DAQ-2024-005217

1

DAQC-206-24
Site ID 10346 (B4)

MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER – Refinery Boiler #2

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: March 1, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Refinery Boiler #2 (REF003)
Contact: Sean Daly: 801-204-2563
Location: Kennecott Smelter Facility, Magna, Salt Lake County, UT
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group.
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500030
Permit/AO#: Title V Operating Permit 3500030004, last revised September
27, 2022
Action Code: TR
Subject: Review of Stack Test Reports dated February 7, 2024

On February 12, 2024, DAQ received a test report for the Kennecott Utah Copper Refinery Boiler #2.
Testing was performed on December 15, 2024, to demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found
in Permit Conditions II.B.35.d and II.B.35.e. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit
Boiler #2 12/15/2023 RM 7/NOx 0.7 lb/hr 0.7 lb/hr 1.5 lb/hr
8 ppm* 8 ppm* 9 ppm*

RM 10/CO 0.02 lb/hr 0.02 lb/hr 3.00 lb/hr

*@ 3% O2

DEVIATIONS: None reported.

CONCLUSION: The stack emissions test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Kennecott Utah Copper appears to be in compliance with the applicable
conditions of the Title V operating permit at the time of this test.

HPV: No violations occurred.

ATTACHMENT: Stack test report dated February 7, 2024, DAQ spreadsheets

6 , 3
7'-.
o
-.1fi.5tr+o
Rio Tinto Kennecott
47oo Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, Utah 84oo9
T 8or-S6g-Zg8g
F 8or-569-6688
Jerome Dozol
General Manager
Metals
February o7,2o24
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
PO Box t4492o
Salt Lake City, Utah B4rr4-49zo
Attn: Mr. Paul Morris
ffi
FEB 12 ?qz!
i'i.^,r'rri li' l' Y< (etl
--;#'o$r * nm guAln1v
Subject: Stack Test Report - Kennecott Utah Copper Smelter
Refinery Tankhouse Boiler (REFoog)
Title V Operating Permit No. gsooo3ooo4
Dear Mr. Bird,
As required by Title V operating permit 35ooo3ooo4 and Approval Order DAQE-
ANro346oo58-zo, Kennecott Utah Copper performed stack testing of the
Refinery Boiler (REFoog) on December 15, 2024. The testing was conducted
following procedures outlined in 4o CFR 6o, Appendix A. The summary report
with test results is attached for submittal within 6o days of completion of the
testing. Results of the testing demonstrate that the units are in compliance with
the permit emission limits.
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements
and information contained in this document are true, accurate, and complete
(Rgoz-+ts-sd).
Should you have any questions or need further information regarding these
reports, please feel free to contact me or Sean Daly at 801-204-2562.
Sincerelv.- ;; heAJl € [o*.4<u
Jerome Dozol
General Manager, Metals
7F.o
}..1
-.5;+o
(This page intentionalla W blank)
Alllare
UTAH DEPAHTN{ENT OF
Source Test Report ENViR.NT'4ENrAL ouALrrY
Rio Tinto Kennecott
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, UT 84095 tllVISlON OF AIR QUALITY
Source Tested: Refinery Boiler #2 REF003
Test Date: December 15, 2023
Proj ect No. AST-2023 -3338-003
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
pJ/lArEe
TECI]NICAL GROUP Source Tesl Report
Test Program Summary
Resulatorv Information
Permit Nos.
Source Information
DAQE-ANo1034600s8-20
Source Name
Boiler #2
Contact Information
Source Nqme
REFOO3
Source Nome
NOx, CO
Test Location
Rio Tinto Kennecott
2500 South 9180 West
Magna, UT 84044
Jenny Esker
j enny. [e-mail]
(801) s69-6494
Sean Daly
sean.daly3 @iotinto.com
(801)204-2s63
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Tobias Hubbard
[e-mail]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
katie. shonk@alliancetg. com
(8t2) 4s2-4',t8s
Report Coordinator
Ryan Adam
[e-mail]
(469) 918-0s4s
AST-2023-3338-003 RTK - Magna, UT Page i
Cl.l NlCirt (-;llCr,f)Source Test Report
Cer!i/ication Statenent
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
{..,.,, / -2/712024
ilr' I ,: lt
Charles Horton, Operations Manager
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
AST-2023-3338-003 RTK - Magna, UT Page ii
N t P
Source Test Report
Tabb ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ll Source and Control System Descriptions. ............ l-l
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification.................. .................... l-l
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate..... 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide........ ......... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content........ ....................... 3-l
3-4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides...... ........................ 3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide.... ........................3-2
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. .....................3-2
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3,A. and 7E................. ............3-2
LIST OF TABLES
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
AST-2023-3338-003 RTK - Magna, UT Page iii
(i ii () LJ t)
Source Test Report
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Rio Tinto Kennecott (RTK) to conduct compliance
testing at the Refinery located in Magna, Utah. The facility operates under the Utah Department of Environmental
Quality, Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Approval Order (AO) DAQE-AN103460057-20. Testing was conducted
to determine the emission rates of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) from the exhaust of the
Refinery Boiler #2.
1.1 Source and Control System Descriptions
The RTK Refinery, located near the Smelter, receives anode copper produced at the Smelter and uses an electrolytic
process to obtain the high purity cathode copper. The copper anodes from the smelter are submerged in tanks
containing an electrolyte solution in batch operations. An electric current is applied to the tank for a l0-day period
during which copper ions migrate from the anode to form a cathode of 99.99% pure copper. Precious metals (gold
and silver) are recovered from the electrolytic refining slimes rernoved from the tanks in a series of
hydrometallurgical operations. The Refinery copper refining process requires steam to maintain electrolyte
temperatures and prevent the degradation of the electrolyte tanks as well as support the precious metals process. To
supply steam, the Refinery operates a CHP unit as a primary source of steam and maintains two Refinery Boilers
(Boilers #l and #2) as back up steam. Boiler #2 has recently been retrofit with an ultra-low NOx burner and is the
subject of this test program. Boiler #l will be decommissioned once stack testing is complete on Boiler #2.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-l: Project Team
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) subrnitted to UDAQ by RTK.
RTK Personnel Sean Daly
AST Personnel
Tobias Hubbard
Cael Krahn
Ryan Lyons
AST-2023-3338-003 RTK - Magna, UT Page l-l
pur6rrce
I'FC}.-INICAI- GROUP Source Test Report
Summary olResults
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the RTK Refinery in Magna, Utah on December 15, 2023. Testing
consisted of determining the emission rates of NOx and CO from the exhaust of the Refinery Boiler #2
Table 2-l provides a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ permit
limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following table and the detailed results contained in
appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-l: Summary of Results
arbon Monoxide Data
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit,lb/hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
Concentration, ppmvd @ 3% Oz
Emission Limit, ppmvd @3%Oz
Percent of Limit, 7o
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit, lb/hr
Percent of Limit, 7o
8.1
0.76
7.9
0.72
7.8
0.71
7.9
9.0
88
0.73
1.5
49
AST-2023-3338-003 RTK - Magna, UT Page 2-l
4.r.Aliatpe
Source Test Report
T'e st irrp \le thodolos,
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-l : Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and nuntber of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the rninimum nunrber of traverse points, the upstreaur and downstream
distances were equated into equivalent dianreters and conrpared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and tenrperature. The velociry and static pressure measurement
system consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manometer. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
thermocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volumetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A' - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (Ou) and carbon dioxide (CO:) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3,A. Data was collected online and repotted in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon santple line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture frorn the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sanrple line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sanrple line was used. The quality control nleasures are described in Section 3.7.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was deternrined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
conditioning train consisted of a series of chilled inrpingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravirnetrically before and after each test run on the
sarrte balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volumetric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocity Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A lnstrumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instrumental Analysis
Carbon Monoxide l0 Instrumental Analysis
Gas Dilution System Certification 205
AST-2023-3338-003 RTK - Magua, UT Page 3-l
Alialpe
(l f { (} ill:Sotn'ce Test Report
Testittg L[efhodology
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7F,. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used,
then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.7.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a
portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample
line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.7.
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on
each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed withtn 2oh of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within 10% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 2%o. These steps
were repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol 1 (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Eror Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
tinte required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-Level
gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppm or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever was less
restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The
AST-2023-333 8-003 RTK - Magna, UT Page 3-2
Almlpe
lr-aiit.ttoAl GfiOr.! ['Source Test Reporl
Testing Methodologt
measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was
within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
Systern Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3% of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3oh or 0.5 ppmv, the Calibration Error Test and Systen Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three traverse points. Each traverse point was sampled for a minimum of
twice the system response time. The pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5%o or
0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration. Copies of stratification check data
can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
An NOz - NO converter check was performed on the analyzer at the completion of testing. An approximately 50
ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response was
recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +/- l0 percent of the cylinder
concentration.
A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the AST server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team Leader
before leaving the facility. Once ariving at AST's office, all written and electronic data was relinquished to the
repoft coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
RTK - Magna, UTAST-2023-3338-003 Page 3-3
plllfirrrcE!
:LC lll',1 !(.ln L (:l Fl () l.J [r
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2023-3338
Run No. /MethodRun I / Method 34
COr - Outlet Concentration (Cgs,), o/o dry
cco,: (cou.-co)* ( #h)
where,
Cob,
co
Crrre
CM
Cco,
10.9
Oz - Outlet Concentration (Co), o/o dry
9.4 : average analyzer value during test,o/odry: average ofpretest & posttest zero responses,o/o dry: actual concentration of calibration gas, %o dry: average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, o/o dry
= COz Concentration, oZ dry
0.1
I l.l
9.2
where,
co,: (cou.-co)* ( #h-)
Corr.{ : average analyzer value during test, o/o dry
Co 0.1 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses,o/o dry
CMA ll.0 : actual concentration ofcalibration gas,o/odry
CM 11.0 : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, 7o dry
Co, 4.9 = Oz Concentration,o/o dry
pul6rrpE)
-:- [ i] 1l i\.,i I O,r'. L, () n () (l [.
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2023-3338
Run No. /MethodRun 1 / Method l0
CO - Outlet Concentration (Cco), ppmvd
cco: (co6.-c6)x /.9"^ .\\ rcM q)/
where,
Cob, -0. I : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co -0.3 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 25.2 : actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 25.6 : average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
Cco 0.2 : CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (ER6,6), lb/hr
where,
Fh C6exMWxQsx 60T x25.32 hanao -
s"
Cco 0.2 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 28.01 = CO molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 14,505 : stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfin
ERco 0.01 : lb/hr
pd/l6rrEE)
I [:!] l".l N I ()A l- (.) F] () t.l t)
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2023-3338
Run No. /lVlethod Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cns), ppmvd
where,
CNo,: (Co6.-c6)x (dk")
Cou, ___ 73 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.2 : average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 25.0 : actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 24.6 : average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo* 7.3 : NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (Cp6*6), ppmvd @ 3oh Oz
CNo*":: CNo*X ffi
where,
C*o*[_: NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Co, 4.9 : oxygen concentration, 7o
C116*6 8. I : ppmvd @3ohOz
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERNS*),lb/hr
En*":
where,
CNo" 7.3 : NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 : NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 14,505 : stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfin
ERNo* 0.76 : lb/hr
AfiErrEErTr al il Nl l CA r_ c] R (") r, r)
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Example Calculations
Source Boiler #2
Proiect No. 202$.3338
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
AHpm = pb+ffi
where,
Pb 25.50 = baometric pressure, in. Hg
AH_-|1|\= pressure difi'erential of orifice, in HlO
Pm 25.60 :in. Hg
Absolut€ Stack G.s Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
Psps = pb+#
wherq
Pb 25.50 : buometric pressure, in. Hg
Pg __ -ojl _ = ttatic pressure, in. I{2O
Ps 25.47 = in. Hg
Standrrd Met€r Volume (Vmstd), dscf
l7.636xVmxPmxY
where,
Y ___92!2_ = .eter correction factor
V^L= metervolume,cf
P*___ 25j9*= absolute meter pressure, in. Hg
T.fryl-= absolute n€tertempemture, oR
Vmstd 37.657 = dscf
Statrdrrd Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
where,
Vstd: 0.04716 x Vlc
Vl"____.14il _= weight of H2O collected, g
Vmtd 6.758 = scf
Moisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionlss (theoretical at saturated conditions)
' ^^ t 2'827 \
10o.r / -\Ts+365-,
B\ /Ssat =
-
wherc, Ps
Ts 29?.4 : stack temperature, oF
Ps-f!l= absolute stack gas prssure, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 = dimensionless
I\loisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
VwstdDIA'C _
-
- (Vwstd * Vmstd)
where,
VNtd 6.758 = standard wet volume, scf
Vmstd 37.657 = standard meter volume, dscf
BWS__ 0.152 _-dimensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
where,
BWSsat 1.000 = moisture fraction (theoretical at saturated conditions)
BWSnrsd 0J 52 = moisture fraction (me6ured)BwsA
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lbnLmole
Md = (0.44 x o/oco2) + (0.32 x o/oo2) + (0.28 (t00- o/sco2 - o/oo2))
where,
COrL- cabon dioxide concentration, 9/o
O. __jl:L = oxygen concentration, Yo
Md 29.67 = lb/lb mol
Tm
AI6rrce
If(.1,NIO.rt OR.)Uir,
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordatr, UT
Source Boiler #2
Project No. 202!3338
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lbilb-mole
Ms = Md (1 - BWS) + 18.01s (BWs)
where,
Md 29.67 - molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
BWS 0.152 = moisture fraction, dimensionles
Ms 27.90 = lb4b mol
Average Velocity (Vs), ftlsec
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x (Apl/z)avg x
wherq
Cp 0.84 = pitot tube coefficient
A P''---7-= average pre/post test velocity head of stack ga, (in. H2o)r2
rt ]][- "rerage
pre/post test absolute stack temperature, "R
P" __2!_= ubsolute stack 96 pr6sure, in. Hg
MtA: moleculu weight of stack gas, lb/lb mol
Vs 52y' = 0/sec
Average Stack Gas Flow st Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa = 60x Vs x As
where,
V, ___j2.1_ = stack go velocity, fl/sec
A" 917 = cross-sectional arq ofstack, ft2
Qa 28,832 = acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Qsd = 17.636 x Qa x (l - BWS) x
where,
Qa 28,812 = average stack 96 flow at stack conditions, acfm
BWS-..]LLL= moisture fraction, dimensionles
P" ___2!_= ubsolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Ts 75'7.l = average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, 'RQ"E=at"r*
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), percent
uhere,
Y 0.982 = mete. corection factor, dimensiotless
o----?6-= -n time, min.
V-___l2J::_= total meter volme, dcf
T-_jry!-= absolute meter temperature, oR
LIl@ 1.763 = o.ifice met€r calibration coefticient, in. H1O
Pb___ 2119_= baometric prssure, in. Hg
AH avS_!!\= average pressure ditlerential of ori6ce, in H2O
Md 29.61 = molecula weight (DRY), lb,4b mol
(A r0''
-L
1s3- = average square root prssure diff€rential of ori6ce, (in. H2o)rr2
Yqa 03 = percent
Example Calculations
Ps
Ts
x 100
Emissions Calculations
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source Boiler #2
Project No. AST-2023-3338
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date
Start Time
Stoo Time
12n5t23 t2^st23 12il5t23
8:50 10:02 I l: 13
9:50 ll:02 12:13
Input Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Flo'rv Rate (Ml-4), dscfm
BWS
Qs
0.152
14,505
0.151
14,407
0.155 0.153
14,256 14,389
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration, % dry co, 4.87 4.96 5.03 4.95
COu Concentration. %o dry C".,, 9.23 9.17 9.14 9'18
CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr
Cco
ERco
0.24
0.0r
0.25
0.02
0.24
0.02
0.24
0.02
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Concentlation, ppmvd @ 3 % O,
NOx Emission Rate. lb/hr
CNo*
CNo*":
ER*^-
7.27
8.1 I
0.76
7.00
7.87
0.72
6.92
7.81
0.7r
7.06
7.93
0.73
tr:AlralrcE)
-:r 1.,: li i..l i.-,,'1 i :'l l-i i-: i.l fr
Method I Data
Source Boiler #2
Projcct No. 2023-3338
Drrc 12115/23
DoctOrientttion: Vcdical
Dr.t D..ign, ---tiiii-
Dis(ance from t'ar wall to outrid" of Pon,----ii]i-i,' 1----t- I
a:'rat til&a" 6 ,snrcrrrkf,4 5}*s o. M15
,,]illlttll
l.,j
,l
")l
I
I
€1..xiltpt" t rgttt, ----!36-
Deprh ofDuct: 41.00
Crojs Sectional Area ofDuct: 9,
No. ofTest Pods: 2
Nuillbcr ofReadings per Poitrt; I
Distancc A: 63
Dirtancr A Duct Diamet€rs: l3
Di$tilce B: 20.0
Dijtancc B Duat Dimea€rsi 5.9
Mitrimunr Numbcr of Tr*".r" Poin*r -----'ii-
A(tual Numbcr of T ra\ "rr" Pointr, ----Ji--
Mcesurcr (lnitirl end Date): _!j!pf)j!]_
Rcyic$cr (lnitirl turd Date): _f![pf]j!]-
tn
hr
rC
ft
(must be > 0,5)
ft
(must bc > 2)
f,t sru
,]
il
l(x:li4{Er
i- . ti;i:-iii
1 ,""
1
i ","."" "-".,.t..._,..,
Trrvcr$e
Point
Y. of Dirtrtrc€from
Diameler $all otrbide of
I
J
{
6
7
8
9
l0
lt
l2
3.2
10.5
19.4
32.3
67.7
806
89.5
968
1.31
4.3t
'1.95
t3.24
27.76
13.05
36 7t)
39.69
6 t3A6
9 13t6
t3 7/16
t8 3/4
33 |4
38 9/16
42 3/t6
45 316
LOCATION OF TRA!'ERSI POINTS
Nunber oJraverv poittts on a diaude?
I
2
3
1
5
6
7
8
9
l0
I
3 I 5 6 1 8 9 l0 II t2
14.6
85.4
6.7
25.0
75.0
4.4
14.6
29.6
10.4
85.4,:,
3.2
10.5
t9.4
323
67.7
8fJ.6
89.5
96.8
2.6
t4.6
D,6
34.2
65.8
774
85.4
9 t.8
91 4
2.t
6.7
il.8
t'7.7
250
35.6
64.4
7j.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
979
*Pcrccnt ofstrck diantetetfotn inside \all to treerse point
Stack Diagram
A = 6.3 ft.
B=20n
Depth olDuct = 41 in.
('ross Setional Area
Downstream
Dlsturbance
aaaaaaaa
upstream
Disturbance
plllffiircEr Cyclonic FIow Check
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan
Source Boiler #2
Project No. 2023-3338
Dfie l2ll5l23
Sample Point Angle (AP:0)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
ll
l2
l3
t4
l5
l6
Averase 3.8
AlhlrcEr Method 2Data
l-ocation Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source Boiler #2
Proiect No. 2023-3338
Run No
Dat(
Statu!
Start Timr
Stop Timt
Leak Checl
I
t2ltst23
VALID
8:50
9:50
Pass
2
t2il5t23
VALID
10.02
I l:02
Pass
3
t2/15/23
VALID
I l:13
l2:13
Pass
A
Traverce Point AP
(in. wC)
Ts
cF)
AP
(in. wC)
Ts
cF)
AP
(in. wC)
Ts
cF)
AI
2
J
4
5
6
7
8
BI
)
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.36
0.39
0.46
0.58
0.65
0.67
0.59
0.58
0.30
0.36
0.48
0.56
0.60
0.58
0.51
0.43
282
28s
289
290
291
293
294
296
294
299
302
305
308
310
3l I
310
0.33
0.41
0.51
0.55
0. s8
0.54
0.50
0.43
0.31
0.46
0.54
0.62
0.62
0.63
0.s8
047
2
3
3
J
3
3l
3(
3(
3
3
3
3
3
)8
)6
l0
II
t4
t2
t0
tl
)2
)5
)6
I
4
3
2
0.35
0.40
0.55
0.5s
0.55
0.52
0.47
0.40
0.30
0.42
0.57
0.6s
0.64
0.64
0.57
0.47
3(
J
J
J
3
3
J
J
J
3
3'.
J
fl
3l
3l
J]
I
2
6
7
8
7
7
5
9
t0
8
5
7
6
6
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)1/2
Average AP, in. WC
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Static Pressure, in. WC
Stack Pressurt, in. Hg
Average Temperatune, oP
Average Temperature, oR
Measured Moisturrc Fraction
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation
Moisture Fraction
02 Concentration, 7o
CO2 Concentration, 7o
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (dry)
Molecular Weight, lb/lb-mole (wet)
Velocity, ftlsec
VFR at stack conditions, acfm
VFR at strndard conditions, sclh
VFR at standard conditions, scfm
VFR at standard conditions. dscfm
(AP)"'
(^P)
(cp)
(Pb)
(Ps)
(Ps)
(Ts)
(rs)
(BWSmsd)
(BWSsat)
(Bws)
(o2)
(co2)
(Md)
(Ms)
(vs)
(Qa)
(Qsw)
(Qsw)
(Osdl
0.707
0.51
0.840
2s.s0
-0.35
2s.47
297.4
757.1
0.152
L000
0.r52
4.9
9.2
29.67
27.90
s2.4
28,832
1,026,509
1 7,1 08
14 505
0.707
0.51
0.840
25.50
-0.45
25.47
309. I
768.8
0.151
1.000
0. l5l
5.0
9.2
29.67
27.90
52.8
29,0s9
I ,01 8,60 r
t6,977
14.407
0.705
0.s0
0.840
25.50
-0.40
25.47
315.3
77 5.0
0.155
L000
0.155
5.0
9.t
29.66
27.85
52.9
29,124
I,012,82s
I 6,880
14.2s6
0.707
050
0.840
25.50
-0.40
25.47
307.3
767.0
0.153
1.000
0.153
50
9.2
29.67
27.88
s2.7
29,00s
1,019,3r r
16,989
14.389
Method 4 Data
Locetion
Source
Proj€ct No.
Parameter(s) VFR
Consoh ljnits / ['lethod
Run No.
D{te
Status
Sta[ Tim€
End Tinre
Run Time, min (0)
Nl€ter ID
I
12t15t23
VALID
ti:50
9:50
60
M5-14
2
t).il5t23
VALID
l0:02
I l:02
60
Mi-td
3
t2/15t23
VALID
I lil3
l2:13
60
M5-[
l\I€aer Correction Frctor (Y)
Orifice Calibretion Velue (AH @)
lllil Vecuum, in. Hg
Post Lerk Ch€ck. ft3/min {rt mar vrc.l
0.982
1.763
4
.00t rd 4'
0.982
L763
4
000,4 4'
0 9E2
t.163
4
ont (; t"
U€ter Volume, ft3
0
5
t0
t5
20
30
35
40
45
v)
60
Iotel Mer€r Volume. ft.3
669.098
672.620
676.165
679.695
683.200
686.875
690.415
693.925
697.535
701.100
701.625
708.1 85
7l 1.853
42.755
712.569
716.325
720.0,i0
723.7 t5
721.400
73t.ll0
73.r.78-i
738.495
712.295
7.16.065
7.19.81i
7_i3.555
7 57 .223
4.r.654
151.536
761.325
764.985
768.630
'772.420
776.200
779.955
783.810
787 .61 5
79t.425
79-5.025
798 56i
801.099
lemperrture, oF
0
5
l0
l5
20
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
\verrge T€mperature, "F (Tm)
\!€rxge Tempereture, oR (Tn)
finimum Tempeuturg oF
ilatimnm Temnerrhre- oF
lUet€r
39
3q
39
40
40
42
41
4i
47
4E
53
55
44
503
38
55
Probe Filter Vacuum
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
I
4
4
4
4
4
Imp. Erit
36
35
34
35
35
35
36
36
37
36
37
38
38
36
31
38
l\Ieter
59
60
62
63
63
64
65
65
65
66
66
61
61
64
524
59
67
Probe Filter Vacuum
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Imp. Erit
62
63
,i8
i2
it
5t
5t
52
53
5i
56
ii
5t
63
Nleter
67
68
69
70
72
72
72
73
73
74
74
71
7i
72
i3t
67
75
Probe Filter Vacuum
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
I
1
I
.t
lmp. Exit
47
48
47
48
48
49
50
-i0
-;2
_il
-i2
-i.{
-i0
11
-i.+
iaromenic Pressure, in. Hg
l{eter Orifice Pressure , in. \vC
lleter Pressure, in. Hg
(Pb)
(^H)
(Pm)
25.50
1.400
25.60
11 651
2_5.50
1.400
2i.60
t7 8t0
2i.50
1.400
25.60
36 347
dnalysis Type
Impinger 1, Pr€/Post Test, g
ImpinBer 2, Pre/Post Test, g
Impinger.l, Pre/Post Test, g
Impinger 4, Prc/Post Test, g
l'olume Water Collected, mL (\'lc)
Standard Water Volume, ft3 (VNstd)
Nloisture Frsction Mersured (BWS)
Gas luoleculer Weight, lbnb-mole (dry) (lltd)
DG[{ arlibretion Check Vrlu€ lYox}
G
H20
H20
Empt-v
711.4
740.8
635.8
843.9
't12.6
636.4
132.5
1.8
0.6
t4
H20
H20
Empt)
721.2
742.6
636.4
857.2
743.9
637.0
133.0
1.3
0.6
H20
H20
Empty
727.2
'743.9
637.0
860.9
74i.1
637.1
133.7
1.2
0.1
143.3
6.758
0.152
29.67
0.3
l.{3.0
6.144
0.15 t
29.67
2.6
I4I.9
6.692
0.15_i
27.8,i
-3.8
AIfrLTEE)Method I Data
Location R;o Tinto K€nnecott - South Jordan, UT
Source Boiler #2
Project No. AST-2023-3338
Date: l2l15/23
DuctOrientrtion: Vcni€l
D,.r D".ign,--tliili-
Distrnce trom Far \ all to Out.id" of Porr,---f,ii-d-in
Nippl. L.ngtr', ---116-in
Depth ofDuct: 41.00 in
Cross Sectional Aree of Ou.r,---i-ii-1,
No. of T".t Pon.,
-l-Number ofRerdings per Point: I
u,.t-." A,---li-f,
Distance A Duc. Dirnr.,"r.,-=l_I-1.ust lre > 0.5.)
Di.tanc. B,---ldi-ft
Distance B Duct Dirmeters: 59 (must be2 2)
luininrufl Number ofTreverse Points: l6
Actu.t Numb€r of Tran"r." Poirt,, ----l-
l\t€asurer (lnitisl and Dr,.), lf,llllllJ
Reviewer (Initial and Drt";' ifilllZf
Travercr
Point
'/" ol Distsnce Distence
fronr
ontside o(Dianet€r
wall
I
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
ll
t2
16.7
i0.0*l'
6.85
20.50
3.t.li
12.35
26.00
39.65
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nunher oftra'erse pifrts oD o dittretq
I
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
l0
lt
t2
2 -1 5 6 1 8 9 l0 ll t2
14.6 16.7
8-i.4 50.0
_ *l'
61
25.0
7i.0
,,_,
4.4
146
296
70.4
8i.4
'lu
32
10.5
19.4
32.i
61.7
80.6
89.-i
n:'
2.6
t4.6
22.6
34.2
65.8
77.4
85.4
91.8
2.t
61
I 1.8
17.7
25.0
3 5.6
644
7i.0
82.3
93.3
97.9
*I'erceilt ofstdck didnetet Jroil inside Eall ,o trflerse poit-
ax6ler uurrer,s tor
Roclangubr sracrs o. Oucrs
Stack Diagram
A=6.3ft.
B=20ft.
DcpthofDuct=41 in.
(lross Sectional Arc,
Downstream
Disturbance
Upstream
Disturbance
AIffirce
It': [)l-i l,] ICn L. (;Frlf)i.JP
Runl-RMData
Iaetion: Rio Tinto Kquecott - South Jordm UT
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: l!8423-3338
Date; I2ll5l23
Time
Unit
Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outleto/odry Yodry ppmvd
Valid Vatid Valid
Uncorrsted Run Average (Co5)
Cal Gas Concentration (CM{)
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttst System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pr€test System Cal Rsponse
Postt6t System Cal Response
Average Cal Reponse (Cq)
Corrected Run
9.43
10.90
0.07
0.1o
0.09
I t.08
I t.l5
tt.t2
9
9.37
9.38
9.39
9.41
9.38
9.31
9.35
9.3'1
9.39
9.40
9.38
9.38
9.36
9.38
9.4t
9.38
9.35
9.42
9.39
9.41
9.40
9.42
9.40
9.47
9.44
9.48
9.46
9.44
9.43
9.43
9.46
9.47
9.44
944
9.44
9.44
9.45
9.46
9.44
9.43
9.43
9.46
9.47
9.45
9.44
9.43
9.47
9.48
9.41
9.49
9.45
9.44
9.46
9.47
9.41
9.46
9.45
9.46
9.45
9.46
-0.09
25.t9
-0.26
-0.41
-0.34
25.'74
25.49
25.62
24
NOx - Outlet
ppmvd
Valid
7.32
24.95
0. l0
0.35
0.23
24.38
24.80
24.59
'1.27
'7 09
7.|
'7.20
1.27
'1.29
7.31
1.27
7.33
1.36
7.36
1.37
7.40
7.24
7.34
7.48
7.30
7 .t6
7.32
7.26
7.33
7.32
7.31
1.26
7.37
'7.30
1.36
7.33
1.33
1.33
7.29
'1.36
7.38
7.34
7.34
'1.34
7.3',1
7.38
'7.36
7.32
7.30
7.35
7.38
7.33
7.34
7.28
't.33
7.38
1.35
'1.39
7.31
1.2A
7.33
7.34
7.36
7.33
7.33
7.35
't.32
7.35
8:50
8:51
8:52
8:53
8;54
8:55
8:56
8:57
8:58
8:59
9:00
9:01
9:O2
9:03
9:04
9:05
9:06
9:0'1
9:08
9:09
9:10
9;l I
9:12
9r l3
9:14
9: I5
9:16
9.t1
9:18
9:19
9:20
9:21
9.22
9:23
9:24
9:25
9:26
9:27
9.28
9:29
9:30
9:31
9:32
9:33
9.34
9:35
9:36
9:37
9:38
9:39
9:40
9:41
9:42
9:43
9:44
9:45
9.46
9:4'1
9:48
9:49
4.99
4.97
4.96
4.91
4.95
5.00
5.01
5.00
4.96
4.93
4.97
4.98
5.01
4.98
4.93
4.98
5.06
4.9t
4.96
4.95
4.96
4.93
4.98
4.88
4.89
4.85
4.81
4.91
4.93
493
4.87
4.85
4.88
4.89
4.91
4.92
4.88
4.88
4.90
4.92
4.92
4.88
4.85
4.89
4.9t
4.92
4.87
4.84
4.86
4.86
4.89
4.92
4.88
4.86
4.85
4.87
4.90
488
4.88
4.89
-0.o2
0.0
-0.05
-0.03
-0.04
-0.05
-0.06
-0.04
-0.06
-0.06
-0.05
-0.05
-0.06
-0.07
-0.06
-0 08
-0.07
-0.07
-0.08
-0.07
-0.07
-0.07
-0.09
-0.08
-0. l0
-0.09
-0.08
-0.08
-0.09
-0.09
-0.09
-0.09
-0.09
-0. l0
-0.1 1
-0. l0
-0.09
-0.n
-0. l0
-0. l0
-0. l3
-0.t2
-0.ll
-0. l3
-0.1 I
-0.12
-0.13
-0. t3
-0.t2
-0. l3
-0.13
-0.t4
-0.1 4
-0.t3
-0.1 3
-0. l4
-0.13
-0. l4
-0.t4
-0.t3
4.92
10.98
0.08
0.1 I
0. l0
10.94
I l.0l
10.98
#AlialpE)
I | (l li i.i rr'lA[ [i Fr)rJf
Run2-RMData
Lostion: Rio Tinto Kemecott - South Jorda, UT
Sourcs Borler #2
Prcject No.: AST-2023-3338
Draet 12115123
Time
Unit
Status
0r - Outle(
Y. dry
Valid
COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
%dry ppmvd ppmvd
Valid Valid Vdid
Uncorrsted Run Average (Cob)
Cal Gas Concentration (Cur)
Pret€st Syst€m Zero Response
PosttBt System Zero Reponse
Average ro Response (Co)
Pretest Systm Cal Rsponse
Postt6t System Cal Response
Average Cal Raponse (Cy)
10.02
l0:03
l0:04
l0:05
l0:06
l0:07
l0:08
l0:09
l0:10
l0:l I
10.t2
10:13
1 0:14
l0:15
1 0:16
l0:t7
l0:18
l0:19
l0:20
lO:21
lO:22
l0:23
lO:24
l0:25
lO:26
l0:2'l
l0:28
lO:29
l0:30
l0:31
lO:32
l0:33
l0:34
l0:35
l0:36
l0:37
l0:38
l0:39
l0:40
l0:41
lO:42
l0:43
l0:44
l0:45
l0:46
lO:47
l0:48
l0:49
l0:50
l0:51
l0:52
l0:53
l0:54
l0:55
l0:56
l0:57
l0:58
l0:59
I l:00
I l:01
5.06
r0.98
0.1 I
0.16
0.14
I l.0l
l 1.03
I 1.02
496
9.39
r0.90
0.10
0.10
0. l0
I 1.15
ll.13
I l.l4
911
9.44
9.45
9.47
9.45
9.38
9.38
9.36
9.39
9.39
9.41
9.40
9.31
9.36
9.38
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.35
9.38
9.40
9.39
9.37
9.35
9.36
9.38
9.37
9.36
9.36
9.36
9.37
9.37
9.35
9.40
9.37
9.31
9.41
9.40
9.39
9.38
9.37
9.31
9.4t
9.4t
9.39
9.38
9.40
9.41
9.40
9.38
9.36
9.35
9.39
9.40
9.38
9.31
9.35
9.39
9.4t
9.41
9.40
-o.20
25.t9
-0.41
-0.52
-o.47
25.49
25.16
25.33
o25
7.16
24.95
0.35
0.33
0.34
24.80
24.45
24.63
700
4.88
4.91
4.88
4.90
5.03
5.05
5.10
5.05
5.06
5.01
5.01
5.06
5.08
5.07
5.O2
5.03
5.04
5.10
5.06
5.02
5.O4
5.07
5.10
5. t0
5.06
5.O't
5.09
5.09
5.09
5.09
5.08
5.13
5.O2
5.06
5.09
5.03
5.03
5.05
5.06
5.10
5.08
5.07
5.01
5.05
5.09
5.07
5.03
5.06
5.10
5.13
5.l5
5.09
5.07
5.08
5.l l
5.t2
5. l0
5.04
5.03
5.04
-0. l3
-0. l5
-0. l5
-0. t5
-0. l5
-0.1 6
-0.16
-0.1 7
-0.t7
-0.1 6
-0.1 7
-0.17
-0.1 8
-0.1 7
-0 19
-0.19
-0.18
-0. l9
-0.19
-0. l9
-0.20
-0.1 9
-o.20
-0.20
-0. l9
-0. l9
-0. t8
-0. l9
-o.20
-0.21
-0.20
-0.21
-0.21
-o.20
-o.21
-o.21
-0.2t
-0.22
-0.21
-o.22
-o.22
-0.22
-0.23
-0.23
-0.23
-0.23
-0.24
-0.23
-0.23
-0.24
-0.24
-o.24
-0.25
-0.25
-0.25
-o.26
-0.25
-0.26
-0.25
-0.27
1.20
'1.14
'7.t6
7.\t
7.06
7.05
'1.02
7.0r
7.tI
7.17
7.15
7.14
7.t3
't.12
7.22
7.23
7.23
7.t2
7. t5
1.21
7.22
'7.16
7 .14
'1.t4
'1.23
1.20
'1.22
7.20
7.23
7.21
7.22
7.13
'1.23
7.19
'7.t6
7.25
7.21
7.20
1.t5
7.20
7.18
7.18
'1 .t7
7.t2
7.t4
7.t6
/ to
7.t7
7. t0
'7.t4
1.15
7.18
'7.15
7.08
7.03
1.O7
7.t5
7.16
'7.t2
pln6rrce
I L. C tl i.J tC A L
Run3-RMData
(; fi ,i) l.J P
Location: Rio Tinto Ksnecott - South Jordm, UT
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2023-3338
Daaet 12/15123
Time
Unit
Status
0r - Outlet
o/o dry
Valid
5.14
10.98
0.16
0.17
0.1 7
I 1.03
I 1.06
I 1.05
508
-o.32
25.19
-o.52
-o.62
-0.57
25.16
24.94
25.05
-o.21
-0.28
-0.28
-0.28
-0.28
-0.28
-o.28
-0.29
-o.29
-0.29
-0.30
-0.30
-0.30
-0.30
-0.30
-0.30
-0.31
-0.31
-0.33
-0.31
-o.32
-0.31
-0.32
-0.31
-o.32
-0.31
-0.32
-0.32
-0.33
-0.33
-0.31
-0.33
-o.32
-0.33
-o.32
-0.33
-o.34
-o.34
-0.34
-0.35
-0.35
-0.34
-0.34
-0.34
-0.34
-0.35
-0.35
-0.35
-0.34
-0.36
-0.35
-0.36
-0.36
-0.35
-0.36
-o.34
-0.37
-0.35
-0.37
-0 :16
6.91
24.95
0.33
0.33
0.33
24.45
24.08
24.27
6.98
6.94
6.95
6.93
6.94
6.93
6.9t
6.90
6.94
6.91
6.94
6.96
6.91
6.90
6.96
6.93
6.97
6.92
6.89
6.93
6.95
6.98
6.98
6.96
6.99
6.99
6.96
6.94
6.87
6.97
6.98
6.99
6.98
6.91
6.96
7.01
1.01
'7.04
6.97
6.97
7.00
7.07
7.02
1.O2
6.94
1.O2
7.03
7.O2
6.98
6.96
7.0t
6.98
7.05
7.01
7.01
?.00
6.96
7.06
1.02
104
Cor - 0utlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outleto/"dry ppmvd ppmvd
Vatid Valid Va.lid
Uncorrsted Run Average (Cob)
Cal Gas Concentration (Cs1)
Pretest System Zero Response
PosttBt System Z€ro Rsponse
Average Zero R€sponse (Co)
Pretst System C8l Rspons€
Posttst System Cal Response
Average Cal Reponse (Cy)
I l:13
I l:14
I l:15
I 1:16
ll:17
I t:18
I l:19
1l:20
ll:21
ll:22
I l:23
ll:24
ll:25
1t.26
ll:27
I l:28
il.29
I l:30
ll:31
I l:32
ll:33
ll:34
ll:35
I l:36
I l:37
I l:38
I l:39
I l:40
I l:41
ll:42
I l:43
I l:44
I l:45
I l:46
ll:41
llr48
1l:49
I l:50
I l:51
I l:52
I l:53
I 1:54
I l:55
I 1:56
I l:57
I l:58
I l:59
l2:OO
l2:Ol
l2:O2
l2:03
l2:O4
12.o5
12.06
l2:O1
I2:08
t2.o9
l2:10
12:ll
1,2 12
ll
t2
t3
l3
t1
5.20
t7
t7
t7
t8
5.20
5.21
5.t1
5. r9
5.21
5.21
5.20
5.17
5.15
5. l4
5.17
5.2t
5.15
5.18
5.21
5.2t
5.24
5.1 7
5.15
5.18
5.2t
5.19
5.17
5.13
5.12
5.12
5.15
5. r5
5.10
5.07
5.08
5.1 I
5. t4
5.10
5.08
5.08
5.1 I
5.13
5.08
5.07
5.05
5.07
5.1 I
5.1 I
5.t2
5.09
5.08
508
9.36
10.90
0.10
0.07
0.09
I t.l3
I l.14
ILt4
4
9.38
9.36
9.36
9.36
9.35
9.33
9.31
9.32
9.34
9.33
9.34
9.33
9.32
9.31
9.34
9.32
9.32
9.31
9.32
9.35
9.35
9.35
9.34
9.32
9.35
9.33
9.32
9.32
9.30
9.35
9.35
9.33
9.33
9.33
9.35
9.38
9.38
9.38
9.36
9.38
9.40
9.40
9.39
9.37
9.36
9.39
9.39
9.39
9.37
9.37
9.40
9.40
9.41
9.40
9.38
9.31
9.36
9.39
9.38
939
AIiarrcE!
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
QA Data
Source Boiler #2
Proiect No. 2023-3338
Parameter(s) VFR
Date Pitot ID Evidence of
damage?
Evidence of
mis-alignment?
Calibration or
Repair reouired?
t2n5t23 P6-96 no no no
Date Probe or
Thermocounle ID
Reference
Temo. (oF)
Indicated
Temn. (oF)Difference Criteria
t2ilst23 P6-96 I 00.0 99.0 0.2%+ 1.5 % (absolute)
Field Balance Check
Date 12trst23
Balance II):sA2881026
Certified weight ID SLC-TKG-3
Certified Weight (g):r000.0
Measured Weight (g)999.7
Weight Difference (g)0.3
Date Barometric Pressurr Evidence of
damage?Reading Verified Calibration or
Reoair reouired?Weather Station Location
t2lt5l23 Weather Station NA NA NA SALT LAKE CITY AIRPORT
Date Meter Bor II)Positive Pressure Leak Check
r2tr5t23 M5-14 Pass
€:'-Aliatrce DGM Calibration-Orifices
Document I 620.AA4
Revlsion 230
Effective Dat€1/25/2)
lssulnq Depafiment Tech 5ervices Paq€lofl
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console lD. M5-14
N,4eter S/N. 8219521
Critical Orifice S/N: 1330
Calibration Detail
lnltial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (pbr)
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (PbF)
Average Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
25.49
25.45
25 47
Critifcal Orifice lD ry)
K', Factor, ft: R'/2 / in. Wc.min (K')
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (VP)
lnitial DGM Volume, ftr (Vmr)
Final DGM Volume, ftr (Vm,
Total DGM Volume, ftr (Vm)
1330-31
0.8429
14.0
76.900
87.935
11.03 5
1330-31 1330 25
0 6728
150
105.900
114.669
8.769
1330-25 1 330-19
0.5186
17.0
139.505
149.849
10.344
1330 19
0.8429 0.673 0 51q
14.0
87 935
98978
11 043
15.0
114.669
123.421
8752
fia
149.849
156.704
6.85 5
Ambient Temperature, "F (Ta)
lnitial DGM Temperature, 'F (Im)
Final DGM Temperature, "F (TmF)
Averaqe DGNy' Temperature,'F ( Tm)
72
67
67
67
72
67
68
68
73
69
69
69
73
69
70
70
71
66
67
67
71
67
68
6B
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, ftr (Vmstd)
Standard Critical Orifice Volume, ft3 (Vcr)
N,4eter Correction Factor (Y)
T olera rce
Orifice Ca ibration Value (AH @)
Tolerance
Or.f ce Car Chec<
10.00
3.20
9 5003
9 3106
0 980
0.002
1.788
0 025
10 00
320
9.4982
9.3106
0.980
0.002
1 786
0 023
10.00
2.00
7 4951
1.4247
0 991
0.008
1.144
0.018
10 00
200
7.4735
7.4247
0.993
0 011
1.743
0.020
15.00
1.20
8 8629
8 6007
0 970
0.012
1.759
0 003
10.00
1.20
5.8623
5.7338
0.978
0.004
1.756
0.007
1.20 1.83 1.79
Meter Correction Factor ff)0.982
)rifice Calibration Value (AH @)1.763
Positive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make: OMEGA
Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A
Reference Calibrator S/N. T-197207
Calibration Detail
Reference Temp Display Temp Accuracv Difference
I oR oF oR /o oF
0
68
100
460
528
560
-1
66
98
459
526
558
0.2
0.4
0.4
1
2
2
223
248
aa)
683
708
733
221
246
271
681
706
731
UJ
0.3
0.3
2
2
2
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,'100
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1,660
298
397
496
597
tr99
799
899
1,000
1,100
1,200
758
857
956
1,051
1,159
1,259
1,359
1,460
1,560
1,660
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
2
4
)
1
1
1
0
0
0
Personnel
Stacey Cunningham
Calibratlon By
Calibration Date
Reviewed By
RYAN LYONS
6/21/2023
AdHTEE!
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
QA Data
Source Boiler #2
Project No. AST-2023-3338
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Ooeratins Ranse
servomex
4900
100269
25
seryomex
4900
100269
100
thermo
48i
208845
100
thenno
42i
132195897 t
100
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
EB0097304
EB0097304
NA
NA
8B0097304
EB0097304
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
r0.98
24.0
NA
NA
10.9
23.7
NA
NA
s0.39
50.39
NA
NA
49.91
49.91
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
9lt913t
10119129
NA
NA
9l1913t
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
t0120130
10120130
NA
NA
10120130
10120130
fvne of Samnle Line Heated Samole Line
Calibration Data
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2023-3338
Date: l2ll5l23
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO, - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exnected Averase Concentration 10.00 5.00 r0.00 10.00
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Span
10.00
50.00
24.00
5.00
25.00
23.70
10.00
50.00
50.39
10.00
50.00
49.91
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.60
14.40
9.48
t4.22
20.16
30.23
19.96
29.9s
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.98
24.00
0.00
NA
10.90
23.10
0.00
NA
2s.19
50.39
0.00
NA
24.9s
49.91
Upscale Calibration Gas (Cva)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (7. or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
1 1.03
24.02
0.04
NA
11.20
23.74
-0.02
NA
25.70
50.56
-0.06
NA
25.01
49.93
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
0.21
0.08
0.17
NA
1.27
0.17
0.04
NA
l.0l
0.34
0.12
NA
0.24
0.04
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
AliangE!Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: fuo Tinto Kemecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2023-3338
Parameter Oz - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run 1 Date l2ll5l23
Span Value
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.00
0.00
I 1.03
0.08
0.l l
10.94
1 1.01
23.'70
0.04
l 1.20
0.07
0.10
I 1.08
I l.l5
50.39
-0.02
25.'70
-0.26
-0.41
25.74
25.49
49.91
-0.06
25.0'.1
0. l0
0.35
24.38
24.80
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
0.33
0.46
-0.37
-0.08
0. l3
0.25
-0.51
-0.21
-0.48
-0.77
0.08
-0.42
0.32
0.82
- 1.38
-0.54
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0. r3
0.29
0. l3
0.30
-0.30
-0.50
0.50
0.84
Run 2 Date l2ll5l23
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstmment Upscale Cal Response
Pretest Systenl Zero Response
Posttest Systern Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Upscale Response
24.00
0.00
I 1.03
0.1 I
0. l6
11.01
I 1.03
23.70
0.04
I 1.20
0. r0
0. l0
I l.l5
ll.l3
50.39
-0.02
25.70
-0.41
-0.s2
25.49
25.16
49.9t
-0.06
25.07
0.35
0.33
24.80
24.4s
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
0.46
0.67
-0.08
0.00
0.25
0.25
-0.21
-0.30
-0.77
-0.99
-0.42
-t.07
0.82
0.78
-0.54
-1.24
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.21
0.08
0.00
-0.08
-0.22
-0.65
-0.04
-0.70
Run 3 Date l2ll5l23
Span Value
Instrurnent Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest Systern Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale Response
24.00
0.00
I 1.03
0. r6
0.r7
r 1.03
I1.06
23.70
0.04
11.20
0. l0
0.07
I l.13
I l l4
50.39
-0.02
25.70
-0.52
-0.62
25.t6
24.94
49.91
-0.06
25.07
0.33
0.33
24,45
24.08
Bias (7o)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.67
0.7 |
0.00
0. l3
0.25
0. l3
-0.30
-0.25
-0.99
-1.19
- 1.07
-1.51
0.78
0.78
-t.24
-1.98
Drift (7.)
Zero
Mid
0.04
0. l3
-0.r3
0.04
-0.20
-0.44
0.00
-0.74
Airgas
an Air Liquide company
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial l,oop Road
Tooele, W 84o74
Airgas.com
Part Number: E03N199E15A01D0
Cylinder Number: E80097304Laboratory: 124 -Tooele (SAP) - UT
PGVP Number: 872022
Gas Code: CO,NO,NOX,BALN
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARI)
Reference Number: 153-402560601-'1
Cylinder Volume: 144.0 CF
Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG
Valve Outlet: 660
CertificationDate: Oct20,2022
Expiration Date: Oct 20, 2030
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA
600/R-1 2/531 , using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of g5%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concenlrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e.0.7 megapascals.
AI\IALYTICAL REST]LTS
Actual Protocol Total RelativeComponentRequested
Concentration
Assay
DatesConcentrationMethod Unceftainty
NOX 50.00 PPM 49.91 PPM G1 +l- 'l .4% NIST Traceable 10/10 12022, 1012012022
CARBON MONOXIDE 50.00 PPM 50.39 PPM G1 +l- 0.8% NIST Traceable 1 0l'1012022
NITRIC OXIDE 50.00 PPM 49.85 PPM G1 +l- '1.4% NIST Traceable 1011012022, 1012012022
NITROGEN Balance
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
Aug 31,2024
Feb 20,2020
Sep 21,2025
Feb 02,2022
Sep 24,2O25
Feb 01,2023
Apr 30,2024
CC5OO959 5.074 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.1%
EBOl3OO55 4.81 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.Oo/o
The SRM, NTRM, PRM, or RGM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assav and not part of the analvsis.
NTRM '12011221
PRM 't2386
NTRM 210607-24
PRM 't239s
NTRM 21060713
GMIS 401648675102
GMIS 1534002020104
KALOO4127 49.24 PPM CARBON MONOXIDE/NITROGEN 0.6%
D685025 9.91 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR
cc708080 48.41 ppM NtTRtC OXTDE/NITROGEN
D887660 9.91 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR
CC7O8O49 48.41 PPM NITRIC OXIDE/NITROGEN
2.OYo
't.2%
2.Oo/o
1.2o/o
lnstrumenUMake/Model
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 CO LCO
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 NO LNO
Nicolet iS50 AUP2 1 10269 NO2 impurity
FTIR
FTIR
FTIR NO2 impurity
od05,2022
od 13,2022
Ocl 12,2022
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sionature on file
Approved for Release Page 1 of 1
-.i-\::j2-r--ryffiz4l.4i\:r.l
k*H*f,'--"
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
80o-ssl -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD #G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS GERTIFIGATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
E80033140
124731
1900 PS|G
=800331
40.20230824-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Gertification Dates:
)9t't5t2023
)9t'14t2026
- Shreveport - LA
E800331 40.20230824
J56/6U01 1
calibration standard has been certified per the PA-600/R-1 2/531,
procedure G1.
Certifi ed Concentration(s)
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Nitrogen Dioxide 50.0 PPM t0.5 PPM FTIR 09 I 0 1 I 2023, 09 I I 5 I 2023
Balance
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
E80057301 E80057301.20201020 05t04t2026 GM|S AtR NO2 96.4 PPM 1.02A C2190301.02
Analvtical lnstrumentation
Princ ry
MKS
MKS
NO2
NO2
FTIR
FTIR
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVSl3T
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVS13T
017146467
017146467
08t31t2023
0911512023
SMART-CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstltute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into accounl
when determining pass or fail.
p**u* /J-a1,,
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 20'l 8-09-1 7
r:*iz:j':remr.,,-:-7'/'.;-\.'!2.,'n '..s
k*HS**
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 7'l'107
800-s51-8150
PGVP Vendor lo # G12o21
EPA PROTOGOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
1R03384
127907
t900 PStG
1R03384.2021 1012-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates :
tQt21t2Q21
lot'19t2029
- Shreveport - LA
iKUJJd4.ZUZ I IU I
t03923781
been per 2 Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-'1 2/531.
G2.
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
r0.18 %
L0.13 %
10t21t2021
1012012021
Reference Standard(s)
SMART.CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnlernational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 lo approximate the 95% confidence level of lhe measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Brittany Johnson
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 201 8-09-1 7
PJT.A(:.|lffidlsg
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71'107
800-551 -81 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
tR03686
25371
9OO PSIG
1R03686.2023083 1-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates :
)9t21t2023
)911912U31
- Shreveoort - LA
RR03686.20230831
r u /553544
has per the r -1
G1.
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
10.9 Yo
10.98 %
10.11 o/o
10.03 %
cc737012.20230228
EB0022021.20180323
1162980025 09t1Bt2023
017146467 09t21t2023
SMART-CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meel lhe defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstilute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnlernational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
fi**. AaU
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 20'18-09-17
FAltatpEr-i I il il i.: i {..; A L. (.:; [] (i t.J il
Location: fuo Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Response Times
Source: Boiler #2
Project No.: AST-2023-3338
se seconds
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO, - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Averase
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
pulffiirce
I I a,) ]l r'.i I (l /\ l, (l R () l..l I-
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: Boiler #2
Proiect No.: AST-2023-3338
Date: l2ll5/2023
Traverse Point Time o2
(Yol
Cor
(o/"\
CO
(nnm)
NOx
(nnm)
A-l
2
-1
8:47
8:48
8:49
4.68
4.64
4.88
4.7
9.53
9.54
9.38
9.5
-0.02
-0.03
-0.03
0.0
7. l8
7.15
7.02
7.1Averase
Criteria Met Sinsle Point Single Point Sinele Point Single Point
!#E'*'
AIlaTEE>
1 []_ (l: [-, i...] lil A i- () F:i a-) Li il
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Project No.: 2023-3338
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
Analyzer Make thermo
Analyzer Model 42i
Serial Number 1.3228+09
:ililHl'.iHii' EBoo3x4o
cvlinder concentration. DDm #
Pre-Test Date Time
Pre-Test Concentration, ppm
Pre-Test Efficiencv. 7o
Post-Test Date l2ll5l23 Time 12:31
Post-Test Concentration, ppm 45.42
Post-Test Efficiency. 7o 9l
*Required Efficiency is > 90 %.
Alffirpe
f i, {j I i l.! ! {-) A L t-) fl r.) 1.,) 1::
Location: fuo Tinto Ke[recott - South Jordil, UT
Source: Boiler#2
Date l2ll4/23
Alalyzer Make:
Analyzer Model:
Analyzer SN:
Environics ID:
Component/Balmce Gas:
Cylinder Gas ID (Dilution);
to0269
o2ll'12
Cylilder Gas Colcentration (Dilution), %: 24
Cyliuder Gas ID (Mid-Level):
Cylinder Gas Concentration (Mid-Level), %: 10.98
@ Tlpm @ Tlprn injections be conducted
Target Msss Flow
Target
Dilution
Target Flow
Rate
Terget
Concentration
Actual
Concentration
Injection I
Analyzer
Concentretion
lnjection 2
Analyzer
Concentratiotr
Injection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
Average
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/,,\
Difference
(v"l
Average Error
(+2%\
t0L/5L 80.0 5.0 19.2 19.2 19.3 19.4 r9.3 19.34 014 o 70/"
t0t./5t.500 50 20 1)O t)')0. l5 t.3yo
I0t./IL 20.0 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.'76 -0.04 -o 90/"
l0l7lt.t00 40 ?4 4 2.4 2.40 0.00 0.oyo
allASTEnvironicsUDitshave2-l0LMassFlowControllers. Fortheseuritsthe9Oo/"(il'llomand80o/"r'2Tlorniniectionswill
Average
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/,,\
Injection I
Error
(+z%\
lnjection 2
Error
(+zo/o\
Injection 3
Error
( +. z "/,\
19.34 -o.to/"o.ty6 o.oo/"
12. l5 0.OYo o.oyo 0.0%
476 o 10/"o to/"-o to/"
2.40 0.0%0.ovo 0.00/o
Gas Calibrstion Direct to
Calibration
Gas
Concentration
(o/^\
Injection I
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/^\
Injection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/^\
Injection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
to/^\
Average
Analyzer
Concentration Difference
Average
Error
( * 2./.\
t0 98 l05 007 0.60/o
Mass Flow Controller Calibration
Document lD 620.009
Revisior 22.0
Effective Dak 12/16/22
lssuing Departmenl Iech Seruices Pao(lofl
Dilution System Make:
Dilution System Model:
Dilution System S/N:
Calibration Equipment Make:
Calibration Equipment Model:
Calibration Equipment S4,l:
Flow Cell 5/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Calibration Gas:
Barometric Pressure, mmHg:
Ambient Temperature, "F:
E nvironics
4040
8027
Alicat Scientific
M.1OSI.PDl5IMM D/5M,
121208/127206
127208
127206
Nitrogen
25.76
66
[/ 1SIPM D/SiV
Mass Flow Controller lD
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
'10,000
Environics
EFC 202
0455242007
10,000
Environics
EFC 202
0455242008
#3
1,000
Environics
EFC 202
0455238004
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cclmin cclmin
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cclmin cclmin
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cdmin cclmin
107o
207o
30%
407o
50v"
60?"
707o
807o
907o
1007.
500 508 1.670
1,000 1,024 2.470
2,000 2,057 2.870
3,000 3,079 2.6y"
4,000 4,104 2.6yo
5,000 5,113 2.3v"
6,000 6,129 2.1y"
7,000 7,136 1.970
8,000 8,145 1.8%
9,000 9,162 1.8yo
10,000 10,193 1.9y"
500 504 o.Byo
1,000 1,020 2.070
2,000 2,048 24%
3,000 3,073 2.470
4,000 4,094 2 4%
5,000 5,107 2.170
6,000 6,120 2.070
7,000 7,134 1.9ya
8,000 8,152 1.970
9,000 9,171 1.9y"
10,000 10,189 1.970
50 50 0.670
100 101 0.7vo
200 203 1.670
300 305 1.870
400 407 1.670
500 547 1.4yo
600 609 1.50/0
700 711 1.6?"
800 813 1.770
900 917 1.970
1,000 1,022 2.2yo
Nole: The mass flow controller's calibration values are used by the dilution system's operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not necessarily
indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use.
Calibration Performed By: RIL
Date: 3/31/2023
E=.Ex6
E_
E
G!
=
gE
e
06
;e

!r
o
<+
6r

o.
i
.
oo
Es
F
$

=E
EGag6
(/
)
E
ofo)
E
ooo(
I
oN
(
o
q?
9
:
:
Or
r
N
NO
O
ba
a
rO
ON<
<
rN
N
oN
o
bO
r
ct

ci

;j
N(
0
(
o
]>
N
N
rr
)
r
ONs
\
rN
N
oCF
=#
e*
-o-EEO
c-
9r
-

.s

d
-N
o
!
E

EE
cc
c
6

>e
Q
f
f,
f
,
>

:1
9
tE
t
<

6u
)
!cLl
lEoa
fr

\x
o
om
F
(I
)
O
-o!l
N
fi
i
-
.!GoGEOJoo
o$
F
'
-
F
-
F
-
\
t
$
-
O
r
@
N
N
t
O
ON
c
O
O
T
N
C
O
S
-
O
S
@
<
t
t
O
@@
l
-
(
)
O
T
O
F
(
O
C
{
@
r
C
O
-
E
^
q3
s
+
+
s
E
E
q
€
f
i
f
r
q
*
=
\t
N
T
O
O
O
O
-
N
O
r
@
@
g
;
(o
r
o
o
$
o
N
@
N
o
$
o
V
=
L
u
o,

o\
t

r
$
F(
\
(
o
o
F

(o
N

o
X=
+

NF
o
o
o

oc
.
'
l
N
N
N
o
-
Y>
.
'

N
t'
-
l
'
.
-
F
-

NN
N
F
-
t
=
N
N
o-
i
I
Eq
or
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
99
9
9
9
C
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
o@
o
@
o
@
o
@
o
@
o
@
o
::

:.

9!

9!

C?

C?

f
:
Yl

Yl

9
I
:.
--
N
N
N
(f
)
o
o
o
(
t
o
o
o
o
o
o
d
)
o
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
66
6
6
6
d
d
6
6
6
6
6
6
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
60
r
)
0
r
)
0
(
)
0
r
)
0
r
)
0
0
(t
)NoNktol,Eooo(f
ooodxozooFJoGo6'oc.EoEo
-a

q;
R
O
\t
a
O
l.
-

6
0t
$
>l

c,
fi

r'
'
;P,Go6Eooo
a;E)o
(o
N
@
(
f
,
o
r
(
r
)
(
)
@
t
-
t
-
O
r
,
-
NO
@
O
O
6
$
O
@
N
r
€
r
:
^
-O
-
\
t
@
O
(
c
l
\
t
r
O
N
O
$
,Y

=
-N
o
o
\
i
o
@
@
o
F
-
o
\
t
r
E
i,

\'
.
o
?
a
?
q
q
q
q
r
i
\
A
q
\
=:

s
O
nV
O
O
O
@
|
o
r
)
N
N
r
F
-
N
tt
+
!
;

-r
@
r
l
'
-
S
6
<
'
S
O
O
@
N
0@
F

$-
N
O
@
(
)
N
N
O
(
O
(
)
N
(
O
--
O
i
r

(O
N
O
N
(
a
\
t
$
\
t
N
O
O
N
N
I
t-

NN
t
'
-
F
-
N
N
N

NI
.
-
I
.
*
r
E(
L
;(
I
)
oaD
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
<)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.i

r-
G
i

NG
i

F-
n
i

NA
i

N.
i

.-
A
i
99
:
:
:
:
|
l
q
!
c
?
q
?
:
I
S
Y
l
Y
l
9
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
T
oo
m
o
o
o
c
r
(
D
o
o
€
)
(
r
)
(
r
)
C{
C
{
C
{
N
N
N
C
{
N
N
N
N
N
N
66
6
6
6
6
6
d
d
6
6
6
d
rD
r
D
r
D
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
c
)
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6|
r
)
r
O
r
O
6
6
6
0
0
0
6
0
6
oNoNrt(,
!Eoooo
ooodxozooFIo(,U'o(,c.goEo
GETan
6
q:
R
O
Fm
F
ro
o
9E
fi
t
s
:ooG
..
!ooE)
=
Gi
o=<x
r)
F
-
n
o
-
r
)
@
F
-
@
(
O
(
r
)
N
(
O
OF
-
-
@
O
T
r
)
S
O
T
r
)
6
O
)
(
o
@
E
('
)
(
O
r
)
€
)
@
$
6
N
r
O
)
t
O
$
(
O
6
o@
o
(
,
r
r
o
r
o
r
o
)
@
s
c
{
o
'E

o
S-
j
c
!
@
$
\
t
r
o
<
t
@
S
o
o
9
5
-o
+
+
d
6
i
o
i
-
o
d
o
<
o
@
r
-
:'
-
:
;

-N
O
@
$
N
O
$
O
n
t
@
n
Pc
:

@o
o
o
o
o
o
$
o
@
o
o
e
Y>
.
'

NN
O
O
C
!
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
O
E3
[

N
Ft
s
N
r
r
r
r
r
t
s
N
N
E-

|
:(
L
iB
m
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ci
r
b
c
i
6
o
t
i
c
i
t
o
L
b
o
r
b
o
Y?
Y
?
9
9
:
:
:
|
!
q
!
q
?
c
?
A
l
Y
?
@@
o
r
o
r
o
r
o
r
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
or
u
r
D
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
r)
(
)
n
r
)
t
o
r
)
t
o
(
)
(
)
r
r
r
)
r
)
r
)
(Y
)Nost6oltEooooi,o6
uoooUxozooFJoGooo.gd
boC{=thoF(u(Jc,(
oE-EoULoco&.
(J
:ZFG,
t,TAH DEPABTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL OI'IAI.JTY
FEB 1 2 2024
DIVISION OF AIR QUALTTY
Boiler 2 Nox CO 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name University of Utah
Company Contact:Jenny Esker
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Boiler #2
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/15/2023 &
Review Date: 3/1/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 1.5 3.0 0.730 0.016
ppm 9.0 7.927
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #3.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
41.00 9.168 0.9820 1.4 0.84 25.50 -0.4
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
Boiler 2 Nox CO 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
University of Utah
Boiler #2
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.73 0.02 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 7.93 0.00 9.19 4.95
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 8.678E-07 1.729E-08
lbs./hr.0.76 0.02 9.24 4.87
ppm corrected for %O2 8.11 0.00 9.43 4.92
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 8.370E-07 1.882E-08
lbs./hr.0.72 0.02 9.17 4.97
ppm corrected for %O2 7.87 0.00 9.43 5.06 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 8.268E-07 1.787E-08
lbs./hr.0.71 0.02 9.15 5.02
ppm corrected for %O2 7.80 0.000 9.36 5.14 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
Boiler 2 Nox CO 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 15, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.98 11.03 0.05 0.21% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 24.00 24.02 0.02 0.08% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.75%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.90 11.20 0.30 1.266% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 23.70 23.74 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date December 15, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 49.91
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.06 0.06 0.120% Passed Cal.
EB0097304 10/20/30 Mid-level 24.95 25.07 0.12 0.240% Passed Cal.
High-level 49.91 49.93 0.02 0.040% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 15, 2023 CO
3 CS - Cal. Span 50.39
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.02 0.02 0.040% Passed Cal.
EB0097304 10/20/30 Mid-level 25.19 25.70 0.51 1.012% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.39 50.56 0.17 0.337% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Boiler 2 Nox CO 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler #2
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.06 -0.02 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 25.07 25.70 11.20 11.03
High-Level 49.93 50.56 23.74 24.02
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 25.07 25.70 11.20 11.03
Low-Level 0.12% 0.04% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.06 0.02 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.24% 1.01% 1.27% 0.21%
ppmdv Difference 0.12 0.51 0.3 0.05
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.04% 0.34% 0.17% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.17 0.04 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.10 -0.26 0.07 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.32% 0.48% 0.13% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.16 0.24 0.03 0.08
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.38 25.74 11.08 10.94
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.38% 0.08% 0.51% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 0.69 0.04 0.12 0.09
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
7.3 -0.09 9.4 4.9 CO
0.0% 14.7% 0.2% 39.8% 20.5% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.35 -0.41 0.10 0.11 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.82% 0.77% 0.25% 0.46%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.80 25.49 11.15 11.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.54% 0.42% 0.21% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.50% 0.30% 0.13% 0.13% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.84% 0.34% 0.30% 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
9.168 25.50 -0.40 25.47 297 9.24 4.87 85.90 29.67 27.90
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 5.2263
0.9820 0.84 42.755 143.30 40 37.772 6.745 0.1515 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.7072 52.430 1,026,887 28,841 871,295.15 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.36 0.600 282 38 36 844 711 132.5
2 0.39 0.624 285 39 35 743 741 1.8
3 0.46 0.678 289 39 34 636 636 0.6
4 0.58 0.762 290 39 35 955 947 8.4
5 0.65 0.806 291 40 35
6 0.67 0.819 293 40 35
7 0.59 0.768 294 42 36
8 0.58 0.762 296 44 36
9 0.30 0.548 294 45 37
10 0.36 0.600 299 47 36
11 0.48 0.693 302 48 37
12 0.56 0.748 305 53 38
13 0.60 0.775 308 55 38
14 0.58 0.762 310
15 0.51 0.714 311
16 0.43 0.656 310
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
Boiler 2 Nox CO 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler #2
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.06 -0.02 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 25.07 25.70 11.20 11.03
High-Level 49.93 50.56 23.74 24.02
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 25.07 25.70 11.20 11.03
Low-Level 0.12% 0.04% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.06 0.02 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.24% 1.01% 1.27% 0.21%
ppmdv Difference 0.12 0.51 0.3 0.05
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.04% 0.34% 0.17% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.17 0.04 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.35 -0.41 0.10 0.11 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.82% 0.77% 0.25% 0.46%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.41 0.39 0.06 0.11
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.80 25.49 11.15 11.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.54% 0.42% 0.21% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.27 0.21 0.05 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
7.2 -0.20 9.4 5.1 CO
0.0% 14.3% 0.4% 39.6% 21.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.33 -0.52 0.10 0.16 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.78% 0.99% 0.25% 0.67%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.45 25.16 11.13 11.03
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.24% 1.07% 0.30% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.04% 0.22% 0.00% 0.21% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.70% 0.65% 0.08% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
9.17 25.50 -0.40 25.47 309 9.17 4.97 85.86 29.67 27.91
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 6.2292
0.9820 0.84 44.654 143.00 60 37.960 6.731 0.1506 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.7073 52.83 1,018,997 29,061 865,524.06 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.33 0.574 298 59 62 857 724 133
2 0.41 0.640 306 60 63 744 743 1.3
3 0.51 0.714 310 62 60 637 636 0.6
4 0.55 0.742 311 63 58 963 955 8.1
5 0.58 0.762 314 63 54
6 0.54 0.735 312 64 52
7 0.50 0.707 310 65 51
8 0.43 0.656 311 65 51
9 0.31 0.557 302 65 51
10 0.46 0.678 305 66 52
11 0.54 0.735 306 66 53
12 0.62 0.787 311 67 55
13 0.62 0.787 314 67 56
14 0.63 0.794 313
15 0.58 0.762 311
16 0.47 0.686 312
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
Boiler 2 Nox CO 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler #2
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.06 -0.02 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 25.07 25.70 11.20 11.03
High-Level 49.93 50.56 23.74 24.02
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 25.07 25.70 11.20 11.03
Low-Level 0.12% 0.04% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.06 0.02 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.24% 1.01% 1.27% 0.21%
ppmv Difference 0.12 0.51 0.3 0.05
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.04% 0.34% 0.17% 0.08%
ppmv Difference 0.02 0.17 0.04 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.33 -0.52 0.10 0.16 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.78% 0.99% 0.25% 0.67%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.39 0.5 0.06 0.16
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.45 25.16 11.13 11.03
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.24% 1.07% 0.30% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.62 0.54 0.07 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/15/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
7.0 -0.32 9.4 5.1 CO
0.0% 14.0% 0.6% 39.5% 21.4% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.33 -0.62 0.07 0.17 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.78% 1.19% 0.13% 0.71%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.08 24.94 11.14 11.06
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.98% 1.51% 0.25% 0.13%
Difference TRUE 1.0 0.8 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.20% 0.13% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.74% 0.44% 0.04% 0.13%
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Boiler #2 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
9.17 25.50 -0.40 25.47 315 9.15 5.02 85.83 29.66 27.88
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 6.8198
0.9820 0.84 43.563 141.90 61 36.956 6.679 0.1531 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.7054 52.94 1,012,970 29,121 857,914.95 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.35 0.592 301 67 47 861 727 133.7
2 0.40 0.632 312 68 48 745 744 1.2
3 0.55 0.742 316 69 47 637 637 0.1
4 0.55 0.742 317 70 48 970 963 6.9
5 0.55 0.742 318 72 48
6 0.52 0.721 317 72 49
7 0.47 0.686 317 72 49
8 0.40 0.632 315 73 50
9 0.30 0.548 311 73 50
10 0.42 0.648 319 74 52
11 0.57 0.755 320 74 51
12 0.65 0.806 318 74 52
13 0.64 0.800 315 75 54
14 0.64 0.800 317
15 0.57 0.755 316
16 0.47 0.686 316
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog