The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDSHW-2006-007002 - 0901a068801658d5 ANNEX A ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS A-1 ANNEX A ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials cm centimeter CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide COPC chemical of potential concern DCD Deseret Chemical Depot DEQ Department of Environmental Quality DNT 2,4-dinitrotoluene DQO data quality objective E&E Ecology & Environment, Inc. ELAB ELAB of Tennessee EMBS Environmental Monitoring Baseline Study EMFS Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study ERIS Environmental Restoration Information System ESE Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. FSP Field Sampling Plan GC/HRMS gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry GC/MS gas chromatography/mass spectrometry GPS Global Positioning System HASP Health and Safety Plan HMX high melting explosive A-2 HPCDD heptachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins HPCDF heptachlorinated dibenzofurans HXCDD hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins HXCDF hexachlorinated dibenzofurans ID identification IRIS Integrated Risk Information System ISC3 Industrial Source Complex, Version 3 km kilometer LC/MS liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry µg/g microgram per gram µg/kg microgram per kilogram µg/L microgram per liter m2 square meter m2/ha square meter per hectare MDL method detection limit mg/kg milligram per kilogram mg/L milligram per liter MLE maximum likelihood estimation mm millimeter ng/kg nanogram per kilogram NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OCDD octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin OCDF octachlorodibenzofuran PCB polychlorinated biphenyl PCDD polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin A-3 PCDF polychlorinated dibenzofuran PECDD pentachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins PECDF pentachlorinated dibenzofurans pg/L picogram per liter PM ECW Program Manager for the Elimination of Chemical Weapons PMCD Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization Pt Prentiss-Wilcoxon QA quality assurance QA/QC quality assurance/quality control QAPjP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC quality control RDX cyclonite RL reporting limit ROS robust regression on order statistics RPD relative percent difference SOP Standing Operating Procedure SOW Statement of Work SQL sample quantification limit SVOC semivolatile organic compound SWLOK Southwest Laboratories of Oklahoma, Inc. TCCC Tooele County Chamber of Commerce TCDD tetrachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins TCDF tetrachlorinated dibenzofurans TNT 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene TOCDF Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility UBWR Utah Board of Water Resources UGS Utah Geological Survey A-4 USACHPPM U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine USAEC U.S. Army Environmental Center USBLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency USGS U.S. Geological Survey UTL upper tolerance limit UTM Universal Transverse Mercator VOC volatile organic compound VX nerve agent, O-ethyl S-(2-diisopropylaminoethyl) methylphosphonothioate WRS Wilcoxon Rank-Sum WSR Wilcoxon Signed-Rank ANNEX B REFERENCES B-1 ANNEX B REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), American Society for Testing and Materials Methods Manual, 1993. Dames & Moore, Final Agricultural Impact Assessment Plan for the Environmental Baseline Study, Tooele Chemical Demilitarization Facility (TOCDF), Tooele, Utah, 1997b. Dames & Moore, Final Sampling and Analysis Plan, Environmental Monitoring Baseline Study for the Tooele Chemical Demilitarization Facility (TOCDF), Tooele, Utah, 1996. Dames & Moore, Final Technical Report, Environmental Monitoring Baseline Study, Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele, Utah. Prepared for Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, Contract No. DACA31-94-D-0060, Delivery Order No. 2, 31 July 1997a. Deseret Chemical Depot, Draft Interim Ecological Sampling Plan for Rainbow Reservoir, Tooele, Utah. Deseret Chemical Depot, Environmental/Safety Division, AMSSB-ODC-RM, 1999. Helsel, D., Less than Obvious: Statistical Treatment of Data Below the Detection Limit, Environmental Science and Technology, 24(12): 1767—1774, 1990. Hitchcock, A. S., Manual of the Grasses of the United States, Misc. Pub. No. 200, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1950. HydroGeoLogic, Inc., Draft Baseline Monitoring Data Assessment Report for the Tooele Chemical Demilitarization Facility, Tooele, Utah. Prepared for U.S. Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, October 2001. B-2 HydroGeoLogic, Inc., Draft Final Technical Report, Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study, Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, May 1999, Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele, Utah. Prepared for U.S. Army Chemical and Biological Defense Command and Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, September 2002. HydroGeoLogic, Inc., Final Sampling and Analysis Plan and Health and Safety Plan, Environmental Monitoring Baseline Study for the Tooele Chemical Demilitarization Facility (TOCDF), Tooele, Utah, 1998. Jacobs Engineering Group, Working Draft Technical Report Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study, Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele, Utah, May 2002. MacMahon, J., Deserts, The Audubon Society Nature Series, The Chanticleer Press Edition, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1990. Margelef, D. R., “Information Theory in Ecology,” General Systematics, Vol. 3, pp. 36-71, 1958. Olig, S. et al., Mapping and Quaternary Fault Scarp Analysis of the Mercur and West Eagle Hill Faults, Wasatch Front, Utah, unpublished technical report submitted to the U.S. Geologic Survey NEHRP Award No. 1434-HQ-97-GR-03154, 1999. Olig, S. et al., Paleoseismology of the Mercur fault and segmentation of the Oquirrh-East Great Salt Lake fault zone, Utah, unpublished technical report submitted to the U.S. Geologic Survey NEHRP Award No. 98HQGR1036, 2001. Parker, K. G., Some Important Utah Range Plants, Circular No. 383, Cooperative Extension Service, Utah State University, 1979. B-3 Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization (PMCD), 2002 Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Tooele, Utah, February 2003. Simpson, E. H., “Measurement of Diversity,” Nature, Vol. 163, p. 688, 1949. Stubbendieck, J. S., S. L. Hatch, and C. H. Butterfield, North American Range Plants, University of Nebraska Press, 1992. Tooele County Chamber of Commerce (TCCC), Demographics, Tooele County Chamber of Commerce, 2005. http://www.tooelechamber.com/18.phtml U.S. Army Chemical Materials Agency, 2005 Data Validation Letter Report for Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study for the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Tooele, Utah, November 2005. U.S. Army Chemical Materials Agency, Field Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study at Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Tooele, Utah, Final, October 2003. U.S. Bureau of Land Management (USBLM), written Communication, Teresa Rigby, United States Bureau of Land Management, 2004. U.S. Census Bureau (USCB), U.S. Census Bureau Report, 2000. http://www.co.tooele.ut.us/TooeleX.htm U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review, EPA-540/R-94-013, February 1994. B-4 USEPA, EPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, EPA-540/R-99-008, October 1999. USEPA, Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for use in Fish Advisories, Volume I, Fish Sampling and Analysis, Third Edition, EPA 823-B-00-007, November 2000. USEPA, Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models (Revised), United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-454/B-95-003a, 19 July 1995. USEPA, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA 600/4-79-20, 1979. USEPA, Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Interim Final, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540-1-89-002, December 1989. USEPA, Statistical Analysis of Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities, Addendum to Interim Final Guidance, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, Waste Management Division, EPA/530-R-93-003, July 1992. USEPA, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, Third Edition, 1997. USEPA, USEPA Analytical Operations/Data Quality Center National Functional Guidelines for Chlorinated Dioxin/Furan Data Review, EPA 540-R-02-003, August 2002. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), GPS Measurements, Fault Modeling and Integrated Earthquake Hazard Assessment of the Wasatch Front, Utah, United States Geological Survey, Progress Report for Period - October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002, USGS Award Number 02HQGR0098, 2002. B-5 USGS, Preliminary Materials Mapping in the Oquirrh Mountains Region for the Utah EPA Project Using AVIRIS Data, Robert R. McDougal, Roger N. Clark, K. Eric Livo, Raymond F. Kokaly, Barnaby W. Rockwell, and J. Sam Vance, 1999. JPL Publication 99-17, Summaries of the 8th Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, R. O. Green, Ed., NASA JPL AVIRIS Workshop, conducted Feb 8-11, 1999, pp 291-298, 1999. Utah Board of Water Resources (UBWR), Utah State Water Plan West Desert Basin, Utah Board of Water Resources, 1594 West North Temple, Suite 310, PO Box 146201, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-6201, May 2001. Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), Draft Final Phase I Ecological Risk Assessment; Deseret Chemical Depot Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (TOCDF), Utah Department of Environmental Quality, EPA I.D. No. UT5210090002, 5 September 2002a. http://www.eq.state.ut.us/EQSHW/CDS/PVA_Documents/CDS_ECOProtocal_DRAFT.h tm UDEQ, TOCDF RCRA Hazardous Waste Permit; Attachment 1 – Facility Description, United States Department of the Army, Deseret Chemical Depot, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, State/EPA I.D. Number: UT5210090002, 2002b. http://www.eq.state.ut.us/EQSHW/CDS/CDS_TOCDF_PERM.htm#Table%20of%20Con tents Utah Geological Survey (UGS), Fault Line Forum Volume 15, Number 2, 1999, Utah Geological Survey, Utah Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 146100, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1999a. http://www.ugs.state.ut.us/ghp/flf/flf152.pdf B-6 UGS, Geology and Geologic Hazards of Tooele Valley and the West Desert Hazardous Industry Area, Tooele County, Utah, Special Study 96, November 1999, Bill D. Black, Barry J. Solomon, and Kimm M. Harty, Utah Geological Survey, Utah Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 146100, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1999b. http://www.ugs.state.ut.us/whatsnew/news/archives/New0100.htm UGS, Utah Geological Survey Geologic Hazards Program, Utah Geological Survey, Utah Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 146100, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2002. http://geology.utah.gov/ghp/index.htm Vallentine, J. F., Important Utah Range Grasses, Circular No. 281, Cooperative Extension Service, Utah State University, not dated. Western Regional Climate Center-Desert Research Institute (WRCC), Historical Climate Information; Average Statewide Precipitation For Western U.S. States, Western Regional Climate Center, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, Nevada 89512, 2005. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?uttooe Whitson, T. D., ed., Weeds of the West, Western Society of Weed Science, 1992. ANNEX C FIELD DATA AND LABORATORY RESULTS C-1 ANNEX C FIELD DATA AND LABORATORY RESULTS This annex contains field data for vegetation characterization and data tables containing laboratory analyses of soil, shrub, and herbaceous samples. Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soil Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results –Vegetation (Shrubs) Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization C-2 (This page intentionally left blank.) C-3 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila C-4 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-5 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-6 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-7 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-8 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-9 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-10 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-11 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-12 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-13 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-14 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-15 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-16 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-17 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-18 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-19 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-20 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-21 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-22 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-23 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-24 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-25 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-26 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-27 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-28 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-29 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-30 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-31 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-32 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-33 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-34 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-35 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-36 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-37 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) C-38 Table C-1. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Surface Soila (Continued) Notes: a Data quality is described in the 2005 Data Validation Letter Report for Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study for the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Tooele, Utah, (CMA, November 2005) including use of the data qualification codes which are briefly explained below: U = analyte was analyzed for but was not detected (ND) above the reported sample quantitation limit. J = analyte was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value is an estimate of the concentration of the analyte in the sample. UJ = analyte was ND above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is an estimate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample. In this table, method detection limits are presented for ND samples for consistency with Environmental Monitoring Baseline Study. C-39 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs)a C-40 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs)a (Continued) C-41 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs)a (Continued) C-42 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-43 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-44 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-45 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-46 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-47 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-48 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-49 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-50 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-51 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-52 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-53 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-54 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-55 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-56 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-57 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-58 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-59 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-60 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-61 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-62 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-63 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-64 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-65 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-66 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-67 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) C-68 Table C-2. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Shrubs) (Continued) Notes: a Data quality is described in the 2005 Data Validation Letter Report for Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study for the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Tooele, Utah, (CMA, November 2005) including use of the data qualification codes which are briefly explained below: U = analyte was analyzed for but was not detected (ND) above the reported sample quantitation limit. J = analyte was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value is an estimate of the concentration of the analyte in the sample. UJ = analyte was ND above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is an estimate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample. In this table, method detection limits are presented for ND samples for consistency with Environmental Monitoring Baseline Study. C-69 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous)a C-70 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-71 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-72 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-73 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-74 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-75 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-76 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-77 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-78 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-79 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-80 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-81 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-82 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-83 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-84 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-85 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-86 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-87 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-88 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-89 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-90 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-91 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-92 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-93 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-94 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-95 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-96 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-97 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) C-98 Table C-3. 2005 EMFS Analytical Results – Vegetation (Herbaceous) (Continued) Notes: a Data quality is described in the 2005 Data Validation Letter Report for Environmental Monitoring Follow-on Study for the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Tooele, Utah, (CMA, November 2005) including use of the data qualification codes which are briefly explained below: U = analyte was analyzed for but was not detected (ND) above the reported sample quantitation limit. J = analyte was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value is an estimate of the concentration of the analyte in the sample. UJ = analyte was ND above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is an estimate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample. In this table, method detection limits are presented for ND samples for consistency with Environmental Monitoring Baseline Study. C-99 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization C-100 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-101 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-102 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-103 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-104 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-105 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-106 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-107 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-108 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-109 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-110 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-111 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-112 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-113 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-114 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-115 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-116 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-117 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-118 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-119 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-120 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-121 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-122 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-123 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-124 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-125 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-126 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-127 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-128 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-129 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-130 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-131 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-132 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-133 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-134 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-135 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-136 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-137 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-138 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-139 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-140 Table C-4. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Shrub Characterization (Continued) C-141 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization C-142 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-143 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-144 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-145 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-146 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-147 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-148 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-149 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-150 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-151 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-152 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-153 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-154 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-155 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-156 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-157 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-158 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-159 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-160 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-161 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-162 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-163 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-164 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-165 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-166 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-167 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-168 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-169 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-170 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-171 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-172 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-173 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-174 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-175 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-176 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-177 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-178 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-179 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-180 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-181 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued) C-182 Table C-5. 2005 EMFS Field Data for Herbaceous Vegetation Characterization (Continued)