DAQ-2024-008005

1

DAQC-454-24
Site ID 10123 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – HOLLY FRONTIER WOODS CROSS REFINERY, LLC

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: May 13, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Heater 24H1
Contact: Travis Smith – 801-299-6625
Location: 1070 West 500 South, West Bountiful, UT 84087
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
FRS ID #: UT0000004901100013
Permit/AO#: Approval Order AN101230057-23 dated November 15, 2023
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated May 7, 2024

On May 7, 2024, DAQ received a test report for the Holly Frontier Woods Cross Refinery LLC, in Davis
County, UT. Testing was performed on April 2, 2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits
found in Approval Order condition II.B.6.d. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test Method Pollutant DAQ Result Tester Result Limit

24H1 4/2/2024 25A VOC 0.00004* 0.00011* 0.0054*

*lbs./MMBtu

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted in the test report.

CONCLUSION: Heater 24H1 emissions were within limits at the time of the
inspection. No test deviations were noted.

RECOMMENDATION: Heater 24H1 emissions were within Approval Order emission
limits. No further action required.

HPV: N/A

ATTACHMENTS: Stack Test report dated May 7, 2024, and UDAQ Spreadsheets

6 , 3
,.tttFfinctor
May 7,2024 UTAH DEPARruENT OF
EWIRONMENTAL OUAUTY
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Division of Air Quality
Utah Dept. of Environmental Quality Di\,,iSiON OF AIR qUALIT\"
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 841l6
RE: VOC Perform&nce Test Report -24IJ1Crude Unit Furnace
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC, Davis County
Dear Mr. Bird:
ln accordance with Conditions II.B.l.a and II.B.6.d of Approval Order ANI01230057-23, please find
enclosed the results of our recent VOC emissions testing for process heater 24H1. The testing was
conducted Apit2,2024. T'he test results were 0.00011 lbs/IdMBtu for VOC.
Enclosed, please find a copy of the testing report for process heater 24H1.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (801 ) 299-6625 or email at
ft ravis. [e-mail].
I certifu that:
Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and./or conditions specified in the
applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation;
During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained process conditions
representative ofnormal operations, and operated under such other relevant conditions specified by the
Director;
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information
contained in the report are true, accurate, and complete.
Sincerely,
MAY _ 1 2C24
*anA delirerqL
Hand Delivered
D.' \ (-.-,^. S' \^-^-,-(o-( )t
Dustin Simmonds
Vice President and Refinery Manager
HF SinclairWoods Cross Refining LLC
1070 W. 500 S, West Bountiful, UT 84087
801-299-6600 | HFSinclair.com
Enclosure
c: E. Benson (r)Fi[e2.4.4
K. Arnold
J. Barton
M. Jessop
Allare
Source Test Report
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, fI-Ci _rrl/rsrol]:TA':..:li!T'
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful. UT 84087
Source Tested: Heater 24Hl
Test Date: April 2,2024
Project No. AST-2 024-1539-004
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
pdltfu
TECHNICAL GROUP SourceTcsRcport
Test Progmm Swrmary
Regu latory Inform rtion
Permit No.
Source Informrtion
DAQE-AN10t230057-23
I Source Name
Refinery Gas Fired Prooess Heater
Contact Informetion
Sowce ID
Heater 24Hl
Target Parameter
voc
Test Location
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful, UT 84087
Facility Contacts
Eric Benson
eric. benson@hfsinclair. com
(80t)299'-6623
F. Travis Smith
ftrav is. smith@Msinclair. com
(80t)299-6625
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
ProjectManago
Ctrades Horton
[e-mail]
(352\6r.3-75ffi
Field Team Leader
Tobias Hubbard
tobias. [e-mail]
(505) 645-E562
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. shonk@allianc€tg.com
(812) 4s2-4785
Report Coordinator' Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]
Report Reviewer
Sarah Perry
[e-mail]
HF Sinclair - West Bountitul, LrT
l
i
AST-2024-1539-004
2of 43
Page i
puIATEE)
iE.Cllll.l lCAl cl it c i_.1 t,
Source Test Repon
Cerfirtcafion Statement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer ofthis document.
4t30t2024
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 539-004
3 of43
Page ii
pillhrpe
TiCil NICAI GIIOUT-'Source Test Repofi
Table of Coneus
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions................. ........................... l-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ......... l-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ..... 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 34 - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ............. 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content.......... ................. 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A -Volatile Organic Compounds... ........................ 3-l
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,{.......................................... 3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A........................................ 3-3
LIST OF TABLES
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, IITAST-2024- I 539-004
4of43
Page iii
5 of43
plll6rpe
TraiilNiCAI (;i-loutl Source Test Repon
I ntroduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC (HF Sinclair)
to conduct compliance testing at the Woods Cross Refinery in West Bountiful, Utah. Portions of the facility are
subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit
No. DAQE-AN101230057-23. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of volatile organic compounds
(VOC) at the exhaust of Heater 24H1.
1.1 Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-l: Project Team
1.3 Site Specilic Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by HF Sinclar.
IIF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT
Unit ID Process Descriotion Air Pollution Controls
24Hl Crude Unit No. 2 Furnace, 32.5 MMBtU/hr process
furnace, fired on plant gas, natural draft, 4 burners, and
up-fi red furnace. Stack temperature approximately
460'F.
Ultra-low NOx bumers
HF Sinclair Personnel F. Travis Smith
Alliance Personnel
Tobias Hubbard
Supilani Mailei
Cael Krahn
AST-2024- I 539-004
6 of43
Page l-l
7 of43
pilt6rpe
TECHNICAL GIlOUP Source Test Report
Sumnary of Results
2.0 Summery of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Woods Cross Refinery in West Bountiful, UT on April 2, 2024.
Testing consisted of determining the emission rate of volatile organic compounds (VOC) at the exhaust of Heater
24H1.
Table 2-l provides a surnmary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ limits. Any
difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices
is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-l: Summary of Results
0.17
0.064
0.0078
0.00022
0.087
0.033
0.0040
0.0001I
0.0054
2
olatile Organic Compounds* Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Concentration, ppmvd @l5o/o Oz
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Factor, lb/\4MBtu
Permit Limit, lb/MMBtu
Percent of Limit, 7o
0.051
0.0r9
0.0024
0.000065
0.039
0.015
0.0018
0.000050
I Measured as total hydrocarbons (as propane)
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, LrTAST-2024-1539-004
8 of43
Page 2-l
9 of43
pill6rpe
TFCIlNICAI ciflcr_lP Source Test Report
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 1 and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Yolumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.5.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on
the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A -Volatile Organic Compounds
The volatile organic compounds (VOC) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
25A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful. UT
Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide
Volatile Organic Compounds
AST-2024- I 539-004
l0 of43
Page 3-l
Source Test Repot
Testing Methodologt
probe, heated Teflon sample line(s) and the identified gas analyzer. The quality control measLlres are described in
Section 3.6.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2o/o) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5Vo
absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5o/o (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5%o (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-Level gas
was zero gas, the response was 0.5%o or 5.0 percent ofthe upscale gas concentration (whichever was less restrictive).
The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The measurement
system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was within 5.0
percent ofthe Calibration Span or 0.5o/o absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and System
Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5o/o absolute
difference. Ifthe drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5o/o, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each
traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time.
If the diluent concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.3o/o (whichever was less
restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test runs. If
the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 0.5Yo from the
average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7, 50.0
and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the
stack wall). Ifthe pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 0.5o/o from the average concentration,
then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful. UTAST-2024- I 539-004
I I of43
Page 3-2
pill6rpe
IEOI.I NIC/\i CRCUP Source Test Report
Testing Methodologt
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol I (+l- 2o/o) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Within two (2) hours prior to testing, zero gas was introduced through the sampling system to the analyzer. After
adjusting the analyzer to the Zero gas concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value
was recorded. This process was repeated for the High-Level gas, and the time required for the analyzer reading to
reach 95 percent of the gas concentration was recorded to determine the response time. Next, Low and Mid-Level
gases were introduced through the sampling system to the analyzer, and the response was recorded when it was
stable. All values were less than +/- 5 percent of the calibration gas concentrations.
Mid-Level gas was introduced through the sampling system. After the analyzer response was stable, the value was
recorded. Next, Zero gas was introduced through the sampling system, and the analyzer value recorded once it
reached a stable response. The Analyzer Drift was less than +/- 3 percent ofthe span value.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 539-004
l2 of43
Page 3-3
13 of43
dAliatrcG)
T t c il |.1 ,c B,L r] fiil Li F}
Example Calculations
L*"tiuu
Soilrce Hert r r4Hl
Pruj6t No.
Run No.
Paramte r(s)
Meter Pr6surc (Pm), io. Hg
AH
. Pm = Pb+IJz
whera.
Pb 25.56 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
Ag-6.T3d--= prozure differentialof orifice, in H2O
Pm 25.62 = in. Hg
Absoluac St.ckG.s Prcssure (Ps), in. Hg
PsPs = Pb+=i. lJ.bwmre!
Pb__ 2:!11_= barometric pr6sure, in. Hg
Pg -0.26 = sratic pressure, in. H2O
Ps-!!!_=in Hg
Standard Meaer Volure (VNtd), dscf
17.636xVmxPmxY
where,
Y 0.976 = meter correction fetor
V. J l.-6!i- = -eter volume. cf
Pfi 25.62 = absolute meter prosure, in. Hg
Tm 521.8 = abplule meter temperatu.e, oR
Vrutd 26.486 = dscf
Strndrrd Wea Volutr (Vsstd), scf
Vstd=004716xVlc
where,
Mc 101.0 = weight ofHro collected, g
vmtd--G5-=r"f
Moistrre Fraction (BWSsat), dimNionless (theorctic.l .t srtur.tcd cmditions)
- ^- / 2'427 \
10o "'-\Tar333/. BWSsatshera, D-
Ts-?g!:!-= strck temperatue, oF
Ps 24.5 = absolute stack 96 pressue, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 = dimensionlcss
Moisture Frrction (BWS), dimnsionlss
Vwstdsws=A;*,nffi
Vmtd 4.763 = studed ret wlume, scf
Vmtd 26.486 = standard mete. volme, dscf
BWS 0.152 = dimmsionless
Moisture Fnction (BWS), dimruionl.$
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat ( BWSmsd
Bh€rc,
BWSsat 1.000 = mistue fraction (th@retical at saturated conditiotrs)
BWSmd 0.1, = moisture fraction (me6ured)
BWS 0.152
Molc.ul.r Weight (DRY) (Md), lbnb-molc
y6 = (0.aa x o/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/o02) + (0.28(100- 7o CO2 - VoOZ))
wh€rc,
COrL= cebon dioxide @ncmralion,To
O, _jl_ = orygen oncmration, 7o
Md 29.68 = lb/lb ml
Tm
14 of 43
F:
AliatrcEr
7ttllllNl{.AL {ifi{)1";rl
Location Hf Sinclair Woods Cross Relining, LLC - W6t Bouotiful, UT
Sor"a"-
P*j*, ,fo.
Run No. I
Example Calculations
Paramter(s)
Ms
whcre,
Molccular Wcisht (WET) (Ms), lbnb-mlc
= Md (1 - BwS) + 18.01s (BwS)
Md-z!L= moleular weight (DRY), lb4b ml
BWS 0.152 = mistue fraction, dimensionless
ur"..........ffi=ttltu*t
'- (*
Yqa =
wherc,
Aversge Velo.ity (Vs), ftlsec
. Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (Apt/z1avg xwherc.
Cp
-.,]g:]ql-
= pitot tube @efffcient
A P'"-..1![= average prelrrcst test velocity head of stek go, (in H2O)Id
Ts_.,11g!!= average pre/post test abelute stack terpcratue, oR
Ps L= abolute stack go prssure, in. Hg
Ms 27 .91 = molecular wight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
Vs 18.0 = ft/sec
Avcr.8e SaackGrs FloB ,t St.ck Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa=60xVsxAs
wherc,
Vr__]L_= ttack 96 velocity, ff/$c
As I 1.29 = cross-sectional dea ofstack, ft2e^--w!-=uf^
Averrge Saa.kGss Flow .t Shndard ConditioN (Qs), dscfm
Qsd= l7636xQax(l.BWS)x
Qa 12,226 : average shck go flow at shck @nditions, acfm
BWS 0.152 = misture fraaion, dimensionless
k 24-12 = absolute stack gs prssure, in. Hg
Ts 664-5 = average pre/post test absolute stack terperatue, oR
qs@=ascfn
Dry Gas Mctcr Calibration Check(Yqa), percent
Ps
Ts
y'Alt avg.
Y 0.976 = meter con*tion factor, dimensionless
@ 60 = m time, min.
V*-|!,1!!= atal mete, volwe, dcf
T.-!{!-= abmlute meter temperature, oR
Al7@ 1.957 = orifice meter @libration coefficimt, in. HrO
Pb 25.56 = barcmetric p.6ue, itr. I{g
AHaug__@_= average prcsure differential of orifice, in H2O
Md
-?2qg-
= rcl*ular weight (DRY)' lb/lb mol
( H)''' L= average square root presue differmtial of orifice, (in. H2O)t'
Yqa -2.4 = percent
15 of43
nllmrpe'r*{":nNIUAL {*t{$iJr
Location: HF Sin.lg
Source: Heater 24Ht
Project No.: AST-2024-1512
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 3,{
Oz - Outlet Concentration (Cs,), % dry
Co,= (Cor,-Co)>< ( ?#Ci
where,Cou, 5.35 = average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co
-0:T-:
average of pretest & posttest zero responses , % dry
CMA-TO.F= actual concentration of calibration gas,o/odry
CM-Tf:Of-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry
Co,T: Oz Concentration,o/o dry
CO, - Outlet Concentration (C6s,), 70 dry
Cco,: (Coo,-Co)- ( Ttr;)
where,Cob, 9.06 :averageanalyzervalueduringtest,%odry
Co
-O.i5-:
average of pretest & posttest zero responses , o/o dry
CMA-TIIT0-= actual concentration of catibration gas,o/o dry
CM
-T0:9T-:
average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, %o dry
Cco,-zT-: Coz Concentration, 7o dry
Example Calculations
l6 of43
I !:: {-": i i },' i a-, ;r\ :- il ,trl i-i'1, |'
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heate.24Ht
Project No.: AST-202 4-1539
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 25A
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (Crnc), ppmvd
Crsc 0.05
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (Crnc*), ppmvw
VTHCw Cs6x(l -BWS)
where,
Cnrc 0.05 = THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
BWS 0.152 : moisture fraction, unitless
crr.*--01-: ppmvw
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (C<THCcl5>), ppmvd @ ls%" O,
^ Crsc*tr"c-ffi
co.*A
BWS 0.152
where,
C<THCcl5>:
where,
Crnc
EFrHco,a:
where,
Crnc
co, 5.25
CcTHCcl5> 0.02
: THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvw
= moisture fraction, unitless: ppmvd
= THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
= oxygen concentration, o^
: ppmvd @l5o/o Oz
CrHc x
0.05
THC - Outlet Emission Rate (as C3H8) (ERry6), lb/hr
Cry6x MW x Qs x 60 T xZ&nhW
where,
crHc 0.05 = THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
MW 44.1 : THC molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 6,744 : stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERrHc 0.002 : lb/hr
THC - Outlet Emission Factor (as C3H8) (EFrsco,a)' lb/'lVIMBtu
ERs6.xKxFdx (-bpq;)
0.05 : THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
K 1.145338-07 = constant, lb/dscf ' ppmvd
Fo.ffi-: fuel factor, dscflMMBtu
Co, 5.25 : oxygen concentration, To
EF,rco,a 0.0001 : lb/\4MBtu
l'l of 43
l8 of43
JJe
AIiarrce
-t
Emissions Calculations
Lootion
Source Heater 24Hl
Project No. AST-2024-l 539
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averaee
Date
Stan Time
Stop Time
412124
l6:38
17:37
412124 4/2124
18:03 19:25
19:02 20:24
Source Data
Fuel Factor (O2 drv). dscf/MMBtu Fd 8,370 8,370 8,370 8,370
Inout Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml-4), dscfm
BWS
Qs
0.1s2
6,744
0.143
6,789
0.138 0.t44
6,648 6,727
Calculated Data - Outlet
Jz Concentration, %o dry co, 5.25 5.22 5.21 5.23
lOz Concentration. 7o dry C.o 9.21 9.19 9.28 9.23
IHC (as CrHa) Concentration, ppmvd
IHC (as C:Ha) Concentration, ppmvw
IHC (as CrHr) Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 o/, O,
IHC (as CrHa) Emission Rate, lb/hr
tHC (as C,H') Emission Factor. [b/lVIMBtu (O2d)
Crnc
C*c*
CrHc",s
ERrnc
EF*..r,
0.051 0.039 0.17 0.087
0.043 0.033 0.15 0.075
0.019 0.015 0.064 0.033
0.0024 0.0018 0.0078 0.0040
0.000065 0.000050 0.00022 0.00011
l9 of43
rrlIffiTEBTE*i-{N:C,AL &&{}Up Method 1 Data
Loc.tion HF SiuchirWmd! Crcr!LLC - Wst Boutrtiful, UT
sorftc llaatcr r{Hl
Pmjftt No. AST-202J-1539
Drre O1n2l2t
DudOrientriion: V{ical
Duct D$ign: Circular
Di(rnce fom Frr W.ll to Outlidc of Poff: 56.00 in
lippte t-engttr: ----i36-in
D"pth of Du"t, --ii3i-in
Cross Sstiotr.l Aftr of nucr, -liE-rt,
No. ofTclt Pons: 2
Nuober of Rerding! per Point: I
Di.t-"e l, ----lii-ft
Dilt.nce A Duct llirmden:----ZS:--1.urt be, O.S1
Didrme B: il.O ft
Distrncc B Duct Dirmetcro: l9J (mu!t be > ,)
Minimum Numbar ofTnrr* Poinls: 12
Acrurl Number of Trrv".." Point., -----l-
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE FOINTS
Nanbq oftaeerv poln6 oi e diemdu
I
2
3
t
5
6
1
t
9
l0
l1
t2
2 7 t 9 to tl t,
14.6
85.{
6.1
25.0
75.0
,1'
t.{
11.6
29.6
10.t
85.{
'1u
3.2
10.5
19.,1
32.3
61.1
80.6
89.5
,:t
2_6
8.2
14.6
22.6
31.2
65.8
11.1
E5.{
91.8
2.1
6.7
I t.8
17.7
25.0
J5.6
il.{
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.1
91.9
.Percent ofiack dia,neterlrm inside vall to iavene pint.
Tnvae '/o ol
Dirmeter
DiSrtrcc Diriancc
frem
outideolrrll
I
3
1
5
6
1
E
9
l0
ll
12
25.0
75.0
93.3
1.05
11.38
3{.1 3o'l'
t3 9n6
2t 7A
{1 5/8
52 t5n6
Sack Diagtu
A=96i.
B=7{ft.
Deprh of Drcr = 45.5 itr
Crcss SectioMl Arca
oisturbanre
Disturbance
20 of43
dAtIatrce
I[:CHN](lAl ('in()lJ'Cyclonic Flow Check
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source Heater 24Hl
Project No. AST-2024-1539
Date 412124
Sample Point Angle (AP=O)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
t3
t4
l5
t6
Averase 3.r
2l of 43
d/wAliarrce'I E {-: H $J : t.l A t* .r; l{ {1-) li f
Field Data
Method 2Data
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining. LLC - West Bountiful. UT
Source Heater 24Hl
Project No. AST-202+1539
I
4t2t24
VALID
15 47
15 54
Pass
)
4t2124
VALID
l8:02
19.02
Pass
3
4t2t24
VALID
l9:03
20:03
Pass
I
I
3
4
5
6
7
8
BI
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.07
o.07
0.04
202
201
203
202
205
208
206
203
204
206
205
208
207
204
207
206
0.0s
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
008
0.07
0.06
0.06
200
206
2ts
203
199
204
205
20s
204
207
210
208
206
205
203
205
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.0s
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.06
U.U)
202
203
20s
20s
204
205
207
206
206
208
209
202
204
208
210
210
Square RootofAP, (in. \{C)tn (AP)"'
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp)
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg)
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Temperature, oF (Ts)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat)
Moisture Fraction (BWS)
02 Concentration, To (O2)
CO2 Concentration, 7o (CO2)
rular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md)
rular Weightr lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, ftlsec (Vs)
VtrR at stack conditions, acfm (Qa)
VFR at standard conditions, sclh (Qsw)
VFR at standard conditions, scfm (Qsw)
0.255
0.07
0.840
24.s4
-0.26
24.s2
204.8
664.s
0.152
1.000
0.152
5.25
9.21
29.68
27.91
18.0
t2,226
477,411
7,957
0.255
0.07
0.840
24.s4
-0.12
24.s3
205.3
665.0
0.143
1 000
0.143
5.22
9. l9
29.68
28.01
18.0
12,183
475,s59
7,926
0.248
0.06
0.840
24.54
-0.12
24.s3
205.9
665.5
0.1 38
1.000
0.t38
5.21
9.28
29.69
28.08
17.5
I I,868
462,886
7,715
0.2s3
0.06
0.840
24.s4
-0. l7
24.53
205.3
665.0
0.145
1.000
0.145
s.23
9.23
29.69
28.00
17.8
12,092
471,952
7,866
22 of43
edwAllalrce
TgCr-lN.l1SAL Gfi0UF
Method 4Data
lfirtior
Soorca
D-i- N^
Parrmclcn(!: VFR
Console Unitt / Mdhod lll M{
lun No.
)rtc
it.[t
;trd Tim€
and Timo
luo Timc, min (0)
tretGr ID
I
q2/24
VALID
16i38
l7:38
60
M5-2600
2
4nD{
VALID
18i02
l9:02
m
3
112t21
VALTD
l9:25
20:25
60
vleter Corclioa tr.ctor (Y)
)riftcc.libr.lionv.lue (AH@)
Itrx Vrcuuil, ln. Hg
o.916
1.951
0mt
o.976
t.951
2
0.fr)o
0.916
t.951
2
0.m
trd.rVolumq E
0
5
l0
l5
20
25
30
35
to
{5
50
55
60
totrl Md.r Voluna ft3
613.812
676.450
679.1m
6tt.760
681.310
686.950
689.600
692.2&
69,1.990
691.550
700.2 l0
702.850
705.510
31.698
105.710
708.r90
1 1.21r)
713.930
716.580
7 19.240
721.990
121.5@
121.230
129.9X
132.510
735.250
737.945
738.N8
741.810
111.570
117.320
750.060
752.890
755.5{O
758.210
16t.O20
163.1W
166.5t0
769.530
172.980
[opdaturc,
0
5
l0
l5
20
30
35
{0
15
y)
55
6{
{vcilge Tmpenturc, oF Cfm)
{verrgaT€mpemtorc,oR (Tn)
uinimuE Te6p€n0rc,oF
Mder
6
67
61
69
69
69
69
69
69
68
68
68
68
68
52E
66
Pmbe Filter lun ,op. cti
65
66
67
61
66
61
6
65
66
61
6
66
6
a
Mdal
68
6E
6E
68
6E
68
68
68
69
69
69
69
58
528
68
69
Prebe Filter
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
z
2
2
2
2
Imp. Exi
65
6
65
65
6
66
6
65
65
65
G5
61
6
;
61
Md€.
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
529
69
69
Pobe Filtcr IEp. Ei
55
65
66
66
67
66
67
6t
67
67
66
6
65
fl
hmmetric Prcssurc, in. Hg
,Ider Orifie Prcsc , lr, WC
fetcr PlBurc, h, Eg
itrtrdrrd Meter Volume. fll
(Pb)
(AE)
(Pn)
(VD$(
25.56
0.850
25.62
25.56
0.850
25 62
25.57
t.m
25.il
[.ly!ir Typc
mpinger I,PrdPo( TBt, I
mplnger 2, Pr.y'Post Tst, g
mpitrgr 3, Prc/Poil T6l, I
mpitrg.r {, P(/Posl Tdt, g
/olume Wrter Collded, EL (vlc)
itudrdwrtervolumgfl (vsrtd)
YIoifrrc Fretion Meffurcd (BWS)
;uMoleul.rWcight,lbilb-mole(drf) (Md)
GDvimric
H20
H20
E*ptl
505.1
417.9
31t.2
539.t
499.6
350.4
58t 7
14.1
2t.1
39.2
J{
H20
H20
Empty
539.8
499.6
350.1
58t ?
583.t
509.7
387.6
589 6
43.3
t0.l
37.2
49
H20
H20
Empty
Silica
J83. I
509.7
387.6
J84.7
621.3
52t.3
426.3
592 4
{1.2
ll.6
38.7
7.7
101.0
4.763
o.152
29.68
t4
95.5
4.50{
0.143
29.68
4.8
99.2
1.614
0.138
29.69
48
23 of 43
auffimeT€*r".il"it*&L G&()rJp
Location: HF Sinclair
Tim
Unit
Strius
5.35
t0.99
0. l6
0.20
0. l8
il.01
I 1.00
I l.0l
9.06
I l.l0
0.05
0.05
0.05
10.90
t0 92
0.04
18.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
17.50
17.88
17.69
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.05
004
0.05
0.04
004
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
10.91
9
5.27
J.3 r
5.40
5.37
5.42
5.35
5.47
5.53
5.38
5.30
5.43
5.34
5.44
5.34
5.30
5.32
5.35
5.48
5.44
5.37
5.28
5.44
5.40
5.43
5.35
5.33
5.35
5.44
5.29
5.29
5.t0
5.48
5.43
5.37
5.36
5.12
5.39
5.36
5.34
5.36
5.38
5.33
5.35
5.35
J.35
5.36
5.44
5.30
5.22
5.28
5.31
5.31
5.28
5.38
5.31
5.29
5.t7
5. l0
9.t2
9. t5
9.07
9.03
9.04
9.00
9.05
8.98
8.98
9.07
9.09
9. l3
9.0t
9.07
9.02
9.07
9.09
9.07
9.01
8.98
9.01
9.05
9. l0
8.99
903
9.01
9.07
9.06
9.06
8.99
9.09
9.09
9.08
8.98
9.02
9.04
9.05
9.08
9.03
9.04
9.07
9.06
9.05
9.09
9.08
9.07
9.08
9.06
9.03
9.09
9. l6
9. l3
9.09
9.08
9. I0
9.05
9.08
9. l0
9.t1
920
Run 1- RM Data
Sou"cc:
Proiect No.: AST-2024-1539
D.a.: 41424
Or - Outlct COr - Outlet THC - Outlet
o/. dt! "/" dry ppmw
Valid Vdid Vdid
Uncorrect d Run Averrge (qb)
C.l Grs Con.cotratim (CMn)
Pretest Sysacm ZEro RcspoN
Pcttest Systcm Zero Relpose
Average Zero RcspoN (Co)
Pretest SyrtcmCd R.spoe
PGitcst System C.I Rcspoe
Avcrrge Cd R6ponsc (CM)
t6:38
l6:39
l6:40
l6:41
16:42
l6:43
l6:44
l6:45
l6:46
l6:47
l6:48
l6:49
l5:50
l6:5 I
l6:52
16r53
16i54
l6:55
l6:56
l6:57
16r58
l6:59
17i00
l710l
l7:02
l7:03
l7:04
l7:05
17l
17:07
l7:08
l7:09
l7: l0
l7:ll
17:12
l7: l3
17,14
11:15
l7: l6
l7:17
l 7:18
l7:19
l7:20
l7:21
l7:22
l7:23
17:24
17:25
17126
17t27
l7:28
17129
l7:30
l7:3 I
l7:32
l7:13
11:34
l7:35
17:36
l7:37
24 of43
anffirrceTEfitlNrfi&L fr&eltlB
Run2-RMData
Lc"aiont
Sourcc: Heater 24Hl
Proje.t No.: AST-2024-1539
Tim
Utrit
Or - Outlct
o/o dry
5.33
10.99
0.20
0.20
0.20
I 1.00
I 1.00
t 1.00
5.22
5.28
5.26
5.22
5.27
5.33
s.23
5.36
5.38
5.39
5.40
5.34
5.35
5.34
5.27
5.24
5.35
5.35
5.30
5.29
5.35
5.27
5.27
5.25
5.27
5.30
5.28
5.29
5.37
5.34
5.37
5.33
5.38
5.34
5.31
5.31
5.31
5.40
5.47
5.39
537
5.12
5.40
5.34
5.35
5.33
5.34
5.32
5.35
5.36
5.42
5.41
5.39
5.30
5.4t
5.36
5.17
5.35
5.25
5.33
9.03 0.03
lt.lo 18.00
0.05 0.04
0.06 0.04
0.06 0.04
10.92 17.88
I 0.88 t1.40
10.90 l'1.64
9.08
9.07
9.08
9.09
9.05
9. l0
9.06
9.03
9.02
9.04
9.01
9.04
9.09
9. l0
9.01
9.04
9.04
9.08
905
9.08
9.09
9.09
9.01
9.06
9.06
9.05
9.02
9.02
9.00
9.02
8.99
9.01
9.04
9.04
8.99
9.00
8.94
8.96
8.99
9.03
8.99
9.02
9.01
9.03
9.05
9.04
899
9.00
8.98
8.99
9.00
9.04
9.06
9.00
9.02
9.02
9.O4
9.06
9.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
003
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.04
COr - Outlet THC - Outleto/"dty ppffi
Valid Velid
Uncorrccted Run Avarrgc (qb)
Crl G.s Concenanti@ (CM^)
Prctest System Zcro Resposc
Posttest System Zcro R.spmsc
Average Zero Respore (Co)
Prctest System Cal RcspoNc
Posttest System Cal RcapoN.
Averag. Cd Repoorc (CM)
Corrccted Run
18r03
l8:04
l8:05
l8:06
l8:07
l8:08
l8:09
l8: l0
l8:ll
l8:12
l8:1 3
l8:14
l8: l5
l8: l6
l8:17
l8: l8
l8: l9
l8:20
l8:21
l8:22
l8:23
18.24
l8:25
18r26
l8:27
18r28
I 8:29
l8:30
l8:3t
18132
l8:33
l8:34
l8:15
l8:16
l8:37
l8:38
l8:39
l8:40
tE:41
I8:42
l8:43
l8:44
l8:45
l8:46
18.47
l8:48
l8:49
t8:50
l8:51
l8:52
l8:51
l8:54
l8:55
l8:56
I 8;57
l8:58
t8:59
l9:00
l9:01
19102
25 of43
aIlmrce
ry r.*?4F{ r *A L S & i:J L,l -3
Run3-RMData
Locetion: HF Sinclair Wods Cross
P"oi""t No.,
Drler 412/24
Uncorrcctld Run Averr8e
Crl Grs Conc.ntratiotr (CMr)
Pretesa Syslcm Zero Rcspoe
Pcftcst System Ze.o Respos
Avcragc Zrro Response (Co)
Pretest SystemCal RespoNc
Posttest Sygaem Cal RclpoNe
Avcrege Cal Response (Cs)
Correctcd Run
Or - Outl.t CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
o/. dtf o/o dry pptw
Valid Valid Vdid
0. l5
18.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
t7.40
t7.66
17.53
5.45
5.51
5.50
5.48
5.45
5.40
5.46
5.47
5.44
5.42
5.33
5.37
5.35
5.29
5.2t
5.24
5.28
5.30
5.31
5.26
5.27
5.24
5.20
5.23
s.25
5.29
5.34
5.27
5.29
5.21
5.26
5.21
5.32
5.31
5.23
5.23
5.25
5.24
5.27
5.26
5.23
5.22
5.20
5.20
5. l9
5.18
5.28
5.30
5.29
5.29
5.34
5.30
5.30
5.32
5.37
5.34
5.40
5.41
5.33
8.99
8.95
8.96
8.9'7
9.00
9.04
8.98
8.99
9.01
9.03
9.09
9.07
9.08
9.u
9. l6
9.t4
9.t2
9. l0
9.09
9.t4
9. l3
9.14
9.t7
9.15
9. l6
9. r3
9.1 I
9. l3
9.13
9. l3
9.14
9. l5
9. l3
9.13
9.19
9. t8
9. l8
9.t1
9. l9
9.t1
9. t8
9. l8
9.18
9. l9
9. l9
9.20
9.20
9. l3
9.t2
9.t2
9. l3
9. r3
9.t2
9. l3
9. l3
9.09
9.l r
9.07
9.08
9.t I
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.M
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.26
4.39
|.76
0.18
0.04
0.04
Tim
Unit
19:25
19:26
19:27
19:28
19:29
l9:30
l9:31
19:32
l9:33
l9:34
l9:35
19i36
l9:37
l9:38
19139
l9:40
l9:41
19:42
19:43
19144
l9:45
19:46
19:47
19r48
l9:49
l9:50
l9:5 I
19152
l9:53
l9:54
l9:55
l9:56
19:57
l9:58
l9:59
20:00
20:01
20:02
20:0)
20tO4
20:05
20:06
20:07
20:08
20:09
20:10
20:tl
20:12
20: t3
20:14
20: l5
20: l6
Z0:17
20: l8
20:19
20:20
20:21
20123
20:24
t0.99
0.20
0. l6
0. t8
I 1.00
I 1.00
t 1.00
I l.l0
0.06
0.06
0.06
t0.88
10.91
10.90
26 of 43
Almrpe\,
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
FUEL FACTOR CALCULATION BASED ON FUEL ANALYSIS
COMPONEN'I MW MOI,EY"MOI,ES C MOLES H MOLES O MOLES N MOLES S
HYDROGEN 2.016 14.6842 69.368
HELIUV 4.003
METHANE 16.043 35. I 803 35.180 140.721
WATEF 18.01 5
CARBON MONOXIDI 28.010
NITROGEI\28.013
ETHYLENT 28.054 4.4894 8.979 r 7.958
ETHANT 30.070 I 0.579 I 21.158 63.475
OXYGEI\31.999
HYDROGEN SULFIDE 34.076
ARGON 39.948
PROPYLENE 42.081
CARBON DIOXDE 44.0t0
PROPANE 44.097 14.7919 44.376 I 18.335
BUTYLENES 56.08 0.t236 0.494 0.989
ISO.BUTANE 58.24 0.1515 0.606 r.5 l5
N-BUTANE 58 24
PENTENES 70.3s
ISO-PENTANE 72.5l
N.PENTANE 1''5l
BENZENE 78.t4
HEXANE 86.78
TOLUENE 92.4l
HEPTANE 100.205
ETHYLBENZENE 106.168
XYLENT 106.168
TOTAI 100.000 I I 0.793 4t2.361
WEIGHT (LBS)l ,330.740 415.618
WEIGHT%76.20t 23.799 0.000 0.000 0.000
LHV (BTUiSCH:1,004 = SUM [ (MOLE%r o LHV,) + IQQ ]
= SUM [ (MOLE%I o HHV,) + 1QQ ]
= SUM [ (MOLE %i o DENSITY ) * 100 ]
= DENSITY (LB/SCF) + DENSITYATn P.0763 LB/SCF)
= HHV = DENSITY
= SUM [ (MOLEYIi o MW i) + 100 ]
= 196 o [ (3.64 o%H) + (1.53 o%C) + (0.1 4 o%N) + (0.57'%S) - (0.46 o%O) ] * GCV
= 196 o [ (5.57 .%H) + (1 .53 .%C) + (0.14 o%N) + (0.57'%S) - (0.46 .%O) ] + GCV
= lo6 . (0.321 o%C) + GCV
=0.209oFa+F.
HHV GTU/SCF)t.1t7.32
DENSITY (LB/SCF)0.046
SPECIFIC GRAVITY:0.603
GCV(BTU/LB)24,278
MW (LB/LBMOLE)17.464
F6 fl)SCF/rvrMBTU):8.370
F*, (WSCF/IVIMBTU):t0,262
F"(SCF/MMBTU):1.008
Expected Foi I 736
27 of43
28 of43
ffiAIiETEeTH.Cilrui0A{- *fiC'}UP
QA Data
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source Heater 24Hl
Project No. AST-2024-l 539
Parameter O, - Outlet CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Oneratins Ranse
SERVOMEX
1400
1240-4
25
SERVOMEX
1440
t4t5c-2
20
THERMO
55i
t209szts0
200
Cylinder ID
Zero
Mid
Hieh
NA
RR0425 I
cc749479
NA
RR0425 I
cc749479
NA
EB007l5 r 5
EB007r5 I 5
Cylinder Certifed Values
7*ro
Mid
Hish
NA
10.99
23.02
NA
ll.l
22.93
NA
30.38
30.38
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
9lt913t
lt6/3r
NA
9fi9t31
Ut6t3t
NA
U24t25
t/24t25
fvpe of Sample Line Heated Line
29 of43
anIffi]Ee
?H(}HN}CAL {:R(lU"
Response Times
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 24Hl
Project No.: AST-2024- I 539
Times, seconds
Parameter 0z - Outlet COr - Outlet THC - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
30
30
Average 30.0 30.0 30.0
30 of43
N?AfAIEe"I'r.c
'.-t
t{ I fiA L fittr{}t] i}Calibration Data
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinine. LLC - West Bountiful. UT
Source: Heater 24Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Date: 4/2/24
Parameter O, - Outlet CO, - 0utlet THC - Outlet
Exoected Averase Concentration
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Span 23.02 22.93 35.00
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.21
13.81
9.17
13.76
15.75
19.25
High Range Gas
Low
Hiph
NA
NA
NA
NA
28.00
3 1.50
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero
Mid
Hish
0.00
10.99
23.02
0.00
I l.l0
22.93
0.00
18.00
30.38
Uoscale Calibration Gas (C-^)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Mid
Hish
0. l5
I 1.20
23.10
0.01
10.85
22.93
0.04
18.08
30.47
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Mid
Hish
0.65
0.91
0.36
0.04
1.09
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
Status
Zero
Mid
Hish
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
3l of43
d#AIlalpe-t Lil r-.( N I U A L {$ fi $ U ii}
Bias/D rift Determinatio ns
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 24Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Parameter O: - Outlet COr - Outlet THC - Outlet
Run I
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Resoonse
0. l6
0.20
I l.0t
I1.00
0.05
0.05
10.90
10.92
0.04
0.04
17.50
17.88
Run 2
Pretest System Zero Response
Posftest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
0.20
0.20
l1.00
l 1.00
0.05
0.06
10.92
10.88
0.04
0.04
17.88
17.40
Run 3
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
0.20
0. l6
I1.00
I I.00
0.06
0.06
r 0.88
10.91
0.04
0.04
17.40
17.66
32 of 43
zd
*axlAlAtEe
TXfiH'.{t*AL i}ft(}U#
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinine. LLC - West Bountiful. UT
Source: Heater 24Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-l 539
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO: - Outlet THC - Outlet
Run I Date 412124
Span Value
lnitial Instrument Zero Cal Response
lnitial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.02
0. l5
l 1.20
0. l6
0.20
11.01
I 1.00
22.93
0.01
10.8s
0.05
0.0s
10.90
10.92
35.00
0.04
18.08
0.04
0.04
17.50
17.88
3ias (%)
lretest Zero
losttest Zero
?retest Span
)osttest Snan
0.04
0.22
-0.83
-0.87
0. l7
0. l7
0.22
0.3 I
NA
NA
NA
NA
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.t7
-0.04
0.00
0.09
0.00
1.09
Run 2 Date 412124
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
23.02
0. l5
I 1.20
0.20
0.20
I1.00
11.00
22.93
0.01
10.85
0.05
0.06
10.92
10.88
35.00
0.04
18.08
0.04
0.04
17.88
17.40
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
0.22
0.22
-0.87
-0.87
0. l7
0.22
0.31
0. l3
NA
NA
NA
NA
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
0.00
0.04
-0.17
0.00
-t.37
Run 3 Date 4/2/24
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
23.02
0. l5
tt.20
0.20
0. l6
I 1.00
I t.00
22.93
0.01
10.85
0.06
0.06
10.88
10.91
35.00
0.04
18.08
0.04
0.04
t7.40
17.66
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posftest Snen
0.22
0.04
-0.87
-0.87
0.22
0.22
0.13
0.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
)rift (%)
Lero
\,Iid
-0. l7
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.74
33 of43
.r't..i. ","!t,: -r)-i-- ..
$e*i{e*
?.,r'^\.,s'
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-5s1 -81 s0
PGVP Vendor lD # G1 2023
EPA PROTOGOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA#
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
]c749479
125372
1900 PSIG
cc749479.202301 03-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)'t 118t2023
)1t16t2031
shra\rannn - I A
)c749479.20230103
03899767
This calibration standard has been cerlified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/53'1,
SMART.CERT
Certified Concentration(s)
rbon Dioxide
Concentration
22;93 "/"
23.02%
uncerteinty
t00g %
10.05 %
Analytical Principle
FTIR
MPA
Assayed On
utla2on
o1t1ot2o23Oxygen
Balance
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
cc738486 20211012
E80097897.2021 041 2
19.98 %
1L46 0/o
This is to certify the gases referenced have been €librated/tested, and verified to meet the defined speciflcations. This
€libration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement paramete6 to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factorof k=2 to approximate the 95% conlidence level of the measuremenl, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certilicte
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Serui@s. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into ac@unt
when determining pass or fail.
, tl ,
,,y,* - t').ttk7
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
version 02-J. Revised on 2018-09'17
34 of 43
/e*f,i!s*
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-5s1 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lO Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
RR0425'l
12511 I 1
1900 PStG
<R04251 .202:X1831 -0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certif ication Dates:
)9t2112r)23
)9t19t2031
- Shrevepon - LA
1RM251.20230831
1r]7549t18
calibration standard has been cerlifled per the May 2O12 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-1 2/531 ,
usinq orocedure G1 .
Certif ied Concentratio n(sl
Concentration
-1L1 '/.
10.99 %
Uncertainty
t0.11 o/o
t0.03 o/o
Analytical Principle
FTIR
MPA
Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide 09i2lt2023
asna2023
Balance
SMART.CERT
cc737012.20230228
EAOO22021 20140323
1162980025 0911812023
017146467 09121t2023
This is to certify the gases referencrd have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technicl Gas Services. tf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into accounl
when detemining pass orfail.
r\ tl
y.^--- i,n"t*,
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Ve6ion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
35 of43
&MrMffiffi
an Air Liquide company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
6110 Uniteal Drive
Durham, NC 27713
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF AIYALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number: E02N199E1540930
CylinderNumber: E80071515Laboratory: 124 - Durham (SAP) - NC
PGVP Number: 822017
Gas Code: PPN,BALN
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume.
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
122-124598794-1
144.4 CF
2015 PS|G
350
Jan 24,2017
Expiration Date: Jan 24, 2025
Certilication performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 20'12)" document EPA
600/R-1 2/531 , using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no signmcant impurities which affecl the use of this calibration mixture. All concenlrations are on a
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sionafrrra on file
volume/volume basis unless otherwise noied
Component Requested
Concentration
ANALYTICAL RESULTSActual Protocol
Concentration Method
Total Relative
Uncertainty
Assay
Dates
PROPANE 3O.OO PPM 30.38 PPM
NITROGEN Balance
G1 +l- O.7o/o NIST Traceable 0112412017
CALIBRATION STANDARDSTvpe Lot lD Cvlinder No Concentration Uncertaintv Expiration Date
NTRM 16061104 CC482554 s0.06 PPM PROPANE/NITROGEN +/- 0.5 Ju\26.2022
lnstrumenUMake/Model
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analvtical Princiole Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet 6700 AHR0801333 C3H8 FTIR Jan 05. 2017
Approved for Release
36 of43
Page 1 of 122-124598794-1
*/
AtlarpEr
TL{] :, 1., r*A i- Li ft f-)Ll,
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refininq, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
QA Data
Source Heater 24Hl
Project No.AST-2024-1539
Parameter(s) VFR
Date Pitot ID Evidence of Evidence of
il;^,tif-hanlt
Calibration or
D-^ai- ra-irad"
4t2t24 PG-96 no no no
Date Probe or
Th rD
Reference Indicated Difference Criteria
4/2t24 PG-96 208.0 207 0 0.lo/o i 1.5 % (absolute)
Date Barometric Pressure f,vidence of Reading Verified uauDratlon or
D-^-i- ---i-dt Barometer ID
4t2t24 Barometer No Yes No
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure l,eak Check
4t2/24 M5-2600 Pass
37 of43
DGM Calibration-Orifi ces
Document lI 620.004
Revisiol 23.0
Effective Dan 1/2s/23
lssuinq Department Tech Seryices Paq(1of1
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console lD: lvi5-26
Meter S/N: 16621844
Critical Orifice S/N: 1330
Calibration Detail
nitial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
:inal Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (PbF)
\veraoe Barometric Pressure, in. Hq (Pb)
25 65
25.66
25.66
Critifcal Orifice lD (Y)
K' Factor, ft3.R'2 / in. wc.min (K)
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (V,
Initial DGt\.4 Volume, ftr (vmr)
Final DGM Volume, ft3 (Vmr)
Total DGM volume. ft3 (vm)
1330-31
0.8429
14.0
943.576
954.771
'11.',]95
1330-31 1330-25
0.6728
15.0
968.638
977523
8.885
1330-25 1330-19
0.5186
17.0
992.375
999.338
6.963
1330{9
0.8429 4.673 0.519
14.0
954.771
965.986
11.215
15.0
977.523
986.413
8.890
17.0
999.388
1,006.383
6.995
Ambient Temperature, "F (Ta)
lnitial DGN/ Temperature, 'F (Tm)
Final DGM Temperature, "F Clmr)
Averaoe DGM Temoerature, 'F ( Tm)
67
66
66
66
67
66
67
67
66
67
67
67
67
ot
67
67
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, ft3 (Vmstd)
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vco
lveter Correction Factor m
Tolerance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Tolerance
Orifice Cal Check
10.00
3.50
9.7342
9.4226
0.968
0.002
1.928
0.030
10.00
3.50
9.7423
9.4226
0.961
0.003
1926
0.028
10.00
2.20
7.6825
7.5282
0.980
0.010
1 888
0.010
10.00
2.20
7.6868
7.5211
0 978
0.008
1.892
0.006
10.00
1.30
5.9938
5.7918
0 966
0.004
1.876
0.021
10.00
1.30
6.0214
5.7918
0 962
0.008
1.876
0.021
1.18 1.57 1.54
lleter Correction Factor ft')0.970
lrifice Calibration Value IAH (a)1_898
)ositive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Equipment Oetail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make: Of./EGA
Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A
Reference Calibrator S/N: T -197 207
Calibration Detail
Reference Temp Display Temp.Accuracy Difference
r t OR %OF
0
68
100
460
528
560
0
67
100
460
527
560
0.0
0.2
0.0
0
,l
0
223
248
273
683
708
733
223
247
272
683
707
732
0.0
0.1
01
0
1
1
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1,660
298
399
498
598
699
799
899
1,000
1,101
1,201
758
859
958
1,058
1,159
1,259
1,359
1,460
1,561
1,661
0.3
01
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
Personnel
Reviewed By: Stacey Cunninqham
38 of43
Calibration By: RYAN LYONS
Calibration Dare. 11/3 12023
AIAIEe
T&$i{NlUPiL $}tOU13
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater24Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Datez 41212024
Traverse Point Time o2
(ohl
CO,
(ohl
A-l
2
3
l6: l8
l6: l9
l6.,20
5.60
5.31
5.31
5.4
8.85
9.06
9.07
9.0Average
Criteria IUet slngle Polnt slngle rolnt
39 of 43
40 of43
24Ht Test Process Data_VOC Testing
Year 2024
Meter: 24-F14014
Description: Fuel Gas flow to 24H1
Units: mscf/d
Notes:
Test Data
Start End
Run 1 412/2024 L6:38 41212024 77:37
Run 2 412/2024 t8:O3 41212024 79:02
Run 3 4/212024 L9:25 4121202420:24
Testine Process Data
mscf/d
Run 1 707.42
Run 2 706.59
Run 3 695.00
>90% Production Check
TestinB Rate 3.Year Max o/o
mscf/d mscf/d of 3-Year rMax
Run 1 707.42 69s.07 L0L.78o/o
Run 2 706.59 695.07 LOL.66%
Run 3 69s.00 695.07 99.99%
4 I of43
SamplelD
Sample Date/Time
Unit Name
Code Name
Completed Date/Time
HYDROGEN-MOL
C6PLUS-MOL
co2_MoL
METHANE-MOL
ETHANE-MOL
ETHYLENE-MOL
PROPANE_MOL
CYCLOPROPANE-MOL
PROPYLENE-MOL
ISOBUTANE-MOL
NBUTANE-MOL
PROPADIENE-MOL
ACETYLENE-MOL
H2S-MOL
T2BUTENE-MOL
ISOPENTANE-MOL
lBUTENE-MOL
ISOBUTENE-MOL
C2BUTENE-MOL
NPENTANE-MOL
NITROGEN_MOL
l3BUTADIENE-MOL
T2PENTENE-MOL
co_MoL
2MBUTENE2-MOL
IPENTENE-MOL
C2PENTENE-MOL
NHEXANE-MOL
NHEPTANE-MOL
BENZENE_MOL
CALC-GHV-GAS
CALC-NHV-GAS
CALC-SP-GRAV-GAS
CALC-MW
Total
Argon/Oxygen
Cyclobutane
3MB1
L097233
4/t/20246:00
Fuel Gas
MIXEDFUELGAS
41t1202412:32
34.6842
0
0
35.1803
L0.5791
4.4894
L4.79t9
0
0
0.1515
0
0
0
0
o.L236
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t717.32
LOtz.54
0.6088
L7.5
100
0
0
0
42 of 43
IIffiEP/\RTMENT oF
e[VrnouYgt{4ggualtlr
DIVISION OFAIR QUALITY
43 of43
Heater 24H1 VOC
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, 19 & 25A
Source Information
Company Name HF Sinclair
Company Contact:Travis Smith
Contact Phone No.801-299-6625
Stack Designation:Heater 24H1
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:4/2/2024 &
Review Date: 5/13/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
VOC NOX CO VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu 0.0054 0.00004
lbs./hr.
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
45.50 11.291 0.9760 1.957 0.84 24.54 -0.17
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8370

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Heater 24H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
HF Sinclair
Heater 24H1
Average Emission
Dry VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.00004 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 0.01 9.22 5.31
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry VOC
NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)0.0000 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 0.000E+00
lbs./hr.0.00000000 9.21 5.33
ppm corrected for %O2 0.00 9.06 5.35
Run 2
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)0.00 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft -1.143E-09
lbs./hr.-0.000465 9.19 5.30
ppm corrected for %O2 0.00 9.06 5.33 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)0.00 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.291E-08
lbs./hr.0.01 9.27 5.29
ppm corrected for %O2 0.04 9.11 5.31 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Heater 24H1 VOC
Calibration Error Test
Test Date April 2, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.02
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.65% Passed Cal.
RR04251 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.99 11.20 0.21 0.91% Passed Cal.
CC749479 01/16/31 High-level 23.02 23.10 0.08 0.35% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 47.74%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date April 2, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 22.93
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.044% Passed Cal.
RR04251 09/19/31 Mid-level 11.10 10.85 0.25 1.090% Passed Cal.
CC749479 01/16/31 High-level 22.93 22.93 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 48.41%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date April 2, 2024 VOC
CS - Cal. Span 30.38
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.132% Passed Cal.
EB0071515 01/24/25 Mid-level 18.00 18.08 0.08 0.263% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.38 30.47 0.09 0.296% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 59.25%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date NOx
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Heater 24H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Heater 24H1
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.01 0.15
Mid-Level 18.08 10.85 11.20
High-Level 30.47 22.93 23.10
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 18.08 10.85 11.20
Low-Level 0.13% 0.04% 0.65%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.15
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.26% 1.09% 0.91%
ppmdv Difference 0.08 0.25 0.21
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.30% 0.00% 0.35%
ppmdv Difference 0.09 0 0.08
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.16 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.17% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.04 0.01
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.50 10.90 11.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 1.91% TRUE TRUE 0.22% 0.83%
Difference 0.58 TRUE TRUE 0.05 0.19
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/2/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
0.04 9.1 5.4 CO
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 39.5% 23.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.17% 0.22%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.88 10.92 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.66% TRUE TRUE 0.31% 0.87%
Difference 0.2 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.00% 0.17% Drift
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 1.25% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.04%
Difference 0.4 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Heater 24H1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
11.291 24.54 -0.17 24.53 205 9.21 5.33 85.46 29.69 27.85
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 1.0583
0.9760 0.84 31.698 101.00 67 25.412 4.754 0.1576 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.2544 18.030 477,153 12,215 401,955.71 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.05 0.224 202 66 65 540 505 34.7
2 0.06 0.245 201 67 65 500 478 21.7
3 0.08 0.283 203 67 66 350 311 39.2
4 0.09 0.300 202 69 67 585 579 5.4
5 0.08 0.283 205 69 67
6 0.07 0.265 208 69 66
7 0.06 0.245 206 69 67
8 0.05 0.224 203 69 66
9 0.04 0.200 204 69 65
10 0.05 0.224 206 68 66
11 0.07 0.265 205 68 67
12 0.08 0.283 208 68 66
13 0.09 0.300 207 68 66
14 0.07 0.265 204
15 0.07 0.265 207
16 0.04 0.200 206
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Heater 24H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Heater 24H1
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.01 0.15
Mid-Level 18.08 10.85 11.20
High-Level 30.47 22.93 23.10
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 18.08 10.85 11.20
Low-Level 0.13% 0.04% 0.65%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.15
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.26% 1.09% 0.91%
ppmdv Difference 0.08 0.25 0.21
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.30% 0.00% 0.35%
ppmdv Difference 0.09 0 0.08
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.17% 0.22%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.04 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.88 10.92 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.66% TRUE TRUE 0.31% 0.87%
Difference 0.2 TRUE TRUE 0.07 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/2/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
0.03 9.0 5.3 CO
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 39.4% 23.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.06 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.22% 0.22%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.40 10.88 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 2.24% TRUE TRUE 0.13% 0.87%
Difference 0.7 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.04% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 1.58% TRUE TRUE 0.17% 0.00%
Difference 0.5 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Heater 24H1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
11.29 24.54 -0.17 24.53 205 9.19 5.30 85.52 29.68 27.95
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 1.0692
0.9760 0.84 32.205 95.50 67 25.821 4.495 0.1483 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.2556 18.08 478,117 12,248 407,223.46 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.05 0.224 200 68 65 583 540 43.3
2 0.06 0.245 206 68 66 510 500 10.1
3 0.07 0.265 215 68 65 388 350 37.2
4 0.08 0.283 203 68 65 590 585 4.9
5 0.08 0.283 199 68 66
6 0.07 0.265 204 68 66
7 0.06 0.245 205 68 66
8 0.05 0.224 205 68 65
9 0.05 0.224 204 69 65
10 0.06 0.245 207 69 65
11 0.07 0.265 210 69 66
12 0.08 0.283 208 69 67
13 0.08 0.283 206
14 0.07 0.265 205
15 0.06 0.245 203
16 0.06 0.245 205
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Heater 24H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 Heater 24H1
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.01 0.15
Mid-Level 18.08 10.85 11.20
High-Level 30.47 22.93 23.10
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 18.08 10.85 11.20
Low-Level 0.13% 0.04% 0.65%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.15
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.26% 1.09% 0.91%
ppmv Difference 0.08 0.25 0.21
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.30% 0.00% 0.35%
ppmv Difference 0.09 0 0.08
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.06 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.22% 0.22%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.05 0.05
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.40 10.88 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 2.24% TRUE TRUE 0.13% 0.87%
Difference 0.68 TRUE TRUE 0.03 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/2/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
0.2 9.1 5.3 CO
0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 39.7% 23.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.06 0.16 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.22% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.66 10.91 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 1.38% TRUE TRUE 0.26% 0.87%
Difference 0.4 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.00% 0.17% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.86% TRUE TRUE 0.13% 0.00%
Difference 0.3 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Heater 24H1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
11.29 24.54 -0.17 24.53 206 9.27 5.29 85.44 29.69 28.02
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 1.0815
0.9760 0.84 34.932 99.20 68 27.964 4.669 0.1431 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.2506 17.71 467,937 11,998 400,982.21 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.05 0.224 202 69 65 624 583 41.2
2 0.06 0.245 203 69 65 521 510 11.6
3 0.07 0.265 205 69 66 426 388 38.7
4 0.08 0.283 205 69 66 592 585 7.7
5 0.08 0.283 204 69 67
6 0.06 0.245 205 69 67
7 0.06 0.245 207 69 68
8 0.05 0.224 206 69 67
9 0.05 0.224 206 69 67
10 0.05 0.224 208 69 67
11 0.07 0.265 209 69 67
12 0.08 0.283 202 69 67
13 0.07 0.265 204 69 66
14 0.07 0.265 208
15 0.06 0.245 210
16 0.05 0.224 210
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog