DSHW-2024-008548

CORRECTIVE ACTION SECTION – SITE VISIT REPORT
SITE NAME: Ninigret Eastern Alum Ponds DATE: 09 / 12 / 2024
EPA ID #: UTD009073800 UTCA ID#: N/A
LOCATION: 1700 South 4650 West, Salt Lake City, UT
PROJECT MANAGER: Ethan Upton
SITE STATUS
___ Active Investigation
___Ongoing Cleanup Activities
___Confirmation Sampling
_X_ Long-term Institutional Controls in-place [Site
Management Plan (SMP), Environmental
Covenant (EC), and/or Post Closure Plan (PCP)]
__ Long-term Groundwater Monitoring
OTHER (describe):
PURPOSE OF SITE VISIT
_X_Drive-by (windshield survey)
___Sample Observation &/or Collection
___Site Investigation
___Cleanup Activities Inspection
_X_Confirm Current Land Usage
___ Confirm Cleanup Completed
___ Confirm Integrity of Engineering Controls
_X_ Confirm Compliance with SMP/EC
D2# for SMP/EC: DSHW-2022-017482,
DSHW-2008-001391
___ Post-Closure Permit Verification
___ Document Change in Land Usage
OTHER (describe)
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
The Site continues to be used for industrial/commercial purposes. The Brighton canal appears to remain
untouched as was observed historically with no re-routing. During the Site visit it was observed that a
large area was being developed with excavation and regrading occurring. According to the Site
Management Plan and Environmental Covenant, the soil (within risk range for a construction worker) is
allowed to be excavated. However, construction workers should be notified of potential hazardous and
possible exposure to Site contaminants. The soil appears to remain on-Site (no removal of Site soils) and
used to grade the land for development at the Site. See images attached.
SAMPLE COLLECTION
Were Environmental Samples Collected per the approved Sampling & Analysis Plan?
YES ___ NO ___ N/A _X_
COMMENTS:
Is the Work Being Performed in a Manner Consistent with the Approved Workplan(s)?
YES ___ NO ___ N/A _ X_ Unknown (Drive-By Inspection Only) ___
COMMENTS:
CURRENT LAND USAGE
___ Residential
_X_ Commercial
_X_ Industrial
___ Mixed Commercial w/ Residential
___ Under Construction &/or Development
___ Other: __________________________________
COMMENTS:
FUTURE LAND USAGE
___ Residential ___ Mixed Commercial w/ Residential
_X_ Commercial ___ Other: (describe below)
_X_ Industrial ___ Unknown at this time
COMMENTS:
POST-CLEANUP SITE VISITS
Is the Completed Cleanup Remedy Still Protective Based on Current Land Use?
YES ___ NO ___ Unknown (Drive-By Inspection Only) _X_
COMMENTS:
LONG-TERM INSTITUTION CONTROL(S) VERIFICATION
Are Components or Restrictions of the SMP, EC &/or PCP Currently Being Complied with?
YES _X_ NO ___ Unknown (Drive-By Inspection Only) ___
COMMENTS:
SITE VISIT CONCLUSIONS
The Site appears to be in compliance with the SMP and EC. Observations of the area being developed
should be made during the next SMP inspection.
RECOMMENDATIONS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (PHOTOS, MAPS, FIGURES, TABLES, etc.) YES _X_ NO __
SIGNATURE: