DDW-2024-011758

October 7, 2024
Neal Winterton
Pleasant Grove City
70 South 100 East
Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062
Subject:Plan Approval, Wade Springs Redevelopment Project (WS002);
Pleasant Grove City, System #25022, File #16409
Dear Neal Winterton:The Division of Drinking Water (the Division) received the plans and specifications for the proposed Wade Springs Redevelopment Project from your consultant, Scott
Greenhalgh and Hansen Allen & Luce, Inc. Engineers on September 5, 2024.Our understanding of the project is the redevelopment of the north portion of the spring by replacing the collapsed
section of pipe with new 10-inch diameter perforated PVC collection pipe, updating the collection boxes, and the installation of new collection area gravel to maximize the collection
of spring water. The south portion of the spring was redeveloped in 2011. The spring name will remain as Wade Spring and is identified as WS002 in the Division’s database.
We have received the following information forWade Springs Redevelopment Project:
Plans and specifications for spring redevelopment.
We have completed our review of the plans and specifications, stamped, and signed by Scott Royal Greenhalgh, P.G., and dated September 5, 2024,and find they basically comply with the
applicable portions of Utah’s Administrative Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems in R309. On this basis, the plans for redeveloping Wade Springs are hereby approved.
Please label the spring water sample collected for new source chemical analysis with your water system number UTAH25022 and WS002 (for both the facility ID and sample point ID) on all
laboratory forms for each individual source. This will ensure proper identification and entry of the new source chemical analysis results in our database.
This approval pertains to construction only. Following completion of construction, you must obtain an Operating Permit prior to placing Wade Springsinto service. A checklist outlining
the spring approval process, including the items required for issuing an Operating Permit is enclosed for your information.
Enclosed please also find an Operating Permit Checklist for other components of this project.Please note that, before requesting an Operating Permit for this project, you must submit
the required new source chemical analysis data to the Division for review to determine whether additional treatment is required for using the Wade Spring as a public drinking water source.The
operating permit will include requirements for monthly Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) sampling at Wade Spring (WS002), also called assessment monitoring, during the operating period when
the spring is accessible for a minimum of 6 months. This monitoring is required to evaluate the quality of the water coming from Wade Spring (WS002) to better protect public health.
Additional monitoring and/or disinfection requirements may be assigned depending on the results of the assessment monitoring. Approvals or permits from the local authority or county
may be necessary before beginning construction of this project. As the project proceeds, notice of any changes in the approved design, as well as any change affecting the quantity or
quality of the delivered water, must be submitted to the Division. We may also conduct interim and final inspections of this project. Please notify us when actual construction begins
so that these inspections can be scheduled.
This approval must be renewed if construction has not begun or if substantial equipment has not been ordered within one year of the date of this letter.
Drinking Water Source Protection Requirement
A revised Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) plan is required within 180 days after the reconstruction or redevelopment of any ground-water source of drinking water (refer to R309-600-7(2)(f)).
The revised plan must address changes in source construction, development, hydrogeology, delineation of the source protection zones, the potential contamination source inventory, etc.,
as applicable. An updated DWSP plan is currently pending review by Division staff but did not address the redevelopment. If redevelopment of the spring does not result in changes that
would affect delineation of the source protection zones, please send an email to Deidre Beck, P.G., at [e-mail] indicating that no changes have occurred to the source protection
zones due to the redevelopment. If you have any questions about the source protection requirements, please contact Deidre Beck, P.G., at [phone] or via email at [e-mail].
If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Brent Arns, of this office, at [phone], or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael Newberry, P.E.
Permitting and Engineering Support Manager
BA/DLB/mrn/mdb
Enclosures ─ Spring Approval Checklist; Operating Permit Checklist cc:Daymon Swenson, Utah County Health Department, [e-mail] Tveten, Pleasant Grove City, [e-mail]
Greenhalgh, Hansen, Allen, & Luce Inc., [e-mail] Winterton, Pleasant Grove City, [e-mail] Martin, P.E., Division of Drinking Water, [e-mail]
Arns, Division of Drinking Water, [e-mail] Beck, P.G., Division of Drinking Water, [e-mail] 25022 16409 PA Wade Springs RedevelopmentDivision of Drinking WaterChecklist
for New or Redeveloped Public Drinking Water Springs
System Name:System Number:Spring Name & Description:1.Approval to Develop (or Redevelop) the Spring
☐Project Notification Form
☐Preliminary Evaluation Report (PER) concurrence (for new springs)
☐Spring location data
☐Documentation of valid water right(s)
☐If available, an engineer’s or geologist’s statement indicating:
☐The historical record of the spring flow variation
☐Expected minimum flow and the time of the year it will occur
☐Expected maximum flow and the time of the year it will occur
☐Expected average flow
☐The behavior of the spring during drought conditions
☐New source chemical analyses of the spring water (for new springs or existing springs that have not been sampled) [R309-515-4(5)]
☐An assessment of whether the spring is “under the direct influence of surface water” [This assessment can be based on an on-site inspection, known geological conditions, or specific
water analysis results such as an MPA.]
☐Detailed plans and specifications for spring developmentor redevelopment2.Operating Permit to Use the Spring Water
☐Information on the rate of flow developed from the spring
☐Historical spring flow data or a minimum of 3 years of spring flow data — for determining the spring yield and issuing an Operating Permit

☐Current spring flow rate — for issuing a temporary Operating Permit (in case of insufficient flow data for determining the spring yield)
☐ Recorded land use agreements, or documentation that the requirements for coverage under the City/County source protection ordinance have been met
☐Design engineer’s certification of rule conformance with plan approval conditions
☐Design engineer’s certification of rule conformance for any deviation from approved plans
☐As-built or record drawings
☐Proof of satisfactory bacteriological quality
☐Water quality data, where appropriate [If the initial new source sampling indicates unsatisfactory turbidity, the spring water must be re-sampled and proven to have turbidity level
below the MCL.]
Utah Division of Drinking Water ― Checklist for Issuing Operating PermitsWater System Name:System Number: Project Description:File Number:
Items 1 through 8 below must be submitted to the Division and found to be acceptable prior to operating permit issuance (unless a water line project meets the requirements of R309-500-7
and is not required to obtain an Operating Permit).
Distribution lines (not including in-line booster pump stations) requiring Plan Approval may be placed into service prior to submitting all of the following items and receipt of Operating
Permit if the water system has received items 1 and 4 below.☐1.Certification of Rule Conformance by a professional engineer (P.E.) that all conditions of Plan Approval were accomplished,
and if applicable, changes made during construction were in conformance with rules R309-500 through 550☐2.As-built or record drawings incorporating all changes to approved plans and
specifications (unless no changes were made to the previously approved plans during construction)☐3.Confirmation that as-built or record drawings have been received by the water system☐4.Satisfactory
bacteriological samples as evidence of proper disinfection and flushing in accordance with the appropriate ANSI/AWWA standards:
☐ANSI/AWWA C651-14 AWWA Standard for Disinfecting Water MainsTwo consecutive sample sets at least 16 hours apart, none positive (every 1200 feet, end-of-line, each branch, etc.)☐ANSI/AWWA
C652-11 AWWA Standard for Disinfection of Water-Storage FacilitiesOne or more samples, none positive☐ANSI/AWWA C653-13 AWWA Standard for Disinfection of Water Treatment PlantsTwo consecutive
samples per unit, none positive, no less than 30 minutes apart☐ANSI/AWWA C654-13 AWWA Standard for Disinfection of WellsTwo consecutive samples, none positive, no less than 30 minutes
apart☐5.Water quality data, where appropriate [For example, water quality data showing MCL compliance; raw and finished water data that demonstrate satisfactory performance of the new
treatment facility.]☐6.If applicable, all other documentation that may have been required during the plan review process☐7.If applicable, confirmation that the water system owner has
received the O&M manual for the new facility☐8.If applicable, location data of new storage tank, treatment facility, or source