Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DAQ-2024-011250
1 DAQC-1077-24 Site ID 10337 (B4) MEMORANDUM TO: STACK TEST FILE – UTAH METAL WORKS, INCORPORATED – Utah Metal Works THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager FROM: Paul Bushman, Environmental Scientist DATE: October 22, 2024 SUBJECT: Source: One (1) Chopping Line Baghouse Contact: Brenda Terry: 801-364-5679 Location: Remote location in Uintah County, UT Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group Permit/AO#: DAQE-AN103370009-24, dated March 27, 2024 Action Code: TR Subject: Review of stack test report received October 18, 2024 On October 18, 2024, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the Chopping Line Baghouse at Utah Metal Works, Salt Lake County, UT. Testing was performed September 23, 2024, through September 25, 2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in condition II.B.3.a of DAQE-AN103370009-24. The calculated test results are: Source Test Date Test Method Pollutant Tester Results DAQ Results Limits Chopping Line Baghouse September 23-25, 2024 201A PM10 0.00056 gr/dscf 0.00054gr/dscf 0.00133 gr/dscf 0.094 lb/hr 0.09048 lb/hr 0.24 lb/hr PM2.5 0.00036 gr/dscf 0.00036 gr/dscf 0.00065 gr/dscf 0.060 lb/hr 0.06057 lb/hr 0.12 lb/hr DEVIATIONS: None. CONCLUSION: The stack test report appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: The emissions from the above units appear to be in compliance with the limits in the Approval Order. ATTACHMENTS: DAQ stack test review excel spreadsheets, Utah Metal Works, Inc. stack test report. Utah Metal Works Incorporated Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake County Chopping Line Baghouse Test Date 9/23/2024-9/25/2024 Method 201A - PM10 Emissions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average date 9/23/2024 9/24/2024 9/25/2024 start time 12:21 PM 9:30 AM 9:15 AM stop time 16:33 PM 13:30 PM 13:20 PM sample volume (ft3)106.836 106.388 103.814 105.679 sampling time (minutes)243.20 245.00 240.50 242.90 stack temp. (oF)76.5 70.4 75.1 74 meter temp. (oF)74.6 69.8 67.4 71 barometric pressure (mbar)874 874 872 873 barometric pressure (" Hg)25.82 25.81 25.75 25.79 stack pressure (" H2O)-4.50 -4.50 -4.50 -4.50 moisture (grams)15.1 15.7 14.5 15.1 oxygen (%)21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 carbon dioxide (%)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 nitrogen (%)79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 orifice pressure delta H (" H2O)0.65 0.68 0.68 0.67 average √∆P 0.8100 0.8200 0.8200 0.817 meter box Yd 0.989 0.989 0.989 0.989 delta H@ 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 pitot tube constant 0.762 0.762 0.762 0.76 nozzle diameter (inches)0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 stack diameter (inches)39.8 39.8 39.8 39.75 Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average PM10, rinse (g)0.00130 0.00080 0.00140 0.00117 mass, filter (g)0.00190 0.00250 0.00150 0.00197 PM2.5 mass, cyclone rinse (g)0.00170 0.00200 0.00110 0.00160 PM2.5 mass, filter (g)0.00050 0.00050 0.00050 0.00050 Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average sample volume (dscf)90.217 90.626 88.629 89.824 moisture volume (scf)0.712 0.740 0.684 0.712 absolute stack press. (" Hg)25.49 25.48 25.42 25.46 moisture content (%/100)0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 molecular weight (dry)28.84 28.84 28.84 28.84 molecular weight (actual)28.76 28.75 28.76 28.75 gas velocity (ft/sec)45.1 45.4 45.7 45.4 gas flow (acfm)23,339 23,501 23,631 23,491 gas flow (dscfm)19,407 19,768 19,665 19,613 % isokinetic 95.3 93.4 93.5 94.0 nozzle area (ft2)1.728E-04 1.728E-04 1.728E-04 1.728E-04 Nozzle Velocity (ft/sec)43.0 42.4 42.7 42.7 R_min 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 V_min 29.6 29.1 29.3 29.3 R_max 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 V_max 54.7 53.9 54.3 54.3 Min Velocity Head (Delta P_min)0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 Max Velocity Head (Delta P_max)0.96 0.95 0.95 0.95 Gas Viscosity (micropoise)182.0 180.5 181.7 181.4 Dry std Cyclone Flow Rate (ft3/min)0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 Actual Cyclone Flow Rate (ft3/min)0.45 0.44 0.44 0.44 Actual PM10 Cyclone Cut size (μm)10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 Reynold's Number (unitless)2,892 2,908 2,878 2,893 Cunningham correction factor (unitless)1.078 1.077 1.078 1.078 Re-estimated Cunningham correction factor (unitless)1.071 1.070 1.071 1.070 Z Ratio (0.99<Z<1.01)1.004 1.004 1.004 1.004 Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Average Emission Limits Total PM10 emissions (lb/hr)0.09107 0.09523 0.08513 0.09048 0.24 Total PM10 emissions (gr/dscf)0.00055 0.00056 0.00050 0.00054 0.00133 Total PM25 emissions (lb/hr)0.06261 0.07215 0.04697 0.06057 0.12 Total PM25 emissions (gr/dscf)0.00038 0.00043 0.00028 0.00036 0.00065 Total PM emissions (lb/hr)0.15368 0.16738 0.13210 0.15105 Total PM emissions (gr/dscf)0.00092 0.00099 0.00078 0.00090 Reference Method Calculations Laboratory Data Field Reference Method Data Particulate Emissions Calculations Source Test Report Utah Metal Works Incorporated 805 Everett Ave Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Source Tested: One (1) Chopping Line Baghouse Test Dates: September 23 – 25, 2024 Project No. AST-2024-3762 Prepared By Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 Source Test Report Test Program Summary AST-2024-3762 UMW – Salt Lake City, UT Page i Regulatory Information Permit No. DAQE-AN103370009-24 Source Information Source Name Target Parameter One (1) Chopping Line Baghouse Contact Information Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory Utah Metal Works Incorporated 805 Everett Ave Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Facility Contact Brenda Terry brenda@umw.com (801) 364-5679 Alliance Technical Group, LLC 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120 Project Manager Charles Horton charles.horton@alliancetg.com (352) 663-7568 Field Team Leader Alan Jensen alan.jensen@alliancetg.com (847) 220-3949 QA/QC Manager Kathleen Shonk katie.shonk@alliancetg.com (812) 452-4785 Report Coordinator Delaine Spangler delaine.spangler@alliancetg.com Report Reviewer Sarah Perry sarah.perry@alliancetg.com Alliance Source Testing, LLC 5530 Marshall Street Arvada, CO 80002 Eric Grosjean eric.grosjean@alliancetg.com (303) 420-5949 2 of 52 Source Test Report Certification Statement AST-2024-3762 UMW – Salt Lake City, UT Page ii Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer. To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections in the test report. This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document. Charles Horton, QSTI Alliance Technical Group, LLC Date 10/18/2024 3 of 52 Source Test Report Table of Contents AST-2024-3762 UMW – Salt Lake City, UT Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Facility Descriptions ................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.4 Test Program Notes ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Summary of Results .................................................................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ........ 3-1 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ............................................................................ 3-1 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 201A –PM < 2.5 Microns ..................................................................... 3-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Table 2-1: Summary of Results ................................................................................................................................ 2-1 Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1 APPENDICES Appendix A Sample Calculations Appendix B Field Data Appendix C Laboratory Data Appendix D Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data Appendix E Process Operating/Control System Data 4 of 52 Introduction 5 of 52 Source Test Report Introduction AST-2024-3762 UMW – Salt Lake City, UT Page 1-1 1.0 Introduction Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Utah Metal Works Incorporated (UMW) to conduct compliance testing at the Salt Lake City, Utah facility. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Approval Order (AO) DAQE- AN103370009-24. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rates of particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) at the exhaust of one (1) Aluminum BH / Aluminum Line Chopping Line Baghouse. 1.1 Facility Descriptions UMW operates a scrap metal recycling plant in Salt Lake City, Utah. Particulate emissions from two chopping lines are controlled by fabric filters. The primary process is aluminum and copper wire recycling. The aluminum & copper wires and insulation are first chopped in 2 pre-shredders. The chopped wire is then conveyed to 1 granulator that further chops the wire and insulation into smaller sections. These smaller sections are then conveyed into a double deck screen. This vibrating screen separates the sections into a small size mesh and a large size mesh. The large mesh is conveyed to an air gravity separator and the small mesh is conveyed to another air gravity separator. From there, the different sizes of aluminum and copper are deposited into boxes for shipping. Any aluminum or copper that has not been fully liberated from the insulation is recirculated through the entire process again. Air pickup vents are located throughout the entire chopping process that transport the insulation to a cyclone and baghouse. 1.2 Project Team Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table. Table 1-1: Project Team UMW Personnel Brenda Terry Alliance Personnel Alan Jensen Michell Manwaring 1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by Alliance on July 30, 2024. 1.4 Test Program Notes Method 3/3A was not conducted during this testing, instead, the O2 and CO2 concentration were assumed to be ambient for molecular weight and volumetric flow rate calculations. 6 of 52 Summary of Results 7 of 52 Source Test Report Summary of Results AST-2024-3762 UMW – Salt Lake City, UT Page 2-1 2.0 Summary of Results Alliance conducted compliance testing at the UMW facility in Salt Lake City, Utah on September 23 – 25, 2024. Testing consisted of determining the emission rates of PM2.5 at the exhaust of one (1) Aluminum BH / Aluminum Line Chopping Line Baghouse. Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable permit limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation. Table 2-1: Summary of Results Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 9/23/24 9/24/24 9/25/24 -- Filterable PM2.5 Data Concentration, grain/dscf 0.00038 0.00043 0.00028 0.00036 Permit Limit, grain/dscf -- -- -- 0.00065 Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 55 Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.062 0.072 0.047 0.060 Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 0.12 Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 50 Filterable PM10 Data Concentration, grain/dscf 0.00060 0.00056 0.00052 0.00056 Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.099 0.095 0.088 0.094 Filterable PM Data Concentration, grain/dscf 0.00075 0.00099 0.00078 0.00084 Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.12 0.17 0.13 0.14 8 of 52 Testing Methodology 9 of 52 Source Test Report Testing Methodology AST-2024-3762 UMW – Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-1 3.0 Testing Methodology The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix D. Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology Parameter U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods Notes/Remarks Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis Particulate Matter less than 2.5 Microns 201A Constant Rate Sampling 3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 1. Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type thermocouple and pyrometer. The O2 and CO2 concentration were assumed to be ambient for molecular weight and volumetric flow rate calculations. Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2. 3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed. 3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 201A –PM < 2.5 Microns The PM2.5 testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 201A. The complete sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel nozzle, PM10 and PM2.5 in-stack cyclones, in-stack filter holder, pre- weighed quartz filter, heated glass-lined probe extension, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas conditioning train, pump and calibrated dry gas meter. The gas conditioning train consisted of a coiled condenser and four (4) chilled impingers. The first and second impingers contained 100 mL of de-ionized (DI) water, the third was initially empty and the last impinger contained 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter was placed between the second and third impingers. The probe liner heating system was maintained at a temperature of 248 ±25°F, and the impinger temperature was maintained at 68°F or less throughout testing. The temperature of the Teflon filter was maintained greater than 65°F but less than or equal to 85°F. 10 of 52 Source Test Report Testing Methodology AST-2024-3762 UMW – Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-2 Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train was leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. The nitrogen purge was omitted due to minimal condensate collected in the dry impingers. After the leak check the impinger contents were measured for moisture gain. The pre-weighed quartz filter was carefully removed and placed in container 1. The front half of the filter holder and back-half of the PM2.5 cyclone were rinsed six (6) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate matter, and these rinses were recovered in container 2. The back-half of the PM10 cyclone, front half of the PM2.5 cyclone and the connecting stainless-steel tubing were rinsed six (6) times with acetone, and these rinses were recovered in container 3. All containers were sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis. The contents of impingers 1 and 2 were recovered in container CPM Cont. #1. The back half of the filterable PM filter holder, probe extension, coil condenser, impingers 1 and 2 and all connecting glassware were rinsed with DIUF water and then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #1 while the solvent rinses were recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter was removed from the filter holder and placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder was rinsed with DIUF water and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse was added to container CPM Cont. #1 while the solvent rinses were added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers were sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis. 11 of 52 Appendix A 12 of 52 Appendix A Example Calculations Location: Source: Project No.: Run No./Method: Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg where, Pb 25.82 = barometric pressure, in. Hg ΔH 0.480 = pressure differential of orifice, in H2O Pm 25.86 = in. Hg Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg where, Pb 25.82 = barometric pressure, in. Hg Pg -4.50 = static pressure, in. H2O Ps 25.49 = in. Hg Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf where, Y 0.989 = meter correction factor Vm 106.836 = meter volume, cf Pm 25.86 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg Tm 534.3 = absolute meter temperature, oR Vmstd 90.181 = dscf Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf where, Vlc 15.1 = volume of H2O collected, ml Vwstd 0.712 = scf Moisture Fraction (BWSmsd), dimensionless (measured) where, Vwstd 0.712 = standard wet volume, scf Vmstd 90.181 = standard meter volume, dscf BWSmsd 0.008 Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions) where, Ts 76.5 = stack temperature, °F Ps 25.49 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg BWSsat 0.036 Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 Run 1/Method 201A 𝑉𝑚𝑠𝑡𝑑 ൌ 17.636 ൈ Y ൈ Vm ൈ Pm 𝑇𝑚 Vwstd ൌ 0.04716 ൈ Vlc Pm ൌ Pb Δ H 13 6 Ps ൌ Pb Pg 13 6 BWS ൌ Vwstd ሺVwstd Vmstdሻ BWSsat ൌ 10.ଷି ଶ,଼ଶୱାଷହ Ps 13 of 52 Appendix A Example Calculations Location: Source: Project No.: Run No./Method: Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 Run 1/Method 201A Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless where, BWSsat 0.036 = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions) BWSmsd 0.008 = moisture fraction (measured) BWS 0.008 Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole where, CO2 0.0 = carbon dioxide concentration, % O2 21.0 = oxygen concentration, % Md 28.84 = lb/lb mol Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole where, Md 28.84 = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol BWS 0.008 = moisture fraction, dimensionless Ms 28.76 = lb/lb mol Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec where, Cp 0.76 = pitot tube coefficient Δ P1/2 0.807 = velocity head of stack gas, (in. H2O)1/2 Ts 536.2 = absolute stack temperature, °R Ps 25.49 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg Ms 28.76 = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol Vs 44.9 = ft/sec Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm where, Vs 44.9 = stack gas velocity, ft/sec As 8.62 = cross-sectional area of stack, ft2 Qa 23,210 = acfm Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm where, Qa 23,210 = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm BWS 0.008 = moisture fraction, dimensionless Ps 25.49 = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg Ts 536.2 = absolute stack temperature, °R Qs 19,307 = dscfm Ms ൌ Md ሺ1 െ BWSሻ 18.015 ሺBWSሻ Qs ൌ 17.636 ൈ Qa ൈ ሺ1 െ BWSሻ ൈ Ps Ts Md ൌ ሺ0.44 ൈ % COଶሻ ሺ0.32 ൈ % O2ሻ ሺ0.28 ሺ100 െ % COଶ െ % O2ሻሻ Qa ൌ 60 ൈ Vs ൈ As Vs ൌ 85.49 ൈ Cp ൈ ሺΔ P ଵ/ଶሻ avg ൈ Ts Ps x Ms BWS ൌ BWSmsd unless BWSsat ൏ BWSmsd 14 of 52 Appendix A Example Calculations Location: Source: Project No.: Run No./Method: Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 Run 1/Method 201A Filterable PM2.5 Concentration (CFPM2.5), grain/dscf where, MFPM2.5 1.7 = FPM2.5 mass, mg Vmstd 90.181 = standard meter volume, dscf CFPM2.5 0.00038 = grain/dscf Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate (ERPM2.5), lb/hr where, CFPM2.5 0.0004 = FPM2.5 concentration, grain/dscf Qs 19,307 = average stack gas flow at standard conditions, dscfm ERFPM2.5 0.062 = lb/hr Cଶ.ହ ൌ 𝑀ிெଶ.ହ ൈ 0.0154 Vmstd ERଶ.ହ ൌ Cଶ.ହ ൈ Qs ൈ 60 7.0E 03 15 of 52 Appendix B 16 of 52 Emissions Data Location Source Project No. Parameter Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 9/23/24 9/24/24 9/25/24 - Start Time 12:21 9:30 9:15 - Stop Time 16:33 13:39 13:20 - Run Time, min (θ)243.2 245.0 240.5 242.9 Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 25.82 25.81 25.75 25.79 Meter Correction Factor (Y) 0.989 0.989 0.989 0.989 Orifice Calibration Value (Δ H@) 1.741 1.741 1.741 1.741 Meter Volume, ft3 (Vm) 106.836 106.388 103.814 105.679 Meter Temperature, °F (Tm) 74.6 69.8 67.4 70.6 Meter Temperature, °R (Tm) 534.3 529.5 527.1 530.3 Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (Δ H) 0.480 0.490 0.470 0.480 Volume H2O Collected, mL (Vlc) 15.1 15.7 14.5 15.1 Nozzle Diameter, in (Dn) 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 Area of Nozzle, ft2 (An) 0.00017 0.00017 0.00017 0.00017 Filterable <PM2.5 (Rinse) Mass, mg (MFPM2.5)1.7 2.0 1.1 1.6 Filterable <PM2.5 (Filter) Mass, mg (MFPM2.5)0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Filterable >PM2.5 & <PM10 Mass, mg (MFPM10)1.3 0.8 1.4 1.2 Filterable >PM10 Mass, mg (MFPM)0.9 2.5 1.5 1.6 Filterable PM2.5 Mass, mg (MFPM2.5)2.2 2.5 1.6 2.1 Filterable PM10 Mass, mg (MFPM10)3.5 3.3 3.0 3.3 Filterable PM Mass, mg (MFPM)4.4 5.8 4.5 4.9 Standard Meter Volume, ft3 (Vmstd) 90.181 90.576 88.579 89.779 Standard Water Volume, ft3 (Vwstd) 0.712 0.740 0.684 0.712 Sampling Rate, acfm (Qs) 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.44 Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.036 0.029 0.034 0.033 Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 Meter Pressure, in Hg (Pm) 25.86 25.85 25.78 25.829 Volume at Nozzle, ft3 (Vn) 108.411 107.722 106.477 107.537 Isokinetic Sampling Rate, % (+/- 20%) (I) 95.8 93.1 93.0 94.0 DGM Calibration Check Value, % (+/- 5%)(Yqa)1.6 -0.1 1.5 1.0 Particle Cut Diameter (PM2.5), um (+/-0.25 um)(D50IV)2.34 2.34 2.36 2.35 Reynolds Number (Nre) 2,822 2,837 2,808 2822 Cunningham Correction Factor ( C) 1.072 1.071 1.072 1.072 Gas Viscosity, mpoise (µ)186.47 184.98 186.14 185.86 Cunningham Correction Factor (Cr) 1.077 1.076 1.077 1.077 Particle Cut Diameter, um (D50-1)2.34 2.34 2.35 2.34 Ratio of D50 and D50-1 (+/- 0.01)(Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Filterable PM2.5 Concentration, grain/dscf (CFPM2.5)0.00038 0.00043 0.00028 0.00036 Filterable PM2.5 Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERFPM2.5)0.062 0.072 0.047 0.060 Filterable PM10 Concentration, grain/dscf (CFPM10)0.00060 0.00056 0.00052 0.00056 Filterable PM10 Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERFPM10)0.099 0.095 0.088 0.094 Filterable PM Concentration, grain/dscf (CFPM)0.00075 0.00099 0.00078 0.00084 Filterable PM Emission Rate, lb/hr (ERFPM)0.12 0.17 0.13 0.14 Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 EMISSION CALCULATIONS CALCULATED DATA INPUT DATA RECALCULATED DATA PM2.5 17 of 52 VFR Data Location Source Project No. Parameter Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 9/23/24 9/24/24 9/25/24 - Start Time 12:21 9:30 9:15 - Stop Time 16:33 13:39 13:20 - Run Time, min 243.2 245.0 240.5 242.9 Point 1 0.72 0.65 0.67 0.68 Point 2 0.75 0.69 0.74 0.73 Point 3 0.77 0.84 0.82 0.81 Point 4 0.66 0.77 0.71 0.71 Point 5 0.63 0.67 0.62 0.64 Point 6 0.56 0.53 0.51 0.53 Point 7 0.48 0.60 0.62 0.57 Point 8 0.63 0.71 0.77 0.70 Point 9 0.78 0.81 0.84 0.81 Point 10 0.70 0.75 0.74 0.73 Point 11 0.65 0.66 0.61 0.64 Point 12 0.52 0.50 0.56 0.53 Square Root of ΔP (in. WC)1/2 0.81 0.82 0.82 0.82 Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb) 25.8 25.8 25.8 25.8 Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg) -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 25.5 25.5 25.4 25.5 Stack Cross-sectional Area, ft2 (As) 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 Temperature, °F (Ts) 76.5 70.4 75.1 74.0 Temperature, °R (Ts) 536.2 530.1 534.8 533.7 Moisture Fraction Measured (BWSmsd) 0.0078 0.0081 0.0077 0.0079 Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat) 0.036 0.029 0.034 0.033 Moisture Fraction (BWS) 0.0078 0.0081 0.0077 0.0079 O2 Concentration, % (O2) 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 CO2 Concentration, % (CO2) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8 Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms) 28.8 28.8 28.8 28.8 Velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 44.9 45.6 45.9 45.5 At Stack Conditions, acfm (Qa) 23,210 23,560 23,736 23,502 At Standard Conditions, dscfm (Qs) 19,307 19,810 19,746 19,621 Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE CALCULATED DATA VELOCITY HEAD, in. WC PM2.5 18 of 52 Method 1 Data Location Source Project No. Date Vertical Circular 45.75 in 6.00 in 39.75 in 8.62 ft2 2 1 23.8 ft 7.2 (must be > 0.5) 6.3 ft 1.9 (must be > 2) 12 12 Measurer (Initial and Date):MDM 9/23/24 Reviewer (Initial and Date):AJE 9/23/24 2345 6 789101112 1 14.6 -- 6.7 --4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 4.4 1.75 7.75 2 85.4 -- 25.0 --14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 14.6 5.80 11.80 3 -- -- 75.0 --29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 29.6 11.77 17.77 4 -- -- 93.3 --70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 70.4 27.98 33.98 5 -- -- -- --85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 85.4 33.95 39.95 6 -- -- -- --95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 95.6 38.00 44.00 7 -- -- -- ------ 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- ------ 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 -- -- -- 9 -- -- -- ------ -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- ------ -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 -- -- -- 11 -- -- -- ------ -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 -- -- -- 12 -- -- -- ------ -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 -- -- -- *Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point. A = 23.8 ft. B = 6.3 ft. Depth of Duct = 39.75 in. Number of traverse points on a diameter Stack Diagram Cross Sectional Area LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS Traverse Point % of Diameter Distance from inside wall Distance from outside of port No. of Test Ports: Number of Readings per Point: Distance A: Distance A Duct Diameters: Distance B: Distance B Duct Diameters: Minimum Number of Traverse Points: Actual Number of Traverse Points: CIRCULAR DUCT Cross Sectional Area of Duct: Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 09/23/24 Stack Parameters Duct Orientation: Duct Design: Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port: Nipple Length: Depth of Duct: Upstream Disturbance Downstream Disturbance B A 19 of 52 Cyclonic Flow Check Location Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Source Chopping Line Baghouse Project No. AST-2024-3762 Date 9/23/24 Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0) 1 8 2 12 3 16 4 10 5 11 6 13 7 10 8 9 9 8 10 15 11 9 12 15 Average 11 20 of 52 Method 4 Data Location Source Project No. Parameter: Run 1 Date:9/23/24 Impinger No.1234Total Contents water water empty silica -- Initial Mass, g 684.3 698.0 647.3 943.9 2973.5 Final Mass, g 676.9 700.6 646.8 964.3 2988.6 Gain, g -7.4 2.6 -0.5 20.4 15.1 Run 2 Date:9/24/24 Impinger No.1234Total Contents water water empty silica -- Initial Mass, g 676.9 700.6 646.8 964.3 2988.6 Final Mass, g 674.4 700.4 646.9 982.6 3004.3 Gain, g -2.5 -0.2 0.1 18.3 15.7 Run 3 Date:9/25/24 Impinger No.1234Total Contents water water empty silica -- Initial Mass, g 674.4 700.4 646.9 982.6 3004.3 Final Mass, g 671.1 700.8 648.0 998.9 3018.8 Gain, g -3.3 0.4 1.1 16.3 14.5 Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 PM2.5 21 of 52 Field Data Location: Start Time: Source: Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 1.0 % est.Ts (°F):75 Tm (°F):70 Ts-50°25 Ts+50°125 Mid 1 (cf): 25.82 in. Hg Est. Qs:0.438 cfm Est. Qs:0.398 Est. Qs:0.479 Mid 2 (cf): -4.5 in. WC Est. µs:185.89 mpoise Est. µs:173.90 Est. µs:197.92 Mid 3 (cf): 25.49 in. Hg PR-704-1 glass Est. ΔH:0.477 in. WC Est. ΔH:0.479 Est. ΔH:0.477 Total (cf): 0.0 %P-1167 P-1167 FILTER NO. 21.0 %s-type s-type Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Post 9419-C Pb: 25.82 in. Hg 79.0 %0.761 0.761 0.001 -- -- 0.002 Pg: -4.5 in. WC 28.84 lb/lb-mole 4 0.178 15 -- -- 10 O2: 21.0 % 28.73 lb/lb-mole 12 240 PASS -- -- PASS CO2: 0.0 % Stack Probe Filter Imp. Exit CPM Filter Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. 70 Ideal Actual 70 -- 70 -- A1 21:19 0:21:19 0.72 78 0.47 0.48 3 79 -- 68 -- 0.45 91.5 10.55 2.33 2 21:45 0:43:04 0.75 77 0.48 0.48 3 80 -- 66 -- 0.46 92.0 10.34 2.26 3 22:03 1:05:07 0.77 75 0.48 0.48 3 80 -- 58 -- 0.46 90.8 10.33 2.25 4 20:24 1:25:31 0.66 76 0.48 0.48 3 79 -- 53 -- 0.45 96.3 10.47 2.30 5 19:56 1:45:27 0.63 78 0.48 0.48 3 79 -- 52 -- 0.46 100.6 10.34 2.26 6 18:48 2:04:15 0.56 76 0.48 0.48 3 79 -- 53 -- 0.45 104.8 10.45 2.30 B1 17:24 2:21:39 0.48 73 0.49 0.48 3 79 -- 54 -- 0.44 109.7 10.67 2.37 2 19:56 2:41:36 0.63 73 0.49 0.48 3 79 -- 55 -- 0.43 94.1 10.80 2.42 3 22:11 3:03:47 0.78 75 0.48 0.48 3 79 -- 57 -- 0.44 86.4 10.65 2.37 4 21:01 3:24:48 0.70 78 0.48 0.48 3 79 -- 59 -- 0.46 94.4 10.41 2.28 5 20:15 3:45:03 0.65 79 0.48 0.48 3 79 -- 60 -- 0.43 92.8 10.83 2.44 6 18:07 4:03:10 0.52 80 0.47 0.48 3 79 -- 58 -- 0.43 102.9 10.90 2.47 Max D50 Vac.2.5 um 243.2 min 106.836 ft3 0.65 in. WC 74.6 °F 76.5 °F 3 0.480 in. WC 95.8 2.34 1.6 Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 PM2.5 Y: 76 74 32.960 104.860 86.755 52.725 42.760 61.800 70.825 79.217 Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Run 19/23/24 STACK DATA (EST)EQUIPMENT STACK DATA (EST) Gas Temps (°F) Pitot Tube: YqaΔH 75 75 76 75 75 75 75 76 Ts 12:21 16:33 Leak Rate (cfm): 114.275 Sa m p l e P o i n t 130.504 Moisture: Barometric: Static Press: Stack Press: CO2: O2: N2/CO: Md: Ms: Total Time Pump Vac (in Hg): Gas Temperatures (°F)Orifice Press. ΔH (in. WC)D50 [2.5 um] 70 Amb.Qs (acfm) D50 [10 um] Pump Vac (in. Hg) Nozzle ID/Dn (in.): % ISO DGM Average Pitot Tube ΔP (in. WC) VOLUME CORRECTION STACK DATA (FINAL) M5-2600 LEAK CHECKS METER BOX: ΔH@ (in. WC): 0.989 1.741 Pitot Type Cp/Cp': Probe ID/Material: Parameter: +/- 50°F ΔH 10 um D50Vm Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 23.668 Tm 73 95.235 122.880 Final DGM: 10.58 No. Pts/Time (min): Pitot ID Cp/Cp': Pitot Cp/Cp': % ISOΔP 70 Actual Run Time Dwell Time 22 of 52 Field Data Location: Start Time: Source: Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 1.0 % est.Ts (°F):77 Tm (°F):75 Ts-50°27 Ts+50°127 Mid 1 (cf): 25.82 in. Hg Est. Qs:0.439 cfm Est. Qs:0.399 Est. Qs:0.480 Mid 2 (cf): -4.50 in. WC Est. µs:186.25 mpoise Est. µs:174.26 Est. µs:198.28 Mid 3 (cf): 25.49 in. Hg PR-701-1 glass Est. ΔH:0.481 in. WC Est. ΔH:0.479 Est. ΔH:0.477 Total (cf): 0.0 %P-1167 P-1167 FILTER NO. 21.0 %s-type s-type Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Post 9429-C Pb: 25.81 in. Hg 79.0 %0.761 0.761 0.002 -- -- 0.002 Pg: -4.5 in. WC 28.84 lb/lb-mole 4 0.178 15 -- -- 10 O2: 21.0 % 28.73 lb/lb-mole 12 240 PASS -- -- PASS CO2: 0.0 % Stack Probe Filter Imp. Exit CPM Filter Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- -- A1 19:59 0:19:59 0.65 64 0.49 0.49 3 70 -- 64 -- 0.44 96.8 10.41 2.26 2 20:36 0:40:35 0.69 63 0.50 0.49 3 73 -- 46 -- 0.44 93.9 10.40 2.26 3 22:43 1:03:18 0.84 67 0.49 0.49 3 75 -- 46 -- 0.43 82.4 10.68 2.37 4 21:45 1:25:04 0.77 66 0.49 0.49 3 75 -- 46 -- 0.44 88.1 10.49 2.30 5 20:18 1:45:21 0.67 68 0.49 0.49 3 75 -- 48 -- 0.43 91.8 10.72 2.38 6 18:03 2:03:24 0.53 70 0.49 0.49 3 76 -- 49 -- 0.43 102.3 10.80 2.42 B1 19:12 2:22:37 0.60 71 0.49 0.49 3 76 -- 50 -- 0.44 98.8 10.60 2.34 2 20:53 2:43:30 0.71 73 0.49 0.49 3 75 -- 54 -- 0.44 91.7 10.55 2.33 3 22:19 3:05:49 0.81 74 0.49 0.49 3 76 -- 52 -- 0.44 85.5 10.58 2.34 4 21:28 3:27:17 0.75 76 0.48 0.49 3 77 -- 53 -- 0.45 89.4 10.55 2.33 5 20:09 3:47:26 0.66 76 0.48 0.49 3 77 -- 55 -- 0.44 94.8 10.59 2.34 6 17:32 4:04:57 0.50 77 0.48 0.49 3 78 -- 57 -- 0.45 110.0 10.52 2.32 Max D50 Vac.2.5 um 245.0 min 106.388 ft3 0.68 in. WC 69.8 °F 70.4 °F 3 0.490 in. WC 93.1 2.34 -0.1 Actual Run Time Final DGM: Moisture: Barometric: Static Press: Stack Press: CO2: O2: N2/CO: Md: Ms: Sa m p l e P o i n t Dwell Time 9/24/24 9:30Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Run 2 13:39 STACK DATA (EST)VOLUME CORRECTION 68 Y: ΔH@ (in. WC): 0.989 1.741 Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 PM2.5Parameter: +/- 50°F ΔHSTACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT 66 Total Time M5-2600METER BOX: 76 70 75 66 193.215 212.115 221.545 168.745 177.325 140.500 230.360 Probe ID/Material: 202.355 184.904 Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) Nozzle ID/Dn (in.): 131.724 159.265 149.585 74 66 238.112 10 um D50Vm Pump Vac (in Hg): Pitot Tube: D50 [2.5 um] D50 [10 um] Orifice Press. ΔH (in. WC) Gas Temps (°F) Qs (acfm) Pump Vac (in. Hg) 10.60 67 Pitot Cp/Cp': STACK DATA (FINAL) Pitot Tube ΔP (in. WC) No. Pts/Time (min): Leak Rate (cfm): LEAK CHECKS Gas Temperatures (°F) 64 -- DGM Average Amb. Pitot ID Cp/Cp': Pitot Type Cp/Cp': % ISO YqaΔH% ISOTsΔPTm 74 72 23 of 52 Field Data Location: Start Time: Source: Date: VALID End Time: Project No.: 1.0 % est.Ts (°F):70 Tm (°F):70 Ts-50°20 Ts+50°120 Mid 1 (cf): 25.81 in. Hg Est. Qs:0.434 cfm Est. Qs:0.395 Est. Qs:0.475 Mid 2 (cf): -4.50 in. WC Est. µs:184.79 mpoise Est. µs:172.81 Est. µs:196.82 Mid 3 (cf): 25.48 in. Hg PR-701-1 glass Est. ΔH:0.477 in. WC Est. ΔH:0.480 Est. ΔH:0.476 Total (cf): 0.0 %P-1167 P-1167 FILTER NO. 21.0 %s-type s-type Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Post 9382-C Pb: 25.75 in. Hg 79.0 %0.761 0.761 0.002 -- -- 0.003 Pg: -4.5 in. WC 28.84 lb/lb-mole 4 0.178 15 -- -- 10 O2: 21.0 % 28.73 lb/lb-mole 12 240 PASS -- -- PASS CO2: 0.0 % Stack Probe Filter Imp. Exit CPM Filter Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb. -- Ideal Actual -- -- -- -- A1 19:53 0:19:53 0.67 69 0.47 0.47 3 71 -- 67 -- 0.44 94.6 10.50 2.30 2 20:54 0:40:47 0.74 68 0.47 0.47 3 72 -- 56 -- 0.43 87.9 10.67 2.36 3 22:00 1:02:47 0.82 70 0.47 0.47 3 74 -- 57 -- 0.44 84.3 10.61 2.35 4 20:28 1:23:15 0.71 71 0.47 0.47 3 75 -- 57 -- 0.44 91.8 10.52 2.31 5 19:08 1:42:22 0.62 73 0.47 0.47 3 75 -- 58 -- 0.44 97.7 10.57 2.34 6 17:21 1:59:43 0.51 74 0.47 0.47 3 76 -- 59 -- 0.43 104.6 10.80 2.42 B1 19:08 2:18:51 0.62 76 0.47 0.47 3 77 -- 59 -- 0.45 99.3 10.47 2.30 2 21:19 2:40:10 0.77 77 0.46 0.47 3 77 -- 61 -- 0.45 89.0 10.49 2.31 3 22:16 3:02:25 0.84 78 0.46 0.47 3 79 -- 58 -- 0.45 85.2 10.50 2.31 4 20:54 3:23:19 0.74 80 0.46 0.47 3 81 -- 55 -- 0.46 91.5 10.46 2.30 5 18:58 3:42:17 0.61 82 0.46 0.47 3 83 -- 54 -- 0.45 99.7 10.55 2.34 6 18:11 4:00:28 0.56 83 0.46 0.47 3 83 -- 55 -- 0.43 98.8 10.94 2.49 Max D50 Vac.2.5 um 240.5 min 103.814 ft3 0.68 in. WC 67.4 °F 75.1 °F 3 0.470 in. WC 93.0 2.36 1.5 Dwell Time 9/25/24 9:15Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Run 3 13:20 STACK DATA (EST) Moisture: Barometric: Static Press: VOLUME CORRECTION Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 PM2.5 STACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT 307.565 289.826 Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 247.275 334.925 238.702 265.485 256.105 Vm M5-2600METER BOX: Nozzle ID/Dn (in.): Pitot Cp/Cp': 68 Stack Press: CO2: O2: N2/CO: Md: Ms: Sa m p l e P o i n t 73 62 298.215 317.355 326.610 274.340 282.570 63 Total Time YqaΔH% ISOTsΔPTm 342.516Final DGM: Actual Run Time Pump Vac (in Hg): Pitot Tube: D50 [2.5 um] D50 [10 um] Orifice Press. ΔH (in. WC) Gas Temps (°F) Qs (acfm) Pump Vac (in. Hg) STACK DATA (FINAL) Pitot Tube ΔP (in. WC) No. Pts/Time (min): Leak Rate (cfm): LEAK CHECKS Gas Temperatures (°F) -- DGM Average Amb. % ISO Parameter: +/- 50°F ΔH 10 um D50 10.62 0.989 1.741 Y: ΔH@ (in. WC): Probe ID/Material: Pitot ID Cp/Cp': Pitot Type Cp/Cp': 61 66 71 69 65 72 64 75 24 of 52 Appendix C 25 of 52 Version No. LT 2020-00_20.0 Project No. AST-2024-3762 Alliance Technical Group, LLC Analytical Services 5530 Marshall St. Arvada, CO 80002 (720) 457-9504 www.alliancetg.com Analytical Laboratory Report Utah Metal Works, Inc. 805 Everett Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84116 26 of 52 Laboratory Analyst II Date Certification Statement Alliance Source Testing, LLC (AST) has completed the analysis as described in this report. Results apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and AST is not responsible for use of less than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without written approval from the customer. To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the relevant sections on the test report. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document. Validation Signature The analytical data and all QC contained within this report was reviewed and validated by the following individual. Rebecca Pope 2 of 21 Digitally signed by Rebecca PopeDN: OU=Alliance Technical Group, O=Alliance Analytical Services, CN=Rebecca Pope, E=rebecca.pope@allianceTG.comReason: I have reviewed this documentLocation: Date: 2024.10.07 10:23:06-05'00'Foxit PDF Editor Version: 12.1.4 27 of 52 Project Narrative Analytical Method(s):Method 201A - Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions from stationary Sources Filterable The filter(s) were either oven dried and/or desiccated per the method until a final weight was obtained. The liquid fractions were extracted if required, evaporated and cooled until a final weight was obtained. These fractions were summed together to provide the total Particulate Matter collected. MDL The Minimum Detection Level (MDL)is 0.5 mg per fraction.If the measured result for a fraction is less than the MDL, the MDL was used in ensuing calculations. Blank Correction If blank correction is performed,only blank values returned higher than the MDL are used. If a blank returns a value less than the MDL, no correction is included. Method 202 Recovery Blank corrections are applied by fraction (inorganic subtracted from inorganic; organic subtracted from organic). Custody:The samples were received by Dmitry Usav on 9/30/24 at 12:30 in Arvada, CO. The samples were received in good condition with proper Chain-of-Custody documentation. No apparent container problems were noted upon receipt. Prior to analysis, the samples were kept secure with access limited to authorized personnel of AST. Number of Samples:13 Labeling: Acceptable Analyst:Eric Grosjean - Technical Director Cory Manshack-Assistant Laboratory Manager Ryan Gillett-Laboratory Analyst II Carson Williamson-Laboratory Analyst I Dmitry Usav-Laboratory Analyst II Equipment:Mettler Toledo Balance ML-104, SN B217893065. This scale was used for analytical determinations of filters and rinse vessels. Denver Instruments Balance TB-6201, SN 17904189. This scale was used to measure the total mass of rinse collected for blank correction. Analysis was performed on the same balance as the associated tare. Quincy Lab Inc oven, 30CG, SN G3-012673. QC Notes:The samples met the minimum criteria established by the relevant method. Reporting Notes: 3 of 21 28 of 52 Client City, State Project No. Method Lab ID Field ID Filter ID 9419 Foil -C 9429 Foil -C 9382 Foil -C Filter tare, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 10/1/24 10/2/24 10/1/24 10/2/24 10/1/24 10/2/24 Time of Weighing 14:22 7:08 14:22 7:08 14:22 7:08 Filter Weight, g 1.0492 1.0491 0.9697 0.9701 1.0615 1.0611 Filter PM Mass, mg* Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Acetone, g Acetone Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/3/24 10/4/24 10/2/24 10/3/24 Time of Weighing 11:48 7:01 7:01 12:55 11:48 7:01 Weight, g 4.1272 4.1270 4.1267 4.1268 4.1348 4.1349 >PM10 Mass, mg* Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Acetone, g Acetone Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/2/24 10/3/24 Time of Weighing 11:48 7:01 11:48 7:01 11:48 7:01 Weight, g 4.1207 4.1204 4.1276 4.1274 4.1700 4.1701 PM10 Mass, mg* Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Acetone, g Acetone Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/2/24 10/3/24 10/2/24 10/3/24 Time of Weighing 11:48 7:01 11:48 7:01 11:48 7:01 Weight, g 4.1190 4.1192 4.1441 4.1437 4.1175 4.1174 PM2.5 Mass, mg* Blank Corrected *The total results have been calculated based on MDL values for any sample fractions which were below the MDL. 23.8 21.9 26.2 4.1687 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 3 Cont. 3 33622 33615 33630 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 2 Cont. 3 <=PM 10 Rinse 4.1420 4.1163 33634 33632 33639 4.1174 <PM 2.5 Rinse D48200 D48204 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 1 Cont. 4 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 2 Cont. 4 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 3 Cont. 4 D48208 11:36 24.3 20.5 26.7 16.4 22.6 10/1/24 19.7 22.0 11:36 11:36 10/1/24 10/1/24 28.4 No 11:36 11:36 10/1/24 10/1/24 1.7 2.0 1.1 10/1/24 10/1/24 10/1/24 11:36 D48199 D48203 4.1193 4.1267 17.8 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 1 Cont. 3 Utah Metal Works, Inc. Salt Lake City, UT 84116 AST-2024-3762 EPA Method 201A 9/30/24 9/30/24 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 2 Cont. 1 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 3 Cont. 1 1.0487 0.9699 1.0611 9/30/24 Front Half Filter D48197 D48201 D48205 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 1 Cont. 1 >PM10 Rinse D48198 D48202 D48206 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 1 Cont. 2 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 2 Cont. 2 M201A-Chopping Line Baghouse-Run 3 Cont. 2 25.6 31.9 34.1 21.5 27.8 11:36 33606 33604 11:36 38.2 11:36 1.3 0.8 1.4 D48207 13:15 13:15 13:15 0.5 0.5 0.5 10/1/24 1.50.9 2.5 33608 4.1262 4.1242 4.1334 4 of 21 29 of 52 Client City, State Project No. Method Lab ID Field ID Beaker ID Beaker tare, g Beaker Acetone, g Acetone Mass, g Date - Desiccator Time - Desiccator Date of Weighing 10/3/24 10/4/24 Time of Weighing 14:27 7:17 Weight, g 4.1379 4.1376 Solvent Blank Mass, mg* 11:36 45.8 10/1/24 49.9 0.00 D48209 M201A Acetone Blank 33605 4.1375 Acetone Blank Utah Metal Works, Inc. EPA Method 201A AST-2024-3762 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 5 of 21 30 of 52 6 of 21 31 of 52 7 of 21 32 of 52 8 of 21 33 of 52 9 of 21 34 of 52 10 of 21 35 of 52 11 of 21 36 of 52 12 of 21 37 of 52 13 of 21 38 of 52 14 of 21 39 of 52 15 of 21 40 of 52 16 of 21 41 of 52 17 of 21 42 of 52 18 of 21 43 of 52 19 of 21 44 of 52 9381 -C 0.1558 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1556 4/15/22 15:08 JY 0.1559 5/9/22 16:47 JY Pass 1.0547 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0546 5/9/22 16:48 JY 1.0547 5/11/22 15:34 JY Pass9382 -C 0.1558 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1558 4/15/22 13:24 JY 0.1557 5/9/22 15:41 JY Pass1.0611 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0610 4/15/22 13:25 JY 1.0612 5/9/22 15:42 JY Pass9383 -C 0.1555 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1554 4/15/22 15:06 JY 0.1556 5/9/22 16:14 JY Pass1.0314 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0312 4/15/22 15:07 JY 1.0315 5/9/22 16:14 JY Pass9384 -C 0.1564 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1562 4/15/22 15:19 JY 0.1565 5/9/22 16:42 JY Pass1.0408 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0406 4/15/22 15:19 JY 1.0410 5/9/22 16:43 JY Pass 9385 -C 0.1569 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1568 4/15/22 15:10 JY 0.1569 5/9/22 16:48 JY Pass 0.9666 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9664 4/15/22 15:11 JY 0.9668 5/9/22 16:49 JY Pass 9386 -C 0.1596 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1595 4/15/22 15:20 JY 0.1597 5/9/22 16:40 JY Pass1.1217 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1215 4/15/22 15:21 JY 1.1219 5/9/22 16:40 JY Pass9387 -C 0.1573 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1572 4/15/22 12:55 JY 0.1573 5/9/22 15:05 JY Pass1.1104 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1102 5/9/22 15:12 JY 1.1105 5/11/22 15:30 JY Pass9388 -C 0.1573 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1571 4/15/22 14:57 JY 0.1574 5/9/22 16:34 JY Pass0.9205 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9203 4/15/22 14:58 JY 0.9206 5/9/22 16:34 JY Pass 9389 -C 0.1560 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1558 4/15/22 14:56 JY 0.1561 5/9/22 16:23 JY Pass 1.0330 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0328 4/15/22 14:56 JY 1.0332 5/9/22 16:23 JY Pass9390 -C 0.1573 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1573 4/15/22 14:20 JY 0.1573 5/9/22 16:20 JY Pass1.0627 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0627 4/15/22 14:22 JY 1.0626 5/9/22 16:21 JY Pass9391 -C 0.1535 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1534 4/15/22 13:22 JY 0.1536 5/9/22 15:31 JY Pass1.0737 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0736 4/15/22 13:23 JY 1.0737 5/9/22 15:32 JY Pass9392 -C 0.1559 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1557 4/15/22 14:16 JY 0.1560 5/9/22 15:48 JY Pass 1.0286 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0284 4/15/22 14:17 JY 1.0288 5/9/22 15:48 JY Pass 9393 -C 0.1586 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1584 4/15/22 14:31 JY 0.1587 5/9/22 15:58 JY Pass1.0174 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0172 4/15/22 14:32 JY 1.0176 5/9/22 15:59 JY Pass9394 -C 0.1540 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1539 4/15/22 13:20 JY 0.1541 5/9/22 15:44 JY Pass0.9766 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9765 5/9/22 15:45 JY 0.9767 5/11/22 15:33 JY Pass9395 -C 0.1571 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1569 4/15/22 15:12 JY 0.1572 5/9/22 16:45 JY Pass1.0157 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0155 4/15/22 15:13 JY 1.0159 5/9/22 16:46 JY Pass 9396 -C 0.1558 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1556 4/15/22 13:12 JY 0.1559 5/9/22 16:07 JY Pass 0.9963 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9962 5/9/22 16:08 JY 0.9963 5/11/22 15:38 JY Pass 9397 -C 0.1562 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1562 4/15/22 14:22 JY 0.1561 5/9/22 16:24 JY Pass0.9444 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9444 4/15/22 14:24 JY 0.9444 5/9/22 16:24 JY Pass9398 -C 0.1551 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1549 4/15/22 12:48 JY 0.1553 5/9/22 15:50 JY Pass1.0240 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0239 5/9/22 15:51 JY 1.0241 5/11/22 15:30 JY Pass9399 -C 0.1576 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1575 4/15/22 12:51 JY 0.1577 5/9/22 15:37 JY Pass0.9266 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9267 5/9/22 15:38 JY 0.9265 5/11/22 15:33 JY Pass 9400 -C 0.1553 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1552 4/15/22 14:40 JY 0.1554 5/9/22 16:06 JY Pass 1.0608 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0608 4/15/22 14:43 JY 1.0608 5/9/22 16:07 JY Pass9401 -C 0.1546 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1546 4/15/22 14:18 JY 0.1546 5/9/22 15:46 JY Pass0.8212 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8212 4/15/22 14:20 JY 0.8212 5/9/22 15:47 JY Pass9402 -C 0.1545 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1545 4/15/22 15:22 JY 0.1545 5/9/22 16:38 JY Pass0.8560 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8558 4/15/22 15:23 JY 0.8561 5/9/22 16:39 JY Pass9403 -C 0.1545 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1543 4/15/22 14:58 JY 0.1547 5/9/22 16:36 JY Pass1.0229 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0227 4/15/22 15:00 JY 1.0231 5/9/22 16:37 JY Pass 9404 -C 0.1566 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1565 4/15/22 12:54 JY 0.1567 5/9/22 15:23 JY Pass0.9910 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9908 4/15/22 12:54 JY 0.9912 5/9/22 15:24 JY Pass9405 -C 0.1551 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1552 4/15/22 15:00 JY 0.1549 5/11/22 15:36 JY Pass1.0619 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0619 5/9/22 16:18 JY 1.0619 5/11/22 15:36 JY Pass9406 -C 0.1571 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1569 4/15/22 14:52 JY 0.1572 5/9/22 16:30 JY Pass1.1146 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1144 4/15/22 14:53 JY 1.1147 5/9/22 16:31 JY Pass9407 -C 0.1557 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1555 4/15/22 13:10 JY 0.1558 5/9/22 15:17 JY Pass 1.0762 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0761 5/9/22 15:21 JY 1.0763 5/11/22 15:29 JY Pass9408 -C 0.1556 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1554 4/15/22 14:12 JY 0.1557 5/9/22 15:49 JY Pass1.0499 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0497 4/15/22 14:13 JY 1.0501 5/9/22 15:49 JY Pass9409 -C 0.1540 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1538 4/15/22 12:40 JY 0.1542 5/9/22 15:33 JY Pass1.0397 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0396 4/15/22 12:39 JY 1.0397 5/9/22 15:33 JY Pass9410 -C 0.1547 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1546 4/15/22 14:38 JY 0.1547 5/9/22 16:04 JY Pass1.0848 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0849 5/9/22 16:05 JY 1.0847 5/11/22 15:32 JY Pass 9411 -C 0.1563 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1561 4/15/22 13:02 JY 0.1565 5/9/22 15:24 JY Pass 0.9756 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9754 4/15/22 13:03 JY 0.9758 5/9/22 15:25 JY Pass 9412 -C 0.1574 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1574 4/15/22 14:43 JY 0.1574 5/9/22 16:01 JY Pass1.0262 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0262 4/15/22 14:44 JY 1.0262 5/9/22 16:02 JY Pass9413 -C 0.1534 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1532 4/15/22 13:29 JY 0.1535 5/9/22 16:11 JY Pass0.9703 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9701 4/15/22 13:30 JY 0.9705 5/9/22 16:12 JY Pass9414 -C 0.1550 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1548 4/15/22 14:46 JY 0.1551 5/9/22 16:25 JY Pass1.0755 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0754 4/15/22 14:48 JY 1.0756 5/9/22 16:25 JY Pass 9415 -C 0.1563 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1562 4/15/22 13:05 JY 0.1564 5/9/22 15:26 JY Pass 1.0617 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0615 4/15/22 13:08 JY 1.0619 5/9/22 15:26 JY Pass9416 -C 0.1538 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1539 5/9/22 16:10 JY 0.1537 5/11/22 15:37 JY Pass1.0180 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0180 5/9/22 16:11 JY 1.0180 5/11/22 15:38 JY Pass9417 -C 0.1534 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1534 4/15/22 13:00 JY 0.1533 5/9/22 15:38 JY Pass1.0847 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0845 4/15/22 13:01 JY 1.0849 5/9/22 15:39 JY Pass9418 -C 0.1544 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1542 4/15/22 15:04 JY 0.1545 5/9/22 16:15 JY Pass 1.0825 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0824 5/9/22 16:18 JY 1.0825 5/11/22 15:37 JY Pass 9419 -C 0.1533 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1532 4/15/22 14:14 JY 0.1533 5/9/22 15:52 JY Pass1.0487 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0485 4/15/22 14:16 JY 1.0488 5/9/22 15:52 JY Pass9420 -C 0.1567 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1565 4/15/22 15:14 JY 0.1568 5/9/22 16:44 JY Pass1.0956 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0956 5/9/22 16:45 JY 1.0956 5/11/22 15:34 JY Pass9421 -C 0.1541 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1542 5/9/22 16:03 JY 0.1540 5/11/22 15:40 JY Pass1.0229 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0228 5/9/22 16:04 JY 1.0229 5/11/22 15:40 JY Pass 9422 -C 0.1568 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1566 4/15/22 14:52 JY 0.1570 5/9/22 15:05 JY Pass 1.0977 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0976 5/9/22 15:14 JY 1.0978 5/11/22 15:29 JY Pass 9423 -C 0.1553 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1553 4/15/22 12:57 JY 0.1553 5/9/22 15:14 JY Pass1.1093 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1091 4/15/22 12:58 JY 1.1095 5/9/22 15:15 JY Pass9424 -C 0.1560 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1559 4/15/22 15:16 JY 0.1561 5/9/22 16:41 JY Pass1.0180 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0178 4/15/22 15:17 JY 1.0181 5/9/22 16:42 JY Pass9425 -C 0.1573 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1572 4/15/22 14:26 JY 0.1574 5/9/22 16:27 JY Pass0.9892 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9891 5/9/22 16:27 JY 0.9892 5/11/22 15:34 JY Pass 9426 -C 0.1540 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1539 4/15/22 15:02 JY 0.1540 5/9/22 16:21 JY Pass 1.0135 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0133 4/15/22 15:04 JY 1.0137 5/9/22 16:22 JY Pass9427 -C 0.1548 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1546 4/15/22 14:29 JY 0.1550 5/9/22 15:57 JY Pass1.0531 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0529 4/15/22 14:31 JY 1.0532 5/9/22 15:57 JY Pass9428 -C 0.1580 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1578 4/15/22 14:24 JY 0.1582 5/9/22 16:32 JY Pass1.0264 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0262 4/15/22 14:26 JY 1.0265 5/9/22 16:32 JY Pass9429 -C 0.1537 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1536 4/15/22 12:44 JY 0.1538 5/9/22 15:41 JY Pass0.9699 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9698 4/15/22 12:43 JY 0.9699 5/9/22 15:41 JY Pass 9430 -C 0.1575 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1573 4/15/22 14:48 JY 0.1577 5/9/22 16:28 JY Pass1.0665 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0663 4/15/22 14:49 JY 1.0667 5/9/22 16:29 JY Pass9431 -C 0.1561 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1559 4/15/22 14:28 JY 0.1563 5/9/22 15:54 JY Pass1.1316 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1315 5/9/22 15:56 JY 1.1316 5/11/22 15:28 JY Pass9432 -C 0.1541 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1539 4/15/22 14:54 JY 0.1543 5/9/22 16:19 JY Pass1.0390 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0388 4/15/22 14:55 JY 1.0392 5/9/22 16:19 JY Pass9433 -C 0.1530 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1528 4/15/22 13:15 JY 0.1531 5/9/22 16:08 JY Pass 1.1016 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1014 4/15/22 14:34 JY 1.1017 5/9/22 16:09 JY Pass 9434 -C 0.1550 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1549 4/15/22 14:34 JY 0.1550 5/9/22 15:59 JY Pass1.1025 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1025 5/9/22 16:02 JY 1.1025 5/11/22 15:35 JY Pass9435 -C 0.1550 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1548 4/15/22 14:50 JY 0.1551 5/9/22 16:35 JY Pass1.0827 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0825 4/15/22 14:51 JY 1.0828 5/9/22 16:36 JY Pass9436 -C 0.1551 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1551 4/15/22 13:28 JY 0.1550 5/9/22 15:43 JY Pass1.0706 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0705 5/9/22 15:43 JY 1.0706 5/11/22 15:40 JY Pass9437 -C 0.1556 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1555 11/3/22 12:58 JY 0.1557 11/4/22 11:17 JY Pass 1.0332 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0331 11/3/22 12:57 JY 1.0332 11/4/22 11:16 JY Pass9438 -C 0.1533 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1531 11/3/22 13:55 JY 0.1534 11/4/22 11:19 JY Pass1.0574 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0572 11/3/22 13:53 JY 1.0575 11/4/22 11:19 JY Pass9439 -C 0.1560 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1559 11/3/22 13:57 JY 0.1560 11/4/22 11:20 JY Pass1.2124 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.2122 11/3/22 13:56 JY 1.2125 11/4/22 11:20 JY Pass9440 -C 0.1575 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1575 11/3/22 13:59 JY 0.1574 11/4/22 11:22 JY Pass0.7826 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7825 11/3/22 14:00 JY 0.7826 11/4/22 11:21 JY Pass 9441 -C 0.1590 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1589 11/3/22 13:20 JY 0.1591 11/4/22 11:25 JY Pass 1.0650 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0649 11/3/22 13:20 JY 1.0651 11/4/22 11:24 JY Pass9442 -C 0.1546 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1545 11/3/22 13:22 JY 0.1546 11/4/22 11:26 JY Pass0.8454 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8454 11/3/22 13:21 JY 0.8454 11/4/22 11:26 JY Pass9443 -C 0.1583 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1583 11/3/22 13:24 JY 0.1583 11/4/22 11:28 JY Pass1.2034 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.2034 11/3/22 13:23 JY 1.2033 11/4/22 11:27 JY Pass9444 -C 0.1525 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1524 11/3/22 13:26 JY 0.1526 11/4/22 11:36 JY Pass 1.3969 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.3967 11/3/22 13:24 JY 1.3970 11/4/22 11:35 JY Pass 9445 -C 0.1546 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1546 11/3/22 13:28 JY 0.1545 11/4/22 11:38 JY Pass0.9604 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9603 11/3/22 13:27 JY 0.9604 11/4/22 11:37 JY Pass9446 -C 0.1558 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1556 11/3/22 13:29 JY 0.1559 11/4/22 11:40 JY Pass1.2112 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.2111 11/3/22 13:28 JY 1.2112 11/4/22 11:39 JY Pass9447 -C 0.1534 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1535 11/1/22 14:59 JY 0.1532 11/3/22 13:30 JY Pass0.9651 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9651 11/1/22 14:58 JY 0.9650 11/3/22 13:30 JY Pass 9448 -C 0.1575 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1576 11/1/22 15:04 JY 0.1574 11/3/22 13:32 JY Pass 1.0571 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0571 11/1/22 15:03 JY 1.0570 11/3/22 13:31 JY Pass 9449 -C 0.1561 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1560 11/3/22 13:34 JY 0.1561 11/4/22 11:41 JY Pass1.1655 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.1653 11/3/22 13:33 JY 1.1657 11/4/22 11:40 JY Pass9450 -C 0.1555 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1554 11/1/22 15:05 JY 0.1556 11/3/22 13:36 JY Pass0.8187 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8187 11/1/22 15:05 JY 0.8187 11/3/22 13:35 JY Pass9451 -C 0.1569 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1569 11/3/22 13:38 JY 0.1568 11/4/22 11:42 JY Pass0.8635 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8635 11/3/22 13:37 JY 0.8634 11/4/22 11:42 JY Pass 9452 -C 0.1559 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1559 11/3/22 13:40 JY 0.1558 11/4/22 11:44 JY Pass 0.8964 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8965 11/3/22 13:39 JY 0.8962 11/4/22 11:43 JY Pass9453 -C 0.1576 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1576 11/1/22 15:02 JY 0.1576 11/3/22 13:42 JY Pass0.9063 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9063 11/1/22 15:01 JY 0.9062 11/3/22 13:41 JY Pass9454 -C 0.1563 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1563 11/3/22 14:02 JY 0.1563 11/4/22 11:46 JY Pass0.9041 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9040 11/3/22 14:01 JY 0.9041 11/4/22 11:45 JY Pass9455 -C 0.1569 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1569 11/1/22 15:01 JY 0.1568 11/3/22 13:00 JY Pass0.9825 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9826 11/1/22 15:00 JY 0.9824 11/3/22 12:59 JY Pass 9456 -C 0.1528 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1528 11/3/22 14:04 JY 0.1528 11/4/22 11:47 JY Pass0.9726 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9725 11/3/22 14:05 JY 0.9727 11/4/22 11:47 JY Pass9457 -C 0.1537 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1536 11/1/22 15:07 JY 0.1537 11/3/22 14:06 JY Pass1.0402 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 1.0402 11/1/22 15:07 JY 1.0402 11/3/22 14:05 JY Pass9458 -C 0.1527 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1527 11/3/22 13:02 JY 0.1526 11/4/22 11:49 JY Pass0.9788 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9787 11/3/22 13:03 JY 0.9789 11/4/22 11:49 JY Pass9459 -C 0.1546 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1546 11/3/22 13:05 JY 0.1546 11/4/22 11:51 JY Pass 0.9975 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9975 11/3/22 13:04 JY 0.9975 11/4/22 11:50 JY Pass 9460 -C 0.1560 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1561 11/1/22 14:57 JY 0.1559 11/3/22 14:08 JY Pass0.8822 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8823 11/1/22 14:57 JY 0.8821 11/3/22 14:08 JY Pass9461 -C 0.1588 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1587 11/3/22 13:07 JY 0.1588 11/4/22 11:53 JY Pass0.9010 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9009 11/3/22 13:06 JY 0.9011 11/4/22 11:52 JY Pass9462 -C 0.1564 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1563 11/3/22 14:10 JY 0.1565 11/4/22 11:54 JY Pass0.9135 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9133 11/3/22 14:09 JY 0.9136 11/4/22 11:53 JY Pass9463 -C 0.1568 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1567 11/3/22 14:12 JY 0.1568 11/4/22 11:55 JY Pass 0.9323 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9322 11/3/22 14:11 JY 0.9323 11/4/22 11:55 JY Pass9464 -C 0.1573 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1573 11/3/22 13:08 JY 0.1573 11/4/22 11:56 JY Pass0.9499 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9499 11/3/22 13:08 JY 0.9498 11/4/22 11:57 JY Pass9465 -C 0.1589 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1588 11/1/22 15:09 JY 0.1589 11/3/22 13:10 JY Pass0.9565 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9565 11/1/22 15:09 JY 0.9565 11/3/22 13:09 JY Pass9466 -C 0.1571 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1570 11/1/22 15:12 JY 0.1571 11/3/22 13:12 JY Pass0.9879 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.9878 11/1/22 15:11 JY 0.9879 11/3/22 13:11 JY Pass 9467 -C 0.1517 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1517 3/28/23 11:51 JY 0.1517 3/30/23 8:13 JY Pass 0.8526 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8525 3/28/23 11:50 JY 0.8526 3/30/23 8:13 JY Pass9468 -C 0.1515 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1515 3/28/23 11:58 JY 0.1515 3/30/23 8:01 JY Pass0.8352 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8352 3/28/23 11:58 JY 0.8352 3/30/23 8:01 JY Pass9469 -C 0.1523 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1523 3/28/23 12:02 JY 0.1523 3/30/23 7:56 JY Pass0.6786 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6785 3/28/23 12:01 JY 0.6786 3/30/23 7:56 JY Pass9470 -C 0.1528 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1528 3/28/23 11:57 JY 0.1528 3/30/23 8:06 JY Pass 0.7408 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7408 3/28/23 11:57 JY 0.7407 3/30/23 8:06 JY Pass 9471 -C 0.1516 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1515 3/28/23 11:55 JY 0.1516 3/30/23 8:08 JY Pass0.7630 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7628 3/28/23 11:55 JY 0.7632 3/30/23 8:07 JY Pass9472 -C 0.1514 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1514 3/28/23 11:54 JY 0.1513 3/30/23 8:12 JY Pass0.7708 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7706 3/28/23 11:53 JY 0.7710 3/30/23 8:11 JY Pass9473 -C 0.1524 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1524 3/28/23 12:00 JY 0.1524 3/30/23 7:55 JY Pass0.7966 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7966 3/28/23 11:59 JY 0.7966 3/30/23 7:54 JY Pass9474 -C 0.1526 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1526 3/28/23 12:07 JY 0.1525 3/30/23 8:10 JY Pass 0.8205 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8204 3/28/23 12:06 JY 0.8206 3/30/23 8:10 JY Pass 9475 -C 0.1507 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1505 3/28/23 11:48 JY 0.1508 3/30/23 8:07 JY Pass0.6860 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6858 3/28/23 11:47 JY 0.6861 3/30/23 8:06 JY Pass9476 -C 0.1523 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1523 3/28/23 11:52 JY 0.1523 3/30/23 8:15 JY Pass0.7630 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7627 3/28/23 11:53 JY 0.7632 3/30/23 8:15 JY Pass9477 -C 0.1518 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1518 3/28/23 12:04 JY 0.1517 3/30/23 8:00 JY Pass0.7087 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7088 3/28/23 12:04 JY 0.7085 3/30/23 7:59 JY Pass 9478 -C 0.1519 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1519 3/28/23 12:05 JY 0.1519 3/30/23 7:53 JY Pass 0.6894 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6894 3/28/23 12:05 JY 0.6894 3/30/23 7:53 JY Pass9479 -C 0.1547 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1547 3/28/23 12:11 JY 0.1547 3/30/23 7:52 JY Pass0.7276 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7276 3/28/23 12:11 JY 0.7276 3/30/23 7:52 JY Pass9480 -C 0.1582 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1582 3/28/23 12:10 JY 0.1581 3/30/23 8:14 JY Pass0.7092 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7091 3/28/23 12:10 JY 0.7092 3/30/23 8:13 JY Pass9481 -C 0.1549 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1549 3/28/23 12:09 JY 0.1549 3/30/23 8:13 JY Pass 0.7329 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7327 3/28/23 12:08 JY 0.7330 3/30/23 8:13 JY Pass 9482 -C 0.1590 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1589 3/28/23 12:08 JY 0.1590 3/30/23 7:58 JY Pass0.7457 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7456 3/28/23 12:07 JY 0.7457 3/30/23 7:58 JY Pass9483 -C 0.1572 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1572 3/28/23 11:46 JY 0.1572 3/30/23 7:59 JY Pass0.7230 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7230 3/28/23 11:45 JY 0.7229 3/30/23 7:59 JY Pass9484 -C 0.1479 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1479 3/28/23 11:50 JY 0.1479 3/30/23 8:01 JY Pass0.8274 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.8274 3/28/23 11:48 JY 0.8274 3/30/23 8:01 JY Pass9485 -C 0.1538 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1538 3/28/23 12:03 JY 0.1538 3/30/23 8:09 JY Pass 0.6921 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6920 3/28/23 12:02 JY 0.6921 3/30/23 8:09 JY Pass 9486 -C 0.1543 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1544 3/28/23 11:56 JY 0.1542 3/30/23 7:57 JY Pass0.7470 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7472 3/28/23 11:56 JY 0.7467 3/30/23 7:57 JY Pass9487 -C 0.1511 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1510 3/30/23 8:59 JY 0.1512 3/31/23 10:20 JY Pass0.6639 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6638 3/30/23 8:58 JY 0.6640 3/31/23 10:20 JY Pass9488 -C 0.1520 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1520 3/30/23 9:02 JY 0.1519 3/31/23 10:21 JY Pass0.6525 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6525 3/30/23 9:02 JY 0.6525 3/31/23 10:21 JY Pass9489 -C 0.1519 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1519 3/30/23 8:56 JY 0.1519 3/31/23 10:43 JY Pass 0.7079 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7079 3/30/23 8:55 JY 0.7079 3/31/23 10:43 JY Pass9490 -C 0.1521 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1521 3/30/23 9:01 JY 0.1520 3/31/23 10:24 JY Pass0.7141 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.7142 3/30/23 9:01 JY 0.7140 3/31/23 10:23 JY Pass9491 -C 0.1217 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1217 3/30/23 9:00 JY 0.1217 3/31/23 10:42 JY Pass0.6921 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6921 3/30/23 8:59 JY 0.6921 3/31/23 10:42 JY Pass9492 -C 0.1509 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1511 3/30/23 8:53 JY 0.1507 3/31/23 10:19 JY Pass0.6347 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6346 3/30/23 8:53 JY 0.6347 3/31/23 10:18 JY Pass 9493 -C 0.1514 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1515 3/30/23 8:57 JY 0.1513 3/31/23 10:43 JY Pass 0.6700 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6701 3/30/23 8:56 JY 0.6699 3/31/23 10:43 JY Pass9494 -C 0.1507 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1507 3/30/23 8:58 JY 0.1506 3/31/23 10:23 JY Pass0.6368 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6368 3/30/23 8:57 JY 0.6367 3/31/23 10:22 JY Pass9495 -C 0.1500 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1500 3/30/23 8:53 JY 0.1499 3/31/23 10:45 JY Pass0.6751 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6750 3/30/23 8:52 JY 0.6751 3/31/23 10:44 JY Pass9496 -C 0.1511 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.1511 3/30/23 8:54 JY 0.1510 3/31/23 10:25 JY Pass 0.6614 ESS GF2-108-HT 511014 0.6614 3/30/23 8:54 JY 0.6614 3/31/23 10:25 JY Pass 9489 Foil 9490 Foil 9480 Foil 9481 Foil 9482 Foil 9483 Foil 9484 Foil 9485 Foil 9486 Foil 9487 Foil 9488 Foil 9471 Foil 9472 Foil 9473 Foil 9474 Foil 9475 Foil 9476 Foil 9477 Foil 9478 Foil 9479 Foil 9468 Foil 9469 Foil 9470 Foil 9463 Foil 9464 Foil 9465 Foil 9466 Foil 9467 Foil 9458 Foil 9459 Foil 9460 Foil 9461 Foil 9462 Foil 9453 Foil 9454 Foil 9455 Foil 9456 Foil 9457 Foil 9448 Foil 9449 Foil 9450 Foil 9451 Foil 9452 Foil 9443 Foil 9444 Foil 9445 Foil 9446 Foil 9447 Foil 9438 Foil 9439 Foil 9440 Foil 9441 Foil 9442 Foil 9433 Foil 9434 Foil 9435 Foil 9436 Foil 9437 Foil 9428 Foil 9429 Foil 9430 Foil 9431 Foil 9432 Foil 9423 Foil 9424 Foil 9425 Foil 9426 Foil 9427 Foil 9418 Foil 9419 Foil 9420 Foil 9421 Foil 9422 Foil 9413 Foil 9414 Foil 9415 Foil 9416 Foil 9417 Foil 9408 Foil 9409 Foil 9410 Foil 9411 Foil 9412 Foil 9403 Foil 9404 Foil 9405 Foil 9406 Foil 9407 Foil 9398 Foil 9399 Foil 9400 Foil 9401 Foil 9402 Foil 9393 Foil 9394 Foil 9395 Foil 9396 Foil 9397 Foil 9388 Foil 9389 Foil 9390 Foil 9391 Foil 9392 Foil 9383 Foil 9384 Foil 9385 Foil 9386 Foil 9387 Foil 9381 Foil 9382 Foil 9491 Foil 9492 Foil 9493 Foil 9494 Foil 9495 Foil 9496 Foil 20 of 21 45 of 52 Appendix D 46 of 52 QA Data Location Source Project No. Parameter #1 #2 #3 Dn (Average)Difference 9/23/24 4 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.000 9/23/24 P-1167 no no no Date Probe or Thermocouple ID Reference Temp. (°F) Indicated Temp. (°F)Difference Criteria 9/23/24 PR-704-1 68.0 68.0 0.0% Date 09/23/24 09/24/24 09/25/24 Balance ID:SCALE76 SCALE76 SCALE76 Test Weight ID:SLC-1 KG-1 SLC-1 KG-1 SLC-1 KG-1 Certified Weight (g):1000.0 1000.0 1000.0 Measured Weight (g):999.8 999.8 999.8 Weight Difference (g):0.2 0.2 0.2 -- -- -- 9/23/24 Weather Station NA NA NA 9/23/24 M5-2600 DI Water 233598 Acetone 240414 Positive Pressure Leak Check Pass Date Barometric Pressure Evidence of damage? Reading Verified Calibration or Repair required? Utah Metal Works - Salt Lake City, UT Chopping Line Baghouse AST-2024-3762 Date Nozzle ID Nozzle Diameter (in.) Criteria Salt Lake City, UT Date Meter Box ID PM2.5 ≤ 0.004 in. Date Pitot ID Evidence of damage? Evidence of mis-alignment? Calibration or Repair required? ± 1.5 % (absolute) Field Balance Check ByReagent Lot#Field Prep performed Field Lot Date Weather Station Location 47 of 52 Document ID 620.004 Revision 23.1 Effective Date 8/29/23 Issuing Department Page 1 of 1 Console ID: Meter S/N: Critical Orifice S/N: (PbI) (PbF) (Pb) (Y)SH-73 SH-63 SH-63 SH-55 SH-55 (K')0.7864 0.7864 0.6007 0.601 0.4524 0.452 (VP)14.0 14.0 15.5 15.5 17.0 17.0 Initial DGM Volume, ft3 (VmI)866.200 892.300 920.500 940.700 963.900 979.400 Final DGM Volume, ft3 (VmF)891.744 917.835 940.172 960.475 978.765 997.191 Total DGM Volume, ft3 (Vm)25.544 25.535 19.672 19.775 14.865 17.791 Ambient Temperature, °F (Ta)67 67 67 67 69 65 Initial DGM Temperature, °F (TmI)67 67 67 67 69 65 Final DGM Temperature, °F (TmF)68 67 67 67 65 66 Average DGM Temperature, °F ( Tm)68 67 67 67 67 66 Elapsed Time (Θ)25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (ΔH)2.80 2.80 1.60 1.60 0.91 0.91 Standard Meter volume, ft3 (Vmstd)22.0609 22.0741 16.9476 17.0363 12.7811 15.3405 Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr)21.9347 21.9347 16.7550 16.7550 12.5947 15.1711 Meter Correction Factor (Y)0.994 0.994 0.989 0.983 0.985 0.989 Tolerance --0.005 0.005 0.000 0.006 0.004 0.000 Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @)1.767 1.769 1.726 1.726 1.734 1.726 Tolerance --0.026 0.027 0.015 0.015 0.007 0.015 Orifice Cal Check -- Meter Correction Factor (Y) Orifice Calibration Value (ΔH @) Accuracy Absolute Difference oF oR oF oR %oF 0 460 1 461 -0.2 1 68 528 66 526 0.4 2 100 560 98 558 0.4 2 223 683 223 683 0.0 0 248 708 249 709 -0.1 1 273 733 274 734 -0.1 1 300 760 300 760 0.0 0 400 860 399 859 0.1 1 500 960 498 958 0.2 2 600 1,060 599 1,059 0.1 1 700 1,160 701 1,161 -0.1 1 800 1,260 800 1,260 0.0 0 900 1,360 900 1,360 0.0 0 1,000 1,460 1,001 1,461 -0.1 1 1,100 1,560 1,101 1,561 -0.1 1 1,200 1,660 1,201 1,661 -0.1 1 Calibration Date: Yes 0.80 0.80 0.68 DGM Calibration-Orifices Tech Services 25.61 25.60 25.61 K' Factor, ft3·R1/2 / in. WC·min Piecal 520B Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg Initial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Average Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Critifcal Orifice ID Calibration Detail M5-2600 257255 SH 40-73 Positive Pressure Leak Check Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter 0.989 1.741 Personnel Reference Calibrator Make: Reference Calibrator Model: Reference Calibrator S/N: Calibration Detail Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor Reference Temp.Display Temp. Practical Instrument Electronics 121645 Charles HortonReviewed By: Xander Gray KrahnCalibration By: 5/3/2024 48 of 52 49 of 52 Appendix E 50 of 52 9/23/2024 total minutes: 470 190549 3 4500 92 4408 9/23/2024 9/23/2024 total minutes: 470 total hours: 7.38 190550 3 4500 89 4411 9/23/2024 total hours: 7.38 190601 3 4500 83 4417 9/23/2024 190602 3 4500 89 4411 9/23/2024 190603 3 4500 86 4414 9/23/2024 190604 3 4000 81 3919 9/23/2024 190605 3 4500 89 4411 9/23/2024 190606 3 4500 87 4413 9/23/2024 TEST TIME: 190607 3 4500 89 4411 9/23/2024 TEST TIME: 60331 128 lbs per minute 253 minutes 40000 39215 25490 54 lbs per minute 253 minutes 7702 lbs per hour TOTAL #'S FOR TEST 3254 lbs per hour TOTAL #'S FOR TEST 32384 LBS 13662 LBS 9/24/2024 total minutes: 460 190608 3 4500 92 4408 9/24/2024 9/24/2024 total minutes: 460 total hours: 7.66 hours 190609 3 4500 88 4412 9/24/2024 total hours: 7.66 hours 190610 3 4500 87 4413 9/24/2024 190611 3 4500 84 4416 9/24/2024 190612 3 4500 82 4418 9/24/2024 190613 3 4500 84 4416 9/24/2024 190614 3 4000 93 3907 9/24/2024 TEST TIME: 190617 3 4500 83 4417 9/24/2024 53549 114 lbs per minute 253 minutes 34807 22625 49 lbs per minute TEST TIME: 6836 lbs per hour TOTAL #'S FOR TEST 2940 lbs per hour 249 minutes 28842 LBS TOTAL #'S FOR TEST 12201 LBS 9/25/2024 total minutes: 465 190618 3 4500 87 4413 9/25/2024 9/25/2024 total minutes: 465 total hours: 7.75 190619 3 4500 86 4414 9/25/2024 total hours: 7.75 190620 3 4500 91 4409 9/25/2024 190621 3 4500 90 4410 9/25/2024 190622 3 4500 85 4415 9/25/2024 190623 3 4500 80 4420 9/25/2024 190624 3 4500 80 4420 9/25/2024 190625 3 4500 94 4406 9/25/2024 190626 3 4000 78 3922 9/25/2024 60352 128 lbs per minute TEST TIME: 39229 25499 55 lbs per minute TEST TIME: 7704.55 lbs per hour 253 minutes 3300 lbs per hour 245 minutes TOTAL #'S FOR TEST TOTAL #'S FOR TEST 32384 LBS 13475 LBS OUTPUTOUTPUT 51 of 52 Last Page of Report 52 of 52