DAQ-2024-008626

1

DAQC-638-24
Site ID 11060 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – INTERSTATE ROCK PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED –
Hurricane Pit – Washington County

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist

DATE: June 26, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Drum Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse
Location: 600 North 3400 West, Hurricane, UT 84737
Contact: Colt Stratton: 435-635-2628
Tester: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Permit/AO #: DAQE-AN110600004-23 dated May 22, 2023
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated June 26, 2024

On June 26, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for the testing of the Drum
Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse at Interstate Rock Products Hurricane Pit in Washington County, Utah.
Testing will be July 23, 2024, to determine compliance with emission limits found in Condition 11.B.4.f
of Approval Order DAQE-AN110600004-23 and 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart I.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK
3. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK
4. RM 5 used to determine particulate emissions: OK
5. RM 9 Used to determine visible emission opacity: OK
6. RM 202 used to determine condensable particulate matter: OK

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The pretest protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the methods proposed in the pretest protocol be
considered as acceptable to determine compliance with the emission
limits of Condition 11.B.4.f in Approval Order DAQE-AN110600004-23
and 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart I.

ATTACHMENTS: Interstate Rock Products Pretest Protocol.

Site Specific Test Plan

Interstate Rock Products
42 South 850 West
Hurricane, UT 84737

Source to be Tested: Drum Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse
Proposed Test Date: July 23, 2024

Project No. AST-2024-1796

Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3614 East Southern Ave., Suite 1
Phoenix, AZ 85040

Site Specific Test Plan
Test Program Summary

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page i

Regulatory Information

Permit No. DAQE-AN110600003-23
Regulatory Citation 40 CFR 60, Subpart I

Source Information

Source Name Target Parameters
Drum Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse Outlet PM, VEE

Contact Information

Test Location Test Company Analytical Laboratory
Interstate Rock Products
42 South 850 West
Hurricane, UT 84737

Facility Contacts
Beau Stratton
[e-mail]

Colt Stratton
[e-mail]
[phone]
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3614 East Southern Ave., Suite 1
Phoenix, AZ 85040

Project Manager
Adam Robinson
[e-mail]
[phone]

Field Team Leader
James Carter
[e-mail]
[phone]
(subject to change)

QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
[phone]

Test Plan/Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]

Alliance Technical Group, LLC
5530 Marshall Street
Arvada, CO 80002
Eric Grosjean
[e-mail]
[phone]

Site Specific Test Plan
Table of Contents

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Facility Description ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Safety Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 1-1
2.0 Summary of Test Program .......................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 General Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded ........................................................... 2-1
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule............................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.4 Emission Limits ........................................................................................................................................... 2-2
2.5 Test Report .................................................................................................................................................. 2-2
3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 3-1
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ........ 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content ............................................................................ 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and 202 – Total Particulate Matter ................................................... 3-1
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 9 – Visible Emissions Evaluations ....................................................... 3-2
4.0 Quality Assurance Program ......................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1 Equipment ................................................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 Field Sampling ............................................................................................................................................ 4-2
4.3 Analytical Laboratory.................................................................................................................................. 4-2
LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule ........................................................................................ 2-2
Table 2-2: Emission Limits ...................................................................................................................................... 2-2
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Method 1 Data
Appendix B Example Field Data Sheets

Site Specific Test Plan
Introduction

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page 1-1

1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Interstate Rock Products (Interstate) to conduct
compliance testing at the Hurricane, Utah facility. Portions of the facility are subject to provisions of DAQE-
AN110600003-23 and 40 CFR 60, Subpart I. Testing will be conducted to determine the emission rate of particulate
matter (PM) at the exhaust of the Drum Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse. Visible emissions evaluations (VEE) will also
be conducted to determine the opacity of the Drum Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse exhaust.

This site-specific test plan (SSTP) has been prepared to address the notification and testing requirements of DAQE-
AN110600003-23 and 40 CFR 60, Subpart I.
1.1 Facility Description
Interstate’s Hurricane facility is located at 42 South 850 West in Hurricane, Utah, where it manufactures asphaltic
concrete for paving applications. Facility operations include an active aggregate mine, crushing and screening plant,
and a hot mix asphalt plant with a drum mixer, conveyors, screens, augers, weigh hoppers, silos, and cold aggregate
bins. Engines provide electrical power to the plant.

The permit limits production of asphaltic concrete to 150,000 tons per any 12 consecutive-month period, of which
no more than 37,500 may be reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). The Approval Order also limits the fuel that can be
used in the hot mix asphalt plant to natural gas.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel planned to be involved in this project are identified in the following table.

Table 1-1: Project Team

Interstate Personnel Beau Stratton
Colt Stratton
Regulatory Agency UDAQ
Alliance Personnel James Carter
other field personnel assigned at time of testing event
1.3 Safety Requirements
Testing personnel will undergo site-specific safety training for all applicable areas upon arrival at the site. Alliance
personnel will have current OSHA or MSHA safety training and be equipped with hard hats, safety glasses with side
shields, steel-toed safety shoes, hearing protection, fire resistant clothing, and fall protection (including shock
corded lanyards and full-body harnesses). Alliance personnel will conduct themselves in a manner consistent with
Client and Alliance’s safety policies.

A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) will be completed daily by the Alliance Field Team Leader.

Site Specific Test Plan
Summary of Test Programs

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page 2-1

2.0 Summary of Test Program
To satisfy the requirements of the DAQE-AN110600003-23 and 40 CFR 60, Subpart I, the facility will conduct a
performance test program to determine the compliance status of the Drum Mix Asphalt Plant Baghouse.
2.1 General Description
All testing will be performed in accordance with specifications stipulated in U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1, 2,
4, 5/202, and 9. Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program. The
following is a summary of the test objectives.

• Testing will be performed to demonstrate compliance with the UDAQ permit and 40 CFR 60, Subpart I.
• Emissions testing will be conducted on the outlet of the Drum Mix Asphalt Plant.
• Performance testing will be conducted at the maximum normal operation load for the source.
• Each of the three (3) test runs will be approximately 60 minutes in duration.
• Total particulate matter is the summation of the filterable and condensable fractions and will be considered
to be equal to PM10/PM2.5. A minimum of 0.90 dscm (31.8 dscf) will be collected during each Method
5/202 test run per 40 CFR 60, Subpart I.
• The molecular weight will be assumed to be 30.0 lb/lb-mole for volumetric flow rate calculations.
2.2 Process/Control System Parameters to be Monitored and Recorded
Plant personnel will collect operational and parametric data at least once every 15 minutes during the testing. The
following list identifies the measurements, observations and records that will be collected during the testing
program:

• asphalt material composition
• asphalt production rate (tph)
• RAP content (%)
• total pressure drop
• drum or mix temperature
• baghouse temperature
• damper position (% open)
2.3 Proposed Test Schedule
Table 2-1 presents an outline and tentative schedule for the emissions testing program.

Site Specific Test Plan
Summary of Test Programs

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page 2-2

Table 2-1: Program Outline and Tentative Test Schedule

Testing Location Parameter US EPA Method No. of Runs Run Duration Est. Onsite
Time
DAY 1 – July 22, 2024
Equipment Setup & Pretest QA/QC Checks 4 hr
DAY 2 – July 23, 2024
Drum Mix Asphalt
Plant Baghouse
VFR 1-2
3 60 8 hr BWS 4
PM 5 / 202
VEE 9
DAY 3 – July 24, 2024
Contingency Day (if needed)
2.4 Emission Limits
Emission limits for each pollutant are below.

Table 2-2: Emission Limits

Source Pollutant Citation
Drum Mix Asphalt Plant
Baghouse
PM – 5.8 lb/hr; 0.030 grain/dscf
Permit PM10 – 4.64 lb/hr; 0.024 grain/dscf
PM2.5 – 4.64 lb/hr; 0.024 grain/dscf
VEE – 10%
2.5 Test Report
The final test report must be submitted within 30 days of the completion of the performance test and will include the
following information.
• Introduction – Brief discussion of project scope of work and activities.
• Results and Discussion – A summary of test results and process/control system operational data with
comparison to regulatory requirements or vendor guarantees along with a description of process conditions
and/or testing deviations that may have affected the testing results.
• Methodology – A description of the sampling and analytical methodologies.
• Sample Calculations – Example calculations for each target parameter.
• Field Data – Copies of actual handwritten or electronic field data sheets.
• Laboratory Data – Copies of laboratory report(s) and chain of custody(s).
• Quality Control Data – Copies of all instrument calibration data and/or calibration gas certificates.
• Process Operating/Control System Data – Process operating and control system data (as provided by
Interstate) to support the test results.

Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page 3-1

3.0 Testing Methodology
This section provides a description of the sampling and analytical procedures for each test method that will be
employed during the test program. All equipment, procedures and quality assurance measures necessary for the
completion of the test program meet or exceed the specifications of each relevant test method. The emission testing
program will be conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology

Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate 1 & 2 Full Velocity Traverses
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Particulate Matter 5 / 202 Isokinetic Sampling
Visible Emissions 9 Certified Observer

All stack diameters, depths, widths, upstream and downstream disturbance distances and nipple lengths will be
measured on site with an EPA Method 1 verification measurement provided by the Field Team Leader. These
measurements will be included in the test report.
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 – Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points will be selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 1. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances will be equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure 1-1 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
1.

Full velocity traverses will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system will consist of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature will be measured with a K-
type thermocouple and pyrometer.

The molecular weight will be assumed to be 30.0 lb/lb-mole for volumetric flow rate calculations.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 – Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train will consist of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger will be filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger will be analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run
on the same analytical balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 5 and 202 – Total Particulate Matter
The total particulate matter (filterable and condensable PM) testing will be conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Methods 5 and 202. The complete sampling system will consist of a glass nozzle, glass-lined probe,
pre-weighed quartz filter, coil condenser, un-weighed Teflon filter, gas conditioning train, pump and calibrated dry
gas meter. The gas conditioning train will consist of a coiled condenser and four (4) chilled impingers. The first
and second impingers will be initially empty, the third will contain 100 mL of de-ionized water and the last impinger

Site Specific Test Plan
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page 3-2

will contain 200-300 grams of silica gel. The un-weighed 90 mm Teflon filter will be placed between the second
and third impingers. The probe liner heating system will be maintained at a temperature of 248 ±25°F, and the
impinger temperature will be maintained at 68°F or less throughout testing. The temperature of the Teflon filter will
be maintained greater than 65°F but less than or equal to 85°F.

Following the completion of each test run, the sampling train will be leak checked at a vacuum pressure greater than
or equal to the highest vacuum pressure observed during the run. If condensate is collected in the first dry impinger,
then the front-half of the sample train (the nozzle, probe, and heated pre-weighed filter) will be removed in order to
purge the back-half of the sample train (coil condenser, first and second impingers and CPM filter). A glass bubbler
will be inserted into the first impinger. If needed, de-ionized ultra-filtered (DIUF) water will be added to the first
impinger to raise the water level above the bubbler, then the coil condenser will be replaced. Zero nitrogen will
connected to the condenser, and a 60-minute purge at 14 liters per minute will be conducted. After the completion
of the nitrogen purge the impinger contents will be measured for moisture gain. The nitrogen purge will be omitted
if minimal condensate is collected in the dry impingers.

The pre-weighed quartz filter will be carefully removed and placed in container 1. The probe, nozzle and front half
of the filter holder will be rinsed three (3) times with acetone to remove any adhering particulate matter and these
rinses will be recovered in container 2. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels marked for transport
to the identified laboratory for filterable particulate matter analysis.

The contents of impingers 1 and 2 will be recovered in container CPM Cont. #1. The back half of the filterable PM
filter holder, the coil condenser, impingers 1 and 2 and all connecting glassware will be rinsed with DIUF water and
then rinsed with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinses will be added to container CPM Cont. #1 while the
solvent rinses will be recovered in container CPM Cont. #2. The Teflon filter will be removed from the filter holder
and placed in container CPM Cont. #3. The front half of the condensable PM filter holder will be rinsed with DIUF
water and then with acetone, followed by hexane. The water rinse will be added to container CPM Cont. #1 while
the solvent rinses will be added to container CPM Cont. #2. All containers will be sealed, labeled and liquid levels
marked for transport to the identified laboratory for condensable particulate matter analysis.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 9 – Visible Emissions Evaluations
The stack gas opacity will be determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test 9. Visible emission
evaluations will be conducted by a certified visible emissions evaluator. Opacity readings will be recorded in 15-
second intervals during each of three (3) 60-minute evaluations.

Site Specific Test Plan
Quality Assurance Program

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page 4-1

4.0 Quality Assurance Program
Alliance follows the procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Management Plan to ensure the
continuous production of useful and valid data throughout the course of this test program. The QC checks and
procedures described in this section represent an integral part of the overall sampling and analytical scheme.
Adherence to prescribed procedures is quite often the most applicable QC check.
4.1 Equipment
Field test equipment is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. Prior to mobilizing for the test
program, equipment is inspected before being packed to detect equipment problems prior to arriving on site. This
minimizes lost time on the job site due to equipment failure. Occasional equipment failure in the field is
unavoidable despite the most rigorous inspection and maintenance procedures. Therefore, replacements for critical
equipment or components are brought to the job site. Equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is
returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned and
recalibrated where necessary.

Calibrations are conducted in a manner, and at a frequency, which meets or exceeds U.S. EPA specifications. The
calibration procedures outlined in the U.S. EPA Methods, and those recommended within the Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA-600/R-94/038c, September 1994) are utilized.
When these methods are inapplicable, methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other nationally recognized agency may be used. Data obtained during calibrations is checked
for completeness and accuracy. Copies of calibration forms are included in the report.

The following sections elaborate on the calibration procedures followed by Alliance for these items of equipment.

• Dry Gas Meter and Orifice. A full meter calibration using critical orifices as the calibration standard is
conducted at least semi-annually, more frequently if required. The meter calibration procedure determines
the meter correction factor (Y) and the meter’s orifice pressure differential (ΔH@). Alliance uses approved
Alternative Method 009 as a post-test calibration check to ensure that the correction factor has not changed
more than 5% since the last full meter calibration. This check is performed after each test series.
• Pitot Tubes and Manometers. Type-S pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria required by U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.84 unless a specific coefficient has been
determined from a wind tunnel calibration. If a specific coefficient from a wind tunnel calibration has been
obtained that coefficient will be used in lieu of 0.84. Standard pitot tubes that meet the geometric criteria
required by U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 are assigned a coefficient of 0.99. Any pitot tubes not
meeting the appropriate geometric criteria are discarded and replaced. Manometers are verified to be level
and zeroed prior to each test run and do not require further calibration.
• Temperature Measuring Devices. All thermocouple sensors mounted in Dry Gas Meter Consoles are
calibrated semi-annually with a NIST-traceable thermocouple calibrator (temperature simulator) and
verified during field use using a second NIST-traceable meter. NIST-traceable thermocouple calibrators
are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory.
• Nozzles. Nozzles are measured three (3) times prior to initiating sampling with a caliper. The maximum
difference between any two (2) dimensions is 0.004 in.
• Digital Calipers. Calipers are calibrated annually by Alliance by using gage blocks that are calibrated
annually by an outside laboratory.

Site Specific Test Plan
Quality Assurance Program

AST-2024-1796 Interstate – Hurricane, UT Page 4-2

• Barometer. The barometric pressure is obtained from a nationally recognized agency or a calibrated
barometer. Calibrated barometers are checked prior to each field trip against a mercury barometer. The
barometer is acceptable if the values agree within ± 2 percent absolute. Barometers not meeting this
requirement are adjusted or taken out of service.
• Balances and Weights. Balances are calibrated annually by an outside laboratory. A functional check is
conducted on the balance each day it is use in the field using a calibration weight. Weights are re-certified
every two (2) years by an outside laboratory or internally. If conducted internally, they are weighed on a
NIST traceable balance. If the weight does not meet the expected criteria, they are replaced.
• Other Equipment. A mass flow controller calibration is conducted on each Environics system annually
following the procedures in the Manufacturer’s Operation manual. A methane/ethane penetration factor
check is conducted on the total hydrocarbon analyzers equipped with non-methane cutters every six (6)
months following the procedures in 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ. Other equipment such as probes, umbilical
lines, cold boxes, etc. are routinely maintained and inspected to ensure that they are in good working order.
They are repaired or replaced as needed.
4.2 Field Sampling
Field sampling will be done in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the applicable test
method(s). General QC measures for the test program include:
• Cleaned glassware and sample train components will be sealed until assembly.
• Sample trains will be leak checked before and after each test run.
• Appropriate probe, filter and impinger temperatures will be maintained.
• The sampling port will be sealed to prevent air from leaking from the port.
• Dry gas meter, ΔP, ΔH, temperature and pump vacuum data will be recorded during each sample point.
• An isokinetic sampling rate of 90-110% will be maintained, as applicable.
• All raw data will be maintained in organized manner.
• All raw data will be reviewed on a daily basis for completeness and acceptability.
4.3 Analytical Laboratory
Analytical laboratory selection for sample analyses is based on the capabilities, certifications and accreditations that
the laboratory possesses. An approved analytical laboratory subcontractor list is maintained with a copy of the
certificate and analyte list as evidence of compliance. Alliance assumes responsibility to the client for the
subcontractor’s work. Alliance maintains a verifiable copy of the results with chain of custody documentation.

Appendix A

Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
--
--
--in
--in
--in
--in
--ft2
--in
--
--
--ft
--(must be ≥ 0.5)
--ft
--(must be ≥ 2)
0
--
Measurer (Initial and Date):--
Reviewer (Initial and Date):--
23456789101112
1 25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 5.6 5.0 4.5 4.2 1 -- -- --
2 75.0 50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8 16.7 15.0 13.6 12.5 2 -- -- --
3 -- 83.3 62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3 27.8 25.0 31.8 20.8 3 -- -- --
4 -- -- 87.5 70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 35.0 22.7 29.2 4 -- -- --
5 -- -- -- 90.0 75.0 64.3 56.3 50.0 45.0 40.9 37.5 5 -- -- --
6 -- -- -- -- 91.7 78.6 68.8 61.1 55.0 50.0 45.8 6 -- -- --
7 -- -- -- -- -- 92.9 81.3 72.2 65.0 59.1 54.2 7 -- -- --
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.8 83.3 75.0 68.2 62.5 8 -- -- --
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 94.4 85.0 77.3 70.8 9 -- -- --
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 95.0 86.4 79.2 10 -- -- --
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 95.5 87.5 11 -- -- --
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 95.8 12 -- -- --
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = -- ft.
B = -- ft.
Depth of Duct = -- in.
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
Distance
from
outside of
port
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Traverse
Point
% of
Diameter
Distance
from inside
wall
Equivalent Diameter:
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
-- DUCT
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
-- - --
--
--
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation:
Duct Design:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Width of Duct:
Upstream
Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
BA
Appendix B
QA/QC Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
#1 #2 #3 Dn (Average)Difference
-- -- --
Date Probe or
Thermocouple ID
Reference
Temp. (°F)
Indicated
Temp. (°F)Difference Criteria Probe Length
-- -- --
Date
Balance ID:
Certified Weight ID:
Certified Weight Expiration:
Certified Weight (g):
Measured Weight (g):
Weight Difference (g):-- -- -- -- -- --
Flow Rate (lpm): Flow Rate (lpm): Flow Rate (lpm):
Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature Clock Time Temperature
- ----------
- ----------
- ----------
- ----------
- ----------
Acetone (ml) Acetone (ml) Acetone (ml)
--
--
--
Nozzle Diameter (in.)
Date Nozzle ID Criteria
--
Material
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
Pass
≤ 0.004 in.
Date Pitot ID
Evidence of
damage?
Barometer ID
Evidence of
mis-alignment?
Calibration or
Repair required?
Field Balance Check
Posttest Purge
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
± 1.5 % (absolute)
Method 5 Rinse Volumes
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Reagent ByDateField LotField Prep
performedLot#
Date Barometric
Pressure
Evidence of
damage?Reading Verified Calibration or
Repair required?
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location --
Source --
Project No. --
Date
Sample Point Angle (ΔP=0)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average --
Method 4 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Parameter
Analysis
Run 1 Date:--
Impinger No.1234Total
Contents H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g --
Final Mass, g --
Gain -- -- -- -- --
Run 2 Date:--
Impinger No.1234Total
Contents H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g --
Final Mass, g --
Gain -- -- -- -- --
Run 3 Date:--
Impinger No.1234Total
Contents H2O H2O Empty Silica --
Initial Mass, g --
Final Mass, g --
Gain -- -- -- -- --
--
--
--
--
Gravimetric
Isokinetic Field Data
Location: Start Time: Source:
Date: VALID End Time: Project No.:-- --
Moisture:% est.Est. Tm:°F Pb: --in. Hg
Barometric: --in. Hg Est. Ts: --°F Pg: --in. WC
Static Press: --in. WC Est. ΔP: --in. WC O2:--%
Stack Press: --in. Hg Est. Dn: --in.CO2:--%
CO2:--%Target Rate: --scfm Check Pt. Initial Final Corr.
O2:--%LEAK CHECKS Pre Mid 1 Mid 2 Mid 3 Post Mid 1 (cf) --
N2/CO:--%-- --Leak Rate (cfm):-- -- -- Mid 2 (cf) --
Md: --lb/lb-mole -- --Vacuum (in Hg):-- -- -- Mid 3 (cf) --
Ms: --lb/lb-mole Pitot Tube:-- -- -- --
Stack Probe Filter Imp Exit Aux
Amb. Amb. Amb. Amb.
Amb.
Begin End Ideal Actual -
0.00 #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!---
Final DGM:
Max
Vac %ISO BWS
60.0 min 0.000 ft3 -- in. WC -- °F -- °F -- -- in. WC -- --
--
--
Mid-Point Leak Check Vol (cf):--
% ISO
--
Pitot Cp/Type:
ΔH @ (in.WC):
Probe ID:
Nozzle ID:
Nozzle Dn (in.):
Liner Material:
Pitot
Tube
ΔP
(in WC)
Pitot ID:
RE
S
U
L
T
S
--
VmRun Time ΔPTm
--
YqaΔHTs
--
STACK DATA (EST)
--
Run 1
--
--
--
STACK DATA (EST) EQUIPMENT MOIST. DATA
Vlc (ml)
--
K-FACTOR
STACK DATA (FINAL)FILTER NO.
Parameter:--
--
--
Meter Box ID:
Y:
Sa
m
p
l
e

Pt
.
Gas Temperatures (°F)
DGM Average
Amb.
Sample Time
(minutes)
Dry Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Vs
(fps)
Pump
Vac
(in. Hg)
Orifice Press.
ΔH
(in. WC)
Gas Temperatures (°F)
--
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
where,
Pb -- = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH--= pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Pm -- = in. Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
where,
Pb -- = barometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg --= static pressure, in. H2O
Ps -- = in. Hg
Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
where,
Y -- = meter correction factor
Vm 0.000 = meter volume, cf
Pm -- = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Tm --= absolute meter temperature, oR
Vmstd -- = dscf
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
where,
Vlc --= weight of H2O collected, g
Vwstd -- = scf
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionless (theoretical at saturated conditions)
where,
Ts -- = stack temperature, °F
Ps -- = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
BWSsat -- = dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless (measured)
where,
Vwstd -- = standard wet volume, scf
Vmstd -- = standard meter volume, dscf
BWS -- = dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
where,
BWSsat -- = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSmsd -- = moisture fraction (measured)
BWS --
--
--
--
1
--
Pm ൌ Pb ൅ Δ H
13 6
Ps ൌ Pb ൅ Pg
13 6
𝑉𝑚𝑠𝑡𝑑 ൌ 17.636 ൈ Y ൈ Vm ൈ Pm
𝑇𝑚
Vwstd ൌ 0.04716 ൈ Vlc
BWSsat ൌ 10଺.ଷ଻ି ଶ,଼ଶ଻
୘ୱାଷ଺ହ
Ps
BWS ൌ Vwstd
ሺVwstd ൅ Vmstdሻ
BWS ൌ BWSmsd unless BWSsat ൏ BWSmsd
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
--
--
--
1
--
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole
where,
CO2 -- = carbon dioxide concentration, %
O2 -- = oxygen concentration, %
Md -- = lb/lb mol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole
where,
Md -- = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS -- = moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ms -- = lb/lb mol
Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec
where,
Cp -- = pitot tube coefficient
Δ P1/2 --= velocity head of stack gas, (in. H2O)1/2
Ts -- = absolute stack temperature, °R
Ps -- = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ms -- = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
Vs -- = ft/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
where,
Vs -- = stack gas velocity, ft/sec
As --= cross-sectional area of stack, ft2
Qa -- = acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
where,
Qa -- = average stack gas flow at stack conditions, acfm
BWS -- = moisture fraction, dimensionless
Ps -- = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ts -- = absolute stack temperature, °R
Qs -- = dscfm
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), dimensionless
where,
Y -- = meter correction factor, dimensionless
Θ 60 = run time, min.
Vm 0 = total meter volume, dcf
Tm -- = absolute meter temperature, °R
ΔH@ --= orifice meter calibration coefficient, in. H2O
Pb -- = barometric pressure, in. Hg
ΔH avg --= average pressure differential of orifice, in H2O
Md -- = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
(Δ H)1/2 --= average squareroot pressure differential of orifice, (in. H2O)1/2
Yqa -- = percent
Md ൌ ሺ0.44 ൈ % COଶሻ ൅ ሺ0.32 ൈ % O2ሻ ൅ ሺ0.28 ሺ100 െ % COଶ െ % O2ሻሻ
Ms ൌ Md ሺ1 െ BWSሻ ൅ 18.015 ሺBWSሻ
Qa ൌ 60 ൈ Vs ൈ As
Qs ൌ 17.636 ൈ Qa ൈ ሺ1 െ BWSሻ ൈ Ps
Ts
Vs ൌ 85.49 ൈ Cp ൈ ሺΔ P ଵ/ଶሻ avg ൈ Ts
Ps x Ms
Yqa ൌ
Y െ Θ
Vm 0.0319 ൈ Tm ൈ 29
Δ𝐻@ ൈ Pb ൅ Δ Havg.
13.6 ൈ𝑀𝑑
ΔH avg.
𝑌 ൈ 100
Appendix A
Example Calculations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No.:
Parameter:
--
--
--
1
--
Volume of Nozzle (Vn), ft3
where,
Ts -- = absolute stack temperature, °R
Ps -- = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Vlc --= volume of H2O collected, ml
Vm 0.000 = meter volume, cf
Pm -- = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
Y -- = meter correction factor, unitless
Tm --= absolute meter temperature, oR
Vn --= volume of nozzle, ft3
Isokinetic Sampling Rate (I), %
where,
Vn -- = nozzle volume, ft3
θ 60.0 = run time, minutes
An --= area of nozzle, ft2
Vs -- = average velocity, ft/sec
I--= %
Vn ൌ 𝑇𝑠
𝑃𝑠 0.002669 ൈ𝑉𝑙𝑐൅Vm ൈ𝑃𝑚ൈ𝑌
𝑇𝑚
Visible Emissions Evaluations
Project No.
Facility Name
Facility Location min 0 15 30 45 min 0 15 30 45
Date 0 30
Observation No. 1 31
Source of Emissions 2 32
Stack Height ft 333
Distance from Source ft 434
Direction from Source 5 35
636
Time 7 37
Wind Direction (From) 8 38
Wind Speed mph mph 939
Ambient Temperature °F °F 10 40
Sky Conditions 11 41
Color of Background 12 42
Plume Color 13 43
Steam Plume? (y/n) 14 44
Attached to Stack? (y/n) 15 45
16 46
17 47
18 48
19 49
20 50
21 51
22 52
23 53
24 54
25 55
26 56
27 57
The highest six (6) minute rolling average was 0.0 28 58
Rolling Average > 20%0 29 59
Rolling Average > 40%0
Lecture Field
Certification Dates
Certification Agency
End
0
0
Start
Observer's NameAdditional Comments
Observations
Limits:
Observer's Signature