DRC-2018-006675 - 0901a0688086f7da

72_C-2010-006675
INSPECTION REPORT FOR:
EnergySolutions
DATE OF INSPECTION:
May 24, 2018
FACILITY ADDRESS:
180 Exit 49
Grantsville, Utah 84029
FACILITY CONTACT:
Dan Webinger
APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS:
CQA/QC, Rev 28b
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
Module 8 Engineering CWF Inspection
PARTICIPANTS:
Dan Webinger, Nick Clarke, David Esser
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
76 Degree and Sunny
TIME IN:
9:00 am
TIME OUT:
2:30 pm
REPORT PREPARED BY:
David Esser
FACILITY DESCRIPTION:
2016 approved CFW facility, and the 2005 approved CWF facility both located in north end of
the Class A west embankment
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITES:
The CFW facilities are used to dispose of resins liners in shielded sand or concrete. The CWF
has high radical nuclear material in liners or drums. The liners and drums are handled remotely
with cranes and shielding works during lifting and placement of shipments into the disposal cell.
NARRATIVE:
A field inspection was done in the 2005 and 2016 CWF areas. The inspection reviewed the
engineering paperwork and field engineering conditions for compliance with the engineering
CQA/QC manual. A shipment was observed being placed in the 2016 CWF and the perimeter
was looked at for compliance issues. The 2005 CWF was field looked at for final lift approval.
Paperwork was reviewed for both CWF areas and documents were put in the inspection folder
for the record.
ISSUES:
Close out was held with Nick Clarke and Dan Webinger to discuss observation.
SIGNATURE:
David Esser June 7, 2018
01 eoc" bHzoi g
cott T. An erson, Director
State of Utah
GARY R HERBERT
Governor
SPENCER J COX
Lieutenant Governor
Department of
Environmental Quality
Alan Matheson
Executive Director
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
AND RADIATION CONTROL
Scott T Anderson
Director
June 18, 2018
Vern Rogers, Manager
Compliance and Permitting
EnergySolutions, LLC
299 South Main Street, Suite 1700
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
RE: 2018 Engineering Inspection Module 8 — Containerized Waste Facility (CWF)
Radioactive Material License UT2300249
Dear Mr. Rogers:
On May 24, 2018, an engineering inspection was conducted at the EnergySolutions Clive facility by a
representative of the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control. The inspection period covered
May 2017 to May 2018 and included the inspection of the 2016 CWF and the final lift approvals for the 2010
CWF.
The CWF inspection included a review of the license, license amendments, test pad documents,
interrogatories, current and past CQA/QC revisions, CWF field inspection, daily log inspections, past and
current engineering reviews, and EnergySolutions staff interviews. In addition, EnergySolutions has
established some good spreadsheets and drawings to help track waste generator placement. The inspection
specifically looked at resin liners to be placed vertical to help avoid resin spills.
There were no notable deficiencies during the site CWF inspection and the 2018 inspection. This letter is a
closeout of the various items that have been inspected in 2018.
If you have any questions, please call David Esser at [phone].
Sincerely,
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
(Over)
DRC-2018-005861 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address P 0 Box 144880 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D D [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
STA/DKE/km
c: Jeff Coombs, EHS, Health Officer, Tooele County Health Department
Bryan Slade, Environmental Health Director, Tooele County Health Department
s/17 — qzyliT Inspection Checklist — 2018
Waste Placement
MODULE 8 WASTE PLACEMENT - CWF
UTAH DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RADIATION
CONTROL INSPECTION FORM
Facility Inspected: ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC., near Clive, Utah
Regulatory Requirements Inspected Against: COA/OC, Rev 28b.
License-in-Force (date): % /14 /17 (Amendment number 2 / )
Last (Previous) Inspection Date: 5 /17 Date(s) of Current Inspection: Viy//V
Inspection Staff: DA-v . 4
Range of Records Inspected: From 5/17 To Siiiita
Total number of records for the period /2 Number of records examined by DRC staff /2____
Location of CWF facility being inspected &fess ,.4 No r-g
Background Documents / Engineering Design Basis
1. General Statement: Design Basis/ Performance Standards:
The Containerized Waste Facility (CWF) is design to dispose of water tight sealed containers.
All the CWF design specification and performance objectives are found in this CWF check list.
Some of the important aspects of the CWF are: resin liner spacing requirements, sand properties,
void space in the container, outside slope requirements (3H:1V), horizontal set by the license and
vertical location in the embankment is the bottom 2/3 of the embankment, and foundation and
final cover requirements. The main goal is to build the CWF, so the settlement (0.02 ft/ft) does
not transfer to the radon barrier and cause failure of the radon barrier. Important issues are: 1)
Concrete caisson are not required in the CWF, but are used for several purposes like shielding,
and site stability. Steel rings can also be used for shielding and spacing, but must be removed
prior to backfill.
2. Approved Geotechnical Engineering Reports:
Title Date of the Document
Class A Disposal Cell Containerized Waste Facility 12-Apr-01
Fifteen Percent Viod Space Criteria rev 1 10-Oct-01
AMEC letter Placement of Drums and B-25 containers with 15 percent voids 2-Oct-01
AMEC Placement of Large Liners in Caissons 19-Jun-02
Letter CD02-0097 Placement of Large liners/HICs 18-Mar-02
Letter CD02-0269 Placement of Large liners/HICs 3-Jul-02
Letter CD02-0315 Placement of Large liners/HICs - Revised Settlement
Analysis 7-Aug-02
Letter CD02-0315 Placement of Large liners/HICs - Revision 15 LLRW
CQA/QC 26-Aug-02
Letter CD01-0296 Placement of ION-Exchange Resins in HICs ans steel
liners 5-Jul-01
Page 1 of 5
Inspection Checklist — 2018
Waste Placement
3. Approved Engineering Design Drawings:
Drawing Title Drawing Name
Date of the
document
04080-004 Proposed CWF & LC
rev 2 AREAS 19-Oct-04
04080-006
rev 2 Proposed CWF AREA 19-Oct-04
4. Es Test Pad Reports and DRC Approval letters:
Title Date of the document
Letter CD07-0308 CWF Test Pad Report for the CWF Tri-Arc Test Pad Plan 18-Sep-07
Letter CD02-0315 Placement of Large liners/HICs - Revised Settlement
Analysis 7-Aug-02
Letter CD02-0315 Placement of Large liners/HICs - Revision 15 LLRW
CQA/QC 26-Aug-02
5. URS Letter Report:
Title Date of the document
Suitability of Reusable Steel Caissons for Placement of HICs 19-Mar-07
OVERVIEW OF INSPECTION MODULE
Lift Identification — Specification
Lift Acceptance — Specification
Backfill Cover Thickness — Specification
Containerized Waste Placement — Specification; General
Containerized Waste Placement — Specification; Cylindrical Containers Greater
Containerized Waste Placement — Specification; Unusually Shaped Containers
Containerized Waste Placement — Large Components and oversized DOT Containers — Large Liner
Containerized Waste Placement - Horizontal drums
Pyramid Controls — Specification
Backfill Cover Compaction — Specification
Set Back of Waste — Specification
Snow Removal — Specification
Final Grading — Specification
Inspection Summary
Page 2 of 5
Inspection Checklist - 2017
Waste Placement
Lift Identification: Each lift shall be given a discrete
designation for testing and surveying purposes.
Lift Acceptance: At the time of acceptance, the date and time of
lift approval shall be recorded.
Backfill Cover Thickness: Specification
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Test pad review
Comments: - Árrct "test" A-41 Iry 4r-c7e.
VIOLATION Yes No .X (CQA/QC, Rev. 28, page 56 of 117)
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Specification; General
Comments: I 3 1 100,4 t/S d •
VIOLATION Yes NoX(CQA/QC,Rev.281,,page57of117)
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Comments:1-6 - 11-rch Gv167 Ak4k4NA 0.04,13,A, 4:1111)L Ov\Alk
-
VIOLATION Yes No)c. (CQA/QC, Rev. 281s, page 58 of 117)
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Comments:
VIOLATION Yes No )‹. (CQA/QC, Rev. 284 page 59 of 117)
Page 3 of 5
Inspection Checklist — 2017
Waste Placement
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Comments: 13k 4.1,‘„0 k
VIOLATION Yes No X (CQA/QC, Rev. 28, page 60 of 117)
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Comments:
VIOLATION Yes No (CQA/QC, Rev. 2811, page 61 of 117)
Specification; General
Comments: ctk-sd 10-4.eal c ood,
VIOLATION Yes No k (CQA/QC, Rev. 24, page 62 of 117)
Backfill Cover Compaction - Specification
Comment s : P_ / -C sp0,0,21 rd.. '61C
VIOLATION Yes NcoX (CQA/QC, Rev. 24, page 63 of 117)
Specification:
Comment s :
if ice c k.
VIOLATION Yes No (CQA/QC, Rev. 28, page 64 of 117)
- Specification
Comments: ok_
Page 4 of 5
Inspection Checklist — 2017
Waste Placement
VIOLATION Yes No)c (CQA/QC, Rev. 28a, page 65 of 117)
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Comments : 2-S C S iNvS 6ki 106-
- ?At : 11/ ok-
VIOLATION Yes No X (CQA/QC, Rev. 288, page 66 of 117)
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Comment s :
VIOLATION Yes NciA (CQA/QC, Rev. 284, page 67 of 117)
Containerized Waste Placement: Specification; General
Comments:
VIOLATION Yes NoX (CQA/QC, Rev. 24, page 68 of 117)
Comment s : 6kOvcii C;14 —0/U
VIOLATION Yes No (CQA/QC, Rev. 28.1), page 69 of 117)
Comment s : cti "611/4
VIOLATION Yes No (CQA/QC, Rev. 281, page 70 of 117)
Comments : a I ovce 6k.
Page 5 of 5
ENERGVSOLVT1ON
CL-QC-PR-002-F15
Rev. 0
CWF LIFT APPROVAL FORM
LIFT
NEW
Loose
PROJECT: X CAW OTHER
NW CORNER DATE: 330/2018
AW012100107—?
P 1
21 0010'-1 AWFil
EW: X —
NS
P 2 EW:
NS:
P 3
ENV.
NS: =
P 4
EW:
NS:
P 5
Page 2 attached: In
IDENTIFY LIFT CONFIGURATION ABOVE
ID: AWII12100107-1 NW CORNER: N 14609.82 E 11552.81 BASE LIFT ELEVATION: 4267.2
WASTE GENERATOR ID NUMBER(S): See data stored hi DXF map.
TOTAL
Container
Moisture
Backfilled
Backfilled
Observation
INTERMEDIATE
ACTIVE PLACEMENT AREA SINCE LAST
ACTIVE PLACEMENT AREA (including thm lift).
6" Sand Inspection Results (including initials/date):
Placement Inspection Results (including mitials/datc):
content testing for backfill performed each day
Containers Inspection Results (including ininals/date):
Inspection Results following ConsolidationNibration
Results from Compaction of Intermediate Sand
SAND THICKNESS: See Imensediete
MOISTURE/DENSITY
123,902 ft"
TEST See comments
S. Daily Construction Reports (ES-1902 & CL-QC-PR-002-1/2) from 1/07/10 to 3/30/18.
See Daily Construction Reports.
of backfilhng and meets monuments (attach results). Inspector
See Daily Construction Reports.
See Daily Construction Reports.
(including nitials/date):
(including inittals/date):
Seed Litt Approve.
See Daily Construction Reports.
See Daily Construction Reports.
SACKFUL COVER THICKNESS.
Backlit! Cover Lift Approvals.
see aseken Carer Lift Approvab
Observation
DENSITY
Results from Compaction of Backfdl Cover
TEST ID NUMBER(S): See Intermediate
(mcluding initials/date): See
Sand and Backfill Cover Lift Approvals.
spproval is for the AWH12100107-1
COMMENTS:
Pyramid AWI112100107 has been divided into two separate lift ID's (M41112100107-1 & AWI112100107-2). This lift
3,074
and Includes 1st and 2ad tier. (See attacked mum) Totsl lift area ofAWHl2IO0šO7 is 126,476 ftlAW6I.2100107-1 = 123,902 Wand A 1112100107-2 =
fP).
Intermediate Sand layers were documented on LIR Approvals. (See altaelted slap and l(4 approval documentation for ilWII12100107,AW71121001071S-01
through -04, AH11121709255-01 , through -05. 4WM21709051S-01, and WM7091913-02 for details)
Backfill Cover igen were documented on lift approvals. (See attached map and l(ft approval docummtation for AWE! 2 l 00107-02,011112100107-a
4WH12100107.8F-01 dtrough -04, 1WH121709268F-01 through -05, A1911121801.16BF-06, AW71.12180209BF-07,1WH12.18022610-08, AW1112180309BF-09,
AWM2170908BF-01, one I 4WH.12170919BP-02 fir additional details)
Vold Remediations and CLSIVI me as fill are doeumented on EngineeriniQuality Control memorandums. CLSM use as fill was limited to the Initial lift of the
pyramid. No large linen were placed In r.
LIFT .... APPROVED)IY: DATE: 3/30/2018 TIME: 15:20
--1----- APPROVA DATE QA APPROVAL DATE
EnergySolations
Clive, Utah Page 1_ of,a_L-Wel
EXPLANATIONS:
The red shaded area located on the 1st tier Intermediate Sand layer map is for Ilft ID AWH12180402IS-06. During the
review of the documentation for the AWH12 CWF lift approval it was found that this small portion of the intermediate
sand on top of the 1st tier had not been documented as being placed and compacted (See NCR CL-NCR18-002).
•
QC Technician
SOLUTIOAS
CL-QC-PR-002-F15 Rev. 0
CONTINUATION SHEET
EnergySolutions Clive, Utah Page 2 of 7
-1
> 42 ft
••••••••••••••
)(
/ •
.10010;4110)41.-
4;14littfOrT442:1:41,
.40 41,
*Aitififsa,P. 1,4* fmn
Ak• 4117. 4.qatro
)(
> 70 ft
> 56 ft
> 37 ft
...)( C - ,9460•4 ./lt? '1•4 *0 > 37 ft l
: folt I'Vki 4- V-i-E** of...r. i tslr604: *V+ ('‘,4004:11/4.41, .e. ,Atv•e„../4/ *--, 1•Ite/i011-t•-( (•_-*AliP TO-NV•ts.,4/1R1104,10.$4,4003 (
)1 liNi.S.44
4"
. 46
,e1,41.4- .
r,
tlif20)
,
:
_if
ets ''.-(-
Ntoertioit011.4%41-**NO *' Nto")4T41,*"' --)*'‘0":4'-ILL • )( to.oxisostlr-vatr\e-144, etibiog...prot.,...its‘ 4,17/or 47 , g• • .... Lb, 00.-010 fk s re) 1011.04-41-4.. 4.3'-• 4.1411 - 4 ,
> 54 ft 0 eirette litelellraefk- (114%,...(10. :_ : ) r. ltArie t 'AV *AKA' 4 . ) 410) .401
.1v..... IV 414. ..si-4,40001 riti •%-'r''r
# P •-stir* `7'/Liii,-- ,0104tiktpr' .140. )
..,.. ..'10.71.rtrp\--* 011010.417#AS1110110*-1141): tr2t; ) ...... 4004940,...* 4.-, ,,,,/ ,. ..orkee 1/4.... '-le4 • -kw L40-404-10440: tot ovolow, 44„0".014404. .0.),#t )( i
' ;•141,4**P* :ftio,aoliel• ,,,,„4- s As:Of 4 ( a so ;0). vp w....- 40.411t •Rk 4.,, 411.- .....re ,
tte: 1/19Y-1.41, 10 ;-0:kaslis, -*1:).-(01,4,.(ree
-Oro f ,-**::41: , . 7:10,1),••4*, rert,tostrig71/4411, a %."--11444 1 )1* 2.revili0t0 'N-40-014tt`A I% 4". -1,....4, . . . -Iv ...-40..-A0:,..101..,- ,,g, • Ate ,, - ***- %-• -‘10,,imift , , vflp‘ irw 4:6•0 %1/4-41,41g "ir ,-0.—to .- 4.4-0..14..., • ,•\ Ibtf e"est4 -100'.-4.7$1`04,s.:4- vAtiale co • --.; It'•.-,40.4i4FS,f4r474*-1, - 6,10v 4xtiszleiorC).4 _ . ,0,,,trink,„01..011,1,4004.1,t0)--4*.ves uji--io-oy4fc.)--404011.,3/4.1100.61,,efell sg,14-‘4*.log , 0 • • fp-4.)c** / oigt",elq-,0.4%- • No) , 1Iva , C''') 0-0" C_)` 0.--. 0 0 0 ( ) l P". s..—V—•...,;..—P—c—).,...R ',-4:—."---) ' `j—... > 54 ft
2nd Tier Exten > 50 ft
1st Tier Extents

6

ENERGYSOLUTIONS
ENEROYSOUJTIONS "CLIVE FACILOY
CONTAJNERIZED WASTE FACUTT
CWF Waste Liner Offset

CLIVE, UTAH

.05rneTE SY COMMON Or CWAG£

AWH1210010713F-04 AWH12100107BF-03
AWH12180309BF-09
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
EmERGysournoms CLNt FACIUN
CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACIUTY
CWF Boddie Cover 1s1 Tier
CLIVE, UTAH IMESCMPTION Or CNANCE
AWH12180226BF-08
AWH12170926BF-05
AWH12100107-03 //
°AWH12100107-2
(Not included in \
this lift approval)
N
AWH
12
1
70
9
26
B
F-
01
AWH12100107-02
AWH12170926BF-03
AWH12180116BF-06
AWH12
1
7
0
926
BF-
04
AW
H12
18
02
09
BF-
07

t\
,. , 0 tz , , ,
Alf I AWH12 Boxes, drums, and other c tainers
less than 5' tall. (No Intermediate Sand Required)
AWH12170925IS-05
AWH12100107IS-05 AWH121001071S-04
AWH121001071S-02
5et,
oit 10)
AWH12100107
AW
H
12
17
0925
1S-
02
QI AWH12170925IS-03
/-7// //

2

ENERGYSOLUTIONS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS •tuvr FACIUTY
CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY
CWF Intemedlote Send Layer 1st Tier

CLIVE, UTAH

A DATE

DESORPTION Of PONCE

•
AWH12170908BF-01
C.2
AWH12170919BF-02
416

1:1

E

ENERGYSOLUTIONS

ENERGYSOLLMONS UNE FACIUTY
CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILRY

ft>

AWH1 2 Bonkfill Cove 2nd Wor

CLIVE, UTAH

15

AWH 12170905IS-01
AWH121709191S-02
o
'x
IV
I it!

a. i
0 r.,.. M 0
1.-• 0
EN ERGYSOLUTIONS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS •cuvr FAcury
CONTAMERIZED WASTE FACIUTY
12 Intermediate Sand 2nd 11
Br DESclainioNer CAVOC CLIVE, UTAH
Div of Waste Management
and Radiation Control
MAR 1 3 2018
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
PC-201 -0o2sLH
March 13, 2018 CD18-0047
Mr. Scott T. Anderson
Director
Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Subject: Radioactive Material License UT2300249; Condition 29.F — Annual
Containerized Waste Facility Void Report for 2017
Dear Mr. Anderson:
In accordance with condition 29.F of Radioactive Material License UT2300249,
EnergySolutions herein reports the cumulative void space disposed in the Containerized
Waste Facility (CWF) for 2017. License Condition 16.M requires that all waste
containers received for disposal at the CWF be filled to a minimum of 85 percent (90%
for large containers). A database has been established for each CWF generator that
trends each specific waste type that generators ship to CWF, (ie. resin, DAW). A
baseline density is established for each waste type. This baseline density is used with
the waste volume (volume of waste inside the container) and the internal volume of the
disposal container, to determine the void within the container. Using the void space
calculated for each container received for disposal, a cumulative void space for all
CWF-destined waste disposed during 2017 is determined.
Cumulative waste volume for 2017: 62,957.84 ft3
Cumulative internal volume for 2017: 66,890.40 ft3
Cumulative void space for 2017 = [1 — (62,957.84/66,890.40)] x 100 = 5.9%
The 2017 cumulative void at the CWF is well below the maximum allowed 15%. Please
contact me at [phone] with any questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Vern C. Rogers e cleo Mar 12 2018 1:24 PM
ilan
Vern C. Rogers
Manager, Compliance and Permitting
cc Don Verbica, DWMRC
299 South Main Street, Suite 1700 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
[phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.energysolutions.com
Div of Waste Management
and Radration Control

ENERGYSOLUTIONS

MAR 15 2fl17

DS1-1W-20(6-- 001573
CD18-0050 March 14, 2018
Mr. Scott T. Anderson
Director
Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Subject: EPA ID Number UTD982598898
Radioactive Material License UT2300249
Independent CQA/QC Audit Reports in 2017
Dear Mr. Anderson,
RECEIVED
MAR 1 5 2018
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DUALITY
Condition V.C.22. within Module V, Disposal in Landfills, of the state-issued Part B
Permit and Specification 14 within the LLRW and lle.(2) Construction Quality
Assurance/Quality Control (CQA/QC) Manual require EnergySolutions to contract with
an independent firm to perform an annual audit of the CQA/QC program. In 2017, an
audit was conducted for Class A and two separate audits were conducted of the Mixed
Waste area. All three audit reports are attached.
Should there be any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 801-649-
2144.
Sincerely,
Timo y L. Orton, P.E.
Environmental Engineer and Manager
cc: Don Verbica, DWMRC
l certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the
system, or those persons responsible for gathering the information, the infonnation submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
299 South Main Street, Suite 1700 • Sah Lake City, Utah 84111
[phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.energysolutions.com
MAR 1 5 2017 ENERGYSOLUTIONS
Div of Waste Management
and Radation Control
March 14, 2018
Mr. Scott T. Anderson
Director
Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Subject: EPA ID Number UTD982598898
Radioactive Material License UT2300249
Independent CQA/QC Audit RePorts in 2017
Dear Mr. Anderson,
CD18-0050
RECEIVED
MAR 1 5 2018
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DUALITY
Condition V.C.22. within Module V, Disposal in Landfills, of the state-issued Part B
Permit and Specification 14 within the LLRW and lle.(2) Construction Quality
Assurance/Quality Control (CQA/QC) Manual require EnergySolutions to contract with
an independent firm to perform an annual audit of the CQA/QC program. In 2017, an
audit was conducted for Class A and two separate audits were conducted of the Mixed
Waste area. All three audit reports are attached.
Should there be any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 801-649-
2144.
Sincerely,
Timot y L. Orton, P.E.
Environmental Engineer and Manager
cc: Don Verbica, DWMRC
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
299 South Main Street, Suite 1700 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
[phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.energysolutions.com
May 25, 2017
Mr. Dan Webinger
Quality Assurance Specialist
EnergySolutions - Clive Facility
299 South Main Street, Suite 1700
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Re: December 2016 thru April 2017 - QA/QC Assessment Period Report - Clive Site,
Class A Waste Area (Including the Containerized Waste Facility, Class A and 11e(2))
PO Number 673209, Surveillance Number 1705-005
Dear Mr. Webinger:
Paul Hansen Associates was requested by EnergySolutions to perform an independent
assessment review of the Construction Quality Control / Quality Assurance activities as
required by the Construction QA/QC Manual. The QA/QC Manual was revised effective
January 31, 2017. Therefore, documentation dated prior to January 31, 2017 was
reviewed as per Revision 27a, dated October 8, 2014. Documentation dated after
January 31, 2017 was revised in accordance with Revision 28a, dated January 31, 2017.
This review includes work performed by EnergySolutions personnel related to
construction and waste disposal activities within the Class A Waste Facility (including the
Containerized Waste Facility, Class A and 11 e(2)) during the assessment period of
December 2016 thru April 2017. A site visit was made to the facility by Paul Hansen,
P.E. on May 19, 2017.
EnergySolutions personnel reported that work related activities occurred within the
following areas during the assessment period:
Waste Placement
CLSM Placement
Caisson Placement for Containerized Waste
Containerized Waste Placement
In Cell Bulk Disposal / Placement
The 15% minimum review of the paperwork documentation for the assessment period
was selected randomly, with additional specific follow-up of selected items to ensure
consistency between documentation. The documentation available at the time of review
included daily construction reports for all work areas; general waste placement and
containerized waste placement; lift approval forms and density test forms; lift surveys;
compactor coverage; CLSM approvals; containerized waste caisson and waste
placement drawings; void remediation; top of waste survey data and other documentation
available for review. In addition to the 15% minimum review, all lifts were reviewed for lift
thickness, and documentation indicated that the weekly ramp, monthly berm and waste
1073 EAST 11780 SOUTH SANDY, UTAH 84094 801418-9119 P 801-819-9118 F
CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS
Sincerely,
Paul G. Hj sen, P.E.
Principal
Mr. Dan Webinger
May 25, 2017
Page 2 of 2
set-back inspections were performed. The Quality Assurance Specialist and the Quality
Control Supervisor indicated that this review included paperwork from all work performed
during the audit period.
During the audit two minor inconsistencies were noted in the documentation, as follows:
1. Clay Proctor S32170410, sampled 4/20/17, is described on the lab sheets as "Brown and grey clay" with reported values of 95.6 lbs/ft3 and 25.3% moisture.
However, Lift Approval AWL09161219TC-01, dated 4/20/17, references Proctor
ID S32170410 as "Brown and white clay", using reported values of 95.6 lbslft3 and 25.3% moisture.
After discussion with both QC and QA personnel, the Lift Approval for
AWL09161219TC-01 was corrected to match the description of Clay Proctor 832170410.
2. Daily Report 12/5/16 (inside support) references AWAO7TC as top of waste.
However, the associated top of waste survey identifies the lift as AWA07..
After discussion with both QC and QA personnel, the Daily Report for 1215/16
(inside support) was modified to identify the top of waste surve as AWA07.
No other deficiencies or conflicts were observed in the documentation reviewed or in the
field observations at the time of our visit. .
Field observations for this audit included observation of operations removal of excess
waste from area C12, waste placement in area AWK19, compaction of waste in area
AWF09, top of waste grade preliminary check by QC and QA in area U12, and general
site conditions.
Please note that this report is based upon a 15% minimum review of the available
paperwork, and upon observation of conditions observed at the time of the site visit, as
required by the QA/QC Manual. As a result, our review should not be interpreted as
comprehensive.
We appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this important project. Please Call if
you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance.
1073 EAST 11780 SOUTH SANDY, UTAH 84094 801-818-9119 P 801-819-9118 F
CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS
May 26, 2017
Mr. Dan Webinger
Quality Assurance Specialist
EnergySolutions - Clive Facility
299 South Main Street, Suite 1700
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Re: December 2016 thru April 2017 - QNQC Assessment Period Report - Clive Site,
Mixed Waste Area - Waste Placement
PO Number 673209, Surveillance Number 1705-005
Dear Mr. Webinger:
Paul Hansen Associates was requested by Energysolutions to perform an independent
assessment review of the Construction Quality Control / Quality Assurance activities as
required by the Construction QA/QC Manual (Revision 27a, dated October 8, 2014).
This review includes work performed by EnergySolutions personnel related to waste
disposal activities within the Mixed Waste Facility during the assessment period of
December 2016 thru April 2017. A site visit was made to the facility by Paul Hansen,
P.E. on May 19, 2017.
EnergySolutions personnel reported that work related activities occurred within the
following areas during the audit period:
Waste Placement
CLSM
In Cell Bulk Disposal / Placement
The 15% minimum review of the paperwork documentation for the audit period was
selected randomly, with additional specific follow-up of selected items to ensure
consistency between documentation. The documentation available at the time of
review included daily construction reports, top of waste survey, lift approval forms,
density test forms, classification proctors, temporary cover surveys, and other
documentation available for review. In addition to the 15% minimum review, all lifts
were reviewed for lift thickness, and documentation observed which indicated that the
weekly ramp, monthly berm and waste set-back inspections were performed. The
Quality Assurance Specialist and the Quality Control Supervisor indicated that this
review included paperwork from all work performed during the audit period.
1079 EAST 11780 SOUTH SANDY. UTAH 84094 801-818-9119 P 801-819-9118 F
CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS
Mr. Dan Webinger
May 25, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Field observations for this audit included observation of general site conditions. No
other waste placement activities were actively occurring at the time of our visit.
Based upon our review, no deficiencies were observed in the documentation
reviewed at the time of our visit. Please note that this report is based upon a 15%
minimum review of the available paperwork, and upon observation of conditions
observed at the time of the site visit, as required by the Construction QA/QC Manual.
As a result, our review should not be interpreted as comprehensive.
We appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this important project. Please call
if you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Paul G. Ha , P.E.
Principal
1073 EAST 11780 SOUTH SANDY, UTAH 84094 801-818-9119 P 801-819-9118 F
CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS
January 17, 2018
Mr. Dan Webinger II
Quality Assurance Specialist
Energysolutions - Clive Facility
299 South Main Street, Suite 1700
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Re: May thru December 2017 - QA/QC Assessment Period Report - Clive Site,
Mixed Waste Area - Waste Placement
PO Number 677987, Surveillance Number 1801-005
Dear Mr. Webinger:
Paul Hansen Associates was requested by Energysolutions to perform an independent
assessment review of the Construction Quality Control / Quality Assurance activities as
required by the Construction QA/QC Manual. Documentation dated prior to August 18,
2017 was reviewed as per Revision 27a. Documentation dated after August 18, 2017
was revised in accordance with Revision 28b.
This review includes work performed by EnergySolutions personnel related to waste
disposal activities within the Mixed Waste Facility during the assessment period of May
thru December 2017. A site visit was made to the facility by Paul Hansen, P.E. on
January 16 and 17, 2018.
EnergySolutions personnel reported that work related activities occurred within the
following areas during the audit period:
Waste Placement
CLSM
In Cell Bulk Disposal / Placement
The 15% minimum review of the paperwork documentation for the audit period was
selected randomly, with additional specific follow-up of selected items to ensure
consistency between documentation. The documentation available at the time of
review included daily construction reports, top of waste survey, lift approval forms,
density test forms, classification proctors; temporary cover, berm and settlement
surveys, and other documentation available for review. In addition to the 15% minimum
review, all lifts were reviewed for lift thickness, and documentation observed which
indicated that the weekly ramp, monthly berm and waste set-back inspections were
1073 EAST 11780 SOUTH SANDY, UTAH 84094 801-818-0119 P 801-819-9118 F
CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS
Mr. Dan Webinger
January 17, 2018
Page 2 of 2
performed. The Quality Assurance Specialist and the Quality Control Supervisor
indicated that this review included paperwork from all work performed during the audit period.
Field observations for this audit included observation of general site conditions. No
other waste placement activities were occurring at the time of our visit.
Based upon our review, no deficiencies were observed in the documentation reviewed at the time of our visit.
Please note that this report is based upon a 15% minimum review of the available
paperwork, and upon observation of conditions observed at the time of the site visit, as
required by the Construction QA/QC Manual. As a result, our review should not be
interpreted as comprehensive.
We appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this important project. Please call
if you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Paul G. H
Principal
en, P.E.
1073 EAST 11780 SOUTH SANDY, UTA14 84094 801-818-9119 P 801-819-9118 F CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS
ENERGYSOLUTIONS Engineering/Quality Control
Memorandum
To: File
From: Ryan Youngberg, QC Tech 1--ty- --) )2.1 \ A -1
cc: Nick Clarke, Quality Control Sup.A. 7("r05/0
Date: 07/21/2017
Subject: CWF Shipment(s) 4582 & 4609 (Void Remediation)
This memo summarizes the testing performed on the CLSM used for the Void Remediation of shipment
number(s) 4582 & 4609 that was void remediated on 07/21/2017.
The CLSM used as void remediation for shipment number(s) 4582 & 4609 was tested for flow consistency in
accordance with ASTM D6103, Standard Test Method for Flow Consistency of Controlled Low Strength
Material.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Cell disposal map
• Void Remediation Forms
• EC-1923, CLSM Testing Forms
• Batch plant load ticket
PI(
ople
• 120 ft'
Pre-job briefing complete: HPT:=5151)/1 fee
Container inspected and readied for fill: OPS:
QC:
HP
Container Void Remediated
D. 1(20
;Alf Date: 7/2-07
Date:
Date: 7 -2,1 `.2)b
Date: 7/Z(//7
7/zi OPS
Date 7-?,1-251C)-IPT
Operation complete:

Void Remediation Form
CL-CW-PR-102- Rev. 1
F1 EN ERCYSOLUT 101415
C: 0-1601
Bates Number: -CA458-2- 4;t:-At-a/ Container ID Number: P0663428-4
Contents: Carbon Resin
Director of Health Physics Authorization:,./ Date: ila//7
ei(a) Container Internal Volume:_178.3 ft3 (b) Container Waste
(c) Void = (a) - (b) 58.3 ft3
(e) CLSM required to fill container: = (c) divided by 27 = 2.1 yds'
Date -712.1 1/7 QC 4•P- AP- limv
CWF Operations Manager Date
Page 1 of 1
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and rnay becorne outdated. Refer to the intraweb oi the docurnent control authority for the current revision
Date:
Container Void Remediated
Operation complete:

Void Remediation Form
CL-CW-PR-142- Rev. 1
F1 FRIASOLUMWS
Bates Number: Container ID Number: Oa-- /7-003
Contents: !ÔOfzeNsit
Director of Health Physics Authorization:
(a) Container Internal Volume: 99 ft3 (b) Container Waste Volume:
(c) Void = (a) - (b) l ft3
(e) CLSM required to fill container: = (c) divided by 27 O yds3
Pre-job briefing complete: HPT: A f,ritfj
Container inspected and readied for fill: OPS:
ft3
QC: Date: ?/21
HAT: Date:
Date:
7/Z1/ 17ops
Date 7(-2,617HPT
PP- 40.111PAIIIIMPIP Date 7/2') / QC
CWF Operations Manager
Page 1 of 1
Eicemmic documents. once printed. are uncontrolled tind may become outdated. Refer to the intraweb or the document control authority for the current revision.
11- Date
Temperature only
Load #
Initial Screening
Design Mix 1S-0 pss
Load Acceptance 500 PSI
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CLSM Testing Form
CL-QC-PR-002-F11
Rev. 0
PROJECT: CAW MW 11 e.(2) OTHER (specify)
Lift la Av/ E f" Sample ID # 2_. Date:
Ambient Temp. 74W °F Sample Temp. 3 2- °F Water added g/A- gal. Ticket # 7 ..c3
UNIT WEIGHT TEST (ASTM 06023)
Time Sample Taken Time of Measurement QC Tech.
Al 7-1( - I 7
Volume of Measure (V) ft3. Lit Weight o re (W) lbs.

Weight of Measure w/ CLSM (MC) lbs. CLSM Weight

CLSM Unit Weight = [WC / V] = Ib1ft3.
FLOW CONSISTENCY TEST (ASTM 06103)
Time Sample Taken 3.'17 Start Time of Test 3; i 8 QC Tech.
1st Measurement (F) (,5- in. 2nd Measurement (S) in. Average [(F+S)/2] q, S-S in.
COMMENTS/EXPLANATIONS:
F73-/7
DATE DA QA APPROV
lbs.
(when pounng begins, every urs dunng pour, and at the end of the day if ambient temperatu less than 35° F) Daily Temperature Measurements
COLD WEATHER REQUIREMENTS (if ambient temperature is less titan 35° F)
Ambient temperatures are less than 35°F for three successive days.
o area tented and heated for 24 hours prior to pouring.
Temperatures 'de tented area continuously monitored on opposite end of tent from where heat is applied.
7-2,1-r? Ambient temperature in tented area heated to above 50° F for a minimum of 12 hours prior to pouring.
Sufficient tenting/covering availa • • o completely cover and keep CLSM above 40° F
Pour area limited to 4800 ft2.
Record the temperature of each CLSM load prior to intr ction into the cell.
Temperature of CLSM poured previous day (on f ovemight ambient <35°F)
°F @ (time) for CLSM poured on
°F @ (time)
°F @ (time)
°F (time)
°F (time)
°F (time)
°F (tim
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page of
Energy Solutions
Date: 7/21/17 Time: 12:50:59 Plvl Ticket: 26466
Customer
LLRW
Ordered Quantity
250
Delivered Quantity
140
Delivery Address
Lift ID ft,i 9.43-47
rjrZiterri2AFPFP /(‘
V( (\
-70PYr

Mix ID Load Size Mix Description Truck # Slump
CLSM 10.00 150 PSI CLSM 9.00
Qc- t cri_1.4 vc-r, ei 13z)
Safety Begins with you
Batch: 26445 Load: 2670 Ticket 26465 7121/2017
Mix IO: CLSM Mix Damnation: 150 PSI CLSM

Volume: 10 Yd Trot& WIC Repo: 0.8902 Drops: 1

Marla Target Actual Stain Moisture Tol % Nahum Target meta statue
UME FINES 25,000 LB 21,060 LB Manual % (15.76)
UME FINES1 LB 2930 LB Manual
FLY ASH 3,600 LB 3,570 LB Done 13.83) CEMENT 1,500 LB 1,485 U3 Done .00) WATER
Start Tlme: 12:50:59 PM End Time: 1:01:15 PM
545.00 Gal 542.00 Gal Done
Tol
COLD WEATHER REQUIREMENTS (d ambient temperature is less than 35° F)
A ent temperatures are less than 35.F for three successive days.
Pour area t ed and heated for 24 hours prior to pouring.
Temperatures inside ted area continuously monitored on opposite end of tent from where heat is applied.
Ambient temperature within •ted area heated to above 50° F for a minimum of 12 hours prior to pouring.
Sufficient tenting/covering available to pletely cover and keep CLSM above 40e F
Pour area limited to 4800 ft2.
Record the temperature of each CLSM load prior to introd 'on into the cell.
Temperature of CLSM poured previous day (only might ambient < 35° F)
°F @ (time) for CLSM poured on
Daily Temperature Measurements (when pounng begins, every 2 dunng pour, and at the end of the day if ambient temperature is than 35' F)
°F @ (time)
°F @
°F @
°F @

°F @ time)

°F @ (time
(time)
(time) (time)
AL 44d7 DA QA AP OVAL DATE
ENERGYSOLUTIONS .CLSM Testing Form
CL-QC-PR-002-F11
Rev. 0

PROJECT: )6 CAW MW 1 1 e.(2) OTHER (specify) Mrh tr Lift ID: ample ID # Date: 7 / CI 117
iaWO It 1704222 ,r initial Screening r Load Acceptance 500 PSI Temperature only

Design Mix (5-0 CI-5°A Load # 116
Ambient Temp. °F Sample Temp. ?" °F Water added A44 gal. Ticket # &Nob
UNIT WEIGHT TEST (ASTM D6023)
Time of Measurement QC Tech.
ft3. Weight oU 91 71200 lbs.
lbs. CLSM WesiCIC) = Weight of Measure w/ CLSM (MC)
CLSM Unit Weight = [WC / V] =
Time Sample Taken
Volume of Measure (V)
lb/ft3.
lbs.
Time Sample Taken 112,6
FLOW CONSISTENCY TEST (ASTM D6103)
Start Time of Test 17 >1 QC Tech. P8.7
1st Measurement (F) 11.0 in. 2nd Measurement (S) I (- b in. Average [(F+S)/2] 1 I .0 in.
COMMENTS/EXPLANATIONS: +14 -AT> e,(A)r— Re.04-0-4-t .0)44-1N,
rps Ards -P4C-tetile-twei-Pg. /24> 1bs/i7 "ID iff/706 LF 12-
ner o u t
Clive, Utah
007
Page of
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev.- 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: I CAW L MW El 1 1 e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 5/5/2017
WEATHER: CI Fair LJ Cloudy r Warm LJ Rain Snow LJ Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: Waste Placement LJ Cell Excavation LJ Clay Liner LJ Radon Barrier
LJ Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: 0 Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: I Yes LJ No
LIFTS TESTED: N/A
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A
EXPLANATIONS: 111P
Class A West:
AWH12100107 (1st Tier); No OC activities.
(2nd Tier); QC observed the placement of shipment number 4519. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4520. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4519 and 4520.
QC performed a moisture determination test on the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. Ambient
temperature at the time of backfill placement was above 32.0°F. QC observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4519 and 4520
using the equipment and methods prescribed in the LLRW and 1le.(2) CQA/QC manual.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations place 9 ring(s).
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations move a caisson that was placed
on 4/06/17. This caisson was empty prior to re-placement.
Ile.(2):
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste.
No QC activities.
QC Technician (SIGN& DATE) ,s--49//
.0E.-11 QC APPROVAL DA E QA APPROVAL DATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page ( of /
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: I CAW a MW 0 1le.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 07/10/2017
WEATHER: 4 Fair Cloudy Warm Ll Rain Snow Ll Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: L Waste Placement Cell Excavation Ll Clay Liner Ll Radon Barrier
Ll Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: L Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: I Yes Ll No
LIFTS TESTED: N/A
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West;
AWH12100107 (1st Tier); No OC activities.
(2nd Tier); OC observed the placement of shipment number 4595. OC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the caisson.
OC observed the placement of shipment number 4596. OC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the caisson.
OC observed the placement of shipment number 4597. OC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
OC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4597.
OC performed a moisture determination test on the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. OC
observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4593, 4594, 4595, 4596 and 4597 using the equipment and methods prescribed in the
LLRW and 11 e.(2) COA/OC manual.
lle.(2);
No OC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No OC activities.
1d-167
7/00 QC Technician (SIGN & DATE)
QC APPROVAL D E QA APPROVAL DATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page s( of C
QC Technician (SIGN & DATE)
E • QA APPROVAL D13 • 9/17---- 2a., 1-2‘./8-- DATE
Ak-- l4/57f?
Energysolutions
Clive, Utah
/0-5.-17
Page ( of /
ENERGYSOLUTIONS'
CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: CAW a MW 1 1 I e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 08/29/2017
WEATHER: Fair Ll Cloudy Warm Ll Rain Ll Snow Ll Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: iì Waste Placement Ll Cell Excavation Ll Clay Liner Ll Radon Barrier
Ll Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1 Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: 1 Yes Ll No
LIFTS TESTED: AWG08170828BF-01
LIFTS APPROVED: AWG08170828BF-01 C P EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West:
AWR24170718: (1st Tier); QC observed the placement of shipment number 4674. OC verified that the liner was placed near the
center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4673. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
OC observed the placement of shipment number 4675. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations place 7 ring(s).
OC performed a moisture determination test on the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. QC
observed operations backfill shipment number(s)668. 4673. 4674 & 4675 using the equipment and methods prescribed in the LLRW
and lle.(2) COA/QC manual. iktoC40Y425. dtli.; Qc. 0 loSeeuces 0/..4.. b40.0 41 eAti 41C"' <AAA pe."4-1c /14...nta-g-reo
2/.046048), 2113 , log (4.• is) 1 27W/sato), 214z64-6), 4 2/6/04—c). Isi, 3/11,1(
11 e (2);
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No QC activities.
AWG08170828BF-01;OC observed compaction of the backfill cover layer placed over the lift area. No deficiencies were observed
during compaction. QC inspected grade poles following compaction and verified the sand layer to be placed and compacted to the
required thickness/elevation.
QC performed in-place moisture density testing on the backfill cover layer. The lift was approved
619 se.rve--1. e, pe-ra-A-s.e.) r•-S reu-a-bve. 1-‘-e- ri e-1.--) rten -4.12.-. sw?»......-i-
111..r(5) '4473, c14711, 4 4/4.15- ?r)c.r re. 12-4-1-0 nil - r 1 - - - ? ic. /y/ 17
QC APPROVAL
QC Technician (SIGN & DATE)
/y/ -
DATE QA APPROVAL DATE
0/17 Ir7
// 317
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: FI CAW L MW 11 e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 10/16/2017
WEATHER: ' Fair Cloudy L1 Warm Rain Ll Snow Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: Waste Placement L1 Cell Excavation LI Clay Liner L1 Radon Barrier
Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: 1 Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: i1 Yes L1 No
LIFTS TESTED: N/A < %.....
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A .0 ...1
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West.
AWR24170718; (1st Tier); QC observed the placement of shipment number 4746. QC verified that the liner was placed near the
center of the caisson.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4743. OC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4744. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4747. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6". OC observed the placement of shipment number 4745. QC
verified that the box was placed in accordance with the approved placement procedures.
QC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4743, 4744, and 4747 prior to backfilling.
QC performed a moisture determination test on the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. QC
observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4743, 4744, 4745, 4746, and 4747 using the equipment and methods prescribed in
the LLRW and 1 1 e.(2) CQA/QC manual.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations place 3 rings).
1 1 e.(2);
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No QC activities.
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page \ of

QC Technician (SIGN & DATE)
/2-7?•-•
DATE QA APPROVAL DATE
Page I of
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: 4 CAW @ MW 1 1 e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 11/20/2017
WEATHER: Fair LI Cloudy LI Warm LI Rain LI Snow Ll Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: ' Waste Placement Ll Cell Excavation LI Clay Liner LI Radon Barrier
LI Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: r Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: Yes LI No
LIFTS TESTED: N/A
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A opi
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West;
AWR24170718; (1st Tier); QC observed the placement of shipment number 4801. QC verified that the liner was placed near the
center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4800. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6". QC observed the placement of shipment number(s) 4797. QC
verified that the boxes were placed in accordance with the approved placement procedures.
QC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4800, & 4801 prior to backfilling.
QC performed a moisture determination test on the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. Ambient
temperature at the time of backfill placement was above 32.0°F. QC observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4800, & 4801
using the equipment and methods prescribed in the LLRW and 11e.(2) CQA/OC manual.
OC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations place 2 ring(s).
lle.(2);
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No QC activities.
QC PPROVAL
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah
„,.................................. CL-QC-PR-002-F15
ENERGYSOLUTIONS Rev. 0
CWF LIFT APPROVAL FORM
PROJECT: X CAW OTHER CWF
NW CORNER DATE: 8/29/2017
P I N 14263.21 E 11237.90 Lift Area = 22813 sq ft EW: 89 X 0.560 = 50
NS: 127 X 0.739 = 94
N 1435807 N 14356.50 E 11189 60 E 11279.08 N 1435493 P 2 N 14323.66 E 1 326.49
E 1136856 EW: 89 X 0.535 = 48
NS: 127 X 0.248 = 32
P2 0 P 3 N 14261.11 E 11300.36
EW: 89 X 0.254 = 23
C S: 127 X 0.746 = 95
P 4
EW:
P 1 0 NS: 0 P3 P 5
EW: .
)C = N 1423066 N 1422906 E 1118731 E 1127678 N 1422745 E 1136626 Page 2 attached: Y N
IDENTIFY LIFT CONFIGURATION ABOVE
LIFT ID: AWG08170828BF-01 NW CORNER: N 14358.07 E 11189.60 BASE LIFT ELEVATION: 4279.4
WASTE GENERATOR ID NUMBER(S): Information available in WITS
TOTAL ACTIVE PLACEMENT AREA SINCE LAST MOISTURE/DENSITY TEST: .151,1,k 2 2- , 613 .5,9 Al- Lito-s -11
NEW ACTIVE PLACEMENT AREA (including this lift): "Me 1-17 61'5 47 4-* A)t-- le•-• g.. 1-7
Loose 6” Sand Inspection Results (including initials/date): See Daily Construction Reports (CL-QC-PR-002-F2) for sand layer inspections
Container Placement Inspection Results (including initials/date): See Daily Construction Reports (CL-QC-PR-002-F2) for sand layer inspections
Moisture content testing for backfill performed each day of backfilling and meets requirements (attach results). Inspector: See DCR (CL-QC-PR-002-F2)
Backfilled Containers Inspection Results (including initials/date): See Daily Construction Reports (CL-QC-PR-002-F2) for sand layer inspections
Backfilled Inspection Results following Consolidation/Vibration (including ititials/date): N/A
Observation Results from Compaction of Intermediate Sand (insluding initials/date): N/A
INTERMEDIATE SAND THICKNESS: N/A BACKFILL COVER THICKNESS: 12" (min)
Observation Results from Compaction of Backfill Cover (including initials/date): N/A
DENSITY TEST ID NUMBER(S): 1, 2, 2 re-test, 3
COMMENTS:
This lift approval is for the backfill cover layer placed on the second tier of AWG08050822 lift area. Lift thickness was
verified by grade poles placed on a 50' x 50' grid with ribbons set at 12.0" above the intermediate sand layer.
TIME: 16/2
/0'3'17
OVAL TE A APPROVAL DATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page / of 6,
(signature)
CL-QC-PR-002-F5
Rev. 0 ENERGYSOLUTIONS FIELD DENSITY TEST
PROJECT: X CAW
LIFT IDENTIFICATION:
TEST ID NUMBER(S):
MW 1 1 e.(2)
AWG08170828BF-01
1 Lot 1
OTHER

DATE: 8/29/2017

TEST LOCATION: N 14263.21 E 11237.90 TEST METHOD: D1556 X D6938
ASTM D1556 (DENSITY DETERMINATION) ASTM D6938 (DENSITY DETERMINATION)
Make/Model Troxler 3430 Gauge Serial # 33080
Last Calibration Date: 7/19/17
Daily Standard Counts: Off-Cell Standard
Density 2160 Moisture 680
Method A (Direct Transmission)
Depth Setting 8 (inches) Count Time 1 (minutes)
Moisture Count 165 Density Count 1885
Wet Density (p„,) 111.7 (lbs/ft 3 ) Dry Density 99.8 (lbs/ft 3)
Moisture Density 11.9 (lbs/ft3 ) Moisture Fraction 12.0 (%)
sting Apparatus Calibrated Vol. (lbs/ft3)
ensity of sand (p I ) g/cm 3 lbs/ft 3
Sand to Fill Cone & Plate (M2)
bottle & cone before filling
cone, plate & hole cone after filling
cone, plate & hole Mas of sand to fill cone,
te, & hole (M
Mass of d to fill hole
Mass of wet soi ntainer
M f eat
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
ASTM D4643
Mass of container & wet specimen
(Mc.)
Mass of container & dry specimen
(Mcas.)
Mass of water (1
M. =Mc -M cds
Mass of container (Mc)
Mass of dry specimen (Ms)
Ms = Mcds M
Moisture content (w)
w = (M ), /Al x 100
512.4
469.3
43.1
232.0 _
237.3
18.2
Mass of wet soil
Test Hole Volu e

V= (Mt - M2)/P1 CM 3
Dry Mass of soil
M4 = 100 M 3/ (V+ /00)
Wet Denisty
p m =(M 3 /0x 62.43
Dry Denisty

=M4/V g/cm
Dry Unit Weight

7d=Pdx 62.43 lbs/fi 3
Soil Description: Brown Clay
Proctor ID: S32170410
Standard Proctor (ASTM D698)

Maximum Dry Density (7 dmax) 95.6 (lbs/ft3)

Optimum Moisture (w opt) 25.3 (%)
Required Moisture: N/A % to N/A %
Required Percent Compaction: 95.0 (%)

Container ID WaWa
Dry Density (p = (100 X p ,n)/(100 + w)
pd = ( 100 x 111.7 )/(100+ 18.2 = 94.5 lbs/ft 3
Note• Wet Densityfrom ASTM D 1556 (p,,) takes prem.:knee over ASTM D 6938 (p„)
Percent Compaction = pd / ydmax x 100
94.5 / 95.6 x 100 = 98.9
Comments:
Microwave oven power setting on HIGH. Initial time setting of 3
minutes and subsequent incremental drying periods of 1 minute until
a change of 0.1 % or less of the initial wet mass of the soil.
TEST RESULTS:
x Pass
Failed Moisture
Failed Compaction
By: Jeremy Hodges /
(print)
Date: 8/29/17
Time: 10:10
-014-

2.5:f
QA APPROVAL

DATE
Page 1,' of
QC APPRO
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah
ENERGYSOLUTIONS FIELD DENSITY TEST
8/29/2017
OTHER
DATE:
TEST ID NUMBER(S): 2 Lot 2
TEST METHOD: D1556 X D6938
Soil Description: Brown Clay
CL-QC-PR-002-F5
Rev. 0
TEST LOCATION: N 14323.66 E 11326.49
PROJECT: X CAW
LIFT IDENTIFICATION: AWG08170828BF-01
MW 1 1 e.(2)
Mass of container (Mc)
Mass of dry specimen (Ms)
Ms =Mcds
Moisture content (w)
w =(M /M s)x 100
493.0
441.3
51.7
228.0
213.3
24.2
Test Hole Volu e
V= (M 1 - M /
Dry Mass of soil
M 4 = 100 M 3 /(w+ 100)
Wet Denisty
pm =(M3 /0x62.43
Dry Denisty
DryPlia M n;Weighlit
7d =pdx 62.43
bs/ft 3
g/c
lbs/fi 3
Mass of container & wet specimen
(Mc.)
Mass of container & dry specimen
(Ma)
Mass of water (111 )
M. =Mc -M cds
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah
ASTM D1556 (DENSITY DETERMINATION)
sting Apparatus Calibrated Vol. (lbs/ft 3 )
Bul l ensity of sand (p ) g/cm 3 lbs/ft 3
Mass Sand to Fill Cone & Plate (M2)
Page ‘.3 of
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
ASTM D4643
Container ID AZ
Moisture Density 14.6 (lbs/ft 3) Moisture Fraction 15.2 (%)
ASTM D6938 (DENSITY DETERMINATION)
Make/Model Troxler 3430 Gauge Serial # 33080
Last Calibration Date: 7/19/17
Daily Standard Counts: OffiCe11 Standard
Density 2160 Moisture 680
Method A (Direct Transmission)
Depth Setting 8 (inches) Count Time 1 (minutes)
Moisture Count 198 Density Count 1926
Wet Density (p„) 110.7 (lbs/ft` 3 ) Dry Density 96.1 (lbs/ft 3 )
Dry Density (P = (100 p „)/(100 + w)
pd =(JOO x 110.7 )/ 000 + 24.2 = 89.1 lbs/fi3
Note: Wet Densityfrom ASTM D 1556 (N) takes presidence over ASTM D 6938 (p,„)
Percent Compaction = pa / yamax x 100
89.1 / 95.6 x loo = 93.2
Proctor ID: S32170410
Standard Proctor (ASTM D698)

Maximum Dry Density (7 amax) 95.6 (lbs/ft3)

Optimum Moisture (w opt) 25.3 (%)
Required Moisture: N/A % to N/A %
Required Percent Compaction: 95.0 (%)
Comments:
Microwave oven power setting on HIGH. Initial time setting of 3
minutes and subsequent incremental drying periods of 1 minute until
a change of 0.1 % or less of the initial wet mass of the soil.
QC APPR
TEST RESULTS:
Pass
Failed Moisture
X Failed Compaction
Date: 8/29/17
Time. 10:20
(signature)
q2S7 /7
DATE
By: Jerem Hod es
(print)
QA APPROVAL
17
Mass bottle & cone before filling
cone, plate & hole Mass of . •ftle & cone after filling
cone, plate & hole Ma of sand to fill cone,
e, & hole (M 1)
and to fill hole
ass of wet so & containejr
M. o ontain4
Mass of wet soi
N 14323.66 E 11326.49 X D6938 TEST METHOD: D1556 TEST LOCATION:
ASTM D1556 (DENSITY DETERMINATION) ASTM D6938 (DENSITY DETERMINATION)
1 (minutes)
Method A (Direct Transmission)
Depth Setting 8 (inches) Count Time
Slfi3
Soil Description: Brown Clay
Mass of container (M
Mass of dry specimen (Ms)
Ms =Mcds -Mc
Moisture content (w)
w =(M / M s) x 100
602.7
532.8
69.9
229.9
302.9
23.1
bottle & cone before filling
cone, plate & hole e & cone after filling
cone, plate & hole Ma of sand to fill cone,
ate, & hole (M I )
Mass o d to fill hole
Mass of wet so ntainer
Mass o ontain
Mass of wet soil
Test Hole Volu e
V= (M I -M2)/1)1
Dry Mass of soil
M4 = 100 M3/(N+ 100)
Wet Denisty
Prn =(M3 /0x 62.43
Dry Denisty
Pd =b14/V
Dry Unit Weight
7d = p d x 62.43
Density 2160 Moisture
Make/Model Troxler 3430 Gauge Serial #
Last Calibration Date: 7/19/17
Daily Standard Counts: Off-Cell Standard
sting Apparatus Calibrated Vol. (lbs/fi 3 )
ensity of sand (p g/cm 3
Sand to Fill Cone & Plate (M
lbs/fi 3
Mass of container & wet specimen
(M.)
Mass of container & dry specimen
cds)
Mass of water (M )
Mw= M cms - Mcds
Maximum Dry Density (7 dmax)
Optimum Moisture (v opt) 25.3 (%)
Required Moisture: N/A % to N/A %
Required Percent Compaction: 95.0 (%)
Comments:
Microwave oven power setting on HIGH. Initial time setting of 3
minutes and subsequent incremental drying periods of 1 minute until
a change of 0.1 % or less of the initial wet mass of the soil.
Q PROV Alnh
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah
TEST RESULTS: x Pass
Failed Moisture
Failed Compaction
By: Ryan Youngberg /
(print) ature)
MW I 1 e.(2)
AWG08170828BF-01
2A Lot 2
PROJECT: X CAW
LIFT IDENTIFICATION:
TEST ID NUMBER(S):
33080
680
Wet Density (p,,,) 112.5 (lbs/fi 3 ) Dry Density 98.4 (lbs/fi3)
Moisture Density 14.1 (lbs/fi 3 ) Moisture Fraction 14.3 (%)
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
ASTM D4643
Container ID TLT C111 3
g/c
lbs/fi 3
Proctor ID: S32170410
Standard Proctor (ASTM D698)
Dry Density (p =(100X p „,)/(100 + xt)
pd too x 112.5 )/ goo + 23.1 = 91.4 lbs/fi3
Note• Wet Density from ASTM D 1556 (p.) takes presidence over ASTM D 6938 (N)
Percent Compaction = pd / ydmax x 100
91.4 / 95.6 x loo = 95.6
95.6 (lbs/ft3)
OTHER
DATE: 8/29/2017
Moisture Count 192 Density Count
Date: 8/29/17
Time: 14:55
DATE
Page Li of
QA APPROVAL
1841
CL-QC-PR-002-F5
Rev. 0
ENERGYSOLUTIONS FIELD DENSITY TEST
Soil Description: Brown Clay
95.0 (%) Required Percent Compaction:
Mz2 QC APPROVAL
3 Lot 2 (Alt for P2)
PROJECT: X CAW
LIFT IDENTIFICATION:
TEST ID NUMBER(S):
N 14261.11 E 11300.36 D1556 X D6938 TEST LOCATION: TEST METHOD:
MW 11 e.(2)
AWG08170828BF-01
OTHER
DATE: 8/29/2017
ASTM D6938 (DENSITY DETERMINATION)
Make/Model Troxler 3430 Gauge Serial #
Last Calibration Date: 7/19/17
Daily Standard Counts: Off-Cell Standard
Method A (Direct Transmission)
Depth Setting 8 (inches) Count Time 1 (minutes)
Moisture Count 213 Density Count 1760
Wet Density (p.) 114.2 (lbs/ft 3 ) Dry Density 98.4 (lbs/ft 3 )
Moisture Density 15.8 (lbs/ft3 ) Moisture Fraction 16.0 (%)
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
ASTM D4643
Container ID MIA
557.9
499.7
58.2
228.7
271.0
21.5
Dry Density (p = (100 X p „,)/(100 + w)
pci =( ioo x 114.2 ) (100 + 21.5 = 94.0 lbs/ft 3
Note Wet Density from ASTM D 1556 (p.) lakes presrdence over ASTM D 6938 (p„)
Percent Compaction = pd / yam= x 100
94.0 / 95.6 x 100 98.3
ASTM D1556 (DENSITY DETERMINATION)
Test Hole Volu e
V = (M1 -M2)/P 1
Dry Mass of soil
M4 = 100 M3/(41 + 100)
Wet Denisty

p.=(M 3 Mx 62.43 /fi 3 Dry Denisty

PI MWerghVt
g/c
Dry

=pd x62.43 lbs/ft 3
Proctor ID: S32170410
Standard Proctor (ASTM D698)

Maximum Dry Density (7 amax) 95.6 (lbs/ft3)

Optimum Moisture (wopd 25.3 (%)
Required Moisture: N/A % to N/A %
0
Comments:
Microwave oven power setting on HIGH. Initial time setting of 3
minutes and subsequent incremental drying periods of 1 minute until
a change of 0.1 % or less of the initial wet mass of the soil.
TEST RESULTS:
X Pass Date: 8/29/17
Failed Moisture
Failed Compaction
Ryan Youngberg /
(print) ure)
By:
Time: 15:00
QA APPROVAL
33080
Mass of container & wet specimen
c.)
Mass of container & dry specimen
cds)
Mass of water (Al
M. =Mc -M cds
Mass of container (M
Mass of dry specimen (Ms)
Ms = M cds M c
Moisture content (w)
w = (Af„, / M5) x 100
Mass of
Mass of wet soi
M. s of
Mass of wet soil
d to fill hole
fietaine
t fi n?
CM 3
9-2s./7
DATE
Density 2160 Moisture 680
sting Apparatus Calibrated Vol. (lbs/fi 3 )
ensity of sand (p g/cm 3 lbs/ft 3
Sand to Fill Cone & Plate (M2)
)(one before filling
cone, plate & hole ttle & cone after filling
cone, plate & hole Ma of sand to fill cone,
e, & hole (M 1)
Mass of
CL-QC-PR-002-F5
Rev. 0
ENERGYSOLUTIONS FIELD DENSITY TEST
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah c 6 Page of
Work Order Name:
Operator Name
Site Name
Design
First Access.
Last Access'
GO8 BFC
8/14/17 10:09 AM
8/29/17 3:55 PM
EnergySolutions Clive_2015
Units: (US Survey Feet) Total Number of Points: 19
Total Time: 0:04:51 Points per Minute: 3.92
Sub Type Point Name Line Name Point Code Measured N Measured E Measured
Elv Point Topol SUR 14343.305 11203.432 4290.606 Point Topo2 SUR 14301.181 11202.675 4290.991 Point Topo3 SUR 14240.444 11197.853 4290.396 Point Topo4 SUR 14238.364 11243.495 4290.406
Point Topo5 SUR 14286.325 11244.843 4290.768 Point Topo6 SUR 14347.419 11246.108 4290.632 Point Topo7 SUR 14345.536 11292.749 4290.203 Point Topo8 SUR 14296.115 11288.969 4290.829 Point Topo9 SUR 14237.692 11286.486 4290.688 Point Topol0 SUR 14238.427 11329.004 4290.788
Point Topol 1 SUR 14292.659 11330.229 4290.955
Point Topol2 SUR 14344.645 11334.130 4290.282 Point Topo13 SUR 14334.911 11360.197 4290.313 Point Topo14 SUR 14286.784 11356.569 4290.607 Point Topo15 SUR 14242.095 11358.039 4290.843
Average Elevation = 4290.6
Intermediate Sand Elevation = 4289.3
Average Lift Thickness = 1.3
Con rol Point (CP-7) Northin Eastinu Elevation 15182.67 12678.78 4279.05 15182.69 12678.75 4279.07 -0.01 0.03 -0.02
Point Topo19 CP-7 15182.686 12678.747 4279.072
Precision Precision Precision
V Type 0.022 0.031 RTK Fixed 0.033 0.044 RTK Fixed 0.023 0.034 RTK Fixed 0.029 0.043 RTK Fixed
0.026 0.039 RTK Fixed
0.019 0.029 RTK Fixed
0.019 0.029 RTK Fixed
0.056 0.086 RTK Fixed
0.022 0.031 RTK Fixed
0.033 0.049 RTK Fixed 0.055 0.089 RTK Fixed 0.052 0.086 RTK Fixed 0.021 0.034 RTK Fixed
0.060 0.042 RTK Fixed
0.059 0.041 RTK Fixed
0.020 0.035 RTK Fixed
Control
Measured
Difference

Measured
Station
Measured
Offset
Antenna
Ht Local Time Date

8:55:39 AM
8:55:55 AM
8:56:18 AM
8:56:36 AM
8:56:50 AM
8:57:09 AM
8:57:24 AM
8:57:47 AM
8:58:06 AM
8:58:24 AM
8:58:41 AM
8:58:57 AM 8:59:21 AM
8:59:36 AM
8:59:51 AM
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017 8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
8/29/2017
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562 6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562 6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562 3:59:12 PM 8/29/2017
Company Name
Company address
City, State ZIP Code
Phone Number / Fax Number
Client:
Sort

AWG08 BFC survey good 8-29-17 Topo 8/29/2017
CL-QC-PR-002-F15
Rev. 0 • ENERGY SOLUTIONS
CWF LIFT APPROVAL FORM
PROJECT: X CAW OTHER CWF
NW CORNER DATE: 9/25/2017
P I N 14431.55 E 11722.33 Lift Area 3,786 ft = sq EW: 53 X 0.431 = 23
N 14495.55 N 14495 59 NS: 86 X 0.752 = 64
E 11699 80 E 11744 86 P 2
EW:
COPY
P 3
N 14463 46 EW: E 11699.33 NS: =
P 4
EW:
P10 NS:
N 14422 93 E 1174431 N 14422 96 ]) 5
E 11752.57 E . X =
N 14415 07 N 14409.91 S: X = E 11701.36 E 11752 66 'Page 2 attached: Y N
IDENTIFY LIFT CONFIGURATION ABOVE
LIFT ID: AW14121709251S-01 NW CORNER: N 14495.55 E 11699.80 BASE LIFT ELEVATION: 4267.2
WASTE GENERATOR ID NUMBER(S): lace4441-U0 etvoi'aist.A. gyt kil-Er5 SeaAttoolacitop
TOTAL ACTIVE PLACEMENT AREA SINCE LAST MOISTURE/DENSITY TEST: 3786 sq ft
NEW ACTIVE PLACEMENT AREA (including this lift): 3786 sq ft
Loose 6" Sand Inspection Results (including initials/date): See Daily Construction Reports (CL-QC-PR-002-F2) for sand layer inspections
Container Placement Inspection Results (including initials/date): See Daily Construction Reports (CL-QC-PR-002-F2) for sand layer inspections
Moisture content testing for backfill performed each day of backfilling and meets requirements (attach results). Inspector: See DCR (CL-QC-PR-00242)
Backfilled Containers Inspection Results (including initials/date): See Daily Construction Reports (CL-QC-PR-002-F2) for sand layer inspections
Backfilled Inspection Results following Consolidation/Vibration (including ititials/date): N/A
Observation Results from Compaction of Intermediate Sand (insluding initials/date): No deficiences observed
INTERMEDIATE SAND THICKNESS: 24" (min) BACKFILL COVER THICKNESS: N/A
Observation Results from Compaction of Backfill Cover (including initials/date):
DENSITY TEST ID NUMBER(S): 1
COMMENTS:
This lift approval is for the intermediate sand layer placed on the first tier of AWH12100107 lift area. Lift thickness was
verified by grade poles placed on a 50' x 50' grid with ribbons set at-9:5Labove the base elevation of the liners. A i1.3" fl-- 7/2441_1_
LIFT AP OV BY: DATE: 9/26/2017 TIME: 13:27
- -7 PPROVAL ATE QA APPROVAL DATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page ( of

9/26/2017
OTHER
DATE:
TEST METHOD: D1556 X D6938 N 14431.55 E 11722.33 TEST LOCATION:
MW Ile.(2)
AWH121709AS-01
PROJECT: X CAW
LIFT IDENTIFICATION:
TEST ID NUMBER(S): Id< plztipitril Lot 1
Mass wet soil (M3)
est Hole Volume
V = (M1 - M2)/P1
Dry Mass of soil
M4= 100 M 3 /(w+ 100)
Wet Denisty
p„,=(M3 /V)x62.43
Dry Denisty
P d = IM4 / V
Dry Unit Weight
7d = p d x 62.43
Soil Description: Brown Sand

Proctor ID: CWF Sand-170825
Standard Proctor (ASTM D698)
Maximum Dry Density (7 dmax) 113.8 (lbs/ft3)
Optimum Moisture (11' opt)
Required Moisture: N/A % to N/A %
14.2 (%)
lbs/ft 3
g/cm 3
lbs/fi 3
QC APPROVAL DATE QA APPROVAL
(print)
con efore filling
cone, plate & hole
Mass of bottle & cone after filling
cone, plate & hole
Mass of sand to fill con
plate, & hole ( )
Mass of sand to fi hole
Mass of wet soil & ntainer
CL-QC-PR-002-F5
Rev. 0
ENERGYSOLUTIONS FIELD DENSITY TEST
ASTM D6938 (DENSITY DETERMINATION) ASTM D1556 (DENSITY DETERMINATION)
Make/Model Troxler 3430 Gauge Serial 14
Last Calibration Date: 7/19/17
Daily Standard Counts: Off-Cell Standard
33080 Testing Apparatus Calibrated Vol. (lbs413 )
Bulk Density of sand (p g/cm 3 s/ft
Mass of Sand to Fill C e late (M

Density 2171 Moisture 682
Method A (Direct Transmission)
Depth Setting 8 (inches) Count Time
Density Count 1704
Wet Density (p„,) 116.3 (lbs/fi 3) Dry Density 111.8 (lbs/ft 3)
Mas • f container Moisture Density 4.4 (lbs413 ) Moisture Fraction 3.9 (%)
Mass of container & wet specimen
(Mc.)
Mass of container & dry specimen
(Mai
Mass of water (M ,„)
M =Mc - Md5
Mass of container (M
Mass of dry specimen (Ms)
Ms =M cds M c
Moisture content (w)
w = (M„,/M)x /00
472.8
460.1
12.7
227.2
232.9
5.5
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
ASTM D4643
Container ID JFK
Dry Density (p = (100 x p „,)/(100 + w)
pd = ( 100 x 116.3 )/aw + 5.5 = 110.3 lbs/ft 3
Nole Wel Density from ASTM D 1556 (p„,) lakes presldence over ASTM D 6938 (IN)
Percent Compaction = pd / ydmax x 100
110.3 / 113.8 x loo 96.9 Required Percent Compaction: 85.0 (%)
Comments:
Microwave oven power setting on HIGH. Initial time setting of 3
minutes and subsequent incremental drying periods of 1 minute until
a change of 0.1 % or less of the initial wet mass of the soil.
TEST RESULTS:
X Pass
Failed Moisture
Failed Compaction
By: R. Youngber /
Date: 9/26/17
Time: 13:32
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah
(sign lure)
//i-/./
DATE
Page 2 of 3
1 (minutes)
Moisture Count 72
Company Name
Company address
City, State ZIP Code
Phone Number / Fax Number
Client:
1:
Work Order Name: AWH12-01 1ST SAND
First Access: 9/26/17 11 .34 AM
Last Access- 9/26/17 12:15 PM
Operator Name
Site Name EnergySolutions Clive_2015
Design
Units: (US Survey Feet)
Total Number of Points: 13
Total Time: 0:03:32
Points per Minute: 3.68
to
Sort
Sub Type Point Name Line Name Point Code Measured Measured N Measured E Elv
Point Topol SUR 14494.193 11742.196 4279.463
Point Topo2 SUR 14494.820 11723.611 4278.451
Point Topo3 SUR 14494.758 11702.099 4278.534
Point Topo4 SUR 14463.558 11698.306 4278.872
Point Topo5 SUR 14462.193 11720.493 4279.210
Point Topo6 SUR 14461.513 11739.600 4279.500 Point Topo7 SUR 14432.951 11739.233 4278.989
Point Topo8 SUR 14433.194 11716.832 4279.125
Point Topo9 SUR 14432.190 11700.843 4279.063
Point Topol0 SUR 14416.820 11702.060 4278.780
Point Topoll SUR 14419.664 11720.600 4278.703
Point Topo12 SUR 14417 231 11741.438 4278.041
Average Elevation = 4278.9
Baseline Elevation = 4267.2
Lift Thickness = 11.7
Control Point (CP-7)
Northina Eastina Elevation
15182.67 12678.78 4279.05
15182.68 12678.75 4279.03
-0.01 0.03 0.03
Point Topo13 CP-7 15182.683 12678 747 4279.025
Precision Precision
V
Precision
Type
Measured
Station
Measured
Offset
Antenna
Ht Local Time Date
0.016
0.016
0 016
0.016
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.015
0.012
0.012
0.015
0.058
0.058
0.059
0.060
0.046
0.043
0.043
0.043
0.045
0.050
0.042
0.042
0.035
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
RTK Fixed
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
6.562
11:35:23 AM
11:35:38 AM
11:35:55 AM
11:36:12 AM
11:36:23 AM
11:36:41 AM
11:37:29 AM
11-37:39 AM
11:37:56 AM
11:38:13 AM
11:38:30 AM
11:38:50 AM
12:15:45 PM
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
9/26/2017
Control
Measured
Difference
AWH12-01 survey good.xlsm Topo 9/26/2017
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: i1 CAW 1 MW ' 1 1 e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 04/12/2018
WEATHER: I Fair Lj Cloudy LI Warm Lj Rain Snow Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: i1 Waste Placement Lj Cell Excavation LI Clay Liner Ll Radon Barrier
Ll Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: I Yes Ll No
C°PY LIFTS TESTED: N/A
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West;
AWR24170718; (1st Tier); QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6". QC observed the placement of
shipment number 4964. QC verified that the box was placed in accordance with the approved placement procedures.
QC verified that the sand stockpile was mixed and that no frozen material was present. QC performed a moisture determination test on
the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. Ambient temperature at the time of backfill placement was
above 32.0°F. QC observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4964, & 4948 (A & B) using the equipment and methods
prescribed in the LLRW and I1e.(2) CQA/QC manual.
1 1 e.(2);
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No QC activities.
QC Technician (SIGN & DAT
11201 / .Lf
QC APPRO A1. DA
(
QA APPROVAL
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page t of 1
DATE
iCs. QC A PROVAL D E QA APPROVAL DATE
QC Technician (SIGN & DATE) -- -
'----- ,
3 1211
------------."*. ,,
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
/ 1
CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: CAW MW ' 1 1 e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 03/01/2018
WEATHER: 1 Fair Ll Cloudy Ei Warm Ll Rain Snow Ll Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: .. Waste Placement Ll Cell Excavation Ll Clay Liner Ll Radon Barrier
Ll Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: Yes Ll No
COP LIFTS TESTED: N/A
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West;
AWR24170718; (1st Tier); QC observed the placement of shipment number 4910. QC verified that the liner was placed near the
center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4911. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4912. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4910, 4911, & 4912 prior to backfilling.
QC verified that the sand stockpile was mixed and that no frozen material was present. QC performed a moisture determination test on
the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. Ambient temperature at the time of backfill placement was
above 32.0°F. QC observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4910, 4911, & 4912 using the equipment and methods prescribed
in the LLRW and 11e.(2) CQA/QC manual.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations place 2 ring(s).
1 1 e (2)*
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No QC activities.
EnergySolutions
Clive, Uta h Page 1 of i
QC Technician (SIGN & DATE)
—11g11°— DA E QA APPROVAL
214
DATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page of
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: I CAW @ MW 1 1 e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 02/15/2018
WEATHER: Fair Ll Cloudy Ll Warm Ll Rain Ll Snow Ll Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: r Waste Placement Ll Cell Excavation Ll Clay Liner Ll Radon Barrier
Ll Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: i1 Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: Yes Ll No
LIFTS TESTED: N/A
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West;
AWR24170718; (1st Tier); QC observed the placement of shipment number 4897. QC verified that the liner was placed near the
center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4898. OC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4899. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4897, 4898, and 4899 prior to backfilling.
QC verified that the sand stockpile was mixed and that no frozen material was present. QC performed a moisture determination test on
the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. Ambient temperature at the time of backfill placement was
above 32.0°F. QC observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4897, 4898, and 4899 using the equipment and methods
prescribed in the LLRW and 11e.(2) CQA/QC manual.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations place 4 ring(s).
1 1 e (2).
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No OC activities.
QC Technician (SIGN & DATE)
Coarn- l -30-18
Q APPROVAL AT QA APPROVAL
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page of 2-
DATE
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: I CAW MW @ 1 1 e.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 01/29/2018
WEATHER: I Fair Ll Cloudy LJ Warm LJ Rain Snow Ll Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: Waste Placement LJ Cell Excavation LJ Clay Liner LJ Radon Barrier
Ll Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: @ Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: I Yes Ll No
LIFTS TESTED: N/A
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West;
AWR24170718; (1st Tier);
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4866. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
OC observed the placement of shipment number 4867. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4868. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4869. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4870. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4871. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4872. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4873. QC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4866, 4867, 4868, 4869, 4870, 4871, 4872 and 4873 prior to
backfilling.
QC verified that the sand stockpile was mixed and that no frozen material was present. QC performed a moisture determination test on
the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. Ambient temperature at the time of backfill placement was
below 32.0°F. QC performed a flow ability test on the sand used for backfill with passing results: (9.25", 9.00", and 9.00"). QC
observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4866, 4867, 4868, 4869, 4870, 4871, 4872 and 4873 using the equipment and
methods prescribed in the LLRW and 11e.(2) CQA/QC manual.
C4744,1„. I - 30 -11g QC Technician (SIGN & DATE)
-_,
/ /
DATE QA APPROVAL
r)/Af --QC APPROVAL ATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page L of L.
Mixed Waste:
No QC activities.
,...,............. , ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT (Continuation Sheet)
(2/vh QC Technician (SIGN & DAT
QC APPROVAL DATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page l of
ENERGYSOLUTIONS CL-QC-PR-002-F2
Rev. 0
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT
PROJECT: L CAW @ MW @ 1le.(2) OTHER Outside Support
DATE 12/1/2017
WEATHER: Fair Ll Cloudy Ll Warm Rain Snow LJ Wind OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS: i1 Waste Placement Ll Cell Excavation LJ Clay Liner Ll Radon Barrier
Ll Rock Placement OTHER
PERSONNEL ON SITE: Operations OTHER
DAILY PROGRESS MEETING: I Yes LJ No
LIFTS TESTED: N/A C 0 PY
LIFTS APPROVED: N/A
EXPLANATIONS:
Class A West;
AWR24170718; (1st Tier); QC observed the placement of shipment number 4804. QC verified that the liner was placed near the
center of the ring.
QC observed the placement of shipment number 4805. OC verified that the liner was placed near the center of the ring.
QC observed operations remove the metal ring from shipment number(s) 4804 & 4805 prior to backfilling.
QC performed a moisture determination test on the sand used for backfill. The moisture content was verified to be < 4.1%. Ambient
temperature at the time of backfill placement was above 32.0°F. QC observed operations backfill shipment number(s) 4804 & 4805
using the equipment and methods prescribed in the LLRW and 1le.(2) CQA/QC manual.
QC verified that the loose sand layer was placed to a minimum of 6" in depth and observed operations place 2 ring(s).
1 1 e.(2);
No QC activities.
Mixed Waste;
No QC activities.
Quality Control performed a waste offset inspection on the AWR24 and AWG03 cells. No waste was found within the waste offset
and the toe of waste (containers) is at least 10' from the toe of the berm. QC performed a debris fence inspection on the Class A West
embankment and found it to be satisfactory. Quality Control Personnel performed a monthly inspection on the Run-on and Runoff
berms in Class A West, 1le.(2) and Mixed Waste. QC found no deficiencies during the berm inspections.
QC inspected the exposed radon barrier and drainage ditches in 1le.(2) and erosion was found on the north slope. QC notified
operations of the deficiencies. Operations repaired the erosion to.o,oatisfactory condition. PI /tfra/7
re-Što.11-S
CL-QC-PR-001 -F20
ENERGYSOLUTIONS Revision 0
GENERATOR #
DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE 03,
Field Samples
F-D11
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
. SAMPLED
DATE OF
OVEN
DRY
BACK
CONTAINER
NUMBER
(railcar # or
bates #)
NAME
OF CAN
WT. OF
CAN,
W1 (g)
WT. OF
CAN + WET
SOIL,
W2 (g)
WT. OF
CAN + DRY
SOIL,
W3 (g)
W (%) =
(W2-W3) x 100
PERFORMED
BY
(initials) W3 - WI
2H -it L-1-111 c,„,,F 2._--L-J1 Z-2-ii c-,4F LALA 2.2-7.1 LN,(7.3 4140.1/41 Z.. g J-L
2.-5--ii 2--5--18 (A-I P• LAL-8 la.44 alv- 41`1.1 '419.7 2_, 7 zit_
iii W P- 7 lice- c.x,F.-- D40"- t'-- idct`ti (310 .-tiogi-1 r R 4 Pr 2./q/* 7 1//q- I C.A..›F-- 1;UL 5- Isis.5- (lig. 0 goir.3 z . to P-1-- ,02 /thy r ,P cac ikii 5 /141.tr _ry 3 336.s" .2 • CQ
• 14143 (3/i4i cLaF 3PV- 27.1. 1 No5:0 2.100..5- 2 . 11st Is ti 7- Icy 11 cA.., '11q 0 2.24.7- 3 tg.0 342.9 S .11 JK
K 22-7.1 ki 95-, 1 Li Q C0.4 2. ,4 Tc_
E/1.0/18 210/1% c-.J r- L-.A 42,1.2_ 349.7 3414.3 3.
zil-c7iis thiltg Cut P l-ALA- 2:17, /-• 407_4 427/17 62427//c. ,
lo
6,Je- ti,H,r Arfs- ,?7,2.,/ 367 Y. 0 .2. 3 woo olio cf Gii-4- 22-/./- 1-1* ?•2- 4/3/ 3 .2. ‘,/ 311,-/ne 27.,?/(P civic Z/r...ros--- Apr. s-- 3_3',..7.7 34/9/ 2. I 3 kh P 3 dk V/P (,. a r.t r Pry y - -`iF .6, .? -3 , 39.2. 1 . 2 .7
3/k/ ii 3/4 4.13 C.AdF- LA1,11 2.17, Z- 42_1;8 417. i2 2_, 2_
/ $ / / Sr" C clOc., 22 Ir. 2- 9 Sir . 2-. 4/i/9.3 0 19-r
2/9/ty 3/9 Gedie- Ox5* 4/ /26. (, 34 -/ 9 3417.3 .7. 9 17A4-
3/h2hp 3/42 iP Cidr Avis< el AM In , ,33P3 (3-7r• 2 3/1)11i )/13/18 c_vi F 3F K 2-4-7. k 900-1 %-10-5.3
3116/Pi 3114,11& c_x..,r- LI or) 2.2_8.2._.. 4114 401.4Q mo 1,.. 3/ibliy c.,-)c.- .)--k v2-7. 1 kiCK,c- 9 L2.. 8 " P 31__
3 ;It I L It iVra c.v./ r- SF K 2.1.71 I )96.2- , go. 3.1, a•c_ Lz 13 N22_11S cox 496 za...i1.2_ 4117 407. 5 , 5 J1- 2.( ig 3h2 MT Cu F CA. II 217, 1 340.7 34. Ye_ 1/2
/2.2-11b 342_11S (Air, 5P. ak, LA UTZ. 340.0 3 R. 1-1 3-( /2-3/Ig 3/E3/13 c.,,,c- LAI-A 2_27.2._ 571.t/ 3 4 C. 3E3/1,3 343/18 c.‘,JF 40D 21-8.2_ 341 . c Xv .1 4,7 D-c- 1„11.4/(f 31/.3((i Cm r- L41-A 2-2 2.2... 335.1 M. 1 3 .L,
/a co ff c•ri /v1/0 1/02..? 3 JO. St- :TO2•Q -5--: 3 .9iti,21_ 7/?(//f 3/02a / 17 CAlf ft Li 7 333 / 317.9 3.'7 14,,i
i
r ilif0
IS
LALiii -, - 2/.71, .iii,i
330,if ;g5-.0 1, 7
31q - X c v Yiiirile ii‘: /I E P-p- Tie- .sz7-7..8 rt7/1 4/ PJki7 VI
S. c1

5/ it t-1/s- 1S CA,/ F 3- r k z.z_7. 1 3 ‘77. L 3 5-1. V.-
GlIc / m 4/5- /a Cu r- go D 1-2A, 2_, 3 6 & .q 354, SG
IA/01 14 (51 tg c.,/ 1:- 3- FK 22-7.1 373,(/' 36 g . $
5.E
a c
‘1161it 'NI IS C-0):: LALIV 217.2 347.5- 3V. • I WW1% 4/IV'S FYT 1107 A011) 471.3 Sik13.4 44-4"' 4-'7_4 11.0 at
if ( .4 rtfiti: af/g* CCLI%f i4-4L4.44- - 4.2-3:11 -1/rf..1 1:49,1`t4"` S*P 9 11711q) ‘`111171 A '',t).)3? ad,pc tiii-2. 421 a. , I "2401 4 Z- A
Energy olutions
Clive, Utah o if= ak. 41, 0.11- (xi q.30.1g Page of

Sample Numbet BFS171027
Location: New CWF sand pile in Section 29.
Material Type: Soil x or Rock Sampled By N. Clarke
mple Num bet
Locaho
Material Type: Soil or Rock Sampled By
7/29./7
DATE
•
APPROVAL [1)/1C:A 7 QA APPROVAL
PROJECT: X CAW X MW X l 1 e.(2)
INDICATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF SAMPLE ON MAP
Tests to be performed:
Proctor Classification X Specific Gravity LA Abrasion Absorption
Gradation X NA Soundness Lab Permeability
Comments:Brown Sand
Tests to be perform
Proctor
:
Class' on Specific Gravity LA Abrasion Absorption
Gradation NA Soundness Lab Permeability
Comments:
Sample Numbet Material Type: Soi or Rock Sampled By
Location:
Tests to be performed:
Proctor Classification Specific Gravity LA Abrasion Absorption
Gradation NA Soundness Lab Permeability
Comments:
Sectima 29
Lirne F'" "° C7-,L:17'Vet:
Screened 150 CLSM Sand
Lime Fine Stockpile. 150 pei Lln—screened X = Sample locations
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
CL-QC-PR-002-F3
Rev. 0
SAMPLE LOG
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page 3 of 3
Date: 10/31/2017
0 100 50 20
COBBLES BOULDERS
10 0 1 0.01 0 05 0 02
SILT & CLAY Fine Fine Coarse Medium
SAND
D50 D30 D15 1 Cu Cc
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
U.S Srandard Sieve Opening in Inches
3" 2" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8"
CWF BACKFILL GRADATION
U.S Standard Sieve Number
4 6 8 10 14 16 20 30 40 50
—0-- Sample # BFS171027
Gradation Requirements
> 95% Passing #4 Sieve
> 35% Passing #30 Sieve
< 10% Passing #200 Sieve
Coarse
Sample # P200 D100 D90 D85 D70 D L BF5171027 !
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah
100 200
9
5
GRAVEL
100
90
80
70
co
60 4.3
o o z
40
30
20 •
10
0
1 0 5 drain Size in Millimeters 0.2
CLASSIFICATION / DESCRIPTION
2 Page 0 -- of
Pe
r
cen
t Fi
n
e
r

B
y

We
ig
ht

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
_____,...............
ENERGYSOLUTIONS
CL-QC-PR-002-F8
Rev. 0
SOIL CLASSIFICATI
PROJECT: X CAW X MW X lle.(2) Other
SAMPLE NAME: BFS171027 DATE: 10/31/2017
GRADATION AS RECEIVED AS TESTED MOISTURE DETERMINATION
SCREEN
SIZE
WEIGHT DRY
(g)
PERCENT
RETAINED
PERCENT
PASSING ASTM D2216 +#4 -#4
3" CONTAINER & WT.
AGGREGATE (g) 1340.6 N/A
1-1 / 2" CONTAINER &
DRY AGGREGATE 1285.9 N/A
1" CONTAINER
MASS (g) 108.5 N/A
3 / 4" ' PERCENT
MOISTURE 4.6% N/A
3 / 8" GRADATION TEST
#4 0.8 0 100 PERCENT GRAVEL N/A
-#4 524.0 100 PERCENT SAND 96
TOTAL
DRY MASS 524.8 100 PERCENT FINE
SAND N/A
#8 PERCENT SILT &
CLAY 4
#16 #200 SOIL SAMPLE PREPARATION
#30 48.8 9 91 Soak Time for #200
(rounded nearest 10 minutes) N/A
#40 Protective sieve used for
#200 sieve (#16 req_uired) Yes
#100 SOIL CLASSIFICATION RESULT
#200 455.2 87 4 CLASSIFICATION
-#200 20.0 3.8 Notes: Sieve set QC-1 was used. Sieves inspected for damage with
no damage found. Backfill Requirements: A minimum of 95%
TOTAL
MASS 524.0 100
passing #4 sieve, a minimum of 35% passing #30 sieve and less
than 10% passing #200 sieve. Material finer than the 75-µm (No.
200) sieve was performed in accordance with ASTM C 117
following Method A.
TEST RESULTS: PASS FAIL B • Date /6/7/%7
)/A0/
QC APPROV D QA APPROVAL DATE
EnergySolutions
Clive, Utah Page t of 3
kliOn
ltn01.1 14/1.41 11#1011 [141141 li•pr
FORr
NFORMATIC
L
ONLY
Ull
ArrilTarke
N.Clarke alleno
AS NOTED 77/22/151 11111111516-
1
2015 CWF (AWH1 5 4 3 2
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT TEST PAD
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
101) SCOPE: This work element applies to the
Class A West embankment.
102) NOTICE OF TEST PAD
CONSTRUCTION: The Containerized Waste
Facility Waste Placement Test Pad (CWF Test
Pad) plan shall be approved by the DWMRC. The
CWF Test Pad plan shall be provided to the
DWMRC at least 14 calendar days prior to test pad
construction. If DWMRC has not provided
approval or deficiency notification prior to the end
of 14 calendar days, construction may proceed as
proposed in the CWF Test Pad plan.
The DWMRC shall be notified 48 hours in
advance of the start-up of test pad construction.
103) CONTAINERIZED WASTE
PLACEMENT TEST PAD: A test pad with a
minimum area of 400 square feet will be
constructed using this procedure (container or
large component type, container configuration,
backfill material properties, placement and
compaction methods) proposed for construction of
the waste lifts. The test pad shall be representative
of anticipated field placement conditions and of
dimensions suitable to the equipment to be used
for production. The minimum area of the test pad
may be reduced with DWMRC concurrence with
the test pad plan.
Obtain documentation confirming that the CWF Test
Pad plan has been approved by the DWMRC or the 14
calendar day period has ended.
Obtain documentation confirming that the DWMRC
has been notified, as required.
Observe the construction of test pads. Measure test
pads to ensure that they are constructed to the size
indicated. Record the test pad size on the Daily
Construction Report.
Verify that the CWF Test Pad plan has been provided
to the DWMRC at least 14 calendar days prior to
construction of the test pad. Provide QC with
documentation of DWMRC approval or documentation
that the 14 calendar day period has expired.
Notify the DWMRC 48 hours in advance of test pad
construction. Provide QC with documentation of
DWMRC notification.
Daily, observe the construction of the test pads. The
quality assurance review for test pad specifications
shall cover each specification in this work element.
Review 100 percent of the QC documentation to verify
that the tests were performed and documented
correctly.
Prior to implementation of a containerized waste
configuration that has not been previously
approved; a waste placement test pad shall be
constructed utilizing the proposed containerized
waste configuration.
REVISION: 28b page 56 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and 1 le.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT TEST PAD
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
Test pads are to be constructed and tested in
accordance with the following specifications:
A Construct the proposed configuration of
containerized waste in the test pad area.
B At least one Proctor (or relative density) and
classification test shall be conducted on the
backfill material for each test pad.
C Backfill shall be placed over and between the
waste packages in a manner that encourages
flow into void spaces. The backfill is to be
placed and compacted by equipment and
methods proposed for use during construction
of the waste lifts. Other equivalent equipment
may be used for placement or compaction of
backfill with approval from the Engineering
Manager and DWMRC.
D The backfill surrounding the containers shall
achieve an average density of at least 85
percent standard proctor or 55 percent relative
density for drum configurations, or an average
density of at least 80-percent standard proctor
or 50 percent relative density around B-12 or
B-25 boxes, HICs, cask liners, large
components, or container overpack
configurations. The completed test pad shall
have no greater than one percent external void
space by volume of the entire test pad.
Document the constructed configuration of containers
in the test pad on the Daily Construction Report.
Conduct the required proctor (or relative density) and
classification (PL, LL, and gradation) tests.
Record type of equipment used, and number of passes
on the Daily Construction Report. Verify DWMRC
approval has been received for equivalent equipment
when used.
Conduct in-place moisture-density tests at a rate of at
least four tests per test pad. Each test location shall be
chosen to verify backfill compaction throughout the
test pad. Record the test result on the Field Density
Test form. Inspect the constructed test pad for void
spaces surrounding the containers. Observe destructive
testing of the test pad and measure external void spaces
found in the backfill in accordance with the
Containerized Waste Facility Waste Placement Test
Pad Destructive Testing method in Appendix B.
a. Approve test pads which meet the specified
compaction, and minimize void space conditions.
b. Rework and retest test pads not meeting the
specified moisture or compaction or minimize void
space conditions. Document all rework that was
performed.
Perform a minimum of one visual inspection of the
constructed configuration per test pad.
Review 100 percent of the QC documentation for the
test pad.
REVISION: 28b page 57 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT TEST PAD
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
c. Where rework and retesting is impractical, reject
the test pad procedure.
E. The procedures used to construct the test pad
(container type, container
configuration/orientation, backfill material
properties, placement and compaction
methods) shall be reviewed and approved by
the Engineering Manager. The test must be
approved by a Professional Engineer.
F. The test pad certification report shall be
approved by the DWMRC prior to using the
new test pad construction method. However, if
the DWMRC has not provided approval or
deficiency notification prior to the end of 14
calendar days from the time the certification
report was submitted, construction may
proceed using the new construction method.
Provide the Engineering Manager with copies of the
documentation for the test pad (all documentation
associated with this work element) for review and
approval.
Obtain documentation confirming that the test pad
certification report has been approved by the DWMRC
or the 14 calendar day period has ended.
Verify that the test pad certification report has been
provided to the DWMRC. Provide QC with
documentation of DWMRC approval or documentation
that the 14 calendar day period has expired.
REVISION: 28b page 58 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
104) SCOPE: This work element applies to the
Class A West embankment.
105) LIFT IDENTIFICATION: Each lift shall be
given a unique lift identification number for
testing and surveying purposes.
106) LIFT ACCEPTANCE: At the time of
acceptance, the date and time of lift approval shall
be recorded.
Assign a lift identification number to each lift. Use the
lift identification number to identify all paperwork for
that lift. Summarize all lifts on the lift summary form.
The QC technician shall record the date and time of lift
approval on the CWF Lift Approval Form.
The quality assurance review for waste placement
specifications shall cover each specification in this
work element. Review a minimum of 50 percent of the
QC documentation to verify that the tests were
performed and documented correctly.
107) DEFINITIONS: The following terms are
defined for the Containerized Waste Facility:
Backfill is defined as sand with a minimum of 95
percent passing the #4 sieve, a minimum of 35
percent passing the #30 sieve, and less than 10
percent passing the #200 sieve. The maximum
moisture content for backfill shall be less than or
equal to 4.1 percent at the time of backfill
placement. This specification may be modified
following successful completion of a test pad.
Backfill cover is defined as a minimum of one
foot of soil placed over containerized waste
packages after backfilling is complete. In the case
of caissons, standard liners, and large liners, the
backfill cover is placed over the intermediate sand
layer.
Containerized waste is defined as any containers
of Certified Containerized Waste in accordance
with applicable requirements of the Waste
Characterization Plan. Certified Containerized
Waste is defined as monolithic units in the form of
REVISION: 28b page 59 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
the following filled containers.
A. Any DOT "Strong, Tight" Containers up to
five feet tall;
B. Standard Liners are High Integrity Containers
(HICs) or other cylindrical packages up to
6.65 feet tall (up to 215 cubic feet external
volume);
C. Large Liners are HICs or other cylindrical
packages up to nine feet tall (up to 331 cubic
feet external volume); or
D. Other Large Components and oversized DOT
containers
Containerized Waste Facility (CWF) pyramid is
limited to a maximum of two lifts of containerized
waste. Containers up to five feet tall are limited to
a single lift at the pyramid base. Containers
greater than five feet tall are limited to two lifts.
The volume of the embankment above and
surrounding the pyramid shall be filled with bulk
waste lifts placed in accordance with the Bulk
Waste Placement Work Element of this plan.
Intermediate sand is defined as a minimum of two
feet of sand meeting gradation specifications for
backfill, placed above the top of caissons, standard
liners, and large liners.
Lift is defined as the six inch sand layer,
containerized waste packages, backfill between
packages, intermediate sand (when applicable),
and the backfill cover layer. A containerized waste
placement lift may contain one layer of containers
REVISION: 28b page 60 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and 1 le.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
or more than one stacked layer of containers,
depending on the container type and height.
Removable Steel Form is a circular steel form
used to ensure the spacing of standard or large
liners. Removable steel forms are placed in an
approved disposal configuration (hexagonal for
example) prior to placement of liners. Removable
steel forms can be used in either the first lift or
second lift in place of caissons. All removable
steel forms shall be pulled after liner placement
and before backfill.
108) CONTAINERIZED WASTE
PLACEMENT:
A. All containers shall be placed in accordance
with an approved container placement
method. Containers shall be placed in a
configuration that has been approved through
the successful completion of a CWF Test Pad.
Figures 7 and 8 illustrate approved waste
placement configurations. A minimum six-
inch layer of loose sand shall be placed prior
to placement of containers. Containers shall
be worked into this loose sand to minimize
any voids underneath the containers.
Containers shall be placed with a minimum
distance as specified by individual container
type below. Backfill shall be placed over and
between the containers in accordance with the
approved container placement method for the
type of container being placed. The
containerized waste placement backfill soil
properties shall be tested once per 2,500
square feet of placement area or once per lift.
Verify through observation and document that the
appropriate container placement method and spacing is
followed for the type of container stacking in each lift.
Perform at least one gradation test per 2,500 square
feet of placement area, or change in backfill material
type, or change in borrow source.
Conduct an inspection of the container placement
configuration prior to commencement of backfill
placement. This inspection shall document that an
approved configuration has been utilized for the
container types present.
Perform moisture content testing on backfill material at
least once each day backfill material is placed. Observe
placement and compaction of the backfill to ensure
that type of equipment, equipment load (if applicable),
and number of passes meet the specifications approved
by the containerized waste placement test pad. Record
type of equipment used, equipment load (if applicable),
Review the QC documentation to confirm that the
appropriate container placement and backfilling
method has been used and properly documented.
REVISION: 28b page 61 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
B. Standard Liners shall be placed as follows.
Spacing and backfill of standard liners may be
facilitated by the use of concrete caissons or
removable steel forms; use of caissons or
removable steel forms is not required.
Caissons or other forms shall not exceed
seven feet tall. When used, removable steel
forms shall be removed prior to backfill.
Caissons shall not be removed without prior
DWMRC notification. Backfill shall be
placed to a minimum height of seven feet
above the container base elevation by
dropping from the bucket of a front-end
loader or equivalent around and above the
container (whether in a caisson or not).
Backfill shall achieve a minimum density of
at least 80 percent of a standard Proctor, as
demonstrated by the approved test pad(s). The
backfill layer shall be covered by an
intermediate sand layer to a minimum depth
of nine feet above the container base
elevation. Intermediate sand shall achieve a
minimum density of 85 percent of a standard
Proctor. The backfill cover layer is then
placed above the intermediate sand layer.
Caissons shall be placed in a hexagonal or
other approved (through a test pad)
configuration, such as rectangular, that meets
the following criteria. Caissons with an outer
diameter of 100 inches shall be placed a
minimum of four inches apart. If no caisson is
used, or if a caisson or other form of smaller
outer diameter is used, the container shall be
placed as if the 100-inch diameter caisson
REVISION: 28b
and number of passes on the CWF Lift Approval
Form.
Verify through observation and document on the CWF
Lift Approval Form that standard liners are placed with
the appropriate container placement method and
spacing.
page 62 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
were there for spacing purposes; i.e., within a
minimum area of 108-inch diameter centered
around the container, no other caisson or
container shall intrude.
C. Unusually shaped containers shall be placed
and backfilled in a manner that allows void
spaces to be filled. In no case shall unusually
shaped containers be placed such that a
significant amount of external void space
cannot be filled. A significant amount of
extemal void space for unusually shaped
containers is five percent of the volume of the
unusually shaped containers in the lift, unless
otherwise approved by the DWMRC.
D. Large components and oversized DOT
containers shall be placed and backfilled such
that void spaces are filled and the bearing
capacity of the embankment is not exceeded.
E. Large Liners shall be placed as follows.
Spacing and backfill of large liners may be
facilitated by the use of concrete caissons or
removable steel forms; use of caissons or
removable steel forms is not required.
Caissons or other forms shall not exceed 9.5
feet tall. When used, removable steel forms
shall be removed prior to backfill. Caissons
shall not be removed without prior DWMRC
notification. Backfill shall be placed to a
minimum height of 9.5 feet above the
container base elevation by dropping from the
bucket of a front-end loader or equivalent
around and above the container (whether in a
caisson or not). Backfill shall achieve a
minimum density of at least 80 percent of a
Verify through observation and document that the
unusual containers are placed such that all significant
voids can be filled.
Verify through observation and document that the
large components and oversized DOT containers are
placed in accordance with an approved large
component placement method.
Verify through observation and document that large
liners are placed with an approved container placement
method and spacing.
REVISION: 28b page 63 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and Ile.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
standard Proctor, as demonstrated by the
approved test pad(s). The backfill layer shall
be covered by an intermediate sand layer to a
minimum depth of 11.5 feet above the
container base elevation. Intermediate sand
shall achieve a minimum density of at least 85
percent of a standard Proctor. The backfill
cover layer is then placed above the
intermediate sand layer. Caissons shall be
placed in a hexagonal or other approved
(through a test pad) configuration, such as
rectangular, that meets the following criteria.
Caissons with an outer diameter of 114 inches
shall be placed a minimum of five inches
apart and no more than 11 inches apart (at the
nearest point between two adjacent caissons).
If no caisson is used, or if a caisson or other
form of smaller outer diameter is used, the
container shall be placed as if the 114-inch
diameter caisson were there for spacing
purposes; i.e., within a minimum area of 124-
inch diameter centered around the container,
no other caisson or container shall intrude and
adjacent caissons shall be within a maximum
area of 136-inch diameter.
F. Large Liners shall meet the following void For large liners, document that the void space criteria
space criteria: void spaces within the waste is met.
and between the waste and its packaging shall
be reduced to the extent practicable, but in no
case shall less than 90 percent of the capacity
of the container be filled.
G. Drums shall be placed horizontally at least Document that drums have been placed as required.
one inch apart in a single layer. There shall be Document equipment used and number of passes on a
no continuous contact between drums. Daily Construction Report.
Forklifts may be used for drum placement
REVISION: 28b page 64 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
provided that protective measures are taken to
prevent damage to the drums. The forklift
tines shall not come into direct contact with
the drums. Sand shall be compacted to an
average standard proctor density of 85 percent
with a minimum of a single pass of a hoe
mounted vibratory compactor or its
equivalent, prior to placement of the next
layer of drums. For purposes of this
specification, the "Standard 1-13 Liner" and
"NUHIC-55 liners" may be placed as a drum.
H. When backfilling between standard or large
caissons placed in a hexagonal pattern, the
following controls apply as demonstrated in
the "Test Pad Report for the Containerized
Waste Facility Tri-Arc Test Pad Plan, Revised
Plan" dated September 18, 2007. The loader
or other equipment shall have a bucket of at
least 25 cubic foot capacity and the bucket
shall be totally filled. Dump the backfill sand
from a height of approximately two feet
above the top of the caisson (measured from
the lower lip of the bucket to the top of the
caisson).
I. If placing ion-exchange resins in containers
other than standard liners or large liners,
ensure that each 50' x 50' lift area contains no
more than 25 percent resins by volume.
Increase spacing of resin containers as needed
to maintain this criterion.
109) PYRAMID CONTROLS: Refer also to
Figures 7 and 8. Containerized Waste Facility
(CWF) Pyramid:
Document that the bucket used to place backfill sand
meets or exceeds the minimum capacity. Observe sand
dumping operations for compliance with the
specification. Document on the Daily Construction
Report.
Calculate the ratio of resins to other material (soil,
non-resin wastes) in the lift based on manifested resin
volume and actual lift dimensions. Nominal container
capacity may be used instead of manifested volume.
Resin volume divided by total volume x 100 = resin
percentage. Document on the CWF Lift Approval
Form.
Determine the location of the northwest corner and the
dimensions of each lift and document on the CWF Lift
Approval Form. Use the lift location and dimensions to
Verify compliance with this specification and proper
documentation of the QC requirements on the CWF
Lift Approval Form.
REVISION: 28b page 65 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Containerized waste lifts shall form a pyramid
with a maximum 3H:1V outside edge slope.
The slope shall be measured to the top of the
backfill cover above containers in the lift.
B. Drums and boxes less than five feet tall are
limited to a single lift on the lower layer of
the CWF pyramid. Standard and large liners
are limited to two lifts.
C. The pyramid base dimensions and maximum
3H:1V side slope requirements will control
the location of the second lift of containers.
D. Adjacent pyramids shall not be placed above
a previous CWF pyramid.
E. CLSM pyramids for bulk waste shall not be
placed above a previous CWF pyramid.
F. CLSM may be used for fill within the initial
lift of the container pyramid.
G. The first liner placed in a second lift using
this method shall be offset from liners in the
lower lift.
H. Large Liners placed in the upper lift of the
Containerized Waste Facility shall be placed
at least 75 feet from the outer perimeter of the
lower lift.
110) CLSM USE AS FILL: CLSM use as fill
within the initial lift of the container pyramid shall
comply with Specifications 84 and 85. However,
CLSM used as fill at the Containerized Waste
ensure compliance with this specification. As each lift
of backfill cover is placed, survey and document that
the corners of the lift meet the 3H:1V slope. If
applicable, document the dimensions of the previous
containerized waste facility lift on the CWF Lift
Approval Form. In locating a new pyramid, document
on the CWF Lift Approval Form:
a. The pyramid base is placed on the liner protective
cover; or
b. The pyramid base does not encroach the vertical
limits of a previous pyramid.
Prior to positioning the first liner in a second lift,
document the location of containers in the first lift.
Ensure that the first liner placed in the second lift is
offset so that it is not directly above any single liner in
the lower lift. Document that large liners placed in the
upper lift meet the setback criteria.
Obtain documentation of DWMRC notification and
Document CLSM mix inspections and approval in
accordance with Specifications 84 and 85.
Notify DWMRC at least 48 hours in advance of CLSM
use as fill. Provide QC with documentation of
DWMRC notification.
REVISION: 28b page 66 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and 11 e.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
Facility is not required to meet the compressive
strength requirement of Specification 86.
CLSM may be used for fill with up to two, five-
drum pallets stacked inside a standard or large
caisson. CLSM may also be used for fill with
other waste containers that fit inside a standard or
large caisson. The entire caisson height may be
filled in a single CLSM pour.
CLSM may also be used for fill around containers
less than five feet tall around the perimeter of the
CWF pyramid, so long as the 3H:1V pyramid
slope is maintained. Drums placed in this manner
may be oriented vertically.
111) INTERMEDIATE SAND: Intermediate
sand shall be placed above all caissons, standard
liners, and large liners. Intermediate sand shall be
placed a minimum of two feet above caissons. In
the case of liners placed without caissons,
intermediate sand shall be placed to an elevation
of at least nine feet above the base of the container
for standard liners and 11.5 feet above the base of
the container for large liners.
Verify the mean elevation of the top of each
intermediate sand lift by installing grade poles, or other
methods approved by the Engineering Manager. For
each lift larger than 50 feet x 50 feet, survey the
corners and at least one spot in the middle. For lifts
less than 50 feet x 50 feet, a minimum of four grade
poles, one in each direction, shall be used. Lifts larger
than 50 feet x 50 feet may be segmented to areas 50
feet x 50 feet or less and elevation verified with the use
of grade poles. The use of grade poles to verify the
compacted thickness of the intermediate sand material
shall be verified as part of the test pad for intermediate
sand. Thickness measurements of the compacted
intermediate sand will be documented and forwarded
to the Construction QC Supervisor.
a. Approve lifts with an average compacted
intermediate sand thickness greater than or equal to
the specified compacted intermediate sand
thickness.
b. Add intermediate sand and retest lots with an
average compacted intermediate sand lift thickness
REVISION: 28b page 67 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and 1 le.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
less than the specified compacted intermediate
sand lift thickness.
Intermediate sand shall achieve a density of at
least 85 percent of a standard Proctor.
112) BACKFILL COVER: After backfilling of
voids between containers is complete and
intermediate sand is placed (as needed), each lift
of containerized waste shall be covered by at least
one foot of compacted backfill cover material.
Perform at least one intermediate sand gradation and
proctor test per 3,000 cubic yards (compacted) and
anytime there is a change in material or borrow source.
Conduct in-place density tests at the surface of the
intermediate sand layer at a rate of one test per lot and
record the results on the Field Density Test form. A lot
is defined as 10,000 square feet of a single lift. The test
location shall be chosen on the basis of random
numbers (described in Specification 12). Approve lots
when:
a. Material is observed to be properly compacted
throughout the lot; and
b. Density tests performed meet compaction
specifications.
Verify the mean elevation of the top of each backfill
cover lift by installing grade poles, or other methods
approved by the Engineering Manager. For each lift
larger than 50 feet x 50 feet, survey the corners and at
least one spot in the middle. For lifts less than 50 feet x
50 feet, a minimum of four grade poles, one in each
direction, shall be used. Lifts larger than 50 feet x 50
feet may be segmented to areas 50 feet x 50 feet or less
and elevation verified with the use of grade poles. The
use of grade poles to verify the compacted thickness of
the backfill cover material shall be verified as part of
the test pad for backfill cover. Thickness
measurements of the compacted backfill cover will be
documented and forwarded to the Construction QC
Supervisor.
a. Approve lifts with an average compacted backfill
cover thickness greater than or equal to the
specified compacted backfill cover thickness.
b. Add backfill and retest lots with an average
Review the QC documentation.
REVISION: 28b page 68 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and 1 le.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
compacted backfill cover lift thickness less than
the specified compacted backfill cover lift
thickness.
Backfill cover for each lift shall achieve a density
of at least 95 percent of a standard Proctor.
113) SET BACK OF WASTE: Maintain a
distance of at least 10 feet between the inside toe
of the runoff berm and the outside toe of the waste
containers.
Perform at least one backfill cover proctor test per
3,000 cubic yards (compacted) and anytime there is a
change in material or borrow source. Conduct in-place
density tests at the surface of the backfill cover at a
rate of one test per lot and record the results on the
Field Density Test form. A lot is defined as 10,000
square feet of a single lift. At least two tests will be
performed per lift. The test location shall be chosen on
the basis of random numbers (described in
Specification 12). Approve lots when:
a. Material is observed to be properly compacted
throughout the lot; and
b. Density tests performed meet compaction
specifications.
Perform a laboratory classification test on the backfill
cover material at a rate of one test per 3,000 cubic
yards (compacted), or change in backfill cover material
type, or change in borrow source. The sample for this
test will be taken from the backfill cover stockpile.
Initial waste set back approval shall measure the
setback distance around the edge of the runoff berm at
100 foot intervals and place stakes for reference. The
stakes may be removed after the first lift is completed.
Record the inspection of the setback on the Daily
Construction Report.
Inspect the waste setback on a monthly basis. Record
findings on the Daily Construction Report.
Require removal of any waste necessary to maintain
the required set back.
Review the QC documentation to confirm that the
monthly inspections have been performed and properly
documented.
REVISION: 28b page 69 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017
LLRW and lle.(2) CQA/QC MANUAL
TABLE 1 - QA/QC ACTIVITIES
WORK ELEMENT — CONTAINERIZED WASTE FACILITY WASTE PLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL QUALITY ASSURANCE
114) SNOW REMOVAL: When waste material is
to be placed and the work area is covered with
snow, the snow must be removed.
115) COLD WEATHER PLACEMENT OF
FLOWABLE SAND BACKFILL: The
following requirements apply to placement of
flowable sand backfill when the ambient air
temperature is below 32 degrees °F:
A. Backfill with frozen clods shall not be
accepted for placement.
B. The backfill stockpile shall be worked using
heavy equipment prior to use.
C. The minimum average spread diameter for the
flowability tests shall be 8.75 inches.
Observe that snow is removed. Inspect the area for
damage. Notify the Project Manager of
deficiencies/damage and re-inspect after
deficiencies/damage are corrected. Construction may
not continue without corrective action. Record
corrective action (where required) in the Daily
Construction Report.
When the ambient air temperature falls below 32 °F:
a. Inspect the backfill stockpile to be used that day
for any visible frozen clods.
b. Observe working of the backfill stockpile.
c. Perform a flowability test (ASTM D6103) on
material from the backfill stockpile:
1) Collect a minimum of three representative
samples from the backfill stockpile.
2) Test each sample using ASTM D6103.
d. Record these actions and test results on the Daily
Construction Report.
Review the QC documentation to verify that snow
removal is being performed and documented and the
area has been inspected.
Review documentation and verify that the backfill
stockpile is inspected, worked, and tested during cold
weather conditions.
D. If backfill is observed to have frozen clods or
does not meet the flowability specification,
the backfill stockpile may be re-worked. Each
inspection and test shall be repeated for re-
worked material.
REVISION: 28b page 70 of 117 Date: August 18, 2017