Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDAQ-2024-0104701 DAQC-960-24 Site ID 13267 (B4) MEMORANDUM TO: STACK TEST FILE – STAKER & PARSON COMPANIES – Portable Aggregate Equipment – Duchesne County THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist DATE: September 24, 2024 SUBJECT: Source: Gencor Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Contact: Nakeasha Scovill: 385-794-2950 Location: 2 miles north of Duchesne, UT Test Contractor: TETCO Permit/AO#: DAQE-AN132670009-21 dated April 7, 2021 Action Code: TR Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated September 25, 2023 On September 20, 2024, the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the Gencor Hot Mix Asphalt Plant 2 miles north of Duchesne in Duchesne County, Utah. Testing was performed on September 20-21, 2023, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in condition II.B.9 in Approval Order DAQE-AN132670009-21 and 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart OOO. The DAQ-calculated test results are: Source Test Date Test Methods Pollutants Tester Results DAQ Results Limits Gencor Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Sept 20-21, 2023 M5 PM 0.0201 gr/dscf 0.0205 gr/dscf 0.024 gr/dscf 9 VEO 0.0 % N/A 20% DEVIATIONS: None. CONCLUSION: The stack test appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: The hot mix asphalt plant was operating at an average of 177.6 tons per hour of throughput during the time of testing. It is recommended the Gencor Hot Mix Asphalt Plant be considered as in compliance with its VEO and PM emission limits, during the time of testing. HPV: None. ATTACHMENTS: Staker & Parson Companies’ Stack Test Report, DAQ excel worksheets. Staker Parson Companies Portable Aggregate Equipment(Site ID: 13267) Portable Source, UT Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Test Date: 9/20/2024 - 9/21/2024 EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources Run # 1 2 3 Average date 9/20/2023 9/20-21/2023 9/21/2023 start time 11:45 15:50 9:33 stop time 15:19 9:10 11:03 sampling time (minutes) 72.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 DS stack diameter (inches) 60.75 60.75 60.75 60.75 PAVG average (delta P)½ (" H2O)½0.4755 0.4767 0.4791 0.4771 CP pitot tube constant (unitless) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 TS stack temp. (°F) 239.3 241.8 263.8 248.3 Pbar barometric pressure (" Hg) 24.35 24.31 24.20 24.29 Ps stack pressure (" H2O)-0.31 -0.31 -0.31 -0.31 Yd meter box Yd (unitless)1.0030 1.0030 1.0030 1.003 Tm meter temp. (°F) 77.20 78.90 81.50 79.20 Vm sample volume (ft3)46.688 59.291 50.186 52.055 H orifice setting delta H (" H2O)1.343 2.423 1.663 1.8 Vlc moisture (g) 171.4 154.8 166.2 164.1 O2%vd oxygen (%vd) 13.7 13.8 13.8 13.8 CO2%vd carbon dioxide (%vd) 2.0 2.7 3.6 2.8 DN nozzle diameter (inches) 0.3120 0.3650 0.3390 0.3387 Run # 1 2 3 Average grams mass particulate front half (g) 0.0053 0.0078 0.0088 0.00730 grams mass particulate filter (g) 0.0023 -0.0018 0.0014 0.00063 grams mass inorganic fraction (g) 0.0221 0.0347 0.0243 0.02703 grams mass organic fraction (g) 0.0213 0.0360 0.0066 0.02125 Run # 1 2 3 Average Vmstd sample volume (dscf) 37.586 47.658 39.874 41.706 sample volume (dscm) 1.064 1.350 1.129 1.181 Vwstd moisture volume (dscf) 8.083 7.300 7.838 7.741 Bws measured moisture content (%/100) 0.177 0.133 0.164 0.158 saturated moisture content (%/100) 2.064 2.163 3.183 2.470 actual moisture content (%/100) 0.177 0.133 0.164 0.158 MD molecular weight (dry) 28.87 28.9840 29.13 28.99 MA molecular weight (actual) 26.95 27.53 27.30 27.26 VS gas velocity (ft/sec) 35.3 35.1 36.0 35.4 FACFM gas flow (acfm) 42,584 42,349 43,501 42,811 FDSCFM gas flow (dscfm) 21,525 22,438 21,439 21,800 lb/hr gas flow (lb/hr) 109,662 110,826 108,981 109,823 % % isokinetic 92.0 98.1 99.6 96.6 Permit Limits lb/hr F½ PM (lb/hr) 0.576 0.374 0.726 0.558 gr/dscf F½ PM (gr/dscf) 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.003 lb/hr inorganic CPM emissions (lb/hr) 1.674 2.161 1.729 1.855 gr/dscf inorganic CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.009 0.011 0.009 0.010 lb/hr organic CPM emissions (lb/hr) 1.610 2.239 0.466 1.438 gr/dscf organic CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.009 0.012 0.003 0.008 lb/hr total CPM emissions (lb/hr) 3.284 4.401 2.194 3.293 gr/dscf total CPM emissions (gr/dscf) 0.018 0.023 0.012 0.018 lb/hr Total PM (lb/hr) 3.860 4.774 2.920 3.852 gr/dscf Total PM (gr/dscf) 0.021 0.025 0.016 0.0205 0.024 Field Reference Method Data Laboratory Data Reference Method Calculations Page 1 of 3 Staker Parson Companies Portable Aggregate Equipment(Site ID: 13267) Portable Source, UT Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Test Date: 9/20/2024 - 9/21/2024 EPA Methods 5 & 202: Determination of Particulate and Condensible Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources Run 1 - Intermediate Isokinetic values Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack % 480.878 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics 1 3 525.703 0.22 0.4690 0.97 244 76 77 93.73 2 3 527.65 0.23 0.4796 1.01 244 76 77 93.47 3 3 529.635 0.23 0.4796 1.01 244 76 77 91.35 4 3 531.575 0.21 0.4583 0.92 243 77 77 97.14 5 3 533.55 0.21 0.4583 0.92 241 78 78 88.00 6 3 535.345 0.2 0.4472 0.88 240 78 79 90.52 7 3 537.15 0.2 0.4472 0.88 238 79 79 96.56 8 3 539.08 0.23 0.4796 1.01 230 75 75 86.02 9 3 540.92 0.22 0.4690 0.97 230 75 75 92.00 10 3 542.845 0.26 0.5099 1.14 234 76 76 91.37 11 3 544.92 0.27 0.5196 1.19 239 76 77 92.51 12 3 547.055 0.27 0.5196 1.19 243 77 77 90.91 13 3 549.149 0.28 0.5292 1.23 230 73 74 96.77 14 3 551.425 0.31 0.5568 1.36 224 74 74 87.46 15 3 553.6 0.26 0.5099 1.14 228 74 75 88.15 16 3 555.605 0.22 0.4690 0.97 233 75 76 91.64 17 3 557.52 0.2 0.4472 0.88 240 76 77 91.86 18 3 559.345 0.2 0.4472 0.88 247 77 78 93.91 19 3 561.205 0.2 0.4472 0.88 250 77 79 95.80 20 3 563.1 0.21 0.4583 0.92 249 79 80 91.45 21 3 564.96 0.21 0.4583 0.92 246 79 80 92.24 22 3 566.84 0.21 0.4583 0.92 243 80 81 91.38 23 3 568.71 0.2 0.4472 0.88 239 80 82 101.76 24 3 570.75 0.2 0.4472 0.88 243 81 82 82.01 572.391 Run 2 - Intermediate Isokinetic values Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack % Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics 1 2.5 573.602 0.25 0.5000 2.63 252 77 77 96.69 2 2.5 576.125 0.24 0.4899 2.53 250 77 77 97.81 3 2.5 578.63 0.23 0.4796 2.43 248 78 79 111.97 4 2.5 581.45 0.2 0.4472 2.12 244 78 80 85.40 5 2.5 583.465 0.19 0.4359 2.02 241 79 82 100.14 6 2.5 585.78 0.19 0.4359 2.02 241 80 83 98.87 7 2.5 588.07 0.2 0.4472 2.12 245 80 84 101.23 8 2.5 590.47 0.24 0.4899 2.55 248 81 85 104.12 9 2.5 593.17 0.27 0.5196 2.87 249 83 87 93.61 10 2.5 595.75 0.27 0.5196 2.87 247 83 87 97.83 11 2.5 598.45 0.27 0.5196 2.87 246 83 88 97.31 12 2.5 601.14 0.26 0.5099 2.76 242 83 88 96.94 13 2.5 603.778 0.3 0.5477 3.19 238 82 85 97.08 14 2.5 606.61 0.27 0.5196 2.87 239 82 86 100.70 15 2.5 609.4 0.23 0.4796 2.44 239 83 87 95.90 16 2.5 611.86 0.23 0.4796 2.44 239 83 87 99.02 17 2.5 614.4 0.19 0.4359 2.02 238 83 87 101.67 18 2.5 616.775 0.19 0.4359 2.02 238 83 87 96.10 19 2.5 619.02 0.2 0.4472 2.12 238 84 87 130.51 20 2.5 622.15 0.21 0.4583 2.23 240 62 63 101.72 21 2.5 624.54 0.2 0.4472 2.12 231 63 63 137.18 22 2.5 627.71 0.21 0.4583 2.23 231 63 64 62.46 23 2.5 629.19 0.22 0.4690 2.34 237 64 66 101.62 DGM Meter Temp ⁰F DGM Meter Temp ⁰F Page 2 of 3 24 2.5 631.65 0.22 0.4690 2.34 241 65 68 91.91 633.875 Run 3 - Intermediate Isokinetic values Point Dwell Time DGM ∆P √∆P ∆H Stack % 579.005 Temp ⁰F Inlet Outlet Isokinetics 1 2.5 635.752 0.21 0.4583 1.54 275 72 73 109.64 2 2.5 637.9 0.22 0.4690 1.57 277 73 74 117.14 3 2.5 640.25 0.2 0.4472 1.46 280 73 74 77.25 4 2.5 641.725 0.2 0.4472 1.46 278 74 76 101.44 5 2.5 643.67 0.19 0.4359 1.39 272 75 78 108.38 6 2.5 645.71 0.19 0.4359 1.39 268 76 79 98.37 7 2.5 647.57 0.26 0.5099 1.9 265 77 80 94.49 8 2.5 649.665 0.25 0.5000 1.83 265 78 81 96.85 9 2.5 651.775 0.27 0.5196 1.98 267 79 83 108.33 10 2.5 654.23 0.28 0.5292 1.99 269 80 83 99.06 11 2.5 656.515 0.28 0.5292 1.99 269 80 84 88.57 12 2.5 658.56 0.29 0.5385 2.06 260 81 85 93.57 13 2.5 660.776 0.29 0.5385 2.06 259 82 85 97.55 14 2.5 663.09 0.27 0.5196 1.98 260 83 86 98.60 15 2.5 665.35 0.27 0.5196 1.98 260 83 87 98.51 16 2.5 667.61 0.22 0.4690 1.57 261 84 88 103.57 17 2.5 669.76 0.22 0.4690 1.57 262 85 89 94.55 18 2.5 671.725 0.19 0.4359 1.35 261 85 89 104.19 19 2.5 673.74 0.19 0.4359 1.35 264 87 90 100.25 20 2.5 675.68 0.19 0.4359 1.35 265 87 91 97.13 21 2.5 677.56 0.2 0.4472 1.43 237 82 83 92.46 22 2.5 679.41 0.22 0.4690 1.57 242 82 83 98.08 23 2.5 681.46 0.23 0.4796 1.64 251 82 83 105.97 24 2.5 683.71 0.21 0.4583 1.5 259 82 84 110.29 685.938 DGM Meter Temp ⁰F Page 3 of 3 PM10 COMPLIANCE TEST CONDUCTED FOR STAKER AND PARSON COMPANIES Cdba BURDICK CONSTRUCTION GENCOR BAGHOUSE September 20-21, 2023 by: TETCO 391 East 620 South American Fork, UT 84003 Phone: 801 492-9106 Fax: 801 492-9107 Prepared for: Staker and Parson Companies 2 miles North of Duchesne Duchesne County, UT 84066 Date of Report: September 25, 2023 CERTIFICATION OF RE PORT INTEGRITY Technical Emissions Testing Company (TETCO) certifies that this report represents the truth as well as can be derived by the methods employed. Every effort was made to obtain accurate and representative data and to comply with procedures set forth in the Federal Register. Dean A. Kitchen Rcvicwer: _______ ---#~'------'~--"'----'-0---..,,,:::-/4~-e;_ _ _._____,=------- Date: /~" p ._., )-] --------------~~----~~,.. .... ""------ ~ Xuan N. Dang Reviewer: __ ---=.....,..=---~o::::::::::::=. _____ ;;;;;;;;;~==========::::~--- Date: ________ ____,/.._.o ...... /._.o,.....-2__._h--,~r) _______ _ i i iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction Test Purpose .........................................................................................................................1 Test Location and Type of Process ......................................................................................1 Test Dates.............................................................................................................................1 Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied ..............................................................................1 Test Participants ...................................................................................................................1 Deviations From EPA Methods ...........................................................................................2 Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................2 Summary of Results Emission Results ..................................................................................................................3 Process Data .........................................................................................................................3 Allowable Emissions ...........................................................................................................3 Description of Collected Samples ........................................................................................3 Discussion of Errors or Irregularities ...................................................................................4 Percent Isokinetic .................................................................................................................4 Source Operation Process Control Devices Operation .....................................................................................5 Process Representativeness ..................................................................................................5 Sampling and Analytical Procedures Sampling Port Location .......................................................................................................6 Sampling Point Location......................................................................................................6 Sampling Train Description .................................................................................................6 Sampling and Analytical Procedures ...................................................................................7 Quality Assurance ................................................................................................................7 Appendices A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations B: Raw Field Data C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody D: Raw Production Data E: Calibration Procedures and Results F: Related Correspondence iv LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table I Measured PM Emissions and Production Rates ..................................................................3 II Percent Isokinetic Sampling ................................................................................................4 III Sampling Point Locations ....................................................................................................6 IV Complete Results ............................................................................................... Appendix A LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Facility Schematic Representation ..................................................................... Appendix D 2 Schematic of Method 5/202 Sampling Train ..................................................... Appendix E 1 INTRODUCTION Test Purpose This test was conducted to determine compliance with the particulate matter (PM) emission limits of the facility’s Approval Order (AO), Number DAQE-AN132670009-21, dated April of 2021. Emissions were expressed in terms of grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf) and pounds per hour (lb/hr) where applicable. The protocol was written by Montrose in April 2021, when the plant was under the ownership of Chapman Constructions and located at Loa, Utah. Since then, the plant has been purchased by Staker and Parson Companies, and temporarily moved to Duchesne, UT. Test Location and Type of Process The asphalt plant was located approximately 2 miles North of Duchesne, Utah. The source tested was the Gencor Baghouse. Sand, gravel, recyclable, asphalt and oil were mixed and dried in a natural gas fired drum. The exhaust gas passed through the Gencor baghouse. A facility schematic is shown as Figure 1 found in Appendix D. Test Dates Test crews drove up to the plant and set up equipment on September 18, 2023. No testing was conducted on this date. Run 1 was done on September 20, 2023. Run 2 was conducted on the 20th and finished on the 21st. Run 3 was done on September 21, 2023 Pollutants Tested and Methods Applied These tests were a gravimetric determination of PM particulate in accordance with EPA Methods 5 and 202. For this project, Method 5 was used instead of Method 201A because the relatively high moisture content of the stack exhaust would lead to a low Method 201A sample rate, despite the stack gas not being saturated with water droplets. Condensable particulate matter (PM) was sampled as the back-half of the Method 5 sample train. Test Participants Test Facility Nakeasha Scovill Andy Potter State Agency None TETCO Dean Kitchen Joseph Wells Mike McNamara 2 Deviations From EPA Methods None. Quality Assurance Testing procedures and sample recovery techniques were according to those outlined in the Federal Register and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems. 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Emission Results Table I presents the summary results of the compliance test. Detailed testing results are found in Table IV. Complete Results in Appendix A. Table I Measured PM Emissions and Production Rates Run # Particulate Matter Production Rate Concentration (gr/dscf) Emission Rate (lbs/hr) (TPH) 1 0.003 0.58 178.2 2 0.002 0.37 177.3 3 0.004 0.72 177.2 AVE 0.003 0.56 177.6 Condensable particulate matter results are found on Table IV. Complete Results in Appendix A. Process Data The process was operated according to standard procedures. All pertinent process data was available for recording by agency personnel. Aggregate, recycled asphalt, asphalt tar feed rate, and the baghouse differential pressure drop were recorded on production sheets found in Appendix D. Allowable Emissions The allowable PM emissions for this source are 0.030 gr/dscf. The allowable PM10 and PM 2.5 emissions for this source are 0.024 gr/dscf. Description of Collected Samples The front washes were clear in appearance. There was a small amount of visible tan colored particulate on the test filters. 4 Discussion of Errors or Irregularities None. Percent Isokinetic Sampling The EPA Method 5/202 test runs were isokinetic within the ±10% of 100% criteria specified in the Federal Register. Isokinetic values for each test run are presented in Table II below. Table II. Percent Isokinetic Sampling Run # Percent Isokinetic 1 92 2 98 3 100 5 SOURCE OPERATION Process Control Devices Operation All control devices operated normally. Control equipment data is found on the production data sheets. Process Representativeness The facility was operated normally. Production data is contained in Appendix D. 6 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Sampling Port Location Port location is depicted in Figure 1. The inside dimension of the stack was 60.75 inches. Two ports, both with reference of 2.875 inches, were available for testing. These ports were located 64 inches upstream from the next disturbance and 11 feet downstream from the last disturbance. Sampling Point Location Table III shows the distance of each sampling point from the inside wall according to EPA Method 1. Each point was marked with a wrapping of glass tape. These points were determined by measuring the distance from the inside wall and adding the reference (port) measurement. Table III. Sampling Point Locations Traverse Point Distance (inches) 1 4.15 2 6.95 3 10.04 4 13.63 5 18.06 6 24.50 7 42.00 8 48.44 9 52.87 10 56.46 11 59.55 12 62.35 Sampling Train Description To determine the actual emission rates for this stack, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, and 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 202 were followed. All sampling trains were made of Teflon, stainless steel and glass to prevent interference of the sampled gas. The stack analyzer used to conduct Methods 5 and 202 was constructed to meet the specifications outlined in the CFR. The temperature sensors were K-type thermocouples. Heater, vacuum and pitot line connections were designed to be interchangeable with all units used by the tester. Stainless steel probe liners were used for each test run. Figure 2 in Appendix E is a sketch of the Method 5/202 sampling train. Sample boxes were prepared for testing by following the prescribed procedure outlined in Methods 5 and 202. 7 Sampling and Analytical Procedures All sampling and analytical test procedures employed were as specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 5 and 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method and 202. Quality Assurance All equipment set-up, sampling procedures, sample recovery and equipment calibrations were carried out according to the procedures specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 5and 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Method 202 and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems. 8 APPENDICES A: Complete Results and Sample Calculations B: Raw Field Data C: Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody D: Raw Production Data E: Calibration Procedures and Results F: Protocol and Related Correspondence A APPENDIX A Complete Results and Sample Equations Table IV. Complete Results Nomenclature Sample Equations Method 5, 202TABLE IV COMPLETE RESULTS STAKER CONSTRUCTION, DUCHESNE, UTAH HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT Symbol Description Dimensions Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Date Date 09/20/23 9/20-21/23 09/21/23 Filter #7652 7653 7654 Begin Time Test Began 11:45 15:50 9:33 End Time Test Ended 15:19 9:10 11:03 Pbm Meter Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 24.35 24.31 24.20 DH Orifice Pressure Drop In. H2O 1.343 2.423 1.663 Y Meter Calibration Y Factor dimensionless 1.003 1.003 1.003 Vm Volume Gas Sampled--Meter Conditions cf 46.688 59.291 50.186 Tm Avg Meter Temperature oF 77.2 78.9 81.5 DP Sq Root Velocity Head Root In. H2O 0.4755 0.4767 0.4791 Wtwc Weight Water Collected Grams 171.4 154.8 166.2 Tt Duration of Test Minutes 72 60 60 Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient Dimensionless 0.84 0.84 0.84 Dn Nozzle Diameter Inches 0.3120 0.3650 0.3390 CO2 Volume % Carbon Dioxide Percent 2.00 2.70 3.60 O2 Volume % Oxygen Percent 13.70 13.80 13.80 N2 & CO Volume % Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide Percent 84.30 83.50 82.60 Vmstd Volume Gas Sampled (Standard)dscf 37.609 47.687 39.898 Vw Volume Water Vapor scf 8.083 7.300 7.838 Bws (measured)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Measured)Fraction 0.177 0.133 0.164 Bws (calculated)Fraction H2O in Stack Gas (Calculated)Fraction 1.070 1.072 1.077 Bws Fraction H2O in Stack Gas Fraction 0.177 0.133 0.164 Xd Fraction of Dry Gas Fraction 0.823 0.867 0.836 Md Molecular Wt. Dry Gas lb/lbmol 28.87 28.98 29.13 Ms Molecular Wt. Stack Gas lb/lbmol 26.95 27.53 27.30 %I Percent Isokinetic Percent 92.0 98.2 99.7 AVG Ts Avg Stack Temperature oF 239.3 241.8 263.8 248.3 As Stack Cross Sectional Area Sq. Ft.20.129 20.129 20.129 PG Stack Static Pressure In. H2O -0.31 -0.31 -0.31 Pbp Sample Port Barometric Pressure In. Hg. Abs 24.32 24.28 24.17 Ps Stack Pressure In. Hg. Abs 24.297 24.257 24.147 Qs Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Std)dscfm 2.15E+04 2.24E+04 2.14E+04 2.18E+04 Qa Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual)cfm 4.26E+04 4.24E+04 4.35E+04 4.28E+04 Vs Velocity of Stack Gas fpm 2.12E+03 2.11E+03 2.16E+03 2.13E+03 Mfilter Mass of Particulate on Filter milligrams 2.3 -1.8 1.4 Mp Mass of Particulate in Wash milligrams 5.3 7.8 8.8 MF Mass of Front Half milligrams 7.6 6.0 10.2 7.93 MB Mass of Back Half milligrams 42.2 69.6 29.7 47.17 CF Concentration of Front Half gr / dscf 0.0031 0.0019 0.0039 0.0030 Ccond Concentration of Condensibles gr / dscf 0.0173 0.0225 0.0115 0.0171 CFcond Combined Front Half and CPM gr / dscf 0.0204 0.0245 0.0154 0.0201 ERF Emission Rate of Front Half lb / hr 0.575 0.373 0.724 0.557 ERcond Emission Rate of Condensibles lb / hr 3.190 4.326 2.108 3.208 ERFcond Emission Rate of Front Half and CPM lb / hr 3.765 4.699 2.832 3.765 %I =percent isokinetic As =stack cross-sectional area (ft3) AS∆P =see √∆P Btu =unit heat value (British thermal unit) Bws =fraction of water in stack gas Ccpm =concentration of condensibles (grain/dscf) Cf =concentration of particulate matter, front half (gr/dscf,lb/dscf, etc.) Cmetal =concentration of metals (ppm, µg/ft3, etc.) atomic symbol replaces "metal" CO2 =percent carbon dioxide in the stack gas Cp =pitot tube coefficient (0.84) CX (avg)=species symbol replaces x . CX (corr)=actual gas concentration corrected to required percent O2 ∆H =orifice pressure drop (inches H2O) ∆H@ =orifice pressure (inches H2O) Dn =nozzle diameter (inches) Dn des =calculated desired nozzle size (inches) ∆P =stack flow pressure differential (inches H2O) Ds =diameter of the stack (feet) EA =percent excess air ERcpm =emission rate of condensibles (lb/hr) ERF =emission rate of front half particulate (lb/hr) ERmmBtu =emission rate per mmBtu or ton of fuel etc. ERX =emission rate of compound which replaces x K-fact =multiplier of test point ∆P to determine test point ∆H L =length of rectangular stack (inches) mBtu =thousand Btu Mcpm =mass of condensibles (milligrams) Md =molecular weight of stack gas, dry basis (lb/lb-mol) MF =mass of particulate on filter (mg) MFP =mass of particulate matter on filter and probe (mg) mmBtu =million Btu MP =mass of particulate matter in probe (mg) Ms =molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis (g/gmol) N2 =percent nitrogen in the stack gas O2 =percent oxygen in the stack gas √∆P =average of the square roots of ∆P (may also be referred to as AS∆P) Pbm =absolute barometric pressure at the dry gas meter (inches Hg) Pbp =absolute barometric pressure at the sample location (inches Hg) PG =stack static pressure (inches H2O) Ps =absolute stack pressure (inches Hg) Pstd =absolute pressure at standard conditions (29.92 inches Hg.) θ =time of test (minutes) Qa =stack gas volumetric flow rate (acfm) Method 5 / 202 Nomenclature Method 5 / 202 Nomenclature Qs =stack gas volumetric flow rate (dscfm) Qw =wet stack gas std. volumetric flow (ft3/min, wscfm) Tm =meter temperature (oF) Ts =stack temperature (oF) Tstd =absolute temperature at standard conditions (528oR) Tt =see θ Vm =sample volume (ft3) at meter conditions Vmstd =volume standard (dscf), sample volume adjusted to 68oF and 29.92 inches Hg. Vs =velocity of stack gas (fpm) Vw =volume water vapor (scf) at 68oF and 29.92 inches Hg. W =width of rectangular stack (inches) Wtwc =weight of the condensed water collected (grams) Xd =fraction of dry gas Y =meter calibration Y-factor (dimensionless) %I =Vmstd • (Ts + 460) • 1039 / (θ • Vs • Ps • Xd • Dn2) As =(Ds2 / 4) • π Bws =Vw / (Vmstd +Vw) Ccpm =Mcpm • 0.01543 / Vmstd Ccors =Mcors • 0.01543 / Vmstd Cf =Mfp • 0.01543 / Vmstd CX (corr)=CX (avg) • (20.9 - desired %O2) / (20.9 - actual %O2) Deq =2 • L • W / (L + W) Dn des =√{0.0269 • (Pbm + 0.0735) / [(Tm + 460) • Cp • Xd • √[(Ts + 460) • Ms) / (Ps • ∆P)]]} EA =(%O2 - 0.5 %CO) / [0.264 %N2 - (%O2 - 0.5 %CO)] ERcpm =Ccpm • Qs • 0.00857 ERF =Cf • Qs • 0.00857 ERmmBtu =ERX / (mmBtu / hr) K-fact =846.72 • Dn4 • ∆H@ • Cp2 • Xd2 • Md • Ps • (Tm + 460) / [Ms • (Ts + 460) • (Pbm + ∆H / 13.6)] Md =CO2 • 0.44 + O2 • 0.32 + N2 •0.28 Ms =(Md • Xd) + (18 • Bws) Ps =Pbp + (PG / 13.6) Qa =Vs • As Qs =Qa • Xd • Ps • Tstd / [(Ts + 460) • Pstd] Qw =Qs / Xd Vmstd =Vm • Y • Tstd • (Pbm + ∆H / 13.6) / [Pstd • (Tm + 460)] Vs =85.49 • 60 • Cp • √∆P • √ [(Ts + 460) / (Ps • Ms)] Vw =Wtwc • 0.04715 Xd =1 - Bws Method 5 / 202 Sample Equations B APPENDIX B Raw Field Data Preliminary Velocity Traverse and Sampling Point Location Data Particulate Field Data Prelim 12 pts r N Stack Dia. I I r;, &., 7S" l I/ Reference: k: ;;,p p !' ti II l . orts arc~/L-1-___ l pslrcam from ncxl d1s1urhnn.:t, Ports arc _-+/_._/_1 __ Downstream from last disturbance Traverse Percent Distance From: Point Diameter ID Reference I 2.1 /1 -;-.B 4 ./J- 2 6.7 '1, Cl 7 h •Yci 3 11.8 7. 17 /tJ, () 'I 4 17.7 J/P. -zr IJ. b) s 25.0 IF,19 /$., db 6 35.6 )(.6) ),. "1 · .ro 7 64.4 :>if;_ 1,0 .. t:Po 8 75.0 '1,F,Jb <-t/J. 'It/ 9 82.3 /<J.oo n.i7 10 88.2 f),FB .,,s~t I "I b II 93.3 FC. ,f3 ,Ff/J"F 12 97.9 JY.'17 C;..JT Averages: Ts ."1P Facility Staker, Duchesne, UT Stack Identification V..._f\.(O( B(l ~hOJJ,...Q.. - Date q(z_..o l z.3 Barometric Pressure Pb111 l<-\,')) in Hg PbP v'<.-::>L in Hg Static Pressure (Po) in Hp Estimated Moisture (Bw.) 25-30 % Sample Height from Ground ~~et 3'c) Comments: ------------------- A ~'-\ 0\ 8 ~ S" . L\ ~ \'.l-. ---- --- B LFlow ✓l'!P Po rts C ---- D E F ~ Field Dala Shee1 TETCO Filler ]C.52,,...,_ Sample Box A_ Page ~l_of~_f Run # \ Plant Staker, Duchesne, UT Location: 1{~,,,, (27-,t) ... r k~e Operator: M . M C:..,..1 wN\rA .A c> Da1e 1/i.o!z.,3, Traverse Time DGM L\P L\H (nH,OJ Vac\lum Temperatures c'n Point Clock Min (0) rn'i t.,11:01 Desired Actual (a,Hf') Stack (T,) Probe p.._ 1 11'-"1'5 0 .sH .70) I Ll,.. -9+ -9-=1-'2..-11{"( 2'-f I 2 3 521-.<,~O '2"?, 1-o\ \.o I z._.. 2. '{'-f 1.. 'i-::J- 3 <.. 5Z.C\ .<.,;.(' • z..:> f.o l l .o \ '1.-2. '{ L\ Zif' 4 ~ s ?)\ ')1-) , Z..l ,42.. ,<:rz, 2. '2.'-f') z.<,. { 5 11. 5 YL .;' fo • '2.. \ .q-z._ ,q'2-'2-2..~ I • lC..s:i 6 IC, SH ., .. 11 . io -~~ .~0 2.-1..YO 2.,q 7 ,~ 53=t. I SO ,2..0 -0~ ·1'.>~ 2.. Z..38 2"1) 8 -z.1 53Cf. o 4()0 • Z-:> I ,fl> l 1.0 l 2, 7,3o Z.{~ 9 2-4 5'fo.9i.o 'i..t-."I~ -'\+ 2.. '2,>0 1-{<-\ 10 l~ 5'i2.. S'ii" .-z..C.e 1.l'-1. I. I '1 2-z, -:>'{ 1-~"b 11 3-0 ~'-{1 -'t'LO -2~ I. 1<\ I . ('1_ '2-- 1. ~" 2.fo p-12 3:) ~'-{".}. o5f ,,z..1-I. I<\ LI<=\ 2-'2.'f~ l-3-( ) 1 If 'i3 3 ,ro S'i"l . 14"l ,'2..~ (.t:) \. 2-'> "L i.Jv 2.~~ 2 39 551 -'i-z.{ . '3 t I '') <., \.J<., '2.. 2.2.'i Z<..5 3 'iZ-553.e,oo, .,z.~ l ,l'-\ 1-l I{ i.. ZZ-8 t,<.,) 4 '\) 555 .(.o) I '2,'L I <t1--• "f 1" 2,... Z.)~ "2.C, <{ 5 ~<o 55":r·fZ.O ,1,0 .<o~ .~e, 7.... 1,.'-{ 0 l(o 6 51 559 _ 3'i) ,20 .~e .~t; l-2 '--I-,-1.{1..- 7 5~ 5c..t-1..o5 \ '2..0 .ee .~v 2-1.,{0 l~7- 8 sr 5(q3 .100 • 1-I • <t'l.-·"1-Z.. 1.. 2. '{ C\ u.~ 9 (,o 5Ul.'te,o • 'Z-\ -~'Z.-.92-1,..., 1.t.H,.., 1-~e 10 63 ,5(.,(, -~'iC • i. l . qi. . 'l '2-2-2.--1) 2.c,t 11 (,, Cp seoe:i-,o ,7,0 -'Be . fo'o z.. 2.Yt U.,o 12 lo'f 510-~:fo . 'to ,'!>« ,,S"o 'l,. l. '{:) 1'-o 1'l-. 5t2, .3,, ., , , ,, . -. v v,- 15:1, To1al L{ ~ . (, i'b / ✓ ll -~ l 'L\-✓ '.) l .7.:,o ./ I. 3q1, S ll{1., / 1.:~3-., ~ Avera_!l_e ✓ .•rt55 Commems l\WI\-\t.'.~ "iµ"'f ""~"~IA., ~\..-.c1+ Oe>u.:>f\ ~ t-(lo·,(\~ ~ t-<\L-~t.,( 5J& ~°''\, \1. · . .i. i() µ~-\- \ ~ ·_o-Z.,, ~!.µ+ ~ ~,;-\-Qov.)f\ ~~,...."-'?o,'fl.+ d'-' ?o,'\~ \'t.. ,..,.._-l~ 5'11 -, \ 1-. tQ.. 'j\.J x- \'-{. YO CPM Oven Filler 2<.:::r (o ~ 1.<,C{ C, ;:,- 7.c,{ 15 '1.(.. -=l-1~ 2.~ l l~ lC..f (, tt ze,3 " 'o "L.<o-f 7) i<.. z.. 1'2... 'l.(, f l) 't~(,. 1'-1 2 <, f l~ "2.11-7~ i{, l £> 1..(,0 71 z..v-f 17 1..(, lo 19 ?..~'° "1f l~v 14 2.(,) 1 '1 U,'-{ 1'1 v..:,. l 't Ve-[ 11" Z.{~ 1< --...... ~ I Y, Efn. (,o s:r 55 5 Ii 5 '-I 5'1 55 ~o s~ 5~ 5~ 55 (, ~ I_ 7 - ~( tr l loo f.&,O 51 5"t 5<f Sc;- sq CoO ,~ ..... DGM Temp (T.) Out In "7 C. 17 7~ 17 l(p 11 71 11 7B 76 1~ 19 ,~ 1~ 1) T{ 7) 1) 7<., l(, 1~ :,-1-- ~~ ':1-=r 7j 7~ 7 't 1 'i 1'-{ 11 \) 1(,.. 7<.. 11 11 7'0 71 7"{ 1<t 80 7"t f5o ~o ~l 0o t?~ ~, 8'2,, 0. I e,-, + N O J S1i ;I z. /I ,ck Diameter /t7, 1 F Port ReferencekZ__ L' I/ Po: ,rts are P '1' Upstream from next disturbance ,rts are IJ :>-11 Downs1ream from last disturbance ~ Assumed Moisture 25-30 % Probe Cs, t) V • l Cp 0.84 Nozzle Calibration .:)11.. .,/2... __:,2,)2.. .?712..- Avg D0 •".) l 1-inches GasBag (J.. ·O+ Console ] Y-Facror /; C:f;J t>H@ /,.GJ,;. in H,O Barometric Press~ Pbm 'l.. 'i · ") L_ in Hg Pb0 2,y, 3'1..-in Hg P0 -''2> I in H10 Leak Check· Pre ft'/m,n o.o(~ vaconHs...1.Q,Q Pito1 Rate O • 0 In H,O .fi·0 Pos1 o -003' IO·O 0 . 'v 6,'D --.~ ... Water Collected / 7 { , li _____ l!..__g ~ Time Sampled J].... min ~'fo~ Review ~ 11 .1,_ ✓ K ~ @Tm K ~ @Tm S (1.0'2,,, Field Data Sheet TETCO F,lterilil_ Sample Box_Q__ Page _l _or_\_ Run# l- Plant: Staker, Duchesne, UT Location: b <... (\ c..o ( ~"' ~ ~Ov>-t.... A ,6 Date "'\ { U>-Z.l ['t 3 Traverse Time DGM t.P t.H t"'H,01 Vacuum Pomt Clock Min (0) en', (n il:()} Desired Actual (i,,H,:) 1 1S5v 0 5r}.C.,o1, . lf" t.-~~ l ,C...) y 2 2,-{ c:;u., .)2.< .-z.y Z.,f 7, 2.f'!, '1 3 S..o ~ .(.30 .2,3, 7..•-r~ 2-·"1:> y 4 1,? 59/, .<t(o . t.O "•\ z.. 2..1 z. '{ 5 10.0 51:3~ .tll..S" · l9' 2-.o1.. ? _.o 'Z-'{ 6 1z_.< 5g{_ 1-~t> .l ~ 2,.07--Z...o'Z.-~ 7 ,{i> 5~_0'.}-0 •·2.0 't -1'2... '2.. I '2-L{ 8 11.-r' 5'1e. 4'.k) ·'2-4 2-• 5S 1.,{{ t.j 9 u,. 0 5~3 110 ·'2..1-2-Sr t -~1-'1 10 12,. (' 59:f l{D • •1-.'1 2.s1--'Z.-~1-4 11 1.< .0 5~A .r.-t{c ,"2.1 2 ·'b1-1.-8+ I.(_ 12 n ., ~ol. l~O ri i,. 1., 1-1.. Z,.1-<, <{ 1 '.3o.o ~o3 .~<B -~D -; . IG\ 3.l't 5 2 1 .. 2.., f.o" .(.Io •'2.1 '2,'o~ 2.-'81-5 3 35,0 C:.(f\. '{oo .z. ~ 1..--.'{ z.. 'i 'I-5 4 ~., <..11,0(..o ,'l.} z.. '-i'\ 1,.1it 5 5 'to ~14 ,4.00 ,I °f 2,.0'2,. 1..0-Z.. t; 6 4Z...1 bl(., •171 • t "I 2.o-Z.. 2,.oz. 5 7 5;55 <lf.o <ol 9' .oi..o ·'2.0 2,..-< ( '2. 2,. \ '2, 5 8 t.{'.1-,-[ c..z.z..110 , Z.I 2..1,.~ 1.,'2-') 5 9 So.o vz.c{ -s~c .?,0 . .,__ \'2.. 1.. \ 'Z. 5 10 ~2.1"' l,1.1-{ · °TlQ .2-1 7.,2-3 2..'2.3 5 11 SSIO C.-Z..'1.l"IO .iz. l -3'\ 1, ')'f 5 12 57,,(' <o1 l. G.{o , t-z._. 2 •'3 <\ 'Z..J4 5 I q_:10 (.o.o (,3~. ~~., Total Avcrag_<:_ C..o.l.'.l-3 ✓ 1L~I{_\(..✓ ~B .lfo.,... • "ez.. v- S<:i.24i ✓• '\~~ 1.. lll-;, Operator: I'-"\. , ,Y ~ ,,J rJM. c./ CA, Temperatures m Stack (T,) Probe 2.ri .. .2,(. '3> Uo 1,CoO Z..<tB u.z '2.\lq. z..c.,1 2.'H 2.C...> "2.'t r 2.Co.3 '2..'ij U.1-- vie z..C.,"' 1.<fl' 2.C, '1 i.rt-1.fal. 'Z.I.( (.. 2-~9 'l ~ z... Z.{0 2-38 u..5 Z.3<t 'l-"5 ZY) 24,8 z. J<t 2<-o 2.38 '24t 2-38 i.4 \ z:~8 -Z..C[lp 2.l!O 1.<.,' z. 3 / HY z. ~I z-rz.. 2.3-=,-2.fo 2. t.{ t z..y{ SSoi.. ✓ 1-'-\l-4D CPM Oven Filter Z...4£l c,e 2.C(f (., '? l.3"l 11 z.n, 1,o 2.{z.. 10 2.C,'t 1o ur 70 2-1-0 11 v.e 12.. Z<o"f TL ZbO '73 2/o~ 1'f l(. / 74 Zro 1t 2{).. C..'t 2(1.:> <.,fl 2tt0 <:.8 2.tj:f-(.,1, Z-(9 <.,{3 Z.('1 <,,-S Z..{<% (,~ 2.C..0 (o 1- z. f 9 (, r -Z.<,I ·(,, 't Effi. ~, ~f ~c: G, ( LI <..o 5q 59 '19 5~ r.o co 51- S'> 53 5.3 ~'1 S.5 55 '-f~ 4'7 Sf 52. <; 2,. OGM Temp (T .) Out In 1 I 77 71 7') ,t, 1-.,q 1e ~ 1'! -oz. 9t----Ss @o Si $\ 6{ 63 ,~ (),7, I ~ 8, i e ~7, f3A 87 05 tsZ. 01', ij 5 1?11-- ~\ 8:f- ~~ ~'..l-' ~'t, 8~ 6-f 0:).- (,2,. "'" <,3 (,'3 <.:,3 <,,f (,~ r,(p ~-r ~8 ~u -tL Stack Diameter 1:.0 • t-) I( Port Reference 2. 1/ 0 Ports are G.'/ I, Upstream from next disturbance Ports arc 13 Z." Downstream from last disturbance Assumed Moisture 25-30 % Probe bO l7 -'2... Cp 0.84 Nozzle Calibration .)/-) .')(.-( .1.,e,.'{ ."}(,.~ ---- Avg D, • 1(,5° 0 inches GasBag A-or Console _7" __ _ Y-Factor l.oo 3 ~,Jc, t'(,31 t.H@ t . '-'3" in H,O . ( '2.LI• tO Barometric Pr~ures " w[z.) Pbm 2.'-\ · ?>:> in Hg 9J1.dr3 Pb, z_'-{.3-z.. in Hg llj.11- p" -• J I . ~-in 1110 ~~:J/3 Leak Check. Pre fl'lm,n 0 -0(0 vac on Hg Z.0-0 Pitot Rate O • 0 lnH,O 0.D Post -......-0 -0/') lZ. ·'O o ·O 0 -0 Water Collected 15 '-l. B g Time Sampled (,,o min )-::re(.. ✓ l'o ,C\ Revie\\' ~ K = @Tm K = @Tm Comment$' Shv4-d~f\ e, 11;.:;r f'cir ~ 6 (,-e oc fo:I\C.. O~f"'\ Q~~i:-'?,),~~c.. ?on• e. <,11 .oz.o D'M. '2, (..n!,_,>C l,=_,.J.( ... (.~I<.. toz.o .002- L<_..._~ <-'-<<.I(_ ~..Jt,.L •l o. 0 :,, ~ ~ 1,-ki ~ ✓""-£..:£-f: k> ,1-9 ( 2..l (z..} ci-20 ~ 2.'.) ,-lo 'ffve,L(. 5, jZ_e,',¼<>-t+-8! S5A. <\lz.l(t.~ z.o e-o FM)_ field Data Sheet TETCO Filler 1C.'lJ2__ Sample Box~ Page _l_or __ l Run# 3 Plant Staker, Duchesne, UT Date f( t. / 'L-) Traverse Time DGM 6P 6H r~"PI Vacuum Point Clock Min(0) cf'I'> (all.:<}} Desired A 1 "1 .3-J 0 C.31'. 1{2-, 7 I I. Cifl4 2 / 1 ,") C. 31-.q (!)() ,-z...1-1-~7 3 S-o o'-lo,'Z.)0 ,1,0 I· '-1\Q 4 ?.( ... ~1.r2< ,2.0 l · ~1, 5 co .<> i,p•f~.<. +O .cq I r~C\ 6 q ,.{ ~~f.+10 • I cf I , 1<\ 7 \)~ to~i..s~o ' '2.lo \ • 9(:) 8 11 ,') I~ lf't.<,<,5 ,,z:( \ -~3 9 1.o.o <..) I •'Hr • Z.1-18~ 10 l-1,.~ <P5 l{ I '2-30 ,26 I-~~ 11 'l,.-,~ re f(p . s, r 'i<e I . <? "l 12 'l.1 -~ C.{€1 ,{~O I 2'l 2.o(o $3. 1 lo'.o) '!,o .0 ~~' 1?(,, . '2-ct' 2·o<o 2 bi...( ""). 010 I '21--I -'t~ 3 'iS.<> (,(,$ .3~0 I 'Li" 1-~'o 4 ,1 .{ ~b 1-. (..(O I 12.., 1..,~ 5 "{o.O le~ 1 .?·C,O 'i.t.. t.·P - 6 '-\1,.; (., 71 . ,Z.:f . I °I l •7> 7 'i.( ,0 (.. 13. -:;..'1-9 • I 'f \ ')) 8 'l':\.( (1,-_f'. 1-iao . ,., I ,'!){ 9 ')o.O lo 11.<C...O •lo (,'13 10 5t.f l ,tt . 410 • 1, 1., I,()- 11 55,v (.,~\.L\C.o •'Z..~ I•<, 'i 12 51. { Co°o,, 1-,0 . 1.,l \.{O 1l:o~ ~ i-..o <te'3." j~ Total J So .\'o\o -J \\·'-1"1"' / Average_ ✓ ,'-{,'\\ Commen<s ?,~~f7hv't ~f\ 10·,1,~ l--{\o tvl\ ie*~@ io :/0 Actual (MH,) 1.'5W 4 1,,:t-<-t l •'-1(,., 't I ·<fl,, tj l,Jq ~ ( ')°{ ~ 1-'lO y 1-83 ~ 1-'f~ l.( l ·<f~ y 1-9'1 ~ Z -o(p '1 -Z.-ok, ~ 1.ci~ 'i \. <t~ lf l,{l-y 1,·n ... ~ I. °3>) 4 \•:,') ~ 1,3:( i \.'-I°?) ~ ,.~~ 4 I , C..'f 4 1,-iO L-( 3'\ .~10 / \.~V> Location (p~A CPr !Ji r:bc: 1'A-Q Operator: M. 'K.(_,., \I,,\ I!;, ,'\,.,.;\.v.lc,. Temperatures ('>) CPM Stack (T,) Probe Oven Filter Effi. i..1 1 'Z.(,o 1-Yo It, ( S5 1.1+ 1,~~ 1.-\.\ '{ i-f S1 7~80 l<a9 1,y-{ ~{ S-z, '2-"'.1-5 1..~'Z.,. 1..-(0 <o-( .so i:n, Z.. 'to 2. f't <-t-r' So 'Z,<..'o Z.3~ U,1..,... " ) 5o 1.!o) 1.'t ~ i<o,.. (p') s , ?,<p-{ 2.'i '\ 2)1"' G,~ S( 7...~ 1-2.v<o l<. I ~c., St -z.." 'i' 7-<, I 2(,0 ~ -=/-50 -z. <o<t 'l.('\ z..<,O CP1--So tJ.:,b ,z.{{ 2,G,i:o ~'o SI z. {C(_ i.{\ i<o-=r Cot, 63 2,1.,0 7.,?J 1,(.) ~e> .so 1.C.O 1.c...2,.. Z.(otp &0 So '2l, I 'l,<,'f-u,Q ~ ) 5( 7..1,?...., l.~ U'o c..1 ~ ) 2- -U.. l 2.<-B ¼'i c,'6 51-- i C... I.{ 7 <, i tC..6 G,?:'.} 53 2..~ -r 1,c-8 -z<,y (.,fl 5.1 7_7,,+ 2.<..8 U.f;, (.. (, 55 1'11.. 1-1{ 1,(, (,., C..l, So 1.{ \ 't)'t l.c,.~ ~<,. 'f ~ '2. ('\ 2,30 -u,'{ (,.,{o So ~)}'v ✓ 1,~) . 1b DGM Temp <T-l Out In , 2-13 7J ,'-t 1~ 7 'f 74 l~ -r·{ 7-S 1(,., 1't l-71-00 78 ~l 79 &3 '60 83 60 Slf l,( ~) !;?..--e ") 83 8b ca'l, fl,-- 84 e~ g '{ Bl' ~) e~ 0:r ';'O 01-<t I e-z., 83 '61... 8., Sz-a-,, e11. 84 No /I J.;; // Stack Diameter G 0. 7 f Port Reference ,d r Ports are P '1 I'/ Upstream from next disturba~ Ports are / J, )-I, Downstream from last disturbance Assumed Moisture 25-30 % Probe c.o <, • \ Cp 0.84 Nozzle Calibration -33<? .'.}~ ·Y>"I .'!>3"f Avg D, • ):l,'i' O inches Gas Bag ~o 1"" Console --2_ Y-Fac1or Jc t:7'2-,,'- aH@ I, t?J77 n H20 Barometric Pressures Pbm i.l.l,'t.O in Hg Pb0 2 '-\ · 1 1'" in Hg Pc; -• ) \ in H,0 Le4k ("heck Pre Post ft''imin o .o/0 <!>• oo'l- vacin Hg~ 4.0 Pi,o, Rate O -00 o.O In H,O .ft-> ~-'i> Water Collected tl,.l.,,L Time Sampled (, 0 g min °)'{10 / i1.5 Review K- K ~ ~ @Tm @Tm C APPENDIX C Laboratory Data and Chain of Custody Sample Recovery PM Analysis Lab Sheets Condensable Particulate Matter Analysis Lab Sheets Gas Analysis Data (ORSAT) Method 9 Forms (VEO) Chain of Custody M202 l111pin~cr Field Sheet Facility:...:S:...:1:...:ak:...:c:...:'r ____________________ _ Stack ldentilication: ----------------------- Date: --------Method: -------- li\JP!NGrns Run: Sample Box: Filter Number: lmprn gcr Number Initials 1c, {-z_ 2 J 4 5 6 Initial Volume ofliquid (11:0) 111 i111p111gers, (ml) Final (g) _'t.:..L.....:..:i.:.....4,.::.>£.L.r-'--l-7!....1,:.'3:.•:..,,!:>~I---J=--L.:...:L---1~------1----- ln itial (g) ..:3"-"'-!:C..:.:"'--4.!,:__:....:...,,,..,_-1--7<..>..!.l :..,.Jc..._-1-....u=.:=....+-----+---- l 1,. 0 om /jhcr dcscrjoljon Purge start 12-3 ~ Purge end l !. '. 3 (... ml 1120 added J( IMPINGERS Filter Number: 7 <,.5.3 weigh & analyse I weigh and discard Total (g) l 1( • 'j =====:!== Hexane Run: "2-Sample J:3ox: --~_;_ __ 2 lmi ngcr Number I 4 ! 5 6 Initial Volume ofliquid (I 110) in i111p111gers. (ml) nm G Her descriotion Final (g)....:..._..___,=--l---'~::......:.+-~-=-~""-1--....:::....:..::..:,...+----+---- lnitial (g) ~+-=-..__~-"---'--:;__4----=.. __ 1--c...:..,,"--'--=--+----+---- Net lg)-:fd.~~bb!!~~="==~~=!=~~~.b===k=== weigh & analyse weigh and discard Purge start Purge end IMP!NGERS Filter Number: 7(,54 om Oller descriotion Purge start I l '. 1,Q Purge end l'Z.'. 1.0 ml H20 added f: Run: Total (i;) \ f 4. f, ==========!a== Acetone l lexanl' 3 Sample Box: (_, 2 lm~ngcr l'il um6cr 3 I 4 ! 5 <, lmt1aJ Volume ofliquid (1110) in impingcrs, (ml) 100 SG Acetone I lexanc Initials Facility:Date: Stack Identification:Run:1 Filter Number:7652 Sample Box:A Blanks &Blanks Rinses Rinses Acetone (CH3COCH3)0.0000 g/100ml Acetone (CH3COCH3)100 ml Filter Final1:0.6488 g Date:9/25/23 Time:10:00 Final2:0.6486 g Date:9/26/23 Time:9:00 FinalAVG:0.6487 g Filter Preweight:0.6464 g CRITERIA Net 0.0023 g Process Weight Time Net 2.3 mg Final Pass Pass Front Half Final1:97.0666 g Date:9/25/23 Time:10:00 Final2:97.0665 g Date:9/26/23 Time:9:00 FinalAVG:97.0666 g Initial1:97.0614 g Date:12/8/22 Time:8:00 Initial2:97.0612 g Date:12/9/22 8:00 InitialAVG:97.0613 g Gross:0.0053 g CRITERIA Beaker Number:55 Blank:0.0000 g Process Weight Time Net 0.0053 g Final Pass Pass Net 5.3 mg Initial Pass Pass RESULTS Front Half Filter 2.3 mg Wash 5.3 mg Total 7.6 mg Comments:Criteria: 1) Weights are ± 0.5 mg of each other, or within 1% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings. Lab Technician:Date:9/25/23 Lab Technician:Date:9/26/23 M.Mcnamara D. Kitchen Staker, Duchesne, UT. Gencor Baghouse 8/20/23 II Facility:Staker, Duchesne, UT.Date:8/20-21/23 Stack Identification:Gencor Baghouse Run:2 Filter Number:7653 Sample Box:B Blanks &Blanks Rinses Rinses Acetone (CH3COCH3)0.0000 g/100ml Acetone (CH3COCH3)125 ml Filter Final1:0.6398 g Date:9/25/23 Time:10:00 Final2:0.6398 g Date:9/26/23 Time:9:00 FinalAVG:0.6398 g Filter Preweight:0.6416 g CRITERIA Net -0.0018 g Process Weight Time Net -1.8 mg Final Pass Pass Front Half Final1:122.4330 g Date:9/25/23 Time:10:00 Final2:122.4334 g Date:9/26/23 Time:9:00 FinalAVG:122.4332 g Initial1:122.4253 g Date:12/8/22 Time:8:00 Initial2:122.4254 g Date:12/9/22 Time:8:00 InitialAVG:122.4254 g Gross:0.0078 g CRITERIA Beaker Number:56 Blank:0.0000 g Process Weight Time Net 0.0078 g Final Pass Pass Net 7.8 mg Initial Pass Pass RESULTS Front Half Filter -1.8 mg Wash 7.8 mg Total 6.0 mg Comments:Criteria: 1) Weights are ± 0.5 mg of each other, or within 1% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings. Lab Technician:M.Mcnamara Date:9/25/23 Lab Technician:D. Kitchen Date:9/26/23 Facility:Staker, Duchesne, UT.Date:8/21/23 Stack Identification:Gencor Baghouse Run:3 Filter Number:7654 Sample Box:C Blanks &Blanks Rinses Rinses Acetone (CH3COCH3)0.0000 g/100ml Acetone (CH3COCH3)135 ml Filter Final1:0.6537 g Date:9/25/23 Time:10:00 Final2:0.6533 g Date:9/26/23 Time:9:00 FinalAVG:0.6535 g Filter Preweight:0.6521 g CRITERIA Net 0.0014 g Process Weight Time Net 1.4 mg Final Pass Pass Front Half Final1:124.7150 g Date:9/25/23 Time:10:00 Final2:124.7153 g Date:9/26/23 Time:9:00 FinalAVG:124.7152 g Initial1:124.7064 g Date:12/8/22 Time:8:00 Initial2:124.7064 g Date:12/9/22 Time:8:00 InitialAVG:124.7064 g Gross:0.0088 g CRITERIA Beaker Number:1 Blank:0.0000 g Process Weight Time Net 0.0088 g Final Pass Pass Net 8.8 mg Initial Pass Pass RESULTS Front Half Filter 1.4 mg Wash 8.8 mg Total 10.2 mg Comments:Criteria: 1) Weights are ± 0.5 mg of each other, or within 1% of the net weight. 2) There shall be at least 6 hrs between weighings. Lab Technician:M.Mcnamara Date:9/25/23 Lab Technician:D. Kitchen Date:9/26/23 Facilty: Stack Identification:Test Date(s): Sample Description/ID # Inorganic CPM Beaker/Tin #538 Date Time Rel. Hum %539 Date Time Rel. Hum %540 Date Time Rel. Hum % Final Weight (1), g 2.2785 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2737 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2600 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 Final Weight (2), g 2.2782 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2732 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2600 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2784 2.2735 2.2600 Initial Weight (1), g 2.2564 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2389 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2358 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 Initial Weight (2), g 2.2562 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2386 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2356 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2563 2.2388 2.2357 mr: Initial Inorganic Wt, mg 22.05 34.70 24.30 H2O added in Extractions, ml 60 pH pH 60 pH pH 60 pH pH Reconstituted H2O Volume, ml Start End Start End Start End N: Normality of NH4OH Vt: Volume of NH4OH, ml mc: Mass of NH4 Added, mg mi (or mib): Final Inorganic Wt, mg 22.05 34.70 24.30 Organic CPM Beaker/Tin #541 Date Time Rel. Hum %542 Date Time Rel. Hum %543 Date Time Rel. Hum % Final Weight (1), g 2.2520 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2872 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2633 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 Final Weight (2), g 2.2520 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2873 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2635 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2520 2.2873 2.2634 Initial Weight (1), g 2.2308 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2514 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2569 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 Initial Weight (2), g 2.2307 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2512 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2568 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2308 2.2513 2.2569 mo (or mob): Net Organic Wt, mg 21.25 35.95 6.55 mcpm : Gross CPM, mg 43.3 70.7 30.9 mcpm : Blank CPM, mg 1.1 1.1 1.1 mcpm : Net CPM, mg 42.2 69.6 29.7 pH Meter: Oakton pHTestr BNC, Electrode Model: 35801-00 pH Date Time Lab Technician:Date:9/22/23 Fisher pH Buffer 4.00 Fisher pH Buffer 7.00 Lab Technician:Date:9/29/23 10/21/15Form Date: Method 202 Laboratory Form Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 9/20-21/23 Staker, Duchesne, UT Gencor Baghouse M. McNamara Dean Kitchen Facilty: Stack Identification:Test Date(s):9/20-21/23 Sample Description/ID # Inorganic CPM Beaker/tin #544 Date Time Rel. Hum %545 Date Time Rel. Hum % Final Weight (1), g 2.2415 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2329 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 Final Weight (2), g 2.2415 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2329 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2415 2.2329 Initial Weight (1), g 2.2415 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2325 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 Initial Weight (2), g 2.2414 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2324 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2415 2.2325 mr: Initial Inorganic Wt, mg 0.05 0.45 H2O added in Extractions, ml 60 pH pH 60 pH pH Reconstituted H2O Volume, ml Start End Start End N: Normality of NH4OH Vt: Volume of NH4OH, ml mc: Mass of NH4 Added, mg mi (or mib): Final Inorganic Wt, mg 0.05 0.45 Organic CPM Beaker/tin #546 Date Time Rel. Hum %547 Date Time Rel. Hum % Final Weight (1), g 2.2349 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2552 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 Final Weight (2), g 2.2347 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2555 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2348 2.2554 Initial Weight (1), g 2.2340 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2543 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 Initial Weight (2), g 2.2335 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2539 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2338 2.2541 mo (or mob): Net Organic Wt, mg 1.05 1.25 mcpm (or mfb): Total CPM, mg 1.1 1.7 pH Meter: Oakton pHTestr BNC, Electrode Model: 35801-00 pH Date Time Lab Tech.:Date:9/22/23 Fisher pH Buffer 4.00 Fisher pH Buffer 7.00 Lab Tech.:Date:9/29/23 10/21/15Form Date: Method 202 Laboratory Form Recovery Blank Proof Blank Staker, Duchesne, UT Gencor Baghouse M. McNamara Dean Kitchen Facilty: Stack Identification:Test Date(s): Blank Description/ID #Water Acetone Hexane Lot #1111A24 216541 MKCR0528 Beaker/tin #548 Date Time Rel. Hum %549 Date Time Rel. Hum %550 Date Time Rel. Hum % Final Weight (1), g 2.2599 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2542 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2706 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 Final Weight (2), g 2.2599 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2542 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2706 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2599 2.2542 2.2706 Initial Weight (1), g 2.2600 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2543 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2705 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 Initial Weight (2), g 2.2597 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2541 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 2.2706 12/13/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2599 2.2542 2.2706 Blank Residual Mass, mg 0.05 Water 0.00 Acetone 0.05 Hexane Blank Mass, g 232 180 152 Blank Volume, ml 232 229 228 Max Blank Residulal Mass, mg 0.23 0.23 0.23 Lab Technician:Date:9/22/23 Lab Technician:Date:9/29/23 10/21/15Form Date: Method 202 Field Reagent Blank Form 9/20-21/23 Staker, Duchesne, UT Gencor Baghouse Fisher ACS Sigma- AldrichRICCA Reagent M. McNamara Dean Kitchen Blank Description/ID #Water Acetone Hexane Lot #1111A24 216541 MKCR0528 Beaker/tin #551 Date Time Rel. Hum %552 Date Time Rel. Hum %553 Date Time Rel. Hum % Final Weight (1), g 2.2313 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2254 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 2.2355 9/29/23 8:00 < 1 Final Weight (2), g 2.2312 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2253 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 2.2359 10/12/23 10:00 < 1 Ave. Final Weight, g 2.2313 2.2254 2.2357 Initial Weight (1), g 2.2314 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2255 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 2.2358 12/12/22 14:00 < 1 Initial Weight (2), g 2.2311 12/13/22 10:00 < 1 2.2252 12/13/22 10:00 < 1 2.2354 12/13/22 10:00 < 1 Ave. Initial Weight, g 2.2313 2.2254 2.2356 Blank Residual Mass, mg 0.00 Water 0.00 Acetone 0.10 Hexane Blank Mass, g 220 175 168 Blank Volume, ml 220 223 252 Max Blank Residulal Mass, mg 0.22 0.22 0.25 Lab Technician:Date:9/22/23 Lab Technician:Date: 10/21/15 Method 202 Laboratory Reagent Blank Form RICCA Reagent Supelco Sigma-Aldrich Form Date: M. McNamara Dean Kitchen VEO--Single Source Observer: Jo.seoi--t o. We 11.5 • Date: Z.O Seo+. 2.o 23 • Facility: Staker, Duchesne, UT Location: 6e YI C.Q y-(3 c,...._§ /-/ Q I.A,5e Time: Start I/: ~5 End 15 :06 Min Seconds Min Seconds Min II Seconds 0 15 30 45 0 15 30 45 0 15 30 I 45 0 0 0 0 0 * 20 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 () n 41 0 n r) 0 2 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 42 0 () n n 3 0 0 0 0 23 0 (j 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 24 (1 0 -(J a 44 (> 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 25 0 0 n n 45 0 (1 () n 6 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 n n 46 {'") () 0 n 7 cJ 0 0 27 () (') (1 0 47 0 n 0 D 8 0 0 0 0 28 {) n 0 0 48 n (') r) 0 9 0 0 0 29 (') n 0 0 49 r) 0 () 0 10 0 0 30 0 0 -C) 0 50 () () n cl 11 0 6 31 0 5 0 0 51 0 () 0 0 12 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 52 () 0 0 D 13 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 53 0 () CJ 0 14 0 0 0 0 * 34 0 0 0 0 54 () r, 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 35 n 0 0 0 55 ,___ 0 0 D n 16 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 - 17 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 D 18 CJ 0 38 <) {) 0 0 58 0 0 0 n * 19 0 0 5 0 39 0 0 0 6 59 0 0 0 0 ORIENTATION: IN At start of observations 0 Source Height 30 feet *1 Sun ~1 Wind Direction Speed 5 mph +1 Observation Point Distance from source lfo feet Background 13toun 1--f ,'t / I W ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-0-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-F . At end of observations *2 Sun ~2 Wind Direction Speed z_ mph +2 Observation Point \ 1 +, '-z.. + l Distance from source /bO feet Background f3 / ¼e s I< t1 *.z. Observer: ,lo<e eh o. t.Je I JS Facility: Staker, Duchesne, UT Time: Start I 5 : .5 0 Min Seconds Min 0 15 30 45 LJ 0 0 0 0 0 20 I 0 0 0 0 21 2 0 0 0 0 22 3 0 0 0 0 23 4 _r; 5 .5 5 24 5 0 0 5 0 25 ----6 0 0 s 0 26 7 0 .5 5 0 27 8 c; 5 0 0 28 9 0 5 0 n 29 10 _s 0 0 0 30 II 0 0 0 0 31 -12 0 n () 5 32 -13 5 0 0 0 33 14 0 5 5 0 34 15 0 0 0 0 35 16 0 0 0 0 36 17 0 5 (') 0 37 ----18 0 0 0 0 38 19 l; J; 0 5 39 ORIENTATION: At start of observations 0 Source Height Jo *, Sun f-, Wind Direction Speed 5 +, Observation Point Distance from source 12..0 Background [} lv.e,_ SI<~ At end of observations *2 Sun ~2 Wind Direction +2 Observation Point Speed g {l..tA,'\ z VEO--Single Source Date: 2 0 ~e, of. Z.o 2 3 I Seconds Min Seconds 0 15 30 45 0 15 I 30 45 .5 ~ 0 0 40 5 5 5 a i:; 0 (? 0 41 0 0 E 5 r, 5 r) {) 42 r) 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 43 () 0 D 0 0 5 5 0 44 .5 (J 0 0 5 0 E {') 45 0 0 0 0 0 a t> 0 46 {) 0 s 0 0 0 0 5 47 rJ 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 49 0 n 0 0 50 5 5 .E s 51 s '"' 0 0 52 0 () () ri 53 0 {) 0 (j 54 (") 0 0 0 55 ,1 n (') (") 56 -n n () () 57 n 0 0 0 58 0 0 n C) 59 1N feet mph feet mph I w ·+·-·-·-·+::-·-·-·-·-0-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-~- z. \ 2. ! t. f-! I f\ I Distance from source J l. 5 feet Background 8 1 '-" e, ,.$ k ~ VEO--Single Source Observer: ,Jc, s e p h O CJ e { /,S Facility: Staker, Duchesne, UT Date: 2./ .5e of J Zo z..3 Location: C:,e.VlCQ,t' l3ct3 HovSe 1me: Start O 'l[ · .5 _5 End oq: 11 Min Seconds Min 0 15 30 45 0 0 5 /6 {O to 20 I /6 lo lo l-S 21 -2 ID l o Lo 5 22 3 ,c; 5 5 J; 23 4 0 r'J 0 0 24 5 0 ,,; 0 s 25 6 z; () '> (') 26 7 0 0 () c; 27 8 r; 5 z; 0 28 -9 0 0 0 s 29 10 s (\ ,; 5 30 II ,c; n _i; s 31 12 ,:; 0 5 5 32 13 0 0 0 0 33 14 0 0 0 D 34 -15 0 0 0 0 35 - 16 36 17 37 18 38 19 39 ORIENTATION: At start of observations 0 Source Height J o feet *1 Sun ~, Wind Direction Speed 2. mph +, Observation Point Distance from source J C,o feet Background Cz re.en Tte,e,,~ At end of observations *2 Sun ~2 Wind Direction +2 Observation Point Speed O mph Distance from source I i;, c, feet Background C.'Y" C:e:r:'.\ T v'e. C 5 Seconds Min Seconds 15 30 45 0 15 30 45 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 IN I I F w -------------<? +,,,. ;, - is LoY\f-iYll.,\.e..J ft.CA/\ 2, f,-.o~ 1.o Su-I-.. Z.o2.3 "'-"'-d, f'i-...,;s~o ft,,,e,-lc,-..sf 15/11,:/\CAm VEO--Single Source Observer: ;[o se ph dJ. lJe I { .5 Date: 2./ .Seof-. 2.02.3 -=~~--=-1,~----'=-=-"----' Facility: Staker, Duchesne, UT Time: Start 09 : ~ 3 End / I: 00 Min Seconds Min Seconds Min Seconds 0 15 30 45 0 15 30 45 0 15 30 45 0 0 0 D 0 20 0 0 0 0 40 -n 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 21 C, 5 0 0 4 1 0 0 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 n 42 () {) 5 0 3 0 0 0 C) 23 " 0 0 0 43 n (1 n () 4 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 n 44 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 n 25 0 i; () 0 45 0 0 0 0 6 a 0 0 c) 26 () '1 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 27 n 0 s 0 47 () (} 0 0 8 5 28 0 0 0 0 48 () 0 0 ("';:, 9 0 () 29 _z; 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 -10 () 30 0 0 0 0 50 0 -0 (j 0 II 0 0 0 0 3 1 n 0 0 {) 51 () 0 0 0 - 12 0 0 0 0 32 0 .5 0 (") 52 n 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 n 53 0 0 0 s 14 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 36 0 () ('-) 0 56 n n 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 37 n 0 a 0 57 r) (7) 0 C) - 18 cJ 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 - 19 0 0 0 c) 39 0 0 C) 0 59 0 0 0 0 ORIENTATION: IN At start of observations 0 Source Height 3o feel ., Sun ~, Wind Direction Speed 2.. mph +, Obscrvmion Point Distance from source l00 feel Background 03 (Q(,JV\ Hi I I I W ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-0-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-F . At end of observations *2 Sun ~2 Wind Direction + 2 Observation Point Speed .5 mph Distance from source / G O feet Background (4) h j +:e. Tower ; r 12. I f-, i s ~ 10 : 1..3 Plo-f'\t She....+ dow>1,£ RLAY\ 3 5-f-of Ped lo : 'i9 Pl°'n+ re.rteL,,JeJ ofe.'l'c>-t,'on.s, t, flv..~ 3 (.,o.,.-,f,'"'"'ed Plant 5 +°'-.K. '{, r Analytical Method: Date 9/i,dz..) Test No. I Gas Bag No. -,~..--_-0--=T'c-- Ambient Temp _]..._½_,__ __ Operator ~- Date '1lt~t.."!J Test No. -Z.. -:--=---Gas Bag No. I>., o ':/- Ambient Temp _-,~'( __ _ Operator ~ Dale °t/Uf~ Test No. 3 --=--Gas Bag No. b,. o'"¼- Ambicnt Temp 1: 5 Operator p_A. Gas CO2 0 2 (Net is Actual 0 2 Reading Minus Actual CO2 Reading). N2 (Net is 100 Minus Actual 0 2 Reading). GaI CO2 0 2 (Net is Actual 0 2 Reading M inus Actual CO2 Reading). N2 (Net is 100 Minus Actual 0 2 Reading). Gas CO2 0 2 (Net is Actual 0 2 Reading Minus Actual CO2 Reading). N2 (Net is 100 Minus Actual 02 Reading). I Actual Net Reading . ')_.Q 7.,. 0 I 5.:}-\ ?>.1-- I Actu~1I Net Re:tdinl! 1.6 2,. <o lt,, (6 13 -~ I Actu.11 Net lle.:ulinA ~.~ 3.~ n .l.{ u.~ ·<· .< Location RUN 2 3 Average Actual Ner Actual Net Net Reading tleading Volume z.o 2 .0 -z_. 0 z...o z..o \f. "+-l3,+ 11-~ n .+ \1•1-- . -· < ·.·, · .. · RUN 2 3 Average Actual NCI Actmll Net Nel Reading !leading Volume 2-~ z.~ -z.. i -i.~ z.~ \(... (.. \ :}. Q) llo.lo n . 'O \~-~ '.,., 1.:t::·• .•:.f: < ·' , (";,,t,i)!li; :fr RUN 2 3 A vcragc Actual Net Actual Net Net Reading Reading Volume ) ,(, 7, .G. 3 . <.:, "!>. c., "3. \o l1, 't \'3 .~ 11 ,'\ 13,5 11.~ ; ti~1::3_i(i .. ·-,. RUN ,1-----.------n-----2.----tl-----.-3----it Average Net Date ----Test No. ----Gas Bag No. ___ _ Ambient Temp ___ _ Operator ___ _ Gas 0 2 (Net is Actual 02 Reading Minus Actual CO2 Reading). N2 (Net is I 00 Minus Actual 0 2 Reading). Actu:ll Reading Nc1 Ac1ual Net Reading CO is not measured, as it has the same molecular weight as Aclual Net Reading Volume TETCO Faci lity (& Source): 5 +OI..C..\L.<r" t> "°"-.,c.,.5 (\~ J vi' c,..J+ &~-(\..( n r Ba~ ~SJ - Sample ID Date iwd 9.{ zo{z) e.o V\""> '7. [ .,,. -'U{t,J 2..0t'"\""t. q/i,t\ '2.,~ Woo~ ~lo-t'\ vL o..t u, Ii') e~co\J~("'( ~ \cu\ l,L 'l/'2S> /?_"?, (. : e., ~ ~A .. ~~.\-~l~\L. 'llwl~ Stack Emission Ana lysis Accurate • Reliable • Qualified Chain of Custodr_ 1> ~ "' c::: c::: i;2 c::: ., .c. Vl V, ,<:! V> ·= ~ .c. <ti .c. "' 3 0::: ' u <ti ~ 3 ~ V u § ::c ..c: .... ..c: 0 V> E ~ <ti .... .... u o,:l c::: 3 0 u.. M u: <ii "' ... V 4J 0. Method(s) of u. C/l u c::: 2 c .... L!... ~ 9 ., "' 0 a. 2 ·= ~ '-' Analysis 0 0.. N u 0 u. u. u 0.. u ::r: < ~ 5/ Z.0'2.. 'f-)( "'f 1 'f 5h-o7 'f i-1 1-'"f. 5( z.01.-r-i r '{-~ 5/..,_~ 7_ 'f. t 'f. 5/?.-.? r-r-l'l' Sampled By: ,t,./J ;i'• ., ~ c....lA.c,.;t__ \ M '-.,'1.~ ~ t;t_ Jill. A _. • /'I v- Recovered By: o ... -V\ l,(,.,~(.,\..J.N"\ -~ Analyzed By: fY\ r 11. oQ...\ M.S,--i1JJ-W..V c,_ ~II---- Relinquished By: Received By: Relinquished By: Received By: All samples remained in the custody of TETCO unless otherwise indicated. r mmeats ~ V V Vl .s ,:: o2 0::: -0 ~ ~ .c. u -5 ~ o5 u ., u 0 ,:: 0 ~ VJ a) -0 u "T" u < 'A. er. V ,:: .... cc -2:! X cs:! V 3 ::r: i-"f: 391 E 620 S. A1rn:rican Fork. UT 84003 801-492-9 106 • 80 1-492-9107 Notes Date: °I/ z.o --z. t I -z. 3 Date: 'i(u:,-"l.l ( Z.. 'S Date: 'f{z.c;{ .. ~ Date: Date: D APPENDIX D Raw Production Data Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation Raw Production Data Facility: Stack Identification:  Estimated Velocity, fpm 60.75 Gencor Baghouse  Stack Inside Diameter, inches Estimated Moisture, percent 240 2,130 a: Distance upstream from next disturbance, feet b: Distance downstream from last disturbance, feet KilnType: Number of Ports Process Type: Control Unit 2 Estimated Temperature, oF 30g: Distance of Sample Level to ground, feet Staker and Parson Companies 25-30 Gencor Baghouse 64 132 a g b Figure 1. Facility Schematic Representation t i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \. II.IT 1 1/_c,. Rc-c-~~ I ~ 153 ' I r✓ ,t;Y!e_ / I I " 1 -'1/,.' 3/ /.55,~ 7.1 }/ (., ' c_;, / d k // I ' ---1-- 1-9 '(.0., / 3C:,4 :;,,_s-33 -2.9 l - 1 . CJ.:J's JLZ? 7,cl 32,5 -2~ 9 I -. 7 o/.'/f~ /3~8' 7,4., :g 2-,. 2 .q I , .. I If/-- 11 q:5~ /,¾,.~ ;.J,,"", -,;..., 3-='(8 -2.c; ,-,,,)s-...::P"T"T'tJ - 7 j(!),6'1 /\~5-7. 7 35°,7 -2 .c;, -.1 ( :J l,1c, :/7 1 ·.z:5."'.2. ?1 5-s2.3 -2 ... ct -o-I } ? -Y6'~ 1-39,2. 7✓ ~ 33 -2,9 I 0 /(a / I I I , I . I I lo ✓ . •·· - Facility )fefr,,,. / Pv/dr 1/k LocaUon J?v ,,£,,J ,t; " ·=-= C Date ------, ...... Q~',J-C,1,.......... ..... --,,J.__./,._1~2; ..... )_------------- Record values every 15 minutes '>, 47/,11/I-A't wt Pit {} J.,/ Run# Time .J-',I L ;.,/, fvJ. .(). p #~ (I '1{w(i.3 . . , -12.,~ /C).;.(_"'G:._ /J t'J 7~.~ 32 I • -. • I rt ..Y4M l ~ t,. ?.~ -.::5"~ ,--0? f --4 ///..52, ... /-3/:, ~ 7. ~ 3Z.. ..-• l? r G ,;'4 o, ~~ ~ 7 ~-2. I ,,., ~ '2 ~ AM I ' ' r -~ I z ;.55 I .\/. S-r-7.~ '3-y:? --.. I t:-( /~'CJ~ /,<itS';/ 7.~ , ~e-1. c, .d r -2;3q I -"" '5r' <-I ?r 9 s-r, 7 -, C,Lf (' -:R ·,.-~q, I~ c;" 'r. cc ~I, 7 --;. I? ( .-:J.:o_') I 3L:f, I ?. ? ·s ,-:s,1 --1 7 - I --3: 14 /A/1-f' /, 9 ,'f ss--.,, 1..::i-- -,?,2/ /39,9 ~-7:6 3/. .'J -,,2 r ,$ ·. 3. \ / 3 ~,? 7,q --so,c-( -• I [ }, .\· ~-I 3 ,& ?. 8" 3 1,3 -.. 2Lj I_:;; -i I.( ( 0 I ,1 7, S--/, s-S s, cs-)... . --o~C:... -1 7 A\~2\ / J ~-= 7 1,7 :j 71 ~ --2 2- ,- Notes: E APPENDIX E Calibration Procedures and Results Calibration of the console dry gas meter(s), pitot tubes, nozzles diameters, and temperature sensors were carried out in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance Handbook. The appropriate calibration data are presented in the following pages. The nozzle calibrations are recorded on the first page of the field data sheets. Figure 2. Schematic of Method 5/202 Sampling Train Meter Box Calibration Data and Calculations Forms Pre-test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Forms Post-test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data Forms Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration Balance Calibration Barometer Check and Calibration Form Method 9 Certification Figure 2. Schematic of Method 5/202 Sampling Train Temperature Se!1$0r t ~P~e Type S Pitot Tube Temperature Sensortl Gooseneck Nozzle l Heat Traced "--/ Probe "'------,_ Type S Pitot Tube Temperature Sensor Glass Filter Holder Stack Wall Manometer Orifice ....,.._._ ---~ ¢ J ' Manomet~r · g Temperature Sensors tf:-1 w I Dry Gas \ ! Meter l \_) Thermocouple CPM Filler // ~30° CIBS° FJ Temperature .....---Condenser ~ Sensor \\)/;~.nh , 1 1 . '-' u---\.1 ~~<,,':l!l'l,,\..; ;,i;.;~~ J I ., I I': i . ,~, ' , 1 1_ II , · · Bath , , I { Vacuum 1 1 i , Line 1 ~ l t i I '-J ~··; Recirculation "--f Pump Empty lmpingers 9 c.,.,.o r~~ I< Valve MPump Silica Gel lmpinger Date:1/5/23 Calibrator:Reference: Temperature Temperature Source Difference (Medium)(oF) Water 1 Water 1 Water 0 Water 1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -1 Water -1 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -2 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -1 Water 1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -2 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water -2 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water -1 202 33 33 Impinger Out K 33 33 204 203 33 34 Impinger Out J Impinger Out H Impinger Out I 33 202 33 203 33 204 33 204 204 204 33 G H Oven (3)33 33 204 204 Oven (4)33 204 Oven 33 33 204 204 Oven 33 33 33 204 204 Oven (3) A 205204 33 Oven (3)33 34 Oven (4) Thermocouple Location 204 205 Impinger Out F 33 33 203 204 204 204 204 204 204 33 33 Impinger Out G 204 204 Oven (3)32 204 204 33 32 204Oven (4) 204 Impinger Out D 33 34 204 203 Impinger Out E 33 34 204 204 202 33 33 204Impinger Out B Impinger Out C 33 33 204 204 203 Impinger Out A 33 34 204 Oven (3) Oven (4) TETCO Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration B C 204 203 33 32 33 33 204 33 34 Mike McNamara Omega CL3512A Unit ID Reference (oF) Sensor (oF) Temperature 33 D E Oven 33 33 204 204F Oven (4) ME T H O D 5 D R Y G A S M E T E R C A L I B R A T I O N U S I N G C R I T I C A L O R I F I C E S 1) Se l e c t t h r e e c r i t i c a l o r i f i c e s t o c a l i b r a t e t h e d r y g a s m e t e r w h i c h b r a c k e t t h e e x p e c t e d o p e r a t i n g r a n g e . 2) Re c o r d b a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e b e f o r e a n d a f t e r c a l i b r a t i o n p r o c e d u r e . 3) Ru n a t t e s t e d v a c u u m ( f r o m O r i f i c e C a l i b r a t i o n R e p o r t ) , f o r a p e r i o d o f t i m e ne c e s s a r y t o a c h i e v e a m i n i m u m t o t a l v o l u m e o f 5 c u b i c f e e t . 4) Re c o r d d a t a a n d i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e GR E E N c e l l s , Y E L L O W c e l l s a r e c a l c u l a t e d . TE C H N I C I A N : IN I T I A L FIN A L AV G ( P ba r ) DA T E : 12 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 2 ME T E R S E R I A L # : 30 0 3 1 5 BA R O M E T R I C P R E S S U R E ( i n H g ) : 25 . 6 5 25 . 6 5 25 . 6 5 IF Y V A R I A T I O N E X C E E D S 2 . 0 0 % , ME T E R P A R T # : Co n s o l e 3 CR I T I C A L O R I F I C E S E T S E R I A L # : 14 5 3 S EQ U I P M E N T I D # : OR I F I C E S H O U L D B E R E C A L I B R A T E D K' TE S T E D TE M P E R A T U R E S ° F EL A P S E D FA C T O R VA C U U M DG M R E A D I N G S ( F T 3) AM B I E N T DG M I N L E T DG M O U T L E T DG M TI M E ( M I N ) DG M DH (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) Y OR I F I C E # RU N # (A V G ) (i n H g ) IN I T I A L FI N A L NE T ( V m) IN I T I A L FIN A L IN I T I A L FIN A L AV G q (in H 2O) Vm ( S T D ) Vcr ( S T D ) Y VA R I A T I O N ( % ) DH@ 1 0. 8 1 3 7 10 58 . 3 8 1 63 . 4 1 4 5.0 3 3 71 78 81 75 76 77 . 5 4. 7 5 2. 9 0 4. 2 7 4 5 4.3 0 3 5 1.0 0 7 1. 6 8 8 2 0. 8 1 3 7 10 63 . 4 1 4 68 . 4 7 0 5.0 5 6 71 80 82 75 75 78 . 0 4. 7 5 2. 9 0 4. 2 9 0 0 4.3 0 3 5 1.0 0 3 1. 6 8 6 3 0. 8 1 3 7 10 68 . 4 7 0 73 . 5 3 6 5.0 6 6 71 81 83 75 76 78 . 8 4. 7 5 2. 9 0 4. 2 9 2 5 4.3 0 3 5 1.0 0 3 1. 6 8 4 AV G = 1.0 0 4 0. 0 9 1 0. 5 3 1 7 12 41 . 2 6 7 46 . 2 8 1 5.0 1 4 70 76 77 72 72 74 . 3 7. 2 5 1. 2 5 4. 2 6 4 1 4.2 9 6 2 1.0 0 8 1. 7 0 3 2 0. 5 3 1 7 12 46 . 2 8 1 53 . 0 2 8 6.7 4 7 70 77 79 72 74 75 . 5 9. 7 5 1. 2 5 5. 7 2 4 6 5.7 7 7 6 1.0 0 9 1. 6 9 9 3 0. 5 3 1 7 12 53 . 0 2 8 58 . 0 5 8 5.0 3 0 70 78 79 74 74 76 . 3 7. 2 5 1. 2 5 4. 2 6 1 8 4.2 9 6 2 1.0 0 8 1. 6 9 7 AV G = 1.0 0 8 0. 5 0 1 0. 3 3 0 7 13 73 . 6 4 2 78 . 6 6 0 5.0 1 8 73 79 78 76 76 77 . 3 11 . 5 0 0. 4 5 4. 2 3 4 0 4.2 2 6 5 0.9 9 8 1. 5 8 1 2 0. 3 3 0 7 13 78 . 6 6 0 83 . 6 8 3 5.0 2 3 73 78 78 76 76 77 . 0 11 . 5 0 0. 4 5 4. 2 4 0 2 4.2 2 6 5 0.9 9 7 1. 5 8 2 3 0. 3 3 0 7 13 83 . 6 8 3 88 . 7 1 0 5.0 2 7 73 79 78 78 76 77 . 8 11 . 5 0 0. 4 5 4. 2 3 7 6 4.2 2 6 5 0.9 9 7 1. 5 8 0 AV G = 0.9 9 7 -0 . 5 8 AV E R A G E D R Y G A S M E T E R C A L I B R A T I O N F A C T O R , Y = 1. 0 0 3 AV E R A G E DH@ = 1. 6 5 5 (1 ) = Ne t v o l u m e o f g a s s a m p l e p a s s e d t h r o u g h D G M , c o r r e c t e d t o s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s K1 = 17 . 6 4 oR/ i n . H g ( E n g l i s h ) , 0 . 3 8 5 8 oK/ m m H g ( M e t r i c ) Tm = Ab s o l u t e D G M a v g . t e m p e r a t u r e ( oR - E n g l i s h , o K - M e t r i c ) DH@ = 0. 7 5 q DH V m(s t d ) Vcr (s t d ) V m (2 ) = Vo l u m e o f g a s s a m p l e p a s s e d t h r o u g h t h e c r i t i c a l o r i f i c e , c o r r e c t e d t o s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s Tam b = Ab s o l u t e a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e ( oR - E n g l i s h , o K - M e t r i c ) Av e r a g e K ' f a c t o r f r o m C r i t i c a l O r i f i c e C a l i b r a t i o n RE F E R E N C E IN OU T (3 ) = DG M c a l i b r a t i o n f a c t o r 32 33 32 62 63 63 20 4 20 5 20 5 TE M P E R A T U R E S E N S O R S oF 20 2 3 P r e - C a l i b r a t i o n Co n s o l e # 3 30 19 12 R K i t c h e n EN V I R O N M E N T A L S U P P L Y C O M P A N Y US I N G T H E C R I T I C A L O R I F I C E S A S C A L I B R A T I O N S T A N D A R D S : Th e f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n s a r e u s e d t o c a l c u l a t e t h e s t a n d a r d v o l u m e s o f a i r p a s s e d t h r o u g h t h e D G M , V m(s t d ) , a n d t h e c r i t i c a l o r i f i c e , Vcr (s t d ) , a n d t h e D G M c a l i b r a t i o n f a c t o r , Y . T h e s e e q u a t i o n s a r e a u t o m a t i c a l l y c a l c u l a t e d i n t h e s p r e a d s h e e t a b o v e . ( )2 ( ) I I I I I I I I I -I 111111111111 D ~ I D [I] I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [II] [II] [II] .-------------1 [D [D [D □□□ ME T H O D 5 D R Y G A S M E T E R C A L I B R A T I O N U S I N G C R I T I C A L O R I F I C E S 1) Se l e c t t h r e e c r i t i c a l o r i f i c e s t o c a l i b r a t e t h e d r y g a s m e t e r w h i c h b r a c k e t t h e e x p e c t e d o p e r a t i n g r a n g e . 2) Re c o r d b a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e b e f o r e a n d a f t e r c a l i b r a t i o n p r o c e d u r e . 3) Ru n a t t e s t e d v a c u u m ( f r o m O r i f i c e C a l i b r a t i o n R e p o r t ) , f o r a p e r i o d o f t i m e ne c e s s a r y t o a c h i e v e a m i n i m u m t o t a l v o l u m e o f 5 c u b i c f e e t . 4) Re c o r d d a t a a n d i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e GR E E N c e l l s , Y E L L O W c e l l s a r e c a l c u l a t e d . TE C H N I C I A N : IN I T I A L FI N A L AV G ( P ba r ) DA T E : 09 / 2 2 / 2 3 ME T E R S E R I A L # : 30 0 3 1 5 BA R O M E T R I C P R E S S U R E ( i n H g ) : 25 . 4 0 25 . 4 0 25 . 4 0 IF Y V A R I A T I O N E X C E E D S 2 . 0 0 % , ME T E R P A R T # : Co n s o l e 3 CR I T I C A L O R I F I C E S E T S E R I A L # : 14 5 3 S EQ U I P M E N T I D # : OR I F I C E S H O U L D B E R E C A L I B R A T E D K' TE S T E D TE M P E R A T U R E S ° F EL A P S E D FA C T O R VA C U U M DG M R E A D I N G S ( F T 3) AM B I E N T DG M I N L E T DG M O U T L E T DG M TIM E ( M I N ) DG M DH (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) Y OR I F I C E # RU N # (A V G ) (i n H g ) IN I T I A L FI N A L NE T ( V m) IN I T I A L FIN A L IN I T I A L FIN A L AV G q (i n H 2O) Vm ( S T D ) Vcr ( S T D ) Y VA R I A T I O N ( % ) DH@ 1 0.5 3 1 7 12 96 . 4 6 1 10 2 . 4 4 2 5. 9 8 1 70 70 79 66 73 72 . 0 8. 2 5 1.3 5 5. 0 5 9 9 4.8 4 1 1 0. 9 5 7 1.8 6 6 2 0.5 3 1 7 12 10 2 . 4 4 2 10 8 . 0 9 4 5. 6 5 2 70 79 84 73 77 78 . 3 7. 7 5 1.3 5 4. 7 2 6 0 4.5 4 7 7 0. 9 6 2 1.8 4 4 3 0.5 3 1 7 12 10 8 . 0 9 4 11 4 . 6 9 3 6. 5 9 9 70 83 89 77 82 82 . 8 9. 0 0 1.3 5 5. 4 7 2 1 5.2 8 1 2 0. 9 6 5 1.8 2 9 AV G = 0. 9 6 1 -1 . 5 4 1 0.8 1 3 7 10 14 . 8 9 2 26 . 6 6 2 11 . 7 7 0 75 86 97 82 87 88 . 0 10 . 7 5 3.1 0 9. 7 1 5 2 9.6 0 8 5 0. 9 8 9 1.8 0 2 2 0.8 1 3 7 10 26 . 6 6 2 32 . 4 3 8 5. 7 7 6 75 96 99 87 89 92 . 8 5. 2 5 3.1 0 4. 7 2 6 7 4.6 9 2 5 0. 9 9 3 1.7 8 6 3 0.8 1 3 7 10 32 . 4 3 8 38 . 7 8 7 6. 3 4 9 75 98 10 1 89 91 94 . 8 5. 7 5 3.1 0 5. 1 7 6 8 5.1 3 9 4 0. 9 9 3 1.7 8 0 AV G = 0. 9 9 2 1. 5 4 1 2 3 AV G = AV E R A G E D R Y G A S M E T E R C A L I B R A T I O N F A C T O R , Y = 0. 9 7 6 AV E R A G E DH@ = 1. 8 1 8 (1 ) = Ne t v o l u m e o f g a s s a m p l e p a s s e d t h r o u g h D G M , c o r r e c t e d t o s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s K1 = 17 . 6 4 oR/ i n . H g ( E n g l i s h ) , 0 . 3 8 5 8 oK/m m H g ( M e t r i c ) Tm = Ab s o l u t e D G M a v g . t e m p e r a t u r e ( oR - E n g l i s h , o K - M e t r i c ) DH@ = 0. 7 5 q DH V m(s t d ) Vcr (s t d ) V m (2 ) = Vo l u m e o f g a s s a m p l e p a s s e d t h r o u g h t h e c r i t i c a l o r i f i c e , c o r r e c t e d t o s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s Tam b = Ab s o l u t e a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e ( oR - E n g l i s h , o K - M e t r i c ) K' = Av e r a g e K ' f a c t o r f r o m C r i t i c a l O r i f i c e C a l i b r a t i o n RE F E R E N C E IN OU T (3 ) = DG M c a l i b r a t i o n f a c t o r 30 TE M P E R A T U R E S E N S O R S oF Po s t C a l i b r a t i o n St a k e r s D u c h e n s e R K i t c h e n Co n s o l e # 3 19 EN V I R O N M E N T A L S U P P L Y C O M P A N Y US I N G T H E C R I T I C A L O R I F I C E S A S C A L I B R A T I O N S T A N D A R D S : Th e f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n s a r e u s e d t o c a l c u l a t e t h e s t a n d a r d v o l u m e s o f a i r p a s s e d t h r o u g h t h e D G M , V m (s t d ) , a n d t h e c r i t i c a l o r i f i c e , V cr (s t d ) , a n d t h e D G M c a l i b r a t i o n f a c t o r , Y . T h e s e e q u a t i o n s a r e a u t o m a t i c a l l y c a l c u l a t e d i n t h e s p r e a d s h e e t a b o v e . ( )2 ( ) I I I I I I -I I I I I I I I I I □~ I I I I I I I I I I I I [II] [II] [II] D [II] [II] [II] [I] (q' ,,, -~ .:: ~,-. □□□ Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Date:Pitot Tube Identification: Technician: Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ? Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ? PA = 0.474 PB =0.474 a1 < 10o a1 = o a2 < 10o a2 = o b1 < 5o b1 = o b2 < 5o b2 = o Z  0.125 in.Z = in. W W  0.03125 in.W = in. W > 3 inches W = in. Z > 3/4 inch Z = in. Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in. The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes Reference: TemperatureSource Reference Sensor (Medium)(oF)(oF) Probe AIR 71 71 AIR 70 71 ICE WATER 33 34 BOIL WATER 204 205 SILICONE OIL Heat Check 248 Temperature Sensor Calibration 1 1 1Stack Omega CL3512A Probe Yes Yes Continuity Check Temperature TemperatureDifference (oF) 0 in. in. Yes Yes 0.002 4.75 1 3 1/4 1/3/2023 60 G-2 M. McNamara in. 0.012 1 0 1 0 b2 b1 B A w Dt PA PB I -~..,. .. -_: I ~-~ +--.--·-- Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Date:Pitot Tube Identification: Technician: Dt=0.375 Is PA = PB ? Is 1.05 • Dt  PA & PB  1.50 • Dt ? PA = 0.454 PB =0.454 a1 < 10o a1 = o a2 < 10o a2 = o b1 < 5o b1 = o b2 < 5o b2 = o Z  0.125 in.Z = in. W W  0.03125 in.W = in. W > 3 inches W = in. Z > 3/4 inch Z = in. Y ≥ 3 inches Y = in. The pitot tube meets the specifications for a calibration factor of 0.84?Yes Reference: TemperatureSource Reference Sensor (Medium)(oF)(oF) Probe AIR 69 70 AIR 70 70 ICE WATER 33 33 BOIL WATER 204 204 SILICONE OIL Heat Check 248 Temperature Sensor Calibration 0 0 0Stack Omega CL3512A Probe Yes Yes Continuity Check Temperature TemperatureDifference (oF) 1 in. in. Yes Yes 0.002 5 1.5 3 3/4 1/3/2023 60 G-1 M. McNamara in. 0.012 1 1 2 2 b2 b1 B A w Dt PA PB I -~..,. .. -_: I ~-~ +--.--·-- Date:1/5/23 Calibrator:Reference: Temperature Temperature Source Difference (Medium)(oF) Water 1 Water 1 Water 0 Water 1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -1 Water -1 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -2 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -1 Water 1 Water 0 Water 0 Water 0 Water 1 Water -2 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water -2 Water 0 Water -1 Water 0 Water -1 202 33 33 Impinger Out K 33 33 204 203 33 34 Impinger Out J Impinger Out H Impinger Out I 33 202 33 203 33 204 33 204 204 204 33 G H Oven (3)33 33 204 204 Oven (4)33 204 Oven 33 33 204 204 Oven 33 33 33 204 204 Oven (3) A 205204 33 Oven (3)33 34 Oven (4) Thermocouple Location 204 205 Impinger Out F 33 33 203 204 204 204 204 204 204 33 33 Impinger Out G 204 204 Oven (3)32 204 204 33 32 204Oven (4) 204 Impinger Out D 33 34 204 203 Impinger Out E 33 34 204 204 202 33 33 204Impinger Out B Impinger Out C 33 33 204 204 203 Impinger Out A 33 34 204 Oven (3) Oven (4) TETCO Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration B C 204 203 33 32 33 33 204 33 34 Mike McNamara Omega CL3512A Unit ID Reference (oF) Sensor (oF) Temperature 33 D E Oven 33 33 204 204F Oven (4) Balance Denver Instruments, Model A-250, SN B045284 Weights Used Denver Instruments Weight Set, SN 98-115146 Certified Weight Measured Weight Difference grams grams grams 0.1000 0.1000 0.0000 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 10.0000 10.0000 0.0000 50.0000 50.0000 0.0000 100.0000 100.0000 0.0000 120.0000 120.0000 0.0000 150.0000 149.9999 0.0001 Technician Michael McNamara TETCO Annual Balance Calibration Check Date 1/03/23 000608 Environmental Services Awards this Certificate to JOSEPH WELLS For successfully completing the Federal EPA Method 9 Vis.ible Em.issions Evaluation Course and having met the requirements necessary to evaluate visible emissions. dkJ~ ·. SOUTHJORDAN,UT Mar 11, 2024 Manager Locarion Valid Timi F APPENDIX F Protocol and Related Correspondence To: MEMORANDUM DAQC-528-21 Site ID 13267 (B4) STACK TEST FILE -R. CHAPMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. - PORTABLE AGGREGATE EQUIPMENT-LOA, WAYNE COUNTY, UTAH Through: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Compliance Section Manager (i2} From: Date: Subject: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist ~ April 23 , 2021 Source: Location: Contact: Tester: Site ID#: Permit/AO #: Subject: Hot Mix Asphalt Equipment and Baghouse Loa, Wayne County, Utah Steven MacKay: 801-631-3849 Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC 13267 Approval Order DAQE-AN132670009-21 dated April 7, 2021 Review of Pretest Protocol dated April 19, 2021 On April 23, 202 I , DAQ received a protocol for testing of Hot Mix Asphalt equipment and Baghouse for R. Chapman Construction Company in Loa, Utah. Testing will be performed on May 4, 2021 , to determine compliance with the emission limits found in conditions 11.B.9 in Approval Order DAQE-AN132670009- 21 dated April 7, 2021 . PROTOCOL CONDITIONS: 1. RM l used to determine sample velocity traverses; OK 2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate; OK 3. RM 3 used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream; OK 4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content; OK 5. RM 5 used to determine particulate matter emissions; OK 6. RM 9 used to determine visible emissions opacity; OK 7. RM 202 used to determine condensable particulate matter; OK DEVIATIONS: None. CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: The methods proposed in the pretest protocol are sufficient to determine particulate matter emissions from the Hot Mix Asphalt equipment and Baghouse. It is recommended that the pretest protocol be determined as acceptable. DAQC-2021-005730 ATTACHMENTS : R. Chapman Construction Company's Test Notification Letter and Pretest Protocol MONTROSE A IR Qll I\ l T \" \ f RV I<· 1-, April 19, 2021 Subject: Compllance/Subpart I Test Plan, Drum Mix Asphalt Plant R. Chapman Construction Company, Portable HMA Plant Loa, Utah Approval Order No.: DAQE-AN132670009-21; Montrose Document Number GP081AS-007581-PP-349 Enclosed please find the compliance test plan for the above-referenced facility and source. The test plan documents the details of the testing that will be performed by Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) at R. Chapman Construction Company's Portable Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Plant on May 4, 2021. The following distribution was provided for this project. Name Steven MacKay RikOmbach Company/Agency R. Chapman Construction Company 140 W 425 S 330-16 Roosevelt, Utah 84066 UOEQ 195 N 1950 W Salt Lake City, UT 84116 No. of Copies X X Elactronlc Copy Emailed PDF, 4/19/2021 Emailed PDF, 4/19/2021 Please do not hesitate to call our Spanish Fork office at 801~794-2950 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Beckie Hawkins Office Manager Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC Montrose Spanish Fork Office 6823S 3600W Spanish Fork, UT 84660 T: 901. 794.2950 www.montrose-env.com Global Headquarters 1 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Irvine, CA 92614 T: 949.988.3500 SOURCE TEST PLAN 2021 COMPLIANCE/SUBPART I TESTING R. CHAPMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DRUM MIX ASPHALT PLANT LOA, UTAH Prepared For: R. Chapman Construction Company 140 West 425 South 330-16 Roosevelt, Utah 84066 For Submittal To: State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Prepared By: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, UT 84660 Document Number: Proposed Test Date: Submittal Date: GP081 AS-007581-PP-349 May 4, 2021 April 19, 2021 R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in this document is complete and accurate and confonns to the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04. Signature: ~-\i, ~ Date: __ '1_j ..... ,q,........,_/Oo=.,.~,.____;__----- Name: -----------Beckie Hawkins Title: _____ Offi_1ce_M_an_a_.9.._e_r ____ _ I have reviewed, technically and editorially, details and other appropriate written materials contained herein. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the presented material is authentic and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality Management System and ASTM D7036-04. Name: ___ C_h_e....,._y_n~eyL.._G_u,,_ym_on __ _ Title: ____ F_ie_ld_P_ro,.je_c_t_M_a_n_.;ag.._e_r ___ _ ~\ MONTROSE WI "'····· "··" R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM .............................................................................. 5 1.2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND EMISSION LIMITS ............................................. 6 1.3 KEY PERSONNEL ...................................................................................................... 7 2.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS ....................................................... 9 2.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION, OPERATION, AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT ................. 9 2.2 FLUE GAS SAMPLING LOCATION ............................................................................ 9 2.3 OPERATING CONDITIONS AND PROCESS DATA .................................................. 9 2.4 PLANT SAFETY ....................................................................................................... 10 2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities .................................................................................... 1 O 2.4.2 Safety Program and Requirements ................................................................. 11 3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ............................................................... 12 3.1 TEST METHODS ...................................................................................................... 12 3.1.1 EPA Method 1 ................................................................................................ 12 3.1.2 EPA Method 2 ................................................................................................ 12 3.1.3 EPA Method 3 ................................................................................................ 13 3.1.4 EPA Method 4 ................................................................................................ 14 3.1.5 EPA Methods 5 and 202 ................................................................................. 15 3.1.6 EPA Method 9 ................................................................................................ 16 3.2 PROCESS TEST METHODS .................................................................................... 17 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REPORTING ...................................................................... 18 4.1 QA AUDITS .............................................................................................................. 18 4.2 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES ...................................................................... 18 4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance ......................................................... 18 4.2.2 Audit Samples ................................................................................................ 18 4.3 DATA ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION ....................................................................... 18 4.4 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND CUSTODY ........................................................... 19 4.5 QUALITY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 19 4.6 REPORTING ............................................................................................................. 19 4.6.1 Example Report Format. ................................................................................. 20 4.6.2 Example Presentation of Test Results ............................................................ 20 R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan LIST OF APPENDICES A SUPPORTING INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 22 A.1 Units and Abbreviations ................... _ ......................................................................... 23 A.2 Accreditation Information/Certifications ..................................................................... 24 A.3 Stack Schematics ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. •s~ Fl ELD WORK SAFETY PLAN ............................................... Error I Bookmark not defined. LIST OF TABLES 1-1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM AND PROPOSED SCHEDULE ..................................... 5 1-2 REPORTING UNITS AND EMISSION LIMITS .................................................................... 6 1-3 TEST PERSONNEL AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................. 8 2-1 SAMPLING LOCATION ...................................................................................................... 9 4-1 TYPICAL REPORT FORMAT ........................................................................................... 20 4-2 EXAMPLE PM EMISSIONS RESULTS-300 TPH HMA PLANT ...................................... 21 LIST OF FIGURES 3-1 US EPA METHOD 3 (FYRITEANALYZER) SAMPLING TRAIN ....................................... 14 3-2 US EPA METHOD 5/202 SAMPLING TRAIN ................................................................... 16 R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM R. Chapman Construction Company (R. Chapman) contracted Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) to perform a compliance emissions test program on the Portable Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Plant located in Loa, Utah. The tests are conducted to compliance with Approval Order (AO) number DAQE-AN132670009-21 issued by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UTAH) and with Subpart I of 40 CFR 60. The specific objectives are to: • Measure emissions of FPM and PM10 from the outlet of the HMA bag house exhaust stack • Observe visible emission opacity from the HMA baghouse exhaust stack and silo bin vent exhaust points • Measure stack flow rate, 02, CO2, and moisture content • Conduct the test program with a focus on safety Montrose will provide the test personnel and the necessary equipment to measure emissions as outlined in this test plan. Facility personnel will provide the process and production data to be included in the final report. A summary of the test program and proposed schedule is presented in Table 1-1 , TABLE 1-1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM AND PROPOSED SCHEDULE Proposed Unit ID/ Activity/ Test No.of Duration Test Date(s) Source Name Parameters Methods Runs (Minutes) 5/4/2021 HMA Baghouse VelocityNol u metric EPA 1 &2 3 -10 Exhaust Stack Flow Rate .,, 1111 02, CO2 EPA3 3 60 "" "" Moisture EPA4 3 60 "" 1111 FPM, PM10 EPA 5/202 (1> 3 60 nr !Iii Opacity EPA9 3 6 <1l If the EPA Method 5/202 results are about the PM10 standard, Montrose would like the option of running EPA Method 201A to meet the standard. To simplify this test plan, a list of Units and Abbreviations is included in Appendix A. Throughout this test plan, chemical nomenclature, acronyms, and reporting units are not defined. Please refer to the list for specific details. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 1.2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND EMISSION LIMITS The results from this test program are presented in units consistent with those listed in the applicable regulations or requirements. The reporting units and emission limits are presented in Table 1-2. Unit ID/ Source Name HMA Baghouse Exhaust Stack .. .. "" .. HMA Baghouse Exhaust Stack & Silo Bin Vent Exhaust TABLE 1-2 REPORTING UNITS AND EMISSION LIMITS Parameter Volumetric flow rate 02 &CO2 Moisture FPM PM10 Visible Emissions Reporting Units acfm, scfm, dscfm %vd % gr/dscf gr/dscf % Emission Limit 0.030 0.024 10 Emission Limit Reference 11.B.9.g 11.B.9.g 11.B.9.f R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 1.3 KEY PERSONNEL A list of project participants is included below: Facility Information Source Location: R. Chapman Construction Company Drum Mix Asphalt Plant Roosevelt, Utah Project Contact Andy Potter Role: Plant Manager Company: R. Chapman Construction Company Telephone: 435-503-4128 Email: andy@chapman.us Agency Information Regulatory Agency: Utah Dept. of Environmental Quality Agency Contact: Todd Wetzel Telephone: 801-536-4429 Email: twetzel@utah.gov Testing Company Information Testing Firm: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose) Contact: Beckie Hawkins Cheyney Guymon Title: Office Manager Field Project Manager Telephone: 801-794-2950 801 -794-2950 Email: behawkins@montrose-env.com chguymon@montrose-env.com Laboratory Information Laboratory: Montrose City, State: Spanish Fork, Utah Method: 5, 202 ,&'j\MONTROSE R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan Table 1-3 details the roles and responsibilities of the test team. TABLE 1-3 TEST PERSONNEL AND RESPONSIBILITIES Role Client Project Manager Fleld Project Manager Field Technician Primary Assignment Coordinate Project Operate mobile lab Execute stack platform responsibilities Add ltlonal Responsibilities Post-test follow-up Facility Interface, test crew coordination Preparation, support PM R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 2.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 2.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION, OPERATION, AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT Asphaltic concrete paving is a mixture of well graded, high quality aggregate and liquid asphaltic cement which is heated and mixed in measured quantities to produce bituminous pavement material. Aggregate constitutes 92 weight percent of the total mixture. Aside from the amount and grade of asphalt used, mix characteristics are determined by the relative amounts and types of aggregate used. A certain percentage of fine aggregate (% less than 7 4 micrometers in physical diameter) is required for the production of good quality asphaltic concrete. The drum mix process simplifies the conventional process by using proportioning feed controls in place of hot aggregate storage bins, vibrating screens, and the mixer. Aggregate is introduced near the burner end of the revolving drum mixer, and the asphalt oil is mixed in a pug mill after the hot aggregate is discharged from the drum. A variable flow asphalt pump is linked electronically to the aggregate belt scales to control mix specifications. The hot mix is discharged from the pug mill into surge bins or storage bins. 2.2 FLUE GAS SAMPLING LOCATION Actual stack measurements, number of traverse points, and location of traverse points will be evaluated in the field as part of the test program. Table 2-1 presents the anticipated stack measurements and traverse points for the sampling locations listed. Sampling Location HMA Bahouse Exhaust Stack TABLE 2-1 SAMPLING LOCATION Stack Inside Distance from Nearest Disturbance Diameter Downstream Upstream (In.) EPA "B" (inJdla.) EPA "A" (in./dla.) 60x60 (De= 60} 160 / 2.7 30 / 0.50 Number of Traverse Points lsokinetic: 25 (5/port); Gaseous: 1 Sample locations are verified in the field to conform to EPA Method 1. Acceptable cyclonic flow conditions are confirmed prior to testing using EPA Method 1, Section 11.4. Appendix A presents stack schematics and process flow diagrams. 2.3 OPERATING CONDITIONS AND PROCESS DATA Emission tests will be performed while the source/units and air pollution control devices are operating at the conditions required by the permit. The unit will be tested when operating at no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the previous three (3) years. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan Plant .personnel are responsible for establishing the test conditions and collecting all applicable unit-operating data. Data collected includes the following parameters: • Production rate, TPH • Differential pressure, inches of H2O 2.4 PLANT SAFETY Montrose will comply with all safety requirements at the facility. The facility Client Sponsor, or designated point of contact, is responsible for ensuring routine compliance with plant entry, health, and safety requirements. The Client Sponsor has the authority to impose or waive facility restrictions. The Montrose test team leader has the authority to negotiate any deviations from the facility restrictions with the Client Sponsor. Any deviations must be documented. 2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities Planning • Montrose must complete a field review with the Client Sponsor prior to the project date. The purpose of the review is to develop a scope of work that identifies the conditions, equipment, methods, and physical locations that will be utilized along with any policies or procedures that will affect our work. • We must reach an agreement on the proper use of client emergency services and ensure that proper response personnel are available, as needed. • The potential for chemical exposure and actions to be taken in case of exposure must be communicated to Montrose. This information must include expected concentrations of the chemicals and the equipment used to identify the substances. • Montrose will provide a list of equipment being brought to the site, if required by the client. Project Day • Montrose personnel will arrive with the appropriate training and credentials for the activities they will be performing and the equipment that they will operate. • Our team will meet daily to review the Project Scope, Job Hazard Assessment, and Work Permits. The Client Sponsor and Operations Team are invited to participate. • Montrose will provide equipment that can interface with the client utilities previously identified in the planning phase and only work with equipment that our client has made ready and prepared for connection. • We will follow client direction regarding driving safety, safe work permitting, staging of equipment, and other crafts or work in the area. • As per 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart A, Section 60.8, the facility must provide the following provisions at each sample location: o Sampling ports, which meet EPA minimum requirements for testing. The caps should be removed or be hand-tight. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan o Safe sampling platforms. o Safe access to the platforms and test ports, including any scaffolding or man lifts. o Sufficient utilities to perform all necessary testing. • Montrose will use the client communication system, as directed, in case of plant or project emergency. • Any adverse conditions, unplanned shutdowns or other deviations to the agreed scope and project plan must be reviewed with the Client Sponsor prior to continuing work. This will include any safe work permit and hazard assessment updates. Completion • Montrose personnel will report any process concerns, incidents or near misses to the Client Sponsor prior to leaving the site. • Montrose will clean up our work area to the same condition as it was prior to our arrival. • We will ensure that all utilities, connection points or equipment have been returned to the pre-project condition or as stated in the safe work permit. In addition, we will walk out the job completion with Operations and the Client Sponsor if required by the facility. 2.4.2 Safety Program and Requirements Montrose has a comprehensive health and safety program that satisfies State and Federal OSHA requirements. The program includes an Illness and Injury Prevention Program, site-specific safety meetings, and training in safety awareness and procedures. The basic elements include: • All regulatory required policies/procedures and training for OSHA, EPA and FMCSA • Medical monitoring, as necessary • Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and chemical detection equipment • Hazard communication • Pre-test and daily toolbox meetings • Continued evaluation of work and potential hazards. • Near-miss and incident reporting procedures as required by Montrose and the Client Montrose will provide standard PPE to employees. The PPE will include but is not limited to; hard hats, safety shoes, glasses with side shields or goggles, hearing protection, hand protections, and fall protection. The detailed Site Safety Plan for this project is attached to this test plan in Appendix "S". R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 3.1 TEST METHODS The test methods for this test program were presented previously in Table 1-1. Additional information regarding specific applications or modifications to standard procedures is presented below. 3.1.1 EPA Method 1, Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources EPA Method 1 is used to assure that representative measurements of volumetric flow rate are obtained by dividing the cross-section of the stack or duct into equal areas, and then locating a traverse point within each of the equal areas. Acceptable sample locations must be located at least two stack or duct equivalent diameters downstream from a flow disturbance and one-half equivalent diameter upstream from a flow disturbance. 3.1.2 EPA Method 2, Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pitot Tube) EPA Method 2 is used to measure the gas velocity using an S-type pitot tube connected to a pressure measurement device, and to measure the gas temperature using a calibrated thermocouple connected to a thermocouple indicator. Typically, Type S {Stausscheibe) pitot tubes conforming to the geometric specifications in the test method are used, along with an inclined manometer. The measurements are made at traverse points specified by EPA Method 1. The molecular weight of the gas stream is determined from independent measurements of 02, CO2, and moisture. The stack gas volumetric flow rate is calculated using the measured average velocity head, the area of the duct at the measurement plane, the measured average temperature, the measured duct static pressure, the molecular weight of the gas stream, and the measured moisture. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below: • Method Options: o S-type pilot tube coefficient is 0.84 o Inclined manometer is used to measure velocity • Method Exceptions: o NA The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-2. ,&Yi, MONTROSE R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 3.1.3 EPA Method 3, Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight EPA Method 3 is used to calculate the dry molecular weight of the stack gas using one of three methods. The first choice is to measure the percent 02 and CO2 in the gas stream. A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one of the following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is analyzed for percent CO2 and percent 02 using either an Orsat or a Fyrite analyzer. The second choice is to use stoichiometric calculations to calculate dry molecular weight. The third choice is to use an assigned value of 30.0, in lieu of actual measurements, for processes burning natural gas, coal, or oil. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below: • Method Options: o A Fyrite-type combustion gas analyzer will be used to measure the analyte concentrations o Single-point integrated sampling will be performed • Method Exceptions: o NA • Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-1. ~MONTROSE R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan FIGURE 3-1 US EPA METHOD 3 (FYRITE ANAL VZER) SAMPLING TRAIN PROBE r FILTER (GLASS WOOL) l l FLEXIBLE TUBING SQUEEZE BULB i \ II 0. co. FYRITEANAI.VZER FYRITEANALVZER 3.1.4 EPA Method 4, Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas EPA Method 4 is a manual, non-isokinetic method used to measure the moisture content of gas streams. Gas is sampled at a constant sampling rate through a probe and impinger train. Moisture is removed using a series of pre-weighed impingers containing methodology-specific liquids and silica gel immersed in an ice water bath. The impingers are weighed after each run to determine the percent moisture. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below: • Method Options: o Condensed water is measured gravimetrically o Moisture sampling is performed as part of the particulate matter sample trains • Method Exceptions: o Moisture sampling is performed as a stand-alone method at a single point in the centroid of the stack • Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes • Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Volume: 21 scf The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-2. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 3.1.5 EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources and Dry lmpinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources EPA Methods 5 and 202 are manual, isokinetic methods used to measure FPM and CPM emissions. The methods are performed in conjunction with EPA Methods 1 through 4. The stack gas is sampled through a nozzle, probe, heated filter, unheated CPM filter, condenser, and impinger train. FPM is collected from the probe and heater filter. CPM is collected from the unheated CPM filter and the impinger train. The samples are analyzed gravimetrically. The sum of FPM and CPM represents TPM. The FPM, CPM, and TPM results are reported in emission concentration and emission rate units. Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below: • Method Options: o Glass sample nozzles and probe liners are used o Condensed water is measured gravimetrically o The post-test nitrogen purge is performed by passing nitrogen through the train under pressure o Sampling will be conducted at greater than 0.531 cfm • Method Exceptions: o None • Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes • Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Volume: 31.8 dscf • Analytical Laboratory: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC -Spanish Fork, UT The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-2. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan FIGURE 3-2 US EPA METHOD 5/202 SAMPLING TRAIN T'lff:'S' f'l10r MOIIICJIETER-· 1l-B'MJCD.R.ES 100ntl-1,0 (rn:dlclln>lp) .:a»:D:g Bl'-ff'SS '\#'t..',,E SlkaG!!l (m:dffed/n:,tfR ,,,__ VJIIO.J..M Gll.G:: 3.1.6 EPA Method 9, Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions VPO..LM LJr,E AOl'PTCR <I--VACU.M Ul'E EPA Method 9 is used to observe the visual opacity of emissions (opacity). The observer stands at a distance sufficient to provide a clear view of the emissions with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to their back. The line of vision is perpendicular to the plume direction and does not include more than one plume diameter. Observations are recorded at 15-second intervals and are made to the nearest 5% opacity. The qualified observer is certified according to the requirements of EPA Method 9, section 3.1. • Method Options: o Opacity readings will be conducted every 15 seconds for six (6) minutes on the stack concurrently with each of the EPA Method 5/202 compliance runs • Method Exceptions: o NA R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 3.2 PROCESS TEST METHODS The applicable regulations do not require process samples to be collected during this test program. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REPORTING 4.1 QA AUDITS Montrose has instituted a rigorous QNQC program for its air quality testing. Quality assurance audits are performed as part of the test program to ensure that the results are calculated using the highest quality data available. This program ensures that1he emissions data we report are as accurate as possible. The procedures included in the cited reference methods are followed during preparation, sampling, calibration, and analysis. Montrose is responsible for preparation, calibration, and cleaning of the sampling apparatus. Montrose will also perform the sampling, sample recovery, storage, and shipping. Approved contract laboratories may perform some of the preparation and sample analyses, as needed. 4.2 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES Montrose calibrates and maintains equipment as required by the methods performed and applicable regulatory guidance. Montrose follows internal procedures to prevent the use of malfunctioning or inoperable equipment in test programs. All equipment is operated by trained personnel. Any incidence of nonconforming work encountered during testing is reported and addressed through the corrective action system. 4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance Each piece of field equipment that requires calibration is assigned a unique identification number to allow tracking of its calibration history. All field equipment is visually inspected prior to testing and includes pre-test calibration checks as required by the test method or regulatory agency. 4.2.2 Audit Samples When required by the test method and available, Montrose obtains EPA TNI SSAS audit samples from an accredited provider for analysis along with the samples. Currently, the SSAS program has been suspended pending the availability of a second accredited audit sample provider. If the program is reinstated, the audit samples will be ordered. If required as part of the test program, the audit samples are stored, shipped, and analyzed along with the emissions samples collected during the test program. The audit sample results are reported along with the emissions sample results. 4.3 DATA ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION Montrose converts the raw field, laboratory, and process data to reporting units consistent with the permit or subpart. Calculations are made using proprietary computer spreadsheets or data acquisition systems. One run of each test method is also verified using a separate example calculation. The example calculations are checked against the spreadsheet results and are included in the final report. The "Standard ConditionsD for this project are 29.92 inches of mercury and 68 °F. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 4.4 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AND CUSTODY The on-site Field Project Manager will assume or assign the role of sample and data custodian until relinquishing custody. The sample custodian will follow proper custody procedures before departing from the test site including: • Assign the unique sample identification number to each sample • Attach sample labels and integrity seals to all samples • Complete COC form(s), ensuring that the sample identification numbers on the samples match the sample identification numbers on the COC • Pack and store samples in accordance with the test method requirements in appropriate transport containers for protection from breakage, contamination, or loss • Keep samples in a secure locked area if not in the direct presence of Montrose staff The sample custodian will follow proper custody procedures upon arriving at the Montrose office including: • Remove samples and COC documents from vehicles and check into designated secure sample holding areas • Store samples requiring additional measures such as refrigeration or dry ice appropriately 4.5 QUALITY STATEMENT Montrose is qualified to conduct this test program and has established a quality management system that led to accreditation with ASTM Standard D7036-04 (Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies). Montrose participates in annual functional assessments for conformance with D7036-04 which are conducted by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). All testing performed by Montrose is supervised on site by at least one Qualified Individual (QI) as defined in D7036-04 Section 8.3.2. Data quality objectives for estimating measurement uncertainty within the documented limits in the test methods are met by using approved test protocols for each project as defined in D7036-04 Sections 7 .2. 1 and 12.10. Additional quality assurance information is included in the appendices. The content of this test plan is modeled after the EPA Emission Measurement Center Guideline Document (GD-042). 4.6 REPORTING Montrose will prepare a final report to present the test data, calculations/equations, descriptions, and results. Prior to release by Montrose, each report is reviewed and certified by the project manager and their supervisor, or a peer. Source test reports will be submitted to the facility or appropriate regulatory agency (upon customer approval) within 30 days of the completion of the field work. The report will include a series of appendices to present copies of the intermediate calculations and example calculations, raw field data, laboratory analysis data, process data, and equipment calibration data. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan 4.6.1 Example Report Format The report is divided into various sections describing the different aspects of the source testing program. Table 4-1 presents a typical Table of Contents for the final report. Cover Page Certification of Report Table of Contents Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION TABLE 4-1 TYPICAL REPORT FORMAT 2.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4.0 TEST DISCUSSION AND RESULTS 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES Appendices A FIELD DATA AND CALCULATIONS B FACILITY PROCESS DATA C LABORATORY ANALYSIS DATA D QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL E REGULATORY INFORMATION 4.6.2 Example Presentation of Test Results Table 4-2 presents the typical tabular format that is used to summarize the results in the final source test report. Separate tables will outline the results for each target analyte and compare them to their respective emissions limits. R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan TABLE4-2 EXAMPLE PM EMISSIONS RESULTS - 300 TPH HMA PLANT Run Number 1 2 3 Average Date X X X Time X X X Process Data Production rate, TPH X X X X Differential pressure, inches of X X X X H20 Sampling & Flue Gas Parameters sample duration, minutes X X X sample volume, dscf X X X X isokinetic rate, % X X X 02, % volume dry X X X X CO2, % volume dry X X X X flue gas temperature, °F X X X X moisture content, % volume X X X X volumetric flow rate, dscfm X X X X · Filterable Particulate Matter (PM) gr/dscf X X X X PM10 gr/dscf X X X X lb/hr X X X X 4Vi\MONTRO~E R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan APPENDIX A SUPPORTING INFORMATION i\/i\ MONTROSE R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan Appendix A.1 Approval Order $Ii\ MONTROSE State of Utah SPENCER J. COX GoVI/Tlfor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lie11tenant Governor April 7, 2021 Steven MacKay Department of Environmental Quality Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Bryce C. Bird Director R. Chapman Construction, Inc. 244 West Highway 40, STE 333-4 Roosevelt, UT 84066 Steven@rchapman.us Dear Mr. MacKay: Re: Approval Order: DAQE-ANl 32670009-2 l Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN132670006-14, dated April 25, 2014, to Construct and Operate a Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Project Number: NI 32670009 The attached Approval Order (AO) is issued pursuant to the Notice of Intent (NOI) received on December 2, 2020. R Chapman Construction, Inc. must comply with the requirements of this AO, all applicable state requirements (R307), and Federal Standards. The project engineer for this action is Jake Ries, who can be contacted at (385) 306-6530 or jries@utah.gov. Future correspondence on this AO should include the engineer's name as well as the DAQE number shown on the upper right-hand comet of this letter. No public comments were received on this action. Sincerely, Bryce C. Bird Director BCB:JR:sb cc: Salt Lake Valley Health Department 195 North 1950 West• Salt Leke City, lIT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, lIT 114114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801} 536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 www.deq.utah.gov Printed Ol1 I 00% recycled paper STATE OF UTAH Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality APPROVAL ORDER DAQE-AN132670009-21 Modification to Approval Order DAQE-AN132670006-14, dated April 25, 2014, to Construct and Operate a Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Prepared By Jake Ries, Engineer (385) 306-6530 j ries@utah.gov Issued to R. Chapman Construction, Inc. -Portable Aggregate Equipment Issued On April 7, 2021 Issued By Bryce C. Bird Director Division of Air Quality TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE/SIGNATURE PAGE ......•..••....................••.•.•••••••••••••••....••.•••..•.•••••.••.•.•...••••.•.•••••••••.••.•.• 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION ............................................................................... 3 SOURCE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 3 General Description ................................................................................................................ 3 NSR Classification .................................................................................................................. 3 Source Classification .............................................................................................................. 3 Applicable Federal Standards ................................................................................................. 4 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 4 SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS •••••......•...........••••.....•••••••..••••••••••••...•.•.•..••••....•.•.•........ 4 SECTION ll: PERMITTED EQ'UIPMENT .............................................................................. 5 SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS •.•••.....•..•.•..........•.••.•..•••...•••••.•.••••.•....•••••..••••.•••...••.•••..• 6 PERMIT filSTORY •..•.••••.••..•••.....••.••..•.•.•.............•.........•••.••••••••...........••••.•......................•••••.. 13 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................... 14 DAQE-ANI 32670009-21 . Page 3 GENERAL INFORMATION CONTACT/LOCATION INFORMATION Owner Name R. Chapman Construction, Inc. Mailing Address 244 West Highway 40, STE 333-4 Roosevelt, UT 84066 Source Contact Name Steven MacKay Phone (801) 631-3849 Email Steven@rchapman.us SIC code 1442 {Construction Sand & Gravel) Source Name R. Chapman Construction, Inc. -Portable Aggregate Equipment Physical Address Various locations throughout the state which are not permanently based at any one site. Portable Source, UT SOURCE INFORMATION General Description R. Chapman Construction has requested an AO for a portable source. This AO is issued to R. Chapman Construction for the purpose of operating a portable source that belongs to the nonmetallic mineral processing industry, including aggregate, concrete, and hot mix asphalt plants. The plants subject to this AO shall be temporarily operated for a period of not more than 180 working days at any location. A relocation shall not exceed 365 consecutive days at any location in the State of Utah. Prior to commencement of operation at a location, the owner/operator shall submit a Notice of Temporary Relocation to the Director and obtain a Temporary Relocation Approval Letter. If the owner/operator operates at a location in compliance with the AO, the Notice of Temporary Relocation, and the Temporary Relocation Approval Letter, dispersion modeling results have determined that there will be no adverse impacts on air quality at the nearest residence or commercial establishment. Compliance with the opacity limits and operating practices contained in the conditions of the AO shall be considered as application ofBACT. The emission control measures required in the conditions of this AO shall apply to all of the locations at whicli the source approved by this AO operates. The source may be required to adopt additional measures for controlling emissions to address location-specific concerns. NSR Classification Minor Modification at Minor Source Source Classification Located in Portable Source County Airs Source Size: SM DAQE•AN l 32670009-2 l Page4 Aru>licable Federal Standards NSPS (Part 60), A: General Provisions NSPS (Part 60), I: Standards of Performance for Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities NSPS (Part 60), 000: Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants NSPS (Part 60), fill: Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines MACT (Part 63), A: General Provisions MACT (Part 63), Z:ZZ:Z: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines Title V (Part 70) Area Source Project Description The owner/operator has requested an AO for a portable source. The portable source belongs to the nonmetallic mineral processing industry, including aggregate processing plants, concrete batch plants, hot mix asphalt plants, and stationary diesel.fired engines. R. Chapman Construction is proposing to add 400 tph hot mix asphalt (HMA) plant The HMA Plant equipment includes conveyor belts, screens, drum heater/mixer, bag house, lime silo, load out silo, and an asphalt cement tank. SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. (R307401] 12 Modifications to the eqwpment or processes approved by this AO that could affect the emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R307 40 l • l] 1.3 All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon request, and the records shall include the two-year period prior to the date of the request. Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records shall be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8] 1.4 At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners and operators shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and ID811ltenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of the source. All maintenance performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-4014] 1.5 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns. [R307-107] I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories. [R307-150] 1.7 All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used m the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions refer to those rules. [R307-101] DAQE-AN132670009-21 PageS II.A II.A.I II.A.2 II.A.3 SECTION II: PERMITTED EQUIPMENT THE APPROVED EQUIPMENT Portable Source Including: Aggregate Processing Equipment, Concrete Batching Equipment, Hot Mix Asphalt Equipment, and Diesel-Fired Engines Aggregate Processing Plants These plants may be subject to NSPS Subpart 000 Requirements These plants include: A. Crushers B. Screens C. Wash Plants D. Conveyors, Feeders, Hoppers, and Stackers Concrete Batch Plants These plants include: A. Central-Mix Concrete Batch Plants B. Truck-Mix Concrete Batch Plants C. Baghouses, Bin Vents, Dust Collectors and Fabric Filters D. Storage Silos -Contents include: i. Cement ii. Fly Ash iii. Lime iv. Concrete Additives E. Boilers & Water Heaters 1. Fuel: Natural Gas/Propane ii. Rating: less than 10 MMBtu/br each F. Conveyors, Feeders, Hoppers, Pugmills, and Stackers DAQE-ANl 32670009-21 Page6 II.A.4 II.A.5 II.A.6 Hot Mix Asphalt Plants These plants may be subject to NSPS Subpart I Requirements These plants include: A. Drum-Mix Hot Mix Asphalt Plants B. Baghouses, Bin Vents, Dust Collectors and Fabric Filters C. Storage Silos -Contents include: i. Lime ii. Hot Mix Asphalt iii. RAP iv. Hot Mix Asphalt Additives D. Conveyors, Feeders, Hoppers, Mixers, Pugmills, and Stackers Stationary Diesel-Fired Engines These stationary engines produce mechanical or electrical power to operate the plants in this AO. These stationary engines are subject to MACT Subpart Z:Z:ZZ Requirements These stationary engines may be subject to NSPS Subpart fill Requirements Storage Tanks Contents include: A. Asphalt Cement B. Diesel Fuel C. On-Specification Used Oil D. Gasoline E. Propane SECTION II: SPECIAL PROVISIONS ll.B REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS II.B.l.a The owner/operator shall submit a Notice of Temporary Relocation and obtain a Temporary Relocation Approval Letter prior to operating a portable source at any location. [R307-401-8] DAQE-AN132670009-2 l Page7 II.B.1.a.l 11.B.2 11.B.2.a II.B.2.a.l 11.B.3 11.B.3.a 11.B.3.a.l Notices of Temporary Relocation shall include the following information (Form 15a is available from the DAQ): A. The address and driving directions of the proposed location B. A list of the equipment to be operated at the proposed location, including: 1. The type of equipment 2. The rated capacity of the equipment 3. The date of manufacture of the equipment C. A site diagram showing the general equipment location on site (to scale), and the distance to the nearest houses, barns or commercial operations (to scale if the plant boundary is located within one mile of these buildings) D. The expected startup and completion dates for operating at the proposed location. E. The expected hours of operation, including start and stop times F. The emission control measures that the owner/operator P,roposes to adopt for each emission point at each location; including a FDCP specific to the proposed location G. A reference to this AO [R307-401-8] Temuorarv Relocation Aonroval Letter: The owner/operator shall operate and conduct its operations of the aggregate processing plants, the concrete batch plants, the hot mix asphalt plants, and the diesel-fired engines in accordance with the terms and conditions ofthis AO and the tenns and conditions of the Temporary Relocation Approval Letter issued by the Director for each relocation. In the case of any discrepancy between the conditions of this AO and the Temporary Relocation Approval Letter, the owner/operator shall comply with the site-specific requirements in the Temporary Relocation Approval Letter. [R307-401-8] Portable sources that plan to relocate to a stationary source listed in the Utah PM10 or PMi.s State Implementation Plan (SIP) shall comply with the standards and adopt the control strategies listed in the PM10 or PM2.s SIP for the stationary source in addition to the requirements of this AO and the Temporary Relocation Approval Letter. [R307-401-8] Ouerations at Temuorarv Locations: The owner/operator may temporarily relocate this portable source to any temporary location. The temporary relocation shall not exceed 180 working days and shall not exceed 365 consecutive days. If a temporary relocation is expected to exceed 180 working days, the owner/operator shall submit an NOi in accordance with R307-401 for a permanent source and obtain a valid AO prior to the end of the 180 working days. [R307-401-17] The owner/operator shall keep and maintain the following records on site: A. The initial relocation date at each location B. Working days at each location C. Consecutive days at each location [R307-401-17] DAQE-AN132670009-21 Page8 II.B.3.a.2 The owner/operator shall submit records of the working days at each site and the consecutive days at each site to the Director at the end of each 180 calendar days. [R307-401-17) II.B.3.b The owner/operator shall not exceed the daily production limit specified in the Temporary Relocation Approval Letter. [R307-401-8) 11.B.3.b.l The dally production shall be determined by belt scale records, scale house records, vendor receipts or by any other method as acceptable to the Director or the Director's representative. [R307-401-8] Il.B.3.b.2 The owner/operator shall keep and maintain the following production records on site for all periods that the portable source is in operation at any location: A. The date production occurs at each location B. The production for that date at each location C. · The total production at each location [R307-401-8] 11.B.3.b.3 The owner/operator shall subm1t records of the actual production rate to the Director at the end of each 180 calendar days. [R307-401-17) 11.B.3.c The owner/operator shall only operate between 6:00 AM and 10:00PM each day. The hours of operation may be altered upon approval of the Director; however, any request for a change in these hours shall include modeling showing that all NAAQS are met. [R307-401-8] 11.B.3.c.l -The owner/operator shall keep and maintain the following records of operation for all periods that the portable source is in operation at any location: A. The time operations began each day at each location B. The time operations ended each day at each location [R307-401-8] 11.B.3.d Unless otherwise specified in this AO, the owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any installation of this AO to exceed 20 percent opacity. [R307-201-3, R307-305-3] II.B.3.d.l Unless otherwise specified in this AO, opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. [R307-201-3, R307-305-3] 11.B.4 Emission Estimates and Emissions Inventory: 11.B.4.a The owner/operator shall estimate the actual emissions that resulted from operating at each location. These emissions shall be summarized for each piece of equipment, each source of fugitive dust, and each source of fugitive emissions at the completion of operation at each location. The Director may require a summary of emissions for each location at any time. [R307-401-8, R307-150-l] DAQE-AN132670009-21 Page9 II.B.4.a.1 Records of actual emissions shall be kept for each location. Records of actual emissions shall include the following: A. The emission factors used to estimate emissions for each location B. All variables (production, hours of operation, haul road lengths, etc.) used in the emission estimates for each location C. The actual emissions from each location, which includes emissions from each emission unit, each source of fugitive dust, and each source of fugitive emissions [R307-401-8, R307-150-1] -II.B.5 Haul Roads and Fueitive Dust Sources: II.B.S.a The owner/operator shall comply with a FDCP consistent with R307-309-6 for each location. The FDCP for a location shall address the control of all fugitive dust sources at that location. [R307-401-8] II.B.5.b The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from haul roads and fugitive dust sources to exceed 20 percent opacity on site and 10 percent at the property boundary for each temporary location. [R307-205-4, R307-309-5, R307-401-8] II.B.5.b.l Visible emission determinations for fugitive dust from haul roads and operational areas shall use procedures si.tn.ilac to Method 9. The normal requirement for observations to be made at 15- second intervals over a six-minute period, however, shall not apply. Visible emissions shall be measured at the densest point of the plume but at a point not less than one-half vehicle length behind the vehicle and not·less than one-half the height of the vehicle. [R307-205-4, R307-309-5, R307-401-8] 11.B.5.c The owner/operator shall use water application or other control options contained in R307-309 to minimize emissions from fugitive dust and fugitive emissions sources, including haul roads, storage piles, and disturbed areas. Controls shall be applied to ensure the opacity limits in this AO are not exceeded. [R307-309, R307-401-8] II.B.6 Aeereeate Processine Plants: II.B.6.a The owner/ope1ator shall not allow visible emissions from any crusher subject to this AO to exceed 12 percent opacity. [40 CFR 60 Subpart 000, R307-401-8] II.B.6.b The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any screen subject to this AO to exceed 7 percent opacity. (40 CFR 60 Subpart 000, R307-401-8] 11.B.6.c The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any conveyor transfer point subject to this AO to exceed 7 percent opacity. [40 CFR 60 Subpart 000, R307-401 -8] II.B.6.d The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any conveyor drop point at each temporary location to exceed 20 percent opacity. [R307-205-4, R307-309-5, R307-401-8] II.B.6.e The owner/ohcrator shall install water sprays on all crushers, all screens, all conveyor transfer points, and a conveyor drop points at each location to control emissions. Sprays shall operate as required to ensure the opacity limits in this AO are not exceeded. [R307-401-8] 11.B.6.f The owner/operator shall perform monthly penodic inspections to check that water is flowing to discharge spray nozzles associated with each crusher, screen, and conveyor. If the owner/operator finds that water is not flowing properly during an inspection of the water spray nozzles, the owner/operator shall initiate corrective action within 24 hours and complete corrective action as expediently as practical. [40 CFR 60 Subpart 000, R307-401-8] DAQE-AN132670009-21 Page 10 II.B.6.f.1 Records of the water sprays inspections shall be kept and maintained in a logbook for all periods when the plant is in operation. The records shall include the following items: A. Date the inspections were made B. AIJ.y corrective actions taken C. Control mechanism used if sprays are not operating. [40 CFR 60 Subpart 000, R307-401-8] 11.B.7 Crushers. Screens. and Conveyors subject to NSPS Subpart 000: 11.B.7.a The owner/operator snail conduct an initial performance test for all crushers, screens, and conveyor transfer points subject to this AO that are subject to NSPS 000. Performance tests shall meet the limitations specified in Table 3 to Subpart 000. [ 40 CFR 60 Subpart 000] II.B.7.a.l Initial performance tests for fugitive emissions limits shall be conducted according to 40 CFR 60.675(c). The owner or operator may use methods and procedures specified in 40 CFR 60.675(e) as alternatives to the reference methods and procedures specified in 40 CFR 60.675(c). [40 CFR 60 Subpart 000] Il.B.7.a.2 The owner/operator shall keep and mamtain records of the initial performance test for each crusher, screen, and conveyor for the life of the equipment The record of the initial performance test must be made available to the Director or the Director's representative upon request [40 CFR 60 Subpart 000, R307-401-8] 11.B.8 Concrete Batch Plants: Il.B.8.a The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any concrete batch plant and the associated equipment subject to this AO to exceed 7 percent opacity. [R307-401-8] II.B.8.b Each storage silo associated with a concrete batch plant subject to this AO shall be equipped with a fabric filter, a baghouse, a bin vent, or a dust collector to control particulate emissions generated during filling of the silos. [R307-401-8] 11.B.9 Hot Mix Asphalt Plants: II.B.9.a The owner/operator shall use natural gas, propane, fuel oil, on-specification used oil as defined in R315-15, or any combination thereof as fuel in the hot mix asphalt plants subject to this AO. [R307-401-8] II.B.9.b The sulfur content of any fuel oil burned in the hot mix asphalt plants subject to this AO shall not exceed 15 ppm by weight. [R307-401-8] II.B.9.b.1 The sulfur content shall be determined by ASTM Method D2880-71, D4294-89, or approved equivalent. Certification of fuel oil shall be either by the owner/operator's own testing or by test reports from the fuel oil marketer. [R307-203-l, R307-401-8] II.B.9.b.2 The owner/operator shall keep and maintain records of the test certification of sulfur content in fuel oil. Records of the test certifications shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. [R307-203-l, R307-401-8] 11.B.9.c The owner/operator shall use a baghouse to control particulate emissions from each hot mix asphalt plant dryer subject to this AO. [R307-401-8] 11.B.9.d The owner/operator shall install a manometer or magnehelic pressure gauge to measure the differential pressure across each baghouse. The static pressure differential across each baghouse shall be between 3.0 to 7.0 inches of water column. [R307-401-8] . DAQE-AN132670009-21 Page 11 Il.B.9.d.1 The pressure gauge shall be located such that an inspector/operator can safely read the indicator at any time. The pressure gauge shall measure the pressure drop in I -inch water column increments or less. The pressure gauge shall be calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions at least once every 12 months. [R307-401-8] 11.B.9.d.2 The owner/operator shall record the reading of the pressure gauge at least once per operating day. [R307-401-8] Il.B.9.e Each storage silo associated with a hot mix asphalt plant subject to this AO shall be equipped with a fabric filter, a baghouse, a bin vent, or a dust collector to control particulate emissions generated during filling of the silos. [R307-401-8] Il.B.9.f The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any baghouse, bin vent, dust collector or fabric filter associated with a hot mix asphalt plant subject to this AO to exceed 10 percent opacity. [R307-401-8] Il.B.9.g Concentrations in the exhaust stream from each asphalt drum mixer subject to this AO shall not exceed 0.030 grains/dscf of PM, 0.024 grains/dscf of PM10, and 0.024 grains/dscf of PMi.s. [R307-401-8] Il.B.9.g.1 Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations stated in the above condition shall be performed as specified below: Emission Point: Drum Mixer exhaust passing through the baghouse Pollutant PM Testing Status • Test Frequency # PMi.s ** # @ ** @ ** @ Initial compliance testing is required for each plant The initial test date shall be performed as soon as possible and in no case later than 180 days after the startup of a new or modified emission source. A compliance test is required on a modified emission point that has an emission rate limit. Initial test is not required unless specified by the Director. Initial test is required. Subsequent tests shall only be performed for PM10 and PM2.S- Test every three years, or sooner if required by the Director. Tests may be required if the source is suspected to be in violation with other conditions of this AO. [R307-165, R307-401-8] DAQE-AN132670009-21 Page 12 II.B.9.g.2 A. Notification: At least 30 days prior to conducting any emission testing required wider any part of UAC, R307, the owner or operator shall notify the Director of the date, time and place of such testing and shall subnut a source test protocol to the Director. The source test protocol shall outline the proposed test methodologies, stack to be tested, and procedures to be used. If directed by the Director, the owner/operator shall attend a pretest conference. The pretest conference shall include representation from the owner/operator, the tester, and the Director. B. Reporting: Upon completion of the DAQ accepted testing methods, the owner/operator shall submit a copy of the results from each performance test as conducted to the Director within 60 days after the test has been completed. C. Sample Location: The emission point shall be designed to conform to the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 1, or other methods as approved by the Director. An Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) approved access shall be provided to the test location. D. Volwnetric Flow Rate: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2 or other testing methods approved by the Director. E. PM 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5 or other EPA-approved testing method, as acceptable to the Director F. PM1o/PM2.s For stacks in which no liquid drops are present, the following methods shall be used: 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, Methods 201 or 201a, or other EPA-approved testing method, as acceptable by the Director. The back half condensable particulate emissions shall also be tested using 40 CFR 51, Appendix M Method 202, or other EPA-approved testing method, acceptable to the Director. All particulate captured shall be considered PM10. The portion of the :filterable particulate emissions considered PM2.5 shall be based on information in Appendix B of the fifth edition of the EPA document, AP-42, or other data acceptable to the Director. For stacks in which liquid drops are present, methods to eliminate the liquid drops should be explored If no reasonable method to eliminate the drops exists, then the following methods shall be used: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, Sa, 5d, or Se as appropriate. The back half condensable particulate emissions shall also be tested using 40 CFR 51, Appendix M Method 202, or other EPA-approved testing method, acceptable to the Director. The portion of the :filterable particulate emissions considered PM10 and PM2.s shall be based on information in Appendix B of the fifth edition of the EPA document, AP-42, or other data acceptable to the Director. The filterable particulate emissions shall be used for compliance demonstration. The condensable particulate emissions shall not be used for compliance demonstration, but shall be used for inventory purposes. [R307-165, R307-401-8] DAQE-AN132670009-21 Page 13 II.B.9.g.3 G. Calculations To determine mass emission rates (lb/hr, etc.) the pollutant concentration as determined by the appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and any necessary conversion factors detennined by the Director, to give the results in the specified units of the emission limitation. H. Test Conditions All tests shall be conducted in accordance with R307-165-4. [R307-165, R307-401-8] 11.B.10 Stationary Diesel-Fired Eneines: II.B.10.a The owner/operator shall comply with the applicable requirements in 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ and 40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII for all stationary engines. An engine is considered a stationary engine if the engine meets the definition of "stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine (RICE)" in 40 CFR 63.6675 or "stationary internal combustion engine" in 40 CFR 60.4219. In determining whether an engine is considered a stationary engine, the time the engine remains at a location shall be considered. 40 CFR 1068.30 states that an engine is a stationary engine if: A. The engine remains at a location for more than 12 consecutive months. B. The engine remains at a seasonal source during the full annual operating period of the seasonal source. A seasonal source is a stationary source that remains in a single location on a permanent basis (i.e., at least two (2) years) and that operates at that single location approximately three (3) months (or more) each year. [40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII, 40 CPR 63 Subpart 'ZZZZ, R307-401-8] 11.B.10.b The owner/operator shall not allow visible emissions from any stationary diesel-fired engine subject to this AO to exceed 20 percent opacity. [R307-201-3, R307-305-3, R307-401-8] 11.B.10.c The sulfur content of any fuel oil or diesel fuel burned in a stationary diesel-fired engine subject to this AO shall not exceed 15 ppm. [ 40 CFR 60 Subpart IlII, 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ, R307-401-8] 11.B.10.c.l The sulfur content shall be determined~ ASTM Method D2880-71, D4294-89, or ap~roved equivalent. Certification of diesel fuel all be either by the owner/operator's own testmg or by test reports from the diesel fuel marketer. [R307-203-1, R307-401-8] 11.B.10.c.2 The owner/operator shall keep and maintain records of the test certification of sulfur content in diesel fuel. Records of the test certification shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. [R307-203-l, R307-401-8] PERMIT HISTORY This Approval Order shall supersede (if a modification) or will be based on the following documents: Supersedes Is Derived From DAQE-AN132670006-14 dated April 25, 2014 NOi dated December 2, 2020 DAQE-AN132670009-21 Page 14 ACRONYMS The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document: 40CFR AO BACT CAA CAAA CDS CEM CEMS CFR CMS co CO2 CO2e COM DAQ/UDAQ DAQE EPA FDCP GHG GWP HAPorHAPs ITA LBNR MACT MMBTU NAA NAAQS NESHAP NOI NOx NSPS NSR PM,o PM2.5 PSD PTE R307 R307-401 SO2 Title IV Title V TPY UAC voe Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Approval Order Best Available Control Technology Clean Air Act Clean Air Act Amendments Classification Data System (used by Environmental Protection Agency to classify sources by size/type) Continuous emissions monitor Continuous emissions monitoring system Code of Federal Regulations Continuous monitoring system Carbon monoxide Carbon Dioxide Carbon Dioxide Equivalent -Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 98, Subpart A, Table A-1 Continuous opacity monitor Division of Air Quality This is a document tracking code for internal Division of Air Quality use Environmental Protection Agency Fugitive dust control plan Greenhouse Gas(es) -Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 52.21 (bX49)(i) Global Wanning Potential -Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 86.1818- 12(a) Hazardous air pollutant(s) Intent to Approve Pounds per year Maximum Achievable Control Technology Million British Thennal Units NonattainmentArea National Ambient Air Quality Standards National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Notice of Intent Oxides of nitrogen New Source Performance Standard New Source Review Particulate matter less than IO microns in size Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size Prevention of Significant Deterioration Potential to Emit Rules Series 307 Rules Series 307 -Section 401 Sulfur dioxide Title IV of the Clean Air Act Title V of the Clean Air Act Tons per year Utah Administrative Code Volatile organic compounds R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan Appendix A.2 Current Calibration Data ,$ti'\ MONTROSE Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801} 794-2950 (801} 266-7111 Meter Box Calibration Data Form (English Units} Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 1/6/2021 25.56 APEXXC-522 DGM No. 323102 Average Yi Average AH Calibrated By Std Meter Yi 1.008 1.691 HH 0.99497 Orfice Manometer Std Test Meter Dry Gas Meter Std Test Meter AH/13.6 Std Test Meter Setting AH {VS) Ft3 (Vd} Ft3 (Ts)°F Average Temp. 0.50 5 5.007 60 0.04 60.00 60 1.00 5 5.011 60 0.07 60.00 60 1.50 9.996 10.026 60 0.11 60.00 60 2.00 10.001 10.044 60 0.15 60.00 60 3.00 10 10.047 62 0.22 62.00 62 4.00 10.003 10.036 62 0.29 62.00 "52 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time0 (Td i) °F (Td o} °F (Td}°F Minutes Yi Mi 76 58 68.25 11 .63 1.008 1.717 79 60 79 60 69.75 8.20 1.008 1.703 78 62 78 62 71.50 13.48 1.010 1.721 82 64 82 64 72.50 11.48 1.009 1.660 78 66 78 66 74.00 9.53 1.004 1.724 85 67 85 67 76.75 8.03 1.008 1.623 87 68 Average Yi Average AH 1.008 1.691 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 {801) 266-7111 Meter Box Calibration Data Form (English Units) Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 1/4/2021 25.42 APEX XC-522-10 DGM No.346800 -------- Average Yi Average AH Calibrated By Std Meter Yi 1.020 1.595 HH 0.99497 Orfice Manometer Std Test Meter Dry Gas Meter Std Test Meter AH/13.6 Std Test Meter Setting AH (Vs) Ft3 {Vd) Ft3 {Ts) °F Average Temp. 0.50 5.221 4.996 60 0.04 60.00 60 1.00 5.092 5 66 0.07 67.00 68 1.50 10.174 9.999 60 0.11 61.00 62 2.00 10.095 9.998 68 0.15 69.00 70 3.00 10.158 10 70 0.22 70.00 70 4.00 10.219 10.005 70 0.29 70.00 70 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time0 (Td i) °F {Td o) °F (Td) °F Minutes Yi AH 64 53 59.50 11.85 1.037 1.672 66 55 71 67 70.50 8.05 1.017 1.632 77 67 71 58 68.00 12.88 1.022 1.541 79 64 76 66 72.50 11.07 1.005 1.576 80 68 84 72 78.75 9.07 1.019 1.555 87 72 83 69 77.00 7.98 1.018 1.591 85 71 Average Yi Average AH 1.020 1.595 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Meter Box Calibration Data Form (English Units) Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 1/5/2021 25.42 APEX XC-522-14 DGM No. 266470 Average Yi Average AH Calibrated By Std Meter Yi 0.986 1.666 HH 0.99497 Orfice Manometer Std Test Meter Ory Gas Meter Std Test Meter AH/13.6 Std Test Meter Setting AH (Vs) Ft3 (Vd) Ft3 (Ts) °F Average Temp. 0.50 5 5.025 66 0.04 66.00 66 1.00 5 5.089 66 0.07 67.00 68 1.50 10.002 10.269 68 0.11 68.00 68 2.00 10.001 10.322 68 0.15 68.00 68 3.00 10 10.363 68 0.22 68.00 68 4.00 10.004 10.376 68 0.29 68.00 68 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average Time0 (Td i) °F {Td o) °F (Td)°F Minutes Yi AH 82 67 74.75 11.37 1.005 1.668 82 68 81 68 76.00 8.2 0.991 1.738 85 70 84 70 78.75 13.22 0.985 1.691 89 72 88 72 81.25 11.37 0.983 1.660 91 74 90 74 82.75 9.18 0.978 1.619 92 75 92 74 82.75 7.95 0.975 1.618 89 76 Average Yi Average AH 0.986 1.666 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84680 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Meter Box Calibration Data Form (English Units) Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 1/6/2021 25.56 APEX MC914-#2 Average YI Calibrated By Std Meter Yi 1.005 CG 1.00000 Flow Rate Wet Test Meter Ory Gas Meter Std Test Meter L\H/13.6 Std Test Meter (1pm) (Vs) Liters (Vd) Liters (Ts) °F Average Temp. 0.50 6 5.999 62 0.0368 62 62 0.75 6.001 5.999 62 0.0551 62.5 63 1.00 6.001 6 62 0.0735 62.5 63 1.50 6.005 6.003 63 0.1103 63 63 3.00 6.001 5.998 63 0.2206 63 63 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average (Td i) °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Yi 66 65 65.75 1.006 66 66 66 65 65.75 1.004 66 66 66 67 66.75 1.005 67 67 66 68 67.75 1.005 67 70 67 69 69.25 1.004 68 73 Average Yi 1.005 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Meter Box Calibration Data Form (English Units) Date Barometric Pressure Meter Box Number 1/6/2021 25.56 APEXMC623 Average Yi Calibrated By Std Meter Yi 1.013 CG 1.00000 Flow Rate Wet Test Meter Dry Gas Meter Std Test Meter AH/13 .6 Std Test Meter (1pm) (Vs) Liters (Vd) liters {Ts) °F Average Temp. 0.50 6 5.998 60 0.0368 60.5 61 0.75 6.001 6 60 0.0551 60.5 61 1.00 5.998 6.001 61 0.0735 61 .5 62 1.50 6.002 6.001 61 0.1103 61.5 62 3.00 6 5.999 62 0.2206 62 62 Dry Gas Meter Inlet Outlet Average (Td i} °F (Td o) °F (Td) °F Yi 67 67 67.00 1.011 67 67 67 67 67.75 1.012 68 69 67 68 69.25 1.011 69 73 68 71 71.25 1.014 71 75 70 75 73.75 1.014 73 77 Average Yi 1.013 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration Form Sample Box Number: AET lmpinger Boxes (Cal) Date: 1/6/2021 Calibrated By: CG Barometric Pressure: 25.56 Reference: ERTCO-105-SNBS APEX #1A (XC522) APEX #2A (XC522-10) APEX #3A (XC522-14) Nutech #1A Reference Point Number 1 1 3 4 4 5 5 1 1 3 4 4 5 5 1 1 3 4 4 5 5 1 1 3 4 4 5 5 a Type of calibration system used. Source a (specify) Probe on Probe off CPM Oven on oven off lmplnger ice lmpinger amb. Probe on Probe off CPM Oven on Oven off lmpinger ice lmpinger amb. Probe on Probe off CPM oven on Oven off lmpinger ice lmpinger amb. Probe on Probe off CPM Oven on Oven off lmpinger ice lmpinger amb. Reference Thermocouple Thermometer Potentiometer Temperature °F Temperature °F 247 248 66 68 65 66 241 240 62 62 37 39 65 64 244 244 64 65 65 65 249 251 67 66 41 40 66 66 249 250 65 64 66 66 251 250 71 72 40 41 67 65 b (reference temp. °F + 460) -(test thermometer temp. °F + 460) • 100< 1.5% reference temperature "F + 460 Temperature Difference b % -0.14 -0.38 -0.19 0.00 0.14 -0.40 0.19 0.00 -0.19 0.00 0.19 -0.28 0.20 0.00 -0.14 0.19 0.00 -0.19 0.14 -0.20 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration Form Sample Box Number: AET lmpinger Boxes (Csl) Date: 1/6/2021 Calibrated By: CG Barometric Pressure: 25.56 Reference: ERTC0-105-SNBS Reference Point Number Source a (specify) Reference Thermocouple Temperature Apex MC914-#2 Apex MC623 1 1 5 5 1 1 5 5 a Type of calibration system used. Probe on Probe off lmpinger ice lmplnger amb. Probe on Probe off lmpinger ice lmpinger amb. Thermometer Potentiometer Difference b Temperature °F Temperature °F % 241 244 -0.43 69 70 -0.19 37 36 0.20 70 71 -0.19 238 240 -0.29 66 68 -0.38 39 40 -0.20 67 69 -0.38 b (reference temp. °F + 460)-(test thermometer temp. °F + 460) , 100< 1.5% reference temperature °F + 460 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration Form Sample Box Number: AET Probes (Cal) Date: 1/6/2021 Calibrated By: CG Barometric Pressure: 25.54 Reference: ERTCO-105-SNBS Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocouple Number (specify) Thermometer Potentiometer Temperature °F Temperature °F a) Ice Water 34 34 2'-A b) Hot Water 149 151 c) Boiling Water 222 222 d) Warm Oil 238 239 e) Hot Oil 355 357 f) Boiling Oil 448 450 a) Ice Water 2' -B b) Hot Water c) Boiling Water d) Warm Oil e) Hot Oil f) Boiling Oil a) Ice Water 34 33 3'-C b) Hot Water 151 151 c) Boiling Water 220 221 d) Warm Oil 241 239 e) Hot Oil 351 349 f) Boiling Oil 450 451 a) Ice Water 34 35 4'-A b) Hot Water 150 152 c) Boiling Water 218 216 d) Warm Oil 244 244 e) Hot Oil 351 350 f) Boiling Oil 451 451 a Type of calibration system used. b (reference temp. °F + 460) -(test thermometer temp. °F + 460) • 100< 1.5% reference temperature °F + 460 Temperature Difference b % 0.00 -0.33 0.00 -0.14 -0.25 -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 -0.15 0.29 0.25 -0.11 -0.20 -0.33 0.29 0.00 0.12 0.00 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801} 266-7111 Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration Form Sample Box Number: AET Probes (Cal) Date: 1/6/2021 Calibrated By: CG -Barometric Pressure: 25.54 Reference: ERTCO-105-SNBS Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocouple Number (specify) Thermometer Potentiometer Temperature °F Temperature °F a) Ice Water 4' -B b) Hot Water c) Boiling Water d) Warm Oil e} Hot Oil f) Boiling Oil a) Ice Water 35 35 5'-A b) Hot Water 157 155 c) Boiling Water 217 218 d) Warm Oil 241 240 e) Hot Oil 356 354 f) Bolling Oil 449 451 a) Ice Water 36 36 5'-B b) Hot Water 154 155 c) Boiling Water 214 213 d) Warm Oil 243 243 e) Hot Oil 354 355 f) Boiling Oil 453 455 a) Ice Water 5'-C b) Hot Water c) Boiling Water d) Warm Oil e) Hot Oil f) Boiling Oil a Type of calibration system used. b (reference temp. "F + 460) -(test thermometer temp. °F + 460) • 100< 1.5% reference temperature °F + 460 Temperature Difference b % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 -0.15 0.14 0.25 -0.22 0.00 -0.16 0.15 0.00 -0.12 -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 {801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Sample Box Temperature Sensor Calibration Form Sample Box Number: AET lmpinger Boxes (Cal) Date: 1/6/2021 Calibrated By: CG Barometric Pressure: 25.54 Reference: ERTCO-105-SNBS Reference Point Source a Reference Thermocouple Number (specify) Thermometer Potentiometer Temperature °F Temperature °F a) Ice Water 36 37 6'-A b) Hot Water 145 143 c) Boiling Water 219 217 d) Warm Oil 244 244 e) Hot Oil 357 355 f) Boiling Oil 458 456 a) Ice Water 6' -B b) Hot Water c) Boiling Water d) Warm Oil e) Hot Oil f) Bolling Oil a) Ice Water 36 35 7'-C b) Hot Water 143 144 c) Boiling Water 221 222 d) Warm Oil 246 243 e) Hot Oil 352 355 f) Boiling Oil 452 454 a) Ice Water 38 37 8'-A b) Hot Water 141 141 c) Boiling Water 217 216 d) Warm Oil 244 246 e) Hot Oil 359 361 f) Boiling Oil 466 468 a Type of calibration system used. b (reference temp. °F + 460) -(test thermometer temp. °F + 460) * 100< 1.5% reference temperature °F + 460 Temperature Difference b % -0.20 0.33 0.29 0.00 0.24 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 -0.17 -0.15 0.42 -0.37 -0.22 0.20 0.00 0.15 -0.28 -0.24 -0.22 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801)794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 2'-A (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8/2021 Calibrated By: CG-HH "A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.43 2 0.43 3 0.43 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.59 0.6 0.59 Average: "B" Side Calibration Run Number P std cm H20 (inches H20) 1 0.43 2 0.42 3 0.42 A & B Average = 0.8407 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.59 0.59 0.59 Average: Cp (S) 0.8452 0.8381 0.8452 0.8428 Cp (S) 0.8452 0.8353 0.8353 0.8386 Deviation 0.0024 -0.0047 0.0024 Sl~id~ A 0.0031 Deviation 0.0066 -0.0033 -0.0033 ~ 0.0044 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 3'-C (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8/2021 Calibrated By: CG -HH "A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.42 2 0.41 3 0.42 Ps cm H20 (inches H20) 0.59 0.58 0.58 Average: "B" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.42 2 0.42 3 0.43 A & B Average= 0.8412 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.58 0.58 0.58 Average: Cp (S) 0.8353 0.8324 0.8425 0.8367 Cp (S) 0.8425 0.8425 0.8524 0.8458 Deviation --0.0014 -0.0043 0.0058 aside A 0.0038 Deviation --0.0033 -0.0033 0.0066 Sl.llJ&.D 0.0044 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 4'-A (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8/2021 Calibrated By: CG-HH 11A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cm H20 (inches H20) 1 0.42 2 0.42 3 0.41 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.58 0.58 0.58 Average: 11B" Side Calibration Run Number P std cm H20 (inches H20) 1 0.41 2 0.42 3 0.41 A & B Average = 0.8411 Ps cmH20 {inches H20) 0.57 0.57 0.57 Average: Cp (S) 0.8425 0.8425 0.8324 0.8391 Cp {S) 0.8396 0.8498 0.8396 0.8430 Deviation 0.0034 0.0034 -0.0067 2~d~A 0.0045 Deviation -0.0034 0.0068 -0.0034 ~ 0.0045 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 5'A (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8/2021 Calibrated By: CG -HH "A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.41 2 0.41 3 0.42 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.58 0.57 0.57 Average: "B" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.41 2 0.41 3 0.41 A& B Average= 0.8414 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.57 0.57 0.56 Average: Cp (S} 0.8324 0.8396 0.8498 0.8406 Cp (S} 0.8396 0.8396 0.8471 0.8421 Deviation -0.0082 -0.0010 0.0092 aside A 0.0061 Deviation -0.0025 -0.0025 0.0050 g:~id~ I 0.0033 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801)794-2950 (801)266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 5'B (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8/2021 Calibrated By: CG-HH "A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.41 2 0.42 3 0.41 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.58 0.58 0.57 Average: "B" Side Calibration Run Number P std cm H20 (inches H20) 1 0.42 2 0.42 3 0.42 A & B Average = 0.8415 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.57 0.58 0.58 Average: Cp (S) 0.8324 0.8425 0.8396 0.8382 Cp ($) 0.8498 0.8425 0.8425 0.8449 Deviation -0.0058 0.0043 0.0015 O§ldeA 0.0039 Deviation 0.0049 -0.0025 --0.0025 ~ 0.0033 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794--2950 (801) 266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 6'A (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8'2021 Calibrated By: CG-HH "A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cm H20 (inches H20) 1 0.42 2 0.42 3 0.42 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.59 0.58 0.59 Average: "B" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (Inches H20) 1 0.41 2 0.41 3 0.42 A & B Average= 0.8416 Ps cm H20 {inches H20) 0.56 0.57 0.57 Average: Cp ($) 0.8353 0.8425 0.8353 0.8377 Cp (S) 0.8471 0.8396 0.8498 0.8455 Deviation -0.0024 0.0048 -0.0024 ~ 0.0032 Deviation 0.0016 -0.0059 0.0043 aside B 0.0039 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 7'-C (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8/2021 Calibrated By: CG-HH "A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.42 2 0.42 3 0.42 Ps cm H20 (inches H20) 0.57 0.57 0.56 Average: "B" Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.41 2 0.42 3 0.42 A & B Average= 0.8519 Ps cm H20 (inches H20) 0.56 0.56 0.57 Average: Cp (S) 0.8498 0.8498 0.8574 0.8523 Cp (S) 0.8471 0.8574 0.8498 0.8514 Deviation -0.0025 -0.0025 0.0050 aside A 0.0034 Deviation -0.0043 0.0059 -0.0016 saii;!!::B 0.0040 Montrose Air Quality Services 6823 South 3600 West Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 (801) 794-2950 (801) 266-7111 Pitot Tube Calibration Form Pitot Tube Identification Number: 8'-A (0.99 corr) Date: 1/8/2021 Calibrated By: CG-HH "A" Side Calibration Run Number P std cm H20 (inches H20) 1 0.41 2 0.42 3 0.42 Ps cm H20 (inches H20) 0.55 0.56 0.56 Average: 11B11 Side Calibration Run Number P std cmH20 (inches H20) 1 0.42 2 0.42 3 0.42 A & B Average= 0.8519 Ps cmH20 (inches H20) 0.58 0.57 0.57 Average: Cp (S) 0.8548 0.8574 0.8574 0.8565 Cp (S) 0.8425 0.8498 0.8498 0.8474 Deviation -0.0017 0.0009 0.0009 asidgA 0.0012 Deviation -0.0049 0.0025 0.0025 aside B 0.0033 Montrose Air Quality Services Certificate of Balance Calabration Address: 6823 South 3600 West City/State/Zip: Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 Manufacturer: Sartarius Certificate No.: Model: Analytical Calib. Date: 7/6-2020#1 1/5/2021 Serial Number: Ball0530706871 Technician: Cheyney Guymon Identification: AET#1 Location: New Wells Next Calibration: 7/5/2021 Reference Weights Cal Id: Nominal Mass Indication Error Nominal Mass Indication 1 0.9999 -lE-04 1 0.9999 20 20.0001 lE-04 20 20.0001 so 49.9999 -0.0001 so so 100 100.0001 0.0001 100 99.9999 200 199.9999 ·-0.0001 200 199.9999 Comments: Pertinent Information: The artifact described herein has been calibrated using standards traceble to NIST. This Is to certify the data reported herein Is true and correct as the date calibrated. The procedure used to calibrate the artifact meets the requirements to meet American Environmental standards. Error -1E-04 lE-04 0 -0.0001 -0.0001 Montrose Air Quality Services Certificate of Balance talabration Address: 6823 South 3600 West City/State/Zip: Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 Manufacturer: Shimadzu Certificate No.: Model: Top Loader Calib. Date: 7/6-2020#2 1/5/2021 Serial Number: D446711AET #2439 Technician: Cheyney Guymon Identification: AET#2 location: New Wells Next tallbratlon: 7/5/2021 Reference Weights cal Id: Nominal Mass 1 20 50 100 200 Comments: Pertinent Information: Indication 0.98 19.97 50.04 100.09 200.07 Error -0.02 -0.03 0.04 0.09 0.07 Nominal Mass Indication 1 0.97 20 19.98 50 50.06 100 100.05 200 200.02 The artifact described herein has been calibrated using standards traceble to NIST. This is to certify the data reported herein is true and correct as the date calibrated. The procedure used to calibrate the artifact meets the requirements to meet American Environmental standards. Authorized Signature: _._...~---=:'.:::·========::::::!:r.•.----------- Error -0.03 -0.02 0.06 0.05 0.02 Montrose Air Quality Services Certificate of Balance catabratlon Address: 6823 South 3600 West City/State/Zip: Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 Manufacturer: OHAUS Certificate No.: Model: Analytical callb. Date: 7/6-2020#3 1/5/2021 Serial Number: 1292 Technician: Cheyney Guymon Identification: AET#3 Location: OLD Wells Next calibration: 7/5/2021 Reference Weights cal Id: Nominal Mass Indication Error Nominal Mass Indication 1 1.0003 0.0003 1 1.0003 20 20.0001 lE-04 20 20.0003 so 50.0005 0.0005 50 50.0006 100 99.9999 -0.0001 100 100.0001 200 199.9998 -0.0002 200 200 Comments: Pertinent Information: The artifact described herein has been calibrated using standards traceble to NIST. This is to certify the data reported herein is true and correct as the date calibrated. The procedure used to calibrate the artifact meets the requirements to meet American Environmental standards. Authorized Signature: __ ◄~---------~-· __ -__________ _ Error 0.0003 0.0003 GE-04 lE-04 OE+OO Montrose Air Quality Services Certificate of Balance calabration Address: 6823 South 3600 West City/State/Zip: Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 Manufacturer: OHAUS Certificate No.: Model: Top Loader Calib. Date: Serial Number: 1128451127 Technician: Identification: AET#4 Location: Old Wells Next Calibration: 7/5/2021 Reference Weights cal Id: Nominal Mass Indication Error Nominal Mass 1 0.9 -0.1 1 20 19.9 -0.1 20 50 50.1 0.1 50 100 99.9 -0.1 100 200 200 0 200 Comments: Pertinent Information: 7/6-2020#4 1/5/2021 Cheyney Guymon Indication 0.9 20 50.0 99.9 200 The artifact described herein has been calibrated using standards traceble to NIST. This is to certify the data reported herein is true and correct as the date calibrated. The procedure used to calibrate the artifact meets the requirements to meet American Environmental standards. / ~ Authorized Signature:_---~...::;;;;====--...;;;:;;,,-_________ _ Error -0.1 0 0 -0.1 0 Montrose Air Quality Services Certificate of Balance talabration Address: 6823 South 3600 West City/State/Zip: Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 Manufacturer: OHAUS Certificate No.: Model: Top Loader Callb. Date: Serial Number: 8350103094 Technician: Identification: AET#S Location: Gooseneck Next calibration: 7/5/2021 Reference Weights car Id: Nominal Mass Indication Error Nominal Mass 1 1.1 0.1 1 20 20 0 20 50 49.9 -0.1 so 100 99.9 -0.1 100 200 200.1 0.1 200 Comments: Pertinent Information: 7/6-2020#5 1/5/2021 Cheyney Guymon Indication 1.1 20.1 so 100 200.2 The artifact described herein has been calibrated using standards traceble to NIST. This Is to certify the data reported herein is true and correct as the date calibrated. The procedure used to calibrate the artifact meets the requirements to meet American Environmental standards. Authorized Signature: ~ Error 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.2 Montrose Air Quality Services Certificate of Balance Calabratlon Address: 6823 South 3600 West City/State/Zip: Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 Manufacturer: OHAUS Certificate No.: Model: Analytical Callb. Date: 7/6-2020#6 1/5/2021 Serial Number: 8329582368 Technician: Cheyney Guymon Identification: AET#6 Location: Gooseneck Next Calibration: 7/5/2021 Reference Weights Cal Id: Nominal Mass Indication Error Nominal Mass Indication 1 1.0001 lE-04 1 1.0001 20 20.0004 0.0004 20 20.0003 so 50.0001 0.0001 50 50.0003 100 99.9999 -0.0001 100 100.0001 200 200.0001 0.0001 200 200.0001 Comments: Pertinent Information: The artifact described herein has been calibrated using standards traceble to NIST. This ls to certify the data reported herein is true and correct as the date calibrated. The procedure used to calibrate the artifact meets the requirements to meet American Environmental standards. ~-- Authorized Signature: ___ ...... .--_:::--_··-_-_.· __ .... · -.:.-..,:.r_, _.,.._J,_. ____________ _ Error lE-04 0.0003 0.0003 0.0001 0.0001 Montrose Air Quality Services Certificate of Balance calabratlon Address: 6823 South 3600 West City/State/Zip: Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 Manufacturer: Sartarius Certificate No.: Model: Analytical Callb. Date: 7/6-2020#7 1/5/2021 Serial Number: A2{)()..S/35120053 Technician: Cheyney Guymon Identification: AET#7 location: Laboratory Next Calibration: 7/5/2021 Reference Weights cal Id: Nominal Mass Indication Error Nominal Mass Indication 1 0.9999 -lE-04 1 0.9999 20 20.0002 0.0002 20 20.0001 so 50.0002 0.0002 so 50.0003 100 100.0001 0.0001 100 99.9999 200 200.0003 0.0003 200 200.0002 Comments: Pertinent Information: The artifact described herein has been calibrated using standards traceble to NIST. This is to certify the data reported herein is true and correct as the date calibrated. The procedure used to calibrate the artifact meets the requirements to meet American Environmental standards. ~ Authorized Signature: _________ _ Error -1£-04 lE-04 0.0003 -0.0001 0.0002 R. Chapman Construction Company -Portable HMA Plant 2021 Compliance Source Test Plan THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT If you have any questions, please contact one of the following individuals by email or phone. Name: Title: Region: Email: Phone: Ms. Beckie Hawkins Office Manager Great Plains behawKins@montrose-env.com 801-794-2950