DERR-2024-011096

Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund
Work Plan Approval Application and Agreement
Work Plan No. NIM-06, Amendment No. N/A
Facility Name: Magna Mart (to be Drink Shop)
Address: 8588 West 2700 South, Magna, Utah
Facility ID No.: 4000122
Release ID: NIM ("Release")
Owner/Operator, responsible party, or other person seeking PST Trust Fund Reimbursement: Alan
Jenkins, Environmental Contractors, Inc. ("Claimant")
Utah-Certified UST Consultant: William Moore, of Pure Enviro Management LLC ("Contractor")
In submitting Work Plan NIM-06 and amendments thereto for the above referenced Release NIM for
approval, the Claimant and the Contractor collectively, the "Parties," represent and agree to the
following:
Definitions:
"Contractor" means the person identified as such above.
"Claimant" means the person identified as such above.
“Parties” means Claimant and Contractor.
"Division Director" means the Division Director of the Division of Environmental Response and
Remediation.
“PST Fund" means the Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund.
"Release" means the release identified above.
"State" means the State of Utah including its agencies, officers, employees, volunteers and specifically,
the Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR), the Division Director of the
Division or Environmental Response and Remediation, and the Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund.
"Work Plan" means the work plan identified above.
1.The key personnel, for which qualifications are submitted under R311-207-3(c), are: William
Moore, CC#252, as Utah Certified Consultant, and GS#62, as Utah Certified Sampler.
2.The Claimant acknowledges that the Claimant is required to obtain a payment bond from the
Contractor under Section 14-2-1 of the Utah Code. If the Claimant fails to do so, the Claimant is
liable to each person who performed labor or services or supplied equipment or materials
("Subcontractors") in the event the Contractor does not pay the subcontractors, even if the Claimant
has paid the Contractor (Utah Code Section 14-2-2). The Claimant acknowledges and agrees that the
PST Fund will not reimburse the Claimant for such Subcontractors’ claims for payment against the
Claimant if the PST Fund has already made payment to the Claimant or Contractor. The Claimant
understands that the premium paid for a payment bond is reimbursable. Therefore, the Claimant:
a.Has required the Contractor to obtain 100 percent payment bond through a United States
Treasury-listed bonding company, and attached a copy, or;
b.Has obtained other equivalent assurance and waives all claims and remedies against the
State if the equivalent assurance does not adequately protect the Claimant.
The equivalent assurance is described as follows: Direct Payment to the Consultant from
the PST Fund has been authorized.
3. The Parties agree that the Contractor shall have no cause of action against the State for payment.
The Parties acknowledge and agree that the State is not a party to any contract with the Claimant or
the Contractor for reimbursement from the PST Fund in the execution of this Work Plan, except to
the extent provided by a contract signed by the Division Director. Instead, the Claimant’s
reimbursement is governed by the Utah Underground Storage Tank Act and the Utah Underground
Storage Tank Rules. The Contractor is entitled to reimbursement solely under his/her contract with
the Claimant.
4. The Parties agree that they will use a subcontracting method consistent with the requirements of
R311-207.
5. The Parties agree that, as a condition of performing the work under the work plan, the Contractor
shall carry the insurance specified in R311-207-3(c)(4). The Contractor represents that the
Certificate of Insurance documenting the required insurance is attached or that a current certificate is
on file with the Division Director and has been provided to the Claimant. The Parties assume the
risk and responsibility of ensuring that the appropriate insurance coverage is in place.
6. The Parties agree that payments from the PST Trust Fund shall be limited to amounts that are
customary, legitimate, reasonable and consistent with R311-207. Unless the Parties and the Division
Director have entered into a written Pay-for-Performance agreement, the Parties acknowledge that
payments will be for actual time and materials expended up to, but not exceeding, the amount of the
Division Director approved work plan and Division Director approved change orders, if any.
7. The Parties shall maintain financial and operation records in sufficient detail to document all
transactions relating to PST Fund reimbursement for the execution of this work plan. The Parties
shall make available for audit and inspection all such records relating to the completion of the work
plan and related services, requirements, and expenditures until all audits initiated by State auditors
are completed, or for a period of five years from the date of PST Fund reimbursement related to the
execution of this work plan. Records which relate to disputes, litigation, or the settlement of claims
arising out of the performance of this work plan, or to cost and expenses of this work plan as to
which exception has been taken by the Division Director, shall be retained by the Parties until
disposition has been made of such disputes, litigation, claims, or exceptions.
8.The Parties certify that there is a contract between the Claimant and the Contractor for the
performance of work under the work plan for which approval is sought ("Contract") and incorporate
the provisions herein into that Contract. To the extent that the Contract or amendments thereto
conflict with any provisions herein, the provisions herein govern. The Parties shall provide the
Contract to the Division Director upon request.
9.The Division Director is a third party beneficiary of this Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund Work
Plan Approval Application and Agreement and may enforce its provisions.
10.This Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund Work Plan Approval Application and Agreement does not
limit the Division Director’s rights and remedies under applicable law.
Contractor________________________________ William Moore, PG, CC#252, PEM
Signature, Printed Name, and Date
Claimant__________________________________ Alan Jenkins, ECI
Signature, Printed Name, and Date
09/20/24
Alan Jenkins (Sep 23, 2024 09:15 MDT)
Alan Jenkins 09/20/24

Environmental | Construction | Management 1594 South 1300 East T: 801-225-4646
Spanish Fork | UT 84660 W: pureenviro.com
WORK PLAN NIM-06 RESUBMITTAL
CONSTRUCTION TO SALT LAKE COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS TO BE
SPLIT BY OWNER AND PST FUND,
ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION WITH INSTALLATION OF 5
REPLACEMENT AND 2 NEW MW’S,
& ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PLAN.

Submitted To:
Nicole Chavez, State Project Manager
Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4840

Facility:
Magna Mart (to be Drink Shop A/P# 000335)
8588 W Main
Magna, Utah
Facility ID # 4000122
Leak ID # NIM

Dear Ms. Chavez:

On behalf of Alan Jenkins, Owner, Pure Enviro Management (PEM) is resubmitting the following work
plan for construction required for the Salt Lake County Building Permits, requiring installation of a
stormwater retention system hooked to the County storm water lines, removal of the canopy, and sloping
of the surface to properly drain the areas to the retentions system, with some landscaping to adsorb excess
stormwater. The attached itemized bid from Direct Push splits out the PST covered portions, and the
Owner covered portions of the construction part of the project. It will then be followed by, once the
cement is set enough to support the weight, replacement of 5 monitoring wells that were removed during
over excavation, with addition of two new monitoring wells off-site, followed by, groundwater sampling
of all 14 monitoring wells that will be associated with the referenced site. The work is proposed to be
completed under Work Plan NIM-06.

Background
There are currently twelve monitoring wells that were drilled for this site, only seven of which remain
after over excavation (MW-3, MW-6, MW-8, MW-9, MW-1, MW-11, MW-12). The Request For Work
Plan & Budget requires a Building Permit from Salt Lake County, P#000335, with Engineering and
Landscape Plans approved, we have yet to pay the Salt Lake County Engineering review Fee of $1912.73,
and Salt Lake County Performance Bond Fee of $100.00, and the cost of the Performance Bond to cover
$42,605.00 in the Bond Agreement (see permit attachment). I suggested that the Owner, Alan Jenkins,
pay these fees and obtains the bond, and then gets reimbursed for around to the 50% level I had proposed
in the last meeting with DERR on August 6th, 2024, at DERR as both PST and Owner portions are
required to get the work done.

Tasks

The objective of the work plan would be achieved by performance of the following tasks:

1. Task 1: Preparation of this work plan for the required Salt Lake County significant Construction

Environmental | Construction | Management 1594 South 1300 East T: 801-225-4646
Spanish Fork | UT 84660 W: pureenviro.com
as required, install 5 replacement MW’s and 2 new MW’ s off-site, and to then Sample
Groundwater in all 14 MWs for Contaminants of Concern (COC). This is all contained in this one
work plan and budget which is essentially three different categories in the consultant’s manual,
but since the disapproved NIM-05 Work Plan & Budget was paid to PEM, only the additional
hours required to re-submit the Work Plan & Budget as NIM-06 are being proposed.

2. Task 2: Construction Bonding and Permits with Salt Lake County. The Permits were required by
Salt Lake County (County) after ECI initially tried to get a permit with minimal work. The
County required Engineering Plan, & Landscape Plans that I have budgeted in to get re-imbursed
as a County requirement, a County Engineering Review Fee, a Bonding Fee, and a Performance
Bond to cover $42,505.00 of the costs. Since Direct Push Services LLC (here in referred to as
“Direct Push” has agreed to be paid for by the two separate sources as split out by their itemized
Bid, I proposed that the most responsible party is the owner, Alan Jenkins, to obtain the bonding
with PEM assistance, and pay the fees. PEM will then obtain the Proof of Payments and submit to
the State for the PST fund to reimburse the owner directly for the agreed upon percentages. Since
Pure Enviro Management LLC (PEM), is also a general contractor and will be Primary on the
construction we need to ensure through inspections of the project proper safety plans are in place,
and act as the construction superintendent, site safety officer, quality control officer all in one for
all the PST covered construction side and as a Utah Certified UST Consultant to the State DERR,
for the work being performed. At the end of this Task PEM will submit a Request for Payment
Voucher (RFPV) for both the Owner and PEM for the work performed up to this point to pay all
the fee and bonding issues.

3. Task 3: Construction. This task includes PEM acting at the Primary on the construction we need
to ensure through inspections of the project proper safety plans are in place, and act as the
construction superintendent, site safety officer, quality control officer all in one for our
construction side and as a Utah Certified UST Consultant to the State DERR, for the work being
performed. At least daily tailgate meetings will be held, weekly safety inspections, daily logs of
progress, along with any other OSHA requirements run into, will be input into PEM’s Procore
software and reports generated as needed. PEM already has these inspection forms in Procore that
we use on Federal and State construction projects. The Construction Schedule, see attached email
from Direct Push, is estimated to take place over about 6.3 work weeks, but may be completed
sooner. PEM actual time charged will be for only that spent going to, from, and on-site during the
PST covered portions and is estimated in the Budget. This schedule can shift based on the
subcontractor and acquisition of material requirements.

Three bids were obtained based on the Engineering and Landscape Plans approved by the
County, with the addition of the County requirements put in as part of their permit. The plans
included an option for asphalt or concrete from the county, however, the owner preferred the
replacement of what was previously there which was concrete. As discussed during our August
6th, 2024, meeting, it was agreed to continue with the winning bidder from WP&B NIM-05 but
allowing a 3-4% cost of li ving increase due to delayed schedule. This would increase the winning
construction bidder Direct Push Services LLC to $266,240.00; however, they now have given a
breakdown for the PST portion of $212,160.00, including the 4% cost of living increase, by
percentage, of $8,160.00. Direct Push will be set up as direct pay for the PST portion, and the
owner will have to pay them directly for his portion. Two bids were obtained for Private Locator
services that we’ll need prior to construction and prior to drilling, and I suggest Earthview as the
winning bidder. Public locator services will be used for all public utilities within the property
boundary.

Environmental | Construction | Management 1594 South 1300 East T: 801-225-4646
Spanish Fork | UT 84660 W: pureenviro.com

During on-site with the subcontractors, it was noticed that MW-8 had the lid broken off the well
can and will need to be replaced. In obtaining the bids Direct Push Services LLC proposed to
cover that cost within an amended total drilling bid, which was still under both other company’s
bids.

During excavation, some soil may be exposed for which a decision will need to be made as to
leave it in place or properly disposed of. This may require additional soil sampling to properly
dispose of soil or even to make the determination. Since PEM will already be on-site, it may
require additional sampling materials, and laboratory analysis. Traffic safety is always a concern,
and PEM will provide candle stick cones and flagging tape to block off traffic from the site for
the entire duration.

4. Task 4: Additional Subsurface Investigation. This will entail obtaining access to the two new off-
site well properties with property access agreements before drilling begins. This will also require
Permits from Utah Division of Water Rights (DWR) for each well, documenting to them the
wells that were removed and to be replaced, in addition to Blue Stake, and a Private Locator
Service to clear the proposed monitoring well locations. Again, of the two bids obtained
Earthview is the recommended winning bidder. The bids were obtained from three companies for
drilling the monitoring wells. The bid specification is attached. The winning bidder is proposed to
be Direct Push Service’s LLC with a bid of $13,669.00. It was proposed that during drilling of the
replacement monitoring wells no soil samples or geo-log needs to be kept as it should be fill-
material below all those locations. Soil Samples and a geo-log will be provided by PEM PG for
the two new wells, with at least three soil samples per monitoring well. All amounts in NIM-05
are still valid unless they tell us otherwise.

Drilling logs and final completion will be provided by the driller to DWR and PEM. The driller
will develop and complete the Monitoring Wells as part of their bid. See Bid Specifications. PEM
will provide those logs and the Geo-logs for the two new monitoring wells in a report to the State
Project Manager. At this point PEM will complete additional RFPV to get the driller, Locator,
and PEM paid up to date. Direct Push Services LLC will be set up as direct payment for their PST
portion.

5. Task 5: Additional Groundwater Sampling. PEM will measure the groundwater surface below
top of casing (TOC) with a Heron meter for contour maps for water levels, total depth, estimate
silting and calculate purge volumes. All estimated wells are shown in ECI Site Map, June 30,
2020. According to ECI the actual map and data were lost when their hard disk crashed. So, a
new base map will need to be created, re-verify all monitoring well locations, in additional to the
new monitoring wells and the new curb and gutter configuration, so contour maps can be
provided.

Two bids were obtained to create the base map as it was expected to cost over $1K. The winning
bidder is suggested as Johnson Engineering Inc. as they have worked with PEM in the past and
are good at maintaining the Base Map to minimize additional costs in the future. In addition, after
the initial Contour Map, future contour maps will cost less to produce.

Purge all monitoring wells with sufficient purge volume of at least 2 gallons with Geo-reel and
Geosub controller, DC/AD converter, powered with a 12-volt battery. If wells are purged dry,
allow them to sit for recharge as other wells are measured or sampled.

Environmental | Construction | Management 1594 South 1300 East T: 801-225-4646
Spanish Fork | UT 84660 W: pureenviro.com

Sample all wells that have sufficient purge volume with Geo-reel and Geosub Controller at end of
purge for 8260(MBTEXN and TPH-GRO) and 8015(TPH-DRO) and put samples on ice. Use
bailers to sample any well with insufficient purge volume, as a no-purge sampling to try to get
enough sample for 8260 and 8015. Must be prepared to do either type of sampling depending on
amount of water found in wells with either the pump system or bailers and a roll of twine per
well.

Following completion of the above task and receipt of analysis under standard priority, full tables
and a report will be developed presenting the results of the sampling. Regardless, a contour map
for those wells we can get data for will be prepared by Johnson Engineering Inc. and included in
the report with limitations based on the data found. Recommendations or options will also be
presented in the report by the Professional Geologist / Certified Consultant.

Schedule for Completion of Work

The work described in this plan will be scheduled for spring 2024 (the construction schedule indicates 6.3
weeks for construction, a week or two for concrete setting to enable a rig to access the property, followed
by 1 to 2 days for drilling, well development and completion, followed by 1 – 2 days sampling and
monitoring, and upon WP&B approval.

Cost Estimate

The estimated cost to complete the proposed scope of work is $281,617.02, a detailed breakdown of the
cost is in Table 1.

This cost estimate is based on the estimate from the subcontractor for construction, and typical times and
conditions for drilling and sampling wells that are 20 feet in depth. If unexpected conditions are
encountered, or if additional samples are required, then additional charges would apply. No additional
work would be done without prior approval by the State PM.

If you have questions or comments relating to this information, please contact William Moore, at
801-971-3242.

Sincerely,

William Moore, PG, CC#252
Pure Enviro Management LLC

Attachments: Petroleum Storage Tank Trust Fund Work Plan Approval Application and Agreement for
Work Plan # NIM-06

cc: Alan Jenkins, ECI
TASK 1: WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
Labor
Hours Title Code Description Rate Total Actual Hr Actual Costs
0.25 Principal 100 Budget Approval $153.00 $38.25
2 Certified Consulta 101 Obtain Construction Bids $138.00 $276.00
4 Project Geologist 103 Work Plan/Schedule $107.00 $428.00
1 Clerical 109
Document Preparation,
Quotes, Construction
Contracts $56.00 $56.00
Subtotal:$798.25
Additional Subsurface Investiga NTE $1,000.00
Additional Groundwater Sampl NTE $650.00
Re-Submit Task 1 Total:$798.25
Labor
Hours Title Code Description Rate Total
PST Actual
Hr
PST Actual
Costs
2 Certifed
Consultant 101 Obtain Bond with County $138.00 $276.00
2 Clerical 109 Obtain Bond with County $56.00 $112.00
1 Project Geologist 102 Blue Stakes $133.00 $133.00
5 Project Geologist 102 Private Utilities Locate (On-
site with locator& travel)$133.00 $665.00
2 PST Fund
Specialist 108 Claims Processing $81.00 $162.00
Task 2 Subtotal Labor $1,348.00
Table 1
Cost Estimate For:
Drink Shop (Former Magna Mart)
8588 West Main St., Magna, Utah
Facility ID No. 4000122, Release ID NIM-06
TASK 2: CONSTRUCTION BONDING & PERMITS
Other Direct
Costs
Item Quantity Unit Rate Total
Fee
RB&G
Engineering 1 Engineering Plans to County
Minimums
50% of
$12,115.00 $6,057.50
Fee Landcurve 1 Landscape Plans
50% of
$2,500.00 $1,250.00
Fee
Salt Lake County
Bond 1 Performance Bond Fee
50% of
$100.00 $50.00
Fee
Salt Lake County
Bond 1 Performance Bond for
$42,505.00
50% of est.
$500.00 $250.00
Fee Salt Lake County Engineering Reivew Fee
50% of
$1,912.73 $956.37
NTE Project Geologist 102 Initial Health and Safety Plan $400.00 $400.00 NTE
Mileage 16 mi @ 24 min/way+10 42 Miles 0.67 $28.14
Task 2 Subtotal ODC:$8,035.64
Task 2 Total :$9,383.64
Labor
Hours Title Code Description Rate Total Actual Hr Actual Costs
216 Construction
Superintendent,
Site Safety
Officer, Certifed
Consultant 101
Construction Superintendent,
Site Safety Officer, Certified
Consultant Oversight (3-4 hats
completing daily contruction
logs, weekly safety
inspections, construction and
safety oversight) including
travel time.
$138.00 $29,808.00
1 Clerical 109 Verify Bond with County $56.00 $56.00
TASK 3: CONSTRUCTION
2 PST Fund
Specialist 108 Claims Processing $71.00 $142.00
Task 3 Subtotal Labor:$30,006.00
Subcontractor
Forefront GC
Bid
Bid based on SL County
requirements, as with
approved plans from RG&G
and Landcurve plans
$306,565.89
Asphalt;
$399,579.97
Cement
Biorgre
Contractors
Bid
Bid based on SL County
requirements, as with
approved plans from RG&G
and Landcurve plans
$329,149.51
Asphalt
Direct Push
Services LLC
Bid
Bid based on SL County
requirements, as with
approved plans from RG&G
and Landcurve plans
PST Portion of
$266,240.00 $212,160.00
Laboratory CTFL 2 Soil Analysis (8260, 8015)$85.00 $170.00
Private Locator Earthview 1 Bid $425.00 $425.00
GPRS 1 Bid $1,025.00
Task 3 Subtotal Subcontractor: $213,180.00
Other Direct
Costs
Item Quantity Unit Rate Total
PEM Sampling
Supplies 6
If needed for contaminated
soils needing disposal
$25/d-
$100/wk $600.00
PEM Traffic Safety 6 $15/d-$60/wk $360.00
Mileage 16 mi @ 24 min/way+10 1290 Miles 0.67 $864.30
Ea
MW Flush Mount 1
replace broken Well Can.
Direct Push added to Base Bid.Included $0.00
Ea Full Size Plans 1 ea Estimated $100.00
Task 3 Subtotal ODC: $1,924.30
Task 3 Total:$245,110.30
Labor
Hours Title Code Description Rate Total Actual Hr Actual Costs
2 ea NTE Property Access Agreement $100.00 $200.00
2 Project Manager 103 Well Permits $107.00 $214.00
1 Project Manager 103 Utility Clearance $107.00 $107.00
23
Project Manager
103
GPR Clearance, Drill, GeoLog,
Sample (2hr.supplies, 4 hr
GPR, 16 hr. Drill, 2 hr Travel
for 2 days)$107.00 $2,461.00
Drilling Report
0.5 Principal Geologis 101 Report Review Approval $138.00 $69.00
1 Professional Geolo 102 Report Technical Review $133.00 $133.00
4.75 Project Geologist 103 Report Preparation $107.00 $508.25
4 Field Geologist 104 Data compilation $92.00 $368.00
2 Clerical 109
Document formatting &
Proofing $56.00 $112.00
2 PST Fund
Specialist 108 Claims Processing $71.00 $142.00
Task 4 Subtotal Labor:$4,314.25
Subcontractor
Driller Conetec 1 Bid $37,040.33
Earthcore 1 Bid $23,380.00
Direct Push
Serivces, LLC 1 Bid modified to include MW#8 Well Can $13,669.00 $13,669.00
TASK 4: ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION- DRILLING (Clearance, Drill, Geo Log, & Soil Sample, report)
GPR Earthview 1 Bid $270.00 $270.00
GPRS 1 Bid $600.00
Laboratory CTFL 6 Soil Analysis (8260, 8015)
3/well $85.00 $510.00
Task 4 Subtotal Subcontractor:$14,449.00
Other Direct Costs
Item Quantity Unit Rate Total
Rental PID meter (soil
gas bag samples)2 day $95 $190
PEM Water Level
Meter 2 day $25 $50
PEM Sampling
Supplies 2 day $25 $50
PEM Traffic Safety 2 day $15 $30
Mileage 16 mi @ 24 min/way+10 74 Miles 0.67 $41.44
Task 4 Subtotal Other:$361.44
Task 4 Total:$19,124.69
Task 5: Additional GW Sampling (Contour Survey and Water Sampling) after new wells developed.
Labor
Hours Title Code Description Rate Total
2 Project Geologist 103 Project Management & logs $107.00 $214.00
1.45 Project Geologist 103 Travel 0.24 hr./each way home + Pickups 0. $107.00 $155.15
2 Technician 106 Travel 1 hr./each way home/office $66.00 $132.00
7 Project Geologist 103 Measure & Sample (1 days GW) $107.00 $749.00
7 Technician 106 Measure & Sample 1 day GW $66.00 $462.00
2 PST Claims Proces 108
Claims Processing - Scan receipts
submit RFPV $71.00 $142.00
Task 5 Subtotal Labor:$1,854.15
Subcontractors
Item Quantity Unit Rate Total
1 Base Map initial $1,000.00 $1,000.00
1 GW Contour Map initial $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Subtotal JE:$2,000.00
CTFL
Water Analysis
(8260 & 8015)14 $85.00 $1,190.00
Subtotal CTFL $1,190.00
Task 5 Subtotal Subcontractor:$3,190.00
Other Direct Costs
Item Quantity Unit Rate Total
Water Level Indicator (PEM)1 $25day/$75wk $25.00 $25.00
0 $55day/$165wk $55.00 $0.00
Purge&Sampling Pump (PEM)see below
Geosub controller 2 $40day/$120wk $40.00 $80.00
Georeel 150'2 $80day/$200w,$80.00 $160.00
DC/AC Converter 2 $5day/$10wk $5.00 $10.00
Bailer (weighted) if needed for no purg 0 ea.$11.00 $0.00
Roll of Nylon Mason String (white)0 ea.$8.95 $0.00
Portable Generator Rental (HomeDe 0 $56 Day/ $224wk 2000 W $224.00 $0.00
Generator Fuel 0 gallons $4.00 $0.00
PID Rental (for Soil Gas bag samples)0 Week (expect 0 day drilling)$240.00 $0.00
Tubing 420 Ft $0.50 $210.00
Traffic Safety Equipment 2 $15 day/$60wk $15.00 $30.00
Misc Sampling Equipment 2 $25day/ $100wk (1 day GW
sampling)
$25.00 $50.00
Mileage 30 mi way for Tech+10 m 72 miles $0.67 $48.24
Task 5 Subtotal ODC:$613.24
Oil/Water Interface Probe >135'
PLS of elevations of 14 MW's TOC's to
provide and provide the Groundwater
Contour Map from the Data provided
by PEM once obtained.
Professional Land Surveyor (PLS) Survey
Grade Topographic Map by field survey to
correlate old ECI map for new aerial Base
Map for PEM once the new wells are
installed and maintain the map for future
contour maps or additions.
Sampling Report Preparation
Labor
Hours Title Code Description Rate Total
0.5 Principal Geologis 101 Report Review Approval $138.00 $69.00
1 Professional Geolo 102 Report Technical Review $133.00 $133.00
8.75 Project Geologist 103 Report Preparation $107.00 $936.25
1 Field Scientist 104 Data Table compilation $92.00 $92.00
0.5 Drafter 107
Table prep for Subcontractor PE
Contour Map $77.00 $38.50
2 Clerical 109 Document Formatting & Proofi $56.00 $112.00
2 PST Claims Proces 121
Claims Processing - total, collate,
get signatures and submit $81.00 $162.00
Task 5 Subtotal Labor Samplng Report:$1,542.75
Task 5 Total:$7,200.14
Grand TOTAL:$281,617.02
20-1339913 | www.directpushservices.com
Direct Push Services LLC
PO Box 25784
Salt Lake City, UT 84125
[phone]
[e-mail]
Estimate
ADDRESS
Pure Enviro Management
LLC
1422 E 820 N
Orem, UT 84097
ESTIMATE #240052
DATE 09/12/2024
EXPIRATION DATE 10/12/2024

P.O. NUMBER SALES REP
Magna Mart site work Chad Russell
DATE ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
Task 1. Reinstall and reconnect to the Storm Catch
Basin Drain Box with a prefabricated drain box as
itemized in the Engineering Drawings from RB&G
November 2022, with bicycle safe grate and at the
specified depth to work with the R-Tank System. This
and the reconnection to the R-Tank System is covered
by the PST Fund.
1 56,000.00 56,000.00
Task 2. The R-Tank System excavation, surveyed
leveling depth, the R-Tank itself, the clean-out-box, with
connection pipe, and backfill and landscape above the R-
Tank will NOT be covered by the State PST Fund, but
will be an expense on the owner to get the Building
Permit.
1 30,000.00 30,000.00
Task 3. The Reinstallation of Curb and Gutter as
spelled out in the Engineering Plans to re-align the
Buccaneer Drive street curb with the County
Requirements is covered by the State PST Fund.
1 50,000.00 50,000.00
Task 4. The removal of the Canopy, and footings, and
replacing cement torn out beneath the canopy will be an
expense on the owner to get the Building Permit and
NOT covered by the PST Fund.
1 12,000.00 12,000.00
Task 5. The removal of the cement in the Landscape
areas and the landscape itself will be at the expense of
the owner and NOT covered by the PST Fund, however,
the cement cutting needed to separate those areas off
from the cement to be replaced should be covered.
**Cutting of the cement would be $2000 of this line item**
1 12,000.00 12,000.00
Task 6. The leveling, re-compaction, of the areas
disturbed by the over-excavation around most of the
building, and re-cementing with Cement draining toward
the pre-Fab Storm Catch Basin Drain Box, to replace
what was removed, is covered by the State PST Fund.
1 96,000.00 96,000.00
20-1339913 | www.directpushservices.com
DATE ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
**Add 3-4% cost of living increase to the overall bid.256,000 0.04 10,240.00
Does not include site engineering, site SWPPP (other
than standard requirements as shown on the drawings),
or permits other than what would be needed for the
canopy demo/storm drain installation.

Thank you for the bidding opportunity. Please call me with any
questions regarding this estimate.
TOTAL $266,240.00
Accepted By Accepted Date
William Moore <[e-mail]>
4000122 NIM Magna Mart (to be Drink Shop)
Chad Russel <[e-mail]>Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:22 PM
To: William Moore <[e-mail]>
Bill,
The schedule would be as follows:
Task 1: 10 working days
Task 2: 5 working days
Task 3: 9 working days
Task 4: 4 working days
Task 5: 4 working days
Task 6: 8 working days
Some of the days would overlap one another, and there would be some of the tasks that would have gaps between them for concrete pour preps, etc, but that’s generally what I’m thinking. Thanks!
Chad Russell
Direct Push Services,LLC
801-372-3587
On Sep 12, 2024, at 12:48 PM, William Moore <[e-mail]> wrote:
[Quoted text hidden]
2024-09-19.4000122.NIM-06.Work Plan
Approval Application and Agreement.collated
Final Audit Report 2024-09-23
Created:2024-09-19
By:William Moore ([e-mail])
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAA9Te_oglove6MvRiMOjvWWR2Cp0S9uYkJ
"2024-09-19.4000122.NIM-06.Work Plan Approval Application a
nd Agreement.collated" History
Document created by William Moore ([e-mail])
2024-09-19 - 11:41:57 PM GMT
Document emailed to Alan Jenkins ([e-mail]) for signature
2024-09-19 - 11:42:03 PM GMT
Document emailed to William Moore ([e-mail]) for signature
2024-09-19 - 11:42:03 PM GMT
Email viewed by William Moore ([e-mail])
2024-09-20 - 6:59:52 PM GMT
Document e-signed by William Moore ([e-mail])
Signature Date: 2024-09-20 - 7:00:48 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Email viewed by Alan Jenkins ([e-mail])
2024-09-23 - 3:13:35 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Alan Jenkins ([e-mail])
Signature Date: 2024-09-23 - 3:15:16 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2024-09-23 - 3:15:16 PM GMT