DAQ-2024-010905

1

DAQC-1014-24
Site ID 101695 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – UINTA WAX OPERATING, LLC – RD West Pad

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Bushman, Environmental Scientist

DATE: October 4, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: One (1) Caterpillar G3406TA engine
Contact: Karen Pratt: [phone]
Location: Uintah County, UT
Test Contractor: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
Permit/AO#: Permit by Rule
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of stack test report dated September 9, 2024

On September 26, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for one (1) Caterpillar
G3406TA engine at RD West Pad, Uintah County, UT. Testing was performed August 6, 2024, to
demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in Utah Administrative Code R307-510 and 40
CFR Part 60, Subpart JJJJ. The calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Pollutant Method Tester Results DAQ Results Limits
Caterpillar
G3406TA
SN: 4FD01331
August 6,
2024
NOx 7E 0.00 g/bhp-hr 0.00 g/bhp-hr 1.0 g/bhp-hr
CO 10 0.80 g/bhp-hr 0.798 g/bhp-hr 2.0 g/bhp-hr
VOC 25A 0.22 g/bhp-hr 0.198 g/bhp-hr 0.7 g/bhp-hr

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The stack test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: The emissions from the Caterpillar G3406TA engine should be
considered to have been in compliance with the emission limits
of UAC R307-510 and 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart JJJJ during
testing.

ATTACHMENTS: DAQ stack test review excel spreadsheets, Uinta Wax Operating,
LLC stack test report.
Uinta Wax Operating, LLC
RD West Pad
Uintah County, UT
Caterpillar G3406TA SN: 4FD01331
Test Date: 8/6/24
Run #1 2 3 Average
Start Time 10:36 11:50 13:01
Stop Time 11:35 12:49 14:00
Sample Duration (minutes)60 60 60
BHP Engine Load - Actual (bhp) 177 179 178 178
BSFC Brake-Specific Fuel Consupmtion (Btu/bhp-hr) (1)9,400 9,400 9,400 9,400
Pbar Barometric Pressure (" Hg)30.00 29.99 29.95 29.98
Yd Meter Y Factor (unitless)1.0440 1.0440 1.0440 1.0440
Tm Meter Temperature (°F)67 68 71 69
Vm Sample Volume (ft3)26.500 26.500 26.500 26.500
Vlc Moisture (g)237.0 219.3 93.7 183.3
O2%vd O2 (%vd)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
N2%vd N2 (%vd)100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
dry NOX (ppmvd)0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
dry CO (ppmvd) 301.7 292.1 293.2 295.7
wet TVOC (ppmvw as C3H8)44.9 43.8 25.0 37.9
Run #1 2 3 Average
MMBtu/hr Fuel Use (MMBtu/hr)1.6647 1.6864 1.6713 1.6741
Run #1 2 3 Average
Vmstd Sample Volume (dscf)27.762 27.700 27.546 27.669
Vwstd Moisture Volume (scf)11.18 10.34 4.42 8.65
Bws Measured Moisture Content (%/100)0.182 0.183 0.199 0.188
Bws Actual Moisture Content (%/100)0.182 0.183 0.199 0.188
MD Molecular Weight Dry (lb/lb-mole)28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00
MA Molecular Weight Wet (lb/lb-mole)26.18 26.17 26.01 26.12
Est. FC Estimated Fuel Consumption (MMBtu/hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Limits
Est. bhp Estimated Engine Load from BSFC (bhp) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
wet O2 (%vw)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
wet CO2 (%vw)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
wet NOX (ppmvw)0.041 0.081 0.040 0.054
15 NOX (ppmvd @ 15% O2)0.014 0.028 0.014 0.019
lb/hr - M19 NOX (lb/hr)0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
g/bhp-hr - M19 NOX (g/bhp-hr)0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.0
wet CO (ppmvw) 246.767 238.661 234.887 240.105
15 CO (ppmvd @ 15% O2)85.161 82.464 82.781 83.469
lb/hr - M19 CO (lb/hr)0.318 0.312 0.310 0.313
g/bhp-hr - M19 CO (g/bhp-hr)0.814 0.789 0.792 0.798 2.0
dry TVOC (ppmvd as C3H8)54.917 53.649 31.236 46.601
15 TVOC (ppmvd as C3H8 @ 15% O2)15.503 15.145 8.818 13.155
lb/hr - M19 TVOC (lb/hr as C3H8)0.091 0.090 0.052 0.078
g/bhp-hr - M19 TVOC (g/bhp-hr as C3H8)0.233 0.228 0.132 0.198
dry NMNEOC (ppmvd as C3H8)54.917 53.649 31.236 46.601
15 NMNEOC (ppmvd as C3H8 @ 15% O2)15.503 15.145 8.818 13.155
lb/hr - M19 NMNEOC (lb/hr as C3H8)0.091 0.090 0.052 0.078
g/bhp-hr - M19 NMNEOC (g/bhp-hr as C3H8)0.233 0.228 0.132 0.198 0.7
Field Reference Method Data
Reference Method Calculations
Fuel Use Data and Calculations
Page 1 of 5
Uinta Wax Operating, LLC
RD West Pad
Uintah County, UT
Caterpillar G3406TA SN: 4FD01331
Test Date: 8/6/24
O2 NOX CO TVOC
20.01 507.5 1188.0 854.3
10.170 250.2 494.0 301.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
10.2 248.2 492.2 298.6
Linearity Bias (Zero) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Linearity Bias (Span) 10.3 251.4 492.5 299.1
% (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.17 250.2 494.0 301.6
20.01 507.5 1188.0 501.6
854.3
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
10.3 251.4 492.5 299.1
20.1 507.2 1189.0 495.7
847.4
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
0.1 1.2 1.5 -0.3
0.1 0.3 1.0 -2.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.50% 0.63% 0.03% 0.06%
0.65% 0.24% 0.13% 0.39%
Gas Concentration
1
2
3
Linearity Information
Gas
Span Gas Value/Range
Bias Gas Value
4
Difference
1
4
Response
1
2
Span Bias
Max Calibration Error
Bias Check (Zero)
Bias Check (Span)
2
3
4
Results
3
Zero Bias
Page 2 of 5
Uinta Wax Operating, LLC Run 1
RD West Pad
Uintah County, UT Start Time 7:55
Caterpillar G3406TA SN: 4FD01331 Run Length 60
Test Date: 8/6/24 Stop Time 8:55
O2 NOX CO TVOC
20.0 507.5 1188 854
10.17 250.2 494.0 301.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
10.2 248.2 492.2 298.6
0.0 0.4 0.2 0.3
10.0 252.8 490.4 295.5
0.0%0.1%0.0%0.0%
1.5%0.3%0.2%0.4%
0.0%0.1%0.0%0.0%
1.0%0.9%0.2%0.4%
Corrected O2 % Corrected NOX ppm Corrected CO ppm Corrected TVOC ppm
0.0 0.0 301.7 44.9
Run Length
(Minutes) Uncorrected O2 % Uncorrected NOX ppm Uncorrected CO ppm Uncorrected TVOC
ppm
60 0.0 0.3 300.1 44.5
Zero%
Span%
Absolute Bias (Zero)
Absolute Bias (Span)
Absolute Drift (Zero)
Absolute Drift (Span)
Results
Post Test Calibration
Calibration Information
Instrument Range
Span Gas Value
Gas
Calibration
Pretest Calibration
Zero%
Span%
Page 3 of 5
Uinta Wax Operating, LLC Run 2
RD West Pad
Uintah County, UT Start Time 9:21
Caterpillar G3406TA SN: 4FD01331 Run Length 60
Test Date: 8/6/24 Stop Time 10:21
O2 NOX CO TVOC
20.0 508 1188 854
10.17 250.2 494.0 301.6
0.0 0.4 0.2 0.3
10.0 252.8 490.4 295.5
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.0 250.0 493.0 300.0
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
1.5%0.3%0.0%0.1%
0.0%0.1%0.0%0.0%
0.0%0.6%0.2%0.5%
Corrected O2 % Corrected NOX ppm Corrected CO ppm Corrected TVOC ppm
0.0 0.1 292.1 43.8
Run Length
(Minutes) Uncorrected O2 % Uncorrected NOX ppm Uncorrected CO ppm Uncorrected TVOC
ppm
60 0.0 0.3 290.8 43.4
Gas
Instrument Range
Post Test Calibration
Zero%
Span Gas Value
Calibration
Pretest Calibration
Zero%
Calibration Information
Results
Absolute Bias (Zero)
Absolute Bias (Span)
Absolute Drift (Zero)
Absolute Drift (Span)
Span%
Span%
Page 4 of 5
Uinta Wax Operating, LLC Run 3
RD West Pad
Uintah County, UT Start Time 10:42
Caterpillar G3406TA SN: 4FD01331 Run Length 60
Test Date: 8/6/24 Stop Time 11:42
O2 NOX CO TVOC
20.0 508 1188 854
10.17 250.2 494.0 301.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.0 250.0 493.0 300.0
0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4
10.0 250.8 492.9 300.7
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
1.5%0.1%0.0%0.2%
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
0.0%0.2%0.0%0.1%
Corrected O2 % Corrected NOX ppm Corrected CO ppm Corrected TVOC ppm
0.0 0.0 293.2 25.0
Run Length
(Minutes) Uncorrected O2 % Uncorrected NOX ppm Uncorrected CO ppm Uncorrected TVOC
ppm
60 0.0 0.1 292.7 25.1
Post Test Calibration
Instrument Range
Zero%
Results
Absolute Bias (Zero)
Span%
Span%
Zero%
Absolute Bias (Span)
Absolute Drift (Zero)
Absolute Drift (Span)
Calibration Information
Span Gas Value
Calibration
Pretest Calibration
Gas
Page 5 of 5

UDEQ
Source Test Report

Uinta Wax Operating, LLC
RD Tribal 8N, 17S, 7N Production Facility
Uintah County, Utah

August 6, 2024

Utah Administrative Code Rule R307-510-4
Engine: Caterpillar G3406TA
SN: 4FD01331

Prepared By:

Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.
2730 Commercial Way
Rock Springs, WY 82901

September 9, 2024

Ms. Karen Pratt
Uinta Wax Operating, LLC

Dear Ms. Pratt:

Re: Engine Emission Testing For Uinta Wax Operating, LLC, RD Tribal 8N, 17S,
7N Production Facility, Utah Administrative Code Rule R307-510-4.

Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc. was requested to perform an engine emission test on a
Caterpillar G3406TA rich burn engine located in Uintah County, Utah. Testing was
conducted in accordance with the Utah Administrative Code Rule R307-510-4.

Utah Administrative Code Rule R307-510-4 Emission Levels

The average recorded levels were found to comply with emission levels stipulated by Utah
Administrative Code Rule R307-510-4, as shown in the attached report and summarized
below.
*Please note: VOC levels are reported as NMHC through the use of a Methane Cutter as previously described in
the testing protocol.

Catalyst Parameters (Averaged Over 3 Test Runs)

Inlet Temp (deg F) DP (in H2O)
989 1.1

Engine Load (Averaged Over 3 Test Runs)

BHP % Load
178.1 54.8

Testing Protocol

The attached report was generated using standard CEMS equipment and methodologies as
required by EPA 40 CFR 60(A) Methods 3A, 4, 7E, 10, 19 & 25A.

Emission
Unit
Avg
NOx
NOx
Standard
Avg
CO
CO
Standard
Avg
NMHC*
VOC
Standard
g/bhp-hr 0.00 1.0 0.80 2.0 0.22 0.7

Quality Assurance

Oasis has performed a full review of the raw data and calculated results in this report. Any
errors we have encountered have been listed in the body of this report. After performing the
review, we are confident that this engine has met the requirements of Utah Administrative
Code Rule R307-510-4.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact the undersigned at
[phone].

Yours truly,
Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.

_______________________ _________________________
Cember Crawley Charles A. Chapman
Environmental Scientist Manager of Technical Services

_________________________

Christopher N. Knott, P.Eng.
Director, Engineering & Operations

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.1 INTRODUCTION

2.1 EQUIPMENT UTILIZATION

3.1 DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS
3.1.1 SOURCE TEST 1 (NOx, CO & NMHC)
3.1.2 SOURCE TEST 2 (NOx, CO & NMHC)
3.1.3 SOURCE TEST 3 (NOx, CO & NMHC)

4.1 STACK SAMPLING LOCATION

4.2 STACK SAMPLING METHODS & PROCEDURES

5.1 LOAD APPROXIMATION

6.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE

APPENDIX A: NOx, CO & NMHC TESTS

APPENDIX B: QUALITY ASSURANCE/CALIBRATION DATA

APPENDIX C: LOAD APPROXIMATION

APPENDIX D: METHOD 19 CALCULATIONS

APPENDIX E: FIELD NOTES

SOURCE EMISSION TEST REPORT

Utah Administrative Code Rule R307-510-4

Test Performed By: Oasis Emission Consultants, Inc.

Facility Name: RD Tribal 8N, 17S, 7N Production
Facility

Emission Source: Caterpillar G3406TA

Date of Test: August 6, 2024

Date of Report: September 9, 2024

1.1 Introduction

The purpose of this source test was to demonstrate that source emissions from a Caterpillar
G3406TA engine were below maximum allowable levels specified by Utah Administrative
Code Rule R307-510-4.

The Caterpillar G3406TA engine is a rich burn engine that employs an NSCR Catalytic
Convertor to regulate emission levels.

Three test runs were performed on August 6, 2024 to analyze NOx, CO & VOC emission
levels according to methodologies outlined in the EPA 40 CFR 60(A) Protocol. Each of the
three runs consisted of sixty (60) readings taken at one (1) minute intervals.

Test runs were observed by the following individuals:

 Brandon Mead, OEC
 Jake, ArchRock

2.1 Equipment Utilization

The following equipment was used during the tests performed at the RD Tribal 8N, 17S, 7N
Production Facility in conjunction with procedures outlined in our standard testing protocol
according to EPA Reference Methods 3A, 4, 7E, 10, 19 & 25A.

 API 300M CO NDIR Analyzer, S/N 71, Range 0-3000 ppm
 API 200AH NOx/O2 Chemiluminescent/Paramagnetic Analyzer, S/N 495,
Range 0-5000 ppm
 CAI 600HFID Analyzer, c/w Methane Cutter
 Universal Analyzer 3040SSP Sample Gas Conditioner
 Method 4 Impinger System c/w Ice Box Tray
 75 ft. Heated Sample Line
 APEX MC-170 Meter Box
 EPA G1 Protocol Calibration Gas
 Laptop Computer to download Raw Analyzer Data

3.1 Discussion of NOx, CO & NMHC Test Results

Please refer to the Appendices for a listing of all raw data, calibration error response and
calculations performed per EPA 40 CFR 60(A) requirements. Each test run was performed at
the maximum achievable load. Overall the average emission levels complied with permitted
requirements. Testing for NOx, CO & NMHC were run concurrently with one another.

3.1.1 Source Test 1: Caterpillar G3406TA, NOx, CO & NMHC

The first test was performed from 7:55 to 8:54 for NOx, CO & NMHC.

Based on the approximated load of 177.1 bhp, the average NOx and CO levels were
found to be 0.00 g/bhp-hr and 0.82 g/bhp-hr respectively, below limitations. The
NMHC level (derived from THC and CH4 measured by the analyzer) tested at
0.27 g/bhp-hr, which tested in compliance with the standards.

Test
Run
NOx
(ppm)
NOx
(g/bhp-hr)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(ppm)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(lbs/hr)
NMHC
(ppm)
NMHC
(g/bhp-hr)
NMHC
(lbs/hr)
O2
(%)
1 0.05 0.00 0.00 301.70 0.82 0.32 64.73 0.27 0.11 0.0

3.1.2 Source Test 2: Caterpillar G3406TA, NOx, CO & NMHC

The second test was performed from 9:21 to 10:20 for NOx, CO & NMHC.

Based on the approximated load of 179.4 bhp, the average NOx and CO levels were
found to be 0.00 g/bhp-hr and 0.79 g/bhp-hr respectively, below limitations. The
NMHC level (derived from THC and CH4 measured by the analyzer) tested at
0.26 g/bhp-hr, which tested in compliance with the standards.

Test
Run
NOx
(ppm)
NOx
(g/bhp-hr)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(ppm)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(lbs/hr)
NMHC
(ppm)
NMHC
(g/bhp-hr)
NMHC
(lbs/hr)
O2
(%)
2 0.08 0.00 0.00 292.14 0.79 0.31 61.70 0.26 0.10 0.0

3.1.3 Source Test 3: Caterpillar G3406TA, NOx, CO & NMHC

The third test was performed from 10:42 to 11:41 for NOx, CO & NMHC.

Based on the approximated load of 177.8 bhp, the average NOx and CO levels were
found to be 0.00 g/bhp-hr and 0.79 g/bhp-hr respectively, below limitations. The
NMHC level (derived from THC and CH4 measured by the analyzer) tested at
0.12 g/bhp-hr, which tested in compliance with the standards.

Test
Run
NOx
(ppm)
NOx
(g/bhp-hr)
NOx
(lbs/hr)
CO
(ppm)
CO
(g/bhp-hr)
CO
(lbs/hr)
NMHC
(ppm)
NMHC
(g/bhp-hr)
NMHC
(lbs/hr)
O2
(%)
3 0.10 0.00 0.00 293.19 0.79 0.31 29.29 0.12 0.05 0.0

4.1 Stack Sampling Location

The sampling for moisture, flow, NOx, CO & NMHC measurements was conducted at the
end of the stack due to the lack of Method 1 sample ports.

4.2 Stack Sampling Methods & Procedures

Testing followed EPA 40 CFR 60(A) methodologies per our standard protocol, with no
exceptions.

5.1 Engine Load Approximation

The engine load was approximated by using the load percentage reading obtained from the
engine display panel.

6.1 Quality Assurance

All pre and post calibration error checks, leak checks, and other quality assurance issues
conformed with the requirements specified in EPA 40 CFR 60(A), Methods 3A, 4, 7E, 10 &
25A.

 Due to technical difficulties, the post run calibration data for the second test run was
not digitally recorded. The compliance specialist manually recorded the system
responses.

APPENDIX A

Test Run 1
date_and_time co (ppm)nox (ppm)voc (ppm)o2 (%)
8/6/2024 7:55 241.8 0.3 51.6 0.5
8/6/2024 7:56 427.9 0.3 52.5 0
8/6/2024 7:57 253.7 0.3 55.5 0
8/6/2024 7:58 217.9 0.3 59.1 0
8/6/2024 7:59 215.9 0.3 54.9 0
8/6/2024 8:00 323.2 0.3 56.4 0
8/6/2024 8:01 189.3 0.3 54.3 0
8/6/2024 8:02 233.4 0.3 52.5 0
8/6/2024 8:03 345.7 0.3 54.3 0
8/6/2024 8:04 368.1 0.3 69.6 0
8/6/2024 8:05 213.8 0.3 55.2 0
8/6/2024 8:06 391.1 0.3 41.4 0
8/6/2024 8:07 407.1 0.3 33.3 0
8/6/2024 8:08 324.8 0.3 64.5 0
8/6/2024 8:09 325 0.3 39.6 0
8/6/2024 8:10 184.1 0.3 63 0
8/6/2024 8:11 351.2 0.3 57.9 0
8/6/2024 8:12 335.9 0.3 45.9 0
8/6/2024 8:13 464.5 0.3 71.8 0
8/6/2024 8:14 524.7 0.3 62.7 0
8/6/2024 8:15 179.7 0.3 45.9 0
8/6/2024 8:16 303.2 0.3 47.1 0
8/6/2024 8:17 798.9 0.3 17.7 0
8/6/2024 8:18 214.5 0.3 68.2 0
8/6/2024 8:19 202.8 0 54 0
8/6/2024 8:20 248.3 0.3 26.4 0
8/6/2024 8:21 214.1 0.3 64.3 0
8/6/2024 8:22 203 0.2 46.2 0
8/6/2024 8:23 279.5 0.3 62.2 0
8/6/2024 8:24 316 0.3 66.4 0
8/6/2024 8:25 243 0.3 54.7 0
8/6/2024 8:26 344.1 0.4 34.2 0
8/6/2024 8:27 207.5 0.3 40.3 0
8/6/2024 8:28 215.4 0.4 46 0
8/6/2024 8:29 216 0.3 51.1 0
8/6/2024 8:30 269.6 0.2 42.6 0
8/6/2024 8:31 308.5 0.3 16.5 0
8/6/2024 8:32 419.1 0.3 24.6 0
8/6/2024 8:33 221.3 0.3 25.8 0
8/6/2024 8:34 321.4 0.4 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:35 303.8 0.3 28.8 0
8/6/2024 8:36 208.9 0.3 25 0
8/6/2024 8:37 335.2 0.4 30 0
8/6/2024 8:38 382.9 0.3 34.5 0
8/6/2024 8:39 221.1 0.3 28.5 0
8/6/2024 8:40 310.4 0.4 19.8 0
8/6/2024 8:41 168.9 0.3 27.3 0
8/6/2024 8:42 244.6 0.4 17.1 0
8/6/2024 8:43 316.3 0.3 34 0
8/6/2024 8:44 263.8 0.3 33.3 0
8/6/2024 8:45 222.9 0.4 34.6 0
8/6/2024 8:46 232.2 0.4 67.9 0
8/6/2024 8:47 325.3 0.3 52.9 0
8/6/2024 8:48 279.5 0.4 47.8 0
8/6/2024 8:49 398.8 0.4 42.7 0
8/6/2024 8:50 347.6 0.2 40.9 0
8/6/2024 8:51 330.3 0.3 28.2 0
8/6/2024 8:52 459.8 0.3 50.8 0
8/6/2024 8:53 392.9 0.2 51.1 0
8/6/2024 8:54 197.6 0.3 45.1 0
AVG 300.1 0.3 44.5 0.0
AVG Corrected 301.7 0.1 64.7 0.0
RD Tribal 8N, 17S, 7N Production Facility
Graphical Analysis of Test Run 1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
PP
M
v

Readings

Source Test 1
CO
NOx
NMHC
Test Run 2
date_and_time co (ppm)nox (ppm)voc (ppm)o2 (%)
8/6/2024 9:21 282.2 0.3 19.8 0
8/6/2024 9:22 253.9 0.2 37.3 0
8/6/2024 9:23 353.8 0.4 23.4 0
8/6/2024 9:24 255.2 0.3 72.4 0
8/6/2024 9:25 446 0.3 60.4 0
8/6/2024 9:26 242.7 0.3 41.8 0
8/6/2024 9:27 232.8 0.4 39.7 0
8/6/2024 9:28 238.5 0.4 45.1 0
8/6/2024 9:29 339.2 0.4 43.6 0
8/6/2024 9:30 224 0.3 44.5 0
8/6/2024 9:31 221.3 0.3 40.9 0
8/6/2024 9:32 381.8 0.3 27.6 0
8/6/2024 9:33 438.5 0.4 40.3 0
8/6/2024 9:34 185 0.4 54.1 0
8/6/2024 9:35 286.1 0.3 27 0
8/6/2024 9:36 229.7 0.4 48.7 0
8/6/2024 9:37 264.4 0.3 37.6 0
8/6/2024 9:38 237.6 0.4 55 0
8/6/2024 9:39 229.6 0.4 55 0
8/6/2024 9:40 260.7 0.3 43.6 0
8/6/2024 9:41 440.8 0.3 73.6 0
8/6/2024 9:42 199.4 0.2 40.6 0
8/6/2024 9:43 280 0.3 53.8 0
8/6/2024 9:44 255.5 0.3 43.9 0
8/6/2024 9:45 358.2 0.3 66.4 0
8/6/2024 9:46 278.7 0.2 52.9 0
8/6/2024 9:47 169.3 0 43 0
8/6/2024 9:48 231.6 0.3 67.3 0
8/6/2024 9:49 213.8 0.3 66.4 0
8/6/2024 9:50 365.1 0.1 24.9 0
8/6/2024 9:51 237.8 0.2 27.9 0
8/6/2024 9:52 325 0.3 67.3 0
8/6/2024 9:53 341.9 0.3 39.3 0
8/6/2024 9:54 278.4 0.3 70 0
8/6/2024 9:55 285 0.2 22.5 0
8/6/2024 9:56 174.7 0.1 65.5 0
8/6/2024 9:57 274.8 0.3 45.7 0
8/6/2024 9:58 372.9 0.2 32.4 0
8/6/2024 9:59 199.9 0 54.4 0
8/6/2024 10:00 277.6 0.3 42.7 0
8/6/2024 10:01 346.9 0.2 41.2 0
8/6/2024 10:02 158.4 0.3 50.5 0
8/6/2024 10:03 298.9 0.3 39.6 0
8/6/2024 10:04 501.3 0.3 0.3 0
8/6/2024 10:05 320.5 0.3 39.7 0
8/6/2024 10:06 182.4 0.3 72.4 0
8/6/2024 10:07 308.1 0.3 40.8 0
8/6/2024 10:08 303.7 0.3 23.1 0
8/6/2024 10:09 277.1 0.3 53.2 0
8/6/2024 10:10 302 0.2 43.5 0
8/6/2024 10:11 218.3 0.3 33.6 0
8/6/2024 10:12 212.1 0.2 58.3 0
8/6/2024 10:13 356.6 0.2 29.1 0
8/6/2024 10:14 386 0.2 12.6 0
8/6/2024 10:15 358.6 0.3 0.3 0
8/6/2024 10:16 170.9 0.3 57.1 0
8/6/2024 10:17 317.5 0.3 50.5 0
8/6/2024 10:18 479.8 0.3 12.3 0
8/6/2024 10:19 449.3 0.3 41.5 0
8/6/2024 10:20 337.4 0.3 46.5 0
AVG 290.8 0.3 43.4 0.0
AVG Corrected 292.1 0.1 61.7 0.0
RD Tribal 8N, 17S, 7N Production Facility
Graphical Analysis of Test Run 2
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
PP
M
v

Readings

Source Test 2
CO
NOx
NMHC
Test Run 3
date_and_time co (ppm)nox (ppm)voc (ppm)o2 (%)
8/6/2024 10:42 292.6 0.1 13.5 0
8/6/2024 10:43 300.9 0 24.9 0
8/6/2024 10:44 250.1 0.1 31.8 0
8/6/2024 10:45 218 0 32.1 0
8/6/2024 10:46 226.9 0.1 29.7 0
8/6/2024 10:47 438.7 0.1 28.8 0
8/6/2024 10:48 303.1 0 33.3 0
8/6/2024 10:49 214.8 0.1 35.7 0
8/6/2024 10:50 245.7 0.1 17.4 0
8/6/2024 10:51 367.5 0.1 32.4 0
8/6/2024 10:52 255.8 0.1 28.5 0
8/6/2024 10:53 231.7 0 42 0
8/6/2024 10:54 339.5 0.2 9.6 0
8/6/2024 10:55 265.3 0 34.5 0
8/6/2024 10:56 258.2 0.1 9.6 0
8/6/2024 10:57 285 0.1 25.5 0
8/6/2024 10:58 280.2 0.4 42.6 0
8/6/2024 10:59 249.4 0.1 42.9 0
8/6/2024 11:00 246 0.1 18.8 0
8/6/2024 11:01 348.6 0.1 16.4 0
8/6/2024 11:02 247.5 0.2 53.1 0
8/6/2024 11:03 313.9 0.1 47.7 0
8/6/2024 11:04 311.3 0.1 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:05 256.4 0.1 22.4 0
8/6/2024 11:06 460.4 0.2 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:07 355 0.1 11.6 0
8/6/2024 11:08 412.3 0.1 47.6 0
8/6/2024 11:09 226.6 0.1 27.5 0
8/6/2024 11:10 181.4 0.1 34.7 0
8/6/2024 11:11 237.2 0.2 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:12 217.9 0.4 24.2 0
8/6/2024 11:13 286.7 0.2 45.8 0
8/6/2024 11:14 241.9 0.1 19.4 0
8/6/2024 11:15 241.5 0.1 47.3 0
8/6/2024 11:16 274.1 0.1 32.9 0
8/6/2024 11:17 540.4 0.2 46.7 0
8/6/2024 11:18 203.2 0.1 40.4 0
8/6/2024 11:19 196.6 0.2 29 0
8/6/2024 11:20 220.6 0.2 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:21 251.1 0.2 1.6 0
8/6/2024 11:22 276.6 0.3 26.6 0
8/6/2024 11:23 268.7 0.2 38.3 0
8/6/2024 11:24 324.5 0.1 49.4 0
8/6/2024 11:25 213.3 0.1 48.4 0
8/6/2024 11:26 261.4 0.2 0.5 0
8/6/2024 11:27 386.9 0.2 41 0
8/6/2024 11:28 323.1 0.3 22 0
8/6/2024 11:29 219.1 0.2 17.3 0
8/6/2024 11:30 298.8 0.2 10.6 0
8/6/2024 11:31 517 0.2 30.4 0
8/6/2024 11:32 352.7 0.2 4.6 0
8/6/2024 11:33 196.3 0.2 7.3 0
8/6/2024 11:34 269.1 0.2 3.1 0
8/6/2024 11:35 349.2 0.1 18.5 0
8/6/2024 11:36 333.7 0.2 29.8 0
8/6/2024 11:37 278 0.3 14.6 0
8/6/2024 11:38 288.2 0.1 11.6 0
8/6/2024 11:39 269.1 0.1 23.3 0
8/6/2024 11:40 442.5 0.2 15.2 0
8/6/2024 11:41 396.9 0.2 7.1 0
AVG 292.7 0.1 25.1 0.0
AVG Corrected 293.2 0.1 29.3 0.0
RD Tribal 8N, 17S, 7N Production Facility
Graphical Analysis of Test Run 3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
PP
M
v

Readings

Source Test 3
CO
NOx
NMHC

APPENDIX B

Compound Calibration Gas Level Analyzer Response % Error
NOx Zero (ppm):0.0 0.1 0.02
NOx Mid (ppm):250.2 251.4 0.24
NOx Upscale (ppm):507.5 507.2 0.06
NOx Span Used (ppm):250.2 251.4
CO Zero (ppm):0.0 0.2 0.02
CO Mid (ppm):494.0 492.5 0.13
CO Upscale (ppm):1188.0 1189.0 0.08
CO Span Used (ppm):494.0 492.5
VOC Zero (ppm):0.0 0.3 0.04
VOC Low (ppm):301.6 299.1 0.29
VOC Mid (ppm):501.6 495.7 0.69
VOC Upscale (ppm):854.3 847.4 0.81
VOC Span Used (ppm):301.6 299.1
O2 Zero (%):0.0 0.0 0.00
O2 Mid (%):10.17 10.3 0.65
O2 Upscale (%):20.01 20.1 0.45
O2 Span Used (%):10.17 10.3
Compound Analyzer Response System Bias Response % Cal Error
NOx Zero (ppm)0.1 0.1 0.00
NOx Span (ppm)251.4 248.2 0.63
CO Zero (ppm)0.2 0.2 0.00
CO Span (ppm)492.5 492.2 0.03
VOC Zero (ppm)0.3 0.3 0.00
VOC Span (ppm)299.1 298.6 0.06
O2 Zero (%)0.0 0.0 0.00
O2 Span (%)10.3 10.2 0.50
Compound Analyzer Response System Bias Response % Cal Error % Zero Drift Error % Cal Drift Error
NOx Zero (ppm)0.1 0.4 0.06 0.06
NOx Span (ppm)251.4 252.8 0.28 0.91
CO Zero (ppm)0.2 0.2 0.00 0.00
CO Span (ppm)492.5 490.4 0.18 0.15
VOC Zero (ppm)0.3 0.3 0.00 0.00
VOC Span (ppm)299.1 295.5 0.42 0.36
O2 Zero (%)0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
O2 Span (%)10.3 10.0 1.50 1.00
Compound Analyzer Response System Bias Response % Cal Error % Zero Drift Error % Cal Drift Error
NOx Zero (ppm)0.1 0.0 0.02 0.08
NOx Span (ppm)251.4 250.0 0.28 0.55
CO Zero (ppm)0.2 0.0 0.02 0.02
CO Span (ppm)492.5 493.0 0.04 0.22
VOC Zero (ppm)0.3 0.0 0.04 0.04
VOC Span (ppm)299.1 300.0 0.11 0.53
O2 Zero (%)0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
O2 Span (%)10.3 10.0 1.45 0.05
Compound Analyzer Response System Bias Response % Cal Error % Zero Drift Error % Cal Drift Error
NOx Zero (ppm)0.1 0.1 0.00 0.02
NOx Span (ppm)251.4 250.8 0.12 0.16
CO Zero (ppm)0.2 0.4 0.02 0.03
CO Span (ppm)492.5 492.9 0.03 0.01
VOC Zero (ppm)0.3 0.4 0.01 0.05
VOC Span (ppm)299.1 300.7 0.19 0.08
O2 Zero (%)0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
O2 Span (%)10.3 10.0 1.50 0.05
Calibration Summary Tables
LINEARITY
PRE CAL 1
POST CAL 1
POST CAL 2
POST CAL 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
Part Number:E02NI99E15A3614 Reference Number:153-401765377-1
Cylinder Number:CC734184 Cylinder Volume:144.4 CF
Laboratory:124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT Cylinder Pressure:2015 PSIG
PGVP Number:B72020 Valve Outlet:660
Gas Code:NO,NOX,BALN Certification Date:Mar 27, 2020
Expiration Date:Mar 27, 2028
Certification performed in accordance with “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)” document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative Assay
Concentration Concentration Method Uncertainty Dates
NOX 250.0 PPM 250.2 PPM G1 +/- 0.7% NIST Traceable 03/20/2020, 03/27/2020
NITRIC OXIDE 250.0 PPM 250.1 PPM G1 +/- 0.6% NIST Traceable 03/20/2020, 03/27/2020
NITROGEN Balance
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 18060132 KAL004328 249.9 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN 0.4%Nov 08, 2023
PRM 12376 D562879 10.01 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.0%Aug 17, 2018
NTRM 18060122 KAL004218 249.9 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN 0.4%Nov 08, 2023
GMIS 7302017111 CC511391 4.634 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.0%Aug 15, 2021
The SRM, NTRM, PRM, or RGM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assay and not part of the analysis.
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet 6700 AMP0900119 NO MNO FTIR Mar 18, 2020
Nicolet 6700 AMP0900119 NO2 impurity FTIR NO2 impurity Mar 19, 2020
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele, UT 84074
Airgas.com
Signature on file
Approved for Release Page 1 of 1
Airgas
an Air Liquide company
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele,UT 84074
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product:EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
E02N199E15A0919
EB0147308
124 Tooele (SAP)-UT
B72022
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
153-402459424-1
144,0 CF
2015 PSIG
660
Jun 17,2022
Expiration Date:Jun 17 2030
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)"documentEPA600/R-12/531 ,using the assay procedures listed,Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference.This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%.There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture.All concentrations are on amole/mole basis unless otherwise noted.
DO Not Use This C linder below 100 si ,i.e.0.7 me a ascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTSComponent
NOX
NITRIC OXIDE
NITROGEN
Requested
Concentration
500.0 PPM
500.0 PPM
Balance
Actual
Concentration
507.5 PPM
507,4
Protocol
Method
Total Relative
Uncertainty
+/-0.6%NIST Traceable
+/-0.6%NIST Traceable
Type
NTRM
GMIS
Lot ID
15010105
12395
1534002020104
Cylinder No
KAL003266
D887660
EB0130055
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Concentration
494.6 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN
9.91 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR
4.81 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
Uncertainty
0.5%
2.0%
2.0%
Assay
Dates
06/10/2022,06/17/2022
06/10/2022,06/17/2022
Expiration Date
Aug 16,2027
Feb 02,2022
Apr 30,2024TheSRM, PRM or RGM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assay and not part of the analysis.
Instrument/Make/Model
Nicolet iS50 AUP2010228 NO MNO
Nicolet iS50 AUP2010228 N02 impurity
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Approv
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle
FTIR N02 impurity
for Relea
Last Multipoint Calibration
Jun 01,2022
Jun 02,2022
5
Page I ofl
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
Part Number:E03NI80E15A0138 Reference Number:153-402897797-1
Cylinder Number:CC744553 Cylinder Volume:141.0 CF
Laboratory:124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT Cylinder Pressure:2015 PSIG
PGVP Number:B72023 Valve Outlet:590
Gas Code:CO2,O2,BALN Certification Date:Nov 20, 2023
Expiration Date:Nov 20, 2031
Certification performed in accordance with “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)” document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative Assay
Concentration Concentration Method Uncertainty Dates
CARBON DIOXIDE 10.00 %9.854 %G1 +/- 1.2% NIST Traceable 11/20/2023
OXYGEN 10.00 %10.17 %G1 +/- 0.8% NIST Traceable 11/20/2023
NITROGEN Balance
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 13060411 CC413537 7.489 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 0.6%May 14, 2025
NTRM 98051010 SG9161286BAL 12.05 % OXYGEN/NITROGEN 0.7%Dec 14, 2023
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Horiba VIA-510 SV4MEUTJ CO2 CO2 NDIR (Dixon)Nov 15, 2023
Horiba MPA-510 W603MM58 O2 O2 Paramagnetic (DIXON)Nov 15, 2023
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele, UT 84074
Airgas.com
Signature on file
Approved for Release Page 1 of 1
Airgas
an Air Liquide company
Pan Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
Airgas Specialty
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele,UT 84074
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product:EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
E03N160E15A0286
CC504245
124 -Tooele (SAP)-UT
872023
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
153-402803016-1
159.6 CF
2015 PSIG
590
Jul 25,2023
Expiration Date:Jul 25 2031
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certificationof Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)"document EPA
600/R-12/531 ,using the assay procedures listed.Analytical Methodology dæs not require correction for analytical interference.This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%.There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture.All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted.The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not except in full without approval of the laboratory.Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e.0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component
CARBON DIOXIDE
OXYGEN
Requested
Concentration
20.00 %
20.00 %
Balance
Cylinder No
CC415397
CC282492
Actual
Concentration
19.74 %
20.01 %
Protocol
Method
Gl
Gl
NITROGEN
Type
NTRM
NTRM
Lot ID
13060802
09061434
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Concentration
24.04 %CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
22.53 %OXYGEN/NITROGEN
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle
C02 NDIR (Dixon)
02 Paramagnetic (DIXON)
Total Relative
Uncertainty
+1-0.9%NIST Traceable
+1-0.5%NIST Traceable
Uncertainty
0.6%
0.4%
Assay
Dates
07/25/2023
07/25/2023
Expiration Date
Dec 11,2025
May 13,2025
Instrument/Make/ModeI
Horiba VIA-510 SV4MEUTJ C02
Horiba MPA-510 W603MM58 02
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Last Muitipoint Calibration
Jun 28,2023
Jun 29,2023
Approved for Relea Page 1 of 1
an AirLiquide company
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele,UT 84074
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product:EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
E02N199E15A0681
CC342074
124 -Tooele (SAP)-UT
B72022
BALN
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume.
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
153-402591820-1
144.0 CF
2015 PSIG
350
Nov 15,2022
Expiration Date:Nov 15 2030
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)"document EPA
600/R-12/531.using the assay procedures listed.Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference.This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%.There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture,All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted.The results relate only to the items tested.The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory,Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig,i.e.0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component
PROPANE
NITROGEN
Type
NTRM
Requested
Concentration
Actual
Concentration
301.6 PPM
Protocol
Method
Gl
Total Relative
Uncertainty
+1-0.7%NIST Traceable300.0 PPM
Balance
Lot ID
12010923
Cylinder No
ND46382
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Concentration
487 pROPANE/AlR
Uncertainty
0.6%
Assay
Dates
1 1/15/2022
Expiration Date
Apr 24,2024
Instrument/Make/ModeI
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 C3H8 MC3H8
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Approve
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle
FTIR
for Rele se
Last Multipoint Calibration
Oct 27,2022
Page I of 1
an Air Liquide company
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele,UT 84074
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product:EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
E02A199E15A0332
EB0157369
124 -Tooele (SAP)-UT
B72023
PPN,BALA
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
153-402746983-1
146.0 CF
2015 PSIG
590
May 19,2023
Expiration Date:Ma 19 2031
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)"document EPA
600/R-12/531 ,using the assay procedures listed.Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference.This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%,There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture.All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted.The results relate only to the items tested.The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory.Do
Not use This Cylinder below 100 psig,i.e.0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component
PROPANE
AIR
Type
NTRM
Requested
Concentration
Actual
Concentration
501.6 PPM
Protocol
Method
Gl
Total Relative
Uncertainty
+1-0.0%N!ST500.0 PPM
Balance
Lot ID
i 2010923
Cylinder No
ND46382
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Concentration
487 PFM PROFANE/AIR
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENTAnalyticalPrinciple
FTI R
Uncertainty
0.6%
Assay
05/19/2023
Expiration Date
Apr 24,2024
Instrument/Make/Model
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 C3H8 MC3H8
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Last Multipoint Calibration
May 03,2023
A pr ved or Release Page 1 ofl
Airgas
an Air Liquide company
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product:EPA Protocol
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
E02A199E15A0333
XC031607B
124 -Tooele (SAP)-UT
872019
p p N,BALA
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA,LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele,UT 84074
Airgas.com
153-401387048-1
146.3 CF
2015 PSIG
590
Jan 02,2019
Expiration Date:Jan 02 2027
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)"document EPA
600/R-12/531 ,using the assay procedures listed.Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference.This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%.There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture.All concentrations are on a
volume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.
DO Not Use This C linder below 100 si i.e.0.7 me a ascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component
PROPANE
AIR
Ty pe
NTRM
Requested
Concentration
850.0 PPM
Balance
Actual
Concentration
854.3 PPM
Protocol
Method
Gl
Total Relative
Uncertainty
+/-0.8%NIST Traceable
Lot ID
15060815
Cylinder No
CC462626
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Concentration
992.3 PPM PROPANE/NITROGEN
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENTAnalyticalPrinciple
FTIR
Uncertainty
0.6%
Assay
Dates
01/02/2019
Expiration Date
Jul 22,2021
Instrument/Make/ModeI
Nicolet 6700 AMP0900119 C3H8 MC3H8
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Approved for Release
Last Multipoint Calibration
Dec 27,2018
Page 1 of 153401387048-1
APEX INSTRUMENTS METHOD 5 POST-TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION

USING CALIBRATED CRITICAL ORIFICES

3·POINT ENGLISH UNITS

522-T/7
1007019
s-10
323304
1For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 in. Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above.
74
74
74
15
17
18
4.123
4.111
4.168
0.589
0.457
0.347
4.395
4.218
4.339
0.628
0.469
0.362
1.066
1.026
1.041
CEMS Monthly Validation Checks August 2024 T6.xlsx
Meter Censele Information
s-110-234707xls
Certificate of Calibration
METHOD 5 PRE-TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION
Factors/CQnversions
DGM Model
DGM Serial
5,
INSTRUMENTS
-6.0
Calibration Conditiong fe nce ui me t
W-NK-D-5B WTM Serial:s-110
234707
so.é2
-0.66
æo-45
€0,2S
Bar.Pressure (in-Hg):
Ambient Temp (OF):
Relative Humidity (%):
Altitude (t):
Altitude Correction Factor (in):
Corrected Bar.Pressure (in Hg):
30.21
76.0
58
414.0
-0.414
29.80
Std Temp (R):
Std Press (in Hg):
Ki (Riin Hg):
527.67
29.92
17.636
WTM Model:
WTM Cal.Due Date:
WTM Thermometer:
25-Nov-19
Hg
Test Meter (DGM)Reference Meter
29.830
41
Gamma:
25
23,6
546258
0.9999
231B
75.2
Calibration ResulE
7612
iio
•a.9ig
0539
646.12b*
_153f3.050_
45155±0
.43131650:
146é:S10
172830
5.2eo_
Standardized Data
5.483.
'51405
-Oä@3
0.54b
13
•6.390
-Våiue.
li0'.gei2r%
j0J996g
a.9974
CAY)
=y Avg.
The instruments listed and described On this certificate have been calibrated against standards traceable totheNatian21 1 of Standards and Tæhnology (N-I.S.T-)-
Technician:Eric Waters Signature:
Note:For Calibration Factor Y.the ratio readingcfthe calibration meter to
the dry gas meter,acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is
0_02.
Pass/Fai1 Result:
Date:November 8,2019
Methane Response Factor And Non-Methane Cutter Penetration Factor Determination
1065.360 (d)1-10 CH4 Response Factor Determination for FID
1.C3H8 Span Gas Value (As C1)=1506.00
2.CH4 Span Gas Value =513.00
3.Insure Analyzer Flow/Pressure/Temps Ok yes Pass
4.Insure FID Analyzer Calibrated using C3H8 to C1 Value yes Pass
5.Zero FID Analyzer Zero=0.00
6.Span FID Analyzer with C3H8 Gas Listed in (1) Above Span=1506.00
7.Arithmetic Mean of 30 Seconds of Sampling CH4 Span Gas Mean [30 sec CH4]=515.00
8.Determine CH4 Response Factor by Dividing Step 7. by 2. RFCH4[THC-FID]=1.004 Pass
1065.365(e) Non-Methane Cutter Penetration Factor Determination
1.CH4 Span Gas Value =513.00
2.C2H6 Span Gas Value (As C1)=1006.00
3.C3H8 Span Gas Value (As C1)=1506.00
4.Zero FID In THC Mode Zero=0.00
5.Span FID with C3H8 in THC Mode (As C1)Span=1506.00
6.C3H8 Span Gas in CH4 Mode =-5.00
7.C3H8 Penetration Factor by Dividing Step 6. by Step 5.PF C3H8[MHC-FID]=-0.0033 Pass
8.C2H6 Span Gas in THC Mode =1007.00
9.C2H6 Span Gas in CH4 Mode =7.00
10.C2H6 Penetration Factor by Dividing Step 9. by Step 8.PF C2H6[MHC-FID]=0.007 Pass
11.CH4 Span Gas in THC Mode =557.00
12.CH4 Span Gas in CH4 Mode =516.00
13.CH4 Penetration Factor by Dividing Step 24. by Step 23.PF CH4[MHC-FID]=0.926 Pass
14.Check Zero Zero Check=-2.00 Pass
15.Check C3H8 Span Span Check=1499.00 Pass
Methane Response Factor RFCH4[THC-FID]=1.004
Methane Penetration Factor PF CH4[MHC-FID]=0.926
Ethane Penetration Factor PF C2H6[MHC-FID]=0.007
Propane Penetration Factor PF C3H8[MHC-FID]=-0.0033Test Result
NMHC FID Response & Penetration Factors
Pass
8/8/2024 2:52 PM CEMS Monthly Validation Checks August 2024 T6
Calibration Gas Level Analyzer Response Eff_NOx
NO2 ppm NOx ppm %
74.18 72.8 98.1
Eff_NOx must be ≥ 90%.
Method 7E - NOx Converter Efficiency Test
an Air Liquidecompany
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USALLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele, UT 84074
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:
Laboratory:
PGVP Number:
Gas Code:
Expiration Date:
E02NI99E15WOOB7
CC509054
124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT
B72023
N02,BALN
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
May 16, 2026
153-402721198-1
144.0 CF
2016 PSIG
660
May 16, 2023
Certification performed in accordance with "EPATraceabilityProtocolfor Assayand Certification of GaseousCalibration Standards(May2012)"documentEPA
600/R-12/531 ,usingtheassay procedures listed.Analytical Methodology doesnot requirecorrectionfor analytical interference.Thiscylinderhasa total analytical
uncertaintyas statedbelowwitha confidencelevelof 95%.Thereare nosignificantimpuritieswhichaffectthe useof this calibrationmixture.All concentrations areona
mole/molebasisunless'Otherwise noled,The-resatts-relate onlyto tha-items-tested.The repo;t-shafli'lOl-funeproduced exceptinfull withoutapprovalof thelaborat~.,Dtr----­
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig t.e. 0 7 megapascals.
Component
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
NITROGEN
Requested
Concentration
75.00 PPM
Balance
Type
GM1S
LotiO
12397
Cylinder No
CC511358
InstrumentlMakelModel

MKS FTIR N02 018143349

ANALYfIC.t\L RESULTS
Actual Protocol Total Relative Assay
Concentration Method Uncertainty Dates
74.18 PPM G1 +/-2.0% NIST Traceable 05/09/2023, 05/16/2023 .
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
59.32 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN +/-1.4% Dec'17,2024
ANALYfICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
FTIR May 03,2023
Triad Data Available Upon Request
I!l-.' ~~..
~
. i~
~
~ I~ ~i [!J~'=;'; . • .a
:It..
Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX C

Test Run Load %Site Rated Load, bhp Load Approx., bhp
1 54.5 325 177.1
2 55.2 325 179.4
3 54.7 325 177.8
Engine Load Approximation based on Panel Levels

APPENDIX D

Test
Run
Fd
Factor
Site Rated
bhp
Calculated
bhp
Avg O2
%
Moisture
Content %
NOx
ppm
Corrected
NOx
g/bhp-hr*
NOx
lbs/hr
CO
ppm
Corrected
CO
g/bhp-hr*
CO
lbs/hr
NMHC
ppm
Corrected
NMHC
g/bhp-hr*
NMHC
lbs/hr
1 8710 325 177.1 0.0 30.6 0.05 0.00 0.00 301.70 0.82 0.32 64.73 0.27 0.11
2 8710 325 179.4 0.0 28.9 0.08 0.00 0.00 292.14 0.79 0.31 61.70 0.26 0.10
3 8710 325 177.8 0.0 14.7 0.10 0.00 0.00 293.19 0.79 0.31 29.29 0.12 0.05
178.1 0.0 24.8 0.08 0.00 0.00 295.68 0.80 0.31 51.90 0.22 0.09
*BSFC = 9400 Btu/bhp-hr
EPA Method 19 Calculations
AVERAGE

APPENDIX E

RAW CALIBRATION DATA

LINEARITY AND PRE CAL
date_and_time test_number nox co voc o2
8/6/2024 7:33 978 1.1 4.7 0.3 20.4
8/6/2024 7:33 978 1.1 4.7 0.3 20.4
8/6/2024 7:33 978 1.2 4.8 0.3 20.4
8/6/2024 7:33 978 1.2 4.7 0.3 20.4
8/6/2024 7:34 978 119.8 0 0.3 14.9
8/6/2024 7:34 978 119.7 0.1 0.3 6.7
8/6/2024 7:34 978 119.6 0.1 0.3 2.8
8/6/2024 7:34 978 119.6 0 0.3 1.2
8/6/2024 7:34 978 242.6 0.2 0.3 0.9
8/6/2024 7:34 978 248.3 0.1 0.3 0.8
8/6/2024 7:35 978 248.6 0.2 0.3 0.6
8/6/2024 7:35 978 248.6 0.1 0.3 0.4
8/6/2024 7:35 978 249 0.2 0.3 0.2
8/6/2024 7:35 978 249.3 0.1 0.3 0.1
8/6/2024 7:35 978 252.4 0.3 0.3 0.1
8/6/2024 7:35 978 252.4 0.1 0.3 0.1
8/6/2024 7:36 978 251.2 0.2 299.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:36 978 251.4 0.2 299.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:36 978 251.4 0.2 299.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:36 978 251.4 0.1 299.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:36 978 251.3 0.2 493.7 0.1
8/6/2024 7:36 978 251.4 0.2 493.7 0.1
8/6/2024 7:37 978 252.1 0.1 492.8 0.1
8/6/2024 7:37 978 386.4 0.1 492.8 0.1
8/6/2024 7:37 978 507.2 0.2 526.7 0.1
8/6/2024 7:37 978 507.2 0.1 526.6 0.1
8/6/2024 7:37 978 507.2 0.2 0.3 0.1
8/6/2024 7:37 978 507.5 0 0.3 0.1
8/6/2024 7:38 978 507.2 0.1 0.3 0.1
8/6/2024 7:38 978 507.2 0.1 526.4 0.1
8/6/2024 7:38 978 501.8 0 526.6 0.1
8/6/2024 7:38 978 500.9 0.1 495.7 0.1
8/6/2024 7:38 978 502.2 49.8 495.7 0.1
8/6/2024 7:38 978 502.1 231.8 495.4 0.1
8/6/2024 7:39 978 502 372.3 495.4 0.1
8/6/2024 7:39 978 252.6 442.9 494.2 0.1
8/6/2024 7:39 978 1.8 467.6 494.2 0.1
8/6/2024 7:39 978 1.1 477.1 495.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:39 978 1.1 483.9 495.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:39 978 1.2 486.9 822.4 0.1
8/6/2024 7:40 978 1.1 487.5 822.5 0.1
8/6/2024 7:40 978 1.1 487.6 821.6 0.1
8/6/2024 7:40 978 1.2 487.3 821.6 0.1
8/6/2024 7:40 978 1.1 487.6 819.2 0.1
8/6/2024 7:40 978 1.1 487.3 819.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:40 978 1.1 490.3 819.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:41 978 1.4 489.9 819.1 0.1

8/6/2024 7:41 978 1.2 489.5 816.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:41 978 1.2 489.9 816.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:41 978 1.2 490.3 816.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:41 978 1.1 491.8 816.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:41 978 1.2 492.2 813.5 0.1
8/6/2024 7:42 978 0.1 492.5 813.5 0.0
8/6/2024 7:42 978 0.1 492.5 813.5 0.0
8/6/2024 7:42 978 0.1 632.9 0.1 0.0
8/6/2024 7:42 978 0.1 953.3 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:42 978 0.1 1199.3 0.4 0.0
8/6/2024 7:42 978 0.2 508.1 0.4 0.0
8/6/2024 7:43 978 0.4 520.5 1103.7 0.0
8/6/2024 7:43 978 0.5 1191.1 1103.9 0.0
8/6/2024 7:43 978 0.5 1195.4 847.5 0.1
8/6/2024 7:43 978 0.7 1198.1 847.4 0.1
8/6/2024 7:43 978 0.8 1185.7 847.1 0.1
8/6/2024 7:43 978 0.8 1189 847.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:44 978 0.7 1188 490.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:44 978 1 1188.6 490.0 0.1
8/6/2024 7:44 978 0.9 757.7 490.8 0.7
8/6/2024 7:44 978 1.1 387.3 490.9 3.8
8/6/2024 7:44 978 5.1 180.9 288.0 12.3
8/6/2024 7:44 978 5 92.7 288.0 16.3
8/6/2024 7:45 978 6.8 45.1 288.0 10.4
8/6/2024 7:45 978 4.6 17.8 0.3 10.6
8/6/2024 7:45 978 3.6 1.8 0.4 10.8
8/6/2024 7:45 978 2.7 0.2 0.4 10.8
8/6/2024 7:45 978 2.7 0.2 287.5 10.0
8/6/2024 7:45 978 2.6 0.2 287.7 10.1
8/6/2024 7:46 978 2.5 0.2 298.6 10.2
8/6/2024 7:46 978 2.4 0.2 298.6 10.3
8/6/2024 7:46 978 2.4 0.2 0.3 10.3
8/6/2024 7:46 978 2.3 0.2 0.3 10.3
8/6/2024 7:46 978 2.1 0.2 0.4 10.3
8/6/2024 7:46 978 1.9 2.7 0.3 10.4
8/6/2024 7:47 978 1.7 96 0.3 10.4
8/6/2024 7:47 978 1.6 73.2 0.4 8.8
8/6/2024 7:47 978 2 27.6 0.3 9.1
8/6/2024 7:47 978 1.8 0.2 0.3 20.8
8/6/2024 7:47 978 1.6 0 0.3 21.0
8/6/2024 7:47 978 1.5 0.2 0.3 20.1
8/6/2024 7:48 978 1.4 0.1 0.3 20.3
8/6/2024 7:48 978 1.1 0.2 0.3 20.5
8/6/2024 7:48 978 0 0.1 0.3 20.8
8/6/2024 7:48 978 0.1 0.2 0.3 18.0
8/6/2024 7:48 978 122 0.1 0.3 9.1
8/6/2024 7:48 978 246.1 0.3 0.3 4.0
8/6/2024 7:49 978 246.1 0.2 0.3 1.7
8/6/2024 7:49 978 248 0.2 0.3 1.1
8/6/2024 7:49 978 248.1 0 0.3 0.9
8/6/2024 7:49 978 248.2 161.6 0.3 0.8
8/6/2024 7:49 978 248.2 307.5 0.3 0.6

8/6/2024 7:49 978 126.8 387 0.3 0.4
8/6/2024 7:50 978 6.5 417.3 0.3 0.2
8/6/2024 7:50 978 6.4 429.3 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:50 978 5.4 432.1 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:50 978 5.5 434.3 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:50 978 5.2 435.7 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:50 978 5.4 436 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:51 978 5.2 435.9 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:51 978 4.9 492.2 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:51 978 4.8 491.9 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:51 978 0.1 491.5 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:51 978 0 490.7 0.3 0.0
8/6/2024 7:51 978 0.1 353.1 0.3 0.1
8/6/2024 7:52 978 4.3 190.7 0.3 4.7
8/6/2024 7:52 978 9.8 85.6 0.3 13.0
8/6/2024 7:52 978 9.9 35.4 0.3 11.5
8/6/2024 7:52 978 6.8 11.3 0.3 12.8
8/6/2024 7:52 978 2.4 0.2 0.3 13.2
8/6/2024 7:52 978 0.3 0.1 0.3 10.0
8/6/2024 7:53 978 234.9 0.2 0.3 10.1
8/6/2024 7:53 978 0.1 0.1 0.3 10.2
POST CAL 1
date_and_time test_number nox co voc o2
8/6/2024 8:55 978 0.4 291.4 53.2 0
8/6/2024 8:55 978 0.4 404.7 53.2 0
8/6/2024 8:55 978 0.7 312 149.9 0
8/6/2024 8:56 978 0.7 158.4 149.9 0
8/6/2024 8:56 978 120.9 61.1 0.2 0
8/6/2024 8:56 978 120.8 10.3 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:56 978 244.1 0.2 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:56 978 244.1 0.1 187.4 0
8/6/2024 8:56 978 243.9 0.3 187.4 0
8/6/2024 8:57 978 250.7 0.2 312.6 0
8/6/2024 8:57 978 251.3 0.2 312.6 0
8/6/2024 8:57 978 252.8 0.2 0 0
8/6/2024 8:57 978 252.7 113.3 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:57 978 252.8 285 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:57 978 134.8 408.9 312.9 0
8/6/2024 8:58 978 15 455.9 313 0
8/6/2024 8:58 978 14.9 475.7 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:58 978 14.9 484.5 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:58 978 15 488.3 0.3 0
8/6/2024 8:58 978 15 489.6 1104.6 0
8/6/2024 8:58 978 14.8 488.4 1104.9 0
8/6/2024 8:59 978 14.7 490.2 295.7 0
8/6/2024 8:59 978 14.7 489.5 295.5 0
8/6/2024 8:59 978 14.4 490.1 295.5 0
8/6/2024 8:59 978 14.2 490.1 295.5 0
8/6/2024 8:59 978 14.1 490.4 294.3 0
8/6/2024 8:59 978 14 490.4 294.3 0
8/6/2024 9:00 978 0.1 490.1 294.3 0

8/6/2024 9:00 978 0.4 490.1 294.3 0
8/6/2024 9:00 978 0.3 490.4 293.7 0
8/6/2024 9:00 978 0.4 407.9 0.2 0
8/6/2024 9:00 978 0.3 216.3 0.3 0.4
8/6/2024 9:00 978 0.3 81.2 0.3 2.6
8/6/2024 9:01 978 0.8 15.4 293.6 4
8/6/2024 9:01 978 1.7 0.1 293.7 4.6
8/6/2024 9:01 978 1.7 0.3 295.8 4.7
8/6/2024 9:01 978 1.7 0.2 0.2 4.8
8/6/2024 9:01 978 0.3 0.3 0.3 4.8
8/6/2024 9:01 978 0.4 0.1 0.3 4.9
8/6/2024 9:02 978 0.4 0.3 0.3 5.1
8/6/2024 9:02 978 0.4 0.3 0.3 5.2
8/6/2024 9:02 978 0.3 0.3 0.3 5.2
8/6/2024 9:02 978 0.5 0.3 0.3 5.2
8/6/2024 9:02 978 0 0.3 0.3 5.2
8/6/2024 9:02 978 0.4 0.3 0.3 10

POST CAL 2
Compound System Bias Response
NOx Zero (ppm) 0.0
NOx Span (ppm) 250.0
CO Zero (ppm) 0.0
CO Span (ppm) 493.0
VOC Zero (ppm) 0.0
VOC Span (ppm) 300.0
O2 Zero (%) 0.0
O2 Span (%) 10.0

POST CAL 3
date_and_time test_number nox co voc o2
8/6/2024 11:42 1138 0.2 211.9 27.1 0
8/6/2024 11:42 1138 0.1 271.9 25.4 0
8/6/2024 11:42 1138 0.1 267.8 25.4 0
8/6/2024 11:42 1138 1.3 158.2 181.9 0
8/6/2024 11:42 1138 121.5 66.5 181.9 0
8/6/2024 11:43 1138 121.6 15.5 255.1 0
8/6/2024 11:43 1138 121.6 0.2 255.2 0
8/6/2024 11:43 1138 244.6 0.1 268 0
8/6/2024 11:43 1138 247.1 0.1 268 0
8/6/2024 11:43 1138 247.3 0.1 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:43 1138 247.4 0.1 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:44 1138 247.3 0.1 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:44 1138 250.4 0.1 267.6 0
8/6/2024 11:44 1138 250.5 0.1 267.7 0
8/6/2024 11:44 1138 248.4 0.1 300.7 0
8/6/2024 11:44 1138 250.8 49.1 300.7 0
8/6/2024 11:44 1138 250.8 226.3 0.3 0
8/6/2024 11:45 1138 141.4 372.1 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:45 1138 29.4 389.1 0.4 0
8/6/2024 11:45 1138 29.4 249.3 0.4 2

8/6/2024 11:45 1138 29.4 132.6 0.4 10.6
8/6/2024 11:45 1138 32.8 71.3 0.4 14.3
8/6/2024 11:45 1138 32.8 40.5 0.4 16.5
8/6/2024 11:46 1138 25.2 20.1 0.4 17.9
8/6/2024 11:46 1138 25.3 6.4 0.4 18
8/6/2024 11:46 1138 7 0.1 0.5 18.2
8/6/2024 11:46 1138 7.1 8.3 0.5 18.4
8/6/2024 11:46 1138 1.2 164.4 0.4 18.5
8/6/2024 11:46 1138 1.2 324.1 0.4 14.3
8/6/2024 11:47 1138 0.9 422.7 0.4 6.7
8/6/2024 11:47 1138 0.6 464.4 0.4 2.9
8/6/2024 11:47 1138 0.6 481 0.4 1.4
8/6/2024 11:47 1138 0.6 488 0.4 1
8/6/2024 11:47 1138 0.7 490.9 0.4 0.9
8/6/2024 11:47 1138 0.7 492.3 0.4 0.8
8/6/2024 11:48 1138 0.9 492.9 0.4 0.6
8/6/2024 11:48 1138 0.5 494.3 0.4 0.4
8/6/2024 11:48 1138 0.8 366.6 0.4 0.2
8/6/2024 11:48 1138 0.8 179.9 0.4 1.1
8/6/2024 11:48 1138 0.9 64.8 0.4 5.4
8/6/2024 11:48 1138 0.9 8 0.4 7.9
8/6/2024 11:49 1138 0.8 0.2 0.4 9
8/6/2024 11:49 1138 0.6 0 0.4 9.1
8/6/2024 11:49 1138 0.6 0.2 0.4 9.2
8/6/2024 11:49 1138 0.6 0.1 0.4 9.4
8/6/2024 11:49 1138 0.2 0.2 0.4 10

Engine Test Sheet
~~t
Co !>oc)' l
-vo1-. 3 _
..,joe. L{ c.{ • s
Company Name J'It\h. ~-L
Location I Unit 1.0. R.D 'ffl'lhl-e,.. ~..;V 11~ ?.N"Pfddvc..J:"""-.
....-vO~ U; VrJ{.
11·1f\\-e",,~
':S" u--e.­.4 (/,.h ('__k-
Tvpeof Test Completed
Field Technician (s)
Client Rep and/or State Rep
Date ~/l,
oJ. 0 Non-Resettable Run Time Hours ftJ ,S ~oL Stack Diagram
Engine Make -'L..iA+
~V1" ;t.. Enaine Model 31.10""1'4­....,.... "~'.~ «~'W"" .,.. "'~.....-
Engine SIN 1.1 r-0 01 ~.1 I -~.~ TCO ~q,,~ Port Distance A
Port Distance B r \. A
·3 Exhaust Diameter (inches) ~v~ t¥c1f-. Calibration Gas Cvlinder# Concentration \. " '-.
vue; I.-{ t,.I.f' NOx Mid (ppm) ), 5'0­;l. [ -.NOx Span (ppm) ("'(:J7. S­
OJ.. 0 CO Mid (ppm) ...,q",
11"0 Span (ppm) t{ ~",
02/C02 Mixed Gas Mid % 1(1-L7 f B
02/C02 Mixed Gas Span % :::J..,J. 01 • i 1j(vn3 Mid LowVOC (ppm) J,., .P !
aq~.7
Mid HiQh VOC (ppm) ~(jj'" ,f:1 r~~l
Co VOC Span (ppm) k"'i· '1
Test 3
1'01'1
Test 2
1#:" 7
I ". I I "J ff
Test 1
·;~'<3 () • 0,
l ,7
(~ r
Atm Temp ("F)
EnQine RPM
Time of ReadinQ
Atm Pressure (in HQ)
*Manifold Pres.Vac(") or Boost(psi) or Boost (psjai
Manifold Temp ("F)
N"of.... • (
VOv IJ. f'. ()
Od­~ . --t.;~~=~:l..L::.:..-=..::.=~==...........:::!-_t____,'_~'---_+__T~--_+-~_;;;!_-__1
Psuction (psi) Stage 1
Tsuction (" F) Staae 1
Pdischar e (psi) StaQe 1
Psuction (psi) Stage 2
Tsuction 'F) StaQe 2
Pdischar e (psi) StaQe 2
Psuction (psi) Stage 3
Tsuction 'F) Stage 3
Pdischarae (psi) Staae 3
Psuction (psi) Stage 4
Tsuction ('F) Stage 4
PdischarQe (psi) Stage 4
IGas Throughput Immcf/d) or I '>CO¥: "'" )
Pre Cat Temp ('F)
Post Cat Temp ("F)
Cat Differential Pres. (" of H2O)
LaYS
1.0
1,.,'1 7
I. J­/. I'
DGM Console Modell Serial Number
Impinaer 1 (arams
Impinaer 2 'arams
Imoinaer 3 ,arams
Impinger 4 ,arams
Dry Gas Meter (cubic ft)
DGM Inlet Templlmoinaer Four Exit Temp (OF)
DGM Outlet Temp (OF)
71 174 h-c' I 'k'i 71" I S'~;,
02%
C02 %
LOAD % (~n}ll) or (Estimated)
Delta H
lanition Timina ('F) b.rU" 15_ 1
AFR Settina mV (Left Bank)
AFR SettinQ mV (RiQht Bank)
Rev 8
• Some units show boost in inches of Hg. In this situation please indicate if it is
positive (+) or negative(-). Eg: (+12") or (-5")
9/1712019