiful, UT 84087 Facility Contacts Eric Benson eric.benson@hfsinclair.com (80t) 299-6623 Matthew Howes matthew. howes@hfsinclair.com (80t) 397-7412 Test Company Alliance Technical Croup, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 Project Manager Charles Horton charles. horton@al I iancetg.com (352) 663-7s68 Field Team Leader Charles Horton charles.horton@all iancetg.com (352) 663-7s68 QA/QC Manager Kathleen Shonk katie.shonk@alliancetg.com (812) 4s2-4785 Report Coordinator Delaine Spangler delaine.spangler@alliancetg.com Report Reviewer Sarah Perry sara.perry@all iancetg.com I HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 65 l -00 l 2 of70 Page i I t I I I t I I T t t I T I t T I T AI Source Test Report Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer. To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections in the test report. This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (pdf) and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document. 611112024 rla|, ,, Charles Horton, QSTI Alliance Technical Group, LLC Date AST-2024- l 6s r -00 I 3 of70 Page ii I HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT I T I I T T I T I I T I t T I I T T All6rpe Source Test Reporl, | , i.)lr.l, ', ,,, ,,t ,ob,rorcor,rr,, TABLE OF CONTENTS l.l Process/Control System Descriptions .............. I - I 1.4 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification................... ................ l-l 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate..... 3-l 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 34, - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide......... ...... 3-l 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content......... ....................3-2 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C - Sulfur Dioxide ........3-2 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides ......3-2 3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide..... .....................3-2 3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification.. ...................3-2 3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 34, 6C, 7E and 10................ 3-3 LIST OF TABLES APPENDICES Appendix A Sample Calculations Appendix B RA and Field Data Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data Appendix D CEMS and CERMS Data AST-2024- I 65 I -00 I 4 of70 Page iii I HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT I t t I I t I I I I T t t t I T T T I 5 of70 I t Source Test Report lnlroduction t t I I I I I T T I I t I t T t 1.0 Introduction Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC (HF Sinclair) to conduct performance specification (PS) testing at the Woods Cross refinery in West Bountiful, Utah. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, PS 2, 3, 4,A. and 6 and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-AN101230041-13. Testing included conducting an initial relative accuracy test audit (RATA) to determine the relative accuracy (RA) of the oxygen (O2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) and annual RATA to determine the RA of the carbon dioxide (COz), sulfur dioxide (SOz) and carbon monoxide (CO) CEMS and the volumetric flow rate (VFR) continuous emission rate monitoring system (CERMS) serving the FCCU WGS Unit 4. l.l Process/ControlSystemDescriptions The FCCU is a stacked type of UOP technology. Reduced crude from the bottom of the crude tower is pumped to storage or straight to the FCCU. Feed is heated in an exchanger and mixed with recycled (fractionation tower bottoms) and side cut heavy gas oil. The combination is mixed with hot regenerated catalyst and is vaporized in the riser entering the bottom of the reactor. As the vapor rises to the reactor, cracking takes place with carbon deposited on the catalyst. Spent catalyst leaves the reactor through a steam stripped leg and flows to the regenerator where air is blown in and the carbon is burned off reactivating the catalyst. Cyclones in the reactor and regenerator separate catalyst from the gases and vapors. Cracked products leave the reactor and go to the fractionator where they are separated into gas, LPF, gasoline, light gas, and healy gas oil. Regenerator off-gases are ducted to a WGS for particulate matter removal before gases are vented to the atmosphere through a vertical I 99-foot-tall stack. The WGS is a control device for particulate maffer. 1.2 CEMS Descriptions Pollutant Parameter: SOz Pollutant NOx / Oz Teledyne AmetekMake: Model: Serial No.: TIOOH 467 9900RM 9900-sl6l6-r Pollutant CO / CO: Teledyne T300 5404 Flow Rate VFR Teledyne Monitor Labs Ultraflow 150 1,500,000 1.3 Project Team Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table. Table l-l: Project Team HF Sinclair Personnel Matthew Howes Alliance Personnel Charles Horton Mitchell Manwaring 1.4 Site Specific Test Plan & Notilication Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by HF Sinclair. t HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024-165 l-001 6 of70 Page l-l I I t I I t I 7 of70 T T I t I I I I I I I I I I I I t I i!Alianoe Source Test Report 2.0 Summary of Results Alliance conducted PS testing at the HF Sinclair facility in West Bountiful, Utah on May l, 2024. Testing included conducting a RATA to determine the RA of the SO:, NOx, CO, O: and CO2, CEMS and the VFR CERMS serving the FCCU WGS Unit 4. Table 2-l provides a summary of the RA results in comparison to the applicable RA requirements. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation. Table 2-l: Summary of Performance Specification Test Results CEMS Performance Test Data Relative Accuracy Reference Method Data CEMS Data Performance Required Performance Demonstrated Sulfur Dioxide Data Concentration, ppmvd @ 0% Oz 0.0t7 0.044 < l0o/o 0.18 o/o I Nitrogen Oxides Data Concentration, ppmvd @ 0% Oz 19.44 13.72 < l0Yo 8.56Yo I Carbon Monoxide Data Concentration, ppmvd @ 0o/o 02 95.34 95.89 < 5o/o l.96Yo l Oxygen Data Concentration. % (dry )2.69 r.86 t lo/o O:0.84Yo2 Carbon Dioxide Data Concentration . o/o (dry I 15.23 14.90 < 20o/o 238/01 Volumetric Flow Rate Flow Rate, mscfh 1,076.3 1,036.8 <20Yo 5.lg\o3 I Calculated using the applicable source standard for the pollutant. See Appendrx g for the appticable standird usei r Calculated using the difference between the reference method and CEMS data. 3 Calculated using the mean ref'erence method. AST-2024- I 65 r -00 I 8 of70 Page 2- I I HF Sinclair - West Bountiful. UT I t t t I I I I t I t I I I t I I I I 9 of70 I I I I I t I I I I T I I I I I I I I pul6rpe It.(l ![,i t(] r.i (illr, i Source Test Reporl Testing Methodology 3.0 Testing Methodology The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C. Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EpA Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l. Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type thermocouple and pyrometer. Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate for comparison to the continuous emission rate monitoring system (CERMS). The relative accuracy of the CERMS was determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance Specification 6. 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EpA Reference Test Method 34. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8. The relative accuracy of the Oz and COr CEMS was determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, Performance Specification 3. HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis Moisfure Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis Sulfur Dioxide 6C lnstrumental Analysis Nitrogen Oxides 7E lnstrumental Analysis Carbon Monoxide l0 Instrumental Analysis Gas Dilution System Certification 205 AST-2024- I 6s l -00 l l0 of70 Page 3-l I I I t I t I I I t t t I t I I I I t Source Test Report Testing Methodology 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed. 3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C - Sulfur Dioxide The sulfur dioxide (SOz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 6C. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a heated stainless steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the source gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8. The relative accuracy of the SOz CEMS was determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, performance Specification 3. 3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8. The relative accuracy of the NOx CEMS was determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, performance Specification 3. 3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10 - Carbon Monoxide The carbon monoxide (CO) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.8. The relative accuracy of the CO CEMS was determined based on procedures found in 40 CFR 60, performance Specification 3. 3.7 u.s. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System certification A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed within 2%o of the actual diluted gas concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- l 65 l -00 I I I of70 Page 3-2 r TA.lr,AII I Source Test Report Testinp Methodolom I I L I t T T I I I I T I I I T T divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 27o. These steps were repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix. 3.8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 6C, 7E and 10 Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix. Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv l%o absolute d ifference. High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppmv/7o (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low- Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppmvl%o or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/%o absolute difference. High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmvlo/o absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated. Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/Yo absolute difference. If the drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%o, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated. To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The pollutant concentrations were measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method l). Each traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time. If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/O.3% (whichever was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test runs. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 1.0 ppmvl}.5o/o from the average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than 10 percent or 1.0 HF Sinclair- West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 65 t -00 l 12 of70 Page 3-3 lEe ii: rraAI lr I \T I t T T T T T T I I t t I Source Test Report ppmvl0.so from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Qualify Control Appendix. An NOz - NO converter check was performed on the analyzer at the completion of testing. An approximately 50 ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response was recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +l- lO percent of the cylinder concentration. A Data Acquisition System with bauery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute averages. Thedatawascontinuouslystoredasa*.CSVfileinExcel formatontheharddriveofacomputer. Atthe completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the project Manager. AST-2024- I 65 | -00 l l3 of70 Page 3-4 I HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT T I I T t T I t t T I I I I T I t I t I4 of70 T I t t I I T I I I T T I I I I I I T Appendix A Example Calculations Locrtion HF Sinclnir Woods Cross Refining, LLC - WGst Bountiftrl, UT Sourc. Unit 4 Proiect No. Run No. I Meter Pr.sstrre (Pm), in, Hg AHPm = Pb+-. 13.6wnere. Pb 25.65 = barometric pressure, in Hg AH 1.000 = pressure differential oforifice, in HrO P.---3-i-= in Hg Absolute Steck Cas Pressurc (P!), in. Hg Ps . Ps = Pb+,,} wnere. Pb 25.65 = barometric pressure, in. Hg Pgg_= static pressure, in H2O Ps 25.64 = in. Hg Strndrrd Metcr Volume (Vmstd), dscf 17636xVmxPmxYilr'sru--lm where, Y 1.000 = meter correction factor v. ---1ffi = meter volume, cf P^ ___22J2_= absolute meter pressure, in HgTm 519 8 = absolute meter temperature, oR v.rtd ----I6i!3- = dr"f Standerd Wct Volume (Vystd), scf Vwstd= 0.04706x\4c Vlc I 14 8 = Volume ofH2O collected, ml Ypsl6ll[J-=""1 Moisture Frrction (BWSsri), dimcnsionlcss (th€oretical ra srturrted conditions) ,oe:z-(ffi)BWSsatwhcre, Dc Ts I 5 1.7 = stack temperature, oF P"_____?L!_= absolute stack gas pressure, in. HgBWSsat 0J05 = dimensionless Moisttrre Frection (BWS), dimensionless VwstdDtlrc _ _. (l/t^'cr.l r l/mctd\wnere. Vwstd 5.404 = standard wet volume, scf v*std --Jq-6i3- = standard meter volume, dscfBWS 0157 =dimensionless Moisture Frrction (BWS). dimensionlcss BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd vhere, BWSsat 0 305 = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)BWSmsd 0. I 57 = moisture fraction (measured) BWS 0.157 Mdecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lbnb-mole Md = (0.44 xo/oCO2) + (0.32 xo/oO2) + (0.28(100- %co2-o/oo2)) wherc, CO, _____.!j_.!_ = carbon dioxide concentration, 7o 02 28 =oxygenconcentration,To Md 30.51 = lb/lb mol Molecular Wcight (WET) (Ms). lbflb-molc Ms = Md (1 - BwS) + 18.015 (BWS) where,Md 30.53 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol BWS ----T.iJr- = moisture fraction. dimensionless Ms 28.57 = Ib4b mol l5 of70 t I t t I I t t t T t t T I t I I t I Appendix A Example Calculations Locstion Sourcc Projcct No. Run No. I Prra.eterls; Averrgc Vclocity (Vr), ftlsec vs = 85.49 x cp x (A p 1/2) avg x /=+-where' " 'l Ps x Ms Cp 0 84 = pitot tube c@flicient A P'' o712 = average pre/posr test vel@ity head ofstack gas, (in. HrO)r2 f. a]F- = average pre/post tesl absolute stack temperature, oRpr-.........ffi= absolute sraik gas pressure, in Hgfus li3-= moteculil weighr of stack gas, lb/ib mot vs -?6J- = fl/sec Avcragc Stack Ces FIow at St.ck Cotrditions (Qa), rcfm Qa=60xVsxAs where. Ys 46.7 = stack gas velocity, fusec As 8-73 : cross-sectional area ofstack, fl2 Qa ---f?76J- = 1e6. Average St{ck Ges Flow at Standard Condiaions (Qs), dscfm Qsd= l7616xQax(l -sws)x FIs Qa BWS Ps Ts Qs 24,465 0 157 -z-ffi6n3---ll7s8 = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm = moisture fraction, dimensionless =absolute stack gas pressure, in Hg = average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, oR = dscfm Dry Grs Met€r Calibrrtion Check (Yqa), dimcnsionle$ Yqa = whcre. Y -|__=.eter correction factor, dimensionlessO 60 = run time, min.V. jq2l_ = rotal meter volume, dcf Tm 519 8 = absolute meter temperature, oR Nl@ 1.922 = orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. HrOPb 25.65 = barometric pressure, in H8 AH avg L000 = average pressure differential oforifice, in HrO Md 30 53 = molecular weight (DRY), lblb mol 1AU;r'i t.OOO =averagesquarer@tpressuredifferentialoforifice,(in H2O)r2Yqa 0.1 = dimensionless x 100 l6 of70 I t I t T I I T t t I I I t I I I t I Appendix A Example Calculations Location: HF Sinclair Wooar C.os n.nning Source: Enit 4- Project No.: 45T-2024-165 I Run No. /Method Run I / Method 34 Or - Outlet Concentration (Co), oh dry where, COr - Outlet Concentration (Cco,), o/o dry where, Co,: (Cou,-Co)x ( #e) Cob" 3.0 : average analyzer value during test,%o dry C" --0- : average of pretest & posttest zero response s, %o dry CMA -Til0-- = actual concentration of calibration gas, %o dry CM -T05-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, Zo dryCo,-23-= Oz Concentration,o/o dry Cco,= (Cou,-Co)x ( ,#..) Cob, 14.7 : average analyzer value during test,o/o dry C" -0:T- = average of pretest & posttest zero response s, yo dryCMA-TiT--: actual concentration of calibration gas,o/o dry CM -T0- = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, Zo dryCco.-TtT-= COz Concentration, Zo dry 17 of70 I t I T I I t T T I I Appendix A Example Calculations Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinjng, LLC - West BounSource:- Project 1,,1e.; Run No. /Method Run I / Method l0 CO - Outlet Concentration (Cco), ppmvd cco= (co6,_C6)x 1 fr+c_.) where,Cob" 71.9 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvdC".-0.T-: average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvdCMA-0T-: actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvdC"-lf : average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvdCco-m-= CO Concentration, ppmvd CO - Outlet Concentration (Cco"o), ppmvd @ 0o/o O, cco"o= ccox (.# where,Cco 73.0 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvdCo,-8-: oxygen concentration, %o cco"o 84.6 = ppmvd @lYoO, t I I I t I I I r8or7o I Appendix A Example CalculationsI t I I I I t t t t t I I t I I I I Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinjng, LLC - West BounSource:- Project lle.; Run No. /Method Run I / Method 7E NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cxo,), ppmvd where, NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cxo,"o), ppmvd @ loh Oz CNo*"0 : CNo* X where,CNo* 14.5 : NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvdCo,--8-= oxygen concentration, Zo C*o*". --TE-- = ppmvd @0o/o o, CNo*: (Co6.-Ce)x ( #tJ) Cob, 15.2 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd C,_:averageofpretest&posttestzeroreSponSes,ppmvd CMA-2m--= actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd CMT:averageofpretest&poSttestcalibrationresponses'ppmvd CNo, -T4.-- = NOx Concentration, ppmvd l9 of70 I I T I I I I I I I t I I I T I t I I Appendix A Example Calculations SOr - Outlet Concentration (CsoJ, ppmvd Cso,: (Coo,-co)*( (ff.J where,Cob" 0.0 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvdC"-0.T-= average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvdCMA--2m--: actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd CMT=averageofpretest&posttestcalibrationreSponses,ppmvd Cso, -0;0-- = SOu Concentration, ppmvd i. Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cror. R"fi@Source:- Project lls.; Run No. /Method Run I / Method 6C SOz - Outlet Concentration (Cso,"o), ppmvd @|oh Oz Cso,"o: Cso,x ( where,Cso, 0.0 = SO, - Outlet Concentration, ppmvdCo,-28-= oxygen concentration, %o C.o,"o ---bl-- = ppmvd @0% O, 20 of70 Ir lr lr l,ll I T I t t I I I t t I t I I 2l of70 T T T T T I T t t T T T I t T I t I I F'TAAIlEe SO2 Summary Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source: Unit 4 Project No.: AST-2Q24-l 65 I Confidence Coefficient, CC ..=lH"r.l where,: degrees of freedom value = number of runs selected for calculating the RA 0.085 = standard deviation ofdifference0.065 = confidence coeflicient Relative Accuracy, RA ld I + lcclRA = 7s;;T#x 1oo where, d -0.03 : average difference of Relerence Method and CEMSCC 0.065 : confidence coellcientAS 50.000 = applicable source standard, ppmvd @ 0 % OzRA 0. I 8 : relative accuracy, o/o to srs n Sd CC 2.306 9 Run No.Date Time Reference Method SOr Concentration ppmvd@07oOu CEMS SOr Concentration oomvd @0 Vo O, Average Difference oomvd@07oOrStartEnd I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 sfi/24 5lt/24 5/v24 5lt/24 5lt/24 51U24 511t24 slt 124 5il/24 250 3:l I 3.32 4:10 4.31 4.52 5.34 5:55 6:16 3: l0 3:31 3:52 4:30 4:51 5.t2 5:54 6:l 5 6'.36 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 000 0.155 0.000 0 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.1 00 0.1 00 0.000 0.000 0.1 00 0.1 00 00 0.0 00 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.2 -0.I -0.1 Average 0.01 7 0.044 0.0 Standard Deviation (Sd)0.08s Applicable Source Standard (AS)50 Confi dence Coeffi cient (CC)0.065 Relative Accuracy (RA)0.18 o/o Perlormance Required - Applicable Source Standard RA s 10% Performance Specifi cation Methoc PS2 22 of 70 I t T T I t T T I T I t t T T T t t I NOx Summary Location: Source: Project No.:AST-2024- I 65 l HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining. LLC - West Bountiful. UT Unit 4 Confidence Coefficient, CC cc =ltoI'"sallVn I where, t{s75 2.306 n9 sd ---T465- cc---Tlra- Relative Accuracy, RA ldl+lcclRA = 7s;;Tr:x 1oo where, d CC AS RA = degrees offreedom value = number of runs selected for calculating the RA = standard deviation ofdifference = confidence coefficient 5.72 = average difference of Reference Method and CEMS1.126 = confidence coefficient 80.000 =applicablesourcestandard, ppmvd@Oo/oOz 856 = relative accuracy, o/o Run No.Date Time Reference Method NOx Concentration oomvd @.0 oh O, Cf,MS NOx Concentration ppmvd@07oOr Average Difference oomvd @0 o/o O,Start End I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5/ 5/ 5/ 5/ 5t 5/ 5/ 5t 5t v24 ll24 t/24 t/24 J24 t24 /24 /24 t24 l2:50 l3:ll 13.32 l4:10 l431 l4:52 15.34 l5:55 l6:16 3: l0 3:3 I 3.52 4:30 4.51 5.12 5:54 6:l 5 6.36 16.84 t7.95 16.64 19.81 20.33 t9.69 20.03 19.23 24.44 360 3.30 190 3.30 390 3.20 1.70 330 9.30 3.2 4.7 4.7 6.5 6.4 65 8.3 59 5t Average 19.44 5.7 Standard Deviation (Sd)1.465 Applicable Source Standard (AS)80 Confi dence Coeflicient (CC)Lt26 Relative Accuracy (RA)E.56 Yo Performance Required - Applicable Source Standard RA s t0% Performance Specifi cation Method PS2 23 of70 T T t T T I t T I t I I T I I I I I I Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source: Unit 4 Project No.: AST-2024-l 65 I Confidence Coefficient, CC cc = ltol'* sall{n I where, to.grs n Sd CC 2.306 = degrees offreedom value 9 = number of runs selected for calculating the RA 12.027 : standard deviation of difference9.245 = confidence coefficient Relative Accuracy, RA ldl+lcclRA = 7r;ffix 100 where, d -0.54 = average difference of Reference Method and CEMSCC 9.245 = confidence coefficient AS --500000-= applicable source standard, ppmvd @ 0 % O,RA l.% =relative accuracy,Yo Summary Run No,Date Time Reference Method CO Concentration ppmvd@07oOr CEMS CO Concentration oomvd@07oO, Average Difference oomvd@07oO,Start End I 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 5/ 5l 5l 5/ 5t st 5/ 5/ 5l t24 124 t24 /24 /24 t24 /24 /24 /24 l2:50 l3:l I 13.32 l4:10 l4:3 I l4:52 l5:34 15.55 l6:l 6 3: l0 3:31 3:52 4:30 4:51 5:12 5.54 6: l5 6..36 84 55 7 5.06 90.23 85.40 84 61 85.42 I t2.7 5 I63 09 76 99 82.00 76.00 85.00 84.00 84 00 80.00 r0l.00 194.00 77 00 3 -l 5 I I 5 t2 -31 0 Average 95.34 95 89 Standard Deviation (Sd't2.027 Applicable Source Standard (AS 500 Confi dence Coeffi cient (CC'9.24s Relative Accuracy (RA 1.96 Vo Performance Required - Applicable Source Standard RA<5% Performance Specifi cation Method PS 44 24 of70 T I I I I I I tt*--'t"Aliatpe Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source: [Jnit 4 Project No.: AST-2024-l 651 Run No.Date Time Reference Method O: Concentration o/o dry CEMS O: Concentration o/o dry Average Difference o/o drvStartEnd I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 s/U24 5^124 5/t/24 slt/24 5il124 s/t 124 5/t/24 51v24 5/t/24 2.50 3:l I 3:32 4:10 4:11 4.52 5:31 5:55 6: l6 3:10 3:31 3.s2 4.30 4.51 5:12 5.54 6:15 6:36 2.85 2.84 2.83 3. l5 2.9s 2.7 4 2.68 1.52 268 2.10 2.00 190 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.20 0.70 180 07s 0.84 0.93 ll5 095 0.7 4 0.48 0.82 088 Averast 2.69 1.86 0.84 Relative Accuracy (RA 0.84 Performance Required - Average Difference t lo/o Performance Specrfi cation Method PS3 25 of 70 0.046 0.035 T I T T I I t t ! I T I I t I T I I I CO2 Summary Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source: Unit 4 Project No.: AST-2024-165 I Confidence Coefficient, CC cc=1ff'sal where, to crs n Sd CC 2.306 = degrees of freedom value = number of runs selected for calculating the RA = standard deviation ofdifference = confidence coefficient Relative Accuracy, RA ld I + lcclRA = 7s;;;r:x 1oo where, d 0.33 = average difference of Reference Method and CEMS CC - 0Ot5-: confidence coefficientRM 15.227 = reference method, % dryRA 238 = relative accuracy,%o Run No.Date Time Reference Method COr Concentration o/o dry CEMS COz Concentration V" dw Average Difference Vo dryStartEnd I 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 9 5ilt24 5/t/24 5/t/24 5/U24 5nt24 slt 124 5/t/24 sfi/24 5lt t24 2.50 3:ll 5 5t 4:10 4:31 4:52 5:34 5:55 6:16 3:10 3:31 3.52 4:30 4.sl 5:12 554 6:15 6:36 508 5.1 I 5.12 s.l l 5l8 5. t6 4.9s 6.08 5.2s 480 4.80 480 4.80 480 4.80 4.60 5.70 5.00 0.3 03 0.3 03 04 0.4 UJ 0.4 0.2 Averas(5.23 490 0.3 Standard Deviation (Sd 0.046 Confi dence Coeflicient (CC 0 035 Relative Accuracy (RA)2.38 o/o Performance Required - Mean Reference Method RA s 20% Performance Speci fi cation Methoc PS3 26 of70 t T I T I t t I I T T I t t I T T I t VFR Summary Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source: Unit4 Project No.: AST-2024-165 I Relative Accuracy, RA RA _ ld lj__!ccl x 1oo where, Confidence Coefficient, CC cc = lt'g'* sallVn I where, tu,;' 2 306 n9sd-l.28 cc 16.36 d 39.56 cc 16.36RM 1,076 33RA 5.19 Bias Test Results, BA BA Required f ldl > CC where, d 39.556cc----JeB6--- Be Reqrired?---TEf- Bias Adjustment Factor, BAF dBAF=-+1CEMSA'g where,d 39.556 CEMS",P 1036.778 BAF 1.038 : degrees of freedom value = number ofruns selected for calculating the RA: standard deviation ofdifference: confidence coefficient = average difference ofReference Method and CEMS = confidence coefticient = reference method, mscfh = relative accuracy, o/o : average difference ofReference Method and CEMS: confidence coefficient = average difference of Reference Method and CEMS = average ofCEMS values = bias adjustment factor Run No.Date Time Reference Method Flow Rate mscfh CEMS Flow Rate mscfh Average Difference mscfhStrrtEnd I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5t 5t 5t 5t 5/ 5t 5t 5t 5t U24 124 U24 I/24 t/24 J24 J24 I/24 ',124 2:50 3:l I 3:37 4:10 4:31 4"52 534 5:55 6:16 l3: l0 l3:3 I l3:52 l4:30 l4:51 l5:12 l5:54 L6:15 6.36 ,086.0 oqt o ,104 0 ,078.0 ,08 r.0 ,069.0 ,043.0 ,066.0 .067.0 ,043.0 ,039.0 ,026 0 ,027.0 ,035.0 ,033 0 ,031.0 ,043.0 .054.0 43 54 78 5l 46 36 t2 23 l3 Averas(.076 3 ,036.8 40 Standard Deviation (Sd 2l Confidence Coefficient (CC 16.356 Relative Accuracy (RA 5.19 0/" Acceptability Criteria - Mean Reference Metho(<20Yo Performance Specifi cation Methoc PS6 27 of70 sNLEz {: E <\ o \ o Qy r : : <h \ o Q; , , i <6 h {n t <$ h (: r ! ? <$ t {= s <$ $ {E A i <6 6Q- r 1 <6 6 {f f ? <N - -* , 1 INr:a.l6i-i -l B ot -lN5lol;l6l+nl d b El ^ 6l=l !l6lUl s lN d()!la\l ^t tr lolEI 6l6l€.ooriNri@r; RI diNdNqn r@ \o <+ o !? s r@O6od€io r6s€oq q 6rq! 1 r6o9 .i Udlslol rd ) l == l E EI oo l dd l- ^t E c l o o l E Sl E C l o o l o o l c c l o o l U CJ I oo l UU I rINr -tn$ . -$NN 6S-\ o vlq+\ o 3J l .l .. tat os l > >t E EI cq l oo l ii lo ol c E l o o l o o l E C l o o l OU I 55 1 zz l ooooqc ooOOOOOO v( J .lsl3l oi l > > t E EI oo l oo l ii l o o l c c l o o l q cl o o l UU I oo l 66 1 aooQIJ ooclCBUoti TIItIttttTITITTtIII \oNNFa GooOEoBE6:E.= i 76= !=d z 'i '=! 0I lu S II( 28 of 70 I I Runl-RMData Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source: Unit 4 Project No.: AST-2024- 165 I T Date:5/l/24 t I I T t I t t t Time Unit Status 0: - Outlet o/o dry Valid COz - Outlet o/" dry Valid 14.67 10.97 -0.06 -0.05 -0.06 r 0.69 10.62 10.66 15.08 14.90 14.82 14.70 14.53 14.58 14.68 t4.17 14.46 14.59 14.50 14.74 15.17 14.80 14.91 14.92 14.97 14.55 14.60 t4.65 14.46 14.37 CO - Outlet ppmvd Valid 71.87 200.00 -0.22 -0.04 -0.r3 197.04 197.02 t97.03 73.04 NOx - Outlet ppmvd Valid 15. l9 25.00 0.53 1.77 l.l5 24.76 25.82 25.29 14.54 16.14 14.3 5 16.ll 13.63 14.56 13.37 12.26 13.44 15.79 14.1 5 14.71 17.09 17.91 17.62 17.91 17.60 14.s6 t 5.39 16.07 12.81 13.59 SOz - 0utlet ppmvd Valid l-.lncorrected Run Average (Co5.) Cal Gas Concentration (Cyn) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run Ave orr) l2:50 l2:51 l2:52 l2:53 l2:54 l2:55 l2:56 l2:57 l2:58 l2:59 l3:00 l3:01 l3:02 I 3:03 l3:04 I 3:05 l3:06 l3:07 l3:08 l3:09 l3:10 3.02 10.99 0.14 0.37 0.26 10.88 I r.00 10.94 2.85 2.7 4 2.85 2.97 3.r8 3.08 2.99 3.52 3.22 3.06 3.21 2.94 2.46 2.92 2.77 2.77 2.72 3.20 3.15 3.05 3.29 3.38 56.14 s2.6 77.22 74.68 72.16 92.45 101.52 82.07 70.42 89.45 59.83 37.53 56.54 54.83 43.71 52.48 121.52 73.7 6 68.71 98.89 72.7 6 0.01 25.00 0.01 0.21 0.1 I 23.85 23.90 23.88 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.0 r 0.02 0.01 0.0r 0.0r 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.0 rI t T I I I t 29 of70 T I Run2-RMData Location: Source: Project No.: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful. UT Unit 4 AST-2024-1651IDate: 5lll24 I I I T I I T I I Time Unit Status Uncorrected Run Average (Co5,) Cal Gas Concentration (Cr1a) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run A. O: - Outlet CO: - Outlet CO - Outlet o/o dry o/o dry ppmvdValid Valid Valid NOx - Outlet S0z - Outletppmvd ppmvdValid Valid 0.01 25.00 0.0 r 0.21 0.1 I 23.85 23.90 23.88 0.00 16.58 15.86 15.07 17.31 16.33 14.30 15.87 17.89 t6.87 15.97 18.l8 18.86 15.58 14.79 13.92 12.41 16.40 15.51 17.87 16.03 17.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.0r 0.01 0.01 l3:l I l3:12 l3:13 l3:14 l3:15 I 3:16 l3:17 l3: l8 l3:19 l3:20 13:21 l3:22 l3:23 '13:24 l3:25 l3:26 l3:27 13:28 13:29 I 3:30 l3:3 I 62.44 7 t.82 80.34 6s.04 r I 1.89 68.60 51.04 40.63 66.36 50.3 r 44.9s 43.14 6l .01 73.55 72.55 84.47 76.35 53.79 49.45 59.97 51.92 3.02 r 0.99 0.14 0.37 0.26 10.88 I 1.00 r 0.94 2.84 3.08 3.06 3.15 2.82 3.08 3.t4 2.82 2.86 3.l0 2.68 2.80 2.94 3.36 3.29 3.30 3.30 3.20 2.86 2.54 2.96 3.09 14.70 10.97 -0.06 -0.05 -0.06 10.69 10.62 r 0.66 l5.l I 14.66 14.63 14.54 14.84 14.67 14.58 14.87 14.84 14.59 15.02 14.91 14.79 14.43 14.44 14.45 14.46 14.53 14.84 r5. l0 14.80 t4.63 63.79 200.00 -0.22 -0.04 -0.r3 197.04 197.02 197.03 64.84 16.12 25.00 0.53 1.77 l.l5 24.76 2s.82 25.29 15.51 I I I t I t I 30 of 70 I I Run3-RMData Location: Source: Project No.: Date: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refin LLC - West Bounti Unit 4 AST-2024- 165 r 5/U24I t t T T I I T I I I Time Unit Status Uncorrected Run Average (Co6,) Cal Gas Concentration (Cya) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run Av l3:32 l3:33 I 3:34 l3:35 l3:36 l3:37 l3:38 l3:39 I 3:40 l3:41 13:42 l3:43 l3:44 l3:45 l3:46 l3:47 l3:48 l3:49 l3:50 l3:5 I l3:52 3.01 10.99 0. l4 0.37 0.26 r 0.88 I 1.00 10.94 2.83 3.27 3.35 3.22 2.52 2.75 2.67 2.61 2.77 3.30 3.42 3.r9 2.92 2.92 2.64 2.73 2.90 3.t9 2.76 3.03 3.49 3.54 76.76 200.00 -0.22 -0.04 -0. l3 197.04 197.02 197.03 78.00 64.53 73.13 96.09 87.92 53.59 69.83 7 1.07 59.46 78.14 90.69 87.19 87.50 97.24 61.44 55.37 91.69 61.01 46.47 85.84 79.47 114.28 0.02 25.00 0.01 0.21 0.tI 23.85 23.90 23.88 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.0 t 0.0 r 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 Ou - Outlet "/o dry Valid COr - Outlet %" dry Valid 14.70 10.97 -0.06 -0.05 -0.06 10.69 10.62 10.66 15.12 14.50 t 4.38 14.42 1s.07 14.88 14.96 15.06 14.97 14.42 14.35 t4.51 14.79 14.77 15.03 14.99 14.78 14.58 14.92 14.78 14.34 14.25 CO - Outlet ppmvd Valid NOx - Outlet ppmvd Valid 15.04 25.00 0.53 1.77 l.l5 24.76 25.82 25.29 14.39 14.61 l3.ll 11.42 I1.98 15.88 15.86 17.70 15.92 r 5.08 13. l3 14.74 12.90 13.15 r6.29 r8.5I 16.23 t6.71 1"1.62 17.93 14.50 12.58 SOr - Outlet ppmvd Valid T t I I t I 3l ol70 I I Run4-RMData HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Unit 4 Location: Source: Project No.: Date: AST-2024- 1651 51v24T T I I t t I I t T Time tlnit Status flncorrected Run Average (Co6.) Cal Gas Concentration (Cya) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run Averaqe (Corr l4: l0 l4:l I l4:12 l4:13 l4:14 l4:15 l4:16 l4:17 l4:18 l4:19 l4:20 l4:21 l4:22 l4:23 l4:24 l4:25 l4:26 l4:27 l4:28 l4:29 l4:30 0z - Outlet 'h dry Valid COz - Outlet Y, dry Valid CO - Outlet ppmvd Valid NOx - Outlet ppmvd Valid SOz - Outlet ppmvd Valid 0.02 25.00 0.21 0.94 0.58 23.90 23.61 23.76 0.00 0.1 I 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.0 r 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 3. r9 r 0.99 0.37 -0. l0 0. t4 I 1.00 10.58 10.79 3. l5 3.43 3.s3 2.83 2.87 3.15 3.37 2.99 3.22 3.42 3.29 3.35 3.37 3.38 3.17 3.29 3. l0 3.28 3.07 2.79 2.94 3. l0 14.68 10.97 -0.0s 0.0r -0.02 10.62 t 0.68 r 0.65 l5.l I 14.35 14.28 14.90 14.9t 14.68 14.44 14.78 14.66 14.62 14.73 14.66 14.60 14.52 14.69 14.62 t4.75 14.61 14.78 14.99 14.93 14.77 7 t.34 200.00 -0.04 -0.22 -0. l3 197.02 196.82 196.92 72.54 90.71 67.39 52.45 61.63 73.65 67.52 88.5 r 65.65 62.82 63.76 109.13 59.16 7 5.29 109.40 72.38 68.23 84.03 55.57 46.16 53.29 7 1.38 17.74 2s.00 1.77 0.86 t.32 25.82 25.60 25.71 16.83 15.29 17.42 17.08 16.62 17.35 r 6.53 17.27 t7.5t r 8.49 19.10 t6.lI 17.97 17.13 17.79 17.77 t7.23 15.95 18.30 2t.61 19.23 20.7 tI t I I I I t 32 of70 t I Run5-RMData Location: HF Sinclair Woq{s Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source: Unit 4 Project No.: AST-2024-165 I T Datez 5ll/24 t I I I t t I T I Time frnit Status Uncorrected Run Average (Co5,) Cal Gas Concentration (Cya) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run Ave Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet 'h dry %. dry ppmvdValid Valid Valid NOx - Outlet SOz - Outlet ppmvd ppmvd Valid Valid 18.35 25.00 t.77 0.86 1.32 25.82 25.60 25.71 17.46 2.99 10.99 0.37 -0.r0 0.t4 I1.00 r 0.58 10.79 2.9s 3.5 1 3.52 3.64 2.77 2.91 2.74 3.24 2.87 3.23 2.81 2.82 2.98 2.73 2.64 3.15 2.85 3.22 2.73 2.64 3.00 2.86 14.75 10.97 -0.05 0.01 -0.02 10.62 10.68 r 0.65 15.18 14.39 14.35 14.20 15.0t 14.92 15.01 14.55 14.84 14.55 t4.90 t4.92 14.77 14.98 r 5.04 14.63 t4.81 14.48 14.93 14.99 14.68 14.76 71.47 200.00 -0.04 -0.22 -0. l3 197.02 196.82 196.92 72.67 0.0r 25.00 0.2t 0.94 0.58 23.90 23.61 23.76 0.00 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.0 t 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 l4:31 l4:32 l4:33 l4:34 l4:35 l4:36 l4:37 l4:38 l4:39 l4:40 l4:41 l4:42 l4:43 l4:44 l4:45 l4:46 l4:47 l4:48 l4:49 l4:50 l4:51 97.60 r r8.66 148.34 53.17 56.26 67.53 62.65 62.90 63.99 7 t.t7 61.4t 5 1.95 64.88 61.72 62.44 71.73 8l.l I 64.85 53.61 68.56 56.31 16.06 15.46 13.53 16.82 r 8.83 18.67 19.42 18.32 17.73 17.97 18.92 22.07 19.7 7 19.14 19.90 19.39 t7.16 17.98 19.7 4 19.42 l9.llI I T I I T T 33 of70 I t Run6-RMData HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refi , LLC - West Bountiful, UT Unit 4 Location: Source: Project No.: Date: AST-2024-r65r 5/t t24I I T I T I T T I T Time Unit Status Uncorrected Run Average (Co6.) Cal Gas Concentration (Cs1) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run Average (C Oz - Outlet '/o dry Valid COz - Outlet oh dry Valid CO - Outlet ppmvd Valid NOx - Outlet ppmvd Valid SOz - Outlet ppmvd Valid l4:52 l4:53 l4:54 l4:5 5 l4:56 14:57 l4:58 l4:59 l5:00 l5:01 15:02 I 5:03 l5:04 I 5:05 l5:06 15:07 I 5:08 l5:09 l5:10 l5:l I l5:12 2.79 r 0.99 0.37 -0. r0 0.14 I 1.00 10.58 10.79 2.74 2.96 3.34 2.84 2.77 3.07 2.69 2.60 2.66 2.27 2.37 2.84 2.62 2.77 3.45 2.82 2.44 2.78 2.55 2.29 3.05 3.45 14.73 t0.97 -0.05 0.01 -0.02 10.62 r 0.68 10.65 15.t6 14.67 14.34 14.73 14.84 t4.51 14.87 14.89 14.87 15. l9 1 5.14 14.71 14.87 14.74 14.07 14.60 15.01 14.69 14.89 15. l4 14.49 t4.04 73.00 200.00 -0.04 -0.22 -0. l3 197.02 196.82 196.92 74.22 85.r3 120.54 7 4.39 51.43 70.92 85.34 65.56 54.67 57.24 37.2t 55.61 50.54 58.32 118.77 93.26 40.90 6t.12 s8.67 72.46 78.39 142.46 18.0 r 25.00 1.77 0.86 1.32 25.82 25.60 25.71 l7.l I 19.28 14.63 15.93 17.52 18.30 18.51 19.t7 19.87 r9.3I 19.89 20.07 21.03 19.26 15.49 13.65 19.20 19.22 19.00 17.78 17. l0 13.96 0.01 25.00 0.21 0.94 0.58 23.90 23.61 23.76 0.00 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.00 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.0r 0.0 r 0.00 T I I I I T T T RunT-RMData HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UTLocation: Source: Project No.: Unit 4 AST-2024-165r T Date: 5lll24 I I T t T T I t T Time Unit Status Llncorrected Run Average (Co6.) Cal Gas Concentration (Crn) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run A Oz - Outlet Yo dry Valid 2.67 r 0.99 -0. l0 0.20 0.05 10.58 10.98 r 0.78 2.68 COz - Outlet o/o dry Valid CO - Outlel ppmvd Valid 96.55 200.00 -0.22 -0.r5 -0. r9 196.82 196.50 196.66 98.29 88.02 84.98 97.13 84.24 102.66 96.80 I 15.57 95.51 71.7 t r r0.40 100. l9 99.71 r56.10 98.10 108.28 106.85 54.33 7 5.25 67.63 78.3 5 135.82 NOx - Outlet ppmvd Valid 18.02 25.00 0.86 0. l6 0.51 25.60 25.57 25.59 17.46 SOz - Outlet ppmvd Valid 0.75 25.00 0.94 0.32 0.63 23.6t 23.50 23.s6 0. l4 14,57 10.97 0.0r -0.03 -0.01 10.68 10.70 10.69 14.95 l5:34 l5:35 l5:36 l5:37 l5:38 l5:39 l5:40 l5:41 l5:42 I 5:43 l5:44 I 5:45 l5:46 l5:47 I 5:48 l5:49 l5:50 l5:51 l5:52 l5:53 l5:54 3. l0 3.00 3.t5 2.96 3.06 3.0 r 3.17 2.82 2.75 2.77 2.82 3.r0 3 -25 2.74 2.84 2.69 2.2t 1.97 1.69 1.71 1.23 14.24 14.27 t4.14 14.32 14.t9 14.30 t4.t I t4.41 14.53 14.49 14.48 14.24 't4.02 14.52 14.44 t4.52 14.93 15.21 15.43 15.38 15.78 15.39 16.76 18.37 18.67 17.47 18.09 17.56 17.71 19.79 19.27 19.70 20.01 t7.tt 16.3 r 17.83 t7.60 18.58 18.60 t8.67 18.59 t6.39 4.81 2.53 I .81 r.36 1.04 0.82 0.65 0.51 0.41 0.34 0.31 0.23 0.21 0.2t 0.1 I 0.1 I 0.1 I 0. l0 0. l0 0.05 0.01 I I T T I I T 35 of 70 I I AI ,*1FTATEE Run8-RMData HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UTLocation: Source: Project No.: tlnit 4 AST-2024-165t T Date: 511124 T T T T I T I I I Time tlnit Status l-Jncorrected Run Average (Co5,) Cal Gas Concentration (Csn) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cy) Corrected Run A l5:55 l5:56 l5:57 l5:58 l5:59 l6:00 l6:0 I l6:02 l6:03 l6:04 l6:05 l6:06 l6:07 l6:08 l6:09 l6: l0 l6:l 1 l6:12 l6:13 16:14 l6: l5 Oz - Outlet o/o dry Valid COz - Outlet o/. dry Valid CO - Outlet ppmvd Valid NOx - Outlet ppmvd Valid 18.39 25.00 0.86 0.r6 0.51 25.60 25.57 25.59 17.83 S0: - Outlet ppmvd Valid 0.01 25.00 0.94 0.32 0.63 23.61 23.50 23.56 0.00 1.54 10.99 -0.10 0.20 0.05 10.58 10.98 10.78 1.52 l.ll 1.09 t.0 t 1.12 1.54 1.68 1.69 l.3l 0.95 1.69 1.39 1.24 1.79 2.28 r.82 L9l t.7 t 1.67 r.67 t.7 5 1.87 15.67 10.97 0.01 -0.03 -0.01 10.68 10.70 10.69 16.08 148.63 200.00 -0.22 -0.r5 -0. r9 t96.82 196.50 196.66 l5 r .20 336. l l 176.32 35 l. l0 135.95 37.93 64.63 78.45 14 t.50 500.00 t49.53 t26.95 393.54 70.62 70.51 42.69 49.28 I14.59 58.63 8 1.32 59.92 8 1.69 l5.89 15.96 r 6.06 t 6.00 t5.7 I 15.54 15.54 15.77 16.13 15.57 15.'17 15.97 15.52 15.12 15.46 r 5.39 15.55 15.60 15.63 15.53 15.46 15.73 15.72 r 3.38 14.10 t 8.36 19.77 19.15 18.87 t 7.08 18.13 20.34 t9.77 19.07 18.86 19.97 21.41 19.20 18.15 19.61 19.40 20.14 0.0r 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.01 0.0r 0.0r 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 I I t I T I I 36 of70 I t Run9-RMData HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Unit 4 Location: Source: Project No.: I)ate: AST-2024- 165 I 5/U24t I I t I I T I t I Time LInit Status LJncorrected Run Average (Coo.) Cal Gas Concentration (Cya) Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Average Zero Response (Co) Pretest System Cal Response Posttest System Cal Response Average Cal Response (Cs) Corrected Run A l6: l6 l6:17 l6: l8 l 6:19 l6:20 l6:21 16:22 l6:23 l6,'24 l6:25 l6:26 l6:27 16:28 l6:29 l6:30 l6:3 I l6:32 l6:33 16:34 l6:3 5 l6:36 O: - Outlet oh dry Valid COz - Outlet o/, dry Valid CO - Outlet ppmvd Valid NOx - Outlet ppmvd Valid 2 r.88 25.00 0.86 0. l6 0.5 r 25.60 25.57 25.59 2l.3t 20.62 20.14 21.64 21.95 20.93 20.33 23.68 20.84 18.70 17.69 20.76 22.t9 19.17 22.32 24.15 25.87 26.15 27.42 26.26 20.83 17.84 SOz - Outlet ppmvd Valid 0.01 25.00 0.94 0.32 0.63 23.61 23.50 23.56 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.0r 0.0 r 0.01 0.0 r 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 2.67 10.99 -0. l0 0.20 0.05 10.58 r 0.98 10.78 2.68 r 4.86 10.97 0.01 -0.03 -0.0 r 10.68 10.70 10.69 15.25 65.8 7 200.00 -0.22 -0.r5 -0. l9 196.82 196.50 196.66 67.11 67.88 54.86 24.66 34.22 42.11 36.22 25.32 63.09 85.1 5 7 4.40 68.77 7t.tl 9t.82 68.97 65.7 I 52.77 70.42 73.42 85.62 130.17 96.5 8 2.19 1.80 2.12 2.10 2.39 2.07 2.t4 2.60 2.96 3. l6 2.74 2.90 3.39 2.61 2.54 2.54 2.70 3.01 3.23 3.54 3.28 15.17 15.52 15.27 15.27 t 5.00 15.38 15.33 14.93 14.62 14.45 14.84 14.67 14.25 14.92 15.04 15.01 14.93 t4.67 14.43 14.09 14.33 I T T t I I I 37 of70 t T Method I Data Lertion HF Sincleir Woods Crois Proj6t No. AST-2024-1651I I I I I T I T t I I I t t t T I Detci Oinln4 DuctOrientrtion: Vetucal Dr.t D..ign, --tiiii- Distrnce from Fir Wrll ro Outside of Pon' ---iifr-in tippt. L.ngtt' --iio- tn Deprh of Dr"t' ---?66-in Crols Sectionrl Arer of Du.t, ---llJ-tr, No. of T..t Portr, --i- Number of Rerdings p". Point' -----i- ,,.,rn"" ^, ---lii- r, Dislrnce A Duct Dism"t".r, ----i-1.usr bG :0.5) Dirt"n"" B, ---l'il-ft Distxnc€ B Duct Dismcters: 2 L:] (must b. Z 2) Minimum Number of Treverse Points: 12 Actu.l Numb.r ofTrevercG Points: ----it- llleuurer (lnitial end Drr.), ffiji7i Reviewer (Initisl rnd D"t"), -EEEI7iZi ctxe uuax uuu t LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Number oftmvcrse poinls on a diameter I z J 4 5 6 7 8 9 t0 lt t2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 t0 ll l2 t4.6 *:n 6.1 25.0 75.0 931 44 l.l 6 29.6 70.4 85,1 95.6 32 t05 t9 4 32.3 677 80.6 895 968 2.6 82 t.t 6 22.6 312 65.8 774 854 91 8 2.t 67 ll8 17.7 25.0 35.6 64.4 75.0 82.3 8t.2 93.3 919 Trrverse Point "/" ol Disirnc€from outside ofwrll I 2 3 4 5 6 1 t 9 l0 ll t2 4.4 14.6 296 704 85.4 ,r,a t76 5.84 ll8.l 21r 16 34 16 38 24 -. 976 t3 8,r t9 84 36. l6 42.16 46:4 Suck Diagrm A= 28tt. B= 7r ft. Depth o[Duct = 40 m. Cross Sectional Area Downstream Dislurbance aaaooa Upstream Disturbance 38 of 70 Cyclonic Flow Check ,:-AIiatpe l' Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UT Source Unit 4 Project No. AST-2024-1651 Date 5/1124 Sample Point Angle (AP=O) I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 ll t2 Average 9.2 39 of 70 6> ?6 ; ! .= : z - - = e ? 3 : i I ; ! ! E i: ; I i : P. : F X . o o ij Y ^l : E o o o ' - ; x r R t : ! :: o -O 6 5 99 4 1 t 1 * = - ! , n r 6: !- , ; \ ;> - - c 3 3 3 [ 3l : g: :: . ; ; *; i E i i (, o- - a 6h r n , n 1 9 ? r a * : A o= + = -4 3 - ; ! 6.- - a =: E I ; i E E i: i= i E *; 1 i x I : i8 = I 9 o6 a t s ai r l * 1 n 1 ! n + + { x= : : i s: j i + - . ! ;, - - c : 3 r; : X 3 e: !: , i 3l ; i ! f ; Qi . ; :: - ; U X =: . ^ - ' h < ? " -' r >> : : - r! € i Q 6r - - o : = = I ! i !; I5 I = ; E I s; it I !- r I r,6 d o 4h 6 6 9 * 9 ! 9 n 6 v a!! 9 :: 3 i; i E: : 3: x =: t; : c i i e 3F - x Q o- O < ss s x S X s e : S: x ; 3 i e * [ l i i4 * ; Q =n : - = s= E H B X ; : : : : : o E i ; : g i l (, ?E . E E E i ' ! e- i a" , 3 E. E F c ;E :^ e a ; a e a a E, i Q s i a a a : ? ? €' € t ; 3 s c 3' _ 4_ ts F_ ? Z Z_ e U = = z s € g gg € € _ 6e et E i; i ! ? : : : ; !i l i i 3 : E E E i E j ;? ! E ; i r ts : E ! ; tE 5 g€ € ;s E ; ; E E E, ; E ; ; E E E ; = E g ! F iE E i i i i : ; << t : :: c; ; ! ! ! ! = E ;. i : : r : ; : : : : ,i -F i- E ;E E ; ; ; ; ' EE ;i 5 i = = E9 tr a I ?d o ! r , € E d 40 of 70 TT5 TE q) IIIITttItTtor8 . \t r E l=r( I Al6rEE) Locrtion !Es!!qb!dqod! Cmir Refinins, LLC - W.tt Eounriful. UT Sourcc Unil I Prqicd No. AST-2021-1651Prrrn.r.i.! !l!s Consolc Utrit! / M€thod ftJ Ml I I t t T I T T T I I I I I t I I T I tun No. )atc irrtus ;lrrl Time lnd Timc tun'Iime, mitr (0) I 5/t/2t VALID l2:50 ll:50 60 5^/2t VALID t{ l0 l5:l o 60 MB706 J 5il/2t VALD l5:31 l6:11 60 ilcter Cofr€ctioo Frctor (Y) )rific. Crlibntion Vrlue (AH ,a) [rr Vrcuum, in. Hg t0@ I 922 l 1.000 t.922 5 ooto l.0u) t.922 { Mclcr Volumc,ftj 0 5 lo l5 20 25 JO 35 {o {5 s0 55 60 Iotel M.t.r Vohn.- fl3 rum\ 636.925 639.621 6{2.+00 615.200 6t8 700 650 100 651.000 657.J00 660.600 62.100 668.550 670 t00 671.5{6 612.121 676 I+{ 6?9 833 6112.95 I 685.85 l 649.11<) 693 0t7 696 046 699 111 102.UA 705 022 708.t80 7 t2 11t to 150 1 t2.516 1t6.219 ? I r).30J 122 213 72J 068 729 180 112.617 715..{80 739 l6l 743.523 116 321 1 19 219 752.9 t6 U a () l5 20 ,5 30 35 lo l5 50 55 60 Averrg€ Trmpcrrturc, 6F Arerege Temp€rrrur€, oR Minhum Teml'tntor€, 'F Mrrimum Temilcrrttrrc.oF (Tm) (rm) Melcr 78 11 11 18 79 80 8l 8t 82 82 82 E2 E] to J{0 11 81 Prob(Filt.r ImD. Erit 67 65 63 62 62 6t 62 62 62 63 63 6t 6l 63 6l Mclcr t3 81 8:l 83 E3 8l 8l E+ 84 84 8l 8l 8l t3 513 8l Prob€Filtcr lmp. Erit 61 61 65 65 63 6t 6t 6l 62 63 6l 6:l 6l 63 6t Meler a2 82 EI EI 8l 80 EO 80 80 80 EO 80 80 8l 510 80 Filter IdD. Eril 66 63 6l 59 58 51 56 55 56 56 56 51 J8 5E 5l 66lrmm€tric Pr6!ure, h. Hg (Pb) Yleter Orific€ Prgsure , in. WC (AH) trctcr Prellurc, itr. Hg em) 25.65 I ofr) 25.12 25.65 I 100 25 15 \3 519 25.65 1.100 25 15 \nrlv!i! TyF mlinger l, Pre/Poil Tcrt, g m[ingcr 2, Prc/Polt Te!t, g mpingcr r, Prc/Port Tert, g mpingcr{, Prer'Post Tcst, g /olumc Wrt.rColl6ted, mL (Vlc) irrndrrd W.tcr Volum€,fC (Vw!td) floirtud Frrction Mersurcd (BWS) ;r! Mol.culrrWcight. lb/lb-molc (dry) (Md) H:O H,O EmprI 733.6 735 I 6lt 9 E3l l 716 1 6t2 J 100.8 l6 06 Hlo H'o EmPtr' 8:i4.4 136.7 6!2.5 9ll 5 739 8 643.6 t0l71 loo. I 3.t l.t H:O H:O Emptl 9l{.5 739 8 613.6 9E2.5 801. t 6l+.0 to25 1 t8.0 6l.l 0.1 flol[8 5.t01 0.157 30.53 I t6.l 5 173 0 140 30.55 |77 J,J] 9 0. ll0 30.55 4l of70 I t t T t I I I I I t I I t I I I t I 42 of 70 I t I I s::"AIiarpe QA Data HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UTLocation Source Project No. Unit 4 AST-2024-165 t I t t I I T I I I I t I I t I Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet SOr - Outlet Make Model S/N Operatine Ranse Servomex 1440 1420c-2 0-25 Servomex 1440 12t5C-6 0-25 Thermo 48i 1028144972 0-100 CAI 600 E030 1 8 0-r00 Thermo 43i 0-50 Cylinder ID Zero Mid Hish NA 880042240 cc719736 NA 880042240 cc719736 NA cc12t736 cc721736 NA EB004 I I 07 EB004l 107 NA EB004 I I 07 EB004l 107 Cylinder Certifed Values Zero Mid Hish NA r0.99 24.0 NA 10.97 23.7 NA 519 519 NA 50. I 50. I NA 49.0 49.0 Cylinder Expiration Date Zero Mid Hish NA t212713t 8n6t28 NA t2l2713l 8lt6t28 NA 219127 219127 NA 7127129 7127129 NA 7127129 7127129 Tvpe of Sample Line Heated Line 43 of70 ;::AIiarpe Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinine, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Response Times Source: Unit 4 Project No.: AST-2024-165 I Times, seconds Parameter Oz - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet SO: - Outlet Zero Low Mid Hish 30 NA 30 30 30 NA 30 30 50 NA 50 50 60 NA 60 60 90 NA 90 90 Average 30.0 30.0 50.0 60.0 90.0 purrurpe HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Calibration Data Location: Source: Project No.: Unit 4 AST-2024-165 I Datet 5lll24 I T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parameter O, - Outlet CO: - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet SOz - Outlet Expected Average Concentration 2.50 15.00 100.00 25.00 2.00 Span Between Low High Desired Span 2.50 20.00 24.00 15.00 75.00 23.70 100.00 500.00 390.00 25.00 125.00 50.10 2.00 20.00 49.00 Low Range Gas Low Hieh NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mid Range Gas Low Hish 9.60 t4.40 9.48 14.22 156.00 234.00 20.04 30.06 19.60 29.40 High Range Gas Low Hieh NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Concentration (% or ppm) Zero Low Mid Hioh 0.00 NA r 0.99 24.00 0.00 NA 10.97 23.70 0.00 NA 200.00 390.00 0.00 NA 25.00 50. l0 0.00 NA 25.00 49.00 Response Time (seconds)30.00 30.00 50.00 60.00 90.00 Uoscale Calibration Gas (C Mid Mid Mid Mid Mid Instrument Response (7o or ppm) Zero Low Mid Hish 0.00 NA 10.8 r 23.63 -0.05 NA 10.83 23_69 0.04 NA 193.95 39t.02 0.09 NA 25.03 50.39 0.0 r NA 25.06 48.92 Performance (%, of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.) Zero Low Mid Hiph 0.00 NA 0.75 1.54 0.21 NA 0.59 0.04 0.01 NA 1.55 0.26 0. l8 NA 0.06 0.58 0.02 NA 0.12 0.16 Status Zero Low Mid Hish PASS NA PASS PASS PASS NA PASS PASS PASS NA PASS PASS PASS NA PASS PASS PASS NA PASS PASS 45 of 70 Bias/Drift Determinations HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins, LLC - West Bountiful, UTLocation: Source: Project No.: tlnit 4 AST-2024-165 I I t I I t I t t t I I I I I I T I t t Parameter Oz - Outlet COu - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet SO, - Outlet Run I Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response 0.l4 0.37 10.88 I 1.00 -0.06 -0.0s 10.69 10.62 -0.22 -0.04 t9'7.04 197.02 0.53 1.7'l 24.76 25.82 0.01 0.21 23.85 23.90 Run 2 Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response 0.14 0.37 10.88 I 1.00 -0.06 -0.05 10.69 t0.62 -0.22 -0.04 197.04 197.02 0.53 1.77 24.76 25.82 0.01 0.21 23.85 23.90 Run 3 Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response 0.14 0.37 10.88 I 1.00 -0.06 -0.05 10.69 t0.62 -0.22 -0.04 t97.04 197.02 0.53 1.77 24.76 25.82 0.01 0.21 23.85 23.90 Run 4 Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response 0.37 -0. l0 l1.00 10.58 -0.05 0.01 10.62 10.68 -0.04 -0.22 197.02 196.82 1.77 0.86 25.82 25.60 0.21 0.94 23.90 23.61 Run 5 Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Uoscale Response 0.37 -0. l0 l1.00 10.58 -0.05 0.01 10.62 10.68 -0.04 -0.22 197.02 196.82 t.77 0.86 25.82 25.60 0.21 0.94 23.90 23.61 Run 6 Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Upscale Resoonse 0.37 -0. l0 l 1.00 10.58 -0.05 0.0 r 10.62 10.68 -0.04 -0.22 t97.02 196.82 1.77 0.86 25.82 25.60 0.21 0.94 23.90 23.61 Run 7 Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response -0. l0 0.20 t 0.58 10.98 0.01 -0.03 10.68 t 0.70 -0.22 -0. l5 196.82 196.50 0.86 0. l6 25.60 25.57 0.94 0.32 23.6t 23.50 Run I ?retest System Zero Response ?osttest System Zero Response ?retest System Upscale Response ?osttest System Upscale Response -0. l0 0.20 10.58 10.98 0.01 -0.03 10.68 10.70 -0.22 -0. l5 196.82 196.50 0.86 0. l6 25.60 25.57 0.94 0.32 23.61 23.50 Run 9 Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Uoscale ResDonse -0.10 0.20 10.58 10.98 0.01 -0.03 r 0.68 10.70 -0.22 -0.r5 196.82 196.50 0.86 0.l6 25.60 25.57 0.94 0.32 23.61 23.50 46 of 70 anffir=e Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT Bias/Drift Determ inations Source: [Jnit 4 Project No.: AST-2024-1651 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Parameter Or - C)utlet CO: - Outlel CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet SOz - Outlet Run I Date 5lll24 Span Value Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Upscale Response 24.00 0.00 10.8l 0. l4 0.37 10.88 I 1.00 23.70 -0.05 10 83 -0.06 -0.0s 10.69 10.62 390.00 0.04 l 93.9s -0.22 -0.04 t97.04 t97.02 50 10 0.09 2s.03 0.53 1.77 24.76 25.82 49.00 0.01 2s.06 0.01 0.21 23.8s 23 90 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest SDan 0.58 1.54 0.29 0'79 -0.04 0.00 -0.59 -0.89 -0.07 -0.02 0.79 0.79 0.88 3.35 -0.54 1.58 0.00 0.41 -2.47 -2.37 Drift (%) Zero Mid 0.96 0.50 0.04 -0.30 0.05 -0.0 r 248 2.t2 0.41 0.10 Run 2 Date 5lll24 Span Value Instrument Zero Cal Response Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale Response 24.00 0.00 10.81 0.14 0.37 10.88 il00 23.70 -0 05 I 0.83 -0.06 -0.05 10.69 10.62 390.00 0.04 193.9s -0.22 -0.04 197.04 197.02 50.10 0.09 25.03 0.53 1.77 24.76 2s.82 49.00 0.01 25.06 0.01 0.2t 23.85 23.90 3ias (%) )retest Zero )osttest Zero )retest Span )osttest Span 0.58 1.54 0.29 0.79 -0.04 0.00 -0.59 -0.89 -0 07 -0.02 079 0.79 0.88 3.35 -0.54 1.58 0.00 0.41 -2 47 -2.37 Drift (%) Zero Mid 0.96 0.s0 0.04 -0.30 0.05 -0.0 t 2.48 2.12 0.41 0. l0 Run 3 Date 5lll24 Span Value Instrument Zero Cal Response Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest System Upscale ResDonse 24.00 0.00 10.81 0. l4 0.37 t 0.88 I 1.00 21.70 -0.05 10.83 -0.06 -0.05 10.69 t0.62 390.00 0.04 193.95 -0.22 -0.04 197.04 197.02 50.10 0.09 25.03 0.53 1.77 24.76 25.82 49.00 0.01 2s.06 0.01 0.21 23.85 23 90 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest Span 0.58 1.54 0.29 0.79 -0.04 000 -0. s9 -0.89 -0.07 -0.02 0.79 079 0.88 3.35 -0.54 1.58 000 0.41 -2.47 -2.37 Drift (%) Zero Mid 0.96 0.50 0.04 -0.30 0.05 -0.0l 2.48 2.12 0.41 0. l0 47 of70 Bias/Drift Determ inations HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful. UTLocation: Source: Project No.: Unit 4 AST-2024-165 I t t I t I I T t t I I t I I I I I I I Parameter O, - Outlet CO' - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet SO: - Outlet Run 4 Date 5lll24 Span Value Instrument Zero Cal Response Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse 24.00 0.00 10.8 r 0.37 -0 10 I 1.00 10.58 23.70 -0.05 10.83 -0.05 0.01 10.62 10.68 390.00 0.04 I 93.95 -0.04 -0.22 197.02 196 82 50.r0 0.09 25.03 1.7'7 0.86 25.82 25 60 49.00 0.01 25.06 0.21 0.94 23.90 23.61 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest Span 154 0.42 0.79 096 000 0.2s 0.89 0.63 0.02 0.07 0.79 0.74 3.35 1.54 L58 t.t4 0.41 1.90 2.37 2.96 Drift (%) Zero Mid 1.96 1.75 0.25 0.2s -0.05 -0.05 -1.82 -0.44 t.49 -0 59 Run 5 Date 5lll24 Span Value Instrument Zero Cal Response Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Unscale Resoonse 24 00 0.00 10.81 0.3'7 -0. l0 I 1.00 10 58 23.70 -0.05 10 83 -0.05 0.01 t0.62 10 68 390.00 0.04 r 93.95 -0.04 -0.22 197.02 t96.82 50.1 0 0.09 25.03 1.77 0.86 25.82 25.60 49.00 0.0 r 25.06 0.21 0.94 23.90 23.61 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest SDan 1.54 0.42 0.79 0.96 0.00 0.25 0.89 0.63 0.02 0.07 0.79 0.74 3.3s 1.54 1.58 t.t4 0.41 1.90 2.37 2.96 Drift (%) Zero Mid 1.96 175 0.25 025 -0.05 -0.05 -t.82 -0.44 1.49 -0.59 Run 6 Date 5lll24 Span Value lnstrument Zero Cal Response lnstrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem IJnscale Resnonse 24.00 0.00 r 0.81 0.37 -0. r0 I 1.00 10.58 23.70 -0.0s 10.83 -0.05 0.01 t0.62 t0.68 390.00 0.04 193.95 -0.04 -0.22 197.02 196.82 50.10 0.09 2s.03 1.77 0.86 25.82 25.60 49.00 0.0r 25.06 0.21 0.94 23.90 23.61 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest Span 1.54 0.42 0.79 0.96 0.00 0.25 0.89 0.63 0.02 007 0.79 0.74 3.3s 1.54 1.58 l.l4 0.41 1.90 2.37 2.96 Drift (%) Zero Mid 1.96 1.75 0.25 0.25 -0.05 -0.05 -1.82 -0 44 1.49 -0.s9 48 of70 tl*"''t:::AIiarpe Bias/Drift Determ inations HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins. LLC - West Bountiful. UTLocation: Source: Project No.: Unit 4 AST-2024-165 l I t I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet SOr - Outlel Run 7 Date 5lll24 Span Value lnstrument Zero Cal Response Instrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Upscale ResDonse 24.00 0.00 10.81 -0.t0 0.20 10.58 10.98 23.70 -0.05 10.83 0.01 -0.03 10.68 10.70 390 00 0.04 r 93.95 -0.22 -0. l5 t96.82 196.50 50.10 0.09 25.03 0.86 0. l6 25.60 25.57 49.00 0.01 25.06 0.94 0.32 23.61 23.50 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest Soan 0.42 0.83 0.96 0.7 | 0.25 0.08 063 0.55 0.07 0.05 0.74 0.65 1.54 0. l4 l.l4 1.08 l90 0.63 2.96 318 Drift (%) Zero Mid 1.25 1.67 -0.17 0.08 0.02 -0 08 -1.40 -0.06 -t.27 -0.22 Run 8 Date 5lll24 Span Value lnstrument Zero Cal Response lnstrument Upscale Cal Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Upscale ResDonse 24.00 0.00 10.81 -0. l0 0.20 10.58 10.98 23.70 -0.05 10.83 0.01 -0.03 10.68 10.70 390.00 004 193.95 -0.22 -0. 15 196.82 I 96.50 50.10 0.09 25.03 0.86 0. l6 25.60 25.57 49.00 0.0 r 25.06 0.94 0.32 23.61 23.50 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest SDan 0.42 0.83 0.96 o.7 t 0.25 0.08 0.63 0.55 0.07 0.05 0.74 0.65 154 0. l4 l. l4 1.08 1.90 0.63 296 3. l8 Drifr (%) Zero Mid t.25 t.67 -0. l7 0.08 0.02 -0.08 -1.40 -0.06 -l .27 -0.22 Run 9 Date 5lll24 Span Value Instrument Zero Cal Response Instrument Upscale CaI Response Pretest System Zero Response Posttest System Zero Response Pretest System Upscale Response Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse 24.00 0.00 10.81 -0. l0 0.20 10.58 10.98 23.70 -0.05 10.83 0.01 -0.03 10.68 10.70 390.00 0.04 t93.95 -0.22 -0. l5 r96.82 I 96.50 50.10 0.09 25.03 0.86 0.16 25.60 25 57 49.00 0.01 25.06 0.94 0.32 23.6t 23.50 Bias (%) Pretest Zero Posttest Zero Pretest Span Posttest SDan 0.42 0.83 0.96 0.71 0.25 0.08 0.63 0.55 0.07 0.05 0.74 065 154 0. l4 l.l4 108 1.90 0.63 2.96 3. l8 Drift (%) Zero Mid 1.25 t.67 -0.17 0.08 0.02 -0.08 -1.40 -0.06 -1.27 -0.22 49 of70 EPA Method 205 Field Calibration of Dilution System Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Vlethod Criteria EPA asrameter 02 Makr Model S/N Seryomex t440 1420c-2 24.0 Cvlinder Number lD Zero Mid Hioh NA E80042240 cc'n9'136 Cylinder Certified Values Zero Mid Hioh u.0 10.99 24.O lnstrument Resoonse (7o or DDm) Zero Mid Hioh U.U I 1.0 24.0 Salibration Gas Selection (7o of Soan) Mid lIioh 45.8 100.0 lalibration Error Performance (7o of Snan) Zero Mid Hich (.,.{) 0.0 00 -ineztttv ("/o ol Ranse) 00 Analyzer Make : Anallzer Model; Analyzer SN: Environics lD: Component/Balance Gas: Cylinder Gas tD (Dilution): Servomex Tsrget Mass Flow Target Dilution lo/"r Terget Flow Rate lnm Target Conc€ntrstion lo/^\ Actual Concentration Anrlyzer Concentration Analyzer Concentrstion Analyzer Concentratior lo/"r AvcrrBr Analyzer Concentration to/^l Difference lo/^\ Average Error ( * 2./.1lOl tr 5.0 19.2 19.2 E9 9o t9 18.95 -0.25 5.0 l l.5 I 5 I 1.50 0.00 0.tJ"/o 4.8 4.8 4.8 4lt 49 4.82 0.0r o.30/"t0 4 2.4 2.4 24 44 0.03 t.2yo Anrlyzer Concentration lnjection I Error(*2"/,) Injection 2 Error ( * 2./", Injection 3 Error ( *2./ol 895 o.0v.0.20/o lt 50 -o 'A .o.0.oyo 442 -o t"0.6yo 244 oo t.zyo Mid-Level Suoolv Gas Calibration Direct io LAtrDraalon Gas Concentration(%l Injection I Analyzer Concentrationlo/^\ Injection 2 Analyzer Concentration I o/^\ rnJecuon, Analyzer Concentration Averrge Analyzer Concentrstion Difference lo/"1 Average Error l*2"/ol 10.99 10.8 10.8 tlJ. I 078 -o 2l -1.90 T t I I T T I t T T I I I I I I I I I AIhnce SOLJRCF'TFSTING Mass Flow Controller Calibration Note: The mass flow controller's calibration values are used by the dilution system's operatin8 software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not necessarily indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use. Calibration Performed By Ryan Lyons Dilution System Make: Dilution System Model: Dilution System S/N: Calibration Equipment Make: lAlicat Scientific calibration Equipment Model: lM-10sLPD/5MM-D/5M, M-1sLPM-D/51 Calibration Equipment S/N: lL972o6; L972oB Flow Cell S/N: ll972o8 Flow Cell S/N: 1797206 Calibration Gas: lNitrogen Barometric Pressure, mmHg: 125.6 Ambient Temperature, 'F: 172 Mass Flow Controller lD Size, ccm: Make: Model: s/N: #! 10,000 Environics 4040 455242003 #2 10,000 Environics 4040 4ss242004 #3 1,000 Environics 4040 455242002 Set Flow True Flow Difference cc/min cc/min Set Flow True Flow Difference cc/min cc/min Set Flow True Flow Difference cclmin cclmin 5% to% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 500 502 0.4% 1,000 1,015 L.5% 2,000 2,040 2.0% 3,000 3,060 2.o% 4,000 4,083 2.1% 5,000 5,093 t.9% 5,000 6,110 L.8% 7,000 7,t24 L.8% 8,000 8,150 1.9/o 9,000 9,L72 t.9% 10,000 Lo,2t4 21% 500 495 t.O% 1,000 L,oL4 t.4% 2,000 2,037 1.9% 3,000 3,057 1.9% 4,000 4,07t 7.8% 5,000 5,082 7.6% 5,000 5,100 7.7% 7,000 7,t30 7.9% 8,000 8,150 7.9% 9,000 9,L76 2.0% 10,000 t0,202 2.o% 50 47 5.8% 100 98 2.4o/o 200 199 O.3o/o 300 301 O.4o/o 400 403 0.6% 500 504 0.7% 600 505 0.9v" 700 709 t.2% 800 814 t.7% 900 919 2.2v 1,000 L,o28 2.8% oate 4126/23 5 I of70 T t -s-t=2_;-_ffit#*i.z:{:z-r' '..I' & -u*.TJlf*Accreditation ,62754 Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, A 71107 800-551 -81 50 PGVP Vendor lD t c12020 T I T T I I T t T T I t t I EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Cylinder Number: P.oduct lD Number: Cylinder Pressure: coA # Customer PO. NO.: Customer: 4c719736 127907 1900 PStG ,c71 9736.202008'l 0-0 Certification Date: Expiration Date: MFG Facility: Lot Number: Tracking Number: Previous Certification Dates: )4t1812020 )8t16120?A - Shreveoort - LA )c719736.20200810 )98506945 calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531, G1 I Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascall. Certified Concentration(s) Data Available Online. SMART.CERT Concentration 23.7 % 24.0 % Uncertainty r0.18 % *0.12% Analytical Princlple NDIR MPA Assayed On Carbon Dioxide Oxygen 08117t2020 08t18t2020 Balance Reference Standard(s) E8004 1 474.20 1 80504 E 80089906.20 1 90405 E80097E97.2017't018 1 162980025 06/03/2020 1 162980025 0712312020 I I I This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined speciflcations. This calibration/lesl was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measuremenl, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate applies only to the item described and shall nol be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when determining pass or fail. /\ tl bh-,* /Jo,ih Jasmine Godfrey Analytical Chemist Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS Version 02-J. Rovis6d on 2018-09-17 52 of '10 t I .*'{. ,,' ,.-ffi-'21.f)l:t & -uo-,f"**.-*Accreditation 162754 Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, LA 71107 800-5s1 -81 50 PGVP Vendor lD #G12023 EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS T I I I t t T I I I t T I I Cylinder Number: Product lD Number: Cylinder Pressure: coA # Customer PO. NO.: Customer: aBoo42?40 125371 1900 PSIG Certification Date: Expiration Date: MFG Facility: Lot Number: Tracking Number: Previous certifi cation Dates: 1U2912023 12127t2031 - ShreveDort - LA =8OO4224O.20231220 165 1 26635 This calibration standard has been certifled per the May 201 2 EPA Traceability Prolocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531, procedure G1. l Certif ied Concentration(s) Concenkation 10.97 % 10.99 % Uncertalnty *039 % 10.03 % Analytical Principle Assaysd On rbon Dioxide NDIR MPA 12t?9t2023 12t27nO23 Balance Analytical Measurement Oata Available Online SMART.CERT cc7 1 6408.20230't 09 cc749 1 45.202301 08 E80004315.20201022 E80014E30.20150605 12.003 % 20.03 % 24.75 0/. 953% t't62980025 12t18t2023 1 162980025 12t1412023 I t I This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verilied to meet the defined specilications. This calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/iesting process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced olher than in full, without written approval trom Red Ball Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when determining pass or fail. V1up,^.- l'h'tw Hayden Hartley Analyst Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS V6rsion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-'17 53 of 70 I T .'it..r,''1. -i' -t-,/_ r._ry*, /-.\:7 -',/1 \\.1' &o,*f,il*-* Accreditation ,#62754 Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, LA 71'107 800-ssl -81 s0 PGVP Vendor lD # c12021 T I t t I I T T I t T t I I EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Cylinder Number: Product lD Number: Cylinder Pressure: coA # Customer PO. NO.: Customer: =8004'1107 125722 1900 PS|G -80041107 .20210706-0 Certification Date: Expiration Date: MFG Facility: Lot Number: Tracking Number: Previous Certifi cation Dates: Jil2912021 07t27t2029 - shrevepon - LA E8004'l'107 20210706 165 1 58759 This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability protocol, Document 1, procedure G2 lDoNotUseThisCvlinderBelow1ooDsiqlo.7Meoaoas SMART.CERT Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On Monoxide 49.5 PPM *0.2 PPM FT|R OZt2Zt2O21Oxide 50.1 PPM t0.4 PPM Chemiluminescence O7t22l2O21,O7t2gt2O21Dioxide 49.0 PPM 10.12 PPM NDIR o7t12tzo2't,o7t26tzo21 043790.20160714 cc23a251 .20201222 cc726219.20190328 E80055345.20200424 G000G2A 06t1Et2021 1192604297 07t08t2021 017146467 07t22t2021 G000G2A 07t26t2021 1192604297 07t0&t2021 I I I This is to certify ihe gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of themeasuremenl parameters lo the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage factor of k=2 to approximate the g5% confidence level of the measurement, unless olherwise noted. This calibration certificate applies only to the ilem described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without wnlten approval from Red Ball Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when determining pass or fail. /\ Ll b,** /i4,rh Jasmine Godfrey Analytical Chemist Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS Version 02-J, Rovised on 2018-09-17 54 of '70 t T Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, LA 71107 800-551 -81 50 PGVP Vendor lD # c12019 I I t t I I T T t I t T t I Cylinder Number: Product lD Number: Cylinder Pressure: coA # Customer PO. NO.: Customer: )ctz't t36 124234 1900 PS|G Certification Date: Expiration Date: MFG Facility: Lot Number: Tracking Number: )2t11t2019 )2t0912027 - Shreveport - LA )c721736.20190207 )98493836 Analytical lnstrumentation Dateco FTIR MKS MKS 2o31DJG2EKVS13T 017146467 02toil201g SMART-CERT EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Previous Certification Dates: Concentration Uncertainty Analytical principle Assayed On 519 PPM t4 PPM E80014759EBoo14759'2o18o1o211l1gl2o26GMlSN2co7o5PPl\ilffi I I T This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verifled to meet the defined specifications. Thiscalibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards andTechnology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of themeasurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/lesting process. The expanded uncertainties use a coveragefactor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificjteapplies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red BallTechnical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when determining pass or fail. ryl Anthony Cyr Assistant Operations Manager Assay Laboratory: Red Batl TGS VeBion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17 55 of 70 I Atfferpe Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UT NOx Converter Efficiency Check Project No.: AST-2024- 165 1 T I I I I I I I I I t T t t t I I I NO, Converter Check - Outlet CAIIHifIilffi 600 Serial Number E03018 Cylinder ID Number EB0033l4C Cylinder Exp. Date 9ll4l% Cylinder ConcentratioD, DDrn 50"0 Pre-Test Date Time Pre-Test Concentration, ppm Pre-Test Efficiencv. 7o Post-Test Date 5lll24 Time 17:04 Post-Test Con..niililii-, pp,r, 4g.u Post-Test Efficiencv. %o 100*Required Efficiency is > 90 % 56 of70 T T -.i''\\ //''?, ffi*:r':,=i-l z- // ,a \..\' Red Ball Technical Gas Service 555 Craig Kennedy Way Shreveport, LA 71107 800-5s1 -81 50 PGVP Vendor lD # c'l?023 I I T t I I I I I I T I T I I I I Cylinder Number: Product lO Number: Cylinder Pressure: coA # Customer PO. NO.: Customer: =80033 140 124131 1900 PStG :DUUJJ I4U.ZUZJU6Z4-U Certif ied Co ncentration(s) Analytical Measurement )9t't512023 )9114t2026 - Shreveoort - LA :B0033 140.20230824 156 /6001 1 SMART-CERT /\d*^*/w"? Jasmine Godfrey Analytical Chemist Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-,l7 Certification Date: Expiration Date: MFG Facility: Lot Number: Tracking Number: This is lo certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined speciflcations. Thiscalibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards andTechnology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of themeasurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coveragefactor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certific;leapplies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced olher than in full, without written approval from Red BallTechnical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account when determining pass or fail. EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Previous Certification Dates: Concentratlon Uncertainty IO.5 PPM Analytical Principle Assayed On Nitrogen Dioxide 5O.O PPM FTIR 09 lo1 t2023, 09t 1 5t2023 Balance EB0o573o1EBoo573o1'2o2o1o2oo5to4l2o26GMlSAlR MKS 203,IDJG2EKVS13T MKS 2O31DJG2EKVSl3T 017116467 08t31t2023 017146,t67 09t15t2023 57 of 70 AST-2024-I605 I T I t VFR T I t I I t I I t T T I T I I E:Aliarpe Location Source Project No. Parameter(s): HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refin LLC - West Boun l-lnit 4 QA Data Date Pitot ID Evidence of damase? Evidence of mis-alisnment? Calibration or Repair required? 5^/24 PT-08 no no no Date Probe or Thermocouple ID Reference Temp. (oF1 Indicated Temp. (oF1 Difference Criteria 5/l /24 P708-2 67.4 68.0 0.1%+15y. Field Balance Check Date 05t0U24 Balance ID:ML35-l Test Weight ID:SLC-4 Certified Weisht (s)'1000.0 Measured Weisht (s)999.8 Weisht Difference (p)0.2 Date Barometric Pressure Evidence of damase? Reading Verified Calibration or Repair required?Weather Station Location 51U24 Weather Station NA NA NA Salt Lake City, UT Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check 5ilt24 MB706 Pass 58 of 70 I I ,:Alrre!o le:: 'itii ,r; DGM Calibration-Orifices Document lI 620.004 Revisior 22.3 Effective Dan 12/16/22 lssuinq Departmenl Tech Services Pag(1of'l T Console lD. MB-706 Meter S/N: 283355 Critical Orifice S/N: 1330 Calibration DetailT T I I I I T t I lnitial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (pb) Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (pbF) Average Barometric Pressure, in. Hq (pb) 25.54 25.54 25.54 Critifcal Orifice lD (y) K' Factor, ft3.Rrz / in. WC min (K) Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (Vr) lnitial DGM Volume, ftl (Vmr) Final DGM Volume, ftr (VmF) Total DGM Volume, ftr (Vm) 1330-31 0.8429 150 423.941 434.837 10.896 1330-31 1330-25 0.6728 150 449922 458 683 8.761 1330-25 1330-19 0 5186 17.0 474.495 481.430 6 935 1330-19 0.8429 0 673 0 519 150 434.737 445.698 10.96'1 15.0 458 683 467.443 8.760 17.0 481.430 488.317 6.887 Ambient Temperature, 'F Cfa) lnitlal DGM Temperature, "F (Imr) Final DGM Temperature,'F Omr) Averaqe DGM Temperature, "F ( Tm) 83 81 81 81 84 81 82 82 84 82 83 83 84 83 84 84 85 84 o) 85 86 85 85 85 Elapsed Time (O) Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH) Standard Meter volume, ftr (Vmstd) Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr) Meter Correction Factor (Y) Tolerance Orifice Calibration Value (AH @) Tolerance Orifice Cal Check 10.00 330 9.1653 9.2410 1.008 0.008 1 828 0.094 10 00 3.30 9.2114 9.2325 1.002 0.002 '1.830 0.092 10 00 2.20 7.3259 7.3694 1.006 0 006 1.905 0 017 10.00 2.20 7.3116 7.3694 1.008 0.008 1.902 0.020 10 00 1.40 5.7645 5.6752 0.985 0.016 2.032 0.110 10.00 1.40 5.7194 5 670 0 991 0.009 2.034 0.112 175 1.92 1.89 Veter Correction Factor 01 1.000 Jrifice Calibration Value (AH (al 1.922rositive Pressure Leak Check Yes Reference Calibrator Make: OMEGA Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A Reference Calibrator S/N: T-197207 Calibration Detail I I I I t I I Reference Temp.Display Temo AccuracV Difference OF oR oF oR oF 0 68 100 460 528 560 0 66 98 460 526 558 0.0 0.4 0.4 0 2 2 223 248 273 683 708 733 223 248 273 683 708 733 0.0 0.0 00 0 0 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1.200 760 860 960 1,060 1,i60 1,260 1,360 1,460 1,560 1,660 300 398 498 599 701 801 901 1,002 1,102 1,202 760 858 958 1,059 1,161 1,261 1,361 1,462 1,562 1.662 0.t 0., 0., 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0 ) 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Personnel 9/7/2023 59 of70 Calibration By Calibration Date Amos Omer I I I t I I t I t T I I t t I I I t I 60 of70 .9GEEaEor1 ?ii ,{ of,E oo.E5 o3iio= Nco ooo ?)Eft) ?)E DjtaoE N!cao ?DU, qoE oo.E ){xoE !o) Nii , IIIt) u?.E5 ocixa= No') qii, no@NE5 ox,as xos Nco NDii ,4 otsE oo.E= oNxo N,cpo !ii , P,)IE s c!x@= No OO @ T N O O N h O T N O @ t N O O F O F sY s s s f r s s v s s s s s t oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ILoait e d8 6 3e - :)oLo=(rI8s s (/ ) + 6 39 > loLoc,JN2a e 3e - 9 f,L3F - g iE s Hg ()()-LX= . uz f zs E Se > fL=o-(Le3 s 3E S f(JoL8coi " 3U : ft r s ou l - Ps O- N O S O @ f @O O F N O + 6 @ N 6 o o h6 0 0 6 Q o o o o o o o o o o o o o o + " oi o i o i G i 6i s i 6i ci o i n i c i a j r ! fi s i r , . j a i r , , r i ci ,E 5 5 5; 5 5 ; ; : I5 : 5 ; ; 5 5 5 5 5 5 I- O I O I OT N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 6I h oo o o o o o o o o o o d d d 6 6 6 6 6 d ; q q s q, E t {! a ! N a a {: s a q E E a e! cr AF F u o0 o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o6 0 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 o o o o o o o o o o o < ) o o o o o o o o - q c. ! q c2 o q c l e q @ @ F @ o r + r o o @ F o @ @ @ 6 6 i ; ci o d ci - si d r r r r r, 6i ; d oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o q 09 N r .! c ! 6 { u? c ? c! c ! q u? q oc 0 q ol 6l . ! , : a NN N N N N N N F F F N N N N - r: { Q O F F O OO o N O@ F N o o a N @ r @ r O @ O - o @O @ @ o @ @ O A N @ O d , oo @ r @ t s @ = @ @ @ 6 N @ O O O @ r @ 6 r - * * < + + + + $ $ - ri s s r + + + + + 6l of 7 0 IItIIItIIIITIIItTII HIEI ,2ir !t NDNE 3o= oc,aG5 Nc,o ?fii, oE3 qo.! '= oiio= Noa) ?ii , ?fE 3fUt cxo5 Nco() oNo 4Ncn !E aNo:' Ncoa! riii , 1)pNc, Ii'5 oq,tio= !o) oit oooEta o0 ,iio5 NuF,o qo ojDE q.;= Noxo= N,o,t ro l : u ? 0 9 E S S @ o o o o @ o F F o o r @ +t o o o o o o o o $ q < o o $ r 6 - + + oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o 6 0 0 0 0 0 ILo>i l - o dH F se - loOu()=&8s e (, o - = Ec ; lOLocoJNO= o As ) a 33 - 9 lOLN-3F _ g lY o ol + > [=o(L6= s 3 u- > fI=o-o-oe c st € ov - fooI8cO7 . sp i o tl. J - Pa - FN O S @ @ r @ O O F N O $ 0 @ F @ O O F - r r q! g ! q\ 9{ q! q! q ! i{ ql n e c? o ai. i c i c i F i a j ci o o o o o o o o o o o o o o E_ - i: N x x x s x x N x x x N x x x g d d E d B ;O a O o o O o o o o c t O d c i a J t qq EE a q q { ! qe as r a q aa a Q a Q e AF F" E fi E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E oo o o o o o \ q, : c! q -, : q N o @ @ o o N N a @ e F { o F N c, + + s i r, @ + - r c t d cj qj r o 6 i r j d O O O O O a O O ' : O O O O O o O O O O o O o oo o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o a r y t: a oq -': 09 N N @ @ N + o o o F @ 6 o NN N N F N N - ;- 6i . i . i . i 6 i - - - s3 5 R 5 5 R 3 3 3 h 3 3 $ E B E S S T E @@ t s @ F @ @ o @ o 6 0 0 6 @ @ @ r @ N @ + + + + r, + s - * r - - + + + = * q - ; ; 62 of 70 IIttITtIIIItTIItITI q6EEl)oo., o\lii , NoE D,!5 ,5i'iot Nc=o qoo c,E= ou= oG Not) q6, oE )j= )iio5 N5o() o?o oqoEa a.!= 4C,ixo= \c5o) ,o P,\ED oEI 4oiio Nc=o opii' orE5 oo= oiao= N!c-o @+ii , q?OEo +t'5 6x65 Nco N O N !Q S O 0 q N O t N O O @ N F S O @ @ O 9! f r Q @ - o < S ! @ r O O 9 { { t t + < oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 6 o o 6 o -LOatt e u6 s 3= - louoEo8s g (,L =3g ; fooLooJN9a e o+ > )orot3F g aE s [3oo-(L5s s z o- ; Bg ; looLo=o-(ro€ o {[ iO- - foLDc oz -. sl t l 5 ou = :f ( r i ou - gs N o r+ o @ t s aO o F N O v 6 @ r€ o o F N I ? t t ? q? n ql $ : : t i * * * t * = E e Yi o oo m o m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o - r i cF F := 93 t + S ! t q v + t t e = + + + + + + + r NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N . i I t e I Q I I I a a a O o o a i c t 6 a i a i 6 a i ii t t E Eq q q a q E E a q q q q a a e Q { E 8 s AF F " QQ e A Q Q a e a e a Q e e a Q Q e e e e 88 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 c! I 9 ' l I a .! cl q t u? a ? o? c! a q I q eZ oq .t tO N @ f F O t < F O O @ O O b < < O i F g O O O O o o o OO O a O O O o O O': O O o oo o o o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o N a? u ? . . u ? \ q g o o o F o o @ r @ N N N 6 NN N - - 6 j o j 6 i - - - - ; ; - . i aQ O N r O O N @ q) (p O O F F O @ O O @ r @ @@ o o @ r @ @ @ o @ - a @ F @ o 6 r o 6 a q = q cl q a c? q q u, t \ q o? q D o r F N r = < s $ o s 6 o r I == + + r, - { { rj i s 63 of 70 IItIIIIIIItItItITIt N3i; )oIEJ Nc5 ox6= N5or) oo qE Dj= otaq= \o) ?)it( DjE Io= co,ios Nc=o qNUt qoE5 E ilNxGE Ng,o e?ii l roNNE6 oEs o= Ncot) oo @FE ao.! ' xo No oqii l omEn ot5 dioI NTc=oat S ! " , l: . , @ @ O r F (, 6 N F - O O o r n F O O 83 3 3 8 3 3 s 8 s 3 S s 8 8 9 s 3 3 8 3 TLa>+ o dH . =3 ) lL r@ F N O @ r F @ { { o @ F 6 O F r r @ o rj 6 i 6i e j 6 i 6j - - 6i - - di + rj .i a ; a ; d ; ; ,:, : , : ' : o o , : o o F F o oo o o o a o c t c t c i c i d c j c j d d oo o o o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o c! c? a \ oq - c! q, : N N , : ' : c ? N q N N o @ @ NN N F F N N F N r o s i 6 j s i - ; ; RF 8 E 6 S S S E 8 g 3 8 3 R E S 3 3 X o=(I(IHS : 3c j fOoLoc0JN9a s <q 6 o3 > luIN-o=FE i o5; e zo - = 3c 5 loIo=tro€ q 3E S foL @ o @ F o N @ o \ og o q \ \ q c q \ oq \ q 6 o? go o ri- < s $ n < s{ { s t r $ qs . r oF N o 9 h 6 r @ O O F N O S 6 @ r 6 0 0 a T : : :: l: - r - - F N N N N N q! st f l C t at q] o +s + + + i + + + + + + + + s = = r $ i * EF F i= s : q y : 9 s v ! 9 gf y y s s = $ v s i n + E E R E A E E E E E R R H R R H H R R R R R " Q E E 9 g =: E EE EE EE E EE E E E E 66 6 6 6 6 f oo o o o o c 64 of 70 IITIIIIIIIITIIIItII ooEEauG ooo orNI oNo.!= ox \troJ )6. , @E o= diiG= \o ?)ii ,{ ?3E oo5 qoxo= No ?\ii rd ri N.gs @c.jiio= Nc3o 4:ii , '!,NE-D q!s ni(oE No tDi, oE oD!E oooE NE5o Pii, a?,=t> N(5 DoI Nc5oat ON N N € @ O O r @ O O t T O O N N O F F t$ 9 t o o o o o o o N o o o N o o N o o oa o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o roa>=Bt e L6 S 3E - :)Io0-Us s AL =3c i foouao)N9a s +9 6 o= > loLUT 3f ; - 3 aE s [=o(L5s g zo - = 3c j loo(Lo-o€ c ov - lLBp3f i g 3H E OU - Pc FN m t 6 @ t s @ O O r N O t 6 @ t s O O O F oo o o o o o o a { t * + 9 t 9 s + { o a ., + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ =F F ,E s * + + $ t s s v r i = ! s = i s r i i 9 F N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o E N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Xr F u oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o6 0 6 6 D h 6 D 6 6 0 6 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o \ o? r: n c? ' : c ! o q @ r s N N @ r o @ o o o @ d ; r o ci 6 o o e i o i 6 i + @ 6 d d - s - r @ oo o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o F6 @ t r @ @ N O N cq r: r: ': e? o l 0 q ': FF N N N F F N NN N N F F F N F N F F FO O F O N O T O O T O O O N t T T O T @ Or D F @ N N @ @ O f @ r @ @ @ @ O @ @ f f{ N @ F D 6 @ @ @ O 6 6 D D F @ r O O N s< + + o - - t { { q - q - - + t + - t q 65 of 70 IIIIIITIIIttIIIIIIt ooEEaoo mo6l oo@E oo.Hs oxo Nco:) ?)itn ?3n o5 o N!cao:l ?Dit ?,E o.Es o,G= N,cto ?\it 4NE 6.cs rc, i!io Nco:) .j:ii , ,?oNE oci5 aNiio Naoa! o@ii , @o6E3 o.u Noo= \o) oo aoE= c!.E= nox6= N,ofl oF o N N t s T O O O N 6 O @ F O O O F o O 6o o o o o o s $ o 9 o F N r F r o $ 9 o oo a o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o ILoit e Ld 6 ! o 3E - lLo-L8= g og 6 35 > f()oLa(oJNO= o av ) a 33 9 loL8eqU H Qf i > HCo(Lo-5s e zq 6 s5 ) olooLo=I(Lo€ e 3E S looLUp oZ a gH i (J U - fl a - No + o @ t s @ o o F N o t n @ r @ O O F N D6 6 0 D O O 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ", + + + + $ + + + di ti ' i i fi th n 6 ' i i t t ' i i i i # rb X- r ,E + < $ t t v{ $ * t { t t t t t i t t t t F N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > d d 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N XF F u oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 6 n O D oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o rN r O @ 6 @ r { @ o @ S 6 O O @ O @ N r r s - ct - 6i ei + ri 6 < i < i r - qi d - oi . i - o; oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o TT O N N N N O t s o T F O N N T T F @ N o NN N NF N F N N N F N F F N NN r o o N o o F o r @ o o N o o N o @ F NN F @ r O O N @ @ 6 @ @ @ O @ O r @ @ F rr < @ @ @ O O O N F T O @ N O O r o o o {r r s s < * q - d 6 + + + i t - + F F < 66 of 70 IIIIIIIIIIITIT oGEEooo:! oc6, DInEIt roI ooG= Nu,oat qoii, q)h ?f= )os No D36, qoE cc= )iaoE \co r{No 4o;tt) olo= \NG N=o,! No n@NE 4t u?@,iG No oE; @NNE= ooi= D+G5 NJo o,it oq@oEt qE= 0rixo= !co:) r@ O @ r @ N A O F $ r O O @ @ N O O O @ NN o N N N O O O O O F F o o o O o O O O oo o o o o o o o o o o o o a o o o o o o xLa=- it s J( J = r( / ) s 33 - foL(.)E(Lo-8s g at =Bc ; fLo6)NO: o av ) a *q 6 oJ > f(. )OLo-x^ - . o= 5 zo - z =5 j oluo-Io€ e <[ {O- ' loL8c oz -. s- . u 5 ou = fE - : (J U - Pc $n @ F Q O O F N O S D @ r € O O F N O < oo o o o o $ $ 9 t t s s i = = o o 6 0 6 ., i j , i ' i ti' i r i ' i ti f i f i i i ri' t ii rh fi rii f i ti t t i rh rh i i rb F- - := {t t $ { t 3 t { = 9 i $ $ v i t a t $ i F N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ; oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ; N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N XF F u oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o6 0 6 0 n o 6 0 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o a a o o o o? @ q. ! q? q? q ry o N o o o o r r o O < @ o N F oo N q - ci 6 r j d - o d d o d -. i . i si o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o , : , : r: , : , : a oo o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o \ q u? q 1 q' l q q c? c ! q 6i q q ry .? N q c? - q NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N F F O o@ @ N o s o o 6 s o @ @ D @ @ * o F r r OO @ O O r r r @ O N O S O O F T @ r O N c? e 2 a o? u ? c ? e ? c ? q \ q (q c! a? q u? \, : q !' l u? t< < + t < + + s t { + $ 3 i { + 6 0 6 6 67 of 7 0 IItIIIIIITIITIIIIII ooEEaoGt! tc?ii , )N;5h 3E ooo)ao \troJ ) qEf Dcs oiio5 ! qcii, ?)E5 DjEt qoiiG= No Noiit E )5 ataos Nco rlDii, oDNI5 qoi qoxG5 Nco oo N@oEU) EtE poxoE Noat Noo oooEtU) \o :oiioE \co) O@ O O O O @ N O { 6 @ q O N T O O N N O oo N o F o < 6 6 o o { q t o o + { o o 6 oo o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o -o q o l q ao o q u? q. q q 9 c? e o r @ r 6 F @ o o @ o r r o @ r @ r N o @ t c i + ri - ri < ri @ + + ri @ -Loa=a>* o tr 6 r o 33 - f()OIEod8s e (,L =Bg ; looLaoJN60 3 <q 6 o= > f(-)oLot r 3F 3 lY o oi + > oX (. )=L(Lx^ - . o> x zo - z Bc ; looro(Loe e sf , € O- ' f()LBs oz -. -U Y do = lI iou ' Ps D@ r @ O O F N O { 6 @ N 6 O O F N O S 0 o6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . rb r i i l b d i rb d 6 d i d i i 6 . b i i d 6 <b (i i di 6 d d ,E + * $ < t $ + r n 9 r = s 9 t r ! { { s r F N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ' NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N XF r u oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o -F O O F F oo o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o a *q c! ' : c? c4 ol o? a a 0q q? u? - a' : - oo o o o o o o o o o o o F F F rr N @ @ @ @ $ 6 o F o @ o N O o 6 o o o @9 @ s r + o O F $ @ @ F o @ o o o r r r NN N N T 6 @ @ N @O @ F @ @ @ @ @ @ @ O 6 { N @ 6 6 r o @ F ri r ci - ri r ; r i - - r; r i r ; r ; r i r i r ; r ; d r i ri 68 of 7 0 IItIItIIIITIIItIIII .9oEEoo(1 o3U, oNNE oo.!= @6G No )o NE o5 ox-o5 Naoa) ooa c3cn )ji )i,iot No @ii , a?oo;cI qe= oqNiio \o oii , :l0)E 0aE5 aoNi,ao, Nc,o,] it NoE Nt-= NNxo5 \o) ?2ii ){ q?E Ns odiiGs NEfo OO O O F @ @ N N S O @ S F O O @ @ $ @ O D O O $ O O O O O 6 0 0 6 @ O O O 6f ) < $ oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o :ELo>eBt I r6 S33 - lou()o-(LUs g 3L s foLo.oJN9a e 33 S lL3F 3 lY o ol + > oX L=o(Lx^ - . o> 3 vL i oloL=(Io€ e <f { O- zo()u8pEE * OU - gc @F @ O O F N O t O @ t s @ O O F N 6 + 6 @ I: : : r t : q! q! $ c! n q! q ! fl * c! c? cl q? c? q? ql e o @@ @ @ o @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ F- - r= 3 1 9 9 $ { S $ + i V * r $ r + r $ r $ v F S / S I C { N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N }; OO O O O O O O OO O O O O c ' . ' C t O C t 6 6 ; ql Q a q a { E q Q ! t { { ! q a s ! a a E q oo o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 66 0 0 6 6 h 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 oo a o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o 6 0 6 \u ? \ n u ? \ q 9 @ F @ N 6 o N 6 o r @ @ @ o o @ o o r d e i d < i r d ; N 6 d d d FN - N N N N F d o c i d d d o o o o c i c i o d o o o o o o o oo o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o .! a' l - c? c ? q? e? a q c! c ? ' : a ? q? 0g \ t o? a u? e NN N N N F N N N rS S @ F o N @ F T O N O T O @ F F N O N o@ { o @ o o $ o o @ @ @ o @ r r @ o F N a a !'l e ? q a ? a c2 09 q \ ol r : u? r: , : 6l ol q a c'l no o @ o 6 0 0 s r < + 9 $ o o o < $ s t 69 of 7 0 ItIIIIttIItTIIttTII I I I I I I I I I I t I I I t I t I T ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF AIR OUALITY UTAH DEPARTMENT JUL - 2 2024 70 of70 HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 Source Information Company Name Holly Frontier Company Contact:Matt Howes Contact Phone No.801-397-7412 Stack Designation:FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 Test & Review Dates Test Date:5/1/2024 Review Date: 10/23/2024 Observer:Not Observed Reviewer:Rob Leishman Emission Limits Emission Rates SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. ppm 50.0 80.0 500.00 0.499 16.162 84.997 %O2 Correction as a whole #0.00 0.00 0.00 Test Information Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static) Ps Stack Pressure 40.00 8.727 1.0000 1.922 0.84 25.65 -0.2 25.635294 Contractor Information Contact:Austin Keough Contracting Company: Alliance Source Testing Address: 2855S 500 W Sutie A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 Phone No.: (385) 722-6712 Project No.: Division of Air Quality Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements Round Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas Fd Fw Fc dscf/MMBtu wscf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu Diluent F factor used O2 CO2 Anthracite 2 Bituminous 2 Lignite Natural Propane Butane 10100 COAL OIL GAS 9780 9860 9190 8710 8710 8710 10540 10640 11950 320 10610 10200 10390 1970 1800 1910 1420 1040 1190 1250 Wet CEM Correct For O2 CO2 Interference w/CO Yes Yes Yes HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Company Holly Frontier Point Source FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 Test Date 5/1/24 Start Time End Time Run CO2 % CO PPM NOx PPM O2 % SO2 lb/hr SO2 PPM Flow MSCFH Headers Here Headers Here Headers Here Headers Here Headers Here 12:50 13:11 1 14.8 82 13.6 2.1 0 0 1043000 13:11 13:32 2 14.8 76 13.3 2 0 0 1039000 13:32 13:53 3 14.8 85 11.9 1.9 0 0 1026000 14:10 14:31 4 14.8 84 13.3 2 0 0.1 1027000 14:31 14:52 5 14.8 84 13.9 2 0 0.1 1035000 14:52 15:13 6 14.8 80 13.2 2 0 0 1033000 15:34 15:55 7 14.6 101 11.7 2.2 0 0 1031000 15:55 16:16 8 15.7 194 13.3 0.7 0 0.1 1043000 16:16 16:37 9 15 77 19.3 1.8 0 0.1 1054000 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Division of Air Quality NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification Holly Frontier FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 SO2 Analyzer:Serial No.: CO2 Analyzer:Serial No.: Acquisition System:Serial No.: Acquisition System: Serial No.: Equivalent Emission Limit:50 Test Date SO2 Dry SO2 Dry SO2 Test Date % CO2 Dry 5/1/2024 RM CEMS Diff RM CEMS Diff RM CEMS Diff 5/1/2024 RM CEMS Diff Run#Start Time End Time ppm lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. Run# Start Time End Time %c %c 1 12:50 13:11 Y 0.0 0 0.00 -0.02 0 1 12:50 13:11 Y 15.5 14.8 0.70 2 13:11 13:32 Y 0.0 0 0.00 -0.03 0 2 13:11 13:32 Y 15.6 14.8 0.79 3 13:32 13:53 Y 0.0 0 0.00 -0.03 0 3 13:32 13:53 Y 15.6 14.8 0.80 4 14:10 14:31 Y 0.0 0.1 -0.10 -0.10 0 4 14:10 14:31 Y 15.6 14.8 0.76 5 14:31 14:52 Y 0.0 0.1 -0.10 -0.16 0 5 14:31 14:52 Y 15.6 14.8 0.80 6 14:52 15:13 Y 0.0 0 0.00 -0.16 0 6 14:52 15:13 Y 15.6 14.8 0.78 7 15:34 15:55 Y 0.0 0 0.00 -0.08 0 7 15:34 15:55 Y 15.3 14.6 0.74 8 15:55 16:16 Y 0.0 0.1 -0.10 -0.05 0 8 15:55 16:16 Y 16.5 15.7 0.77 9 16:16 16:37 Y 0.0 0.1 -0.10 -0.05 0 9 16:16 16:37 Y 15.6 15 0.62 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 Average = 0.0 0.04 0.04 Average = 15.640 14.900 0.749 Sd Standard Deviation = 0.05 Sd Standard Deviation = Sd Standard Deviation = Sd Standard Deviation = 0.06 Confidence Coefficient = 0.04 Confidence Coefficient = Confidence Coefficient = Confidence Coefficient = 0.043 RA - Relative Accuracy = RA RA RA - Relative Accuracy =5.06% n = 9 0 0 n = 9 or RA of 1%0.74% t0.975 = 2.306 t0.975 = 2.306 E.L. Relative Accuracy = 0% 0.17% a For steam generators;b Average of three samples;9 c Make sure that RM and M data are on a consistent basis either wet or dry. 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 2 For SO2 and NOx Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 13.2 Relative accuracy Performance Specification. The RA of the CEMSS must be not greater than 20 percent when RM is used in the denominator of Eq. 2-6 (average emissions during test are greater than 50 percent of the emission standard)or 10 percent when the applicable emission standard is used in the denominator of Eq. 2-6 (average emissions during test are less than 50 percent of the emission standard). Up dated January 17, 2006 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 3 For O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy Perfromance Specification. The RA of the CEMS must be no grater than 20 percent of the mean value of the reference method (RM) data. 1 percent O2 or CO2. The results are also acceptable if the absolute value of the difference between the mean RM value and the mean CEMS value is less than or equal to 1.0 percent O2 (or CO2). Up dated September 14, 2016 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 6 For Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring Systems (CERMS) 13.2 CERMS Relative Accuracy. The RA of the CERMS shall be no greater than 20 percent of the mean value of the RM's test data in terms of the nits of the emission standard, or 10 percent of the applicable standard, which err is greater. Up dated January 17, 2006 Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Teledyne Monitor Labs - TML-50 SO276 Ac t i v a t e R u n ? PassedPassed HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Division of Air Quality Relative Accuracy Test Audit of Holly Frontier FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 NOX Analyzer:Serial No.: O2 Analyzer:Serial No.: Acquisition System:Serial No.: Acquisition System: Serial No.: Equivalent Emission Limit:80.00 Date NOx Dry NOx Dry NOx Test Date % O2 Dry 5/1/2024 RM CEMS Diff RM CEMS Diff RM CEMS Diff 9/30/2014 RM CEMS Diff Run#Start Time End Time ppm lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. Run# Start Time End Time %c %c 1 12:50 13:11 Y 13.9 13.6 0.3 1.52 1 12:50 13:11 Y 2.7 2.1 0.569 2 13:11 13:32 Y 14.3 13.3 1.0 1.57 2 13:11 13:32 Y 2.6 2 0.554 3 13:32 13:53 Y 13.1 11.9 1.2 1.46 3 13:32 13:53 Y 2.5 1.9 0.643 4 14:10 14:31 Y 15.9 13.3 2.6 1.76 4 14:10 14:31 Y 3.1 2 1.110 5 14:31 14:52 Y 16.8 13.9 2.9 1.86 5 14:31 14:52 Y 3.1 2 1.139 6 14:52 15:13 Y 16.4 13.2 3.2 1.80 6 14:52 15:13 Y 2.9 2 0.922 7 15:34 15:55 Y 16.9 11.7 5.2 1.81 7 15:34 15:55 Y 2.7 2.2 0.494 8 15:55 16:16 Y 17.4 13.3 4.1 1.90 8 15:55 16:16 Y 1.3 0.7 0.646 9 16:16 16:37 Y 20.8 19.3 1.5 2.28 9 16:16 16:37 Y 2.5 1.8 0.728 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 Average = 16.2 13.7 2.440 Average = 2.610 1.850 0.756 Sd Standard Deviation = 1.60 Sd Standard Deviation = Sd Standard Deviation = Sd Standard Deviation = 0.24 Confidence Coefficient = 1.226 Confidence Coefficient = Confidence Coefficient = Confidence Coefficient = 0.186 RA - Relative Accuracy = Relative Accuracy = Relative Accuracy = RA - Relative Accuracy =36.09% n = 9 0 0 n = 9 or RA of 1%0.76% t0.975 = 2.306 t0.975 = t0.975 = t0.975 = 2.306 E.L. Relative Accuracy = 20% 4.58% EMRA EMRA a For steam generators;b Average of three samples; c Make sure that RM and M data are on a consistent basis either wet or dry. 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 2 For SO2 and NOx Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 4. Performance and Equipment Specifications 4.3 Relative accuracy. The RA of the CEMSS shall be no grater than 20 percent of the mean value of the RM test data in terms of the units of the emission standard or 10 percent of the applicable standard, whichever is greater For SO2 emission standards between 0.30 and 0.20 lbs./MMBtu use 15 Percent of the applicable standard; For SO2 emission standards below 0.20 lbs./MMBtu use 20 Percent of the emission standard; 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 3 For O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 12. Calculate the arithmetic difference between the RM and the CEMSS output for each run. The average of the nine (of more) data sets constitute the RA. 13.2 Relative accuracy. The RA of the CEMSS must be no grater than 1 percent O2 or CO2. 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 6 For Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring Systems (CERMS) 13.2 CERMS Relative Accuracy. The RA of the CERMS shall be no greater than 20 percent of the mean value of the RM's test data in terms of the nits of the emission standard, or 10 percent of the applicable standard, which err is greater. Up dated January 17, 2006 ZX-9900-S1153Ametek -9900RM Ametek -9900RM ZX-9900-S1153 Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Ac t i v a t e R u n ? PassedPassed HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Division of Air Quality Relative Accuracy Test Audit of Holly Frontier FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 CO Analyzer:Serial No.: Acquisition System: Acquisition System: Serial No.: Equivalent Emission Limit:500.00 Date CO Dry CO Dry CO 5/1/2024 RM CEMS Diff RM CEMS Diff RM CEMS Diff Run#Start Time End Time ppm lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. 1 12:50 13:11 Y 74.22 82 7.78 4.94 2 13:11 13:32 Y 65.85 76 10.15 4.41 3 13:32 13:53 Y 79.20 85 5.80 5.36 4 14:10 14:31 Y 73.76 84 10.24 4.97 5 14:31 14:52 Y 73.99 84 10.01 5.00 6 14:52 15:13 Y 75.56 80 4.44 5.04 7 15:34 15:55 Y 100.05 101 0.95 6.52 8 15:55 16:16 Y 153.93 194 40.07 10.25 9 16:16 16:37 Y 68.41 77 8.59 4.56 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Average = 85.00 95.89 10.89 Sd Standard Deviation = 11.37 Confidence Coefficient = 8.741 RA - Relative Accuracy = n = 9 0 0 t0.975 = 2.306 E.L. Relative Accuracy = 17%3.93% a For steam generators;b Average of three samples; c Make sure that RM and M data are on a consistent basis either wet or dry. 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 4 For Carbon Monoxide (CO) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems applicable emission standard is used to calculate RA. 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 4A For Carbon Monoxide (CO) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 13.2 Relative accuracy. The RA of the CEMSS must be no greater than 10 percent when the average RM value is used to calculate RA, 5 percent when the applicable emission standard is used to calculate RA, or within 5 ppmv when the RA is calculated as the absolute average difference between the RM and CEMSS plus the 2.5 percent confidence coefficient. 40 CFR 60 Performance Specification 6 For Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring Systems (CERMS) 13.2 CERMS Relative Accuracy. The RA of the CERMS shall be no greater than 20 percent of the mean value of the RM's test data in terms of the nits of the emission standard, or 10 percent of the applicable standard, which err is greater. Up dated January 17, 2006 CO2007 13.2 Relative accuracy. The RA of the CEMSS must be no grater than 10 percent when the average of the RM value is used to calculate RA or 5 percent when the Passed Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Ac t i v a t e R u n ? Teledyne Monitor Labs - TML-30 HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Test Overview NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification Holly Frontier Point Source FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 Contact Phone No.Matt Howes Stack Designation:FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 Project No.:0 Run Run # 1 Run # 2 Run # 3 Run # 4 Run # 5 Run # 6 Run # 7 Run # 8 Run # 9 Run # 10 Run # 11 Run # 12 Test Date 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 Start Time 12:50 13:11 13:32 14:10 14:31 14:52 15:34 15:55 16:16 Stop Time 13:11 13:32 13:53 14:31 14:52 15:13 15:55 16:16 16:37 Run Time 0:21 0:21 0:21 0:21 0:21 0:21 0:21 0:21 0:21 Stack I.D. (inches)40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 As ft^2 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 8.73 Cp (Pitot Tube Coefficient)0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Yd Meter Y Factor (unit less)1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Pbar Barometric Pressure ("Hg)25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 25.65 Pq (Static Pressure)-0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 -0.20 Ps (Pressure of the Stack)25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 25.64 Ts Stack Temp Avg. oF 151.60 149.70 150.90 147.60 149.50 149.20 148.40 145.50 145.00 Tm Meter Temperature oF 80.00 80.00 80.00 83.00 83.00 83.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 CO2 (carbon dioxide)15.50 15.59 15.60 15.56 15.60 15.58 15.34 16.47 15.62 O2 (oxygen)2.67 2.55 2.54 3.11 3.14 2.92 2.69 1.35 2.53 Md Molecular Weight Dry 30.59 30.60 30.60 30.61 30.62 30.61 30.56 30.69 30.60 #VALUE!#VALUE! Ms Molecular Weight Wet 28.61 28.62 28.62 28.84 28.85 28.84 28.79 28.90 28.83 #VALUE!#VALUE! N2 (nitrogen)81.83 81.86 81.86 81.34 81.26 81.50 81.97 82.18 81.85 #VALUE!#VALUE! Vm Sample Volume (cf)34.62 34.62 34.62 40.15 40.15 40.15 40.37 40.37 40.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vm std Standard Volume (dscf)29.01 29.01 29.01 33.46 33.46 33.46 33.83 33.83 33.83 Vlc Moisture (g)114.80 114.80 114.80 116.30 116.30 116.30 117.70 117.70 117.70 Vwstd Moisture Volume (scf)5.40 5.40 5.40 5.47 5.47 5.47 5.54 5.54 5.54 Bws Moisture Content (%100)15.70%15.70%15.70%14.06%14.06%14.06%14.07%14.07%14.07% S Bws (saturation moisture)30.76%29.35%30.23%27.86%29.20%28.99%28.42%26.43%26.10% AvgSqrtDlp √∆P 0.712 0.716 0.724 0.708 0.711 0.702 0.685 0.699 0.699 Vs. Gas Velocity (ft./sec)46.70 46.85 47.44 46.06 46.35 45.79 44.64 45.40 45.41 Qa (stack actual flow rate) acfm 24,453 24,532 24,841 24,118 24,270 23,977 23,374 23,772 23,778 Qs (stack std. flow rate) dscfm 15,247 15,344 15,507 15,432 15,481 15,301 14,934 15,262 15,277 #VALUE!#VALUE!#VALUE! Qsd (stack std. flow rate) dscfh 914,836 920,635 930,397 925,917 928,843 918,072 896,070 915,690 916,649 Qw (stack flow rate) wscfm 1,085,247 1,092,125 1,103,707 1,077,421 1,080,824 1,068,292 1,042,831 1,065,665 1,066,781 HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Test Overview NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification Holly Frontier Point Source FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 Contact Phone No.Matt Howes Stack Designation:FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 Project No.:0 Run Run # 1 Run # 2 Run # 3 Run # 4 Run # 5 Run # 6 Run # 7 Run # 8 Run # 9 Run # 10 Run # 11 Run # 12 Test Date 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 5/1/2024 Heat Input - BTU/hr. F factor - scf/MMBtu Fuel Analysis - ft3/min 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 1050.0 Fuel Flow - ft3/min 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Heat Input - BTU/hr. SO2 Concentrations Uncorrected 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 Dry Corrected -0.12 -0.22 -0.22 -0.62 -1.04 -1.04 -0.53 -0.35 -0.35 Wet Corrected NOx Concentrations Uncorrected 14.54 15.51 14.39 16.83 17.46 17.11 17.46 17.83 21.31 Dry Corrected 13.87 14.28 13.12 15.90 16.77 16.42 16.90 17.39 20.81 Wet Corrected CO Concentrations Uncorrected 73.04 64.84 78.00 72.54 72.67 74.22 98.29 151.20 67.11 Dry Corrected 74.22 65.85 79.20 73.76 73.98 75.56 100.05 153.93 68.41 Wet Corrected CO2 Concentrations Uncorrected 15.08 15.11 15.12 15.11 15.18 15.16 14.95 16.08 15.25 Dry Corrected 15.50 15.59 15.60 15.56 15.60 15.58 15.34 16.47 15.62 Wet Corrected O2 Concentrations Uncorrected 2.85 2.84 2.83 3.15 2.95 2.74 2.68 1.52 2.68 Dry Corrected 2.67 2.55 2.54 3.11 3.14 2.92 2.69 1.35 2.53 Wet Corrected HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Division of Air Quality NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification Holly Frontier FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 Average Emission Dry SO2 NOX CO lbs./MMBtu Average % concentration lbs./hr.CO2 O2 ppm or % 0.50 16.16 85.00 15.65 2.61 Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -1.928E-08 1.656E-06 5.397E-06 lbs./hr.-0.02 1.52 4.94 15.50 2.67 ppm or %-0.12 13.87 74.22 15.08 2.85 Run 2 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -3.689E-08 1.706E-06 4.788E-06 lbs./hr.-0.03 1.57 4.41 15.59 2.55 ppm or %-0.22 14.28 65.85 15.08 2.84 Raw Value Run 3 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -3.689E-08 1.567E-06 5.759E-06 lbs./hr.-0.03 1.46 5.36 15.60 2.54 ppm or %-0.22 13.12 79.20 15.12 2.83 Raw Value Run 4 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -1.030E-07 1.899E-06 5.363E-06 lbs./hr.-0.10 1.76 4.97 15.56 3.11 ppm or %-0.62 15.90 73.76 15.11 3.15 Raw Value Run 5 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -1.723E-07 2.004E-06 5.379E-06 lbs./hr.-0.16 1.8611 5.00 15.60 3.14 ppm or %-1.04 16.77 73.99 15.18 2.95 Raw Value Corrected For Cal. Drift Raw Value Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift O2 CO2 Clear lbs./MMBTU HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Division of Air Quality NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification Holly Frontier FCCU Wet Gas Scrubber Unit 4 O2 CO2 Clear lbs./MMBTU Run 6 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -1.723E-07 1.961E-06 5.494E-06 lbs./hr.-0.16 1.8008 5.04 15.58 2.92 ppm or %-1.04 16.42 75.56 15.16 2.74 Raw Value Run 7 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -8.875E-08 2.019E-06 7.275E-06 lbs./hr.-0.08 1.81 6.52 15.34 2.69 ppm or %-0.53 16.90 100.05 14.95 2.68 Raw Value Run 8 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -5.734E-08 2.077E-06 1.119E-05 lbs./hr.-0.05 1.90 10.25 16.47 1.35 ppm or %-0.35 17.39 153.93 16.08 1.52 Raw Value Run 9 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft -5.734E-08 2.486E-06 4.974E-06 lbs./hr.-0.05 2.28 4.56 15.62 2.53 ppm or %-0.35 20.81 68.41 15.25 2.68 Raw Value Run 10 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft lbs./hr. ppm or %Raw Value Run 11 Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Atomic Weight 64 46 28 lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d)) lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d) lbs./cu.ft lbs./hr. ppm or %Raw Value Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift Corrected For Cal. Drift HF Sinclair FCCU Unit 4 RATA RM 1, 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19 - RA (tested 5-1-2024) Calibration Error Test Test Date May 1, 2024 O2 CS - Cal. Span 24.00 Units % Cylinder No. Expiration Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified Concentration CDir or CS - Measured Concentration Difference ACE Eq. 7E-1 Analyzer Cal. Error Status Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal. Mid-level 10.99 10.81 0.18 0.75% Passed Cal. High-level 24.00 23.63 0.37 1.54% Passed Cal. % of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification 0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00% 40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.79% 100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00% Test Date May 1, 2024 CO2 CS - Cal. Span 23.70 Units % Cylinder No. Expiration Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified Concentration CDir or CS - Measured Concentration Difference ACE Eq. 7E-1 Analyzer Cal. Error Status Low-level 0.00 -0.05 0.05 0.211% Passed Cal. Mid-level 10.97 10.83 0.14 0.591% Passed Cal. High-level 23.70 23.69 0.01 0.042% Passed Cal. % of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification 0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00% 40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 46.29% 100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00% Test Date May 1, 2024 SO2 CS - Cal. Span 49.00 Units ppm Cylinder No. Expiration Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified Concentration CDir or CS - Measured Concentration Difference ACE Eq. 7E-1 Analyzer Cal. Error Status Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal. Mid-level 25.00 25.06 0.06 0.122% Passed Cal. High-level 49.00 48.92 0.08 0.163% Passed Cal. % of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification 0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00% 40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 51.02% 100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00% Test Date May 1, 2024 NOx CS - Cal. Span 50.10 Units ppm Cylinder No. Expiration Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified Concentration CDir or CS - Measured Concentration Difference ACE Eq. 7E-1 Analyzer Cal. Error Status Low-level 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.180% Passed Cal. Mid-level 25.00 25.03 0.03 0.060% Passed Cal. High-level 50.10 50.39 0.29 0.579% Passed Cal. % of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification 0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00% 40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.90% 100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00% Test Date May 1, 2024 CO CS - Cal. Span 390.00 500 Units ppm Cylinder No. Expiration Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified Concentration CDir or CS - Measured Concentration Difference ACE Eq. 7E-1 Analyzer Cal. Error Status Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.010% Passed Cal. Mid-level 200.00 193.95 6.05 1.551% Passed Cal. High-level 390.00 391.02 1.02 0.262% Passed Cal. % of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification 0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00% 40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 51.28% 100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%