DSHW-2009-023231 - 0901a06880162770

gjtj^
12 December 2010
8200-FYl 0-068
Mr. Dennis R. Downs, Executive Secretary HAND DELIVERED
State of Utah Department ofEnvironmental Quality 3ss'^s
Division of SoUd and Hazardous Waste JAN 1 3 2010
288N.1460W.
P.O. Box 144880 UTAH DIVISION OF
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880 ^^^^^^^/V)^^
Attention: Jeff Vandel
Re: ATK Launch Systems-Promontory EPA ID number UTD009081357
Waste Characterization and Air Dispersion Modeling Protocol for use in the
Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments
Dear Mr.Downs;
This letter accompanies draft copies of sections 3 and 4 ofthe protocol for use in the
Subpart X permitting ofthe open bimiing and open detonation operations at the ATK
Launch Systems Promontory Utah facility.
Contained within section 3 is Table 3-2, "Reactive Waste Group Profiles". ATK Launch
Systems Inc. (ATK) request that Table 3-2 be protected and maintained as "Proprietary
Information". Table 3-2 includes proprietary ingredients that are contained in many of
our propellants and explosives.
ATK also requests that the Division maintain Table 3-2 as "Export Controlled". Table 3-
2 contains technical data within the definition ofthe Intemational Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR), and is subject to the export control laws ofthe U.S. Govemment.
Transfer ofthis data by any means to a foreign person, whether in the U.S. or abroad,
without an export license or other approval from the U.S. Department of State is
prohibited." For further information about ITAR regulations see 22 C.F.R. Chapter I,
Subchapter M, Parts 120-130.
Please contact me if you have any questions conceming this report. My telephone
number is [phone] or you can contact Blair Palmer at [phone].
Sincerely
David P. Gosen, P.E., Director
Environmental Services
Rev. 1
3.0 WASTE CONSTITUENTS/EMISSIONS CHARACTERIZATION
In order to conduct a risk assesstnent of ATK treatment operations, it Is necessary to characterize the
waste constituents and emission products of the formulations that are treated via OB and OD at M-136
and M-225. The principal waste fomnulatlons treated at ATK Include 1.1 and 1.3 class waste propellant
materials and flare wastes. The waste constituents and emissions associated with these formulations
have been characterized based on the followmg Information:
ATK detailed descriptions of reactive waste categories and
Section 3.1
ODOBi emission test results for Class 1.3 propellan
Bang Box emission test results for Class 1.1 pro
ODOBi emission test results for military ordn
composition to flare wastes - see Section 3.2.3
Section 3.2.1
-See Section 3.2.2
cartridges,
The potential for air emissions associat
treatment, and post-treatment activities. Pre^
the volatilization of some DOO^tbiretA^aste mat
delivered to each treatmej^pfflt'ln^B^^r other
waste matenals remaiffiiPine bags or «fcr closed
waste materials prior fmbJal treatmtfi^^xQcess.
waste profiles - see
ave similar
can result from pretreatment,
are \ip^limlted and primarily related to
^bu>n pans. All waste materials are
^containers ^d are placed in the burn pans. The
tamers , which prevents the wind dispersal of solid
The potei^l^p^K^^^atmeWEgtaisslons are limlfSa to wind dispersal of burn pan ash. However, ATK
utilizes^^CTatlng pro^^bg th^^^^itly reduce or eliminate the potential for wind blown emission of
solidIfSQerials from the bur^&ns. FoBxample, the ash from treatment operations is collected following
a treatm^^^tyent as soon a^Wftnditions^are considered safe. The collected ash is either placed in a
covered druif^^&^ffsite dispo^aor placed in an onsite landfill In addition, burn pan covers are used
whenever conditlomDrevenbfllnout in a timely manner. In addition, the pans are covered after clean
out or turned upside"S^H^g^event precipitation from collecting in the pans.
As a result, fugitive emissions from pre-treatment and post-treatment operations are considered
insignificant and are not discussed in this protocol. The remainder of Section 3 pertains to the
characterization of emissions from ATK treatment events.
HAND DELIVERED
JAN 1 3 2010
UTAH DIVISION OF
SOLID & HAZARDOUS WASTE
090904/P 3-1
Rev. 1
3.1 WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
The reactive wastes open burned and open detonated at M-136 and M-225 are classified into company-
defmed reactive categories A through H, which are described In Table 3-1. In order to facilitate the safe
handling of these reactive wastes, ATK further characterizes these waste materials into waste profiles,
which are shown in Table 3-2. Table 3-2 identifies the profile reference number, generai description, and
summary of profile constituents associated with each reactivity group. T^jje 3-3 contains a separate
waste characterization for reactive category G, Profile Number PR$3i0nich contains reactive and
unstable laboratory waste chemicals. ATK has developed spec^gShouse handling and disposal
instructions for each waste profile in order to avoid potential acd^ps freMPlshandling of these highly
energetic materials. Table 3.4 presents the ATK profile refejA^ numbers aS^iated with Autoliv waste
materials within reactive category E.
M*136 Treatment Unit
As described in Section 2.3.1, the M-136 iBMtment unit is ctMlgisd of 14 burn stations that are located
in three general areas. Figure 2-3 show^^^Rbut of each treSient station. Based on the treatment
processes and relative location of the l^jprn^'SfifliBSfefi, the eimion sources for M-136 can be
represented by three separate treatment sourcCaor O^^iS^^Qurc^^r OD.
The table below idenj^^he M-i;
modeling analysis. Tmtable also idj
that are treated at each^^BASCe.
associatedjfli^SBstbte catf
amission lastrces that will be evaluated in the air dispersion
Fies the bufln^tonation stations and reactive waste categories
I36^fets 1.1 and 1.3 class wastes and flare wastes
^lag|rnls8lon SourcelUji^
Open CT^^ Source 1 H
open Burnj^tp^y
Open Burning Source 3
Open Detonation Source 1
^Surn/Detonation
^jpstations
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,
9, 10, 11, 12
13
14
13&14
Reactive Waste Categories Treated
A, B.C, D, E, F. G, H
(1.1 and 1.3 class wastes)
A, B,C, D, E, F.G, H
(1.1 and 1.3 class wastes)
A. B. C, D
(1.1 and 1.3 class wastes)
C, D, G, H
(1.1 and 1.3 class wastes)
090g04/P 3-2
Rev. 1
M-225 Treatment Unit
As described in Section 2.3.2, the M-225 treatment unit is composed of four OB stations and one OD
station. Figure 2-6 shows the layout and relative location of the burn trays and OD pit Based on the two
types of treatment processes, the emission sources for M-225 can be represented by two separate
treatmenl sources.
The table below identifies the M-225 emission sources that will be.
modeling analysis. The table also identifies the associated burn/d(
categories that are treated at each source. In summary, M-225 tn^L
wastes associated with reactive category E.
ated in the air dispersion
n stations and reactive waste
1.3 class wastes and flare
A review of ATK treaSwit operationaQr the anneQM^rlods 2006, 2007, and 2008 indicates that the
overwhelming majorit^^^H^ percenaHEjoastes tred^at ATK have been associated with reactive
category A, ^^^s pro^8|u|tonT)e iftSilg^m^^w summarizes the treatment quantities for all
reactive aJM^of^B^-yearnlgd. The 1.1 class propellants and Category E flare reactive groups
constUQBeTonly about tvnnd on^mc^nt, respectively, ofthe total wastes treated.
b ^
?Sppi$:lvlty Group
B& ^qF'
HP lass Waste
^mjA Jm 1.3
^^ j^^ ^-^
D~W
E
F
G
H
1.1,1.3
1.1
Flares
1.3
1.1,1.3
1.1,1.3
Total
Total Waste (Ibs.)
16791730
15953
242682
127530
207296
43043
6487
108
17434829
Percent of Total
Bumed
96.31%
0.09%
1.39%
0.73%
1.19%
0.25%
0.04%
<o.ai%
100.0%
The emission factors being proposed by ATK for the treatment of 1.1 and 1.3 class propellants and
category E flare are based on emissions testing of actual ATK waste materials. The emissions testing
090904/P 3-3
Rev. 1
was conducted at the Dugway Proving Ground (DPG), Open Detonation Open Bum Improved (ODOBi)
test chamber in Dugway, Utah. The emission factors being proposed for 1.3 and 1.1 class propellants
are discussed in Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2, respectively.
Emissions testing has not been conducted to characterize emissions associated with the treatment of
category E flare wastes, which include ATK flares and Autoliv reactive wastes. However, ATK is
proposing to use U.S. EPA, AP-42 (U.S.EPA, July 2009) ordnance specipAcnission factors to address
the impact from treatment of category E flares and Autoliv waste matoiUfe'The AP-42 emission factors
are based on open detonation emission testing of specific militagftttipce (illuminating cartridges),
which have ingredients similar to the wastes associated with ATl^^Segory^wes. The emission factors
being proposed for ATK category E flares and Autoliv wasteiHRliscussed in SliVfl^ 3.2.3.
3.2.1 Class 1.3 Waste Emission Factors
Although the waste materials treated at M-136 and
majority of wastes treated by ATK are 1 .^i^&jwastes. In 2(
DPG to obtained emission factors for ClBb^^^BBaterials.
determine emission factors for airborne cdi^ount
process waste (PV\/) mntrriilTiimiihr tests wefincon<
presented in the report
Propellant Matenals
Emissions were measure
consideredraH^BteEe of
1.1 and 1.3 class materials, the
TK conducted emissions testing at the
DOBi test chamber was used to
ree omint compositions of Class 1.3
e 7 to 15, 2006. Test results are
<isslon Characterization of Open Burning Waste
the following three waste scenarios that are
): 100% ammonioBftaerchlgM^APl propellant
PV^8?BL.85% AP propel^8S^+ 15% %sh
PW65-3SMfl^ AP propellaHg)- 35% trash
The first material fPV^M[{B|^s 100% Class 1.3 propellant. The other two test materials (PW85-15 and
PW65-15) consisted of Iffnixture of Class 1.3 propellant blended with different percentages of materials
such as cloth, paper, paper wipes, plastics, and cleaning items. The PV^85-15 trash sample was
determined by conducting a 2-week-long survey of the types and quantities of contaminated waste
coming from each live-area waste dock. The 15% trash ration was based on an analysis of daily
treatment data for the past 3 years. This sample is intended to be representative of most of the Class 1.3
contaminated waste streams treated at the ATK. The PW65-35 trash sample was determined In a similar
manner.
090904/P 3-4
Rev. 1
It is important to note that the 1.3 waste testing resulted in numerous analytical results being reported as
"non-detect" or 'below background". Based on a re-evaluation of key aspects of the test, including non-
detects, blank corrections and how background values were used, the UDSHW has determined that the
inherent uncertainty associated with the emissions test and calculation of 1.3 emission factors needs to
evaluated using two data sets that reflect the range of possible emissions based on the available data.
The first emission factor data set consists of a more "conservative" data set^iS the full method detection
limit (MDL) for non-detected compounds and background and blank vaMWTave not been subtracted out
from the test results. Table 3-5 shows the "conservative" emissioi^feSUdta set, which represents the
average emission factor for all three test scenarios (PW100, P\N&^5, ancn^^5-35).
The second set of emissions data represents a "correiap^^less conservative) sSBfiPOsed by ATK in
which all non-detects are replaced with % MDL (or«dHjL) and background/blank coS^ion has been
performed. Table 3-6 shows the "corrected" emissi^^tetor danSEl, which represent the average
emission factor for all three test scenarios (PWI 00, PW85-TTOMPW65-35).
Using the two sets of emissions data to as
of the uncertainties in the emissions da
conservative, or uncorrectefi^SSltoet will
analysis is required, inwiniiiii of'VR. emissi
unacceptable risk andn9'"con-ected"Ba set doe
using the less conservi^S^stimato^^BBifiBiQns is
of the potential impacts of some
that the risk results of the
sions are acceptable, no further
in the conservative data set produce an
, the risk results will be reviewed to determine if
d.
3.2.2
>rrecVSftemission factors presented in Tables 3-5 and 3-6, respectively, have
Sved by the UW|W forlSBbj the ATK evaluation of Class 1.3 materials.
sion Factors
In September o>^^7, san^^ representative of Class 1.1 explosive waste from the ATK Thiokol
Bacchus facility wer^H«fmd characterized at the Dugway Proving Grounds Bang Box chamber. Test
results are provided ^r the report titled Draft Sampling Results for Alliant "Slum" Emission
Charactenzatfon (Radian, 1998). These waste materials are considered representative ofthe 1.1 waste
materials treated at the M-136 and M-225 treatment units. Each test sample weighed about 3.8 pounds.
The materials tested included combinations of Class 1.1 propellants along with contaminated materials
such as cloth and paper wipes, plastics, and cleaning items as simulated in the 13 emission test
scenarios. The assumed combination of propellant and contaminated materials was 65 percent and 35
percent, respectively.
090904/P 3-5
Rev- 1
The 1.1 emission factors assigned half the detection level for alt nondetect results. A few semi-volatile
and dioxin/furan compounds were tentatively but not positively identified by mass spectroscopy. These
compounds were originally considered non-detects but were switched to full detects for conservatism.
The Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) for dioxins/furans are based on the World Health Organization
(WHO) recognized TEFs.
Table 3-7 shows the proposed emission factors for Class 1.1 material
assessment for the evaluation of Class 1.1 materials treated at the M-1
3.2.3 Category E Emission Factore
t will be used in the risk
M-225 treatment units.
As indicated above, ATK has not conducted i mi imijinnrij for specific typei^^Category E waste
materials, which include ATK flare-type wastes and^^nBnv wastes (reactive air bag^ste). The DEQ
has requested ATK to address the treatment of these n^^als in tljuMpRA. In the abseWl of test data,
ATK is proposing to use U.S. EPA, AP-42 (USEPA. 200^n^Hrspecific emission factors to account
for treatment of the specific Category E v^^^iaterials idemlBLabove. The emission factors selected
to represent treatment of these waste mat^KpBfabased on the^^^ation of specific military ordnance
Items, primarily illuminating cartridges, whicnBbve inPS^^ that^^i^ilar to the illuminants (flares)
associated with Category E (Si^MIe 3-1).
ATK has conducted
available AP^2 ordn^an. emissio
constituent data to consti
AP-42 SeaiiaiBMB»^JBB{|iarge
M816^,^pffm Infran
Cartrffl&was found to be
42 Secti99H5.3.22, which
Cartridge ernmbns.
isposition Action System (MIDAS) database and
included a comparison of ATK flare waste
AS database for the ordnance items found in
review, ATK has selected emission factors for the
i^n Cartridge. The constituent profile for the M816 Illumination
tive of the ATK flare wastes. Appendix A contains copy of AP-
ibes tlig characterization of M816, 61-mm Infrared (IR) Illumination
The characterization'^ft^Vemisslons is based on open detonation emissions testing conducted at the
Dugway Proving Groun^TUtah. Details regarding the testing are described in the final test report titled
Sampling Results for USAEC Phase IX Emission Characterization of Exploding Ordnance and
Smoke/Pyrotechnic (URS, 2008) and the document titled Detailed Test Plan for Phase IX Emission
Characterization of BurningSmoke/Pyrotechnics and Propellants (U.S. Army, 2006). The primary
emissions from the M816 81-mm IR Illumination Cartridge include carbon dioxide (C02) and particulate
matter. Criteria pollutants, hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), as defmed by the Clean Air Act (CAA), and
toxic chemicals are emitted at lower levels.
0d0904/P 3-6
Rev. 1
Table 3-8 presents emission factors tieing proposed to evaluate the treatment of Category E ATK flare-
type wastes and Autoliv wastes. The emission factors are in units of pounds of emissions lbs/lb of
material detonated. The emission factors in Table 3-8 were calculated from emission factors listed in AP-
42. Tables 15.3.22-1 and 15.3.22-2 and applying correction a correction factor of 0.108 (1/9.25) to
convert the emission factor units from lbs/item to lbs/lb. The weight of a single M816 81-mm IR
Illumination Cartridge is 9.25 Ibs.
0e0904/P 3-7
REFERENCES
Auer. 1978. "Correlation of Land Use and Cover with Meteorological Anomalies." Journal of Applied
Meteorcilogy, Volume 17, May 1978.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (AMS). 2002. 'A Climatelogical Study of Thermally
Driven Wind Systems of the U.S. Intermountain West". Jebb Q^Hwart, C. David Whiteman,
W. James Steenburgh, and Xindi Bian. Volume 83, Number 5, Pageyf||^08, May 2002.
DOE, 1984. The Toxicological Effects of Non-nuclear Po'lutarfR Section 17-T^^articulates, Department
of Energy Publication "Atmospheric Science and Pow^j^pKjction, Office of^ftotific and Technical
Information, United States Department of Energy.
Lakes Environmental, 2003a. "IRAP-h View Industrial
Lakes Environmental, Ontario, Canada.
Lakes Environmental, 2003b. "EcoRis]^^iew
Environmental, Ontario, Cana
ment Program for Human Health,
sessment Prcigram". Lakes
NASA, 1973. "NA^^S^FC Multil^v DlffusidHModels and Computer Program for Operational
Prediction of Toxic FiJSI&azards", Dy^pid, R.K., Bjcmind, J.R., H.E. Cramer Company for the National
Aeronautics and Space AQ^Iy^tj^g^^^^ngj^ce^ght Center, Alabama.
Kramei^lJIHFE., 1997.^^^1^^ BJn^^en Detonation Dispersion Model (OBODM) User's Guide', H. E.
Craif^Kpmpany, Sandy/^Kb 840ll^|411, and West Desert Test Center, U.S. Army Dugway Proving
Ground^Mway, Utah, DPG^fcument Iro. DPG-TR-96-008a, July 1997.
Radian InternatiMM-LC. ^^f Draft Sampling Results for Alliant "Slum" Emission Characterization,
Volumes 1, 2, and 3^|^^^Ror U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground Dugway, Utah, March 1998.
Stewart, J. Q., el al. "A Climatological Study of Thermally Driven Wind Systems of the United States
Intenmounlain West", Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Volume 83, Number 5, Page 669,
May 2002.
URS Corporation, 2005. "Human Health Risk Assessment In Support of Alliant Techsystems' Bacchus
Works, RCRA Subpart X Activities', Magna, Utah, Final Report, September 2005.
090904;P R-1
URS, 2008. Sampling Results for USAEC Phase IX Emission Characterization of Exploding Ordnance
and Smoke/Pyrotechnics, URS Group, Inc., Oak Ridge, Tennessee, June 2008.
U.S. Amiy. Munitions Items Disposition Action System (MIDAS) Database System, website,
https://midas.dac.army.mil/, U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center, McAlester, Oklahoma.
U.S. Army, January 1992. "Development of Methodology and TechnologyJ^dentlfying and Quantifying
Emission Products from Open Burning and Open Detonation ThermalAiKment Methods". U.S. Army
Armament Munitions and Chemicals Command, Rock Island, WTinoi
U.S. Army, 2006. Detailed Test Plan for Phase JjjRmission Chgl^terization of Burning
Smoke/Pyrotechnics and Propellants, West Desert TagKnter. U.S. Army Du5^LP'"oving Ground,
Utah, April 2006.
U.S. Army, 2009. Sampling Results for Emission Chara
Materials, Volume I - Summary Report, F«BMd.for ATK Lau
by U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground, U.
U.S. Army Defense AmmufljMM|teiPter (DA^^2(
(MIDAS) database; DAI^MIester,
of Open Burning Waste Propellant
ystems. Promontory, Utah, Prepared
Items Disposition Action System
USEPA, 1987. "AmbielliBonitorinQ^BffiaflBcefor PreoUion of Significant Deterioration (PSD), Office of
Air Quality PJaoglBg^nd S!ai|^g^eseai^^Mte^rk. N.C. EPA-450/4-87-007, May, 1987,
USES^S92. TechniclMAemoWbim: "Procedures for Substituting Values for Missing NWS
MetedfUtocal Data for U^QIbt RegOl^^ Air Quality Models". Office of Air Quality Planning, and
Standard^l^arch Triangletttk. North Carolina, July 7,1992.
USEPA, 1995a. "^j^ ^^i^P^'' ^^^ Industrial Source Complex Dispersion Models, Volumes I and M'.
Office of Air Quality ^^^K, and Standards. Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division, Research
Triangle Park, North Caronna. EPA-454/B-95-003a.
USEPA, 1995b. "PCRAMMET User's Guide." Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions,
Monitoring, and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. October 1995.
USEPA, 1997. "Procedures for Preparing Emission Factor Documents", Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. EPA-454/R-95-015, November 1997.
Og0904/P R-2
USEPA, 2000. "Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications". EPA-454/R-
99-005, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
USEPA, 2005. "Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities",
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA53D-D-98-001 A, September 2005.
USEPA, 2005. "Guideline on Air Quality Models", Titie 40, Codejf^^dera] Regulations Part 51,
Appendix W. November 2005.
USEPA, 2009. AP 42. Fifth Edition, Compilation of Air Pojl^ft Emission FaS®^olume 1: Stationary
Point and Area Sources, Volume I, Chapter 15: OrdnarjdJJKtonation. Section 15l!^^Pages 15.3-99 to
15.3-102.
090904/P R-3
LIST OF ACRONYMS
AFB
AMS
AMSL
AP
C
Cl
CO
CO2
COPC
DEM
DOE
DPG
HCL
HHRAP
HMX
ISCST3
MDI
MIDAS
NAAQS
NASA
NCDC
NEW
NOx
NWS
OB
OBODM
OD
OSHA
PM2.5
PMIO
PSD
PWI 00
PW85-15
PW65-35
QA/QC
Air Force Base
American Meteorological Society
above mean sea level
ammonium perchlorate
carbon
chlorine
carbon monoxide
cart>on dioxide
chemicals of potential concern
Digital Elevation Map
Department of Energy
Dugway Proving Grounds
hydrogen chloride
Human Health Risk As
cyclotetraethylenetetrani
Industrial^Sftuue Comple>
metho^^CRStftan it
is Items Dtmbsition
ll Ambien^^Ouality Star
Natidlw&erc
tional TISHEic Data Centef
ndt^^sive-^Uht
nitrogeMddes
National ^^Htother SeTVice
Open Burr
^pen Bti^Bben Detonation Dispersion Model
mation
OcdGP&tional Safety and Health Administration
Particulates less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter
Particulates less than 10 microns In aerodynamic diameter
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Process Waste 100% ammonium perchlorate
Process Waste 85% ammonium perchlorate + 15% contaminated trash
Process Waste 66% ammonium perchlorate + 35% contaminated trash
quality assurance/quality control
0g0904/P
Q-D
ODOBi
RDX
SCRAMS
SLAMS
SNL
SVOC
TB
TNT
TSL
TWA
UDEQ
UTAQ
UDSHW
USEPA
USGS
UTM
VOC
quantity-distance
Open Detonation Open Burn Improved
Cyclotrimethylene trinitramine
Support Center for Regulatory Air Models
State and Local Air Monitoring Stations
Sandia National Laboratory
semi-volatile organic compounds
triple base
trinitrotoluene
Toxic Screening Level
time-weighted average
Utah Department of EnvinDnmental
Utah Department of Air Quality
Utah Department of Environmenta
United States Environmental Protectio
United States Geolo^j^^^ce (USGS)
Universal Transverse
volatile organic compoun
f Solid and Hazaraous Waste
0g0904/P IV
TABLE 3-1
REACTIVE WASTE CATEGORIES
ATK PROiWIONTORY, UTAH
Category Description
B
Class 1.3 Composite Propellant Wittiout HMX. RDX, or CXM-3
These are the most common reactive wastes generated by ATK and are used In the
production of rocket motors. They meet, or are believed to meet the USDOT
characteristics of a class 1.3 explosive. They are a composite propellant and are
composed of one or more oxidizers, polymer binder and a fuel. The oxidizer is
predominantly ammonium perchlorate, but could also incli^dtootassium nitrate or
ammonium nitrate. The fuel used in this group is alumiQpKp^der-
Class 1.3 Composite Propellant With HMX, RDX,
This group is also a 1.3 or believed to be such, ar^
primary difference between A & B is that B contafe vanot
and RDX.
:M-3
iimilar to group A. The
'amines such as HMX
Class 1.1/1.3 Nitrate Ester Containing
This group is generally classed as a
the same ingredients as group B, I
nitrocellulose (NC) and a wider as
nitramines and NG & NC means a
oxidizer in these formulations. This propel
rocket motors.
High Explosive Material
This is the high explosive/K
are all classed as a 1.1. So
various forms of nitro benzen
and high percentages of nitra
used in warhfitd^nd other simi
1.1 propellant^bgntains many of
nitroglycerirr
A higher perclg^e of
luminum pow^ir and
to produce higher performance
y group. The
stituents
.sodiOmn|^nitrate,
esst_
uclion.^
and
n Is variable, but they
brmulations include
inum, teflon, nitroguanidine
CL-20. This material is
Class 1
This fl^p is typi
pycpnn^, ilium
primary^mzers i
nitrate an
isium,
jam IS
Oxid
This gro
ammonium
generated th
[evelopmen
is the d
tf^giexQ
sm
water
IMetal Powaere, or Autoliv ASP Products
3, but could also be a 1.1 or 1.4. It inciudes
ers, and Autoliv reactive air bag waste. The
lorate & nitrate, Strontium nitrate, sodium
mary metals include tin, indium, bismuth,
mum. In addition to air bag production, this
enerated from flare production and scraping of metal powder.
oes N^DClude High Explosives Such as HMX, RDX, or CXM-3
ountsnnKmall percentage of our total waste, and primarily includes
hlorat^Powder less than 15 microns. This waste is typically
h scraped production materials.
lie, llluminai
classed as a^
its, metals poil
ide potassium
^^^^ ate.
cesii^'"'""""
aterial - R&D Lab Use Oniy / indicate Suspected Category A-F
opmental materials group and is generated in the laboratories
entation, expired shelve life or from subscale production. It covers
les for a wide range of chemicals. These chemicals are explosives,
tive or are chemically unstable and unsafe to transport on a public road.
H Unique Waste - indicate Disposal Profile Number in Table 3-2
This is a category that composes a small quantity of unique wastes that do not fit into
any other profiles. The waste is generated from developmental work and subscale
production. Some of the predominant constituents include methanol and methylene
chloride used in poly oxetane production, and iron linoleate and other spontaneously
combustible materials.
"EXPORT CONTROLLED - The attached document (Table 3-2) contains technical
data vi^ithin the definition ofthe International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and is
subject to the export control laws of the U.S. Govemment. Transfer of this data by any
means to a foreign person, whether in the U.S. or abroad, without an export license or
other approval from the U.S. Department of State is prohibited."
V'"^:*.. '''<-^ %..f '-"m^
'J,
^A^.-^^S#:ferv,.^ ...^• ^tij^--"--^i:
• • y^ -••••.:.•. •-•!•,' ORIGINAL W/ATTACHMENTS
!:> . ' IN CONFIDENTIAL FILE
&
^^l.
>•
ATK PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
TABLE 3-3
REACTIVE GROUP G, PROFILE NUMBER PR53
REACTiVE & UNSTABLE LAB WASTE CHEMiCALS / BURNED LIST
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 2 OF 2
Acrylic Acrylate CAS # 3667-52-5
Ammonium Iodide CAS # 12027-06-4
Potassium Iodide CAS # 7681-11 -0
Potassium Tert-Butoxide CAS # 856-47-4
Ethyl Ether CAS # 60-29-70
Barium Azide CAS # 18810-58-7
Iminodiacetonitrile CAS # 628-87-5
Phosphours Trichloride CAS # 7719-12-2
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy) Hexane CAS #2618-77-
PSAN CAS # 33363-00-7 (Zinc Diammine Dinitrate) CA
Nickle (II) Perehlorate. Hexahydrate CAS # 13520-61-
2,2'-Azobis(2-methylpropionitrile), 98% CAS # 78-6.
Borane-tetra hydrof uran Complex CAS # 14044
Titanium (IV) Chloride. 99.9 % CAS # 7550^5?
Trigonox (Organic Peroxides / Alkyl Peroxides) CAS
VUL-CUP 40KE (Organic Peroxide) CAS # 25155-25-3
Hydrogen Peroxide 30% CAS # 772
Lupersol 231 (Organic Peroxide) CAS
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy) cyclohexane C^
Varox DBPH 50 CAS # 78-63-7 ( Peroxld
Tert-Butyl Perbenzoatea^614^5-9
Di-Cup 40KE CAS ^fatP?3Mfcfganic Peroxi
Varnox130XL
MEK Peroxld
Dibenzyl Peroxide C
TABLE 3-4
AUTOLIV WASTE PROPELLANT NAMES
AND ATK PROFILE NUMBERS
ATK PROMONTORY. UTAH
ATK
Profile
Number^
PR65
PR65
PR38
PR45
PR69
PR65
PR39
PR65
PR44
PR39
PR65
PR65 <i
PR6JK
P\U9^
Propellant Name
IgniterScrap Containing UIX 171, MIP1152,
and MIP 1191 jm
MIP-131 JK.
Reactivity
Group
^E
E
Hybrid Propellant RT-85-3 jf^ ^fc ^ A
NOF Hybrid Propellant j|||_^ «»^
TGS (MNP-352) uncoated & cog^JW] PIP-
1215 igniter ^^^
PIP 1215 Igniter Material^^^L^ V
FN-1089 Slurry in plastictubeHftapladB^KS
PIP-1215 Contaminated Wipes, pTHftKnd
LOVA Propellan^Hi^ ^^^
FN-1089 Booster SSPMbiny ^&P^
Spray-Coated lgnite%amilyjBn^^^ PIP-*-^
1272, PIP-1286, PIP-tt8^^piP-1^TO^
pfl^^Jgniters ^f ^
Tali Igni^^amily (Tali2ll^ali 22)
luting ft^TK (propelIant1|g|;^ no primers)
^"^L ^^a c /
E
D
C
E
E
E
C
Profile Numbers.
TABLE 3-5
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERiAL
'CONSERVATIVE" EMISSION FACTORS
ATK PROIMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 1 OF 6
Analytt
Particulatn
TSP
PM10
PM2.5
Metala
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Perchloratet
SVOCa
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorot)enzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dtchlorobenzene
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 -Chloronaphthalene
1-Naphthylamine
2,3,4,6-Telrach lorophenoi
2,4,5-Trichlorophenot
2,4.6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethvlphenoi
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoiuene
2,6-Dichlorophenoi
2,&-Dinitrotoluene
2-AcetylamJnofluorene
2-Chioronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-MethYlphenol
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
3,3'-DichlorobenzidJne
3,3'-Dimethvlbenzidine
3-Methylcholanthrene
Average Emission Factor (lb/lb)
g.8E-02
7.1 E-02
3.5E-02
2.7E.02
1.3E-05
2.3E-07
3.9E-06
9.8E-08
2.7E-07
1.1 E-05
2.9E-07
9.6E-06
1.6E-05
2.gE-^5
3.2E-05
3.3E-08
2.4E-05
7.5E-05
9.2E-07
6.3E-07
1.9E-06
1.2E-05
2.2E-07
2.5E-07
2.9E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
2.8E-07
2.6E-07
2.6E-07
2.5E-07
4.9E-06
3.2E-07
6.4E-07
5.8E-07
3.7E-07
3.1 E-06
1.1 E-05
2.7E-07
3.0E-07
3.1 E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
8.7E-07
1.4E-06
1.5E-06
4.9E-06
2.5E-07
2.6E-07
3.6E-06
2.5E-05
2.5E-07
TABLE 3-5
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
'CONSERVATIVE" EMISSION FACTORS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 2 OF 6
Analyte
3-Methylphenoi & 4-Methylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dlnitro-2-methylphenoi
4-Aminobiphenvl
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chioroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenoi
7,12-Dimethvlbenz(a)anthracene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(l()fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
bis(2-Chlorolsopropyl) ether
bis(2-ElhYlhexyl) phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Carbazole
Chrysene
CS
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyi phthalate
Dinoseb
Diphenylamine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pvrene
Isophorone
Isosafrole
Methyl methanesulfonate
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitro-o-toluidine
N-N itrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-N itrosodi-n-butyiamine
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Average Emlaalon Factor (lb/lb)
9.9E-07
9.9E-07
4.3E-06
4.gE-oe
2.5E-07
3-1 E-07
3.0E-06
2.5E-07
9.9E-07
i.6E-oe
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
1.4E-06
3.6E-06
2.5E-07
2.5E-05
2.gE-07
25E-07
5.4E-07
3.1 E-07
7.gE-07
2.eE-05
1.7E-05
2.5E-07
2.eE-07
3.7E-07
4.9E-06
3.0E-07
3.2E-07
3.2E-07
4.9E-07
3.0E-07
2.5E-07
3.6E-07
2.5E-07
4.9E-06
1.3E-06
4.9E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
3.1 E-07
2.9E-07
1.5E-06
3.6E-07
4.gE-06
2.7E-07
3.6E-07
2.7E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
2.7E-07
6.0E-06
2.8E-07
3.9E-06
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
4.3E-07
TABLE 3-5
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CONSERVATIVE" EMISSION FACTORS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 3 OF 6
Analyte
N-N itrosomethy leth vlamine
N-Nitroeomorphoiine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrroikline
o-Toluidine
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safroie
DIoxInt/Furans
2.3,7,8-TCDD
1.2,3.7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1.2.3.4.6,7.&-HpCDD
OCDD
2.3,7.&-TCDF
1,2,3.7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3.6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3,4.6,7.8-HxCDF
1,2,3.7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3.4,6.7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
Carbonylt
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
AcetakJehyde
Acetone
Benzaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Hexanal
Isopentanal
m.p-Tolualdehvde
MEK/Butyraldehydes
o-Tolualdehyde
Pentanal
Propanal
HCI/CI2/NH3
HCl
CI2
NH3
HCN
Avenge Emission Factor (lb/lb)
4.1 E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
3.2E-06
2.5E-07
2.7E-07
2.5E-07
2.5E-07
1.2E-05
2.5E-07
3.6E-07
i.iE-oe
2.6E-07
3.6E-07
2.5E-07
8.8E-13
2.1 E-12
1.6E-12
2.3E-12
1.9E-12
7.9E-12
1.1E-11
i.eE-ii
3.2E-11
6.3E-11
1.2E-10
6.9E-11
7.7E-11
5.2E-11
3.6E-10
9.2E-11
2.7E-10
1.2E-05
5.1 E-05
1.7E-05
6.4E-06
6.2E-06
1.3E-05
6.7E-06
6.2E-06
6.2E-06
8.3E-06
1-6E-05
9.2E-06
2.3E-05
7.7E-03
5.7E-03
1.7E-05
9.5E-06
TABLE 3-5
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CONSERVATIVE" EMISSION FACTORS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 4 OF 6
Analyt*
VOCs
TNMOC
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trimethylbdnzena
1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichioroethane
1,2-DJchloropropane
1,3.5-Trimethvlbenzene
1,3-Butadiena
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Diethylbenzene
1,4-Dich lorobenzene
1.4-Diethylbenzene
1,4-Dioxane
1-Butane
1-Hexene
1-Pentene
2,2,4-Trimethy Ipentane
2,2-Dimethvlbutane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Ethyltoluene
2-Hexanone
2-M0thyiheptane
2-Methylhexane
2-Methylpentane
2-Nrtropropane
2-Propanol
3-Ch loropropene
3-Ethyltoluene
3-Methylheptane
3-Methy1hexane
3-Methylpentane
4-Ethvltoluene
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acelytane
Acrylonitrile
alpha-Chiorotoluene
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Butane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroacetonitrile
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Average Emission Fsctor (lb/lb)
5.1 E-04
3.9E-07
1.8E-07
3.2E-07
1.4E-07
1.9E-07
1.8E-07
5.5E-07
2.1 E-06
3.9E-07
2.1 E-07
2.4E-07
1.6E-07
e.9E-07
5.7E-06
1.9E-07
2.2E-07
3.2E-07
2.9E-07
2.8E-07
1 .OE-05
8.2E-05
5.2E-06
6.0E-07
3.8E-07
1.3E-07
9.5E-07
9.3E-07
4.8E-07
2.1 E-06
1.9E-07
3.8E-07
6.5E-07
1.0E-06
3.2E-05
9.7E-07
1.3E-07
2.3E-06
1.1 E-06
6.6E-07
1.2E-06
2.1 E-06
i.gE-oe
3.0E-07
9.4E-06
7.9E-06
5.0E-CI5
7.1 E-06
2.5E-07
2.5E-05
3.4E-07
5.5E-07
2.7E-07
8.1 E-06
4.0E~06
8.8E-06
5.0E-07
1.1 E-06
1.1 E-07
3.0E-06
7.4E-06
TABLE 3-5
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CONSERVATIVE" EMISSION FACTORS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 5 OF 6
Analyte
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
cis-l ,3-D(chloropropene
cis-2-Butene
cis-2-Pentene
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Cyclopentane
Decane
Dibromochloromethane
Ethane
Ethanol
Ethene
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Ether
Ethyl Methacrylate
Freon 11
FfEon 113
Freon 114
Freon 12
Heptane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
Isobutane
Isopentane
Isoprene
m.p-Xylene
Methacrylonitriie
Methyl Acrylate
Methvl Methacrylate
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Methyk^yclohexane
Methylcyclopentane
Methylene Chloride
n-Butylchloride
Nonane
Octane
o-Xylene
Pentane
Propane
Propyibenzene
Propylene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
trans-1,2-DKhloroethene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-2-butene
trans-2-Pentene
Trichloroethene
Undecane
Vinyl Chloride
CEM
C02
CO
Ha
NOX
302
Avsrags Emiasion Factor (lb/lb)
2.0E-07
3.7E-07
9.0E-07
1.4E-07
1-8E-07
7.9E-07
6.8E-07
7.2E-06
3.8E-07
1.1 E-05
5.6E-07
1.0E-04
1.3E-06
1.1 E-06
7.0E-07
2.1 E-07
4.5E-07
6.5E-07
1.1 E-07
3.0E-06
7.4E-07
3.6E-06
8.5E-07
7.1 E-06
1.8E-07
4.6E-06
1.6E-06
5.3E-07
6-8E-07
1.8E-07
2.0E-06
1.5E-06
3.6E-06
5.0E-06
5.1E-0e
3.4E-06
1.7E-06
8.4E-06
4.2E-06
3.7E-07
2.7E-05
3.2E-07
1.1 E-06
4.3E-07
9.4E-06
3.2E-07
2.7E-07
3.4E-06
3.3E-07
4.1 E-07
4.7E-06
2.2E-06
6.1E-01
3.8E-03
5.7E-05
5.5E-03
1.7E-04
CEM - continuous emissions monitoring
CS - 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile
HCN - hydrogen cyanide
TABLE 3-5
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
'CONSERVATIVE" EMISSION FACTORS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 6 OF 6
Analyts Average Emission Fsctor (lb/lb)
SVOC - semi-volatile organic compounds
VOC - volatile organic compounds
HCL - hydrogen chloride
NOX - nitrogen oxide
S02 - sulfur dioxide
CO - carbon monoxide
C02 - carbon dioxide
TNMOC - total non-methane organic carbon
OCDD - 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctachlorDdibenzo-p-dioxin
OCDF - 1,2.3,4.6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-furan
CL2 - chlorine
NH3-ammonia
PMIO - particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter
PM2.5 - particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter
TABLE 3-6
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CORRECTED" EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 1 OF 6
Analyte
Particulates
TSP
PMIO
PM2.5
Metals
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Perchlorates
SVOCs
1,2,4,5-Tetrach lorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Diphenyihydrazine
1 .S.&'Trinitrobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
1,4-Dlchlorobenzene
1 -Chloronaphthalene
1-Naphthylamine
2,3,4,e-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol
2,4,e-Trich lorophenoi
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Acetylaminofluorene
2-Chloronaphlhalene
2-Chlorophenol
2'M9thy}naph0jaian»
2-Methylphenol
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
Average Emission Factor (lb/lb)
9-5E-02
6-7E-02
3-4E-02
2.7E-02
1.2E-05
1.7E-07
2.5E-06
5.7E-08
1.6E-07
9.7E-06
1.7E-07
80E-06
1.OE-05
9.3E-06
2.5E-05
2.0E-08
1-8E-05
6-9E-05
8.2E-07
3.9E-07
1.1 E-06
7.2E-06
1.3E-07
1.4E-07
1.7E-07
1.5E-07
1.4E.07
1.4E-07
1.6E-07
1.5E-07
1.5E.07
1.5E-07
2.9E-06
1.9E-07
3.7E-07
5.4E-07
3-5E-07
1.8E-06
6.3E-06
1.5E-07
2.4E-07
2.2E-07
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
8.7E-07
14E-0e
8.eE-07
2.9E-06
1.4E-07
1.7E-07
TABLE 3-6
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CORRECTED" EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 2 OF 6
Analyts
3,3'-Dlchlorobenzidine
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
3-Methylcholanthrene
3-Methylphenol & 4-Methylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-Aminobiphenyl
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anth racane
Benzo{a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo{k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Carbazole
Chrysene
CS
Dibenz(a,h]anthrac8ne
Dibenzofuran
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dinoseb
Diphenylamine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
lndeno{1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isosafrole
MeUiyl methanesulfonate
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitro-o-toluidine
N-N itrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Average Emission Factor (lb/lb)
2.1 E-06
1.4E-05
1.4E-07
5.eE-07
5.8E-07
2.5E.06
2.9E-06
1.4E-07
1.8E-07
i.7E-oe
1.4E-07
5.SE-07
9.5E-07
1.5E-07
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
1.2E-06
2.1E-0e
1.4E-07
1.5E-05
1.7E-07
1.4E-07
3.2E-07
1.8E-07
4.6E-07
2.7E-05
1.OE-05
1.4E-07
1.6E-07
2.2E-07
2.gE-06
1.8E-07
1.7E-07
1.8E-07
2.9E-07
1.7E-07
1.5E-07
2.2E-07
1.4E-07
2.9E-06
1.2E-0e
2.8E-07
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
2.3E-07
2.1 E-07
i.7E-oe
2.1 E-07
2.9E-06
1.6E-07
2.5E-07
1.eE-07
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
l.eE-07
6.0E-06
l.eE-07
2.3E-06
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
TABLE 3-«
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CORRECTED" EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 3 OF 6
Analyte
N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiptienylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitro&opyrroiidine
o-Toluidine
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safroie
DIoxins/Furans
2,3,7.8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1.2,3,6.7,8-HxCDD
1.2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1.2,3.4,e,7.8-HpCDD
OCDD
2.3,7,8-TCDF
1.2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3.4,7,8-PeCDF
1.2,3,4,7,e-HxCDF
1,2,3.6,7.8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6.7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1.2,3,4.6,7,8-HpCDF
1.2,3.4,7,8.9-HpCDF
OCDF
Carbonyls
2,5-DimethvlbenzaMehyde
Acetaldebyde
Acetone
Benzaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Hexanal
Isopentanal
m,p-Tolualdehyde
MEK/Butyraldehydes
o-Tolualdehyde
Pentanal
Propanal
HCI/CI2/NH3
HCl
CI2
NH3
HCN
Average Emission Factor (lb/lb)
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
2.5E-07
2.4E-07
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
1.8E-06
1.4E-07
2.1 E-07
1.4E-07
1.4E-07
7.2E-06
1.4E-07
3.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.5E-07
2.1 E-07
1.4E-07
5.8E-13
2.0E-12
1.3E-12
2.1 E-12
1.7E-12
7.8E-12
1.1 E-11
1.6E-11
3.2E-11
6.3E-11
1.2E-10
6.9E-11
7.7E-11
5.2E-11
3.6E-10
9.2E-11
2.6E-10
7.2E-06
2.9E-05
e.5E-06
4.3E-06
3.6E-0e
1.1 E-05
4.6E-06
3.6E-06
3.6E-06
7.2E-06
1.3E-05
5.5E-06
1.4E-05
8.1 E-03
3.3E-04
1.3E-05
6.5E-06
TABLE 3-6
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
'CORRECTED" EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 4 OF 6
Analyte
VOCs
TNMOC
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trlmethylbenzene
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1,2-Dichlorot)enzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3,5-Trlmethylbenzene
1,3-Butadiene
1,3-DichlQrob6nzene
1,3-Diethylbenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Diethylbenzene
1,4-Dioxane
1-Butene
1-Hexene
1-Pentene
2,2,4-Trimethvlpentane
2,2-Dimethvlbutane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
2,4-Diniethylpentsne
2-Butanone (MEK)
2-Ethvltoluene
2-Hexanone
2-Methylheptane
2-MethyJhexane
2-Methylpentane
2-Nitropropane
2-Propanol
3-Ch loropropene
3-Ethyltoluene
3-Methylheptane
3-Methylhexane
3-Methylpentane
4-Ethyltoluene
4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetylene
Acrylonitrile
alpha-Chtorotoluene
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromofomi
Bromomethane
Butane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroacetonitrile
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Average Emission Factor (lb/lb)
3.8E-04
2.3E-07
1.1 E-07
1.8E-07
8.0E-08
1.1 E-07
1.1 E-07
3.2E-07
2.1 E-08
2.2E-07
1.2E-07
1.4E-07
9.2E-08
6.4E-07
4.7E-06
1.1 E-07
1.3E-07
1.8E-07
1.7E-07
1.5E-07
9.0E-06
6.2E-06
5.1 E-06
5.5E-07
2.2E-07
7.3E-08
7.6E-07
7.9E-07
2.8E-07
2.2E-06
1.1 E-07
2.2E-07
5.0E-07
8.9E-07
3.2E-06
7.0E-07
7.5E-08
2.3E-06
1.0E-06
5.5E-07
1.1 E-06
2.0E-06
l.gE-06
l.eE-07
B.9E-06
4.3E-06
3.1 E-05
3.9E-06
1.4E-07
2.2E-05
2.0E-07
3.2E-07
1.6E-07
8.1 E-06
4.0E-06
8.6E-06
2.0E-O7
1.0E-06
6.4E-08
TABLE 3-6
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CORRECTED" EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 5 OF 8
Analyte
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
cis-1,3-Dichlor(^roper)e
cis-2-Butene
cis-2-Pentene
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Cyclopentane
Decane
Dibromochloromethane
Ethane
Ethanol
Ethene
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Ether
Ethyl Methacrylate
Freon 11
Freon 113
Freon 114
Freon 12
Heptane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
Isobutane
Isopentane
Isoprene
m, p-Xylene
Methacrylonitriie
Methyl Acrylate
Methyl Methacrylate
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Methylcyclohexane
Methylcyclopentane
Methylene Chloride
n-Butylchloride
Nonane
Octane
o-Xylene
Pentane
Propane
Propyltwnzene
Propylene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-2-butene
trans-2-Pentene
Trichloroethene
Undecane
Vinyl Chloride
CEM
C02
CO
HCl
NOX
802
Average Emlttlon Factor (lb/lb)
3.1 E-06
7.2E-06
1.2E-07
3.1 E-07
6.5E-07
8.3E-08
1.1 E-07
7.7E-07
4.8E-07
7.2E-06
2.2E-07
9.3E-06
5.2E-07
6.6E-05
i.3E-oe
6.3E-07
4.0E-07
1.2E-07
2.6E-07
3.8E-07
6.1 E-08
2.0E-O6
4.3E-07
3.6E-06
6.3E-07
7.1 E-06
1.0E-07
4.4E-06
1.4E-06
3.0E-07
3.9E-07
1-0E-07
2.0E-06
1.4E-06
3-7E-06
2.9E-06
5.1 E-06
3.3E-06
1.7E-06
8.4E-06
4.1 E-06
3.0E-07
2.1 E-05
2.7E-07
1.1 E-06
3.4E-07
8.8E-06
1.8E-07
1.5E-07
3-4E-06
2.7E-07
3.1 E-07
4.6E-06
2.2E-06
5.7E-01
1.8E-03
6.1 E-05
2-6E-03
1-2E-04
TABLE 3-6
1.3 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
"CORRECTED" EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 6 OF 6
Analyts Avsrags Emission Factor (lb/lb)
CEM - continuous emissions monitoring
CS - 2-chk)robenzalmak)nonitrile
HCN - hydrogen cyanide
SVOC - semi-volatile organic compounds
VOC - volatile organic compounds
TABLE 3-7
1.1 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 1 OF 7
Analyte
Particulates
PMIO
Total Suspended Particulate (TSP)
MeUls
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Bervllium
Cadmium
Chrctmium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Thallium (L)
Zinc
SVOCs
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetic acid
Acetophenone
Acetylamlnofluorene,-2
Aminobiphenyl,-4
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a) pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzonitrile
Benzyl Alcohol
Benzyl chloride
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether (Chloroisopropyl ether, Bis-1,2-)
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Bramophenyl-phenylether;-4
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbazole
Carene, delta 3-
Chloro-3-methyphenol;-4
Chloroaniline; 4-(Chloroaniline, p-)
Chlombenzilate
Average Emission Factor
(lb/lb)
2.0E-02
7.1 E-02
2.5E-03
9.6E-06
1.1 E-07
3.9E-07
5.7E-09
4.7E-08
3.0E-07
1.2E-07
1.2E-05
4.0E-06
8.5E-07
1.5E-08
8.2E-07
1.9E-05
6.7E-08
8.2E-08
1.4E-07
5.6E-05
5.0E-08
3.1 E-06
1.OE-05
2.7 E-07
1.7E-07
1.2E-07
7.3E-08
1.3E-07
3.0E-06
5.9E-07
7.7E-08
1.1 E-06
4.5E-07
1.1E-06
3.2E-05
5.6E-06
7.8E-07
1.6E-07
8.eE-oe
1.2E-06
1.1 E-07
1.5E-07
8.7E-08
3.5E-08
7.5E-08
1.5E-a7
5.8E-08
TABLE 3-7
1.1 CLASS WASTE MATERiAL
EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 2 OF 7
Analyte
Chloronaphthalene, -1
Chlorophenol;-2
Chlorophenyl-phenyIelher;-4
Chrysene
Decanal
Decane, n-
Diallate
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Dichlorobenzene; 1,2- (Dichlorobenzene, o-)
Dichlorobenzene; 1,3- (Dichlorobenzene, m-)
Dichlorobenzene; 1,4- (Dichlorobenzene, p-)
Dichlorobenzidine; 3,3'-
Dichlorophenol, 2,6-
Dichlorophenol; 2,4-
Diethylphthalate
Dimethylaminoazobenzene, p-
Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 7,12-
Dimethylbenzidine, 3,3'- (ortho-tolidine)
Dimethylphenethylamine, alpha,alpha-
Dimethylphenol, 2,4-
Dimethylphthalate
Dinitro-2-methylphenol; 4,6-
Dinitrobenzene, 1,3- (M-Dinitrobenzene)
Dinitrophenol; 2,4-
Oinitrotoluene; 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene; 2,6-
Di-n-octylphthalate
Diphenylamine; N,N-
Diphenylhydrazine; 1,2-
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane (Perchloroethane)
Hexachloropropene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isosafrole
Kepone
Limonene, d-
Methyl furan, -2
Methyl methanesulfonate
Methyl phenol; 3-/Methyl phenol, -4
MethyIcholanthrene, -3
Methylheptane, -2
Methylnaphthalene, -1
Methylnaphthalene, -2
Methylphenol; -2 (o-Cresol)
Naphthalene
Average Emission Factor
(lb/lb)
9.9E-08
4.8E-07
6.0E-08
7.2E-07
1.8E-06
8.6E-05
1.0E-07
1.0E-07
2.1 E-07
1.9E-07
1.9E-07
1.9E-07
1.4E-07
8.5E-08
1.4E-07
2.4E-07
1.5E-07
7.2 E-07
4.8E-07
1.9E-06
7.8E-07
3.5E-08
4.8E-07
3.8E-07
2,7E-06
1.2E-07
2.0E-07
9.1 E-08
1.2E-07
3.5E-08
1.7E-07
2.6E-06
6.5E-07
6.1 E-08
3.3E-07
2.3E-07
2.2E-07
1.7E-07
4.0E-07
1.5E-07
4.2E-07
7.3E-07
3.5E-08
2.4E-06
2.6E-07
2.6E-07
6.7E-07
2.4E-05
6.3E-06
7.5E-06
1.5E-07
9.2E-05
TABLE 3-7
1.1 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 3 OF 7
Analyte
Naphthoquinone, 1,4-
Naphthylamine, -1
Naphthylamine, -2
Nitroaniline; -2
Nitn^niline; -3
Nitroaniline; -4
Nitrobenzene
Nitro-o-toluidine, -5
Nitrophenol; -2
Nitrophenol; -4
Nitroquinoline-1-oxide, -4
Nitrosodiethylamine, N-
Nitroso-di-n-butylamine, N-
N itrosomethy lethy lam ine, N-
Nitrosomorpholine, N-
Nitrosopiperidine, N-
Nitrosopyn-olidine, N-
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB)
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Picoline, -2
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safroie
Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5-
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluidine, o-
Toluidine, p-
Trichlorophenol; 2,4,5-
Trichlorophenol; 2,4,6-
Dioxins/Furans
HEPTACDD, 1,2,3.4,6,7,8-(1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin)
HEPTACDF, 1.2,3.4,7.8,9- (1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran)
HEPTACDF, (1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorinated Dibenzofuran)
HEXACDD, 1,2,3,4,7,8- (1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin)
HEXACDD, 1.2,3.6,7.8- (1.2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodivenzo-p-dioxin)
HEXACDD, 1,2,3,7,8,9- (1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin,
HEXACDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8-(1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorinated Dibenzofuran)
HEXACDF, 1,2,3,6,7,8-(1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran)
HEXACDF, 1,2,3,7,8,9-(1,2,3,7,e,9-Hexachlorinated Dibenzofuran)
HEXACDF, 2,3,4,6,7,8-(2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorinated Dibenzofuran)
OCTACDD, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-(1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin)
OCTACDF, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-(1,2,3.4,6,7.e,9-Octachlorodibenzofuran)
Average Emission Factor
(lb/lb)
2.7E-07
5.5E-08
2.6E-07
1.3E-07
6.3E-07
8.1 E-07
1.1 E-07
2.8E-07
4.7E-06
6.8E-07
2.5E-06
1.2E-07
1.6E-07
5.6E-07
1.3E-07
1.3E-07
3.8E-07
3.2E-07
9.7E-08
1.0E-07
7.0E-07
5.8E-07
4.9E-07
8.6E-0e
3.2E-06
3.0E-06
3.6E-07
2.0E-07
2.3E-06
3.1 E-07
1.6E-07
6.6E-08
4.1 E-07
4.8E-07
1.8E-07
2.8E-07
1.6E-07
1.5E-07
2.9E-11
5.0E-11
1.1E-11
9.9E-12
9.1E-12
8.8E-12
4.0E-11
1.5E-11
1.8E-11
7.4E-12
6.2E-11
6.8E-11
TABLE 3-7
1.1 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 4 OF 7
Analyte
PENTACDD. 1,2,3,7,8- (1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin)
PENTACDF. 1,2,3,7,8- (1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodlbenzofuran)
PENTACDF, 2,3,4,7,8- (2,3,4,7,8-Penlachlorodiben2ofuran)
TCDD, 2,3,7,8- (2,3,7,8-Telrachloro Dibenzo-p-dioxin)
TETRACDF, 2,3,7,8- (2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran)
Cart>onyis
Acetaldebyde
Benzaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde (Butenal, trans-2-)
Furfural (Furaldehyde, 2-)
Heptanal
Hexanal
Pentanal
Propionaldehyde (Propanal)
HCl
Chlorine
VOCs
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetylene
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Allylchloride
Benzene
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Butadiene, 1,3-
Butane.l- (Butane.n-)
Butene, l-(Ethylethylene)
Butene, ci3-2- (butene. (Z)-2-;dimethylethylene)
Butene, l-(butvlene)
Butene, trans-2-(butene,(E)-2-)
Carton Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorobromomethane
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
Chloromethane (Methly chloride)
Cyclohexane (hexamethylene)
Cyclopentane
Cyclopentene
Dibromoethane, 1,2- (ethylene dibromide)
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichloroethane; 1,1-
Dichloroethane; 1,2- (Ethylene dichloride)
Dichloroethene, 1,2-
Dich loromethane (Methylene chloride)
Dichloropropane; 1.2-
Dichlorotetrafl uoroethane
Dimethylbutane, 2,2- (neohexane)
Average Emission Factor
(lb/lb)
3.2E-12
6.1 E-12
1.8E-11
6.3E-11
3.2E-10
3.7E-06
3.8E-05
3.2E-06
7.2E-06
9.5E-06
8.8E-06
3.9E-05
2.8E-06
1.4E-02
3.1 E-05
1.4E-05
8.6E-07
2.4E-04
8.6E-06
8.1 E-07
9.6E-08
1.2E-04
1.2E-07
1.2E-07
2.2E-06
2.0E-06
1.4E-06
1.8E-05
5.8E-06
8.5E-07
4.9E-07
4.3E-07
3.8E-07
8.1 E-07
2.4E-06
6.8E-07
1.2E-06
2.4E-07
1.0E-06
1.2E-07
1.2E-07
1.2E-07
2.4E-04
1.4E-07
2.2E-07
1.4E-06
TABLE 3-7
I.t CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 5 OF 7
Analyte
Dimethylbutane, 2,3- (isohexane)
Dimethylheptane, 2,2-
Dimethylhexane, 2,3-
Dimethyl hexane, 2,4-
Dimethylhexane, 2,5-
DJmethylpentane, 2,3-
Dimethylpentane, 2,4-
Dimethylpropane, 2,2-
Ethane
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane)
Ethylcyclohexane
Ethylene (acetene)
Ethyl hexane, -3
Ethyltoluene, m-
Ethyltoluene, o-
Ethyltoluene, p-
Heptane, n-
Heptanone, -2
Hexane,
Hexanone; -2
Hexene, -1 (butyl ethylene)
Hexene, cls-2-
Hexene, lrans-2-
Isoprene
Meth acrolein
Methacrylonitriie
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methvl isobutyl ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
Methy 1-1-butene, -2
Methyl-I-butene, -3
Methyl-1-pentene, -2
Methyl-1-pentene, -4
Methyl-2-butene, -2 (trimethylethylene)
Methvl-2-pentene. -2
Methyl-2-pentene, cis-4-
Methylcvclohexane
Methylcyclopentane
Methylhexane, -2 (isoheptane)
Methylhexane, -3
Methyl nitrite
Methylpentane, -2 (isohexane)
Methvlpentane, -
Methylpropanenitrile, -2
Nitromethane
Nonanal
Nonane, N-
Octanal
Octane, N-
Pentane, n- (pentane, i)
Pentanone, -2
Average Emission Factor
fib/lb)
3.5E-06
3.5E-0e
4.3E-06
2.4E-06
1.9E-06
1.4E-05
5.2E-06
3.5E-08
5.8E-06
1.1 E-05
4.4E-07
3.5E-08
1.7E-04
2.0E-05
6.1 E-06
3.9E-06
8.2E-06
1.8E-05
1.5E-06
6.0E-06
2.0E-06
1.1 E-05
3.4E-07
6.4E-07
5.1 E-08
1.6E-06
5.9E-06
7.5E-07
8.2E-07
1.3E-05
1.7E-06
7.6E-07
3.5E-08
3.5E-08
6.3E-07
6.8E-07
3.5E-08
1.2E-05
2.3E-06
1.7E-05
2.2E-05
5.3E-06
7.3E-06
4.7E-06
8.7E-08
9.2E-06
4.3E-06
3.7E-05
5.5E-0e
8.4E-05
3.1 E-05
7.1 E-06
TABLE 3-7
1.1 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 6 OF 7
Analyte
Pentene, -1
Pentene, cis-2- (pentene, (Z)-2-)
Pentene, tran8-2- (pentene, (E)-2-)
Pheny lacetylene
Pinene, alpha-
Pinene, beta-
Propane (dimethylmethane)
Propanoic acid
Propene (methylethylene; methylethene)
Propyibenzene, n- (propyl benzene; isocumene; Propylbenzine, i-)
Styrene
Tetrachloroethane; 1,1,1,2-
Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene)
Toluene
Trich lorot>enzene; 1,2,4-
Trichloroethane; 1,1,1- (MethyIchloroform)
Trichloroethane; 1,1,2-
Trlchloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
TrimethyH-pentene, 2,4,4-
Trimethyl-2-penlene, 2,4,4-
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- & sec-Butylbenzene
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
Trimethylhexane, 2,2,4-
Trimelhylpentane, 2,2,4-
Trimethylpentane, 2,3,4-
Trinitrobenzene, 1,3,5- (TNB; Trinitrobenzene sym-)
Undecanal
Vinyl Chloride (Chloroethene)
Xylene, m-
Xylene, m & p (m & p-dimethylbenzene)
Xylene, o-(o-dimethylbenzene; Dimethylbenzene, 1,2-)
CEM
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) NOx
Average Emission Factor
(lb/lb)
5.6E-06
7.0E-07
9.6E-07
9.0E-06
3.SE-08
3.5E-08
6.0E-06
6.1 E-07
4.4E-05
4.6E-06
1,3E-06
2.1 E-07
2.4E-07
2.8E-05
2.3E-07
2.7E-07
1.7E-07
1.7E-07
7.3E-07
3.5E-08
3.5E-08
2.5E-05
2.6E-05
1.9E-05
9.7E-06
2.0E-05
8.2E-06
2.9E-07
2.1 E-07
1.4E-07
2.1 E-05
2.2E-05
1.3E-05
1.1E+00
7.4E-03
5.1 E-03
CEM - continuous emissions monitoring
CS - 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile
HCN - hydrogen cyanide
SVOC - semi-volatile organic compounds
VOC - volatile organic compounds
HCL - hydrogen chloride
NOX - nitrogen oxide
S02 - sulfur dioxide
CO - carbon monoxide
002 - carbon dioxide
TNMOC - total non-methane organic carbon
OCDD - 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,g-Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
OCDF - 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-furan
CL2 - chlorine
TABLE 3-7
1.1 CLASS WASTE MATERIAL
EMISSION FACTOR DATA SET
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
PAGE 7 OF 7
Analyte Average Emission Factor
(lb/lb)
NH3 - ammonia
PM10 - particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter
TABLE 3-8
CATEGORY E EMISSION FACTORS FOR
ATK FLARE-TYPE WASTES
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
Analyte
Particulates
PM-2.5
PM-10
Total suspended particulate
Metals
Arsenic
Cadmium
Manganese
Zinc
AP-42 Emission Factor^'^ (lb/lb)
8.9E-03
1.2E-02
1.2E-02
i.4E-oa
2.8E-05
4.1 E-08
4.6E-07
SVOCs
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dioxin/Furans
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1,2,3,4,7,8.9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
Carbonyls
Acetaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Propionaldehyde
Ammonia
VOCs
Acetonitrile
Acrvlonitrile
Benzene
Chloromethane
Ethylene
Propylene
Toluene
Total nonmethane hydrocarbons
1,3-Butadiene
Explosives
Nitroglycerin
CEM
Carbon dioxide
Carbon monoxide
Oxides of nitrogen
Sulfur dioxide
9.6E-08
2.4E-07
2.0E-07
2.1E-12
1.2E-13
1.5E-13
1.9E-13
8.3E-14
9.4E-14
5.0E-12
7.7E-14
1.3E-13
3,6E-06
1.8E-06
1.1 E-07
1.7E-06
1.3E-06
3.9E-07
3.2E-06
1.6E-07
9.5E-06
i.6E-oe
3.3E-07
2.4E-05
1.1 E-07
3.0E-07
3.0E-02
5.4E-04
3.5E-04
6.0E-06
^ - Emission factors based on U.S. AP-42, Section 15.3.22, C484, M816 81-mm Infrared
Illumination Cartridge.
^ - Emission factors units converted to lbs/lb based on the weight of a single, C484. M816 81'
mm Infrared Illumination Cartridge (9.25 Ibs) using a conversion factor of 0.106.
Reul
4.0 AIR QUALITY MODELING METHODOLOGY
This section describes the methodology to assess the air quality impact of the M-136 and M-225
treatment units in the air dispersion modeling analysis. To the extent possible, the air dispersion
modeling methodology is designed to follow the procedures recommended in the HHRAP guidance
(USEPA, 2005) and direction received from UDEQ. As a result, this protocoUnay include slight variations
from the HHRAP protocol. Every effort has made to identify these varjailiBS and to present supporting
information to justify the protocol.
The following components of the modeling protocol are discus^ IR this secti
Air Quality Dispersion Model Selection - Sectior
Land Use Analysis - Section 4.2
Surface Roughness - Section 4.3
OB/OD Treatment Scenarios - Secti(
Deposition Modeling - Section 4.5
Receptor Networks - Section 4.6
Meteorological Data - Si
Comparison to Air QralS^Stan^Si^ and Exi
Post-Processino^i^Vities - SectidB.9
4.1
Criteria-Section 4.8
Air di
treat'
com bus
dispersion
sources associa
(USEPA, 2005) gul
case basis.
)e corm&ted to evaluate the impact of emissions from the M-136 and M-225
int td^He that the HHRAP guidance (USEPA, 2005) assumes the
jated ilSing the Industrial Source Complex Short Term 3 (ISCST3)
lent evaluations. However, ISCST3 is considered more applicable to
faciiities, rather than OB and OD treatment operations. The HHRAP
acknowledges that other dispersion models may be required on a case-by-
In the case of waste treatment activities at ATK Promontory, a special model is needed to simulate the
combustion, cloud rise, and dispersion of OB and OD source releases. OB treatment is considered a
quasi-continuous source because the treatment event is usually complete within one hour. OD is
considered as an instantaneous source because treatment is completed within milliseconds. ATK
conducts both OB and OD treatment at M-136 and M-225.
090904/P 4-1
Revi
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) maintains a Support Center for Regulatory
Air Models called SCRAMS. The only SCRAM model that is specific to OB and OD treatment operations
is the Open Burn/Open Detonation Dispersion Model (OBODM) (Cramer, H. E. 2008). OBODM has also
been identified by UDEQ as the model of choice for conducting the ATK air dispersion modeling analysis
in support of the human health and ecological risk assessments. The most recent update to the model
was issued in October 2008 (Version 1.3.24).
OBODM is specifically designed to predict the air quality impact of Q^HIS OD treatment of obsolete
weapons, solid rocket propellants, and manufacturing wastes. ^^0^^rid OD treatment of waste
propellants and propellant contaminated materials at M-1MPSnd ^W|^ can be classified as
instantaneous events for OD treatment and as quasi-contip^flfe events for olBiatment. Because the
model is specifically designed for OB and OD treatmen^fean accommodate soi]f^epecific input data
reganJing treatment operations. This allows the-offlel to provid^detail regardirf|^^ spatial and
temporal variation of emissions and meteorological^RiditionSjj|gFenhances the mooei's ability to
evaluate source impacts.
OBODM predicts the downwind transport
model algorithms taken from existing U.S. t^^ appro'
content of the energetic maumUBAlume nseiOja
model is also desioned J^^Se eith^i^||ppirical
Proving Ground (DP^MiKng box'" orjmissions pr
calculates peak air ^nuitratiOQ^KAWfiiahted
concentratio^^^^^
the gravjyHR^^MnBnd defflstjpn of particulates.
of polluf^g^using plume rise and dispersion
rsion''^IKdels. OBODM uses the heat
o pi^sCQM^ie buoyant rise of the plume. The
bn factors such as those derived in the Dugway
ed by a products of combustion model. OBODM
.concentrations, and dosage (time-integrated
sider the effects on concentration and dosage of
outiJBRbs produced by ISCST3 for input into the risk assessment
ut products of OBODM include the following:
Allows the calQiUion.jnS[f concentration based on a unit emission rate to preclude the use of
multiple model rui i'lHSkch contaminant of potential concern.
Provides output results for specific sources or source groups to evaluate the risk from each source.
Allows the user to evaluate single case or sequential, houriy, preprocessed meteorological databases
ranging from one to 5 years.
090904/P 4-2
Revi
• Allows the user to specify the hours ofthe day in which materials are treated when using a sequential
hourty meteorological database.
* Allows specific input for each source, receptor location, meteorological data, and ten'ain features.
Source parameter data includes effective heat content, burn rate, total mass treated, and pollutant
emission factors. This feature allows the modeling analysis to be tailored to replicate treatment
operations at M-136 and M-225.
As with tSCST3, OBODM can calculate vapor phase and partjaiSn^air concentrations. OBODM
also calculates particle phase deposition based on particie^si^irstribuffQ^Jn this modeling analysis.
vapor phase deposition will be calculated using the
velocity as recommended in Section 3.1.1 ofthe
be calculated using gravitational settling. OBOI
wet deposition mechanism is not applicable at ATF
during precipitation events.
OBODM has additional features that make il&ll
The topography in thej
commonly referred le^y"comDl
air dispersion in^^BPlex terrain
dispersion models (m£HOR
phase air rnrigjatrfltinn and deposition
(USEPA, 2005). PaTOltete deposition will
ite wet deposiu^^H owever, the
bause treatment is not conducted
These features include:
aractSF^B^y significant changes in elevation
M contains a screening procedure for addressing
rocedures used by the other USEPA approved
ises suiniAiunpirica^|%igway Proving Grounds (DPG) dispersion coefficients, which directly
OB plume anTfnf grow^^atmospheric turbulence and wind shear. OBODM also uses the
DPQffitertical dispersion^mfficien^^ich relates vertical OB plume growth to vertical turbulence
IntensiHwbd includes the @m:ts of entrainment during buoyant plume rise.
Land use information is*used for the selection of certain air dispersion modeling variables. These
variables include air dispersion coefficients and surface roughness. The land use characteristics
surrounding a source of air emissions can be determined from United States Geological Service (USGS)
7.5-minute topographic maps, aerial photographs, or visual surveys of the area. The land use
classification for the area surrounding the M-136 and M-225 treatment units was determined from the
Thatcher Mountain 7.5-minute (1:24,000 scale) quadrangle using the Auer method (Auer, 1978), as
described in Section 3.2.2,1 ofthe HHRAP guidance (USEPA, 2005).
090904/P 4-3
Revi
Using this method, areas are defined as either "rural" or 'urban". The Auer method establishes four
primary land use types: industrial, commercial, residential, and agricultural. Industrial, commercial, and
compact residential areas are classified as urban. For air quality modeling purposes, an area is defined
as urban if more than 50 percent of the suriace area within 3 km of the source falls under an urban land
use type. Otherwise, the area is determined to be rural.
A radius of 3 km beyond each treatment unit was inspected to define whethtfyse area within 3 km is rural
or urban acconjing to Auer's definitions. This inspection resulted^^V^rural classification for both
treatment units. Next, the 3 km radius area was broken c^ow^^innailer areas (100 meters by
100 meters). Each small area was then classified either as rurat^^Rrban^Qae. total count of rural areas
was greater than 50 percent surrounding each treatment y^iV^s a result, th^Sbd use classification of
ATK Promontory is rural.
SURFACE ROUGHNESS HEIGHT 4.3
The surface roughness height (length) a
given in Section 3.2.2.2 of the HHRAP gui
and a five-year wind rose for the ATK M-.
calculate site-specific surface^jeaojapess heig
methodology, all wind se
Table 3-3 in the HH
desert shrub land. An
based on tMHRmMbtthe
4.4
In order to
information
requires input data^
OD), the heat content,'
and the release height.
ified as
for this modinn.analysis is based on the methodology
, 20099^^6 results of land use classification
nitoring station were used to
nits. Using the HHRAP guidance
ents seasonal values of surface roughness for
hness height of 0.26 was calculated for ATK
asonal surface roaghness coefficients.
impact of OB and OD treatment operations, OBODM requires specific
ristics of the source of treatment emissions. For example, OBODM
e type of energetic material being treated, how it is being treated (OB or
rate of the material, the amount of notarial being treated, the size source,
The following treatment scenarios will be evaluated in the air dispersion modeling analysis for ATK
treatment operations:
• OB treatment at M-136
• OB treatment at M-225
090g04/P 4-4
Revi
OD treatment at M-136
OD treatment at M-225
The M-136 Unit has 14 treatment stations. OB is conducted at stations 1-12. OB and OD is conducted at
stations 13 and 14. All OB treatment is conducted in pans with the exception of Burn Station 14, which
consists of a pad used for the OB of whole rocket motors. The OD hole or pit is not covered during OD
treatment. Based on quantity distance (QD) limitations, open detonation n]|^^ performed above ground
or underground in a hole or pit, depending on the item to be detonated^
The M-225 Unit has four burn stations and one detonation area. ^I^OD K
OD treatment. Based on QD limitations, open detoryj^p may be pe
underground in a hole or pit, depending on the item to bnlKnated.
Although the OBODM model has the capability to m
same model mn (must have same heat content), the 1
OBODM software code necessitates nii^Hftbinodei runs
precludes the modeling of individual M-136
ATK proposes to consoli
representing either all
of multiple emission
similar release parame^
through 12 atjj-aaR /SPP
radius otrffllWgSng^WfcLof
repraBgytrie treatment
area tratk&imilar materials
height, angBget content). A
pit is not covered during
d above ground or
ce scenarios and locations in the
or per run limitation inherent in the
aluate large receptor networks and
and M-Hfi. tfiHHffient s^raa into a subset of source areas
lent unit^KEPA guidance (USEPA, 1992) allows the merging
bd within l^lkneters of each other, if the emission points have
tuationlHsts for the area comprised of burn stations 1
m stations 1-12 are all located within a 100-meter
comprised of burn stations 1-12. A center point for this area can
conducted at the burn stations 1-12. The burn stations in this
ire asa^ixiBd to have similar release parameters (e.g., pan size, release
proposing to treat stations 13 and 14 as separate emission sources
because of th( separatiojnstance (greater than 100 meters) from stations 1-12 and each other.
ATK is proposing to iJiHRI§at content value of 1,471 cal/gm for 1.3 class materials. This heat content
value was detemiined by ATK using the NASA-Lewis Thermochemical Model. Model calculations were
made for four different compositions of waste materials (PW100, PW85/15, and PW65/35). The goal of
the calculations was to examine theoretical flame temperatures of the propellant and the mixtures. The
heat content values proposed by ATK for 1.3 class materials are based on the PW65/35 NASA-Lewis
calculations. The proposed heat content values for 1.1 and Category E class materials will be determined
from testing currently being performed at ATK.
ogogo4/p 4-5
Revi
The objective of the OBODM modeling analysis will be to evaluate all potential daily operating hours on
an annual basis. ATK conducts only one treatment event per day at both M-136 and M-225. OBODM will
assume that one treatment event takes place each hour within the range of potential daily operating
hours, which is assumed to be between 1000 and 1800 hours. As a result, the frequency of treatment
events modeled will overestimate the expected operations at both M-136 and M-225 on an annual basis.
Post-processing of the modeling results will account for the maximum daily per event treatment quantity
and the maximum annual treatment quantities proposed by ATK in TabJJk 2-1 and 2-2. The post-
processing step is discussed in Section 4.9.
A summary of the source parameters, treatment quantities and
air dispersion modeling analysis for the M-136 and M-225
and 4.4.2, respectively.
4.4.1 M-136 Treatment Unit
it at ATK. The*VIB^6 treatment unit will conduct treatment
sed on th'S^Hsximum annual treatment quantities
s wiiiinnBia percet^SS^the total ATK annual waste in
s that will be used in the
ted in Sections 4.4.1
M-136 is the primary open burning treat
of 1.1 and 1.3 class waste and Category
proposed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2, the M-136
comparison to M-225.
4.4.1.1 M-136 So
The air dispersion modeirH»nalysJ eannt unit will include the following sources:
Sou
Source
Ijegory E waste at stations 1 through 12
ind C^W^ry E waste at Station 13
.waste flflfcluding rocket motors) at Station 14
/aste at Stations 13 and 14 in a single area.
The proposed sourdMhafflS^rs for the M-136 sources are given in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 also shows the
proposed per event tre^Plnt quantities that will be used in OBODM for each M-136 source, as well as
the proposed maximum annual treatment quantity for each M-136 source.
4.4.1.2 Other Modeling Assumptions for M-136
OBODM will be setup to assume the following about treatment activities at M-136:
0g0904/P 4-6
Revi
Assume that all M-136 sources are at the same base elevation as BS 1-12, Elevation = 4,587 feet in
order to consolidate gravitational settling modeling due to the limited number of receptors that can be
evaluated per njn of OBODM. The actual net elevation difference between the three source locaiions
is only 36 feet (11 meters). Therefore, this assumption is not expected to affect the modeling results
for M-136.
Include all four M-136 sources in single OBODM njn. However,
coordinate (x,y) location reflecting its relative position within M-i
a source group to give the individual contribution from each
1.3, and Category E).
Each OB source dimensions wil) be based on the
will assume a pit diameter of 1.5 meters.
urce will have a separate
ach source will be assign to
eceptor and waste type (1.1,
ingle OD source
• Release height for OB = 1.0 meters forjyarn stations
for burn station 14 (pad).
• OBODM will assume one treatment even
treatment hours modettiHnKach M-1
3,285 hours/year.
• OB source release
. A height of 2.0 meters is assumed
00 to 1800. The total annual
hours/day x 365 days/year =
OB^Mwill assume thaSBjatmennBtVs include all days of the year in order to calculate the worst-
case 1-T^B^air dispersion ^^rs at each receptor for each annual period.
Gas and particclH^i^^^odeling will utilize a unit emission rate of 1.0 Ib/hr as recommended by
the HHRAP (USEPHPo5).
Particulate phase modeling will include particle size information to include gravitational settling (see
Section 4.5) as recommended by HHRAP guidance (USEPA, 2005).
0g09O4/P 4-7
Revi
4.4.2 M-225 Treatment Unit Sources
The M-225 Unit will treat small amounts of 1.1 and 1.3 class waste and Category E waste. OB will be
conducted in burn pans. OD treatment of pure propellant will be conducted at one OD pit. OD treatment
consists of placing the waste material in a small, excavated pit that has a diameter of 1.5 meters. The
treatment pit is not covered with soil and is considered as a surface detonation. Based on QD limitations,
open detonation may be performed above ground or underground in a hole^ pit, depending on the item
to be detonated.
As shown in Figure 2-6, the M-225 burn pans and OD pit aciffi^te^Siithin a 200 foot x 500 foot
rectangular area. All M-225 treatment locations are within BOA^ters of the ^BBS of this treatment area
and there are no significant changes in elevation. In^gnTderation of the sri'^^eparation distance
between the M-225 burn pans and the OD pit an<^MP^milaritv in materials trearanLthis unit, it is
proposed that M-225 treatment activities witl be modelQj^ a singl^nJBtsion source forwih OB and OD
treatment.
4.4.2.1 M-225 Source Parameters
4.4.2.2
The air dispersion modeling increroe the following sources:
• Source 1 - OB of
• Source 2 - OD o
The propostf^^BSSaJoaram
propos^^? event tTSI|^nt q
the dPSSsed maximum ai^mtreat
are given in Table 4-2. Table 4-2 also shows the
that will be used in OBODM for each M-225 source, as well as
luantity for each M-225 source.
Modeling Anmiptions for M-225
OBODM will be s^ the following about treatment activities at M-225:
Both sources (OB and OD) have the same coordinate and elevation; elevation = 4,597 feet above
mean sea level to consolidate gravitational settling modeling for both sources in a single model run.
Each source configuration is based on average pan size:
> For OD at M225, assume 1.5 meter diameter pit
> For OB at M225, average dimension of pans = 6' x 17'
ogogo4/p 4-8
Release height for OB = 1.0 meters
Release height for CD = 0 meters (ground level)
08 source release quasi-continuous (volume source)
Rev1
• OD source release instantaneous (volume source)
• Gas and particulate phase modeling will be conducted usi
recommended by HHRA guidance (USEPA, 2005).
• Assume 1 treatment event per hour
• Assume treatment window runs from 1000 to 180
be = 9 X 365 = 3,285 hours/year.
• Treatment days include all days of the
factor for each source in each annual
ission rate of 1.0 Ib/hr as
ual treatment hours modeled will
worst-case 1-hour air dispersion
Particulate phase raSSfing will iritttae particl^&e information to include gravitational settling (see
Section 4.5) as r^Knended bv lIBiAP guida^uUSEPA, 2005).
The j^ffipTwill address IFMHCV de^BSBon of particulate phase (gravitational settling) and gas phase (non-
gravitOTftal settling) pollutamjrom'^fticnent operations at M-136 and M-225. The HHRA will not
address v^Bwposition becau^R^TK does not conduct treatment operations during precipitation events.
The sum of traBb^|^o depositaBmechanisms is assumed to represent total dry deposition. Therefore,
the total annual di^MopsifcujMPl be computed as follows:
Total Dry Deposition (pg/mVyr) = gravitational settling + Non-gravitational settling (pg/m^/yr)
4.5.1 Particulate Phasa Dry Deposition
OBODM has the capability to calculate gravitational settling of particulates when run in the particulate
mode (e.g., all emissions are assumed to be particulates). The input requirements for OBODM
particulate deposition modeling include particle size distribution, median particle size, and specific gravity
090g04/P 4-9
Revi
for calculating the gravitational settling velocity of a particle. In the absence of particle size information for
ATK treatment units, altemate sources of particle size information have been considered to establish
input parameters for OBODM deposition modeling.
A study conducted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA, 1973) investigated the
particle size distribution (but no standard deviation) fbr aluminum oxide particles from rocket propellants.
Aluminum oxides particles are a combustion product of the materials treatiAit M-136 and M-225 based
on Bang-box testing results. The results of the NASA study indicat^bfiiean mass aluminum oxide
particle size of 12.3 micrometers (pm).
The DOE study (DO
concern generally ra
particles while airborne^
could reduci^ittlfitaHCtive d
of eneroAB^s 1.6 g
In addition, a study conducted by the Department ef^HKy (DOE,
information regarding particle diameter ranges for a varj^^rparticie types:
Oil smoke: 0.03 to 1 (im
Fly ash: 1 to 200 )am
Metallurgical dusts: 0.001 to 100 pm
Carbon black: 0.01 to 0.5 ^m
Combustion nuclei: 0.01 to QJ um
pvided the following
particle density of most combustion products of
'g/cm''. In^j^tton, natural coagulation (contact of two or more
psfele that contains substantial void space, which
true density of particulate matter. A typical density
As indi^Sl^ln Section 3.2, "l^plass W3^ materials constitute about 96 percent of the wastes treated
annually at?^||fe^The results o^p ODOBi emissions testing of 1.3 class waste materials determined that
the most aburK^^pietal (pal^Elate) in 1.3 emissions is aluminum. Aluminum has a density of 2.7
g/cm^.
Based on this available particle information, ATK is proposing the following assumptions for particulate
deposition modeling with OBODM:
• A density of 2.7 g/cm^ will be assumed for particulates, which is based on ODOBi test results and is
comparable to the DOE study (DOE, 1984).
A mass median particle diameter of 12.3 pm (based on NASA 1973).
090904/P 4-10
Revi
• A particle size standard deviation of 2.0 pm in order to account for a reasonable measure of size
distribution variability.
• OBODM will generate a particle size distribution based on 10 particle size categories. This is the
OBODM model default.
4.5.1 Gas Phase Dry Deposition
OBODM does not calculate the dry deposition of gaseous el'^Hions. '"^^ever, OBODM modeling
results for the gas phase will be used to determine the dr^^B^sition rate of ^^^lase pollutants. This
approach is consistent with HHRAP guidance (US^^K005) and OBODM qf^oce, and is also
considered to be a conservative approach because^^^ir concentr§J^n is non-deplenpK§-9-' ^° mass
has been removed for the treatment plume).
Gas phase dry deposition will be calculat
Gas Phase Dry Deposition (pg/in -yr) = Annu
X Conversion Factor (sec/yr
The deposition velo
value specified in the
Deposition Velocity (m/sec)
protocol in03 meters/second (m/sec). which is the default
200!
Table 4dER07i9S^^BUinmar1KUhe gravitational settling parameters that will be used to evaluate
parttc^gg^phase and gaUSbse di^up.osition in the OBODM.
All receptors us^S^^the '^iV'^P^rsion modeling analysis will be based on a Cartesian grid system.
ATK is proposing to^BnHypes of receptor networks will be used in the analysis: general and discrete.
A general receptor netv^k will extend out to 10 km from each treatment units and will be used for
locating the maximum short term and long-term (annual) receptor locations. The discrete receptor
network will consist of special receptors that will support the human health and ecoioglcal risk
assessments. The general and discrete receptor networks are discussed in Sections 4.6.1 and 4.6.2,
respectively.
090904/P 4-11
Rev1
The Universal Transverse Medcator (UTM) coordinates and terrain elevations for all receptors and
treatment units will be based on United States Geological Service (USGS) Digital Elevation Map (DEM)
grids of 1:24,000 at a resolution of 1 meter.
4.6.1 Discrete Receptor Grid
Discrete receptors are defined as special receptors that exist at or bevgnd the ATK boundary and
represent human and ecological exposure points. These locations incU^Ve facility boundary, nearby
residential dwellings, the closest population center or town, workoriWfcsure at an offsite commercial
businesses, and ecological receptor exposure points.
The following is a list of discrete receptors that will be mSKted each treatmei^||^t in the dispersion
modeling analysis:
The Adam's Ranch, which is the closest domestic d
south-southwest of M-136.
The Holmgren Ranch and Pond, which^^the c
approximately 2 km east^aeSfftMSt of M-2
• Four facility boun^^^receptors ^p are sele^u based on the annual prevailing wind direction
measured over a^^^Hiyear pe^j^m^Z throu^^OOl) at the M-245 meteorological monitoring
station.
-136, is located approximately 3 km
mesti^^»lling to the M-225, is located
an oHte commercial business located between the M-136 and M-225
• ChristensmBjesidence. TMgesidential dwelling is located due north of ATK.
• Blue Creek perenrBftspiam, which runs along the western boundary of M-136.
The Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge located about 10.5 km south-southwest of M-225
The Salt Creek Waterfowl Management Area located 13 km east of ATK; and
The Thiokol Ranch Pond, which is located approximately 14 km southwest of M-225.
0g09O4/P 4-12
The Howell Dairy Farm just north ofthe ATK northern property boundary.
All discrete receptors listed above are shown in Figure 4-1.
Rev1
4.6.2 Generai Receptor Grid
ATK is proposing to use a general receptor grid extending out 10 km fr
general receptor grid will include receptors spaced at 100-meter interv
3 km and receptors spaced at 500-meter intervals beyond 3 km ou^^^km
general grid extends far enough out from the treatment units ti
term and long-term receptor locations associated with each^ntment unit,
distance between the M-136 and M-225 treatment units^ilnhite general grid s
each treatment unit. The proposed general grid neJjtfSHES for the M-136 and M-22
shown in Figures 4-2 through 4-5, respectively.
The general grid extending from the M-1
At the request of UDSHW, these receptd
workers. The on-site receptors extend fro
facility boundary in all directiq
4.7 METEOR
The meteorological data
direction,
meteor.oigg^^l para
sev^BiSSfferent sources i
an on-sR4BBeasurement pro:
should be S^M^d based on
data to charadnR the tra
representativeness
each treatment unit. The
each treatment unit out to
ATK believes the 10 km
ation of maximum short-
the large separation
are proposed for
ment units are
to 3 km includes on-site receptors.
-site for OB/OD treatment unit
istance (Q-D) arcs out to the
ire^0torical houriy averages of wind speed and wind
fre, and urban or rural mixing height. These
combination of surface and upper air data and are available from
jing tRHmfional Weather Service (NWS), military installations or as part of
The^Blteorological data used in an air dispersion modeling analysis
[ial and climatological representativeness, as well as, the ability of the
and dispersion in the area of concern. Spatial and geographical
Sieved by using on-site meteorological data. As a result, site-specific
measured data is th^W^re preferred as modeling input (U.S. EPA September 2000), provided
appropriate instrumentation and quality assurance procedures are followed and the data is compatible
with the requirements of the dispersion model.
4.7.1 Surface Data
ATK Is proposing to use five-years (1997 through 2001) of on-site meteorological data collected at the
M-245 meteorological monitoring station. ATK operates the on-site monitoring station approximately
0g0904/P 4-13
Revi
1.5 km southwest of the M-225 treatment unit at an elevation of about 5,000 feet above mean sea level
(amsl). The monitoring station is operated in accordance with the U.S. EPA monitoring guidance for the
collection of onsite meteorological data (U S EPA, 2000). Table 4-4 shows the frequency distribution of
16 wind direction sectors for each individual year and the average of all 5 years.
The monitoring station consists of a 10-meter tower that collects the following data at the 10-meter levei:
• Wind speed
• Wind direction
• Standard deviation of the horizontal wind (sigma theta)
• Temperature
• Relative humidity
• Barometric pressure; and
• Solar radiation
The wind speed, wind direction and air
OBODM
The data recovery percentage f^^ll variable
shown in Table 4-5. The QnPBIQ^^Ii*^wri i
data recovery percentlsVror all (^Bal mode
recommended (U.S.*^^^ February 3HP3) in orde
modeling analysis. wMJIae ^^QflfflBMBlffitih^P^^^^'"^ direction, and temperature in 1999, the
amount of iiiiiinflllliliiiLi in eSSSaBKa\ periocTv^flQ^e range of one to six percent or less. As a result,
substitutiHHeoroldSmdata dSB^ot constitute a significant portion of the meteorological database for
the nd^|€ritjcal variables^^
critical parameters for input into
during the five-year period is
fata recovery after validation. The
{riables was greater than 90 percent, which is
.use on-site meteorological data in a regulatory
The monitdn^lan for the M-Wk station Includes quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures
to ensure thatffQUtata collectdSheets the standanJs of reliability and accuracy as required by U.S. EPA
(U.S. EPA, FebruafHQp^BRe QA/QC procedures implemented by ATK at this station include semi-
annual audits and caliuliei is of instruments, periodic site inspections, data validation, and preventive
maintenance. Meteorological data collected at this on-site station has been approved by the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) for use in prior modeling analyses to evaluate the air
quality impact of ATK OB and OD treatment operations.
The meteorological data collected at the M-245 station is recommended to be appropriate for use in this
modeling analysis for the following reasons:
ogogo4/p 4-14
Revi
1. Data recovery statistics for the 1997 to 2001 on-site meteorological database exceed U.S. EPA
minimum requirements for on-site data recovery.
2. Each annual period of data has been validated by an independent consultant.
3. ATK is located in a remote area of northern Utah. As a result, the potential for finding local sources of
hourly, climatological data that depict local climatology and satisfy tl^^quirements of OBODM is
extremely low. The nearest available source of validated houriy s^He observation data (including
sky condition) is located at Hill Air Force Base (AFB) in Hill, 'M^fcu is located approximately 30
miles southeast of ATK. The M-245 meteorological monitomRtation^ncated 5 miles and 1 mile,
respectively, from M-136 and M-225 treatment units anjjgp'been approvee^yjDEQ for use in prior
ATK modeling analyses.
4. The M-245 monitoring station is located on a hillto^^^^hwe^ABf^225. This stationTas been sited
in accordance with Prevention of Significant Deterioratt^g|»7 monitoring guidance (USEPA, 1967)
and is considered representative of tfH^^stream wind n^jfiat transports emissions from the M-
136 and M-225 treatment units. This ^Rion^wtaajepresemne of the diurnal variations in wind
patterns that are characteristic of mountaiYblley n iff^MitlL " r'THftl rnilrri States (AMS 2002).
ers me«
needed ir
cover
In addition to the meteo
opaque cloud cover
Into OBODM. Hourly
NWS reporti
class re
cove
perlo
height
meteorologicE?
at the M-245 monitoring station, houriy values of
er to preprocess the meteorological data for input
ceiling height are only available from 1** class
ited by the NWS or the military. The closest 1"
at Hill AFB. Hill AFB houriy observation data for opaque cloud
m the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) for the same 5-year
TK i^fffiposing to merge houriy observations of cloud cover and ceiling
station hourly data to develop the required surface data for input a
program (PCRAMMET - see Section 4.7.3).
As indicated in Table^WHKre are varying percentages of missing data the M-245 five-year database.
The meteorological preprocessor program that will be used to prepare input files for OBODM requires a
complete dataset for an entire year. In other words, missing data values must be filled in with substitute
data. The substitute data is normally obtained fi'om a nearby location that has similar climatological
characteristics.
ATK is proposing to follow the guidance recommended by USEPA (USEPA, 2000) for the substitution of
missing data. Missing 1-hour periods of surface data will be substituted by interpolation of the previous
090904/P 4-15
Revi
and following hour's values. For periods greater than 1-hour, data will be substituted from the nearest,
representative houriy reporting station, which is Hill AFB. In addition to reporting houriy cloud cover and
ceiling height, this station also reports houriy values of wind speed, wind direction and temperature. Due
to its same geographical location and similar topography setting. Hill AFB has been selected as a source
of representative substitute data for missing data.
In addition to being the closest 1** reporting station to ATK, Hill AFB ancyJSK have climatological and
topographical similarities that support of the selection of Hill AFB as a sgaKFoi substitute data:
• Hill AFB is located at the base of a valley similar to ATK.
The alignment of the complex terrain and valley
south.
Hill AFB is bounded by higher terrain
terrain (Spring Hills).
monitoring locationM^rimarily north to
The ATK site is bounded by higher
4.7.
Upper
available
calculate houriy
obtained National
stations in the western
Both ATK and Hill AFB are located be
infiuence from the GreabH^ganeJs ex
of the Great Salt Lake. Any
ocations.
The amount of nii^Cg data from JP M-245 staWftJn each annual period was in the range of one to
six percent. As a re5R[Substilj|iaM|atefled. wiiWatirection and temperature data from Hill AFB will
not constttiiB^aLqnific^ffiMPn of misbii'i!IVy)n^ologlcal database for the most critical variables.
Upper Air ObMhationSBJtoclna Height Datal
ing height data, is required to run OBODM. Twice daily mixing heights
stations are used by the meteorological preprocessor program to
ixing height for input into OBODM. Upper air sounding data is usually
ervice upper air reporting stations. The number of upper air reporting
States is very limited due to operational requirements and budgetary
constraints, which play a key role in the determining where and how many stations are operated. As a
result, this condition limits the availability of upper air reporting stations near to a source.
The closest NWS upper station to ATK is located in Salt Lake City, which is about 80 miles south of ATK.
The next closest NWS upper air reporting station is located in Lander, Wyoming, which is about 190 miles
northeast of ATK. Although considerable site-to-site variability is expected for measurements taken close
to the surface compared to upper air measurements, ATK believes the upper air sounding measurements
090904/P 4-16
Revi
from Salt Lake City are generally representative of a much larger spatial domain, which includes the
northern Utah valley.
It is important to note that the PCRAMMET preprocessor program uses the Holzworth Method (USEPA
1996) to calculate twice-daily mixing heights. Wilh this method, the morning mixing height is calculated
using the morning minimum surface temperature, which occurs between 0200 and 0600 hours. The
afternoon mixing height is calculated using the maximum temperature obsei^U from 1200 to 1600 hours.
As a result, the surface temperature is an important factor in the mixin^ApSt computation routine. ATK
will use a combination of upper air data from Satt Lake City and s^HA^mperature observations from
Hill AFB to produce twice-daily mixing heights.
It is assumed that Hill AFB is a more suitable choice f
Lake City for several reasons. Hill AFB is geog
located beyond the urban heat flux influence of S
reporting station is located only 10 miles from the
climate. Depending on the time of the yvRfeftitemperature'
temperatures and affect the lakeA^alley wi^^y^B^Qdgen
Great Salt Lake and is expected to be lesslmtcted^
cloud cover and ceiling hei^^B^pfations frdBHiiU^IPB wil
stability class in the metQfiBe^cal pnnapcessor.
4.7.3 Meteorolof
surface temperatu]ffi^kcompared to Salt
much ctQ&er to ATK ani^^^umed to be
ddition, the NWS^alt Lake City
, which is known to infiuence local
Great Salt Lake can moderate local
located about 25 miles from the
addition, the use of opaque
consistency in the calculation of
and The surfa
into Ofiffi^M using P
July'inft and August 19
OBODM*
height data fijeslbr each annual period will be preprocessed for input
IETT^i£PA. 1995b) as recommended in the HHRAP guidance (USEPA,
The'W^t of the PCRAMMET output file is compatible for use with
The input requiri)IH|ats for B^^MMET include houriy surface observations of year, month day, hour,
ceiling height, wind^m|mpind direction, dry bulb temperature, and opaque cloud cover in CD144
format. The resulting o^ut file from PCRAMMET contains hourly values of wind speed, wind direction,
ambient temperature, stability category, rural mixing height, and urban mixing height. The rural mixing
heights will be used in this modeling analysis.
As stated in Section 4,7.1, data recovery for the M-245 five-year database is greater than 90 percent to
100 pen::ent for aH input variabtes, wfth tfie exception of chad cGiling height and opaque cloud cover,
which is not collected at M-245. Substitute houriy cloud ceiling height and opaque cloud cover, for the
090904/P 4-17
Revi
con-esponding annual periods, will be obtained from Odgen AFB and inserted into the houriy onsite data
files to develop a complete input file for PCRAMMET.
In the case of missing surface observations at the M-245 station, current USEPA data substitution
guidance (on-site gukjance reference) using Interpolation will be followed in the case of one-hour gaps,
in the case of lengthy (greater than 1 hour missing) missing data periods, surface observations from the
Hill Air Force base will be used as substitute data. The Hill AFB surface datA.considered to be the most
representative site for providing substitute data based on its location rekd^^o ATK, climatology, location
relative to higher surrounding terrain, and similar land use. In thejBH|^missing mixing height data,
missing data will be substituted in accordance with USEPA guidaiBWuSEHra|£92).
4.8 COMPARISON TO AiR QUALITY STAND
As described in Section 4.9, OBODM modeling res
1.3, and Category E emission factors presented in Sectio
sources at M-136 and M-225. The^aMkprocessing
concentrations and deposition rates at ^ki^Hhuim onsite
NO EXPOSURE
receptors for 1-hour, 3-hour, 8-hour, 2A-rf&K, an^
concentrations will then be cojBfimad to all app^tble
concentrations, and UtahJBtHi^creiNq Levels
cessed in conjuHWon with 11,
ine the impact of emissions from all
will determine the maximum air
pffsite receptors and all discrete
avera'gn^ periods. The calculated air
^rd&, occupational exposure criteria
[, and served input for the HHRA.
The comparison to appttfej^ie standi
available from the Utah
Box ElderJSSmUd^dditio
closes^^SWfi air qualitV^nltorin
also conB&r the impact from background sources if data is
). ATK no longer collects PM10 air quality in
,Q does not corfSDct air quality monitoring in Box Elder County. The
ion (AQS# 49-003-0003) to the ATK facility is located in Brigham
City.^Jl^^lder County, U^^The ^U|g[t^ City monitoring station is part of the USEPA's ambient air
quality rmmpring program, wnh is car^d out by State and local agencies and consists of three major
categories of^mtoring statiorj^tate and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS). Currently, this station
only monitors P^wnd oza^Parameters. ATK has requested UDAQ to provide background air quality
data for criteria pollGSjfanBox Elder County to complete the analysis for compliance with NAAQS. If
provided by UDAQ, bacRground values will be added to OBODM modeling results from ATK treatment
operation to determine compliance with NAAQS.
The applicable air quality standards/exposure criteria will include the criteria pollutants (National Ambient
Air Quality Standards [NAAQS]) and Utah Toxic Screening Levels (TSLs). The State of Utah has
adopted the NAAQS. In the case of on-site air concentrations, 2008 Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) time-weighted-average (TWA) exposure concentration values will be used to
090904/P 4-18
Revi
evaluate ATK worker exposure at each treatment unit. These TWA values are based on an 8-hour
exposure period.
4.9 POST-PROCESSING ACTIVITIES
The output from OBODM output files will require post-processing in order to calculate receptor
concentrations for all target analytes identified in Section 3 for 1.1, 1.3, and^ategory E waste materials.
The post-process activities are described in the table below.
Step Post-Processing A
Review OBODM results for all mete
determine the maximum 1-houi^AErnnual air
factors and dry deposition fa«|^^ssociated with
treatment source at the rij^MJm onsite/ofgite receptors
all discrete receptors.
Calculate short-term (1-, 8-, a
and long-term^^i^l) air concerr
onsite/offslte r
Step 1 using the«issi
proposed in Sectio
eraging periods
s for the maximum
discrete rS^^tors identified in
for l.fj^^^nd Category E
our^i^^ual air dispersion
utant specific emission rate
nd concentrations to the air
determine compliance with
}-hour air concentrations and determine compliance
OSHA criteria for onsite treatment unit worker
>ure to'^il^ment emissions.
gas phase and deposition input files for HHRA.
ogogo4/p 4-19
TABLE 4-1
M-136 SOURCE PARAMETERS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
*-ATK will CO
materials.
TABLE 4-2
M-225 SOURCE PARAMETERS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
rmine representative heat content values for 1.1 and
TABLE 4-3
SUMMARY OF DEPOSITION MODELING PARAMETERS
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
Parameter
Emission Surrogate
Emission Factor
Non-gravitational dry deposition
Gravitational settling
Mean particle diameter
Particle size standard deviation
Number of particle size classes
Cloud depletion
OBODM Output
Gas Phase OBODM Run
CO2
1.0
Yes (computed in post-
processing step)
No A
^W
-JA JBP^
^Mr Air concentrffllTdig/m^ ^
Particulate Phase OBODM Run
Aluminum (density of 2.7 g/cm^)
1.0
^ ""^
HT Yes
^9^ 12.3 pm
^^ 2.0
^ftk 10 ^It ^ DepositioPfHJfcdag/m^)
TABLE 4-4
5-YEAR WIND ROSE SUMMARY FOR THE
M-245 METEOROLOGICAL MONiTORING STATION
ATK PROMONTORY, UTAH
DIRECTION
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
w
WNW
NW
NNW
N
TOTAL
Direction Frequency/Wind Speed Group
1997
0.08
0.07
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.10
0.07
0.11
0.11
0.10
1998
0.08
0.10
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.05
OJI
1999
0.10
0.09
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.06
2000
0.09
0.12
0.05^
004di
CM^
^<k0™
0.04 ,4|tp^-06
^Wr °'^^ 0.02
0.01^
0.0^|L QtffiF
0.08 ^WK
. 0.06
^^^T^^^ 0.1%J^H|^
'^Hh^
^bk
0.1 im^ n inpiiii) pn '
Ik, vm. ^^F
^6ffib^%pt1.00 II^BTO
"^^^ife^
i.o9^
1 m/sec)
2001
QfcJO
^jflh
iSKos &P-05
^M[B4
^B^ o.osW
0.02
0.01
^ 0.03
0.06
0.11
0.07
0.07
V 0.08
^0.10
1.00
5-Year
Average
0.09
0.10
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
1^0.05
^^04
^»ji
0^9^
0.05
0.10
0.07
0.08
0.10
0.11
1.0
RECOVBrni^BlCENTAGES* FOR
VARIABLES iBoNITORED AT THE M-245
OLOGICAL MONiTORING STATION
K PROMONTORY, UTAH
1999
91
91
91
2000
99
99
99
2001
98
94
94
* - After validatidri:
..- i\-^—^
f"iT^"?^'r^
"N
s:^
/i^ •'• ;
\ir/r
^WFWU^~77JWP'^—T7.„^.f c-.-^e-' --^^'^^;4W^'--^M- ^-^'^^
-j'^' v^
• );.-f: -^,—^;- -f* j ,.^4^
-..t
-«t -<- .
y^-^ Vt. !
WwwglWrrl^
•"
^*.
"•^\ \.
T-
--t IVN^V^"*-'/^'}
_4-i: ',";T •—-*--*-:»K-—.-.L. -.^..— i -^-»-y^
*T
N
.!>
te-^^
^ A— -.;.r' t^^^^^^--»i» r
r.v'J'
\p^.. ...^.-j—::^._^ 1—LL ._..
1 n
; i' . "• •
-J -' •"' . . -
-r {376670, 46^9479) .. ... g^Q^^-K-.-. |3fl06ML . ^^ ..-.^^
.y^
.^3846691 3866691 \388669\ 13906691
fA
146174001
146^54801
4; ^ 46134a0\
V • ..-^.
L^-n::"-;. ••"•
..^'.••^XWdjI
|4gff4fl01
r:., , J
'Ir^-r-
\ •:
^.'.-'L'lV'^^'
-fc=r
6f
y^^v--
?« /* •46094801
u \4607480\.
'V^i . \\
46O54S0\
\ '-I ^^
^^4-4:
46074801
;,'-' • i/ >1^
1
-. • ^ -
..;
""""•^..^ ••'+*'
Thioliol Ittnch Ponrfi
•-'
•^'
8hwl
•^h-rr
,v
.3—t;
^,(^l««S*5t*!l,
^ *y*T
r7
—-WT •• 41 "1 ill —I I t liW'.L •! .1.
.j«—..*«••-^. -•™ j-"-' - -J .•
^ 5*^
'^
-•4-^
•*•%;-^1
••_»« -:i--^
-; •->»..
•?
,K-
*<
"<:i •r, *»*k\ I
>*Pi
. *».. - v--:---J*i
iu-ix
•^
-f;
,,,•-", • I • lir tt
K3.
K
n-'>"
y '' I '1^-^.-4 -
--H
V,
/
1 ; : *..-..-^'.--^ y
I'';
.^^-4-
.^^~v-4-- •
OlU^--w'{396669. 46794601^.
V - -
-4^-^
r^-^-"T-^^TLT"^
'•r^'-
.| •-:-•!».. _;>^ J* ••• •
ZM *-';'.].- -^>>l..^'h _•<.
^Tt^ J.'*l l.l^.
/• \if '^
y; Holmgnn Ranch
,-t;.,.
N..
-^ ;K
rafcrSMrlWyBfttf WaftBiai
it :,
d-'•.iuf~''' '•
•-'" ^•" '• V- -S.! I i
J ].* 'ig \ ijT I .' ii'i'f. I |.||'>'i •-
;>f> V
'':y?ir:~rjia:.^r.<. -.J./*•
J'
J.^,„_^-- ^
|46f5480f
46f34d0l
'^V;.vi
i4gtf480i . 1
^—:»+
148094801
JL fjf
-r%*ti
•^m
C-
:.•--•
,L_Z_V
\'376670,4S9a479\ [38266^1 i394'669j ! \386669\ ; 3686691 •| 1390669
- TI
0«*T"«I IIID liri'C
*->
LEGEND
• Discrete Receptor
•^ Treatment Unit
Facility Boundary *\
\M\-2
V^i JJ-tW "- '.,7-.<
imik.
•om cusinum
L fc B s T <i K Y
DHAWN BT DATE
K.MOORE laoyw
CHECKED BY DATE
J. LUCAS oinwia
REVISED BY DATE
SCALE
AS NOTED
^ H I n I.
»*< '^f^-
.>,i-
i
.<t*^'-X
/ ..•
.^
394669
IV
" !
• •'
2000
'^^^\.^^
zooo
P: IGI SVTHIOKOHAPWTHOKOLARJ M138rtie75THFATMENT UMTS LAYOUT 01«W10 JEE
j Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.
LOCyVTION OF ATK PROMONTORY M-136 AND M-225 TREATMENT UNITS
AND DISCRETE MODELING RECEPTORS
PROMONTORY, UTAH
CONTHACrNO.
013BB
0WNB1N0.
APPROVED BY DAIH
•RAWING NO.
FIGURE 4-1
BEV,
0
DRAWN BY
J.LAMEY
CHECKED BY
J. LUCAS
CHECKED BY
K. MOORE
COST/SCHEDULE-AREA
SCALE
AS NOTED
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc
M-136 TREATMENT UNIT
3 KILOMETER GENERAL RECEPTOR GRID
100 METER INCREMENT
ATK
PROMONTORY, UTAH
OWNER NO.
APPRON^D BY DATE
APPROVED BY DATE
DRAWING NO.
FIGURE 4 - 2
REV.
0
1^
??•'-•:
370e72,4<^56^ •^'^72872\ 374872\
m •
• •
462166^
^46196661
4617666]
ri4675666| ,.
^•-L. V-
/ I
JK^
\» V'/ >[Af
46136661
4611666\
y\'-
-" '"'Tf "fliirMfnri'"
./n
.-^
\ V
'« •
')^'',#-^H^
i/tf.—•- •^•' i
'*'~'--^. ^'7
— •f. -:: .^mrilL
• >k. •y
•-a ' m •
•4-*
._ ..„ _ *.. _j*»
I • ^'-^^
r' \
K -•
i?'-.
.f •
:"f«..
—k—•••'^•"1 -•
i?>f-ii
#"•-
r--'VV" "•
w.
-liv-rLV-
•.;? T-*-;ii
^s
••'. i^
-^•^•" *:•• -^•'"•r.S" •-'•^v--' t^-'^-v
. • "•."•^' • . !-L-t.^-*'"T"^»> r 4?5
'll' • • • Ills •' •
V
^v -
46096661 ., ( , , • ,
4607666] I, |i--:4/.'.>„r-,i •>>,;? •,;... ,u. V',>i-ii.U
/
h'lP-V^^' ^'^
^•^ •V---... ,i:—
13765721 378872
.1
^*
/..
W
>ir-«r
tr-» '
ir^l V • \.
* t)
:.^ A l_^^\ •
•£:•*-**•'•• ,
••-i.-a-.
.' /.'
-/• ... ); '.. ^ ' I...
•1,
'«ir •• -T •
t»«^
"t
^-i^rj
M>
3808721 3828721
^.^v^-:.
^5*;;;^;/^='';—t-r[;;'-7-
I •, •
•^
.*_ 1
s
:^f ^. ...C \.:A'-..X.r9LJ,.^
X •r
^.4».'^'^ 't
!.. , _^,.# - -
• # • M .• ' • 1 •
•,- -:4' ' ''^' •" • •tl
-'•/.--^ I.
^fvT^
' >>_.,"• •
ni"#,
.i-je ViViP^
"^rsw.:?? ^*--
UJ*:-, J
••{ "^« /
:;*n-^:J<'i^f ••••
*is«5«£r--
:M-^
"•^:;^.
¥•/ i
>-
'• f
lU-JLJ • *•» ¥17" at »r»^
Jl^
/
\ I*
:iN.^^
iM-136
XH^.
,, »-•
^^-f' • '';>^ir'^^?
> "* ~TBSitet5 llll,"*™
V-'V-
"' 1 ••^'•'• •//'•' 1 '•••• • ,^ t " '^- M •'•••• ••"•'•'
! \384872\ \' ; f386872|i * .4 |388872| ", -^ ,.
• »4—^« ^^J • •- •'\e'.i'i» ,#," ii|i». ,.'.•. •iiu>i..'.I- !»• . L..i"-| tf"—r
,-v
:'.-%
..-t.,.r
' -^ '^K: ,.!-.
••-*:.•"
••-M v;);
390872, 46256661
^^
'•••;.!
'^ r ; •• '••—^
~y.
'•'.^r^n - iPf
• •.- * H
" a" f I .• • '^i\"'':f'.] m m
^1 «
•--..IP. .
• I
s'WvJ'*
^S'^'^'^VV'Hi'r^
^h (i^Sl^i^.^
-MK\t •^v^'i^
<•<
^^
*r')
• '" •
J'* '^ -1
I'P • pi/',-••'./[»•
._ "nnum
-* " O
{uw]
y^^
\:^....\.^ C^ f ^1- L-» •
'•-<...
^%^-
• ^>-?=»
•*•,
• •
•^-
• .•
^
..'^iil .. •/..-i-y^. ( I.
/•-f *^ j_ >
4623666\
\
4621666]
i^-^t
46f9666|'^--
' •" > /'- .^^ 1
46^7666
46^56661 j
•tiii#w ^•i^y^iij
i
-i:-_
1^ '
370872, 460566^
-.'. \.f(i(*
LEGEND
^ Treatment Unit
^^/ Facility Boundary
374872] 376872 378872] 380872] 3828721
H**t( ^^4/—"-^»?--.^^ '!i.
/ i
-U-r.- -'..', f^ -rJ (;-*
3 Kilometers
P:\GlfflTHI0K0L\APmTHI0KOLAPR 1*136: 10 KM GRJD REPORT LAYOUT 01/11/10 JEE
I t
DRAWN BY
J. UVMEY
DATE
07/17/02
CHECKED BY
J.LUCAS
DATE
01/11/10
REVISED BY
J. ENGLISH
DATE
01/11/10
COST/SCHEDULE-AREA
I I
SCALE
AS NOTED
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.
M-136 TREATMENT UNIT
3 KM TO 10 KM GENEF^L RECEPTOR GRID
500 METER INCREMENT
ATK
PROMONTORY, UTAH
i, - - "^'U..- - (^ ^vtv-w
CONTRACT NO.
01389
OWNER NO-
APPROVED BY DATE
APPROVED BY DATE
DRAWING NO-
FIGURE 4 - 3
CHECKED BY
J.LUCAS
REVISED BY
J- ENGUSH
DATE
01/11/10
COST/SCHED ULE-AREA
SCALE
AS NOTED
ffl
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc
M-225 TREATMENT UNIT
3 KILOMETER GENERAL RECEPTOR GRID
100 METER INCREMENT
ATK
PROMONTORY. UTAH
OWNER NO.
APPROVED BY DATE
APPROVED BY OATE
DRAWING NO.
FIGURE4-4
REV.
0
• miLU un^^^^^—
PARTMtlNT C^^• THG IMTFHIOP
OEOlOaiCAL SURVEY
.- ..?rriL_ , _. 2_
LAMPO JUniCnON OtIADRAN
a„?^fiL4.-^-«"t^ -n~ ^ r
UTJIM-BO* ELOUt CO. K
»,-...—,-..>..™ .,«.^, •• \^«C7--^-s.-'
.L:^..;--J-.
/
. ' .-' 'i ji/"
^-l^-u.?f^' f
376670. 4619479] ... .... |378669|^^ 380669
J
4617480]
[46094Sd\
4615480\
4613480]
4611480]
'v^ • ^^•'W'^'^''
.•^i^-7^.^
i.-i \ ^ ^
•"'IA' ••..''v •*KII
i6|L^- . « J^^L
' IV ^-*»,—• • '9//'*
'\\
384669] U-386669]
*"•*•; --•.i^ I
• 1*. * 1 II • *^« < ia I 11;.-. • •
^^ - -•-.•* ^ \ •" \ "'-••
II • •ft,* ••-I'll • • -. "v "\ •• •
I 4 • 1»—1-' •'•s 1 I • • f-9 3 , »4 t. •»
46074801
-h/^/ • :: • • •
\W _ i_ _ • _ i "_
y, >
4605480
46034801
.•-^„..
.' t*
^ "-.'
'- n
'*•- -•
JL_ • * I •
4» •
• u»
- ;«•-
.SE
•ytf-f"i. •«
'• •.!.>« M •
'rrW-^nvA
—.-til-...
••• '•
^^^*
-•^v^^-
l--«.\>''
/•i
•.._,^. "i^W
•
•"ri'
-.y^^i
1. -to-
.>«
^x-^
^-v-
r^^-y-^.£ ..„-;^^-,
-h-
-?^^
.JirO^,....
•-if'
V"::
_V„_ IB- '•••!
y /H:X..L. ' „m ->,. ,1
• «
'_ ll
388669l^___j^:: ..|390669| ' yr^'^\J:, \392669]/_ ,.}__ |394669L^ l^.^ • H396669. 4619480]^i
> #
•^ : ^i ' • ^
t
^'
-t
-.1" ^•.,.
-<^U
-r-' \'
WM I I / j ^.. ,^. V - ll-
t ^.
*---"..'•>>*•"-"— ^.<^/
.J
^ <>
• ^ •''.C^i r - " -' .•• -'i''
-. }U
'•--*• "Ht--
'"*•
.--*1 i--''^^Tr:
'/^^
-^"P^-J - .^1
>j I
i' 4615480 f \
1_*__'LJL.J :i-^
•M "
-r-M- 'T ^. V-"-» . • -. •
'>.-,•.-•.,--.:•!?»•. •»
J • T C R I • K
T I a u « L _
4617480] \
46114801
M -
.«.
4609480
•' \J ILr: s " ^ %
^
0 1376670^ 4599479], [378669 380669 382669
ItlNI-. ' 1 •
LEGEND
-^ M-225 Treatment Unit
^^/ Facility Boundary
KtOBATOKT B s r 0 0 •
3 0 3 Kilometers
P\GiS\TH(OKOUAPR\THI0KOLJW>R 1*225: 10KM GRID REPORT LAYOUT 01/11/10 JEE
...*••• i • wo —f LA T
3846691
I -1 A I I Oft MUD
" I i( ri
,^#"t5C-.. ^'Jt^^^ ^ '•''""•"
\ >•
DRAWN BY
J.LAMEY
DATE
07/16/02
CHECKED BY
J. LLX;AS
DATE
01/11/10
CHECKED BY
J. ENGLISH
DATE
01/11/10
COST/SCHEOULE-AREA
SCALE
AS NOTED
lb
Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.
M-225 TREATMENT UNIT
3 KM TO 10 KM GENERAL RECEPTOR GRID
500 METER INCREMENT
ATK
PROMONTORY, UTAH
COfJTRACT NO.
01389
OWNER NO.
APPROVED BY DATE
APPROVED BY DATE
DRAWING NO-
FIGURE4-5