DAQ-2024-008055

1

DAQC-463-24
Site ID 10569 (B4)
MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – KILGORE COMPANIES, LLC – West Valley Pit #10 –
Salt Lake County

THROUGH: Rik Ombach, Minor Source Oil and Gas Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Kyle Greenberg, Environmental Scientist

DATE: May 14, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-flow Hot Mix
Asphalt Plant
Location: 6200 West 5400 South, Kearns, UT 84118
Contact: Lee Ware: 801-831-7402
Tester: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC
Site ID #: 10569
Permit/AO #: DAQE-AN105690012-19 dated April 30, 2019
Subject: Review of Pretest Protocol dated May 13, 2024

On May 13, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a protocol for testing of Dillman 500
TPH Portable Counter-flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant at West Valley Pit #10 in Salt Lake County. Testing
will be performed on June 19, 2024, to determine compliance with the emission limits found in conditions
II.B.1.b and II.B.2.c of Approval Order DAQE-AN105690012-19.

PROTOCOL CONDITIONS:

1. RM 1 used to determine sample velocity traverses: OK
2. RM 2 used to determine stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate: OK
3. RM 3 used to determine dry molecular weight of the gas stream: OK
4. RM 4 used to determine moisture content: OK
5. RM 5 used to determine particulate matter emissions: OK
6. RM 9 used to determine visible emissions opacity: OK
7. RM 202 used to determine condensable particulate matter: OK

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The protocol appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: The methods proposed in the pretest protocol are sufficient to determine
particulate matter emissions and visible emissions from the Dillman 500
TPH Portable Counter-flow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant. It is recommended
that the pretest protocol be determined as acceptable.

ATTACHMENTS: Kilgore Company’s Test Notification Letter and Pretest Protocol

Source Test Plan for 2024 PM, PM10, PM2.s, and
VEOs Compliance Testing
Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-flow Hot Mix
Asphalt (HMA) Plant
Kilgore Companies LLC
West Valley Pit #10 HMA Plant
Kearns, Utah 84118
Prepared For:
Kilgore Companies LLC
West Valley Pit #10 HMA Plant
6200 West 5400 South
Kearns, Utah 84118
Prepared By:
Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC
6823 South 3600 West
Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
For Submission To:
State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820
Document Number: GP081AS-041316-PP-848
Proposed Test Date: June 19, 2024
Submittal Date: May 13, 2024
MO
A I R QUA l IT Y SE RV ICES
STAe .r..
l!#IO(Nlnl.rt~COIA!Q ~
TOASTH O..U ONL-Y
Ctt1't1J;aHI
Revi ew and Certification
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information contained i n this document is
complete and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality
Management System and ASTM D7036-04.
Signature: Date: May 13, 2024
N ame: Cheyney Guymon Title: Field Project Manager
I have reviewed, technically and editorially, details and other appropriate written materials
contained herein. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the presented material
is authentic and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the Montrose Quality
Management System and ASTM D7036-04.
Signature: Date: May 13, 2024
Name: Joby bunmire Title: QA/QC Specialist
Facility Certification
I have reviewed this document and agree that the information contained herein is true,
accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge.
Signature: Date: May 09, 2024
Name: Bryan Jorgensen Title: Environmental Manager
~ilgo-;'co,;pa ~;;s -~-
,bo24 PM , PM,o , PM 2s , and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , Wes t Valley Pit #10 , Di ll man 500 T PH HMA
~.1~ear'!s, ~a~ _ ~
2 of 62 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5
1.1 Summary of Test Program ............................................................................. 5
1.2 Applicable Regulations and Emission Limits ...................................................... 6
1.3 Key Personnel .............................................................................................. 7
2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions ................................................................ 8
2.1 Process Description, Operation, and Control Equipment ..................................... 8
2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Location ........................................................................... 8
2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data ........................................................... 9
2.4 Plant Safety ................................................................................................. 9
2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities .......................................................................... 9
2.4.2 Safety Program and Requirements ....................................................... 11
3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures ..................................................................... 11
3.1 Test Methods ............................................................................................. 11
3.1.1 EPA Method 1, Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources ...... 12
3.1.2 EPA Method 2, Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow
Rate (Type S Pitot Tube) ................................................. : .................. 12
3.1.3 EPA Method 3, Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight
12
3.1.4 EPA Method 4, Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas ............... 13
3.1.5 EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter from
Stationary Sources and Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable
Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources ...................................... 14
3.1.6 EPA Method 9, Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions ............. 15
4.0 Quality Assurance and Reporting .......................................................................... 16
4.1 QA Audits .................................................................................................. 16
4.2 Quality Control Procedures .......................................................................... 16
4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance ................................................ 16
4.2.2 Audit Samples ................................................................................... 16
4.3 Data Analysis and Validation ........................................................................ 16
4.4 Sample Identification and Custody ................................................................ 17
4.5 Quality Statement ...................................................................................... 17
4.6 Reporting .................................................................................................. 17
4.6.1 Example Report Format ...................................................................... 18
4.6.2 Example Presentation of Test Results ................................................... 18
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM , PM ,o, PM 2 ,, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 3 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
List of Appendices
A Supporting Information ...................................................................................... 20
A.1 Units and Abbreviations .............................................................................. 21
A.2 Accreditation Information/Certifications ........................................................ 22
A.3 AO DAQE-AN0105690012-19 ...................................................................... 31
"S" Field Work Safety Plan ....................................................................................... 44
List of Tables
1-1 Summary of Test Program and Proposed Schedule .................................................. 6
1-2 Reporting Units and Emission Limits ................................................. : .................... 6
1-3 Test Personnel and Responsibilities ....................................................................... 8
2-1 Sampling Location ............................................................................................... 9
4-1 Example Emissions Results -Dillman 500 Portable Counter-flow HMA Plant, Kearns,
Utah ................................................................................................................. 19
List of Figures
3-1 EPA Methods 5/202 Sampling Train ..................................................................... 15
4-1 Typical Report Format ....................................................................................... 18
Kilgore Compan ies
2024 PM , PM ,o, PM 2.5, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley P it #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
P lant, Kearns, Utah
Page 4 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Summary of Test Program
Kilgore Companies, LLC (Kilgore) contracted Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC (Montrose)
to perform a particulate matter (PM), particulate matter less than 10 micron~ in
aerodynamic diameter (PM10), particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic
diameter (PM2.s) and visible emissions of opacity (VEOs) compliance emissions test program
on the outlet of the Dillman 500 TPH Portable Counter-flow Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Plant at
the West Valley Pit #10 HMA facility located in Kearns, Utah.
The tests are conducted to determine compliance with the emission limits listed in Approval
Order (AO) DAQE-AN105690012-19, issued by the State of Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality. A copy of the AO is attached as Appendix A-
3.
The specific objectives are to:
• Measure emissions of PM/PM10/PM2.s at the outlet of the Dillman 500 TPH
Portable Counter-flow HMA Plant, Natural Gas Drum Dryer, controlled by a
baghouse
• Determine the opacity of emissions (VEOs) at the outlet of the Dillman 500
TPH Portable Counter-flow HMA Plant, Natural Gas Drum Dryer, controlled by
a baghouse
• Conduct the test program with a focus on safety
Montrose will provide the test personnel and the necessary equipment to measure emissions
as outlined in this test plan. Facility personnel will provide the process and production data
to be included in the final report. A summary of the test program and proposed schedule is
presented in Table 1-1.
Ki lgore Com panies
2024 PM, PM ,o, PM 2 s, and VE Os Comp liance Sou rce Tes t P lan, Wes t Valley Pit #10 , Dil lman 500 TPH HMA
Plan t, Kearns , Utah
Page 5 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
Table 1-1
Summary of Test Program and Proposed Schedule
Proposed Unit ID/
TatDate(s) soureeNatne Adivfty /~rlirrletel'$
Velocity/Volumetric EPA 1, 2, 3A, 3 ~60 Flow Rate 4
Dillman 500
TPH Portable 02, CO2 EPA3A 3 ~60
June 19, 2024 Counter-flow ~60 Moisture EPA4 3
HMA
PM/PM 10/PM2.s EPA 5/202 3 ~60
Opacity EPA 9 3 ~6
To simplify this test plan, a list of Units and Abbreviations is included in Appendix A.
Throughout this test plan, chemical nomenclature, acronyms, and reporting units are not
defined. Please refer to the list for specific details.
1.2 Applicable Regulations and Emission Limits
The results from this test program are presented in units consistent with those listed in the
applicable regulations or requirements. The reporting units and emission limits are
presented in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2
'
Reporting Units and Emission Limits
Unit ID/
SourceName Parameter Reporting Units i:m
lb/hr virgin material 5.52
gr/dscf virgin material 0.024 AN105690012-Dillman 500 PM/PM 10/PM2.s .__ ________ --+--------<
TPH Portable
Counter-flow
HMA
Opacity
Kilgo re Companies
lb/hr RAP material
gr/dscf RAP material
%
6.44
0.028
20
19, §I1.B.2.c.
AN105690012-19,
§I1.B.2.c.1.
2024 PM , PM 1o, PM2 5, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Pla nt, Kea rns , Utah
Page 6 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
1.3 Key Personnel
A list of project participants is i ncluded below :
Facility Information
Source Location: Kilgore Companies
West Valley Pit #10
6200 West 5400 South
Project Contact:
Role:
Company:
Telephone:
Email:
Agency Information
Kearns, Utah 84118
Bryan Jorgensen
Environmental Manager
Kilgore Companies
801-250-0132
Bryan.Jorgensen@kilgorecompanies
.com
Regulatory Agency: State of Utah DEQ, Division of Air Quality
Agency Contact: Chad Gilgen, Minor Source
Compliance
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Testing Company Information
Testing Firm: Montrose Air Quality Services, LLC
Contact: Beckie Hawkins
Title: District Manager
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Kilgore Compan ies
Austin Tramell
Field Project Manager
801-645-2353
[e-mail]
2024 PM, PM ,o, PM 2s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Va ll ey Pit #10 , Di ll man 500 TPH HMA
Plant , Keams , Utah
Page 7 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
Tab le 1-3 det a il s t he roles and r espons i b il ities of the test tea m.
Table 1-3
Test Personnel and Responsibilities
Role
District Manager
Field Project Manager
Field Technician
Primary Assignment-
Coordinate Project
Operate mobile lab
Execute stack platform
responsibilities
Post-test follow up
Facility interface, test crew coordinatio n
Preparation, support PM
2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions
2.1 Process Description, Operation, and Control
Equipment
Kilgore currently operates an aggregate processing and hot mix asphalt (HMA) plant in
Kearns, Salt Lake County. To produce HMA, raw materials such as sand, coarse aggregate,
lime, fly ash, asphalt oil, and/or recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) is brought on site and
stored. Sand, coarse aggregate, and RAP are stockpiled; lime and fly ash are pneumatically
loaded into silos; and asphalt oil is unloaded into storage tanks. The stockpiled aggregate
materials are sized and sorted via crushers, conveyors and screens. The aggregate
materials are then dried and mixed with lime and asphalt in a heated mixer to produce
HMA. The finished HMA product is stored in silos on site and unloaded into trucks for sale
and distribution. This facility is powered via line power, with the exception of the natural
gas-fired, hot mix asphalt counter-flow drum burner. Particulate emissions are controlled
with a baghouse.
2.2 Flue Gas Sampling Location
Actual stack measurements, number of traverse points, and location of traverse points will
be evaluated in the field as part of the test program. Table 2-1 presents the anticipated
stack measurements and traverse points for the sampling locations listed.
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM, PM10, PM 2s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dil lman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Keams, Utah
Page 8 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
Table 2-1
Sampling Location
samplfng
LOcati6n
Dillman 500
Stack Inside
Diameter
(ih.)
TPH Portable 66.0 in . X
Counter-flow 66.0 in
HMA outlet
Distance from Nearest Disflirtianc:e,
DOwnstream EPA u
-S" (in /clia.') ~" (1~1,
212.0/3.21 39.0/0.59
Isokinetic : 25 (5/port)
Flow: 25 (5/port)
Gaseous: Single point or
3-point short line
The sample location is verified in the field to conform to EPA Method 1. Acceptable cyclonic
flow conditions are confirmed prior to testing using EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.
2.3 Operating Conditions and Process Data
Emission tests are performed while the source and air pollution control devices are
operating at the conditions required by the permit.
Plant personnel are responsible for establishing the test conditions and collecting all
applicable unit-operating data. Data collected includes the following parameters:
• Throughput, tons per hour (ton/hr or tph)
• Static pressure drop across the HMA baghouse (inches of water column or in.
we)
• Asphalt mix temperature (°F)
2.4 Plant Safety
Montrose will comply with all safety requirements at the facility. The facility Client Sponsor,
or designated point of contact, is responsible for ensuring routine compliance with plant
entry, health, and safety requirements. The Client Sponsor has the authority,, to impose or
waive facility restrictions. The Montrose test team leader has the authority to negotiate any
deviations from the facility restrictions with the Client Sponsor. Any deviations must be
documented.
2.4.1 Safety Responsibilities
Planning
• Montrose must complete a fie ld review with the Client Sponsor prior to the
project date. The purpose of the review is to develop a scope of work that
identifies the conditions, equipment, methods, and physical locations that will
be utilized along with any policies or procedures that will affect our work.
• We must reach an agreement on the proper use of client emergency services
and ensure that proper response personnel are available, as needed.
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM, PM 10, PM 2s , and VEOs Compl iance Source Test P lan, West Va ll ey P it #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 9 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
• The potential for chemical exposure and actions to be taken in case of
exposure must be communicated to Montrose. This information must include
expected concentrations of the chemicals and the equipment used to identify
the substances.2
• Montrose will provide a list of equipment being brought to the site, if required
by the client.
Project Day
• Montrose personnel will arrive with the appropriate training and credentials
for the activities they will be performing and the equipment that they will
operate.
• Our team will meet daily to review the Project Scope, Job Hazard Assessment,
and Work Permits. The Client Sponsor and Operations Team are invited to
participate.
• Montrose will provide equipment that can interface with the client utilities
previously identified in the planning phase and only work with equipment that
our client has made ready and prepared for connection.
• We will follow client direction regarding driving safety, safe work permitting,
staging of equipment, and other crafts or work in the area.
• As per 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart A, Section 60.8, the facility must provide the
following provisions at each sample location:
o Sampling ports, which meet EPA minimum requirements for testing. The
caps should be removed or be hand-tight.
o Safe sampling platforms.
o Safe access to the platforms and test ports, including any scaffolding or
man lifts.
o Sufficient utilities to perform all necessary testing.
• Montrose will use the client communication system, as directed, in case of
plant or project emergency.
• Any adverse conditions, unplanned shutdowns or other deviations to the
agreed scope and project plan must be reviewed with the Client Sponsor prior
to continuing work. This will include any safe work permit and hazard
assessment updates.
Completion
• Mo nt rose personnel will report any process concerns, incidents or near misses
to the Client Sponsor prior to leaving the site.
• Montrose will clean up our work area to the same condition as it was prior to
our arrival.
• We will ensure that all utilities, connection points or equipment have been
returned to the pre-project condition or as stated in the safe work permit. In
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM , PM 10, PM 2 s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan, West Valley Pit #10 , DIiiman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 10 of 58 GP 0SlAS-041316-PP-848
addition, we will walk out the job completion with Operations and the Client
Sponsor if required by the facility.
2.4.2 Safety Program and Requirements
Montrose has a comprehensive health and safety program that satisfies State and Federa l
OSHA requirements. The program includes an Illness and Injury Prevention Program, site-
specific safety meetings, and training in safety awareness and procedures. The basic
elements include:
• All regulatory required policies/procedures and training for OSHA, EPA and
FMCSA
• Medical monitoring, as necessary
• Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and chemical detection equipment
• Hazard communication
• Pre-test and daily toolbox meetings
• Continued evaluation of work and potential hazards
• Near-miss and incident reporting procedures as required by Montrose and the
Client
Montrose will provide standard PPE to employees. The PPE will include but is not limited to;
hard hats, safety shoes, glasses with side shields or goggles, hearing protection, hand
protections, and fall protection. In addition, our trailers are equipped with four gas detectors
to ensure that workspace has no unexpected equipment leaks or other ambient hazards.
The detailed Site Safety Plan for this project is attached to this test plan in Appendix "S".
3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures
3.1 Test Methods
The test methods for this test program have been presented in Table 1-1. Additional
information regarding specific applications or modifications to standard procedures is
presented below.
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM, PM 10, PM 2s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan, West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 11 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
3 .1 .1 EPA Method 1 , Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary
Sources
EPA Method 1 is used to assure that representative measurements of volumetric flow rate
are obtained by dividing the cross-section of the stack or duct into equal areas, and then
locating a traverse point within each of the equal areas. Acceptable sample locations must
be located at least two stack or duct equivalent diameters downstream from a flow
disturbance and one-half equivalent diameter upstream from a flow disturbance.
3.1.2 EPA Method 2, Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and
Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pitot Tube)
EPA Method 2 is used to measure the gas velocity using an 5-type pitot tube connected to a
pressure measurement device, and to measure the gas temperature using a calibrated
thermocouple connected to a thermocouple indicator. Typically, Type S (Stausscheibe) pitot
tubes conforming to the geometric specifications in the test method are used, along with an
inclined manometer. The measurements are made at traverse points specified by EPA
Method 1. The molecular weight of the gas stream is determined from independent
measurements of 02, CO2, and moisture. The stack gas volumetric flow rate is calculated
using the measured average velocity head, the area of the duct at the measurement plane,
the measured average temperature, the measured duct static pressure, the molecular
weight of the gas stream, and the measured moisture.
Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:
• 5-type pitot tube coefficient is 0.84.
• Shortridge multimeter may be used to measure velocity.
The typical sampling system is detailed as part of the EPA Method 5/202 sampling train in
Figure 3-1.
3.1 .3 EPA Method 3, Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry
Molecular Weight
EPA Method 3 is used to calculate the dry molecular weight of the stack gas by measuring
the percent 02 and CO2 in the gas stream. A gas sample is extracted from the stack by one
of the following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated
sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is analyzed for percent
CO2 and percent 02 using either an Orsat or a Fyrite analyzer.
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM, PM ,o, PM2 ,, and VE Os Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 12 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below :
• Method Options:
o A Fyrite-type combustion gas analyzer is used to measure the analyte
concentrations
o An Orsat analyzer is used to measure the analyte concentrations
o Single-point grab sampling is performed
o Single-point integrated sampling is performed
o Less than 28 L (1.0 ft3 ) is collected
o Multi-point integrated sampling is performed
• Target and/or Minimum Required Sample Duration: 60 minutes
• Target and/or Minimum Recommended Sample Volume: 1.0 ft3
• Target Analytes: 02 and CO2
3.1.4 EPA Method 4, Determination of Moisture Content in Stack
Gas
EPA Method 4 is a manual method used to measure the moisture content of gas streams.
Gas is sampled at a constant sampling rate through a probe and impinger train. Moistur_e is
removed using a series of pre-weighed impingers containing methodology-specific liquids
and silica gel immersed in an ice water bath. The impingers are weighed after each run to
determine the percent moisture.
Pertinent information regarding the performance of the method is presented below:
• Condensed water is measured gravimetrically
• Moisture sampling is performed as part of the EPA Method 5/202 sample trains
• Since it is theoretically impossible for measured moisture to be higher than
psychrometric moisture, the psychrometric moisture is also calculated, and the lower
moisture value is used in the calculations
• Target Sample Duration: 60 minutes
• Minimum Required Sample Volume: 21 scf
As the EPA Method 5/202 sampling train will be used to collect moisture, sampling will not
be constant; rather, sampling will be isokinetic as per the criteria set forth in EPA Methods
5/202.
The typical sampling system is detailed as part of the EPA Method 5/202 sampling train in
Figure 3-1.
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM, PM IO, PM2,, and VEOs Compliance Sou rce Test Plan, West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 13 of 58 GPOS lAS-041316-PP-848
3.1.5 EPA Methods 5 and 202, Determination of Particulate Matter
from Stationary Sources and Dry Impinger Method for
Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from
Stationary Sources
EPA Methods 5 and 202 are m anua l, isokinetic methods used t o measure FPM and CPM
emissions. The methods are performed in conjunction with EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, and 4. The
stack gas is sampled through a nozzle, probe, heated filter, unheated CPM filter, condenser,
and impinger train. FPM is collected from the probe and heater filter. CPM is collected from
the unheated CPM filter and the impinger train. The samples are analyzed gravimetrically.
The sum of FPM and CPM represents TPM. The FPM, CPM, and TPM results are reported in
emission concentration and emission rate units. Pertinent information regarding the
performance of the method is presented below:
• Glass sample nozzles and probe liners are used
• Condensed water is measured gravimetrically
• As an alternative to baking glassware, a field train proof blank sample may be
recovered
• If no water is collected before the CPM filter, the post-test nitrogen purge will be
omitted
• The post-test nitrogen purge may be performed using the sampling system meter
box and vacuum pump
• The post-test nitrogen purge may be performed by passing nitrogen through the
train under pressure
• Method 5/202 total PM results will be used to demonstrate compliance with the
individual PM, PM10 and PM2.s emission limits
• Target Sample Duration: 60 minutes
• Minimum Required Sample Volume: 31.8 dscf (0.90 dscm)
• Method Options:
o EPA Approved Alternative Method 009 (ALT-009) is used as an alternative to
a two-point post-test meter box calibration. This procedure uses a calculation
to check the meter box calibration factor rather than requiring a physical
post-test meter box calibration using a standard dry gas meter. The average
calculated meter box percent(%) error must result in a percent error within
±5% of Y. If not, a full calibration is performed, and the results are presented
using the Y factor that yields the highest emissions.
The typical sampling system is detailed in Figure 3-1.
K ilgore Companies
2024 PM . PM 10, PM2.s, and VEOs Comp li ance Source Test Plan, Wes t Valley Pit #10 , Dill man 500 TPH HMA
P lant, Kearns, Utah
Page 14 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
Figure 3-1
EPA Methods 5/202 Sampling Train
Tl-ffiVOCClR.E ! f-&TB:)FRCcE
l\l:22lE----<>
TYFE"S'
RTOf
~ ------0
~
f-EATB:)
PftA
1H3'MXO..R..E
RLlml-0.ilR
11-ERYtXXl.R.E
1COn1,;,o
(modied /"' ti~ 2D-:a::Q;i
rnYGIIS
!VETER
BY-PPSSVAL 'vE
911caG'1
(mrilfie:;t/roti~
!fin,-VPO...UMGAUGE
J
3.1.6 EPA Method 9, Visual Determination of the Opacity of
Emissions
VPO...UM
<!--LINE
/>OIIPTCR
VKl.JLM
<1--LINE
EPA Method 9 is used to observe the visual opacity of emissions (opacity). The observer
stands at a distance sufficient to provide a clear view of the emissions with the sun oriented
in the 140° sector to their back. The line of vision is perpendicular to the plume direction
and does not include more than one plume diameter. Observations are recorded at 15-
second intervals and are made to the nearest 5% opacity. The qualified obsE;rver is certified
according to the requirements of EPA Method 9, section 3.1.
• Observations are attempted to be made during each concurrent particulate run,
unless weather conditions are unfavorable.
• Total Observation Period Duration: 6 minutes (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart I)
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM , PM 10, PM 2s, and VEOs Compliance Sou rce Test P lan, W est Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant , Kearns , Utah
Page 15 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
4.0 Quality Assurance and Reporting
4.1 QA Audits
Montrose has instituted a rigorous QA/QC program for its a i r quality testi ng . 'Quality
assurance audits are performed as part of the test program to ensure that the results are
calculated using the highest quality data available. This program ensures that the emissions
data we report are as accurate as possible. The procedures included in the cited reference
methods are followed during preparation, sampling, calibration, and analysis. Montrose is
responsible for preparation, calibration, and cleaning of the sampling apparatus. Montrose
will also perform the sampling, sample recovery, storage, and shipping. Approved contract
laboratories may perform some of the preparation and sample analyses, as needed.
4.2 Quality Control Procedures
Montrose calibrates and maintains equipment as required by the methods performed and
applicable regulatory guidance. Montrose follows internal procedures to prevent the use of
malfunctioning or inoperable equipment in test programs. All equipment is operated by
trained personnel. Any incidence of nonconforming work encountered during testing is
reported and addressed through the corrective action system.
4.2.1 Equipment Inspection and Maintenance
Each piece of field equipment that requires calibration is assigned a unique identification
number to allow tracking of its calibration history. All field equipment is visually inspected
prior to testing and includes pre-test calibration checks as required by the test method or
regulatory agency.
4.2.2 Audit Samples
When required by the test method and available, Montrose obtains EPA TNI SSAS audit
samples from an accredited provider for analysis along with the samples. Currently, the
SSAS program has been suspended pending the availability of a second accredited audit
sample provider. If the program is reinstated, the audit samples will be order ed. If required
as part of the test program, the audit samples are stored, shipped, and analyzed along with
the emissions samples collected during the test program. The audit sample results are
reported along with the emissions sample results.
4.3 Data Analysis and Validation
Montrose converts the raw field, laboratory, and process data to reporting units consistent
with the permit or subpart. Calculations are made using proprietary computer spreadsheets
or data acquisition systems. One run of each test method is also verified using a separate
example calculation. The example calculations are checked against the spreadsheet results
and are included in the final report. The "Standard Conditions" for this project are 29.92
inches of mercury and 68 °F.
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM , PM ,o, PM 2 6, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan, West Valley Pit #10 , Di llman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 16 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
4.4 Sample Identification and Custody
The on-site Field Project Manager will assume or assign the role of sample and data
custodian until relinquishing custody. The sample custodian will follow proper custody
procedures before departing from the test site including:
• Assign the unique sample identification number to each sample.
• Attach sample labels and integrity seals to all samples.
• Complete COC form(s), ensuring that the sample identification numbers on
the samples match the sample identification numbers on the COC.
• Pack and store samples in accordance with the test method requirements in
appropriate transport containers for protection from breakage, contamination,
or loss.
• Keep samples in a secure locked area if not in the direct presence of Montrose
staff.
The sample custodian will follow proper custody procedures upon arriving at the Montrose
office including:
• Remove samples and COC documents from vehicles and check into
designated secure sample holding areas.
• Store samples requiring additional measures such as refrigeration or dry ice
appropriately.
4.5 Quality Statement
Montrose is qualified to conduct this test program and has established a quality
management system that led to accreditation with ASTM Standard D7036-04 (Standard
Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies). Montrose participates in annual
functional assessments for conformance with D7036-04 which are conducted by the
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). All testing performed by Montrose
is supervised on site by at least one Qualified Individual (QI) as defined in D7036-04
Section 8.3.2. Data quality objectives for estimating measurement uncertainty within the
documented limits in the test methods are met by using approved test protocols for each
project as defined in D7036-04 Sections 7.2.1 and 12.10. Additional quality assurance
information is included in the appendices. The content of this test plan is modeled after the
EPA Emission Measurement Center Guideline Document (GD-042).
4.6 Reporting
Montrose will prepare a final report to present the test data, calculations/equations,
descriptions, and results. Prior to release by Montrose, each report is reviewed and certified
by the project manager and their supervisor, or a peer. Source test reports will be
submitted to the facility or appropriate regulatory agency (upon customer approval) within
30 days of the completion of the field work. The report will include a series of appendices to
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM, PM ,o , PM 2 s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 17 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
present cop ies of the i ntermediate calculations and example calcu lations, r aw field dat a,
laboratory analysis data, process data, and equipment calibration data.
4.6.1 Example Report Format
T he report is divided into various sections describing the different aspects of the source
testing program. Figure 4-1 presents a typical Table of Contents for the final report.
Figure 4-1
Typical Report Format
Cover Page
Certification of Report
Table of Contents
Section
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Descriptions
3.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures
4.0 Test Discussion and Results
5.0 Internal QA/QC Activities
Appendices
A Field Data and Calculations
B Facility Process Data
C Laboratory Analysis Data
D Quality Assurance/Quality Control
E Regulatory Information
4.6.2 Example Presentation of Test Results
Table 4-1 p r esents the typical tabu la r fo r mat that is used to summarize the results in the
final source test report. Separate tables will outline the results for each target analyte and
compare them to their respective emissions limits.
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM , PM,o , PM, s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns, Utah
Page 18 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
Table 4-1
Example Emissions Results -
Dillman 500 Portable Counter-flow HMA Plant, Kearns, Utah
Parameter/Units R1811 Run 2 -
i~
Date xx xx xx xx
Time xx xx xx xx
Process Data .
Throughput, ton/hr xx xx xx xx
Baghouse Static Pressure, in. wc xx xx xx xx
Asphalt Mix Temperature, 0 f xx xx xx xx
Sampling & Flue Gas Parameters
02, % volume dry xx xx xx xx
CO2,% volume dry xx xx xx xx
flue gas temperature, 0 f xx xx xx xx
moisture content, % volume xx xx xx xx
volumetric flow rate, dscfm xx xx xx xx
PM/PM10/PM2.s Results (Virgin or RAP)
Concentration, gr/dscf xx xx xx xx
Emission rate, lb/hr xx xx xx xx
Opacity of Emissions Results
Opacity,% xx xx xx xx
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM, PM 10, PM 2 s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 19 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
Kilgore Companies
Appendix A
Supporting Information
2024 PM , PMw, PM 25, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan, West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns. Utah
Page 20 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
KIigore Companies
Appendix A.1
Units and Abbreviations
2 024 PM , PM ,o , PMu, and VEOs Complian ce Sou rce Test P lan , West Va ll ey Pit #10 , Di ll man 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Kearns , Utah
Page 21 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
@X%02
ICCJ
ldl oc
OF
OR
"H20
13.6
.t.H
.t.P
8
µg
Pa
Pw
acfm
An
As
Btu
Bws
Ca
CAvg
Cm,
cf or ft3
cfm
CGas
CM
cm or m3
CMA
Co
Cµ
c.
cs
Cs
Cv
D
def
dcm
Dn
o.
dscf
dscfm
dscm
Fd
fpm
fps
ft
tt2
g
gal
gr
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT
corrected to X% oxygen (corrected for dilution air)
absolute value of the confidence coefficient
absolute value of the mean differences
degrees Celsius
degrees Fahrenheit
degrees Rankine
inches of water column
specific gravity of mercury
pressure drop across orifice meter, inches H20
velocity head of stack gas, inches H20
total sampling time, minutes
microgram
density of acetone, mg/ml
density of water, 0.9982 g/ml or 0.002201 lb/ml
actual cubic feet of gas per minute at stack conditions
cross-sectional area of nozzle, tt2
cross-sectional area of stack, square feet (fl2)
British thermal unit
proportion by volume of water vapor in gas stream
particulate matter concentration in stack gas, gr/acf
average unadjusted gas concentration, ppmv
measured concentration of calibration gas, ppmv
cubic feet
cubic feet per minute
average gas concentration adjusted for bias, ppmv
average of initial and final system bias check responses from upscale calibration gas, ppmv
cubic meters
actual concentration of the upscale calibration gas, ppmv
average of initial and final system bias check responses from low-level calibration gas, ppmv
pitot tube coefficient
particulate matter concentration in stack gas, gr/dscf
calibration span, % or ppmv
measured concentration of calibration gas, ppmv
manufactured certified concentration of calibration gas, ppmv
drift assessment, % of span
dry cubic feet
dry cubic meters
diameter of nozzle, inches
diameter of stack, inches
dry standard cubic feet
dry standard cubic feet per minute
dry standard cubic meters
F-factor, dscf/MMBtu of heat input
feet per minute
feet per second
feet
square feet
gram
gallons
grains (7000 grains per pound)
Page 22 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
gr/dscf
hr
I
in
k
K
K3
Ki
kg
KP
kwscfh
I
lb/hr
lb/MMBtu
1pm
m
M
m3
ma
Md
meq
mg
Mg
min
ml ormL
mm
MM
MMBtu/hr
mn
mol
mol. wt. or MW
Ms
MW
n
ng
nm
Nm3
Pbar
pg
Pg
Pm
ppb
ppbv
ppbvd
ppm
ppmv
ppmvd
ppmvw
Ps
psi
psia
psig
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT
grains per dry standard cubic feet
hour
percent of isokinetic sampling
inch
kilo or thousand (metric units, multiply by 103)
kelvin (temperature)
conversion factor 0.0154 gr/mg
conversion factor 0.002668 ((in. Hg}(ft3 })/((ml)(0 R))
kilogram
pitot tube constant (85.49 ft/sec)
thousand wet standard cubic feet per hour
liters
pounds per hour
pounds per million Btu
liters per minute
meter or milli
thousand (English units) or mega (million, metric units)
cubic meters
mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg
molecular weight of stack gas; dry basis, lb/lb-mole
milliequivalent
milligram
megagram (106 grams)
minute
milliliter
millimeter
million (English units)
million Btu per hour
total amount of particulate matter collected, mg
mole
molecular weight
molecular weight of stack gas; wet basis, lb/lb-mole
molecular weight or megawatt
number of data points
nanogram
nanometer
normal cubic meter
barometric pressure, inches Hg
picogram
stack static pressure, inches H2 O
barometric pressure of dry gas meter, inches Hg
parts per billion
parts per billion, by volume
parts per billion by volume, dry basis
parts per million
parts per million, by volume
parts per million by volume, dry basis
parts per million by volume, wet basis
absolute stack gas pressure, inches Hg
pounds per square inch
pounds per square inch absolute
pounds per square inch gauge
Page 23 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
Pstd
Oa
a.
Ostd
R
SBfinal
S81
scf
scfh
scfm
scm
scmh
sec
sf, sq. ft., or tt2
std
t
T o.e1s
Ta
Tm
ton or t
tph or tons/hr
tpy or tons/yr
Ts
Tstd
V
Va
Yaw
V,c
Vm
Vm{std)
Yma
Vn
v.
Ywc{std)
Vwi{std)
Ywsg(std)
w
Wa
W;mp
Wsg
y
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT
standard absolute pressure, 29.92 inches Hg
volumetric flow rate, actual conditions, acfm
volumetric flow rate, standard conditions, scfm
volumetric flow rate, dry standard conditions, dscfm
ideal gas constant 21.85 ((in. Hg) (ft3l)/((0 R) (lbmole))
post-run system bias check, % of span
pre-run system bias check, % of span
standard cubic feet
standard cubic feet per hour
standard cubic feet per minute
standard cubic meters
standard cubic meters per hour
second
square feet
standard
metric ton (1000 kg)
t-value
absolute average ambient temperature, 0 R (+459.67 for English)
absolute average dry gas meter temperature, 0 R (+459.67 for English}
ton = 2000 pounds
tons per hour
tons per year
absolute average stack gas meter temperature, 0 R (+459.67 for English)
absolute temperature at standard conditions
volt
volume of acetone blank, ml
volume of acetone used in wash, ml
total volume H20 collected in impingers and silica gel, grams
volume of gas sampled through dry gas meter, ft 3
volume of gas measured by the dry gas meter, corrected to standard conditions, dscf
stack gas volume sampled, acf
volume collected at stack conditions through nozzle, acf
average stack gas velocity, feet per second
volume of water vapor condensed, corrected to standard conditions, scf
volume of water vapor in gas sampled from impingers, scf
volume of water vapor in gas sampled from silica gel, scf
watt
weight of residue in acetone wash, mg
total weight of impingers, grams
total weight of silica gel, grams
dry gas meter calibration factor, dimensionless
Page 24 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
AAS
ACDP
ACE
AD
ADL
AETB
AS
ASTM
BACT
BDL
BHP
BIF
BLS
cc
CD
CE
CEM
CEMS
GERMS
CET
CFR
CGA
CHNOS
CNCG
co
coc
COMS
CPM
CPMS
CT
CTM
CTO
CVAAS
De
DE
Dioxins
DLL
DNCG
ECD
EIT
ELCD
EMPC
EPA
EPRI
ES
ESP
EU
FCCU
FGD
Fl
FIA
FID
FPD
FPM
ABBREVIATIONS
atomic absorption spectroscopy
air contaminant discharge permit
analyzer calibration error, percent of span
absolute difference
above detection limit
Air Emissions Testing Body
applicable standard {emission limit)
American Society For Testing And Materials
best achievable control technology
below detection limit
brake horsepower
boiler and industrial furnace
black liquor solids
confidence coefficient
calibration drift
calibration error
continuous emissions monitor
continuous emissions monitoring system
continuous emissions rate monitoring system
calibration error test
Code of Federal Regulations
cylinder gas audit
elemental analysis for determination of C, H, N, 0, and S content in fuels
concentrated non-condensable gas
catalytic oxidizer
chain of custody
continuous opacity monitoring system
condensable particulate matter
continuous parameter monitoring system
combustion turbine
conditional test method
catalytic thermal oxidizer
cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy
equivalent diameter
destruction efficiency
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins {PCDDs)
detection level limited
dilute non-condensable gas
electron capture detector
Engineer In Training
electrolytic conductivity detector {hall detector)
estimated maximum possible concentration
US Environmental Protection Agency
Electric Power Research Institute
emission standard {applicable limit)
electrostatic precipitator
emission unit
fluid catalytic cracking unit
flue gas desulfurization
flame ionization
flame ionization analyzer
flame ionization detector
flame photometric detector
filterable particulate matter
Page 25 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
FTIR
FTPB
FTRB
Furans
GC
GC/MS
GFMS
GFC
GHG
HAP
HC
HHV
HPLC
HRGC/HRMS
HRSG
IC
ICAP
ICPCR
ICP-MS
IR
ISO
kW
LFG
LHV
LPG
MACT
MDI
MDL
MNOC
MRL
MS
NA
NCASI
NCG
ND
NDIR
NESHAP
NG
NIOSH
NIST
NMC
NMOC
NMVOC
NPD
NSPS
OSHA
PAH
PCB
PCWP
PE
PFAS
Pl
PIO
PM
ABBREVIATIONS
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
field train proof blank
field train recovery blank
polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)
gas chromatography
gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy
graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy
gas filter correlation
greenhouse gas
hazardous air pollutant
hydrocarbons
higher heating value
high performance liquid chromatography
high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectroscopy
heat recovery steam generator
ion chromatography
inductively-coupled argon plasma emission spectroscopy
ion chromatography with a post-column reactor
inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy
infrared radiation
International Standards Organization
kilowatts
landfill gas
lower heating value
liquified petroleum gas
maximum achievable control technology
methylene diphenyl diisocyanate
method detection limit
maximum normal operating conditions
method reporting limit
mass spectrometry
not applicable or not available
National Council For Air And Steam Improvement
non-condensable gases
not detected
non-dispersive infrared
National Emissions Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants
natural gas
National Institute For Occupational Safety And Health
National Institute Of Standards And Technology
non-methane cutter
non-methane organic compounds
non-methane volatile organic compounds
nitrogen phosphorus detector
New Source Performance Standards
Occupational Safety And Health Administration
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
polychlorinated biphenyl compounds
plywood and composite wood products
Professional Engineer
per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
photoionization
photoionization detector
particulate matter
Page 26 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
PM 10
PM2.s
POM
PS
PSD
PSEL
PST
PTE
PTM
QA/QC
QI
QSTI
RA
RAA
RACT
RATA
RCTO
RICE
RM
RTO
SAM
SCD
SCR
SD
Semi-VOST
SRM
TAP
TBD
TCA
TCD
TGNENMOC
TGNMOC
TGOC
THC
TIC
TO
TO
TPM
TSP
TTE
ULSD
UV
VE
voe
VOST
WC
WWTP
ABBREVIATIONS
particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter
particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter
polycyclic organic matter
performance specification
particle size distribution
plant site emission limits
performance specification test
permanent total enclosure
performance test method
quality assurance and quality control
Qualified Individual
Qualified Source Testing Individual
relative accuracy
relative accuracy audit
reasonably available control technology
relative accuracy test audit
rotary concentrator thermal oxidizer
stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine
reference method
regenerative thermal oxidizer
sulfuric acid mist
sulfur chemiluminescent detector
selective catalytic reduction system
standard deviation
semi-volatile organic compounds sample train
standard reference material
toxic air pollutant
to be determined
thermal conductivity analyzer
thermal conductivity detector
total gaseous non-ethane non-methane organic compounds
total gaseous non-methane organic compounds
total gaseous organic compounds
total hydrocarbons
tentatively identified compound
thermal oxidizer
toxic organic (as in EPA Method TO-15)
total particulate matter
total suspended particulate matter
temporary total enclosure
ultra-low sulfur diesel
ultraviolet radiation range
visible emissions
volatile organic compounds
volatile organic sample train
water column
waste water treatment plant
Page 27 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE
Ag silver Se selenium
As arsenic S02 sulfur dioxide
Ba barium S03 sulfur trioxide
Be beryllium SOx sulfur oxides
C carbon TCDD tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
Cd cadmium TCDF tetrachlorodibenzofuran
CdS cadmium sulfide TGOC total gaseous organic concentration
CH20 formaldehyde THC total hydrocarbons
CH3CHO acetaldehyde Tl thallium
CH30H methanol TRS total reduced sulfur compounds
CH4 methane Zn zinc
C2H40 ethylene oxide
C2Hs ethane
C3 H40 acrolein
C3 H6 0 propionaldehyde
CsHa propane
C6 H5 0H phenol
Cl 2 chlorine
CI02 chlorine dioxide
co carbon monoxide
Co cobalt
CO2 carbon dioxide
Cr chromium
Cu copper
EtO ethylene oxide
EtOH ethyl alcohol (ethanol)
H2 hydrogen
H20 water
H202 hydrogen peroxide
H2S hydrogen sulfide
H2S04 sulfuric acid
HCI hydrogen chloride
Hg mercury
IPA isopropyl alcohol
MDI methylene diphenyl diisocyanate
MeCl2 methylene chloride
MEK methyl ethyl ketone
MeOH methanol
Mn manganese
Nz nitrogen
NH3 ammonia
Ni nickel
NO nitric oxide
N02 nitrogen dioxide
NOx nitrogen oxides
02 oxygen
p phosphorus
Pb lead
PCDD polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
PCDF polychlorinated dibenzofurans
Sb antimony
Page 28 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
Appendix A.2
Accreditation Information/Certifications
KIigore Companies
2024 PM, PM,o, PM , 5, and VEOs Compli ance Source Test Plan, West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 T PH HMA
Plant, Kearns, Utah
Page 29 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
STA<! A m erican Association for Laboratory Accre d itatio n
STACK TESTING ACCREDITATION COUNCIL
Accredited Air Emission Testing Body
A2LA has accredited
MONTROSE AIR QUALITY SERVICES
In recognition of the successful completion of the joint A2LA and Stack Testing Accreditation Council (STAC)
evaluation process, this laboratory is accredited to perform testing activities in compliance with
ASTM D7036:2004 -Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies .
Pr"'L 27~ day of February 2024 .
Vice President, Accreditation Service s
For the Accreditation Council
Certificate Number 3925.01
Valid to February 28, 2026
This accreditation program is not included under the A2LA ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement .
Page 30 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
Appendix A.3
AO DAQE-AN0105690012-19
Kilgore Companies
2024 PM , PM 10 , PM 25 , and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plan t , Kearns , Utah
Page 31 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
State of Utah
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
SPENCER J. COX
Lieutenant Governor
April 30, 2019
' Lee Ware
Department of
Environmental Quality
Alan Matheson
Executive Director
DNISION OF AIR QUALITY
Btyce C. Bird
Director
Kilgore Contracting, LLC
P.O. Box 869
Magna, UT 84044
Dear Mr. Ware:
DAQE-AN105690012-19
Re: Approval Order: Administrative Amendment to Approval Order DAQE-AN0105690009-10 for
Administrative Changes
Project Number: Nl0569-0012
The attached document is the Approval Order for the above-referenced project. Future correspondence
on this Approval Order should include the engineer's name as well as the DAQE number as shown on the
upper right~hand corner of this letter. The project engineer for this action is Ana Williams, who may be
reached at [phone]. 4-y~
Bryce C. Bird
Director
BCB:AW:sa
?e_u: C,(!1-I 4-,,JJ__
/J-o
cc: Salt Lake County Department ~'.\\.)11/
195 North 1950 West• Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printe'paJ~o/~'1c~f''lf~per GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
t
I
I
STATE OF UTAH ·
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
APPROVAL ORDER: Administrative Amendment to Approval
Order DAQE-AN0105690009-10 for Administrative Changes
Prepared By: Ana Williams, Engineer
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
APPROVAL ORDER NUMBER
DAQE-AN105690012-19
Date:_ April 30, 2019
Kilgore Contracting, LLC
West Valley Pit #10
Source Contact:
Lee .Ware, Environmental Manager
Phone: [phone] Ext 1412 .
Email: [e-mail]
Bryce C. Bird
Director
Page 33 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
Abstract
Kilgore Companies, LLC dba Kilgore Co~b:a~iing (Kilg~re) ciperates the West Valley Pit #10 in West
Valley, Salt Lake County. Kilgore has requested an ad:ministrative amendment to AO DAQE-
AN0105690009-10, dated June 8, 2010, to revise the plant jaw crusher configuration and plant screen
configuration under UAC R307-401-12, Reduction in Air Pollutants, replace the asphalt plant drum and
burner under UAC R307-401-l l, Replacement-in-Kind Equipment, and update AO conditions. The PTE
for the source will remain the same with these changes.
'
Salt Lake County is a NAA of the NAAQS f.9r ozone, PM2.s, PM 10 , and SO2, and an attainment area for (
all other criteria pollutants. NSPS (40 CFR 60 Subparts A, I, and 000) andMACT (40 CFR 63 Subparts
A and ZZZZ) regulatiqns apply to this source. NESHAP ( 40 CFR 61) regulations do not apply to this
source. The Kilgore West Valley Pit #10 is a Title V area source.
The PTE, in TPY, will remain as follows: PM 10 = 40.85, PM2.s (subset of PM10) = 40.85, NOx = 42.73,
SO2 = 7.51, CO= 80.34, VOC = 27.23, and HAPs = 3.92.
This air quality AO authorizes the project with the following conditions and failure to comply with any of
the conditions may constitute a violation of this order; This AO is issued to, and applies to the following:
Name of Permittee: Permitted Location:
Kilgore Contracting, LLC
PO Box 869
West Valley Pit #10
6200 West 5400 South
Keams, UT 84118 Magna, UT 84044
UTM coordinates: 411,500 m Easting, 4,500,500 m Northing, UTM Zone 12
I.1
I.2
I.3
I.4
I.5
UTM Datum: NAD27 .
SIC code: 1442 (C.onstruction Sand & Gravel)
Section I: GENERAL PROVISIONS
All definitions, terms, abbreviations, and references used in this AO conform to those used in
the UAC R307 and 40 CFR. Unless noted otherwise, references cited in these AO conditions
refer to those rules. [R.307-101]
The limits set forth in this AO shall not be exceeded without prior approval. [R307-401]
Modifications to the equipment or pro.cesses approved by this AO that could affect the
emissions covered by this AO must be reviewed and approved. [R.307-401-1]
All records referenced in this AO or in other applicable rules, which are required to be kept by
the owner/operator, shall be made available to the Director or Director's representative upon
request, and the records shall include the two (2) year period prior to the date of the request.
Unless otherwise specified in this AO or in other applicable state and federal rules, records shall
be kept for a minimum of two (2) years. [R307-401-8]
At all times, including periods of start-up, shutdown; and malfunction, owners and operators
shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate any equipment approved under this AO,
including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air
pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable
operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to
the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, opacity observations,
review of operating and maintenance procedures, ahd inspection of the source. All maintenance
performed on equipment authorized by this AO shall be recorded. [R307-401-4]
Page 34 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
DAQE-AN105690012-19
Page 3 ·
I.6 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-107. General Requirements: Breakdowns.
[R307-107] ·
I, 7 The owner/operator shall comply with UAC R307-150 Series. Emission Inventories.
[R307-150]
IT.A
II.Al
II.A2
II.A3
II.A.4
II.AS
II.A6
II.A?
II.AS
II.A9
II.AlO
II.All
II.A12
II.Al3
II.Al4
II.A15
II.A.1.6
' Section IT: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
. The approved installations shall consist of the following equipment:
Kilgore
West Vi;uleyPit #10
Two (2) Jaw Crushers
Capacity: 500 tph each
Three (3) Cone or Impact Crushers
Capacity: 250 tph each
Four ( 4) Screens
Capacity: Three (3) 250 tph each and one (1) 500 tph
.Four (4) Feeder/Hoppers
One (1) Counter Flow Continuous Mix Asphalt Plant
Capacity: 500 tph
Burner Rating: 125 MMBtu/hr
One (1) Baghouse
Capacity: 109,000 acfm
Two (2) Liquid Asphalt Storage Tanks
Capacity: 35,000 gallons each
Six (6) Asphalt Storage Silos
Capacity: 300 tons each
One (1) Lime Silo
Eight (8) Cold Feed Storage Bin~
Two (2) Fuel Storage Tanks
Capacity: 30,000 gallons each
One (1) Fuel/Petroleum Storage Tank
Capacity: 250,000 gallons
· One (1) Ce~tral Mix Concrete :Batch Plant
Capacity: 200 cubic yards per hour
One:(1) Truck Mix Concrete Batch Plant
Capacity: 120 cubic yards per hour
One (1) Flyash Silo
Capacity: 40 ton
Page 35 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
DAQE-AN105690012-19
Page4
II.A.17
II.A.18
II.A.19
II.A.20
II.A.21
II.A.22
II.A.23
II.A.24
II.B
II.BJ
II.B.1.a
One (1) Flyash Silo
Capacity: 140 ton
One (1) Cement Silo
Capacity: 60 ton
One (1) Cement Silo
Capacity: 140 ton
One (1) Natural Gas Boiler
Capacity: 9.0 MMBTU/hr
One (1) Diesel Generator
Rating: 565 kW
One (1) Diesel Generator
Rating: 370 kW
One (1) Diesel Generator
Rating: 365 kW
Miscellaneous Equipment
Includes: Conveyors, Stackers, Loaders, Dozers, Material Haul Trucks, Water Trucks, and
Small Fuel Storage Tanks
Requirements and Limitations
Pit #10 shall be subject to the following:
The following production and/or consumption limits shall not be exceeded:
A. Aggregate Plant Operations:
1,000,000 tons of processed aggregate material total for all aggregate operations and
equipment approved under this AO, per rolling 12-month period
B. Asphalt Plant Operations:
800,000 tons of combined asphalt production (virgin and recycled asphalt product)
per rolling 12-month period. (480,000 tons of asphalt can be produced with on
specification used oil or #1, #2,. or any combination of#l or #2 fuel oil with the
remaining asphalt produced with natural gas).
C. Concrete Plant Operations:
340,000 cubic yards ofconcrete production per rolling 12-month total
D. Diesel Generator Usage:
The maximum hours of operation per rolling 12-month period for each diesel
generator shall be limited to 1,667.
[R307-401-8]
Page 36 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
j_
I
i
\
DAQE-AN105690012-19
Page5
II.B.1.a.1
II.B.1.b
II.B.1.b.1
II.B.2
II.B.2.a
II.B.2.b
II.B.2.b.1
To determine compliance with a rolling 12-month total the owner/operator shall calculate a
new 12-month total by the 20th day of each month using data from the previous 12 months.
Records of production shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in operation. Production
shall be determined by scale house records or vendor receipts. The records of production shall
be kept on a daily basis. Hours of operation shall be determined by supervisor monitoring and 1
maintaining of an operations log. [R.307-401..:8]
Visible emissions from the following emission points shall not exceed the following values:
A. All crushers -12% opacity
B. All screens -7% opacity
C All baghouse/bin vent exhaust points -10% opacity
D. All conveyor transfer points -7% opacity
E. . All conveyor drop points -20% opacity
F. All diesel engines~ 20% opacity
G. All concrete batch plants -7% opacity
H. All other points -20% opacity
[R307-312, R307-401-8]
Opacity observations of emissions from stationary sources shall be conducted according to 40
CFR 60_, Appendix A, Method 9.
For sources that are subject to NSPS, opacity shall be determined by conducting observations
in accordance with 40 CFR 60.1 l{b) and 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9.
[R.307-305-3]
The Asphalt Plant on site shall he subject to the following:
The asphalt plant baghouse shall control process streams from the asphalt plant drum
mixer/dryer. This baghouse shall be sized to handle at least 109,000 ACFM for the existing
conditions. All exhaust air from the. asphalt plant drum mixer/dryer shall be routed through
the baghouse before being vented to the atm(?sphere. [R307-401-8]
The following operating parameters shall be maintained within the indicated ranges for the
asphalt plant baghouse:
A. The pressure drop shall not be less than 1.5 inches of water column or more than
6.0 inches of water column.
B. The asphalt mix temperature shall not exceed 375 °F.
[R307-401-8]
They shall be monitored with equipment located such that an inspector/operator can safely
read the output any time. The readings shall be accurate to within the following ranges:
A. Pressure drop -Plus or minus 1.0 inches of water column
Page 37 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
DAQE-ANl 05690012,.19
Page6
II.B.2.c
II.B.2.c.1
II.B.2.c.2
B. Asphalt mix temperature-Plus or minus 10 °F
All instruments shall be calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions at least once
every 12 months.
[R307-401-8]
Emissions to the atmosphere from the Asphalt Plant Baghouse Exhaust Stack shall not exceed
the following rates and concentrations:
Pollutant lb/hr grain/dscf
(68 °F, 29.92 in Hg)
PM10 (virgin) ·
PM10 (RAP)
5.52
6.44
0.024
0.028
[R307-401-8]
Stack testing to show compliance with the emission limitations stated in the above condition
shall be pe1formed as specified below:
Emission Point: Drum Exhaust Passing through Baghouse
Pollutant
TSP
Testing Status
*
Test Frequency
#
(virgin & RAP)
PM10 ** @
(virgin & RAP)
*
**
#
@
Initial compliance testing is required for the asphalt plant. The initial test date shall be
perf01med as soon as possible and in no case later than 180 days after the start-up of a
new emission source, an existing source without an AO, or the granting of an AO to
an existing emission source that is modified. A compliance test is required on the
modified emission point that has an emission rate limit. Compliance testing shall not
be required for both virgin and recycled materials during the same testing period.
Testing shall be performed for the product being produced during the time of testing.
Initial test is not required unless directed otherwise by the Director.
Initial test is required. Subsequent tests shall only be performed for PM10 ,
Test every three (3) years or sooner if directed by the Director. Tests may be required
if the source is suspected to be in violation with other conditions of this AO.
Compliance testing shall not be required for both virgin and recycled materials during .
the same testing period. Testing shall be performed for the product being produced
during the time of testing.
[R307-165]
Notification
The Director shall be notified at least 30 days prior to conducting any required emission
testing. A source test protocol shall be submitted to DAQ when the testing notification is
submitted to the Director.
Page 38 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
DAQE~AN105690012-19
Page7
II.B.2.c.3
II.B.2.c.4
The source test protocol shall be approved by the Director prior to performing the test. The
source test protocol shall outline the proposed test methodologies, and stack to be tested,
procedures to be used. A pretest conference shall be held, if directed by the Director.
[R307-l65]
Sample Location
The emission point shall be designed to conform to the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix
A, Method 1, or other methods as approved by the Director. An Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA)-or Min<:i Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)-approved
access shall be provided :to the test location.
[R307-401]
Volumetric Flow Rate
40 CFR 60,. Appendix A, Method 2 or other testing methods approved by the Director
[R307-401]
II.B.2.c.5 PM10
II.B.2.c.6
II.B.2.c.7
For stacks in which no liquid drops are present, the following methods shall be used: 40 CFR
51, Appendix M, Methods 201, 201a, or other testing methods approved by the Director. The
back half condensibles shall also be tested using the method specified by the Director. All
particulate captured shall be considered PM10 •
For stacks in which liquid drops are present, methods to eliminate the liquid drops should be
explored. If no reasonable method to eliminate the drops exists, then the following methods
shall be used: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 5, Sa, Sd, or Se as appropriate, or other testing
methods approved by the Director. The back halfcondensibles shall also be tested using the
method specified by the Director. The portion of the front halfof the catch considered PM10
shall be based on information in Appendix B of the fifth edition of the EPA document, AP-42,
or other data acceptable to the Director.
The back half condensibles shall not be used for compliance demonstration but shall be used
for inventory purposes.
[R307-401]
Calculations
To determine mass emission rates (lb/hr, etc.) the pollutant concentration as determined by the
appropriate methods above shall be multiplied by the volumetric flow rate and any necessary
conversion factors determined by the Director, to give the results in the specified units of the
emission limitation.
[R307-401]
New Source Operation
For a new source/emission point, the production rate during all compliance testing shall be no
less than 90% of the production rate listed in this AO. If the maximum AO allowable
production rate has not been achieved at the time of the test, the following procedure shall be
followed:
Page 39 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
DAQE-AN105690012-19
Page8
II.B.2.c.8
II.B.2.d
II.B.3
II.B.3.a
II.B.3.a.l
1)
2)
Testing shall be at no less than 90% of the production rate achieved to date.
If the test is passed, the new maximum allowable production rate shall be 110% of the
tested achieved rate, but not more than the maximum allowable production rate. This
new allowable maximum production rate shall remain in effect until successfully
tested at a higher rate
3) The owner/operator shall request a higher production rate when necessary. Testing at
no less than 90% of the higher rate shall be conducted. A new maximum production
rate (110% of the new rate) will then be allowed if the test is successful. This process
may be repeated until the maximum AO production rate is achieved.
[R307-401]
Existing Source Operation
For an existing source/emission point, the production rate during all compliance testing shall
be no less than 90% of the maximum production achieved in the previous three (3) years.
[R307-401]
The amount of recycled asphalt used in the asphalt production shall not exceed 40% of the
total product at any time. Compliance shall be determined by the hourly amount of recycled
product introduced to the plant divided by the actual hourly production of the plant. Daily
records maintained on site shall include:
A. · Total production
B. Amount of recycled asphalt used in the total production
C. Daily calculations of the percent recycled used in the total production
[R307-401-8]
All Haul Roads and Fugitive Dust Sources on site shall be subject to the following:
All unpaved roads and other unpaved operational areas that are used by mobile equipment
shall be water sprayed and/or chemically treated to control fugitive dust. The application of
water or chemical treatment shall be used. Treatment shall be of sufficient frequency and
quantity to maintain the surface material in a damp/moist condition or unless it is below
freezing. The opacity shall not exceed 20% on site and 10% at the property boundary during
all times the areas are in use. If chemical treatment is to be used, the plan must be approved
by the Director. [R307-309, R307-401-8]
Records of water and/or chemical treatment shall be kept for all periods when the plant is in
operation .. The records shall include the following items:
A. Date
B. Number of treatments made, dilution ratio, and quantity
C. Rainfall received, if any, and approximate amount
D. Time of day treatments were made
[R307-401_;8]
Page 40 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
1-
1
I
i
I
t-
i
I
I
I
I
I
DAQE-ANl 05690012-19
Page9
II.B.3.b
Il.B.3.b.1
II.B.3.c
II.B.3.d
Il.B.3.e
II.B.3.f
II.BA.a
II.B.4.b
II.B.4.c
II.BA.cl
II.B.4.d.1
II.B.4.e
Visible fugitive dust emissions from haul-road traffic and mobile equipment in operational
areas shall not .exceed 20% opacity on site and 10% opacity at the property boundary.
[R307-309-5]
Visible emissions determinations for traffic sources shall use procedures similar to Method 9.
The normal requirement for observations to be made at 15-second intervals over a six ( 6)-
minute period, however, shall not apply. Six (6) points, distributed along the length of the
haul road or in the operational area, shall be-chosen by the Director or the Director's
representative. An opacity reading shall be made at each point when a vehicle passes the
selected points. Opacity readings shall be made not less than 1/2 the vehicle length behind the
vehicle and not less than 1/2 the height of the vehicle. The accumulated six ( 6) readings shall
be averaged for the compliance value. [R307-309-5]
The haul road limitations shall be:
A. 0. 7 miles in length
B. 0,009 miles in length paved
C. 10 miles per hour
The haul road speed shall be posted, at a minimum,. on site at the beginning of the haul road so
that it, is clearly visible from the haul road. [R307-401-8J
The storage piles shall be watered to minimize generation of fugitive dusts, as dry conditions
warrant or as determined necessary by the Director. [R307-401-8]
The owner/operator shall comply with a FDCP acceptable to the Director for control of all
dust sources associated with the Pit #10 location. The owner/operator shall comply with the
most current FDCP approved by the ,Director. [R307-309-6]
The owner/operator shall comply with all applicable requirements.ofR307-309 for PM10 and
PM2.s NAA for fugitive emission and fugitive dust sources. [R307-309]
AU Fuels Consumed on site shall be subject to the following:
The owner/operator shall use natural gas, fuel oil, or on-specification used oil as defined in
R315-15, in the asphalt plant burner. [R307-401-8]
The owner/operator shall use only natural gas as a primary fuel in the boiler. [R307-4Q1..;8]
The owner/operator shall use only diesel fuel (e.g. fuel oil #1, #2, or diesel fuel oil additives)
in all other on-site equipment. [R307-401-8]
The sulfur content of any fuel oil, except# 1 and #2 diesel fuel, or on-specification used oil
burned in the asphalt plant burner shall not exceed 0.50% by weight. [R307-401-8]
"The sulfur content shall be determined by ASTM Method D-4294-89 or approved equivalent.
Certification of sulfur content shall be either by the owner/operator's-own testing or by test
reports from the fuel marketer. [R307-203-1]
The owner/operator shall combust only diesel fuel that meets the definition of ultra-low sulfur
diesel (ULSD), which has a sulfur content of 15 ppm or less. [R307-401-8]
Page 41 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
DAQE-AN105690012-19
Page 10
II.B.4.e.l To demonstrate compliance with the ULSD fuel requirement, the owner/operator shall
maintain records of diesel fuel purchase invoices or obtain certification of sulfur content from
the diesel fuel supplier. The diesel fuel purchase invoices shall indicate the diesel fuel meets
the ULSD requirements. [R307-401-8]
Section ill: APPLICABLE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
In addition to the requirements of this AO, all applicable provisions of the following federal programs
have been found to apply to this installation. This AO in no way releases the owner or operator from any
liability for compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations including UAC
R307. .
NSPS (Part 60), A: General Provisions
NSPS (Part 60), I: Standards of Performance for Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities
NSPS (Part 60), 000: Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants
MACT (Part 63), A: General Provisions
MACT (Part 63), ZZZZ: NESHAP for Stationary Reciproc~ting Internal Combustion Engines
Title V (Part, 70) Area Source
PERMIT IDSTORY
This AO is based on the following documents:
Supersedes
Is Derived From
Incorporates
AO DAQE-AN0105690009-10 dated June 8, 2010
NOI dated October 12, 2018
Additional Infonnation dated November 7, 2018
ADMINISTRATIVE CODING
The following information is for UDAQ internal classification use only:
Salt Lake County
CDS SM
MACT (Part 63}, Nonattainment or Maintenance Area, Title V (Part 70) Area Source, NSPS (Part 60)
Page 42 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
DAQE-ANl 05690012-19
Page 11
ACRONYMS
The following lists commonly used acronyms and associated translations as they apply to this document:
40CFR
AO
BACT
CAA
CAAA
CDS
CEM
CEMS
CFR
CMS co
CO2
C02e
COM
DAQ/UDAQ
DAQE
EPA
FDCP
GHG
GWP
HAPorHAPs
ITA
LB/HR
MACT
MMBTU.
NAA
NMQS
NESHAP
NOI
NOx
NSPS
NSR
PM10
PM2,5
PSD
PTE
R307
R307-401
S02
TitleN
Title V
TPY
UAC
voe
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Approval Order
Best Available Control.Technology
Clean Air Act
Clean Air Act Amendments
Classification Data System (used by BP A to classify sources by size/type)
Continuous emissions monitor
Continuous emissions monitoring system
Code of Federal Regulations
Continuous monitoring system
Carbon monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Dioxide Equivalent -40 CFR Part 98, Subpart A, Table°A-1
Continuous opacity monitor ·
Division of Air. Quality
This is a document tracking code for internal UDAQ use
Environmental Protection Agency
Fugitive dust control plan
Greenhouse Gas( es) -40 CPR 52.21 (b)( 49)(i)
Global Warming Potential -40 CFR Part 86.1818-12(a)
Hazardous .air pollutant(s)
Intent to Approve
Pounds per hour
Maximum Achievable Control Technology
Million British Thermal Units
Nonattainment Area
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
Notice of Intent
Oxides of nitrogen
New Source.Performance Standard
New Source Review
Particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Potential to Emit
Rules Series 307
Rules Series 307 -Section40l
Sulfur dioxide
Title N of the Clean Air Act
Title V of the Clean Air Act
Tons per year
Utah Administrative Code
Volatile organic compounds
Page 43 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
Kilgore Companies
Appendix "S"
Field Work Safety Plan
2024 PM , PM ,o, PM 2s, and VEOs Compliance Source Test Plan , West Valley Pit #10 , Dillman 500 TPH HMA
Plant, Keams , Utah
Page 44 of 58 GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
SITE SAFETY PLAN BOOKLET
Project: PROJ-041316
Customer: Kilgore Companies LLC
Location: Kearns, Utah
Units: West Valley Pit #10 Dillman 500 TPH Counter-flow HMA Plant
Client Project Manager: Beckie Hawkins
Revision Date: January 21, 2022
Page 45 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
Page 1 of2
Site Safety Plan and JHA Purpose and Instructions
Purpose
Employee safety is the top priority of Montrose Environmental Group. All employees must be
trained to assess and mitigate hazards. The District Manager and Project Manager are
responsible to ensure all hazards have been properly identified and managed. All employees
have Stop Work Authority in all situations where an employee feels they or their co-worker
cannot perform a job safely or if there is a task for which they have not been adequately trained.
The Site Safety Plan (SSP) has been developed to help assist Montrose test crews with
identifying physical and health hazards and determining how the hazards will be managed.
Additionally, the SSP will help each crew manage the safety of the employees by providing
emergency procedures and information. The booklet contains a several safety forms that may
be required in the field.
Instructions
The SSP consists of the following:
1. A Pre-Mobilization Test Plan -To be completed in it's entirety by the client project Manager
prior to the test.
2. A Job Hazard Analysis is a standardized, two-page, fillable form that is used to evaluated the
task/site's particular hazards and controls. The form also includes a daily toolbox topic and
daily hazard review with sign off by the team. The client Project Manager is responsible to
complete the JHA form through section 8. Upon arrival at the test site, the team will review the
form for accuracy, making any corrections required and complete the remainder of the JHA.
Section 9 will require at least three tasks, hazards and controls be identified for the project.
Each team member has the option to discuss making changes or adding to the JHA and must
sign on the Job Hazard Analysis form in agreement and sign in Section 10. The JHA is to be
modified when conditions change. A toolbox meeting with a daily topic in addition to a review of
the hazard analysis is required daily for the duration of the test. An additional sheet of paper
with the toolbox topic and signatures can be added to the SSP packet.
3. Hazard Control Matrix -contains useful information on both engineering and
administrative controls that a crew can use to reduce or eliminate the hazards they have
observed plus applicable PPE that may be required.
4. Emergency Action Plan -The Job Supervisor/ Client Project Manager (CPM) will complete
the Emergency Action Plan form and ensure that all employees are familiar with the facility
emergency and evacuation procedures, assembly/ rally points, alert systems, and signals prior
to work commencing. In the event of an emergency situation/ evacuation, the Job Supervisor/
CPM will maintain a roster and be responsible for accounting for all employees. The Job
Supervisor/ CPM will ensure that this Emergency Action Plan Form is completed,
communicated to all employees, signed, and posted.
5. Additional Forms, as applicable
a. MEWP Lift Inspection Form
b. Heat Stress Prevention Form Based on Heat Index
c. Extended Hours Form
Page 46 of 58
AQS-FRM-1.13R1
GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
Page 2 of2
Site SafetyPlan and JHA Purpose and Instructions
The SSP is a living document. The Project Manager should continually update their SSPs as
new information and conditions change or if new hazards are presented.
Each completed SSP should be maintained with the Test Plan in the office for a period of 3
years. There will be an audit process developed for the Site Safety Plans.
Page 47 of 58 AQS-FRM-1.13R1 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
Page 1 of 2
PRE-MOBILIZATION TEST INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION: WValley Pit #10 HMA PROJECT #: PROJ-041316
TEST DATE: __ J_u_n_e_1~9,~2_0_24 __ _ PROJECT MANAGER: __ A_us_ti_n_T_ra_m_e_ll __
TEST SCOPE: PM/PM10/PM2.5 and VEOs on Dillman 500 TPH Counter-flow HMA
SITE CONT ACT: Name: Bryan Jorgensen Contact Phone: [phone] ----------
Source Type : New Source: Revisit:~ Prj#/Date/Tech: __________ _
Coal Fired Electric Utility: __ Ethanol Plant: Chemical Mfg. of _________ _
Cement/Lime Kiln Plant: Specialty Mfg. of: ____ _ Other: _____ _
Anticipated Effluent Composition -check all that apply and fill in expected concentration in ppm/%
□ □ □ □ □
co NOx voe other
If other, explain: ______________________ _
Flammable: __ _ Toxic: __ _
Engineering Controls to be Implemented:
Additional Safety Equipment Required :
Personal gas monitors: __
Respiratory Protection:
Corrosive: __ _ Dust: ___ _
Half Face__ Full Face__ HEPA Filters __ Supplied Air: __ (Safety Dept. Approval)
Approximate Flue Gas Temperatures, (F)
□ lK)
below210 210 to 450
If other, explain:
Approximate Duct Pressure, (iwg):
□ [x]
below -3 -3 to +3
If other, explain:
□
450to 950
□
+3to+7
Page 48 of 58
□
above 950
□
above +7
□
other
□
other
AQS-FRM-1.17
GP081AS-041316-PP-848
Page 2 of 2
PRE-MOBILIZATION TEST INFORMATION
Sampling Location : Stack Port .1S_
Approximate Sa m pling Platform Heig ht, (ft)
□ IB] □
below6 6to 50 50 to 100
Duct Port
□ □
above 100 other
If other, explain : _______________________ _
A ccess and Prot ection:
Elevators: Ladders : MEWP Lift: Scaffold: Equipment Hoist: __
Guardrails: Toe plate: __ Engineered Tie Off Points: __ Heat Shield:
Other: Existing platforms and handrails
Desc r ibe how equi p men t w ill be mobilized t o the sampling location :
Hoisted by rope or hand-carried
Additional Information:
Effluent Chemical Regulatory Limits
Chemical Cal OSHA PEL 1 Cal OSHA NIOSH REL Cal OSHA
Gas Name Formula (ppm) STEL2
TWA3 (ppm) Ceiling
(oom) (ppm) .
Carbon Monoxide co 25 200 35 200
Nitric Oxide NOx 25 ND5 25 ND
Sulfur Dioxide S02 2 5 2 ND
Hydrogen Chloride HCI 0.3 2 ND 2
Hydrogen Sulfide H2S 10 15 10 (10 min.f 50
California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) based on an 8-hour shift;
2: Cal OSHA Short-term Exposure Limit (STEL) based on a 15-minute period;
IDLH4
(ppm)
1,200
100
100
50
100
3: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Hearth (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) Time-weighted Average (TWA) based
on an 8-hour shift;
4: Immediately Dangerous to Life or Hearth (IDLH);
5: Not Defined (ND);
C: Celfing Umit -Maximum affowable human exposure limit for an airborne or gaseous substance, which Is not to be exceeded, even
momentarily.
Prepared by: Joby Dunmire
Reviewed by: -----------------
Page 49 of 58
Date: May 7th, 20024
Date: ---------
AQS-FRM-1.17
GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
1. Client
Facility
Client Rep
Job Preparation
Job Hazard Analysis
Contact Name
SSPWriter
D Job Site Walk Through Completed D Site Specific Training Complete
0 Safe Work Permit Received from Client
mmlll
lmll
A l l hazards and mitigation steps mL1st be documented.
If tl11s JHA does not cover all the hazards identified,
use Section 9 to document that 111forniation.
If the heat index is expected to be above 91 ", fill out the Heat Stress Prevention Form .
2. Facility Information/Emergency Preparedness
If non-emergency medical attention is needed, call : AXIOM#: 877-502-9466.
Plant Emergency # _________ Certified Fi rst Aid Person :
EMS Location Evacuation Routes Rally Point
Severe Weather Shelter Location Eye Wash & Safety Shower Location
Operational: □Yes □No
Source Information: (list type):
Stack Gas Temp. (°F) Stack Gas Press. ("H20) ___ Stack Gas Components : ____________ _
Dv es D No If yes, see List of Hazard Chemicals. Stack Gas Inhalation Potential?
3. Error Risk
0 Time Pressure
D Lack of procedures
D Monotonous Activity
4. Physical Hazards
Dust Hazards
Thermal Bum
Electrical Hazards
Inadequate Lighting
Slip and Trip
Hand Protection
D Remote Work Location
D Extreme temps, wind >30mph
D First day back after time off
D > 12 hr shift
D Personal illness/fatigue
0 Multiple job locations
D Working > 8 consecutive days
0 Vague work guidance
0 Other:
Hazard Controls
D Dust Mask O Goggles D Other: ------------------□ Hot Gloves O Heat Shields O Other Protective Clothing:
D Connections Protected from Elements D External GFCI □Other:
D XP Rating Requirement O Intrinsically Safe Requirement ---------
□ Install Temporary Lighting O Headlamps
D Housekeeping D Barricade Area D Other: -----------------□ Cut Resistant Gloves D Pinch Pts. 0 General D Electrical D Impact Resistant
0 Other:
Potential Hazards for Consideration
Secondary Permits D Hot Work D Confined Space D Excavation
W?rking from Heights O Falling objects D Fall protection D Drop zone protection D Platform load ratings
See also Sect. 7 D Scaffold inspection D Ladder inspection D Barricades for equipment
Electrical D Exposed wire/connector D Verify equipment grounding D Arc Flash
Lifting O Crane lift plan D Rigging inspection D Tag lines used D Hoists in place
Respiratory D Unexpected exposure O Chemical D Dust (combustible) D PEL provided
See also Sect. 8 D Cartridaes or supplied air available O Gas detection eauipment
5. Required PPE
D Hi-Vis Vests
0 Hard Hats O Safety Glasses
D Metatarsal Guards
0Nomex/FRC
D Harness/Lanyard*
D Hot Gloves
0 OtherPPE :
D Safety Toe Shoe/Boot D Hearing Protection □Safety Spotter
D Goggles O Personal Monitor Type:
0 Face Shield O Respirator Type:
Page 50 of 58
1 of 3
Job Hazard Analysis
Additional Work Place Hazards
6. Critical Procedures -check all that apply-*indicates additional form must be completed or collected from client
D Heat Stress Prevention* D Confined Space* D MEWP* D Roof Work D Scaffold
D Cold Weather Work D Hazardous Energy Control* D Exposure Monitoring D Other: ----------
7. Working From Heights
Fall Protection \ D Fixed Guardrails/Toe boards D Fall Prevention PPE Warning Line System
8.
9.
Falling Objects Protection
Fall Hazard Communication
· \ D Barricading D Netting D House Keeping D Tethered Tools D Catch Blanket or Tarp ID Adjacent/Overhead Workers D Contractor Contact D Client Contact
Other Considerations
Environmental Hazards -Weather Forecast
0 Heat/Cold □Lightning □Rain □Snow D Ice □Tornado □Wind Speed
Steps for Mitigation:
Electrical Safety Planning
Plant Hook up: 011ov 0 220/240V 0 480V D Generator D Hard wired into panel
Electrical Classified Area: □Yes D No Trailer Grounded: □Yes □No Plug Type
Electrical Hook Up Responsibility:
List of Hazardous Chemicals Other Chemicals:
D Acetone D Nitric Acid D Hydrogen Peroxide D Compressed Gases
D Hexane D Sulfuric Acid D lsopropyl Alcohol D Flammable Gas
□Toluene D Hydrochloric Acid D Liquid Nitrogen D Non-Flammable Gas
0H2S D Carbon Monoxide
Steps for Mitigation:
Wildlife/Fauna in Area
0 Poison Ivy □Poison Oak Otnsects: □Wildlife:
Personnel w/ known allergies to bees stings or other allergens? □Yes 0No
Observed Hazards and Mitigation Steps
Task Potential Hazard(s) Steps for Mitigation
• 1 1
2 2
3 3
• 1 1
2 2
3 3
• 1
2 2
3 3
• 1 1
2 2
3 3
2 of3
Page 51 of 58 GPos1As-041316-=~:-s4§'" • • • -
fA. •·· . .,-,~<\ N} () N. i H.() )) L
.. •!\'',: \ ,.,:.:•,t·
Job Hazard Analysis
10 , JHA REVIEW: Crew Names & Signatures
Printed Name
11 Daily JHA Meeting & Review
Items to review:
• Change in conditions
• New workers or contractors
Signature Date Printed Name
• Extended work hours • Daily Safety Topic
• Occurrence of near misses or injuries
Signature Date
Initialing demonstrates that site conditions and hazards have not changed from the original SSP. If changes did occur, make the
necessary updates to this JHA and add notes as applicable in Section 9.
Day Discussion Topic Initials
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Page 52 of .58
3 of3
iv\ t J ,;,,,. 1 k.l.J) t
Page l o/2
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FORM
The Job Supervisor/ Client Project Manager (CPM) will ensure that all employees are familiar with the facility emergency and evacuation
procedures, assembly/ rally points, alert systems, and signals prior to work commencing. In the event of an emergency situation/
evacuation, the Job Supervisor/ CPM will maintain a roster and be responsible for accounting for all employees. The Job Supervisor/
CPM will ensure that this Emergency Action Plan Form Is completed, communicated to all employees, and posted.
•Mou must follow the client's emergency action plan first, and notify your Supervisor immediately.
•If incident is life threatening, CALL 911 IMMEDIATELL Y
•UI non-emergency medical attention i s needed, call AXIOM Medical number: 877-502-9466.
1 MEG Job Supervisor/ CPM 's Name:
2 MEG Job Supervisor/ CPM's Telephone Number:
3 MEG Job Safety Supervisor (if applicable):
4 MEG Job Safety Supervisor's Telephone Number:
5 Plant's Emergency Telephone Number:
6 Local Hospital/ Clinic Telephone Number:
7 Emergency Ops Radio Channel:
8 Plant's #1 Contact Person's Name:
9 Plant's #1 Contact Person's Telephone Number:
10 Plant's #2 Contact Person's Name:
11 Plant's #2 Contact Person's Telephone Number:
12 Designated Assembly Point Location:
13 Evacuation Routes:
14 Severe Weather Shelter Location:
15 Eye Wash and Safety Shower Location:
16 The First Aid Kit is Located: .
17 The Fire Extinguisher is Located:
Page 53 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848
Page2of2
EMERGENCY EVACUATION AND ASSEMBLY MAP
1 Facility Name:
2 Facility Alarm (Circle): YES or NO
FIRE: :
CHEMICAL/ GAS: :
Alarm Tones: SHELTER-IN-PLACE:
EVACUATE: :
3 OTHER: .
4 Designated Shelter(s) Description:
5 Designated Assembly Point(s) Description:
N
W~E
s
Draw the evacuation and assembllf:maf;! here
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FORM AND EVACUATION ASSEMBLY MAP REVIEW: Crew Names and Signatures
Printed Name: Signature: -Date: Printed Name: Signature: Date:
Page 54 of 58 GP0SlAS-041316-PP-848
Page 1 of 1
Daily MEWP Lift Inspection Form
All checks must be completed prior to each work shift, before operation of the MEWP lift. This checklist must be used
atthe beginning of each shift or following 6 to 8 hours of use.
MEWP Lift Model #: Serial Number:
Make: Rented or Owned:
• Check "Yes" if an item is adequate, operational, and safe.
• Check "No" to indicate that a repair or other corrective action is required prior to use.
• Check "N/A" to indicate "Not Applicable."
Items to be Inspected
1. All MEWP lift components are in working condition (i.e. no loose or missing parts, torn or
loose hoses, etc.)-if something can be easily loosened by hand then it is not sufficient.
2. Hydraulic fluid level is sufficient, with the platform fully lowered
3. Hydraulic system pressure (see manufacturer specs) is acceptable.
If the pressure is low, determine cause and repair in accordance with accepted procedures
as outlined in service manual.
4. Tires and wheel lug nuts (for tightness)
5. Hoses and cables (i.e. worn areas or chafing)
6. Platform rails and safety gate (no damage present)
7. Pivot pins secure
8. Welds are not cracked and structural members are not bent or broken
9. Warning and instructional labels are legible and secure, and load capacity is clearly marked.
10. Manufacturer's Instruction Manual is present inside the bucket
11. Base controls (switches and push buttons) can be properly operated
12. Platform conditions are safe (i.e. not slippery)
13. Fire extinguisher is present, mounted and fully charged, located inside the bucket
14. Headlights, safety strobe light and back-up alarm are functional
15. Workplace is free of hazards (overhead powerlines, obstructions, level surface, high winds,
etc.) *Do not operate if winds are 20 mph, unless otherwise specified by manufacturer
recommendations.
Operator Name & Signature Location
Ground Control Name & Signature Location
Harness Inspections:
Printed Name Signature
Printed Name Signature
Printed Name
Yes No N/A
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
□ □ □
[j □ □
□ □ □
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date Signature
Page 55 of 58 GPos1As!bTr:fii~1>~-a~s
MVl i KU.:'>.t.
\ I H Ii l I/. j I I '1 .,, I H '• ; (. 1 "-Page 1 of 1
Extended Hours Safety Audit
Project Number: ----------Date: ------Time:---------
When a project is expected to extend past a 14-hour work day, this form must be completed to evaluate
the condition of the crew, and the safety of the work environment.
Permission to proceed into extended work hours must come from a District Manager (0~) or Regional Vice
President (RVP). Technical RVPs can authorize moving forward, if they are in the field or if they are
managing the project.
1. Hold test crew meeting Test crew initials:
The test leader should look for signs of the following in their crews:
• Irritability • -Fatigue
• Lack of motivation • Depression
• Headaches • Reduced alertness, lack of concentration and
• Giddiness memory
The test leader should assess the environmental and hazardous concerns:
• · Temperature and weather
• Lighting
• Working from Heights
2. Notify DM or RVP
• Hoisting
• PPE (i.e. respirators, etc.)
• Pollutant concentration in ambient air (SO2,
H2S, ect.)
The PM must contact either the DM or RVP to discuss the safety issues that may arise due to the
extended work period. During this time, they can come to an agreement on how to proceed. Items
to discuss include:
• Reason for extended hours
• Reason for delay
• Production limitations
• Impending Weather
3. Contact the client .
The PM, DM or RVP must discuss with client any identified safety concerns, the client's needs and
mutually agree on how to proceed. Discussion should also include the appropriate rest period
needed before the next day's work shift can begin. The DM and/or a RVP must be informed on the
final decision.
Final Outcome:
Approver:
Page 56 of 58
001 AS-SAFETY-FM-3
GP0BlAS-041316-PP-848
Page 1 of 1
Heat Stress Prevention Form
T his form is to be used when the Expected Heat Index is above 91° F, and is to be kept with project
documentation.
er PM:
Ex ected Heat Index:
1. Review the signs of Heat Exhaustion and Heat Stroke
2. If Heat Index is above 91 ° F:
• Provide cold water and/or sports drinks to all field staff (avoid caffeinated drinks and energy
drinks which can increase core temperature).
o Bring no less than one gallon of water per employee
• If employee(s) are dehydrated, on blood pressure medication or not acclimated to heat,
ensure they are aware of the heightened risk for heat illness
• Provide cool head bands/vests/etc.
• Have ice available to employees
• Implement work shift rotations and breaks, particularly for employees working in direct
sunlight.
• Provide as much shade at the jobsite as possible, including tarps, tents or other acceptable
temporary structures.
• PM should interview each field staff periodically to evaluate for signs of heat illness
3. If Heat Index is above 103° F:
• Employees must stop for drinks and breaks every hour (about 4 cups/hour)
• Employees are not permitted to work alone for more than one hour at a time without a
break offering shade and drinks
• Employees should wear cool bands and vests if working outside more than one hour at a
time
• PM should interview each field staff every 2 hours to evaluate for signs of heat illness
Faint or dizzy
Excessive sweating----
Cool, pale, ---~
1
• dammy skin
.--
HEAT
R STROKE,
-~ ..Al
----Throbbing headache
-----Nosweatfng
_ Body temperature l lijc1 . t
above103" ~
Red, hot, dry skin
Nausea or vomiting
Muscle cramps --------May lose Q
consciousness
nn ◄ AC:, CA CCTV caA C
Page 57 of 58 GPOSlAS-041316-PP-848
This is the Last Page of This Document
If you have any questions, please contact one of the following
individuals by email or phone.
Name: Beckie Hawkins
Title: District Manager
Region: Great Plains Region, Utah Office
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Name: Austin Tramell
Title: Field Project Manager
Region: Great Plains Region, Utah Office
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
K ilgore Compan ies
2024 PM , PM,o, PM2 s, and VEOs Compliance Source T est Plan , West Valley P it #10 , Di ll man 5 00 T PH HMA
. Plant, Kearn s , Utah
Page 58 of 58 GP081AS-041316-PP-848