HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2024-008604195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144840 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4840
Telephone (801) 536-4100 • Fax (801) 359-8853 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4284
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah
SPENCER J. COX
Governor
DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
Brent H. Everett
Director
ERRC-093-24
June 27, 2024
Ryan Dunham
Site Assessment Manager
U.S. EPA, Region 8 (8EPR-B)
1595 Wynkoop Street
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129
Dear Mr. Dunham:
Enclosed for your review is an Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan for the Maple Street
Plume (SEMS EPA ID UTN000820949) (herein referred to as “Site”) located in Midvale, Salt Lake
County, Utah.
This investigation was initiated because a chlorinated solvent, tetrachloroethene (PCE), was
detected during routine water quality monitoring of a municipal well in 2010. A 2020 Site
Investigation detected PCE, trichloroethene (TCE), and benzene in soil gas samples exceeding at
least one U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benchmark at several former dry cleaner
locations in the area. A following 2022 Expanded Site Investigation (ESI) detected PCE and TCE
at levels exceeding at least one EPA benchmark at only one of the dry cleaners. Though it
successfully narrowed the search area, the ESI was unable to assess the extent of the plume and the
risk subsurface vapor intrusion poses to nearby residents.
The Division of Environmental Response and Remediation recommends collecting
additional soil and soil gas samples to fill in data gaps and develop strategies to safeguard human
health and environment.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (385) 391-8147, or via email at
etagliaferri@utah.gov.
Sincerely,
Edoardo Tagliaferri, Site Assessment Project Manager
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Page 2
ET/tt
Enclosure: Maple Street Plume ESI 2 Work Plan
cc: Dorothy Adams, Executive Director, Salt Lake County Health Department
Ron Lund, Environmental Health Director, Salt Lake County Health Department
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION WORK PLAN
Maple Street Plume
Salt Lake County, Utah
UTN000820949
May 2024
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION WORK PLAN
Maple Street Plume
Salt Lake County, Utah
UTN000820949
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Prepared by: Edoardo Tagliaferri
Approved: _______________________________________ Date: _________
Edoardo Tagliaferri, Project Manager
Approved: _______________________________________ Date: _________
Thomas Daniels, Site Assessment Section Manager
Approved: _______________________________________ Date: _________
Ryan Dunham, Site Assessment Manager, EPA Region 8
Expanded Site Inspection Work Plan 1
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 OBJECTIVES 1
3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2
3.1 Site Location and Description 2
3.2 Site History 2
3.3 Previous Investigations 2
3.4 Physical Conditions 3
3.4.1 Hydrogeology 3
3.4.2 Hydrology 4
3.4.3 Geology 5
3.4.4 Meteorology 5
4.0 PRELIMINARY PATHWAY ANALYSIS 5
4.1 Waste/Source Characteristics 5
4.2 Groundwater Pathway Analysis 6
4.3 Soil and Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Pathway Analysis 6
4.3.1 Data Gaps 7
4.4 Surface Water Pathway Analysis 7
4.5 Air Pathway 7
5.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 7
5.1 Concept of Operations 7
5.1.1 Schedule of Work 8
5.1.2 Safety 8
5.1.3 Site Access and Logistics 8
5.2 Sampling Locations 8
5.2.1 Subsurface Soil, Groundwater, Soil Gas, and Indoor Air Samples 9
5.3 Sampling Methods 9
5.3.1 Soil Gas Sampling 9
5.3.2 Subsurface Soil Sampling 9
5.4 Investigation Derived Waste 10
5.5 Analytical Parameters 10
6.0 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES 10
7.0 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY 10
Expanded Site Inspection Work Plan 2
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
8.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING 10
9.0 REFERENCES 11
Expanded Site Inspection Work Plan 3
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location
Figure 2 2020 SI Sample Locations and Selected Results
Figure 3 Previous ESI 2023 Sample Locations and Selected Results
Figure 4 Proposed Sampling Locations
Figure 5 Proposed Sampling Locations.
LIST OF TABLES:
Table 1 Data Quality Objectives
Table 2 Sample Locations, Descriptions, and Rationale
Table 3 Sample Analysis Checklist
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Site Health and Safety Plan
Appendix B Consent for Access to Property
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Under the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
of 1986, and in accordance with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) Division of
Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has prepared this Site Inspection Work Plan
(Work Plan) as part of the Expanded Site Inspection (ESI) of the Maple Street Plume,
UTN000820949, (referred to as the “Site”) in Midvale, Salt Lake County, Utah. This ESI will be
conducted under a cooperative agreement between the DERR and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8.
This investigation was initiated because a chlorinated solvent, tetrachloroethene (PCE), was
detected during routine water quality monitoring of a municipal well in 2010. A 2020 Site
Investigation (SI) detected PCE, trichloroethene (TCE), and benzene in soil gas samples at
concentrations exceeding at least one EPA benchmark (Frier 2020). A following 2022 Expanded
Site Investigation (ESI) used soil and soil gas sampling; at the former Fashion Cleaners property
(now Quik Pik Market, and henceforth referred to as such) soil gas sampling detected levels of
PCE and TCE well above residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs); other than at
that location, chlorinated solvents were either not detected, or were detected below relevant
VISLs. Additional sampling was recommended to determine the extent of chlorinated solvent
contamination in the subsurface and assess the risk of subsurface vapor intrusion to a nearby
residential area.
This ESI Work Plan 2 describes sampling procedures that will be used to delineate the plume
from the suspected contaminant source area and assess potential impacts on the surrounding
community
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The findings outlined in the subsequent report will provide information to help support decisions
regarding the need for further action at the Site. The specific objectives of this ESI 2 are to:
Delineate the plume from the suspected contaminant source area:
Collect additional Site information, including sampling data necessary to fill observed
data gaps;
Identify levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soils and soil gas at residences
and businesses near the potential source area;
Identify potential targets that may be affected by Site contamination or by the migration
of contaminants via the suspected exposure pathways;
Determine if continued assessment work under CERCLA or other authority is warranted.
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
2
3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Information pertaining to the history and current status of the Site was obtained from the
Preliminary Assessment Worksheet (Taylor 2019a), the Site Investigation Work Plan (Taylor
2019b), the Site Investigation Analytical Results Report for the Maple Street Plume (Frier 2020),
and the Expanded Site Investigation Analytical Results Report for the Maple Street Plume
(Sandlin 2023).
3.1 Site Location and Description
The Maple Street Plume Site is located in Midvale, Salt Lake County, Utah (Figure 1). The
municipal well where contaminants were first identified is located at 7610 South Maple Street,
immediately east of a Utah Transit Authority Rail Line and south of a residential cul-de-sac at
the end of Blisswood Drive. Access to the municipal well site is provided along an abandoned
roadway (Park Street) where it intersects Maple Street directly south of a churchyard. The two
wells at that location are referred to as the Park Street (Cold) Well and Park Street (Warm) Well.
The surrounding area contains mixed residential and commercial real estate, including five
historical laundry or dry cleaning facilities (Figure 2). Such facilities are significant because they
regularly utilize chlorinated solvents, making them potential sources of contaminants.
3.2 Site History
Contamination was first recognized at the Site in 2010 when routine groundwater sampling from
the Park Street (Cold) Well identified PCE at a concentration of 1.7 µg/L. PCE was not detected
in groundwater samples collected from the Park Street (Warm) Well. In 2013, both wells were
abandoned due to average uranium concentrations [43 µg/L] exceeding the drinking water
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 30 µg/L (Utah Division of Drinking Water 2021; Hoyle
2018). The uranium is unrelated to the Site and the PCE observed warranted further
investigation.
PCE is not naturally occurring and is most often introduced to the environment through its use as
a solvent in i cleaning. Water quality testing continued to
identify trace amounts of PCE until the well was abandoned in 2013, but at concentrations below
the MCL of 5 µg/L for PCE. These limited data are the only direct record of groundwater
contamination at the Site. Further groundwater testing of these wells is no longer possible as they
are no longer in operation (Utah Division of Drinking Water 2021).
3.3 Previous Investigations
A Preliminary Assessment (PA) completed in January 2019 identified two laundry and/or dry
cleaning facilities as potential contaminant sources that may have used chlorinated solvents
during daily operations (Taylor 2019a):
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
3
Day-Nite Laundercenter may have operated at what is now 7669 South Maple Street (Salt
Lake County Auditor 1998). White Raven Tattoo now operates at this location.
Fashion Cleaners (now Quik Pik market) began operations in 2009 at 118 West Center
Street and was active until at least January 2023; Quik Pik Market now operates at the
location as a convenience store.
A Site Investigation (SI) completed in May 2020 identified two additional dry cleaning facilities
as potential contaminant sources (Figure 2) (Frier 2020):
Matt’s Cleaners operated at 7565 South State Street in the 1960s. Just A Car Lot, a used
car sales business, now operates at this location.
Norge Dry Cleaning Village operated at 7615 South State Street during the 1960s. J and J
Tires now operates at this location.
An Expanded Site Investigation (ESI) completed in January 2023 identified the Quik Pik Market
location as the only potential contaminant source after sampling it and the three other potential
sources in the area (Figure 3) (Sandlin 2023).
Groundwater was not sampled during the ESI because the direct push technology (DPT) probe
did not reach groundwater within 20 feet of the ground surface. A natural aquiclude in the form
of a thick clay formation was observed to be present above the aquifer in the Site area. In order
to prevent potential contamination mobilization between aquifers, the DPT probe was not
advanced further than the thick clay formation at each sample location. The risk of exposure to
contaminants via the groundwater pathway is low because there are no active, downgradient
municipal drinking wells within four miles of the site.
Soil gas sample analysis showed that PCE and TCE are present at the Quik Pik Market location
at concentrations above background and relevant EPA benchmarks (Figure 3). These
contaminants were not detected at Just a Car Lot (formerly Matt’s Cleaners), J and J Tire
(formerly Norge Laundry), nor the former Harv’s Cleaners; these locations are not part of this
Work Plan.
The ESI recommended additional soil gas and indoor air sampling to accurately assess the risk of
exposure to subsurface vapors at residences and businesses proximal to the Quik Pik Market
location (Sandlin 2023).
3.4 Physical Conditions
3.4.1 Hydrogeology
The Park Street wells and the rest of the Site are located among alluvial basin sediments of the
Salt Lake Valley, which consist of unconsolidated to semi-consolidated deposits of Tertiary to
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
4
Quaternary age (Thiros 2010). The groundwater system in these valley deposits includes both a
shallow and deep aquifer, separated by discontinuous layers of fine-grained sediments. The
deeper aquifer is generally unconfined in proximity to the mountains and becomes confined by
these fine-grained deposits closer to the valley center.
Groundwater generally moves laterally from the unconfined portion of the deep aquifer near the
mountains to the confined zone near the valley center, where the Jordan River is located.
Groundwater also moves from the overlying shallow aquifer to the deeper basin-fill aquifer in
areas where the hydraulic gradient is downward and the confining layers are discontinuous or
absent. Towards the center of the valley, there is often an upward hydraulic gradient that moves
water from the deeper aquifer to the shallower one. The boundary between these dynamics and
the distinction between the two aquifers is unclear or understood only in general terms in many
parts of the valley.
The Park Street (Cold) Well was drilled in 1961 for Midvale City Public Utilities. It is a 16-inch
diameter well that produced a flow of 6.67 cubic feet per second (cfs) before it was sealed in
2013. The well is 475 feet
feet bgs—meaning that the well drew a portion of its water from the shallowest aquifer (Utah
Division of Drinking Water 2021).
The Park Street (Warm) Well is immediately adjacent to the Park Street (Cold) Well and also has
a diameter of 16 inches. It was drilled in 1966 and, before being sealed in 2013, produced a flow
of 0.61 cfs. This well was drilled to a depth of 782 feet and only produced water from depths
below the confining layer (Hoyle 2018; Utah Division of Drinking Water 2021).
Existing well data
2018; Utah Division of Drinking Water 2021; Magna Water District 2013). A natural aquiclude
in the form of a thick clay formation was observed to be present above the aquifer in the Site
area (Sandlin 2023). Soil borings advanced during the ESI did not encounter groundwater at 20
feet. Likewise, soil borings advanced during the SI did not encounter groundwater at 25 feet bgs
(Frier 2020). Groundwater is presumed to follow local topography, flowing to the northwest
across the Site toward the Jordan River.
3.4.2 Hydrology
The Site lies in the relatively flat valley bottom of the Salt Lake Valley at an elevation of
approximately 4,380 feet (Davis 2000). The Jordan River and its tributaries form the main
drainage for the valley and discharges into the Great Salt Lake to the north. The Site is located
within relative proximity of the Jordan River, but it is not located in any recognized flood-prone
area. Surface water at the Site is routed by storm drains 1.5 miles westward toward the river,
which then flows 24 miles to the north and drains into the Great Salt Lake.
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
5
3.4.3 Geology
The Site is located west of the Wasatch Range near the center of the Salt Lake Valley and
overlies various Quaternary lacustrine deposits, including Bonneville Lake Cycle Deposits of the
late Pleistocene (Davis 2000). At the Site, these deposits include calcareous laminated silts,
pebbles, cobbles, and minor lenses of sands and gravels. The thickness of this unit is quite
-Lake Bonneville
deposits of clays, silts, sands, and gravels of mixed fluvial and lacustrine origin. These older
e underlain by various Tertiary age
sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Salt Lake Formation.
3.4.4 Meteorology
The Salt Lake Valley experiences meteorological phenomena heavily controlled by its
physiographic position—surrounded almost entirely by mountains. It has a semi-arid
environment with summer temperatures above 100 ºF and limited precipitation. July average
maximum and minimum temperatures near the Site are 92.8 ºF and 58.5 ºF. January average
maximum and minimum temperatures near the Site are 38.3 ºF and 17.3 ºF. The valley receives
approximately 14.73 inches of average annual precipitation (Western Regional Climate Center
n.d.). The region is known for poor air quality, especially in winter, because stagnant aerosol-
laden air tends to rest over the valley.
4.0 PRELIMINARY PATHWAY ANALYSIS
4.1 Waste/Source Characteristics
VOCs, including PCE, TCE, and benzene are the primary contaminants of concern at the Site.
PCE and TCE were measured above Regional Screening Level (RSL) & Vapor Intrusion
Screening Level (VISL) benchmarks in soil gas samples collected downgradient of the Quik Pik
Market location [PCE = 5400 µg/m3; TCE = 53 µg/m3] during the 2023 ESI. All other
laundry/dry cleaning facilities have been sampled and returned results well below RSLs for PCE
and TCE.
TCE is a partial degradation product of PCE that is produced as PCE biodegrades in the
subsurface under anaerobic conditions (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2006; Watts 2006).
Physiologically, both chemicals are nervous system depressants and known carcinogens. These
chlorinated solvents are highly volatile, producing hazardous vapors that can migrate upwards
from groundwater and soil into houses and businesses. The inhalation of vaporous PCE and/or
TCE can result in dizziness, nausea, unconsciousness, and death. Prolonged exposure to these
chemicals can have severe effects on the nervous system, kidney function, organ development,
and the reproductive system (Centers for Disease Control 2021a; 2021b).
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
6
PCE and TCE are denser and less viscous than water (Schwille 1988), allowing them to sink in
groundwater and flow through rock or sediments that would normally impede fluid flow. As
such, these chemicals can cross aquifer boundaries and contaminate groundwater across
confining aquifer layers. Furthermore, their insolubility in water makes PCE and TCE very
difficult to remove from the groundwater system (Pankow and Cherry 1996).
Benzene was detected at low levels [2 µg/m3 to 11 µg/m3] in soil gas from all sample locations,
including background, below the Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL)
benchmark [12.0 µg/m3]. Benzene is a natural part of crude oil, gasoline, cigarette smoke, and
car exhaust and is widely used to make plastics, resins, nylon, lubricants, rubbers, dyes, and
detergents (Centers for Disease Control 2018). Inhalation of benzene vapors can result in
dizziness, drowsiness, a decrease in red blood cells, damage to the immune system, and death at
high doses.
4.2 Groundwater Pathway Analysis
The deeper aquifer is the primary water supply for the Salt Lake metropolitan area (Hely et al.
1971); however, it has not been accessed at the Site since 2013 when the Park Street wells were
permanently sealed (Hoyle 2018). Fifty-six wells owned and operated by eight public entities are
located within four miles of the Site. There are no active downgradient wells within four miles.
The nearest active well, oblique to the groundwater gradient, is the Murray City 7th West #7
Well, located approximately two miles northwest of the Site and with an intake depth of 370 feet
bgs (Figure 1). No chlorinated solvents have been detected in that well. There are 5,087 Points of
Diversion (PODs) within a four-mile radius of the Site (Utah Division of Water Rights 2020);
however, it is doubtful that the PODs are currently used for drinking water, as municipal water is
readily available. For these reasons, exposure to contaminants directly through the groundwater
pathway is unlikely. The primary concern is that contaminants in shallow groundwater may
volatilize and expose targets via subsurface vapor intrusion. No groundwater samples are
included in this Work Plan.
4.3 Soil and Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Pathway Analysis
The municipal well where PCE was first identified is located within a few yards of residential
areas (Figure 2), including backyards and family gathering spaces. Approximately 14,354 people
live within one mile of the Site (U.S. Census Bureau 2010). It is possible that contaminants could
be present within on-site soils at hazardous levels, especially near suspected source areas;
however, chlorinated solvents were not detected in soils during the ESI, except at the sample
location downgradient of the Quik Pik Market location, [PCE 15 µg/kg] well below RSLs
[24,000 µg/kg]. It is likely that potential areas of concern are beneath pavement or asphalt, which
would partition contaminants away from potential exposure to humans. The potential for
exposure through soil ingestions or direct dermal contact is presumed to be low.
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
7
Soil gas samples collected during the ESI indicate that PCE, TCE, and benzene are present at the
Quik Pik Market location above SCDM benchmark values. The Station at Midvale Apartments is
immediately downgradient of Quik Pik Market and the sample point there, with approximately
30 homes further downgradient of the Apartments. Additional near-slab soil gas sampling is
needed at homes and businesses located near the potential source area, Quik Pik Market, in order
to assess the risk of subsurface vapor intrusion.
4.3.1 Data Gaps
The risk of vapor intrusion into homes and businesses proximal to the site remains unknown.
Further soil and soil gas sampling are needed to determine potential source areas and the risk of
subsurface vapor intrusion at nearby residences and workplaces.
4.4 Surface Water Pathway Analysis
Surface water runoff flows into nearby storm drains at the Site. Drainage flows west 1.5 miles to
the Jordan River, which discharges to the Great Salt Lake 24 miles to the north. The potential for
exposure via the surface water pathway is minimal. No surface water samples were collected
during the ESI, and no surface water samples are included in this Work Plan.
4.5 Air Pathway
Volatile compounds, including chlorinated solvents, have the potential to volatilize and
adversely affect human health. Residences are located near the Site, including eight homes
within 800 feet of the Park Street well, and a large apartment complex adjacent to Quik Pik
Market (Figure 2). Approximately 413,049 people live within four miles of the Site (U.S. Census
Bureau 2010). The soil gas concentrations detected from ESI samples are insufficient to affect
people through general air exposure, except through intrusion directly into the confined space of
buildings (section 4.3). No obvious airborne release of on-site waste is known to exist and
outdoor air samples were not collected as part of the ESI because exposure through the air
pathway is unlikely. No outdoor air samples are included in this Work Plan.
5.0 FIELD PROCEDURES
5.1 Concept of Operations
Site sampling activities will comply with the Data Quality Objectives (Table 1) as described in
the DERR Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) (Palmer et al. 2020) and environmental
sampling collection procedures as outlined in the EPA’s Contract Laboratory Program
Guidance for Field Samplers (U.S. EPA 2014). A Conceptual Site Model (Figure 4) has been
completed to evaluate the potential pathways for contaminant migrations and to assist in the
selection of appropriate sampling locations. The scope of the investigation includes the
advancement of nine direct-push borings at eight locations for the collection of nine soil gas
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
8
samples and nine subsurface soil samples—including field duplicates for each matrix, and a soil
sample volume for MS/MSD. Any changes to proposed locations (due to access issues, etc.) will
be documented in the field notes and noted in the analytical results report. Opportunity samples
may be taken if warranted.
5.1.1 Schedule of Work
Sampling is tentatively scheduled to begin in Spring of 2024 and is expected to take four days to
complete. The scheduling of sampling activities will be finalized upon EPA’s approval of this
Work Plan. Initial reconnaissance of the Site will be conducted prior to the first day of the
sampling event during which alternate sample locations will be determined, if necessary, and
opportunity sample locations will be identified. A 21-day turnaround for the sample analyses will
be requested for the EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analytical services.
5.1.2 Safety
Sampling personnel will be careful to avoid direct contact, dermal contact, inhalation, or
ingestion of on-site materials. Proper safety protection will be worn at all times during sampling.
Sampling will be conducted in Level D protective clothing. A photoionization detector (PID)
will be used to scan soil at each of the borings, and additional safety procedures will be taken if
levels exceed outdoor ambient safety levels.
A Site Health and Safety Plan (HASP) has been prepared by the Project Manager and will be
reviewed by all team members prior to going on-site. The HASP form is included in Appendix
A. All on-site personnel will meet the Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA)
training requirements and be qualified to work at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
5.1.3 Site Access and Logistics
Site access and logistical functions will be arranged by the Project Manager in advance of
sampling. Provisions for Site access will be arranged and the landowners will be asked to sign a
DERR Consent for Access to Property form (Appendix B). Landowners will be notified of their
right to obtain split-samples if requested. Coordination with the EPA contract laboratory and the
local health department will be arranged prior to Site activities. The Project Manager or EPA
Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) contractors will arrange
sampling equipment and supplies.
5.2 Sampling Locations
A biased sampling approach using analytical data from previous reports was used to identify
sample locations for this ESI Work Plan, which are shown in Figure 5. A description of the
planned sampling activity for the Site is included in the Tables section of this Work Plan. The
following is a summary of the information presented in these tables:
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
9
Table 1 lists data quality objectives
Table 2 lists sample locations, descriptions, and rationale
Table 3 is a sample analysis checklist that indicates the laboratory parameters for the
analyses of each sample
5.2.1 Subsurface Soil and Soil Gas Samples
Soil gas and subsurface soil will be collected from borings at 12 locations at the Site (Figure 5;
Table 2). Ten of these locations are situated down-gradient from Quik Pik Market. Of those ten,
one is in the parking lot directly north of Quik Pik Market; four are in the street directly adjacent
to Quik Pik Market; two are west in the Station at Midvale parking lot area, and the remaining
three are the next block west on a residential street. One of these locations is directly south of
Quik Pik Market parking area. Background soil gas and subsurface soil samples will be collected
from a boring located upgradient of potential source areas to establish ambient soil gas and soil
conditions and to evaluate potential observed releases for the Site. One sample for each matrix
will be collected as field duplicates, and a soil sample volume will be collected for MS/MSD
purposes.
5.3 Sampling Methods
5.3.1 Soil Gas Sampling
Prior to advancing soil borings, Blue Stakes of Utah will be called to locate subsurface utility
lines. Soil gas and soil samples will be collected from the same boring; refer to 5.3.2 for more
specifics on the method for boring. The direct push rig or a hand auger will advance to
approximately five feet bgs at a predetermined location. Following extraction, the Polyethylene
or Tygon tubing will be placed down the boring and connected to an evacuated and metered
canister. The hole will be sealed at the surface with wet bentonite or other inert material, and the
sampling system will be purged of at least three sample chain volumes. Once purged, the canister
will collect soil gas for one hour. The valve on the sample canister will then be closed and
labeled appropriately. Soil gas samples will be analyzed for VOCs in accordance with EPA
Method TO-15.
5.3.2 Subsurface Soil Sampling
Soil samples will be collected by inserting an acetate sleeve into the hollow rod of the direct-
push unit and extracting a soil core from each boring. The cores will be visually inspected for
staining or discoloration, monitored for odors, and field screened using a photoionization
detector (PID) calibrated to the isobutylene standard in order to detect VOCs. Samples will be
taken from locations on the core with the highest readings—or from deepest part of the core if
the PID does not have a positive reading—and transferred to 8 oz glass vials sealed with a
polypropylene or phenolic open-top screw cap and a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) septum.
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
10
The vials will then be labeled for identification and stored in an iced cooler. Soil samples will be
analyzed for VOCs in accordance with EPA Method 8260B. Following all sampling, soil borings
will be backfilled with soil cuttings and asphalt will be patched at the surface.
5.4 Investigation Derived Waste
The generation of investigation-derived waste is not anticipated. Disposable sampling equipment
will be double-bagged and disposed of as non-hazardous. Excess sample material will be
returned to the sample location or disposed of according to accepted protocol. All hazardous
materials generated, if any, will be disposed of in accordance with applicable federal, state, and
local requirements, and in accordance with the U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response’s Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes During Site Inspection (U.S. EPA
1991) guidelines.
5.5 Analytical Parameters
Chain-of-Custody forms will be developed using SCRIBE software. Samples will be shipped as
environmental samples via strict chain-of-custody to a contract laboratory registered under the
EPA’s Certified Laboratory Program and analyzed under Routine Analytical Services for the
target compound list constituents and media as listed in the Sample Analysis Checklist (Table 3).
6.0 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
QA/QC samples will be collected from the Site as a check of proper sample collection, field
decontamination procedures, and laboratory procedures. Samples will be handled and preserved
as outlined in the QAPP (Palmer et al. 2020). Every effort will be made to ship samples to the
laboratory the day after the field sampling activity. Samples collected from the Site for QA/QC
purposes include field duplicates from each matrix and additional soil sample volumes for
laboratory matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD).
7.0 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
Samples will be handled and delivered to the CLP laboratory in accordance with chain-of-
custody protocols within appropriate holding times, as defined by the QAPP (Palmer et al. 2020).
8.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING
The data package delivered from the CLP laboratory will be validated by an EPA contractor.
Following receipt of the validated analytical data, the project manager will prepare the Expanded
Site Inspection 2 - Analytical Results Report (ESI 2-ARR). The analytical data in the validation
package will be compared to the appropriate benchmark values in the Superfund Chemical Data
Matrix, and background, or ambient, conditions. The project manager will prepare an assessment
of whether the Site should be recommended for further action through CERCLA or alternate
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
11
authority. All data and observations collected as part of this ESI 2 will be included in the draft
ESI 2-ARR and submitted to the EPA Region 8 for review and approval.
9.0 REFERENCES
Center for Disease Control. 2018. “Facts About Benzene.” April 4, 2018.
https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/benzene/basics/facts.asp.
———. 2021a. “Toxic Substances Portal- Tetrachloroethylene (PERC).” Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry. 2021. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/index.aspx.
———. 2021b. “Toxic Substances Portal- Trichloroethylene (TCE).” Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry. 2021. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/index.aspx.
Comer, Eldon. 1961. “Well Driller’s Report Well 57-3165.” Lehi, Utah.
Davis, F.D. 2000. “Geologic Map of the Midvale Quadrangle, Salt Lake County, Utah.” Utah
Geological Survey Map 177. Utah Department of Natural Resources.
Frier, W.P. 2020. “Site Investigation Analytical Results Report - Maple Street Plume.” Utah
DERR.
Hely, A.G., R.W. Mower, C.A. Harr, and T. Arnow. 1971. “Water Resources of Salt Lake
County, Utah.” Utah DNR Technical Publication 31.
Hoyle, A.R. 2018. Interview with Alan Ryan Hoyle, Midvale City Water Master.
Magna Water District. 2013. “Well Driller’s Report, Water Right 59-1295.” Magna, Utah.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 2006. “Guidelines: Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated
Solvents in Ground Water,” 51.
Palmer, Elizabeth, Muhammad Slam, Kim Viehweg, and Joseph Katz. 2020. “Quality Assurance
Program Plan for Environmental Data Operations for the CERCLA Branch, Final Plan -
Revision No. 8.” Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation.
Pankow, J.F., and J.A. Cherry. 1996. Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLs in
Groundwater. Portland, Oregon: Waterloo Press.
Peterson Bros. Drilling Company. 1974. “Well Drillers Report for Well 57-7999.” Well Driller’s
Report. Midvale, Utah.
Salt Lake County Auditor. 1998. “1998 Midvale City Address Change.”
Sandlin, W.R. 2022. “Expanded Site Inspection Work Plan - Maple Street Plume.” Utah DERR.
Sandlin, W.R. 2023. “Expanded Site Inspection Analytical Results Report - Maple Street
Plume.” Utah DERR.
Expanded Site Inspection 2 Work Plan
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949
12
Schwille, Friedrich. 1988. Dense Chlorinated Solvents in Porous and Fractured Media: Model
Experiments. Chelsea, Michigan: Lewis Publishers.
Taylor, Neil B. 2019a. “Preliminary Assessment Worksheet - Maple Street Plume.” Utah DERR.
———. 2019b. “Site Investigation Work Plan - Maple Street Plume.” Utah DERR.
Thiros, Susan A. 2010. “Conceptual Understanding of Groundwater Quality of the Basin-Fill
Aquifer in Salt Lake Valley, Utah.” Professional Paper 1781. U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. “2010 U.S. Census Bureau Data.” Utah Automated Geographic
Reference Center.
U.S. EPA. 1991. “Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes During Site Inspection.”
———. 2014. “Sampler’s Guide- Contract Laboratory Program Guidance for Field Samplers.”
Washington, D.C.: Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, U.S.
EPA.
Utah DEQ/DERR. 2016. “Draft Indoor Air Sample Protocol with Indoor Air Sample Information
Collection Form.”
Utah Division of Drinking Water. 2021. “Public Drinking Water Source Database.” Salt Lake
City, UT: Utah Division of Drinking Water.
Utah Division of Water Rights. 2020. “Water Rights Points of Diversion Database, Utah State
Geographic Information Database Layer Name:Wrpad.Shp.”
Watts, Peter. 2006. Tetrachloroethene. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document
68. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Western Regional Climate Center. n.d. “MIDVALE, UTAH - Climate Summary.” Accessed
December 19, 2014. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgibin/ cliMAIN.pl?ut5610.
FIGURES
TABLES
Ta
b
l
e
1
.
D
a
t
a
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
St
e
p
1
:
Pr
o
b
l
e
m
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
St
e
p
2
:
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
De
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
St
e
p
3
:
De
c
i
s
i
o
n
I
n
p
u
t
s
St
e
p
4
:
St
u
d
y
B
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
St
e
p
5
:
De
c
i
s
i
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
St
e
p
6
:
To
l
e
r
a
n
c
e
L
i
m
i
t
s
o
n
Er
r
o
r
s
St
e
p
7
:
Op
t
i
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
a
m
p
l
e
De
s
i
g
n
Ch
l
o
r
i
n
a
t
e
d
s
o
l
v
e
n
t
co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
or
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Mi
d
v
a
l
e
C
i
t
y
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Pa
r
k
S
t
r
e
e
t
(
C
o
l
d
)
W
e
l
l
,
wh
i
c
h
i
s
n
o
w
c
l
o
s
e
d
.
Se
v
e
r
a
l
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
l
a
u
n
d
r
o
m
a
t
s
ex
i
s
t
u
p
g
r
a
d
i
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
C
o
l
d
We
l
l
.
V
i
a
t
h
e
M
a
y
2
0
2
2
Ex
p
a
n
d
e
d
S
i
t
e
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
(E
S
I
)
,
a
l
l
t
h
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
la
u
n
d
r
o
m
a
t
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
el
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
s
u
s
p
i
c
i
o
n
as
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
o
f
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
ex
c
e
p
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
f
o
r
m
e
r
Fa
s
h
i
o
n
C
l
e
a
n
e
r
s
(
n
o
w
Q
u
i
k
Pi
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
)
.
Du
e
t
o
P
C
E
a
n
d
T
C
E
v
a
l
u
e
s
fr
o
m
s
o
i
l
g
a
s
s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
do
w
n
g
r
a
d
i
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
a
n
d
o
n
-
si
t
e
o
f
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
ex
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
V
a
p
o
r
I
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
Sc
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
L
e
v
e
l
s
(
V
I
S
L
’
s
)
an
d
/
o
r
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
Le
v
e
l
s
(
R
S
L
’
s
)
,
h
o
m
e
s
,
ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
e
s
,
a
n
d
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
ma
y
b
e
a
t
r
i
s
k
o
f
s
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
va
p
o
r
i
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
an
d
m
e
t
h
o
d
o
f
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
re
m
a
i
n
s
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
.
Is
t
h
e
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
n
g
t
o
co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
h
e
Si
t
e
?
Do
e
s
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
p
l
u
m
e
pr
e
s
e
n
t
a
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
ri
s
k
t
o
h
u
m
a
n
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
t
ne
a
r
b
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
v
a
p
o
r
in
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
?
I
f
s
o
,
w
h
a
t
i
s
th
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
l
u
m
e
an
d
e
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
im
p
a
c
t
?
Th
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
ar
r
i
v
e
a
t
a
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
:
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
o
i
l
g
a
s
an
d
s
o
i
l
s
a
m
p
l
e
s
do
w
n
g
r
a
d
i
e
n
t
o
f
Q
u
i
k
Pi
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
a
r
o
u
n
d
ne
a
r
b
y
h
o
m
e
s
a
n
d
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
,
a
n
d
i
n
ba
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
up
g
r
a
d
i
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
Q
u
i
k
Pi
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
.
Vo
l
a
t
i
l
e
O
r
g
a
n
i
c
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
d
a
t
a
t
o
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
an
d
r
i
s
k
t
o
t
a
r
g
e
t
s
.
Co
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
o
f
d
a
t
a
t
o
SC
D
M
a
n
d
V
I
S
L
be
n
c
h
m
a
r
k
s
t
o
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
wo
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
C
E
R
C
L
A
is
w
a
r
r
a
n
t
e
d
.
Hu
m
a
n
h
e
a
l
t
h
i
s
t
h
e
pr
i
m
a
r
y
t
a
r
g
e
t
o
f
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
a
t
t
h
e
S
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
Qu
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
r
e
a
t
e
d
as
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
o
u
r
c
e
o
f
co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
d
u
r
i
n
g
th
i
s
E
S
I
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
an
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
do
w
n
g
r
a
d
i
e
n
t
a
n
d
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
r
e
a
wi
l
l
b
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
e
d
t
o
as
s
e
s
s
t
h
e
r
i
s
k
t
o
hu
m
a
n
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
If
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
s
a
r
e
de
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
s
o
i
l
g
a
s
or
s
o
i
l
a
t
co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
b
o
v
e
SC
D
M
a
n
d
/
o
r
V
I
S
L
co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
t
h
e
n
fu
r
t
h
e
r
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
th
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
u
l
d
be
w
a
r
r
a
n
t
e
d
.
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
w
i
l
l
b
e
co
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
to
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
o
u
t
l
i
n
e
d
i
n
th
e
D
E
R
R
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
As
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Pl
a
n
f
o
r
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Da
t
a
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
Q
A
P
P
)
of
2
0
2
0
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
re
l
e
v
a
n
t
E
P
A
g
u
i
d
a
n
c
e
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
.
A
l
l
a
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
da
t
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
,
Ve
r
i
f
i
e
d
,
a
n
d
v
a
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
l
y
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
da
t
a
a
r
e
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
in
t
e
n
d
e
d
u
s
e
.
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
du
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
E
S
I
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
th
e
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
1
3
s
o
i
l
ga
s
s
a
m
p
l
e
s
a
n
d
1
3
s
o
i
l
sa
m
p
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
1
2
d
i
r
e
c
t
pu
s
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
f
i
e
l
d
d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
fo
r
e
a
c
h
m
a
t
r
i
x
a
n
d
a
n
MS
/
M
S
D
s
a
m
p
l
e
v
o
l
u
m
e
fo
r
s
o
i
l
.
S
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
ta
r
g
e
t
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
h
e
i
g
h
t
e
n
e
d
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
v
a
p
o
r
i
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
in
t
o
h
o
m
e
s
,
a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
co
m
p
l
e
x
e
s
,
a
n
d
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
d
o
w
n
g
r
a
d
i
e
n
t
of
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
.
Ta
b
l
e
2
.
S
a
m
p
l
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
R
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
e
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
M
a
t
r
i
x
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
e
MS
P
-01
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
7
6
1
1
S
G
r
a
n
t
S
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-01
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
wa
y
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
7
6
1
1
S
G
r
a
n
t
S
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
L
a
b
M
S
/
M
S
D
.
MS
P
-02
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
7
6
6
7
S
G
r
a
n
t
S
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-02
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
7
6
6
7
S
G
r
a
n
t
S
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-03
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
7
7
0
3
S
G
r
a
n
t
S
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-
0
3
-
S
O
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
7
7
0
3
S
G
r
a
n
t
S
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-04
-SG
So
i
l
Ga
s
In
t
h
e
g
r
a
s
s
a
r
e
a
N
E
o
f
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-04
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
g
r
a
s
s
a
r
e
a
N
E
o
f
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-05
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
g
r
a
s
s
a
r
e
a
W
o
f
r
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
i
n
mi
d
d
l
e
o
f
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-
0
5
-
S
O
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
g
r
a
s
s
a
r
e
a
W
o
f
r
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
i
n
m
i
d
d
l
e
o
f
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-06
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
N
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
f
St
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-06
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
N
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
f
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-07
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
E
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
f
St
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-07
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
E
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
f
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-08
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
E
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
m
i
d
d
l
e
g
a
p
a
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
Mi
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-08
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
E
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
m
i
d
d
l
e
g
a
p
a
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-08
-SG
-FD
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
E
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
m
i
d
d
l
e
g
a
p
a
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Fi
e
l
d
D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
.
MS
P
-08
-SO
-FD
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
E
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
m
i
d
d
l
e
g
a
p
a
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
.
Fi
e
l
d
D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
.
MS
P
-09
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
S
W
o
f
C
a
n
y
o
n
L
o
d
g
e
#
1
3
,
N
o
f
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-09
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
S
W
o
f
C
a
n
y
o
n
L
o
d
g
e
#
1
3
,
N
o
f
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-10
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
W
o
f
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
a
c
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-10
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
a
y
W
o
f
Qu
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
a
c
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-11
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
S
o
f
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-11
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
S
o
f
Q
u
i
k
P
i
k
M
a
r
k
e
t
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-12
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
In
t
h
e
N
W
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
b
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
o
i
l
g
a
s
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
MS
P
-12
-SO
So
i
l
In
t
h
e
N
W
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
M
i
d
v
a
l
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
b
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
o
i
l
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Ta
b
l
e
3
.
S
a
m
p
l
e
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
C
h
e
c
k
l
i
s
t
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
M
a
t
r
i
x
La
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
e
s
Q
A
/
Q
C
O
t
h
e
r
VOCs
SVOCs
Pesticides
Metals
PCB
Cyanide
Sulfide
Ammonia
NO3-NO2
Anions
Asbestos
Spec. Org.
BTEXN
TPH
O&G
Explosives
Field Dup.
Lab
MS/MSD
Split
Spike
Blank
Opportunity
Background
MS
P
-
0
1
-
S
G
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-01
-SO
So
i
l
X
X
MS
P
-02
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-02
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-
0
3
-
S
G
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-03
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-04
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-04
-SO
So
i
l
X
MP
S
-05
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-05
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-06
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-06
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-07
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-07
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-08
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-08
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-08
-SG
-FD
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
X
MS
P
-08
-SO
-FD
So
i
l
X
X
MS
P
-09
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-09
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-10
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-10
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-11
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
MS
P
-11
-SO
So
i
l
X
MS
P
-12
-SG
So
i
l
G
a
s
X
X
MS
P
-12
-SO
So
i
l
X
X
APPENDIX A
Site Health and Safety Plan
Health and Safety Plan
Maple Street Plume
Midvale, Utah
A. Site Hazard Evaluation
Previous sampling at the Site indicate the presence of tetrachloroethene (PCE),
trichloroethene (TCE), and benzene in soil gas; and the presence of PCE in groundwater.
The primary exposure pathways include adsorption through the skin and inhalation of
vapors volatilized from contaminated soil or groundwater. The relatively low
concentrations detected at the Site do not present an acute exposure risk to those
collecting the samples. No other known environmental or chemical hazards exist at the
Site. No special site entry procedures will be necessary. On-site hazards include slip, trip,
and falls; weather related hazards; and hazards associated with working around a direct-
push unit, including underground hazards such as utility lines.
B. Site Investigation Team
Wes Sandlin Project Manager
TBD Site Health & Safety Officer
C. Personal Protection Equipment (PPE)
Based on the minimum exposure expectation at the Site, Level D personal protective
equipment (PPE) will be worn by workers at all times. However, if site conditions change
during sampling activities, all work on-Site will stop and the appropriate PPE level will
be re-evaluated.
D. Surveillance and Monitoring Equipment
On-Site air monitoring will not be required based on characteristics and concentrations of
likely exposure.
E. Disposal of Investigation Derived Material
Decontamination solutions and used PPE will be handled, stored, and disposed of
appropriately.
F. Emergency Information
Police, Fire, Medical, and other Emergencies 911
Intermountain Medical Center (route map attached) 801-507-7000
Local City/County Health Department 385-468-4100
Utah Poison Control Center 1-800-222-1222
Blue Stake Location Service 1-800-662-4111
APPENDIX B
Consent for Access to Property