DSHW-2014-011969 - 0901a0688048ebb9

ATK
www.atk.com
Launch Systems Group
P.O. Box 707
Brigham City, UT 84302 HAND DELIVERED
SEP 1 o 2014
September 10, 2014
8200-FY15-035
Mr. Scott T. Anderson, Director
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste
195 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Re: ATK Launch Systems Inc., EPA ID #UTD009081357; Semi-Annual RFI Progress Report for
March 2014 to September 2014.
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Attached is the ATK Launch Systems Inc. Promontory Facility Semi-Annual RFI Progress Report
for March 2014 to September 2014.
If you have questions regarding this report, please contact Paul Hancock at [phone]
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Sincerely,
Manager, Environmental Services
ATK Launch Systems
cc: Walter L. Baker, Division Director, Utah Division of Water Quality
SEMI-ANNUAL RFI PROGRESS REPORT
March 1, 2014 - September 1, 2014
ATK Launch Systems Promontory Facility
1. Description Of Work Completed
SWMU Assessment Report Schedule
As required by the Promontory Post-Closure Permit, ATK Launch Systems (ATK) provided
a schedule for submitting SWMU assessment reports or RFI work plans for the SWMUs
listed in Attachment 6 of the permit in to the Division in November 2007. After the Utah
Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste (UDSHW) has approved the schedule, ATK will
proceed with the assessment of the remaining SWMUs.
UDSHW Evaluation of Three SWMU's for Potential Closure
The UDSHW is currently evaluating three SWMUs for potential closure from the
Promontory RCRA RFI report submitted in August 2000. These SWMUS are # 192 -
Hydraflouric Acid Treatment Unit at building M-227, #444 - Dry Well at building M-19A,
and #649 - Strand Burner Exhaust Discharge at building M-585. Based on a UDSHW
September 10, 2013 site visit and a October 1, 2013 letter, it was determined that #444 could
be closed, but additional information on #649 and #192 was warranted in order to establish
the valence state of chromium from the total chromium analysis of the soil. Soil samples
were collected from these two locations and analyzed for Chromium (VI). The results for
#192 reported a non - detect for chromium (VI). The results for #649 reported a value of 0.4
ppm for chromium (VI) which is slightly above the EPA Regional Screening Level of 0.29
ppm. These results were provided to the UDSHW in the March 2014 RFI report. The
#649 SWMU is a very small site, consisting of a soil filled pipe, approximately 8 inches in
diameter and approximately 2 feet deep. Therefore, it will be a small excavation to remove
the contamination contained within the pipe. Testing of soil in the excavation for chromium
(VI) will be conducted to verify contamination removal. With the approval of the Division,
this removal will take place during the next semi-annual reporting period.
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP) Report
The United States Air Force submitted an IRP report to the UDSHW in 1992 describing the
results of their investigation of the SWMUs at the old Air Force Plant 78 facility. ATK
purchased this facility in 1995. In a December 18,2012 letter, the UDSHW recommended
additional characterization of three sites. These included Blue Creek, the North Drainage
Ditch (NDD) and the M-585 dry well. ATK has been reviewing these sites and the
associated old risk assessment and discussed these with DSHW. Based on this review the
risks associated with Blue Creek and the NDD do not appear to be valid. A copy of this
review was submitted to the DSHW in the March 2014 RFI progress report. Additionally,
ATK has also investigated the NDD and submitted the results to UDSHW as SWMU #230,
and #282 in the October 2000 RFI report with a recommendation of no further action. There
are a total of 10 ATK SWMUs associated with the NDD. A visit was made by Jeff Vandel
and Helge Gabert on March 25,2014 to look at the IRP related SWMUs. Two SWMU sites
#280, and #417, former surface water discharge locations at building E-512, were identified
as needing additional sampling based on staining seen on the soil surface. Samples were
collected and the analytical data sheet is included in Attachment 1. This data shows there are
no hazardous constituents of concern. There are additional IRP sites associated with SWMUs
on the Promontory North Plant that ATK has been discussing with the DSHW for possible
closure. A figure showing the samples collected in at the IRP locations and the associated
SWMUs is found in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The old M-585 dry well site investigation is
discussed in the following paragraph on the P Well investigation.
North Plant P Wells Investigation
As part of the corrective action for SWMUs at the North Plant, the UDSHW submitted a
letter on February 3,2012 requesting that an additional well be installed in the same area as
wells P-2, P-6, and P-7. The intent of the new well, P-10, is to more accurately determine
flow direction in the uppermost perched aquifer. ATK submitted a well completion report to
the UDSHW in May 2012.
As discussed in the completion report, during the well development process, the water level
dropped to only 0.5 ft of water remaining in the well. Approximately five days later, the
water level had not changed. There was sufficient water to collect a grab sample on March
27,2012 using a disposable bailer. Results of the sample are contained in the completion
report and included a 1,1- DCE concentration at 6.8 ppb and a TCE concentration at 9.5 ppb.
No perchlorate was detected.
As of June 2014, the water level continues to remain at approximately three inches. It is
believed that due to the tight formation, water does not recharge quickly or because it was
completed in a perched aquifer, the producing zone may be limited. Well P-10 indicates that
the perched zones have a limited northern extent. These are perched aquifers that appear to
be separate, isolated, and laterally discontinuous.
In discussions with Helge Gabert and Jeff Vandel, the decision was made that during the
semi-annual spring 2014 groundwater sampling event to place a passive diffusion bag (PDB)
into the 3 inches of water to see if a useful sample could be collected in this way. The results
of the diffusion bag sample indicated much higher VOC levels than originally seen. These
sample results are found in Attachment 2. As a result, there is uncertainty whether this
sampling method can obtain accurate results when the bag is only partially submerged. In
talking with a supplier of PDBs, they confirmed that one would absolutely expect to see
higher VOC values when it is only partially submerged. A peristaltic pump or another
sampling method, with DSHW concurrence, will be used to attempt to obtain another sample
during the fall 2014 sampling event. Based on that result, it will be determined if additional
investigation will be required at the site.
Plant 3 Well 3A Treatment Summary Reports
The treatment system at the Promontory Plant 3 well 3 A has been monitored quarterly
according to the Division approved plan. The plan includes a request that a summary of the
previous year to date monitoring data be included in the September Semi-Annual report.
This summary is found in Table 1. The treatment system continues to remove TCE to below
the 5u/L health based limit with a carbon replacement interval of every 6 + months. Water
usage at Plant 3 has diminished with lower production. Therefore, ATK is finding that TCE
removal extends significantly beyond the standard 6 month carbon replacement interval. In
addition, perchlorate removal in the two septic tanks, M-201 and M-205, continues to be
effective with the all samples reported at non-detect.
Table 1
Plant 3 Well 3A Quarterly Treatment Summary Sept 2013 - June 2014
For Perchlorate (C104.) and Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Well 3A Carbon and Septic Tank Treatment Sampling Data (ug/L)
Date Influent Carbon Effluent Septic Tanks Effluent
(M-201 and
M-205)
Flow (gal)
Totalizer reading
9/30/13 33.4 TCE
88. C104.
U TCE
83 CIO4-
U CIO4. 10496
12/16/13 NS 2.8 TCE
79 CIO4.
U CIO4. 13101
3/27/14 24.2 TCE
II8CIO4-
2.1 TCE
82 CIO4-
U CIO4. 22362
6/30/14 NS 2.8 TCE
84 CIO4-
U CIO4. 37981
U = not detected
NS= Not Sampled
2. Summaries of All Findings
The summaries of the corrective action work on conducted on SWMUs during this reporting
period are found in section 1 above.
3. Summaries of All Problems or Potential Problems Encountered During the Reporting
Period
There were no significant problems encountered during the reporting period.
4. Actions Taken to Rectify Problems
No problems were identified.
5. Projected Work for the Next Reporting Period
Monitoring the P wells and the Plant 3 Well 3 A treatment system will be ongoing through the
next reporting period. With the DSHW approval, ATK will remove M-585 dry well soils
with the Cr (VI) concentrations over the current PRG values. ATK will work with UDSHW
in investigating and closing the SWMUs currently under review associated with the IRP
related SWMUs and the other SWMUs currently under evaluation.
Attachment 1
Analytical Results for
Soils at Building E-512
SWMUs #280 and #417
988P LS336
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Listing of Sample Information and Testing Requested
Tuesday, June 03, 2014
TESTED FOR: ATK: DLV
Environmental Monitoring
Thiokol Corp, UT 84322
ANALYZED BY: ATK Launch Systems
Analytical Chemistry Laboratory
P.O. Box 707, M/S 245
Brigham City, UT 84302-0707
435-863-3732
435-863-8080
Contact Name: Paul Hancock
Project: Ground Water Testing - DLV
Sample Delivery Group: 1404014
Printed:
Page 1 of 4
06/03/14 10:34
Sample Delivery Group: 1404014
Sample No. Client No.
Test Requested Sample Description
Received Collect Date/Time
Matrix
1404014-01 E512#1 04/21/14 4/21/2014 10:45:00
3510 (Water), 3550 (Soil)
8015/8021B (Mod)/Diesel
SW-846, 3050B
SW-846, 6010B (Solids)
SW-846, 7471A
Diesel Extraction
Diesel TPH in Soil
ICP/GFAA Metals Digestion
Metals Analysis by ICP - 6010B
Mercury Analysis
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
1404014-02 E512#2 04/21/14 4/21/2014 10:50:00
3510 (Water), 3550 (Soil)
8015/8021B (Mod)/Diesel
SW-846, 3050B
SW-846, 6010B (Solids)
SW-846, 7471A
Diesel Extraction
Diesel TPH in Soil
ICP/GFAA Metals Digestion
Metals Analysis by ICP - 6010B
Mercury Analysis
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Certified By:
W. Scott Fraser, Quality Assurance Officer
06/03/2014
Date
This certifies that the following data meets the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP) unless otherwise annotated:
Comments:
The TPH analysis showed that the hydrocarbons present were most like motor oil and did not resemble gasoline or diesel as show in the
attached chromatogram.
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 06/03/1410:34
Listing of Results by Sample
Sample Delivery Group: 1404014
Client Sample ID: E512#1
Sample Description: ATK-DL V - Soil Sam pies from E512
Laboratory Sample ID: 1404014-01
Date Sampled: 04/21/14 10:45
CAS Number Test Parameter Result Units
Dilution
MDL EQL Factor Analyst Test Date
Test Method: 3510 (Water), 3550 (Soil) Diesel Extraction
DIESEL EXTRACTION 04/29/2014 PCI 04/29/14
Test Method: 8015/8021B (Mod)/Diesel Diesel TPH in Soil
630-02-4
DIESEL TPH
OCTACOSANE
U mg/kg
%
2.7 8.5 PCI
PCI
Test Method: SW-846,3050B ICP/GFAA Metals Digestion
3050B ACID DIGESTION DATE 05/05/2014 MTB 05/05/14
Test Method: SW-846,6010B (Solids) Metals Analysis by ICP - 6010B
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
7439-89-6
7439- 92-1
7782-49-2
7440- 22-4
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
IRON
LEAD
SELENIUM
SILVER
60.
0.5 J
18.8
11900.
21.9
U
u
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
0.2
0.1
1
2
2
3
0.1
1
0.5
5
10
10
15
0.5
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
Test Method: SW-846, 7471A Mercury Analysis
7439-97-6 MERCURY U mg/kg 0.03 0.09 MDP 05/05/14
Client Sample ID: E512#2
Sample Description: ATK-DLV - Soil Samples from E512
Laboratory Sample ID: 1404014-02
Date Sampled: 04/21/14 10:50
CAS Number Test Parameter Result Units
Dilution
MDL EQL Factor Analyst Test Date
Test Method: 3510 (Water), 3550 (Soil) Diesel Extraction
DIESEL EXTRACTION 04/29/2014 PCI 04/29/14
Test Method: 801S/8021B (Mod)/Diesel Diesel TPH in Soil
630-02-4
DIESEL TPH
OCTACOSANE
U mg/kg
%
2.7 8.5 PCI
PCI
Test Method: SW-846,3050B ICP/GFAA Metals Digestion
3050B ACID DIGESTION DATE 05/05/2014 MTB 05/05/14
Test Method: SW-846,6010B (Solids) Metals Analysis by ICP-6010B
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
7439-89-6
7439- 92-1
7782-49-2
7440- 22-4
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
IRON
LEAD
SELENIUM
SILVER
63.4
0.7
19.8
8880.
13.7
U
U
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
0.2
0.1
1
2
2
3
0.1
1
0.5
5
10
10
15
0.5
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
MTB
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
05/07/14
TestMethod: SW-846.7471A Mercury Analysis
7439-97-6 MERCURY U mg/kg 0.03 0.09 MDP 05/05/14
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 06/03/14 10:34
Data Reporting Qualifiers
Indicates that the analyte concentration is less than the MDL.
This flag is used when an analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample.
Indicates an extimated value. This flag is used either when estimating a concentration
for tentatively identified compounds or when the data indicated the presence of a
compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the
EQL (e.g. 3 J with an EQL of 10).
Method Detection Limit: The minimum concentration of a substance that can be
confidently measured and reported. The laboratory has demonstrated that the
MDL can be achieved in a laboratory reagent blank, but does not guarantee it
can be achieved in all sample matrices.
Estimated Quantitation Limit: The EQL generally is 5 to 10 times the MDL. For
many analytes the EQL is selected as the value of the lowest standard in the
calibration curve.
Dilution Factor: The prepared sample was diluted by this factor because the
sample was too concentrated or due to other interferences in the sample matrix.
Any dilution factor causes a corresponding increase in the MDL and EQL.
Page 4 of 4
Prinled: 06/03/1410:34
ATK Space Systems Group
Environmental Laboratory
,Q Wrotfxl1* Sample Receipt Checklist «
CWNm..jElW^ S0GN0 l^MolAr n.,
Carrier PftvX Ufi^CuC*-; Carrier Number:
Hand delivered, no cooler *«Hand delivered, sample(s) taken out at receiving counter Initials.
Cooler Information
Cooler Number/ID:
Condition of Shipping Container: iGood Fair :Not Applicable Damaged (explain)
Cooler Sealed (taped): :Yei No • ;Not Applicable
Custody Seals Present' :Yes No • iNot Applicable
Intact iBroken Seal Number:
Coolant: ilea tjalue'lce ' 'None Other. Ipjuaric
State of Coolant: _ :Frozen u^Partially Frozen Melted
Thermometer ID:Slffi}fry(/ Reading: JU °C CF: Connected Temp:
Packing Description:
Temp Blank Included: ' iYes I :No
pttvty^ btrffttj /h caoUs vrfu (>U*JL. foe, pedes „ SwyltS <jhk**-
Chaln-Of-Cu*tody Information:
COC Present: f-.
COC Numbertil: l> I? ?Sv y
COC signed (relinquished and received): tVfW UNo I INot Applicable
COC or LW) agree* with sample labels'. nNo ' INot Applicable
Notes:
Sample Information:
Samples Included In cooler.
Custody Seals Present:
Sample containers intact:
Sample* in proper containen:
Sufficient sample volume:
All samples received In hold tlma:
I IYes
liintact
IKTrtS
We*
HNO Other.
i: l/TVes
11 Broken Seal Numb*r(a) _
riNo Note*:
UNo
UNo
IINO
Water - VOA's have zero headspace:
I IPre-preserved with HCl:
Notes:
LlYas UNo tINot Applicable
I IPre-preserved with NaiSjCV 1Z A LlNon-Preserved:
VrflflclAp Water - pH acceptable upon receipt: I IYes
HNO,» H,SO« =
l lAdjusted (see comment* below) VrlNot Applicable
NaOH = ZnAC/NaOH = HCL •
Water - pH adjusted: (mfg. & Lot No.)
HNO, HjSOv
NaiSOiOj Other.
NaOH. ZnAC _HCI_
Notes:
SOP-102 Form A
ENVIRONMENTAL LAB WORK REQUEST
1404014
it>: ATK LAUNCH SYSTEMS INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY LWRNo. E13528
Login No.
FROM. EXTENSION: COST CENTER:
8200
WORKORDER:
988P/LS333
ORGANIZATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MAIL STOP:
301
REPORT RESULTS TO:
SAMPLE DATE
SAMPLE INFORJIATION
TYPE LOCATION TIME TEST REMARKS
5e, ta.
7£i Ft-, C»-, C<^^,$e, fefl
n.
12.
13.
RELINQUISHED BY
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
RECEIVED BY DATE TIME
DATE COMPLETED
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY
DATE REPORTED SIGNATURE
rei •t'(C-e>«M>'»»Ti(i«>ssxA'.«>attt -
Diesel Standard
Sample
Motor Oil Reference
Sample
Attachment 2
Analytical Results for Passive Diffusion Bag
Sampling at Well P-10
988P LS336 GW
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Listing of Sample Information and Testing Requested
Thursday, July 17, 2014
TESTED FOR: ATK: DLV
Environmental Monitoring
Thiokol Corp, UT 84322
ANALYZED BY: ATK Launch Systems
Analytical Chemistry Laboratory
P.O. Box 707, M/S 245
Brigham City, UT 84302-0707
435-863-3732
435-863-8080
Contact Name: Al Lee
Project:
Sample Delivery Group:
Ground Water Testing - DLV
1407007
Page 1 of 7
Printed: 07/17/14 14:54
Sample Delivery Group: 1407007
Sample No. Client No.
Test Requested Sample Description
Received Collect Date/Time
Matrix
1407007-01 P-10 06/27/13 06/27/2014 10:30:0
SW-846, 8260B (Water) Volatile Organics Appendix 9 Water
1407007-02 H-10 06/27/13 06/27/2014 11:15:0i
EPA 314.0
SW-846 9050A
SW-846, 8260B (Water)
Perchlorate - Ion Chromatography
Conductivity
Volatile Organics Appendix 9
Water
Water
Water
Certified By: 07/17/2014
W. Scott Fraser, Quality Assurance Officer Date
This certifies that the following data meets the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP) unless otherwise annotated:
Printed:
Page 2 of 7
07/17/14 14:54
Listing of Results by Sample
Sample Delivery Group: 1407007
Client Sample ID: P-10
Sample Description: ATK-DLV - Groundwater 1st Semiannual Sampling 2014
Laboratory Sample ID: 1407007-01
Date Sampled: 06/27/14 10:30
CAS Number Test Parameter Result Units MDL
Dilution
Factor Analyst Test Date
TestMethod: SW-846, 8260B (Water) Volatile Organics Appendix 9
67-64-1 ACETONE
107-02-8 ACROLEIN
107-13-1 ACRYLONITRILE
107- 05-1 ALLYL CHLORIDE
71-43-2 BENZENE
108- 86-1 BROMOBENZENE
74- 97-5 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
75- 27-4 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
75-25-2 BROMOFORM
74- 83-9 BROMOMETHANE
71-36-3 1-BUTANOL
78-93-3 2-BUTANONE
135-98-8 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE
98-06-6 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
75- 15-0 CARBON DISULFIDE
56-23-5 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
108-90-7 CHLOROBENZENE
75-00-3 CHLOROETHANE
110-75-8 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER
67-66-3 CHLOROFORM
74-87-3 CHLOROMETHANE
126-99-8 CHLOROPRENE
(2-CHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE)
95- 49-8 2-CHLOROTOLUENE
106-43-4 4-CHLOROTOLUENE
108-94-1 CYCLOHEXANONE
96- 12-8 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE
124-48-1 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
106-93-4 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
74- 95-3 DIBROMOMETHANE
95-50-1 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
541-73-1 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
106- 46-7 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
75- 34-3 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
107- 06-2 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
75-35-* 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
156-59-4 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
75-71-8 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
78-87-5 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
142-28-9 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
590-20-7 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
563-58-6 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
10061-01-5 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10061-02-6 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
141-78-6 ETHYL ACETATE
10W1-4 ETHYLBENZENE
60-29-7 ETHYL ETHER
97- 63-2 ETHYL METHACRYLATE
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
6.2 J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
31.1
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
5
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
15
2
0.4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.9
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
5.9
5.6
5.9
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.4
2
2
2
0.2
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
Page 3 of 7
Printed: 07/17/1414:54
Listing of Results by Sample
Sample Delivery Group: 1407007
Client Sample ID: P-10
Sample Description: ATK-DLV - Groundwater 1st Semiannual Sampling 2014
Laboratory Sample ID: 1407007-01
Date Sampled: 06/27/14 10:30
CAS Number Test Parameter Result Units MDL EQL
Dilution
Factor Analyst Test Date
Test Method: SW-846, 8260B (Water) Volatile Organics Appendix 9
76-13-1 FREON 113
87-68-3 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
591-78-6 2-HEXANONE
67-63-0 ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
98- 82-8 ISOPROPYLBENZENE
108-10-1 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
78- 83-1 2-METHYL-1-PROPANOL (ISOBUTYL
ALCOHOL)
79- 46-9 2-NITROPROPANE
99- 87-6 4-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE
126- 98-7 METHACRYLONITRILE
74- 88-4 METHYL IODIDE
80- 62-6 METHYL METHACRYLATE
75- 09-2 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
104-51-8 N-BUTYLBENZENE
103-65-1 N-PROPYLBENZENE
91-20-3 NAPHTHALENE
107- 12-0 PROPIONITRILE
100-42-5 STYRENE
156-60-5 TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
110-S7-6 TRANS-1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
108- 88-3 TOLUENE
630-20-6 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
79-34-5 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
127- 18-4 TETRACHLOROETHENE
87-61-6 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
120-82-1 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
79-00-5 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
79-01-* TRICHLOROETHENE
71-55-6 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
75-69-4 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
96-18-4 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
95-63-6 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
108-67-8 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
108-05-4 VINYL ACETATE
75-01-4 VINYL CHLORIDE
1330-20-7 m,p-XYLENE
95-47-6 O-XYLENE
460-00-4 BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
1868-53-7 DIBROMOFLUOROMETHANE
17060-07-0 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE-D4
2037-26-5 TOLUENE-D8
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
185
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
108
112
109
92.2
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
%
1
2
2
10
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
4.4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
20
2
2
2
10
10
10
50
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
PCI
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
07/02/14
Page 4 of 7
Printed: 07/17/1414:54
Data Reporting Qualifiers
u
B
J
MDL
EQL
Dilution
Factor
Indicates that the analyte concentration is less than the MDL.
This flag is used when an analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample.
Indicates an extimated value. This flag is used either when estimating a concentration
for tentatively identified compounds or when the data indicated the presence of a
compound that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the
EQL (e.g. 3 J with an EQL of 10).
Method Detection Limit: The minimum concentration of a substance that can be
confidently measured and reported. The laboratory has demonstrated that the
MDL can be achieved in a laboratory reagent blank, but does not guarantee it
can be achieved in all sample matrices.
Estimated Quantitation Limit: The EQL generally is 5 to 10 times the MDL. For
many analytes the EQL is selected as the value of the lowest standard in the
calibration curve.
Dilution Factor: The prepared sample was diluted by this factor because the
sample was too concentrated or due to other interferences in the sample matrix.
Any dilution factor causes a corresponding increase in the MDL and EQL.
Page 7 of 7
Printed: 07/17/1414:54
ATK Space Systems Group
Environmental Laboratory
klk-.wJ Client Name-
Carrier
Hand delivered, no cooler I, no cooler , Uland
Sample Receipt Checklist
SDG No. Date ~ZS? T<S"
Carrier Number.
land delivered, samplers) taken out at receiving counter
Initials-
Cooler Information:
Cooler Number/ID:
Condition of Shipping Container:
Cooler Sealed (taped):
Custody Seals Present-
Coolant
State ol Coolant:
Thermometer ID:
Packing Description:
>«8od
IYes
•• iYes
; Intact
>^Ke'
J I Fair
UNO-
I iBroken
i I8lue Ice
iNot Applicable
I INot Applicable
II Not Applicable
iDamaged (explain).
1 iNone
Seal Number. _
Other.
4>
iFrozen rrfartlally Frozen
Reading:. CF:
! Melted
Corrected Temp:_ Temp Blank Included: i iYes 11N0
Chain-Of-Custody Information:
COC Present:
COC Numberfs):
COC signed (relinquished and received):
COC or LWI agrees with sample labels:
Notes:
onnanon. . —
r; *^°* llNo Other C l^fl-J
UNo
MNo
11 Not Applicable
I INot Applicable
Sample Information:
Samples Inducted in cooler
Custody Seals Present
Sample containers intact
Samples in proper containers:
Sufficient sample volume:
All samples received In hold time:
l IYes
nlntact
>rYes
Jftes
jj*eT
-rrfio
I IBroken
DNo
riNo
UNo
riNo.
Other
Seal Numbers).
Notes:
Water - VOAVfiave zero headspace:
(^Pre-preserved with HCl:
Notes:
UNO
[ IPre-preserved with Na,SiO>
riNot Applicable
UNon-Preserved:
vfWot/ Water - pH acceptable upon receipt: i IYes
HNO,» HjS04-
11 Adjusted (see comments below) vflNot Applicable
NaOH = ZnAC/N»OH> HCL = .
Water - pH adjusted: (mtg. & Lot No.)
HNO, H£04.
Na,SO,0, Other.
_NaOH ZnAC HCl
Notes:
SOP-102 Form A
ENVIRONMENTAL LAB WORK REQUEST
1407007
TO ATK LAUNCH SYSTEMS INC. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY LWRNo. E13545
Login No.
EXTENSION: COST CENTER:
8200
WORK ORDER:
988P/LS333
>ATE:
ORGANIZATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MAIL STOP: REPORT RESULTS TO'
SAMPLE INFORMATION
SAMPLE DATE TYPE
rn x
LOCATION TIME TEST REMARKS
rr rLi W
\tec-62&0, cloH,3W.O
10.
II.
12.
13.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
RELINQUISHED BY
a
RECEIVED BY DATE TIME
tew
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY
DATE COMPLETED DATE REPORTED SIGNATURE
Figure 1 and 2
IRP Sample Locations, and Associated ATK SWMUs
and RFI Sample Sites
Figure 1 IRP Locations North Drainage Ditch Area Sampling and SWMUs
Air Force IRP
Samples
ATK RFI Samples
SB-A
i 1SW
1SS 3 SW, 2 SS,
2 SB, 1 DB
(P-4abd.)
2 SB 1SW, 1SW 1 DB
(P-3)
SS 1SS 1SS, .. . ..Mi* 1SB 1SB SW 1SB 1SB
SB
*
0!d
Sewer
Plant
E-541
Sewer 1SS
Sewage
Evap.
pond
ft \-T-
*4~ ,j 9 1 DB
(P-5) 1SW,
1SS
SB
* ft
i- ,
•
Key:
SS=Soil Sample or Sediment
SW=Surface Water
SB=Shallow Boring (to 25 ft)
DB= Deep Boring (made into GW well)
Pipe =
Ditch =
Figure 2 IRP Location and Associated SWMUs
P5 ,. v. i
Faust Valley Drainage IRP and RFI Sampling
And Blue Creek Related SWMUS
l 4 Blue Creek
SWMU 661
i .r ,:£ - T i . 6 IHr ' E-541
sewer
Plant
a.
Km
E-541 sewer
discharge to
Blue Creek
SWMU 498 1 • ml'
SWMU 660 (RFI)
4-10 ft borings
IRP Faust Valley
Drainage Course sampling
- Surface
- Shallow / Deep borings
cr 1
WfmWj IS
ft
01