DAQ-2024-008003

1

DAQC-455-24
Site ID 10123 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – HOLLY FRONTIER WOODS CROSS REFINERY, LLC

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: May 13, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Heater 25H1
Contact: Travis Smith – 801-299-6625
Location: 1070 West 500 South, West Bountiful, UT 84087
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
FRS ID #: UT0000004901100013
Permit/AO#: Approval Order AN101230057-23 dated November 15, 2023
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated May 7, 2024

On May 7, 2024, DAQ received a test report for the Holly Frontier Woods Cross Refinery, LLC in Davis
County, UT. Testing was performed on April 3, 2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits
found in Approval Order condition II.B.6.d. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Test Method Pollutant DAQ Result Tester Result Limit

25H1 4/3/2024 25A VOC 0.0011* 0.0015* 0.0054*

*lbs./MMBtu

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted in the test report.

CONCLUSION: Heater 25H1 emissions were within limits at the time of the
inspection. No test deviations were noted.

RECOMMENDATION: Heater 25H1 emissions were within Approval Order emission
limits. No further action required.

HPV: N/A

ATTACHMENTS: Stack Test report dated May 7, 2024, and UDAQ Spreadsheets

6 , 3
,.dttF$nctorr
I,TAH DEPARTMENI OF
EI{VIRONMEMAL OUAUIY
l\,lAY - 7 2A24
ion,l d*l i vvrerl-
DIVISION OF AtR QUALITV
VOC Performance Test Report - 25Hl FCC Feed Heater
IIF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC, Davis County
Dear Mr. Bird:
ln accordance with Conditions II.B.l.a and II.B.6.d of Approval Order ANI01230057-23, please find
enclosed the results of our recent VOC emissions testing for process heater 25H1. The testing was
conducted April3, 2024. The test results were 0.0015lbslt\dMBtu forVOC.
Enclosed, please find a copy of the testing report for process heater 25H1.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at [phone] or email at
ftravis. [e-mail].
I certifu that:
Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions specified in the
applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation;
During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained process conditions
representative ofnormal operations, and operated under such other relevant conditions specified by the
Director;
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information
contained in the report are true, accurate, and complete.
Sincerely,
Hand Delivered
May 7,2024
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Division of Air Quality
Utah Dept. of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake city, Utah 841l6
RE:
?d^ 5,*--^ --,/<
Dustin Simmonds
Vice President and Refinery Manager
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC
1070 W. 500 S, West Bountiful, UT 84087
801 -299-6600 | HFSinclair.com
Enclosure
c: E. Benson (r)File2.4.4
K. Arnold
J. Barton
M. Jessop
Allare
Source Test Report
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful. UT 84087
Source Tested: Heater 25Hl
Test Dates: April 3,2024
Pro.iect No. AST-2 024 -15 39-005
-U-TAH
DI'PABT,\,iINI OIENVIRO,!tu..h{foL CUCLT j"f
#i*;,8*i l t, v' €;"l,cioF ArR ouir_rn
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley Ciry, UT 84120
pilrfirpe
T[rCllNlCAt GnOi,JFr Source Test Repot
Test Propmm Summary
Resulatorv Information
Permit No.
Source Information
DAQE-AN101230057-23
Source Name
Refinery Gas Fired Process Heater
Contact Information
Source ID
Heater 25Hl
Target Parameter
VOC
Test Location
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful, UT 84087
Facility Contacts
Eric Benson
[e-mail]
(80r) 299-6623
F. Travis Smith
ft rav is. [e-mail]
(80t)299-662s
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
charles.horton@lliancetg. com
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Tobias Hubbard
tobias. hubbard@al liancetg.com
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. [e-mail]
(8r2) 452-4785
Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]
Report Reviewer
Sarah Perry
sarah. perry@,alliancetg.com
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful. UTAST-2024- I s39-005
2 of45
Page i
pill6rrpE)
Ti:Clll'li.lAL CRCUP Source Test Reporl
C er t iJi c at io n St at ement
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer ofthis document.
4t30t2024
DateCharles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technicat Group, LLC
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 539-005
3 of45
Page ii
pulhrrce
TFCI.iN]CAI- GIICUi)Source Tesl ReporT
Table ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.l Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions................. ....... l-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ............ l-l
3. I U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate ........ 3- I
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 34 - Oxyger/Carbon Dioxide ................ 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content.......... .................... 3- l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A -Volatile Organic Compounds ....... 3-l
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification.. .....................3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A..............................................3-2
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A............................................ 3-3
LIST OF TABLES
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful. UTAST-2024- I 539-005
4 of45
Page iii
5 of45
pulhrpe
Ii:CI]NICAI GiIOIJP Source Test Repon
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC (HF Sinclair)
to conduct compliance testing at the Woods Cross Refinery in West Bountiful, Utah. Portions of the facility are
subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit
No. DAQE- AN101230057-23. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of volatile organic compounds
(VOC) from the exhaust of Heater 25H l.
1.1 Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-l: Project Team
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by HF Sinclar.
IIF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT
Unit ID Process Descriotion Air Pollution Controls
2sHt Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) #2 Feed
Heater, 17.7 MMBtU/hr HHV, fired on plant gas, natural
draft, 3 burners, and up-fired furnace. Stack temperature
aooroximatelv 65OoF.
Ultra-low NOx burners
HF Sinclair Personnel F. Travis Smith
Alliance Personnel
Tobias Hubbard
Supilani Mailei
Cael Krahn
AST-2024- I 539-005
6 of45
Page l-l
7 of45
pill6rrc.e
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Repon
Sumnary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Woods Cross Refinery in West Bountiful, UT on April 3,2024.
Testing consisted of determining the emission rate of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the exhaust of Heater
25H1.
Table 2-l provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ limits. Any
difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices
is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-l: Summary of Results
olatile Organic Compounds* Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Concentration, ppmvd @l5o/o Oz
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Factor, lblltlMBtu
Permit Limit, lb/lvlMBtu
Percent of Limit,7o
1.52
t.28
0.0097
0.0018
0.64
0.s3
0.0043
0.00074
l.6l
1.30
0.010
0.0018
1.26
1.04
0.0081
0.0015
0.0054
28
' Measured as total hydrocarbons (as propane)
l
tlF Sinclair - West Bountiful, LITAST-2024- I 539-005
E of45
Page 2-l
9 of45
put6rpe
I F C i] N i C A I CIRCUP Source Test Report
Testins Methodolosy
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperafure readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3,A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on
the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A -Volatile Organic Compounds
The volatile organic compounds (VOC) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
25A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT
Volatile Organic Compounds
Gas Dilution System Certification
AST-2024- I 539-005
l0 of45
Page 3-l
AI
Source Tbst Repon
Testing Methodolont
probe, heated Teflon sample line(s) and the identified gas analyzer. The quality control measures are described in
Section 3.7.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on
each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed within 2oh of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 2%. These steps
were repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol | (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5o/o
absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5%o (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5o/o (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-Level gas
was zero gas, the response was 0.5% or 5.0 percent ofthe upscale gas concentration (whichever was less restrictive).
The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The measurement
system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was within 5.0
percent ofthe Calibration Span or 0.5o/o absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.57o absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and System
Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute
difference. Ifthe drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5oh, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
W't'*'
TA rEe
'' : ' '\ | i)
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 539-005
I I of45
Page 3-2
AI
Source Tbst Report
Testing Methodologt
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each
traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time.
If the diluent concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.3%o (whichever was less
restrictive) ofthe average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test runs. If
the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than l0 percent or 0.5o/o from the
average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - 16.7, 50.0
and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter -0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the
stack wall). Ifthe pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 0.5o/o from the average concentration,
then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol 1 (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Within two (2) hours prior to testing, zero gas was introduced through the sampling system to the analyzer. After
adjusting the analyzer to the Zero gas concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value
was recorded. This process was repeated for the High-Level gas, and the time required for the analyzer reading to
reach 95 percent of the gas concentration was recorded to determine the response time. Next, Low and Mid-Level
gases were introduced through the sampling system to the analyzer, and the response was recorded when it was
stable. All values were less than +/- 5 percent ofthe calibration gas concentrations.
Mid-Level gas was introduced through the sampling system. After the analyzer response was stable, the value was
recorded. Next, Zero gas was introduced through the sampling system, and the analyzer value recorded once it
reached a stable response. The Analyzer Drift was less than +/- 3 percent ofthe span value.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
lEeWta
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UIAST-2024- I 539-005
12 of 45
Page 3-3
I
l3 of45
RIIffi]EB"i' t_ {, 1 i fi* I cA L G n c} i,., P
Lo""tioo
Soo"""
Preje*No. IST-2024-1539
Pammtc4s;
Meter Pr6sure (Pm), in. Hg
AH
. Pm = Pb+136-
wnetct
Pb____]!.]2_= barometnc prcsure, in Hg
AH 1.000 = prcsure differential oforifice, in HrO
Pm---i6li!-= in. Hg
Absolutc St.ckGrs Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
Po
Ps = Pb+*
- IJ.t)whre.
Pb 30.12 = barometric pressure, in. Hg
"*E=
rtatic presure, in. H2o
Ps lO.D =in Hg
Standard Meaer Volum (Vmtd), dscf
17.536xVmxPmxY
Vmtd =Tm
0-916 = meter corction f&tor.......ffi=
metervolume, cf
= absolute meterpressure, in. Hg
= absolute meter temperature, "R
= dscf
Stendrrd Wet Vdum (Vwstd), s.f
Vsld= 0.047l6xVlc
V" ____]??j_= *eight of H2O collected, g
Vstd 5.791 =scf
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimnsionless (theoreti.al at satur.ted.onditions)
,0u.,,-(fff#)BWSsat =where,D.
= stack temperature, oF
= absolute stack 96 pressure, in. Hg
= dimensionless
Moisturc Fr.ction (BWS), diremionless
Vwstd
BWS =/\/r^rst l + \/fr<t.l\
flL=st-dud retrclume, scf
_:lgL= ttnndard meter volume, dscf
0 159 -dimensionless
Moisaure Frrction (BWS), direroionlcss
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat ( BWSmsd
wherc,
BWSat 1.000 = misture fraction (theoretical at saturated @nditions)
BWSmd _.,19:lL= ruisture fraction (meoued)
BWS 0.159
Mole.ular Wcigbl (DRY) (Md), lbnb-mole
Md = (0.44 x o/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- 7oCO2 - 0/oO2))
where,
COr4= cdbon dioxide concsfiation, 70
O, ____jj_ = oxygen concmtration, o/o
Md___12.4_= ttnu *t
Example Calculations
Y
Pm
Tm
Vmtd
Vstd
VNtd
BWS
Ts 527 1B-lor-
BWSsar 1.000
14 of45
NAliatrcG)
Tt**:rN lcAL GF** t"'
Molecul.r Wcight (wET) (Ms),lb b-mle
Ms = Md (1 - BwS) + 18.015 (BwS)
vhere.
Md 29.74 = molecular reisht (DRY), lb/lb ml
gws
-6Jtt-=
misture fraction, dimensionless
tvts-TiI-= bilb rcl
Avcr.ge Vclocity (Vs), ft/s.c
. Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (APt/z)avg xwhcrc.
Cp 0.84 = pitot tube @efficient
A P"'-9L=
'verage
pre/post test velocity head of stack gc, (in' H2o)L
Ts 987.0 = average pre/post test ab$lute stack temperature, oR
Ps 30.12
trts-ZEd-
'- (***-)
0.976
60_!.L
536.7
t.951
Jo-jil
29.74
1.000
-io--
Example Calculations
Locaaion
Sourcc
Prejet No.
Run No.
Prrrmtcr{s)
= absolute shck 96 pressure, in. Hg
: molecular wight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
= ft/sec
Average StackGas Flo{.t St ck Cotrdiiions (Qa), acfm
Qa = 60x Vs x As
where.
Vs 5.t = stack gas relocity, IVsec
As 6.68 = cross-sectional area ofstack, ft2
Qa@=acfin
Averuge StrckGas Flow at Strndard Coodiaions (Qs), dscfm
Qsd= l7.636xQax(l -BWS)x
Qa 2,054 = average stack gc flow at stack @nditions, acfih
BwS 0.159 = misture fraction, dimensionless
P"_l!Jz_= nbrclute stack g6 pressure, in. Hg
Ts 987.0 = average prelpost test absolute stack temperatue, "R
Q.--::-d-= ds"f-
Dry Crs Meter Crlibmaion Check (Yqr). pcr.fft
Ps
Ts
Yqa =
wh€rc,
x 100
o
Tm
^It@Pb
AH avg
Md
(a tO'o
Yqa
= meter cor*tion facto( dimensionless
- M time, min.
= tota.l meter volume, dcf
= abslule meter temperature, "R
= orifice meter calibration coeflicimt, in. I{2O
= barometric pressure, in. Hg
= average prosure differential oforifice, in HrO
= mlsular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
= average square root pressure differential oforifice, (in. I{rO)ltr
= percent
l5 of45
,csp#8s!AlltalEe
YS{:CN{fip,L *}ieC.)Ury
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Example Calculations
Source: Heater 25Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 3,{
r Oz - Outlet Concentration (C6,), % dry
I Co,= (Cou,-Co)- ( ?&h)
where,Cob, 4.02 : average analyzer value during test, 7o dry
Co
-0'20-:
average of pretest & posttest zero responses , o/o dry
CMA-TO-il99-= actual concentration of calibration gas,o/o dry
CM-Tf.T-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, %o dry
Co, --T88-: Oz Concentr ation, o/o dry
COz - Outlet Concentration (Cs6J, 9/o dry
Cco,= (Cou,-Co)l< ( Tfr;)
where,Cou, 9.65 : average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co
-0:O-
= average of pretest & posttest zero responses , o/o dry
CMA-Tf:IO- = actual concentration of calibration gas, o/o dry
CM-T03il-: average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, %o dry
Cco,-38-: Coz Concentration, % dry
l6 of45
ffi:-Aliarpe
l f: l.; ll N i i.,ri i r-: li (.' 1,; f)
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 25Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Run No. /Method Run I / Method 25A
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (Crrc), ppmvd
Crnc*trra--ffi
where,
Crnc*
BWS
Crnc
C<THCc15>:
where,
Crnc
co,
CcTHCcl5>
3.88
0.53
MW 44.1
1.28 = THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvw
= moisture fraction, unitless: ppmvd
: THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
: oxygen concentration. 7o
: ppmvd @15%Oz
= THC molecular weight, g/g-mole
: stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
0.1 59
1.52
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (Cruc*), ppmvw
UTHCw Cs6x(l -BWS)
where,
Cnrc 1.52 = THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
BWS 0.159 : moisture fraction, unitless
Crr"*-E-=ppmvw
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (C<THCcl5>), ppmvd @ lsyo O,
Cruc x
1.52
THC - Outlet Emission Rate (as C3H8) (ERs6)' lb/hr
- Crsc x MW x Qs x 60 T xzt.lzhW
where,
Crr.-!.|-= THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
Qs
ERnrc
930
0.010 = lb/hr
THC - Outlet Emission Factor (as C3H8) (EFrnco,a)' lb/lVlMBtu
trrTHCod -
Coc
ERs6xKxFdx (75,ffi;)
t.52 : THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
K 1.14533E-07 : constant, lb/dscf ppmvd
Fd 8,370 : fuel factor, dscflMMBtu
Co, 3.88 : oxygen concentration, To
where,
EFmco,a 0.0018 : lb/\4MBtu
17 of 45
l8 of45
c'*:ffiAlia Emissions Calculations
Lo""tioo
Source Heater 25Hl
Project No. AST-2024-1539
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date
Sta( Time
Stoo Time
4t3t24
l3:00
l3:59
4t3t24 4t3t24
14:33 15:55
15:32 16:54
Source Data
Fuel Factor (O2 drvl- dscflMMBtu Fd 8,370 8,370 8,370 8,370
Input Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml-4), dscfm
BWS
Qs
0.1 59
930
0.171
971
0.194 0.175
940 947
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration,Yodry co" 3.88 3.52 3.34 3.58
COz Concentration, 7o dry cco, 9.88 10.21 10.34 10.14
THC (as C:Ha) Concentration, ppmvd
THC (as CrHa) Concentration, ppmuv
THC (as CrHa) Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 yoO,
THC (as C:Hr) Emission Rate, lb/hr
THC (as C,H') Emission Factor, lb/lVIMBtu (O2d)
Cnrc
C*c*
Cr"c",s
ERmc
EF *c nra
1.52
1.28
0.53
0.0097
0.0018
0.64 l.6l t.26
0.53 L30 1.04
0.22 0.54 0.43
0.0043 0.010 0.0081
0.00074 0.0018 0.0015
19 of45
,dll#
Atlalrce?r,c*NrfiAt *a*1"; p
Method I Data
Locdion HF Sinchirwmds Cre!!
source He.tcr ,5Hl
Proi6r No. AST-202.I-1539
Drrc 0l/03/2{
DuctOrientrtion: Vedcal
Dud Deri8h: Circular
lristr.ce frem Frr w.ll to Outside ofPon: 45-50 in
Nipple Leogth: 10.50 in
Depth of Ducc 35.m in
Cress Sfttionrt Arer of Duct: 6.68 ftI
No, ofTsa Pod,: 2
Number of Rerdingi pcr Pointl 2
u,srn"" l, ----lii-r
Dirtrnc€ A Duct Dirmet€rs:-----ii-1.rst be ' 0.51
Di(rne B: l5?5 fi
Disl.nce B Duct Dirmeten: 5.1.0 (musl be > 2)
Minimrm Numb.rof Tr$rrePoints: 12
Aco.l Number of Trtvcrue Points: 8
Tnv€e
Point
'/6 of Dislrnce
Diameter outsidc of
I
3
{
5
6
7
E
9
l0
ll
6.1
25.0
75.0
93.3
215
8.75
26.25
32:6
t2 7/8
19 v4
36 3/1
{l l/E
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE FONTS
Nufrbq of tatw Nints on a d@mdet
I
3
{
5
6
7
I
9
l0
tt
l,
3 I 5 6 7 t lo II tz
l{.6
85.1
6.7
25.0
75.0
93.3
4.1
It.6
29.6
?0.1
85.1
956
3.2
10.5
19.{
32.t
61.1
80.6
89.5
,-u-*
2.6
8.2
l{.6
22.6
31.2
65.8
11.1
85.1
9Lt
971
2.1
6.1
ll.E
t1.7
25.0
35.6
61{
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
+P?rcent oflod dtaD'et?rfon nstde eal to truvene point
Sbck DiaSam
A=71i.
B = 157.5 fl
Depth ofDuct = 35 in.
Crcss ScclioMl Area
Disturbance
Upstream
Disturbance
20 of 45
NAItatrce-rrfiilr.irfi&L fififi{Jr Cyclonic Flow Check
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinine,LLC - West Bountiful' UT
Source Heater 25HI
Project No. AST-2024-1539
Date 413124
Sample Point Angle (AP=0)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
t2
l3
t4
t5
16
Averase
8
l0
8
7
8
2
4
0
4
I
2
3
4
6
6
8
5.1
2l of 45
w'Altarpe
i L {.i ii N i {:A 1.._ ii fi {) tJ i+
Field Data
Method ZData
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Relinine. LLC - West Bountiful UI
Source H€ater 25Hl
Project No. AST-202+1539
I
4t3t24
VALID
l: l3
13:20
Pass
a
4t3124
VALID
l4:34
14.39
Pass
3
4/3124
VALID
l6:04
16:ll
Pass
I
a
3
4
5
6
7
8
bl
)
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.007
0.006
0.004
0 003
0 003
0.003
0 004
0.005
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.003
500
516
520
521
525
532
s32
533
530
533
533
s34
535
533
s30
530
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.004
0 005
0.006
0.007
0 006
0.005
0.004
515
522
520
524
526
s26
527
528
528
526
530
530
531
532
534
537
0.003
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.003
0 003
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
510
515
521
527
531
533
537
s30
538
540
541
538
540
s42
542
542
0.066
0.00
0.840
30.12
-0.02
30.12
527.3
987.0
0.159
1.000
0.159
3.88
9.88
29.74
27.88
5.1
2,054
66,3 l4
1,t05
930
0.070
0.00
0.840
30.12
-0.02
30.12
527.3
986.9
0. l7l
L000
0. l7l
3.52
t 0.21
29.77
27.76
5.4
2,178
70,324
1,172
971
0.069
0.00
0.840
30.t2
-0.02
30.12
532.9
992.6
0.1 94
1.000
0.1 94
3.34
10.34
29.79
27.s|
5.4
2,177
69,908
1,165
940
0.068
0.00
0.840
30.12
-0.02
30.12
529.2
988.8
o.174
1.000
0.174
3.s8
10. l4
29.77
27.72
5.3
2,136
68,849
|,147
947
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)tn (AP)t"
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp)
Bammetric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
Stetic Pressure, in. WC (Pg)
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Temperature, oF (Ts)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture I'raction @ Saturation (BWSsat)
Moisture Fraction (BWS)
02 Concentration, T" (O2)
CO2 Concentration, 7o (CO2)
:cular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry) (Md)
rular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, fUsec (Vs)
YFR at stack conditions, acfm (Qa)
VFR at standard conditions, scfh (Qsw)
VFR at standard conditions, scfm (Qsw)
at standard conditions. dscfm
22 of 45
.dAliatrceTFCf-.tr{!cAt* {}fi$ui}
Method 4Data
hrhn HF Sinclrir Wmd! Cms
Seft(
Pmj6l No,
Console Unitr /Mdhod
on No.
,rte
itrtu.
itrn Time
lnd Time
lun Time, min (0)
,d.r m
I
1/3/21
VALID
I l:00
ll:m
60
M5-2600
1^t24
VALID
lJ:33
l5:33
60
J
4/3/24
VALID
l6:00
l7:m
m
tleter Codion Fdor (Y)
)rifre Cdibmtioo Vrlue ( II @)
tlrt V.cuum, in. llg
o.916
t.951
3
o.916
L957
3
om
o.916
t.9i7
3
om
0
5
l0
l5
20
25
30
35
{0
{5
50
t5
lotd MErer Volnme. fd
n2.248
71t.1N
117.590
780.r{o
782.190
785.140
788.070
190.190
193.320
795.940
798.690
801.250
8U.010
80{.665
808.010
8r0.730
813.520
816.380
8t9.020
821.010
824.560
827.380
810.0m
812.910
835.r30
838.120
838.206
8{0.330
8.t2.760
8J5.r30
t47.630
850.260
852.710
855.230
t57.890
860.210
862.280
t.210
K J7O
l@psrforc,
0
s
l0
l5
20
25
30
35
l0
{5
50
60
lverrge Tempenlurc, otr
lvenge Tmpcn0rc,6R
YlinimuE Tempcraturc,oF
tr[in{m TenDentur-'F
Crm)
(Tm)
Mder
11
76
76
76
71
16
16
16
71
78
78
79
79
11
531
16
Probe triltel Vrcu lmp Eri
6
6t
10
70
68
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
66
Mater
71
77
11
77
11
71
16
16
15
15
15
15
15
76
536
75
t'1
Pob.Filter I6p. Eri
65
65
6
65
65
65
65
65
6
66
65
65
6t
'.
Mdcr
80
80
8l
8l
E{
86
88
9l
9l
9t
9l
92
9l
t7
5%
80
Pobc Silter Imp. Exir
6
6
61
67
61
61
61
65
65
65
65
;
,rnmetricPrcrlurc,ln,Hg (Pb)
Vlcter Orifie Pru!$rc , in. WC ( H)
lleterPBur, in. Hg (Pm)
30.12
l_000
30.19
30.12
t.m
30.t9
l2 15{
10.12
0.m
30.18
26.a12
rntylB rype
:mpinger l, Pre/Port Tst, g
:mpitrger 2, Pre/Polt Tst, g
:mpingcr 3, Pre/Port Tdt, g
mpiogcr {, Pre/Poal Tdt, t
y'olum.Wrtercollsted, mL (Vlc)
Itrndrrdwrt€rvolume,fl (Vsrtd)
troirt!rc Frrction Mersrcd (BWS)
;s Molcul.r Weighr, lbnFoote (dry) Grd)
DGM Crlibnftr Gftkvdue (Yor)
Go
H20
H20
Empq
Silica
5.t6.5
502.t
3l1.3
494.9
6tJ
5t{
352
195
6t.8
t2.6
.10.8
0.6
H20
H20
E.pty
Silie
498.8
51.t.7
352.1
195.5
570.9
521.7
{10.6
{98.0
12.r
9.O
58.5
H20
H20
Empty
510.9
523.7
410.6
ill
53(
161
70.1
12.4
50.9
n2.a
5.79t
o.159
29.14
-3.0
112.1
6.701
0.171
29.11
136.8
6.151
0.t9{
29.79
23 of 45
N Run l - RM DataAlErEeYf *Hltl 1*&L fi&frtJP
Locstion: IIF Sinclair W*dt
Sou""",
P."i."t N^ .
D.tc:
Or - outlct CO, - Outlet THC - Outleto/.dr! '/"drf pptlw
Uncorrected Run Average (C.6)
Cel Gas Concenar.aion (CMA)
Prctest System Zcro R.spoN.
Posttest System Zero Rcap@s
Averrge Z.ro Response (Co)
Pretcst Syst.mCsl Rcspore
Posttest Sysaem Ctl RcapoN
Avcrage Cal Reponse (Cs)
Tim
Usit
4.02 9.65 1.28
10.99 ll.l0 18.00
0.20 0.03 0.30
0.20 0.05 0.04
0.20 0.04 0.11
I t.04 10.82 18.09
I 1.00 10.86 18.14
I 1.02 10.84 18.12
3 88 9.88 NA
l3:00
l3:01
l3:02
ll:03
l3:04
l3:05
l3:06
l3:07
l3:08
l3:09
l3: l0
l3:ll
l3:12
l3: l3
l3: l4
l3: l5
l3: l6
l3il7
l3;1 8
l3r l9
l3:20
l3:21
13:22
l3:23
l3:24
ll:25
l1:26
13:27
l1:28
13:29
l3:30
l3:3 I
13:32
l3:33
13,34
l3:35
l3:36
l3:37
l3:38
l3:39
l3:40
l3:41
l3:42
l3:43
lft44
l3:45
13t46
l3:47
l3:48
l3:49
l3:50
l3:51
l3:52
l3:53
ll:54
l3:55
l3:56
l3:57
l3:58
llr 59
4.65
4.64
4.70
4.69
4.70
4.71
4.7t
4.49
4.50
4.60
4.66
4.61
4.64
4.76
4.79
4.12
4.65
4.63
4.53
4.53
4.45
4.46
4.40
4.37
4.3t
4.29
4.25
4.22
4.27
4.32
4.29
4.24
4.27
4.15
4.00
3.88
3.73
3.70
3.50
3.60
3.53
3.48
3.44
3.48
3.44
3.37
3.38
3.34
3.26
3.30
3.26
3.tl
3.31
3.26
3.16
3.09
3.08
3.07
3.t 5
3.27
9.27
9.28
9.24
9.2t
9.24
9.31
9.37
9.33
9.28
9.31
9.31
9.28
9.22
9.21
9.31
9.31
9.37
9.37
9.42
9.4t
9.45
9.48
9.50
9.51
9.53
9.51
9.47
9.42
9.44
9.46
9.45
9.51
9.6t
9.68
9.76
9.80
9.90
9.86
9.89
9.9t
9.95
9.91
9.96
10.00
9.99
10.0 t
10.t2
10.10
10.13
10.16
10.10
10.16
10.23
t0.30
10.3 I
10.3 t
10.28
t0l8
0.33
0.26
0.76
0.04
0.06
0.40
0.25
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.20
0.40
0.28
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.01
0.04
0. t8
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.M
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.04
5.70
4.99
1.02
8.5t
6.40
4.69
3.U
2.12
2.19
2.08
l.9l
6.84
5.28
3.99
323
24 of45
allffi]rce?E(:l"rNlcAt- $&(}lip
Run2-RMData
Locrtion:
Source:
Project No.:
D.t:
Tim
Unit
Or - Outlet
./o dry
Vslid
COl- Outlea THC - Outlcto/odrf ppm
Uncorr.ctcd Run Avcrag. (C"L)
Crl Grs Conc.ntrrtion (CMA)
Preaesa System Zero Response
Posatesa Systed Zero Rcspw
Avcragc ro Rcsporec (Co)
Prctcst System Csl Rcspons.
Posttest System Cal RcspoNe
Avcragc Cd Reponsc (Cy)
Corrc.ted
3.67
10.99
0.20
0.20
0.20
I t.00
ll04
10.00 0.53
18.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
t8. l4
t8.22
I8.18
NA
0.05
0.05
0.05
10.86
10.87
10.87
to2t
l4:31
l4:34
l4:35
l4:36
l4:17
l4:38
l4:19
l4:40
l4:41
l4:42
l4:43
14,44
l4:45
14.46
l4:47
l4:48
l4:49
14i50
l4:51
14152
l4:53
l4:54
l4:55
14,56
14.57
14158
l4:59
l5:00
l5:01
l5:02
l5:03
l5:04
l5:05
l5:06
l5:07
l5:08
l5:09
t5: I0
l5:l I
l5: l2
l5:13
l5:14
l5:15
l5:16
l5: l?
l5:18
l5: l9
l5:20
l5r2l
l5:22
l5:23
l5:24
l5:25
l5:26
l5:27
l5:28
l5:29
I 5:10
l5i3l
l5:32
3.7t
3.75
3.82
3.95
3.80
3.74
317
3.63
3.80
3.67
3.73
3.80
3.92
1.80
3.78
3.78
3.80
3.74
3.68
3.70
1.64
3.82
3.87
3.71
3.79
3.78
3.79
3.73
1.75
3.11
1.54
3.62
3.79
3.84
3.70
3.64
3.69
3.76
1.75
3.62
3.59
3.50
3.54
3.55
3.55
3.50
3.64
3.59
3.64
3.50
3.46
3.48
3.35
3.41
3.43
3.40
3.40
3.12
333
9.99
9.93
9.87
9.16
9.86
9.89
9.88
10.00
9.99
9.94
9.91
9.82
9.8'1
9.90
9.93
9.93
9.90
9.95
9.99
9.97
10.00
9.90
9.85
9.91
9.91
9.93
9.99
9.96
9.98
10.03
10.04
9.93
9.87
t0.00
10.03
10.0 r
9.98
995
10.05
10.04
t0.ll
t0.07
t0.09
10.07
l0.l I
10.03
10.06
10.04
10.13
10.16
10.13
10.22
r0.18
10.18
10.19
10.1 8
10.22
10.23
0.33
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.16
0.26
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.2I
0.21
0.04
0.04
0.1 I
0.25
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.29
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.04
1.42
l.9r
4.90
7.77
4.8t
2.86
2.10
1.53
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.53
0.1 I
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.24
25 of45
Almnr:eTtrffii"{NI{:AL fiffi$IJ.$
Run3-RMData
Lo..tioni HF
Snrr... Hearcr ?5Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Tim
Unit
Strtus
Or - Outlet
'A dr!
Valid
10.99
0.20
0.20
0.20
I 1.04
I 1.00
tt.o2
3.33
174
3.12
3.4t
3.43
3.37
3.41
3.45
3.43
1.57
3.45
3.45
3.50
3.50
3.39
3.35
3.38
3.42
3.41
3.48
3.48
).47
l.5l
3.42
3.44
3.39
3.41
3.48
3.43
3.44
3.5 I
3.52
3.45
3.65
3.63
3.59
3.53
3.60
3.57
1.51
1.63
3.66
3.64
3.63
3.67
3.54
3.61
3.70
3.53
3.50
1.66
3.59
353
3.53
3.49
CO, - Outlca THC - Outleto/odry ppttw
Valid Valid
Uncorrccted Run Avcrrge (C"L)
Cal Gas Conceotr.tiotr (CMA)
Prct6t Syst.m Zcro R.spoNe
Posttest Syrtem Zero Rcspone
Avcrage Zcro RespoNe (Co)
Prctest System Cal Respoe
Posttest System Cal RespoN
Average Ctl R.sponse (CM)
l5:55
l5:56
l5:57
l5:58
l5:59
16i00
l6:01
l6:02
l6:03
l6:04
l6:05
16:06
l6:07
l6:08
l6:09
l6i l0
16:ll
l6:12
l6: l3
l6: l4
l6:15
l6: l6
l6:17
l6: l8
l6: l9
16,20
l6:21
l6:22
l6:23
l6:24
16:25
l6:26
l6:27
l6:28
l6:29
l6:30
l6:31
l6:32
l6:33
l6:34
l6:35
16i36
l6:37
l6:38
l6:39
t6:40
l6:41
l6:42
16143
16,44
l6:45
l6:46
16t47
16r48
l6:49
l6:50
l6:51
L6:52
t6:53
l6:54
1 49 l0 16 1.30
I l.l0
0.05
0.u
0.08
t0.87
10.94
10.91
t0.24
10.28
10.23
t0.20
t0.17
10.21
10.20
10.23
10.1 9
10.18
10.13
t0. t9
10.1 7
10.15
10.1 5
10.23
r0.23
t0.20
10.20
t0.19
I0.21
10.16
t0.l 7
t0.15
t0.14
10.1 7
I0.17
t0.22
t0.24
10.23
10.t8
10.20
10.21
10.15
t0. t6
10.20
10.08
10.1 7
10.09
r0.10
10.1 5
10.12
10.13
10.1 4
10.1 5
10.09
10.09
10.08
t0.09
10.09
10.1 2
l0.l I
10.06
10.15
10.1 7
10.12
10.12
t0.l 6
10.17
10.19
18.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
t8.22
18.08
18.1 5
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
1.38
5.79
3.41
2.29
t.72
1.63
1.44
L63
0.45
O,M
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
4.95
t2.59
9.84
6.28
4.41
3.35
2.45
2.50
2.3t
2.t3
t.89
1.50
0.51
0.87
0.70
0.61
26 of 45
#"Aliarpe
. i: a.l,t.:ii i a-.4:::i\::4.
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Project No.: AST-2024-l 539
FUEL FACTOR CALCULATION BASED ON FUEL ANALYSIS
COMPONENT MW WOLEo/o MOI,F],S C MOI,ES H MOI,ES O MOI,ESN MOLf,S S
HYDROGE}2.0t6 34.6842 69.368
HELIUIv 4.003
METHANE 16.043 35. r803 35. I 80 140.721
WATER 18.01 5
CARBON MONOXIDE 28.010
NITROGEN 28.013
ETHYLENE 28.054 4.4894 8.979 r 7.958
ETHANE 30.070 10.5791 2l . 158 63.475
OXYGEN 31.999
HYDROGEN SULFIDE 34.076
ARGON 39.948
PROPYLENE 42.081
CARBON DIOXIDE 44.0r0
PROPANE 44.097 14.7919 44.376 I18 335
BUTYLENES Itt 08 0.1236 0.494 0.989
ISG,BUTANE 58.24 0.15 l5 0.606 1.515
N.BUTANE 58.24
PENTENES 70 35
ISO.PENTANE 72 5I
N.PENTANE 72.5l
BENZENE 78.l4
HEXANE 86.78
TOLUENE 92 4t
HEPTANE 100.20s
ETHYLBENZENE 106. l 68
XYLENE 106.168
TOTAI 100.000 l t0.793 412.361
WEIGHT (LBS'1,330.740 415.618
WEIGHTOI 76.201 23.799 0.000 0.000 0.000
LHV (BTIJ/SCFIr 1,004 = SUM [ (MOLE%, o LHV ) + 100 ]
= SUM [ (MOLEYIi . HHV i) + 100 ]
= SUM [ (MOLE %r t DENSITY ) + 100 ]
= DENSITY (LB/SCF) + DENSITYnn @.0763 LB/SCF)
= HHV = DENSITY
=SUM[(MOLE%, . MWi)+ 100]
=1go .113.64.%oH) + (1.53oo/oC) + (0.14o%N) + (0.57'%S) - (0.46o%O) l* GCV
=196 o [(5.57.%H) +(1.53.%C) +(0.14o%N) +(0.57 %S) - (0.46.%O) ]+ GCV
= 106 , (0.321 ofiQ) + Q6.Y
=0.20goFa=F"
HHV (BTU/SCB:t.1t7.32
DENSITY (LB/SCF)I 0 045
SPECIFIC GRAVITY:0.603
GCV(BTU/LB)r 24,2'18
MW (LB/LBMOLE):t7.464
F6 @SCF/IVIMBTU):8.370
F* (WSCFMMBTU)10.262
F"(SCF/MMBTU):1,008
Expected Fo:1.736
27 of45
28 of45
N4awAlialrceTgci".ttijIcAL *ffi*Lj p
QA Data
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining,LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Sor.ce
Project No. AST-2024-l 539
Parameter Or - Outlet CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Ooeratins Ranse
SERVOMEX
1400
1240-4
25
SERVOMEX
1440
t4t5c-2
20
THERMO
55i
1209s2t50
200
Cylinder ID
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
RR0425 I
cc749479
NA
RR0425t
cc749479
NA
EB007l5 l5
EB007l5 l5
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
10.99
23.02
NA
lt.l
22.93
NA
30.38
30.38
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
9^9t31
vt6t31
NA
9n9/31
Ut613r
NA
U24t2s
v24/25
Tvoe of Samnle Line Heated Samole Line
29 of 45
TECHNICAL Oft(}U}A
Response Times
l
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 25Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
seconds
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO: - Outlet THC - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
30
30
Average 30.0 30.0 30.0
30 of45
P:
AllarrcEr-l E{] rJ rd ! cA; f; ]:]{r l..J ir Calibration Data
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 25Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Date: 413124
Parameter O, - Outlet CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Soan 23.02 22.93 35.00
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hiph
9.21
13.81
9.17
13.76
15.75
19.25
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
28.00
31.50
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero
Mid
Hieh
0.00
r 0.99
23.02
0.00
I 1.10
22.93
0.00
18.00
30.38
Upscale Calibration Gas (C-^)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Mid
Hish
0.20
1t.20
23.00
0.03
10.85
22.90
0.04
18.09
30.36
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Mid
Hish
0.87
0.91
0.09
0. l3
1.09
0. l3
0.00
0.48
0.00
Status
Zero
Mid
Hish
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
3 I of45
AIImrrce
? r{; i"i f* l{.i A,L {} 11 O U i}
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater25Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Parameter O" - Outlet COr - Outlet THC - Outlet
Run I
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
0.20
0.20
l1.04
I1.00
0.03
0.05
10.82
10.86
0.30
0.04
18.09
18.14
Run 2
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
0.20
0.20
I 1.00
I1.04
0.05
0.05
10.86
10.87
0.04
0.04
18.14
18.22
Run 3
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
0.20
0.20
I1.04
I1.00
0.05
0.1 l
r0.87
10.94
0.04
0.04
18.22
18.08
32 of45
NAtlarpe Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins. LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater25Hl
Project No.: AST-2024- I 539
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet THC - Outlet
Run I Date 413124
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
lnitial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
23.02
0.20
I 1.20
0.20
0.20
I1.04
I1.00
22.93
0.03
10.85
0.03
0.05
10.82
10.86
3s.00
0.04
l 8.09
0.30
0.04
18.09
1 8.14
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.00
0.00
-0.70
-0 87
0.00
0.09
-0.13
004
NA
NA
NA
NA
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.17
0.09
0.r7
-0.74
0. l4
Run 2 Date 413124
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretcst System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem IJnscale Resoonse
23.02
0.20
tt.20
0.20
0.20
1 1.00
I 1.04
22.93
0.03
10.85
0.0s
0.0s
10.86
10.87
35.00
0.04
18.09
0.04
0.04
1 8.14
18.22
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.00
0.00
-0.87
-0.70
0.09
0.09
0.04
0.09
NA
NA
NA
NA
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
0. l7
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.23
Run 3 Date 413124
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Ilnscale Resnonse
23.02
0.20
I 1.20
0.20
0.20
I 1.04
11.00
22.93
0.03
10.85
0.05
0.1 I
10.87
10.94
35.00
0.04
18.09
0.04
0.04
t8.22
18.08
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
0.00
0.00
-0.70
-0 87
0.09
0.35
0.09
0.39
NA
NA
NA
NA
)rift (%)
7-ero
\4id
0.00
-0. l7
0.26
0.31
0.00
-0.40
33 of45
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 7'i.107
800-5sl -81 50
PGVP Vendor lO # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
JC 1494 t9
125372
1900 PStG
cc749479.20230103-O
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification 0ates :
)'l1uzo23
11t't6t2n?1
srlreveo()II - I A
)c749479.20230103
u3699/6/
been certified per the May 2O12 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-1 2/531 ,
SMART-CERT
Certified Concentration(s)
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
t0,09 %
t0.05 %
01t18t2023
01t102a23
cc738486 20211012
E800978S7.2021 041 2
19.98 %
1946%
162980025 12t23t2022
017116467 01t17/2023
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the delined specilietions. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are tEceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confldence level of the measurement, unless otheruise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Techniel Gas Seruices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
,,/.**. iJ"n{,
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Versbn 02-J Revised on 2018-09-17
34 of45
le
on*T"***,*
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy way
Shreveport, LA 71'107
800-ssl -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
RR04251
125371
1900 PStG
-{R04251 2023U431-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9121t2023
)9t1Ct?O31
- shreveoon - L-A
tR04251 .2023083 1
1075497'18
has been per the May 201 2 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-1 2/531 ,
Gl.
Certified Concentration(s)
Concentration
lLl "/"
10.99 o/o
Uncertainty
!031 "/,
!0.03 %
Analytical Principle Assayed On
agn1t2o23
09t'1812023
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
FTIR
MPA
Balance
Available Online.
SMART.CERT
Reference Standard(s)
cc737012.20230228 07/0912031
E80022021201A0323 07t15t2026
Analytical lnstrumentation
o2
c02 FTIR
Thermo
MKS
4't 0i
MKS 2031 DJG2EKVSl 3T
1162980025 0911812023
017146467 09t21t2023
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the deflned speciflcations. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% conliden@ level of the measurement, unless olheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reprodued other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technicl Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
., t4 ,
27t,t- * /.)a4i$j
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Ve6ion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
35 of45
ffffies
an Air Liquide company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
63o United Drive
Durham, NC 27713
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number: EO2N199E15A0930
CylinderNumber: E80071515Laboratory: 124 - Durham (SAP) - NC
PGVP Number: 8.22017
Gas Code: PPN,BALN
Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
122-124598794-1
144.4 CF
2015 PS|G
350
Jan 24,2017
Expiration Date: Jan24,2025
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and CertiJication of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require coneclion for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significanl impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sinnafirrp nn file
Do Not Use This below 10O .e.0
Component Requested
Concentration
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Actual ProtocolConcentration Method
Total Relative
Uncertainty
Assay
Dates
PROPANE 3O.OO PPM 30.38 PPM
NITROGEN Balance
G1 +l- 0.7o/o NIST Traceable 0112412017
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot lD Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 16061104 CC482554 50.06 PPM PROPANE/NITROGEN +/- 0.5 Jul 26,2022
lnstrumenUMake/Model
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet 6700 AHR0801333 C3H8 FTIR Jan 05, 2017
Approved for Release
36 of 45
Page 1 of '122-'124598794-1
Almrrce
1 n il rld. ri&i & k*rli fri"&' Ll# Rennins. LLC - west Boutiful. ur
Projci No.:
Date
Analyzer Make:
Analyzer Model :
Analyzer SN:
Environics ID
Component/Balmce Go
Cylinder Gc lD @ilution)
SERVOMEX
Cylinder Go Concentration (Dilution), %i 23.02
Cylinder Gas ID (Mid-Level): RR0425 I
Cylinder Gru Concenration (Mid-Lavel), %. 10.99
o2lN2
AVerate
Anal;rer
Conccotrstion
lnjection I
Error
( +2%t
Injection 2
Error
( +2%t
Injectioo 3
Error
l+2%t
18.35 -o.3%o.tvo o.t%
1.52 0.@/o 4.3%o3%
465 o.q/o o ao/"
))A -o 70/"o to/"o 60/"
37 of 45
Alffince
SOt,,JRCE TESTING
Mass Flow Controller Calibration
Note: The mass flow controller's calibration values are used by the dilution system's operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not
necessarily indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use.
Calibration Performed By Ryan Lyons
Oilution System Make: lEnvironics
Dilution System Model: 14040
Dilution System S/N: 18026
calibration Equipment Make: lAlicatScientific
calibration Equipment Model: lM-10sLPD/5MM-D/5M, M-1sLPM-D/51
CalibrationEquipmentS/N: 1L97206
FlowCellS/N: 1197206
Flow Cell S/N: 1197208
Calibration Gas: lNitrogen
Barometric Pressure, mmHg: 125.5
Ambient Temperature, "F: 167
Mass Flow Controller lD
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
s/N:
fl1
10,000
Environics
4040
4557420L7
*2
10,000
Environics
4040
455242012
#3
1,000
Environics
4040
455238005
set Flow True Flow Diffe.ence
cc/min cc/min
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cc/min cclmin
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cc/min cclmin
5%
L0%
zo%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
too%
500 502 0.4%
1,000 L,oL7 t.7%
2,OOO 2,057 2.9%
3,000 3,083 2.8%
4,000 4,L06 2.7%
5,000 5,122 2.4%
5,000 6,748 2.5%
7,000 7,L64 23%
8,000 8,182 2.3%
9,000 9,198 2.2%
10,000 t0,227 2.2%
500 502 0.4%
1,000 t,oL2 1.2%
2,000 2,0& 2.0%
3,000 3,059 2.O%
4,000 4,078 2.0v.
5,000 5,095 t.9%
5,000 6,tL4 7.9%
7,000 7,t34 7.9%
8,000 8,L52 1.9%
9,000 9,L73 t.9%
10,000 10,195 2.0%
50 49 2.4%
100 99 t5%
200 199 0.7%
300 299 0.2%
400 400 0.7%
500 502 0.s%
500 604 0.6%
700 705 0.9%
800 810 7.3%
900 916 1.8%
1,000 L,o24 2.4%
Date 4127123
38 of45
r\''t: j '/,,
fiffitur
1/ ,,'^.\. s
Red BallTechnical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71'107
800-55't -8't 50
PGVP Vendor lD # Gl 2023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
)c t494 /9
125372
1900 PSI(i
)c749479.20230103-0
Certification Oate:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
J1 l1Al2tJ23
01116t2031
SIIeVeooIt - LA
ic749479.20230103
103499 /til
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPATtaceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-1 2/531 ,
SMART.CERT
ponent Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
22.93%
23.02 o/o
i0.09 %
+0.05 0/o
cct38486.20211012 05/01/2030
E80097897.20210412 0511812030
19.98 0/o
1 9.46 0/o
1162980025 12t23t2022
017146467 01t17t2023
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifl€tions. This
mlibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required Glibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
faclor of k=2 to approximate the 95% conlidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certilicate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Seruices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
. t4 ,,
,/r-- i,)edln7
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Ve6ion 02-J Revised on 2018-09-17
39 of45
-.a'--';.j-,;':-_iffin ^&*rils*
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8'l 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSTS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
iR04251
12537 1
l COO PSt(l
?R04251 20230831-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9t2112023
)9t19t2031
- Shreveoort - LA
.(R04251 .2023083 I
1 0754971 8
as been @rtifled per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol.1.
Certified Concentration(s)
easurement Data Available Online
SMART.CERT
rbon Dioxide
Concentration
1'-r^/"
10.99 %
Uncertainty
t0.11 o/o
10.03 %
Analytical Principle
FTIR
MPA
Assayed On
ogt21t2on
ogt18t2o23
Nitrogen Balance
cc737012 20230228
EAOO22021 .20180323
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifictions. This
clibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are tEceable through National lnstitute of Slandards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration cerlificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Seruices. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into acmunt
when determining pass orfail.
.. tl ,
>+r'v * t;na(-,
t/ "
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-'17
40 of45
HAliarpeTE$i-rNtc&t {tRt}up
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 25Hl
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Date: 4/312024
Traverse Point Time o2
(Y,l
Coz
lo/^\
A-l
2
J
12:59
l3:00
l3:01
4.73
4.65
4.64
4.7
9.30
9.27
9.28
9.3Average
Criteria Met slngle Polnt slngle rolnt
4l of45
42 of 45
25Ht Test Process Data-VOC Testing
Year 2024
Meter: 25-Fl-4172
Description: Fuel Gas flow to 25H1
Units: mscf/h
Notes:
Test Data
Start End
Run 1 413/2024 L3:OO aB/202a8:59
Run 2 4/312024 L4:33 413/2024 t5:32
Run 3 4/3/2024 75:55 4/3/2024 76:54
Testing Process Data
MSCFH
Run 1 L2.44
Run 2 12.38
Run 3 12.35
>90Yo Production Check
Testins Rate 3-Year Max .%
MSCFH . MSCFH of 3-Year Max
Run 1 t2.44 12.80 97.L9%
Run 2 12.38 12.80 96.76%
Run 3 12.35 12.80 96.47%
43 of 45
SamplelD
Sample Date/Tlme
Unit Name
Code Name
Gompleted Date/Time
HYDROGEN-MOL
C6PLUS-I,IOL
co2_MoL
METHANE-MOL
ETHANE-MOL
ETHYLENE.MOL
PROPANE-MOL
CYCLOPROPANE-i'OL
PROPYLENE-I'IOL
ISOBUTANE.MOL
NBUTANE-MOL
PROPADIENE-MOL
ACETYLENE-iiOL
H2S-MOL
T2BUTENE-MOL
ISOPENTANE-MOL
lBUTENE-MOL
ISOBUTENE-MOL
C2BUTENE-iIOL
NPENTANE-iIOL
NITROGEN-MOL
{SBUTADIENE-MOL
T2PENTENE-MOL
co_MoL
2MBUTENE2.MOL
TPENTENE-MOL
C2PENTENE-MOL
NHEXANE-MOL
NHEPTANE-MOL
BENZENE-MOL
CALC_GHV-GAS
CALC-NHV-GAS
CALC-SP-GRAV-GAS
CALC-MW
Total
Argon/Oxygen
Gyclobutane
3MB1
t@7233
alU2O246.oo
Fuel Gas
MIXEDFUELGAS
4ltl2O24t2:32
34.6842
0
0
35.1803
10.5791
4.4894
74.7979
0
0
0.1515
0
0
0
0
0.1236
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LL17.37
1012.54
0.6088
77.5
100
0
0
0
"ffi'ffi'$"T.'
hlAY -1 2024
DIVISION OF AIB OUALITY
44 of 45
45 of45
25H1 VOC
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, 19 & 25A
Source Information
Company Name HF Sinclair
Company Contact:Travis Smith
Contact Phone No.801-299-6625
Stack Designation:25H1
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:4/3/2024 &
Review Date: 5/13/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
VOC NOX CO VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu 0.0054 0.0011
lbs./hr.
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
35.00 6.681 0.9760 1.957 0.84 30.12 -0.02
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8370

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
25H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
HF Sinclair
25H1
Average Emission
Dry VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.0011 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 0.33 10.14 3.72
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry VOC
NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.32E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.272E-07
lbs./hr.0.01 9.88 4.01
ppm corrected for %O2 0.39 9.65 4.02
Run 2
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)5.63E-04 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 5.553E-08
lbs./hr.0.00 10.21 3.66
ppm corrected for %O2 0.17 9.65 3.67 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.44E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.430E-07
lbs./hr.0.01 10.34 3.48
ppm corrected for %O2 0.42 10.16 3.49 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
25H1 VOC
Calibration Error Test
Test Date April 3, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.02
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.87% Passed Cal.
RR04251 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.99 11.20 0.21 0.91% Passed Cal.
CC749479 01/16/31 High-level 23.02 23.00 0.02 0.09% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 47.74%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date April 3, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 22.93
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.131% Passed Cal.
RR04251 09/19/31 Mid-level 11.10 10.85 0.25 1.090% Passed Cal.
CC749479 01/16/31 High-level 22.93 22.90 0.03 0.131% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 48.41%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date April 3, 2024 VOC
CS - Cal. Span 30.38
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.132% Passed Cal.
EB0071515 01/24/25 Mid-level 18.00 18.09 0.09 0.296% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.38 30.36 0.02 0.066% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 59.25%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date NOx
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
25H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 25H1
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.03 0.20
Mid-Level 18.09 10.85 11.20
High-Level 30.36 22.90 23.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 18.09 10.85 11.20
Low-Level 0.13% 0.13% 0.87%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.03 0.2
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.30% 1.09% 0.91%
ppmdv Difference 0.09 0.25 0.21
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.09%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.03 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.30 0.03 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.86% TRUE TRUE 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.26 TRUE TRUE 0 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 18.09 10.82 11.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.13% 0.70%
Difference 0.00 TRUE TRUE 0.03 0.16
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/3/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
1.3 9.7 4.0 CO
4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 42.1% 17.5% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 18.14 10.86 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.16% TRUE TRUE 0.04% 0.87%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.86% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.00% Drift
Difference 0.3 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.16% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.17%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
25H1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.681 30.12 -0.02 30.12 527 9.88 4.01 86.11 29.74 27.89
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 61.4604
0.9760 0.84 31.722 122.80 71 30.979 5.780 0.1572 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.0659 5.130 66,422 2,056 55,977.72 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.003 0.055 500 77 66 615 547 68.8
2 0.003 0.055 516 76 68 515 502 12.6
3 0.004 0.063 520 76 70 352 311 40.8
4 0.005 0.071 521 76 70 496 495 0.6
5 0.007 0.084 525 71 68
6 0.006 0.077 532 76 65
7 0.004 0.063 532 76 65
8 0.003 0.055 533 76 65
9 0.003 0.055 530 71 65
10 0.003 0.055 533 78 65
11 0.004 0.063 533 78 65
12 0.005 0.071 534 79 65
13 0.007 0.084 535 79 65
14 0.006 0.077 533
15 0.005 0.071 530
16 0.003 0.055 530
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
25H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 25H1
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.03 0.20
Mid-Level 18.09 10.85 11.20
High-Level 30.36 22.90 23.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 18.09 10.85 11.20
Low-Level 0.13% 0.13% 0.87%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.03 0.2
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.30% 1.09% 0.91%
ppmdv Difference 0.09 0.25 0.21
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.09%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.03 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.02 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 18.14 10.86 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.16% TRUE TRUE 0.04% 0.87%
Difference 0.05 TRUE TRUE 0.01 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/3/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
0.5 10.0 3.7 CO
1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 43.6% 15.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 18.22 10.87 11.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.43% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.70%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.00% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.26% TRUE TRUE 0.04% 0.17%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
25H1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 30.12 -0.02 30.12 527 10.21 3.66 86.13 29.78 27.78
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 61.4274
0.9760 0.84 33.455 142.10 71 32.691 6.689 0.1699 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.0696 5.43 70,311 2,177 58,368.72 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.003 0.055 515 77 65 571 499 72.1
2 0.004 0.063 522 77 65 524 515 9
3 0.005 0.071 520 77 65 411 352 58.5
4 0.006 0.077 524 77 66 498 496 2.5
5 0.007 0.084 526 77 66
6 0.006 0.077 526 77 65
7 0.005 0.071 527 76 65
8 0.003 0.055 528 76 65
9 0.003 0.055 528 75 65
10 0.004 0.063 526 75 66
11 0.005 0.071 530 75 66
12 0.006 0.077 530 75 65
13 0.007 0.084 531 75 65
14 0.006 0.077 532
15 0.005 0.071 534
16 0.004 0.063 537
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
25H1 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 25H1
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.03 0.20
Mid-Level 18.09 10.85 11.20
High-Level 30.36 22.90 23.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 18.09 10.85 11.20
Low-Level 0.13% 0.13% 0.87%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.03 0.2
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.30% 1.09% 0.91%
ppmv Difference 0.09 0.25 0.21
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.09%
ppmv Difference 0.02 0.03 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.02 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 18.22 10.87 11.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.43% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.70%
Difference 0.13 TRUE TRUE 0.02 0.16
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/3/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
1.3 10.2 3.5 CO
4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 44.3% 15.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.11 0.20 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.35% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 18.08 10.94 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.03% TRUE TRUE 0.39% 0.87%
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.26% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.39% TRUE TRUE 0.31% 0.17%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
25H1 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 30.12 -0.02 30.12 533 10.34 3.48 86.18 29.79 27.55
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 64.4820
0.9760 0.84 28.264 136.80 73 27.482 6.439 0.1898 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.0691 5.43 69,908 2,177 56,637.81 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.003 0.055 510 80 66 641 571 70.4
2 0.005 0.071 515 80 66 536 524 12.4
3 0.006 0.077 521 8l 67 462 411 50.9
4 0.007 0.084 527 8l 67 501 498 3.1
5 0.006 0.077 531 84 67
6 0.005 0.071 533 86 67
7 0.004 0.063 537 88 67
8 0.003 0.055 530 9l 65
9 0.003 0.055 538 9l 65
10 0.003 0.055 540 91 65
11 0.005 0.071 541 9l 65
12 0.006 0.077 538 92 65
13 0.007 0.084 540 9l
14 0.006 0.077 542
15 0.005 0.071 542
16 0.004 0.063 542
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog