HomeMy WebLinkAboutDWQ-2024-006566In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, individuals with special needs (including auxiliary communicative aids and services) should contact Larene Wyss, Office of Human resources, at (801) 536-4281, TDD (801) 536-4284, or by email at lwyss@utah.gov at least five working days prior to the scheduled meeting.
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: PO Box 144870 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870
Telephone (801) 536-4300 • Fax (801) 536-4301 • TDD (801) 536-4284
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY John K. Mackey, P.E. Director
Water Quality Board James Webb, Chair Michelle Kaufusi, Vice Michela Harris Joseph HavasiJill Jones Trevor HeatonRobert Fehr Kimberly D. Shelley John K. Mackey Executive Secretary
SPENCER J. COX Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor
Utah Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting Via Zoom
Or MASOB 195 North 1950 West Red Rocks - Room 3132
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
September 17, 202411:00 – 1:00 pm
AGENDA A.Funding:
1.Review of Applicants ............................................................................DWQ Engineering Section 2.Discussion of Projects ................................................................................................... WQ Board
Next Meeting September 25, 2024 8:30am
DEQ Board Room 1015 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, UT 84116
DWQ-2024-006456
195 North 1460 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144870 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4870 Telephone (801) 536-4300 • Fax (801) 536-4301 • TDD (801) 536-4284 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY John K. Mackey, P.E. Director
Water Quality Board James Webb, Chair Michelle Kaufusi, Vice Chair Robert Fehr Michela Harris Joseph Havasi Trevor Heaton Jill Jones Kimberly D. Shelley John K. Mackey SPENCER J. COX Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Utah Water Quality Board THROUGH: Leanna Littler-Woolf & Emily Canton, Assistant Directors
FROM: Engineering Section DATE: September 17, 2024 SUBJECT: Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests BACKGROUND Due to limited fund balances the Water Quality Board (Board) has moved from bringing projects in on a
first come first serve basis, to reviewing projects during an annual application process. Applications over the past few years have exceeded available fund balances necessitating the need for the Finance Committee to meet and discuss options with staff. This meeting is used to help form staff recommendations that utilize
the available funds in a way to best support the interest of Water Quality and the Board. Over the past three years congressionally directed spending has utilized a portion of the base capitalization
grant and directed it to projects outside of the State Revolving Fund (SRF) program. Due to this, staff no longer makes projections of funds coming from the base capitalization grant until we receive grant awards from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). BACKGROUND ON EQUIVALENCY REQUIREMENTS As part of the EPA grant agreement for the Capitalization Grant and General Supplemental Grants, the Clean Water SRF (CWSRF) program must award projects with Equivalency requirements. Projects receiving funding from CWSRF revolved balances must award projects with Non-Equivalency requirements. Equivalency requirements are Build America, Buy America (BABA), American Iron and Steel (AIS), Davis-Bacon wages, Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), and Environmental Review;
sometimes internally referred to as CWSRF First Round Funding. Non-Equivalency requirements are AIS, Davis-Bacon wages, and Environmental Review; sometimes internally referred to as CWSRF Second Round Funding. In general, Equivalency requirements are expected to be fulfilled within two years of the
grant award. These projects must close their funding during the fiscal year of the grant and projects may be used to fulfill previous years Equivalency requirements but cannot be utilized for future years. Thus, we cannot bank Equivalency projects.
Page 2 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
For this cycle, the Capitalization Grant is $3,952,000 and the General Supplemental Capitalization Grant is $11,983,000, therefore $15,935,000 in project funding must be awarded with Equivalency
requirements. Currently, it is anticipated that Grantsville City (Grantsville) and Corinne City (Corinne) could include CWSRF Equivalency requirements; Provo City (Provo) only qualifies for CWSRF Non-Equivalency requirements; and North Fork Special Service District (NFSSD) and Beaver City (Beaver) will likely require Utah Wastewater Loan Funding. AVAILABLE BALANCES EVALUATION
Attachment 2 to this memorandum is a current Financial Report showing available fund balances. Balances can be brought up from Utah Wastewater Loan Fund (UWLF) to projects funded under CWSRF requirements. Thus, staff will focus on the total available fund balances. Due to Equivalency requirements the Board cannot award future capitalization grants until they are received. If projects will not require funds until a later fiscal year the Board may authorize loan repayment funds also known as revolved balances which is approximately $17 million per year. In addition, recently the Board has held back an annual reserve of $5 million in Utah Wastewater Loan Funding for potential emergency projects. Therefore, in Table 1 the cap grant amounts are not included in the total available loan funds. Table 1 also shows the amount with the reserve subtracted from the available funds in millions of dollars.
Table 1: Available Fund Balances
Funding Fiscal Year FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28
Total Available Loan Funds (without future Cap Grants) $31.0 $64.1 $96.9 $121.3
Reserve
(cumulative at $5/year)
$0 -$5 -$10 -$15
Available Balances $31.0 $59.1 $86.8 $106.3
Annual Available Funds $31.0 $33.1 $32.8 $24.4
The two-year average of the fund is about $32 million per year and the four-year average is $30.3 million per year. Staff believes the two-year average is a reasonable value to evaluate authorizations based on.
However, funds may not be available until FY26 for authorizations above $31 million. Utilizing these assumptions, staff recommends the Board authorize at least $26 million but not greater than $39.5 million in funding during FY25.
Page 3 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
AVAILABLE PRINCIPAL FORGIVENESS BALANCES EVALUATION
As part of the Attachment 2 Financial Report is an estimation of unobligated balances for Additional Subsidization (Principal Forgiveness). These are available balances the Board can award principal forgiveness to projects which will result in user fees greater than the State Affordability Criteria. The available principal forgiveness balances are shown below. Staff recommends the Board award $6.7 million in principal forgiveness. This funding would be part of the available fund balances in Table 1 previously indicated and not in addition to it. Table 2, below shows a summary of principal forgiveness
balances by year in millions of dollars. Table 2: Summary of Principal Forgiveness Balances
Funding Fiscal Year FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28
Principal Forgiveness Remain Balance $6.7 $12.7 $18.6 $18.6
PROJECTS FOR WATER QUALITY BOARD CONSIDERATION In June 2024, the Board received applications with the requested funding of over $101 million. As there are insufficient funds to provide the funding requested, it is necessary to bring the requests to the Finance Committee for review. Staff has a brief summary of each project in Attachment 1 and a cost model for each project as Attachments 4 through 8. Table 3, below, shows a summary of Funding Requests. Historically, planning, engineering, or construction
management services are funded by local contribution or from the Utah Wastewater Loan Fund or Hardship Grant Fund to avoid Federal Architectural and Engineering procurement requirements. Table 3 Summary of Project Requests
Entity Planning, Engineering, & CMS
Construction & Other Costs Total Project Cost Total Requested Funding
NFSSD $1,500,000 $10,141,000 $11,641,000 $3,551,000
Beaver $965,000 $6,572,000 $7,537,000 $7,037,000*
Corrine $1,431,000 $5,911,000 $7,342,900 $7,342,900
Grantsville $3,216,000 $31,417,000 $34,633,000 $34,633,000
Provo $368,000 $50,162,000 $50,530,000 $50,530,000
Total $7,480,000 $104,203,000 $111,683,900 $103,053,900
* Beaver is likely to be fully funded by Permanent Community Impact Board (CIB). See explanation in Attachment 1.
Page 4 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
PRIORITIZATION OF APPLICANTS
To evaluate how to authorize funds the Board must determine a priority system. Staff recommends evaluating the applicants under three Tiers. Tier 1 is rural communities unable to bond on their own for projects without a substantial growth component. Tier 2 is rural communities likely unable to bond which include a substantial growth component. Tier 3 is communities large enough to bond on their own. Tier 1 - Beaver and Corrine
Tier 2 - NFSSD Tier 3 - Grantsville and Provo STAFF EVALUATED FUNDING SCENARIO Staff has come up with three possible scenarios using different levels of funding. The tables below note the funding sources including: CWSRF, UWLF, Principal Forgiveness (PF), and Hardship Grant Fund (HGF) are all listed below. The First Scenario is presented in Table 4 below. The First Scenario would maintain authorization at or below the funds available through FY25 which is about $27 million. Table 4: Funding Scenario 1
Entity CWSRF PF UWLF HGF TOTAL
NFSSD $0 $0 $3,551,000 $0 $3,551,000
Beaver $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Corrine $500,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000
Grantsville $16,000,000* $0 $0 $0 $16,000,000
Provo $500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Total $17,000,000 $6,500,000 $3,551,000 $0 $27,051,000
* Project will be funded as an Equivalency Project to meet EPA Grant Requirements.
Page 5 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
The Second Scenario is presented in Table 5 below. The Second Scenario would authorize the funds available through FY25 and part of the funds available through FY26, which is about $31.5 million. The
Second Scenario is incorporated into the financial report as Attachment 3. Table 5: Funding Scenario 2
Entity CWSRF PF UWLF HGF TOTAL
NFSSD $0 $0 $3,551,000 $0 $3,551,000
Beaver $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Corrine $500,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000
Grantsville $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000,000
Provo $1,000,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $3,500,000
Total $21,500,000 $6,500,000 $3,551,000 $0 $31,551,000
The Third Scenario is presented in Table 6 below. The Third Scenario would authorize the funds available
through FY25 and much of the funds available through FY26 which is about $39.5 million. The Third Scenario considers anticipated loan repayments and brings back Beaver in the unlikely event that CIB does not fund Beaver as anticipated at this time. This scenario would be about $32.5 million without Beaver. Table 6: Funding Scenario 3
Entity CWSRF PF UWLF HGF TOTAL
NFSSD $0 $0 $3,551,000 $0 $3,551,000
Beaver $7,038,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,038,000
Corrine $500,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000
Grantsville $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000,000
Provo $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $4,500,000
Total $29,538,000 $6,500,000 $3,551,000 $0 $39,589,000
Page 6 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
Attachment 1
NORTH FORK SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT (NFSSD) NFSSD is requesting funding from the Water Quality Board (Board) in the amount of $3,551,000 to increase the capacity of the current facility to meet permit requirements. The existing facility capacity is insufficient to meet the current community demands, specifically higher levels of fat, oil, and grease and biochemical oxygen demand are limiting the hydraulic capacity and limiting the facility’s ability to meet
permit limits. NFSSD has received funding from the Utah Lake Preservation Fund ARPA Grant Program; Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity; and Governor’s Local Matching ARPA Grant Program. Funding provided by the Board would close the gap of necessary funding for this project as bids have been received. This project will increase the capacity of the current facility which will result in the facility meeting permit
requirements. Staff is supportive of this project as a loan from the Board. This project must be funded from the Utah Wastewater Loan Fund or Hardship Grant Fund Staff is supportive of this project as a loan from the Board as it would close the funding gap to complete the project.
FUNDING OPTIONS: 1. The Board could fully fund the project with a loan. 2. The Board could fund a portion of the project and the NFSSD would need to reduce the scope of the project to fit the available funding, or privately fund the rest of the project.
BEAVER CITY (BEAVER)
Beaver was requesting funding from the Board in the amount $7,038,000 (this includes the loan origination fee added by staff) for upgrades and reconstruction of the lagoon cells and the addition of an aeration system to the primary cell, a flume, trash auger, and other lagoon improvements, as well as construction of a lift
station, as well as some other sewer system improvements. Beaver lagoon system is organically overloaded which has resulted in the primary cells going septic. They have several industrial discharges that discharge an organic load that non-aerated lagoons have difficulty treating. The addition of aeration along with the other improvements will allow them to address their needs now and into the future. It is worth noting that they are currently self-funding around $300,000 dollars in sewer improvements, Staff has removed this from the financial analysis, as both a cost and an in-kind local contribution but it is worth noting for the Boards consideration.
Beaver originally applied to the Permanent Community Impact Board (CIB) for this funding, but staff encouraged them to apply to the Board as a backup in case CIB did not have sufficient funding available to fund the entire project. Fortunately, Beaver was placed on CIB’s Priority List with full funding so at this point it is highly likely that CIB will fully fund the project. CIB’s funding meeting will be on October 3rd which is prior to the Board funding meeting. In the extremely unlikely scenario that CIB does not fund as
advanced Staff will bring it back for the Board’s consideration in October.
Page 7 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
FUNDING OPTIONS:
At this time Beaver has placed their application on hold as it is anticipated to be fully funded by CIB. Staff recommends that the Board only considers funding of Beaver’s project only in the unlikely scenario that CIB does not fund it as advanced. CORRINE CITY (CORRINE)
Corinne is requesting financial assistance for $7,342,900 for collection and treatment system improvements. The total cost of the project is $7,342,900. Corrine owns collection and treatment systems and currently, both require improvements. Therefore, the collection system is anticipated to replace sewer lines and associated manholes and reconnect service laterals. Corrine also proposes installing new lift station pumps and replacing the force main. Corrine also is in the process of applying for construction assistance and is working on securing project construction funding through the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Rural
Development (USDA- RD). According to the Board’s affordability criteria, a sewer user rate should exceed 1.4% of MAGI to be considered for grant funds. Corrine’s 2021 MAGI is $50,700 which means rates should exceed $59.15 per month/ ERU for grant consideration. Currently, the monthly sewer rate is $78. Staff is supportive of this project and anticipates it will need to include some principal forgiveness and loan funds. FUNDING OPTION: 1. The Board could fully fund the project with a loan. 2. The Board could authorize a combination of loan and principal forgiveness and instruct Corrine to pursue the remaining funding from other sources such as USDA-RD. 3. The Board could instruct the Corrine to pursue full funding from other sources such as USDA-RD.
GRANTSVILLE CITY (GRANTSVILLE)
Grantsville is requesting funding from the Board in the amount of $34,230,000 for the construction of a new fine bubble diffuser biological nutrient removal (BNR) treatment facility with tertiary filtration and disinfection.
In 2022, Grantsville conducted a Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Study to evaluate options for upgrading and expanding their WWTP. Grantsville’s existing WWTP was determined to be at 95% capacity, with significant upgrades required to meet increasing demand and more stringent effluent nutrient requirements. An alternatives analysis was performed for possible upgrades to or replacement of the existing treatment facility, and the preferred alternative was the construction of a new BNR activated sludge treatment facility with tertiary filtration. In April 2023, Grantsville was awarded a $1,000,000 loan for the design of the new facility.
The project will include the construction of a new 3 MGD (average daily flow), 7 MGD (peak hourly flow) WWTP on city-owned property near the existing treatment facility. Facilities will include a new headworks building, anaerobic basins, anoxic basins, fine bubble diffuser aeration basins, blower equipment building, secondary clarifiers, and tertiary equipment to meet Type I reuse requirements.
Staff is supportive of Grantsville’s efforts to increase the capacity of their facility to meet anticipated demand due to growth, as well as updating their treatment facility to meet phosphorus effluent requirements. The construction of this treatment facility should meet both of those goals. Grantsville has performed a
sewer rate study which, when implemented, will aid in repaying construction funding for this project. Since
Page 8 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
Grantsville is over 10,000 in population and not in a producing county, Grantsville currently does not qualify for funding from USDA-RD or CIB. It is anticipated that the Board is the primary source of funding
besides the private market. Staff believes that since this would be a new treatment plant the Grantsville engineer could likely demonstrate the useful life of the capital assets majority to be greater than 20 years and thus allow for a term up to 30 years. Staff recommends a 30-year loan would be the best funding package for the project if this demonstration can be made. A partial funding package from the Board might consider reducing the
interest rate and result the overall same monthly sewer user rate with the combination of private/public funding. ADDITIONAL FUNDING OPTIONS: 1. The Board could partially fund the project with a loan. Grantsville would need to obtain private
funding for the remaining project funds. 2. The Board could instruct Grantsville to fully fund the project through private options. PROVO CITY (PROVO) Provo is requesting funding from the Board in the amount of $50,530,000 to construct a third bioreactor to expand the plants treatment capacity, construct a new collections building to store large equipment, construct an expanded administration building with a lab and maintenance shop, and to address aging infrastructure and equipment. Provo currently discharges treated effluent to Mill Race Creek which flows to Provo Bay in Utah Lake. Mill Race Creek is listed as Category 5 (not supporting) on the 2024 Integrated Report for E. coli and Benthic Macroinvertebrates Bioassessments. Provo Bay is listed in the 2024
Integrated Report as Category 5 (not supporting) for Eutrophication, Harmful Algal Blooms, pH, PCBs in Fish Tissue, Total Ammonia (as N), and Total Phosphorus. The improvement in effluent water quality discharged from this project will significantly improve the water quality discharged from the reclamation
facility and have a positive impact on the quality of the water in Provo Bay and Utah Lake. Major upgrades to replace the current treatment plant are underway. Most of the upgrades identified in this
2024 application were part of the original project but removed from the design due to costs. These additions will extend the capacity and life of the assets that are currently under construction. The additional work from this project would bring project estimates to $169,400,000 with current project funding of $92,800,000 from the Board. Staff is supportive of this project, but with current balances the entire project cannot be funded. FUNDING OPTION:
1. The Board could partially fund the project with a loan and/or principal forgiveness. Provo would need to obtain private funding for the remaining project funds. 2. The Board could instruct Provo to fully fund the project through private options. LEWISTON CITY (LEWISTON) REGIONALIZATION - UPDATE
Lewiston is pursuing connecting their sewer collection system to the Richmond MBR treatment plant. It will address current and future treatment needs by pumping sewer flows to the Richmond City mechanical treatment plant, thereby eliminating the current Lewiston treatment lagoons. Lewiston feels that this
regionalization of treatment will be a long-term solution for the community. Effluent quality will be greatly
Page 9 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
improved by regionalizing and treating the city's sewer in Richmond's MBR. This also opens up Type 1 reuse opportunities. Lewiston has updated their Preliminary Engineering Report and cost estimate for the
project. The project is now estimated to cost $8,290,000 to construct. In addition, Lewiston will need to purchase capacity at the treatment plant at a cost of $10,000-$20,000 per connection. Lewiston has an authorization for a $400,000 loan and $3,100,000 in principal forgiveness funding. Staff reached out to the United States Department of Agriculture-Rural Development (USDA-RD) staff and at this time it is anticipated that USDA-RD will fund the remainder of the project. At this time the Board does not have an application for additional funding from Lewiston.
DWQ-2024-006427
Page 10 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
ATTACHMENT 2- Financial Status Report
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal YearSTATE REVOLVING FUND (SRF)2025 2026
CAP Grant Base Program Capitalization Grant Awards (FY23)3,952,000$
Future Capitalization Grant -$ State Cap Grant Match (FY22)790,400$ -$
Future State Cap Grant Match -$ -$
CAP Grant General Supplemental General Supplemental Grants (FY22-FY23)20,361,000$ -$
Future General Supplemental Grant 11,983,000$ 12,169,025$ State General Supplemental Grants Match (FY22-FY23)2,036,100$
Future State Gen. Sup Grants Match 2,396,600$ 2,433,805$ SRF - 2nd Round
Account Balance 14,515,590$ 66,629$ Interest Earnings at 5.4310%722,647$ -$
Loan Repayments (5255)17,307,194$ 17,225,194$
Total Funds Available 74,064,530$ 31,894,653$ CWSRF Program Obligations
Admin Expenses for all CAP Grant Awards (1,561,240)$ (576,441)$ Cap Grant Principal Forgiveness (PF) (FY18-23)(9,133,980)$ -$
Future Cap Grant (PF portion)-$ -$ General Supplemental Grants (PF portion) FY22-23 (9,856,890)$ -$
Future General Supplemental Grants (PF portion)(5,871,670)$ (5,962,822)$ Project Obligations
Moab City (80,000)$ -$ Provo City 262 (8,800,500)$ -$
Provo City 262b (1,855,621)$ -$
Mountain Green (584,000)$ -$ Payson City (13,425,000)$ -$
Loan Authorizations -$
North Logan (3,500,000)$ -$ Mt. Pleasant (2,535,000)$ -$
Monticello (1,214,000)$ -$ Wolf Creek (6,404,000)$ -$
Brian Head (1,900,000)$ -$ Ash Creek SSD - Virgin (6,876,000)$ -$
Lewiston (400,000)$ -$
Planned Projects
Provo* ($50,000,000)-$ Corrine* ($7,400,000)-$
Grantsville* ($34,000,000)-$ -$
-$
CWSRF Obligations (73,997,901)$ (6,539,263)$ CWSRF Remaining Loan Balance 66,629$ 25,355,390$
Page 11 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
Addt'l Subsidy - Principal Forgiveness PF Balances (max for FY18-23)9,133,980$ 6,710,540$
Future Cap Grant (PF portion) FY24 -$ -$ General Supplemental Balances (PF portion) FY22-23 9,856,890$
Future General Supplemental Grants (PF portion) 5,871,670$ 5,962,822$ Project Obligations
South Salt Lake City (A)(2,584,000)$ -$ Millville City (2,750,000)$ -$
Provo City (7,000,000)$ -$
Payson City (1,000,000)$ -$ Hanksville Town (1,718,000)$
Addt'l Subsidy Authorizations Lewiston (3,100,000)$
Planned Projects Corrine*
Provo*Principal Forgiveness Obligations (18,152,000)$ -$
Principal Forgiveness Remaining Balance 6,710,540$ 12,673,362$
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal YearUTAH WASTEWATER LOAN FUND (UWLF)2025 2026Funds Available
UWLF 37,793,212$ 24,254,624$
Sales Tax Revenue 3,587,500$ 3,587,500$
Loan Repayments (5260)2,638,912$ 2,565,360$ Total Funds Available 44,019,624$ 30,407,484$
General Obligations State Match Transfers Base Cap Grant (790,400)$ -$
State Match Transfers Gen. Supplemental Grant (2,036,100)$ -$ State Future Match Transfers Gen. Supplemental Grant (2,396,600)$ (2,433,805)$
DWQ Administrative Expenses (1,898,900)$ (1,925,400)$ Project Obligations
South Salt Lake City (B)(4,891,000)$ -$ South Salt Lake City (C)(982,000)$ -$
Hanksville Town (150,000)$ -$ Grantsville (750,000)$ -$
Spanish Fork (4,400,000)$ -$
Loan Authorizations Long Valley (220,000)$ -$
Long Valley (1,250,000)$ Planned Projects
North Fork SSD* ($2,850,000) Beaver* ($7,200,000)
Total Obligations (19,765,000)$ (4,359,205)$
UWLF Remaining Loan Balance 24,254,624$ 26,048,279$
TOTAL LOAN FUND BALANCE 31,031,793$ 64,077,031$ PROJECT RESERVE (5,000,000)$
TOTAL AVAILABLE LOAN FUNDS 31,031,793$ 59,077,031$
Page 12 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
ATTACHMENT 3 - Financial Status Report – Funding Scenario 2
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal YearSTATE REVOLVING FUND (SRF)2025 2026
CAP Grant Base Program Capitalization Grant Awards (FY23)3,952,000$
Future Capitalization Grant -$ State Cap Grant Match (FY22)790,400$ -$
Future State Cap Grant Match -$ -$
CAP Grant General Supplemental General Supplemental Grants (FY22-FY23)20,361,000$ -$
Future General Supplemental Grant 11,983,000$ 12,169,025$ State General Supplemental Grants Match (FY22-FY23)2,036,100$
Future State Gen. Sup Grants Match 2,396,600$ 2,433,805$ SRF - 2nd Round
Account Balance 14,515,590$ (21,433,371)$ Interest Earnings at 5.4310%722,647$ -$
Loan Repayments (5255)17,307,194$ 17,225,194$ Total Funds Available 74,064,530$ 10,394,653$ CWSRF Program Obligations
Admin Expenses for all CAP Grant Awards (1,561,240)$ (576,441)$ Cap Grant Principal Forgiveness (PF) (FY18-23)(9,133,980)$ -$
Future Cap Grant (PF portion)-$ -$ General Supplemental Grants (PF portion) FY22-23 (9,856,890)$ -$
Future General Supplemental Grants (PF portion)(5,871,670)$ (5,962,822)$ Project Obligations
Moab City (80,000)$ -$ Provo City 262 (8,800,500)$ -$
Provo City 262b (1,855,621)$ -$ Mountain Green (584,000)$ -$
Payson City (13,425,000)$ -$
Loan Authorizations -$
North Logan (3,500,000)$ -$ Mt. Pleasant (2,535,000)$ -$
Monticello (1,214,000)$ -$ Wolf Creek (6,404,000)$ -$
Brian Head (1,900,000)$ -$ Ash Creek SSD - Virgin (6,876,000)$ -$
Lewiston (400,000)$ -$
Planned Projects
Provo* ($50,000,000)(1,000,000)$ -$ Corrine* ($7,400,000)(500,000)$ -$
Grantsville* ($34,000,000)(20,000,000)$ -$ -$
-$
CWSRF Obligations (95,497,901)$ (6,539,263)$
CWSRF Remaining Loan Balance (21,433,371)$ 3,855,390$
Page 13 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
Addt'l Subsidy - Principal Forgiveness PF Balances (max for FY18-23)9,133,980$ 210,540$
Future Cap Grant (PF portion) FY24 -$ -$ General Supplemental Balances (PF portion) FY22-23 9,856,890$
Future General Supplemental Grants (PF portion) 5,871,670$ 5,962,822$ Project Obligations
South Salt Lake City (A)(2,584,000)$ -$ Millville City (2,750,000)$ -$
Provo City (7,000,000)$ -$
Payson City (1,000,000)$ -$ Hanksville Town (1,718,000)$
Addt'l Subsidy Authorizations Lewiston (3,100,000)$
Planned Projects Corrine*(4,000,000)$
Provo*(2,500,000)$ Principal Forgiveness Obligations (24,652,000)$ -$
Principal Forgiveness Remaining Balance 210,540$ 6,173,362$
State Fiscal Year State Fiscal YearUTAH WASTEWATER LOAN FUND (UWLF)2025 2026Funds Available
UWLF 37,793,212$ 20,703,624$
Sales Tax Revenue 3,587,500$ 3,587,500$
Loan Repayments (5260)2,638,912$ 2,565,360$ Total Funds Available 44,019,624$ 26,856,484$
General Obligations State Match Transfers Base Cap Grant (790,400)$ -$
State Match Transfers Gen. Supplemental Grant (2,036,100)$ -$ State Future Match Transfers Gen. Supplemental Grant (2,396,600)$ (2,433,805)$
DWQ Administrative Expenses (1,898,900)$ (1,925,400)$ Project Obligations
South Salt Lake City (B)(4,891,000)$ -$ South Salt Lake City (C)(982,000)$ -$
Hanksville Town (150,000)$ -$ Grantsville (750,000)$ -$
Spanish Fork (4,400,000)$ -$
Loan Authorizations Long Valley (220,000)$ -$
Long Valley (1,250,000)$ Planned Projects
North Fork SSD* ($2,850,000)(3,551,000)$ Beaver* ($7,200,000)
Total Obligations (23,316,000)$ (4,359,205)$
UWLF Remaining Loan Balance 20,703,624$ 22,497,279$
TOTAL LOAN FUND BALANCE (519,207)$ 32,526,031$ PROJECT RESERVE (5,000,000)$
TOTAL AVAILABLE LOAN FUNDS (519,207)$ 27,526,031$
Page 14 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
ATTACHMENT 4-North Fork SSD Cost Model
Page 15 September 2024
Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
ATTACHMENT 5- Beaver City Cost Model
Page 16 September 2024 Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
ATTACHMENT 6- Corrine City Cost Model
Project Cost
DWQ Loan Origination Fee & Legal $73,000 Current Customer Base & User Charges
Permitting $30,000 Initial Total Customer (ERU's)328 Planning Advance DWQ $102,900 MAGI for Corinne City (2021): $50,700
Legal & Bonding $50,000 Affordable Monthly Rate at 1.4%$59.15
Engineering - Design & CMS $1,176,000 Impact Fee (per ERU):$15,200
Construction Lift Station $35,000 Current Monthly Fee (per ERU)$78.00
Collection System $4,756,000 Existing Debt $0 Force Main $347,000 Annual O&M $160,000 Contingency $773,000
Total Project Cost:$7,342,900 Funding Conditions
Loan Repayment Term:30
Project Funding Reserve Funding Period:10
Requested Funding $7,342,900 USDA-RD Funding Conditions
Corinna City Fund USDA-RD Interest Rate 3.250%
Total Project Cost:7,342,900$
ESTIMATED COST OF SEWER SERVICE
WQB Principal
Forgiveness WQB Loan WQB Loan
Interest Rate RD Grant RD Loan WQB Loan Debt
Service
WQB
Loan
Reserve
USDA
Loan Debt
Service
Total Annual
Sewer Cost
Monthly Sewer
Cost/ ERU
Sewer Cost
as % of
MAGI
Financial Burden
- 7,342,900 3.30%0 0 389,302 58,395 0 607,697 154.39 3.65%High
1,000,000 6,342,900 3.30%0 0 336,285 50,443 0 546,727 138.90 3.29%High
2,000,000 5,342,900 3.30%0 0 283,267 42,490 0 485,757 123.41 2.92%High
3,000,000 4,342,900 3.30%0 0 230,250 34,537 0 424,787 107.92 2.55%Medium
3,600,000 3,742,900 3.30%0 0 198,439 29,766 0 388,205 98.63 2.33%Medium
Cofunding WQB and USDA-RD
- 0 0.00%1,468,580 5,874,320 0 0 330,636 490,636 124.65 2.95%High
1,000,000 500,000 0.00%1,168,580 4,674,320 16,667 2,500 263,094 442,260 112.36 2.66%High
2,000,000 500,000 0.00%968,580 3,874,320 16,667 2,500 218,066 397,232 100.92 2.39%High
3,000,000 500,000 0.00%768,580 3,074,320 16,667 2,500 173,038 352,205 89.48 2.12%High
4,000,000 500,000 0.00%568,580 2,274,320 16,667 2,500 128,010 307,177 78.04 1.85%Medium
Financial Need Indicator Table 1 Financial Burden MatrixIndicatorsLocal Value State Value Score Weighting Factor Weighted Score Modified MAGIunemployment rate 2.7%3.4%1.65 4.00 6.60 FNI Below 1.4%1.4% to 1.75%1.75% to 2.1%2.1% to 2.45%Above 2.45%Poverty Rate 6.2%8.5%1.00 2.50 2.50 Below 1.5 Low Low Medium Medium HighThreshold LQI $37,125.00 $41,337.00 1.41 2.50 3.53 1.5 to 2.5 Low Medium Medium High HighPopulation Growth Rate 0.8%1.9%3.00 1.00 3.00 Above 2.5 Medium Medium High High High
Financial Need Indicator (Sum of weighted Scores/10) 1.56
2022 5 year ACS Table **
Page 17 September 2024 Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
ATTACHMENT 7- Grantsville City Cost Model
Page 18 September 2024 Water Quality Board Finance Committee Meeting – FY 2025 Funding Requests
ATTACHMENT 8- Provo City Cost Model