HomeMy WebLinkAboutDAQ-2024-0074481
DAQC-337-24
Site ID 11979 (B2)
MEMORANDUM
TO: FILE – WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL
THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager
FROM: Joseph Randolph, Environmental Scientist
DATE: April 15, 2024
SUBJECT: Title V Annual Compliance Certification Receipt/Review,
FRS ID # UT0000004905300053
REPORT RECEIVED/DUE DATE: April 5, 2024 (email)/ April 15, 2024
TITLE V PERMIT #: 5300053004
DATE OF LAST
PERMIT REVISION: August 10, 2022
CERTIFICATION PERIOD: March 1, 2023 to February 29, 2024
FACILITY REPORTED
COMPLIANCE STATUS: Continuous
REPORT EVALUATION:
• Was report submitted on time? Yes
• Did report identify status of compliance for each condition? Yes
• Was compliance status marked as continuous/intermittent for each condition? Yes
• Did report identify method used to determine compliance with each condition? Yes
• Was report signed and properly certified by responsible official? Yes
• Were exceedances/excursions reported? No
• Were deviations reported? No
COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION:
The report appears to meet the requirements of Title V operating permit condition I.L.
ATTACHMENT:
Annual Compliance Certification Report
0 ( 8
April 5, 2024
rvcd email
04/05/2024
Page 1 of 9
TO: Director, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ)
FROM: Washington County Landfill
RE: Annual Compliance Certification for Permit # 5300053004
DATE: April 15, 2024
In accordance with Operating Permit provision I.L and Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R307-415-6c(5), the following compliance certification is
submitted.
This certification covers operations from 3/01/2023 to 2/29/2024.
(Note: The certification period must be consecutive to the last certification, and cannot cover more than one year.
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
I.B Was the source operated in
compliance with the operating
permit?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
Page 2 of 9
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
I.C.1 Did the permittee comply with all
the conditions of the operating
permit?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.C.3 Did the permittee furnish
information requested by the
Director within reasonable time?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.E Did permittee submit a timely and
complete application for renewal?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.G.1 Did the permittee pay the annual
emission fee?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.G.2 Was the fee paid on time? Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.J Permittee allowed Director or
authorized representative to
perform items in I.J.1. a through
I.J.1.d
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.K Were all application forms, reports
and certifications submitted
pursuant to the permit certified by
a responsible official?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.L.1 Did the permittee submit a
complete compliance certification
on time?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.L.2 Did the permittee also send all
compliance certifications to EPA?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
Page 3 of 9
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
I.N If an emergency occurred,
permittee complied with provisions
I.N.2.a. through I.N.2.d
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.S.1.a Did the permittee properly retain
all records required by the permit
for at least 5 years?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.S.1.b Did the permittee include all
applicable information in records of
monitoring required by the permit?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
I.S.2.a Did the permittee submit
monitoring reports every six
months, or more frequently if
specified in Section II, and were all
instances of deviation from permit
requirements clearly identified in
the monitoring reports?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.S.2.b All reports submitted were certified
by a Responsible Official?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
Page 4 of 9
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
I.S.2.c Did the permittee promptly notify
the Director of all deviations from
permit requirements?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
I.U Did the permittee submit the
inventory required by R307-150 in
accordance with the requirements
of that rule?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
II.B.1.a.2 Did the permittee maintain records
of measures taken to minimize
fugitive dust?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
II.B.1.b Visible emissions were no greater
than 20% opacity.
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
II.B.1.b.1 Did the permittee perform a visual
opacity survey of each affected
emission unit quarterly as required
under the condition?
Quarterly Visual
Opacity Survey.
Record Keeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
II.B.1.b.2 Did the permittee maintain a log of
visual opacity surveys on the
affected emission unit?
Quarterly Visual
Opacity Survey.
Record Keeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
II.B.1.c Did the permittee operate and
monitor sources in a manner
consistent with safety and good air
pollution control practices to
minimize emissions during periods
of operation and startup, shutdown
and malfunction? II.B.1.c.1 through
II.B.1.c.3
Monitoring,
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
Continuous None
Page 5 of 9
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
II.B.1.d Did the permittee maintain up-to-
date, readily assessable records of
the design capacity report, current
amount of solid waste in-place,
and year-by-year waste
acceptance rate, performance
testing, collection system
downtime, GCCS operational
exceedances, for at last 5 years?
II.B.1.d.1 through II.B.1.d.3
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
II.B.1.e Did the permittee maintain up-to-
date, readily accessible records of
collection system exceedances of
the operational negative pressure
standards in this condition?
II.B.1.e.1 through II.B.1.e.3
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
Continuous None
II.B.1.f Did the permittee maintain up-to-
date, readily accessible records of
collection system exceedances of
the operational temperature
standards in this condition?
II.B.1.f.1 through II.B.1.f.3
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
Continuous None
II.B.1.g Did the permittee maintain up-to-
date, readily accessible records of
surface emissions exceedances of
the operational standards in this
condition? II.B.1.g.1 through
II.B.1.g.3
Surface
Emissions
Monitoring,
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
Continuous None
II.B.1.h Did the permittee calculate NMOC
emission rate in accordance with
permit requirement II.B.1.h.1?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous None
II.B.1.i Did the permittee develop and
maintain a startup, shutdown, and
malfunction (SSM) plan and keep
up-to-date, readily accessible SSM
records in accordance with this
condition? II.B.1.i.1 through
II.B.1.i.3?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
Continuous None
Page 6 of 9
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
II.B.1.j Unless a natural barrier deters
public access, did permittee
comply with either the fencing and
warning sign requirements (40
CFR 61.154) or cover material with
6 inches of non-asbestos
containing material daily.
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.j.1 Did permittee perform a visual
inspection of the property quarterly
(warning signs) or daily visual
inspections (6 inches of cover
material)
Quarterly Visual
Opacity Survey.
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.j.2 Did the permittee maintain a log of
visual opacity observations or
visual inspections of asbestos
disposal operation?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.k Did permittee either discharge no
visible emissions to the outside air
or cover asbestos-containing
material for all asbestos
operations.
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.k.1 Did the permittee perform daily
visual opacity observation or visual
inspection of sites where asbestos
containing waste is deposited?
Daily
Observations/
Inspections,
Record Keeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.k.2 Did the permittee maintain a log of
inspections of monitoring
activities?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.l.2 Did the permittee maintain waste
shipment records of all asbestos-
containing waste material
received?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.l.3 Did the permittee perform
shipment tracking and document
instances of improperly enclosed
or uncovered asbestos-containing
wastes?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
Page 7 of 9
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
II.B.1.m.2 Did the permittee maintain a map
of records of the location, depth,
and quantity of asbestos-
containing waste on site until
closure?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.m.3
Did the permittee report any
excavations of asbestos-
containing waste material that has
been deposited on site to the
Director in writing at least 45 days
prior to excavation activities?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.n Upon closure of an asbestos-
containing waste disposal site,
permittee shall submit a copy of
waste disposal locations and
quantities and comply with either
discharging no visible emissions to
the outside air or covering
asbestos-containing material.
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.n.1 Did the permittee perform quarterly
visual inspections of each closed
site where asbestos-containing
waste material is deposited?
Quarterly Visual
Opacity Survey.
Record Keeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.n.2 Did the permittee maintain a log of
quarterly inspections on above
monitoring activities?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
Page 8 of 9
Term
Description of permit provision
Method used to
determine
compliance
status
Was compliance
during report period
continuous,
intermittent or
undetermined?
Other info relevant to compliance status, including
references to any and all deviations; reason for
“undetermined” status; any excursions or exceedances
(for CAM provisions only); etc.
II.B.1.n.3 Did the permittee report any
excavations to the Director at least
45 days prior to excavating and
record a notation on the deed to
the facility property that the site
has been used for asbestos-
containing waste material?
Recordkeeping
and Reporting.
Continuous Site does not accept asbestos.
II.B.1.o Was the H2S content of the LFG
monitored at least once per
calendar year? II.B1.o.1 through
II.B.1.o.3
Annual
Monitoring;
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
Continuous The H2S content of the LFG was sampled on February 3,
2022 and results were 1,200 parts per million (ppm) for both
readings. The next annual sampling event will be completed
prior to the end of March 2023.
II.B.1.p Was the flare operated with no
visible emissions (except for
periods not to exceed a total of 5
minutes during any 2 consecutive
hours), and continuously operated
with a flame present except for
periods of startup, shutdown, or
malfunction? II.B.1.p.1 through
II.B.1.p.3.
Recordkeeping
and Recording
Continuous None