Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSHW-2013-001303 - 0901a0688033e0adJanuary 15, 2013 Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste Mr. Scott T. Anderson, Director m 1S 20Q Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste 195 North 1950 West P.O. Box 144880 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880 Re: ATK Launch Systems-Promontory EPA ID number UTD009081357 Compliance Evaluation Inspection Dear Mr. Anderson: ATK Launch Systems Inc. (ATK) is responding to the Utah Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste letter dated December 11, 2012 regarding the compliance evaluation inspection conducted on September 25 and 26, 2012 at ATK's Promontory facility. The Division has expressed concern about the ash disposal practice involving the M-136 landfill. The Division has requested that ATK dispose of the burn ash/residue off-site. This request was based on low concentrations of perchlorate in two samples (Lab Samples ID 1203017-01 and 1203017-02) of material that had been shipped off-site to a Subtitle C landfill for disposal. Lab Sample ID 1203017-01 was from burn ash from laboratory material and is not representative of normal burn ash/residue; this material was in fact identified for off-site disposal based on process knowledge that the material might contain listed waste solvents. This was likely a small laboratory sample which would not have contained enough reactive material to burn hot enough for complete perchlorate oxidation. Lab Sample ID 1203017-02 was from filter cake residue from the M-705 wastewater treatment plant; this material was also identified for off-site disposal based on process knowledge that the material might contain listed wastes. The filter cake residue from the wastewater treatment plant is always shipped off-site for disposal. The normal burn ash/residue is placed in the M-136 landfill. ATK has a data set (shown in Table 1) which indicates that the normal burn ash/residue has no residual perchlorate after burning. This lack of perchlorate would be expected given the high temperature burning. 1 Table 1: ATK Promontory Burn Ash/Residue Perchlorate Results Sample Date Sample Description Perchlorate (mg/kg) MDL EQL 5/7/2003 M-136 Washout Ash U 0,1 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 5/7/2003 M-136 Washout Ash U 0.1 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 7/9/2003 M-136 Promontory General Burn Ash U 0.1 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 7/9/2003 M-136 Promontory General Burn Ash U 0.1 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 5/26/2010 M-136 Washout Ash :EQL 2.0 mg/kg 8.0 mg/kg 7/28/2011 M-136 Promontory General Bum Ash <EQL 1.0 mg/kg 4.0 mg/kg 9/2/2011 M-136 Bacchus Burn Ash U 0.1 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 9/7/2011 M-136 Flare Burn Ash U 0.1 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg 6/11/2012 M-225 Burn Ash U 0.1 mg/kg 0.4 mg/kg U Indicates that the analyte concentration is less than the MDL MDL Method Detection Limit EQL Estimated Quantitation Limit Based on the analytical results showing no residual perchlorate, ATK does not believe that off- site disposal ofthe normal non-hazardous burn ash/residue is warranted. Nonetheless, ATK is open to further discussion with Division staff on this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Blair Palmer at (435) 863-2430 or me at (801) 251- 4643. Sincerely, Robert Ingersoll Director Environmental Services ATK Launch Systems Inc. cc: Brad Maulding JeffVandel 2