DAQ-2024-010472

1

DAQC-966-24
Site ID 10335 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: September 25, 2024

SUBJECT: Location: 474 West 900 North, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
Contact: Morgan Sites – 801-366-2046
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Sources: Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS), East
Cogeneration Unit (CG1), and West Cogeneration Unit (CG2)
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500004
Permit# AO DAQE-AN0103350075-18 dated January 11, 2018
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated September 18, 2024

On September 19, 2024, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of the
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company’s FCCU WGS, CG1, and CG2 located in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Testing will be performed on November 19-21, 2024, to determine compliance with the emission limits
found in AO Condition II.B.7.a.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK
3. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK
4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK
5. RM 5/202 used to determine PM emissions: OK
6. RM 7E used to determine NOx emissions: OK
DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Send protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

ATTACHMENTS: Stack testing protocol.

6 , 3
salt Lake city Refinery
474 West 900 North
salt Lake city, uT 84103-1494
^i\E..ngy"
September 18,2024
Mr. Paul Morris
Division of Air Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144820
Salt Lake ciry, uT 84114-4820
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company's
Salt Lake City Refinery
FCCU WGS PM Emission Test
Cogen NOx Emission Test
Dear Mr. Morris:
{{r,{r&H:
Morgan Sites
Environmental Professional
Enclosed
Tesoro Refining &
Marketing Company LLG
A subsidiary of Marathon Petroleum Corporation
Hand Submittal
Enclosed please find the protocol for the 2024 PM Emission Test for the Fluid Catalytic
Cracking Unit (FCCU) Wet Gas Scrubber (WGS), and the 2024 NOx Emission Test for
the Cogeneration Unit scheduled for the week of November l8th, 2024..
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
wen oepnniuEffi
sEP 1 I 2024'fiqrt a delrlercd
At6rrc
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2210 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Site Specific Test Plan
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Sources to be Tested: Wet Gas Scrubber &
East and West Cogen
Proposed Test Dates: November 19-21,2024
Project No. AST-2024-41 17
pdlldrpe
IECHt.t I AI GR i,.r I )Site Specific Test Plan
Test Prosram Summarv
Requlatory lnformation
Permit No.
Source Information
DAQE-AN 103350075- l8
Source Name
FCCU WGS
East Cogeneration Unit
West Cogeneration Unit
Contact Information
Source ID
PS#4
CGI
CG2
Target Paramelers
PM, PM2.5, PMIO
NOx
NOx
Tesl Localion
Tesoro Refining and Marketing
Company
Salt Lake City Refinery
474 West 900 North
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Facility Contact
Morgan Sites
msites@marathonpetroleum. com
[phone]
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
2700 NE Burton Rd., Suite A
Vancouver, WA 98662
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Ryan Lyons
ryan. lyon [e-mail]
[phone]
(subject to change)
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie.shonk@al I iancetg.com
(8t2) 4s2-478s
Test Plan /Report Coordinator
Lisa Simonik
[e-mail]
[phone]
A nalytical Laboratories
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
5530 Marshall Street
Arvada, CO 80002
Eric Grosjean
eric.grosjean@al liancetg.com
[phone]
Particle Technology Labs
555 Rogers St. #4
Downers Grove, IL 60515
Aubrey Montana
[e-mail]
[phone]
Regulatory Agency
Utah Department of
Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality (UDAQ)
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake Ciry, UT 841l4
(80r) s36-4400
MPC - Salt Lake City, UTAST-2024-4 I I 7
pulErrpe)
ill.ti{-.4 _. ii (_) i J i-)
Site Specific Test Plan
Table ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Process/Control System Descriptions.. ................ l-l
2.0 Summary of Test Program ............2-1
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded ............... .....................2-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate........3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide.... ........... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content......... .......................3-2
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and 202 - Total Particulate Matter........... ..................3-2
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A ............. ....... 3-3
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3.A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide......... ......... 3-3
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides ......... 3-3
3.8 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors ..................... 3-3
3.9 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. ....................... 3-3
3.10 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E...........................3-4
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-l: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ......................2-2
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix
Appendix
A
B
Method I Data
Example Field Data Sheets
AST-202.1-.1I I 7
3 of36
Page iiMPC - Salt t-ake City. UT
AI
T l a !1 i\.1 I (1. r\
FralEe
i a; n () tl P
Site Specrfic Test Plan
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) to conduct
compliance testing at the Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) Salt Lake City, Utah refinery. Portions
of the facility are subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality
(UDAQ) Permit No. DAQE-AN103350075-18. Testing will be conducted to determine the emission rates of the
emission rates of particulate matter (PM), particulate matter less than l0 microns (PMl0) and particulate matter less
than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) from the exhaust of the Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) Belco Wet Gas
Scrubber (WGS) Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) for the PMl0 Cap calculation per the annual requirement detailed
in the UDAQ permit. Additionally, testing will be conducted to determine the emission rates of nitrogen oxides
(NOx) at the exhausts of the fwo (2) cogeneration trains designated as East Cogen (CG I ) and West Cogen (CC2).
The data collected during the testing program will be used to determine the correct emission factor for the East and
West Cogen unit's NOx Cap calculation per the biennial requirement detailed in the UDAQ permit
This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of the
UDAQ permit.
1.1 Process/ControlSystemDescriptions
The FCCU Regenerator / Carbon Monoxide Boiler (Heat Recovery Unit) is equipped with CONOX oxygen
injection, ammonia injection, and an ESP/LoTOx (WGS) system for emission controls. Emissions are exhausted
through one ( I ) stack designated as PS#4.
The Cogeneration Unit consists of two (2) cogeneration trains (CGl and CG2), each has a ll.8 MW (based on
annual average) turbine with SoLoNOx controls and one heat recovery steam generating (HRSG) unit rated at
approximately 157.8 MMBtu,/hr (HHV). The units may be fired on plant & natural gas.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-l: Project Team
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock
corded lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with
Client and Alliance's safety policies.
A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.
MPC - Salt Lake City, UT
Facility Personnel Morgan Sites
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel Ryan Lyons
other field personnel assigned at time oftesting event
AST-2021-4 I l 7
4 ol36
pul6rrpE)
T E C 11 N lai A t ,3 R O l.l P Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Programs
2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satis$ the requirements of the UDAQ permit, the facility will conduct a performance test program to determine
the compliance status of the FCCU WGS ESP and the East Cogen (CGl) and West Cogen (CG2).
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1,2,
313A,3A, 4,5,7E, 19, and 202. Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing
program. The following is a summary of the test objectives.
Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ permit.
Emissions testing will be conducted on the exhaust of FCCU and the East Cogen (CGl) and West Cogen
(cG2).
Each of the three (3) test runs will be approximately 60 minutes in duration.
If the stack gas temperature is less than 85"F at the time of testing, total particulate matter will be measured
using U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 17 or modified U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 5 with an
unheated sample system.
NOx mass emission rates in units of pounds per hour (lb/hr) will be calculated from fuel use during the test
runs.
NOx emissions in pounds per million British thermal units (lb,&lMBtu) will be determined with EPA
Method l9 calculations using an Fd value calculated from a fuel analysis provided by Tesoro for each run.
The data collected during the testing program will be used to determine the correct emission factor for the
East and West Cogen unit's NOx Cap calculation per the biennial requirement detailed in the UDAQ
permit.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every l5 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:
FCCU WGS ESP
o Production/Throughput,lb,4rr
. Scrubber Flow Rate
o Fan Frequency
East Cosen (CG I ) and West Cogen (CG2)
. Fuel Analysis
o Fuel Consumption
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-l presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.
MPC - Salt Lake City, UT
a
a
a
a
AsT-2024-4 I I 7
5 ol36
Page 2-l
AllElrceTECHNICAL GROUP Site Specific Test Plan
Summartt of Test P rosrams
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule
DAY I -November 18,2024
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 5hr
DAY2-November 19,2024
FCCU WGS ESP
VFR t-2
3 60 min l0 hr
Oz / COz 3
BWS 4
PM 51202
DAY3-November20,2024
East Cogen (CGl)
Oz/COz 3A
3 60 min 8hrNOx7E
lb/IvIMBtu l9
DAY4-November2l,2024
West Cogen (CG2)
Ozl COz 3A
3 60 min
8hrNOx7E
lb/TvIMBtu l9
DAY 5 -November 22,2024
Contingency Day (if needed)
2.4 Emission Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.
Teble 2-2: Emission Limits
AST-2024-41 l7 Page2-2MPC - Salt Lake City, UT
5 of35
AI
f E C lll'J lC A L ,-i Fl O ll i)Site Specific Test Plan
Summary ofTest Programs
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 60 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information. In addition to the final test report, the test results must be entered into the U.S. EPA
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) for submittal via CEDRI.
o lntroductior - Brief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
. Results and Discussion - A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
. Llethodologt - A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
t Sample Calculations - Example calculations for each target parameter.
c Field Dala - Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
. Laboratory Data - Copies of laboratory report(s) and chain ofcustody(s).
o Quality Control Data - Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
o Process Operating'Control System Data - Process operating and control system data (as provided by MPC)
to support the test results.
Fla
MPC - Salt Lake City, UT
7 o136
AST-202.1-4117 Page 2-3
Site Specific T'est Plan
'[ e s t i nq .l te t hoclo I og.t'
3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
All stack diameters. depths, widths. upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with an EPA Method I verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measurements will be included in the test report.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and dorvnstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-l in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
l.
Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure. static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings will be recorded during each test run. The data collected will
be utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 l-1.S. EPA Reference Test lllethod 3/3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (CO:) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3/3A. One (l) integrated Tedlarbag sample will be collected during each test run. The bag samples will be
analyzed on site with a gas analyzer. The remaining stack gas constituent will be assumed to be nitrogen for the
stack gas molecular weight determination. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
MI)C - Salt l-ake Crt [ ]'l
Peremeter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate I &.2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3 t3A Integrated Bag / Instrumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Cravimetric Analvsis
Total Particulate Matter 5t202 Isokinetic Sampling
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instrumental Analvsis
Mass Emission Factors l9 Fuel Factors / Heat Inputs
Cas Dilution System Certification 205
ASl--l()lt-.lt | 7
8 ol'36
l'agc .1- |
puIATEE)
I'EC}Ii\JiCA _i It o i.l i)Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodologt
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
condition ing train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a
knownquantityofwaterorsilicagel. Eachimpingerwill beanalyzedgravimetricallybeforeandaftereachtestrun
on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and 202 -Total Particulate Matter
The total particulate matter (filterable and condensable PM) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Methods 5 and202. The complete sampling system will consist of a glass nozzle, glass-lined probe,
pre-weighed quartz filter, coil condenser, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas conditioning train, pump and calibrated dry
gas meter. The gas conditioning train will consist of a coiled condenser and four (4) chilled impingers. The first
and second impingers will be initially empty, the third will contain 100 mL of de-ionized water and the last impinger
will contain 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter will be placed between the second
and third impingers. The probe liner heating system will be maintained at a temperature of 248 +25'F, and the
impinger temperature will be maintained at 68oF or less throughout testing. The temperature of the Teflon filter will
be maintained greater than 65oF but less than or equal to 85'F.
If the stack gas temperature is less than 85"F at the time of testing, total particulate matter will be measured using
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l7 or modified U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 5 with an unheated sample
system.
Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train will be leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than
or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. If condensate is collected in the first dry impinger,
then the front-half of the sample train (the nozzle, probe, and heated pre-weighed filter) will be removed in order to
purge the back-half of the sample train (coil condenser, first and second impingers and CPM filter). A glass bubbler
will be inserted into the first impinger. If needed, de-ionized ultra-filtered (DIUF) water will be added to the first
impinger to raise the water level above the bubbler, then the coil condenser will be replaced. Zero nitrogen will
connected to the condenser, and a 60-minute purge at l4 liters per minute will be conducted. Afterthe completion
of the nitrogen purge the impinger contents will be measured for moisture gain. The nitrogen purge will be omitted
if minimal condensate is collected in the dry impingers.
The pre-weighed quartz filter will be carefully removed and placed in container l. The probe, nozzle and front half
of the filter holder will be rinsed three (3) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate matter and these
rinses will be recovered in container 2. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport
to the identified laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis.
The contents of impingers I and 2 will be recovered in container CPM Cont. # 1 . The back half of the filterable PM
filter holder, the coil condenser, impingers I and,2 and all connecting glassware will be rinsed with DIUF water and
then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses will be added to container CPM Cont. #l while the
solvent rinses will be recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter will be removed from the filter holder
and placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder will be rinsed with DIUF
water and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse will be added to container CPM Cont. #l while
the solvent rinses will be added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels
marked for transport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis.
MPC - Salt Lake Cit_v, UT
9 ol36
AST-2024-4 I I 7 Page 3-2
Afanoe
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3/3A
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol | (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases will be
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute difference.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. Thedatawill becontinuouslystoredasa*.CSVfileinExcel formatontheharddriveofacomputer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 34 - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A'. Data will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system will consist
of a stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. lf an unheated
Teflon sample line is used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line will be used. The quality control measures are described in Section
3. 10.
3.7 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
will be collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system wilI consist of a stainless-steel
probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system
will be a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. lf an unheated Teflon sample line is
used, then a portable non-contact condenser will be placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a
heatedTeflonsamplelinewill beused. ThequalitycontrolmeasuresaredescribedinSection3.l0.
3.8 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors
The pollutant concentrations will be converted to mass emission factors (lb/MMBtu) using procedures outlined in
U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19. The calculated fuel factor (F-Factor) will be used in the calculations based on
the fuel gas analysis.
3.9 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method
205. Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates will be utilized to force the dilution system to perform two
dilutions on each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases will be sent directly to the analyzer, and the
analyzer response recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response must agree within 27o of the
actual diluted gas concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of
one ofthe gas divider settings described above, will be introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
MPC - Salt Lake Cit_v, UT
l0 ol36
AST-2024-,11 l7 Page 3-3
pilldrrcE)
Site Specrfic Test Plan
Testine lvlethodology-. H aj,ii:'
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response must agree within
2o/o. These steps will be repeated three (3) times.
3.10 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases will meet EPA Protocol | (+l- 2o/o) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates
will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
Low Level gas will be introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading is stable, the analyzer value will be recorded. This process will be
repeated for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases will be
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. The Calibration Error for each gas must be within 2.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration will be recorded. The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value, and this value
will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading
to decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) will be recorded. If the Low-
Level gas is zero gas, the acceptable response must be 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration or 0.5 ppm
(whichever was less restrictive). The analyzer reading will be observed until it reaches a stable value and this value
will be recorded. The measurement system response time and initial system bias will be determined from these data.
The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever is closer to the stack gas concentration) will be introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response is stable, the value will be recorded. Next, Low Level gas will be introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value will be recorded once it reaches a stable response. The System Bias for each gas must be within 5.0
percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference or the data is invalidated, and the Calibration Error
Test and System Bias must be repeated.
The Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias must be within 3% of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute
difference or the Calibration Error Test and System Bias must be repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check will be conducted prior to initiating testing.
The pollutant concentrations will be measured at twelve traverse points (as described in Method l) or three points
(16.7,50.0 and 83.3 percentof the measurement line). Each traverse point will be sampled for a minimum of twice
the system response time.
If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point do not differ more than 5%o or 0.5 ppm (whichever is less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling will be conducted during the test runs.
Ifthe pollutant concentration does not meet these specifications but differs less than l0% or 1.0 ppm from the
average concentration, then three (3) point sampling will be conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7,
50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters
from the stack wall). If the potlutant concentration differs by more than l07o or 1.0 ppm from the average
concentration, then sampling will be conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification
check data will be included in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix of the report.
MPC - Salt Lake Cit-v. UT
I I o136
AST-2024-4t t7 Page 3-4
put6rpe
TECIiI.JI(IA! GROIJP Site SpeciJic Test Plan
Testins Methodoloev
An NOz - NO converter check will be performed on the analyzer prior to initiating testing. An approximately 50
ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas will be introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response will
be recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response must be within +/- l0 percent of the cylinder
concentration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup will be used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. Thedatawill becontinuouslystoredasa*.CSVfileinExcel formatontheharddriveofacomputer. At
the completion of testing, the data will also be saved to the Alliance server. All data will be reviewed by the Field
Team Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data will be
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review will be performed by the Project Manager.
MPC - Salt Lake CityAST-2024-4 I I 7
AI Site Specific Test Plan
Quality Assurance P rogram
4.0 Quality Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment retuming from the field is inspected before it is
returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.
Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.
The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.
o Drv Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines
the meter correction factor (Y) and the meter's orifice pressure differential (AH@). Alliance uses approved
Altemative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5olo since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
o Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determinedfromawindtunnel calibration. Ifaspecificcoefficientfromawindtunnel calibrationhasbeen
obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration.
o Temperature Measurins Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a NlST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second NlST-traceable meter. NIST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
. Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
. Diqital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.
rla
MPC - Salt Lake City. UT
l3 ol36
AST-2024-41 l7 Page 4- I
pjlldrpe
Tl,Cllll lCi\r, n () i: lD Site Specific Test Plan
Quality Assurance P rogrom
Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within + 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out of service.
Balances and Weiehts. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
NIST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
Other Equipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer's Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
Iines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
. Cleaned glassware and sample train components will be sealed until assembly.
. Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
. Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
o The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
. Dry gas meter, AP, AH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
o An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-l l0% will be maintained, as applicable.
o All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
o All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
4.3 Analytical Laboratory
Analytical laboratory selection for sample analyses is based on the capabilities, certifications and accreditations that
the laboratory possesses. An approved analytical laboratory subcontractor list is maintained with a copy of the
certificate and analyte list as evidence of compliance. Alliance assumes responsibility to the client for the
subcontractor's work. Alliance maintains a verifiable copy of the results with chain of custody documentation.
NIPC - Salt Lake City. UT
l-l of 36
AST-202.+-41 I 7 Page.l-2
l5 of36
AilAtr-SOURCE TESTING
Lcaioo T6oro RellniEr - S.lt LrL. Ciry, UT
Method I Data
Sourcc FCCU B.l.o WGS (S0ck PS#r)
Dud Oriotraioo: vfrical
ouaooigr,ffi
Dittur. (rcm Fr Wdl to Ont.id. of Pon, --'iiii6'- ir
Nipple L6Irh: 9 00 itr
Dtpth of Dua, --lii6-io
cro!! Sdoad Arc. of Duo, ---iI?-6,
No. of Tst Poru:--T-
Dittrc Ar 15 0 n
Di.tue A Duct Dirm.., T(mu.r b. , 0.5)
Dirtre 8: 12 0 ft
DBruce B Drct Dr"mc^,T(.u.r mt z,
Mioitum Number of Tr.rcnc Point: ---ld-
Adud Nunbcr of Tr.tdc PoinB: 2.f
Number of Rsding! pc, Pointr ----1-
'xatnr-Lq-B-h
t
.rEbdA?tFd
ht-O.alr-.c.
!-I ,.-'-----l-
-tu
-rUl.Ar)
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nunba oJ ntws. pi^B il o rlio&a
I
3
{
5
6
1
t
9
l0
ll
l2
2 f .t s 6 1 t 9 to ll l7
14.6
E5 .t
67
25.0
7J0
o1'
.t .l
t.t.6
296
701
E5r
956
32
t0 5
l9l
323
617
t06
E9J
96t
76
E2
l{ 6
22.6
3{2
658
11 1
8J{
9l t
2l
6.7
ll8
t71
250
15 6
641
750
8:3
rE2
931
Trarcrs
Point
'/. oI
Di,fr{.r
Di.tuc.
fron inrid.
Dirtuca
from
ou$idc of
I
J
{
5
5
1
t
9
l0
u
t2
2t
61
il8
t11
250
t56
6.t l
750
82.3
t82
913
979
202
643
ll rl
l6 99
24 00
l.t tt
6t t2
72 00
79 0t
tr 67
89 J7
93 gtt
I 1.02
lt..ll
20 33
25.E)
33.0{)
1l 18
70.It2
81 00
88 0t
93 67
9t 57
102 98
'Percent of\tNk dtailctcttofr hil.lc \|all to tderte p<\nt
SlacL Dl8rm
A= 15n.
B={2tt.
Ixpth of Duct = 96 m
Crcss S€trcnal Aea DownSlr$m
Ol$urbancc
o
oao o a o o oao
upttrcam
Dkturbanaa
l6 ol36
l7 ol36
A/tfure Cyclonic Flow Check
Location --
Source --
Project No. -
Sample Point Anele (AP{))
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
13
t4
15
16
t7
IE
l9
20
2l
.,,
23
24
Averese
al6rce Method 3/3A Data
Locetion --
Source --
Project No. -
02 Data CO2 Dete
Dele/Time Date/Time
lllake/ModeVSN
Paremeter Cylinder ID Cylinder
Concentration. 7o
Analyzer
Concentration. 7o Cylinder lD Cylinder
Concentration. 7o
Analyzer
Concentration. 7o
Zero Gas
High Range Gas
rllid Renge Ges
Concentrstion Spa n, o/o
Required Accurecy, 7o
Date/Time Date/Time
illeke/llodeVSN
Parameter Cylinder lD (lvlinder
Conccntrqtion- o/"
Analyzer
Concpnlrltion- o/.Cylinder ID Cvlinder
Concentrrtion- o/.
Analyzer
Concentrltion- o/.
Zero Ges
High Range Gas
Mid Range Gas
Concentration Span, 7o
Required Accuracy, 7o
Dete/Time Date/Time
illeke/IlodeVS:\-
Parameter Cylinder lD Cylinder
Cnnnanirofinn o/-
Analyzer
r-^nnrnfroti^h o/^Cylinder lD Cylinder
l-nnnanfrafinn oZ
Analvzer
fnnnantrofinn o/^
Zero Gas
High Renge Gas
illid Range Gas
Concentration Sprn, 7o
Required Accuracy, %o
I 9 ol36
Method 4 Data
Source --
Project No. --
Parameter PM
Analysis Gravimetric
Run I Date:
lmpinger No.I )3 4 Total
Contents Empty Empty H20 Silica
Initial Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
Run 2 Date:
Impinger No.I .,3 4 Total
Contents Empty Empty H20 Silica
Initial Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
Run 3 Date:
Impinger No.I )3 4 Total
Contents Empty Empty H20 Silica
Initial Mass, g
Final Mass, g
Gain
20 ot'36
pd/t6rtre
Isokinetic Field Data
Sirrt Time:
Eod Time:
Sourre: -"
STACK DATA (EST)EOUIPMENT STACK DATA (EST)FlLTER NO.STACK DAT.{ 'FINAI,I MOIST. D,{T,{
Moillure: _70 esi
BsroDetric: - in Hg
Static Prcrs: - rn WC
Stack presr: - in Hg
CO1: - oh
O7: - lo
Ny'CO: - %
Md: - lb/lb-mole
illr: - lbilb-mole
Meter Bor ID,::_
Y:-
,lH @ 1ln.wc;'l--
Probc ID: -
Lioer Mrterirl: -
Pitot ID: -
litot cYryp.,---J-I-
I,to-t"lo,f
Nozle Do (in.): -
E!t, Tm:
E!1. T!: - 'F
E!t. APr - in WC
E!t. Dn: - in
Trrr.l R.ie: - cfm
Pb: - rn Hg
Pg: - in WC
ort-:-%
CO2: -- o/o
I a-^u q r-1.:-r
Vlc (ml)
K.FACTOR
-EAK CHECK! Pre Mid I Mid 2 ]! id 3 Polt Mid I (c0
Mid 2 (cf)
vlid 3 (c0
L..kR.t (.fm):
Vrcum (in Hg):
Pilol Tub.:,lid-Poitrl t .kClE kVol (.O:
AL
Sample Time
(minuae!)
Dry Grs llete.
Reading
(ft')
Pitol
Tube
AP
(ln wc)
Cr! TemEraturc! (oF)Orifice Press.
AH
(in. WC)
Pump
Vac
(in. Hg)
.:a. T.6mrr.nr.. loFl
% ISO Vr
(fps)
DGll Averrce Sixck Prob€Filrer Imn Erit Aur
Begin End rderl
o00 #DIV/O
#DIVi0l dDI\'OI
#DIV/OI tDtv/o
HDI\'/OI #r,vi0l
#DIV/OI dntv/0
HDIV/OI #DIV/OI
#Dlv/01 #DIV10l
HDIV/OI 4DI\"OI
#l)tv/01 #DtV/01
#DIViOI 4DIV/O
HDIV/Ol 4DIV,OI
#DMol #DIV,Oi
rDtv,ol
#DIV/OI #DIV/OI
#Dlvi0r ,DIV10
#Dlv/01 #DIV/O
tDIvi0r HDI\';O!
tDMOI #DIV/O
#DIV,0i #DIV/OI
tDMOr
#DIV/OI #DIViOI
#DIVi0r #DI\"0r
#DIV/Ol dDtv/o
#DIVi0r #DIVi0
a
=0L]
Run Time Vm AP Tm Ts Y"t AH %tso Bws Y..Vrc
60.0 mtn 0.000 ftJ in. WC - in. WC
2l of36
pultfure
s:l lr rl,
l,melion -
QA/QC Data
Source -
Projcct No. -
Pratmeler -
Date Nwle lD
N@lc Dismctcr (in.)
#l HZ 13 Dn lAvcrllc) Differcnce Critcria Mslcrial
< 0 0O.l rn
Dele Pitot lD llvidence ot
demnsa?
Evidence of
mir-rlionm€nt?
LSltDtttron ot
Rpneir reouircd?
Dote Probc ID Rcfercncc lndicatcd Dilfcrcncc Criteris Probe LcnEh
1.5 c6 (absolule)
Field Bslsncc Chsk
Dete
Balmce ID
Test Werrht tD
d We'uhl Iu)
D'fferpnce lo
Drt.Bsromctric Prersure EVrqanca ot
drmroa?Reading Vcrificd LAlOrttron ot
Reneir reouired?W.ath.r Station Lftaiion
Daie Meter Bor lD P6itive Prcssure Lcrk Ch(k
Resgeni Lol#Field Prcp per Ficld Lot Dat.By
Run Run I Run I
Flow R2ie llnml Flow Rate llnm)Flos Rale (lDm)
Clock Trme ('lmk [-rme I CImk Trme T
A6rce
Location: --
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Source: --
Project No.: --
Run No.: I
Parameter: --
Mcter Pregsure (Pm), in. Hg
AHPm = Pb+.t3s
wherc,
Pb.3=barometric pressure, in. Hg
AH.:= pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Pm -- = in. Hg
Absolutc Strck Grs Pressurc (Ps), in. Hg
Ps = pb* PB
whcrc, 13'6
Pb..;=barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg.;= static pressure, in. H2O
Pt--=in Hg
Stenderd Mctcr Volumc (Vmstd), dscf
77.647xYxVmxPmVmstd =Tmwhcrc,
Y.....-= meter correction factor
V.-.,,1!!!!-= meter volume, cf
Pr.;= absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Tr.-= absolute meter temperature, oR
Vmstd - = dscf
Standrrd Wct Volumc (Vwstd), scf
Vwstd=0.04707xVIc
whcre,
Vlc volume of H2O collected, ml
Y,,1516-=561
ilIoisture Fnction (BWSset), dimensionlcss (thcorcticrl st seturrtcd conditions)
1063?-(#:#)BWSsat = P,
whcre,
Tt.....-= stack temPerature, oF
Pr.....-= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat - = dimensionless
lVloisturc Frsction (BWS), dimensionless (mcrsurcd)
Vwstdntrrawotre7"" (Vwstd * Vmstd)Vwst6- " - -:- ' --= staildard wet volume, scf
Vmstd - = standard meter volume, dscf
BWS -- = dimensionless
23 of 36
A!6rce
Location: --
Source: --
Project No.: --
Run No.: I
Parameter: --
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Nloisture Frrction (BWS), dimcnsionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsdwhere,
BWSsat
BWSmsd
BWS
moisture fractton (theoretical at saturated conditions)
= moisture lractron (measured)
Nlolecular \l'eight (DR\') (!ld), lb/lb-mole
Md : (0.44 x 0/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28 (100- o/oCO2 - o/oOZ))
where,
CO,
-=
carbon dioxide concentration, o/o
= oxygen concentration, 7o
= lb/lb mol
Nlolecular Weight (\YET) (lls), Ib/lb-molc
Ms : Md (1 - BWS) + tB (BWS)
where,
o2
Md
Md
BWS
Ms
Average Velocity (!'s), ftlsec
= molecular weight (DRY), lbilb mol
= moisture tiaction, dimensionless
= Ib/lb mol
Vs = 85.49wherc,
Cp
a Pl/2
Ts
Ps
Ms
Vs
l-,,(LYrtzl avg x
^lor _ *
= pitot tube coefficrent \
xCpx
Averrge Strck Ges Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa = 60x Vs x As
where,
Vr.....-= stack gas velocrty, f1lsec
At.....-= cross-sectional area of stack. ftl
Qa - = acfm
Avenge Steck Ges Flow et Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Ps
Qs = 17.647 x Qa x
where,
= velocity head ofstack gas, (in. H2O)ril
= absolute stack temperature, oR
= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
= molecular u'eight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
= fVsec
= moisture tiaction. dimensionless
= absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
= absolute stack temperature, oR
= dscfm
(1 -BwS), r,
= average stack gas flow at stack condrtions, actmQa
BWS
Ps
Ts
Qs
24 o136
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
0.0319xTmx29
Dry Grs Dleter Calibretion Chcck (l'qa), dimcnsionless
Y -- : meter correction factor, dimensionless
,IF=run.me,mrn.
Yqa =
where,
Vm
Tm
^H@Pb
AH avg
Yqa
Volume of lriozzle (Vn), ftr
TstVn =- 10.002669xV\c*Ps\
where,
Ts
Ps
Vlc
Vm
Pm
Y
Tm
Vn
0 000
lsokinetic Sampling Rate (I), 7o
G x60xAnx7s
Vn
x 100
0 = total meter volume, dcf
-- : absolute meter temperature, "R
= orifice meter calibration coefllicient, in. Fl2O
= barometric pressure, in. Hg
= average pressure dit'ferential oforifice, in HzO
= molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
= average squareroot pressure differential oforifice, (in. H2O)'r
= dimensionless
= absolute stack temperature, oR
: absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
= volume of H2O collected, ml
= meter volume, cf
= absolute meter pressure, in. llg
= meter correction f'actor, unitless
= absolute meter temperature, oR
= volume ofnozzle, ftj
Vm xPmxY\_t Tm)
)xrool=
whcre,
Vn
0
An
Vs
I
nozzle volume. fil
60.0 = run time, minutes
= area of nozzle, ftl
= average velocity, fVsec
=%
25 of 36
A/t6tre
SOURCE TESTING QA Data
Location -
Source --
Project No. --
Parameter (l' - Orrflel COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Operating Range
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
i1
NA
1i
NA
t1
Cylinder Certifed Values
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
Y
NAil NA
rl
Alt6r'i@
SOURCE TESTING Calibration Data
Location: -
Source: --
Project No.: --
Date: --
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO: - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exoected Averase Concentration
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Span
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hieh
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.0
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
il
ResDonse Time (seconds)
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cur)
Instrument Response (%o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
NA NA NA
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA NA NA
21 of 36
AtlErrEE)
SOUFICE TESTING Bias/Drift Determinations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlel
Run I Date
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Mid Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Mid Response
Posttest Svstem Mid Response
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest SDan
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
Run 2 Date
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Mid Cal Response
Pretest Sy'stem Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Mid Response
Posttest System Mid Response
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Itctest Span
Posttest Soan
Drift (%)
Zerc
Mid
Run 3 Dete
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Mid Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Prctest System Mid Response
Posttest Svstem Mid Response
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Z,ero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
Drift (%)
7-erc
Mid
A/tfurc=Emissions Calculations
Location -
Source --
Project No. -
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
Source Data
Source Load. %o
Fue[ Factor (O2 drv). dscf/MMBtu
EL
Fd 8,71 0 8,710 8,710 8,7t0
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration, % dry co,
COz Concentration. % dry cco,
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (O2d)
CNo*
EFNo. o:a
29 of36
Ailfure
SOURCE TESTING
Lcrtion: -
Runl-CEMSData
Sourcc: --
Projet No.: -Drtc: -
Tioe
Urir
Stet6
Or - Outlca
Y. ,lry
V4lid
COr - Outlct NOr - Outlcl
'A dry p[mvdValid Valid
Ulcorr6icd RUE Avcngc (C6)
Crl G$ Coocetrirrtlon (CMr)
Prcl6t Syttcn Zaro R€poltc
P6ti6t SyttcE Z.ro Raporsc
Av.ng. Zcro R6pon!€ (Co)
Prct6t Syltcm Ctl R6poorc
P6tt6t Sytam Cd R6pon3c
Averege Cel Rapoarc (Cy)
CffiBt d R[!
30 of36
pult6trce
SOURCE TESTING
Location: -
NOx Converter Efficiency Check
Project No.: --
N02 Converter Check - Outlet
Analyzer Make
Analyzer Model
Serial Number
Cylinder ID Number
Cylinder Exp. Date
Cvlinder Concentration. DDm
Pre-Test Date Time
Pre-Test Concentration, ppm
Pre-Test Efficiency. To
Post-Test Date Time
Post-Test Concentration, ppm
Post-Test Efficiencv. 7o
*Required Efiiciency is > 90 %
3l of36
A/r6trce QA Data
Stratification Check
Location: 0
Source: 0
Project No.: 0
Traverse Point Time NOx
(oom)
o2
(o/o\
Coz
(o/ol
A-l
2
3
4
5
6
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
B-l
2
3
4
5
6
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
Average
Criteria Met Sinele Point Sinsle Point Sinele Point
pd/t6rre
SOURCE TESTING
Location: --
Project No.: --
FUEL FACTOR CALCULATION BASED ON FUEL ANALYSIS
CO}IPONEN'I Ntw lltot.Ey.NIOI-ES C NIOLES H I}IOLES O ]IIOLES N NIOLES S
HYDROGEI\2.016
HELIUV 4.003
METHANI t6.043
WATER 18.015
CARBON MONOXIDE 28.010
NITROGEI\28.013
ETHYLENE 28.054
ETHANE 30 070
OXYGEI\31.999
HYDROCEN SULFIDT 34.076
ARGOI\39.948
PROPYLENE 42.081
CARBON DIOXIDT 44 010
PROPANT 41.097
BLrTYLENES 56 08
ISO-BUTANE 58.24
N.BT]TANI 58 24
PENTENES 70 35
ISO-PENTANT 72 5l
N.PENTANE 72.5l
BENZENT 78.t4
HEXANT 86 78
TOLUENI 92 4t
HEPTANT 100.205
ETHYLBENZENE 106.168
XYLENI t06.168
TOTAL
\!,EIGHT (LBS'
WEIGHT%
L}IV (BTI.I/SCF):= SUM [(MOLE%, . LHV i) * 100 ]: suM [(MoLE%i o HHV i) * 100 ]
= SUM [(MOLE Yo1 o DENSITY i) * 100 ]
= DENSrry (LB/SCF) = DENSITYTTR (0.0763 LB/SCF)
= HIIV + DENSITY
=SUM [(MOLE%r . MWi) " 100 ]
= 106 , IG.6ao%H) + (1 .53.VoC) + (0.14o/sl!) + (0.57.%3)-(0.46o%O)]+ QQ,y
= 106 , [ (5.57 .%H) + (1.53.%C) + (0.14 o%N) + (0.57.%3) - (0.46 o%O) ] + GCV
= 106 , (0.321 .%C) * GCV
=0.209oFa=F"
HHV (BTI.I/SCF):
DENSITY (LB/SCF):
SPECIFIC GRAVIT}'
GC\'(BTI.'/LB)
NIW (LB/LBNIOLE)
F6 (DSCF/Iil\tBTt'):
F* (WSCF/lllllBTl-i):
F. (SCF/r!rltBTL',):
Expected Foi
33 of 36
I
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source: --
Project No.: --
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cro,), ppmvd
C:ro* = ( Cou, - Co ) * ( ,ft;)
where,
Cob,
co
Cto
CM
Cruo*
DrNo*od -
where,
Cxo*
K
Fd
co,
EELr NC)xC)d
#N/A
L l 95E-07
8,7 l0
: average analyzer value during test, ppmvd: average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd: actual concentration ofcalibration gas, ppmvd: average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd: NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFno,o,a), lb/MMBtu
ER516"xKxFd- (rd,-4;)
= NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
= constant, lb/dscf ' ppmvd
= fuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
= oxygen concentration, %o
= lb/MMBtu
34 of36
Alr6rtrce
SOURCE TESTING
L6raio: Tesoro Refinrnc ad Mrketrnu Compmv
EPA Method 205
Field Calibration of Dilution System
Projeci No.: --
D.te
Analvzer Male
Analyzer Model
Analyzer SN
Envrronics ID
ComponenvBalace Gr -
Cylrnder Gm ID (Drlutron)
Cylrnder Ga Concentrahon (Drlutron). ppm
Cylrnder Co tD (lllid-Lerel)
Cylrnder Co Concentranon (Mrd-Level). ppm
Targel l!1.3! Flow
Trrget
Diluiion
Target Flw
Rte
Trrget
ConcenirNtion
Aclusl
Concenirrtion
Itrjection I
Analyzer
Cotrcaniraiion
Injection 2
Analyzer
Conceotrstion
Injeclion 3
Analyzer
Concentratioo
Aversge
Analyzer
Corceolrslion Diflereoce Average Error
(L2%l
l0ul0L.q00 'to
800 70
IOU5L 800 50
I 0t./5t.500 50
IOU IL 200 40
t0t-/II.t00 .1 0
*Not all AST Environrcs Unrts have 2-l0L M6s Flow Controllers For these units the 90% @ Tlpm md 80% @ Tlpm inlections will not be conducted
Avcrage
Aorlyzcr
Coocentralioo
lnjectior I
Error
I t2%t
lnjeclioo 2
Error
( t2%l
hjection 3
Error
(+2%l
NliilLevel SuDolv Gr! Crlibration Direci to
Crlibrstion
Gas
Cotrcentration
Inj4lion I
Analyzcr
Concentrrtion
lnjstion 2
Analyzer
Concen(rrtion
lnjection J
Analyzer
Concentrrtion
Average
Analyzer
Conceniration Dilference
AvemSe
Error
35 ol36
36 of36