DAQ-2024-011242

1

DAQC-1068-24
Site ID 13031 (B5)

MEMORANDUM

TO: CEM FILE – PACIFICORP – Lake Side Plant

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Rob Leishman, Environmental Scientist

DATE: October 18, 2024

SUBJECT: Sources: Units CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22
Contact: Veronica Reyes – 801-796-1916
Tom Wiscomb – 801-220-2373
Location: 1825 North Pioneer Lane, Lindon, Utah County, UT
Test Contractor: Mostardi Platt
FRS ID#: UT00000049001501001
Permit/AO#: Title V operating permit #1501001005, dated January 22, 2021
Subject: Review of RA/PST Protocol dated October 14, 2024

On October 14, 2024, DAQ received a protocol for a RA/PST (relative accuracy/performance
specification test) of the PacifiCorp Lake Side Plant Units CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22 in Lindon, UT.
Testing will be performed on December 9-12, 2024, to determine the relative accuracy of the O2, NOx,
and CO monitoring systems.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK
2. RM 7E used to determine NOx concentrations of emissions: OK
3. RM 10 used to determine CO concentrations of emissions: OK

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send attached protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

1 8 2
Continuous Emissions
Monitoring System Relative
Accuracy Test Audit
Protocol
PacifiCorp
Lake Side Power Plant
CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22
1825 N Pioneer Lane, Lindon, Utah
Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ)
Title V Operating Permit # 4900241002
Protocol No. P244704A
Crown Point, IN I Mendota Heights, MN I Denver, CO | Henderson, NV
Corporate Headquarters 888 Industrial Drive Elmhurst, Illinois 60126
630-993-2100
Continuous Emissions Monitoring System Relative Accuracy
Test Audit Protocol
PacifiCorp
Lake Side Power Plant
CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22
1825 N Pioneer Lane, Lindon, Utah
Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ)
Title V Operating Permit # 4900241002
Protocol Date
October 11, 2024
Submitted By
Daniel Kossack [phone], Phone [e-mail], Email
© Copyright 2024 All rights reserved in Mostardi Platt
Protocol No. P244704A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Contact Information ................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 1
Lake Side Power Plant ............................................................................................................................. 1
Process Parameters ................................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 SPECIFIC TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................. 2
4.0 TEST REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 3
4.1 RATA Requirements ........................................................................................................................... 3
5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................................................. 3
6.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................................... 3
7.0 PLANT REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 4
8.0 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................................... 4
Method 1 Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination .......................................................................... 4
Method 3A Oxygen (O2) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Determination ......................................................... 4
Method 7E Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Determination .................................................................................... 5
Method 10 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Determination ................................................................................... 5
Method 19 NOx Emission Rate Determination ......................................................................................... 5
Gaseous Sampling Plan ........................................................................................................................... 6
9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES..................................................................................................... 6
GENERAL INFORMATION APPENDED QSTI Information
Test Section Diagram Sample Train Diagrams Calculation Nomenclature and Formula Calibration Data
Field Data Sheets
Protocol No. P244704A – PacifiCorp
Lake Side – CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22 1 © Mostardi Platt
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Mostardi Platt will perform a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) to evaluate monitored levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and oxygen (O2) on each of four (4) gas-fired combustion turbines, designated as CT11, CT12,
CT21, and CT22; for PacifiCorp at the Lake Side Power Plant in Lindon, Utah. Testing will be performed to meet the requirements of the Utah Division of Air Quality Title V Operating Permit # 4900241002, the requirements of United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Title
40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60 (40CFR60), as applicable.
1.1 Project Contact Information
The identification of individuals associated with the test program is summarized below.
Representative Address Contact
Testing Coordinators PacifiCorp 1407 W North Temple, Suite 210 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Mr. Tom Wiscomb Environmental Advisor (801)[e-mail]
Test Facility Representative PacifiCorp
Lake Side Power Plant 1825 N. Pioneer Lane Vineyard, Utah 84024
Ms. Veronica Reyes
Environmental Analyst (801)[e-mail]
Test Company Representative Mostardi Platt 702 West 48th Avenue, Unit A Denver, CO 80216
Mr. Robert Carlisle AET Lead – Denver (630)[e-mail]
2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Lake Side Power Plant
The Lake Side Power Plant comprises four combined-cycle combustion turbines designated CT11, CT12, CT21 and CT22.
Process Parameters
During each test run, the following specific plant parameters will be collected:
•Unit load (MW)
•Heat Input
The following parameters will be collected at the test location:
•Oxygen concentration
•Carbon monoxide concentration
•Nitrogen oxides concentration
Protocol No. P244704A – PacifiCorp
Lake Side – CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22 2 © Mostardi Platt
3.0 SPECIFIC TEST PROCEDURES
Detailed test procedures are included in Section 6. Complete test runs will be performed in accordance with the following USEPA reference methods as specified in 40CFR60, Appendix A.
1.The reference method traverse points will be selected in accordance with USEPA Method1 to ensure acquisition of representative samples of pollutant and diluent concentrationsover the flue gas cross section and to meet the requirements of Performance Specification(P.S.) 2 in Appendix B of 40CFR60 for NOX; P.S. 3 and Method 3A for O2; and P.S. 4 or
4A and Method 10 for CO.
2.O2, NOx, and CO tests will be performed using USEPA Methods 3A, 7E, and 10,
(40CFR60, Appendix A) respectively, and 40CFR75 (Appendix A) at each location. Aminimum of nine (9) tests will be completed consisting of a minimum of twenty-one (21)minutes of continuous gaseous monitoring per test run. Sampling will be performed,depending on the results of the stratification test (if applicable), at three points (0.4, 1.2,and 2.0 meters or 17%, 50% and 83% of stack diameter) from the inside wall of theductwork as per P.S. 2, 4, and/or 4A. The average gas effluent concentrations for eachrun will be determined from the average gas concentrations displayed by the gasanalyzers and adjusted for the zero and upscale sampling system bias checksimmediately preceding and following each run.
3.The reference method tests will be conducted so that they will yield results representativeof the pollution concentration and emission rate from each unit and can be correlated withthe measurements from the continuous NOx, CO, and O2 monitoring systems. The O2measurements will be conducted simultaneously with the pollutant concentrations. To
properly correlate individual CEM pollutant values with the reference method data (NOx,CO, and O2) the beginning and end of each reference method test run will be marked toinclude the exact time of day on the data acquisition system.
4.Each relative accuracy test audit will be completed within a 7-day period while the unit iscombusting its primary fuel, pipeline natural gas.
5.Oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) test runs will be performed at each location usingUSEPA Method 3A, (40CFR60, Appendix A, instrumental analyzer method). The averageO2 and CO2 gas effluent concentrations for each run will be determined from the averagegas concentrations displayed by the gas analyzers and adjusted for the zero and upscalesampling system bias checks immediately preceding and following each run.
6.USEPA Method 19 will be used to calculate emissions to units of lb/MMBtu and lb/hr. Unitsof lb/MMBtu and lb/hr will be calculated based on the standard O2 based fuel factor (Fc)for natural gas of 8710 standard cubic feet per million British thermal units (scf/MMBtu).
Protocol No. P244704A – PacifiCorp
Lake Side – CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22 3 © Mostardi Platt
4.0 TEST REQUIREMENTS
4.1 RATA Requirements
Sources Pollutant Tested Acceptable Relative Accuracy Method/Regulation Citation
CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22
Nitrogen Oxides (lb/MMBtu)
≤ 7.5 % of mean reference method value or ≤ 0.015 lb/MMBtu difference if emission rate is ≤0.200 lb/MMBtu
USEPA Methods 3A and 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A; Performance Specifications 2 and 3; and 40CFR75, Appendix A and B
Nitrogen Oxides (ppmvd @ 15% O2)
≤ 20% of mean reference method value or ≤ 10% of applicable standard
USEPA Method 3A and 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A
Nitrogen Oxides (lb/hr)
≤ 20% of mean reference method value or ≤ 10% of applicable standard
USEPA Method 3A and 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A
Oxygen (% dry) ≤ 7.5 % of mean reference method value or ≤ 0.7 % difference
USEPA Methods 3A, 40CFR60, Appendix A; Performance Specification 3; and 40CFR75, Appendix A and B
Carbon Monoxide
(ppmvd @ 15% O2)
≤ 10 % of mean reference method value, ≤ 5% of applicable standard, or ≤ 5 ppmvd of the absolute difference plus the confidence coefficient
USEPA Method 10, 40CFR60, Appendix A and Performance Specification 4 or 4A
Carbon Monoxide
(lb/hr)
≤ 20% of mean reference method value or ≤ 10% of applicable standard
USEPA Method 3A and 10, 40CFR60, Appendix A
5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mostardi Platt will provide the scope of services described above according to the following schedule:
Day Activity On-Site Hours
12/8/24 Mobilize to job site & set up test equipment. 4
12/9-10/24 Perform RATAs on 1st & 2nd Unit. 10
12/11-12/24 Perform RATAs on 3rd & 4th Unit. 10
6.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL
Mostardi Platt will provide the following personnel to conduct the scope of services described above:
1 Senior Project Manager
2 Test Engineers
Protocol No. P244704A – PacifiCorp
Lake Side – CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22 4 © Mostardi Platt
7.0 PLANT REQUIREMENTS
Mostardi Platt must be supplied with the following items in order to complete this test program:
1.Safe access to test positions.
2.Electrical power 110 V, 30 A, 60 cycle service at the test locations.3. Four-inch test ports cleaned and loose prior to arrival of test crew.4.Sufficient lighting at the test site.
5.Safety belts, if required.6.Plant or pollution control equipment-operating data, if required for report.7.Fuel samples, if required.
8.Washroom facilities for use by members of the test crew.9.Steady load during test period.10.All data and summaries required to complete the full report including but not limited tooperating data during that period, and factory calibrations and equipment descriptionsrequired for that report.11.Communication between the test location and the control room.12.Parking location to place Mostardi Platt mobile trailer within 200 feet of samplinglocations with access to multiple 110 V, 20 amp, 60-cycle or 220 V, 50 amp, 60-cyclecircuits
8.0 TEST PROCEDURES
All testing, sampling, analytical, and calibration procedures used for this test program will be performed as described in the 40CFR60, Appendix A, Methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, 7E, 10, 19; and the latest revisions thereof.
The following methodologies will be performed during the test program:
Method 1 Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination
Test measurement points are selected in accordance with USEPA Method 1, 40CFR60, Appendix A. The characteristics of the measurement locations are summarized below.
Sample Point Selection
Test Location Stack Diameter Port Length
Upstream Distance (in./dia.)
Downstream Distance (in./dia.) Test Parameter Number of Sampling Points
CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22
216” 7” ~120/~0.6 ~576/~2.7 NOX, O2, CO Stratification: 12
RATA: TBD
Method 3A Oxygen (O2) and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Determination Flue gas O2 and CO2 concentrations will be determined in accordance with USEPA Method 3A. A Servomex analyzer will be used to determine O2 and CO2 concentrations during the particulate sampling. Sample will be drawn continuously from the exhaust gas stream throughout testing. A high-range, mid-range and zero calibration is performed using USEPA Protocol calibration gases. Mid-range and zero calibrations are performed after each test run.
Protocol No. P244704A – PacifiCorp
Lake Side – CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22 5 © Mostardi Platt
Method 7E Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Determination
Method 7E, 40CFR60, Appendix A, is used for determining nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from each source. A gas sample is continuously extracted from the gas stream through a heated sample probe and gas conditioning system. A portion of the sample stream is conveyed via a sampling line to gas analyzers for determination of NOx content. Prior to emissions sampling, the nitric oxide (NO)/NOx analyzer is zeroed and calibrated. High-range, mid-range, and zero gases are introduced into the NOx sampling system.
The sample gas manifold is then adjusted for emissions sampling. After each test run, the zeroes are checked and mid-range NOx gas is introduced into the sampling system to check calibration.
The chemiluminescent reaction of NO and ozone (O3) provides the basis for this instrument operation. Specifically:
lighth where
hONOONO223
=
++→+
υ
υ
Light emission results when electronically excited nitrogen dioxide (NO2) molecules revert to their ground state. To measure NO concentrations, the gas sample to be analyzed is blended with O3 in a reaction chamber. The resulting chemiluminescence is monitored through an optical filter by a high-sensitivity photomultiplier positioned at one end of the chamber. The filter/photomultiplier combination responds to light in a narrow-wavelength band unique to the above reaction (hence, no interference). The output from the photomultiplier is linearly proportional to the NO concentration.
To measure NOx concentrations (i.e., NO plus NO2), the sample gas flow is diverted through a NO2-to-NO converter. The chemiluminescent response in the reaction chamber to the converted effluent is linearly proportional to the NOx concentration entering the converter. The instrument is
operated in the NOx mode during all tests and calibrations.
Method 10 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Determination
Stack gas CO concentrations and emission rates are determined in accordance with Method 10.
A Thermo Fischer Scientific 48 Series Gas Filter Correlation Carbon Monoxide Analyzer is used to determine CO concentrations, in the manner specified in the Method. The instrument operates in a range of 0 ppm to the high-level span calibration gas to be determined on site.
A list of calibration gases used and the results of all calibration and other required quality assurance checks will be appended to the final report. Copies of calibration gas certifications will also be appended to the final report. This testing will meet the performance specifications as outlined in the Method. Calibration gases are Protocol One gases.
Method 19 NOx Emission Rate Determination
USEPA Method 19 will be used to calculate the NOx, CPM, PM10, and PM2.5 emission rates from the test locations in units of lb/MMBtu as well as the NOx and CO emission rates in units of lb/hr. The calculations will be based on the O2 content of the sample gas and an appropriate F factor, which is the ratio of combustion gas volumes to heat input. An O2 based F factor of 8,710 dscf/MMBtu for combustion of natural gas will be used.
Protocol No. P244704A – PacifiCorp
Lake Side – CT11, CT12, CT21, and CT22 6 © Mostardi Platt
Gaseous Sampling Plan Mostardi Platt will complete a minimum of nine (9) 21-minute tests at each unit. The system will be calibrated as described above. Following each mid-test calibration, a stable on-line response will be regained prior the start of the next run. Data will be collected by a data logger. The actual time of each test will be compared to the output of the monitor taking into consideration response times determined on both the Mostardi Platt and plant CEM system. The determination of relative accuracy will be calculated based on the emissions as reported by each system corrected on the same basis.
9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
Mostardi Platt recognizes the previously described reference methods to be very technique-oriented and attempts to minimize all factors which can increase error by implementing its Quality Assurance Program into every segment of its testing activities.
Dry and wet test meters are calibrated according to methods described in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Sections 3.3.2, 3.4.2 and 3.5.2. Percent error
for the wet test meter according to the methods is less than the allowable error of 1.0%. The dry test meters measure the test sample volumes to within 2% at the flowrate and conditions encountered during sampling. Calibration gases are Protocol One gases.
Raw data is kept on file at the Mostardi Platt offices in Elmhurst, Illinois. All samples from the test program will be retained for 60 days after the submittal of the report, after which they will be discarded unless Mostardi Platt is advised otherwise.
Calculations are performed by computer. An explanation of the nomenclature and calculations along with the complete test results will be appended. Calibration data and copies of the raw field data sheets will also be appended.
Mostardi Platt is a self-certified air emissions testing body (AETB) per 40CFR75, Appendix A, Section 6.1.2. The AETB information is summarized below:
AETB Information
AETB Name/Address: Mostardi Platt
702 W 48th Avenue, Unit A
Denver, Co 80216
AETB Phone Number: [phone]
QSTI Name: Robert Carlisle
AETB Email: [e-mail]
QSTI Exam Date: 1/8/2021
QSTI: Exam Provider Name: Source Evaluation Society
QSTI Exam Provider Email: [e-mail]
APPENDIX

QI Last Name
[REQUIRED]
QI First Name
[REQUIRED]
QI Middle
Initial
AETB Name
[REQUIRED]
AETB Phone Number
[REQUIRED]
AETB Email
[REQUIRED]
Exam Date mm/dd/yyyy
[REQUIRED]
Exam Provider Name
[REQUIRED]
Exam Provider Email
[REQUIRED]Comment
Beckham Kenneth J Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 5/18/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Benninghoff Aaron W Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 9/8/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)Burton Stuart L Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/4/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Carlisle Robert W Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/8/2021 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Colangelo Nicholas C Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 4/4/2024 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)Coleman Paul F Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 3/22/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Crivlare Jeffrey M Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/4/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Dunn Christian P Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 10/27/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Eldridge Christopher S Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 2/18/2021 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)Gross Jeffery M Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/19/2024 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Hendricks Benjamin W Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/30/2020 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Howe Jacob W Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 2/17/2021 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)Jensen Christopher E Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/4/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Jones Kyle L Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/11/2021 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Kossack Daniel J Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 11/11/2021 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Kukla Joshua R Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 4/4/2024 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)Lipinski Michal Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/31/2020 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Peterson Mark E Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/17/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Petrovich William A Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 2/4/2022 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)Russ Timothy E Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 4/8/2020 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Sands Stuart T Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 1/5/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Sather Michael P Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 2/7/2020 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Sollars Richard J Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 7/28/2023 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Sorce Angelo M Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 2/18/2022 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)
Trezak Christopher S Mostard Platt 630-993-2100 [e-mail] 4/14/2020 Source Evaluation Society [e-mail] Group V (Part 75)

EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS (PM Traverse and Stratification Test)
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
4 5 6 2
1
Disturbance
MeasurementSite
Length> 1/2 Dia.
Length> 2 Dia.Disturbance

Job: PacifiCorp Lake Side Power Plant Test Location: CT11, CT12, CT21, CT22 Stack Diameter: 216 inches Stack Area: 254.469 square feet No. Sample Points Across Diameter: 6
No. of Ports:
Port Length (Inches):
4
7

USEPA Methods 3A, 7E, and 10 Extractive Gaseous Sampling Diagram

Heated Probe
3-Way Calibration “T”
Heated Line
Sample Gas Line
Calibration Gas Line
Sample Gas Manifold
Calibration Gases
Data Acquisition and Report Generation
Gas Analyzer
Moisture Removal System
In-Line Filter
NOx

CO2
O2
CO

Exhaust to Safe Location

Mostardi Platt Natural Gas Emission Rate Calculations
A pollutant emission rate (E), expressed as pounds of pollutant per million Btu heat input from the fuel combusted can be calculated by the following methods: A. C = Cs/7000 where, C = pollutant concentration, lb/dscf cs = pollutant concentration, grains/dscf B. If fuel flow is monitored and the fuel combusted during the test is sampled and analyzed for gross calorific value, then:
E = 6sd10GCV (lb/hr) rateflow fuel
CQ ×

hrdscf ,conditions standard atflow gas volumetricdry = Q
lbBtu value,calorific gross =GCV
Btu million per lbs = E where,
sd

C. If an integrated gas sample is taken during the test and analyzed for %CO2 or %O2,
dry basis by volume, with an approved USEPA Method 3 or 3A gas analyzer, then
where,)%O - (20.9
20.9 F C = E or, )(%CO
100F C = E
22c
%CO2 and %O2 are expressed as percent values: Fc = a factor representing a ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide generated to the
calorific value of the fuel combusted, 1040 scf CO2/million Btu. F = a factor representing a ratio of the volume of dry flue gases generated to the
calorific value of the fuel combusted, 8710 dscf/million Btu. D. If fuel sample increments are taken during the test and an ultimate analysis is
performed to determine GCV, then
[]62
3
c
10GCV
)(%O 0.46 - (%N) 0.14 + (%S) 0.57 + (%C) 1.53 + (%H) 3.64 = F
percent as expressed by weight content carbon=%C where,GCV
(%C)10321F
×
×=
1. H = Hydrogen, percent 2. C = Carbon, percent 3. S = Sulfur, percent 4. N = Nitrogen, percent 5. O = Oxygen, percent

Mostardi Platt Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) Calculations and Bias Adjustment Factor Calculation Mean Difference
∑=
=
n
1i
din
1d
Standard Deviation

212n
1i
in
1i
2i
1n
n
d
d
Sd






−






−
=
∑∑=
=
Confidence Coefficient
n
SdtCC0.025=

Relative Accuracy
100avg RM
CCdRA ×+=

Bias Adjustment Factor
avg CEM
d1BAF+=

MOSTARDI PLATT Emission Rate Calculations
A pollutant emission rate (E), expressed as pounds of pollutant per million Btu heat input from the fuel combusted can be calculated by several methods as follows: A. C = Cs/7000 where, C = pollutant concentration, lb/dscf cs = pollutant concentration, grains/dscf B. If fuel flow is monitored and the fuel combusted during the test is sampled and analyzed for gross calorific value, then:
E = 6sd10GCV (lb/hr) rateflow fuel
CQ ×

dscf/hr ,conditions standard atflow gas volumetricdry = Q
Btu/lb value,calorific gross =GCV
Btu million per lbs = E where,
sd

C. If an integrated gas sample is taken during the test and analyzed for %CO2 or %O2, dry basis by volume, with an approved USEPA Method 3 or 3A gas analyzer, then
where,)%O - (20.9
20.9 F C = E or, )(%CO
100F C = E
22c
%CO2 and %O2 are expressed as percent values: .
D. If fuel sample increments are taken and composited during the test and an ultimate analysis is performed and the GCV is determined, then
[]62
3
c
10GCV
)(%O 0.46 - (%N) 0.14 + (%S) 0.57 + (%C) 1.53 + (%H) 3.64 = F
percent as expressed by weight content carbon=%C where,GCV
(%C)10321F
×
×=
1. H = Hydrogen, percent 2. C = Carbon, percent 3. S = Sulfur, percent 4. N = Nitrogen, percent 5. O = Oxygen, percent

PART 75 GASEOUS FIELD DATA SHEET

Project Number: Date:
Client: Operator:
Test Location: Fuel Factor:

Time Reference Method Data Volumetric Flow Data
Test Start End NOX ppm SO2 ppm O2 % Time scfh, RM Data scfh, CEM Data

Calibration Corrected RM Data CEM Data
Test NOX ppm CO ppm O2 % NOX lb/MMBtu NOX ppm CO ppm O2 % NOX lb/MMBtu

CEMS System Information
PRIMARY SYSTEM

Instrument Type Manufacturer Model Number Serial Number
NOx
O2 CO

GENERAL INFORMATION

Fuel Type
Fuel Factor
Facility Name
Unit Designation
Name of Primary CEMS Contact
Primary CEMS Contact Phone Number

GASEOUS CALIBRATION SUMMARY

Cal Run
Cal Level

Test Location

Cylinder ID Serial Number
Cal Gas Type
Cal
Time

Expected
Cal Value

Actual Response

Difference (% of cal value)
Drift (% of span)

Cylinder Pressure

Pre 1
Zero N/A
Low N/A
Mid N/A
High N/A

Post 1/ Pre 2
Zero
Low
Mid
High

Post 2/ Pre 3
Zero
Low
Mid
High

Post 3
Zero
Low
Mid
High

Zero
Low
Mid
High

Zero
Low
Mid
High

Project: Date:
Client: Operator:
Location: Analyzer ID:
Analyzer Range:

CALIBRATION SUMMARY Project Number: Date:
Client: Operator:
Test Location: Box Truck:

Analyzer Type, S/N, and Span
Cal Level Cylinder ID Serial Number
Expected Cal Value Actual Response Difference As % of Span
Cylinder Pressure (psi)
Cylinder Expiration Date
CO2 Zero
Mid
High
O2 Zero
Mid
High