DSHW-2018-005375 - 0901a06880847be3

Ak WASATCH -11.r ENVIRONMENTAL
Mr. Brad Lauchnor
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
RE: Work Plan for Relocation of Municipal Landfill Waste
Canyon Creek Commercial Center
Spanish Fork, Utah
June 7, 2018
Project No.: 2273-002A
Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
JUN 1 1 2018
TRAF200-005575
Mr. Lauchnor,
On behalf of our client, Spanish Fork City, Wasatch Environmental, inc., is submitting the attached work
plan for the relocation of municipal landfill waste to accommodate the Canyon Creek Commercial Center
development in Spanish Fork, Utah. We are seeking your approval to proceed with the proposed work.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions, comments, or concerns you may have regarding
Canyon Creek Commercial Center project.
Best regards,
Michael Cronin, P.G.
Senior Geologist/Senior Project Manager
2410 WEST CALIFORNIA AVENUE •SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84104
PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]
Website. www.wasatch-environmental com • e-Mail: wei@wasatch-environmentaLcom
WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
WORK PLAN
FOR RELOCATION OF MUNICIPAL LANDFILL WASTE
CANYON CREEK COMMERCIAL CENTER
SPANISH FORK, UTAH
Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
JUN 1 1 2018 Project No. 2273-002A P5tkv -2o0-a5375
Prepared for:
Mr. Jered Johnson
Engineering Division Manager
40 South Main Street
Spanish Fork City, Utah 84660
and
Mr. Brad M. Lauchnor
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Prepared by:
Wasatch Environmental, Inc.
2410 West California Avenue
Salt Lake..City,.1.13: 84104
% \ op MICHAEL S. fo a us CRONIN 0
5546361 •
•
Michael S. Cronin, P.G.
June 7, 2018
2410 WEST CALIFORNIA AVENUE
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84104
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
e-mail. [e-mail] www wasatch-environmentaLcom
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page No.
1. INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Site Description and Location 1

1.2 Site Environmental Issues 1
2. OBJECTIVE 3
3. METHODS 3

3.1 Public Notification and Involvement 3

3.2 Control of Site Access 3

3.3 Environmental Oversight 3

3.4 Excavation Dewatering 4

3.5 Relocation of Landfill Waste 4

3.6 Restoration of Landfill Cap 5
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 5
5. HEALTH AND SAFETY 5
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE 5
7. PROJECT DELIVERABLES 6
8. REFERENCES 6
FIGURES
Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — General Site Layout
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Public Notice Map
Appendix B — Water Treatment System Information
Appendix C — Municipal Waste Removal and Relocation Plan (Plan Sheet 601)
Wasatch Environmental, Mc. Table of Contents
Page i
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
WORK PLAN
FOR RELOCATION OF MUNICIPAL LANDFILL WASTE
CANYON CREEK COMMERCIAL CENTER
SPANISH FORK, UTAH

1. INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Spanish Fork City, the owner of the Spanish Fork and Springville municipal waste landfills
where the waste relocation will occur (Site), Wasatch Environmental, Inc., (Wasatch) has prepared this
Work Plan to document the methods and procedures that will be employed for the relocation of the
municipal landfill waste.

1.1 Site Description and Location
The Site is located along the east side of 1100 East, between 1130 North and the Spanish Fork Parkway,
in the northeastern portion of Spanish Fork, Utah (as shown on Figure 1). The Site occupies the western
portions of the Spanish Fork and Springville municipal waste landfills. There are no other developed uses
of the Site. The Site is located approximately 2,000 feet from the nearest residential development, and
approximately 1,000 feet from the nearest commercial development.

1.2 Site Environmental Issues
Both the Spanish Fork and Springville municipal waste landfills were closed prior to implementation of the
current solid waste regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which
require permitting and increased regulatory oversight of solid waste landfills. Both the Spanish Fork and
Springville municipal waste landfills were unregulated and unlined landfills and are believed to have
received only municipal solid waste. The primary environmental concerns stemming from the use of the
Site as municipal solid waste landfills are:
1. Accumulation of, and potential exposure to, landfill gases (i.e., methane and hydrogen sulfide,
etc.);
2. Potential groundwater contamination resulting from landfill leachate mixing with groundwater;
3. Potential residual soil contamination resulting from landfill leachate contacting the soil beneath
the landfill; and
4. The possibility that potentially hazardous industrial waste may have been buried within the
landfills.
The Site also resides within the area of the Expressway Lane Plume Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) site (UT0009134958). The Expressway Lane
Plume was the subject of an Innovative Assessment conducted by the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ), Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR), in 1999 (DEQ/DERR,
1999). The results of the Innovative Assessment indicated that there were no detections of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), pesticides, or polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) in groundwater; but that several total metals (arsenic, lead, and chromium) were
detected in groundwater at concentration above their respective United States Environmental Protection
Agency (U.S. EPA) Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). The results of the Innovative Assessment
also indicated that the landfills in the area did not appear to be the source of the groundwater
contamination. In the conclusion of the Innovative Assessment report, the DERR postulated that the
observed metals concentrations in groundwater either represent "natural levels for shallow groundwater in
this area or indicate a separate upgradient source." The Expressway Lane Plume was the subject of a
Preliminary Assessment conducted by the DERR, in 2005 (DEQ/DERR, 2005). In the conclusion of the
Preliminary Assessment, the DERR rejected the concept of the metals concentrations in groundwater
originating from a source located upgradient of the landfills and suggest that the landfills were the source.
However, the DERR also acknowledged that they lacked the analytical data to verify this assertion, that
the metals concentrations were "only moderately elevated," and that the U.S. EPA had "judged the
potential risks at this site to be minimal by issuing a 'No Further Remedial Action Planned' designation."
Wasatch Environmental, Inc. Page 1
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
Several more recent subsurface investigations have been conducted which are relevant to the Site, the
results of which are summarized below.
In September 2013, Cardno ATC conducted a limited Phase II subsurface investigation on the property
located immediately west of the Site, and which will be part of the Canyon Creek Commercial Center
development project (Cardno ATC, 2013). Cardon ATC advanced seven soil borings. Three of the soil
borings were completed as monitoring wells and four borings were completed as temporary piezometers.
Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and Priority Pollutant List metals. The analytical
results indicated that no VOCs were detected at concentration above the U.S. EPA Residential Regional
Screening Levels (RSLs) in soil or above the MCLs in groundwater. Arsenic in soil exceeded both the
Residential and Industrial RSLs in two soil samples. The laboratory reporting limits for arsenic exceeded
both the Residential and Industrial RSLs, so conclusions cannot be reached for the remaining samples
that were reported as non-detections. Soils in Utah commonly exhibit elevated background arsenic
concentrations (commonly as high as 30 to 50 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]). The detected arsenic
concentrations and the laboratory reporting limits were below the typical background arsenic
concentrations. Arsenic in groundwater exceeded the MCL in one sample. The laboratory reporting
limits for arsenic exceeded the MCL, so conclusions cannot be reached for the remaining samples that
were reported as non-detections. Groundwater in Utah commonly exhibits elevated background arsenic
concentrations that exceed the MCL.
In February 2018, Wasatch conducted a subsurface investigation at the Site (Wasatch Environmental,
2018). Wasatch advanced seven soil borings, sampling three of the soil borings (EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3)
for soil (immediately beneath the waste where waste occurred), groundwater (within the waste where
waste occurred), and soil gas (within the waste where waste occurred). The remaining four borings were
advanced only for the purpose of logging the thickness of the waste. Soil borings EB-1 and EB-2 were
located within areas of the Site where waste was buried. Boring EB-3 was located immediately south of
the area of the Site where waste was buried. Soil samples were analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
8 metals. Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and RCRA 8 metals. Soil gas samples were
analyzed for VOCs. No VOCs were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding either the Residential or
Industrial U.S. EPA RSLs. No SVOCs were detected in soil. Arsenic was detected in all three soil
samples at concentrations exceeding both the Residential and Industrial U.S. EPA RSLs. No other
RCRA 8 metals were detected at concentrations exceeding either the Residential or Industrial U.S. EPA
RSLs. No VOCs were detected in groundwater at concentrations exceeding the MCLs. Arsenic was
detected in two groundwater samples at concentrations exceeding the MCL. No other RCRA 8 metals
were detected at concentrations exceeding the MCLs. Soil gas samples collected from within the waste
(boring EB-1 and EB-2) exhibited analyte concentrations for several VOCs that exceeded the U.S. EPA
Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) calculator spreadsheet Commercial Target Sub-slab and Exterior
Soil Gas Concentrations. The soil gas sample collected from boring EB-1 also exhibited a methane
concentration significantly above the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL). The soil gas sample collected from
boring EB-3 (located outside of the waste) did not exceed the U.S. EPA VISL calculator spreadsheet
Commercial Target Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Concentrations for any of the VOCs, and the methane
concentration was two orders of magnitude below the LEL.
In March 2018, ATC performed a soil gas survey on the property located immediately west of the Site,
and which will be part of the Canyon Creek Commercial Center development project (ATC, 2018). ATC
collected soil gas samples from 10 locations distributed throughout the property. The soil gas samples
were analyzed for VOCs and methane. None of the soil gas samples exceeded the U.S. EPA VISL
calculator spreadsheet Commercial Target Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Concentrations for any of the
VOCs. Methane was not detected in and of the soil gas samples.
The results of these recent investigations demonstrate that the primary environmental issue related to the
Site is that of elevated arsenic concentrations in soil and groundwater, which is consistent with the
findings previously documented for Expressway Lane Plume CERCLA site. The results of these recent
investigations also appear to demonstrate that VOC concentrations in soil gas (including methane)
decline significantly outside the footprint of the landfills.
Wasatch Environmental, inc. Page 2
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
2. OBJECTWE
The objective of this work is to relocate the municipal landfill waste underlying the Site and restore the
Site to conditions suitable for commercial land use. Therefore, regulatory screening levels will be the
U.S. EPA Industrial RSLs for soil, MCLs for groundwater, and VISL Commercial Target Sub-slab and
Exterior Soil Gas Concentrations for sub-slab and exterior soil gas. The anticipated regulatory closure
status is "corrective action complete with controls." Any engineering controls or land use controls that
may be required to manage residual exposure risks will be addressed in a Site Management Plan and an
Environmental Covenant to be authored after completion of the waste relocation work.
3. METHODS

3.1 Public Notification and Involvement
Public notification and public involvement will be managed by Spanish Fork City's Public Information
Officer, Scott Aylett. Public notification will be performed by distributing an email notice to the
surrounding businesses and residences based on the utility accounts. The email notification will describe
the location of the Site, the work that is being performed, the schedule, and provide contact information.
A map showing the geographic area for which public notification emails will be sent is presented in
Appendix A.

3.2 Control of Site Access
The Site is located in a relatively remote and undeveloped portion of Spanish Fork and; therefore, is not
expected to represent an attractive nuisance. Access to the Site will be controlled by erecting orange,
plastic, construction fencing around the perimeter of the Site and by erecting road closure barricades on
1100 East at the north and south ends of the Site. As 1100 East has been vacated, the road closure
barricades would be erected only as a precaution. The approximate location of the fencing and road
closure barricades are shown on Figure 2.

3.3 Environmental Oversight
A qualified environmental professional will be on-site at all times during execution of the relocation of the
landfill waste. The environmental professional will serve in several capacities during the execution of the
waste relocation.
The environmental professional will be responsible for observing the waste as it is being removed and
identifying any waste that may be considered industrial waste (i.e., drums or significant accumulations of
items that may be industrial waste, etc.). Any waste that is identified by the environmental professional
as being potentially industrial waste will be placed on Visqueen° in a staging area located adjacent to the
excavation (as shown on Figure 2), until the waste can be properly characterized, and a determination
can be made regarding proper handling, transport, and disposal methods. Any waste that is determined
to be industrial waste or hazardous waste will be properly managed, transported, and disposed off-site.
The environmental professional will also serve as the Site Health and Safety Officer during the waste
relocation. In the capacity as Site Health and Safety Officer, the environmental professional will be
responsible for ensuring that workers comply with the Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) and
are using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). In this capacity, the environmental
professional will also be responsible for monitoring landfill gas concentrations in the work area, and
notifying workers to upgrade PPE, or temporarily stop work under specific conditions that will be specified
in the HASP. Wasatch anticipates that the environmental professional will monitor landfill gas
concentrations using a RAE Systems MultiRae IR (or similar instrument) capable of monitoring the lower
explosive limit (LEL) calibrated to methane; as well as the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Wasatch further anticipates that heavy equipment operators who
are working in the landfill excavation be equipped with RAE Systems QRAE 3 4-Gas Monitors (or similar
Wasatch Environmental, Mc. Page 3
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
instrument) capable of monitoring LEL; as well as the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, oxygen, and
carbon monoxide. The environmental professional will be responsible for ensuring that all environmental
field instrumentation is fully charged, properly calibrated, and functional prior to commencement of work
each day.
The environmental professional will also be responsible for collecting the water treatment system effluent
samples as required under the conditions of the Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES)
permit as discussed in Section 3.4 of this Work Plan.
Wasatch does not anticipate the need for collecting additional environmental samples of the soil
underlying the landfill waste, groundwater in the landfill excavation, or soil gas; as the issues related to
these environmental media are well understood and discussed in Section 1.2 of this Work Plan.
However, if conditions arise that indicate a need for the collection of additional environmental samples, it
will be the responsibility of the environmental professional to properly collect, preserve, and document the
collection of environmental samples.
Field conditions, observations, and instrument readings will be documented by the environmental
professional in a field notebook and/or field forms. Execution of the waste relocation work will also be
documented photographically.
The environmental professional will communicate any relevant information or concerns to the
environmental project manager and/or excavation superintendent as appropriate. The environmental
project manager and excavation superintendent will be responsible for communicating directly with
Spanish Fork City (Client) and the regulatory agencies.

3.4 Excavation Dewatering
The landfill waste extends to a depth below the water table; therefore, the excavation will need to be
dewatered to facilitate the relocation of the landfill waste. Dewatering will be accomplished by pumping
groundwater from the landfill, using one or more pumps, into a pair of 21,000-gallon capacity, fixed axle
tanks arranged in series. The water would then be treated by pumping it through a 25-micron bag filter,
then through a 1-micron bag filter to remove suspended solids; and then through a network of four 2000-
pound capacity media vessels containing a total of 68 cubic feet of Bayoxide® E33 to remove the arsenic
and dissolved solids. The treatment system is sized to accommodate flow rates up to 200 gallons per
minute. The treated water would then be discharged, under the UPDES General Permit for Treated
Groundwater (UTG790000), to a storm drain pipe located near the northwest corner of the Site. lf the
treated water does not meet the discharge requirements stipulated in the UPDES permit, then the water
will be discharged to the sanitary sewer. The effluent sampling requirements will be specified in the
UPDES permit and will be followed. The approximate location of the water treatment system and
discharge to the storm drain are shown on Figure 2. Details regarding the treatment system and filter
media are presented in Appendix B.

3.5 Relocation of Landfill Waste
Trucks and heavy equipment will enter and exit the Site near the northwest corner of the Site and exit
through a track-out area also located near the northwest corner of the Site. To minimize the emission of
landfill gasses and concomitant odors, the excavation and relocation of the landfill waste will be executed
by opening relatively small sections of the landfill (measuring approximately 150 to 200 feet north to south
and by 150 to 200 feet east to west) at a time, working generally from north to south across the Site. The
existing landfill cap material will be retained for future use in the restoration of the landfill cap and will be
placed in a stockpile located near the southeast corner of the Site. Waste will be removed using an
excavator and moved to the redeposition area using scrapers. All municipal waste will be redeposited
within the footprint of the existing landfill and will not be transported outside the footprint of the landfill.
Following the removal of the landfill waste from each section of excavation, the sections will be partially
backfilled and compacted to accommodate the construction of ramps out of the excavation area. Backfill
of the excavation and compaction of the fill material will be performed using the materials and compaction
Wasatch Environmental, Inc. Page 4
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
specifications as specified in the Geotechnical Engineering Study (CMT Engineering, 2018a). The
backfill will be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 1 foot per lift, and each lift will be compacted using an
825 sheepsfoot compactor (or equivalent). The truck entrance/exit, track-out area, areas of waste
removal and redeposition, approximate location of the landfill cap material stockpile, and approximate
traffic patterns for the waste relocation are shown on Figure 2. Once the relocation of the landfill waste
has been completed, the excavated areas will be brought to grade and compacted as specified in the
Geotechnical Engineering Study.
3.6 Restoration of Landfill Cap
The landfill cap will be restored, and the surface of the Site will be graded and contoured as shown in
Appendix C. The restored landfill cap will cover the entirety of the upper and lateral surfaces of the areas
of waste redeposition. As specified in the Geotechnical Engineering Study (CMT Engineering, 2018a),
the landfill cap will have a minimum thickness after compaction of 2 feet. Also as specified in the
Geotechnical Engineering Study, the material used for the landfill cap will have a maximum particle size
of 2 inches, a minimum 20% passing the number 200 sieve, and a minimum Plasticity Index of 10, but not
exceeding 30. The existing landfill cap material that will be removed and stockpiled on-site meets these
specifications and should be of sufficient volume to accomplish the restoration of the landfill cap. The
landfill cap will be compacted using an 825 sheepsfoot compactor (or equivalent) to a minimum of 90% of
the maximum dry density as determined by a modified proctor (ASTM D-1557) (CMT Engineering,
2018b).
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
The compaction of the landfill cap will be tested by CMT Engineering Laboratories. Each lift of the landfill
cap will be tested. Compaction tests will be performed at a minimum frequency of one compaction test
per 50,000 square feet of landfill cap.
No additional soil, groundwater, or soil gas samples are expected to be collected in conjunction with the
execution of this work plan. The only samples that will be collected for laboratory analysis are the effluent
samples collected from the water treatment system. A standard level 1 laboratory QC package is
adequate for the effluent samples. No QA/QC samples (i.e., trip blanks, field blanks, field duplicates, etc.)
will be collected.
Laboratory analytical data will be reviewed for completeness with respect to the requested analyses
versus what was actually reported by the laboratory. Specific criteria to be followed include: sample
collection procedures, sample handling, analytical procedures, QC procedures, and data reduction and
processing.
5. HEALTH AND SAFETY
All Site activities would be performed by Wasatch our subcontractors in accordance with Wasatch's
general health and safety policy. A site-specific HASP would also be prepared by Wasatch to address
specific health and safety concerns and establish protocols for conducting work related activities in a safe
manner.
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The proposed schedule for this project is as follows:
• Submittal of Work Plan to DWMRC — June 7, 2018;
• DWMRC approval of Work Plan — June 22, 2018;
• Commencement of waste relocation — July 9, 2018;
• Completion of waste relocation — September 9, 2018; and
Wasatch Environmental, Mc. Page 5
Work Plan Canyon Creek Commercial Center
• Completion of backfill and compaction (not including building pad) — September 22, 2018.
7. PROJECT DELIVERABLES
Wasatch anticipates that the following deliverables would be produced in conjunction with this project:
• Site-Specific HASP — A site-specific HASP would be prepared to address specific health and
safety concerns and establish protocols for conducting work related activities in a safe manner.
The health and safety plan would be submitted to the DWMRC at least 15 days prior to
commencement of field work at the Site.
• Implementation Report — Following completion of the work described in this Work Plan, an
Implementation Report would be produced. The Implementation Report would document the
activities completed under this Work Plan and include photographs documenting the work, and
other relevant documentation (i.e., waste profiles, waste manifests, permits, etc.). The
Implementation Report would be submitted to the DWMRC no later than 30 days following receipt
of all laboratory analytical reports, waste manifests, or other documentation from subcontractors.
• Work Plans — Additional Work plans would be submitted for any Site investigation or remediation
activities at the Site which are not already documented in this Work Plan. The work plans would
include descriptions of the objectives, scopes of work, methods, and related deliverables. The
work plans would be submitted to the DWMRC for review at least 15 days prior to
commencement of the work.
8. REFERENCES
ATC; 2018. Soil Gas Survey Report, Canyon Creek Commercial Center, Phase 10 - East of the
Intersection of Market Place Drive and Canyon Creek Parkway, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660, ATC
Project No. 271EM00390.
Cardno ATC; 2013. Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report, 185 Acre Undeveloped Parcel,
North of Highway 6 and East and West of Chappel Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660, Cardno ATC
Project No. 071 25825 0020.
CMT Engineering Laboratories; 2018a. Final Geotechnical Engineering Study, Commercial
Development, Canyon Creek Parkway & Market Place Drive, Spanish Fork, Utah, CMT Project No.
10425.
CMT Engineering Laboratories; 2018b. Letter to Mr. Jered Johnson, Spanish Fork City, Re: Trash Cap,
Canyon Creek Lowes, Spanish Fork, Utah.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental Response and Remediation; 1999.
Innovative Assessment, Spanish Fork Landfill, Spanish Fork, Utah.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental Response and Remediation; 2005.
Preliminary Assessment Report, Expressway Lane Plume, Utah County, Utah, UT0009134958.
Wasatch Environmental, Inc.; 2018. Subsurface Investigation Report, Canyon Creek Commercial Center,
Spanish Fork, Utah, Wasatch Environmental, Inc., Project No. 2273-002.
Wasatch Environmental, inc. Page 6
Figures
.1600"Vr
' $ 1

..1;' • lk ,
Site Location
4)t
\A/t000 N )
IL •
i 'i ..,,.._„...,5..._ m,
Scale: 1" equals
approximately 1,435 14.1
'
' 4.4
• 4...e, • .5 L- nish Fork Spantsh ForP - ('----'---t . .
, ':
-
0 . E-90,1=1-t1 17- - 1-4 . 4 1 ' , *I.
-—
, IP"*
1 n
• ,..... „, . . ...„ t .1. ----,
.... 1 4
• Z '
: ': ',, .--1' . :- •
Ai
E4,3,2C
• 0,1; A
C) , ez,q)
.7" ;"-`• • r ,7
lErf t•••• 4.- P'-1 0, 0 'Er-.3901\P *ok. , - -
- EL-PPPY
: —
E 100;IN— _
4.•
1• .4
1- .1•Jr -1. 1
WASATCH 11Pr
Site Location Map
Canyon Creek Commercial Center
Spanish Fork, Utah ENVIRONMENT/0
Environmental Science and Engineering PROJECT NO.: 2273-002A DATE: May 25, 2018 FIGURE 1
General Site Layout
ENVIRONMENTAL. 1VWASATCH '10 Canyon Creek Commercial Center
S anish Fork, Utah
FIGURE
2 2273-002A May 25, 2018
PROJECT NO. DRAWING DATE 1 Environmental Science and Engineering
LEGEND
Approximate Area of Waste Removal
Approximate Area of Waste Redeposition
Approximate Traffic Pattern for
Relocation of Waste

1 1

1 I

I I

I 1
I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I / I 1
(
• Environmental
Oversight Trailer Road Closure
r-SPAH IS H FOTKP,1"6-/
Truck
Track-out Area --Lib-
Truck
Entrance/Exit -101*
Treated
Groundwater
Discharge to
Storm Drain --L®
ACCESS ROAD
Groundwater
Treatment
System
ACESS ROAO
; 1 1 1 I / I / / / /
Staging Area for
Screening Suspected
Industrial Waste
3
1.20 ACRES
ACCESS ROAD
ACCESS ROAD
Vacated/Out of Service
Existing Road
(1100 East)
Orange Plastic Safety Fence
Surrounding Work Area
2
1 51 ACRES
Landfill Cap
Material
Stockpile
ANISH FOR CI
10 35 ACRES
FUTURE ACCESS 03Y OTHES1
Road Closure
/WILLOW BROOK./
FUTURE ACCESS
(BY OTHES)
Scale: 1" equals
approximately 130
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
Appendix A
1 Public Notice Map
I
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
i
_ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix B
Water Treatment System Information
> INFLUENT >
500 BBL FIXED AXLE TANK
ELL] ipment: Recessed Stairway Fixed Axle
Capacity: 500 BBL (21,000 Gal)
Dimensions: 47' x 8.5' x 11'
QTY: 2
N/
2000 HPV MEDIA VESSEL
Flow Rate: 100 gni (Max)
Capacity: 68 cu. ft.
Dimensions: _ 4' Dia. x 8' Tall
QTY: 4
(BAYOXIDE)
CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY

25p 1 p

F -1 I-1
NZ
4" x (4) BAG FILTER SYSTEM
ELluipment: L2424304FA415
Flow: 500 gom
Dimensions: 4'x4'x6'
QTY: 2
The designs, information and data contained herein is proprietary an is submitted in confidence and shall not be disd sed, used or duplicated in whole
or in part for any urposes whatsoever without pior written permission from Baker Coro This document
shall be returned to Baker Corp on its demand.
Reoeipt of this document shdl be deemed to be an
acceptance of the conditions specified herein.
SHEET SIZE: MATERIAL:
FINISH:
11" x 17"
TITLE: WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
CUSTOMER' WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH- DEN
DWG BY M. BROOKS DATE 05-18-18 SCALE: SHEET: 1 OF: 1
CKD BY J. WEEKS DATE 05-18-18 DWG SKF4119 REV: _
The information presented on this drawing is for Mformational purposes only. Use of this drawing n not a
replacement for a professional engineering evaluation of the application. This drawing ts intended to show preliminary equipment requirements and arrangement end is in no way a replacement for a thorough engineering
review of the application at hand. A representative of the customer or end user should always conduct the final evaluation of the application. That representative, and not BakerCorp lnc., or its employees and representatives, Is responsible f or the final engineering design and performance of the application.
No warranty is provided or Implied, including any warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. As such, the customer agrees that by using the suggestions shown on this drawing, you assume the risk of all loss or injuty resulting from any information found within. in no event shall BakerCorp, or any representative or agent thereof, be liable under any theory based in contract, negligence or stint liability or any other legal or equitable theory to any party for any amounts including. without limiteion, lost rewnues, lost profits, lost business or indirect, consequential, incidental, special or punitive darn ages. This disclaimer shall survive my and all notices advising of the possibility that any user maysuffer harm from any inaccuracies contained herein.
()BAKER 7800 N. DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 500
PLANO, TX 75024-4087
4.)BAKER Technical tnformation Manual 2.3.4
MODERN FIXED AXLE TANK
(""BOTTOM VERSION)
GENEML INFORM/1170N
This tank has a smooth Interior wall and IP shaped bottom for easy cleaning,
I MGM'S AND MEASURES
Capacity 500 BBL 121,000 gallons)
Height 10,-9" (grade to top of tank?
Width :
Length: 44"-10" (overall?
• Weight •—••• 25,500 lbs.
snivauRN DESIGN
a Floor 1/4"thick ASTM A36 carbon steel V- bottom sloping from each side into the center
SIdes/Endr - ..... 14" thick /WM A36 carbon steel
" Roof Deck: Vi" thick ASIA/ A36 carbon steel
" Wall Frame: te." thick ASTM A36 carbon steel channels fon extedor side of walls)
pi Roof Frame: 1/2 ' thick ASTM A36 carbon steel channels foil exterior side of walls)
FEArusees
FEA771RES — COM
Top Vapor 4-150d weld neck flange with blind flange
Cannectionc (chained) and Duna N gasket
Top Manvvay 22" ID, slotted hinges and 5 - T or eye
bolt with wing nut fasteners, hinged to side ot tank 1/2" flat plate or 3/8' if domed ASTM A36 med. Buna N formed gasket, thermally
fused.
• Front 22- La, slotted hinges and 5 - T or eye
Manway bolt with wing nul fasteners, hinged away
from stairs. 16" flat plate or 3/8" if domed ASTM A36 steel. Bursa N formed gasket,
thermally fused.
• Side Manway, „..... 22" 1.D., slotted hirges arid 5 - or eye bolt with wing nu: fasteners, mounted on
passenger side end hinged to front of tank, 1/2" flat plate nr 3/W lf domed ASTM A36
steel. Bona N formed gasket, thermally
fused.
▪ Stalrway Non slip with handrails and guardrails: OSHA compliant
• LevelGauge: Ball style with 2-8" 304 SS floats. Floor supports hold floats 1/2" off floor.
• Tires: I 1 DO x 22.5 (nylon tubeless?

P, Valves: 2 Front & I Rear: 4' wafer butterfly valve
Cast iron body, Buna-N seat & seals, 316 SS
stern, Nylon 11 coated ckictile iron disk w/ plug and chain Remote operation hanrie
for rear valve,
• Relief Valve: 16 oi/In1 pressure setting C14 0111r( VACUUM setting. Buna-N seal
Rear Drain: 4%15011 tank-side weld neck flange mated to valve and 1500 FPT flange
Front Drain: 4"-1500 tankdde weld neck flange matcd to valve and 1500 FPT Range
Top FIll Line: 3" pipe top of tank with cap arid chain
P, Axles:
SURFACE DETAla
Exterior
Coating:
Interior
Coatlng:
Safety Paint
Decal
Mounts:
TESTIXERTIACAPONS
Standard 22,5000, Rockwell automatic slack adjusters. cast drum and hub, 30 servfce
chambers, outboard drums
High gloss polyurethane paint
Chemical resistant linIng
Safety yellow — hardrails. hatch covers an trip hazard surfaces
Removable 10-gatige steel, 48x48-, both sides of tank at top rear. Secured with
nylock nuts or bolts with lock washers.

II Test 100% water tested to full capadty. 3 psi -
Performed: 20 min test; Level 1, 11 and III inspections on
iled
Cr)BAKER
I To the best of out knowledge the technical data codained herein are hue and accurate at the date of issuance and ere subject to change withcet prior notice. No guarantee or accuracy
ls given or implied because variations can and do exist_ NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE OF ANY KthiCi IS MADE f3Y BAKERCCRP'. EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
3020 OLO RANCH PAiverAY • SulTh no • SEAL BEACH, CA . 562-430-6262
1
MIK won MM te, MOM
I) fusce wows* Loo crvon' 16an Mann. WIER SVC 2)rt.vet WM MC On mCA071 2 , no* WM MM.:. 0144, 21 1/210 01/mM U0 i. PIFFLE 1r11 OM MO 0161111 WETY PAX Wm
CffaCe ./2-11 SWAM MELL 515 sampan? WAD DAUS lfr _tor now • Two Ira, YINW.W. PAL Paw. cow i0) Went . 21 1,,EV. DOW= LW a ) aF. FRAME MLOT. DnEADED TIMM PULL PIM COW 12i LWOW, 1/2712, OVID LAP 11DC 22.3 Is Wks SYLOLt WM. 1 FIEDDES 142411.12171.3 75 4 Ecartaa*:=Dial) %WM WM PLIA WW1
ral ke,12‘140:005.-P71700141branYVEL' Donnanna. i um woe NIC71 SWIMS al) DM TOL WPM MO LOOM WPM LLCMS. 110 7110 LMFTS in won MUM PIXE 11) r 71 4 DIVE 10/WELDED UP 11WEDDED CAP
,r—S.REL 1:344/01E5. IC* COOMMIDIEERS „
704.70 00110EDAD 075T lIšli 411114 DIDI, 11101X-M Vff. NYLON 11 WORE OM WIC, MVO= AS for**. +W. Ontl RCOF MS TO DE COorminotLy 012706M., ALL Dric WELL STOPS 1%1 OE WEI= OP NMI 11110¢, tams. SWIG IONOlipp DNA VMS !YMCA COCO 91111 imam WC 42 Minn MIMED KA OPW, IWPC Oun017 WU* MST 7 pm Mum ipar, RWS Ail SKIL I /4. A-% Sim V-ciarroo SEW Matas wo, tet in C-0114 Pi M WOO
'CD

on
NOME 11. franc co. man!, Pima ma'am eff MO TOW tom on- cum. MUDD UPPED O' DT= NOM %Ma DWI= IDIED. CC. WM aditteriar. lb PIK SLIPPOloM NKR 1/2 miff actiog MOAK/ 70 MOW* iYht PI.0 i5IH 511:P co•Kof
1
\•-TAPIX SUPPORT BY 1D. CION00.
sW—
HMI DUTY NDSES411
TANK MerVCI-ED Wirli 1 /4"STtEi. Nam
Olt PDIP Linalll MEW
RECME14 VIIR7 WOR 171M7
SPECIFICATIONS: 1) Tank Capacity: 21,000 gallors (Set) BEL)
2) Tanic Weight: 25,500 lbs. (empty)
nee !Wyman contained nerd,' Onninny 14, Belte,Cem .en4 utall not b• romodowl tY
disdosei w šhok or in mt. or used loe arty aragn or ilwirulacturo except 774111. USW Dttarli dIrect wrttten strt-avation from Balterr-orb.
4:30 BAKER 3020 OLD RANCH PARKWAY SEAL EIF_ACH. CA 00240-7751
NOTES: 1. This drawing ie e baseline represenntion for this model of Mnk. 'Variations be men this drawing and the actual equipment ln the field can and clo exist, primarily with appurtenance locations, sites and quantifier.. Consult your local EakerCorp representative If specific needs exist. 2_ THIS TANK IS NOT (DESIGNED FOP TRANSPORTING LIQUIDS. It should be moved only when empty.
3. ranks of this type have an internal fining (coating) on the wetted surfaces. 4. This tank Is equipped with a pressurevacuum relief valve set at 1.0 lbs/sq. frt. pressure and 0.4 ozilso.Tri. vacuum.
WAX,
Do Not Scale
DROWN am
13,1B.
rinz MDDERN MFG. V BOTrOM
FIXED AXLE TANK
ORM= nie.
O 0R5544t 5,š MTV
1 SEPO 2
O
A rk.a UA..dtl Sd brt
APPACIY Cenc/CUeeS
MEET
1 OF 1
Iry 7XR 7,matio/ S-2-1440007-1- CAM
0
MI NM NM MI NM NM 1•11•1111- MI I
Info Technica ation Manual 2.10.4.5 C4BAKER
4" 304 &S. BAG
FILTER SYSTEM
PRODUCT DATA SHEET
April, 2007
Single vessel mounted on a forldiftablesIdd. Housing is not ASNIE code
stamped. Different filter elements are available depending on Job
requirements and should be specified by the customer prior to use.
Capacity•:
0 Design Press:
• Design Temp:
• Height:
* Width:
Depth:
Weight
GENERAL INFO/M*1770N
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
-- 4' 0"
-- 850 lbs (approx.!
200 - 500 gpm (0 5 microns and up)
..... 150 wig
225T max.
6'-1" (overall!
Krystil Klearl2424309FA415-51(10
Nine closure boirs and nuts wrth davit lift
assembly 24" OD,. 0.25" thk, SA-240 Cir.
304
•••••• 24" 0.0., 0.25" thick weid pipe. SA-3 12 Gr.
304
...... Male Carn Lock
4" 1500 304 53. RFSO flanges
Four required. One size 1/2, 7- 1/16" snap ring
30" length recpred; Available fibers range
from 1 to 1500 rolcrorts
FILTER DESIGN
• Assembly
Number
• Top Head:
o Shell:
• IrVOut Piping;
• Inlet& Outlet
• Bag Elements:
• UdSeat Bona tsf 0-ring
'Capacity Iflowratej depends on factors such as liquid viscosity, micron
value of the filter media, solids loading etc. Assuming water as a filtrate
and factoring in pressure drop only. 500 gpm is a practical upper limit for a size #2 bag with a 10 micron ratng. Clean pressure drop would be 2-3 psi, towering the micron rating hcreases the pressure drop. The
mum pressure drop for this unit at higher micron ratings is 1-2 psi Filter hags should he changed out at I 5-18 psid, or earlier if the
process requires it. These units are gravity-flow capable.
SKID DESIGN
• fri/Out Valves: 4" 150" butterfly with Buna seat
» Internal ...... 3 16 SS center guide post, cup & spring
Hardware: assemblies
7ESr3'/ CERPRICAVON1
OEM Hydrotested @ 195 psi. Scheduled
OP.45 inspections after purchase by
BakerCorp.
Test
Performed:
ii Skint
* Vessel Leg
Supports:
i. Foridrft
Pockets:
„„.., 2-x7 and 2"x4" c.s structural tubing
3x3k.375 angle, 5A-36
Through front and rear framing channels
f Each pocket s 21 wide)

•4.

BAKER

C4BAKER

To the best of our knowledge the lechnkal data combined herein are Inte end accurate al the date of issuance and are subjed 10 diange without prior nolioe. No guaaniee of accuracy is
given or knelied because variaticns can all cb mist NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE OF ANY KIND IS MADE BY BAXERCORP, EITHER EXPRESSED OFt IMPUED.
3020 Did Ranch Parkway • Sate 220 • Seal Beach, CA • 502-130-6202
Technical Information Manual
KLEEN.WATER
'1000HPV & 2000HPV PRODUCT DATA SHEET
January, 2007
• Volume: I 000HPV 34 cu tt.
70001/PV 68 cu. fr.
0.41114.
Waolt14-19914- PV
GENEML WFORAVIT1ON
These units are designed for the eflicient purification of
contamina:ed water or liquid streams These filters have the ability ta
remove contaminants to non-detectable levels. The vessels are
constructed of heavy-duty mild steel and are lined with a double-
layer epoxy coating.
FILTER MEDIA
• Types: •Ac riveted Carbon
•Cirganoclay
•Ion Exchange Resin
'specially Methe
Weight»: 1000HPV 1 000 lbs. -- 2000 lbs.
Mead deperrim4 2000HPV 200014s. - 4000 lbs.
MIKEZIANEOCIS
• inlet 4" FNPT
• Outlet 4" FNPT
1 Interior Doubrelayered epoxy coating
Coating:
k. Internals: PVC underdrafn
• Media Top & side I rx I 6" rnanways (neoprene
Access gaskets'
PRESS(JRE DROP DATA
10 20 30 40 50 CO 70 BO 90 100
FLOW (gpm)
NOTE: Wet acevated carbon preferentially removes oxygen from air. in
closed or partially closed containers anc vessels, oxygen depletion
rnay reach hazardous leveis, If workers are to enter a vessel
contarning carbon, appropriate procedures for potentially low
oxygen spaces must be followed, including ell federal and stale
requirements.
Cr> BAKER
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
* Max, Flowrate: 1000HPV 130 gpm
2000HPV 100 gpm
* Max. Pressure: 75 psi
ri Max. Temp: 150*F
• Height 10001VV. 70-
2000HPV 96-
* Diameter: 48"
• Shipping Wt*:
(drum + Media) r *meta clepenclen4
000HPV: 2750 lbs - 3050 lbs
2000HPV. 3100 lbs. 5 100 lbs.
D ownfl ow
operation is
recommended
2 5
To the best of otr kncwledge the technical data ccitained herein are true and accurate al the dale of isurance and are subject to change without prior nolce No guarantee of accuracy is
given or impted because variations con and do exist NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE OF ANY KIND IS MADE BY EAKERCORP, EITHER EVRESSED OR IMPLIED.
3020 Old Ranch Parkway • Suite 220 • Sea' Beach, CA • 562,430-6262
SEVERN

SORB 33® As Removal Systems
Adsorption Chemistry and
Process Description

Prcduct r

SERVICES

Arsenic Adsorption Chemistry
STS' SORB 33® As Rernoval Process is a fixed bed adsorption system using a granular ferric
oxide media, or adsorbent, called Bayoxider: E33 for the adsorption of dissolved arsenic onto
the ferric oxide. It employs a simple "Pump & Treat" process that flows pressurized well water
through a fixed bed pressure vessel containing the media where the As removal occurs.
In the SORB 33T" Process, both As(III) and As(V) oxyanions are removed from water via a
combination of adsorption, occlusion (adhesion) or solid-solution formation by reaction with
ferric oxide ions. Above pH 7, the primary mechanism is adsorption of the oxyanions to the
surface hydroxyl groups of ferric oxide hydroxide as indicated below:
As(V) Adsorption Reaction
with Bayoxide® E33
/01-1 ';Fe-0 0
o
\ ‘

Fe—OH HO 0 Fe-0 — As r--- 0
z \ (e. / OH + H20 --e-- a • ,, + As ---4.- 0 \
\ As + OH
Fe—Oz \OH \Fe—OH 0 / \ F \OH e — OH / / /
cl-Fe0OH Arsenate
ACsorption is a continuous process conducted at a specific flow rate or velocity, normally about
7 GPM/Ft2, downward through the fixed bed adsorber for operating periods of about 1 month
on-stream duration. In addition to velocity, the other key process parameter is empty bed
contact time (EBCT). This is the variable which dictates the amount of water contact time within
the bed required to effect complete As adsorption; the normal design value is 3 minutes.
The media adsorbs As(V) with rapid kinetics (adsorption). Unhke other adsorbents, it will also
adsorb As(III), Arsenite is nonionic at normal water pH's, and therefore, it will not be adsorbed
as an anion. Adsorption kinetics for As(III) are slower than that of As(V), probably because it is
first oxidized by the media before it is adsorbed,
Process Description
As adsorption is a simple treatment process. Flow is downward through a pressure vessel
containing the Bayoxide0 E33 media. The adsorbers can be operated for extended periods of
time (weeks or possibly months) before they are taken out of service for backwashing media.
Once every 1-4 months depending upon the water's quality, each adsorber is taken out of
service for backwashing, or fluffing, to expand the cornpacted media bed and to remove solids
that may have built up within the bed. Aside from this, there is no other non-service action
required until the end of the pilot program or when the media is exhausted.
Media life ranges frorn 6 months to 6 years depending upon the system's utilization factor (on
stream time), on the influent water's As level, and the presence and concentration of other ions
in the water that could shorten the media's As adsorption capacity.
The pressure differential (AP) through each adsorber is monitored. When the AP on either
adsorber exceeds the high AP setpoint (normally 10 psi), that adsorber is automatically taken off
line and backwashed using well water. After the 12 min backwash, the adsorber is returned to
service.
OM •••••••11•1•1
40
anIMMINNIMISMI
-•••••••• As MM.
Influent As
Treated
Water As As Breakthrough
o
0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000

Time (based on 75% Use Facto* 6 Mos 12 Mos
Bed Volumes of Water Treated (BV's)
• • • i • i l a i a ail
30 7-3.)
o
o
150,000
18 Mos
As Adsorption Performance
As Removal performance via adsorption is illustrateed graphically using a "Breakthrough Curve"
such as the one shown below. Performance of an adsorbent is measured by the number of bed
volumes of water that can be treated with one bed volume (BV's)of media before it exhausts,
i.e. can no longer adsorb As efficiently. The adsorption curve below is typical for Bayoxide®
E33 media used in the SORB 33® Process. In this case, water containing 32 1,ig/1.. As can be
treated to about 105,000 BVs before the treated water's As level exceeds the MCL of 10 Ag/L
This is called the breakthrough point
Typical SORB 33® Arsenic Adsorption Curve
Monitoring of SORB 330 performance is done by routine analysis of the treated water, Initially,
this can be done on a monthly basis. As the treated water As level increases, this frequency is
increased to semi-monthly so as to be able to schedule media replacement as close to the
breakthrough point as possible without exceeding the MCL. In this case, more frequent analysis
starts at about 85,000 BV's when the As increases about 5 Fig& Using the timeline, this would
be at about 8% rnonths, and the analysis is closely monitored until the media is changed out at
about 105,000 BV's, or after 121/2 months of operation.
Urlike breakthrough curves for water softening resins or some other adsorbents, As will
continue to be adsorbed even after it exceeds the MCL. Softening resin breakthrough curves
breakthrough rapidly to the influent levels (within <1,000 BV's on the above curve) leaving little
time for media change-out, etc.
The advantage of an "extended adsorption" media like E33 is that its As capacity can be
increased in a lead/lag series flow configuration where effluent water from the lead column can
contain as much as 15-20 µg/L As because it is further treated in a lag, or polishing, column
where the As level is reduced to <4 ug/L.
AsR-Proc&Chem-1pg doe
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
LA NXES S
Eherglting Chemistry
LANXESS Corporation
Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs
111 RIDC Park West Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15275-111Z
USA
TRANSPORTATION EMERGENCY
CALL CHEMTREC: [phone]
INTERNATIONAL [phone]
NON-TRANSPORTATION
LANXESS Emergency Phone: [phone]
LANXESS information Phone: (800) LANXESS
1. Product and Company Identification
Product Name:
Material Number
Color Index Name:
CAS-No.: Formula:
BAYOXIDE E 33
2653218
Pigment Yellow 42
20344-49-4
Fe0OH
2, Hazards Identification
Emergency Overview
Color: Brown Form: solid Granules Odor: Odorless.
Product poses little or no hazard if spilled. May cause mechanical irritation (abrasion).
Potential Health Effects
Primary Routes of Entry: Inhalation, Skin Contact, Eye Contact, Ingestion
Medical Conditions Aggravated by Respiratory disorders
Exposure:
HUMAN EtTECTS AND SYMPTOMS OF OVEREXPOSURE
General Effects of Exposure
Acute Effects of Exposure
For Product: BAYOXIDE E 33
No applicable information was found concerning any adverse acute health effects from overexposure to this
product.
Chronic Effects of Exposure
For Product: BAYOXIDE E 33
No applicable information was found concerning any adverse chronic health effects bum overexposure to
thts product
Material Namc BAYOXIDEII 33 Article Number; 2653218
Page: 1 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
Carcinogenicitv:
No Carcinogenic substances as defined by 1ARC, NTP and/or OSIIA
3. Composition/Information on Ingredients
Hazardous Components
This material is not hazardous under the criteria of the Federal OSHA liazard Communication Standard 29
CFR 1910.1200.
4. First Aid Measures
Eye Contact
In case of contact, flush eyes with plenty nf lukewarm water. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
Skin Contact
In case of skin contact. wash affected areas with soap and water.
Inhalation
If inhaled. remove to fresh air. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
Ingestion
If ingested. do not indum vomiting unless directed to do so by medical personnel. Get medical attention,
5. Fire-Fighting Measures
Suitable Extinguishin Material is not combustible. Use extinguishing media suitable for
other combustible materials in the area.
Special Fire Fighting Procedures
Firefighters should be equipped with self-contained breathing apparatus to protect against potentially toxic
and irritating fumes.
6. Accidental release measures
Spill and Leak Procedures
Spills should be swept up and placed in appropriate containers for disposal. Clean up promptly by scoop or
vacuum. Avoid creating dusty conditions.
ndllng and Storage
Storage Period
Unlimited in tightly closed containers.
Handling/Storage Precautions
Material Narne BAYOXIDE E 33 Article Number: 2653218
Page: 2 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
Ilandle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety practices. Wash thoroughly after handling.
Keep container closed when not In use. Avoid breathing dust,
Further Info on Storage Conditions
Material ran be stored safely at ambient temperatures,
8. Exposure Controb !Personal Protection
Country specific exposure limits have not been established or are not applicable
Industrial Hygiene/Ventilation Measures
Under normal conditions of use, special ventilation is not required.
Respiratory Protection
Although no exposure limit has been established for this product, the OSHA PEL for Particulates Not
Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) of 15 mg/m3 - total dust, 5 mg/m3 - respirable fraction is reconuneaded. In
addition. the ACGIH imommerids 3 mg/m3 - respirable par(icles and 10 mg/m3 - inhalable particles for
Particles (insoluble or poorly soluble) Not Otherwise Specified (PNOS)., The following respiratot is
recommended if airborne concentrations exceed the appropriate standard/guideline.. NIOSII approved. air-
purifying particulate respirator with N-95 filters,
Eye Protection
safety glasses,
Skin and body protection
No special skin protection requirements during normal handling and use.
Additional Protective Measures Employees should wash their hands and face before eating, drinking, or using tobacco products. Nucate
and train employees in the safe use and handling of this produa
9. Physical and chensical properties
Form: Appearance:
Color:
Odor:
pH:
Melting Point:
Flash Point:
Lower Explosion Limit: Upper Explosion Limit:
Vapor Pressure:
Specific Gravity:
Solubility in Water:
Autoignition Temperature:
Viscosity. Dynamic:
Bulk Density:
solid
Granules
Brown
Odorless
4-8 @50g/1
Begins at 1,000 °C (1.93Z °F) not applicable
Not Established
Not F.stahlished
not applicable
4-5 @ 20 'C (68 °F)
Insoluble
Not Applicable
not applicable
300 - 1,000 kg/m3
10 Stability anti Reactivity
Hazardous Reactions
Material Name: BAYOXIDE E 33 Article Numttr: 2653218
Page: 3 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
Hazarcloo polymerization does not occur.
Stability
Stable
Conditions to avoid
At temperatures greater than 356 F (180 C) the product wUl be converted to Fe203.
11. Toxicological Information
Toxicitv Data for BAYOX1DE E 33
Acute Oral Toxicity
1O50: > 5,000 mg/kg (Rat)
Skin Irritation
rabbit, Non-irritating
Eye Irritation
rabbit, Non-kritailng
Toxicity Data for C.1 Pigment Yellow 42
Acute Oral Toxicity
LD50: > 5,000 mg/kg (Rat)
Skin Irritation
rabbit, Non-irritating
Eye Irritation
rabbit, Non-irritating
Cardnogenldty
Rat, Male/Female, intraperitoneal, 8 w.
ambiguous
12. Ecological Information
Ecological Data for BAYOXIDE E 33
Acute and Prolonged Toxicity (o Fish
LCO; > 1,000 miill (Golden orfe (Leociscus idus))
Toxicity to Microorganisms
NOEC: > 1,000 mg/1. (Pseudomonas putida)
Ecological Data for CI Pigment Yellow 42
Acute and Prolonged Toxicity to Fish
EC50: > 1.000 mg/1 (Golden orfe (Leuciscus Wits), 48 it)
Toxicity to Microorganisms
> 10,000 mg/1, (Pseudomonas putida)
Moeda! Name: BAYOXIDE E 33 Article Nemter: 2653218
Page: 4 of 7 Repori Versiun: I. 1
13. Disposal considerations
Waste Disposal Method
Waste disposal should he in accordance with existing federal, state and local environmental control laws.
Empty Container Precautions
Recondition or dispose of empty container in accordance with governmental regulations.
14. Transportation information
Land transport (DOT)
Non-Regulated
Sea transport (IMDGI
Non-Regulated
Air transport (ICAO/TATA)
Non-Regulated
15. Regulatory Information
lJnited States Federal RCM,latiorts
OSHA Hazcom Standard Rating: Non-i lazardous
US. Toxic Substances Control Act: Listed on the TSCA Inventory.
US. EPA CERCLA Hazardous Substances (40 CFR 302):
Components
None
SARA Section 311/312 Hazard Categories:
Non-hazardous under Section 311/312
US. EPA Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) SARA Title 111
Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substance (40 CFR 355, Appendix A);
Components
None
US. EPA Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) SARA Title 111
Section 313 Toxic Chemicals (40 CFR 372.65) - Supplier Notification Requlred:
Components None
US. EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Composite List of Hazardous Wastes
and Appendix VIII Hazardous Constituents (0 CFR 261):
If discarded in its purchased form, this product would not be a hazardous waste either by listing ot by
characteristic. However, under RCRA, it is the responsibility of the product user to determine at the time
Miterlal Name: BAYOXIDE E 33 AtUde Numbn: 2653218
Page: 5 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
of disposal, whether a material containing the product or derived from the product should be classified as a
hazardous waste. (40 CFR 261.20-24)
State Right-To-Know Information
The following chemicals are specifically listed by individual states-. other product specific health and safety
data in other sections of the MSDS may also be applicable for state requirements. For details on your
regulatory requirements you should contact the appropriate agency in your state.
Potential exposure to the California Proposition 65 chemicals in this product have been determined to be
below the No Significant Risk Level (NSRL)„ The concentration.s reported below in units of parts per
million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb) are maximum values.
Massachusetts, New Jersey or Pennsylvania Right to Know Substance Lists:
Weleht % Components CAS-No.
1 - 100% C.I. Pigment Yellow 42 20344-49-4
MA Right to Know Extraordhiarily Hazardous Substance List:
Weight % Components CAS-No.
25 ppm Arsenic 7440-38-2
350 ppm Chromium 7440-47-3
200 ppm Nickel (NO 7440-02-0
California Prop. 65:
To the best of our knowledge, this product does not contain any of the listed chemicals, which the state of
California has found to cause cancer. birth defects or other reproductive harm.
16.0therInformatim
NFPA 704M Rati _ Health 1
—Flammability 0
Reactivity 0
Other
0=lnsignifican
HMIS Rat
light 2=Moderate 3=High 4=Extreme
Health
Flammabliity 0
Physical Hazard
0=Minirnal 1=Slight 2=Moderate 3=Serlous 4=Severe
* = Chronic Health Hazard
IANXESS Corporation's method of hazard communication is comprised of Product Labels and Material
Safety Data Sheets. I IMIS and NFPA ratings are provided by LANXESS Corporation as a customer
service.
Contact Person: Product Safety Department
Telephone: (800) LANXESS
MSDS Number: 000000004623
Version Date: 04/01/2005
Report Version: 1.1
Malerial Name: BAYOMDE E 33 ArWelquinWNSUM
Page: 6 or 7 Report Version: 1.1
This information is furnished without warranty, express or implied. This laformallon is believed to be
accurate to the best knowledge of LANXESS Corporation. The inforrretion In this MSDS relates only to
the specific material designated herein, LANXESS Corporation assumes no legal responsibility for use of
or reliance upon the information in this MSDS,
Material Nam: BAYOXIDE E 33 1 Article NumLer: 2653218
Page: 7 of 7 Report Version: 1.1
USEPA TCLP
Metal
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
SiNer
<0.20 <0.20 r 5.0
<0.02 <0.02 0.2 • <0.01 <0.01 1.0
<0.10 <0.10 r 6.0
Toxicity Characteristics
Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

Col #1 Col 02 Limit

<0.01 <0.20 5.0 r 0 r ,08 0,24 100 •

<0.10 <0.10 1.0 r

<0.01 <0.20 5.0
SORB 33TM As Removal
Frequently Asked Questions
Bulletin A
Date: June 21, 2004
Subject: Spent Media Handlin pose!
1?.
Severn Trent Water Purification, Inc.
5415 W. Sligh Ave., &de 102, Terme, FL 33834 Tel: 813 :•:6 9331 [e-mail]
Q: How is THE SPENT BAYOXIDES E33 MEDIA CLASSIFIED, AND HOW IS IT DISPOSED?
A: One of the key advantages of Bayoxide® E33 iron oAde adsorbent is its ability to strongly bind
arsenic as water passes through the media through a combination of adsorption, adhesion and other
physical/chemical mechanisms. The iron oxide media has been tested in multiple lab scale, pilot and
commercial drinking water applications since 1999. The spent media from many of these applications
have been tested. In each case the spent media passed the USEPA's Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure threshold (TCLP per RCRA 40 CFR 261). The TCLP test ls an extraction procedure used for
determining whether the rnaterial (media), when discarded, would classify as a hazardous waste.
Based on repeated results, Sevem Trent
Services strongly believes that the media
will not be characterized as a hazardous
waste Unless preempted by more stringent
state or local regulations, the spent media is
considered a RCRA Subtitle D, non-
hazardous solid waste, suitable for disposal
in a sanitary landfill_ The table on the right
shows some spent media testing results.
Final disposition and determination is
typically the responsibility of the customer,
since State or federal agencies do not grant
blanket "approver or "disapprover of spent
materials, but rather allows the generator of such residuals to make a hazardous waste determination.
For more guidance on testing the spent E33 media, feel free to contact Severn Trent Services for
assistance.
Q: HOW IS THE SPENT MEDIA REMOVED FROM THE SORB 33TM ADSORBERS?
A: Spent media is removed from adsorber vessels either by vacuuming or under hydraulic pressure.
Vacuuming entails first draining the vessel of water followed by vacuuming the media from the top nozzle
or rnanway with disinfected or dedicated vacuum truck equipment. This process generates the minimum
amount of wastewater.
Alternatively, media can be removed from a flooded vessel hydraulically through the bottom or out the
side of the adsorber above the underbedding gravel. 20 MG air pressure can force most of the media
out, and a small amount of backwash water flow can hydraulically remove the remainder through the
same nozzle. Underbedding gravel may be removed with the media if the nozzle is on the vessel bottom.
Upon completion of hydraulic media removal, the vessel is drained and any heel of media remaining in
the vessel is flushed out under water pressure or vacuumed out.
FAD-A-SpentMedia.doc
Appendix C
Municipal Waste Removal and Relocation Plan (Plan Sheet 601)
SHEET
601
EX S'FANCIZIPE
1. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING CIAY 'CAP OF APPROXIMATELY 2' AT EXCAVATION AREA AND PLACEMENT AREA. STOCK PILE. 2. REPLACE CLAY CAP OVER RE-OCATED TRASH. PERMEABIUTY 10 , LSFLZ DEPTH.
REVISIONS
• -
• -
LEI PROJECT E
2011-0859
DRAWN EP
RWH
DESIGNED BY:
BTG
SCALE 1" = 50'
DATE:
03/16/2018
I
UT TO BOTTOM OF TRASH (TYP) w I TRASH EXCAVATION AREA APPROXIMATE TRASH 8 CAP EXCAVATION 473,000 C.V. ((NCLUDES CLAY CAP)
RELOCATION AREA APPROXIMATE FILL = 73,000 C.Y. (INCLUDES CLAY CAP)
LEI
• A Utah Corporation -
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
PLANNERS
3302 N. Mein Street Spanish Fork, UT 84660 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] officeelel-eng.com www.lei-eng.com
SP
A
N
I
S
H
F
O
R
K
,

U
T
A
H

CA
N
Y
O
N

C
R
E
E
K

S
H
O
P
P
I
N
G

C
E
N
T
E
R

MU
NI
C
I
P
A
L

WA
S
T
E

R
E
M
O
V
A
L

A
N
D

R
EL
O
C
A
T
I
O
N

PL
A
N