HomeMy WebLinkAboutDERR-2024-007470
SITE INVESTIGATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS REPORT
Maple Street Plume
Salt Lake County, Utah
UTN000820949
May 2020
ANALYTICAL RESULTS REPORT
Maple Street Plume
Salt Lake County, Utah
UTN000820949
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Prepared by: W. Patrick Frier
Approved: Date: _________
W. Patrick Frier, Project Manager
Approved: Date: _________
Thomas Daniels, Site Assessment Section Manager
Approved: Date: _________
Ryan Dunham, Site Assessment Manager, EPA Region 8
W. Patrick Frier (Jun 24, 2020 13:31 MDT)
W. Patrick Frier
? E • A C • A ? A ?
06/24/2020
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 ii
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 OBJECTIVES 1
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1
3.1 Site Location and Description 1
3.2 Site History and Previous Work 2
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES 3
5.0 DEVIATIONS FROM THE WORK PLAN 3
6.0 WASTE/SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS 4
6.1 Waste/Source Properties 4
6.2 Waste/Source Sample Locations 4
6.3 Waste/Source Data Assessment 4
7.0 GROUNDWATER PATHWAY 5
7.1 Hydrogeology 5
7.2 Groundwater Targets and Conclusions 6
8.0 SURFACE WATER PATHWAY 7
9.0 SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY 7
9.1 Geology Background 7
9.2 Soil Background 8
9.3 Soil Targets and Conclusions 8
10.0 SOIL VAPOR / SUBSURFACE INTRUSION PATHWAY 8
10.1 Soil Vapor Background 8
10.2 Soil Vapor Targets 9
10.3 Soil Gas Sample Locations 9
10.4 Analytical Results 9
10.5 Soil Gas Conclusions 10
11.0 AIR PATHWAY 11
11.1 Meteorology and Air Pathway Background 11
11.2 Air Pathway Targets and Conclusions 11
12.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT 12
13.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 12
14.0 REFERENCES 13
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 iii
LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND APPENDICES
FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Sample Locations
TABLES
Table 1 Sample Locations, Descriptions, and Rationale
Table 2 Sample Analyses Checklist
Table 3 Soil Gas – Summary of Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations
Table 4 Data Quality Objectives
APPENDICES
Appendix A Field Activities Report
Appendix B Consent For Access To Property Form
Appendix C Weston Solutions Maple Street Plume Trip Report and Data Validation Reports
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Under authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986,
in accordance with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), and through a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8 (EPA), the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), Division of
Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has prepared this Site Inspection (SI)
Analytical Results Report (ARR) for the Maple Street Plume, UTN000820949, (herein referred
to as the “Site”) in Midvale, Salt Lake County, Utah. The sampling and analytical procedures
described herein were designed to provide information on the presence of hazardous materials
that may pose a threat to human or environmental health at the Site.
This investigation was initiated because a chlorinated solvent, tetrachloroethene (PCE), was
discovered during routine water quality monitoring of a municipal well. Through the course of
this work, PCE and trichloroethene (TCE) were both identified in soil gas samples. These
substances are nervous system depressants and were found in concentrations which exceed their
respective EPA benchmark concentrations. Both substances are known to have deleterious
effects on human and environmental health.
The purpose of this document is to present new data, summarize pertinent results from previous
studies, identify potentially hazardous conditions, describe data gaps, and determine the most
appropriate next steps that can be taken to protect human and environmental health at the Site.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of the sampling performed at the Site was to determine the source and
extent of contamination that could pose a threat to human health and the environment. The
findings contained herein serve as a record of hazardous materials identified within samples from
the Site and provide a basis upon which to determine the appropriateness of continued
management under CERCLA or including it within another cleanup program or authority. This
report presents new data from six soil gas samples along with limited groundwater data from
previous investigations. The objectives of the sampling associated with this SI were to:
• Identify the concentration of chlorinated solvents in all suspected source areas;
• Assess potential contaminant migration pathways;
• Assess potential exposure pathways;
• Identify potential targets that may be affected by on-Site contamination and those which
may be impacted by the migration of that contamination via suspected pathways;
• Provide a basis for future indoor air sampling near suspected source areas; and,
• Determine if continued assessment under CERCLA or some other authority is warranted.
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Site Location and Description
The Maple Street Plume Site is located in Midvale, Salt Lake County, Utah. The municipal well
where contaminants were first identified is located at 7610 South Maple Street, immediately east
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 2
of a Utah Transit Authority Rail Line and south of a cul de sac and homes at the end of
Blisswood Drive (Figure 1 and 2). Access to the municipal well site is provided along an
abandoned roadway (Park Street) where it intersects Maple Street, directly south of a church
yard. The two wells at that location are referred to as the Park Street (Cold) Well and Park Street
(Warm) Well in reference to the abandoned roadway. The surrounding area contains mixed
residential and commercial real estate, including five historic and current laundry or dry-cleaning
facilities (Figure 2). Such facilities are significant because they regularly utilize chlorinated
solvents in their work, making them important analysis sites for understanding the source and
distribution of contaminants.
3.2 Site History and Previous Work
Contamination was first recognized at the Site in 2010, when regular groundwater sampling from
the Park Street (Cold) Well identified PCE at a concentration of 1.7 µg/L. PCE was not detected
in groundwater samples taken from the second well at the same location; however, both wells
were abandoned in 2013 due to average uranium concentrations (43 µg/L) in excess of the
drinking water Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 30 µg/L (Utah Division of Drinking
Water 2019; Hoyle 2018). Uranium can occur in drinking water naturally due to its occasional
presence in aquifer sediments; however, PCE is not naturally occurring and is most often
introduced to the environment through its use as a solvent in industrial processes, particularly dry
cleaning. Water quality testing continued to identify trace amounts of PCE until the well was
abandoned in 2013, but always at concentrations below the MCL for PCE (5 µg/L). These
limited data are the only direct record of groundwater contamination at the Site. Further
groundwater testing via these wells is not possible because they were permanently abandoned
and are no longer operable (Utah Division of Drinking Water, 2019; Hoyle 2018).
A Preliminary Assessment (PA) completed in January 2019 identified five laundry and/or dry-
cleaning facilities that might have used chlorinated solvents as part of their operations (Taylor,
2019). One of these dry-cleaning locations (Harv’s Cleaners) was misidentified and not
recognized at its proper location until after sampling was complete. Harv’s Cleaners operated
from 1958 to 1974 at 804 East Center Street (R.L. Polk and Company, 1960; Salt Lake County
Auditor, 1998). The address of Harv’s Cleaners changed in 1998 not because they moved
locations but because of a change in the naming nomenclature for the streets in that area.
Because of this, Harv’s Cleaners was not properly identified in the PA and not incorporated into
the sampling procedure for this SI. Conversely, the PA falsely identified a separate potential
contaminant source, Rex Fine Cleaners, as being within the area of the Site. Upon proper
identification of its location due to the change in street nomenclature, Rex Fine Cleaners was
found to have operated far to the west and outside the pertinent area. This particular change was
identified prior to establishing the work plan and the false Rex Cleaners location was not
included in sampling for this SI.
The following potential contaminant sources identified in the PA were investigated as part of this
SI (Figure 2):
• Day-Nite Laundercenter located at 7692 South Maple Street (formerly 29 Maple Street),
White Raven Tattoo currently operates from this location.
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 3
• One-Hour Martinizing located at 118 West Center Street. The business name has changed
to Fashion Cleaners, but still operates as a dr y cleaner.
• Matt’s Cleaners located at 7565 South State Street. Just A Car Lot, a used car sale
company, currently operates at this location.
• Norge Dry Cleaning Village located at 7615 South State Street. J and J Tire currently
operates from this location.
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
All field activities (Appendix A) and preliminary work was either conducted by or coordinated
by N. Taylor, retired UDEQ Project Manager. A “Consent for Access to Property” form was
signed by the respective property owners prior to sample collection (example form in Appendix
B). Samples were collected from the potential source areas where property owners allowed
access. (Tables 1 and 2; Figure 2). The owner of Just A Car Lot, the former site of Matt’s
Cleaners, initially granted but then revoked property access prior to sampling. That location was
therefore not included in field work or analysis.
Weston Solutions Inc., an environmental services firm, collected the samples and operated the
direct-push well drilling equipment. Boreholes were installed to a depth of six feet below ground
surface (bgs) using a Geoprobe® with steel push rods. Soil gas samples were collected using
SUMMA® Canisters. Purified air was also placed within a SUMMA® Canister and carried with
the sample team. This sample (Trip Blank-01) was submitted along with the other samples for
laboratory analysis.
Another borehole was drilled to a depth of 25 feet bgs at 7615 South State Street in an attempt to
access shallow groundwater. This borehole failed to achieve a sufficient depth to access the
groundwater, which is generally consistent with drilling information on file with the Utah
Division of Water Rights that estimated the local shallow groundwater to be at a depth of 30-70
feet bgs (Butterfield, 1955; Jenkins, 1996; Comer, 1961).
5.0 DEVIATIONS FROM THE WORK PLAN
Unforeseen circumstances led to several significant deviations from the September 2019 EPA-
approved SI Work Plan. These changes resulted in the collection and analysis of eight fewer
samples. Changes to the Work Plan include:
• Samples MS-01 and MS-02 were not collected from 7565 South State Street (Just A Car
Lot, formerly Matt’s Cleaners) because the property owner withdrew access to the site
prior to field work.
• Background soil gas sample MS-10 was not collected because the utilities were not
marked prior to the sampling date.
• MS-06 and MS-11 were collected from an unplanned location at the southeast corner of
the J and J Tire parking lot. These samples were moved to a location about 60 feet
southeast of the J and J Tire backdoor and used as replacement background samples.
• None of the five planned groundwater samples were collected because drilling did not
achieve a sufficient depth to access groundwater.
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 4
These changes to the work plan did alter the ability of this SI to sufficiently describe conditions
at the Site. The potential source area at 7565 South State Street was not evaluated because the
property owner chose to deny sampling access. The samples that were collected successfully
allow for assessment of three other potential source areas, the historic or current locations of
Norge Laundry, Day-Nite Laundercenter, and Fashion Cleaners. That being said, a separate
potential source area, the historic location of Harv’s Cleaners, was also not characterized because
it was not identified until after sampling was complete (section 3.2). The final result of these
conditions is that two of the five potential source areas remain uncharacterized by this SI.
Finally, no direct soil or indoor air samples were collected as part of this SI. Thus no conclusions
can be drawn from the concentration of contaminants in soil/sediment or indoor air.
6.0 WASTE/SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS
6.1 Waste/Source Properties
PCE was measured at a concentration of 1.7 μg/L in groundwater from the Park Street (Cold)
Well. Because PCE is widely used in dry cleaning and degreasing operations, the source of this
contamination is likely from one or more laundry/dry cleaning facilities near the Site. PCE is
more dense and less viscous than water (Schwille, 1988), which allows it to sink in groundwater
and flow through rock or sediments that would normally impede fluid flow. As such, PCE can
cross aquifer boundaries and contaminate groundwater across those boundaries. Furthermore, its
insolubility in water makes PCE very difficult to remove from the groundwater system (Pankow
and Cherry, 1996).
Physiologically, PCE is a nervous system depressant. Exposure to vaporous PCE can result in
dizziness, headaches, nausea, unconsciousness, and death. Prolonged exposure can cause liver
and kidney damage. Tests on animals exposed to PCE show increased rates of tumor production
and pregnancy complications (ATSDR, n.d.).
6.2 Waste/Source Sample Locations
Soil-gas samples were collected from the following potential source locations,
• Adjacent to the building located at 7615 South State Street (MS-03, MS-06, and MS-11).
This is the prior location of Norge Laundry and Dry Cleaning Village. J and J Tire
currently operates from this property. MS-06 and MS-11 were taken from the far
southeast corner of the lot and used as background samples.
• On the north and south side of 7692 South Maple Street (MS-04 and MS-05), which was
the prior location of the Day-Nite Laundercenter. White Raven Tattoo now operates
here.
• On the property of Fashion Cleaners (formerly One-Hour Martinizing) located at 118
West Center (MS-09).
6.3 Waste/Source Data Assessment
Pertinent EPA guidance indicates that analytical results from field samples should be compared
to those from background samples in order to determine “observed contamination” in soils or an
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 5
“observed release” in other media. Samples are identified as contaminated if they significantly
exceed background concentrations. This determination is made using two criteria:
• If a substance is not detected in the background sample, the concentration of the
substance in the sample must equal or exceed the sample quantitation limit (SQL), the
lowest concentration at which an analyte is both proven present and measured reliably; or
• If the background sample concentration equals or exceeds the detection limit, the sample
must exceed the background concentration by at least three times (U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1990).
In this SI, if an analyte was shown to be present using either of the above criteria the results for
that sample were then compared to the EPA Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) benchmark
values for near-source and/or sub-slab air and the Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM)
Subsurface Intrusion Component benchmark values. VISL benchmark concentrations were
determined using default settings (target cancer risk level of one per million [10-6] and a target
hazarded quotient of 1.0 for non-cancer effects) within the EPA VISL Calculator
(https://www.epa.gov/vaporintrusion/visl-users-guide). Those VISL calculation settings were
used to generate both the residential and industrial/commercial VISL benchmarks, which are
used based on the pattern of use at the property in question. These benchmarks were chosen to
provide a simple yet distinctly conservative and preliminary point of comparison. This allows for
direct comparison of contaminant concentrations to both their residential and commercial VISL
concentrations specifically designed for near-source and/or sub-slab soil gas.
SCDM reference values were determined by querying the EPA’s SCDM online reference system
(https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-chemical-data-matrix-scdm-query). Two different
values that relate to different toxicological affects are given from the SCDM, the Cancer Risk
(CR) and Non-cancer Risk (NCR) benchmarks for the Subsurface Intrusion Component (SsI).
Both the VISL and SCDM SsI benchmarks are applicable to soil-gas samples, but exceeding a
given benchmark does not constitute a confirmed threat to indoor air or human health. Rather,
exceeding a benchmark is an indication that that sampling location might warrant further
consideration alongside other site-specific factors. Table 3 provides a summary of all soil gas
samples and highlights those which meet the above criteria and exceed any of these benchmark
values. These data are presented alongside the reference VISL and SCDM values for each
analyte.
7.0 GROUNDWATER PATHWAY
7.1 Hydrogeology
The Park Street (Cold) Well was drilled in 1961 for Midvale City Public Utilities. It is a 16-inch
diameter well that produced a flow of 6.67 cubic feet per second (cfs) before it was sealed in
2013. The well is 475 feet deep and drew water from three zones: [1] 150-200 feet bgs, [2] 253-
260 feet bgs, and [3] 305-315 feet bgs. The most shallow confining clay layer is located 200-253
feet bgs, meaning that the well drew a portion of its water from the most shallow aquifer (Utah
Division of Water Rights, 1961).
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 6
The Park Street (Warm) Well is immediately adjacent to the Park Street (Cold) Well and also has
a diameter of 16 inches. It was drilled in 1966 and, before being sealed in 2013, produced a flow
of 0.61 cfs. This well was drilled to a significantly greater depth than the first (782 feet) and only
produced water from depths below the confining clay layer (Utah Division of Water Rights,
1961; Hoyle, 2018; Utah Division of Drinking Water, 2018).
Both Park Street wells are located among alluvial basin sediments of the Salt Lake Valley, which
consist of unconsolidated to semi-consolidated deposits of Tertiary to Quaternary age (Thiros,
2010). The groundwater system in these valley deposits includes both a shallow and deep
aquifer, separated by discontinuous layers of fine-grained sediment. The deeper aquifer is
generally unconfined in proximity to the mountains and becomes confined by these fine-grained
deposits closer to the valley center. Groundwater generally moves laterally from the unconfined
portion of the deep aquifer near the mountains to the confined zone near the valley center.
Groundwater also moves from the overlying shallow aquifer to the deeper basin-fill aquifer in
areas where the hydraulic gradient is downward and the confining layers are discontinuous or
absent. However, the topographically lowest portions of the valley, especially those near the
Jordan River, often have an upward hydraulic gradient and move water from the deeper aquifer
to the shallower one. The boundary between these dynamics and the distinction between the two
aquifers is unclear or understood only in general terms in many parts of the valley (Thiros, 2003;
Thiros, 2010).
The Park Street wells and the rest of the Site are located relatively close to the Jordan River near
the center of the valley, where confining clay layers are common yet discontinuous and shallow
groundwater is locally present beginning 30 - 70 feet bgs (Hoyle, 2018; Utah Division of
Drinking Water, 2018; Utah Division of Water Rights, 2018). Groundwater is presumed to flow
westward toward the Jordan River. The shallow aquifer at the Site is likely recharged both by
exchange from the deeper aquifer, where confining layers are discontinuous, and by
precipitation, runoff, and seepage from irrigation/canals. Throughout the valley, the shallow
aquifer is less than 50 feet thick in most areas and is generally not used as a drinking water
source because of poor yield, poor chemical quality, and the availability of other sources
(Waddell, et al., 1987). Anthropogenic compounds (e.g. tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, and chloroform) are known to be present in the shallow aquifer at various
locations across the valley and could potentially travel into the deeper aquifer (Thiros, 2003).
These regional trends are the only information available on groundwater dynamics at the Site
because no nuanced Site-specific analysis exists.
7.2 Groundwater Targets and Conclusions
The deeper aquifer is the primary water supply for the Salt Lake metropolitan area (Hely,
Mower, and Harr, 1971); however, it has not been accessed at the Site since 2013 when the Park
Street wells were permanently sealed (Utah Division of Drinking Water 2019; Hoyle 2018).
Fifty-six wells owned and operated by eight public entities are located within the four miles of
the Site. The Park Street wells, although sealed, are the closest down-gradient wells and are
located about 800 feet north of the closest potential source (Day Nite Laundercenter). There are
no active down-gradient wells within four miles. The nearest active well, oblique to the
groundwater gradient, is the Murray City 7th West #7 well located 1.3 miles northwest of the
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 7
Site. No chlorinated solvents have been detected in that well. There are 5,087 Points of Diversion
(PODs) within a four-mile radius of the Site (Utah Division of Water Rights, 2019).
This SI was originally initiated because PCE was directly identified in groundwater from the
Site; however, no new groundwater data was generated through this investigation because
drilling did not achieve a sufficient depth and the original wells have been abandoned. Because
the on-Site wells were sealed for other reasons, there are no active down-gradient drinking water
wells located within four miles of the Site. Because of this, exposure directly through the
groundwater pathway is unlikely. However, the ability of PCE to cross aquifer boundaries
(section 6.1) and the discontinuous nature of the confining layer between the shallow and deep
aquifers (section 7.1) mean that there is at least some possibility of contamination traveling
through groundwater to locations away from the Site. Exchange of contaminants into the deeper
aquifer at this location is unlikely if the hydraulic gradient between the deep and shallow
aquifers is indeed upward as assumed (section 7.1). Because that assumption is based on regional
trends and no further groundwater data are available, the potential for migration via groundwater
cannot be definitively ruled out. Groundwater is an unlikely exposure pathway at the Site, but
could serve as a migration pathway.
8.0 SURFACE WATER PATHWAY
The Site is located near the center of the Salt Lake Valley at an elevation of ~4,380 feet above
sea level (Davis, 2000). The valley is approximately 28 mi x 18 mi and bound almost entirely by
mountains, except on its north end where both surface water and groundwater drain into the
Great Salt Lake. The Site is located within relative proximity of the Jordan River, the major
through-going river that forms the primary drainage in the valley, but it is not located in any
recognized flood prone area. Surface water at the Site flows ~1.5 miles westward toward the
river, which then flows ~24 miles north and drains into the Great Salt Lake (Hely, Mower, and
Harr, 1971; Google Imagery, 2019).
The Site is largely developed and paved over by concrete and other impermeable surfaces that
are conducive to rapid overland flow during rain events. These areas are discontinuously
fragmented by lawns, green spaces, and undeveloped lots where surface water can infiltrate the
ground surface and recharge the shallow aquifer. Surface water flow at the Site is heavily
controlled by engineered surfaces including storm drains and culverts, which give surface water
a very brief residence time at the Site. No surface water samples were analyzed as part of this SI.
It is unlikely that surface water provides a migration and exposure pathway at the Site because
no permanent bodies of water exist there and transient surface water is unlikely to interact with
contaminate sources.
9.0 SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY
9.1 Geology Background
The Site is located west of the Wasatch Range near the center of the Salt Lake Valley and
overlies various Quaternary lacustrine deposits, including Bonneville Lake Cycle Deposits of the
late Pleistocene (Davis, 2000). At the Site, these deposits include brown to gray calcareous
laminated silt and sandy silt with isolated pebbles, cobbles, and minor lenses of sand and gravel,
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 8
which may have been deposited as dropstones and turbidity flows (Davis, 2000). The thickness
of this unit is quite variable, ranging from ~1 to ~39 feet thick and it is underlain by pre-Lake
Bonneville deposits of clay, silt, sand, and gravel of mixed fluvial and lacustrine origin. These
older underlying deposits vary between 500 and 800 feet thick and are themselves underlain by
various Tertiary age sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Salt Lake Formation (Davis, 2000).
9.2 Soil Background
Soils at the site formed on top of the Quaternary lacustrine deposits, but are heavily reworked by
anthropogenic activity (infrastructure installation, building, paving, ect.). Based on generalized
regional soil maps surface soils at the site are generally loams that developed on very gentle
slopes (0-4%) and are well drained (NRCS, 2019). The surface soil horizon on Site includes an
approximately 0-6 inch deep plow layer above the rest of the A horizon, which extends to as
much as 15 inches depth. Below this horizon is a Bt layer (~15-26 inches) of translocated clays
and a Bk horizon (~26-33 inches) of accumulated calcium carbonate leached from the upper
horizons (NRCS, 2019). The upper portions of the C horizon also shows the accumulation of
translocated calcium (CBk horizon; 33- 48 inches) before giving way to stratified fine sand and
silty clay loam to a depth of 60 inches (NRCS, 2019).
9.3 Soil Targets and Conclusions
The municipal well where PCE was first identified is located within a few yards of residential
areas (Figure 2), including backyards and probable family gathering spaces. As a relatively
densely populated area, approximately 14,354 people live within one mile of the Site (U.S.
Census Bureau, 2010). Contaminants could be present within on-Site soils at hazardous levels,
especially near suspected source areas. It is likely that many areas of concern are beneath
pavement or asphalt, which would partition contaminants away from potential exposure to
humans, but this SI did not generate any new soil specific data that provide a basis upon which to
make that determination. While the potential for exposure through soil ingestion or direct dermal
contact is presumed to be low, this SI does not provide additional data or evidence of that. Nor is
any information available on the variability of soil contamination either spatially or with depth.
Direct soil data from the Site would support a more thorough and comprehensive understanding
of soil targets and the distribution of contaminants.
10.0 SOIL VAPOR / SUBSURFACE INTRUSION PATHWAY
10.1 Soil Vapor Background
Contaminants within soils or groundwater, especially volatile organic compounds, can manifest
as vapor in the interstitial spaces between sediment grains and amongst soil particles. These
volatile compounds can then migrate through soils and building materials, potentially affecting
indoor air quality and exposing individuals who live and work in the vicinity to dangerous
chemicals in the air that they breathe. PCE is one such volatile compound and it was present in
groundwater from the Park Street (Cold) Well at the Site during testing from 2010 – 2013
(Hoyle, 2018; Utah Division of Drinking Water, 2018).
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 9
10.2 Soil Vapor Targets
Because the definitive source of the PCE found in the on-Site well is unknown all individuals
and resources in relative proximity to the historic and current laundry facilities nearby could
potentially be exposed to contaminants by the intrusion of harmful vapors from the soil or
groundwater into buildings. Approximately 80 homes are located between the five potential
contaminant sources (section 6.0) and the contaminated well. Several homes and businesses are
directly adjacent to these potentially contaminated locations, which could expose humans to
harmful conditions. Five potential contaminant sources are currently known to exist (section
6.0). All homes and businesses near these locations are potential targets and could experience
vapor intrusion.
10.3 Soil Gas Sample Locations
No indoor air samples were collected through this SI; however, soil gas samples were collected
from three of the five potential source areas (section 6.2) in order to directly measure the
concentration of harmful materials in soil vapor at the Site (Figure 2). These samples are meant
to provide data on the presence of harmful materials and be used as a foundation for subsequent
testing. Soil gas samples were collected from the following locations (section 6.2):
• At the J and J Tire lot located at 7615 South State Street (MS-03, MS-06, and MS-11).
• On the southwest and southeast corners of White Raven Tattoo located at 7692 South
Maple Street (MS-04 and MS-05).
• At the site of Fashion Cleaners located at 118 West Center (MS-09).
10.4 Analytical Results
Each soil gas sample was analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in order to
determine whether dangerous conditions are present and to provide a basis for further testing.
PCE was the primary contaminant of concern in this study, but it was not the only contaminant
identified in the samples. PCE concentrations ranged from non-detect (SQL = 1 µg/m3) in the
White Raven Tattoo Samples to 303 µg/m3 in the J and J Tire samples (Table 3). Recall that both
the SCDM and VISL benchmark values are general points of comparison and that exceeding a
benchmark in reference to near-source soil gas does not constitute a confirmed threat to indoor
air. Indoor air itself was not analyzed, but comparing soil gas samples to such benchmarks helps
to place the concentrations into context. If concentrations in excess of benchmarks were
identified with indoor air itself that would warrant a different level of consideration. The results
include the following (Table 3):
• Background samples MS-06 and MS-11, taken from the southeast corner of the J and
J Tire lot, showed PCE concentrations of 44.2 µg/m3 and 5.17 µg/m3 respectively.
While these were low by comparison to some other samples and do not exceed the
VISL reference values (PCE Residential VISL = 360 µg/m3; PCE Commercial VISL
= 1570 µg/m3), the MS-06 sample does exceed SCDM benchmarks (SCDM PCE
NCR = 41.7 µg/m3; SCDM PCE CR = 10.8 µg/m3). The presence of PCE in the
background samples is significant and indicates the potential for greater contaminant
distribution than originally assumed. Lower PCE concentrations would likely have
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 10
been found in the originally planned background sample location (section 5.0). This
property is commercial, but directly adjacent to residential land.
• Sample MS-03, taken from the center of the J and J Tire lot, showed a PCE
concentration of 303 µg/m3. This is both greater than three times the background
concentration and in excess of the SCDM benchmark values (SCDM PCE NCR =
41.7 µg/m3; SCDM PCE CR = 10.8 µg/m3). This concentration is less than the VISL
benchmark (PCE Residential VISL = 360 µg/m3; PCE Commercial VISL = 1570
µg/m3). This site is commercial, but directly adjacent to residences.
• Neither samples MS-04 nor MS-05, taken from the White Raven Tattoo parking lot,
detected PCE in excess of the SQL (1 µg/m3). PCE was undetected in this location.
• The Fashion Cleaners sample, MS-09, showed a PCE concentration of 262
µg/m3(PCE Residential VISL = 360 µg/m3; PCE Commercial VISL = 1570 µg/m3;
SCDM PCE NCR = 41.7 µg/m3; SCDM PCE CR = 10.8 µg/m3). This value is both
greater than three times the background concentration and in excess of the VISL
Residential and both SCDM benchmarks. The property is commercial, but near a
multi-unit residential building.
• The Trip Blank detected PCE at a concentration marginally above the SQL, but
lower than any benchmark or threshold value. The Trip Blank contained PCE at a
concentration of 2 µg/m3. Although this is low, it could indicate some unknown cross
contamination between samples or faulty practice in the field or laboratory process.
• Trichlorethene (TCE; SCDM CR = 0.478 µg/m3; SCDM NCR = 2.09 µg/m3; VISL
Commercial = 100 µg/m3; VISL Residential = 16 µg/m3) was identified at a
concentration three times greater than the background in two samples, MS-03 (3.68
µg/m3) and MS-09 (13.10 µg/m3). These values exceed SCDM benchmarks.
• MS-09 also contains cis-1,2-Dichloroethene at a concentration of 23.70 µg/m3. No
benchmark value is established for this compound but it can cause hematological and
hepatic affects in humans. It is occasionally used in industrial practices, but is
primarily a byproduct of the production of other solvent compounds like vinyl
chloride (ATSDR, n.d.).
• Benzene was found at a maximum of 17.8 µg/m3 in MS-03 and exceeds at least one
benchmark value in all samples, apart from the Trip Blank.
• Trichlorofluoromethane (SCDM NRC = 1040 µg/m3) was found in samples MS-04
and MS-05 from White Raven Tattoo at 663 µg/m3 and 38.40 µg/m3 respectively. No
VISL concentration exists for this compound. The source of this chemical is
unknown, but it was historically used as a refrigerant.
10.5 Soil Gas Conclusions
PCE concentrations at J and J Tire and Fashion Cleaners (Samples MS-03 and MS-09) exceed
background values by three times and are above at least one relevant benchmark value. People
living or working at these locations or in proximity to them could be at risk of vapor intrusion
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 11
into their homes or businesses, but indoor air sampling is needed to determine if that is the case.
Two additional locations remain unknowns in regard to their soil gas concentrations, the former
sites of Harv’s Cleaners and Matt’s Cleaners, which are now an abandoned property and a used
car lot respectively.
While the new data presented herein indicate that both J and J Tires and Fashion Cleaners have
PCE present within soil gas, there remains no clear source for the PCE identified in the Park
Street (Cold) Well. Both locations are nominally up gradient from the well site and may have
contributed PCE to the well, but these cursory data do not provide enough evidence to
definitively say that they are or are not the source, especially considering that two other potential
sources of PCE in the area have not been analyzed at all.
Two conclusions can be drawn from the data currently available: [1] PCE and TCE are present as
soil vapor at the site in concentrations which could pose a potential threat to human and
environmental health if vapor intrusion does occur, and [2] PCE is likely migrating through the
subsurface from some combination of the sources outlined herein. These data do not provide
enough information to definitively state precisely how PCE came to be present in the well, but
they do suggest that there is at least some potential for vapor intrusion at nearby homes and
businesses.
11.0 AIR PATHWAY
11.1 Meteorology and Air Pathway Background
The Site is located in the Salt Lake Valley, which experiences meteorological phenomena
heavily controlled by its physiographic position surrounded almost entirely by mountains. It has
a semiarid environment with summer temperatures in excess of 100ºF and limited precipitation.
The July average maximum and minimum temperatures at the Site are 92.8ºF and 58.5ºF.
January average maximum and minimum temperatures are 38.3 ºF and 17.3 ºF with 14.73 inches
of average annual precipitation (Western Climate Research Center, n.d.). The region is known
for poor air quality, especially in winter, because stagnant aerosol laden air tends to rest over the
valley.
11.2 Air Pathway Targets and Conclusions
Certain contaminants under certain conditions can travel and affect people through the air.
Volatile compounds, such as those identified herein, can have such an effect; however, the
concentrations identified here were from samples at locations which are primarily paved over,
which limits the rate at which contaminants enter the air. Residences are located near the Site,
including eight homes within 800 feet of the contaminated well, five immediately southeast of J
and J Tire, and a large apartment complex adjacent to Fashion Cleaners (Figure 2).
Approximately 413,049 people live within four miles of the Site (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010).
The concentrations found herein are insufficient to affect people through general air exposure,
except through intrusion directly into the confined space of buildings (section 9.0). No obvious
airborne release of on Site waste is known to exist and outdoor air samples were not analyzed or
collected as part of this SI. Exposure through the air pathway is unlikely.
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 12
12.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT
The Weston Solutions trip report (Appendix C) includes Level 4 data validation and laboratory
analytical results for all samples collected. These data meet all quality objectives (Table 4) and
were collected in accordance with methods outlined in the DERR Quality Assurance Program
Plan for Environmental Data Operations (QAPP) of November 2018 and relevant EPA guidance
documents. Sampling events were recorded in the field and photographic evidence was collected
to corroborate findings (Appendix A).
13.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
PCE, a chlorinated solvent used in dry cleaning operations, was first identified at the Site in
groundwater from a municipal well that was subsequently closed. The closure of this well
prevents further groundwater testing. Five current or historic dry-cleaning facilities are proximal
to the contaminated well and were identified as possible sources of the contamination. Three of
these five possible contaminant sources were tested in the course of this SI, two of which
demonstrated PCE concentrations which both significantly exceed background values and
surpass relevant EPA benchmarks. Soil gas contaminated with PCE and TCE is present at both
7615 South State Street (J and J Tire) and 118 West Center Street (Fashion Cleaners). Samples
taken from 7692 South Maple Street (White Raven Tattoo) did not contain these chemicals.
These data indicate the presence of contaminants in soil gas at the Site, but do not rule out
contribution of contaminants from the untested potential sources. Several unknowns remain. The
historic locations of Matt’s Cleaners and Harv’s Cleaners could also be contributing
contaminants to the environment. Additionally, this SI did not generate any direct soil or
groundwater data. Thus, the media-specific source of the contamination found within the soil gas
and the nature of its migration to the well remain unknown.
Indoor air sampling should be considered at buildings in direct proximity to the locations where
contaminants have already been identified in order to better assess potential exposure pathways
at both homes and businesses. Future sampling should include soil, soil gas, sub-slab/near-slab
air, and indoor air. If groundwater can be accessed it should also be sampled, though that appears
unlikely. It is possible that local groundwater levels fluctuate and were just particularly low at
the time of attempted sampling (section 7.2).
It is likely that the PCE identified in the municipal groundwater well was, at least in part, derived
from the contaminated properties identified herein; however, until the other possible contaminant
sources are directly assessed, it is not possible to develop a sufficient understanding of the
contaminants on-Site. The DERR recommends that the Site be further studied through additional
targeted sampling to assess the contribution of contaminants from the unexamined potential
sources and determine the concentration of contaminants in indoor air.
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 13
14.0 REFERENCES
Anderson, P. B., D. D. Susong, S. R. Wold, V. M. Heilweil, and R. L. Baskin. 1994.
Hydrogeology of Recharge Areas and Water Quality of the Principal Aquifers along the
Wasatch Front and Adjacent Areas, Utah. Technical Publication, WRI-93-4221. United
States Geological Survey. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wri934221.
Arnow, Ted, Richard Van Horn, and Reed LaPray. 1970. The Pre-Quaternary Surface in the
Jordan Valley, Utah. Geological Survey Research Paper 700-D. U.S. Government
Printing Office.
ATSDR. n.d. “ATSDR - ToxFAQsTM: Tetrachloroethylene (PERC).” Accessed April 30, 2020.
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tfacts18.pdf
ATSDR. n.d. “ATSDR – Toxic Substances Portal: 1,2-Dichloroethane.” Accessed April 30,
2020. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/substances/toxsubstance.asp?toxid=82
Butterfield, Neil and Julion. 1955. “Well Abandonment Submission for Well 57-7330.” Utah
Division of Water Rights.
Comer, Eldon. 1961. “Well Driller’s Report Well 57-3165.” Lehi, Utah.
Davis, Fitzhugh D. 2000. Geologic Map of the Midvale Quadrangle, Salt Lake County, Utah.
Utah Geological Survey Map 177. Utah Department of Natural Resources.
Google Imagery. 2019. “SGID Base Map & Imagery Services Base- Hybrid Map of Vector
Features under License to Google Inc.”
Hely, Allen Grant, R. W Mower, and C. Albert Harr. 1971. Water Resources of Salt Lake
County, Utah. Technical Publication 31. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Natural
Resources.
Hoyle, Alan Ryan. 2018. Interview with Alan Ryan Hoyle, Midvale City Water Master.
Jenkins, Robin. 1996. “Well Driller’s Report Monitoring Well# 96-57-004-M-09.” Salt Lake
City, Utah: Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2019. Custom Soil Resources Report for Salt
Lake Area, Utah. United States Department of Agriculture. Accessed 12/17/19 using
Web Soil Survey Service. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
Pankow, James F., and John A. Cherry. 1996. Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLs in
Groundwater: History, Behavior, and Remediation. Portland, OR: Waterloo Press.
R. L. Polk, and Company. 1960. R.L. Polk & Co.’s Salt Lake City Directory. Salt Lake City,
Utah: R. L. Polk & Company.
Site Investigation – Analytical Results Report
Maple Street Plume – UTN000820949 14
Salt Lake County Auditor. 1998. “1998 Midvale City Address Change.” Salt Lake County
Auditor.
Schwille, Friedrich. 1988. Dense Chlorinated Solvents in Porous and Fractured Media: Model
Experiments. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.
Thiros, Susan A. 2003. Quality and Sources of Shallow Ground Water in Areas of Recent
Residential Development in Salt Lake Valley, Salt Lake County, Utah. Technical
Publication. United States Geological Survey. http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/wri034028/.
Thiros, Susan A. 2010. Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of the Basin-Fill
Aquifer in Salt Lake Valley, Utah in Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality
of Selected Basin-Fill Aquifers in the Southwestern United States, Professional Paper
1781. United States Geological Survey.
https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1781/pdf/pp1781_section2.pdf
U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. “U.S. Census 2010 Data.” Utah Automated Geographic Reference
Center.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1990. “Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule (40 CFR
Part 300).” Federal Register 55 (December): 51532–667.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 2015.
“OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigation the Vapor Intrusion Pathway
from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air.” 9200.2-154. Washington, D.C.
Utah Division of Drinking Water. 2019. “Public Drinking Water Source Database.” Salt Lake
City, Utah: Utah Division of Drinking Water.
Utah Division of Water Rights. 2019. “Water Rights Points of Diversion Database, Utah State
Geographic Information Database (GIS) Layer Name:Wrpad.Shp.”
Waddell, K.M., Seiler, R.L., Santini, M, and Solomon, D.K. 1987. Groundwater Conditions in
Salt Lake Valley, Utah 1963-1983 and Predicted Effects of Increased Withdrawals from
Wells. U.S. Geological Survey.
Western Regional Climate Center. n.d. “MIDVALE, UTAH - Climate Summary.” Midvale, Utah
(425610). Accessed April, 30, 2020. https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ut5610
FIGURES
^
UUttaahh
TT
rr
aa
nn
ss
iitt
AA
uu
tt
hh
oo
rr
iitt
yy
RR
aa
iill
LL
iinn
ee
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of EnvironmentalResponse and Remediation
by: Neil B. Taylor Date: 01/31/2019
Figure 1
SITE LOCATION MAPMaple Street Plume
Sa lt Lake County, Utah®^Legend
^Site Location
0.2 0 0.20.1 Miles
^#*
#*#*
#*
#*
Ju st A Car Lot(Matt's Cleaners)
J and J Tires(N orge Dry Cleaning Village)
Tatto o Parlor(D ay-Nite Laundercenter)
U
T
A
H
T
R
A
N
SIT
A
U
T
H
O
RITY
R
AIL
LIN
E
Jo rd an Valley W CD(Planned Background)
Harv's Cleaners
Fashion Cleaners
MS-03
MS-09
MS-05
MS-04
MS-06 & MS-11
Figure 2
SAMPLE LOCATION MAPMaple Street Plume
Midvale, Utah
0 10050Me ters
Sample Locations
#*Soil-Gas Sample Locations
^Contaminated Wells Ü ^
Updated 03/2020
TABLES
7DEOH6DPSOH&ROOHFWLRQ6XPPDU\0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
)LHOG
6DPSOH1R
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU
-XVWD&DU/RWZHVW
0DWW
V&OHDQHUV
6RXWK6WDWH
1RW&ROOHFWHG
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU
-XVWD&DU/RWHDVW
0DWW
V&OHDQHUV
6RXWK6WDWH
1RW&ROOHFWHG
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU
-DQG-7LUH
1RUJH/DXQGU\
6RXWK6WDWH
,GHQWLI\FRQWDPLQDQWVRXUFHDUHDV
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU
:KLWH5DYHQ7DWWRZHVW
'D\1LWH/DXQGHUFHQWHU
6RXWK0DSOH6WUHHW
,GHQWLI\FRQWDPLQDQWVRXUFHDUHDV
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU
:KLWH5DYHQ7DWWRHDVW
'D\1LWH/DXQGHUFHQWHU
6RXWK0DSOH6WUHHW
,GHQWLI\FRQWDPLQDQWVRXUFHDUHDV
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU
-DQG-7LUH6(&RUQHU
1RUJH/DXQGU\
6RXWK6WDWH
5HSODFHPHQW%DFNJURXQG6DPSOH
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU )DVKLRQ&OHDQHUVQRUWK
:HVW&HQWHU ,GHQWLI\FRQWDPLQDQWVRXUFHDUHDV
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU 6RXWK(DVW 1RW&ROOHFWHG
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU )LHOG'XSOLFDWHRI06)LHOG'XSOLFDWH
066RLO*DV 6XPPD&DQLVWHU )DVKLRQ&OHDQHUVVRXWK
:HVW&HQWHU 1RW&ROOHFWHG
06$LU 6XPPD&DQLVWHU 3XULILHGDLUIRUDWULSEODQNVDPSOH 1RW&ROOHFWHG
06*:*URXQGZDWHU P/9LDOV 6RXWK(DVW 1RW&ROOHFWHG
06*:*URXQGZDWHU P/9LDOV
3R%R\]&DUSHW
1RUJH/DXQGU\
6RXWK6WDWH
1RW&ROOHFWHG
06*:*URXQGZDWHU P/9LDOV 7%'1HDU3DUN6WUHHW:HOOV 1RW&ROOHFWHG
06*:*URXQGZDWHU P/9LDOV 1$1RW&ROOHFWHG
0DWUL[&RQWDLQHU /RFDWLRQ 5DWLRQDOH
SITE NAME:Maple Street Plume SITE ID NUMBER:UTN000820949
LOCATION:7610 South Maple Street PROJECT LEADER:Neil Taylor
CITY:Midvale, Utah SAMPLING DATE:
Field Parameters Laboratory Analyses QA/QC Other
Sample
Location Sample Type
Te
m
p
pH Co
n
d
DO Ot
h
e
r
Vo
l
a
t
i
l
e
s
Se
m
i
-
V
o
l
s
Pe
s
t
i
c
i
d
e
s
To
t
.
M
e
t
a
l
s
Cy
a
n
i
d
e
Su
l
f
i
d
e
Am
m
o
n
i
a
NO
3
-
N
O
2
An
i
o
n
s
As
b
e
s
t
o
s
Sp
e
c
.
O
r
g
.
BT
E
X
N
TP
H
O&
G
Ex
p
l
o
s
i
v
e
s
Fi
e
l
d
D
u
p
La
b
D
u
p
Bl
a
n
k
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
Ba
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
MS-01 Soil Gas X X
MS-02 Soil Gas X
MS-03 Soil Gas X
MS-04 Soil Gas X
MS-05 Soil Gas X
MS-06 Soil Gas X
MS-09 Soil Gas X
MS-10 Soil Gas X X
MS-11 Soil Gas X X
MS-12 Soil Gas X
MS-13 Soil Gas X X
MS-GW-01 Groundwater X X
MS-GW-02 Groundwater X
MS-GW-03 Groundwater X X
MS-GW-04 Groundwater X X
MS-GW-05 Groundwater X X
Strikethrough indicates that the sample was Not Collected
Fall 2019
Table 2
Sample Analyses Checklist
Sample Number >>>
Traffic Number >>>
Sample Location >>>
Descriptor >>> CR NCR Res. Com. Background Background
CAS No. Analyte μg/m3 μg/m3 μg/m3 μg/m3 μg/m3 Q μg/m3 Q μg/m3 Q μg/m3 Q μg/m3 Q μg/m3 Q μg/m3 Q
71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane - 5210 174000 730000 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.85 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.09 U
79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.0484 - 2 7 1.37 U 1.37 U 1.37 U 1.37 U 1.37 U 1.37 U 1.37 U
79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.175 0.209 6 26 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.09 U 1.09 U
76-13-1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane - 5210 174000 730000 1.53 U 1.53 U 1.53 U 1.53 U 1.53 U 1.53 U 1.53 U
75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.75 - 59 256 0.802 U 0.802 U 0.80 U 0.80 U 0.80 U 0.80 U 0.80 U
75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethylene - 209 6950 29200 0.793 U 0.793 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 0.79 U
120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene - 2.09 70 292 4.66 U 4.66 U 4.66 U 4.66 U 4.66 U 4.66 U 4.66 U
95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene - 62.6 2090 8760 2.59 2.3 2.22 1.43 0.98 U 0.98 U 0.98 U
106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.005 9.39 0 1 1.54 U 1.54 U 1.54 U 1.54 U 1.54 U 1.54 U 1.54 U
95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene - 209 6950 29200 1.2 U 1.2 U 1.20 U 1.20 U 1.20 U 1.20 U 1.20 U
107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.108 7.30 4 16 0.81 U 0.81 U 0.81 U 0.81 U 0.81 U 0.81 U 0.81 U
78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.759 4.17 25 110 0.924 U 0.924 U 0.92 U 0.92 U 0.92 U 0.92 U 0.92 U
76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane - - - - 1.4 U 1.4 U 1.40 U 1.40 U 1.40 U 1.40 U 1.40 U
108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene - 62.6 2090 8760 0.982 U 0.982 U 0.98 U 0.98 U 0.98 U 0.98 U 0.98 U
106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.0936 2.09 3 14 4.43 U 4.43 U 4.43 U 4.43 U 4.43 U 4.43 U 4.43 U
541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene - - - - 1.2 U 1.2 U 1.20 U 1.20 U 2.46 U 1.20 U 1.20 U
106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.255 834 9 37 1.2 U 1.2 U 1.20 U 1.20 U 1.20 U 1.20 U 1.20 U
123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 0.562 31.3 19 82 0.721 U 0.721 U 0.72 U 0.72 U 0.72 U 0.72 U 0.72 U
540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane - - - - 3.2 3.4 2.54 U 3.06 U 1.87 U 1.27 U 0.93 U
78-93-3 2-Butanone (MEK) - 5210 174000 730000 59 84.9 205 69 66 31 4 U
95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene - - - - 1.03 U 1.03 U 1.03 U 1.03 U 1.03 U 1.03 U 1.03 U
67-63-0 2-Propanol - 209 6950 29200 3.07 U 3.07 U 3.07 U 3.07 U 3.07 U 3.07 U 3.07 U
622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene - - - - 2.48 2.25 2.19 1.35 0.98 U 0.98 U 0.98 U
108-10-1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) - 3130 104000 438000 5.12 U 5.12 U 18 5 U 5 U 5 U 5 U
67-64-1 Acetone - 32200 1070000 4510000 2380 2570 E 3,020 J 1,700 J 1,680 J 687 J 3 U
107-05-1 Allyl chloride 0.468 1.04 16 68 0.626 U 0.626 U 0.63 U 0.63 U 0.63 U 0.63 U 0.63 U
71-43-2 Benzene 0.36 31.3 12 52 4.15 4.38 17.80 9.04 7.38 3.03 0.64 U
100-44-7 Benzyl Chloride 0.0573 1.04 2 8 1.04 U 1.04 U 1.04 U 1.04 U 1.04 U 1.04 U 1.04 U
75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.0759 - 3 11 1.34 U 1.34 U 1.34 U 1.34 U 1.34 U 1.34 U 1.34 U
75-25-2 Bromoform 2.55 - 85 372 6.21 U 6.21 U 6.21 U 6.21 U 6.21 U 6.21 U 6.21 U
74-83-9 Bromomethane - 5.21 174 730 0.776 U 0.776 U 0.78 U 0.78 U 0.78 U 0.78 U 0.78 U
75-15-0 Carbon disulfide - 730 24300 102000 0.622 U 0.622 U 4.61 3.45 1.74 2.01 0.62 U
56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.468 104 16 68 1.26 U 1.26 U 1.26 U 1.26 U 1.26 U 1.26 U 1.26 U
108-90-7 Chlorobenzene - 52.1 1740 7300 0.924 U 0.924 U 0.92 U 0.92 U 0.92 U 0.92 U 0.92 U
75-00-3 Chloroethane - 10400 348000 1460000 0.528 U 0.528 U 0.53 U 0.53 U 0.53 U 0.53 U 0.53 U
67-66-3 Chloroform 0.122 102 4 18 0.973 U 0.973 U 0.97 U 0.97 U 0.97 U 0.97 U 0.97 U
74-87-3 Chloromethane - 93.9 3130 13100 0.843 0.967 1.00 1.85 0.81 0.90 0.41 U
156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene - - - - 0.793 U 0.793 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 23.70 0.79 U
10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - 0.908 U 0.908 U 0.91 U 0.91 U 0.91 U 0.91 U 0.91 U
110-82-7 Cyclohexane - 6260 209000 876000 1.15 1.42 2.14 1.77 1.49 0.82 0.69 U
124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane - - - - 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.70 U 1.70 U 1.70 U 1.70 U 1.70 U
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane - 104 3480 14600 2.45 2.43 2.54 2.51 2.39 2.47 0.99 U
64-17-5 Ethanol - - - - 94.3 108 132 89 85 78 1 U
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 1.12 1040 37 164 2.42 2.02 2.90 1.19 0.87 U 0.87 U 0.87 U
142-82-5 Heptane - 417 13900 58400 3.28 3.99 9.53 3.64 2.97 1.56 0.82 U
87-68-3 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 0.128 - 4 19 6.73 U 6.73 U 6.73 U 6.73 U 6.73 U 6.73 U 6.73 U
98-82-8 Isopropylbenzene - 417 13900 58400 1.18 0.983 U 1.52 0.98 U 0.98 U 0.98 U 0.98 U
1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene - 104 3480 14600 8.54 7.54 8.58 4.51 3.04 1.73 U 1.73 U
591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone - 31.3 1040 4380 9.33 12.6 35 6 5 U 5 U 5 U
80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate - 730 24300 102000 0.819 U 0.819 U 0.82 U 0.82 U 0.82 U 0.82 U 0.82 U
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 101 626 3380 40900 1.3 1.8 1.73 1.59 1.25 2.81 0.69 U
1634-04-4 MTBE 10.8 3130 360 1570 0.721 U 0.721 U 0.72 U 0.72 U 0.72 U 0.72 U 0.72 U
91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.0826 3.13 3 12 3.3 U 3.3 U 3 U 3 U 3 U 3 U 3 U
110-54-3 n-Hexane - 730 24300 102000 4.27 5.22 10.10 9.38 7.40 4.97 0.71 U
95-47-6 o-Xylene - 104 3480 14600 2.9 2.45 2.73 1.38 1.01 0.87 U 0.87 U
115-07-1 Propene - 3130 104000 438000 14.3 19.8 100 73 49 32 1 U
100-42-5 Styrene - 1040 34800 146000 0.851 U 0.851 U 0.91 0.85 U 0.85 U 0.85 U 0.85 U
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 10.8 41.7 360 1570 44.2 5.17 303 1 U 1 U 262 2
109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran - 2090 69500 292000 31 25.7 168 50 15 12 1 U
108-88-3 Toluene - 5210 174000 730000 12.1 11.5 24.10 6.67 6.37 4.93 0.75 U
156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene - 827 - - 0.793 U 0.793 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 0.79 U 0.79 U
10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene - - - - 0.908 U 0.908 U 0.91 U 0.91 U 0.91 U 0.91 U 0.91 U
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 0.478 2.09 16 100 1.07 U 1.07 U 3.68 1.07 U 1.07 U 13.10 1.07 U
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane - 1040 - - 1.3 1.36 1.26 663 38.40 1.40 1.12 U
108-05-4 Vinyl acetate - 209 6950 29200 0.704 U 0.704 U 0.70 U 0.70 U 0.70 U 0.70 U 0.70 U
593-60-2 Vinyl Bromide - - 3 13 0.875 U 0.875 U 0.88 U 0.88 U 0.88 U 0.88 U 0.88 U
75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.168 104 6 93 0.511 U 0.511 U 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.51 U 0.51 U
Q - Data qualifier code
U - Undetected. The sample quantitation limit is provided. In cases where the lab qualifier differed from the validation qualifier, the result is given.
J - The analyte was positively identified; the associated numberical value is the approximate concentration.
VISL - Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels, EPA Vapor Intrusion Calculator Default Settings 3/2020 [Com. - VISL Commercial Air; Res. - VISL Residential Air; Target Sub-Slab and Near-source Soil Gas Concentraion]
SCDM - Superfund Chemical Data Matrix Subsurface Intrusion Component Benchmark Values 02/2020 [CR - Cancer Risk; NCR - Noncancer Risk]
VISL & SCMD values provided utilize a TCR = 1E-06 and THQ = 1
A shaded value represents a concentration at least three times background or, when the background measurement is undetected (U), the sample equals or exceeds the sample
quantitation limit. These concentrations qualify as "Observed Releases".
A bold red value indicates that the measured concentration is equal to or greater than at least one of the benchmark values, either VISL or SCDM.Note that all values provided are in μg/m3.
soil gas soil gas soil gas soil gas soil gas
L1159345-07
Superfund Chemical Data
Matrix (SCDM)
Concentrations
Vapor Intrusion Screening
Level (VISL)
Concentrations
J and J Tire SE
Corner
J and J Tire SE
Corner Duplicate J and J Tire
White Raven
Tattoo Parking
Lot Southwest
Corner
White Raven
Tattoo Parking
Lot Southeast
Corner
Fashion Cleaners Trip Blank
L1159345-02 L1159345-03 L1159345-01 L1159345-04 L1159345-05 L1159345-06
Table 3
Soil Gas - Summary of Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations
Maple Street Plume
MS-06 MS-11 MS-03 MS-04 MS-05 MS-09 Blank
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8
Problem Statement Identifying the Study Goals Decision Inputs Study Boundaries Analytical Approach Decisions Rules
Performance or
Acceptance
Criteria
Plan for
Obtaining Data
Chlorinated solvent
contamination has been
identified as present in the
Midvale City Municipal
Park Street (Cold) Well.
The contributors of this
contamination have not
been determined. The depth
to shallow groundwater
eliminates the possibility of
identifying sources and
tracking the flow of
contamination through the
groundwater..
Identify contamination contributors
through soil-gas sampling of
historical and current dry cleaners
upgradient and side gradient of the
Site.
Polk directories from 1960 to
1990 identified the historical
location of dry cleaners. Soil-gas
sampling will identify areas of
chlorinated solvent
contamination. Additional indoor
and subslab sampling may be
necessary as a next step if
contamination is detected above
100 µg/m3 to determine if vapor
intrusion of the solvents are
exposing workers or residents
above SCDM screening
benchmarks.
Soil-gas samples will be
collected from all historical
or current dry cleaner
locations within 2,000 feet
upgradient or side-gradient
of the Site. A background
sample will be collected far
enough upgradient of the
sources to not be affected by
contaminated soils.
Soil-gas samples will be
collected in evacuated
Summa canisters and
analysed at a CLP laboratory
using EPA method TO-15. A
background and trip blank
samples will also be
collected and analysed.
Judgmental sampling will
be used to bias samples
toward more potentially
contaminated areas.
Statistical sampling will
not be used, and the
tolerance limits on
decision errors will not be
calculated.
Sampling will be
conducted according
to methods outlined in
the DERR Quality
Assurance Program
Plan for
Environmental Data
Operations (QAPP) of
November 2018 and
other relevant EPA
guidance documents.
All analytical data
will be reviewed,
verified and receive
CLP Level 4
validation to ensure
data are acceptable for
the intended use.
An EPA contractor
will collect soil-gas
samples from
historical dry cleaner
properties that
provide sample
access. The
contractor will
operate a direct-push
well drilling
equipment and
collected the
samples. Boreholes
will be installed to a
depth of six feet
below ground
surface. Samples
will be collected
over a 24-hour
period.
Table 4
Data Quality Objectives N. Taylor, 2019
APPENDIX A
FIELD ACTIVITIES REPORT
Maple Street Plume
Field Activities Report
November 8, 2019
On November 7 and 8, 2019 Neil Taylor sampled properties in Midvale Utah associated with the Porter
Lane TCE site. Joseph Rudi, Erik Hastall, and Kelly Wooten operated the sampling equipment as
employees of Weston Environmental. A direct-push unit drove a drive point to a depth of from six feet to
seven feet below ground surface (bgs). The drive point was then extracted and sand was added to bring
the depth of the boring to six feet bgs. A screened collection port was connected to Tygon tubing and
lowered into the hole. The hole was backfilled with sand and sealed with a bentonite/water mixture. The
holes were then evacuated using a photoionization detector (PID). The tubing was connected to a Summa
canister under a 25-inch Hg vacuum equipped with a flow regulator set to collect a constant flow for an
approximate 24-hour time-weighted sample. The sampling was stopped when the vacuum reached below
five inches Hg.
Soil gas sample MS-01 was not collected from 7565 South State (Just a Car Lot) because the property
owner withdrew sampling permission on November 6, 2019. The property owner (Chip Palmer) indicated
that a 2008 environmental investigation of his property possibly would document that a cleaner did not
exist on his property in 1960 as indicated in the Polk Directory.
Background soil gas sample MS-10 was not collected from 176 East Forbush because of a sample
location mixup resulting in the property not being screened for utilities. It is hoped that MS-06 can be
used as a background sample.
All soil gas samples were turned off at about 9:30 the morning of November 8, 2019 at a pressure of less
than five inches Hg with the exception of the duplicate soil gas sample MS-06 that was allowed to
continue until ?
An attempt to sample groundwater was made at J and J Tires (7615 South State Street). This property was
identified as “Po Boys Carpet” in the sample plan but the company changed. A boring was made to 30
feet bgs without encountering groundwater of any kind. This supports well drilling records on file at the
Utah Division of Water Rights that indicate that the shallow groundwater table is located from 35 to 70
feet bgs, a depth that cannot be reached with this drilling rig. No further attempts were made to sample
groundwater.
Figure 1: J and J Tire (7615 South State) Back (East) Door
The soil gas sample MS-03 was begun at 11:25 near the rear (east) door of the building. Enough air will
be collected for this sample to serve as the laboratory duplicate. Figure 2 shows the sample location and
the screen sample inlet that was placed at the bottom of each boring. The PID had readings of up to 1,200
ppb as air from the sample hole was evacuated.
Figure 2: Soil Gas Sample Collection Inlet at J and J Tire Sample Location
Figure 3 is another picture of the equipment used to install the soil gas samples at the rear door of 7615
South State Street.
Figure 3: J and J Tire Soil Gas Sample Location at Back (East) Door
MS-06 was installed at the southeast corner of 7615 South State Street. A second sample was also
collected from this location as a field duplicate. It was hoped that MS-06 could serve as a background
sample as the sample location is approximately 80 feet uphill and upgradient from the back door of J and
J Tires; however, the PID registered 800 ppb at 11:56 as the hole was evacuated.
Figure 4: J and J Tire Soil Gas Sample Location at Parking Lot Southeast Corner
Sample MS-04 was collected from the White Raven Tattoo north parking lot at 7692 South Maple Street.
Sampling began at 12:53 near a trash dumpster.
Figure 5: White Raven Tattoo (7692 South Maple Street) North Parking Lot Sample MS-04
Sample MS-05 was collected from the Northeast corner of White Raven Tattoo in the parking lot.
Sampling began at 13:25.
Figure 6: White Raven Tattoo (7692 South Maple Street) North Parking Lot Sample MS-05
Sample MS-09 was collected near the south entrance of Fashion Cleaners located at 118 West Center
Street. The PID registered 40,000 ppb as the hole was evacuated. A second sample (MS-12) was planned
for the northwest corner of Fashion Cleaners; however, utilities were unexpendedly located along the
entire west side of Fashion Cleaners and sample MS-12 could not be collected.
Figure 7: Fashion Cleaners (118 West Center) South Parking Lot
APPENDIX B
CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO PROPERTY FORM
CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO PROPERTY
Maple Street Plume, CERCLIS ID# UTN000820949
Midvale, Utah
Name of Owner:
Address of Owner:
Address of Property Subject to Access:
Property Owner Telephone Number: ______________________________
Property Owner Email Address:_____________________
A. I, the authorized representative of the owner of the property described above
(“Owner”), consent to officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, and other authorized
representatives of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality (“UDEQ”) entering and having continued access to the
above referenced (“Property”) for the following purposes:
1. Conducting field inspections and investigations;
2. Drilling two, small-diameter holes using direct-push equipment, as needed for
soil-gas sampling; and
3. Other such actions as may be necessary to protect human health and the
environment.
B. Owner understands that these actions by EPA and UDEQ are undertaken pursuant
to their response and enforcement responsibilities under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq.
Notwithstanding any provision of this Consent for Access, the UDEQ and EPA retain all of their
access authorities and rights, as well as all of their rights to require land/water use restrictions,
including enforcement authorities related thereto, under CERCLA, RCRA and any other
applicable federal or State statute or regulation. EPA, UDEQ, and Owner recognize that
granting access does not constitute an admission of liability under CERCLA, RCRA, and any
other applicable federal or State statute or regulation. EPA, UDEQ, and Owner retain all rights
and defenses under CERCLA, RCRA, and any other applicable federal or State statute or
regulation. Liability for damage caused by negligence is governed by applicable law. Nothing
in this Consent for Access constitutes a waiver of sovereign immunity.
C. The undersigned certifies that he/she is fully authorized to grant the access
provided herein on behalf of Owner and to execute and legally bind Owner to this document.
1
Section 19-6-304 of the Utah Code Ann. provides that, upon request as indicated
below, the Owner may have a split sample if possible and may obtain an analysis of the sample
available. To these ends, please mark your preference below:
[ ] I wish to obtain splits of all samples collected on the Property and a receipt
describing each sample taken. I understand that I must provide the necessary
sample containers to obtain these splits. The responsibility of choosing an
analytical laboratory and the cost of analysis of the splits is solely mine.
[ ] When available to UDEQ, Owner wishes to obtain a copy of the final analytical
results report and laboratory data concerning the samples taken from the Property.
Indicate address where results should be sent to: __________________________.
Authorized Signature:
Print Name:
Date:
Site Name: Maple Street Plume Project Manager: Neil B. Taylor
2
APPENDIX C
WESTON SOLUTIONS
MAPLE STREET PLUME TRIP REPORT AND
DATA VALIDATION REPORTS
R
R
R
ds>/d/KEZWKZd
DĂƉůĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚWůƵŵĞ
^DW>>/sZz'ZKhW͗>ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱ
WƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ
Dy
ϭϮϮϲϵĂƐƚsĂƐƐĂƌƌŝǀĞ
ƵƌŽƌĂ͕KϴϬϬϭϰ
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
/͘/EdZKhd/KE
dĂƐŬKƌĚĞƌdŝƚůĞ͗DĂƉůĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚWůƵŵĞ
ŽŶƚƌĂĐƚdĂƐŬKƌĚĞƌ͗ϮϬϰϬϴ͘ϬϭϮ͘ϬϬϰ͘Ϭϳϰϯ͘ϬϬ
^ĂŵƉůĞĞůŝǀĞƌLJ'ƌŽƵƉ͗>ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱ
WWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͗ZLJĂŶƵŶŚĂŵ
tĞƐƚŽŶWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͗ZŽLJtĞŝŶĚŽƌĨ
dEŽ͗͘ϬϬϬϰͬϭϵϭϬͲϬϭ
DĂƚƌŝdž͗ŝƌ
Y>ĞǀĞů͗^ƚĂŐĞϮ
EŽ͘ŽĨ^ĂŵƉůĞƐ͗ϳ
EŽ͘ŽĨZĞĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐͬŝůƵƚŝŽŶƐ͗Ϭ
>ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ͗WĂĐĞŶĂůLJƚŝĐĂů
dĂďůĞϭ͘^ĂŵƉůĞ/ĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
>W/>Ăď^ĂŵƉůĞEĂŵĞ DĂƚƌŝdždLJƉĞ ŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶĂƚĞ DĞƚŚŽĚ
D^ͲϬϯ >ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱͲϬϭ ϭϭͬϬϴͬϮϬϭϵϬϵ͗ϰϱ dKͲϭϱ
D^ͲϬϰ >ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱͲϬϰ ϭϭͬϬϴͬϮϬϭϵϬϵ͗ϯϲ dKͲϭϱ
D^ͲϬϱ >ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱͲϬϱ ϭϭͬϬϴͬϮϬϭϵϬϵ͗ϯϳ dKͲϭϱ
D^ͲϬϲ >ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱͲϬϮ ϭϭͬϬϴͬϮϬϭϵϬϵ͗ϰϳ dKͲϭϱ
D^ͲϬϵ >ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱͲϬϲ ϭϭͬϬϴͬϮϬϭϵϬϵ͗ϱϳ dKͲϭϱ
D^Ͳϭϭ >ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱͲϬϯ ϭϭͬϬϴͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗ϱϬ dKͲϭϱ
dZ/W>E<ͲϬϭ >ϭϭϱϵϯϰϱͲϬϳ ϭϭͬϬϴͬϮϬϭϵϭϭ͗ϱϬ dKͲϭϱ
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
//͘^ĂŵƉůĞDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
ŶŽŵĂůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚƐĂŵƉůĞŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂƌĞ ŶŽƚĞĚ ďĞůŽǁ͘dŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐǁĞƌĞƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚĂƚĂŵďŝĞŶƚƚĞŵƉĞƌĂƚƵƌĞ
ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŵĞƚŚŽĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞĐĂƐĞŶĂƌƌĂƚŝǀĞĂŶĚĐŽŽůĞƌƌĞĐĞŝƉƚĨŽƌŵ͕ƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐ
ǁĞƌĞƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚŝŶŐŽŽĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞĐŚĂŝŶͲŽĨͲĐƵƐƚŽĚLJ;KͿǁĂƐ ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞůLJƐŝŐŶĞĚĂŶĚĚĂƚĞĚďLJĨŝĞůĚ
ĂŶĚůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJƉĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů͘
dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ ŝƐƐƵĞƐ ǁĞƌĞ ŶŽƚĞĚ͗
x dŚĞůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ͛ƐĐŽŽůĞƌƌĞĐĞŝƉƚĨŽƌŵŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚŶŽĐƵƐƚŽĚLJƐĞĂůƐ ǁĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚŽŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ
ƐŚŝƉƉŝŶŐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞƌ͘
x dŚĞKŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚĂ ƚƌŝƉďůĂŶŬǁĂƐŶŽƚƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ŽŶĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ
ƐĂŵƉůĞƐǁĂƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ ĂƐdƌŝƉůĂŶŬͲϬϭ͘͟
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
ĂƚĂYƵĂůŝĨŝĞƌZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞdĂďůĞ
YƵĂůŝĨŝĞƌ KƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ /ŶŽƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ
h dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞǁĂƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĨŽƌ͕ďƵƚ
ǁĂƐŶŽƚĚĞƚĞĐƚĞĚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞ
ƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƐĂŵƉůĞƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶůŝŵŝƚ͘
dŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǀĂůƵĞŝƐƚŚĞ
ƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶůŝŵŝƚŽƌƚŚĞĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚ
ĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶůŝŵŝƚĨŽƌĚŝŽdžŝŶƐŽƌW
ĐŽŶŐĞŶĞƌƐ͘
dŚĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůǁĂƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĨŽƌ͕ďƵƚǁĂƐ
ŶŽƚĚĞƚĞĐƚĞĚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨƚŚĞ
ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǀĂůƵĞ͘dŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǀĂůƵĞŝƐ
ĞŝƚŚĞƌƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶůŝŵŝƚŽƌ
ƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶůŝŵŝƚ͘dŚĞ
ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǀĂůƵĞŝƐƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶ
ůŝŵŝƚŽƌƚŚĞƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶůŝŵŝƚĨŽƌ
ƉĞƌĐŚůŽƌĂƚĞŽŶůLJ͘
:dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞǁĂƐƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ͖
ƚŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŶƵŵĞƌŝĐĂůǀĂůƵĞŝƐƚŚĞ
ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ĂŶĂůLJƚĞŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ͘
dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞǁĂƐƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ͖
ƚŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŶƵŵĞƌŝĐĂůǀĂůƵĞŝƐƚŚĞ
ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ĂŶĂůLJƚĞŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ͘
:н EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞǁĂƐƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ͖
ƚŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŶƵŵĞƌŝĐĂůǀĂůƵĞŝƐƚŚĞ
ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ĂŶĂůLJƚĞŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ͕ĂŶĚŵĂLJŚĂǀĞĂ
ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞďŝĂƐ͘
:Ͳ EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞǁĂƐƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ͖ƚŚĞ
ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŶƵŵĞƌŝĐĂůǀĂůƵĞŝƐƚŚĞ
ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ĂŶĂůLJƚĞŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ͕ĂŶĚŵĂLJŚĂǀĞĂ
ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞďŝĂƐ͘
h:dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞǁĂƐŶŽƚĚĞĞŵĞĚĂďŽǀĞ
ƚŚĞƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƐĂŵƉůĞƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ
ůŝŵŝƚ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ƚŚĞƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚ
ƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶůŝŵŝƚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞ
ĂŶĚŵĂLJŽƌŵĂLJŶŽƚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŚĞ
ĂĐƚƵĂůůŝŵŝƚŽĨƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ
ƚŽĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞůLJĂŶĚƉƌĞĐŝƐĞůLJŵĞĂƐƵƌĞ
ƚŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ͘
dŚĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůǁĂƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĨŽƌ͕ďƵƚǁĂƐ
ŶŽƚĚĞƚĞĐƚĞĚ͘dŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǀĂůƵĞŝƐĂŶ
ĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĂŶĚŵĂLJďĞŝŶĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞŽƌ
ŝŵƉƌĞĐŝƐĞ͘
E dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞ
ŽĨĂŶĂŶĂůLJƚĞĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞƌĞŝƐ
ƉƌĞƐƵŵƉƚŝǀĞĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞƚŽŵĂŬĞĂ
ΗƚĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘Η
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
YƵĂůŝĨŝĞƌ KƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ /ŶŽƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ
E:dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞ
ŽĨĂŶĂŶĂůLJƚĞƚŚĂƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶ
ΗƚĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚΗĂŶĚƚŚĞ
ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŶƵŵĞƌŝĐĂůǀĂůƵĞ
ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐŝƚƐĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞ
ĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘
Z dŚĞĚĂƚĂĂƌĞƵŶƵƐĂďůĞ͘dŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ
ƌĞƐƵůƚƐĂƌĞƌĞũĞĐƚĞĚĚƵĞƚŽƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ
ĚĞĨŝĐŝĞŶĐŝĞƐŝŶƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĂŶĂůLJnjĞ
ƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞĂŶĚƚŽ ŵĞĞƚƋƵĂůŝƚLJ
ĐŽŶƚƌŽůĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘dŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽƌ
ĂďƐĞŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞĂŶĂůLJƚĞĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞ
ǀĞƌŝĨŝĞĚ͘
dŚĞĚĂƚĂĂƌĞƵŶƵƐĂďůĞ͘dŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ
ƌĞƐƵůƚƐĂƌĞƌĞũĞĐƚĞĚĚƵĞƚŽƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ
ĚĞĨŝĐŝĞŶĐŝĞƐŝŶƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĂŶĂůLJnjĞƚŚĞ
ƐĂŵƉůĞĂŶĚƚŽŵĞĞƚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĐŽŶƚƌŽů
ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘dŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽƌĂďƐĞŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞ
ĂŶĂůLJƚĞĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞǀĞƌŝĨŝĞĚ͘
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
YƵĂůŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĚĞZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ dĂďůĞ
YƵĂůŝĨŝĞƌ KƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ /ŶŽƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ
,,ŽůĚŝŶŐƚŝŵĞƐǁĞƌĞĞdžĐĞĞĚĞĚ͘,ŽůĚŝŶŐƚŝŵĞƐǁĞƌĞĞdžĐĞĞĚĞĚ͘
^^ƵƌƌŽŐĂƚĞƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJǁĂƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞY
ůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
dŚĞƐĞƋƵĞŶĐĞŽƌŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
ƵƐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĐĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐŝŶĐŽƌƌĞĐƚ
ĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶйZ^ŽƌйǁĂƐ
ŶŽŶĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚ͘
ŽƌƌĞůĂƚŝŽŶĐŽĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚŝƐфϬ͘ϵϵϱŽƌ
ĐĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐŶŽŶĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚ͘
Z ĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶZZ&ǁĂƐфϬ͘Ϭϱ͘йZĨŽƌĐĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŶŽƚǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŶƚƌŽů
ůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
WƌĞƐƵŵĞĚĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚďLJ
ƚŚĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ;ŵĞƚŚŽĚͿďůĂŶŬƌĞƐƵůƚƐ͘
WƌĞƐƵŵĞĚĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚďLJ
ƚŚĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ;ŵĞƚŚŽĚͿŽƌĐĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶ
ďůĂŶŬƌĞƐƵůƚƐ͘
>>ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJůĂŶŬ^ƉŝŬĞͬůĂŶŬ^ƉŝŬĞ
ƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞйZǁĂƐŶŽƚǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŶƚƌŽů
ůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
>ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJŽŶƚƌŽů^ĂŵƉůĞйZǁĂƐŶŽƚ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
>ϭ >^ͬ>^ZWǁĂƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘>^ͬ>^ZWǁĂƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
Y D^ͬD^ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJǁĂƐƉŽŽƌ͘D^ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJǁĂƐƉŽŽƌ͘
Yϭ D^ͬD^ZWǁĂƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘D^ͬD^ZWǁĂƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘ƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞƐƐŚŽǁĞĚƉŽŽƌĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ͘
//ŶƚĞƌŶĂůƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞǁĂƐ
ƵŶƐĂƚŝƐĨĂĐƚŽƌLJ͘
/W/^ƌĞƐƵůƚƐǁĞƌĞƵŶƐĂƚŝƐĨĂĐƚŽƌLJ͘
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘/W^ĞƌŝĂůŝůƵƚŝŽŶйǁĞƌĞŶŽƚǁŝƚŚŝŶ
ĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
D dƵŶŝŶŐ;&Žƌ&dWWͿǁĂƐ
ŶŽŶĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚ͘
/WD^ƚƵŶĞǁĂƐŶŽƚĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚ͘
d WƌĞƐƵŵĞĚĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚďLJ
ƚŚĞƚƌŝƉďůĂŶŬƌĞƐƵůƚƐ͘
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘
н &ĂůƐĞƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞʹ ƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚĐŽŵƉŽƵŶĚǁĂƐ
ŶŽƚƉƌĞƐĞŶƚ͘
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘
Ͳ &ĂůƐĞŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞʹ ĐŽŵƉŽƵŶĚǁĂƐƉƌĞƐĞŶƚ
ďƵƚŶŽƚƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚ͘
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘
&WƌĞƐƵŵĞĚĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚďLJ
ƚŚĞ&ŽƌZƌĞƐƵůƚƐ͘
WƌĞƐƵŵĞĚĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚďLJ
ƚŚĞ&ŽƌZƌĞƐƵůƚƐ͘
&ϭ &ŝĞůĚĚƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐǁĞƌĞŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞ
ĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚ͘
&ŝĞůĚĚƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐǁĞƌĞŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞ
ĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚ͘
Ψ ZĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƌĞƐƵůƚŽƌŽƚŚĞƌŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ǁĂƐŝŶĐŽƌƌĞĐƚ͘
ZĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƌĞƐƵůƚŽƌŽƚŚĞƌŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ǁĂƐŝŶĐŽƌƌĞĐƚ͘
͍d/ŝĚĞŶƚŝƚLJŽƌƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƌĞƚĞŶƚŝŽŶƚŝŵĞ
ŚĂƐďĞĞŶĐŚĂŶŐĞĚ͘
EŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
YƵĂůŝĨŝĞƌ KƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ /ŶŽƌŐĂŶŝĐƐ
dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐǁŝƚŚƚŚŝƐĨůĂŐƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞ
ƵƐĞĚďĞĐĂƵƐĞĂŶŽƚŚĞƌŵŽƌĞƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůůLJ
ƐŽƵŶĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͘
dŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐǁŝƚŚƚŚŝƐĨůĂŐƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞ
ƵƐĞĚďĞĐĂƵƐĞĂŶŽƚŚĞƌŵŽƌĞƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůůLJ
ƐŽƵŶĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͘
W /ŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞĨŽƌƉĞƐƚŝĐŝĚĞƐ
ǁĂƐƉŽŽƌ͘
WŽƐƚŝŐĞƐƚŝŽŶ^ƉŝŬĞƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJǁĂƐŶŽƚ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
Ύ//͕Ύ///hŶƵƐƵĂůƉƌŽďůĞŵƐĨŽƵŶĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĚĂƚĂ
ƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ//͕
Η^ĂŵƉůĞDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ΗŽƌ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ///͕
ΗDĞƚŚŽĚŶĂůLJƐĞƐ͘ΗdŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌ
ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƐƚĞƌŝƐŬ;ΎͿǁŝůůŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĞ
ƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŚĞƌĞĂĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ƉƌŽďůĞŵĐĂŶďĞĨŽƵŶĚ͘
hŶƵƐƵĂůƉƌŽďůĞŵƐĨŽƵŶĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĚĂƚĂ
ƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ//͕
Η^ĂŵƉůĞDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ΗŽƌ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ///͕
ΗDĞƚŚŽĚŶĂůLJƐĞƐ͘ΗdŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌ
ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƐƚĞƌŝƐŬ;ΎͿǁŝůůŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĞ
ƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŚĞƌĞĂĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ
ƉƌŽďůĞŵĐĂŶďĞĨŽƵŶĚ͘
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
///͘DĞƚŚŽĚŶĂůLJƐĞƐ
$(3$0(7+2'72²9RODWLOH2UJDQLF&RPSRXQGV92&VLQ$LU
ZĞǀŝĞǁĞĚLJ͗͘tĞƐƐůŝŶŐ
ĂƚĞZĞǀŝĞǁĞĚ͗ĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭϳ͕ϮϬϭϵ
dŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐůŝƐƚĞĚŝŶdĂďůĞϭĨŽƌƚŚŝƐ ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐǁĞƌĞǀĂůŝĚĂƚĞĚďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ YƵĂůŝƚLJ
ƐƐƵƌĂŶĐĞWƌŽũĞĐƚWůĂŶĨŽƌh͘^͘WZĞŐŝŽŶϴZ>^ŝƚĞƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ;ϳͬϭϯͿ͕WŽŵƉĞŶĚŝƵŵDĞƚŚŽĚdKͲ
ϭϱ ĂŶĚ EĂƚŝŽŶĂů&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂů'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌKƌŐĂŶŝĐ^ƵƉĞƌĨƵŶĚDĞƚŚŽĚƐĂƚĂZĞǀŝĞǁ;:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϮϬϭϳͿ͘
x ,ŽůĚŝŶŐdŝŵĞƐ͗dŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐǁĞƌĞĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶϯϬĚĂLJƐŽĨĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘
x 'ͬD^dƵŶŝŶŐ͗dŚĞ&ƚƵŶĞƐŵĞƚƚŚĞŵĞƚŚŽĚĂďƵŶĚĂŶĐĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘^ĂŵƉůĞƐǁĞƌĞĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶ
ϮϰŚŽƵƌƐŽĨƚŚĞ&ŝŶũĞĐƚŝŽŶƚŝŵĞ͘
x ĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶ͗ĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶŝƐŶŽƚĂƌĞǀŝĞǁĞůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĂ^ƚĂŐĞϮǀĂůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
x ůĂŶŬƐ͗dŚĞŵĞƚŚŽĚďůĂŶŬ ŚĂĚĚĞƚĞĐƚƐĨŽƌďĞŶnjLJůĐŚůŽƌŝĚĞ;Ϭ͘ϭϰϭƉƉďǀͿ͕ϭ͕ϮͲĚŝĐŚůŽƌŽďĞŶnjĞŶĞ;Ϭ͘Ϭϳϯϲ
ƉƉďǀͿ͕ϭ͕ϯͲĚŝĐŚůŽƌŽďĞŶnjĞŶĞ;Ϭ͘ϭϬϮƉƉďǀͿ͕ϭ͕ϰͲĚŝĐŚůŽƌŽďĞŶnjĞŶĞ;Ϭ͘ϭϯϳƉƉďǀͿ͕ŶͲŚĞdžĂŶĞ;Ϭ͘ϭϳϮƉƉďǀͿ͕
ƉƌŽƉĞŶĞ;Ϭ͘Ϯϰϵ ƉƉďǀͿ͕ ϭ͕Ϯ͕ϰͲƚƌŝĐŚůŽƌŽďĞŶnjĞŶĞ ;Ϭ͘ϭϲϳ ƉƉďǀͿ ĂŶĚ Ϯ͕Ϯ͕ϰͲƚƌŝŵĞƚŚLJůƉĞŶƚĂŶĞ ;Ϭ͘ϭϮϳ
ƉƉďǀͿ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĞĚĚĞƚĞĐƚƐĨŽƌϮ͕Ϯ͕ϰͲdƌŝŵĞƚŚLJůƉĞŶƚĂŶĞŝŶƐĂŵƉůĞƐD^ͲϬϯ͕D^ͲϬϰ͕D^ͲϬϱĂŶĚD^ͲϬϵ
ĂŶĚϭ͕ϯͲĚŝĐŚůŽƌŽďĞŶnjĞŶĞ ŝŶ ƐĂŵƉůĞ D^ͲϬϱ ǁĞƌĞ ƋƵĂůŝĨŝĞĚ ĂƐ ŶŽŶĚĞƚĞĐƚƐ ;hͿ Ăƚ ƚŚĞ ůĞǀĞů ŽĨ
ĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂƐƚŚĞĚĞƚĞĐƚƐŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐǁĞƌĞůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϱп ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ ŝŶƚŚĞŵĞƚŚŽĚ
ďůĂŶŬ͘
x ^ƵƌƌŽŐĂƚĞZĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ͗^ƵƌƌŽŐĂƚĞƐƌĞĐŽǀĞƌŝĞƐǁĞƌĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJYůŝŵŝƚƐŽĨϲϬͲϭϰϬй͘
x ůĂŶŬ ^ƉŝŬĞƐ ĂŶĚ >ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ ŽŶƚƌŽů ^ĂŵƉůĞƐ͗ůů >^ ĂŶĚ >^ ƌĞĐŽǀĞƌŝĞƐ ǁĞƌĞ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ
ůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJYůŝŵŝƚƐŽĨϳϬͲϭϯϬйĂŶĚĂůůZWƐǁĞƌĞǁŝƚŚŝŶϮϱй͘ZĞĐŽǀĞƌŝĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞ>^ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ
ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞƌĞĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐŽĨĂĐĞƚŽŶĞĂŶĚƚƌŝĐŚůŽƌŽĨůƵŽƌŽŵĞƚŚĂŶĞǁĞƌĞǁŝƚŚŝŶϳϬͲϭϯϬйƌĞĐŽǀĞƌLJ͘
x DĂƚƌŝdž^ƉŝŬĞͬDĂƚƌŝdž^ƉŝŬĞƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞ͗D^ͬD^ĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƚŽƚŚŝƐŵĞƚŚŽĚ͘
x >ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ ƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞ͗ůƚŚŽƵŐŚĂůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJĚƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞǁĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĨŽƌƐĂŵƉůĞD^ͲϬϯŽŶƚŚĞĐŚĂŝŶ
ŽĨĐƵƐƚŽĚLJ͕ůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJĚƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƐŝƚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐ͘
x &ŝĞůĚY^ĂŵƉůĞƐ͗&ŝĞůĚYƐĂŵƉůĞƐǁĞƌĞĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚŝĨŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ͕ƋƵĂůŝĨŝĞĚďĂƐĞĚŽŶŵĞƚŚŽĚ
ďůĂŶŬƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJYƌĞƐƵůƚƐĂĨĨĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƵƐĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞĨŝĞůĚYĚĂƚĂ͘ŶLJƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐ
ĚĞƚĞĐƚƐǁĞƌĞƵƐĞĚƚŽĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞ ƚŚĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚƐŝƚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƐ͘&ŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂƌĞĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚ
ĨŝĞůĚYƐĂŵƉůĞƐ͗
R dƌŝƉ ůĂŶŬƐ͗^ĂŵƉůĞdƌŝƉůĂŶŬͲϬϭǁĂƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚĂƐƚŚĞƚƌŝƉďůĂŶŬĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ
DĞƚŚŽĚdKͲϭϱƐĂŵƉůĞĂŶĂůLJƐĞƐ͘dŚĞƚƌŝƉďůĂŶŬŚĂĚĂĚĞƚĞĐƚĨŽƌƚĞƚƌĂĐŚůŽƌŽĞƚŚLJůĞŶĞ;Ϯ͘ϯϰ
ђŐͬŵϯͿ͘ůůƐĂŵƉůĞĚĞƚĞĐƚƐĨŽƌƚĞƚƌĂĐŚůŽƌŽĞƚŚLJůĞŶĞǁĞƌĞŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶϱпƚŚĞĂŵŽƵŶƚŝŶƚŚĞ
3URMHFW0DSOH6WUHHW3OXPH
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*/
5HYLVLRQ
ƚƌŝƉďůĂŶŬǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĞdžĐĞƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƐĂŵƉůĞD^Ͳϭϭ͘dĞƚƌĂĐŚůŽƌŽĞƚŚLJůĞŶĞŝŶƐĂŵƉůĞD^ͲϭϭǁĂƐ
ƋƵĂůŝĨŝĞĚ ĂƐĂŶŽŶĚĞƚĞĐƚ;hͿĂƚƚŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘
R &ŝĞůĚůĂŶŬƐ ĂŶĚƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚůĂŶŬƐ͗dŚŝƐ^'ŚĂĚŶŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚĨŝĞůĚŽƌĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚďůĂŶŬƐ͘
R &ŝĞůĚƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞƐ͗&ŝĞůĚĚƵƉůŝĐĂƚĞ ƐĂŵƉůĞƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚ ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐ^'͘
x /ŶƚĞƌŶĂů^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͗/ŶƚĞƌŶĂůƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƌĞĐŽǀĞƌŝĞƐǁĞƌĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞDĞƚŚŽĚdKͲϭϱĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŵŝƚƐŽĨ
цϰϬй͘
x ŽŵƉŽƵŶĚ/ĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ZĞǀŝĞǁŝƐŶŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞĂƚĂ^ƚĂŐĞϮǀĂůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶůĞǀĞů͘dŚĞůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ
ĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĨŽƌϲϳ ǀŽůĂƚŝůĞƚĂƌŐĞƚĐŽŵƉŽƵŶĚƐďLJDĞƚŚŽĚdKͲϭϱ͘
x ŽŵƉŽƵŶĚYƵĂŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚZĞƉŽƌƚĞĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶ>ŝŵŝƚƐ͗sĞƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĐŽŵƉŽƵŶĚƋƵĂŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ
ŝƐŶŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞĂƚĂ^ƚĂŐĞϮǀĂůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶůĞǀĞů͘dŚĞůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƚŚĞDĞƚŚŽĚdKͲϭϱƚĂƌŐĞƚ
ĐŽŵƉŽƵŶĚƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶƵŶŝƚƐŽĨђŐͬŵϯ ŝŶƚŚĞ͕ĂůƚŚŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐǁĞƌĞƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶƵŶŝƚƐŽĨƉƉďǀ
ŽŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƌĞƐƵůƚĨŽƌŵƐ͘dŚĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞƌŶŽƚĞĚƌĞƐƵůƚƐďĞůŽǁƚŚĞƌĞƉŽƌƚŝŶŐůŝŵŝƚǁĞƌĞŶŽƚƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚ
ďLJƚŚĞůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ͖ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚŶŽŶĚĞƚĞĐƚƐĂƌĞǀĂůŝĚƚŽƚŚĞƌĞƉŽƌƚŝŶŐůŝŵŝƚ͘
^ĂŵƉůĞD^ͲϬϲǁĂƐƌĞĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĂƚĂϮϬп ĚŝůƵƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƐĂŵƉůĞD^ͲϬϰǁĂƐĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĂƚĂϭϬп ĚŝůƵƚŝŽŶƚŽ
ƌĞƉŽƌƚ ĂĐĞƚŽŶĞĂŶĚƚƌŝĐŚůŽƌŽĨůƵŽƌŽŵĞƚŚĂŶĞ͕ƌĞƐƉĞĐƚŝǀĞůLJ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞůŝŶĞĂƌƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƚŚĞĐĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ZĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐƌĞƐƵůƚƐǁĞƌĞƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƵŶĚŝůƵƚĞĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽĨƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞ͘
ĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJĨůĂŐƐŽŶƚŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐƵŵŵĂƌŝĞƐ͕ƌĞƐƵůƚƐĨŽƌĂĐĞƚŽŶĞ ŝŶƐĂŵƉůĞƐD^Ͳ
Ϭϯ͕D^Ͳϭϭ͕D^ͲϬϰ͕D^ͲϬϱĂŶĚD^ͲϬϵǁĞƌĞƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞůŝŶĞĂƌƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƚŚĞĐĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞ
ƐĂŵƉůĞƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚƌĞĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚĂƚĂĚŝůƵƚŝŽŶ͖ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐĨŽƌĂĐĞƚŽŶĞ ǁĞƌĞƋƵĂůŝĨŝĞĚĂƐ
ĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚ;:Ϳ͘
x dĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞůLJ/ĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŽŵƉŽƵŶĚƐ͗d/ƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJĨŽƌƚŚĞ ƐĂŵƉůĞƐ ŝŶƚŚŝƐ
^'͘
x ^LJƐƚĞŵWĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞ͗ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐLJƐƚĞŵƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞŝƐŶŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞĂƚĂ^ƚĂŐĞϮǀĂůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞǀĞů͘
9DOLGDWHG6DPSOH5HVXOW)RUPV/
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
6DPSOH1DPH 06
$QDO\WH &$61R 5HVXOW
9DOXH
5HVXOW
8QLWV
/DE
4XDOLILHU
5HSRUWLQJ
/LPLW
0DWUL[7\SH$
6DPSOH'DWH/DE6DPSOH1DPH/
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
&RPPHQWV
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURWULIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
'LEURPRHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURSURSDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURWHWUDIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
%XWDGLHQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LR[DQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OSHQWDQH XJP %
%XWDQRQH0(. XJP
&KORURWROXHQH XJP 8
3URSDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OWROXHQH XJP
0HWK\OSHQWDQRQH XJP
$FHWRQH XJP (
$OO\OFKORULGH XJP 8
%HQ]HQH XJP
%HQ]\O&KORULGH XJP 8
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
%URPRIRUP XJP 8
%URPRPHWKDQH XJP 8
&DUERQGLVXOILGH XJP
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH XJP 8
&KORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
&KORURHWKDQH XJP 8
&KORURIRUP XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
&KORURPHWKDQH XJP
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
&\FORKH[DQH XJP
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURGLIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
(WKDQRO XJP
(WK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
+HSWDQH XJP
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH XJP 8
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH XJP
P S;\OHQH XJP
0HWK\O%XW\O.HWRQH XJP
0HWK\OPHWKDFU\ODWH XJP 8
0HWK\OHQH&KORULGH XJP
07%( XJP 8
1DSKWKDOHQH XJP 8
Q+H[DQH XJP
R;\OHQH XJP
3URSHQH XJP
6W\UHQH XJP
7HWUDFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP
7HWUDK\GURIXUDQ XJP
7ROXHQH XJP
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP
7ULFKORURIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
9LQ\ODFHWDWH XJP 8
9LQ\O%URPLGH XJP 8
9LQ\OFKORULGH XJP 8
6DPSOH1DPH 06
$QDO\WH &$61R 5HVXOW
9DOXH
5HVXOW
8QLWV
/DE
4XDOLILHU
5HSRUWLQJ
/LPLW
0DWUL[7\SH$
6DPSOH'DWH/DE6DPSOH1DPH/
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
&RPPHQWV
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURWULIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
'LEURPRHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURSURSDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURWHWUDIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
%XWDGLHQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LR[DQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OSHQWDQH XJP %
%XWDQRQH0(. XJP
&KORURWROXHQH XJP 8
3URSDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OWROXHQH XJP
0HWK\OSHQWDQRQH XJP 8
$FHWRQH XJP
$OO\OFKORULGH XJP 8
%HQ]HQH XJP
%HQ]\O&KORULGH XJP 8
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
%URPRIRUP XJP 8
%URPRPHWKDQH XJP 8
&DUERQGLVXOILGH XJP 8
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH XJP 8
&KORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
&KORURHWKDQH XJP 8
&KORURIRUP XJP 8
&KORURPHWKDQH XJP
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
&\FORKH[DQH XJP
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURGLIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
(WKDQRO XJP
(WK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
+HSWDQH XJP
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH XJP 8
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH XJP
P S;\OHQH XJP
0HWK\O%XW\O.HWRQH XJP
0HWK\OPHWKDFU\ODWH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
0HWK\OHQH&KORULGH XJP
07%( XJP 8
1DSKWKDOHQH XJP 8
Q+H[DQH XJP %
R;\OHQH XJP
3URSHQH XJP
6W\UHQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP
7HWUDK\GURIXUDQ XJP
7ROXHQH XJP
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
9LQ\ODFHWDWH XJP 8
9LQ\O%URPLGH XJP 8
9LQ\OFKORULGH XJP 8
6DPSOH1DPH 06
$QDO\WH &$61R 5HVXOW
9DOXH
5HVXOW
8QLWV
/DE
4XDOLILHU
5HSRUWLQJ
/LPLW
0DWUL[7\SH$
6DPSOH'DWH/DE6DPSOH1DPH/
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
&RPPHQWV
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURWULIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
'LEURPRHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURSURSDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURWHWUDIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
%XWDGLHQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LR[DQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OSHQWDQH XJP %
%XWDQRQH0(. XJP
&KORURWROXHQH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
3URSDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OWROXHQH XJP
0HWK\OSHQWDQRQH XJP 8
$FHWRQH XJP (
$OO\OFKORULGH XJP 8
%HQ]HQH XJP
%HQ]\O&KORULGH XJP 8
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
%URPRIRUP XJP 8
%URPRPHWKDQH XJP 8
&DUERQGLVXOILGH XJP 8
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH XJP 8
&KORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
&KORURHWKDQH XJP 8
&KORURIRUP XJP 8
&KORURPHWKDQH XJP
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
&\FORKH[DQH XJP
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURGLIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
(WKDQRO XJP
(WK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
+HSWDQH XJP
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH XJP 8
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
P S;\OHQH XJP
0HWK\O%XW\O.HWRQH XJP
0HWK\OPHWKDFU\ODWH XJP 8
0HWK\OHQH&KORULGH XJP
07%( XJP 8
1DSKWKDOHQH XJP 8
Q+H[DQH XJP %
R;\OHQH XJP
3URSHQH XJP
6W\UHQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP
7HWUDK\GURIXUDQ XJP
7ROXHQH XJP
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
9LQ\ODFHWDWH XJP 8
9LQ\O%URPLGH XJP 8
9LQ\OFKORULGH XJP 8
6DPSOH1DPH 06
$QDO\WH &$61R 5HVXOW
9DOXH
5HVXOW
8QLWV
/DE
4XDOLILHU
5HSRUWLQJ
/LPLW
0DWUL[7\SH$
6DPSOH'DWH/DE6DPSOH1DPH/
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
&RPPHQWV
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURWULIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
'LEURPRHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURSURSDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURWHWUDIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
%XWDGLHQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LR[DQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OSHQWDQH XJP %
%XWDQRQH0(. XJP
&KORURWROXHQH XJP 8
3URSDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OWROXHQH XJP
0HWK\OSHQWDQRQH XJP 8
$FHWRQH XJP (
$OO\OFKORULGH XJP 8
%HQ]HQH XJP
%HQ]\O&KORULGH XJP 8
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
%URPRIRUP XJP 8
%URPRPHWKDQH XJP 8
&DUERQGLVXOILGH XJP
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH XJP 8
&KORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
&KORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
&KORURIRUP XJP 8
&KORURPHWKDQH XJP
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
&\FORKH[DQH XJP
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURGLIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
(WKDQRO XJP
(WK\OEHQ]HQH XJP
+HSWDQH XJP
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH XJP 8
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
P S;\OHQH XJP
0HWK\O%XW\O.HWRQH XJP
0HWK\OPHWKDFU\ODWH XJP 8
0HWK\OHQH&KORULGH XJP
07%( XJP 8
1DSKWKDOHQH XJP 8
Q+H[DQH XJP
R;\OHQH XJP
3URSHQH XJP
6W\UHQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP 8
7HWUDK\GURIXUDQ XJP
7ROXHQH XJP
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
9LQ\ODFHWDWH XJP 8
9LQ\O%URPLGH XJP 8
9LQ\OFKORULGH XJP 8
6DPSOH1DPH 06
$QDO\WH &$61R 5HVXOW
9DOXH
5HVXOW
8QLWV
/DE
4XDOLILHU
5HSRUWLQJ
/LPLW
0DWUL[7\SH$
6DPSOH'DWH/DE6DPSOH1DPH/
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
&RPPHQWV
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURWULIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LEURPRHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURSURSDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURWHWUDIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
%XWDGLHQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP %
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LR[DQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OSHQWDQH XJP %
%XWDQRQH0(. XJP
&KORURWROXHQH XJP 8
3URSDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OWROXHQH XJP 8
0HWK\OSHQWDQRQH XJP 8
$FHWRQH XJP (
$OO\OFKORULGH XJP 8
%HQ]HQH XJP
%HQ]\O&KORULGH XJP 8
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
%URPRIRUP XJP 8
%URPRPHWKDQH XJP 8
&DUERQGLVXOILGH XJP
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH XJP 8
&KORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
&KORURHWKDQH XJP 8
&KORURIRUP XJP 8
&KORURPHWKDQH XJP
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
&\FORKH[DQH XJP
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURGLIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
(WKDQRO XJP
(WK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
+HSWDQH XJP
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH XJP 8
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
P S;\OHQH XJP
0HWK\O%XW\O.HWRQH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
0HWK\OPHWKDFU\ODWH XJP 8
0HWK\OHQH&KORULGH XJP
07%( XJP 8
1DSKWKDOHQH XJP 8
Q+H[DQH XJP
R;\OHQH XJP
3URSHQH XJP
6W\UHQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP 8
7HWUDK\GURIXUDQ XJP
7ROXHQH XJP
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
9LQ\ODFHWDWH XJP 8
9LQ\O%URPLGH XJP 8
9LQ\OFKORULGH XJP 8
6DPSOH1DPH 06
$QDO\WH &$61R 5HVXOW
9DOXH
5HVXOW
8QLWV
/DE
4XDOLILHU
5HSRUWLQJ
/LPLW
0DWUL[7\SH$
6DPSOH'DWH/DE6DPSOH1DPH/
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
&RPPHQWV
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURWULIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LEURPRHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURSURSDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURWHWUDIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
%XWDGLHQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LR[DQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OSHQWDQH XJP %
%XWDQRQH0(. XJP
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
&KORURWROXHQH XJP 8
3URSDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OWROXHQH XJP 8
0HWK\OSHQWDQRQH XJP 8
$FHWRQH XJP (
$OO\OFKORULGH XJP 8
%HQ]HQH XJP
%HQ]\O&KORULGH XJP 8
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
%URPRIRUP XJP 8
%URPRPHWKDQH XJP 8
&DUERQGLVXOILGH XJP
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH XJP 8
&KORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
&KORURHWKDQH XJP 8
&KORURIRUP XJP 8
&KORURPHWKDQH XJP
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
&\FORKH[DQH XJP
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURGLIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
(WKDQRO XJP
(WK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
+HSWDQH XJP
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH XJP 8
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
P S;\OHQH XJP 8
0HWK\O%XW\O.HWRQH XJP 8
0HWK\OPHWKDFU\ODWH XJP 8
0HWK\OHQH&KORULGH XJP
07%( XJP 8
1DSKWKDOHQH XJP 8
Q+H[DQH XJP %
R;\OHQH XJP 8
3URSHQH XJP
6W\UHQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP
7HWUDK\GURIXUDQ XJP
7ROXHQH XJP
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
7ULFKORURIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP
9LQ\ODFHWDWH XJP 8
9LQ\O%URPLGH XJP 8
9LQ\OFKORULGH XJP 8
6DPSOH1DPH 75,3%/$1.
$QDO\WH &$61R 5HVXOW
9DOXH
5HVXOW
8QLWV
/DE
4XDOLILHU
5HSRUWLQJ
/LPLW
0DWUL[7\SH$
6DPSOH'DWH/DE6DPSOH1DPH/
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
9DOLGDWLRQ
4XDOLILHU
&RPPHQWV
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURWULIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LEURPRHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORURHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURSURSDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURWHWUDIOXRURHWKDQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
%XWDGLHQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LFKORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
'LR[DQH XJP 8
7ULPHWK\OSHQWDQH XJP 8
%XWDQRQH0(. XJP 8
&KORURWROXHQH XJP 8
3URSDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OWROXHQH XJP 8
0HWK\OSHQWDQRQH XJP 8
$FHWRQH XJP 8
$OO\OFKORULGH XJP 8
%HQ]HQH XJP 8
%HQ]\O&KORULGH XJP 8
%URPRGLFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
%URPRIRUP XJP 8
%URPRPHWKDQH XJP 8
&DUERQGLVXOILGH XJP 8
&DUERQWHWUDFKORULGH XJP 8
&KORUREHQ]HQH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI
$QDO\VLV0HWKRG 72
&KORURHWKDQH XJP 8
&KORURIRUP XJP 8
&KORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
FLV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
FLV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
&\FORKH[DQH XJP 8
'LEURPRFKORURPHWKDQH XJP 8
'LFKORURGLIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP 8
(WKDQRO XJP 8
(WK\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
+HSWDQH XJP 8
+H[DFKORUREXWDGLHQH XJP 8
,VRSURS\OEHQ]HQH XJP 8
P S;\OHQH XJP 8
0HWK\O%XW\O.HWRQH XJP 8
0HWK\OPHWKDFU\ODWH XJP 8
0HWK\OHQH&KORULGH XJP 8
07%( XJP 8
1DSKWKDOHQH XJP 8
Q+H[DQH XJP 8
R;\OHQH XJP 8
3URSHQH XJP 8
6W\UHQH XJP 8
7HWUDFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP
7HWUDK\GURIXUDQ XJP 8
7ROXHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURHWKHQH XJP 8
WUDQV'LFKORURSURSHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURHWK\OHQH XJP 8
7ULFKORURIOXRURPHWKDQH XJP 8
9LQ\ODFHWDWH XJP 8
9LQ\O%URPLGH XJP 8
9LQ\OFKORULGH XJP 8
7KXUVGD\'HFHPEHU3DJHRI