DAQ-2024-008172

1

DAQC-515-24
Site ID 10007 (B5)

MEMORANDUM

TO: CEM FILE – HOLCIM (US) INC.

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Rob Leishman, Environmental Scientist

DATE: May 24, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Portland Cement Rotary Kiln (K-1) and Clinker Cooler (CC-1)
Contact: Mark Miller – Director Land and Environment – 972-221-4646
Javier Ortiz – Plant Manager – 801-829-6821
Clinton Badger – 801-829-2122
Location: 6055 East Croydon Road, Morgan, Weber County, UT
Test Contractor: Mostardi Platt
FRS ID#: UT00000049002900001
Permit/AO#: Title V operating permit 2900001004 Dated November 18, 2021
Last Revised March 25, 2022
40 CFR 63 Subpart LLL
Subject: Review of RA/PST Protocol dated May 15, 2024

On May 15, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for a RA/PST (relative
accuracy/performance specification test) of the Holcim Devil’s Slide Cement Manufacturing Plant K-1
and CC-1 exhaust stacks in Morgan, Utah. Testing will be performed on July 16-18, 2024, to determine
the relative accuracy of the Hg, THC, O2, CO2, NOX, and SO2 monitoring systems. Testing will also
determine the filterable particulate emissions of the stacks.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK

2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK

3. RM 3A used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK

4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK

5. RM 5 used to determine particulate emissions: OK

6. RM 25A used to determine total gaseous organic concentration by flame ionization
detector: OK

7. RM 30B used to determine Hg emissions using APEX sorbent traps and Ohio Lumex
analyzers: OK

8 2 0
2

8. RM 320 used to determine CO2, H2O, SO2, NOX, and CO concentrations by Fourier
Transform Infrared (FTIR) detector: OK

9. RM 202 used to determine condensable particulate emissions: OK

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable. There will be particulate testing
done concurrently with this test.

RECOMMENDATION: Send attached protocol review and test date confirmation notice.

Holcim (US) Inc.
6055 E. Croydon Rd.
Morgan, Utah 84050

Phone [phone]
www.holcim.com/us

May 15, 2024

Harold Burge
Utah Division of Air Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Re: Performance and RATA Test Notification for Holcim (US), lnc.'s Devil's Slide Cement
Manufacturing Plant in Morgan, UT

Dear Mr. Burge,

Holcim (US) Inc. ("Holcim") owns and operates a Portland cement manufacturing plant located
in Morgan, UT. The Devil's Slide Plant operates under Utah Division of Air Quality issued Title V
Permit, No. 2900001004. The Plant is subject to the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement Industry ("Portland Cement NESHAP"), 40
C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart LLL and is a major source of HAPs.

Holcim is submitting this notification of performance and RATA testing for your review. The
purpose of this testing is to demonstrate compliance with the NESHAP emission standards for
existing sources for PM and CO, as well as to establish the site specific operating limits under
§63.1349(b)(1)(i). In addition, the RATA will test Hg, SO2, NOx, CO2, O2, THC, stack flow, and
emission rate. The test is currently scheduled to be conducted the week of July 15, 2024 by
Mostardi Platt.

If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 801-829-
6821.
Sincerely,
Javier Sosa Ortiz
Javier Sosa Ortiz
Plant Manager
Holcim US Cement

Relative Accuracy Test
Audit and Compliance (PM
and CO) Test Protocol
Holcim (US) Inc.
Devil’s Slide Cement Manufacturing Facility
Rotary Kiln Exhaust (K-1)
Clinker Cooler Stack (CC-1)
6055 Croydon Road
Morgan, UT 84050
Protocol No. P242910
Crown Point, IN I Mendota Heights, MN I Denver, CO | Henderson, NV
Corporate Headquarters
888 Industrial Drive
Elmhurst, Illinois 60126
630-993-2100

Relative Accuracy Test Audit and Compliance (PM and CO)
Test Protocol

Holcim (US) Inc.
Devil’s Slide Cement Manufacturing Facility
Rotary Kiln Exhaust (K-1)
Clinker Cooler Stack (CC-1)
6055 Croydon Road
Morgan, UT 84050

Protocol Submittal Date
May 14, 2024

Submitted By

Richard J. Sollars
[phone], Phone
[e-mail], Email

© Copyright 2024
All rights reserved in
Mostardi Platt

Protocol No. P242910

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SPECIFIC TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 TEST REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 RATA Test Requirements ................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 PM SSOL Test Requirements ............................................................................................................ 4
4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................................................. 4
5.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................................... 4
6.0 TEST METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................ 5
6.1 Method 1 Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination .................................................................... 5
6.2 Method 2 Volumetric Flow Rate Determination .................................................................................. 5
6.3 Method 3A Oxygen (O2) Determination .............................................................................................. 5
6.4 Method 5 Particulate Matter (PM) Determination ............................................................................... 5
6.5 Method 25A THC Determination ........................................................................................................ 6
6.6 Method 320 Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Detector for CO2, H2O, SO2, NOX, and CO
Determination ........................................................................................................................................... 6
6.7 Method 30B Mercury Determination (Sorbent Trap Method) ............................................................. 7
7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES..................................................................................................... 7
GENERAL INFORMATION APPENDED
Test Section Diagrams
Sample Train Diagrams
Calculation Nomenclature and Formula
Calibration Data
Field Data Sheets

Protocol No. P242910
Holcim (US) Inc. – Devil’s Slide Plant
K-1, CC-1 1 © Mostardi Platt
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) and compliance test will be performed by Mostardi Platt
on the Rotary Kiln Exhaust, designated as K-1, and Clinker Cooler Stack, designated as CC-1 for
Holcim (US) Inc. at the Devil’s Slide plant located in Morgan, Utah. This test program will be
completed in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Title 40,
Code of Federal Regulations and Part 63 (40CFR63) Subpart LLL “National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants”, 40CFR60 Subpart OOO “Standards of
Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants”, and Utah Department of Environmental
Quality (UDEQ) Title V Operating Permit #2900001004. Mostardi Platt is a self-certified air
emissions testing body (AETB).

The identification of individuals associated with the test program is summarized below:

Location Address Contact
Test Coordinator Holcim (US) Inc.
6055 East Croydon Road
Morgan, UT 84050
Clinton Badger
Area Manager, Environment and Public Affairs
801.829.2122
[e-mail]
Test Company
Representative
Mostardi Platt
7715 Commercial Way, Suite 155
Henderson, NV 89011
Richard J. Sollars II
Regional Manager
[phone]
[e-mail]

2.0 SPECIFIC TEST PROCEDURES
Detailed test procedures are appended. Test runs will be performed for each constituent in
accordance with the following USEPA reference methods:

1. The reference method traverse points will be selected in accordance with Method 1 to
ensure acquisition of representative samples of pollutant and diluent concentrations over
the flue gas cross section and to meet the requirements of Performance Specification (PS)
15 and Method 320 for CO2, NOX, and SO2; PS 3 and Method 3A for O2; PS 6 and Method
2 for volumetric flowrate; PS 8A and Method 25A for THC; and PS12A and Method 30B for
Hg. A three (3) point stratification test for oxygen (O2) will be performed during RATA run
1 per procedures in Section 8.1.2 of Method 7E in order to determine the number of sample
points required for testing.

2. Volumetric flow rate tests will be performed at the K-1 in accordance with USEPA Method
2. Nine to twelve (9-12) tests will be performed. Results will be expressed in units of
standard cubic feet per hour (scfh) and to convert constituents to pounds per hour (lb/hr).

3. Moisture test runs will be performed in conjunction with the above volumetric flow rate
testing in accordance with USEPA Method 320. Nine to twelve (9-12) tests will be
performed. Results will be expressed in units of percent by volume (%).

Protocol No. P242910
Holcim (US) Inc. – Devil’s Slide Plant
K-1, CC-1 2 © Mostardi Platt
4. A minimum of nine (9), thirty (30) minute CO2/O2 RATA runs will be performed at K-1 in
accordance with USEPA Method 3A and 320. Results will be expressed in units of % by
volume wet. CO2 will additionally be expressed in metric ton/hr.

5. A minimum of nine (9), thirty (30) minute NOX RATA runs will be performed at K-1 in
accordance with USEPA Method 320. Results will be expressed in units of parts per million
by volume wet (ppmvw) and lb/hr.

6. A minimum of nine (9), thirty (30) minute SO2 RATA runs will be performed at K-1 in
accordance with USEPA Method 320 and PS 15. Results will be expressed in units of
ppmvw and lb/hr.

7. A minimum of nine (9), thirty (30) minute THC RATA runs will be performed at K-1 in
accordance with USEPA Method 25A. Results will be expressed in units of parts per million
volume, dry (ppmvd).

8. A minimum of nine (9), thirty (30) minute Hg RATA test runs will be performed at the stack
location in accordance with USEPA Methods 30B, 320 (moisture) and PS 12A. Results will
be expressed in units of micrograms per wet standard cubic meter (µg/wscm).

9. The reference method tests will be conducted so that they will yield results representative
of the pollution concentration and emission rate from each unit and can be correlated with
the measurements from the continuous CO2/O2, NOX, SO2, volumetric flow rate, and THC
monitoring systems. To properly correlate individual CEM pollutant values with the
reference method data (e.g., NOX ppm, etc.) the beginning and end of each reference
method test run will be marked to include the exact time of day on the data acquisition
system. The expected analyzer range is 0-20% for CO2/O2, 0-500 ppm for NOX, 0-100 for
SO2, 0-1000 ppm for CO, and 0-50 ppm for THC.

10. Three (3), sixty (60) minute carbon monoxide (CO) test runs will be performed in
accordance with USEPA Method 320, 40CFR63, Appendix A in order to demonstrate
compliance with performance test requirements of the UDEQ Title V Operating Permit
#2900001003. Testing will be performed concurrent with the RATA.

11. Three (3), sixty (60) minute filterable particulate matter (PM) test runs will be performed in
accordance with USEPA Method 5, 40CFR60, Appendix A at each of K-1 and the CC-1.
Testing at K-1 will be performed during both “mill off” and “mill on” operating conditions. PM
testing at CC-1 will be performed during normal operating condition only. At CC-1 and per
section 8.6 of USEPA Method 2 – “for processes emitting essentially air, an analysis need
not be conducted; use a dry molecular weight of 29.0” – the CO2/O2 concentrations will be
assumed to be ambient. Results will be expressed in units of pounds per ton (lb/ton) and
used to determine the source specific operating limit (SSOL) for each test location.

Protocol No. P242910
Holcim (US) Inc. – Devil’s Slide Plant
K-1, CC-1 3 © Mostardi Platt
3.0 TEST REQUIREMENTS
3.1 RATA Test Requirements
The following tables present the parameters to be tested, test methodology, performance
requirements, number of test runs, and test duration:

Test
Location Parameter
Required Annual Performance
Criteria Units
Test
Method
No. of
Test
Runs
Test Run
Length
(min)
K-1
NOX
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or
≤ 10% RA of applicable standard
ppmvw
USEPA
Method
320
9-12 30
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or
≤ 10% RA of applicable standard
lb/hr
USEPA
Methods
1, 2, 3A,
and 320
9-12 30
SO2
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or
≤ 10% RA of applicable standard
ppmvw
USEPA
Method
320
9-12 30
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or
≤ 10% RA of applicable standard
lb/hr
USEPA
Methods
1, 2, 3A,
and 320
9-12 30
CO2
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or
≤ 10% RA of applicable standard
% (wet)
USEPA
Method
320
9-12 30
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or
≤ 10% RA of applicable standard
metric
ton/hr
USEPA
Methods
1, 2, 3A,
and 320
9-12 30
O2
≤ 20% RA, or CEMS average +/-
1.0% mean difference of RM
average
% (wet)
USEPA
Method
3A
9-12 30
Volumetric
Flow 1 ≤ 10% RA scfh USEPA
Method 2 9-12 ~5-10
THC
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or
≤ 10% RA of applicable standard
ppmvd
USEPA
Methods
25A and
320
9-12 30
Hg
≤ 20% RA of the mean reference
number, or CEMS average +/-
1.0 µg/scm mean difference of
RM average if RM average is < 5
µg/scm
µg/scm
USEPA
Method
30B
9-12 30

1 Per 40CFR63 Subpart LLL§ 63.1350(n)(8)(ii), “The relative accuracy of the flow rate monitoring
system shall be no greater than 10 percent of the mean value of the reference method data.

Protocol No. P242910
Holcim (US) Inc. – Devil’s Slide Plant
K-1, CC-1 4 © Mostardi Platt
3.2 PM SSOL Test Requirements
PM test results will be used to determine the SSOL. In addition to the test results, values recorded
by the plant Continuous Parametric Monitoring System (CPMS) will be utilized as well as a zero-
calibration value performed prior to testing. The SSOL will be calculated per the equations from
40CFR63 Subpart LLL, § 63.1349(b)(1)(iii)(B). Sample calculations are appended. PM test results
will also be used to demonstrate compliance with 40CFR63 Subpart LLL emissions standard as
detailed in the table below:

Test Location Parameter Test Method Emission Limit
K-1 PM USEPA Method 5 ≤0.07 lb/ton CC-1

4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Mostardi Platt will provide the scope of services described above according to the following
schedule:

Date Activity
Labor On-Site
Hours
7/15/24 Mobilize to site & set up test equipment on K-1 and CC-1. 5 4
7/16/24 Perform RATAs and CO compliance on K-1 (mill on). 5 10
7/17/24 Perform FPM testing on K-1 and CC-1 (mill on). 5 10
7/18/24 Perform FPM testing on K-1 (mill off). 5 10

5.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL
Mostardi Platt will provide the following personnel to conduct the scope of services described
above:

1 FTIR Analyst
1 Field Chemist
2 Test Engineers
1 Test Technician

Protocol No. P242910
Holcim (US) Inc. – Devil’s Slide Plant
K-1, CC-1 5 © Mostardi Platt
6.0 TEST METHODOLOGY
Emission testing will be conducted following the methods specified in 40CFR60, Appendix A.
Schematics of the sampling trains and data sheets to be used are appended.

The following methodologies will be performed during the test program:

6.1 Method 1 Sample and Velocity Traverse Determination
Test measurement points are selected in accordance with Method 1, 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix
A. The characteristic of the measurement location is summarized below.

Sample Point Selection
Test Location Duct Diameter Upstream Distance Downstream Distance
Test
Parameters
Number of
Sampling
Points
K-1 131.5 Inches 2.5 Diameters 10.9 Diameters
O2, CO2, SO2,
NOX, CO,
THC, Hg
3
Volumetric
flow rate 12
PM 12
CC-1 71 inches 2.1 Diameters 9.0 Diameters PM 12

6.2 Method 2 Volumetric Flow Rate Determination
Gas velocity is measured following Method 2, 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix A, for purposes of
calculating stack gas volumetric flow rate and emission rates on a lb/hr basis. An S-type pitot
tube, as a component of the isokinetic sampling trains, differential pressure gauge, thermocouple,
and temperature readout are used to determine gas velocity at each sample point. All of the
equipment used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the Method. Calibration data
is appended to the final report.

6.3 Method 3A Oxygen (O2) Determination
An oxygen (O2) analyzer will be used to determine O2 concentrations in the stack gas in
accordance with Method 3A, 40CFR60. This instrument has a paramagnetic detector and
operates in the nominal range of 0% to 25% O2. High-range calibrations will be performed using
Protocol One gas. Zero nitrogen (a low ppm pollutant in balance nitrogen calibration gases) will
be introduced during other instrument calibrations to check instrument zero. High- and a mid-
range % O2 levels in balance nitrogen will also be introduced. Zero and mid-range calibrations
will be performed using USEPA Protocol gas after each test run.

6.4 Method 5 Particulate Matter (PM) Determination
Stack gas filterable PM concentrations and emission rates are determined in accordance with
Method 5. The probe and filter housing will be maintained at a temperature of 248oF +/- 25oF. An
Environmental Supply Company, Inc. sampling train is used to sample stack gas at an isokinetic
rate. Four impingers will be utilized, the first two each containing 100ml of deionized water, the
third will remain empty, and the fourth will contain approximately 200 grams of silica gel. The
impingers will be weighed prior to and after each test run in order to determine moisture content

Protocol No. P242910
Holcim (US) Inc. – Devil’s Slide Plant
K-1, CC-1 6 © Mostardi Platt
of the stack gas. The total sample time will be 60 minutes – such that a minimum of 1 dscm of
sample will be collected for each run.

PM in the sample probe will be recovered utilizing acetone; a minimum of three passes of the
probe brush through the entire probe will be performed, followed by a visual inspection of the
acetone exiting the probe. If the acetone solution exiting the probe is clear, the wash will be
considered complete, if not, another pass of the brush through the probe will be made and
inspected until the solution is clear. The nozzle will then be removed from the probe and cleaned
in a similar manner, utilizing an appropriately sized nozzle brush. It is anticipated that the filter
and filter housing will be recovered in the Mostardi Platt mobile laboratory. The filter housing will
be washed a minimum of three times with acetone and inspected for cleanliness, and the filter
will be placed in its corresponding petri dish. The acetone wash and the filter will be labeled and
marked, then analyzed at Mostardi Platt’s laboratory in Henderson, Navada. All of the equipment
used is calibrated in accordance with the specifications of the Method. Calibration data will be
appended to the final report.

6.5 Method 25A THC Determination
The Method 25A sampling and measurement system meets the requirements for stack sampling
of THC set forth by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). In particular, it
meets the requirements of USEPA Reference Method 25A, “Determination of Total Gaseous
Organic Concentration Using a Flame Ionization Analyzer,” 40CFR60, Appendix A. This method
applies to the measurement of total gaseous organic concentration of hydrocarbons. With this
method, gas samples are extracted from the sample locations through heated Teflon sample lines
to the analyzers.

The flame ionization detectors (FIDs) to be used during this program are Thermo 51 Series Total
Hydrocarbon Analyzers. They are highly sensitive FIDs that provide a direct reading of total
organic vapor concentrations with linear ranges of 0-10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 ppm by volume.
The instruments are calibrated using ultra-zero air and propane in air EPA Protocol standards.
The calibrations are performed before and after sampling with calibration checks performed
between each test run. Final concentrations will be reported in ppm volume, dry as propane.

Calculations are performed by computer or by hand. An explanation of the nomenclature and
calculations along with the complete test results is included in the appendix. Also appended are
calibration data and copies of the raw field data sheets.

6.6 Method 320 Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Detector for CO2, H2O,
SO2, NOX, and CO Determination
Extractive Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry following USEPA Method 320 will be
performed for determination of CO2, H2O, SO2, NOX, and CO.

FTIR technology works on the principle that most gases absorb infrared light. This is true for all
compounds with the exception of homonuclear diatomic molecules and noble gases such as: N2,
O2, H2, He, Ne, and Ar. Vibrations, stretches, bends, and rotations within the bonds of a molecule
determine the infrared absorption distinctiveness. The absorption creates a “fingerprint" which is
unique to each given compound. The quantity of infrared light absorbed is proportional to the gas
concentration. Most compounds have absorbencies at different infrared frequencies, thus
allowing the simultaneous analysis of multiple compounds at one time. The FTIR software
compares each sample spectrum to a user-selected list of calibration references and
concentration data is generated.

Protocol No. P242910
Holcim (US) Inc. – Devil’s Slide Plant
K-1, CC-1 7 © Mostardi Platt

FTIR data will be collected using an MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer. Analyte spiking will
assure the ability of the FTIR to quantify analytes in the presence of effluent gas. All analyte
spikes will be introduced using an instrument grade stainless steel rotometer. All QA/QC
procedures will be within the acceptance criteria allowance of Method 320.

6.7 Method 30B Mercury Determination (Sorbent Trap Method)
Paired trains will be utilized using three test points at the test location. Per Method 30B sampling,
each sample will be collected on the paired in-situ sorbent traps. A tube of silica is used to capture
remaining moisture prior to the sample reaching the gas metering system.

The sample train used for this test program is designed by APEX, Inc. and meets all requirements
for Method 30B sampling. Samples will be analyzed utilizing an Ohio Lumex, Inc. analyzer for
mercury concentration.

7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
Mostardi Platt recognizes the previously described reference methods to be very technique
oriented and attempts to minimize all factors that can increase error by implementing its Quality
Assurance Program into every segment of its testing activities.

Copies of all pertinent calibration data (calibration gas certifications, Pitot tubes, dry gas meters,
nozzles, etc.) will be given to the on-site observer from the observing agency prior to testing and
included in the final test report.

Calculations are performed by computer. An explanation of the nomenclature and calculations
along with the complete test results will be appended in the final report. Calibration data and
copies of the raw field data sheets will also be appended. Analyzer interference data is kept on
file at Mostardi Platt.

All the data necessary for the agency to reproduce the reported results will be included in the final
test report. The data shall include, but not be limited to DAS printouts, unit operational data (e.g.,
steam flow, etc.) calibration data, uncorrected run averages, raw lab analysis (including
chromatograms, spectra or other instrument output, and calibration and QA/QC data) with
summary tables, and raw field data.

Dry gas meters are calibrated according to methods described in the Code of Federal
Regulations. The dry test meters measure the test sample volumes to within 2 percent at the
flowrate and conditions encountered during sampling.

APPENDIX

GASEOUS TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUCTS
(O2, CO2, NOX, SO2, CO, THC traverses)

1 2 3 1
Disturbance
Measurement
Site
Length
> 1/2 Dia.
Length
> 2 Dia.Disturbance

Job: Holcim (US) Inc.
Devil’s Slide Plant
Morgan, Utah

Test Location: K-1
Duct Diameter: 131.5 Inches
Duct Area: 94.27 Square Feet
No. Points Across Diameter: 3
No. of Ports: 1
Port Length: 12 Inches

EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUCTS
(Kiln PM)

3 2 1
3
2
1
2
3
1 2 3
3
2
1
4
Disturbance
Measurement
Site
Length
> 1/2 Dia.
Length
> 2 Dia.Disturbance1

Job: Holcim (US) Inc.
Devil’s Slide Plant
Morgan, Utah

Test Location: K-1
Duct Diameter: 131.5 Inches
Duct Area: 94.27 Square Feet
No. Points Across Diameter: 6
No. of Ports: 4
Port Length: 12 Inches

EQUAL AREA TRAVERSE FOR ROUND DUCTS
(Cooler PM)

1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
4 5 6 2
1
Disturbance
Measurement
Site
Length
> 1/2 Dia.
Length
> 2 Dia.Disturbance

Job: Holcim (US) Inc.
Devil’s Slide Plant
Morgan, Utah

Test Location: CC-1
Duct Diameter: 71.0 Inches
Duct Area: 27.494 Square Feet
No. Points Across Diameter: 6
No. of Ports: 2
Port Length: 12 Inches

USEPA Method 2- Type S Pitot Tube Manometer Assembly

1.90-2.54 cm
(0.75 -1.0 in.)*
7.62 cm (3 in.)*
Temperature
Sensor
Manometer
Leak-Free
Connections
*Suggested (Interference Free)
Pitot tube/ Thermocouple
Spacing
Ga
s

Fl
o
w

Flexible
Tubing
(0.25 in.)

USEPA Method 3A Extractive Gaseous Sampling Diagram

Heated Probe
3-Way
Calibration “T”
Heated Line
Sample Gas Line
Calibration Gas Line

Sample Gas Manifold
Calibration
Gases
Data Acquisition and
Report Generation
Gas Analyzer
Moisture
Removal
System
In-Line Filter

CO2
CO2
O2

Exhaust to Safe
Location

USEPA Method 320 – Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions by Extractive
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy Sample Train Diagram

Heated Wet
Sample Line
Heated Area
Extractive Probe
Initial Particulate
Filter
Calibration Gases
Data Acquisition System
FTIR Cell
FTIR Analyzer
Heated Pump
Secondary Filter
Heated Manifold
Orifice
Liquid
Nitrogen
Reservoir

MOISTURE CALCULATIONS

m(std)wsg(std)wc(std)
wsg(std)wc(std)
ws
m
bar
mm(std)
if
w std
stdif
wsg(std)
if
wstd
stdwif
wc(std)
VVV
VVB
T
13.6
HP
Y V 17.714V
)W(W 0.04715MP
T R )W(WV
)V0.04707(VMP
T R )V(VV
++
+=
∆+
=
−=−=
−=−=ρ

Where:
Bws = Water vapor in gas stream, proportion by volume
Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.015 lb/lb-mole
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the testing site, in. Hg
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg
R = Ideal gas constant, 0.048137 (in. Hg)(ft3)/(g-mole)(°R) =
[21.8348(in. Hg)(ft3)/(lb-mole)(°R)]/453.592 g-mole/lb-mole
Tm = Absolute average dry gas meter temperature, °R
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 530 °R
Vf = Final volume of condenser water, ml
Vi = Initial volume of condenser water, ml
Vm = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, dcf
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Vwc(std) = Volume of condensed water vapor, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Vwsg(std) = Volume of water vapor collected in silica gel, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Wf = Final weight of silica gel, g
Wi = Initial weight of silica gel, g
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor
∆H = Average pressure exerted on dry gas meter outlet by gas sample bag, in. H2O
ρw = Density of water, 0.9982 g/ml
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)
17.714 = Tstd/Pstd
0.04707 = ft3/ml 0.04715 = ft3/g

MOSTARDI PLATT
Volumetric Flow Nomenclature
A = Cross-sectional area of stack or duct, ft2

Bws =

Water vapor in gas stream, proportion by volume

Cp =

Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless

Md =

Dry molecular weight of gas, lb/lb-mole

Ms =

Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole

Mw =

Molecular weight of water, 18.0 lb/lb-mole

Pbar =

Barometric pressure at testing site, in. Hg

Pg =

Static pressure of gas, in. Hg (in. H2O/13.6)

Ps =

Absolute pressure of gas, in. Hg = Pbar + Pg

Pstd =

Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg

Qacfm =

Actual volumetric gas flow rate, acfm

Qsd =

Dry volumetric gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions, dscf/hr

R =

Ideal gas constant, 21.85 in. Hg-ft3/°R-lb-mole

Ts =

Absolute gas temperature, °R

Tstd =

Standard absolute temperature, 530°R

vs =

Gas velocity, ft/sec

Vw(std) =

Volume of water vapor in gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, scf

Y =

Dry gas meter calibration factor

∆p =

Velocity head of gas, in. H2O

K1 =

17.714 °R/in. Hg

%EA =

Percent excess air

%CO2 =

Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis

%O2 =

Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis

%N2 =

Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis

0.264 =

Ratio of O2 to N2 in air, v/v

0.28 =

Molecular weight of N2 or CO, divided by 100

0.32 =

Molecular weight of O2 divided by 100

0.44 =

Molecular weight of CO2 divided by 100

13.6 =

Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)

MOSTARDI PLATT

Volumetric Air Flow Calculations

𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)=17.647 × 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉× ��𝑃𝑃𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏+�𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷13.6��(460 +𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉)�× 𝑌𝑌

𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)=0.0471 × 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉

𝐵𝐵𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠=�𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)+𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)�

𝑀𝑀𝑠𝑠=(0.44 × %𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶2)+(0.32 × %𝐶𝐶2 )+[0.28 × (100 −%𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶2 −%𝐶𝐶2 )]

𝑀𝑀𝑠𝑠=𝑀𝑀𝑠𝑠× (1 −𝐵𝐵𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠)+(18 × 𝐵𝐵𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠)

𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠=�(𝑇𝑇𝑠𝑠+460)𝑀𝑀𝑠𝑠× 𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠× √𝐷𝐷𝑃𝑃× 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶× 85.49

𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉=𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠× 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 (𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝑠𝑠𝑑𝑑𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠)× 60

𝑆𝑆𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉=𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉× 17.647 × �𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠(460 +𝑇𝑇𝑠𝑠)�

𝑆𝑆𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴ℎ=𝑆𝑆𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉× 60 𝑉𝑉𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚ℎ𝐴𝐴

𝐷𝐷𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉=𝑆𝑆𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉× (1 −𝐵𝐵𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠)

MOSTARDI PLATT

Derivation of Factors Used in Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxides
Calculations

Factors for calculating from lb/dscf to parts per million:

Using 22.414 liters of gas per gram-mole at 0°C and 1 atmosphere pressure

One pound-mole of gas is contained in 359.04765 ft3 at 32°F and 29.92 in. Hg, or 385.31943 ft3
at 68°F and 29.92 in. Hg.
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑉𝑉=𝑀𝑀 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙-𝑉𝑉𝑜𝑜𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄385.31943 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙-𝑉𝑉𝑜𝑜𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄× 106 =2.5952494 × 10−9 𝑀𝑀 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄

Where M = pollutant molecular weight; SO2 = 64.0628 lb/lb-mole; and NO2 = 46.0055 lb/lb-mole

Factor for ppm SO2 =
9102.595264.06
1
−××
= 6.0151 × 106 dscf/lb

Use 6.0151 x 106

𝐹𝐹𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑉𝑉 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶𝑥𝑥=146.0055 × 2.5952494 × 10−9 =8.3755 × 106 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙⁄
Use 8.3755 x 106

Factors for calculating concentration as pounds per dry standard cubic feet:

5-5-
SO
107.0617 Use meq-glb107.061721
lb
grams453.592equivalent-gram
lentsmilliquiva-gram1000mole-gram
sequivalent-gram2
mole-grams/gram64.0628Cfor Factor 2
××=
××
=

𝐹𝐹𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁2 𝐴𝐴𝑠𝑠 𝑁𝑁𝐶𝐶2 =28316.846 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄4.53592 × 108 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙⁄=6.242801 × 10−5 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉⁄
Use 6.2428 x 10-5

MOSTARDI PLATT

Derivation of Factors Used in Carbon Monoxide Calculations

Factors for calculating from lb/dscf to parts per million:

Using 22.414 liters of gas per gram-mole at 0°C and 1 atmosphere pressure,

One pound-mole of gas is contained in 359.04765 ft3 at 32°F and 29.92 in. Hg, or 385.31943 ft3
at 68°F and 29.92 in. Hg.
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑉𝑉=𝑀𝑀 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙-𝑉𝑉𝑜𝑜𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄385.31943 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙-𝑉𝑉𝑜𝑜𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄× 106 =2.5952494 × 10−9 𝑀𝑀 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄

Where M = pollutant molecular weight; CO = 28.01 lb/lb-mole; and NO2 = 46.0055 lb/lb-mole

𝐹𝐹𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶=128.01 × 2.5952 × 10−9 =1.3762 × 107 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙⁄
Use 1.3762 x 107

Factors for calculating concentration as pounds per dry standard cubic feet:
𝐹𝐹𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑁𝑁=28.01 𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉-𝑉𝑉𝑜𝑜𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴⁄2 𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉-𝐴𝐴𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑑𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑒𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑚𝑚𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉-𝑉𝑉𝑜𝑜𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴× 1000 𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉-𝑉𝑉𝑚𝑚𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑑𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑒𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑚𝑚𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉-𝐴𝐴𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑑𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑒𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑚𝑚𝑠𝑠× 453.592 𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙
=3.087577 × 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝜇𝜇-𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑒𝑒⁄
Use 3.0876 x 10-5

MOSTARDI PLATT

ppm Conversion Calculations and Factors

ppm to lbs/scf

(ppm X) x (conversion factor X) = X lbs/scf

lbs/scf to lbs/hr

Dry ppm’s with dry flow, and wet ppm’s with wet flow.

(X lbs/scf) x (airflow scf/min) x (60 min/hr) = X lbs/hr

lbs/scf to lbs/mmBtu

Dry ppm’s with dry diluent, and wet ppm’s with wet diluent.

CO2 – (X lbs/scf) x (Fc) x (100/CO2) = X lbs/mmBtu

O2 – (X lbs/scf) x (Fd) x (20.9/(20.9-O2)) = X lbs/mmBtu

Conversion Factors

NOx – 1.19396 x 10-7

SO2 – 1.6625 x 10-7

CO – 7.2664 x 10-8

MOSTARDI PLATT

Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) Calculations

Mean Difference

Standard Deviation

Confidence Coefficient

Relative Accuracy

∑
=
=
n
1i
din
1d
212n
1i
in
1i
2
i
1n
n
d
d
Sd






−



−
=
∑∑=
=
n
SdtCC0.975=
100avg RM
CCdRA ×+=

MOSTARDI PLATT

Pollutant Concentration Correction 7% for Percent Oxygen

𝐶𝐶𝑏𝑏𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎=𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎20.9 −7%20.9 −%𝐶𝐶2

where:

Cadj = Pollutant concentration corrected to percent O2

20.9-7% = Percent O2, the defined O2 correction value, percent

20.9 = Percent O2 in air

%O2 = Measured O2 concentration dry basis, percent

Cd = Pollutant concentration measured, dry basis, ppm.

MOSTARDI PLATT
Isokinetic Nomenclature
A = Cross-sectional area of stack or duct, square feet
An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, square feet
Bws = Water vapor in gas stream, by volume
Ca = Acetone blank residue concentration, g/g
Cacf = Concentration of particulate matter in gas stream at actual conditions, gr/acf
Cp = Pitot tube coefficient
Cs = Concentration of particulate matter in gas stream, dry basis, corrected to standard conditions,
gr/dscf
IKV = Isokinetic sampling variance, must be 90.0 % ≤ IKV ≤ 110.0%
Md = Dry molecular weight of gas, lb/lb-mole
Ms = Molecular weight of gas, wet basis, lb/lb-mole
Mw = Molecular weight of water, 18.0 lb/lb-mole
ma = Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, grams
Pbar = Barometric pressure at testing site, inches mercury
Pg = Static pressure of gas, inches mercury (inches water/13.6)
Ps = Absolute pressure of gas, inches mercury = Pbar + Pg
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 inches mercury
Qacfm = Actual volumetric gas flow rate, acfm
Qsd = Dry volumetric gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions, dscfh
R = Ideal gas constant, 21.85 inches mercury cubic foot/°R-lb-mole
Tm = Dry gas meter temperature, °R
Ts = Gas temperature, °R
Tstd = Absolute temperature, 528°R
Va = Volume of acetone blank, ml
Vaw = Volume of acetone used in wash, ml
Wa = Weight of residue in acetone wash, grams
mn = Total amount of particulate matter collected, grams
V1c = Total volume of liquid collected in impingers and silica gel, ml
Vm = Volume of gas sample as measured by dry gas meter, dcf
Vm(std) = Volume of gas sample measured by dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, dscf
vs = Gas velocity, ft/sec
Vw(std) = Volume of water vapor in gas sample, corrected to standard conditions, scf
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor
∆H = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter, inches water
∆p = Velocity head of gas, inches water
ρa = Density of acetone, 0.7855 g/ml (average)
ρw = Density of water, 0.002201 lb/ml
θ = Total sampling time, minutes
K1 = 17.647 °R/in. Hg
K2 = 0.04707 ft3/ml
K4 = 0.09450/100 = 0.000945
Kp = Pitot tube constant, 85.49 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠�(𝑙𝑙𝑏𝑏𝑙𝑙𝑏𝑏⁄−𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑠)(𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖. 𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻)(°𝑅𝑅)(𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖. 𝐻𝐻2𝑁𝑁)�1 2�
%EA = Percent excess air
%CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis
%O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis
%CO = Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis
%N2 = Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis
0.264 = Ratio of O2 to N2 in air, v/v
28 = Molecular weight of N2 or CO
32 = Molecular weight of O2
44 = Molecular weight of CO2
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury (Hg)

MOSTARDI PLATT

Isokinetic Calculation Formulas

1. lc2std
std
w
wlcw(std)VKP
RT
MVV =










=ρ
2.
m
bar
m1std
bar
m
stdmm(std)T
))13.6
H((P
Y VK P
))13.6
H((P
T
TY VV
∆+
=





∆+





=
3. )V(V
VB
w(std)m(std)
w(std)
ws +=
4. )0.28(%N)0.32(%O)0.44(%COM 222d++=

5. )18.0(B)B(1MM wswsds+−=
6.
aa
aaV
mCρ=
7. aawaaVCWρ=
8. 





+=
sm(std)w(std)
sniacf T VV
Pm15.43KC
9. )Vm( )gramgrains 15.43(C m(std)nS=
10.
ss
sppsMP
T PCKv∆=
11. )A(60vQ sec/minsacfm=
12. A PT
PT v )B)(1(3600Q
stds
sstdswssec/hrsd 




−=
13. ()lbgrains 7000CQ )hrlbs rate, (emission E sstd=
14. ()()wsnss
m(std)s
4wssnsstd
stdm(std)s
B1AvP
VTKB160PAvT
PVTIKV −=−=θθ
15. 100%CO) 0.5(%O%N 0.264
%CO) (0.5%O%EA
22
2 ×





−−
−=

MOSTARDI PLATT

Site Specific Operating Limit (SSOL) Nomenclature

ECm = Combined hourly emission rate of PM from the kiln and bypass stack and/or inline coal mill,
lb/ton of kiln clinker production

EK = Hourly emissions of PM emissions from the kiln, lb

EB = Hourly PM emissions from the alkali bypass stack, lb

EC = Hourly PM emissions from the inline coal mill stack, lb

Ol = The operating limit for your PM CPMS on a 30-day rolling average, in milliamps or the digital
equivalent.

L = Your source emission limit expressed in lb/ton clinker

P = Hourly clinker production, tons

R = The relative lb/ton-clinker per milliamp or digital equivalent for your PM CPMS

Y1 = The three run average lb/ton-clinker PM concentration

X1 = The three run average milliamp or digital equivalent output from the PM CPMS

z = The milliamp or digital equivalent of instrument zero determined

MOSTARDI PLATT
Mercury Emission Calculations

Concentration
𝑚𝑚𝜇𝜇 𝑉𝑉3 = 𝑚𝑚𝜇𝜇 𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴𝑚𝑚 𝑉𝑉3 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴 𝑒𝑒𝑜𝑜𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴 𝑠𝑠𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐶𝐶𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑠𝑠 × 0.02832 𝐴𝐴𝑠𝑠3
Emission Rate

𝑚𝑚𝜇𝜇 𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝑠𝑠𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐶𝐶𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴 × 1 × 10−9𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑠𝑠 𝑚𝑚𝜇𝜇 = 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴𝑚𝑚 453.6 𝜇𝜇𝐴𝐴/𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴𝑚𝑚 𝑉𝑉𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)𝑠𝑠𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝐶𝐶𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴 × 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉 × 60 = 𝑉𝑉𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑜𝐴𝐴 𝑉𝑉𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴𝑚𝑚/ℎ𝐴𝐴 ℎ𝐴𝐴

MOSTARDI PLATT

Procedures for Method 5 and Flow Calibration

Nozzles

The nozzles are measured according to Method 5, Section 10.1

Dry Gas Meters

The test meters are calibrated according to Method 5, Section 10.3 and “Procedures for Calibrating and Using Dry
Gas Volume Meters as Calibration Standards” by P.R. Westlin and R.T. Shigehara, March 10, 1978.

Analytical Balance

The accuracy of the analytical balance is checked with Class S, Stainless Steel Type 303 weights manufactured by
F. Hopken and Son, Jersey City, New Jersey.

Temperature Sensing Devices

The potentiometer and thermocouples are calibrated utilizing a NBS traceable millivolt source.

Pitot Tubes

The pitot tubes utilized during this test program are manufactured according to the specification described and
illustrated in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1 and 2. The pitot tubes
comply with the alignment specifications in Method 2, Section 10.1; and the pitot tube assemblies are in
compliance with specifications in the same section.

Dry Gas Meter/Control Module Calibration Diagram

Standard
Dry Gas Meter
Dry Gas Meter
Stack
Temperature
Calibrator
Air-Tight
Pump
Orifice Incline
Gauge
Temperature Sensor
Temperature Sensors
Air Inlet
Temperature Display

Dry Gas Meter No.CM-1 Date:
Standard Meter No.Calibrated By:
Standard Meter (Y)Barometric Pressure:
Orifice Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Standard Meter Dry Gas Meter Dry Gas Meter Dry Gas Meter
Setting in H 2 O Gas Volume Gas Volume Temp. F o Inlet Temp. F o Outlet Temp. F o Avg. Temp. F o Time Time
Chg (H)vr vd tr tdi tdo td Min Sec Y Chg (H)
Final
Initial
Difference 1 0.20
Final
Initial
Difference 2 0.50
Final
Initial
Difference 3 0.70
Final
Initial
Difference 4 0.90
Final
Initial
Difference 5 1.20
Final
Initial
Difference 6 2.00
Average
Run Number

Stack Temperature Sensor Calibration
Meter Box # :CM-1 Name :
Ambient Temperature :o F Date :
Calibrator Model # :
Serial # :
Date Of Certification :
Primary Standards Directly Traceable National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
0
250
600
1200
(Ref. Temp., oF + 460) - (Test Therm. Temp., oF + 460)* 100 <= 1.5 %
Ref. Temp., oF + 460
Thermometer
Temperature (o F)
0.0
0.0
0.0
Temperature
Difference %
0.0
Reference
Source
Temperature (o F)
Test

S TYPE PITOT TUBE INSPECTION FORM
Pitot Tube No:1 Date:Inspectors Name:
Pitot tube assembly level?x yes no
Pitot tube openings damaged? yes (explain below)x no
a1 =1 o (<10o),a2 =1 o (<10o)z = A sin g =0.008 (in.); (<0.125 in.)
b1 =0 o (<5o),b2 =2 o (<5o)w = A sin q =0.025 (in.); (<0.03125 in.)
γ =0.5 ο , θ =1.5 o ,A =0.938 (in.)PA =0.477 (in.), P B =0.477 (in.), Dt =0.375 (in.)
Calibration required?yes x no

CALIBRATION SUMMARY

Project Number: Date:
Client: Operator:
Test Location: Box Truck:

Analyzer
Type, S/N,
and Span
Cal
Level
Cylinder ID
Serial
Number
Expected
Cal Value
Actual
Response
Difference
As % of
Span
Cylinder
Pressure
(psi)
Cylinder
Expiration
Date
CO2 Zero
Mid
High
SO2 Zero
Mid
High
NOx Zero
Mid
High
CO Zero
Mid
High

PART 75 AND 60 GASEOUS FIELD DATA SHEET

Project Number: Date:
Client: Operator:
Test Location: Fuel Factor:

Time Reference Method Data Volumetric Flow Data
Test Start End NOX ppm SO2 ppm CO2 % Time scfh, RM Data scfh, CEM Data

Calibration Corrected RM Data CEM Data
Test NOX ppm SO2 ppm CO2 % NOX lb/MMBtu NOX ppm SO2 ppm CO2 % NOX lb/MMBtu

Method 25A Calibration Summary

Project: Date:
Client: Operator:
Location: Analyzer ID:
Analyzer Range:

Cal
Run
Cal
Level Test
Location
Cylinder
ID Serial
Number
Cal Gas
Type
Cal
Time Expected
Cal Value
Actual
Response
Difference
(% of cal
value)
Drift
(% of
span) Cylinder
Pressure

Pre 1
Zero N/A
Low N/A
Mid N/A
High N/A

Post 1/
Pre 2
Zero
Low
Mid
High

Post 2/
Pre 3
Zero
Low
Mid
High

Post 3
Zero
Low
Mid
High

Zero
Low
Mid
High

Zero
Low
Mid
High

Volumetric Flow Rate Determination Field Data Sheet

Project Number: Date:
Client: Test Number:
Test Location: Start Time:
Source Condition: End Time:
Test Engineer: Test Tech:

Duct Diameter ______ ft Upstream Disturbance, Diameters ______
Flue Area _________ ft2 Downstream Disturbance, Diameters ______
Port Length ______″ Pitot ID______ Pitot Coefficient (Cp) ______
Pbar ______ ″Hg CO2 % ______ Wet Bulb Temp _____ Leak Checks Passed@
Static_____ ″H2O O2 % ______ Dry Bulb Temp _____ Pre _____Inches H2O
Static______ ″Hg N2 % _____ Bws _____ Post _____Inches H2O
Ps_______ ″Hg Meter No._____ Fluke # _______ Umbilical ID ___

44 x CO2% + .32 x O2% + .28 x N2% = _______ (Md)

(_________ Md × ________1-Bws) + (18 ×_______Bws) = ______ (Ms)

()()Vssecft____P____ ____Ps ____Ms
R Ts___________Cp 85.49 =∆××
°××
______ Vs × ______ Flue Area × 60 = ________________acfm

17.647 × ______acfm ×
R Ts
Ps
°
= ___________ scfm x 60 = ___________ scfh

Port-
Point # ∆Ρ
Temp.
°F ∆Ρ
Null
Point
Angle,
Degrees
Port-
Point # ∆Ρ
Temp.
°F ∆Ρ
Null
Point
Angle,
Degrees

Average

MOISTURE FIELD DATA SHEET

Project:_______________________________________________________Date: _________________________________
Sampling Location: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Source Condition: _______________________________________________ Monitor: Model _______________________
Dry Gas Meter No. _______________________ Y=__________________Serial No._______________________
Orsat Analysis
___________%CO2 __________%O2

Clock Time

24 hour
Meter
Volume
(Vm)
ft3
Meter
Gage
Pressure
(∆H)
in. H2O
Meter
Temp.
(tm)
°F
Impgr.
Outlet
Temp
°F

Condensate Silica Gel or Train

_________________mls (Vf) _________grams (Wf)
-_________________mls (Vi) -_________grams (Wi)
_________________mls _________grams
× 0.04707 = _________ × 0.04715 = _________
________ft3 [Vwc(std)] + _______ ft3 [Vwsg(std)]
= __________ ft3 [Vw(std)]
Vm(std) = ___________ ft3
Water Vapor, proportion by volume
Leak Check: Bws = ______________

Moisture correction factor:
1 - Bws = ___________
Comments:
Avg. (Tm) °R
Test (Run) No. _______________ Barometric Pressure (Pbar)___________________in.
Hg
Gas Temperature ______________ °F Static Pressure _________________________in.
Hg
Orsat Analysis
___________%CO2 __________%O2
Clock Time

24 hour
Meter
Volume
(Vm)
ft3
Meter
Gage
Pressure
(∆H) in.
H2O
Meter
Temp.
(tm)
°F
Impgr.
Outlet
Temp
°F

Condensate Silica Gel or Train

_________________mls (Vf) _________grams (Wf)
-_________________mls (Vi) -_________grams (Wi)
_________________mls _________grams
× 0.04707 = _________ × 0.04715 = _________
________ft3 [Vwc(std)] + _______ ft3 [Vwsg(std)]
= __________ ft3 [Vw(std)]
Vm(std) = ___________ ft3
Water Vapor, proportion by volume
Leak Check: Bws = ______________

Moisture correction factor:
1 - Bws = ___________
Comments:
Avg. (Tm) °R

Vm(std) = 17.64 VmY Bws = Operator ______________

P DH
13.6
T
bar
m
+V
V V
w(std)
w(std)m(std)+

IMPINGER WEIGHT SHEET
PLANT:________________________________________
UNIT NO:______________________________________
LOCATION:____________________________________
DATE:_________________________________________
TEST NO:______________________________________
METHOD:______________________________________
WEIGHED/MEASURED BY:________________________
BALANCE ID:____________________________________
FINAL WEIGHT INITIAL WEIGHT IMPINGER IMPINGER
Circle One:MLS / GRAMS MLS / GRAMS GAIN CONTENTS
IMPINGER 1
IMPINGER 2
IMPINGER 3
IMPINGER 4
IMPINGERS
FINAL TOTAL INITIAL TOTAL TOTAL IMPINGER GAIN
SILICA
FINAL TOTAL INITIAL TOTAL TOTAL SILICA GAIN

METHOD 18 ADSORPTION TUBE PROCEDURE FIELD DATA SHEET
Project Number: Date:
Client Name: Source Condition:
Test Location: Barometric Pressure:
Test Engineer: Run Number:

SAMPLE TRAIN A - UNSPIKED SAMPLE TRAIN B - SPIKED
Time Volume, L Meter
Temp, oF
Vacuum,
“Hg
Time Volume Meter
Temp, oF
Vacuum,
“Hg

SAMPLE TRAIN A - UNSPIKED SAMPLE TRAIN B - SPIKED
Dry Gas Meter No.: Dry Gas Meter No.:
Y: Y:
XAD Trap ID: XAD Trap ID:
Charcoal Trap ID: Charcoal Trap ID:

Pre-Test Leak Check – Pass @ ʺHg
(Must be ≥ 15”Hg)

Pre-Test Leak Check – Pass @ ʺHg
(Must be ≥ 15”Hg)

Post-Test Leak Check – Pass @ ʺHg

Post-Test Leak Check – Pass @ ʺHg