The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDSHW-2024-006543CORRECTIVE ACTION SECTION – SITE VISIT REPORT SITE NAME: Cottonwood Square / Former Henries Cry Cleaners DATE: 05 / 29 / 2024 EPA ID #: N/A UTCA ID#: UTCA-0021 LOCATION: 1781 East Murray-Holladay Road Millcreek, UT PROJECT MANAGER: Ethan Upton SITE STATUS ___ Active Investigation ___Ongoing Cleanup Activities ___Confirmation Sampling _X_ Long-term Institutional Controls in-place [Site Management Plan (SMP), Environmental Covenant (EC), and/or Post Closure Plan (PCP)] _X_ Long-term Groundwater Monitoring OTHER (describe): PURPOSE OF SITE VISIT ___ Drive-by (windshield survey) _X_ Sample Observation &/or Collection ___ Site Investigation ___ Cleanup Activities Inspection ___ Confirm Current Land Usage ___ Confirm Cleanup Completed ___ Confirm Integrity of Engineering Controls ___ Confirm Compliance with SMP/EC D2# for SMP/EC: ___ Post-Closure Permit Verification ___ Document Change in Land Usage OTHER (describe): FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Observed the 2024 annual groundwater sampling event perform by Wasatch Environmental. MW-1, MW- 6, and MW-11 were sampling during the Site visit. An MS/MSD was collected from MW-1 and a Duplicate was collected from MW-6. It should be noted that tubing for the sampling was placed in the top two feet of the water column. It is recommended that when sampling for VOCs the tubing be placed in the middle of the well screen; or if the well screen is partially exposed, between the top of the water column and the bottom of the well. Additionally, Wasatch field personnel claimed that the water level meter was not working appropriately. Water level measurements were collected by placing the water level meter down the well and watching for the meter to break the plane of the water table. The measurement was then recorded. This is not ideal and might skew the potentiometric mapping and data from this sampling event. However, based on the historical knowledge of the Site, groundwater flow is well established. SAMPLE COLLECTION Were Environmental Samples Collected per the approved Sampling & Analysis Plan? YES _X_ NO ___ N/A ___ COMMENTS: Is the Work Being Performed in a Manner Consistent with the Approved Workplan(s)? YES _X_ NO ___ N/A __ Unknown (Drive-By Inspection Only) ___ COMMENTS: Sampling was observed being performed in accordance with workplan (DSHW-2021- 025184). CURRENT LAND USAGE ___ Residential _X_ Commercial ___ Industrial ___ Mixed Commercial w/ Residential ___ Under Construction &/or Development ___ Other: __________________________________ COMMENTS: FUTURE LAND USAGE ___ Residential ___ Mixed Commercial w/ Residential _X_ Commercial ___ Other: (describe below) ___ Industrial ___ Unknown at this time COMMENTS: POST-CLEANUP SITE VISITS Is the Completed Cleanup Remedy Still Protective Based on Current Land Use? YES _X_ NO ___ Unknown (Drive-By Inspection Only) ___ COMMENTS: LONG-TERM INSTITUTION CONTROL(S) VERIFICATION Are Components or Restrictions of the SMP, EC &/or PCP Currently Being Complied with? YES _X_ NO ___ Unknown (Drive-By Inspection Only) ___ COMMENTS: SITE VISIT CONCLUSIONS The groundwater monitoring and sampling appears to be in accordance with the approved work plan. RECOMMENDATIONS N/A ATTACHMENTS (PHOTOS, MAPS, FIGURES, TABLES, etc.) YES ___ NO _X_ SIGNATURE: