Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDDW-2024-007940 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830 Telephone (801) 536-4200 • Fax (801) 536-4211 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4284 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER Nathan Lunstad, P.E. Director SPENCER J. COX Governor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieutenant Governor January 19, 2024 Pole Patch Water Tyson Jackson, Administrative Contact 3335 N. 250 W. North Ogden, UT 84414 Subject: Administrative Order: “Not Approved” Rating Determination for Pole Patch Landowners Association, Inc. Water System UTAH29107 Dear Tyson Jackson: Compliance with the standards and regulations for drinking water is critical to ensure safe, reliable drinking water and to protect public health. The Pole Patch Landowners Association, Inc. is in significant non- compliance with its obligations under the Utah Safe Drinking Water Act and the Utah Drinking Water Rules as well as the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Therefore, the Division of Drinking Water must downgrade the rating of the Pole Patch Landowners Association Inc. water system to “Not Approved” status in accordance with the Utah Drinking Water Rules. Enclosed is the Administrative Order: “Not Approved” Rating Determination. I encourage you to contact me or my staff and to take the steps necessary to return to compliance as soon as possible. Sincerely, Nathan Lunstad, P.E. Director, Division of Drinking Water cc: Tyson Jackson, Pole Patch Water System, tysonjack005@gmail.com Scott Braeden, Weber-Morgan Health Department, sbraeden@co.weber.ut.us Cameron Draney, Division of Drinking Water, cdraney@utah.gov Hunter Payne, Division of Drinking Water, hnpayne@utah.gov Christopher Brown, Environmental Protection Agency -Region 8, brown.Christopher.t@epa.gov Melissa Noble, Division of Drinking Water, mnoble@utah.gov Bret F. Randall, Assistant Attorney General, bfrandall@agutah.gov -or Elizabeth A. Burns, Assistant Attorney General, elizabethburns@agutah.gov Kim Shelley, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, kshelley@utah.gov EQDWMonitoring, EQDWCOA, and EQDWFS 1 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER In the Matter of: Pole Patch Water System ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: “NOT APPROVED” RATING DETERMINATION Docket No. UTAH29107-2024-1 This ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: “NOT APPROVED” RATING DETERMINATION (“Order”), relating to the Pole Patch Water System (the “System”), has been issued by the Director of the Utah Division of Drinking Water (“Director”) based on the authorities and findings provided herein. Notice of this Order is being provided to Pole Patch Landowners Association Inc., a Utah non-profit corporation, as the “Supplier” legally responsible for the System. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY AUTHORITY 1. In 1974, Congress enacted the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq., as amended. 42 U.S.C. § 300g-2 allows states to achieve primary enforcement responsibility after the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has determined that the state has adopted and can implement a state program that is no less stringent than the federal public drinking water program (“Primacy”). 2. The Utah legislature has enacted the Utah Safe Drinking Water Act, codified at Utah Code § 19-4- 101, with the intent of achieving Primacy. 3. Utah Code § 19-4-104 authorizes the Utah Drinking Water Board (the “Board”), among other things, to make rules regulating public water systems in the state of Utah. Utah Code § 19 -4- 104(1)(c)(vi) charges the Board to “meet the requirements of federal law related or pertaining to drinking water.” The Board has promulgated the Utah Public Drinking Water Rules, codified at Utah Administrative Code (“UAC”) R309. 4. In 1980, the EPA Administrator determined, in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 142.11, that the Utah public drinking water program met the federal requirements for Primacy. See 45 Fed. Reg. 6647 (January 29, 1980). In accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 142.17, the EPA Administrator has reviewed, and continues to review annually, the Utah public drinking water program to evaluate its continuing compliance with the requirements set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 142. 5. The Board has defined public water systems under the Utah Public Drinking Water Rules, UAC R309-110-4. 6. UAC R309-100-7 requires the Director to “assign a rating to each public water supply in order to provide a concise indication of its condition and performance” in accordance with R309-400. This rule is generally known as the Improvement Priority System (“IPS”) rating system. 7. The IPS rating system “is a point system used by the division to evaluate a public water system’s performance and compliance with the drinking water rules in Title 309, Environmental Quality, Drinking Water.” UAC R309-400-3(1). Under the IPS rating system, each public water system is assigned a rating “to characterize the water system’s compliance with drinking water rules and overall operation and performance.” UAC R309-400-3(2). The IPS rating system is “used by the division to assign compliance ratings to public water systems and to prioritize enforcement action based on points assessed for noncompliance with drinking water rules.” UAC R309-400-1(1). 8. UAC R309-400-4(1)(a)(ii) directs the Director to establish “the point thresholds for assigning an Approved or Not Approved rating for each type of water system.” For systems exceeding the point threshold, the Director may issue a “Not Approved” rating. The thresholds are as follows: (i) for community water systems, 150 points; (ii) for non-transient, non-community water systems, 120 points; and (iii) for non-community water systems, 100 points. 9. UAC R309-400-4(4) allows the Director to assess points against public water systems upon their failure to comply with Division directives and orders. 10. UAC R309-400-5(1)(b)(ii) allows the Director to rate any public water system as “Not Approved” at any time if an immediate threat to public health exists. 11. UAC R309-400-5(1)(c) provides that a public water system may qualify for a “Corrective Action” rating for its public water system “based on a current, written agreement with the division to resolve underlying noncompliance according to a compliance schedule.” 12. Pursuant to Utah Code § 19-4-106(d), the Director may enforce rules promulgated by the Board through the issuance of orders. See also UAC R309-100-8. 13. Utah Code § 19-4-107 provides that upon discovery of any violation of the Act or a rule of the Board, the Director shall promptly notify the supplier of the violation, state the nature of the violation and issue an order requiring correction of that violation. 14. Utah Code § 19-4-109 provides that any person who violates the Act or a rule or order made or issued pursuant to the Act may be subject to an administrative penalty of up to $1,000 per day of violation or a civil penalty of up to $5,000 per day of violation. FINDINGS Based on information in the Division’s administrative files, the Director makes the following Findings for purposes of this Order: 15. There exists approximately North Ogden in Weber County, Utah, a drinking water system known as the Pole Patch Water System (the “System”) that serves a population of approximately 70 persons. The System generally includes a single source consisting of a consecutive wholesale connection to Utah Public Drinking Water System Pleasant View Water System (UTAH29014), two concrete ground storage tanks totaling approximately 165,000 gallons of finished water storage, a pump station, and an independent distribution system supplying 27 residential service connections. 16. This Not Approved Administrative Order is necessary to ensure compliance and protect the health of users of the Pole Patch Water System. 17. On September 02, 2022, a Utah Department of Environmental Quality Engineer conducted a Sanitary Survey of the system and identified multiple significant deficiencies. Among these deficiencies are not having backup power for the sources and several months of missed chlorine residual samples. These deficiencies are listed in the attached Master IPS Report. 18. The Supplier is the owner and/or operator of the System and is therefore legally responsible for the System and for compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations. The Supplier qualifies as a “person” within the meaning of the Utah Safe Drinking Water Act and the Utah Public Drinking Water Rules. 19. The System qualifies as a community system under the Utah Public Drinking Water Rules. The maximum number of points allowed for this type of system is 150. 20. For the reasons stated in the Master IPS Report attached hereto as Exhibit A, the System has been assigned 135 points. 21. It is essential for a community water system with a single source to have backup power for its source. In the event of a power outage, the source may become compromised, leading to a disruption in water distribution and outages, potentially leading to pressure events and allowing greater vulnerability for contamination and waterborne pathogens to enter the distribution system. 22. Monitoring monthly residual chlorination in a drinking water system is crucial to ensure the ongoing safety and quality of the water supply and, consequently, protect public health. Regular monitoring of residual chlorination levels allows water operators to verify that an adequate amount of chlorine remains in the water distribution system. This residual chlorine is essential because it continues to disinfect the water as it travels through pipelines, ensuring it remains free from harmful pathogens. 23. The Director hereby ratifies and adopts the violations and deficiencies reflected in the Master IPS Report, along with all previous actions by the Division that relate to such violations and deficiencies. Such actions include sanitary surveys, notices of violation, and the assessment of points for such violations and deficiencies, all as reflected in the Division’s administrative files relating to the System. 24. Prior to issuing this Order, the Director provided the Supplier with notice of the System’s then - current Master IPS report and afforded the Supplier with an opportunity to provide any rebuttal or objections to the Director for consideration. Despite these notices, the Supplier has failed to reduce the System point assessments below the threshold. ORDER Based on the foregoing Findings and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 25. The System is hereby rated as “Not Approved” under the Utah Public Drinking Water Rules. 26. The Supplier shall provide a Tier II public notice of the substance of this Order (specifically, the Director’s rating of the System as “Not Approved”), pursuant to UAC R309-100-8(1) and R309- 220-6(3), as follows: (a) Such notice shall be provided to each and every customer related to the System (or who otherwise receives a bill for water service). Such notice must be reasonably calculated to provide actual notice to such persons and may be provided through mail or direct delivery, hand delivery, publication in a local newspaper, posting in public places served by your system, or the System or Supplier’s website, if applicable; (b) Such notice shall be provided to the health department with jurisdiction over the System. (c) For each 90 day period that the System is rated as “Not Approved,” the Supplier shall provide repeat notices to all consumers served by the System, in accordance with the schedule applicable to Tier II notices. 27. In accordance with UAC R309-105-16(3), within 10 days of completing the public notification requirements described above (for the initial public notice and any repeat notices), the Supplier shall submit to the Director a certification that it has fully complied with the notice requirements described above. Such certification shall include a representative copy of each type of notice distributed, published, posted, and made available in accordance with this Order. 28. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a preliminary Enforcement Order Schedule – UTAH29107 (“Enforcement Order Schedule”) listing the violations and deficiencies associated with the System. Within 30 days of the Date of Issuance, the Supplier shall submit to the Director a complete Enforcement Order Schedule describing in detail the specific corrective actions the Supplier shall undertake in order to resolve the violations and deficiencies as described in the Master IPS Report, including the dates when such actions are expected to be completed. If the Director finds that the Supplier’s Enforcement Order Schedule submission is adequate and reasonable to ensure compliance, the Director will attempt to negotiate a form of Not Approved Order (“NAO”) that is acceptable to the Director. If negotiations are not successful or if the Supplier fai ls to submit a timely or complete Enforcement Order Schedule, the Director may pursue other enforcement actions in order to resolve the violations and deficiencies described in the attached Master IPS Report, together with any other accrued violations and deficiencies. GENERAL PROVISIONS 29. This Order does not in any way relieve the Supplier from any other obligation imposed under the Act or any other state, federal, or local law, rule, or regulation. 30. Nothing contained in this Order shall preclude the Director from taking actions to include additional penalties against the Supplier for future violations of State or Federal law. 31. The Date of Issuance shall be the date that this Order is signed by the Director. 32. The dates set forth in the Order section of this Order may be extended in writing by the Director, in the Director’s sole discretion, based on the Supplier’s showing of good cause. Good cause for an extension generally means events outside of the reasonable control of the Supplier, such as force majeure, inclement weather, contractor or supplier delays, and similar circumstances. However, the Director expects the Supplier to employ reasonable means to limit foreseeable causes of delay. The timeliness of the Supplier’s request for an extension shall constitute an important factor in the Director’s evaluation. COMPLIANCE AND PENALTY NOTICE All violations of the Utah Safe Drinking Water Act, the Drinking Water Rules, and this Order will be strictly enforced during the time that this Order remains in effect. The Utah Safe Drinking Water Act, Utah Code § 19-4-109, provides that any person who violates a rule or order made or issued pursuant to the Act may be subject to an administrative penalty of up to $1,000 per day of violation or, in a civil proceeding, to a civil penalty of up to $5,000 per day of violation. Under certain circumstances of willfulness or gross negligence, a Utah district court judge may impose an additional penalty up to $5,000 per day of violation. Under the act, each day may be considered a separate violation. A violator may also be subject to injunctive relief pursuant to Utah Code § 19-4-107(2). CONTEST AND APPEAL RIGHTS This Order is effective immediately and shall become final unless the Supplier contests its validity or correctness in writing within thirty (30) days of the date of its issuance. See Utah Code Utah Code § 63G- 4-102(2)(k). The validity or correctness of this Order may be contested by filing a written Request for Agency Action in accordance with UAC R305-7. Filing a request for a hearing or a general statement of disagreement is not sufficient under Utah Code § 63G-4-201(3)(a) to preserve your right to contest the validity or correctness of this Order. A request for Agency Action must include the information specified in UAC R305-7. Contest proceedings are also governed by Utah Code Section 19-1-301. Failure to file a Request for Agency Action within the period provided operates waives any right of the administrative contest, reconsideration, review or judicial appeal. An extension is only available under UAC R305-7. To contest the validity or correctness of this Order, the Supplier must respond in writing and must comply with the applicable procedural requirements found at UAC R305-7 and with the applicable requirements of the Utah Administrative Procedures Act, including Utah Code § 63G-4-201(3)(a) and (b). The Supplier’s written Request for Agency Action must be received by the Director within 30 days of the date of issuance of this Order. The written Request to the Director should be addressed to Nathan Lunstad, P.O. Box 144830, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830. Initiation of an appeal proceeding via email or fax is not permitted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 19th day of January 2024. DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER By: Nathan Lunstad, P.E. Director Exhibit B Enforcement Order Schedule UTAH29107-a01 System Name: Pole Patch Homeowners Association Inc. System Number: UTAH29107 Administrative Contact: Tyson Jackson Email: tysonjack005@gmail.com Phone Number: 801-668-6989 Corrective Action Requirements and Due Dates Date of Issuance: January 18, 2024 Pump Station 1, (PF001) Item #1 Code Facility Deficiency Rule Citation S033 PF001 Community system without naturally flowing sources lacks backup power for at least one source. R309-515-6(2)(a) Recommended Corrective Action Completion Due Date Ensure there is backup power for the source. 07/01/2024 Monitoring Violations Item #2 Violation code Requirement Rule Citation 36 Failure to monitor and report distribution system chlorine residuals R309-210-4 Recommended Corrective Action Completion Due Date Submit missing chlorine residuals and continuously monitor and report chlorine residuals. For the duration of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED AND AGREED. DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER By: Nathan Lunstad, P.E. Director DATE: ___________________________________ January 19, 2024 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I served a copy of Administrative Order: “Not Approved” Rating Determination for Pole Patch Homeowners Association Inc. Water System UTAH29107 via registered mail to the following: Pole Patch Water System REGISTERED MAIL # Tyson Jackson, Administrative Contact 3335 N. 250 W. North Ogden, UT 84414 Pole Patch Landowners Association Inc. REGISTERED MAIL # John Sears, Registered Agent 14616 Juniper View Dr PO Box 618 Riverton, UT 84065 __________________________________ Name __________________________________ Date