DSHW-2024-008171

CORPORATTON
RCRA FACILITY IIWESTIGATION. PHASE I WORKPLAI{
VOLI]ME THREE
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS
furil 1993
H
'I|-
rHLo
HH
b6)
or..€
H
1.,
IP
I'NIE ITI'I{BER: 1
IrNIE L,OCATIONS !{-186
I,IIIT DESCRIPEION: DrU.M StOrAqE ATEA
This storage facility is 80 feet long by 25 feet deep
and contains 5 storage bays, each with its own
containment sump. The building is walled'on three
sides with the east side open for access to store andretrieve drums. The facility is designed to store 400fifty-five gallon drums.
OPBRBEIOITAIJ DAEES: 1982 - PTESENt
I{AIIAGED IyA8!88 3
Waste solvents, paints and other industrial wastes. Fora complete listing of wastes stored at this facility,
see Thiokol's Part A Application.
RFA RECOUITENDArIOI{8 S
Ensure compliance with company operating procedures forthis unit.
IIIVEBIIIGAI'IOII PIrAltg :
This storage facllity is a RCRA regulated unit.
ThiokoL Corp. has prepared and submitted a closure planfor this unit with it,s Hazardous Waste PermitApplication Novetnber 7997.
NO FIIRTHER ACTION IS PIJANNED TN THE RFI.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
3 January 1991
I'NIE NI'UBER3 2
I,ltfE LOCIEIONS E-501
IrNIA DE8CRIPIfON3 Drum Storaoe Area
This unit is a permitted storage facility designed tostore 15O fifty-five gallon drums. There is secondary
containment sufficient to hold the reguired 10 percentof the maximtrm volume stored.
OPERETIONAIJ DAAE8. L982 - PreseNt
l[lltAGED f,488883 1, 1, l-Trichloroethane
nre RECOUUENDAAIONSS
Ensure compliance with company operating procedures forthiE unit.
IITVEStrIGAIIION PT,AIg !
This storage facility is a RCRA regulated unit.Thiokol Corp. has prepared and submitted a closure planfor this unit with Lt,E Hazardous Waste Permit
AoplLcation. Novenber 7988 .
NO FT,RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI.INED IN THE RFT.
A. Frank t{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
3 January 1991
I'NIE NI'UEER3 535
UIIII I.,OCAAIONS It[-705
IrNIA DEgCRfPtrfON: Hazardous Waste Storaqe And Consolidation Room
This unit is a storage and consolidation roon located
on the south end of building I.l-705. Hazardous'wastesare consoll,dated lnto lab packs and stored while
awaLting shipment off site for recycling, treatment,and/or disposal.
OPERATIONIIJ DATESS 1990 - Present
ItAttAcED trAgIE8: See ThiokoT CorEpratlon Part A ApplieatLon
RFA RECOI{IIEIIDA TONS 3
Ensure compliance with company operating procedures forthis unit.
rTVESIICEETON PIANS:
This storage facility operates according to procedures
outl,ined withl,n t-;}rle Request For Expansion of InterLmStatus For 1,1!-705 Storage and Consolldatjon Room 27
Augrust 799O.
NO FT'RTHER AqTION IS PI,AIINED TN THE RFI.
REFEREITCE DOCI'IiEIIII8 :
Request For Expansion of Interim Status For M-705
Storaqe and Consolidation Room. 27 Auarct 7990.
A. Frank lila1ker
Environmental Engineer
06 July L992
o
o
o
-I6)pEtrlOotcZVtrcd2
or{d
H
(,
IP
T'NTT NTIUBER: 3
t NIT LOCATIONS !{-136
UIIII DE8CRIPUON8 Hioh Enercrv Trenches #15, #17, #18, #19
These trenches are for treating high-energ1y solidpropellant wastes by open burning. High epergypropellants tlpically contain high-explosive
ingredients such as HMX, RDX, nitroglycerinr or TI{ETN.
The trenches are approximately L25 feet long, 4 feetwide, 2 feet deep and constructed in a rvrr shape.
OPERAIIOITAIJ DATES Z L962 - PTESENt
ITAITAGED NA8TE8:
Wastes extribiting ttre characteristic of reactivity.
PREVIOUS IITVESIIGAEIONS :
Thiokol routinely samples both the ash residue and
ground water in the burning ground area.
RFA RECOUITEIIDATTONs:
Ittaintain policies to assure waste reduction, recycling
and reuse. Air uonitoring for contaminantidentification, gualification and guantification should
be initiated. Containment to ensure waste does not comeinto contact with ground, and run-on /run-off control
measures.
rtnrEgrlcAllloN PLeNg 3
These burning trenches are RCRjA regrulated units.
Thiokol Corp. has prepared and submitted a closure planfor these burning trenches at I,I-136 with Lt-s llazardous
Waste Permit Application, November 7997.
NO ADDITTONAL TNVESTIGATTON IS PI,AIINED IN THE RFI.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
21 January 1991
T,NItr ITI,IITBEN3 4
IrNII LOCATION: M-136
IrNfT DE8CRIP8ION! Hicrh Enercrv Trenches #14, #15
These trenches are for treating high-energy solidpropellant wastes by open burning. High ener!rypropellants t1pically contain high-explosiveingredients such as H![X, RDX, nitroglycerin, or TMETN.
The trenches are approximately L25 feet long, 4 feetwide, 2 feet deep and constructed in a rrvrr shape.
OPERATIONEI, DAEES3 L962 - PTESENt
IiAITAGED f,A8TE8S
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
PREVIOUS I}IVESIIGATIONS S
Thiokol routinely sanples both the ash residue andground water in the burning ground area.
RFA RECOUI{EITDATIOITS !
Maintain policies to assure waste reduction, recycling
and reuse. Air monitoring for contaminantidentification, gralification and quantification should
be initiated. Containnent to ensure waste does not comeinto contact with ground, and run-on /run-off control
measures.
IITVBSTIGAIIIOIT PLEI{8 3
These burning trenches are RCRA regulated units.Thiokol Corp. has prepared and submitted a closure planfor these burning trenches at U-136 with it,s Hazardous
Waste Pemit Applieation, Novenber 7997.
NO ADDITIONAL IIWESTTGATION IS PLAI{NED IN THE RFI.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
21 January 1991
T'NIT NT'UBER: 5
IINIII ITOCATION: M-136
UNII DBBCRIPIfON3 Couposite Trenches #4,
These trenches are for treating waste compositepropellants by open burning. Composite propellants are
non-nitro plasticized propellants. Each trench is
approximately 3 feet wide, 1 foot deep, 25o feet long
and constructed in a trvx shape.
OPERATIOITAIJ DATES 2 L962 - PTESENt
IIANAGED f,48.|888:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
PREVIOUS INVESIIGAIION8 :
Thiokol routinely sanples both the ash residue and
ground water in the burning ground area.
RFA RECOUITEIIDAIION8 !
Maintain policies to assure waste reduction, recycling
and reuse. Air monitoring for contaminantidentification, qualification and guantification should
be initiated. Containment to ensure waste does not comeinto contact with ground, and run-on /run-off control
measures.
fII.8TIGAAIOU Pf.tANg:
These burning trenches are RCRA regrulated units.
Thl,okol Corp. has prepared and submitted a closure plan
for these burning trenches at !,t-136 with its Hazardous
a
NO ADDITIONAL TNVESTIGATION IS PI.AI{NED IN THE RFI.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
21 January 1991
T'NIT NT'UBERS 6
ITIIIT ITOCATIONs !{-13 6
UNfA DEgCRIPEIOtts ILluminant Trenches #3, #13
These trenches are used to open burn pyrotechnic
naterials or reactive metal powders. The trenches are 2to 3 feet wide, I to 10 inches deep, 150 Lo 200 feet
long and constructed in a rrVrr shape.
OPERAIIONAIJ DATE8: L962 - PTESENt
uersaero rA8rE8:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
PREVIOUE TNVESUGATIONS:
Thiokol routinely sanples both the ash residue and
ground water in ttre burning ground area.
RFA RECOUltEtlDl![IONg s
I{aintain policies to assure waste reduction, recycling
and reuse. Air uonitoring for contaminantidentification, qualification and guantification should
be initiated. Containment to ensure waste does not comeinto contact with ground, and run-on /run-off control
Deasures.
IIMSIIGAEIOf, PIrlItB:
These burning trenches are RCRA regrulated units.Thiokol Corp. has prepared and submitted a closure planfor these burning trenches at I!-136 with its llazardous
Waste Permit Aoolicat,ion. November 7997.
NO N)DITIONAL IIIVESTIGATION IS PI.ANNED IN THE RFI.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
2L January 1991
I,I{IE NI,I,IBERs 292
UNII f,OCAAIONS !{-135
UNIr DEgcRrPEIotts Metal Powder Burn Pits #L and #2
These pits are used exclusively to burn metal powders(i.e. aluminum and magnesium). These pits are
approximately 10' x 20' x 4'.
PREVTOUE IITVESEIGAEIOITS !
Thiokol routinely samples both the ash residue and
ground water in the burning ground area.
IIAIIAGED feglE8: Metal Powder
OPERATTONAI, DATES:L962 - Present
RTA NECOUI{ENDEETONS:
Maintain policies to assure waste reduction, recycling
and reuse. Air monitoring for contaminantidentification, qualification and guantification shouldbe initiated. Containment to ensure waste does not
come into contact with ground, and run-on/run-offcontrol Deasures.
IIM8EIGAEfOX PLAI{S s
These burning trenches are RCRA regnrlated units, andThiokol Corporation has prepared and submitted aclosure plan for them with it-,s llazardous Waste Permit
Apttrtlication Novenber 7997. Thiokol has submittedplans addressing run-on/run-off measures with its
Subpart X application. The soLls and ground water will
continue to be monitored on a routine basis.
NO ADDITIONAL I}WESTTGATION IS PI,AI.INED FOR THE RTI.
A. F. I{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
20 November 1991
UNIT NT,TIBER: 293
UIIIT ITOCAUON: ![-135
Irf,I|[ DE8CBIPIIOI! Hiqh Enerov Trenches #8 , #9 . *10, *11
these trenches are for treating high-energy solidpropellent wastes by open burning. High energrypropellants t1pically contain high-explosive
ingredients such as H![X, RDX, nitroglycerin, or TMETN.
IIAITAGED TAgTEg!
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic or reactivity.
PREVIOUS fIwES[fGlffONB r
Thiokol. routinely sanples both the ash residue and
ground vater in the burning ground area.
OPERAEIOXAL DAIES. L962 - Present
RFI RECoITITEUDAIIOf,SS
l,Iaintain policies to assure waste reduction, recycling
and reuse. Air nonitoring for contaminantidentification, qualification and quantiflcation should
be initiated. Containment to ensure waste does not
come into contact with grround, and run-on/run-offcontrol neasures.
IITVESIIGATIOIT PLIIIE :
These burning trenches are RCRA regrulated units, andThiokol Corporation hae prepared and subnitted aclosure plan for them with Lt;s flazardous Waste PermitApplieation November 7997. llhiokol has subnittedplans addressing run-on/run-off measures with Lts
Subpart X application. The soils and ground yater will
continue to be nonitored on a routine basis.
NO ADDITIONAL IN\IESTIGATTON IS PIJA}INED IN THE RT'I.
A. F. Wa1ker
Envl,ronnental Engineer
2O Novenber 1991
T'NIT }IT'}IBER: 504
IINIT I,OCATTOI| : M-].3 6
IINIT DESCRIHIfON: Sludge Burning Pan #2L
This unit consists of a metal tray in which sludge from
the M-705 Wastewater Treatment Facility is treated by
open burning.
OPERIIIONIL Dl8B8: JuIy 1989 - Novenber L992
ITANIGED TA8!TE8:
This unit receives wastes exhibiting thecharacteristics of ignitability and reactivity.
RFA RECOI,II{ENDATIONg S
Surface and groundwater monitoring should be ongoing.
The ash residue should be collected and disposed ofproperly. Air monitoring should be initiated for
contaminant identification, qualification andquantification.
INVESTICAIION PI.AN8 3
The M-136 Burning Grounds have been renovated to meet
Subpart X regulations and the capacity of this unit is
no longer needed for disposal of characteristic wastes.
A closure plan was submitted to the DSHI{ in November
L992.for this site.
NO ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION IS PI,AI.INED IN THE RFI.
REFERENCE DOCI'UENT8 3
Partial CTosure Plan ltl-736 Burn Grounds November 7992
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
29 March 1993
I'NIT IIT'UBER: 505
I,IIIT I,oCATIOf, : I{-13 6
IrNIT DE8CRIP'IIION: Sludqe Burnincr Pan #24
This unit consists of a concrete tray in which sludge
from the M-392 Special Containnent Vessels was treated
by open burning.
OPBRITIONIL DAfEgS JuIy 1989 - November L992
IiAIIACED rl8TE8 3
rhis unit receives wastes exhibiting thecharacteristics of ignitability and reactivity.
RFA RECOUIIEIIDIrIONS 3
Surface and groundwater monitoring should be ongoing.
The ash residue should be collected and disposed ofproperly. Air monitoring should be initiated forcontaminant identification, qualification andguantification.
INVESTIGETTOT PLANSs
The M-136 Burning Grounds have been renovated to meet
Subpart X regulations and the capacity of this unit isno longer needed for disposal of characteristic wastes.
A closure plan was submitted to the DSHW in Novenber
L992 for this site.
NO ADDITIONAL INVESTTGATION IS PI,AI.INED IN THE RFI.
RETERENCB DOCUUETTTS!
Partial CTosure Plan M-736 Burn Grounds Novenrber 7992
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
29 March 1993
T,NIT NUUBER: 505
T,NIT I.OCATIONI M-136
ITIIIT DE8CRIPTION: S1udge Burning Pan #22
ttris unit consists of a netal tray in which sludge from
the M-7O5 Wastewater Treatment Facility is treated by
open burning.
OPERAEIOITAL DITE83 July L989 - November L992
liAltAGED rAgrEg 3
rhis unit receives wastes exhibiting thecharacteristics of ignitability and reactivity.
RfA RECOll}tEltDlTIONg 3
Surface and groundwater monitoring should be ongoing.
The ash residue should be collected and disposed ofproperly. Air monitoring should be initiated for
contaminant identification, qualification andquantification.
I}IVESTIGATION PI.ATIS :
Burning Grounds have been renovated to meetregulations and the capacity of this unit is
needed for disposal of characteristic wastes.
plan was submitted to the Dstil{ in Novemberthis site.
The M-L36
Subpart X
no longer
A closure
L992 for
NO ADDTTIONAL INVESTIGATION IS PI,ANNED IN THE RTI.
RETERENCE DOCI'UENEs:
Partial CTosure Plan It!-L36 Burn Grounds. November 7992
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
29 March L993
I'NIT }ITIUBER3 507
T,IIIT I,OCAIIOTTI I{-13 6
IT}IIT DE8CRIPTION: Sludcle Burnincr Pan #23
rhis unit consists of a metal tray in which sludge from
the M-7O5 Wastewater Treatment Facility is treated by
open burning.
OPERITIOD{AIr DAlrEgs July 1989 - November L992
IITA}IAGED TISTE8 3
This unit receives wastes exhibiting thecharacteristics of ignitability and reactivity.
RFA RECOUI.TENDATIONS :
Surface and groundwater monitoring should be ongoing.
The ash residue should be collected and disposed ofproperly. Air monitoring should be initiated for
contaminant identification, gualification andguantification.
IITVE8TIGATION PI.AITS :
The M-L36 Burning Grounds have been renovated to meet
Subpart X regulations and the capacity of this unit is
no longer needed for disposal of characteristic wastes.
A closure plan was submitted to the DSHW in Novernber
L992 for this site.
NO ADDITIONAL TNVESTIGATION IS PI,ANNED IN THE RFI.
RBTENENCE DOCI'}TENE8 3
Partial CTosure Plan ItI-736 Burn Grounds November 7992
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
29 March 1993
T,TIIT NUT.TBER: 546
UIIIII I0CArIOlts ItI-136
UrtI! DESCRIPIIOI: Sludge Burning Pan #25
rhis unit consists of a concrete tray in which sludge
from the M-392 Special Containment Vessels was treated
by open burning.
OPBRAIIONAIT DATE83 JuIy 1989 - November L992
ITAIIIGED TA8TE83
This unit receives wastes exhibiting thecharacteristics of ignitability and reactivity.
RFA RECOUIIEITDATIOTS s
Surface and groundwater monitoring should be ongoing.
The ash residue should be collected and disposed ofproperly. Air monitoring should be initiated for
contaminant identification, gualification andquantification
IM/ESTIGAIIION PLANS3
The M-135 Burning Grounds have been renovated to meet
Subpart X regulations and the capacity of this unit isno longer needed for disposal of characteristic wastes.
A closure plan was submitted to the DSlm in Novenber
L992 for this site.
NO ADDITIONAL INVESUGATION IS PI,ANNED IN THE RFI.
RETERENCE DOCI'IIBITTS 3
Partial CTosure Plan It!-736 Burn Grounds. Novenber 7992
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
29 March 1993
oFc
H
t,
IP
I'NTT NI'UBEN3 19
I,NII L,OcAlIIOf,. u-225
UNff DESCRIPTfOX: Plant IrI Hiah Perfotmance Propellant Burninq
Grounds
ThiE unit formerly consisted of trenches, pits and
burning pans to treat reactive hazardous wastes by openburning. In JuIy 1990, Thiokol discontinued burning inthe unlined trenches and replaced them with burningpans constructed of steel and lined with clay. The tlpeof wastes burned at this facility include RDX, H![X,
IIIETN, BTTN, gas generate, nitroglycerine and otherhigh erqrlosives.
oPERAEIOIIIL DA8E8! 1965 - Present
}TAITAGED TI88E8:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
nFA RECOtil[ElIDlEIOltS r
Waste reduction, recycling and reusei Surface, ground
water and air monitoring with remediation as indicated
by analysisi Run-on/run-off control.
IITVESEIGATIOX PLNT83
A partial closure plan has been submitted to the Stateof Utah Bureau of So1id and HazardouE Waste, forreview. This closure pJ.an titled ltt-225 Partial
CTosure PIan, addresses only those unlined trenches
which are no longer used. Investigation activities are
ongoing at this site as part of the elosure and not aspart of the RFf.
NO ADDITTONAL I}IVESTIGATTON IS PI,AT{NED IN THE RFI.
REFERENCE DOCUUE$jr8S
tt-225 Partial CTosure Plan
A. Frank ltalker
Environnental Engineer
3 January 1991
oFrr
H
(.,
IP
I,IITT TIUUBER: 294
IINIT ITOCATION: f-LO
IINIT DESCRIPTION: f-L0 Burningr Area
fhis unit consist of a 3r x 3r cage used for the
burning of small amounts of test propellants and
scraped igniters. Also included in this unit is an
area where flares are periodically burned to test
performance.
I.iANAGED rAgfES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity
PREVIOUS IIIVESTIGATIONS :
SoiI samples were taken from the area around the burn
cage in March 1990. The analytical data showed that
the soils are non-hazardous. The ash has been sanpledquarterly as part of a routine sampling plan since
1986. The ash has also been found to be non-hazardous.
OPERATIONAIT DATES:L9 8 5 - L7 May l-9 91-
RFA RECOT{UENDATIONS:
SampLe/Ylonitor
fNVESTIGATION PLA![S:
A closure plan was submitted
site in November L992. This
as outlined in the plan upon
NO ADDITIONAL II.IVESTIGATION
to the Utah Dsfil{
unit hrill undergo
approval.
rS PI,ANNED FOR THE
for this
closure
RFI.
REFERENCE DOCT'T{ENTS:
CTosure Plan I-1-0 Burn Ground
A. F, Walker
Environmental Engineer
30 March L993
IVovember L992
I
I
I
oF
H
t,
IP
tE,tEt{oUIHerorEOt?AEErtrtt,lFr
CI
T'TIIT III'UBER: 20
IrlIfT IrOClSfONs l[-508-1
I'IITT DEgcnIPIIof,s Buildinq Discharqe to a DrainfieLd
BuLlding wastewater discharge generated by x-ray photo
processing, once-through cooling and a water softener.itris drainfield was abandoned in- 1985 and ieplaced by IrI-
508-2.
T,TAIIAGED TA8TE8:Industrial t{astewater
ANTTUAIJ VOIJIITIE DIECEARGED :L,300, 000 gallons
OPERATIOITAIT DltrE8:1950s - 1985
PREVIOUS nwEstlrctrrottS :
ThiE Eite iE currently under investigation as part of
@.
NTA RECOUITEIIDIEIOtr8 :
Soll and ground water sanpling with remediation as
indicated by analysis.
COTISTTTUETTTS OF CONCERTI :Cadmium, chromitrm and silver
ITTVESTIGAIIOII PL}T{S:
In April t987, Morton Thiokol entered into a Stipulation
and Consent Order with the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste
Cornmittee (Case Nos. 8502162, 8605402) in regards toseveral discharge areas. Morton Thiokol agreed toinvestigate these areas in a Soils Study Plan and tobegin closure activities based on the findings and
conclusions of the Coumittee. Environmental activitiesat this site will proceed as specified in the Stipulation
and Consent Order.
NO ADDITIONAL ASIION IS PLAI.INED AS PART OF THE RFI.
RETERENCE DOCI'UETTII8 :
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protectl-onReport Septenber 7997
UNItr NI'UBER: 23
ITIIIT ITOCATfON: t{-114
UNIT DEacRIPEIottr Buildinq Discharcre to a Dnruel1 and Drainfield
Building wastewater discharge generated by x-ray photo
processing, once-through cooling, BAC cooling, boiler
condensate, eyewash and a water softener. 'The discharge
was to a dr1meIl and drainf ield. The dr1mrell was
abandoned in L987, and the fixer and developer solutions
are now collected for silver recovery.
TiA}IAGED NA8TES:Industrial Wastewater
AI$IUAIT VOLUIIE DISCEBRGED :L,24O, OO0 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIT DltrE8: 1960s - Present
PBEXTIOU8 TIVESAIGATIOXSS
llhis site is currently under Lnvestigation as part of a
SolTs Study Plan.
RFE RECOUIIEITDATIOIT8 !
Soil and ground water sanpling with remediation as
indLcated by analysis.
CONSTITUETTTS OF CONCERTI I Cadnitrm, chronium, lead and silver
III'STfGATION PITADIS:
ln epril L987, I'Iorton Thiokol entered into a Stipulation
and Consent Order with the Utah So1id and Hazardous Waste
Conmittee (Case Nos. 85O2162t 86064021 in regards toseveral discharge areaE. Morton Thiokol agreed toinvestigate these areas in a Sol-7s Studv Plan and tobegin closure activities based on the findings and
conclusl.ons of the Conmittee. Environnental actLvitiesat this site will proceed as specified in the Stipulation
and Consent Order.
NO N)DITIONAL AqTTON IS PI,A}INED AS PART OF THE RFI.
a RETEREN.E DocuuEnr':
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectionReport Septenber 7997i GeohydroTogic Investigation
Photographic Waste Sites; StipruTation and Consent Order
Case Nos. 8502762 86O6402
o
UNIT ![UUEER3 24
I,NII r.OqeAIOX: U-636
UIIIII DE8CRfPTfO[! OLd Photogrranhic Processincr Discharqe Area
IIAITAGED TA8TE83 -
Solutions generally containing silver, cadnium,
chromium and lead.
OPERAEIONAI. DATEE: L962 - 1982
PREVTOUS rltVESIrCATIOtrS :
ThiE site is currently under investigation as part of aSoils Studv Plan.
RFA RECOIIITENDAIIOf,S:
SoiI and groundwater sampling with renediation asindicated by analysis.
IITVEESTGATIOX PIJNTS :
In April L987, Morton Thiokol entered into aStipulation and Consent Order with the Utah Solid and
Hazardous Waste Connittee (Case Nos. 85O2L62, 86064o2tin regards to several discharge areas. Morton Thiokol
agreed to investigate these areas in a rrsoils StudyPIan[ and to begin closure activities based on thefindings and conclusions of the Conmittee.
Environmental activities at this site will proceed asspecified in the Stipulation and Consent Order.
NO ADDTTTONAI. ASTION IS PI.AI{NED AS PART OF TIIE RFI.
REFERETCE DOCI'UEITtr8:
GeohydroTogie InvestiqatLon Photographic Waste Sites :
StiFlation and Consent Order Case Nos. 85O2762-
8606402
A. f. Ilalker
Environmental Engineer
19 November 1991
T'NIT NUUBER: 191
UNTT LOCETION: A-2
IntIT DEgCRfPrIOf,: Old Photocrraphic Processinct Drainfiefd
Septic drainfield which received large amounts ofsanitary waste and a snall amount of photogrraphic fixersolution. This drainfield was abandoned in L975 when
Drainfield A was instaLled acroas the highway to the
west of the adninistration area.
IIAITAGED TASTESS
Iilastes containing silver, cadmium, and possibly very
EmaII quantities of chromiun and lead.
OPERITIOTTIL DATESS L972 L975
RFA BECOtlllEttDATfOf,gs Sanpling
cOxgAITUElllI'8 OF COltCERlt: Cadmium, silver, chromium and lead
IttYEgfIGArIOf, PIrNtS:
This site will be investigated according to the A;].
Photographic Processing Draintield Investigation PTanfor the constituents of concern.
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
05 May 1992
I,NIT NI,I.TBER: 29O
ITIIfT ITOCATION: tf-3 9
I'TIIT DESCRIPTIOf,:
TIAIIAGED [Ag8E8:
Solutions
chromiun
OPERAIfOIIAL DATEE:
OId Photocrraphic Processincr Discharqe Area
generally containing silver, cadmium,
and lead.
L976 D L982
RFA RECOffiIOTTS:
Soil and groundwater sanpling with remediation asindicated by ana),ysis.
rltVEgErGlEIOlt PLIIIBT
In April 1987, Morton thlokol entered Lnto aStipulation and Consent order with the Utah Solid and
Hazardous Waste conmittee (Case Nos. 85O2L62, 86064021in regards to several discharge areas. Irlorton Thiokol
agreed to investigate these areas in a Sol,Is Study Plan
and to begin closure activities based on the findings
and conclusions of the Conmittee. Environmentalactivities at thiE site will proceed as specified inthe Stipulation and Consent order.
NO ADDITTONAL A TION IS PI,ANNED AS PART OF THE RFI.
BETBREUCE DOCT'}TEI8!8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground flater OualLty ProtectionReport. Seotenber 7997; GeohvdroTogie Investigation
Photographie Waste Sitesi StLoulation and Consent Order
Case Nos. 8502762 8506402
A. F. WaIIcer
Environmental Engineer
19 November 1991
I'NIT
UIITT
I'NTT
TTI'ITBER: 423
LOCATTON: U-508-2
DEscntPrlou: Buildincr Discharge to a Drainfield
Building vastewater discharge generated by x-ray photo
processing, once-through cooling and a water softener.itris arainfield was abindoned in 1989 at irtrich tine therinse water and spent developer were collected and
disposed to BIue Creek under Thiokol's IIPDES pemit andthe fixer solution colLected for silver recovery.
TTANAGED [ASTE8:Industrial Wastewater
ATTNUAL VOLUITE DTSCEARGED :11 300r 000 gallons
OPERATfONAIT DATEE: 1985 - 1989
PBEIITIOUS IIIVESTIGATTOUS 3
This site is currently under investigation as part of a
@.
RFA RECOI{UETTDATTONS 3
Soil and grround water sanpling with remediation as
indicated by analysis.
CONSTTTUETUTS OF CONCERTT:
IIMgffGATIOIt PIrAttB :
Cadmitrn, chromi.trm and silver
fn April L987, Irlorton Thiokol entered into a Stipulation
and Consent Order vith the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste
Connittee (Case Nos. 85O2L62, 8506402) in regards toseveral discharge areas. ![orton Ttriokol agreed to
investJ.gate these areas in a SoiTs Study Plan and tobegin closure activities based on the findings and
conclusions of the Conmittee. Environnental activitiesat this site will proceed as specified in the Stipulation
and Consent Order.
NO N)DITIONAL AqIION IS PI,AI{NED AS PART OT THE RFI.
O REFEREN.E DocunEr,rs3
Thiokol CorporatLon Ground Water Ouality Protection
Retrprt Septenber 7997
EH
E
IINIT NUUBERS: 27 , 28, 29, 30,
44, 47, 48, 49r 50,
64, 55, 66, 67 , 69 ,305, 306, 350, 482 ,
58',1 , 588
31, 32, 33, 35, 36,51, 53, 54, 57, 58,70, 7L172, 73, 76,
4go, 5L2, 569 , 57O,
38, 40, 42 , 43 ,
59 , 60, 6L, 62 ,83, 300, 301,
57L, 595, 596,
Irf,If frOCeAfOf,S: I.I-519 , l{-523, U-585 , I{-5961}.f-597, U-208 , U-5O4,
U-621, I,i-13, U-5O6, lit-L26, li|-629, I-10, l[-34, ll[-628, ![-
43, U-15 , U-27 , M-26, M-32, U-605 | U-622, U-590 , U-524,
U-5L2, U-693, U-694, IrI-191, U-309, U-19A, Yl-76lYl-L63,
u-L74, M-5941!,t-595, tt-501 , ltt-602ll{-503, U-604, IrI-690,
u-57A, il-24l, M-2O9, T-4C, T-92, ll-79, U-L97, U-320A,
U-193, U-224, U-590, Irt-638, l{-303, lt-354, U-676, U-7Os
UNItr DE8CRfPIfOII: Waste Propellant Docks
These units aretem storage ofconstituents of
program.
OPERATTOTTAI, DAtrE8:
waste docks for collecting and short
waste propellants. Quantities andthe waste vary with each propellant
Operational dates vary with each dock, but generally
span the period of tine beginning in L957 through thepresent. The summary tables for the solid waste
nanagement units provide a more detailed description ofthe operational dates for each dock.
lllltAGED IlgrEg!
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
RFA RECOffiIOITS:
No further action needed at this time.
IITVEgTfceTIOIt Pf,rll58: NO FT RTHER AgffON.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
11 December 1990
IrltIT NUltEERSs 25, 26, 37, 39, 4L, 46, 52, 55, 63' 74
IrNfE ITOCjAlffOltS: M-55, l[-98, U-218, U-Lz, I'I-120, lq-20, l/l-53,
u-623, U-589, T-zL
UIIIiI DE8CRIPIIOX3 OId or Inactive Waste Pfopellant Docks
These units are docks that are no longer in o=" or no
longer exist which were used to collect and store wastepropellants. Quantities and constituents of the wastevaried with each propellant progrram.
OPERIAIOIIAL DATEgt
operational dates vary with each dock, but generally
span the period between 1957 1989. The sunmary tablesfor the Solid Waste Dlanagement Units provide a moredetailed description of the operational dates for each
dock.
lttttAcED rA88E8s
Wastes extribiting the characteristic of reactJ.vJ.ty, aswell as solvents which are contaninated with
propellants.
Rll nECOlll[EltDATIOltg r
No further action needed at this time.
IITVESTIGAETOX PTrA[8S NO FT,RTHER AETTON.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
27 December 1990
IE
Nttr,toooc
74vt
UI -,
vtH
ET
or{d
H
(,
I
N
IrI{IE UITUBERS3 78, 81 , 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 94, 95, 98, 108, 303,
318, 330, 336, 339
UXIA LOGtrEIOf,8: ll-9B, l{-623, U-515, lq-629, U-62L, U-622, T-L4,
U-301 ,l{-32, li-627, U-1O, T-1, Itt-115, T-18, l".f-24, yl-76
IrI{fT DEgCRfPIIOtt: OId or Inactive Hazardous Waste Docks
These units are waste docks which are no longer in useor no longer exist which were used to coliect and store
hazardous wastes.
OPERAIIOUIL DATESS
Operational dates vary for each dock, but generally
span the period between 1959 1989. The summary tablesfor the solid waste management units provide a moredetailed description of the operational dates for each
dock.
UAITAGED fA88Eg3
Wastes odribiting the characteristics of ignitabLlity,toxicity, corrosivity and reactivity; Listed wastesconsisting priuarily of spent eolvents and solvent
rags.
RFI RECOUI,IENDIIION8 s
Waste mininization, reuse and recycle when at allpossible.
IITVESITCATIOU PIrATSs NO FT,RTHER ASTTON.
A. F. I{alker
Environmental Engineer
27 December 1990
mtIA IUUBERS. 82, 90, 9L, 92, 93, 96lLOOt 99, 101 | LOz, LO4, 105,106, 11O, 3O2, 3O4, 315, 329t 5L4, 531, 551, 553, 564,565, 566, 567, 558, 576t 579, 58O, 591, 582, 593, 594
U!tI:! LOCjATfONSS U-59O, !{-16 , lil-43 | U-L79, E-5L2, U-111/I{,-52, ![-
628, l{-53, lI-68, l{-113, E-517, I,t-585, T-92t T-AC, U-
6g9, u-194, u-321, U-705, U-303, M-79, U-120, U-27, U-5L2, U-573, S-633, U-137A, A-2, E-516, !{-191, l{-193, ![-325, U-593
IrNIA DE8CRIPUOXS 90-Dav Hazardous Waste Storaoe Docks
these units are used for collecting and storage of
hazardous waste. The wastes are collected within 90
days of when accumulation began, and taken to thepermitted storage facility at ltt-186.
OPERAEIOITAI, DA8E8!
Operation dates vary with each dock, but generally spanthe period beginning in 1957 through the present. The
aunnary tables for the eolid waste nanagement unitsprovide a nore detailed description of the operationaldates for each dock.
IIAITAGED IASTESS
Wastes exhibiting the characteristics of ignitability,toxicity, corrosivity and reactivity; Listed wastesconsisting primarily of spent solvents and solvent
rags.
RTA RECOITIIEITDATTOT8 I
Waste ninimization, reuse and recycle shen at allpossible.
ITIVESIIGATTON PTTATTE: NO FT,RTHER ACTION.
A. F. ?talker
Environmental Engineer
27 December 1990
ot-'
L.
H
t
IN
IINII' NITI,IBERS: 34L, 342 , 467
IrNIf ITOCAtrIONS: U-72, T-93 , I[-5
IIltfA DE8CRfP![IOI[: Inactive Satellite Accumulation lreas
These units are former hazardouE waste accumulation
areas located near the point of generatioF. Ilastes
accumulated at these sites were taken to a 90 day
storage dock and then to the pemitted storage facilityat I{-186.
OPERATIOUEL DATESS
Operational dates vary with each site beginning priorto 1990. The summary tableE for the solid waste
management units provide a more detailed description ofthe operatl.onal dates for each dock.
IIIITtrGED TA8!88:
Solvent rags and some reactive and ignitable wastes.
RFA RECOUI.IEIIDATTON8 !
Waste minimization, reuse and recycle when at allpossible.
IITYESTIGATIOX PLEITS! NO FT'RTHER ASTION
A. F. Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
27 December 1990
ul[Ir xInrBERS3 89, 97, 103, LO7, 109, 309, 337, 338, 34O, 475,
478 , 484 , 485 , 486 , 492 t 495 , 52L, 523 , 536 , 539, 550,
572, 5?7, 578, 589, 59O, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 595,
597, 598, 599, 600, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605
ultIr Locaarof,S. u-2o9, !{-605, u-504, u-65 t U-2, A-2, T-97, I{-104,
u-67, lI-113A, ![-120, U-L97, U-303, U-304, T-4, T-24, l[-
5L2, U-514, T-96, I,t-184, U-2L2, T-L7, T-9L1 E-515, E-
5L7, E-529, M-6, U-19A, U-27, litr'43, U-55r.1,1-574, U-7L,
U-1O2, Irt-l11 , !f-L74, If-2O8, T-298, U-24L, U-224
In[fT DEgcRfPTIotts Satellite Accumulation Areas
These units are hazardous waste accumulation areas
Iocated near the point of generation. Wastes
accumulated at these sites are taken to a 90 day
storage dock and then to the permitted storage facilityat DI-186.
OPERIIIOXAL DAI[88:
Operational dates vary with each site beginning priorto 1990. The summary tables for the solid waste
nanagenent units provide a nore detailed description ofthe operational dates for each dock.
IIIITAGED TI8!!88:
Solvent rags and some reactive and ignitable wastes.
Rra RECOUttEtrDATrOf,S 3
Waste minimization, reuse and recycle when at allpossible.
IIwESSIGAIION PLAIIS: NO FT RTHER ACTION
A. f. Ifalker
Environmental Engineer
27 December 1990
or.c
H
L,
I
N
UNIT NI'IIBER! 111
IINII f,OCe![IoI{3 Ir[-98
IrNIf DE8CRIPAfON! Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated ln the
manufacturing of propellant. This sump is constructedof steel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATTONEE DATES3
The original systen was installed in November 1981 and
replaced with the current system in October 1988.
UANAGED f,ASTEgS
The wastes contaLned in this unit are wastewater v O*7sludges from the manufacturing and processing of '\-explosives.
RFI RECOUI{EITDAIIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
')(
if
Sunps which have
removed.
Soils around all
upgraded should
constituents.
TTWESTTGAtrION PI,AT{8 :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorLights are found in the Thiokol manual, oisposalInstntctions tor Waste tlateria.Ls.
On 1 October 1987, the original sump was exanined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. l{hen the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Enviror:mental
Engineerr Do leaks or soil discoloration was observed.
on 24 october 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed into
service.
rhis unit ueets the requirements specified in cFR 40for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmenta} Engineer
9 January 1991
been abandoned or closed should be
sumps which have been removed and
be sampled for hazardous waste
I,IIIE NUUBERS I1,2
UNII f,OCAAION3 ![-13
IrltIT DE8CRIPEION3 South Hazardous Waste Sump
This unit receives uastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. This sunp is constructedof steel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIOITAL DAAE83
The original system was installed in December L957 and
replaced with the current system in Septenber 1988.
T{AITAGED trI8TE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:<plosives.
RTA RECOUITEITDATIONS :Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIVEStrIGAATON PI,NT8 :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Distrnsal
Instntctions for Waste ltlaterials.
On 1 October L98?, the original Eunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. llhen the old sump was removed frou service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
28 Septenber 1988, the new sunp was inspected by an
independent engineer prior to being placed into
service.
This unit meets the requirenents specified in 40 CfR
265 for a tank system.
NO FURTIIER ACTION TS WARRA}flTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
UNIT NI,IIBER3 113
IrNIf LOCAIIONs !{-13
IINIS DE8CRIPIIONS West Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater grenerated Ln the
manufacturing of propellant. This sump is constructedof steel reinforced concrete and is eqtripped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAIIONAIT DAEES:
The original system was Lnstalled ln December L957 and
replaced with the current system in Septenber 1988.
ITAITAGED f,A88E8S
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA REEOUUEIIDAIIONS S
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been renoved and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
ITTVESEIGATION PT.ANS 3
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal
Instntctions for Wast ltlatetLafs.
on 1 october 1987, the original sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the o1d sump was renoved from service,the area was inspected by a ThiokoL Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloratl.on were noted. on
28 Septenber 1988 the new 6ump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covingrton
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
UNIT NT,IITBER: 114
IrNIr LOCAIIION: l[-13
UNMEBCRIPtrION: Old East Hazardorrsiaste Sump
This sump received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant.
OPERIIIIOIIAIT DAIEE!
The systen rras installed in December L957 and remainedin service until Septenber 1988 at which tine it was
removed.
IttItAGED re8rE83
The wastes contained in this unit were wastesater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
Rre RECOUUENDArIONSS
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak Lndlcator lights on the sunps.
Surnps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
SoilE around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be saupled for hazardous waste
constituents.
fIMSEIGAIIOf, PLIIIS:
This sunp was reuoved in Septenber 1988.
On 1 October Lg87, the original sunp rras exanined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the sunp was removed from service, the
area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental Engineer.
No leaks or soil discoloration were noted.
NO FT'RTTIER ACTION TS IiIARRANIED.
D. Ir. Covingrton
Environmental EngLneer
9 January 1991
I,NIT IIIIIIBER: 115
UXIE ITOCATION: M-16
IINIA DE8CRIP[fON3 OId Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp received wastewater generated in the
Danufacturing of propellant.
OPERATIONAIT DAAEBT
The system uas installed in Decenber L957 and remainedin service untl.l Septenber 1985 at which tine it was
removed. Current operations in this building do notrequire a hazardous waste sump.
ItlltAGED f,AgrE8!
The wastes contained in this unit were wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUUENDAATONSS
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reuoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIV'EESfGAEIOU PLeNg :
Wtren the sump was reuoved, the area was graded and
covered with asphalt. -\
{r"w. {f.e ;uvnp )
ID. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
I'NIT NI'IiBER3 116
UNII LOCAIION3 U-20
UNME8CRIPiIIONS Hazardous Waste Sump
ThLs sunp receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
steeL reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAEIONAIJ DAEE8:
The origi,nal eystem was installed in Septenber 1958 and
replaced with the current systeu in December 1988.
IIAIIAGED TAgtrESS
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOIII.IENDAAION8 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVESAIGAAIOil PLNTS !
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisFnsalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterials.
On 1 October L987, the original. sump waa examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Tlhen the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloratLon were noted. on
5 Decenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of thLs report.
This unit ueets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tanl< system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION TS I{ARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Enviror:nental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT NI,UBER3 LI7
I,ITIT TJOCATIONZ Iq-22
lrNIE DE8CRIPIfON3 Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAIIIOTIAE DAIDES:
The original system was installed in Septenber 1958 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
ITAITAGED f,As8Eg:
The wastes contaLned Ln thLs unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
exlrlosives.
RFA RECOU}TENDArIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be saupled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVEETIGATION PT,NT8 !
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterials.
On 1 October L987, The original sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Wtlen the old sunp was removed from service,the area was inspected by a trhiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
12 Novenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent prJ,or to being placed into service.Certification of inspection is included as part of thisreport.
lfhis unit ueets the requirements specified in 40 CfR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER AETION IS WARRAIflIED.
D. IJ. Covington
\ Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT NIIITBER: 118
UNTE I,OCAEION: M-23
IrNII DE8CRIPEION3 Old Hazardous Waste Sumo
This sump received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant.
OPERAIIONAIT DAIIEB !
The system vas installed in JuIy 1959 and remained inservice until 1988 at which tine it was removed.Current operations in this building do not require a
hazardous waste sump.
I{IIIAGED f,48|[88:
The wastes contained in this unit were wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:cplosives.
Rra nEcordnEttDAEIoNS :
Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soil,s around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
IIM8BIGATION PfrAltg s
The sump was filled with grravel and capped withconcrete. The trench fron the building to the sump hasalso been plugged with concrete.
NO FT'RTHER AETION IS WARRAIflTED.
D. L. CovLngton
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIT ITI'I{BER3 119
IrNfE IOCAIIONI lq-24
UNII DE8CRIPTIONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp receives wastewater grenerated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIONAIT D1EE83
The original system was install,ed in Septenber 1958 and
replaced with the current system in December 1988.
ITAITAGED TA88E83
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the nanufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUI,IEIIDAAIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sunps whl.ch have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
TNVESEIGEEION PITIITS :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DislnsalInstntctions for llaste ltlateriaJ,s.
On 1 October L987, the original. sump was exanined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrrity by an independentengineer. Iiltren the old sunp was removed from service,
the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
3 December 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection Ls included aspart of this report.
This unit ueets the requirenents specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RTHER, ACTION IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIE NI'UBER! LzO
I,NIS LOCAIIOIIi yl-27
IrNfE DE8CRfPIION: Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is egulpped with
secondary containment and a leak detection systen.
OPERAEIOIIAIT DAEBS:
The original system was installed in June 1959 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
TTANAGED TA88E8S
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the nanufacturing and processing of
e:qrlosives.
BFA RECOUITENDATIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIVESSIGETION PTrIlt8 :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the thlokol manual, DisposalInstntctlons tor Waste lttaterials.
On 1 October L987, the original sump was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. I{hen the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration rrere noted. on
21 Novenber 1988 the new sump hras inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit ueets the requirements specified ln 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RTHER, ACTION TS WARRAI{TED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NTT NI'UBER3 L2L
IrNII LOCAIIONi lq-42
UttIT DE8CRIPTION: Hazardous Waste Sump
This unit consists of two concrete sunps connected in aseries. The inlet for the east tank has been pluggedwith concretei therefore, only the west sump receiveswastewater. The sumps are inspected on a yearly basis
by an independent engineer.
OPERAEIONAIT DAIE83
The existing system was installed as a nehr unit in
November 1981.
}TAISAGED TA8!88!
The wasteE contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges fron the uanufacturing and processl,ng of
explosives.
RFA RECOUUEITDAITONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constl,tuents.
ITwESAIGABION PfreNB s
The procedures for turning off the leak Lndicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Dislpsal
Instntctions for Waste ttlaterials.
llhis sump is inspected on a yearly basis for leaks and
basic tank integrity by an independent engineer. The
nost recent inspection has certified the tank to bestructurally sound and watertight.
This unit neets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265.L9L for an existing tank system.
NO FURTHER AqTTON IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. Covingrton
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIE NI,UBER! L22
IrNIE IJOCArIONS !{-43
UNI|tt DEgeRIPEfONs Elnercrency Containment Sump
This unit serves as an emerEency containment sump on1y.
OPEReffONeIr DA![Egs
The existing system was instalLed in AugruBt 1981.Current operations in the building have not requiredits use, but it remains for emergency containment useonly.
TIAITAGED f,A8TE8 3
This unit does not receive any hazardous wastes. Any
hazardous wastewater generated from operations in thisbuilding is contained in the hazardous waste sump onthe east side of the building.
RFA RECOUIIEIIDAIIIOIIS 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
ItgVEgEIGeIf ON PfrNtg !
This unit does not meet the definition of a SWMU. It is
used as Ebergency Contal,nment in the case of anaccidental spill from a production area and is not usedto manage waste.l
The procedures for turning off the leak ind,icatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DisgnsalInstntctions for Waste ttaterl,als.
NO FI,RTHER ACTION IS WARRAIIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
rRCBA Facility Assessuent Guidance, Oct-86, Pg I-4
I,ITIE NI,UBERS L23
ITIIIE LOCAtrION: It{-56
IrNIr DESCRXPUONs Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp receives wastewater ltenerated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and ls equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIOIIAIT DeIEgt -
llhe original system was installed in March 1960 and
replaced with the current system in December 1988.
ITAITAGED TASTESS
The wastes contained in this unLt are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:qrlosives.
RFA RECOUITEITDATIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all srrmps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
r}IVE8IIGATION PLAITS S
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found ln the Thiokol manual, Dl"saosalInstntctions tor Waste ltlaterLals.
On 18 Septenber 1987, the orlgLnal sunp was exaninedfor leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the o1d sunp was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
17 Decenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed Lntoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit neets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO :rURTHER ACTION TS WARRAI{TED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT NI,UBERs L24
I,NIA LOCAEION2 U-57
IntIT DEBCRIPUON: Elnerqencv Containment Sump
This unit is an emergency containment sump. It uouldonly be used in the case of a spill or to collect
deluge water.
OPERAIIIOIIAII DATEgt
The exact installation date is unknown but it remainsfor emergency containment use only.
IIAITAGED !IA8TE83
Any wastes contained in this unit would be productnaterial from a spill or deluge water.
NFA RECOUI.TENDAAIOTI8 !
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieal< indicator lights on the suups.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVESAIGATIOf, PIJENS:
This unit does not neet the definition of a SWMU. It is
used as emergency containment in the case of an
accidental spill- fron a production area and is not usedto managte waste.'
NO FI,RTHER AqTION IS WARRANTIED.
D. L. Covingrton
Environmental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
2RCRA Facility Assessment Guidance, oct-86, Pg f-4
I,NIE NITITBER: L28
lrNI'I I,OCAAIONS ![-115
IrNIT DE8CRIPIION3 Hazardous ReeirculatLon SumpThis sump receives rrastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is construeted ofsteel reLnforced concrete and ls equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERIAIOIIAL DATE8!
The originaL system was installed in November 1981 and
replaced with the current system in January 1989.
}TAIIAGED f,A8TE8:
Bhe wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:<lrlosives.
NTA RECOUITENDAIIONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reuoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVEETIGA!'ION PT.AI[8 3
trhe procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal
InstntctLons for Waste ltlateriaJ,s.
On 1 October L987, the original sump was exanined for
Ieaks and basl.c tank integrity by an independent
engrineer. When the o1d sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No lealcs or soil discoloration were noted. On
13 February 89 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report. \
lltris unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO I"URTHER ACTION IS WARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIE NI'IIBER: L29
UNI'I ITOCAiIIONS ![-120
IrNIf DE8CRIPBION! Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
nanufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containnent and a leak detection system.
OPERE:IIOIIAI, DAAES:
The original system'was Lnstalled in November 1961 and
replaced with the current system in March 1988.
ltlltAGED rA8[E8s
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processl.ng of
explosives.
RECOUIIENDAIIIONS:Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed Ehould be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IlIlTEgAf GlEf ON PLAltg s
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Bhiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions tor Waste ltaterLals.
Before 12 January 1988, this sunp was examined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. $lhen the old sump was reuoved from service,the area rras inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
3 March 1988 the new sunp was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certiflcation of inspection is included aspart of thiE report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO TI'RTHER AETTON IS WARRNITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NTT f,MIBER! 13O
IINII ITOCAEION. lq-L7 4
IrNIS DE8CRIPUONS South Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. the sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIONAL DAfESt '
The existing system was installed as a new unit in
March L987.
IIAIIAGED f,ABAE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:qrlosives.
RFA NECOUTTEIIDIEIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps whlch have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgrraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
I}IVESTIGATTOI{ PLEITE 3
The procedures for turning off the leak Lndicatorlights are found in the Thiokol uanual, Dispnsal
Instntct,Lons tor Waste ldaterials.
On 3 March L987 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being pJ.ace into service.Certification of inspection Ls included as part of thisreport.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RTTIER ACTION IS WARRA!{TED.
D. L. Covingrton
Envl,ronmental Engineer
9 January 1991
IINIT NUUBERc 131
IrNIT ITOCATfON: M-605
Ir!IIT DESCRIPTION: Nort,h Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wast,ewater generat,ed in the
manufacturing of propeIlant,. The sump is const,ruct,ed offibergtass and is equipped with secondary containment
and a leak deEecEion syst,em
OPERATfOIIAIJ DATES:
The original sysEem was installed in November L962 and
replaced with t,he current sysEem in November 1988.
UEIIAGED ITNITES:
The wast,es contained in this unit are wastewat,er
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
oq>Iosives.
RFA RECODIUEIIDATIOIIS :Establish st,andard procedures for responding t,o theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waEte
constituent,s.
IIIIIESTIGATION PI.TAIIS :
Ttre procedures for turning off the leak indicat,orlight,s are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal
Instructions for Waste lulaterials.
On 9 September 1987, the original sump was examined for
leaks and basic t,ank int,egrity by an independent,engineer. When t,he old sump was removed from sertrice,the area was inspect,ed by a Thiokol Environment,al
Engineer. No leaks or soil discolorat,ion were not,ed. On
3 December 1988 the new sump was inspect,ed by an
Independent Engineer prior t,o being placed intosenrice. Cert,if icat,ion of inspect,ion is included aspart of this report.
This unit meet,s the requirement,s specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FTJRTHER ACTION IS I{ARRAI{TED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
I'NIE NI'UBER: L32
IrNIE ITOCA|IIONS !{-505
IINIS DE8CRIPUON: South Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and ls eguipped with secondary contalnment
and a leak detection system
OPERATIONE! DATES8
The original system was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
ITAITAGED f,A8TEg!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RBA RECOUI{BIIDAAIONS !
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
leak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have
removed.
Soils around all
upgraded should
constituents.
fIfVEStrIGATfON PLAI{8 :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DLsgcsal
Instntctions for Waste lt[aterj,als.
On 9 Septenber L987, the original sump was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Ylhen the old sump was renoved from service,
the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration hrere noted. On
3 December 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being pLaced intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO TURTHER ACTION IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
been abandoned or closed should be
sumps which have been removed and
be sampled for hazardous waste
I,NIE NI,UBER: 133
IrNfE f.,OCAEION: !,t-605
UNr![ DE8CRIPEIONS West Hazardous Waste SumpThis sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and is equipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection system
OPERAIIIONAL DAAES 3 *
The original system was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
ITDITAGED trA TE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing ofexplosives.
RFA RECOUUEIIDEEIONS:Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
INVEETIGATTON PIrII[g :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposalfnstntctions tor Waste ltlaterlals.
On 9 Septeuber 1987, the original sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed fron service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
29 Novenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
Ahis unit meets the reguirements specLfJ.ed in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS IiIARRA}ITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIA NI,UEER: L34
IrNIf LOCAIION3 !,t-605
ITIIIE DE8CRIPEION3 East Hazardous Waste Sumo
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection system
OPERAAfONAIT DAtrEE t
The original system was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
IiIITAGED TA8trE83
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sJ.udges from the manufacturing and processing of
errtrrlosives.
RTA RECOUITENDEEIONS 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Leak indicator J.ights on the sumps.
sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reuoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
I}IVEETIGAETON PLETS S
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal
Instntctions tor Waste ttlaterials.
On 9 Septenber L987, the original sunp was examl,ned for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Wtren the oId sump was removed from service,
the area was inspected by a thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
29 Novenber 1988 the new sunp hras S.nspected by an
Independent Engineer prJ.or to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirenents specifJ.ed in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER AETION IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
I,NII ltUltBERs 135
IrNII I.OCA.|IIONS !{-504
IINIE DESCRIPIIONs North Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives srastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and ls equlpped with secondary containnent
and a leak detection system.
OPERIAIONAIT DeEEg!
The original systeu was installed in Novenber 1962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
I{ANAGED TASTE8!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
e:qrlosives.
RII RECOUTiENDEEIONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around al.l sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampJ.ed for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIVESIIGAIfON Pf.,trltg !
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DLsoosalInstntctions for Waste ttlateriaJ,s.
On 15 Decenber L987, the original sump waE examined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. $lhen the o1d sump sas reuoved from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
11 Novernber 1988 the new sunp was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RAIIER AETION IS WARR;NITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
IntIT NU}TBER: 136
IrNII IrOeellIONs ![-504
UNIT DE8CRIPEIOIIS South Hazardous llaste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
nanufacturing of propellant. The unit consists of 2
sumps constructed of fiberglass and equipped with
secondary containment and leak detection.
OPERIAIONAIT DAEEgt -
The original system was installed in November L962 andreplaced with the current system in November 1988.
}iA}IAGED TA8!TE8S
The wastes contained ln this unit are wastewater
sJ.udges from the manufacturLng and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUI,IEIIDATIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Leak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been renoved and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
I}IVESTIGAAION PLENg:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorIights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions for Waste llaterials.
On 15 December L987, the original sump was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
9 November 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
Thls unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RTTIER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
T'NIT NI'UBERS L37
!n{MOCAEIoN: I.!-519
UNII! DE8CRfPAION! Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed offiberglass and is equipped with secondary contal,nment
and a leak detection system
OPERATIONAE DATE83
The original systeu was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current systen in December 1988.
UANaCED f,egllEgs
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:qrlosives.
RFA RECOUITENDArION8SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator J.lghts on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
SoLls around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIM8IIGAI'ION Pf.eNB!' The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the ThiokoJ. manual, Disposal
InstntctLons fot Waste l{aterials.
on 6 July L987, the original sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Wtlen the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soiL discoloration hrere noted. On
13 December 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS IiIARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
^
Environmental Engineer
t 9 January 1991
I,NI8 NT,UBER: 138
IrNII IJOCAtrION: !{-522
mtlr DE8CRIPIIONs Deactivated llazardous Waste Sump
This unit rras a hazardous waste sump located at M-522.This building has been deactivated, torn $own and
removed. The sump has been deactivated and reuoved frouthe area.
OPERAAIONAI. DAEE83
For a detailed summary of the operational dates, referto the SI{!,!U sunmary tables. The sunp systeu has not
been used for at least 10 years.
}TAITAGED [A8!TE8S
This sunp vas used for containing wastewater sludges
*s*"9':""T:l::_1_"Jsip-s1:::_'::=_:3:: j*t:*.=.
RFA RECOUITEITDAIION8 S
Remove deactivated sumps to avoid acctrmulation ofliguids which may be perceived as hazardous.
IIwEESIGI8IOII PIrAI{8:
This sump was renoved on O7 May 1992. The tank was
inspected by Environmental ltlonitoring Personnel and
found to be in good condition. Soil samples hrere taken
from beneath and around the sunp at the time ofremoval. The results of the analysis are included withthis report.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS IiIARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
19 May 1992
A5/ LL/ L332 14: 37
a
8ts1 4oou / bJ FIJR"U ANALY III-,AL LAl1 tsA\ra A4
CHEMICAI, AAID BACGRIOLOGICAT ANALYSIS
Sur,rfiAu^
#"tet
TIrloI(oL, rNc.t PAT,L HA}{CGI(
BOX 689 ttl8 301
BRIGITN,I CTY, t'T 8{302
EAl,tPLEr EOIL SA}|PLES COLLECTED 3-7-92, 13,30 HRE BI
UORTH RECEIVED 5-8-92 POR UOLATILE ONGAilICS
ETANIING AT { P.I,T.
l{-522 t{-522ST,HP BICK-
GBOT'IID
I' EPA T,IEtIIOD SOZL
1r 1 Dlchloroethane ppb
1, 1, 1, Z-Tetrachloroethane ppb
|1
, 2, z-fct rachloroethene ppb
f,r, Z-Trlchloroethane ppb
1, 1 -Dlchloroethylene ppb
1, l-Dtchloropropene ppb
L, 2, 3-Trtchloropropane ppb
L, 2, 3-Trtchlorob€nzene ppb
L, 2, l-Trtchlorobenzene ppb
L, 2, {-Trtnethylbenzene ppb
L, 2-Dtbrono-3-chloroprop. ppb
L, 2-Dlbromoethane ( EDB I ppb
L, Z-Dlchloroethane ppb
L, 2-D lchloropropane ppb
1, 3, S-Trtnethylbenzene ppb
o
<3 .75
<3.75
<3 .73
<3.75
<3.75
<3 .73
<3.75
<3 .75
<3 .73
<3.75
<3 .75
<3.75
<3.75
<3 .73
<3.75
<2.7L
<2.71
<2. ?1
<2.7L
<2,7L
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.7L
<2.71
<2.7L
l[ ,.po,la ar ]finlaal r ilr coilldrnlit Do9rr, ol cLnl& AlhcErEl |il FalGlffla ol a, ,tcorE aooctlro[. or. rrlncll ,rom a t grrfitg ill'n.
irrI.Urarilne qrurm rF,onl urrmualo.ol6irrECr,|t!. uc guuic lrd orrndyaa.
DAfiff"[?]'ftgyuYsrs
92-eOO737
JEPF'HOLLINGS-
ANALYEIs
40 WEsr Louise Awnuc , Soh Loke Clfy. Uioh E4115 . P|{ONE (tO1) 466-E761 . FAX (801 46&8763
\).)a -Ai LJJL .-.:ra
I
LJLr-'tti,UL, I !,,\., I gl\a/ Ftlll-tL-. I t\JFll- l-Flu f- nr2E- (Jr/
CHEMICA Ar.lD BACTERIOLOGICAT ANALYSIS
Pfdgil"of oF
^N^rYsrs
92-000737
l{-522
SUHP
lf-522
BACI(-
GNOI'ND
1, 3-Dlchloropropane ppb
111 -Trlchloroethane ppb
2, 2, Dlch loropropane ppb
Benzene ppb
Bromobenzene ppb
Bronochloromethane ppb
Bronodlchloromethane ppb
Iliroforn ppb
--ttnonethane ppb
Chlorobenzone ppb
Chloroethane ppb
chloroforn ppb
Chloromethane ppb
Dlbronochloronethane ppb
Dtbronomethane pBb
Dlchlorodlf luoromethane ppb
Dtchloromethane ppb
tsthylbenzene ppb
Fluorot rtchloronethane ppb
<3.75
<3 .75
<3.75
<3.75
<3.75
<3 .75
<3,75
<3.75
<3 .75
<3.75
<3.75
<3.75
<3.75
<3 .?5
<3 .73
<3.?3
<3 .75
<3.75
<3.75
<2.7L
<2.71
<2.?L
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.7L
<2.71
<2.71
<2,7L
<2.71
<2,71
<2.71
<2,71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
Al I|9oiE m runi.d r rh. coil(rllLl ,rEe.rl, d dmr" &drturrm tr put*qut ol or 'lE E, conclntc!!. c. !ffrcr ltor a rterdng l]icn.
L lllr.vE Frfie cr iila.r rpfatl aa r mruC glucSr I clrtE 0r 9u!Ic gU nrcrhle
40 W.rt LouEe Avenue . Soll tole Clly, t loh 84115 . PrcNE (801) 466476r . FfO( (801) 4668763
03t LLI Laaz
t
CHEIVIICAL A ID BACTERIOLOGICAT Al,lALYSlS
Ptrfirlt,of oF Ar{ALY$s
92-OOO737
l{-522
gTDIP
I{-522
BACI(-
GROtnID
Hexachlorobutadlene ppb
Naphthalenc ppb
Styrene ppb
Tetrachloroethene ppb
Toluene ppb
Trlchloroethylene ppb
Vtny'I Chlortde ppb
ilIr:lhloroethylene PPb
c 1E- 1, 3-Dtchloropropene ppD
tao-Propylbenzene ppb
mrDlchlorobenzene ppb
n-Butylbenzene gpb
n'Propylbenzene ppb
o-Chlorotoluene ppb
o-Dlchlorobenzene ppb
p-Chlorotoluene ppb
p-Dlchlorobenzenc ppb
p- Isopropylt o luene ppb
<3 .75
<3 .75
<3 .75
<3,'/,3
<3.75
<3 .75
<3.75
<3 .75
<3.75
<3 .75
<3 .75
<3 ,75
<3 .75
<3 .73
<3.75
<3.75
<3.75
<3 .75
<3.75
<2.71
<2.7L
<2,7L
<2.71
<2.7L
<2,7L
<2.7L
<2,7L
<2.?L
<2.7L
<2.7L
<2.7L
<2,71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
<2.71
ll.trlr .rt flt;natld r! |llr Erllo'trtrl Frurty ol chlrl. Al[uiaUr E prdcua d ar ,?cb. aErnmG c. ErrEE Iro,i c r.Cffifal ln.ilr.
lrnnr0prtrng arrintrFoud lrrnudCrorut Eclrtr.mOtlltc ]i qilfly.f,
40 Wect Loulsc Avcnue . Solt Loke Clty, t tqh E4115 . PHONE (60! a55.6761 . FA( (801) 466.-8763
g,5/ II/ LSA4 Lq: S {
t
tsEr 4btru / b5
Eec-Butylbenzene ppb
tert-Butylbenzene ppb
t rans- L, Z-Dtchlorocthene pBb
t rana- 1, 3-Dlchloropropen€ ppb
r URU ANALY i rr-NU LAE
tf- 522
BACK-
GNOI.'ND
tII
<2.71
<2,7L
<2,7L
<2.71
PAGE A7
cHEMtCAt aruD BACIEnOLOG|CAL Ar\JAtySlS
Pf6u,,r,or oF
^r{ALYsrs
92-eeeT37
tf,-522
8T,HP
IIIIIII'T
<3.75
<3.75
<3.75
<3.75
LABORBTORIEB
Al nCoi3 llt r.tlttilll.. lh. conftLriaa Flpil, oa cIrE. Afiaidin la gdElor d q, rtgau. cgrlurut. 0|r, drA3 rrqtr o r.gatl.rg th..tr.
i3 rarr,5 pand.? il rriLn t9o Eual ! r tuia 9llldoo lo Cltttt lrC F&E ltf ourtr}cr,
40 Wcri Louirc Avcnuc . Sotl Lokc CiV, Uttth 841{5 . PI{ONE (801 466-8761 . FAX (601) 466.E763
CHEMICAL AID BrcTERIOLOGICA AT\ATYSIS
CEPIIFICAIE OF ANATYSIS
DATE r e5/11 192
THIOKOL, TNC.t PAT'L HTNCOCK
BOX 689 ltl8 301
BRIGEAI,I CTI,tI 843e2
SAtlPLEr EofL EAilPLEg Ftrll{ A-522 coIIEeTED 5-7-92,
BY JETP HOI.LINGST{OHTH RECEIVED 5-8.92 POR
STARIING Af 3 r 35 P.l{. t I{DER FO 12GH066,
92-0241gg
13 r 30 HOURE
I.TETALA. AI.IALYSIE
lf-522 l{- 322ETIT.IP BACK-
GrcI.ND
Argenlc Ae ppn EPA 601 O
Bertum Ba ppn EPA 6010
CaclmLun Cd ppm EPA 6010
Chroiillun Cr Dpn EPA 6OLO
f. Pb rrpm EPA 6010
I{ercury Hg ppm EPA 1470
Perchloratg ppm FAL zLO
8a1en1un Se ppm BPA 5O1O
Sllver Ag ppn EPA 5010
9.293
55 .57
2.780
2e .919
62.465
. oogl
<1 .79
<.960
.1{8
IIII..'I'
9.523
86, 06
1 .300
10. {85
15 .331
.0247
<2.75
<1 -O2g
,222
At rl9otu ril g&trliao .| tnt Contt,ftfial omtry d dl.'lr. AlUprErlin lil ouurur d qr nForu. co|Elurlollr, or. .Iractt l.qn or r.g[rdrE thf,n.
is rurvrd pg$ll ouilifx aflorl| I rtirual pru6orr Edra0l3. ha grtlc arrt outalvi3.
40 W6st Louise Avenue , Solt Loke Cily, Ubh Ml15 . PI'ONE tEOl) 4&-8761 . FAX [phone]
CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL AI.IALYSIS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE I O5/L3/92
THIOKOL, INC.
T PAUL HANCOCK
BOX 589 M/ S 301 92-0242L4
BRIGHAM CTY,UT 84302
SAMPLE: SoIL SAMPLE FROM 14-522 SLJMP COLLECTED 5-1-92, 1Q.:3@ HOURS
BY JEFF HOLLINGSWORTH RECEIVED 5.LL-92 FOR ANALYSIS USING
TCLP PROCEDURE TJNDER PO #2GH055.
RESUTTS
. TCLP METALS EPA 1311
Chromlum Cr ppm EPA 6OL@
Lead Pb ppm EPA 6ALO
<.olo
.o@4
All ,eporls arB submfied as tm conli&nli8l property ol dbnts. Arthdizaton lor puuicdon ol our repo,ls, conclusons. or. eilrads lrom or regardrng them.
is rssaved pendi4 our wdtlen apgovd 83 a mutual protscton h clEnB. lhe public and ou'selws.
40 West Louise Avenue . Solt Loke City, Utoh 84115 . PHONE [phone] . FAX [phone]
CONCLUSION OF SOTL SAIIIPLING AT U-52O AI.ID U-522 SI'!{P REIIOVAL
These two sumps are on the East side of the buildings. Thebuildings are located next to each other. One back-ground sample
was taken between the sumps because of their close proxinity to
each other. !,t-520 showed higher levels of chromium-than the backgtround. Because of this a TCI;P test for chromiresults were .O15 ppmr which is well below thelevel for chromium.
baclc
were
the
U-522 showed higher levels of both chromium
ground. A TCLP procedure was done on these mefor chromium: <.010 and lead was .0O4. Both
regrulatory levels for these metals.
No volatile organic compounds were detected.
NJcl Anatly-Lit^)ffsq,, [*s {.r C\ {}4 dC (x p$*u tun&
Cr^fl,{,Pd}r,nq'[ :wfit*"L^o a-ry-, +t^& n-t*lst l"r ("#Cr** qlce,.
SOTL SAIIIPLING PI,AT{
THIOKOL CORPORATION
PO BOX 689
84 3 02-0689
L7 January L992
PARED BYJ
D. L. COVINGTON
EINruRONI,IENTAL ENGINEERTNG
oL
o2
o3
o4
SOIIr SAIIPITfNG PITAII
ST]IIIP REMOVAL
M-520 AND I{-522
SAIIPLE I,OCATION, DESCRIPTION
Sump removal at both M-52O and M-522
SlltPIrE OB.TECIIVE
Characterize the soil to detetmine if any contamination
has occured.
SlltPIrIltG EQUIPUEITT
. Certified clean glass sample bottles with teflonIiner, 3-4 ozt 0r 4-8 oz.. Rubber gloves. Measuring tape. Bound field book. Spade, scoop or trowel. Coo1er, and ice. Tap water. Alconox soap. Distilled water
SaUPLING PROCEDURE8
Three samples will be taken using the soil sampling p1an.
One sample will be taken in the center of the
contaninated area or in the center of where the strnp waslocated at a depth of approxinately 8 inches to 1 foot.
Note the location of this sanple in reference to a fixedpoint and record the information in the log book. Takethe second sample in an area of lighter contamination
down gradient fron the first at a depth of 8 inches to 1foot or approxinately 2 feet from the first. Note thelocation of this sarnple in reference to the first.
Clean the spade of trowel prior to sampling and between
samples as follows: wash with detergent water, followed
by tap water and then distilled water.
The samples must be refrigerated or kept on ice prior to
analyses. The samples need to sent to a lab as quicklyas possible and be analysed within 14 days ofcollection.
05
o5
SlltPf.E DOCITIIEIIIATION
The following infotmation must be recorded in a boundfield book:
. Date and tiure of sanpling. samplers name and signature. Location of samples including depth
Weather information
Texture and color of sample
Any other pertinent information
AIIAIJYTICAIJ PARIITETERS
PARJNIETER
Vo1atile Organis, Total
Cadmium, Total
Lead, TotalSilver, total
Mercury, total
Chromium, total
METHOD
EPA Method - 8240
SWB46 Method - 7L3O
SW846 Method - 7420
SW846 Method - 7750
SI{8 46 Method - 7 47 O
SW846 Method - 7L90
CONCLUSION OF SOIL SAI{PLING AT },I-520 AI{D I{-522 SIn{P REI{OVAL
These two sumps are on the East side of the buildings. Thebuildings are located next to each other. one back-ground sample
was taken between the sumps because of their close proxinity to
each other. yl-520 showed higher levels of chromium than the background. Because of this a TCLP test for chromium tras done. Theresults were .015 ppm, which is well below the 5 ppn regulatorylevel for chromium.yt-522 showed higher levels of both chromium and lead than the
back ground. A TCLP procedure was done on these metals. The results
hrere for chromirrm: <.010 and lead was .004. Both hlere well belowthe regulatory levels for these metals.
No volatile organic compounds were detected.
I'NI[ NT'UBER: 139
IrNfT LOCATfON: l[-85
IrNII DE8CRfPIION: Inactive or Deaetivated Hazardous Waste Sump
This unit consists of a hazardous waste sump located ata building which has been deactivated or po longergenerates hazardous waste flons reguiring a containmentsump. This sump was taken out of service prior to
1988.
OPERAEIONAIJ DA![88 3
Operation dates vary for each of the sumps. For adetailed summary of the operational dates, refer to the
SWUU sunmary tables.
ITAIIAGED f,A8TE83
This sump was used in the past for containing
wastewater sludges frou the manufacturing andprocessing of e:qrlosives.
RFA BECOTII{EIIDArIONS !
Remove sumps to avoid accumulation of liquids which may
be perceived as hazardous.
INVESAIGATIOIT PI,AITS :
An evaluation of this sump will be made to determine ifthe possibility exists that the building will require
containment for hazardous wastes in the future. If the
sump does not meet the requirements for a tank system
as specified in 40 CFR 265 the sump wiII physically be
removed and the site investigated according to the
sampling plan titled Soil Investl.gatl-on Procedures
Following Sump Removal.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 December 1991
lrltl! NITIT|BER! 140
IrNIf ITOCAAION: M-590
IrNII DE8CRIPEION: North Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
fiberglass and is equipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection systeu.
OPERESTONAL DAEE83
The origl.nal systeu was installed in Noveuber L962 and
replaced with the current system Ln November 1988.
ltAltAGED re"g!!Es3
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
erqrlosives.
RFn RECOUI[EltDl![IOltg tEstablish standard procedureE for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all surnps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESTIGAAIOT PLllTS:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntetLons for Waste ltlaterials.
On 9 Septenber 1987, the original sump was examined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. $lhen the o1d sump was renoved from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
14 Novenber 1988 the new sunp was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO TURTHER ACTTON IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIT NI'UBER3 141
uNIr LOCAtrION3 !,t-590
IrNIA DE8CBIPIION3 South Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
fiberglass and is equipped wlth secondary containment' and a leak detection sYstem
OPERATIONIIT DlrEg:
The original system was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
IIAITAGED TA8TE83
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RTA RECOUUENDAIIONS:Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps whlch have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Sol,ls around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIwE8IIGAAIOf, Plrll[8 :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the [hiokol nanual, DisposalInstntetions for Waste llaterials.
On 9 Septenber 1987, the original sump was examined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed frou service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environnental
Engrineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
14 Novenber 1988 the new sump uas inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoserqice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit neets the reqrirements specified ln 40.CFR.
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
'o I'NTT NT'UBER:L42
IINIS LOCITEION: !{-52O
IrltfT DEBCRfPTfON3 Deactivated Hazardous Waste Sumo
This unit hras a hazardous waste sump located at !t-52o.This building has been deactivated, torn flown and
removed. The sump has been deactivated and removed fromthe area.
OPEREEIONAIJ DATE83
For a detailed summary of the operational dates, referto the SWMU summary tables. The sump systeu has not
been used for at least 10 years.
TTAITAGED TA8TE8!
This sump was used for containing wastewater sludges
from the manufacturing and processing of errplosives.
RFA RECOUUETIDATIONS:
Remove deactivated sumps to avoid accumulation ofliquids which may be perceived as hazardous.
r}IVE8ITGATION PI,}}{S :
This sump was removed on 05 May L992. The tank was
Environmental Monitoring Personnel andin good condition. Soil samples were taken
and around the sump at the time ofreuoval. The results of the anaIys5.s are included withthis report.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
19 May L992
inspected by
found to be
from beneath
CHEMICAL AAID BACTERIOLOGICAI. AAIAI.ISIS
THTOKOL, rNC.
t JEFF HOLLINGSWORTH
BOX 589 I'{/ S 301
BRIGHAI'I CTY, UT 84302
- EPA METHOD 8O2L
1, 1 Dlchloroethane ppb
1, 1, L, 2-Tet rachloroethane ppb
1, 1 ,2,Z-Tet rachloroethane ppb
1 . 1 ,2-Trlchloroethane ppb
.,
1, 1 -Dlchloropropene ppb
L ,2, 3-Trlchloropropane ppb
L, 2, 3-Trtchlorobenzene ppb
L, 2, A-Trlchlorobenzene ppb
L, 2, 4-Trlmethylbenzene ppb
L, 2-Dlbromo- 3-chloroprop . ppb
L, 2-Dlbromoethane ( EDB ) ppb
L, Z-Dlchloroethane ppb
!, Z-Dtchloropropane ppb
1, 3, S-Trlmethylbenzene ppb
1, 3-Dlchloropropane ppb
swvrrt^ *tqz
<4,0O
<4.O4
<4.OA
<4.OO
<4.OA
<4 .OO
<4.OO
<4,OO
<4.OO
<4.OO
<4.OA
.''
4.AO
<4.OO
.<4.OO
<4.OO
<4,OO
CERTIFICATE OF AI{/ALYSE
DATE z O5 l08/9?
92-OOO7 L7
.l-,
SAMPLEIr SOIL SAI,iPLE FROM l4-52O COLLECTED 5-6-92, 5130 Al.r-By DAVE
COVINGTON RECEIVED 5-6-92 FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
ON RUSH BASIS TJNDER PO T2GIIO55.
RESULTS
Af rlpqt3 an ctiilld u lta ddtrtiJ Flearty d drrE. AdtaLaliol E pntlirtm ol ur ttgolB. co.dt3ffi. a. ormdi lrom d rcgadrnE ltnlr.
L tGfYrl FrrI[ qI urirr aFovd .l r mig Ard@r lo ctxt!. h3 gltatc .d ou$lrrcs.
40 West Louise Averue . Soll Loke Clly, tltoh 84115 . PI{ONE (801 466-8761 . FA( [phone]
CHEMICAL AND BACIERIOLOGICAT AT{AI.YSIS
CERTIFICATE OF AT.IALYSE
DATE t 05/ 08/92
THIOKOL, INC.
T JEFF HOLLINGSWORSH
BOX 689 t[/S 301 92-O24t36
BRTGHAM CTy, UT 84302
-
SAMPLET SOIL SMPLE FROM I.{-520 COLLECTED 5-5-92, 6130 AM BY DAVE
COVINGTON RECEIVED 5-6-92 FOR ANALYSIS ON RUSH BASTS UNDER
PO S2GH055.
RESULTS
Arsenlc As ppm EPA 6OLA
Bartum Ba ppm EPA 6,OLA
Cadmlum Cd ppm EPA 6OLO
Chromlum Cr ppm EPA 6OLO
O
Pb ppm EPA 6010
Mercury Hg ppm EPA 7470
Perchlorate ppm FAL 2lO
Selenlum Se ppm EPA 6OLO
Stlver Ag ppm EPA 6OLO
<.609
90.23
<.o59
15 . 4LO
<oo57
' . 0LLO
<1 .88
<.936
<.o23
FORD ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES
Af rFEanrtrilLdt30rcoffmirlFWilyddantr tulrtirrtlobpuuatbr0lqrn9ffi, comfriru. c. utncBfunatlgarfitghcm.i n f,ud pmfrg qI lrilf| fFovd a. mtd gdmn h.trlla llc poaE.r! qrrd,sl
r1,1 lllacl larrica Arraarra . Cala I aLa Fll, l*al OtalC . l'ttl^rlr .o6a\ Att 6at.
CHEMICAT AND BACTE RIOLOGICAI. ATIAIYSIS
CERTIFICATE OF AI{/ALYSIS
DATE t g5/99/92
THIOKOL, INC.Z JEFF HOLLINGSWORTH
BOX 689 M/S 30L 92-g24L8L
BRIGHAM CTY,UT 84392
SAMPLET SOIL SAMPLE M-52g COLLECTED 5-6-92 BY DAVE COVINGTON
RECEIVED 5-8-92 FOR ANALYSIS USING TCLP PROCEDURE UNDER
PO *2GHg66
RESULTS
rI- II"I'I'-
TCLP METALS EPA 1511
CxeoMrur'f CR PPM EPA 6gLA .gls
Af rlpdB al! sttitLd e! Ut Gonlid.nlid Fogrty 0l clanE. Arllrdraim br puUi:tcr ol u rtporls. oorrllsins. d. rrtlacts tom d rcgarong them.
i3 ttsft..t p.lllE qrudlan rmoyC atamfidpll[lc0orbdbils" fi. gullc snl ou,sslrrts.
FORD ANALYTICAL LABORATOR I ES
40 Wesl Louise Avenue . Soll Loke Clty, utoh 84115 . PI{ONE [phone] . Fr0( [phone]
CONCLUSION OF SOIL SAII{PLING AT I{-520 A}{D !,T-522 STMP REMOVAL
These two sumps are on the East side of the buildings. Thebuildings are located next to each other. One back-ground sample
was taken between the sumps because of their close proxinity to
each other. l,t-520 showed higher leveIs of chromium than the background. Because of this a TCLP test for chromj.um Was done. Theresults were .015 ppm, which is well below the 5 ppn regulatorylevel for chronium.yl-522 showed higher levels of both chromium and lead than the
back ground. A TCLP procedure was done on these metals. The results
were for chromium: <.010 and lead was .004. Both were weII belowthe regulatory levels for these netals.
No volatile organic compounds were detected.
SOIL SAUPLING PL,AN
THIOKOL CORPORATION
PO BOX 689
84 3 02-0689
L7 January L992
,REPARED BY:
D. L. COVINGTON
EN\IIRONIIENTAL ENGINEERING
oL
o2
o3
o4
SOIIr SAIiPITING PITAII
S[,UP RE},IOVAL
M-520 AI.ID I{-522
SAI,iPLE LOCATION, DEBCRIPTION
Sump removal at both M-52O and M-522
SAIPITE OBITECTI\IE
CharacterLze the soil to determine if any contamination
has occured.
SllPrrrttc EQUIPUENT
Certified clean glass sample bottles with teflonIiner, 3-4 oz, 0r 4-8 oz.
Rubber gloves
Measuring tape
Bound field book
Spade, scoop or trowel
Cooler, and ice
Tap water
Alconox soapDistilled water
SAltPLIltG PROCEDURE8
Three samples will be taken using the soil sanpling plan.
One sample will be taken in the center of the
contaninated area or in the center of where the sump was
located at a depth of approximately 8 inches to 1 foot.
Note the location of this sample in reference to a fixedpoint and record the infomation in the log book. Takethe second sample in an area of lighter contamination
down gradient from the first at a depth of 8 inches to 1foot or approximately 2 feet from the first. Note thelocation of this sample in reference to the first.
Clean the spade of trowel prior to sampling and between
samples as follows: wash with detergent water, followed
by tap water and then distilled water.
The samples must be refrigerated or kept on ice prior to
analyses. The samples need to sent to a lab as quicklyas possible and be analysed within L4 days ofcollection.
o5
o5
EIIIPI,E DOCI'UEIITIIIOT
The following information nust be recorded in a boundfield book:
. Date and tine of sampling. Samplers name and signature. Locltion of samples including depth..
Weather information
Texture and color of sample
Any other'pertinent infomation
AIIAIJYTICAI, PARAI.TETERS
PARJLIIIETER
Vo1atile Organis, Total
Cadmium, Total
Lead, Tota1Silver, total
Mercur1r, total
Chromium, total
It[ETHOD
EPA Method - 8240
SW846 Method - 7L30
SW846 Method - 7420
SW846 Method - 7750
SW846 Method - 7470
SWB 46 Method - 7L90
CONCLUSION OT SOII. SN,IPLTNG AT I.T-520 Al{D I,T-522 SI'UP REIIOVAII
These two sunps are on the East side of the buildings. Thebuildings are located next to each other. one back-ground sanple
sras taken between the sumps because of their close proxirnity to
each other. ltl-sz0 showed higher levels of chromium than the backgrround. Because of this a TCLP test for chromium was done. Theresults rf,ere .015 ppm, which is well below the 5 ppu regnrlatorylevel for chromium.
Itl-522 showed higher leveIs of both chromium and lead than the
back ground. A TCLP procedure was done on these metals. Tbe results
rdere for chromirrm: <.010 and lead was .004. Both were well belowthe regnrlatory levels for these netals.
No volatile organic compounds were detected.
I'NIT NI'UBEBS 143
IINII ITOCAEIOI|S I-I-521
UIIIII DE8CRIPIIOI{3 Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated
manufacturing of propellant. trhe sump isfiberglass and is equipped with secondary
and a leak detection syst€D.
in the
constructed of
containment
OPERAIIIOIIAIT DAtrEgs
The original systeu was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
ITAITAGED TA8TE83
The wastes contained in this unit are waEtewater
sLudges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFE RECOUUENDAAIONS!Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator llghts on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed shouLd be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
III.ESIGATION PfreNg 3
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disppsal
InstnzctLons for Waste ltlaterials.
On 6 JuIy L987, the original sunp was examined forleaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Iilhen the old sump vas reuoved, from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil dl,scoloration were noted. on
23 November 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
fndependent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRAI{TED.
D. L. Covington
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIE ITT'UBENS L44
IrNIA LoCAIIONS ![-523
IrltIE DE8CRIPAIONT South Hazardous Waste Sumo
ThiE sump receives wastewater generated ln the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection system.
OPERABIONAIT DAtrES:
The original
replaced with
TIATIAGED TA8trE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturLng and processing of
er<plosives.
RFI BECOU}IENDEAIONS:Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
SoLls around all sunps whl,ch have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
I}IVESrIGAEION PI,ATIS :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DjsposalInstntctions for Waste ltlateriaJ,s.
On 1O July L987, the original sunp was examined forleaks and basic tank integrJ.ty by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
30 Septenber 1988 the new sunp was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit neets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER A TION IS WARRANIED.
D. Ir. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
system was installed in November L962 andthe current system in September 1988.
I'I{IE NT'UBER! 145
IrNIS ITOCAEfON3 !{-201
IrNIE DEgCRfPIIot{s Hazardous Waste SumpThis sump receives wastewater generated in the
nanufacturing of propellant. the sunp is constructed offiberglass and is equipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection system.
OPERATIONAIr DATEgt
The original system was install,ed in August 1954 and
replaced with the current systeu in December 1988.
ITAITAGED TA8!!883
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges fron the manufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
RFI RECOU}IEITDATIONE 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
ITVESIIGAIIIOI{ PI,AITS :
The procedures for turning off the lealc indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DisposalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterials.
On 18 Septernber L987, the original sunp was examinedfor leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Wtlen the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
3 December 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to belng placed intoEervice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO TT'RTHER ACTTON IS WARRAIflTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT ITI,UBER3 L46
IrNIf ITOCAIIONS It[-208
I,NII DE8CRIPUON: Emergencv Containment Sump
This unit is no longer connected to the building. The
sump collects only rain water at this time.
OPERAETONAE DAITES:
The existing system was installed in Augu.st 1964.
Current operations in the building have not reguiredits use, but it remains for euergency containment use
only.
IITAIIACED f,AglE8t
The wastes contained in this unit in the past have been
wastewater sludges from the nanufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
Rra BECOUIIEIIDaETONS:Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESTIGEiIION PI,Eilg S
This unit does not meet the definition of a Sl9![U. It is
used as emergency containment in the case of anaccidental spill- from a production area and is not usedto manage waste.'
On 21 iluly L987, this sump was examined for leaks andbasic tank integrity by an independent engineer. The
tank was found to be structurally sound and appeared to
be water tight.
NO FI,RTHER A TTON IS WARRAIiITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
h,cna Facility Assessment Guidance, oct-86, Pg T-4
I'NIE ITTIIIBER: L47
I,NIE LOCAAIONz lil-209
IrNIf DE8CRIPIfON: Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPBRAIIOIIAII DAEES:
The original system was installed in Augrust L964 and
replaced with the current system in December 1988.
ITAITAGED TA88E8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
oqrlosives.
RFA RECoUIIENDelffoNg !
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESrIGA.|IION PI.IITS :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, Distrnsal
rnstntctLons for Waste tlaterials.
on 21 Aug 1987, the original sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. $lhen the old sunp was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
17 Decenber 1988 the new suup was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit ueets the reguirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO I"T'RTHER ACTION TS WARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
I'NI8 I{T'I{BER: 148
UIIIE LOCArfONS !{-210
Irilff DB8CRIPTION: Hazardous Waste SunpThis sump receives wastewater generated in thenanufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with' secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIOIIAIJ DATE83
The original system was instalLed in Augrust t964 andreplaced with the current system in December 1988.
IItrITAGED TASTEB:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
RFI RECOUUETTDAEIONE:Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
ITWESiIIGAIIION PTJANS!
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DLstr:p.salInstntctions tor Waste t[aterLals.
On 21 August L987, the original sunp was examined forleaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed from servi.ce,the area was inspected by a Thiokol, Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On3 December 1988 the new sunp was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRNITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NI8 NT,UBER: L49
IINII ITOCAIfONS !{-2L2
I,NIA DESCRIPIIONS Old North Hazardous waste sump
This unit received wastewater generated in the
. manufacturing of propellant.
OPERAUONaL DAIIES: ..
The systen was installed in August 1964 and renained inservice until November 1988 at which tine it was
removed.
TTAITAGED TA8![883
Bhe wastes contained in this unit were wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
BFA RECOUIIENDATIOITE T
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded shouLd be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVEErIGATION PTIAtt8 S
On 21 August L987, this sump was examined for leaks and
basic tank integrity by an independent engineer. I{henthe sump was removed from service, the area was
inspected by a Thiokol Environmental Engineer. No leaksor soil discoloration were noted.
NO FI'RTHER AqTION IS WARRAMIED.
D. L. Covington
Environuental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NItr
I'NI8
I'NTT
NI,UBER: 150
LOCATION: M-2L2
DESCRIPTION: OId South Ilazardous Waste Sump
This unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant.
OPERATIOIIAIT DAIES:
The system was installed in
service until November 1988
removed.
ITATIAGED IIASTEE:
Augnst Lg64 ""a remainedat which time it was
a1n
The wastes contained in this unit were wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
errplosives.
Rta RECOUIIEIIDArIONS:
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Leak indicator lights on the sump6.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVESrIGAIIION PIflI{S:
On 21 Augrust 1987, this sump was examined for leaks and
basic tank integrity by an independent engineer. Whenthe sump was removed from service, the area was
inspected by a Thiokol Environuental Engineer. No leaksor soil discoloration were noted.
NO FT'RTHER, ACTION IS WARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
o I'NTT NI'UBER3 151
I,NIE I,OCAIION. YI-2L4
IrlIIS DESCRTPIIONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The strmp is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with' secondary containnent and a leak detection system.
OPERATIONBI' DAEEBT
The original system was installed in August L964 and
replaced with the current systen in December 1988.
UENAGED rl8TE8 3
The vastes contained in thls unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
o<plosives.
RfA RECOldI.tEllDA'|[f ONg sEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IM8AIGA'rION PIrDltB:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal
InstntctLons for Waste ltlaterials.
On 18 Septenber 1987, the original sunp was exaDinedfor leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. l{hen the old sunp was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
EngLneer. No leaks or soil discoloration hrere noted. on
27 December 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
fndependent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is incl.uded aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO I'URSTIER ACTION TS WARRAIflTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,ITIE NTII{BER: L52
uNIr rroc:aaloNs u-218
UilIA DE8CRIPIIOf,S Hazardous Waste SumpThis sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERIAIONAIT DATE83
The original systen was installed in Septenber 1968 andreplaced with the current system in Decenber 1988.
TTAITAGED TASEESS
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
RFA BECOUUENDATIONSsEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
SoLls around all sumps which have been renoved and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIVESETGAIIOI{ PIiNS:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Bhiokol nanual, DisposalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterials .
On 21 August L98?, the original sunp was examined forleaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Wtlen the old sump was reDoved from service,the area was inspeeted by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted.
on 6 April 1988 the new sunp was Lnspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certlfication of inspection is included aspart of this report.
Thls unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION TS WARRANTED.
D. Ir. Covington
Environnental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
I'NI8 NT'I{BER3 153
I,NTE LOCAtrION: ItT-528
ITIIIE DE8CRIPTIONS Hazardous Waste SumoThis sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and is equipped wlth secondary contal,nnent
and a leak detection system.
OPERAIIONAL DAIE8 t
The original system was installed in November L962 and
rep}aced with the current system in November 1988.
IIAITAGED TAsTE8!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
NTA RECOUUEITDAEION8 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the suups.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
ITTVESTIGAIION PIfiIT8:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DispnsalInstntctions tor Waste ltlaterials.
On 1O JuIy L987, the original sunp was examined forleaks and basic tank integrlty by an independentengrineer. When the old sump uas removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoLoration lrere noted. On
30 November 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'R$IER AETION IS WARRA}flTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
T,NTT NI,UBER: L54
IINII ITOCATION: ![-588
UNIlf DE8CRIPTION: Etnercrencv Containment Sump
fhis unit serves as an emergency containment sump for aproduct solvent storage area.
OPER1AIONAIT DAIES!
The existlng systeu was installed in March 1960.
IttttAcED rA8rE8!
This unit is not used in the management of wastes, but
as emergency containment for product solvents.
RFE RECOUI,TENDAIIIOII8:
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
leak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVESETGE.|IION PIJAITS S
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found ln the Thiokol manual, Displo,salInstntetions for llaste MaterLals.
This unit does not meet the definition of a SIilMU. It is
used as emergency containuent in the case of an
accidental spill frou a productLon area and is not usedto nanage waste.a
NO rI''RTIIER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
EnvironmentaL Engineer
9 January 1991
h,cne Facility Assessnent Guidance, oct 86, p9 I-4
I,NI8 ITT,UBER3 155
t NrE LOCAIION3 !,t-34
I'NIII DESCRIPTION3 HAZATdOUS WASTE SUMP
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
steel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERIEIOIIAIT DelE83
The original system was installed in December 1959 and
replaced with the current system in September 1988.
ITAIIACED TA8llE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
e:qrlosives.
RtrA RECOUITENDEIION8:Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been renoved and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIwEBTIGATION PfrAlt8 s
The procedures for turning off the leak indicator
lights are found in the Thiokol uanual, DiswsalInstntctions for Waste ttlaterials.
On 1 October L987, the original sunp was examined for
Iealcs and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environuental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration hrere noted. On
28 Septenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 cFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER, ACTION IS WARRANSED.
D. L. Covingrton
Envl,ronmental EngS.neer
9 January 1991
I,NrI ln UBERs 156
UXrf LoqAEIONS M-693
IINIE DE8CRIPUON3 Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated
uanufacturing of propellant. The sump isfiberglass and is eguipped with secondary
and a leak detection system.
OPENAETONAL DA![ES:
The original system was instaLled in February 1981 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
IIAITAGED TASi[E8!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOTOIETIDATIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps whlch have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
SoiLs around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESATGAAIOT PI..AITs :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorIights are found in the Thiokol rnanual, DisoosalInstntetions tor Waste ltlaterials.
on 10 JuIy L987, the original sunp lras exanined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. I{hen the o1d sump was removed from service,the area uas inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration !ilere noted.on
21 Novenber 1988 the New sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is Lncluded aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirementE specified in 40 cFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER AqTION IS WARRAI.ITED.
D. L. Covington
Envirotrmental Engineer
9 January 1991
in the
constructed of
containment
I,NIE NI,UBER! L57
III{IE ITOCIIION! It[-694
UNr!! DE8CRfPIIIONS Hazardous Waste SumpThis sump receives wastewater generated in theDanufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection systen.
OPEReffONeIr DAAE83 =
llhe original systen was installed in November 1985 andreplaced with the current systeu in October 1988.
ITANAGED TAg[883
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewatersludges from the manufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
RFA RECOUUEITDATIONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed Ehould be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
IIwEBEfGArION PlrAltgs
The procedures for turning off the lealcIights are found in the Thiokol manual,
indieator
DisposalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterials.
On 1O July L987, the original sump was examined forIeaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. I{hen the old sump hras removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol EnvironmentalEngineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
28 October 1988 the new sump was S,nspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed Lntoservice. Certification of Lnspection is included aspart of this report
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTIIER ACATON IS WARRN{TED.
D. Ir. CovLngrton
Environmental Engineer9 ilanuary 1991
IrNII ltt ldBER! 160
IrNIf ITOCATION! It[-125
IrNff DE8CRIPIfON3 North Hazardous Waste SumpThis sump receives wastewater generated in the
uanufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed ofconcrete and is inspected on a yearly basis by an
independent engineer.
OPERAl[fONAf,' DATES:
The existing system hras
1983.
TTA}IAGED WASTES:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA BECOUUBNDAAIONS3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or cto$.*r#"-** r eremoved. ffiffil*'.:,1: . ,.
- 'l
:
'j'" 'rSoils around aII su:nps which have been*,n,+S;"**. "*".**r*,t .:.upgraded should be sanpled for hazardoqi".:-;.jh,,,{tr,:,s,-:
constituents.
iil ;Bili.4l,..itgiiir :., .;
rl[vEsErcAErolt Pr'alt8 3 1{$:i',f:*rgei1ilt1^11i119'''*nlr'. ii rrjliiir}rll:'r:rri'
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol uanual, DispnsaLrnitntctions for waste lttaterials p whl 1rr*peerte*$ a*urotlyT
This sump is inspected on a yearly basis for leaks andbasic tank integrity by an independent engrineer. The
most recent inspection has certified the tank to bestructurally sound and watertight.
This unit meets the requirernents specified in 40 cFR
265.LgL for an existing tank system.
NO FI'RTHER AqrION IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
installed as a new unit in June
I,NIE NI,I.TBER3 161
IrNIE LOCAEIONS ltt-125
IrNfE DEBCA,fPTIO!{3 South Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed of
concrete and is inspected on a yearly basis by an
independent engineer.
OPERAEfONAIT DAIES:
The existing systeu was installed as a new unit in June
1983.
IIAITAGED f,A8TE8:
The wastes contal.ned in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
ercplosives.
RFA RECOId}TENDETTONS 3
Establish etandard procedures for respondl.ng to theleak indl.cator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be saupled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESIIIGAATON PI,ITTS S
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DisoosalInstntctions tor Waste-laterial s .
This sump is inspected on a yearly basis for leaks and
basic tank integrity by an independent engineer. The
most recent inspection has certified the tank to bestructurally sound and watertight.
This unit meets the requirements specified ln 40 CFR
265.191 for an existing tank system.
NO ft RTHER AgrrON IS WARRAITITED.
D. t. CovLngton
EnvironmentaL Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NI[ NT,UBER: L62, 163
I,NIT LOCATION: M-L25
T'NTT DEgcRrPrloN: old North and Middle Hazardous Waste sumps
These sumps received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant.
OPERIrIOilEL DA:IES 3
These systems were installed in l{ay 1969 and renainedin service until JuIy 1988 at which tine they were
removed.
ITAITAGED TA TE8 3
The wastes contained in these units uere wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
explosives.
nFa RECOUUEIIDAEIOII8 :
Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
rr'EsrrcArroN pr,An8r i,: ifr"j,, , :;"rr" ,
Theproceduresforturningoffthe.i4-ft*fffi$J.n,1t;,..'',*1,r,.lights are found in the Thiokol ma;r1'r$#id"iii.:.ri*, ::i; ; .Instntetions for Waste l(aterials. ' ":.,-.,,:ii,:.,: :: ::..
Before 12 January 1988, this suup was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the sump was removed from service, the
area rras inspected by a Thiokol Environmental Engineer.
No FITRTHER AcrroN rs WARRANTED. \ rtr*lJu 0{
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
\ n sp'q t+t#nJ T
I,NrI lgt UBER8 L64
I,NI! LOeeArONs ti-L26
UttIE DEgcRfPUoN: South Hazardous Waste Sumo
This sump receives wastewater generated ln the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIOIIAIT DAIEgt
The original systen was installed in May 1959 and
replaced with the current system in JuIy 1988.
IItrIIAGED f,A8[Eg3
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the nanufacturing and processing of
e:<plosl.ves.
RFA RECOUUEITDAEIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Sol.ls around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIwEEEIGAEION PITAN8s
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual., DisFc.salInstntctions tor Waste l,Iaterials.
on 8 October L987, the original sunp was exanLned for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the o1d sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloratLon lrere noted. On
14 iluly 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER AqTTON IS WARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
o
I'NI8 NIIITBER: 165
IrNff ITOCAEION: ItI-87
IrNII DEgCRfPIIOtts North Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. Bhe sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIOITAL DATESS
Bhe original system was installed in Septenber L962 and
replaced with the current system in December 1988.
ITAITAGED f,A8TEs:
The wastes contained ln this unit are wastewater
sludges from the nanufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
RFA RECOUUEIIDA'TTON8 !Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
f!{VE8IIGAEION PfrANgs
The procedures for turning off the leak l.ndicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Dispnsal
Instntctions for Waste ilaterials.
On 12 December L987, the original sump was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Iilhen the old suup was reuoved from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration lrere noted. On
1O Decenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent EngLneer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RTHER AErION IS I{ARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Bngineer
9 January 1991l)
I,NIS tn UBms 166
I'NIA LOCAEIONs YI-526
IINIB DE8CBIPEfONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
fiberglass and is equipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection systen
OPERAAIONAIT DAlEgt
The original system was installed in ilanuary 1985 and
replaced with the current systeu in December 1988.
IIAITAGED f,a,8l[Eg!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:<pJ.osives.
RFA NBCOUITEITDAEION8 :
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been reuoved and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IilVE8EIGAEION PIrlItS :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found ln the rhiokol manual, Dispnsalfnstntetions for Waste ttlaterials.
on 10 JuIy L987, the original sunp was examined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. $lhen the o1d Eunp was renoved from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
29 December 1988, the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requireuents specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FI'RTHER AETTON TS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covingrton
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIE NI'UBER3 L67
InffE LOCATIONS It[-571
Itttf[ DEBCRIPEIONS North Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is construeted offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection system.
OPERAIIIOITEL DATES!
The original system was installed in Novenber 1962 andreplaced with the current system in October 1988.
TTAITAGED f,48tr88!
lrhe wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing ofexplosives.
RFE RECOUUEITDASIONS !Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Strmps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
IITVEESIGIEIOU PLEITSS
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DLsposalInstntetions for Waste ttlaterials.
On 6 July L987, the original sunp was exanLned forleaks and basic tanlc integrity by an independentengineer. Wtlen the old sump was removed from serviee,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
24 October 1988 the new sump was inspebted by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of Lnspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO r"I'RIHER AETION IS WARRANTED.
D. Ir. Covington
EnvLronmental Engineer9 January 1991
I,l[rE mndBERs 168, 314
IrNIE ITOCAEfONS It[-571
IrNIf DE8CRIP![IOI[: South Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection system.
OPERAUONAI. DATES 3
The original system was installed in Novenber L962 and
replaced with the current system in October 1988.
UAXEGED f,Ag[E8!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RTA RECOUITEITDAtrIOITS sEstablish standard procedures for responding to the
Leak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESTIGATTOU PT,NT8 S
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DistrnsalInstntctions tor Waste ltlaterials.
On 10 July L987, the original sump was examined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sunp was reDoved from service,the area was inspected by a Thiolcol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
21 October 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the reguirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACSTON IS WARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'ITIE ITI'UBERS 169
IrNIf IrOCjtrIIONs Al-5?2
IrltIT DB8CRIPIION: Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater grenerated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containnent
and a leak detection system
OPERaEIOIIAL DefES:
The original system was installed in November L952 and
replaced with the current system in October 1988.
TTAITAGED TA8I|E8S
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA BECOUITENDAIIOIT8 3Establish standard procedures for responding to the
leak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IllVEgtrfGAEfON Pllltg:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DlsPosal
InstntetLons tor Waste ltlaterLals.
On 10 July L98?, the orJ.gS.na1 sunp uas examined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was reDoved from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
21 October 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unl.t ueets the requirenents specified in 40 cFR
265 for a tank systen.
NO TURTHER A TTON IS WARRAI{TED.
D. Ir. CovLngton
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIT NI'I,IBER! 17O
IINII I.OCAEIONS lt[-573
UNIII DE8CRIPEION3 West Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAEfONAIT DAtrES3
The original systeu was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in March L987.
l,tAltAGED fAgTES!
The wastes contained in thls unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUITETTDAEIONS S
EstablLsh standard procedures for respondl.ng to theleak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be saupled for hazardous waste
constituents.
TNVESSIGAEIOU PT.AN8:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the ThiokoJ. uanual, DispnsalInstntctLons for Waste Materials.
This buil.ding was completely destroyed by an erqrlosion.
I{hen it was rebuilt a new sump was installed. On 12April 87 the new sump was inspected by an Independent
Engineer prior to being placed into service.Certification of inspection is included as part of thisreport.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CfR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO FT'RTHER ACTTON TS WARRJNTTED.
D. L. Covingrton
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT }IT,UBER: L7L
IINIII ITOCATfONS M-81
IrNft! DE8CRfP[fON3 Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastevater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERIIIIONIL DAIES:
This system was installed as a new unit in Septenber
1988.
UENACED TA8trE8!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the nanufacturing and processing of
e:qllosives.
RFA BECOUITENDArIOI{8S
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
leak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVE8TIGAETON PLAITS I
The procedures for turnlng off ttre leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DLsoosalInstntetions for Waste ltlaterials.
The new suup was inspected by an Independent Engineerprior to being placed into service. Certification of
inspection is included as part of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS WARRAI(TED.
D. L. Covingrton
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NII NI,UBER3 L72
IrNrS LOCATTON: Dt-505
IrNIT DE8CRIPIfON! North Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is in the
constructed of
containment
OPERAIIOIIAIT DAIE83
The original system was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in October 1988.
IiTAITAGED f,A8iTE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sJ.udges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFI RECOUUEITDAEIOXS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Strmps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been reuoved and
upgraded should be sarnpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
fNVES|IIGATf ON PIrAltg 3
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol uanual, DisposalInstntctions for glaste ldaterials.
Before 12 January 1988, this sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Iillren the oLd sunp was removed fron service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
13 october 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the reguirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT,RTHER ACTION TS WARRAIiITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
fiberglass and is equipped with secondary
and a leak deteetion system.
I'NI8 ITI'UBERS L73
IrltIE ITOCAIION3 ItI-606
I,NIS DESCRIPIIONs South Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containnent
and a leak detection system.
OPERETTONAIJ DAEEE8
The original system was instaLled in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in october 1988.
ITIITAGED TAgEEgs
The wastes contained ln this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
exlrlosives.
BFA RECOUUENDEEIONSsEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps whlch have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IISVEEEIGAEION PTTENS :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DispnsalInstntctions for Waste ttlaterials.
Before 12 January 1988, this sunp was examined forleaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the oId sump rras removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloratLon were noted. On
13 October 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is Lncluded aspart of this report.
this unit meets the requirements specified ln 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRANIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
IINIS ITI'UBER! L74
I'NIT I,OCAAION3 !{-145
IINIE DEBCRfPIION: Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propell.ant. The sunp is constructed ofsteel reLnforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a lealc detection system.
OPERAIIIONAIJ DAAES I
The original system was installed in May 1961 and
replaced with the current system in October 1988.
IIAITAGED f,Asi[E8S
The wastes contaLned in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
RFI RECOUITEITDATIONS !
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
leak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sunps which have been reuoved and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste. constituents.
IIIVESIIGAEION PIre$8 3
The procedures for turning off the leak indLcatorlights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DLsposalrnstntctions for Waste ltlateria-Ls.
On 8 October 1987, the original sump was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. $lhen the old suup was removed from service,the area was inspected by a ThLokol Environmental
EngLneer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
25 October 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
independent Engineer pr5.or to being placed lntoservice. Certification of inspection iE included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirenents specified in 40 cFR
265 for a tank system.
NO TURTIIER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
OPERItrIONAIT DATEE:
The original
replaced with
ITATIAGED WASTEE:
I'NI8 ITI'U8ERS L76
IrNIE ITOCAAION: M-309
IrNIS DE8CRIPIION: Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
steel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
system was installed in September 1986 and
the current system in April 1988.
The wastes contained ln this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
ntre RECOUI.IEIID1Af ONE :
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIM8AfGAEION PIrlItB:the procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DispnsalInstntctions tor Waste ttlaterials.
Before 12 January 1988, this sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independent
engineer. Wtlen the old 6ump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted.
on 6 April 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specS,fied in 40 cFR
265 for a tank system.
NO TURTHER ACTION IS WARRAIflIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NTT NT'UBER3 L77
I'NIT T.OCAATON: E-502
ITNMEgcRIPffONs Deactivated Sump
This sump received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant.
OPERAITONAII DeIEgt
The original systeu was installed in November L962 and
replaced with a fiberglass sunp with leak"detectl.on and
secondary containment in Novenber 1988. In JuIy 1990the sunp was removed from service.
TTAITAGED rn8!E8S
The wastes contained in this unit were wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
enplosives.
RTA RECOUUETTDAIIOf,8 SEstablish standard procedures for respondl.ng to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
fNVEg|[IGerIOf, Pf.Altg s
The proeedures for turning off the Leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Dlsl:r.salInstntctions tor Waste ltlateria.Ls.
Before 12 January 1988, the original sump was examinedfor Leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Wtlen the old sumps were removed fromservice, the area was inspected by a Thiokol
Environnental Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration
were noted. On 28 November 1988 the new sump was
inspected by an Independent Engineer prior to beingplaced into service. CertLfication of J,nspection isincluded as part of this report. On 30 Augrust 1990 this
sump was renoved because the building was being
demolished. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION TS WARRAIflTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIE NI'UBER3 L78
T-n LOCArION! It[-s70
IrNIf DE8CRIPAION: Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
fiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection sYstem.
OPERIBIONAIT DAtrEg!
The originaL systen was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system l-n October 1988.
ITAITACED trA8EE8 3
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:<plosives.
NFA RECOTIIIEIIDAEIONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIVESEIGAIION PIflN8:
The procedures for turning off the leak indLcatorlights are found in the Thiokol uanual, Dl,sposalInstntetions for Waste llaterials.
on 6 JuIy L987, the original sunp was examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. l{tren the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No Leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
25 October 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being pJ.aced intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit neets the requireuents specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
T,NrI NI,ITBERs L79
UNII r.ocArloN. yl-524
ITNME8CRIPIION3 Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a lealc detection system
OPEnAIIOIIAL DAtrEg!
The original system was installed in February 1981 and
replaced with the current system in Novenber 1988.
UAITAGED TASEESS
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges frou the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUUENDArIONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps uhich have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIVESEIGAtrIOT PLNTS:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal
InstntctJons for Waste llaterials.
On 1O July 1987, the original sump uas examined forIeaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. $lhen the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. on
2 Novenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO I'URTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. CovJ,ngton
Environmental EngLneer
9 January 1991
I,NI! NIIIIIBER: 180
IrNIS IJOCITION. M-2O7
UNf!! DESCRfPEfONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sunp receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a lea|, detection system.
OPERATIONAIT DATE83
The original systen was installed in April 1968 and
replaced with the current system in Decenber 1988.
I{AIIAGED f,AgTEES
The wastes contained ln this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:<pJ.osives.
RFA RECOUI.IENDAAIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or cl.osed should be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVESATGATION PLAITE:
The procedures for turning off the leaklights are found in the Thiokol manuol,
indicator
DisElc.salfnstntctions for Waste lt[aterials.
On 21 Augnrst L987, the original sunp lras examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. On 27 Decenber 1988 ttre new sump was
inspected by an Independent Engineer prior to beingplaced into service. Certification of inspection is
included as part of this report.
This unit meets the requirenents specified ln 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ASTTON IS WARRAIflTED.
D. Lr. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIE NI'UBEB: 181
T,NIT IJOCATIOI{S It[-25
UIIIII DE8CRIPTION! Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAATOTAI, DATES t
The original system was installed in Novenber L964 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
UENAGED f,A8TE8:
The wastes contained ln this unit are wastewater
sludges frou the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RAA RECOUI[EllDA![fOtr8 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Leak indicator lights on the sumps.
Strmps which have been abandoned or closed should be
renoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
flMgAfGAtrION PLNtg:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the thiokol nanual, DLsp:r,salfnstntetions for Waste lttraterials.
on 25 october L987, the original sunp was exanined for
Ieaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sunp uas removed from service,the area was inspected by a trhiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration hrere noted. On
18 Novenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection iE included aspart of this report.
lhis unit neets the requlrementE specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO FTIRTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. Ir. Covington
EnvLronmental Engineer
9 January 1991
o I'NTT DIT'UBER: L82
I,NIT LOCAIION: T-91
INrE DEgCRfPuoIt: Nonhazardous Containment Sump
This unit collects water and nonhazardous corrosioninhibitor used in the testing of various rocket notor
components. The sump is constructed of steelreinforced concrete. The wastewater is taken to the
wastewater treatment facillty at IrI-705.
OPERATIONAIT DATE83 1985 - Present
IIAITAGED f,A8TE8!
The wastes contained in this unit are nonhazardous
wastewaters containing a corrosion intribitor. A copyof the UH&SI has been Lncluded in thls report forreference to the contents.
RIA BECOUITEITDAEIONS :
EstablLsh standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps whlch have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aJ.I sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
IIIVE8rIGAI'ION PLelt8:
This sunp is considered a nonhazardous sump. It is not
equipped with either leak detectl,on or double
containment.
NO FT'RTHER ACTTON IS I{ARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
i
MATERIAL HEALTH A}ID SAFETY INFORMATION
SERIAL NTIMBER: 00182 HEALTH: 2
REVISION NTIMBER: OOO5 FI,AI{MABILITY: 1
RELEASE DATE: 15 NoVEMBER 1990 REACTIVITY: 0
SPECIFIC IIAZARD: C
I. PRODUCT IDENTITICATIONA. TRADE NAI,TE Al{D SYNONY]}IS:
Corrosion Inhibitor
Corr-Shield K-7B. MAIIUFACTURER I S NAl,lE: Betz Laboratory
C. REFERENCES: Betz Laboratory I'ISDS
II. PHYSTCAI. DATA
A. APPEARANCE Al{D oDoR: Light yellow liquid, no distinguishing
odor
B. BOILING POINT (Degrees F.): >2L2
C. VAPOR PRESSITRE: Not deteruined
D. VAPOR DENSITY: Not detemined
E. SPECIFIC GRAVITY (H2O=1): 1.335
F. VOLATILE BY voLIrI'[E (t) : Not determined
G. EVAPORATION RATE (Ether=I) : <1
H. SOLUBILITY IN WATER: Conplete
I. pH! 10.9
III. TYPICAL COMPOSITIONA. HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS: * TLV PELBorate Not listed 5 urgln3 J.Orng/n3
(1303-e6-4)
Silicate Not listed lOutgrzn3 (T) 15ng/n3 (T)
sngln3 (R) 5nglm3 (R)
Nitrate Not listed NE NENitrite Sa1ts Not listed NE NE
(T) = Total Dust (R) = ResPirable Dust
IV. HEALTH HAZARD DATAA. THRESHOLD LII'{IT VALUE (Tw) : 5 ngln3, ModerateJ.y Toxic
(Category 2), due to the aqueous solution containing
water so1uble, silicate, nitrate, and nitrite sa1ts.
B. EFFECTS OT OVEREXPOSI'RE:1. INIIAI,ATION: NOt liStEd
2. EYES: Not listed
3. SKIN: May cause skin irritation on prolonged contact
4. SKIN ABSORPTION: Not listed
5. INGESTION: Not listed
V. EMERGENCY Al{D FIRST AID PROCEDI'RES
A. fNIIALATION: Move exposed individual to fresh air. Report
B.
SERIAL NO: 00182
REVISION NO: 0005
PAGE NO.: 2 OF 3
irnmediately to the Dispensary.
EYES: F1ush imnediat,ely with water for 15 ninutes and reportto the Dispensary.SKIN: Inmediately flush skin with pJ.enty of soap and waterfor at least 15 ninutes while removing contaminatedclothing. Launder clothing before reuse.
INGESTIoN: Report to the Dispensary.
At{D EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
FLASH POINT: >200 degrees F., Slight fire hazard (Category 1)
EXPLOSION LIMITS: None listed
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Water spray, carbon dioxide, dry
chemical and foam.
SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDIIRES: None
EXPIOSION IIAZARDS: None
c.
D.
VI . FIRE
A.
B.
e.
D.
E.
o
v
VII. REACTTVITY DATAA. STABILITY: Stable (Category 0)B. SPECIFIC HAZARD: Alkali (Category C)C. INCOMPATIBILITY (Materials to Avoid): Avoid nixing directlywith highly acidic materials.D. HAZARDOUS DECOIT{POSfTION PRODUCTS: Conplete deconposition
would cause emission of oxides of nitrogen.E. HAZARDOUS POLYIIERIZATION: Will not occur.
III. SPECIAL PRECAUTIONSA. PROTECTTVE MEASIIRES:1. VENTILATTON:a. Use only in well-ventilated areas with enough air
movenent to remove vapors and. prevent vapor buiJ.dup.b. An air mover should be installed to move the air andto reduce the vapor concentratj.on when working in aconfined or poorly ventilated area or when using
J.arge quantities of this material.2. RESPIRATORY PROTECIION:a. When using one quart or less and when the vapor
leve1 at the operatorrs breathing zone does NOT
exceed the TLV, no respirator is required,. (Safety
may be contacted to establish vapor concentration.)b. If the above condition does not apply, use one of thefollowing:(1) GMA cartridge in a chemical cartridge tlperespirator.(2) GMC cartridge if a GMA is not available.(3) A disposable organic respirator, Model 10001.c. A fuLlface air-line respirator shall be worn
when working in a confined or poorly ventilated areaor when using large quantities of this material.
PROTECTI1IE GIO\IES: NAtUrAl Nrbber3.
t SERIAL NO : O 018 2
REVISION NO: OOO5
PAGE NO: 3 OF 3
Chemical monogoggles or
Face shield
EQUIPMENT: Flame retardant coverallsor Smocks
4.
h,Jo
IX. HANDIJING AI.ID STORAGE PRECAUEIONSA. STORAGE PRECAUTIONS1. Read and obsenre aII container label precautions.
2. Keep asray from heat, sparksr or open flane.
3. Keep contaj.ners tightly closed.
4. Protect from freezing.B. ENGINEERING STORAGE REQUIREI'IENTS1. IBM Mainframe: Use IIRPCS 44L Format2. I{HSI Manual: Use Storage Appendix
X. E}TVIRON!{ENTAL PROTECIIONA. PRECAUTIONS IF MATERIAI, IS RELEASED OR SPILLED:1. Contact Safety and obsenre all Special Precautiolrs.2. Soak up using an absorbent naterial.3. Scoop up material and place in a sealable netal
container.4. Flush area with water.B. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD:
This material, should be cornpletely used if possible.
possible:If not
1. Surall quantities may be flushed down the drain with large
amounts of water.2. BuIk quantities should be transported to !,t-186 fordisposal in the inorganic industrial waste pond.C. EMPTY CONEAINERS
Enpty containers may be placed in a common trash receptaclefor subsequent burial in the sanitary landfill. For a contain-er to be considered empty, there must be less than threepercent of the uaterial remaining in the container. t
EYE PROTECTION:
OTHER PROTECTI\TE
I'IIIE NIII{BEIR: 183
uttlI rroeaaroNs lr[-508
IrNIf DE8CRIPIfONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propel}ant. The sump is constructed offiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a leak detection system.
OPERAIfONAL DAEES3
The original system was l.nstalled ln November 1962 and
replaced with the current systen in November 1988.
ITAITAGED f,Ag8E83
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:rplosives.
RFA BECO}IITEITDAEIOI{8 :
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Leak indicator lights on the sunps
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been reuoved and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
rNVEE.|IIGATION PTJENE 3
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntetions tor Waste tttaterials.
On 4 December 1987, the original sump was examined forleaks and baslc tank integrity by an independentengrineer. When the old sunp was renoved from service,the area lras inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No hazardous constituents were found. On 15
November 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unl.t meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO fl'RTHER ACTTON IS I{ARRN{TED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'I{IE UI'UBER3 184
lrNIS ITOCAIfOf,S U-590
IrNII DEBCRfPIION: East Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. Ehe sump Ls constructed of
fiberglass and is equipped with secondary
containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAEIOIIAL DAEES3
The original system was installed in November L962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
ITtrITAGED TA8[E8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
RFA RECOUIIEIIDAIIION8 :
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieak indicator lights on the sumps.
Strmps which have been abandoned or clo
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have bee
upgraded should be sampled for hazard
constituents.
TilVESATGAEION PI,NT8:
The procedures for turning off the Ie
lights are found in the Thiokol manudl,
fnstntctions tor Waste ltlaterials.
on 18 January 1988, the original sump hlas examined for
leaks and basic tank integrity by an independent
:xgiffi"[;.
iny-p,stiga*"-i"p"n.,"anil:.ffi #.$";:S;-Sfl ffi E-""giii**."YI_II_**o_,f"**"Ppetsq!i*_l-.g91_eage at .t_!g_-11ump site. rhe E6nelfuEion*=
;Etffi;fr -ffiou th6 -inv'd3Effietiarwas""that the onlyconstituent conclusively found to have been released
from the sump was egelLfg4*ggc^hlggLg.. _$pnoniumoerchrorate is not E tra#ftIEffi6--6ffi"ffip*gac.$I.o.rafe_ ie" frp* __**-ffilintri€i6ns" we?5totiliiA tt; Ee- ffilort ""tiiHiil ireetins thedefinition of a ignitable waste. The detaiLs of thisinvestigation can be found ln the report titled ,{5908SpiII ReJrorts. \> )AC'?,
On 15 November 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed lntoservice. A Certification of inspection is included aspart of thiE report.
I
T;ro'fl
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FURTHER ACTION TS WARRAIITED.
BEBERENCE DOCI'UENE8:
ttI590E Spi77 Retrnrts 74 June 7988
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer9 January 1991
T'NIT NT'UBER:185
IrNIr LOCATTONS !{-687
T'NTT DE8CRfPTfON: Deactivated gump
This unit is the site for an old hazardous waste'which received wastewaters generated in the
manufacturing of propellant.
OPER}TIONAL DATEE: L962 I L979
I{AIIAGED f,48lEg3
The wastes which were contained in this sunp were
wastewater sludges generated in the nanufacturing andprocessing of e>qrlosives.
RFI RECOI{ITEITDASIONS 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indl.cator lights on the sunps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sunps which have been renoved and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
sump
cleaned to
sump wasbuilding wasits usagte.
ITTVESIIGATION PIIATTS :
In November
remove anyfilled with
cleaned and
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
10 December 1991
L987, this sump was pumped andresidual reactive material. Thegravel and the trough from thefilled rrith concrete to prevent
NO FT,RTHER ACTION TS PI,ANNED TN THE RFI .
UNTA NI'UBERS L8?
uilrt LocArroNs E-512
UNIIr DE8CRIPIIONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
nanufacturing of plastic and plastic parts. The sump is
constructed of steel and is equipped with secondary
containment and a leak detection systeu.
OPERIAIODIAL, DATES:
The original systen was installed in Novenber L962 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
IOIIAGED TA8![E8 s
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing ofplastic and plastic parts.
R.rA RECOUIIEITDATTONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIMSSIGAEIOII PIrAltg s
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorIights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterials.
On 1 October L987, the original sump was examined forIeaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. The old sump was used for the secondary
containment. On 4 November 1988 the new sump rras
inspected by an fndependent Engineer prior to beingplaced lnto service. Certification of inspection isincluded as part of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified ln 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO I'T'RTIIER ACTION IS WARRA}ITED.
D. Ir. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
IrltIT In UBER! 188
I,NII TJOCAtrIONI M-629
mtlr DESCRIPITONS Hazardous Waste sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed of
fiberglass and is eguipped with secondary containment
and a Leak detection system
OPERaIIOIIAL DAIES3
The original system was installed in Augrust L962 and
replaced with the current system in October 1988.
TIIIIAGED f,A8TE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
e:<plosives.
nFA REcOUltEltDAifIONg sEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps whlch have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all surnps whl,ch have been removed and
upgraded should be saupled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESIIIGITTON PIANgs
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisoosalInstntctions for Waste tiaterials.
On 05 July 1987, the original sump lras examined for
Leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. l{hen the old sunp hras removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environnental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration t ere noted. On
18 October 1988 the new sump nas inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed Lntoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO fl'RTHER ACBION TS WARRA}flTED.
D. Ir. Covington
Environmental Engineer9 January 1991
I,NIT }IT,TTBER: 189
IINIE ITOCATION: E-5L7
UNII DE8CRIPIIOI{: Nonhazardous Contai
This unit receives wastewater generated from anodizingprocesses. This sump is constructed of fiberglass butis not-equipped with secondary containnent or a leakdetection system.
OPERATIOTTAI| DA.ITE83
The system was installed in November L962 and remainsoperational at the present time.
I{AITAGED f,A8TE8:
trhe wastes contained in this unit are nonhazardous
wastewater flows.
RFA NECOI{ITEITDAEIONS 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be saupJ.ed for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVE8ITGATIOIT PLIITS :
lfhiokol has routinely sampled the contents of this sump
and has classified it as a nonhazardous contaLnmentsump. In addition to this saupling, the wastewaters
are monitored weekly for pH by the building and the
contents neutralized if reguired. The water iscollected from the sump and taken to the wastewater
treatment facility. This tank is nade of fiberglass and
Ls non-corrosive.
NO I,T'RTHER AETTON IS WARRANTED.
A. f. Wa1ker
Environnental Engineer
10 December 1991
o
MTIA NI,UBER: 19O
IINIS IJOCATIONI ll-L74
IINrI DE8CRIPtrION3 West Hazardous Waste SumpThis suup receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a lealc detection system.
OPBRaTIOIIAL DArES:
The original system was installed in ApriJ. 1985 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
ITAITAGED f,A8TE8 S
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:<plosives.
RFI RECOU}TEITDATIONS 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator J.ights on the sunps.
Srrmps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded shouLd be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
INVEETTGAEION PTIIITS:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol uanual, DLsposalInstntctions for Waste l{ateria.ls.
Before 12 January 1988, the original sump was examinedfor leaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was reuoved from service,the area was inspected by a ThLokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
11 Novenber 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTIIER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. Ir. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
T,NIT TIT,UBER: 196
UNI![ ITOCATION: M-34
IrNfT DEBCRfPIfON: OId Perchloric Acid Sump
This unit was used on a one-time basis to holdneutralized perchloric acid following a 4tO00 gallon
spill in 1967.
ttAltAGED rAgfES3
oxidizing Agent
OPERATIONAE DATES 2 L967
RFE RECOIIUBNDArIOTS 3
Soil sanpling to assure no waste remains.
IIwE8TIGAIfON PrreNS!
the sump rras used on a one-time basis to contain theneutralized acid during the clean-up process followingthe spill. The sump was then removed from the site.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI.AI{NED.
RETERENCE DOCI'ITENITSS
Preliminary Assessment and Site fnspection of Thiokol
EcoToW and Environment. Inc.. June 7983
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
19 November 1991
T,NTT }IT,UBER: 310
IINfI ITOCATION: M-323
IINIE DEBCRIPTION: Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped_with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPER1AIOilAIT DAIE8!
ThiE systen was installed as a new unit 15 May 1987.
ltAltAGED rA8![Eg 3
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
o<grlosives.
RFA RECOIdI.!END1Ef ONB s
Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Strmps whlch have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituentE.
rlIVEgl[fcAl[IOt PLeNg:
the procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterLals.
On 15 !{ay 1987 the new sunp was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit ueets the requirements specified in 40 cFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT NI,UBER3 311
ITNM.OCATION: !{-157
IrNfT DEBCRfPffof,: OId Hazardous Waste Sumo
This small sump received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. :
OPERAIIONAL DAIEST
The system uas installed in Septenbec L962 and remainedin service until Septenber 1986 at which tine it was
removed. Current operations in this buil.ding do notrequire a hazardous waste sump.
IIAITAGED f,A8EE83
The wastes contained in this unit were wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
erqllosives.
RFA RECOUUEIIDEEIONS S
EstablLsh standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIIVE8IIGAIIION PIrAttE:
I{hen the sunp was removed, the area was filled in withsoil.
NO FT'RTHER ACrION IS I{ARRAMIED.
D. L. Covington
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'ITIE NT'I{BERs 3L2
IrNIf LOCAIIONS !.t-305
UltIS DEgCRfPUOtts Nonhazardous Containment Sump
This unit is to collect water and nontrazardous oil from
the motor transport building. The sunp is constructedof steel reinforced eonerete. The wastewater is takento the wastewater treatment facility.
OPERITIOIIAIr DITES: 1985 - Present
ITAITAGED f,48[88:
The wastes contained in this unit are nonhazardous
wastewaters containing a suall auount of oil.
RFE RECOUI{ETTDAETONS !
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sunps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IN\7E8IIGAIION PL'AltB :
This sump is considered a nonhazardous sump. It is not
equipped with either Leak detection or double
containment.
NO FT'RTHER ACTTON TS T{ARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT NT,UBER: 313
IINIE ITOCAEION: S-608
IrNfT DE8CRfPIION: Efnersency Containment Sump
This unit serves as an emergency containment sump forpropellant ingredient storage building. The sump isconstructed of fiberglass and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection systen.
OPEREEIONAI, DATESS
The existing system was installed in October 1982.
}TAIIAGED f,A8lEgs
In the event that this sump is needed, any wastescontained therein would be considered wastewatersludges from the manufacturing and processing of
er<plosives.
BFe RECOUttEttDA,|[rOtrg :
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
IITVESETGAAIOil PLEITS :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicator).ights are found in the Thiokol nanual, DisposalInstntctions tor Waste [tlaterials.
This unit should not be classified as a SWMU, as it isfor emergency use only.
This unit meets the reguirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO FT'RTHER AETTON IS WARRAIiIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 ilanuary 1991
TINIT NTIUBER:316
IINII I'OCAEIONz !l-622
UNfl[ DEBCRIPUON: Deactivated Hazardous Waste Sumps
This unit consists of two sumps which collect
wastewater in the event the deluge system.. is activatedin building M-522. The trenches to these sumps were
sealed prior to 12 ilanuary 1988. Later these two sumps
were removed from the site.
OPERAETONAI., DATES:
For a detailed suumary of the operational. dates, referto the SWITIU summary tables.
ttAltAGED trAs:[Egs
These sumps were used in the past for containing
wastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
RFA RECOUIIENDEEIONS S
Remove deactivated sumps to avoid accumulation ofliquids which uay be perceived as hazardous.
TITVESTIGAIION PI.IN8 !
These sumps have been physically renoved fron the area.
No leaks or soil discoloration were noted around themat the tine they were reuoved.
NO FI'RTHER ACTTON IS WARRA!flTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
19 May 1992
I,NIT NI,UBER: 3TI
UI{II IJOCAAION: M-638
IINII DE8CRIPIIOIIS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofstainless steel and is equipped with secondary
containment and a leak detection system.
OPERaEfONAL DAfEgS
This system was installed as a new unit in March 1988.
IiAITAGED TA8:[88:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUUENDErIONSS
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESSIGEEION PITIN8 :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorllghts are found in the Thiokol manual, DLsposalInstntctions tor Waste Materials.
On 23 March 1988 this new sump rras inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certiflcation of S.nspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS I{ARRAI{TED.
D. L. Covington
Envl,ronmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIT NT'T{BER: 323
IIDIII LOCATIONs !{-115
Uttll! DEgeRIPEIoNs fnactive or Deactivated Hazardous Waste Sump
gtris unit consists of a hazardous waste sump located at
a building which has been deactivated or no longer
generates-hazardous waste flows reguiring a containnent
sump. This sump was taken out of service prior to
1988.
OPERAIIIOIIAIT DAIE8 s
operation dates vary for each of the sumps. For adetailed sunmary of the operational dates, refer to the
SW!,!U summary tables.
TTAITAGED !IA8EE8 s
This sump was used in the past for containing
wastewater sludges from the manufacturing and
processing of explosives.
RTA BECOUIIETIDA'TIONS 3
Remove deactivated sumps to avoid accumulation ofIiquids which may be perceived as hazardous.
IITVEStrIGAAION PI,EN8 S
An evaluation of this sunp will be made to deteruine ifthe possibility exists that the building will reguire
containment for hazardous wastes in the future. If the
sump does not ueet the requirements for a tank system
as specified Ln 4O CFR 265 the sunp will physically be
removed and the site investigated according to the
sanpling plan titled SoLl Investigation Procedures
?oL7owing Sump RemovaT.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 December 1991
I,NIT [I,I{BER3 324
IrNIf ITOCAAIONs !{-115
mtrI DE8CRIPtrIONS Motor Rework Hazardous Waste SumpThis sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructedof steel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection systeu.
OPERATfONAL DATES:
The original
replaced with
TIA}IAGED TA8TE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewatersludges from the manufacturing and processing of
exgrlosives.
RFI RECOUUEI{DATIONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aIJ. sunps which have been renoved and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
fIwE8IIGAEIOII PLANS!
system was installed in November 1981 andthe current system in January 1989.
The procedures for turning off the leaklights are found in the Thiokol manual,
indicator
DisposalInstntctions for Waste ltlaterials.
On 29 Septenber L987, the original sunp was examinedfor leaks and basic tank lntegrity by an independentengineer. t{tlen the old sunp ias ienoved fron- service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted.On
20 January 1989 the new sump rras inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. covingtoni
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
IINII NIrldBERs 327, 328
IrNII LOCAIIfON: !{-115
IrNIT DE8CRIPUOI: Tactical Motor Washout Hazardous Waste SumpThis unit consists of two sumps in a series which
receive wastewater generated in the manufacturing ofpropellant. The sump is constructed of concrete and is
inspected on a yearly basis by an Lndependent engineer.
OPERATIOIIAL, DefEBt
The existing system was installed as a new unit ln JuIy
1986.
l.tlltAGED f,AgBEg 3
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosJ.ves.
RTA RECOUUEIIDAIIONS SEstablish standard procedures for responding to the
Iealc indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESIIGAEION PT.INS 3
This sump is inspected on a yearly basis for leaks andbasic tank integrity by an independent engineer. The
most recent inspection has certified the tank to bestructurally sound and watertight.
This unit neets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265.191 for an existing tank systeu.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRAIITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NI! ITUUBERs 333
UI{IA LOCATfON: tI-573
UNfA DE8CRIPIION! East Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containnent and a leak detection system.
OPERtrIIO}IAL DATE8 t
The original system was installed in November L962. In
March 1986 the buildlng was destroyed in an e:qrlosion.
A new sump rras installed in March 1987.
ITAITAGED TASEES!
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and proeessing of
explosives.
RFA RECOtlttEl[DAAIONg 3Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
III.EEIGAEION PIreNgs
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions for Waste ttlaterials.
This building uas conpletely destroyed by an enplosion.
I{hen it was rebuilt this sump was installed. On 12ApriL L987 the new sump was inspected by an Independent
Engineer prior to being placed into service.Certification of inspection is included as part of this
report.
This unit meets the requireuents specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRA}flTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIT NI'UBER3 346
I,NIE LOCAIIONs ItI-87
IrNIf DE8CRIPIIION: Elnerqencv Containment Sump
This unit serves as an emergency containment sump only.
OPERAIIIONAL DATES 3
The existing system was installed in Septbubei L962.
IiAITAGED TA8TE8 3
In the event that this sump is needed, any wastes
contained therein would be considered wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
ercplosives.
RFA RECOU}TEIIDATTONS S
Establish standard procedures for responding to the
Ieak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVESrIGAETOf, PI.ET8:
The procedures for turning off the leaklights are found in the Thiokol manuErl,Instntctions for Waste ttlaterials .
Thls sump is for emergency containmentnot be classified as a S$IMU.
NO TURTHER ACTTON IS WARRA}ITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
indicator
Disposal
-
only and should
I'NIE NI'UBERS 351
I'NIE LOEATIONI T-LL2
IrNII DE8CRfPtrIONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPER1EIONAIT DAEES:
Thls systeu was installed as a new unit in March 1988.
I{A}IAGED TAS8B8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
err;llosives.
RFA RECOU}IEITDAEIONS S
Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all strmps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIEVEStrIGAIION PLeil8:
l[he procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DistrpsalInstntctions tor Waste tttaterials.
The new sump was inspected by an Independent Engineer
aE it was placed into service. Certification ofinspection is included in this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS WARRNITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Eng5.neer
9 January 1991
I'IIIE UI'UBER! 454
UXIT LOCAEIONS It!-43
UilIf DE8CRIPEIONS Hazardous Waste SumpThis sump receives wastewater generated in thenanufacturing of propellant. This sump is constructedof steel reinforced concrete and is equipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAITONAD DA!88: -
The original. system was Lnstalled in septenber 1958 and
repl.aced with the current system on Deceuber 17 1988.
TTAITAGED TA8EE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
e:<plosl.ves.
RFA BECOUUEITDATIOITS !Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous wasteconstituents.
INVESEIGI|IIOT PLEil8 3
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorIights are found in the Thiokol manual, DislnsalInstntct ions Jor W aste ttlateria] s .
Before Jan. LZ 1988, the original sump was examined forleaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. Iiltlen the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineerr Do leaks or soil discoloration was observed.
On 17 December 1988 the new sump rras inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice.
This unit meets the requirements speclfied in CfR 40for a tank system.
NO FI'RTHER AETION IS WARRAT{TED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer9 January 1991
I'NIT
I'NIT
I'NIT
NT,UBERg 456
LOCAtrfONs !'I-56
DEgCRfPtrION 3 EtnerqencyJonta iilnenlSump
This unit serves as an emergency containment sump, to
be used only in the case of a spill.
OPERIIIOIIAIT DATE8:
The existing systen was installed in March 1950.
UENAGED TASEEE:
This unit is not used in
as emergency containment
RFA RECOUUETIDATTONE:
management of wast€sr butproduct solvents.
thefor
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous wasteeonstituents.
IIIVESEIGAIIIOIT PI.AI[8 :
The procedures for turning off the leaklights are found in the Thiokol manuol,Instntctions tor Waste ltlateria]s.
Thls sump is for emergency use only andclassified as a SWMU.
NO FI'RSITER ASTION IS WARRAIflIED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
indicator
Disposal
should not be
I'NIT NT'UBER3 457
IrNIf ITOCAIIONS It[-83
IrNIf DEgCRIPtrIOilS OLd Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump received uastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propelLant.
OPERAIIONAIT DAABS!
The systeu was installed in Decenber L957 and remainedin service until 1988 at which time it was removed.Current operations in this bui}ding do not reguire a
hazardous waste sump.
}TANAGED f,48tr88:
lfhe wastes contained in this unit were wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUITETTDITIONS 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around aII sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVEgrIGATTOI| PI,AN8:
Wtren the surnp rras removed in 1988, the area was graded
and covered with gravel.
NO FI'RTTIER ACTION IS WARRNITED.
D. L,. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
UINI! NI'UBER: 487
IrNIr LOCAIIION: It{-320
I,Nrl[ DE8CBIPTIONS West Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary eontainment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIONAIT DAEEB tThis system was installed as a neu unit in l.tay 1988.
ITAITAGED [A8TE8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
e:rplosives.
RFA RECOI,I}TEITDAEIONS S
Establish standard procedures for responding to theIeak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or cLosed Ehould be
removed.
Soils around all sunps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sampled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIwE8IIIGAIIrON PLN[8 s
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal-Instntctions for Waste ltlateria.ls.
on 20 May 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FURTHER AeffON IS WARRAI.ITED.
D. Ir. Covington
Environnental Engineer
9 January 1991
UIIIII NI,UBERS 488
IrNrI LOCA'IION3 !{-320
IrNrI DE8CRIPTIOII3 East Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propel.lant. The sump is constructed of
steel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPEREETOIIEL DATEE:This system was installed as a nel unit in t'tay 1988.
ITAITAGED TA8[E8:
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOIIITEITDATIONS 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IIMBEIGITION PIrIIIE:
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions tot Waste ttlaterials.
On 20 May 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being pJ,aced intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
Bhis unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO TI'RTHER ACTTON IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT NT,UBER3 489
ITNMTOCAIIION! It[-320
IINIS DEBCRIPIIONS North Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sunp is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERAtrfONeL' DAEESIThis systern was installed as a new unit in May 1988.
}TAIIAGED TAETE8 S
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RBA RECOUIiTEITDAIION8 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESIIGEIION PIJAITE 3
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, Disposal
Instntctl,ons for Waste ttlateria-Ls.
On 20 lrIay 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS IfARRNITED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
T,NI[ NT,UBERS 497
ITNMTOCAIfON: T-53
UNfl[ DE8CRIPIIONs Emeroencv Containment Sump
This unit is an emergency containment sump. ft would
only be used in the case of a spill or to collect
deluge water or a hydraulic oil spilI.
OPERATIONED DAIE8S
The existing system was installed in 1982:
ITAITAGED f,A8TE8:
Any wastes contained in this unit would be product
material fron a spill or deluge water.
RtrA RECOU}TENDAIIONE 3
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
INVE8AfGATION PfreNg s
llhis unit does not meet the definition of a SlnIU. It is
used as euergency containment in the case of an
accidental spill from a production area and is not usedto manage waste.5
NO FI'RTHER ACTTON IS WARRAI{TED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
tRcRA Facility Assessment cuidance, oct-86, Pg I-4
UNIT NUUBERI 540
Ultli[ IrOCAIIION: T-21B
UNIID DE8CRIPIIION: Deactivated Non-Hazardous Waste Sump
This unit was a non-hazardous waste sump located at T-
zLB. The sump was deactivated and removed frou thesite.
OPERAtrIOIIAL DAl[EgS
For a detailed summary of the operational dates, referto the S!{UU summary tables. The sunp system was removed
from service on 19 August 1991.
ITAITAGED r}8TE83
This sump was used in the past for containing
wastewater sludges from the uanufacturing andprocessing of flare casings.
RFA RECOUI{EITDAIION8 S
Remove deactivated sumps to avoid accumulatLon ofliquids which may be perceived as hazardous.
IIMBTIGATION PLAIIS:
This sump was renoved on 19 August 1991. The tank was
inspected by Environmental Monitoring Personnel and
found to be in good condition. SoiI samples were taken
from beneath and around the sump at the tiue ofrenoval. The results of the analysis are included withthis report.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
19 May 1992
2(f,ra
BORATORY WORK REOUEST to7D-7/- i3 <f'-
Ng 667s?3
.^-j.'rl:
L Lsr,
EXTENSIOT{
\\b\ t
COST CENTER
\\\f)
PROJECT NO.TAsK ISUBTASx
ORGANIZATION \$
Lnu\lesrr1a.^\c-\ t.^.^. ..
MAIL STOP
\\\
WORX ORDER NO.
\ \\\3
USER I pCirr
SAMPLE INFORMATION
SAMPLE OESCMPT|ON
\ P .,n\
PART NO./STOCK NO.
\.>\B
B,<t r.t, \'rrnr.g 7- )e'7t
ASSEMELY SERIAL NO.
f
smrueD BY
ll
F
RAW MATERIAL
INPROCESS
POST PROCESS
SERIAL NO./LOT NO.ASSEMBLY PAST NO.
TEST REOUIRED OR OESCRIPTION OF WORX REOUIRED. INCLUDE REASON FOR REOUEST
-<- L P \.tr<\<"\: rr:..rrq. Sfs aU\. tN'\\..*\
-
REPORT RESUUTS I]
\\q\qr. \)c.r{
FOR I3BORATORY USE ONLY
SPECIAL INSTBUCTIONS
RESULTS OF I.AEORAIORY ANALYSUi DISPOSITION
f AccEPr f Be,EcT I REsAMPLE
FORM TC NO. I94E
'!. No
na C r I x :
Sampl e
I - AJ uni nun
?. AnE,ilony
3 . Arseni c
Saupl eNo
t{aCe(
Prep: Toeal HetaIs
*'::1 ::::Jiffl::
)-.* r-a
IteCals 0cCer:rrned
:Z-P. Tot
1n ug/L unlear ocherYirc
I111ts are Ilrted ln ( )
i.'-i{ Nr) ,-r,.-. ,,' -_==;_
Da(e Recelvrd 1-?= .:-
ga ( e Aoa i y:eri'i -7'i--',' /
TCLP Other
rpeclflcd
7 -i'i-:
( 100 )13
1{
15
L7
l8
Itrgne s i u.r
Iangane s e
(2)
(r10 )( 11)
Ec rcu ry
Nlckel
(.5)
€. Eariua
l0 - Copper
11- f ron
5. BeryltiuE
6 . Cadai ulr
( 130 )r5 ( l0 )
(7 )
({)
Potassiula
Selen i ua
,rnr
.-?.
7 - Calcius
Ochro'iua
9 - Cobal c
(10)19
20
?r--
Silve (
Sodi un
27,/(5).
( 50 )t 2,
( 50 )ThaIl f uE (50 )
(8)2Z - Tin
Othe r :
23 - vanadiun
2{ - Zlnc
(80)
The deEeccion Iilai fs
Concen t, ra Ced satlpl e s
Cor.sen t s :
obca ined using
rae E,hods can be
( 200 )
(10)
fJ aae AA aethods . fo r I es s
ucillzed-
( 50 )
l:- Lead
Other:
(50)
lisCed vere
flaael es6 AA
I udge
Ch.ar((
I'NT[ NI'UBER: 54L
T,NI8 LOCATION3 YI-L79
UttI![ DESCRIPIIONs Elnerqencv Containment Sump
This unit serves as an emergency containment sunp only.It is used as a back-up in case a degreaser fails. The
sump is constructed of steel reinforced concrete.
OPERATIO}IEIJ DATEs3
The existing system was installed in 20 May 1988.
}TENAGED TA8rE83
In the event that this sump is needed, any wastes
contained therein would be considered waste naterial
sludges fron the manufacturing and processing of rocket
motor cases.
RFA NECOUI{EIIDAEIONE :
Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sunps which have been abandoned or closed should be
removed.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVEESIGATTON PI.aITE :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorlights are found in the Thiokol manual, DisposalInstntctions tor Waste ttlaterials.
Thls sunp is for emergency use only and should not be
considered as a SIilIrtU.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank systeu.
NO FT'RTHER AETION IS WARRA}flTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
o I'NIT NI'UBERS 552
IrNII LOCAEXON? YI-L74
UNIA DE8CRIPIrION! East Hazardous Waste Sumo
This sump receives wastewater generated in the
manufacturing of propellant. The sump is constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and is eguipped with
secondary containment and a leak detection system.
OPERATIOTTAL DATE83
The original system was installed in ![arch 1983 and
replaced with the current system in November 1988.
ITAIIAGED TA8TE83
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
RFA RECOUUENDEAIONS:Establish standard procedures for responding to theleak indicator lights on the sumps.
Sumps which have been abandoned or closed should be
reDoved.
Soils around all sumps which have been removed and
upgraded should be sanpled for hazardous waste
constituents.
IITVESTTGAEION PT.NT8 :
The procedures for turning off the leak indicatorIights are found in the Thiokol manual, DistrnsalInstntctions for Waste ttlaterials.
Before 12 ilanuary 1988, this sump was exanined forleaks and basic tank integrity by an independentengineer. When the old sump was removed from service,the area was inspected by a Thiokol Environmental
Engineer. No leaks or soil discoloration were noted. On
11 November 1988 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
This unit meets the requirements specified in 40 CFR
265 for a tank system.
NO FT'RTHER AETION IS WARRANTED.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I,NIT ITI,I{BERS 573
IINI.I LOCAEION3 It[-701
IrltIT DEBCRIPTfONS Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump is designed to accept wastewater containingpotentially hazardous waste in the form of H!{X. This
sump is constructed of steel reinforced cbncrete and is
eguipped with secondary containment and a leakdetection system.
ITIIIAGED f,A8EE8 3
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
OPERAIIIOIIAL DATES!
This system was installed as a new unit on 31 May 1990.
RECOU}TEI{DATIONS:
This unit was installed following the RFA; therefore,it was not included in the RFA Report.
fNVE8TfGATION PLAIIS:
At the tine of preparing the RFI work plans, thisbuilding hras not yet operational and the sunp had not
received any wastes.
On 31 Uay 1990 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of J.nspection is included aspart of this report.
NO tr.T'RTHER ACTION IS PI.AI{NED.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
OZ October 1991
I,ITE NUUBERS 574
UNIT ITOCAEION3 Yl-7O2
Irl{IE DEBCRIPIIONS East Hazardous Waste Sump
This sump is designed to accept rrastewater containingpotentially hazardous waste in the form of HMX. This
sump is coirstructed of steel reinforced clncrete and is
equipped with secondary containment and a leak
detection system.
ITAITAGED TA8!T883
The wastes contained in this unit are wastewater
sludges from the uanufacturing and processing of
explosives.
OPERATIOITAI., DATES:
trhis systen was installed as a new unit on 04 June
1990.
RFA RECOUUEIIDATIONS S
This unit was installed following the RFA; therefore,it was not included in the RFA Report.
IIwE8AIGAAION PIrIIIS 3
At the tine of preparing the RFI work plans, thisbuilding was not yet operational and the sump had not
received any wastes.
On 04 June 1990 the new sunp vas inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is Lncluded aspart of this report.
NO FT'RTHER ACTTON IS PI.ANNED.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
IINTT NUUBER: 575
IrNfT ITOCAIfON: !{-7 02
I'NTT DEgCRIPtrfON: West Hazardous $laste Sump
This sump is designed to accept wastewater containingpotentially hazardous waste in the form of HI'XX. This
sump is constructed of steel reinforced cbncrete and is
equipped with secondary containment and a leakdetection system.
ITAITAGED TASTESs
trhe wastes contained ln thls unit are wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
OPERAAIONAI, DITES:
This system was installed as a new unit on 04 June
1990.
RFA RECOUITEITDAEIONS S
This unit was installed following the RFA; therefore,it was not included in the RFA Report.
IITVESTIGIIIIOf, PI,ATTS 3
At the tine of preparing the RFI work plans, thisbuilding was not yet operational and the sump had not
received any wastes.
On 04 June 1990 the new sump was inspected by an
Independent Engineer prior to being placed intoservice. Certification of inspection is included aspart of this report.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI.AI.TNED.
A. Frank I'ila1ker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
oF
H
(,
IN
ctFovt
FItr
C:zH}{
m
I'I{IE NI'UBER3 7
UIIII LOCAIION: M-136
IrNff DE8CRIPUON3 Solvent Pit *12
This unit received solvents contaminated with reactive
waste propellant. The waste solvents and containers
were open burned weekly. The pit was apprbxiuately 34feet long, 22 feet wide and 5 feet deep.
OPERA1rIONAL DArEB 3 L962 - Prior to November 1988
IiAIIAGED f,4s![Eg:
Spent halogenated soLvents, reactive wastes, and
wastewater treatment sludges from manufacturing andprocessing of sludges.
RfA nEeOUUEIIDAi[ION8: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
IITVESTIGATIOIT PI.AITS !
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
ll-736 Liquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications.
CLosure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 5 April L992.
NO TURTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED IN THE RFI.
RETERENCE DOCI,IIiENTS 3
ItI-736 I'iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
Closure Aoplications; Constntct,ion and ltaterial Testing
Report For Constntction of Low Permeable Covers For
LWAs at M-736
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
8 April Le92
T'NTT NT'UBER: 8
IINIT ITOCATION: M-136
IrNfT DESCRfPIION: Solvent Pit #11
This unit received solvents contaminated with reactive
waste propellant. The waste solvents were open burned
and the containers placed in pit #12 for burning. Thepit was approximately 35 feet long, 22 feet wide and 5feet deep.
OPERAEIONAL DAEEgs L962 - Prior to November 1988
}iAITAGED TASTES S
Spent halogenated solvents, reactive wastes and
wastewater treatment sludges from manufaeturing andprocessing of explosives.
RFA RECOIIIiEIIDABIONS: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
IITVESTTGATIOT PI,ANS :
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
!,t-136 Liquid Thermal Treatment Area Closure and Post
Closure Appllcations.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 6 April L992.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED IN THE RFI.
REFEREilCE DOCI,IIETTITS S
M-736 Liquid Thennal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications; constntction and ltaterial Testingr
Reoort For Constntction of Low Permeable Covers For
I'TTAs at M-736
A. Frank llalker
Environmental Engineer
L7 January 1991
T'IIIT }II'UBER: 9
UNI.|[ ITOCATION: I{-135
IrNIT DEgCRfPrroN: Nitrate Pit #2O
This unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing and processingr of propellant. The pit was
approximately 45 feet long, 22 feet wide and 4 to 5feet deep.
OPERAIIOIIAL DArES3 L962 - Prior to November 1988
IIAITAGED TASTESs
Wastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
RFA REeOUUEtDAffoNg: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
IIwE8IfGA![Iolt Pf.Ailg 3
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
t[-736 Liquid ThermaT Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applieations.
Closure activities began on 14 october 1991 and were
completed on 5 April L992.
NO FT,RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI.INED IN THE RFI.
REFEREITCB DOCI'IIEIII!8 :
trt-736 Liqtid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure AooTications; Constntction and ltlaterial Testing
Reoort For Constntction of Low Permeable Covers For
LffAs at ItI-736
A. Frank lf,alker
Environmental Engineer
L7 January 1991
UNTT NI,UBER3 10
UIIII LOCAIIolt3 u-136
T'NrI DB8CRIPTIOITS AP Pit #21
This unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing and processing of propellant. The pit wasapproxinately 50 feet long, 35 feet wide,'and 4 feet
deep.
OPEReTfOilAL DATE8. L962 - November 1988
UAIIAGED TA8TE8:
I{astewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of e:rplosives.
RFA RECOIIIiEIIDAIIIONE: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
fNVEEtrIGATIOlt Pf.tAltg 3
This unit has undergione closure as outlined in the
Itl-736 I'iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure AooLications.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 6 April L992.
NO I"URTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED IN THE RFI.
REFEREITCE DOCUUENIT8 !
l{-736 Liquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications 1 Constn etion and l[aterial Testing
Repnrt For Constntction of law Permeable Covers For
LTIAs at ItI-736
A. Frank $Ia1ker
Environmental Engineer
L7 January 1991
IINIT NITIIIBER: 11
IINIT L,OCATfON: l{-13 6
IINII DE8CRIPtrION: HIrIX Truck Washout Pit 422
rnis unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing and processing of propellant. The pit was
approximately eO feet in length, 42 feet in width and 3feet in depth.
OPERATIOIIAIT DAIE8. L975 - Prior to November 1988
IIAIIAGED II8[E8:
Ifastewater sludges fron the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
RFA BEeOUUEtDAffOtrS: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
ItrvESTrGATrOf, PIrtttS :
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
lI-736 Liquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applieations.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 6 April L992.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AIINED IN THE RFI.
REFERENCE DOCI'UEITEE S
I[-73e liouid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Apolications; Constntction and ttlaterial Testing
Report For Constntetion of I'ow Permeable Covers For
LWAs at ll-736
A. Frank l{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
18 January 1991
UNTA NT,UBERs L2
IrltIT L(rcAffOtr3 ItI-135
UttI! DESCRIP|IIOIT3 HMX PONd #25
This unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing and processing of propellant. The pit was
approximately 54 feet in length, 32 feet in width, and4 feet deep.
OPERAIIONAIT DAIEgz L975 - Prior to November 1988
IIAIIAGED fAgrES!
Wastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
RFA RECOIIIIEIIDATIOU8 3 Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
INVESTTGAEIOII PLlttg 3
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
I'I-736 I'iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Apolications.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 5 April L992.
NO FT'RTHER AETION IS PI,AI{NED IN THE RFI.
REFER,MTCE DOCI'IiEN!I8 3
ItI-736 Liouid Ther'mal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Apolications; Constntction and ltaterial Testing
Report For Constntction of Lov Permeable Covers For
LTfAs at lI-736
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
18 January 1991
UNIT NI,IiBERS 13
IrNII LocArlolt3 Ir[-136
UttII DE8CRIP8IOI{S HIO( Pond #24
This unit received wastewater generated in thenanufacturing and processing of propellant. The pit was
approximately 52 feet in length, 31 feet in width and 4feet deep.
OPERAIIONAIT DAIEE z L975 - Prior to November 1988
ITAf,AGED TA8![E8g
Wastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
RFA RECOIIIiEIIDAIIOf,S: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
IIwESEfGAEIOU Pf.ANg3
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
Id-736 Liquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 6 April L992.
NO FURTHER ACTTON IS PI,AI{NED TN THE RFI.
REFERENCE DOCI,IITEIMS !
ttl-736 I'iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Aoplications i Constntction and llaterial Testing
Report For Constntction of Low Permeable Covers For
LTfAs at M-736
A. Frank l{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
18 January 1991
UNIA NI,I{BM,t L4
IrNIE LOCAIIONS !{-136
I,NIT DE8CRIPTION3 HMX Pond #23
This unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing and processing of propellant. The pit was
approximately 55 feet in length, 34 feet in width and 3feet deep.
OPERAAIONAIT DAfESr L975 - Prior to November 1988
ITAITAGED [A8TES:
Wastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
RAA RBCOUIIEIIDA|IfOIIS: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
flrVEgrICA![fOf, PIre[8 s
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
ItI-736 Liquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Aoolications.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
coupleted on 5 April L992.
NO FT,RTHER ACTION IS PI.AI.INED IN THE RFI.
RETEREf,CE DOCI'IiEITTS S
I'I-736 Liottid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications; Constntction and lfiaterial Testing
Reoort Por Constntction of Low Permeable Covers For
LTfAs at I[-735
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
18 January 1991
T'NIT TW'UBER: 15
t IIIT LOCATfON: !{-13 6
IrNII DEgCRIPTfOil: West Sodium Azide Pond #268
This unit received wastewater generated in thenanufacturing and processing of propellant. The pit was
approximately 50 feet in length, 40 feet in width and 4feet deep.
OPERAAIOUAIT DAAEs3 I.Iid 1970s - Prior to November 1988
IIAIIAGED TA8lrEs:
Wastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of e:rplosives.
RFA RECOUIIEIDAIIOU8: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
I![VE8rIGA![IO![ PLAltg !
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
ItI-736 I'iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Aoolications.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 6 April L992.
NO FTIRTHER A TION TS PI,A}INED IN THE RTI.
REFERENCB DOCI'UEISTS 3
ItI-736 L,iquid Thetmal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Aoolications; Constntction and tttaterial Testingr
Report For Constntction of Lov PermeabTe Covers For
LMAs at t[-736
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
8 April L992
Illtr! NUI.IBER: 16
mtlf LOCAIIIOX: ItI-136
tttIl[ DEgCRIPfIOf,s Lower Sodiun Azide Pond #26W
This unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing and processing of propellant. This pit
was approximately 30 feet in length, 24 fbet in width
and 2 to 3 feet deep.
oPERAIIOUtrL DAIESs I.Iid 1970s - Prior to November 1988
IiAITAGED TAsTE83
$Iastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
RAA RECOUIiEIIDAIIIONS: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
IITVES:IIGAATOT PLEltS :
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
It[-736 I'iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 5 April L992.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI.,AIINED IN TTIE RTI.
RETERENCE DOCI'ItrEITTS S
ItI-736 Liouid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure AppTications; Constntction and ltlaterial Testing
Report For Constntction of Low Permeable Covers For
LWAs at t{-736
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
18 January 1991
I'NIT NUUBERS L7
I,NII LOCArIONs l{-136
UltfE DE8CRIE![IO![! Prooellant llastewater Pond #27N
This unit received wastewater generated in the
nanufacturing and processing of propellant. This pit
was approximately 105 feet in length, 1O5'feet in width
and 2 to 3 feet deep.
OPERATIOXAIT DATES:. L962 - Prior to November 1988
IIAITAGED TA8TE83
Wastewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of e:<plosives.
RfA RECOI{I{EIIDAIIIOilS: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
INVESTIGATTOU PLIIIS:
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
ll-736 Liouid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Aoolications.
Closure activities began on 14 October 1991 and were
completed on 6 April L992.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PIJU{NED IN lrHE RFT.
NEFEREtrCE DOCIIITEIITS :
It-736 I'iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications i Constntction and ltlaterial Testingr
Report For ConstntctLon of Low Permeable Covers For
I'TfAs at ttl-736
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
18 January 1991
I'NIT }IT'UBER: 18
ITIIfT LOCATION: U-136
UttII DESCBIPIIOUT Propellant Wastewater Pond *275
This unit received wastewater generated in the
manufacturing and processing of propellant. The pit was
approximately 105 feet in length, 1Oo feet in width and2 to 3 feet deep.
OPERAAIONAL DAAES. L962 - Prior to November 1988
l,tAltACED fAgIEg3
Wastewater sludges fron the manufacturing andprocessing of erqrlosives.
RFA RECOUIiEIIDAIfONS3 Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
fMZEgtrIGATf Olt PIrIIIS !
This unit has undergone closure as outlined in the
I,I-736 L,iquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applicat@..
Closure activities began on 14 October and were
completed on 5 April L992.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI.ANNED IN THE RFI.
RETERENCE DOCI'UEITtrg t
ItI-736 Liquid Thermal Treatment Area CTosure and Post
CTosure Applications i Constntction and ttlaterial Testinq
Report, For Constntction of I'ow Permeable Covers For
LTfAs at l[-736
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
18 January 1991
T,NIT M,UBER3 2L
UNIT LOCATTOTi T-29
UNIT DE8CRIPIIIONs Hvdrazine Treatment Facilitv
This unit was used on occasion to dispose of smal1
amounts of hydrazine. The unit consisted of a 10 footby 10 foot lined pond with a heating unit'in thecenter. Waste hydrazine was burned in the unit with
any overspray being captured by the urater in the pit.
OPERAIIOIIAL DATES: 1978 - November 1985
I{aNAGED fAgTES: Hydrazine
RfA RECOUUEIIDAIIONS: Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
IIWESAIGAAIOI{ PIreNg 3
A closure plan was submitted to the Bureau of So1id and
Hazardous Waste and approved on October 20, 1988.
Closure was completed on 21 August 1989 andcertification of closure has been submitted to theState Bureau of Solid and Hazardous Waste.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED IN THE RTT.
REFERENCE DOCInlEltTg
CTosure Plan T-29 Hydrazine Burn Pit'
CTosure of T-29 llydrazine Burn Pit - Results ofInvestioative Phase
A. Frank lilalker
Environmental Engineer
2L January 1991
T'NIT TII'UBER: 22
IINIT LOCAIIION: U-224
Irl[IT DE8CRfPIION! Earthen Shot Pond
This unit was used to dispose of wastewaters generatedin the development of propellant. Wastewaters flowed
through a gravity separation tank to sepaLate dense
contaminants, then into the unlined earthen pond.
Periodically the pond was detonated with erq>losives todestroy propellant which nay have been present. Theshot pond rras approxinately 2.5 feet deep and had ateardrop shape. Total surface area was approximately
55O feet.
OPBRATTONAIJ DATE8. L972 1985
ITAIIACED [Agl[Eg:
I{astewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of e:<plosives.
RfA RECOUIiEIIDAIIION8 3
Undergo an approved RCRA Closure
IITVESIIGAIIION PI,EN8 :
Original closure plans were subnitted to the Utah
Bureau of Solid and Hazardous lfaste in 1985 and revisedin 1989. Additional revisions were made to the plan in
January 1991 and in April 1991.
The closure plan was accepted by the IIBSIilI in May L99L,
and following the 45 day public conment period, apublic hearing was held 20 June 1991. Implementationof the closure plan was authorized by IIBSIM 3 July1991. Closure activities were conpleted 05 May 1992
and a report and Certification of Closure by an
independent engineer were submitted to the Division ofSolid and Hazardous Waste.
NO ADDITIONAL ACTION IS PI,AIINED IN THE RFI.
RETERENCE DOCMIE![!8 !
CTosure Plan M-224 Shot Pond. ilanuary 7997 revLsedApriT 7997; CTosure ot l{-224 Shot Pond Results ot SiteInvestiqation April 7992
A. Frank lrlalker
Environmental Engineer
2L January 1991
UIII:I ITU}TBER: 29L
IrNII ITOCAEIONS I't-136
IrNII DE8CRfPIfO[3 Drun Storaqe Yard
This site was used in the past as a 9o-day storage areafor drums of ha2ardous vaste.
ITAITAGED [48![88:
Laboratory chenicals, small containers of waste forconsolidation into large drums, corrosive wastes, andother itens generated for waste disposal.
OPERAIIIOIIAL DAIESs 1970's - Present
RfA RECOU}IEIIDAIION8 s
This unit was not addressed in the RFA Report.
ITVEEIICAIrOII PrJnNg 3
This facility is no longer reguired by Thiokol
Corporation, and has undergone closure procedures asoutlined in CTosure Plan. ItI-736 Dntm Storagre Area.
Closure was completed on 06 May 1992 and Certification
of Closure was submitted to The Bureau of Solid and
Hazardous Waste in the report titled CTosure of ItI-736
Dntm Storage Area.
NO N)DITTONAL INVESTIGATTON TS PI.,AITNED TOR THE RFI.
REFERENCE DOCT'}IENTS S
Closure Plan ItI-736 Dntm Storaae Area; CTosure of IiI-736
Dntm Storaqe Area llay 7992
A. F. I{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
08 May L992
I,NIA NT,UBER: 515
IINfA frOCA:[IONt 4,-392
IrNIf DEgCRfPffONs Special Containnent Vessels
These units were installed to provide temporary storagefor contaminated wastewaters until Thiokol,s wastewater
treatment plant was functional. A closur-e plan was
subnitted to US EPA as part of the permit application.
Closure of these units has been according to this plan
and certified by an independent engineer.
IttrlIAGED rAgrEgs
The wastes contained in these vessels hlere wastewater
sludges from the manufacturing and processing of
explosives.
OPERAEIOTTAE DAIES: November 1988 - Augrust 1990
RFA RECOUITEITDATIONS 3
Vessels should undergo an approved RCRA Closure.
IITVEStrIGATTON PI,AITE :
Operation and closure of these vessels has been
according to the Energency Pernit issued to Thiokol
Corporation by U. S. EPA. Certification of closure by
an independent engineer is incLuded in the attachnenttitled ltl-392 Special Containment Vessels.
NO FI'RTHER ACTTON IS PI,ANNED.
REFEREI{EE DOCIIIIENT8 :
ItI-392 Special Containment Vessels
A. F'rank Walker
Environmental Engineer
11 January 1991
tr,HUladctI,trttt,
tsts6)trr
tqlvt
T,NIT NUUBER: 25L
IINIT LOCATIOf,I U-86
IINIT DE8CRIPTIONs Surface I{ater Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by high pressurecutting, BAC cooling, boiler condensate, once-throughcooling, floor wash, and compressor condensate. Thedischarge is to a storm ditch which flowe to anevaporation/percolation area .
I{ANAGED fAgTEE: fndustrial l{astewater
ANIIUAIT VOt t UE Df8CEARGED: 597, 000 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIT DATE83 May L962 to Present
PREVTOUS IITVESAIGATIOUS 3
Analytical data is available for sanpling events dated05-10-88 and 02-05-87 in the report titled ThiokolCorporation Ground Water Oualtty Protection Report.
Septenber 7997.
RFA RECOITIIEIIDAIITON8 !
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coNSErrIrE[r8 ()t eof,cEru[s
The 'analytical data indicates that there are noconstituents in this flow which exceed relevantregnrlatory, health and rislc based standards.
IUVESTIOAIIOX PITIITS:
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AITNED
REFERETTCE DOCUUEIII83
Report Septernher 7997
UXr! mrUBERr 252
UXII LOCjAEIOII tf-87
UUIT DE8CRIPIIIOI|: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by Baltimore Air Coil
(BAC) cooling. The discharge is to a storm ditch which
flows to an evaporation/percolation area.
tlAltAGED IIAEES: Industrial Wastewater
llWUlL YOLUIIE DISCENCED3 79,000 gallons
OPERISfOIIAL DATESS l{ay 1962 to Present
PREVTOU8 IIwESAICArIOf,g3
Analytical data is available for sanpling events dated
OL-29-87 and 05-17-88 in the report titled ThiokoT
Corporation Ground Water oualLty Proteetion RegortW.
Rtt RECOto[EttDATrOnS 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
corETISUElrrg otr coxcERlts
The level of dissolved solids exceedE the uiniurun ofthe standard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regrulatory, Health and Risk BaEed Standards) , but doesnot exceed the maxinun leveL for disEolved solids in
Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at Thlokol).
IIIYESEIeAIIOU Elltr83 NO FITRTHER AqffON IS PLANNED
RETEREf,CE DOCUITEUITs 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectLonRePort Septenber 7997
mtrtr uIilBERs 253, 429
.ITUIT LOCAIfOX: U-111
UItIf DEgCRfPTIOIts Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by Baltinore Air coil
(BAc) cooling, boiler condensate, and once-throughcooling. The discharge is to an industrial drain whichflows to an evaporation/percolation area.
IIAIIACED IAglES: fndustrial Wastewater
ANNUAL VOLUUE DISCEARGEDe L,693 ,000 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIT DATES: November 1981 to Present
PRBYIOU8 ftwEgAICAAfOlt8 3
Analytical data is available for sanpling events dated
O2-O9-87 and 04-20-88 in the report titled Thiokol
Corporation Ground Water Ouality Protection Rercrt
September 7997.
RFe RECOuilEttDArrOf,S s
Initiate a sampling progran to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
colt8lrrEuE[![g or cottcRn!
The level of dissolved solids exceedE the minimum ofthe standard levels shovn in Table 1 (Relevant
Regrulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards) , but doesnot exceed the maxiuun level for dlssolved solids in
Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at Ttriokol).
ITTVESTIGATIOTT PLETTS 3
REFEREUCE DOCIII{EI|II8 :
NO FT'RTHER AETION TS PI,AT{NED
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualltv Proteetl,on
Report. Septenber 7997
IINIT ilUUBERs 254
UlfIT LOEAEIOII }I-117
UIIII DEBCRIPIfOI: Surface l{ater Discharge and Old Dr]rwe1l
Location
Surface water discharge generated by Baltl.nore Air Coil
(BAc) cooling, boiler condensate, boiler blowdown, and
a water softener. The discharge formerly was to adrlmell and then to the ground surface forevaporation/percolation. The dr1mell was removed forthiE Eite in 1988.
T{.AITAGED WAgtrE8:Industrial Wastewater
NtlfUAIr VOL,ITUE DI8CEARGED: 9OO r 00O gallons
OPERATIONAf,, DATEE:1960s - Present
PREVTOITS rltVEgrIOe[rON8 :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
01-30-87, 04-17-88 and 11-17-88 in the report titledThiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport, September 1991.
RFA RECOUUETTDATIONE:
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSSITUETTTS OT CONCERN:
rITVESTTGATIOil PLILT{8 :
Antimony, and pH
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge Soil Sarnplinq PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCUUEIIT8 s
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
UlWtr I$U]IBEB: 255
UIIfI f.OCAtrfOII: U-179N
Uf,If DE8CRfPTIOII: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by Baltinore Air Coil
(BAC) cooling, boiler condensate, once-through cooling
and plaster washdown. The discharge is to anindustrial drain which flows to an
evaporation/percolation area.
I,IAIIAGED fAgTES: Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAL VOT UUE DISCEARGED: 190, 000 gallons
OPERITIOXAL DATES: November 1980 to Present
DBEVIOU8 IITVE8TTGAIIOf,E :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
01-30-87 and 04-12-88 in the report titled ThLokol
Corporation Ground Water oualLty Protection RePort.W.
nat REco[tiEttDASrottS :
fnitiate a sampling progran to assure no hazardous
constituents are eEcaping proper disposal.
corsrlruEmS 0t cotlcERtl:
The levels of sulfates and dissolved solids exceed the
nininun of the standard levels shown in Table 1
(Relevant Regulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards) ,but do not exceed the naxinun level for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol).
TTTVESTICATTOII PITITTS :NO FURTHER ACTION TS PI,AIINED
RETERETCE DOCIIT{EITTS g
Th!,okol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionReoort Septenbe,r 7997
UNIIE NUI{BER: 256, 431
urIS Locjl8rotr3 lf-L79sE
UXIA DEBCBIPIIOXs Surface Water Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by boiler condensate
and once-through eooling. The discharge is to anindustrial drain which flows to an
evaporation/percolation area.
I{AIIAGED fAgfES: fndustrial Wastewater
AIIITUAL VOLUIIE Df8CEARGED: 298, O0O gallons
OPERAIfONAIT DAIES: November 1980 to Present
PREVIOUS TTTVESTTGAIION8 :
Anal1rt,ical data is available for saupllng events dated
O2-O2-87 and 05-25-88 in the report titled Thiokol
CorgoratLon Ground Water ouality Protect,ton Report-
Septenber 7997.
REcolIllEltDAIIOf,S 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETTTS OF
There are no constituents which exceed the ninimum ofthe standard levels shosn in Table 1 (Relevant
RegulatoEy, Health and Risk BaEed Standards), or exceedthe surface water and ground water quality levels shownin Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
Thiokol) .
IIwE8TfGATIOIS PITAIIB :
REFERETTCE DOCI'UETTTS :
NO FT,RTHER ACTTON TS PI,AI.INED
Thiokol Corgcration Ground Water Ouality Protection
Report. Seotenber 1997
UNIT IITII{BER: 257
.t NIT IJOCATION: lf-14N
IINIS DE8CRIPTfON: Surface Wafficharse
Surface water discharge generated by boller blowdown,boiler condensate, and a water softener. The dischargeis to a spill protection pond and from there flows intoa storm ditch to an evaporation/percolation area.
I(NIAGED xlgEES: fndustrial Wastewater
ANNUAIJ VOIrIrltE DI8CEARGEDS L7 O,0O0 gallons
OPBRAUONAL, DAIES: December L957 to Present
PREVIOU8 IIwE8rICAEION8 3
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
OL-29-87 and 04-12-88 in the report titled Thiokol
Cornoration Ground Water oualitv Protection Report,
September 1991
RFA REcollllEltDAIIONg s
fnitiate a sampling prograu to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TIEUENIS OF COI{CERII: Thalliun and pH
INVESIIGATIOII Plaac:
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge Soil Samplinq Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'UENT8:
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualLtv ProtectLon
Reoort, September 1991
I'NIT NT'UBER: 258
IINIT ITOCAIIfOII: U-3 3C
IINIT DE8CRIPTfON: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by boiler blowdown
and boiler condensate. The discharge is to anindustrial ditch which flows to an
evaporation/percolation area .
IIAIIAGED fA8[88: Industrial
AI{![UAI, VOITITUE DI8CEARGED :
Wastewater
804,O00 gallons
OPERATIONAL DATE8S November 1981 to Present
PBEVIOUS INVESTTGAIIONS 3
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
02-06-87 and 04-19-88 in the report titled Thiokol
Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection Report,
September 1991.
RFA RECOllilEltDArIOilS 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONS'[IIUEillrg Of COttCERil3 Antinony and pH
IIVEsTTGAEIOI{ PLAN8S
- This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharqe Soil Samplincr PIan for the constituents of
concern.
RETERENCE DOCUUEIITS!
Thiokol Cornoration Ground Water ouality Protectl.on
Report, Septenber 1991
T'NIT NT'UBER: 259
UNIT ITOCATfOf,: ![-538
UNIT DE8CRfPUONs Surface Water Discharcle
Surface water discharge generated by once-throughcooling, parts rinse, and buildlng washdown. The
discharge is to a surface ditch which flows to an
evaporation/percolation area.
I{,AIIAGED fAgTES: fndustrial Wastewater
AIMUAL VOI'III{E Df8CEARGED: 46,000 gallons
OPERATfONAIT DATEE: January 1986 to Present
PREVIOUS TITVESrIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for sampllng eventg dated
O2-O9-87, 05-10-88 and O5-19-88 in the report tltledThiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
a
RFA RECOIIIIEITDAIIION8 3
rnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUETTtr8 OF CONCERN:
rIwE8TIGATIODI PIrAIIS :
Volatile organics
This site will be investigated accordl.ng to the Surface
Discharge Soil Samnlincr PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFEREITCE DOCI'UEITI8S
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualLtv Protection
Report, September 1991
O uxrr NITuBER: zlo
IINIT f.,OCA![fOtl !{-538P
IrNIT DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by laboratory sinks,
BAC cooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge Lsto a surface drainage ditch which flows to an
evaporation/percolation area.
t{llIAcED fegEBS: Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAIJ VOLUIiE DI8CEABGEDS 5O2,000 gallons
OPERAIIOIIAE DATEE: 1960s to Present
PREVIOUS NTVESAIGAIIONS 3
Analytical data is available for sanpling events dated02-06-87, 04-18-88, 05-10-88, and OL-24-9L in thereport titled Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitvProtection Report, September 1991.
RFA REcouliEltDA[IOltg i
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONStrIIUEIII8 OF CONCERII: Vo1atile organics, nis(2-
ethylhexyl) Phthalate, mercury,
nitrobenzene, and pH
IlWEBArceIfOf, PLAI{8 3
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharcre Soil Samplino PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'IiENE83
Thiokol Cornoration Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport. September 1991
O uNrr NrruBER: z6L, 433
IrNIr LOCAtrrOX: !{-67
IINIT DESCRIPTIONs Surface Water Dissharqe
Surface water discharge generated by BAC cooling,boiler condensate, once-through cooling and ultrasonic
coupling water. The discharge is to a storm dltchwhich flows to an evaporation/percolation area.
tiAltAcED fegABS: Industrial Wastewater
AmruAIr volrlruE DISCEARGEDs 55,7OO gallons
OPERIAIOIIIIT DA![Egr June 1960 to Present
PREVTOUS NNTESTIGAATONS :
Analytical data is available for sampling evente dated
O2-O5-87 and 05-17-88 in the report titled Thiokol
Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection Report,
Septenber 1991.
RFA RECOUI{ENDAUONS:
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TIIUENIB OF COXCERII: Lead and pH
IITVESTIGAIIOil PLANS 3
Thlg slte will be investigated according to tlre Surface
Discharge Soil Saurplino Plan for the constltuents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCT'ITENTS S
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report. September 1991
O uNrr NITuBER: 263
'UNf T ITOCITIOII: !{-7 2
IrNIT DE8CRIPTIOII: Surface Water_Dissharse
Surface water discharge generated by boiler blowdown,
BAC cooling, boiler condensate, Iaboratory sinlcs and auater softener. The discharge is to a storn ditchwhich flows to an evaporation/percolation area.
I.IAI{AGED fAglIEE: Industrial Wastewater
ANNITAIT VOLUIIE DISCEIRGEDS 277 ,400 gallons
OPERATIOIIAL DAIESS June 1950 to Present
PREVTOUS NTVE8TIGATIONS !
Analytical data is available for sampling eventE dated
OL-29-87, 05-24-88 and 01-24-91 in the report titledThiokol Corooration Ground Water ouality ProtectLonReport, September 1991
RFA RECOtdllEltDAIIOltg 3
fnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8IITUEIITB Of CONCERII: Lead and pH
IITVE8IIGAIfON PI.tA}f83
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge Soil Samolincr PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'I{EITE8 :
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport. Septenber 1991
O uurr NrrrdBER: 264
IrNf T IrOCI\trfON3 !{- 64L
IINIT DE8CRIPTfON: Surface Water Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by once-throughcooling and boiler condensate. The discharge iEdispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates / percolates .
IIAIIAGED fAgEBS: Industrial Wastewater
AI{I{UAIr VOIrIrl[E DISCEIRGED3 105, 000 gallons
OPERIIIIONIIT DefES: November 1962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESIIGAIIIONS s
Analytical data is available for sanpling events dated
O2-O3-87 and 05-12-88 in the report titled Thlokol
Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection Reoort,
September 1991.
RFA RECO}T}TEITDASIONE 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8[IIUEN![8 Of CONCERII3 pH
MVE8TIGAIION PIreNS 3
Thls site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharqe Soil Samoling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
IrtrI8 mruBEBs 265
UtIf LoC:lrfOX. !ll-642
IIUIE DE8CBIP|!IOI[: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by once-through
cooling and boiler condensate. The discharge is
dispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates / perco lates .
IIAIIACED flSSEBs Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAIT VOITUUE Df8CEIRGED: 23,000 gallons
OPERAlIIONIL DAtrES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS ITTVE8TTGATIONS :
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated
02-03-87 in the report titled Thiokol Corpnration
Ground Water Oualitv Ptotection Reoort. Seotember 7997.
RfA RECOIIIIEIIDAIfON8 s
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COTSSISUEIIII8 OI COIICERI|:
There are no constituents which exceed the ninimun ofthe standard levels shown in Tab1e 1 (Relevant
Regu1atory, Health and Risk Based Standards) , or exceedthe surface vater and ground water quality leve1s shownln Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
Thiokol) .
I}IVESTICATTON PIrATIS :
REFEREITCE DOCUTIETTTS 3
NO FT'RTHER AqTION TS PI,AI{NED.
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectionReport. Septenber 7997
TINIT NTIUBER: 266
UNIT LOCASIOT: S-501
IINIT DESCRIPTION: Surface Water Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by boiler condensate.
The discharge is to the ground surface where it
evaporates /percolates .
uANecED fegfEs: Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAL VOITITUE DISCEARGED3 11,000 gallons
OPERAIrIONaL DA![E8: November L962 to Present
PREVTOUS I}IVESTIGEAIONS !
Analytical data is available for saupling events dated
O2-O2-87 and 05-17-88 in the report tltled Thlokol
Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection Renort,
@.
RFA RECOUUENDATIOI{8I
fnitiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTIEUEII!!8 OF CONCERIIs pH
I}{VE8IIGATIOI| DLAI{8 :
This site will be investigated accordlng to the Surface
Discharqe Soil Sanplinq PIan for the constituentE of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCIII.TENtr8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv Protection
Report, September 1991
I,NIT NI,UBER: 267
UNf![ IJOCATIOII: A-9 (fomerly known as A-4)
t NItr DEgCRfPTfONs Surface l{ater Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by boiler blowdown,boiler condensate, BAC cooling and a water softener.
The discharge is to a drainage ditch which flowE into
an impoundment area where it evaporates/percolates.
IIANAGED IA8EES: fndustrial Wastewater
ANNUAIT VOLITUE DISCEARGED: 1, 510, OOO gallons
OPERAIIIONAIT DA![88: August 1985 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESIIGAIIION8 3
Analytical data is available for sanpllng events dated
O2-L2-87 and 04-17-88 in the report titled Thlokol
Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection Report,
September 1991.
RTA RECOUIIEITDATTON8 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TITUEIIE8 Of CONCERN3 Cadmium, chromium, sllver, lead and pH
INVEStrTGATIOU PLAIS 3
This Eite will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge Soil Samplinq Plan for the constl.tuents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCIMEilTS 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouallty Protection
Report. September 1991
O rrNrr NITITBER: 26s
,[rNf'[ LOCAIIOX: M-8
IINIT DESCRIPTION: Surface l{ater Discharcte
Surface water discharge grenerated by boiler condensate,
BAC cooling, sand mandrel wash, eyewash, once-throughcooling and a floor wash. The discharge is to aninduEtrial line which flows into an impoundment area
where it evaporates/percolates.
ItAttAcED fAgllES: Industrial Wastewater
AlIltUAIr VOLImE DISCEARGED3 2o4,000 gallons
OPERAIIIOIIAII DA[88: December 1957 to Present
PREVIOI'8 IIrVESAIGAIIONS 3
Analytical data is available for sampling eventE dated
O2-L2-87 and 05-o4-88 in the report titled Thlokol
Cornoration Ground Water oualitv Protection Report,'
@.
RFA RECOI,IITEITDAIIONS 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
. CONSTITUENI8 OF CONCERIT: LeAd
INVESIIGAAIOil Pr,ilts s
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharqe Soil Sanpling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERBNCE DOCUIIENESs
Thiokol Corooration Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, Seotember 1991
IrNIT NITUBER: 269, 4O9, 6L2
IrNfT IJOCATfOil: I{-10
t NIT DE8CRIPUONs Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by boiler blowdown,boiler condensate, BAC cooling, and a water softener.
The discharge is to an industrial line which flows intoan inpoundment area where it evaporates/percolates.
I,I,AIIAGED WA8TES: Industrial Wastewater
A![.UAL VOITUI{E DISCEARGED: 236,000 gallons
OPERATfON1IT DATEE:December L957 to Present
PREVTOU8 IITVESTTCATIONS :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
O2-O5-87 and 04-19-88 in the report titled rhiokol
Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection Report,
September 1991.
RFA RECOI{ITENDAIIION8 :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETUI8 OF CONCERT{:
MVESTIGAEION ir,Afr8:
Antimony and pH
This site will be investigated according to the EgflggeDischarge Soil Sanpling PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFEREDTCE DOCINiENES 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport, Seotember 1991
O uNrr NrrlrBER: 27o
IrNItr LOCeIIOf,: U-14S
UilIA DE8CBIPAIOXs Surface Water DLscharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltiuore AlrColl (BAC) cooling process. The discharge is to aspill protection pond and from there flows into a stormditch to an evaporation/percolation area.
I{AXAOED f,eATE8: Industrial Wastewater
ANNUAIT VOITUIIE DISCEIRGBDS 7OO,000 gallons
OPERe8IOltlIr DATBE: December L957 to Present
PREVIOI'8 IITVESTTGAITON8 :
Analytical data is available for sampling evente dated
01-30-87 and 04-12-88 in the report titled Thlokol
Corporation Ground Water Oualitv Protection Report,
@.
RTA RECOI{IIENDAEION8 3
Initiate a sanpling progran to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TMUEIIII8 Otr CONCERIIS pH
INVESTIGUIOIT PLATTS:
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Dl.scharcre Soil Samplinq Plan for the constituentE of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCT'IIEIIII8 :
Thlokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv Protectlon
Report. September 1991
T'NIT NT'T,TBER: 27L
IrNII ITOCAIION: !{-576N
IrNIT DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by boiler blowdown,boiler condensate and an eyeuash station.
IiAIIAGED fAgIES3 Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAL VOIJIilE DISCEARGED: 249,000 gallons
OPERAIIOIIAL DAlfES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESAIGAEIONS !
Analytical data is available for sampling eventE dated01-30-87, and 04-11-88 in the report titled Thlokol
Corporation Ground Water Ouality Protection Report,
September 1991.
RFA RECOI,II,IENDATIONB :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTX|IUEIIES Otr CONCERII: Lead and pH
IITVESTIGETIOX PLITIS 3
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharcre SoiI Samolinq Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFBREI'.E Doclnri*" t
Thiokol Corooration Ground Water ouality ProtectLonReport, September 1991
O lrnrr NuIIEER: 272
UXIE LOCABIO!|I U-576S
uttll[ DEBcRIPIIoxs BAC coollncr Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltimore AirCoil (BAC) and a water softener.
ItAttAGED IA8AES: Industrial Wastewater
ANltUlIr VOLUIIE DI8CEIRCED3 6,286, 000 gallons
OPERIIIOIIAL DATEgt November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESEIGAAIONS 3
Analyt,tcal data is available for a sanpling event dated
04-11-88 in the report titled Thiokol CorporatLon
Ground ftlater Ouality Protection Report. Segteaber 7997.
RFA BECOrlriEltDAEIOf,E :
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
corSrlruEtrllg o, corcERlts
The leve1s of aluminum, iron and dissolved solids
exceed the ninimum of the standard leve1s shown in
Table 1 (Relevant Regulatory, IIeaIth and Risk Based
Standarde), but do not exceed the maximun level for the
respective constituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground
Water Quality at Thiokol) . Aluminum and iron are
regrulated only as Secondary Maxinun Contaminant Levels,
and the level for aluninrul is only proposed at thistLne. The concentrations of aluuinun and iron in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of these conEtituent
found in surface water at Thiokol, and the
concentration of dissolved solids does not exceed thelevel of dissolved solids in either the Eurface or the' ground water.
O rtryB'rrca'rox pr.,o,rs 3 No FTTRTHER AerroN rs pr,Ar{NED
RETEREf,CE DOCUIIEIIT8 :
ThLokol CorgoratLon Ground Water oualLty Protectl,onReport Septanber 7997
O uNrr NrruBER: 273
UNIA ITOCAAIOIS U-585N
UilIE DEgCRIPllIof,T Laboratorv Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a chemical
Iaboratory operations and once-through cooling. Thediseharge is to a drainage ditch where it
evaporates / percolates .
ITANAGED fABfEg: fndustrial Wastewater
ANIIUAL VOIJITIIE DISCEARGED: 189, OO0 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIT DetrE8: November 1962 to Present
PREVTOUS I}IVESETGATIONE I
Analytical data is available for sampllng events dated
O2-O2-87, 05-05-88, 05-02-88, and 11-16-88 in thereport titled Thiokol Corporation Ground Water OualitvProtection Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOUUENDAEIOITS:
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONS![IEUElttr8 Of CONCERII: Volatile Organics
INVESAIOAIIOT PLIITSS
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
DLscharge Soil Sanplinq Plan for the constltuents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'UBNT8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground l[ater oualitv ProtectionReport. September 1991
T,NIT NT,UBER: 274
IINIT ITOCAIfON: l[-593
IINII DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharcle
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BACcooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is to a
storm system where it evaporates/percolates.
IiAIIAGED fAATEgr Industrial lilastewater
AIIIIUAIT VOLUIIE DISCEARGED! 29O,000 gallons
OPERAIIIOIIAII DAIES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS I}IVESIIIGArIONS 3
Analytical data is available for sampllng eventE dated
O2-O3-87, 04-24-88, and 01-25-91 in the report tltledThiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv Protection
a
RFA RECOUI{ENDAIIOTS t
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONS!!IIUE![B8 OF CONCERII: antimony
ITTVESTIGITIOIT PI,}N8 :
Thls site will be investigated acsording to the Surface
Discharge Soil Sanplinq PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFEREnCE Doerniinr"t
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectionReport, September 1991
O uurr rIuuBER: 27s
UNItr LOeATfOt: l{-600
mtlll DE8CRIPAIOX! BAC Coolincl Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore Aircoil (BAc) cooling process. The discharge is dispersed
onto the ground surface where it evaporates/percolates.
lilltAcED IIA![88: Industridl l{asteuater
AtrltUllr VOITUIIE DISCEIBCED3 29O,00O gallons
OPERAIIOIIAL DAIES! November L962 to Present
PREVIoU8 ItwEg![IeArIONg 3
Analyt,ical data is available for a sanpling event dated
02-03-87 in the report titled Thiokol CorporatLon
Ground Water Ouality Prot .
RrA RECOtlllEttDAffOXg 3
Initiate a sanpling progrram to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
cof,8rr8uENr8 (,t cof,cERtt:
There are no constituents which exceed the ninimum ofthe standard leve1s shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regnrlatory, Health and Risk Based Standards), or exceedthe surface water and ground water quality levels shownin Tab1e 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
Thiokol) .
ITVESTTGAIIOf, DITATS: NO FIJRTHER ACTION IS PI,AIINED.
RETEREtrCE DOCI'UEII.I8 :
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouall.ty ProtectLonReport Septertuer 7997
O urrr NrrrdBER: 276
UIII.|I I.OCATIOII: tf-601
UilIf DESCRIPTIOf,: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BAC
coolJ.ng, and boiler condensate. The discharge iEdispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates /perco lates .
IIAXACED IlafEg: fndustrial Wastewater
AI{!IUAIr VOr.IIllE DISCEN,CEDS 2O5,000 gallons
OPERAEIOIIAL DAIES: November 1962 to Present
PBEVIOUS IITVESITGAIrIONS :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
02-03-87 and 04-24-88 in the report titled ThiokolCorporation Ground Water oualitv ProteetLon ReoortSeotefuer 7997.
Rm REeOlIttEttDtTIOtrs 3
Initiate a sanpling progrram to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
couSrIEIrEltES ()r coucEnil:
The -l.evel of aluminun exceeds the nininun of thestandard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant Regfulatory,Health and Risk Based Standards), but doee not exceedthe maximun level for aluninum ln Table 2 (Surface and
Ground Water guality at Thiokol) .
rIIVE8AIGETIOX PTrN[8S NO TURTIIER ACTTON TS PIJAT.INED.
REtrEREITCE DOCUTIEIES 3
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectLonReport Septenber 7997
TINIT NT,IITBER: 277
IINIT ITOCATIOf,I U-629
T,NIT DESCRTPTIOf,: SurfACE
Surface water discharge generated by a drinkingfountain. Cooling condensate fron anmoniun perchlorate
grinding may possibly drain in an emergency. This flowis incidental and no discharge waE not found during the
RFA.
T{.A}IAGED TA8TE8:
Potable water discharge
OPERAIIOf,AL DAIESI
November L962 to Present
RFE RECOIOTEIIDAAIOUS 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
ITVESIIGATIOT PT.IT8 3
The flow is very ninimal and the only operations in thebuilding are ammonium perchlorate grinding. Ammoniumperchlorate is not a listed waEte and is only hazardousin concentrations that are ignitable.
NO FIJRTHER ACTION IS WARRAITTED.
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
O rrrrr NITuBER: z7B
uur8 Loetrlrolss u-639
Uf,I,|! DE8CBIPEIOII3 Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by once-through
cooling and boiler condensate. The discharge is
dispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates / perco lates .
IIAIIACED IAAAES: Industrial Wastewater
eilfuA& volrlllrE DrEeEmcEDs 42,OOO gallons
OPERIIIOIIAL DAIES: November L962 to Present
PREVTOUS IITVEETIGAATOUS 3
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
O2-O3-87 in the report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection Regort- September 7997.
RrA RECOmiEltDAllrOilS s
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coxSrlluEllllg ol cotrcERils
There are no constituents which exceed the niniuum of
the standard levels shown in Table 1 (Re1evant
Regulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards) , or exceedthe surface water and ground water quality IeveIE shownin Tab1e 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
Thiokol) .
rUYEEIICATTOTT PT.ATS 3 NO FT,RTHER AEIION IS PI,AI{NED.
REFENEf,CE DOCU!|EITE8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProteetLonReport Septenber 7997
I'NItr NI'IIBERS 285
IrNIT L,OCAIIIOXs !{-570
ultlI DEgcRIPIIolti BAC Coolinq Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore Al,r Coll(BAC) cooling process and a water softener. Thedischarge is to a drainage channel where the water
evaporates / percolates .
ITANAGED IABIES: Industrial Wastewater
IXNUAIJ VOIJITIiE DISCEARGED3 1, 480, 000 gallons
OPERAIIIONIIT DIIES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IMTESTIGATTONS :
Analytical data is available for sanpling events dated
O2-L2-87, 05-24-88, 11-16-88 in the report tltled ThlokolCorporation Ground Water ouality Protection Report,
September 1991.
RFA RECOI,TUENDAEIONS S
Initiate a sampling program to aasure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
cON8l'IflrENTg Otr cotlcERlts Cyanide
IIIVE8IICAIION Pfrlltg 3
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharcre SoiI Sarnplinq PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCT'IiEITTSS
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualltv ProtectLon
Report, September 1991
UNIT NT,}TBER: 286
t NIT ITOCATfONI !{-z0s
T'NII DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharcre
surface water discharge generated by boiler condensate,boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a water softener. The
discharge is to a surface ditch where it is dispersedinto an evaporation/percolation area.
}T,AIIAGED IIA8TES:fndustrial Wastewater
AIMUAIT VOITITUE Df8CEARGED: 277,400 gallons
OPERATfONAL DATEE:December 1959 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTIGAATONS 3
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
O1-3O-87, 05-11-88 and 11-15-88 in the report titledThiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv ProtectionReport, Seotember 1991.
RFA RECOT{UETTDATIONE :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TITUEITT8 OF CONCERN:
IITVESTIGATION PLATTS :
Cyanide, lead and pH
This site wiII be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge Soil Sannlinq PIan for the constituentE of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI,IdENTS 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report. September 1991
O rrNrr NrruBER: 2s7
IINIT ITOCATfOII3 T-64
T,NIT DE8CRTPTTOII: SUTfACE
Surface water discharge generated by boiler condensate,boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a water softener. The
discharge is to a surface ditch where it
evaporates / perco lates .
lIAtrAcED fAglEE: Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIT VOIrIrl[E DISCEARGED: 95, O00 gallons
OPERATIONAIJ DATESS 1980 tO PTESENt
PREVIOUS IITVESIIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
01-30-87 and 05-11-88 in the report titled Thiokol
Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection Report,
@.
REA RBCOUIIEIIDAIrOil8 3
Initiate a sampling progran to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTIEUETUT8 OF CONCERN:pH
MVESIIGA8IOX Plrll[8:
This site will be investigated accordlng to the Surface
Discharqe Soil Saurpling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
RETERENCE DOCIruENTS 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
UTIT f,UIIEER: 345
Irf,Ir f.OCIAIOII !I-14
UtIf DESCRIPUOX: Surface Water Discharqe Collection Pond
This unit consists of a collection pond for the surface
discharge generated by building U-14. This pond
functions as a spill protection pond and from here the
wastewater flows via a storm ditch to an
evaporation/percolation area. The discharges frombuilding !,t-14 are covered by SI{UU Nos. 257 and 27O.
IiIIIAGED fASSEgs Industrial lilastewater
ANNUAL VOLUIIE Df8CEIRGEDS 87O,00O gallons
' OPERAIIIOIIIIT Dl:[88! L957 to Present
PREvIoUg IIwE8rIGAAIOf,g !
Analytical data is available for saupling events forboth flows covered by SWUU Nos. 257 and 270 in thereport titled Thl,okol Corporation Ground Water Ouality
ProtectLon RetrErt Septenber 7997.
RTA RECOIiIiEITDATIOXS S
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
INVESIICATIOX PI.EN8 s
The analytical data for the discharges under SIIUU Nos.
257 and 27O indicate that the levels of aluninun, iron,seleniun, nitrates and dissolved sollds exceed relevantregulatory, health and risk based standards, but do not
exceed the levels for these constituents in the surface
and ground water at Thiokol.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,A}INED.
REFERENCE DOCUUETITS:
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
05 JuIy L992
Thl,okol Corporation Ground Water oualLty Protectlon
Report. Septenber 7997
o
IINIT NTIMBER: 357
IINIT LOCATION: E- 519
IINIT DESCRIPTION: Buildinq Discharqe
Building discharge generat,ed by an office building.
The discharge is to an indust,rial line which dischargesto BIue Creek under a UPDES Permit.
IIA}IAGED DTASTES:Industrial WasLewater
AIINUAIT VOITIIME DISCH,ARGED :Not, available
OPERATIONAI, DATES:1998 to Present,
PRT\IIOUS IIWESTIGATIONS :
The drainage area which received Ehe wastewaEer fromthis discharge prior to 1989, has been invest,igat,ed
under the U.S. Air Force Installation and Restoration
Program (IRP) . Work on the siE,e has included soil
sampling, ground wat,er sampling, and geophysical
suryeys. Results of t,hese invest,igat,ions are det,ailedin t,he report t,itled InstaTTation Restoration Proqran -
U.S. Air Foree PTartt 78.
RFA RECOUIIEIIDATIONS :
InitiaE,e a sampling program to assure no hazardous
consE,ituent,s are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTT'ENTS OF CONCERN:
IIIVESTIGATION PIrAtilS :
Refer to IRP Report,s
Any further invesLigaEion aE this site will be
conduct,ed. under the IRP.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PIJAIiINED AS PART OF THE RFI.
REFERINCE DOCTIMEMTS:
InstaTTation Restoration Proqran - U,S. Air Force PTant
UNIT ISUUBER: 358, 359
IrilfB f.OCAffOf,: lf-113
IrXfT DE8CRIPTfOI: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by Baltinore Alr coil
(BAC) cooling, boiler condensate, stean wash rack and ahydroclave. The discharge is to an industrial drain
which flows to an evaporation/percolation area.
IdAf,AGED Ilgl[ES: fndustrial Wastewater
eltttuAl VOLUIIE DfgCEmcEDs 3O7,30O gallons
OPERITfOIIII DAEES: Prior to t962 to Present
PREVIOU8 IIwE8IIICA|IION8 3
Analyt,ical data is available for sanpling events dated
O2-O9-87 and 04-20-88 in the report titled ThiokolCorporation Ground Water Ouality Protection Report.W.
Rtra nEcou[EttDAt[roI8 :
Initiate a sanpling prograu to assure no hazardousconEtituents are eEcaping proper disposal.
CON8AITUEIIII8 Ol COltCERIIs
The .levels of aluminum, iron and dissolved solids
exceed the ninimum of the Etandard levels shown in
Sab1e 1 (Relevant Regulatory, llealtlr and Risk BasedStandards), but do not exceed the maxinurn level for the
respective constituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground
Water Quality at Thiokol). Aluninun and iron areregulated only as Secondary ltaximun Contaminant Levels,
and the level for aluninum is only proposed at thistime. The concentrations of aluninum in thiE discharge
does not exceed the level found in surface water atThiokol, and the concentrations of iron and dissolvedsolids do not exceed the levels found in both surface
and ground water.
ITVESTTGATTOI PLIXSS NO FT,RTHER AEIION IS PI.A}INED
.BEIERETCE DOCUXEUTS:
Thl-okol Corppration Ground Water ouality ProteetionReport Septenber 7997
I'NIT NT'UBER: 360
IrNfT ITOCITIOII: !{-L97BP
IINIT DE8CRIPTIONs Surface Water-lDischarqe
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore AirCoil (BAC) cooling process. The discharge is to a
surface ditch which flows to an evaporation/percolation
area.
IIAIIAGED f,AaIE8: fndustrial Wastewater
ANNUAL, VOITUIIE DISCEARGEDS <5O0, 00O gallons
OPERATIONIL DAIES3 l{ay 1988 to Present
PREVIOU8 IIwBSIIGAIIOil8 3
Analytical data is available for sanpling events dated
O2-O2-87 and 05-25-88 in the report titled Thiokol
Corporation Ground I{ater Ouality Protection Report,
September 1991.
RFE RECOU}iE}TDATIONS :
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSIITUEIIT8 Of CONCERII! Volatile organics and pH
ftIVEgTIGAtrION PfrDNSs
This site will be investigated according to the EgflrcDischarcre Soil Sarnpling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
RETERENCB DOCUUEITE83
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
ReBort, Septenber 1991
I,NTT TTUT{BER: 3 63
Irf,IT LOClffOf,: l{-594
UItI'f DE8CRIPEIOII: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BACcooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is to a
storm system where it evaporates/percolates.
ItAltAcED Il8![E8: Industrial Wastewater
ANNUAIT YOLUIIE DISCEARGED: 29O,0O0 gallons
OPERAIIOIIIL DATES: November L962 to Present
PREilTOU8 IITVESEIGAAIOUS 3
Analytical data is not available for this specificuniti however, the wastewater flow from this source issubstantially identical to other casting building
discharges which have analytical sanpling dataavailable. The report titled Thtokol Corporatlon
Ground Water Ouality Protection Regort. September 7997
contains a summary of the average casting building
waEtewater effluent concentrations.
Rra REeouuEuDaErof,Ss
Initiate a sampling progrram to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
cottS8lltuEtll!8 Ol COltCEnIIs
The leve1s of aluninun and dissolved Eolids exceed the
nininun of the standard levels shosn in Table 1
(Relevant Regulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards),but do not exceed the maximun leve1 for the respectiveconstituents in Tab1e 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluminurn is regulated only as
Secondary Maxinum Contaminant Level, and the level for
aluminum is only proposed at this time. The
concentrations of aluminum and dissolved solids ln this
diseharge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol.
ITTVESIIGATTOil PLIITs :NO FTIRTHER ACTTON IS PI,ANNED.
REFEREUCE DOCITI,IEISIS s
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report. Seotenber 7997
I,TITT IIUUBER,: 364
IrNfT ITOCATIOX: U-598
tNIT DEgCRfPTfOt: Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge lrenerated by cast pit wash, BAccooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is
dispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates /perco lates .
T{ATTAGED TA8TE8:Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAIT VOT UIIE DISCEARGED: 29O, 000 gallons
OPERATIOIIA& DAfEgs November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS TTTVESTTGAIIIOTI8 :
Analytical data is not available for this specificunit; however, the wastewater flos from this source issubstantially identical to other casting building
discharges which have analyt,ical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection Report September 7997
contains a summary of the average casting building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RECOUUEITDAIIrOf,8 3
Initiate a sanpling progran to asaure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
COTIStrIAUETIT8 OF CONCERTI:
The levels of aluminum and dissolved solids exceed the
nininum of the standard levels shown in Table 1
(Relevant Regulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards),but do not exceed the maximum level for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluminum is regulated only as
Secondary Maxinum Contaminant Level, and the leve1 for
aluminum is only proposed at this time. The
concentrations of aluninurn and disEolved solids in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol .
. IUTfEgEIeA'ffOf PIeltB :
REtrERETCE DOCUT{ETItrS S
NO FT'RTHER A TTON TS PI,ANNED.
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water OuaTity ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
I,TTIT TTUUBER,: 3 55
UItIf LOC]ISfOII: U- 602
UNI8 DE8CRIPIIOIg Surface Water Discharge
Surface uater discharge generated by cast pit wash, BACcooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is
dispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates / percolates .
TTATTAGED TA8TE8:fndustrial Wastewater
AIIITUAL VOLUIIE Df8CEIRGED: 274,O0O gallons
OPBRAIIOITAL DAIEE:November L962 to Present
PREVTOUS IMTESSICAEIOI{8 :
Analytical data is not available for this specificuniti however, the wastewater flow from this source issubstantially identical to other casting building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol CorporatLon
Ground Water Ouality ProtectLon Report. Septenber 7997
containE a summary of the average casting building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOIIITEITDASIOXS S
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
cottSEr[uElt![8 0, cottcERtt3
The levelE of aluninun and disEolved solidE exceed the
ninimun of the standard levels shown in Table 1
(Relevant Regul.atory, Health and Risk Based Standards),but do not exceed the maxinun level for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluninum is regulated only as
Secondary Maxinum Contaminant L,evel, and the level foraluninun is only proposed at this time. The
concentrations of aluminum and dissolved solids in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in surface or grround water at
Thiokol.
IITVESIICIIIOI PLIIISS NO FI'RTHER A TTON IS PI,ANNED.
NETEREIrCE DOCI'IIEUES 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv ProtectLon
Repprt. Septenber 1997
O .r*rr NITIIBER: 3G6
UilIf LOCI[fOil: !{-63558
IINIT DESCRTPUONI Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by once-throughcooling, BAC cooling, and boiler condensate. The
discharge is dispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates / perco lates .
lfnXAcED fAgIEgs fndustrial Wastewater
AIlttUA! YOf.UtlE DfSCEARGEDS <37 O, 000 gallons
OPERIIIIOIIII, D1TE83 November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITTESTTGAITION8
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
O2-O4-87 and O4-27-88 in the report titled Thlokol
Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection Regort.
Septenber 7997.
RFA RECOIOIETTDATIOITS :
Initiate a sampJ.ing progran to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper dlsposal.
COf,SIIIUEN'!8 OF COXCEnl[s
There are no constituents which exceed the minimum ofthe standard levelE shown in Table 1 (Relevant
RegrulatoEyr Health and Risk Based Standards), or exceedthe surface water and ground water quality levels shownin Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
Thiokol) .
ITVESTTCAIITOT PLIITS: NO FT'RTHER A TION IS PLAI{NED.
RETEREilCE DOCUUEITTS s
ThLokol Corooration Ground Water Ouality Protection
Report. Septenber 7997
T,NIT NI,T{BER: 367
IrNf T ITOCATIOII: ![- 636SW
IrNfT DEgCRfPTfONs Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a photo rinseprocess and a water softener. The discharge isdispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates /perco lates .
UAilecED fASfEgr Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIr VOITInIE DISCEIRGED8 nOr,, OOO gallons
OPERAIIIOIIAIT DA![Egi November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS TIIVESTIGAETONS s
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
O2-O4-87 and 04-27-88 in the report titled ThlolrolCorporation Ground Water oualitv Protection Report.
@.
RFA RECOUIIEIIDAIIION8 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUETUTS OF CONCERN:Cadmium, chromium, silver and lead
MVESTIGATION PIrAI{8:
This site will
Discharqe Soil be investigated according to the Surface
Samplinq PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCMIEITTS:
Thiokol Conroration Ground lilater ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
I,NIT IIIIT{BER: 37 O
IINIT LOCATIOIT: !{- 694
IINIT DESCRIPTIONs Surface Water Discharcre
Incidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate punp which would drain tothe ground surface only in an emergency.
IIAIIAGED fAg![ES: Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAL VOITIIUE Df 8CEARGED :unknown
to PresentOPERATIOIIAL DATEE: L962
PREIVIOUS ITTVESTIGATTONS g
This flow has not beeninconsistent nature of
sampled because of thethe dischargle.
RTA RECOU}TEITDATIONS :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IITVESIIIGATIOf, PI.A[8!
any discharge from this unit would be in the case of an
emergency situation and there is no indication that the
discharge would contain hazardous constituents.
This'incidental flow is planned to be included for
treatment and disposal under a IIPDES permit at the tinea collection and treatment f,acility is constructed.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI.AIiTNED.
REFEREIICB DOCUITENES I
Thiokol Corgoration Ground Water ouality ProtectionReoort Septenber 7997
Paul Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 Septenber 1991
O uNrr nulrBER: 37L
I,trfT IrOCilSfOfn !f-689
UNI! DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore Aircoil (BAC) cooling procesE. The discharge is to a
storm ditch where it evaporates/percolates.
IIAIIAOED IA8AES: fndustrial Wastewater
Af,XUIL VOLUIIE DISCEIRCED: 2LL,400 gallons
OPERA8fOIIAL DeAEgT November 1962 to Present
PREVIOUS ilwES'TTGAAIONS :
Analyt,ical data is available for a sampling event dated
04-27-88 in the report titled Thiohol CorFnration
Ground Water Ouality Protection Ragort. September 7997.
RAt RECOTIITEIIDArIOXS !
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
colr8TlruElt![8 otr coxcERil3
The levels of aluninun and iron exceed the nininum ofthe standard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regru].atory, Health and Risk Based Standards), but donot exceed the maxinun leve1 for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluminum and iron are req[ulatedonly as Secondary Maxinum Contaminant Levels, and thelevel for aluminum is only proposed at this time. The
concentrations of aluminun and iron in this discharge
do not exceed the levels of these constituent found insurface or ground water at Thiokol.
IIVESAICNIIOT PTAI{83 NO TURTHER AETION IS PI"AI{NED.
o RETERETCE DOCU}IEI|TS :
ThLokol CorporatLon Ground Water oualLty Protectl-on
Repprt. Septenber 7997
INTIE XTIIiBEBT 374
.utMoctrlof r M-585s
UXIA DE8CBIPEIOII! Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by BAC cooling,boiler condensate, and a water softener. The dischargeis to a drainage ditch where lt evaporates/percolates.
IIIXAGED II8IE8: Industrial Wastewater
ailruAII voLullE DTSCEARGED3 2LO,000 gallons
OPERA|IIOUAL DA![E8: Novenber 1962 to Present
PBEXTIOUS IITVESAIGAIIOIT8 S
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event inthe report titled Thiokol CorporatLon Ground Waterouality Protection Report September 7997, but theanalysis was not performed by a certified laboratory.
RFA RECOllllEltDAIIOltS s
Initiate a sampling progran to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal..
COf,SEITUEIII8 or cotlcEmts
The level of dissolved solids exceeds the nininrrn ofthe standard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regu1atory, Health and Risk Based Standards) , but doesnot exceed the maximum level for dissolved solids inTable 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at Thiokol).
IITVESEIGITTOI ELIITS: NO FT'RTIIER AETION IS PIJAITNED.
REFEREUCE DOCT'UEUtr8 !
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectLonReport. Septenber 7997
T,NIT }II,UBER: 375
IrNfT ITOCATfOII lf-62]-
IINIT DE8CRIPTIOIT: Surface Water Discharqe
Incidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate pump, pipe leaks andbuilding washdown. The wastewater from the condensate
punp would drain to the ground surface only in an
emergency, and the wastewater frou pipe leaks andbuilding washdown 'rdaylightsx northwest of thebuilding.
ltAltAGED TA8i[ES: Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAL VOLU}TE DISCEARGEDS unKnown
OPERAIIOIIAL DATE8. L962 to Present
O PREvrous rrwEsrrcATroNB:
This flow has not been sampled because of theinconsistent nature of the discharge.
RFA RECOUIIEIIDA.IION8 !
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IITVESIIIGATION PI.AN8 3
Any deasurable discharge from this unit would be in the
case of an emergency situation and there is noindlcation that the discharge would contain hazardous
constituents.
This incidental flow is planned to be included fortreatment and disposal under a IIPDES pemit at the tinea collection and treatment facillty is constructed.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED.
REtrERENCE DOCI'TIETTIIS :
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September L992
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectLonReport Seotenber 7997
T'NIT IIT'}IBER: 37 6
T,NIT LOCATIOTg I{-622
T'NIT DE8CRfPTION: Surface Water Discharqe
Incidental surface water discharge eonsisting of
wastewater from a condensate pump, pipe leaks andbuilding washdown. The wastewater from the condensate
pump would drain to the ground surface only in an
emerg1ency, and the wastewater from pipe Leaks andbuilding washdown rrdaylightsx west of the building.
T{ATIAGED TA8TE8:Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIT VOITITUB DISCEARGED :unknown
to PresentOPERAITONAI, DATES: L962
PREVTOUS ITTVE8TTGATTONS :
This flow has not been
inconsistent nature of
RtrA RECOUT{ETTDATTONS :
sampled because of thethe dischargle.
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IITVESTIGAIIOT PLllTS s
Any measurable discharge from this unit would be in the
case .of an emergency situation and there is noindication that the discharge would contain hazardous
constituents.
ThiE incidental flow is planned to be included for
treatment and disposal under a IIPDES permit at the tinea colfection and treatment facility iE constructed.
NO FT RTHER ACTION fS PLAI,INED.
RBTERENCE DOCI'IIET'T8 S
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water OualLty Proteetl,onReport Septenber 7997
Paul Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
Incidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate pump, pipe leaks andbuilding washdown. The wastewater from the condensate
pump would drain to the ground surface only in an
emergency, and the wastewater from pipe leaks andbuilding washdown ttdaylightstr southwest of thebuilding.
TT.A}IAGED TASTES:Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAIT VOITITUE DISCEARGED :unknown
to PresentOPERATIONAL DATES: L962
T,NIT TTT,UBER: 377
,UIff T [.OCA[IOI5: U- 623
IINIT DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharse
PREVIOUS TTWESTTGATTONS :
This flow has not beeninconsistent nature of
RFA RECOUUEITDATIONS:
sampled because of thethe discharg e.
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
ITTVESTIGAIIOX PT.AX8:
Any fieasurable discharge from this unit would be in the
case of an emergency situation and there is noindication that the discharge would contain hazardousconstituents.
This incidental flow is planned to be included fortreatment and disposal under a UPDES pernit at the tinea collection and treatment facility is constructed.
NO FT'RTTIER ASTION IS PI,AIINED.
REFERETICE DOCI'UETTtr8 :
Paul Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
Thl,okol Corppration Ground Water Ouality ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
T'NIT NT'UBER: 381
UNfT LOCIIION: !{-640
IINIT DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by once-throughcooling and boiler condensate. The discharge Ledispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates / percolates .
T{.AIIAGED f,ASTE8:Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAL VOITITIIE Df8CEARGED: 46,000 gallons
OPERATIONAIJ DATES:November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESIIIGATIONS !
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated
05-12-88 in the report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water oualitv Protection ReBort, September 1991.
RFA RECOUIIEITDAEIONS 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CoNgTIrUElrg Or CONCERII: pH
IMTESIIGAtrIOIT PITITIS :
This slte will be investigated according to the Surface
DLscharqe Soil Sauplinq PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERBNCE DOCIMTTTTS:
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv ProtectionReport, Septenber 1991
UNIT IIU}iBER: 384
UilItr LOCI'8IOil: If-591
mtltr DE8CRIPI'ION: Surface l{ater Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BAccooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is to a
Etorm system where it evaporates/percolates.
I,TAIIAGED fAgTEE: Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAL VOLUIIE Df8CEARGED: 387, 000 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIT DAIES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS TTTVESTTGATIONS :
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
04-24-88, in the report tltled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water oualLty Protection Report. Segtenber 7997.
RECOUilEilDaATOXS s
Initiate a sarnpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTISUETT'II8 Otr CONCERTT:
The level of aluninuu exceeds the ulnl.nuu of the
standard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant Regfulatory,
Health and Risk Based Standards), but does not exceedthe naximum leve1 for aluminun in Table 2 (Surface and
Ground Water Quality at Thiokol) . Aluminum is
regrulated only as a Secondary liaximum ContaminantLevel, and the level is only proposed at this tine.
The concentration of aluminun in this discharge doesnot exceed the level of this constituent found in
surface or ground water at Thiokol.
I}IVESTIGATIOX PLITT8 :NO FT'RTHER AETION IS PI.,ANNED.
RETEREtrCE DOCI,!TETT88 3
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
T'NIT TTUUBER: 385
.mtl[ I.OCATIOX: If-595
ITIIIT DE8CRIPIIOIT: Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BAC
coollng, and boiler condensate. lfhe discharge is to a
storm system where it evaporates/percolates.
TTATTAGED TA8TE8:fndustrial Wastewater
ANNUAL VOITUUE Df8CEARGED: 290r 000 gallons
OPERATfOIIAL DATES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOU8 Ill.grIeAIfOtrS 3
Analytical data is not available for this specif,ic'unitl however, the wastewater flow frou this source issubstantially identical to other casting building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol CorEnratLon
Ground Water ouaTity Protection Report Segtenber 7997
contains a summary of the average casting buildlng
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOI,TIiEIIDIBIONS S
Initiate a sanpling progran to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
cottsrlauE[E8 0l cottcERlt:
the leve1s of aluninum and dissolved solids exceed the
ninimun of the standard levels Ehown in Table 1
(Relevant Regrulatory, Ilealth and Risk Based Standards),but do not exceed the naxinun level for the respective
constituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluninun is regulated only as
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level, and the level for
aluninrun is only proposed at thiE time. The
concentrations of ah.rminun and dissolved solids in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of these
constituents found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol.
O rtrEsarcraror prrrxs: No FITRTHER Aqrro* rs pr.Ar{NED.
nEIEBETCE DOCT UEI'!8:
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv ProtectionReoort. Septenber 7997
o
T,I{IT III,TTBER: 386
UNI!! tOCAffOf,: U-599
ITIIIT DESCRfPIIIOIS: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BACcooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is
dispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates /percolates .
UAIIACED IA88E8r Industrial Wastewater
OPERA|IIOIAL DA![88: November 1962 to Present
PRE]VIOUS IITVEsEIGAIIIOIT8
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated
04-24-88 in the report titled ThLokoT Corpnration
Ground Water Oualfr,v Protection Report Septenber 7997.
RFA NECOTIIIEIIDAAIONS :
Initiate a sampling program to asaure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COUSIIEUEIIES OI COf,CERIT:
The levels of aluminum and disEolved solids exceed thenininun of the standard levelE shown in Table 1
(Re1evant Regulatory, Health and Risk BaEed Standards),but do not exceed the maximun leve1 for the respectiveconEtituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol) . Aluninun is regrulated only as
Secondary ![aximum Contaminant Level, and the level foraluninun is only proposed at this tine. Theconcentrations of aluminum and dissolved solids in thisdischarge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in surface or grround water atThiokol.
O r[vEsarce,,ox pr.Ars 3 No FTTRTHER AcrroN rs ,r,ANNED.
REtrEREtrCE DOCIITIEI|TS :
ThLokol Corppration Ground Water Oualitv ProtectionReoort Segtenber 1997
ITTTIT TSUDTBER: 387
I,NIS LOClSfOf,: !{-603
mtltr DE8CRfPTIOII: Surface Water Discharoe
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BACcooling, and boiler condensate. The dlscharge is
dlspersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates /perco lates .
T{.ATTAGED TA8TE8:fndustrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAII VOITUUE Df8CEARGED: 274, OOO gallons
OPERATfOIIAIT DAIES:November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESIIGA8IOX8 :
Analytical data is not available for this specificunit; however, the wastewater flos fron this source issubstantially identical to other casting building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled ThLokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection Regort Seotember 7997
containE a summary of the average casting building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
Rlt RECOUIIEIIDIATOXS:
Initiate a sanpling progrram to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COIISAfAUEIII8 OI COttCERlt!
The levels of aluminun and dLssolved solidE exceed the
minimum of the standard levelE shorn in Table 1
(Relevant Regulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards) ,but do not exceed the maximum level for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol) . Aluninuu is regrulated only as
Secondiry Maxiuum Contaminant Level, and the level for
aluminun is only proposed at this tlme. Theconcentrations of aluminum and dissoLved solids in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol.
IITVESETCIIIOII PITITTSS NO FI,RTHER AqTTON IS PI,AI.INED.
REIEREXCE DOCEUEIE8S
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report. Septenber 7997
UNIT TTUI.TBER: 388
IrNIE LOCATfOII: U-596
IINIT DESCRIPTIOI{: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BAC
cooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is to astoru systen where it evaporates/percolates.
tllltACED IlaIESs Industrial Wastewater
ef,[Irelr VOfrIrlIE DISCEARGEDT 29O, 000 gallons
OPER1IIOIIAL DATES: November L962 to Present
PRE|VIOUB IIwESIIIeIAION8 3
Analyt,ical data is not available for this speclficunit; however, the wastewater flow from this source issubstantially identical to other casting building
discharges which have analyt,ical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol CorpnratLon
Ground Water oualitv Protection Report. September 7997
contains a summary of the average casting building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
Rra RECOUTIEIIDAIrOIIS :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardouE
conEtituents are escaping proper di,sposal.
cougarauErEs 0i concsnx:
lfhe levels of aluninun and dissolved solids exceed thenininun of the standard Levels shown in 8able 1
(Relevant Regulatory, Hea1th and Rislc Based Standards),but do not exceed the rnaxinun level for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol) . Aluninum is regrulated only as
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level, and the level for
aluninun is only proposed at this time. Ehe
concentrations of a1r:ninurn and dissolved solids in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of theEe
consti.tuents found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol.
NTVESIIGITTOT PLITTS:
REFERETTCE DOCI'T{ETTTS S
NO FT'RTHER ACTION TS PI,ANNED.
I,NIT TN,TTBER: 390
UtItr L(rcl![IOt: lf-604
ITIIfE DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BAC
cooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is
dispersed onto the ground surface where it
evaporates /percolates .
TTATTAGED TA8TEE:Industrial Wastewater
eNIfUeIr VOITUIiE DISCEARGED: 27 4 r 000 gallons
OPERAIIIOI{AL DATES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS TTNTESTTGATTONE :
Analytical data is not available for this specificunlti however, the wastewater flow from this source issubstantially identical to other casting building.
dischargeE which have analytical sampllng dataavailable. The report titled ThLokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection Report. Septenber 7997
contains a summary of the average casting building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RECOUUEIIDASIOf,S:
fnitiate a sanpling prograu to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONgtrTtrUENTg Otr CONCERN:
The levels of aluminum and dissolved solidE exceed the
mininun of the standard levels shown in Table 1
(Relevant Regrulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards) ,but do not exceed the naxinun level for the respective
constituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluninun is regnrlated only as
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level, and the level for
aluminum is only proposed at this tine. The
concentrations of aluninun and dissolved solidE in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol.
ITTVESTICATTOX PLITtg 3
REFEREITCE DOCUUETTES S
NO FT'RTHER AqTTON IS PI,AI.INED.
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water OualLty ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
T,NIT TTI,UEER: 392
.UilIf LOCAIIIOf,: !f-597
mtll[ DE8CRfPIIOII: Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by cast pit wash, BACcooling, and boiler condensate. The discharge is to a
storiu system where it evaporates/percolates.
TTATTAGED TA8TE8:fndustrial Wastewater
AI{IIUAII VOLUITE DTSCEARGED: 29O, 000 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIT DATES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOU8 IIwESIIIGATIOII8 s
Analytical data is not available for this speclficunit; however, the wastewater flow from this source issubstantially identical to other casting building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thlohol Corporatlon
Ground Water oualitv Proteetion Report Segtember 7997
contains a summary of the average casting building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFt RECOUIIETDAATOXS:
Initiate a sampling prograu to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper dlsposal.
cotrg8ri[uEm8 0t cottcBRtt:
The leve1s of aluninum and dissolved solids exceed the
minimum of the standard levels shorn in Table 1
(Relevant Regnrlatory, Health and Risk Based Standards),but do not exceed the maxinun leve1 for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluminum is regnrlated only as
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level, and the leve1 for
aluninum is only proposed at this tine. The
concentrations of aluminum and dissolved solids in this
discharge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol.
ITTVESTICISIOTT PLITTE :NO FI'RTHER ACTION TS PI,ANNED.
NEtrEREtrCE DOCUIIEIE!8 :
ThLokol Corgoration Ground Water ouality ProtectionReoort Septenber 7997
fncidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate punp which would drain tothe ground surface only in an emergency.
ITAIIAGED TA8TE8:Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIJ VOLIIIIE DISCEARGED :unknown
PresentOPERETIONAIJ DATES: L962 to
TINrI NI'T{BERs 394
IrNff ITOCATIOIT: ![-505
IINIT DE8CRfPTfON: Surface Water Discharse
PRETTIOUS TTTVESTIGATIONS :
This flow has not beeninconsistent nature of
RFA RECOUUETTDATIONE:
sampled because of thethe dischargle.
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IITVESTICArION PTflNs 3
Any discharge from this unit would be in the case of an
emergency situation and there is no indication that the
discharge would contain hazardous constituents.
This'incidental flow is planned to be Lncluded fortreatment and disposal under a UPDES pernit at the tinea collection and treatment facility is constructed.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED.
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 Septenber 1991
T'NIT NT'T{BER: 399
I,NTT LOCATION: T-184
ITIIIT DESCRIPTION: Building Discharge
This building was incorrectly shown to have a surfacewater discharge. Further investigation has shown thatthis is a hot water boi.ler rather than a steam boiler.
The water is fully contained and there is no discharge.Thiokol will no longer classify this s'ite as a solld
waste management unit.
tIlltACED fAgTES: There are no wastes managed at this site.
OPERAIIIONAL DATES: Early 1960,s to Present
RFE RECOUIIEITDAIION8 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IIwE8TIGATIOII PIIAI8 !
NO FI'RTHER ACTION TS PI,AI{NED.
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
T,NTT DIT,UBER: 4OO
IINIT LOCetrfOII: T-23
IrNrtr DEgcRrPTroNs Building Discharge
This building was incorrectly shown to have a surface
water discharge. Further investigation has shown thatthis is a hot water boiler rather than a stean boiler.
The water is fully contained and there is no discharge.
Thiokol will no longer classify this site aE a solld
waste management unit.
UNTAGED IA8![88: There are no wastes managed at this site.
OPERtrIfONAL DAEE8S Early 1960rs to Present
RFA REEOUUEITDAIDIONS 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IITVEEtrIGAEION PT,Ail8 :
NO FT'RTHER ACTION TS PI,ANNED.
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
T,NIT N[,UBER: 405
uNrtr LocArrol: u-5
ITIIIT DE8CRIPTfOII: Surface Water Discharqe
fncidental surface water discharge eonsisting of
vaEtesater from a condensate pump shich would drain tothe ground surface only in an emergency.
IIAI{AGED IAgIEgt Industrial lilastewater
AltltUAL YOfTUUE Df8CEIRGED3 unknown
OPERAIIOilAL DAIIE8 . Lg62 to Present
PREVIOUS fIVEBrIGAIIONB r
This flow has not been sarnpled because of theinconsistent nature of the discharge.
RFA RECOITIiENDE,TIOf,S t
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper dl.sposal.
INVESAIOETIOX PI.Af,8 !
Any discharge from this unit would be in the caEe of an
emergency situation and there is no indLcation that the
discharge would contain hazardouE constituents.
ThlE Lncldental flow is planned to be included for
treatment and disposal under a IIPDES permit at the tinea collection and treatment facility is constructed.
NO FI'RTHER AETION IS PI,A}INED.
REFERENCE DOCITI,IENE8 s
ThLoRoI Corporat,lon Ground Water ouallty ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
PauI Hancock
EnvironmentaL Engineer
27 Septenber 1991
I,NIT TN,TIBER: 406
IrNIf IrOCAffOf,: U-6
IINrl[ DE8CRIPTfOI[3 Surface Water Discharqe
fncidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate punp which would drain tothe ground surface only in an emergency.
litAltAcED Il8fE8: Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIT VOIJITIIE DfgCEmcEDs unknown
OPERAAIOilAL DtTEg I Lg62 to Present
' PREVTOUS IIwES8IGAIIONS:
This flow has not been sampled because of theinconsistent nature of the discharge.
RTA RECOIdIIEITDAAIONS 3
Initiate a sanpling program to asaure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
I}IVESTIGAUOf, PLINS:
Any discharge fron this unit would be ln the case of an
emergency situation and there is no indication that the
discharge would contain hazardous constituents.
This'incidental flow is planned to be included fortreatment and disposal under a IIPDES permit at the tinea collectl.on and treatment facility is constructed.
NO FI'RTIIER ACTION TS PI.AITNED.
RETERELCB OOCUlinrg:
Thiokol Corpnration Ground Water Ouality ProtectLonRepnrt Septeriber 7997
Paul Hancock
Environnental Engineer
27 Septenber 1991
O uNrr NITDTBERT 4oB, 611
IINIT LOCATION: M- 9
IINIT DESCRIPTION: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface wat,er discharge generat,ed by photo rinse and
developer processes, boiler condensaEe, and once-
through cooling. The discharge is t,o an indust,rialline which flows int,o an impoundment area where it,
evaporaEes /percolaLes .
IIANAGED IIASTESc Industrial Wast,ewater
AIINUAIJ VOI.ITIIE DISCEARGED : 395, 000 gallons
OPERATIONAIJ DATES z L962 E,O PTCSENT
PR$IIIOUS NVESTIGATIOIIS :
Analytical dat,a is available for sampting event,s dat,ed
04-20-88 and 11-16-88 in t,he report, t,itled Thiokol
Coz?oration Grourtd Water Ouality Protection Report.
Septenber L997.
RFA RECOMMETIDATIONS:
Initiate a sampling prograrn to acEure no hazardous
constituent,a are eE caping proper disposal.
CONSTITITENTS OE CONCERN: Cadmium, silver and lead
INITESTTGATIOII PIrAT{S :
This site will be investigated according Eo Ehe Surface
Discharqe SoiT Sarry)7inq Plan for t,he const,ituent,s of
concern.
REFERBICE DOCTIIIBITS :
Thiokol Corporation Grourtd Water Ouality Protectioa
Reoort.. Seotenber 799 7
o
T'NIT M'UBERS 413
IrNrT LOc:ArIOf,T U-33B
IrNIT DEBCRIPIIION3 Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore AirCoiI (BAC) cooling process and a water softener. The
discharge is to an industrial ditch which flows to an
evaporation/percolation area.
ltAttAcED f,l8![E8: Industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAL VOLUIIE Df8CEIRGED! 1, 068, 000 gallons
OPERAIIIOIfAIT DAtrE83 November 1981 to Present
PREVIOUS ilVESTTGATIONS !
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
02-06-87 and 04-19-88 in the report titled Thlokol
Cornoration Ground Water Ouality Protection Report,
September 1991.
RPA RECOIIUENDAIIONs:
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coNgrIlUElIEg Or eONCERN3 pH
TITVESIIGAIIOX PLINE:
This site will be investigated accordl.ng to the Surface
Discharge Soil Samnlino Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFBRBNCE DOCI'ITEITES !
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitI ProtectLon
Report, September 1991
O urrr rurrBEB: 424
IrUfE IIOCIIfOII: lf-11
IIXIT DE8CRfPTfOI: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by the washing offlre station vehicles. The discharge is to anindustrial line which flowE lnto an impounrrrnent area
where it evaporates/percolates.
tilltAcED IA8AE8: Industrial Wastewater
AXIUII VOI.UUE DISCEARCED! 49,000 gallons
OPERIEIOUAL DAAE8: December L957 to Present
. PREVIOU8 ftrVEBAIClEIOf,S3
analytical data is available for a saupli.ng event dated
05-12-88 in the report titled Thiokol CorooratLon
Ground Water ouality ProtectLon RePort. Segtember 7997.
RIA nECOtlllElDATIOltS s
Initiate a sampling prograu to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
coxSrlauE[!!8 0t coucERl[3
The level of dissolved solids exceeds the minimun of
the'standard levels shown in Tab1e 1 (Relevant
Regu1atory, Health and Risk Based Standards) , but donot exceed the maximum level for the dissolved solidsin Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality atThiokol). The concentration of dissolved Eolids inthis discharge does not exceed the levels present inthe Surface and qrround water at Thiol<ol.
ITVE8rIOAIIOT PLIITS! NO TURTIIER ACTION IS PI,AT{NED
REIEREXCE DOCI,UE!!,ID8 S
Thiokol Corppration Ground itlater Ouality ProtectLonReport Septenber 7997
T,NI[ NT,UBER: 425
.t NIT LOCATfOil: ![-39
UNIT DESCRIPTIOIs Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a photo rl.nseprocess, boiler condensate, once-through coolJ.ng, BACcooling and a water softener. The discharge is to anevaporation/percolation area.
T{.A}IAGED TA8TE8:fndustrial Wastewater
NINUAIT VOLUUE Df8CEARGED: 684 r 000 gallons
OPERAIIIONAIT DAl[88! November 1981 to Present
PREVTOUS IITVEETIGETIONS s
Analytical data is available for sampling eventE dated
O2-O2-87, O4-L7-88 and 04-14-88 in the report tltledThiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv ProtectlonReoort, Sentember 1991
RFA RECOUI,IEITDATI ONB :
Initiate a sanpling program to assrure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUEIST8 OF CONCERN:
IIWE8IIGATIOII PLATTS:
Antimony, cadmium, chromium, silver
and lead
Thls site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharqe SoiI SanBlino PIan for the constituente of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCUUEIIII8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualLty Protectlon
Report, September 1991
T'NIT IIT'}TBER: 426
IINIT IJOCATfOf,: !{-114
T'NIT DE8CRIPTIOII: Surface Water Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by a photo rinseprocesa, boiler condensate, once-through cooling, BACcooling and a water softener. The discharge iE to theground surface where it evaporates/percolates.
I{AIIAGED fA8[88: Industrial Wastewater
AI$TUAL VOITITUE DI8CEARGED3 L,24O, 0O0 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIT DATES: November 1981 to Present
PREVIOUS TNVESIIGATION8 3
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
O2-L2-87 and 04-18-88 in the report titled Thiokol
Corporation Ground Water Oualitv Protection Report.
September 1991.
RFA RECOUUETTDATTONS3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUEITT8 Otr CONCERN:
IITVE8TIGATION PL}I{S :
Cadmium, chromium, silver and lead
thls Eite will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge Soil Sanplincr PLan for the constituents of
concern.
REFEREITCE DOCI'UEITIIS 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Report, September 1991
I'I{IE NUUBERS 432
IrNIE ITOCAIIOII U-66
IINIII DE8C8IPAIOf,T Surface Water Discharoe
Surface water discharge grenerated by Baltinore Air CoiI
(BAC) cooling, boiler condensate, and once-throughcooling. The discharge is to a stor:u dltch which flowsto an evaporation/percolation area. -
ttAttAcED I18IE8: Industrial Wastewater
ANNUIIT VOLUIIE DIECEARGED! 40,OOO gallons
OPERIIIIOIIAIr DAIES: June 1960 to Present
PREVIOUS ilVESETGATIONS S
Analytical data is not available for this specifl.cunit; however, it is slnilar in function to building M-67 (Unit No. 26Ll for which analytical data iE
aval,lable and contained in the report titled Thlokol
Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection Reoort.
September 1991.
RPe RECOUIIENDAIION8 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONgTIfUEf,Tg OP COI{CER![3 Lead and pH
rtwESEIgtAIOf, PLtttS:
ThiE site will be investigated accordLng to the Surface
Discharqe SoiI Sanpling Plan for the conEtituents of
concern.
REFERBNCE DOCUUEIT88
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Report. September 1991
Uilftr UUUBER: 435
IrXfI LOqlEIOXs U-86
UIIIII DE8CRfPTIOII: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by high pressurecutting, BAC cooling, boiler condensate, once-throughcooling, floor wash and a compressor condensate. The
discharge is to a storm ditch which flowE to an
evaporation/percolation area.
UNIaCED IA8AES: fndustrial Wastewater
ANIIUAL VOITITIIE DISCEARGED: 597,500 gallons
OPERATfOXIL DeAESs May L962 to Present
PREYIOUS IIIVESEIGASIONS I
AnalyticaL data is available f,or sampling events dated
02-05-87 and 05-10-88 in the report titled ThLokol
Corg>ration Ground Water Ouality Protection Ratrprt
September 7997.
RIA RECOIIIIEITDATIOIIg S
fnitiate a sanpling program to aasure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coxSrr8lrE[![8 0t coxeERt[3
The 'Ievels of aluminum, iron and dissolved solids
exceed the nininum of the standard levels shown in
Table 1 (Relevant Regrulatory, IIeaIth and Risk Based
Standards), but do not exceed the maxiuum level for the
reepective constituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground
Water Quality at Thiokol). Aluninurn and iron areregulated only as Secondary MaxLuum ContanLnant Levels,
and the leve1 for aluninun is only proposed at thistine. The concentrations of aluminum and iron in this
discharge do not exceed the Levels of theseconstituents found in surface sater at Thiokol, and theconcentration of dissolved solids does not exceed thelevels found in both surface and ground water.
.. III\TESTTOATIOT DLIITS S NO FI'RTHER AEIION IS PI.AIINED!
BETENEICE DOCUITEUTS S
Thl-okol Corpnration Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
T,NIT NI,ITBERI 443
UTIIT LOCATIOTg U-43
IINIT DEgCRfPTfOfs Surface WaL&rse
Incidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate punp which would drain tothe ground surface only in an emergency.
t[lltAcED tAgAES: Industrial I{astewater
eltNUeL VOIrUliE DISCEARGED! unknown
OPERAIIOilIIT DAIE8 z L962 to Present
PREVIOU8 nrVES[IOAlIOltg 3
This flos has not been sampled because of theinconsistent nature of the discharge.
RrA RECOI{UEIIDAIIONS3
Initiate a sampling progran to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
INVESAIGAAIOf, PEIIf,8 t
Any discharge fron this unit would be in the case of an
emergency situation and there ls no indication that the
discharge uould contain hazardous constituents.
Ttris lncidental flow is planned to be included fortreatnent and disposal under a IIPDES peruit at the tinea collection and treatment facility iE congtructed.
NO FI'RTIIER ACTION IS PI,AIINED.
REFERENCB DOCI'IiEITES 3
Thiokol Cortrnration Ground Water Ouality ProtectLon
Reoort. Septenber 7997
PauI Hancock
Environnental Engineer
27 Septenber 1991
UMT IYUMBERI 444,553
IINIT LOCATION: M-19A
tiNIT DESCRIPTION: Old Photographic Processing Drywell and Drainage Area
This unit consists of a drywell adjacent to building M-l9A which formerly
received waste flows from the processing of photographic fiIm. From the
drywell, the wastes flowed via a buried outlet to a drainage channel and an
evaporation/percolation area. fire building no longer functions as a photographic
processing building and the discharge currently consists of laboratory sink water,
once-through cooling and boiler condensate.
MANAGED \ilASTES: Industrial wastewater
AI\hruAL VOLITME DISCHARGED: 176,000 gallons (current operations)
OPERATIONAL DAIES: 1960 - 1977 (photographic operations)
PREVIOUS hIVESIIGATION:
Analytical data is available for a sampling errent dated 11-1G88 in the report
ttled Thiolcol Cor?oruion Gromd Waer Owlity Protection Rewrt. September
1991. This data is representative of only the current discharge and not of the
previous operations performed within this building.
RFA RECOMMET{DAIIONS:
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardous constituents are escaping
proper disposal.
CONSTITT]EIYTS OT CONCERN:
II\"VESTIGATION PLAITIS :
Cadmium, chromium, silver, lead and nickel
This site will be investigated according to the M-19A Photogrryhic Processing
Discharge Area Sanpling Plan for the constituents of concern.
IINIT NIIIIBER: 451
IINIT LOCATION: A-2
IINIT DESCRIPTION: Surface l{aEer Discharqe
Surface wat,er discharge from a hand washing sink in theprinting and copy area. The flow is intermittent.
IIAIIAGED I9A!!TES: Indust,rial Wast,ewat,er
OPERATIONAIJ DATES: December 1986 to Present
RFA RECOIIIEI{DATIONS :
Initiat,e a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IMTESTIGATION PI.AIIS :
This incident,al flow has not been sampled because ofthe inconsisEenE naEure of Ehe discharge.
This flow is planned to be included for treatment and
disposal under a UPDES Permit at, the time a collect,ion
and treatment, facility is constructed.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PIJAI{NED.
PauI Hancock
Environment,al Engineer
27 Sept,ember 19 91
T'XIE TUII8ETT 462
Irf,M.OCl8IOr3 U-225
UuIl! DEBcBfPIIolts Buildincr Debris DisPosal Area
This unit was used as a disposal area for constructiondebris. The debris consists of asphalt, wood,
concrete, metal and other construction waste.
I,LAI{AGED fAgTES:Construction debris consisting of asphalt,
wood, concrete and metal. No hazardous
wastes are known to have been deposited atthis site.
OPERATfOIIAIT DATE83
beginning operational date is unknown and the site
been inactive for several years
Rm RECOUTIEIIDAIIOilS3
CIay cap and close non-active landfills. Carefully
screen wastes to preclude any hazardoue wasteconstituents. Establish company wide recycling/reuseprograms. Ground water monitoring and renedLatl.on asindicated by analysis.
IITVESI IGAIIOX PIrAIIE :
The materials disposed within this ravine areconstruction debriE and incidental wasteE assocl,atedwith construction and building deuolition.
Thloliol,E manual titled Disposal InstntctLons tor Wasteltaterials gives procedureE for eegregatJ.ng wastenaterialE and locations for disposal for waste.
NO I'I'RTTIER A TION IS PI,AI{NED AT THIS TIUE.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
The
has
T,NTT NI,UBER: 472
IINIT LOCATIOX: U-52
IrNff DEgCRfPtrION: Surface Water Disch
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore AirCoiI (BAc) cooling process, boiler condensate, sand
mandrel wash, eyewash, once-through coollng and floor
wash water. The discharge is to an industrial drain
which flows to an evaporation/percolation area.
UAIIAGED f,AgfE8: Industrial Wastewater
AMTUEIJ VOIJI'I,TE DI8CEARGED3 <180, OOO 9AIIONS
OPERAUONAIT DA![88: 1957 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTTGETIONS 3
Analytical data is not available for this specificuniti however, it is similar in function to building M-I (Unit No. 2681 for which analytical data is avaLlable
and contained in the report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground l{ater Oualitv Protection Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOUIIEITDAIIONS :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TIIUEIIE8 Otr CONCERII3 Lead
INVE8ITGA8IOX PtrANS:
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge Soil Sanolino PIan for the constLtuents of
concern.
REI'EREIICE DOCU}TEIIES :
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Report. September 1991
UNIT TTUUBERI 479
UIIfT L@AffOXt West of !{-L87
UNII DE8CRfPTIOX: North Dispersion Area
ThiE area is the evaporation/percolation area for the
Eurface discharges frou buildingE M-8, ![-9, U-10, t{-11,U-14, U-33, U-52, U-111, l{-113, U-L79 and I{-19A.
IIAIIAOED IASTES: Industrial wastewater
OPERIIIOUAIT DAl[88: Ear]y 195O,s to Present
RFA RECOIIIIEITDATTOI{8 :
Initiate a sampling program to aEaure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
O rrrvEsrrcArrof, PreAnB:
Those buildings discharges which were found to exceedrelevant regulatory, health and risk based standards orsurface and ground water quallty leve1s are beLnginvestigated under specific workplans.
No action is planned at this site pending the outcomeof the investigations proposed for the individualbuilding discharges.
RETBREITCE DOCUUETII8 :
Thiokol Corporation Ground llater Ouall,tv ProtectionReport Seotettber 7997
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
06 JuIy L992
I'IIIT NI,UBENI 483
IrNrT LOCISIOI. M-L97
IrNIf DE8CRIPIIOXs Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by a photo rinseprocess, boiler condensate, compressor condensate,
eyewash and a water softener. The discharge is to asurface ditch which flows to an evaporation/percolation
area.
' UANAGED fA8lEgs fndustrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAL VOITIfiE DISCEARGED3 L, 607, 900 gallons
OPERA'|IfONAL, DeAEgr May 1988 to Present
PREVIOUS ilVESTTCAAIONS :
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated
11-16-88 in the report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection ReBort, Septenber 1991.
RtrA RECOUIIEIIDATTONS3
fnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TMUBNE8 OF COfCERlf: Cadmium, chromium, silver and lead
TNVEStrICAEIOil PTJENSs
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharcre Soil Sanpling PIan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'IiEIIII8 3
Thiokol Cornoration Ground Water ouality ProtectLonReport. September 1991
T'TIIT TTU}TBERI 49L
T,NI[ LOCATIOIT: T-44
I'NII DEgcRrP[roNl Buildin
ThiE building was incorrectly shown to have a Eurface
water discharge. Further investlgation has shown thatthlE iE a hot water boiler rather than a steam boiler.
The water is fully contained and there is no dlscharge.
Thiokol wiII no longer classify this site as a solid
waste management unit.
IIANAGED IABIIES: There are no wastes managed at this sl.te.
OPERAAIONAL DAAE8: Early 1950's to Present
RTA RECOUUENDArIONS 3
Inltiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
I}IVESEIGATION PI.A[8 3
NO FTIRTHER ACTION TS PI,AI.INED.
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
I'NIT NI'UBER! 493
T,NI![ LOCAEION: T-144
IrNII DESCRIPEIOXs Buildincr Discharge to a Shallow InJection WeII
Building wasteuater discharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow injectionwell.
T{.NIAGED TA8TE8:Industrial Wastewater
OPERATIONAIT DATEE:1984 - Present
PREVTOITS rtl-BStrrct![rottg !
Analytical data is not available for this specificunit; however, the wastewater flow from this source lssubstantially identical to other boiler building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection Report. September 1991
contains a summary of the average boiler building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RrA RECOUIIEIIDAIION8 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETUIS OT CONCERN:
MVEgTfGAffON PIIAIIB:
Antimony, lead and pH
This site will be investigated accordLng to thefnjection Well Soil Sarnpling Plan for the constituentsof concern.
REFEREITCE DOCI,uENI88
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Report, Septenber 1991
UilIf NITUBERS 516, 5L7
UUMTOCAAIOIT U-504
IrfIE DE8CRIPIIOIs Surface.Water DischargC
Surface water discharge consiEting of low pressure
Eteam llne and hydraulic punp cooling discharges. Thisflow discharges to a trench that is connected to a
hazardous waste sump. FIow is contained in the boilersysten and does not contact hazardous material.
IIINAGED IAglES: fndustrial l{astewater
AIIIIUAIT VO[,UliE DIECEARGED: unknown
OPERAIIOITAIJ DA8E83
L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTTGATIONST none
RAA RECOUUENDATTONS!
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IIIVESTICATIOf, PTTAITS 3
Any flow discharged by this unit is contained within a
hazardous waste sump. Material collected in the sumpis taken to building M-705 where it is treated and
dispgsed under a UPDES permit.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED.
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
T,NIT TN,UBER: 52O
UNIT ITOCAIfOI: U-5L2
ITIIIT DESCRIPIIOf,: Surface Water Discharse
Incidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate punp which would drain tothe outside only in an emergency.
UAXAGED fAgAES: fndustrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIT VOITUIIE DfSCEIRGED: unknown
OPEnaIIOIAL DeIEg 3
L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IUVESEICAAIONS :
This flow has not been sampled because of theinconsistent nature of the discharge.
RFI RECOIIIiEITDAIIIOU8 :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IIwE8EICATIOX Prreil8t
Any discharge from this unit would be in the case of an
emergency situation and there is no indication that the
dLEcliarge would contain hazardouE constltuents.
ThlE incidental flow is planned to be included for
treatment and disposal under a IIPDES pemlt at the tine
a collection and treatment facility is conEtructed.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PIJAI{NED.
REtrERENCE DOCI'UEIT!8 S
Thiokol Corporation Ground Jtlater ouall,tv ProtectLonRercrt. Seotenber 7997
Incidental surface water discharge consisting of
wastewater from a condensate punp which would drain tothe ground surface only in an emergency.
TT,ATIEGED TAgtrE8:Industrial Wastewater
ATITTUAIJ VOI.,WB DISCEARGED :unknown
to PresentOPERAIIONAIT DATES: L962
I,}IIT IIUUBEBI 526
IINIT LOCAIIOII: l[-590
IINII DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Discharse
PRE\7IOU8 ITTVESTTGATTONS :
This flow has not beeninconsistent nature of
RTA RECOT{T{ETTDATTO}IS 3
sampled because of thethe discharE e.
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
rlrVESlrICArIOX Pf.ltgs
Any discharge from this unit would be in the case of an
emergency situation and there is no indication that the
discharge would contain hazardous constituents.
This incidental flow is planned to be included fortreatuent and disposal under a IIPDES permit at the tinea collection and treatment facility is constructed.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED.
RETEREITCE DOCI'IIEU88 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground hlater ouality ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 Septenber 1991
T,NItr NT,UBER: 527
IINII IJOCATIOII: !f-605
IrNIT DEgcRIPIIolts BAC Coolinq Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge lrenerated by a Baltinore AirCoil (BAC) cooling process. The discharge is dispersed
onto the ground surface where it evaporates/percolates.
UANAGED fA8![E8: Industrial Wastewater
ANNUAIT VOITUIIE Df8CEAROBDS 2'l 4,OO0 gallons
OPERATIOI{IIl DAIE8S November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESIIGITTONS :
Analytical data is not available for this specificunitl however, the wastewater flow from this source lEsubstantially identical to other BAC cooling discharges
which have analytical sampling data available. The
report titled Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv
Protection Report, September 1991 contains a summary of
the BAC wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOUlitEltDAIf olt8 B
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTI:IUEIT8 OF CONCERII: Cyanide
IITVESrIGAIIOT PLETS 3
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge SoiI Sannling Plan for the constl,tuents of
concern.
RBFERBNCE DOCIruBNTS:
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, Septenber 1991
T'NIT
T'NIT
T'NIT
NT'T{BER: 528
IrOCAIION: ![- 628
DE8CRIPUON: Surface l{ater Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by boiler condensate.
The discharge is dispersed onto the ground surface
where it evaporates/percolates.
I{,ANAGED fAg[Bg: fndustrial Wastewater
AIINUAI.. VOITITUE DISCEARGEDS <200, 000 gallons
OPERAtrIOIIAII DATES: November 1962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTTGAIIION8 s
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
01-25-91 in the report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water oualitv Protection Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOUIIETDETIONS 3
Initiate a saurpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TIIUEIIII8 OF CONCERIIs Mercury
IIwESTIGATfON PLANS s
This site wiII be investigated according to the Surface
Discharcre Soil Samplinq PIan for the constLtuents of
concgrn.
REFERENCE DOCI'UEII![83
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
I,NIT TTT,TTBER: 529
LOCIIIOII tf-538
DESCRIPTfON: Surface Wat&qe
Incidental surface water discharge consisting of
saEtewater from a condensate punp which would drain tothe outside only in an emergency.
TT.ATIAGED TA8TE8:Industrial Wasteuater
ANNUAIT VOITITIIE Df8CEARGED :unknown
IITTIT
UNIT
OPERATIOTTIL DATES:
L962 to Present
PREVIOU8 NWESTIGITTONE :
This flow has not been
inconsistent nature of
sampled because of thethe discharge.
RtA RECOllltEltDArIOItg 3
Initiate a sanpling progran to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal..
rmTEg[rctrlou Pr,lNg 3
Any discharge from this unit would be in the caEe of an
emergency situation and there is no indlcation that the
discharge would contain hazardous constituents.
TtrLE incidental flow is planned to be lncluded fortreatuent and disposal under a IIPDES permit at ttre tinea collection and treatnent facility is conEtructed.
uo ruirHER AcrroN rs Pr,AI{NED.
RETERENCE DOCUIiEUTS3
Thtokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport. Seotenber 7997
I'NIE NIIIIBER: 532
uxIE Ir(rctaIIOXs U-705
UNI![ DEgCRIPIIOtts Former Surface Water Discharqe
Former surface water discharge consisting of bol.ler
blowdown, BAc cooling and a water softener. In 1990the discharge to the surface was elininated by routingit through the wastewater treatuent processes withinthe building.
tilltAGED fAg![EE: fndustrial Wastewater
OPERIT IOilAIT DATE8S 1989 to 1990
PREVIOUS IITVESIIIGITIONS :
No specific analytical data is available for this unLt.
However, the report titled Thiokol CorporatLon Ground
Water Ouality Protection Report Septeraber 7997contains a summary of the average boiler building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFI RECOUUEIIDAIIIONS 3
fnitiate a sanpll.ng prograu to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
INVESTTGAIION PI,NTS3
This flow is sinilar to other boiler, BAC flows that
have.been sampled at the ThiokoL facility. The reporttitled lflhl,okol, Corpnration Ground Water Ouall,tvProtection Report September 7997 contains a suDmary ofthe average boiJ.er building wastewater effluent
concentrations.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED.
Paul Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
UIIIT f,I'UEEBS 533
IrtrIE LOCIIIIOIT T-91
Irf,II DESCRIPUOX: Building Discharge
This building was incorrectly shown to have a surface
water discharge. Further investigation has shown thatthis is a hot water boiler rather than a steam boiler.
The water is fully contained and there is no discharge.
Thiokol will no longer classify this site as a solid
waste management unit.
UAII1GED IAS![E8I There are no wastes managed at this Eite.
OPEnAIfONaL DATESS Early 1960's to Present
' Rrl REcolIliEltDArIOlt8 s
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IIVE8IIGAIIOX PIIANS3
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED.
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
IINIT ITUDIBEB: 557 , 624
TINIT I,OCIIIOII T-51A
IINIT DE8CRfP[fON: Surface Water Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by a hand washing sinkand a building floor drain. This building is aboilerhouse, and there are no other operations occurringwithin the building.
TIANACED TA8TE8:fndustrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAIT YOI,UIIE Df8CEARGED: Not available
OPERATfOII1IT DAIEE:Early 1960 r Present
PREVIOUS IITVESAIGATIOTTS :
fn Septenber 1990, a drlmell, which received the
waetewater discharge from this building, rras removed forbullding modifications and expansion. Trro soil samples
were taken following removal of dr1nreIl, a composite ofthe soil below the dry weII and a background. ThereEults of the analysis ehowed no volatlle organicsdetected in either sample.
RFA RECOITIIEIIDAAIONS s
fnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONgTfTUEIttrS Otr CONCERII: None
ITUVESTIGATTOil PIIATTS :
The analytical data obtainedactivities has shown that aII
below detection linits.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED TOR
during soil samplingvolatile organics were
THE RFI.
RETEREtrCE DOCUTIETTT8 3
T-57 SoiT Sample Analysis;
UNTT NT,UBER: 559
UNIT ITOCATIOXS T-?LD
t NIT DE8CRfPTIOI[3 Floor Drain Discharge
Surface water discharge from a floor draLn withinbuilding T-21D, which houses a boiler. The diecharge isto the ground surface approximately 2OO feet weEt of thebuilding.
III.A}IAGED TASTESS Industrial Wastewater
ADINUAIJ VOI,III.IE DI8CEARGED: Not available
OPERATIONAf,, DATEE:1959 - Present
PREVIOU8 IIwBSIIICIIION8 s
In September 1990, Thiokol Environmental Engineering
Personnel located a discharge pipe which appeared to be
connected to building T-21D. At the discharge end of thepipe, a small area (approximately 2 ft X 2 ft) of thesoils hras stained with a oily like substance. Withinbuilding T-21D, fuel oil was found to be drlpping fromthe connection between the fuel distrlbution line and theboiler. Directly below the connectLon was a floor drain
presuned to be the source of the oily discharge. Thesoils in the discharge area were sampled and analyzed forvolatile organics. Trace contaminates uere detected inthe sample, but the same contaminates were also detectedin the background sample.
RFA RECOUilEITDAEIOf,S 3
fnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUENT8 Otr CONCER}T :
flWEgTfGATfON PLADIE:
Vo1atile orgranj.cs
The analytical data obtained during the initial soil
sampling activities is inconclusive. only one Eamp1e ofthe contaminated soil rras obtained as well as one
o background sample. The analytical data indicateE thatthe contaminates were found in both samples atesEentially the same levels. The presence of IrIEK in thebackground is highly suspect and warrants further
sampling.
This site will be investigated according to the T-21DDischarqe Investicration Plan.
REFERENCE DOCIIUETTTS :
T-?LD Soil Samp1e Analysis;
T,NIT DIT,UBER: 560
IINIT ITOCATIOIT: A-2
IrNIT DE8CRIPUOI{: Surface Water Discharse
Surface water discharge consisting of photo rinse anddeveloper. The discharge is to a drainage ditch whichflows into an impoundment where it
evaporates /percolates .
IiAI{AGED IAgTEgr Industrial Wastewater
AIMUAL VOLITUE DISCEARGEDS 2O5,000 gallons
OPERATIONAL DATES: 1986 - Present
PREVIOUS ITTVESAIGATIONS t
Analyt,ical data is available for sampllng events dated
O2-O9-87, 04-19-88, and 11-15-88 in the report tltledThiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv ProtectLon
Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOTOIETTDATIONE :
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouE
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSITIUETUTg OT CONCERN:
IITVESIIGATION PL}TI8:
Cadmium, silver, chromium, lead,volatile organics and ph
This Eite will be investigated accordlng to the Surface
Discharcre Soil Samplinq Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'IiEIIES 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv ProtectLon
Report. September 1991
o IINIT NT'MBER:506 , 610, 5L9
IrNIT LOCATIONz M-627
IINIT DESCRIPTION: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface wat,er discharge generaE,ed by boiler condensat,e
The discharge is into a drainage diEch where it,
evaporates /percolates .
I{AI{AGED TTASTES:Industrial Wastewater
AI{NUAL VOTIIME DISCIIARGED: <200, 000 gallons
OPERATIONAIT DATES: November L962 to Present,
PRT\IIOUS IMTESTTGATIONS :
Analytical data is available for a sampling event, dat,ed
0L-25-9L in t,he report titled ThiokoT Corporation
Ground Water OuaTity Protection Report. Septeniber 7997.
RFA RECOUUEIIDATIONS:
IniE,iat,e a sampling program to assure no hazardous.
consEituenEs are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITT'ENTS OF CONCERN:
The levels of aluminum and dissolved solids exceed t,he
minimum of t,he st,andard levels shown in Table 1
(Relevant, RegulaEory, Health and Risk Based Standards),
buE do not, exceed t,he maximum level for t,he respecEive
const,iEuents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
QuaIiEy at, Thiokol). Aluminum is regulated only as
Secondary Maxj.mum Cont,aminant lrevel, and t,he level for
aluminum is only proposed at, t,his time. The
concentrations of aluminum and dissolved solids in this
discharge do not exceed t,he levels of these
const,ituent,s found in surface or ground water at
Thiokol.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS PITAMED.INVESTIGATION PI.AT{IS :
O REFEREN.E DocrrlrE*rs:
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water OuaTity Protection
Reoort, Septeriber 7997
TINIT NI,T{BER: 511
9NIT L,OCAIION: U-9
IINIT DE8CRIPTfON: Surface l{ater Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by photo rinse and
developer processes, boiler condensate, and once-through cooling. The discharge is to an induEtrialline which flows into an impoundment area where it
evaporates / perco lates .
UANAGED feglIESr Industrial Wastewater
eNlIuAIr VOIJIniB DISCEIRGED3 396,000 gallons
OPERATIOIIAIJ DATE8. L962 tO PTESENt
PREVIOUS NTVBSEICEIIONg :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated04-20-88 and 11-16-88 in the report titled Thloko1Corporation Ground l[ater oualitv Protection Report,.
@.
RTE RECOIdIiIEI{DATIONE :
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TITUEIIT8 OF CONCERIIs Cadmium, chromiun, sJ.lver and lead
MVESIIGAIIOf, P&el{8s
Thls Eite will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharcre Soil Sanpling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
RETERENCE DOCUIIEITT8S
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionRerort, Septenber 1991
O turr ntlIBER: 613
mtf'f I.OGIIIOI: !f-52W
IrXIE DESCRIP!!I0tr: Former Surface Water Discharoe
A fomer surface water discharge generated by a
degreaser sump. The discharge was to a storm ditch and
then to an evaporation/percolation area. This
discharge was discontinued in 1990.
lilltAGED IA8!!E8s Industrial Wastewater
AXXUIL VO[.U![E DIgCEmcEDT 25r000 gallons (estinated)
OPERI|IIOIIIL DITES: November 1957 to 1990
PREYIOUS IIIVEgEIGAEIOIIS :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
O2-O9-87, 04-28-88, 05-11-88, 11-16-88 and 01-24-91 inthe report titled Thiokol Corpnration Ground Waterouality Protection Reoort. September 7991.
Rre RECO!0IEIIDArIOUS !
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COUSII8UEIIE8 OT COUCERN:
The levels of aluminum, boron, iron and dissolvedsolids exceed the ninimum of the standard levels shownin Table 1 (Relevant Regulatory, Health and Risk Based
Standards), but do not exceed the maximun Level for therespective constituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground
Water Quality at Thiokol).
ITVESAIGATIOIT PLIITS: NO FT,RBTIER ACTTON TS PI,AI.INED
RETERETCB DOCTIUETE8 S
ThLokol CorEnration Ground hlater Ouality ProtectionReport Seotenber 7997
I,TTIT TTUI.TBER: 6L4
mtl! LOCilTfOf,l l{-55
IINIT DE8CRIPTIOX: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge grenerated by boiler condensate.
The diEcharge is to an evaporation/percolatLon area.
UAilACED IAa![E8: Industrial llastewater
EXf,UAL VOLUUE DI8CEARGEDS 87,500 gallons
OPERAIfOUAL DAIE8. L957 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTTCAIIONS S
Analytical data is available for a saupling event dated
01-25-91 in the report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection Reptort. September 7997.
RfA BECOtltlEtDA|[IOf,S s
Initiate a sampling prograu to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
couSErruEmg ot coucERtr!
The levels of aluminum and dissolved solids exceed thenininun of the standard levels shown in Table 1(Relevant Regulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards),but do not exceed the maximum level for the respectiveconetituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quallty at Thiokol). Aluminun is regnrlated only as a
Secondary Maximum Contaninant Level, and the level for
aluminum is only proposed at this tiue. Theconcentration of aluminun in this discharge doeE not
exceed the level found in the surface waters, and theIevel of dissolved Eolids does not exceed either thesurface or giround water levelE.
IITVESTTCIETOT PI.If,8S NO FT'RTHER ASTTON IS PI,AIiINED
O RETERErcE DocuuErrlss
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water oualLty ProteetLonRegort Septenber 7997
T,NTT NT,UBBR: 615
IINIT L,OCATION: ![-57
IINIT DE8CRIPI'ION: Surface Water Discharqe
Surface water discharge generated by boiler condensate.
The discharge is to a ditch which flow to anevaporation/percolation area .
Id,AIIAGED fABIEgl Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIT VOIrIrl[E DISCEARGEDs 80, 000 gallons
OPERATIONAIT DATES: L957 to Present
PREVIOUS IIIVE8:ITGATION8 S
analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated
01-25-91 in the report titled Thiokol CorporatLon
Ground Water Ouality Protection Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOUilEITDAIIONS s
fnitiate a sampling progran to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONglIfUENl[g OF CONCEBII3 l{ercury
IIwE8IIIGA:IION Plrlltg 3
This Site will be investigated accordl.ng to the Surface
Discharge Soil Samplino Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCUIiEIIES!
Thiokoi Corporation Ground l{ater oualitv ProtectionRegort, September 1991
O lrrrr nIruBER: 6L7
'[TNM ITOCA'IIOil: E-522
UUIE DEScRIPtlIoIs FLre Truck Wash Surface Water DiEcharqe
Surface water discharge to the grround surface generated
by the washing of fire station vehicles.
llAltAGED IAgAEg: Industrial Wastewater
AltlTUEL VOLUIIE DISCEARCED: 35r000 gallons
ODERAIIOIIAL DAIE8S November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IXVESIICA|IIOTS 3
Analytical data is not available for this specificunit: however, data is available for buildlng I.l-11
which is substantially identical in function. ThiEdata is found in the report titl,ed Thiokol Corrcration
Ground Water ouality Protection Reptort Septenber 7997
RAI RECOIIIIEIDIIIOf,S 3
fnitiate a sanpling progran to aEsure no hazardouEaonstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coxSarIuEil!8 03 cotcERI[:
There are no constituentE which exceed the uininun ofthe standard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regrulatory, Hea1th and Risk Based Standards), or exceedthe surface water and ground uater quality levels shownin Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
ThJ.okol).
IIIVESIIICA|IIOX PT.il[gt NO FI,RTHER AETION IS PIJAIINED.
REFEREITCE DOCUIIEIII8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water OualLty ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
T,NI8 NT,UBER: 618
IINIT IrOCAIIOII: M-514
ITIIIT DE8CRIPTION! BAC Cooling Surface Water Discharge
surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore Air coil
(BAC) cooling process. The discharge is to a drainage
channel where the water evaporates/percolates.
I{,A![AGED fAgl[EE: Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAL VOtt I,IE DISCEARGED: 237,000 gallons
OPERATIONAI.I DATES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS T}{VE8IICAEION8 3
Analytical data is not available for thiE speci.fic unlt;however, the wastewater flow fron this source lssubstantially identical to other BAC cooling dischargeswhich have analytical sampling data available. Thereport titled Thiokol Corporatlon Ground Water oualityProtection Report, September 1991 contains a summary ofthe BAC wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOIIIIENDATIONS :
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coNgTfTUEI[Tg OF CONCERN: Cyanide
IIwEBIIGAIIOU PIrNtgs
This site will be investigated aceordLng to the Surface
Discharge SoiI Sampling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'UBITESS
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protectlon
Reoort. Septenber 1991
UilI[ NI'TIBER: 619
ITNM.OCAIIIOXS l{-627
UNME8CRfPTIOII: Surface Water Discharge
Surface vater discharge generated by boller condensate
The dlscharge is into a drainage ditch where it
evaporates /percolates .
I{AIIAGED fAgTEE: fndustrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAL VOITUUE Df8CEARGED: <200, 000 gallons
OPERAIfONAL DATES: November L962 to Present
PREVIOUS IITVESEIGAIIOIT8 3
Analytlcal data is avallable for a sampling event dated
01-25-91 in the report titled Thl,okol Corporation
Greund Water ouality Protection Report- September !997.
RFe RECOlniE[DArrOnSs
rnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONgtrIAUEmg Ol COltCERlt3
The levels of aluminum and dissolved solids exceed the
ninimun of the standard levels shown in Table 1
(Relevant Regulatory, Hea1th and RiEk Based Standards),but do not exceed the maximun leveI for the respectiveconstituents in Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water
Quality at Thiokol). Aluninum is regnrlated only as
Secondary Maximrun Contaminant Level, and the level for
alumintm is only proposed at this tiue. The
conce-ntrations of aluninun and dissolved solide in thiE
discharge do not exceed the levels of theseconstituents found in Eurface or ground water at
Thiokol.
INVE8TfGATfON PIIAIIS :NO FTIRTHER ACTION IS PI,A}INED.
RETERETTCE DOCI'IIETTT8 S
ThLokol Corooration Ground Water oualLty ProtectLon
Report. Septenber 7997
TINIT NT,UBER: 620
IrNIf LOCA8IOf,S U-7O2
IINII DESCRIPIION3 Surface l{ater Discharse
Surface water discharge generated by a Baltinore AirCoil (BAc) cooling process, boller condensate and washwater. The discharge is onto the ground surface whereit evaporates/percolates.
tlAlIAcED fAgIES: Industrial Wastewater
ANNITAIT VOL,ITUE DISCEARGED3 L,260, 000 gallons
OPERAAIONAI'I DA![ES: Spring L992 to Present
PREVIOU8 I}IVESrIGETION8 3
Analytical data is not available for this speclficunit; however, it is identical in function to building
l,t-570 (Unit No. 285) for which analytical data iEavailable and contained in the report titled Thiokol
Corooration Ground Water oualitv Protection Report,
September 1991.
RTA RECOUIIENDATIONS:
Initiate a samplinlt program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COI{gfIlUBmg Of CONCERII: Cyanide and pH
fITVE8EIGAEIOU Plef,8s
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharqe SoiI Sampling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFBRENCE DOCI'IiENE83
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Report. Septenber 1991
T,NIT NT,T{BERI 62L
UNIT f.,OCltrfOf,l !f-55W
T'NIT DE8CRTPIIOI{:
Surfaceboileristoa
T{ATTAGED TA8TE8:
Surface l{ater Discharqe
water discharge generated by vehicle washing,
condensate, and steam cleaning. The discharge
storm ditch where it evaporates/percolateE.
Industrial Wastewater
A![.UAIJ VOITIII.IB DI8CEARGED: 355, OO0 gallons
OPERATIONAIJ DATES: L957 tO PTCSENt
PREVIOUE TTWESTTGATIONE :
Analytieal data is available for a saupling event dated
08-06-91 in the report tltled Thiokol CorporatLon
Ground Water Oualitv Protection Report, Septenber 1991.
Rtr.A RECOTTITTETTDATIONS :
Initiate a sanpling program to aEsure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper dl.sposal.
CONSTITUETIIS Otr CONCERN:Vo1atile organicsr cadmium, sulfate,
zLnc, manganese, Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and pH
IlI.StrIcA![IOf, PLtAtr8 s
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharoe SoiI Samplincr Plan for the constituentE of
concern.
REFEREITCE DOCI'IIEITES !
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualltv ProtectLon
Report, September 1991
T'NI8 NT'T,IBER: 622
UNIT LOCATIOT: l{-364
IINfT DE8CRfPUON: Surface Water Discharge
Surface water discharge generated by boiler condensate,boiler blowdown, BAC cooling, and a water softener.
The discharge is to a surface ditch which flows to anevaporation/percolation area.
II.A}IAGED TA8TEE:fndustrial Wastewater
N[![UAL VOLTUE DISCEARGED: 756,O00 gallons
OPERATIONAI, DA[88:1988 to Present
PREVIOUS TIIVE8ITIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is not available for this speclfl.cunit; however, the wastewater flow from thls source issubstantially identical to other boiler building
discharges which have analytical sanpling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water oualitv Protection Report. September 1991contains a summary of the average boiler building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOIIIiIENDAEIONS 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coNsSrTuEItSS 0F CONCERI{:
IITVESTIGAITON PLATTS :
Antimony, lead and pH
this site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharqe Soil Sanpling PIan for the constituentE of
concern.
REFERENCE DOCIIIdETTTS:
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectLon
Reoort, September 1991
UNII' TTUTTBER: 623
T'NIT LOCATTOf,: U-558
IINIT DE8CRIPTIOT: Surface Water Discharcre
Surface water discharge generated by battery chargingoperations. The discharge is to the ground surface
where it evaporates.
lllltlGED IlAfEBr fndustrial Wastewater
Af,IUAL YOLUI|E DISCEIRGED: 120r000 gallons (estinated)
OPEnA8IOltlL DAIES. 1957 to Present
PREVfOUg nwEg[IGAIIOttg 3
Analyt,ical data is not available for this specificunitr' however, it is sinilar in function to building E-
516 (Unit No. 235) for which analytical data iEavailable and contained in the report titled Thiokol
CorporatLon Ground Water Ouality Protection ReportW.
RFA RECOllltEltDAl[IOlt8 r
Initiate a sampling progran to asEure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COXgfIII,EllEg Ol CottcEnlts
Ther'e are no constituents which exceed the ninimum ofthe Etandard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regulatory, Health and Risk BaEed Standarde), or exceedthe surface water and ground water quality leveIs shownin Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
Thiokol) .
rIwESIIIGITIOX Pllf,s:
The battery charging operation has been moved from thisbuilding to M-137A. Procedures call for neutralizing
any spilled acid, and spilled materials are fully
contained.
REtrERETCE
NO FT'RTIIER ACTION IS PI,AI.INED
DOCIniEUEg I
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water oualLty P oteetLon
Report. Septenber 7997
T'NIT TN'TTBERI 634
IINIT LOCITIOI: South of tr{-148
IrNIf DE8CRIPTIOf,: South Dispersion Area
AhiE area is the evaporatLon/percolation area for thesurface discharges fron buildings !l-53, Iri-56, lq-57, [t{-66, U-67, U-72, Irl-86, U-87, U-L97, U-364 and I-10.
I{AIIAGED fAgTES: Industrial wastewater
OPERATfOIIAIT DATES: Early 1950's to Present
RFA RECOuuEltDAIrOf,S 3
fnitiate a sampling prograu to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
IITVEStrICAAIOT PLNIS!
Those buildings discharges whlch were found to excebdrelevant regulatory, health and risk based standards or
surface and ground water quality levelE are belnginvestigated under specific vorkplans.
No action is planned at thiE Eite pending the outcomeof the investigations proposed for the individualbuilding discharges.
RETEREf,CE DOCI'UEIM8 S
Thlokol Corporation Ground Water oualltv Proteetion
Report- Septenber 7997
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
06 July L992
T'NIT NT'UBER: 642
t NII ITOCATION: !f-4O
IINII DE8CRIPTION: Surface Water Dissharqe
Surface water discharge generated from building
washout. The discharge is to the asphalt at the north
end of the building.
UAt{ecED fAgfEg: Industrial Wastewater
' ANNUAIT VOLIII|E DISCEIRCED! Not available
OPERIIIONAL DAfESs Beginning date unknown to Present
- PREVIOUS IITVESEIGAIIIONs3
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
6-25-92 which was after the submittal of the reporttitled Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv
Protection Report, September 1991.
RFE RECOUITEITDATIONS 3
fnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper dlsposal.
cONgTIlrUEtl,|rg Or CONCERIT: Nickel and pH
II{\TESEIGITION PTJANS 3
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharoe Soil Sampling Plan for the constltuents of
concern.
RETERENCE DOCI'IIEITII8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv Protection
Report, September 1991
HztrrqHtsI(/!oclt{tEt<>o
ezE'IUIEIFF
TINTT NIIUBER: 20
IrNftr I.OCATfOX: !f-508-1
UuMEgeR,IPaIox: Buildinq Discharcrto a Dralnfield
Buildlng wastewater discharge generated by x-ray photo
processing, once-through cooling and a water softener.
Ahis drainfield was abandoned in 1985 and replaced by U-
509-2.
lIeilAcED IA8IE8: Industrial Wastewater
1IIIIUAIT VOLUIIE Df 8CEARGED :1, 300, 000 gallons
OPERAUOIIAIT DATES: 1950s - 1985
PREVIOU8 IIwEg![rGATIOltg!
llhis site is currently under investigation as part of a
SoiTs Study Plan.
RtrA RECOI{}IEIIDAIf ONB :
SoiI and ground water sanpling with renediation asindicated by analysis.
COIIStrITUETTtrS OF CONCERT{:Cadmium, chromium and silver
IIM8IIICIAIOX PIIAII8 s
In April Lg8?, Morton Thiokol entered into a Stipulation
and Consent Order with the Utah Solid and llazardous Waste
Conmittee (Case NoE. 85O2L62, 8606402) in regards toseveral discharge areas. Morton Thiokol agreed toinvestigate these areas in a SoiTs Studv Plan and tobegin closure activities based on the f,indings and
conclusions of the Conmittee. Environmental activitiesat thiE Eite will proceed as specified in the Stl.pulation
and Consent Order.
NO ADDITIONAL AETION IS PI,AITNED AS PART OF TTIE RFI.
RETEREf,CE DOCUT,TETTTS :
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality Protection
Report. Septenber 7997
I'NI! NT'UBER: 23
utrtr Loca![Io!t3 trf-114
UIIA DE8CBIPIIOII: Buildinq Discharge to a Drrmell and Drainfield
Bulldlng wastewater discharge generated by x-ray photo
processing, once-through coolJ.ng, BAC cooling, boiler
condensate, eyewash and a water softener. The
discharge was to a dr1melI and drainfield. The drywell
was abandoned in 1987, and the fixer and developersolutions are now collected for silver recoverY.
T,IATTAGED [ASTE8:fndustrial Wastewater
Atf,UlL VOf.UUl DfSCEIRGEDI L,24O,000 gallons
OPERATfOIIAL DATES: 1960s - Present
PREVIOUS ITTVESSIGAIIONS :
This site is currently under investigation as part of a
SoiTs Study Plan.
RECOtotE[DArrONs:
Soil and grround water sanpling with remediation as
indicated by analysis.
CONS!ItrUETT?88 Otr CONCERTT:
IIMSSIGATfOil PIIAIIE:
Cadmium, chromium, lead and silver
In April L987, Morton Thiokol entered into aStipulation and Consent Order with the Utah SoLid and
Hazardous lfaste Conmittee (Case Nos. 8502162, 8605402)in regards to several discharge areas. Morton Thiokol
agrreed to investigate these areas in a SoLls Study Plan
and to begin closure activities based on the findings
and conclusions of the Committee. EnvironmentalactlvitleE at this site wiII proceed as specified inthe Stipulation and Consent Order.
NO FTIRTHER ACTION IS PI,A}TNED
REtrEREISCE DOCUUETTII83
ThLokoT Corgtration Ground Water ouality Protection
Report. Seotenber 7997; GeohydroTogLc Investigatl,on
Photographlc Waste Sitesi StLPruTation and Consent Order
Case Nos. 8502762. 8606402
utr!
utlr
MtIT
TSUTIEERg 191
IIOCA'IIOX: A-2
DEgcnrPuoxt old Photoqraphic ProcesEinq Drainfield
Septic drainfield which received large amounts of
sanJ.tary uaste and a small amount of photographic fixersoLution. This drainfield was abandoned in L975 whenDrainfield A was installed vest of the adninistrationarea. Douestic wastewater now floys to Drainfields A,
B and C, and the fixer solution is collected for silver
recovery.
o
ITATTAGED TA8trE8:
Wastes containingsmall quantities
AITTTUAL VOLUUE DISCEARGED :
OPERASIOTTAI. DATEE: L972 - L975
RFA RECOWfONS: Sampling
CONSTTSUETTTS Otr CONCERT{:
ITTVESTTGAIIOII PITATTE :
silver, cadmium, and possibly veryof chromium and lead.
2L5 r 000 gallons
Cadmiun, silver, chromitrn and lead
Thls site will be investigated according to the &]Photograohic ProcessLng Drainfield Saapling Plan forthe constituents of concern.
REIEBEICE DOCUITEITES I
Thiokol CorpnratLon Ground Water OualLty ProtectionRegort Septenber 7997
I'UIE f,I'UBEN! 227
umr &ocArlors u-585
Utff! DE8CBfPAIOI: Buildino Discharae to a French Drain
Building wastewater discharge generated by a chemicallaboratory. Discharging of hazardous waste to this unitwas discontinued in 1980.Wastewater currently
discharging to this unit currently consists of sink waterfrou the rinsing of glassware. The discharge is to a
French Drain.
TTATTAGED TASTIES:Industrial Wastewater
eililUelr VOITUIIE Df8CEARGED: 181r300 gallons
OPERITIOITAL DAI[88:1950s.- Present
PREVIOUS IITVEEIIGAEIONS 3
Thie site has been investigated under the U.S. Air ForceInstallation and Restoration Program (IRP). Worlc on thesite has included soil sanpling, ground water sampling,
and geophysical surveys. Results of these investLgatj.ons
are detailed in the report title InstaTTation Restoration
Program U.S. Air Force Plant 78.
RFA RECO}IITEIIDAAIOUS :
Soil and grround water sanpling in the iunediate area and
downgradient with renediation as indicated by analysis.
CONSTTTUETTT8 Otr CONCERT{:
IIM8TIGAIIOil PLAITE:
Refer to the IRP Reports
Any further investigation at this site will be
under the IRP.
NO ADDTTIONAI, AETION IS PI,AI{NED AS PART OF TIIE
conducted
RFI.
REFERETTCE DOCI'TIETT'I8 3
lEhlokol Corporation Ground Water oualLty Protection
ReP rt. Septenber 7997 1 InstaTTatt on RestoratLon Program
U.S. ALr Eorce Elant--2L
T,NI8 NT,UBERg 228
IrNIT ITOCAIfOI{: !{-53IIIH
UNIT DE8CRIPTION: Concrete Drywell
This unit consists of adrpell located south of
receives wastewater from
equipment in laboratory
6 foot diameter concretebuilding !{-53. The drryell
washing glassware andsinks.
IIAIIAGED TAgTEgs
Until approximately 1980, this unit is believed to havereceived wastes containing metals, acids, bases, andpossibly some solvents. Since 1980 training andnodifications to procedures are believed to haveessentially elininated many of the hazardousconstituents from entering the dr1mell.
AIINUAIJ VOLIIIIE Df8CEARGED: 513 r 000 gallons
OPERATfONAIT DATE8:1959 - present
PREVIOUg NTVESIIGATIONS :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated02-06-87, 04-18-88, 05-10-88 and 01-24-91 in the reporttitled Thiokol Cornoration Ground Water oualityProtection Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOIIITEITDATTONS 3
Initiate a sampling progran to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUENE8 OF CONCERNg Cadmium, chromium, lead, mercuryrsilver, zinc, copp€rr volatile
organics and pH
IIIVE8TIGATION PIrAIIS :
This site will be investigated accordLng to theIniection Well Soil Sampling PIan for the constituentsof concern.
RET'ERENCE DOCI'UBTTTS :
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protectl.on
Report, September 1991
T,NIT NT,}TBER: 234
IINII ITOCATION: I-10S
mllr DE8CRIP8IONI South Sink Drywell
This unit consists of a dr1melI located approxinately
30 ft south of building I-10. The dr1nrell receives
wastewater from washing glassware and equipment in thelaboratory sinks.
I{.AIIAGED TA8![88:Industrial Wastewater
NINUAIT VOITIII{E DISCEARGED: 350r000 gallons
OPERAIIONAIJ DATE8S Nov L962 D present
PREVIOUS INVESrIGI TONS3
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
O2-O9-87 and 05-19-88 in the report titled rhiokol
Corporation Ground Water Ouality Protection Report.
September 1991.
RTA RECOI{}IENDITIONS :
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUETTTS OF CONCERN:
MVESTIGATfON PITAII8:
Cadmium and lead
This site will be Lnvestigated accordlng to theInJection Well Soil Sanpling Plan for the constituentsof concern.
REFEREITCE DOCt'IIEilTg 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
O T,NIT NUITBER: 25o
Irf,It OCtAIOf,3 [rt-85
uxla DEgcRIPIIotts Buildino Discharqe to a Septic Tank/Drainfield
Buildlng discharge consisting of sink and sewagewastewater. The discharge is to a septic
tank/drainf ield system.
UIIIAOED IIS![ES: Industrial Wastewater
AtltITEL VO&IIUE DIECEARGED: 36,500 gallons
OPERIIIIOUIL DIIES! Nov L962 - present
PREVIOU8 IIwEg[IGlrfOtg 3
Analytical data is available for sampling eventE dated
02-05-87 and OL-24-9L in the report titled ThLokol
Corporation Ground Water Ouality Proteetion Reoort.
Septenber 7997. The analytical data for the sanpling
event dated O2-O5-87 does not represent the wastewaterflos fron current operations. The bullding has
undergone extensive remodeling and changes in
process es. The data for the sanpling event dated 01-
24-9L is not for this building but for buildlng lq-77.,
and was uislabeled in the report.
Rtt RECOT[f,EttDATIOf,8 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
cof,garruBmS 0, coucERns
The levelE of ammonia and iron exceed the niniuum ofthe standard levels shown Ln Table 1 (Relevant
Regrulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards), and alsothe maximun levels for these constituents in Table 2(Surface and Ground Water Quality at Thiokol).
O rrnrEsrrc.rror PLrnss
Although a'n'nonia and lead levels discharged to the
inJection well exceed those Ehown in Tables 1 and 2,
these constituents are not une:rpected Ln this tlpe of
waEtewater flow.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AIINED
REFEREITCE DOCUlIEllll8 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProteetionReport Septenber 7997
O uNrr rrrrnBER: 2s4
I,NII t OCIIEIOIS U-117
IrNIT DE8CRIPAIOUs Surface Water Discharge and OId Drrmell
Irocation
Surface water discharge generated by Baltinore Air CoiI
(BAC) cooling, boiler condensate, boiler blowdown, anda water softener. The discharge fomerly was to adr1mell and then to the ground surface where itevaporates/percolates. The dr1nrell has been removed
and the discharge is to the ground surface forevaporation/percolation. The boiler has been removedfrom this building and stean is piped from U-39/!{-14Iines.
IiANAGED IA8IEST Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAIT VOI/IrUE DISCEIRGED3 900, 000 gallons
O oPEReEroNerr DaEE83 1960 to Present; Drlmell removed in 1988
PREVIOUS IIrVEETIGATIONS s
Analytical data is available for saupling events dated
01-30-87, 04-17-88 and 11-17-88 ln the report titledThiokol Cornoration Ground Water ouality Protectl,onReport. September 1991.
RFA RECOIIIIENDAIIOITS s
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8II![UEII!8 Of COXCERIIS Antimony and pH
IITVESEIGESION PfrAI{g :
This site will be investigated according to the Surface
Discharge SoiI Sarnnling Plan for the constituentE of
concern.
O RETERBNcE DoclruErltrs:
lfhLokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Reoort, September 1991
IrNIT NIII,IBER: 260
I,NI![ IJOCIBION: }.T-53BP
IrNIT DE8CRIPIION: Surface Water Discharge and Old DrWeIl
Location
This unit consists of surface water dJ,scharged fromlaboratory sinks on the south side of building M-53.
The discharge also contains BAC cooling and boiler
condensate. A dr1mell was removed from this Eite in
L987, dt which time the wastewaters began discharginginto a storm collection system.
IiAIIAGED rA8EE83 Industrial wastewater
ANltUAf. VOLITUE DISCEARGBDs 5O2,000 gallons
OPERAIIONIL, DAIES: 1950s - Present
PREVIOU8 NTVESEIGATIONS :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
02-06-87, 04-18-88, 05-10-88 and 01-24-9L in the reporttitled Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv
Protection Report, September 1991.
RFA RBCOUltEtlDilfIOtrS 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSEIIUENA8 Ol CONCERNI Volatile organics, Bis(2-ethylhexyl)Phthalate, nitrobenzene, mercury and
pH
TIwESTTCAIION PLIXE 3
The former drlmell location will be inveEtigated
according to the Injection Well SoiI Sampling PIan forthe constituents of concern. The current surface
discharge from this unit will also be investigated
according to the plan subnitted in the Surface
Discharge section (see unit no. 2601.
REFERENCE DOCI'T{ET5TS :
l[hLokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectLon
Reoort, Septenber 1991
O lrurr ruuBER: 2ss
uxlr Loctrrol: T-2ua
Uf,I E8CRIP!!IOX3 Buildinq Discharqe to a Shallow Iniection Well
Bullding wastewater discharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow inJectionwell.
l[lltACED IA8AES: Industrial llaEtewater
EXilIrnIr VOLITIIE DISCEARGEDS lOOr0OO gallons
OPERITIOIIAL DATEE: 1984 - Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTIGATTOf,8 :
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
02-05-87 in the report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality ProtectLon ReEr>rt Septenber 7997.
Rtl RECOIiXEIIDaIIOXS r
Initiate a samplLng prograu to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COUSAITUEME OI COXCERIT:
There are no eonstituents which exceed the ninimum ofthe standard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regulatory, Health and Risk Based Standards), or exceedthe surface water and ground water quality levels shownin Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality atThiokol).
IIIVES:IIEAIITOX PTrAXEs NO FT,RTHER ACTION TS PI,A}INED
REIEREICE DOCUTIEUTS 3
Thiokol Corgoration Ground gilater ouallty protection
Reoort. Seotenber 7997
T,NTT NI,TIBER: 326
IIUIS LOCILTfOII: E-515
UXIA DE8CRfDUOII Former Buildincr Discharcre to a French Drain
Former building wastewater discharge generated by ametrology laboratory. The discharge was to a French
Drain until 1990 at which time the discharge waE routedto the wastewater treatnent facility at E-534.
TTATTAGED fAgTES:Industrial Wastewater
ATNTUII! VOLUUE DISCEARGED: UNKNOWN
OPERISfOIIAIT DAIEE: L962 - September 1990
PRE|ITIOUS IIIVESTICA|IIOilS 3
This site has been investigated under the U.S. Air ForcefnEtallation and Restoration Program (IRP). Work on thesite has included soil sanpling, grognd water sanpling,
and geophysical surveys. Results of these lnvestigations
are detailed in the report title InstaTTation Restoration
Program. II.S. Nr Force Plant 78.
RtA RECOUUEIIDAATOf,8 s
Soll and ground water sanpling in the irnnediate area and
downgrradient with remediation as indicated by analysis.
CON8EITUETTTS OT COilCERTT:
ITVEStrTGAIIOX PITINS:
Refer to the fRP Reports
Any further investigation at this site will be conducted
undei the IRP.
NO ADDITIONAL AETION IS PI,AIINED AS PART OF 1[IIE RFI.
O RETERETcE DoculrEltrss
ThLokol Corporation Ground Water oualLty ProtectTonReport Septenber 7997i InstaTTation RestoratLon Program
U.S. Nr Torce Plant 78
I,NIT NUilBERI 353
UNIT IJOCATIOXs T-534
ITNM DE8CRIPIIOf,T Building Discharge to a Shallow Injection WeII
Building wastewater discharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow inJectionwell.
IIT.A}IAGED WA8TE8:Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAL VOI,I,UE DISCEARGED: 300 r 000 gallons
OPERATIONAIJ DATES s 1984 r Present
PREVIOUS IITVBSTIGAIIOITS 3
Analytical data is not available for this specificunit; however, the wastewater flow fron this source issubstantially identical to other boiler building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water ouality Protection Renort, September 1991contains a summary of the average boiler building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOU}TETTDATTONS :
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETSI8 OF CONCERN:
MVE8TIGATfON PL*AI{S:
Antimony, lead and pH
This site will be investigated accordlng to theIniection Well SoiI Sannling PIan for the constituentsof concern.
REFERENCE DOCIruETTTS:
Thiokol Corporation Ground lilater oualitv Protection
Report. September 1991
T,NIT NT,UBER: 354
IINIT IJOCAIfON: T-974
IntIT DEgcRIPIIof,: Buildinq Discharge to a Shallow rniection WelI
Building wastewater discharge generated by boLler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow inJectlon well.
UIIITAGED WA8TE8:Industrial Wastewater
A}INUAL VOITIruE DI8CEARGED: 29O r 000 gallons
OPERATIONAIJ DATEE:April L987 - Present
PREVTOU8 IISVESTTGAATON8 3
Analytical data is not available for this specifl.c unitihowever, the wastewater flow frou this source Lssubstantially identical to other boiler bulldlng
discharges which have analytical sampling data availabLe.The report titled Thiokol Corporation Ground Waterouality Protection Report, Septenber 1991 contalns a
summary of the average boiler bullding wastewater
eff luent concentrations.
RFA RECOUUETTDATIONS 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETTTS OF CONCERil:
IIWE8TIGAIIOII PIIAI{8 3
REFERENCE DOCUUEI{tr8:
Antimony, lead and pH
rhis site will be investigated according to the rniection
WeII Soil Samplinq Plan for the constituents of concern.
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectLon
Report. September 1991
I,NIT NT,UBER: 355
IINIT ITOCATIOf,I T-111
IrNII DESCRIPAIOtr! Building Discharge to a Sha].Iow Iniection WeII
Building wastewater discharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a waterEoftener. The discharge is to a shallow inJecttonwell.
T{,A}IAGED TA8TES:Industrial $Iastewater
AII.UAIT VOITUUE DISCEARGED: 503 r 000 gallons
OPERATIONAIT DATE8S August L987 to Present
PREVIOUS IISVESSICArIONS 3
Analytical data is not available for this speclfJ,cunit; however, the wastewater flow from this source issubstantially identical to other boiler building
discharges which have analytical sanpling dataavailable. The report titled ThLokol Corporatlon
Ground Water ouality Protection Report, Septenber 1991
contains a summary of the average boiler building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOUUETTDATTONS:
Initiate a sanpling progran to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUETTI8 OF CONCERN:
MVE8TfGATfON PITAIIS:
Sulfate and pH
This site will be investlgated according to thefnjection WeII SolI Samplinq PIan for the constLtuentsof concern.
REFERENCE DOCT'T{ETTtr8 :
Thiokol Corooration Ground Water ouality Protection
Report. September 1991
T,NTT NT,I{BERg 395
IrNIT LOCAEIOII: ![-348
IINII DEgCRIPTIOtts Building Discharge to a Shallow Iniection I{eII
Building wastewater discharge generated by boller
condensate, boiler blondown, BAC cooling, once-through
cooling, an eyewash and a water softener. The dischargeis to a shallow injection well.
ITIAIIAGED fAgTES:fndustrial Wastewater
ADINUAL VOLT I{E DI8CEARGED: 752 ,440 gallons
OPERATfONAIT DATES: October L987 - Present
PREIIIOU8 IlwEgrIGlrrONg 3
Analytical data is not available for this specifJ.c unlt;however, the wastewater flow from this source lssubstantially identical to other boller building
discharges which have analytical sampling data available.The report titled Thiokol Corporation Ground Waterouality Protection Renort. Sentember 1991 contains a
summary of the average boiler building wastewater
ef f luent concentrations.
RFA RBCOUIiIENDA.IION8 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETTII8 OF CONCERTI:
MVESIIGATfON PLAIIE:
RETERENCB DOCTIIITETTtrE :
Antimony, lead and pH
This site wiII be investigated according to the Injectlon
WeII Soil Samplincr PIan for the constituents of concern.
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, Septenber 1991
IINTT NI'U8EBS 397
I,NIT IJOCArIOtrs T.15A
IrNIT DBgCBIP[IOtts Building Discharcre to a Shallow fnJectLon Well
Building wastewater dlscharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow inJection
wel1.
TTADIAGED TA8TE8:Industrial Wastewater
AIMUAL VOIJITUE DI8CEARGED: 273 r 500 gallons
OPERATfONAIT DATES:1984 - Present
PREVTOUS IIT\IE8rIGArION8 :
Analytical data is not available for this specLficuniti however, the wastewater flow from this Eource issubstantially identical to other boiler building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water oualitv Protection Report. September 1991
contains a summary of the average boiler buildlng
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RFA RECOI{I{EITDAtrIONS 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CON8TITUETTTS Otr CONCERN:
ITTVESTIGATTON PIflTT8 :
Antimony, lead and pH
This site will be investigated aceording to theInieetlon Well Soil Sampling Plan for the constltuentsof concern.
REFERBNCB DOCI'UETTtrS :
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Report. September 1991
rrf,Ir fuuBEBs 398
UIII f.OClrlOtrs T-17
UIIT DEgCnfPTfOils Bearincr Pressure Test Discharqe to a ShaIIowInjection l{ell
Wastevater discharge generated by pressure testing ofshuttle bearings. The discharge is to a pit inJectionwelI.
lllltlGBD IlAllEgr Industrial Wastewater
AIIXUAL YOLUIIE DISCEABGED: 2O8,000 gallons
OPERIIIOIIIIT DAIE8. L982 - Present
PREVIOU8 rtwESSfGAUONg 3
Analytical data is available for a sanpllng event dated
08-08-91 in the report titled Thiokol CorwratLon
Ground Water Ouality Protection Report. Septenber 7997.
RFA BECOUIIEITDATTONS !
Initiate a sampling prograu to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposaL.
COXSSIEUgllllg Ol COlfCErut3
There are no constituents which exceed the uinimum ofthe standard levels shown in Table 1 (Relevant
Regrulatory, Hea1th and Risk BaEed Staridards), or exceedthe surface water and ground water quality Levels shownin Table 2 (Surface and Ground Water Quality at
Thiokol) .
ITVESIIC}TTOTT PT.IXS: NO FI,RTHER ASTION IS PI,AIINED
REIEREf,CE DOCUUEN]ISS
Thiokol Corporat,ion Ground Water ouall,tv ProtectionReport Segtenber 7997
I,NI8 ilI,UBERS 401
U}{IE ITOCAEfOXS T-244
ITNME8CRIPIIOil: Building Discharge to a Shall.ow Iniection Well
Building wastewater discharge generated by boller
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow injectionwell.
Td.AIIAGED TA8TES:Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAIJ VOLT UE DISCEARGED: 324 r 000 gallons
OPERAEIONAL DATES:1984 - Present
PREIVIOU8 fIIVE8IIGITION8 !
Analytical data is not available for this speciflcunit; however, the wastewater flow from thls source lssubstantially identical to other boiler bulldlng
discharges which have analytl.cal sampll.ng dataavailable. The report titled thiokol Corporatlon
Ground Waler ouality Protection Renort, Septenber 1991contains a summary of the average boiler building
wastewater effluent concentrations.
R8A RECOUIIEIIDAIIONS s
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUENI8 OF CONCERN:
IIIVE8TIGATfON PITAIIS :
Antimony, lead and pH
This site will be investigated according to theInjection WeII Soil Sannlinq Plan for the constltuentsof concern.
REFERENCE DOCT'UETTI8 :
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protection
Report, September 1991
I'NIT NT'I{BERS 4O2
t t{IT IrOCAffOt3 T-51A
Irlrrr DEgcRIPrrott! Buildincl Discharqe to a Shallow Iniection Well
Building wastewater discharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow injectionwell.
tLANecED f,egTE8: Industrial Wastewater
ANIIUAIr VOIrIrliE DfBCEARCEDI 31O, 0OO gallons
OPERAUONAIJ DAEES: Early 1950s to Present
PREIVIOU8 IITVESIIGATIONS :
Analytical data is not available for thls specificunit; however, the wastewater flow frou this source issubstantially identical to other boiler building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water oualitv Protection Report, September 1991
contains a summary of the average boiler bullding
wastewater effluent concentrations.
RrA RECOU!{EIIDAIIOI{S 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONBIIIUEIIEE Ol CONCERIIs Antinony, Iead and pH
MVESIICATION PLII{8I
This =it" will be investigated according to theIn'iection l{ell Soil Sanplincr Plan for the constituentsof concern.
RETERENCE DOCINiENTS3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
I'NIT
uxrtr
UXIT
TTI,TTBER: 423
LOCA'IfOX: l{-508-2
DEgcRfP![IOt: Buildinq DiEcharcrsto a Drainfield
Building wastewater discharge generated by x-ray photo
processing, once-through cooling and a water softener.This drainfield was abandoned in 1989 at which tine therinEe water and spent developer were collected and
disposed to Blue Creek under Thiokolrs ITPDES permit andthe fixer solution collected for silver recovery.
TTITTAGED TA TE8:Industrial Wastewater
Af,[UeIr VOLUIIE DfgCElRcBDs 1, 300, 000 gallons
OPERATfOII}L DATE8S 1985 - 1989
PREVIOUE TNVESTIGATIONS :
This site is currently under
SoiJ,s Studv Plan.
investigation as part of a
RFA RECOUTIETTDI|TIONS :
Soil and ground water sanpling with remediation as
indicated by analysis.
In April L987, Morton Thiokol entered into a Stipulation
and Consent Order with the Utah Solid and Hazardous WaEte
Cornnittee (Case Nos. 85O2L62, 8606402) in regards toseveral discharge areas. Morton Thiokol agrreed toinvestigate these areas in a SolTs Study Plan and tobegin closure activities based on the findings and
conclusions of the Conmittee. Environmental activitiesat this site will proceed as specified in the Stipulation
and Consent order.
NO N)DITIONAL ACTION IS PI,AIINED AS PART OF THE RFI.
COIISIITUETUTS OF CONCERTI:Cadmiun, chromitrm and silver
ITTVESETGATION PL}I{8 :
O RETEREtr.E Docu,rE.Irtss
ThLokol Corooration Ground llater oualLty Protection
Report- Septenber 7997
T'NIT
T'NIT
T'NTT
nt tiBER! 436
LOCAAIOtrt I-10S8
DEBCRIPTIOU! Southeast Sink Drvwell
This unit consists of a drlmell located approximately20 ft east of building f -10. Of the two drlnrrells onthe east side of building I-10, this is the one to thesouth. The dr1meIl receives wastewater from theIaboratory sinks.
IIA!{AGED f,A8TE8l Industrial Wastewater
Al{NUAf,' VOIrIrltE DISCEARGED: 93, 0OO gallons
OPERAIIONAIJ DA!f883 Nov 1962 - Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated05-11-88, in the report titled Thiokol CorporatLon
Ground Water ouality Protection Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOUITEITDAIIION8 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETTTS OT CONCERN:
fIwESTfGATION Pf.,aXS :
Volatile organics
This site will be investigated according to theInjection Well Soil Samplina Plan for the constituentsof concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'ITEIITS:
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport, September 1991
REFEREI\ICE DOCW:
Thiokol Cor?oruion Growd Waer Oualit! Protection Rewrt. September 1991
T,NIIT I|UUBERS 446
III{IT ITOCAAIOXS T-3
IrNIII DEgcRIPEIoN.s Building Discharge to a Shallow rnJection well
Building wastewater discharge generated by bollercondensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow injection weIl.
T{AIIAGED WAETE8:fndustrial Wastewater
AIINUAL VOLUITE Df8CEARGED: 112,O0O gallons
OPERATfONAL DATES: September 1990 - Present
PRWIOI'8 IITVESTIGAIIION8 3
Analytical data is not available for thiE specific unit;however, the wastewater flow fron this Eource issubstantially identical to other boiler bulldlng
discharges which have analytical sanpling data available.The report titled Thiokol Corooration Ground Wateroualitv Protection Report. SeBtenber 1991 contains a
summary of the average boiler building waEtewatereffluent concentrations.
RFA RECOIOIENDITIONS s
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUETTI8 OT CONCERN:
IITVE8TIGATTOII PLAI{8 :
REFERENCE DOCT'UENII8:
Antimony, lead and pH
This site will be investigated according to the fniection
WeLl Soil SarnplinqPIan for the constituents of concern.
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
UNII ITUUBER: 503
UUfT LOCjIIIOX: E-519
UXIA DE8CRIPEIOI: Former Buildinq Discharcre to a French Drain
Fomer building wastewater dLscharge generated bylaboratory. The building no longer functions as
Iaboratory and the French Drain has been abandoned.
TTATTAGED TA88E8:fndustrial Wastewater
ANTTUAL VOLUUE DTSCEARGED: UnKnown
OPERATfOIIAL DAIES:1960s - Early L970s
PNEN/IOU8 TTVESTTGAAION8 3
This site has been investigated under the U.S. Air ForceInstallation and Restoration Progrram (IRP). Work on thesite has included soil sanpling, ground water sampling,
and geophysical surveys. Results of these investLgations
are detailed in the report title InstaTTation Restoration
Program, U.S. Air Force Plant 78.
RIA RECOUIIETTDATTONS :
Soil and ground water sanpling in the innediate area and
downgradient with remediation aE indicated by analysis.
COTTSTITUETTtrS Otr Refer to the fRP Reports
ImTEgEfCAlfOI Pf.llrg s
Any further investigation at this site will be conducted
under the IRP.
NO N)DITIONAL ACTION IS PI,ANNED AS PART OT' THE RFI.
RETEREITCE DOCI'I{EIE8 :
ThLokol CorEpration Ground Water Ouality ProtectionRepnrt Septenber 7997; InstaTTation RestoratLon Program.A.S. Air Force Plant 78
a
a
TINIT TTUTI8ER, I 558
UNII LOCATIOII T-51A-1
IINII DESCRfPUOII: Old Dry t{ell
This unit is an old dry weII which received wastewater
generated by boiler condensate, boiler blowdown, BACcooling and a water softener. fn Septenber 1990, thedry well was removed for buildlng nodifications and
e:<pansion.
TTATTAGED TA8TES:Industrial l{astewater
OPERATIOIIAL DATEE: Early 1960's to Present
PREVIOUE TIIVESIICAAIONS s
Two soil samples were taken at the tl.ne the drlmell was
removed, a composite of the soil below the dry well anda background sample. The resultE of the analysis
showed no volatile organics detected in either sample.
RECOltllEltDl![IOII8 !
rnitiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
rTWESIIGATION PI.ATTS g
The analytical data obtained
activities has shown that all
below detection linits.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PLAIINED
REFERENCE DOCI,}TETftr8 :
T-57 SoiT Sample Analysis;
during soil samplingvolatile orgranics were
FOR THE RFT.
I'NItr ITI'UBERS 608
IrNIT LOCaIIOUS ltt-338
IrNII! DEgCnIPTIOttT Buildino Discharqe to a Shallow fnlection Well
Building wastewater discharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallow injection well.
UAIIAGED TA8TES:Industrial Wastewater
AIINUAL VOITIruE DISCEARGED: 630, 000 gallons
OPERATIONAI, DATES:1989 - Present
PRE\IIOU8 IITVESTIGErIONS !
Analytical data is not available for this specif5.c unlt;however, the wastewater flow from this aource lssubstantially identicaL to other boiler bullding
discharges which have analytical sampling data avaLlable.The report titled Thiokol Corporation Ground Wateroualitv Protection Report, September 1991 contains a
summary of the average boiler building wastewater
ef f luent concentrations .
RFA RECOT{UETTDATTONS :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUET$I8 OF CONCERN:
MESTIGATION PIIA}IS:
REFERENCE DOCT,IITETUTS S
Antimony, lead and pH
this site will be investigated according to the Inlection
WeIt SoiI SamolLncr Plan for the constituents of concern.
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv ProtectLon
Report. September 1991
I,NI[ NI,UBERS 609
IINIT ITOCABIOUI !,I-9NE
UNr! DB8CRIPIIOf,S Abandoned DrSreIl
This unit consisted of a drlmell located north east ofbuilding l{-9. The dr1nrrell in the past has received
wastewater from laboratories and possibly photographic
processes.
ITAIIACED f,A8TEg:
Wastewaters flowing into the drlmell may have containedmercury, volatile organics, silver, cadmium, andpossibly very small quantities of chromium and lead.
ANNUAIT VOIrIrltE Df8CEARGBD3 Unknown
OPERATIONIIT DAIESI 1960's
PREVIOU8 IIwESSIOATION8 t None
RfA RECOIIIIEIIDAIIIONBs This unit was not addressed in the
RFA report
CON8IIEUBNA8 Of CONCBRT{: Mercury, volatile organlcs, cadmiun,
chromitrm, silver and lead
IITVESTIGAIION PLETS:
This 'site will be investigated according to theInjection Well Soil Samplinq PIan for the conEtltuentEof concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'UEITTSS
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality ProtectionReport, September 1991
I'NIE ITI'UBEBS 624
T,NIT I,OCAEIOT3 T-514-S
IINII DE8CRIPTION: Bullding Discharge to a Drwell
This unit is an old dry well which receives wastewater
generated by washing of uechanical eguipment. The
discharge is to a shallow dr1mell.
IIBIIACED f,lAAE8: Industrial Wastewater
emrUeL VOLITUE DISCEARGED! Not available
OPERIIIIOIIAIT DefE83 1964 - Present
PRBYIOU8 IIWESTTGAIION8 :
Analytical data is not available for thls speciflcunit.
RTA RECOId}TEIIDAIION8 3
Initiate a saupling prograu to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSIITUEII!8 Otr CONCERIT!
fXVE8EfGAEION PIreilSs
Investigation activities at this site will focus onobtaining a sample of the wastewater discharge foranalysLs. A dye study will be conducted to determinethe discharge location as well as reviewing buildingconstruction details and interviewing buildingcontacts. The sanpling data will be evaluated usingthe same assessment approach used for the otherdischarges. The need for additional investigation will
be determined following this initial lrork.
RETERENCE DOCIMEN!8 !
ThLokol Corpnration Ground Water OualLty ProtectLon
Report. Septetrber 7997
UTTIT TSUTTBER: 536
IINIT lrOcll[fOIs T-514-2
uxMEgCRIPEIoxs Buildinq Discharcre to a Shallow Iniection Well
Building wastewater discharge generated by boiler
condensate, boiler blowdown, BAC cooling and a watersoftener. The discharge is to a shallos injection weII
which was installed in 1990 to replace an old injectionwell removed to accomnodate renodeling and e:<pansion ofthe building.
ttAltAcED IAa![88: Industrial Wastewater
altltuAl VOLUIiE DISCEARGEDS 310r000 gallons
OPERIAIO!!I& DAAE83 1990 to Present
PREVIOU8 IIwEBAIGAIIOII8 3
Analytical data is not available for this specificunit; however, the wastewater flow from this source issubstantially identical to other boiler building
discharges which have analytical sampling dataavailable. The report titled Thiokol Corporation
Ground Water Ouality ProtectLon Report. Seotenber 7997
contains a summary of the average boiler building
wastewater effluent concentrationE.
naA REeouuEtrDtrrolt8:
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
COf,SrIfUEma Ol COltCERl[: Antinony and lead
rl5YESrIGtTrOn pr.Nre:
This site will be investigated according to theInieetion We77 Soil Sanpling Plan for the constituentsof concern.
RETEREf,CE DOCUT{ET|!!8 :
ThTokoI Corporation Ground g[ater ouality ProtectLonReoort Segtenber 7997
I,NTT NI,UBEBS 640
IrNIf IrOCl![IOtrs l{-gSW
ITNMB8CRIPAIOX3 Abandoned Drrmell
This unit consisted of a dr1mell located south east ofbuildlng ![-9. The dr1meIl in the past has received
wastewater from laboratories and possibly photographic
procegses.
ITAIIAGED f,48.!883
Iilastewaters flowing into the drywell may have containedmercury, volatile organics, silver, cadmium, andpossibly very small quantities of chromium and lead.
ANNUAIT VOL'IilE Df8CEARGED3 Unknown
OPERATIONAIT DATE83 195O's
PREVIOUE IITVESTIGAIIION8: None
RFA RECOUIIEIIDAtrION8: This unit was not addressed in the
RFA report
CON8!I'IEUEN!!8 OF COltCERtt! Mercury, volatile organics, cadmJ.um,
chromium, silver and lead
TNVESTIGATION PLN{83
This'site will be investigated according to theInjection WeII SoiI Sannlino Plan for the conetltuentsof concern.
REFERENCE DOCT'}IET!83
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water ouality Protection
Report, September 1991
IrNfT NIII,IBER: 643
IINI1I IJOCAIfON: !{-9SE
IrNII DE8CRIPIfOilS Abandoned Drlrwell
This unit consisted of a dr1meIl located south east ofbuilding M-9. The drlmell in the past has received
wastewater from laboratories and possibly photogrraphic
processes.
I{A}IAGED f,48tr88:
Wastewaters flowing into the dr1meIl may have contained
mercury, volatile organics, silver, cadmium, andpossibly very small quantities of chromium and lead.
MlfUAIr VOfrIrllE DISCEARCED! Unknown
OPERAtrfONAIT DAIE83 1960's
PREVIOU8 NTVESTTGATIONE :
RFA RECOUUETTDATIONS:
CONSTITUEITI8 OF CONCERNs
MVESIIGATION PLlt{8:
REFERENCE
None
This unit was not addressed in the
RFA report
Mercury, volatile organics, cadmium,
chromium, silver and lead
This site will be investigated according to thefniection WeIL Soil Sampling Plan for the constituentsof concern.
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water oualitv Protectl.on
Report. September 1991
O uNrr NrrrrrBERr 64s
IINIT IJOCATfOil: f-1ONE
UilIlI DE8CRIPUONs Northeast Sink Drvwell
This unit consists of a dqmell located approxinately
20 ft east of building I-10. Of the two drlnrells onthe east side of building I-10, this is the one to thenorth. The drywell receives wastewater from thelaboratory sinks.
I{,AIIAGED fe8[88: Industrial l{astewater
ANNUAIT VOITUUE DI8CEARGED3 93,000 gallons
OPERATIOITAI, DATE83 NOV Lg62 - Present
PREVXOU8 ilVESTIGAIION8 s
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated05-29-92, which was following submittal of the reporttitled Thiokol Corporation Ground Water OualitvProtection Report, September 1991.
RFA RECOUI.TEITDATTONS 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardouEconstituents are escaping proper dl.sposal.
CONgfIfUEil![8 Of COIICERIII Cadmium
IIWESIIIGATIOII PIJINS !
This site will be investigated according to theInjection Well Soil Sanpling PIan for the constituentsof concern.
RETERENCE DOCI'IiENT83
Thiokol CorBoration Ground Water Ouality ProtectLon
Report. Septenber 1991
otrl,U}{Hct
tr,
eHzEH
trlr.tr,
Ut
oF
H
(,
It,
UTII NT,UBBR3 465
IrNIT LOC]A'IIOXS ltt-2-1
IINII DESCRIPIIIONs Abandoned Laundrv Septic Tank and Drainfield
This unit consisted of a septic tank and drainfield
which received both domestic and industrial wastewater
generated by the Thiokol laundry as well as wastewater
flows from photo processing at building M-9. In 1975,the domestic flow was diverted to Drainfield A to the
west of the administration area, and the laundry
wastewater was diverted to a new drainfield designated
as M-2-2.
ttAttlcED fAg![ES: Domestic and industrial Wastewater
lIINUAIJ VOIJITIiE DI8CEARGED! <2 1875, O00
OPERATIONAIT DA[88! Nov L962 L975
PREVIOUS IITVESTIGAIIONS 3
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
oL-24-9L in the report titled Thiokol Cortrnrat,ion
Ground Water Ouality Protect,ion Report. September 7997.
This analysis represents the flow currently discharged
by the laundry facility.
RFA RECOUIIEITDATIONS 3
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSIIITUEIIII8 Otr CONCERtts Volatile organics, cadnium,
chromium, silver, Iead and pH
INVESTIGATION PI,ANS:
This site will be investigated according to the !f-2
Laundry Draintields SanpTing PIan for the constituentsof concern.
O RETEREIcE DocurdErrlr8:
Thtokol Corporation Ground Water oualLty ProteetLonReport Septenber 7997
utul ttuxBBns 625
IrltIE I,oCIIIIOIS l{-153
IrNIf DEBCRIP|BION: Domestic Wastewater Drainfields A' B. and C
Drainfield systen which receives domestic wastewater
flows from the following buildings: A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4,
al-2, M-3, M-5, M-6, il-8, M-9, U-10, !{-15, I{-35, lq-52,
M-53, Ir{-54, Ir{-55, Ir{-58, lq-?9, U-86, !{-90, Ir[-111, Ir[-113,
It-L72, U-L76, lq,-L79, It{-189, U-335 and U-337.
UANAGED TASTE8:Domestic wastewater and some industrial
wastewater
43 ,800, O0O gallonsATINUAIJ VOIJT,UE DI 8CEARGED :
OPERATIONEI. DATES: DrainfieldDrainfield
Drainf ield
PREVIOUS I}TVESTIGATIONS :
L975 - Present
L982 - Present
L987 - Present
Analytical data is available for many of the industrial
wastewater discharges from the buildings which in thepast have contributed industrial wastewater flow to
these drainfields. This data is contained in thereport titled ThioRoI Corpration Ground Water OualLtyProtection Report Septenber 1,997.
nFn RECOldltEttDAIrONg s
Establish a program to assure hazardous constituentsare not introduced into the septic system and verifythe absence of hazardous constituents in the septic
system.
CONSIIITUEIIIS Of -CONCBRII: Volatile organics, Boron, Bis(2-
ethylhexyl) Phthalate, cadmium, chromitrm,lead, mercury, nitrobenzene, and silver
IM/ESTTGAIION PI,AT{S:
This site will be investigated according to the
Domestic Wastewater Draintields A B and C Sampling
Plan for the constituents of concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'IIEIITS 3
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv ProtectionReport Septenber 7997
T'NIT NTITTBER: 626
I,OCATION: tr{-2-2
DEBCRIPTIONs Abandoned Laund
TINIT
I'NIT
rhis unit consisted of a septic tank and drainfield
which received only industrial wastewater generated bythe Thiokol laundry. In 1989, this drainfield was
blpassed because of the increased load of laundry
wastewater, and the wastewater was diverted to a newdrainfield designated as M-2-3.
I{,ATIAGED TA8TES:Industrial Wastewater
ETINUAIJ VOLUT{E DI SCEARGED :12,875 r 000
OPERATIOIIAL DATES: L975 - 1.989
PRE\IIOU8 IITVESTTGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
oL-24-9L in the report titled ThiokoT Corporation
Ground Water Ouality Protection Repprt. Septenber 7997.This analysis represents the flow currently discharged
by the laundry facility.
RFA NECOUI.TENDIIIONSS
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUETTI8 OF CONCERN:Volatile organics, cadmium,
chromium, silver, Iead and pH
IIIVESTIGAiIIOIT PIJAITS !
This site will be investigated according to the E?Laundry Drainfields Samplinq Plan for the constituentsof concern.
NEFBRENCB DOCUITEII'|I8 :
T'NIT ITI'I.TBERS 627
uttrr locAalox3 M-2-3
IrNII DE8CRIPIION3 Laundr-I, Septic Tanl< and Drainfield
This unit consists of a septic tank and drainfield
which currently receives the industrial wastewater
generated by the Thiokol laundry.
IIAIIAGED f,lgllES: Industrial Wastewater
ANNUIIJ VOITITUE DISCEARGED: 2,875 r 000 gallons
OPERIIIIONAIT DAfEgi L989 - Present
PREVIOUS IMTESTIGATIONS !
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
oL-24-9L in the report titled Thiohol Corporation
Ground Water Oualitv Protection Rercrt Seotember 7997.
RFA RECOUITENDATIONSS
Initiate a sarnpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSIITUEIIIS Otr CONCERNs Volatile organics, cadmium,
chromium, silver, Iead and pH
IWESTIGATION PI,ANS:
This site will be investigated according to t-}re IiI-2
Laundry Drainfields Sanpling Plan for the constituentsof concern.
REFERENCE DOCI'UEIIT83
Thiokol Corporation Ground Water Oualitv Protection
Report. Septenber 199L
UITIT NI,I{BER3 628
IrNrE roclrlof,s !{-19A
UtIf DESCRIP'IION3 Seotic Tank and Drainfield System
This unit consists of a septic tank/drainfield system
which prior to 1988 received both domestic wastewater
and industrial wastewater from floor drains within thebuilding. In 1988, the floor drains were plugged withgrout to prevent discharging to the septictank/drainfield system.
T{,A}IAGED WASTES:Domestic and industrial Wastewater
AIINUAIT VOITUUE DI SCHARGED :L7 6, 0OO gallons
OPERATTONAL DATES: L96Os - Present
PREVIOUS IIIVESIIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
11-16-88 in the report titled Thiokol Corwration
Ground Water Oualitv Protection Report. Seotember 7997.
this data is representative of only the current
discharge and not of the previous operations perfomed
within this building.
RFA RECOT,TUENDAT IONS :
rnitiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUETUTS OF CONCERN:Cadmium, silver, chromium, nickel
and lead
fNVE8TIGATION PLAIIS:
This site will be investigated according to Xl;le I4-79A
Septic Drainfield Sanpling Plan for the constituents of
concern.
REFEREUCE DOCIMEiltr8:
Thlokol Corporation Ground Water Ouality ProtectionReoort. Septenber 7997
T,NTT NT,UBER: 629
IINIT IrOClSfOf,: U-57
Irf,If DE8CRfPEIOX: Septie Tanl< and Drainfield Svsten
This unit consists of a septic tank/dralnfield system
Iocated approxinately 50 ft. northsest of building M-5?. Historically, the floor drain in this building was
connected to the septic tank/drainfield, but wasgrouted over in 1988 to prevent material fron enteringthe septic system. Only domeEtic wastewater is
discharged to the septic system.
ltAltAcED II8TE8: Donestic and industrial Wastewater
IIIIUAL VOfrUtlE Df8CEARGED3 <1461000 gallons
OPERISIOIIAL, DAIES: March 1963 - Present
O PREvrous rnvEstrrcArroNs:
Analytical data is available for a sanpling event dated
01-25-91 in the report titled Thiokol CorEpratlon
Ground Water OuaTity Protection Report- Septenber 7997.This data is representative of the industrial
wastewater which is currently discharged to the ground
surface.
RtA RECOuttEtDtArOf,S 3
Initiate a sanpling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
coNsTISUEtr!8 0' COUCERII!
IIYESATGIAIOII EI.NT8 S
There is no evidence to indicate that any industrial
flowE have been discharged into the septic system.
NO FT'RTTIER ACTION IS PI,ANNED
O RETEREf,cE DocrrrdErrrs:
ThLokol CorppratLon Ground Water oualLty ProtectionRaport September 7997
I,NIT ITI,ITBER3 530
I'NIT LOCArION. YI-72
IINII DESCRIPIIIONs Septic Tank and Drainfield System
This unit consists of a septic tank/drainfield system
Iocated approximately 50 ft. south of buildLng lt-72. A
sink and a floor drain within this building nay have
allowed industrial wastewater to enter the septic
system. The room containing the sink and the floor
drain currently functions as a break room with nopotential for industrial wastewater flow to enter the
septic system.
ItAllAcED fAgIES: Domestic and industrial Wastewater
AIINUAIT VOLITUE DISCEARGED: 173,000 gallons
OPERATIONAIT DATES3 unknown
PREVIOUA III\IESIIIGATIONS :
Analytical data is available for sampling events dated
OL-29-87, 05-24-88 and 01-24-9L in the report titled
Thiokol Corooration Ground Water Ouality ProtectionRewrt, September L991,. This data represents thecurrent industrial wastewater flow discharging to the
ground surface and not necessarily the industrial
wastewater which may enter the septic system.
RFA RECOIII,TEITDAtrIONS !
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTIIIUENE8 Otr CONCERNs Arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
copper, lead, nickel, thallium,zinc, volatile organics
IIMESTIGATION PIJAT{8 s
This site will be investigated according to the SepticDraintields Receiving Industrial WastewaterInvestigation Plan.
REFERENCE DOCI'ITBITTS :
Thiokol CorEnration Ground Water Ouality ProtectionReport Septenber L997
I'NIT IIUUBER3 63].
IrltIT I{,CAIIONS M-19L-S
IINII DE8CRIPTION: Septic Tank and Drainfield Svstem
This unit consists of a septic tank/drainfield systenr
which receives both domestic and industrial wastewaterflows. The industrial flow consists of building
washdown, casting pit washdown, BAC cooling, boiler
condensate, and once-through cooling.
tiANAcED fA8![E8: Domestic and industrial Wastewater
AIIIIUAIT VOIrIrllE DISCEARGED3 173,000 gallons
OPERATIONAIJ DArES3 March 1985 - Present
PREVIOU8 IIIVE8IIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for a saurpling event dated
08-28-92.
RFE RECOI{ITENDAIIONS s
fnitiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSIITUENIS OF CONCERN3 Beryllium, cadmium, mercury,thalliun
ITIVESTIGATION PI..AT{8 3
This site will be investigated according to the SeptjcDraintields Receiving Industrial WastewaterInvestigation Plan.
UNIT NTIIIIBER: 632
I,NIT I,oCATION: M.193 N
IrltIT DESCRIPIIONs Septic Tank and Drainfield Svstem
This unit consists of a septic tank/drainfield system
which receives both domestic and industrial wastewater
flows. The industrial flow consists of building
washdown, casting pit washdown, BAC cooling, boiler
condensate, and once-through cooling.
TI.ATIAGED WASTES:Domestic and industrial Wastewater
AIINUAIT VOITUI{E DI SCHARGED :<L0, 0OO gallons
OPERATIONAL DATES: September L987 - Present
PREVIOUS IM/ESTIGATIONS :
Analytical data
08-28-92.
RFA RECOT{TTENDAT TONS :
CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN:
ITTVESTIGATION PI.A!T8 :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
is available for a sampling event dated
Arsenic, cddmium, chromium, copp€trlead, mercury, nickel , zinc
This site will be investigated according to the SeptjcDrainfields Receiving Industrial WastewaterInvestiqation Plan.
O urrr nuIrBER: 633
t tIE ITOC.AAIODS U-43
Irf,IT DE8CRIPAIOtrs Septic Tank and Drainfield Svstem
This unit consists of a septic tank located 25 ft. westof the building and a drainfield located approxinately
20o ft. southwest of the building.
ueilAaED IA8![E8: Domestic wastewater and slight possibiJ.ity ofspilled material escaping through a floordrain.
AXIIUAIT VOITITUE DI8CEARGED: <100,000 gallons
OPBRIIIONIL DAAES: July 1969 - Present
PREVIOUS TXVESTIGilITOUS: Ton6
RFA RECOUIIEITDASIOIIS :
Initiate a sarnpling program to assure no hazardous
constituents are escaping proper disposaL.
coNSrrruEmS ot concERtr: N/A
IIVE8Af GAIIOf, PIrAltS :
There is no evidence to indicate that any industrial
flows have been discharged into the septic system.
NO PT'RTIIER A TION IS PI.A}INED
REFERENCB DOCI,!,TE![I8 S
Thiokol Corooration Ground Jtlater OualLty Protection
Report. Septenber 7997
O ullrr NUuBER: G38
IrNIf LOCATIONs t{-193 s
Irf,IA DESCRIPIION: Seotic Tank and Drainfield Svstem
fhis unit consists of a septic tank/drainfield system
which receives both domestic and industrial wastewaterflows. The industrial flow consists of building
washdown, casting pit washdown, BAC cooling, boiler
condensate, and once-through cooling.
l[AltAcED WAgTEg: Domestic and industrial l{astewater
eNtruAIr VOIJITUE DISCEARGED! (10r00O gallons
OPERITIONAL DA![88: Septenber 1987 - Present
PREVIOU8 IITVESTIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
08-28-92.
RFA RECOUUETTDATIONS:
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTITUENII8 OF CONCERII: Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead,mercury, nickel, volatile organics,
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene
IIIVESTIIGATIOIT PIIAITs I
This site will be investigated according to the SepticDrainfjelds Receiving Industrial WastewaterInvestioation Plan.
UNTT TI'UBER3 646
IrNIf LOCAIIONS M-71
IINII DB8CRXPIION: Septic Tank and Drainfield Svstem
This unit consists of a septic tank/drainfield system.fndustrial wastewater may have been allowed to enterthe septic system through floor drains and sinks.
IiAIIAGED ffiI8TES: Domestic and industrial Wastewater
A}INUAL VOLUT{E DISCHARGED :<73r000 gallons
OPERATTONAIJ DATES:December L959 - Present
PREVIOUS IITVESTIGATIONS 3
Analytical data is available for a sampling event dated
07-22-92.
RFA RECOIII,IEIIDATIONB :
Initiate a sampling program to assure no hazardousconstituents are escaping proper disposal.
CONSTTTUENTS OF CONCERN:
ITNTESTIGATTON PI,A![8 :
Beryllium, mercury, pH, volatile
orgfanics, L, A-Dichlorobenzene
This site will be investigated according to the SepticDrainfields Receivinq Industrial WastewaterInvestiqation Plan.
UMT NUMBER: 648
ilvrr IocATroN: T-1
tiMT DESCRIPTION: Old Photographic Processing Drainfield
This unit consists of a septic drainfield receiving sanitary waste and possibly a
small amount of photographic fixer solution historically.
MANAGED WASIES:
Wastes containing silver, cadmium, and possibly very small quantities of
chromium and lead.
OPERATIONAL DAIES: The potentid for photographic fixer discharge would have
occurred during the late 50's or early 60's when the building
processed photographic film.
O RFA RECOMMEI\DATIONS: This site was not identified as a SWMU until January
L993, which was after the RFI report was issued.
CONSTITUEIYTS OF CONCERN: Cadmium, silver, chromium and lead
INVFSTIGATION PII\TIS :
This site will be investigated according to the T-1 Plntogrryhic Processing
Drainfield Investigaion Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
03 March L993
o
o
o
F
z
UEIH
E
I,NItr N[,UBER3 L94
uNIf[ tJocAtrIolts yl-L47
IrNIf DESCRIPIION: Construction Debris Landfill
This unit lras used as a landfill site for constructiondebris such as wood, asphalt, concrete and metal. o1d
Minuteman canisters were also scrapped at this site.
OPERAUONAIT DATES: L967 - 1980's
}IAIIAGED TA8l[Egs
Wastes consisted of construction debris. No hazardous
wastes were known to have been deposited at this site.
RFA RECOUIIEIIDAIIONS: No further action at this tine
fIIVESTTGATION PIrAI{8: NO FURTHER ACTfON
A. F. Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
26 September 1991
UNIT NUMBERI 224
UNIT IJOCATION: M-336
UNIT DESCRIPTION: Sanitary Iindfill
The sanitary landfill enoompasses approximately 46 acres and is composed of
three primary areas: the historical Eenches, the current operating cells for
asbestos and non-hazardous solid waste, and the future trench expansion area.
Ttre quantity of waste disposed at this landfill is approximately 5,000 ton per
year. All wastes are compacted and covered daily with at least 6 inches of
native soil.
When a trench has reached capacity, it receives a minimum of two feet of
native material, is graded to prevent water run-on and nrn-off, and seeded with
grass as the final cover.
IVTANAGED WASTES:
The solid wastes currently undergoing disposal consist primarily of paper,
wood and nrbber scraps generated by manufacturing, office facilities and
minor amounts of refuse from the cafeterias. Ttre landfill area also receives
asbestos materials which are placed in separate trenches from the other solid
wastes.
OPERATIONAL DATES:
Operations at this site began in the mid 1970s to the present.
RFA RECOMMEI.{DAIIONS:
Establish recycling/reuse and waste minimization progmms for materials now
sent to the landfill.
Groundwater monitoring in and around the site and characterization of any site
oontamination.
INVESTIGATION PI,AIYS:
Ttriokol proposes to install 4 ground water monitoring wells in the vicinity of
the M-336 Sanitary kndfill in order to determine if a rclease to the
environment has occurred from this unit. Tlre insallation and sampling plan
for the ground water monitoring wells is described in the M-3i6 Sanitary
Ia ndfill Monitoring Well lwtalluion Plan.
REFER.ENICE DOCT]MENIS :
M-336 Sanitary landfrll Permit. Augrnt 1986
T'NI[ NI'UBER3 481
IrNIf L,OCAIIOI|. Yl-L7 4
IrNrf DE8CRfPUONs Buildincr Debris Disposal Area
IIIA}IAGED TAS8ES:
OPERATIONAIT DATESS
RfA nECOtdltEt[DA'fION8: No further action at this time.
rIwESIITGAIION Pr.ttt8:
NO FTIRTHER ACTION AT THTS TTIIIE.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
This unit is used as a disposal area for constructiondebris. The debris consists of asphalt, wood,concrete, metal and other construction waBte.
Construction debris materials eonsisting ofasphalt, tood, concrete and metal. No
hazardous wastes are deposited at this site.
The beginning operational date is unknown and the site
continues to receive construction wastes to date.
oFc
H
l,
Iw
Hzt,€H(nnitrtE2t<cr>IEF
tssr8
v,HEI
o ITNM NITUBER3 2O7, 2O9, 2L3, 2L4, 2L5, 2L6, 2l7arb,c, 2L8, 2L9,
22O, 22L, 222, 223, 334t 335arb,c, 554, 555
IIIIIT IJOCATION: !{-136, Ir[-185, yI-46
ITIIIE DEBCRIPTIONs Industrial waste pits and trenches
SVilIt[U# Description
207
209
2L3
2L4
2L5
2L6
2L7
2L8
HMX waste water disposal
trench
Landfill for open-burnedmaterial (metal etc. )from burn pits
Received asbestos
containing waste waters
Propellant contaminated
saw dust burned and thentrench filled withindustrial hraste
Epoxies, pollmers,
reacted isocyanates, andother industrial wastes
Propellant contaminated
saw dust burned and thentrench filled withindustrial waste
fndustrial nrasteincluding pollrutets repoxies, aluminum oxide,rubb€rr rags, clothes,
empty containersr reacted
isocyanates, etc.
Industrial wasteincluding polyntets,
epoxies, aluminum oxide,rubb€r, rags, clothes,
empty containetsr reacted
isocyanates, etc.
fndustrial wasteincluding pol)mrersr
epoxies, aluminum oxide,
rubberr rags, clothes,
empty containersr reacted
isocyanates, etc.
Operational
Dates
L973-75
Unknown
1985-88
19 6 2-84
Late L97 O'sto nid
1980rs
19 6 z-late
L97 0's
unknown tolate 1980's
Precise
dates
unknown,
between
1952?-1975?
Precise
dates
unknolrn,
between
19 6 2? -Lg7 5?
Comments
Pit filled and
graded
15rX 100rx 5,
deep
15rX 100rx 6t
deep
15rX 100rx 6,
deep
15rX 100rx 5t
deep
20tx 20tx 6,
deep
15rX 150rX 6t
deep
15 rX 75tX 6t
deep
2L9
220
22L
222
223
334
335a,
33sb,
335c
554
555
Industrial waste
including pol]mersr
epoxies, altrminum oxide,
rubbeEr rags, clothes,
empty containets, reacted
isocyanates, etc.
Industrial and sanitary
waste, periodically
burned
Industrial waste
Industrial and sanitary
waste, periodically
burned
Industrial waste
fndustrial waste
Industrial waste
Industrial waste
Precise
dates
unknotn,
between
1952?-1975?
19 52 -mid
L97 0's
L962-edr1y
Lg7 0, s
19 52 -mid
L97 0's
19 5 2-Iate
L97 0's
1988-
present
unknown
unknourn
20rx 20tx 6t
deep
Exact size andlocation oftrench unknohrn
100rx 100,
Exact size andlocation oftrench unknown
15rX 100rx 6t
deep
Each 40tX 100'X6' deep
Exact size
unknown
Exact size
unknown
OPERATTO}IAI,DATES: See above
TT.A}IEGED IIASTES: See above
RFA RECOU}TETTDATI ONS :
Soil and ground water sanpling. Lined impoundments forhiEher risk industrial waste. Soil and ground waterremediation if indicated by analysis.
IIwES'|[IcA'llf ON PLilI8 3
These industrial waste trenches are operated underconditions of a solid waste plan issued to Thiokol
Corporation by the Division of Environmental Health.
Iiltren the individual trenches reach capacity, the trenchis closed by covering with a minimum of 24 inches of
excavated silty clay material. The surface is gradedto control run-on/run-off and seeded to grass as a
control for erosion.
All of these industrial waste pits and trenches are
located within the Point-of-Compliance (POC) of the M-
135 Burning Grounds and Liguid Thermal Treatment Areas(LTTA). The Burning Grounds are an interim status open
burning/open detonation facility to be permitted under
RCRiA Subpart X and eguivalent Utah regulations. The
LTTAts are units presently undergoing closure andpostclosure activities under direction of the IIBSIIW.It tfre Poc, Thiokol has installed a seriei of ground
water monitoring wells to monitor hazardousconstituents in the saturated zone. (See M-135 Burnincr
Area Ground Water Monitoring Program First fnterim
&g!, subnitted to the IIBSIIW February 1988, FirstInterim Report Addendum, submitted May 1989, Secondfnterim Report, submitted May 1990, 1991 Interim
Renort, submitted April 1991, and other applicablesubmissions.) Ground water is uonitored quarterly, andcorrective action wiII be addressed under a Post
Closure Permit.
It is not possible to separate contamination from the
L,TTA's (the major and possibly only source of ground
water contamination) from other possible sources,including the industrial waste trenches and pits.
However, based upon past and present disposalpractices, Thiokol does not believe the industrial
waste trenches are a significant risk to human healthor the environment including soil and ground water.
Records of materials disposed of within the industrial
waste trenches are available between 1985 and the
present.
John Holladay
Environmental Engineer
2L August 1991
UNIT IYUMBER: zLz
LINIT LOCATION: M-186
UItl^IT DESCRIPTION: Industrial Waste Iandfill
This unit is an industrial waste landfill which was used to dispose of industrial
wastes classified as non-hazardous wastes. fire landfill is approximately 100'
x 50 ' x 8' deep. The landfill was built with a double clay/bentonite liner and
is equipped with a leak detection system.
OPERATIONAL DATES: 1982 - 1986
MANAGED WASIES:
Wastes disposed at this site are indusrial wastes such as: polymers, curing
agents, desiccant, empty containers, inert propellant, and various other wastes.
RFA RECOMMEIYDATIONS:
Soil and ground water sampling, with remediation as indicated by andysis.
CONSTITT]EI{TS OF CONCERN:Documented: Naphthalene and barium
Potential: Volatile organics, arsenic,
cadmium, chromium, lead,
mercur!, selenium and silver
IIWESTIGATION PLAIT[S :
This industrial waste landfill lies upgradient from the Point-of-Compliance
wells for the M-136 Burning Grounds. Thiokol monitors these wells under the
M-136 Buruing Ground Area Ground Wuer Monitoring Progran for
hazardous constituents in the saturated mne. Howwer,
it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, o distinguish any ground
water contamination, if any, contributed by this unit from that of the other
waste trenches and pits in the burning ground area.
Thiokol considers this industrial waste landfiU to pose a greater risk than the
other industrial trenches at the facility, based on the inventory of wastes
known to have been placed within the trenches.
This site will be investigated according to the M-186 Industrial Waste Landfill
Investigaion Plan, for the constituents of concern.
REFERENCE DOCT]MEDITS:
Thiokol Solid Waste Permit. 1988; Thiokol Facilities Engincering Drawing
Nos. GPl-Cr261. 262
T'NT[ NTruBER: 296
IINIT LOCAIION: West of M-46
IINII DEgeRIPffONs Industrial Waste Disposal Area
This area has been used as a disposal site forindustrial waste. The wastes include metal, broken
composite motor cases, discarded pieces of concrete,
and other nonhazardous wastes.
I{NIAGED TA8TES:Construction debris and inert rocket motor
components
OPERATfONAL DATEE:
Operation of this site began in the early 1980s and
continues on a linited scale.
RFA RECOI{IIEIIDATIONS: Sampling
IIIVESTfGATfON PL,AI{S :
A. Frank $lalker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
Bhe materials disposed at this site are solid wastes
which are considered too bulky for placement within theindustrial waste trenches at M-136 or the sanitarylandfill at M-335. The ability to safely andeffectively conpact and cover the waste is the criteria
used in deciding whether to dispose within theindustrial waste trenches, the sanitary landfill or atthis site.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PIJANNED FOR THE RFI.
o
U
lt'
d
zz
>*t
E'
(A
o
o
O
or{
H
w
I
5
UItl^IT IYUMBER: 195
UNIT IJOCATION: West of M-L74
UI\-IT DESCffi: Old Burning Grounds
This unit consisted of unlined 'v'-shaped trenches into which waste propellants were
placed and burned. Any residue from the initial burn was reburned. Burning at this
location was sporadic and only lasted a short time. The area has been graded and the
large motor casting buildings were constructed near the site.
MANAGED WASTES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
OPERATIONAL DATES: 1959 - 1961
RFARECOMATIONS:
Soil sampling in the immediate area.
CONSTIflIET.ITS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, mercury, H}vD( and
nitroglycerin
II\"VESTIGATION PLANS :
This site will be investigated according to the Old Burning Gromds West of
M-174 Investigation Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
07 May 1992
UIYIT IYt MBER t 202
IIMT I0CATION: Northeast of M-243
UNTI DESCRIPTION: Old Burning Grounds
This unit was operated for a short perid of time for the disposal of test and
off-specification propellants by open burning. The burning area is
approximately 25 ft,by 25 ft. It is estimated that only about 200 - 300 lbs of
waste were burned over the period of operation.
MANAGED IVASTES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
OPERATIONAL DAIES: 1962 - 1964
RFARECOMATIONS:
During the RFA, this site was identified as a possible landfill site. It has now
been confirmed ttrat it was used as a burning ground and will be investigated
as such.
CONSTITT]EIYTS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, mercury, beryllium,
HIIX, nitroglycerin, perchlorate, and nitrate
IIYVESTIGATION PLAIYS :
This site will be investigated according to the OA Burning Grounds Nonheast
of M-243 Investigation Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
L2 May 1992
LINIT IYUMBER: 233
III\IIT IJOCATION: East of M-303
LINIT DESCffi: Old Burning Grounds
This site was used to burn waste propellants and propellant contaminated
solvents and rags. These items were burned daily but toal quantities were
small. fire specific burning ground area has been graded and revegetated.
MANAGED IVASTES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
OPERATIONAL DATES: 1959 - L9&
RFARECOMATIONS:
Sampling
CONSTIfl]ET{TS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, mercury, HlvD( and
nitroglycerin
INVESTIGATION PLAIIIS :
This site will be investigated according to the Old Buming Grounds tust of M-
303 Iniestigaion Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
13 May 1992
UI{IT IYUMBER,z 243
UhIIT I0CATION: M-136
UIrIIT DESCRIPTION: Old Burning Grounds
This site was used as the burning grounds for waste propellants and propellant
contaminat€d wastes prior to the development of the cutrent burning grounds.
The specifrc burning ground area has been graded and revegetated.
MANAGED IVASIES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
OPERATIONAL DATES: Mid 1960s to Mid 1970s
RFA RECOWATIONS: Sampling
CONSTITT]EIYTS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, mercury, HlvD( and
nitroglycerin
IIIVF"STIGATION PLANS :
This site will be investigated according to the Old Buming Grounds a M-136
Invesdgaion Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
13 May 1992
gE
LH
8EH=
ah
or..c
H
(,
I&
T,NIT NI,UBERS 452
UNII L,OCAIIIONS It[-8
IrNI.|[ DEECRIPTIONs Dust and Grit Blast Collectors
These two coll,ectors collect particulate from theprocessing of fiber glass, kevlar, and graphite
components.
ltAltAcED fAgTES: Fiberglass, kevlar and graphite particu}ate
OPERAAIONAIT DAfEgs
The grit blast system has been operational since L987,the dust collector since prior to 1979.
RBA RECOl.tltEltDAffONg 3
. Recycle or reuse of uaterials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sanple materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
TNVEStrIGAIIIOT{ PI..AN8 3
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a Danner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FITRTHER ACTION fS PLAI.INED.
A. Frank $Ia1ker
Environmental Engineer
03 October 1991
I'NTT NT'UBER: 453
IrNfT IJOCAtrION: It[-4 3
T'NIT DESCRIPTION: Dust Collection-System
This system collects particulate
phenolics and asbestos.
consisting of rubberr
IiAIIAGED fAgTEgr Rubber, phenolic, and asbestos particulate
OPERAAIONAL DA![88: Installed in 1989
RFA RECOUI.TEITDAtrION8 3
. Recycle or reuse of naterials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are presento Proper disposal of wastes
fIIVEBEfGAIEION PITINS:
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I-!-335 Sanitary Landfill. The waste
collected within this particulate collection systen
contains asbestos and is handled and disposed in a
manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED.
A. Frank l{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
03 October 1991
I'NI8 NI'TTBERs 455
ITIIIT L,OCAtrfON: I.I-53
IrNItr DESCRIPUON3 Dust Collection Svstem
This system collects dust and particulate consisting ofsilica and graphite.
}iAIIAGED fAgIEg: Silica and graphite particulate
OPERAIIOIIAIT DATE8: Installed in 1952
RFA RECOU}TENDArIONS:
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
ITTVBSEIGAAION PI..ANS :
The waste materials are disposed wlthin the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The waste
collected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI.A}.INED.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
03 October 1991
I,NTT NT,UBER: 458
IINIT L,OCATION: ![-85
I'NII DESCRfPTION: Dust Collector
This collection system receives particulate from thecutting of silica, carbon, metal and rubber.
IIAIIAGED f,A8tr88: Silica, carbon, metal and rubber particulate
OPERI,EIONAL DA[88: 1988 - Present
RFA RECOUI.TEITDAEIONS 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeepingr Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
IIVE8IITGATION PLA![8 !
The waste naterials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I.I-335 Sanitary Landfill. The waste
collected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS PLAI.INED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
03 October 1991
T,NIT NT,UBER: 460
T'NIT LOCATION: I{-2LO
T,NIT DESCRIPTION: DUSt CoIIeCtOr
' This collection system receives partLculate frou theriffling, sampling and weighing of aumonium perchlorate
and HMK. The waste uaterial is taken to the YL-225
burning grounds for burning.
ITAIIAGED f,AgTE8: Ammonium perchlorate and IItdX particulate
OPERA$IONAIJ DATES 3 L987 - PTESENt
Rfe RECOUIIEIIDAiIIONE 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
IIIVESIIIGATION PLIITS:
The naterials collected in this system are handled and
disposed of according to approved methods for this typeof hazardous waste.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION TS PI,ANNED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
03 October 1991
I'NTT NTIUBER: 466
IrNfT LOCATION3 M-5
IINfT DE8CRfPTfONS Dust Collectors
This collection system receives particulate from theprocessing of carbon and silica cloth.
l{AtIAcED f,BgllE8: Carbon and sllica particulate
OPERETTONAE DATES:
Installation date of the older system is unknown. A newcollection system was added in 1991.
RTA RECOUITEITDATIONS s
. Recycle or reuse of materials. edditional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
IITVESAIGATION PI.AITS :
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FT'RTHER ACTTON TS PI,AI{NED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
03 October 1991
I,NIT NT,UBER: 468
UNII LOCAtrION: M-5
IINfT DESCRfPTION: Dust Collectors
This collection system receives particulate fromcutting, machining, and planning of wood..
titAlIAcED fAgfESs Wood Particulate
OPERAEIONEI, DAEES: L987 - PTESENt
RFA RECOI{UEITDATIONS :
Sample and monitor
IIwBSIIIGAIIION PLlttg 3
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the t{-336 Sanitary LandflLl. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO I"URTHER ACTION TS PLA}iTNED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
8 March 1991
T'NIT 47L
IrNfT IJOCATfON: Yl-52
t NrT DEgcRrPuoN: Grit Blast collection
Grit bLast from the cleaning of shuttle motor cases iscollected in drums and gondolas for disposal in thesanitary landfill. The grit blast is slmlted on a
semiannual basis and analyzed for hearry metals. This
sampling was started in 1986. The analytJ.cal data has
show no hazardous contaminate levels to be present.
}IA}IAGED WASTE8:Grit B1ast Particulate
OPERATIONAL, DATES: 1959 to Present
RFA RECOUUEIIDATIONs3
ITTVEStrIGAIION PI.AT{S :
NO ADDITIONAL ACTTON IS PI,AI{NED FOR THE RFI.
NEFERENCE DOCI'I!EN'!8 3
Il-52 Grit Blast Samolinq lrtalvsis
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
27 Septenber 1991
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sauple materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present
Proper disposal of wastes
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The waste
collected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a Danner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
The grit blast will be routinely sampled and monitored
as noted above.
IINIT NT'UBER: 474
IINIT L,OCATfON: M-66
T,NIT DESCRIPTION: Grit Blast Collection
Grit blast area for the cleaning of space shuttLe motorcases. The same components are cleaned each time. Thegrit is contained witfrin an area with a cbncrete floor.
}IAT{AGED WAgtrE8:Grit blast particulate
OPERAIIIONaE DAEE8S 1960 to Present
RFA RECOI{}TEITDATTONS 3
. Recycle or reuse of materialso Additional attention to housekeeping. Sanple materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
TilVESATGATION PLAITS:
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-335 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected sithin this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handLed and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
Samples of the spend grit were taken in August 1990 and
analyzed for hearryr metals. The analysis showed thematerial to be non-hazardous.
NO FTIRTHER ACTION
REFERENCE DOCI'ITE!Ttr8 S
l[-66 Grit Blast Sample 3;rtalysis
A. Frank l{alker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
TINIT NT'UBER: 476
IINIT ITOCATfON: M-113
IrNf[ DESCRfPTION: Grit Blast Collection
This collection system receives particulate from gritblasting operations.
IiAIIAGED rAgTES: Grit blast particulate
OPERAIIOIIAIT DATE8:. L977 to Present
RrA RECOUIiENDaIIONS 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
O rnvEsrrcA*-o* PT,ANB:
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection systen
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
T,NTT NTIUBER: 477
IINIT ITOCATION: M-113
IINIT DESCRIPTfON: Dust Collectors
This collection system receives particulate from tape
wrapping and machining of carbon and silica phenolic
cloth.
tdAlIAcED I9A8AES: Carbon and silica particulate
OPERATIONAI' DATE83 L977 tO PTESENt
RFA RECOU}TEIIDATIONS 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Samp1e materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
IITVEEIIIGAIION PI,AD{8 :
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I.I-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FTIRTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED.
A. Frank lfalker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
I'NIT NI'IIBER! 480
IrNIE ITOCATION. Yl-L74
I,IIIT DESCRIPIION: Dust Collectors
This collection system receives particulate from thegrinding of arnmonium perchlorate.
IIAIIAGED trAgTE8: Ammonium perchlorate particulate
OPEREEIOITAI, DAIES 2 L987 tO PTESENt
RFA BEEOUUEIIDATION8 S
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
O rrwEsrrcArroN PLAlrs:
The materials collected in this system are handled and
disposed of according to approved methods for this typeof hazardous waste.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED.
A. Frank l{alker
Environmental Engineer
OZ October 1991
I,NIT NT,I{BER: 499
IINIT ITOCATION: E-5L2
IrNIT DESCRfPTION: Grit B1ast Collection
Grit blast from the cleaning of plastic and netal partsis collected in drums for disposal in the landfill.
The grit blast is sampled on a semiannual'basis and
analyzed for hearry metals. The analytical data has
shown no hazardous contaminate levels to be present.
l.ttrlIAGED f,AgIEg: Grit blast particulate
OPERATIONAIJ DATES. L962 tO PTESENt
RFE BECOUITENDEEIONSS
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
ITIVESTIGAEIOIT PI.lANs :
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
The grit blast will continue to be routinely sanpled
and monitored as noted above.
NO ADDITTONAI, ACTION IS PI,AI{NED FOR THE RTT.
REFERENCE DOCI'IIEITtr8 t
E-572 Grit Blast Sanple lrtalvsis
A. Frank l{alker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
T,NIT NT,UBER: 501, 5O2
T,NItr IJOCAEION3 E-5L7
IrNfl[ DESCRIPEION: Dust Collection Svstems
The south systen collects dust and particulate from the
machining of carbon, silicon, fiberglass and aluminum.
The east system collects dust and particuiate fron the
nachining of carbon phenolic materials, steel and
aluminun.
!{AIIAGED fAgfBg: Carbon, silica, fiberglass and metal particulate
OPERAIfONAIr DATEE:
The south system hasyears, the system on
RFA RECOI{UEIIDA8IONS :
rTIVESTIGATTON PI,A![S :
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
OZ October 1991
been operational for 20 plus
the east end since L974.
a
a
a
Recycle or reuse of materialsAdditional attention to housekeeping
Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present
Proper disposal of wastes
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO F'I'RTHER ACTTON IS PI,AI{NED.
T,NItr NT,TTBER: 508
IrNfT ITOCAtrfON: !{-L7 9
T,NIT DESCRIPSION: Dust Collectors
This collection system receives particulate from the
machining of carbon, rubber, fiberglass, graphite and
kevLar conposite materials.
ITNIAGED fA8![88: Carbon, rubber, fiberglass, graphite andkevlar particulate
OPERAIfONIIT DA!IE8: 1988 to Present
RFE BECOUUEITDATIONS S
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additlonal attentLon to housekeeping. Sauple materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
INVESAIGAIION PI.}I{g :
The waste naterials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I.!-336 Sanitary Landfill. The waste
collected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creatLng nuisance dust.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED.
A. Frank lilalker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
I'NIT 509
IINIT ITOCATfON: !YI-L7 9
TINIT DESCRIPTION: Dust Collectors
This collection system receives particulate frou thegrit blasting of metal components.
TtrAIIAGED TTASTEE:Grit blast particulate
OPERABTONAIJ DATES! 1988 tO PTESENt
RFA RECOUUEIIDATTONS:
Recycle or reuse of materialsAdditional attention to housekeeping
Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present
Proper disposal of wastes
ITIVESTIGETION PL}TIS 3
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
o
o
o
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I.I-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED.
I'NIA NI'UBER: 518
IrNff LOCAIION! U-508
IrNII DEBCRIP|IIOII: South Dust Co].]ectors
This collection system receives particulate from the
uachining, grinding, and nilling of rubber insulationmaterial.
IIAIIAGED f,AgfE8: Rubber Particulate
OPERAAIOIIAL DATES: First operated in 1985, and nodified in 1987.
RFA RECOUUEIIDAEIONS 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sanple materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
IIMSIIGATIOII PIrlltB:
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I.I-336 Sanitary Landfill. The waste
collected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FT,RTHER ACTION IS PI,AIINED.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
I'NTT NTIUBER: 519
IrNfT LOCATION: M-508
IrNff DESCRfPTfON: East Dust Collectors
This collection systen receives particulate from the
machining, grinding, and nilling of rubber insulationmaterial.
ttAItAeED fAgTEg: Rubber Particulate
OPERAIIOIIAL DAIESs 1980's to Present
RTA RECOUUEITDAITONS 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Samp1e materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
IlwESl[IGelf ION PfrNtg s
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the It{-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate colLection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AITNED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
uAltecED fABTEgr Silica, carbon and graphite particulate
OPERATIONAIJ DATEE: 1989 tO PTESENt
RTA RECOU}TEIIDETIONE :
I,NTtr NT,UBER: 525
IINIE LOCATfON: !,f-585
I,NTT DESCRIPTION: DUSt COIIECtOrS
ITIVESTTGATTON PI,ANS :
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
This colLection system receives particulate fromcutting and grinding of silica, carbon, and graphite
materials.
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present
Proper disposal of wastes
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I,[-335 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but ls handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED.
IINItr NTIUBER: 537
t NIT IJOCATfONS YI-79
IrNff DE8CRIPIfON: Dust Collectors
This collection system receives particulate frou the
sanding of cured primer on motor components.
TTA}IAGED WAsTEs:Sanding particulate
OPERATfONAI' DATEE: 1989 to Present
NTA RECOIIUEDIDArIONS !
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
ItwEgtrfGAUON PfJAilg s
The waste uaterials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the M-336 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not eontain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION TS PI,AI{NED.
A. Frank l{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
OZ October 1991
IrltIT lnUBER3 538
IINIT I,OCATTONs M-103
UNII DEgcRfPuoNs Dust and Grit Blast Co]Iectors
This collection systeu receives particulate frou the
removal of charred rubber insulation from. post fired
motors.
IT,A}IAGED IIA8TES:Rubber particulate
OPERAIIIONAL DAfEg: Modified in 1988, but operational prior to
then.
RFI RECOUIiEIIDAIIIOII8 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
TITVESTIGAIIION PLAIIs :
The waste materials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I.l-336 Sanitary Landfill. The waste
eollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
NO FI'RTHER ACTTON IS PI,ANNED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
TINIT NT,TTBER: 542
T,NIT LOCATTON: M-508
IrNfT DEgCRfPtrfON: Dust Collectors
erit blast from the cleaning of strategic motor casesis collected in gondolas for disposal at the I.I-336landfiIl. The grit blast is sanpled on a seniannualbasis and analyzed for hearry metals. This sampling wasstarted in 1986. The analytical data has shown no
hazardous contaminate levels to be present.
ttANAcED fAgTES: Grit blasting particulate
OPERAAIONAIT DAAB83 1959-Present.
RFA RECOUI{EIIDATIOIT8 !
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sample materials to ensure no hazardous constituentsare present. Proper disposal of wastes
IITVESTIGAIION PI,[{8 3
The waste naterials are disposed within the asbestos
trenches at the I.I-335 Sanitary Landfill. The wastecollected within this particulate collection system
does not contain asbestos but is handled and disposedin a manner to avoid creating nuisance dust.
The grit blast will be routinely sampled and monitored
as noted above.
NO FT'RTHER ACTTON TS PI,ANNED FOR THE RFT.
Paul Hancocl<
Environmental Engineer1Feb. 1991
I,NIT NT,UBER: 545
IrNfT ITOCATION! l[-13
I,NTT DEECRTPTION: Dust CoITEctOrs
This collection system receives particulate from thegrinding of ammonium perchlorate. The waste materialis taken to the I.l-136 burning grounds for'disposal.
!{AIIAGED f,Ag,|!E8: Ammonium perchlorate particulate
OPEREEIONEIJ DATESS L982 tO PTESENt
RFA RECOI{UEITDAEIONS 3
. Recycle or reuse of materials. Additional attention to housekeeping. Sanple materials to ensure no hazardous constituents
are present. Proper disposal of wastes
IIwEStrIGATION PLAltg 3
The materials collected in this system are handled and
disposed of according to approved methods for this typeof hazardous waste.
NO FIIRTHER ACTION TS PI,ANNED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
02 October 1991
T
Hv,o€Erzl<HFH}vt2
EIocvt
oFd
H
(,
I&
TI}IIT TTI'UBER: L7 5
t NIT ITOCATIOX: tf-55
IrNIl[ DEgCRIP[fOts Vehicle ]laintenance Holdinq Tank
ThiE unit consists of a holding tank for collectl.ng
water, oil and grease. The wastes are picked up fromthe holding tanks and sent to building U-fAe forpreparation to be shipped offsite for recycle/reuse
and/or disposal.
l[trllAGED rAg|rESs
I{aste oil and other wastes incidental to the operationof a vehicle maintenance building.
OPERATIOITAL DA![88: August 1959 - Present
RFe RECOIIIIEIIDAIIOII8 s
Testing of sump contents for hazardous constituents andprocedures to assure no hazardouE vastes are introducedinto the tanks.
I!5VE8[TOArIO![ PLNtg 3
The waste oils are sampled for characterLzation priorto shipnent off site and are handled accordingly. Theoils are designated for reuse/recycle based on the
sanpling analysis. Periodic naintenance of company
vehicles generates the najority of the waste oil.
NO ADDITIONAIJ INVESTIGATION IS PI'AT{NED FOR THE RFI.
A. F. I{a1ker
Environmental Engineer
19 November 1991
UNIT I{UMBER z 192
UIriIT I0CATIONz M-227
IINIT DESCtsIPION: Hydrofluoric Acid Treatment Unit
Ttris unit consisted of a concrete trough lined with 'lime-rock" which carried the
spent hydrofluoric acid to an unlined neutralizationpond measuring approximately
15'x 15'x 5' dso containing "lime-rock'. After the initial neutralization process,
the liquid then flowed into a 100'x 100'x 4' pond lined with limestone and
bentonite where the neutralization process continued in conjunction with
evaporation.
OPERATIONAL DAIES: t963 - L967
PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS :
On 03 May 1983, a site inspection and assessment was conducted at this site by
Ecology and Environment, Inc. to satisfy requirements of the U. S. PA, RegionV[I. The results of this event are described in the report nld Prelimirwry
Assessmeru and Site Inspection of Thiokol.
MANAGED WASIES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of corrosivity (Ilydrofluoric AcO.
RFA RECOMMEI{DAIIONS:
Soil sampling near and beneath the ponds to determine if contamination has
occurred.
The entire unit should undergo closure.
CONSTITTIEIYTS OT CONCERN:
INVESTIGATION PLAI\S:
Cadmium, chromium, pH and lead
This site will be investigated according to the M-227 Hldrofluoric Acid Tfeannent
Unit Sutlpling Plan for the constituents of concern.
REFE,RENCE DOCTIMEITTTS :
Prelirnirury Assessment and Site Inspection of Thiolcol. Ecologt and Environnunt.
hrc.. Junc. 1983
A.F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
06 May 1992
ITf,Il' ITUTBERS 193
UUIA LOCIATOI. U-L74
IrNIE DE8CRIPIfOX! Old Hvdroqen Fluoride Evaporation Pond
This unit consisted of an unlined pond measuring
approxinately 10,x LO,x 4,. The pond was usied for thesporadic disposal of snall quantities of hydrofluoric
acid.
OPERalrIOltIL DllIEg z L962 L964
I,IAIIAGED IA8![E8:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of corrosivity(hydrofluoric acid)
RrA RECOUIIEITDATfONB : Soil Sampling
TTTVESTICATIOTT PLANS :
In 1983, a Field Investigation Team from Ecology and
Environment, Inc. conducted an aaaessment and siteinspection of this site to satisfy requirements for theU.S. Environnental Protection Agency, Region VIIf.
Based on the findings of this site investigation, theField Investigation Team concluded that rrbecause this
area has already been graded and built upon and no
problems were encountered during the constructionperiod, the FIT recommends that no further action be
undertaken at the site.rr
The Soils in the area are high carbonate calcarioussoils with high buffering capabilities. The spenthydrofluoric acid would tend to react with the soil to
produce non-hazardous, Iow solubLe products. The soils
would adsorb any metals carried by the acid.
fhiokol has installed a ground water monitoring well
desLgnated as B-3 approxinately 150 feet north west ofthis site. No anomalouE metals or pH values have been
recorded in this weIl.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED IN THE RFI.
REFERETTCE DOCUTTETTI8 s
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
06 May L992
Prelimlnarat Assessment and Site InsPpctlon of Thlokol.
EcoToey and Environment Inc. June. 7983
UNIr NIIIIBER: L97 , 198, L99 , 2Os
utIII I.r()CATIOI! l{-139, l{-L32, It[-57, M-224
UIIIII DEgCRfP[IOtt3 OId Hvdraziniun Diperchlorate Storaqe Areas
These units were used for storage of hydraziniundiperchlorate (HPz) r on ingredient in the production ofpropellant. The HP, was stored in small metalcanisters and buried flush with the ground surface.
The unstable nature of the naterial caused Thiokol to
abandon its use and the material and canisters were
removed from the sites.
OPBRI:tiIOltAIr DAIE8 3
Operation dates were from L962 L967 with the
exception of unit number 205 (M-224) which was operatedfrom L962 L972.
IiAITACBD TASTES8
AII material at this site was considered product.
RtrA RBCOIIIIENDATIOITS !
No further action at this tine.
rDIVEgTIGeffON PITAN8 3
NO FI'RTHER ACTION
RETERENCB DOCI'TIEITTS 3
Prellminary Assessment and Site Inspection of Thiokol
EeoToW and Environment Inc. . ilune 7983
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
26 September 1991
. fiI\"IT llt MBER. 200, 201
)
UItl.IT I0CATION: T-35
UNIT DESCRIPTION: Bervllium Test Area
This area was used to test beryllium propellants and for firing of small rocket
motors loaded with beryllium propellant. This unit includes the area where the
test firing of motors occuned and also a disposal area where beryllium
contaminated materials were disposed.
MANAGED WASIES:
The wastes likely to have been disposed at ttris site include the equipment used
in the test firings, motor cases, hand tools, clothing and other associated
wastes which may have been contaminated with beryllium.
OPERATIONAL DATES: 1962 - 1968
RFA RECOMMEI\DATIONS:
Soil sampling near and around the disposal and test site.
CONSTITT]EIYTS OT CONCERIY:Beryllium and volatile organics
II{VESTIGATION PLAhIS :
This site will be investigated according to the Berylliurn Test Area
Investigation Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engin@r
11 May 1992
U}r[T NUMBER,z 203
UNIT IOCATION: East of M-203
IJNIT DESCRIPTION: Old Dnrm Storage Area
firis site was used for the storage of dnrms conaining wastes conAminated
with beryllium. The dnrms werc stored at this site awaiting disposal by
burning. The dnrms were mixed with Minuteman propellant and open burned.
MANAGED WASIES:
The waste consisted of paper, rags and other materials which were
contaminated with beryllium.
OPERATIONAL DATES: 1963 - 1965 (estimated)
RFA RECOMMEDIDAIIONS:
Soil sampling
CONSTITT]EI\ITS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, metrcury, and beryllium
IIYVESTIGATION PLA}TS :
This site will be investigated according to the Old Drutn Storage Area fust ot
M-203'Invesrtguion Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
T,NIT TTU}IBER: 2O4
IINIT LOCATfOII: East of M-227
TINIT DE8CRIPTTOf,: CS DiSPOSAI SitE
rhis site was used as a disposal area for rinse water
from the cleaning of containerE wlth residual CS(Ortho-Chlorobenzylmalonitrite), a military riot agent.
ITAIIAGED IA8[883
No hazardous wastes
OPERATIOIIAI. DATES: L977
RFA RECOUUETIDArIONS:
No further action at this time.
IITVE8TfGAIION PITAIIB :
NO FT'RTHER ACTION
REFERETTCE DOCI'UETITS :
Preliminary Assessment and Site Investigation otThiokol Ecology and Environment. Inc. ilune 7983
A. F. Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
utrIr ilulBEnr 206
uillr LoclElor. M-223
IrUIE DE8CRIPUOUs OId Berylliun Propellant Storaqe Area
This site was used asr a storage area for berylliunpropellant during research and developnent prior to
open burning at M-225 burning grounds
OPERAEIOITAE DATE8. L962
ITAITAGED TA8TEE:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivi.ty.
R.FA RECOI{IIENDETTONs :
This unit was not addressed in the RFA Report.
IlgVEg![ICA![IOlt PIrAltB :
The area was burned and regraded at the end of theberyIliun propellant program.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED IN THE RFI.
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
UNIT NT MBER: 208
IJNIT I0CATION: M-136
UNIT DESCRIPUON: Old Waste Oil Disposd Pit
This site was used for the disposal of wastp oils. firc pit was burned
periodicatly.
MANAGED WASIES: Waste oils
OPERATIONAL DAIES: 1962 - 1970s
RFA RECOMMEDIDATIONS:
Ttris site was not specifically addressed in the RFA Re,port.
CONSTIfl]ENTS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, and lead
IIWESTIGATION PLAITIS :
This site will be investigated according to the Old Waste Oil Disposal Pit at
M-136 Invesrtgaion Plon for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
13 May 1992
UilIT !rUUBER,S 2LO
I,NIA ITOCAEIOX3 lrl-186
IrNIT DE8CRIPIION: North Industrial Waste Pond
This unit consists of a bentonite clay lined earthen
pond used for the separation of non-hazardous waste oil
and water. The oil is prinarily cooling oil used in
metal cutting. No naterial has been placed in the pond
since March 1990. The pond is no longer used for
disposal purposes.
OPBRATIONAL DA8E83 L982 - March 1990
ITENAGED f,AsTE8 3
Wastes consisted of non-hazardous oil and water.
RFA RECOUIITETTDATIONS : Sampl ing
IIwESTIGATION PLAtfB:
The pond was sampled in April
sampling verify that the oil,
DoD-hazardous. This data and
are found in a Thiokol report
Sampling and Analysis.
1990. The results of thewater and sludge werea report of the samplingtitled ltl-L86 Ponds
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,A}.INED FOR THE RFI .
REFFERENCE DOCM{ETTT8 :
I'I-786 Ponds Sampling and AnaTysis
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
24 January 1991
T,NIT NI,UBER: zLL
IINrI IJOCATION: I{-185
IrNIE DE8CRIPTIOII! South Indrrstrial Waste Pond
This unit consists of a bentonite clay lined earthen
pond used for the neutralization of acid wastewater anddisposal of other non-hazardous inorganic industrialwastewater. The pond is equipped with a leak detectionsystem. No material has been placed in the pond since
March 1990. The pond is no longer used for disposal
purposes.
OPERAIIONAIT DAAEST L982 - Mareh 1990
IIAIIIGED TASTES3
Iilastes consisted of noD-hazardous hrastewater.
RFA RECOUUEITDATIONE : Sampling
IilVESrIGATIOT PLAITS 3
The pond was sampled in April 1990. The results of the
sampling verify that the water and sludge were non-hazardous. This data and a report of the sampling are
found in a Thiokol report titled lt!-786 Ponds Sanpling
and Analysis.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PIJANNED FOR THE RFI.
REFERENCE DOCI,!iEN![8 !
I,I-786 Ponds Sampling and Analysis
PauI Hancock
Environmental Engineer
24 January 1991
UNII IIIIUBER: 225, 226
ITIIIT LOCAIfOXg West of M-46
IrNIS DE8CRfPIfON: Mine Tailinqs Area
This site lras reported to be a mine tailings area
associated with use of the property prior to purchase
by Thiokol Corporation.
OPEReIfOf,eIr DATB8: Unknown
IIAITAGED IIS![E8I
There are no known wastes at this site.
RrA RECOIIIIEIIDATTONS s
No further action at this time.
- rrvEgnroArrou pr.ar[s 3 No FTTRTHER AcrroNU
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
T,NIT }IIN,IBER: 23L, 232
T,NIT LOCATIO}I: M-115
fruItr DE8CRIPAION: Industrial Waste Ponds
These units received asbestos contaminated wastewaters
from the wash out of rocket motors. There were two
ponds measuring approximately 55'x 15'x 2.5' and 20tx5o'x 3'. The area has since been graded over.
OPERAIIONAIT DlfE8l 1981 - L987
IiAITAGED f,AsTEs 3
Wastewater containingrocket motors.
RFA RECOUUENDATIONS:
asbestos from the wash out of
No further action based on the risl< of
any site investigation or remediation.
exposure during
ITWESTIGATION PI,AT{8: NO FTTRTHER ACTION
A. F. Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
27 September 1991
T,NIT NI,T{BER: 236
IINIT ITOCAIIIOilI It[-34
Irf,Ir DEBCRIPUOIT Perchloric Acid Spill Site
In 1967, approxinately 4r000 gallons of perchloric acidspilled near !{-34. The acid uas neutralized with line
and the recovered liguid was placed into a Eump.
ITAI{AGED TAATESS
Oxidizing Agent
OPEREAIOUAIJ DAIIEg I 1957
RFA RECOIIIiEIIDATIONS 3
SoiI sanpling
I}IVEETIGATIOIT PITIITS :
Neutralization, time and weatherlng have reduced the
hazards associated with this site.
Because this is a site of an accLdental splll from aproduction area, it should not be characterized as aSolid Waste Management Unit.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED FOR THE RFI.
REFEREf,CE DOCI'IIEII!!8 :
Preliminary Assessment and Site InvestLgation ot
ThiokoT. EcoTogy and Environment- Ine. ilune 7983
A. F. Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
19 November 1991
UilI! ITUUEERs 237
IrNIf fr(TAAIOXs !{-80
IrNIf DESCRIPTIOf,S PCB Spill Site
Oil containing PCB leaked from a transforner ontoconcrete pad and into surrounding gravel.
ITAIIAGED TA8![88 S
No hazardous waste
OPERltrIOUAI, DATE8z L979
RFA RECOIiUETTDATIOITS :
This unit was not addressed in
fITVESTIGATION PIIANB :
the RFA Report.
The spill site was cleaned and the soil and gravel
surrounding the pad were sent off-site for disposal.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI-,AI[NED.
RETERENCE DOCI'IiEII![8:
PCB SpilT Cleanup Plan and Documentation. Seot. 7979
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
19 November 1991
UNIT NT'UBEN3 238
VNII rrOCArIOf,3 lt-52
UilII DE8CRIPTIOX3 Methv1 Chloroform Spill Site
Between 500 and 1000 gallons of LrLrl - trichlorethane(Methyl Chlorofom) escaped from a degreaser pit whenthe tank system failed. The solvent was released intothe soils beneath the tank.
I,TAIIAGED -rASTESS
The source of the released material was a'Iarge
degreaser sump. The sump was part of production
process and was not used to manage waste materials.
OPERATIONAL DA8E83 Incident occurred on November 8, L984.
RrA RECOUltEltDl![IOltg !
This site was not included in the RFA Report.
rlIVE8f IGATIOI{ PI,AITS :
Morton Thiokol personnel reported the spill and madeevery effort to ninimize the event.
Migration of the spilled solvent would be detected and
tracked by the ground water monitoring wells at theThiokol facility.
Because the spill was an accidental, one-time
occurrence from a production area, it should not be
considered as a Solid Waste Management Unit.
NO FIJRTHER ACTION IS PI.,AT{NED.
RETERENCE DOCI'ITEIITS :
ItI-52 ltlethvl ChToroforn Soi77 Rercrt 7984
A. F. $Ialker
Environmental Engineer
L9 November 1991
IrNIf MrUBERS3 239, 24O, 24L, 242, 3O7, 308, 347, 348, 450, 510
IrNIS LOCATIOXS: I't-635, It[-39, I{-114, ItI-508, VI-9, A-1 , A-2, yl-L97,
A-2, Ir[-186
UNII! DEgcRIPtfIOlt: Photographic Waste Accumulation Tanks
These units consist of 55 to 250 ga1lon fiberglass orplastic tanks to collect spent photographic
fixer/developer solutions to be recycled.
UANAGED rl8[Egs
These solutions generally contain silver, cadmium,
chromium and lead.
OPERAUONAIT DAfEg 3
Operational dates vary for each unit, but generally
span the tine beginning in July L982 - Present.
RFE RECOUIiEITDATIONS !
Berms or double containment for all tanks.
IIVESTIGATION PIrlItB :
These tanks are used for the accunulation ofrrrecyclable naterialsrr and are regrulated under 40 CFR
266 Subpart F and the equivalent Utah State
regulations. These regulations do not require
secondary containment for these materials. However,
many of these tanks are located within bermed areas
which would effectively contain released mat,erials in
the event of a spill.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI.AI.INED FOR THE RFI.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
L9 November 1991
T'NI[ NTIUBERI 295
IINII ITOCAIIOX: T-298
UUME8CBIPTIOI! Hvdrazine Dilution Area
This unit is a small treatment process to dilute waste
hydrazine in order to make it safe to transport off-plant to a hazardous waste disposal facility.
IIIITAGED TA8TE83
Hydrazine
OPERAIIOIIIL DAEES! 1987 - Present
RrA RECOIIIIEIIDAIIOIIS !
No further
IIIVE8TIGATIOIT PIIANB :
NO FT'RTHER
action at this time.
ACTION TS PI,AI.INED.
A. F. Ifla1lcer
Environmental Engineer
20 November 1991
T,NI[ NI,T{BER: 297
IrNfT f.OCATfOf,l U-43
ITIIIT DESCRIPTIOIS: Underqround Storase Pines
rhis unit consisted of 8 metal pipes used for storageof product propellant or propellant ingredients.
IIAIIACED Il88E8!
fhis unit was not used for waste management but forproduct storage.
oPERAIIOXTL DAIES: 1960rs - Itlid 1960rs
RFA RECOIIIIEIIDATIOf,s :
Not addressed in the RFA Report.
IIrVEETIGArIOT PLIITE 3
In 1978, personnel frou Morton Thiokol flashed each ofthe eight pipes with 1.3 propellant to ensure that nopropellant or propellant ingredients remained. Thepipes were then disposed of in the landflll on March3L, 1988.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED IN THE RFI.
A. F. Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
20 November 1991
IrNrr NIII{BER: 459, 47O
IrNIf LOCAIION: M-87, It{-33
IrNIS DESCRIP8IONs OiIy Discharges From Compressors and Vacuum
Punps
These sites are areas where small quantities oflubricating oil has been released to the soil duringon/off cycling of compressor and vacuum punps.
OPBRAEIONAIT DAfEgs
Exact dates of the installation unknown but the systems
are presumed to have been operational since constrrrctionof the buildings with modifications and replacement ofthe systems periodically.
IIAIIAGED IIASTESs
Nonhazardous/lubricating oil
RFI RECOUITENDArIONS 3
Install containment or filtration devices to control
dispersion of the oil discharge.
MVE8TIGAIION PIrAI{SI
The necessary control measures will be taken to contain
and/or eliminate any further discharge of the oils ontothe soil media.
No further action beyond implementing the reconmendations
above is planned for the RFI.
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
3 January l-99 L
T'NIT NTruBER: 45L
UNIT ITOCATfON: M-224
IINIT DE8CRIPTION: Shot Pond Se-ttlinqllank
This unit consists of a 500 gallon stainless steel tankresting on a bemed concrete floor. The tank isconstructed such that the entire bottom surface canvisually be inspected. The tank is used to separatenitroglycerin from the wastewater.
OPERATfONAIT DAIE8: L972 1,985
IIAIIAGED fAgllES: Nitroglycerin
RfA RECOUT{ENDATIONS3 Undergo a RCRA closure for the unit.
IIM8TIGAIION PLAN8 3
The unit will remain in place to act as a hazardous waste
sump and as secondary containment if there is anaccidental release of hazardous product within the Uj224facility.
NO TURTHER ACTTON IS PI-,ANNED IN THE RFI.
John C. Holladay
Environmental Engineer
L9 August 1,991
UilIT NI'UBER: 463
ut{rr roctrloxs It[-52
I,NIT DE8CnIPTIONs Paint Booth Oversprav Collection
This unit consisted of a collection system utilizing
water to trap paint overspray. Thiokol Corporation
considered the water in the collection system part of aprocess, and therefore not a waste until collected fordisposal. This system has since been removed from thebuilding and a new systen utilizlng different
technologry has been installed.
IiAIIAGED TA8TE83
The material consisted of paint particulate trapped in
water,
OPERATIONAL, DAIE8S
The beginning operational date is unknown and the booth
remodeled and the wet collection system removed in late
1990.
RFI RECOUIIEITDAIIONS 3
This site was visited but not addressed in the RFA
Report.
IIIVESEIGAIIION PI.ANS 3
NO FURTHER ACTION TS PI,ANNED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
L5 January L99l-
T,NIT NT,UBER: 464
IrNIT LOCATfON: E-5L7
T,NIT DESCRIPTION: Wet ScrubbEr
Wet Scrubber unit which
anodizing and rinse tanks.
is collected in a tank anda rlon-hazardous sump. The
wastewater treatment plant
T{,A}IAGED TASTE8:
collects fumes from above
The water from the scrubberneutralized, then flows intowater is then taken to thefor processing.
Non-hazardous neutralized industrial wastewater.
OPERATfONAL DATES: L982 - present
nfA ngCOllliENDATIONg3 Not addressed in the RFA.
IIN/ESTIGI'TION PI.IITS :
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
LL January 1-99 L
Routine sampling verifies the waste is nonhazardous.
NO FURTHER ACTION IS PI.ANNED.
T,NIT NT,UBER: 469
IINIT LOCAIIOII: It[-14
UNItr DESCRIPUON: FUEI Oil SPill SitE
This unit is the site of a 670 gallon fuel
which occurred on 26 June 1986. The cause
was an inattentive truck driver who allowedto overflow during transfer.
oil spillof the spillthe tanlcs
T{ATIAGED TA8TES: #S Fuel oil
OPERAIfONAIT DAIES: The spill occurred on 25 June 1985
RFA RECOUldEltDAIIOltg 3
Cleanup and disposal of wastes
III.8IIGAEION PIrAlSg!
thiokol made every effort to minimize the extent of thespill. The spill lras reported to the appropriate State
and Federal officials.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI.,AT{NED FOR THE RFI.
RETERENCE DOCI'ITEIITS :
14-74 OiI SpilT RePort
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
UNIT NI,ITBERS 481
UtI[ ITOCI|IIOI. }f-L7 4
IIIIIA DE8CBfPrIOtt3 Buildinc Debris Disposal Area
This unit is used as a disposal area for constructiondebris. The debris consists of asphalt, wood,
concrete, metal and other construction waste.
tllltAcED IAgEEgs Construction debris naterials consisting ofasphalt, wood, concrete and metal. No
hazardous wastes are deposited at thls site.
OPERArIOIAI. DA[88 3
The beginning operational date is unknown and the site
continues to receive construction wastes to date.
Rfe RECOtltlEf,DAIfOf,g: No further action at this time.
O rnvEsrrcArrot Prrarrs:
NO FT'RTHER ACTTON AT THTS TTUE.
A. Frank Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
T'IIIT }ITIITBER: 494
IrNfT LOCATIOII: T-18
IINIT DE8CRIPTION: Fluorescein Dye Test Site
The fluorescein dye was used in watertightness testing of
motor joints to certify that the deslgn prevents leakingat the joint. The water f,rom the tests was collected ina lined pond and transported to the wastewater treatmentfacility at lt-705 for treatment and discharge under a
TPDES pernit.
UAltAeED fAg![ES: Wastewater containing fluorescein dye
OPERAIIONAIT DAIES: Test was conducted in April 1990
RFA RECOUIIEf,DAIIIOITS :
Thie Eite was visited but not included in the RFI Report.
IIwESIICAIIOII PLAltg !
The wastewaters were discharged into a lined pond andthen transported to building I.I-705 for treatment anddischarge under a IIPDES permit.
NO r"TIRTHER ACTION IS PI,AI{NED
A. Frank lf,alker
Environmental Engineer
16 January 1991
I,NIE NII}IBERI 496
I,I{IT LOCIIfON. T-24
UIIIII DESCRIPEION3 fnactive Propellant Wash-out Tanks
This tank system received wastewater generated in the
wash-out of propellant. The tanks are constructed ofsteel reinforced concrete and are separated by bafflesinto four individual tanks with open tops.
OPERAIIONAIT Dl![Eg3
The system was installed in April L982 and abandoned by
May 1985.
IIAIIAGED TASTBS8
The wastes contained in this unLt are wastewater
sludges from the wash-out and processing ofpropellants.
RTA RECOI{IIENDAIION8 :
Rinse tanks thoroughly
Dispose of rinsate through M-705
Assure no propellant reuains
III.8TIGAEION PLAI{8 s
A work order will be initiated to have the
recommendations implemented.
NO FTRTHER ACTION IS WARRANTED when this is conplete.
D. L. Covington
Environmental Engineer
9 January 1991
I'NIT TTI,ITBER: 5OO
UilIf LOCISIOIT E-516
IIUIS DE8CRfPTfOI: Mobile Waste Oil Tank
TT,AIIAGED TA8![88:
OPERATTOTItrL DA8E8 I
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Eigineer
27 December 1990
ThiE nobile container is used to collect waste oLls froma vehicle maintenance building. I{hen this contaLner isfilIed, the oil is taken to a larger storage tank at M-185 where it is collected and sent off site forreuse/recycle or disposal.
Waste motor and hydraulic oil
Beginning operational date is unknown andcontinues to this date
Rra RECOuuEttDtrroxS 3
Initiate a periodic sarnpling progran to assure wastecontains no hazardous constituentE. Establleh andenforce a policy of waste ninimization, reuse andrecycling to reduce amounts of waste to be processed.
IITVESEIGITTOI PLllT83
The waste oils are sampled for characterization
shipment off site and are handled accordingly.are designated for reuse/recycle based on theanalysis. Periodic naintenance of company
generates the najority of the waste oil.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,A}INED
prior to
The oils
sampling
vehicles
UNIT TIUUBER: 511
IrI{fT L(}CATIOII I{-19 1
I'NItr DE8CRIPEIOX: l-tobile Hazardous Waste Container
This mobile container is used to
following its use in motor casting tofill void spaces.
collect wastewater
force propellant to
TIATIACED TA8TE8:Wastewater that may be contaminated withpropellant ingredients.
1986 - PresentOPERATfONAIT DI\TB8:
RFA RECOITTTETTDATIONS :
Provide a form of secondary containnent for the
containers while they are idle to reduce the adverEeeffects of an unplanned release.
ITVBSIICATIOIT PLilT8 3
rhis unit is constructed to allow visual lnspection of
the tank. Because of its nobile nature, any releaEe from
the tank would be readily noticed and correctlve action
taken.
The contents of this container are rernoved wlthin 90 days
and taken to building U-705 for treatnent and discharge
under a TPDES permit.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION TS PIJANNED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
27 December 1990
uxlr f,uuBEns 513
uxMocallorys u-193
UXII DE8CRfPIIOIs Moblle Hazardous Waste Container
T,IATIAGED TA8TE8:
ThiE mobile container is used to collect wastewaterfollowing its use in motor castLng to force propellant to
f111 void Epaces.
Wastewater that Day be contaminated withpropellant ingredients.
OPERATIOTTAIJ DATES:
RTA RECOUUENDArIONSS
Provide a
containerseffects of
IIUVESIIGAIIOil PIrlItB :
1986 - Present
form of secondary containment for thewhile they are idle to reduce the adverEe
an unplanned release.
ThiE unit is constructed to aIlow vLsual inspection of
the tank. Because of its noblle nature, any release fromthe tank would be readily noticed and correctl.ve action
taken.
The contents of this container are removed withln 90 days
and talcen to building U-705 for treatment and discharge
under a UPDES pernit.
NO FT RTHER ACTION IS PLAI,INED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
27 Decenber 1990
T,NI8 NT,UBER: 530
pNI[ LOCArIOil: I[-7O5
T,NIT DESCRIPTIONs TanK Rupture Area
This unit is the site of an above ground storage tankwhich ruptured spilllng an estinated 51000 gallons of
wastewater onto the soil.
OPERAtrIOIIAIT DAlfES: The tank ruptured on 24 August 1989.
UAilAGED f,A8TE83
The tank contained wastewater sludges from the
manufacturing and processing of propellants.
RFA RECOUITEITDATTONS s
Sampling
O rrlv,srrcArro* Pr,AltB:
Extensive sanpling and monitoring of the area occurredfollowing the spill. A soil vapor extraction system wasinstalled for remediation of the soil. The reEults ofthe investigation are found in the report titledInstaTTation and Operation of a PiTot Sol,7 VaporExtraction Systen Adiacent to Buildinq ttl-705. Thisreport concludes that there were no significant findings
from the sanpling, monitoring and renediation activities
conducted at the site.
NO FI,RTHER ACTTON IS WARRANTED.
RETERENCE DOCI'IIEIITS 3
fnstaTTatlon and operatLon ot a PLTot SoLI VaporExtraction System Adjacent to BuiTdinq lil-705
A. F. Wa1ker
Environmental Engineer
February 1991
UNIT NT,ITBER: 534
T'NI[ LOCETTON:
I'NIT DESCRIPUON:
This area
operation.
OPERATfONAIT DA[88:
TTAT{AGED TAsTEg:
RFA RECOTTITIETTDATTONE :
X-9 (West of !{-13 6 )
Shredded Paper Waste Site
was used as the site for a paper shredding
about 1980 through 1989
Office paper shredded for security purposes
Clean up and proper disposal or recycle of the waste inthe area
IITVESETGATTOX PLI}IS 3
The waste has been removed from the area and taken to thesanitary landfill at M-336 for disposal.
NO FT'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED IN THE RFT.
John C. Holladay
Environmental Engineer
19 August 1991
T'NIT TTUT{BER: 547
t NII ITOCAIfON: East of ![-311
IrtrIT DEgCRIPUof,s Excess Road Oil Disposal Area
This unit is the site of a disposal area for excess roadoil (tack oil). The oil rlas used in the road paving
process.
OPERATIONNT DAIES! The date of disposal is unknown.
t{ltAOED rAg![ES! Road Tack Oil
RFA RECOITIiEIIDAEIONS 3
Removal of waste and soil sampling to follow.
INVESAIGAIIIOIT PLAITS 3
SampJ.es of the tack oil were taken and submitted to thelaboratory for analysis using TCLP. The lab detectedXylene at a concentration of 0.19 ppn with no othervolatiles detected. Xylene is a natural occurringconstituent found in tack oil, tar and related petroleunproducts. The material is considered nonhazardous and
does not warrant removal at this time.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PI,ANNED FOR THE RFI.
REFEREITCE DOCI'ilEIT8 !
tI-79 Tack Oil Sample Analysis
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
26 November 1991
I'NIT ITI'UEERS 548
IrNIE f.OeeEIoNs T-1o3
IrNIE DE8CRIPTfON: OId Test Firinq Area for Minuteman ltotors
This unit was used as a testing area for Minutemanrocket motors.
IiANACED trAgTEg: This unit was not used for the management of
waste materials, but for test firing of
Minuteman rocket motors.
OPERAIIIONAIT DATE8S
Operational dates of this unit were the 1960E throughthe early 1970s.
RFA RECOUIIENDETIONS 3
Soil sanpling and proper disposal of any eontaminatedsoiIs.
IIwEStrIGAIIOII PITANB3
The area where the test firings rrere believed to havetaken place has been used as a gravel borrow source.
Gravel has been removed from this pit for several years
and there is no visual evidence of the location of thetest firing area.
Because this site was not used a managrement site for
waste material, NO FURTHER ACTION IS PIJAIiINED.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
UIIITT ITUIIEENT 549
uilrr Locrrlo[t I-19
UttII DEgcRIPIIott3 Buildinq Debris Disposal Area
ThiE unit is used as a disposal area for conEtructlondebrlE. The debriE consistE of asphalt, wood,
concrete, metal and other conEtruction waste.
t[AttACED IASSE8I Construction debris conEisting of asphalt,
wood, concrete and uetaL. No hazardous
wastes are deposited at this site.
OPERETIOITIL Dil[88!
The beginning operational date is unknown and the site
continues to receive construction wastes to date.
nrA RECOI|IIEIIDAIIOUS 3
CIay cap and close non-active landfills. Carefully
screen wastes to preclude any hazardous wasteconstituentE. Establish company wide recycling/reuseprograms. Ground water monitoring and remediatLon as
indicated by analysis.
rtwEgErcrrlox PLe[8 r
The materials disposed within this ravine are
construction debris and incidental wastes associatedwith construction and building demolition.
ThlokolrE nanual titLed Disoosal Instntctions tor Waste
ilaterLals gives procedures for segregatLng waste
naterLals and locations for disposal for waEte.
NO FT'RTIIER AqTION IS PI,AI{NED AT TIIIS rI!{8.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
UIYIT NUMBER: 551
UNIT IOCATION: M-187
IJNIT DESCRIPTION: Old Drum Storage Area
Ttris site was used as storage for empty dnrms awaiting to be returned to
vendors, and non-returnable dnrms to be sold to dnrm recyclers.
MANAGED WASIES:
This site was not intended to manage any waste materials, but only to store
empty drums. The empty drums may have contained some residual product
material.
OPE,RATIONAL DATES:
The beginning operational date for this site is not known; however, it is
estimated to have been approximately 10 to 15 years prior O when the empty
dnrm storage yard was moved to M-136 which occurred in 1986.
RFA RECOMMET{DAIIONS:
This site wiur not included in the RFA Rqrcrt.
CONSTITT]EIYTS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, metrcury, and perchlorate
INVESTIGATION PT,AI\IS:
Surface erridence at this site indicates that materials have been released onto
the soil surface and requires further investigation.
This site will be investigated according to the Old, Dnnn Storage Area u M-
187 Investiguion Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
14 May 1992
I'TIE ITUIIBEBI 556
INfE f.OCf,rIOtI3 U-136
UNII DEgeBIPTIOtts Old Licruid Thetmal Treatment Area
It ls believed that there rrere possibly two figuidlfhernal Treatment Areas which received wastewaters
generated in the manufacturing of propellant. Theseplts were abandoned shortly after construction due toplacenent too close to utility poles.
. IIAIIAGED TA8TE83
WaEtewater sludges from the manufacturing andprocessing of explosives.
OPERAAIOXAIJ DATES:
Precise dates are unknown, but it is believed that they
became operational in about L962 and were abandonedshortly thereafter.
RFA RECOtlllE[DArIOf,8 s
Undergo an approved RCRA Closure.
I}IVESAIGAIIOX PI.Af,8 :
These ponds have been out of service for nearly 30yearE. The area has been regraded and possibly usedfor other activitieE associated with the operation ofthe burning ground.
Any contamination from theEe ponds would be detected inthe current monitoring programs at the M-136 Burning
Groundsl however, it would be inpossible to distinguish
any contamination, if any, contributed by thls source
from that of the other units.
NO N)DITIONAL ACTION IS PI,AIINED FOR THE RFI.
A. Frank lilalker
Environmental Engineer
11 November 1991
I,NIT NT,TTBER: 607
ITIIIT L'OCITIOf,: l{-55
UUrI DE8CBIPAfOXs Removed Vehicle Maintenance Holdinq Tank
This unLt consisted of a holding tank for waste motoroil fron a vehicle maintenance facility. The wastes
were picked up from the holding tank and sent tobuildlng U-186 for storage while awaiting to be shippedoffslte for recycle/reuse and/or disposal.
UAITEGED TA8TE8:
WaEte oil and other wasteE incidental to the operatlonof a vehicle maintenance building.
OPERAAIOXI& DAIES: August 1959 - May 1991
RFA RECOIIIIEIIDAATONS 3
Testing of sump contents for hazardouE constituentE andprocedures to assure no hazardous waEtes are introducedinto the tanks.
IilVESTIOETIOX PIrN[83
The waste oil tank was removed from service on 9 May
1991 under the UST Program. A Stipulation and Consent
Agreement between Thiokol and The Bureau of Solid and
Hazardous Waste is currently pending. A draft of theStipulation and Consent Agreement was sent to Thlokolfor comnent. Thiokol is awaiting issuance of the final
agree.ment. Further investigations and/or correctiveaction will be handled under the Stipulation and
Consent Agreement.
NO ADDITIONAL TN\/ESTIGATTON IS PI.ANNED FOR THE RFI.
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
19 November 1991
T,NIT }IIII{BERI 615
IrNIT LOCA[fOf,s U-137A
IrNII DE8CRfPTIONS Removed Underground Waste Oil Storaae Tank
This unit consisted of a ten thousand gallon holdingtank for waste automotive and hydraulic oil fron avehicle maintenance facility. The f111 pipe leading tothe tank had leaked materials into the surroundingsoils. The tank was removed on 27 February 1982.
ItAl{AcED fAgTESs Waste automotive and hydraulic oil
OPERATfONNT DA![Egs Beginning operational date unknown
February 1987
PREVTOUS TNVESTIGAEIONS 3
The waste oil tank was removed from service on 27
February L987. Grab samples from the stained soLl wereobtained and sent for analysis at the tine of removal.
The results of the analytical work are found in aletter submitted to the Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste
Conmittee and included with thiE report.
RTA RECOUI{ENDATIONS:
This site was not addressed in the RFA Report.
CONSTII'UEUtr8 OF COltCERltl Volatile organics, cadnium, chromium and
lead
IIIVE8IIGNEIOT PT.AN8 !
This site wilL be investigated according to the trt-:!!!Z[
Removed Waste Oil Storacre Tank Investication Plan.
REFERENCE DOCI'UEil!I8 3
Snill Report - Morton Thiokol Wasatch Operations
Removal of an Underground l{aste OiI Storage Tank, 9
March 1987
IINIT NIIIIBERT 637
IrNIT LOCATIoII: P1ant, III
IrNIT DESCRIPTIONc Wast,e Disposal Area Of Former Thiokol Property
Owner
This unit is the location of a waste disposal area usedby t,he former ourner of the Thiokol property. There is
no visible evidence of Thiokol wastes having been
disposed at this site.
IIANACED IIASITES: Wast,es incidental t,o a farming\ranching
operation
OPERATIONAL DATES: Beginning operat,ional dat,e unknown
Present
PREIIIOUS IMTESTIGATXONS: None
RFA RECOIIIIEI{DATIONS :
This sit,e was not, addressed in E,he RFA Report.
CONSTITT,BTTS OF CONCERN: UnKNown
IMIESTIGATTON PITANS:
Thiokol will perform an assessment of Ehe dispoeal area
E,o det,ermine if hazardous const,ituent,s are likeIy t,o be
presenE from t,he variety of waste materials disposedthere. Thiokol is negot,iating wit,h the former owrler
regarding responsibility for t,he sit,e and anycorrective action reguired.
NO FI'RTHER ACTION IS PLANNED FOR THE RFI.
A. F. Walker
Environmental Engineer
20 ,JuIy L992
uhllT NUMBERI 647
UtluT LOCATION: M.136
IJNIT DESCRIPTION: Bnidine Contaminated Soil
This unit is operated for short term holding of pyridine contaminated soils
excavated following an incident. The soils were placed on a plastic liner
will clean soil forming a berm to prevent run-on/run-off. The soils are
currently being shipped off-site for disposal. Following complete removal
of all contaminated soil, this site will no longer function as a waste
management unit.
I\{ANAGED IVASTES: $rridine contaminated soil
OPERATIONAL DATES: Incident occurred in May 1992 and final removal of soil is
expected in April 1993
RFA RECOMMENDATIONS:
This site was not a solid waste management unit at the time the RFA was
conducted. The State of Utah, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste was
notified of this site as a SWMU on 6 January 1993.
CONSTITT]ENTS OF CONCERN:
IhIVESTIGATION PI,AITIS :
Bddine
All contaminated soil is currently being shipped off-site for disposal. The
soil was placed on a polyethylene liner following excavation.
NO FURTI{ER ACTION IS PI-A}.INED FOR THE RE[.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engineer
07 April L993
IIMT IYUMBER.z &9
IJIYIT I0CATION: M-585
UIIIT DESCRIPTION: Strurd Burner Exhaust Discharge Area
This unit consists of a 8 to 10 inch diameter vertical pipe buried to some depth
into the soil. When the building conducts a test burn of a small sample of
propellant, the exhaust is discharged into this tube. It is not known if the
tubes are capped at the bottom or if the soil acts as the cap.
MANAGED WASIES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactivity.
OPERATIONAL DATES: 1988 - Present
RFARECOWATIONS:
This site had not been identified as a solid waste management unit at the time
of the RFA.
CONSTITT]ENTS OT CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, mercury, HIVD(, and
nitroglycerin
II\TVESTIGATION PLAT{S :
Ttris site will be investigated according to the Strand Bunur &lnwt
Discharse Areas Investipaion Plan for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engin@r
8 March 1993
UNIT NUMBER: 650
UNIT ITOCATION: M-19A
uMT DESCRIPTION: Strand Burner Exhaust Discharge Area
This unit consists of a 8 to 10 inch diameter vertical pijC UurieA to some depth
into the soil. When the building conducts a test burn of a small sample of
propellant, the exhaust is discharged into this tube. It is not known if the
tubes are capped at the bottom or if the soil acts as the cap.
MANAGED WASIES:
Wastes exhibiting the characteristic of reactiviry.
OPERATIONAL DAIES: 1988 - Present
RFARECOWATIONS:
This site had not been identified as a solid waste management unit at the time
of the RFA.
CONSTIfl]ENTS OF CONCERN:
Volatile organics, cadmium, chromium, lead, silver, mercury, HIVD(, and
nitroglycerin
II\'VESTIGATION PII\IIS :
This site will be investigated according to the Stand Burner hhawt
Discharge Areas Inveyigaion Plon for the constituents of concern.
A. Frank Walker
Environmental Engin@r
8 March 1993