Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDAQ-2024-0073201 DAQC-263-24 Site ID: 16168 (B4) MEMORANDUM TO: STACK TEST FILE – CRUSOE ENERGY SYSTEMS INC. – Residue Booster Facility – Duchesne County THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist DATE: March 15, 2024 SUBJECT: Sources: Five (5) Waukesha 9394 GSI generator engines; SN’s: 1662663, 1651107, 1658720, 1662642, and 1662649 Location: Duchesne County, UT Contact: Kaitlin Meszaros: 631-245-0308. Tester: Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. Site ID #: 16168 Permit/AO #: DAQE-AN161680001-23 dated November 7, 2023 Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated March 14, 2024 On March 14, 2024, DAQ received the protocol for the testing of five (5) Waukesha 9394 GSI generator engines at Crusoe Energy Systems, Incorporated Residue Booster Facility in Duchesne County, UT. Testing will be performed during the week of April 15, 2024, to determine compliance with the emission limits found in Condition II.B.2 of Approval Order DAQE-AN161680001-23 and 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart JJJJ. PROTOCOL CONDITIONS: 1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK 2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK 3. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK 4. ASTM D6348-03 used to determine H2O content; NOx, CO, and VOC emissions: OK DEVIATIONS: None. CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: The methods proposed in the protocol are capable of determining compliance with the unit’s emission limits. It is recommended the pretest protocol be determined as acceptable. ATTACHMENTS: Crusoe Energy Systems’ pretest protocol and notice of testing date. 303 West 3rd Street ● Elk City, Oklahoma 73644 ● 580-225-0403 GAS Inc. www.gasinc.us March 14, 2024 Utah Department of Environmental Quality State Office Building – Air Quality Division 195 North 1950 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 RE: Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart JJJJ – Test NoWficaWon To Whom It May Concern, We are noWfying you of performance tesWng dates for 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart JJJJ on behalf of Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. Please see below for the informaWon perWnent to the tesWng. The tesWng will take place the week of April 15, 2024. Facility Unit # Serial # Loca1on Hash Facility 2026-09 1662663 Duchesne County, Utah Hash Facility 1457 1651107 Duchesne County, Utah Hash Facility 2026-06 1658720 Duchesne County, Utah Hash Facility 2026-07 1662642 Duchesne County, Utah Hash Facility 2026-08 1662649 Duchesne County, Utah Our tesWng protocol is included, for informaWon regarding our protocol or the performance test, you can contact me by email at mmcclellan@gasinc.us or by phone at 580-225-0403. For informaWon regarding engine or locaWon informaWon, please contact Kaitlin Meszaros by email at meszaros@pinyon-env.com or by phone at (631)-245-0308. Regards, Macie McClellan Client RelaWons Supervisor GAS Inc. Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. Performance Test Protocol 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart JJJJ Facility: Hash Facility State of Utah Prepared by 303 West 3rd StreetElk City, OK 73644 Type Annual Prepared on behalf of Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. Unit IDs 2026-09, 1457, 2026-06, 2026-07, 2026-08 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. 1.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 1.1 Contact Information………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 2.0 Test Information………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 3.0 Method Synopsis………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 4.0 Emission Point Information………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 4.1 Target Analytes………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 4.2 Test Quality Objectives………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 5.0 Quality Control Information………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 6.0 Additional Information and Reporting………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 7.0 Example Calculations………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 8.0 Health and Safety Concerns………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 1.1 Contact Information………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 2.0 Source Information and Testing Dates………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 2.1 Testing Limits and Parameters (Federal)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 2.2 Testing Limits and Parameters (State)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 2.3 Additional Parameters………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 4.2 Test Specific Target Analytes and Data Quality Objectives………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 5.0 QA/QC………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 5.1 Measurement System Capabilities………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 3.1 Sample Port Location………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 3.2 Sample locations inside the stack………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 9.0 Sampling Schematic Diagram………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 10.0 Engine Parameter Data Sheet Diagram………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 11.0 Velocity Field Data Diagram………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Table of Contents Table(s) Figure(s) Protocol Attachment(s) 3 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. 2.0 Test Information (continued) 1.0 Introduction Tests will consist of (3) 60 minute test runs. The test will be conducted using a multi component gas analyzer that incorporates a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. FTIR is state of the art technology. It is designed to military specifications and allows simple calibration using only single component calibration gases. 1.1 Contact Information 2.0 Test Information 1662649 Hash Facility Waukesha 9394 GSI 2500Day of 04/19/2024 1662642 Hash Facility Waukesha 9394 GSI 2500Day of 04/18/2024 Waukesha 9394 GSI 2500 Test Dates Day of 04/15/2024 mmcclellan@gasinc.us Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc.720-614-5598 Meszaros@pinyon-env.com Table 2.0 Test Information and Testing Dates GAS has been contracted by Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. to conduct source testing services at Hash Facility located in Duchesne County, Utah. The purpose of this test plan is to document the test methods and procedures that will be employed to collect and analyze exhaust gas emissions during performance testing of the internal combustion engines fueled by Natural Gas. Contact Macie McClellan Physical Address 303 W 3rd St. Elk City, OK 73644GAS580-225-0403 Table 1.1 Contact Information Kaitlin Meszaros Serial Number Location/Facility Name Make and Model Site Rated Horsepower Application Telephone Email Address Source ID 1662663 Hash Facility 2026-06 2026-07 2026-08 2026-09 1457 Day of 04/16/2024 1658720 Hash Facility Waukesha 9394 GSI 2500Day of 04/17/2024 1651107 Hash Facility Waukesha 9394 GSI 2500 4 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. g/hp-hr lb/hr TPY ppm @15% O2 g/hp-hr lb/hr TPY ppm @15% O2 g/hp-hr lb/hr TPY ppm @15% O2 1.00 2.00 0.70 1.00 2.00 0.70 1.00 2.00 0.70 1.00 2.00 0.70 1.00 2.00 0.70 g/hp-hr lb/hr TPY ppm @15% O2 g/hp-hr lb/hr TPY ppm @15% O2 g/hp-hr lb/hr TPY ppm @15% O2 0.15 0.30 0.03 0.15 0.30 0.03 0.15 0.30 0.03 0.15 0.30 0.03 0.15 0.30 0.03 3A D6348-03 1/1A % H2O Sample Location Inches (") CO2, H2O, NOx, CO, VOC, and CH2O will be measured using a Gasmet multigas FTIR analyzer in accordance with ASTM Method D6348 when applicable analytes are being tested for. Footnote Table 2.3 Additional Parameters Reduction % Reference Method 10/2 COOxygen (O2)%vd Moisture CH2O 320 Reduction % Table 2.4 Testing Limits and Parameters (Reduction) 2026-08 2026-09 1457 2026-06 2026-07 Source ID 2026-09 1457 2026-06 2026-07 2026-08 Table 2.2 Testing Limits and Parameters (State) Source ID NOx CO VOC (NMNEHC) Reference Method ASTM D6348-03 Reference Method ASTM D6348-03 Reference Method ASTM D6348-03 Reference Method ASTM D6348-03Reference Method ASTM D6348-03 Table 2.1 Testing Limits and Parameters (Federal) Reference Method ASTM D6348-03Source ID VOC (NMNEHC) 2026-09 1457 2026-06 NOx CO 2026-07 2026-08 5 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. 3.0 Method Synopsis EPA Method 1/1A Figure 3.2 The purpose of the method is to provide guidance for the selection of sampling ports and traverse points at which sampling for air pollutants will be performed pursuant to regulations set forth in this part. Method 1 may be modified as allowed in Subpart JJJJ & ZZZZ. Alternatively, for NOx, CO, VOC, O2, and moisture measurement, ducts ≤6 inches in diameter may be sampled at a single point located at the duct centroid and ducts >6 and ≤12 inches in diameter may be sampled at 3 traverse points located at 16.7, 50.0, and 83.3% of the measurement line ('3-point long line'). If the duct is >12 inches in diameter and the sampling port location meets the two and half-diameter criterion of Section 11.1.1 of Method 1 of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A, the duct may be sampled at '3-point long line'; otherwise, conduct the stratification testing and select sampling points according to Section 8.1.2 of Method 7E of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A." For all stacks greater than 6" in diameter, GAS will use a sampling port that is located at a minimum of 2 stack diameters downstream from any disturbance, and 1/2 stack diameter upstream from any disturbance. For all stacks greater than 6" in diameter, GAS will sample at 3 points within the stack. These points will be located at 83.3%, 50%, and 16.7% of the stack diameter. 1/2 diameter upstream 2 diameters downstream Figure 3.2. Sample locations inside the stack Actual diameter Figure 3.1. Sample Port Location 6 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. 4.1 Target Analytes 4.2 Test Quality Objectives Section 12.5 of this method will be utilized to determine the molecular weight of the stack on a wet basis. The formula found in Method 3 section 12.3 will be utilized to determine the molecular weight of the stack gas on a dry basis. CO Target Analytes Exhaust emission testing will be conducted for the following compounds: carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and oxygen (O2%). Table 4.2 summarizes the test quality objectives specific that will be used to evaluate test data to a known degree of accuracy. Compounds Table 4.2. Test Specific Target Analytes and Data Quality Objectives Infrared Analysis Expected Concentration Range Measurement System Achievable Minimum Detectable Concentrations Required Measurement System Accuracy and Precision for Test Application (cm-1) VOC as defined in 40 CFR Part 60 subpart JJJJ 2600-3200 0-100 ppm 0.9 ppm 1 ppm910-11502550-2950 *. Measured flue gas conditions at the sampling location including temperature, moisture content, and volumetric flow rate will be included in test results. Interfering Compounds CO2 926-1150 0-10%0%n/a Water Vapor 3200-3401 0-22%0.2%n/a 2700-2950 0-100 ppm 0.03 ppm 2 ppmNO2 EPA Method 2/2C EPA Method 3A This method is applicable for the determination of the average velocity and the volumetric flow rate of a gas stream. Method 2 will be used for stacks greater than 12 inches. Method 2C will be used for stacks with a diameter of 12 inches or less. This is a procedure for measuring oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in stationary source emissions using a continuous instrumental analyzer. Quality assurance and quality control requirements are included to assure that the tester collects data of known quality. Documentation to these specific requirements for equipment, supplies, sample collection and analysis, calculations, and data analysis will be included. NO 1875-2138 0-1000 ppm 0.20 ppm 2 ppm This extractive FTIR based field test method is used to quantify gas phase concentrations of multiple target analytes from stationary source effluent. Because an FTIR analyzer is potentially capable of analyzing hundreds of compounds, this test method is not analyte or source specific. The analytes’ detection levels, and data quality objectives are expected to change for any particular testing situation. It is the responsibility of the tester to define the target analytes, the associated detection limits for those analytes in the particular source effluent, and the required data quality objectives for each specific test program. Provisions are included in this test method that require the tester to determine critical sampling system and instrument operational parameters, and for the conduct of QA/QC procedures. Testers following this test method will generate data that will allow an independent observer to verify the valid collection, identification, and quantification of the subject target analytes. A heated sample line is used to collect the sample on a wet basis per ASTM D6348. Effluent Moisture content is determined to within a 2% accuracy using the FTIR analytical algorithm. 4.0 Emissions Point Information 4 ppm1 ppm0-1200 ppm2000-2200 7 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. Path Length Dilution Factor % Recovery 4.93 10 92 A1) A2) A3) A4) A5) A6) A7) Determination of System Performance Parameters - Noise Equivalent Absorbance, Line Position, Resolution, and Analyte Spiking Technique Required Pre-Test Procedures FTIR Reference Spectra Preparation of Analytical Quantification Algorithm Determination of FTIR Measurement System Minimum Detectable Concentration Test Plan Requirements All information required per ASTM D6348, Annexes 1-7 will be provided in the final report. This information shall cover: System Zero Nitrogen 65 Analyte Spike Recovery Propane 101.9 50 CTS Check entire system System Recovery (Spike) Data generated during the bench scale pre-test procedures will be presented in Table 5.1. Please note that Table 5.1 will be presented in the final report with data collected from the actual field-testing source. System Performance (3A/D6348)Determines minimum sampling time During bias check System Performance (3A)Within 3%During bias check System response time Drift System Performance (D6348)Less than 2 % of permit limit Pre test 5.0 Quality Control Information (continued) Mechanical Response Time Ethylene 101.2 42 System Response Time Propane 101.9 37 Table 5.1. Measurement System Capabilities Parameter Measured Gas Concentration Equilibration Time Path Length Ethylene 101.2 5.0 Quality Control Information The following is a list of the QA/QC procedures performed. It is listed as to the process and method it pertains to. Calibration sheets, calibration gases and any other testing equipment will be made available prior to the start of testing. Upon completion of the assembled sampling system, a leak check will be conducted under pressure or partial vacuum conditions to ensure the integrity of the sample collection system. QA/QC Element Traceability protocol Probe material Table 5.0 QA/QC Multiple Sample Points Simultaneously (1/1A)83.3%, 50%, 16.6% from stack walls All stacks under 6" Measurement from disturbances Distance from stack walls Heated line Manifold material Process or Element (Method)Acceptance Criteria Frequency Calibration Gas 2% Certainty Every Test Sample Extraction (1/1A)Pass system bias check Every test run System Performance (D6348) Verify line positions have not shifted by more than 15% of the resolution, and the resolution has not changed by more than 15% of that determined prior to testing. Post TestLine position System Performance (3A)Within 5%Before first test and after last Calibration System bias check System Performance (D6348)Within Tolerance Pre and post test System Zero CTS Check direct to analyzer System Performance (D6348)Within Tolerance Pre Test System Performance (D6348)Within 30% of effluent concentration Every test run System Performance (3A)Within 10% of the Sample collected Every test Stainless Steel Every Test Velocity Flow Measurement (2) Manometer is leveled and visual inspected Sample Point Selection (1/1A)1/2 stack diameter downstream and 2 stack diameters upstream.Every test Sample Extraction (3A/D6348)Sample kept above dew point at all times. Temp kept to 180°C at all times. Visible digital gauge Sample Extraction (1/1A) Every test run Manometer Manometer Velocity Flow Measurement (2) System is back purged after last sample. Another sample is taken and must be within 5% of the last sample Every test 8 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. * Elevation, Barometric pressure ("HG), Ambient temperature °F, Humidity %, Dew Point °F * Catalyst Inlet Temp °F, Catalyst Outlet Temp °F, Manifold Temp °F * Exhaust Gas Temp °C * RPM, Manifold Pressure ("HG) * Horsepower (BHP) and Fuel Flow Rate (dscfh) * Stack Diameter (") * Moisture Percentage * Volumetric Flow Rate * AFR setpoints and reading * Catalyst Manufacturer * Number of elements * Date of installation * Date of last reconditioning or cleaning 1. Exhaust Volumetric flow Rate Determination by EPA Method 2 Qsd=3600*(1-B(ws))*V(s)*A*(T(std)/T(s))*P(s)/P(std) V(s)= Absolute Stack Gas Velocity A= Cross Sectional Area of Stack T(std)= Standard Absolute Temperature T(s)= Absolute Stack Temperature P(s)= Absolute Stack Pressure P(std)= Standard Absolute Pressure (When Method 2 is used) K=Pitot tube velocity Constant (85.49) C=Velocity Pressure Coefficient √ΔP= Square Root of differential Pressure of stack gas (inH2O) T(s(avg))= Average Stack temp °R M=Molecular Weight of stack gas, wet basis P= Absolute stack gas Pressure (LB/HR)*454 Engine Horsepower (LB/HR)*24(HRS/DAY)*365(Days/YR) 2000(LB/TON) 3. Mass Emission Rates (TPY) TPY = g/hp-hr = lb/hr = K*C*√(ΔP)*√(T(s(avg))+460)/√(M*P)V(s)= 6.0 Additional Information and Reporting Additional parameters and atmospheric information will also be provided in the final report and will include: The final report will contain all field test data including all pre and post calibration information. Final concentrations will be reported in the permitted units of measure. 7.0 Example Calculations 2. Absolute Stack Gas Velocity V(s) 3. Mass Emission Rates (LBS./HR.) ((Mol Wgt)*(Qd dscfh)*(concentration (385*106) 3. Mass Emission Rates (G./HP.-HR.) 9 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. * Hardhat * Steel-Toed Boots * Safety Glasses * Hearing Protection * Fire-Retardant Clothing * 4 - Safety Gloves * 4 Gas Monitor * * * * * * * * * 8.0 Health and Safety Concerns In accordance with 40 CFR Part 60.8, the client must provide safe access to the unit for testing and observance. Due to the nature of the source and the exposure to high temperatures, extreme caution will be observed in order to avoid contact with the unit which may result in burns and or inhalation of exhaust emissions. GAS personnel will sign in and out at all facilities, as well as undergo site specific safety training. Probe: Heated probe assembly required by ASTM D6348. Heated Line: Used for "Hot/Wet" sample to keep line above any dew point that would cause moisture to drop out. PSS: Allows precise heating of the sampling system. Breakdown Of Schematic Diagram: O2 Sensor: Zirconium Dioxide sensor to measure Oxygen per method 3A. Gasmet FTIR: FTIR Analyzer for use with ASTM D6348 Flow Meter: Allows proper measurement of flow. Data: Data acquisition system that allows for the acquisition of the infrared data, Oxygen data and analysis of the resulting spectra. Gas: Required calibration gases per ASTM D6348 and Method 3A. Control Panel: Allows the control of flow throughout the system as required by ASTM D6348 and Method 3A. Allows for introduction of calibration standards into the sampling system at the probe outlet, upstream of the primary particulate filter. Due to the remote location of the source unit, additional health & safety precautions will be observed such as avoidance of slips, trips, falls, and heat exhaustion. Figure 9.0 Sampling Schematic Diagram Figure 9.0 Schematic Diagram In addition, GAS will use the following safety equipment: ! 10 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. **Note: Actual note parameters may differ due to the availability of such parameters at specific locations. Attachment 11.0 Velocity Field Data Attachment 10.0 Engine Parameter Data Sheet Diagram 1/53 Great Plains Analytical Services, Inc. 10.0 Engine Parameter Data Sheet Company Facility Date Elevation (ft) Unit ID Make Model Serial Number Technician Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Time:9:06 AM 10:17 AM 11:28 AM N/A Engine Speed (RPM)1601 1600 1603 1601 Engine Hours 10568 10569 10570 10571 Catalyst (Yes or No)Yes Yes Yes Yes Catalyst Manufacturer Murphy Murphy Murphy Murphy # of Catalyst installed 1 1 1 1 Catalyst Element Installation date 7/22/16 7/22/16 7/22/16 7/22/16 Catalyst Inlet Temp °F 847 845 846 846 Catalyst Outlet Temp °F 878 879 780 846 Catalyst Pressure Drop H2O 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Catalyst reconditioning or cleaning date New New New New AFR Manufacturer/Type Murphy Murphy Murphy Murphy AFR Setting (Targets Right Bank)17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 AFR Readings NA NA NA NA Intake Manifold Pressure (psi)4.40 4.50 4.50 4.47 Ambient Temp °F 76.00 79.00 83.00 79.33 Exhaust Gas Temp °F (From Probe)785.00 784.00 783.00 784.00 Intake Manifold Temp °F 85.00 85.00 85.00 85.00 Barometric Press ("HG)30.13 30.13 30.11 30.12 Fuel Flow Rate (dscf)587.00 586.63 587.73 587.12 Engine Load (BHP)72.05 72.00 72.14 72.06 Cottonwood 08E Cummins 4,724 Whiting Oil & Gas Company 7/26/2016 73697207 ENG-01 5.9 Noel Arnim