DSHW-2003-011508 - 0901a06880a872f7

{3bp HECEIVET
.L/YP1r/tD
, -,,_ :r,H Jd#H,h_ _,,,,lrh itcntrlnrpnl nl Enuirnnmonhi Orr:rlr
2OO2 Annual Report
EPA ID No. UTDOO82637O
BP Closed Hazardous Waste
Management Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah
Prepared by:
The RETEC Group, lnc.
175 West 200 South Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1456
RETEC Project Number: AMO72-16375-727
Prepared for:
BP Products North America lnc.
801 Warrenville Road, Suite 800
Lisle, lllinois 60532
Apri! 15, 2003
o
2002Annual Report
BP Closed Hazardous Waste
Management Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah
Prepared by:
The RETEC Group, tnc.
175 West 200 South Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 94101-1456
RETEC Project Number: AMOTZ-1ililIS_TZT
Prepared for:
BP Products North America tnc.
801 Warrenville Road, Suite 900
Lisle, lllinois G0S32
Prepared by:
futr&;*
Clint F. Gale, EnvironmentatScientist, RETEC
I Business Manager, BP
April 15, 2003
I:\BP - ClMMFV002\Reports\02Annual\Ann2002rpt.doc
Table of Gontents
6
7
8
Introduction................ ............ l-l1.1 Purpose..... ..................1-l1.2 Scope........ ..................l-l1.3 Site Location and Background................ .......1-11.4 Environmental Setting .................1-2
1.4.1 Geology and Hydrogeology..... ..........1-2
1.4.2 Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations.. ..........1-3
Summary of 2002 Site Activities............ ...................2-l2.1 Quarterly Inspections ...................2-l
2.1.1 Quarterly Site Security Inspections............. ........2-I
2.1 .2 Quarterly Cover and Evaporation Pond Area Inspections ..... 2- 12.2 Annual Monitoring Well Testing................ ...2-22.2.1 Annual Well Integrity Tests.. .............2-2
2.2.2 Annual Well Sediment Accumulation Inspection......... ......... 2-22.3 Annual Site Training............... .....2-32.4 2002 Construction and Maintenance Activities................ .................2-3
Groundwater Monitoring ............. ............ 3-13.1 Groundwater Flow Evaluation .....3-l3.2 Analysis of Groundwater Sampling Results... .....,............3-2
3.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedures.............. .......3-2
3.2.2 Analytical Data Quality Assurance/euality Control ............. 3 -3
3.2.3 QA/QC Results and Evaluation of Data Usability.................3-3
3.2.4 Post-Closure Groundwater Monitoring Results.....................3-3
3.2.4.1 Nine VOCs in CHWMF Monitoring Wells............3-4
3.2.4.2 Dissolved Chromium in Monitoring Wells... .......... 3 -4
3.2.5 Evaluation of 2002 Groundwater Monitoring Data.... ...........3-4
Conclusions................ ............4-l4.1 Post-Closure lnspections and Maintenance Activities .....4-l4.2 Groundwater Monitoring............ ...................4-l
Anticipated 2003 Post-Closure Activities.. ................5-l5.1 2003 Post-Closure Operations Staff.......... .....5-l5.2 Post-Closure Operations and Maintenance........ ..............5-25.3 Post-Closure Permit Modification............... ....................5-2
Post-Closure Cost Estimation ..................6-1
References ............7 -l
Certification Statement ..........8-1
AMO72-16375-727
List of Tables
Table I Monitoring Well Construction Detail and Sampling Rationale
Table2 Chronological Summary of 2002 Activities and Correspondence
Table 3 2002 Water Elevation Data
Table 4 2002 Groundwater Field Parameter Results
Table 5 2002 Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 6 2002 Post-Closure Cost Estimate
AMO72-16375-727
List of Figures
Figure I Site Location Map
Figure 2 CHWMF Monitoring Well Location Map
Figure 3 Shallow Water Table Elevation Contour Map - April2002
Figure 4 Shallow Water Table Elevation Contour Map - September 2002
AMO72-16375-727 lll
List of Appendices
Appendix A 2002 Conespondence
Appendix B 2002 InspectionReports, Field Sampling Logs and Chain of Custodies
Appendix C 2}02Trairung Documentation
Appendix D 2002 Grotrndwater Analytical Data and Data Validation Reports
ulAMO72-1637s-727
1 Introduction
This 2002 annual report describes the post-closure cile and groundwater
monitoring activities for the Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility
(CHWMF) located in Salt Lake City, Utah. The RETEC Group, Inc,
(RETEC) has been retained by BP Products North America Inc. (BP) to
supervise groundwater monitoring activities, review and summarize analytical
data, and prepare reports describing post-closure care activities, results, and
conclusions.
In accordance with approved operations and maintenance inspection reporting
requirements presented in the Closure/Post-Closure Plan, this report
summarizes 2002 post-closure construction, maintenance, and monitoring
activities completed at the CHWMF. Routine post-closure operations and
maintenance inspections are sunmarized in Section 2. Groundwater
monitoring activities are sunmarizedin Section 3. Conclusions are stated in
Section 4. Anticipated 2003 post-closure activities are summarized in Section
5. The annual post-closure cost estimate is presented in Section 6. Section 7
provides a list of references cited in this document and the BP certification
page is provided in Section 8.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this report is to provide a summary and evaluation of data
collected during post-closure groundwater monitoring for the period
January l, 2002, through December 31, 2002, at the CHWMF. In addition,
this report summarizes inspections, routine maintenance, ffiy emergency
response, and any regulatory activities between BP and the Utah Department
of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) in2002.
1.2 Scope
The scope of this report includes the following reporting requirements:
. Summary of regulatory activity and correspondence for 2002. Summary of 2002 post-closure groundwater monitoring activities. Summary of groundwater elevations and flow directions. Summary of grourdwater sampling and analytical data. Conclusions
1.3 Site Location and Background
The BP CHWMF is located immediately north of Rosewood Park in Salt Lake
City, Utah at about 1300 North Boy Scout Drive (1200 West) as shown on
Figure 1. The CHWMF is a former refinery waste containment facility that
consisted of four surface impoundments and two evaporation pond areas.
AMO72-1637s-727 1-l
2002 Annual Report - BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility - Salt Lake City, W
Amoco Oil Company (Amoco) constructed the waste containment facility to
receive API separator sludges and lime blowdown solids from the former
Amoco Salt Lake city Refinery (now Tesoro Refinery) in 1964. The wastes
were pumped to the CHWMF as a slurry though a buried pipeline.
In accordance with plans approved by the utah Bureau of solid and
Hazardous waste (uBSHw) on November 6, 1986, and detailed in the
closure/Post-closure Plan (Dames & Moore, 1986), the GHWMF underwent
closure in four stages during the period between 1986 through 1991. These
stages included: 1) standing liquid removal, 2) slurry wall and drain
construction, 3) sludge stabilization, and 4) surface impoundment cap
construction. Upon completion of Stage 4 construction activities in June
1991, the cHwMF underwent a transition to post-closure period
administration. This transition was officially made on July 29,1991.
The post-closure period extends to 30 years after closure certification, thus
terminating in the year 2021. The current Post-Closure Permit was renewed
in 1997 and is valid for 10 years. ln 2002, UDEQ requested that Bp update
and revise the GHWMF Post-Closure Care and Monitoring Plan and the post-
closure Permit to reflect site ownership name change and document
repository location change. These revised documents are being reviewed by
BP and will be submitted to UDEQ during the second quarter of 2003.
were
Great
1.4 Environmental Setting
1.4.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
Geologic units in the near vicinity of the CHWMF consist of Holocene deltaic
stream deposits interfingered with lake sediments. Sediments at depth may
have been formed during high stages of Lake Bonneville, the fresh water
predecessor to the Great salt Lake, whereas the near-surface soils
probably deposited in saline and alkaline water representative of the
Salt Lake.
on a regional scale, there is a well-defined two-aquifer system as described by
Hely, et.al. (1971). The uppermost aquifer is referred to as the shallow
aquifer and is generally present from near the land surface down to depths of
50 feet below the surface. The shallow and deep aquifers are separated by a
silty clay aquitard of variable thickness, from 20 to 100 feet. The deep aquifer
is comprised of interbedded sands, gravels, silts, and clays of lacustrine origin.
The deep aquifer is recharged primarily along the mountain front where the
aquitard unit is absent. The deep aquifer contains water under pressure, since
its main recharge source is higher elevation than the general valley floor. The
general flow of groundwater across the site is westward toward the Jordan
River.
AMO72-16375-727 t-2
2002 Annual Report - BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility - Salt Lake City, UT
1.4.2 Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations
A total of 30 groundwater monitoring wells are monitored semi-annually
the well locations listed in Table l. The locations of the wells are shown
Figure 2.
Three types of monitoring wells, plus a stream gauge in the adjacent Drain
Canal, are used to measure water levels:
1.Deep monitoring wells (RD-series wells) are used to monitor pressures
at depths of approximately 100 feet below ground surface.
Intermediate wells (TN-B and TN-C series wells) are used to monitor
pressures at depths of approximately 35-40 and 55-60 feet below
ground surface.
Shallow monitoring wells (TN-A series, S-series and WQ-series wells)
are used to monitor pressures in the uppermost portion of the aquifer,
generally within 20-25 feet of the ground surface.
4. Stream gauge SG-2 is used to monitor surface levels in the Drain
Canal since the Drain Canal is interconnected with and influences
groundwater flow in the shallow aquifer.
at
in
2.
J.
AMO72-t6i75-727 1-3
2 Summary of 2002 Site Activities
Annual, semi-annual, and quarterly tests, monitoring, and inspections were
completed in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section 4.5 and
Appendix F of the Closure/Post-Closure Plan and subsequent modifications.
The inspections were performed to ensure the integrity and proper functioning
of the groundwater containment system. Annual and quarterly testing and
inspection activities are described in this section. Semi-annual monitoring
consisting of groundwater level measurements and analysis of groundwater
samples are described in Section 3. Table 2 summarizes a chronologicallisting of site activities, including correspondence, during 2002.
Correspondence is documented in Appendix A.
Operations and maintenance inspections completed during 2002 included:
l. Arurual Monitoring Well Integrity Tests
2. Annual Well Sediment Accumulation Inspection
3. Annual Site Training
4. Quarterly Site Security Inspections
5. Quarterly Cover and Evaporation Pond Area Inspections
6. Semi-Annual Groundwater Level Monitoring
7. Semi-annual Groundwater Quality Monitoring
2.1 Quarterly Inspections
Quarterly inspections included security inspections and cover and evaporation
pond area inspections. Completed inspection forms ate provided in
Appendix B.
2.1.1 Quarterly Site Security lnspections
Evaluations of site security involved inspection of the integrity of the
perimeter security fence, locks, and warning signs. Warning signs were
readable and positioned every 300 feet along the security fence.
2.1.2 Quarterly Cover and Evaporation Pond Area
lnspections
Inspections of the CHWMF cover are completed to ensure that the integrity of
the clay layer covering the stabilized waste material is not compromised.
Inspection of the physical condition of the vented riser pipes is also included
in these inspections. Inspections of the closed evaporation pond area are
completed to ensure that the area drains are functioning as designed and that
standing water is minimized.
No evidence of cover erosion was noticed on the CHWMF cover during 2002
and the integrity of the clay cover was intact. Burrowing animal activity was
AMO72-16375-727 2-1
2002 Annual Report - BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility - Salt Lake City, UT
evident in 2002, as it has been in previous years. However, burrows did not
indicate the presence of large burrowing animals. Burrowing animal activity
appearc to be limited to small rodents. Based on material in mounds and
excavations, burrows appear to be restricted to the shallow topsoil horizon and
do not appear to penetrate the clay cap, and consequently do not appear to
pose any potential for exposing buried waste.
The physical condition of the vented riser pipes, which are used to vent the
covered and stabilized waste material, was evaluated during the 2002
inspections. No cracks or damage of any kind were noted.
No standing water in the evaporation pond area was noted during 2002 and
drainage pipes were not blocked.
2.2 Annual Monitoring Well Testing
Annual well integrity testing and sediment accumulation inspections were
performed on September 4, 2002, prior to the second semi-annual
groundwater monitoring event. Visual inspections of the monitoring well
surface seals were performed during both the March and September 2002
groundwater monitoring events.
2.2.1 Annual Well lntegrity Tests
As a measure of proper well screen function, well response tests were
conducted on all applicable 2-inch diameter groundwater monitoring wells.
Response tests were performed by removing 0.5 gallons of water from each
well and measuring water level recovery at convenient time intervals. Well
response is considered adequate if the water level returns to within four inches
of the initial water level measurement within eight hours following water
removal. All wells passed the response criteria in a time much shorter than
required. Well response test documentation is provided in Appendix B.
All regularly monitored wells are evaluated annually to confirm proper well
function. The integrity of these wells is evaluated based on a visual inspection
of well surface seals and on well response tests. If visual examination of any
surface seal shows evidence of cracking, then further tests are conducted to
determine if a proper seal is maintained. All well seals passed the visual
inspection and the response criteria during the2002 sampling events.
2.2.2 Annual Wel! Sediment Accumulation Inspection
CHWMF wells were inspected for sediment accumulation in September 2002.
No well exceeded the maximum allowable sediment thickness of 2 feet.
Sediment thicknesses were generally less than 0.5 feet. Sediment
accumulation measurements are included in Appendix B.
AMO72-16375-727 aa
2002 Annual Report - BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility - Salt Lake City, UT
2.3 Annual Site Training
Classroom training for personnel assigned duties at the CHWMF is required
prior to any field activities. The training consisted of verbal review and
instruction on groundwater monitoring requirements, inspection and reporting
requirements, maintenance requirements, the CHWMF contingency plan, site
security, and health and safety requirements. The training event is
documented on a single form included in Appendix C.
2.4 2002 Gonstruction and Maintenance
Activities
No construction and maintenance activities were necessary during 2002
AMO72-1637s-727 2-3
3 Groundwater Monitoring
Groundwater monitoring activities conducted during the semi-annual
sampling events in 2002 included measuring groundwater levels in 30
monitoring wells and collecting samples from six monitoring wells.
3.1 Groundwater Flow Evaluation
Monitoring of groundwater levels in the CHWMF wells was conducted semi-
annually during 2002. The water level monitoring program is designed to
provide a means of evaluating the continued effectiveness of the containment
system, and to determine groundwater flow directions at the site. This
included monitoring of 27 exteior compliance wells (WQ and TN series) and
three wells (S-31, S-32, and S-33) located within the containment system.
Table 1 presents monitoring well construction data and sampling rationale.
Groundwater elevation data for March and September 2002 is presented in
Table 3. Monitoring well locations and contour maps of the shallow aquifer
for March and September 2002 are included as Figures 3 and 4, respectively.
As shown on Figures 3 and 4, groundwater flow directions are generally
toward the west, toward the Oil Drain Canal. Water levels within the
containment system appear to be relatively "perched", with interior wells
(S-31, S-32, and S-33) showing very similar groundwater elevations.
Comparison of exterior wells (WQ- series wells) with interior wells provides
an opportunity to monitor the recovery of water levels inside the containment
system after the groundwater collection pump was tumed off. Groundwater
elevations in the interior monitoring wells have increased about 6.75 feet since
the sump pump system was turned off on January 8, 1997. On the west side
of the containment system (near wells WQ-l and WQ-2) groundwater
elevations observed at interior wells are an average of 1.2 feet higher than
water elevations outside of the containment system. On the north side of the
containment system at wells wQ-3 and WQ-4, water elevations were similar
on both sides of the containment system during the March and September
2002 events. At WQ-5, water levels were consistently higher than interior
wells (1.42 feet higher in March and 0.99 feet higher in September). The
extremely low hydraulic gradient and difference in elevations between interior
and exterior wells indicate that the containment system is functioning
effectively.
Groundwater elevation data indicate that an upward groundwater gradient is
maintained near the containment system. Wells that are completed in the
deeper portion of the aquifer (TN-C series) have groundwater elevations that
are on average 2 feet higher than the wells completed in the shallow portion of
the aquifer (TN-A series). Intermediate depth wells (TN-B series) wells have
groundwater elevations that are 0.8 ft higher than shallow wells (TN-A
series).
AMO72-t6i7s-727 3-l
2002 Annual Report - BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility - Salt Lake City, UT
3.2 Analysis of Groundwater Sampling Results
This section describes the analytical dat"a for groundwater samples collected in
2002.
3.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedures
Post-Closure groundwater quality monitoring was completed during March
and September 2002. Sampling was completed by RETEC personnel in
accordance with specifications detailed in Volume 4, Appendix G of the
approved Closure/Post Closure permit application, and in Module V, Part D of
the Hazardous Waste Post-Closure Plan Approval, and subsequent
mpdifications.
Compliance monitoring wells WQ-l through WQ-5 and upgradient well 5-16
were sampled during the monitoring events (Table 1). As specified in the
approved Sampling and Analysis Plan and subsequent modifications, depth-
to-water and total depth measurements were recorded, and then the wells were
evacuated until a minimum of three casing and sand-pack volumes were
purged from each well and stable temperature, pH, and specific conductance
measurements were achieved. The wells were evacuated using a Grundfos
submersible pump.
The Grundfos pump consisted of a submersible stainless steel pump body and
associated discharge tubing. The pump and tubing were decontaminated
between wells by pumping distilled water through the pump and tubing until
the specific conductance of the decontamination water was less than or equal
to 50 pS/cm. Temperature, pH, and specific conductance measurements were
recorded after evacuation of each purge volume. Final field parameters for
each well are summarizedin Table 4.
Upon stabilization of field parameters, wells were sampled according to
approved plan procedures. Samples were collected from wells purged with
the submersible pump using a disposable HDPE bailer. The water samples for
dissolved chromium analysis were collected by pumping water out of the
bailer and through a 0.45 micron filter using a peristaltic pump.
After collection, individual samples were placed on ice and stored in a cooler.
Upon completion of the sampling program, a chain of custody form was
completed and the samples were delivered directly to Mountain States
Analytical Laboratory (MSAL) in Salt Lake City, Utah. All samples collected
were analyzed in the laboratory for dissolved chromium and nine volatile
organic constituents (VOCs). Volatile organic constituents included:
. 1,1 Dichloroethane. 1,1 Dichloroetheneo Chloroform
AMO72-16i75-727 3-Z
2002 Annual - BP Closed Hazardous Waste
. 1,1, Trichloroethaneo Carbon Tetrachlorideo Benzene
. Toluene. Ethylbenzene
. Xylenes (total)
- Salt Lake Citv. UT
3.2.2 Analytical Data Quality Assurance/euality
Control
In accordance with the Post-closure care and Monitoring plan, quality
control and quality assurance (QA/QC) of laboratory datais provided through
the analysis of method blanks, laboratory control/laboratory control duplicate
samples, matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate samples, and blind duplicate
samples. One blind duplicate sample was collected during each semi-annual
sampling event in 2002. Blind duplicate samples are given fictitious names
and collection times and submitted along with the original source samples to
MSAL for analysis. Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate samples are prepared
at the laboratory; however, the collection of an exfia volume of water is
required. one equipment blank was also collected during each 2002 semi-
annual sampling event.
3.2.3 QA/QG Results and Evaluation of Data Usability
The results of the QA/QC audit for the 2002 analytical data are included in
Appendix D. The audit found that the 2002 morutoring program data meet the
Data Quality Objectives defined in the Post-Closure Care and Monitoring Plan
and are acceptable. However, chloroform was detected in the September
equipment blank at 0.63 mg/I. Because chloroform was also detected in the
method blank, chloroform in the September equipment blank was qualified as
"undetected at the reported concentration; result is considered to be a false
positive".
3.2.4 Post-Glosure Groundwater Monitoring Resurts
Semi-annual groundwater sampling was performed on April l-2 and
September 5-6,2002, in accordance Sampling and Analysis Plan and the Post-
Closure Care and Monitoring Plan. Table 5 is a sunmary of analytical results
for the CHWMF groundwater monitoring progrrlm for the 2002 semi-annual
sampling events. The 2002 laboratory analytical reports are included in
Appendix D. Field notes recorded during the semi-annual sampling events in
2002 arc included in Appendix B.
AMO72-16375-727 J-J
2002 Annual Report - BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility - Salt Lake City, UT
3.2.4.1 Nine VOCs in CHWMF Monitoring Wells
The VOCs 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene, chloroform, l,l,-
trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and
xylenes were not reported above the reporting limit of 5 pgll in any of the
groundwater samples collected from the CHWMF during the 2002 semi-
annual sampling events.
3.2.4.2 Dissolved Chromium in CHWMF Monitoring Wells
Dissolved chromium was not reported above the reporting limit of
0.05 mg/l in any of the groundwater samples collected from the CHWMF
during the2002 semi-annual sampling events.
3.2.5 Evaluation of 2002 Groundwater Monitoring Data
Analytical results from semi-annual groundwater quality monitoring were
reviewed to determine compliance with groundwater protection standards
presented in the 1997 revision of the Post-Closure Care and Monitoring Plan
(TriTechnics, 1997).
Since both the March and September 20021aboratory analytical data for all
groundwater quality samples were below detection limits for volatile organic
constituents and dissolved chromium, water quality monitoring demonstrates
compliance with the approved standards.
aMo72-1637s-727 3-4
4 Gonclusions
The following conclusions can be made based on the activities and results of
the2002 post-closure inspection program and groundwater monitoring events.
4,1 Post-Closure lnspections and Maintenance
Activities
o Quarterly inspections of the CHWMF were performed in March, June,
September, and December 2002. Quarterly inspections included the
cover of the closed surface impoundment, the physical condition of the
vented riser pipes, evaporation pond area drainage, and site security
systems. No evidence of cover erosion was noted. Burrowing animal
activity was limited to small rodents and did not appear to penetrate
the clay cap. No other problems were noted n2002.
o Annual inspections of the CHWMF were performed in September
2002. Well integrity tests indicated that all wells continue to function
effectively. Sediment thicknesses measured in wells were generally
less than 0.5 feet.
4.2 Groundwater Monitoring
Water levels were measured at the site in March and September
2002. Groundwater contour maps (Figures 3 and 4) indicate that
groundwater flow directions are consistent with previously
reported trends.
Groundwater samples were collected in March and September
2002. Samples were collected from five compliance wells (WQ-
series wells) and one upgradient well (5-16). Volatile organic
compounds and chromium were not detected in any of the
groundwater samples for either event.
The results of the QA/QC audit for the 2002 analytical data indicated
that the 2002 monitoring program data meet the Data Quality
Objectives defined in the Sampling and Analysis Plan.
AMO72-16375-727 4-l
5 Anticipated 2003 Post-Closure
Activities
5.1 2003 Post-CIosure Operations Staff
The Closure/Post-Closure permit requires that the Facility Coordinator,
Facility Inspector, and altemates each be identified, and that they each receive
annual classroom training. The staff currently responsible for the 2003
Closure/Post-Closure CHWMF operations and maintenance is as follows:
Telenhone
Title Name and Address Business IIome
Facility
Coordinator
Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group, Inc.
4150 South 1400 East
Salt Lake City, Utah
84124
801-359-3059 80t424-1184
Alternate
Facility
Coordinator
KunAlloway
The RETEC Group, Inc.
2089F,. Pine Canyon
Lincoln, Utah84074
801-359-30s9 801-550-4674
Facility
Inspector
Marcy Christlieb
The RETEC Group, lnc.
I l0 South 800 East #207
Salt Lake City, Utah
84102
801-359-3059 801-641-92s3
Alternate
Facility
Inspector
Clint Gale
The RETEC Group, Inc.
934 East 400 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
84102
801-359-3059 801-64t-9273
Certifuing BP
Representative
John W. Wigger
BP North America Inc
801 Warrenville Rd #800
Lisle, Illnois 60532
630434-5789
AMO72-1637s-727 5-l
2002 Annual Report - BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility - Salt Lake City, W
5.2 Post-Glosure Operations and Maintenance
Post-Closure operations and maintenance inspections will continue during
2003 in accordance with approved procedures detailed in the ClosurelPost-
Closure Plan. Semi-annual groundwater monitoring will be completed during
the first and third quarters of the year.
5.3 Post-Glosure Permit Modification
ln 2002, UDEQ requested that BP update and revise the CHWMF Post-
Closure Care and Monitoring Plan and the Post-Closure Permit to reflect site
ownership name change and document repository location change. These
revised documents are being reviewed by BP and will be submitted to UDEQ
during the second quarter of2003.
AMO72-16375-727 5-2
6 Post-Glosure Gost Estimation
Revision of post-closure cost estimates is required on an annual basis, as
specified in the Closure/Post-Closure Plans. The post-closure cost estimate
for 2003 is based on identified tasks required for post closure at the CHWMF.
Annual costs are based on approximate labor rates and estimated time or
materials required for the various tasks. Annual costs are multiplied times
18 years (amount of time remaining for management of the CHWMF) plus a
l0 percent contingency, resulting in an estimated total post-closure cost.
Future estimated post-closure costs are estimated at $877,000. Table 6
presents the post-closure cost estimate.
AMO72-16375-727 6-l
7 References
Dames & Moore, July 1986, Closure/Post-Closure Plans for Remote
Hazardous Waste Management Facility, Amoco Oil Company, Salt
Lake City, Utah
Hely, A.G., R.W. Mower, A.C. Harr, and T. Arnow, 1971, Water Resources
of Salt Lql(E County, Utah, State of Utah Dept. of Natural Resources,
Technical Publication No. 3j,.
TriTechnics, July 1997, Post-Closure Care and Monitoring Plan, Amoco
Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility, Amoco Oil Company,
Salt Lake City, Utah
AMO72-16375-727 7-1
8 Gertification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
design to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fine and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
3r')3
Date
AMO72-1637s-727 8-1
Tables
o
2002 Annual Report - CHYMF- Salt Lake Citv, Utah
Table {
Monitoring Well Gonstruction Detail and Sampling Rationale
BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility, Salt Lake City, Utah
Notes:
amsl = above mean sea level
NM = not measured
NA = not applicable
TOC = top of PVC casing (or steel casing for S-22 and S-23)
Constructed total depth of S-16 originally given as 21 .9 in Monitoring Plan - this is from ground surface
Total Depth from Top of Casing is 23.6 feet.
Station
Ground
Elevation
(ft amsl)
Top of
Casing
Elevation
{ft amsl}
Gasing
Material
Screened
lnterval
(ft bgs)
Gonstructed
Total Depth
(ft below TOC)
Rationale for Sampling
s-1 6
s-21
s-22
s-23
s-26
421t.t1
4211.00
NM
4209.90
NM
4219.45
4213.14
4213.43
4211.78
4212.00
z" I'v(,-
2'PVC
1.5" steel
1.5" steel
2'PVC
'l .u-zu.u
1.0-21.0
3.5-E.5
1.7-6.7
1.0-21.0
:z3.6
22.6
10.5
7.9
22.5
Upgradient Monitoring Well
s-31
s-32
s-33
RD-3
RD-4
4218.72
4218.67
4218.63
4217.10
4213.67
4219.45
4219.13
4219.26
4218.50
4215.39
2" PVC
2'PVC
2- PVC
4'PVC
4'PVC
19.4-23.8
19.6-24.1
19.8-24.2
70-80,90-100,
110-120
70-85, 105-120
25
25
25.4
120
120
wo-1
wo-2
wo-3
WQ-4
WQ.5
4213.45
4213.33
4213.44
4214.41
42',14.34
4214.06
4213.97
4214.08
4214.88
4214.89
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
34.8-43.8
33.7-42.8
34.4-43.5
34.7-43.8
34.0-43.1
44.6
44.3
44.7
44.9
44.4
Compliance Point Monitoring Well
Compliance Point Monitoring Well
Compliance Point Monitoring Well
Compliance Point Monitoring Well
Compliance Point Monitorino Well
TN-1A
TN-18
TN-1C
TN-2A
TN-28
TN-2C
4212.84
4213.25
4213.19
4212.26
4212.09
4212.14
4213.46
4213.78
4213.98
4212.83
4212.80
4212.86
2" PVC
2" PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
20.6-25
35.7-40.1
5s.4-59.8
20.4-24.8
35.2-39.6
55.4-59.8
26.2
41.3
60.9
25.7
41.1
61.4
TN-3A
TN-38
TN-3C
TN-44
TN-48
TN-4C
4211.91
4212.36
4212.42
4212.64
4212.65
4212.94
4212.67
4212.89
4212.90
4213.28
4213.18
4213.44
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
19.9-24.3
35.3-39.7
55.6-60.0
19.8-24.2
35.0-39.4
56.0-60.4
25.6
40.6
60.9
25.4
40.7
61.4
TN-5A
TN-58
TN-5C
SG.1
SG.2
4212.38
4212.35
4212.42
NA
NA
4212.90
4212.88
4212.92
4210.50
4209.74
2'PVC
2'PVC
2'PVC
NA
NA
20.3-24.7
33.8-38.2
55.0-59.4
NA
NA
25.9
39.6
60.5
NA
NA
l:\BP-CH\M4F\2002Annual Report\Tablel.xls\Table 1 Page 1 of 1 April 2003
2002 Annual Report - CHWMF - Salt Lake City, Utah
Table 2
Chronological Summary of 2002 Activities and Correspondence
Date Activity
March 12 Notification of semi-annual post-closure groundwater monitoring
schedule sent to UDEQ.
March 25 Annual classroom training performed for personnel assigned duties at
the CHWMF.
March 25 First Quarter 2002 containment cover and security inspections
performed.
April 1-2 Sem i-an n ual post-closu re g rou ndwater mon itori ng performed.
April 9 Semi-annual monitoring well integrity test performed.
April 12 Annual Report for 2001sent to UDEQ.
June 3 Second Quarter 2002 containment cover and security inspections
performed.
August 19 Notification of semi-annual post-closure groundwater monitoring
schedule sent to UDEQ.
September 4 Third Quarter 2002 containment cover and security inspections
performed.
September 4 Semi-annual monitoring well integrity test performed.
September 5-6 Sem i-a n n ual post-closu re g rou ndwater mon itori ng perfo rmed.
December 9 Fourth Quarter 2002 containment cover and security inspections
performed.
I :BP-CHWMF\2OO2Annual Report\Tbl\Table2.doc Page 1 of 1 April 2003
2002 Annual Report - CHWMF- Salt Lake Citv, Utah
Table 3
2002 Water Elevation Data BP Closed Hazardous Waste
Management Facility, Salt Lake City, Utah
Notes:
SG-1 and SG-2 are staff gauges in the Drain Canal
NM = not measured
l:\BP-CH\ /MF\2002Annual Report\
Tbl\Tbl 3_6.xls\Table 3
Station Water Level Elevation
3t2002
Water Leve! Elevation
9t2002
s-16
s-21
s-22
s-23
s-26
4210.O8
4210.43
NM
NM
4208.27
4209.21
4209.17
4207.85
4209.47
4208.91
s-31
s-32
s-33
RD-3A
RD-4
4211.19
4211.20
4211.'.16
4215.25
4213.32
4210.51
4210.44
4210.44
4215.57
4212.63
WQ-1
WQ-2
WQ-3
WQ-4
WQ-5
4209.54
4209.38
4211.28
4211.64
4212.58
4208.31
4207.39
4210.07
4210.15
4211.43
TN-14
TN-1B
TN-1C
TN-24
TN-2B
TN-2C
4208.75
4209.17
4210.36
4209.13
4210.16
4211.45
4206.91
4207.78
4209.89
4206.94
4208.98
4211.04
TN-34
TN-38
TN-3C
TN-44
TN-48
TN-4C
4208.93
4210.86
4211.77
4210.03
4210.78
4212.29
4207.70
4210.08
4211.37
4209.30
4211.79
4212.08
T N-54
TN-58
TN-5C
SG-1
SG-2
4210.30
4211.58
4212.61
NM
4206.04
4209_78
4211.24
4212.24
NM
4208.44
Page 'l of 1 April2003
2002 Annual Report - CHWMF- Sak Lake Citv. Utah
Location
March 2002 September 2002
Field
Specific
Conductance
(pS/cm)
Field pH Temperature
(oF)
Field
Specific
Conductance
(pS/cm)
Field pH Temperature
fF)
WQ-1 2,778 8.20 60.1 15,830 7.2E 71.9
WQ-2 2,576 8.09 59.8 14,290 7.35 71.7
WQ-3 11.230 8.26 59.2 8,400 7.64 61.7
WQ4 4,515 7.29 60.3 14,970 7.26 61.4
WQ-5 10.970 7.51 61.8,900 7.27 63.2
s-16 13.860 7.31 61.4 12,100 6.72 66.6
Table 4
2002 Groundwater Field Parameter Results BP Closed
Hazardous Waste Management Facility, Salt Lake City, Utah
I :\BP-CHWMF\2002Annual Report\
Tbl\Tbl 3_6.xls\Table 4 Page 1 of 1 April2003
(f,ooN
CL
sieF >5x
o
tll
EI
a.
Gaa
NooN
e.E
=
|r)o o oF
rO lO lo ln o
o
UI
trt
a-
EGq
Noo(\
oa
Eo
sa6
rO tn rr,(,l()lr)o ro lO
seo9
o o o o o n o o o o o o o rO o n o o
oct!
i iD='-o=q:x
o
Io o |o Io rO o o o o Io lo lr)|r)o o o o o
o
o
EE,
UJ
o o o o o o o Ir,o n o rO |o to o o o Io
ogo
o0=OE"
C'o
o o o lo o rr)n lO o o o o o l()o rO n ro
o
(l,
oo=oo,
ooa
o l()(:If,,o o o o o o rO o o o o o o o
LOaPE6e
o
o o o o lO o o o o o lO o lo o o o fnoj
o
o!l
5 o=5=E5E=oF
o o o o o o n a r)o o o lo o rr)o lo o
oo=N90,vo
o o o r()rJ)o 1()n o o o o rO ra lo a lO o
E.5 =oEE,)ootro:g66
lOo o
j
rOoci
raC l()qo
rc
C
lr)oo
lr,oo (z
o
c
r)3i
occ
looc;
rr)o rr)oci
o3j
lOoo (
z
eE
tr.!
,FE
IJ
NI3
o:ENIo
=;Io
ts
I 1
=
raI
3
@
a
:aE.g!
cc)
E
_o
oil
Ycg!o IoR
NI1
o
NI
;I3 t Y
=
rr:I
=
c
I
.Yc
-qtrt
c0)
E.93olrl
llcsE
c
!
o
ocn6I
Eoo.0,t
E
*:e=96tt2X
=@.6-'!-*=
o
,_o
oo.o9,(s
(E
o.oo
DoopoEoo
.t2
=U'oLco
(ULc0)oco(.)EoEoo.c)
o)E
.(Ugs
7o.Ee
(E=sro!+E.oJ(D^oNts.c _Da-(Ud--6?E'-;(E(o-:fYO(Uu6 c,?,o- lt uEE< trzsz=
*{
I
_t*3
U
I
=(.t
GIL
co
Eo
E')Gtr(E
=o+ro(E
=o
o!,t-GNG
!,oooo
o-o
o
=oot
Go
->(E
<-trbs
(EJ
=*,E.tsE rr
og)LJso q
9^rJ-oiits(!0 (EFNU,
2002 Annual Reoort - CHWMF- Salt Lake Citv. Utah
Table 6
2002 Post-Glosure Gost Estimate BP Closed
Hazardous Waste Management Facility, Salt Lake City, Utah
Item
Quarterly Facility I nspections
Cover and security inspection - Fl and assistant, 4 hr x 4 inspections @ $SOnr
Equipment and materials
Semi-annual Ground Water Monitoring
Sampling - Fl and Assistant, 48 hr x 2 events @ $SOnr
Evaluation and reporting - FC,24 hr x 2 events @ $AOlnr
Analytical costs, equipment and materials
Semi-Annual Ground Water Levels
Ground water level monitoring - Fl and Assistant, 32 hr x 2 events @ $SOnr
Equipment and materials
Annual lnspection
Monitor well integrity tests - Fl and Assistant, 40 hr @ $SOnr
Equipment and materials
Annual Training - 4 staff, 16 hr @ $50/hr
lrregular Maintenance
Cover soils and vegetation
Surface water and drain maintenance
Security maintenance
Replacement of monitoring wells:
- assume replace five during post-closure period:
5 wells @ $5,000/well/25 years
Five Year Permit Review
Negotiation and permit amending - FC, 80 hr @ $80/hr
(4 permit reviews/remaining # of years)
Annual Reporting, Management and Safety/gHSEr - FC, 200 hr @ $80/hr
Annua! Cost x 18 Years
$2,000
$400
$800
$1,600
$200
$4,800
$3,840
$7,500
$1,600
$500
$1,500
$750
$750
$1,000
$0
$16,000
$28,800
$3,600
$86,400
$69,120
$135,000
$28,800
$9,000
$36,000
$7,200
$14,400
$27,000
$13,500
$13,500
$18,000
$19,200
$288,000
I :\BP-CH\ /MF\2002Annual Report\
Tbl\Tbl 3_6.xls\Table 6
Subtotal
Contingency at10%
Tota! Post-CIosure Costs
$43,240 $797,520
$79,752
$877,272
Page 1 of 1 April 2003
Figures
!:
:'::oi::
\
!:
:
_tr!
\
(:l
.\:
i.-
-l
+
s23++s21 + s22
s11
APPROXIIVATI
CHWMF BOT'NDARY
4 TN-S 6, 27j_: +__ .Lryg_Wo:4- - - -6uo=to-'-6rcO'_1?o-e li\\t\
+ \\
s33 \co,11 co-l._._.-.a.._._._. _._._e. i
\
\\
\
"
co-5
@
\
\
\
).co s1
\
\
I co-r4#q
CO
).co
1
\
\
\q
o-g
\
\\
\
e'
/- OIL ORAIN CANAL
sio +25 +
S S no-+ t'o
,*-o, @TN-3 (
\3-fffi--+---s-c;
\\\r\\r \\\\i il
\"\ \i *L co.6 d\\ \i \\ o- - sa-z {o -'il\\ \, '"' 'o"\
\\\\ \r \\\tr,\! r\ \
\\\Y ^\I":'", \
\\\ \,. +\\\ \ \ s31
\\\ \
\\\ \ \sco'
\t\\, ^v*,\\\\ \:lt _
-+-----*---S=1€PERMANENT SUMP 526
+
s28
1+
s60
I
150 0 300
:
1 "=300'
&nErEc
LEGEND
COMPLIANCE WELLS
WATER QUALITY MoNIToRING WELLS
WATER LEVEL MONITORING WELLS
+ sHALLow
O NESTED
+ DEEP
8 DRAIN CLEANOUT RISER
S STAFF GUAGE
SLURRY WALL
COMPLIANCE POINT
CHWMF 2002 Annual Report
BP Products North America, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT (AMO72-16315-721\
CHWMF MONITORING WELL
LOCATION MAP
+
s23
NM
Ts21 $4210.43 {
s11
NM
f,'3L'7++
s24
NM
5N
o\
NO
\iB-
\\
+
s22
NM
25
4211.02
42',12.58
APPROXIIIAI E
CHW[1F EOUNDARY
,* \\
, + ::::\ ----)I, s32 '. .: .\
\
4211'20 \'-.
'\\\\ ---.-
\\"-'\%-
\\ \ --.^ -.. '\
^A \ -\., -\-ft-\ \ -'..
"o,l\ t K-. '.. 'z'-rr\ \ + \-\.. -\. \,
\\ \1 o,??l,n \ '\r. '..-
\\\ \
42111v
"
.\\\\
"",\\\\ i ".. n..
\\$il,^\* "
='o. \
\\+209.5+ \ \ '\
/
N
I
150 0ffi
1
&nETEc
s26_
208.27
LEGEND
COMPLIANCE WELLS
WATER QUALITY MONITORING WELLS
WATER LEVEL MONITORING WELLS
+ sHALLow
V STAFFGUAGE
4208.88 GROUNDWATER ELEVATTON (ft. AMSL)
^^a- GROUNDWATER ELEVATTON-4Lw CONTOUR (ft. AMSL)
NM NOTMEASURED
SLURRY WALL
COMPLIANCE POINT
CHWMF 2002 Annuat Report
BP Products North America, lnc, Salt Lake City, UT (AMO72-16375-727)
SHALLOW WATER TABLE ELEVATION
CONTOUR MAP - APRIL 2OO2
' APPROXII.,IAT[
Ci-.1WMF BOUNDARY
4209.21
I t
+
s28
NM
+
s60
NM
LEGEND
COMPLIANCE WELLS
WATER QUALITY MoNIToRING WELLS
WATER LEVEL MONITORING WELLS
+ sHALLow
S STAFFGUAGE
4209.21 cRoUNDWATER ELEVAT|oN (ft. AMSL)
,^^- GROUNDWATER ELEVATTON-['lva coNTouR (ft. AMSL)
NM NOTMEASURED
SLURRY WALL
COMPLIANCE POINT
150 0 300E
1 "=300'
&nErEc
CHWMF 2002 Annuat Report
BP Products North America, lnc, Satt Lake City, UT (AMO72-16375-727)
SHALLOW WATER TABLE ELEVATION
CONTOUR MAP . SEPTEMBER 2OO2
Appendix A
2002 Gorrespondence
Appendix A Table of Contents
Date To X'rom Subject Page
No.
3lt2l02 Dennis R. Downs,
UDEO
Mark Roginske,
RETEC March Sampling Schedule A-l
9/19102 Dennis R. Downs,
TIDEO
Mark Roginske,
RETEC September Sampling Schedule A-2
o
o
The RETEC Group, lnc.
First Commerce Center, Suite 2006
175 West 200 Soutr
Salt Lal<e City, UI84101-1456
&Rrrrc
(801) 3593059 Phone
(801) 35$3307 Fax
www.retec.com
March 12,2002
Mr. Dennis R. Downs
Executive Secretary
Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board
Department of Environmental eualityDivision of Solid and Hazardous Waste
288 North 1460 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
RE: BP CIIWMF
EPA ID No. UTD000826370
SffW Tracking No. MOD9g.00469
Dear Mr. Downs:
In accordance with the RCRA Permit for the BP Closed Hazardous Waste ManagementFacility, The RETEC Group, Inc. on behalf of BP, is providing written notification ofplans to conduct semi-annual groundwater monitoring activitiJs. Inspections will bemade on March 25, 2002, and groundwater samples-will be collected on March 25through 29,2002.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (g0l) 359-3059 ext. 102.
Sincerely,
The RETEC Group,Inc.
fi(-ut {'r-t--
Mark F. Roginske
Facility Coordinator
cc: Ed Deputy, UDSHW
John Wigger, BP
file
H:\AMo53-1 51 24 -- cHWMFlcorrespondence\3-1 2sample Notificaiion.doc
A-1
The RETEC Group,lnc.
First Commerce Center, Suite 2006
'175 West 200 Soulh
Saft Lake City, UT M101-1456
&Rrrrc
(801) 3593059 Phone
(8ol)359.33[7 Fu
wvlv.rctec.com
September 19,2002
Mr. Dennis R. Downs
Executive Secretary
Utatr Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board
Department of Environmental eualityDivision of Solid and Hazardous Waste
288 North 1460 West
Salt Iake City, Utah 84114-4890
RE: BP CIfWMf,'
EPA ID No. UTD000826370
SHW Tracking No. MOD9g.00469
Dear Mr. Downs:
Ed Deputy, UDSHW
John Wigger, BP
file
In accordance with the RCRA Permit for the BP Closed Hazardous Waste ManagementFacility, The RETEC Group, Inc. on behalf of BP Americ4 Inc., is providing writtennotification of plans to conduct semi-arurual groundwater monitoring activities.Inspections will be. mlde- on September 3, 2002,laoa groundwate, ,"-i1", will becollected on September 3 through 6,2002.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (g0l) 359-3059 ext. 102.
Sincerely,
The RETEC Group,Inc.'/(,'?,{^*iu
Mark F. Roginske C
Facility Coordinator
I :\BP - cl-lwMFu002\conespondence\9-02sampre Notifi cation.doc
Appendix B
2002 lnspection Reports, Field
Sampling Logs and Ghain-of-Gustodies
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-31
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF Post-Closure lnspection Report
Evaluation of Results of Semi-Annual
Groundwater Detection Monitoring
Facility lnspector:
Date of Sampling:
Page 1 of 1
oate: L/-9o_ oI/Time: Q. q{ a '
/lorlc /?o",,..,ki',J
A/t/oa a*r L//z/o=--
No(Y)
Date:'l /"/'-
Examine laboratory analytical report forms. Do the resutts from any of the sampledcompliance point wells (Wells WQ-1 through WO-s) gqGNqr exceed the followingconcentration Limits for the indicated parameters: tves,(No] )Parameter Concentration Limit
1,1 Dichloroethane 5
1,1 Dichloroethylene 5Chloroform 5
1,1,1 Trichloroethane 5
Carbon Tetrachloride 5Benzene sToluene 5Ethylbenzene 5
Xylene, Total bChromium S0
lf yes, indicate well number and concentration reported and notify the FC immediately.
lf yes, follow the procedures of Section 2.2 of the Post-Closure Care and Monitoring Plan.
lf no, attach laboratory report sheets and file.
\\Retec-saltlake\Projects\AMC63-15124 CHWMF\34109 - CHWMF\permit Renewal\pERMtTNEW-CAR\AMR31.DOCMarch21,2OO2
(dt)
B-1
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-21
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure lnspection Report
Quarterly lnspection of Site Security
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of 1
oate: 25 , YWa( , /\ Z- rime: l.f X)
Facirity rnspector: W|arc,4 Al^ n q lieb
WeatherConditions: Cool, eLO^/, ,,.- ll qu F
&st@ry#rd: lmmedffe?:yes ( ) NilX) Reportins?: yes (
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
Approved:
SECURIW SYSTEM
Fence lntegrity
Are there breaks in the fence around the HWMF which arelarge enough for a person or child to pass through?
Gate Lock
Are the locks missing or damaged?
Posted Warning Signs
Are the signs in place and readable?
Date: 1/r/OL
r[1Or l*
r YlD t r
AMo53-15124-CHWMF\3-4109-cl-twMRpermitRENEWAL\PERMl't\NEW-CAR\AMR21.Doc
B-2
)No(x
Answer
Yes or No
r l4C->t a-
Note: R" means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
lf the Fence lntegrity or Gate Lock qygslo^n: are answered yes, notify FC immediately, if the posted WarningSigns question is answered no, notify FC immediately. Rlcord any repairs, maintenance or investigationactivities and dates conducted:
March 21, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-22
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF Post-Closure lnspection Report
Quarterly Cover and Evaporation pond Area lnspection
Salt Lake City, Utah
Answer
Yes or No
r hDr n"
t WO la.
t {lOta.
t71Dtn.
Page 1 of2
oate' 25, trWtr,iL rime: I l'lk)
Facility lnspector: WonK A"ft1t l;eb
WeatherConditions: COOI , ClAr^atg ^.. tqSoF
) No (X Reporting?: yes ( ) No 1)g
Approved:Date: L//{/ 0
Facility
COVER
Are there any trees or shrubs growing on
the cover?
Are there any holes or gullies eroded partially
through the cover largerthan 10 square feet?
Are there any holes in the cover which expose
the waste?
Are there any obvious depressions in the cover
surface with seftlement of 6 inches or more?
Are there any areas along the perimeter of the
cover which show visible signs of seepage?
Are there burrows present large enough to indicate
the presence of large burrowing animals?
Arlps3-151211{E$,t'E \3-{10HHHMp\peaEit Renewal\perait\Nen-Car\AIirB22. Doc
B_3
l[tO r n-
tWDta.
Note: R" means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
lmmediate?;Yes (
March 21, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-22
Quarterly Cover and Evaporation pond Area lnspections
Page2of 2
RUN-ON RUN-OFF CONTROL STRUCTURES
General Drainage on Site
ls there ponded water at any location within
the compliance boundary?
EP Drainage Pipes
Are drain pipes to south drainage canal
blocked with debris, sediment or vegetation
growth?
Are one-way valves on drain pipes stuck or
unable to be rotated?
Gas Vents
Are vent riser pipes damaged or cracked?
.eltos3-1512{-CB}tUa\3-{1O9-CEHME\per:oi t Renewal\perait\Ner_Car\AtG,22 . Doc
84
tl[\Dt
r f1l)l R.
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
rfl0t n.
th(Jtn.
,J d/\/'- o
lf any of the above questions are answered "yes" notify the FC immediately and schedule for maintenance.
Record any activities and maintenance or repairs performed and dates:
tlk
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
llarch 21, 2O02
Facility lnspector: flA" Al", o,' i* I leb
weatherconditions: (2o l, cl oyd, ! * q 5o r
e@dry5#;7tmmediate? v"s 6i ieportins?: ves @
Date: u/{/ a"u/
WelllD Elevation
Top of pVC
feet)
4219.67
4213.14
4213.43
4211.78
4212.00
4219.45
4219.13
4219.26
4218.50
4215.39ll zta.oa
4213.97
4214.08
4214.88
4214.89
4213.46
4213.78
4213.98
4212.83
4212.80
4212.86
4212.67lztl,{t
l.g _.-- Uv)
22.5 s 3.7525.0 A.?b25.0
-7.q9
POST-CLOSURE PLANBP CHWMF
Form AMR_14
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure lnspection ReportSemi-Annual Groundwater Level Monitoring
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of2
rime: ll-t30
s-16
s-21
s-22
s-23
s-26
s-31
s-32
s-33
RD-3
RD4
WQ-1
WQ-2
WQ-3
WQ-4
wo-s
TN-1A
TN-18
TN-1C
TN-2A
TN-28
TN-2C
TN-3A5-t\
S-to
5 -?",l
z{
z1
5- zB
s'60
Q zoq.s''r
ct zol,z{4ztl,zs
4zrt.&'tL1g17.sB
LlLot,T5
q zoq. t7
Vtuo,>6t1uof,.6
Total Depth Measured Depth
of Well to Water(feet) (feet)
44.3 ..-- H . aq ----=--
44.7 _ 1.4044.e- 3.'24
--=l--.
- Lrrt( l^, trtrtfRt{ZeV.'27
Ucrt, t9
25.4 g.1o
120.0 3.?520.0 *+ ? .o.f44.6-'-* 4 ' 5Lo7120.0
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)
4zit.to
Ll zrt , 19lti{.tE|i L $.au
2.6.?- - 4.lt41.3 ___--__._ *.Cr.
33? - Z:!h
4 z.to, ttUzt,i5Aza\,'t3
?ztz,3v
42.,9, +{
.93. _
//tt+-
-- k V,2 tlCU tr.J Lr^tfrrt*t ,l.,tt 4 zot 97
?Lt t
Az-tt'
Aurz.
'/ztz,
$rt
-14914
td p$rf tt
q L t( .O?-_r/
t3
1,8 t
UFJ,l,zi
5ro -
,5vc r^! ",kt€?____*_ VZcts.k/
\\Retec-salflake\Projects\AMo53-15124 CHWMF\3_4109Mardr 21, 2002
t1 ZctJt 6 Z
CHWMflPermit Renewal\PERMnNEW-CAR\AMR14.Doc
Measure water levels in allwells listed-
t)u: n^rNCI\ A,+rf-A
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-14
WelllD Elevation
Top of pVC
(feet)
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
SemLAnnual Groundwater Level Monitoring
TN-38
TN-3C
TN*4A
TN4B
TN-4C
TN-5A
TN-s8
TN-sC
sG-1 *
SG-2 *
4212.89
4212.90
4213.28
4213.18
4213.44
4212.90
4212.88
4212.92
4210.50 **
4209.74 **
TotalDepth
of Well
(feet)
40.6
60.9
25.4
40.7
61.4
25.9
39.6
60.5
Page2ot2
Measured.Depth
to Water
(feet)
7 ,o3
l,15s.6
?. rlo
t. rr
?. bo
l. 50o,3r
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)
4 LO ,VL
t47, t t .1?
.LlLto,o3
Ltt-to 'zYQarT'?4tlzlo,e
Qut '{8tiLl L'bl
Surface Water Elevation (ft)
q246.oY
w
3.rc
Evaluate groundwater flow directions. Are there
fewer than three monitoring wells downgradient
of the facility?
Answer
Yes or No
t l/o ,a.
Note: R" means that this item is a reporting response; l" means this item requires an immediate response.
lf any question has been answered in the affirmative, notify the FC immediately.
Record any maintenance or repairs performed and the dates.
* SG-1 and SG-2 are stream gauges in the Drain Canal.** Elevation of top of gauge.
t*Y ya-a ir,innr-cd o{ fcp;r
\\Retec-sald a ke\Projects\AMO53 - 1S 1 24
March 21, 2002 Renewa|\PERMflN EW-CAR\AMR14. DOC
M
cHwMF\3-4109
B-6
CHWMF\Permit
BP CHWMF
SEMIANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL: tv,L. C-fzr
wELL Ne.: UA-S
DArE: L, ftl1o z+IWME_srARrED: l?A€'-FINISHED: l40O
Measurement Summary:
Datum: aop o{ C ali nq (l o c\
Depth to Water: Z .j I -
Totaldepth: t14't1
Water cotumn length: hZ.OqWater cotumn votume: lo .eoz <U, ! V.q Il-- 3S.'r
FinalpH: A;n1 -'- SampleAppearance:
FinalSC: 14 y4zt Cleon, XcllaithFinal Temp.:11v1A
Other:
'l,,$6"dilft
,ff uffi "r*'fir!trg##rilfr7#|#:i{^,,
pH
4.Ltq783?.ql
-
SC
ffig
Temp
Volume
Evacuated
--5@:-UILffi[,i.7
Time
Total gallons evacuated: AO
Sample bottles:
ldentification,40nil
Zsolol9
lnstruments:
pH meter:
SC meter:
Water level
Calibration time:ll jo
Comments
Ql"oq g,glb,a'et
Ciqtr. uCllaighcital, $clla"';sh
Parameter: VO C No.: 3
I
t1w}iLe
yltowl.^(rr)
Calibration standards: ?,10, t-l
Calibration standard i,: I 0,0OOCorrection factor: ;4 {p
MarchAMO053-1 51 24-CHWMF\341 09-CH\A/I\4Fpermit Renewal\pER|EITCHWMFLOG.DOC
quo'
22,2002
BP CHWMF
SEMI ANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
LOCATION:WELL No.: t,+l A- 4
DATE: Lilt/oL
TIME STARTED: lL,l 03
FINTSHED: lLv.tA
Final pH: n nzt
Final SC: tt vn
FinalTemp.t wt/A
Other:
-r-Sampling Summary: ?wq.d jUolyr*2frta{'tc?.t4y'hh1,&o*ara.tar p luc../ dOr**;rlo/V,n1bp.A
Sampling Method: (2,ru^i(o1
Evacuati-on Method: (hr^ni(o',
SCstqb,ry'u) Clcor , Wib. irh- Ci<a.r', {<llcu,ti+h
Temp
0z,iir?3
-.--
pHgTime
itlr7..ttfln ffijg,_
Total gallons evacuated: 4O
Sample bottles:
ldentification: 4O '-',1 Parameter:
"MEtiLEEkn5
5
I
lnstruments:
pH meter: Aqalar . 1n4M *f-
SC meter: Wi)^r - $n cloot fr-
Water level m"eter: gaini+r
Calibration time: \lgl [*i, o
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL: I/Y\f., IV;
Measurement Summary:
ffii1il's?#tle;'n5((oL)Toialdepth: ALl"q
W:Ei::ixill i"'ji3H;' ?|uYrte" \7'$j'r'3 -' j$:+'q
voc
/l\.ArV fLr\
Calibration standards: a,lO, t 4
Calibration standard : * to, oL,o
Correction factor: -,yr1 q
Sample Appearance:
Clcal, ?Jclb,, iS h
Volume
Evacuated Comments
4-CHWMFB.41 O9-CHWMFPermit Rene\ at\pERIS_nIHWMFLOG.DOC March22,2OO2
BP CHWMF
SEMIANNUAL WATER QUALIW SAMPLTNG
FIELD LOG
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL:
Final pH: VI t4n
FinalSC: vt rrn
FinalTemp.: nr^A
Other:
WELL NO.:_ (^J0- 3DATE: t-t /Z/ a ZTIME STARTED: o gU)
FINISHED:4i q, LLg
Sample Appearance:cw4''yi iti*trt', , ol{dlkrwwr
Measurement Summary:
Datum: aCL
Depth to Water: ,Z #-Totaldepth: UL|.}C
Water column length: 't4l,q
water column ;ffi;, C,$+nl, = lZ,gT X3 =3$.ttl
Time
6tu,y
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample bottles:
ldentification:
lnstruments:
qO
Parameter: VnfWA No.: 5
i
Calibration standards: V,10, t 4
Calibration standard '..+.11s gr 1;,Correction factor: n n
P'),
u
3i22Y)2{#; :f:fll i ;;:W,{,*'ct { ia-' P'', cr*o ? n yl, n 1 cz;*a-aer
Sampling Method: favl ; { i aslEvacuation Method: .tz*l i { lcri_,t
pH
b"Z'\ru
SC
\oQActtt?3cl
Temp
5_LzbI-z
Volume
Evacuated Comments
?J) t.lcar. rqlla*;,h, e(kru a,c.e,rtt4n
pH meter:
SC meter:
ti'kiilhh\*ilFpermitReneraa,\pERru,-EHwMFlocDoc
March22,2OO2
BP CHWMF
SEMI ANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
CLlENT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL:
yf+.l.3i-P#-z
MvtE SIARTED: OeSS
FINISHED: l3oO
Measurement Summary:
Datum: TOC-
Depth to Water: q,m
Totaldepth: Ut-1.j' '
Water cotumn tength: 24.+tWater cotumn votume: tr,El t l"-- lZSl 132 37, 5Final pH: n wr eample Appearance:Finat sc: r,t rr''r
-
at, b;i),J, e#o,,d*c rtFinal Temp.: ntArrlnei-.
-
:Ti:x: ffirr,ld!,M fr'B r-r c*, o,d ivt ^f*ffih|,m?w,i,;-a;;;;;:
Evacuation Method: r.al, {lant
ll"r,teol bLr.A d^p
Time
F'-t)Vzo
pH
&.t6
E.M
SC
iF#.:IL
utrra_
Temp
(c0 itiq 4.
Volume
Evacuated Comments
lqB_*on,, l4c tt:':
Total gallons evacuatedt l4O
Sample bottles:
ldentification hOw\wrbtg Parameter:No.: -5
)l
lnstruments:
pH meter:
SC meter:Calibration standards: ?rl O,dCalibration standard :
Correction factor: r,,f ' o' ooo
u,'4/ o
v6y.
1 24-CHWMF\341 Og-CFtWMFpermit Renewat\pERI\ffi*WMFLOG.DOC March22,2002
BP CHWMF
SEMIANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
PE
wELL uo,' F q- LDATE: 4/z/oz '!
TIME STARTED: ljpf
FINISHED:
Measurement Summary:
Datum:
Depth to Water: )WToialdepth: 4q UO
Water column lenoth: W.O$
Water column vollme: b.*+to'- 17.*\,ii31,+l
FinalpH: tn vr.r Samole Aooearance:ai ;7,- [i- i t""t, e,{ l*' ds*.,,-r
5 41all or,,s. a I I o,.-<a\ v.-v I I + c> ta-Lv,"3e- i c> i-', n
Volume
Evacuated Comments
-,k*gLca', 17117;, e/'b "cs
tu't
FinalSC: n |^4
S-ampling Summary: yd.lt ran"[r5 ay'<tr Z
f dor4ofunlalirg. , _ /., ,Sampling Uenoalred i ( | 9d
Evacuation Method: r<.d i ( I Ot)
Time
fijl-
lnstruments:
pH
$.u)
SC
Rs.r-
Temp
loO t
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample bottles:
ldentification : h0 r*t vial5
@_$d5
Parameter:No.: j
IffiTe.)
pH meter:
SC meter:
Water level
Calibration time:
L Calibration standards: 7, t O, 4
Calibration standard'. n'1c2, O 0o
Correction factor: nft Or'/Ytr
CLIENT: b ?
LOCATION:
\ "1' 1r' \
r rM\NM Fpe rm it Re newa ru, E Rfrrin nwu rroc ooc March22,2OO2
BP CHWMF
SEM]ANNUAL WATER QUALIW SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
cLrENr: b P
LOCATION: iI
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL:
FinalpH:4 rn '"' " -
FinalSC: v1w1
WELL No.: 5- I lJ
DATE: L1/z/oz
TIME STARTED: l4]D
FTNTSHED: i5q0
Measurement Summary:
Datum: (AO
Depth to ivater:{.5't
Totaldepth: 1.5.3
Watercolumn length: 13.?f { O'?q-
Watercotumn volfme:' lO.$= Xj |Z,Ucl
'^yl;Erarance:
Sampling Summary:
Sampling Method: feal; (lpv-t
Evacuation Method: t'<cAi (lout
l},?bw
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample bottles:
ldentification: 4Ar,,l
*tcn (ci5
Volume
Evacuated Comments
Aa",r
C.le ca,r
tb,L5-B-
..:-
Temp
W
bt.Lt
=
pH
VA?3t
=
Time
145t_TF-rh l(.l
-
Parameter: V0 A
wvtul< Ar)No.: 3
t
lnstruments:
ptlmeter: lJnlat ,rn4@l &L
SC meter: llirlac gnatffiiWL
Water level fileter: {^f iny
Calibration time: QSre
Calibration standards: 7, I O, tl
Calibration standard 1 *t0,CI0O
Correction factor: 6 4
D.r,/' ulv
FinalTemo.'. ra,,vv\
'']m) "Mpermit Renewa^pER,uirrrHwMFLoc.Doc March22,2002
Facility tnspector: C &rO
WeatherConditions: CIA*A, lr't at6.y
Yes (
Complete these columns only if seal crackingis visually observed.
Vlslatsigns lnitiat ?"p!f, Depth to Water After 15 Differenceof Seal to Water Minutes oi W.t", Apptied in Measuredcrackino? (feet) to seilat surrace ri#ii'"o -' "6ll,i.S_(ft)
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-15
Bp Closed HWIIF post_Closure lnspection ReportAnnual Monitor Well lntegrity TestJ ' '---'-
Salt Lake City, Utan -
Page 1 of3
oate: ?-APP - zto z rime: Oq aO
Afo
ArOt^, ST*^'DI^&
trrr STANbrr&
Aro
,\tO
NO
,\ro
^loi\,'Offo
^ioAJ.o
lno
Ar0tN
ru+s
No( X
tl-t{ 3o F
)
Date:t-?-0>
MONITOR WELL FUNCTION TESTS
Surface Seal lntegrity Test
WelllD
;
s-21
s-22
s-23
D-Zb
s-31
s-32
s-33
WQ-1
WQ-2
WQ.3
WQ.4
WQ-5
TN-1A
TN-18
TN-1C
brilfR
r.ArfQ
S-'ft.
9k.*.
(r1r>
b
- &U,A lngT GVf To utCLLS rnl Sfnrr0rnfa ll&He
Amo5$15124-cHwMFR4iog-cHWMFlpermit Renewal war\pERMrr\l.rEW-CARIAMRls.Doc
%q%IQ
\
B-13
March 21, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-15
WelllD
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
Annual Monitor Well lntegrity Tests
Page 3 of 3
lnitial Depth Depth to Water After Depth to Water
to Water Removing 0.5 Gallons g Hours After(feet)of Water lniection
Difference
Between lnitial
and FinalDeoth
WQ-1
WQ-2
WQ-3
WQ.4
WQ-5
TN-1A
TN-1B
TN-1C
TN-2A
TN-2B
TN-2G
TN.3A
TN-3B
TN.3C
TN-4A
TN4B
TN-4C
TN-5A
TN-58
TN-sC
ls the difference in measured depths
after 8 hours for any of the wells
greater than 4 inches (0.33 feet)? t I
Note any wells that need surface seal maintenance or redevelopment. Report to FC and schedule maintenance.Record activities and any repairs or maintenance performed and dates:
Amo53-1 51 24-CI-{WMF\3-/11 o$CHWMFlFermit Renewal wal\PERMIT\NE\A,-CAR\AMR1 5.DOC
B-14
March 21, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-15
WelllD
Annual Monitor Well lntegrity Tests
Page 2 of 3
Complete these columns only if seal cracking
is visually observed.
Visual Signs lnitial Depth Depth to Water After 1S
cqou
Difference
TN-2A
TN-28
TN.2C
TN-3A
TN-3B
TN-3C
TN4A
TN-48
TN-4C
TN-5A
TN-58
TN-5C
of Seal to Water Minutes of Water AppliedCrackinq? (feet) to Seal at Surface (feet) Oeptni ittt
Arc
lrlo J.o
Aro
Ar$
lrto
ttO
^roAfl
Aro
/,tO/\N
ls the difference in
for any of the wells greater
than one inch (0.2 ft.)?
MONITOR WELL RESPONSE TESTS - /JgT
Well lD lnitial Depth Depth to WaterAfter
tl
fu-A"-*t *+L
+rcrs,#ercr++-Tttt S
Depth to Water
Removing 0.5 Gallons 8 Hours After
of Water lniection
to Water_ (feet)
s-16
s-21
s-22
s-23
s-26
s-31
s-32
s-33
Form AMR-15
WelllD
(feet)
o WE.i
Annual Monitor Well lntegrity Tests '{1's
Page 3 of 3
Por
o**o
q.rA{.FSn
Difference
Between lnitial
Difference
Between lnitial
POST.CLOSURE PLAN
in Measured
lnitialDeptti Depth to Water
Amo53-1 51 24-CHWMF\3-41 09-CHWMF\Permit Renewat
B-1
\
5
and Final Depth
March21,2002
T
REHEGl.LES
8i.a-T6r..Eg;
EE
EBe55p
{$8E-sI-'iro;i.o
EE
RExf
E$o-E
=
JJJIIJ
:;zo
u,(tf
a
=
lrl-I E=-I E-*I 6rr
F E!;
guFllJ*lttfuJil**lurt
oJ
3
5E
UlErt-.i
o,:"4,
G!,
'tl.:tI
E
!tS,..
;;,4
. i.r.i
.D'rie
,,-!tt'Jp;
;.H
' :i.. ..+-r' i"
;.,o
"E,,fr
11.f..
. /r0
1"rtlli*x
,,tA
,:53
'r{Br.iC!:tGI
,:#
,*SA'lrd,rf;
r"ql!;;*d
,,il-:, i
-d
rdi
lli.-l
i'-:
\f /) TqvLlt x v x ltiL-lr,
*11'r+o^x I x x xlxx ,ffi#
;EsrlF.liY.|*',Gii{:ErEl{:s s :T ]s I f.
,-I;.9'._:tI.3
'-r}r'r.a!
:.,fl'
I(a
TE
ji'.;;.:,; t'iI ::i" i,i.&r-
t
s.
qCs
\Y
.l
ts
!
\
*x6lr
i*JOiE9q)o-
ffii{t|${></XD<{t*
o
E,E
6.ce=.. t
8EE6te6S
EEg=
Cfeego9CO.=t.F!r<EFea9d
5F
Eo3&
xoIL
oEoGo-
t;l€
IrJ;
iE:8i3i:aOu
,o=tt= !lrSc
: Et)-c cl.l,, aD:,Cl.tra
ffilffi I
.'ld,.i.fIrl€-*rli,.#':al.':i
r.i( j: l
(
j
s
sq
s*
*Y X I \1 *.
,8,#,q
I!t,i-+lb4*!+.fifi
;;..€-:r-::."G1ffiEEfiHI;#4'E#d"A+F;,I"+-*
:i-+1,9!,.*.?4!tIt-ffi';:. dl3i4flffi+{$tj'.iF.rI ri ESiis.xliil:-,:!t {
i.;li[-;;J#
Ir*"t?ii
l,T"-',i
I :' -,ri
n
M
s N
enN
k
s
ln
s stn
Ns
AIs
a
+s
e
\-
,q
Nt:r $
$N+$
l/^tg
3
tq
I
a
t6t
1
{
et\
r
Iq
\
\l
cf'
-tI
.ss(
$
"{al'i:f
irtl-fl
rl*SriilBitr
-l'f 5:t llE,r,tf..-,"cil
. '.,0r. ,81-iifilr
"*6." 1FH.."[.-..tlt:
*
ES
)
)
EoaJclt
=(J
ra-oc
(U-c()
0)
CL
E(U
U)
CU(o
J
c\l
olBEIE
-
lr=
-18rg l>,c5 l=r- l6
-t\El,6tg lo
EIFolo, IFI(EIFIrAtqlr-ltsl
-lLI
-ldtol
=ldl
4iiil
o$n
B-16
EJJII*I E
o r;; Illl* *lu ilr ilr plll* itt Err
ot!t
EoE,
*l
ffiJ.IEI*J
t{ffiIffi'l5ffi#i
dffit
r:'tt"l*I; +'l
Hfl,JI
-tr44it11
lfrr:*
r't,ii':
i-,;'tt
:1T'lE
l'i:l{
',,::,ffa il',1- .i[
'. :i;{
tiit
l!:Jh#
:ll,iLi
-']l,ri;li .|ilL'(
I/UrirJr
i.iii=!,:."ni
,'qr3ir"i1,,I"c,,";.
-:sO",,"1.j",&,li;,,
r:;lti:,.;W),Y/r^ilI I ><
QVN I €i;48[,*iEr
i'H.;+
i
5.{
{5
d
\3
i:9 I'::'.lG i:!:r:i]r:f ;f"*TTa'rT*!i...!-JZT.'.{[I
arl'*- .,tl'.
{.;l:r$'?8,, .:.,
..-,3..
.:r;':'a''
.- lr(L,,t,- __ra.
r^ -fl[:
I .- ' ,
l;:i;
'iE-
:.,h;_-tL:E.,o:tO;.
:;iti,;:l: i ;.,,"..ii4egds
(q
{
\
ilffi
oo-o-o.
)<7
E]n
=t
E
E
€B
I.c.e3.. o
EEE;TBiIara
EBq=
Eloego=E.-=.'F!<EF9Eea,F
xoIL
oEo
o-
t;letolr
ITJa(r
ro'ooaoO
AU'o=ofv art
occLU,o=Yt
)tD
K I
E#-J*"=r."1,':i'iOr;:l
$J4l
',:i.EIilft,,!rl!,1
ffit
.,},.:Jjtil'_{r,:
t^
-SF.\sS sx ',:tsti,4,
'r'".1!l
1l*.@
Y
$'tl'glr::,:i(:.J_"1
riii:;*l#
.:..G::*;€;r;=-:t;."&i
':'' 1l'!;.{j
":' rElrii-.=--. o:.i... o*[',,EI....t4.l" a^
l r '.:--:l.:,,, -:.,":I. -*
I ; r."
tr
Icl
:r
\
(
lt
E'oPa
=()
q-oc
(5
-c()
.oCL
E(5a
(o
*$*$
c\I
-&B
ci lEF l=:
- l-:i
-18EIS.- l(E
-l=Blsrs lpIt+
- ll-<t'olo, I
-l(EI
-luir lclrrlrsl
-lEI
=lol
=l
#l
;--^*,
Io.EPEB"FclEE'ot.&,oor o.rgcBo.qrP5ot
5699PE5p
ElE$
8T*eiiirr;iQENEIF
EFo
E
B-17
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of 1
Time: l3o"t", jr'SurnqbL 5D
Facility tnspector: WoH Chr;z+|, .*c
WeatherConditions: 3 ^n*!, Ua{rn t t,lt'mal.5
SECURITY SYSTEM
Fence lntegrity
Are there breaks in the fence around the HWMF which are
large enough for a person or child to pass through?
Gate Lock
Are the locks missing or damaged?
Posted Warning Signs
Are the signs in place and readable?
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-21
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF Post-Closure lnspection Report
Quarterly lnspection of Site Security
) No (N Reporting?:yes ( ) No (X)
Date: ( -7-0-z_
Answer
Yes or No
r lllDtr
tV10 t r
I U05, *.
Note: R" means that this item is a reporting response; lt means this item requires an immediate response.
lf the Fencelntegrity or Gate Lock questions are answered yes, notify FC immediately, if the posted WarningSigns question is answered no, notify FC immediately. R-ecord any repairs, maintenance or investigatioiactivities and dates conducted:
AMos3-l 5124-CHWMFR-4109-cHWMFlpermit RENEWAL\pERMtrNEw -CAR\AMR2.t .Doc
B-18
March 21, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-22
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure lnspection ReportQuarterly Cover and Evaporation pond Area lnspection
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of2
rime: l35D
lmmediate?: Yes ( ) No ( >C Reporting?: yes ( ) No (K)
Dae: 6-7-OL,
Answer
Yes or No
ty'l0 I R.
IhOla
1 AO ta"
lfnr) lR.
tA0 la.
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
414053-1512{{rm!{F\3-{10}-cEw!.rF\permit Rene},al\peruit\Nex-car\ru,rR22. Doc
B-'t9
Facility lnspector: WlOrcJ 4,l.;z+ l; cb
Weather Conditions: Aur, ^5, War ft\ , IrJ , n/l!
COVER
Are there any trees or shrubs growing onthe cover?
Are there any holes or gullies eroded partially
through the cover larger than 10 square feet?
Are there any holes in the cover which expose
the waste?
Are there any obvious depressions in the cover
surface with setflement of 6 inches or more?
Are there any areas along the perimeter of thecover which show visible signs of seepage?
Are there bunows present large enough to indicatethe presence of large burrowing animils?
Mareh 21, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-22
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
Quarterly Cover and Evaporation pond Area lnspections
Page 2 of 2
General Drainage on Site
ls there ponded water at any location withinthecomptianceboundary? tn7 tA-
EP Drainage Pipes
Are drain pipes to south drainage canal
blocked with debris, sediment or vegetationgrowth? I fiO la.
Are one-way valves on drain pipes stuck orunabletoberotated? lne lR.
Gas Vents
Are vent riser pipes damaged or cracked?rl4O tn.
lf any of the above questions are answered "yes" notify the FC immediately and schedule for maintenance.
Record any activities and maintenance or repairs performed and dates:
a{\ot,<-
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
ar{o53-151211--cm{ur\3-4109-€IfilMF\Permit Renewat\pernit\xew-car\ttG,22 .Doc March 21, 2002
B-20
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-21
POST.CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure lnspection ReportQuarterly lnspection of Site Securitv
Salt Lake City, Utah
page 1 of 1
Da'rl:qt\qP,oL Time:ffiOO
Facility tnspector: froncg ArnU l,,C)o
Weatherconditions: Dat.*t, gu n^ J, tigh t brag-
Yes ( ) No (>C) Reporting?: yes ( ) No ( )q)
Date: Tr/r-Facility
SECURITY SYSTEM
Fence lntegrity
Are there breaks in the fence around the HWMF which arelarge enough for a person or child to pass through?
Gate Lock
Are the locks missing or damaged?
Posted Warning Signs
Are the signs in place and readable?
Answer
Yes or No
lhD u.
t v\a I l"
AMo53-15124-cr-rwMR341O9-cHWMF\permitRENEWAL\PERMrr\NEw_CAR\AMR21.D@
B-21
t Ahra.
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
lf the Fence lntegrity or Gate Lock questions are ansrrered yes, notiff FC immediately, if the posted waming
::?,?i,:ffi'f!jt3::ffit""1rro, notirv rC immediatery nLcord;iny repairs, maintenance or investisation
March 21, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-22
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure lnspection ReportQuarterly Cover and Evaporation pond Area lnspection
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of2
rime: Q$@
Facility lnspector: W . U4.r4.*+ li Ob
$ u,<
Yes (
Answer
Yes or No
ll{1 D 1R*
[ ,4D I R-
Ina I R.
I na ] R*
I l4r; 1R*
oae: 14, Sef , OZ
lmmediate
WeatherConditions: l)a/*1,n5 ,l;qlvc br*sc - SD'?
lruot }f Reporting?:yes( lUoy'f
Date: /zs/o--
COVER
Are there any trees or shrubs growing on
the cover?
Are thgre any holes or gullies eroded partially
through the cover larger than 10 squaie feet?
Are there any holes in the cover which exposethe waste?
Are there any obvious depressions in the cover
surface with setflement of 6 inches or more?
Are there any areas along the perimeter of thecover which show visible signs of seepage?
Are there burrows present targe enough to indicatethe presence of large burrowing animils? I rv O I R.
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
aro53-15124-Clmur\3-4109-GIIWMF\per'it Renewal\pernit\Neer-car\Al,rR22.Doc
B-22
l4are}r 2L, 2OO2
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-22
Quarterly Cover and Evaporation pond Area lnspections
Page2of 2
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
I hrr I R*
I n/r 1
Ilnn 'l
r [^[O t n.
General Drainage on Site
ls there ponded water at any location withinthe compliance boundary?
EP Drainage Pipes
lle lrain pipes to south drainage canalblocked with debris, sediment or vegetationgrowth?
Are one-way valves on drain pipes stuck orunable to be rotated?
Gas Vents
Are vent riser pipes damaged or cracked?
R*
R*
lf any of the above questions are answered "yes" notify the FC immediately and schedule for maintenance.
Record any activities and maintenance or repairs performed and dates:
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response;l* means this item requires an immediate response.
dnA^
$l-r(
AMos3-15124-CIrwlE\3-A10}-CE?|ME\pen.it Renewal\pernit\New_Car\AMR22.Doc Mareh 21, 2002
BP CHWMF POST-CLOSURE PLAN
Form AMR-14
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure tnspection ReportSemi-Annual Groundwater Levei Monitoring
Salt Lake City, Utah
oate: 4,?.?, ?7-
WelllD Elevation
Top of PVC
feet)
Page 1 of 2
rime: l SOC:
Facility lnspector: W\ dyf i l+l;-b
Weather Conditions:
Yes No
Date:7"5/dz/-
Measured Depth Groundwater
to Water Elevation(feet) (feet)
lo.,*t(, - - -c/?Dq.?l
g.qt'
fi.€|-
-
qirc,u\Z.q3 \- LlztS,s?
g-.7E
--
tlzoc|,31
q.56
-
q?o1,31?l . Ol
-
U?_IO ,O7 .na 'i uo t tg
t: .>5 # iiic.4t
L4e tftz
-
\\Retec-saluake\Projects\AMo53-15124 CHWMF\3-4109 cHWMflpermit Renewat\pERMmNEW-cAR\AMR14.DocMarch 21, 2002
I*+
EE+
*
z3l
s-16
s-21
s-22
s-23
s-26
s-31
s-32
s-33
RD-3
RD-4
WQ-1
WQ-2
WQ-3
WQ-4
WQ.5
TN-1A
TN.1B
TN-1C
TN.2A
TN.2B
TN-2C
TN-3A
4219.67
4213.14
4213.43
4211.78
4212.A0
4219.45
4219.13
4219.26
4218.50
4215.39
v214.06
4213.97
4214.08
4214.88
4214.89
4213.46
4213.78
4213.98
4212.83
4212.80
4212.86
4212.67
TotalDepth
of Well
(feet)
23.3
22.6
10.5
7.9
22.5
25.0
25.0
25.4
120.0
120.0
44.6
44.3
44.7
44.9
44.4
26.2
41.3
60.9
25.7
40.1
61.4
25.6
7.qt .!zo?, t7
4 -fr ctz,ol,a1
3.<Z Y zoe.qYttztt.ol
Measure water levels in allwells listed.
B-24
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-14
WelllD Elevation
Top of PVC
(feet)
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
Semi-Annual Groundwater Level Monitoring
TN-38
TN-3C
TN-4A
TN-48
TN-4C
TN-5A
TN-s8
TN-5C
SG-1 *
SG-2 *
4212.89
4212.90
4213.28
4213.18
4213.44
4212.90
4212.88
4212.92
4210.50 **
4209.74**
TotalDepth
of Well
(feet)
40.6
60.9
25.4
40.7
61.4
25.9
39.6
60.5
Page2 ot 2
Measured Depth
to Water
(feet)
z.ot
t, 5)?-441.74
1.3(,i. lz-t.lrtlo.w
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)
4tto'oYttLll.jl
Q col .lo
L{Lil.71
''lL'L'oAu Lc.?| .7(il7tt.vY
uuT.LY
\\Retec-salUake\Projects\AMO53 -15 1 24
March 21, 2002
$n$c
cHwMn3-4109 Renewal\PERMmN EW-CAR\AM R14. DOC
M
B-25
Measured D_!_stance to Water Surface Water Elevation (ft)
ffihvq<-a@^Onr->44--l:a q'w,6,1/
Answer the followino questions to determine adequacy of svstem oerformance
Answer
Yes or No
Evaluate groundwater flow directions. Are there
fewer than three monitoring wells downgradient
of the facility?r do rn.
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; t* means this item requires an immediate response.
lf any question has been answered in the affirmative, notify the FC immediately.
Record any maintenance or repairs performed and the dates.
* SG-1 and SG-2 are stream gauges in the Drain Canal.** Elevation of top of gauge.
CHWMflPermit
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-15
4,q-
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure Inspection Report
Annual Monitor Well lntegrity Tests
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of 3
rime: lj O Ooate: E,Scp. tr?-
Weather Conditions:Warvq,auwn3, braoa4
No( )
Facility lnspector: l/t1 . Chn,bf l;<-b
MONITOR WELL FUNCTION TESTS
Surface Seal lntegrity Test
WelllD
Date: 7/at7u7.
s-16
s-21
s-22
s-23
s-26
s-31
s-32
s-33
WQ-1
WQ-2
WQ-3
WQ4
WQ-5
TN-1A
TN-18
TN-1C
Y'L OnO
^onoy\O
^ov1Of.0t!0*ona
hon0
n0
rtb -n0
p^t/t
Complete these columns only if seal cracking
is visually observed.
Vls_ualsigns tnitial Depth Depth to waterAfter 15 Differenceof seal to water Minutes of water Appried in MeasuredCrackino?- (feet) to SedtatSurface ffeEfl"- -' -'D!p't'hilft) "."'::--1
^tu
Amo53-15124-CHWMF\34109-cHWMRpermit Renewat wat\pERMtr\NEW-CAR\AMRls.Doc
B-26
March 21 , 2002
f<*o to*n lilVt fu rn ftn*6 (Aan o^ oiga6u)
Annual Monitor Well lntegrity Tests
page 2 of 3
Complete these columns only if seal cracking
is visually observed.
Vjs_ual signs rnitiar Depth Depth to water After 1s Differenceof Seal to Water Minutes oiWaterApplied in MeasuredCrackinq? (feet) to Seatat Surface (feet) -Olrtlf"
fnf
Itb
L
ls the difference in measured depthsfor any of the wells greater
than one inch (0.2 ft.)?
MONITOR WELL RESPONSE TESTS
Well !D lnitial Depth Depth to Water After Depth to Water Differenceto Water .... .Removing 0.5 Gallons g iio;rs ffter Between lnitial
-
(feet) of Water lniection and FinalDeoth
i,il ffir",P r,T ,1 ,? - !:trT#5 - i.)71 ,. ..-ioooo +
i.ii ffiYi,z:l-wl, ru ffi'''&
Form AMR-15
Annual Monitor Well lntegrity Tests
Page 3 of 3
lnitial Depth Depth to Water After
Removing 0.5(feet)
wo-1
wo-2
Amo53-15124-CHWMR3-4109-cHWMFlpermit Renewar war\pERMrr\NEW-CAR\AMR15.D@
Difference
Between lnitial
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-15
Well lD
TN-2A
TN.2B
TN.2C
TN.3A
TN.3B
TN.3C
TN4A
TN4B
TN4C
TN-5A
TN-58
TN-5C
'nono
nO
n0
170rto
o0
tAo
Y10n0
mO
rt0
ilhW
J&
''ffi1*t$'tu
and Final Deoth
March21,2002
uv.4.?it-1 u.'c7( /v1
O,+ti -r",v o{o r i "j,a[fr1-C LOS U R E p LAN
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-15
WelllD lnitiatDepth
to Water
(feet)
Annual Monitor Well lntegrity Tests
Page 3 of 3
Depth to Water After Depth to WaterRemoving 0.S Gallons g Fiours After
of Water lniection
Difference
Between lnitial
and Final Deoth
WQ.1
WQ.2
WQ-3
WQ4
WQ-5
TN-1A
TN-18
TN-1C
5'.ta rru-zn
Z.A- TNaB
TN-2C
5.5? ?.w6.S6 i. b5
Ll- ot b.zt4.73 b.cL3.Lrb 5.'Iq{.*.55 $.trt
u- cttt ,.ort/-l - D4 L. 13$*q =6e €#tSe"s-9a".+.=*tsE!+g"Sz s.qi[rez+-e t.Q.- 1.p1
ffi 5.q5Wqrt+\,&-_llz
,arc/t4-#l.t4j.##-l,.LtZ
flt*- j:lz-l, t't,
0.ol Yt
0.09 ++
6.o I 9+
6.os {+-
0.oS t+
b,oo ir
O,l'l rr
O,ob k
o.oL rr
o.lY tl
o.lo rt
O.oO I
O.ct Prb,oc, e+ ---/'
5-. 5$
l,bl
t+.0Lq74
1,stbsf
+.+i{tt,rr,l
6r'.6+ qra-
7.qL
TN4A
TN-4B
TN-4C
TN-5A
TN-5B
TN-5C
3.q$t.7 q
\iy
J:bV
5. qz
5 .5L1
A.Ll (*
D .17
24L
OOV 14
o,ob C-f
o.oa) +.1
o.ol a?
O.o o ?ltlvV€6.Ft
o-<tk J ls the difference in measured depths
after 8 hours for any of the wells\w;I"":,:,T:f iilSilJJ[.'1:Y.,';$,fL
Note any wells that need surface seal maintenance or redevelopment. Report to FC and schedule maintenance.Record activities and any repairs or maintenance performed and'dates:
,'4t4{
t-/,r.
Amo5!151244FfwMFtri{1O9-CHWMF\permit Renewar war\pERMrr\NEW-CAR\AMRls.D@
B-28
March21,2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-16
POST.CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF post-Closure lnspection ReportAnnual Monitor Well Sediment inspection
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of2
rime: laOO
lnstalled
TotalDepth
of Well
(feet)
23.3
22.6
10.5
7.9
22.5
25.0
25.0
25.4
120.O
120.0
44.6
44.3
44.7
44.9
44.4
26.2
41.3
60.9
25.7
40.1
61.4
25.6
Uo.b
No(
Cunent
Measured Depth
to Bottom
(feet)
Difference Between
lnstalled and Current Depth
to Bottom
(feet)
{t
' or,", 1f tl f 'z
s-16
s-21
s-22
s-23
s-26
s-31
s-32
s-33
RD-3
RD.4
WQ.1
WQ-2
WQ-3
WQ-4
WQ-5
TN-1A
TN-18
TN-1C
TN-2A
TN-28
TN-2C
TN-3A
lo-
6.0o.o
o.o
o,o
O.o.?
25.t4 a.o%;'Vt>T---- o. o
,12
,.q
,.D
o
.3.5
.Lla
2.5hq2,5,5.2,,,o
+.
L\zIt
7
z
"-7
O.o
L+& t- O.l!cf,] +--p.o
Uq.tl >-- O-34q-1
-
e,et4rr.I o,>
qr-L - v. ILl ,-.D----O.z
W4<-- O,a
Z S,L---_6. r
1S.l
-
6. olrlq O' o
oate: 6,5r{t,02
Facirity tnspector: fu^qa"ffi l,dO
Well lD Elevation
Top of pVC
(feet)
4219.45
4213.14
4213.43
4211.78
4212.00
4219.45
4219.13
4219.26
4218.50
4215.39
4214.06
4213.97
4214.08
4214.88
4214.89
4213.46
4213.78
4213.98
4212.83
4212.80
4212.86
4212.67
Measure depth to bottom in allwells listed.
\\Retec-saltlake\Projects\AMC63-15124- CHWMF\34109 -- cHwMRpermit Reneraat\pERMtr\NEW-cAR\AMR16.Doc March 25, 2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-16
WelllD Elevation
Top of PVC_ (feet)
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
Answer Yes or No
lnstalled
TotalDepth
of Well
(feet)
40.6
60.9
25.4
40.7
61.4
25.9
39.6
60.5
Annual Monitor Well Sediment lnspection
Page2 of 2
Cunent Difference Between
Measured Depth lnstalled and Current Depth
to Bottom to Bottom(feet) (feet)
TN-3B
TN-3C
TN4A
TN-4B
TN-4C
TN-5A
TN-58
TN-5C
4212.89
4212.90
4213.28
4213.18
4213.44
4212.90
4212.88
42',12.92
(-.q-.4-b-t4-g4.5
L.tO ,
9.s40.trl- t
zE.
3 et,
leO.
0.{
O-o
O.Oa,t
O. o_-------4rtt
0.o
o.a
Do any of these wells have a measured depth to the bottom
of the well 2 feet or more higher than the installed depth?tL)ol
lf more than 2 feet of sediment has accumulated in the monitoring wells, notify the FC and schedule for maintenance.
ur,Pry-
\Ul,etec-saltlakeProjec{s\AMC63-15124 - CHWMR:i4109 - CH\ /tvlnPermit Renewa|\PERMIT\NEW-CAR\AMR16.DOC March 25, 2002
Kfbli^d 0^p wA-b
___/
WELL NO.: tr.l&->
DATE:5t5.-p,OL -
TIME STARTED: lZoo
FINISHED: l+oO
3];??j 0.lbt-t= ls.n+ U = iZ.R c.c,\\a-r1oar tu\!^WiA.S+
€;*pd#ffiffi#1 ffiiw#lit"tx
Evacuation Method:
BP CHWMF
SEMI ANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
Measurement Summary:
Datum:{ac-
Depth to Water: {r.86
Totaldepth. qLt.3
Water column length:
Water column volume:
FinalpH:
--pin3l$Q.-
FinalTemp.:
-7
Other:
-
Sample App6arance:Uca,f
(tlor*a**plivt.o^.Y*hcodo{<i
Time
l<ts
w5
pH
k5775
scX}: remp'f
trt_oW
lqza0
Volume
Evacuated Comments
w.zq
a b.57
?r1.5q7
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample bottles:
ldentification : ba$qo.^t parameter:
dN,,b.qzUopl5 \toc
Cr No.: j
I
lnstruments:
AMo053-l 51 24-CHWMR341 O9-cHWMFpermit Renewat\pERMtrcHWMFLoc.Doc
B-31
l\^.tgr, V,fu -r, ,, . Carior#on standards: V,lo, 14sc^.t,w c;i[;;ti;;;ffiil : ro,ooo
|V?l"r level meter: [J<-rav- - Corfbction factor:
-uaflDratton tme: oqw
aw**
March22,2OO2
v l.,---Jq LU t vt t. ,
- {c*pl5L)f A
BP CHWMF
SEMI ANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT NO]
PERSONNEL:
Measurement Summary:
Datum:(oO
Depth to Water: 6.q+Totaldepth: 4tl.5
WELL No.: UA,' I
DATE: 4- 5-oZ
TIME STARTED: i u.lA
FINISHED: 15fgi'ISZD
tfrAa--
= b3q+b= lZ.3S
Sample Appearance : C,l,ea / r S<)tout, eQ".*an l
Water column length:
Water column volume:
36.7 j KO'ttrt4
lZ,j$4""1
i;i+ffiffffiffi,9re,*lt;ws,%L:ui;{it**t"1,;ffiTi!,;,*rt
Evacuation Method: r._oLt{ tout
Time pH sc KZ remp IllH5,"o comments,*,.,_ ru tGs3a z1.q l*6.5+=rF-'*o-ZZ !,Jen )r3
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample boftles:
No.: 3
I
SC meter:
Calibration time: p bj; 5
AMo053-'l 51 24-CHWMF\3{1 09-CHWMFpermit Rener^rar\pERMrrcHWMFLoc.Doc
B-32
Calibration standards: 7. to,,aCalibration standard , lb,OAOCorrection factor:
'Wot*
v4<-lo,J4I-,ldentification: L.tAZ*<cLtoqt-.parameter: yOC_wl<_g$ Eztapt, T
lnstruments:
pH meter:
March 22,2002
BP CHWMF
SEMI ANNUAL WATER QUALIW SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
cLlENr: {3 P
LOCATION:
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL:
Measurement Summary:
Datum: Tac
Depth to Water: 1O -Ltte
Totatdepth: Z-5.3
Watercolumntength: lz.qq X0,?q= 10. t4Watercolumn volume: 10. I 4,K = $6. u1
FinalpH: ..-
FinalSC:
-FinalTemp.:
-
Sample Appearance : C I e-a,r
Volume
Evacuated Comments
WELL NO.: 9-lr.
DATE: 1-I..OL-
TIME STARTED: 0grf
FINISHED: OqLS
v,w'[ff#w:#"ri,rtf ::t\i:'fr;":,:|Zl/J"T::y,,Ay:,i:*3:#;r
Evacuation Method: rcal i (lovt
Time
o#aa3e
pH
(".\(ldz
SC
lzl3ow
Temp
Wo.4
lrL.l.
15. Zr
nr.L{
(-zl<.at
OL+a/
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample boftles:
ldentification 40 nl
5a;$t1 Parameter: \l t{/T No.: zG
I
lnstruments:
pH meter: l^f r^a/o .scmeter. F
W?l"r tevetm6tdr: +t lt-.a.
Calibration time: qt
-
01 z5
Calibration standards: 7, tO,4Calibration standard :
Correction rictoi; )o, 0o D
rnl-
AMo053-1 51 24-CHWMF\3-41 og-cHWMFpermit Renewar\pERMrrcHWMFLoc.Doc
B-33
ql"l*
March22,2002
BP CHWMF
SEMI ANNUAL WATER QUALIW SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
g\tF\r, bP 4r, c
l994]r_o]:, =LA?m? -ll91E9r No.: ta tuLo'71 - /r1rl
PERSONNEL: l|r.( , CG,
Measurement Summary:
Datum: fcz
Depth to Water: 4,OlTotaldepth: ht1q
Water column length: 4 O.>q .f, O.
WELL NO.: 1,^.rQ-3DATE: 1<-oz
TIME STARTED: O1\O
FINISHED: IO 5g
llrtl = L. (r>r(, = IZ.UZ
x3= J}.gt
Sample Appearance:Uca
.Samplingsummary: Prnnali*_uot,*-n;,n,i+tr^ rl;{lort Punp O*lqaV*in friarloe,(ll^X'=3fr"MgrnTffi;i-7*iiirfi';'i,ltrf,"{ii:lT$^do{ *a^'tti'a' tua*,t''*'""op)'na
Other:
Evacuation Method: ful t{t o*
Time
lo lqloil glrZo
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample bottles:
ldentification: l,l2nl
Fl,a9ol\
lnstruments:
pH meter:
SC meter:
Temp
Parameter: VoL,J=/
Volume
Evacuated Comments
l"$.qZ C,tat, rctloutLz:r
bt.7
No.: )
I'
Water level mEter: ltr,ran
Calibration time: OAZg
AMo053-1 51 24-CHWMF\3-41 09-cHWMFpermit Renewat\pERMlrcHWMFLoG.Doc
B-34
Galibration stiandards: T,10,t l
Calibration standard : l0,0OO
Correction factor:
Water column volume: I Z.kzqal
FinalPH'
-
- '
AW
March22,2002
BP CHWMF
SEMI ANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
CLIENT:
LOCAT]ON:
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL:
Measurement Summary:
Datum:Aoc-
Depth to Water: 4.?3Totaldepth: q4.q
WELL No.: (^/A- H
DATE: 1-l,r'OZ
TIME STARTEO: I A 5{ IL45
FINISHED: ljEA
Time pH
7-aV.2-lo
sc xz
]fl1tutq17o
I lnqo lt.5A+ b= t2.56
Sample Appearance: Q 6,av, rtr<_l lo",
Temp
Volume
Evacuated Comments
Lz.z
bt.q
I\?D
l3rta Clcarcl ear
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample bottles:
ldentification:. 40ru.,
$oo Pat3
Parameter: \to(d No.: f
I
lnstruments:
pH meter:Calibration standards: 7, lO, 4Calibration standard : lo,g')t)
Correction factor:
Water column length: 4O,tAyO.Water column volumel2- b=$6o I
Final Temp. | ----=
Wffi;f# ,i#";vtrs'iTZtr!fr,;?qv
Evacuation Method: r-tli{ 1 arrl
1s,6?
=
oklJ l?loL w'l)-
AMo053-'l 51 24-cHwMR341 og-cHwMFpermit Renewar\pERMrrcHWMFLoc.Doc
B-35
March22,2002
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
PROJECT NO.:
PERSONNEL:
Measurement Summary:
Datum: Teo
Depth to Water:3, {re
Total depth:a/4.I
Water cotumn tength: 4o .Uq *O. LtA. U,bL +lo=- ll-..tsL?Water cotumn votume: IZ.VL j; .a3 -FinalpH:
-
Sample Appearance:Cla,-FinalSC:
Other:
pH
735
.
SC
$017Cw
Temp
bs-q
=
Parameter:(t
BP CHWMF
SEMIANNUAL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
FIELD LOG
WELL NO.: &;&- 5
DATE: ol-t"-Oz-
TIMESTARTED: I4oO
FINISHED: 150O
Sampling Summary:
Sampting Method: (bt t ( lop
Evacuation Method: telt f I out
Time
l4?plfre-
Total gallons evacuated:
Sample bottles:
ldentification: 4O,-t-
?"'?"b
lnstruments:
Calibration time: gg7$
Volume
Evacuated Comments
Ola,rC-lq,r
No.: 3
I
Calibration standards: 7, tO "lCalibration standard : lO,O7tO
Correction factor'.
-
pH meter:
C 1,",/, ?/z/ru fi/?t/
AMoo53-1 5'l 24-CHWMF\3-41 O9-CHWMFpermit Renewat\pERMlrcHWMFLOG.Doc
B-36
March22,2002
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-31
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF Post-Closure lnspection Report
Evaluation of Results of Semi-Annual
Groundwater Detection Monitoring
Page 1 of 1
Date: ?/z"l /ou Time: /0:1il**-
/14^rl- L0,,as lcL
?/;/"2 - Q/(/ot-
lmmediate?: Yes (I ruo(X)
Date: ?7,t1t,2-
Examine laboratory analytical report forms. Do the results from any of the sampledcompliance point wells (Wells WQ-.1 through WO-s) gqua(or exceed the followingconcentration Limits for the indicated parrmJters: rves(1)-
Facility lnspector:
Date of Sampling:
Parameter Concentration Limit
0/t)
1,1 Dichloroethane 5
1,1 Dichloroethylene sChloroform s
1,1,1 Trichloroethane 5
Carbon Tetrachloride 5Benzene sToluene sEthylbenzene s
Xylene, Total sChromium SO
lf yes, indicate well number and concentration reported and notify the FC immediately.
lf yes, followthe procedures of Section 2.2 ofthe Post-Closure Care and Monitoring plan.
lf no, attach laboratory report sheets and file.
\\Retec-saltlake\Projects!AMC63-,t5124 CHWMF\34109 _
March 21,2002
B-37
'dL
CHWM FlPermit Renewa t\PE RM tT\N EW-CAR\AMR3 1 . DoC
oo3
ETotrItt.>otr
r0
!o.=oa)o
CE
oahl
o
+
o
3
s\l{
F
OoJ q
\
\8 Z I S t C ? I sald
*
{c 4 9 5 t U Z I -Ee/d
o
-9o3
IDs
.goorLa
6
co
E
Eoo
8 I 9 S I C Z I ',srrd
u I I 5 t E Z I -'ard
I I I 5 t 6 ? I re,d
oE
tr
EZ95
a ! I s t a z I '6erd
o
(EoI 4 I S r e Z I ',rord
c4999EZt-SeJd
ro
Eo
.9,3t'
._tro
cc
-fi)
aa9stc?l sord20^n Y\
L.,:
Tr
N f.
aa99tEat sar.
s.leupluoc lo JsqunN I II
gt
t'l
,{3
at,
=oo
E(Ua
\
.tI
NS
.9o
c(Uo
Eoc)
x
6
=
eseqd-g1ny1 ra-ia -
prnbrl oue0:6
snoenby x x )t o.:oeooo
(L
9c,eE
+gaE-HHe0()rlz-.zzol,i;+;;i;
p!tos
otto:oooE,
(
(
\
I\
I epodruog
qEJ9 x x x x
Itoofo
\L
ss
Q
id
E(!z
o0)'0
(L
\oI
ozii(D
0(L
1'
e€troF6o
ot6
asc sI
h
so
otr
t,trto
Gc
:l
U'
oo
EItr
ol(6l lPl tlHI EI6l El
?*
EE+3
EE*E
EsEEr?Ec
eI EE>ErE &o id6!dUcEiE
F ce i
F;;E
Eog6(sooE()
r(
G
${
d
Glst
J
Ns
J
sl
co
oo
c(,Eg
o.
E6o
f:
Ie')
st(
rc
tq
?
Id
o
E V.
\
o6o
,\a\
J
o
G
E
o
;oa!
oo
Po
ooo!c
=(U
E
IIJ
ii
o
o-
;<'(EtL
oo0)
!E
otC'
.9ttr
.soG
t
\
i
s
)
N (,t 6 (o N Co o o N c)
t, i-o:6.9
= lJ-Oi;o5
i- L/
O ,rnC,E
=(dtrc(6<'a
,iltrlE
^t*
EIB
FI$ E
;lg €o I; s
EIi E
q15 *EIi E
5l{ iOl-E #
=ls s
.,si: l3
€iiii
l*
B-38
oo
CToEpo.>Gt
oEo
o(,otr
oEF
c!
au
+
o
=
gcqil
OoJ
dcf{\\
I Z I I t C Z I ',6ard
8 Z 9 I r C Z | ',sard
oco
o
=os
-g(.,
G)q.oo
tro)
EE
oo
0 I e E r t z |lali
8 ! 9 I I e z t seta
a I I S t E Z I sard
I / 9 S ' C Z r ',sord
a / 9 I t e ? | aord
o
G(f,0l9qrEZr',3eri
g ! g s , t z I rcld
lotoEo
CIc
oE
6
!,o.:oooE
J')!x ((I Z 9 I ' e E|lrvserdaQ^x x X (I r. gLEy 0 z(\'8e,d
sraursluoS lo.taqunN s '$\f,
,T\
a-t
;
E
-9o
E(U
U)
!{
{
"6
Nu
N\\lrE
.o
a
coo
Eoo
x
G
=
esBqd-ilnw
plnbn queoro
snoanbv x lv x o)
oaooo
o.
??oc; -d __N+e8toQ*e?TTT:11?
p!tos
\
;
T
=,J-
g
)
oo epodurog
qBJE Y x x
+
0,o3a
\Ls3*I<--
a;E(Uz
oo0o-
+o
o-
oz
oo'5'
o-
I'
E€EOroo s tr
M
\,tng
trss
o
E
1-t,tr
o
6c
f
a
oo
EItr
ol
(UI!l .-
El 3,Dl cEl
P
5
.2
sI)E
it8::E
;;
!!!E
dg
sgE;
t;
Eet6 rl)oEo fi(r
c(
(t
J
il
+
Ns
$
tro
6(,
iicoE
-ga.
E6o
s
I
\
N
I
U
3
{
6
IT
Ie
3
o
EF v*
o6o
La-
ut,t^
tro
IEtr
Lc
E
oG
oo
p
atEoo,o(r
:(U
E
LrJ
oco
o.
x(U
LL
oao)
DT'
o
1'o
oEutr5o(
l
ilv
il
(\l (r,!t 6 ol N @ o)o N ('
'if a
6o:l tro6
:b g
,L-\J
rE#io .eoQ:-i=(diEC#<
Il@lo,l(\t
Ito
icrt
I
I
I
I
I
I
@N
I
N:o
,tE
9s
ir@EEoa
{O@E5d
o€
JE;ib,.l
= iriOEot83
=
oE
B-39
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-21
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
BP Closed HWMF Post-Closure lnspection Report
Quarterly lnspection of Site Security
Salt Lake City, Utah
Page 1 of 1
Time: i 3 c'0
Answer
Yes or No
ri4C) t t.
t,nD tr
R*
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l" means this item requires an immediate response.
lf the Fence lntegrity or Gate Lock questions are answered yes, notify FC immediately, if the Posted Waming
Signs question '6 ahswered no, notity fC immediately. Record any repairs, maintenance or investigation
activities and dates conducted:
AMO53-151 24-CHWMFE{I OS.CHWMRPCTMiI RENEWAL\PERMIT\T'IEW 'CAR\AMR21 .DOC
840
Facilig lnspector: W1 c*Aa
Weather conditions: Lod, (.61c., y,Ag, y6ri ablc b;cz.Z'(
lmmediale?:Yes ( I ruo (XJ Reporting?:Yes ( ) No ()Q
Date: t/?/u>
SECURITY SYSTEM
Fence lntegrity
Are there breaks in the fence around the HWMF which are
large enough for a person or child to pass through?
Gate Lock
Are the locks missing or damaged?
Posted Warning Signs
Are the signs in place and readable?
'ut7
March?1,2002
dH
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-22
BP Closed HWMF Post-Closure lnspection ReportQuarterly Cover and Evaporation pond Area lnspection
Salt Lake City, Utah
&l Date: {
Facility I nspector:'rU\e*oo,,
Weather Conditions: C-a bl,
Approved:7
Facility
Page 1 of2
Time: lTocl
Answer
Yes or No
l?1Dtn.
I^O tR.
r /40 I n.
I ,.Ifl I R-
I t1c) I R.
f. c trruvl,X, vt"v'iarbl. br"c,fr-,
r?: Yes ( ) No (X) Reporting?: ""#i" Q(
Date: l/1/Zcr&3
COVER
Are there any trees or shrubs growing on
the cover?
Are there any holes or gullies eroded partially
through the cover larger than 10 square feet?
Are there any holes in the cover which expose
the waste?
Are there any obvious depressions in the coversurface with setflement of 6 inches or more?
Are there any areas along the perimeter of thecover which show visible signs of seepage?
Are there burows present large enough to indicatethe presence of large burrowing animils? t lA () | A"
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
aMos 3 -1 5 1 2 {-cI{wME\ 3 - 4 1 0 9-crrIrME \ perBi t Renewar \penoi t\Nen-car\Al*{R2 2 . Doc
841
Marc}r 2L, 2OO2
Form AMR-22
Quarterly Cover and Evaporation Pond Area lnspbctions
Page? of 2
RUN-ON RUN-OFF CONTROL STRUCTURES
General Drainage on Site
ls there ponded water at any location within
the compliance boundary?t na I R.
EP Drainage Pipes
Are drain pipes to south drainage canal
blocked with debris, sediment or vegetationgrowth? t i,a (2 I R.
Are one-way valves on drain pipes stuck orunabletoberotated? tl,10lR.
Gas Vents
Are vent riser pipes damaged or cracked?lffU la-
lf any of the above questions are answered "yes" notify the FC immediately and schedule for maintenance.
Record any activities and maintenance or repairs performed and dates:
Note: R* means that this item is a reporting response; l* means this item requires an immediate response.
ArdoS3-1S12lt-CH$rMA\3-410HEWMA\PerDit Renewal\Pernit\Nerr-qar\Al.IR22.Doc t'tarch 21, 2002
B,42
Appendix C
2002 Trai n i ng Documentation
BP CHWMF
Form AMR-41
POST-CLOSURE PLAN
The following personnel have reviewed the post-closure plan and applicable operations
that are scheduled to occurduring the period of January 1, ZooL,to December3l,'?po?- . Training consisted of verbal review and classroom instructions.on the foltowing
subjects:
a.
b.
c.
d.
A
f.
g.
G roundwater monitoring req uirements.
lnspection and reporting requirements.
Maintenance requirements.
Contingency Plan
Security
Pertinent BP and osHA Health and safety Regulations
General requirements of the permit for the CHWMF.
'*Y,i:;fl|1':J- q4,^.r?.{^7*
Alternate Facility Coord inator.,/ z'6\L{J\5-- K-n-r \*-.,^)
Alternate f acltity Coord inator
Date
3/zrloz-
Date2.5 a^,agL\ Otz-
Date
Date
L5,nry^r,0L
Date
Z5-- /u\A ' aDoL
Date
lMarc,l (rh,r,y! l;eb
( i- ,r'A Gfrrt
AMSCPO63\PERMIT\NEWCARIAMR41 .DOC
c-1
March22,2OO2
Appendix D
2oo2Groundwater Analyticar Data and
Data Validation Reports
&mmfyfi*m6 Wwp*# Sff1645 West220OSouth . SaltlakeCiry,Utah 84ltg . 800-973_6724
4pri122,2002
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 Wesr 200 South
suite 2006
Salt Lake City, Uf g4l0l
(801) 3s9-30s9 Fax: (801) 3Sg-3307
Project: Bp Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: AM07Z_LS7t7_722
Dear Mr. Mark Roeinske.
Work Order: 020403g
PurchaseOrder: ANl072_15717_722
Thank you for using Mountain States Anaryticar,Inc. (MSAr) as your environmentarinformation resource. our reports *" Gignro io *."i trrrZrrtified Laboratory ReportingRequirements of utah Administrati"" c"a"r.+++-14.lriil;-Jnd the National EnvironmentalLaboratory Accreditation program C*ri*1, Section 5.13.
This is Report Number 0204038-1 and contains 25 pages of information for the 7 samplessubmitted to MSAI on wednesd"y, epriio: ,2002.' A;;;-pi, receipt documentation detailedin the work order Receipt s"**u.y Ir-t,is repo.t (;.;., dd:of_custody, work orderAuthorization, etc') and/or analyici .*ri" ooi.o u, ;r""-unu.rr"d ,, are included by referenceas attachments following pug is. For regulato.y "o*pii*"I ,"p".r*g, individual pages orportions of this report *uy"ot t.,"p*uilO.
If you have any questions-r-egarding the information contained in this report, please feel free tocontact me at [phone] ext. i}zaor by "-rnail ;d"rr*@msailabs.com.
Mountain States Analytical, Inc.{-Pefu
Rolf E. Larsen
Senior Proiect Manager
D-1
&maxtytier*d ffiepmr* ffi o
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Prqiect: BP Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: ANl072-15717-722
Lab Sample ID Ctient Sample ID
1645 West 2200 South . Saltl_ake Ciry, Uiah 841 19 800-973-6724
Sample Summary
Additional Sample Information
Report Number:
Date Reported:
WorkOrder:
0204038-t
04/22/02
02M038
Matrix Date Collected
0204038-0lA
0204038-0IB
0204038-02A
0204038-028
0204038-034
0204038-038
0204038-04A
0204038-048
0204038-05A
02M038-058
0204038-06A,
0204038-068
02M038-07A
wQ-3
wQ-3
wQ-2
wQ-2
wQ{
wQ-6
EQB
EQB
wQ-l
wQ-l
s-I6
s-r6
Trip Blank
Groundwater
Groundwa!er
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Water
04t02/02
04t02/02
04t02t02
04/02t02
04t02t02
04/02t02
04/02t02
04102t02
04/02t02
04/02t02
04102/02
04to2t02
04/02/02
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-2
ffir.xw#grfrmcxf ffimp*# We
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Bp Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: ANI072-L57tl--722
Sample ID Client Sample ID
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 .800-9734724
Holding Time Summary
ReportNumber:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
0204038-l
04/22/02
0204038
Date Collected
0204038-0lA
Parameter
Metals by hrlCp
Leachate
Start Date End Date
wQ-3
HT Prep Date
04/09t02 t0:00
04/02/02 09:30
HT Analysis Date HT
04/09t02 2t:38 180
0204038-0lB
Parameter
wQ-3
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
04/02/0209:30
HT Analysis Date HT
04il5t02 30
04116/0201:56 t4
0204038-02A
Parameter
Metals by hrlCp
Leachate
Start Date End Date
wQ-2
HT Prep Date
04109/0210.00
04/0210212:30
Analysis Date HT
04109/02 2t:43 I80
IIT
0204038-028
Parameter
wQ-2
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
04/02/0212:30
HT Analysis Date
o4n6/02
04/1610221.,30
HT
30
t4
0204038-03A
Parameter
Metals by hrlCp
wQ-6 ' Leachate
Start Date End Date lff Prep Date
04/09/02 t0:00
04/02/02 t2:20
HT Analysis Date IIT
04/09/02 2t.48 180
0204038-038
Parameter
wQ-6
Preservarive pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
0204038-04A EQB
Parameter
Leachate
Start Date End Date
Leachate
Start Date End Date
IIT Prep Date
HT Prep Date
04102/02 12:2O
Analysis Date
04/16t02
04/16102 21:57
04/02t02 t2:35
Analysis Date
HT
30
l4
+ - The recommended holding time was exceeded
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compriance
D-3
&wm#sti**t ffiwpu* W O
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: ANIO72-15717-722
Sample ID Client Sample ID
l645West2200south . Saltlakecity,Utah 84llg . 800_973_6724
Holding Time Summary
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
0204038-l
04/22t02
0204038
Date Collected
Metals by hrICP O4/09/0210:00 04109102 2l:53 180
0204038-04B
Parameter
EQB
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date Iff Prep Date
04t02t02 t2:35
ET Analysis Date HT
o4/t5to2 30
0411610200:t2 t4
0204038-05A WQ_l
Parameter
Metals by kICP
Leachate
Start Date End Date IIT Prep Date
O4/09102 t0:00
O4/02/0214:05
ET Analysis Date HT
04109t0221:58 180
0204038-058
Parameter
wQ-l
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
0204038-064 s-16
Parameter
Metals by hrICP
0204038-06B s-16
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date
Leachate
Start Date End Date
Leachate
Start Date End Date
IfT Prep Date HT
O4/02/02 t4:.05
Analysis Date HT
o4/15t02 30
04116102 Ol:.O4 t4
04102/0215,20
Analysis Date HT
04109/0222:03 180
04102102 15:20
Analysis Date HT
0445t02 30
04116102 O0:38 14
III Prep Date
O4/09102 10:00
HT Prep Date
HT
HT
0204038-074 Trip Blank
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
04t02/02
HT Analysis Date HT
04/15t02 30
04115102 23:45 t4
* - The recommended holding time was exceeded
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D4
I 645 West 2200 South . Salt Iake city, utah 84119 . 800_973-6724
ffir,rr w f y*{*m$,ffimp#rt S$&
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work 0rder:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COCID:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salr L,ake ciry, uT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax [phone]
BP Amoco CHWMF
ANtO72-t57 t7 -722
AN[O72-157 t7-722
02M038-l
04t22t02
0204038
02M038-0lA
wQ-3
04102t02
04/03102 O000
Groundwater
24462
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF'Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 3005A:
Prep Batch ID:
Chromium
FIame./hrICP Prep, Water
8603
Metals by hrICP, Water
04109102 10:00
04/09102 21:38
MAM
0.01 0.05 mglL DGW
U - Not detected above rhe MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel,
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-5
I 645 West 2200 South . Satt Lake city, utah 84119 . 8oo-g734724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
salt Lake city, uT 84101
801-359-3059 Farc 801_359_3307Project: Bp Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: ANt072-tS7t7-7Zz
Purchase Order: ANl072-lS7l7-722
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
Date Reported: 04122102
Work Order: 02M038
Lab Sample ID: 02OdOQ8-0lB
Client Sample IO: C'We-+)
DateCollected: 04/02/02
Date Received: 04103/02 00.00
Matrix: Groundwater
COC ID: 24462
Ammdydrmm$ ffimpo* W O
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 J
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatlles, Water
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
100
135
97.5
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
04/t5t02
04/16102 0l:56 CMS
04116102 0l.56 CMS
04116102 0l:56 CMS
O4/16102 0l:56 CMS
04116102 0l:56 CMS
04116102 Ol:56 CMS
04116lo2 0l:56 CMs
04/16102 0t,56 CMS
04116102 0l:56 CMS
04/16102 Ol:56 CMS
04116/02 0l:56 CMS
04116/02 01:56 CMS
CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l, I -Dichloroethane
l, l-Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethaned4
Toluene-d8
Recovery Range
68.1-t24
60.4-138
76.4-t20
ttgL
ItdL
PE/L
pdL
ttdL
pelL
pdL
trdL
pgL
o/o Recovery
7o Recovery
oZ Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel.
t - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-6
I 645 West 2200 South . salt Lake city, utah 84119 . 800-973_6724
&remfyfrmmf $?mpoffi W
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
Date Reported: 04/22102
Work Order:0204038
Lab Sample ID: 02M038-02A
-r
CtientSamplelD( *r,
Date Collectedr \Z:rozoz
Date Received: 04/03102 00:00
Matrix: Groundwater
COC ID: 24462
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake Ciry, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fa* 801-359-3307
BP Amoco CHWMF
ANt072-ts7t7-722
ANt072-15717-722
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sW-slo:oosa:
Prep Batch ID:
SW-846 6010B:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
8603
Metals by hrICP, Water
0.01 0.05 mgtL
04/0910210:00
| 04/0910221:43
MAM
DGW
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Anallte detected below the PeL
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-7
1645 West2200 South . Saltlakecity,Utah B4ttg . 800-973_6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, Ln g4l0l
801-359-3059 Fax: 801-359_3307
Project: Bp Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: AM072-157t7-722
Purchase Order: ANl072-lS717-722
&ww#y*{*mf $Qexp#af Sff O
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID;
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0204038-t
04/22/02
0204038
0204&8-028lw,
04t02t02
04/03102 0O:00
Groundwater
24462
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 J
SW-846 5030B/82608: Votatiles, Water
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l,l -Dichloroethane
l,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, l -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
ToluenedS
0.001
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
Recovery Range
68.t-124
60.4-138
76.+120
ttdL
pelL
ttdL
$clL
ttC/L
ttE/L
pgL
ItgL
YE/L
oZ Recovery
oZ Recovery
o% Recovery
04n6t02
04116/02 2l:30 DJH
04116/0221:30 DJH
Mlt6l022l:30 DJH
04/16/0221:30 DJH
04/16/0221''30 DIH
0411610221:.30 DJH
04116/0221:30 DJH
04/16/0221:30 DJH
04/1610221:30 DIH
04/1610221:30 DJH
0411610221:30 DIH
04/16/0221:30 DJH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DJH
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
96.0
95.5
97.O
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analle detected below the pel.
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presanted for regulatory compliance.
D-8
1645 West2200South . Saltlakecity,Utah 84llg . 800_973_6724
&mw#p*€*mf ffim6*# W
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Iake city, Lrr 8410I
801-359_3059 Fax: 801_359_3307Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: ANl072-157 17 -722
PurchaseOrder: A.J[L/I072-15717-722
>-F
0204038-l
o4t22/02
0204038
0204Q38-03A
rtrad\nr/.
04/0310200:00
Groundwater
24462
J>gt"'
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 30054:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
8603
Metals by hrICP, Water
O4lO9/02 10:00
04/09/02 2l:48
MAM
DGW0.01 0.05 mglL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel-
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individr:al pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-9
&rx*$y€r*mr ffimpn# S$A OClient: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
I75 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Iake Ciry, LIT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801_359_3307
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: ANtO72-tS7t1--722
PurchaseOrder: AM072-15717-'t2Z
.S-$"
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COCID:
0204038-l
04/22/02
0204038
0204038-038/G-)
04102t02
04/03/02 O0:00
Groundwater
24462
1645 Westz200south . Saltlakecity, Utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 l
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
93.7
93. l
96.1
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
04t16tO2
04/16102 2l:57 DIH
0411610221.57 DJH
04116/0221:57 DJH
O41161022l:57 DJH
04116102 2l:57 DJH
O4116/0221:57 DJH
04116102 2l:57 DJH
04116102 2l:57 DJH
04116/02 2l:57 DJH
04/16/02 2l:57 DJH
04/1610221:57 DJH
04/16102 2l:57 DJH
DJH
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I , I -Dichloroethane
I , I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluened8
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-t38
76.4-t20
ItdL
ttdL
pgL
pclL
pgL
ygL
ttgL
ttgL
PEIL
% Recovery
oZ Recovery
7o Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel.
. - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results oueide normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-10
l0
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Ilke Ciry, Utah 84t 19 . 800-923-6724
&wmfy*i#ffig W*W*M W
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COCID:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt L,ake City, UT g4lOl
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
BP Amoco CHWMF
ANI072-157 t7 -722
ANI072-L57 t7 -722
0204038-l
04t22t02
0204038
ry8-o4AIEOB)l_Y04/o2/02
04/03102 00:00
Groundwater
24462
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 30054:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
FIame/hrICP Prep, Water
8603
Metals by hrlCp, Water
04109102 t0:00 MAM
04/0910221:53 DcW0.01 0.05 mgll-
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel,
t - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquanthation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-11
ffimm*3rfl*m& Wwp*# W OClient: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt l^ake Ciry, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax 801-359_3307
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: ANl072-15717-7Zz
PurchaseOrder: ANl072-15717-722
I 645 West 2200 Soutlr . Salt Lake Ciry, Utah B4llg . 800-973-6724
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Makix:
COC ID:
0204038-l
04122t02
0204038
f)2eq{8-o4B( eos')\z04t02t02
04/03/02 00:00
Groundwater
2M62
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 J
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
04lt5t02 CMS
04116102 00:12 CMS
Mll6l0200:12 CMS
0411610200:12 CMS
0411610200:12 CMS
04/16t0200:12 CMS
0411610200:.12 CMS
Mll6l0200:12 CMS
O4lt6lo2 00:12 CMS
O411610200:12 CMS
04/16102 00:12
0411610200:12
04ll6lO2 00:12
CMS
CMS
CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l, I -Dichloroethane
I , l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
ILgL
vgL
pgL
ItCIL
ttClL
ttgL
ttgL
ttdL
pgL
oZ Recovery
7o Recovery
7o Recovery
98.5
127
103
Recovery Range
68.1-t24
60.4-138
76.4-120
U - Not detected above the MDL
I - Analye detected below the pel-
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-12
t2
ffinm$p#fmef ffi*p*M Wg
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, Lrf 84101
801-359-3059 Far 801-359-3307
BP Amoco CHWMF
ANt072-157t7-722
4M072-15717-722
1645 west22o0South . saltlakecity,utah 84t1g . 800-973_6724
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COCID:
0204038-l
04t22t02
02M038
yM\8.os^(v
o4t02t02
O4l03l02OO:O0
Groundwater
24462
Parameter Result MDL PQL Unih Date AnalyzedDF Analyst
SW-846 3005A: Flame/hrlCp prep, Water
Prep Batch ID: 8603
SW-846 60108: Metals by hrlCp, Water
Chromium
041O9/02 10:00
04109102 2l:58
MAM
DGW0.0r 0.05 mgtL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel.
t - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
l3
lndividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-13
&rtmsylrr*mj ffi*p*rf ,Sfle ,oI 645 West 2200 south . Salt t-ake city, utah g4llg , 800_973-6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake Ciry, UT g4l0l
801-359-3059 Far 801-359_3307
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: AN[072-15717-1.2Z
PurchaseOrder: AM072-l5ill-722
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
Date Reported: 04/22/02
Work Order: 0204038
Lab Sample ID: 0204038-058
ctient sampte ro, @
Date Collected: 04/02102
DateReceived: 04/03/0200:00
Matrix: Groundwater
COC ID: 24462
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH e I
SW-846 50308/8260B: Votatiles, Water
0.001
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-120
04n5to2 cMS
04116102OlM CMS
04/1610201:M CMS
04116/02 0l:04 CMS
Mll6/0201:04 CMS
04116lo2 }l:.M CMS
04/16102 0l:O4 CMS
04116102 0l:04 CMS
04116/02 0l:04 CMS
04/16lo2 0l:04 CMS
04116/02 0l:.O4 CMS
04/16102 0l:04 CMS
04116102 0l:04 CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l, I -Dichloroethane
l, I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluoroberzene
1,2-Dichloroethaned4
Toluene-d8
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
ttdL
pe/L
ItC/L
ltdL
pelL
t!ClL
ttdL
ttClL
ttElL
o/o Recovery
oZ Recovery
o/o Recovery
t02
136
98.6
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PeL
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-14
t4
Sram$yxmmf ffi-mpu# W
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
1645 West 2200 Souttr . Salt Lake City, Utah 800-973-6724
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt [ake City, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
BP Amoco CffWMF
4M072-t57t7-722
4M072-ts7t7-722
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COCID:
0204038-l
04t22t02
0204038
0294038-06A
^,1)l-Z
04t02102
04103102 00:00
Groundwater
24462
Parameter PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
SW-846 30054: FlamdhrlCp prep, Water
Prep Batch ID: 8603
SW-846 60108: Metals by hrlCp, Water
Chromium
0410910210:00 MAM
0410910222:03 DGW0.05 mgL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-l5
l5
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah g4l1g . EOO-I73_6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
suite 2006
Salt Iake ciry, uT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801_359_3307
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: ANl}7Z-lSl17-722
PurchaseOrder: ANIO72-15717-722
,4mmfpfr*mt ffimp*# Sff O
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0204038-l
Mt22t02
0204038
02M038-068,,1=\w
04/02/02
0410310200:00
Groundwater
24462
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 J
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l, l -Dichloroethane
l, I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
1, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
0.00r I
I
I
I't
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
041r5/o2
04116102 00:38 CMS
O4116/02 00:38 CMS
04116/02 00:38 CMs
O4116102 00:38 CMS
O4116/02 00:38 CMS
04/16102 00:38 CMS
04116/02 00:38 CMS
04116/02 00:38 CMS
O4/16/02 00:38 CMS
O4116102 00:38 CMS
04116/02 O0:38 CMS
04116102 00:38 CMS
CMS
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
98.2
130
99.8
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
Recovery Range
68.1-t24
60.4-138
76.4-120
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
pdL
pdL
pdL
ttElL
ttgL
pgL
ttgL
ttgL
trgL
% Recovery
% Recovery
7o Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel,
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or Portions ofthis report may not be separated and presanted for regulatory compliance.
D-16
t6
&,aooaaaaal
1645 West 2200 South . Salt L,ake City, Utah g4ltg . 800-973_6724
&rrm#s#$mmf ffimp*M Sff
Report Number:
Date Reported:
WorkOrder:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801_359_3307
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: ANt072-tS7t7-722
Purchase Order: AM072-15717-722
0204038-l
04t22t02
0204038
04/02t02
04/03/02 00:00
Water
24462
Parameter Units Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 J 04/15t02
sw-846 50308/82608:
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I , I -Dichloroethane
l,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethaned4
Toluene-dS
Volatiles, Water
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
Recovery Range
68.1-t24
60.4-138
76.4-t20
pdL
ttdL
pdL
ItgL
ttgL
pelL
ttgL
ye/L
ttE/L
7o Recovery
7o Recovery
o/o Recovery
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
O4ll5/0223:45 CMS
04ll5lo2 23:4s CMS
04/15/0223:45 CMS
0411510223:45 CMS
04/15102 23:45 CMS
O4/15/0223:45 CMS
0411510223:45 CMS
04115/02 23:45 CMS
04/15/0223:45 CMS
O4/1510223:45 CMs
04115/02 23:45 CMS
04/15/0223:45 CMS
97.s
123
101
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel-
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated M*hod Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and prcsented for regulatory compliance.
o-17
Quality Control Summary
ffirxwfyfr*mf ffi*p*M We O
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
DateReported: O4/22102
Work Order: 0204038
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Bp Amoco CHWMF
Project ID: ANl072-157 l7-722
1645 West2200 South . Salt Lake City,Utah B4llg, 800-973_6724
SW-846 60108: Metals by hrlCp, Water
QC Type Method Blank
Sample ID: PBW-8603
Run ID: TJA-IRIS_020409B
Parameter
Chromium
Analysis Date: 04109102 19:55
Prep Batch ID: 8603
Spike
Parent
0
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
0 0 -0.02
Units: mC/L
Seq No: 336255
Iligh Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RpD Limit
0.01
Result
0.00097
QC Type: l^aboratory Control Sample (Water)
Sample ID: LCSW-8603
Run ID: TJA-IRIS_020409B
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
0410910219:58
8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 104
Units: mgtt-
Seq No: 336256
Iligh Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limit
125
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.416
Low
Limit
75
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Sample Duplicate
0203318-01B D
TJA-IRIS_O204O9B
AnalysisDate: 04/0910220.07
Prep Batch ID: 8603
Units: mgfi-
Seq No: 336258
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limir
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low
LimitResult
U
Spike
Parent
20NC
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel-
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside of quantiration range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-18
&m*Egtimmf ffimp*uu* @
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Bp Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: ANt}'t2-lSi.t7-722
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah 800-973-6724
Quality Control Summary
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
02M038-l
04/22/02
0204038
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike
0203318-0lB MS
TJA.IRIS-O2O4O9B
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
ParentResuIt
0.422
04/09102 20:t0
8603
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
0.400 106 75
Units: mgL
Seq No: 336259
Iligh Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RpD Limit
125
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike Duplicate
0203318-0lB MsD
TJA-IRIS-O2O4O9B
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
0410910220:14
8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 103
Result
0.41I
Low
Limit
75
Units: nlgL
Seq No: 336260
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RpD Limit
125 0.422 2.7 20
QC Type: Post Digestion/Distillation Spike
Sample ID: 0203318-0lB A
Run ID: TJA-IRIS_020409B 04/0910220:17
8603
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
0.400 105 7 5
Units: mgtl-
SeqNo:336261
Iligh DuplicateLimit Parent RpD
125
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.418
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Sptke
Parent
U
RPD
Limit
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Serial Dilution
0203318-0lB L
TJA-IRIS-O204O9B
AnalysisDate: 0410910220:23
Prep Batch ID: 8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: mgfi-
Seq No: 336262
Duplicate
Parent VoDResult
Spike
Parent Low
Limit YoD
Limit
IIigh
Limit
U l0NC
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculared: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-19
l645west2200South . saltlakecity,utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
Quality Control Summary
&ww#y*€mm$ ffiwp*# W O
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
DateReported: 04122/02
Work Order: 0204038
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: ANl072-15717-722
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
QCType: IaboratoryConholSpike
Sample ID: 020415w1
Run ID: [IP4_020415A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l, I -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethaned4
ToluenedS
AnalysisDate: 04115/0220:16
Prep Batch ID: R30208
. Units: pe/L
Seq No: 337525
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limit
124
n2
123
134
113
124
138
120
Spike
Parent
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low
LimitResult
18.7
t9.4
t9.2
22.t
r 9.l
49.9
s5.8
50.6
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
93.3 70.7
97.2 86.5
96.0 70
l l0 73.595.5 8l .9
99.7 68.1ttz 60.4
l0l 76.4
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-20
20
Quality Control Summary
S *,ms-Hfrmmf ffiep#nd,ry$&
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
DateReportedz 04122102
Work Order: 0204038
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Bp Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: AM072-15717-722
I 645 West 2200 South . Salt take City, Utah g4ttg . g}0_973_6:24
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: 020415wb
Run ID: HP-4_020415A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I , I -Dichloroethane
l, l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, I, l -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date: 04/15102 2l:0g
Prep Batch ID: R30208
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: lt9tL
SeqNo:337527
Duplicate RPDParent RPD LimitResult
Spike
Parent
Low HighLimit Limit
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
50.0 99.250.0 I 1350.0 98.9
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
68.1 124
60.4 138
76.4 t20
00
00
0000
00
0000
00
00
49.6
56.6
49.5
0
0
0
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for reguratory compriance.
D-21
2l
Quatity Control Summary
ffin*xf3rfr*ax# ffi*p*# We O
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
DateReported:. O4/22102
Work Order: 0204038
Client: The RETEC Group, [nc.
Project: BP Amoco CIIWMF
Project ID: ANl072-15717-722
I 645 West 2200 South . Satt Lake City, Utah g4tlg . g00473-6724
QC Type: Matrix Spike
SampleID: 0204114-0lbms
Run ID: HP4_020415,A,
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l,l -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
AnalysisDate: 04/1510222:53
Prep Batch ID: R30208
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: ltglL
SeqNo:337531
Duplicate RPDParent RPD LimitResult
763
770
73t
1280S(2m)
786
1910
2450
1950
Spike
Parent
U
U
U
U
50J
Low
Ltmit
19.4
83.8
59.4
67.3
70. l
High
Limit
95.4
96.3
91.3
160
92.0
0 2000 95.50 2000 1220 2000 97.7
tt7
114
139
131
133
68.1 t2460.4 13876.4 120
800
800
800
800
800
2m: MS/MSD are outside acceptable limits - LCs was within limits - mahix interference is suspected
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-22
22
Quality Control Summary
ffimmfyfr**d ffi*po*f {ffi
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
DateReported: 04/22102
Work Order: 02M038
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: BP Amoco CIIWMF
ProjectID: AM072-t5717-722
1645West2200South . Saltlakecity,Utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
QC Type: Matrix Spike Duplicate
SampleID: 02041l4-0lbmsd
Run ID: HP4_020415A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l, I -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
AnalysisDate: 0411510223 19
Prep Batch ID: R30208
Unih: IICIL
Seq No: 337532
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limit
tt7 763 1.9 t7 .7tt4 770 2.9 12.1139 731 5.2 20l3l 1280 3.5 t2133 '786 4.t 12.9
124
138
120
SpikeResult parent True Percent
Value Recovery
Low
Limit
778
793
769
1320S(2m)
819
1940
2470
1960
U
U
U
U
50J
800 97.2 79.4800 99.1 83.8800 96.2 59.4800 t66 67.3800 96.1 70.1
0 2000 96.9 68. r0 2000 t23 60.40 2000 97.9 76.42m: MS/MSD are outside acceptable limits - LCS was within limits - matrix interference is suspected
QCType: LaboratoryConholSpike
Sample ID: 020416w14
Run ID: HP4_020416C
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
1, I -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date: 04116102 20:37
Prep Batch ID: R30224
Spike
Parent
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: ltE/L
Seq No: 337587
Duplicate RIDParent RPD Limit
Low HighLimit LimitResult
19.3
20.4
t 8.9
2t.8
19.8
48.6
45.9
48.9
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
124
tt2
123
134
l13
124
138
120
963 70.7102 86.594.s 70109 73.599.2 8 I .9
97 .r 68.191.8 60.4
97.8 76.4
U - Nor detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
o-23
23
Quality Control Summary
&mm-$p,f*##g ffi#p** W O
ReportNumber: 0204038-l
DateReported: 04/22/02
Work Order: 0204038
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Bp Amoco CIIWMF
ProjectID: AN[OTZ-|17t7-722
I 645 West 2200 south . Salt take city, utah 84119 . 800_973_6724
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: 02}4l6v/l4RUnID: HP4_020416C
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l,l -Dichloroethane
l,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, 1, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
I,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluened8
AnalysisDate: 04116/0221:M
Prep Batch ID: Rj0224
Units: pgL
Seq No: 337588
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RpD Limil
Low
LimitResult
47.2
44.7
48.7
Spike
Parent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
True Percent
Value Recovery
0 0.30 0.9o o.l0 0.70 0.8o 0.30 0.40 0.6
02
50.0 94.3 68.1 12450.0 89.s 60.4 13850.0 97.5 76.4 120
0
0
0
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel.
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and prcsmted for regulatory compriance.
o-24
24
1645 West 2200 South Salt Lake City, Utah 800-973-6724
&xNr,1y*r&*mf ffimp*# Sff
ReportNumber: 0Z04O3B-|
DateReported: 04/22102
Work Order: 0204038
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: BP Amoco CHWMF
ProjectID: ANI072-15717-722
QC Type: Matrix Spike
SampleID: 0204028-06ams
Run [D: HP4_020416C
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l,l -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
AnalysisDate: 0411610223:16
Prep Batch ID: R3,O224
True Percent
Value Recovery
1000 87.81000 94.71000 89.91000 los1000 92.9
2s00 96.82500 98.1
2500 97.2
Units: pElL
Seq No: 337592
Duplicate RpDParent RPD LimitResult
878
947
899
1050
929
2420
2450
2430
Spike
Parent
U
U
U
U
U
0
0
0
High
Limit
Low
Limit
79.4 tt783.8 I 14
59.4 13967.3 13170.1 133
68.1 12460.4 13876.4 120
QC Type: Matrix Spike Duplicate
SampleID: 0204028-06amsd
Run ID: HP-4_020416C
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l,l -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
AnalysisDate: 0411610223:42
Prep Batch ID: R30224
Units: lr9lL
SeqNo: 337593
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RpD Limit
I t7 878 9.0 t7 .7114 947 6.8 tz.t139 899 6.2 20l3l 1050 7.4 t2133 929 6.3 tz.g
124
138
120
Result
960
l0l0
957
I 130
990
2420
2460
2480
Spike
Parent
U
U
U
U
U
0
0
0
r000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2500
2500
2500
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low
Limit
96.0 79.4
l0l 83.8
95.7 59.4
I 13 67.3
99.0 70.1
96.9 68. t
98.6 60.4
99.4 "16.4
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel-
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
lndividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-25
25
EorHa5(J
'loc
(U
F(J
(I)
o-
E(5
U)TcRABiR-€htortatcrthxo
l!!cEt
EE
sgOFI
!io6E
aa5A-o8Tr!I\
J6E
.tl E6aOE
REEF}Y
EB
o-E3
c\l(o.+
-+c\j
C5
---
ag.9.F'E(tr
v,q,.Et!{dv)
-bl
rtrl
-lEI
=lol
=ldl4t:l
)o.
-a
41
t-(n
D-26
l,lountaln States Analytical, f nc.
Otert lfam"
Qnler:
Work $der No.
Canler Number:
Cooler InformaUon: [on:nad E(dntsO Whlbltr ydlowtltr Yollowlll O
Orlody Seals Present:Yes O ],loF Not Appltcable O
Intact0 Broken0 Seal Number:
PIDReadirE - ppm
Cooter t{umber/tD: i^i^i} - lOAft +T:ry yyT"yty Readns (tf requtred) - rnVhr t-r.rdtrn },iodet 3 sertat #-_ ___' Trarsport Indo< (1 meter reading for yellow II & tU onty) .z mn/rr
Condltlonof ShlpplngConiainer: M/ - Fairtr Damaged (erplain)Coolersealed(tapecl): yeso' Not' NotAppllcableo plDReadi
odant ,ny' Bueletr Nonetr otle:--Sffie of Godant: - Frozen O partally Rozen O t,leltedrarpenure:--fult *"rr***ir,''-:;j"r on"ffiF.or -+ TenpBrankrnduded: vesy' Hoo
Paddng DesalNofl:
Ghaln{f-Qrstody Infotma6;;
@C Pnesent:
@Ct{umbo(s):
@C CEned (rdimuls*red and reei\red):
COC agrees with sample labels:
llotAppHletr
Not Applicable Et
lfo O
Sample fnformatson:
Qstody Seals Presents
Samde contalners lntact:
Sanpl€s lir prcper contalnes:
Sumchnt samde ydurne:
Af samples rccrhrcd ln hold Ume:
wabr- VOAI haw zem hea@e:
Pre-preaeryexl wtUr.Fr1y'
Notss:
Yestr uol
InbctQ Brokerrtf,
vesd NoE'tail ttoov*b NotrY*F ftlotr
11st ftrplicaHe tr O0rer
Seal Number(s)
N,obs:
Y*fl NoCl NotApptkaHeo/nepre*r,red wtth Na2SZO3: tr Non-Preserved: tr
Wahr- pH aacepBPle upon recetpU Vesy' _Adllsbd (see @mments bdow) OHNo:= <4 Hrsor= <Z NaOH=
Water - pH adJusted: (MSAI Traddng No.)
NotApplicaHe O
ZnAC/tlaoH =HCL =
HNO!HISO{NaOll
ZnAC NarSQOr Otter
No&s:
Cooler Cofientr fnrpeOO t Verlf,ed Ey:
_ rt-Z-ol
D-27
lm"rJ$&- Revte1ved ay PP Dro,t ,tL.gR
&nmfyfr*mt ffimpo# Sff O1645 West 2200 south . saltl^akc city, utah 84119 . 800-973_6724
April 18,2002
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
(801) 3s9-30s9 Fax: (801) 3s9-3307
Project:Closed (CHWMF)Work Order:020401s
Dear Mr. Mark Roeinske.
Il"rk you for using Mountain States Analytical, Inc. (MSAI) as your environmental
information resource. Our reports are designed to meet the Certiiied Laboratory Reporting
Requirements of Utah Administrative code R444-14-I2(10) and the National Envirtnmental
Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIELAP), Section 5. 1 3.
This is Report Number 0204015-l and contains 13 pages of information for the 2 samples
submitted to MSAI on Monday, April 01, 2002. Any sample receipt documentation detailed inthe work order Receipt Summary of this report (e.g., chain-of-custody, work orderAuthorization, etc.) and/or analytical results noted as "see attached " ari included by reference
as attachments following page 13. For regulatory compliance reporting, individual pages orportions of this report may not be separated
If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this report, please feel free tocontact me at [phone] ext.3026 or by e-mail at [e-mail].
Mountain States Analytical, Inc.
Rolf E. Larsen
Senior Proiect Manager
D-28
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
Sample Summary
Additional Sample Information
ffirxmfSrfr *mff Wwp*M S$e
ReportNumber: 0204015-l
Date Reported: 04118102
Work Order: 0204015
Date Collected
I 645 West 2200 South . salt Lake city, Utah 84119 . 800_973-6724
0204015-0rA
02M015-0lB
0204015-02A
02M015-028
wQ-5
wQ-s
wQ-4
wQ4
Water
Water
Water
Water
o4t0lt02
04/01/02
04t0yaz
0410U02
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-29
.&r*mP3r$m*sffimp*ffi W O
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
Sample ID Client Sample ID
1 645 West 2200 South . Salt L:ke Ciry, Utah B4llg . 800-973-6724
Holding Time Summary
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
02040 I 5-l
04^8t02
0204015
Date Collected
0204015-0lA WQ-5
Parameter
Metals by hrICP
Leachate
Start Date End Date lff Prep Date
0410910210:00
04/01102 13:50
IIT Analysis Date HT
04lO9lO2 2l:12 180
0204015-0lB wQ-5
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date IIT Prep Date
O4lOll0213:50
IIT Analysis Date HT
04n5tl2 30
04115102 2l:34 t4
0204015-02A wQ4
Parameter
Metals by hrICP
Leachate
Start Date End Date IIT Prep Date
04109102 10:J0
O4lOllO2 l5:25
HT Analysis Date HT
04109/02 2l:17 180
020401s-02B wQ4
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
04l0l/02 15:25
IIT Analysis Date HT
04h5t02 30
04/1510222:00 14
+ - The recommended holding time was exceeded
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-30
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah B4ttg . 800-973_6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt l_ake ciry, uT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801-359_3307
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
ffimrruiy*#*w$ Wwps## W&
ReportNumber: 0204015-l
Date Reported: 04/18102
Work Order:02040 I s
Lab Sample ID: 94XAH-0IAClient Sample lO ,/WQ-51
Datecollected: l-oado2
Date Received: 04101102 16:57
Matrix:
COC ID:
Water
2M6t
Parameter Result MDL PQL,Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 3005A:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
FIame/hrICP Prep, Water
8603
Metals by hrICP, Water
04/09/02 l0:00
04109102 2l:12
MAM
DGW0.01 0.05 mgL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
t - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside nonnal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-31
.,&mwfy$ €*m& ff*pm# W O
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt lake Ciry, Ln 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
1645 West 2200 South . Saltlakecity,utah 84119 . soo_973_6724
ReportNumber: 0204015-l
Date Reported: 04118102
Work Order: 0204015
Lab Sample ID: 0204015-0lB
Client Sample lor 6
DateColtected | \tto2
Date Received: 04101102 16,57
Matrix: Water
COC ID: 24461
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF'Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check- GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH 4l
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
15
o4fist02 CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,1-Dichloroethane
l, l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-120
ttC/L
ttgL
ILdL
ygL
pdL
pgL
tdL
ttdL
pclL
o/o Recovery
%o Recovery
o% Recovery
04115/0221:34 CMS
0411510221:34 CMs
O4ll5l022l:34 CMs
0411510221:34 CMS
O4ll5l022l:34 CMS
0411510221:34 CMS
0411510221:34 CMS
0411510221:34 CMS
O4ll5l02 2l:34 CMS
04/15102 2L:34 CMS
O4/1510221.,34 CMS
O4ll5l02 2l:34 CMS
103
ll6
99.7
U - Not daected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the PQL
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
o-32
.-i$.:i: . Mountain States Analytical. lnc.
1645 West22o0South . Saltlakecity,utah 84119 . 800_973-6724
ffi-rx*#3r.f;#mmf ffi*p*#.i$'dgli&
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt L,ake City, {.IT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
Purchase 0rder:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COCID:
020401s-r
04fi8/02
0204015
0449s-02A(&o+\
04t0v02
04/01/02 16.,57
Water
24461
Parameter Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
SW-846 30054: Flame/hrlCp prep, Water
Prep Batch ID: 8603
SW-846 60108: Metals by hrlCp, Water
Chromium
o
04t09/02 MAM
04109/02 2l:17 DGW
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel-
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-33
I 645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Urah B4ll9 . 800-9734724
#* m,m, & y*{*m$ $#mp *# {fff
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
suite 2006
Salt t ake City, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801-359_3307
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COCID:
02040 I 5- I
04n8t02
020401 s
94/s s-ozsgy/
04t0U02
04/01/02 l6:s7
Water
2446t
Parameter MDL PQL Units Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH 4J
SW-846 50308/8260B: Volatiles, Water
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
99.2
126
98.7
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
15
04ns/02
O4/15102 22:00 CMS
O4lL5l02 22:00 CMS
O4ll5/02 22:00 CMS
O4/1510222:00 CMS
04115102 22:00 CMS
0411510222:O0 CMS
04/15/02 22:00 CMS
0411510222:00 CMS
04115/0222:o0 CMS
O4/1510222:00 CMS
0411510222:00 CMS
0411510222:00 CMS
CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l, I -Dichloroethane
1, I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, l -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
2
ttgL
pdL
ttdL
ttgL
ttdL
PE/L
ttgL
pgrL
ttgL
oZ Recovery
7o Recovery
7o Recovery
Recovery Range
68.t-t24
60.4-138
76.4-120
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the PQL
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-34
Quality Control Summary
ffirrmfpfr*mf ffi*6*d Sff
ReportNumber: 02M015-1
Date Reported: 04/18/02
Work Order: 0204015
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
1645 West2200 South . Saltlake Ciry, Utah B41lg . 800-973_6724
SW-846 60108: Metals by hrlCp, Water
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: PBW-8603
Run ID: TJA-IRIS_020409B
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.00097
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
0
0410910219:55
8603
True Percent' Low
Value Recovery Limit
0 0 -0.02
Units: mgtL
Seq No: 336255
High Duplicate RIDLimit Parent RPD Limit
0.01
QC Type: [.aboratory Control Sample (Water)
Sample ID: LCSW-8603
Run ID: TJA-IRIS_020409B
Analysis Date: 04109102 19:58
Prep Batch ID: 8603
Spike
Parent
True Percent Low Iligh
Value Recovery Limit Limit
0.400 104 75 12s
Uuits: mgL
Seq No: 336256
Duplicate R.PDParent RPD LimitParameter
Chromium
Result
0.416
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Sample Duplicate
02033 l8-0lB D
TJA-IRIS_O204O9B
AnalysisDate: 0410910220:07
Prep Batch ID: 8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: mClL
Seq No: 336258
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
UNC20
Result
U
Spike
Parent
Low HighLimit Limit
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analle detected below the pel-
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-35
I 645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake ciry, Utah 841t9 . 800_973_6724
.&r,;m$3,rflr*mf &mum#n{ ,S$&
O
Report Number: 0204015-l
Date Reported: 04118102
Work Order: 0204015
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike
0203318-0tB MS
TJA.IRIS_O2O4O9B
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
0410910220:10
8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 106
Result
0.422
Low
Limil
75
Units: mgll-
SeqNo: 336259
High Duplicate RIDLimit Parent RPD Limit
125
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike Duplicate
0203318-018 MSD
TJA-IRIS-O2O4O9B
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
04109102 20:.14
8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 103
Result
0.41I
Low HighLimit Limit
75 t2s
Units: mg/I-
SeqNo: 336260
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
0.422 2.7 20
QC Type Post Digestion/Distillation Spike
Sample ID: 0203318-018 A
Run ID: TJA-IRIS_020409B
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
04109/0220:l'l
8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 105
Units: rndL
SeqNo:336261
High Duplicate RPDLimit Parent RPD Limit
125
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.4r8
Low
Limit
75
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Serial Dilution
02033 r8-0lB L
TJA-IRIS-O2O4O9B
Analysis Date: 04109102 20:23
Prep Batch ID: 8603
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low HighLimit Limit
Units: mglL
Seq No: 336262
Duplicate o/.D
Parent %D Limit
UNCIO
Result
U
Spike
Parent
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outdide normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-36
.taaa..aa.lraa.a
Quality Control Summary
&xNw\vs*F*m$ ffimpr*# We
ReportNumber: 02M015-l
Date Reported:. 04118102
Work Order: 020401s
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
I 645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake Ciry, Utah B4llg , 800-973_6724
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
I , I -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Laboratory Control Spike
020415w1
HP-4_020415A
A-nalysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
04/15102 20:16
R30208
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
Units: ltClL
Seq No: 337525
Duplicate RIDParent RPD Limit
Spike
Parent
High
LimitResult
18.7
t9.4
19.2
22.1
19.I
49.9
55.8
s0.6
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
93.3
97.2
96.0
lt0
95.5
50.0 99.7
50.0 tt2s0.0 l0l
70.7 r2486.5 tt2
70 t23
73.s t3481.9 113
68.1 124
60.4 r38
76.4 120
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
lndividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-37
10
Quatity Control Summary
&xN*fyirr*md ffimp*ffi Str O
ReportNumber: 02M015-l
Date Reportedz 04118102
Work Order: 02M015
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
1645 West22o0south . saltlakecity,utah 84119 . g00-973-6724
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: 020415wb
Run ID: HP-4_0204154
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1 , l -Dichloroethane
I , 1-Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, l -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluened8
Result
AnalysisDate: 0411510221:08
Prep Batch ID: R30208
Spike
Parent
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
Unih: tLdL
Seq No: 337527
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
High
Limit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0.30 0.9
0 0.30 0.70 0.8
0 0.3
0 0.40 0.6
02
99.2 68.1 r24
113 60.4 138
98.9 76.4 120
49.6
s6.6
49.5
50.0
s0.0
50.0
0
0
0
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside of quantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
ll
D-38
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 . S00-973_6724
A romdyflrmx*,f ffi*p m.+'e'
ReportNumber: 0204015-l
Date Reported: O4lI8l02
Work Order: 02M015
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Matrix Spike
02041 l4-0lbms
HP-4_020415A
04115/0222:53
R30208.
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: tt9lL
Seq No: 337531
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
SpikeResult Parent
Low
Limit
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l, I -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichl oroethane-d4
Toluene-dS
763
770
731
1280S(2m)
786
t9l0
2450
1950
U
U
U
U
50I
800 95.4 79.4
800 96.3 83.8800 9 t.3 59.4
800 160 67.3
800 92.0 10.t
0 2000 95.5 68.10 2000 t22 60.40 2000 97j 76.4
High DuplicateLimit Parent
tt7
lt4
139
l3l
r33
124
138
120
RPD
RPD Limit
2m: MS/I{SD are outside acceptable limits - LCS was within limits - matrix interference is suspected
U - Not dctected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
lndividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regu(atory compliance.
D-39
t2
Quality Control Summary
&rxmfy,r{mmr' ffi*p#af Sff O
Report Number: 0204015-l
Date Reportedz 04118102
Work Order: 0204015
Client: The RETEC Group, Inc.
Project: Closed (CHWMF)
Project ID:
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Iake City, Utah 84llg . 800-973-6724
QC Type: Mahix Spike Duplicate
SampleID: 02041l4-0lbmsd
Run ID: HP4_020415A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
I , I -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
SpikeResult Parent
04115102 23:19
R30208
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: ltgL
Seq No: 337532
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limit
tt7 763 1.9 17.7tl4 770 29 tz.t
139 731 5.2 20
l3l 1280 3.5 t2
133 786 4.1 12.9
124
138
t20
Low
Limit
778
793
769
1320S(2m)
819
t940
2470
1960
U
U
U
U
50J
800 97.2 79.4800 99.1 83.8
800 96.2 59.4800 166 67.3800 96.1 70.1
0 2000 969 68.10 2000 t23 60.40 2000 97.9 76.4
2m: MS/IvISD are outside acceptable limits - LCS was within limits - matrix interference is suspected
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analytc detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance,
D40
t3
gJJJiJ
JJ # IJJJd Iu ;u gu slll* 5u ilr
oEI
Eotr
oj
,,8:
'1..r
-'a-
:.!'6.
. ;:ti";i*
":l'trIi;.#
-':+:a
-,,;b'r;E
::ll{:
ffil:tttsi:l5il,tffiifnl
.11
J*+
,+.16
":Jui$rrrGitr:,,1-i{
Efi::til
i:!i
€;
.v,:,!a
1'xl' -',
ad
:l€r'::
r.lan. -l
r;{4:ir1;
l:-tl:i:.iFntl!:. ;rr}: o
\n) rr*4ll {\<lAN *j.;iEi;d
?i, :,>i;.;,;oi:.' lc,,.S,&.,,i:(,.-,o
.t9:.-,-cL.'E.:s.
^a,l,'j'.i.r:
,!l;r lj
s
!
o
15
Ad
-
L
;:i,!Si::
",[(-':b'
o.,E-
,.,]o"'B-':
..[
s..,1.i
€
,"
EIgq
d
.{0
.N
N
I
Ez
ceo
:*
o
0.
TE
,I9fi|T{Fil+r
BIbH
q#s
x 7
o=,ootrEoo-olt
oEo
(L
to
ooIIt
It!,o
t,of
CTEo
fo
EsoJt
>.cIo
.tto
G,toCLotr
o
=(E
E
Eg616
E.c.e5.. oEEEbE;!>aoEE.3+E;q=a=g8rb-o,Ea.=t
'F!r<EIJ
9a9dEv,t-
>(I
t^-sN)..!
S
\x ;':r:,#,',tE
i@'s:i.:*,:*
r
Ic1
:r
I
C
{
Hffi:-*l: i-En,s.l,.=.f#s
w
YGA
root,a
=()
rFoc'6
J-O
(l)
CL
E(U(t)
(o.+
-+
c\l
*B
dtsEIE_ ljj
-18ts lxc5 ls._l(E
-lS-=ldtg lo
EIFola)lHlrEl
-lv)lel.-l(l,I
-lEI
=lol
=ldl
4ii:lN
Io.ERABE(\a ^tlsEo!t
=E8i.rgBf8Bt€bo99eE5td0(,
=ls$8IoE
i!.
r- llETOE
REIFEA96f
=
D-41
Mountaln S.tates Analytical, Inc.
OeftName
Onl€r:
Sample Recelpt Cheddlrt
WortffisNo.uojbls
Canir Nunber:
Cooler tlon{ad Ecnptq WIllbIO ydlowlltr yClowltlo
oooter t{umber/ro:+firk*&-h- grrface Radioacuvr,ty ReadrE (r reqdr€d) - mR/hr Ludlum Mod€t 3 serid #dtppsi fi4,.hl{4,rtr?fi${rrtlndo((l mehrreadrnstuYdlowll&IIIonty) - mR/trr
OnrllUon of Shipplng Conhiner: Coodp Fair O Danuged (oplatn)
Yestr NoF
Yeso NoF
Intact0 BrokenB
teil Blue lce O Nofle O Ofter:
Parudly Roz€nE MdEd tr "rtrennonreterlD:- --- conedonFacbr: - TenrpEar*Induded, vrl.y'i#.
Cooler Sealed (taped):
Ar*ody Seals prmnt:
Odant:
Not Apdlcable B
Not Appllcable o
PID Reading - ppm
Seal Number:
Stab ofCoolants Frozen trrrnpentnE'.4,i&H-rf Q-l-oz ---Ee-
Paddng Hpdon:
OOC &esent:
@Cttrnber(s):
@Cd(n€d (dlmut$ed and received):
@C agrees with sarnple labels;Notes;_
YoF, No tr Not AppthaHe oYesF NoB NotApplicable0
Yesy' Notr2r{rlu\Other:
Sample fnformaUon:
Orsbdy Seals Present:
Sande @ntalnexs lnbd:
Sarnples Ih proper contdners:
9fid€nt samde volurne:
AI gndes rechrcd ln hold [me:
W&r - VOAI ltave zero trea@ae:
Pre{resen ed vaUnrcz/
NoEs:
I'lot ApplicaHe B OherlroF
Broker0 Seal Mrnba(s)
Notr
NoO
t{o O
tlo tr
t'lotes:
IYesF Noo NotApplicaHetr
Pre-Eeserrcd with Na2S2O3: O Non-Preserved: O
Watur - pH acceptable upon reodph Yesf
HNOr = (3 HrSor = /
Watcr - pH adJusted: (MSAI Traddng
HNOr
ZnAC
Musted (see comnents bdow) tr NotAppltcaHe B
l{aOH =--- ZnAC[taOH =
NaOH
Otter
HCL =
No)
HrSOr
Narsopr
l{otrs:
Dats:"{-l-oz-
o42
E nts lntp€cted tVerlllod Bf
nmo: l?oo Revtewed uy: bF ,",", {lflg}-
ffimwfpfrmml ffi*pw#
1645 West2200 South . Saltlakeciry,Utah B41lg . 800-973-6724
September 19,2002
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West'200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 94101
(801) 3s9-3059 Fax: (801) 3sg-3307
Project:CHWMF Work Order:0209049
Dear Mr. Mark Roeinske.
Thank you for using Mountain States Analytical, LLC (MSA) as your environmentalinformation resource. Our reports are designed to meet the iertified Laboratory ReportingRequirements of utah Administrative code R444-14-12(10) and the National EnvironmentalLaboratory Accreditation program (NELAP), Section 5.13.
-
This is Report Number 0209049-I and contains 20 pages of information for the 4 samplessubmitted to MSA on Friday, September 06,2002. Any sample receipt documentation detailedin the work order Receipt Summary of this report 1e.g., chain-of-custody, work orderAuthorization, etc.) and/or analytical results noted as 'isee attached ', are included by reference
as attachments following page 20. For regulatory compliance reporting, individual pages orportions of this report may not be separated. Except as noted, the test results for the methodsand parameters listed on MSA's most recent NELAC certification letter meet all requirements ofNELAC.
If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this report, please feel free tocontact me at [phone] ext.3026 or by e-mail at [e-mail].
Mountain States Analytical, LLC
Rolf E. Larsen
Senior Project Manager
D43
I 645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah g4llg . g00-973_6724
,&ffi*dgrfrmmf' ffimpm4
Report Number: 0209M9-1
Date Reported: 09119102
Work 0rder: 0209049
Matrix
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
Sample Summary
Additional Sample lnformation Date Collected
0209049-0lA
0209049-0lB
0209049-02A
0209049-028
0209049-03A
0209049-038
0209049-04A
0209049-048
wQ-3
wQ-3
wQ4
wQ4
wQ-5
wQ-5
s-16
s-16
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
09t06t02
09t06t02
09t06t02
09/06t02
09t06/02
09/06t02
09/06t02
09t06/02
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D44
.taaaraaaa n
1645 West 2200 South Saltlake City, Utah 84119 . 800-9T3-6724
Holding Time Summary
Report Number: 0209049-1
DateReported: 09119102
Work Order: 0209049
d&nmfpfs*m$ ffimperrd
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
Sample ID
The RETEC Group
CHWMF
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
0209049-01A
Parameter
Metals by ICP
wQ-3
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09112102 14:oo
09106/02 t0:40
HT Analysis Date HT
09/12/0219:50 180
0209049-0lB v/Q_3
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09/06/02 t0:40
HT Analysis Date
09il7t02
09/17102 t8:55
HT
30
t4
0209049-02A
Parameter
Metals by ICP
wQ-4
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09112/021400
09/0610213.40
HT Analysis Date HT
0911210219:53 180
0209049-02B,
Parameter
wQ-4
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09/06/02 t3:40
HT Analysis Date
09/17 t02
09/17/02 t9:15
HT
30
t4
0209049-03A wQ_5
Parameter
Metals by ICP
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09/1210214:00
09/06/02 t4:40
HT Analysis Date HT
09112102 t9,58 180
0209049-038 wQ_5
Farameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
0209049-04A s_16
Parameter
Leachate
Start Date End Date
Start Date
Leachate
End Date
HT Prep Date HT
HT Prep Date
09106102 14:40
Analysis Date HT
09/17/02 30
09/17102 19:35 t4
09106/02 09 15
Analysis Date HTHT
+ - The recommended holding time was exceeded
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliancc.
D45
ca
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake Ciry, Utah 841t9 800-973-6'.124
Holding Time Summary
ReportNumber: 0209049-l
Date Reported: 09119102
Work Order: 0209049
ffira*/yfr*mf ffieff*rf
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Sample ID Client Sample ID
Date Collected
Metals by ICP 0911210214:00 09112/0220:03 180
0209049-048 s-16
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09/06102 09:15
HT Analysis Date HTo9n7to2 30
09111102 19:56 t4
t - The recommended holding time was exceeded
Individual pages ot portions ofthis teport may not be separated and presanted for regulatory compliance.
D-46
1645
,&rxx*fyfr*md ffi*pmrd
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase 0rder:
West220oSouth . SaltlakeCity,Utah 84119 . g00-973-6724
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
suite 2006
Salt lake City, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
CHWMF
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209049-l
09t19t02
0209049
_p9lQ$-ote(w,
09/0610216:45
Water
25313
Parameter Result MDL PQL Unif,s DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 3005A:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 6010B:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
977 5
Metals by ICP, Water
09112102 l4:00
49112/0219:50
BBO
DGW0.01 0.0s mglL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Resuls ouside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D47
I 645 West 2200 Soutlr . Salt Lake city, utah 84119 . 800-973_6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Satt Lake Cify, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801-359_3307
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
,&mmfy$r**f ffiep*rf
ReportNumber: 0209049-l
Date Reported: 09119/02
Work Order: 0209049
Lab Sample ID: ffifSlOtZClient Sample tD: (Wa->/
Date Collected: 09/06102
Date Received: 09/06/02 16:.45
Matrix: Water
COC ID: 25313
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 J
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles,Water
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-120
09/17/02 cMS
O9/17/0218:55 CMS
09117/0218:55 CMS
09ll7lO2 18,,55 CMS
09117102 18.,55 CMS
09/17/02 18,,55 CMS
09117/02 18:55 CMS
09117102 18,,55 CMS
0911710218:55 CMS
09/17102 18l.55 CMS
09ll"t/0218:55 CMS
0911710218:55 CMS
09117/0218:55 CMS
0.001 I
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l,l -Dichloroethane
l, l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
I ,1, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
98.2
l13
96.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
I
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
15
ILgL
pgL
ttgL
PElL
ttdL
trdL
ttdL
pgL
pc/L
% Recovery
% Recovery
% Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
ktdividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D48
.taaa a.aaal.aa.a
1645 West2200South . Saltlakeciry,Utah g4ll9 . 800_973_6724
ffirxmfSr$rm *8 Wwrywrg
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT g4l0l
801-359-3059 Fax: 801_359_3307
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
WorkOrder:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209049-1
09/19/02
0209049
02.0pQ49-02A@09/06t02
09/06/0216:45
Water
25311
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF'Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 30054:
Prep Batch ID:
SW-846 60108r
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP prep, Water
9775
Metals by ICP, Water
09/12102 14:00 BBO
0911210219:53 Dcw0.01 0.05 mdL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation rangc
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
krdividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compriance,
D-49
.&rxmfy#r*m$ #ffmp*r#
I 645 West 2200 South . salt Lake city, Utah g4ll9 . 800_973-6724
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 Souflr
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
CHWMF
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209049-l
0949/02
0209049
02!9Q{9-02B
rfroa')\_v
09t06/02
09106102 16:45
Water
25313
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <Z I
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
96.2
ll3
94.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
I
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-t20
09n7t02 cMs
0911710219:15 CMS
0911710219:15 CMS
O9ll7l02 19l.15 CMS
0911710219 15 CMS
09117/O2 19:.15 CMS
09/17102 t9:.15 CMS
09ll7lt219:15 CMS
09117102 t915 CMS
09117/02 19:15 CMS
0911710219:15 CMS
09117/02 19:15 CMS
09117102 19:.15 CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I , I -Dichloroethane
I ,1-Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, 1 -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
I,2-Dichloroethaned4
Toluene-d8
ttdL
ttdL
ItglL
ttgL
ttdL
ttdL
ttgL
ttgL
pglL
oZ Recovery
o/o Recovery
'Z Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Anallte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Resuls outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-50
tn
1645 Wesr2200South . Saltlakeciry,Utah 84119 . 800_973-6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake Ciry, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801_359_3307
Project: CI{WMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
ffir*mfyfr*mf ffi*p*d
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209049-t
09/19/02
0209049
929We-03^
@e)
09/06t02
09106/0216:,4s
Water
25313
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 30054:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
f,'lame/hrlCP Prep, Water
9775
Metals by ICP, Water
0.01 0.05 mglL
09112/02 t4:00 BBO
| 0911210219:58 DGW
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel.
t - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results ontside normal recovery limi*
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-51
otraaaa.aa.r Mo Srwmfp*frcmr ffi*p*r{
1645 West2200 south . salrlake city,utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Orderl
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209049-l
09119/02
0209049
94s-orn(gs/
09106t02
09106/0216:45
Water
25313
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]?
CHWMF
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
r Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l,l -Dichloroethane
I , I -Dichl oroethene
Ethylbenzene
I , I , I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
<2J
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
I
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
ttdL
ttgL
ItgL
IL4L
IL4L
ttgL
ttdL
ttClL
IIEIL
09t17t02 CMS
O9/l7lO2 19,,35 CMS
O9/1710219:35 CMS
O9ll7lo2 19:35 CMS
09ll7l0219:35 CMS
0911710219:35 CMS
09/17102 19:35 CMS
09/17/0219:35 CMS
09117/0219:35 CMS
0911710219:35 CMS
O9ll7l0219:15 CMS
09117/o219:35 CMS
09117102 19:35 CMS
98.9
109
95.9
Recovery Range
68.1-t24
60.4-138
76.4-120
o/o Recovery
oZ Recovery
oZ Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report nay not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-52
l0
..Iaa,aa.aa.oun
West 2200 South . Salt L,ake Ciry, Utah B4llg . 800-973-6724
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
i75 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
0209049-l
09fi9t02
0209049
0209049-04A-6\/ s-t6 J
09/06t02
09106102l6:45
Water
25313
801-359-3059 Fax: 801_359_3307
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
&rem$yfr**€ W*p*r#.
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 3005A:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
9775
Metals by ICP, Water
09112/02 l4:00
09/1210220:03
BBO
DGW0.01 0.05 mglL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel,
+ - Result is greater tlan the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside of quantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
hdividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-53
tai
1645 West2200 South . SaltlakeCity,Utah 84119 . g00-973-6724
Client: Mr. Mark,Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake city, UT r+tot
801-359-3059 Fax: 801_359-3307
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
&xxm$g*$mmf ffiwp*r{
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209049-l
09n9t02
0209049
0209049-048,/,a-)\(9
09t06t02
09/0610216:45
Water
25313
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF'Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH 4 J
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatites, Water
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
94.slll
94.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
I
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
09n7t02 cMs
09117/0219:56 CMS
09/17102 19:56 CMS
09117/02 19:56 CMS
0911710219:56 CMS
0911710219:56 CMS
0911,7102 19:56 CMS
0911710219:56 CMS
0911710219:56 CMS
09117102 19.,56 CMS
09/17/0219.56 CMS
09117102 19:56 CMS
09117102 19:56 CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I ,1 -Dichloroethane
I ,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
1, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-120
ItdL
ttdL
ttdL
ttdL
ttElL
pgL
ItgL
ttqlL
IICIL
oZ Recovery
o/o Recovery
oZ Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PeL
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Anallte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-54
1645 West 2200 South . Salr Lake City, Utah 84119 .
&r,r,f ,,f*rmmf mmmr€
ReportNumber: 0209049-l
Date Reported: 09119102
Work Order: 0209049
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
SW-846 60108: Metals by ICp, Water
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: PBW-9775
TJA61E 0209128
Parameter
Chromium
Analysis Date: 09112102 t8:31
Prep Batch ID: 9775
Result
0.0049
Spike
Parent
0
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low HighLimit Limit
-0.02 0.01
Units: mdL
Seq No: 372498
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
QC Type: Laboratory Control Sample (Water)
Sample ID: LCSW-9775
RunID: TJA6IE_020912E
Analysis Date: 09112102 18:33
Prep Batch ID: 9775
Spike
Parent
True Percent Low High
Value Recovery Limit Limit
0.400 103 75 t2s
Units: mglL
Seq No: 372499
Duplicate RPDParent RPD LimitParameter
Chromium
Result
0.413
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Sample Duplicate
0209026-0lB D
TJA61F 0209t2E
Analysis Date: 09/12102 18,39
Prep Batch ID: 9775
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low HighLimit Limit
Units: mgll-
Seq No: 372501
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
UNC20
Result
U
Spike
Parent
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analytc detected below the pel-
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outsidc ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than rhe MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-55
l3
..:L..4.a
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
A cal &xNw#y*{#drd ffi#ff##1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 800-971-6724
Quality Control Summary
Report Number: 0ZO9O49-!
DateReported: 09119102
Work Orden 0209049
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike
0209026-01B MS
TJA6IE_020912E'
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
09112/02 18:41
9775
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 100
Result
0.401
Low
Limit
75
Units: mgL
Seq No: 372502
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RpD Lirrit
t2s
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike Duplicate
0209026-018 MSD
TJA6IE-O2O9I2E
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
09112/02 18:43
977s
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 tor
Result
0.403
Low
Limit
75
Units: mglL
Seq No: 372503
High Duplicate RpI)Limit Parent RpD Limit
tzs 0.401 0.63 20
QC Type: Post Digestion/Distillation Spike
Sample ID: 0209026-018 ARUnID: TJA6IE 0209128
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
0911210218:45
977s
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 98.5
Units: mgtL
Seq No: 372504
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limit
12s
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.394
Low
Limit
75
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Serial Dilution
0209026-0lB L
TJA6IE_020912E
Analysis Date: 09112102 18:49
Prep Batch ID: 9775
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low HighLimit Limit
Units: mgL
Seq No: 372505
Duplicate yoD
Parent YoD Limit
UNCIO
Result
U
Spike
Parent
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
B - Aaalyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory conrpliance
D-56
.t.ao
ffixrmfyfr*mf ffappm#1645 West 2200 South .salrlakecity,Utah 84119 . 800-973_6724
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ReportNumber: 0209049-1
Date Reported: 09119/02
Work Order: O2O9O49
SW-846 5030B/82608: Volatiles, Extract
QC Type: TCLp Blank
Sample ID: tblk9766
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l, I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2 -Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dS
Result
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
49.2
54.7
48.3
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
09117102l1:47
R32737
' True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
00
0000
00
00
00
00
50.0 98.5 68.150.0 109 60.450.0 96.5 76.4
Units: ltCfi-
Seq No: 373798
High DuplicateLimit Parent
25
l5
l5
l5
25
l5
25
t24
138
120
RPD
RPD Limit
U - Not detected above the MDL B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
J - Analyte detected below the pel- g _ Result is outside ofquantitation rangc
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
l5
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for reguratory compriance.
D-57
1645 West22O0south . saltlakecity,utah 84llg . 800_973_6724
&mr,fy,rr&*mf ffimp*rd
ReportNumber: 0209049-l
DateReportedt 09119102
Work Order: 0209049
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
QC Type: Matrix Spike
SampleID: 0209065-05bms
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l, l-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichl oroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Result
780
755
810
I 040
740
1970
2200
1900
Analysis Date: 09/17102 12:47
Prep Batch ID: R32737
Spike True percent
Parent Value Recovery
Units: pglL
Seq No: 373801
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limit
129
r29
l6t
143
130
t24
r38
120
Low
Limit
U
U
U
U
U
800 97.s 59.1800 94.4 61.8800 lot 32.7800 130 59800 92.5 60
2000 98.3 68.12000 110 60.42000 95.2 76.4
0
0
0
QC Type: Matrix Spike Duplicate
SampleID: 0209065-05bmsd
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroahene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Result
772
772
820
r 130
7s6
1930
2180
1930
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
U
U
U
U
09/17102 13:07
R32737
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limil
800 96.5 59.1800 96.4 61.8800 103 32.7800 142 s9800 94.s 60
2000 96.6 68.12000 109 60.42000 96.7 76.4
Units: pE/L
Seq No: 373802
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Lindt
129 780 1.0 28129 755 2.2 21161 810 1.2 18143 1040 8.4 23130 740 2.t t6
124
138
120
0
0
0
U - Not derected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel.
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions of this report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
t6
D-58
I 645 West 2200 south . salt Lake city, urah 84119 . 800_973-6724
ffirumfffi*wf W*p*r*
ReportNumber: 0209049-l
Date Reported t 09119/02
Work Order: 0209049
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
QC Type: Laboratory Control Spike
Sample ID: 020917w1
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
I , I -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane{4
Toluene-d8
Result
18.8
I8.8
19.7
19.0
18.1
48. I
54.5
48.1
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
09117/02 ll:26
Ri2737
True Percent
Value Recovery
20.0 94.020.0 94.220.0 98.4
20.0 9s.l20.0 90.7
50.0 96.350.0 109
50.0 96.3
Units: ttgL
Seq No: 374005
Duplicate
Parent
Low HighLimit Limit
RPD
RPD Limit
59.1
61.8
32.7
59
60
68. I
60.4
76.4
129
129
l6l
143
130
124
138
120
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
B - Analye derccted in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD ouside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory conrpliance.
D-59
1645 West 2200 Soutlr . Salt Lake Ciry, Urah B4ltg . 800_973-6724
ffimmfSrff*mf ffimpmrd
ReportNumber: 0209049-l
DateReported: 09119102
Work Order: 0209049
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: 020917wb
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I , I -Dichloroethane
I , I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Result
U
U
0.60Js(lb)
U
U
U
U
U
3.0J
47.9
54.3
47.1
AnalysisDate: 09/1710212:0j
Prep Batch ID: R32737
Spike
Parent
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
50.0 95.950.0 109
50.0 94.1
Units: ltE/L
Seq No: 374006
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RpD Limit
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
68.1 12460.4 13876.4 120lb: The concentration in the blank is less than 5% ofthe regulatory limit for this analyte.
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside of quantitarion range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
l8
D-60
1645 Wesr2200south . Saltlake City, Utah g4llg . EOO-I73_6724
#ramfpr$,rmmf ffi*pmnd
Quality Control Summary
Clientr The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ReportNumber: 02O9O4g-l
DateReported: 09119102
Work Order: O2O9O4}
QC Type: TCLp Blank
Sample ID: tblk9740
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,1 -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l,l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
SpikeResult parent
U0U0
0.63 BJ 0U0U0U0U0
48.8
54.6
48.0
0911710213:54
Ri2737
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
50.0 97.s 68.150.0 109 60.450.0 96.0 76.4
Units: ltCfi-
Seq No: 374007
High DuplicateLimit Parent
25
t5
l5
l5
25
l5
25
124
138
120
RPD
RPD Limit
0
0
0
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Rcsult is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Ildividual pages or portions ofthis report may not bc separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-61
l9
1645 West2200 South . Salttake City,Utah B4ll9 . 800_973-6724
ffiram$pfrmmd ffim#m#
ReportNumber: O2O9O49-1
Date Reported z 09119102
Work Order: 0209049
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
TCLP Blank
tblk9784
HP-6_020917A
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
09117102 16:55
R32737
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low HighLimit Limit
Units: pClL
Seq No: 374016
Duplicate RpDParent RPD Limit
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,1 -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
I , I , I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dS
ResuIt
U
U
UB
U
U
U
5.82
47.9
56.3
48.5
Spike
Parent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
l5
l5
15
25
l5
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50.0 95.7 68.1 12450.0 I 13 60.4 13850.0 97.0 76.4 120
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte dctected below the pel-
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limitsNC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are lcss than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-63
20
oo
EToEIo.>t!c
oo0,.:oooG
a,
E
o)of
U'
+
oI
\xihC
ooJ \
\
*+
Ea95rg?t 33r.
vt9s?uzt ssrd
I / g s ! c z ! rsJd
otro
(,,LoE
.gf,oCLaoco
E
E0
C)
E l I g r e z I rord
o i 9 s I e z t sc'd
v z 9 g ! u z I '33rd
I ' I L C Z ! rerd
o66I 2 I S r 0 z I 'sarJ
8199!EZt s€rd
oEo,c
.9,3o
.EoG
fi
gl9etezt 8cl/ooh l^ar99tEzl'sard
sJautBluoc lo lequnN
d
:
tr
s
o
E'oE
,B
J.tt\r
AD\i
cloi:lol\l>rlcldIol
EIolol
x
.EE
eseqd-41ny1
prnb5 oue0lg
snoenby x x x x
o).:
G?oq
E(L
9..:;F
*cAfi-HHcorrz!.zZo:,i;;;;i;
p!tos
(
\
E\
t
=
epsodr.rio3
qBle ><x x )<
idt
sl rgl d
\It
5lo
ulEl .:(!lo
=l=ol ool 0)l6'l '6'i
(Ll o_l
1'cttr6
o
ota
ase
sI
h
c6
oto:0,ooE
(
oE
i=trcfo
Ec
F
G
(!o
EIE
ol6lPl tEl 3,rrl tr
r
-5*Et;
=9i3jtF; Y
,351,avzEEaEE &odJEsi5
F 62
i;s
1'696oo
-oo
n
s
d
stc
$1i
Ns
J
sr
co
Eg
=c!,!g
CL
Eoo
n
Ig
3
Ttq
3
r0
tq
3
I
Idl
!,
E
''f.
\
oocl
Na
l
J
tro
au
E
oc
oa!
oo
,o-oEoo.c)E
(u
E
t.r.t
oco-cL
x(dtl-
oo
EDE
ot0,
.9tEsotr
h\
t
E
I
)
GI (o t 6 (o N @ o,o N g)
! :>\,VEI ]J!i(,o; -: ll-$at--i.-r I 3lcoi Y =iro, i U
ic.r, 5 TI eg.
| !=cdI IEC!,,8o
6
IN5
o@
,IE
9s
bog.Eo2
@t5 'i,()€
JE
?a5ii
83"8=
6
=
oE
E.EP
)o
=.a$ii!al.a
ci::,
D64
Mountain States Analyticat, LLC
Oient Name: T{E R(rid ritorap
Canier: z( rF.l-f
Sample Receipt Checklist
Work fuer No.(jilcrcrtci
C,anier Number:
Cooler InformaHon: Non-Rad
Cooler Sealed (taped):
Custody Seals present:
ludlum Model 3 Serial # Ludlum Model 2929 Scaler seriar *_-" "' ^qM' q-
Smear Results; Cooter: d_/p_ Inner pkg: d /BTransportrndex(t meterruoingforyelowuauronryy
-/LI;;-
samples: q--/p
cooler l{umber/rD:
'D?r'a surface Radioacflvity Reading (if required)
-
mRyhrCondiUon ofShipping Container: Good f Fair O Damaged (explain)
Exempttr Whlt€Itr t to*rtO
Yestr ruoE Not Applicabte tr pID Reading ppmYes O NoE Not Appticabte OInhctQ BrokenEl Seal Number:
Icep Blue loe tr None0 Other:State of Coolant:Frozanfisqls v, wrour. r{ozen y partially Frozen O Melted trTemperature: ?'oc(- ThermometerlD: Aoi| conection rfur: d TernpBlanklnduded: vesp Hoo
PackirgDescripflon: l(f.
cha in-of-cu stoai tn roEffiil
COC Present:vo{ Notr O0rer:COC Number(s): .
COC signed (relinquished and received):
COC agrees with sample labels:
YesO Notr
YesO NoO
Not Applicable tr
Not Applicable O
Sample fnformation:
Custody Seals present:
Sample containers inbct:
Samples in proper containers:
Suffi cient sample volume:
All samples received in hold Urne:
Water - VOA's have zero headspace:
pre-preserved with HO: p
Notes:
Yestr NoE
Intacttr BrokenD
YesE NooYesE NooYesE Noov*il No o
Not Applicable O Other
Seal Number(s)
Yes d No o Not Applicabte o
Pre-preserved wittr Na2S2O3: tr Non-Preserved: O
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt ysp
HNO3 = (t HrSOr =
Water - pH adjusted: (MSAI Tracking
HNO.
Adjusted (see comrnents below) O
NaOH =
Not Appllcable O
ZnAC /NaOH =HCL =
No.)
H:SOr
ZnAC NaOH
OtherNa2SO2O]
Notest
Cooler Contents Inspected & Verified By:
Date:Q-tr-c:-
D-6s
rime: ltp$ Revtewed ,16
1645 West2200South . Saltlakeciry,Urah B4llg . 800-973_6724
.tlL..I. aa. aaa.aa..aaa.a...aaa
September 19,2002
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
(801) 359-30s9 Fax: (801) 3sg_3307
Project:CHWMF
ffirr*f3rfr*mf ffim#qp#
Work Order:0209039
Dear Mr. Mark Roeinske.
Aank yorr for using Mountain states Analytical, LLC (MSA) as your environmentalinforrnation resource. our reports are designed to meei the iertifred Laboratory ReportrngRequirements of utah Administrative codi R444-14-lz(10) and the National EnvironmentalLaboratory Accreditation program (NELAP), Section S.i:. '
This is Report Number o2o9o3g-l and contains 21 pages of information for the 5 samplessubmiued to MSA on Thlrsday, September 05,2002."Any sample receipt documentationdetailed in the work order Receipt summary of this ,.port 1e.g, cnain-of-custody, workorder Authorization, etc.) and/or analytical results oot"d u, )'si attached. ', are inciuded byreference as attachments following pa"ge 21. For regulatory "o-pri*ce reporting, individualpages or portions of this report may not be separated. Except as noted, the test results for themethods and parameters listed on MSA's most recent NELAC certification letter meet allrequirements of NELAC.
If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this report, please feel free tocontact me at [phone] ext.3026 or by e-mail at [e-mail].
Mountain States Analytical, LLC
Rolf E. Larsen
Senior Project Manager
D.66
1645 West22oosouth . saltlake city,utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
&rxmfy$r*mf ffiep*r$
ReportNumber: 0209039-l
Date Reported: 09/tr9102
Work Order: 0209039
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Lab Sample ID Ctient Sample ID
Sample Summary
Additional Sample Information Date Collected
0209039-0lA
0209039-0lB
0209039-02A
0209039-028
0209039-03A
0209039-03B
0209039-04A,
0209039-048
0209039-05A
wQ-6
wQ-6
wQ-2
wQ-2
EQB
EQB
wQ-t
wQ-1
Trip Blank
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
09/05t02
09/05/02
09/05t02
09105t02
09/05t02
09/05/02
09/05t02
09t05t02
09t05t02
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-67
1645 West2200 South . Saltlake City,Utah g4tlg . 800-9.13-6724
Amad3rfr*mf ffiep*nf
Ilolding Time Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Sample ID Client Sample ID
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
0209039-l
09/19t02
0209039
Date Collected
0209039-0lA WQ-6
Parameter
Metals byICP
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09/1210214:00
09t05/02 71..30
HT Analysis Date HT
0911210219:33 t80
0209039-018 WQ-6
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09105/02 ll:30
IIT Analysis Date HT
o9lt7t02 30
09117102 17:.55 t4
0209039-02A
Parameter
Metals by ICP
wQ-2
HT Prep Date
09/12/02 14:00
0910510213:35
HT Analysis Date HT
09/12102 19:37 180
Leachate
Start Date End Date
0209039-028 wQ-2
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09/05/02 t3:35
HT Analysis Date HT
09/17t02 30
09117/02 18:15 t4
0209039-03A
Parameter
Metals by ICP
EQB 09/05102 l4:ss
HT Analysis Date HT
09112102 19:42 180
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09/12/02 14:00
0209039-03B
Parameter
EQB
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
0209039-04A
Parameter
Leachate
Start Date End Date
Leachate
Start Date End Date
HT Prep Date HT
HT Prep Date
09105/02 14,,55
Analysis Date HT
09n7t02 30
09117/02 t7:35 t4
09105/02 l4:45
Analysis Date HTHT
wQ-1
t - The recommended holding time was exceeded
Individuat pages or ponions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance,
D-68
.?t
I 645 West 2200 Soutlr . Salt Lake City, Urah 84119 . 800-973-6124
&ramf3r$r*mfl ffimp*n€
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
0209039-l
09/19t02
0209039
Holding Time Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Sample ID Client Sample ID
Date Collected
Metals by ICP 09/12/02 l4:0o 09/12/0219:45 180
0209039-048 wQ_l
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
0910510214:45
HT Analysis Date HT
09n7t02 30
0911710218:35 t4
0209039-05A Trip Blank
Parameter
Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA
Volatiles
Leachate
Start Date End Date HT Prep Date
09t05t02
HT Analysis Date
09n7/02
09117/02 17 15
HT
30
14
+ - The recommended holding time was exceeded
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-69
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Iake City, Utah B4ltg . 800-973_6724
ffinmf3r$r*mf ffimp*r#
ReportNumber: 0209039-l
Date Reported: 09119/02
Work Order: 0209039
LabSampleID: 020q039-0lA
Client Sample I Dr{Wa/=
DateCottected: Wosrcz
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
suite 2006
Salt Lake Ciry, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
r"$
09105/0216:15
Water
25296
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 3005A:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
9775
Metals by ICP, Water
09112/0214:00
09/12/0219:33
BBO
0.0r 0.05 mgL DGW
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PeL
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-70
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
,4mmfyfrmmf ffimwm#
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209039-1
09/19102
0209039
0209039-0lB
rtrR\
09/05/02
09/05/02 l6:15
Water
25296
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax [phone]
CHWMF
v"$Y
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <21
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
0.001
0.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 5
I 15
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-120
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l,l -Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, 1 -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroettrane-d4
Toluene-d8
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
98.8
t12
96.3
ttdL
ttgL
ItgL
ILE/L
ItgL
ttE/L
ILyL
pgL
ttgL
oZ Recovery
o/o Recovery
o/o Recovery
09fi7t02 CMS
0911110217:55 CMS
09117/02 11:.55 CMS
09/17102 17:,55 CMS
09117102 17:55 CMS
09117/0217:55 CMS
09111/02 17:55 CMS
0911710217:55 CMS
0911710217:55 CMS
0911710217,55 CMS
09/1710217:55 CMS
0911710217:55 CMS
09/17102 17:55 CMS
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Anallte detected below the pel.
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
ktdividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-71
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake City, Utah
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake ciry, LIr 84101
a LL
84119 . 800-973-6724
&mmdpflmm$ #ffwpmr*
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209039-l
09/19/02
0209039
o2w-02^
WO'
09/05/0216:15
Water
25296
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 30054:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 6010B:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
9:775
Metals by ICP, Water
0911210214:00 BBO
09/1210219:37 DGW0.01 0.05 mglL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel,
t - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
o-72
1645 West2200 South . Saltlake City,Utah B4ttg . 800_973_6724
&xxw#Vr*f*mf ffiwpm#
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
i 75 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake Ciry, UT 84101
801,359-3059 Fax: 801_359_3307
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
0209039-l
09n9t02
0209039
02.()9039-02BZ\(tf,ro-z\\_v
09/05/02
O9/05102 l6:15
Water
25296
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA. Water
Approximate pH
SW-846 5030B/82608: Volatiles,Water
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l,l -Dichloroethane
l,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
1, 1, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
<2J
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
98. I
1r8
94.5
0.001
0.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.s 50.5 50.5 5
I 15
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-120
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
09/17/02
09/17102 18:t5 CMS
0911710218:15 CMS
09117/0218:t5 CMS
09117/02 18:15 CMS
09117/0218:15 CMS
09117/0218:15 CMS
0911"110218:15 CMS
0911710218:t5 CMS
09117/021815 CMS
09117/02 18:15 CMS
09/17/02 18:15 CMS
0911710218:15 CMS
CMS
LtElL
ttElL
pclL
ItClL
ttgL
ILdL
pdL
ttgL
pe/L
oZ Recovery
oZ Recovery
oZ Recovery
U - Not derected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel-
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitarion range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance
D-73
.@rrafyfrmmf ffiwp*#1645 West 2200 south . Salt Lake city, utah 84tlg . 800_973-6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt lake City, t T 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 80t-359_3307
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209039-l
09/19t02
0209039
0209039-03A
/6a.ilVt,o,
09/05/021615
Water
25296
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF'Date Analyzed Analyst
sw-846 3005A:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
97',l5
Metals by ICP, Water
09ll2lo214:00
09112/0219:42
BBO
DGW0.01U 0.05 mgtL
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel
r - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-74
1645 West 2200 South . Salt t ake City, Utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
suite 2006
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209039-t
09/19/02
0209039
0209-0]9-03Bffi)\6snz
09/051021615
Water
25296
ffirwa,$3*fs*wf ffimffm#
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
801_359_3059 Fax: [phone]
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 J
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
Benzene
Carbon tehachloride
Chloroform
I ,1 -Dichloroethane
l,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
I , I , I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
0.001
0.5 5o.s 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 5
I15
Recovery Range
68. l-l 24
60.4- 138
76.4-120
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
09/17t02
09117/0217:35 CMS
09117/02 17:35 CMS
09/1710217:35 CMS
09117/02 17:35 CMS
09117102 17:35 CMS
09/17/0217,35 CMS
09/17/02 17'.35 CMS
091t710217:35 CMS
09/1710217:35 CMS
09117/021'7:35 CMS
09/17/0217:35 CMS
09117102 17.35 CMS
CMS
U
U
0.63 BJ
U
U
U
U
U
UB
97.0
lt0
95.4
ttgL
ttClL
pdL
ttdL
trE/L
pdL
pgL
ILdL
ttdL
o/o Recovery
% Recovery
oZ Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the pel.
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analye detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory conrpriance.
D-75
Smmfy#rmmf ffimp*M
I 645 West 2200 South . salt Lake city, Utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake City, UT 8410I
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
0209039-l
091t9/02
0209039
qjry{J-04^g9
09105102
09105102l615
Water
25296
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed . Analyst
sw-846 3005A:
Prep Batch ID:
sw-846 60108:
Chromium
Flame/hrlCP Prep, Water
9775
Metals by ICP, Water
0.0r 0.05 mdL
09/121021400
09112102 19:45
BBO
DGW
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside of quantitation rangc
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
ll
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-76
..:S..:l:h Mountain States Analyticat. LLC
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Iake city, Utah s4llg , 800_973-6724
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
Salt Lake Cify, UT 84101
801-359-3059 Fax: 801-359_3307
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
0209039-l
09/t9/02
0209039
0209039-048qe/
09/05/02
09105102 l6:15
Water
2s296
&xz Fp-r,lcmf ffi*per#
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH <2 t
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles,Water
0.001
0.5 5
0.5 50.5 50.5 50.5 5
0.5 50.5 50.5 5
115
Recovery Range
68.t-124
60.4-138
76.4-t20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
09n7t02
09117/02 18.35 CMS
09117/0218:35 CMS
09/17/02 18:35 CMS
0911710218:35 CMS
09/17lO218:35 CMS
0911710218:35 CMS
09/1710218:35 CMS
09117/02 18:35 CMS
09t1710218:35 CMS
09/17/02 18:35 CMS
09117102 18:35 CMS
0911710218.35 CMS
CMS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,1 -Dichloroethane
l,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
97.8
ll3
95.3
pdL
qLC/L
ttdL
ItdL
PE|L
ILqL
ttgL
ttdL
1LCIL
oZ Recovery
o/o Recovery
oZ Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the pel,
+ - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantiution range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limis
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
o-77
1645 West 2200 Sou0r . Salt Iake City, Utah B4llg . BOO-9734724
&ram#yf'r*mf ffimpmrd
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
Lab Sample ID:
Client Sample [D:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix:
COC ID:
Client: Mr. Mark Roginske
The RETEC Group
175 West 200 South
Suite 2006
salt Iake city, uT 84I01
801-359-3059 Fax: [phone]
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
Purchase Order:
0209039-l
09119102
0209039
ffise(TripBlaJk
Woz
09/05102 l6:15
Water
25296
Parameter Result MDL PQL Units DF Date Analyzed Analyst
: Preservative pH Check - GCMS VOA, Water
Approximate pH
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Water
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I , 1-Dichloroethane
l, I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
I , I , I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
4T
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
U
UB
95.7
lll
94.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
I
0.001
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
l5
Recovery Range
68.1-124
60.4-138
76.4-120
09n1to2 cMs
0911710217:15 CMS
0911710217 15 CMS
09ll'110217:-15 CMS
09117/02 17:.15 CMS
09117102 17:15 CMS
09117102 17:15 CMS
09/1710217:15 CMS
0911710217:15 CMS
09ll7lo2 t7:15 CMS
09117/0217:15 CMS
0911710217:.15 CMS
0911710217:15 CMS
ttdL
pdL
ttdL
$dL
pgL
ILqL
ttgL
ttdL
ttg/L
o/o Recovery
oZ Recovery
oZ Recovery
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte det@ted below the PeL
* - Result is greater than the associated action level
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
t3
htdividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-78
..:l.t:l:$. Mountain States Analytical. LLC
1645 West220Osouth . Saltlakeciry,urah 84119 . 800_973_6724
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ffirrmf3rfr{;ffi# WffiW#{*
ReportNumber: 0209039-l
Date Reported: 09/19/02
Work Order: 0209039
SW-846 60108: Metals by ICp, Water
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: PBW-9775
RunID: TJA6IE_020912E
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.0049
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
0
09112102 18:31
9775
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
0 0 -0.02
Units: mgL
Seq No: 372498
High Duplicate RPDLimit Parent RPD Limit
0.0r
QC Type: Laboratory Control Sample (Water)
Sample ID: LCSW-9775
Run ID: TJA61E 0209128
Analysis Date: 09112102 18:33
Prep Batch ID: 9775
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.413
Spike
Parent
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 t03
Units: mglL
Seq No: 372499
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
Low
Limit
75
High
Limit
125
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Sample Duplicate
0209026-0tB D
TJA61E 0209t2F'
Analysis Date: 09112102 18:39
Prep Batch ID: 9'775
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: mgL
Seq No: 372501
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
UNC20
Result
U
Spike
Parenl
Low
Limit
High
Limit
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-79
14
I 645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake city, Utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
,&ram$yfrmmf ffimp*r$
ReportNumber: 0209039-l
Date Reported: 09119102
Work Order: 0209039
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike
0209026-0lB MS
TJA6IE_020912E
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
09112102 18:41
9775
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 100
Result
0.401
Low HighLimit Limit
75 t25
Units: mglL
Seq No; 372502
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Matrix Spike Duplicate
0209026-018 MSD
TJA6tE_020912E
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
09112102 18:43
9775
True Percent
Value Recovery
0.400 l0r
Result
0.403
Low HighLimit Limit
75 125
Units: mg[-
Seq No: 372503
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
0.401 0.63 20
QC Type: Post Digestior/Distillation Spike
Sample ID: 0209026-018 A
Run ID: TJA6IE O209l2E
Analysis Date:
Prep Batch ID:
Spike
Parent
U
0911210218:45
9775
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
0.400 98.5 7 5
Units: mdL
Seq No: 372504
High Duplicate RPDLimit Parent RPD Limit
t25
Parameter
Chromium
Result
0.394
QC Type:
Sample ID:
Run ID:
Parameter
Chromium
Serial Dilution
0209026-0lB L
TJA6lE_0209t28
Analysis Date: 09112102 18:49
Prep Batch ID: 9'775
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: mElL
Seq No: 372505
Duplicate o/oD
Parent YoD Limit
UNCIO
Result
Spike
Parent
Low
Limit
High
Limit
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquanritation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory cornpliance.
D-80
l5
&,.aO a.aa.t tain ,&rumd3rfr*mf ffi*pmrdcalLL
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ReportNumber: 0209039-l
Date Reported: 09119102
Work Order: 0209039
1645 West2200South Saltl,akeCity,Utah S4ll9 . 800-973-6724
SW-846 50308/82608: Volatiles, Extract
QC Type: TCLP Blank
Sample ID: tblk9766
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,1 -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
1 , 1, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date: 09117102 11:41
Prep Batch ID: R32737
True Percent
Value Recovery
Units: pgL
Seq Nor 373798
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
Low HighLimit Limit
U
U
UB
U
U
U
U
49.2
54.7
48.3
Spike
Parent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50.0 98.550.0 r0950.0 96.s
25
l5
l5
l5
25
l5
25
68.1 124
60.4 138
76.4 120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outsidc ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-81
l6
Srcmrydr*mf ffimpm-{
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ReportNumber: 0209039-l
Date Reported: 09/l9l02
Work Order: 0209039
1645 West 2200 South . Salt [^ake city, urah 84119 . 800-973-6724
QC Type: Matrix Spike
SampleID: 0209065-05bms
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l,l -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date: 09117/02 1247
Prep Batch ID: R32737
Spike True Percent LowParent Value Recovery Limit
U
U
U
U
U
800
800
800
800
800
2000
2000
2000
91.5 59.1
94.4 61.8
l0l 32j
130 5992.5 60
98.3 68.1
110 60.49s.2 76.4
Units: pgL
Seq No: 373801
Duplicate RPDParent RPD LimitResult
780
755
810
I 040
740
1970
2200
1900
129
t29
l6l
143
130
t24
138
120
High
Limit
0
0
0
QC Type: Matrix Spike Duplicate
SampleID: 0209065-05bmsd
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l,l -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dS
Analysis Date: 0911'7102 13:.07
Prep Batch ID: R32137 I
Spike
Parent
U
U
U
U
U
0
0
0
800 96.5800 96.4
800 103800 t42
800 94.s
2000 96.62000 109
2000 96.7
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
Units: ILCIL
Seq No: 373802
Duplicate RPDParent RPD Limit
780 LA755 2.2
810 1.2
1040 8.4
740 2.1
High
LimitResult
772
772
820
I 130
7s6
1930
2180
1930
59.1
61.8
32.7
s9
60
68.1
60.4
76.4
t29
129
161
143
130
124
138
120
2q_ _
2t
l8
23
16
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD ouside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-82
17
..:.$..:Mo &rawfy#r*mf ffiwpmrf
1645 West2200 South . SaltlakeCity,Utatr B4ll9 . 800_973_6724
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ReportNumber: 0209039-1
Date Reported: 09119/02
Work Order: 0209039
QC Type: Laboratory Control Spike
Sample ID: 020917w1
RunID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
l,l -Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date: 09117102 1l:26
Prep Batch ID: R32737
Units: lLgL
Seq No: 374005
High Duplicate RpDLimit Parent RPD Limit
129
129
l6l
143
130
124
138
t20
Spike
Parent
True Percent
Value Recovery
Low
LimitResult
18.8
18.8
19.7
19.0
I 8.1
48.1
54.5
48.1
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
94.0 59.194.2 61.8
98.4 32.7
95.1 5990.7 60
96.3 68.1
109 60.4
96.3 76.4
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analytc detected below the PeL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD ouside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report nray not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
l8
D-83
&ffmfP*frmxf ffiwP*rd
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ReportNumber: 0209039-1
Date Reported: 09/19102
Work Order: 0209039
1645 West 2200 South . Salt Lake city, utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
QC Type: Method Blank
Sample ID: 020917wb
Run ID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
I , I -Dichloroethane
1 , I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l,l, l-Trichloroethane
Toluene
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Result
U
U
0.60JS(lb)
U
U
U
U
U
3.0 J
47.9
54.3
47.1
68.1 124
60.4 138
76.4 t20
Analysis Date: 09ll'1102 12:07
Prep Batch ID: R32737
Spike
Perent
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
50.0 95.9
50.0 109
50.0 94.1
Units: pClL
Seq No: 374006
High Duplicate RPDLimit Parent RPD Limit
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
lb: The concentration in the blank is less than 5% ofthe regulatory limit for this analyte.
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analye detected below the PQL
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
ktdividual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-84
l9
&,aaa aaaa.r
ffiramf3rfr**xd ffi*p*r#
1645 West2200South . SaltlakeCiry,Utah 84119 . 800-973-6724
Quality Control Summary
Client: The RETEC Group
Project: CHWMF
Project ID:
ReportNumber: 0209039-l
Date Reportedz O9ll9l02
Work Order: 02090f9
QC Type: TCLP Blank
Sample ID: tblk9740
RUnID: HP-6_020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l, I -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
l, l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date: 09117102 13:54
Prep Batch ID: R32737
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
Units: lLgL
SeqNo:374007
Duplicate RPDParent RPD LimitResult
U
U
0.63 BJ
U
U
U
U
48.8
54.6
48_0
Spike
Parent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
High
Limit
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50.0
50.0
50.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
97.5
109
96.0
68. I
60.4
76.4
25
l5
I5
l5
25
l5
25
124
138
120
U - Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
B - Analyte detected in the associarcd Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or portions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-85
l645West2200 Soudr . Saltlake City,Utah 841t9 . 800-973-6724
,&mmfyfr*mf ffiwp*#
Report Number:
Date Reported:
Work Order:
0209039-l
09n9t02
0209039
Quality Control Summary
Client:
Project:
Project ID:
TheRETEC Group
CHWMF
QC Type: TCLP Blank
Sample ID: tblk9784
Run ID: HP-6*020917A
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
l,l -Dichloroethene
Ethylbenzene
I , l, I -Trichloroethane
Toluene
Surrogates
Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-d8
Analysis Date: 09117/02 16,.55
Prep Batch ID: P€2737
True Percent Low
Value Recovery Limit
Units: pdL
Seq No: 374016
Duplicate RPDParent RPD LimitResult
U
U
UB
U
U
U
s.82
47.9
56.3
48.5
Spike
Parent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50.0
50.0
50.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95.7
ll3
97.0
High
Limit
25
15
l5
l5
25
l5
25
68.1 12460.4 138'76.4 120
U ' Not detected above the MDL
J - Analyte detected below the PQL
B - Analyt€ detected in the associated Method Blank
E - Result is outside ofquantitation range
S -Results outside normal recovery limits
R - RPD outside normal precision limits
NC - Not Calculated: Duplicate value(s) are less than the MDL
Individual pages or fortions ofthis report may not be separated and presented for regulatory compliance.
D-86
2t
oo
ETotrgo.>Gtr(
oEo
oooE
o(t
au
+
o;
g
qil
(-)c dc(t
$
I I I g t C Z I lari
I r I E , t Z l ',toJd
otro
o5
o
=ooo
ELooE
o
E
Eoo
I Z 9 5 ? E Z I sord
I I -o I I C Z r .rerd
8 / I I t E Z | ',serd
o
E
u z I s , I z I lard
I 4 9 S ? C Z | '49/d
o6oar99ttzt sarr
a I I S t e z t ierd
ot,o
!oEtrtr6E
J')k X ((I I I S ' elzlrvtardaQ^x x X xEZ9t5)'eZtNE6rd
srsurEluoc p JequnN :t $\f,
{L
\a
->S
Ag
-9o
E(!
U)
IIt
"6
N\'\\\
\-lY
Eo
o
g6o
Eoo
x
!'
asPqd{lnn
p!nbn que6ro
GE snoenbv x v x o
(d
aooo)
TL
o;V9.St-u_\ede{-66Ecz-46966tor-zTzzo
-NO90@N@
p!tos
lo.E,o.lot)oE
\
J
x
()
g.l aNodruoc
>(x
s
,-lo
4c.
tr
u
f\c(
G
\Jtrg
Itlr.
d
UsI
-.,:
a
r]
d
o
E
gE
o
(6E
U)
(uc)
trtr
ol
(UlEILkl e(,)l EI
E
P
I
8-
.?
I)s
=I6E?i
E*9o;:
E!lo
5h*q
r€
gE
4E
59
!
I
II
t
Ic't
s
I
a\
\
f.
It {
0tI
\c
3
o
Et:v+
.9
G
E
c
E
()(!
tr0o
p
o
oaotr
(o
E
tll
o,co
0-
x(5
TL
(r,o0)
E
o6o
LA-
I
oEo
Irc5o{
l
T
d
N C.,$rr,(o N @ o o N c)
ifFo=6ofu-OV,Eg
CO
EtrO ,C,:op:A
=6E-
,Eo
@FNI
oo
,fE
q@
o.9@:
5E
5ul5,o€
JEEi?t
6€83
3
C)l-
(E(,'Ei->(EE
ao-tna
E(E+,tr
o
=.3iit
{iii:
D-87
Mountain States Analytical, LLC
Oient Name: TltE RErr,n tlcor^o
Sample Receipt Chec-klist
Work Order No.
Canier Number:
cooler Information: ilon-Rad P Ecmpt o whtte r o yeltow rr o ye[ow ru o AI-ARA: a_/ F
Ludlurn Model 3 Serlal #_ LuJlum Model 2929 Scaler Serial #
smear ResulE: cooler: c- /p- Inner plrg: d_/p_ samples: s_/g
Transport Index (1 meter reading for yellow U & III only) mR/hr
Cooler l{umber/ID :__3tA_
Condition of Shipping Conbiner: Good d
Surface Radioactivity Reading (lf requlred) _ mvhr
Fair D Damaged (exdain)
Cooler Sealed (taped):
Custody Seals Present:
Yeso Nod
Yestr Hod
Inbct O &oken El
Not Applicable tr
Coolant:leil Blue Ie O None o Other:
Sfate of Coolant: Frozen f partially Frozen tr
Temperafure: I. o"(- TlrennometerID: 7.otQ,
Not Applicable O PID Reading _ ppm
Mdted O
Conection factor: _ f Temp Blank lrduded: yes O noF
Seal Number:
Packing Description:
Chain-Of-Custody Information :
COC Pment:
COC Number(s): .
COC dgned (relinqui$red and received):
@C agrees wlth sample labels:
v"sfi Noe?tfrt Oher:
Yesfi NotrYesB Nod
tlqt Applicable tr
Not Applicable O
Notes:
nlnl Ll<.rEr\ 6{ -rH( Cru. .
Sample Information:
Samples lnduded ln cooler:
-z /v{\
Ea e./ra\
Crrstody Seals Present:
Samde aontaineE intact:
Samples ln proper contalners:
Sufi ciefl t sample volume:
AII samples received in hold time:
YesO NoF
Intacto Brokentr
vesd Noovesd NotrYnF NooYoF No tr
Not Applicable O Other
Seal Number(s)
Water - VOAs have zero headspace: v* y' No tr Not Applicable o
Pre-preserved wittr HO: y' ite.preserved with NaZS2O3; O Non-Preserved: tr
Nots:
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt yes y'Mjusted (see commenls below) O Not Applicable O
111'19, = { 7- H:SOr =NaOH =ZnAC /NaOH =HCL =
Water - pH adjusted: (MSAI Tncking
HNor
--
ZnAC Na2SO2O!
Notes:
No.)
H:SOr NaOH
Otrter
C.ooler C,ontents Inspscted & Verified By:
Date: 4.{.o7. Time. r)o, Revtewed uv: FFfl oak,, QI:\OL
D-88
RETEC ANALYTICAL DATA VERIFICATON CHECKLIST
Project Name: Closed Hazardous Waste
Management Facility
Laboratory: Mountain States Analytical, lnc. (Salt Lake
City, UT)
Project Reference: April 2002 Sample Matrix: Groundwaterwith Water QC
RETEC Project No.: AM072 -157 17 -722 Sample Start Date: 04101102
Verified By/Date Verified: Tammie Lind 06/08/02 Sample End Date: 04102102
Reviewed By: Sue Milcan Review Date:06111102
COC # :Samples Analyzed
24461: WQ-s and WQ-4
24462: WQ-3, WQ-2, WQ6, EQB, WQ-1, 5-16, and Trip Blank
Parameters Validated: Volatile Organics by GC/MS by SW8a6 Method 82608 and Totat Chromium by SWg46Method 60108.
Laboratory Project lDs: 020415 and 0204038
PRECISION, ACCURACY, METHOD COMPLIANCE, AND COMPLETENESS ASSESSMENT
Precision:x Acceptable Unacceptable TL lnitials
Comments: Precision is the measure of variability of individual sample measurements. Field precision was
determined by comparison of field duplicate sample results. Laboratory precision was determined by examination oflaboratory duplicate results. Evaluation of both field and laboratory duplicates for precision was done using the
Relative Percent Difference (RPD). The RPD is defined as the difference between two dupticate samples divid6d bythe mean and expressed as a percent. Field duplicate RPD QC limits were set at 0-30% for water samples.Laboratory RPD limits referenced EPA published QC limits. No data require qualification based upon field andlaboratory precision measurements, and overall field and laboratory precision is acceptable. precision
measurements are reviewed in items 17 and 21.
Accuracy:x Acceptable Unacceptable TL lnitials
Comments: Field accuracy, a measure of the sampling bias, was determined by reviewing equipment rinse blankand trip blank sample results for evidence of sample contamination stemming from field aitivities or sampletransport. Laboratory accuracy is a measure of the system bias, and was measured by evaluating laboratory controlsample/laboratory control sample duplicate (LCS/LCSD), matrix spike/matrix spike duflicate (MS/MSD), and organicsystem monitoring compounds (surrogate) percent recoveries (%Rs). LCS/LCSD %Rs, which demonstratel theoverall performance of the analysis, were compared to EPA published QC limits. MS/MSD %Rs, which provided
information on sample matrix interferences, were compared to EPA published QC limits or laboratory controichartedlimits. System monitoring compound or surrogate recoveries, which measured system performanie and efficiency
during organic analysis, were compared to EPA published QC limits. No data require qualification based on fieldand laboratory accuracy measurements, and overall field and laboratory accuracy is acceptable. Accuracy
measurements are reviewed in items 12,14,15, and 16.
Method Compliance:x Acceptable Unacceptable TL lnitials
Comments: Method compliance was determined by evaluating sample integrity, holding time, and laboratory blanksagainst method specified requirements, while applying EPA data validation guidelines. No data require qualification
based on the data provided, and overall method compliance is acceptable for this level of review. Method
compliance measurements are reviewed in items 4,8,11, 13, 18, 1g, and 20.
Completeness:x Acceptable Unacceptable TL lnitials
Comments: Completeness is the overall ratio of the number of samples planned versus the number of samples with
valid analyses. Completeness goals are set at 90-100%. Determination of completeness included a review of chainof custody records, laboratory analytical methods and detection limits, laboratory case narratives, and project
requirements. Completeness also included 100% review of the laboratory sample data results and QC summaryreports. All of the data received from the laboratory are useable without qualification. Completeness of the data is
calculated to be 100% and is acceptable.
Page 1 of 4
D-89
06t09t2002
VERIFICATION CRITERIA CHECK
Data Evaluation flags used in this review:
No flags were used in this review.
1. Was the laboratory narrative free of non-
conformances related to the analytical results?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Explanation: The laboratory narratives were free of non+onformance issues.
2. Were sample Chain-of-Custody forms complete?x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: GOC records from field to laboratory were complete, and custody was maintained as evidenced by field
and laboratory personnel signatures, dates, and times of receipt.
3. Were all the analyses requested for the samples
on the COCs completed by the laboratory?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: All requested analyses were completed, for the samples received by the laboratory.
4. Were samples received in good condition and at
the appropriate temperature?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Samples were received on ice, intact, and in good condition with cooler temperatures outside the 4'C +
2'C acceptance range at 10"C and 9"C as noted on the Sample Receipt Checklist forms. As these samples were
hand delivered from the field and did not have time to properly cool before a cooler temperature was taken,
professionaljudgment deems that no action was necessary but to note this discrepancy.
5. Were the requested analytical methods in
compliance with QAPP, permit, or COC?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Reported methods and target analyte lists were in compliance with COC records.
6. Were detection limits in accordance with QAPP,
permit, or method?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Reported detection limits are achievable by the quoted methods.
7. Do the laboratory reports include only those
constituents requested to be reported for a specific
analytical method?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Only the requested target analytes were reported.
8. Were sample holding times met?x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Analytical holding times were met for all samples and analyses.
9. Were correct concentration units reported?x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Correct concentration units were reported.
10. Were the reporting requirements for flagged
data met?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Data validation qualifiers override any assigned laboratory flags
11. Were laboratory blank samples free of target
analyte contamination?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: All laboratory blanks were free of target analyte contamination.
RETEC ANALYTICAL DATA VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (Continued)
Page 2 ol 4
D-90
06to9t2002
12. Were trip blank, field blank, and/or equipment
rinse blank samples free of target analyte
contamination?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Target analytes were not detected in trip blank or equipment rinse blank samples.
13. Were instrument calibrations within method
controllimits?
Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Calibration information was not submitted with laboratory data reports, and is, therefore, not part of this
QA review.
14. Were sunogate recoveries within control limits?x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Surrogate percent recoveries (%Rs) for organic analyses were within data validation QC criteria for all
samples.
15. Were laboratory control sample recoveries
within controllimits?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: LCS and LCSD (blank spike) recoveries were within data validation or laboratory control-charted QC
limits for all target analytes.
16. Were matrix spike recoveries within control
limits?
x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Reported project specific MS and MSD recoveries for target analytes were within data validation and
laboratory control charted QC limits.
17. Were RPDs within control limits?x Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: Laboratory RPDs were within data validation QC limits, or RPDs were not applicable due to undetected
sample results.
18. Were organic system performance criteria met?Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: System performance checks were not submitted with laboratory data reports, and are, therefore, not
part of this QA review.
19. Were internal standards within method criteria
for GC/MS sample analyses?
Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: lnternal standard information was not submitted with laboratory data reports, and is, therefore, not part
of this QA review.
Were inorganic system performance criteria20.
met?
Yes No TL lnitials
Comments: lnorganic system information was not submitted with the laboratory data reports, and is, therefore, not
part of this QA review.
21. Were blind field duplicates collected? lf so,
discuss the precision (RPD) of the results.
x Yes No TL lnitials
Duplicate Sample No. I WQ-6 Primary Sample No. I WQ-2
Comments: The RPDs for the duplicates could not be determined as there were no target analytes detected in
these samples.
22. Were 100% of the EDD concentrations and
reporting limits compared to the hardcopy data
reports?
Yes No TL lnitials
Not applicable - electronic data was not received from the laboratory for this project.
Additional Comments:
RETEC ANALYTICAL DATA VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (Continued)
Page 3 of 4
D-91
o6to9t2002
RETEC ANALYTICAL DATA VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (Continued)
General Comments: Data were evaluated based on validation criteria set forth in the USEPA Contract Laboratory
Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, document number EPA540/R-99/008 of October
1999, as they applied to EPA SW-846 methodology. Field Duplicate evaluation was based on validation criteria set
forth by EPA Region l.
Refer to the table of "Qualified Analytical Results" for a listing of the samples, analytes, and concentrations qualified.
Page 4 ot 4
o
D-92
06to9t2002
Project Name: BP Closed Hazardous Waste
Management Facility
Laboratory: Mountain States Analytical, LLC, Salt Lake
City, UT
Project Reference: September 2002 Sample Matrix: Groundwater
RETEC Project No.: AMO72 -1 57 17 -722 Sample Start Date: 09/05/02
Verified By/Date Verified: Leslie Hiil 10103102 Sampie End Date: 09/06/02
Reviewed By: Sue Milcan Review Date: 10/03/02
COC #/Samples Analyzed: COC # 25296/Samples WQ6, WQ-2, EQB, and WQ-1, COC # 25313/Samples WQ-3,
WQ-4, WQ-s, and 5-16.
Parameters Verified: Chromium by SWB46 Method 60108 and Volatiles by SW846 Method 82608.
Laboratory Project lDs: 0209039 and 0209049
PRECISION, ACCURACY, METHOD COMPLIANCE, AND COMPLETENESS ASSESSMENT
Precision:x Acceptable Unacceptable LH lnitials
Comments: Precision is the measure of variability of individual sample measurements. Field precision was
determined by comparison of field duplicate sample results. Laboratory precision was determined by examination of
laboratory duplicate results. Evaluation of both field and laboratory duplicates for precision was done using the
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) or percent difference (%D). The RPD is defined as the difference between two
duplicate samples divided by the mean and expressed as a percent. The %D for serial dilutions during metals
analysis indicates how close a diluted value corresponds with the original result. Field duplicate RPD QC limits were
set at 0-30% for water samples. Laboratory RPD limits referenced EPA published QC limits. No data require
qualification based on field and laboratory duplicate RPDs, and overall field and laboratory precision is acceptable.
Precision measurements are reviewed in items 17,20, and 21.
Accuracy:x Acceptable Unacceptable LH lnitials
Comments: Field accuracy, a measure of the sampling bias, was determined by reviewing trip blank and equipment
rinse blank results for evidence of sample contamination stemming from field activities or sample transport.
Laboratory accuracy is a measure of the system bias, and was measured by evaluating laboratory control
sample/laboratory control sample duplicate (LCS/LCSD), matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD), and organic
system monitoring compounds (surrogate) percent recoveries (%Rs). LCS/LCSD %Rs, which demonstrated the
overall performance of the analysis, were compared to EPA published QC limits. MS/MSD %Rs, which provided
information on sample matrix interferences, were compared to EPA published QC limits or laboratory controlcharted
Iimits. System monitoring compound or surrogate recoveries, which measured system performance and efficiency
during organic analysis, were compared to EPA published QC limits. No data require qualification based on field
and laboratory accuracy measurements, and overall fleld and laboratory accuracy is acceptable. Accuracy
measurements are reviewed in items 12, 14,'15, and 16.
Method Compliance:x Acceptable Unacceptable LH lnitials
Comments: Method compliance was determined by evaluating sample integrity, holding time, and laboratory blanks,
while applying EPA data validation guidelines. Although some data require qualification based on laboratory blank
contamination, overall method compliance is acceptable based on the supplied data. Method compliance
measurements are reviewed in items 4, 8, 11, 13, 18, 19, and 20.
Completeness:x Acceptable Unacceptable LH lnitials
Comments: Completeness is the overall ratio of the number of samples planned versus the number of samples with
valid analyses. Completeness goals are set at 90-100%. Determination of completeness included a review of chain
of custody records, laboratory analytical methods and detection limits, laboratory case narratives, and project
requirements. Completeness also included 100% review of the laboratory sample data results, QC summary
reports, and electronic data deliverables (EDDs). All of the data received from the laboratory are useable with
qualification. Of a total of 89 data points, none were rejected. Completeness of the data is calculated to be 100%
and is acceptable.
RETEC ANALYTICAL DATA VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
Page 1 of 4
D-93
10103t02
VALIDATION CRITERIA CHECK
Data validation flags used in this review:
U - evaluated to be undetected at the reported concentration; result is considered to be a false positive
The following comments requiring qualification are in bold type. The other comments are of interest, but qualification
of the samples was not necessary.
Refer to the table of "Qualified Analytical Results" for a listing of the samples, analytes, and concentrations qualified
in this data set.
1. Was the laboratory narrative free of non-
conformances related to the analytical results?
Yes No LH lnitials
Explanation: There were no case nanatives associated with this data.
2. Were sample Chain-of-Custody forms complete?x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: COC records from field to laboratory were complete, and custody was maintained as evidenced by field
and laboratory personnel signatures, dates, and times of receipt.
3. Were all the analyses requested for the samples
on the COCs completed by the laboratory?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: All requested analyses were completed.
4. Were samples received in good condition and at
the appropriate temperature?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Samples were received on ice, intact, and in good condition with cooler temperatures within the 4'C +
2'C acceptance range al2.0C and 2.0"C as noted on Sample Receiving Checklist forms.
5. Were the requested analytical methods in
compliance with QAPP, permit, or COC?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Reported methods and target analyte lists were in compliance with COC records
6. Were detection limits in accordance with QAPP,
permit, or method?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Reported detection limits are achievable by the quoted methods.
7. Do the laboratory reports include only those
constituents requested to be reported for a specific
analytical method?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Only the requested target analytes were reported.
8. Were sample holding times met?x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Preparation and analytical holding times were met for all samples and analyses.
9. Were correct concentration units reported?x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Correct concentration units were reported.
'10. Were the reporting requirements for flagged
data met?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Data validation qualifiers override any assigned laboratory flags.
RETEC ANALYTIGAL DATA VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (Gontinued)
Page 2 of 4
D-94
10t03t02
RETEC ANALYTICAL DATA VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (Continued)
11. Were laboratory blank samples free of target
analyte contamination?
Yes x No LH lnitials
Comments: All laboratory blanks were free of target analyte contamination, with the following exception.
0209039: 82608: The method blank analyzed on OgllTlOZ had chloroform at 0.60 pg/L and tota! rylenes at
3.0 pg/L. Ghloroform was qualified as U in associated sample EQB to indicate that the detection was
considered to be a false positive and should be evaluated to be undetected at the reported concentration.
As total xylenes was not detected in any of the associated samples no qualification of data was required.
02009049: 82608: The method blank analyzed 09117102 had chloroform at 0.60 pgil and total xylenes at 3.0 pg/1.
As these analytes were not detected in any of the associated samples no qualification of data was required.
Refer to the table of "Qualified Analytical Results" for a listing of the samples, analytes, and concentrations qualified
in this data set.
12. Were trip blank, field blank, and/or equipment
rinse blank samples free of target analyte
contamination?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Target analytes were not detected in the trip blank and equipment rinse blank samples, or sample
concentrations were greater than five times the associated blank concentration.
13. Were instrument calibrations within method
control limits?
Yes No LH Initials
Comments: Calibration information was not submitted with laboratory data reports, and is, therefore, not part of this
data verification.
14. Were sunogate recoveries within control limits?x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Surrogate percent recoveries (%Rs) for organic analyses were within data validation QC criteria for all
samples.
15. Were laboratory control sample recoveries
within controllimits?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: LCS and LCSD (blank spike) recoveries were within data validation or laboratory control-charted QC
limits for all target analytes.
16. Were matrix spike recoveries within control
limits?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Project specific MS and MSD recoveries for target analytes were within data validation QC limits or
were not applicable due to required sample dilution, or to sample concentrations which exceeded four times the
amount spiked, except as noted below. MS and MSD spike recoveries for non-project samples were not considered
since matrix similarity to project samples could not be guaranteed.
17. Were RPDs within control limits?x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: Laboratory RPDs were within data validation QC limits, or RPDs were not applicable due to undetected
sample results.
18. Were organic system performance criteria met?Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: System performance checks were not submitted with laboratory data reports, and are, therefore, not
part of this data verification.
19. Were internal standards within method criteria
for GC/MS sample analyses?
Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: lnternal standard information was not submitted with laboratory data reports, and is, therefore, not a
part of this data verification.
Page 3 of 4
D-95
10t03t02
RETEC ANALYTICAL DATA VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (Continued)
20.
met?
Were inorganic system performance criteria x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: System performance checks were within method criteria for all analyses. Duplicate results were within
QC limits or were not applicable due to results that were + the detection limit or were undetected in both samples.
ICP Metals serial dilution %Ds were within data validation limits or were not calculated due to results that were less
than a factor of 50 times the IDL in the original sample.
21. Were blind field duplicates collected? lf so,
discuss the precision (RPD) of the results.
x Yes No LH lnitials
Duplicate Sample No. I Wa-6 Primary Sample No. I Wa-2
Comments: The RPDs for the duplicates were not applicable due to results that were undetected in both samples.
22. Were 100o/o of the EDD concentrations and
reporting limits compared to the hardcopy data
reports?
x Yes No LH lnitials
Comments: There were no discrepancies between the EDD concentrations and reporting limits and the hardcopy
data reports.
Additional Comments:
General Comments: Data were evaluated based on validation criteria set forth in the USEPA Contract Laboratory
Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic/lnorganic Data Review, document numbers EPA540/R-99/008
and EPA540iR-94/013 of October 1999 (Organic) and February 1994 (lnorganic), as they applied to EPA SW-846
methodology. Field Duplicate evaluation was based on validation criteria set forth by EPA Region l.
Refer to the table of "Qualified Analytical Results" for a listing of the samples, analytes, and concentrations qualified.
Page 4 of 4
D-96
10103102
Table of Qualified Analytical Results
BP Closed Hazardous Waste Management Facility
Mountain States Analytica!, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT
Laboratory Reports 0209039 and 0209049
U - Evaluated to be undetected at the reported concentration; result is considered to be a false positive.
MB - Method blank contamination.
Page 1 of 1
D-97