DAQ-2024-004979

Small Source Registration

DAQE-EN161940001-24

{{$d1 }}

Bryan Delaney
Glanbia Nutritionals
227 West Monroe Street, Suite 5100
Chicago, IL 60606
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Delaney:

Re: Request for Evaluation of Compliance with Rule R307-401-9, UAC: Small Source Exemption
Project Fee Code: N161940001

On December 20, 2023, the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received your request for a small source
exemption for Glanbia Nutritional’s Foodarom Salt Lake City. The source is located at 5525 West 1730
South, Suite 202, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County. DAQ has determined the small source exemption
applies to the source, as long as the equipment and associated processes operate as specified in the
registration request.

The small source exemption does not exempt a source from complying with other applicable federal,
state, and local regulations and the current Utah Administrative Code. Based on the emissions that you
submitted to DAQ with your registration request, Glanbia Nutritional’s Foodarom Salt Lake City is not
required to obtain an approval order under R307-401. If you change your operation such that there is an
increase in emissions, we recommend that you notify us, as an approval order may be required.

As authorized by the Utah Legislature, the fee for issuing this small source exemption is a one-time filing
fee in addition to the actual time spent by the review engineer and all other staff on the project. Payment
should be sent to DAQ upon receipt of the invoice.
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

+ 2 / 6 Ü Ú Û Ù Û Ý
DAQE-EN161940001-24
Page 2
Thank you for registering your source with the DAQ. If you have any additional questions, please contact
John Persons at [phone] or [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Bryce C. Bird
Director

{{$s }}

Alan D. Humpherys, Manager
New Source Review Section

BCB:ADH:JP:jg

{{#d1=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy")}}
{{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}

Small Source Registration

DAQE-EN161940001-24

{{$d1 }}

Bryan Delaney
Glanbia Nutritionals
227 West Monroe Street, Suite 5100
Chicago, IL 60606
[e-mail]

Dear Mr. Delaney:

Re: Request for Evaluation of Compliance with Rule R307-401-9, UAC: Small Source Exemption
Project Fee Code: N161940001
On December 20, 2023, the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received your request for a small source exemption for Glanbia Nutritional’s Foodarom Salt Lake City. The source is located at 5525 West 1730 South, Suite 202, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County. DAQ has determined the small source exemption applies to the source, as long as the equipment and associated processes operate as specified in the registration request.

The small source exemption does not exempt a source from complying with other applicable federal,
state, and local regulations and the current Utah Administrative Code. Based on the emissions that you
submitted to DAQ with your registration request, Glanbia Nutritional’s Foodarom Salt Lake City is not
required to obtain an approval order under R307-401. If you change your operation such that there is an
increase in emissions, we recommend that you notify us, as an approval order may be required.

As authorized by the Utah Legislature, the fee for issuing this small source exemption is a one-time filing
fee in addition to the actual time spent by the review engineer and all other staff on the project. Payment
should be sent to DAQ upon receipt of the invoice.
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX
Governor

DEIDRE HENDERSON
Lieutenant Governor

Department of
Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Bryce C. Bird
Director

DAQE-EN161940001-24
Page 2
Thank you for registering your source with the DAQ. If you have any additional questions, please contact
John Persons at [phone] or [e-mail].

Sincerely,

Bryce C. Bird
Director

{{$s }}

Section Manager NSR, Manager
New Source Review Section

BCB:XXX:XX:jg

{{#d1=date1_es_:signer1:date:format(date, "mmmm d, yyyy")}} {{#s=Sig_es_:signer1:signature}}
TABLE 1 - EQUIPMENT SUMMARY
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
Source Number Description
1A 2.5 gallon liquid blending kettle
1B 5 gallon liquid blending kettle
1C 10 gallon liquid blending kettle
1D 15 gallon liquid blending kettle
1E 25 gallon liquid blending kettle
1F 50 gallon liquid blending kettle
1G 100 gallon liquid blending kettle
1H 500 gallon liquid blending kettle
1I 1000 gallon liquid blending kettle
1J 2000 gallon liquid blending kettle
1K 20 cubic foot (CF) dry blending
1L 30 CF Dry Blending
1M 50 CF Dry Blending
2 FSD-4.0 Fluidized Spray Dryer
Notes:
1. Dry blending is currently conducted in one of three blending areas, with one dry
blender in operation per blending area.
2. Liquid blending is conducted in ten kettles.
3. Certain mixes contain ethanol, and during certain points of the manufacturing
process (i.e., during transfers), limited emissions of volatile constituents are
generated and exhausted through general ventilation.
4. Emissions from the proposed fluidized spray dryer will be exhausted through a
dedicated stack.
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_11152023
T1 Equipment Details 2023
TABLE 2 - EXISTING BLENDING EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
CHEMICAL
ANNUAL TOTAL
VOLUME
TRANSFERED
(Pounds)
DESCRIPTION DENSITY
(lb/gal)
VAPOR
PRESSURE
(mmHg)
UNIVERSAL GAS
CONSTANT
(mmHg*ft3 /
lb-mol*K)
TEMPERATURE
(°K)
MOLECULAR
WEIGHT
(lb/lb-mol)
EMISSIONS
(lb)
Ethanol 260,000 Pouring to Blender 6.58 542.8 998.9 298.15 46.068 443.5
Ethanol 260,000 Pouring from
Blender 6.58 542.8 998.9 298.15 46.068 443.5
Ethanol 260,000 Loss from Blender
Headspace 6.58 542.8 998.9 298.15 46.068 221.8
ACTUAL VOC EMISSIONS (lb/yr):1,109
ACTUAL VOC EMISSIONS (tpy):0.55
ACTUAL HAP EMISSIONS (lb/yr):110.9
ACTUAL HAP EMISSIONS (tpy):0.06
POTENTIAL VOC EMISSIONS (tpy):1.66
POTENTIAL HAP EMISSIONS (tpy):0.17
NOTES:
1. Blenders are not vented during mixing. Therefore evaporative losses are limited to the transfer of raw material to the blender, when the blender is
opened and the gas in the head space escapes, and the transfer from the blender to the final product container.
2. Emissions estimates from transfers are calculated using EIIP Volume II, Section 3.1.1. Emissions are estimated by assuming that the air volume
displaced from the container during filling is at equilibrium liquid phase solvent which is 100% emitted.
3. Loss from headspace following blending when the blender of kettle is opened is based on a conservative estimate that the maximum liquid fill
volume is 50%, equilibrium between liquid and gaseous phase is established, gas phase solvent in the headspace is 100% emitted.
4. Vapor pressure was calculated in Table 4.
5. Certain products contain very limited amounts hazardous air pollutant (HAP) constituents. While these HAP constituent are likely less than 1
percent of the total volatile ingredients used annually, a very conservative estimate of 10% results in actual HAP emissions of 110 pounds annually,
less than the permitting threshold. Potential HAPs are estimated at 10% of potential VOC emissions.
6. The facility uses approximately 260,000 pounds of alcohol annually in both dry and liquid blends. Emissions estimates above include both liquid and
dry blending.
7. Potential emissions from blending were scaled up from actual emissions by a factor of 3 representing an increase from one shift per day to three.
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_11152023
T2 Blending 2023
TABLE 3 - SPRAY DRYER EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM ETHANOL
CONTENT
(%)
ETHANOL DENSITY
(lb/gal)
ACTUAL OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
ACTUAL ANNUAL
OPERATING DAYS
PROJECTED ANNUAL
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
PROJECTED ANNUAL
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED
PROJECTED ANNUAL
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 10%8.2 12 260 15,284 7.6 0.76
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM ETHANOL
CONTENT
(%)
ETHANOL DENSITY
(lb/gal)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
DAYS
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 10%8.2 18 365 32,185 16.1 1.61
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM HAP
CONTENT
(%)
LIQUID DENSITY
(lb/gal)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
DAYS
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED ACTUAL
EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 1.2%8.2 12 260 1,834 0.9 0.09
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM HAP
CONTENT
(%)
LIQUID DENSITY
(lb/gal)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
DAYS
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 1.2%8.2 18 365 3,862 1.9 0.19
ACTUAL VOC EMISSIONS
POTENTIAL VOC EMISSIONS
POTENTIAL HAP EMISSIONS
ACTUAL HAP EMISSIONS
NOTES:
1. Liquid Density is based on 10% alcohol @ 6.586 pounds per gallon with the balance comprised of water.
2. Actual emissions are based on a conservative estimate that all recipes contain the maximum alcohol content, 100% emissions of volatile constituents, maximum dryer
evaporation rate of 6 gallons per hour, and two operating shifts per day. (While a shift is 8 hours, actual spray time will be limited by time required to prepare the batch, set
up, and tear down the equipment. Actual spray time is estimated to be approximately 6 hours per 8 hour shift.)
3. Potential Emissions are based on a 24 hour per day operation (18 hours per day maximum spray time based on physical constraints), 365 days per year.
4. Potential HAP emissions are based on the maximum HAP content of 1.2% in proposed recipes. This is a very conservative estimate as the average HAP content is 0.3% of the
proposed recipes.
5. Controlled emissions are based on a 90% VOC control efficiency for the wet scrubber. Monitoring by Control Technique - Wet Scrubber For Gaseous Control | US EPA
gal=gallons; % is percent; lb is pound; yr is year; tpy is ton per year
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_11152023
T3 Spray Dryer 2023
TABLE 4 - VAPOR PRESSURE ESTIMATION
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
REF#
SOLVENT CAS P (mmHg)
Maximum Coating
Concentration
(%wt)
P (Pa)ln(P)=C1 +C2 ÷ T (k)+C3 *ln(T)+C4 *T^C5 VP Source
12 Ethanol 64-17-5 542.8 100%72,372 11.19 =73.304 +-7122.3 ÷ 343.15 +-7.1424 *5.84 +2.8853E-06 *117751.92 1
NOTES:
1. Equation and values from Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 9th Edition, Table 2-8 Vapor Pressure of Inorganic Organic Liquids
2. The temperature is the ambient operating temperature (70°C).
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_11152023
T4 Vapor pressure 2023
TABLE 5 - FACILITY-WIDE PTE
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
Liquid and Dry
Blending
Emissions (tpy)
Controlled Spray
Drying Emissions
(tpy)
Total Actual
Emissions (tpy)
0.55 0.76 1.32
0.06 0.09 0.15
Acetaldehyde 0.05 0.08 0.13
Acetophenone 0.002 0.003 0.004
Phenylacetaldehyde 0.004 0.006 0.010
Potential Liquid
and Dry Blending
Emissions (tpy)
Controlled Spray
Drying Emissions
(tpy)
Total Potential
Emissions (tpy)
1.66 1.61 3.27
0.17 0.19 0.36
Acetaldehyde 0.15 0.17 0.32
Acetophenone 0.005 0.006 0.01
Phenylacetaldehyde 0.011 0.013 0.02
0.00
0.006
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
VOC
Total HAP
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

H
A
P
s
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
VOC
Total HAP
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

H
A
P
s
NOTES:
1. Potential emissions for liquid blending are a projected increase of actual annual
emissions, scaled up on a 300% increase.
2. Potential emissions for spray drying are based on operating 24 hours per day (18 hours
per day maximum spray time based on physical constraints), 365 days per year.
3. Potential HAP emissions for spray drying are based on the maximum HAP content of
1.2% in proposed recipes. This is a very conservative estimate as the average HAP
content is 0.3% of the proposed recipes and spray drying is not proposed to occur on a
third shift.
4. Potential HAP emissions for liquid and dry blending are less than 1 percent of total
volatile ingredients used annually but estimated very conservatively at 10% of VOC
emissions.
5. tpy is ton per year
6. PM is negligible because dry blending occurs in an enclosed cell with no exterior
venting.
T5 Facility-Wide PTE
1/11/24, 1:13 PM State of Utah Mail - Glanbia Nutritionals / Foodarom USA, Salt Lake City - Small Source Exemption Submittal
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=6400efa1da&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785855982014666348&simpl=msg-f:1785855982014666348 1/2
John Persons <[e-mail]>
Glanbia Nutritionals / Foodarom USA, Salt Lake City - Small Source Exemption
Submittal
1 message
Lindsey Asbury <[e-mail]>Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:16 PM
To: John Persons <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Delaney, Bryan" <[e-mail]>, Paul Pepler <[e-mail]>, "Long, Luther"
<[e-mail]>
Hi John,

As previously discussed, please find attached the Small Source Exemption (SSE) Registration form, SSE Attachment C,
and emissions calculations, for Foodarom USA, Inc./ Glanbia Nutritionals facility located at 5525 West 1730 South, Suite
202, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Foodarom USA manufacturers food flavor products. Existing processes include dry material blending and liquid blending
operations. Historically, volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions have been less than one ton per year (tpy).
Foodarom is proposing to install a spray drying operation. Following the spray dryer installation, the actual (and potential)
VOC and HAP emissions are less than the small source exemption thresholds as summarized in the attached Tables and
qualify for the small source exemption based on your correspondence sent on November 21, 2023.

Foodarom respectfully requests coverage under the small source exemption based on post-control actual emissions less
than the small source exemption thresholds of 5 tpy per criteria pollutant, 500 lbs per year of individual HAP, or 2000 lbs
per year of any combination of HAPs.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,

Lindsey Asbury, PE
Brown and Caldwell
[e-mail]
T 858.571.6742 | C 956.579.9411
Professional Registration in CA

Compiled_GN_SLC_SSE_Registration - BD Signed.pdf
212K
1/11/24, 1:13 PM State of Utah Mail - Glanbia Nutritionals / Foodarom USA, Salt Lake City - Small Source Exemption Submittal
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=6400efa1da&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f:1785855982014666348&simpl=msg-f:1785855982014666348 2/2
Utah Division of Air Quality Revised: 6/21/06
SMALL SOURCE EXEMPTION REGISTRATION

Businesses eligible for this exemption shall not: 1) emit more than 5 tons per year of each of the
following pollutants: sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate
matter (PM10), ozone (O3), or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or 2) emit more than 500 pounds
per year of any single hazardous air pollutant (HAP), and emit more than 2000 pounds per year
for any combination of HAPs, or 3) emit less than 500 pounds per year of any air contaminant not
listed in (1)( or (2) above and less than 2000 pounds per year of any combination of air contaminants
not listed in (1) or (2) above.

Please keep copies of the registration notice and worksheets on site at your business to verify your
permit exemption status. Please be aware that the small source exemption only exempts your
business from the permitting requirements of R307-401-5 through 8 of the Utah Administrative Code,
not other applicable air quality regulations.

1. Business Name and Mailing Address:
____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
Phone # ( ____ ) ____-__________
Fax # ( ____ ) ____-__________
2. Business Contact for Air Quality Issues:
______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
Phone # ( ____ ) ____-___________
Fax # ( ____ ) ____-___________
3. Owners Name and Mailing Address:
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
Phone # ( ____ ) ____-__________
Fax # ( ____ ) ____-__________
4. Business Location (street address if
different from above and directions to site):
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
5. County where business is located:
______________________________
6. Start-up Date of Business:
Month: _____________ Year: _______

7. Briefly describe your process by describing end products, raw materials, and process
equipment used at your business. Attach additional sheets if necessary.

Foodarom USA, Inc. c/o Glanbia Business Bryan Delaney, Sr EHS Manager
4255 Meridian Parkway, Suite 151 [e-mail]
Aurora, IL 60504-4904
452 5238 331975 2604801
Glanbia Nutritionals
227 W Monroe Street, Suite 5100 Foodarom Salt Lake City
Chicago, IL 60606 5525 West 1730 South, Suite 202
Salt Lake City, Utah
Salt Lake June 2018
Dry powdered and liquid components are combined at the facility per proprietary recipe to manufacture food
and beverage flavorings. Powdered components are combined in 1 of 3 dry blenders (20 cf, 20, cf and 50 cf)
and liquid are blending in 10 kettles (capacities of 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 gallons.)
A fluidized spray dryer is planned for installation in Q2 2024 and emissions on this form include this equipment.
8. List any pollution control equipment:

9. Typical operating Schedule:
10. Annual Emission Rates:
Provide an estimate of the actual annual emissions of the following air contaminants from your
business. Emission calculation worksheets are available for some common processes.
Please attach all worksheets and calculations.
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)….. ______ lbs / year Particulate Matter (PM10) ….……... ______ lbs / year
Carbon Monoxide (CO) ______ lbs / year Ozone (O3) ……………………..…. ______ lbs / year
Nitrogen Oxides (Nox) ______ lbs / year Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)______ lbs / year
Other Air Contaminants ______ lbs / year Describe__________________________________
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS:
Complete Attachment C before selecting one of the following emission estimate ranges.
For an individual hazardous air pollutant:
0 - 250 lbs/year: ________ 250-350 lbs/year: __________ 350-500 lbs/year: _________
For a combination of hazardous air pollutants:
0-1000 lbs/year: ________ 1000-1500 lbs/year: __________ 1500-2000 lbs/year: _________

11. □ By checking this box, I hereby certify that the information and data submitted in this notice
fully describes this site and only this site and is true, accurate, and complete, based on
reasonable inquiry and to the best of my knowledge. I recognize that falsification of the
information and data submitted in this notice is a violation of R19-2-115, Utah
Administrative Code.

□ By checking this box, I understand that I am responsible for determining whether I remain
eligible for this exemption before making operational or process changes in the future and
agree to notify the Division of Air Quality when this business is no longer eligible for this
exemption.

Signature of Owner/Manager: __________________________________Title: __________________

Print Name: ____________________________ Phone # : (_____)___________ Date: ___________

Division Reviewer: _____________________________________________Date: ____________________
Small Source Applicable Yes___ No___ ____________________________________________________

A wet scrubber is planned to be installed with the fluidized spray
dryer
Monday - Friday, 12 hours/day
0 0
0 0
0 2640
X
X
4
Bryan Delaney Digitally signed by Bryan Delaney
Date: 2023.12.15 02:27:15 -06'00'Sr EHS Manager
Bryan Delaney 12/15/2023
4

Utah Division of Air Quality
Attachment C: Hazardous Air Pollutant List

Below is a list of the 187 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) that are regulated by the Clean Air
Act Amendments (CAA) of 1990. Please indicate which pollutants are emitted by your
business by checking the appropriate box(es) below. Provide an estimate of the expected
annual and potential to emit emissions of HAPs and record in Section IV, Air Emission
Information, of the Small Source Registration Notice.

† 75-07-0 Acetaldehyde
† 60-35-5 Acetamide
† 75-05-8 Acetonitrile
† 98-86-2 Acetophenone
† 53-96-3 2-Acetylaminofluorene
† 107-02-8 Acrolein
† 79-06-1 Acrylamide
† 79-10-7 Acrylic acid
† 107-13-1 Acrylonitrile
† 107-05-1 Allyl chloride
† 92-67-1 4-Aminobiphenyl
† 62-53-3 Aniline
† 90-04-0 o-Anisidine
† Varies Antimony Compounds
† Varies Arsenic Compounds (inorganic including
arsine)
† 1332-21-4 Asbestos

† 71-43-2 Benzene (including benzene from
gasoline)
† 92-87-5 Benzidine
† 98-07-7 Benzotrichloride
† 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride
† Varies Beryllium Compounds
† 92-52-4 Biphenyl
† 542-88-1 Bis(chloromethyl)ether
† 117-81-7 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
† 75-25-2 Bromoform
† 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene

† Varies Cadmium Compounds
† 156-62-7 Calcium cyanamide
† 133-06-2 Captan
† 63-25-2 Carbaryl
† 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide
† 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride
† 463-58-1 Carbonyl sulfide
† 120-80-9 Catechol
† 57-74-9 Chlordane
† 133-90-4 Chloramben
† 7782-50-5 Chlorine
† 79-11-8 Chloroacetic acid
† 532-27-4 2-Chloroacetophenone
† 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene
† 510-15-6 Chlorobenzilate
† 67-66-3 Chloroform
† 126-99-8 Chloroprene
† 107-30-2 Chloromethyl methyl ether
† Varies Chromium Compounds
† Varies Cobalt Compounds
† Varies Coke Oven Emissions
† 108-39-4 m-Cresol
† 95-48-7 o-Cresol
† 106-44-5 p-Cresol
† 1319-77-3 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture)
† 98-82-8 Cumene
Varies Cyanide Compounds

† 94-75-7 2,4-D (2,4Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid,
including salts and esters)
† 72-55-9 DDE (1, 1-Dichloro-2, 2-Bis(p-
Chlorophenyl) Ethylene)
† 334-88-3 Diazomethane
† 132-64-9 Dibenzofurans
† 96-12-8 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
† 84-74-2 Dibutylphthalate
† 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene(p)
† 91-94-1 3,3-Dichlorobenzidene
† 111-44-4 Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether)
† 542-75-6 1,3-Dichloropropene
† 62-73-7 Dichlorvos
† 111-42-2 Diethanolamine
† 121-69-7 N,N-Diethyl aniline (N,N-Dimethylaniline)
† 64-67-5 Diethyl sulfate
† 534-52-1 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts
† 51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol
† 121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
† 60-11-7 Dimethyl aminoazobenzene
† 79-44-7 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride
† 68-12-2 Dimethyl formamide
† 57-14-7 1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine
† 131-11-3 Dimethyl phthalate
† 77-78-1 Dimethyl sulfate
† 119-90-4 3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine
† 119-93-7 3,3',-Dimethyl benzidine
† 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide)
† 122-66-7 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine

† 106-89-8 Epichlorohydrin
(l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane)
† 106-88-7 1,2-Epoxybutane
† 140-88-5 Ethyl acrylate
† 100-41-4 Ethyl benzene
† 51-79-6 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane)
† 75-00-3 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane)
† 106-93-4 Ethylene dibromide (Dibromoethane)
† 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane)
† 107-21-1 Ethylene glycol
† 151-56-4 Ethylene imine (Aziridine)
† 75-21-8 Ethylene oxide
† 96-45-7 Ethylene thiourea
† 75-34-3 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-Dichloroethane)
4
4
† Varies Fine mineral fibers
† 50-00-0 Formaldehyde

† Varies Glycol ethers

† 76-44-8 Heptachlor
† 118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene
† 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene
† 77-47-4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
† 67-72-1 Hexachloroethane
† 822-06-0 Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate
† 680-31-9 Hexamethylphosphoramide
† 110-54-3 Hexane
† 302-01-2 Hydrazine
† 7647-01-0 Hydrochloric acid (Hydrogen chloride)
† 7664-39-3 Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid)
† 123-31-9 Hydroquinone

† 78-59-1 Isophorone

† Varies Lead Compounds
† 58-89-9 Lindane (all isomers)

† 108-31-6 Maleic anhydride
† Varies Manganese Compounds
† Varies Mercury Compounds
† 67-56-1 Methanol
† 72-43-5 Methoxychlor
† 74-83-9 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane)
† 74-87-3 Methyl chloride (Chloromethane)
† 71-55-6 Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane)
† 60-34-4 Methyl hydrazine
† 74-88-4 Methyl iodide (Iodomethane)
† 108-10-1 Methyl isobutyl ketone (Hexone)
† 624-83-9 Methyl isocyanate
† 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate
† 1634-04-4 Methyl tert butyl ether
† 101-14-4 4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloroaniline)
† 75-09-2 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)
† 101-68-8 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)
† 101-77-9 4,4,-Methylenedianiline

† 91-20-3 Naphthalene
† Varies Nickel Compounds
† 98-95-3 Nitrobenzene
† 100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol
† 79-46-9 2-Nitropropane
† 684-93-5 N-Nitroso-N-methylurea
† 59-89-2 N-Nitrosomorpholine
† 62-75-9 N-Nitrosodimethylamine
† 92-93-3 4-Nitrobiphenyl

† 56-38-2 Parathion
† 82-68-8 Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene)
† 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol
† 108-95-2 Phenol
† 106-50-3 p-Phenylenediamine
† 75-44-5 Phosgene
† 7803-51-2 Phosphine
† 7723-14-0 Phosphorus
† 85-44-9 Phthalic anhydride
† 1336-36-3 Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors)
† Varies Polycylic Organic Matter
† 1120-71-4 1,3-Propane sultone
† 57-57-8 beta-Propiolactone
† 123-38-6 Propionaldehyde
† 114-26-1 Propoxur (Baygon)
† 75-55-8 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine)
† 78-87-5 Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane)
† 75-56-9 Propylene oxide

† 91-22-5 Quinoline
† 106-51-4 Quinone

† Varies Radionuclides (including radon)

† Varies Selenium Compounds
† 96-09-3 Styrene oxide
† 100-42-5 Styrene

† 1746-01-6 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
† 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
† 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene)
† 7550-45-0 Titanium tetrachloride
† 108-88-3 Toluene
† 95-80-7 2,4-Toluene diamine
† 584-84-9 2,4-Toluene diisocyanate
† 95-53-4 o-Toluidine
† 8001-35-2 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene)
† 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
† 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
† 79-01-6 Trichloroethylene
† 95-95-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
† 88-06-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
† 121-44-8 Triethylamine
† 1582-09-8 Trifluralin
† 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane

† 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate
† 593-60-2 Vinyl bromide
† 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride
† 75-35-4 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene)

† 1330-20-7 Xylenes (isomers and mixture)
† 108-38-3 m-Xylenes
† 95-47-6 o-Xylenes
† 106-42-3 p-Xylenes

NOTE: For all listings above which
contain the word "compounds" and for
glycol ethers, the following applies:
Unless otherwise specified, these listings
are defined as including any unique
chemical substance that contains the
named chemical (i.e., antimony,
arsenic, etc.) as part of that chemical's
infrastructure. Polymers are excluded
from the glycol category.

August 2007
TABLE 1 - EQUIPMENT SUMMARY
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
Source Number Description
1A 2.5 gallon liquid blending kettle
1B 5 gallon liquid blending kettle
1C 10 gallon liquid blending kettle
1D 15 gallon liquid blending kettle
1E 25 gallon liquid blending kettle
1F 50 gallon liquid blending kettle
1G 100 gallon liquid blending kettle
1H 500 gallon liquid blending kettle
1I 1000 gallon liquid blending kettle
1J 2000 gallon liquid blending kettle
1K 20 cubic foot (CF) dry blending
1L 30 CF Dry Blending
1M 50 CF Dry Blending
2 FSD-4.0 Fluidized Spray Dryer
Notes:
1. Dry blending is currently conducted in one of three blending areas, with one dry
blender in operation per blending area.
2. Liquid blending is conducted in ten kettles.
3. Certain mixes contain ethanol, and during certain points of the manufacturing
process (i.e., during transfers), limited emissions of volatile constituents are
generated and exhausted through general ventilation.
4. Emissions from the proposed fluidized spray dryer will be exhausted through a
dedicated stack.
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_12082023
T1 Equipment Details 2023
TABLE 2 - EXISTING BLENDING EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
CHEMICAL
ANNUAL TOTAL
VOLUME
TRANSFERED
(Pounds)
DESCRIPTION DENSITY
(lb/gal)
VAPOR
PRESSURE
(mmHg)
UNIVERSAL GAS
CONSTANT
(mmHg*ft3 /
lb-mol*K)
TEMPERATURE
(°K)
MOLECULAR
WEIGHT
(lb/lb-mol)
EMISSIONS
(lb)
Ethanol 260,000 Pouring to Blender 6.58 542.8 998.9 298.15 46.068 443.5
Ethanol 260,000 Pouring from
Blender 6.58 542.8 998.9 298.15 46.068 443.5
Ethanol 260,000 Loss from Blender
Headspace 6.58 542.8 998.9 298.15 46.068 221.8
ACTUAL VOC EMISSIONS (lb/yr):1,109
ACTUAL VOC EMISSIONS (tpy):0.55
ACTUAL HAP EMISSIONS (lb/yr):110.9
ACTUAL HAP EMISSIONS (tpy):0.06
POTENTIAL VOC EMISSIONS (tpy):1.66
POTENTIAL HAP EMISSIONS (tpy):0.17
NOTES:
1. Blenders are not vented during mixing. Therefore evaporative losses are limited to the transfer of raw material to the blender, when the blender is
opened and the gas in the head space escapes, and the transfer from the blender to the final product container.
2. Emissions estimates from transfers are calculated using EIIP Volume II, Section 3.1.1. Emissions are estimated by assuming that the air volume
displaced from the container during filling is at equilibrium liquid phase solvent which is 100% emitted.
3. Loss from headspace following blending when the blender of kettle is opened is based on a conservative estimate that the maximum liquid fill
volume is 50%, equilibrium between liquid and gaseous phase is established, gas phase solvent in the headspace is 100% emitted.
4. Vapor pressure was calculated in Table 4.
5. Certain products contain very limited amounts hazardous air pollutant (HAP) constituents. While these HAP constituent are likely less than 1
percent of the total volatile ingredients used annually, a very conservative estimate of 10% results in actual HAP emissions of 110 pounds annually,
less than the permitting threshold. Potential HAPs are estimated at 10% of potential VOC emissions.
6. The facility uses approximately 260,000 pounds of alcohol annually in both dry and liquid blends. Emissions estimates above include both liquid and
dry blending.
7. Potential emissions from blending were scaled up from actual emissions by a factor of 3 representing an increase from one shift per day to three.
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_12082023
T2 Blending 2023
TABLE 3 - SPRAY DRYER EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM ETHANOL
CONTENT
(%)
ETHANOL DENSITY
(lb/gal)
ACTUAL OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
ACTUAL ANNUAL
OPERATING DAYS
PROJECTED ANNUAL
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
PROJECTED ANNUAL
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED
PROJECTED ANNUAL
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 10%8.2 12 260 15,284 7.6 0.76
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM ETHANOL
CONTENT
(%)
ETHANOL DENSITY
(lb/gal)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
DAYS
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 10%8.2 18 365 32,185 16.1 1.61
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM HAP
CONTENT
(%)
LIQUID DENSITY
(lb/gal)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
DAYS
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED ACTUAL
EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 1.2%8.2 12 260 1,834 0.9 0.09
DRYER EVAPORATION
CAPACITY
(gal/hr)
MAXIMUM HAP
CONTENT
(%)
LIQUID DENSITY
(lb/gal)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
HOURS
(hours / day)
MAXIMUM OPERATING
DAYS
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(lb/yr)
UNCONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
CONTROLLED
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
(tpy)
6 1.2%8.2 18 365 3,862 1.9 0.19
ACTUAL VOC EMISSIONS
POTENTIAL VOC EMISSIONS
POTENTIAL HAP EMISSIONS
ACTUAL HAP EMISSIONS
NOTES:
1. Liquid Density is based on 10% alcohol @ 6.586 pounds per gallon with the balance comprised of water.
2. Actual emissions are based on a conservative estimate that all recipes contain the maximum alcohol content, 100% emissions of volatile constituents, maximum dryer
evaporation rate of 6 gallons per hour, and two operating shifts per day. (While a shift is 8 hours, actual spray time will be limited by time required to prepare the batch, set
up, and tear down the equipment. Actual spray time is estimated to be approximately 6 hours per 8 hour shift.)
3. Potential Emissions are based on a 24 hour per day operation (18 hours per day maximum spray time based on physical constraints), 365 days per year.
4. Potential HAP emissions are based on the maximum HAP content of 1.2% in proposed recipes. This is a very conservative estimate as the average HAP content is 0.3% of the
proposed recipes.
5. Controlled emissions are based on a 90% VOC control efficiency for the wet scrubber. Monitoring by Control Technique - Wet Scrubber For Gaseous Control | US EPA
6. PM emissions from spray drying are estimate to be negligible because the spray dryer is equipped with a cyclone intended to capture particulate emission and return them to
the process as product. Any residual PM is captured by the wet scrubber.
gal=gallons; % is percent; lb is pound; yr is year; tpy is ton per year
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_12082023
T3 Spray Dryer 2023
TABLE 4 - VAPOR PRESSURE ESTIMATION
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
REF#
SOLVENT CAS P (mmHg)
Maximum Coating
Concentration
(%wt)
P (Pa)ln(P)=C1 +C2 ÷ T (k)+C3 *ln(T)+C4 *T^C5 VP Source
12 Ethanol 64-17-5 542.8 100%72,372 11.19 =73.304 +-7122.3 ÷ 343.15 +-7.1424 *5.84 +2.8853E-06 *117751.92 1
NOTES:
1. Equation and values from Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 9th Edition, Table 2-8 Vapor Pressure of Inorganic Organic Liquids
2. The temperature is the ambient operating temperature (70°C).
Appendix C_ Emissions Calculations_12082023
T4 Vapor pressure 2023
TABLE 5 - FACILITY-WIDE PTE
Glanbia - Foodarom
Salt Lake City, Utah
Liquid and Dry
Blending
Emissions (tpy)
Controlled Spray
Drying Emissions
(tpy)
Total Actual
Emissions (tpy)
0.55 0.76 1.32
0.06 0.09 0.15
Acetaldehyde 0.05 0.09 0.14
Acetophenone 0.002 0.003 0.005
Potential Liquid
and Dry Blending
Emissions (tpy)
Controlled Spray
Drying Emissions
(tpy)
Total Potential
Emissions (tpy)
1.66 1.61 3.27
0.17 0.19 0.36
Acetaldehyde 0.16 0.19 0.35
Acetophenone 0.005 0.006 0.01
0.00
0.000
ACTUAL EMISSIONS
VOC
Total HAP
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

H
A
P
s
POTENTIAL EMISSIONS
VOC
Total HAP
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

H
A
P
s
NOTES:
1. Potential emissions for liquid blending are a projected increase of actual annual
emissions, scaled up on a 300% increase.
2. Potential emissions for spray drying are based on operating 24 hours per day (18 hours
per day maximum spray time based on physical constraints), 365 days per year.
3. Potential HAP emissions for spray drying are based on the maximum HAP content of
1.2% in proposed recipes. This is a very conservative estimate as the average HAP
content is 0.3% of the proposed recipes and spray drying is not proposed to occur on a
third shift.
4. Potential HAP emissions for liquid and dry blending are less than 1 percent of total
volatile ingredients used annually but estimated very conservatively at 10% of VOC
emissions.
5. tpy is ton per year
6. PM emissions from spray drying are estimate to be negligible because the spray dryer is
equipped with a cyclone intended to capture particulate emission and return them to
the process as product. Any residual PM is captured by the wet scrubber.
7. PM emissions from dry blending are estimated to be negligible because dry blending
occurs in an enclosed cell with no exterior venting.
T5 Facility-Wide PTE