DSHW-2015-007867 - 0901a0688054d13f

WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
N ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
UTi> 0^33055^
Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
JUL 2 3 2015
PHASE ! ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
FORMER COWBOY OIL FACILITY
1710 WEST 2600 SOUTH
WOODS CROSS, UTAH
Project No. 1081-2
To
Mr. Kenny Custer
Idaho Asphalt Supply, Inc.
POB 50538
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83405
July 21, 2004
24 10 WEST CALIFORNIA A VENUE
SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84104
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
a-mail: [e-mail]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Table of Contents
1. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND 1
2. INTRODUCTION 2
2.1 Purpose 2
2.2 Detailed Scope of Work 2
2.3 Limitations and Expectations of Assessment 2
2.4 Special Terms and Conditions 3
2.5 Reliance 3
SITE DESCRIPTION 3
3.1 Location 3
3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics 3
3.3 Current Uses of the Property 3
3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the Site 3
3.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties 4
4. USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4
4.1 Environmental Liens/Activity Use and Limitations 4
4.2 Specialized Knowledge and Helpful Documents 4
4.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues 6
4.4 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information 6
4.5 Reason for Performing Phase I 6
5. RECORDS REVIEW 6
5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources, Federal and State 6
5.2 Additional Record Sources 8
5.2.1 Davis County Health Department 8
5.2.2 Fire Department 9
5.2.3 Sewer District 9
5.2.4 Division of Water Quality 9
5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) 9
5.3.1 Topographic Map 9
5.3.2 Regional Hydrogeology 9
5.3.3 Site Hydrogeology 10
5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property 10
5.4.1 Ownership History and Recorded Environmental Liens 10
5.4.2 Historic Topographic Maps 10
5.4.3 Interviews with Prior Owners 11
5.4.4 Onsite Documentation 11
5.4.5 Aerial Photographs 12
5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties (to the extent identified) 12
6. SITE RECONNAISSANCE 13
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions 13
6.2 Office/Shop Building 13
6.3 Southwest AST Farm 13
6.4 Thermo Fluids 13
6.5 Emulsion Plant and Polymer Modified Asphalt Manufacturing plant 14
6.6 Perimeter ASTs 14
6.7 Foreland Operation 14
6.8 Commercial Fueling Area 15
6.9 Current Condition of Interceptor Trench and Air Sparge Remediation System 15
7. JULY 2004 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 15
8. INTERVIEWS 16
8.1 Interview with Owner 16
9. FINDINGS AND OPINIONS 17
10. CONCLUSIONS 19
Figure 1 - Area Map
Figure 2 - Site Map
Figure 2a - Sample Location Map
Figure 3 - Topographic Map
Figure 4 -1963 Aerial Photograph
Figure 5 -1973 Aerial Photograph
Figure 6 -1983 Aerial Photograph
Figure 7 -1998 Aerial Photograph
Table 1 - Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Data Summary
Site Photographs
Appendix A - Quarterly Groundwater Sample Location Information
Appendix B - Government Database Information
Appendix C - Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste Inspector Report for Thermo Fluids
Appendix D - Leaking Underground Storage Tank Closure Documents
Appendix E - Davis County Health Department Letter
Appendix F - Ownership History, Recorded Environmental Lien and Activity and Use Limitation Search
Appendix G - Historic Maps
Appendix H - Westec Document
Appendix I - July 2004 Groundwater Sampling Laboratory Data
Appendix J - Qualifications of Environmental Professionals
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
FORMER COWBOY OIL FACILITY
1710 WEST 2600 SOUTH
WOODS CROSS, UTAH
1. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND
We have conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the former Cowboy Oil facility
located at 1720 West 2600 South in Woods Cross, Utah (see Figures 1 and 2). The subject site
consists of approximately 20 acres that includes an asphalt emulsion plant, used-oil recycling
operation, roofing asphalt plant, and commercial fuel dispensing. The site map presented as Figure
2 is not intended to accurately delineate contractual leased area but is intended for reference
purposes to depict major occupant areas.
The subject site has a long and complex history of occupants and uses since at least the early 1960s
and possibly the late 1950s. Based on interviews, the first industrial use of the property has been
traced to a company referred to as Black Oil that developed the property for fuel blending and
storage. The original facility was reportedly dismantled by Chevron Oil Company sometime in the
late 1960s or early 1970s and rebuilt for refining by Cowboy Oil. Refining operations reportedly
ceased in approximately 1981 and the property continued to be utilized for fuel blending, bulk
petroleum and asphalt storage, and distribution. A 1995 tank inventory provided to Wasatch
identified 45 above ground storage tanks (ASTs) ranging in size from 10,000 to over 1,000,000
gallons, 12 loading/unloading racks, and dispenser and transfer piping associated with the ASTs.
In approximately 1996, Crown Energies purchased the property for bulk storage and distribution of
asphalt products. Crown then constructed an emulsion manufacturing plant and polymer modified
asphalt manufacturing plant.
Multiple spills and releases have occurred on the subject site over the years, and soil and
groundwater impacts are known to currently exist. The site has been subject to previous
investigations and remediation efforts. Reports and documentation that we have reviewed as part of
this assessments include the following:
• A 1991 Investigation Report and Corrective Action Plan prepared by Wasatch for Cowboy
Refinery for the Cowboy Refinery site;
• A1995 site assessment prepared by Wasatch that covered the former Genesis lease area
(currently occupied by Thermo Fluids);
• A1998 RETECH Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the Genesis
lease area;
• Laboratory reports associated with quarterly groundwater sampling events conducted
between June 2000 and April 2004 by onsite personnel.
In 1992, Wasatch Environmental installed a soil and groundwater remediation system at the Cowboy
facility. The system involves total fluids capture through interceptor trenches. The system was
designed to pump 0.5 gallons per minute of total fluids into two above ground storage tanks with a
combined capacity of 16,000 gallons. Biological treatment of the extracted groundwater is
accomplished through air sparging in the storage tanks and air sparge wells at points within the
interceptor trenches. The treated groundwater discharges to the South Davis County Sewer
Improvement District under permit which is renewed annually.
In 1991,16 monitoring wells were present on the subject site. Currently, eight monitoring wells have
been located. Wasatch personnel collected groundwater samples from seven monitoring wells and
collected free product samples from one monitoring well (MW B-4) and one air-sparge well.
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
1
Laboratory results from the July 2004 sampling round, combined with laboratory results from
previous investigations and sampling rounds indicate that the primary impacts to soil and
groundwater at the site are from petroleum hydrocarbons. Off site sources migrating onto the site
are not suspected. At the time of this assessment, the interceptor trench system did not appear to be
functioning properly, increasing the potential for groundwater impacts to be migrating off site.
Detailed discussion is presented in the following sections of this report
2. INTRODUCTION
This assessment was conducted within the scope and limitations of the Standard Practice for
Environmental Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process as presented in
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard E 1527-00. This practice is intended to
reflect a commercially prudent and reasonable inquiry to identify recognized environmental
conditions in connection with a property.
2.1 Purpose
The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is to identify, to the extent
feasible pursuant to the processes described in ASTM E 1527-00, recognized environmental
conditions in connection with the property.
2.2 Detailed Scope of Work
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been conducted in general accordance
with ASTM E 1527-00 and consists of four components: 1) Records Review, 2) Site
Reconnaissance, 3) Interviews, and 4) Report.
There may be environmental issues or conditions at a property that parties may wish to
assess in connection with commercial real estate that are outside the scope of the ASTM E
1527-00 practice. Several non-scope considerations include (but are not limited to)
asbestos, lead paint, wetlands, and radon. No implication is intended as to the relative
importance of inquiry into such non-scope considerations, nor is this list intended to be all-
inclusive.
This assessment included collection of groundwater samples from seven onsite wells, and
collection of free product from monitoring well B-4 and one air sparge well.
2.3 Limitations and Expectations of Assessment
Although the potential risks and liabilities associated with real estate transactions can be
minimized by conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, they cannot be
completely eliminated. Limitations exist as to the availability of documentation and
constraints of visual and/or physical observations. This assessment has been undertaken
within reasonable limits of time and cost. Accuracy and completeness of record information
varies among information sources, including government sources. The information provided
has not been independently verified, unless we have actual knowledge or it appears obvious
that certain information is incorrect. The information presented in this report shall not be
interpreted as a warranty as to the presence or non-presence of recognized environmental
conditions in connection with the property.
Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance
with generally accepted environmental site assessment principles and practices. This
warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
2.4 Special Terms and Conditions
An environmental site assessment performed in accordance with ASTM E 1527-00 is
presumed to be valid for at least 180 days. After 180 days or if information regarding
recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property becomes
known, then portions of the environmental site assessment should be updated.
2.5 Reliance
This report is prepared for the sole benefit of Idaho Asphalt Supply, Inc., and may not be
relied upon by any other person or entity without the written authorization of Wasatch
Environmental, Inc.
SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Location
The subject property consists of approximately 20 acres generally referred to as 1710 West
2600 South in Woods Cross, Utah. The site is located near the western quarter corner of
Section 35 of Township 2 North Range 1 West (see Figure 3).
3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics
The subject site and general vicinity would be characterized as a combination
industrial and commercial, with the Skypark Airport runway to the west and hangars
to the north and east.
3.3 Current Uses of the Property
Current uses of the property include an asphalt plant, bulk asphalt storage, used-oil
recycling, roofing asphalt manufacturing, and commercial fuel dispensing. The site map
presented as Figure 2 is not intended to accurately delineate contractual leased areas but is
intended for reference purposes to depict major occupant areas.
3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the Site
• Crown Asphalt structures and improvements include the masonry block office/shop
building that fronts 2600 South, the emulsion plant and polymer modified asphalt
manufacturing plant located in the extreme northwest corner of the property, bulk
storage tanks located along the northeast and east property boundaries, and a
stormwater retention pond and associated collection/discharge AST located in the center
of the property. An April 2001 DMK Environmental Engineering report identifies the
following list of equipment owned or operated by Crown Asphalt Products Company:
° Five natural gas fired asphalt tank heaters
° Eleven asphalt loading racks
° One gasoline receiving and loading rack
o Two horizontal tanks for biological water treatment process
o One Colloid Asphalt Mill
° One hot oil heater
o Thirty-one vertical fixed roof and five floating roof storage tanks.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
• Four ASTs and one loading rack located immediately north of the Crown Asphalt office
building are currently out of use, but were most recently used to receive, store, and
dispense aviation fuel.
• Thermo Fluids operates a used oil storage/processing facility that includes two areas: 1)
a 2,400 square-foot office building, two tank farms in concrete secondary containment,
and a truck loading area located along the west-central property boundary; and 2) a
bermed and lined tank farm located near the north-central property boundary. These
areas were previously used by Genesis Petroleum as a used oil re-refining and recycling
facility.
• The Foreland Refining Corporation manufactures roofing asphalt and occupies the
central portion of the property. Foreland includes several above ground storage tanks
and a slab-on-grade metal-frame "pour* building. The April 2001 DMK Environmental
Engineering report identifies the following list of equipment owned or operated by
Foreland Refining Corporation:
o One asphalt blowing still
° One asphalt heater
o One boiler
o One diesel scrubber
o Five asphalt tank heaters
° Three asphalt receiving and loading racks
o Several vertical fixed roof and three horizontal storage tanks.
• A commercial fueling center is situated near the southeast corner of the property and
includes four dispenser islands for diesel and gasoline, truck scales, and paved parking.
Four associated above ground storage tanks containing diesel and gasoline are located
north of the fueling area.
3.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties
The property is currently bordered to the west by the runway for the Skypark Airport. The
property is bordered to the north and northeast by airport hangars. The property is bordered
to the southeast by office buildings and to the south across 2600 South by an auto transport
facility.
4. USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
If the user is aware of any specialized knowledge or experience that is material to recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the property, it is the user's responsibility to
communicate any information based on such specialized knowledge or experience to the
environmental professional.
4.1 Environmental Liens/Activity Use and Limitations
No information regarding environmental liens or activity use/limitations land records has
been reported to us by Idaho Asphalt.
4.2 Specialized Knowledge and Helpful Documents
Representatives for Idaho Asphalt have informed us that they are aware that the subject site
is the location of a former oil refinery and bulk storage facility, that multiple spills and
releases have occurred on the subject site over the years, and that the site has been subject
to previous and current remediation efforts.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
4
We informed Idaho Asphalt that during the early and mid 1990s, Wasatch Environmental
conducted investigation and remediation activities at the subject site on behalf of Cowboy
Oil, including the design and installation of an interceptor trench and air sparging system that
is currently in place.
Idaho Asphalt arranged for Wasatch personnel to review documentation available onsite
related to previous environmental site assessments, spills and releases, investigation
activities, and groundwater monitoring analytical results.
We have reviewed an August 1998 "Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment, Genesis
Petroleum Lease Site" prepared by Remediation Technologies, Inc. (RETEC) for Thermo
Fluids. This assessment was conducted in anticipation of Thermo Fluids acquiring the
assets of Genesis Petroleum and occupying the Genesis Petroleum leased area of the
subject site. The 1998 RETEC activities included a review of previous subsurface
investigation reports (including documents prepared by Wasatch), advancing nine soil
borings in the Genesis/Thermo Fluids lease area, and collection of groundwater samples
from two existing monitoring wells. Approximate sample locations for the Thermo Fluids
investigation are shown on Figure 2. The three investigation areas were described as 1) the
north tank area, 2) the refinery area, and 3) the south tank area.
The RETEC sampling program included a wide range of analytical screening and the report
should be referred to for specific details. Overall, the results of the RETEC subsurface
sampling activities were similar to previous investigations in these areas. Soil and
groundwater impacts were identified in all three investigation areas. Hydrocarbon stained
soil was observed primarily within the first three feet of fill material in all but one boring. A
"heavy hydrocarbon" free product was observed in monitoring well MW-S located in the
south tank area. Benzene in groundwater was detected at concentrations above drinking
water standards in all three investigation areas, with the greatest benzene concentrations in
the south tank area.
In addition to petroleum hydrocarbons, low concentrations of 1,1-dichloroethane (13 ppb)
and cis-1,2-dichloroethene (5 ppb) were detected in Thermo Fluids GW-2. Concentrations of
acetone and MEK above EPA risk-based screening levels were detected in the monitoring
well containing free product (MW-S). MW-S was located adjacent to a waste-water AST. A
sample was collected from this waste-water AST and found to contain elevated
concentrations of acetone and MEK as well.
We have also reviewed groundwater monitoring data collected between June 2000 and April
2003 for groundwater samples collected by onsite personnel. Conflicting monitoring well
identification numbers, laboratory notations of headspace in samples jars, and inconsistency
in requested target analytes reduce the reliability of the sampling data. However, the
information is still useful as a trend indicator. A June 5, 2000 "Status Memorandum"
prepared by Patrick Smith that provides useful descriptions of monitoring well locations and
a corresponding monitoring well location map are included in Appendix A. A summary
prepared by Wasatch that presents laboratory data exceeding applicable regulatory
standards is also included in Appendix A. To the extent that the laboratory data can be
relied upon, elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons have been consistently
identified in monitoring wells B-2 and B-3 (located along the southern property boundary), B4
(located in the bermed "AV Fuel" tank area), B-9 (located in the access road between
Thermo Fluids and the west property boundary), and B-15 (previously located near a former
truck wash pad and oil pit). Notations on the laboratory reports combined with interviews
indicates that samples collected by onsite personal from B-4 often contained free product.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
5
4.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues
We have not been informed of any property valuation reduction for environmental issues by
Idaho Asphalt.
4.4 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant information
At the time we conducted our assessment, a clear understanding of current ownership was
not known but likely includes a combination of Cowboy Asphalt Terminal, Crown Asphalt
Distribution, Crown Asphalt Products Company, Foreland Refining, and CAPCO.
4.5 Reason for Performing Phase I
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is being conducted, to the extent feasible
pursuant to the processes described in ASTM E 1527-00, to identify recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the property to assist the client in satisfying one
of the requirements to qualify for the landowner liability protections to CERCLA.
5. RECORDS REVIEW
5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources, Federal and State
EDR (Environmental Data Resources) has conducted government database research for the
site (see Appendix B). Additional interviews with government agencies and follow-up
information was provided as noted below. It should be understood that the databases may
identify a site by the contact address of the company rather than the actual location of the
activity being permitted or investigated. Plotted locations are approximated.
In accordance with the ASTM-specified approximate minimum search distances, the
following standard environmental record sources were reviewed where available:
Approximate Minimum
Search Distance (miles)
Federal NPL site list 1.0
Federal CERCLIS list 0.5
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list property/adjoining properties
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1.0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0.5
Federal RCRA generators list property/adjoining properties
Federal ERNS list property only
State lists of hazardous waste sites identified for investigation or remediation:
State-equivalent NPL 1.0
State-equivalent CERCLIS 0.5
State landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0.5
State leaking UST lists 0.5
State registered UST lists property/adjoining properties
Additional supplemental databases were included in the EDR government records search
and are listed in Appendix B pages 4 and 5. Detailed descriptions of each database are
presented in Appendix B pages GR-1 through GR-10.
The subject site is identified by multiple standard and supplemental environmental record
sources (see Appendix B pages 6 through 9):
• The "Woods Cross Plant" is identified on the Toxic Substance Control Act database. No
additional information was provided for this database listing.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
6
• Thermo Fluids, one of the current tenants of the subject site, is identified as a RCRA
small quantity generator. RCRA violations are noted (see page 6). We have reviewed
inspection reports available through the Utah Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste
(DSHW) for the Thermo Fluids facility. Most of the concerns noted in the inspection
reports we reviewed were related to documentation, tracking omissions, storing oil in
unapproved tanks, and exceeding permitted storage capacity.
During the most recent annual inspection conducted in August 2003, DSHW personnel
noted two small punctures in the synthetic liner beneath the north tank farm but no
reports of releases or spills in the tank farm were noted. However, during the Thermo
Fluids inspection, DSHW personnel observed a trench that was being excavated east of
the Thermo Fluids operation. The DSHW inspection record notes groundwater had filled
the bottom of the trench and "there was a black oil product on the surface of this water.
In some portions of the trench, the entire surface of the water was covered with this
black oil... The oil did not look like used oil. It was black like asphalt tar but less
viscous. It may oe [original emphasis] that this oil is the source of the oil water that
seeps into the southern secondary containment nearby.* The report goes on to say that
representatives from Thermo Fluids stated that a "tar substance has been oozing out of
the ground in the paved parking area on hot days" in the southeast portion of the parking
lot located south of the Thermo Fluids office. A copy of the August 2003 inspection
report is included as Appendix C. The inspection report notes that photographs of the
trenches have been forwarded to Allan Moore of the Hazardous Waste Branch and
Cheryl Prawl of the Planning/Used Oil Section. In a follow up interview with the DSHW
inspector Dave Wheeler, Mr. Wheeler stated that the source of the product observed in
the trench was unknown but he determined it did not originate from Thermo Fluids
operations. He was not aware of any follow up or additional inquiry by his department
regarding the observed product.
• Cowboy Oil, former owner and operator of the subject site, is listed on the underground
storage tank, leaking underground storage tank, and above ground storage tank
databases. Cowboy Oil was reported as a leaking underground storage tank site in May
2001 and received regulatory closure in October 2003. According to information
available through the Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, two waste
oil tanks were removed from outside the office/shop area. Minimal soil impacts were
encountered during the excavation. Interestingly, the tank closure documents note that
groundwater was not encountered and therefore no groundwater samples were collected.
A copy of the Utah RBCA Tier 1 Worksheet and No Further Action Letter are included
as Appendix D.
• Crown Asphalt Products is listed on the Toxic Release Inventory System database and
listed as a RCRIS small quantity generator. The EDR report notes that RCRA violations
exist for the Crown Asphalt facility. However, the Utah Division of Solid and Hazardous
Waste was unable to locate a state file for the Crown Asphalt facility.
• Genesis Petroleum, a former tenant of the subject site, is identified as a RCRIS small
quantity generator. The EDR report notes that RCRA violations exist for the Genesis
facility. However, the Utah Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste was unable to locate
a state file for Genesis Petroleum. Documents included in the DSHW files for Thermo
Fluids indicate that Thermo Fluids purchased the assets of Genesis Petroleum.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
7
• AVFuel Corporation, a former tenant of the subject site, is identified as an above ground
storage tank facility. According to January 1991 tank registration information available
through the Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, AVFuel utilized
one 630,000-gallon above ground storage tank and one 33,600-gailon above ground
storage tank at the site. No additional information was contained in the state file.
In addition to the above-listed facilities identified on the subject site, the following facilities
sites were identified within ASTM-specified approximate minimum search distances:
• RCRA CORRACTS (Corrective Action) facilities are those which have conducted or are
currently conducting a corrective action as regulated under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act. EDR identifies Crysen Refining (2355 South 1100 West) and Golden
Eagle Oil Refining (1474 West 1500 South) within an approximate minimum search
distance of one mile. According to information available through the Utah Division of
Solid and Hazardous Waste, multiple releases have been documented from both Crysen
and Golden Eagle. Information contained in the state files does not provide insight as to
whether releases from these facilities have or could have impacted the subject site.
However, given onsite sampling data collection since 1991, there has been no indication
of a potential offsite source from the east/northeast impacting the subject site.
• According to EDR, one adjoining property, Neil's Used Truck and Car Sales/Auto
Transport located at 695 West 1100 South, is identified as a registered UST facility and
a RCRA generator (see Appendix B pages 9 and 10). This facility is located adjacent
south across 2600 South (the south side of 2600 South is located within North Salt Lake
city boundaries and utilizes a completely different address number coordinate system).
The Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste informed us that the state RCRA file for
Neil's has been archived, indicating that there have been no RCRA-related inspections
or generator records for at least six years. Additionally, Neil's has not been reported as a
Leaking Underground Storage Tank site.
• Foreland Transportation is identified as a RCRA small quantity generator at 2561 South
1560 West. While this address is not situated adjacent to the subject site and would
therefore not be located in the ASTM-specified approximate minimum search distances,
Foreland leases a portion of the subject site. Therefore, we requested information from
the Division of Solid and Hazardous waste regarding the RCRA violations identified in
the EDR report (see Appendix B page 10). The records we reviewed indicated that the
violation issues were not associated with activities on the subject site.
Additional Record Sources
5.2.1 Davis County Health Department
We have contacted Dave Spence with the Davis County Health Department
regarding reports of spills or releases at the subject site. A July 14, 2004 written
response is included in Appendix E. Mr. Spence notes that his department has
received public complaints over the years relating to "air, water, and soil quality" in
the general area. Specific responses to the subject site noted by Mr. Spence
include:
• A May 1985 tanker rollover that released approximately 14,500 gallons of crude
oil that was primarily contained in the ditch along 2600 South;
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
8
• A 1991 spill from an unknown source that was believed to have been on going for
some time;
• A June 1993 release of unleaded gasoline.
Additionally, Mr. Spence notes that Skypark Aiport and Cowboy Oil had numerous
tanks and potential problems that were mentioned in the department files.
Subsequent to providing his written response, Mr. Spence contacted us on July 21,
2004 regarding an emergency response on Saturday July 17, 2004. Petroleum
product was discovered in the storm drain and ditch that runs along the south side of
2600 South. A buried pipeline containing crude oil was discovered along 2600 South
that then turned south and entered Cowboy Oil near the east property boundary.
Utilizing a camera, a leak was found in the crude line farther east along 2600 South.
Mr. Spence stated that they were trying to determine who owns the line and who
might be responsible for the cleanup.
5.2.2 Fire Department
We have interviewed South Davis Fire Chief Brent Argyle. Chief Argyle informed us
that prior to 1978 the subject site was in an area serviced by a volunteer fire
department and few if any documents were kept While Chief Argyle was familiar
with the subject site and familiar with the refining industry, he had no specific
information related to activities conducted on the subject site.
5.2.3 Sewer District
We have contacted Dal Wayment and Lyndon Tan with the South Davis Sewer
District. They informed us that discharge permits have been issued for the subject
site for wastewater discharge from the cut-off trench water collection system, and for
the stormwater collection described in Section 6.3.1. These permits are reviewed
annually and are currently in force. They were not aware of any improper discharges
or compliance problems since at least 2000.
5.2.4 Division of Water Quality
We have contacted Mark Novak and Rob Herbert with the Division of Water Quality.
They were not aware of any current action items associated with the subject site nor
were they involved in a corrective action oversight at this time.
Physical Setting Source(s)
5.3.1 Topographic Map
The 1975 topographic map presented as Figure 3 shows the approximate location of
the subject property. The property has an elevation of approximately 4,235 feet
sloping gently to the west. Topographic features indicative of above ground storage
tanks are depicted on the northern portion of the site. The Skypark Airport is
depicted to the west. No surface water is depicted on or adjacent to the subject site.
5.3.2 Regional Hydrogeology
Groundwater within the north Salt Lake Valley occurs in two principal aquifer
horizons: the shallow unconfined aquifer which extends from ground surface to an
estimated depth of 50 feet; and the deep confined aquifer which extends below a
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
depth of about 100 feet and is considered to be the principal aquifer. The principal
aquifer in this portion of the valley is considered to have a low susceptibility to
shallow groundwater contamination due to a confining clay layer and an upward
hydraulic gradient.
In the area around and including the site, the shallow unconfined aquifer occurs in a
clay or silty clay soil and groundwater moves very slowly through the clay. The
shallow unconfined aquifer is not considered a potable water supply in this portion of
the valley due to high concentrations of dissolved solids (State of Utah Department
of Natural Resources Technical Publication No. 21).
5.3.3 Site Hydrogeology
We have reviewed information from several previous site investigation reports
regarding subsurface conditions at the subject site. The most recent subsurface
data was obtained from the RETECH drilling activities conducted in August 1998 and
presented in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the
Genesis Petroleum Lease Site on behalf of Thermo Fluids. The RETECH
investigation consisted of advancing nine borings in the Thermo Fluids lease area.
Subsurface soils consisted of one to three feet of gravel fill material underlain by
silts and clays with thin intervals of interbedded sand. Depth to groundwater was
generally two to three feet below grade.
These subsurface conditions are consistent with those encountered during previous
investigations conducted by Wasatch. Groundwater flow was not measured during
the RETECH investigation; however, previous investigation conducted by Wasatch
indicated groundwater flow to the west-southwest.
Historical Use Information on the Property
5.4.1 Ownership History and Recorded Environmental Liens
D.W. Moore & Associates, Inc., has conducted an ownership history and
environmental lien search for the subject property. This search is intended to assist
in identifying historic uses of the property and is not a complete listing of recorded
instruments affecting the subject site. The results of this search are included in
Appendix F.
The Tract Indexes of the Davis County Recorder were searched from 1935 through
July 2004. No environmental liens affecting the subject property were reported.
Previous ownership includes Clinton Mills (1935 to 1962) and Keith L. Winegar
(1962 to 1967). A 1962 deed identifies California Oil Company. A 1967 Sheriffs
Deed identifies Chevron Oil Company and a 1968 Warranty Deed identifies Chevron
Asphalt Company.
In 1971, the property was acquired by Dunn Oil and Denton Lee Dunn. From 1974
through 2001, several transactions identify Dale Hancock, Cowboy Oil, and
Hancock-Geisler. It is our understanding that Dale Hancock and Dick Geisler were
the business partners for Cowboy Oil.
5.4.2 Historic Topographic Maps
The 1951 and 1963 7.5-minute U.S.G.S. Salt Lake City North quadrangle
topographic maps are presented in Appendix G. The 1951 map depicts the subject
site as primarily vacant land with a small section of the Sky Haven Airport runway
intersecting the extreme northeast comer of the property. No structures, roads, or
other indications of developed property use are depicted on or adjacent to the
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
10
subject site. The 1963 map depicts a structure on the southern end of the site which
generally corresponds with the location of structures visible on the 1963 aerial
photograph presented as Figure 4 and described in Section 5.4.4. With the
exception of the Sky Haven Airfield, no other structures, roads, or other indications
of developed property use are depicted on or adjacent to the subject site.
5.4.3 Interviews with Prior Owners
We have attempted to contact personnel at Chevron who may have information
regarding the facility. We have provided ownership history information and a site
map. No current Chevron personnel have been referred to us for an interview.
However, we have interviewed Mr. Harry McSwain who has been involved with
subleases on the subject site over the years. Mr. McSwain informed us that he was
working for Chevron at the time Chevron acquired the subject site. He stated that he
believed the company that constructed the original plant was Black Oil (or a similar
name). Black Oil purchased significant volumes of product from Chevron for fuel
blending. Chevron reportedly acquired the property due to an outstanding debt owed
by Black Oil. Mr. McSwain had been asked by Chevron to visit the plant at the time
of acquisition. He stated that the "place was a mess* but did not provide specific
details. He was not aware of what activities Chevron actually conducted on the site,
if any. Mr. McSwain was later involved with the subject site when his company,
Crysen, leased above ground tanks for asphalt storage.
We interviewed Mr. Denton (Denny) Dunn with Dunn Oil. According to Mr. Dunn,
Dunn Oil purchased the subject site from Chevron in 1971 to facilitate a property
transfer to Cowboy Oil. He stated that Dunn Oil had not operated on the subject site.
He stated that at the time of acquisition, Chevron had vacated the premises and
dismantled most of the facility. He had walked through the property and did not recall
any significant concerns brought to his attention.
We have contacted Mr. Dale Hancock who currently resides in Pocatello, Idaho. Mr.
Hancock informed us that he was not familiar with onsite operations at the Woods
Cross facility and suggested we contact Mr. Dick Geisler. We have attempted to
interview Mr. Dick Geisler in St George, Utah. To date, he has not returned our call.
Additional information provided by Mr. McSwain, combined with onsite documents
we have reviewed, indicates that Morrison Petroleum leased part of the subject site
during the 1970s and early 1980s. Mr. McSwain stated that Morrison Petroleum
constructed a topping plant near the northwest corner of the property and that Ted
Morrison and Dick Geisler had a crude oil pipeline installed that tapped into the
Amoco Oil pipeline located to the east The line apparently ran down 2600 South
and turned onto the property at the southeast comer and daylights near the northeast
comer of the property. The flow of oil from the crude line was metered and
electronically controlled by an Amoco LAC unit or custody transfer unit.
5.4.4 Onsite Documentation
Information obtained from onsite documents indicates that former tenants also
included Wetec Petroleum, Basin Western, Crysen Refining, and Jardine Petroleum.
Correspondence from Westecto the Utah Division of Air Quality indicates that
Westec leased 11 above ground tanks from Cowboy Oil for "the purpose of
wholesaling of blended motor fuels." A 1993 chemical inventory report identifies
various blending and additive products stored by Westec. An undated site map
depicts the layout of the subject site at the time Westec occupied the property.
Other occupants identified on the site map include Basin Western, Cowboy Oil, and
Crysen Refining facility. Documents related to Westec are included in Appendix H.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
11
In approximately 1996, Crown Energies purchased the property for bulk storage and
distribution of asphalt products. Crown then constructed an emulsion manufacturing
plant and polymer modified asphalt manufacturing plant
5.4.5 Aerial Photographs
Intermountain Aerial Surveys has provided photos of the area that includes the site
taken in 1963,1973,1983 and 1998 (approximate scale 1"=200'). Copies are
presented as Figures 4, 5,6 and 7, respectfve/y.
The 1963 photograph depicts the subject site at the time Keith Winegar and
California Oil were identified in the Ownership History Report Industrial activity and
several above ground storage tanks are visible on the southern end of the property.
Dark coloration in an apparent industrial area east of the onsite building may be
indicative of a large pit or surface staining. Runways for the Skypark Airport are
visible to the northwest and northeast Surface conditions to the west of the property .
indicate high groundwater conditions.
The 1973 photograph depicts the subject site after the property was acquired by
Dunn Oil. The current office building is visible in the south-central area of the
property and multiple storage tank farms are visible throughout the developed areas
of the property. Areas of possible staining are visible around the office/shop building
and around the tanks farms. A possible trench or canal is visible between two areas
in the northern section of the developed portion of the property. ASTs are also
visible along the eastern property area and possible ponds or surface spill areas are
present
The 1983 photograph depicts developed use of the entire property. The tank farms
have been expanded to the property boundaries and the southeast comer of the
property appears to be used for storage. A concrete pad indicates a fueling area is
present fronting 2600 South. The office/shop building has been expanded to its
current size and surface discoloration is visible around the building. An area of what
appears to be significant staining is visible in the approximate center of the property
just east of the current "AV Fuel" tank farm. Additional staining is apparent east of
the AV Fuel tank farm. Previous investigations identify this area as an "oil pit" and a
truck wash area. The product diversion canal identified in earlier site maps is visible
extending north towards the Morrison Petroleum topping plant The crude oil
pipeline described by Mr. McSwain in Section 5.4.2 is clearly visible on the east
property boundary between the two northeasternmost above ground tanks.
The 1998 photograph depicts the subject site with many of the same tank farms. The
Morrison Petroleum topping plant has been dismantled and the west-central property
area is occupied by Genesis or possibly the initial occupancy of Thermo Fluids. A
new fueling area and associated above ground storage tanks are present fronting
2600 South. This photograph pre-dates the Foreland operation.
Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties (to the extent Identified)
Based on historic aerial photographs and topographic maps, the property has been bordered
to the west, north, and east by a combination of vacant undeveloped land and routes of the
Skypark Airport runway. Prior to commercial development in the 1980s, the property has
been bordered to the south across 2600 South by vacant undeveloped land.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
12
6. SITE RECONNAISSANCE
A site reconnaissance was conducted on July 9 and 15, 2004. We were accompanied by
Crown Asphalt vice president Scott Bead and Crown Asphalt general manager Mike Barrett.
A current site layout map is presented as Figure 2. Figure 2 is not intended to accurately
delineate contractual leased areas but is intended for reference purposes to depict major
occupant areas.
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
Our reconnaissance of the property included observations of the approximate perimeter of
the subject property, the property interior, readily accessible areas of the interior of the
buildings and a cursory observation of the adjoining properties. For the purposes of this
assessment, the commercial fueling area was included in our reconnaissance.
6.2 Office/Shop Building
The office/shop building is located near the northwest comer of the property. Based on
aerial photography and interviews, this building was originally constructed in the early 1970s.
The south end of the building is comprised of first and second-story office space and labs.
Abandoned floor drains were observed in the eastern-most lab.
Two shop areas extend north from the office/lab portion of the building. The shop area is
currently used for storage including drums of latex solvent, sacks of gilsonite ore, and latex
totest Abandoned floor drains were observed in the shop area. It is our understanding that
the floor drains historically discharged to the underground storage tanks that were removed
from outside the shop building (see Section 5.1).
Outside the north wall of the office/shop building, several drums, containers, and sacks were
observed. Products included acids, liquid caustic soda, surfactants, emulsifiers, and drums
of heat transfer fluid.
6.3 Southwest AST Farm
Four above ground storage tanks (three 70,000 gallon and one 20,000 gallon) and an
associated loading rack are located directly north of the office/shop building. In addition to
the large ASTs, one approximately 250-gallon tank was observed. According to Mr. Barrett,
the smaller tank was a sampling discharge tank. These tanks sit on a gravel bed surrounded
by an earthen secondary containment. Monitoring well B4 is located within this secondary
containment.
These tanks are currently empty but, based on aerial photography, these may be some of
the oldest tanks on the site and have been used to store any number of products for various
owners or tenants. At the time of our reconnaissance, significant staining was observed in
this area. Mr. Barrett was familiar with most of the tanks and service lines. However, there
were some dormant lines observed that he was not familiar with.
6.4 Thermo Fluids
Thermo Fluids operates a used oil storage/processing facility on the west-central portion of
the property. The facility consists of an office/lab building, two AST farms in concrete
secondary containment, a drum storage area, and a loading rack originally constructed by
Genesis in the mid 1990s. One above ground storage tank is located outside the
northernmost secondary containment.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
13
Stormwater that collects within the secondary containment is pumped through an API
separator and through an oil/water separator prior to discharge to sanitary sewer. No
significant surface staining was observed in the Thermo Fluids secondary containment or
drum storage area.
A third Thermo Fluids AST farm is located on the north-central property area. Several
above ground storage tanks sit in a combination concrete/earthern secondary containment
with a synthetic liner. Stormwater that collects in the secondary containment is pumped to
the Thermo Fluids separators discussed above. However, at the time of our reconnaissance,
approximately one foot of standing water with a slight sheen was observed in the secondary
containment. As discussed in Section 5.1, two small holes were discovered in the synthetic
liner during the August 2003 DSHW annual inspection.
6.5 Emulsion Plant and Polymer Modified Asphalt Manufacturing plant
The emulsion plant and polymer modified asphalt manufacturing plant occupy the northwest
comer of the subject site. This area includes a production building to modify asphalt and
produce emulsion and an associated AST farm in concrete secondary containment.
Significant surface staining was observed below the heat transfer oil tank and below several
of the heat transfer distribution lines. East of the production building are recently
constructed heat exchangers and product piping that are not yet in service.
A stormwater collection pond was observed in the approximate north-central portion of the
property, it is our understanding that surface water is channeled into the collection pond.
After a period of time, the collected water is pumped into a nearby AST. The stormwater is
then sampled by South Davis Sewer District prior to discharge into the sanitary sewer.
6.6 Perimeter ASTs
Nine large product storage ASTs are located along the northern and eastern perimeter of the
site. Aboveground piping runs from these tanks throughout the property. Remnants of a
loading rack were observed near the southeasternmost tank. The terminating point of a
crude oil pipeline was observed entering the property from the east property boundary
between the two northeasternmost ASTs.
The ASTs sit on gravel and are surrounded by earthen secondary containment. It is our
understanding that these tanks have most recently been used to stored asphalt products.
Aerial photographs and interviews date most of these tanks to the mid 1970s when the
property was used primarily for blending and bulk storage of petroleum products. At the time
of our reconnaissance, significant amounts of black surface staining was observed around
the perimeter ASTs. Most of the staining observed during our reconnaissance was likely
asphalt products.
Waste asphalt product, discarded drums and containers, and other general solid waste was
observed throughout the northeastern property. A drum and container storage area was
observed north of the Foreland operation. The drums contained heat transfer fluid,
absorbent material, and emulsifiers. Many of the drums were stored on pallets, however,
significant staining was observed on the gravel surface in this drum storage area.
6.7 Foreland Operation
Foreland occupies the approximate center of the property for the production of roofing
asphalt. The Foreland facility includes several ASTs, a small compressor and boiler
building, and a slab-on-grade metal frame "pour" building where the final product is
containerized.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
14
The largest AST used by Foreland reportedly holds light asphalt At the time of our
walkover, product was leaking from this tank and pooling in a depressed area to the west
Significant soil staining was observed around the processing tank and scrubber that Foreland
apparently no longer uses.
A constant spray of water is applied to the outside of the light product condensate tanks. At
the time of our walkover, wastewater was observed discharging from this process to a
depressed area adjacent east of the stormwater retention pond. A petroleum sheen was
observed on the wastewater stream and surface and vegetation staining around the
depressed area where the waste water was collecting indicated that this had been occurring
over an extended period.
Large electrical transformers were observed in a fenced area immediately southwest of the
Foreland pour building, it is our understanding that the transformers are no longer in use. It
is highly probable that these transformers contain PCBs.
6.8 Commercial Fueling Area
A commercial fueling area and truck scales are located along the south-central property
area. The fueling area includes four dispenser islands that are serviced by ASTs surrounded
by concrete secondary containment to the north. The current remediation equipment for the
cut-off trench is located adjacent west of the ASTs.
6.9 Current Condition of Interceptor Trench and Air Sparge Remediation System
At the time of our assessment Wasatch personnel inspected the various components of the
cut-off trench remediation system. Several of the components were found to be inoperable.
Each of the manhole covers for the air sparge lines were removed and the condition of the
lines and wells inspected. Several of the sparge lines appeared to be broken. Free oil
product was found in the air sparge weil located between the commercial fuel islands and the
office/shop building.
7. JULY 2004 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
On July 12, 2004, Wasatch personnel conducted groundwater sampling activities at the
subject site. Depth to water measurements and groundwater samples were obtained from
monitoring wells: B-1, B-2, B-3, B-7, B-9, B-14a and B-16. Monitoring wells AP-1 and AP-3,
located on airport property, were not sampled because they were dry. In addition, monitoring
well B~4 was not sampled because of the presence of free product Free product was also
observed in the air sparge well located between the commercial fuel islands and the
office/shop building. However, free product thickness measurements could not be obtained
from either the air sparge well or monitoring well B-4 due to the high viscosity of the product
Prior to purging, depth to groundwater measurements were collected at each monitoring well.
The depth to groundwater measurements were obtained with an electronic down-hole water
level probe. The water level probe was decontaminated between each monitoring well with a
denatured alcohol wash and tap water rinse.
Prior to sampling, all monitoring wells were purged a minimum of three well casing volumes
using disposable polyethylene bailers. Purge water was poured over the ground surface
near each monitoring well location. Groundwater samples were then collected using
disposable polyethylene bailers. The samples were transferred to 40 milliliter VOC vials,
immediately stored on ice in a cooler, and transported under chain-of-custody protocol to a
Utah-certified analytical laboratory.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
15
The groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and total
petroleum hydrocarbons-gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO) using U.S. EPA Method
8260B. Groundwater samples were also analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel
range organics (TPH-DRO) using U.S. EPA Method 8015B. In addition, free product
samples were collected from the air sparge well and monitoring well B-4. These samples
were submitted for product identification analyses. Laboratory results are included in
Appendix I.
Groundwater analytical results indicate that TPH-DRO was detected in the groundwater
samples obtained from monitoring wells B-2, B-3, B-7, B-9, B-14a and B-16 in
concentrations that exceed the Utah action level of 0.500 mg/L. Benzene was detected in
the groundwater samples obtained from monitoring wells B-2, B-3 and B-9 at concentrations
of 8.2 ug/L, 190 ug/L and 7.9 ug/L, respectively, in exceedance of its federal Maximum
Contaminant Level (MCL) of 5 ug/L. All other detected constituents were reported at
concentrations below current action levels. The presence of MTBE, while below action
levels, indicates the potential for a more recent release. Also, analytical results presented in
the 1991 Wasatch report identified vinyl chloride in MW B-9 (140 ug/L). During the July 2004
groundwater sampling event, vinyl chloride was detected in the groundwater sample
obtained from MW B-9 at a concentration of 1.5 ug/L, below the federal MCL (Maximum
Contaminant Level) of 2.0 ug/L.
Free product analytical results indicate that the sample obtained from monitoring well B-4 is
comprised of gasoline range organics and unweathered diesel fuel. The product obtained
from the air sparge well appears to be comprised of 25% weathered diesel fuel.
8. INTERVIEWS
Interviews were conducted in an effort to obtain information regarding recognized environmental
conditions in connection with the property. Exceptions or deviations from standard interview sources
are noted below.
8.1 Interview with Owner
We have interviewed Mike Barrett and Scott Beall, representatives for Crown Asphalt.
Crown Asphalt acquired the subject site as part of a multi-party transaction that occurred in
approximately 1996. At that time, the property was owned by Cowboy Oil and used primarily
for bulk storage of asphalt products. According to Mr, Barrett, Crown Asphalt was aware of
previous investigation and remediation activities, including the operating cut-off trench and
has made efforts to continue operation of the cut-off trench and conduct quarterly sampling
from all known existing monitoring wells. With the exception of occasional surface spills
representatives from Crown Asphalt were not aware of any significant releases of petroleum
products that have occurred at the subject site since they have occupied the property.
We have interviewed Mr. Larry Bardwell, environmental consultant for Crown Asphalt. Mr.
Bardwell informed us that he was involved in the underground storage tank removal
approximately four years ago. Otherwise, he has provided few if any additional services for
Crown Asphalt at the subject site and was unable to provide additional information.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
16
9. FINDINGS AND OPINIONS
The subject site has a long and complex history of occupants and uses since at least the early 1960s
and possibly the late 1950s. Based on interviews, the first industrial use of the property has been
traced to a company referred to as Black Oil that developed the property for fuel blending and
storage. The original facility was reportedly dismantled by Chevron Oil Company sometime in the
late 1960s or early 1970s and rebuilt by Cowboy Oil.
Multiple tenants have occupied the subject site since the 1970s including Cowboy Oil, Morrison
Petroleum, Westec Petroleum, Jardine Petroleum, Crysen Refining, Basin Western, Genesis
Petroleum, and most recently Crown Asphalt Thermo Fluids, and Foreland Refining. Site uses
have included petroleum refining, re-refining, fuel blending, asphalt processing, used-oil recycling,
commercial fueling, as well as bulk fuel and asphalt storage.
Multiple releases have been reported at the subject site, the sources of the releases have not always
been identified, and additional source areas have been identified through historic research that pre-
date regulatory reporting. We have interviewed personnel with multiple regulatory agencies and
have found no information to suggest the subject site is under any current investigation or
remediation obligations. Discharge permits issued through South Davis Sewer District for discharges
from the remediation system and discharges from the stormwater retention pond are active and no
recent improper discharges or compliance problems were reported to us.
Multiple subsurface investigations have been conducted since the early 1990s. The most substantial
soil and groundwater source areas have consistently been encountered in the south-central property
area. The primary contaminants have been petroleum hydrocarbons, though a 1998 investigation
reported concentrations of acetone and MEK above EPA risk levels.
While major AST failures have not been reported through records review or interviews, historic
release sources include but are not limited to repeated surface spills, from loading rack areas, an oil
pit/truck wash area and associated "product diversion canal" depicted on site maps and described
through interviews. Abandoned floor drains observed in the CAPCO office/shop building also pose
a concern for past releases. Specific historic activities and waste management practices in the shop
are not known; however, these floor drains reportedly discharged to two waste oil tanks that were
removed in May 2001. Though limited soil impacts were encountered during tank removal activities,
floor drains and sumps are generally potential sources of releases.
Recent indications of existing significant subsurface impacts from historic operations include the
following:
• During the Thermo Fluids annual inspection in August 2003, Division of Solid and Hazardous
Waste personnel observed free product in a trench that was being excavated east of the Thermo
Fluids operation. Agency personnel noted that this may have been the source of free product
that has reportedly seeped into the Thermo Fluids southern secondary containment, as well as
the tar substance that had been reportedly "oozing out of the ground in the paved parking area
on hot days" in the southeast portion of the parking lot located south of the Thermo Fluids office.
• At the time of this assessment, free product was observed in an air sparge well located between
the commercial fuel dispensers and the CAPCO office building.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
17
• During quarterly monitoring rounds, free product has been reported in monitoring well B-4
located within the AST farm immediately north of the office/shop building. Results from the
quarterly sampling rounds have also consistently identified elevated concentrations of petroleum
hydrocarbons in monitoring wells B2 and B3 (located along the southern property boundary), B-9
(located in the access road between Thermo Fluids and the west property boundary), and B-15
(previously located near a former truck wash pad and oil pit). Sampling results from southern
and western perimeter wells indicate the potential for offsite migration, particularly during periods
when the cut-off trench is not operating or is operating inefficiently.
• In July 2004, Wasatch collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells: B-1, B-2, B-3, B-7,
B-9, B-14a and B-16. Free product was present in monitoring well B-4 and in the air sparge well
located between the commercial fuel islands and the office/shop building. Groundwater samples
were analyzed for VOCs, TPH-GRO, and TPH-DRO. Free product samples were submitted for
product identification analyses.
TPH-DRO was detected in the groundwater samples from monitoring wells B-2, B-3, B-7, B-9, B-
14a and B-16 at concentrations that exceed the Utah action level of 0.500 mg/L Benzene was
detected in the groundwater samples obtained from monitoring wells B-2, B-3 and B-9 that
exceed federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 5 ug/L. All other detected constituents
were reported at concentrations below current action levels.
The presence of MTBE, while below action levels, indicates the potential for a more recent
release. Also, analytical results presented in the 1991 Wasatch report identified vinyl chloride in
MW B-9 at a concentration of 140 ug/L. During the July 2004 groundwater sampling event, vinyl
chloride was detected in the groundwater sample from MW B-9 at a concentration of 1.5 ug/L,
below the federal MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) of 2.0 ug/L but further indication of the
presence of vinyl chloride in the area of MW B-9.
Free product analytical results indicate that the sample obtained from monitoring well B-4 is
comprised of gasoline range organics and unweathered diesel fuel. The product obtained from
the air sparge well appears to be comprised of 25% weathered diesel fuel.
In addition to impacts from historic operations, during our reconnaissance we observed evidence of
on-going releases including the following:
• Wastewater discharges from the Foreland operation to a depressed area adjacent east of the
stormwater retention pond exhibited a product sheen. Discolored soil and stressed vegetation in
this area indicated that these discharges had been occurring for some time.
• Staining observed in the AST farm immediately north of the CAPCO office building also
indicated recent releases.
• Soil staining below the heat transfer oil tank and distribution lines was observed in the CAPCO
emulsion plant area. Soil staining was also observed in a drum storage area north of the
Foreland operation.
At the time of this assessment, a release occurred from an underground crude oil pipeline that once
distributed product to the subject site. This recent release reportedly originated east of the subject
site, but it is not currently known who owns the crude oil line and who would be responsible for the
release. This crude line reportedly runs along the east property boundary and poses a threat for
future releases that could impact the subject site.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
18
10. CONCLUSIONS
We have conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the former Cowboy Oil facility
located at 1710 West 2600 South in Woods Cross, Utah. 8ased on the information presented in this
report, recognized environmental conditions have been identified in connection with the subject
property. Historic and recent releases have resulted in soil and groundwater impacts that are known
to be currently present on the subject site as outlined in Section 9. Free product is present on the
site, and dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon constituents have consistently been detected in the
groundwater at the site above applicable state or federal levels. The interceptor trench/air sparge
remediation system does not appear to be functioning property, increasing the potential for
groundwater impacts to be migrating offsite.
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Reviewed by:
L Boyd Breeding, P.E., P.Hg., P.G.
Certified UST Consultant
Wasatch Environmental, Inc..
19
E
i
I
W400S
Approximate
Site Location
W900IM
5
8
« Worn. SttMl Aim Lt8A« 2005,
r.dalorrM com
i
/ if
\
•J*
f— wasos
WWs— 1—T^S SSI
W1000S
VkHOOS
*>fo
W1500S
1550 S
» ** •, •' H 8-
A1750S-
,r/ W1150S
W 1950S W1900S « 1 vjl»wj 5 i< —< J» a
r B * 4 W2Q25S 68
217SS
2225S
23S0SJ W22S0S
W2425S W2350S
i
5 *
Jmu t £ 11000 W 1 1100N 106
en—"3—.
2 » (TECIR v^JS 5
?CIR IS- ^ ST COMPASS cm
68
Valvar**
HZ?]
Y g ccovtwyLE at |
W6O0N
W 5O0N 1 g Si 106
E47SN
r* imiiin Satt.La E350N
P 'A W300W
£22N E200N * ~~7 £\
r t : W1QQN J S si W 150N
5*/ r~ in f
W CENTER ST L-^i,
6fl
R ST
I
Figure 1. Former Cowboy Oil Area Map
WEI 1081-02
Figure 2. Current Site Layout Map
WFl 1081-02
Figure 3. 1998 Topographic Map, Former Cowboy Oil Property, Adapted From U. S. Geological Survey
Salt Lake City North, UT Quadrangle
WEI 1081-02
igure 4. 1963 Aerial Photograph of Former Cowboy Oil Property and Surrounding Area, Woods Cross, UT
WE11081-02
igure 5. 1973 Aerial Photograph of Former Cowboy Oil Property and Surrounding Area, Woods Cross, UT
WEI 1081-02
1983 Aerial Photograph of Former Cowboy Oil Property and Surrounding Area, Woods Cross, UT
WEI 1081-02
[APPROXIMATE SCALE (ft.)
100 40-
1
•
Si
-»
Figure 7. 1998 Aerial Photograph of Former Cowboy Oil Property and Surrounding Area, Woods Cross, UT
WEI 1081-02
TABLE 1
QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SUMMARY
COWBOY ASPHALT TERMINAL
MW B-1: Southeast corner of property
TPH-DRO TPH-GRO Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene
(.500 mg/L)» (.500 mg/L)» (5 ug/L)* (1,000 ug/L)* (700 ug/L)" (10
6/30/00
9/29/00
3/31/01
07/15/01
03/31/02
06/30/02
12/07/02
04/14/03
04/01/04"
7/12/2004"
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.67
Not Sampled
ND
Not Tested
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
0.210
0.490
ND
2.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.45
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.30
6.42
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MW B-2: South-central property line
6/30/00
9/29/00
3/31/01
07/15/01
03/31/02
06/30/02
12/07/02
04/14/03
04/01/04
7/12/2004*
Not Sampled
5.77
3.42
ND
3.10
3.45
2.16
10.20
Not Tested
6.3
ND
1.4
ND
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
0.240
0.340
3.7
185
9.77
34.6
31.4
6.0
12.2
41.0
8.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.52
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.6
ND
0.88
0.51
ND
ND
1.1
ND
MW B-3: West of Wasatch remediation shed
6/30/00
9/29/00
3/31/01
07/15/01
03/31/02
06/30/02
12/07/02
04/14/03
04/01/04
7/12/2004*
1.50
4.51
4.16
2.84
4.39
4.83
3.7©
4.17
Not Tested
8.1
ND
ND
1.5
ND
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
0.330
0.290
215 Estimated
125
364
183
217 Estimated
220
500
57.1
340
190
1.30
0.77
ND
ND
0.85
1.1
ND
2.4
1.6
ND
4.5
6.27
7.5
4.6
1.9
3.2
13
1.7
1.2
3.0
* Applicable regulatory standard
'* Laboratory Date; Sample date not given
" Samples collected by Wasatch
Additional Compounds
Analyzed for by Wasatch
Naphthalene MTBE Other
(20 ug/L)* (70 ug/L)* VOC Compounds
ND
2.1
ND
ND
Not Tested
0.64
ND
ND
ND ND ND
2.7
16.6
ND
Not Tested
0.63
ND
ND
0.62
ND 61 ND
ND
3.3
4.4
Not Tested
9.22
14
29.1
52
14 4.2 2.7
2.1
Cyclohexane
Isopropylbenzene
ND: Below laboratory detection limit
Yellow: Comcounds exceedlno •mniir»M« r**.i
TABLE 1
QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SUMMARY
COWBOY ASPHALT TERMINAL
TPH-DRO
(•500mg/L)*
TPH-GRO
(.500 many
Benzene
(5 ug/L)*
Toluene
(1,000 ug/L)*
Ethylbenzene
(700 ug/L)*
Xylene
(10,000 ug/L)*
Naphthalene
Additional Compounds
Analyzed for by Wasatch
MTBE Other
(70 ug/L)* VOC Compounds
MW B-4: AVFuel Tank Farm
6/30/00 7.31
a/29/00 Not Sampled
3/31/01 7.47
07/15/01 4.38
03/31/02 1.0
06/30/02 3.32
12/07/02 Not Sampled
04/14/03 10.4
04/01/04 Not Sampled
7/12/2004***
14.5
2.0
Not Tatted
Not Tested
438 estimated
1620
846
22.7
366
Not Tested 6480 Estimated
1.40
58
16
1.1
4.9
2.8
11.0
517
236
20.6
106
92.1
Free Product Present
MW B-7 (Wasatch B-8) Located east of current access road and east of former "product division canal"
9/29/00 ND
3/31/01 ND
07/15/01 Not Sampled
MW B-6 (Same location as B-7?)
03/31/02 0.98
06/30/02 1.1
12/07/02 ND
04/14/03 ND
MWB-7 04/01/04 Not Tested
7/12/2004*** 1.9
ND
ND
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
ND
ND
MW B-9 West central property boundary in access road
8/30/00
9/29/00
3/31/01
07/15/01
03/31/02
06/30/02
12/07/02
04/14/03
04/01/04
7/12/2004*
5.03
7.10
3.62
3.40
0.97
1.8
3.2
4.28
Not Tested
3.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
0.0076
ND
0.67
1.8
0.45
0.62
ND
ND
0.40
ND
8.34
11.0
4.5
8.09
I. 20
4.0
5.72
II. 4
1.2
7.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.68
ND
ND
1.80
2.6
ND
0.64
ND
0.87
ND
0.6
ND
ND
ND
0.81
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.10
2.8
1.1
0.45
ND
ND
0.55
1.1
ND
ND
18.30
738
399
2.8
325
185.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.480
0.62
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11.1
157
78
Not Tested
46.5
22.9
ND
32.9
Not Tested
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.6
12.0
ND
Not Tested
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
11 1.5 Vinyl Chloride
(MCL: 2 ug/L)
' Applicable regulatory standard
* Laboratory Date; Sample date not given
* Samples collected by Wasatch ND: Below laboratory detection limit
TABLE 1
QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA SUMMARY
COWBOY ASPHALT TERMINAL
TPH-DRO
(.500 mg/L)*
TPH-GRO
(.500 mg/L)*
Benzene
(5 ug/L)*
Toluene
(1,000 ug/L)*
Ethylbenzene
(700 ug/L)*
Xylene
(10,000 ug/L)*
Naphthalene
(20 ug/L)*
Additional Compounds
Analyzed for by Wasatch
MTBE Other
(70 ug/L)* VOC Compounds
MWB-14 Southwest corner of property
6/30700 1.80 ND
9/29/00 ND ND
3/31/01 Not Sampled
07/15/01 Not Sampled
03/31/02 Not Sampled
06730/02 ND Not Tested
12/07/02 ND Not Tested
04/14/03 ND Not Tested
04/01/04 Not Tested 0.064
MW B-14a Southwest corner of property
7/12/2004*** 1.3 ND
8.01
0.86
ND
1.6
8.14
9.4
ND
MWB-15: Replaced Wasatch B-5 near former truck wash/oil pit
6/30/00 7.14 ND 9.26
9/29/00 7.72 ND 2.7
3/31/01 7.38 ND 3.4
07/15/01 3.08 ND 4.8
MW B-16: Replaced Wasatch B-6. Located east of the Pour Building
MW-18?
MW-B16
6/30/00
9/29/00
3/31/01
07/16701
03/31/02
06/30/02
12/07/02
04/14/03
04/01/04
7/12/2004***
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
ND
ND
Not Tested
0.63
ND
ND
ND
ND
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
Not Tested
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' Applicable regulatory standard
' Laboratory Date; Sample date not given
' Samples collected by Wasatch
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.23
ND
4.50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.3
ND
1.10
0.75
0.78
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.33
ND
5.10
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.52
ND
350
0.76
1.7
0.67
ND
ND
ND
ND
Not Tested
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND: Below laboratory detection limit
Yellow: Comoounda mtmartinn «»W»K»>«I»I» ••—••
APPENDIX A
Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Information
Wasatch Environmental. Inc.
»5* JoK* Asm Jrraa; J»T*? 2/< MoVife ITT W47 U]*2SS-2(3( >7K
To: MiK£ftAfcP£Tl From: 9<VT SAAHU,
Fax: ^^-^g^ Pages: j5_
Phone: - ^3^-1 Date: ?otOc \0>;z^ote
Re; QTftJLlj . MO/J<r^A)^ o£ CC: CHg\3 iMoi^
Comments:
P>t^Ai^. LasxL *TU,S /AJ PHePA&AT/iXQ C&£- 7V<5
Xl>\}& Z-«-> &A*x£UfJ<a. XT rfj M6%T jfiAPeXTTA/OT- THAT YOU
Of*" TW^ A^CMT-^ ALSO, 5ijA& TO L&c#rg fi^jQ ct£A*J Oor
A<ju rt4£ tM&LJLS To -r*<£ tX> t± , pe€<- F&ZrZ. TO
• J'toiw.' SQ1-2SS-2626 Fax: SQl-255-i266 [e-mail]
STATUS MEMORANDUM
To: Chris Hadley
CC: Dare McSwain: Mike Barret
From: Patrick T. Smith
RE: Cowboy Asphalt Terminal (CAT) - Monitoring Well Sampling Procedures
Date: June 5,2000
This memo is intended for the benefit of the CAT employees) who 'will be perfecting
the routine maintenance and sample collection of the she groundwater monitoring wells.
It is meant to be used as an initial, quick reference guide to the quarterly sampling of the
groundwater monitoring wells located at the CAT. As stated in the RMC/Crown Energy
contract dated March 2,2000, a detailed Sample and Analysis Plan will be provided to
CAT personnel incorporating the information contained in this memo.
On June 20,2000, KMC will assist CAT personnel (Chris Hadley and Mike Barrett) with
the quarterly sampling. Prior to that date, please purchase the necessary sample
equipment and open an account with an analytical laboratory. A list of sample equipment
and suggested analytical laboratories is provided at the end of this memo. In addition to
acquiring the equipment and laboratory, all wells should be located and prepared for
sampling as discussed during the May site visit
Monitoring wells to sample include:
[Refer to Figure 1 for locations on map
• B-1 - Off site, located on the east aide of the pumping stations, near the road (2600
South)
• B-2 - Offsite, located on the west side of the pumping stations, near the road (2600
South)
• B-3 - Located just a few feet west of the ahed for the pump and treat system.
• B-4 - Located inside the benn surrounding tank 77?, on the west side of the tank.
Near the tank farm
• B-5 - Located just south of the truck wash gump. The sump has been removed, and
well B-5 has been abandoned, The replacement for this well (B-15) is located
approximately 20' southwest of where B-5 was located. B-15 can be found
approximately 5' south of the truck pad.
• B-6 was located near the northeast corner of the asphalt pour building. Because this
well fell within the footprint of the pour building, the well was abandoned and
replaced with well B-16. Well B-16 is located at approximately half the distance
(north-south) of the pour building, and approximately 10 feet from the building and 5
feet from the road. It is directly west of the tank toadingAixuoading station.
• B-7 - Located north of well B-15, adjacent (-20' east) to the access road
• B-8 - Located at the northeast corner of the site, this '"'eil seems to have been covered
some time ago, and has not been located nor sampled by KMC.
• B-9 - Located in the center of the paved access road, directly west of tbt
ThermoFluids parking Jot.
• B-10 - Located in line with (heading north) of wells B-5 and B-7 (~ 200')
• B-11 - Also appears to have been buried. RMC has neither located nor sampled this
well.
• B-12 - Located on the eastern side of the access road at the northwest corner of the
site. Due to silting/debris/damage, this well was abandoned and replaced with well
B-17. B-17 is located approximately 10' south of B-12.
• B-14 - Uxated offaite, just south of the main gate. It is placed in a concrete pad
approximately 8' x 5', This is the western well of 2. (vs. B-14A)
• B-14A - Located offshe, just south of the main gate. It is placed in a concrete pad
approximately 8' x 5'. This is the eastern well of 2 (vs. B-14).
• B-15 - Located just south of the concrete truck wash pad in the south-central part of
the site. Replacement for well B-5.
• B-16 - Located east of the asphalt pour building and west of the access road.
Adjacent to the loading/urdoading station.
• B-17 - Located at the northwest corner of the she on the eastern edge of the access
road. Near tank #215. This is the replacement well for B-12.
Condition of groundwater monitoring wells as of May, 2000:
As stated in the contract dated March 2,2000, RMC completed an initial site visit with
Chris Hadley and Mike Barrett During the visit, each well she was visited to observe the
condition of the wells and determine whether samples could be collected for the second
quarter of2000. The following observations were made:
• Well B-1 was sealed and intact. Should be cleaned prior to sampling.
• Well B-2 was covered with several inches of dirt/debris. The sealing cap could not be
observed, but it appeared to be in place. This well must be cleaned prior to sampling,
and the flush-mount cover should be replaced.
• Well B-3 is intact, but should be cleaned prior to sampling.
• Well B~4 is buried under several inches of soil/debris. The well was located, but the
dirt/debris must be cleared away and the well should be cleaned prior to sampling
• Well B-6 was located, but is buried under several inches of dirt/gravel. This area
should be cleared of excess dirt/gravel to avoid covering the well again. The well
will need to be cleaned prior to «mpKng
• Well B-9 was observed in good condition and still sealed. In the past, surface water
often collected in this well, so it should still be inspected and cleaned out prior to
sampling.
• Well B-10 was not locked during the site visit The well may have been covered
during construction activities. If possible, this well should be located and cleaned. If
it cannot be located, a new well should be installed, as this is a key, upgradient
location for the CAT site.
« Wells B-14 and B-14A were both observed to be intact, however the flush mount
covers were not in place. The covers must be located or replaced. The well caps
'were covered with several inches of debris/mud thai will need to be cleared away
prior to sampling.
• Well B-15 was located and is intact The well head is still above ground and should
not need cleaning, however, ft does need to be prominently marked and protected
from future damage.
• Well B-16 was not located. It has been covered by asphalt on the east side of the
pour building: The well has a metal flush mount cover, so it should be locatable with
a metal detector.
• Weil B-17 was not located The site has been covered by road construction at the
northwest comer of the she. This well is also in a key, upgradient location for the
CAT site and should be located for sampling.
Procedures:
Monthly:
Check conditions of the monitoring wells and collect water depth data.
Quarterly:
Sample all monitoring wells.
1. Routinely check each wells7 condition. Occasionally, the well covers have been
found missing or removed. The wells are also prone to being covered up with
dirt/debris from trucks, excavations, maintenance, etc. Periodically checking the
condition of the morritoring wells will ensure that they will be in good shape for
sampling.
2. Prior to sampling each well, measure the total water depth of each well, and any
significant product that may be on the surface. Keep a running bg of each wells'
depth over time. This should be performed on a monthly basis, with sampling
performed on a quarterly basis.
3. Log any peculiar characteristics of the monitoring wells when they are opened for
sampling. Note any water standing above the well, any peculiar odor or substance
observed when the well is opened. Keep a running log of this information.
4. Prior to sampling any well, purge the well of approximately 3 times the total volume
of water present in that well Pump the purge water into a temporary container, then
transfer that water into the treatment system located to the east of the maintenance
building. Once the well has been purged, allow it to recover and remove a sample
with a disposable bailer or other approved sampling device.
5. Collect a total of four separate samples from each well. Mountain States Analytical
(MSAJ), or any other approved lab, will provide 4 sample vials for each well Insert
the drain plug in the bottom of the disposable bailer, and allow the water to pour into
each sample vial. Then pour water into the vial cap, also. When placing the cap back
onto the vial quickly pour the water from the cap into the vial so that when sealed,
there are no visible sir bubbles in the sample vial. Air bubbles will adversely affect
the lab analysis. Mark the sample vials appropriately and place them into a cooler
with blue ice. Keep samples in the cooler until they are delivered to MSAI or another
approved lab.
6. Fill out the chain of custody (COC) appropriately and deliver the completed samples
and COC to the lab for analysis. Keep one copy of the COC for your records The
laboratory will return the other copy to you upon completion of the analysis.
Sample Equipment Needed:
• Disposable well bailers (2" diameter)
• Retrieval line. Any heavy duty string will do.
• Container for wastewater (25 or 55 gallon drum works well)
• Water pump and hose
• Sample Cooler and Ice (should be supplied by laboratory)
• Sample gloves (laboratory supplied)
• Sample containers (laboratory supplied)
« Chain of Custody Forms and Custody Tape (laboratory supplied)
• Pens (ball-point and felt-tip)
• Sampling logbook (should be bound and waterproof with hardcover)
• Measuring device (for determining water depth)
• Socket wrench and a large, flat head screwdriver
• Disposable rags/sponges
• Well cap key (supplied with caps)
Suggested supply retailers: Suggested analytical laboratories:
American Eagle American West Analytical
840 West 1700 South 463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake Chy.UT 84104
973-2555
Salt Lake City, UT
263-8686
Industrial Supply
1635 South 300 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
484-8644
Mountain States Analytical
1645 West 2200 South
Salt Lake City Utah
973-0050
<- • O- 3
Cowboy Monitoring Wells
4 rffCC
0 A
I TANK )
fTQCKPUD
son. MODEM* TANK)
^TANK^ ^TANK) ( TANK)
STDM*WrW
YAtK
M3
TANKS
oooo KJ POUR lUILDMa OOOO
oooooo
^ANK)
•
TANK K.1
TANKS a HI
K n
UST
THERMO HAWW d • K3» oo
OO
TANK ] »•«
•TWAOE
AREA OO OO •»
l«4
as —i #y
BB9 "sss
APPENDIX B
Government Database Records Report
Wasatch Environmental. Inc.
EDR Environmental
Data Resources Inc
The EDR Radius Map™
Report
Cowboy Oil
1710 West 2600 South
Woods Cross, UT 84087
Inquiry Number: 01222662.1r
June 30,2004
The Standard in
Environmental Risk
Management Information
440 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, Connecticut 06460
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.edrnet.com
DETAIL MAP - 01222662.1r - Wasatch Environmental; Inc.
9
wsoo wtas
l/4MMe> Target Property
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A Coal Gasification Sites
i Sensitive Receptors
[~ ' j National Priority List Sites
Q landfill Sites
[ , "! Dept. Defense Sites
pTl Indian Reservations BIA
/S/ Oil & Gas pipelines
Federal Wetlands
1
FN
TARGET PROPERTY; Cowboy Oil CUSTOMER: Wasatch Environmental, Inc.
ADDRESS: 1710 West 2600 South CONTACT: Juile Kilgore
CITY/STATE/ZIP: Woods Cross UT 84087 INQUIRY #: 01222662.1r
LAT/LONG: 40.8617/111.9272 DATE: June 30,2004 6:49 pm
OVERVIEW MAP - 01222662.1 r - Wasatch Environmental, Inc.
^
St
r t J t •
3f
a
TV
1 Win Target Property
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
* Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
i. Coal Gasification Sites
• ~ -1 National Priority List Sites
Landfill Sites
~ : j Dept. Defense Sites
{•' '. '\ Indian Reservations BIA
A/ Oil & Gas pipelines
Federal Wetlands to
TARGET PROPERTY:
ADDRESS:
CITY/STATE/ZIP:
LAT/LONG:
Cowboy Oil
1710 West 2600 South
Woods Cross UT 84087
40.8617/111.9272
CUSTOMER: Wasatch Environmental, Inc.
CONTACT: Juile Wlgore
INQUIRY #: 01222662.1r
DATE: June 30,2004 6:48 pm
Comrtani O 20M EDR Inc O 2003 GOT inc fUL 07/2003 AD Monti Aaufvul
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Target Distance
Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2-1 > 1
Total
Plotted
FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD
NPL
Proposed NPL
CERCLIS
CERC-NFRAP
CORRACTS
RCRIS-TSD
RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen.
RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen.
ERNS
1.000
1.000
0.500
0.250
1.000
0.500
0.250
0.250
TP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NR
0
0
0
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
2
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
STATE ASTM STANDARD
State Haz. Waste
State Landfill
LUST
UST
VCP
INDIAN UST
INDIAN LUST
X
X
N/A
0.500
0.500
0.250
0.500
0.250
0.500
N/A
0
0
1
0
0
0
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
2
NR
0
NR
0
N/A
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
N/A
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
N/A
0
2
1
0
0
0
FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL
CONSENT
ROD
Delisted NPL
FINDS
HMIRS
MLTS
MINES
NPL Liens
PADS
DOD
US BROWNFIELDS
FUDS
UMTRA
INDIAN RESERV
RAATS
TRIS
TSCA
SSTS
FTTS
X
X
1.000
1.000
1.000
TP
TP
TP
0.250
TP
TP
1.000
0.500
1.000
0.500
1.000
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
0
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL
AST
SPILLS
TP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
TC01222662.1r Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Database
Search
Target Distance
Property (Miles) <1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 >1
Total
Plotted
EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES
Coal Gas 1.000
BROWNFIELDS DATABASES
US BROWNFIELDS
VCP
BROWNFIELDS
0.500
0.500
0.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
N/A = This State does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list.
TC01222662.1r Page 5
Map ID
Olrectio'.
Dlstanci
Distance (ft.)
Elevation Site
%AP*INDINGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
Coal Gas Site Search: No arte was found In a search of Real Property Scan's ENVIROHAZ database.
A1 WOODS CROSS PLANT TSCA 1007089993
Target 1710 WEST 2600 SOUTH N/A
Property WOODS CROSS, UT 54087
Site 1 of 9 In cluster A
Actual:
4239 ft.
A2 THERMO FLUIDS INC.
Target 1710 WEST 2600 SOUTH
Property WOODS, UT 84087
Actual:
4239 ft.
RCRIS-SQG 1004788853
UTR0000007B6
Site 2 of 9 In cluster A
RCRIS:
Owner
EPA ID:
Contact
THERMO FLUIDS INC.
[phone]
UTR000000786
BRIAN BARNARD
[phone]
Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
TSDF Activities: Not reported
Violation Status: Violations exist
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Penalty Summary:
Penalty Description
Pinal SEP Credit
R315-15-12.1(a)
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
09/13/2002
Not reported
Cond. 22 & 10 of permit
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
09/13/2002
Not reported
R315-15-4.6
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
12/01/2000
06/07/2002
Penalty Date
3/6/2003
Penalty Amount
4800
Lead Agency
STATE
There are 3 violation record(s) reported at this site:
Evaluation . . . Area of Violation
Date of
Compliance
TC012226C2.1r Page 6
Mao ID
Directic^
Distant*
Oistance (ft.)
Elevation Site
WAP'FINDfNGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
A3 COWBOY OIL
Target 1710 W 2600 S
Property WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
LUST U00379O448
UST N/A
Actual:
4239 ft.
Site 3 of 9 In cluster A
LUST:
Facility ID: 3000342
Closed Date: 10/09/2003
Project Manager Hillary Mason
Owner CROWN ASPHALT PRODUCTS CO.
Owner Address: 2336 EAST BEHREND DR.
PHOENIX. AZ 85024
Leak ID:
Notification Date:
UX
05/25/2001
UST:
Facility ID:
Total Tanks:
Closed Tanks:
Owner
Owner Address:
Owner Phone:
3000342
2
2
CROWN ASPHALT PRODUCTS CO.
PHOENIX, A2 85024
[phone]
A4 COWBOY OIL
Target 1710 W 2800 S
Property WOODS CROSS, UT
A100228264
N/A
Actual:
4239 ft
Site 4 of 9 In duster A
AST:
Facility Id:
Owner Name :
Tank Id:
Tank Status:
Tank Capacity:
Substance Stored :
3000342
CROWN ASPHALT PRODUCTS CO.
2.. ..
(^"Permanently Out of Use
Not Listed
A5 CROWN ASPHALT PRODS. CO. COWBOY ASPHALT TERMINAL TRIS 1005451718
Target 1710 W. 2600 S. 84087CRWNS17
Property WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
Site 5 of 9 In cluster A
Actual:
4239 ft
A6 CROWN ASPHALT PRODUCT COMPANY RCRIS-SQG 1000362891
Target 1710 WEST 2600 SOUTH FINDS UTD063305544
Property WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
Site 6 of 9 In cluster A
Actual:
4239 ft
TC01222662.1r Page 7
Map ID
Direction
Distanct
Distance (ft)
Elevation Site
MAP FINDINGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
VCRC-WN ASPHALT PRODUCT COMPANY (Continued) 1000362891
RCRIS
Owner
EPA ID:
Contact:
COWBOY ASPHALT TERMINAL LLC
[phone]
UTD063305544
MIKE BARRETT
[phone]
Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
TSDF Activities: Not reported..
violation StataSTVlolations exist
Regulation Violated!
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
There are 1 violation record(s) reported at this site:
Evaluation Area of Violation
Not reported
GENERAJORALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
03/12/1966
03/26/1986 /
Date of
Compliance
FINDS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Aerometric Information Retrieval System/AIRS Facility Subsystem
National Emissions Inventory
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system
Toxics Release Inventory
Utah Common Identifier Mechanism
A7 , GENESIS PEJROLEOM RECYCLING RCRIS-SQG 1001081686
Target -tritrWEST 2600 SOUTH FINDS UTR000000695
Property WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
Actual:
4239 ft
Site 7 of 9 In duster A
RCRIS:
Owner
EPA ID:
Contact
CRYSEN REFINING INC.
[phone]
UTR000000695
SHANE SMOOT
[phone]
Classification: Small Quantity Generator
TSDF Activities: Not reported
Violation Status: VlertatJona exist _ ^ • ^ ... —•
Regulation Violated':*
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
r315-3.(a)
GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
03//TU/1 995 \
999 y 06/10/1999
r315-*-2(b)
GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
03/10/1999
06/10/1999
r315-*-2(a)
GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
03/10/1999
06/10/1999
TC01222662.1r Page 8
Mat' ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.)
Elevation Site
MAP FINDINGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
GENESIS PETROLEUM RECYCLING (Continued) 1001081686
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Penalty Summary:
Penalty Description
. Final Monetary Penalty •-•
V. Final Monetary Penalty -
K315-5
GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
07/30/1998
02/24/1999
Penalty Date
(' 8/30/1999 j
Penalty Amount
21200
21200
Lead Agency
STATE
STATE
There are 4 violation record(s) reported at this site:
Evaluation Area of Violation
Date of
Compliance
FINDS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Aerometric Information Retrieval System/A!RS Facility Subsystem
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system
Utah Common Identifier Mechanism
A8 ( AVFUEL CORP. ^
Target .1710 W 2600 S__--
Property WOODS-CROSS, UT
AST JA100208464
N/A
Actual:
4239 ft
Site 8 of 9 In cluster A
AST:
Facility Id:
Owner Name :
Tank Id:
Tank Status :
Tank Capacity:
Substance Stored :
Fadltty Id:
Owner Name :
Tank Id:
Tank Status:
Tank Capacity:
Substance Stored:
3000494
AVFUEL CORPORATION
1 ; ^
Currently In Use^
^30000
Av Gas
3000494
AVFUEL CORPORATION
2
Currently In Use
33600
Av Gas
'J ,\l - •
r • f
•v i -1 • J
,•1 z
A9 NEILS USED TRUCK 1 CAR SALES RCRIS-SQG 1000472430
SSE 695 WEST 1100 SOUTH FINDS UTD988069944
< 1/8 N SALT LAKE, UT 64054
65 ft
Site 9 of 9 In cluster A
Relative:
Equal
Actual:
4239 ft
TC01222662.1r Page 9
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft)
Elevation Site
•MAR FINDINGS
Database(sj
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
NEILS USED TRUCK ft. CAR SALES (Continued) 1000472430
RCRIS:
Owner
EPA ID:
Contact:
NEIL R. SCHOENENBERGER
[phone]
UTD988069944
HAROLD CALL
[phone]
Classification: Small Quantity Generator
TSDF Activities: Not reported
Violation Status: No violations found
10
ENE
<1/8
190 ft
Relative:
Equal
Actual:
4239 ft.
FINDS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system
NEIL'S AUTO TRANSPORT
695 W 1100 N PO BOX 540279
NORTH SALT LAKE, UT 84054
UST U001447754
N/A
UST:
Facility ID:
Total Tanks:
Closed Tanks:
Owner
Owner Address:
3000393
1
0
NEILS AUTO TRANSPORT
NORTH SALT LAKE. UT 84054
Owner Phone: [phone]
East
1/8-1/4
949 fL
FORELAND TRANSPORTATION
2561 SOUTH 1560 WEST #200,
WOODS CROSS, UT
Relative:
Equal
Actual:
4239 ft
RCRIS-SQG 1004789135
FINDS UTR000006569
RCRIS:
Owner ENERGY INCOME FUND
[phone]
EPA ID: UTR0O0006569
Contact PETER IPSON
[phone]
Classification: Small Quantity Generator
TSDF Activities: Not reported ^
violation Status: Violations exist
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Not reported
TRANSPQRTER-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
' 09/17/2001""
09/17/2001
There are 1 violation record(s) reported at this site:
Evaluation Area of Violation
Date of
Compliance
TC01222662.1r Page 10
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft)
Elevation Site
. MAP'FiNBINGS
Databasefs)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
FORELAND TRANSPORTATION (Continued)
FINDS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system
1004789135
12
South
1M-1/2
1482 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
4240 ft.
ALBERTSON DISTRIBUTION CENTER
620 WEST 600 NORTH
N SALT LAKE, UT 84054
RCRIS:
Owner.
EPA ID:
Contact:
ALBERTSONS
[phone]
UTD035347921
ED LARKINS
[phone]
Classification: SmaH Quantity Generator
TSDF Activities: Not reported
Violation Status: No violations found
RCRIS-SQG 1000219727
FINDS UTD03S347921
LUST
UST
FINDS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system
Utah Cornmon Identifier Mechanism
LUST:
Facility ID: 3000371
Closed Date: 04/22/1994
Project Manager [Robin Jenkins]
Owner ALBERTSONS INC
Owner Address: 620 W 600 N
NORTH SALT LAKE, UT 84054
Leak ID: GQO
Notification Date: 02/27/1991
UST:
Facility ID:
Total Tanks:
Closed Tanks:
Owner
Owner Address:
Owner Phone:
3000371
7
7
ALBERTSONS INC
NORTH SALT LAKE, UT 84054
Not reported
13
SSW
1/4-1/2
1677 ft.
Relative:
Equal
Actual:
4239 ft.
HERM HUGHES & SONS INC.
900 N REDWOOD RD
NORTH SALT LAKE, UT 84054
LUST:
Facility ID: 3000081
Closed Date: 09/24/1996
Project Manager Hilary Maaon
Owner HUGHES & HUGHES INVESTMENT CORP
Owner Address: 900 N REDWOOD RD
NORTH SALT LAKE, UT 84054
LUST U000812800
UST N/A
ID:
Notification Date:
HZI
01/26/1993
TC01222662.1r Page 11
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft)
Elevation Site
: MAPFINBINGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
HERM HUGHES & SONS INC. (Continued) U000812800
UST:
Facility ID:
Total Tanks:
Closed Tanks:
Owner:
Owner Address:
Owner Phone:
3000081
3
3
HUGHES & HUGHES INVESTMENT CORP
NORTH SALT LAKE, UT 84054
[phone]
14
ENE
1/2-1
4407 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
4275 ft
CRYSEN REFINING
2355 S1100 W
WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
CORRACTS Data:
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date: -
Corrective Action:
2002 NAICS Title:
FINDS 1000379837
LUST 84087CRYSN23
RCRIS-LQG
TRIS
UST
CORRACTS
UTD063314975
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
09/1671996
CA070YE - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Necessary
Petroleum Refineries
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action:
2002 NAICS Title:
UTD063314975
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
09/04/1997
CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a tow corrective
action priority
Petroleum Refineries
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action:
2002 NAICS Title:
UTD063314975
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
09/16/1997
CA725YE - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Yes, Current Human Exposures
Under Control has been verified
Petroleum Refineries
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action:
2002 NAICS Title:
UTD063314975
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
09/16/1997
CA750YE • Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration of
Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified
Petroleum Refineries
RCRIS Corrective Action Summary:
Event Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human Exposures Under
Control has been verified. Based on a review of Information contained In the
El determination, current human exposures are expected to be under control
at the faculty under current and reasonably expected conditions. This
determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of
sign/Scant changes at the facility.
Event Date: 09/1671997
TC01222662.1r Page 12
Msr. iD
Directio'i
Distanct
Distance (ft)
Etevatton Site
:MAP*FINDfNSS
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
CRYSEN REFINING (Continued) 1000379837
Event
Event Date:
Event
Event Date:
Event:
Event Date:
(oration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration of
Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a review
of Information contained In the El extermination, It has been determined
that migration of contaminated groundwater Is under control at the facility.
Specifically, this determination indicates that the migration of
contaminated groundwater is under control, and that rnonftorlng will be
conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater remains within the
existing area of contaminated groundwater. This Determination will be
reevaluated when the Agency becomes aware of significant changes at the
facility.
09/1671997
CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a low corrective action
priority.
09/04/1997
RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Necessary;
09/16/1996
RCRIS:
Owner:
EPA ID:
Contact
SILVER EAGLE REFINING-WOODS CROSS
[phone]
UTD063314975
MIKE ASTIN
[phone]
Classification: Large Quantity Generator
TSDF Activities: Not reported
BIENNIAL REPORTS:
Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2001
Waste
K171
Quantity (Lbsl
9150.00
Violation Status: Violations exist
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated :
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Not reported
GENERATORS! REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
03/12/1986
04/07/1986
Not reported
GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
09/13/1985
05/13/1986
Not reported
GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
03/01/1985
04/30/1985
There are 3 violation record(s) reported at this site:
Evaluation Area of Violation
Date of
Compliance
TC01222662.1r Page 13
Map ID
Director.
Distance
Distance (ft.;
Elevation Site
J^FIWJINGS.
Database(s)
EDR ID Numbe-
EPA ID Number
CRYSEN REFINING (Continued) 1000379837
FINDS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Aefometnc Information Retrieval System/AIRS Facility Subsystem
Integrated Compliance Information
National Emissions Inventory
National Emissions Trends
National Toxics Inventory
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system
Toxics Release Inventory
Utah Common Identifier Mechanism
LUST:
FacKttylD: 3000044 Leak ID: FVW
Closed Date: 07/29/199B Notification Date: 06/22/1990
Project Manager Hillary Mason
Owner CRYSEN REFINING INC
Owner Address: 2355 S 1100 W
WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
UST:
Facility ID: 3000044
Total Tanks: 1
Closed Tanks: 1
Owner. CRYSEN REFINING INC
Owner Address: WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
Owner Phone: [phone]
15
NNE
1/2-1
5167 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
4242 ft.
GOLDEN EAGLE OIL REF INC
1474 W 1500 S
WOODS CROSS, UT 84087
CERCLIS-NFRAP Classification Data:
Site Incident Categorflot reported
1000166882
UTD070534623
FINDS
RCRIS-LQG
RCRIS-TSD
CORRACTS
CERC-NFRAP
Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility
Non NPL Code: DR
Ownership Status: Other NPL Status: Not on the NPL
Site Description: HAZ MATERIALS STORED: TOLUENE, METHANOL. ACETONE, PAINT THINNER,
TRICHLOROETHANE & METHYLCHLORIDE. BEGAN ON UNKNOWN DATE AS REFINERY
FOR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS. IN '80, SITE BECAME A STORAGE FACILITY FOR
SPENT OIL & ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS.
CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History:
Assessment DISCOVERY Completed: 08/01/1980
Assessment: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Completed: 05/06/1987
Assessment PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Completed: 07/23/1992
Assessment ARCHIVE SITE Completed: 10/10/1996
CORRACTS Data:
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action:
UTD070534623
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
09/16/1996
CA225NR • Stabilization Measures Evaluation, This facility Is , not amenable to
stabilization activity at the, present time for reasons other than (1) K
appears to be technically, Infeaslble or inappropriate (NF) or (2) there is a
lack of technical, information (IN). Reasons for this conclusion may be the
status of, closure at the facility, the degree of risk, timing considerations,
the status of corrective action work at the facility, or other, administrative
considerations
TC01222662.1r Page 14
Mac iD
Direction
Dtstanct-
Distance (ft.)
Elevation Site
MAP FINDINGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA 10 Number
GOLDEN EAGLE OIL REF INC (Continued)
2002 NAICS Title: Petroleum Refineries
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing
1000186882
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action;
2002 NAICS TltJe:
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action:
2002 NAICS Title:
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action:
2002 NAICS Title:
EPA Id:
Region:
Area Name:
Actual Date:
Corrective Action:
2002 NAICS Title:
UTD070534623
6
ENTIRE FACILITY
07/13/1992
CA050 - RFA Completed
Petroleum Refineries
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing
UTD070534623
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
09/1671996
CA070NO - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI. RFI Is Not Necessary
Petroleum Refineries
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing
UTD070534623
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
07/13/1992
CA075HI - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a high corrective
action priority
Petroleum Refineries
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing
UTD070534623
8
ENTIRE FACILITY
09/16/1996
CA725IN - Current Human Exposures Under Control, More information Is needed to
make a determination
Petroleum Refineries
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing
riirk thi« hypgriinif while viewing on your computer to access
3 additional CORRACTS record(s) in the EDR Site Report.
RCRIS Corrective Action Summary:
Event RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Not Necessary:
Event Date: 09/16/1996
Event CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a medium corrective action
priority.
Event Date: 09/16/1996
Event Stabilization Measures Evaluatlon.This facility Is not amenable to
stabilization activity at the present time for reasons other than 1) It
appears to be technically Infeasible or Inappropriate (NF) or 2) there is a
lack of technical Information (IN). Reasons for this conclusion may be the
status of closure at the facility, the degree of risk, timing
considerations, the status of corrective action work at the facility, or
other administrative considerations.
Event Date: 09/1671996
TC01222662.1r Page 15
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.)
Elevation Site
rMAP PlNDIf'iGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
GOLDEN EAGLE OIL REP INC (Continued) 1000156B82
Event
Event Date:
Event
Event Date:
Event
Event Date:
Event-
Event Date:
Event
Event Date:
Current Human Exposures under Control, More information is needed to make a
determination.
09/1671996
Corrective Action Process Terminated, No Further Action
09/16/1996
I oration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, More Information Is
needed to make a determination.
09/16/1996
RFA Completed
07/13/1992
CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a high corrective action
priority.
07/13/1992
RCRIS:
Owner
EPA ID:
DAVE, DON & LORRAINE TIMOTHY
[phone]
UTD070534623
Contact CHUCK STEWARDS
[phone]
Classification: Large Quantity Generator, TSDF
TSDF Activities: Used oil spec marketer
Violation Status: Violations exist
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
R315-15-5.9
TRANSPORTER-OTHER REQUIREMENTS
12/10/2002
Not reported
r315-15-5.8(a)(2)(l)
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
08/24/2000
Not reported
R315-15-5.6
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
08/24/2000
Not reported
R315-15-1.1(|)
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
08/24/2000
Not reported
r315-15-5.6
GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
08/24/2000
Not reported
R315-15-5.8(b)
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
08/24/2000
Not reported
R315-15-5.9
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
08/24/2000
TC01222662.1r Page 16
Mar ID
Direction
Distance
Distance (ft.)
Elevation Site
"MAP FINDINGS
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
GOLDEN EAGLE OIL REF INC (Continued)
Actual Date Achieved Compliance-
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compllance:
Regulatlon Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated :
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
1000186882
Not reported
R315-15-5.7
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
06724/2000
Not reported
R315-15-7.5
GENERATOR/MARKETER BURNER/BLENDER
08/24/2000
Not reported
R315
GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
01/23/1992
04/20/1992
Not reported
TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS
11/10/1988
12/0671989
Not reported
TSD-PREPAREDNESS/PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS
11/10/1988
12/08/1989
Not reported
GENERATOR-MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS
11/10/1988
12/08/1989
Not reported
GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
11/10/1988
12/08/1989
Not reported
T5D-CONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS
11/10/1988
12/08/1989
Not reported
TSD-FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
10/20/1988
12/08/1989
Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
10/20/1988
12/08/1989
Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
10/20/1988
12/08/1989
Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
10/20/1986
12/08/1989
Not reported
TSO-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
TC01222662.1r Page 17
Map ID
Director
Distant*
Distance (fi)
Etevatior, Site
-MAP FINDINGS
Oatabase(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
GOLDEN EAGLE OIL REF INC (Continued)
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined -
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Regulation Violated:
Area of Violation:
Date Violation Determined:
Actual Date Achieved Compliance:
Penalty Summary:
Penalty Description
1000186882
03/04/1986
06/08/1989
Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
03/04/1988
06706/1989
Not reported
TSD-F1NANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
02/09/1988
06/06/1989
Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
05/21/1986
06/0671989
Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
05/21/1986
06/06/1989
-Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
05/21/1986
06/0671989
Not reported
TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
05/21/1986
06/06/1989
Penalty Date
Final SEP Credit 7/22/2003
Penalty Amount
35500
Lead Agency
STATE
There are 26 violation record(s) reported at this site:
Evaluation Area of Violation
FINDS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Aerometric Information Retrieval System/AIRS Facility Subsystem
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system
Utah Common Identifier Mechanism
Date of
Compliance
TC01222662.1r Page 18
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EORID Site Name Slla Address Zip Database^)
NORTH SALT LAKE CITY 1000237493 KOCH PERFORMANCE ASPHALT CO. 95 W EST 1100 NORTH 84054 RCRIS-SQG, FINDS
NORTH SALT LAKE CITY 1003877892 MINERAL FERTILIZER 350 REDWOOD ROAD 84054 CERC-NFRAP
GOVERNMEMT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement
of the ASTM standard.
FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS
NPL: National Priority List
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL Is a subset of CERCLIS and Identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 05/04/04
Date Made Active at EDR; 05/21/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 17
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact 05/04/04
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-655^6659
EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Pnority List Sites
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Date of Government Version: 04/27/04
Date Made Active at EDR: 05/21/04
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 05/04/04
Elapsed ASTM days: 17
Date of Last EDR Contact 05/04/04
CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
CERCUS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,
private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List (NPL) and sites which are In the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL
Date of Government Version: 02/26/04
Date Made Active at EDR: 04/02/04
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/22/04
Elapsed ASTM days: 11
Date of Last EDR Contact 03/22/04
CERCUS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-413^)223
As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated 'No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed
from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an Initial investigation, no contamination was found,
contamination was removed quicicry without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination
was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately
25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them
as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the Investigations In the future. This policy change is
part of the EPA's Brownflelds Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens
to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites.
TC01222662.1r Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 02/26/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/22/04
Date Made Active at EDR: 04/02/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 11
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 03/22/04
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/15AM Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/25/04
Date Made Active at EDR: 04/15/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 21
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact 03/08/04
RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS Includes selective Information on sites which generate,
transport store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs): generate less than 100 kg of hazardous
waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs): generate between
100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs): generate over 1,000 kilograms
(kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Transporters are individuals or
entities that move hazardous waste from the generator off-site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or
dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 04/13/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 04/20/04
Date Made Active at EDR: 05/13/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 23
Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact 04/20/04
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/03 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/26704
Date Made Active at EDR: 03/12/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 46
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact 04/26/04
FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
The Biennial Reporting System Is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/01
Database Release Frequency: Biennially
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Source: EPA Regional Offices
Telephone: Varies
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact N/A
Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Date of Last EDR Contact 03/16/04
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/04
TC01222662.1r Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/* DATA CURRENCY TRACKfNG
ROD: Records Of Decision
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid In the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 04/05/04
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/04
DELISTED NPL- National Priority List Deletions
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
The National OH and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/04
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR Includes the following FINDS databases in this report PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometnc
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track Information on crvfl judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 04/05/04
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/04
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 04/20/04
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/04
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/19/04
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
MINES: Mines Master Index File
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 03/05/04
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Uens
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Federal Superfund Uens. Under the authority granted the US EPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order
to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability.
USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Last EDR Contact 05/04/04
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/04
Date of Last EDR Contact 04/05/04
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/04
Date of Last EDR Contact 03/30/04
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/28/04
TC01222662.1r Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED ADATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/91
Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Date of Last EDR Contact 03/12/04
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 06/24/04
PADS: PCS Activity Database System
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 03/30/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 05/12/04
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 06709/04
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin islands.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Date of Last EDR Contact 02/02/D4
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/04
STORMWATER: Storm Water General Permits
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of all facilities with Storm Water General Permits.
Date of Government Version: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact N/A
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact N/A
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields
properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields
Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalltles-especially those without EPA
Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots-minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with
brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments
at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts
under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement
Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients
when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients
based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided
through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 03/15/04
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 06/14/04
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, It required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/03
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact 02/02/04
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 05/10/04
TC01222662.1r Page GR-4
FUOS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
The listing Includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Date of Last EDR Contact 04/26/04
Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/05/04
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use In national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the plies are low; however, in some cases taBlngs
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized, in 1978,
24 inactive uranium mill tailings sites in Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, North Dakota,
South Dakota, Pennsylvania, and on Navajo and Hopi tribal lands, were targeted for cleanup by the Department of
Energy.
Date of Government Version: 04/22/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 06/21/04
Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 09/20/04
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and Includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry In the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease In agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the Information contained In the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/95 Date of Last EDR Contact 03/08/04
Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 06/07/04
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/01 Date of Last EDR Contact 03/23/04
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 06/21/04
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Toxic Substances Control Act TSCA Identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances Included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
FITS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodentidde ActVTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: N/A
Database Release Frequency: N/A
Date of Last EDR Contact N/A
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/02
Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
Date of Last EDR Contact 03/05704
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 06/07/04
TC01222662.1r Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA-CURRENCY TRACKING
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenrjade Act, as amended (92 Stat 629) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/01 Date of Last EDR Contact 04/19/04
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/19/04
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodentlcide ActVTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Rlght-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/13/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 03/22/04
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/04
STATE OF UTAH ASTM STANDARD RECORDS
SHWS: This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available Information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: N/A Date of Data Arrival at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active at EDR: N/A Elapsed ASTM days: N/A
Database Release Frequency: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact 03/02/04
SWF/LF: List of Landfills
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills In a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or Inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 05/01 /03 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 05/16/03
Date Made Active at EDR: 06/02/03 Elapsed ASTM days: 17
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact 05/10/04
LUST: Sites with Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an Inventory of reported leaking underground
storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 04/05/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 05/19/04
Date Made Active at EDR: 06715/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 27
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 05/19/04
Date of Government Version: 04/13/04
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Last EDR Contact 03/22/04
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/04
TC01222662.1r Page
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CUp^KY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASES)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands Information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report
OiVCas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS In 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs
from 1:100.000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category Including some oil, but primanly
gas pipelines.
Electric Power Transmission Una Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
Telephone: {800) 823-6277
This map Includes Information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This Information is provided
on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee Its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Sensitive Receptors: There are Individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile Immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges, These sensitive receptors typically Include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and faculties - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Canters: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Home*
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education In the United States, it is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Provider List
Source: Department of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Rood Zone Data: This data, available In select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR In 1999 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA,
NWi: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available In select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TC01222662.1r Page GR-9
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
C 2003 Geographic Data Technology, Inc., Rel. 07/2003. This product contains proprietary and confidential property of Geographic
Data Technology, inc. Unauthorized use, including copying for other than testing and standard backup procedures, of this product is
expressly prohibited.
TC01222662.1r Page GR-10
APPENDIX C
Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste Inspection Report
for Thermo Fluids
Wasatch Environmental. Inn.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
THROUGH:
PROM:
DATE:
File - Thermo Fluids, Inc. (Processor: UOP-006S-99)
Cheryl Prawl, manager^?^
Jay W. Richardson, Env. Scientist
David S. Wheeler, Env. Scientist
12 August 2003
SUBJECT: USED OIL INSPECTION REPORT
Date of Inspection:
Facility:
Site JD Numbers:
Facility Contact:
Notification:
Applicable Regulations:
Type of Inspection:
Participants:
Weather Conditions:
Time In/Out:
Report Prepared by:
6 August 2003
Thermo Fluids, Inc.
1710 West 2600 South
Woods Cross, UT 84087
[phone]
EPA ID#:
Used Oil Processor •
Used Oil Transporter
Used Oil Marketer -
Brian Barnard, Division Mgr.
UTR000000786
UOP-0068-99
UOP-0010-00
UOR-0060
Facility: 29 July 2003 @ 8:27 am, Brian Barnard
LHD: 31 July 2003 @ 3:03 pm, Mark Williams
R315-15 of the Utah Administrative Code
Scheduled Used Oil Processor, Transporter, & Marketer inspection
David S. Wheeler, DEQ/DSHW/Used Oil
Jay W. Richardson, DEQ/DSHWAJsed Oil
..Bnajijlsxnf^ . . -f....
Robert Vaughn, TJbenno Fluids, Inc.
Partly cloudy, -85° F, wind from south
8:57 am - 11:54 phi '
David Salas Wheeler '
Facility Description •. }- . r- >*.;..*• .&y v .....
Thermo Fluids operates a used oil storage/processing facility on the western portion of the old Cowboy
Oil tank farm (on property owned by Crown Asphalt), adjacent to a small air field. This property was
1
Memorandum -- 12 August 2002
formerly used by Genesis Petroleum for their used oil re-refinery and storage facility. The facility
consists of an office with small lab, a tank farm for storage of used oil and used antifreeze (consisting
mostly of steel tanks in concrete containment plus one large tank in containment which includes synthetic
liner and concrete), and two truck loading areas.
Credentials, Purpose, and Scope
David Wheeler and Jay Richardson met with Brian Barnard and Robert Vaughn of Thermo Fluids, Inc.
The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate Thermo Fluids' used oil management practices for
compliance with R315-15 of the Utah Administrative Code (the Rules). The scope of the inspection
included a tour of the facility and scrutiny of required records and plans.
'. - ' ' • • • • ' . ' .::' :''
Used Oil Operations at the Facility
Used oil is trucked in and loaded into steel tanks for storage.
Compliance Status
R315-15 Standards for the Management of Used Oil
R315-15-1 Applicability. Prohibitions, and Definitions
• = Thermo Fluids appears to be in compliance with this portion of the Rules.
R315>15-2 Standards for Used Oil Generators
R315-I5-3 Standards for Used Oil Collection Centers and Aggregation Points
R315-15-4 Standards for Used Oil Transporters and Transfer Facilities
4J. APPLICABILITY
/ :': •••• ' . " .
42 RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSPORTERS WHO ARE NOT ALSO PROCESSORS...
n.a.
43 NOTIFICATION
4A USED OIL TRANSPORTATION
4.5 REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION FOR USED OIL
r-use Clor-d-Tect kits. Use generator knowledge on Q-Lube loads.
4.6 USED OIL STORAGE ATTRANSFER FAQE3TIES :V>1
— n.a. — see processor section below —
4J . TRACKING ^ ^^- •> •.:••:••><
Most tickets appeared to be adequately filled out, with,an occasional missing generator signature.
However, Thermo Fluids failed to record the EPA ID numbers of a permitted used oil transporter
named Odyssey Transportation Inc. during the summer of2003. Odyssey had been transporting
used oil from Thermo Fluids' Woods Cross facility to its Las Vegas facility.
4JS MANAGEMENT OF RESIDUES
/
R315-15-5 Standards for Used Oil Processors and Re-Refiners
5.1 --APPLICABILITY - -
V ,.; -•. ...
2
52 NOTIFICATION
/
53 GENERAL FACILITY STANDARDS
/ - Thermo Fluids provided the inspection team with a copy of an updated spill contingency
plan during the inspection (which has been submitted to the Division receptionist).
5A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION FOR USED OIL
(see 4.5 above)
5,5 USED OIL MANAGEMENT
Thermo Fluids appears to maintain its facility in a manner that nurumizes.releases of used oil to
die ground.
• There were two small puncture holes discovered in the liner around the UO-1 tank.
One of the holes (see photo) was located on the norm face of the mound on which the
tank is placed, and is below the water marks on the liner from last spring (when a sump
pump failed and ground water filled the bermed area). The other hole was loaded
approximately half-way along the ^t^enrj. Robert Vaughn agreed to J>atch the holes
wifliin the week. There was no mdicStton of any iised ofihaving; been released Wlhe
bermed area.. Mr. Barnard indicated that the UO-1 tank was currently nearly empty
(down to about two feet).
• During our inspection, a trench was being excavated just, southeast of the Thermo
Fluids facility on property owned by eiu^r Crown Asphalt or Foreland. Groundwater
filled the bottom of the trench (which was only about 2-3 feet v^^g^:0^t ^^^ :. .c
deep), and there was a black oil product on the surface of this water. sbn^ p^ffipns of
the trench, the entire surface of the water was covered;with-this *black oil. See.attached
photos. The oil did not look like used oil. It was black like asphalt tar .but lessviscous.
It may be flmMhis oil|s^^fouTee of die ©Uy waterthat #eeps mto the southern t,
secondary containmeutnearoy (see previous inspection report). v *
Also, Brian Barnard and Robert Vaughn pointed :outmat;a.!£r^
years been oozing put of the ground in the (paved) parking area on hot days. David
Wheeler of the rospection team was shown this area, and it did indeed appear that a tar-
like substance has been extrading up through the asphalt in the southeast portion of the
parking lot located south of the Thermo Fluid offices. Thermo Fluids has coped with the
. .^aiaterialby coy^ ..
.were empty. r „ . . _ ,,
• Jay Richardson of the inspection team noted that drums of used oil filters had been
rernoyed fjpm.tte area in which they are usually stored moc(^^t^e>yjsou\d
.,. - 4>epicl^ ap^ - * * *4 >
M - g ^li3fflBWgffei^.^ \ ^ ^ 7, Z^'H.. . - •:. Kv • - *
S ' ••-.:.<
5J1 TRACKING
(see under 4.7 above) _
5J OPERATING RECORD AND REPORTING \.
We did not check mass balance or spill incident records.
5*9 OFF-SITE SHIPMENTSi'@FUSED OIL } v. ^
/ - •• ™-5y,
5.10 MANAGEMENT OF RJ3S1DBBS
R315-15-6 Standards for Used Ofl Burners Who Burn Off-Specification Used Oil...
n.a.
R315-15-7 Standards for Used Oil Fuel Marketers
1A APPLICABILITY
/
3
Memorandum - 12 August 2002
12 PROHIBITIONS
S
12 ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL
/
1A NOTIFICATION
/
2A TRACKING
/
16 NOTICES
n.a.
R315-15-8 Standards for the Disposal of Used Oil / - • • •• •
R315-1S-9 Emergency Controls
/
R315-15-10 liability/Financial Requirements.
R315-15-11 Closure
'•• -'-'^ n.a. -;' " • "'
R315-15-12 Reclamation Surety
R315-15-13 Registration and Permitting of Used Oil Handlers
R315-15-14 through R315-15-16
n.a. ,
Summary and Follow-up •<•"••-
The facility appears to be operated in a manner that generally complies with the used oil rules.
There were, however, some tracking omissions (see 4.7 above) and two small punctures in the liner
around UO-1 (see 5.5 above). Thermo Fluids personnel have agreed to rectify these problems in the
future.- "•' ;': :-; ' •
The inspection team also discovered a black oil on &e surface of the groundwater in a trench
southeast of the facility. However, the substance appears not to be used oil. Photos of the trenches have
been forwarded to Allan Moore of the Hazardous Waste Branch and Cheryl Prawl of the Planning/Used
Oil Section.
ugnature Date
attachments; Thermo Fluids photos, Crown Asphalt photos, inspection checklists, Notice of Inspection
form, and certificate of insurance ;??•"":'.' 7-
4
Thermo Fluids
1710 West 2600 South, Woods Cross, UT 84087
August 6,2003
Figure 1: Puncture in synthetic liner surrounding UO-1 tank (Bic Clic Stic provided for scale).
Crown Asphalt / Foreland tank farm (formerly Cowboy Oil)
1710 West 2600 South, Woods Cross, UT 84087
August 6,2003
Crown Asphalt / Foreland tank farm (formerly Cowboy Oil)
1710 West 2600 South, Woods Cross, UT 84087
August 6,2003
•* . v..
i < i
figure 3: as above
Crown Asphalt , foreland tank farm (formerly Cvvrboy Oil)
1710 West 2600 South, Woods Cross, UT 84087
August 6,2003
• Figure 5: Oil draining from excavated soil/fill at trench described above.
Figure 6: Trench being excavated (view looking north) toward Thermo Fluids facility, etc
Crown Asphalt / foreland tank farm (formerly Cowboy (Ml)
1710 West 2600 South, Woods Cross, UT 84087
August 6,2003
Figure 7: Trench (view looking south).
APPENDIX D
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Closure Documents
Michael O Lovin
Governor
„ Dianne R. Nieison, Ph D
f: i Cxrculive Direeior
t„. Brad T Johnson
Direcior
Utah!
Where ideas canntu
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
168 North 1950 Wesi
P.O. Box 144840
Sail Laie City. Utah 84 (14-4840
(80!) 536-1100
[phone] Fax
[phone] T.D D
www.deq.ulah.gov
ERRL-1648-03
October 9, 2003
I
Larry Bardwell
Crown Asphalt Products Company TH F" HftOll
2336 East Behrend Drive I I L L U U I T
Phoenix, Arizona 85024
Re: No Further Action, Leaking Underground Storage Tank Release
Cowboy Asphalt Terminal, located at 1710 West 2600 South, Woods Cross, Utah
Facility Identification No. 3000342, Release EUX
Dear Mr. Bardwell:
The file for this release has been reviewed by the Division of Environmental Response and
Remediation (DERR) project manager who has recommended that no further corrective action be taken at
this time. This no further action applies only to the specific Release ELJX. This recommendation is
based on the information contained in the file for this release. You, your consultant or another
representative supplied that information.
The information submitted indicates that any detectable petroleum contamination from this
release is not a threat to human health or the environment according to Utah Admin. Code rule R311-211.
In the future, if other evidence indicates a spread of contamination from this release that may cause a
threat, further corrective action may be required.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Hillary Mason, the DERR project
manager, at [phone].
F! Sincerely,
L
Brad T Johnson, Executive Secretary (UST)
Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board
6 BTJ/HLM/klv
ii
cc: Lewis Garrett, A.P.R.N., M.P.H., Director, Davis County Health Department
Mike Barrett, Cowboy Asphalt Products Company
U^i's RBCA Tier 1 Worksheet
^Owners/Operators complete the unshaded portion}.
*Thc Screening Levels art applicable only when the requirements /or distance to receptors art meu
•V 1?
r»alit> Name
,,;)tt « iy >*
, f^tily UKSIIOB and AtoeiMno Bo* Number: j
Facility Owe® Name and MUm (Ory/StateJZiB C«te}
Facility Owaei Phone • ( V'y • 1 i /' - '< i r "1
ftYtW. Area Cad* PhtmtNomixr
Amount h Contaminant Source Information
Produci Rckued Sia
EnsaisaJ uai) atotusT* fiUMgfRcttaatttftaewaj
OMOUIK lank pjpn dnnrmrt overfiUrSpitt DOW
Diesel ___»*»* _ J»)»UIJ dispense; oxerfUl/spitl Other.
Wane Oil ..«<. j _Z««* Aapenaei overftll/sptll Other _
Unknown task paawf dupemei o«af«iVtp«ll Other..
Otfaei _«a«k __jaaiaj _ditpeni« ovcrfitt/tptB Otter.
' contaminated soil T. ?.' Sources Removed: Jjank piping ./dispenser _free product ^contaminated soil m £"
Other Information: - 1 jyESl .r». -wo-*, rumufrj "T^-v
01
Currenl Land Use at die Site:
Surrounding Neighborhood:
c Land Use Information
. residential / commercial
residential . commercial
„, industrial
s industrial
(Note: Surrounding land use is Residential if one or more residences share a common property line with the Facility}
d. Soil Information
Depth to Top and Base of Contaminated Soil (feet below land surface): Zl
Soil Tvoefsi: -os^ *.\>~ ! Depth (feet below land surface!: * - ' ~jv
Method of Soil Type Identification (check applicable): 7 Unified Soil Classification Geologist's description
_Top \~L Base
e. Groundwater Information
Was groundwater present in excavations? Yes /No Thickness of Free Product: {jCii&L,
Depth to groundwater (feet below land surface): > g c^.o^t
Is groundwater impacted at any concentration: Yes No / . - ,
Groundwater flow direction (circle applicable): E.#ft N. S, SE, SW, NE. NW </ Inferred? Measured?
Slope direction of surface topography (circle applicable): E^)Nt S, SE. SW. r€,NW^<. *,\ „.y*
f. Distance from Source to Nearest Potential Receptor
(If any receptors are within 30 feet you must go to Tier 2)
Receptors (enter distance to each in feet)
Subsurface Utilities: > ^ Water line ' ±0 Sewer line * lc Natural Gas ' 3> 0 Storm Drain ' ID Telephone
^AaElectrical Other (specify) Vi>»ut W* A*
Property Line ^j£.Buildings (specify type: Residence «£ Commercial / other, specify)
The &wmxf&pmm mm «*baw • facility the map, as close as possible to teak, iadiottag #MS MKSk d»©ett©a, and
shows iocatioos of fee following property labeled ftWllW l
- Carrest aiitfac fa^^
• Utility lines (underground) • Ucatton of the release and known cooUttwwKion
- Buildings or other structures * Property lino
• Excavations * -* .t,~:.^\'. - Moritotiag wells
- Soil stockpiles ' * * J * • - Sample iocatioos
A hu^MCA LZiS&s \Q\H>;^ ' f.^U,t^\ tjbjAafei WHVW i^acA—k- t%r*i
tonvP. ftCU. La BiAJL ^a»«>^u..
Owner/Operator Must Submit Copies of Laboratory Analytical Data for all samples collected
LI
Date
Airport
Propern
THERMO FLUIDS LE/£ *CILfTY
(CAPCO OWNED!
CAPCO PROjJ \ AND OPERATIONS
Water line
1 Gas line
Airport
N
,:i i, Gw#l
' -1' SSP
#2 West UST.
6,000 gal.
Vehicle Maintenance
Shop
Ss#2; Gw#:
Concrete wing
Fence
Ss#2
#1 East UST
],700jaL^T
Buried electrical
Gw#2
El
CAPCO ASPHALT
TERMINAL OFFICE
1710 West 2600 South
Woods Cross, Ut.
Gwtfl
Ss#1
7600 Smith Street
KEY
Groundwater sampjfe
Soil sample w
USC soil sample ™
SCALE
lin.=20ft
wm
Petroleum Constituents in Soil (mg/kg)
Datt Depth (ft bis) Ethyl btnun* XyhMM N»pthil«n« Tt>M-fla*<»M«« MMHi OH « Ortaaa Oth»<
MSftMM Ms •0 120 •0 170 <0 13» •0 120 «0.24O 32 •SO
ft* »oulh««xi 12 <0120 •0 120 *Q 120 «0 120 •0 240
«2-W north and 12 0QO4 0.009 «0 0O2 <0002 0003 <0 0O4 •80
12 0 003 0 00? •ooo? •0002 •Q004 •0 004 •so
•2 W stodKM* «0.0087 0051 0.24 002? 024 0.028
ttiaanlnu tawala
IE 155-IBSL TO -1592-.M. „ioo...
Tun 0.3 0.9 61 23 23f -22. 1,500 10 W wop
APPENDIX E
Davis County Environmental Health
Written Response
Wasatch Environmental, Inc.
DAVIS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION
Delane 0. McGarvey
Mia.. EHS
division Director
3K9 South Main Street
P.O. Box 618
Farmington, UT 84025-0618
•el: [phone] or
•801) 444-2300, ext 3296
iDO: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
I
I
:
July 14, 2004
Julie Kilgore
Wasatch Environmental, Inc.
2410 West California Avenue
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
RE: Request for Site Information and Record Search
Property located at former Cowboy Oil facility
1710 West 2600 South
Woods Cross, UT
Dear Ms. Kilgore:
After searching our files, I submit the following information pertaining to the referenced
site:
• The site is currently located in a primarily commercial area with some new
residential housing nearby. Traditionally, heavy industrial use has characterized
the surrounding area. It is important to point out that site is located in close
proximity to the Skypark Airport, a major transportation route (Redwood Road),
and other facilities that have inherent environmental issues. In general, our
Division has received public complaints over the years relating to air, water, and
soil quality.
• Our files showed four specific environmental responses to the property:
1. On May 11, 1985, our Division responded to a large crude oil release that
was caused by a tanker rollover from Cowboy Oil Company. It was
determined that over 14,500 gallons of product was released into the ditch
along 2600 South. Our files indicated that the majority of the crude oil
was contained in the ditch but that significant contamination occurred on
the surface. The State Health Department later took ditch water samples
and determined water quality to be "satisfactory."
2. Our files showed that in 1991, the Department of Environmental Quality
responded to the site for a spill release. At that time, they determined that
some sort of tank release was occurring but could not be found. DEQ
hypothesized that the release was not from a regulated underground
storage tank and that it had been on going for an extended time period
Our files did not indicate any cleanup of the site.
3. On June 26,1993, approximately 50-100 gallons of unleaded gasoline
was spihcd onto the Cowboy Oil loading pad and entered a drain box. It
was also noted that product was evident in the drainage ditch. Cleanup of
the site was performed by Advanced Petroleum Recycling and appears to
have met our Division's requirements.
4. Several underground storage tanks were identified in close proximity to
the property. In particular, Skypark Airport and Cowboy Oil had
numerous tanks and potential problems that were mentioned in our files.
The Utah Division of Emergency Response and Remediation (DERR)
may provide more information regarding these and other relevant tanks in
the area.
As is the usual practice of the Division, I requested input from members of our staff for
recollection concerning the subject property. Their significant comments were
incorporated in this report.
Due care and diligence were exercised in researching this site. However, the Davis
County Environmental Health and Laboratory Division assumes no responsibility for
omissions from this report
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dave Spence, Environmental Health Scientist
DS/aw
APPENDIX F
Ownership History, Recorded Environmental Liens, and
Recorded Activity and Use Limitations
i
TITLE HISTORY LETTER
3
Prepared By
D.W. MOORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
4849 S. State Street, Suite #2
Murray, UT 84107
[phone]
FAX [phone]
A VISION OF TOMORROW, A DEDICATION TO TODAY
/-3
D.W. MOORE& ASSOCIATES, INC
Real Estate, 77Jfe & Environmental Consultant
4849 S. STATE STREET, SUITE #2
MURRAY, UTAH 84107
[phone]
dba TITLE & ESCROW SCHOOL OF UTAH
FAX [phone]
JULY 9, 2004
JUUE KILGORE
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL
2410 W. CALIFORNIA AVENUE
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84104
RE: Our Order No.: DWA20045050
Property Owner COWBOY ASPHAL T TERMINAL LLC
Property Location: 1710 WEST 2600 SOUTH, WOODS CROSS
Dear MS. KILGORE:
On JULY 6, 2004, you requested a report setting forth the title history for the Subject Property
located in WOODS CROSS, Utah. At this time, you supplied information to locate the property. From this
information and a review of the records of DAVIS County, the Subject Property, on which this report is
prepared, is more particularly described in said report.
The enclosed report sets forth those recorded documents, which have been indexed and affect
the Subject Property. This report is given to disclose the chain of title to the Subject Property during the
search period herein described. This report is limited to recorded documents and is subject to the
information available to the preparer.
This report should not be considered an abstract, a title report, a commitment for title insurance,
nor a policy of title insurance. Some of the information contained in this letter is the opinion of the
preparer. This letter is given to disclose only the information contained herein. No guarantees as to the
validity of any document listed herein, or as to status of the title to the subject property are made. You are .
advised to consult an attorney for any legal opinion on the status or condition of title in the subject
property. Any legal description contained herein is used only for reference purposes. There are no
representations make as to the accuracy of the legal description or its relationship to abutting property.
You are advised to obtain a survey, and to review the documents in the chain of title for the legal
description of the Subject Property.
This report is delivered and accepted upon the understanding that you have no personal
knowledge or intimation of any defect, objection, lien or encumbrance affecting the Subject Property other
than those shown herein, during the search period, and your failure to disclose, in writing, any such
personal information shall render this report, null and void as to such defect, objection, lien or
encumbrance. Any liability is limited to the amount paid for this report.
This report has been prepared according to standard research techniques. The preparer has
been a Licensed Abstractor as defined by the Utah Code, and is a licensed title insurance agent, qualified
to search and examine real estate records and titles in the State of Utah.
Thank you for the opportunity of allowing us to serve you.
Sincerely,
D.W. MOORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
David W. Moore, President
A VISION OF TOMORROW. A DEDICATION TO TODAY
D.W. Moore & Associates, ,nc. Page No. 4
I SUBJECT PROPERTY
SEE ATTACHED PLAT
Note: The Assessor or Tax Identification No(s)., together with the Assessed Property
Owner are:
06-085-0025 COWBOY ASPHALT TERMINALS, LLC
06-089-0086 COWBOY ASPHALT TERMINALS, LLC
II. TITLE SEARCH & INFORMATION
A. SCOPE OF SEARCH
1. From your request, the following index records of the DAWS County Recorder were
searched:
a. Tract Index for SEC 35, T2N-R1W, SLM.
b. Various documents to verify legal descriptions and parties involved.
c. Area Reference Plats, Ownership Plats, and other Plat Records for said county.
2. The following additional records, indexes, and information were reviewed in preparation of
this report:
a. Records of the DAWS County Assessor and Treasure to determine and/or verify
the Taxation or Identification number for the Subject Property.
b. Information found in the table of recorded documents contains any instrument
which the search has determined to be in the chain of title, Including any
institutional control and/or environmental lien affecting the subject property.
c. NIA
B. SEARCH INFORMATION
1. The Tract Indexes of the DAVIS County Recorder were searched from 1935 through
JULY 1, 2004 at 7:59 AM. From said search the documents set forth herein were found
and hereby disclosed.
Note: Because of the complexity of the chain of title, this list of documents only contains documents which
disclose specific Interests in and to the Subject Property. Atof all of those documents, which were
Indexed against the subject property, have been Included. Documents which do not transfer tltie,
which do not disclose new parties, or which would only disclose a mortgage interest or some similar
interest have been excluded.
2. For informational purposes, additional documents may have been included in the Table of
Recorded Documents. These informational documents affect property in the general area
of the Subject Property. These documents and the respective interest are disclosed for
informational purposes only. No additional search was made on these properties, and no
representations are made other than showing the particular document.
3. As additional support, a copy of the DAVIS County Ownership Plat has been attached to
assist in an identification of the Subject Property and to assist in showing the various
property boundaries as may be identified in the Table of Recorded Documents.
D.W. Moore & Associates, ic, Page No. £
As a synopsis of the information, attitude, and understanding derived from the completion
ot the review and search, the following comments and/or opinions, to support the
information herein set forth, are hereby set forth.
a. N/A.
5. Pursuant to your request, the following additional information is provided:
a. N/A
III. TABLE OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS
OOOJI
Warranty Deed
11/12/1935
11/11/1935
61459
1-N/130
Mamie E. Wan-Clinton L. Miils
Warranty Deed
05/28/1961
05/23/1961
221921
209/533
Clinton L. Mills Clinton L Mills
Warranty Deed
09/19/1962
09/25/1962
241535
250/655
Clinton L. Mills Keith L. Winegar
Deed
10/18/1962
10/22/1962
242649
252/505
Keith L. Winegar California Oil Co.
Sheriffs Deed
11/09/1967
11/13/1967
314765
378/680
Keith L. Wineoar Chevron Oil Co.
Warranty Deed
05/29/1968
06/17/1968
321359
392/635
Chevron Oil Co. Chevron Asphalt Co.
Deed
04/07/1971
05/10/1971
350833
456/140
Chevron Asphalt Co. Dunn Oil Co.
Warranty Deed
06/02/1971
06/02/1971
351892
458/469
Dunn Oil Co. Denton Lee Dunn, etal
Warranty Deed
09/12/1974
09/16/1974
401537
549/385
Denton Lee Dunn Dale D. Hancock
10 Quit Claim Deed
02/09/1976
04/061976
4311126
597/92
Cowboy Oil Co. Of Utah Dale D. Hancock, etal
D.W. Moore & Associates, ,ic Page No. 6
11
DOCUMENT
DATED -
Easement
03/28/1979
Record ec
Entr> No.
-Book t Pang_
04/04/1979
527545
761/279
Dale Hancock Mountain States Tel &
Tel.
12 Warranty Deed
06/11/1990
06/11/1990
893406
1355/640
Dale D. Hancock Hancock-Geisler R I C
Inc.
13 Quit Claim Deed
01/19/1999
01/19/1999
1478737
2431/1441
Morrison Oil Company Hancock-Geisler R I C
Inc.
14 Special
Warranty Deed
01/07/1999
01/22/1999
1480481
2434/962
Hancock-Geisler R I C
Inc.
Cowboy Asphalt
Terminal LLC
15
16
Special
Warranty Deed
09/12/2000
09/20/2000
1614290
2483/799
Dale D. Hancock Cowboy Asphalt
Terminal LLC
Easement
11/13/2001
02/15/2002
1730095
2986/1092
Cowboy Asphalt
Terminal LLC
Crown Asphalt Products
Company
APPENDIX G
Historic Topographic Maps
" ft, «•••» m 1 f. H""R mm if
26
if
y SKY HAVEN AtRfOfcT I . : I
7™"
Approxi rrjajfe
•Site Location
™. .... -:V-C—-r££
: loMi
2
.1
JL
I //
a J . (c S~\\ *225
T1&
r StocSya'd!
LAHS.
\4S>'8 mmm
S .
I or :
Salt ;yM 0;! TBnla
mi • it
G 1. ft *i
II I
»» * « » —-J
7-4 » . a;
s •. lis IK I 6 I 9^ Sft' APfSOXtMATI SCALe f*L)
t 3*^
S Si ALT 'SyL
% :i'--y-;y".
LAKE m
. ^"•"^•[ii.• AJIllfc^UO «v
1951 Historic Topographic Map, Former Cowboy Oil Property, Adaptec! From U. S. Geological Survey
Salt Lake City North, UT Quadrangle
WEI 1081-02
Pit / / Brat
26
*** f /
it
IK 7
1*1 t i«i ****
\ y «.» ' -1 o
\
s t
3N- . ^
6 „ 4.
» • . 1
> \
1
8M
^proWte
35 . :.?
.x # * •=-1, ..^
,4 :
- • *
at
rzKZ -9 3
a
•:*';**„
I
\
\\J| ^1MMB*W * i
O fa. »i 1
a. •••
5 i =4t
J f,
26
1M i i.
•: / // Jf/s-Jt* : otcftlri
'—^—
'mm -y. : • r4^^w1 *lVr>-- / i
. J I y -':y <r>y s"
• Y
•'^tEf If II j -mrX-.^-,{^" „v Adapted From U. S.
^T*^ Map's& «jsa^r ^^^^^
APPENDIX H
Westec Documentation
Wasatch Environmental inr*
June 28, 1994
Utah Division of Hfr Quality
150 North, 1950UJest
Salt lake City, Utah 84114^820
Attn.: Russell Roberts
Re: Grandfather Status of flboveground Storage Tanks
Dear Mr. Roberts:
fis per our conversation of the week of June 13, 1994, please find the following
information. UJestec, Salt Lake City, Inc. at 1600 €ast. 2600 South UJoods Cross, Utah,
lessees 11 aboveground storage tanks from Cowboy OH, Co. also of the address above.
UJestec utilizes these tanks for the purpose of wholesaling of blended motor fuels, and
operates under SIC code 5171.
In correspondence with Dick Griesler the owner and operator of Cowboy Oil, Co. .
He indicated that all tanks utilized by UJestec Salt Lake City, Inc. were installed well before
October of 1969. In addition the manufactures label on the tanks indicate chat the tanks
were manufactured in 1959. These tanks have not been modified or moved since their
installation. UJestec believes that these tanks are operating under grandfather clauses
allowing tanks installed prior to October 1969 to not be permitted for air pollution
emissions. If possible could you please forward documentation indicating that we are
exempt from the above permitting.
Correspondence can be directed to: UJestec Salty Lake City, Inc.
1493 Hgwy.6&50
fruita, Colorado 81521
Attn: Chris dark
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact James Stemrich,
Paul Brennan, or myself at [phone].
Sincejeltrr ^ ,
Chris Clerk
LUescourt environmental. Inc.
RA62094.LUPS
VACANT FIELD
CRYSEN
REFINING
(VACANT)
C0WT3OW0IL
COMPANY
OO
OO PIKE
O o
o
o OO
o ///
///
///
XSDA _J> c UNCCcocawenrMO
EARTHEN DIKE ***\
ULk
O O
o OO • o
AM Bm
IWSSTIC LOAWHO RAO.
OawtaaHO MUX
BASIN WESTERN
GATE
mm
WESTEC OFFICE
TRUCK. SCALE
GATE
DRAINAGE DITCH
1100 WEST Q = COWBOY TAN
s WESTEC TAN
NOT TO SCALE
, r ..muu r-ionv. JAN. 1. to: DEC. 31. J2!i_ SARA FORM t 007 fliv. 1-93
FACILITY NAME: westec Petroleum, Inc. (SIC Plant) BLDQ(NumberorAddress): mo west 2600 S. WoodsCross, UJ
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Rasa* ALL Inttructlont Mora comp/ef/ng form
CAS NUMBER: 6_8 5_lj& - _2 JO. - JL
PRODUCT on
LABtl)MAME' ARF Raffinate (B-Aromatic)
ow- • LU • • Q
SolW Liquid Gas Pure Mix
rLPLIH HWAIU
(~~} o^r** (*••»*)
ts tits product or any ot to Inotedkants on tha SARA
Ex*aroaty Hazardous Subetanca (EH9) tsf?
M-YEB-bt EHSNama:
•YES H NO
h* "HO* It tia chanUcal ikxad In amounts graalar
ft an tO.000 bi?
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS: TRADE SECRET
YES • NO
CA8 Number:
6 8 5 1 6 - 2 0 1 PercentolMixture: 99.9 V,
ingredient Name: Steam Cracked Middle Aromatic Naptha
CASNumbar:
Z i. I_3 Jl - _L 4_ - _i Percent of Mixture: 5^25 *><>
ingredient Name: Ethvl Tolnlene
CAS Number.
7 0 6 9 3 - 0 6 - 0 Percent of Mixture: 5-20 %
Ingredient Name: Alkylbenzenes
CAS Numbar:
2 _5. 5_W - 1_3 - _7_ Percent of Mixture: 15-4 5 %
Ingredient Name: Trlmethyl Benzene
CAS Numbar;
Percont of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX.
ON
SJT6
ON
sirE
AS Pounds v.
LCuFtBTP
Galon*
(u*» achjal qoarObw)
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTR(8) ~.
o; 10 it 12
AONTH3
(Ckda al that Apply)
8TORAQE INFORMATION
(f^on-Confldontlal)
yrr.
^StoVag© 5 r~
mmm m
iSmmm
Stalemenl about how thla chemical to used;
Product, Is used as gasoline .hien&Losu J components
HAZARD CLASSES
D Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
• Carclnogon
• Corrosive pH
D Cryogenic
• Exptosh/o
• Flammable Qaa
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agent a
• Organic Peroxide
• Olher Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Peatlekie
• Pyroprtoflc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
O Water-RooclNe
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
ELAliUABLEXCQMBUST]DLE_LIQUID.S:
• Class tA Q Class II
XXfl Class IB Q Class IIIA
• Class 1C • Class HIB
LrQUIElEDJ3 EJRQLEUM O AS (LPQ. LFl- O A S)
O LPQ In BLDQ3 -nol accassbte to pobf»c
O LPQ ki BLDQ3 accas8l)l« lo (ha ptrfiric
In t-LB containers
LPQ In pubic assembly buildings
LPQ at construction alias.
LPQ outside
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablHty NOTE: r*c 0-4
fitting s^i
Health
4-
Roacllvtiy
Spoclol Hazards
-W- OX COR RAD
(CWcIa at thai Apply)
TN» ChomktJ kov.nlofY R»po«l Form m#ale ltv» reporting rarjuUamanta ot S.A.n A. Till* III, Tlar II rUpoiUog Form and |h« Uniform Flra Coita. Page t.3 of J_3_
HI v I_M » wn i ncr'UrU
FACILITY NAME: westec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant
REPORT!^ PERIOD From: JAN. I, to: DEC. 31. '993 SARA FORM I 002 1 <*2
BLDQ (Nurnber or Address): 1710 West 2600 S. WoodsCross, V
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL Inatrvctlonu barora completing form
CAS NUMBER: 6 4 7 4 1 - 6 8-0
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) NAME: Aromatic Solvent 104
WlY3TJU.UJWUyilLN
• ® • • rj
Sotkj Liquid Gas Pure Mix
TE7CTH HAZAHT
f"""1 D«UT«<J (c»»crJc)
la fits product or any ol It* Ingredlenta on the SARA f—|\/£*G fxl Ml**l
Exfremaryllaiifdou* Substance (EH3) fat? I i • '—I NU
tt-YE8* 1st EMS Name:
II 'HO' U tia chemical tlorad In amounts greater
than 10.000 bs? DP YES • NO
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS: TRADE SECRET: [
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AVQ.
ON ON
SITE SITE
89 4 5 Pounds
Cu Ft 8TP
QaRons
(tut actual quanOl**)
CA8 Numbar:
I JL 1_5_L -1L-_I Percent of Mixture: _25. %
ingredient Name: Trlmethylbenzene
CAS Numbar:
1 3 3 0. 2 0 - 7 Percent of Mixture: 10 %
Ingredient Name: Xylene
CAS Numbar:
9 _8_ - _8_Z - _8_ Percent of Mixture: 7 %
Ingredient Name: Cumene •
CAS Numbar:
Percent of Mixture: •A
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numbar:
Ingredient Name:
- - Percent of Mixture:
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTH(S)
ALLMONTH3
(Chela al mat Apply)
to
5
STORAGE INFORMATION
(Non-ConlWentlal)
Storage Locations
Westec Tank Farm North of Office
SETTC NVMPY mmm cms PA# FOR HKIM. Slalernent about how this chemical Is used:
Product is used as blending component in
gasoline
HAZARD CLASSES
• AeroBol Products
• Blasting Agent
O Carcinogen
• Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammablo Gas
• Hazardous Waste
O Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Other Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Pealickie
• Pyrophorlc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
O Unstable (Reactrvo)
LI Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FLAyMABLELCQ.MBUSIlBLEXlQUID^;
• Class 1A Q Class II
XO Ctaas IB n Class III A Class IB
Class 1C B Class HIB
LIQUIFIED PETI1QLEUMJ3ASJLPQ4 LP;G AS
• LPQ In BLDQ3 -not access tola to public
O LPQ In BLDQ9-accessfjle lo the public
In ILBconlalonrs
LPQ In public assembly buHdlngs.
3 LPQ al construction alias.
LPQ outside
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD HATING
RammablBty NOT£:«««<n
kl tot
Health Reactivity
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Ckcle a» thai Apply)
Thla Crv»mkoi Inventory RsporI Form me«U lh« reporting requirements of 8.A.R.A. Till* III. Tl*r II Deponing Form end the Uniform Fire Code. Page 12 of
ncruiiii.tJ PERIOD Fiom: JAN. t, to: DEC. 31. 1993 SARA FORI! 9 002 fW
FACILfT Y NAME: HeUec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant) BLDQ (Number or Address):r,i 71 o we it; ^^^^^^^l^K^x*
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL Instruction* baton completing form
CAS NUMBER: l_g &_ - _8 SL " X
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) MAME: Tolulene
mr^OTjf^Tjgrnq
• 0 • Q •
«wy: Solid Liquid Qa» Pure Mix
Ct*K* mi
RE7CT1TTTO7TO"
|X~j InvnodUIci (xuie)
Is tils product or any of Ha ingredients on the SARA
Ertremery r laiardoua Subatanca (EH3) est?
It "YES" 1st EMS Noma: •
•YES B NO
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AVO.
ON ON
SITE SITE
JO. dn Pounds
CuFLBTP
On Bom
(uia ecturi quantities)
5
STORAGE INFORMATION * *S&3r
.(Non^f^iHlaV^!/
Storage Locsriores ,
Westec Tank Farm North of of fj
If "WO* Is Bio chWTttcal stored In amounts p/aaler
Si an 10.000 bs? BYESDNO
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS: TRADE SECRET
PEAK INVENTORY
WONTH(8l
1 £ 3 4 (|)®
10 fl 12
SONTHS
(Ckcta al that Apply)
•?T*lT17^ I nS^tTTIkCTT F ^cocts PACE ron iracpnrtt
Statement about how this chemical Is used:
Product is used as gasoline blending
component
CA8 Number:
. L Q_8- - _i Percent of Mixture: 99.9 W>
Ingredient Name: T^JLulene -
CAB Numbar:
Percent ol Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numbar:
Percent ol Mixture: %
Ingredient Name:
CAS Number;
Ingredient Name:
Percent of Mixture:
CAS Numbar:
Ingredient Name:
Percent of Mixture: %
HAZARD CLASSES
• Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
O Carcinogen
• Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Gas
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Other Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
O Pesticide
O Pyrophorlc
• Radioactive
Q Toxic
O Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
BLAIMiABlJSjLCQMaUS^
• Class 1A Q Class II
XJC 3 ctass IB rj Class IHA
J Class IC • Class DIB
LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GASJ.LPQ, LE O AS)
O LPQ In BLDGS -not accessbla lo pobHc
O LPQ In BLDG3 -accessbla to trie public
in t-LB containers
LPQ In public assembly buHdlnps.
LPQ at construction sites.
LPQ outslda
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablHty NOTE: «•«* 0-4
Ruling
la bat
Health
4-
Reactivity
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Circle al thai Apply)
Thla Chemtcet Inventory Report Form m*«ta llw reporting requirements ol 8.A.R.A. Till* Ml, Tier II Reporting Form and Ihe Uniform Fire Codo. Page 1! of 13
REPORTiNl cRIOD From: JAN. I, torDEC.31. 1993 SARA FORI! 9 002 I )<-92
FACtLffV NAME: Westec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant)
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL Inutructlant bofnra conipJell/ig form
CAB NUMBER: Mixture
PRODUCT OR
LABEL) NAME: SBE Dimer
FRY9CAL LLMAjy 1IUN
c^- • m • • LD
**w*: Solid Liquid Gas Pure Mix
Is ills product or any ot Its Ingredients on the 8ARA
Extremely Hazardous Substance (EHS) Bsf?
»-TE8* tat EH3 Name:
•YES HI NO
BLDQ (Number or Address): 171 o West 2600 s. woodsCross, UT
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AVO.
ON Oft
SITE 3ITE
45 _2Q Pounds
CU.FLSTP
QaSons
(ut* (dual quant*)**)
I
STORAGE INFORMATION
(Non-Conlktentlal)
Stor age Locations
Westec Tank Farm North of off tee...
If "HO* Is tie chemical stored in amounts grealor
ban 10.000 bs?
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS:
BYESDNOj
iLXL TRADE SECRET
CAB Numbar:
1 4 2. 9 6 .1 Percent ol Mixture:
ingredient Name: Butyl Ether
CAS Numbar;
J_ 0_6 - __? J_ • JL Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name: Butane
CAS Numbar:
J_ Q_6- __9 JL - JL Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name: Butane
%
CAS Numbar:
Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numbar:
Percent ol Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTHS)
3 4 ®(6)
1(9) 10 11 12
ONTH3
(Circle al that Apply)
1 2
k»'^i; i;kV:iL» ;ii:^»:;ii ^TfXKXS PAGE TOR OMICJXrrS
Stalement about liow this chemical la used: .
Product is used as a blend component ;|
in gasoline
HAZARD CLASHES
Q Aerosol Products
D Blasting Agent
• Carclnogon
P Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
O Explosive
• Flammable Gas
O Hazardous Wasle
• Highly Toxlc
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Other Health Hazard
O Oxidizer
• Pestteldo
• Pyroplwlc
Q Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
ELiUMIIlABLJEJJ^
yjQ Class tA Q Class It
B Class IB rj Class III A
Class 1C • Class IIIB
LrQUIEIErj_p^TTiQLj^iUiAS^
• LPQ In BLDQ3 -not accessbla to pobBc
• LPQ In BLDGS -accassbte to the public
hi t-LB containers
"] LPQ In pubHc assembly buddings.
LPQ al construction sites.
LPQ outside
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
NOTE:"-" nammablWy
Riding
In tot
Health < ft Reactivity
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Ckcle al thai Apply)
4-
Thla Chemical Inventory Report Form meets I ha reporting requirement* of S A.R.A. Title III. Tlar II Reporting Form and the Uniform Fire Code. Page 10 of 13
#002 fW. I-S2
FACILITY NAME: Westec Petroleum, inc. (SLC Plant BLDQ (Number or Address): i?io West 2600 s. WoodsCross, in
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL rnifruct/on* before completing; form
CAS NUMBER: Mixture
STORAGE INFORMATION
(Non Confldonilal)
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) NAME: Nalco 5407
FRY!JLALUJM^IIJN
• m • • m
Solid Liquid Gas Pure Mix
RE7C1H WMir
Q (at*oris)
\s tils product or any ol Its Ingredients on The SARA
Extremely H«i*rdou* Substance (ER3) ast?
H "YE8* fal El 13 Name: ;
•YES B NO
It *HO* ti The chemical stored In amounts greater
t\an 10.000 fos? YES El NO
CHEMICAL INGREDtENTS: TRADE SECRET:
CAS Numb«r:
1 0 0 4 i Percent ol Mixture: 5-10 H
ingredient Name: Ethylbenzene
CAS Numbar:
6 8 6 0 3- 0 8 - 7 Percont ol Mixture: 20-40 %
Ingredient Name: Heavy Aromatic tlaptha
CAS Number.
Mr,
I-
• mm
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AVQ
ON ON
SITE SITE 5 Storage Locations
Wester, t ank f a r.m, rinr Ih• Jrit|&%tti%l ftflO 400 Pounds
CuFLBTP wsm office
Galons
(u»e ectuii quanUlM) am Statement about how this r^emteal &
Gasoline additive ,*
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTH(S)
1 2 3 4 (tp (J)
7J P) v@) 10 11 12
ALL MONTHS
(Circle al thai Apply)
MB
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FLAUMABLFJCOMDUSTlBLrL LIQUIDS:
• Class 1A Q Class II
S Class IB xxfn Class III A
Class 1C • Class "IB
SI- 20-3 Percent ol Mixture: 1-5 %
Wfopthalene
W'^il Percent of Mixture: 1-5 %
Percent ol Mixture:
Ingtedfeht Name:
• HAZARD CLASSES.
• Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
• Carcinogen
• Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Gas
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Other Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Pesticide
• Pyropltorlc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
LrQUIOErjJrZETJM
• LPQ in BLDQ3 -nol accessble |o public
• LPQ In BLDGS -accessble to the pub*c
In t-LB containers
LPQ ki public assembly buildings,
LPQ al construction sites.
• LPQ outside
B
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablHty NOTE: o*
firing ~\J
ktbo* ^
Heallh
-W-
Reactlvtly
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Circle al thai Apply)
TWe Chemfcei Inventory neport Form meats Irva reporting requirement* of S A R A. Title 111. Tier II Reporting Form *nd the Uniform Fire Code. PflfJO 9 of J 3
REPORTlk_ PERIOD Floor. JAN. 1. to: DEC. 31. _JL£12_ BARA FORU f 002 92
FACILITY NAME: Wcstec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC PUnt) BLDQ (Nuinber or Address): 1710 west 2600 S. WoodsCross, in
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL /niirucl/on« bofora completing form
CAS NUMBER:
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) NAME: _
Mixt ure
Trick Racing Fuel
c~- • mo • •
Solid Liquid Gas Pure Mix
HcALIH IWZAI4J
|X j krancoUM (acuta)
| | rwlared (chior*:)
Is tils product or any ol Its Ingredients on the 8ARA
Extremery Hatardou* Substance (EMS) asf?
B"YE8* Sat EMS Name:
•YES B NO
If "NO" is be chemical stored in amounts grealer
ban 10.000 ros?
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. Ava.
ON ON
SITE SITE
4000 2000 Pounds
Cu.FLBTP
Galons
(us* actual quantities)
YES ED NO I
CREMICAL iNGREDtENTS: TRADE SECRET:
CA8 Numbar:
. j^acious. - - Percent of Mixture: 99,9 U
Mixture of Aliphatic & Aromatic
ingredient Name: Hydrocarbons
CAS Numbar:
Percent ol Mixture: %
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numtwrr:
Percent ol Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numbar:
Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numbar:
Percent ol Mlxturo:
Ingredient Name:
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTH(8)
1 2 3 4
© ® ®@ 11 12
ALL MONTHS
(Circle al that Apply)
STORAGE INFORMATION
{Non-Confidential)
Storage Locations
Westec Tank Farm North of office
SEE TIE rMNTotrr wrmrio cats PACE FOR imai^
Statement about how this chemical Is used:
Gasoline product used for high
performance engines
HAZARD CLASSES
Q Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
O Carcinogen
• Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Geo
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
O Organic Peroxide
• Olher Health Hazard
D Oxidizer
• Pesticide
III Pyrophorlc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FLAMMABL£1CQM0U5T1DLE_L1QUII?^;
0 Class IB
Class 1C
Class If
Class IDA
Class HIB
LIQUIFIED EETflQLEUIflJQAS(LEa^LPzD AS)
• LPQ In BLDGS -not accessble lo public
• LPQ In BLDGS -accessble lo the public
In t-LB containers
LPQ In pubic assembly buildings.
LPQ al construction sites.
U LPQ outside
B
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablHty NOTE:«»« <M
ftmtinq
hbo*
Health Reactivity
Special Hazatd3
-W- OX COR RAD
(CWcle al thai Apply)
This Chemkel Inventory Report Form meet* l!v» roportlng requiremenle ol 8.A.R.A. Till* 111.Tier II Reporting Form end the Uniform Fire Code. Page _8 of J 3
REPORTING PERIOD From: JAN. 1, lo: DEC. 31. JUL r 6ARA FORII f 002 t. 1-92
FACILITY NAME: westec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant) BLDQ (Number Of Address): 1710 West 2600 S., WoodsCross in
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Head ALL rnalrucf/ona before completing (orm
CAB NUMBER: 7 7 - 7 0 -6
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) NAME: Dlcyclopentadlene (LAB)
TTrTTCTCITJvRrJILN :
o^- • 0 • • •
Solid Uqutd Gas Pure Mix
HLALIH 1VYAHJ
| jj kranadUW |uuM)
|~j n+mfd (ctvarfc)
la this product or any ot Ks ingredients on the SARA
Extremely Hazardous SubsUnca (EHS) asf?
«TE8-falEH3Name:
•YESLUNO
It *NO* la be chemical stored ki amounts greater
ben 10,000 bs7
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS:
El YES • NO
TRADE SECRET: [ |
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AVO..
ON ON
SITE SITE
80 40 Pounds
CU.F18TP
Galons
(use actual rjuantMea)
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTIES)
1 2 3 4 5 (&)
(j) ©ft) 10 11 T2
TlLTvlONTHS
(Clrde al that Apply)
STORAGE INFORMATION I
(Noo-Contldentlal)
Storage Locatloos
Tank Farm. North of Office
QpPffPA »IaTi.U:M.£K
Statement about how this chegrlcal to used:
Product is used as a blending component
CA8 Numbar:
L Q__8- J. 8_ - J. Percent ol Mixture: 0-1,5 V.
ingredient Name: Toluene
CAS Number:
2_5 0_ 1_3- _1_ 5_ - A. Percent ol Mixture: 3.0 %
Ingredient Name: Vinyl Toluene
CAS Number:
9_5- 1 _3 - _6_ Percent ol Mixture: 2.8 %
Ingredient Name: Indene
CAS Numbar:
. 9_2- __5_2 - _4 Percent ol Mixture: 1.6 %
Ingredient Name: Blohenvl
CAS Numbar:
. - • Percent ol Mixture: 8 %
Ingredient Name: A-Methyl Styrene.
• Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
• Carcinogen
O Corrosive pH
O Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Gas
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infodlous Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Olher Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Pesticide
• Pyroplvorlc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water- ReocUve
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FLAMMABLE /. C0MBUSI1BLEJJQUIQS:
• Class 1A p Class II
B Class IB rj Class III A
Class 1C • Class HIB
LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM OAS (LPQ,.LP^G AS)
O LPQ In BLDGS -not accessble lo public
O IPG In BLDG3 -accessble lo the public
In t-LB containers
LPG In public assembly buHdlnrjs.
IPG at construction sites.
• LPG outside
B
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
RammablHty
Reactivity
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Circle al thai Apply)
NOTE: f*-™ *•«
RmUng \ i
In tx>«
Health
-w
4-
Thla Chemical Inventory neporl Form meata the reporting rarfuUanianta ol B.A.n.A. Till* Ul, Tlar It n«porllog Forrn end tha Unllorm Flr» Code. Page 7 of 1
REPORTinC* PERIOD From: JAN. l, "' to: O^C.Ah-.-J^^m^'- M
F ACUITY NAMEj Wei.e, n't\rn\numj-:\W&K^^^;M& V
Rae-d ALL fh$trvct!dri» bmfort) complMmglotair
CAS NUMBER: L_3 .1 °_ - A ?_ - JL
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) NAME: Xy1ene
HffyLAL IJMUM I UN
«**..• LI • • 0
•w^py: Solid Liquid Gas Pure Mix
HbALIH HA/ATtU
Xj lmm«Sat* (acuta)
"T rw.r«>» (t*»«nJc)
la tils product or any of Its ingredients on the SARA
Ertemety Hazardous Suostance (EHS) tst?
» -YES* asl EHS Name:
mum 5r tut H
tORA 1 • mm
Stwi^L(?CAIiori» j
Westec Tank Farm. West of QtfVet 8 5 40 Pounds
Cu.FLSTP
Gallons
MAX. r AVTJ.'V
ON "', ON.
SUE SITE
(use eduri quontBlea)
•YESHNOl
It "NO* Is the chemical stored In amounts greater
than 10.000 bs?
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTH(B)
2 3 4 6 (Ji
(7 10 11 12
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS:
jfl YES • NO I (c^ai^^ptyj
••ri
Statement about how this chemical b used:
Product is used as a blending component
TRADE SECRET
CAB Number:
10_0 _4 J_ - i_ Percent of Mixture: 3-35 H
ingredient Name: Ethvlbenzene
CAS Number:
1 3 3 0 - 2 0 -7 Percent ol Mixture: 60-95 %
Ingredient Name: Xylene
CAS Numbar:
Percent of Mixture: %
Ingredient Name:
CAS Number:
Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numbar:
Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
• HAZARD CLASSES
• Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
• Carcinogon
• Corrosive pH
O Cryogenic
• Explosive
D Flammable Qaa
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
O Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Olher Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Pesticide
• Pyropltortc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Wator-Reactlve
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FLAMMABLE LCQMQ'JST) BLE_ LIQUID?;
• Class 1A Q Class II
n Class IB n c,asa ,,,A
XX&J Class 1C • Class HIB
• LPG m BLDGS not accessble lo pubHc
• LPG In BLDGS accessble to the public
In 1-LB containers
LPG In pubHc assembly buHdlnga.
LPG al construction sites.
• LPGoutaWa
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablHly NOTE: Pfeee <M
flung \ »
in boa -
Health
4-
Reactivity
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Circle al that Apply)
ThJs Chemical Inventory Report Form meal a the reporting raqukementa of 6 A.n.A. Title III. Tier II Reportkig Form anrl the Uniform Flro Corte. Pago 6 of 13
\\\ (•<)!<(IHU PCfUOn From: JAN. 1, lo:OEC. 31. _12H.
FACILITY NAME: Westec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant)
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL Insirucr/ont before completing form
CAS NUMBER: 6 5 9 9 6 . 7 8 -3
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) MAME: Light Oil
• 0 • • •
***w*: Solid UquW Gas Pure Mix
TT^RTTOAHT
| | 0*(«|«<i (of»orfc)
t» IMs product or tny ol Its ingredients on the 8ARA
Extremely Hazardous Bubstance (EH3) 1st?
It "YES" tst EHS Name:
•YES B NO
It "NO* Is be chemical stored in amounts greater
ban 10.000 bs? YES • NO
CHEMICAL !NGREDtENT8: TRADE SECRET:
BLDQ (Number or Address): 1710 West 2600 S. WoodsCross, u"
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX.
ON
SITE
AVQ.
ON
SITE
Pounds
CuFiaTP
Galons
(use actual quantUea)
CAS Numb«r:
7 1 4 3 - 2 Percent ol Mixture: 62.2 U
Ingredient Name: Benzene
CAS Numbar:
J_0_8 - 8_8_ - 3_ Percent of Mixture: 17.4 %
Ingredient Name: Toluene
CAS Number:
2 _5_ - _1 JL - i_ Percent of Mixture: 5.6 %
Ingredient Name: Indene ;
CAS Number:
13 3 0-20 - 7 Percent of Mixture: 4.5 %
Ingredient Name: Toleune
CAS Numbar:
_ J_0_0- Ji-i Percent ol Mixture: 2.6 %
Ingredient Name: Styrene
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTIES)
1 2 3 4 6 (0)
©®® 10 11 12
ALL MONTHS
(Clrdo al that Apply)
it
STORAGE INFORMATION
(Non-Conlldentlnl)
Slorage Locations
Rlpnrl f.nmpnnpnr r rink. Farny_jaxir-th
of Office
SEE T) c rMNTQKY POOLS PAO. FOR preCRC^
Statement about how this cbornlcal la used:
Product is used as a blending component.
HAZAJlLLCLASSEa
• Aerosol Products
O Blasting Agent
• Carcinogen
O Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Qas
• Haiardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Oilier Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
O Pestlcldo
• Pyrophorlc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FLAMUABLE/XQMBUST1BLE LIQUIDS;
• Class !A Q Class II
Xffl Class IB Q Class III A
• Class 1C Q Class HIB
LIQUIFIED EETRQ L EUM _QASJLPG._ LFM3 A S)
• LPG In BLDG8 -not accessble lo publtc
D LPG In BLDG8 -accessble lo the public
In 1-LB containers
1 LPQ In pubic assembly buildings.
J LPG al construction sites.
1 LPG outside
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
Rammablllty NOTE:"** 0-4
In bo.
Health
4-
ReactlvHy
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Circle al thai Apply)
Thla Chemical Inventory Report Form meat a Itva reporting ranubanianta of 8.A.R.A. TltU Ul. Tier II Rapoitlng Fcwm and lha Uniform Flr« Codo. Pane 5 of 13
4
REPORTING PERIOD From: JAN. 1, Jo: DEC. 31. 1993 SARA FORM. 9 002 K t-92
FACILITY NAME: Hcstec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant) BLDQ (Number or Address): 17 10 West 2600 S. WoodsCross, Ui
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL /ns(ructions baton completing form
CAS NUMBER: 8_0_0 JL - 6_ 1_ - !_
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL)NAME: Natural Gasoline
IWriOLLUMJUIIllN
CM. D mo • •
*-<***: Sotkj Liquid Qas Pure Mix
HfcALIH RAZAJCT
(3{| bMhM (««*•)
| | rMa|«f (cr»ortlc)
Is into product or »ny ol Its ingredients on the 8ABA jj—IVCC —I un
Extremely Hazardous 8ubslance (EHS) far? | | ICQ IHJ NU
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AVO.
ON ON
SITE SITE
120 5_£> Pounds
CUFL8TP
Galons
(ute actud quenUHe*)
STORAQE INFORMATION
(Non Confidential)
Storage Locations
Tank Farm: North of Office
It "YES* 1st EHS Name:
If "NO* Is be chemical stored in amounts greater
ban 10.000 fos7
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS: TRADE SECRET:
YES • NO
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTH(8)
1 2 3 4 (5
®(B)® 10 Tl 12
ALL MONTHS
(Cjfde al that Apply)
^r, ccces PAC* FOA rxgcirONs k»:^i{17iv7iL^ti;*k»:;ti
Statement about how this diemlcal la used:
Product Is used as a blending component
CAS Number:
1 1 a 8 2 -7 Percent, ol Mixture: 3.0 H
Ingredient Name: Cvclohexane
CAS Numbar:
L-l_fa-_5.A_-2_ Percent of Mixture: 7.5 %
Ingredient Name: Normal Hexane
CAS Numbar:
_ N/A_ - - _ Percent of Mixture: 85.0 %
Ingredient Name: Isoparaflns
CAS Number:
1_0_6 - 9_7_ . 8_
Ingredient Name: Butane
Percent of Mixture: 3.5 %
CAS Numbar:
Ingredient Name:
Percent of Mixture: Va
HAZARD CLASSES
O Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
• Carcinogen
O Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Gas
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Other Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Pesticide
• Pyropborlc
• Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
H^IIAiU^ij:QMBUSJlBLEU.lflUlDS:
XEJCtasstA Q Class II
B Class IB Q Class III A
Class 1C • Class 11JO
LKiUlFlELTPETRQLEUMJ3AS (LPG. LJifl A 5)
• LPQ In BLDG3 not accessble lo public
• LPG In BLDGS -accessble to the public
In t-LB containers
LPQ In pubic assembly buHdIngs.
J LPQ at construction sites.
LPQ outside
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablKty NOTE: f^c* <M
Ruing \ ,
In bo,
Health RoactlvHy
Special Hazards
-W- OX COR RAD
(Circle al that Apply)
Thle Chemical Inventory Repot I Form maete the reporting requirements of S.A.n.A. Title III. Tier II neporUng Form end the Uniform Flro Code. Page U of _13
FACILITY NAME: uestec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant)
PRODUCT OR
LABEL)NAME- Super Unleaded Gasoline
:run i inu r tftlUU From: JAFT'l, IQTTJEC. W, 19^'"
T3H1
•rf*PWKI^
SARA FORM I 002 . 1-TJ2
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL lnilrucr/on« before completing form
CAB NUMBER: mixture
RflbTLALUJrTUailJN
CM- • is • • •
**»«*: Solid UqukJ Gas Pure Mix
HtALIH HAZARD
PT| «Txrv.dL»H (acuta)
|~j May** (ohfimk)
la bla product or any ot Its Ingredients on the SARA |—f\fCO IY"I MC\
Extremely ttaiardoua Subatanca (EHS) Ist? | 1 Y CO LLJ NU
K"YE8" Ist EHS Name:
It "NO" Is Ha chemical stored In amounts greater
man 10.000 ros? YES • NO
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS: TRADE SECRET:
BLDG (Number or Address): 1710 West 2600 S. WoodsCross, in
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AV0.
ON ON
SITE SITE
420 2)0 Pounds
Cu.FlBTP
Galons
(us* actual quanUHea)
5
STORAGE INFORMATION
(NcjnConfldentlal)
Storage Locations
Finished product storage tanks
West of office
PEAK INVENTORY
UONTHiB)
12 3 4 <5){£)
(?) (8)(£> 10 11 12
iALL MONTHS
(Ctrcta al that Apply)
K-Ctn^iT-i'lL^riL'tfllfrf CrXKPACErTjfttjroCTtO^
Statement about how this cherjrucal Is used: .
Sold as finished product \
CAS Numbar:
N/A_
Ingredient Name:
Percent ol Mixture: 99.9 %
Mixture of Aromatic &
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
CAS Number:
Percent ol Mixture: %
Ingredient Name:
CAS Number:
Ingredient Name:
Percent ol Mixture: %
CAS Number:
Ingredient Name:
Percent ol Mixture:
CAS Number:
Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
• Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
• Carcinogen
• Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Gas
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
Q Olher Health Hazard
Q Oxidizer
• Pesticide
• Pyrophorlc
• Radloacllvo
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FlAMIMflLE/jCQMBUSIIBLEAlQUIDS:
XJTJC Class tA
B Class IB
Class 1C
Crass It
Class IIIA
Class HIB
LrQUIElEDJ>EJRDLEUMGAS (LPQ.LE^OAS)
• LPG In BLDGS -not accessble lo public
• LPQ In BLDGS -accessble lo the public
In t-LB containers
LPQ In pubic assembly buddings.
LPQ at construction altos.
LPQ outside
B
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablHty NOTE:
HmUna
In bo>
Health Reacllvfiy
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Circle al bat Apply)
This Chemical Inventory naport Form meals ttvs raportlng requirements of 6 A.R.A. Title 111, Tier It Reporting Form and tha Unllorm Flro Code. Page 3 of 13
REPORTING PERIOD From: JAN. 1. to. DEC. 3t. 1993 SARA FORU I 002 v t-«
FACILRY NAME: westec Petroleum, Inc. (SLC Plant) BLDQ (Number or Address): 17 10 West 2 600 S. WoodsCross, U T
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL Instruction* batons compiafrng form
CAS NUMBER: _ mi x_t_"I_e - - __
PRODUCT OR
LABEL) NAME: Unleaded Gasoline
RtraLALUJM-jyilUN
cw- • • m • •
•wwv. Solid Liquid Qaa Pure Mix
HLAL1H HAZAI1J
| Xj ImnwdUM (»ouu(
f~| D«t>T*l (clonic)
b tils product or any ol Its Ingredlanta on the 8ARA |—Ix/CC tX~l MD
Extremely Hazardous Substance (EHS) fcu? [ | TCP I—I NU
* "YE8* Isl El 13 Name:
If "NO* Is the chemical stored In amounts greater
than 10.000 bs? HYESDNO
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX.
ON
SUE
540
AVO.
ON
SITE
2 70 pounds
CuFtBTP
Galons
(uaa actual quanUUee)
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTH(8)
12 3 4 ®(J)
10 ft 12
MONTHS
(Cjrde al thai Apply)
a><b(§>
ALLMC
STORAGE INFORMATION
(Non-Confldentlal)
Storage Locations
Finished Product Storage
tanks , West of office
rfETrENVtriTPW
Statement about how this chemical is used:
Sold as finished product
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS: TRADE SECRET:
CAS Numbar:
it/A - - _ Percent ol Mixture: 9 9.9%
Mixture of Aromatic &
inQredlent Name: Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
CAS Number:
Percent ol Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
CAS Number:
Ingredient Name:
Percent of Mixture: %
CAS Number:
Percent of Mixture:
tngiedlent Name:
CAS Number:
Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
HAZARD-CLASSES
Q Aerosol Products
O Blasting Agent
O Carcinogen
O Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Gas
• Hazardous Waste
• Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Other Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Peatlckle
• Pyropliortc
D Radioactive
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
O Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
ELAM MABL E LC 0 M B U ST1BL EJJ QUIDS:
fjjpiss 1A Q Class It
B Class IB Q Class III A
Class 1C • Class HIB
LIQUlElEDJ,EinQLEUM_QAS(LPQ.Lfl:GAt3)
O LPQ in BLDGS -not accession lo pobllc
• LPG In BLDGS -accessble to the public
In t-LB containers
LPQ In pubic assembry buildings.
LPQ at construction silos.
LPG outside
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablKfy NOTE: °-4
Rmtlna
In tx>»
Health Reactivity
Special Hazards
OX COR RAD
(Circle al thai Apply)
fWa Chamlc»l Inventory rieporl Form moat a lha reporting retirement« ot 6.A.R.A. THIa III, Tier It Reporllno Form and the Unllorm Fife Code. Page 2 of
J"""!!"""*j
nM uruii.^ciiiOU From: JAN. t, to: DEC. 31. _H11. 6ARA FORM I 002 Iw. t-M
FACILITY NAME: uestec Petroleum. Inc. {SLC Plant)
CHEMICAL DESCRIPTION
Read ALL Imlrucdoni before complal/nrj form
CAS NUMBER: mixture
PRODUCT OR
(LABEL) NAME: L na d ed regular Gasoline
t'^^njWlJUILN
• 0 • • •
Solid UqvikJ Gas Pure Mix
ClMCft ml
TOOinW/W
j X| Innwljta (acuta)
[ j D«UT** (ohconfc)
la tiht product or any ol Its ingredients on the SARA
Extramefy Itazardoua Subsume* (EHS) est?
H*YE8*tstEHS Name:
PYESBNO
BLDQ (Numbor Of Address): 1710 West 2600 S. WoodsCross, UT
INVENTORY AMOUNTS
MAX. AVO.
ON ON
SITE SUE
12 0 2 1 0 Pounds
Cu.FLBTP
Onions
(u*e kdusl quanlMM)
STORAGE INFORMATION
(Non-Coofldentlal)
Storage Locations
Finished Product Storage
tanks West of office
kWntiiTL^iu£iL?.£;u.
It "NO" Is be chemical stored In amounts greater
ban 10.000 bs? • YESDNOl
PEAK INVENTORY
MONTHS)
1 2 3 4 (6){jp
ALLMONTH8
(Circle a» that Apply)
iCQl^PACER3Rr^CTX)NS
Stalernent about how this chemical la used:
Ga sol i re Sales
CHEMICAL INGREDIENTS: TRADE SECRET:
CAS Number:
N./A . -__ Percent ol Mixture: 99.9%
Mixture of Aromatic & Aliphatic
ingredient Name: Hydrocarbons
CAS Number:
Percent ol Mixture: %
Ingredient Name:
CAS Number:
Ingredient Name:
Percent of Mixture:
CAS Nurnb«r:
Percent of Mixture:
Ingredient Name:
CAS Numbar:
IrvgrecHent Name:
Percent of Mixture:
HAZARD CLASSES
O Aerosol Products
• Blasting Agent
• Carcinogen
• Corrosive pH
• Cryogenic
• Explosive
• Flammable Gas
• Hazardous WftBte
O Highly Toxic
• Infectious Agents
• Organic Peroxide
• Other Health Hazard
• Oxidizer
• Pesticide
• PyroptKxlc
O Radloactlvo
• Toxic
• Unstable (Reactive)
• Water-Reactive
TYPE OF HAZARD(S)
FLAMUABLEiCQMDUSTlBLE LIQUIDS:
FJ Class 1A Q Class II
rT Class IB
• Class 1C B Class I11A
Class 1MB
LIQLUOEDJrJilBJaL
• LPQ In BLDGS -not accessble to public
0 LPQ In BLDGS-accessble lo the public
In l-LB containers
LPQ In public assembly buHdIngs.
LPQ al construction sites.
LPQ outside
N.F.P.A. 704 HAZARD RATING
FlammablHty NOTE:'1*"™ fr4
HUna \i
La . ^
Health Reactlvtty
Special Hazards
-W- OX COR RAD
(Ckcta al bal Apply)
This Crvsmkal Inventory Repott Form rn»*te the reporting requirement* of 8.A.R.A. Title ill, Tier It Reporting Form and the Uniform Fire Code. Page 1 of 13
•I'
is
ill
TV!
UTAH STATLrTES R£X)ilTJ£E KKTJNG IN A COi^SMOUOUS PfcACE NEAJROTS.
PRJSSUEE VESSEL §{
THE E-JDiUSTRIAL <X>MMI5tCN OF UTAH *§j
CERTXFiCATE OF PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECTION «ji
AND 'j.
FEB MIT TO OPERATE VESSEL
UTAil STATE NO, U\-30/h
cieseribcd vessel was inspected by
OA.
(Agency)
saci fonad soitnbfc fof i . > pressure rim to
(date)
. peuods per
or
rc reek This Permit fisjsrss exceed
Name of i
Location I Vessel ,Jfr&feft
Sy.
VtsBd laspctSCf
ANY WELDJ.NO MUST BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UTAH'S BOft.ES
WSESSUiE VESSEL SULES AND J^TJLATIONS.
11
6».
escwd
PRESSORS VESSEL jj
tax iw>usmrAL COMMISION OF UTAH f
CERTIFICATE OF PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECTION X
AND ;
fKKMIT TO OPERATE VESSEL i
So,
tesaSxtf vessel *as inspeOBti by
px&me opt 1
— pouwi pavpoare inch. Tins ftaoift Expires
* ^^^^
VcSS8{
^ WELOWG MUST BE DOME By ACCOS13A?*CE WfTH VTAB*
PRESSURE VESSEL KULES AND ROTATIONS
jiaspeoor
*<4
APPENDIX I
July 2004 Groundwater Sampling Laboratory Results
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ENVlRONM&fTAL SPECIALISTS
WASATCH GEQTECHNICAL, INC.
SOILS AND FOUNDATION SVG/NEERS
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM (dim
LAB*:
PROJECT NUMBER: fift(-^2.
SAMPLER: fljJU^^ Q^Ao^A ANALYSES REQUESTED
CEHTIRCATION = QQ^j
SITE LOCATION: it
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Data Time
(pa
Media Amount
O 1*
3*
(0
at
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS fi^ecca. <?Tuia^Ui-- -g«~> T/W^ /k<g-
Reiinouished By:
1 ^•^LeggsS^T^^o^-
Date/Time Received By: Date/Time
Page
2410 WEST CALIFORNIA AVENUE • SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84104 • PHONE (SOI) 972-8400 • FAX [phone]
WEB SITE: \mM.\mspfch^urwrmmMM.cam • E-MAIL: wat%wasatch^n\nmivnantBLci3m
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
i
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client Wasatch Environrnental
Collected- My 12,2004
Received; July 12,2004
Analysis Requested: TPHby SW8015B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-03B
Field Sample ID: B-1
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analytical Results
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed: My 13,2004
Extracted- My 13,2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UT Mod.
Units = mg/L
Final Dilution Factor 1
Compound
Sun-. 4-Bromofluorobenzeae
Reporting
Timir
48-150
Analytical
Result
53.1 •/.
[phone]
•Toll Free [phone]
™ Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28) 0.50 <0.50
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Released by:
Laboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 14, 2004
Page 3 of 21
Ail analysis applicable to the CWA, S DWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information 13 located on the attached Crjun-of-CusSody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Prrvrteges of subsequent use of the name ot this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of thts report for any purpose other then for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone] toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
;-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client Wasatch. Environmental
Collected: July 12,2004
Received: July 12,2004
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-03A
Field Sample ID: B-1
Site ID: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Analyzed: July 12,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
LMts= jig/L
Compound
Surr. l,2-DicHoroetharie-d4
Sum 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Sum Dibromotruoromethane
Sun: Tohaene-d8
DicMorodiflriorometbarie
Chloromelnane
Vinyl chloride
Bromcrmefharip
CUoroetnane
TricMcapfluCTxmemane
1, l-DicMcroerhene
1,1 ,2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trMuoroethane
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene chloride
trans 1,2-DicMoroethene
Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,1 -DicMoroethane
cis 1^-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
Chloroform
1,1,1-TricMorciethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
12-Dichloroethane
Reporting IJmit
81-120
85-115
85-115
85-115
2.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2-0
10
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Analytical
Result
87.4 %
106 %
93.4 %
108 %
<2.0
<3.0
<1.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
Report Date: July 14,2004 Page 12 of 21
Afl analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chain-of-Custody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of 1he addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection ttie re-pubBcation of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except tor the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone]
•Toll Free [phone]
S Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L61163-03A
Field Sample ID: B-1
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081 -2
Analyzed: July 12, 2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
TrichkiroeuTene
Memylcyctohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
BrornodicUoromethane
cis 1,3-Didiloropropene
4-Memyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
trans 1,3-DicMoroproperie
1,1,2-TricMoroethane
Tetrachloroethene
2-Hexanone
Dibromcchlorometrjane
1.2- DiTDromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethyfljenzene
Xylenes, Total
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbenzene
1,1 ,2,2-TetracUoroethane
1.3- Dicblorobenzene
1.4- Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ^-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
TPHC6toC10(GRO)
Reporting Limit
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
20
Analytical
Result
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
490
The pH of the sample was >2. Analysis was performed within 7 day holding time.
Released by: O^^T^g^—
Laboratory Supervisor
Report Date: July 14,2004 Page 13 of 21
All analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to MELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached ChairvofCustody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this comrarry or any meniber of its staff, or reproducSk^
I with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connecto with the re-ptifjScation be granted only
1 on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due cerfofiriare» of inspects
I
I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
H [phone]
•Toll Free [phone]
1 Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client Wasatch F^vkcinmerjral
CoUected: My 12,2004
Received: My 12, 2004
Analysis Requested: TPH by SW8015B
Lab Sample ID: L6T163-02B
Field Sample ID: B-2
Site JD: Cowboy Oil / 1081 -2
Analytical Results
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed: My 13,2004
Extracted: My 13, 2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UT Mod.
Units = mg/L
Final Dilution Factor 1
Compound
Sun: 4-Bromofluorobeazene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28)
Reporting
T .if rut
48-150
0.50
Analytical
Result
61.8 %
63
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Released by:
Laboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 14,2004
Page 2 of 21
Al analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chain-of-Custody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sate of any product or process, or in connection with the repuMcation of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wiB be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact Rebecca Studenka
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Chent Wasatch Envircaimental
Collected July 12, 2004
Received: July 12,2004
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Lab Sample ED: L61163-02A
Field Sample ID: B-2
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081 -2
Analyzed: July 12, 2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Surn l,2-ttcMoroethaiie-d4
Sum 4-Bromoiruorobenzene
Sum Dibroinoiruoromethane
Sum Toluene-d8
Dir.h 1 nrrvri fti inmmerhane
Chlorometbane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
CUoroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1 -DicMorccthene
1,1,2-Tricruoro-1 ^-triflaoacoetibane
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene chloride
trans 1,2-DicMoroethene
Methyl tot-butyl ether
1,1-DicUoroemane
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone
Chloroform
1,1,1 -TricMoroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1 j2-DicMorc«ubanc
Reporting limit
81-120
85-115
85-115
85-115
2.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Analytical
Result
85.2 %
106 %
92.0 %
108 %
<2.0
<3.0
< 1.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
61
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
8.2
<2.0
Report Date: July 14, 2004 page 10 of 21
AH analysts applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chairv-of-CustDdy. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according ID the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone]
f oil Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample LD: L61163-02A
Field Sample 3D: B-2
Site ID: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Analyzed: July 12, 2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Tricnloroetrjene
Memylcyclohexane
1.2- DicMGrorjropane
BromodicMorometriane
cis 1,3-DicMoropropene
4-Memyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
trans l^-DicHoropropene
1,1^-Trichloroethane
TetracMoroethene
2-Hexanone
Dibromfjcnlorornetbane
1^-Dibromoethane
CMorobenzene
EthyJbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbenzene
1,1 ,2,2-TetxacMorc^thane
1.3- Dichlorobenzene
1.4- Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-DicMcnx>berrzene
l,2-Dibromc>-3-cMoropropane
1,2,4-TricUorobenzene
Naphthalene
TPH C6 to C10 (GRO)
RepCCtuTg T Ttrnt
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
20
Analytical
Result
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
340
Released by: <=^^Cs^i
Laboratory Supervisor
Report Date: Jury 14, 2004 Page 11 of 21
AS analysis applicable to the CWA. SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Crrain-oJ-Custody. This
report is provided for tne exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis m good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone]
• Toll Free [phone]
1 Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client Wasatch Ehviiormierjial
Collected: July 12, 2004
Received: July 12,2004
Analysis Requested: TPHby SW8015B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-04B
Field Sample ID: B-3
Site JD: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Analytical Results
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed July 13,2004
Extracted: July 13,2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UT Mod.
Units = mg/L
Final Dilution Factor 1
Compound
Sum 4-Bromofiuoroberizene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28)
Repealing
Timit
48-150
0.50
Analytical
Result
76.9 %
8.1
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Released by:
Laborati aboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 14, 2004
Page 4 of 21
All analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chaovof-Custody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-pubflcatlon of this report tor any purpose cither than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of Inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact Rebecca Studenka
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone] roll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client Wasatch Environmental
Collected; July 12,2004
Received; July 12,2004
Analysis Requested; 8260B/5030B
Lab Sample LD: L61163-04A
Field Sample JD: B-3
Site 3D: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Analyzed: July 12,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAJL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Sum 1 ^-DicMoroethane-d4
Sum 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Sum JJibrcrmofluoro
Sum Toluene-d8
DicMorocbfiuoirjrnem
Cblorornethane
Vinyl cMoride
Bromometfaane
CMoroelhane
TncMoroflucrcnnethai^
1.1-Dichloroethene
1,1 ,2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trMuoroethane
Acetone
Carbon aisulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene chloride
trans O-Dichloroethene
Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,1 -EhcMorcrethane
cis l^-3DicMoroethene
2-Butanone
Chloroform
1,1,1-TricMoroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-lXcUorodriarte
Repeating Limit
81-120
85-115
85-115
85-115
2.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Analytical
Result
85.9 %
105 %
91.4 %
108 %
<2.0
<3.0
< 1.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
4.2
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<2.0
2.7
<2.0
190
<2.0
Repon Date: July 14,2004 page 14 0f 21
All analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Criajrwrf-Custody. The
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges ot subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of Its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sate of any product or process, or in connection with rh» re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee wi» be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone]
loll Free [phone]
I Fax [phone]
-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L61163-04A
Field Sample ID: B-3
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analyzed: July 12, 2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Tricnbroethene
MemyLcyclohexane
1.2-DicHoropropane
Bromc<ti.chlorr)mediane
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
4-Memyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
trans 1,3 -Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-TricMoroethane
TetracMoroetbene
2-Hexanone
DibromocMoromethan^
1 ,2-Dirxomoethane
Chlcarobenzene
Efhyibenzene
Xylenes, Total
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbenzene
1,1,2,2-TetracUorcrethane
1.3- DicMorobenzene
1.4- DicMorobenzene
1,2-DicMorobenzene
1 ^-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-TricMorobenzene
Naphthalene
TPH C6 to C10 (GRO)
Repeating limit
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
20
Analytical
Result
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
3.0
2.1
<2.0
<2.0
2.1
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
14
290
Released by:
Laboratory Supervisor
Report Date: July 14,2004 Page 15 of21
All analysts applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chain-otCustody. This
report is provided tor the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose cither than tor the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
u [phone]
•roll Free [phone]
™ Fax [phone]
s-mail: [e-mail]
Chart: Wasatch Bnvironm
Collected July 12,2004
Received- July 12,2004
Analysis Requested TPH by SW8015B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-06B
Field Sample 3D: B-7
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analytical Results
Contact Rebecca Stiidenka
Analyzed July 13,2004
Extracted July 13,2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UT Mod.
Units = mg/L
Final 33ilution Factor: 1
Compound
Sum 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28)
Repealing
Limit
48-150
0.50
Analytical
Result
763 %
1.9
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Released by:
Laboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 14,2004
Page 6 of 21
AM analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling informaSon is located on the attached Chairv<xf-Ciistody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion of sale of any product or process, or in connection with the republication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibflity except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the roles of the trade and of science.
A ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact Rebecca Studenka
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
1
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone]
•Toll Free [phone]
1 Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client Wasatch Envrrorimenral
Collected July 12,2004
Received- July 12, 2004
Analysis Recfuested 8260B/5030B
Lab Sample JD: L61163-06A
Field Sample ID: B-7
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analyzed July 12, 2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Sum l^-DicMoroethane-d4
Sum 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Sum Dibrcnioilucirome
Sum Toluene-dS
CUorcniethane
Vinyl chloride
Brcmomethane
CMorcethane
TricMorofluaromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1^-TricMoro-l^-trifluoroetharie
Acetone
Carbon cusulfide
Methyl Acetate
Merhylene chloride
trans 12-Dichloroemene
Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,1 -Dichlorcrethane
cis 1,2-Dichtoroethene
2-Buranone
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1^-Dittl6f6g1hane
Reporting Limit
81-120
85-115
85-115
85-115
2.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Analytical
Result
84.8 %
106 %
92.4 %
109 %
<2.0
<3.0
< 1.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
Report Date: My 14,2004 Page 18 of 21
Afl analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information Is located on Ihe attached Cliaiivof-Custody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the republication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone]
f oil Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
s-mail: await®awal-Labs.corn
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L61163-06A
Field Sample ID: B-7
Site ID: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Arjalyzed; July 12,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
TricMoroethene
Memylcyctahexane
1,2-DicMoropropane
Brcmc<ricUcrame^
cis 13-DicMoropropene
4-Metnyi-2-pentanone
Toluene
trans 1,3-Dicnloropropene
1,1,2-TricMOToethane
TetracMoroethene
2-Hexanone
I^ibromocblorometnarie
1.2- Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
FJhylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbcnzene
1,1,2,2-TetracWoroethane
1.3- DicMoroberizerie
1.4- Dicruorobenzene
1^-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dtbromo-3-cnloropropane
1,2,4-TricMorobenzene
Naphthalene
TPH C6 to C10 (GRO)
Reporting limit
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
20
Analytical
Result
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<20
Released by:
Laboratory Supervisor
Report Date: July 14, 2004 Page 19 of 21
All analysts appficabta to tha CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Oiati-of^ustody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Sait Lake City, Utah
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client Wasatch Environmental
Collected: My 12,2004
Received: My 12,2004
Analysis Requested- TPHby SW8015B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-07B
Field Sample ID: B-9
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analytical Results
Contact Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed: My 13,2004
Extracted My 13,2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UT Mod.
Units = mg/L
Final Dilution Factor 1
Compoimn
Surn 4-Bror/Mfluorobenzene
Reporting
T jrmt
48-150
Analytical
Result
65.1 %
r [phone]
oil Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28) 0.50 3.4
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Released by:
Laboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 14, 2004
Page 7 of 21
AH analysts applicable to the CWA SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Cham-of-C jstocry This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the republication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of saence.
A
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
463 West 3600 Sou*
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
t [phone]
oil Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
i-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client Wasatch Envircmrnenral
Couected: July 12,2004
Received: July 12, 2004
Analysis Reqiiested: 8260B/5030B
Lab Sample 3D: L61163-07A
Field Sample 3D: B-9
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analyzed: July 13,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Sum 12-DicWcrcrethane-d4
Sum 4-Bromonuorobenzene
Sum Dibromoflucaramethane
Sum Toluene-d8
DicMaroctifhioromethane
CMoiomethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomeihane
CMorcethane
Tridilorofluoromethane
1.1-DicMoroethene
1,1 ,2-TricMoro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene chloride
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,1 -DicMoroethane
cis 1,2-DicHoroethene
2-Butanone
Chloroform
1,1,1-TricMoroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-DicMorc^thane
Repeating limit
81-120
85-115
85-115
85-115
2.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Analytical
33esult
93.5 %
105 %
97.5 %
107 %
<2.0
<3.0
1.5
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
11
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
73
<2.0
Report Date: July 14,2004 pagc ?0 of 21
All analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chain-of-Custody This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staft, or reproducnon of this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-pubUcation of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone] r oll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: awal@awal-Labs-com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L61163-07A
Field Sample ID: B-9
Sire ID: Cowboy Oil/1081-2
Analyzed: July 13,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Trichloroethene
Memylcyddaexane
12-DicMoropropane
Brnmoc^Moromstbsiie
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1 ^-TricMoroethane
TetracMoroetnene
2-Hexanone
DLbrcuTiocWorom
1^-Dibromoethane
CMcorobenzene
Erbylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylberrzene
1,1,2,2-TeuacWoroethane
1,3-DicMorobenzene
1 ,+Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-cnloropropane
1,2,+Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
TPH C6 to C10 (GRO)
Reporting I irmt
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
20
Analytical
Result
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<20
The pH of the sample was >2. Analysis was performed within 7 day holding time.
Released by:
aboratory Supervisor
Report Date: July 14,2004 Page 21 of 21
All analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chairvof-Custoay This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
»nth the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or ri connection wfth the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysts in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
I
1
1
I
I
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
Client: Wa^t^n FrrvTrrwnftrtra]
Collected: My 12,2004
Received: My 12,2004
Aoalysis Recniested: TPH by SW8015B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-0 IB
Field Sample ID: B-14a
Site JJD: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analytical Results
Contact Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed: My 13,2004
Extracted- My 13,2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UT Mod.
t [phone]
oli Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
I
I
I
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Units = mg/L
Final Dilution Factor. 1
Compound
Sun; 4-Brorxwfluoroben2ene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28)
Reporting
T trrtfr"
48-150
030
Analytical
Result
61.D %
13
Laboratory Supervisor Report Date: Jury 14,2004
Page 1 of 21
AS analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance ta NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located cm the attached ChaJrHrfOustody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee, Prhfliages of subsequent use tne narne of
wifli the advertisement, promotion or sate of arry product or process, cir in cormec^
oncorttact This company accepts no respcrafcffity except for the due perfo^
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
463 West 3600 South
Sate Lake City, Utah
84115
t [phone]
oil Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client: Wasatch Environmental
Collected: July 12,2004
Received: July 12,2004
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-01A
Field Sample ID: B-14a
Site ID: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Analyzed: July 12, 2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Sum l,2-Dichloroemane-d4
Sum +Bromonuorobenzene
Sum L^ramoQuoromethmie
Sum Toluene-dS
Dif^lnrfvlifhioiTTTnftrharift
CMoromethane
Vinyl cMctide
Bromomethane
CMoroetbane
Trichloroftuorcmeuia^
1,1 -DicMciroeThene
1,1 ,2-Tricnloro-1 ^^-trinuoroethane
Acetone
Carrxm disulfide
Mediyl Acetate
Methylene chloride
trans 1^-DicWoroethene
Methyl tert-butyl ether
1.1- DicMoroethane
cis 1,2-DicMoroemene
2-Butanone
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Cyclobexane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-LXchlorc«&ane
Rerx3rting limit
81-120
85-115
85-115
85-115
2.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0-
2.0
2.0
Analytical
Result
86.1 %
107 %
92.2 %
110 %
<2.0
<3.0
<1.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
9.f>
<2.0
<2.0
<10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
Report Date: July 14,2004 page 8 of 21
AS analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling, information is located on the attached Chain-ot-Custody. This
report is provided for the exclusive use erf the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in oonnectkin with the re-puok^on of this report for ar^
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for toe due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rotes of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone] r oll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L61163-01A
Field Sample ID: B-14a
Site ID: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Analyzed: July 12,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Ti3cblori>etbene
MeAyicyclonexane
1.2- DicMoropropane
BromocMudroniethane
cis 1,3-DicMoropropene
4-Memyl-2-penranone
Toluene
trans 13-DicMoropropene
1,1^-TiicMoroetnane
TetracMcroemene
2-Hexanone
Dibromochloromethane
12-Dibromoetbane
Qilorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbeazene
1,1 ,2,2-TetracMoroethane
1.3-DicMorobenzene
1.4-DicMorobenzene
1^-DicMorobenzene
l,2-Dibromo-3-cnloropropane
1 A+TricMorobenzene
Naphthalene
TPH C6 to C10 (GRO)
Reporting .Omit
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
20
Analytical
Result
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<20
Released by:
laboratory Supervisor
Report Date: July 14, 2004 page 9 0f 21
Al anafysls applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are perfbnned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located c<i the attached Oiatrwf-^^ This
report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges 0/subsequent use of the name of this conirjany or arry mentor or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-pubUcatton of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
r [phone]
oil Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client Wasatch Fnviroimjerjlal
Collected: July 12, 2004
Received: July 12, 2004
Analysis Requested: TPH by SW8015B
Lab Sample LD: L61163-05B
Field Sample ID: B-16
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analytical Results
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed: July 13, 2004
Extracted July 13,2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UT Mod.
Units = mg/L
Final Dilution Factor 1
Compound
Surn 4-Bromofluorobeazeiic
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28)
Reporting
limit
48-150
030
Analytical
Result
55.6 %
0.53
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Released by: =2,
aboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 14,2004
Page 5 of 21
All analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Cnahvpf-Custody. This
report is provided tor the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the republication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good tarth and according to the rutea of the trade and of science.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact Rebecca Studenka
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
I
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
[phone] r oll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client Wasatch Envircinnaental
Collected Jury 12,2004
Received: Jury 12,2004
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Lab Sample ID: L61163-05A
Field Sample JD: B-16
Site LD: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2
Analyzed: July 12,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
Sum 12-Dichloroeth2ne-d4
Sum 4-Bronionuorobenzene
Sum Dibromoflucnmiethanft
Sum Toluene-d8
Dkhlorodifiuorrmiemane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomemane
Chloroethane
THchlomfhinmrnftrhane
1.1-DicMoroethene
l,l^-TricMorcHl^^-trij3uoroetbnne
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene chloride
trans 1 .2-Diduoroethene
Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,1 -DicMoroethane
cis 1 ,2-DkMoroethene
2-Butanone
Chloroform
1,1,1-TricMoroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1.2-DicMorc^thane
Reporting Limit
81-120
85-115
85-115
85-115
2.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Analytical
Result
87.1 %
106 %
93.7 %
109 %
<2.0
<3.0
<1.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
< 10
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
Report Date: July 14, 2004 f>age 16 of 21
All analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocol*. Pertinent sampling IrrtormaSon is located on the attached Chairwif^Custody. This
report is provided forthe exdusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction erf this report in connection
with the advertisement promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
I
1
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
t [phone]
oil Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
;-mail: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L61163-05A
Field Sample ID: B-16
Site ED: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Analyzed: July 12,2004
Analytical Results VOCs (AWAL+TPPH) by GC/MS 8260B
Units = ug/L
Compound
TricAlproethene
Memylcydchexane
1 ,2-DicUoropropane
BrcmodcMcromethane
cis 13-Dicbloropropene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-TricMoroethane
TetracMoroetbene
2-Hexanone
DibromcKMcaometnane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
CMorobenzene
Ethyibenzene
Xylenes, Total
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbenzene
1,1,2,2-TetracMoroethane
1,3-Dicnlorobenzene
1 ,+Dichlorobenzene
12-Dichlorobenzene
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,+TricMorobenzene
Naphthalene
TPHC6toC10(GRO)
Reporting limit
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
20
Analytical
Result
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<20
Released by:
Laboratory Supervisor
Report Date: My 14, 2004 Page 17 of 21
All analysis appficable ID the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling irrformaflon is located on the attached Chain-ofOustody. This
report is provided for the exdusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of Its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
with the adverbsernent promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only
on contact This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to .the rules of the trade and of science.
mwM asa^i mm mm ~ mm ~' :m:2 SH
American West Analytical Labs
WORK ORDER Summary
Client ID: WAS580
rroject: Cowboy Oil /1081-2
Comments: PA Rush3 Day Rush
QC Level: QC 1 RUSH
12-M-04
Work Order L61163
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection Dnte Date Received Date Due Matrix Test Code Storage
L61I63-01A
L61163-01B
L61163-02A
L61I63-02B
L61163-03A
L61I63-03B
L61163-04A
L61163-04B
L61163-05A
L61163-05B
L61163-06A
L61163-06B
L61163-07A
L61163-07B
B-14a
B-2
B-1
B-3
B-16
B-7
B-9
7/12/2004 10:00:00 AM 7/12/2004
7/12/2004 10:30:00 AM
7/12/2004 11:00:00 AM
7/12/2004 11:45:00 AM
7/12/2004 12:10:00 PM
7/12/2004 12:30:00 PM
7/12/2004 1:45:00 PM
7/15/2004 Aqueous 8260-W-AWAL+
7/15/2004 8015-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8015prep-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8260-W-AWAL+
7/15/2004 8015-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8015prep-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8260-W-AWAL+
7/15/2004 8015-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8015prep-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8260-W-AWAL+
7/15/2004 8015-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8015prep-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8260-W-AWAL+
7/15/2004 8015-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8015prep-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8260-W-AWAL+
7/15/2004 8015-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8015prep-W-TPH
7/15/2004 8260-W-AWAL+
7/15/2004 8015-W-TPH
7/15/2004 80l5prep-W-TPH
VOCFridge 3
tph 2
tph
VOCFridge 3
tph 2
tph
VOCFridge 3
tph 2
tph
VOCFridge 3
tph 2
tph
VOCFridge 3
tph 2
tph
VOCFridge 3
tph 2
tph €T"
VOCFridge 3 ~~
tph 2 ^
tph
II
III Page f Of 7
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
WASATCH GEOTECHWCAL, INC.
SOILS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERS
I
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM
PROJECT NUMBER: //) /- JXrf-
SAMPLEfl: /j^t^^
LAS#: Oflt-
ANALYSES REQUESTED
I
I
i
CERT1RCAT10N #: ~(
SITE LOCATION
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
=1
Data Time Media Amount
(•fed
I
JtL 3d
SPECIAL uMSTRUCnONS:
Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: Date/Time
7-
Page of
2410 '/WEST CALIFORNIA A VENUE • L4KE C;TY, t/TAH 84704 • PHOWE [phone] • FAX [phone]
VfES S/TE; www.wa^ch-anvirr&nutntal.mm • E-UAIL: weffiwaaalch-arnriranmantai^oin
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
J463 West 3600 South
| Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
1
[phone]
Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
ail; [e-mail] I
Client; Wasatch Environmental
Collected: July 12, 2004
Received: July 13, 2004
Analysis Requested: TPH by SW8015B
Lab Sample ID: L61184-01A
Field Sample ID: B-4
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2A
Analytical Results
Units =mg/L
Final Dilution Factor: 10
Compound
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - C10-28)
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed: July 13, 2004
Extracted: July 13, 2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UTMod.
Reporting Analytical
Limit Result
48-150 1,640% S
750 420,000
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
The sample was multiphasic. Per client request, only the top oil layer was analyzed.
Based on chromatographic evidence, it appears the contamination is from Gasoline Range Organics and
unweathered Diesel.
S - High surrogate recovery attributed to TPH interference. The method is in control as indicated by the
MB & LCS.
Reieased by:
Laboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 15,2004
Page 1 of 2
1analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chain-of-Custody. This
ort is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
Chromatogram
S3n^Narre:U51T8WlAiaX SampteftOOl Page 1 of 1
FieNama : cWM35gQ2Cuaw
Date: 07/15O4 03373 AM AM
Method : T>roofiri9rJcfc07/13O40Sr^16P^
S^Tto:QI»mri End Trne ; 1620 min Low Point: -3450 mV Hgh Point: 100O00mV
ScateFaax 0.0 Plot Offeet -345D mV Plot Spate 103*5 mV
933
900
833
803
750
7C0
W
833
593
333
5 450
433
353
333
20
233
153
103
33
_ I
Ill llil 111 lllljl!lljllll|llll|ll
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
ORGAMC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
1463 West 3600 South
J Salt Lake City, Utah
84115
I
Client: Wasatch Environmentai
Collected: July 12, 2004
Received: July 13, 2004
Analysis Requested: TPH by SW8015B
Lab Sample ED: L61184-02A
Field Sample ID: Sparge Well
Site ID: Cowboy Oil / 1081-2A
Analytical Results
Units =mg/L
Final Dilution Factor: 10
Compound
SUIT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Contact: Rebecca Studenka
Analyzed: July 13, 2004
Extracted: July 13, 2004
TPH-DRO-8015B/UTMod.
Reporting Analytical
Limit Result
48-150 98.0%
[phone]
Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
aii: [e-mail]
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (DRO - CI0-28) 750 440,000
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
The sample was multiphasic. Per client request, only the top oil layer was analyzed.
Based on chromatographic evidence, it appears the contamination is from 25% weathered Diesel.
Released by
Laboratory Supervisor Report Date: July 15,2004
Page 2 of 2
analysis applicable to the CWA, SDWA and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached Chain-of-Custody. This
sort is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection
1 Chromatogram
arrieN&T»:L6118«EA10X Sampte#:C01 Paga1of1
Wame ; tr#a93SgQ21.raw
107/1504 0937:41 AM AM
4 : TiTBoflrse(&iT07/13Wra4aS6PMPM
hnerOflOn* End Tme : 1633 mn Lew Port: 33.73 mV hs^PdriMOOOOOrnV
Facrx OO Pbt Ofeet 33.73 mV PttScate 1033.7 mV
933—
3
T
d --
I
l
CD
rT[TTlT|TnT]iTTTTnT^
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
American West Analytical Labs
WORK ORDER Summary
Client ID: WAS580
Project: Cowboy Oil /1081-2A
Comments: 2 Day Rush. Client wants Product ID reported.
14-M-04
Work Order L61184
QC Level: QC 1
m T
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection Date Date Received Date Due Matrix Test Code Storage
L6L184-01A
L61184-02A
B-4
Sparge Well
7/12/2004 1:20:00 PM 7/13/2004
7/12/2004 2:30:00 PM
7/15/2004 Miscellaneous 8015-W-TPH hall/rush
7/15/2004 80 ISprep- W-TPH hall/rush
7/I5/20O4 8015-W-TPH hall/rush
7/15/2004 8015prcp-W-TPH hall/rush
1 ShippM wifeid m*tdi
horn: v—-—
Hoin: ( '
3 Tmw*ss*
< HacitvX IroktrVUttot
<27
« RKIIVM WWttfl
Page 7" of f
APPENDIX J
Environmental Professional Qualifications
Wasatch Environmental, Inc
A WASATCH
fit ,<>»<» WKMT*-.
Julie H. Kilgore, Principal
Environmental Manager
Education
• B.S. Environmental Management, Inter*scipUnary (Summa Cum Laude), Westminster
• M.B.A. University of Utah
Certifications
• Utah Certified Soil and Ground Water Sampler #GS 0901
• OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Materials Operation
• OSHA 8-Hour Hazardous Materials Supervisor
• Certified Asbestos Inspector and Management Planner
Committees
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) - Ms. Kilgore currently chairs the ASTM E1527
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Task Force and is vice-chair of the ASTM Committee E50.02,
Commercial Real Estate Transactions.
• Environmental Protection Agency Federal Advisory Committee - Ms. Kilgore has been appointed as a
negotiating member of the EPA Federal Advisory Committee for developing the "All Appropriate
Inquiry" standard practice as commissioned by Congress in the 2002 Brownfields legislation.
• Chamber of Commerce Environmental Affairs Committee - Ms. Kilgore is a member of the Salt Lake
Chamber of Commerce Environmental Affairs Committee focused on increased support and education
for Brownfields Redevelopment.
Experience
Ms. Kilgore has over 15 years experience in management of environmental projects. Her project management
and field experience includes: Phase I environmental site assessments, subsurface investigations, remedial
investigation, and remedial installations. Ms. Kilgore has been directly involved in hundreds of Phase I, II, and
III Site Assessments/Audits and is currently an instructor for the ASTM national Phase I ESA training course.
Environmental Site Assessments/Audits
Ms. Kilgore implemented Wasatch's current Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
program for real estate transactions and PRP determinations. Ms. Kilgore has lectured for several
professional organizations and participated in national conference panel presentations regarding the Phase I
Environmental Assessments/Audits including:
• Environmental Bankers Association, 2004 National Conference
• EPA Brownfields 2003 Conference, Portland, Oregon;
• Engineers' Society of Western Pennsylvania, 2003 Business of Brownfields Conference, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
• EPA Brownfields 2002 Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina;
• 1994 Phase I Environmental Assessment Seminar for Commercial Real Estate Professionals, Salt
Lake City;
• National Association of Real Estate Appraisers, 1991 National Appraisal Conference, Las Vegas
Nevada;
• American Society of Appraisers, Salt Lake City
Standards Development and Rulemaking
As the current chair of the National ASTM E1527/E1528 Phase I/Transaction Screen Task Force and is vice-
*mgm*r w • sr^.^MS" i Environmental Assessment Services
;si'^.^':i^c*('sL , _ .— ™ , ,
!
i
chair of the ASTM Committee E50.02, Commercial Real Estate Transactions, Ms. Kilgore directly participates
in the on-going development of the various standard practice and guidance documents related to
environmental assessments and commercial property transactions. Standard documents currently under
consideration within ASTM include asbestos and mold screenings for commercial property transactions.
As a result of Ms. Kilgore's role with ASTM, Wasatch Environmental was named to represent the
Environmental Professional category of stakeholders for the EPA negotiation rulemaking process for
developing "All Appropriate Inquiry" as commissioned by Congress in the Small Business Liability Relief and
Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2002.
Ms. Kilgore's involvement with the EPA rulemaking began in April 2003 and concluded in November 2003,
resulting in a draft EPA regulation for "All Appropriate Inquiry." Ms. Kilgore's direct involvement in
developing the ASTM 1527 provided EPA with unique insight into the process required to satisfy innocent
landowner, bona fide prospective purchaser, or contiguous property owner defense to CERCLA liability.
This EPA regulation for All Appropriate Inquiry is slated for promulgation in mid 2005. Once this regulation
becomes final, all purchasers of commercial property seeking to qualify for one of the landowner liability
protections will be required to meet the EPA standard. As the ASTM E1527 Task Force chair, Ms. Kilgore is
currently facilitating direct EPA participation as ASTM seeks to modify the E1527 to comply with the new EPA
regulation.
PUBLICATIONS
Kilgore, J., "All Appropriate StandardsBrownfields News, Vol. 1, March 2004
Environmental Assessment Services
Education
• B.S. Geological Engineering, University of Utah, 1977
• Graduate Studies, San Diego State University, 1978-79
• Principles of Ground Water Hydrology, National Water Well Association Short Course, 1989
• Underground Storage Tank Management, National Water Well Association Short Course, 1988
• Workshop on Applicable Regulations of USEPA and USDOT Regarding the Management of Hazardous
Wastes, Lion Technology Inc., 1990
Registration / Certification/ Accreditation
• Professional Engineer: Utah, Wyoming, California
• Registered Geotechnical Engineer: California
• OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations
Related Experience
Mr. Pennington is the founder and Principal Engineer of Wasatch Environmental, Inc. has been a
practicing environmental and geotechnical engineer for 25 years. His professional focus has been in the
areas of environmental assessment and remediation and soil groundwater engineering. Mr. Pennington
has been involved in over 500 environmental assessments and over 180 remedial actions.
Site Assessment and Environmental Engineering Experience
Mr. Pennington is experienced in responding to emergency situations where petroleum releases have
migrated through subsurface utility trenches or sewers, creating potential explosive hazards or vapor
accumulation problems including vapor accumulation in structures. The following are examples of this
experience;
• Steve and Walt's Service, Clearfield, Utah: Emergency response to the accumulation of petroleum
vapors inside an adjacent building. Response actions included development of a work plan.
Remediation system design for the excavation and repair of cracks in the concrete foundation wall of
the structure, and the installation of a soil vapor extraction system. In addition to this immediate
response same day the initial indoor vapor problem was reported. The implementation of the design
and work plan activities were successful in abating the vapor accumulation within 24-hours of
discovery.
• Mama Eddy's, St. George, Utah - design and installation of a horizontal trench soil vapor extraction
system to abate petroleum vapor accumulation in the basement of a restaurant.
• TDEM, Salt Lake City, Utah - Investigation and removal action for chromium impacted soil.
• Crossroads Market, Manila, Utah - designed and installed groundwater sparging/soil venting system
to remove petroleum hydrocarbons, which had impacted public water supply.
• Russ's Texaco, St. George, Utah: Emergency response to the identification of petroleum vapors
inside an elementary school adjacent to an operating service station. Response actions included
subsurface investigation of a large petroleum hydrocarbon plume, which migrated under the
elementary school.
These projects involved soil and groundwater impacted with gasoline, diesel, waste oil, heating oil,
refinery products and byproducts, and halogenated hydrocarbons. Soil remediation technologies utilized
include: aeration, land farming, in-situ and ex situ bioremediation, as well as proper landfill disposal.
Mr. Pennington has developed several innovative techniques utilizing in-well aeration, groundwater
sparging, bioventing, and horizontal vapor extraction, which have greatly enhanced the usefulness of
these technologies.
A WASATCH
Les H. Pennington, P.E.
President, Principal Engineer
A WASATCH Environmerstai Assessment Services
Other Projects Include:
• University of Utah- Sampling and closure of storage facility utilized for the storage of animal tissues
subjected to radiation studies.
• USDA Forest Service- Investigation and remedial alternatives for soil impacted with creosote and
pentachlorophenol (PCP).
• Utah Welders Supply, Salt Lake City, Utah- Investigation and remedial alternatives for soil and
groundwater impacted with <tichloroethene, tetrachlorethane, trichloroethene, and vinyl chloride.
• Keesler AFB, Mississippi- In-well aeration pilot study and full-scale remedial system
implementation. Project includes 32 aeration wells and 4 vapor extraction wells.
• Mullins, South Carolina- In-well aeration system consisting of 40 wells designed to treat PCA
contaminated confined aquifer. System design to treat source area and mitigate fringe migration.
• Harve de Grace, Maryland- In-well aeration pilot study for large TCE plume at a chemical
manufacturing plant.
• Denver, Colorado- Groundwater circulation well pilot study for free product recovery and in-well
aeration for enhancement of in situ demobilization and biodegradation of creosote at large wood
treatment plant.
• Castle AFB, California- In-well aeration pi lot study for treatment of TCE contaminated groundwater.
Subcontract with Jacobs Engineering.
• Savannah River Site, South Carolina- Pilot study for evaluation of recirculating well for removal of
chlorinated solvents.
• Kielce, Poland - In-well aeration pilot study for use of this technology at abandoned German and
Soviet facilities as well as industrial sites in Poland.
PUBLICATIONS
Schrauf, T., Sheehan, P. and L. Pennington, "Alternative Method of Groundwater Sparging for Petroleum
Hydrocarbon Remediation", Remediation, Vol. 4, No. 1, Winter 1993.
Environmentai Assessment Services
j
Rebecca Studenka, P.G.
Environmental Engineer/ Geologist
Education
• B.S. Geology, with a concentration in Hydrogeology, 1994
Registration / Certification / Accreditation
• 40 hour OSHA Basic Health and Safety/Hazardous Wastes, 1993, updated 1994-2002
• 8-hour OSHA Supervisor Training, 1995
• State of Utah UST Ground Water and Soil Sampler Certification, 2000
Related Experience
AAs. Studenka has been a practicing geologist for over eight years in the areas of hydrogeological and
remedial investigations, as well as, environmental assessments. AAs. Studenka has been involved in
numerous remedial/hydrogeological investigations, site assessments and groundwater monitoring
programs.
Site Assessment and Remediation Experience
AAs. Studenka is experienced in responding to situations in which petroleum releases have impacted
the soil and/or groundwater creating various potential hazards. The following are examples of this
experience;
• Sunshine Laudromat, Lansing, Michigan: Soil and groundwater investigation activities, as
well as, the installation of a soil vapor extraction system due to the release of PCE at a site.
• BASF, Wyandott, Michigan: Various soil and groundwater investigation activities to
determine impact at site due to numerous contaminant releases.
• Hi-Ball Crane, Lansing, Michigan: Soil investigative activities and supervision of soil removal
for abatement due to various releases of petroleum substances at the site.
• General Aviation, Capital City Airport, Lansing, Michigan: Investigative activities to
determine soil and groundwater impact due to a jet fuel release at the site. Remedial
activities included the supervision of the removal of impacted soil and groundwater at the
site.
• Fort Sheridan, Fort Sheridan, Illinois: Various soil and groundwater investigative activities
to determine impact at the site due to numerous contaminant releases.
• Pollard Landfill, Montrose, Michigan: Installation of various methane vapor extraction wells,
as well as, coordination of the methane vapor extractions from the wells.
Ms. Studenka has been involved with projects where soil and groundwater have been impacted with
gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, waste oil, heating oil and halogenated hydrocarbons. Soil remedial
technologies utilized include soil vapor extraction and proper Landfill disposal.
Underground Storage Tank Project Experience i
Ms. Studenka is experienced in underground storage tank investigations. She has been involved in
numerous soil and groundwater investigative and remedial activities due to the release of petroleum
substances from underground storage tanks. She has also supervised the removal of various USTs and
collected soil and groundwater closure samples at various sites. Her UST project experience
includes: i
^WASATCH
^WASATCH Environmentai Assessment Services
• Bay Petroleum Company, Lansing, Michigan: Various soil and groundwater investigative
activities to determine contaminant impact at the site. Supervision of Oxygen Release
Compound (ORC) to remediate impacted groundwater at the site.
• MPC, Inc. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Supervision of tank removal activities. Collection of soil
samples for UST closure.
• Amoco Oil Company, Detroit, Michigan: Various soil and groundwater investigative activities
to determine contaminant impact at the site.
• Browning Market, Browning, Michigan: Supervision of tank removal activities at the site.
Collection of soil samples. Further soil investigative activities to determine contaminant
impact at the site. Supervision of soil removal activities and collection of soil verification
samples. Closure of the site.
• Ruth Farm Elevator, Ruth, Michigan: Various soil and groundwater investigative activities,
including pumping tests, to determine contaminant impact, as well as, hydrogeological
conditions at the site. Closure of the site.
Other Projects Include:
• FDA Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois: Investigation, sampling and final decommissioning of a
federal drug laboratory.
• BASF, Detroit, Michigan: Soil and groundwater investigative activities to determine impact
of various contaminants at the site.
• Walden Woods, Highland, Michigan: Performed various pumping tests, slug tests and
collected soil samples for geotechnical analysis to determine hydrogeolgical conditions at
the site.
• Mason, Michigan: Performed a pumping test to determine hydrogeological conditions at a
site for the possible location of a city municipal water well.
TF GW-7
TFGW-2g| ^
TF GW-8 <£ TF GW-3
TF MW-S <t
TF GW-6 *
«TF GW-5
B-4
B-14
w^B-14A
° O
°°\
Empty AV
Fuel Tank Farm
Former
Oil Pit
Former
B-5
Office
Building
B-3
B-2
OOOO ASTs for Dispenser Island
Dispenser
Islands
^ Truck Scale
B-1
o
c a.
CD
"0
-6'
CD
5"
CD
Legend
TF=Thermo Fluids 1998 Investigation
N
S
Approximate Scale (ft)
40 80 100
WASATCH
ENVIRONMENTAL
2410 West California Avenue
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
801-972-8400
www.wosatch-environmental.com
Sample Location Map
Cowboy Oil
Woods Cross, UT
PROJECT NO.
1081-02A
DATE
July 30,2004
FIGURE 2A