DAQ-2024-007976

1

DAQC-451-24
Site ID 10123 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – HOLLY FRONTIER WOODS CROSS REFINERY LLC

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: May 10, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Heater 20H3
Contact: Travis Smith – 801-299-6625
Location: 1070 West 500 South, West Bountiful, Utah 84087
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
FRS ID #: UT0000004901100013
Permit/AO#: Approval Order AN101230057-23 dated November 15, 2023
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report dated May 2, 2024

On May 2, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the Holly Frontier Woods
Cross Refinery LLC, in Davis County, Utah. Testing was performed on April 1, 2024, to demonstrate
compliance with the emission limits found in Approval Order condition II.B.6.d. The DAQ-calculated test
results are:

Source Test Date Test Method Pollutant DAQ Result Tester Result Limit

20H3 4/1/2024 25A VOC 0.0006* 0.0008* 0.0054*

*lbs./MMBtu

DEVIATIONS: No deviations were noted in the test report.

CONCLUSION: Heater 20H3 emissions were within limits at the time of the inspection.
No test deviations were noted.

RECOMMENDATION: Heater 20H3 emissions were within Approval Order emission limits. No
further action required.

HPV: N/A

ATTACHMENTS: Stack test report dated May 2, 2024, and UDAQ spreadsheets

6 , 3
May 2,2024
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Division of Air Quality
Utah Dept. of Environmental Quality
195 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
"**'xI#",
Hand Delivered
f/-U.,-Si,ws"+^-J\
Dustin Simmonds
Vice President and Refinery Manager
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC
1070 W. 500 S, West Bountiful, UT 84087
801 -299-6600 | HFSinclair.com
,.tttF$nclor
"wfrtR5,ffiH,31,
ItrAY '2 -i2-4
t-lan /
DMSION
RE: VOC Performance Test Report - 20H3 Reactor Charge Heater
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining LLC, Davis County
Dear Mr. Bird:
ln accordance with Conditions II.B.l.a and II.B.6.d of Approval Order ANI01230057-23, please find
enclosed the results of our recent VOC emissions testing for process heater 20H3. The testing was
conducted April l, 2024. The test results were 0.00076 lbs/It4MBtu for VOC.
Enclosed, please find a copy of the testing report for process heater 20H3.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at [phone] or email at
ft ravis. smith@hfsinclair. com.
I certify that:
Testing was conducted while the source was operating at the rate and/or conditions specified in the
applicable approval order, operating permit, or federal regulation;
During testing, the source combusted fuels, used raw materials, and maintained process conditions
representative ofnormal operations, and operated under such other relevant conditions specified by the
Director;
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information
contained in the report are true, accurate, and complete.
Sincerely,
1*l}
Enclosure
c: E. Benson (r)File2.4.4
K. Arnold
J. Barton
A. Fresques
Allmre
Source Test Report
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful, UT 84087
Source Tested: Heater 20H3
Test Date: April 1,2024
Project No. AST-2 024-15 39-003
UTAH DEPARTI\4Ef\ff Or:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIry
ffitg#- Bpti,"'"S#r,,
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
au6rce
TECHNICAL GROUP Soarce Tesl Reporl
Test Program Summary
Resulatory Information
Permit No.
Source Information
DAQE-AN101230057-23
Source Name
Refinery Gas Fired Process Heater
Contact Information
Source ID
Heater 20H3
Target Parameter
VOC
Test Location
HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC
1070 West 500 South
West Bountiful, UT 84087
Facility Contacts
Eric Benson
[e-mail]
[phone]
F. Travis Smith
ft ravis. sm [e-mail]
(80t) 299-662s
Test Company
Alliance Technical Goup, LLC
3683 W 22705, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Tobias Hubbard
tobi as. hubbard@al liancetg.com
(60s) 64s-8562
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie.shonk@all iancetg. com
(812) 452-478s
Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
delaine.spangler@all iancetg. com
Report Reviewer
Sarah Perry
sarah.perry @al liancetg. com
lIF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 539-003
2of43
Page i
pdllTarEe
Source Test Repofi
Cer t iJi cat i on St at ementTECHNICAL GNOUF'
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identifred within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer ofthis document.
t' ."
.i.,. / -
, lri I
4124/2024
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 539-003
3 of43
Page ii
pulfripe
Source Test Report
I'able of ContentsTECF]NICAL fiNCUP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ll Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions................. ........................... l-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ......... l-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate..... 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,{ - Oxyger/Carbon Dioxide.......... .......................... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content.......... .................3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l9 - Mass Emission Factors........... ............................ 3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A -Volatile Organic Compounds ... ........................3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,{..........................................3-2
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A ........................................ 3-3
LIST OFTABLES
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- l 539-003
4of43
Page iii
5 of43
pillErrpe
TECHNICAL GROIjP Source Test Report
lntroduction
1.0 Intrcduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC (HF Sinclair)
to conduct compliance testing at the Woods Cross Refinery in West Bountiful, Utah. Portions of the facility are
subject to provisions of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Permit
No. DAQE- AN101230057-23. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of volatile organic compounds
(VOC) from the exhaust of Heater 20H3.
l.l Emission Unit and Control Unit Descriptions
1.2 Project Teem
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-l: ProjectTeam
13 Site Specilic Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by HF Sinclar.
ttr Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT
Unit ID Process Descriotion Air Pollution Controls
20H3 Gas Oil Hydrocracker Charge Heater, 39.7 MMBtu/hr
H[IV, fired on plant gas, natural draft,6 burners (Next
Generation, Ultra Low NOx), and up-fired fumace. Stack
temneratrlre annroximatelv 646oF.
Ultra-low NOx burners
HF Sinclair Personnel F. Travis Smith
Alliance Personnel
Tobias Hubbard
Supilani Mailei
Cael Krahn
AST-2024- I 539-003
6 of43
Page l-1
7 of43
l
Alfu
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Summary of Results
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Woods Cross Refinery in West Bountiful, UT on April 1,2024.
Testing consisted of determining the emission rate of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the exhaust of Heater
20H3.
Table 2-l provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ limits. Any
difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in appendices
is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Rcsults
olatile Organic Compounds Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Concentration, ppmvd @l 5o/o O 2
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Factor, lb/\4MBtu
Permit Limit, lb/]vlMBtu
Percent of Limlt,o/o
0.29
0.16
0.016
0.00055
0.69
0.40
0.038
0.0013
0. l8
0.1I
0.010
0.00036
0.39
0.22
0.022
0.00076
0.00s4
t4
IIF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024- I 539-003
8 of43
Page2-1
9 of43
piltffiipe
TECi-INICAL GNCUP Source Test Repoil
Testing Methodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality confiol data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-l: Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minimum number of traverse points, the upstream and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent diameters and compared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and temperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3.{ - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O) and carbon dioxide (COz) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3,A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content (BWS) was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The
gas conditioning tain consisted of a series of chilled impingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a
known quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravimetrically before and after each test run on
the same balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UT
Full Velocity Traverses
Fuel Facton/Heat Inputs
Volatile Organic Compounds
AST-2024- I 539-003
l0 of43
Page 3- I
pillffirpe
- f il i1 i.'I | ,;; A ,- rj n il '-. :Source T'est Report
7'esting Methodology
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 - Mass Emission Factors
The pollutant concentrations were converted to mass emission factors (lb/MMBtu) using procedures outlined in U.S.
EPA Reference Test Method 19. The calculated fuel factor (F-Factor) from a recent fuel gas analysis was used in the
calculations.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A -Volatile Organic Compounds
The volatile organic compounds (VOC) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method
25A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel
probe, heated Teflon sample line(s) and the identified gas analyzer. The quality conhol measures are described in
Section 3.7.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol | (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5%
absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5Yo (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or0.5%o (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-Level gas
was zero gas, the response was 0.57o or 5.0 percent ofthe upscale gas concentration (whichever was less restrictive).
The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The measurement
system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was within 5.0
percent ofthe Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5%o absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and System
Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5Yo absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5%, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three points (16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line). Each
traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time.
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful. UTAST-2024-l 539-003
I I of43
Page 3-2
pilrffirrce
I li t- l-. i'
Source Test Reprt
Testing Methodology
If the diluent concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.3oh (whichever was less
restrictive) ofthe average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test runs. If
the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than 10 percent or 0.5%o from the
average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in diameter - I 6.7, 50.0
and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter - 0.4, 1.0, and 2.0 meters from the
stack wall). Ifthe pollutant concentration differed by more than l0 percent or 0.5o/o from the average concentration,
then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve ( l2) traverse points. Copies of stratification check data can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 25A
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol | (+l-2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Within two (2) hours prior to testing, zero gas was introduced through the sampling system to the analyzer. After
adjusting the analyzer to the Zero gas concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value
was recorded. This process was repeated for the High-Level gas, and the time required for the analyzer reading to
reach 95 percent of the gas concentration was recorded to determine the response time. Next, Low and Mid-Level
gases were introduced through the sampling system to the analyzer, and the response was recorded when it was
stable. All values were less than +/- 5 percent ofthe calibration gas concentrations.
Mid-Level gas was introduced through the sampling system. After the analyzer response was stable, the value was
recorded. Next, Zero gas was introduced through the sampling system, and the analyzer value recorded once it
reached a stable response. The Analyzer Drift was less than +/- 3 percent of the span value.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance's office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
HF Sinclair - West Bountiful, UTAST-2024-l 539-003
1,2 of 43
Page 3-3
13 of43
Alffirpg
TTCHNiCAL GNO{-,P
Example Calculations
Locetion Htr'Sinclrir Woods Cross Refining, LLC - Wcst Bountiful' UT
Sourcc Heater 20H3
Project No. AST-2024- 1539
Run No. I
Prnreter(s) VFR
Meter Pressure (Pm)' in. Hg
AHPm = Pb*136-
where,
Pb 4= beometnc pressure, in. Hg
AH___.]:l.]L= pressure differential of orifice, in HrO
Pm 25.61 = in. Hg
Absolut. StackC.s Pr.ssure (Ps), in. Hg
Po
Ps = Pb*13_63
whcre,
Pb4=baomefric pressure, in. Hg
Pg -0.28 = static pressure, in. I{2O
Ps 25.5I = in. Hg
Strndrrd Mcter Voluft (VNtd), dscf
I7.636xVmxPmxYv,'sru--lm
shcrc.
Y 0.993 = meter correction factor
u^@=metervolume, cf
Pm 25-61 = absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
t.............fliil= "b$lute meter temperature, oR
vmrd.......ffi=dr"f
Standard Wca Volure (Vwstd), scf
Vsrd=0047l6xVlc
ihere.
Mc 73.1 =weightofH2O@llected,g
v*td---l7a-7-= r"f
Moistur. Fra.tion (BWSsat), dirensionless (theoretic.l at saturatcd conditioN)
,0"'-(ffi)
BWssat
wherc. Ps
Tr ___jryL= sack temperatue, "F
Pt ____211_= Ssolute stack 96 prssure, in. Hg
BWSsat t.000 = dimensionless
Moisturc Frr.tion (BWS), dim$ionl6s
Vwstd
(Vwstd * Vmstd)
?hcrc.
Vstd 3.447 = stddard wet wlume, scf
V6td 32.419 = stildrd meter volume, dscf
ews -6iG-- = dimensionles
Moisture Frscaion (BWS), dimmionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat ( BWSmsd
wharc,
Bwssat 1.000 = rcisrure fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
Bwsmd 0.096 = moisture fraction (measured)Bws.g_
Molecrl.r Weisha (DRY) (Md)' lbnb-mole
y6 = (O.aa xo/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- 0/6COz'o/oO2))
where,
COz 6 0 = carbon dioxide concentration, To
O, __]jj_= oxygen concentration, o%
Md 29.39 = lb/lb mol
14 of43
nllffinr>eTTCilN}CAL {:}ROLJP
Loc{tion HF Sin.lrir Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Example Calculations
Source Herter 20H3
Proje.t No. AST-2024-1539
Run No. I
Par!retcr(s) VFR
Molecnlar Weight (Wf,T) (Ms), lbnb-mle
Ms = Md (L - Bws) + 18.015 (BwS)
where,
Md 29.39 = molecula weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS 0.096 = rcislure fraction, dimensionlsstu.II5-=ttnt*t
Averag. V.lo.ity (Vs), ftlsc
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x 14 P 1/2; avg x
wherc,
Cp 0.84 = pitot tube @effici@t
t P" @- = av.rage pre/post test velocity head of stack go, (in. H2o)t'2
,r E= "verage
pre/post test absolute stack terperaturc, oR
Pt
-1!L=
ubsolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ms 28.30 = moleculd weight of stack gm, lb/lb ml
vrT=ft/r""
Average StackGas Flow rt Str.k Conditions (Q.), scfm
Qa=60xVsxAs
where,
Vr A= ttack 96 velocity, ft /sec
e" to-go = cross-swtional aea ofstack, ft2
Qa 21,260 = acfm
Average StackGas Flow at Stendard Conditims (Qs)' dscfm
Qsd = 17.636 x Qa x (l - BWS) x
Q. L= uverage st&k gas Ilow at stack conditions, acftn
BWS 0.096 = rcislurc fraction, dimensionlcs
,.lE= *solute stack gs pr6sure, in. Hg
Ts _l$!= average pre/post t6t absolute stack temperature, oR
Qs a,244 = dscfin
Dry Crs Meacr Crlibrrtion Check (Yqa)' percent
Yqa
wharc,
Y_9}]_= *eter conection factor, dimensionles
o4=rmtime'min'
V^ _:J4_= total meter volme, dcf
Tm-l!Ll_= absolute meter tempe.ature, oR
AH@ 1.851 =orifice metercalibration coemcis! in. H2O
Pb ___ J:L= buomeric pressure, in. Hg
AH av8 l. I 00 = average pressure differential oforifice, in H2O
Md-?l:L= toleculr weight (DRY)' lb'4b mol
(a H)t"-I:L= average squre
'oot
prosure differential of orifice' (in' H,o)t"
Yqa 0J = percfft
Ec
Ts
x 100
l5 of43
TECH\ICAL GROUP- - Locationi 'ITF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST-2q24:l!!9
Run No. /IVlethod Run I / Method 3A
Oz - Outlet Concentration (Ce), % dry
I':
rl
where,
Co,: (Cou,-Cor- ( fP6;)
Cob, 10.71 = average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co 0.31 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses" %o dry
Cr,1a 10.99 = actual coocentration of calibration g*s,o/o dry
CM I l.l5 : ayeragg ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, %t, dry
Co, 10.55 : Oz Concentration, % dry
Irl
16 of43
L-. l
l
I
l
TECH\ICAL GROUP
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Sourcq Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST.IQ!!{If!
Run No. /Method Run I l Method 3A
COz - Outlet Concentration (C6sJ, 70 dry
Cco,: (Cou,-Co),. ( #-g;)
where,
C*.A: average arialyzervalue duringtest, %dry
C"_ 03 : averagg ofpretest & posttest zero responses,o/o dry
Cr,re I l.l0 : acfual concentration of calibration gas,%o dry
CM I 1.39 : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, %o dry
Cco, 6.04 : CO, Concentration,o/o dry
l7 of43
$tr:AIialpe't
1:f":fit,t*AL {ittr*uf\""L,i.,'"1io'i''nF siiiridilwt6ar Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountitul, UT
Source: Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST-2024- I 539
Run No. /Method Run 1 / Method 25A
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (Crnc), ppmvd
0.096
0.29
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (Crsc*), ppmvw
L tgc* -C1g6x(l-BWS)
where,
cnrc 0.29 = THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
BWS 0.096 : moisture fraction, unitless
Crr.*-il:ppmvw
THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8) (C<THCcl5>), ppmvd @ l5o O,
Cruc x
0.29
where,
Cruc*
BWS
crr.
C<THCcl5>:
where,
Cnrc
co,
CcTHCcl5>
where,
ERrnc =
Crsc
MW
0.26 = THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvw
= moisture fraction, unitless
= ppmvd
= THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
= oxygen concentration, 7o
= ppmvd @15%o Oz
---:- x 1.0E06x454
= THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
= THC molecular weight, g/g-mole
10.55
0.16
THC - Outlet Emission Rate (as C3H8) (ERTHC), lb/hr
0.29
44.1
Qs 8,244 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERruc 0.016 = lb/hr
THC - Outlet Emission Factor (as C3H8) (EFrHca,6), lb/MMBtu
EFrncoa:ER1116xKxFdx / 20.9 \I- I\ 20.9 - Co, /
where,
Crr._p_= THC - Outlet Concentration (as C3H8), ppmvd
K 1.14533E-07 .: constant, lb/dscf' ppmvd
Fo 8ff0 : fuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
Co. 10.55 : oxygen concentration, o%
EFrscoa 0.00055 : lb/MMBtu
MW x Qs x60 r,, x28.32x
l8 of43
19 of43
*dWAIialrce
IECl-,tT'i'CAL GRCilT
Em issions Calculations
Lo.utioo
Source Heater 20H3
Project No. AST-2024-1539
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
4/U24
l8:24
19:23
4nt24 4n124
19:42 20:57
20:46 2l:56
Source Data
Fuel Factor (O2 drv). dscf/MMBtu Fd 8,370 8,370 8,370 8,370
Input Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Flow Rate (Ml-4), dscfm
BWS
Qs
0.096
8,244
0.094
8,083
0.095 0.095
8,072 8,133
Calculated Data - 0utlel
Cz Concentratio n, o/o dry co, 10.55 10.69 10.86 10.70
COz Concentration. 7o drv Cco" 6.04 5.99 5.90 5.98
THC (as CrHs) Concentration, ppmvd
THC (as CrHa) Concentration, ppmvw
THC (as C:Hr) Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 yoO,
THC (as C,H') Emission Rate, lb/hr
THC (as C:Hr) Emission Factor. lbilVlMBtu (O2d)
Crnc
Coc*
CaHc",s
ERtnc
EELr THC O2d
0.29
0.26
0.16
0.016
0.00055
0.69
0.62
0.40
0.038
0.0013
0_ l8 0.39
0.17 0.35
0.1l 0.22
0.010 0.022
0.00036 0.00076
20 of 43
ffi*lh
{ tl{.: l'i r1.l r C A L .} Fl*l-J }
Method 1 Data
hcr.btr HF Sinclrir wood3 Cm3.LLC - We.l Bountltol. UT
tuurce Herte.20HJ
Prej.ct No. AS-2021-1539
Dnte 0l/01/21
Sir.! PrEmr.r.
DEtOdertrtion: Vtrtical
o*t o".is' ---diiiii-
DbtNcfromF.rw.lltoOukideofPod: 65I h
Nippleleng.h: m h
D€pfrofDud: ffi In
Cmls $cllonal Arc. ofDuct: 16.80 ft'
No. of Teil hrl!: Z
Numhr ofRcrdhg! p.r Pott, ----- t-
DLhe Ar 40 0 n
DLhce A Dkt Di.mr.r,, ---- SZ-1-u.r t" ' O.St
otr*" s, ----;6;-n
Dnrffi. B Dud DhmetcB: 8.6 (hu{ bc > 2)
Milmuh Numkr of Tr..-* Potr,
-]l-AtulNunb€.ofT..lersPoints: h
Me.surer (hirhl.nd Drt ),_9El1_
Revtcilcr (hltlsl md Drt.): SPR 4/l
LOCATION OFTMWRSE PONG
Ntnher ofhar.n. poin6 oh d diawtet
I
2
3
J
s
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
{5 6 1 I 9 l0 ll t2
146 - 61 -- 4.4 -- 12 - 2.6 -- 2l
854 .. 250 -- 14.6 -- 105 - 82 -- 67
150 - 296 -- l9.l -- 14.6 -- ll.8, ':.' .t l:: ': ::: .. 111 . )','"
9i 6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 .. li 6
89.5 "- 11 4 -- 61.4. T' iil lil
97 4 -- 88.2
9tl
919
+Percent of strck didn.tet lrcil nBide wall to trtu$e poilil-
Pohi *rll
I
z
3
t
5
6
1
E
I
l0
ll
t2
12
105
t9 4
t:l
611
806
89i
958
178
581
10.11
17.91
11 51
44 73
4967
sl17
il l/{
t5 ll/16
20 3/4
21 t5^6
47 9/16
5{ 3/4
59 I t/t6
6l l/4
Shck Diagam
A=40fi.
B=40ft
ftpthottur = 55.5 in
Cro$ $clioMl tues
Distu.banc€
aaoaaoaa
2l of 43
rulffirrce
Tf,fiiil",,iCAL {1H{}NjP
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinine, LLC - West Bountiful' UT
Source Heater 20H3
Project No. AST-2024-1539
Date 4lll24
Sample Point Angle (AP=0)
t
7
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
t6
Averase
6
6
5
5
4
J
I
0
0
I
I
0
I
J
4
4
2.8
22 of 43
,#<WAlArEe
YXC11 MJCAL GF1 OUP
Field Data
Method 2Data
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - Wcst Bountiful, UT
Source Heater 20H3
Project No. AST-2024-1539
I
4^t24
VALID
l4:08
l5: l7
Pass
2
4/1t24
VALID
t5.47
l6:05
Pass
3
4/1/24
VALID
l6: l0
l6:28
Pass
I
,
3
4
5
6
7
8
BI
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.04
578
579
590
586
588
588
s89
590
567
557
569
587
599
60s
608
643
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.06
005
590
598
600
615
624
620
624
628
6t7
608
622
620
623
619
625
623
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.05
600
610
s89
596
6lt
622
625
623
625
615
6t8
6t2
620
613
620
623
0.244
0.06
0.840
25.53
-0.28
25.51
588.9
1048.6
0.096
1.000
0.096
10.6
6.0
29.39
28.30
2t.l
21,260
547,259
9,121
0.242
0.06
0.840
25.53
-0.27
25.5 I
616.0
1075.7
0.094
1.000
0.094
10.7
6.0
29.39
28.31
21.2
2t,340
535,532
8,926
0.241
0.06
0.840
25.53
-0.25
25.51
613.9
I 073.5
0.095
1.000
0.095
10.9
5.9
29.38
28.29
2r.l
21,291
53s,387
8,923
0.242
0.06
0.840
25.53
-0.2't
25.51
606.3
l 06s.9
0.095
r.000
0.095
10.1
6.0
29.38
28.30
21.1
21,297
slq lq1
8,990
Square Root of AP, (in, WC)r/2 (AP)''
Average AP, in. WC (AP)
Pitot Tube Coeflicient (Cp)
Barometric Pressure, in, Hg (Pb)
Static Pressure, in. WC (Pg)
Stack Pressure, in. Hg (Ps)
Average Temperature, oF (Ts)
Average Temperature, oR (Ts)
MeasuredMoistureFraction (BWSmsd)
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (BWSsat)
Moisture Fraction (BWS)
02 Concentration, To (O2)
CO2 Concentration, 7n (CO2)
rular W€ight, lb/lb-.mole (dry) (Md)
rular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet) (Ms)
Velocity, fUsec (Vs)
VFR at stack conditions, ocfm (Qa)
VFR at standard conditions, sclh (Qsw)
VFR at standard conditions, scfm (Qsw)
23 of43
M
5F.ra:AliatpE)
-T fi{: i-j fl: {}A L {l it *Ui':
Method 4Data
hsrion HF Sincleir woods Cmss Rcfinins, LLC - W$t Boutrtiful, Ul
Source H€aler 20HJ
Pmjccr No. AST-202{-1539
Prrrm(lc(")L
Consle Units / Mcthod ft3 Ml
luo No.
)rtc
itrtus
itr( Time
,nd Time
tun Timc, min (0)
,ct.r ID
I
s/ UzS
VALID
I 8:2.1
t9 24
60
w70l
4t1/21
VALID
19:12
20:t2
0
3
' l/2!
VALID
2:51
2l:51
60
w70l
{etercormtion F.ctor (Y)
)rifice Cslibrrtion V.luc (AH 9)
vlil vrcuum, in. Hg
,n(t Le,k ChdI- flf/min (rt mu vec)
0.993
I,E5 I
2
0 991
1.851
2
0.002
0.993
1.85 I
2
YlctcrVolume, ftJ
0
5
l0
l5
20
2Ss
,5
{0
l5
50
55
60
Iorrl M.terVoltrm€-fi3
878.821
88r..t90
884.540
887.550
890.5i0
893.770
89?.960
m0.130
903.120
906.5r0
909.720
9 I 2.980
916.070
17 7t6
916 {53
919.780
922.1n
925.980
928 970
932 m
935.560
938.2S
941.3q)
9.{.1.5 t0
911.630
950.7{0
953.8{0
17.187
95+.878
957.960
%L0{2
961.t24
967 _206
970.288
973.370
916.t52
9?9 531
982.616
985.698
988 780
991.862
36 98{
5
l0
l5
20
25
3n
35
t0
l5
50
55
60
\rerrge Tempcrdure,'F (Tm)
\rcr.ge Temper.lure, oR (Tm)
trinimum TcmDereturc, of
tr.rimnm T.mn.rature. oF
Metcr
55
51
56
55
56
56
56
56
5i
55
56
55
55
56
5t5
55
Pmhc filtcr Imp. Eri
61
67
68
61
6E
6E
68
68
61
61
61
61
61
67
61
Metcr
61
m
55
5.1
52
53
5l
53
55
55
55
55
55
56
515
52
Prube Filter Imp. Eri
61
68
68
61
61
66
66
66
66
65
65
65
65
66
Mder
55
5
5l
55
5l
56
56
55
5i
55
55
55
5t
5l I
5
Pmbc Filtcr
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
lmp. Eril
61
61
65
66
6
6
65
61
61
6J
66
66
6i
66
61
lammetric Prqsure, in. Hg eb)
{eter Orifice Prclsurc , in. WC (AH)
{eterPr$sure,in. Hg Cn)
25.53
Ilm
25.61
32 419
25.51
t. t00
25.6t
17 5!7
25.i3
t.lm
25.61
lndysi! Typ€
mpitrger I, Prc/Poit Tesl, g
mpinger 2, Prc/Post T6t, g
mpinger 3, Prt/Posr Test, g
mpingerl, Prc/Post Tesl, g
/olumewrter Collected, mL (Vlc)
it.ndard watervolumc, fl ow*d)
{oisture fraction Mcrsured (BWS)
;rsMolsulrrWeighl,lbnb-mole(dry) (Md)
Gnvi
H20
H20
Empty
Silica
51{.8
421.0
3t0.7
460.7
480.9
368.2
-51.1
59.9
57.5
H20
H20
Emps
ffi?
{80.9
368.2
566 0
501.J
s10.9
393.8
578.6
t3.7
.10 0
25.6
H20
H20
Empty
501.1
r70.9
393.8
541.9
116.1
t22 2
31.5
55
28r
1l.t
l.t-I7
0.096
29.39
71.9
3.39t
0.091
29.19
o9
12.6
3.{21
0.095
29 38
24 of43
glIffi]me
Trilil$*r0At* (3tl(}ur
Runl-RMData
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Crcss Refining, LLC - Wesr Bowtiful, UT
Soor.e: Heater 20[B
Project No.:
Date:
Utrcorrcct.d Run Average (C"u)
Crl Grs Concentmaim (CMA)
Prca.sa System Zero Rcspon*
Posttcst System Zero Responsc
Aver8g. Znrc Respon$ (Co)
Pretest Sysacm Crl R$pons
Posttclt Systcm Crl Rcaponsc
Average Cel Reponse (Cs)
Corrccted Run
(}1-Outlea COr-Outlet THC-Oudet
o/"dry '/odry ppf,w
Valid Valid Valid
10.71 6.33
10.99 I l.to
0.31 028
0.3 I 0.30
0.31 0.29
I 1.20 I 1.40
I 1.10 t 1.38
u 15 u39
504
Tim
Urit
0.26
18.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
17.30
t7.t4
t7.22
NA
l8:24
l8:25
l8:26
l8:27
l8:28
l8:29
l8:30
l8:31
t8i32
t8:33
t8:34
l8:35
t8:36
18r37
l8:38
l8:39
l8:40
l8:41
l8:42
l8:43
18r44
l8:45
l8:46
l8:47
l8:48
l8:49
l8:50
l8:51
l8:52
18i53
18i54
l8:5 5
18:56
l8:57
l8:58
l8:59
l9:00
l9i0l
19:02
l9:03
l9:04
l9:05
19i06
l9:07
l9:08
l9:09
l9: l0
19:ll
l9: l2
l9: l3
l9: l4
l9:1 5
l9: l6
l9: l7
l9: l8
l9: l9
19i20
l9:21
19:22
19:23
10.54
r0.57
10.54
10.59
10.59
10.65
10.62
10.69
10.61
10.66
10.68
t0.63
t0.63
10.67
10.70
10.72
t0.67
10.63
10.58
10.63
I0.64
t0.67
10.60
r0.57
10.J6
10.65
10.65
10.63
10.63
10.58
10.63
10.67
10.63
10.65
I0.60
10.64
t0.67
10.69
t0.72
10.80
1o.17
t0.8 I
10.75
10.79
10.69
10.75
to.77
10.84
10.83
t0.97
10.84
10.88
10.81
10.88
10.88
10.99
10.93
I 1.06
I l.l6
I t.00
6.43
6.43
6.U
6.38
6.39
6.35
6.37
6.31
6.40
6.35
6.36
6.31
6.39
6.33
6.33
6.31
6.34
6.37
6.41
6.39
6.18
6.36
6.40
6.42
6.42
6.37
6.35
6.38
6.39
6.41
6.31
6.35
6.17
6.38
6.40
5.38
6.16
6.32
6.31
6.27
6.21
6.26
6.29
6.28
6.34
6.30
6.28
6.26
6.26
6. t8
6.26
6.23
6.26
6.22
6. t8
6.21
6. l4
6.08
518
0.91
0.76
0.69
0.54
0.40
0.36
0.20
0. l0
0. l4
0.1I
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.83
4.93
0.46
0.04
313
25 of 43
Alffirce
TTCIIN ICAI- G ROI",' T
Run2-RMData
Locrtionr IIF Sinclair woods Crcss Refining, LLC'west Bouriful, UT
Sour.e: Heater 20[8
Projcca No.: AST-2024-l
Datc: 4/
Tire
Unit
ot - Outlet
'/" dry
10.8t
10.99
0.31
0.27
0.29
I l.l0
ll lt
10.86
10.79
10.75
10.80
t0.72
10.82
10.73
t0.12
10.80
t0.79
10.79
10.71
10.79
10.73
t0.76
t0.77
10.76
10.76
10.73
10.70
t0.71
10.70
t0.72
t0.72
10.76
10.75
10.65
10.68
r0.50
t0.76
10.t0
10.76
10.78
t0.81
r0.86
10.84
t0.77
10.79
t0.88
10.86
10.92
10.89
r0.92
10.91
10.97
I 1.02
t0.96
10.89
10.91
10.91
t0.92
10.95
t0.97
10.91
10.84
10.84
10.89
10.83
10.81
l0 59
CO, - Outl.t
./o dry
Valid
THC - Outlet
ppNw
Uncor.cctcd Run Avcragc (q6,)
Cal Gss Concentr.tio (CMA)
Prctest Systcm Zero R.spor$
Posttest System Zero R$poE
Average Zero Responsc (Co)
Pretest Systcm Cal Respong
Posttest System Ctl Respons
Averrge Cal Responsc (CM)
6.28 0.62
I l.l0 18.00
0.30 0.04
0.21 0.04
0.29 0.04
I 1.38 17.14
11.39 17.24
I 1.39 17.19
599 NA
6.24
6.28
6.33
6.27
6.31
6.21
6.32
6.32
6.28
6.27
6.27
6.34
6.28
6.32
6.30
6.29
6.ll
6.32
6.33
6.35
6.34
6.36
6.34
6.35
6.31
6.40
6.37
6.43
6.32
6.10
6.33
6.10
6.27
6.25
6.26
6.29
6.28
6.25
6.25
6.20
6.23
6.22
6.22
6. l8
6.17
6. l9
6.22
6.23
6.2t
6.2t
6.23
6. t8
6.2t
6.24
6.24
6.22
6.24
6.26
6.t5
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.M
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
t2.10
12.44
7.62
2.35
0.04
0.04
0.M
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
19:42
19,43
19:44
l9:45
19:46
19147
l9:48
19t49
l9:50
l9:51
l9:52
19r53
t9;54
l9:55
l9:56
l9:57
l9:58
l9:59
20:00
20:01
2Q:02
20:03
20:o4
20r05
20:06
20:07
20:08
20:09
20: l0
20:ll
20:12
20:13
20:14
20: l5
20:16
20.1'l
20: l8
20119
20:20
20:21
20:22
20,23
20:24
20:25
20:26
20:27
20:28
20:29
20:30
20:3 I
20t32
20:33
20.34
20135
20:36
20:42
20:43
20:44
20:45
20146
26 of43
rulffirrce
TTOIIN'CAL SNOUP
Run3-RMData
btrtionr IIF Sinclair Woods Cross Refinins. LLC - West Boutiful, UT
Sourcel Heater 20!13
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Datet 4lll24
fim
Urit
O! - Outlct Col - Oualea THC - Outlci
'/. th;y '/o dt! ppmw
Uncorrected Run Averrgc (qB)
Crl Grs Concentrstim (CMA)
Prctcst System Zero Respotrs
Posttest System Zero RespoNc
Avcrrge Zcro Respons (Co)
Pretest System Csl Respon$
Posttest System Cal Responsc
Average Cal Response (Cy)
20:57
20:58
2O:59
2l:00
21,01
21.02
21.03
2l:04
2l:05
2l:06
2l:07
2l:08
2l:09
2l: l0
2lrll
2l:12
2l:13
2l:14
2lrl5
2l:16
2l:17
2l: l8
2l:19
2l:20
2l:21
2l:22
2l:23
21,24
21t26
2l:27
2l:28
2l:29
2l:30
2l:31
2l:32
2l:33
2l:34
2l:35
2l:36
2l:37
2l:38
2l:39
2l:40
2l:41
2l:42
2l:43
21144
21145
2l:46
2l:47
2l i48
2l:49
2 l:50
2l:51
2t 52
2l:53
21154
2l:55
2l:56
10.99
0.27
0.31
0.29
tt.ll
l l.l4
l l.l3
10.86
It.u
I r.06
t0.9t
I 1.07
It.l I
10.94
10.84
10.75
t0.17
r0.87
I r.03
10.99
10.84
1o.12
10.85
10.93
10.98
10.91
10.9 r
t0.97
I t.l0
t 1.08
10.99
I l.0l
I 1.09
10.96
I 1.04
I 1.00
10.95
10.81
r0.78
tt.26
r l.l2
10.97
I t.03
10.98
I t.08
11.03
I l.0r
tt.l4
t0.92
t0.89
10.86
10.97
I t.04
I 1.04
I 1.07
I 1.03
t0.98
I r.00
I 1.03
10.94
r t.05
I l.l0
|.27
I 1.36
I l.l9
il.04
t r.0l
t0 97
6. l8
I t.l0
0.27
0.30
0.29
I 1.39
I l.16
I 1.38
6.1 I
6. l4
6.23
6.13
6.1 I
6.19
6.26
6.33
6.31
6.15
6. l9
6.27
6.34
6.27
6.22
6.19
6.24
6.77
6.20
6. l3
6. l4
6.18
6.t7
6.t2
6.22
6.14
6.2t
6.22
6.28
6.33
6.03
6.r2
6.21
6.17
6.20
6. t5
6.16
6.18
6ll
6.Zt
6.24
6.25
6.19
6. l5
6. l6
6.t2
6. l8
6. t8
6.tE
6. l6
6.20
6. l4
6.09
6.0t
5.98
6.05
6.15
6.16
6.20
0. l7
r8.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
t7.24
r7.1 5
17.20
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
t.29
0.30
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.M
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
2.23
0.82
0.10
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
27 of43
FP,wAlAlEet u tili*;"? flttr;i# {iohl,o,, Renning, LLC - west Bountiu, ur
Project No.: AST-2024-l 539
FUEL FACTOR CALCULATION BASED ON FUEL ANALYSIS
COMPONEN']MW MOLE%MOLES C MOLES H MOLES O MOLES N MOLES S
HYDROGE}2.016 34.6842 69.368
HELIUN 4.003
METHANE t6.043 35.1 803 35. I 80 t40.721
WATER 18.015
CARBON MONOXIDE 28 010
NITROGEN 28 013
ETHYLENE 28.054 4 4894 8.9'19 17 958
ETHANE 30.070 I 0.579 1 2l 158 63.475
OXYGEN 3r.999
HYDROGEN SULFIDI 34.076
ARGON 39.948
PROPYLENE 42 081
CARBON DIOXIDT 44.0 t 0
PROPANE 44.097 14.7919 44.376 I 18.335
BUTYLENES 56.08 0.1236 0.494 0.989
ISO-BTJTANt 58 24 0.1 515 0.606 1.515
N.BT]TANT 58 24
PENTENES 70 35
ISO-PENTANT 72 5l
N.PENTANt 72 5l
BENZENT 78.t4
HEXANE 86.78
TOLUENE 92 4l
HEPTANE 100.205
ETHYLBENZENE I 06.168
XYLENE 106 168
TOTAL 100.000 I 10.793 412.361
WEIGHT {LBS'I.330.740 415.618
WEIGHTO%76.20t 23.799 0.000 0.000 0.000
LHV BTU/SCF)r 1,004 = SUM [ (MoLE%i . LHV ) = 100 ]
= SUM [ (MOLE%, o HHV,) + IQQ ]
= SUM [ (MOLEo/oi o DENSITY,) + 100 ]
= DENSITY (LBISCF) + DENSITYITn @.0763 LB/SCF)
= HHV + DENSITY
: SUM [ (MOLE%, o lvW i) + 1QQ ]
=1s6 o [(3.64.%H) + (1.53o%C) + (0.14o%N) + (0.57'%S) -(0.46 o%O) ]*GCV
=196 o [(5.57.%H) + (1.53o%C) + (0.14o%N) + (0.57'%S)-(0.46o%Q]+aat/
= lo6 , (0.321 .%C) + GCV
=0.20goFa=F"
HHV (BTU/SCD:1.117.32
DENSITY (LB/SCF)0.046
SPECIFIC GRAVITY 0.603
GCV (BTU/LB):24,278
M\il (LB/LBMOLE)17.464
Fd @SCF/MMBTU)8,370
F* (WSCF/MMBTU)10.262
F"(SCF/MMBTU)r I,008
Expected Fol 1 736
28 of 43
29 of 43
alIffirceTTCHNlCAL GNOUP
QA Data
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source
Project No. AST-2024-1539
Parameter Or - Outlet CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Operating Range
SERVOMEX
1400
1240-4
25
SERVOMEX
t440
t4t5c-2
20
THERMO
55i
120952150
200
Cytinder ID
Zero
Mid
Hieh
NA
RR0425 I
cc749479
NA
RR0425 I
cc749479
NA
E8007 l5 l5
EB0071515
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
10.99
23.02
NA
ll.l
22.93
NA
30.38
30.38
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Mid
Hish
NA
9t1913t
Ut6t31
NA
9n9t3r
Ut613t
NA
v24t25
v24t25
Tvpe of Sample Line Heated Line
30 of43
anffirrceTgSlJNl{}iEL Sft0U n
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining. LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Response Times
seconds
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
30
NA
30
30
NA
i:
30
30
30
Averase 30.0 30.0 30.0
3l of43
plllffirrrce
TECi_I \iCAL GROUP Calibration Data
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Datez 4lll24
Parameter O, - Outlet COz - Outlet THC - Outlet
Exoected Average Concentration
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Span 23.02 22.93 35.00
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hieh
9.21
13.81
9.r7
13.76
t5.75
t9.25
High Range Gas
Low
Hieh
NA
NA
NA
NA
28.00
3 1.50
Actual Concentration (% or pPm)
Zero
Mid
Hiqh
0.00
10.99
23.02
0.00
I l.l0
22.93
0.00
18.00
30.38
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cyo)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Mid
Hieh
0.01
I 1.09
23.00
0.01
10.82
22.92
0.04
17.30
29.69
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Mid
Hish
0.04
0.45
0.09
0.04
1.20
0.04
0.00
-1.71
0.00
Zero
Mid
Hish
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
32 of43
AlffirpeTECi-{\tCAL GHOUP
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST-2024-l 539
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
Run I
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
0.31
0.31
1 1.20
I l.l0
0.28
0.30
I1.40
1 1.38
0.04
0.04
t7.30
17.14
Run 2
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
0.31
0.27
I l.l0
11.11
0.30
0.27
I1.38
I 1.39
0.04
0.04
17.14
17.24
Run 3
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero ResPonse
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
0.27
0.31
ll.ll
I l.14
0.27
0.30
I 1.39
I t.36
0.04
0.04
17.24
17.15
33 of43
Alffirrce
TECI-JNiCAL GftOUi}
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST-2024-1539
Partmeter Or - Outlcl CO, - Outlet THC - Outlet
Run I Dete 4lll24
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.02
0.01
l 1.09
0 31
0 31
I 1.20
I 1.10
22.93
0.01
10 82
028
0.30
I 1.40
l1 38
35.00
0.04
17.30
0.04
0.04
t'7.30
17.14
lias (%)
)retest Zero
losttest Zero
)retest Span
)osttest Snan
130
L30
046
0.03
118
1.26
2.51
242
NA
NA
NA
NA
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.43
0.09
-0.09
0.00
-0.46
Run 2 Date 4lll24
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
23.02
0.01
I1 09
0.31
027
Il l0
ll.ll
22 93
0.01
10.82
0.30
0.27
I 1.38
I 1.39
3s.00
0.04
17.30
004
0.04
1'7.14
17.24
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
130
l. l3
0.03
0.07
t26
l. l3
2.42
2.46
NA
NA
NA
NA
)rift (%)
Zero
\ri.l
-0.17
0.04
-0. l3
0.04
0.00
0.29
Run 3 Date 4nn4
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
23.02
0.01
I 1.09
0.27
0.31
ll.1l
il14
22.93
0.01
10.82
0 2'7
0.30
I 1.39
I 1.36
35.00
004
17.30
0.04
0.04
t7.24
17. l5
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest SDan
l.l l
130
007
0.20
l.t3
t.26
246
2.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0. l7
0. l3
0. l3
-0.13
0.00
-0.26
34 of 43
&**ris*
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # Gl 2023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
)c749479
125372
t900 PStG
)c 749479.202301 03-0
Certification Datel
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certif ication Dates:
)1t18t2023
)'t t16t2031
- shreveDort - LA
)c749479.20230103
I 03899767
),,^; /Jeeitu "'
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
This calibralion standard has been certilied per the I Protocol. Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
G2
SMART.CERT
This is to certify the gases referened have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifi€tions. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement paramete6 to the specified or required caiibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certillcate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
22.93%
23.02%
10.09 %
10.05 %
01t18t2023
o1t1ot2o23
cc1 38486 .2021 101 2
E80097897 .20210412
19.98 %
19 46 0/.
't162980025 1212312022
011146467 0111712023
35 of43
-'i -': i.l- ''-ilffi*':-,--:- .:
a,r,l,,I).,l:.r
&*r"dls*
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 7'1107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G1 2023
EPA PROTOGOL GAS CERTIFIGATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA#
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
RR04251
25371
t900 PStG
?R04251 2023083'1-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certif ication Dates :
)9t21t2023
19t19t2o31
SNIEVEOOII - LA
RR04251 .2023083 1
0/549/lE
has been per tne EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-1 2/53 1,
G1
SMART.CERT
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Reference Standard(s)
cc73701 2 .20230228
e80022021 .20180323
0.112
o 771
Analytical lnstrumentation
o2
co2 FTIR
Thermo
tltKs
41 0i
MKS 2031 DJG2EKVSl 3I
1162980025 0911812023
017146467 09t21t2023
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the deflned specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are tE@able through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lntemational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% mnfidence level of the measurement, unless otheruise noted. This calibration certillcate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
/\ L,l
;7*^- /.)etl-yt/ "'
Jas,ntne Godf,"y
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Ve6ion 02-J. Revised on 2018-09-17
36 of43
ffinrysfls
an Air Liquide company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
63o United Drive
Durham, NC 27713
Airgas.com
CERTIFICATE OF AIVALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number: E02N199E15A0930 Reference Number: 122-124598794-1
Cylinder Number: E80071515 Cylinder Volume: 144.4 CF
Laboratory: 124 - Durham (SAP) - NC Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG
PGVP Number: 822017 Valve Outlet: 350
Gas Code: PPN,BALN Certification Date: Jan24,2O17
Expiration Date: Jan 24,2025
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 201 2)' document EPA
600/R-1 2/531 , using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require conection for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 950/0. There are no signiflcant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sionahrra an file
Do Not Use This below 1 00 i.e
Component Requested
Concentration
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Actual Protocol
Concentration Method
Total Relative
Uncertainty
Assay
Dates
PROPANE 3O.OO PPM 30.38 PPM
NITROGEN Balance
G1 +l- 0.7% NIST Traceable 0112412017
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot lD Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 16061104 CC482554 50.06 PPM PROPANE/NITROGEN +/- 0.5 Jul 26,2O22
lnstrumenUMake/Model
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet 6700 AHR0801333 C3H8 FTIR Jan 05, 2017
Approved for Release
37 of43
Page 1 of 122-124598794-1
AlmrrcEr
1 L {;i' }.} r ilA1* L} ft C)tj r
Location HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
QA Data
Source Heater 20H3
Project No , AST-2024-1539
Parameter(s) VFR
Date Pitot ID Evidence of Evidence of
i!-6tidh Mah+,
Calibration or
Danoi; m-ird
4nt24 Pg-96 no no no
I)ete Probe or
Thermocouple II)
Reference
TemD. (oF)
Indicated Difference Criteria
4^t24 ?e-96 250 0 250.0 0.0o/o + 1.5 % (absolute)
Field Balance Check
Date
Balance ID
Certified Weight ID
Certifi ed Weight Expiration:
Certified weight (g)
Measured Weight (g):
Weight Difference (g):
Date Barometric Pressure Evidence of Reading Verified Calibration or
Ranoir renrirarl,Weether Stetion Location
4/t/24 Weather Station NA NA NA
Date Meter Box ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
4nt24 MB7O4 Pass
38 of43
ffiAliarree DGM Calibration-Orifi ces
Document lI 62A AA4
Revisior 23.0
Effective Dat(t/25/23
lssuing Departmenl Tech Seryices Paq(lof 1
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console D: N/B-704
lveter S/N. 18392989
Critical Orifice S/N: 1330
Calibration Detail
nitial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
:inal Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pbr)
\veraoe Barometric Pressure. in. Ho (Pb)
25.81
25 84
25 86
Critifcal Orifice lD (Y)
K' Factor, ft' R' '/ in. wc min K)
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (Vp)
Initial DGM Volume, ftr 0m,)
Final DGM Volume, ftr (Vmr)
Total DGM volume, ftr (Vm)
1330-31
0.8429
130
143.715
1 54.538
10.823
1330-31 I 330-25
0 6728
150
176.721
185 566
8 839
1330-25 1330-19
0.5'186
16.0
194.998
201.768
6.770
133019
0 8429 0.673 0 519
13.0
154.538
165.187
10.649
15.0
185 566
194123
8.557
16.0
201 768
208.578
6 810
Ambient Temperature, 'F (Ta)
lnitial DGM Temperature, "F (Tm)
Final DGM Temperature, 'F (Tm,
Averaoe DGM Temoerature, "F ( Tm)
66
58
59
59
67
59
61
60
67
62
64
63
68
64
65
65
68
65
66
66
68
66
66
66
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
standard Meter volume, ftr (vmstd)
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (vcr)
N,{eter Correction Factor (Y)
Tolerance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Toler ance
Orifce Cal Check
10.00
3.40
9.6179
9.5051
0 988
0.004
1 881
0 030
10.00
3.40
9.4360
9.4961
1 006
0 014
1 879
0 028
10 00
2.10
7.7587
7 .5797
0 977
0 016
1.805
0.047
10.00
2.10
7.4897
7.5725
'1.011
0 018
1 803
0.048
10.00
130
5 9009
5.8370
0.989
0.004
1.871
0 019
10.00
130
5.9301
5.8370
0.984
0.008
1 869
0.018
1.01 074 1.06
\,leter Correction Factor (Y)0.993
)rifice Calibration Value ( H @)1.851
,ositive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Eouioment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make: ON,lEGA
Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A
Reference Calibrator 5/N : T -197 207
Calibration Detail
Referenae Temo Display Temp Accuracv Difference
ot oR oa F
0
68
100
460
528
560
0
66
98
460
526
558
00
04
04
0
2
2
223
248
273
683
708
133
223
248
274
683
708
734
0.0
0.0
-01
0
0
1
300
400
500
600
704
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1.660
300
399
498
600
702
801
901
1,002
1,102
1.202
760
859
958
1,060
1,162
1,261
1,361
1,462
1,562
1,662
00
0.1
02
00
-02
-01
-01
-0 1
-0.1
-07
0
1
2
0
2
1
1
2
2
2
Personnel
10/30/2023
19 of 43
Calibration By:
Calibration Date:
Reviewed By:
RYAN LYONS
plll6rrtre
TEOHNIUAL GFIOUP
Location: HF Sinclair Woods Cross Refining, LLC - West Bountiful, UT
Source: Heater 20H3
Project No.: AST-2024-l 539
Datet 41112024
Traverse Point Time o2
(ohl
Coz
lo/"\
A-l
2
3
l8:21
18t22
l8:23
10.58
10.52
10.57
10.6
6.42
6.47
6.42
6.4Average
Criteria Met slngle tsolnt Single Point
40 of43
4l of43
Year
Meter:
Description:
Units:
Notes:
20H3 Test Process Data-VOC Testing
2024
20-FC-4003
Fuel Gas flow to 20H3
mscf/d
Test Data
start End
Run 1 417/2024 t8:24 alLl202a19:23
Run 2 41712024 t9:42 4/11202420:46
Run 3 41L12024 20:57 4lt/20242L:56
Testing Process Data
msif/,d
Run 1 561.69
Run 2 s60.99
Run 3 559.20
>909/oProduction Check
Testins Rate 3-Year Max o/o
mscfld mscfld of 3-Year Max
Run 1 s51.69 565.51 99.37%
Run 2 s60.99 s6s.61 99.78%
Run 3 ssg.20 565.61 98.87%
42 of 43
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF
ETWRONMENTAL OUALITY
MAY - 2 i!r?4
DIVISION OF AIR QUALITV
43 of 43
20H3 VOC
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, 19 & 25A
Source Information
Company Name HF Sinclair
Company Contact:Travis Smith
Contact Phone No.801-299-6623
Stack Designation:20H3
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:4/1/2024 &
Review Date: 5/10/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
VOC NOX CO VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu 0.0054 0.0006
lbs./hr.
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
55.50 16.800 0.9930 1.851 0.84 25.53 -0.28
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8370

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
20H3 VOC
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
HF Sinclair
20H3
Average Emission
Dry VOC NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.001 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 0.19 5.98 10.70
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry VOC
NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)4.46E-04 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 2.639E-08
lbs./hr.0.01 6.04 10.54
ppm corrected for %O2 0.13 6.33 10.71
Run 2
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.19E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 6.958E-08
lbs./hr.0.05 6.00 10.69
ppm corrected for %O2 0.35 6.33 10.81 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)2.71E-04 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.554E-08
lbs./hr.0.01 5.90 10.86
ppm corrected for %O2 0.08 6.18 11.00 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 44 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
20H3 VOC
Calibration Error Test
Test Date April 1, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 23.02
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
RR04251 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.99 11.09 0.10 0.43% Passed Cal.
CC749479 01/16/31 High-level 23.02 23.00 0.02 0.09% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 47.74%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date April 1, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 22.93
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.044% Passed Cal.
RR04251 09/19/31 Mid-level 11.10 10.82 0.28 1.221% Passed Cal.
CC749479 01/16/31 High-level 22.93 22.92 0.01 0.044% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 48.41%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date April 1, 2024 VOC
CS - Cal. Span 30.38
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.132% Passed Cal.
EB0071515 01/24/25 Mid-level 18.00 17.30 0.70 2.304% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.38 29.69 0.69 2.271% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 59.25%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date NOx
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
20H3 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 20H3
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.01 0.01
Mid-Level 17.30 10.82 11.09
High-Level 29.69 22.92 23.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 17.30 10.82 11.09
Low-Level 0.13% 0.04% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 2.30% 1.22% 0.43%
ppmdv Difference 0.7 0.28 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 2.27% 0.04% 0.09%
ppmdv Difference 0.69 0.01 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.28 0.31 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 1.18% 1.30%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.27 0.3
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.30 11.40 11.20
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 2.53% 0.48%
Difference 0.00 TRUE TRUE 0.58 0.11
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/1/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
0.3 6.3 10.7 CO
0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 27.6% 46.5% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.30 0.31 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 1.26% 1.30%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.3 0.3
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.14 11.38 11.10
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.53% TRUE TRUE 2.44% 0.04%
Difference 0.2 TRUE TRUE 0.6 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.00% Drift
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.53% TRUE TRUE 0.09% 0.43%
Difference 0.2 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
20H3 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
16.800 25.53 -0.28 25.51 589 6.04 10.54 83.42 29.39 28.29
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 119.1329
0.9930 0.84 37.426 73.10 60 32.186 3.441 0.0966 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.2439 21.120 548,188 21,289 495,244.73 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.05 0.224 578 55 61 461 515 -54.1
2 0.06 0.245 579 51 67 481 421 59.9
3 0.06 0.245 590 56 68 368 311 57.5
4 0.07 0.265 586 55 61 566 556 9.8
5 0.07 0.265 588 56 68
6 0.07 0.265 588 56 68
7 0.07 0.265 589 56 68
8 0.05 0.224 590 56 68
9 0.04 0.200 567 51 61
10 0.04 0.200 557 55 61
11 0.06 0.245 569 56 61
12 0.07 0.265 587 55 61
13 0.07 0.265 599 55 61
14 0.07 0.265 605
15 0.07 0.265 608
16 0.04 0.200 643
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
20H3 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 20H3
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.01 0.01
Mid-Level 17.30 10.82 11.09
High-Level 29.69 22.92 23.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 17.30 10.82 11.09
Low-Level 0.13% 0.04% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 2.30% 1.22% 0.43%
ppmdv Difference 0.7 0.28 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 2.27% 0.04% 0.09%
ppmdv Difference 0.69 0.01 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.30 0.31 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 1.26% 1.30%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.29 0.3
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.14 11.38 11.10
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.53% TRUE TRUE 2.44% 0.04%
Difference 0.16 TRUE TRUE 0.56 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/1/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
0.6 6.3 10.8 CO
2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.4% 47.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.27 0.27 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 1.13% 1.13%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.3 0.3
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.24 11.39 11.11
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.20% TRUE TRUE 2.49% 0.09%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.6 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.13% 0.17% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.33% TRUE TRUE 0.04% 0.04%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
20H3 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
16.80 25.53 -0.28 25.51 616 6.00 10.69 83.31 29.39 28.31
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 145.2963
0.9930 0.84 37.387 71.90 60 32.155 3.384 0.0952 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.3676 32.22 815,265 32,478 737,629.16 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.05 0.224 590 61 61 504 461 43.7
2 0.05 0.224 598 60 68 471 481 -10
3 0.06 0.245 600 55 68 394 368 25.6
4 0.06 0.245 615 54 61 579 566 12.6
5 0.07 0.265 624 52 61
6 0.08 0.283 620 53 66
7 0.05 0.224 624 53 66
8 0.05 0.224 628 53 66
9 0.05 0.224 617 55 66
10 0.05 0.224 608 55 65
11 0.06 0.245 622 55 65
12 0.06 0.245 620 55 65
13 0.06 0.245 623 55 65
14 0.08 0.283 619
15 0.06 0.245 625
16 5.00 2.236 623
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
20H3 VOC
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
HF Sinclair
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 20H3
CS Calibration Span 30.38 22.93 23.02
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value: VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 18.00 11.10 10.99
High-Level 30.38 22.93 23.02
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 59.2% 48.4% 47.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 18.00 11.10 10.99
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.04 0.01 0.01
Mid-Level 17.30 10.82 11.09
High-Level 29.69 22.92 23.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 17.30 10.82 11.09
Low-Level 0.13% 0.04% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 2.30% 1.22% 0.43%
ppmv Difference 0.7 0.28 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 2.27% 0.04% 0.09%
ppmv Difference 0.69 0.01 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.27 0.27 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 1.13% 1.13%± 5% of Span
Difference 0 TRUE TRUE 0.26 0.26
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.24 11.39 11.11
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.20% TRUE TRUE 2.49% 0.09%
Difference 0.06 TRUE TRUE 0.57 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:4/1/2024 VOC
VOC NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
0.2 6.2 11.0 CO
0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 27.0% 47.8% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values VOC NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.30 0.31 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias 0.00% TRUE TRUE 1.26% 1.30%± 5% of Span
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.3 0.3
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 17.15 11.36 11.14
SBi - Up-Scale Bias 0.49% TRUE TRUE 2.35% 0.22%
Difference 0.2 TRUE TRUE 0.5 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift 0.00% TRUE TRUE 0.13% 0.17% Response Spec.
Difference 0.0 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift 0.30% TRUE TRUE 0.13% 0.13%
Difference 0.1 TRUE TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
20H3 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
16.80 25.53 -0.28 25.51 614 5.90 10.86 83.24 29.38 28.27
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 143.1041
0.9930 0.84 36.984 72.60 61 31.775 3.417 0.0971 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.2414 21.15 536,219 21,319 484,150.45 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.04 0.200 600 55 67 542 504 37.5
2 0.05 0.224 610 55 67 476 471 5.5
3 0.06 0.245 589 55 65 422 394 28.4
4 0.06 0.245 596 54 66 580 579 1.2
5 0.07 0.265 611 55 66
6 0.08 0.283 622 54 66
7 0.06 0.245 625 56 65
8 0.04 0.200 623 56 67
9 0.05 0.224 625 55 67
10 0.05 0.224 615 55 65
11 0.06 0.245 618 55 66
12 0.06 0.245 612 55 66
13 0.07 0.265 620 55 65
14 0.08 0.283 613
15 0.06 0.245 620
16 0.05 0.224 623
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog