DSHW-2018-005565 - 0901a0688084eb70

Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
A‘.WASATCH
ENVIRONMENTAL
JUN 1 8 2018
-r-A0-2ole-c05565
Mr. Brad Lauchnor
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
June 14, 2018
Project No.: 2273-002A
RE: Work Plan for Relocation of Municipal Landfill Waste (Final)
Canyon Creek Commercial Center
Spanish Fork, Utah
Mr. Lauchnor,
On behalf of our client, Spanish Fork City, Wasatch Environmental, Inc., is submitting the attached final
work plan for the relocation of municipal landfill waste to accommodate the Canyon Creek Commercial
Center development in Spanish Fork, Utah. We have incorporated your requested edit and are seeking
your approval to proceed with the proposed work.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions, comments, or concerns you may have regarding
Canyon Creek Commercial Center project.
Best regards,
Michael Cronin, P.G.
Senior Geologist/Senior Project Manager
2410 WEST CALIFORNIA AVENUE •SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84104
PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]
Website• www wasatch-environmentatcom • e-Mail. wei@wasatch-environmental com
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
WORK PLAN
FOR RELOCATION OF MUNICIPAL LANDFILL WASTE
CANYON CREEK COMMERCIAL CENTER
SPANISH FORK, UTAH Div of Waste Management (FINAL) and Radiation Control
JUN_ 8 2918
—V—JH14)-200-00.5%5
Project No. 2273-002A
Prepared for:
Mr. Jered Johnson
Engineering Division Manager
40 South Main Street
Spanish Fork City, Utah 84660
and
Mr. Brad M. Lauchnor
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Prepared by:
Wasatch Environmental, Inc.
2410 West California Avenue
Salt Lake C.IM UT 84104 ... . ..... ...• 00.361044?..
I 44 f a. IM1CHAELS:rO : 0 CRONIN : . 5546361
Michael S. Cronin, P.G.
June 14, 2018
2410 WEST CALIFORNIA AVENUE
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84104 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone] e-mail. wei@wasatch-ent4ronmentatcom www.wasatch-environmentatcom
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Pacie No.
1. INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Site Description and Location 1

1.2 Site Environmental Issues 1
2. OBJECTIVE 3
3. METHODS 3

3.1 Public Notification and Involvement 3

3.2 Control of Site Access 3

3.3 Environmental Oversight 3

3.4 Excavation Dewatering 4

3.5 Relocation of Landfill Waste 4

3.6 Restoration of Landfill Cap 5
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 5
5. HEALTH AND SAFETY 5
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE 5
7. PROJECT DELIVERABLES 6
8. REFERENCES 6
FIGURES
Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — General Site Layout
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Public Notice Map
Appendix B — Water Treatment System Information
Appendix C — Municipal Waste Removal and Relocation Plan (Plan Sheet 601)
Wasatch Environmental, Mc. Table of Contents
Page i
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
WORK PLAN
FOR RELOCATION OF MUNICIPAL LANDFILL WASTE
CANYON CREEK COMMERCIAL CENTER
SPANISH FORK, UTAH
1. INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Spanish Fork City, the owner of the Spanish Fork and Springville municipal waste landfills
where the waste relocation will occur (Site), Wasatch Environmental, Inc., (Wasatch) has prepared this
Work Plan to document the methods and procedures that will be employed for the relocation of the
municipal landfill waste.
1.1 Site Description and Location
The Site is located along the east side of 1100 East, between 1130 North and the Spanish Fork Parkway,
in the northeastern portion of Spanish Fork, Utah (as shown on Figure 1). The Site occupies the western
portions of the Spanish Fork and Springville municipal waste landfills. There are no other developed uses
of the Site. The Site is located approximately 2,000 feet from the nearest residential development, and
approximately 1,000 feet from the nearest commercial development.
1.2 Site Environmental Issues
Both the Spanish Fork and Springville municipal waste landfills were closed prior to implementation of the
current solid waste regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which
require permitting and increased regulatory oversight of solid waste landfills. Both the Spanish Fork and
Springville municipal waste landfills were unregulated and unlined landfills and are believed to have
received only municipal solid waste. The primary environmental concerns stemming from the use of the
Site as municipal solid waste landfills are:
1. Accumulation of, and potential exposure to, landfill gases (i.e., methane and hydrogen sulfide,
etc.);
2. Potential groundwater contamination resulting from landfill leachate mixing with groundwater;
3. Potential residual soil contamination resulting from landfill leachate contacting the soil beneath
the landfill; and
4. The possibility that potentially hazardous industrial waste may have been buried within the
landfills.
The Site also resides within the area of the Expressway Lane Plume Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) site (UT0009134958). The Expressway Lane
Plume was the subject of an Innovative Assessment conducted by the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ), Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR), in 1999 (DEQ/DERR,
1999). The results of the Innovative Assessment indicated that there were no detections of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), pesticides, or polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) in groundwater; but that several total metals (arsenic, lead, and chromium) were
detected in groundwater at concentration above their respective United States Environmental Protection
Agency (U.S. EPA) Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). The results of the Innovative Assessment
also indicated that the landfills in the area did not appear to be the source of the groundwater
contamination. In the conclusion of the Innovative Assessment report, the DERR postulated that the
observed metals concentrations in groundwater either represent "natural levels for shallow groundwater in
this area or indicate a separate upgradient source." The Expressway Lane Plume was the subject of a
Preliminary Assessment conducted by the DERR, in 2005 (DEQ/DERR, 2005). In the conclusion of the
Preliminary Assessment, the DERR rejected the concept of the metals concentrations in groundwater
originating from a source located upgradient of the landfills and suggest that the landfills were the source.
However, the DERR also acknowledged that they lacked the analytical data to verify this assertion, that
the metals concentrations were "only moderately elevated," and that the U.S. EPA had "judged the
potential risks at this site to be minimal by issuing a 'No Further Remedial Action Planned' designation."
Wasatch Environmental, inc. Page 1
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
Several more recent subsurface investigations have been conducted which are relevant to the Site, the
results of which are summarized below.
In September 2013, Cardno ATC conducted a limited Phase II subsurface investigation on the property
located immediately west of the Site, and which will be part of the Canyon Creek Commercial Center
development project (Cardno ATC, 2013). Cardon ATC advanced seven soil borings. Three of the soil
borings were completed as monitoring wells and four borings were completed as temporary piezometers.
Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and Priority Pollutant List metals. The analytical
results indicated that no VOCs were detected at concentration above the U.S. EPA Residential Regional
Screening Levels (RSLs) in soil or above the MCLs in groundwater. Arsenic in soil exceeded both the
Residential and Industrial RSLs in two soil samples. The laboratory reporting limits for arsenic exceeded
both the Residential and Industrial RSLs, so conclusions cannot be reached for the remaining samples
that were reported as non-detections. Soils in Utah commonly exhibit elevated background arsenic
concentrations (commonly as high as 30 to 50 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]). The detected arsenic
concentrations and the laboratory reporting limits were below the typical background arsenic
concentrations. Arsenic in groundwater exceeded the MCL in one sample. The laboratory reporting
limits for arsenic exceeded the MCL, so conclusions cannot be reached for the remaining samples that
were reported as non-detections. Groundwater in Utah commonly exhibits elevated background arsenic
concentrations that exceed the MCL.
In February 2018, Wasatch conducted a subsurface investigation at the Site (Wasatch Environmental,
2018). Wasatch advanced seven soil borings, sampling three of the soil borings (EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3)
for soil (immediately beneath the waste where waste occurred), groundwater (within the waste where
waste occurred), and soil gas (within the waste where waste occurred). The remaining four borings were
advanced only for the purpose of logging the thickness of the waste. Soil borings EB-1 and EB-2 were
located within areas of the Site where waste was buried. Boring EB-3 was located immediately south of
the area of the Site where waste was buried. Soil samples were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
8 metals. Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and RCRA 8 metals. Soil gas samples were
analyzed for VOCs. No VOCs were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding either the Residential or
Industrial U.S. EPA RSLs. No SVOCs were detected in soil. Arsenic was detected in all three soil
samples at concentrations exceeding both the Residential and Industrial U.S. EPA RSLs. No other
RCRA 8 metals were detected at concentrations exceeding either the Residential or Industrial U.S. EPA
RSLs. No VOCs were detected in groundwater at concentrations exceeding the MCLs. Arsenic was
detected in two groundwater samples at concentrations exceeding the MCL. No other RCRA 8 metals
were detected at concentrations exceeding the MCLs. Soil gas samples collected from within the waste
(boring EB-1 and EB-2) exhibited analyte concentrations for several VOCs that exceeded the U.S. EPA
Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) calculator spreadsheet Commercial Target Sub-slab and Exterior
Soil Gas Concentrations. The soil gas sample collected from boring EB-1 also exhibited a methane
concentration significantly above the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL). The soil gas sample collected from
boring EB-3 (located outside of the waste) did not exceed the U.S. EPA VISL calculator spreadsheet
Commercial Target Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Concentrations for any of the VOCs, and the methane
concentration was two orders of magnitude below the LEL.
In March 2018, ATC performed a soil gas survey on the property located immediately west of the Site,
and which will be part of the Canyon Creek Commercial Center development project (ATC, 2018). ATC
collected soil gas samples from 10 locations distributed throughout the property. The soil gas samples
were analyzed for VOCs and methane. None of the soil gas samples exceeded the U.S. EPA VISL
calculator spreadsheet Commercial Target Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Concentrations for any of the
VOCs. Methane was not detected in and of the soil gas samples.
The results of these recent investigations demonstrate that the primary environmental issue related to the
Site is that of elevated arsenic concentrations in soil and groundwater, which is consistent with the
findings previously documented for Expressway Lane Plume CERCLA site. The results of these recent
investigations also appear to demonstrate that VOC concentrations in soil gas (including methane)
decline significantly outside the footprint of the landfills.
Wasatch Environmental, Mc. Page 2
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
2. OBJECTIVE
The objective of this work is to relocate the municipal landfill waste underlying the Site and restore the
Site to conditions suitable for commercial land use. Therefore, regulatory screening levels will be the
U.S. EPA Industrial RSLs for soil, MCLs for groundwater, and VISL Commercial Target Sub-slab and
Exterior Soil Gas Concentrations for sub-slab and exterior soil gas. The anticipated regulatory closure
status is "corrective action complete with controls." Any engineering controls or land use controls that
may be required to manage residual exposure risks will be addressed in a Site Management Plan and an
Environmental Covenant to be authored after completion of the waste relocation work.
3. METHODS
3.1 Public Notification and Involvement
Public notification and public involvement will be managed by Spanish Fork City's Public Information
Officer, Scott Aylett. Public notification will be performed by distributing an email notice to the
surrounding businesses and residences based on the utility accounts. The email notification will describe
the location of the Site, the work that is being performed, the schedule, and provide contact information.
A map showing the geographic area for which public notification emails will be sent is presented in
Appendix A.
3.2 Control of Site Access
The Site is located in a relatively remote and undeveloped portion of Spanish Fork and; therefore, is not
expected to represent an attractive nuisance. Access to the Site will be controlled by erecting orange,
plastic, construction fencing around the perimeter of the Site and by erecting road closure barricades on
1100 East at the north and south ends of the Site. As 1100 East has been vacated, the road closure
barricades would be erected only as a precaution. The approximate location of the fencing and road
closure barricades are shown on Figure 2.
3.3 Environmental Oversight
A qualified environmental professional will be on-site at all times during execution of the relocation of the
landfill waste. The environmental professional will serve in several capacities during the execution of the
waste relocation.
The environmental professional will be responsible for observing the waste as it is being removed and
identifying any waste that may be considered industrial waste (i.e., drums or significant accumulations of
items that may be industrial waste, etc.). Any waste that is identified by the environmental professional
as being potentially industrial waste will be placed on Visqueen® in a staging area located adjacent to the
excavation (as shown on Figure 2), until the waste can be properly characterized, and a determination
can be made regarding proper handling, transport, and disposal methods. Any waste that is determined
to be industrial waste or hazardous waste will be properly managed, transported, and disposed off-site.
The environmental professional will also serve as the Site Health and Safety Officer during the waste
relocation. In the capacity as Site Health and Safety Officer, the environmental professional will be
responsible for ensuring that workers comply with the Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) and
are using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). In this capacity, the environmental
professional will also be responsible for monitoring landfill gas concentrations in the work area, and
notifying workers to upgrade PPE, or temporarily stop work under specific conditions that will be specified
in the HASP. Wasatch anticipates that the environmental professional will monitor landfill gas
concentrations using a RAE Systems MultiRae IR (or similar instrument) capable of monitoring the lower
explosive limit (LEL) calibrated to methane; as well as the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Wasatch further anticipates that heavy equipment operators who
are working in the landfill excavation be equipped with RAE Systems QRAE 3 4-Gas Monitors (or similar
Wasatch Environmental, Inc. Page 3
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
instrument) capable of monitoring LEL; as well as the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, oxygen, and
carbon monoxide. The environmental professional will be responsible for ensuring that all environmental
field instrumentation is fully charged, properly calibrated, and functional prior to commencement of work
each day.
The environmental professional will also be responsible for collecting the water treatment system effluent
samples as required under the conditions of the Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES)
permit as discussed in Section 3.4 of this Work Plan.
Wasatch does not anticipate the need for collecting additional environmental samples of the soil
underlying the landfill waste, groundwater in the landfill excavation, or soil gas; as the issues related to
these environmental media are well understood and discussed in Section 1.2 of this Work Plan.
However, if conditions arise that indicate a need for the collection of additional environmental samples, it
will be the responsibility of the environmental professional to properly collect, preserve, and document the
collection of environmental samples.
Field conditions, observations, and instrument readings will be documented by the environmental
professional in a field notebook and/or field forms. Execution of the waste relocation work will also be
documented photographically.
The environmental professional will communicate any relevant information or concerns to the
environmental project manager and/or excavation superintendent as appropriate. The environmental
project manager and excavation superintendent will be responsible for communicating directly with
Spanish Fork City (Client) and the regulatory agencies.

3.4 Excavation Dewatering
The landfill waste extends to a depth below the water table; therefore, the excavation will need to be
dewatered to facilitate the relocation of the landfill waste. Dewatering will be accomplished by pumping
groundwater from the landfill, using one or more pumps, into a pair of 21,000-gallon capacity, fixed axle
tanks arranged in series. The water would then be treated by pumping it through a 25-micron bag filter,
then through a 1-micron bag filter to remove suspended solids; and then through a network of four 2000-
pound capacity media vessels containing a total of 68 cubic feet of Bayoxide® E33 to remove the arsenic
and dissolved solids. The treatment system is sized to accommodate flow rates up to 200 gallons per
minute. The treated water would then be discharged, under the UPDES General Permit for Treated
Groundwater (UTG790000), to a storm drain pipe located near the northwest corner of the Site. lf the
treated water does not meet the discharge requirements stipulated in the UPDES permit, then the water
will be discharged to the sanitary sewer. The effluent sampling requirements will be specified in the
UPDES permit and will be followed. The approximate location of the water treatment system and
discharge to the storm drain are shown on Figure 2. Details regarding the treatment system and filter
media are presented in Appendix B.

3.5 Relocation of Landfill Waste
Trucks and heavy equipment will enter and exit the Site near the northwest corner of the Site and exit
through a track-out area also located near the northwest corner of the Site. To minimize the emission of
landfill gasses and concomitant odors, the excavation and relocation of the landfill waste will be executed
by opening relatively small sections of the landfill (measuring approximately 150 to 200 feet north to south
and by 150 to 200 feet east to west) at a time, working generally from north to south across the Site. The
existing landfill cap material will be retained for future use in the restoration of the landfill cap and will be
placed in a stockpile located near the southeast corner of the Site. Waste will be removed using an
excavator and moved to the redeposition area using scrapers. All municipal waste will be redeposited
within the footprint of the existing landfill and will not be transported outside the footprint of the landfill.
Following the removal of the landfill waste from each section of excavation, the sections will be partially
backfilled and compacted to accommodate the construction of ramps out of the excavation area. Backfill
of the excavation and compaction of the fill material will be performed using the materials and compaction
Wasatch Environmental, Mc. Page 4
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
specifications as specified in the Geotechnical Engineering Study (CMT Engineering, 2018a). The
backfill will be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 1 foot per lift, and each lift will be compacted using an
825 sheepsfoot compactor (or equivalent). The truck entrance/exit, track-out area, areas of waste
removal and redeposition, approximate location of the landfill cap material stockpile, and approximate
traffic patterns for the waste relocation are shown on Figure 2. Once the relocation of the landfill waste
has been completed, the excavated areas will be brought to grade and compacted as specified in the
Geotechnical Engineering Study.
As a contingency, the contractor performing the waste relocation work will have soil available on-site to
use as daily cover when it is needed. Daily cover will be placed over open portions of the landfill if and
when it is needed to reduce wind-blown waste and odors.
3.6 Restoration of Landfill Cap
The landfill cap will be restored, and the surface of the Site will be graded and contoured as shown in
Appendix C. The restored landfill cap will cover the entirety of the upper and lateral surfaces of the areas
of waste redeposition. As specified in the Geotechnical Engineering Study (CMT Engineering, 2018a),
the landfill cap will have a minimum thickness after compaction of 2 feet. Also, as specified in the
Geotechnical Engineering Study, the material used for the landfill cap will have a maximum particle size
of 2 inches, a minimum 20% passing the number 200 sieve, and a minimum Plasticity index of 10, but not
exceeding 30. The existing landfill cap material that will be removed and stockpiled on-site meets these
specifications and should be of sufficient volume to accomplish the restoration of the landfill cap. The
landfill cap will be compacted using an 825 sheepsfoot compactor (or equivalent) to a minimum of 90% of
the maximum dry density as determined by a modified proctor (ASTM D-1557) (CMT Engineering,
2018b).
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
The compaction of the landfill cap will be tested by CMT Engineering Laboratories. Each lift of the landfill
cap will be tested. Compaction tests will be performed at a minimum frequency of one compaction test
per 50,000 square feet of landfill cap.
No additional soil, groundwater, or soil gas samples are expected to be collected in conjunction with the
execution of this work plan. The only samples that will be collected for laboratory analysis are the effluent
samples collected from the water treatment system. A standard level 1 laboratory QC package is
adequate for the effluent samples. No QA/QC samples (i.e., trip blanks, field blanks, field duplicates, etc.)
will be collected.
Laboratory analytical data will be reviewed for completeness with respect to the requested analyses
versus what was actually reported by the laboratory. Specific criteria to be followed include: sample
collection procedures, sample handling, analytical procedures, QC procedures, and data reduction and
processing.
5. HEALTH AND SAFETY
All Site activities would be performed by Wasatch our subcontractors in accordance with Wasatch's
general health and safety policy. A site-specific HASP would also be prepared by Wasatch to address
specific health and safety concerns and establish protocols for conducting work related activities in a safe
manner.
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The proposed schedule for this project is as follows:
Wasatch Environmental, inc. Page 5
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
• Submittal of Work Plan to DWMRC — June 7, 2018;
• DWMRC approval of Work Plan — June 22, 2018;
• Commencement of waste relocation — July 9, 2018;
• Completion of waste relocation — September 9, 2018; and
• Completion of backfill and compaction (not including building pad) — September 22, 2018.
7. PROJECT DELIVERABLES
Wasatch anticipates that the following deliverables would be produced in conjunction with this project:
• Site-Specific HASP — A site-specific HASP would be prepared to address specific health and
safety concerns and establish protocols for conducting work related activities in a safe manner.
The health and safety plan would be submitted to the DWMRC at least 15 days prior to
commencement of field work at the Site.
• Implementation Report — Following completion of the work described in this Work Plan, an
Implementation Report would be produced. The Implementation Report would document the
activities completed under this Work Plan and include photographs documenting the work, and
other relevant documentation (i.e., waste profiles, waste manifests, permits, etc.). The
Implementation Report would be submitted to the DWMRC no later than 30 days following receipt
of all laboratory analytical reports, waste manifests, or other documentation from subcontractors.
• Work Plans — Additional Work plans would be submitted for any Site investigation or remediation
activities at the Site which are not already documented in this Work Plan. The work plans would
include descriptions of the objectives, scopes of work, methods, and related deliverables. The
work plans would be submitted to the DWMRC for review at least 15 days prior to
commencement of the work.
8. REFERENCES
ATC; 2018. Soil Gas Survey Report, Canyon Creek Commercial Center, Phase 10 - East of the
Intersection of Market Place Drive and Canyon Creek Parkway, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660, ATC
Project No. 271EM00390.
Cardno ATC; 2013. Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report, 185 Acre Undeveloped Parcel,
North of Highway 6 and East and West of Chappel Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660, Cardno ATC
Project No. 071 25825 0020.
CMT Engineering Laboratories; 2018a. Final Geotechnical Engineering Study, Commercial
Development, Canyon Creek Parkway & Market Place Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, CMT Project No.
10425.
CMT Engineering Laboratories; 2018b. Letter to Mr. Jered Johnson, Spanish Fork City, Re: Trash Cap,
Canyon Creek Lowes, Spanish Fork, Utah.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental Response and Remediation; 1999.
Innovative Assessment, Spanish Fork Landfill, Spanish Fork, Utah.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental Response and Remediation; 2005.
Preliminary Assessment Report, Expressway Lane Plume, Utah County, Utah, UT0009134958.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc.; 2018. Subsurface Investigation Report, Canyon Creek Commercial Center,
Spanish Fork, Utah, Wasatch Environmental, Inc., Project No. 2273-002.
Wasatch Environmental, inc. Page 6
Figures
DATE: May 25, 2018 FIGURE 1 PROJECT NO.: 2273-002A
.4! 'Lltk•
COO N
i fel C.)
I It r *I 11 11,
Site Location
Scale: 1" equals approximately 1,435'
E 1 01.).ii

1j ' /VI
1,;--.1
IA 1 , Co- _J,•:,/kil
(..7") 4 1 C'•I • C.)4 tr,

I r i •••" -- 0.7 -, • t- .4._ ..._ . ,
- 7
a 10
6 hir t.4
!its 5 a
3 17 'Sfr1FPO,r Ftrk-Ele°'r.'1*_St:, 7-1
,
"
Site Location Map
Canyon Creek Commercial Center
Spanish Fork, Utah
Alk-WASATCH
r1N VIRO NMEN TA t
Environmental Science and Engineering
-4-r.WASATCH General Site Layout
ENVIRONMENTAL
Canyon Creek Commercial Center
S anish Fork, Utah
PROJECT NO. DRAWING DATE Environmental Science and Engineering
LEGEND
Approximate Area of Waste Removal
Approximate Area of Waste Redeposition
Approximate Traffic Pattern for
Relocation of Waste
FIGURE
2 2273-002A l May 25, 2018
Environmental
Oversight Trailer Road Closure
2
51 ACRES Vacated/Out of Service
Existing Road —).1

(1100 East) i
Orange Plastic Safety Fence

Surrounding Work Area 1 Landfill Cap
Material Stockpile
1
la 35 ACRES
Staging Area for
Screening Suspected
Industrial Waste
—
Truck
Track-out Area
Truck i — Entrance/Exit
Treated
Groundwater
Discharge to
Storm Drain ACCESS ROAD
Groundwater Treatment System
C-,, 8000
rE.P,ISH
3 1.20 ACRES
ACCESS ROAD
ACCESS ROAD
Road Closure
/—W1LLOW BROOK'
Scale: 1" equals approximately 130
Appendix A
Public Notice Map
W.; ..,444411444
.-
41•.• • .!:••••4••.'
• 4
13. C ,
°Ad
•

.1.1* SI .14i 4 • r.94.14 „ tka*• • '
. 4 • .• 4 4.414 .4 .4.*, . t ' Ns•
kr .1.14..4 41
Appendix B
Water Treatment System Information
PROPRIETARY CONFIDENTIAL
<4 BAKER 7800 N. DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 500
PLANO, TX 75024-4087
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
CUSTOMER WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL
TITLE:
MATERIAL: SHEET SIZE:
SCALE: _ SHEET: I OF: I
REV: _ °W° SKF4119
QTY: 4
(BAYOXIDE)
The information presented on this drawing is for informational purposes only. Use of this drawing is not a
replacement for a professional engineering evaluation of the application. This drawing is intended to show preliminary equipment requirernenN and arrangernent and is in no way a replacement for a thorough engineering
review of the application at hand. A representative of the asstomer or end user should always conduct the final evaluation of the application. That representative, and not Bakeitorp inc., or its employees and representatives, is
responsible f or the final engineering design and performance of the application.
No warranty is provided or implied, including any warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. As such. the customer agrees that by using the suggestions shown on this drawing, you assume the risk of all loss or Injury resulting from any information found within. in no event shall BakerCorp, or any representative or agent thereof, be liable under any theory based in contract, negligence or strict liability or any other legal ar equitable theory to any party for any amounts including, without limitation. lost revenues. lost profits, lost business or indirect, consequenaal. incidental, special or punitive darnages. This disclaimer shall survive any and all notices advising of the possibility that any user may suffer harm from any inaccuracies contained herein.
The designs, information and data contained herein is proprietary an is submitted in confidence and shall not be disclosed, used or duplicated in whole or in pErt for any urposes whatsoever without prior written permission from Baker Corp. This document shall be returne to Baker Corp. on its demand. Receipt of this document shall be deemed to be an acceptance of the conditions specified herein.
FINISH:
11" x 17"
°W° BY M. BROOKS
CKD BY J. WEEKS DATE 05-18-18
DATE 05-18-18
BRANCH: DEN
4" x (4) BAG FILTER SYSTEM
Eliluipment: L2424304FA415
Flow: 500 Dpm
Dimensions: 4'x4'x6'
QTY: 2 2000 HPV MEDIA VESSEL
Flow Rate: 100 Com (Max)
Capacity: 68 cu. ft.
Dimensions: 4' Dia. x 8' Tall
FLOW
METER
> INFLUENT >
SID
25p 1p
500 BBL FIXED AXLE TANK
EDuipment: Recessed Stairway Fixed Axle
Capacity: 500 BBL (21,000 Gal)
Dimensions: 47' x 8.5' x 11'
QTY: 2
QBAKER

Technical information Manual 2.3.4

PRODUCT DATA SHEET
Janualy 2007'
MODERN FIXED AXLE TANK
("WOOTTON VERSION)
This tenk has a Moab Interior Walt and 'V shaped bottom for easy cleaning.
▪ Capacity
u Height
* Width :
• Length: 'i.e.: 44%10" (overall)

* Weight -- 25,500 lbs.
.STRUCTURelf. MARV
GENERAL INPOR/164770N
VASIGNTIANDMEARSES
500 BBL (21,000 gallons)
1V-9" (grade to top of tank)
• Front
Manway:
II Top Vapor
Connection:
✓ Top Manway
REAnnes - tont
Relief Valve:
Rear Drain:
• Frorit Drain:
s Top FM Line:
* Valves:
» Sides/Ends:
10 Roof Decic
Wall Frame
• Roof Frame:
FE/I rums
• Floor:
2-Front & t-Rear 4"- wafer buttetfly valve.
Cast ion body, 13t.ina-N seat & seals, 316 SS stens Nylon 1 r coated ckictile iron disk W/ plug arid chain Remote operation handle for rear weve.
........ 16 oz.frnd pressure settIng, 0.4 ozitril
vacuum setting Buna-N seal
4--150/4 tank-side weld neck liange mated to valve and 1504 FFT Range
4"-150fl tank-side weld neck flange mated to valve and 15014 FFT flange
3- pipe, top of tank with rap and chain
1/4"fhick ASTM A36 carbon Steel 'V bottom I, sloping frorn each side Mt, the center
!V thick &SIM A36 carbon geel
thick ASTM A36 carbon steel
1/4" thick ASTM A36 carbon steel channels r ! fon exterior side of walls)
'A" thick ASTM A36 carbon steel channels (on exterior side of walls)
suesicEttrÄas
EXtetiOr
Coating
1, Interior
Coating
4 Safety Paint
it Level Gauge
• Stalrway
v Side Manway
Decal
Mounts:
Tires:
Axles:
504 weld neck flange with bleid flange (chained) and Mina N gasket
22" 1.0„ slotted hinges and 5 - V," T or eye bolt with wing nut fasteners, hinged to side
of tank. 'k" Ilat plate or wir If domed ASTM
A36 steel, Duna N formed gasket thermally fused.
zr 1.0., slotted hinges and 5 - 3/4' T or eye bolt wlth wing nut fasteners, hinged away from stairs,. lb" flat plate or 3/8" if domed ASTM A36 steel. Duna N formed gasket, thermally fused.
22" slotted haves and 5 - 44" T or eye bolt with wing nut fasteners, mounted an
passenger slde and hinged to front of tank, fiat plate or 3/8" If domed ASTM A36
steel. Buna N formed gasket thermally fused.
Non-slip with handralls and guardralls;
OSHA compliant
Ball st)le with 2-8r" 304 SS floats. Floor
I supports held floats 1/2" off floor.
' 11.00 x 22,5 (nylon tubeless)
^ Standard 22,5000. Rockwell automatic slack
' adjusters, cast drum and huh 30 service chambers, outboard drums
—1 High gloss polyurethane paint
Chernlcal resistant lining
Safety yellow - handrails hatch covers and
trip hazard surfaces
Removable 1 0.gauge steel, 4,13 4Er, both skies of lank al lop rec-r. Seared wkh
nylock nuts or bolts with lock washers. rEnvairrincATIONS
Test 100% water tested to full capacity, 3 psi -
Perfotmect 20 min test Level t 11 and III inspections on I a scheduled basis
BAKER
To the beet °lour knowledge the technical data corMnod heroin are true and accurate el Outdate of Issuance and are subtect to chime without prior notice. No guarantee claming Is given or implied because variations can and do WI. NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE OF ArCe KIND IS MADE BY BAKERCORPTM, EITHER ENPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
3020 OLD RANCH PARXWer • Sem 220 • SEAL BEACH. CA • 532430-6252
r—Fmn CHANNEL -DP CROSSKusses 4(..s
CVO I
l. i —
V./EILVM
Nee sets esor INOM. \
`-<.1)
TANKtEtED wtrH 1/e 01=1. FLA
SUPPORT BY 10" CHANNEL
KEW! 7.17Y ROSEW ASSEMBLY
ag3(3 %711W5
R E AR
Co BAKER
stAse sar
nn Not Scale
31:120 DID RAIC I PA1KWAY
SEAL BEA.V.I. CA 5074n-2757
DISTaiAL losrn 2
ar- APPROYM CU/CIASS
P. E!
MN NM NM MI MN MI On MO MN OM UM MI 1111O OM I
11111:: AIL %WTI OW DEWS 51).CNCIMeS DOW_ 41e00 IMO. MAU-a SEM, 4,1210 li COCtIto teciss ace cox. WAVLE! AS Swam.. ÁLL Peu. 000X 211:12 le M Deerkuosams stames. sAt. ram OWL SEAS D3 SE WADED 131 aTal PIPARMS, Mara k INIVIMM ID IOW DDSA SIM 111140011 Men Ntal SPEc .12 ow.* sustc 55 wax Masan' *AMP =I 7 Set Masa USW PITS ALL OWL lie A 3$ MDfIs SNIC lea MT at kAges ri 4A. vets
1) Steal Lams IRMA:A WO RA. YOST s002 %rag. WAD SPIT 4' now WIN DIM COP, bie CH*, Z.a. MIMIC ‘1114 auk sem Asrusik. Den. t ,f211. Sava) Le r term wrnt CAP AASI Peas seem aux sun ACP= VMS 11 LOW woe it,rzstr STAMM SIM DCA UPPOPS ets,DS BLLE ve en name me new Owes Ayseive., MALL *LLD, CHAN 10) essfret 27 1/21). DOI= LC Is) V MAWS- YAINE. ITIREMED RAM Mal PM. Was IWASM. 31 In. 0. mow Lo stTc X 22371X2005 TAIC 01X ID Mt SIM. MOIL IA FOAM 1lP10 ISALS 1 r mom %wt. "MOM rbtoltE&IL owa4 cosi spent eararese woos 111) VAS ANIA AL.7.0ssAr10 RASA ADAnTDRS, VCAP0L0 30 STMCX XXIAKODirs, SPPSAPPIP ASSAM. MA= erco ampoonat 5 UM Me 11X51 Venom m cur TAX, igeTS ee LOWR IMPS Leans, se
m *nese lasnE1 OWE 111) i• A a- sex sorEDIED CAP a ',SWAMI) cAP
mama a" MIX iiralEreks mati sx/ACIED 00 OM r+ses 53T7S. cer ease. rattan DPPER a' WEED INSDE Mkt nstiall) ISIM. Cal UW INC V-100005753 PIPE SUPPORIS TARS MIST WA Wale ,f2 aPle MVOS remewati ssFu, *Ms RAI. WAN SAM MIMI
REC*34 Wlakf
inrsremion colielned 7,ersir is emenesary when:two etO VUll Met Ow noormase or rilscloaGk, what. ar In part, cs- WASS hy, any sledges ex Ma Doactvre except 011011 user Otte* eirea wreten avtrarsueson from bikerCom.
a
rasa Smear!! ORPOIC
FIXED AXLE TANK
—

SPE CATIONS: 1) Tanl capacity: 21,007 gallons (MO $D-1,
2) Tank Weight: 25,500 lbs. (empty)
NOTES: 1. This drawing is a baseline represerUition for this model of nlc. Vadationr- between this drawing and the actual equipment in the field can and do Pskr, primnrily wit-, appurtenance laCations, sizes and ouarditles. Consult your local ElakerCorp representative if specific needs exist..
7. THIS TANX. IS NOT OESI(ND FOR TRANSPOR77NG LIOVIDŠ. It should be moved only when empty,
3. ranks ot thls type have an internal tintng (mating) rm -he wetted surfaces.
4. This tank is equipped veil, a pressurarvacuurn relief valve set at 1.0 lbs/SCI. In. Dressler! arid 0.4 oz/so.ln. vacuum.
1111.1 MOD RH mrG. BOTTOM 1 OF 1
S-2-M0007-1- A
2.10.4.5 QBAKER Technical Information Manual
4" 304 Sas. BAG
FILTER SYSTEM
PRODUCT DATA SHEET
Apt rt, 2001
• Sidd: rxr and 2x4- r.s. structural tubing
Through front and rear framing channels
, 'Each pocket is 21' wide) » Forklift
Pockets:
FIL7ERIZSIGN
▪ Krystil Klear L2424304FA4 1 KID-
...... Nine closure bolts and nuts with dava lift
assembly. 24" 0.0., 0.25" this SA-240 Gr
304
24" ao.., o.25- thick wet(' pipe, SA-312 Gr 3D4
. • 4" Male Cam Lock
e 4 150f 304 SS. RFSO Ranges
Four required: One size #2, 7-1/16" snap ring
30" length required Available fibers range
from I to 1500 microns.
n Assembly Num bee
* Top Heact
▪ Shelt
u In/Out Piping:
a inlet & Outlet
a Bag Elernents:
tid Seat Buna N aring
In/Out Valves: 4" 150' butterfly with Buna seat
internal 1..—. 316 SS center guide post, cup spring
Hardwares assembfles
7137S/ [VW/CAMAS'
Test
Performed:
▪ OEM Hydrotested 195 psi. Scheel-lied
CIMS inspections after purchase by BakerCorp.
To the best of cur knowledge the technical data conteined herein are Irue end accurate al the date of issuance end are subject to change without prior notice. No guarantee of accuracy Ps
given or impied because variations can and do atst NO WARRANTY OR. GUARANTEE OF ANY KINO IS MADE BY BAK ERGORP, EITHER EXPRESSE3 OR IPAPUED.
3020 Cid Ranch Patway • Su te 220 • Seal Beach, CA • 552-qq-c2r22
4C->BAKER BAKER
GENERAL IfiFORMATION
Sk1gle %resit, moUnted on a foddiftable skid. HoUsing is not ASME code
stamped. Different filter elements are mailable dependkig on Job requirements and should be specified by the customer prior to use.
WHOM'S AND WARNE'S
Capadtr:
Design Press:
Design Temp:
Height
Depth:
L.— 200 - 500 goal le 5 mit rons and up) I
150 psig
L.— 225"F rnax.
6'-1" (overall)
c-0"
1:-0"
Weight t 850 lbs. ¿approx.)
`Capacity fflowrate) depends on factors such as ilquld viscosity, rrecren value of the fitter media, solids loading etc Assuming water as a filtrate
and factoring in pressure drop only, 500 gpm is a practical upper limit for a sire 02 bag with a 10 micron rating. Clean pressure drop woud be 2-3 psi. Lcevering the micron rating lmreases the pressure drop. The
minimum pressure drop for this unit at higher necron ratings Is 1-2 psi. Filter bags should be changed out at I 5-18 psid, or earlier if the
process requires it. These units are gravity-thew capable
SKID DEg6N
)4 Vessel Leg 3x3x.375 angle, SA•36
Supports: I
ne
t. 45"
2.10.7.8 <-)BAKER Technical information Manual
KLEEN.WATER
1000HPV & 2000HPV PRODUCT DATA SHEET
January, 2007
• TYPes: •Artivated Carbon
•Organoclay
.lort Exchange Resin
•Speciohy Mecka
a interior
Coating:
ig Internals:
la inlet:
a Outlet
4' FNPT
4' FNPT
• Douhe-layered epoxy coating
▪ PVC underdraln
GENERAL INFORM/977M
These units are designed for the efficient purification of
contaminated water or liquid streams. These filters have the ability to remove contaminants to non-detectable levels. The vessels are
constructed of heavy-duty Hid steel and are Fred with a rfouble-
Iayer epoxy coating.
IGHT S AND MEASURES
a Max. Fiowrate I000HPV 80 gprp
20001-IPII 100 gpm
al Max. Pressure: 75 prsl
Mak Temp: --- I gm
I+ Height 1000I1Pli: 70'
20047HPle! 9 6"
Diameter: 48-
4' Shipping Wt*: .... 1 000HPV: /050 ihs. - 3050 lbs
(drum + medial 2000HPV: 3100 ltis. - 5 100 lbs, (' Meth., do,rxru.kra)
24'
Aft
Downflow
operation Is
recommended
FILTER MEDIA
n Volume: I OOLINPV 34 cu ft 2000/11V 68 cu ft
• Weight*: 1000HP1/ T 000 lin, - 2000 Ohs.
i• Medo cimenateal 2000HPV 2000 lbs, - 400(1 Ih5.
MI5CEI1ANEOUS

ri Media Top & side 1 rx 16' manways (heoprerm

Access: gaske:s)
PRESSURE DROP DATA
40 63, 60 70 80 90 1C0
FLOW (gpm)
ANOTE;
T. Wet activated carbon preferential/y removes oxygen from air. ln
cbsed or partially closed containers anci vesse/s, oxygen deplehon
rnay read" hwardoirs levels. If workes are to enter a vessel
containing carboR appropriate procedures for potentially low oxygen spaces musf he followeri. inducing all ferklal and state
requirements.
<4 BAKER
To the best of ctr knuedadge Use technipal c a la car lamed herein are lrue and accorate al the date of ìssuance and 'are suojecl b change without prior notice giaranlee l accuracy is
qiven or Implied hocauso %iodations can arsd rbi odst. NO Y.,ARRekNTY OR GUARANTE OF ANY KIND IS MADE BY BAKERCORP, EITHER EXPRESSED IMPLIED.
3020 Old Ranch Parxwa,i • &ate 220 • Seel Beach, CA • 562-430-6262
SORB 330 As Removal Systems
Adsorption Chemistry and
Process Description
Arsenic Adsorption Chemistry
STS SORB 330 As Removal Process is a fixed bed adsorption system using a granular ferric
oxide media, or adsorbent, called Bayoxidee E33 for the adsorption of dissolved arsenic onto
the ferric oxide. It employs a simple °Pump Trear process that flows pressurized well water
through a fixed bed pressure vessel containing the media where the As removal occurs.
in the SORB 337m Process, both As(III) and As(V) oxyanions are removed from water via a
combination of adsorption, occlusion (adhesion) or solid-solution formation by reaction with
ferric oxide ions. Above pH 7, the primary mechanism is adsorption of the oxyanions to the
surface hydroxyl groups of ferric oxide hydroxide as indicated below:
As(10 Adsorption Reaction
with Bayoxide® E33
/OH • •
(
Fe— OH HO 0
Pi— • #,I, /Fe-0 — As= 0 —O•4sO c + As — 0 + OH-
\
\ OH + H20 As
Fe— OH '0 / \ OH \ Fe— OH 0 01-1 1 •
/ /
c-Fe0OH Arsenate
Adsorption is a continuous process conducted at a specific flow rate or velocity, nomially about 7 GPM/Fta, downward through the fixed bed adsorber for operating periods of about 1 month
on-stream duration. In addition to velocity, the other key process parameter is empty bed
contact time (EBCT). This is the variable which dictates the amount of water contact time within
the bed required to effect complete As adsorption; the normal design value is 3 minutes.
The media adsorbs As(V) with rapid kinetics (adsorption). Unlike other adsorbents, it will also
adsorb As(Ill). Arsenite is nonionic at norrnal water pH's, and therefore, it will not be adsorbed
as an anion. Adsorption kinetics for As(III) are slower than that of As(V), probably because it is
first oxidized by the rnedia before it is adsorbed.
Process Description
As adsorption is a simple treatment process. Flow is downward through a pressure vessel
containing the Bayoxide0 E33 media. The adsorbers can be operated for extended periods of
time (weeks or possibly months) before they are taken out of service for backwashing media.
Once every 1-4 months depending upon the water's quality, each adsorber is taken out of
service for backwashing, or fluffing, to expand the compacted media bed and to remove solids
that may have built up within the bed. Aside from this, there is no other non-service action
required until the end of the pilot program or when the media is exhausted.
Media life ranges from 6 months to 6 years depending upon the systern's utilization factor (on
stream time), on the influent water's As level, and the presence and concentration of other ions
in the water that could shorten the media's As adsorption capacity.
The pressure differential (AP) through each adsorber is monitored. When the AP on either
adsorber exceeds the high AP setpoint (normally 10 psi), that adsorber is automatically taken off
line and backwashed using well water. After the 12 min backwash, the adsorber is returned to
service.
40
Influent As
11.111•111111111111.1111111111•MIN
▪ 30 —
• 20 — co
4.4
4.)
O • 10 -a"' As MCL
0

koala]
Water As As Brealdrou h •

• l• •_•11111Iiiall•allittNil.••••11 0 0. • •
As Adsorption Performance
As Removal performance via adsorption is illustrateal graphically using a "Breakthrough Curve"
such as the one shown below. Performance of an adsorbent is measured by the number of bed
volumes of water that can be treated with one bed volume (BV's)of media before it exhausts,
i.e. can no longer adsorb As efficiently. The adsorption curve below is typical for Bayoxide®
E33 media used in the SORB 330 Process In this case, water containing 32 p.g/L As can be
treated to about 105,000 BV's before the treated water's As level exceeds the MCL of 10 p.g/L.
This is called the breakthrough point.
Typical SORB 33 Arsenic Adsorption Curve
0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000

7Irne {based en 75% Use Facial: 6 Mos 12 Mos 18 Mos
Bed Volumes of Water Treated (BV's)
Monitoring of SORB 33® performance is done by routine analysis of the treated waten Initially,
this can be done on a monthly basis. As the treated water As level increases, this frequency is
increased to semi-monthly so as to be able to schedule media replacement as close to the
breakthrough point as possible without exceeding the MCL. In this case, more frequent analysis
starts at about 85,000 BV's when the As increases about 5 p.g/L. Using the timeline, this would
be at about 84 months, and the analysis is closely monitored until the media is changed out at
about 105,000 BV's, or after 12% months of operation.
Unlike breakthrough curves for water softening resins or some other adsorbents, As will
continue to be adsorbed even after it exceeds the MCL. Softening resin breakthrough curves
breakthrough rapidly to the influent levels (within <1,000 BV's on the above curve) leaving little
time for media change-out, etc.
The advantage of an "extended adsorption" media like E33 is that its As capacity can be
increased in a lead/lag series flow configuration where effluent water from the lead column can
contain as much as 15-20 4/L As because it is further treated in a lag, or polishing, column
where the As level is reduced to <4 pa/L.
AsR-Proc&Ciem-1pg doc
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
LA NXESS
Energizing Chemistry
LANXESS Corporation
Product Safety & Regulatory Affaírs
111 RIDC Park West Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15275-1112
USA
TRANSPORTATION EMERGENCY
CALL CHEMTREC: [phone]
INTERNATIONAL: [phone]
NON-TRANSPORTATION
LANXESS Emergency Phone: [phone]
LANXESS information Phone: (800) LANXESS
1. Product and Company Identification
Product Name:
Material Number:
Color Index Name:
CAS-No.:
Frn.mula:
BAYOXIDE E 33
2653218
Pigment Yellow 42
20344-49-4
Fe0OH
2. Haeards Identification
Emergency Overview
Color: Brown Form: solid Grarniles Odor: Odorless,
Product poses little or no hazard if spilled. May cause mechanical irritation (abrasion).
Potential Health Effects
Primary Routes of Entry: Inhalation, Skin Contact, Eye Contact, Ingestion
Medical Conditions Aggravated by Respiratory disorders
Exposure:
HUMAN EFFEL IS AND SYMPTOMS OF OVEREXPOSURE
General Effects of Exposure
Acute Effects of Exposure
For Product: BAYOXIDE E 33
No applicable information was found concerning any adverse acute health effects from overexposure to this
product,
Chronic Effects of Exposure
For Product: BAYOXIDE E 33
No applicable information was found concerning any adverse chronic health effects from overexposure to
this product.
Materla1Name; BAYOXIDE E 33 Mick Numbec 2653218
Page: 1 or 7 Report Version: 1.1
Carcinogenicity:
No Carcinogenic substances as defined by IARC, NTP and/or OSHA
3. Composition/Information on Ingredients
Hazardous Components
This material is not hazardous under the criteria of the Federal OSHA Hazard Communication Standard 29
CFR 1910.1211O.
4. First Aid Measures
Eye Contact
In case of contact, flush eyes with plenty nf lukewarm water. Get medical attention If irritation develop&
Skin Contact
In case of skin contact, wash affected areas with soap and water,
Inhalation
If inhaled. remove to fresh air. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
Ingestion
If ingested, do not induce vomiting unless directed to do so by medical peisonnel. Gel medical attention.
5. Fire-Pighting Measures
Suitable Extinguishing Media: Material is not combustible. Use extinguishing rnedla suitable for
other combustible rnaterials in the area.
Special Fire Fighting Procedures
Flrefighters should be equipped with self-contained breathing apparatus to protect against potentially toxic
and irritating fumes,
6. Accidental release measures
Spill and Leak Procedures
Spills should be swept up and placed in appropriate containers for disposal. Clean up promptly by scoop or
vacuurn. Avoid creating dusty conditions,
7. Handling and Storage
Storage Period
Unlimited in tightly closed containers.
Handling/Storage Precautions
Materlal Narne: BAYOXIDE E 33 Mick Number: 2653218
Page: 2 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
llandle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety practices. Wash thoroughly after handling.
Keep container closed when not In use. Avoid breathing dust.
Further Info on Storage Conditions
Material can be stored safely at ambient temperatures,
8. Exposure Controls /Personal Protection
Country specific exposure limits have not been established or are not applicable
Industrial Hygiene/Ventilation Measures
Under normal conditions of Ilse, special ventilation is not required.
Respiratory Protection Although no exposure limit has been established for this product, the OSHAPEL for Particulates Not
Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) of 15 mg/m3 • total dust, 5 mg/m3 - respiraole fraction is recommended, In
addition. the ACCTH recommends 3 mg/m3 - itzolrable particles and 10 mg/m3 - inflatable particles for
Particles (Insoluble or poorly soluble) Not Otherwise Specified (PNOS)., The following respirator is
recommended if airborne concentrations exceed the appropriate standard/guideline., NIOSH approved, air-
purifying particulate respirator with N-95 filters.
Eye Protection
safety glasses.
Sldn and body protection
No special skin protection requirements during normal handling and use.
Additional Protective Measures
Employees should wash their hands and face before eating, drinking, or using tobacco products. Educate
and train employees in the safe use and handling of this product,
9. Physical and chemical properties
Form:
Appearance:
Color:
Odor:
pH:
Melting Point:
Flash Point:
Lower Explosion Limit:
Upper Explosion Limit:
Vapor Pressure:
Specific Gravity:
Solubility in Water:
Autoignidon Temperature:
Viscosity. Dynamic:
Bulk Density:
solid
GranuirS
Brown
Odorless
4 - 8 0 50 g/1
Begins at 1.000 °C (1.832 °F)
not applicable
Not Established
Not Establisher'
not applicable
4 - 5 0 20 °C (68 °F)
Insoluble
Not Applicable
not applicable
300 - 1,000 kg/m3
[10. Stability and Reactivity
Hazardous Reactions
Material Name: BVIOXIPE E. 33 ?Ade Number: 2653218
Page: 3 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
Hazardous polymerization does not occur.
Stability
Stable
Conditions to avoid
At temperatures greater than 356 F (180 C) the product will be converted to Fe203.
11. Toxicological Information
Toxicity Data for BAYOX1DE E 33
Acute Oral Toxicity
LD50: > 5,000 mg/kg (Rat)
Skin Irritation
rabbit, Non-lrrhating
Eye Irritation
rabbit, Non-irrltat trig
Toxicity Data for CI. Pigment Yellow 42
Acute Oral Toxicity
LD50; > 5,000 mg/kg (Rat)
Sldn Irritation
rabbit, Non-irritating
Eye Irritation
rabbit, Non-irritating
Carcinogenicity
Rat, Male/Female, intraperitoneal. 8 w,
ambiguous
12. Ecological Information
Ecological Data for BAYOXIDE E 33
Acute and Prolonged Toxicity to Fish
LCO:> 1,000 mg/l (Golden orfe (Leuciscus idus))
Toxicity to Microorganisms
NOEC: > 1,000 mg/1, (Pseudomonas putida)
Ecological Data for C.I. Pigment Yellow 42
Acute and Prolonged Tordclty to Fish
EC5O; > 1,000 mg/I (Golden ode (Leuciscus ldus), 48 it)
Toxicity to Microorganisms
> 10,000 mg/1, (Pseudoinonas putidai
Malarial Name: BAYOME E 33
Page: 1 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
13. Disposal considerations
Waste Disposal Method
Waste disposal should be in accordance with existing federal, state and local environmental control laws.
Empty Contahter Precautions
Recondition or dispose of empty container in accordance with governmental regulations.
14. Transportation information
Land transport (DOT)
Non-Regulated
Sea transport IIMDG)
Noo-Regulated
Air transport (ICAO/1ATA)
Non-Regulated
15. Regulatory Information
United States Federal Reaulations
OSHA Hazeffill Standard Rating: Non-I lazardous
US. Toxic Substances Control Act: Listed on the TSCA Inventory.
US, EPA CERCLA Hazardous Substances 0(1 CFR 302):
Components
None
SARA Section 311/312 Hazard Categories:
Non-hazardous under Section 311/312
US. EPA Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) SARA Title III
Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substance (40 CFR 355. Appendix A):
Components
None
US. EPA Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) SARA Title 111
Section 313 Toxic Chemicals (90 CFR 372.65) - Supplier Notification Required:
Components None
US. EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Composite List of Hazardous Wastes
and Appendix VIII Hazardous Constituents (40 CFR 261):
If discarded in its put-chased form, this product would not be a hazardous waste either by listing or by
characteristic, However, under RCRA. it is the responsibility of the product user to determine at the time
Material Name: BAYOXIDE E 33 Article Number: 2653218
Page: 5 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
of disposal, whether a material containing the product or derived front the product should be classified as a
hazardous waste, (40 CFR 261.20-24)
State Right-To-Know Information
The following chemicals are specifically listed by individual states; other product specific health and safety
data ln other sections of the MSDS may also be applicable for state requirements, For details on your
regulatory requirements yov should contact the appropriate agency in your state.
Potential exposure to the California Proposition 65 chemicals in this product have been determined to be
below the No Significant Risk Level (NSRL)., The concentrations reported below in units of parts per
million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb) are maximum values.
Massachusetts, New Jersey or Pennsylvania Right to Know Substance Lists:
weight % Components CAS-No.
1 - 10096 C.1. Pigment Yellow 42 20344-49-4
MA Right to Know Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance List:
Weight % Components CAS-No.
25 ppm Arsenic 7440-38-2
350 ppm Chromium 7440-47-3
ZOO ppm Nickel (NI) 7440-02-0
California Prop. 65:
To the best of our knowledge, this product does not contain any of the listed chemicals, which the state of
California has found to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.
16. Other Information
704M Rati _ Health 1
Flammability 0
Reactivity 0
Other
0=insignItIcant 1=SUght 2=Moderate 3=1-ligh 4=Extreme
HMIS Ratin
Health _
Flammability 0
Physical Hazard 0
0=M nimal 1=Slight =Mo&1erate 3=Serlous 4=Severe
Chronic Health Hazard
IANXESS Corporation's method of hazard communication is comprised of Product Labels and Material
Safety Data Sheets, JIIItLS and NFPA ratings are provided by IANXESS Corporation as a custorner
service,
Contact Person: Product Safety Department
Telephone: (ROO) LANXESS
MSDS Number: 000000004623
Version Date: 04/01/2005
Report Version: 11
MalerIal Name: I3AYOXIDE E 33 ArUcla Number: 2053218
Page: 6 of 7 Report Version: 1,1
1
1
. , This information is furnished without warranty, express or implied. This Information is believed to be
accurate to the best knowledge of LANXESS Corporation. The information in this MSDS relates only to
the specific material designated herein, LANXESS Corporation assumes no legal responsibility for use of
or reliance upon (he information in this MSDS,
Name: BAYOX IDE R 33 Arilele Number: 26.532J 8
Page: 7 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
SORB 33TM As Removal
Frequently Asked Questions
Bulletin A t
Date: June 21, 2004
Subject: Spent Media Hand i D sposal
Severn Trent Water Purification, Inc.
6416 W. Sligh Ave., Suite 102, Tampa, FL 33634
Tel: [phone] [e-mail]
Q: HOW IS THE SPENT BAYOXIDEO E33 MEDIA CLASSIFIED, AND HOW IS IT DISPOSED?
A: One of the key advantages of Bayoxidee E33 iron oxide adsorbent is its ability to strongly bind
arsenic as water passes through the media through a combination of adsorption, adhesion and other
physical/chemical mechanisms. The iron oxide media haa been tested in multiple lab scale, pilot and
commercial drinking water applications since 1999. The spent media from many of these applications
have been tasted. In each case the spent media passed the USEPA's Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure threshold (TCLP per RCRA 40 CFR 261). The TCLP test is an extraction procedure used for
determining whether the material (media), when discarded, would classify as a hazardous waste.
Based on repeated results, Severn Trent
Services strongly believes that the media
will not be characterized as a hazardous
waste Unless preempted by more stringent
state or local regulations, the spent media is Arsenic
considered a RCRA Subtitle D, non- Barium
hazardous solid waste, suitable for disposal Cadmium
in a sanitary landfill. The table on the right Chromium shows some spent media testing results_
Final disposition and determination is
typically the responsibility of the customer,
since State or federal agencies do not grant
blanket 'approval* or gdisapprovar of spent
materials, but rather allows the generator of such reskluals to make a hazardous waste determination.
For more guidance on testing the spent E33 media, feel free to contact Severn Trent Services for
assistance.
Q: HOW IS THE SPENT MEDIA REMOVED FROM THE SORB 33.10 ADSORBERS?
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
USEPA TCLP
Metal Col 01 Col #2
<0.01 <0.20
0.08 0.24
<C110 <0.10
<0.01 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20
<0.02 <0.02
Toxicity Characteristics
Leaching Procedure (TCLP)
Limit

<0.01 <0.01 r

<0.10 <0.10
•
•
5.1)
100
1.0
5.0
5.0
0.2
1.0
5.0
A: Spent media is removed from adsorber vessels either by vacuuming or under hydraulic pressure.
Vacuuming entails first draining the vessel of water followed by vacuuming the media from the top nozzle
or manway with disinfected or dedicated vacuum truck equipment. This process generates the minimum
amount of wastew ater_
Alternatively, media can be removed from a flooded vessel hydraulically through the bottom or out the
side of the adsorber above the underbedding gravel. 20 PSIG air pressure can force most of the media
out, and a small amount of backwash water flow can hydraulically remove the remainder through the
same nozzle. Underbedding gravel may be removed with the media if the nozzle is on the vessel bottom.
Upon completion of hydraulic media removal, the vessel is drained ard any heel of media remaining in
the vessel is flushed out under water pressure or vacuumed out.
FAQ-A-SpentMedia.doc
Appendix C
Municipal Waste Removal and Relocation Plan (Plan Sheet 601)
SHEET
601
1. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING CLAY -CAP. OF APPROXIMATELY Z AT EXCAVATION AREA AND PLACEMENT AREA. STOCK PILE. 2. REPLACE CLAY CAP OVER RELOCATED TRASH_ PERMEABIUTY . 10 MIN. Z DEPTH
- CLIT TO BOTTOM
CUT TO BOTTOM OF TRASH (TYP) a, TRASH EXCAVATION AREA
APPROXIMATE TRASH & CAP EXCAVATION =73000 CY. (INCLUDES CLAY CAP)
RELOCATION AREA APPROXIMATE FILL =73,000 C.Y.
(INCLUDES CLAY CAP)
------- -----
LEI
- A Utah Corporation -
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
3302 N. Main Street Spanish Fork, UT 84660 Phone: [phone] Fax, 801.798.9393 [e-mail] www.lei-eng.com
REVISIONS
SP
A
N
IS
H

F
OR
K
,

U
T
A
H

CAN
Y
ON

CR
EE
K

SH
O
PP
I
N
G

CEN
TE
R

MUNI
C
IP
A
L

WA
S
T
E RE
M
O
V
AL

A
ND

R
EL
OC
A
TI
O
N

PL
AN

LEI PROJECT /I:
2011-0859
DRAWN EPP
RWH
DESIGNED ET:
BTG
SCALE:
1" = 60'
DATE:
03/16/2018