HomeMy WebLinkAboutDAQ-2024-0108661
DAQC-990-24
Site ID 10122 (B4)
MEMORANDUM
TO: STACK TEST FILE – BIG WEST OIL, LLC
THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager
FROM: Robert Sirrine, Environmental Scientist
DATE: October 1, 2024
SUBJECT: Source: MSCC (FCCU)
Location: 333 West Center Street, North Salt Lake, Davis County, Utah
Contact: Brady Miller, 385-324-1275
Tester: Erthwrks, Inc. Luke Morrison – 512-962-7661
FRS ID #: UT0000004901100008
AO #: DAQE-AN101220081-24, dated May 6, 2024
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol Dated September 20, 2024
On September 26, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a pretest protocol for the
Milli-Second Catalytic Cracking Process (FCCU) vent operating at the Big West Oil (BWO) refinery located
in North Salt Lake, Utah. Testing will be performed November 20-21, 2024, to determine HCN and NH3
emission factors found in Condition II.B.3.f, and 40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU.
PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:
1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rates: OK
3. RM 3A used to determine dilution concentrations of exhaust oxygen: OK
4. RM 4 used to determine stack gas moisture content: OK
5. ASTM D6348-03 used to determine HCN and NH3 emissions: OK
DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.
CONCLUSION: The protocol appears acceptable. The Source AO does not indicate that 40
CFR 63, Subpart UUU is applicable which requires a one-time HCN test on
applicable FCCUs. The source is testing for HCN because specific parts of
Subpart UUU applies to other BWO monitoring requirements. The NH3
emission factor is used in some of the emission inventory calculations, so
BWO has decided to test for a new emissions factor.
RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.
ATTACHMENTS: Stack testing protocol dated September 20, 2024.
.,,.dh_4"
BigWest Oil 333 W. Center Street . North Salt Lake Utah 84054 . 801.296.7700 . www.bigwestoil.com
September 20,2024
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT NO.9589 0710 5270 1318 3715 06
Rob Leishman
Division of Air Quality
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake city, Utah 84114-4820
RE: 4Q2024 MSCC Performance Test Plan - Big West Oil
DEPAT]TMENT OF
ENVIHONMEN]AL QUALITY
sEP 2 4 2024
DIVISION OF AIR OUALITY
Dear Mr. Leishman,
Enclosed is the site-specific test plan for the performance test that Erthwrks will be conducting on
Big West Oil's MSCC Regenerator Vent during the week of November 21,2024. Erthwrks will
be conducting this MSCC performance test in accordance with the requirements found in 40 CFR
63.1571(a)(6xii). During this test, NH: emissions will also be analyzed using the same method.
The purpose of this MSCC performance test is to confirm the prior HCN emissions testing results
required by 40 CFR 63 Subpart UUU, $63.1571(ax6xii). Concurrently, this test will also be
determining a site-specific NH: emission factor for more accurate emission program reporting.
For questions regarding this performance test plan, pleasecontactBrady Miller at (385) 324-
1275.
Enclosure: Erthwrks MSCC Performance Test Plan
Brady Miller
Environmental Engineer
A'R EM'SS'ONS TESflNG FOR
'NDUSIRY
Emission Testing Protocol
Big w.rfbiL LLC
at the
North Salt Lake Refinery
Hydrogen Cyanide and Ammonia Determinotion
on the
MSCC Regenerator Vent
subject to
Permit No. DAQE-ANIO 1220081-24
40 CFR 63, Subpart UUU
Test Dates: November 21, 2024
Erthwrks Project No. 9855
+*
CARB
DIT'ANIMINT OF
ENVIHONMLNIAL QUALITY
SEP 2 4 202t1
DIVISION OF AIR OUNLITY
prepored for
STAE
Endorsement Page
This protocol was developed in accordance with the requirements designated in the applicable
regulatory permit(s) and or regulatory rules. To the best of my knowledge the techniques,
instrumentation, and calculations presented in this protocol will serve to complete the test
campaign requ irements accurately and effi c iently.
Erthwrks,Inc.
Name:
Title
Signature:
Name:
Title
Signature:
This protocol has been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. The actions presented in this
protocol are, to the best of my knowledge, an accurate representation of the necessary work scope
needed to successfully complete the requirements of the test campaign. Erthwrks operates in
conformance with the requirements of ASTM D7036-04 Standard Practice for Competence of
Air Emission Testing Bodies.
Erthwrks,Inc.
Luke Morrison
John Wood
errm!Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 219/20/2024],
2ofL6
I .0 [NTRODUCTrON...... ...................... 4
l.l Contact Information/On-Site Personnel ............4
2.0 FACILTTY DESCRIPTION........... .......................5
3.0 SAMPLINC AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES........... ....................5
3.1 Gaseous Sampling -Oz and CO2............ ............5
3.2 Direct Interface FTIR for HCNNH3 ................7
3.3 CO Monitoring............ ....................7
3.4 Discussion of methodology variations or operational variances .............7
4.0 Ceneral Work Sequence, Site Hazards and Mitigation, and Tentative Schedule ....... 8
4.1 Ceneral/ Overall Safety Precautions and Risk Mitigation.. ....................8
4.2 Tentative Schedule.... .......................9
Appendix A............... .........10
Example SOR and Calculations................ .............10
List of Tables
Table I : Test Matrix .......................5
Table 2: Tentative Work Schedule... .................9
erfhwrk3
Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 219/20/2024)
Erthwrks, Inc. has been contracted to provide air emission testing services for Big West Oil
(BWO) at the North Salt Lake Refinery located in North Salt Lake, UT. This testing program will
be conducted on the Millisecond-Catalytic Cracking Process (MSCC) for the determination of
Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN). The purpose of this activity is to confirm the prior emission testing
results required by the 40 CFR 63 Subpart UUU, $63.1571(aX6)(ii). The testing is scheduled for
November 21,2024.
In addition, concurrent testing will be conducted utilizing the same methodology for the
determination of a site-specific ammonia (NH3) emission factor for more accurate emission
program reporting.
Big West Oil, LLC
Brady Miller
Env ironmental Engineer
333 W Center St.
North Salt Lake, UT 84054
385-324-1275
brady.m i I ler@bigwestoil.com
Erthwrks,Inc.
Luke Morrison
Project Manager
P.O. Box 150549
Austin, TX787l5
512-962-7661 office
888-573-9994 fax
Lmo rrison@erthwrks.com
Erthwrks,Inc.
John Wood
Technical Director
P.O. Box 150549
Austin, TX 78715
512-585-1685 office
888-573-9994 fax
jwood@erthwrks.com
Facility Location:
Big West Oil, LLC
North Salt Lake Refinery
333 W Center St
North Salt Lake, UT 84054
erfhwa
Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 2 (9/20/2024],
4of15
Table l: Test Matrix
40 CFR 63
Subpart UUU
HCN Mass Rate /
Emission Factor
EPA Method 1,2,3A
ASTM D6348-03'i 3, l-hour Runs
NHi Mass Rate /
Emission Factor
EPA Method 1,2,3A
ASTM D6348-03*3, l-hourRuns
*ln accordance with 563. I 57 I (a)(6)(iil(B), ASTM D6348-03 Sections A I -A8 will be followed, Annex A5 (analyte
spiking technique) will be determinedfor each target analyte, and the %R will be between 70'% and I 30% lo
validate the tesling results. Slack moisture content will be determinedfrom ASTIVI D6348 for the exhaust flow /
mass emission rate calculation.
Located in North Salt Lake. Utah, the facility is a high conversion refinery operated by Big West
Oil LLC. a rvholly orvned subsidiary of FJ Management lrrc. The lacility has a total capacity of
35.000 barrels per day and refines a combination of Utah. Wyorning and Canadian crude oils into
high-quality motor firels and other specialty chernicals. Big West Oil products meet or exceed
government standards fbr clean transportation firels. as r,vell as cLlstomer needs fbr engine
perfbrmance and cold flow qualities.
For all gaseous sampling, Erthwrks will insert a stainless-steel probe, of sufficient length to reach
all sampling points, into a sampling port that is located on the stack in accordance with EPA
Method l. The sample is extracted through the probe, a heated Teflon sampling line, to a heating
filter. The sample then enters a minimum contact sample conditioner that cools and removes
moisture from the gas matrix prior to entering the Erthwrks sampling manifold.
For this project, the following Reference Methods will be used as applicable:
o EPA Method 3,A for the determination of Oz and COz concentrationo EPA Method l -4 for volumetric flow rate
Erthwrks will follow all quality assurance and quality control procedures as defined in US EPA
40 CFR 60 Appendix A. The Calibration Error (CE) Test will be conducted as specified in EPA
Method 7E $8.2.3. [n accordance with this requirement, athree-point analyzer calibration error
test will be conducted prior to sampling. The CE test will be conducted by introducing the low,
mid, and high-levelcalibration gasses (as defined in EPA Method 7E $3.3.1-3) sequentially and
the response will be recorded. The results of the CE test are acceptable if the calculated
calibration error is within *2.0yo of calibration span (or < 0.5 ppmv).
Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 2 (9/20/2024\
5of15
erfhrtrrQ
The Initial System Bias and System Calibration Error Check will be conducted in accordance
with EPA Method 7E $8.2.5. The upscale calibration gas will be introduced at the probe
upstream of all sample system components and the response will be recorded. The procedure
will be repeated with the low-level gas and the response will be recorded. The sample system
response time will also be recorded. This specification is acceptable if the calculated values of
the system calibration error check are within *5.lyo of the calibration span value (or <0.5 ppmv).
After each compliance test run, the sample system bias check will be conducted to validate the
run data. The low-level and upscale drift will be calculated using Equation 7E-4. The run data
is valid if the calculated drift is within +3.UYo of the calibration span value (or <0.5 ppmv).
After each test run, the effluent gas concentration will be calculated as specified in EPA Method
7E $12.6. The arithmetic average of all valid concentration values willbe adjusted for bias using
equation 7E-5B.
The figure below details the Erthwrks Gaseous Sampling System.
S.mpl. Prcb.
s.mpl. sy.t m ll.. c.llbntlon Lln.
h..t d rampl. lln.
C.llbEtlon Gaaaaa
g
.9aEa
EaI rotomatar
rctomatar
Figure 1: Example Erthwrks Gaseous Sampling System Diagram
erfrtft Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 2 .9120/2024l.
6of16
Erthwrks will follow all quality assurance and sampling procedures as outlined in ASTM-D6348-
03. Three l-hour sampling runs will be used to quantify average concentrations of HCN and
NH3.
A series of pre-test preparations and evaluations will be conducted on site priorto sampling as
outlined in ASTM-D6348-03. These procedures include determining a minimum detection limit
(MDL), determining the sample system response time, developing a spectral background, and the
introduction of a calibration transfer standard (CTS) to veriff sample cell pathlength.
The calibration transfer standard will be introduced directly to the FTIR sampling cell, and the
results will be recorded. The measured response of the FTIR will be within 5% of the certificate
value. Erthwrks will use an EPA Protocol I gas cylinder containing ethylene at approximately
100 ppm as the CTS.
Upon completion of all required pre-test measures, Erthwrks will perform a dynamic spike. A
pollutant of known concentration will be introduced to the sample system at the tip of the probe
and will be mixed with the effluent gas at a ratio no greater than l0: l. A flowmeter and tracer gas
(SF6) will be used to measure the spiking rate. A recovery percentage between 70% -l30Yowill
be achieved before sampling commences.
During sampling Erthwrks will utilize a scanning rate of 64 scan/min and an averaging rate of 60
seconds. A spectrum will then be generated once every 60 seconds, and the resulting
concentrations will be added to the cumulative data file. All spectra and raw interferograms will
be appropriately named and saved.
In accordance with $63.1571(a)(6XiiXB), ASTM D6348-03 Sections Al-A8 will be followed,
Annex 45 (analyte spiking technique) will be determined for each target analyte, and the %R
will be between 70oh and 130% to validate the testing results.
CO monitoring will be conducted
Big West Oil will provide the CO
an appendix in the final report.
in accordance with 40 CFR 63 Subpart UUU, table
data from their CEMS system. This data will be
12, item2.
included in
This emission
variances.
program is expected to be conducted no sampling or operational
errml Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 2 (9/20/20241
7of16
Erthwrks works diligently to eliminate and minimize potential hazards as they apply to our
equipment and the test procedures used during the field campaign. A list of safety risk mitigation
measures to be employed by the Erthwrks teams during the field campaign is summarized in
subsections below. These mitigation measures range from general items applicable to the overall
field campaign as well as specific measures associated with the mobile lab/electrical equipment
as well as the field execution. The minimum PPE requirements will include hard hats, safety
glasses with side shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, fall
protection, and a personal HzS monitor. The following hazards are expected during the field test
campaign:
Working at heights.
Using and transporting compressed gases.
Electrical hazards from high voltage planVgenerator power sources and operation of
electrical equipment inside and outside the test van.
Heat stress and fatigue.
Fire hazards associated with non-intrinsically safe equipment.
Hot surfaces (stacks and sample ports ryill be at high temperatures).
Tripping hazards present around test van (multiple power cords connected to test van and
sample line) and on sampling platform.
. All Erthwrks personnel attend annual basic plus mandatory trainings, including all
required site-specific training and background checks.
o All field team members will be equipped with proper PPE compliant with BWO
procedures.
o Per Erthwrks requirements, a Job Safety Analysis (JSA) form will be prepared by all
members of the field staff prior to commencement of the field campaign.
Each day will begin with a TBT conducted by the field team lead discussing potential
hazards, and evacuation routes specific to that day's location within BWO.
No work will begin until a proper permit has been issued and all necessary BWO
Operations staff has been informed.
o The mobile lab will be parked at the nearest allowable/safest location below the stack
area.
A field technician will ascend the stack to the sampling platform and use a rope to haul a
heated sampling line to the platform. The sample line will be secured to the platform by
use of rope or suitable temporary fasteners.
All elevated work, including work on the sample platform, will be done with proper
harnessing and fallprotection equipment (if required) and approved by BWO.
a
o
a
a
o
o
a
Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 2 (9/20/2024\
8of16
erfhvvrQ
o Technicians working on the stack platform will have appropriate heat resistant gloves
when removing sampling port plugs and when handling hot sampling probes.
o All hand tools will be equipped with lanyards and stored in tool bags to prevent dropped
objects.
o The sampling line will be secured to the platform and at other point(s) on the unit to
minimize swinging.
o Once tests at a particular stack are completed, a field technician will ascend to the stack
platform and carefully lower the heated sample line. The power supply will be unhooked
from the lab and the area cleared (with good housekeeping). Operations will be informed,
and the lab will be driven away from the area and parked in an approved area of the plant
or at the next testing location.
o Setup and teardown procedures will involve all Field Team staff
Table 2: Tentative Work Schedule
MSCC Emission Testing HCN and NH3November 21,2024
Erthwrks Project No. 9855 -Big West Oil North Salt Lake Refinery
MSCC HCN and NH3 Emission Testing -Version 2 (9/20/20241
10 of 16
Erthwrks Summary of Results
Date:
Client:
Facility:
Unit lD:
Erthwrks Tech:
6t4t2024
Run Number
Date
Run Start Time
Run End Time
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
6t4t2024 6t4t2024 6t412024
17:23 18:40 19:53
18:23 19:40 20:53
NSP Gas Flow (MSCFD)
NSP GAS GC (molecular weight)
NSP GAS GC (Btu/lb) LHV
NSP GAS GC (Btu/lb) HHV
NSP GAS LHV (Btu/sc0
NSP GAS HHV (Btu/ScO
NSP Gas Fd (dscf/MMBtu)
114',t 1157 1 139
18.66 18.67 18.70
19905 19872 19850
22017 21981 21957
979 978 978
1082 1082 1092
8691 8691 8691
1145.7
18.68
19875.7
21985.0
978.3
1085.3
8691.0
PSA Gas Flow (MSCFD)
PSA GAS GC (molecular weight)
PSA GAS GC (Btu/lb) LHV
PSA GAS GC (Btu/lb) HHV
PSA GAS LHV (Btu/sc0
PSA GAS HHV (Btu/scf)
PSA Gas Fd (dscf/MMBtu)
5694.0 5663.0 5550.0
21.7 21.8 21.7
4303 0 4304.0 4386.04895.0 4889 0 4985.0
246.0 247.0 250.0
280.0 280.0 284.08719 8719 8719
5635.7
21 .7'l
4331.0
4923.0
247.7
281.3
8719
NSP Gas Duty LHV
NSP Gas Duty HHV
PSA Gas Duty LHV
PSA Gas Duty HHV
Total Duty LHV
Total Duty HHV
Combined Fuel Fd (dscf/MMBtu) 'NsP fraction 0.17 PsA fraction o.83
o/o ol Max Duty LHV Max Duty 125.6 MMBtU/hr
% of Max Dutv HHV Max DUN 139.6 MMBtU/hr
46.5 47.2 46.4
51.5 52.2 51.3
58.5 58.2 57.9
66.5 66.2 65 8
105.0 105.4 104.3
1 18.0 1 18.3 ',117 .1
8714 8714 87',t4
84% 84% 83%
85Yo 85% 84Yo
46.7
51.7
58.2
66.2
104.9
117.8
8714
83.5%
84.4%
NOx (ppmvd)
NH3 (ppmvd)
COz (%vd)
CO (ppmvd)
Oz(%vd)
Moisture (B*)
Exhaust Flow (scf/h0
13.91 12.37 12.25
9 07 8.1 8 9.64
12.23 12.22 12.10
0.60 0.24 0.41
6.42 6 33 6.59
01475 0.1666 0.1608
1 .62E+06 1.56E+06 1 .61 E+06
't2.85
8.96
12.19
0.42
6.45
0.1583
1.60E+06
NOx (ppmvd @7 o/oO2)
NHr (ppmvd @7 o/oOz\
13.36 11.81 1't.90
8.70 7.81 9.36
12.35
8.62
NOx (lb/scf)
NH3 (lb/scf1
1.66E-06 1.48E-06 1.46E-064.01E-07 3.62E-07 4.26E-07
1.53E-06
3.96E-07
NOx (lb/MMBtu HHV)
NH: (lb/MMBtu HHV)
0.021 0.018 0.019
0.00s 0.005 0.005
0.0193
0.0050
NOx (lb/hr)
NH3 (tb/ho
2.69 2.30 2.360.65 0.56 0.69
2.45
0.63
of '16
Erthwrks QAQC Example Calculations
Example Calculations for Pollutant :02
os, = c,L; c, * roo
ACE = O,460/o
CDi. = 10.01
Cv = 9.92
CS= 20.00
o/o
o/o
o/o
sn,= Sffei.. * roo
SB; = -0.550/o
CS= 20.00
Cs = 9.90
Co'. = 10.01
o/o
o/o
o/o
D = ABSISBT - SBi I
SBi = -0.550/o
SBr - -0.680/o
D=O.l3o/o
ccu. = (caue-c") #%;
Cc"" = 6.42
Ca,8= 6.42
Co = 0.07
Cne = 9.92
Cu = 9.88
o/o
o/o
o/o
o/o
Variahle:Descrintion:
co
Cor.
Coi.
CM
CMA
CS
cs
cv
SBr
SBI
Average ofthe pre- and post-run system cal bias responses from zero gas, ppmv.
Average unadjusted gas concentration for test run, ppmv.
Measured concentration of the cal gas when introduced in direct mode, ppmv.
Average ofthe pre- and post-run system cal bias responses from the upscale gas, ppmv.
Actual concentration ofthe upscale calibration gas, ppmv.
Calibration span, ppmv.
Measured concentration ofthe cal gas when introduced in the system cal mode, ppmv.
Manufacturer certified concentration of calibration gas, ppmv.
Post-run system bias, percent ofcalibration span.
Pre-run system bias, percent ofcalibration span.
Erthwrks Example Calculations
Nomenclature
MGV Molar gas volume, volume of gas at standard conditions, scf/lbmol
V Volume, ft3
n Moles, lbmol
Fd Fuel F Factor, scf/MMBtu
%O2d Oxygen concentration measured on a dry basis, %
FH Fuel Heating Value (MMBtu/hr)
Hp Engine horse power during test, hp
Constants
R 10.7316 Universal gas constant, ft3 psi / R lbmol
Ts 527.67 Standard Temperature, R
p" 14.696 Standard Pressure, psi
MW1ro, 46.0055 Molecular Weight of NOx, lb/lbmol
MWco 28.0104 MolecularWeightof CO, lb/lbmol
MWsoz 64.0588 Molecular Weight of SO2, lb/lbmol
MWvoc 44.0962 Molecular Weight of VOC as propane, lb/lbmol
Fd 8675 Fuel F Factor for Natural Gas, scf/MMBtu
Conv,oo 453.6 Number of grams in one pound
Molar gas volume (MGV) calculation at standard conditions (ldeal Gas Law)
MGV
R'T"
Psn
\NhereT= 293.15 K
P = 760 mmHgft= 62.3637 L mmHg
K mol
V
n
Molar Gas Volume
62.3637 . 293.15
760
gmol
MGV 1 0.7316 ' 527 .67
n
385.325
14.696
MGV scf
lbmol
Emission Concentration, Crq,, lb/scf (For NOx, Run 1)
C*ot PPMN6, ' MW1,o,- 106MGV
_ 13.91 ' 46.0055 r
385.325
1.66E-06
24.055
10-6CHo,
tb
scfCro,
EXAN/I PLE
Erthwrks Example Calculations
Emission Rate Calculation, E11ry1uetu1, (For NOx, Run 1)
E-L(tbfrrMBtu)
E116rul,tatr1 =
L(IbiilMBfuI
trE*vNOx I d
1.66E-06' 8710 r
tb0.026
20.9
2O9 - '/"Ozd
9.08
MW * 1.556*10^-7
46.006 * 1.556',10^-7
20.9
Emission Rate Calculation, Eqrwrnp (For NOx, Run 1)
MMBtu
E1pn,) = Nox PPmd * Qstd (dscfin) *
E11orrr4 = 13.914 '27030.448'
EXAN/I PLE
Erthwrks Example Calculations
Nomenclature
Cco Carbon Monoxide concentration measured on a dry basis, ppmv
C"o, NOx concentration measured on a dry basis, ppmv
Cvoc VOC concentration measured on a dry basis, ppmv
%O2d Oxygen concentration measured on a dry basis, %
Emission Concentrations Corrected to 15% 02 (For NOx, Run 1)
Nox = cro,. *n=-ET??20.9 - %O2d
Nox = 13e1 -j3##
Nox = 6.es ,lS:[9
EXAN/I PLE
Erthwrks Method 1-4 Example Calculations
Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, M6
Mo = 0.440 (o/oCO2) + 0.320 (%O2) + 0.280 (%N2 + YoCO)
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, M"
M. = Mo (1 - Bws) + 18.0 * Bws
Mo = Molecular weight of stack gas, dry
Average Stack Gas Velocity, v"
v. = Kp * Cp " Ap("un)"' t 1t2ls(abs)
P""M.
(lb/lb-molX"Hg 1/2
('R)(inH2O)
0.84
Ts(abs) = Avg Stack Temp ('F) + 460
P, = Stack Pressure (Pbar + Pg) ("Hg)
M" = MW of Stack Gas (see above)
+ 0.32 * 6.420/o 0.28 . 81.35%
0.8688 "( 962.3 / 28.96 I 28.41 )1t2
. 28.96
Md=
Md=
0.44 * 12.23o/o
30.2{36
Eq.3-1
Eq.2-G
Eq.2'7
Eq.2-8
Ms
M"
(Method 3)
Bws = Water vapor in gas stream
(Method 4)
= 30.21 * (1-0.149 ) + 19.0 .0.149
= 28.41
Vs=
vc=
Kp = 85.49 fUsec
Cp = Pitot Coefficient
85.49 . 0.84 .
67.467
Average Stack Gas Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, Q
Q = 3600. (1 - Bws) * v" * A. (Trro ) ( P" )
(Ts(aos))(P.to)
Ttto = 528 "R
P'to = 29'92 "H9
o-
Q=
3600 ( 1 - 0.148 \ 67.467 * 14.75 *( 528.0,.,=-OEXAN/I
PLE
962.25 I 29.92)