DDW-2024-012363

Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>
Boulder Mountain Guest Ranch PER/DWSP
3 messages
Richard Emerson <[e-mail]>Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:27 PM
To: Melissa Noble <[e-mail]>, Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>, Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>, Paul Wright
<[e-mail]>, John Files <[e-mail]>, Parker Vercimak <[e-mail]>, Kyler Nielsen
<[e-mail]>
I've attached the After the Fact PER and DWSP for Boulder Mountain Guest Ranch.
I was told the deadline for this report is today. I have been told Mr. Johnson is still working on LUA signatures so I have included the
unsigned LUAs in the appendix.
Please let me or Kyler Nielsen know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Rich Emerson, P.G.
[phone]
09110-WS001-PER-DWSP-2024.pdf
6312K
Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 1:22 PM
To: Richard Emerson <[e-mail]>
Cc: Melissa Noble <[e-mail]>, Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>, Paul Wright <[e-mail]>, John Files
<[e-mail]>, Parker Vercimak <[e-mail]>, Kyler Nielsen <[e-mail]>
Received, thank you. I have added this combined PER/DWSP plan to our queue for review. Source protection staff will reach out with
any questions, upon review.
[Quoted text hidden]
--
Deidre Beck, PG, GISP
Environmental Scientist III | Permitting
M: [phone]
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
Emails to and from this email address may be considered public records and thus subject to Utah GRAMA
requirements.
Noah Zorsky <[e-mail]>Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 9:35 AM
To: Richard Emerson <[e-mail]>
Cc: Melissa Noble <[e-mail]>, Paul Wright <[e-mail]>, John Files <[e-mail]>, Parker
Vercimak <[e-mail]>, Kyler Nielsen <[e-mail]>, Deidre Beck <[e-mail]>
Rich,
We've reviewed the After the Fact PER/DWSP plan for Boulder Mountain Guest Ranch. Two things that will need to be addressed
before the PER requirements are considered fulfilled:
1. There are septic systems located within the management area. This is considered a violation of rule R309-600-13(2)(b)(iii).
Unless a hydrogeologic report in accordance with R309-600-9(6)(b)(ii) verifies that septic does not impact the spring, the
system will need to request an exception to this rule.
2. Signed land use agreements are needed. It sounds like the collection of these is still in progress. Since the two mile delineation
has quite a few landowners within it, I imagine it may be challenging to receive all of the signatures. If you are unable to receive
all of the LUAs, an exception to R309-600-13(2)(d) will be needed.
Let me know if you have any questions
Noah Zorsky, PG
Environmental Scientist II | Division of Drinking Water | Source Protection
P: [phone]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
M: [phone]
[e-mail]
drinkingwater.utah.gov
[Quoted text hidden]